Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive DataFile required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  YES [X] NO [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  YES [X] NO [  ]

On August 21, 2013, there were 2,844,880 outstanding shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $.001 per share.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

- 2 -

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item1. Financial Statements

Hydrodynex, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

August 31, 2013 and 2012

Index to the Financial Statements

- 3 -

- 4 -

- 5 -

- 6 -

Hydrodynex, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

August 31, 2013 and 2012

Notes to the Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 - Organization and Operations

Hydrodynex, Inc. (a development stage company) (“Hydrodynex” or the “Company”) was incorporated on May 12, 2006 under the laws of the State of Nevada for the purpose of the marketing and distribution of AO-System (Anodic Oxidation) water treatment units under an exclusive license agreement for the Territory of North America comprising the United States, Canada and Mexico.

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.  The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.  Unaudited interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.  These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013 and notes thereto contained in the information as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 30, 2013.

Development Stage Company

The Company is a development stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  The Company is still devoting substantially all of its efforts on establishing the business and its planned principal operations have not commenced.  All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the fair value of financial instruments; the carrying value, recoverability and impairment, if any, of long-lived assets, including the values assigned to and the estimated useful lives of office equipment, income tax rate, income tax provision and valuation allowance of deferred tax assets; foreign currency exchange rate and the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern.  Those significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to those estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly reviews its estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such reviews, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification

- 7 -

(“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels.  The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, and license fee payable, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Fiscal Year

The Company elected June 30 as its fiscal year ending date upon formation.  

On December 21, 2012, a board resolution authorized the change of the Company’s fiscal year end date from June 30 to May 31.  In connection with the change in its fiscal year end, the Company filed its Transition Report which covered the 11 month period beginning July 1, 2012 and ending May 31, 2013 and the historical activities of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include a. affiliates of the Company; b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include:  a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no

- 8 -

amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur.  The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment.  In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements.  If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.  Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies.  Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

Revenue Recognition

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned less estimated future doubtful accounts.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company will derive its revenue from sales contracts with customers with revenues being generated upon the shipment of goods upon the Company commencing operations.  Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via invoice, product delivery is evidenced by warehouse shipping log as well as a signed bill of lading from the trucking company or third party carrier and title transfers upon shipment, based on free on board (“FOB”) warehouse; the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the purchase order and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive.

Foreign Currency Transactions

The Company applies the guidelines as set out in Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Section 830-20-35) for foreign currency transactions.  Pursuant to Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, foreign currency transactions are transactions denominated in a currency other than U.S. Dollar, the Company’s functional currency.  Foreign currency transactions may produce receivables or payables that are fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that will be received or paid.  A change in exchange rates between the functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated increases or decreases the expected amount of functional currency cash flows upon settlement of the transaction.  That increase or decrease in expected functional currency cash flows is a foreign currency transaction gain or loss that generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the exchange rate changes. Likewise, a transaction gain or loss (measured from the transaction date or the most recent intervening balance sheet date, whichever is later) realized upon settlement of a foreign currency transaction generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the transaction is settled.  The exceptions to this requirement for inclusion in net income of transaction gains and losses pertain to certain intercompany transactions and to transactions that are designated as, and effective as, economic hedges of net investments and foreign currency commitments.  Pursuant to Section 830-20-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the following shall apply to all foreign currency transactions of an enterprise and its investees: (a) At the date the transaction is recognized, each asset, liability,

- 9 -

revenue, expense, gain, or loss arising from the transaction shall be measured and recorded in the functional currency of the recording entity by use of the exchange rate in effect at that date as defined in section 830-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification; and (b) At each balance sheet date, recorded balances that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the recording entity shall be adjusted to reflect the current exchange rate.

Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services

The Company accounts for its stock based compensation in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 718-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.  If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.  The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

- 10 -

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).

Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.  If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.  The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

- 11 -

instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a share option and similar instrument that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-30-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.

Income Tax Provision

The Company follows paragraph 740-10-30-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Paragraph 740-10-25-13.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the interim period ended August 31, 2013 or 2012.

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to paragraph of 260-10-45-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options and warrants.

The following table shows number of potentially outstanding dilutive shares excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per share calculation as they were anti-dilutive:

- 12 -

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company has adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.

Subsequent Events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued.  Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, "Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities". This ASU clarifies that the scope of ASU No. 2011-11, "Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities." applies only to derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse purchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with specific criteria contained in FASB Accounting Standards Codification or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income." The ASUadds new disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component and their corresponding effect on net income. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013.

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued ASU No. 2013-04, "Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date." This ASU addresses the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of certain obligations resulting from joint and several arrangements including debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, "Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity." This ASU addresses the accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment when a parent either

- 13 -

sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. The guidance outlines the events when cumulative translation adjustments should be released into net income and is intended by FASB to eliminate some disparity in current accounting practice. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting.” The amendments require an entity to prepare its financial statements using the liquidation basis of accounting when liquidation is imminent. Liquidation is imminent when the likelihood is remote that the entity will return from liquidation and either (a) a plan for liquidation is approved by the person or persons with the authority to make such a plan effective and the likelihood is remote that the execution of the plan will be blocked by other parties or (b) a plan for liquidation is being imposed by other forces (for example, involuntary bankruptcy). If a plan for liquidation was specified in the entity’s governing documents from the entity’s inception (for example, limited-life entities), the entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting only if the approved plan for liquidation differs from the plan for liquidation that was specified at the entity’s inception. The amendments require financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting to present relevant information about an entity’s expected resources in liquidation by measuring and presenting assets at the amount of the expected cash proceeds from liquidation. The entity should include in its presentation of assets any items it had not previously recognized under U.S. GAAP but that it expects to either sell in liquidation or use in settling liabilities (for example, trademarks). The amendments are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. Entities should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent. Early adoption is permitted.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements

Note 3 – Going Concern

The financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the financial statements, the Company had a deficit accumulated during the development stage at August 31, 2013 and had a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the interim period then ended.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 4 – Exclusive Technology License

- 14 -

The Company’s exclusive license right to sell finished AO Units in the territory is contingent upon the Company achieving minimum annual sales volume as defined in Table 1 of Appendix B of this Agreement among other terms and conditions at the end of each business year, beginning with the third (3^rd) anniversary after the effective date of this Agreement.  In the event the objectives defined in years three (3) through five (5) of Table 1 in Appendix B are not attained at the end of each business year, this agreement shall, at the option of the GRANTOR, automatically revert to a non-exclusive marketing agreement and the Company will no longer have the right in manufacturing or assembling of AO Systems.

The Company determined that the (iii) payment required under the exclusive license agreement upon approval of U.S. EPA is a contractual liability instead of contingent liability as the AO system has been certified and approved by the European Union for selling on a commercial basis in Europe and the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s certification and approval for selling on a commercial basis in the United States is a matter of procedure and recorded deferred license fees and related license fees payable of $68,175, €50,000 measured in U.S. Dollar at September 3, 2007, the transaction date upon signing of the Exclusive License Agreement.

The Company paid the first installment of €10,000 with $14,892 on December 17, 2007 and the second installment of €20,000 due on November 30, 2008 was paid with $26,486 on January 26, 2009.  The due date for the third installment of €20,000 is undeterminable pending on EPA approval.

The Company determined that since it is currently unable to secure EPA approval of the AO-System in order to begin selling in the United States within the time period specified in the agreement, the agreement has reverted to a non-exclusive marketing agreement.  Consequently, the Company impaired the entire balance of $68,175 of the deferred licensing fee on June 30, 2010.

Note 5 – Stockholders’ Deficit

Shares Authorized

Upon formation the aggregate number of shares which the Company shall have authority to issue is eighty million (80,000,000) shares, consisting of two classes to be designated, respectively, “Common Stock” and “Preferred Stock,” with all of such shares having a par value of $.001 per share.  The total number of shares of Preferred Stock that the Company shall have authority to issue is five million (5,000,000) shares.  The total number of shares of Common Stock that the Company shall have authority to issue is seventy five million (75,000,000) shares.

Common Stock

The Company was incorporated on May 12, 2006.  In May 2006, 200,000 shares of its common stock were sold to the Company’s founder and President at $0.01 per share for $2,000 in cash.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, the Company sold 300,000 shares of its common stock to the Company’s founder and President at $0.01 per share for $3,000 in cash.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share for $100,000 in cash.

On November 25, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a Regulation D, Rule 504 stock sale and entered into a definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $7,500 of its securities through the sale of 15,000 shares of its common stock at $0.50 per share inclusive of a stock warrant to purchase 15,000 shares of its common stock exercisable at $1.00 expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance with Ryan Edington, the brother of Jerod Edington, the Vice-president and Chief Operating Officer of the Company.  The fair value of these warrants granted, estimated on the date of grant, was $3,300, which has been recorded as additional paid-in capital, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

On January 23, 2009, the Company sold 250,000 shares of its common stock at $0.20 per share to Ron Kunisaki, the then president of the company, for $50,000 in cash.

On July 25, 2009, pursuant to the Bridge Loan Agreement entered into by an entity and Hydrodynex, Inc., dated July 24, 2008, Triax Capital Management exercised the conversion rights of the promissory note at the agreed rate of $0.25 per share. The

- 15 -

original loan to the Company was in the amount of $4,000, and the 365 days of interest at 8% per annum of $320, equates to a conversion value of 17,280 shares.

On August 23, 2009, pursuant to the Bridge Loan Agreement entered into by a non-affiliated individual and Hydrodynex, Inc., dated August 22, 2008, the loaner exercised the conversion rights of the promissory note at the agreed rate of $0.25 per share. The original loan to the Company was in the amount of $5,000, and the 365 days of interest at 8% per annum of $400, equates to a conversion value of 21,600 shares.

On September 26, 2009, the Company sold 30,000 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share for $7,500 in cash.

On November 9, 2009, the Company sold 140,000 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share for $35,000 in cash.

On September 30, 2011, the Company converted $16,300 in advances from an officer into 326,000 shares of common stock at $0.05 per share.

On September 30, 2011, the Chief Operating Officer of the company forgave a debt of $275 which was recorded as additional paid in capital.

On August 30, 2013, two creditors of the Company converted their loans due in the aggregate of $27,250 into common shares of the Company at $0.05 per share.  A total of 545,000 shares were issued in exchange for the loans

Stock Option Plan

On May 19, 2006, the Company’s board of directors approved the adoption of the “2006 Non-Qualified Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan” (“2006 Plan”) by unanimous consent.  The 2006 Plan was initiated to encourage and enable officers, directors, consultants, advisors and key employees of the Company to acquire and retain a proprietary interest in the Company by ownership of its common stock.  A total of 1,000,000 of the authorized shares of the Company’s common stock may be subject to, or issued pursuant to, the terms of the plan.  The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.  Additionally, the Company’s policy is to issue new shares of common stock to satisfy stock option exercises.

On June 30, 2008, the Board of Director of the Company approved and granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of 85,000 shares of its common stock, par value $.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) at $0.25 per share expired on June 30, 2013, five (5) years from the date of issuance, vested upon issuance.  On November 21, 2008, an officer and director of the Company resigned and surrendered his outstanding stock option to purchase 15,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Company.  The remaining 70,000 stock options all expired on June 30, 2013.

The fair value of each option grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

The fair value of the stock options issued in June 2008 under the 2006 Plan using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model was $4,250 at the date of grant, all of which have being recognized as stock based compensation and so included in the statements of operations upon issuance.

For the three months ended August 31, 2013, the Company did not grant any stock options nor record any stock-based compensation.

The table below summarizes the Company’s stock option activity through August 31, 2013:

- 16 -

There are no outstanding and exercisable stock options as of August 31, 2013:

As of August 31, 2013, there were 930,000 shares of stock options remaining available for issuance under the 2006 Plan.

Warrants

(i) Warrants issued in 2008

In connection with the issuance of convertible notes payable issued between July 24, 2008 and August 23, 2008, the Company issued warrants to purchase 12,000 shares of its common stock in aggregate to the note holder with an exercise price of $1.00 per share, expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance, all of which have been earned upon issuance.  The Company

- 17 -

determined the fair value of the warrants issued was $2,640 using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model.  These warrants all expired, unexercised, during the year ending June 30, 2012.

In connection with the sale of 15,000 shares of its common stock on November 25, 2008, the Company issued warrants to purchase 15,000 shares of its common stock to the investor with an exercise price of $1.00 per share and expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance, all of which have been earned upon issuance.  The Company determined the fair value of the warrants issued was $3,300 using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model.  These warrants all expired, unexercised, during the period ending December 31, 2011.

(ii) Warrants issued in 2011

On September 30, 2011, the Company converted $37,600 in accrued expenses - officer into warrants to purchase 752,000 shares of its common stock exercisable at $0.01 per share and expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance.  The Company valued these warrants issued at $30,080 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and recorded both (i) the fair value of warrants of $30,080 and (ii) the difference between the fair value of warrants and accrued expenses – officer, the forgiveness of debt from officer of $7,520 as additional paid-in capital.

On September 30, 2011, the Company converted $8,385 in accounts payable into warrants to purchase 167,700 shares of its common stock exercisable at $0.01 per share, expiring thee (3) years from the date of issuance.  The Company valued these warrants issued at $6,708 on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, and recorded (1) the fair value of warrants of $6,708 as additional paid-in capital and (2) the difference between the fair value of warrants and accounts payable of $1,677 forgiveness of debt.

The fair value of each warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

(Remainder of Page left intentionally blank)

- 18 -

The table below summarizes the Company’s warrants activity though August 31, 2013: