Attached files

file filename
8-K - CURRENT REPORT - Black Creek Diversified Property Fund Inc.dvcv-8k_111215.htm
EX-99.1 - PRESS RELEASE - Black Creek Diversified Property Fund Inc.ex99-1.htm
 

Dividend Capital Diversified Property Fund Inc. 8-K

 

Exhibit 99.2

 

 

 

 
 

 

table of Contents

PERFORMANCE 3
NET ASSET VALUE 4
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 6
PORTFOLIO PROFILE 7
BALANCE SHEETS 8
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS 9
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS 10
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 12
FINANCE & CAPITAL 14
REAL PROPERTIES 17
LEASING ACTIVITY 18
INVESTMENT ACTIVITY 21
DEFINITIONS 23

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements included in this portfolio performance and review package that are not historical facts (including any statements concerning investment objectives, other plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance or assumptions or forecasts related thereto) are forward looking statements. These statements are only predictions. We caution that forward looking statements are not guarantees. Actual events or our investments and results of operations could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are typically identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “could,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “predict,” “potential” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology.

The forward looking statements included herein are based upon our current expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions and beliefs that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to: the continuing impact of high unemployment and the slow economic recovery, which is having and may continue to have a negative effect on the following, among other things, the fundamentals of our business, including overall market demand and occupancy, tenant space utilization, and rental rates; the value of our real estate assets, which may limit our ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices or obtain or maintain debt financing secured by our properties or on an unsecured basis; general risks affecting the real estate industry (including, without limitation, the inability to enter into or renew leases, dependence on tenants’ financial condition, and competition from other developers, owners and operators of real estate); our ability to effectively raise and deploy proceeds from our equity offerings; risks associated with the availability and terms of debt and equity financing and refinancing and the use of debt to fund acquisitions and developments, including the risk associated with interest rates impacting the cost and/or availability of financing and refinancing; the business opportunities that may be presented to and pursued by us, changes in laws or regulations (including changes to laws governing the taxation of real estate investment trusts; changes in accounting principles, policies and guidelines applicable to real estate investment trusts; environmental, regulatory and/or safety requirements; and the availability and cost of comprehensive insurance, including coverage for terrorist acts and earthquakes. Except as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements after the date of this supplemental package, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason. You should review the risk factors contained in Part I, Item 1A of our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2015, and in our subsequent quarterly reports.

Please see the section titled “Definitions” at the end of this portfolio performance and review package for definitions of terms used herein.

 

 

Page | 2
 

 

PERFORMANCE

 

Dividend Capital Diversified Property Fund Inc. is a daily NAV-based REIT and has invested in a diverse portfolio of real property and real estate related investments. As used herein, “the Portfolio,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Dividend Capital Diversified Property Fund Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and partnerships except where the context otherwise requires.

Quarter Highlights

·Total return of 1.76% for the quarter; 9.84% for the last 12 months
·Acquired (i) office property in Hollywood, FL for $45.8 million and (ii) retail property in Davie, FL for $32.7 million
·Sold (i) office property in Los Angeles, CA for $12.5 million and (ii) land parcel in Denver. CO for $7.6 million
·Reported percentage leased of 88.8% as of September 30, 2015 (if weighted by the fair value of each segment, our portfolio was 91.9% leased as of September 30, 2015)
·Paid weighted-average distribution of $0.0895/share

DPF - Supplement Graphic Q3 2015 - 90%

 

 

Shareholder Returns

 

   Q3 2015  Year-to-Date  1-Year  Since Inception
(9/30/12) -
Annualized(6)
Distribution returns (3)(4)   1.22%   3.84%   5.21%   5.29%
Net change in NAV, per share(4)   0.54%   3.51%   4.63%   3.75%
Total return (4)(5)   1.76%   7.35%   9.84%   9.04%

 

DPF - Supplement Graphic Q3 2015 - 90%

 

 

Key Statistics

 

    As of September 30, 2015
Fair Value(1) of  Investments    $2,344.7 million
Number of Real Properties   59
Number of Real Property Markets   20
Total Square Feet   9.8 million
Number of Tenants   Approximately 525
Percentage Leased   88.8%
Debt to Fair Value of Investments   43%

 

____________________________________________

 

(1)As determined in accordance with our Valuation Procedures, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K. See a discussion of some of the differences between the definition of “fair value” of our real estate assets as used in our Valuation Procedures and in this document versus GAAP values in the section titled “Definitions” beginning on page 23. For a description of key assumptions used in calculating the value of our real properties as of September 30, 2015, please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I, Item 2 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
(2)In addition to the markets shown, we had real property investments, each accounting for 1% or less of the total fair value of our real property portfolio, in the following markets: Central Kentucky, Chicago, IL, Fayetteville, AR, Jacksonville, FL, Louisville, KY, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN, and San Antonio, TX.
(3)Represents the compounded return realized from reinvested distributions before class specific expenses. We pay our dealer manager (1) a dealer manager fee equal to 1/365th of 0.60% of our NAV per share for Class A shares and Class W shares for each day, (2) a dealer manager fee equal to 1/365th of 0.10% of our NAV per share for Class I shares for each day and (3) for Class A shares only, a distribution fee equal to 1/365th of 0.50% of our NAV per share for Class A shares for each day.
(4)Excludes the impact of up-front commissions paid with respect to certain Class A shares. We pay selling commissions on Class A shares sold in the primary offering of up to 3.0% of the public offering price per share, which may be higher or lower due to rounding. Selling commissions may be reduced or eliminated to or for the account of certain categories of purchasers.
(5)Total return represents the compound annual rate of return assuming reinvestment of all dividend distributions. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
(6)Q4 2012 represents the first full quarter for which we have complete NAV return data. As such, we use 9/30/12 as “inception” for the purpose of calculating cumulative returns since inception.

Page | 3
 

 

NET ASSET VALUE

The following table sets forth the components of NAV for the Portfolio as of the end of each of the five quarters ending September 30, 2015, as determined in accordance with our valuation procedures. As used below, “Fund Interests” means our Class E shares, Class A shares, Class W shares, and Class I shares, along with the OP Units held by third parties, and “Aggregate Fund NAV” means the NAV of all of the Fund Interests (amounts in thousands except per share information).

 

                
   As of
  

September 30,

2015 (1)

 

June 30,

2015 (2)

 

March 31,

2015 (3)

 

December 31,

2014 (4)

 

September 30,

2014 (5)

Real properties:                         
Office  $1,356,600   $1,308,600   $1,245,000   $1,446,850   $1,442,900 
Industrial   88,050    86,850    85,800    248,300    263,150 
Retail   872,300    835,320    833,770    786,705    745,155 
Total real properties   2,316,950    2,230,770    2,164,570    2,481,855    2,451,205 
Debt related investments   27,775    56,548    87,901    94,951    94,673 
Total investments   2,344,725    2,287,318    2,252,471    2,576,806    2,545,878 
Cash and other assets, net of other liabilities   (26,734)   (25,014)   (22,269)   (10,814)   663 
Debt obligations   (997,517)   (818,417)   (827,304)   (1,192,250)   (1,182,819)
Outside investors’ interests   (4,498)   (4,494)   (4,445)   (8,652)   (10,310)
Aggregate Fund NAV  $1,315,976   $1,439,393   $1,398,453   $1,365,090   $1,353,412 
Total Fund Interests outstanding   177,468    195,153    191,434    190,547    190,967 
NAV per Fund Interest  $7.42   $7.38   $7.31   $7.16   $7.09 

______________________________________________

 

(1)For information about the valuation procedures and key assumptions used in these calculations, please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I, Item 2 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
(2)For information about the valuation procedures and key assumptions used in these calculations, please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I, Item 2 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 12, 2015.
(3)For information about the valuation procedures and key assumptions used in these calculations, please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I, Item 2 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 12, 2015.
(4)For information about the valuation procedures and key assumptions used in these calculations, please refer to “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” in Part II, Item 5 of our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(5)For information about the valuation procedures and key assumptions used in these calculations, please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I, Item 2 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2014.

When the fair value of our real estate assets is calculated for the purposes of determining our NAV per share, the calculation is done using the fair value methodologies detailed within the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification under Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC Topic 820”). However, our valuation procedures and our NAV are not subject to GAAP and will not be subject to independent audit. In the determination of our NAV, the value of certain of our assets and liabilities are generally determined based on their carrying amounts under GAAP; however, those principles are generally based upon historic cost and therefore may not be determined in accordance with ASC Topic 820. Readers should refer to our audited financial statements for our net book value determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) from which one can derive our net book value per share by dividing our stockholders’ equity by shares of our common stock outstanding as of the date of measurement.

Our valuation procedures, which address specifically each category of our assets and liabilities and are applied separately from the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP, involve adjustments from historical cost. There are certain factors which cause NAV to be different from net book value on a GAAP basis. Most significantly, the valuation of our real estate assets, which is the largest component of our NAV calculation, will be provided to us by the Independent Valuation Firm on a daily basis. For GAAP purposes, these assets are generally recorded at depreciated or amortized cost. Other examples that will cause our NAV to differ from our GAAP net book value include the straight-lining of rent, which results in a receivable for GAAP purposes that is not included in the determination of our NAV, and, for purposes of determining our NAV, the assumption of a value of zero in certain instances where the balance of a loan exceeds the value of the underlying real estate properties, where GAAP net book value would reflect a negative equity value for such real estate properties, even if such loans are non-recourse. Third party appraisers may value our individual real estate assets using appraisal standards that deviate from market value standards under GAAP. The use of such appraisal standards may cause our NAV to deviate from GAAP fair value principles. We did not develop our valuation procedures with the intention of complying with fair value concepts under GAAP and, therefore, there could be differences between our fair values and the fair values derived from the principal market or most advantageous market concepts of establishing fair value under GAAP.

 

Page | 4
 

NET ASSET VALUE (continued)

The following table sets forth the quarterly changes to the components of NAV for the Portfolio, for each of the most recent four quarters, and for the nine month and twelve month periods ended September 30, 2015 (amounts in thousands, except per share information):

   Three Months Ended  Previous Four   Nine Months Ended
   September 30, 2015  June 30, 2015  March 31, 2015  December 31, 2014  Quarters  September 30, 2015
                   
NAV as of beginning of period  $1,439,393   $1,398,453   $1,365,090   $1,353,412   $1,353,412   $1,365,090 
Fund level changes to NAV                              
    Realized/unrealized gains (losses) on net assets   5,149    12,168    22,540    11,515    51,372    39,857 
 Income accrual   23,391    24,237    26,217    24,269    98,114    73,845 
 Dividend accrual   (16,747)   (17,584)   (17,197)   (16,751)   (68,279)   (51,528)
   Advisory fee   (3,847)   (4,143)   (3,931)   (3,967)   (15,888)   (11,921)
   Performance based fee   (364)   (342)   (352)   (204)   (1,262)   (1,058)
Class specific changes to NAV                               
   Dealer Manager fee   (71)   (59)   (49)   (46)   (225)   (179)
   Distribution fee   (13)   (12)   (11)   (10)   (46)   (36)
   NAV as of end of period                              
      before share sale/redemption activity  $1,446,891   $1,412,718   $1,392,307   $1,368,218   $1,417,198   $1,414,070 
Share sale/redemption activity                              
        Shares sold   12,201    64,745    18,665    14,097    109,708    95,611 
        Shares redeemed   (143,116)   (38,070)   (12,519)   (17,225)   (210,930)   (193,705)
NAV as of end of period  $1,315,976   $1,439,393   $1,398,453   $1,365,090   $1,315,976   $1,315,976 
Shares outstanding beginning of period   195,153    191,434    190,547    190,967    190,967    190,547 
     Shares sold   1,650    8,883    2,603    1,986    15,122    13,136 
     Shares redeemed   (19,335)   (5,164)   (1,716)   (2,406)   (28,621)   (26,215)
Shares outstanding end of period   177,468    195,153    191,434    190,547    177,468    177,468 
NAV per share as of beginning of period  $7.38   $7.31   $7.16   $7.09   $7.09   $7.16 
     Change in NAV per share   0.04    0.07    0.15    0.07    0.33    0.26 
NAV per share as of end of period  $7.42   $7.38   $7.31   $7.16   $7.42   $7.42 

We include no discounts to our NAV for the illiquid nature of our shares, including the limitations on your ability to redeem shares under our share redemption programs and our ability to suspend or terminate our share redemption programs at any time. Our NAV generally does not consider exit costs (e.g. selling costs and commissions related to the sale of a property) that would likely be incurred if our assets and liabilities were liquidated or sold. While we may use market pricing concepts to value individual components of our NAV, our per share NAV is not derived from the market pricing information of open-end real estate funds listed on stock exchanges.

Please note that our NAV is not a representation, warranty or guarantee that: (1) we would fully realize our NAV upon a sale of our assets; (2) shares of our common stock would trade at our per share NAV on a national securities exchange; or (3) a stockholder would be able to realize the per share NAV if such stockholder attempted to sell his or her shares to a third party.

Page | 5
 

 

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Amounts in thousands, except per share information and percentages.

 

 

   As of or For the Three Months Ended  As of or For the Nine Months Ended
Selected Operating Data  (as adjusted) (1) 

September 30,

2015

 

June 30,

2015

 

March 31,

2015

 

December 31,

2014

 

September 30,
2014

 

September 30,

2015

 

September 30,
2014

Total revenues  $53,661   $52,659   $62,582   $59,093   $58,591   $168,902   $173,473 
Net (loss) income   (1,425)   107    132,201    5,700    (7,514)   130,883    28,292 
Portfolio Statistics                                   
Operating properties   59    58    58    68    69    59    69 
Square feet   9,763    9,493    9,327    11,871    12,000    9,763    12,000 
Percentage leased at end of period   88.8%   87.5%   89.5%   93.7%   92.8%   88.8%   92.8%
Earnings Per Share                                   
Net (loss) income per share  $(0.00)  $0.00   $0.69   $0.03   $(0.04)  $0.69   $0.13 
Funds from Operations (“FFO”) per share (2)  $0.11   $0.10   $0.13   $0.12   $0.12   $0.35   $0.36 
Company-defined FFO per share (2)  $0.12   $0.10   $0.14   $0.12   $0.13   $0.36   $0.36 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic   174,290    183,157    179,317    179,926    178,729    179,168    177,717 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted   187,279    196,267    191,766    192,137    191,422    192,020    190,605 
Net Asset Value (“NAV”) (3)                                   
NAV per share at the end of period  $7.42   $7.38   $7.31   $7.16   $7.09   $7.42   $7.09 
High NAV per share during period  $7.44   $7.38   $7.31   $7.19   $7.09   $7.44   $7.00 
Low NAV per share during period  $7.36   $7.28   $7.13   $7.08   $7.00   $7.13   $6.93 
Weighted average distributions per share  $0.0895   $0.0896   $0.0897   $0.0872   $0.0872   $0.2688   $0.2620 
Weighted average closing dividend yield - annualized   4.83%   4.86%   4.91%   4.87%   4.92%   4.83%   4.93%
Weighted average total return for the period   1.75%   2.19%   3.23%   2.31%   2.53%   7.33%   6.11%
Aggregate fund NAV at end of period  $1,315,976   $1,439,393   $1,398,453   $1,365,090   $1,353,412   $1,315,976   $1,353,412 
Consolidated Debt                                   
Leverage (4)   43%   36%   37%   47%   47%   43%   47%
Secured borrowings  $543,947   $574,043   $652,127   $853,267   $871,230   $543,947   $871,230 
Secured borrowings as % of total borrowings   54%   70%   78%   71%   73%   54%   73%
Unsecured borrowings  $459,000   $250,000   $181,000   $345,000   $317,500   $459,000   $317,500 
Unsecured borrowings as % of total borrowings   46%   30%   22%   29%   27%   46%   27%
Fixed rate borrowings (5)  $919,633   $815,973   $824,967   $1,145,017   $1,062,890   $919,633   $1,062,890 
Fixed rate borrowings as % of total borrowings   92%   99%   99%   96%   89%   92%   89%
Floating rate borrowings  $83,314   $8,070   $8,160   $53,250   $125,840   $83,314   $125,840 
Floating rate borrowings as % of total borrowings   8%   1%   1%   4%   11%   8%   11%
Total borrowings  $1,002,947   $824,043   $833,127   $1,198,267   $1,188,730   $1,002,947   $1,188,730 

_____________________________________________

 

(1)Operating data in this table and throughout this document are presented inclusive of amounts relating to real properties that have been disposed of or classified as held for sale at the end of the period, and in certain cases, reclassified as discontinued operations in our GAAP financial statements. Certain asset and liability amounts in this table and throughout this document are presented inclusive of amounts relating to real properties that have been classified as held for sale in our GAAP financial statements.
(2)For a reconciliation of FFO and Company-Defined FFO to GAAP net income, see the section titled “Funds from Operations” beginning on page 10.
(3)As determined in accordance with our Valuation Procedures, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K. See a discussion of some of the differences between the definition of “fair value” of our real estate assets as used in our Valuation Procedures and in this document versus GAAP values in the section titled “Definitions” beginning on page 23. For a description of key assumptions used in calculating the value of our real properties as of September 30, 2015, please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I, Item 2 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
(4)Leverage presented represents our total borrowings, calculated on a GAAP basis, divided by the fair value of our real property and debt investments.
(5)Fixed rate borrowings presented includes floating rate borrowings that are effectively fixed by a derivative instrument such as a swap through maturity or substantially through maturity.

Page | 6
 

 

PORTFOLIO PROFILE

The following table presents information about the operating results and fair value of our real property and debt investment portfolios as of or for the three months ended September 30, 2015 (dollar and square footage amount in thousands).

 

   Real Properties (1)      
As of or for the three months ended September 30, 2015  Total  Office  Industrial  Retail  Debt Related
Investments, Net
  Grand Total
Number of investments   59    20    6    33    5    64 
Square footage   9,763    4,404    1,909    3,450    N/A    9,763 
Percentage leased at period end   88.8%   91.3%   72.2%   94.8%   N/A    88.8%
Net operating income (“NOI”)(2)  $37,977   $23,937   $885   $13,155   $807   $38,784 
Segment as % of total NOI   97.9%   61.7%   2.3%   33.9%   2.1%   100.0%
NOI - cash basis (3)  $38,139   $24,721   $865   $12,553   $807   $38,946 
Fair Value (4)  $2,316,950   $1,356,600   $88,050   $872,300   $27,775   $2,344,725 
Segment as % of total Fair Value   98.8%   57.9%   3.7%   37.2%   1.2%   100.0%

__________________________________________

 

(1)“As of” information includes all real properties that we owned as of September 30, 2015. Operations information provided here and throughout this document is presented inclusive of amounts related to properties that have been disposed of as of September 30, 2015, including amounts that are classified within discontinued operations in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
(2)For a reconciliation of NOI to GAAP net income, see the section titled “Results of Operations” beginning on page 12.
(3)For a reconciliation of NOI – Cash Basis to NOI and to GAAP net income, see the section titled “Results of Operations” beginning on page 12.
(4)As determined in accordance with our Valuation Procedures, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K. See a discussion of some of the differences between the definition of “fair value” of our real estate assets as used in our Valuation Procedures and in this document versus GAAP values in the section titled “Definitions” beginning on page 23. For a description of key assumptions used in calculating the value of our real properties as of September 30, 2015, please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I, Item 2 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

As of September 30, 2015, our real property investments were geographically diversified across 20 markets throughout the United States. Our debt related investments are located in three additional markets resulting in a combined portfolio allocation across 23 markets.

Page | 7
 

 

BALANCE SHEETS

The following table presents our consolidated balance sheets, as adjusted, as of the end of each of the five quarters ended September 30, 2015. Certain asset and liability amounts in this table are presented inclusive of amounts relating to real properties that have been classified as held for sale in our GAAP financial statements (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

   As of
  

September 30,

2015

 

June 30,

2015

 

March 31,

2015

 

December 31,

2014

 

September 30,
2014

ASSETS               
Investments in real property  $2,270,746   $2,199,150   $2,139,022   $2,472,926   $2,450,058 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization   (489,395)   (473,526)   (455,064)   (523,246)   (512,427)
Total net investments in real property   1,781,351    1,725,624    1,683,958    1,949,680    1,937,631 
Debt related investments, net   27,775    56,548    87,901    94,951    94,673 
Total net investments   1,809,126    1,782,172    1,771,859    2,044,631    2,032,304 
Cash and cash equivalents   15,186    28,919    10,226    14,461    27,814 
Restricted cash   20,258    19,026    18,564    27,454    25,784 
Other assets, net   46,250    47,223    49,877    61,587    62,271 
              Total Assets  $1,890,820   $1,877,340   $1,850,526   $2,148,133   $2,148,173 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY                         
Liabilities:                         
Mortgage notes and other secured borrowings  $543,947   $574,043   $652,127   $853,267   $871,230 
Unsecured borrowings   459,000    250,000    181,000    345,000    317,500 
Intangible lease liabilities, net   58,649    54,994    54,937    86,243    78,545 
Other liabilities   84,129    99,460    70,744    99,643    101,657 
   Total Liabilities   1,145,725    978,497    958,808    1,384,153    1,368,932 
Equity:                         
Stockholders’ equity:                         
Common stock   1,650    1,821    1,783    1,784    1,787 
Additional paid-in capital   1,479,403    1,607,115    1,584,780    1,586,444    1,589,520 
Distributions in excess of earnings   (818,531)   (802,620)   (786,286)   (893,791)   (883,418)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (14,985)   (9,405)   (11,808)   (10,120)   (9,515)
Total stockholders’ equity   647,537    796,911    788,469    684,317    698,374 
Noncontrolling interests   97,558    101,932    103,249    79,663    80,867 
       Total Equity   745,095    898,843    891,718    763,980    779,241 
                  Total Liabilities and Equity  $1,890,820   $1,877,340   $1,850,526   $2,148,133   $2,148,173 

 

Page | 8
 

 

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table presents our condensed consolidated statements of operations, as adjusted, for each of the five quarters ended September 30, 2015 and the nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. Operating data in this table are presented inclusive of amounts relating to real properties that have been reclassified as discontinued operations in our GAAP financial statements (amounts in thousands, except per share data):

 

   Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
  

September 30,

2015

 

June 30,

2015

 

March 31,

2015

 

December 31,

2014

 

September 30,
2014

 

September 30,

2015

 

September 30,
2014

REVENUE:                     
Rental revenue  $52,854   $51,075   $59,379   $57,268   $56,793   $163,308   $167,902 
Debt related income   807    1,584    3,203    1,825    1,798    5,594    5,571 
    Total Revenue   53,661    52,659    62,582    59,093    58,591    168,902    173,473 
EXPENSES:                                   
Rental expense   14,877    13,407    15,129    13,050    12,804    43,412    38,288 
Real estate depreciation and amortization expense   20,851    19,738    20,815    22,514    21,918    61,404    66,481 
General and administrative expenses   2,477    2,944    2,735    2,922    2,581    8,157    8,186 
Advisory fees, related party   4,225    4,497    4,299    4,242    4,083    13,021    11,678 
Acquisition-related expenses   476    358    425    243    372    1,259    962 
Impairment of real estate property   6,500    224    1,400    —      9,500    8,124    9,500 
    Total Operating Expenses   49,406    41,168    44,803    42,971    51,258    135,377    135,095 
Other Income (Expenses):                                   
Interest and other income (expense)   704    163    632    480    429    1,500    683 
Interest expense   (10,951)   (11,275)   (13,981)   (15,354)   (15,276)   (36,208)   (46,846)
Loss on extinguishment of debt and financing commitments   —      (272)   (896)   —      —      (1,168)   (63)
Gain on sale of real property   4,567    —      128,667    4,452    —      133,234    36,140 
Net (Loss) Income   (1,425)   107    132,201    5,700    (7,514)   130,883    28,292 
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests   1,297    (37)   (8,618)   (397)   475    (7,358)   (4,405)
NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS  $(128)  $70   $123,583   $5,303   $(7,039)  $123,525   $23,887 
NET (LOSS) INCOME PER BASIC AND DILUTED COMMON SHARE  $(0.00)  $0.00   $0.69   $0.03   $(0.04)  $0.69   $0.13 

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES

OUTSTANDING

                                   
Basic   174,290    183,157    179,317    179,926    178,729    179,168    177,717 
Diluted   187,279    196,267    191,766    192,137    191,422    192,020    190,605 
Weighted average distributions declared per common share  $0.0895   $0.0896   $0.0897   $0.0872   $0.0872   $0.2688   $0.2620 

 

Page | 9
 

 

FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS

The following tables present NAREIT-Defined Funds From Operations (“FFO”) and Company-defined FFO for each of the five quarters ended September 30, 2015 and the nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. Operating data in these tables are presented inclusive of amounts relating to real properties that have been reclassified as discontinued operations in our GAAP financial statements (amounts in thousands except for per share amounts and percentages):

 

   Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
  

September 30,

2015

 

June 30,

2015

 

March 31,

2015

 

December 31,

2014

 

September 30,
2014

 

September 30,

2015

 

September 30,
2014

Reconciliation of net earnings to FFO:                     
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders  $(128)  $70   $123,583   $5,303   $(7,039)  $123,525   $23,887 
Add (deduct) NAREIT- defined adjustments:                                   
Depreciation and amortization expense   20,851    19,738    20,815    22,514    21,918    61,404    66,481 
Gain on disposition of real property   (4,567)   —      (128,667)   (4,452)   —      (133,234)   (36,140)
Impairment of real property   6,500    224    1,400    —      9,500    8,124    9,500 
Noncontrolling interests’ share of adjustments   (2,891)   (1,435)   6,810    (1,251)   (2,187)   2,484    (597)
FFO attributable to common shares - basic   19,765    18,597    23,941    22,114    22,192    62,303    63,131 
FFO attributable to dilutive OP units   1,473    1,331    1,662    1,501    1,576    4,466    4,575 
FFO attributable to common shares - diluted  $21,238   $19,928   $25,603   $23,615   $23,768   $66,769   $67,706 
FFO per share - basic and diluted  $0.11   $0.10   $0.13   $0.12   $0.12   $0.35   $0.36 
FFO payout ratio   79%   88%   67%   71%   70%   77%   74%
                                    
Reconciliation of FFO to Company - Defined FFO:                                   
FFO attributable to common shares - basic  $19,765   $18,597   $23,941   $22,114   $22,192   $62,303   $63,131 
Add (deduct) our adjustments:                                   
Acquisition-related expenses   476    358    425    243    372    1,259    962 
Loss on extinguishment of debt and financing commitments   —      272    896    —      —      1,168    63 
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives   117    (128)   11    —      —      —      —   
Noncontrolling interests’ share of our adjustments   (41)   (34)   (86)   (16)   (24)   (161)   (68)
Company-Defined FFO attributable to common shares - basic   20,317    19,065    25,187    22,341    22,540    64,569    64,088 
Company-Defined FFO attributable to dilutive OP units   1,514    1,365    1,748    1,516    1,601    4,628    4,644 
Company-Defined FFO attributable to common shares - diluted  $21,831   $20,430   $26,935   $23,857   $24,141   $69,197   $68,732 
Company-Defined FFO per share - basic and diluted  $0.12   $0.10   $0.14   $0.12   $0.13   $0.36   $0.36 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding                                   
Basic   174,290    183,157    179,317    179,926    178,729    179,168    177,717 
Diluted   187,279    196,267    191,766    192,137    191,422    192,020    190,605 

 

Page | 10
 

 

FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (continued)

The following table presents certain other supplemental information for each of the five quarters ended September 30, 2015 and the nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (amounts in thousands):

 

   Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
  

September 30,

2015

 

June 30,

2015

 

March 31,

2015

 

December 31,

2014

 

September 30,
2014

 

September 30,

2015

 

September 30,
2014

Other Supplemental Information                     
Capital Expenditures Summary                     
Recurring capital expenditures (1)  $2,476   $3,871   $2,795   $4,084   $2,513   $9,142   $8,392 
Non-recurring capital expenditures (2)   311    255    261    818    284    827    1,895 
Total Capital Expenditures   2,787    4,126    3,056    4,902    2,797    9,969    10,287 
Other non-cash adjustments                                   
Straight-line rent decrease (increase) to rental revenue   286    43    356    (98)   (1,150)   685    (2,939)
Amortization of above- and below-market rent (increase) decrease to rental revenue   (130)   (133)   (353)   (537)   (124)   (616)   (80)
Amortization of loan costs and hedges - increase to interest expense   996    1,021    1,101    1,240    1,205    3,118    3,605 
Amortization of mark-to-market adjustments on borrowings - (decrease) increase to interest expense   (463)   (268)   (265)   (262)   (276)   (996)   (459)
Total other non-cash adjustments  $689   $663   $839   $343   $(345)  $2,191   $127 

__________________________________________

 

(1)Recurring capital expenditures include lease incentives. Unlike other capital expenditures, we record lease incentives as other assets in our balance sheet and we classify payments for lease incentives as cash used in operating activities in our statement of cash flows.
(2)Amounts presented as non-recurring capital expenditures for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 exclude a payment of $12.0 million to terminate a purchase option previously held by a third party related to an office property in Northern New Jersey. We accounted for the payment as an investment in real property.
Page | 11
 

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following tables present revenue and net operating income (“NOI”) of our four operating segments, as adjusted, for each of the five quarters ending September 30, 2015 and the nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. Our same store portfolio includes all operating properties owned for the entirety of all periods presented, and includes 51 properties acquired prior to January 1, 2014, and owned through September 30, 2015, comprising approximately 8.2 million square feet (amounts in thousands):

 

   Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
Revenue:  

September 30,

2015

 

June 30,

2015

 

March 31,

2015

 

December 31,

2014

 

September 30,
2014

 

September 30,

2015

 

September 30,
2014

Same store real property:                     
Office  $27,766   $27,895   $28,633   $27,880   $28,519   $84,293   $84,626 
Industrial   1,424    1,438    1,628    1,614    1,576    4,490    5,015 
Retail   14,317    14,263    17,049    14,224    14,317    45,630    43,107 
Total same store real property revenue   43,507    43,596    47,310    43,718    44,412    134,413    132,748 
2014/2015 Acquisitions/Dispositions   9,347    7,479    12,069    13,550    12,381    28,895    35,154 
Debt related investments   807    1,584    3,203    1,825    1,798    5,594    5,571 
Total  $53,661   $52,659   $62,582   $59,093   $58,591   $168,902   $173,473 
NOI:                                    
Same store real property:                                   
Office  $19,859   $20,515   $21,086   $20,484   $20,764   $61,460   $61,553 
Industrial   951    1,019    1,111    1,242    1,182    3,081    3,627 
Retail   11,084    11,210    12,275    11,190    11,363    34,568    33,923 
Total same store real property NOI   31,894    32,744    34,472    32,916    33,309    99,109    99,103 
2014/2015 Acquisitions/Dispositions   6,083    4,924    9,778    11,302    10,680    20,787    30,511 
Debt related investments   807    1,584    3,203    1,825    1,798    5,594    5,571 
Total  $38,784   $39,252   $47,453   $46,043   $45,787   $125,490   $135,185 
NOI - cash basis:                                    
Same store real property:                                   
Office  $21,430   $21,846   $22,397   $21,484   $21,253   $65,673   $63,008 
Industrial   931    981    1,041    1,172    847    2,953    3,209 
Retail   10,737    10,864    11,861    10,714    10,879    33,461    32,343 
Total same store real property NOI - cash basis   33,098    33,691    35,299    33,370    32,979    102,087    98,560 
2014/2015 Acquisitions/Dispositions   5,041    3,894    8,902    10,152    9,669    17,839    27,814 
Debt related investments   807    1,584    3,203    1,825    1,798    5,594    5,571 
Total  $38,946   $39,169   $47,404   $45,347   $44,446   $125,520   $131,945 

 

 

Page | 12
 

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

The following tables present a reconciliation of NOI – Cash Basis and NOI of our four operating segments, as adjusted, to GAAP net income attributable to common stockholders for each of the five quarters ending September 30, 2015 and the nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (amounts in thousands):

 

   Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
   September 30,
2015
  June 30,
2015
  March 31,
2015
  December 31,
2014
 

September 30,
2014

  September 30,
2015
 

September 30,
2014

NOI - cash basis  $38,946   $39,169   $47,404   $45,347   $44,446   $125,520   $131,945 
Straight line rent   (286)   (43)   (356)   98    1,150    (685)   2,939 
Net amortization of above- and below-market lease assets and liabilities, and other non-cash adjustments to rental revenue   124    126    405    598    191    655    301 
NOI  $38,784   $39,252   $47,453   $46,043   $45,787   $125,490   $135,185 
Real estate depreciation and amortization expense   (20,851)   (19,738)   (20,815)   (22,514)   (21,918)   (61,404)   (66,481)
General and administrative expenses   (2,477)   (2,944)   (2,735)   (2,922)   (2,581)   (8,157)   (8,186)
Advisory fees, related party   (4,225)   (4,497)   (4,299)   (4,242)   (4,083)   (13,021)   (11,678)
Acquisition-related expenses   (476)   (358)   (425)   (243)   (372)   (1,259)   (962)
Impairment of real estate property   (6,500)   (224)   (1,400)   —      (9,500)   (8,124)   (9,500)
Interest and other income   704    163    632    480    429    1,500    683 
Interest expense   (10,951)   (11,275)   (13,981)   (15,354)   (15,276)   (36,208)   (46,846)
Loss on extinguishment of debt and financing commitments   —      (272)   (896)   —      —      (1,168)   (63)
Gain on sale of real property   4,567    —      128,667    4,452    —      133,234    36,140 
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests   1,297    (37)   (8,618)   (397)   475    (7,358)   (4,405)
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders  $(128)  $70   $123,583   $5,303   $(7,039)  $123,525   $23,887 

The following tables present details regarding our capital expenditures for each of the five quarters ending September 30, 2015 and the nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (amounts in thousands):

   Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
Recurring Capital Expenditures: 

September 30,

2015

 

June 30,

2015

 

March 31,

2015

 

December 31,

2014

 

September 30,
2014

 

September 30,

2015

 

September 30,
2014

Land and building improvements  $1,035   $1,850   $848   $1,626   $311   $3,733   $1,913 
Tenant improvements   607    1,503    1,500    1,250    1,045    3,610    3,221 
Leasing costs (1)   834    518    447    1,208    1,157    1,799    3,258 
Total recurring capital expenditures  $2,476   $3,871   $2,795   $4,084   $2,513   $9,142   $8,392 
Non-recurring Capital Expenditures:                                   
Land and building improvements (2)  $50   $29   $15   $93   $94   $94   $135 
Tenant improvements   219    42    205    618    149    466    1,271 
Leasing costs   42    184    41    107    41    267    489 
Total non-recurring capital expenditures  $311   $255   $261   $818   $284   $827   $1,895 

__________________________________________

 

(1)Recurring leasing costs include lease incentives. Unlike other capital expenditures, we record lease incentives as other assets in our balance sheet and we classify payments for lease incentives as cash used in operating activities in our statement of cash flows.
(2)Amounts presented as non-recurring capital expenditures for land and building improvements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 exclude a payment of $12.0 million to terminate a purchase option previously held by a third party related to an office property in Northern New Jersey. We accounted for the payment as an investment in real property.
   
Page | 13
 

FINANCE & CAPITAL

The following table describes certain information about our capital structure. Amounts reported as financing capital and our joint venture partners’ interests are presented on a GAAP basis. Amounts reported as equity capital other than our joint venture partners’ interests are presented based on the NAV as of September 30, 2015 (shares and dollar amounts other than price per share / unit in thousands).

 

FINANCING:              As of September 30, 2015
Mortgage notes                   $              543,947
Unsecured borrowings                     459,000
Total Financing                        $  1,002,947
                       
EQUITY: Shares / Units  Percentage of Aggregate Shares and Units Outstanding    NAV Per Share / Unit  Value
Class E Common Stock   139,437    78.6%    $7.42   $       1,034,058
Class A Common Stock   1,448    0.8%     7.42     10,735
Class W Common Stock   1,418    0.8%     7.42     10,513
Class I Common Stock (1)   22,299    12.6%     7.42     165,291
Class E OP Units   12,866    7.2%     7.42     95,379
Total/Weighted Average   177,468    100.0%    $7.42   $  1,315,976
Joint venture partners’ noncontrolling interests                     1,626
Total Equity                      1,317,602
TOTAL CAPITALIZATION                   $  2,320,549

________________________

(1)Amounts reported do not include approximately 441,000 restricted stock units granted to the Advisor that remain unvested as of September 30, 2015.

 

Page | 14
 

 

FINANCE & CAPITAL (continued)

The following table presents a summary of our borrowings as of September 30, 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

   Weighted Average Stated
Interest Rate
  Outstanding Balance  Gross Investment Amount
Securing Borrowings (1)
Fixed rate mortgages  5.9%  $535,967   $1,026,446 
Floating rate mortgages  3.2%   7,980    16,459 
Total secured borrowings  5.8%   543,947    1,042,905 
Line of credit (2)  2.0%   109,000    N/A 
Term loans (2)  2.6%   350,000    N/A 
Total unsecured borrowings  2.4%   459,000    N/A 
Total borrowings  4.3%  $1,002,947    N/A 

___________________________________

(1)“Gross Investment Amount” as used here and throughout this document represents the allocated gross basis of real property, calculated in accordance with GAAP, inclusive of the effect of gross intangible lease liabilities totaling approximately $87.2 million and before accumulated depreciation and amortization of approximately $489.4 million as of September 30, 2015.
(2)Approximately $383.7 million of our unsecured floating rate borrowings are effectively fixed by the use of fixed-for-floating rate swap instruments as of September 30, 2015. The stated interest rate disclosed above includes the impact of these swaps.

The following table presents a summary of our covenants and our actual results for each of the five quarters ended September 30, 2015, calculated in accordance with the terms of our amended and restated $550 million senior unsecured term loan and revolving line of credit, which we closed on January 13, 2015.

 

      Actual as of:
Portfolio-Level Covenants:  Covenant 

September 30,

2015

 

June 30,

2015

 

March 31,

2015

 

December 31,

2014

 

September 30,
2014

Leverage  <60%   42.2%   35.1%   36.2%   43.9%   42.8%
Fixed Charge Coverage  >1.50   2.5    2.4    2.3    2.1    2.2 
Secured Indebtedness  <55%   22.9%   24.4%   28.3%   31.2%   31.3%
                             
Unencumbered Pool Covenants:                            
Unsecured Interest Coverage  >2.0   9.3    9.4    8.4    9.4    9.9 
Leverage  <60%   35.5%   21.6%   17.8%   38.8%   35.9%

 

Page | 15
 

 

FINANCE & CAPITAL (continued)

The following table presents a detailed analysis of our borrowings outstanding as of September 30, 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands).

 

   As of September 30, 2015
Borrowings  Principal Balance  Secured / Unsecured  Maturity Date  Extension Options  % of Total Borrowings  Fixed or Floating Interest Rate  Current Interest Rate
Abington (1)  $4,681   Secured  1/1/2016  None  0.5%  Fixed  6.75%
Hyannis (1)   4,635   Secured  1/1/2016  None  0.5%  Fixed  6.75%
40 Boulevard   7,980   Secured  1/24/2016  None  0.8%  Floating  3.19%
DeGuigne (1)   6,871   Secured  2/1/2016  None  0.7%  Fixed  7.78%
Washington Commons   21,300   Secured  2/1/2016  None  2.0%  Fixed  5.94%
1300 Connecticut   33,719   Secured  4/10/2016  None  3.4%  Fixed  7.25%
1300 Connecticut B Note   11,505   Secured  4/10/2016  None  1.1%  Fixed  5.53%
Riverport Industrial Portfolio (1)   8,052   Secured  4/1/2016  None  0.8%  Fixed  7.38%
655 Montgomery   56,359   Secured  6/11/2016  None  5.6%  Fixed  6.01%
Jay Street   23,500   Secured  7/11/2016  None  2.3%  Fixed  6.05%
Bala Pointe   24,000   Secured  9/1/2016  None  2.4%  Fixed  5.89%
Harborside   108,188   Secured  12/10/2016  2 - 1 Year  10.8%  Fixed  5.50%
Total 2016   310,790            30.9%     5.96%
Shiloh Road   22,700   Secured  1/8/2017  None  2.3%  Fixed  5.57%
Bandera Road   21,500   Secured  2/8/2017  None  2.1%  Fixed  5.46%
Eastern Retail Portfolio   110,000   Secured  6/11/2017  None  11.0%  Fixed  5.51%
Wareham   24,400   Secured  8/8/2017  None  2.4%  Fixed  6.13%
Kingston   10,574   Secured  11/1/2017  None  1.1%  Fixed  6.33%
Sandwich   15,825   Secured  11/1/2017  None  1.6%  Fixed  6.33%
Total 2017   204,999            20.5%     5.69%
Bank of America Term Loan   150,000   Unsecured  1/31/2018  2 - 1 Year  14.9%  Floating (2)  1.91%
Line of Credit   109,000   Unsecured  1/31/2019  1 - 1 Year  10.9%  Floating (2)  1.99%
Shenandoah   10,909   Secured  9/1/2021  None  1.1%  Fixed  4.84%
Wells Fargo Term Loan   200,000   Unsecured  2/27/2022  None  19.9%  Floating (2)  3.07%
Norwell   5,129   Secured  10/1/2022  None  0.5%  Fixed  6.76%
Harwich   5,410   Secured  9/1/2028  None  0.5%  Fixed  5.24%
New Bedford   7,667   Secured  12/1/2029  None  0.8%  Fixed  5.91%
Total 2018 - 2029   488,115            48.6%     2.62%
Total borrowings   1,003,904            100.0%     4.28%
Add: mark-to-market adjustment on assumed debt   1,913                   
Less: GAAP principal amortization on restructured debt   (2,870)                  
Total Borrowings (GAAP basis)  $1,002,947                   

___________________________________

(1)Subsequent to September 30, 2015, we repaid all amounts due on our Abington, Hyannis, DeGuigne, and Riverport Industrial Portfolio mortgage notes using proceeds from our line of credit.
(2)Approximately $383.7 million of our term loan and line of credit borrowings are effectively fixed by the use of fixed-for-floating rate swap instruments as of September 30, 2015. The stated interest rates disclosed above include the impact of these swaps.
Page | 16
 

REAL PROPERTIES

The following table describes our operating property portfolio as of September 30, 2015 (dollar and square feet amounts in thousands):

 

Market  Number of Properties  Gross Investment Amount  % of Gross Investment Amount  Net Rentable Square Feet  % of Total Net Rentable Square Feet  % Leased (1)  Secured
Indebtedness (2)
Office Properties:                     
Washington, DC  3  $282,800    12.4%   878    9.0%   78.4%  $45,224 
Northern New Jersey  1   224,320    9.9%   594    6.1%   100.0%   108,188 
Austin, TX  3   152,544    6.7%   585    6.0%   98.2%   —   
East Bay, CA  1   145,290    6.4%   405    4.1%   100.0%   —   
San Francisco, CA  1   120,024    5.3%   264    2.7%   91.6%   56,359 
Denver, CO  1   81,387    3.6%   257    2.6%   92.5%   —   
Silicon Valley, CA  2   62,760    2.8%   196    2.0%   94.0%   30,371 
Princeton, NJ  1   51,233    2.3%   167    1.7%   100.0%   —   
South Florida  1   45,981    2.0%   253    2.6%   94.4%   —   
Chicago, IL  2   43,337    1.9%   307    3.1%   75.7%   29,280 
Philadelphia, PA  1   42,591    1.9%   173    1.8%   83.0%   24,000 
Dallas, TX  1   35,771    1.6%   155    1.6%   91.1%   —   
Minneapolis/St Paul, MN  1   29,514    1.3%   107    1.1%   100.0%   —   
Fayetteville, AR  1   11,695    0.5%   63    0.6%   100.0%   —   
Total/Weighted Average Office: 20 properties, 14 markets with average annual rent of $29.10 per sq. ft.   20   1,329,247    58.6%   4,404    45.0%   91.3%   293,422 
                                  
Industrial Properties:                                 
Dallas, TX  1   35,746    1.6%   446    4.6%   35.1%   22,700 
Central Kentucky  1   28,296    1.2%   727    7.4%   100.0%   —   
Louisville, KY  4   27,119    1.2%   736    7.5%   67.1%   8,052 
Total/Weighted Average Industrial: six properties, three markets with average annual rent of $3.53 per sq. ft.   6   91,161    4.0%   1,909    19.5%   72.2%   30,752 
                                  
Retail Properties:                                 
Greater Boston  27   547,750    24.0%   2,291    23.6%   93.7%   94,321 
Philadelphia, PA  1   105,100    4.6%   426    4.4%   99.1%   67,800 
Washington, DC  1   62,515    2.8%   233    2.4%   98.4%   —   
Raleigh, NC  1   45,509    2.0%   142    1.5%   100.0%   26,200 
South Florida  1   37,898    1.7%   124    1.3%   100.0%   10,909 
San Antonio, TX  1   32,072    1.4%   161    1.6%   98.3%   21,500 
Jacksonville, FL  1   19,494    0.9%   73    0.7%   65.9%   —   
Total/Weighted Average Retail: 33 properties, seven markets with average annual rent of $16.77 per sq. ft.   33   850,338    37.4%   3,450    35.5%   94.8%   220,730 
Grand Total/Weighted Average  59  $2,270,746    100.0%   9,763    100.0%   88.8%  $544,904 

___________________________________

(1)Based on executed leases as of September 30, 2015. If weighted by the fair value of each segment, our portfolio was 91.9% leased as of September 30, 2015.
(2)Secured indebtedness represents the principal balance outstanding and does not include our mark-to-market adjustment on debt or GAAP principal amortization on our troubled debt restructuring.
Page | 17
 

LEASING ACTIVITY

The following graphs highlight our total portfolio and same store portfolio percentage leased at the end of each of the five quarters ended September 30, 2015, by segment and in total:

 

Page | 18
 

LEASING ACTIVITY (continued)

As of September 30, 2015, the weighted average remaining term of our leases was approximately 6.8 years, based on contractual remaining base rent, 4.2 years, based on annualized base rent, and 4.5 years, based on square footage. The following table presents our lease expirations, by segment and in total, as of September 30, 2015 (dollars and square feet in thousands):

 

     Total  Office  Industrial  Retail
Year    Number of Leases Expiring  Annualized Base Rent  % of Total Annualized Base Rent  Square Feet  Number of Leases Expiring  Annualized Base Rent  Square Feet  Number of Leases Expiring  Annualized Base Rent  Square Feet  Number of Leases Expiring  Annualized Base Rent  Square Feet
2015 (1)     44   $1,996    1.2%   132    24   $1,281    52       $—      —      20   $715    80 
2016     80    20,715    11.7%   821    53    19,171    720        —      —      27    1,544    101 
2017     82    42,434    24.0%   1,376    44    38,163    1,010    2    189    53    36    4,082    313 
2018     105    13,097    7.4%   617    63    10,175    443    2    142    40    40    2,780    134 
2019     96    24,093    13.6%   1,204    44    13,363    447    2    1,226    212    50    9,504    545 
2020     100    22,302    12.6%   1,088    42    9,077    405        —      —      58    13,225    683 
2021     41    14,929    8.5%   1,532    17    6,725    233    3    3,121    1,021    21    5,083    278 
2022     27    9,272    5.2%   529    15    4,507    169        —      —      12    4,765    360 
2023     21    14,310    8.1%   585    11    10,482    348        —      —      10    3,828    237 
2024     18    4,325    2.4%   295    6    1,754    94        —      —      12    2,571    201 
Thereafter     31    9,174    5.3%   482    7    2,243    93    1    178    51    23    6,753    338 
     Total     645   $176,647    100.0%   8,661    326   $116,941    4,014    10   $4,856    1,377    309   $54,850    3,270 

____________________________

 

(1)Includes 4 office leases and 4 retail leases with combined annualized base rent of approximately $110,000 that are on a month-to-month basis.

The following table presents our top 10 tenants by annualized base rent and their related industry sector, as of September 30, 2015 (dollars and square feet in thousands):

 

   Tenant  Locations  Industry Sector  Annualized Base Rent (1)  % of Total Annualized Base Rent 

Square

Feet

  % of Occupied Square Feet
1  Charles Schwab & Co, Inc.  1  Securities, Commodities, Fin. Inv./Rel. Activities  $23,223    13.2%   594    6.9%
2  Sybase  1  Publishing Information (except Internet)   17,971    10.2%   405    4.7%
3  Northrop Grumman  1  Professional, Scientific and Technical Services   15,901    9.1%   575    6.6%
4  Stop & Shop  16  Food and Beverage Stores   14,983    8.5%   911    10.5%
5  Novo Nordisk  1  Chemical Manufacturing   4,536    2.6%   167    1.9%
6  Seton Health Care  1  Hospitals   4,339    2.5%   156    1.8%
7  Shaw’s Supermarket  4  Food and Beverage Stores   3,944    2.2%   240    2.8%
8  I.A.M. National Pension Fund  1  Funds, Trusts and Other Financial Vehicles   3,023    1.7%   63    0.7%
9  Apple, Inc.  2  Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing   2,963    1.7%   147    1.7%
10  TJX Companies  6  Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores   2,608    1.5%   272    3.1%
   Total  34     $93,491    53.2%   3,530    40.7%

_____________________________

 

(1)Annualized base rent represents the annualized monthly base rent of executed leases as of September 30, 2015.
  
Page | 19
 

LEASING ACTIVITY (continued)

The following series of tables details leasing activity during the four quarters ended September 30, 2015:

 

Quarter  Number of Leases Signed  Gross Leasable Area (“GLA”) Signed 

Average

Rent Per Sq. Ft.

  Average Growth / Straight Line Rent  Weighted Average Lease Term (mos)  Tenant Improvements & Incentives Per Sq. Ft.   Average Free Rent (mos)
Office Comparable (1)                     
Q3 2015   14    79,831   $35.11    33.4%   47   $27.93    0.9 
Q2 2015   16    57,885    31.33    39.7%   57    10.50    1.3 
Q1 2015   12    36,394    28.59    28.9%   48    11.16    1.6 
Q4 2014   9    34,887    29.69    12.6%   55    8.32    2.8 
Total - twelve months   51    208,997   $31.93    30.3%   51   $16.91    1.4 
                                    
Industrial Comparable (1)                                   
Q3 2015   0    —     $0.00    0.0%   0   $0.00    —   
Q2 2015   0    —      0.00    0.0%   0    0.00    —   
Q1 2015   1    1,200    3.75    7.0%   36    0.34    —   
Q4 2014   1    50,500    3.82    155.2%   124    7.30    4.0 
Total - twelve months   2    51,700   $3.82    147.4%   122   $7.14    3.9 
                                    
Retail Comparable (1)                                   
Q3 2015   19    139,735   $12.87    15.2%   75   $2.00    —   
Q2 2015   20    139,310    16.04    14.7%   58    0.62    —   
Q1 2015   12    140,021    18.49    9.6%   53    3.46    0.1 
Q4 2014   14    49,789    24.67    7.0%   42    0.75    —   
Total - twelve months   65    468,855   $16.15    12.0%   60   $1.89    0.0 
                                    
Total Comparable Leasing (1)                                   
Q3 2015   33    219,566   $18.76    24.9%   65   $11.43    0.3 
Q2 2015   36    197,195    20.48    24.3%   58    3.52    0.4 
Q1 2015   25    177,615    20.33    14.7%   52    5.01    0.4 
Q4 2014   24    135,176    12.93    14.9%   76    5.15    2.2 
Total - twelve months   118    729,552   $18.18    20.4%   62   $6.57    0.7 
                                    
Total Leasing                                   
Q3 2015   45    272,108   $18.14         63   $11.70    0.3 
Q2 2015   46    296,599    19.16         46    3.44    0.4 
Q1 2015   42    297,686    17.64         57    9.01    0.6 
Q4 2014   35    214,761    13.83         53    5.32    1.6 
Total - twelve months   168    1,081,154   $17.40         55   $7.43    0.7 

___________________________

 

(1)Comparable leases comprise leases for which prior leases were in place for the same suite within 12 months of executing a new lease. Comparable leases must have terms of at least six months and the square footage of the suite occupied by the new tenant cannot deviate by more than 50% from the size of the old lease’s suite.
   
Page | 20
 

INVESTMENT ACTIVITY

The following tables describe changes in our portfolio from December 31, 2013 through September 30, 2015 (dollars and square feet in thousands):

      Square Feet
Properties and Square Feet Activity  Number of Properties  Total  Office  Industrial  Retail
Properties owned as of                
December 31, 2013  82    15,250     5,132     7,046      3,072
2014 Acquisitions  3   585    262    —      323 
2014 Dispositions  (17)   (3,973)   (300)   (3,563)   (110)
Building remeasurement and other (1)     9    —      9    —   
December 31, 2014  68   11,871    5,094    3,492    3,285 
2015 Acquisitions  5   949    682    —      267 
2015 Dispositions  (15)   (3,060)   (1,374)   (1,583)   (103)
Building remeasurement and other (1)  1   3    2    —      1 
September 30, 2015  59   9,763    4,404    1,909    3,450 

________________________

(1)Building remeasurements reflect changes in gross leasable area due to renovations or expansions of existing properties. In the first quarter of 2015 we retained one building of a two-building campus while disposing of the other building, resulting in an additional property that we did not previously consider a distinct property.
Property Acquisitions  Segment  Location  Acquisition Date  Number of Properties  Contract Purchase Price  Square Feet
(dollars and square feet in thousands)                  
2014:                  
Durgin Square  Retail  Portsmouth, NH  5/28/2014   1   $24,700    138 
1st Avenue Plaza  Office  Denver, CO  8/22/2014   1    75,000    262 
Salt Pond  Retail  Narragansett, RI  11/4/2014   1    39,160    185 
Total 2014            3   $138,860    585 
2015:                        
Rialto  Office  Austin, TX  1/15/2015   1   $37,300    155 
South Cape  Retail  Mashpee, MA  3/18/2015   1    35,450    143 
City View  Office  Austin, TX  4/24/2015   1    68,750    274 
Venture Corporate Center  Office  Hollywood, FL  8/6/2015   1    45,750    253 
Shenandoah  Retail  Davie, FL  8/6/2015   1    32,670    124 
Total 2015            5   $219,920    949 

 

Page | 21
 

INVESTMENT ACTIVITY (continued)

 

Property Dispositions  Segment  Location  Disposition Date  Number of
Properties
  Contract Sales Price  Square Feet
(dollars and square feet in thousands)                  
During 2014                  
Industrial Portfolio  Industrial  Various (1)  1/22/2014   12   $175,000    3,386 
Cranston  Retail  Cranston, RI  2/18/2014   1    6,750    110 
Shackleford  Office  Little Rock, AR  2/25/2014   1    19,550    102 
Shadelands  Office  East Bay, CA  6/13/2014   1    5,700    60 
Lundy (2)  Industrial  Silicon Valley, CA  10/15/2014   1    13,579    177 
South Havana  Office  Denver, CO  11/7/2014   1    9,100    138 
Total 2014            17   $229,679    3,973 
                         
During 2015                        
Park Place  Office  Dallas, TX  1/16/2015   1   $46,600    177 
Office and Industrial Portfolio  Office and Industrial  Various (3)  3/11/2015   12    398,635    2,669 
Mt. Nebo  Retail  Pittsburgh, PA  5/5/2015   1    12,500    103 
2100 Corporate Center Drive  Office  Los Angeles, CA  7/20/2015   1    12,549    111 
Land parcel  N/A  Denver, CO  8/12/2015   —      7,577    —   
Total 2015            15   $477,861    3,060 

________________________

(1)The Industrial Portfolio comprised 12 industrial properties located in the Atlanta, GA, Cincinnati, OH, Central Pennsylvania, Columbus, OH, Dallas, TX, Indianapolis, IN, and Minneapolis, MN markets.
(2)Sales price for the Lundy property represents the principal balance outstanding of the mortgage note on the property as of the date of the foreclosure sale. Due to the contractual balance of the mortgage note, we did not receive any proceeds from the sale of Lundy.
(3)The Office and Industrial Portfolio comprised (i) six office properties comprising 1.1 million net rentable square feet located in Los Angeles, CA (three properties), Northern New Jersey, Miami, FL, and Dallas, TX, and (ii) six industrial properties comprising 1.6 million net rentable square feet located in Los Angeles, CA, Dallas, TX, Cleveland, OH, Chicago, IL, Houston, TX, and Denver, CO.

 

Page | 22
 

DEFINITIONS

This section contains an explanation of certain non-GAAP financial measures we provide in other sections of this document, as well as the reasons why management believes these measures provide useful information to investors about the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Additional detail can be found in the Portfolio’s most recent annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly report on Form 10-Q, as well as other documents filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time.

2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K

We refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2015, as our “2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.”

Annualized Base Rent

Annualized base rent represents the annualized monthly base rent of leases executed as of September 30, 2015.

Comparable Leases

Comparable leases comprise leases for which prior leases were in place for the same suite within 12 months of executing a new lease. Comparable leases must have terms of at least six months and the square footage of the suite occupied by the new tenant cannot deviate by more than 50% from the size of the old lease’s suite.

 

Fair Value as Determined by Our NAV Valuation Procedures

 

When the fair value of our real estate assets is calculated for the purposes of determining our NAV per share, the calculation is done using the fair value methodologies detailed within the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification under Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC Topic 820”). However, our valuation procedures and our NAV are not subject to GAAP and will not be subject to independent audit. In the determination of our NAV, the value of certain of our assets and liabilities are generally determined based on their carrying amounts under GAAP; however, those principles are generally based upon historic cost and therefore may not be determined in accordance with ASC Topic 820. Readers should refer to our audited financial statements for our net book value determined in accordance with GAAP from which one can derive our net book value per share by dividing our stockholders’ equity by shares of our common stock outstanding as of the date of measurement.

 

Our valuation procedures, which address specifically each category of our assets and liabilities and are applied separately from the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP, involve adjustments from historical cost. There are certain factors which cause NAV to be different from net book value on a GAAP basis. Most significantly, the valuation of our real estate assets, which is the largest component of our NAV calculation, will be provided to us by the Independent Valuation Firm on a daily basis. For GAAP purposes, these assets are generally recorded at depreciated or amortized cost. Other examples that will cause our NAV to differ from our GAAP net book value include the straight-lining of rent, which results in a receivable for GAAP purposes that is not included in the determination of our NAV, and, for purposes of determining our NAV, the assumption of a value of zero in certain instances where the balance of a loan exceeds the value of the underlying real estate properties, where GAAP net book value would reflect a negative equity value for such real estate properties, even if such loans are non-recourse. Third party appraisers may value our individual real estate assets using appraisal standards that deviate from market value standards under GAAP. The use of such appraisal standards may cause our NAV to deviate from GAAP fair value principles. We did not develop our valuation procedures with the intention of complying with fair value concepts under GAAP and, therefore, there could be differences between our fair values and the fair values derived from the principal market or most advantageous market concepts of establishing fair value under GAAP.

 

We include no discounts to our NAV for the illiquid nature of our shares, including the limitations on your ability to redeem shares under our share redemption programs and our ability to suspend or terminate our share redemption programs at any time. Our NAV generally does not consider exit costs (e.g. selling costs and commissions related to the sale of a property) that would likely be incurred if our assets and liabilities were liquidated or sold. While we may use market pricing concepts to value individual components of our NAV, our per share NAV is not derived from the market pricing information of open-end real estate funds listed on stock exchanges.

 

Please note that our NAV is not a representation, warranty or guarantee that: (1) we would fully realize our NAV upon a sale of our assets; (2) shares of our common stock would trade at our per share NAV on a national securities exchange; or (3) a stockholder would be able to realize the per share NAV if such stockholder attempted to sell his or her shares to a third party.

 

Page | 23
 

DEFINITIONS (continued)

Funds From Operations (“FFO”)

We believe that FFO, as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), is a meaningful supplemental measure of our operating performance because historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, as reflected through depreciation and amortization expense. However, since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market and other conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of operating performance for real estate investment trusts that consists of net income (loss), calculated in accordance with GAAP, plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization and impairment of depreciable real estate, less gains (or losses) from dispositions of real estate held for investment purposes.

Company-Defined FFO

As part of its guidance concerning FFO, NAREIT has stated that the “management of each of its member companies has the responsibility and authority to publish financial information that it regards as useful to the financial community.” As a result, modifications to FFO are common among REITs as companies seek to provide financial measures that meaningfully reflect the specific characteristics of their businesses. In addition to the NAREIT definition of FFO and other GAAP measures, we provide a Company-Defined FFO measure that we believe is helpful in assisting management and investors assess the sustainability of our operating performance. As described further below, our Company-Defined FFO presents a performance metric that adjusts for items that we do not believe to be related to our ongoing operations. In addition, these adjustments are made in connection with calculating certain of the Company’s financial covenants including its interest coverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio and therefore we believe this metric will help our investors better understand how certain of our lenders view and measure the financial performance of the Company and ultimately its compliance with these financial covenants. However, no single measure can provide users of financial information with sufficient information and only our disclosures read as a whole can be relied upon to adequately portray our financial position, liquidity and results of operations.

Our Company-Defined FFO is derived by adjusting FFO for the following items: acquisition-related expenses and gains and losses associated with extinguishment of debt and financing commitments. Historically, Management has also adjusted FFO for certain other adjustments that did not occur in any of the periods presented, and are further described in Item 7 of Part II of our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—How We Measure Our Performance.” Management’s evaluation of our future operating performance excludes these items based on the following economic considerations:

Acquisition-related expenses — For GAAP purposes, expenses associated with the efforts to acquire real properties, including efforts related to acquisition opportunities that are not ultimately completed, are recorded to earnings. We believe by excluding acquisition-related expenses, Company-Defined FFO provides useful supplemental information for management and investors when evaluating the sustainability of our operating performance, because these types of expenses are directly correlated to our investment activity rather than our ongoing operating activity.

 

Gains and losses on derivatives and on the extinguishment of debt and financing commitments — Gains and losses on derivatives represent the gains or losses on the fair value of derivative instruments that are not accounted for as hedges of the underlying financing transactions. Such gains and losses may be due to the nonoccurrence of forecasted financings or ineffectiveness due to changes in the expected terms of financing transactions. As these gains or losses relate to underlying long-term assets and liabilities, where we are not speculating or trading assets, our management believes that any such gains or losses are not reflective of our ongoing operations. Losses on extinguishment of debt and financing commitments represent losses incurred as a result of the early retirement of debt obligations and breakage costs and fees incurred related to certain of our derivatives and other financing commitments. Such losses may be due to dispositions of assets, the repayment of debt prior to its contractual maturity or the nonoccurrence of forecasted financings. Our management believes that any such losses are not related to our ongoing operations. Accordingly, we believe by excluding anticipated gains or losses on derivatives and losses on extinguishment of debt and financing commitments, Company-Defined FFO provides useful supplemental information for management and investors when evaluating the sustainability of our operating performance.

We also believe that Company-Defined FFO allows investors and analysts to compare the performance of our portfolio with other REITs that are not currently affected by the adjusted items. In addition, as many other REITs adjust FFO to exclude the items described above, we believe that our calculation and reporting of Company-Defined FFO may assist investors and analysts in comparing our performance with that of other REITs. However, because Company-Defined FFO excludes items that are an important component in an analysis of our historical performance, such supplemental measure should not be construed as a complete historical performance measure and may exclude items that have a material effect on the value of our common stock.

 

Page | 24
 

DEFINITIONS (continued)

Limitations of FFO and Company-Defined FFO

FFO (both NAREIT-defined and Company-Defined) is presented herein as a supplemental financial measure and has inherent limitations. We do not use FFO or Company-Defined FFO as, nor should they be considered to be, an alternative to net income (loss) computed under GAAP as an indicator of our operating performance, or as an alternative to cash from operating activities computed under GAAP, or as an indicator of liquidity or our ability to fund our short or long-term cash requirements, including distributions to stockholders. Management uses FFO and Company-Defined FFO as indications of our future operating performance and as a guide to making decisions about future investments. Our FFO and Company-Defined FFO calculations do not present, nor do we intend them to present, a complete picture of our financial condition and operating performance. In addition, other REITs may define FFO and an adjusted FFO metric differently and choose to treat acquisition-related expenses and potentially other accounting line items in a manner different from us due to specific differences in investment strategy or for other reasons; therefore, comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Our Company-Defined FFO calculation is limited by its exclusion of certain items previously discussed, but we continuously evaluate our investment portfolio and the usefulness of our Company-Defined FFO measure in relation thereto. We believe that net income (loss) computed under GAAP remains the primary measure of performance and that FFO or Company-Defined FFO are only meaningful when they are used in conjunction with net income (loss) computed under GAAP. Further, we believe that our consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP, provide the most meaningful picture of our financial condition and operating performance.

Specifically with respect to fees and expenses associated with the acquisition of real property, which are excluded from Company-Defined FFO, such fees and expenses are characterized as operational expenses under GAAP and included in the determination of net income (loss) and income (loss) from operations, both of which are performance measures under GAAP. The purchase of operating properties is a key strategic objective of our business plan focused on generating operating income and cash flow in order to fund our obligations and to make distributions to investors. However, as the corresponding acquisition-related costs are paid in cash, these acquisition-related costs negatively impact our GAAP operating performance and our GAAP cash flows from operating activities during the period in which properties are acquired. In addition, if we acquire a property after all offering proceeds from our public offerings have been invested, there will not be any offering proceeds to pay the corresponding acquisition-related costs. Accordingly, such costs will then be paid from other sources of cash such as additional debt proceeds, operational earnings or cash flow, net proceeds from the sale of properties, or other ancillary cash flows. Among other reasons as previously discussed, the treatment of acquisition-related costs is a reason why Company-Defined FFO is not a complete indicator of our overall financial performance, especially during periods in which properties are being acquired. Note that, pursuant to our valuation policies, acquisition expenses result in an immediate decrease to our NAV.

FFO and Company-Defined FFO may not be useful performance measures as a result of the various adjustments made to net income for the charges described above to derive such performance measures. Specifically, we intend to operate as a perpetual-life vehicle and, as such, it is likely for our operating results to be negatively affected by certain of these charges in the future, specifically acquisition-related expenses, as it is currently contemplated as part of our business plan to acquire additional investment properties which would result in additional acquisition-related expenses. Any change in our operational structure would cause the non-GAAP measure to be re-evaluated as to the relevance of any adjustments included in the non-GAAP measure. As a result, we caution investors against using FFO or Company-Defined FFO to determine a price to earnings ratio or yield relative to our NAV.

Further, FFO or Company-Defined FFO is not comparable to the performance measure established by the Investment Program Association (the “IPA”), referred to as “modified funds from operations,” or “MFFO,” as MFFO makes further adjustments including certain mark-to-market items and adjustments for the effects of straight-line rent. As such, FFO and Company-Defined FFO may not be comparable to the MFFO of non-listed REITs that disclose MFFO in accordance with the IPA standard. More specifically, Company-Defined FFO has limited comparability to the MFFO and other adjusted FFO metrics of those REITs that do not intend to operate as perpetual-life vehicles as such REITs have a defined acquisition stage. Because we do not have a defined acquisition stage, we may continue to acquire real estate and real estate-related investments for an indefinite period of time. Therefore, Company-Defined FFO may not reflect our future operating performance in the same manner that the MFFO or other adjusted FFO metrics of a REIT with a defined acquisition stage may reflect its operating performance after the REIT had completed its acquisition stage.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other regulatory body, nor NAREIT, has adopted a set of standardized adjustments that includes the adjustments that we use to calculate Company-Defined FFO. In the future, the Securities and Exchange Commission or another regulatory body, or NAREIT, may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the non-listed REIT industry at which point we may adjust our calculation and characterization of Company-Defined FFO.

 

Page | 25
 

DEFINITIONS (continued)

Gross Investment Amount

The allocated gross basis of real property and debt related investments, after certain adjustments. Gross Investment Amount for real property (i) includes the effect of intangible lease liabilities, (ii) excludes accumulated depreciation and amortization, and (iii) includes the impact of impairments. Amounts reported for debt related investments represent our net accounting basis of the debt investments, which includes (i) unpaid principal balances, (ii) unamortized discounts, premiums, and deferred charges, and (iii) allowances for loan loss.

Net Operating Income (“NOI”) and NOI – Cash Basis

We also use NOI as a supplemental financial performance measure because NOI reflects the specific operating performance of our real properties and debt related investments and excludes certain items that are not considered to be controllable in connection with the management of each property, such as other-than-temporary impairment, gains and losses related to provisions for losses on debt related investments, gains or losses on derivatives, acquisition-related expenses, losses on extinguishment of debt and financing commitments, interest income, depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, advisory fees, interest expense and noncontrolling interests. However, NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of our financial performance as a whole, since it does exclude such items that could materially impact our results of operations. Further, our NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating NOI. Therefore, we believe net income, as defined by GAAP, to be the most appropriate measure to evaluate our overall financial performance. “NOI – Cash Basis” is NOI after eliminating the effects of straight-lining of rent and the impact of above- and below-market lease amortization and other non-cash amortization adjustments to rental revenue.

Non-Recurring Capital Expenditures

We classify capital expenditures that significantly increase a property’s ability to generate additional revenues relative to our initial underwriting as non-recurring capital expenditures. Examples of such capital expenditures may include property expansions, renovations or other significant strategic upgrades. Conversely, we classify capital expenditures incurred to maintain a property’s ability to generate expected revenues as “recurring.” In addition, we also classify the following capital expenditures as non-recurring:

·        First Generation Leasing Costs: We classify capital expenditures incurred to lease spaces for which we have either (i) never had a tenant or (ii) we expected a vacancy of the leasable space within two years of acquisition as non-recurring capital expenditures.

·        Value-Add Acquisitions: We define a Value-Add Acquisition as a property that we acquire with one or more of the following characteristics: (i) existing vacancy equal to or in excess of 20%, (ii) short-term lease roll-over, typically during the first two years of ownership, that results in vacancy in excess of 20% when combined with the existing vacancy at the time of acquisition or (iii) significant capital improvement requirements in excess of 20% of the purchase price within the first two years of ownership. We classify any capital expenditures in Value-Add Acquisitions as non-recurring until the property reaches the earlier of (i) stabilization, which we define as 90% leased or (ii) five years after the date we acquire the property.

·        Other Acquisitions: For property acquisitions that do not meet the criteria to qualify as Value-Add Acquisitions, we classify all anticipated capital expenditures within the first year of ownership as non-recurring.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

We refer to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2015, as our “Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.”

Same Store Properties

In our analysis of NOI, particularly to make comparisons of NOI between periods meaningful, it is important to provide information for properties that were in-service and owned by us throughout each period presented. We refer to properties acquired or placed in-service prior to the beginning of the earliest period presented and owned by us through the end of the latest period presented as “Same Store Properties.” “Same Store Properties” therefore exclude properties placed in-service, acquired, repositioned, or in development or redevelopment after the beginning of the earliest period presented or disposed of prior to the end of the latest period presented. Accordingly, it takes at least one year and one quarter after a property is acquired or treated as “in-service” for that property to be included in “Same Store Properties.” For the purposes of this supplement, our “Same Store Properties” include properties classified as held for sale in our annual financial statements at the end of the most recently completed period.

Valuation Procedures

We refer to our Valuation Procedures filed as Exhibit 99.1 to our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K as our “Valuation Procedures.”

 

Page | 26