Attached files

file filename
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - DNB FINANCIAL CORP /PA/c671-20170630xex32_2.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - DNB FINANCIAL CORP /PA/c671-20170630xex32_1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - DNB FINANCIAL CORP /PA/c671-20170630xex31_2.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - DNB FINANCIAL CORP /PA/c671-20170630xex31_1.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

____________________



FORM 10-Q



[X] Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2017

or

[  ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



For the transition period from ________________ to _____________



Commission File Number: 1-34242

DNB Financial Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania                                       23-2222567

 

 

 

 

 

    Pennsylvania                                       23-2222567

(State or other jurisdiction of                                                                (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

incorporation or organization)

 

4 Brandywine Avenue - Downingtown, PA 19335

(Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)



(610) 269-1040

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days

   



 

 

Yes

 

No



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). 





 

 

Yes

 

No



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.





 

 

 

 

 

Large accelerated filer

  

Accelerated filer

  

Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    

 

Smaller reporting company

 

Emerging growth company

 

 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).



 

 

Yes 

 

No



Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock ($1.00 Par Value)

(Class)

 

4,262,589 (Shares Outstanding as of August 11, 2017) 




 

 

DNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY





INDEX



                                                                



 

 

 

 

 



 

PART  I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

PAGE NO.



 

 

 

ITEM 1.      

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited):

 



 

 

 



 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

 



 

June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016



 

 

 



 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

 



 

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016



 

 

 



 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

 

 



 

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016



 

 

 



 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY



 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

 



 

 

 



 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 



 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016



 

 

 



 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



 

 

 

ITEM 2. 

 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

31 



 

 

 



 

 

 

ITEM 3.      

 

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

47 



 

 

 

ITEM 4.      

 

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

47 



 

 

 



 

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 



 

 

 

ITEM 1.

 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

47 



 

 

 

ITEM 1A.

 

RISK FACTORS

47 



 

 

 

ITEM 2.      

 

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY  SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

47 



 

 

 

ITEM 3.      

 

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

48 



 

 

 

ITEM 4.      

 

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

48 



 

 

 

ITEM 5.      

 

OTHER INFORMATION

48 



 

 

 

ITEM 6.      

 

EXHIBITS

48 



 

 

 

SIGNATURES

49 



 

 

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

50 



 

 

 



 

2

 


 

 





PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DNB Financial Corporation and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (Unaudited)







 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



June 30,

 

December 31,

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

2017

 

2016

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks

$

36,189 

 

$

22,103 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

36,189 

 

 

22,103 

Available-for-sale investment securities at fair value (amortized cost of $111,319 and $116,830)

 

109,900 

 

 

115,184 

Held-to-maturity investment securities (fair value of $67,388 and $66,124)

 

67,249 

 

 

67,022 

Total investment securities

 

177,149 

 

 

182,206 

Loans

 

816,525 

 

 

817,529 

Allowance for credit losses

 

(5,267)

 

 

(5,373)

Net loans

 

811,258 

 

 

812,156 

Restricted stock

 

6,566 

 

 

5,381 

Office property and equipment, net

 

9,099 

 

 

9,243 

Accrued interest receivable

 

3,558 

 

 

3,567 

Other real estate owned & other repossessed property

 

5,351 

 

 

2,767 

Bank owned life insurance (BOLI)

 

9,432 

 

 

9,552 

Core deposit intangible

 

485 

 

 

537 

Goodwill

 

15,525 

 

 

15,590 

Net deferred taxes

 

4,882 

 

 

5,250 

Other assets

 

1,966 

 

 

2,333 

Total assets 

$

1,081,460 

 

$

1,070,685 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Non-interest-bearing deposits

$

181,529 

 

$

173,467 

Interest-bearing deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

NOW

 

209,355 

 

 

224,219 

Money market

 

240,434 

 

 

184,783 

Savings

 

84,820 

 

 

86,176 

Time

 

147,110 

 

 

187,256 

Brokered deposits

 

29,811 

 

 

29,286 

Total deposits 

 

893,059 

 

 

885,187 

Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLBP) advances

 

49,869 

 

 

55,332 

Repurchase agreements

 

15,700 

 

 

11,889 

Junior subordinated debentures

 

9,279 

 

 

9,279 

Subordinated debt

 

9,750 

 

 

9,750 

Other borrowings

 

393 

 

 

418 

Total borrowings

 

84,991 

 

 

86,668 

Accrued interest payable

 

552 

 

 

534 

Other liabilities

 

3,453 

 

 

3,456 

Total liabilities 

 

982,055 

 

 

975,845 

Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $1.00 par value;

 

 

 

 

 

20,000,000 shares authorized; 4,343,484 and 4,334,352 issued, respectively; 4,258,073 and 4,240,778 outstanding, respectively

 

4,368 

 

 

4,351 

Treasury stock, at cost; 85,411 and 93,574 shares, respectively

 

(1,582)

 

 

(1,730)

Surplus

 

69,088 

 

 

68,973 

Retained earnings

 

29,651 

 

 

25,520 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(2,120)

 

 

(2,274)

Total stockholders’ equity 

 

99,405 

 

 

94,840 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity 

$

1,081,460 

 

$

1,070,685 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

 


 

 

DNB Financial Corporation and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)

 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended



June 30,

 

June 30,

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

2017

 

2016

 

2017

 

2016

Interest Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and fees on loans

$

9,574 

 

$

5,091 

 

$

19,095 

 

$

10,159 

Interest and dividends on investment securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

757 

 

 

752 

 

 

1,454 

 

 

1,434 

Exempt from federal taxes

 

236 

 

 

294 

 

 

478 

 

 

628 

Interest on cash and cash equivalents

 

94 

 

 

43 

 

 

128 

 

 

64 

Total interest and dividend income

 

10,661 

 

 

6,180 

 

 

21,155 

 

 

12,285 

Interest Expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest on NOW, money market and savings

 

588 

 

 

194 

 

 

1,072 

 

 

358 

Interest on time deposits

 

313 

 

 

140 

 

 

614 

 

 

257 

Interest on brokered deposits

 

94 

 

 

71 

 

 

186 

 

 

133 

Interest on FHLB advances

 

168 

 

 

90 

 

 

337 

 

 

184 

Interest on repurchase agreements

 

 

 

10 

 

 

13 

 

 

21 

Interest on junior subordinated debentures

 

95 

 

 

84 

 

 

187 

 

 

165 

Interest on subordinated debt

 

103 

 

 

103 

 

 

207 

 

 

207 

Interest on other borrowings

 

14 

 

 

16 

 

 

28 

 

 

33 

Total interest expense

 

1,382 

 

 

708 

 

 

2,644 

 

 

1,358 

Net interest income

 

9,279 

 

 

5,472 

 

 

18,511 

 

 

10,927 

Provision for credit losses

 

585 

 

 

200 

 

 

910 

 

 

530 

Net interest income after provision for credit losses

 

8,694 

 

 

5,272 

 

 

17,601 

 

 

10,397 

Non-interest Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service charges

 

291 

 

 

240 

 

 

654 

 

 

547 

Wealth management

 

471 

 

 

441 

 

 

845 

 

 

838 

Mortgage banking

 

14 

 

 

81 

 

 

50 

 

 

113 

Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI

 

55 

 

 

55 

 

 

110 

 

 

110 

Gain on sale of investment securities, net

 

25 

 

 

203 

 

 

25 

 

 

234 

Gain on sale of loans

 

97 

 

 

 -

 

 

97 

 

 

39 

Gains from insurance proceeds

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

80 

 

 

1,150 

Other fees

 

469 

 

 

367 

 

 

867 

 

 

685 

Total non-interest income

 

1,422 

 

 

1,387 

 

 

2,728 

 

 

3,716 

Non-interest Expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 

3,724 

 

 

2,693 

 

 

7,365 

 

 

5,819 

Furniture and equipment

 

505 

 

 

342 

 

 

1,001 

 

 

671 

Occupancy

 

656 

 

 

467 

 

 

1,375 

 

 

935 

Professional and consulting

 

456 

 

 

333 

 

 

849 

 

 

642 

Advertising and marketing

 

274 

 

 

166 

 

 

440 

 

 

349 

Printing and supplies

 

86 

 

 

60 

 

 

136 

 

 

93 

FDIC insurance

 

150 

 

 

121 

 

 

345 

 

 

250 

PA shares tax

 

233 

 

 

157 

 

 

458 

 

 

319 

Telecommunications

 

88 

 

 

61 

 

 

178 

 

 

122 

Postage

 

27 

 

 

21 

 

 

62 

 

 

42 

Loss on sale or write down of OREO, net

 

115 

 

 

 

 

114 

 

 

Due diligence and merger expense

 

26 

 

 

275 

 

 

77 

 

 

463 

Other expenses

 

744 

 

 

472 

 

 

1,429 

 

 

881 

Total non-interest expense

 

7,084 

 

 

5,172 

 

 

13,829 

 

 

10,590 

Income before income tax expense

 

3,032 

 

 

1,487 

 

 

6,500 

 

 

3,523 

Income tax expense

 

746 

 

 

378 

 

 

1,773 

 

 

858 

Net income

$

2,286 

 

$

1,109 

 

$

4,727 

 

$

2,665 

Earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

0.54 

 

$

0.39 

 

$

1.11 

 

$

0.94 

Diluted

$

0.53 

 

$

0.39 

 

$

1.10 

 

$

0.93 

Cash dividends per common share

$

0.07 

 

$

0.07 

 

$

0.14 

 

$

0.14 

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Basic

4,257,633 

 

2,848,648 

 

4,252,207 

 

2,840,677 

 Diluted

4,292,411 

 

2,882,729 

 

4,283,424 

 

2,876,016 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

 


 

 

DNB Financial Corporation and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended



June 30,

 

June 30,

(Dollars in thousands)

2017

 

2016

 

2017

 

2016

Net income

$

2,286 

 

$

1,109 

 

$

4,727 

 

$

2,665 

Other Comprehensive Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized holding gains arising during the period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Before tax amount

 

85 

 

 

605 

 

 

236 

 

 

2,074 

Tax effect

 

(29)

 

 

(207)

 

 

(80)

 

 

(706)



 

56 

 

 

398 

 

 

156 

 

 

1,368 

Accretion of discount on AFS to HTM reclassification(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Before tax amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax effect(2)

 

(1)

 

 

 -

 

 

(3)

 

 

(1)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less reclassification for gains on sales of AFS investment securities included in net income(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Before tax amount

 

(9)

 

 

(203)

 

 

(9)

 

 

(234)

Tax effect(2)

 

 

 

70 

 

 

 

 

80 



 

(6)

 

 

(133)

 

 

(6)

 

 

(154)

Total other comprehensive income

 

54 

 

 

266 

 

 

154 

 

 

1,216 

Total comprehensive income

$

2,340 

 

$

1,375 

 

$

4,881 

 

$

3,881 

(1) Amounts are included in interest and dividends on investment securities in the consolidated statements of income.

(2) Amounts are included in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income.

(3) Amounts are included in "Gains on sale of investment securities, net" in the consolidated statements of income.

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.



5

 


 

 

DNB Financial Corporation and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 



Common

Treasury

 

Retained

Comprehensive

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Stock

Stock

Surplus

Earnings

Loss

Total

Balance at January 1, 2017

$

4,351 

$

(1,730)

$

68,973 

$

25,520 

$

(2,274)

$

94,840 

Net income for six months ended June 30, 2017

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

4,727 

 

 -

 

4,727 

Other comprehensive income

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

154 

 

154 

Restricted stock compensation expense

 

 

 -

 

206 

 

 -

 

 -

 

214 

Exercise of stock options (9,132 shares)

 

 

 -

 

(9)

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

Taxes on exercise of stock options

 

 -

 

 -

 

(187)

 

 -

 

 -

 

(187)

Cash dividends - common ($0.14 per share)

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(596)

 

 -

 

(596)

Sale of treasury shares to 401(k) (5,390 shares)

 

 -

 

98 

 

37 

 

 -

 

 -

 

135 

Sale of treasury shares to deferred comp. plan (2,773 shares)

 

 -

 

50 

 

68 

 

 -

 

 -

 

118 

Balance at June 30, 2017

$

4,368 

$

(1,582)

$

69,088 

$

29,651 

$

(2,120)

$

99,405 







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 



Common

Treasury

 

 

Retained

Comprehensive

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Stock

Stock

Surplus

Earnings

Loss

Total

Balance at January 1, 2016

$

2,955 

$

(2,015)

$

35,097 

$

21,436 

$

(1,985)

$

55,488 

Net income for six months ended June 30, 2016

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

2,665 

 

 -

 

2,665 

Other comprehensive income

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

1,216 

 

1,216 

Restricted stock compensation expense (18,079 shares vested)

 

32 

 

 -

 

698 

 

 -

 

 -

 

730 

Taxes on share award vest

 

(15)

 

 -

 

(421)

 

 -

 

 -

 

(436)

Tax benefit for restricted stock vest

 

 -

 

 -

 

64 

 

 -

 

 -

 

64 

Cash dividends - common ($0.14 per share)

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(398)

 

 -

 

(398)

Sale of treasury shares to 401(k) (4,288 shares)

 

 -

 

78 

 

52 

 

 -

 

 -

 

130 

Sale of treasury shares to deferred comp. plan (2,566 shares)

 

 -

 

47 

 

31 

 

 -

 

 -

 

78 

Balance at June 30, 2016

$

2,972 

$

(1,890)

$

35,521 

$

23,703 

$

(769)

$

59,537 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6

 


 

 

DNB Financial Corporation and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)







 

 

 

 



Six Months Ended June 30,

(Dollars in thousands)

2017

2016

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

Net income

$

4,727 

$

2,665 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

Depreciation, amortization and accretion

 

846 

 

743 

Provision for credit losses

 

910 

 

530 

Stock based compensation

 

214 

 

730 

Net gain on sale of securities

 

(25)

 

(234)

Net loss on sale or write down of OREO and other repossessed property

 

114 

 

Gain on insurance proceeds

 

(80)

 

(1,150)

Earnings from investment in BOLI

 

(110)

 

(110)

Deferred tax expense

 

289 

 

176 

Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans

 

1,657 

 

5,020 

Mortgage loans originated for sale

 

(1,607)

 

(4,907)

Mortgage banking income

 

(50)

 

(113)

Proceeds from sales of loans

 

1,742 

 

525 

Loans originated for sale

 

(1,645)

 

(486)

Gain on sale of loans

 

(97)

 

(39)

Decrease in accrued interest receivable

 

 

20 

Decrease in other assets

 

369 

 

226 

Increase in accrued interest payable

 

18 

 

32 

(Decrease) increase in other liabilities

 

(3)

 

394 

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

 

7,278 

 

4,026 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

Activity in available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

3,030 

 

28,215 

Maturities, repayments and calls

 

14,341 

 

28,147 

Purchases

 

(12,086)

 

(50,573)

Activity in held-to-maturity securities:

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

737 

 

 -

Maturities, repayments and calls

 

507 

 

6,533 

Purchases

 

(1,407)

 

(13,507)

Net (increase) decrease in restricted stock

 

(1,185)

 

129 

Net increase in loans

 

(2,798)

 

(12,877)

Proceeds from insurance

 

 -

 

1,150 

Death benefit proceeds

 

310 

 

 -

Purchases of property and equipment

 

(459)

 

(2,158)

Costs capitalized in OREO and other repossessed property

 

(15)

 

(735)

Proceeds from sale of OREO and other repossessed property

 

168 

 

360 

Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Investing Activities

 

1,143 

 

(15,316)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

Net increase in deposits

 

7,872 

 

35,569 

Repayment of FHLBP advances

 

(13,311)

 

(10,000)

Funding of FHLBP advances

 

7,848 

 

 -

Net increase (decrease) in repurchase agreements

 

3,811 

 

(14,668)

Repayment of other borrowings

 

(25)

 

(22)

Dividends paid

 

(596)

 

(398)

Taxes on exercise of stock options

 

(187)

 

(436)

Tax benefit for stock option exercises

 

 -

 

64 

Sale of treasury stock

 

253 

 

208 

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

 

5,665 

 

10,317 

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents 

 

14,086 

 

(973)

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 

 

22,103 

 

21,119 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period 

$

36,189 

$

20,146 

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the period for:

 

 

 

 

Interest

$

2,626 

$

1,326 

Income taxes

 

1,886 

 

250 

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-cash Flow Information:

 

 

 

 

Net decrease in goodwill

 

65 

 

 -

Transfers from loans to real estate owned and other repossessed property

 

2,851 

 

 -

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

7

 


 

 

NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION



The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of DNB Financial Corporation (referred to herein as the "Corporation" or "DNB") and its subsidiary, DNB First, National Association (the "Bank") have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and therefore do not include certain information or footnotes necessary for the presentation of financial condition, statement of operations and statement of cash flows required by generally accepted accounting principles. However, in the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (which consist of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the unaudited periods. Prior amounts not affecting net income are reclassified when necessary to conform to current period classifications. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire year.  The consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Annual Report and report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016



Subsequent Events-- Management has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to June 30, 2017 for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these Consolidated Financial Statements. The evaluation was conducted through the date these financial statements were issued.



Recent Accounting Pronouncements-  

Accounting Developments Affecting DNB In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” The updated standard is a new comprehensive revenue recognition model that requires revenue to be recognized in a manner that depicts the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. During 2016, the FASB issued ASU Nos. 2016-10, 2016-12 and 2016-20 that provide additional guidance related to the identification of performance obligations within a contract, assessing collectability, contract costs, and other technical corrections and improvements. ASU 2014-09 will become effective for the Company for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2017 and for interim periods within the annual period. ASU 2014-09 allows for either full retrospective or modified retrospective adoption. DNB is evaluating the anticipated effects of these ASUs on the Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures. DNB is in the process of determining the revenue streams that are in the scope of these updates. Preliminary results indicate that certain noninterest income financial statement line items, including service charges on deposit accounts, card fees, other charges and fees, investment banking income, trust and investment management income, retail investment services, and other noninterest income, contain revenue streams that are in scope of these updates. Preliminary findings indicate that there may be some changes in the presentation of certain revenues and expenses based on the principal versus agent guidance within these updates; the materiality of these changes is still being assessed. DNB plans to adopt the standards beginning January 1, 2018 and expects to use the modified retrospective method of adoption.



DNB adopted ASU 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement Period Adjustments on a prospective basis. This amendment eliminates the requirement to account for adjustments to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination retrospectively. Instead, the acquirer will recognize the adjustments to provisional amounts during the period in which the adjustments are determined, including the effect on earnings of any amounts the acquirer would have recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. DNB evaluated the impact of this guidance and does not anticipate a material impact to the consolidated financial statements at this time.



In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10) – Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The guidance addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. In particular, the guidance revises an entity’s accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. The guidance also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with fair value of financial instruments. For public business entities, the guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Entities should apply the amendments by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. As of June 30, 2017, DNB did not hold any equity investments (excluding restricted investments in bank stocks).  DNB does not expect to make significant purchases of equity investments; therefore, the adoption of this ASU is not expected to be material to DNB's consolidated financial statements.



In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. DNB has evaluated the provisions of ASU 2016-02 to determine the potential impact of the new standard and has determined that it is not expected to have a material impact on DNB’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. DNB has determined that the provisions of ASU No. 2016-02 may result in an increase in assets to recognize the present value of the lease

8

 


 

 

obligations with a corresponding increase in liabilities. DNB is still in the process of determining the impact on DNB’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

  

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, "Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting." This ASU simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. For public business entities, this ASU is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein. Accordingly, effective January of 2017, DNB adopted the pronouncement.  The adoption of this pronouncement was immaterial to DNB’s consolidated financial statements. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017, DNB had a $2,000 and $153,000 tax benefit for stock option exercises, respectively.

  

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments," (ASU 2016-13), which addresses concerns regarding the perceived delay in recognition of credit losses under the existing incurred loss model. The amendment introduces a new, single model for recognizing credit losses on all financial instruments presented on cost basis. Under the new model, entities must estimate current expected credit losses by considering all available relevant information, including historical and current information, as well as reasonable and supportable forecasts of future events. The update also requires additional qualitative and quantitative information to allow users to better understand the credit risk within the portfolio and the methodologies for determining allowance. ASU 2016-13 is effective for DNB on January 1, 2020 and must be applied using the modified retrospective approach with limited exceptions. Early adoption is permitted. While DNB is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its consolidated financial statements, it currently expects the ALLL to increase upon adoption given that the allowance will be required to cover the full remaining expected life of the portfolio upon adoption, rather than the incurred loss model under current U.S. GAAP. The extent of this increase is still being evaluated and will depend on economic conditions and the composition of DNB’s loan portfolio at the time of adoption.

 

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230). The amendments in this update provide guidance for eight specific cash flow classification issues for which current guidance is unclear or does not exist, thereby reducing diversity in practice. For public companies, the update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. DNB is currently evaluating this ASU, particularly related to cash payments for debt prepayment costs and cash proceeds received from the settlement of BOLI policies as these areas might affect DNB in the future.  This ASU, however, is not expected to have a material impact on DNB's consolidated financial statements because the guidance only affects the classification within the statement of cash flows.



In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805), Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The new guidance narrows the existing definition of a business and provides a framework for evaluating whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition (or disposal) of assets or a business. The guidance requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities (collectively, the set) is not a business. To be considered a business, the set would need to include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs, as defined by the ASU. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods, and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. DNB will apply this guidance to applicable transactions after the adoption date.



In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The ASU simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Instead, under the amendments, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value with its carrying amount. Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. The update also eliminated the requirements for zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. The amendments are effective for public business entities for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. DNB plans to early adopt this ASU for its annual goodwill impairment test at the end of 2017 by comparing its fair value to its carrying value.  The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on DNB’s consolidated financial statements.    Goodwill was reduced by $65,000 to $15,525,000 during the first quarter of 2017 due to the sale of an ASC 310-30 acquired commercial mortgage with credit deterioration. 



In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, “Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.” Under the new guidance, employers will present the service cost component of the net periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line item (e.g., Salaries and Benefits) as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. In addition, only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization in assets. Employers will present the other components separately (e.g., Other Noninterest Expense) from the line item that includes the service cost. ASU No. 2017-07 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, however, DNB has decided not to early adopt. Employers will apply the guidance on the presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost in the income statement retrospectively. ASU No. 2017-07 is not expected to have a material impact on DNB Consolidated Financial Statements because the Pension plan has been frozen to new accruals since December 31, 2003, and thus, generated no service cost in any subsequent year).

9

 


 

 



In March of 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities  (ASU 2017-08). This guidance shortens the amortization period for premiums on certain callable debt securities to the earliest call date (with an explicit, non-contingent call feature that is callable at a fixed price and on a preset dates), rather than contractual maturity date as currently required under GAAP. The ASU does not impact instruments without preset call dates such as mortgage-backed securities.  For instruments with contingent call features, once the contingency is resolved and the security is callable at a fixed price and preset date, the security is within the scope of the ASU.  ASU 2017-08 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is permitted. Accordingly, effective January of 2017, DNB early adopted the pronouncement.  DNB’s current accounting treatment is consistent with the provisions in ASU-2017-08.  As a result, there was no impact to the consolidated financial statements.

10

 


 

 

NOTE 2: INVESTMENT SECURITIES



The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities, as of the dates indicated, are summarized as follows:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

June 30, 2017



Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

Unrealized

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Cost

 

Gains

 

Losses

 

Fair Value

Held To Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US Government agency obligations

$

8,352 

 

 

$

276 

 

 

$

 -

 

 

$

8,628 

 

Government Sponsored Entities (GSE) mortgage-backed securities

 

547 

 

 

 

14 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

561 

 

Corporate bonds

 

14,108 

 

 

 

270 

 

 

 

(1)

 

 

 

14,377 

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE

 

1,693 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(15)

 

 

 

1,681 

 

State and municipal taxable

 

1,008 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

1,011 

 

State and municipal tax-exempt

 

41,541 

 

 

 

90 

 

 

 

(501)

 

 

 

41,130 

 

Total

$

67,249 

 

 

$

656 

 

 

$

(517)

 

 

$

67,388 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available For Sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US Government agency obligations

$

53,301 

 

 

$

 -

 

 

$

(222)

 

 

$

53,079 

 

GSE mortgage-backed securities

 

31,719 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

(587)

 

 

 

31,132 

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE

 

13,270 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

(386)

 

 

 

12,884 

 

Corporate bonds

 

11,033 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(150)

 

 

 

10,888 

 

State and municipal tax-exempt

 

1,996 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

(79)

 

 

 

1,917 

 

Total

$

111,319 

 

 

$

 

 

$

(1,424)

 

 

$

109,900 

 







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

December 31, 2016



Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

Unrealized

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Cost

 

Gains

 

Losses

 

Fair Value

Held To Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US Government agency obligations

$

8,224 

 

 

$

309 

 

 

$

 -

 

 

$

8,533 

 

Government Sponsored Entities (GSE) mortgage-backed securities

 

1,440 

 

 

 

38 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

1,478 

 

Corporate bonds

 

12,825 

 

 

 

230 

 

 

 

(63)

 

 

 

12,992 

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE

 

1,966 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(22)

 

 

 

1,946 

 

State and municipal taxable

 

1,008 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

1,014 

 

State and municipal tax-exempt

 

41,559 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,406)

 

 

 

40,161 

 

Total

$

67,022 

 

 

$

593 

 

 

$

(1,491)

 

 

$

66,124 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available For Sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US Government agency obligations

$

52,428 

 

 

$

31 

 

 

$

(150)

 

 

$

52,309 

 

GSE mortgage-backed securities

 

30,861 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(723)

 

 

 

30,140 

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE

 

12,957 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(387)

 

 

 

12,573 

 

Corporate bonds

 

15,474 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(299)

 

 

 

15,180 

 

State and municipal tax-exempt

 

5,084 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

(128)

 

 

 

4,956 

 

Asset-backed security

 

26 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

26 

 

Total

$

116,830 

 

 

$

41 

 

 

$

(1,687)

 

 

$

115,184 

 



Included in unrealized losses are market losses on securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more and those securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months. The following table details the aggregate unrealized losses and aggregate fair value of the underlying securities whose fair values are below their amortized cost at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

11

 


 

 







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



June 30, 2017



 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

Unrealized

 

Fair Value

 

Unrealized



 

 

Total

 

Impaired

 

Loss

 

Impaired

 

Loss



Total

 

Unrealized

 

Less Than

 

Less Than

 

More Than

 

More Than

(Dollars in thousands)

Fair Value

 

Loss

 

12 Months

 

12 Months

 

12 Months

 

12 Months

Held To Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

$

500 

 

 

$

(1)

 

 

$

500 

 

 

$

(1)

 

 

$

 -

 

 

$

 -

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE

 

957 

 

 

 

(15)

 

 

 

957 

 

 

 

(15)

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

State and municipal tax-exempt

 

17,163 

 

 

 

(501)

 

 

 

17,163 

 

 

 

(501)

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

Total

$

18,620 

 

 

$

(517)

 

 

$

18,620 

 

 

$

(517)

 

 

$

 -

 

 

$

 -

 

Available For Sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US Government agency obligations

$

50,079 

 

 

$

(222)

 

 

$

50,079 

 

 

$

(222)

 

 

$

 -

 

 

$

 -

 

GSE mortgage-backed securities

 

31,132 

 

 

 

(587)

 

 

 

31,132 

 

 

 

(587)

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE

 

12,884 

 

 

 

(386)

 

 

 

5,920 

 

 

 

(98)

 

 

 

6,964 

 

 

 

(288)

 

Corporate bonds

 

8,260 

 

 

 

(150)

 

 

 

3,801 

 

 

 

(92)

 

 

 

4,459 

 

 

 

(58)

 

State and municipal tax-exempt

 

1,917 

 

 

 

(79)

 

 

 

1,917 

 

 

 

(79)

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

Total

$

104,272 

 

 

$

(1,424)

 

 

$

92,849 

 

 

$

(1,078)

 

 

$

11,423 

 

 

$

(346)

 







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



December 31, 2016



 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

Unrealized

 

Fair Value

 

Unrealized



 

 

Total

 

Impaired

 

Loss

 

Impaired

 

Loss



Total

 

Unrealized

 

Less Than

 

Less Than

 

More Than

 

More Than

(Dollars in thousands)

Fair Value

 

Loss

 

12 Months

 

12 Months

 

12 Months

 

12 Months

Held To Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

$

5,962 

 

 

$

(63)

 

 

$

3,992 

 

 

$

(39)

 

 

$

1,970 

 

 

$

(24)

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE

 

1,104 

 

 

 

(22)

 

 

 

1,104 

 

 

 

(22)

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

State and municipal tax-exempt

 

32,690 

 

 

 

(1,406)

 

 

 

32,690 

 

 

 

(1,406)

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

Total

$

39,756 

 

 

$

(1,491)

 

 

$

37,786 

 

 

$

(1,467)

 

 

$

1,970 

 

 

$

(24)

 

Available For Sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US Government agency obligations

$

27,270 

 

 

$

(150)

 

 

$

27,270 

 

 

$

(150)

 

 

$

 -

 

 

$

 -

 

GSE mortgage-backed securities

 

29,145 

 

 

 

(723)

 

 

 

29,145 

 

 

 

(723)

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE

 

12,116 

 

 

 

(387)

 

 

 

4,868 

 

 

 

(94)

 

 

 

7,248 

 

 

 

(293)

 

Corporate bonds

 

13,031 

 

 

 

(299)

 

 

 

7,593 

 

 

 

(218)

 

 

 

5,438 

 

 

 

(81)

 

State and municipal tax-exempt

 

4,956 

 

 

 

(128)

 

 

 

4,956 

 

 

 

(128)

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

Asset-backed security

 

26 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

26 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

Total

$

86,544 

 

 

$

(1,687)

 

 

$

73,858 

 

 

$

(1,313)

 

 

$

12,686 

 

 

$

(374)

 



As of June 30, 2017, there were eighteen collateralized mortgage obligations GSE, seventeen GSE mortgage-backed securities, ten U.S. agency obligations, twenty-eight tax-exempt municipalities, and six corporate bonds which were in an unrealized loss position. DNB does not intend to sell these securities and management of DNB does not expect to be required to sell any of these securities prior to a recovery of its cost basis. Management has reviewed all of these securities and believes that DNB will collect all principal and interest that is due on debt securities on a timely basis.  Management does not believe any individual unrealized loss as of June 30, 2017 represents an other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI). DNB reviews its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis reviewing each investment for OTTI. The OTTI analysis focuses on condition of the issuers as well as duration and severity of impairment in determining OTTI. As of June 30, 2017, the following securities were reviewed:

Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE  There are eighteen impaired securities classified as collateralized mortgage obligations, ten of which have been impaired for more than 12 months. The largest unrealized loss of a security in this group is 5.11% of its book value. All of these securities were issued and insured by FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA. DNB receives monthly principal and interest payments on all of these securities on a timely basis and none of these agencies have ever defaulted on mortgage-backed principal or interest. DNB anticipates a recovery in the market value as the securities approach their maturity dates or if interest rates decline from June 30, 2017 levels. Management concluded that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2017.

GSE mortgage-backed securities  There are seventeen impaired securities classified as GSE mortgage-backed securities, all of which have been impaired for less than 12 months. The largest unrealized loss of a security in this group is 2.58% of its book value. These securities were issued and insured by FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA. DNB receives monthly principal and interest payments on these securities on a timely basis and none of these have ever defaulted on mortgage-backed principal or interest. DNB anticipates a recover in the market value as the securities approach their maturity dates or if interest rates decline from June 30, 2017 levels. Management concluded that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2017.

12

 


 

 

US Government agency obligations  There are ten impaired securities classified as agencies, none of which have been impaired for more than 12 months. The largest unrealized loss of a security in this group is 1.83% of its book value. All of these securities were issued and insured by FHLB, FNMA, or FHLMC. DNB has received timely interest payments on all of these securities and none of these agencies have ever defaulted on their bonds. DNB anticipates a recovery in the market value as the securities approach their maturity dates. Management concluded that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2017.  

State and municipal tax-exempt There are twenty-eight impaired securities in this category, which are comprised of intermediate to long-term municipal bonds, all of which have been impaired for less than 12 months. The largest unrealized loss of a security in this group is 4.96% of its book value. All of the issues carry a “BBB-” or better underlying credit rating and/or have strong underlying fundamentals; included but not limited to annual financial reports, geographic location, population and debt ratios. In certain cases, options for calls reduce the effective duration and in turn, future market value fluctuations. All issues are performing and are expected to continue to perform in accordance with their respective contractual terms and conditions. There have not been disruptions of any payments associated with any of these municipal securities. These bonds are investment grade and the value decline is related to the changes in interest rates. Of the twenty-eight municipal securities, there are eight insured school districts, nine uninsured school districts, four insured townships, and seven uninsured townships, all of which have strong underlying ratings. Management concluded that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2017.

Corporate bonds There are six impaired bonds classified as corporate bonds, three of which have been impaired for more than 12 months. The largest unrealized loss of a security in this group is 4.17% of its book value. The bonds are investment grade and the value decline is related to the changes in interest rates that occurred since the time of purchase and subsequent changes in spreads affecting the market prices. All of the issues carry a "BBB+" or better underlying credit support and were evaluated on the basis on their underlying fundamentals; included but not limited to annual financial reports, rating agency reports, capital strength and debt ratios. DNB anticipates a recovery in the market value as the securities approach their maturity dates or if interest rates decline from June 30, 2017 levels. Management concluded that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2017.

The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities as of June 30, 2017, by final contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain securities may be called or prepaid without penalties.









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Held to Maturity

 

Available for Sale

(Dollars in thousands)

Amortized Cost

Fair Value

 

Amortized Cost

Fair Value

Due in one year or less

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

 

$

15,222 

 

$

15,214 

 

Due after one year through five years

 

26,086 

 

 

26,585 

 

 

 

42,350 

 

 

42,134 

 

Due after five years through ten years

 

27,031 

 

 

27,055 

 

 

 

11,921 

 

 

11,728 

 

Due after ten years

 

14,132 

 

 

13,748 

 

 

 

41,826 

 

 

40,824 

 

Total investment securities

$

67,249 

 

$

67,388 

 

 

$

111,319 

 

$

109,900 

 



The HTM security sold during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was sold in accordance with GAAP, as DNB collected greater than 85% of the original recorded investment on the HTM security prior to the sale. As a result, it is appropriate to continue to carry the remaining HTM portfolio as currently classified. Gains and losses resulting from investment sales, redemptions or calls were as follows:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended



June 30,

 

June 30,

(Dollars in thousands)

2017

2016

 

2017

2016

Gross realized gains-AFS

$

10 

 

$

203 

 

 

$

10 

 

$

264 

 

Gross realized gains-HTM

 

16 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

16 

 

 

 -

 

Gross realized losses-AFS

 

(1)

 

 

 -

 

 

 

(1)

 

 

(30)

 

Net realized gain

$

25 

 

$

203 

 

 

$

25 

 

$

234 

 



At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, investment securities with a carrying value of approximately $118.2 million and $116.7 million, respectively, were pledged to secure public funds, repurchase agreements and for other purposes as required by law.

13

 


 

 

NOTE 3: LOANS



The following table sets forth information concerning the composition of total loans outstanding, as of the dates indicated.





 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2017

 

December 31, 2016

Residential mortgage

$

86,632 

 

 

$

87,581 

 

Commercial mortgage

 

453,453 

 

 

 

465,486 

 

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

118,490 

 

 

 

123,175 

 

Commercial construction

 

92,157 

 

 

 

72,755 

 

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

59,829 

 

 

 

62,560 

 

Other

 

5,964 

 

 

 

5,972 

 

Total loans

$

816,525 

 

 

$

817,529 

 

Less allowance for credit losses

 

(5,267)

 

 

 

(5,373)

 

Net loans

$

811,258 

 

 

$

812,156 

 



Information concerning non-accrual loans is shown in the following tables:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

Interest income that would have been recorded under original terms

Interest income recorded during the period

Net impact on interest income

Interest income that would have been recorded under original terms

Interest income recorded during the period

Net impact on interest income

Non-accrual loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage

$

1,815 

$

1,770 

$

21 

$

 -

$

21 

$

42 

$

 -

$

42 

Commercial mortgage

 

2,375 

 

4,593 

 

36 

 

 -

 

36 

 

77 

 

 -

 

77 

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

1,510 

 

198 

 

28 

 

 -

 

28 

 

66 

 

 -

 

66 

Commercial construction

 

447 

 

1,242 

 

46 

 

 -

 

46 

 

91 

 

 -

 

91 

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

404 

 

442 

 

 

 -

 

 

12 

 

 -

 

12 

Other

 

311 

 

256 

 

 

 -

 

 

12 

 

 -

 

12 

Total non-accrual loans

$

6,862 

$

8,501 

$

144 

$

 -

$

144 

$

300 

$

 -

$

300 

Loans 90 days past due and accruing

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

Total non-performing loans

$

6,862 

$

8,501 

$

144 

$

 -

$

144 

$

300 

$

 -

$

300 







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2016

Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

June 30, 2016

Interest income that would have been recorded under original terms

Interest income recorded during the period

Net impact on interest income

Interest income that would have been recorded under original terms

Interest income recorded during the period

Net impact on interest income

Non-accrual loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage

 

 

$

1,772 

$

17 

$

 -

$

17 

$

36 

$

 -

$

36 

Commercial mortgage

 

 

 

3,140 

 

45 

 

 -

 

45 

 

65 

 

 -

 

65 

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

 

 

207 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

Commercial construction

 

 

 

1,524 

 

47 

 

 -

 

47 

 

88 

 

 -

 

88 

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

 

 

564 

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

16 

 

 -

 

16 

Other

 

 

 

222 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

Total non-accrual loans

 

 

$

7,429 

$

124 

$

 -

$

116 

$

220 

$

 -

$

220 

Loans 90 days past due and accruing

 

 

 

162 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

Total non-performing loans

 

 

$

7,591 

$

125 

$

$

116 

$

222 

$

$

220 

 





14

 


 

 

NOTE 4: ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is also monitored by analyzing the age of the loans receivable as determined by the length of time a scheduled payment is past due. The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016



Age Analysis of Past Due Loans Receivable







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2017



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivable



30-59

60-89

Greater

 

 

 

 

Total

> 90



Days Past

Days Past

than

Total

 

 

Loans

Days and

(Dollars in thousands)

Due

Due

90 Days

Past Due

Current

Receivable

Accruing

Residential mortgage (less acquired with credit deterioration)

$

1,626 

$

164 

$

861 

$

2,651 

$

83,970 

$

86,621 

$

 -

Acquired residential mortgage with credit deterioration

 

 -

 

 -

 

11 

 

11 

 

 -

 

11 

 

 -

Commercial mortgage (less acquired with credit deterioration)

 

 -

 

 -

 

985 

 

985 

 

451,133 

 

452,118 

 

 -

Acquired commercial mortgage with credit deterioration

 

 -

 

 -

 

620 

 

620 

 

715 

 

1,335 

 

 -

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

 -

 

 -

 

1,378 

 

1,378 

 

117,112 

 

118,490 

 

 -

Commercial construction

 

1,041 

 

 -

 

447 

 

1,488 

 

90,669 

 

92,157 

 

 -

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

222 

 

87 

 

300 

 

609 

 

59,220 

 

59,829 

 

 -

Other

 

 

99 

 

173 

 

280 

 

5,684 

 

5,964 

 

 -

Total

$

2,897 

$

350 

$

4,775 

$

8,022 

$

808,503 

$

816,525 

$

 -









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2016



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivable



30-59

60-89

Greater

 

 

 

 

Total

> 90



Days Past

Days Past

than

Total

 

Loans

Days and

(Dollars in thousands)

Due

Due

90 Days

Past Due

Current

Receivable

Accruing

Residential mortgage (less acquired with credit deterioration)

$

728 

$

374 

$

491 

$

1,593 

$

85,977 

$

87,570 

$

 -

Acquired residential mortgage with credit deterioration

 

 -

 

 -

 

11 

 

11 

 

 -

 

11 

 

 -

Commercial mortgage (less acquired with credit deterioration)

 

1,202 

 

762 

 

2,169 

 

4,133 

 

459,679 

 

463,812 

 

 -

Acquired commercial mortgage with credit deterioration

 

389 

 

83 

 

673 

 

1,145 

 

529 

 

1,674 

 

 -

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

747 

 

377 

 

23 

 

1,147 

 

122,028 

 

123,175 

 

 -

Commercial construction

 

112 

 

 -

 

1,242 

 

1,354 

 

71,401 

 

72,755 

 

 -

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

263 

 

 -

 

300 

 

563 

 

61,997 

 

62,560 

 

 -

Other

 

27 

 

65 

 

151 

 

243 

 

5,729 

 

5,972 

 

 -

Total

$

3,468 

$

1,661 

$

5,060 

$

10,189 

$

807,340 

$

817,529 

$

 -



DNB had $479,000 of residential mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure and $92,000 of residential mortgage loans in other real estate owned as of June 30, 2017. DNB had no residential mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure and $170,000 of residential mortgage loans in other real estate owned as of December 31, 2016.

15

 


 

 

The following tables summarize information in regards to impaired loans by loan portfolio class as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 and as of December 31, 2016.

Impaired Loans







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

June 30, 2017

 

 

December 31, 2016



Recorded

 

Unpaid

 

Related

 

Recorded

 

Unpaid

 

Related



Investment

 

Principal

 

Allowance

 

Investment

 

Principal

 

Allowance

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

Balance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance

 

 

 

With no related allowance recorded:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage

$

1,595 

 

$

1,894 

 

$

 -

 

$

653 

 

$

680 

 

$

 -

Acquired residential mortgage with credit deterioration

 

11 

 

 

11 

 

 

 -

 

 

11 

 

 

11 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage

 

1,753 

 

 

1,994 

 

 

 -

 

 

2,919 

 

 

3,330 

 

 

 -

Acquired commercial mortgage with credit deterioration

 

1,140 

 

 

1,140 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,674 

 

 

1,680 

 

 

 

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

1,510 

 

 

1,944 

 

 

 -

 

 

22 

 

 

24 

 

 

 -

Commercial construction

 

447 

 

 

2,833 

 

 

 -

 

 

795 

 

 

795 

 

 

 -

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

552 

 

 

571 

 

 

 -

 

 

544 

 

 

595 

 

 

 -

Other

 

75 

 

 

75 

 

 

 -

 

 

114 

 

 

122 

 

 

 -

Total

$

7,083 

 

$

10,462 

 

$

 -

 

$

6,732 

 

$

7,237 

 

$

 -

With allowance recorded:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage

 

209 

 

 

209 

 

 

38 

 

 

1,107 

 

 

1,368 

 

 

143 

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

176 

 

 

196 

 

 

97 

Commercial construction

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

447 

 

 

2,833 

 

 

89 

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

236 

 

 

236 

 

 

29 

 

 

142 

 

 

142 

 

 

Total

$

445 

 

$

445 

 

$

67 

 

$

1,872 

 

$

4,539 

 

$

334 

Total:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage

 

1,804 

 

 

2,103 

 

 

38 

 

 

1,760 

 

 

2,048 

 

 

143 

Acquired residential mortgage with credit deterioration

 

11 

 

 

11 

 

 

 -

 

 

11 

 

 

11 

 

 

 -

Commercial mortgage

 

1,753 

 

 

1,994 

 

 

 -

 

 

2,919 

 

 

3,330 

 

 

 -

Acquired commercial mortgage with credit deterioration

 

1,140 

 

 

1,140 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,674 

 

 

1,680 

 

 

 -

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

1,510 

 

 

1,944 

 

 

 -

 

 

198 

 

 

220 

 

 

97 

Commercial construction

 

447 

 

 

2,833 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,242 

 

 

3,628 

 

 

89 

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

552 

 

 

571 

 

 

 -

 

 

544 

 

 

595 

 

 

 -

Other

 

311 

 

 

311 

 

 

29 

 

 

256 

 

 

264 

 

 

Total

$

7,528 

 

$

10,907 

 

$

67 

 

$

8,604 

 

$

11,776 

 

$

334 



16

 


 

 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Three Months Ended

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

Six Months Ended



 

June 30, 2017

 

 

June 30, 2016

 

 

June 30, 2017

 

 

June 30, 2016



Average

 

Interest

 

Average

 

Interest

 

Average

 

Interest

 

Average

 

Interest



Recorded

 

Income

 

Recorded

 

Income

 

Recorded

 

Income

 

Recorded

 

Income

(Dollars in thousands)

Investment

 

Recognized

 

Investment

 

Recognized

 

Investment

 

Recognized

 

Investment

 

Recognized

With no related allowance recorded:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage

$

1,610 

 

$

 -

 

$

1,284 

 

$

 -

 

$

1,291 

 

$

 -

 

$

1,396 

 

$

 -

Acquired residential mortgage with credit deterioration

 

11 

 

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

11 

 

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Commercial mortgage

 

1,253 

 

 

 -

 

 

2,083 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,808 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,782 

 

 

 -

Acquired commercial mortgage with credit deterioration

 

1,137 

 

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

1,316 

 

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

1,192 

 

 

 -

 

 

24 

 

 

 -

 

 

802 

 

 

 -

 

 

16 

 

 

 -

Commercial construction

 

848 

 

 

 -

 

 

934 

 

 

 -

 

 

830 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,002 

 

 

 -

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

580 

 

 

 

 

671 

 

 

 

 

568 

 

 

 

 

678 

 

 

Other

 

94 

 

 

 -

 

 

104 

 

 

 -

 

 

100 

 

 

 -

 

 

97 

 

 

 -

Total

$

6,725 

 

$

 

$

5,100 

 

$

 

$

6,726 

 

$

 

$

4,971 

 

$

With allowance recorded:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage

 

210 

 

 

 -

 

 

493 

 

 

 -

 

 

509 

 

 

 -

 

 

329 

 

 

 -

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

557 

 

 

 -

 

 

185 

 

 

 -

 

 

430 

 

 

 -

 

 

190 

 

 

 -

Commercial construction

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

447 

 

 

 -

 

 

149 

 

 

 -

 

 

298 

 

 

 -

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

189 

 

 

 -

 

 

107 

 

 

 -

 

 

173 

 

 

 -

 

 

107 

 

 

 -

Total

$

956 

 

$

 -

 

$

1,232 

 

$

 -

 

$

1,261 

 

$

 -

 

$

924 

 

$

 -

Total:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage

 

1,820 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,777 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,800 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,725 

 

 

 -

Acquired residential mortgage with credit deterioration

 

11 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

11 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Commercial mortgage

 

1,253 

 

 

 -

 

 

2,083 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,808 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,782 

 

 

 -

Acquired commercial mortgage with credit deterioration

 

1,137 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

1,316 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

1,749 

 

 

 -

 

 

209 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,232 

 

 

 -

 

 

206 

 

 

 -

Commercial construction

 

848 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,381 

 

 

 -

 

 

979 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,300 

 

 

 -

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

580 

 

 

 

 

671 

 

 

 

 

568 

 

 

 

 

678 

 

 

Other

 

283 

 

 

 -

 

 

211 

 

 

 -

 

 

273 

 

 

 -

 

 

204 

 

 

 -

Total

$

7,681 

 

$

 

$

6,332 

 

$

 

$

7,987 

 

$

 

$

5,895 

 

$



17

 


 

 

The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aggregate pass rating and the classified ratings of special mention, substandard and doubtful within DNB’s internal risk rating system as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Credit Quality Indicators







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



June 30, 2017



 

 

 

Special

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Pass

Mention

Substandard

Doubtful

Total

Residential mortgage

$

84,751 

 

$

 -

 

$

1,881 

 

$

 -

 

$

86,632 

 

Commercial mortgage

 

443,866 

 

 

3,697 

 

 

5,890 

 

 

 -

 

 

453,453 

 

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

114,330 

 

 

657 

 

 

3,503 

 

 

 -

 

 

118,490 

 

Commercial construction

 

91,597 

 

 

 -

 

 

560 

 

 

 -

 

 

92,157 

 

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

59,129 

 

 

 -

 

 

700 

 

 

 -

 

 

59,829 

 

Other

 

5,653 

 

 

 -

 

 

311 

 

 

 -

 

 

5,964 

 

Total

$

799,326 

 

$

4,354 

 

$

12,845 

 

$

 -

 

$

816,525 

 









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



December 31, 2016



 

 

 

Special

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Pass

Mention

Substandard

Doubtful

Total

Residential mortgage

$

85,259 

 

$

 -

 

$

2,322 

 

$

 -

 

$

87,581 

 

Commercial mortgage

 

450,124 

 

 

3,763 

 

 

11,599 

 

 

 -

 

 

465,486 

 

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

116,522 

 

 

591 

 

 

6,062 

 

 

 -

 

 

123,175 

 

Commercial construction

 

71,400 

 

 

 -

 

 

1,355 

 

 

 -

 

 

72,755 

 

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

61,782 

 

 

 -

 

 

778 

 

 

 -

 

 

62,560 

 

Other

 

5,716 

 

 

 -

 

 

256 

 

 

 -

 

 

5,972 

 

Total

$

790,803 

 

$

4,354 

 

$

22,372 

 

$

 -

 

$

817,529 

 



Troubled Debt Restructurings Loans whose terms are modified are classified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”) if DNB grants such borrowers concessions and it is deemed that those borrowers are experiencing financial difficulty. Concessions granted under a troubled debt restructuring generally involve a temporary reduction in interest rate or an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date. Non-accrual troubled debt restructurings are restored to accrual status if principal and interest payments, under the modified terms, are current for six consecutive months after modification. Loans classified as troubled debt restructurings are designated as impaired. The recorded investments in troubled debt restructured loans at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



June 30, 2017



Pre-Modification

 

Post-Modification

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Outstanding Recorded Investment

 

Outstanding Recorded Investment

 

Recorded Investment

Residential mortgage

$

754 

 

 

$

883 

 

 

$

709 

 

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

148 

 

 

 

148 

 

 

 

147 

 

Other

 

40 

 

 

 

42 

 

 

 

39 

 

Total

$

942 

 

 

$

1,073 

 

 

$

895 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



December 31, 2016



Pre-Modification

 

Post-Modification

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Outstanding Recorded Investment

 

Outstanding Recorded Investment

 

Recorded Investment

Residential mortgage

$

754 

 

 

$

883 

 

 

$

726 

 

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

148 

 

 

 

148 

 

 

 

148 

 

Other

 

40 

 

 

 

42 

 

 

 

40 

 

Total

$

942 

 

 

$

1,073 

 

 

$

914 

 



At June 30, 2017, DNB had five TDRs with recorded investment totaling $895,000,  one of which totaled $102,000, represented an accruing impaired home equity loan in compliance with the terms of the modification. The remaining $793,000 represents four loans that were nonaccrual impaired loans and resulted in collateral evaluations. As a result of the evaluations, specific reserves and charge-offs have been taken where appropriate. DNB recognized partial charge-offs totaling $151,000 on two residential loans prior to their

18

 


 

 

restructuring and $2,000 on one consumer installment loan after its restructuring. DNB did not recognize any charge-off on the last remaining TDR. As of June 30, 2017, there were no defaulted TDRs as all TDRs were current with respect to their associated forbearance agreements. There were no defaults on TDRs during the six months ended June 30, 2017.



At December 31, 2016, DNB had five TDRs with recorded investment totaling $914,000,  one of which totaled $102,000, represented an accruing impaired home equity loan in compliance with the terms of the modification. The remaining $812,000 represents four loans that were nonaccrual impaired loans and resulted in collateral evaluations. As a result of the evaluations, specific reserves and charge-offs have been taken where appropriate. As of December 31, 2016, DNB recognized partial charge-offs totaling $151,000 on two residential loans prior to their restructuring and $2,000 on one consumer installment loan after its restructuring. DNB did not recognize any charge-off on the last remaining TDR. As of December 31, 2016, there were no defaulted TDRs as all TDRs were current with respect to their associated forbearance agreements. There were no defaults on TDRs within twelve months of restructure during the six months ended June 30, 2016.



The following tables set forth the composition of DNB’s allowance for credit losses as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 and as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans Receivables





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Residential

Commercial

Commercial

Commercial

Lease

Consumer

Consumer

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Mortgage

Mortgage

Term

Construction

Financing

Home Equity

Other

Unallocated

Total

Allowance for credit losses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance - April 1, 2017

$

247 

$

2,597 

$

774 

$

1,059 

$

 -

$

196 

$

63 

$

482 

$

5,418 

Charge-offs

 

 -

 

(249)

 

(491)

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(740)

Recoveries

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Provisions

 

(2)

 

286 

 

339 

 

149 

 

 -

 

(7)

 

20 

 

(200)

 

585 

Ending balance - June 30, 2017

$

245 

$

2,634 

$

625 

$

1,208 

$

 -

$

189 

$

84 

$

282 

$

5,267 













 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Residential

Commercial

Commercial

Commercial

Lease

Consumer

Consumer

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Mortgage

Mortgage

Term

Construction

Financing

Home Equity

Other

Unallocated

Total

Allowance for credit losses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance - January 1, 2017

$

349 

$

2,531 

$

709 

$

969 

$

 -

$

196 

$

61 

$

558 

$

5,373 

Charge-offs

 

 -

 

(483)

 

(596)

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(10)

 

 -

 

(1,089)

Recoveries

 

 

50 

 

19 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

73 

Provisions

 

(106)

 

536 

 

493 

 

239 

 

(1)

 

(7)

 

32 

 

(276)

 

910 

Ending balance - June 30, 2017

$

245 

$

2,634 

$

625 

$

1,208 

$

 -

$

189 

$

84 

$

282 

$

5,267 

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment

$

38 

$

 -

$

 -

$

 -

$

 -

$

 -

$

29 

$

 -

$

67 

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment

$

207 

$

2,634 

$

625 

$

1,208 

$

 -

$

189 

$

55 

$

282 

$

5,200 

Loans receivables:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ending balance

$

86,632 

$

453,453 

$

118,490 

$

92,157 

$

 -

$

59,829 

$

5,964 

 

 

$

816,525 

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment

$

1,804 

$

1,753 

$

1,510 

$

447 

$

 -

$

552 

$

311 

 

 

$

6,377 

Ending balance: acquired with credit deterioration

$

11 

$

1,140 

$

 -

$

 -

$

 -

$

 -

$

 -

 

 

$

1,151 

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment

$

84,817 

$

450,560 

$

116,980 

$

91,710 

$

 -

$

59,277 

$

5,653 

 

 

$

808,997 

Reserve for unfunded loan commitments included in other liabilities

$

 -

$

$

140 

$

173 

$

 -

$

18 

$

 -

 

 

$

340 









19

 


 

 







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Residential

Commercial

Commercial

Commercial

Lease

Consumer

Consumer

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Mortgage

Mortgage

Term

Construction

Financing

Home Equity

Other

Unallocated

Total

Allowance for credit losses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance - April 1, 2016

$

220 

$

2,376 

$

948 

$

765 

$

 -

$

188 

$

67 

$

608 

$

5,172 

Charge-offs

 

(122)

 

 -

 

(11)

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(133)

Recoveries

 

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Provisions

 

209 

 

(6)

 

(46)

 

101 

 

 -

 

 

(4)

 

(57)

 

200 

Ending balance - June 30, 2016

$

314 

$

2,370 

$

891 

$

866 

$

 -

$

191 

$

64 

$

551 

$

5,247 











 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Residential

Commercial

Commercial

Commercial

Lease

Consumer

Consumer

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Mortgage

Mortgage

Term

Construction

Financing

Home Equity

Other

Unallocated

Total

Allowance for credit losses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance - January 1, 2016

$

216 

$

2,375 

$

989 

$

569 

$

 -

$

195 

$

64 

$

527 

$

4,935 

Charge-offs

 

(206)

 

 -

 

(24)

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

(230)

Recoveries

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

12 

Provisions

 

296 

 

(5)

 

(75)

 

296 

 

(1)

 

(4)

 

(1)

 

24 

 

530 

Ending balance - June 30, 2016

$

314 

$

2,370 

$

891 

$

866 

$

 -

$

191 

$

64 

$

551 

$

5,247 

Reserve for unfunded loan commitments included in other liabilities

$

 -

$

$

117 

$

57 

$

 -

$

13 

$

 -

 

 

$

190 







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Residential

Commercial

Commercial

Commercial

Lease

Consumer

Consumer

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Mortgage

Mortgage

Term

Construction

Financing

Home Equity

Other

Unallocated

Total

Allowance for credit losses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ending balance - December 31, 2016

$

349 

$

2,531 

$

709 

$

969 

$

 -

$

196 

$

61 

$

558 

$

5,373 

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment

$

143 

$

 -

$

97 

$

89 

$

 -

$

 -

$

$

 -

$

334 

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment

$

206 

$

2,531 

$

612 

$

880 

$

 -

$

196 

$

56 

$

558 

$

5,039 

Loans receivables:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ending balance

$

87,581 

$

465,486 

$

123,175 

$

72,755 

$

 -

$

62,560 

$

5,972 

 

 

$

817,529 

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment

$

1,760 

$

2,919 

$

198 

$

1,242 

$

 -

$

544 

$

256 

 

 

$

6,919 

Ending balance: acquired with credit deterioration

$

11 

$

1,674 

$

 -

$

 -

$

 -

$

 -

$

 -

 

 

$

1,685 

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment

$

85,810 

$

460,893 

$

122,977 

$

71,513 

$

 -

$

62,016 

$

5,716 

 

 

$

808,925 

Reserve for unfunded loan commitments included in other liabilities

$

 -

$

$

135 

$

190 

$

 -

$

16 

$

 -

 

 

$

345 



20

 


 

 







NOTE 5: EARNINGS PER SHARE 



Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed using the treasury stock method and reflects the potential dilution that could occur from the exercise of stock options, and warrants and the amortized portion of unvested stock awards. Stock options and unvested stock awards for which the exercise or the grant price exceeds the average market price over the period have an anti-dilutive effect on EPS and, accordingly, are excluded from the calculation. Treasury shares are not deemed outstanding for calculations. There were no outstanding stock warrants, no anti-dilutive stock options outstanding, and no anti-dilutive stock awards outstanding at June 30, 2017 or 2016. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended



June 30, 2017

 

June 30, 2017

(In thousands, except per-share data)

Income

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Income

 

Shares

 

Amount

Basic EPS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income available to common stockholders

$

2,286 

 

 

4,258 

 

$

0.54 

 

 

$

4,727 

 

 

4,252 

 

$

1.11 

 

Effect of potential dilutive common stock equivalents – stock options and  restricted shares

 

 -

 

 

34 

 

 

(0.01)

 

 

 

 -

 

 

31 

 

 

(0.01)

 

Diluted EPS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income available to common stockholders after assumed conversions

$

2,286 

 

 

4,292 

 

$

0.53 

 

 

$

4,727 

 

 

4,283 

 

$

1.10 

 









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended



June 30, 2016

 

June 30, 2016

(In thousands, except per-share data)

Income

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Income

 

Shares

 

Amount

Basic EPS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income available to common stockholders

$

1,109 

 

 

2,849 

 

$

0.39 

 

 

$

2,665 

 

 

2,841 

 

$

0.94 

 

Effect of potential dilutive common stock equivalents – stock options and  restricted shares

 

 -

 

 

34 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

 

35 

 

 

(0.01)

 

Diluted EPS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income available to common stockholders after assumed conversions

$

1,109 

 

 

2,883 

 

$

0.39 

 

 

$

2,665 

 

 

2,876 

 

$

0.93 

 



















NOTE 6: ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS 



The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss included in stockholders' equity are as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Before-Tax

Tax

Net-of-Tax

(Dollars in thousands)

Amount

Effect

Amount

June 30, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized loss on AFS securities

$

(1,419)

 

$

483 

 

$

(936)

 

Discount on AFS to HTM reclassification

 

(1)

 

 

 -

 

 

(1)

 

Unrealized actuarial losses-pension

 

(1,792)

 

 

609 

 

 

(1,183)

 



$

(3,212)

 

$

1,092 

 

$

(2,120)

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized loss on AFS securities

$

(1,646)

 

$

560 

 

$

(1,086)

 

Discount on AFS to HTM reclassification

 

(8)

 

 

 

 

(5)

 

Unrealized actuarial losses-pension

 

(1,792)

 

 

609 

 

 

(1,183)

 



$

(3,446)

 

$

1,172 

 

$

(2,274)

 





21

 


 

 

NOTE 7: SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES, NOTES, AND OTHER BORROWINGS



DNB has two issuances of junior subordinated debentures (the “debentures”) as follows. The majority of the proceeds of each issuance were invested in DNB’s subsidiary, DNB First, National Association, to increase the Bank’s capital levels. The junior subordinated debentures issued in each case qualify as a component of capital for regulatory purposes. DNB Capital Trust I and II are special purpose Delaware business trusts, which are not consolidated.

DNB Capital Trust I

DNB’s first issuance of junior subordinated debentures was on July 20, 2001. These debentures are floating rate and were issued to DNB Capital Trust I, a Delaware business trust in which DNB owns all of the common equity. DNB Capital Trust I issued $5.0 million of floating rate (6 month Libor plus 3.75%, with a cap of 12%) capital preferred securities to a qualified institutional buyer. The proceeds of these securities were used by the Trust, along with DNB’s capital contribution, to purchase $5.2 million principal amount of DNB’s floating rate junior subordinated debentures. The preferred securities have been redeemable since July 25, 2006 and must be redeemed upon maturity of the debentures on July 25, 2031.

DNB Capital Trust II

DNB’s second issuance of junior subordinated debentures was on March 30, 2005. These are floating rate and were issued to DNB Capital Trust II, a Delaware business trust in which DNB owns all of the common equity. DNB Capital Trust II issued $4.0 million of floating rate (the rate was fixed at 6.56% for the first 5 years and is now adjusting at a rate of 3-month LIBOR plus 1.77%) capital preferred securities. The proceeds of these securities were used by the Trust, along with DNB’s capital contribution, to purchase $4.1 million principal amount of DNB’s floating rate junior subordinated debentures. The preferred securities have been redeemable since May 23, 2010. The preferred securities must be redeemed upon maturity of the debentures on May 23, 2035.



Subordinated Note

On March 5, 2015, DNB Financial Corporation entered into a Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with an accredited investor under which DNB issued a $9.75 million subordinated note (the “Note”) to the investor. The Note has a maturity date of March 6, 2025, and bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.25% per annum for the first 5 years and then will float at the Wall Street Journal Prime rate plus 1.00%, provided that the interest rate applicable to the outstanding principal balance will at no time be less than 3.0% and more than 5.75% per annum.

 

DNB may, at its option, beginning with the first interest payment date after March 6, 2019, and on any interest payment date thereafter, redeem the Note, in whole or in part, at par plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The Note is not subject to repayment at the option of the noteholder.

 

The Note is unsecured and ranks junior in right of payment to DNB’s senior indebtedness and to DNB’s obligations to its general creditors and qualifies as Tier 2 capital for regulatory purposes.



Repurchase Agreements Accounted for as Secured Borrowings



Repurchase agreements accounted for as secured borrowings are shown in the following table.







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Overnight and Continuous

 

Up to 30 days

 

30 - 90 days

 

Greater than 90 days

 

Total

June 30, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchase agreements and repurchase-to-maturity transactions

$

15,700 

 

 

$

 -

 

 

$

 -

 

 

$

 -

 

 

$

15,700 

 

Gross amount of recognized liabilities for repurchase agreements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in statement of condition

$

15,700 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

15,700 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchase agreements and repurchase-to-maturity transactions

$

11,889 

 

 

$

 -

 

 

$

 -

 

 

$

 -

 

 

$

11,889 

 

Gross amount of recognized liabilities for repurchase agreements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in statement of condition

$

11,889 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

11,889 

 



As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, DNB had $15.7 million and $11.9 million of repurchase agreements, respectively. In conjunction with these repurchase agreements, $16.0 million and $12.1 million of state and municipal securities were sold on an overnight basis as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, which represents 102% of the repurchase agreement amounts.



22

 


 

 

NOTE 8: STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION



Stock Option Plan



DNB has a Stock Option Plan for employees and directors. Under the plan, options (both qualified and non-qualified) to purchase a maximum of 793,368 (as adjusted for subsequent stock dividends) shares of DNB’s common stock could be issued to employees and directors. Under the plan, option exercise prices must equal the fair market value of the shares on the date of option grant and the option exercise period may not exceed ten years. Vesting of options under the plan is determined by the Plan Committee. There were 354,090 shares available for grant at June 30, 2017. All options are immediately exercisable. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, DNB had no expenses related to the plan. DNB has no anticipated additional expense related to the plan. Under the Stock Option Plan, 18,850 shares were exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The shares awarded from the NQ cashless exercises resulted in an increase in shares outstanding of 9,132 shares. There was a cash equivalent of 9,718 shares used to pay all applicable taxes on the transactions. Stock option activity is indicated below.







 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



Number

Weighted Average



Outstanding

Exercise Price

Outstanding January 1, 2017

 

49,700 

 

$

9.18 

 

Issued

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Exercised

 

18,850 

 

 

7.34 

 

Forfeited

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Expired

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Outstanding June 30, 2017

 

30,850 

 

$

10.31 

 







 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



Number

Weighted Average



Outstanding

Exercise Price

Outstanding January 1, 2016

 

64,500 

 

$

8.67 

 

Issued

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Exercised

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Forfeited

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Expired

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Outstanding June 30, 2016

 

64,500 

 

$

8.67 

 



The weighted-average price and weighted average remaining contractual life for the outstanding options are listed in the following table for the dates indicated. 









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2017

Range of

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

Exercise

Number

Number

Exercise

Remaining

Intrinsic

Prices

Outstanding

Exercisable

Price

Contractual Life

Value

$

6.93-10.99

30,850 

30,850 

$

10.31 

1.45 years

$

678,000 







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

Range of

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

Exercise

Number

Number

Exercise

Remaining

Intrinsic

Prices

Outstanding

Exercisable

Price

Contractual Life

Value

$

6.93-10.99

49,700 

49,700 

$

9.18 

1.40 years

$

955,000 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Stock-Based Compensation



DNB maintains an Incentive Equity and Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan provides that up to 243,101 (as adjusted for subsequent stock dividends) shares of common stock may be granted, at the discretion of the Board, to individuals of the Corporation. Shares already granted are issuable on the earlier of three or four years (cliff vesting period) after the date of the grant or a change in control of DNB if the recipients are then employed by DNB (“Vest Date”).  Upon issuance of the shares, resale of the shares is restricted for an additional one year, during which the shares may not be sold, pledged or otherwise disposed of. Prior to the Vest Date and in the event the recipient terminates association with DNB for reasons other than death, disability or change in control, the recipient forfeits all rights to the shares that would otherwise be issued under the grant.



Share awards granted by the Plan were recorded at the date of award based on the market value of shares.  Awards are being amortized to expense over a three or four year cliff-vesting period. DNB records compensation expense equal to the value of the shares being amortized. For the three and six month period ended June 30, 2017,  $107,000 and $214,000 was amortized to expense. For the three and six month period ended June 30, 2016, $70,000 and $730,000 was amortized to expense.



23

 


 

 

DNB issued 3,000 restricted stock awards during the first quarter of 2016 and 26,595 restricted stock awards in December 2015 that required the award recipient to hold the shares for one additional year after vesting. These awards cliff vest in three years. For these shares, DNB adopted the Chaffe Model to measure the fair value by applying a 9.1% discount due to the lack of marketability when these transactions took place. The input assumptions used and resulting fair values were an expected life of 5 years, volatility of 19.37%, annual rate of quarterly dividends of 1.01%, and bond equivalent yield of 1.742%.



As of June 30, 2017, there was approximately $815,000 in additional compensation that will be recognized over the remaining service period of approximately 1.75 years. At June 30, 2017,  64,929 shares were reserved for future grants under the Plan. 



During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the shares awarded from the vesting resulted in an increase in shares outstanding of 18,079. There was a cash equivalent of 15,621 shares used to pay all applicable taxes on the transactions.  There were no such transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2017. Stock grant activity is indicated below:







 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 



 

Weighted Average



Shares

Stock Price

Non-vested stock awards—January 1, 2017

55,775 

$

25.63 

 

Granted

500 

 

34.00 

 

Forfeited

90 

 

23.99 

 

Vested

 -

 

 -

 

Non-vested stock awards—June 30, 2017

56,185 

$

25.70 

 









 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 



 

Weighted Average



Shares

Stock Price

Non-vested stock awards—January 1, 2016

77,255 

$

22.71 

 

Granted

3,000 

 

28.75 

 

Forfeited

 -

 

 -

 

Vested

33,700 

 

23.66 

 

Non-vested stock awards—June 30, 2016

46,555 

$

22.42 

 





NOTE 9:  INCOME TAXES    



As of June 30, 2017, DNB had no material unrecognized tax benefits or accrued interest and penalties. It is DNB’s policy to account for interest and penalties accrued relative to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.  Federal and state tax years 2013 through 2016 were open for examination as of June 30, 2017.





24

 


 

 

NOTE 10:  FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 



FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the nature of data inputs for fair value determinations, under which DNB is required to value each asset within its scope using assumptions that market participations would utilize to value that asset. When DNB uses its own assumptions, it is required to disclose additional information about the assumptions used and the effect of the measurement on earnings or the net change in assets for the period.

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB ASC Topic 820 are as follows:

Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.

Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

Level 3—Instruments whose significant value drivers are unobservable.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value is set forth below:

DNB’s available-for-sale investment securities, which generally include U.S. government agencies and mortgage backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, corporate bonds and equity securities are reported at fair value. These securities are valued by an independent third party (“preparer”). The preparer’s evaluations are based on market data. They utilize evaluated pricing models that vary by asset and incorporate available trade, bid and other market information. For securities that do not trade on a daily basis, their evaluated pricing applications apply available information such as benchmarking and matrix pricing. The market inputs normally sought in the evaluation of securities include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes (only obtained from market makers or broker/dealers recognized as market participants), issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bid, offers and reference data. For certain securities additional inputs may be used or some market inputs may not be applicable. Inputs are prioritized differently on any given day based on market conditions.

U.S. Government agencies are evaluated and priced using multi‑dimensional relational models and option adjusted spreads. State and municipal securities are evaluated on a series of matrices including reported trades and material event notices. Mortgage backed securities are evaluated using matrix correlation to treasury or floating index benchmarks, prepayment speeds, monthly payment information and other benchmarks. Other securities are evaluated using a broker-quote based application, including quotes from issuers.

Impaired loans are those loans that the Bank has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.

OREO assets are adjusted to fair value less estimated selling costs upon transfer of the loans to OREO establishing a new cost basis. Subsequently, OREO assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. There assets are included as Level 3 fair values.

25

 


 

 

The following table summarizes the assets at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 that are recognized on DNB’s statement of financial condition using fair value measurement determined based on the differing levels of input:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

June 30, 2017



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Fair Value

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AFS Investment Securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US Government agency obligations

$

 -

$

53,079 

$

 -

$

53,079 

GSE mortgage-backed securities

 

 -

 

31,132 

 

 -

 

31,132 

Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE

 

 -

 

12,884 

 

 -

 

12,884 

Corporate bonds

 

 -

 

10,888 

 

 -

 

10,888 

State and municipal tax-exempt

 

 -

 

1,917 

 

 -

 

1,917 

Total

$

 -

$

109,900 

$

 -

$

109,900 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired loans

$

 -

$

 -

$

1,867 

$

1,867 

OREO and other repossessed property

 

 -

 

 -

 

1,175 

 

1,175 

Total

$

 -

$

 -

$

3,042 

$

3,042 









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

December 31, 2016



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Fair Value

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AFS Investment Securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US Government agency obligations

$

 -

$

52,309 

$

 -

$

52,309 

GSE mortgage-backed securities

 

 -

 

30,140 

 

 -

 

30,140 

Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE

 

 -

 

12,573 

 

 -

 

12,573 

Corporate bonds

 

 -

 

15,180 

 

 -

 

15,180 

State and municipal tax-exempt

 

 -

 

4,956 

 

 -

 

4,956 

Asset-backed security

 

 -

 

26 

 

 -

 

26 

Total

$

 -

$

115,184 

$

 -

$

115,184 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired loans

$

 -

$

 -

$

1,538 

$

1,538 

OREO and other repossessed property

 

 -

 

 -

 

2,485 

 

2,485 

Total

$

 -

$

 -

$

4,023 

$

4,023 



26

 


 

 

The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which DNB has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2017

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurement

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Fair Value

Valuation

 

Range

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Estimate

Techniques

Unobservable Input

(Weighted Average)

Impaired loans - Residential mortgage

$

171 

Appraisal of

Appraisal adj. (2)

0% 

to

0%  (0%)



 

 

collateral (1)

Disposal costs (2)

-8%

to

-8%

(-8%)

Impaired loans - Commercial term

 

1,489 

Appraisal of

Appraisal adj. (2)

0% 

to

-50%

(-7%)



 

 

collateral (1)

Disposal costs (2)

0% 

to

-9%

(-8%)

Impaired loans - Consumer other

 

207 

Appraisal of

Appraisal adj. (2)

0% 

to

0%  (0%)



 

 

collateral (1)

Disposal costs (2)

-8%

to

-8%

(-8%)

Impaired loan total

$

1,867 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other real estate owned

$

1,175 

 

Disposal costs (2)

8% 

to

8% 

(-8%)

(1)



(2)





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurement

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Fair Value

Valuation

 

Range

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Estimate

Techniques

Unobservable Input

(Weighted Average)

Impaired loans - Residential mortgage

$

964 

Appraisal of

Appraisal adj. (2)

0% 

to

-25%

(-22%)



 

 

collateral (1)

Disposal costs (2)

-8%

to

-12%

(-9%)

Impaired loans - Commercial term

 

79 

Appraisal of

Appraisal adj. (2)

-72%

to

-72%

(-72%)



 

 

collateral (1)

Disposal costs (2)

-11%

to

-11%

(-11%)

Impaired loans - Commercial construction

 

358 

Appraisal of

Appraisal adj. (2)

0% 

to

0%  (0%)



 

 

collateral (1)

Disposal costs (2)

-8%

to

-8%

(-8%)

Impaired loans - Consumer other

 

137 

Appraisal of

Appraisal adj. (2)

0% 

to

0%  (0%)



 

 

collateral (1)

Disposal costs (2)

-8%

to

-8%

(-8%)

Impaired loan total

$

1,538 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other real estate owned

$

2,485 

 

Disposal costs (2)

-8%

to

-8%

(-8%)

(1)

Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals or sales contracts of the underlying collateral, which generally include various level 3 inputs which are not identifiable.

(2)

Appraisals are adjusted by management for qualitative factors and disposal costs.

Impaired loans.  Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $7.5 million at June 30, 2017. Of this, $445,000 had specific valuation allowances of $67,000, leaving a fair value of $387,000 as of June 30, 2017.  In addition, DNB had $1.9 million in impaired loans that were partially charged down by $406,000, leaving $1.5 million at fair value as of June 30, 2017. Impaired loans had a carrying amount of $8.6 million at December 31, 2016. Of this, $1.9 million had specific valuation allowances of $334,000, leaving a fair value of $1.5 million at December 31, 2016.  DNB did not have any impaired loans that were partially charged down during the year ended December 31, 2016. 

Other Real Estate Owned & other repossessed property.  Other real estate owned (“OREO”) consists of properties acquired as a result of, or in-lieu-of, foreclosure. Properties or other assets are classified as OREO and other repossessed property are initially recorded at fair value less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value, less estimated costs to sell. Costs relating to the development or improvement of the assets are capitalized and costs relating to holding the assets are charged to expense. DNB had $5.4 million of such assets at June 30, 2017, $5.2 million of which was OREO and $107,000 was in other repossessed property. DNB had $2.8 million of such assets at December 31, 2016, which consisted of $2.6 million in OREO and $191,000 in other repossessed property. Subsequent to the repossession of these assets, DNB wrote down the carrying value of one OREO property by $102,000 to $1.2 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2017.  DNB did not write down the carrying values of OREO during the six month period ended June 30, 2016. 

27

 


 

 

DNB's policy is to recognize transfer between levels as of the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. There were no transfers between Level 1 and 2 for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Below is management’s estimate of the fair value of all financial instruments, whether carried at cost or fair value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

June 30, 2017



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Amount

 

Value

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

Financial assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

36,189 

$

36,189 

$

36,189 

$

 -

$

 -

AFS investment securities

 

109,900 

 

109,900 

 

 -

 

109,900 

 

 -

HTM investment securities

 

67,249 

 

67,388 

 

 -

 

65,388 

 

2,000 

Restricted stock

 

6,566 

 

6,566 

 

 -

 

6,566 

 

 -

Loans, net of allowance, including impaired

 

811,258 

 

791,963 

 

 -

 

 -

 

791,963 

Accrued interest receivable

 

3,558 

 

3,558 

 

 -

 

3,558 

 

 -

Financial liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-interest-bearing deposits

 

181,529 

 

181,529 

 

 -

 

181,529 

 

 -

Interest-bearing deposits

 

534,609 

 

534,609 

 

 -

 

534,609 

 

 -

Time deposits

 

147,110 

 

146,425 

 

 -

 

146,425 

 

 -

Brokered deposits

 

29,811 

 

30,659 

 

 -

 

30,659 

 

 -

Repurchase agreements

 

15,700 

 

15,700 

 

 -

 

15,700 

 

 -

FHLBP advances

 

49,869 

 

49,845 

 

 -

 

49,845 

 

 -

Junior subordinated debentures and other borrowings

 

9,279 

 

9,012 

 

 -

 

9,012 

 

 -

Subordinated debt

 

9,750 

 

11,295 

 

 -

 

11,295 

 

 -

Accrued interest payable

 

552 

 

552 

 

 -

 

552 

 

 -

Off-balance sheet instruments

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



28

 


 

 







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

December 31, 2016



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Amount

 

Value

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

Financial assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

22,103 

$

22,103 

$

22,103 

$

 -

$

 -

AFS investment securities

 

115,184 

 

115,184 

 

 -

 

115,184 

 

 -

HTM investment securities

 

67,022 

 

66,124 

 

 -

 

64,124 

 

2,000 

Restricted stock

 

5,381 

 

5,381 

 

 -

 

5,381 

 

 -

Loans, net of allowance, including impaired

 

812,156 

 

792,190 

 

 -

 

 -

 

792,190 

Accrued interest receivable

 

3,567 

 

3,567 

 

 -

 

3,567 

 

 -

Financial liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-interest-bearing deposits

 

173,467 

 

173,467 

 

 -

 

173,467 

 

 -

Interest-bearing deposits

 

495,178 

 

495,178 

 

 -

 

495,178 

 

 -

Time deposits

 

187,256 

 

186,012 

 

 -

 

186,012 

 

 -

Brokered deposits

 

29,286 

 

28,873 

 

 -

 

28,873 

 

 -

Repurchase agreements

 

11,889 

 

11,889 

 

 -

 

11,889 

 

 -

FHLBP advances

 

55,332 

 

54,734 

 

 -

 

54,734 

 

 -

Junior subordinated debentures and other borrowings

 

9,279 

 

8,637 

 

 -

 

8,637 

 

 -

Subordinated debt

 

9,750 

 

10,493 

 

 -

 

10,493 

 

 -

Accrued interest payable

 

534 

 

534 

 

 -

 

534 

 

 -

Off-balance sheet instruments

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

The specific estimation methods and assumptions used can have a substantial impact on the resulting fair values of financial instruments. Following is a brief summary of the significant assumptions, methods, and estimates used in estimating fair value.

Limitations  Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time DNB’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of DNB’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Accrued Interest Receivable and Accrued Interest Payable  The carrying amounts for short-term investments (cash and cash equivalents) and accrued interest receivable and payable approximate fair value.

Investment Securities  The fair value of investment securities are determined by an independent third party (“preparer”). The preparer’s evaluations are based on market data. They utilize evaluated pricing models that vary by asset and incorporate available trade, bid and other market information. For securities that do not trade on a daily basis, their evaluated pricing applications apply available information such as benchmarking and matrix pricing. The market inputs normally sought in the evaluation of securities include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes (only obtained from market makers or broker/dealers recognized as market participants), issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bid, offers and reference data. For certain securities additional inputs may be used or some market inputs may not be applicable. Inputs are prioritized differently on any given day based on market conditions.

U.S. Government agencies are evaluated and priced using multi‑dimensional relational models and option adjusted spreads. State and municipal securities are evaluated on a series of matrices including reported trades and material event notices. Mortgage backed securities are evaluated using matrix correlation to treasury or floating index benchmarks, prepayment speeds, monthly payment information and other benchmarks. Other investments are evaluated using a broker‑ quote based application, including quotes from issuers. The carrying amount of non-readily marketable equity securities approximates liquidation value.

Restricted Stock  The carrying amount of restricted investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock, Federal Reserve stock and ACBB stock approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.



Loans Held-for-Sale (Carried at Lower of Cost or Fair Value) The fair value of loans held-for-sale is determined, when possible, using quoted secondary-market prices. If no such quotes prices exist, the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar loan or loans, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan.



Loans  Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, commercial mortgages, residential mortgages, consumer and non-accrual loans. The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting expected cash flows using an estimated market discount rate. Expected cash flows include both contractual

29

 


 

 

cash flows and prepayments of loan balances. Prepayments on consumer loans were determined using the median of estimates of securities dealers for mortgage-backed investment pools.



The estimated discount rate considers credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan portfolios and other factors such as liquidity premiums and incremental servicing costs to an investor. Management has made estimates of fair value discount rates that it believes to be reasonable. However, because there is no market for many of these financial instruments, management has no basis to determine whether the fair value presented would be indicative of the value negotiated in an actual sale.

The fair value for non-accrual loans not based on fair value of collateral is derived through a discounted cash flow analysis, which includes the opportunity costs of carrying a non-performing asset. An estimated discount rate was used for these non-accrual loans, based on the probability of loss and the expected time to recovery.

Deposits The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-rate money market accounts, savings accounts, and interest checking accounts approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate CDs and brokered deposits (all of which are CDs) are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits. Of the $29.8 million in brokered deposits at June 30, 2017,  $2.5 million matures in 2017, $4.0 million matures in 2018, $5.9 million matures in 2019, $7.3 million matures in 2020, $5.0 million matures in 2021, and $5.1 million matures in 2022. 

Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh advances  The fair value of the FHLBP advances is obtained from the FHLB and is calculated by discounting contractual cash flows using an estimated interest rate based on the current rates available for debt of similar remaining maturities and collateral terms.

Repurchase agreements  Fair value approximates the carrying value of such liabilities due to their short-term nature.

Junior subordinated debentures  The fair value for subordinated debentures is calculated using discounted cash flows based upon current market spreads to LIBOR for debt of similar remaining maturities and collateral terms.

Subordinated debt  The fair value of the subordinated debt was estimated using either a discounted cash flow analysis based on current market interest rates for debt with similar maturities and credit quality or estimated using market quotes.    

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable   The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.



Off-balance-sheet Instruments (Disclosed at Cost)  Off-balance-sheet instruments are primarily comprised of loan commitments, which are generally priced at market at the time of funding. Fees on commitments to extend credit and stand-by letters of credit are deemed to be immaterial and these instruments are expected to be settled at face value or expire unused. It is impractical to assign any fair value to these instruments. At June 30, 2017, un-funded loan commitments totaled $178.3 million and stand-by letters of credit totaled $3.2 million. At December 31, 2016, un-funded loan commitments totaled $185.8 million and stand-by letters of credit totaled $2.8 million.







30

 


 

 

ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS



DNB Financial Corporation (the “Corporation” or "DNB"), may from time to time make written or oral “forward-looking statements,” including statements contained in the Corporation’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the exhibits hereto and thereto), in its reports to stockholders and in other communications by the Corporation, which are made in good faith by the Corporation pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



These forward-looking statements include statements with respect to the Corporation’s beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions, that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, and are subject to change based on various factors (some of which are beyond the Corporation’s control).  The words “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,”"will," “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.  The following factors, among others, could cause the Corporation’s financial performance to differ materially from the plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in such forward-looking statements: the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which the Corporation conducts operations; the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; the downgrade, and any future downgrades, in the credit rating of the U.S. Government and federal agencies; inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; the timely development of and acceptance of new products and services of the Corporation and the perceived overall value of these products and services by users, including the features, pricing and quality compared to competitors’ products and services; the willingness of users to substitute competitors’ products and services for the Corporation’s products and services; the success of the Corporation in gaining regulatory approval of its products and services, when required; the impact of changes in laws and regulations applicable to financial institutions (including laws concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance); technological changes; acquisitions; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; the nature, extent, and timing of governmental actions and reforms the implementation of Basel III, which may be changed unilaterally and retroactively by legislative or regulatory actions; and the success of the Corporation at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.

 

The Corporation cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive.  Readers are also cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date of this report, even if subsequently made available by the Corporation on its website or otherwise.  The Corporation does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Corporation to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report.



For a complete discussion of the assumptions, risks and uncertainties related to our business, you are encouraged to review our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including this Form 10-Q, as well as any changes in risk factors or other risks that we may identify in our quarterly or other reports subsequently filed with the SEC.



DESCRIPTION OF DNB'S BUSINESS AND BUSINESS STRATEGY



DNB Financial Corporation (the “Registrant” or “DNB”), a Pennsylvania business corporation, is a bank holding company registered with and supervised by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board). The Registrant was incorporated on October 28, 1982 and commenced operations on July 1, 1983 upon consummation of the acquisition of all of the outstanding stock of Downingtown National Bank, now known as DNB First, National Association (the “Bank”). Since commencing operations, DNB’s business has consisted primarily of managing and supervising the Bank, and its principal source of income has been derived from the Bank.

The Bank was organized in 1860. The Bank is a national banking association that is a member of the Federal Reserve System, the deposits of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Bank is a full service commercial bank providing a wide range of services to individuals and small to medium sized businesses in the southeastern Pennsylvania market area, including accepting time, demand, and savings deposits and making secured and unsecured commercial, real estate and consumer loans. In addition, the Bank has fifteen (15) full service branches and a full-service wealth management group known as “DNB First Wealth Management”. The Bank’s financial subsidiary, DNB Financial Services, Inc., (also known as “DNB Investments & Insurance”) is a Pennsylvania licensed insurance agency, which, through a third party marketing agreement with Cetera Investment Services, LLC, sells a broad variety of insurance and investment products. The Bank’s other subsidiaries are Downco, Inc. and DN Acquisition Company, Inc. which were incorporated in December 1995 and December 2008, respectively, for the purpose of acquiring and holding Other Real Estate Owned acquired through foreclosure or deed in-lieu-of foreclosure, as well as Bank-occupied real estate.

On April 4, 2016, DNB Financial Corporation (the “Company” or “DNBF”), the parent company of DNB First, N.A. (“DNB First”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with East River Bank (“ERB”).  Under the transaction, ERB merged with and into DNB First.  The merger was consummated on October 1, 2016. The acquisition was an opportunity for DNB

31

 


 

 

to strengthen its competitive position as one of the premier community banks headquartered in Southeastern Pennsylvania. Additionally, the ERB acquisition enhanced DNB's footprint in Southeastern Pennsylvania.

In addition to interest earned on loans and investments, DNB earns revenues from fees it charges customers for non-lending services. These products and services include trust administration, estate settlement, investment management, annuities, insurance and brokerage; cash management services; banking and ATM services; as well as safekeeping and other depository services.

To ensure we remain well positioned to meet the growing needs of our customers and communities and to meet the challenges of the 21st century, we’ve worked to build awareness of our full-service capabilities and ability to meet the needs of a wide range of customers. This served to not only retain our existing, customer base, but to position ourselves as an attractive financial institution on which younger individuals and families can build their dreams.  To that end, DNB continues to make appropriate investments in all areas of our business, including people, technology, facilities and marketing.

Comprehensive 5-Year Plan. During the fourth quarter of 2016, management updated the 5-year strategic plan that was designed to reposition its balance sheet and improve core earnings. Through the plan, management will endeavor to expand its loan portfolio through new originations, increased loan participations, as well as strategic loan and lease purchases. Management also plans to reduce the absolute level of borrowings and brokered deposits with cash flows from existing loans and investments as well as from new core deposit growth. A discussion on DNB’s Key Strategies follows:

·

Focus on penetrating existing markets to maximize profitability;

·

Grow loans and diversify the mix;

·

Improve asset quality;

·

Focus on profitable customer segments;

·

Grow and diversify non-interest income, primarily wealth management, origination and sales of SBA guaranteed loans and mortgage banking;

·

Continue to grow core deposits to maintain low funding costs;

·

Focus on cost containment and improving operational efficiencies; and

·

Continue to engage employees to help them become more effective and successful.

Strategic Plan Update.  Net income was $2.3 million or $0.53 per diluted share, for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, compared with $1.1 million, or $0.39 per diluted share for the same quarter last year. The net interest margin for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 was 3.59%, compared to 3.08% for the same period in 2016. This increase is primarily due to the acquisition of East River Bank, and includes purchase accounting fair value accretion. The composite cost of funds for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 was 0.56%, compared to 0.41% for the same period in 2016. The increase in the composite cost of funds was due largely to the acquisition of East River Bank in the fourth quarter of 2016, coupled with a 75 basis points increase in the federal funds rate, which has impacted the rates DNB pays on the majority of non-maturity deposit accounts. The allowance for credit losses at June 30, 2017 was $5.3 million compared to $5.4 million at December 31, 2016. The allowance as a percentage of total loans and leases was 0.65% at June 30, 2017, compared to 0.66% at December 31, 2016. The level of non-performing loans to total loans decreased to 0.84% as of June 30, 2017, as compared to 1.04% at December 31, 2016.

DNB’s most significant revenue source continues to be net interest income, defined as total interest income less total interest expense, which accounted for approximately 88% of total revenue during the second quarter of 2017. To produce net interest income and consistent earnings growth over the long-term, DNB must generate loan and deposit growth at acceptable economic spreads within its market area. To generate and grow loans and deposits, DNB must focus on a number of areas including, but not limited to, the economy, branch expansion, sales practices, customer satisfaction and retention, competition, customer behavior, technology, product innovation and credit performance of its customers.



Management has made a concerted effort to improve the measurement and tracking of business lines and overall corporate performance levels. Improved information systems have increased DNB’s ability to track key indicators and enhance corporate performance levels. Better measurement against goals and objectives and increased accountability will be integral in attaining desired loan, deposit and fee income production.

 

MATERIAL CHALLENGES, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES



The following is a summary of material challenges, risks and opportunities DNB has faced during the six month period ended June 30, 2017:  



Interest Rate Risk Management. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in net interest income due to changes in interest rates. DNB considers interest rate risk the predominant risk in terms of its potential impact on earnings.  Interest rate risk can occur for any one or more of the following reasons: (a) assets and liabilities may mature or re-price at different times; (b) short-term or long-term market rates may change by different amounts; or (c) the remaining maturity of various assets or liabilities may shorten or lengthen as interest rates change. 

32

 


 

 



The principal objective of the Bank’s interest rate risk management is to evaluate the interest rate risk included in certain on and off-balance sheet accounts, determine the level of risk appropriate given the Bank’s business strategy, operating environment, capital and liquidity requirements and performance objectives, and manage the risk consistent with management’s approved guidelines. Through such management, DNB seeks to reduce the vulnerability of its operations to changes in interest rates. The Bank’s Asset Liability Committee (the “ALCO”) is responsible for reviewing the Bank’s asset/liability policies and interest rate risk position and making decisions involving asset liability considerations. The ALCO meets on a monthly basis and reports trends and the Bank’s interest rate risk position to the Board of Directors.  The extent of the movement of interest rates is an uncertainty that could have a negative impact on the earnings of the Bank.



The largest component of DNB’s total income is net interest income, and the majority of DNB’s financial instruments are comprised of interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities with various terms and maturities.  The primary objective of management is to maximize net interest income while minimizing interest rate risk.  Interest rate risk is derived from timing differences in the re-pricing of assets and liabilities, loan prepayments, deposit withdrawals, and differences in lending and funding rates.  The ALCO actively seeks to monitor and control the mix of interest rate-sensitive assets and interest rate-sensitive liabilities. One measure of interest rate risk is net interest income simulation analysis.  The ALCO utilizes simulation analysis, whereby the model estimates the variance in net interest income with a change in interest rates of plus or minus 200, 300, and 400 basis points in addition to four yield curve twists over a twenty-four-month period.



Liquidity and Market Risk Management Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations. The Bank further defines liquidity as the ability to respond to deposit outflows as well as maintain flexibility to take advantage of lending and investment opportunities. The Bank’s primary sources of funds are operating earnings, deposits, repurchase agreements, principal and interest payments on loans, proceeds from loan sales, principal and interest payments on mortgage backed securities, sales of investment securities, and advances from the FHLB. The Bank uses the funds generated to support its lending and investment activities as well as any other demands for liquidity such as deposit outflows. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows, mortgage prepayments, loan and security sales and the exercise of call features are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.



The objective of DNB’s asset/liability management function is to maintain consistent growth in net interest income within DNB’s policy limits. This objective is accomplished through the management of liquidity and interest rate risk, as well as customer offerings of various loan and deposit products. DNB maintains adequate liquidity to meet daily funding requirements, anticipated deposit withdrawals, or asset opportunities in a timely manner. Liquidity is also necessary to meet obligations during unusual, extraordinary or adverse operating circumstances, while avoiding a significant loss or cost. DNB’s foundation for liquidity is a stable deposit base as well as a marketable investment portfolio that provides cash flow through regular maturities or that can be used for collateral to secure funding in an emergency. As part of its liquidity management, DNB maintains assets, which comprise its primary liquidity (Federal funds sold, investments and cash and due from banks, less the amount of securities required to be pledged for certain liabilities).



Credit Risk Management. DNB defines credit risk as the risk of default by a customer or counter-party.  The objective of DNB’s credit risk management strategy is to quantify and manage credit risk on an aggregate portfolio basis as well as to limit the risk of loss resulting from an individual customer default.  Credit risk is managed through a combination of underwriting, documentation and collection standards.  DNB’s credit risk management strategy calls for regular credit examinations and quarterly management reviews of large credit exposures and credits that are experiencing credit quality deterioration.  DNB’s loan review procedures provide assessments of the quality of underwriting, documentation, risk grading and charge-off procedures, as well as an assessment of the allowance for credit loss reserve analysis process.



Competition. In addition to the challenges related to the interest rate environment, community banks in Chester, Philadelphia and Delaware Counties have been experiencing increased competition from large regional and international banks entering DNB’s marketplace through mergers and acquisitions. Competition for loans and deposits has negatively affected DNB’s net interest margin. To compensate for the increased competition, DNB, along with other area community banks, has aggressively sought and marketed customers who have been disenfranchised by these mergers.

To attract these customers, DNB offers deposit products and services, such as Choice Checking relationship products with ATM surcharge rebates, and Online Banking with bill payment, external transfer and account aggregation functionality. DNB also offers a complete package of cash management services including automated clearing house services, remote deposit, payroll services, and merchant services and account payment solutions. Our broad range of Business Checking products provides solutions to meet the needs of a variety of businesses and non-profit organizations.

FDIC Insurance and Assessments. The Bank’s deposits are insured to applicable limits by the FDIC. Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the maximum deposit insurance amount was permanently increased from $100,000 to $250,000.



The FDIC has adopted a risk-based premium system that provides for quarterly assessments based on an insured institution’s ranking in one of four risk categories based on their examination ratings and capital ratios. Within its risk category, an institution is

33

 


 

 

assigned an initial base assessment which is then adjusted to determine its final assessment rate based on its level of brokered deposits, secured liabilities and unsecured debt.



The Dodd-Frank Act required the FDIC to take such steps as necessary to increase the reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund from 1.15% to 1.35% of insured deposits by 2020. In setting the assessments, the FDIC is required to offset the effect of the higher reserve ratio against insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion. The Dodd-Frank Act also broadened the base for FDIC insurance assessments so that assessments will be based on the average consolidated total assets less average tangible equity capital of a financial institution rather than on its insured deposits. The FDIC has adopted a restoration plan to increase the reserve ratio to 1.15% by September 30, 2020 with additional rulemaking scheduled regarding the method to be used to achieve a 1.35% reserve ratio by that date and offset the effect on institutions with less than $10 billion in assets.



Pursuant to these requirements, the FDIC adopted new assessment regulations effective April 1, 2011 that redefined the assessment base as average consolidated assets less average tangible equity. Insured banks with more than $1.0 billion in assets must calculate quarterly average assets based on daily balances while smaller banks and newly chartered banks may use weekly averages. Average assets would be reduced by goodwill and other intangibles. Average tangible equity equals Tier 1 capital. For institutions with more than $1.0 billion in assets, average tangible equity is calculated on a weekly basis while smaller institutions may use the quarter-end balance. The base assessment rate for insured institutions in Risk Category I will range between 5 to 9 basis points and for institutions in Risk Categories II, III, and IV will be 14, 23 and 35 basis points. An institution’s assessment rate will be reduced based on the amount of its outstanding unsecured long-term debt and for institutions in Risk Categories II, III and IV may be increased based on their brokered deposits.



In addition to deposit insurance assessments, banks are subject to assessments to pay the interest on Financing Corporation bonds. The Financing Corporation was created by Congress to issue bonds to finance the resolution of failed thrift institutions. The FDIC sets the Financing Corporation assessment rate every quarter. The current annual Financing Corporation assessment rate is 54 basis points on the deposit insurance assessment base, as defined above, which we anticipate will result in an aggregate estimated FICO assessment payment by the Bank of $53,000 in 2017.



Material Trends and Uncertainties.



DNB reported net income available to common stockholders of $2.3 million, or $0.53 per diluted share, for the quarter ending June 30, 2017, compared with $1.1 million, or $0.39 per diluted share, for the same quarter, last year.



There are many aspects of the economy and the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy that hinder DNB’s ability to grow revenues and net income. One of the most significant factors is that the global and U.S. economies have experienced reduced business activity as a result of disruptions in the financial system during the past nine years. The United States, Europe, China and many other countries across the globe are struggling with too much debt and weaker streams of revenues as a result of recessionary pressures, falling oil prices and high unemployment. Overall economic growth continues to be slow at a time when national and regional unemployment rates have improved, however labor participation rates remain at historically low levels. The risks associated with our business remain acute in periods of slow economic growth. While we are continuing to take steps to decrease and limit our exposure to problem loans, we nonetheless retain direct exposure to the residential and commercial real estate markets, and we are affected by these events.



Aggregate business activity in the Third District grew slightly over the July 12, 2017 Beige Book reporting period--a retreat from modest growth that had occurred during the May 31, 2017 reporting period. Manufacturing continued at a moderate pace of growth, while nonfinancial services, new home sales, and tourism continued to grow modestly. However, auto sales and construction activity exhibited essentially no growth, if not a slight decline, and non-auto retail sales declined modestly. On balance, employment and wages continued to grow at a modest pace, while prices edged only slightly higher. Overall, firms appear to have lowered their expectations to modest growth over the next six months.



Homebuilders generally reported a slight decline in activity, following moderate growth in the May 31, 2017 reporting period. Brokers in most major Third District housing markets continued to report modest growth of existing home sales, but no increase of inventories. In the Greater Philadelphia area, pending sales of houses that were under contract, dropped slightly. Overall, existing home prices continued to edge up with some variance across markets and price categories.



The Federal Reserve’s nonresidential real estate contacts reported essentially no change in construction activity, which had grown modestly during the May 31, 2017 reporting period, although individual markets do vary by sector and geography. Leasing activity continued to exhibit little change overall. Rents were rising nearly everywhere for industrial/warehouse space and the Federal Reserve’s contacts noted strong demand and stated that new buildings continue to lease up before completion.



Third District financial firms reported slight growth of overall loan volumes, excluding credit cards, which was a bit slower than the modest growth that had occurred during the May 31, 2017 Beige Book period. Commercial real estate loans and auto loans exhibited strong growth in loan volume; in contrast, mortgages and home equity loan volumes were essentially flat, while commercial and industrial loan volumes declined. Credit card volumes are highly seasonal but have grown over the year at a modest rate and grew during the July 12, 2017 Beige Book period at a robust pace similar to the change observed over the same period last year. The Federal

34

 


 

 

Reserve’s banking contacts tended to describe the economy as stable and their loan portfolios as healthy with low delinquencies and few areas of concern.



Third District manufacturers reported moderate growth in general activity; however, the pace eased off once more. During the May 31, 2017 period, the pace of new orders lessened; during the July 12, 2017 period, the pace of shipments slowed. Still, the pace of activity appears somewhat stronger than what is typical of expansionary periods in the Third District. The makers of paper products, chemicals, fabricated metal products, and industrial machinery continued to note gains in activity; these were joined by gains reported by the makers of electronic products. Firms reporting to the Federal Reserve in the primary metal sector noted reductions of new orders and shipments. Generally, the Federal Reserve’s manufacturing contacts continued to expect growth over the next six months; however, the percentage of firms expecting future increases edged down slightly for employment, capital expenditures, and general activity.



Although DNB’s earnings have been impacted by the general economic conditions, the impact has not been as severe as it has been in many parts of the nation, largely due to a relatively healthier economic climate in the Third Federal Reserve District. DNB’s franchise spans Chester, Philadelphia and Delaware counties in southeastern Pennsylvania and the majority of the loan and deposits relationships are with businesses and individuals within the Third Federal Reserve District.



These and other factors have impacted our operations. We continue to focus on the consistency and stability of core earnings and balance sheet strength which are critical success factors in today’s challenging economic environment.



Regulatory Initiatives Related to Our Industry.  The federal government continues to consider a variety of reforms related to banking and the financial industry including, without limitation, the Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank Act is intended to promote financial stability in the U.S., reduce the risk of bailouts and protect against abusive financial services practices by improving accountability and transparency in the financial system and ending “too big to fail” institutions. It is the broadest overhaul of the U.S. financial system since the Great Depression, and although enacted more than five years ago, much of its impact will be determined by the scope and substance of many regulations that still need to be adopted by various regulatory agencies to implement its provisions.  For these reasons, the overall impact on DNB and its subsidiaries remains unknown at this time. 



The Dodd-Frank Act delegates to various federal agencies, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the task of implementing its many provisions through regulation. While some regulations have been adopted, hundreds of new federal regulations, studies and reports addressing all of the major areas of the new law, including the regulation of banks and their holding companies, will be required, ensuring that federal rules and policies in this area will be further developing for months and years to come. Based on the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and adopted and anticipated implementing regulations, it is highly likely that banks and thrifts as well as their holding companies will be subject to significantly increased regulation and compliance obligations.



The Dodd-Frank Act could require us to make material expenditures, in particular personnel training costs and additional compliance expenses, or otherwise adversely affect our business or financial results.  It could also require us to change certain of our business practices, adversely affect our ability to pursue business opportunities we might otherwise consider engaging in, cause business disruptions and/or have other impacts that are as-of-yet unknown to DNB and the Bank.  Failure to comply with these laws or regulations, even if inadvertent, could result in negative publicity, fines or additional licensing expenses, any of which could have an adverse effect on our cash flow and results of operations.  For example, a provision of the Dodd-Frank Act precludes bank holding companies from treating future trust preferred securities issuances as Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital adequacy purposes.  This provision may narrow the number of possible capital raising opportunities DNB and other bank holding companies might have in the future.  Further, the new rules issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau may materially affect the methods and costs of compliance by the Bank in connection with future consumer-related transactions.



Capital Rules. On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve approved final rules that substantially amend the regulatory risk-based capital rules applicable to the Corporation and the Bank. The FDIC and the OCC have subsequently approved these rules. The final rules were adopted following the issuance of proposed rules by the Federal Reserve in June 2012, and implement the “Basel III” regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. “Basel III” refers to two consultative documents released by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2009, the rules text released in December 2010, and loss absorbency rules issued in January 2011, which include significant changes to bank capital, leverage and liquidity requirements.



The rules include new risk-based capital and leverage ratios, which will be phased in from 2015 to 2019, and refine the definition of what constitutes “capital” for purposes of calculating those ratios. The new minimum capital level requirements applicable to the Corporation and the Bank under the final rules effective as of January 1, 2015: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6% (increased from 4%); (iii) a total capital ratio of 8% (unchanged from current rules); and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% for all institutions. The final rules also establish a “capital conservation buffer” above the new regulatory minimum capital requirements, which must consist entirely of common equity Tier 1 capital. The capital conservation buffer will be phased-in over four years beginning on January 1, 2016, as follows: the maximum buffer was 0.625% of risk-weighted assets for 2016, 1.25% for 2017, 1.875% for 2018, and 2.5% for 2019 and thereafter. This will result in the following minimum ratios beginning in 2019: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%, (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%, and (iii) a total capital ratio of 10.5%. Under the final rules, institutions are subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses if its

35

 


 

 

capital level falls below the buffer amount. These limitations establish a maximum percentage of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions.



The final rules implemented revisions and clarifications consistent with Basel III regarding the various components of Tier 1 capital, including common equity, unrealized gains and losses, as well as certain instruments that no longer qualify as Tier 1 capital, some of which will be phased out over time. However, the final rules provided that small depository institution holding companies with less than $15 billion in total assets as of December 31, 2009 (which includes the Corporation) were able to permanently include non-qualifying instruments that were issued and included in Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital prior to May 19, 2010 in additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital until they redeem such instruments or until the instruments mature.



The final rules also contained revisions to the prompt corrective action framework, which is designed to place restrictions on insured depository institutions, including the Bank, if their capital levels begin to show signs of weakness. These revisions took effect January 1, 2015. Under the prompt corrective action requirements, which are designed to complement the capital conservation buffer, insured depository institutions are required to meet the following increased capital level requirements in order to qualify as “well capitalized:” (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8% (increased from 6%); (iii) a total capital ratio of 10% (unchanged from current rules); and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5% (increased from 4%).



The final rules set forth certain changes for the calculation of risk-weighted assets, which have been required to be utilized since January 1, 2015. The standardized approach final rule utilizes an increased number of credit risk exposure categories and risk weights, and also addresses: (i) an alternative standard of creditworthiness consistent with Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act; (ii) revisions to recognition of credit risk mitigation; (iii) rules for risk weighting of equity exposures and past due loans; (iv) revised capital treatment for derivatives and repo-style transactions; and (v) disclosure requirements for top-tier banking organizations with $50 billion or more in total assets that are not subject to the “advance approach rules” that apply to banks with greater than $250 billion in consolidated assets. Based on our current capital composition and levels, we believe that we are in compliance with the requirements as set forth in the final rules presently in effect.



Other Material Challenges, Risks and Opportunities. As a financial institution, DNB's earnings are significantly affected by general business and economic conditions.  These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, monetary supply, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets, and the strength of the United States economy and local economies in which we operate.  As mentioned above in Material Trends and Uncertainties, the economic downturn, increased unemployment, and other events negatively impact household and/or corporate incomes and could decrease the demand for DNB's loan and non-loan products and services and increase the number of customers who fail to pay interest or principal on their loans.  Geopolitical conditions can also affect DNB's earnings.  Acts or threats of terrorism, actions taken by the United States or other governments in response to acts or threats of terrorism and our military conflicts, could impact business conditions in the United States.



CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES



The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principals. Generally accepted accounting principles are complex and require management to apply significant judgment to various accounting, reporting and disclosure matters. Management must use assumptions and estimates to apply these principles where actual measurement is not possible or practical. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.



In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Amounts subject to significant estimates are items such as the allowance for credit losses and lending related commitments, the fair value of repossessed assets, pension and post-retirement obligations, the fair value of financial instruments, other-than-temporary impairments of investment securities, the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, and the valuations of goodwill for impairment. Among other effects, such changes could result in future impairments of investment securities, and establishment of allowances for credit losses and lending related commitments as well as increased benefit plans’ expenses.  The comparability of the results of operations for the periods ended June 30, 2017 compared to June 30, 2016, in general, have been impacted by the acquisition of ERB on October 1, 2016.  The assets and liabilities of ERB were recorded on the consolidated satement of financial condition at their established fair value as of October 1, 2016, and their results of operations have been included in the consolidated income statement since that date



The notes to DNB's most recent Consolidated Financial Statements as set forth in DNB's Annual Report 10-K identify other significant accounting policies used in the development and presentation of its financial statements. This discussion and analysis, the significant accounting policies, and other financial statement disclosures identify and address key variables and other qualitative and quantitative factors that are necessary for an understanding and evaluation of DNB and its results of operations.



36

 


 

 

FINANCIAL CONDITION



DNB's total assets were $1.08 billion at June 30, 2017, compared to $1.07 billion at December 31, 2016.  The $10.8 million increase in total assets was primarily attributable to a $14.1 million increase in cash and cash equivalents, a $2.6 million increase in other real estate owned and other repossessed property, offset by a $5.1 million decrease in investment securities and a $898,000 decrease in net loans.  



Investment Securities. Investment securities, including restricted stock, at June 30, 2017 were $183.7 million, compared to $187.6 million at December 31, 2016. The $3.9 million decrease in investment securities and restricted stock was primarily due to $18.6 million in sales, principal pay-downs, calls and maturities, offset by $13.5 million in purchases of investment securities and $1.2 million increase in restricted stock.  



Gross Loans. DNB’s loans decreased  $1.0 million to $816.5 million at June 30, 2017, compared to $817.5 million at December 31, 2016. Total commercial loans increased  $2.7 million, while consumer loans decreased  $2.7 million and residential loans decreased $949,000.



Deposits. Deposits were $893.1 million at June 30, 2017, compared to $885.2 million at December 31, 2016.  Deposits increased $7.9 million or 0.89% during the six month period ended June 30, 2017. Core deposits, which are comprised of demand, NOW, money markets and savings accounts, increased by $47.5 million, while time deposits decreased by $40.1 million and brokered deposits increased by $525,000



Borrowings. Borrowings were $85.0 million at June 30, 2017, compared to $86.7 million at December 31, 2016.  The decrease of $1.7 million or 1.9% was primarily due to a $5.5 million decrease in FHLBP advances offset by a $3.8 million increase in repurchase agreements.



Stockholders’ Equity. Stockholders' equity was $99.4 million at June 30, 2017, compared to $94.8 million at December 31, 2016. The increase in stockholders’ equity was primarily a result of year-to-date earnings of $4.7 million,  sales of treasury shares totaling $253,000, restricted stock compensation expense of $214,000, and $154,000 of other comprehensive income. These additions to stockholders’ equity were partially offset by taxes on exercise of stock options of $187,000 and $596,000 of dividends paid on DNB’s common stock.



RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

SUMMARY  



Net income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 was $2.3 million and $4.7 million compared to $1.1 million and $2.7 million for the same periods in 2016.  The comparability of the results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016, in general, have been impacted by the acquisition of ERB on October 1, 2016.  Diluted earnings per share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 were $0.53 and $1.10 compared to $0.39 and $0.93 for the same periods in 2016. The $1.2 million increase in net income in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the second quarter of 2016 was primarily attributable to a $3.4 million increase in net interest income after provision (primarily due to interest and fees on loans) and a $35,000 increase in non-interest income, offset by a $368,000 increase in income tax expense and a $1.9 million increase in non-interest expense (primarily due to salary and employee benefits). The $2.1 million increase in net income during the six month period ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2016 was primarily attributable to a $7.2 million increase in net interest income after provision (primarily due to interest and fees on loans), offset by a $915,000 increase in income tax expense, a $988,000 decrease in non-interest income (primarily due to significantly higher gains on insurance proceeds in 2016), and a $3.2 million increase in non-interest expense (primarily due to salary and employee benefits).



NET INTEREST INCOME



DNB's earnings performance is primarily dependent upon its level of net interest income, which is the excess of interest income over interest expense.  Interest income includes interest earned on loans, investments and federal funds sold and interest-earning cash, as well as loan fees and dividend income earned on investment securities.  Interest expense includes interest on deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh ("FHLBP") advances, repurchase agreements, Federal funds purchased, subordinated debentures and notes, and other borrowings.



Net interest income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 was $9.3 million and $18.5 million, compared to $5.5 million and $10.9 million for the same periods in 2016. Interest income for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2017 was $10.7 million and $21.2 million, compared to $6.2 million and $12.3 million for the same periods in 2016.  The $4.5 million increase in interest income in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the second quarter of 2016 was primarily due to a 67.3%  increase in total average loans and a 0.51% increase in the net interest margin to 3.59% for the three month period ended June 30, 2017, compared to 3.08% for the same period in 2016. The $8.9 million increase in the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared the same period in 2016 was primarily due to a 68.0% increase in total average loans and a 0.51% increase in the net interest margin to 3.63% for the six month period ended June 30, 2017, compared to 3.12% for the same period in 2016. The main driver for the increase in both volume and rate

37

 


 

 

was the East River Bank (“ERB”) acquisition, which took place October 1, 2016. For the three and six month period ended June 30, 2017, the weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets was 4.12% and 4.14%, which included purchase accounting adjustments of $443,000 and $1.1 million, respectively.  Interest expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 was $1.4 million and $2.6 million, compared to $708,000 and $1.4 million for the same periods in 2016. The composite cost of funds for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2017 was 0.56% and 0.54%, compared to 0.40%  and 0.41% for the same periods in 2016.  



Interest on loans was $9.6 million and $19.1 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017, compared to $5.1 million and $10.2 million for the same periods in 2016. The average balance of loans was $817.1 million with an average yield of 4.68% for the second quarter of 2017, compared to $488.4 million with an average yield of 4.21% for the same period in 2016.  The average balance of loans was $816.1 million with an average yield of 4.69% for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $485.8 million with an average yield of 4.22% for the same period in 2016. The increases in average balance and average yield were attributable to the acquisition of ERB effective October 1, 2016.



Interest and dividends on investment securities was $993,000 and $1.9 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017, compared to $1.0 million and $2.1 million for the same periods in 2016. The average balance of investment securities was $183.4 million with a tax equivalent average yield of 2.42% for the second quarter of 2017, compared to $207.9 million with a tax equivalent average yield of 2.18% for the same period in 2016.  The average balance of investment securities was $185.3 million with a tax equivalent average yield of 2.36% for the six month period ended June 30, 2017, compared to $209.2 million with a tax equivalent average yield of 2.20% for the same period in 2016.



Interest on deposits was $995,000 and $1.9 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017, compared to $405,000 and $748,000 for the same periods in 2016. The average balance of deposits was $903.5 million with an average rate of 0.44% for the second quarter of 2017, compared to $637.8 million with an average rate of 0.25% for the same period in 2016.  The average balance of deposits was $893.5 million with an average rate of 0.42% for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $626.5 million with an average rate of 0.24% for the same period in 2016. The increases in average balance and average rate were attributable to the acquisition of ERB on October 1, 2016, coupled with a 75 basis points increase in the federal funds rate, which has impacted the rates DNB pays on the majority of non-maturity deposit accounts.



Interest on borrowings was $387,000 and $772,000 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017, compared to $303,000 and $610,000 for the same periods in 2016. The average balance of borrowings was $82.6 million with an average rate of 1.87% for the second quarter of 2017, compared to $58.6 million with an average rate of 2.07% for the same period in 2016.  The average balance of borrowings was $85.2 million with an average rate of 1.82% for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $62.6 million with an average rate of 1.95% for the same period in 2016.



PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES



To provide for known and inherent losses in the loan portfolios, DNB maintains an allowance for credit losses. Provisions for credit losses are charged against income to increase the allowance when necessary. Loan losses are charged directly against the allowance and recoveries on previously charged-off loans are added to the allowance. In establishing its allowance for credit losses, management considers the size and risk exposure of each segment of the loan portfolio, past loss experience, present indicators of risk such as delinquency rates, levels of non-accruals, the potential for losses in future periods, and other relevant factors. Management’s evaluation of criticized and classified loans generally includes reviews of borrowers of $100,000 or greater. Consideration is also given to examinations performed by regulatory agencies, primarily the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”). Based on reviews and analyses by regulators, additional allowances may be required in the future.

Management reviews and establishes the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, guidance provided by the Securities and Exchange Commission and as prescribed in OCC Bulletin 2006-47. Its methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of several key elements which include: specific allowances for identified impaired loans; and allowances by loan type for pooled homogenous loans. In considering national and local economic trends, we review a variety of information including Federal Reserve publications, general economic statistics, foreclosure rates and housing statistics published by third parties. We believe this improves the measure of inherent loss over a complete economic cycle and reduces the impact for qualitative adjustments. The unallocated portion of the allowance is intended to provide for probable losses not otherwise accounted for in management’s other elements of its overall estimate. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties such as changes in the national and local economy, concentrations of credit, expansion into new markets and other factors that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

In addition, DNB reviews historical loss experience for the residential mortgage, commercial mortgage, commercial term, commercial construction, home equity and consumer installment loan pools to determine a historical loss factor. The historical loss factors are then applied to the current portfolio balances to determine the required reserve percentage for each loan pool. A historical loss ratio is determined for each group over a five year period. The five year average loss ratio by type is then used to calculate the estimated loss based on the current balance of each group. This five year time period is appropriate given DNB’s historical level of losses and, more importantly, represents the current economic environment.

38

 


 

 

This analysis is intended to assess the potential for loss within the loan portfolio and to substantiate the adequacy of the allowance. Should the analysis indicate that the allowance is not adequate, management will recommend a provision expense be made in an amount equal to the shortfall derived. In establishing and reviewing the allowance for adequacy, emphasis has been placed on utilizing the methodology prescribed in OCC Bulletin 2006-47. Management believes that the following factors create a comprehensive system of controls in which management can monitor the quality of the loan portfolio. Consideration has been given to the following factors and variables which may influence the risk of loss within the loan portfolio:

·

Changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and in the terms of loans;

·

Changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of non-accrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans;

·

The existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations;

·

Changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices not considered elsewhere in estimating credit losses;

·

Changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff;

·

Changes in loan review methodology and degree of oversight by DNB’s Board of Directors;

·

Changes in international, national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and developments that affect the collectability of the portfolio, including the condition of various market segments;

·

The effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in the institution’s existing portfolio; and

·

Changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral‑dependent loans.

Portfolio risk includes the levels and trends in delinquencies, impaired loans, changes in the loan rating matrix and trends in volume and terms of loans. Management is satisfied with the stability of the past due and non-performing loans and believes there has been no further decline in the quality of the loan portfolio due to any trend in delinquent or adversely classified loans. In addition to ordering new appraisals and creating specific reserves on impaired loans, the allowance allocation rates were increased, reflective of delinquency trends which have been caused by continued weakness in the housing markets, falling home equity values, and rising unemployment. New appraisal values we have obtained for existing loans have generally been consistent with trends indicated by Case-Schiller and other indices.

Given the contraction in real estate values, DNB closely monitors the loan to value ratios of all classified assets and requires periodic current appraisals to monitor underlying collateral values. Management also reviews borrower, sponsorship and guarantor’s financial strength along with their ability and willingness to provide financial support of their obligations on an immediate and continuing basis.

There was a $585,000 and $910,000 provision made during the three and six months periods ended June 30, 2017, compared to $200,000 and $530,000 for the same periods in 2016. DNB’s percentage of allowance for credit losses to total loans was 0.65%  at June 30, 2017 compared to 0.66% and 1.06% at December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, respectively. The decline in this ratio from 1.06% at June 30, 2016 to 0.65% at June 30, 2017 was primarily due to the acquisition of ERB. Loans acquired in connection with the purchase of ERB have been recorded at fair value, in accordance with GAAP, and are based on an initial estimate of the expected cash flows, including a reduction for estimated credit losses, and without carryover of the respective portfolio’s historical allowance for credit losses. DNB will continually evaluate the loans acquired from ERB for additional impairment as part of our normal allowance review process. Net charge-offs were $1.0 million, $292,000, and $218,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2017, year ended December 31, 2016, and six months ended June 30,  2016, respectively. The percentage of net charge-offs to total average loans were 0.12%, 0.05%, and 0.04% for those same respective periods. Management believes that the allowance for credit losses is adequate, but continues to monitor it along with other performance metrics including those ratios related to non-performing loans. Management is not aware of any potential problem loans, which were accruing and current at June 30, 2017, where serious doubt exists as to the ability of the borrower to comply with the present repayment terms and that would result in a significant loss to DNB. Non-performing loans decreased  $1.6 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2017.  The ratio of the allowance for credit losses as a percentage of loans reflects management’s estimate of the level of inherent losses in the portfolio, which has been impacted by a slow economy, a weakened housing market and deterioration in income-producing properties.

We typically establish a general valuation allowance on classified loans which are not individually impaired. In establishing the general valuation allowance, we segregate these loans by category. The categories used by DNB include “doubtful,” “substandard,” “special mention,” “watch list” and “pass.” For commercial mortgage, commercial and construction loans, the determination of the category for each loan is based on periodic reviews of each loan by our lending and credit officers as well as an independent, third-party consultant. The reviews include a consideration of such factors as recent payment history, current financial data, cash flow, financial projections, collateral evaluations, guarantor or sponsorship financial strength and current economic and business conditions. Categories for residential mortgage and consumer loans are determined through a similar review. Classification of a loan within a category is based on identified weaknesses that increase the credit risk of loss on the loan. Each category carries a loss factor for the allowance percentage to be assigned to the loans within that category. The allowance percentage, is determined based on inherent losses associated with each type of lending as determined through consideration of our loss history with each type of loan, trends in credit quality and collateral values, and an evaluation of current economic and business conditions.

39

 


 

 

We establish a general allowance on non-classified loans to recognize the inherent losses associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been allocated to particular problem loans. This general valuation allowance is determined by segregating the loans by loan category and assigning allowance percentages to each category. An evaluation of each category is made to determine the need to further segregate the loans within each category by type. For our residential mortgage and consumer loan portfolios, we identify similar characteristics throughout the portfolio including credit scores, loan-to-value ratios and collateral. For our commercial mortgage and construction loan portfolios, a further analysis is made in which we segregated the loans by type based on the purpose of the loan and the collateral properties securing the loan. Various risk factors for each type of loan are considered, including the impact of general economic and business conditions, collateral value trends, credit quality trends and historical loss experience.

As of June 30, 2017, DNB had $12.2 million of non-performing assets, which included $6.7 million of non-performing loans and $5.4 million of OREO and other repossessed assets. This compares to $11.3 million of non-performing assets at December 31, 2016 which included $8.5 million of non-performing loans and $2.8 million of OREO and other repossessed assets. Loans are reviewed for impairment in accordance with FASB ASC 310-10-35. Impaired loans can either be secured or unsecured, not including large groups of smaller balance loans that are collectively evaluated. Impairment is measured by the difference between the loan amount and the present value of the future cash flow discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. Management measures loans for impairment by using the fair value of collateral for collateral dependent loans. In general, management reduces the amount of the appraisal by the estimated cost of acquisition and disposition of the underlying collateral and compares that adjusted value with DNB’s carrying value. DNB establishes a specific valuation allowance on impaired loans that have a collateral shortfall and/or cashflow shortfalls, including estimated costs to sell in comparison to the carrying value of the loan. Of the $7.5 million of impaired loans ($7.4 million of non-performing loans and $147,000 of performing TDRs) at June 30, 2017, $445,000 had valuation allowances of $67,000 and $7.1 million had no specific allowance. Of the $8.6 million of impaired loans at December 31, 2016, $1.9 million had valuation allowances of $334,000 and $6.7 million had no specific allowance. For those impaired loans that management determined that no specific valuation allowance was necessary, management has reviewed the present value of the future cash flows or the appraisal for each loan and determined that no valuation was necessary. During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, DNB recognized $740,000 in total charge-offs, $720,000 of which related to impaired loans. An impaired loan may not represent an expected loss.

We typically order new third-party appraisals or collateral valuations when a loan becomes impaired or is transferred to Other Real Estate Owned ("OREO"). This is done within two weeks of a loan becoming impaired or a loan moving to OREO. It generally takes two to eight weeks to receive the appraisals, depending on the type of property being appraised. We recognize any provision or related charge-off within two weeks of receiving the appraisal after the appraisal has been reviewed by DNB. We generally order a new appraisal for all impaired real estate loans having a balance of $100,000 or higher, every twelve months, unless management determines more frequent appraisals are necessary. We use updated valuations when time constraints do not permit a full appraisal process, to reflect rapidly changing market conditions. Because appraisals and updated valuations utilize historical data in reaching valuation conclusions, the appraised or updated value may or may not reflect the actual sales price that we will receive at the time of sale. Management uses the qualitative factor “Changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans” to calculate any required reserve to mitigate this risk.

Real estate appraisals typically include up to three approaches to value: the sales comparison approach, the income approach (for income-producing property) and the cost approach. Not all appraisals utilize all three approaches to value. Depending on the nature of the collateral and market conditions, the appraiser may emphasize one approach over another in determining the fair value of collateral.

Appraisals may also contain different estimates of value based on the level of occupancy or future improvements. “As-is” valuations represent an estimate of value based on current market conditions with no changes to the collateral’s use or condition. “As-stabilized” or “as-completed” valuations assume that the collateral is improved to a stated standard or achieves its highest and best use in terms of occupancy. “As-stabilized” valuations may be subject to a present value adjustment for market conditions or the schedule for improvements.

In connection with the valuation process, we will typically develop an exit strategy for the collateral by assessing overall market conditions, the current condition and use of the asset and its highest and best use. For most income-producing real estate, investors value most highly a stable income stream from the asset; consequently, we conduct a comparative evaluation to determine whether conducting a sale on an “as-is” basis or on an “as-stabilized” basis is most likely to produce the highest net realizable value and compare these values with the costs incurred and the holding period necessary to achieve the “as stabilized” value.

Our estimates of the net realizable value of collateral include a deduction for the expected costs to sell the collateral or such other deductions as deemed appropriate. For most real estate collateral, we apply a seven to ten percent deduction to the value of real estate collateral to determine its expected costs to sell the asset.

40

 


 

 

Analysis of Allowance for Credit Losses

(Dollars in thousands)





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Six Months Ended

Year Ended

Six Months Ended



June 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

June 30, 2016

Beginning balance

$

5,373 

 

$

4,935 

 

$

4,935 

 

Provisions

 

910 

 

 

730 

 

 

530 

 

Loans charged off:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage

 

 -

 

 

(206)

 

 

(206)

 

Commercial mortgage

 

(483)

 

 

(39)

 

 

 -

 

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

(596)

 

 

(45)

 

 

(24)

 

Commercial construction

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Lease financing

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Other

 

(10)

 

 

(21)

 

 

 -

 

Total charged off

 

(1,089)

 

 

(311)

 

 

(230)

 

Recoveries:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage

 

 

 

13 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage

 

50 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

19 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial construction

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 

Lease financing

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home Equity

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total recoveries

 

73 

 

 

19 

 

 

12 

 

Ending balance

$

5,267 

 

$

5,373 

 

$

5,247 

 



The following table sets forth the composition of DNB’s allowance for credit losses for the dates indicated.

Composition of Allowance for Credit Losses

(Dollars in thousands)





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

June 30, 2017

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

June 30, 2016

 



 

 

Percent of

 

 

 

Percent of

 

 

 

Percent of

 



 

 

Loan Type

 

 

 

Loan Type

 

 

 

Loan Type

 



 

 

to Total

 

 

 

to Total

 

 

 

to Total

 



 

Amount

Loans

 

 

Amount

Loans

 

 

Amount

Loans

 

Residential mortgage

$

245  11 

%

$

349  11 

%

$

314 

%

Commercial mortgage

 

2,634  56 

 

 

2,531  57 

 

 

2,370  56 

 

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

625  14 

 

 

709  15 

 

 

891  22 

 

Commercial construction

 

1,208  11 

 

 

969 

 

 

866 

 

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

189 

 

 

196 

 

 

191  10 

 

Other

 

84 

 

 

61 

 

 

64 

 

Unallocated

 

282 

 -

 

 

558 

 -

 

 

551 

 -

 

Total

$

5,267  100 

%

$

5,373  100 

%

$

5,247  100 

%

Reserve for unfunded loan commitments

$

340 

 

 

$

345 

 

 

$

190 

 

 



41

 


 

 

NON-INTEREST INCOME



Non-interest income includes service charges on deposit products; fees received in connection with the sale of non-depository products and services, including fiduciary and investment advisory services offered through DNB First Investment Management and Trust; securities brokerage products and services and insurance products and services offered through DNB Investments & Insurance; and other sources of income such as increases in the cash surrender value of Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”), net gains on sales of investment securities, mortgage loans, SBA loans and OREO properties. In addition, DNB receives fees for cash management, mortgage banking, remote capture, merchant services, debit cards, safe deposit box rentals and similar activities.

Non-interest income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 was $1.4 million and $2.7 million, compared to $1.4 million and $3.7 million for the same periods in 2016. The $35,000 increase during the three months ended June 30, 2017 was mainly attributable to increases of $102,000 in other fees (mostly servicing fee income), $97,000 in gain on sale of loans, $51,000 in service charges on deposits (mostly NSF fees and business analysis charges), and $30,000 in wealth management. These increases were offset by decreases of $178,000 in gain on sale of investment securities and $67,000 in mortgage banking. The $988,000 decrease during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was mainly attributable to decreases of $1.1 million in gains on insurance proceeds (DNB received $1.15 million in gains on insurance proceeds in 2016 as a result of a fire at our West Chester offices that occurred during the second quarter of 2015),  $209,000 in gain on sale of investment securities, and $63,000 in mortgage banking. These decreases were offset by increases of $182,000 in other fees (mostly servicing fee income), $107,000 in service charges on deposits (mostly NSF fees and business analysis charges), $58,000 in gain on sale of loans, and $7,000 in wealth management.



NON-INTEREST EXPENSE



Non-interest expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 was $7.1 million and $13.8 million, compared to $5.2 million and $10.6 million for the same periods in 2016. During the three months ended June 30, 2017, total non-interest expense increased by $1.9 million.  Compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2016, the increase in non-interest expense was largely due to the addition of ERB staff, offices and equipment as well as Core deposit intangible amortization expense. The increase was primarily due to increases of $1.0 million in salary and employee benefits, $272,000 in other expenses (mostly OREO expense, loss on sale or write-down of OREO, officer & employee expense, Visa debit charge-off expense, amortization of core deposit intangible, and director’s fees), $189,000 in occupancy (mostly office building rental expense), $163,000 in furniture and equipment (mostly maintenance agreements and depreciation), $123,000 in professional and consulting (mostly legal and 3rd party services), $111,000 in loss on sale or write down of OREO, $108,000 in advertising and marketing, $76,000 in PA shares tax, $29,000 in FDIC insurance, $27,000 in telecommunications, $26,000 in printing and supplies, and $6,000 in postage. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $249,000 in due diligence and merger expense. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, total non-interest expense increased by $3.2 million. Compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2016, the increase in non-interest expense was largely due to the addition of ERB staff, offices and equipment as well as Core deposit intangible amortization expense. The increase was primarily due to increases of $1.5 million in salary and employee benefits, $548,000 in other expenses (mostly OREO expense, loss on sale of OREO, officer & employee expense, Visa debit charge-off expense, amortization of core deposit intangible, and director’s fees), $440,000 in occupancy (mostly office building rental expense), $330,000 in furniture and equipment (mostly maintenance agreements and depreciation), $207,000 in professional and consulting (mostly legal and 3rd party services), $139,000 in PA shares tax, $110,000 in loss on sale or write down of OREO, $95,000 in FDIC insurance, $91,000 in advertising and marketing, $56,000 in telecommunications, $43,000 in printing and supplies, and $20,000 in postage. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $386,000 in due diligence and merger expense.



INCOME TAXES



Income tax expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 was $746,000 and $1.8 million, compared to $378,000 and $858,000 for the same periods in 2016. The effective tax rate for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 was 24.6% and 27.3% compared to 25.4%  and 24.4% for the same periods in 2016.  The effective tax rate for the six month period ended June 30, 2017 increased to 27.3%, primarily due to a smaller percentage of tax exempt items in relation to of our pre-tax income during the first six months of 2017 compared to the first six months of 2016. The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2017 decreased to 24.6% primarily due to the recording of the $153,000 tax benefit for exercise of stock options relating to ASU 2016-09. Income tax expense for each period differs from the amount determined at the statutory rate of 34.0% due to tax-exempt income on loans and investment securities, DNB's ownership of BOLI policies, and tax credits recognized on a low-income housing limited partnership.



ASSET QUALITY



DNB continues to work diligently to improve asset quality by adhering to strict underwriting standards and improving lending policies and procedures. Non-performing assets totaled $12.2 million at June 30, 2017 compared to $11.3 million at December 31, 2016 and $10.5 million at June 30, 2016. The non-performing loans to total loans ratio was 0.84% at June 30, 2017, 1.04% at December 31, 2016, and 1.54% at June 30, 2016. The non-performing assets to total assets ratio was 1.13% at June 30, 2017, 1.05% at December 31, 2016, and 1.38% at June 30, 2016. The allowance to non-performing loans ratio was 76.8% at June 30, 2017,  63.2% at December 31, 2016, and 69.1% at June 30, 2016.  These ratios have declined primarily due to the acquisition of ERB. Loans acquired in connection

42

 


 

 

with the purchase of ERB have been recorded at fair value, in accordance with GAAP, and are based on an initial estimate of the expected cash flows, including a reduction for estimated credit losses, and without carryover of the respective portfolio’s historical allowance for credit losses. DNB will continually evaluate the loans acquired from ERB for additional impairment as part of our normal allowance review process. Non-performing assets have, and will continue to have, an impact on earnings; therefore management intends to continue working aggressively to reduce the level of such assets.

Non-performing assets are comprised of non-accrual loans, loans delinquent over ninety days and still accruing, as well as OREO and other repossessed assets. Non-accrual loans are loans for which the accrual of interest ceases when the collection of principal or interest payments is determined to be doubtful by management. It is the policy of DNB to discontinue the accrual of interest when principal or interest payments are delinquent 90 days or more (unless the loan principal and interest are determined by management to be fully secured and in the process of collection), or earlier if considered prudent. Interest received on such loans is applied to the principal balance, or may, in some instances, be recognized as income on a cash basis. A non-accrual loan may be restored to accrual status when management expects to collect all contractual principal and interest due and the borrower has demonstrated a sustained period of repayment performance in accordance with the contractual terms. OREO consists of real estate acquired by foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. Other repossessed assets are primarily assets from DNB’s consumer purchased chattel portfolio that were repossessed. OREO and other repossessed assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or estimated fair value, less estimated disposition costs. Any significant change in the level of non-performing assets is dependent, to a large extent, on the economic climate within DNB’s market area.

DNB’s Credit Policy Committee monitors the performance of the loan portfolio to identify potential problem assets on a timely basis. Committee members meet to design, implement and review asset recovery strategies, which serve to maximize the recovery of each troubled asset. As of June 30, 2017, DNB had $12.8 million of substandard loans. Of the $12.8 million, $5.4 million are performing and are believed to require supervision and review greater than loans rated pass or special mention; and may, depending on the economic environment and other factors, become non-performing assets in future periods. The amount of performing substandard loans at December 31, 2016 was $13.5 million. The majority of the loans are secured by commercial real estate, with lesser amounts being secured by residential real estate, inventory and receivables.

The following table sets forth those assets that are: (i) placed on non-accrual status, (ii) contractually delinquent by 90 days or more and still accruing, and (iii) OREO as a result of foreclosure or voluntary transfer to DNB as well as other repossessed assets. In addition, the table sets forth DNB's asset quality and allowance coverage ratios at the dates indicated:

Non-Performing Assets

(Dollars in thousands)







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



June 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

June 30, 2016

 

Non-accrual loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage

$

1,815 

 

$

1,770 

 

$

1,772 

 

 

Commercial mortgage

 

2,375 

 

 

4,593 

 

 

3,140 

 

 

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial term

 

1,510 

 

 

198 

 

 

207 

 

 

Commercial construction

 

447 

 

 

1,242 

 

 

1,524 

 

 

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

404 

 

 

442 

 

 

564 

 

 

Other

 

311 

 

 

256 

 

 

222 

 

 

Total non-accrual loans

 

6,862 

 

 

8,501 

 

 

7,429 

 

 

Loans 90 days past due and still accruing

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

162 

 

 

Total non-performing loans

 

6,862 

 

 

8,501 

 

 

7,591 

 

 

Other real estate owned & other repossessed property

 

5,351 

 

 

2,767 

 

 

2,952 

 

 

Total non-performing assets

$

12,213 

 

$

11,268 

 

$

10,543 

 

 

Asset quality ratios:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-performing loans to total loans

 

0.84 

%

 

1.04 

%

 

1.54 

%

 

Non-performing assets to total assets

 

1.13 

 

 

1.05 

 

 

1.38 

 

 

Allowance for credit losses to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total loans

 

0.65 

 

 

0.66 

 

 

1.06 

 

 

Non-performing loans

 

76.8 

 

 

63.2 

 

 

69.1 

 

 





43

 


 

 

Troubled Debt Restructurings Loans whose terms are modified are classified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”) if DNB grants such borrowers concessions and it is deemed that those borrowers are experiencing financial difficulty. Concessions granted under a troubled debt restructuring generally involve a temporary reduction in interest rate or an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date. Non-accrual troubled debt restructurings are restored to accrual status if principal and interest payments, under the modified terms, are current for six consecutive months after modification. Loans classified as troubled debt restructurings are designated as impaired. The recorded investments in troubled debt restructured loans at June, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



June 30, 2017



Pre-Modification

 

Post-Modification

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Outstanding Recorded Investment

 

Outstanding Recorded Investment

 

Recorded Investment

Residential mortgage

$

754 

 

 

$

883 

 

 

$

709 

 

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

148 

 

 

 

148 

 

 

 

147 

 

Other

 

40 

 

 

 

42 

 

 

 

39 

 

Total

$

942 

 

 

$

1,073 

 

 

$

895 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



December 31, 2016



Pre-Modification

 

Post-Modification

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Outstanding Recorded Investment

 

Outstanding Recorded Investment

 

Recorded Investment

Residential mortgage

$

754 

 

 

$

883 

 

 

$

726 

 

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home equity

 

148 

 

 

 

148 

 

 

 

148 

 

Other

 

40 

 

 

 

42 

 

 

 

40 

 

Total

$

942 

 

 

$

1,073 

 

 

$

914 

 



At June 30, 2017, DNB had five TDRs with recorded investment totaling $895,000, one of which totaled $102,000, represented an accruing impaired home equity loan in compliance with the terms of the modification. The remaining $793,000 represents four loans that were nonaccrual impaired loans and resulted in collateral evaluations. As a result of the evaluations, specific reserves and charge-offs have been taken where appropriate. DNB recognized partial charge-offs totaling $151,000 on two residential loans prior to their restructuring and $2,000 to one consumer installment loan after its restructuring. DNB did not recognize any charge-off on the last remaining TDR. As of June 30, 2017, none of the TDRs are in default and are current with respect to their associated forbearance agreements. There were no defaults on TDRs during the three months ended June 30, 2017. 



At December 31, 2016, DNB had five TDRs with recorded investment totaling $914,000, one of which totaled $102,000, represented an accruing impaired home equity loan in compliance with the terms of the modification. The remaining $812,000 represents four loans that were nonaccrual impaired loans and resulted in collateral evaluations. As a result of the evaluations, specific reserves and charge-offs have been taken where appropriate. As of December 31, 2016, DNB recognized partial charge-offs totaling $151,000 on two residential loans prior to their restructuring and $2,000 to one consumer installment loan after its restructuring. DNB did not recognize any charge-off on the last remaining TDR. As of December 31, 2016, there were no defaulted TDRs as all TDRs were current with respect to their associated forbearance agreements. There were no defaults on TDRs within twelve months of restructure during the six months ended June 30, 2016.



Impaired loans are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans.  Information regarding impaired loans is presented as follows:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



At and For the

At and For the

At and For the



Six Months Ended

Year Ended

Six Months Ended

(Dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

June 30, 2016

Total recorded investment

$

7,528 

 

$

8,604 

 

$

7,531 

 

Impaired loans with a specific allowance

 

445 

 

 

1,872 

 

 

1,578 

 

Impaired loans without a specific allowance

 

7,083 

 

 

6,732 

 

 

5,953 

 

Average recorded investment

 

7,987 

 

 

6,669 

 

 

5,895 

 

Specific allowance allocation

 

67 

 

 

334 

 

 

297 

 

Total principal and interest collected

 

331 

 

 

852 

 

 

101 

 

Interest income recorded

 

 

 

 

 

 



44

 


 

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES



Management maintains liquidity to meet depositors’ needs for funds, to satisfy or fund loan commitments, and for other operating purposes.  DNB’s foundation for liquidity is a stable and loyal customer deposit base, cash and cash equivalents, and a marketable investment portfolio that provides periodic cash flow through regular maturities and amortization, or that can be used as collateral to secure funding.  As part of its liquidity management, DNB maintains assets that comprise its liquidity, which totaled $121.4 million at June 30, 2017 compared to $101.4 million at December 31, 2016Liquidity includes investments and restricted stock, Federal funds sold and cash and due from banks, less the amount of securities required to be pledged for certain liabilities. DNB also anticipates scheduled payments and prepayments on its loan and mortgage-backed securities portfolios.



In addition, DNB maintains borrowing arrangements with various correspondent banks, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh and the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia to meet short-term liquidity needs.  Through these relationships, DNB had available credit of approximately $507.3 million at June 30, 2017.  As a member of the FHLB, we are eligible to borrow up to a specific credit limit which is determined by the amount of our residential mortgages, commercial mortgages and other loans that have been pledged as collateral. As of June 30, 2017,  DNB’s Maximum Borrowing Capacity with the FHLBP was $447.3 million. At June 30, 2017, DNB had borrowed $49.9 million and the FHLB had issued letters of credit, on DNB's behalf, totaling $90.0 million against its available credit lines. At June 30, 2017,  DNB also had available $60.0 million of unsecured federal funds lines of credit with other financial institutions as well as $164.0 million of available short or long term funding through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) program and $178.6 million of available short or long term funding through Raymond James’ brokered CDs agreement. Management believes that DNB has adequate resources to meet its short-term and long-term funding requirements.



At June 30, 2017, DNB had $178.3 million in un-funded loan commitments. Management anticipates these commitments will be funded by means of normal cash flows. Certificates of deposit greater than or equal to $250,000 scheduled to mature in one year or less from June 30, 2017 totaled $47.9 million. Management believes that the majority of such deposits will be reinvested with DNB and that certificates that are not renewed will be funded by a reduction in cash and cash equivalents or by pay-downs and maturities of loans and investments.



The Corporation and the Bank have each met the definition of “well capitalized” for regulatory purposes on June 30, 2017.  The Bank’s capital category is determined for the purposes of applying the bank regulators’ “prompt corrective action” regulations and for determining levels of deposit insurance assessments and may not constitute an accurate representation of the Corporation’s or the Bank’s overall financial condition or prospects. The Corporation’s capital exceeds the FRB’s minimum leverage ratio requirements for bank holding companies (see additional discussion included in Note 17 of DNB’s December 31, 2016 Form 10-K).



Under federal banking laws and regulations, DNB and the Bank are required to maintain minimum capital as determined by certain regulatory ratios. Capital adequacy for regulatory purposes, and the capital category assigned to an institution by its regulators, may be determinative of an institution’s overall financial condition. Under the final capital rules that became effective on January 1, 2015, there was a requirement for a common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets which is in addition to the other minimum risk-based capital standards in the rule. Institutions that do not maintain this required capital buffer will become subject to progressively more stringent limitations on the percentage of earnings that can be paid out in dividends or used for stock repurchases and on the payment of discretionary bonuses to senior executive management. The capital buffer requirement is being phased in over three years beginning in 2016. DNB must hold a capital conservation buffer above the adequately capitalized risk-based capital ratios. The capital conservation buffer is being phased in from 0.0% to 2.50% by 2019. The capital conservation buffer is 1.25% and 0.625% for 2017 and 2016, respectively. 



45

 


 

 

The following table summarizes data and ratios pertaining to the Corporation and the Bank's capital structure.





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To Be Well

 



 

 

 

 

 

For Capital

 

 

Capitalized Under

 



 

 

 

 

 

Adequacy

 

 

Prompt Corrective

 



 

Actual

 

 

Purposes*

 

 

Action Provisions

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Amount

Ratio

 

 

Amount

Ratio

 

 

Amount

Ratio

 

DNB Financial Corporation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total risk-based capital

$

109,967  13.15 

%

$

77,333  9.250 

%

 

N/A

N/A

 

Common Equity Tier 1 capital

 

85,610  10.24 

 

 

48,072  5.750 

 

 

N/A

N/A

 

Tier 1 risk-based capital

 

94,610  11.32 

 

 

60,613  7.250 

 

 

N/A

N/A

 

Tier 1 (leverage) capital

 

94,610  8.80 

 

 

43,007  4.000 

 

 

N/A

N/A

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total risk-based capital

$

105,669  12.50 

%

$

72,924  8.625 

%

 

N/A

N/A

 

Common equity tier 1 capital

 

81,201  9.60 

 

 

43,332  5.125 

 

 

N/A

N/A

 

Tier 1 risk-based capital

 

90,201  10.67 

 

 

56,014  6.625 

 

 

N/A

N/A

 

Tier 1 (leverage) capital

 

90,201  8.42 

 

 

42,864  4.000 

 

 

N/A

N/A

 

DNB First, N.A.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total risk-based capital

$

108,081  12.95 

%

$

77,182  9.250 

%

$

93,870  11.25 

%

Common Equity Tier 1 capital

 

102,474  12.28 

 

 

47,978  5.750 

 

 

64,666  7.75 

 

Tier 1 risk-based capital

 

102,474  12.28 

 

 

60,494  7.250 

 

 

77,182  9.25 

 

Tier 1 (leverage) capital

 

102,474  9.54 

 

 

42,957  4.000 

 

 

53,697  5.00 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total risk-based capital

$

103,094  12.22 

%

$

72,785  8.625 

%

$

84,388  10.00 

%

Common equity tier 1 capital

 

97,376  11.54 

 

 

43,249  5.125 

 

 

54,852  6.50 

 

Tier 1 risk-based capital

 

97,376  11.54 

 

 

55,907  6.625 

 

 

67,511  8.00 

 

Tier 1 (leverage) capital

 

97,376  9.09 

 

 

42,830  4.000 

 

 

53,537  5.00 

 

*Capital conversion buffer of 1.25% and 0.625% included for June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

 

In addition, the Federal Reserve Bank (the "FRB") leverage ratio rules require bank holding companies to maintain a minimum level of "primary capital" to total assets of 5.5% and a minimum level of "total capital" to total assets of 6%.  For this purpose, (i) "primary capital" includes, among other items, common stock, certain perpetual debt instruments such as eligible Trust preferred securities, contingency and other capital reserves, and the allowance for loan losses, (ii) "total capital" includes, among other things, certain subordinated debt, and "total assets" is increased by the allowance for loan losses.  DNB's primary capital ratio and its total capital ratio are both well in excess of FRB requirements.



REGULATORY MATTERS



Dividends payable to the Corporation by the Bank are subject to certain regulatory limitations. Under normal circumstances, the payment of dividends in any year without regulatory permission is limited to the net profits (as defined for regulatory purposes) for that year, plus the retained net profits for the preceding two calendar years.

46

 


 

 

ITEM 3 - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK



To measure the impacts of longer-term asset and liability mismatches beyond two years, DNB utilizes an Economic Value of Equity ("EVE") model. The EVE model measures the potential price risk of equity to changes in interest rates and factors in the optionality included on the balance sheet. EVE analysis is used to dynamically model the present value of asset and liability cash flows, with rates ranging up or down 200 basis points. The EVE is likely to be different if rates change. Results falling outside prescribed ranges may require action by management. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, DNB's variance in the EVE as a percentage of assets with an instantaneous and sustained parallel shift of 200 basis points was within its negative 3% guideline, as shown in the following table. The change as a percentage of the present value of equity with a 200 basis point increase was within DNB's negative 25% guideline at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. 







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

June 30, 2017

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

Change in rates

 

Flat

 

 

-200bp

 

 

+200bp

 

 

Flat

 

 

-200bp

 

 

+200bp

 

EVE

$

122,293 

 

$

107,249 

 

$

121,276 

 

$

118,298 

 

$

111,279 

 

$

114,771 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

(15,044)

 

 

(1,017)

 

 

 

 

 

(7,019)

 

 

(3,527)

 

Change as % of assets

 

 

 

 

(1.4%)

 

 

(0.1%)

 

 

 

 

 

(0.7%)

 

 

(0.3%)

 

Change as % of PV equity

 

 

 

 

(12.3%)

 

 

(0.8%)

 

 

 

 

 

(5.9%)

 

 

(3.0%)

 



ITEM 4- CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES



DNB’s Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of June 30, 2017, the end of the period covered by this report, in accordance with the requirements of Exchange Act Rule 240.13a-15(b). Based on that evaluation, Management has concluded that DNB’s current disclosure controls and procedures are effective.



Management of DNB is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for DNB, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  There was no change in DNB’s “internal control over financial reporting” (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2017, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, DNB’s internal control over financial reporting.



PART II - OTHER INFORMATION



ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS



Neither DNB nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to, nor is any of their property the subject of, any material legal proceedings other than ordinary routine litigation incident to their businesses.



ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS



In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in“Risk Factors” included within the 2016 Form 10-K. The risks described therein are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.



ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS



There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the quarter ended June 30, 2017. The following table provides information on repurchases by DNB of its common stock in each month of the quarter ended June 30, 2017:





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

Total Number of

 

Maximum Number



 

 

 

 

 

Shares Purchased

 

of Shares that May



 

Total Number

 

Average

 

as Part of Publicly

 

Yet Be Purchased



 

Of Shares

 

Price Paid

 

Announced Plans

 

Under the Plans or

Period

 

Purchased

 

Per Share

 

or Programs

 

Programs (a)



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

April 1, 2017 – April 30, 2017

 

 -

$

 -

 

 -

$

63,016 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 1, 2017 – May 31, 2017

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

$

63,016 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 1, 2017 – June 30, 2017

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

$

63,016 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 -

$

 -

 

 -

$

63,016 



On July 25, 2001, DNB authorized the buyback of up to 175,000 shares of its common stock over an indefinite period. On August 27, 2004, DNB increased the buyback from 175,000 to 325,000 shares of its common stock over an indefinite period.

47

 


 

 

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES



None.



ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES



Not Applicable.



ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION



None.

19

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS



a) The following exhibits are filed or furnished herewith:



 

 

Exhibit Number

Description



 

 

2.1

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between DNB Financial Corporation and East River Bank, dated as of April 4, 2016, filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K on April 5, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.1

 

Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended effective June 30, 2017, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K on July 3, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.2

 

Bylaws of the Registrant as amended January 27, 2016, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K on January 29, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference.

31.1

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14 (a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer, filed herewith.

31.2

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14 (a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer, filed herewith.

32.1

 

Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer, filed herewith.

32.2

 

Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer, filed herewith.

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document



48

 


 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





 

 

overmber

 

 



 

DNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION



 

 

August 11, 2017

BY:

/s/ William J. Hieb



 

William J. Hieb, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director



 

 



 

 



 

 

August 11, 2017

BY:

/s/ Gerald F. Sopp



 

Gerald F. Sopp, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President



 

 



 

 



49

 


 

 





 

 



 

Exhibit Number

 

Exhibit Index

 

 

Description

2.1

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between DNB Financial Corporation and East River Bank, dated as of April 4, 2016, filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K on April 5, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.1

 

Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended effective June 30, 2017, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K on July 3, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.2

 

Bylaws of the Registrant as amended January 27, 2016, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K on January 29, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference.

31.1

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14 (a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer, filed herewith.

31.2

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14 (a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer, filed herewith.

32.1

 

Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer, filed herewith.

32.2

 

Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer, filed herewith.

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document



 



50