Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive DataFile required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).YES [X] NO [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes [X] No [  ]

On May 21, 2012, there were 2,299,880 outstanding shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $.001 per share.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

- 2 -

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item1. Financial Statements

Hydrodynex, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

March 31, 2012 and 2011

Index to the Financial Statements

- 3 -

- 4 -

Hydrodynex, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

March 31, 2012 and 2011

Notes to the Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 - Organization and Operations

Hydrodynex, Inc. (a development stage company) (“Hydrodynex” or the “Company”) was incorporated on May 12, 2006 under the laws of the State of Nevada for the purpose of the marketing and distribution of AO-System (Anodic Oxidation) water treatment units under an exclusive license agreement for the Territory of North America Comprising United States, Canada and Mexico.

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation– Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.  The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.  Unaudited interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.  These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 and notes thereto contained in the information as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on October 13, 2011.

Development Stage Company

The Company is a development stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  The Company is still devoting substantially all of its efforts on establishing the business and its planned principal operations have not commenced.  All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the fair value of financial instruments; the carrying value, recoverability and impairment, if any, of long-lived assets, including the values assigned to and the estimated useful lives of office equipment, income tax rate and related income tax provision and valuation allowance of deferred tax assets; foreign currency exchange rate and the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern.  Those significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to those estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly reviews its estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such reviews, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

- 7 -

Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include office equipment is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets.  Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable.  If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.

The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes.  The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss).

Fiscal Year

The Company elected June 30 as its fiscal year ending date upon formation.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Office Equipment

Office equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized.  Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of office equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the assets estimated useful life of five (5) years.  Upon sale or retirement of office equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in statements of operations.

Prepaid Patent Application Costs

The Company has adopted the guidelines as set out in paragraph 350-30-25-3 and paragraph 350-30-35-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for prepaid patent application costs.  Under the requirements as set out in paragraph 350-30-25-3 and paragraph 350-30-35-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company capitalizes and amortizes patent application costs associated with the licensed product the Company intends to sell pursuant to the Exclusive License Agreement, entered into on September 3, 2007, over their remaining legal lives, estimated useful lives, or the term of the contract, whichever is shorter.  All internally developed process costs incurred to the point when a patent application is to be filed are expensed as incurred and classified as research and development costs.  Patent application costs, generally legal costs, thereafter incurred, are capitalized pending disposition of the individual patent application, and are subsequently either amortized based on the initial patent life granted, generally fifteen (15) to twenty (20) years for domestic patents and five (5) to twenty (20) years for foreign patents, or expensed if the patent application is rejected.  The costs of defending and maintaining patents are expensed as incurred.  Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.

- 8 -

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include a. affiliates of the Company; b.  entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c.  trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d.  principal owners of the Company; e.  management of the Company; f.  other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g.  other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include:  a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved b.  description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur.  The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment.  In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.  Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

Revenue Recognition

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned less estimated future doubtful accounts.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company will derive its revenue from sales contracts with customers with revenues being generated upon the shipment of goods upon the Company commencing operations.  Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via invoice, product delivery is evidenced by warehouse shipping log as well as a signed bill of lading from the trucking company or third party carrier and title transfers upon shipment, based on free on board (“FOB”) warehouse; the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the purchase order and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive.

- 9 -

Foreign Currency Transactions

The Company applies the guidelines as set out in Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Section 830-20-35) for foreign currency transactions.  Pursuant to Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, foreign currency transactions are transactions denominated in a currency other than U.S. Dollar, the Company’s functional currency.  Foreign currency transactions may produce receivables or payables that are fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that will be received or paid.  A change in exchange rates between the functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated increases or decreases the expected amount of functional currency cash flows upon settlement of the transaction.  That increase or decrease in expected functional currency cash flows is a foreign currency transaction gain or loss that generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the exchange rate changes. Likewise, a transaction gain or loss (measured from the transaction date or the most recent intervening balance sheet date, whichever is later) realized upon settlement of a foreign currency transaction generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the transaction is settled.  The exceptions to this requirement for inclusion in net income of transaction gains and losses pertain to certain intercompany transactions and to transactions that are designated as, and effective as, economic hedges of net investments and foreign currency commitments.  Pursuant to Section 830-20-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the following shall apply to all foreign currency transactions of an enterprise and its investees: (a) At the date the transaction is recognized, each asset, liability, revenue, expense, gain, or loss arising from the transaction shall be measured and recorded in the functional currency of the recording entity by use of the exchange rate in effect at that date as defined in section 830-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification; and (b) At each balance sheet date, recorded balances that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the recording entity shall be adjusted to reflect the current exchange rate.

Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services

The Company accounts for its stock based compensation in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 718-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.  The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

- 10 -

The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).

Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.  The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

- 11 -

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-30-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under paragraph 710-10-30-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”).  Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.  The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.

- 12 -

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the interim period ended March  31, 2012 or 2011.

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to paragraph of 260-10-45-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options and warrants.

The following table shows number of potentially outstanding dilutive shares excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per share calculation for the interim periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 as they were anti-dilutive:

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company has adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.

Subsequent Events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued.  Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

- 13 -

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05

In June 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 “Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”), which was the result of a joint project with the IASB and amends the guidance in ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income (OCI) in the statement of stockholders’ equity. Instead, the new guidance now gives entities the option to present all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity either as a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or as two separate but consecutive statements. Regardless of whether an entity chooses to present comprehensive income in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements, the amendments require entities to present all reclassification adjustments from OCI to net income on the face of the statement of comprehensive income.

The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively and are effective for public entity for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08

In September 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08 “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other: Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 2011-08”). This Update is to simplify how public and nonpublic entities test goodwill for impairment. The amendments permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. Under the amendments in this Update, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount.

The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-10

In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-10 “Property, Plant and Equipment: Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate-a Scope Clarification” (“ASU 2011-09”). This Update is to resolve the diversity in practice as to how financial statements have been reflecting circumstances when parent company reporting entities cease to have controlling financial interests in subsidiaries that are in substance real estate, where the situation arises as a result of default on nonrecourse debt of the subsidiaries.

The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2012 for public entities. Early adoption is permitted.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11

In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS.

The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods.

FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12

In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12 “Comprehensive Income:  Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05” (“ASU 2011-12”). This Update is a deferral of the effective date pertaining to reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income in ASU 2011-05. FASB is to going to reassess the costs and benefits of those provisions in ASU 2011-05 related to reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. Due to the time required to properly make such a reassessment and to evaluate alternative

- 14 -

presentation formats, the FASB decided that it is necessary to reinstate the requirements for the presentation of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income that were in place before the issuance of Update 2011-05.

All other requirements in Update 2011-05 are not affected by this Update, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.

Other Recently Issued, but Not Yet Effective Accounting Pronouncements

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note 3 – Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had a deficit accumulated during the development stage at March 31, 2012 and had a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the interim period then ended, respectively, with no revenues earned since inception. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 4 – Office Equipment

Office equipment, stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation at March 31, 2012 and June 30, 2011 consisted of the following:

Depreciation expense for the interim periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was $258 and $194, respectively.

Note 5 – Exclusive Technology License

- 15 -

last day of the quarter provided the Company exercises its right to manufacture or assemble AO-Systems.  In the event the Company does not manufacture or assemble AO-Systems, the Company pays no royalty on finished units purchased from GRANTOR and resold to customers of the Company, the license fees will no longer be considered prepaid royalties   and the Company will amortize prepaid royalties over the remaining legal life of the patent of AO System, or estimated useful life, or the term of the contract, whichever is shorter in the event that the Company decides not to manufacture or assemble AO-System.

The Company’s exclusive license right to sell finished AO Units in the territory is contingent upon the Company achieving minimum annual sales volume as defined in Table 1 of Appendix B of this Agreement among other terms and conditions at the end of each business year, beginning with the third (3^rd) anniversary after the effective date of this Agreement.  In the event the objectives defined in years three (3) through five (5) of Table 1 in Appendix B are not attained at the end of each business year, this agreement shall, at the option of the GRANTOR, automatically revert to a non-exclusive marketing agreement and the Company will no longer have the right in manufacturing or assembling of AO Systems.

The Company determined that the (iii) payment required under the exclusive license agreement upon approval of U.S. EPA is a contractual liability instead of contingent liability as the AO system has been certified and approved by the European Union for selling on a commercial basis in Europe and the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s certification and approval for selling on a commercial basis in the United States is a matter of procedure and recorded deferred license fees and related license fees payable of $68,175, €50,000 measured in U.S. Dollar at September 3, 2007, the transaction date upon signing of the Exclusive License Agreement.

The Company paid the first installment of €10,000 with $14,892 on December 17, 2007 and the second installment of €20,000 due on November 30, 2008 and paid $26,486 on January 26, 2009, respectively.  The due date for the third installment of €20,000 is undeterminable pending on EPA approval.

The Company determined that since it is currently unable to secure EPA approval of the AO-System in order to begin selling in the United States within the time period specified in the agreement, the agreement has reverted to a non-exclusive marketing agreement.  Consequently, the Company has impaired the entire balance of $68,175 of the deferred licensing fee on June 30, 2010.  

Note 6 – Stockholders’ Deficit

Shares Authorized

Upon formation the aggregate number of shares which the Company shall have authority to issue is eighty million (80,000,000) shares, consisting of two classes to be designated, respectively, “Common Stock” and “Preferred Stock,” with all of such shares having a par value of $.001 per share.  The total number of shares of Preferred Stock that the Company shall have authority to issue is five million (5,000,000) shares.  The total number of shares of Common Stock that the Company shall have authority to issue is seventy five million (75,000,000) shares.

Common Stock

The Company was incorporated on May 12, 2006.  In May 2006, 200,000 shares of its common stock were sold to the Company’s founder and President at $0.01 per share for $2,000 in cash.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, the Company sold 300,000 shares of its common stock to the Company’s founder and President at $0.01 per share for $3,000 in cash.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share for $100,000 in cash.

On November 25, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a Regulation D, Rule 504 stock sale and entered into a definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $7,500 of its securities through the sale of 15,000 shares of its common stock at $0.50 per share inclusive of a stock warrant to purchase 15,000 shares of its common stock exercisable at $1.00 expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance with Ryan Edington, the brother of Jerod Edington, the Vice-president and Chief Operating Officer of the Company.  The fair value of these warrants granted, estimated on the date of grant, was $3,300, which has been recorded as additional paid-in capital, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

- 16 -

On January 23, 2009, the Company sold 250,000 shares of its common stock at $0.20 per share to Ron Kunisaki, the president of the company, for $50,000 in cash.

On July 25, 2009, pursuant to the Bridge Loan Agreement entered into by Triax Capital Management and Hydrodynex, Inc., dated July 24, 2008, Triax Capital Management exercised the conversion rights of the promissory note at the agreed rate of $0.25 per share. The original loan to the Company was in the amount of $4,000, and the 365 days of interest at 8% per annum of $320, equates to a conversion value of 17,280 shares.

On August 23, 2009, pursuant to the Bridge Loan Agreement entered into by Kyle Drexel and Hydrodynex, Inc., dated August 22, 2008, Mr. Drexel exercised the conversion rights of the promissory note at the agreed rate of $0.25 per share. The original loan to the Company was in the amount of $5,000, and the 365 days of interest at 8% per annum of $400, equates to a conversion value of 21,600 shares.

On September 26, 2009, the Company sold 30,000 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share for $7,500 in cash.

On November 9, 2009, the Company sold 140,000 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share for $35,000 in cash.

On September 30, 2011, the Company converted $16,300 in officer notes payable into 326,000 shares of common stock at $0.05 per share.

On September 30, 2011, the Chief Operating Officer of the company forgave a debt of $275 and was recorded to additional paid in capital..

Stock Option Plan

On May 19, 2006, the Company’s board of directors approved the adoption of the “2006 Non-Qualified Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan” (“2006 Plan”) by unanimous consent.  The 2006 Plan was initiated to encourage and enable officers, directors, consultants, advisors and key employees of the Company to acquire and retain a proprietary interest in the Company by ownership of its common stock.  A total of 1,000,000 of the authorized shares of the Company’s common stock may be subject to, or issued pursuant to, the terms of the plan.  The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.  Additionally, the Company’s policy is to issue new shares of common stock to satisfy stock option exercises.

On June 30, 2008, the Board of Director of the Company approved and granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of 85,000 shares of its common stock, par value $.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) at $0.25 per share expiring on June 30, 2013, five (5) years from the date of issuance, vested upon issuance.

On November 21, 2008, an officer and director of the Company resigned and surrendered his outstanding stock option to purchase 15,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Company.

The fair value of each option grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

The fair value of the stock options issued in June 2008 under the 2006 Plan using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model was $4,250 at the date of grant, all of which have being recognized as stock based compensation and so included in the statements of operations upon issuance.

For the interim period ended March 31, 2012, the Company did not grant any stock options nor record any stock-based compensation.

- 17 -

The table below summarizes the Company’s stock option activity through March 31, 2012:

The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable stock options as of March 31, 2012:

- 18 -

As of March 31, 2012, there were 930,000 shares of stock options remaining available for issuance under the 2006 Plan.

Warrants

(i) Warrants issued in 2008

In connection with the issuance of convertible notes payable issued between July 24, 2008 and August 23, 2008, the Company issued warrants to purchase 12,000 shares of its common stock in aggregate to the note holder with an exercise price of $1.00 per share and expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance, all of which have been earned upon issuance. The Company determined the fair value of the warrants issued was $2,640 using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model.  These warrants all expired, unexercised, during the period ending March 31, 2012.

In connection with the sale of 15,000 shares of its common stock on November 25, 2008, the Company issued warrants to purchase 15,000 shares of its common stock to the investor with an exercise price of $1.00 per share and expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance, all of which have been earned upon issuance. Company determined the fair value of the warrants issued was $3,300 using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. These warrants all expired, unexercised, during the period ending December 31, 2011.

(ii) Warrants issued in 2011

On September 30, 2011, the Company converted $37,600 in accrued expenses - officer into warrants to purchase 752,000 shares of its common stock exercisable at $0.01 per share and expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance.  The Company valued these warrants issued at $30,080 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and recorded both (1) the fair value of warrants of $30,080 and (2) the difference between the fair value of warrants and accrued expenses – officer, the forgiveness of debt from officer of $7,520 as additional paid-in capital.

On September 30, 2011, the Company converted $8,385 in accounts payable into warrants to purchase 167,700 shares of its common stock exercisable at $0.01 per share and expiring thee (3) years from the date of issuance.  The Company valued these warrants issued at $6,708 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and recorded (1) the fair value of warrants of $6,708 as additional paid-in capital and (2) the difference between the fair value of warrants and accounts payable of $1,677 as the forgiveness of debt.

The fair value of each warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

The table below summarizes the Company’s warrants activity though March 31, 2012:

- 19 -