Steadfast Income REIT, Inc. - FORM 8-K - EX-99.1 - EXHIBIT 99.1

Attached files

file	filename
8-K - 8-K - Steadfast Income REIT, Inc.	a20160811form8-kreearnings.htm

Exhibit 99.1



		18100 Von Karman Avenue Suite 500 Irvine, CA 92612 949.852.0700

NEWS RELEASE


Contact:	Jennifer Franklin


Phone:	949.333.1721


Email:	jfranklin@steadfastcmg.com

STEADFAST INCOME REIT, INC. ANNOUNCES

RESULTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

Irvine, Calif., August 11, 2016 — Steadfast Income REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) announced today its operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company had total revenues of $54.0 million and $106.9 million compared to $52.2 million and $103.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Net loss was $8.0 million and $11.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to net loss of $2.9 million and $6.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Total assets of the Company increased from $1.57 billion at December 31, 2015 to $1.59 billion at June 30, 2016.

Highlights:

The Company:


•	Increased net operating income (“NOI”) to $28.0 million and $56.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 from $27.8 million and $55.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. (See the reconciliation of NOI to net loss and accompanying notes contained within this release for additional information on how the Company calculates NOI.)

•

Experienced a decrease in modified funds from operations (“MFFO”), as defined by the Investment Program Association, from MFFO of $13.6 million and $27.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 to $10.6 million and $24.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. This decrease was primarily due to costs associated with the refinancing of 14 multifamily properties during the quarter ended June 30, 2016. (See the reconciliation of MFFO to net loss and accompanying notes contained within this release for additional information on how the Company calculates MFFO.)

•

Experienced a decrease in funds from operations (“FFO”), as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, from FFO of $13.3 million and $25.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 to FFO of $9.2 million and $22.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. This decrease was primarily due to costs associated with the refinancing of 14 multifamily properties during the quarter ended June 30, 2016. (See the reconciliation of FFO to net loss and accompanying notes contained within this release for additional information on how the Company calculates FFO.)


•	Funded $12.7 million for improvements to real estate investments for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $15.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

•

Owned a multifamily property portfolio at June 30, 2016 of 65 properties comprising 16,647 apartment homes with an aggregate purchase price of $1.6 billion. As of June 30, 2016, the Company had $474.3 million of fixed rate debt with a weighted average interest rate of 4.32% and $709.1 million of variable rate debt with a weighted average interest rate of 2.74%. The weighted average interest rate on the Company's total outstanding debt as of June 30, 2016 was 3.37%.


•	Reported net cash provided by operating activities of $23.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $22.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Net cash used in investing activities was $11.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $15.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.


•	Reported net cash provided by financing activities of $37.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, that included $27.5 million of distributions paid, all of which were paid in cash. Net cash used in financing activities was $4.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, that included $27.5 million of distributions paid, all of which were paid in cash.

“In the second quarter of this year, home ownership rates dropped to 62.9 percent, according to population statistics released this month by the U.S. Census Bureau. We believe this is primarily due to Americans increasingly choosing the ease and convenience of apartment living. Steadfast seeks to provide well-located, well-maintained properties that fit most renters' paychecks. When we spend money to selectively improve the interior aesthetics of our individual apartment homes, we are providing our residents with a home that feels like a luxury apartment but at a moderate income price,” said Ella Neyland, president of the Company.

About Steadfast Income REIT

Steadfast Income REIT is a real estate investment trust that was formed to acquire and operate a diverse portfolio of real estate investments focused primarily on the multifamily sector, including stable, income-producing and value-added properties.

Steadfast Income REIT is sponsored by Steadfast REIT Investments, LLC, an affiliate of Steadfast Companies, an Orange County, California-based group of affiliated real estate investment and operating companies that acquire, develop and manage real estate in the U.S. and Mexico.

###

This release contains certain forward-looking statements. Words such as "anticipates", "expects", "intends", "plans", "believes", "seeks", "estimates", "may" and "should" and their variations identify forward-looking statements. Because such statements include risks, uncertainties and contingencies, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on any such statements. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this release. Such factors include those described in the Risk Factors section of the Company's public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements in this document speak only as of the date on which such statements were made, and the company undertakes no obligation to update any such statements that may become untrue because of subsequent events. Such forward-looking statements are subject to the safe harbor protection for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

FINANCIAL TABLES, NOTES AND EXHIBITS FOLLOW

STEADFAST INCOME REIT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS



	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Assets:
Real Estate:
Land	$	174,102,422		$	174,102,422
Building and improvements	1,498,605,615			1,487,961,762
Other intangible assets	2,644,263			2,644,263
Construction-in-progress	4,869,498			2,192,635
Total real estate, cost	1,680,221,798			1,666,901,082
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(197,497,998		)	(163,445,987		)
Total real estate, net	1,482,723,800			1,503,455,095
Cash and cash equivalents	80,800,943			32,076,582
Restricted cash	22,756,133			27,700,811
Rents and other receivables	3,320,821			2,742,011
Other assets, net	2,655,208			4,328,851
Total assets	$	1,592,256,905		$	1,570,303,350
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	35,471,070		$	40,752,458
Mortgage notes payable, net	1,183,354,251			1,115,752,899
Distributions payable	4,492,374			4,668,261
Due to affiliates	3,275,462			2,682,209
Total liabilities	1,226,593,157			1,163,855,827
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding	—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 999,999,000 shares authorized, 76,479,044 and 76,674,502 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively	764,791			766,745
Convertible stock, $0.01 par value per share; 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively	10			10
Additional paid-in capital	675,823,217			677,624,840
Cumulative distributions and net losses	(310,924,270		)	(271,944,072		)
Total stockholders’ equity	365,663,748			406,447,523
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,592,256,905		$	1,570,303,350

STEADFAST INCOME REIT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Revenues:
Rental income	$	47,932,721		$	46,388,918		$	95,103,356		$	91,921,505
Tenant reimbursements and other	6,089,902			5,854,884			11,826,176			11,373,597
Total revenues	54,022,623			52,243,802			106,929,532			103,295,102
Expenses:
Operating, maintenance and management	13,903,048			12,766,597			27,612,858			25,593,749
Real estate taxes and insurance	10,048,699			9,730,344			18,959,719			18,785,743
Fees to affiliates	7,362,697			5,413,367			12,885,120			10,781,843
Depreciation and amortization	17,216,777			16,182,016			34,164,045			32,336,326
Interest expense	10,140,476			9,520,362			20,187,315			19,507,596
Loss on debt extinguishment	1,189,044			—			1,189,044			—
General and administrative expenses	2,201,102			1,535,545			3,588,789			3,017,775
Acquisition costs	—			—			—			7,145
Total expenses	62,061,843			55,148,231			118,586,890			110,030,177
Net loss	$	(8,039,220	)	$	(2,904,429	)	$	(11,657,358	)	$	(6,735,075	)
Loss per common share — basic and diluted	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.09	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic and diluted	76,252,947			76,353,485			76,301,454			76,353,485
Distributions declared per common share	$	0.178		$	0.179		$	0.356		$	0.356

Steadfast Income REIT, Inc.

Non-GAAP Measures - FFO and MFFO Reconciliation

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, as discussed below, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT"), an industry trade group, has promulgated a measure known as funds from operations ("FFO"), which the Company believes to be an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a real estate investment trust ("REIT"). The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. FFO is not equivalent to the Company's net income or loss as determined under GAAP.

The Company defines FFO, a non-GAAP financial measure, consistent with the standards established by the White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, as revised in February 2004 (the "White Paper"). The White Paper defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property and non-cash impairment charges of real estate related investments, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. In particular, the Company believes it is appropriate to disregard impairment charges, as this is a fair value adjustment that is largely based on market fluctuations and assessments regarding general market conditions which can change over time. An asset will only be evaluated for impairment if certain impairment indications exist and if the carrying, or book value, exceeds the total estimated undiscounted future cash flows (including net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and any other ancillary cash flows at a property or group level under GAAP) from such asset. Investors should note, however, that determinations of whether impairment charges have been incurred are based partly on anticipated operating performance, because estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property, including estimated future net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of FFO as described above, investors are cautioned that due to the fact that impairments are based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows and the relatively limited term of the Company's operations, it could be difficult to recover any impairment charges. The Company's FFO calculation complies with NAREIT’s policy described above.

The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, especially if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances and/or as requested or required by lessees for operational purposes in order to maintain the value disclosed. The Company believes that since real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation may be less informative. Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, the Company believes that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate related depreciation and amortization, provides a more complete understanding of its performance to investors and to management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on its operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income. However, FFO, and modified funds from operations ("MFFO") as described below, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or in its applicability in evaluating the

Company's operating performance. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.

Changes in the accounting and reporting promulgations under GAAP (for acquisition fees and expenses from a capitalization/depreciation model to an expensed-as-incurred model) that were put into effect in 2009 and other changes to GAAP accounting for real estate subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT’s definition of FFO have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, specifically acquisition fees and expenses for all industries as items that are expensed under GAAP, that are typically accounted for as operating expenses. The Company's management believes these fees and expenses do not affect the Company's overall long-term operating performance. Publicly registered, non-listed REITs typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operation. While other start-up entities may also experience significant acquisition activity during their initial years, the Company believes that public, non-listed REITs, are unique in that they have a limited life with targeted exit strategies within a relatively limited time frame after acquisition activity ceases. The Company's board of directors will determine to pursue a liquidity event when it believes that the then-current market conditions are favorable. Thus, as a limited life REIT the Company will not continuously purchase assets and will have a limited life.

Due to the above factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, the Investment Program Association ("IPA"), an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as MFFO, which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental measure for publicly registered non-listed REITs and which the Company believes to be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a public, non-listed REIT having the characteristics described above. MFFO is not equivalent to net income or loss as determined under GAAP, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if the Company does not continue to operate with a limited life and targeted exit strategy, as currently intended. The Company believes that, because MFFO excludes costs that it considers more reflective of investing activities and other non-operating items included in FFO and also excludes acquisition fees and expenses that affect its operations only in periods in which properties are acquired, MFFO can provide, on a going forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of its operating performance after the period in which it is acquiring properties and once its portfolio is in place. By providing MFFO, the Company believes it is presenting useful information that assists investors and analysts to better assess the sustainability of its operating performance after its offering has been completed and its properties have been acquired. The Company also believes that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the non-listed REIT industry. Further, the Company believes MFFO is useful in comparing the sustainability of its operating performance after its offering and acquisitions are completed with the sustainability of the operating performance of other real estate companies that are not as involved in acquisition activities. Investors are cautioned that MFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of the Company's operating performance after its offering has been completed and properties have been acquired, as it excludes acquisition costs that have a negative effect on the Company's operating performance during the periods in which properties are acquired.

The Company defines MFFO, a non-GAAP financial measure, consistent with the IPA’s Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds from Operations (the "Practice Guideline"), issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for the following items, as applicable, included in the determination of GAAP net income: acquisition fees and expenses; amounts relating to deferred rent receivables and amortization of above and below market leases and liabilities (which are adjusted in order to reflect such

payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments); accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; nonrecurring gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. The accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, nonrecurring unrealized gains and losses on hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings, unrealized gains and losses resulting from consolidations, as well as other listed cash flow adjustments are adjustments made to net income in calculating the cash flows provided by operating activities and, in some cases, reflect gains or losses which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized. While the Company relies on its external advisor for managing interest rate, hedge and foreign exchange risk, the Company does not retain an outside consultant to review all of its hedging agreements. Inasmuch as interest rate hedges are not a fundamental part of the Company's operations, the Company believes it is appropriate to exclude such non-recurring gains and losses in calculating MFFO, as such gains and losses are not reflective of on-going operations.

The Company's MFFO calculation complies with the IPA’s Practice Guideline described above. In calculating MFFO, the Company excludes acquisition related expenses, amortization of above and below market leases, fair value adjustments of derivative financial instruments, deferred rent receivables and the adjustments of such items related to noncontrolling interests. Under GAAP, acquisition fees and expenses are characterized as operating expenses in determining operating net income. These expenses are paid in cash by the Company. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by the Company, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property. In the event that operational earnings and cash flow are not available to fund its reimbursement of acquisition fees and expenses incurred by its advisor, such fees and expenses will need to be reimbursed to the advisor from other sources, including debt, net proceeds from the sale of properties, or from ancillary cash flows. The acquisition of properties, and the corresponding acquisition fees and expenses, is the key operational feature of the Company's business plan to generate operational income and cash flow to fund distributions to stockholders. Further, under GAAP, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income in determining cash flow from operating activities. In addition, the Company views fair value adjustments of derivatives and gains and losses from dispositions of assets as non-recurring items or items which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized, and which are not reflective of on-going operations and are therefore typically adjusted for when assessing operating performance.

The Company's management uses MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate MFFO in order to evaluate the Company's performance against other public, non-listed REITs which have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if the Company does not continue to operate in this manner. The Company believes that its use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate MFFO allow the Company to present its performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to public, non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence that the use of such measures is useful to investors. By excluding expensed acquisition costs, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with the Company's management's analysis of the operating

performance of the properties. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as rental and occupancy rates, may not be directly related or attributable to the Company's current operating performance. By excluding such changes that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gains or losses, the Company believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information.

Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance to that of other public, non-listed REITs, although it should be noted that not all public, non-listed REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way, so comparisons with other public, non-listed REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or income (loss) from continuing operations as an indication of the Company's performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations as an indication of the Company's liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund the Company's cash needs, including the Company's ability to make distributions to stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with GAAP measurements as an indication of the Company's performance. MFFO is useful in assisting the Company's management and investors in assessing the sustainability of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete and net asset value is disclosed. MFFO is not a useful measure in evaluating net asset value because impairments are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining MFFO.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), NAREIT nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that the Company uses to calculate FFO or MFFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the non-listed REIT industry and in response to such standardization the Company may have to adjust its calculation and characterization of FFO or MFFO accordingly.

The Company's calculation of FFO and MFFO is presented in the following table for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (amounts unaudited):



	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
Reconciliation of net loss to MFFO:	2016			2015			2016			2015
Net loss	$	(8,039,220	)	$	(2,904,429	)	$	(11,657,358	)	$	(6,735,075	)
Depreciation of real estate assets	17,178,485			16,138,343			34,087,461			32,043,956
Amortization of lease-related costs	38,292			43,673			76,584			292,370
FFO	9,177,557			13,277,587			22,506,687			25,601,251
Acquisition expenses⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	960			—			960			7,145
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments	212,559			346,588			445,272			1,368,174
Loss on debt extinguishment	1,189,044			—			1,189,044			—
Change in value of restricted common stock to Advisor	57,088			5,233			170,695			22,140
MFFO	$	10,637,208		$	13,629,408		$	24,312,658		$	26,998,710

___________

(1)

By excluding expensed acquisition costs, management believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for each type of real estate investment and is consistent with management's analysis of the investing and operating performance of the Company's properties. Acquisition fees and expenses include payments to the Company's advisor or third parties. Acquisition fees and expenses under GAAP are considered operating expenses and as expenses included in the determination of net income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations, both of which are performance measures under GAAP. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by the Company, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to the property. In the event that operational earnings and cash flow are not available to fund the Company's reimbursement of acquisition fees and expenses incurred by the Company's advisor, such fees and expenses will need to be reimbursed to the advisor from other sources, including debt, net proceeds from the sale of properties, or from ancillary cash flows.

(2)

Acquisition fees and expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 include acquisition fees of $960 and $960 and acquisition fees of $0 and $0 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, that are recorded in fees to affiliates in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Acquisition fees and expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 also include acquisition expenses of $0 and $0 and acquisition expenses of $0 and $7,145 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, that are recorded in acquisition costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Steadfast Income REIT, Inc.

Non-GAAP Measures - Net Operating Income

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

Net Operating Income ("NOI") is a non-GAAP financial measure of performance. NOI is used by investors and the Company's management to evaluate and compare the performance of the Company's properties and to determine trends in earnings and to compute the fair value of the Company's properties as it is not affected by (1) the cost of funds of the Company, (2) acquisition costs of the Company, (3) non-operating fees paid to affiliates, (4) the impact of depreciation and amortization expenses as well as gains or losses from the sale of operating real estate assets that are included in net income computed in accordance with GAAP, or (5) general and administrative expenses and other gains and losses that are specific to the Company. The cost of funds is eliminated from net income because it is specific to the particular financing capabilities and constraints of the Company. The cost of funds is also eliminated because it is dependent on historical interest rates and other costs of capital as well as past decisions made by the Company regarding the appropriate mix of capital which may have changed or may change in the future. Acquisition costs and non-operating fees to affiliates are eliminated because they do not reflect continuing operating costs of the Company. Depreciation and amortization expenses as well as gains or losses from the sale of operating real estate assets are eliminated because they may not accurately represent the actual change in value in the Company's multifamily properties that result from use of the properties or changes in market conditions. While certain aspects of real property do decline in value over time in a manner that is reasonably captured by depreciation and amortization, the value of the properties as a whole have historically increased or decreased as a result of changes in overall economic conditions instead of from actual use of the property or the passage of time. Gains and losses from the sale of real property vary from property to property and are affected by market conditions at the time of sale which will usually change from period to period. These gains and losses can create distortions when comparing one period to another or when comparing the Company's operating results to the operating results of other real estate companies that have not made similarly timed purchases or sales. The Company believes that eliminating these costs from net (loss) income is useful because the resulting measure captures the actual revenue generated and actual expenses incurred in operating its properties as well as trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs.

However, the usefulness of NOI is limited because it excludes general and administrative costs, interest expense, interest income and other expense, acquisition costs, certain fees paid to affiliates, depreciation and amortization expense and gains or losses from the sale of properties, and other gains and losses as stipulated by GAAP, the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of the Company's properties, all of which are significant economic costs. NOI may fail to capture significant trends in these components of net income which further limits its usefulness.

NOI is a measure of the operating performance of the Company's properties but does not measure the Company's performance as a whole. NOI is therefore not a substitute for net (loss) income as computed in accordance with GAAP. This measure should be analyzed in conjunction with net (loss) income computed in accordance with GAAP. Other companies may use different methods for calculating NOI or similarly entitled measures and, accordingly, the Company's NOI may not be comparable to similarly entitled measures reported by other companies that do not define the measure exactly as the Company does.

The following is a reconciliation of the Company's NOI to net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (amounts unaudited):



	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Net loss	$	(8,039,220	)	$	(2,904,429	)	$	(11,657,358	)	$	(6,735,075	)
Fees to affiliates⁽¹⁾	5,302,135			3,454,795			8,803,259			6,896,717
Depreciation and amortization	17,216,777			16,182,016			34,164,045			32,336,326
Interest expense	10,140,476			9,520,362			20,187,315			19,507,596
Loss on debt extinguishment	1,189,044			—			1,189,044			—
General and administrative expenses	2,201,102			1,535,545			3,588,789			3,017,775
Acquisition costs	—			—			—			7,145
Net operating income	$	28,010,314		$	27,788,289		$	56,275,094		$	55,030,484

________________

(1)

Fees to affiliates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 excludes property management fees of $1,600,657 and $3,172,639 and other fees of $459,905 and $909,222, respectively, that are included in NOI. Fees to affiliates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 excludes property management fees of $1,547,586 and $3,050,754 and other fees of $410,986 and $834,372, respectively, that are included in NOI.

EXHIBIT A





Monthly Portfolio Snapshot	\|	APRIL 2016

Property		Location	Total Units	Non-Revenue Units	Rentable Units	Average Occupied Units	Average % Occupied	% Leased
Multi-Family
Park Place Condominiums		Des Moines, IA	151	—	151	137	90.7%	95.0%
Clarion Park Apartments		Olathe, KS	220	1	219	215	97.7%	99.6%
Cooper Creek Village Apartments		Louisville, KY	123	—	123	116	94.3%	95.3%
Truman Farm Villas		Grandview, MO	200	1	199	194	97.0%	99.5%
EBT Lofts		Kansas City, MO	102	—	102	99	97.1%	99.0%
Windsor on the River Apartments		Cedar Rapids, IA	424	—	424	397	93.6%	95.7%
Renaissance at St. Andrews		Louisville, KY	216	—	216	212	98.1%	98.8%
Spring Creek Apartments		Edmond, OK	252	2	250	234	92.9%	96.4%
Montclair Parc Apartment Homes		Oklahoma City, OK	360	2	358	343	95.3%	96.9%
Sonoma Grande Apartments		Tulsa, OK	336	1	335	324	96.4%	97.8%
Estancia Apartments		Tulsa, OK	294	1	293	286	97.3%	99.4%
Montelena Apartments		Round Rock, TX	232	1	231	220	94.8%	96.3%
Valley Farms Apartment Homes		Louisville, KY	160	1	159	152	95.0%	97.0%
Hilliard Park Apartments		Columbus, OH	201	1	200	190	94.5%	96.7%
Sycamore Terrace Apartments		Terre Haute, IN	250	1	249	236	94.4%	99.0%
Hilliard Summit Apartments		Columbus, OH	208	1	207	196	94.2%	98.5%
Springmarc Apartments		San Marcos, TX	240	1	239	234	97.5%	98.8%
Renaissance at St. Andrews Condominiums		Louisville, KY	29	—	29	29	100.0%	100.0%
Ashley Oaks Apartment Homes		San Antonio, TX	462	2	460	445	96.3%	98.0%
Arrowhead Apartment Homes		Palatine, IL	200	1	199	195	97.5%	99.2%
The Moorings Apartments		Roselle, IL	216	1	215	207	95.8%	99.1%
Forty 57 Apartments		Lexington, KY	436	1	435	417	95.6%	96.9%
Keystone Farms Apartments		Nashville, TN	90	—	90	88	97.8%	99.1%
Riverford Crossing Apartments		Frankfort, KY	300	1	299	286	95.3%	96.8%
Valley Farms North		Louisville, KY	128	1	127	121	94.5%	96.2%
Montecito Apartments		Austin, TX	268	2	266	255	95.1%	98.2%
Hilliard Grand Apartments		Dublin, OH	314	1	313	301	95.9%	98.6%
The Hills at Fair Oaks		Fair Oaks Ranch, TX	288	2	286	273	94.8%	96.4%
Library Lofts East		Kansas City, MO	118	—	118	106	89.8%	91.4%
Trails at Buda Ranch		Buda, TX	264	1	263	252	95.5%	96.4%
Deep Deuce at Bricktown		Oklahoma City, OK	294	2	292	274	93.2%	98.8%
Deer Valley Apartments		Lake Bluff, IL	224	1	223	210	93.8%	96.2%
Grayson Ridge Apartment Homes		North Richland Hills, TX	240	1	239	233	97.1%	98.8%
Rosemont Olmos Park Apartments		San Antonio, TX	144	1	143	138	95.8%	98.2%
Retreat at Quail North		Oklahoma City, OK	240	1	239	228	95.0%	97.1%
Lodge at Trails Edge		Indianapolis, IN	268	1	267	256	95.5%	98.4%
Arbors of Carrolton		Carrolton, TX	131	—	131	127	96.9%	97.6%
Waterford on the Meadow		Plato, TX	350	—	350	333	95.1%	96.1%



Property	Location	Total Units	Non-Revenue Units	Rentable Units	Average Occupied Units	Average % Occupied	% Leased
Multi-Family (continued)
The Belmont	Grand Prairie, TX	260	—	260	250	96.2%	98.1%
Meritage at Steiner Ranch	Austin, TX	502	4	498	463	92.2%	95.7%
Tapestry Park Apartments	Birmingham, AL	354	1	353	325	91.8%	94.1%
Dawntree Apartments	Carrolton, TX	400	—	400	386	96.5%	98.0%
Stuart Hall Lofts	Kansas City, MO	115	—	115	108	93.9%	96.2%
Bricegrove Park Apartments	Canal Winchester, OH	240	—	240	229	95.4%	97.7%
Retreat at Hamburg Place	Lexington, KY	150	1	149	140	93.3%	95.5%
Cantare at Indian Lake Village	Hendersonville, TN	206	1	205	193	93.7%	94.9%
The Landing at Mansfield	Mansfield, TX	336	2	334	322	95.8%	97.3%
Heights at 2121	Houston, TX	504	12	492	464	92.1%	95.2%
Villas at Huffmeister	Houston, TX	294	1	293	264	89.8%	92.9%
Villas at Kingwood	Kingwood, TX	330	1	329	313	94.8%	96.3%
Waterford Place at Riata Ranch	Cypress, TX	228	1	227	213	93.4%	96.5%
Carrington Place	Houston, TX	324	1	323	298	92.0%	94.1%
Carrington at Champion Forest	Houston, TX	284	1	283	270	95.1%	96.4%
Carrington Park at Huffmeister	Cypress, TX	232	1	231	216	93.1%	96.0%
Willow Crossing Apartments	Elk Grove Village, IL	579	2	577	535	92.4%	95.0%
Echo at Katy Ranch	Katy, TX	260	1	259	221	85.0%	90.4%
Heritage Grand at Sienna Plantation	Missouri City, TX	240	1	239	223	92.9%	94.5%
Audubon Park Apartments	Nashville, TN	256	—	256	237	92.6%	95.2%
Mallard Crossing Apartments	Loveland, OH	350	2	348	328	93.7%	95.9%
Renaissance at Carol Stream	Carol Stream, IL	293	1	292	277	94.5%	96.4%
Reserve at Creekside	Chattanooga, TN	192	1	191	182	94.8%	97.4%
Mapleshade Park	Dallas, TX	148	1	147	140	94.6%	98.9%
Richland Falls	Murfreesboro, TN	190	1	189	188	98.9%	100.0%
Oak Crossing Apartments	Fort Wayne, IN	222	1	221	205	92.3%	97.5%
Park Shore Apartments	St. Charles, IL	160	—	160	150	93.8%	97.5%
Total		16,622	72	16,550	15,699	94.4%	96.8%


		Total Units	Total Square Footage	Occupied Square Footage	% Occupied
Commercial
Library Lofts Commercial	Kansas City, MO	2	16,680	12,480	78.8%
Stuart Hall Commercial	Kansas City, MO	1	4,450	4,450	100.0%
Meritage at Steiner Ranch Commercial	Austin, TX	1	4,843	—	—%
Total		4	25,973	16,930	65.2%





Monthly Portfolio Snapshot	\|	MAY 2016

Property		Location	Total Units	Non-Revenue Units	Rentable Units	Average Occupied Units	Average % Occupied	% Leased
Multi-Family
Park Place Condominiums		Des Moines, IA	151	—	151	139	92.1%	99.0%
Clarion Park Apartments		Olathe, KS	220	1	219	211	95.9%	96.2%
Cooper Creek Village Apartments		Louisville, KY	123	—	123	116	94.3%	95.9%
Truman Farm Villas		Grandview, MO	200	1	199	196	98.0%	100.0%
EBT Lofts		Kansas City, MO	102	—	102	96	94.1%	99.3%
Windsor on the River Apartments		Cedar Rapids, IA	424	—	424	404	95.3%	97.7%
Renaissance at St. Andrews		Louisville, KY	216	—	216	206	95.4%	96.4%
Spring Creek Apartments		Edmond, OK	252	2	250	238	94.4%	97.1%
Montclair Parc Apartment Homes		Oklahoma City, OK	360	2	358	349	96.9%	98.7%
Sonoma Grande Apartments		Tulsa, OK	336	1	335	321	95.5%	97.4%
Estancia Apartments		Tulsa, OK	294	1	293	285	96.9%	98.0%
Montelena Apartments		Round Rock, TX	232	1	231	227	97.8%	99.6%
Valley Farms Apartment Homes		Louisville, KY	160	1	159	155	96.9%	98.0%
Hilliard Park Apartments		Columbus, OH	201	1	200	191	95.0%	97.0%
Sycamore Terrace Apartments		Terre Haute, IN	250	1	249	243	97.2%	100.0%
Hilliard Summit Apartments		Columbus, OH	208	1	207	198	95.2%	99.2%
Springmarc Apartments		San Marcos, TX	240	1	239	233	97.1%	99.3%
Renaissance at St. Andrews Condominiums		Louisville, KY	30	—	30	27	90.0%	94.9%
Ashley Oaks Apartment Homes		San Antonio, TX	462	2	460	444	96.1%	97.6%
Arrowhead Apartment Homes		Palatine, IL	200	1	199	192	96.0%	97.9%
The Moorings Apartments		Roselle, IL	216	1	215	204	94.4%	99.1%
Forty 57 Apartments		Lexington, KY	436	1	435	415	95.2%	97.5%
Keystone Farms Apartments		Nashville, TN	90	—	90	87	96.7%	98.6%
Riverford Crossing Apartments		Frankfort, KY	300	1	299	288	96.0%	98.1%
Valley Farms North		Louisville, KY	128	1	127	120	93.8%	96.9%
Montecito Apartments		Austin, TX	268	2	266	254	94.8%	98.0%
Hilliard Grand Apartments		Dublin, OH	314	1	313	302	96.2%	98.6%
The Hills at Fair Oaks		Fair Oaks Ranch, TX	288	2	286	272	94.4%	96.4%
Library Lofts East		Kansas City, MO	118	—	118	109	92.4%	95.5%
Trails at Buda Ranch		Buda, TX	264	1	263	253	95.8%	97.6%
Deep Deuce at Bricktown		Oklahoma City, OK	294	2	292	277	94.2%	99.1%
Deer Valley Apartments		Lake Bluff, IL	224	1	223	216	96.4%	98.4%
Grayson Ridge Apartment Homes		North Richland Hills, TX	240	1	239	234	97.5%	98.2%
Rosemont Olmos Park Apartments		San Antonio, TX	144	1	143	139	96.5%	98.3%
Retreat at Quail North		Oklahoma City, OK	240	1	239	225	93.8%	96.6%
Lodge at Trails Edge		Indianapolis, IN	268	1	267	260	97.0%	99.9%
Arbors of Carrolton		Carrolton, TX	131	—	131	127	96.9%	98.3%
Waterford on the Meadow		Plato, TX	350	—	350	337	96.3%	98.2%
The Belmont		Grand Prairie, TX	260	—	260	250	96.2%	98.0%



Property	Location	Total Units	Non-Revenue Units	Rentable Units	Average Occupied Units	Average % Occupied	% Leased
Multi-Family (continued)
Meritage at Steiner Ranch	Austin, TX	502	4	498	465	92.6%	96.0%
Tapestry Park Apartments	Birmingham, AL	354	1	353	325	91.8%	95.0%
Dawntree Apartments	Carrolton, TX	400	—	400	387	96.8%	97.6%
Stuart Hall Lofts	Kansas City, MO	115	—	115	110	95.7%	97.6%
Bricegrove Park Apartments	Canal Winchester, OH	240	—	240	234	97.5%	98.4%
Retreat at Hamburg Place	Lexington, KY	150	1	149	143	95.3%	97.3%
Cantare at Indian Lake Village	Hendersonville, TN	206	1	205	194	94.2%	96.4%
The Landing at Mansfield	Mansfield, TX	336	2	334	318	94.6%	96.4%
Heights at 2121	Houston, TX	504	14	490	459	91.1%	95.7%
Villas at Huffmeister	Houston, TX	294	1	293	271	92.2%	94.5%
Villas at Kingwood	Kingwood, TX	330	1	329	320	97.0%	98.4%
Waterford Place at Riata Ranch	Cypress, TX	228	1	227	212	93.0%	96.8%
Carrington Place	Houston, TX	324	1	323	305	94.1%	96.5%
Carrington at Champion Forest	Houston, TX	284	1	283	271	95.4%	98.0%
Carrington Park at Huffmeister	Cypress, TX	232	1	231	221	95.3%	97.2%
Willow Crossing Apartments	Elk Grove Village, IL	579	2	577	541	93.4%	95.2%
Echo at Katy Ranch	Katy, TX	260	1	259	225	86.5%	90.5%
Heritage Grand at Sienna Plantation	Missouri City, TX	240	1	239	222	92.5%	93.6%
Audubon Park Apartments	Nashville, TN	256	—	256	234	91.4%	94.0%
Mallard Crossing Apartments	Loveland, OH	350	2	348	333	95.1%	98.4%
Renaissance at Carol Stream	Carol Stream, IL	293	1	292	281	95.9%	97.7%
Reserve at Creekside	Chattanooga, TN	192	1	191	184	95.8%	97.8%
Mapleshade Park	Dallas, TX	148	1	147	141	95.3%	99.2%
Richland Falls	Murfreesboro, TN	190	1	189	188	98.9%	100.0%
Oak Crossing Apartments	Fort Wayne, IN	222	1	221	214	96.4%	99.8%
Park Shore Apartments	St. Charles, IL	160	—	160	155	96.9%	98.4%
Total		16,623	74	16,549	15,793	95.0%	97.4%


		Total Units	Total Square Footage	Occupied Square Footage	% Occupied
Commercial
Library Lofts Commercial	Kansas City, MO	2	16,680	12,480	74.8%
Stuart Hall Commercial	Kansas City, MO	1	4,450	4,450	100.0%
Meritage at Steiner Ranch Commercial	Austin, TX	1	4,843	—	—%
Total		4	25,973	16,930	65.2%





Monthly Portfolio Snapshot	\|	JUNE 2016

Property		Location	Total Units	Non-Revenue Units	Rentable Units	Average Occupied Units	Average % Occupied	% Leased
Multi-Family
Park Place Condominiums		Des Moines, IA	151	—	151	145	96.0%	99.7%
Clarion Park Apartments		Olathe, KS	220	1	219	207	94.1%	96.7%
Cooper Creek Village Apartments		Louisville, KY	123	—	123	118	95.9%	96.9%
Truman Farm Villas		Grandview, MO	200	1	199	194	97.0%	99.6%
EBT Lofts		Kansas City, MO	102	—	102	98	96.1%	99.0%
Windsor on the River Apartments		Cedar Rapids, IA	424	—	424	405	95.5%	97.7%
Renaissance at St. Andrews		Louisville, KY	216	—	216	205	94.9%	96.1%
Spring Creek Apartments		Edmond, OK	252	2	250	235	93.3%	96.3%
Montclair Parc Apartment Homes		Oklahoma City, OK	360	2	358	345	95.8%	98.2%
Sonoma Grande Apartments		Tulsa, OK	336	1	335	325	96.7%	98.0%
Estancia Apartments		Tulsa, OK	294	1	293	281	95.6%	97.4%
Montelena Apartments		Round Rock, TX	232	1	231	226	97.4%	99.2%
Valley Farms Apartment Homes		Louisville, KY	160	2	158	153	95.6%	98.0%
Hilliard Park Apartments		Columbus, OH	201	1	200	189	94.0%	97.0%
Sycamore Terrace Apartments		Terre Haute, IN	250	1	249	235	94.0%	99.8%
Hilliard Summit Apartments		Columbus, OH	208	1	207	196	94.2%	98.8%
Springmarc Apartments		San Marcos, TX	240	1	239	229	95.4%	99.9%
Renaissance at St. Andrews Condominiums		Louisville, KY	30	1	29	27	90.0%	97.5%
Ashley Oaks Apartment Homes		San Antonio, TX	462	2	460	443	95.9%	97.2%
Arrowhead Apartment Homes		Palatine, IL	200	1	199	193	96.5%	99.0%
The Moorings Apartments		Roselle, IL	216	1	215	206	95.4%	98.6%
Forty 57 Apartments		Lexington, KY	436	1	435	418	95.9%	97.6%
Keystone Farms Apartments		Nashville, TN	90	—	90	88	97.8%	99.2%
Riverford Crossing Apartments		Frankfort, KY	300	1	299	288	96.0%	98.8%
Valley Farms North		Louisville, KY	128	1	127	119	93.0%	95.7%
Montecito Apartments		Austin, TX	268	2	266	258	96.3%	98.9%
Hilliard Grand Apartments		Dublin, OH	314	1	313	304	96.8%	99.4%
The Hills at Fair Oaks		Fair Oaks Ranch, TX	288	2	286	272	94.4%	97.6%
Library Lofts East		Kansas City, MO	118	—	118	109	92.4%	96.4%
Trails at Buda Ranch		Buda, TX	264	1	263	254	96.2%	98.1%
Deep Deuce at Bricktown		Oklahoma City, OK	294	2	292	279	94.9%	99.7%
Deer Valley Apartments		Lake Bluff, IL	224	1	223	212	94.6%	96.9%
Grayson Ridge Apartment Homes		North Richland Hills, TX	240	1	239	231	96.3%	97.6%
Rosemont Olmos Park Apartments		San Antonio, TX	144	1	143	138	95.8%	97.4%
Retreat at Quail North		Oklahoma City, OK	240	1	239	228	95.0%	97.9%
Lodge at Trails Edge		Indianapolis, IN	268	1	267	260	97.0%	99.6%
Arbors of Carrollton		Carrollton, TX	131	—	131	127	96.9%	98.1%
Waterford on the Meadow		Plano, TX	350	—	350	342	97.7%	98.9%



Property	Location	Total Units	Non-Revenue Units	Rentable Units	Average Occupied Units	Average % Occupied	% Leased
Multi-Family (continued)
The Belmont	Grand Prairie, TX	260	—	260	253	97.3%	98.3%
Meritage at Steiner Ranch	Austin, TX	502	6	496	462	92.0%	96.4%
Tapestry Park Apartments	Birmingham, AL	354	1	353	333	94.1%	97.5%
Dawntree Apartments	Carrollton, TX	400	—	400	384	96.0%	97.4%
Stuart Hall Lofts	Kansas City, MO	115	—	115	111	96.5%	98.7%
BriceGrove Park Apartments	Canal Winchester, OH	240	—	240	230	95.8%	98.9%
Retreat at Hamburg Place	Lexington, KY	150	1	149	146	97.3%	98.5%
Cantare at Indian Lake Village	Hendersonville, TN	206	1	205	197	95.6%	98.1%
The Landing at Mansfield	Mansfield, TX	336	2	334	320	95.2%	97.0%
Heights at 2121	Houston, TX	504	14	490	461	91.5%	95.7%
Villas at Huffmeister	Houston, TX	294	1	293	275	93.5%	96.3%
Villas of Kingwood	Kingwood, TX	330	1	329	318	96.4%	97.6%
Waterford Place at Riata Ranch	Cypress, TX	228	1	227	210	92.1%	96.5%
Carrington Place	Houston, TX	324	1	323	313	96.6%	98.1%
Carrington at Champion Forest	Houston, TX	284	1	283	268	94.4%	96.4%
Carrington Park at Huffmeister	Cypress, TX	232	1	231	224	96.6%	98.3%
Willow Crossing Apartments	Elk Grove Village, IL	579	3	576	532	91.9%	95.8%
Echo at Katy Ranch	Katy, TX	260	1	259	227	87.3%	92.6%
Heritage Grand at Sienna Plantation	Missouri City, TX	240	1	239	229	95.4%	97.8%
Audubon Park Apartments	Nashville, TN	256	—	256	229	89.5%	92.8%
Mallard Crossing Apartments	Loveland, OH	350	2	348	340	97.1%	99.7%
Renaissance at Carol Stream	Carol Stream, IL	293	1	292	279	95.2%	97.7%
Reserve at Creekside	Chattanooga, TN	192	1	191	183	95.3%	99.1%
Mapleshade Park	Dallas, TX	148	1	147	145	98.0%	100.0%
Richland Falls	Murfreesboro, TN	214	1	213	186	95.4%	99.6%
Oak Crossing Apartments	Fort Wayne, IN	222	1	221	215	96.8%	99.9%
Park Shore Apartments	St. Charles, IL	160	—	160	148	92.5%	98.7%
Total		16,647	79	16,568	15,800	94.9%	97.8%


		Total Units	Total Square Footage	Occupied Square Footage	% Occupied
Commercial
Library Lofts Commercial	Kansas City, MO	2	16,680	12,480	74.8%
Stuart Hall Commercial	Kansas City, MO	1	4,450	4,450	100.0%
Meritage at Steiner Ranch Commercial	Austin, TX	1	4,843	—	—%
Total		4	25,973	16,930	65.2%

DEFINITIONS OF PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE METRICS


Total Units:	Number of units per property at the end of the reporting period.


Non-Revenue Units:	Number of model units or other non-revenue administrative units at the end of the reporting period.


Rentable Units:	Total Units less Non-Revenue Units at the end of the reporting period.


Average Occupied Units:	Number of units occupied based on a weekly average during the reporting period.


Average Percent Occupied:	Percent of units occupied (Average Occupied Units divided by Total Units).


Percent Leased:	Percent of Total Units leased at the end of the reporting period (number of leased units divided by Total Units).


Total Square Footage:	Total square footage of commercial property at the end of the reporting period.


Occupied Square Footage:	Total square footage of commercial property occupied at the end of the reporting period.


Percent Occupied:	Percent of square footage occupied (Occupied Square Footage divided by Total Square Footage).

Steadfast Income REIT, Inc. - FORM 8-K - EX-99.1 - EXHIBIT 99.1 - August 11, 2016

Attached files

Steadfast Income REIT, Inc. Reports