Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ENIGMA-BULWARK, LTD | Financial_Report.xls |
EX-31 - EX 31.1 SEC 302 CERT-CEO - ENIGMA-BULWARK, LTD | ex311section302certification.htm |
EX-32 - EX 32.2 SEC 906 CERT-CFO - ENIGMA-BULWARK, LTD | ex322section906certification.htm |
EX-31 - EX 31.2 SEC 302 CERT-CFO - ENIGMA-BULWARK, LTD | ex312section302certification.htm |
EX-32 - EX 32.1 SEC 906 CERT-CEO - ENIGMA-BULWARK, LTD | ex321section906certification.htm |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2014
or
o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from__________ to _________
Commission File Number 333-139045
PEARTRACK SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada | 26-1875304 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
1327 Ocean Avenue, Suite B, Santa Monica, California | 90401 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
|
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: | 310-899-3900 |
ECOLOGIC TRANSPORTATION, INC.
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x YES o NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
x YES o NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer | o |
| Accelerated filer | o |
|
| Non-accelerated filer | o |
| Smaller reporting company | x |
|
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
o YES x NO
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
57,065,061 common shares issued and outstanding as of November 18, 2014
PART 1 FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
The Companys unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014, form part of this quarterly report. They are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes included thereto for the year ended December 31, 2013, on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2014.
1
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
2
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
3
PEARTRACK SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. | ||||||
(FORMERLY ECOLOGIC TRANSPORTATION, INC.) | ||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | ||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||
|
| |||||
| For the nine months ended |
| ||||
| September 30, 2014 |
| September 30, 2013 |
| ||
Cash flow from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss | $ | (654,213 | ) | $ | (705,075 | ) |
Net loss from discontinued operations |
| 3,581 |
|
| 2,999 |
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
| (650,632 | ) |
| (702,076 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation/amortization of deferred compensation |
| 45,000 |
|
| 165,000 |
|
Accruals converted to related party loans |
| 351,500 |
|
| 187,500 |
|
Depreciation |
| 100 |
|
| 450 |
|
Loss on disposal of asset |
| 1,925 |
|
| |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in prepaid expenses |
| (984 | ) |
| |
|
Decrease in other assets |
| |
|
| 800 |
|
Increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, accrued interest, deferred compensation |
| 157,130 |
|
| 62,420 |
|
Increase in due to related parties |
| 95,956 |
|
| 221,672 |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
| (5 | ) |
| (64,234 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from related party loans |
| |
|
| 40,479 |
|
Common stock subscriptions received |
| 5 |
|
| |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
| 5 |
|
| 40,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing operations |
| |
|
| (23,755 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
| |
|
| 403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by discontinued operations |
| |
|
| 403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash |
| |
|
| (23,352 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash - beginning of period |
| |
|
| 23,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash - end of period | $ | |
| $ | 35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CASH ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of related party payable to note payable | $ | 351,500 |
| $ | 187,500 |
|
Conversion of debt into common stock | $ | 1,509,016 |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid | $ | 137,423 |
| $ | |
|
Income taxes paid | $ | |
| $ | |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
4
PEARTRACK SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
(formerly Ecologic Transportation, Inc.)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2014
NOTE 1. OVERVIEW
PearTrack Security Systems, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on September 30, 2005, under the name Heritage Explorations Inc. On June 20, 2008, the Company merged with its wholly owned subsidiary and changed its name to USR Technology, Inc. (USR). On June 26, 2008, USR, engaged primarily in the provision of international drilling services, began trading its common stock under the symbol USRT.
On July 2, 2009, pursuant to the agreement and plan of merger executed April 26, 2009, the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, Ecological Acquisition Corp., a Nevada corporation, merged with Ecologic Sciences, Inc., a Nevada corporation, whereby Ecologic Sciences, Inc. became the sole surviving entity. In addition, the Company changed its name to Ecologic Transportation, Inc., a company in the business sector of environmental transportation, under the trading symbol OTCQB.EGCT, The Company was originally structured with three operating subsidiaries under the parent company:
1. | Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc., a Nevada Corporation |
2. | Ecologic Products, Inc., a Nevada Corporation |
3. | Ecologic Systems, Inc., a Nevada Corporation |
The subsidiary companies Ecologic Products, Inc. and Ecologic Systems, Inc. were created to provide an infrastructure and support for Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc., the Companys primary operations and distribution channels for its environmental products.
On March 16, 2012, the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Ecologic Systems, Inc. (EcoSys) entered into a Share Exchange Agreement and Plan of Merger with Amazonas Florestal, Inc. (Amazonas) (the Share Exchange). As a result of the Share Exchange, 97% of EcoSys common stock was owned by the Amazonas shareholders, 3% of EcoSys common stock was owned by the Company (the EGCT Shares), and a change in control took place whereby Amazonas became a wholly owned subsidiary of EcoSys. On April 11, 2012, EcoSys, no longer the Companys subsidiary, changed its name to Amazonas Florestal, Ltd. (AZFL). As of September 30, 2014, the Company held 12,061,854 shares of AZFL common stock.
On September 26, 2014, in connection with the conversion of related party convertible debt in the amount of $1,127,657 (including principal and interest), and third party convertible debt in the principal amount of $381,359, an aggregate sum of $1,501,016 was converted into 30,180,321 restricted shares of the Companys common stock, at a strike price of $0.05 per share. As a result, the Companys total issued and outstanding common stock was increased to 57,065,061 shares.
On September 26, 2014, the Company entered into a Letter of Intent (LOI) with PearTrack Systems Group (PTSG), a Nevada corporation, and the Companys wholly owned subsidiary incorporated solely for the Merger, PearTrack Acquisition Corp (PTAC). Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the LOI, the parties executed an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) dated October 9, 2014, whereby effective October 17, 2014, among other things:
1.
by way of merger of PTSG with PTAC and the exchange of shares of the Companys common stock for shares common stock of PTSG, the Company will acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of PTSG;
2.
the Company will issue 51,358,555 shares of the Companys common stock to the shareholders of PTSG on a 5.13586 for 1 basis, thereby increasing the total issued and outstanding common shares to 57,065,061 shares;
3.
PTSG will become a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company;
4.
90% of the Companys common stock will be owned by the former PTSG shareholders and 10% of the Companys common stock will be owned by the current shareholders of the Company.
5.
no change in control of the Company will take place, as the majority shareholders of the Company are the majority shareholders of PTSG; and
6.
the Company will change its name to PearTrack Security Systems, Inc., under the new trading symbol PTSS.
Further, in connection with the merger, effective October 17, 2014, Mr. William B. Nesbitt resigned as President and CEO, and Mr. Edward W. Withrow Jr., the President of PTSG and currently a board member of the Company, was appointed Mr. Nesbitts successor. Mr. Nesbitt will remain a member of the Board, as well as President and CEO of the Companys subsidiaries, Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. and Ecologic Products, Inc. In addition, the Board seats increased to eight (8) members, and Mr. Arran de Moubray, Mr. Paul Bernard Burke and Mr. John D. Macey, currently directors of PTSG, were appointed members of the Board of Directors of the Company.
Going Concern
The Company has incurred losses since inception resulting in an accumulated deficit of $10,460,683, and a working capital deficit of $1,768,827, and further losses are anticipated. The Companys ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due, which may not be available at commercially reasonable terms There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to raise funds, in which case the Company may be unable to meet its obligations and the Company may cease operations. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern.
The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods shown. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue as a going concern.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation: This summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the Companys financial statements. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles, generally accepted in the United States of America, and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.
The Companys fiscal year end is December 31.
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Ecologic Products, Inc. and Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Company considers cash in banks, deposits in transit, and highly-liquid debt instruments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had no cash equivalents.
5
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management routinely makes judgments and estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates that are critical to the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the, estimates related to asset impairments of long lived assets and investments, classification of expenditures as either an asset or an expense, valuation of deferred tax assets, and the likelihood of loss contingencies. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Estimates and assumptions are revised periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the financial statements in the period it is determined to be necessary. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share: The Company calculates net income (loss) per share as required by ASC 450-10, "Earnings per Share." Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding. During the periods when anti-dilutive, common stock equivalents, if any, are not considered in the computation.
Comprehensive Loss: ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive loss and its components in the financial statements. As at December 31, 2013, the Company has no items that represent comprehensive loss and, therefore, has not included a schedule of comprehensive loss in the financial statements.
Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service has been provided, and collectability is reasonably assured. As at September 30, 2014, the Company has not commenced its principal operations.
The Companys revenue stream has been from Ecologic Shine®, the initial product marketed through the Companys subsidiary Ecologic Products, Inc. The Company has made limited sales to certain retail automobile maintenance chains for the purpose of product testing.
Property and Equipment: Property and equipment is carried at the cost of acquisition or construction and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Costs associated with repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Costs associated with improvements which extend the life, increase the capacity or improve the efficiency of the Companys property and equipment are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining life of the related asset. Gains and losses on dispositions of equipment are reflected in operations. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are 5 to 7 years.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of: In accordance with ASC 350-30, the Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their net book value may not be recoverable. When such factors and circumstances exist, the Company compares the projected undiscounted future cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amount. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value, based on market value when available, or discounted expected cash flows, of those assets and is recorded in the period in which the determination is made. The Company currently believes there is no impairment of its long-lived assets. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Companys products will continue. Either of these could result in future impairment of long-lived assets.
Income Taxes: Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. These assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.
The Company has net operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income. Future tax benefits for these net operating loss carryforwards are recognized to the extent that realization of these benefits is considered more likely than not. To the extent that the Company will not realize a future tax benefit, a valuation allowance is established.
Stock Based Compensation: The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Share-Based Payments, using the fair value method. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. Equity instruments issued to employees and the cost of the services received as consideration are measured and recognized based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued.
Fair Value Measurements: Pursuant to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures and ASC 825, Financial Instruments, an entity is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 and 825 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instruments categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 and 825 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 | Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
Level 2 | Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. |
Level 3 | Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
The Companys financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities. Pursuant to ASC 820 and 825, the fair value of cash is determined based on Level 1 inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The recorded values of all other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.
Investments in securities: Investments in securities are accounted for using the equity method if the investment provides the Company the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over an investee. Significant influence is generally deemed to exist if the Company has an ownership interest in the voting stock of the investee between 20% and 50%, although other factors, such as representation on the investee's Board of Directors, are considered in determining whether the equity method is appropriate. All other equity investments, which consist of investments for which the Company does not possess the ability to exercise significant influence, are accounted for under the mark to market method. Under the mark to market method of accounting, investments are marked to market, with unrealized gains and losses being excluded from earnings and reflected as a component of other comprehensive income.
6
Recent Accounting Pronouncements: The Company evaluates the pronouncements of various authoritative accounting organizations, primarily the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF), to determine the impact of new pronouncements on US GAAP and the impact on the Company. The Company has recently adopted the following new accounting standards:
Adopted:
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive (ASU 2013-02). This guidance is the culmination of the FASBs deliberation on reporting reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income. However, the amendments require disclosure of amounts reclassified out of AOCI in its entirety, by component, on the face of the statement of operations or in the notes thereto. Amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income must be cross-referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail. This standard is effective prospectively for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-07, Presentation of Financial Statements (Top 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting. The objective of ASU No. 2013-07 is to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting and to provide principles for the measurement of assets and liabilities under the liquidation basis of accounting, as well as any required disclosures. The amendments in this standard is effective prospectively for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When Net Operating Loss Carryforward Exists. The objective of ASU 2013-11 is to reduce diversity in practice by providing guidance on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits, and will better reflect the manner in which an entity would settle at the reporting date any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position when net operating loss carryforwards, similar tax losses, or tax credit carryforwards exist. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No, 2014-10, Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements for Development Stage Entities. The objective of ASU 2014-10 is to reduce the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements for development stage entities. This Update removes all incremental financial reporting requirements, and eliminates an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810. The amendments in this standard are effective retrospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted.
Not Yet Adopted:
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08 Presentation of Financial Statements (Top 205): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosure of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The objective of ASU No. 2014-08 is to clarify the criteria for determining which disposals can be presented as discontinued operations and also modifies related disclosure requirements. The standard is required to be adopted by public business entities in annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for new disposals beginning in the first quarter of 2014, provided financial statements have not been issued before the release of this standard. The Company is evaluating the effect, if any, adoption of ASU No. 2014-08 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future financial statements.
NOTE 3: INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES
Amazonas Florestal, Ltd. (formerly Ecologic Systems, Inc.)
On March 16, 2012, Ecologic Systems, Inc. (EcoSys), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company with two million (2,000,000) issued and outstanding shares of common stock, entered into a Share Exchange Agreement and Plan of Merger with Amazonas Florestal, Inc., resulting in, among other things, a change in control of EcoSys, whereby EcoSys was no longer a subsidiary of the Company. On April 11, 2012, EcoSys changed its name to Amazonas Florestal, Ltd. (AZFL), and Amazonas Florestal, Inc. became a wholly owned subsidiary of AZFL. Included in the Share Exchange was the condition that for a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days after the Closing, the shares of AZFL held by the Company would be subject to an anti-dilution provision that protected the Companys three percent (3%) ownership. As a result, on March 16, 2012, an additional 2,020,618 shares of AZFL common stock was issued to the Company, thereby increasing the Companys holdings to 4,020,618 shares, and maintaining the Companys 3% ownership.
On April 19, 2012, AZFL effectuated a 3 for 1 forward stock split, which increased the Companys holding to 12,061,854 shares of AZFL common stock.
As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company held 12,061,854 shares of AZFL common stock (the AZFL Shares) with a fair value of $32,567 and $120,619, respectively. Managements intent is to distribute the AZFL Shares in the form of a dividend, to the Companys shareholders of record on March 16, 2012 (the effective date of the Merger), once AZFL has filed an S1 Registration and registers the AZFL Shares. The date by which the Form S1 was to be filed was extended by mutual agreement to January 31, 2013. However, AZFL has not, to the Companys knowledge, caused to register the EGCT shares by filing a Form S1, and is in default of its agreement with the Company. The Company has requested that AZFL complete the registration so the stock distribution can be completed.
NOTE 4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consists of the following:
| September 30, 2014 |
| December 31, 2013 |
| ||
Office equipment | $ | 3,025 |
| $ | 3,025 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
| (1,100 | ) |
| (1,000 | ) |
Property and equipment, net, before disposals |
| 1,925 |
|
| 2,025 |
|
Less: disposal of equipment |
| (1,925 | ) |
| |
|
Property and equipment, net | $ | |
| $ | 2,025 |
|
On March 1, 2014, the Company disposed of its equipment, valued at $0, and recognized a loss in the amount of $1,925.
Depreciation expense totaled $100 and $450 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
7
NOTE 5. NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable consists of the following:
| September 30, 2014 |
| December 31, 2013 |
| ||
Skyy Holdings, Ltd. | $ | 204,110 |
| $ | 185,411 |
|
Prominence Capital LLC |
| 32,008 |
|
| 30,512 |
|
Total notes payable-short term |
| 236,118 |
|
| 215,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Kasper Group |
| 205,679 |
|
| |
|
Matrix Advisors LLC |
| 518,699 |
|
| 500,000 |
|
Adrian Pegler |
| 103,671 |
|
| |
|
Paul B. Burke |
| 103,671 |
|
| |
|
Total notes payable-long term-convertible |
| 931,720 |
|
| 500,000 |
|
Total notes payable | $ | 1,168,838 |
| $ | 715,923 |
|
On January 24, 2011, Skyy Holdings, Ltd. loaned the Company $100,000 evidenced by a Promissory Note bearing interest at the rate of 15%, with principal and interest payable 45 days from the date of issue, and thereafter at a rate of 25% per annum. As of September 30, 2014, the note remains outstanding and no demand has been made for repayment. Accrued interest at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $104,109 and $85,411, respectively.
On March 29, 2011, Prominence Capital LLC loaned the Company $25,000 evidenced by a Promissory Note bearing interest at the rate of 8% per annum with the principal balance due on demand. As of September 30, 2014, the note remains outstanding, and no demand has been made for repayment. Accrued interest at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $7,008 and $5,512, respectively.
On December 31, 2011, the Company issued a Promissory Note to The Kasper Group, a former related party, in the principal amount of $49,000 for consulting services rendered to the Company. On June 30, 2014, a modification to the note was made to 1) increase the principal amount by $139,755 for additional services rendered to the Company between January 1, 2012 and June 30, 2014; and 2) to provide a conversion feature, whereby the note is convertible into the Companys common stock at a strike price of $0.07 per share. On August 31, 2014, a modification to the note was made to 1) increase the principal by $381,359 for the assignment of principal from Huntington Chase Financial Group, a related party; and 2) modify the conversion strike price to $0.05 per share. The note bears interest at a rate of 7% per annum, and is due within one (1) year of written demand. On September 26, 2014, the Company received a Notice to Convert for the conversion of $381,359 in principal. As a result, 7,627,180 restricted shares of the Companys common stock were issued. As of September 30, 2014, the principal balance owed under the note was $188,755. Accrued interest at September 30, 2014 was $16,924.
On December 31, 2013, the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note to Matrix Advisors, LLC, in the principal amount of $500,000 for advisory services rendered to the Company. The note bears interest at a rate of 5% per annum, is due within 2 years, and is convertible into the Companys common stock at a price of $0.25 per share. Accrued interest at September 30, 2014, was $18,698.
On January 5, 2014, Huntington Chase Financial Group, a related party, assigned $100,000 of its Convertible Note Payable to Adrian Pegler, a non-related party. The note bears interest at a rate of 7% per annum, is due within one (1) year of written demand, and is convertible into the Companys common stock at a strike price of $0.07 per share. Accrued interest at September 30, 2014, was $3,672.
On January 5, 2014, Huntington Chase Financial Group, a related party, assigned $100,000 of its Convertible Note Payable to Paul Burke, a non-related party. The note bears interest at a rate of 7% per annum, is due within one (1) year of written demand, and is convertible into the Companys common stock at a strike price of $0.07 per share. Accrued interest at September 30, 2014, was $3,672.
Accrued interest on notes payable at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $154,083 and $90,923, respectively.
NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On October 12, 2009, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Huntington Chase, Ltd., a Nevada corporation, wherein Edward W. Withrow III, the Companys Chairman, owns a majority control. The consulting agreement provides for Huntington Chase, Ltd. to perform certain advisory functions, and to be paid $15,000 per month for a period of 3 years until October 12, 2012. A modification to the consulting agreement was made on October 12, 2012, to extend the term for an additional three years. On January 1, 2014, the party under which the consulting services are provided was modified to Huntington Chase Financial Group. The total consulting fees owing under this agreement at December 31, 2013 of $692,500, was converted to a convertible loan payable. On December 31, 2013, the principal amount of the note was modified to include cash loans made to the Company in the amount of $213,859, and the note in its entirety, including accrued interest of $51,204, was assigned to Huntington Chase Financial Group. Further modifications to the note have been made between January 1, 2014 and August 31, 2014 to 1) assign $581,359 in principal to certain non-related parties (Note 5); and 2) amend the principal amount to $445,000, to include additional unpaid compensation; and 3) change the conversion strike price from $0.07 to $0.05. The note, with a modified principal balance of $445,000, bears interest at a rate of seven percent (7%) per annum, is due within one (1) year of written demand, and is convertible into the Companys common stock. On September 26, 2014, the Company received a Notice to Convert for the conversion of $557,661, representing principal in the amount of $445,000 and accrued interest through August 31, 2014 in the amount of $112,661. As a result, 11,153,232 restricted shares of the Companys common stock were issued, and the note has been paid in full. Accrued interest at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, was $0 and $77,696, respectively.
On December 31, 2013, the Company issued a modification to consolidate all Promissory Notes payable to Huntington Chase Ltd. for cash loans made to the Companys subsidiary, Ecologic Products, Inc., in the aggregate principal sum of $153,912, and to assign the note in its entirety, including accrued interest of $27,368, to Huntington Chase Financial Group. The note bears interest at a rate of seven percent (7%) per annum, is due within one (1) year of written demand, and is convertible into the Companys common stock at a strike price of $0.07 per share. Accrued interest at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, was $35,427 and $27,369, respectively.
8
On November 1, 2011, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with William B. Nesbitt, for his services as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company (the Agreement). The initial term of the Agreement was for a period of twelve (12) months, and is automatically renewed annually unless terminated by either party. The Agreement provides for initial compensation of $10,000 per month for the first nine months, increasing to $20,833 effective August 1, 2012, having reached certain goals of the Company. In addition, the Agreement provides for expense reimbursements, an initial Stock Option grant of 1,500,000 shares of the Companys common stock, and annual performance options. Any unpaid compensation under the Agreement shall be converted to a Senior Note Payable on a monthly basis. As of December 31, 2013, accrued compensation in the amount of $454,166 has been converted into a Convertible Senior Promissory Note which bears interest at a rate of five percent (5%) per annum, is payable upon certain equity funding goals, and is convertible into the Companys common stock. Modifications to the note have been made between January 1, 2014 and August 31, 2014 to 1) increase the principal amount to $620,833, to include additional unpaid compensation; and 2) change the conversion strike price from $0.07 to $0.05. On September 26, 2014, the Company received a Notice to Convert for the conversion of $294,532, representing principal in the amount of $279,167 and accrued interest through August 31, 2014 in the amount of $15,365. As a result, 5,890,634 restricted shares of the Companys common stock were issued. As of September 30, 2014, the principal balance owed under the note was $362,499. Accrued interest at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, was $24,653 and $20,813, respectively.
On November 15, 2013, the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $150,000 to John Ogden, a director of the Company, for consulting services rendered to the Company. The note bears interest at a rate of five percent (5%) per annum, matures on November 15, 2015, and is convertible into the Companys common stock. On August 31, 2014, a modification to the note was made to change the conversion strike price from $0.08 to $0.05. On September 26, 2014, the Company received a Notice to Convert for the conversion of $155,938, representing principal in the amount of $150,000 and accrued interest through August 31, 2014 in the amount of $5,938. As a result, 3,118,768 restricted shares of the Companys common stock were issued, and the note has been paid in full. Accrued interest at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, was $0 and $945, respectively.
On November 15, 2013, the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $72,067 to Call Bucci, the Companys chief financial officer, for unpaid compensation. Modifications to the note have been made between November 16, 2013 and August 31, 2014, to 1) increase the principal to $116,067, to include additional unpaid compensation; and 2) to change the conversion strike price from $0.08 to $0.05. The note bears interest at a rate of five percent (5%) per annum, matures on November 15, 2015, and is convertible into the Companys common stock. On September 26, 2014, the Company received a Notice to Convert for the conversion of $119,525, representing principal in the amount of $116,067 and accrued interest through August 31, 2014 in the amount of $3,458. As a result, 2,390,507 restricted shares of the Companys common stock were issued, and the note has been paid in full. Accrued interest at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, was $0 and $454, respectively.
Related party transactions consists of the following:
| September 30, 2014 |
| December 31, 2013 |
| ||
Loans to the Company | $ | 516,412 |
| $ | 1,785,505 |
|
Accrued interest |
| 60,080 |
|
| 136,731 |
|
Total related party loans |
| 576,492 |
|
| 1,922,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued compensation |
| 19,000 |
|
| 151,755 |
|
Reimbursable expenses |
| 126,363 |
|
| 45,405 |
|
Total related party payable |
| 145,363 |
|
| 197,160 |
|
Total related party transactions | $ | 721,855 |
| $ | 2,119,396 |
|
Related party loans consist of the following convertible notes payable at September 30, 2014:
Related Party |
| Principal |
| Annual Interest Rate |
| Accrued Interest |
| Conversion Price |
| Term/Due |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huntington Chase Financial Group |
| $ | 153,913 |
| 7% |
| $ | $35,427 |
| $0.05 |
| 1 yr from demand |
|
William B. Nesbitt |
|
| 362,499 |
| 5% |
|
| 32,853 |
| $0.05 |
| Equity funding |
|
Total |
| $ | 516,412 |
|
|
| $ | 60,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
All outstanding related party notes payable bear interest at the rate of 5% to 7% per annum, are due and payable within one (1) year of written demand or upon certain equity funding, and are convertible into the Companys common stock at a price of $0.05 per share.
As at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, affiliates and related parties are due a total of $721,855 and $2,119,396, which is comprised of loans to the Company of $516,412 and $1,785,505, accrued interest of $60,080 and $136,731, accrued compensation of $19,000 and $151,755, and reimbursable expenses of $145,363 and $45,405, for a net decrease of $1,397,541.
The Companys decrease in loans to the Company of $1,269,093 is due to an increase in unpaid compensation owed to Huntington Chase Financial Group, William Nesbitt and Calli Bucci/MJ Management, LLC, all related party creditors, in the amount of $351,500 which has been converted to convertible notes payable; a decrease of $990,234 due to the conversion of debt into common stock, and a decrease of $630,359 resulting from the assignment/reclassification of debt to non-related parties.
The Companys decrease in unpaid compensation of $132,755 is due to an increase in unpaid compensation of $31,000 due to related parties, and a decrease of $163,755 which was converted into notes payable and transferred to non-related party notes payable (Note 5).
The Companys expenses reimbursable to related parties increased by $80,958 and $33,996 during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively, $60,771 and $64,956 of interest was accrued. In connection with the conversion of certain debt, accrued interest was reduced by $137,423. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, accrued interest payable to related parties was $60,080 and $136,731, respectively.
NOTE 7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Matrix Advisors, LLC a New York Limited Liability Company (Matrix) signed a consulting agreement with the Company effective October 1, 2009. The consulting agreement provides for Matrix Advisors to deliver advisory services to the Company for a period of three years (36 months) for a fee of $10,000 per month and options to purchase 2,287,547 shares exercisable at $0.25 per share for a term of three (3) years from September 1, 2009. The options were fully vested as of September 1, 2010. The Matrix consulting agreement expired September 1, 2012. As of September 30, 2014, the Company has accrued $370,000 in consulting fees owed under this agreement.
9
NOTE 8. COMMON STOCK
The total number of authorized shares of common stock that may be issued by the Company was increased to 250,000,000 with a par value of $0.001 per share.
The following reflect the effects of the 10-to-1 reverse stock split that occurred on October 17, 2014:
On September 26, 2014, in connection with a certain Notice to Convert received from a non-related party (Note 5), $381,359 in debt was converted at a price of $0.05 per share into 762,718 restricted shares of the Companys common stock. As a result, $380,596 was recorded as additional paid in capital.
On September 26, 2014, in connection with a certain Notice to Convert received from four (4) related parties (Note 6), $1,127,657 in debt was converted at a price of $0.05 per share into 2,255,314 restricted shares of the Companys common stock. As a result, $1,125,402 was recorded as additional paid in capital.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively, a total of $0 and $120,000 in deferred stock compensation was expensed. No deferred stock compensation expense remains.
As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, the Company had 5,706,506 and 2,688,474 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
NOTE 9. WARRANTS AND OPTIONS
The following reflect the effects of the 10-to-1 reverse stock split that occurred on October 17, 2014:
As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company has no warrants and 594,755 and 599,755 options issued and outstanding, respectively.
On November 1, 2011, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer, under which the Company granted qualified stock options to purchase 150,000 shares of its common stock for 5 years at an option price of $2.00 per share. The options, which vest quarterly over a three (3) year period at 12,500 shares per quarter, have been valued using the Black-Scholes valuation method at $1.20 per share or $180,000. The Company used the following assumptions in valuing the options: expected volatility 254%; expected term 5 years; expected dividend yield 0%, and risk-free interest rate of .90. The Company has recorded a total of $180,000 of deferred stock option compensation, of which $45,000 and $60,000 was expensed during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively. There remained deferred stock option compensation in the amount of $15,000 and $60,000 as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, 5,000 stock options issued in 2010 were cancelled.
Outstanding and Exercisable Options |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| Remaining |
| Exercise Price |
|
|
| ||
|
| Number of |
|
| Contractual Life |
| times Number |
| Weighted Average |
| ||
Exercise Price |
| Shares |
|
| (in years) |
| of Shares |
| Exercise Price |
| ||
$2.50 |
| 228,755 |
|
| 0.00 |
| $ | 571,887 |
|
| $2.50 |
|
$4.73 |
| 38,500 |
|
| 0.75 |
|
| 182,105 |
|
| $3.70 |
|
$3.20 |
| 75,000 |
|
| 1.50 |
|
| 240,000 |
|
| $3.50 |
|
$3.20 |
| 102,500 |
|
| 6.50 |
|
| 328,000 |
|
| $3.50 |
|
$2.00 |
| 150,000 |
|
| 2.25 |
|
| 300,000 |
|
| $3.10 |
|
|
| 594,755 |
|
|
|
| $ | 1,621,992 |
|
| $3.10 |
|
Options Activity | Number |
| Weighted Average |
| |
| Of Shares |
| Exercise Price |
| |
Outstanding at December 31, 2013 | 599,755 |
|
| $3.10 |
|
Issued | |
|
| |
|
Exercised | |
|
| |
|
Expired / Cancelled | (5,000 | ) |
| |
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2014 | 594,755 |
|
| $3.10 |
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively, the Company expensed a total of $45,000 and $60,000 in stock option compensation. There remains $15,000 and $60,000 in deferred stock option compensation at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
NOTE 10. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On December 1, 2012, the Company discontinued all operations related to the former activities involving the three year test market with Park N Fly, Inc. for the Companys car wash product and system, Ecologic Shine®. The 3-year test market with Park N Fly resulted in an accumulated deficit of $86,278 through September 30, 2014. In addition, certain advances were made to Ecologic Products, Inc. for the purpose of overhead expenses that were not directly attributable to the Park N Fly segment of operations. As a result, additional cash funds are required the in order to satisfy the accounts payable remaining. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had the following assets and liabilities relating to its discontinued operations:
| September 30, 2014 |
| December 31, 2013 |
| ||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany advances | $ | 72,302 |
| $ | 72,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and accumulated deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 158,580 |
| $ | 154,999 |
|
Net assets of discontinued operations | $ | 86,278 |
| $ | 82,697 |
|
The results of discontinued operations are summarized as follows: | For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 |
| Cumulative from September 1, 2009 to September 30, 2014 |
| ||
Revenue | $ | |
| $ | 1,192,191 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
| |
|
| 1,168,796 |
|
Gross profit |
| |
|
| 23,395 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
| |
|
| (91,200 | ) |
Interest expense |
| (3,581 | ) |
| (18,773 | ) |
Gain on sale of equipment |
| |
|
| 300 |
|
Net loss from discontinued operations | $ | (3,581 | ) | $ | (86,278 | ) |
10
NOTE 11. INCOME TAXES
Temporary differences are differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded when the ultimate realization of a deferred tax as the tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, are presented below:
| September 30, 2014 |
| December 31, 2013 |
| ||
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carry forwards | $ | 3,442,000 |
| $ | 3,219,000 |
|
Less valuation allowance |
| (3,442,000 | ) |
| (3,219,000 | ) |
Net deferred tax asset - continuing operations | $ | |
| $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carry forwards | $ | 27,000 |
| $ | 27,000 |
|
Less valuation allowance |
| (27,000 | ) |
| (27,000 | ) |
Net deferred tax asset - discontinued operations | $ | |
| $ | |
|
A reconciliation of income taxes computed at the US federal statutory income tax rate to the change in valuation allowance is as follows:
| Nine months ended |
| Year ended |
| ||
| September 30, 2014 |
| December 31, 2013 |
| ||
Income (loss) before taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations | $ | (738,684 | ) | $ | (1,434,190 | ) |
Discontinued operations |
| (3,581 | ) |
| (4,010 | ) |
Total income (loss) before taxes |
| (742,265 | ) |
| (1,438,200 | ) |
Statutory rate |
| 34% |
|
| 34% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computed expected tax payable (recovery) | $ | 253,000 |
| $ | 489,000 |
|
Non-recognizable income (loss) |
| (30,000 | ) |
| 37,000 |
|
Non-deductible expenses |
| |
|
| |
|
Change in valuation allowance |
| (223,000 | ) |
| (526,000 | ) |
Reported income taxes | $ | |
| $ | |
|
At this time, the Company is unable to determine if it will be able to benefit from its deferred tax asset. There are limitations on the utilization of net operating loss carry forwards, including a requirement that losses be offset against future taxable income, if any. In addition, there are limitations imposed by certain transactions which are deemed to be ownership changes. Accordingly, a valuation allowance has been established for the entire deferred tax asset. The increase in the valuation allowance for continuing operations was approximately $223,000 and $526,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively.
As of September 30, 2014, the Company had cumulative net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $10,200,000, and $8,177,000 for federal and state income tax purposes, respectively, which begin to expire in the year 01/01/2029. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 provides for an annual limitation of approximately $67,000 on the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards as the company underwent an ownership change in 2008, as defined in Section 382. This limitation has been reflected in the US federal and state net operating loss carryforwards. The Company has elected to forgo any carryback of its net operating losses.
The Company adopted uncertain tax position in accordance with ASC 740 on January 1, 2007, and has not recognized any material increase in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits as a result of the implementation. The Company estimates that the unrecognized tax benefit will not change within the next twelve months. The Company will continue to classify income tax penalties and interest, if any, as part of interest and other expenses in its consolidated statements of operations. The Company has incurred no interest or penalties as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
The amount of income taxes the Company pays is subject to ongoing examinations by federal and state tax authorities. To date, there have been no reviews performed by federal or state tax authorities on any of the Companys previously filed returns. The Companys 2008 and later tax returns are still subject to examination.
NOTE 12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
During the period October 1, 2014 through November 15, 2014, the Company increased its loans from related parties by $48,284, from a total of $721,855 at September 30, 2014 to $770,139 at November 15, 2014. The increase represents a net increase in convertible notes payable of $20,833 resulting from an increase in compensation converted to notes payable; an increase in accrued compensation of $19,000; and an increase in reimbursable expenses of $5,600; and an increase in accrued interest of $2,851. The loans bear interest at the rates of 5 to 7 percent per annum, are unsecured, are payable within one (1) year of written demand or upon equity funding, and are convertible into the Companys common stock at a price of $0.05 per share.
On October 17, 2014, the Company effected a 10-for-1 reverse stock split, whereby one (1) new share of the Companys common stock was issued for each 10 shares of common stock held, thereby reducing the total issued and outstanding shares from 57,065,061 shares to 5,706,506 shares. In addition, the Company increased its authorized preferred stock to 25,000,000 shares, and its authorized common stock to 250,000,000 shares.
On October 17, 2014, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 9, 2014, PearTrack Acquisition Corp., a Nevada corporation (PTAC), the Companys wholly owned subsidiary, merged with PearTrack Systems Group, Ltd., a Nevada corporation (PTSG), with PTSG as the surviving entity. In addition, the Company issued an aggregate of 51,358,555 restricted shares of the Companys common stock to the former PTSG shareholders on a 5.13586 for 1 basis. The issuance, representing approximately 90.00% of the Companys issued and outstanding shares of common stock, increased the total issued and outstanding common shares from 5,706,506 shares to 57,065,061 shares. As a result, PTSG became the Companys wholly owned subsidiary. In addition, the Company changed its name from Ecologic Transportation, Inc. to PearTrack Security Systems, Inc. and its trading symbol to OTCQB.PTSS.
Further, in connection with the Merger, effective October 17, 2014, Mr. William B. Nesbitt resigned as President and CEO, and Mr. Edward W. Withrow Jr., the President of PTSG and currently a board member of the Company, was appointed Mr. Nesbitts successor. Mr. Nesbitt remains a member of the Board, as well as President and CEO the Companys subsidiaries, Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. and Ecologic Products, Inc. In addition, the Board seats increased to eight (8) members, and Mr. Arran de Moubray, Mr. Paul Bernard Burke and Mr. John D. Macey, currently directors of PTSG, were appointed members of the Board of Directors of the Company.
11
In connection with the merger, the Company intends to effect spin-offs of its wholly owned subsidiaries, Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. and Ecologic Products, Inc., within ninety (90) days of the closing date of the merger. Pursuant to the terms of the spin-offs, a stock dividend in the amount of 57,065,061 shares of Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. common stock, and 57,065,061 shares of Ecologic Products, Inc. common stock, will be distributed to the Companys shareholders of record (excluding the former shareholders of PTSG) on the Record Date of December 15, 2014 on a pro rata basis. Subsequent to the spin-offs, Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. and Ecologic Products, Inc. will operate as separate entities independent of the Company.
* * * * *
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or the Companys future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may", "should", "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "estimates", "predicts", "potential" or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Companys or the Companys industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, the Company cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, the Company does not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.
The Companys unaudited consolidated financial statements are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Companys financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this quarterly report.
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect the Companys plans, estimates and beliefs. The Companys actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this quarterly report.
In this quarterly report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars. All references to "common shares" refer to the common shares of the Companys capital stock.
As used in this quarterly report and unless otherwise indicated, the terms we, us, our, our company and Ecologic refer to Ecologic Transportation, Inc., and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated.
Corporate History
The Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on September 30, 2005 under the name Heritage Explorations Inc. On June 20, 2008, the Company merged with its wholly owned subsidiary and changed its name to USR Technology, Inc. (USR). On June 26, 2008, USR, engaged primarily in the provision of international drilling services, began trading its common stock under the symbol USRT.
On July 2, 2009, pursuant to the agreement and plan of merger executed April 26, 2009, the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, Ecological Acquisition Corp., a Nevada corporation, merged with Ecologic Sciences, Inc., a Nevada corporation, whereby Ecologic Sciences, Inc. became the sole surviving entity. In addition, the Company changed its name to Ecologic Transportation, Inc., a company in the business sector of environmental transportation, under the trading symbol OTCQB.EGCT, The Company was originally structured with three operating subsidiaries under the parent company:
1. | Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc., a Nevada Corporation |
2. | Ecologic Products, Inc., a Nevada Corporation |
3. | Ecologic Systems, Inc., a Nevada Corporation |
The subsidiary companies Ecologic Products, Inc. and Ecologic Systems, Inc. were created to provide an infrastructure and support for Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc., the Companys primary operations and distribution channels for its environmental products.
On March 16, 2012, the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Ecologic Systems, Inc. (EcoSys) entered into a Share Exchange Agreement and Plan of Merger with Amazonas Florestal, Inc. (Amazonas) (the Share Exchange). As a result of the Share Exchange, 97% of EcoSys common stock was owned by the Amazonas shareholders, 3% of EcoSys common stock was owned by the Company (the EGCT Shares), and a change in control took place whereby Amazonas became a wholly owned subsidiary of EcoSys. On April 11, 2012, EcoSys, no longer the Companys subsidiary, changed its name to Amazonas Florestal, Ltd. (AZFL). As of September 30, 2014, the Company held 12,061,854 shares of AZFL common stock.
On September 26, 2014, in connection with the conversion of related party convertible debt in the amount of $1,127,657 (including principal and interest), and third party convertible debt in the principal amount of $381,359, an aggregate sum of $1,501,016 was converted into 30,180,321 restricted shares of the Companys common stock, at a strike price of $0.05 per share. As a result, the Companys total issued and outstanding common stock was increased to 57,065,061 shares.
On October 17, 2014, prior to the merger, the Company effected a 10-for-1 reverse stock split, whereby one (1) new shares of the Companys common stock was issued for each 10 shares of common stock held, thereby reducing the total issued and outstanding shares from 57,065,061 shares to 5,706,506 shares. In addition, the Company increased its authorized preferred stock to 25,000,000 shares, and its authorized common stock to 250,000,000 shares.
On October 17, 2014, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 9, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 51,358,555 restricted shares of the Companys common stock, representing approximately 90.00% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company, to the former shareholders of PearTrack Systems Group, Ltd. on a 5.13586 for 1 basis, thereby increasing the total issued and outstanding common shares from 5,706,506 shares to 57,065,061 shares. As a result, PearTrack Systems Group, Ltd. became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. No change in control of the Company occurred as a result of the merger, as the majority shareholders of the Company were the majority shareholders of PearTrack Systems Group, Ltd. prior to the merger. The Company changed its name from Ecologic Transportation, Inc. to PearTrack Security Systems, Inc. and its shares of common stock now trade under the symbol PTSS.
12
In connection with the merger, effective October 17, 2014, Mr. William B. Nesbitt resigned as President and CEO, and Mr. Edward W. Withrow Jr., the President of PearTrack Systems Group, Ltd. and currently a board member of the Company, was appointed Mr. Nesbitts successor. Mr. Nesbitt remains a member of the Board, as well as President and CEO the Companys subsidiaries, Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. and Ecologic Products, Inc. In addition, Mr. Arran de Moubray, Mr. Paul Bernard Burke and Mr. John D. Macey, currently directors of PearTrack Systems Group, Ltd., were appointed members of the Board of Directors of the Company.
Current Business
Effective October 17, 2014, the Company has three wholly-owned operating subsidiaries: PearTrack Systems Group, Ltd, Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. and Ecologic Products, Inc. The Company continues to develop its environmental transportation business through Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc., and has ongoing sales of the Companys waterless car wash products through Ecologic Products, Inc. However, the board of directors of the Company believes Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. and Ecologic Products, Inc. will be able to operate more effectively independently, with the goal of attracting new capital and exploiting their existing business, as well as having the flexibility to establish new relationships in order to achieve their respective goals of generating shareholder value.
As such, the Company intends to effect spin-offs of its wholly owned subsidiaries, Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. and Ecologic Products, Inc., within ninety (90) days of the closing date of the merger. Pursuant to the terms of the spin-offs, a stock dividend in the amount of 57,065,061 shares of Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. common stock, and 57,065,061 shares of Ecologic Products, Inc. common stock, will be distributed to the Companys shareholders of record (excluding the former shareholders of PTSG) on the Record Date of December 15, 2014 on a pro rata basis. Subsequent to the spin-offs, Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. and Ecologic Products, Inc. will operate as entities independent of the Company.
PearTrack Systems Group, Ltd.
As the Companys wholly owned subsidiary, PearTrack Systems Group, Ltd. will provide a suite of products in the M2M Telematics and Remote/Mobile Asset Tracking and Management Industry, including a GPS tracking system and devices targeting non-powered assets with a proprietary long-life battery system. The Company intends to enhance its tracking products, and is assessing the areas of growth, with particular emphasis on the intermodal container market.
Key components of PearTrack Tracking Products:
§
Battery Powered GPS Asset Tracking and Monitoring Systems with up to 10-year battery life for just about any remote asset, regardless of power supply.
§
Asset monitoring and alarm units ranging from a Personal Tracking device with a 30 day rechargeable battery, to a Container Security and Tracking Unit with a 10 year battery.
§
PT-700 or PT-1000: self-contained, wireless, concealable and easily fitted GPS enabled Asset Monitoring and Alert Systems with unique covert antenna kit, providing international GPS tracking (via GSM networks), temperature monitoring and door opening alerts sent directly to cell phone and/or email account.
§
PT Tracking Unit: a powerful Fault Monitoring and Service Management Tool that monitors Generators, Chillers, Reefers, Irrigation Pumps, and Heavy Plant operating conditions, providing automatic alerts for critical events such as Low Oil Pressure, Engine Over-Temperature, Grid Failure, Low Output Flow, Low Fuel Level, Battery Failure, and Out of Temperature Range.
§
PearTrack TeleAsset: a remote Asset Management, GPS Tracking and Monitoring System providing critical real-time event-driven GPS enhanced Event Alerts and Usage information, and enables superior remote asset management through a single web-based portal.
§
PearTrack TeleAsset Platform: provides an end-to-end solution including:
§
GPS enabled M2M interface hardware fitted discretely to each asset that monitors alarms, gathers data, and communicates information to the PearTrack web portal using GPRS via the GSM mobile networks.
§
Centrally managed asset data software to process alarms and alerts.
§
Web portal internet-based user interface accessible using a standard web browser from any Internet enabled PC or handheld device.
§
Customization, hosting and system integration to provide tailored solutions to meet specific customer needs.
The board of directors of the Company has approved the authorization of a capital raise of between three million ($3,000,000) dollars and five million ($5,000,000) dollars that will be used to grow the PearTrack business with the goal of generating shareholder value.
Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc.
After almost five (5) years, Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. has been unable to attract the requisite investor to fund its strategic plan, as a public company, or as part of a public company. It is the Companys belief that Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. will have more options available to it as a private company than it currently does as a wholly-owned operating subsidiary. Mr. William B. Nesbitt will remain as President and CEO of Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc.
Ecologic Products, Inc.
Ecologic Products, Inc. has had some success in its 3-year waterless car wash trial, undertaken in conjunction with Park N Fly in Atlanta, GA and Los Angeles CA, at Hartfield International Airport and LAX International Airport, respectively.
On February 27, 2014 the Company negotiated the sale of approximately 440 gallons of its Eco Shine, Eco Wash and Eco Prep products, representing approximately 2,640 car washes, to CISA Lubes NC, LLC a North Carolina operator of 33 quick auto lube operations in North Carolina.
The Company is currently developing a business plan for the retail distribution of the Ecologic Shine® product line.
Ecologic Products, Inc. has expanded its business objectives beyond the scope of sustainable water practices through its Eco Shine operations to sustainable products that target corporate and government markets and has pursued several technologies at various stages of development.
On June 15, 2014, the Company entered into a non-disclosure agreement with SheerWind, Inc., a Minnesota based innovative wind turbine company. The discussions with SheerWind were preliminary and did not move past the exchange of private information.
On June 26, 2014 the Company entered into a non-disclosure agreement with AquaFuel, Ltd., a Kent, United Kingdom based fuel technology company that has developed the first diesel generator to run on glycerin. Management negotiated, drafted and presented a Memorandum of Understanding to acquire an exclusive license for the United States. The Companys Chairman visited the AquaFuel headquarters for the purpose of demonstration of the AquaFuel generators and related due diligence. The Companys due diligence indicated that the current development of glycerin as a fuel was unlikely to be attractive to the marketplace. The Company is researching alternative bio fuel products that could work with the AquaFuel generators.
13
On June 12, 2014 the Company entered into a non-disclosure Agreement with SEaB Energy, Ltd. a Southampton, United Kingdom waste to energy Company. SEaB Energy develops waste to energy systems deploying a containerized advanced digestion (AD) process. The process will, by stabilizing organic wastes, generate biogas (that will be combusted within CHP engines to generate electricity) and a digestate that will be employed as an organic fertilizer. In June 2014, the Companys Chairman and SEaBs CEO met in London to discuss ways in which the Company could develop a business for SEaBs two primary products, the Muckbuster® and the Flexibuster©, in the United States. The Company worked to develop a plan to install the Muckbuster® product at Kennesaw State University, located in the greater Atlanta Georgia area. After review, discussion and due diligence it was decided that the quantity of bio waste that could be utilized by the Muckbuster® system was not large enough in daily volume to make the economics work. The Company will continue to seek to identify opportunities for the SEaB product line and will review its efforts at the end of the 2nd quarter 2015.
The Company believes that, as independent companies, Ecologic Products, Inc. and Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. can promote and brand themselves so as to operate successfully. Mr. William B. Nesbitt will remain as President and CEO of both companies.
Results of Operations
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, including operations of the Company and its wholly owned operating subsidiaries, Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. and Ecologic Products, Inc. only.
The following summary of the Companys results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Companys unaudited consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, which are included herein.
| For the three months ended |
| For the nine months ended |
| ||||||||
| September 30, 2014 |
| September 30, 2013 |
| September 30, 2014 |
| September 30, 2013 |
| ||||
Revenue | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | 5,375 |
| $ | 206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | 3,162 |
| $ | 170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | 2,213 |
| $ | 36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses | $ | 204,519 |
| $ | 184,319 |
| $ | 526,989 |
| $ | 639,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense | $ | (40,449 | ) | $ | (22,026 | ) | $ | (123,931 | ) | $ | (62,583 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of asset | $ | |
| $ | |
| $ | (1,925 | ) | $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations | $ | (245,018 | ) | $ | (206,345 | ) | $ | (650,632 | ) | $ | (702,076 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | $ | (1,099 | ) | $ | (1,011 | ) | $ | (3,581 | ) | $ | (2,999 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss | $ | (246,117 | ) | $ | (207,356 | ) |
| (654,213 | ) |
| (705,075 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (3,619 | ) | $ | |
| $ | (88,051 | ) | $ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and comprehensive loss | $ | (249,736 | ) | $ | (207,356 | ) | $ | (742,264 | ) | $ | (705,075 | ) |
Revenue
For the three month period ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, no revenue was generated.
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, revenue in the amount of $5,375 and $206 consisted of limited sales of car washing products to third-party retailers.
Cost of sales
For the three month period ended September 30, 2014, and 2013, respectively, no costs of sales were incurred.
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, cost of sales in the amount of $3,162 and $170 consisted of limited purchases of car washing products from wholesale manufacturer.
An increase in sales and related costs of sales resulted in an increase in gross profit for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014, of $2,177 compared to $36 for the same period last year.
General and Administrative Expenses
| Three months ended |
| Nine months ended |
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| September 30, |
| September 30, |
| Variances |
| ||||||||||||
| 2014 |
| 2013 |
| 2014 |
| 2013 |
| 3-month |
| 9-month |
| ||||||
Amortization of stock options granted | $ | 15,000 |
| $ | 15,000 |
| $ | 45,000 |
| $ | 45,000 |
| $ | |
| $ | |
|
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
| |
|
| 30,000 |
|
| |
|
| 120,000 |
|
| (30,000 | ) |
| (120,000 | ) |
Legal, accounting and professional fees |
| 14,920 |
|
| 13,750 |
|
| 43,433 |
|
| 47,685 |
|
| 1,170 |
|
| (4,252 | ) |
Management consulting services |
| 107,500 |
|
| 107,500 |
|
| 322,500 |
|
| 355,000 |
|
| |
|
| (32,500 | ) |
Other consulting fees |
| 45,000 |
|
| |
|
| 45,000 |
|
| |
|
| 45,000 |
|
| 45,000 |
|
Office supplies and miscellaneous expenses |
| 5,299 |
|
| 4,269 |
|
| 20,656 |
|
| 25,652 |
|
| 1,030 |
|
| (4,996 | ) |
Rent expense |
| 16,800 |
|
| 13,800 |
|
| 50,400 |
|
| 46,200 |
|
| 3,000 |
|
| 4,200 |
|
Total general and administrative expenses | $ | 204,519 |
| $ | 184,319 |
| $ | 526,989 |
| $ | 639,537 |
| $ | 20,200 |
| $ | (112,548 | ) |
14
General and administrative expenses in the amount of $204,519 for the three months ended September 30, 2014, were comprised of $15,000 of amortization of stock options, $14,920 of legal and accounting fees, $152,500 of management and other consulting fees, $5,299 of office overhead and other general and administrative expenses, and $16,800 of rent expense.
General and administrative expenses in the amount of $184,319 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, were comprised of $15,000 of amortization of stock options, $30,000 amortization of deferred stock compensation, $13,750 of legal and accounting fees, $107,500 of management and other consulting fees, $4,269 of office, overhead and other general and administrative expenses, and $13,800 of rent expense.
General and administrative expenses for the three month period ended September 30, 2014 of $204,519 as compared to $184,319 for the three month period ended September 30, 2013, resulted in an increasein general and administrative expenses for the current period of $20,200.
General and administrative expenses in the amount of $526,989 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, were comprised of $45,000 of amortization of stock options, $43,433 of legal and accounting fees, $367,500 of management and other consulting fees, $20,656 of office, overhead and other general and administrative expenses, and $50,400 of rent expense.
General and administrative expenses in the amount of $639,537 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, were comprised of $45,000 of amortization of stock options, $120,000 of amortization of deferred stock compensation, $47,685 of legal and accounting fees, $355,000 of management and other consulting fees, $25,652 of office, overhead and other general and administrative expenses, and $46,200 of rent expense.
General and administrative expenses for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 of $526,989 as compared to $639,537 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013 resulted in a decrease in general and administrative expenses for the current period of $112,548.
Significant changes in general and administrative expenses for the three month period ended September 30, 2014, compared to the three month period ended September 30, 2013, were attributable to the following items:
·
a decrease in amortization of deferred stock compensation of $30,000, due to certain deferred compensation fully expensed in the prior period, resulting in no expense in the current period;
·
an increase in legal, accounting and professional fees of $1,170, primarily due to an increase in miscellaneous legal services of $1,170;
·
an increase in management and other consulting fees of $45,000, resulting from outside services provided during the current period, compared to no expense in the prior period;
·
an increase in other general and administrative expenses of $4,030, due to an increase in office supplies and miscellaneous expenses of $1,030; and an increase in rent of $3,000.
Significant changes in general and administrative expenses for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014, compared to the nine month period ended September 30, 2013, were attributable to the following items:
·
a decrease in amortization of deferred stock compensation of $120,000, due to certain deferred compensation fully expensed in the prior period, resulting in no expense in the current period;
·
a decrease in legal, accounting and professional fees of $4,252, primarily due to a decrease in audit costs of $3,167 resulting from a change in audit firms; and a decrease in miscellaneous legal and accounting services of $1,085;
·
an increase in management and other consulting fees of $12,500, primarily due to a change in providers of outside services during the current period, compared to the prior period;
·
a decrease in other general and administrative expenses of $795, due to a decrease in office supplies and miscellaneous expenses of $4,996; and an increase in rent of $4,200.
General and administrative expenses for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 were incurred primarily for the purpose of advancing the Company closer to its financing and operating goals.
Net Loss
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company incurred a net loss from continuing operations of $654,213 compared with a net loss from continuing operations of $705,075 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The decrease in net loss of $50,862 is attributable to an increase in revenue of $5,169, an increase in cost of goods sold of $2,992, a decrease in general and administrative expenses of $112,548, an increase in interest expense of $61,348, a decrease in interest income of $8, and an increase in loss from disposal of asset of $1,925.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Working capital |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| September 30, 2014 |
| December 31, 2013 |
| Increase (decrease) |
| |||
Current assets | $ | 984 |
| $ | |
| $ | 984 |
|
Current liabilities |
| 1,769,811 |
|
| 2,878,014 |
|
| (1,108,203 | ) |
Working capital (deficit) | $ | (1,768,827 | ) | $ | (2,878,014 | ) | $ | 1,109,187 |
|
As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had no cash.
The Company had a working capital deficit of $1,768,827 as of September 30, 2014, compared to a working capital deficit of $2,878,014 at December 31, 2013. The decrease in working capital deficit of $1,109,187 is primarily attributable to an increase in prepaid insurance, an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $44,776; a decrease in related party payable of $51,796; a decrease in short term convertible notes payable of $1,121,378 due to the conversion of related party debt into common stock; and an increase in other short term notes payable of $20,195.
Cash Flows | For the nine months ended |
| ||||
| September 30, 2014 |
| September 30, 2013 |
| ||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (64,234 | ) |
Net cash provided by investing activities |
| |
|
| |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
| 5 |
|
| 40,479 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations |
| |
|
| (23,755 | ) |
Net cash provided by discontinued operations |
| |
|
| 403 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash | $ | |
| $ | (23,352 | ) |
15
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company used $5 of cash flow from operating activities, compared with using $64,234 of cash flow for operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities of $64,234 is primarily attributable to a reduction in the net loss from operations of $51,444, a decrease in stock option amortization of $120,000, an increase in accruals converted to related party loans of $164,000, a decrease in depreciation of $350, an increase in prepaid expenses of $984, a decrease in other assets of $800, an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $94,710, and a decrease in related party payables of $125,716.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company had no cash flows from investing activities.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company was provided with $5 of cash flows from financing activities, compared with $40,479 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The decrease in cash flows provided by financing activities of $40,474 is attributable to a decrease in related party loans.
As at September 30, 2014, affiliates and related parties are due a total of $721,855, which is comprised of loans to the Company of $516,412, accrued interest of $60,080, accrued compensation of $19,000, and reimbursable expenses of $145,363. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, loans to the Company decreased by $1,269,093, accrued interest decreased by $76,651, unpaid compensation decreased by $132,755 and reimbursable expenses increased by $80,958. All outstanding related party notes payable bear interest at the rate of 5% to 7% per annum, are due and payable within one (1) year of written demand or upon equity financing, and are convertible into the Companys common stock at a price of $0.05 per share.
The Companys principal sources of funds have been from sales of the Companys common stock and loans from related parties.
Contractual Obligations
The Company is a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is not required to provide the information under this item.
Going Concern
The Company has incurred losses since inception resulting in an accumulated deficit of $10,460,683, and a working capital deficit of $1,768,827, and further losses are anticipated. The Companys ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due, which may not be available at commercially reasonable terms There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to raise funds, in which case the Company may be unable to meet its obligations and the Company may cease operations. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements included with this quarterly report have been prepared on the going concern basis which assumes that adequate sources of financing will be obtained as required and that the Companys assets will be realized and liabilities settled in the ordinary course of business. Accordingly, the unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability of assets and classification of assets and liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Companys financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of the Companys financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Companys consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by managements application of accounting policies. The Company believes that understanding the basis and nature of the estimates and assumptions involved with the following aspects of the Companys financial statements is critical to an understanding of the Companys financial statements.
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
The Company computes earnings per share under Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 260-10, Earnings Per Share (ASC 260-10). Net earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Dilutive common stock equivalents consist of shares issuable upon conversion of convertible preferred shares and the exercise of the Companys stock options and warrants.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management routinely makes judgments and estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates that are critical to the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the, estimates related to asset impairments of long lived assets and investments, classification of expenditures as either an asset or an expense, valuation of deferred tax assets, and the likelihood of loss contingencies. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Estimates and assumptions are revised periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the financial statements in the period it is determined to be necessary. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when all applicable recognition criteria have been met, which generally include (a) persuasive evidence of an existing arrangement; (b) fixed or determinable price; (c) delivery has occurred or service has been rendered; and (d) collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured.
The Companys revenue stream has been from Ecologic Shine®, the initial product marketed through the Companys subsidiary Ecologic Products, Inc. The Company has made limited sales to certain retail automobile maintenance chains for the purpose of product testing.
16
Stock Based Compensation
The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Share-Based Payments, using the fair value method. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. Equity instruments issued to employees and the cost of the services received as consideration are measured and recognized based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company evaluates the pronouncements of various authoritative accounting organizations, primarily the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF), to determine the impact of new pronouncements on US GAAP and the impact on the Company. The Company has recently adopted the following new accounting standards:
Adopted:
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive (ASU 2013-02). This guidance is the culmination of the FASBs deliberation on reporting reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income. However, the amendments require disclosure of amounts reclassified out of AOCI in its entirety, by component, on the face of the statement of operations or in the notes thereto. Amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income must be cross-referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail. This standard is effective prospectively for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-07, Presentation of Financial Statements (Top 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting. The objective of ASU No. 2013-07 is to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting and to provide principles for the measurement of assets and liabilities under the liquidation basis of accounting, as well as any required disclosures. The amendments in this standard is effective prospectively for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When Net Operating Loss Carryforward Exists. The objective of ASU 2013-11 is to reduce diversity in practice by providing guidance on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits, and will better reflect the manner in which an entity would settle at the reporting date any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position when net operating loss carryforwards, similar tax losses, or tax credit carryforwards exist. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No, 2014-10, Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements for Development Stage Entities. The objective of ASU 2014-10 is to reduce the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements for development stage entities. This Update removes all incremental financial reporting requirements, and eliminates an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810. The amendments in this standard are effective retrospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted.
Not Yet Adopted:
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08 Presentation of Financial Statements (Top 205): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosure of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The objective of ASU No. 2014-08 is to clarify the criteria for determining which disposals can be presented as discontinued operations and also modifies related disclosure requirements. The standard is required to be adopted by public business entities in annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for new disposals beginning in the first quarter of 2014, provided financial statements have not been issued before the release of this standard. The Company is evaluating the effect, if any, adoption of ASU No. 2014-08 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future financial statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is not required to provide the information under this item.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Managements Report on Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Companys reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the Companys president, chief executive officer and chief financial officer to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the Companys disclosure controls and procedures, the Companys management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and the Companys management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As of September 30, 2014, the end of the Companys period covered by this quarterly report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys president, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Companys president, chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 that have materially or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal controls over financial reporting.
17
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company knows of no material existing or pending legal proceedings against us, nor is the Company involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of the Companys directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to the Company.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The Company is a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is not required to provide the information under this item.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY STANDARDS
Not Applicable
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
18
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number | Description | Filing Reference |
(2) | Plan of Purchase, Sale, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation or Succession |
|
2.1 | Letter of Intent between the Company and ACE Rent A Car, Inc. dated August 2, 2012 | Filed with the SEC on November 19, 2012 as part of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q |
2.2 | Letter of Intent between the Company and PearTrack Systems Group, Ltd. dated September 26, 2014 | Filed with the SEC on October 2, 2014 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
2.3 | Agreement and Plan of Merger between the Company, PearTrack Systems Group Limited and PearTrack Acquisition Corp effective October 17, 2014 | Filed with the SEC on October 23, 2014 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
(3) | Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws |
|
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation | Filed with the SEC on November 30, 2006 as part of the Companys registration statement on form SB-2 |
3.2 | Bylaws | Filed with the SEC on November 30, 2006 as part of the Companys registration statement on form SB-2 |
3.3 | Certificate of Change filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on April 2, 2008 | Filed with the SEC on April 21, 2008 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
3.4 | Articles of Merger | Filed with the SEC on June 26, 2008 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
3.5 | Certificate of Change filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on August 29, 2008 with respect to the reverse stock split | Filed with the SEC on September 17, 2008 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
3.6 | Articles of Merger | Filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
3.7 | Certificate of Change filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on May 15, 2009 with respect to the reverse stock split | Filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
3.8 | Articles of Merger filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on June 2, 2009 with respect to the merger between the Companys wholly owned subsidiary, Ecological Acquisition Corp. and Ecologic Sciences, Inc. | Filed with the SEC on July 9, 2009 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
3.9 | Certificate of Change filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on May 15, 2009, effective June 9, 2009 with respect to the merger between the Companys wholly owned subsidiary, Ecological Acquisition Corp., and Ecologic Sciences, Inc. | Filed with the SEC on July 9, 2009 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
3.10 | Certificate of Amendment filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on September 29, 2014, effective October 17, 2014 with respect to the authorized shares and name change | Filed with the SEC on October 2, 2014 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
(10) | Material Contracts |
|
10.1 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 26, 2009 | Filed with the SEC on April 30, 2009 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
10.2 | Employment agreement dated January 30, 2009 between the Company and Mr. Plamondon | Filed with the SEC on July 9, 2009 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
10.3 | Agreement dated April 28, 2009 between the Company and Audio Eye, Inc. | Filed with the SEC on July 9, 2009as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
10.4 | Agreement dated May 15, 2009 between the Company and Audio Eye, Inc. | Filed with the SEC on July 9, 2009 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
10.5 | Employment agreement dated June 29, 2009 between the Company and Mr. Keppler. | Filed with the SEC on July 9, 2009 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
10.6 | Memorandum of Understanding dated May 12, 2009 between the Company and Green Solutions & Technologies, LLC | Filed with the SEC on July 9, 2009 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
10.7 | Form of Debt Settlement Subscription Agreement dated July 1, 2009 between the Company and John L. Ogden | Filed with the SEC on July 9, 2009 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
10.8 | Service Agreement dated September 24, 2009 between Ecologic Products, Inc. and Park N Fly Inc. | Filed with the SEC on September 29, 2009 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
10.9 | Agreement dated September 29, 2009 between the Company and North Sea Securities LP. | Filed with the SEC on April 14, 2010 as part of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K |
10.10 | Consulting Agreement with Matrix Advisors, LLC dated October 1, 2009 | Filed with the SEC on April 14, 2010 as part of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K |
10.11 | Consulting Agreement with Huntington Chase Ltd. for Advisory Services dated October 12, 2009 | Filed with the SEC on April 14, 2010 as part of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K |
10.12 | Advisory Agreement for Executive Services of Norman A. Kunin dated as of January 1, 2010 | Filed with the SEC on August 16, 2010 as part of the Companys Current Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q |
10.13 | Independent Consulting Agreement between the Company and Prominence Capital, LLC effective as of April 5, 2010 | Filed with the SEC on August 16, 2010 as part of the Companys Current Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q |
10.14 | Agreement dated November 23, 2010 with BMO Capital Markets | Filed with the SEC on April 16, 2012 as part of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K |
10.15 | Independent Consulting Agreement between the Company and Oracle Capital Partners, LLC effective as of April 1, 2011. | Filed with the SEC on August 15, 2011 as part of the Companys Current Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q |
10.16 | Placement Agent Agreement between the Company and View Trade Securities, Inc. effective as of April 12, 2011 | Filed with the SEC on August 15, 2011 as part of the Companys Current Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q |
10.17 | Employment Agreement between the Company and William B. Nesbitt effective as of November 1, 2011 | Filed with the SEC on April 16, 2012 as part of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K |
10.18 | Share Exchange Agreement and Plan of Merger dated March 16, 2012 | Filed with the SEC on March 22, 2012 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
10.19 | Consulting Agreement between the Company and Greg Suess dated July 5, 2012 | Filed with the SEC on November 19, 2012 as part of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q |
10.20 | Consulting Agreement between the Company and NUF Enterprises LLC dated July 5, 2012 | Filed with the SEC on November 19, 2012 as part of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q |
10.21 | Engagement Letter between the Company and Wellington Shields & Co., LLC dated September 12, 2012 | Filed with the SEC on November 19, 2012 as part of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q |
10.22 | Engagement Letter between the Company and Wellington Shields & Co., LLC dated September 12, 2012 | Filed with the SEC on November 19, 2012 as part of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q |
10.23 | Modification Agreement between the Company and Huntington Chase Financial Group dated October 12, 2012 | Filed with the SEC on April 1, 2013 as part of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K |
(16) | Auditors Letters |
|
16.4 | Letter dated June 7, 2013 from Anton & Chia LLC | Filed with the SEC on June 10, 2013 as part of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K |
(21) | Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
|
21.1 | PearTrack Systems Group, Ltd. Ecologic Car Rentals, Inc. Ecologic Products, Inc. |
|
(23) | Consents |
|
23.1 | Letter from Seale and Beers, CPAs dated April 15, 2014 | Filed with the SEC on April 15, 2014 as part of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K |
(31) | Section 302 Certifications |
|
Filed herewith. | ||
Filed herewith. | ||
(32) | Section 906 Certifications |
|
Filed herewith. | ||
Filed herewith. | ||
(101) | Interactive Data Files |
|
101.INS** | XBRL Instance Document |
|
101.SCH** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
101.CAL** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
101.DEF** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
101.LAB** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
101.PRE** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
*
Filed herewith.
**
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
19
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
20