Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

x		Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014

o		Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the transition period from            to           

Commission File number 000-50210

ATEL Capital Equipment Fund IX, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California		94-3375584
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)		(I. R. S. Employer Identification No.)

The Transamerica Pyramid, 600 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (415) 989-8800

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: Limited Liability Company Units

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o    Accelerated filer o    Non-accelerated filer o    Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).Yes o No x

The number of Limited Liability Company Units outstanding as of October 31, 2014 was 12,055,016.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC

Index

Part I. Financial Information			3
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)			3
Balance Sheets, September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013			3
Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013			4
Statements of Changes in Members’ Capital for the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2014			5
Statements of Cash Flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013			6
Notes to the Financial Statements			7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			24
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			28
Part II. Other Information			30
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			30
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			30
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			30
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures			30
Item 5. Other Information			30
Item 6. Exhibits			30

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited).

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC

BALANCE SHEETS
 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 AND DECEMBER 31, 2013
(in thousands)

		September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
		(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents		$	5,016			$	4,738
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3 at September 30, 2014 and $3 at December 31, 2013			534				585
Notes receivable, net of unearned interest income of $29 at September 30, 2014 and $57 at December 31, 2013			380				526
Prepaid expenses and other assets			60				58
Investment in securities			5				5
Fair value of warrants			81				177
Investments in equipment and leases, net of accumulated depreciation of $26,250 at September 30, 2014 and $28,006 at December 31, 2013			16,205				19,890
Total assets		$	22,281			$	25,979
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Managing Member		$	42			$	35
Other			213				306
Non-recourse debt			9,707				13,105
Unearned operating lease income			135				186
Total liabilities			10,097				13,632
Commitments and contingencies
Members’ capital:
Managing Member			—				—
Other Members			12,184				12,347
Total Members’ capital			12,184				12,347
Total liabilities and Members’ capital		$	22,281			$	25,979

See accompanying notes.

3

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 AND 2013
(in thousands, except for units and per unit data)
(Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2014				2013				2014				2013
Revenues:
Leasing and lending activities:
Operating leases		$	1,222			$	1,348			$	3,834			$	4,288
Direct financing leases			596				717				1,880				2,230
Interest on notes receivable			8				14				28				49
Gain on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable			385				682				1,466				1,556
Unrealized loss on fair valuation of warrants			(4	)			—				(96	)			—
Gain on sales or dispositions of securities and warrants			—				—				44				1
Other revenue			12				91				80				225
Total revenues			2,219				2,852				7,236				8,349
Expenses:
Depreciation of operating lease assets			361				533				1,110				1,818
Asset management fees to Managing Member and/or affiliates			78				101				244				289
Cost reimbursements to Managing Member and/or affiliates			137				174				418				527
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses			2				10				—				(16	)
Impairment losses			37				63				37				219
Amortization of initial direct costs			2				3				8				12
Other management fees			7				7				21				27
Interest expense			166				239				554				770
Professional fees			21				16				102				78
Outside services			10				13				44				44
Insurance			14				15				40				47
Marine vessel maintenance and other operating costs			—				(7	)			—				103
Railcar and equipment maintenance			37				44				115				130
Franchise fees and state taxes			16				21				18				91
Other			37				48				121				146
Total operating expenses			925				1,280				2,832				4,285
Other expense, net			(1	)			—				(4	)			(1	)
Net income		$	1,293			$	1,572			$	4,400			$	4,063
Net income:
Managing Member		$	98			$	147			$	343			$	440
Other Members			1,195				1,425				4,057				3,623
		$	1,293			$	1,572			$	4,400			$	4,063
Net income per Limited Liability Company Unit (Other Members)		$	0.10			$	0.12			$	0.34			$	0.30
Weighted average number of Units outstanding			12,055,016				12,055,016				12,055,016				12,055,016

See accompanying notes.

4

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
 

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013
AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2014
(in thousands, except for units and per unit data)

		Other Members								Managing Member				Total
		Units				Amount
Balance December 31, 2012			12,055,016			$	14,940			$	—			$	14,940
Distributions to Other Members ($0.60 per Unit)			—				(7,233	)			—				(7,233	)
Distributions to Managing Member			—				—				(586	)			(586	)
Net income			—				4,640				586				5,226
Balance December 31, 2013			12,055,016				12,347				—				12,347
Distributions to Other Members ($0.35 per Unit)			—				(4,220	)			—				(4,220	)
Distributions to Managing Member			—				—				(343	)			(343	)
Net income			—				4,057				343				4,400
Balance September 30, 2014 (Unaudited)			12,055,016			$	12,184			$	—			$	12,184

See accompanying notes.

5

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 AND 2013
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2014				2013				2014				2013
Operating activities:
Net income		$	1,293			$	1,572			$	4,400			$	4,063
Adjustment to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable			(385	)			(682	)			(1,466	)			(1,556	)
Gain on sales or dispositions of securities and warrants			—				—				(44	)			(1	)
Unrealized loss on fair valuation of warrants			4				—				96				—
Depreciation of operating lease assets			361				533				1,110				1,818
Amortization of initial direct costs			2				3				8				12
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses			2				10				—				(16	)
Impairment losses			37				63				37				219
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable			11				(3	)			51				323
Prepaid expenses and other assets			(9	)			(13	)			(2	)			(4	)
Accounts payable, Managing Member			(1	)			29				7				12
Accounts payable, other			16				6				(93	)			(115	)
Deposits due lessees			—				(49	)			—				(49	)
Unearned operating lease income			2				33				(51	)			(101	)
Net cash provided by operating activities			1,333				1,502				4,053				4,605
Investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable			395				1,047				2,536				3,651
Proceeds from sales or dispositions of securities and warrants			44				—				44				1
Principal payments received on direct financing leases			518				406				1,460				1,183
Principal payments received on notes receivable			47				76				146				278
Net cash provided by investing activities			1,004				1,529				4,186				5,113
Financing activities:
Repayments of non-recourse debt			(1,151	)			(1,079	)			(3,398	)			(3,183	)
Distributions to Other Members			(1,206	)			(1,809	)			(4,220	)			(5,425	)
Distributions to Managing Member			(98	)			(147	)			(343	)			(440	)
Net cash used in financing activities			(2,455	)			(3,035	)			(7,961	)			(9,048	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents			(118	)			(4	)			278				670
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period			5,134				5,891				4,738				5,217
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	5,016			$	5,887			$	5,016			$	5,887
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest		$	172			$	245			$	572			$	787
Cash paid during the period for taxes		$	3			$	1			$	59			$	77

See accompanying notes.

6

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

1. Organization and Limited Liability Company matters:

ATEL Capital Equipment Fund IX, LLC (the “Company” or the “Fund”) was formed under the laws of the State of California on September 27, 2000 for the purpose of engaging in the sale of limited liability company investment units and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing, lending and sales activities, primarily in the United States. The Managing Member or Manager of the Company is ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS”), a California limited liability company. The Company may continue until December 31, 2020. Contributions in the amount of $600 were received as of December 31, 2000, $100 of which represented AFS’s continuing interest, and $500 of which represented the initial Member’s capital investment.

The Company conducted a public offering of 15,000,000 Limited Liability Company Units (“Units”), at a price of $10 per Unit. On February 21, 2001, subscriptions for the minimum number of Units (120,000, representing $1.2 million) had been received (excluding subscriptions from Pennsylvania investors) and AFS requested that the subscriptions be released to the Company. On that date, the Company commenced operations in its primary business (acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing, lending and sales activities). As of April 3, 2001, the Company had received subscriptions for 753,050 Units ($7.5 million), thus exceeding the $7.5 million minimum requirement for Pennsylvania, and AFS requested that the remaining funds in escrow (from Pennsylvania investors) be released to the Company.

As of January 15, 2003, the offering was terminated. As of that date, the Company had received subscriptions for 12,065,266 Units ($120.7 million). Subsequent to January 15, 2003, Units totaling 10,250 were rescinded or repurchased and funds returned to investors (net of distributions paid and allocated syndication costs, as applicable). As of September 30, 2014, 12,055,016 Units remain issued and outstanding.

The Company’s principal objectives are to invest in a diversified portfolio of equipment that (i) preserves, protects and returns the Company’s invested capital; (ii) generates regular distributions to the members of cash from operations and cash from sales or refinancing, with any balance remaining after certain minimum distributions to be used to purchase additional equipment during the reinvestment period (“Reinvestment Period”) (defined as six full years following the year the offering was terminated), which ended on December 31, 2009 and (iii) provides additional distributions following the Reinvestment Period and until all equipment has been sold. The Company is governed by the Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (“Operating Agreement”), as amended. On January 1, 2010, the Company commenced liquidation phase activities pursuant to the guidelines of the Operating Agreement.

Pursuant to the terms of the Operating Agreement, AFS receives compensation and reimbursements for services rendered on behalf of the Company (See Note 6). The Company is required to maintain reasonable cash reserves for working capital, the repurchase of Units and contingencies. The repurchase of Units is solely at the discretion of AFS.

These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Basis of presentation:

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q as mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of the Managing Member, necessary for a fair statement of financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

7

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Certain prior period amounts may have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no significant impact on the reported financial position or results of operations.

Footnote and tabular amounts are presented in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data.

In preparing the accompanying unaudited financial statements, the Managing Member has reviewed events that have occurred after September 30, 2014, up until the issuance of the financial statements. No events were noted which would require additional disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements.

Use of estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term and expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes and for determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts and reserve for credit losses on notes receivable.

Equipment on operating leases and related revenue recognition:

Equipment subject to operating leases is stated at cost. Depreciation is being recognized on a straight-line method over the terms of the related leases to the equipment’s estimated residual values. Off-lease equipment is generally not subject to depreciation. The Company depreciates all lease assets, in accordance with guidelines consistent with ASC 840-20-35-3, over the periods of the lease terms contained in each asset’s respective lease contract to the estimated residual value at the end of the lease contract. All lease assets are purchased only concurrent with the execution of a lease commitment by the lessee. Thus, the original depreciation period corresponds with the term of the original lease. Once the term of an original lease contract is completed, the subject property is typically sold to the existing user, re-leased to the existing user, or, when off-lease, is held for sale. Assets which are re-leased continue to be depreciated using the terms of the new lease agreements and the estimated residual values at the end of the new lease terms, adjusted downward as necessary. Assets classified as held-for-sale are carried at the lower of carrying amount, or the fair value less cost to sell (ASC 360-10-35-43).

The Company does not use the equipment held in its portfolio, but holds it solely for lease and ultimate sale. In the course of marketing equipment that has come off-lease, management may determine at some point that re-leasing the assets may provide a superior return for investors and would then execute another lease. Upon entering into a new lease contract, management will estimate the residual value once again and resume depreciation. If, and when, the Company, at any time, determines that depreciation in value may have occurred with respect to an asset held-for-sale, the Company would review the value to determine whether a material reduction in value had occurred and recognize any appropriate impairment. All lease assets, including off-lease assets, are subject to the Company’s quarterly impairment analysis, as described in Note 5. Maintenance costs associated with the Fund’s portfolio of leased assets are expensed as incurred. Major additions and betterments are capitalized.

Operating lease revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the underlying leases. The initial lease terms will vary as to the type of equipment subject to the leases, the needs of the lessees and the terms to be negotiated, but initial leases are generally on terms from 36 to 120 months. The difference between rent received and rental revenue recognized is recorded as unearned operating lease income on the balance sheet.

8

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Operating leases are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management considers the equipment underlying the lease contracts for impairment and periodically reviews the credit worthiness of all operating lessees with payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, the related operating leases may be placed on non-accrual status. Leases placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid lease payments is probable. Until such time, revenues are recognized on a cash basis.

The Company earns revenues from its marine vessel based on charter utilization of the vessel or a fixed term lease. When the vessel is chartered, contingent rentals and the associated expenses are recorded when earned and/or incurred. From time to time, the Company incurs “drydocking” costs on its vessel. Drydocking costs include labor and material costs related to refurbishing, overhauling and/or replacing engine and other major mechanical components of the vessel, hull maintenance and other repairs that bring the vessel into seaworthy compliance with U.S. marine codes in order to have it certified as available for charter. Such drydocking costs are capitalized and added to the equipment cost and depreciated over the period between scheduled drydockings, which generally occur every 24 to 30 months.

Segment reporting:

The Company is not organized by multiple operating segments for the purpose of making operating decisions or assessing performance. Accordingly, the Company operates in one reportable operating segment in the United States.

The primary geographic regions in which the Company seeks leasing opportunities are North America and Europe. The table below summarizes geographic information relating to the sources, by nation, of the Company’s total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and long-lived tangible assets as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

		Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2014				% of Total				2013				% of Total
Revenue
United States		$	7,161				99	%		$	8,085				97	%
Canada			—				0	%			148				2	%
United Kingdom			75				1	%			116				1	%
Total International			75				1	%			264				3	%
Total		$	7,236				100	%		$	8,349				100	%

		As of September 30,								As of December 31,
		2014				% of Total				2013				% of Total
Long-lived assets
United States		$	16,155				100	%		$	19,803				100	%
United Kingdom			50				0	%			87				0	%
Total International			50				0	%			87				0	%
Total		$	16,205				100	%		$	19,890				100	%

9

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

2. Summary of significant accounting policies: - (continued)

Investment in securities:

Purchased securities

Purchased securities are generally not registered for public sale and are carried at cost. Such securities are adjusted to fair value if the fair value is less than the carrying value and such impairment is deemed by the Managing Member to be other than temporary. Factors considered by the Managing Member in determining fair value include, but are not limited to, available financial information, the issuer’s ability to meet its current obligations and indications of the issuer’s subsequent ability to raise capital. There were neither impaired securities at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 nor investment securities sold or disposed of during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

Warrants

Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are reflected at an estimated fair value on the balance sheet as determined by the Managing Member. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded unrealized losses of $4 thousand and $96 thousand, respectively, on the fair valuation of its warrant holdings. Such unrealized losses reduced the estimated fair value of the Company’s portfolio of warrants to $81 thousand at September 30, 2014 from $177 thousand at December 31, 2013. There were no unrealized gains or losses recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. Gains of $44 thousand and $1 thousand were recognized on the net exercise of certain warrants during the first nine months of 2014 and 2013. None of such gains were recognized during the related third quarters.

Other expense, net:

Other expense, net consisted solely of net losses on foreign exchange transactions.

Per Unit data:

Net income and distributions per Unit are based upon the weighted average number of Other Members’ Units outstanding during the period.

Recent accounting pronouncements:

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is not permitted. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. The Company evaluated the impact of the new standard on its financial statements and has determined that such impact is virtually non-existent as the new revenue guideline does not affect revenues from leases and loans, which comprise the majority of the Company’s revenues.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014 – 15, Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The new standard provides guidance relative to management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements.

10

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

3. Notes receivable, net:

The Company has had various notes receivable from borrowers who have financed the purchase of equipment through the Company. The notes were secured by the equipment financed. As of September 30, 2014, only one note receivable remained unsettled with a net balance of $380 thousand outstanding. Such note bears an annual interest rate of 8.5% and matures in 2016.

There were no notes receivable deemed impaired or in non-accrual status as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

During the first quarter of 2013, the Company realized a $54 thousand gain on the full settlement of an impaired note prior to its scheduled maturity. Such note was originally deemed impaired during the second quarter of 2012, for which the Company recorded a fair value adjustment of $54 thousand to reduce the cost basis of the impaired note. There have been no additional early terminations of notes receivable subsequent to the first quarter of 2013.

As of September 30, 2014, the minimum future payments receivable are as follows (in thousands):

Three months ending December 31, 2014		$	55
Year ending December 31, 2015			166
2016			188
			409
Less: portion representing unearned interest income			(29	)
Notes receivable, net		$	380

4. Allowance for credit losses:

The Company’s allowance for credit losses are as follows (in thousands):

		Accounts Receivable Allowance for Doubtful Accounts												Valuation Adjustments on Financing Receivables								Total Allowance for Credit Losses
		Notes Receivable				Finance Leases				Operating Leases				Notes Receivable				Finance Leases
Balance December 31, 2012		$	—			$	7			$	48			$	54			$	—			$	109
Reversal of provision			—				(7	)			(45	)			—				—				(52	)
Asset disposal			—				—				—				(54	)			—				(54	)
Balance December 31, 2013			—				—				3				—				—				3
Provision			—				—				—				—				—				—
Balance September 30, 2014		$	—			$	—			$	3			$	—			$	—			$	3

Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable represent the amounts billed under operating and direct financing lease contracts, and notes receivable which are currently due to the Company.

Allowances for doubtful accounts are typically established based upon their aging and historical charge off and collection experience and the creditworthiness of specifically identified lessees and borrowers, and invoiced amounts. Accounts receivable deemed uncollectible are generally charged off against the allowance on a specific identification basis. Recoveries of amounts that were previously written-off are recorded as other income in the period received.

Accounts receivable are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management periodically reviews the creditworthiness of companies with lease or note payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment,

11

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

4. Allowance for credit losses: - (continued)

such leases or notes may be placed in non-accrual status. Leases or notes placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid receivable is probable. Until such time, revenues on operating leases are recognized on a cash basis. All payments received on amounts billed under direct financing leases contracts and notes receivable are applied only against outstanding principal balances.

Financing receivables

In addition to the allowance established for delinquent accounts receivable, the total allowance related solely to financing receivables also includes anticipated impairment charges on notes receivable and direct financing leases.

Notes are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and/or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the note agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest when due. If it is determined that a loan is impaired with regard to scheduled payments, the Company will perform an analysis of the note to determine if an impairment valuation reserve is necessary. This analysis considers the estimated cash flows from the note, or the collateral value of the property underlying the note when note repayment is collateral dependent. Any required valuation reserve is charged to earnings when determined; and notes are charged off to the allowance as they are deemed uncollectible.

The asset underlying a direct financing lease contract is considered impaired if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than its net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the estimated residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s expected holding period and estimates of undiscounted future rents. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the market place are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date.

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company’s allowance for credit losses (related solely to financing receivables) and its recorded investment in financing receivables were as follows (in thousands):

September 30, 2014		Notes Receivable				Finance Leases				Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance		$	—			$	—			$	—
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment		$	—			$	—			$	—
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment		$	—			$	—			$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		$	—			$	—			$	—
Financing receivables:
Ending balance		$	380			$	9,3601			$	9,740
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment		$	380			$	9,360			$	9,740
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment		$	—			$	—			$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		$	—			$	—			$	—

12

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

4. Allowance for credit losses: - (continued)

December 31, 2013		Notes Receivable				Finance Leases				Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance		$	—			$	—			$	—
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment		$	—			$	—			$	—
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment		$	—			$	—			$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		$	—			$	—			$	—
Financing receivables:
Ending balance		$	526			$	10,8232			$	11,349
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment		$	526			$	10,823			$	11,349
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment		$	—			$	—			$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		$	—			$	—			$	—

The Company evaluates the credit quality of its financing receivables on a scale equivalent to the following quality indicators related to corporate risk profiles:

Pass – Any account whose lessee/debtor, co-lessee/debtor or any guarantor has a credit rating on publicly traded or privately placed debt issues as rated by Moody’s or S&P for either Senior Unsecured debt, Long Term Issuer rating or Issuer rating that are in the tiers of ratings generally recognized by the investment community as constituting an Investment Grade credit rating; or, has been determined by the Manager to be an Investment Grade Equivalent or High Quality Corporate Credit per its Credit Policy or has a Not Rated internal rating by the Manager and the account is not considered by the Chief Credit Officer of the Manager to fall into one of the three risk profiles below.

Special Mention – Any traditional corporate type account with potential weaknesses (e.g. large net losses or major industry downturns) or, any growth capital account that has less than three months of cash as of the end of the calendar quarter to fund their continuing operations. These accounts deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, those potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the Fund’s receivable at some future date.

Substandard – Any account that is inadequately protected by the current worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Accounts that are so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Fund will sustain some loss as the likelihood of fully collecting all receivables may be questionable if the deficiencies are not corrected. Such accounts are on the Manager’s Credit Watch List.

Doubtful – Any account where the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. Accordingly, an account that is so classified is on the Manager’s Credit Watch List, and has been declared in default and the Manager has repossessed, or is attempting to repossess, the equipment it financed. This category includes impaired notes and leases as applicable.

13

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

4. Allowance for credit losses: - (continued)

At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company’s financing receivables by credit quality indicator and by class of financing receivables are as follows (excludes initial direct costs) (in thousands):

		Notes Receivable								Finance Leases
		September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013				September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
Pass		$	380			$	526			$	9,353			$	10,810
Special mention			—				—				—				—
Substandard			—				—				—				—
Doubtful			—				—				—				—
Total		$	380			$	526			$	9,353			$	10,810

At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the investment in financing receivables is aged as follows (in thousands):

September 30, 2014		31 – 60 Days Past Due				61 – 90 Days Past Due				Greater Than 90 Days				Total Past Due				Current				Total Financing Receivables				Recorded Investment >90 Days and Accruing
Notes receivable		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	380			$	380			$	—
Finance leases			—				—				—				—				9,353				9,353				—
Total		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	9,733			$	9,733			$	—

December 31, 2013		31 – 60 Days Past Due				61 – 90 Days Past Due				Greater Than 90 Days				Total Past Due				Current				Total Financing Receivables				Recorded Investment >90 Days and Accruing
Notes receivable		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	526			$	526			$	—
Finance leases			—				—				—				—				10,810				10,810				—
Total		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	11,336			$	11,336			$	—

The Company had neither financing receivables in non-accrual status nor impaired financing receivables at both September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Likewise, there were no investments in financing receivables with related accounts receivable past due more than 90 days which were still on an accrual basis at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

5. Investment in equipment and leases, net:

The Company’s investment in equipment leases consists of the following (in thousands):

		Balance December 31, 2013				Reclassifications, Additions/ Dispositions and Impairment Losses				Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases				Balance September 30, 2014
Net investment in operating leases		$	8,406			$	(739	)		$	(1,109	)		$	6,558
Net investment in direct financing leases			10,810				3				(1,460	)			9,353
Assets held for sale or lease, net			656				(371	)			(1	)			284
Initial direct costs, net of accumulated amortization of $91 at September 30, 2014 and $83 at December 31, 2013			18				—				(8	)			10
Total		$	19,890			$	(1,107	)		$	(2,578	)		$	16,205

14

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

5. Investment in equipment and leases, net: - (continued)

Impairment of investments in leases and assets held for sale or lease:

Recorded values of the Company’s leased asset portfolio are reviewed each quarter to confirm the reasonableness of established residual values and to determine whether there is indication that an asset impairment might have taken place. The Company uses a variety of sources and considers many factors in evaluating whether the respective book values of its assets are appropriate. In addition, the company may direct a residual value review at any time if it becomes aware of issues regarding the ability of a lessee to continue to make payments on its lease contract. An impairment loss is measured and recognized only if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than their net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s lease contract and undiscounted future rents from the existing lease contract. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the marketplace are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value (as determined by a valuation method using discounted estimated future cash flows, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets as applicable based on asset type) of the asset and its carrying value on the measurement date. Upward adjustments for impairments recognized in prior periods are not made in any circumstances.

As a result of these reviews, the Company recorded $37 thousand of fair value adjustments to reduce the cost basis of certain impaired off-lease equipment during the third quarter of 2014. Such amount also represents total fair value adjustments for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. By comparison, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded $63 thousand and $219 thousand of fair value adjustments to reduce the cost basis of impaired off-lease equipment.

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were no lease contracts placed in non-accrual status. As of the same dates, the Company had certain other leases that have related accounts receivables aged 90 days or more that had not been placed on non-accrual status. In accordance with Company policy, the related accounts receivables are fully reserved. Management continues to closely monitor these leases for any actual change in collectability status and indication of necessary valuation adjustments.

The Company utilizes a straight line depreciation method for equipment in all of the categories currently in its portfolio of operating lease transactions. Depreciation expense on the Company’s equipment was approximately $361 thousand and $533 thousand for the respective three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, and was $1.1 million and $1.8 million for the respective nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. Initial direct costs amortization expense related to the Company’s operating and direct financing leases totaled $2 thousand and $3 thousand for the respective three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, and was $8 thousand and $12 thousand for the respective nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

All of the leased property was acquired in years beginning with 2002 through 2010.

15

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

5. Investment in equipment and leases, net: - (continued)

Operating leases:

Property on operating leases consists of the following (in thousands):

		Balance December 31, 2013				Additions				Reclassifications or Dispositions				Balance September 30, 2014
Transportation, rail		$	11,635			$	—			$	723			$	12,358
Marine vessels			11,200				—				—				11,200
Transportation, other			4,639				—				(197	)			4,442
Manufacturing			2,174				—				(447	)			1,727
Agriculture			1,151				—				—				1,151
Materials handling			1,383				—				(363	)			1,020
Construction			759				—				(194	)			565
Natural gas compressors			1,671				—				(1,671	)			—
Other			57				—				(41	)			16
			34,669				—				(2,190	)			32,479
Less accumulated depreciation			(26,263	)			(1,109	)			1,451				(25,921	)
Total		$	8,406			$	(1,109	)		$	(739	)		$	6,558

The average estimated residual value for assets on operating leases was 15% and 17% of the assets’ original cost at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. There were no operating leases placed in non-accrual status as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

The Company may earn revenues from its containers, marine vessel and certain other assets based on utilization of such assets or a fixed-term lease. Contingent rentals (i.e., short-term, operating charter hire payments) and the associated expenses are recorded when earned and/or incurred. The revenues associated with these rentals are included as a component of Operating Lease Revenues and totaled $51 thousand and $2 thousand for the respective three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, and $148 thousand and $44 thousand for the respective nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

Direct financing leases:

As of September 30, 2014 investment in direct financing leases consists of materials handling and mining equipment. As of December 31, 2013, such investment primarily consisted of mining equipment. The following lists the components of the Company’s investment in direct financing leases as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands):

		September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
Total minimum lease payments receivable		$	9,253			$	12,584
Estimated residual values of leased equipment (unguaranteed)			3,543				3,542
Investment in direct financing leases			12,796				16,126
Less unearned income			(3,443	)			(5,316	)
Net investment in direct financing leases		$	9,353			$	10,810

There was no investment in direct financing lease assets in non-accrual status at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

16

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

5. Investment in equipment and leases, net: - (continued)

At September 30, 2014, the aggregate amounts of future minimum lease payments receivable are as follows (in thousands):

		Operating Leases				Direct Financing Leases				Total
Three months ending December 31, 2014		$	876			$	1,113			$	1,989
Year ending December 31, 2015			2,198				4,453				6,651
2016			487				3,686				4,173
2017			433				1				434
2018			256				—				256
2019			218				—				218
Thereafter			46				—				46
		$	4,514			$	9,253			$	13,767

The useful lives for each category of leases is reviewed at a minimum of once per quarter. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the respective useful lives of each category of lease assets in the Company’s portfolio are as follows (in years):

Equipment category		Useful Life
Transportation, rail			35 – 40
Marine vessels			20 – 30
Manufacturing			10 – 15
Natural gas compressors			10 – 15
Agriculture			7 – 10
Construction			7 – 10
Transportation, other			7 – 10
Materials handling			7 – 10

6. Related party transactions:

The terms of the Operating Agreement provide that AFS and/or affiliates are entitled to receive certain fees for equipment management and resale and for management of the Company.

The Operating Agreement allows for the reimbursement of costs incurred by AFS for providing administrative services to the Company. Administrative services provided include Company accounting, finance/treasury, investor relations, legal counsel and lease and equipment documentation. AFS is not reimbursed for services whereby it is entitled to receive a separate fee as compensation for such services, such as management of equipment. The Company would be liable for certain future costs to be incurred by AFS to manage the administrative services provided to the Company.

Each of ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) and AFS is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group and performs services for the Company. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; investor relations, communications and general administrative services for the Company are performed by AFS.

Cost reimbursements to the Managing Member are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Company. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as managed assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred. The Operating Agreement places an annual limit and a cumulative limit for cost reimbursements to AFS and/or affiliates. Any reimbursable costs incurred by AFS and/or affiliates during the year exceeding the annual and/or

17

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

6. Related party transactions: - (continued)

cumulative limits cannot be reimbursed in the current year, though such costs may be recovered in future years to the extent of the cumulative limit. As of September 30, 2014, the Company has not exceeded the annual and/or cumulative limitations discussed above.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, AFS and/or affiliates earned fees and billed for reimbursements pursuant to the Operating Agreement as follows (in thousands):

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2014				2013				2014				2013
Costs reimbursed to Managing Member and/or affiliates		$	137			$	174			$	418			$	527
Asset management fees to Managing Member and/or affiliates			78				101				244				289
		$	215			$	275			$	662			$	816

7. Non-recourse debt:

At September 30, 2014, non-recourse debt consists of notes payable to financial institutions. The notes are due in monthly installments. Interest on the notes is at fixed rates ranging from 6.16% to 6.66%. The notes are secured by assignments of lease payments and pledges of assets. At September 30, 2014, gross operating lease rentals and future payments on direct financing leases totaled approximately $10.1 million over the remaining lease terms; and the carrying value of the pledged assets is $11.2 million. The notes mature from 2015 through 2017.

The non-recourse debt does not contain any material financial covenants. The debt is secured by liens granted by the Company to the non-recourse lenders on (and only on) the discounted lease transactions. The lenders have recourse only to the following collateral: the specific leased equipment; the related lease chattel paper; the lease receivables; and proceeds of the foregoing items. The non-recourse obligation is payable solely out of the respective specific security and the Company does not guarantee (nor is the Company otherwise contractually responsible for) the payment of the non-recourse debt as a general obligation or liability of the Company. Although the Company does not have any direct or general liability in connection with the non-recourse debt apart from the security granted, the Company is directly and generally liable and responsible for certain representations, warranties, and covenants made to the lenders, such as warranties as to genuineness of the transaction parties’ signatures, as to the genuineness of the respective lease chattel paper or the transaction as a whole, or as to the Company’s good title to or perfected interest in the secured collateral, as well as similar representations, warranties and covenants typically provided by non-recourse borrowers and customary in the equipment finance industry, and are viewed by such industry as being consistent with non-recourse discount financing obligations. Accordingly, as there are no financial covenants or ratios imposed on the Company in connection with the non-recourse debt, the Company has determined that there are no material covenants with respect to the non-recourse debt that warrant footnote disclosure.

Future minimum payments of non-recourse debt are as follows (in thousands):

		Principal				Interest				Total
Three months ending December 31, 2014		$	1,170			$	153			$	1,323
Year ending December 31, 2015			4,616				420				5,036
2016			3,743				133				3,876
2017			178				1				179
		$	9,707			$	707			$	10,414

18

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

8. Commitments and Contingencies:

At September 30, 2014, the Company had no commitments to purchase lease assets or fund investments in notes receivable.

Gain Contingency

ATEL filed a claim on behalf of the Company and certain affiliated entities in Federal court in New Orleans for the under-reporting of revenue by a fleet manager of three marine vessels, seeking to recover an approximate amount of 10% of gross proceeds, which in the aggregate for all affiliated entities represents $2.8 million for the years 2005 – 2007 (of which the Company’s portion is an approximate $350 thousand). The annual allocable portion of the claim is not considered material to the Company in any given year. The trial was concluded during the first week of August 2012. In October 2012, the matter was remitted to the Federal Judge to render a decision on both the law and the facts. The decision of the Court was rendered at the end of June 2013 and the court found in favor of the defendants. The Company filed an appeal of the court’s decision and remained hopeful for a recovery of all or portion of its asserted claims. As a result of the ruling, the defendants filed a claim for legal fees and costs, however, this was denied. Oral arguments for the appeal of the case in substance were heard June 2, 2014, and on June 6, 2014, the Fifth Circuit Appellate Court rendered its decision denying the appeal.

9. Guarantees:

The Company enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Company has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.

The Managing Member knows of no facts or circumstances that would make the Company’s contractual commitments outside standard mutual covenants applicable to commercial transactions between businesses. Accordingly, the Company believes that these indemnification obligations are made in the ordinary course of business as part of standard commercial and industry practice, and that any potential liability under the Company’s similar commitments is remote. Should any such indemnification obligation become payable, the Company would separately record and/or disclose such liability in accordance with GAAP.

10. Members’ capital:

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, 12,055,016 Units were issued and outstanding. The Company was authorized to issue up to 15,000,000 Units in addition to the Units issued to the initial Members (50 Units).

The Company has the right, exercisable at the Manager’s discretion, but not the obligation, to repurchase Units of a Unitholder who ceases to be a U.S. Citizen, for a price equal to 100% of the holder’s capital account. The Company is otherwise permitted, but not required, to repurchase Units upon a holder’s request. The repurchase of Fund Units is made in accordance with Section 13 of the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement. The repurchase would be at the discretion of the Manager on terms it determines to be appropriate under given circumstances, in the event that the Manager deems such repurchase to be in the best interest of the Company; provided, the Company is never required to repurchase any Units. Upon the repurchase of any Units by the Fund, the tendered Units are cancelled. Units repurchased in prior periods were repurchased at amounts representing the original investment less cumulative distributions made to the Unitholder with respect to the Units. All Units repurchased during a quarter are deemed to be repurchased effective the last day of the preceding quarter, and are not deemed to be outstanding during, or entitled to allocations of net income, net loss or distributions for the quarter in which such repurchase occurs.

19

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

10. Members’ capital: - (continued)

As defined in the Operating Agreement, the Company’s Net Income, Net Losses, and Distributions are to be allocated 92.5% to the Members and 7.5% to AFS. In accordance with the terms of the Operating Agreement, additional allocations of income were made to AFS during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. The amounts allocated were determined to bring AFS’s ending capital account balance to zero at the end of each period.

Distributions to the Other Members were as follows (in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data):

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2014				2013				2014				2013
Distributions declared		$	1,206			$	1,809			$	4,220			$	5,425
Weighted average number of Units outstanding			12,055,016				12,055,016				12,055,016				12,055,016
Weighted average distributions per Unit		$	0.10			$	0.15			$	0.35			$	0.45

11. Fair value measurements:

Fair value measurements and disclosures are based on a fair value hierarchy as determined by significant inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs within the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis, generally on a national exchange.

Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in the market.

Level 3 – Valuation is modeled using significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. These unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, only the Company’s warrants were measured on a recurring basis. However, the Company recorded non-recurring adjustments to reflect the fair values of certain impaired off-lease assets during the first nine months of 2014, and those of impaired lease and off-lease assets during 2013. Amounts at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 reflect the fair value of the then existing impaired assets.

The Company’s valuation policy is determined by members of the Asset Management, Credit and Accounting departments. Whenever possible, the policy is to obtain quoted market prices in active markets to estimate fair values for recognition and disclosure purposes. Where quoted market prices in active markets are not available, fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, broker quotes, information from third party remarketing agents, third party appraisals of collateral and/or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by certain of the Company’s assumptions, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows. Potential taxes and other transaction costs are not considered in estimating fair values. As the Company is responsible for determining fair value, an analysis is performed on prices obtained from third parties. Such analysis is performed by asset management and credit department personnel who are familiar with the Company’s investments in equipment, notes receivable and equity securities of venture companies. The analysis may include a periodic review of price fluctuations and validation of numbers obtained from a specific third party by reference to multiple representative sources.

20

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

11. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

The measurement methodologies are as follows:

Warrants (recurring)

Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are carried on the balance sheet at an estimated fair value at the end of the period. The valuation of the warrants was determined using a Black-Scholes formulation of value based upon the stock price(s), the exercise price(s), the volatility of comparable venture companies, and a risk free interest rate for the term(s) of the warrant exercise(s). As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the calculated fair value of the Fund’s warrant portfolio approximated $81 thousand and $177 thousand, respectively. Such valuations are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the Company’s Level 3 recurring assets (in thousands):

		Level 3 Assets
Balance at December 31, 2013		$	177
Unrealized loss on warrants, net recorded during the period			(96	)
Balance at September 30, 2014		$	81

Impaired off-lease equipment (non-recurring)

During the third quarter of 2014, the Company deemed certain lease equipment (assets) to be impaired and recorded fair value adjustments of $37 thousand to reduce the cost basis of the equipment. Such amount also represents total fair value adjustments for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. By comparison, during the respective three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recorded $63 thousand and $219 thousand of fair value adjustments to reduce the cost basis of certain impaired lease and off-lease equipment. No additional adjustments were recorded during the fourth quarter of 2013. As of December 31, 2013, all impaired lease equipment was either disposed of or were re-categorized to off-lease equipment.

The aforementioned adjustments were non-recurring. Under the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the fair values of such impaired equipment are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy as the data sources utilized for the valuation of the assets reflect significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. Such valuation utilizes a market approach technique and uses inputs that reflect the sales price of similar assets sold by affiliates and/or information from third party remarketing agents not readily available in the market.

As of September 30, 2014, the fair value measurement of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis was nominal. The table below presents the December 31, 2013 fair value measurement of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and the level within the hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall (in thousands):

		December 31, 2013				Level 1 Estimated Fair Value				Level 2 Estimated Fair Value				Level 3 Estimated Fair Value
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired off-lease equipment		$	3			$	—			$	—			$	3

21

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

11. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

The following tables summarize the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used for the Company’s recurring and non-recurring fair value adjustments categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

September 30, 2014
Name		Valuation Frequency		Valuation Technique		Unobservable Inputs		Range of Input Values
Warrants		Recurring		Black-Scholes formulation		Stock price		$1.12 – $50.94
						Exercise price		$0.16 – $50.94
						Time to maturity (in years)		0.08 – 5.75
						Risk-free interest rate		0.02% – 1.95%
						Annualized volatility		16.15% – 100.00%
Off-lease Equipment		Non-recurring		Market Approach		Third Party Agents’ Pricing   Quotes – per equipment		$100 – $300 (total of $400)
						Equipment Condition		Poor to Average

December 31, 2013
Name		Valuation Frequency		Valuation Technique		Unobservable Inputs		Range of Input Values
Warrants		Recurring		Black-Scholes formulation		Stock price		$1.12 – $50.94
						Exercise price		$0.16 – $50.94
						Time to maturity (in years)		0.62 – 7.00
						Risk-free interest rate		0.11% – 2.28%
						Annualized volatility		17.80% – 100.00%
Off-lease Equipment		Non-recurring		Market Approach		Third Party Agents’ Pricing   Quotes – per equipment		$500 (total of $2,500)
						Equipment Condition		Poor to Average

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions, set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments, are made solely to comply with the requirements of the Financial Instruments Topic.

The Company has determined the estimated fair value amounts by using market information and valuation methodologies that it considers appropriate and consistent with the fair value accounting guidance. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Cash and cash equivalents

The recorded amounts of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value because of the liquidity and short-term maturity of these instruments.

22

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

11. Fair value measurements: - (continued)

Notes receivable

The fair value of the Company’s notes receivable is generally estimated based upon various methodologies deployed by financial and credit management including, but not limited to, credit analysis, third party appraisal and/or discounted cash flow analysis based upon current market valuation techniques and market rates for similar types of lending arrangements, which may consider adjustments for impaired loans as deemed necessary.

Investment in securities

The Company’s investment securities are not registered for public sale and are carried at cost which management believes approximates fair value, as appropriately adjusted for impairment.

Non-recourse debt

The fair value of the Company’s non-recourse debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based upon current market borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Commitments and Contingencies

Management has determined that the fair value of contingent liabilities (or guarantees) is not considered material because management believes there has been no event that has occurred wherein a guarantee liability has been incurred or will likely be incurred.

The following tables present estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands):

		Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2014
		Carrying Amount				Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	5,016			$	5,016			$	—			$	—			$	5,016
Notes receivable, net			380				—				—				380				380
Investment in securities			5				—				—				5				5
Warrants			81				—				—				81				81
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt			9,707				—				—				9,974				9,974

		Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013
		Carrying Amount				Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	4,738			$	4,738			$	—			$	—			$	4,738
Notes receivable, net			526				—				—				526				526
Investment in securities			5				—				—				5				5
Warrants			177				—				—				177				177
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt			13,105				—				—				13,575				13,575

23

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Statements contained in this Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, which are not historical facts, may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. In particular, economic recession and changes in general economic conditions, including, fluctuations in demand for equipment, lease rates, and interest rates, may result in delays in investment and reinvestment, delays in leasing, re-leasing, and disposition of equipment, and reduced returns on invested capital. The Company’s performance is subject to risks relating to lessee defaults and the creditworthiness of its lessees. The Company’s performance is also subject to risks relating to the value of its equipment at the end of its leases, which may be affected by the condition of the equipment, technological obsolescence and the markets for new and used equipment at the end of lease terms. Investors are cautioned not to attribute undue certainty to these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than as required by law.

Overview

ATEL Capital Equipment Fund IX, LLC (the “Company” or the “Fund”) is a California limited liability company that was formed in September 2000 for the purpose of engaging in the sale of limited liability company investment units and acquiring equipment to generate revenues from equipment leasing, lending and sales activities, primarily in the United States. The Managing Member of the Company is ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS”), a California limited liability company.

The Company conducted a public offering of 15,000,000 Limited Liability Company Units, at a price of $10 per Unit. The offering was terminated in January 2003. During early 2003, the Company completed its initial acquisition stage with the investment of the net proceeds from the public offering of Units. Subsequently, during the reinvestment period (“Reinvestment Period”) (defined as six full years following the year the offering was terminated), the Company utilized its credit facilities and reinvested cash flow in excess of certain amounts required to be distributed to the Other Members to acquire additional equipment.

The Company may continue until December 31, 2020. However, pursuant to the guidelines of the Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (“Operating Agreement”), the Company commenced liquidation phase activities subsequent to the end of the Reinvestment Period which ended on December 31, 2009. Periodic distributions will be paid at the discretion of the Managing Member.

Results of Operations

The three months ended September 30, 2014 versus the three months ended September 30, 2013

The Company had net income of $1.3 million and $1.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The results for the third quarter of 2014 reflect decreases in total revenues and total operating expenses when compared to the prior year period.

Revenues

Total revenues for the third quarter of 2014 decreased by $633 thousand, or 22%, as compared to the prior year period. The net decrease in total revenues was primarily due to decreases in gains recognized on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable, operating lease revenues, direct financing lease revenues and other revenue.

The decrease in gain on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable totaled $297 thousand and was primarily due to the decline in volume and change in the mix of assets sold. Operating lease revenues declined by $126 thousand as a result of continued run-off and sales of lease assets. Direct financing lease revenues was reduced by $121 thousand largely due to run-off of the portfolio; and, other revenue declined by $79 thousand as the prior year period amounts included fees associated with the termination of the marine vessel lease, and additional billings for excess wear and tear on returned equipment.

24

Expenses

Total expenses for the third quarter of 2014 decreased by $355 thousand, or 28%, as compared to the prior year period. The net decline in expenses was primarily due to decreases in depreciation expense, interest expense, cost reimbursements to AFS, impairment losses and asset management fees to AFS.

The decrease in depreciation expense totaled $172 thousand and was primarily a result of continued run-off and sales of lease assets, and an increase in the number of assets that have been fully depreciated since September 30, 2013. Interest expense was reduced by $73 thousand as a result of a $4.5 million net decrease in outstanding borrowings since September 30, 2013. Cost reimbursements to AFS decreased by $37 thousand largely due to lower costs allocated by the Manager based on the Company’s declining asset base and operations, consistent with a fund in liquidation.

Moreover, the decline in impairment losses totaled $26 thousand and was attributable to a decrease in fair value adjustments to reduce the cost basis of certain impaired off-lease equipment, including certain materials handling equipment and vehicles, based on information and/or pricing quotes from third party remarketing agents. Finally, asset management fees paid to AFS declined by $23 thousand as a result of continued decline in managed assets and related rents.

The nine months ended September 30, 2014 versus the nine months ended September 30, 2013

The Company had net income of $4.4 million and $4.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The results for the first nine months of 2014 reflect decreases in total operating expenses and total revenues when compared to the prior year period.

Revenues

Total revenues for the first nine months of 2014 decreased by $1.1 million, or 13%, as compared to the prior year period. The net decline in total revenues was largely a result of decreases in both operating and direct financing lease revenues, a decline in other revenue, an unrealized loss on fair valuation of warrants, and a decrease in gain on sale of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable.

The decrease in operating and direct financing lease revenues totaled $454 thousand and $350 thousand, respectively. The decline in operating lease revenues was largely due to the impact of continued run-off and disposition of lease assets; while the decrease in direct financing lease revenues was attributable to run-off of the portfolio. Other revenue declined by $145 thousand as the prior year period amount included fees associated with the termination of the marine vessel lease, and additional billings for excess wear and tear on returned equipment.

Moreover, the unrealized loss on fair valuation of warrants totaled $96 thousand and was a result of the revaluation of certain warrant positions in the Fund’s portfolio. Finally, the decrease in gain on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes receivable totaled $90 thousand and was primarily due to the decline in volume and change in the mix of assets sold.

Expenses

Total expenses for the first nine months of 2014 decreased by $1.5 million, or 34%, as compared to the prior year period. The net decline in expenses was primarily due to decreases in the following: depreciation expense, interest expense, impairment losses, cost reimbursements to AFS, marine vessel maintenance and other operating costs, and franchise tax fees.

The decrease in depreciation expense totaled $708 thousand and was primarily attributable to run-off and sales of lease assets, and an increase in the number of assets that have been fully depreciated since September 30, 2013. Interest expense was lower by $216 thousand as a result of an approximate $4.5 million net decrease in outstanding borrowings since September 30, 2013.

The decline in impairment losses totaled $182 thousand and was a result of a decrease in fair value adjustments to reduce the cost basis of certain impaired off-lease equipment, including certain materials handling equipment and vehicles, based on information and/or pricing quotes from third party remarketing agents. Moreover, costs reimbursed to AFS decreased by $109 thousand largely due to lower costs allocated by the Manager based on the Company’s declining asset base and operations. Marine vessel maintenance and

25

other operating costs declined by $103 thousand due to first quarter 2013 costs of relocating the Fund’s marine vessel to a storage facility at the end of its charter in December 2012. There have been no maintenance costs relative to the Fund’s vessel since the first quarter of 2013. Finally, franchise tax fees declined by $73 thousand due to a period over period reduction in estimated tax liability.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $5.0 million and $4.7 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The liquidity of the Company varies, increasing to the extent cash flows from leases and proceeds of asset sales exceed expenses and decreasing as distributions are made to the Other Members and to the extent expenses exceed cash flows from leases and proceeds from asset sales.

The primary source of liquidity for the Company is its cash flow from leasing activities. As initial lease terms expire, the Company re-leases or sells the equipment. The future liquidity beyond the contractual minimum rentals will depend on the Company’s success in remarketing or selling the equipment as it comes off-rental.

If inflation in the general economy becomes significant, it may affect the Company in as much as the residual (resale) values and rates on re-leases of the Company’s leased assets may increase as the costs of similar assets increase. However, the Company’s revenues from existing leases would not increase; as such leasing rents and payments are generally fixed for the terms of the leases without adjustment for inflation. In addition, if interest rates increase significantly under such circumstances, the lease rates that the Company can obtain on future leases will be expected to increase as the cost of capital is a significant factor in the pricing of lease financing. Leases already in place, for the most part, would not be affected by changes in interest rates.

The Company currently believes it has available adequate reserves to meet its immediate cash requirements and those of the next twelve months, but in the event those reserves were found to be inadequate, the Company would likely be in a position to borrow against its current portfolio to meet such requirements. AFS envisions no such requirements for operating purposes.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth summary cash flow data (in thousands):

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2014				2013				2014				2013
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities		$	1,333			$	1,502			$	4,053			$	4,605
Investing activities			1,004				1,529				4,186				5,113
Financing activities			(2,455	)			(3,035	)			(7,961	)			(9,048	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		$	(118	)		$	(4	)		$	278			$	670

The three months ended September 30, 2014 versus the three months ended September 30, 2013

During the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company’s primary sources of liquidity have been cash flows from its portfolio of operating and direct financing lease contracts, and its investments in notes receivable. In addition, the Company realized $439 thousand and $1.0 million of proceeds from sales or dispositions of equipment and early termination of notes receivable, and the disposition of investment securities during the third quarters of 2014 and 2013, respectively.

During the same respective periods, cash was primarily used to pay distributions to both Other Members and the Managing Member, and to pay down debt. Distributions paid to Members totaled $1.3 million and $2.0 million and cash used to pay down debt totaled $1.2 million and $1.1 million for the respective three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

26

The nine months ended September 30, 2014 versus the nine months ended September 30, 2013

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company’s primary sources of liquidity were cash flows from its portfolio of operating and direct financing lease contracts, and its investments in notes receivable. In addition, the Company realized $2.6 million and $3.7 million of proceeds from sales or dispositions of equipment and early termination of notes receivable, and the disposition of investment securities during the first nine months of 2014 and 2013, respectively.

During the same respective periods, cash was primarily used to pay distributions to both the Other Members and the Managing Member, totaling $4.6 million and $5.9 million. Cash was also used to pay down $3.4 million and $3.2 million of debt during the respective nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013; and, to pay invoices related to management fees and expenses, and other payables.

Non-Recourse Long-Term Debt

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had non-recourse long-term debt totaling $9.7 million and $13.1 million, respectively. Such non-recourse notes payable do not contain any material financial covenants. The notes are secured by a lien granted by the Company to the non-recourse lenders on (and only on) the discounted lease transactions. The lenders have recourse only to the following collateral: the specific leased equipment; the related lease chattel paper; the lease receivables; and proceeds of the foregoing items.

The Operating Agreement limits aggregate borrowings to 50% of the total cost of equipment. For detailed information on the Company’s non-recourse debt obligation, see Note 7 in Item 1. Financial Statements.

Distributions

The Company commenced periodic distributions, based on cash flows from operations, beginning with the month of February 2001. The monthly distributions were discontinued in 2010 as the Company entered its liquidation phase. The rates and frequency of periodic distributions paid by the Fund during its liquidation phase are solely at the discretion of the Manager.

Commitments and Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

Commitments and Contingencies

At September 30, 2014, the Company had no commitments to purchase lease assets or fund investments in notes receivable.

Gain Contingency

ATEL filed a claim on behalf of the Company and certain affiliated entities in Federal court in New Orleans for the under-reporting of revenue by a fleet manager of three marine vessels, seeking to recover an approximate amount of 10% of gross proceeds, which in the aggregate for all affiliated entities represents $2.8 million for the years 2005 – 2007 (of which the Company’s portion is an approximate $350 thousand). The annual allocable portion of the claim is not considered material to the Company in any given year. The trial was concluded during the first week of August 2012. In October 2012, the matter was remitted to the Federal Judge to render a decision on both the law and the facts. The decision of the Court was rendered at the end of June 2013 and the court found in favor of the defendants. The Company filed an appeal of the court’s decision and remained hopeful for a recovery of all or portion of its asserted claims. As a result of the ruling, the defendants filed a claim for legal fees and costs, however, this was denied. Oral arguments for the appeal of the case in substance were heard June 2, 2014, and on June 6, 2014, the Fifth Circuit Appellate Court rendered its decision denying the appeal.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

None.

27

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to customers. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is not permitted. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. The Company evaluated the impact of the new standard on its financial statements and has determined that such impact is virtually non-existent as the new revenue guideline does not affect revenues from leases and loans, which comprise the majority of the Company’s revenues.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014 – 15, Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The new standard provides guidance relative to management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the standard and its operational and related disclosure requirements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, which are based upon historical experiences, market trends and financial forecasts, and upon various other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances and at that certain point in time. Actual results may differ, significantly at times, from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Company’s critical accounting policies are described in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. There have been no material changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies since December 31, 2013.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

The Company’s Managing Member’s President and Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer (“Management”), evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, Management concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Company does not control the financial reporting process, and is solely dependent on the Management of the Managing Member, who is responsible for providing the Company with financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The Managing Member’s disclosure controls and procedures, as they are applicable to the Company, means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

28

Changes in internal control

There were no changes in the Managing Member’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company, during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Managing Member’s internal control over financial reporting, as it is applicable to the Company.

29

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

In the ordinary course of conducting business, there may be certain claims, suits, and complaints filed against the Company. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such matters, if any, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. No material legal proceedings are currently pending against the Company or against any of its assets.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not Applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

Documents filed as a part of this report:

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore have been omitted.

31.1		Certification of Dean L. Cash
31.2		Certification of Paritosh K. Choksi
32.1		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of Dean L. Cash
32.2		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of Paritosh K. Choksi
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

30

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: November 13, 2014

ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND IX, LLC
(Registrant)

				By: ATEL Financial Services, LLC Managing Member of Registrant
By:		/s/ Dean L. Cash Dean L. Cash President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)
By:		/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi Paritosh K. Choksi Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)
By:		/s/ Samuel Schussler Samuel Schussler Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

31