Exhibit 99.3

QLOGIC CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

QLOGIC CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

QLOGIC CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

QLOGIC CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

QLOGIC CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management of QLogic Corporation (QLogic or the Company), the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all normal recurring accruals and adjustments necessary to present fairly the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2016. The results of operations for the three months ended July 3, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates that affect the amounts reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment. Among the significant estimates affecting the consolidated financial statements are those related to revenue recognition, income taxes, inventories, goodwill and long-lived assets. The actual results experienced by the Company could differ materially from management’s estimates.

Pending Acquisition by Cavium, Inc.

On June 15, 2016, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (Merger Agreement) with Cavium, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Parent or Cavium), and Quasar Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (the Offeror or Sub).

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, on July 13, 2016, the Offeror commenced an offer to exchange (the Offer) each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock for (i) $11.00 in cash (Cash Consideration) and (ii) 0.098 (Exchange Ratio) shares of common stock (Cavium Common Stock) of Cavium (Share Consideration) and, together with the Cash Consideration, (Offer Consideration), without interest and subject to any required withholding for taxes. The Offer is scheduled to expire at midnight, Eastern Standard Time (EST), at the end of August 9, 2016 unless extended by the Offeror pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and applicable law. As soon as practicable following the consummation of the Offer, and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, the Offeror will merge with and into the Company (the Merger) pursuant to the provisions of Section 251(h) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, with no stockholder vote required to consummate the Merger. In the Merger, the Company will survive as a wholly owned subsidiary of Cavium, and each issued and outstanding share of the Company’s common stock, other than shares of the Company’s common stock held in treasury of the Company, shares of the Company’s common stock owned by Cavium or any subsidiary of Cavium (including the Offeror) or shares of the Company’s common stock owned by stockholders who are entitled to and validly exercise appraisal rights under Delaware law, will be converted into the right to receive the Offer Consideration. Cavium intends to fund the Offer Consideration with a combination of cash on hand and committed debt financing.

In general, as a result of the Merger, at the effective time of the Merger, (i) unvested Company stock options that are in-the-money will be assumed by Cavium and converted into Cavium stock options; (ii) vested Company stock option that are in-the-money will receive a portion of the Offer Consideration based on the in-the-money spread value of the Company stock options; (iii) out-of-the-money Company stock options (whether vested or unvested) will be cancelled and receive no payment; (iv) unvested Company restricted stock units will be assumed and converted into Cavium restricted stock units; (v) vested Company restricted stock units (which includes restricted stock units that will vest just prior to the effective time of the Merger) will receive the Offer Consideration based on the number of shares of the Company’s common stock underlying the restricted stock unit; and (vi) unvested Company restricted stock units subject to performance based vesting will be assumed by Cavium and converted into Cavium restricted stock units (based on the level of performance achieved as of the last trading day prior to the closing of the Merger).

The obligation of each party to consummate the Offer and the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, including (i) at least a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, when added to shares of the Company’s common stock already owned by the Offeror, having been validly tendered into (and not withdrawn from) the Offer prior to the expiration date of the Offer (Minimum Condition), (ii) the exchange of shares of Cavium Common Stock pursuant to the Offer and the Merger having been registered pursuant to a registration statement filed by Cavium with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and declared effective by the SEC, (iii) shares of Cavium Common Stock issuable pursuant to the Offer and the Merger having been authorized for listing on Nasdaq, (iv) the expiration or termination of any applicable regulatory waiting periods and/or receipt of regulatory clearance, (v) the absence of any order or ruling prohibiting the consummation of the Merger, and (vi) subject to certain exceptions, the accuracy of the other party’s representations and warranties and compliance with covenants. In addition, the obligation of Cavium and the Offeror to consummate the Merger is also subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the condition that no material adverse effect on the Company shall have occurred since the date of the Merger Agreement. Cavium’s and the Company’s obligations are not subject to any financing condition.

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for each of the Company and Cavium, including, among others, if the Offer is not consummated at or prior to 11:59 p.m. EST on November 12, 2016. Upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, including a termination by the Company to enter into an agreement for an alternative transaction pursuant to a “superior proposal,” the Company has agreed to pay Cavium a termination fee of $47.8 million.

The Company expects the transaction to be completed in the second quarter of fiscal 2017.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Effective

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an accounting standard update that requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. This standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance when it becomes effective. In July 2015, the FASB amended this standard to defer the effective date by one year and permit early adoption as of the original effective date. This amended standard is effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. This standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this new guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and has not yet selected a transition method.

Note 2. Marketable Securities

The Company’s portfolio of available-for-sale marketable securities consists of the following:

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities as of July 3, 2016, by contractual maturity, are presented below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of securities may have the right to repay obligations without prepayment penalties. Certain debt instruments, although possessing a contractual maturity greater than one year, are classified as short-term marketable securities based on their ability to be traded on active markets and availability for current operations.

The following table presents the Company’s marketable securities with unrealized losses by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of July 3, 2016 and April 3, 2016.

As of July 3, 2016 and April 3, 2016, the fair value of certain of the Company’s available-for-sale securities was less than their cost basis. Management reviewed various factors in determining whether to recognize an impairment charge related to these unrealized losses, including the current financial and credit market environment, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer of the security, the magnitude of the unrealized loss compared to the cost of the investment, the length of time the investment had been in a loss position and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery of market value. As of July 3, 2016 and April 3, 2016, the Company determined that the unrealized losses were temporary in nature and recorded them as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.

Note 3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The carrying value of cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value because of the nature and short-term maturity of these financial instruments.

A summary of the assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 3, 2016 and April 3, 2016 are as follows:

The Company’s investments classified within Level 2 were primarily valued based on valuations obtained from a third-party pricing service. To estimate fair value, the pricing service utilizes industry-standard valuation models, including both income and market-based approaches for which all significant inputs are observable either directly or indirectly. The Company obtained documentation from the pricing service as to the methodology and summary of inputs used for the various types of securities. The pricing service maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. These observable inputs include reported trades and broker/dealer quotes of the same or similar securities, issuer credit spreads, benchmark securities and other observable inputs. The Company compares valuation information from the pricing service with other pricing sources to validate the reasonableness of the valuations.

Note 4. Inventories

Components of inventories are as follows:

Note 5. Special Charges

In connection with the Company’s restructuring plans discussed below, management recorded special charges of $(0.6) million and $1.1 million during the three months ended July 3, 2016 and June 28, 2015, respectively.

September 2015 Initiative

In September 2015, the Company commenced a restructuring plan (September 2015 Initiative) designed to align its future operating expenses with its revenue expectations. The restructuring plan included a workforce reduction and the consolidation and elimination of certain engineering activities.

During the three months ended July 3, 2016, the Company recorded special charges of $(0.8) million, related to the September 2015 Initiative. In June 2016, the Company negotiated a lease termination and settlement of the obligation associated with a facility that it ceased using during fiscal 2016. Accordingly, the Company reduced the previously-established lease obligation with a corresponding reduction in special charges.

The aggregate amount of the special charges recorded in connection with the September 2015 Initiative was $9.9 million and consisted of $7.8 million of severance and related costs associated with involuntarily terminated employees, $2.0 million of asset impairment charges related to property and equipment and $0.1 million of facilities and other costs.

Activity and liability balances for exit costs related to this initiative are as follows:

The Company completed these restructuring activities and all amounts were paid as of July 3, 2016.

May 2015 Initiative

In May 2015, the Company commenced a restructuring plan (May 2015 Initiative) designed to streamline business operations and recorded special charges of $0.7 million during the three months ended June 28, 2015. The special charges consisted entirely of exit costs associated with severance benefits for the involuntarily terminated employees. The Company completed these restructuring activities and all amounts were paid as of September 27, 2015.

June 2013 Initiative

In June 2013, the Company commenced a restructuring plan (June 2013 Initiative) designed to enhance product focus and streamline business operations. The restructuring plan includes a workforce reduction and the consolidation and elimination of certain engineering activities. In connection with this plan, the Company ceased development of future application-specific integrated circuits for switch products.

In connection with the June 2013 Initiative, the Company recorded special charges of $0.1 million and $0.4 million during the three months ended July 3, 2016 and June 28, 2015, respectively. Special charges for both periods consisted entirely of exit costs associated with severance and related costs for involuntarily terminated employees. Certain employees that were notified of their termination are required to provide future services for varying periods in excess of statutory notice periods. Severance costs related to these services are recognized ratably over the estimated requisite service period. The Company expects to incur less than $1 million of additional severance costs in connection with these employees over the remaining requisite service period.

The aggregate amount of the special charges recorded in connection with the June 2013 Initiative is $25.7 million and consisted of $15.3 million of severance and related costs associated with involuntarily terminated employees, $5.9 million of facilities and other costs and $4.5 million of asset impairment charges primarily related to abandoned property and equipment.

Activity and liability balances for exit costs related to the June 2013 Initiative are as follows:

The unpaid exit costs related to the June 2013 Initiative are expected to be paid over the terms of the related agreements through fiscal 2019.

A summary of the total unpaid exit costs for all restructuring plans, by classification, included in the condensed consolidated balance sheets is as follows:

Note 6. Income Taxes

The Company’s income tax expense (benefit) was $(1.0) million and $4.9 million for the three months ended July 3, 2016 and June 28, 2015, respectively. Income tax benefit for the three months ended July 3, 2016 was favorably impacted by the resolution of tax examinations for prior years. Income tax expense for the three months ended June 28, 2015 was impacted by the negative effect of a discrete tax-related item associated with the difference between stock-based compensation expense and the deduction related to stock-based awards on income tax returns. The Company’s income tax expense is based on the estimated income for the year, the composition of the estimated income in different tax jurisdictions, and the tax effect, if any, of newly enacted tax legislation, resolution of tax audits, changes in uncertain tax positions, and other discrete tax-related items during the applicable quarterly periods. The allocation of taxable income to domestic and foreign tax jurisdictions impacts the effective tax rate, as the Company’s income tax rate in foreign jurisdictions is generally lower than its income tax rate in the United States.

Note 7. Net Income Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share:

Stock-based awards, including stock options and restricted stock units, representing 5.0 million and 6.1 million shares of common stock have been excluded from the diluted per share calculations for the three months ended July 3, 2016 and June 28, 2015, respectively. These stock-based awards have been excluded from the diluted per share calculations because their effect would have been antidilutive.

Note 8. Legal Proceedings

On September 28, 2015, a purported class action was commenced in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California asserting claims arising under federal securities laws against the Company and certain individual defendants. The plaintiff, Phyllis Hull, purported to represent a class of persons who purchased the Company’s common stock between April 30, 2015 and July 30, 2015. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants, including a former officer and a current officer, engaged in a scheme to inflate the Company’s stock price by making false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s operations, financial results and future business prospects in violation of federal securities laws. The plaintiff sought compensatory damages, interest and an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. On March 4, 2016, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation with the Court to voluntarily dismiss the case. On March 7, 2016, the Court dismissed the case with prejudice as to Phyllis Hull and her individual claims and without prejudice as to the unnamed class members.

On October 23 2015, Stephen Kramer filed a shareholder derivative complaint in the California Superior Court in and for the County of Orange County purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain current and former officers and directors of the Company. The plaintiff alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, corporate waste, aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty, and improper insider sales of stock in violation of California law based on the allegation that, since October 17, 2014, the individual defendants engaged in a scheme to inflate the Company’s stock price by making false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s operations, financial results, internal controls and future business prospects. The plaintiff sought an award of damages and restitution to the Company from the individual defendants, disgorgement of the individual defendants’ profits and compensation, an order requiring the Company to reform and improve its corporate governance, and an award of costs and attorneys’ fees to the plaintiff and its counsel. On March 14, 2016, a second shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the same Court. The plaintiff in the second suit, Indiana Laborers Pension and Welfare Funds, made similar allegations against certain current and former officers and directors of the Company, and sought similar demands. On June 8, 2016, the parties in both cases filed Joint Stipulations with the Court to voluntarily dismiss the respective cases. On June 13, 2016, the Court dismissed the second shareholder derivative suit without prejudice as to Indiana Laborers Pension and Welfare Funds and on June 14, 2016 the Court dismissed the first shareholder derivative suit without prejudice as to Stephen Kramer.

On July 22, 2016, a putative securities class action was commenced in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California asserting claims arising under federal securities laws against the Company and certain defendants, including the directors and an officer. The plaintiff, Stephen Bushansky, purports to represent the public stockholders of the Company. The plaintiff alleges that the proposed acquisition of QLogic by Cavium pursuant to the Merger Agreement (the Proposed Transaction), is the result of an unfair process and coercive deal-protection devices and provides the Company’s stockholders with inadequate consideration. The plaintiff further alleges that the Company’s Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9, filed with the SEC on July 13, 2016, omits or misrepresents material information concerning the Proposed Transaction in violation of federal securities laws. The plaintiff seeks class certification, an injunction enjoining the Proposed Transaction, a declaration that the defendants violated certain federal securities laws, compensatory damages, and reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

Because the lawsuit is in its early stages, it is not possible to determine the potential outcome of the lawsuit or to make any estimate of probable losses at this time. The Company believes that the claims asserted in the lawsuit are without merit and intends to defend its position. A negative outcome in the lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on the Company if it results in preliminary or permanent injunctive relief or rescission of the Merger Agreement. The Company currently believes the disposition of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Various other lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be instituted against the Company. The outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty and some lawsuits, claims and proceedings may be disposed of unfavorably to the Company. Many intellectual property disputes have a risk of injunctive relief and there can be no assurance that a license will be granted. Injunctive relief could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Based on an evaluation of such other matters that are pending or asserted, management believes the disposition of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.