Attached files

file filename
EX-31.2 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CFO - CenterState Bank Corpdex312.htm
EX-23.1 - CONSENT OF CROWE HORWATH LLP - CenterState Bank Corpdex231.htm
EX-32.2 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CFO - CenterState Bank Corpdex322.htm
EX-21.1 - SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT - CenterState Bank Corpdex211.htm
EX-10.8 - SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT - CenterState Bank Corpdex108.htm
EX-32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CEO - CenterState Bank Corpdex321.htm
EX-10.9 - SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT - CenterState Bank Corpdex109.htm
EX-31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CEO - CenterState Bank Corpdex311.htm
EX-10.10 - EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - CenterState Bank Corpdex1010.htm
EX-10.11 - EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - CenterState Bank Corpdex1011.htm
Table of Contents

 

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

 

 

 

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 000-32017

 

 

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC.

(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Florida   59-3606741

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

42745 U.S. Highway 27, Davenport, Florida   33837
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

Issuer’s telephone number, including area code:

(863) 419-7750

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

 

The registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    YES ¨    NO x

The registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    YES ¨    NO x

Check whether the issuer has (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES x    NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES x    NO ¨

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation SK contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of issuer’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer  ¨   Accelerated filer  x
Non-accelerated filer  ¨   Smaller reporting company  ¨

The registrant is a shell company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.    YES ¨    NO x

The aggregate market value of the Common Stock of the issuer held by non-affiliates of the issuer (20,948,695 shares) on June 30, 2010, was approximately $211,372,000. The aggregate market value was computed by reference the last sale of the Common Stock of the issuer at $10.09 per share on June 30, 2010. For the purposes of this response, directors, executive officers and holders of 5% or more of the issuer’s Common Stock are considered the affiliates of the issuer at that date.

As of March 1, 2011 there were outstanding 30,027,341 shares of the issuer’s Common Stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 28, 2011 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the issuer’s fiscal year end are incorporated by reference into Part III, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

          Page  

PART I

     1   

Item 1.

  

Business

     1   
  

General

     1   
  

Note about Forward-Looking Statements

     2   
  

Lending Activities

     2   
  

Deposit Activities

     4   
  

Investments

     4   
  

Correspondent Banking

     5   
  

Data Processing

     5   
  

Effect of Governmental Policies

     5   
  

Interest and Usury

     5   
  

Supervision and Regulation

     6   
  

Competition

     13   
  

Employees

     13   
  

Statistical Profile and Other Financial Data

     13   
  

Availability of Reports furnished or filed with SEC

     13   

Item 1A.

  

Risk Factors

     13   

Item 1B.

  

Unresolved Staff Comments

     22   

Item 2.

  

Properties

     22   

Item 3.

  

Legal Proceedings

     22   

Item 4.

  

[Removed and Reserved]

     22   

PART II

     23   

Item 5.

  

Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

     23   

Item 6.

  

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

     25   

Item 7.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     27   

Item 7A.

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks

     66   

Item 8.

  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

     66   

Item 9.

  

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

     66   

Item 9A.

  

Controls and Procedures

     67   

Item 9B.

  

Other Information

     67   

PART III

     68   

Item 10.

  

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

     68   

Item 11.

  

Executive Compensation

     68   

Item 12.

  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

     68   

Item 13.

  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

     68   

Item 14.

  

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

     68   

Item 15.

  

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

     68   

SIGNATURES

     120   

EXHIBIT INDEX

     121   


Table of Contents

PART I

 

Item 1. Business

General

CenterState Banks, Inc. (“We,” “CenterState,” “CSFL,” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida on September 20, 1999. CenterState is a registered bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHC Act”) and owns all the outstanding shares of CenterState Bank of Florida, N.A. (“CSB”), Valrico State Bank (“VSB”) (collectively, the “Banks”), and R4ALL, Inc. (“R4ALL”) a non bank subsidiary.

The Company was formed and commenced operations by acquiring CenterState Bank Central Florida, N.A. (“Central”), CenterState Bank, N.A. (“CSNA”) and First National Bank of Polk County (“FNB/Polk”) in June of 2000. Central and CSNA commenced operations in 1989. FNB/Polk commenced operations in 1992.

CSB commenced operations in April of 2000 and was acquired by the Company on December 31, 2002. In January 2006, FNB/Polk was merged with CSB.

The Company purchased CenterState Bank Mid Florida in March of 2006 and merged it with CSNA in November of 2007. In April of 2007 we purchased VSB. In December 2010 Central and CSNA were merged into CSB.

In September 2009 we formed a separate non bank subsidiary, R4ALL, for the purpose of acquisition and disposition of troubled assets from our subsidiary banks.

Through our lead bank, CSB, we acquired assets and deposits from four failed financial institutions from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) in 2009 and 2010.

In January 2011, we acquired four branch banking offices with approximately $113 million of deposits and approximately $121 million of performing loans from TD Bank, N.A.

Headquartered in Davenport, Florida between Orlando and Tampa, we provide a range of consumer and commercial banking services to individuals, businesses and industries through our 53 bank branch network located within fourteen counties throughout central Florida. We currently have bank branch locations in the following Florida counties:

 

Citrus    Indian River    Orange    Polk
Hendry    Lake    Osceola    Putnam
Hernando    Marion    Pasco    Sumter
Hillsborough    Okeechobee      

The basic services we offer include: demand interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing accounts, money market deposit accounts, time deposits, safe deposit services, cash management, direct deposits, notary services, money orders, night depository, travelers’ checks, cashier’s checks, domestic collections, savings bonds, bank drafts, automated teller services, drive-in tellers, and banking by mail and by internet. In addition, we make residential and commercial real estate loans, secured and unsecured commercial loans and consumer loans. Our banks provide automated teller machine (ATM) cards, thereby permitting customers to utilize the convenience of larger ATM networks. We also offer internet banking services to our customers. In addition to the foregoing services, our offices provide customers with extended banking hours. We do not have a trust department, however, trust services are available to customers through a business relationship with another institution. We also offer other financial products to our customers, including mutual funds, annuities and other products, through a relationship with Infinex Investment, Inc.

 

1


Table of Contents

The revenue of our Company is primarily derived from interest on, and fees received in connection with, real estate and other loans, interest and dividends from investment securities and short-term investments, and commissions on bond sales. The principal sources of funds for our lending activities are customer deposits, repayment of loans, and the sale and maturity of investment securities. Our principal expenses are interest paid on deposits, and operating and general administrative expenses.

In addition to providing traditional deposit and lending products and services to our commercial and retail customers through our 53 locations in central Florida, we also operate a correspondent banking and bond sales division. The division is integrated with and part of our lead subsidiary bank, CSB, located in Winter Haven, Florida, although the majority of our bond salesmen, traders and operations personnel are physically housed in leased facilities located in Birmingham, Alabama and Atlanta, Georgia. The business lines of this division are primarily divided into three inter-related revenue generating activities. The first, and largest, revenue generator is commissions earned on fixed income security sales. The second category includes: (a) correspondent bank deposits (i.e., federal funds purchased) and (b) correspondent bank checking accounts. The third, and smallest revenue generating category, includes fees from safe-keeping activities, bond accounting services for correspondents, and asset/liability consulting related activities. The customer base includes small to medium size financial institutions primarily located in Florida, Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia.

As is the case with banking institutions generally, our operations are materially and significantly influenced by the real estate market, general economic conditions and by related monetary and fiscal policies of financial institution regulatory agencies, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). Deposit flows and costs of funds are influenced by interest rates on competing investments and general market rates of interest. Lending activities are affected by the demand for financing of real estate and other types of loans, which in turn is affected by the interest rates at which such financing may be offered and other factors affecting local demand and availability of funds. We face strong competition in the attraction of deposits (our primary source of lendable funds) and in the origination of loans. See “Competition.”

At December 31, 2010, our primary assets were our ownership of 100% of the stock of our subsidiary banks. At December 31, 2010, we had total consolidated assets of $2,063,319,000, total consolidated deposits of $1,685,594,000, and total consolidated stockholders’ equity of $252,644,000.

Note about Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, such as statements relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business operations. These statements relate to expectations concerning matters that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views and expectations based largely upon the information currently available to us and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. Although we believe our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, they are not guarantees of future performance and there are a number of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. By making these forward-looking statements, we do not undertake to update them in any manner except as may be required by our disclosure obligations in filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Federal securities laws. Our actual results may differ materially from our forward-looking statements.

Lending Activities

We offer a range of lending services, including real estate, consumer and commercial loans, to individuals and small businesses and other organizations that are located in or conduct a substantial portion of their business in our market area. Our consolidated loans at December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $1,129,946,000, or 55% and $959,021,000 or 55%, respectively, of total consolidated assets. The interest rates charged on loans vary with the degree of risk, maturity, and amount of the loan, and are further subject to competitive pressures, money market rates, availability of funds, and government regulations. We have no foreign loans or loans for highly leveraged transactions.

 

2


Table of Contents

Our loans are concentrated in three major areas: real estate loans, commercial loans and consumer loans. A majority of our loans are made on a secured basis. As of December 31, 2010, approximately 86% of our consolidated loan portfolio consisted of loans secured by mortgages on real estate, 9% of the loan portfolio consisted of commercial loans (not secured by real estate) and 5% of our loan portfolio consisted of consumer and other loans.

Approximately 17.5% of the Company’s loans, or $198,197,000, are covered by FDIC loss sharing agreements related to the acquisition of three failed financial institutions during the third quarter of 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC is obligated to reimburse the Company for 80% of losses with respect to the covered loans beginning with the first dollar of loss incurred, subject to the terms of the agreements. The Company will reimburse the FDIC for its share of recoveries with respect to the covered loans. The loss sharing agreements applicable to single family residential mortgage loans provide for FDIC loss sharing and the Company reimbursement to the FDIC for recoveries for ten years. The loss sharing agreements applicable to commercial loans provide for FDIC loss sharing for five years and Company reimbursement to the FDIC for a total of eight years for recoveries.

Our real estate loans are secured by mortgages and consist primarily of loans to individuals and businesses for the purchase, improvement of or investment in real estate, for the construction of single-family residential and commercial units, and for the development of single-family residential building lots. These real estate loans may be made at fixed or variable interest rates. Generally, we do not make fixed-rate commercial real estate loans for terms exceeding five years. Loans in excess of five years are generally adjustable. Our residential real estate loans generally are repayable in monthly installments based on up to a 15-year or a 30-year amortization schedule with variable or fixed interest rates.

Our commercial loan portfolio includes loans to individuals and small-to-medium sized businesses located primarily in fourteen central Florida counties listed under “Business” or contiguous counties for working capital, equipment purchases, and various other business purposes. A majority of commercial loans are secured by equipment or similar assets, but these loans may also be made on an unsecured basis. Commercial loans may be made at variable or fixed rates of interest. Commercial lines of credit are typically granted on a one-year basis, with loan covenants and monetary thresholds. Other commercial loans with terms or amortization schedules of longer than one year will normally carry interest rates which vary with the prime lending rate and will become payable in full and are generally refinanced in three to five years. Commercial and agricultural loans not secured by real estate amounted to approximately 9% and 10% of our Company’s total loan portfolio as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Our consumer loan portfolio consists primarily of loans to individuals for various consumer purposes, but includes some business purpose loans which are payable on an installment basis. The majority of these loans are for terms of less than five years and are secured by liens on various personal assets of the borrowers, but consumer loans may also be made on an unsecured basis. Consumer loans are made at fixed and variable interest rates, and are often based on up to a five-year amortization schedule.

For additional information regarding the Company’s loan portfolio, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Loan originations are derived primarily from employee loan officers within our local market areas, but can also be attributed to referrals from existing customers and borrowers, advertising, or walk-in customers.

Certain credit risks are inherent in making loans. These include prepayment risks, risks resulting from uncertainties in the future value of collateral, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions, and risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers. In particular, longer maturities increase the risk that economic conditions will change and adversely affect collectibility. We attempt to minimize credit losses through various means. In particular, on larger credits, we generally rely on the cash flow of a debtor as the source of repayment and secondarily on the value of the underlying collateral. In addition, we attempt to utilize shorter loan terms in order to reduce the risk of a decline in the value of such collateral.

 

3


Table of Contents

Deposit Activities

Deposits are the major source of our funds for lending and other investment activities. We consider the majority of our regular savings, demand, NOW and money market deposit accounts to be core deposits. These accounts comprised approximately 61% and 56% of our consolidated total deposits at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Approximately 39% of our consolidated deposits at December 31, 2010, were certificates of deposit compared to 44% at December 31, 2009. Generally, we attempt to maintain the rates paid on our deposits at a competitive level. Time deposits of $100,000 and over made up approximately 23% of consolidated total deposits at December 31, 2010 and 24% at December 31, 2009. The majority of the deposits are generated from the fourteen central Florida counties listed in the “Business” section. Generally, we do not accept brokered deposits and we do not solicit deposits on a national level. We obtain all of our deposits from customers in our local markets. For additional information regarding the Company’s deposit accounts, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Deposits.”

Investments

Our investment securities portfolio available for sale was $500,927,000 and $463,186,000 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, representing 24% and 26% of our total consolidated assets. At December 31, 2010 approximately 71% of this portfolio was invested in U.S. government mortgage backed securities (“MBS”), specifically residential FNMA, FHLMC, and GNMA MBSs. We do not own any private label MBS. Approximately 22% or $113,416,000 of this portfolio is invested in obligations of U.S. government agencies and government sponsored enterprises, and the remaining 7%, or $33,253,000 is invested in municipal securities. Our investments are managed in relation to loan demand and deposit growth, and are generally used to provide for the investment of excess funds at acceptable risks levels while providing liquidity to fund increases in loan demand or to offset fluctuations in deposits. Investment securities available for sale are recorded on our balance sheet at market value at each balance sheet date. Any change in market value is recorded directly in our stockholders’ equity account and is not recognized in our income statement unless the security is sold or unless it is impaired and the impairment is other than temporary. During 2010, we sold approximately $235,273,000 of these securities and recognized in our income statement a net gain on the sales of approximately $7,034,000.

We have selected these types of investments because such securities generally represent a minimal investment risk. Occasionally, we may purchase certificates of deposits of national and state banks. These investments may exceed $250,000 in any one institution (the limit of FDIC insurance for deposit accounts). Federal funds sold, money market accounts and interest bearing deposits held at the Federal Reserve Bank represent the excess cash we have available over and above daily cash needs. Federal funds sold and money market funds are invested on an overnight basis with approved correspondent banks.

We monitor changes in financial markets. In addition to investments for our portfolio, we monitor daily cash positions to ensure that all available funds earn interest at the earliest possible date. A portion of the investment account is invested in liquid securities that can be readily converted to cash with minimum risk of market loss. These investments usually consist of obligations of U.S. government agencies, mortgage backed securities and federal funds. The remainder of the investment account may be placed in investment securities of different type and/or longer maturity. Daily surplus funds are sold in the federal funds market for one business day. We attempt to stagger the maturities of our securities so as to produce a steady cash-flow in the event cash is needed, or economic conditions change.

We also have a trading securities portfolio managed at our lead subsidiary bank. For this portfolio, realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in trading securities revenue, a component of non interest income in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. Securities purchased for this portfolio have primarily been municipal securities and are held for short periods of time. During 2010 we purchased approximately $304,750,000 of securities for this portfolio and sold $303,147,000 recognizing a net gain on sale of approximately $597,000. At December 31, 2010, we owned approximately $2,225,000 of securities in our trading portfolio, which includes unrealized gains of approximately $25,000.

 

4


Table of Contents

Correspondent Banking

We have a corresponding banking and bond sales business segment which operates as a division within our lead subsidiary bank. Its primary revenue generating activities are as follows: 1) the first, and largest revenue generator, is commissions earned on fixed income security sales; 2) the second category is interest income spread earned on correspondent bank deposits (i.e., federal funds purchased) and correspondent bank checking account deposits; and 3) the third revenue generating category, includes fees from safe-keeping activities, bond accounting services for correspondents, asset/liability consulting related activities, international wires, and other clearing and corporate checking account services. The customer base includes small to medium size financial institutions primarily located in Florida, Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia.

Data Processing

Beginning in December 2007 and ending in February 2008 each of our banks converted their third party core data processing service bureau to a single in-house solution. The core data processing system provides automated general ledgers, deposit processing and accounting services, and loan processing and accounting services. The systems were substantially identical to the third party system, except all the processing now occurs in-house. Each of our subsidiary business units maintains its own data processing system, with its own general ledger, deposit accounting system and loan accounting system, all housed on the same equipment maintained by the Company. The output of each of these comprehensive systems for each of our banks is then consolidated at the holding company level. In September 2010, our lead bank upgraded to an enhanced in-house system. In December 2010, Central and CSNA converted to the upgraded system simultaneously with their merger into the Company’s lead bank. The Company’s remaining subsidiary bank, VSB, is expected to convert to the enhanced system at the end of March 2011.

During 2010, the Company’s lead subsidiary bank acquired three failed financial institutions from the FDIC. Each of these acquired banks have not yet converted and merged their data processing systems into the Company’s lead subsidiary bank. They are each operating a different legacy system, which is causing cost inefficiencies in the short-term. Two of these acquired banks are scheduled to convert next September and the other one in July.

A division of the lead bank also provides item processing services and certain other information technology (“IT”) services for both subsidiary banks and the Company overall. These services include; sorting, encoding, processing, and imaging checks and rendering checking and other deposit statements to commercial and retail customers, as well as provide IT services, including intranet and internet services for each subsidiary bank and the Company overall. The cost of providing these services is charged to VSB based on usage.

Effect of Governmental Policies

The earnings and business of our Company are and will be affected by the policies of various regulatory authorities of the United States, especially the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve, among other things, regulates the supply of credit and deals with general economic conditions within the United States. The instruments of monetary policy employed by the Federal Reserve for these purposes influence in various ways the overall level of investments, loans, other extensions of credit and deposits, and the interest rates paid on liabilities and received on assets.

Interest and Usury

Our Company is subject to numerous state and federal statutes that affect the interest rates that may be charged on loans. These laws do not, under present market conditions, deter us from continuing the process of originating loans.

 

5


Table of Contents

Supervision and Regulation

Banks and their holding companies, and many of their affiliates, are extensively regulated under both federal and state law. The following is a brief summary of certain statutes, rules, and regulations affecting our Company, and our subsidiary Banks. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions referred to below and is not intended to be an exhaustive description of the statutes or regulations applicable to the business of our Company and subsidiary Banks. Supervision, regulation, and examination of banks by regulatory agencies are intended primarily for the protection of depositors, rather than shareholders.

Bank Holding Company Regulation. Our Company is a bank holding company, registered with the Federal Reserve under the BHC Act. As such, we are subject to the supervision, examination and reporting requirements of the BHC Act and the regulations of the Federal Reserve. The BHC Act requires that a bank holding company obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before (i) acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any bank, (ii) taking any action that causes a bank to become a subsidiary of the bank holding company, or (iii) merging or consolidating with any other bank holding company.

The BHC Act further provides that the Federal Reserve may not approve any transaction that would result in a monopoly or would be in furtherance of any combination or conspiracy to monopolize or attempt to monopolize the business of banking in any section of the United States, or the effect of which may be substantially to lessen competition or to tend to create a monopoly in any section of the country, or that in any other manner would be in restraint of trade, unless the anticompetitive effects of the proposed transaction are clearly outweighed by the public interest in meeting the convenience and needs of the community to be served. The Federal Reserve is also required to consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the bank holding companies and banks concerned and the convenience, and needs of the community to be served. Consideration of financial resources generally focuses on capital adequacy and consideration of convenience and needs issues includes the parties’ performance under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (the “CRA”), both of which are discussed below.

Banks are subject to the provisions of the CRA. Under the terms of the CRA, the appropriate federal bank regulatory agency is required, in connection with its examination of a bank, to assess such bank’s record in meeting the credit needs of the community served by that bank, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The regulatory agency’s assessment of the bank’s record is made available to the public. Further, such assessment is required of any bank which has applied to:

 

   

charter a bank,

 

   

obtain deposit insurance coverage for a newly chartered institution,

 

   

establish a new branch office that will accept deposits,

 

   

relocate an office, or

 

   

merge or consolidate with, or acquire the assets or assume the liabilities of, a federally regulated financial institution

In the case of a bank holding company applying for approval to acquire a bank or other bank holding company, the Federal Reserve will assess the record of each subsidiary bank of the applicant bank holding company, and such records may be the basis for denying the application.

The BHC Act generally prohibits a bank holding company from engaging in activities other than banking, or managing or controlling banks or other permissible subsidiaries, and from acquiring or retaining direct or indirect control of any company engaged in any activities other than those activities determined by the Federal Reserve to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. In determining whether a particular activity is permissible, the Federal Reserve must consider whether the

 

6


Table of Contents

performance of such an activity can reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest, or unsound banking practices. For example, factoring accounts receivable, acquiring or servicing loans, leasing personal property, conducting securities brokerage activities, performing certain data processing services, acting as agent or broker in selling credit life insurance and certain other types of insurance in connection with credit transactions, and certain insurance underwriting activities have all been determined by regulations of the Federal Reserve to be permissible activities of bank holding companies. Despite prior approval, the Federal Reserve has the power to order a holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any activity or terminate its ownership or control of any subsidiary, when it has reasonable cause to believe that continuation of such activity or such ownership or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness, or stability of any bank subsidiary of that bank holding company.

Dodd-Frank Act. On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, into law. The Dodd-Frank Act will have a broad impact on the financial services industry, including potentially significant regulatory and compliance changes including, among other things, (1) enhanced resolution authority of troubled and failing banks and their holding companies; (2) potential changes to capital and liquidity requirements; (3) changes to regulatory examination fees; (4) changes to assessments to be paid to the FDIC for federal deposit insurance; and (5) numerous other provisions designed to improve supervision and oversight of, and strengthening safety and soundness for, the financial services sector. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act establishes a new framework for systemic risk oversight within the financial system to be distributed among new and existing federal regulatory agencies, including the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or the OCC, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the FDIC. Many of the requirements called for in the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented over time and most will be subject to implementing regulations over the course of several years. Given the uncertainty associated with the manner in which the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented by the various regulatory agencies and through regulations, the full extent of the impact such requirements will have on our operations is unclear. The changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act may impact the profitability of our business activities, require changes to certain of our business practices, impose upon us more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage ratio requirements or otherwise adversely affect our business. These changes may also require us to invest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make necessary changes in order to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements. Failure to comply with any such laws, regulations, or principles or changes thereto, may negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition. While we cannot predict what effect any presently contemplated or future changes in the laws or regulations or their interpretations would have on us, these changes could be materially adverse to our investors and shareholders.

The following items provide a brief description of the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on our operations and activities, both currently and prospectively.

 

   

Increased Capital Standards and Enhanced Supervision. The federal banking agencies are required to establish minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements for banks and bank holding companies. These new standards will be no lower than existing regulatory capital and leverage standards applicable to insured depository institutions and may, in fact, be higher when established by the agencies. Compliance with heightened capital standards may reduce our ability to generate or originate revenue-producing assets and thereby restrict revenue generation from banking and non-banking operations. The Dodd-Frank Act also increases regulatory oversight, supervision and examination of banks, bank holding companies and their respective subsidiaries by the appropriate regulatory agency. Compliance with new regulatory requirements and expanded examination processes could increase the Company’s cost of operations.

 

7


Table of Contents
   

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The Dodd-Frank Act creates a new, independent Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or the Bureau, within the Federal Reserve. The Bureau is tasked with establishing and implementing rules and regulations under certain federal consumer protection laws with respect to the conduct of providers of certain consumer financial products and services. The Bureau has rulemaking authority over many of the statutes governing products and services offered to bank consumers. Generally, we will not be directly subject to the rules and regulations of the Bureau. However, the Dodd-Frank Act permits states to adopt consumer protection laws and regulations that are stricter than those regulations promulgated by the Bureau and state attorneys general are permitted to enforce consumer protection rules adopted by the Bureau against certain state-chartered institutions. Any such new regulations could increase our cost of operations and, as a result, could limit our ability to expand into these products and services.

 

   

Deposit Insurance. The Dodd-Frank Act makes permanent the $250,000 deposit insurance limit for insured deposits. Amendments to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act also revise the assessment base against which an insured depository institution’s deposit insurance premiums paid to the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund, or the DIF, will be calculated. Under the amendments, the assessment base will no longer be the institution’s deposit base, but rather its average consolidated total assets less its average tangible equity. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act makes changes to the minimum designated reserve ratio of the DIF, increasing the minimum from 1.15 percent to 1.35 percent of the estimated amount of total insured deposits, and eliminating the requirement that the FDIC pay dividends to depository institutions when the reserve ratio exceeds certain thresholds. Several of these provisions could increase the FDIC deposit insurance premiums paid by us. The Dodd-Frank Act also provides that, effective one year after the date of enactment, depository institutions may pay interest on demand deposits.

 

   

Transactions with Affiliates. The Dodd-Frank Act enhances the requirements for certain transactions with affiliates under Section 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, including an expansion of the definition of “covered transactions” and increasing the amount of time for which collateral requirements regarding covered transactions must be maintained.

 

   

Transactions with Insiders. Insider transaction limitations are expanded through the strengthening on loan restrictions to insiders and the expansion of the types of transactions subject to the, various limits.

 

   

Enhanced Lending Limits. The Dodd-Frank Act strengthens the existing limits on a depository institution’s credit exposure to one borrower. Current banking law limits a depository institution’s ability to extend credit to one person (or group of related persons) in an amount exceeding certain thresholds. The Dodd-Frank Act expands the scope of these restrictions to include credit exposure arising from derivative transactions, repurchase agreements, and securities lending and borrowing transactions.

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. Enacted in 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act permits the creation of financial services holding companies that can offer a full range of financial products under a regulatory structure based on the principle of functional regulation. The law eliminated the legal barriers to affiliations among banks and securities firms, insurance companies, and other financial services companies. The law also provides financial organizations with the opportunity to structure these new financial affiliations through a holding company structure or a financial subsidiary. The law reserves the role of the Federal Reserve Board as the supervisor for bank holding companies. At the same time, the law also provides a system of functional regulation which is designed to utilize the various existing federal and state regulatory bodies. The law also sets up a process for coordination between the Federal Reserve Board and the Secretary of the Treasury regarding the approval of new financial activities for both bank holding companies and national bank financial subsidiaries.

The law also includes a minimum federal standard of financial privacy. Financial institutions are required to have written privacy policies that must be disclosed to customers. The disclosure of a financial institution’s privacy policy must take place at the time a customer relationship is established and not less than annually during

 

8


Table of Contents

the continuation of the relationship. The act also provides for the functional regulation of bank securities activities. The law repealed the exemption that banks were afforded from the definition of “broker,” and replaced it with a set of limited exemptions that allow the continuation of some historical activities performed by banks. In addition, the act amended the securities laws to include banks within the general definition of dealer. Regarding new bank products, the law provides a procedure for handling products sold by banks that have securities elements. In the area of Community Reinvestment Act activities, the law generally requires that financial institutions address the credit needs of low-to-moderate income individuals and neighborhoods in the communities in which they operate. Bank regulators are required to take the Community Reinvestment Act ratings of a bank or of the bank subsidiaries of a holding company into account when acting upon certain branch and bank merger and acquisition applications filed by the institution. Under the law, financial holding companies and banks that desire to engage in new financial activities are required to have satisfactory or better Community Reinvestment Act ratings when they commence the new activity.

Bank Regulation. CSB is chartered under the national banking laws and is subject to comprehensive regulation, examination and supervision by the OCC. VSB is a state chartered bank and is subject to comprehensive regulation, examination and supervision by the FDIC and the Florida Office. Each of the deposits of the Banks is insured by the FDIC to the extent provided by law. The Banks also are subject to various laws and regulations applicable to banks. Such regulations include limitations on loans to a single borrower and to its directors, officers and employees; restrictions on the opening and closing of branch offices; the maintenance of required capital and liquidity ratios; the granting of credit under equal and fair conditions; and the disclosure of the costs and terms of such credit. The Banks submit to their examining agencies periodic reports regarding their financial condition and other matters. The bank regulatory agencies have a broad range of powers to enforce regulations under their jurisdiction, and to take discretionary actions determined to be for the protection and safety and soundness of banks, including the institution of cease and desist orders and the removal of directors and officers. The bank regulatory agencies also have the authority to approve or disapprove mergers, consolidations, and similar corporate actions.

There are various statutory limitations on the ability of our Company to pay dividends. The bank regulatory agencies also have the general authority to limit the dividend payment by banks if such payment may be deemed to constitute an unsafe and unsound practice. For information on the restrictions on the right of our Banks to pay dividends to our Company, see Part II—Item 5 “Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Purchases of Equity Securities.”

Under federal law, federally insured banks are subject, with certain exceptions, to certain restrictions on any extension of credit to their parent holding companies or other affiliates, on investment in the stock or other securities of affiliates, and on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral from any borrower. In addition, banks are prohibited from engaging in certain tie-in arrangements in connection with any extension of credit or the providing of any property or service.

The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”) imposed major regulatory reforms, stronger capital standards and stronger civil and criminal enforcement provisions. FIRREA also provides that a depository institution insured by the FDIC can be held liable for any loss incurred by, or reasonably expected to be incurred by, the FDIC in connection with:

 

   

the default of a commonly controlled FDIC insured depository institution; or

 

   

any assistance provided by the FDIC to a commonly controlled FDIC insured institution in danger of default.

The FDIC Improvement Act of 1993 (“FDICIA”) made a number of reforms addressing the safety and soundness of deposit insurance funds, supervision, accounting, and prompt regulatory action, and also implemented other regulatory improvements. Periodic full-scope, on-site examinations are required of all insured depository institutions. The cost for conducting an examination of an institution may be assessed to that institution, with special consideration given to affiliates and any penalties imposed for failure to provide

 

9


Table of Contents

information requested. Insured state banks also are precluded from engaging as principal in any type of activity that is impermissible for a national bank, including activities relating to insurance and equity investments. The Act also recodified restrictions on extensions of credit to insiders under the Federal Reserve Act.

Capital Requirements. The Federal Reserve Board and bank regulatory agencies require bank holding companies and financial institutions to maintain capital at adequate levels based on a percentage of assets and off-balance sheet exposures, adjusted for risk weights ranging from 0% to 100%. Under the risk-based standard, capital is classified into two tiers. Tier 1 capital consists of common shareholders’ equity (excluding the unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities), trust preferred securities subject to certain limitations, and minus certain intangible assets and disallowed deferred tax assets. Tier 2 capital consists of the general allowance for credit losses except for certain limitations. An institution’s qualifying capital base for purposes of its risk-based capital ratio consists of the sum of its Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. The regulatory minimum requirements are 4% for Tier 1 and 8% for total risk-based capital. At December 31, 2010, our Tier 1 and total risk-based capital ratios were 18.0% and 19.3%, respectively.

FDICIA contains “prompt corrective action” provisions pursuant to which banks are to be classified into one of five categories based upon capital adequacy, ranging from “well capitalized” to “critically undercapitalized” and which require (subject to certain exceptions) the appropriate federal banking agency to take prompt corrective action with respect to an institution which becomes “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized.”

The OCC and the FDIC have issued regulations to implement the “prompt corrective action” provisions of FDICIA. In general, the regulations define the five capital categories as follows:

 

   

an institution is “well capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater, has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6% or greater, has a leverage ratio of 5% or greater and is not subject to any written capital order or directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measures;

 

   

an institution is “adequately capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8% or greater, has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4% or greater, and has a leverage ratio of 4% or greater;

 

   

an institution is “undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8%, has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio that is less than 4% or has a leverage ratio that is less than 4%;

 

   

an institution is “significantly undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 6%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio that is less than 3% or a leverage ratio that is less than 3%; and

 

   

an institution is “critically undercapitalized” if its “tangible equity” is equal to or less than 2% of its total assets.

The OCC and the FDIC, after an opportunity for a hearing, have authority to downgrade an institution from “well capitalized” to “adequately capitalized” or to subject an “adequately capitalized” or “undercapitalized” institution to the supervisory actions applicable to the next lower category, for supervisory concerns.

Generally, FDICIA requires that an “undercapitalized” institution must submit an acceptable capital restoration plan to the appropriate federal banking agency within 45 days after the institution becomes “undercapitalized” and the agency must take action on the plan within 60 days. The appropriate federal banking agency may not accept a capital restoration plan unless, among other requirements, each company having control of the institution has guaranteed that the institution will comply with the plan until the institution has been adequately capitalized on average during each of the three consecutive calendar quarters and has provided adequate assurances of performance. The aggregate liability under this provision of all companies having control of an institution is limited to the lesser of:

 

   

5% of the institution’s total assets at the time the institution becomes “undercapitalized” or

 

   

the amount which is necessary, or would have been necessary, to bring the institution into compliance with all capital standards applicable to the institution as of the time the institution fails to comply with the plan filed pursuant to FDICIA

 

10


Table of Contents

An “undercapitalized” institution may not acquire an interest in any company or any other insured depository institution, establish or acquire additional branch offices or engage in any new business unless the appropriate federal banking agency has accepted its capital restoration plan, the institution is implementing the plan, and the agency determines that the proposed action is consistent with and will further the achievement of the plan, or the appropriate Federal banking agency determines the proposed action will further the purpose of the “prompt corrective action” sections of FDICIA.

If an institution is “critically undercapitalized,” it must comply with the restrictions described above. In addition, the appropriate Federal banking agency is authorized to restrict the activities of any “critically undercapitalized” institution and to prohibit such an institution, without the appropriate Federal banking agency’s prior written approval, from:

 

   

entering into any material transaction other than in the usual course of business;

 

   

engaging in any covered transaction with affiliates (as defined in Section 23A(b) of the Federal Reserve Act);

 

   

paying excessive compensation or bonuses; and

 

   

paying interest on new or renewed liabilities at a rate that would increase the institution’s weighted average costs of funds to a level significantly exceeding the prevailing rates of interest on insured deposits in the institution’s normal market areas.

The “prompt corrective action” provisions of FDICIA also provide that in general no institution may make a capital distribution if it would cause the institution to become “undercapitalized.” Capital distributions include cash (but not stock) dividends, stock purchases, redemptions, and other distributions of capital to the owners of an institution.

Additionally, FDICIA requires, among other things, that:

 

   

only a “well capitalized” depository institution may accept brokered deposits without prior regulatory approval and

 

   

the appropriate federal banking agency annually examine all insured depository institutions, with some exceptions for small, “well capitalized” institutions and state-chartered institutions examined by state regulators.

FDICIA also contains a number of consumer banking provisions, including disclosure requirements and substantive contractual limitations with respect to deposit accounts.

As of December 31, 2010, each of our subsidiary Banks met the capital requirements of a “well capitalized” institution.

Enforcement Powers. Congress has provided the federal bank regulatory agencies with an array of powers to enforce laws, rules, regulations and orders. Among other things, the agencies may require that institutions cease and desist from certain activities, may preclude persons from participating in the affairs of insured depository institutions, may suspend or remove deposit insurance, and may impose civil money penalties against institution-affiliated parties for certain violations.

Maximum Legal Interest Rates. Like the laws of many states, Florida law contains provisions on interest rates that may be charged by banks and other lenders on certain types of loans. Numerous exceptions exist to the general interest limitations imposed by Florida law. The relative importance of these interest limitation laws to the financial operations of the Banks will vary from time to time, depending on a number of factors, including conditions in the money markets, the costs and availability of funds, and prevailing interest rates.

 

11


Table of Contents

Branch Banking. Banks in Florida are permitted to branch state wide. Such branch banking, however, is subject to prior approval by the bank regulatory agencies. Any such approval would take into consideration several factors, including the bank’s level of capital, the prospects and economics of the proposed branch office, and other conditions deemed relevant by the bank regulatory agencies for purposes of determining whether approval should be granted to open a branch office.

Change of Control. Federal law restricts the amount of voting stock of a bank holding company and a bank that a person may acquire without the prior approval of banking regulators. The overall effect of such laws is to make it more difficult to acquire a bank holding company and a bank by tender offer or similar means than it might be to acquire control of another type of corporation. Consequently, shareholders of the Company may be less likely to benefit from the rapid increases in stock prices that may result from tender offers or similar efforts to acquire control of other companies. Federal law also imposes restrictions on acquisitions of stock in a bank holding company and a state bank. Under the federal Change in Bank Control Act and the regulations thereunder, a person or group must give advance notice to the Federal Reserve before acquiring control of any bank holding company, the OCC before acquiring control of any national bank and the FDIC and the Florida Department before acquiring control of a state bank. Upon receipt of such notice, the bank regulatory agencies may approve or disapprove the acquisition. The Change in Bank Control Act creates a rebuttable presumption of control if a member or group acquires a certain percentage or more of a bank holding company’s or state bank’s voting stock, or if one or more other control factors set forth in the Act are present.

Effect of Governmental Policies. Our earnings and businesses are affected by the policies of various regulatory authorities of the United States, especially the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve, among other things, regulates the supply of credit and deals with general economic conditions within the United States. The instruments of monetary policy employed by the Federal Reserve for those purposes influence in various ways the overall level of investments, loans, other extensions of credit, and deposits, and the interest rates paid on liabilities and received on assets.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted which imposes a myriad of corporate governance and accounting measures designed that shareholders are treated and have full and accurate information about the public companies in which they invest. All public companies are affected by the Act. Some of the principal provisions of the Act include:

 

   

the creation of an independent accounting oversight board (“PCAOB”) to oversee the audit of public companies and auditors who perform such audits;

 

   

auditor independence provisions which restrict non-audit services that independent accountants may provide to their audit clients;

 

   

additional corporate governance and responsibility measures which (a) require the chief executive officer and chief financial officer to certify financial statements and internal controls and to forfeit salary and bonuses in certain situations, and (b) protect whistleblowers and informants;

 

   

expansion of the authority and responsibilities of the company’s audit, nominating and compensation committees;

 

   

mandatory disclosure by analysts of potential conflicts of interest; and

 

   

enhanced penalties for fraud and other violations.

USA Patriot Act. In 2001, the USA Patriot Act was enacted. The Act requires financial institutions to help prevent, detect and prosecute international money laundering and financing of terrorism. The effectiveness of a financial institution in combating money laundering activities is a factor to be considered in any application submitted by the financial institution with the bank regulatory agencies. Our Banks have adopted systems and procedures designed to comply with the USA Patriot Act and regulations adopted thereunder by the Secretary of the Treasury.

 

12


Table of Contents

Competition

We encounter strong competition both in making loans and in attracting deposits. The deregulation of the banking industry and the widespread enactment of state laws which permit multi-bank holding companies as well as an increasing level of interstate banking have created a highly competitive environment for commercial banking. In one or more aspects of its business, our Company competes with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, brokerage and investment banking companies, and other financial intermediaries. Most of these competitors, some of which are affiliated with bank holding companies, have substantially greater resources and lending limits, and may offer certain services that we do not currently provide. In addition, many of our non-bank competitors are not subject to the same extensive federal regulations that govern bank holding companies and federally insured banks. Recent legislation has heightened the competitive environment in which financial institutions must conduct their business, and the potential for competition among financial institutions of all types has increased significantly.

To compete, we rely upon specialized services, responsive handling of customer needs, and personal contacts by its officers, directors, and staff. Large multi-branch banking competitors tend to compete primarily by rate and the number and location of branches while smaller, independent financial institutions tend to compete primarily by rate and personal service.

Employees

As of December 31, 2010, we had a total of approximately 600 full-time equivalent employees. The employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit. We consider relations with employees to be good.

Statistical Profile and Other Financial Data

Reference is hereby made to the statistical and financial data contained in the section captioned “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” for statistical and financial data providing a review of our Company’s business activities.

Availability of Reports furnished or filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available on our internet website at www.centerstatebanks.com.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We have identified risk factors described below, which should be viewed in conjunction with the other information contained in this document and information incorporated by reference, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. If any of the following risks or other risks which have not been identified or which we may believe are immaterial or unlikely, actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed. As noted previously, this report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including statements about our future plans, objectives, intentions and expectations. Many factors, including those described below, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements.

Recent developments in the financial services industry and the U.S. and global capital markets may adversely impact our operations and results.

Developments in the capital markets over past several years have resulted in uncertainty in the financial markets in general, with the expectation of the general economic downturn continuing in the 2011 and potentially

 

13


Table of Contents

longer. Loan portfolio performance has deteriorated at many institutions resulting from, among other factors, a weak economy and a decline in the value of collateral. Stock prices of bank holding companies, like ours, have been negatively affected by the current condition of the financial markets and the economy, as has our ability, if needed, to raise capital or borrow in the debt markets, compared to prior periods. As a result, new laws and regulations, including the Dodd-Frank Act, regarding lending, funding practices and capital and liquidity standards have been adopted or are being proposed. The financial institution regulatory agencies are expected to aggressively respond to concerns and adverse trends identified in examinations, including the expected issuance of many enforcement actions. Changes in the financial services industry and the effects of the Dodd-Frank Act and other regulatory responses to the credit crisis could negatively affect us by restricting our business operations, including our ability to originate or sell loans, and adversely impact our financial performance.

Recent Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives Could Affect Our Operations

President Obama recently signed the Dodd-Frank Act which will further increase the regulation and oversight of the financial services industry. The Act addresses, among other things, systemic risk, capital adequacy, deposit insurance assessments, consumer financial protection, interchange fees, derivatives, lending limits, thrift charters and changes among the banking regulatory agencies. Many of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act require studies and regulations. Certain provisions will not apply to banking organizations with less than $10 billion of assets. We cannot predict the effects of this legislation and regulations on us, our competitors, customers, counter parties, and on the financial markets and the economy, although it may significantly increase costs and impede efficiency of internal business processes. It also may require us to hold higher levels of regulatory capital and/or liquidity and it may cause us to adjust our business strategy and limit our future business opportunities.

We cannot predict the effect on our operations of recent legislative and regulatory initiatives that were enacted in response to the ongoing financial crisis.

The U.S. federal, state and foreign governments have taken or are considering extraordinary actions in an attempt to deal with the worldwide financial crisis and the severe decline in the global economy. To the extent adopted, many of these actions have been in effect for only a limited time, and have produced limited or no relief to the capital, credit and real estate markets. There is no assurance that these actions or other actions under consideration will ultimately be successful. The Dodd-Frank Act has just been adopted, and requires numerous studies and rulemaking. We cannot predict the effects of this recent legislation or the new regulations that will be issued to implement it, on us, our competitors, counterparties, and on the financial markets and the economy.

Deterioration in local economic and housing markets has led to loan losses and reduced earnings and could lead to additional loan losses and reduced earnings.

There has been a dramatic decrease in housing and real estate values in Florida during the current economic downturn, coupled with a significant increase in the rate of unemployment. These trends have contributed to an increase in our non-performing loans and reduced asset quality. As of December 31, 2010, our non-performing loans were approximately $65.8 million, or 7.06% of the loan portfolio, excluding loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements. Nonperforming assets were approximately $78.5 million as of this same date, or 3.81% of total assets. In addition, we had approximately $18.3 million in accruing loans that were between 30 and 89 days delinquent at December 31, 2010. If market conditions continue to deteriorate, they may lead to additional valuation adjustments on our loan portfolio and real estate owned as we continue to reassess the market value of our loan portfolio, the losses associated with the loans in default and the net realizable value of real estate owned.

Our non-performing assets adversely affect our net income in various ways. Until economic and market conditions improve, we expect to continue to incur additional losses relating to an increase in non-performing loans. We do not record interest income on non-accrual loans or other real estate owned, thereby adversely affecting our income, and increasing our loan administration costs. When we take collateral in foreclosures and

 

14


Table of Contents

similar proceedings, we are required to mark the related loan to the then-fair market value of the collateral, which may result in a loss. These loans and other real estate owned also increase our risk profile and the capital our regulators believe is appropriate in light of such risks. In addition, the resolution of nonperforming assets requires significant commitments of time from management and our directors, which can be detrimental to the performance of their other responsibilities. We may determine to sell nonperforming assets from time to time to improve our credit quality and reduce the time and costs of carrying these assets. These sales likely will result in losses.

A portion of our loans are to customers who have been adversely affected by the home building industry.

Customers who are builders and developers face greater difficulty in selling their homes in markets where the decrease in housing and real estate values are more pronounced. Consequently, we are facing increased delinquencies and nonperforming assets as these customers are forced to default on their loans. We do not anticipate that the housing market will improve in the near-term, and accordingly, additional downgrades, provisions for loan losses and charge-offs relating to their loan portfolios may occur.

Our loan portfolio includes commercial and commercial real estate loans that have higher risks.

Our commercial and commercial real estate loans at December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $584.5 million and $536.8 million, respectively, or 52% and 56% of total loans. Commercial and commercial real estate loans generally carry larger loan balances and can involve a greater degree of financial and credit risk than other loans. As a result, banking regulators continue to give greater scrutiny to lenders with a high concentration of commercial real estate loans in their portfolios, and such lenders are expected to implement stricter underwriting, internal controls, risk management policies and portfolio stress testing, as well as higher capital levels and loss allowances. The increased financial and credit risk associated with these types of loans are a result of several factors, including the concentration of principal in a limited number of loans and borrowers, the size of loan balances, the effects of general economic conditions on income-producing properties and the increased difficulty of evaluating and monitoring these types of loans.

The federal bank regulatory agencies have released guidance on “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending” (the “Guidance”). The Guidance defines commercial real estate loans as exposures secured by raw land, land development and construction (including 1-4 family residential construction), multi-family property, and non-farm nonresidential property where the primary or a significant source of repayment is derived from rental income associated with the property (that is, loans for which 50% or more of the source of repayment comes from third party, non-affiliated, rental income) or the proceeds of the sale, refinancing, or permanent financing of the property. The Guidance requires that appropriate processes be in place to identify, monitor and control risks associated with real estate lending concentrations. This could include enhanced strategic planning, underwriting policies, risk management, internal controls, portfolio stress testing and risk exposure limits as well as appropriately designed compensation and incentive programs. Higher allowances for loan losses and capital levels may also be required. The Guidance is triggered when commercial real estate loan concentrations exceed either:

 

   

total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land of 100% or more of a bank’s total capital; or

 

   

Total reported loans secured by multifamily and nonfarm nonresidential properties and loans for construction, land development, and other land of 300% or more of a bank’s total capital.

The Guidance applies to the lending activities of each of our Banks. Although our regulators have not required us to maintain elevated levels of capital or liquidity due to our commercial real estate loan concentrations, the regulators may do so in the future, especially if there is a further downturn in our local real estate markets.

In addition, when underwriting a commercial or industrial loan, the Banks may take a security interest in commercial real estate, and, in some instances upon a default by the borrower, we may foreclose on and take title

 

15


Table of Contents

to the property, which may lead to potential financial risks for us under applicable environmental laws. If hazardous substances were discovered on any of these properties, we may be liable to governmental agencies or third parties for the costs of remediation of the hazard, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Many environmental laws can impose liability regardless of whether the Banks knew of, or were responsible for, the contamination.

Furthermore, the repayment of loans secured by commercial real estate is typically dependent upon the successful operation of the related real estate or commercial project. If the cash flows from the project are reduced, a borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. This cash flow shortage may result in the failure to make loan payments. In such cases, the Banks may be compelled to modify the terms of the loan. In addition, the nature of these loans is such that they are generally less predictable and more difficult to evaluate and monitor. As a result, repayment of these loans may, to a greater extent than residential loans, be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or economy.

Our business is subject to the success of the local economies where we operate.

Our success significantly depends upon the growth in population, income levels, deposits and housing starts in our primary and secondary markets. During the current economic downturn, the rate of growth of each of these four factors has decreased substantially and in some cases has turned negative. If the communities in which we operate do not grow or if prevailing economic conditions locally or nationally continue to remain challenging, our business may be adversely affected. Our specific market areas have experienced decreased growth, which has affected the ability of our customers to repay their loans to us and has generally affected our financial condition and results of operations. We are less able than a larger institution to spread the risks of unfavorable local economic conditions across a large number of diversified economies. Moreover, we cannot give any assurance we will benefit from any market growth or favorable economic conditions in our primary market areas if they do occur.

If the value of real estate in our core Florida markets were to remain depressed or decline further, a significant portion of our loan portfolio could become under-collateralized, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

With our loans concentrated in Florida, the decline in local economic conditions has adversely affected the values of our real estate collateral and will likely continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Consequently, a prolonged decline in local economic conditions may have a greater effect on our earnings and capital than on the earnings and capital of larger financial institutions whose real estate loan portfolios are geographically diverse.

In addition to relying on the financial strength and cash flow characteristics of the borrower in each case, the Banks often secure loans with real estate collateral. At December 31, 2010, approximately 86% of the Banks’ loans have real estate as a primary or secondary component of collateral. The real estate collateral in each case provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower but may deteriorate in value during the time credit is extended. If we are required to liquidate the collateral securing a loan to satisfy the debt during a period of reduced real estate values, our earnings and capital could be adversely affected.

An inadequate allowance for loan losses would reduce our earnings.

The risk of credit losses on loans varies with, among other things, general economic conditions, the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan and, in the case of a collateralized loan, the value and marketability of the collateral for the loan. Management maintains an allowance for loan losses based upon, among other things, historical experience, an evaluation of economic conditions and regular reviews of delinquencies and loan portfolio quality. Based upon such factors, management makes various assumptions and judgments about the ultimate collectibility of the loan portfolio and provides an allowance for loan losses based upon a percentage of the outstanding balances and for specific loans when their

 

16


Table of Contents

ultimate collectibility is considered questionable. If management’s assumptions and judgments prove to be incorrect and the allowance for loan losses is inadequate to absorb losses, or if bank regulatory authorities require the Banks to increase the allowance for loan losses as a part of their examination process, the Banks’ earnings and capital could be significantly and adversely affected.

A lack of liquidity could affect our operations and jeopardize our financial condition.

Liquidity is essential to our business. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Our funding sources include federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, non-core deposits, and short- and long-term debt. There are other sources of liquidity available to us or the Banks should they be needed, including our ability to acquire additional non-core deposits, the issuance and sale of debt securities, and the issuance and sale of preferred or common securities in public or private transactions. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our activities or on terms that are acceptable to us could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry or economy in general. Our ability to borrow could be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as further disruption in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry in light of the recent turmoil faced by banking organizations and the continued deterioration in credit markets.

We are required to maintain capital to meet regulatory requirements, and if we fail to maintain sufficient capital, whether due to losses, an inability to raise additional capital or otherwise, our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, as well as our ability to maintain regulatory compliance, would be adversely affected.

Our bank holding company and the Banks must meet regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity. Banking organizations experiencing growth, especially those making acquisitions are expected to hold additional capital, above regulatory minimums. Our ability to raise additional capital, when and if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, including investor perceptions regarding the banking industry and market condition, and governmental activities, many of which are outside our control, and on our financial condition and performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to raise additional capital if needed or on terms acceptable to us. If we fail to meet these capital and other regulatory requirements, our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

Our failure to remain “well capitalized” for bank regulatory purposes could affect customer confidence, our ability to grow, our costs of funds and FDIC insurance costs, our ability to pay dividends on common stock and make distributions on our trust preferred securities, our ability to make acquisitions, and our business, results of operations and financial condition. Under FDIC rules, if any of the Banks ceases to be a “well capitalized” institution for bank regulatory purposes, the interest rates that it pays and its ability to accept brokered deposits may be restricted. Although the Banks had no wholesale brokered deposits as of December 31, 2010, they had $31.1 million of in-market CDARs deposits, which are considered brokered deposits for regulatory purposes.

Our business strategy includes continued growth, and our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if we fail to grow or fail to manage our growth effectively.

We intend to continue pursuing a growth strategy for our business. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in significant growth stages of development. Particularly in light of prevailing economic conditions, we cannot assure you we will be able to expand our market presence in our existing markets or successfully enter new markets or that any such expansion will not adversely affect our results of operations. Failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, future prospects, financial condition or results of operations, and could adversely affect our ability to successfully implement our business strategy. Also, if our growth occurs more slowly than anticipated or declines, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.

 

17


Table of Contents

Our ability to successfully grow will depend on a variety of factors including the continued availability of desirable business opportunities, the competitive responses from other financial institutions in our market areas and our ability to manage our growth. While we believe we have the management resources and internal systems in place to successfully manage our future growth, there can be no assurance growth opportunities will be available or growth will be successfully managed.

We may face risks with respect to future expansion.

We may acquire other financial institutions through FDIC assisted transactions or otherwise or parts of those institutions in the future and we may engage in additional de novo branch expansion. We may also consider and enter into new lines of business or offer new products or services. We also may receive future inquiries and have discussions with potential acquirors of us. Acquisitions and mergers involve a number of risks, including:

 

   

the time and costs associated with identifying and evaluating potential acquisitions and merger partners;

 

   

inaccurate estimates and judgments regarding credit, operations, management and market risks of the target institution;

 

   

the time and costs of evaluating new markets, hiring experienced local management and opening new offices, and the time lags between these activities and the generation of sufficient assets and deposits to support the costs of the expansion;

 

   

our ability to finance an acquisition and possible dilution to our existing shareholders;

 

   

the diversion of our management’s attention to the negotiation of a transaction, and the integration of the operations and personnel of the combining businesses;

 

   

entry into new markets where we lack experience;

 

   

the strain of growth on our infrastructure, staff, internal controls and management, which may require additional personnel, time and expenditures;

 

   

exposure to potential asset quality issues with acquired institutions;

 

   

the introduction of new products and services into our business;

 

   

the possibility of unknown or contingent liabilities;

 

   

the incurrence and possible impairment of goodwill associated with an acquisition and possible adverse short-term effects on our results of operations; and

 

   

the risk of loss of key employees and customers.

We may incur substantial costs to expand, and we can give no assurance such expansion will result in the levels of profits we seek. There can be no assurance that integration efforts for any future mergers or acquisitions will be successful. Also, we may issue equity securities, including common stock and securities convertible into shares of our common stock, in connection with future acquisitions, which could cause ownership and economic dilution to our current shareholders and to investors purchasing common stock in this offering. There is no assurance that, following any future mergers or acquisitions, our integration efforts will be successful or our company, after giving effect to the acquisition, will achieve profits comparable to or better than our historical experience.

The FDIC-assisted transactions we have engaged in or may engage in could present additional risks to our business.

We have closed several FDIC-assisted transactions and continue to seek opportunities to continue to acquire the assets and liabilities of other failed banks in FDIC-assisted transactions. Current and future FDIC-assisted

 

18


Table of Contents

transactions present the risks of acquisitions, generally, as well as some risks specific to these transactions. These FDIC-assisted transactions typically provide for FDIC assistance, including potential loss-sharing, to an acquirer to mitigate the credit risks of acquired loans and securities, which, may include loss-sharing. FDIC-assisted transactions have many of the same risks we could face in acquiring another open bank without FDIC assistance, including risks associated with competitive bidding and pricing of such transactions, the risk of loss of deposits and, liquidity through runoff or customer attrition, and failure to realize the anticipated acquisition benefits in the amounts and within the timeframes we expect. In addition, because these acquisitions provide for limited diligence and negotiation of terms, these transactions may pose risks not present in open bank transactions. Loss sharing with the FDIC reduces the credit risks of, and capital required for, FDIC-assisted transactions, but requires additional resources and time to service acquired problem loans, costs related to integration of personnel and operating systems, and the establishment of processes and internal controls to service acquired assets in accordance with FDIC standards. If we are unable to manage these risks, FDIC-assisted acquisitions could have material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Attractive acquisition opportunities may not be available to us in the future.

While we seek continued organic growth, as our earnings and capital position improve, we may consider the acquisition of other businesses, including, as discussed above, failed depository institutions offered for sale in FDIC-assisted transactions. The FDIC determines the timing and terms of the sale of failed institutions, and selects the winning bidder based on the “least cost” to the FDIC. The failed banks offered for sale may or may not meet our business objectives. We expect that other banking and financial companies, many of which have significantly greater resources, will compete with us to acquire financial services businesses. This competition could increase prices for potential acquisitions, including the premiums on deposits and the prices paid for assets in FDIC-assisted transactions. This could reduce our potential returns, and reduce the attractiveness of these opportunities and increase their credit and other risks. Also, acquisitions are subject to various regulatory approvals. If we fail to receive the appropriate regulatory approvals, we will not be able to consummate an acquisition that we believe is in our best interests. Among other things, our regulators consider our capital, liquidity, profitability, regulatory compliance and levels of goodwill and intangibles when considering acquisition and expansion proposals. Any acquisition could be dilutive to our earnings and shareholders’ equity per share of our common stock.

Our recent results may not be indicative of our future results.

We may not be able to sustain our historical rate of growth or may not even be able to grow our business at all. In addition, our recent growth may distort some of our historical financial ratios and statistics. Various factors, such as economic conditions, regulatory and legislative considerations and competition, may also impede or prohibit our ability to expand our market presence. If we experience a significant decrease in our historical rate of growth, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected due to a high percentage of our operating costs being fixed expenses.

Our continued pace of growth may require us to raise additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed.

We are required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you of our ability to raise additional capital if needed on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our ability to further expand our operations through internal growth and acquisitions could be materially impaired.

Changes in interest rates may negatively affect our earnings and the value of our assets.

Our earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon our net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earnings assets, such as loans and investment securities,

 

19


Table of Contents

and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowed funds. Interest rates are sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions, competition and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the policies of the Federal Reserve. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence not only the interest our Banks receive on loans and investment securities and the amount of interest they pay on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could also affect (i) the Banks’ ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, (ii) the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities, including the available for sale securities portfolio, and (iii) the average duration of our interest-earning assets. Changes in monetary policy could also expose us to the risk that interest-earning assets may be more responsive to changes in interest rates than interest-bearing liabilities, or vice versa (repricing risk), the risk that the individual interest rates or rates indices underlying various interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities may not change in the same degree over a given time period (basis risk), and the risk of changing interest rate relationships across the spectrum of interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability maturities (yield curve risk), including a prolonged flat or inverted yield curve environment. Any substantial, unexpected, prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse affect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Higher FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments could adversely affect our financial condition.

FDIC insurance premiums increased substantially in the past two years and we expect to pay significantly higher FDIC premiums in the future. Market developments have significantly depleted the insurance fund of the FDIC and reduced the ratio of reserves to insured deposits.

The Dodd-Frank Act changes the FDIC deposit insurance assessments and increased the required Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) reserve ratio, and no longer requires that dividends be paid to FDIC members from excess reserves. It is likely that FDIC insurance costs will increase further, although banks with less than $10 billion of assets will have the effects of the higher DIF reserve ratio offset by the FDIC.

Current levels of market volatility are unprecedented.

The capital and credit markets have been experiencing volatility and disruption the past several years. In some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit availability for certain issuers without regard to those issuers’ underlying financial condition or performance. If current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, we may experience adverse effects, which may be material, on our ability to maintain or access capital and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our cost of funds may increase as a result of general economic conditions, FDIC insurance assessments, interest rates and competitive pressures.

Our cost of funds may increase as a result of general economic conditions, FDIC insurance assessments, interest rates and competitive pressures. We have traditionally obtained funds principally through local deposits and we have a base of lower cost transaction deposits. Generally, we believe local deposits are a less expensive and more stable source of funds than other borrowings because interest rates paid for local deposits are typically lower than interest rates charged for borrowings from other institutional lenders and reflect a mix of transaction and time deposits, whereas brokered deposits typically are higher cost time deposits. Our costs of funds and our profitability and liquidity are likely to be adversely affected, if and to the extent we have to rely upon higher cost borrowings from other institutional lenders or brokers to fund loan demand or liquidity needs, and changes in our deposit mix and growth could adversely affect our profitability and the ability to expand our loan portfolio.

Competition from financial institutions and other financial service providers may adversely affect our profitability.

The banking business is highly competitive and we experience competition in our markets from many other financial institutions. We compete with commercial banks, credit unions, savings and loan associations,

 

20


Table of Contents

mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market funds, and other mutual funds, as well as other super-regional, national and international financial institutions that operate offices in our primary market areas and elsewhere.

We compete with these institutions both in attracting deposits and in making loans. In addition, we have to attract our customer base from other existing financial institutions and from new residents. Many of our competitors are well-established, larger financial institutions. While we believe we can and do successfully compete with these other financial institutions in our primary markets, we may face a competitive disadvantage as a result of our smaller size, lack of geographic diversification and inability to spread our marketing costs across a broader market. Although we compete by concentrating our marketing efforts in our primary markets with local advertisements, personal contacts, and greater flexibility and responsiveness in working with local customers, we can give no assurance this strategy will be successful.

The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect us.

Our ability to engage in routine funding and other transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty or other relationships. Defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services institutions, or the financial services industry generally, have led to market-wide liquidity problems and losses of depositor, creditor and counterparty confidence and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other institutions. We could experience increases in deposits and assets as a result of other banks’ difficulties or failure, which would increase the capital we need to support our growth.

We are subject to extensive regulation that could limit or restrict our activities.

We operate in a highly regulated industry and are subject to examination, supervision, and comprehensive regulation by various federal and state agencies, including the Federal Reserve, the OCC, the FDIC, FINRA, the SEC, and the Florida Office. These regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors, not shareholders. Our compliance with these regulations is costly and restricts certain of our activities, including payment of dividends, mergers and acquisitions, investments, loans and interest rates charged, interest rates paid on deposits and locations of offices. We are also subject to capitalization guidelines established by our regulators, which require us to maintain adequate capital to support our growth.

The laws and regulations applicable to the banking industry could change at any time, and we cannot predict the effects of these changes on our business and profitability. Because government regulation greatly affects the business and financial results of all commercial banks and bank holding companies, our cost of compliance could adversely affect our ability to operate profitably.

We are dependent upon the services of our management team.

Our future success and profitability are substantially dependent upon the management and banking abilities of our senior executives. Although we currently have employment agreements in place with our senior management team, we cannot guarantee you that our senior executives will remain with us. Changes in key personnel and their responsibilities may be disruptive to our business and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We believe that our future results will also depend in part upon our attracting and retaining highly skilled and qualified management and sales and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot assure you that we will be successful in retaining such personnel.

Technological changes affect our business, and we may have fewer resources than many competitors to invest in technological improvements.

The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. In addition to serving clients better, the effective use of technology

 

21


Table of Contents

may increase efficiency and may enable financial institutions to reduce costs. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to use technology to provide products and services that provide convenience to customers and to create additional efficiencies in operations. We may need to make significant additional capital investments in technology in the future, and we may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services. Many competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements.

Hurricanes or other adverse weather events would negatively affect our local economies or disrupt our operations, which would have an adverse effect on our business or results of operations.

Our market areas in Florida are susceptible to hurricanes and tropical storms and related flooding and wind damage. Such weather events can disrupt operations, result in damage to properties and negatively affect the local economies in the markets where they operate. We cannot predict whether or to what extent damage that may be caused by future hurricanes will affect our operations or the economies in our current or future market areas, but such weather events could result in a decline in loan originations, a decline in the value or destruction of properties securing our loans and an increase in delinquencies, foreclosures or loan losses. Our business or results of operations may be adversely affected by these and other negative effects of future hurricanes or tropical storms, including flooding and wind damage. Many of our customers have incurred significantly higher property and casualty insurance premiums on their properties located in our markets, which may adversely affect real estate sales and values in those markets.

 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None

 

Item 2. Properties

Our Holding Company owns no real property. Our corporate office is leased from our lead subsidiary bank, and is located at 42745 U.S. Highway 27, Davenport, Florida 33837. Our Company, through our Banks, currently operates a total of 53 banking offices in fourteen counties in central Florida. We own 41 and lease 12 of these offices. In addition, we have leased office space in Birmingham, Alabama, Atlanta, Georgia and Winston-Salem, North Carolina used by our correspondent banking division personnel. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of our Company included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and Managements Discussion and Analysis—Bank Premises and Equipment, for additional information regarding our premises and equipment.

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Our Banks are periodically parties to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business, such as claims to enforce liens, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans, and other issues incident to their respective businesses. We do not believe that there is any pending or threatened proceeding against the Banks which would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position.

 

Item 4. [Removed and Reserved]

 

22


Table of Contents

PART II

 

Item 5. Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The shares of our Common Stock are traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. The following sets forth the high and low trading prices for trades of our Common Stock that occurred during 2010 and 2009.

 

     2010      2009  
   High      Low      High      Low  

1st Quarter

   $ 12.98       $ 9.85       $ 17.15       $ 6.21   

2nd Quarter

   $ 13.86       $ 10.07       $ 12.94       $ 7.32   

3rd Quarter

   $ 10.42       $ 7.84       $ 9.39       $ 6.50   

4th Quarter

   $ 9.83       $ 6.24       $ 10.92       $ 6.92   

As of December 31, 2010, there are 30,004,761 shares of common stock outstanding. There were approximately 923 registered shareholders as of that date, as reported by our transfer agent, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company.

Dividends

We have historically paid cash dividends on a quarterly basis, on the last business day of the calendar quarter. The following sets forth per share cash dividends paid during 2010 and 2009.

 

     2010      2009  

1st Quarter

   $ 0.01       $ 0.04   

2nd Quarter

   $ 0.01       $ 0.01   

3rd Quarter

   $ 0.01       $ 0.01   

4th Quarter

   $ 0.01       $ 0.01   

The payment of dividends is a decision of our Board of Directors based upon then-existing circumstances, including our rate of growth, profitability, financial condition, existing and anticipated capital requirements, the amount of funds legally available for the payment of cash dividends, regulatory constraints and such other factors as the Board determines relevant. Also, during the period we were under TARP restrictions, between November 21, 2008 and September 30, 2009, we were under a further restriction prohibiting any quarterly cash dividend in excess of $0.04 per share. Our source of funds for payment of dividends is dividends received from our Banks, or excess cash available to us. Payments by our subsidiary Banks to us are limited by law and regulations of the bank regulatory authorities. There are various statutory and contractual limitations on the ability of our Banks to pay dividends to us. The bank regulatory agencies also have the general authority to limit the dividends paid by banks if such payment may be deemed to constitute an unsafe and unsound practice. Our subsidiaries may not pay dividends from their paid-in surplus. All dividends must be paid out of undivided profits then on hand, after deducting expenses, including reserves for losses and bad debts. In addition, a national bank is prohibited from declaring a dividend on its shares of common stock until its surplus equals its stated capital, unless there has been transferred to surplus no less than one/tenth of the bank’s net profits of the preceding two consecutive half-year periods (in the case of an annual dividend). The approval of the OCC is required if the total of all dividends declared by a national bank in any calendar year exceeds the total of its net profits for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus. As to a state bank, no dividends may be paid at a time when the bank’s net income from the preceding two years is a loss or which would cause the capital accounts of the bank to fall below the minimum amount required by law, regulation, order or any written agreement with the Florida Office or a Federal regulatory agency.

 

23


Table of Contents

Share Repurchases

We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during 2010.

Stock Plans

With respect to information regarding our securities authorized for issuance under equity incentive plans, the information contained in the section entitled “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference.

Performance Graph

Shares of our common stock are traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The following graph compares the yearly percentage change in cumulative shareholder return on the Company’s common stock, with the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Index and the SNL Southeast Bank Index, since December 31, 2005 (assuming a $100 investment on December 31, 2005 and reinvestment of all dividends).

LOGO

 

     2005      2006      2007      2008      2009      2010  

CenterState Banks, Inc.

     100         122         71         101         61         48   

S&P 500

     100         116         122         77         97         112   

SNL Southeast Bank Index

     100         117         88         36         36         35   

 

24


Table of Contents
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data

The selected consolidated financial data presented below should be read in conjunction with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, and the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto, of the Company at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the three year period ended December 31, 2010, presented elsewhere herein.

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

For the twelve month period ending or as of December 31

 

(Dollars in thousands except for share and per
share data)

   2010     2009     2008     2007     2006  

SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS:

          

Total interest income

   $ 74,580      $ 73,944      $ 68,082      $ 75,173      $ 59,113   

Total interest expense

     (16,742     (22,290     (27,797     (32,825     (22,010
                                        

Net interest income

     57,838        51,654        40,285        42,348        37,103   

Provision for loan losses

     (29,624     (23,896     (6,520     (2,792     (717
                                        

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

     28,214        27,758        33,765        39,556        36,386   

Non-interest income

     13,826        9,620        7,251        7,097        5,896   

Income from correspondent banking and bond sales division

     32,696        17,916        1,412        —          —     

Net gain on sale of securities available for sale

     7,034        2,516        661        7        17   

Bargain purchase gain, acquisition of failed institution

     2,010        —          —          —          —     

Gain on sale of bank branch office real estate

     —          —          1,483        —          —     

Sale of bank shell

     —          —          —          1,000        —     

Impairment charge-core deposit intangible

     —          (1,200     —          —          —     

Credit related expenses

     (6,278     (4,553     (1,006     (76     —     

Non-interest expense

     (87,047     (62,961     (38,930     (35,888     (28,981
                                        

(Loss) income before income taxes

     (9,545     (10,904     4,636        11,696        13,318   

Income tax benefit (expense)

     4,002        4,687        (1,215     (3,897     (4,859
                                        

Net (loss) income

   $ (5,543   $ (6,217   $ 3,421      $ 7,799      $ 8,459   
                                        

PER COMMON SHARE DATA:

          

Basic (loss) earnings per share

   $ (0.20   $ (0.47   $ 0.26      $ 0.64      $ 0.77   

Diluted (loss) earnings per share

   $ (0.20   $ (0.47   $ 0.26      $ 0.63      $ 0.75   

Common equity per common share outstanding

   $ 8.42      $ 8.90      $ 12.22      $ 11.92      $ 10.54   

Tangible common equity per common share outstanding

   $ 7.02      $ 7.53      $ 9.64      $ 9.28      $ 9.38   

Dividends per common share

   $ 0.04      $ 0.07      $ 0.16      $ 0.15      $ 0.14   

Actual shares outstanding

     30,004,761        25,773,229        12,474,315        12,436,407        11,129,020   

Weighted average common shares outstanding

     27,608,211        17,905,042        12,452,375        12,108,590        10,964,890   

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding

     27,608,211        17,905,042        12,585,036        12,294,537        11,232,059   

BALANCE SHEET DATA:

          

Assets

   $ 2,063,319      $ 1,751,299      $ 1,333,143      $ 1,217,430      $ 1,077,102   

Total loans

     1,129,946        959,021        892,001        841,405        657,963   

Allowance for loan loss

     26,267        23,289        13,335        10,828        7,355   

Total deposits

     1,685,594        1,305,036        993,800        972,620        892,806   

Short-term borrowings

     97,284        195,501        141,183        75,646        52,792   

Corporate debenture

     12,500        12,500        12,500        12,500        10,000   

Preferred stockholders’ equity

     —          —          26,787        —          —     

Common stockholders’ equity

     252,644        229,410        152,378        148,282        117,332   

Total stockholders’ equity

     252,644        229,410        179,165        148,282        117,332   

Tangible capital

     210,688        194,148        147,099        115,439        104,386   

Goodwill

     38,035        32,840        28,118        28,118        9,863   

Core deposit intangible (CDI)

     3,921        2,422        3,948        4,725        3,083   

Average total assets

     1,935,495        1,771,034        1,238,005        1,189,268        981,640   

Average loans

     1,023,597        923,080        856,260        791,886        605,236   

Average interest earning assets

     1,734,746        1,628,798        1,108,180        1,068,591        894,286   

Average deposits

     1,517,302        1,254,169        975,352        963,033        807,471   

Average interest bearing deposits

     1,214,435        1,047,436        823,121        775,282        610,732   

Average interest bearing liabilities

     1,369,417        1,346,051        923,591        854,251        670,562   

Average total stockholders’ equity

     243,063        206,914        154,521        138,425        109,794   

 

25


Table of Contents

Selected Consolidated Financial Data—continued

For the twelve month period ending or as of December 31

 

(Dollars in thousands except for share and per
share data)

   2010     2009     2008     2007     2006  

SELECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS:

          

Return on average assets

     (0.29 %)      (0.35 %)      0.28     0.66     0.86

Return on average equity

     (2.28 %)      (3.00 %)      2.21     5.63     7.70

Dividend payout

     na        na        58     23     18

Efficiency (1)

     89     85     82     73     67

Net interest margin, tax equivalent basis (2)

     3.38     3.22     3.70     4.01     4.17

Net interest spread, tax equivalent basis (3)

     3.12     2.92     3.19     3.25     3.35

CAPITAL RATIOS:

          

Tier 1 leverage ratio

     10.33     11.36     12.59     10.78     11.23

Risk-based capital

          

Tier 1

     18.01     17.99     16.17     13.80     15.60

Total

     19.28     19.25     17.43     14.97     16.60

Tangible common equity ratio

     10.42     11.31     9.25     9.75     9.81

ASSET QUALITY RATIOS:

          

Net charge-offs to average loans

     2.83     1.51     0.47     0.12     0.08

Allowance to period end loans

     2.82     2.43     1.49     1.29     1.12

Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans

     40     55     67     266     1,206

Non-performing assets to total assets

     3.81     3.05     1.86     0.40     0.06

OTHER DATA:

          

Banking locations

     53        38        37        37        30   

Full-time equivalent employees

     602        478        399        371        320   

 

(1) Efficiency ratio is non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income before the provision for loan losses plus non-interest income, exclusive of non-recurring items.
(2) Net interest margin is net interest income divided by total average earning assets.
(3) Net interest spread is the difference between the average yield on earning assets and the average yield on average interest bearing liabilities.

 

26


Table of Contents

Quarterly Financial Information

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain consolidated quarterly financial information. This information is derived from our unaudited financial statements which include, in the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments which management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the results for such periods. The sum of the four quarters of earnings per share may not equal the total earnings per share for the full year due to rounding and due to the additional shares issued pursuant to our capital offerings in August 2009 and July 2010. This information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this document. The results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for future periods.

Selected Quarterly Data

(unaudited)

 

     2010     2009  

(Dollars in thousands except
for per share data)

  4Q     3Q     2Q     1Q     4Q     3Q     2Q     1Q  

Interest income

  $ 19,473      $ 19,106      $ 17,840      $ 18,161      $ 18,144      $ 18,847      $ 18,906      $ 18,047   

Interest expense

    (3,866     (4,343     (4,218     4,315        (4,659     (5,022     (6,054     (6,555
                                                               

Net interest income

    15,607        14,763        13,622        13,846        13,485        13,825        12,852        11,492   

Provision for loan losses

    (5,056     (16,448     (4,045     (4,075     (9,386     (8,682     (4,125     (1,703
                                                               

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

    10,551        (1,685     9,577        9,771        4,099        5,143        8,727        9,789   

Non-interest income

    4,231        3,766        3,148        2,681        2,792        2,649        2,204        1,975   

Income from correspondent banking and bond sales division

    7,140        11,828        7,372        6,356        7,119        5,630        2,610        2,557   

Bargain purchase gain on FDIC acquisition

    —          2,010        —          —          —          —          —          —     

Gain on sales of securities available for sale

    3,808        151        1,639        1,436        1,538        257        303        418   

Impairment charge on core deposit intangible

    —          —          —          —          (1,200     —          —          —     

Non-interest expenses

    (25,472     (27,530     (20,598     (19,725     (21,005     (17,663     (15,145     (13,701
                                                               

Income (loss) before income tax

    258        (11,460     1,138        519        (6,657     (3,984     (1,301     1,038   

Income tax benefit (expense)

    178        4,184        (234     (126     2,630        1,754        569        (266
                                                               

Net income (loss)

  $ 436      $ (7,276   $ 904      $ 393      $ (4,027   $ (2,230   $ (732   $ 772   
                                                               

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

  $ 0.01      $ (0.25   $ 0.03      $ 0.02      $ (0.16   $ (0.17   $ (0.09   $ 0.03   

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

  $ 0.01      $ (0.25   $ 0.03      $ 0.02      $ (0.16   $ (0.17   $ (0.09   $ 0.03   

 

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Some of the statements in this report constitute forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements related to future events, other future financial performance or business strategies, and include statements containing terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “scheduled,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative of such terms or other

 

27


Table of Contents

comparable terminology. Actual events or results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward looking statements, due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation: the effects of future economic conditions; governmental monetary and fiscal policies, as well as legislative and regulatory changes; the risks of changes in interest rates and the level and composition of deposits, loan demand, and the values of loan collateral; and the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, consumer finance companies, and other financial institutions operating in our market area and elsewhere. All forward looking statements attributable to our Company are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update these forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. There is no assurance that future results, levels of activity, performance or goals will be achieved.

Our discussion and analysis of earnings and related financial data are presented herein to assist investors in understanding the financial condition of our Company at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related footnotes of our Company presented elsewhere herein. Historical per share data has been adjusted to reflect our May 2006 two for one stock split.

Executive Summary

Organizational structure

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CenterState Banks, Inc. (the “Parent Company,” “Company,” “Corporate,” “CenterState” or “CSFL”), and our two wholly owned subsidiary banks (“CSB” and “VSB”) and our non bank subsidiary R4ALL, Inc. (“R4ALL”).

In December 2010 we merged our three national chartered banks together, combining Central, CSBNA and CSB into the surviving bank, CSB. On January 1, 2011 we merged CenterState Shared Services (“CSSS”), a wholly owned subsidiary of our previous four subsidiary banks, into CSB. CSSS provided item processing services and information technology services to all of our subsidiary banks. After it was merged into CSB, it continues performing these same services as a department within CSB.

At the holding company, or Parent Company, level, we perform functions that include strategic planning, merger and acquisition functions, investor relations, capital management, financial reporting, income tax management and reporting, loan review, internal audit, risk assessment and monitoring, and generally oversee and monitor the activities of our subsidiary banks. All of the operating activities associated with and related to the commercial banking business is performed and managed at the subsidiary bank level. In September 2009 we formed a separate non bank subsidiary, R4ALL, for the purpose of acquisition and disposition of troubled assets from our subsidiary banks.

 

28


Table of Contents

A condensed consolidating balance sheet at December 31, 2010 and a condensed consolidating statement of operations for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2010 is presented below.

 

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet                                          

At December 31, 2010

(Dollars are in thousands)

  CSB     CSSS     VSB     R4ALL     PARENT
COMPANY
    ELIMINATIONS     CONSOLIDATED  

Cash and due from banks

  $ 14,006      $ 2,106      $ 9,245      $ 170      $ 679      $ (2,955   $ 23,251   

Federal funds sold and Federal Reserve deposits

    142,297        —          12,037        —          —          (70     154,264   
                                                       

Cash and cash equivalents

    156,303        2,106        21,282        170        679        (3,025     177,515   

Investment securities available for sale, at fair value

    482,954        —          17,973        —          —          —          500,927   

Loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements

    198,197        —          —          —          —          —          198,197   

Loans, excluding those covered by FDIC loss share

    790,547        —          118,609        22,593        —          —          931,749   

Allowance for loan losses

    (20,466     —          (4,423     (1,378     —          —          (26,267

Bank premises and equipment, net

    71,389        1,528        11,501        —          564        —          84,982   

Goodwill

    19,779        —          18,256        —          —          —          38,035   

Core deposit intangibles

    2,571        —          1,350        —          —          —          3,921   

OREO covered by FDIC loss share agreements

    11,104        —          —          —          —          —          11,104   

OREO not covered by FDIC loss share agreements

    6,619        —          3,078        2,542        —          —          12,239   

Investment in subsidiaries

    3,200        —          1,066        —          247,716        (251,982     —     

All other assets

    114,848        688        6,394        6,326        18,723        (16,062     130,917   
                                                       

Total assets

  $ 1,837,045      $ 4,322      $ 195,086      $ 30,253      $ 267,682      $ (271,069   $ 2,063,319   
                                                       

Deposits

  $ 1,547,119      $ —        $ 141,430      $ —        $ —        $ (2,955   $ 1,685,594   

Other borrowings

    88,354        —          9,000        —          12,500        (70     109,784   

All other liabilities

    26,914        56        1,812        39        2,538        (16,062     15,297   

Total stockholders equity

    174,658        4,266        42,844        30,214        252,644        (251,982     252,644   
                                                       

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $ 1,837,045      $ 4,322      $ 195,086      $ 30,253      $ 267,682      $ (271,069   $ 2,063,319   
                                                       
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations                                      

For the 12 month period ending
December 31, 2010

(Dollars are in thousands)

  CSB     CSSS     VSB     R4ALL     PARENT
COMPANY
    ELIMINATIONS     CONSOLIDATED  

Interest income

  $ 65,448      $ —        $ 9,007      $ 133      $ —        $ (8   $ 74,580   

Interest expense

    (14,609     —          (1,720     0        (421     8        (16,742
                                                       

Net interest income

    50,839        —          7,287        133        (421     —          57,838   

Provision for loan losses

    (12,542     —          (2,293     (14,789     —          —          (29,624
                                                       

Net interest income after loan loss provision

    38,297        —          4,994        (14,656     (421     —          28,214   

Non interest income

    53,450        3,949        3,193          (3,540     (1,486     55,566   

Non interest expense

    (83,458     (3,949     (6,674     (1,529     (2,741     5,026        (93,325
                                                       

Net income (loss) before income tax provision

    8,289        —          1,513        (16,185     (6,702     3,540        (9,545

Income tax (provision) benefit

    (2,754     —          (491     6,088        1,159        —          4,002   
                                                       

Net income (loss)

  $ 5,535      $ —        $ 1,022      $ (10,097   $ (5,543   $ 3,540      $ (5,543
                                                       

 

29


Table of Contents

Through our subsidiary banks, we conduct commercial and retail banking business consisting of attracting deposits from the general public and applying those funds to the origination of commercial real estate loans, residential real estate loans, construction, development and land loans, and commercial loans and consumer loans. Most of our loans are secured by real estate located in central Florida.

Our profitability depends primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between interest income generated from interest-earning assets (i.e. loans and investments) less the interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities (i.e. customer deposits and borrowed funds). Net interest income is affected by the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the interest rate earned and paid on these balances. Net interest income is dependent upon the interest rate spread which is the difference between the average yield earned on our interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on our interest-bearing liabilities. The interest rate spread is impacted by interest rates, deposit flows, and loan demand. Additionally, our profitability is affected by such factors as the level of non-interest income and expenses, the provision for credit losses, and the effective tax rate. Non-interest income consists primarily of service fees on deposit accounts and related services, and also includes commissions earned on bond sales, brokering single family home loans, sale of mutual funds, annuities and other non traditional and non insured investments. Non-interest expense consists of compensation, employee benefits, occupancy and equipment expenses, and other operating expenses.

Our two subsidiary banks operate through 53 bank branch locations in fourteen Counties in central Florida, including the four branches acquired from TD Bank, N.A. during January 2010, as summarized in the table below:

 

Subsidiary Banks

   No. of
locations
    

Counties

CenterState Bank of Florida (“CSB”)

   49      Citrus, Hendry, Hernando, Indian River, Lake, Marion, Okeechobee, Osceola, Orange, Pasco, Polk, Sumter, Putnam

Valrico State Bank (“VSB”)

     5      Hillsborough

Correspondent banking division

We also operate a correspondent banking and bond sales division. The division is integrated with and part of our lead subsidiary bank, CSB, located in Winter Haven, Florida, although the majority of our bond salesmen, traders and operations personnel are physically housed in leased facilities located in Birmingham, Alabama and Atlanta, Georgia. The business lines of this division are primarily divided into three inter-related revenue generating activities. The first, and largest, revenue generator is commissions earned on fixed income security sales. The second category includes: (a) correspondent bank deposits (i.e., federal funds purchased) and (b) correspondent bank checking accounts. The third, and smallest revenue generating category, includes fees from safe-keeping activities, bond accounting services for correspondents, and asset/liability consulting related activities. The customer base includes small to medium size financial institutions primarily located in Florida, Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia.

FDIC assisted acquisitions and other branching activities

We closed three small branches during 2009 and transferred the deposit and loan accounts to other existing branches. We did not open any new branches during 2009. However, we acquired four additional branches with $178 million of deposits pursuant to a FDIC assisted transaction on January 30, 2009. No loans were included in the assisted acquisition, but subsequently we selected and purchased approximately $18 million of performing loans from the FDIC at par without loss share protection.

During 2010 we acquired three failed financial institutions through FDIC assisted transactions. These acquisitions included approximately $344 million of deposits and loans with a fair value as of the acquisition

 

30


Table of Contents

date of approximately $221 million. Substantially all the loans have loss share agreements beginning with the first dollar of loss. In total, these three acquisitions included nine branch locations, all within or contiguous with our current geographical market footprint.

Also during 2010, we hired a seasoned and experienced management team in the Vero Beach, Florida area, and opened a new branch around this team. Similarly, we also hired another seasoned and experienced management team in the Okeechobee, Florida area, and opened a new branch around this team as well.

In January 2011 we closed on a previously announced transaction with TD Bank, N.A. whereby we acquired four branches in Putnam County, Florida. Total deposits acquired approximated $114 million of which we did not pay a premium. In addition, we selected and purchased approximately $121 million of performing loans located within our fourteen county market area in central Florida. We purchased the loans for 90% of the legal unpaid balance and have an option during the initial two year period to put back any loan that becomes past due greater than thirty days or becomes classified pursuant to banking regulation guidelines.

Capital offering

During the third quarter of 2009 we raised additional capital through a public stock offering. We sold a total of 13,271,000 common shares at $6.50 per share. After investment banking fees and other expenses, the net increase to our common equity was approximately $81 million. About a year later, during the third quarter of 2010 we again raised additional capital through another public stock offering. We sold a total of 4,140,000 common shares at $8.50 per share. After investment banking fees and other expenses, the net increase to our common equity was approximately $33 million. These capital raises were both offensive and defensive in nature. We used them to support our growth from the acquisitions discussed above, as well as a buffer against losses and potential losses in our loan portfolio resulting from the significant downturn in the Florida real estate market. We also used a portion of this capital to redeem the TARP preferred shares and warrants in 2009.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our accounting policies are integral to understanding the results reported. Accounting policies are described in detail in Note 1 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The critical accounting policies require management’s judgment to ascertain the valuation of assets, liabilities, commitments and contingencies. We have established policies and control procedures that are intended to ensure valuation methods are well controlled and applied consistently from period to period. In addition, the policies and procedures are intended to ensure that the process for changing methodologies occurs in an appropriate manner. The following is a brief description of our current accounting policies involving significant management valuation judgments.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses represents our estimate of probable incurred losses inherent in the existing loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses charged to expense and reduced by loans charged off, net of recoveries. The allowance for loan losses is determined based on our assessment of several factors: reviews and evaluation of individual loans, changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and the related impact on specific borrowers and industry concentrations, historical loan loss experiences and the level of classified and nonperforming loans.

Changes in the financial condition of individual borrowers, in economic conditions, in historical loss experience and in the condition of the various markets in which collateral may be sold may all affect the required level of the allowance for loan losses and the associated provision for loan losses.

A standardized loan grading system is utilized at each of our subsidiary banks. The grading system is integral to our risk assessment function related to lending. Loan officers of each bank assign a loan grade to their

 

31


Table of Contents

newly originated loans in accordance with the standard loan grades. Throughout the lending relationship, the loan officer is responsible for periodic reviews, and if warranted he/she will downgrade or upgrade a particular loan based on specific events and/or analyses. We use a loan grading system of 1 through 7. Grade 1 is “excellent” and grade 7 is “doubtful.” Loans graded 5 or higher are placed on a watch list each month end and reported to that particular bank’s board of directors. Our loan review officer, who is independent of the lending function and is not an employee of any subsidiary bank, periodically reviews each bank’s loan portfolio and lending relationships. The officer may disagree with a particular bank’s grade on a particular loan and subsequently downgrade or upgrade such loan(s) based on his risk analysis. As such, our lending process is decentralized, but our credit review process is centralized.

Beginning in late 2007, our CEO initiated a new program referred to as “Centercourt,” whereby all of our bank presidents and our chief lending officers are gathered together in one room along with our CEO, CFO, COO and Chief Loan Review officer. Each bank president and chief lending officer present their prepared written report on the status of their bank’s loan portfolio. Past due, non accrual, impaired, potentially impaired, and loans in process of foreclosure, as well as OREO issues are presented and discussed. These meetings are generally held once per quarter. The objectives include early and quick identification and resolutions of potential loan losses, as well as sharing information and ideas between banks. The process also contributes to each bank’s allowance for loan loss analysis assumptions and preparation.

We maintain an allowance for loan losses that we believe is adequate to absorb probable incurred losses inherent in our loan portfolio. The allowance consists of two components. The first component consists of amounts specifically reserved (“specific allowance”) for specific loans identified as impaired, as defined by FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 310 (“ASC 310”). Impaired loans are those loans that management has estimated will not repay as agreed upon. Each of these loans is required to have a written analysis supporting the amount of specific reserve allocated to the particular loan, if any. That is to say, a loan may be impaired (i.e. not expected to repay as agreed), but may be sufficiently collateralized such that we expect to recover all principle and interest eventually, and therefore no specific reserve is warranted.

The second component is a general reserve (“general allowance”) on all of the Company’s loans other than those identified as impaired. We group these loans into categories with similar characteristics and then apply a loss factor to each group which is derived from our historical loss factor for that category adjusted for current internal and external environmental factors, as well as for certain loan grading factors. The aggregate of these two components results in our total allowance for loan losses.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill resulting from business combinations prior to January 1, 2009 represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill resulting from business combinations after January 1, 2009, is generally determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually. The Company has selected November 30 as the date to perform the annual impairment test. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite life on our balance sheet.

Other intangible assets consist of core deposit intangible assets arising from whole bank and branch acquisitions. They are initially measure at the fair value and then amortized on an accelerated method over their estimated useful lives, generally 10 years.

Goodwill and intangible assets are described further in Note 9 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

32


Table of Contents

Deferred Tax Asset

A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is required when it is considered more likely than not (greater than 50% probability) that all or part of the benefit related to such assets will not be realized. Income tax expense (or benefit) is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax basis of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws. In determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary, we consider the level of taxable income in prior years to the extent that carrybacks are permitted under current tax laws, as well as estimates of future pre-tax and taxable income and tax planning strategies that would, if necessary, be implemented. We expect to realize our deferred tax asset over the allowable carryforward periods. Therefore, no valuation allowance is deemed necessary against our deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2010. However, if an unanticipated event occurred that materially changed pre-tax and taxable income in future periods, a valuation allowance may become necessary.

COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009.

Net Income

Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $5,543,000 or $0.20 loss per share basic and diluted, compared to net loss of $6,217,000, or $0.47 loss per share basic and diluted for the year ended December 31, 2009.

This was our second consecutive year we reported losses, and in both years the primary underlying reason was related to credit costs, which is a reflection of the continued deterioration of the real estate market in Florida. Although our overall credit cost was higher in 2010 versus 2009, our net loss was lower, due to a variety of other factors including higher commissions earned on correspondent banking bond sales, higher gain on sale of securities available for sale, a bargain purchase gain from one of our FDIC assisted transactions, and earnings growth from the acquisitions during the year. These and other factors contributing to our 2010 results are discussed below.

Net Interest Income/Margin

Net interest income consists of interest income generated by earning assets, less interest expense.

Net interest income increased $6,184,000 or 12% to $57,838,000 during the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $51,654,000 for the same period in 2009. The increase was the result of a $636,000 increase in interest income plus a $5,548,000 decrease in interest expense.

Interest earning assets averaged $1,734,746,000 during the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to $1,628,798,000 for the same period in 2009, an increase of $105,948,000, or 6.5%. The yield on average interest earning assets decreased 24 basis points (“bps”) to 4.30% (24bps to 4.34% tax equivalent basis) during the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to 4.54% (4.58% tax equivalent basis) for the same period in 2009. The combined net effects of the $105,948,000 increase in average interest earning assets and the 24bps decrease in yield on average interest earning assets resulted in the $636,000 ($668,000 tax equivalent basis) increase in interest income between the two years.

Interest bearing liabilities averaged $1,369,417,000 during the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to $1,346,051,000 for the same period in 2009, an increase of $23,366,000, or 1.7%. The cost of average interest bearing liabilities decreased 44bps to 1.22% during the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to 1.66% for the same period in 2009. The combined net effects of the $23,366,000 increase in average interest bearing

 

33


Table of Contents

liabilities and the 44bps decrease in cost of average interest bearing liabilities resulted in the $5,548,000 decrease in interest expense between the two years. See the tables “Average Balances—Yields & Rates,” and “Analysis of Changes in Interest Income and Expenses” below.

Average Balances(8)—Yields & Rates

(Dollars are in thousands)

 

    Years Ended December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    Average
Balance
    Interest
Inc / Exp
    Average
Rate
    Average
Balance
    Interest
Inc / Exp
    Average
Rate
 

ASSETS:

           

Noncovered loans (1) (2) (7)

  $ 940,198      $ 51,651        5.49   $ 923,080      $ 53,528        5.80

Covered loans (9)

    83,399        4,159        4.99     —          —          —     

Securities available for sale—taxable

    524,336        16,833        3.21     475,160        18,436        3.88

Securities available for sale—tax exempt (7)

    34,852        2,069        5.94     36,634        2,098        5.73

Federal funds sold and other

    151,961        626        0.41     193,924        608        0.31
                                               

TOTAL INTEREST EARNING ASSETS

  $ 1,734,746      $ 75,338        4.34   $ 1,628,798      $ 74,670        4.58

Allowance for loan losses

    (25,578         (15,958    

All other assets

    226,327            158,194       
                       

TOTAL ASSETS

  $ 1,935,495          $ 1,771,034       
                       

LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

           

Deposits:

           

Now

  $ 217,083      $ 868        0.40   $ 167,269      $ 849        0.51

Money market

    190,778        1,486        0.78     152,005        1,960        1.29

Savings

    177,632        1,165        0.66     119,768        1,197        1.00

Time deposits

    628,942        12,203        1.94     608,394        16,515        2.71

Repurchase agreements

    21,254        89        0.42     24,276        100        0.41

Federal funds purchased

    105,344        107        0.10     228,815        553        0.24

Other borrowed funds (3)

    15,884        403        2.54     33,024        643        1.95

Corporate debenture (4)

    12,500        421        3.37     12,500        473        3.78
                                               

TOTAL INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES

  $ 1,369,417        16,742        1.22   $ 1,346,051      $ 22,290        1.66

Demand deposits

    302,867            206,733       

Other liabilities

    20,148            11,336       

Total stockholders’ equity

    243,063            206,914       
                       

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  $ 1,935,495          $ 1,771,034       
                       

NET INTEREST SPREAD (tax equivalent basis) (5)

        3.12         2.92
                       

NET INTEREST INCOME (tax equivalent basis)

    $ 58,596          $ 52,380     
                       

NET INTEREST MARGIN (tax equivalent basis) (6)

        3.38         3.22
                       

 

(1) Loan balances are net of deferred origination fees and costs. Non accrual loans are included in total loan balances.

 

34


Table of Contents
(2) Interest income on average loans includes loan fee recognition of $293 and $432 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(3) Includes short-term (usually overnight) Federal Home Loan Bank advances, Federal Funds Purchased and correspondent bank deposits (Federal Funds Purchased).
(4) Includes net amortization of origination costs and amortization of purchase accounting adjustment of $0 and ($19) during year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(5) Represents the average rate earned on interest earning assets minus the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities.
(6) Represents net interest income divided by total earning assets.
(7) Interest income and rates include the effects of a tax equivalent adjustment using applicable statutory tax rates to adjust tax exempt investment income on tax exempt investment securities and loans to a fully taxable basis.
(8) Averages balances are average daily balances.
(9) Covered loans are loans purchased from the FDIC pursuant to assisted acquisitions of failed financial institutions, and are covered with respect to certain loss sharing agreements with the FDIC.

Analysis of Changes in Interest Income and Expenses

(Dollars are in thousands)

 

     Net Change Dec 31, 2010 versus 2009  
       Volume             Rate         Net
Change
 

INTEREST INCOME

      

Loans (tax equivalent basis)

   $ 5,604      $ (3,322   $ 2,282   

Securities available for sale—taxable

     1,785        (3,388     (1,603

Securities available for sale—tax exempt

     (104     75        (29

Federal funds sold and other

     (148     166        18   
                        

TOTAL INTEREST INCOME (tax equivalent basis)

   $ 7,137      $ (6,469   $ 668   
                        

INTEREST EXPENSE

      

Deposits

      

NOW accounts

   $ 222      $ (203   $ 19   

Money market accounts

     422        (896     (474

Savings

     462        (494     (32

Time deposits

     541        (4,853     (4,312

Repurchase agreements

     (13     2        (11

Federal funds purchased

     (215     (231     (446

Other borrowed funds

     (398     158        (240

Corporate debenture

     —          (52     (52
                        

TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE

   $ 1,021      $ (6,569   $ (5,548
                        

NET INTEREST INCOME (tax equivalent basis)

   $ 6,116      $ 100      $ 6,216   
                        

The table above details the components of the changes in net interest income for the last two years. For each major category of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, information is provided with respect to changes due to average volume and changes due to rates, with the changes in both volumes and rates allocated to these two categories based on the proportionate absolute changes in each category.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses (expense) increased $5,728,000, to $29,624,000 during the year ending December 31, 2010 compared to $23,896,000 for the comparable period in 2009. Our policy is to maintain the

 

35


Table of Contents

allowance for loan losses at a level sufficient to absorb probable incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses, which is a charge to current period earnings, and is decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries on prior loan charge-offs. Therefore, the provision for loan losses (Income Statement effect) is a residual of management’s determination of allowance for loan losses (Balance Sheet approach). In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, we consider those levels maintained by conditions of individual borrowers, the historical loan loss experience, the general economic environment, the overall portfolio composition, and other information. As these factors change, the level of loan loss provision changes. See “credit quality and allowance for loan losses” regarding the allowance for loan losses for additional information.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $55,566,000 compared to $30,052,000 for the comparable period in 2009. This increase was the result of the following components listed in the table below (amounts listed are in thousands of dollars).

 

(in thousands of dollars)

   2010      2009      $ increase
(decrease)
    % increase
(decrease)
 

Service charges on deposit accounts

   $ 6,873       $ 5,450       $ 1,423        26.1

Income from correspondent banking and bond sales division

     32,696         17,916         14,780        82.5

Correspondent banking division—other fees

     996         403         593        147.1

Commissions from sale of mutual funds and annuities

     1,118         532         586        110.2

Debit card and ATM fees

     1,890         1,341         549        40.9

Loan related fees

     534         452         82        18.1

BOLI income

     774         550         224        40.7

Trading securities revenue

     622         427         195        45.6

FDIC indemnification asset-accretion of discount rate

     598         —           598        n/a   

Other service charges and fees

     421         465         (44     (9.5 %) 

Gain on sale of securities

     7,034         2,516         4,518        179.6
                                  

Subtotal

   $ 53,556       $ 30,052       $ 23,504        78.2

Bargain purchase gain, acquisition of failed institution

     2,010         —           2,010        n/a   
                                  

Total non-interest income

   $ 55,566       $ 30,052       $ 25,514        84.9
                                  

As shown in the table above, the primary reasons for the increase in non interest income year to year was the significant revenue growth in the correspondent banking division, the increased gain on sale of securities available for sale, the bargain purchase gain from one of the FDIC assisted acquisitions, and the overall growth in fee revenue due to the business growth from the three FDIC assisted acquisitions.

The correspondent banking bond sales division had an outstanding year most of which can be attributed to a record third quarter. We expect significant volatility in the fixed income business, and therefore do not consider their initial three year performance necessarily a trend.

We sold a significant amount of securities available for sale during the current year pursuant to our asset/liability management process. We manage our balance sheet with the objectives of lowering our overall cost of deposits and freeing up additional capital. As we shrink higher cost time deposits, the release on the asset side of the balance sheet is security sales. With a slightly smaller balance sheet, as well as improving margins, results in excess capital to deploy on additional acquisitions, which tend to produce substantially higher rates of returns than a small incremental net interest income margin. We do not know if we will be successful with additional acquisitions, and if we do shrink the balance sheet with security sales, we do not know what future interest rates will be and therefore uncertain as what potential gains, if any, could be expected.

 

36


Table of Contents

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 increased $24,611,000, or 35.8%, to $93,325,000, compared to $68,714,000 for 2009. The table below breaks down the individual components. Amounts are in thousands of dollars.

 

(in thousands of dollars)

   2010     2009     $ increase
(decrease)
    % increase
(decrease)
 

Employee salaries and wages

   $ 44,985      $ 29,955      $ 15,030        50.2

Employee incentive/bonus compensation

     3,620        2,223        1,397        62.8

Employee stock based compensation

     699        419        280        66.8

Employer 401K matching contributions

     814        538        276        51.3

Deferred compensation expense

     342        233        109        46.8

Health insurance and other employee benefits

     2,208        1,869        339        18.1

Payroll taxes

     2,373        1,714        659        38.4

Other employee related expenses

     594        439        155        35.3

Incremental direct cost of loan origination

     (602     (720     118        (16.4 %) 
                                

Total salaries, wages and employee benefits

   $ 55,033      $ 36,670      $ 18,363        50.1

Occupancy expense

     6,652        5,375        1,277        23.8

Depreciation of premises and equipment

     3,350        2,882        468        16.2

Supplies, stationary and printing

     1,091        848        243        28.7

Marketing expenses

     2,498        1,910        588        30.8

Data processing expense

     2,789        2,417        372        15.4

Legal, auditing and other professional fees

     2,995        2,354        641        27.2

FDIC acquisition expenses

     769        —          769        n/a   

Bank regulatory related expenses

     2,989        3,114        (125     (4.0 %) 

Postage and delivery

     735        425        310        72.9

ATM and debit card related expenses

     1,298        1,060        238        22.5

CDI amortization

     519        792        (273     (34.5 %) 

CDI impairment

     —          1,200        (1,200     n/a   

Impairment of excess bank owned land held for sale

     74        939        (865     (92.1 %) 

Loss on sale of repossessed real estate (“OREO”)

     756        772        (16     (2.1 %) 

Valuation write down of repossessed real estate (“OREO”)

     2,951        2,188        763        34.9

Loss on repossessed assets other than real estate

     458        544        (86     (15.8 %) 

Foreclosure related expenses

     2,113        1,049        1,064        101.4

Internet and telephone banking

     679        499        180        36.1

Operational write-offs and losses

     920        225        695        308.9

Correspondent accounts and Federal Reserve charges

     348        319        29        9.1

Conferences/Seminars/Education/Training

     807        392        415        105.9

Director fees

     368        332        36        10.8

Travel expenses

     561        463        98        21.2

Other expenses

     2,572        1,945        627        32.2
                                

Total non-interest expense

   $ 93,325      $ 68,714      $ 24,611        35.8
                                

Overall, our non interest expenses increased significantly due primarily to the following:

 

   

significant increase in variable compensation at our correspondent banking division related to increase sales volume;

 

   

hired a team of experienced seasoned bankers and opened a denovo branch for them in Vero Beach, Florida;

 

37


Table of Contents
   

hired another team of experienced seasoned bankers and opened a denovo branch for them in Okeechobee, Florida;

 

   

acquired three failed financial institutions pursuant to FDIC assisted transactions; the three FDIC failed banks have not yet been converted and merged into our lead bank causing our lead bank to operate on four different core processing systems adding elevated cost in terms of data processing, personnel and other temporary inefficiencies;

 

   

converted three of our subsidiary banks to a new enhanced data processing system;

 

   

merged three of our banks in December 2010;

 

   

temporarily carried a conversion team of employee bankers with different specialties whose sole purpose is to focus on conversions, mergers and due diligence projects;

 

   

created and significantly upgraded our Special Asset Disposition (“SAD”) department to work through our troubled assets in our loan portfolio and OREO; and,

 

   

hired additional management and senior level staff including an economist, wealth management salesmen, managerial level staffing in loan operations, deposit operations, accounting and finance.

Our largest non interest expense is employee and employee related expenses. Total salaries, wages and employee benefits for 2010 accounted for 59% of our total non-interest expense, and 53% for 2009. Referring to the table above, employee salaries and wages increased by $15,030,000, or 50.2% to $44,985,000 for 2010, compared to $29,955,000 for 2009. The increase was primarily due to the increase in variable compensation at our correspondent banking division. The majority of employee salaries and wage expense from the correspondent banking division is related to commissions on bond sales, which is all variable based. The expense for 2010 was approximately $22,184,000 compared to $12,022,000 for 2009, an increase of $10,162,000 or 85%. The increase was primarily, but not completely, related to the increase in sales. Gross commissions from sales of fixed income securities was approximately $32,696,000 in 2010 compared to $17,916,000 in 2009, an increase of $14,780,000, or 83%.

Excluding the correspondent banking division, discussed above, total salaries and wage expense was approximately $22,801,000 for 2010 compared to $17,933,000 for 2009, an increase of 27%. This increase was due to the increase in full time equivalent employees (“FTEs”), excluding the correspondent banking division. At the end of 2010 we had approximately 602 FTEs, however, since most of the new employees were added mid year, the average FTEs for 2010 is approximately 550. In addition, our average cost per FTE, excluding the correspondent division, increased from $44,000 in 2009 to $47,000 in 2010 because many of the additional hires discussed above are managerial levels, and has added some upward pressure to our averages. The table below summarizes the above discussion. In addition, year 2008 is also included in the table below for reference only. Additional discussion comparing 2009 and 2008 is included later in our discussion under the topic, Non-Interest Expense, comparing 2009 versus 2008.

 

(in thousands of dollars)

   Year 2010     Year 2009     Year 2008  

Employee salary and wages

   $ 44,985      $ 29,955      $ 17,172   

Remove correspondent banking division salary and wages

     (22,184     (12,022     (674
                        

Employee salary and wages, excluding correspondent banking division

   $ 22,801      $ 17,933      $ 16,498   
                        

Total average FTEs

     550.0        447.7        388.2   

Remove correspondent banking division average FTEs

     (61.0     (38.1     (2.8
                        

Average FTEs excluding correspondent banking division

     489.0        409.6        385.4   
                        

Cost per average FTE, excluding correspondent banking division

   $ 47      $ 44      $ 43   
                        

 

38


Table of Contents

We use a combination of performance incentive/bonus guidelines to motivate our employees and influence behavior. These are primarily tied to earnings performance and growth metrics at each business unit. As our net income increases and our assets grow, our employee incentive/bonus compensation also increases. In addition, we also have incentive compensation programs tied to growth of core deposits for certain employee classes responsible for these types of deposit customer relationships. Although we reported a net loss for 2010 on a consolidated basis, two of our banks were profitable. In addition, our performance guidelines reward balance sheet growth as well, up to certain levels. As a result, several business units qualified for an incentive award. Approximately 91% of the $3,620,000 employee incentive/bonus compensation recognized during 2010 relates to our largest subsidiary bank, CSB, excluding the employees from the other two national chartered banks that were merged into it during December 2010. The remaining 9% was dispersed among most of the remaining business units and several of the senior corporate officers. See our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in our current year’s Proxy Statement for a discussion of executive compensation.

During 2010 our occupancy expense increased by $1,277,000, or 23.8% and our depreciation expense increased by $468,000, or 16.2% compared to 2009. This increase was due to the nine additional offices we acquired and the two denovo branches discussed above.

Marketing expenses increased by $588,000, or 30.8% year to year. Most of this increase relates to the continued checking account marketing campaign as well as an effort to develop internet related marking programs. In addition, we have grown in geographical markets as our branch network continues to grow.

Data processing expenses increased by $372,000, or 15.4% during 2010 compared to 2009. This increase was primarily due to conversion and merger related activities and adding additional offices.

The increase in the line item legal, accounting and other professional expenses was primarily due to consulting fees paid for services relating to managing foreclosure and repossessed properties, outsourcing fees related to certain internal audit functions, and increases in legal fees associated with various new and potentially new business lines and various regulatory issues.

Loss from the sale of repossessed real estate, loss from the write down in valuation of repossessed real estate and losses from other repossessed assets as well as foreclosure related expenses as a group was $6,278,000 during 2010 compared to $4,553,000 during 2009, resulting in an increase of $1,725,000, or 37.9%. The increase is reflective of the continuing deterioration in the real estate market in central Florida and the economy in general.

Income Tax (Benefit)/Provision

We recognized an income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2010 of $4,002,000 (an effective tax rate of 41.9%) compared to an income tax benefit of $4,687,000 (an effective tax rate of 43.0%) for the year ended December 31, 2009. The reason our effective tax rates are higher than our statutory tax rate is because we had substantial tax exempt income in excess of non deductible expenses thereby increasing our taxable loss substantially above our book loss as recorded in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. The table below demonstrates this difference.

 

(in thousands of dollars)

   Year 2010     Year 2009  

loss before provision for income taxes

   $ (9,545   $ (10,904

net tax exempt income

     (1,090     (1,551
                

taxable loss

     (10,635     (12,455

statutory income tax rates

     37.63     37.63
                

income tax benefit

   $ (4,002   $ (4,687
                

effective tax rates

     41.9     43.0
                

 

39


Table of Contents

COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008.

Net Income

Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $6,217,000 or $0.47 loss per share basic and diluted, compared to net income of $3,421,000, or $0.26 earnings per share basic and diluted for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The primary reasons for the decrease in 2009 earnings compared to 2008, was the increase in our loan loss provision ($23,896,000 versus $6,520,000), and an increase in our other credit related expenses ($4,553,000 versus $1,006,000), both of which were reflections of the continued deterioration of the real estate market in Florida specifically and the overall economy in general. These and other factors contributing to our 2009 net loss are discussed below.

Net Interest Income/Margin

Net interest income consists of interest income generated by earning assets, less interest expense.

Net interest income increased $11,369,000 or 28% to $51,654,000 during the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $40,285,000 for the same period in 2008. The increase was the result of a $5,862,000 increase in interest income plus a $5,507,000 decrease in interest expense.

Interest earning assets averaged $1,628,798,000 during the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to $1,108,180,000 for the same period in 2008, an increase of $520,618,000, or 47%. The yield on average interest earning assets decreased 160 basis points (“bps”) to 4.54% (162bps to 4.58% tax equivalent basis) during the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 6.14% (6.20% tax equivalent basis) for the same period in 2008. The combined net effects of the $520,618,000 increase in average interest earning assets and the 160bps decrease in yield on average interest earning assets resulted in the $5,862,000 ($5,924,000 tax equivalent basis) increase in interest income between the two years.

Interest bearing liabilities averaged $1,346,051,000 during the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to $923,591,000 for the same period in 2008, an increase of $422,460,000, or 46%. The cost of average interest bearing liabilities decreased 135bps to 1.66% during the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 3.01% for the same period in 2008. The combined net effects of the $422,460,000 increase in average interest bearing liabilities and the 135bps decrease in cost of average interest bearing liabilities resulted in the $5,507,000 decrease in interest expense between the two years. See the tables “Average Balances—Yields & Rates,” and “Analysis of Changes in Interest Income and Expenses” below.

 

40


Table of Contents

Average Balances(8)—Yields & Rates

(Dollars are in thousands)

 

     Years Ended December 31,  
     2009     2008  
     Average     Interest      Average     Average     Interest      Average  
     Balance     Inc / Exp      Rate     Balance     Inc / Exp      Rate  

ASSETS:

              

Loans (1) (2) (7)

   $ 923,080      $ 53,528         5.80   $ 856,260      $ 57,519         6.72

Securities available for sale—taxable

     475,160        18,436         3.88     154,270        7,822         5.07

Securities available for sale—tax exempt (7)

     36,634        2,098         5.73     38,070        2,060         5.41

Federal funds sold and other

     193,924        608         0.31     59,580        1,345         2.26
                                                  

TOTAL INTEREST EARNING ASSETS

   $ 1,628,798      $ 74,670         4.58   $ 1,108,180      $ 68,746         6.20

Allowance for loan losses

     (15,958          (11,750     

All other assets

     158,194             141,575        
                          

TOTAL ASSETS

   $ 1,771,034           $ 1,238,005        
                          

LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

              

Deposits:

              

Now

   $ 167,269      $ 849         0.51   $ 141,756      $ 953         0.67

Money market

     152,005        1,960         1.29     112,957        2,298         2.03

Savings

     119,768        1,197         1.00     67,215        733         1.09

Time deposits

     608,394        16,515         2.71     501,193        20,952         4.18

Repurchase agreements

     24,276        100         0.41     30,818        459         1.49

Other borrowed funds (3)

     261,839        1,196         0.46     57,152        1,584         2.77

Corporate debenture (4)

     12,500        473         3.78     12,500        818         6.54
                                                  

TOTAL INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES

   $ 1,346,051      $ 22,290         1.66   $ 923,591      $ 27,797         3.01

Demand deposits

     206,733             152,231        

Other liabilities

     11,336             7,662        

Total stockholders’ equity

     206,914             154,521        
                          

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   $ 1,771,034           $ 1,238,005        
                          

NET INTEREST SPREAD (tax equivalent
basis) (5)

          2.92          3.19
                          

NET INTEREST INCOME (tax equivalent
basis)

     $ 52,380           $ 40,949      
                          

NET INTEREST MARGIN (tax equivalent
basis) (6)

          3.22          3.70
                          

 

(1) Loan balances are net of deferred origination fees and costs. Non accrual loans are included in total loan balances.
(2) Interest income on average loans includes loan fee recognition of $432 and $336 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
(3) Includes short-term (usually overnight) Federal Home Loan Bank advances, Federal Funds Purchased and correspondent bank deposits (Federal Funds Purchased).
(4) Includes net amortization of origination costs and amortization of purchase accounting adjustment of ($19) and ($1) during year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

41


Table of Contents
(5) Represents the average rate earned on interest earning assets minus the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities.
(6) Represents net interest income divided by total earning assets.
(7) Interest income and rates include the effects of a tax equivalent adjustment using applicable statutory tax rates to adjust tax exempt investment income on tax exempt investment securities and loans to a fully taxable basis.
(8) Averages balances are average daily balances.

Analysis of Changes in Interest Income and Expenses

(Dollars are in thousands)

 

     Net Change Dec 31, 2009 versus 2008  
       Volume             Rate         Net
Change
 

INTEREST INCOME

      

Loans (tax equivalent basis)

   $ 4,266      $ (8,257   $ (3,991

Securities available for sale—taxable

     12,838        (2,224     10,614   

Securities available for sale—tax exempt

     (79     117        38   

Federal funds sold and other

     1,143        (1,880     (737
                        

TOTAL INTEREST INCOME (tax equivalent basis)

   $ 18,168      $ (12,244   $ 5,924   
                        

INTEREST EXPENSE

      

Deposits

      

NOW accounts

   $ 154      $ (258   $ (104

Money market accounts

     653        (991     (338

Savings

     530        (66     464   

Time deposits

     3,886        (8,323     (4,437

Repurchase agreements

     (81     (278     (359

Other borrowed funds

     1,831        (2,219     (388

Corporate debenture

     —          (345     (345
                        

TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE

   $ 6,973      $ (12,480   $ (5,507
                        

NET INTEREST INCOME (tax equivalent basis)

   $ 11,195      $ 236      $ 11,431   
                        

The table above details the components of the changes in net interest income for the last two years. For each major category of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, information is provided with respect to changes due to average volume and changes due to rates, with the changes in both volumes and rates allocated to these two categories based on the proportionate absolute changes in each category.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses (expense) increased $17,376,000, to $23,896,000 during the year ending December 31, 2009 compared to $6,520,000 for the comparable period in 2008. Our policy is to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level sufficient to absorb probable incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses, which is a charge to current period earnings, and is decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries on prior loan charge-offs. Therefore, the provision for loan losses (Income Statement effect) is a residual of management’s determination of allowance for loan losses (Balance Sheet approach). In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, we consider those levels maintained by conditions of individual borrowers, the historical loan loss experience, the general economic environment, the overall portfolio composition, and other information. As these factors change, the level of loan loss provision changes. See “credit quality and allowance for loan losses” regarding the allowance for loan losses for additional information.

 

42


Table of Contents

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $30,052,000 compared to $10,807,000 for the comparable period in 2008. This increase was the result of the following components listed in the table below (amounts listed are in thousands of dollars).

 

(in thousands of dollars)

   2009      2008     $ increase
(decrease)
    % Increase
(decrease)
 

Service charges on deposit accounts

   $ 5,450       $ 4,490      $ 960        2.1

Commissions from bond sales

     17,916         1,412        16,504        1,168.8

Commissions from mortgage broker activities

     129         87        42        48.3

Commissions from sale of mutual funds and annuities

     532         503        29        5.8

Debit card and ATM fees

     1,341         1,075        266        24.7

Loan related fees

     452         402        50        12.4

BOLI income

     550         387        163        42.1

Trading securities revenue

     427         —          427        n/a   

Other service charges and fees

     660         320        340        106.2

Gain (loss) on sale or disposition of fixed assets

     79         (13     92        707.7

Gain on sale of securities

     2,516         661        1,855        280.6
                                 

Subtotal

   $ 30,052       $ 9,324      $ 20,728        222.3
                                 

Gain on sale of bank branch office real estate

     —           1,483        (1,483     n/a   
                                 

Total non-interest income

   $ 30,052       $ 10,807      $ 19,245        178.1
                                 

We sold one of our branch office buildings on April 1, 2008 for $2,500,000 and simultaneously entered into an agreement to lease back the real estate for a period of one year with an option to renew the lease for an additional year. We recognized a pre-tax gain on the sale of approximately $1,483,000 during April. We did not renew the lease, and closed the office on March 31, 2009. We transferred all the loan and deposit accounts to one or more of our existing offices. See “Executive Summary” for a discussion on our branching activity including this sale.

We initiated a correspondent banking division during the fourth quarter of 2008. The primary revenue generator of this new business unit is bond sales to correspondent banks. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we recognized $1,412,000 of gross revenue from commissions on bond sales. During 2009 we recognized $17,916,000 of gross revenue from commissions on bond sales. See “Executive Summary” for further discussion relating to our new correspondent banking division.

We sold approximately $202,857,000 of securities available for sale during 2009, generating a net gain on sale of $2,516,000. During the previous year we sold approximately $38,034,000 of securities available for sale generating a net gain on sale of $661,000. The sales were a result of liquidity management and asset/liability management.

During the third quarter of 2009 we initiated a trading securities portfolio at our lead subsidiary bank. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in trading securities revenue, a component of our non interest income, included in the list above. Securities purchased for this portfolio have primarily been municipal securities and are held for short periods of time. During 2009 we purchased approximately $32,714,000 of securities for this portfolio and sold all of them before the end of the year recognizing a net gain on sale of approximately $427,000. At December 31, 2009, we did not own any securities in our trading portfolio. This activity was initiated to take advantage of market opportunities, when presented, for short term revenue gains.

Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) income is up year to year primarily due to the purchase of an additional $5,000,000 of BOLI early in 2009. Many of the other normal recurring related revenue items listed above have increased year to year due to our internally generated growth as well as our purchase of additional customer

 

43


Table of Contents

relationships related to the Ocala National Bank transaction in January 2009. Commissions from mortgage broker activities is dependent on market place forces including supply and demand of single family residential property in our local markets, and the interest rate environment which primarily effects refinancing activity. Sales of mutual funds and annuities are somewhat dependent on market place forces as well, but is also related to the successful efforts of our investment sales representatives. These commissions will fluctuate period to period.

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 increased $28,778,000, or 72.1%, to $68,714,000, compared to $39,936,000 for 2008. The table below breaks down the individual components.

 

(in thousands of dollars)

   2009     2008     $ increase
(decrease)
    % Increase
(decrease)
 

Employee salaries and wages

   $ 29,955      $ 17,172      $ 12,783        74.4

Employee incentive/bonus compensation

     2,223        763        1,460        191.3

Employee stock based compensation

     419        402        17        4.2

Employer 401K matching contributions

     538        484        54        11.2

Deferred compensation expense

     233        149        84        56.4

Health insurance and other employee benefits

     1,869        1,743        126        7.2

Payroll taxes

     1,714        1,209        505        41.8

Other employee related expenses

     439        433        6        1.4

Incremental direct cost of loan origination

     (720     (871     151        (17.3 %) 
                                

Total salaries, wages and employee benefits

   $ 36,670      $ 21,484      $ 15,186        70.7

Occupancy expense

     5,375        4,143        1,232        29.7

Depreciation of premises and equipment

     2,882        2,590        292        11.3

Supplies, stationary and printing

     848        743        105        14.1

Marketing expenses

     1,910        1,359        551        40.5

Data processing expense

     2,417        1,141        1,276        111.8

Legal, auditing and other professional fees

     2,354        1,245        1,109        89.1

Bank regulatory related expenses

     3,114        1,230        1,884        153.2

Postage and delivery

     425        367        58        15.8

ATM and debit card related expenses

     1,060        724        336        46.4

CDI amortization

     792        777        15        1.9

CDI impairment

     1,200        —          1,200        —  

Impairment of excess bank owned land held for sale

     939        —          939        —  

Loss on sale of repossessed real estate (“OREO”)

     772        51        721        1,413.7

Valuation write down of repossessed real estate (“OREO”)

     2,188        434        1,754        404.1

Loss on repossessed assets other than real estate

     544        125        419        335.2

Foreclosure related expenses

     1,049        396        653        164.9

Internet and telephone banking

     499        358        141        39.4

Operational write-offs and losses

     225        291        (66     (22.7 %) 

Correspondent accounts and Federal Reserve charges

     319        263        56        21.3

Conferences/Seminars/Education/Training

     392        223        169        75.8

Director fees

     332        321        11        3.4

Other expenses

     2,408        1,671        737        44.1
                                

Total non-interest expense

   $ 68,714      $ 39,936      $ 28,778        72.1
                                

Overall, our non interest expenses increased significantly due to the growth in our business from the initiation of the correspondent banking business in Birmingham, Alabama (November 2008) and in Atlanta, Georgia (July 2009). See “Executive Summary” for a discussion relating to our new correspondent banking division. We also acquired four Ocala National Bank offices from the FDIC in January 2009. In addition to the

 

44


Table of Contents

added cost from growth, we also incurred substantially more credit related expenses this year compared to last year, due to the deterioration in real estate market. We also incurred an impairment charge relating to a core deposit intangible. Significant line items listed above are discussed in more detail below.

Our largest non interest expense is employee and employee related expenses. Total salaries, wages and employee benefits for 2009 accounted for 53% of our total non-interest expense, and 54% for 2008. Referring to the table above, employee salaries and wages increased by $12,783,000, or 74.4% to $29,955,000 for 2009, compared to $17,172,000 for 2008. The increase was primarily due to the correspondent banking division started in November 2008. The majority of employee salaries and wage expense from the correspondent banking division is related to commissions on bond sales, which is all variable based. The expense for 2009 was approximately $12,022,000 compared to $674,000 for 2008. The increase was due to a full year in 2009 versus two months for 2008 for the Birmingham office. The Atlanta office did not open until July 2009.

Excluding the correspondent banking division, discussed above, total salaries and wage expense was $17,933,000 for 2009 compared to $16,498,000 for 2008. This increase was due to the increase in full time equivalent employees (“FTEs”), excluding correspondent banking division. We closed three small branches during 2009, but acquired four larger branch offices in January 2009, which is the primary reason for the increase in FTEs, along with our internal growth. The table below summarizes the above discussion (in thousands of dollars).

 

    Year 2009     Year 2008  

Employee salary and wages

  $ 29,955      $ 17,172   

Remove correspondent banking division salary and wages

    (12,022     (674
               

Employee salary and wages, excluding correspondent banking division

  $ 17,933      $ 16,498   
               

Total average FTEs

    447.7        388.2   

Remove correspondent banking division average FTEs

    (38.1     (2.8
               

Average FTEs excluding correspondent banking division

    409.6        385.4   
               

Cost per average FTE, excluding correspondent banking division

  $ 44      $ 43   
               

We use a combination of performance incentive/bonus guidelines to motivate our employees to perform. These are primarily tied to earnings performance and growth metrics at each business unit. As our net income increases and our assets grow, our employee incentive/bonus compensation also increases. In addition, we also have incentive compensation programs tied to growth of core deposits for certain employee classes responsible for these types of deposit customer relationships. Although we reported a net loss for 2009 on a consolidated basis, two of our banks were profitable. In addition, our performance guidelines reward balance sheet growth as well, up to certain levels. As a result, several business units qualified for an incentive award. Approximately 80% of the $2,223,000 employee incentive/bonus compensation recognized during 2009 relates to our largest subsidiary bank, which is also our most profitable. The remaining 20% was dispersed among most of the remaining business units and several of the senior corporate officers.

During 2009 our occupancy expense increased by $1,232,000 (29.7%) and our depreciation expense increased by $292,000 (11.3%) compared to 2008. This increase was due to the correspondent banking division which opened an office in Birmingham in November 2008 and in Atlanta in July 2009. In addition we acquired four larger bank branch offices in Ocala in January 2009 and closed three small ones in April 2009.

Marketing expenses increased by $551,000, or 40.5% year to year. Most of this increase relates to the checking account marketing campaign which had previously been in place at one of our banks.

Data processing expenses increased by $1,276,000 (111.8%) during 2009 compared to 2008. This increase was primarily due to adding, converting and integrating our new correspondent banking division offices both in

 

45


Table of Contents

Birmingham and in Atlanta. These offices, with their Bloomberg terminals and other specialized IT equipment requirements are significantly more expensive than our average commercial bank branch office. However, in addition to converting these offices, we also converted four offices in Ocala which we purchased from the FDIC in January, after operating dual systems for almost four months during the conversion process.

The increase in the line item legal, accounting and other professional expenses was primarily due to monthly consulting fees paid relating to the correspondent banking business initiated during the fourth quarter of 2008, consulting fees paid for services relating to managing foreclosure and repossessed properties, outsourcing fees related to certain internal audit functions, and increases in legal fees associated with various lease negotiations, new and potentially new business lines and various regulatory issues.

We recognized a core deposit impairment charge related to deposits acquired in our 2006 acquisition of the former Mid Florida bank, now part of our CSNA bank. The transaction account balances decayed faster than originally expected, and as such a write down in value was required.

We also recognized an impairment charge of $939,000 related to excess bank property held for sale. This property was not acquired as a result of foreclosed loans, but was purchased by the bank for future expansion, and in one case relates to a single family home purchased by the Company several years ago, at the then appraised value, as a result of moving one of our executive officers. During the last quarter of 2009, we obtained new appraisals and wrote the properties down to estimated market values based on these appraised values less estimated cost to sell.

Bank regulatory expenses, including deposit insurance expense, increased by $1,884,000, or 153.2% in 2009 compared to 2008. This increase was a result of increased deposit insurance premiums, which were a result of increased rates and growth in deposits, and a special assessment levied by the FDIC of approximately $800,000 during the second quarter of 2009. In December 2009, each of our banks were required to prepay a three year insurance premium, which in the aggregate is approximately $6,855,000 and is included in prepaid expenses and other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Loss from the sale of repossessed real estate, loss from the write down in valuation of repossessed real estate and losses from other repossessed assets as well as foreclosure related expenses as a group was $4,553,000 during 2009 compared to $1,006,000 during 2008, resulting in an increase of $3,547,000, or 353%. The increase was reflective of the deterioration in the real estate market in central Florida and the economy in general.

Income Tax (Benefit)/Provision

We recognized an income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2009 of $4,687,000 (an effective tax rate of 43.0%) compared to an income tax provision (expense) of $1,215,000 (an effective tax rate of 26.2%) for the year ended December 31, 2008. The reason 2009’s effective tax rate was higher than our statutory tax rate is because we had substantial tax exempt income in excess of non deductible expenses thereby increasing our taxable loss substantially above our book loss as recorded in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. The primary reason for the difference in effective tax rates between the two years is that we went from a relative small pre-tax income amount in 2008 to a much larger pre-tax loss in 2009. The table below demonstrates this difference.

 

(in thousands of dollars)

   Year 2009     Year 2008  

(loss) income before provision for income taxes

   $ (10,904   $ 4,636   

net tax exempt income

     (1,551     (1,408
                

taxable (loss) income

     (12,455     3,228   

statutory income tax rates

     37.63     37.63
                

income tax (benefit) provision

   $ (4,687   $ 1,215   
                

effective tax rates

     43.0     26.2
                

 

46


Table of Contents

COMPARISON OF BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009

Overview

Our total assets grew by $312,020,000, or 18%, from $1,751,299,000 at December 31, 2009 to $2,063,319,000 at December 31, 2010. The increase was the result of our three failed bank acquisitions from the FDIC.

Investment securities available for sale

We account for our securities at fair value and classify them as available for sale, except for trading securities. Unrealized holding gains and losses are included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of the effect of deferred income taxes.

If our management intends to sell or it is more likely than not we will be required to sell the security before recovery of our amortized cost basis, less any current period credit loss, the other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) will be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If our management does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period loss, the OTTI will be separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the total OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of the investment. The assessment of whether an OTTI decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in time.

Our available for sale portfolio totaled $500,927,000 at December 31, 2010 and $463,186,000 at December 31, 2009, or 24% and 26%, respectively, of total assets. See the tables below for a summary of security type, maturity and average yield distributions.

We use our security portfolio primarily as a tool to manage our balance sheet, manage our regulatory capital ratios, as a source of liquidity and a base from which to pledge assets for repurchase agreements and public deposits. When our liquidity position exceeds expected loan demand, other investments are considered as a secondary earnings alternative. Typically, we remain short-term in our decision to invest in certain securities. As these investments mature, they will be used to meet cash needs or will be reinvested to maintain a desired liquidity position. We have designated all of our securities as available for sale, except our trading portfolio, to provide flexibility, in case an immediate need for liquidity arises. We believe the composition of the portfolio offers flexibility in managing our liquidity position and interest rate sensitivity, without adversely impacting our regulatory capital levels. The available for sale portfolio is carried at fair market value and had a net unrealized gain of approximately $4,675,000 at December 31, 2010, compared to a net unrealized gain of approximately $11,502,000 at December 31, 2009.

We invest primarily in direct obligations of the United States, obligations guaranteed as to the principal and interest by the United States, mortgage backed securities, municipal securities and obligations of government sponsored entities and agencies of the United States. The Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Home Loan Bank also require equity investments to be maintained by us, which are shown separately in our consolidated balance sheet.

 

47


Table of Contents

The tables below summarize the maturity distribution of securities, weighted average yield by range of maturities, and distribution of securities for the periods provided (dollars are in thousands).

 

    One year
or less
    Over one through
five years
    Over five
through ten years
    Over ten years     Total  
     $     %     $     %     $     %     $     %     $     %  

AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE

                   

US government sponsored entities and agencies

  $ —          —     $ 22,641        1.57   $ 64,332        2.51   $ 26,443        2.88   $ 113,416        2.41

State, county, & municipal

    —          —       825        3.75     4,739        3.94     27,689        4.08     33,253        4.05

Mortgage-backed securities

    3,177        4.96     3,942        4.95     67,096        4.23     280,043        4.74     354,258        4.65
                                                                               

Total

  $ 3,177        4.96   $ 27,408        2.11   $ 136,167        3.40   $ 334,175        4.54   $ 500,927        4.10
                                                                               

Distribution of Investment Securities

(Dollars are in thousands)

 

     December 31, 2010      December 31, 2009      December 31, 2008  
      Amortized
Cost
     Fair
Value
     Amortized
Cost
     Fair
Value
     Amortized
Cost
     Fair
Value
 

AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE

                 

US treasury securities

   $ —         $ —         $ —         $ —         $ 1,001       $ 1,028   

US government sponsored entities and agencies

     113,183         113,416         17,826         17,910         23,031         23,597   

State, county, & municipal

     34,079         33,253         35,376         35,496         37,134         35,472   

Mortgage-backed securities

     348,990         354,258         398,482         409,780         188,219         191,983   
                                                     

Total

   $ 496,252       $ 500,927       $ 451,684       $ 463,186       $ 249,385       $ 252,080   
                                                     

Beginning in 2009, we initiated a trading securities portfolio at our lead subsidiary bank. For this portfolio, realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in trading securities revenue, a component of non interest income in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. Securities purchased for this portfolio have primarily been municipal securities and are held for short periods of time. This activity was initiated to take advantage of market opportunities, when presented, for short term revenue gains. The table below summarizes our trading activity during the years presented.

 

(dollars are in thousands)

   2010     2009  

Beginning balance

   $ —        $ —     

Purchases

     304,750        32,714   

Proceeds from sales

     (303,147     (33,141

Net realized gain on sales

     597        427   

Mark-to-market adjustment

     25        0   
                

Ending balance

   $ 2,225      $ —     
                

Loans

Lending-related income is the most important component of our net interest income and is a major contributor to profitability. The loan portfolio is the largest component of earning assets, and it therefore generates the largest portion of revenues. The absolute volume of loans and the volume of loans as a percentage

 

48


Table of Contents

of earning assets is an important determinant of net interest margin as loans are expected to produce higher yields than securities and other earning assets. Average loans during the year ended December 31, 2010, were $1,023,597,000, or 59% of average earning assets, as compared to $923,080,000, or 57% of average earning assets, for the year ending December 31, 2009. Total loans, net of unearned fees and cost, at December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $1,129,946,000 and $959,021,000, respectively, an increase of $170,925,000, or 18%. Substantially all of this net increase is a result of our three failed financial institution acquisitions during 2010. This also represents a loan to total asset ratio of 55% and 55% and a loan to deposit ratio of 67% and 73%, at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Seventeen and a half percent (17.5%) of our total loans, or $198,197,000, are covered by FDIC loss sharing agreements related to the acquisition of three failed financial institutions during the third quarter of 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC is obligated to reimburse us for 80% of losses with respect to the covered loans beginning with the first dollar of loss incurred, subject to the terms of the agreements. We will reimburse the FDIC for its share of recoveries with respect to the covered loans. The loss sharing agreements applicable to single family residential mortgage loans provide for FDIC loss sharing and our reimbursement to the FDIC for recoveries for ten years. The loss sharing agreements applicable to commercial loans provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years and our reimbursement to the FDIC for a total of eight years for recoveries.

Eighty-two and a half percent (82.5%) of our loans, or $931,749,000, are not covered by FDIC loss sharing agreements. Of this amount approximately 83% are collateralized by real estate, 11% are commercial non real estate loans and the remaining 6% are consumer and other non real estate loans. The loans collateralized by real estate are further delineated as follows.

Residential real estate loans: These are single family home loans originated within our local market areas by employee loan officers. We do not use loan brokers to originate loans for our own portfolio, nor do we acquire loans outside of our geographical markets. The size of this portfolio is $255,571,000 representing approximately 27% of our total loans, excluding those covered by FDIC loss share agreements. Within this category there are approximately $17,282,000 non performing (non accrual) loans (105 loans) as of December 31, 2010.

Commercial real estate loans: This is the largest category ($410,162,000) of our loan portfolio representing approximately 44% of our total loans, excluding those covered by FDIC loss share agreements. This category, along with commercial non real estate lending, is our primary business. There is no significant concentration by type of property in this category but there is a geographical concentration such that the properties are all located in central Florida. The borrowers are a mix of professionals, doctors, lawyers, and other small business people. Approximately 55% of these loans are owner occupied. Within this category there are approximately $28,364,000 non performing (non accrual) loans (59 loans) as of December 31, 2010.

Construction, development and land loans: We have no construction or development loans with national builders. We do business with local builders and developers that have typically been long time customers. This category represents approximately 12% ($109,380,000) of our total loan portfolio. The majority of this amount is land development, lots, and other land loans. Approximately $15,546,000 of loans in this category are non performing (non accrual) loans (57 loans) as of December 31, 2010, of which substantially all are collateralized by residential building lots, commercial building lots, undeveloped land and vacant land both residential and commercial.

Loan concentrations are considered to exist where there are amounts loaned to multiple borrowers engaged in similar activities, which collectively could be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions and when the total of such amounts would exceed 25% of total capital. Due to the lack of diversified industry and the relative proximity of markets served, we have concentrations in geographic regions as well as in types of loans funded.

 

49


Table of Contents

The tables below provide a summary of the loan portfolio composition and maturities for the periods provided below.

Loan Portfolio Composition

(Dollars are in thousands)

Types of Loans

 

at December 31:

   2010     2009     2008     2007     2006  

Loans not covered by FDIC loss share agreements

          

Real estate loans:

          

Residential

   $ 255,571      $ 251,634      $ 223,290      $ 209,186      $ 180,869   

Commercial

     410,162        438,540        434,488        385,669        291,536   

Construction, development, land

     109,380        115,937        92,475        108,615        60,950   
                                        

Total real estate loans

     775,113        806,111        750,253        703,470        533,355   

Commercial

     100,906        98,273        80,523        78,231        68,948   

Consumer and other loans

     56,458        55,376        61,939        60,687        56,684   
                                        

Total loans—gross

     932,477        959,760        892,715        842,388        658,987   

Less: unearned fees/costs

     (728     (739     (714     (983     (1,024
                                        

Total loans not covered by FDIC loss share agreements

     931,749        959,021        892,001        841,405        657,963   
                                        

Loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements

          

Real estate loans:

          

Residential

     111,472        —          —          —          —     

Commercial

     67,761        —          —          —          —     

Construction, development, land

     13,253        —          —          —          —     
                                        

Total real estate loans

     192,486        —          —          —          —     

Commercial

     5,711        —          —          —          —     
                                        

Total loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements

     198,197        —          —          —          —     
                                        

Total loans

   $ 1,129,946      $ 959,021      $ 892,001      $ 841,405      $ 657,963   
                                        

Total loans, gross (excludes unearned fees/cost)

   $ 1,130,674      $ 959,760      $ 892,715      $ 842,388      $ 658,987   
                                        

The repayment of loans is a source of additional liquidity for us. The following table sets forth the loans maturing within specific intervals at December 31, 2010.

Loan Maturity Schedule

(Dollars are in thousands)

 

     December 31, 2010  
     0 – 12
Months
     1 – 5
Years
     Over 5
Years
     Total  

All loans other than construction, development, land

   $ 219,473       $ 405,181       $ 383,387       $ 1,008,041   

Real estate—construction, development, land

     47,623         56,978         18,032         122,633   
                                   

Total

   $ 267,096       $ 462,159       $ 401,419       $ 1,130,674   
                                   

Fixed interest rate

   $ 122,984       $ 328,204       $ 128,839       $ 580,027   

Variable interest rate

     144,112         133,955         272,580         550,647   
                                   

Total

   $ 267,096       $ 462,159       $ 401,419       $ 1,130,674   
                                   

 

50


Table of Contents

The information presented in the above table is based upon the contractual maturities of the individual loans, including loans which may be subject to renewal at their contractual maturity. Renewal of such loans is subject to review and credit approval, as well as modification of terms upon their maturity. Consequently, management believes this treatment presents fairly the maturity structure of the loan portfolio. See “Liquidity and Market Risk Management” for a discussion regarding the repricing structure of the loan portfolio.

Credit Quality and Allowance for Loan Losses

We maintain an allowance for loan losses that we believe is adequate to absorb probable incurred losses inherent in our loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses, which is a charge to current period earnings and decreased by loan charge-offs net of recoveries of prior period loan charge-offs. Loans are charged against the allowance when management believes collection of the principal is unlikely.

The allowance consists of two components. The first component consists of amounts reserved for impaired loans, as defined by ASC 310. Impaired loans are those loans that management has estimated will not repay as agreed pursuant to the loan contract. Each of these loans is required to have a written analysis supporting the amount of specific reserve allocated to the particular loan, if any. That is to say, a loan may be impaired (i.e. not expected to repay as agreed), but may be sufficiently collateralized such that we expect to recover all principle and interest eventually, and therefore no specific reserve is warranted.

The second component is a general reserve on all of our loans other than those identified as impaired and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio segment and is based on the actual loss history experienced over the most recent two years. This actual loss experience is supplemented with other economic factors based on the risks present for each portfolio segment. The following portfolio segments have been identified:

Residential real estate loans

First mortgage residential real estate

Second mortgage residential real estate

Home equity lines of credit

Commercial real estate loans

Apartment loans

Commercial real estate other than multifamily apartment loans

Construction, development, land loans

Commercial loans not collateralized by real estate

Consumer and other loans not collateralized by real estate

The historical loss factors for each portfolio segment is adjusted for current internal and external environmental factors, as well as for certain loan grading factors. The environmental factors that we consider are listed below.

We consider changes in the levels of and trends in past due loans, non-accrual loans and impaired loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans. Also, we consider changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans.

We consider levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries.

We consider changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and in the terms of loans.

We consider changes in lending policies, procedures and practices, including changes in underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices not considered elsewhere in estimating credit losses. We also consider changes in the quality of our loan review system.

We consider changes in the experience, ability, and depth of our lending management and other relevant staff.

 

51


Table of Contents

We consider changes in international, national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and developments that affect the collectibility of the portfolio, including the condition of various market segments (national and local economic trends and conditions).

We consider the effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in our existing portfolio (industry conditions).

We consider the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations.

In the table below we have shown the two components, as discussed above, of our allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2010 and 2009. The data in the table below excludes loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements.

 

     December 31,     increase
(decrease)
 

(amounts are in thousands of dollars)

   2010     2009    

Impaired loans

   $ 86,977      $ 78,948      $ 8,029   

Component 1 (specific allowance)

     3,194        4,612        (1,418

Specific allowance as percentage of impaired loans

     3.67     5.84     (217)bps   

Total loans other than impaired loans

     844,772        880,073        (35,301

Component 2 (general allowance)

     23,073        18,677        4,396   

General allowance as percentage of non impaired loans

     2.73     2.12     61bps   

Total loans

     931,749        959,021        (27,272

Total allowance for loan losses

     26,267        23,289        2,978   

Allowance for loan losses as percentage of total loans

     2.82     2.43     39bps   

During 2010, we observed increasing trends in our loan delinquencies and non-accrual loans. We also observed continued degradation of real estate values nationally in general, and within Florida specifically. We believe the changes in these trends differ significantly enough from historical trends such that we have increased our general allowance risk factors.

As shown in the table above, our allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”) as a percentage of total loans outstanding was 2.82% at December 31, 2010 and 2.43% at December 31, 2009. Our ALLL had a net increase of $2,978,000 during this twelve month period. Of this amount, $4,396,000 relates to an increase in our Component 2, or general allowance, which is due to changes in this component’s risk factors, as discussed above. Our specific allowance, Component 1, is the aggregate of the results of individual analyses prepared for each one of our impaired loans, excluding loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements, on a loan by loan basis. This Component decreased by $1,418,000 during the same period. The primary reason the specific allowance decreased was due to partial charge-offs. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Net charge-offs during 2010 were $26,646,000 compared to $13,942,000 in 2009. Approximately $9,746,000 of commercial loan charge-offs during the year is related to the troubled loans which were disposed of in the wholesale debt market. The Company sold troubled commercial loans with an aggregate unpaid legal balance of approximately $18,807,000 for an amount equal to about 46% of the unpaid legal balance. The Company had been receiving about 55% to 65% on average of the unpaid legal balance when a troubled loan is eventually foreclosed and the asset is repossessed and eventually sold. We are committed to the early recognition of problems and to maintaining a sufficient allowance. We believe our allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2010 was adequate.

 

52


Table of Contents

The table below sets forth the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods presented.

Activity in Allowance for Loan Losses

(Dollars are in thousands)

 

     2010     2009     2008     2007     2006  

Balance, beginning of year

   $ 23,289      $ 13,335      $ 10,828      $ 7,355      $ 6,491   

Loans charged-off:

          

Commercial

     (774     (830     (856     (206     (368

Real estate mortgage

     (25,792     (12,900     (2,697     (386     (131

Consumer

     (523     (353     (636     (405     (99
                                        

Total loans charged-off

     (27,089     (14,083     (4,189     (997     (598

Recoveries on loans previously charged-off:

          

Commercial

     11        29        14        1        53   

Real estate mortgage

     387        65        95        16        9   

Consumer

     45        47        67        44        36   
                                        

Total loan recoveries

     443        141        176        61        98   

Net loans charged-off

     (26,646     (13,942     (4,013     (936     (500

Provision for loan losses charged to expense

     29,624        23,896        6,520        2,792        717   

Acquisition of Mid FL

     —          —          —          —          647   

Acquisition of VSB

     —          —          —          1,617        —     
                                        

Balance, end of year

   $ 26,267      $ 23,289      $ 13,335      $ 10,828      $ 7,355   
                                        

Total loans at year end (Note 1)

   $ 931,749      $ 959,021      $ 892,001      $ 841,405      $ 657,963   

Average loans outstanding (Note 1)

   $ 940,198      $ 923,080      $ 856,260      $ 791,886      $ 605,236   

Allowance for loan losses to total loans at year end

     2.82     2.43     1.49     1.29     1.12

Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding

     2.83     1.51     0.47     0.12     0.08

Note 1: Excludes loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements.

Non performing loans consist of non accrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest, excluding loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements. Non performing assets consist of non-performing loans plus (a) OREO (i.e. real estate acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure); (b) other repossessed assets that is not real estate; and (c) are not covered by FDIC loss share agreements. We place loans on non accrual status when they are past due 90 days and management believes the borrower’s financial condition, after giving consideration to economic conditions and collection efforts, is such that collection of interest is doubtful. When we place a loan on non-accrual status, interest accruals cease and uncollected interest is reversed and charged against current income. Subsequent collections reduce the principal balance of the loan until the loan is returned to accrual status or interest is recognized only to extent received in cash.

 

53


Table of Contents

The largest component of non performing loans is non accrual loans, which as of December 31, 2010 totaled $62,553,000 (268 loans), excluding loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements. This amount is further delineated by loan category as follows:

 

Non accrual loans at 12/31/10 (in thousands of dollars)

   Aggregate
loan
amounts
     % of
non accrual
by category
    Number
of loans
 

Residential real estate

   $ 17,282         28     105   

Commercial real estate

     28,364         45     59   

Construction, development, land

     15,546         25     57   

Commercial

     615         1     17   

Consumer and other

     746         1     30   
                         

Total

   $ 62,553         100     268   

The other component of non performing loans are loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing interest. Loans past due greater than 90 days are placed on non accrual status unless they are both well secured and in the process of collection.

At December 31, 2010, total OREO was $23,343,000. Of this amount, $11,104,000 was acquired pursuant to the acquisition of three failed financial institutions during the third quarter of 2010. The acquired OREO is covered by FDIC loss sharing agreements. Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC is obligated to reimburse the Company for 80% of losses with respect to the covered OREO beginning with the first dollar of loss incurred, subject to the terms of the agreements. The Company will reimburse the FDIC for its share of recoveries with respect to the covered OREO. The loss sharing agreements applicable to single family residential mortgage loans provide for FDIC loss sharing and our reimbursement to the FDIC for recoveries for ten years. The loss sharing agreements applicable to commercial loans provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years and our reimbursement to the FDIC for a total of eight years for recoveries.

OREO not covered by FDIC loss share agreements is $12,239,000 at December 31, 2010, and is included in our non performing assets (“NPA”). OREO is carried at the lower of cost or market less the estimated cost to sell. Further declines in real estate values can affect the market value of these assets. Any further decline in market value beyond its cost basis is recorded as a current expense in our Statement of Operations. The current carrying value represents approximately 62% of the unpaid legal balance of the related loan when the asset was repossessed. OREO is further delineated in the table below (in thousands of dollars).

 

(unaudited)

Description of repossessed real estate (OREO)

   carrying amount
at Dec 31, 2010
 

15 single family homes

   $ 2,271   

4 mobile homes with land

     101   

45 residential building lots

     889   

16 commercial buildings

     6,851   

Land/various acreages

     2,127   
        

Total, excluding OREO covered by FDIC loss share agreements

   $ 12,239   

At December 31, 2010 we had repossessed assets other than real estate with an aggregate estimated fair value of approximately $532,000. This amount included equipment with an aggregate estimated fair value of $225,000 and sixteen mobile homes with an aggregate estimated fair value of $307,000.

Interest income not recognized on non-accrual loans was approximately $1,087,000, $974,000 and $490,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

54


Table of Contents

The table below summarizes non performing loans and assets for the periods provided. The increases in non performing loans and non performing assets are a reflection of the real estate market in Florida and the overall economy in general.

Non Performing Loans and Non Performing Assets

(Dollars are in thousands)

 

     December 31,  
     2010     2009     2008     2007     2006  

Non accrual loans (Note 1)

   $ 62,553      $ 42,059      $ 19,863      $ 3,797      $ 448   

Past due loans 90 days or more and still accruing interest (Note 1)

     3,200        282        50        277        162   
                                        

Total non performing loans (Note 1)

     65,753        42,341        19,913        4,074        610   

Repossessed real estate (“OREO”) (Note 1)

     12,239        10,196        4,494        583     

Repossessed assets other than real estate (Note 1)

     532        915        428        170        35   
                                        

Total non performing assets (Note 1)

   $ 78,524      $ 53,452      $ 24,835      $ 4,827      $ 645   
                                        

Total non performing loans as a percentage of total loans (Note 1)

     7.06     4.42     2.23     0.48     0.09
                                        

Total non performing assets as a percentage of total assets (Note 1)

     3.81     3.05     1.86     0.40     0.06
                                        

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non performing loans (Note 1)

     40     55     67     266     1,206
                                        

Note 1: Excludes loans, OREO and other repossessed assets covered by FDIC loss share agreements.

Management considers a loan to be impaired when it is probable that we will not be repaid as agreed pursuant to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Once the loan has been identified as impaired, a written analysis is performed to determine if there is a potential for a loss. If it is probable that a loss may occur, a specific reserve, or a partial charge down, for that particular loan is then recognized. The loan is then placed on non accrual status and included in non performing loans. If the analysis indicates that a loss is not probable, then no specific reserve, or partial charge down, is recognized. If the loan is still accruing, it is not included in non performing loans.

Loans that are monitored for impairment pursuant to ASC 310 generally include commercial, commercial real estate, land, acquisition & development of land, and construction loans greater than $500,000. Smaller homogeneous loans, such as single family first and second mortgages, consumer loans, and small business and commercial related loans are not generally subject to impairment monitoring pursuant to ASC 310, but are analyzed for potential losses based on historical loss factors, current environmental factors and to some extent loan grading.

Interest income recognized on impaired loans was approximately $2,330,000, $1,731,000 and $867,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The average recorded investment in impaired loans during 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $82,695,000, $42,962,000 and $19,526,000, respectively.

In this current real estate crisis that the Nation in general and Florida in particular has been experiencing, it has become more common to restructure or modify the terms of certain loans under certain conditions. In certain circumstances it may be more beneficial to restructure the terms of a loan and work with the borrower for the benefit of both parties, versus forcing the property into foreclosure and having to dispose of it in an unfavorable and depressed real estate market. When we have modified the terms of a loan, we usually reduce the monthly

 

55


Table of Contents

payment for generally about twelve months. We have approximately $22,322,000 of troubled debt restructures (“TDRs”). Of this amount $10,591,000 are performing pursuant to their modified terms, and $11,731,000 are not performing and have been placed on non accrual status and included in our non performing loans (“NPLs”).

Current accounting standards require TDRs to be included in our impaired loans, whether they are performing or not performing. Only non performing TDRs are included in our NPLs. The table below summarizes our impaired loans and TDRs for the periods provided.

Impaired Loans and Troubled Debt Restructure (“TDRs”)

(Dollars are in thousands)

 

     December 31,  
     2010      2009      2008      2007      2006  

Performing TDRs

   $ 10,591       $ 14,517       $ —         $ —         $ —     

Non performing TDRs

     11,731         11,982         —           —           —     
                                            

Total TDRs

   $ 22,322       $ 26,499       $ —         $ —         $ —     
                                            

Impaired loans that are not TDRs

   $ 64,655       $ 52,449       $ 24,191       $ 11,803       $ 4,986   

Impaired loans that are TDRs

     22,322         26,499         —           —           —     
                                            

Recorded investment in impaired loans

   $ 86,977       $ 78,948       $ 24,191       $ 11,803       $ 4,986   
                                            

Allowance for loan losses related to impaired loans

   $ 3,194       $ 4,612       $ 1,799       $ 812       $ 372   
                                            

TDRs as of December 31, 2010 quantified by loan type classified separately as accrual (performing loans) and non-accrual (non performing loans) are presented in the table below. Amounts are in thousands of dollars.

 

TDRs

   Accruing      Non
Accrual
     Total  

Real estate loans:

        

Residential

   $ 6,222       $ 5,322       $ 11,544   

Commercial

     2,273         5,857         8,130   

Construction, development, land

     918         464         1,382   
                          

Total real estate loans

     9,413         11,643         21,056   

Commercial

     582         —           582   

Consumer and other

     596         88         684   
                          

Total TDRs

   $ 10,591       $ 11,731       $ 22,322   
                          

Our policy is to return non accrual TDR loans to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due, pursuant to its modified terms, are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. Our policy also considers the payment history of the borrower, but is not dependent upon a specific number of payments.

 

56


Table of Contents

Loans are modified to minimize loan losses when we believe the modification will improve the borrower’s financial condition and ability to repay the loan. Generally we do not forgive principal, however, we forgave $25,000 of principal on one of our TDR loans in 2009. We generally either reduce interest rates or decrease monthly payments for a temporary period of time and those reductions of cash flows are capitalized into the loan balance. A summary of the types of concessions made are presented in the table below. Amounts are in thousands of dollars.

 

     Dec 31, 2010      Dec 31, 2009  

3 months interest only

   $ 282       $ 87   

6 months interest only

     2,553         3,396   

7 months interest only

     236         —     

9 months interest only

     382         —     

12 months interest only

     11,073         15,276   

18 months interest only

     191         191   

payment reduction for 12 months

     4,947         5,319   

all other

     2,658         2,230   
                 

Total TDRs

   $ 22,322         26,499   
                 

It is still early in our experience with these types of activities, but approximately 47% of our TDRs are current pursuant to their modified terms. On the other hand, $11,731,000, or approximately 53% of our total TDRs are not performing pursuant to their modified terms. Long-term success with our performing TDRs is an unknown, and will depend to a great extent on the future of our economy and our local real estate markets. Thus far, there does not appear to be any significant difference in success rates with one type of concession versus another. Non performing TDRs average approximately seventeen months in age from their modification date through December 31, 2010. Performing TDRs average approximately eleven months in age from their modification date through December 31, 2010.

We are continually analyzing our loan portfolio in an effort to recognize and resolve our problem assets as quickly and efficiently as possible. While we believe we use the best information available at the time to make a determination with respect to the allowance for loan losses, we recognize that many factors can adversely impact various segments of our markets, and subsequent adjustments in the allowance may be necessary if future economic indications or other factors differ from the assumptions used in making the initial determination or if regulatory policies change. We continuously focus our attention on promptly identifying and providing for potential problem loans, as they arise. The table below summarizes our loans past due greater than 30 days and less than 90 days for the periods presented, excluding loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements. Dollars are in thousands.

 

     December 31  
     2010     2009     2008     2007     2006  

past due loans 30-89 days

   $ 18,249      $ 12,237      $ 19,346      $ 9,399      $ 2,821   

as percentage of total loans

     1.96     1.28     2.17     1.12     0.43

Although the total allowance for loan losses is available to absorb losses from all loans, management allocates the reserve among loan portfolio categories for informational and regulatory reporting purposes. Regulatory examiners may require us to recognize additions to the allowance based upon the regulators’ judgments about the information available to them at the time of their examination, which may differ from our judgments about the allowance for loan losses.

While no portion of the allowance is in any way restricted to any individual loan or group of loans, and the entire allowance is available to absorb losses from any and all loans, the following table summarizes our

 

57


Table of Contents

allocation of allowance for loan losses by loan category and loans in each category as a percentage of total loans, for the periods presented, excluding loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements. Dollar amounts are in thousands.

 

     December 31,  
     2010     2009     2008  

Real estate loans:

               

Residential

   $ 7,704         27   $ 5,827         26   $ 2,390         25

Commercial

     8,587         44     9,378         46     6,268         49

Construction, development, land

     6,893         12     4,882         12     2,058         10
                                                   

Total real estate loans

     23,184         83     20,087         84     10,716         84

Commercial loans

     2,182         11     2,023         10     1,726         9

Consumer and other loans

     896         6     1,169         6     892         7

Unallocated

     5           10           1      
                                                   

Total

   $ 26,267         100   $ 23,289         100   $ 13,335         100
                                                   

 

     December 31,  
     2007     2006  

Real estate loans:

          

Residential

   $ 1,441         25   $ 998         28

Commercial

     5,202         46     2,969         44

Construction, development, land

     1,636         13     1,213         9
                                  

Total real estate loans

     8,279         84     5,180         81

Commercial loans

     1,413         9     1,271         10

Consumer and other loans

     929         7     904         9

Unallocated

     207           —        
                                  

Total

   $ 10,828         100   $ 7,355         100
                                  

Bank Premises and Equipment

Bank premises and equipment was $84,982,000 at December 31, 2010 compared to $62,368,000 at December 31, 2009, an increase of $22,614,000 or 36%. The increase is the result of purchases and construction costs totaling approximately $24,121,000 plus land previously held for sale transferred back to inventory for future branch sites of $1,868,000, less $25,000 loss on disposition of fixed asset and less $3,350,000 of depreciation expense.

At December 31, 2010, we operated from 49 banking locations in thirteen central Florida Counties. In January 2011, we acquired four additional branch sites located in Putnam County, FL. We currently lease 12 of the 53 banking locations and own 41. In addition to our banking locations, we lease non banking office space in Birmingham, Alabama and in Atlanta, Georgia. Both are used by our correspondent banking division.

During 2010, we purchased and/or incurred construction costs for a total of twelve buildings costing approximately $15,238,000, including land. We also capitalized software development cost of approximately $2,269,000 related to our correspondent banking division, and purchased core data processing software for our commercial banking segment of approximately $2,380,000. Our leasehold improvement and land improvement expenses were approximately $747,000. We also purchased computer equipment, furniture and equipment of approximately $3,487,000, excluding the core processing software purchase.

 

58


Table of Contents

Deposits

Total deposits increased $380,558,000, or 29%, to $1,685,594,000 as of December 31, 2010, compared to $1,305,036,000 at December 31, 2009. Average deposit balances for the year 2010 compared to 2009 increased by 21%. The growth in deposits was due to our three FDIC acquisitions during the third quarter of 2010, checking accounts from our correspondent bank customers and internally generated growth. We believe the value of our franchise is our core deposit customers and as such this is where we focus our marketing efforts. We initiated and/or continued various incentive programs as well as other marketing efforts focusing on core deposit (defined as non time deposit accounts) growth. Between December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, our core deposits increased by $293,053,000, or 40%. Average core deposit balances for the year 2010 compared to 2009 increased by 38%. The tables below summarize selected deposit information for the periods indicated.

 

     December 31,  

(Dollars are in thousands)

   2010     2009     2008  

Non time deposits

   $ 1,027,781         61.0   $ 734,728         56.3   $ 507,106         51.0

Time deposits

     657,813         39.0     570,308         43.7     486,694         49.0
                                                   

Total deposits

   $ 1,685,594         100   $ 1,305,036         100   $ 993,800         100
                                                   

Average deposit balance by type and average interest rates

(Dollars are in thousands)

 

     2010     2009     2008  
     Average
Balance
     Average
Rate
    Average
Balance
     Average
Rate
    Average
Balance
     Average
Rate
 

Non interest bearing demand deposits

   $ 302,867         —     $ 206,733         —     $ 152,231         —  

NOW accounts

     217,083         0.40     167,269         0.51     141,756         0.67

Money market accounts

     190,778         0.78     152,005         1.29     112,957         2.03

Savings accounts

     177,632         0.66     119,768         1.00     67,215         1.09

Time deposits

     628,942         1.94     608,394         2.71     501,193         4.18
                                                   

Total

   $ 1,517,302         1.04   $ 1,254,169         1.63   $ 975,352         2.56
                                                   

Maturity of time deposits of $100,000 or more

(Dollars are in thousands)

 

     December 31,  
     2010      2009      2008  

Three months or less

   $ 86,748       $ 56,011       $ 80,726   

Three through six months

     71,282         55,149         64,081   

Six through twelve months

     74,841         93,880         79,867   

Over twelve months

     158,198         107,190         44,814   
                          

Total

   $ 391,069       $ 312,230       $ 269,488   
                          

Repurchase Agreements

We enter into borrowing arrangements with retail business customers by agreements to repurchase (“repurchase agreements”) under which we pledge investment securities owned and under our control as collateral against the one-day borrowing arrangement. These arrangements are not transactions with investment bankers or brokerage firms, but rather, with several of our larger commercial customers who periodically have excess cash balances and do not want to keep those balances in non interest bearing checking accounts. Because

 

59


Table of Contents

our banks are not permitted to pay interest on commercial checking accounts, we offer an arrangement through a repurchase agreement whereby balances are transferred from their checking account into a repurchase agreement arrangement which we will pay a daily adjustable interest rate of the federal fund rate minus an amount that traditional ranged between 0.35% and 0.75%, but currently is a much smaller due to the low interest rate environment during 2010.

The daily average balance of these short-term borrowing agreements for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, was approximately $21,254,000, $24,276,000 and $30,818,000, respectively. Interest expense for the same periods was approximately $89,000, $100,000 and $459,000, respectively, resulting in an average rate paid of 0.42%, 0.41% and 1.49% for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. The table below summarizes our repurchase agreements for the periods presented.

Schedule of short-term borrowing (1)

(Dollars are in thousands)

 

     Maximum
outstanding
at any
month end
     Average
balance
     Average
interest rate
during the
year
    Ending
Balance
     Weighted
Average
interest rate
at year end
 

Year ended December 31,

             

2010

   $ 25,367       $ 21,254         0.42   $ 13,789         0.50

2009

     29,562         24,276         0.41   $ 29,562         0.40

2008

     36,825         30,818         1.49   $ 26,457         0.19

 

(1) Consist of securities sold under agreements to repurchase

Other borrowed funds

From time to time we borrow on a short-term basis, usually overnight, either through Federal Home Loan Bank advances or Federal Funds Purchased. Included in Federal Funds Purchased are overnight deposits from correspondent banks. We began accepting correspondent bank deposits (classified as Federal Funds Purchased) during September 2008 pursuant to the initiation of our new correspondent banking division. At December 31, 2010 we had $68,495,000 overnight Federal Funds Purchased correspondent bank deposits. During the year, these deposits had a daily average balance of approximately $105,344,000. These accounts are included with other Federal Funds Purchased and Federal Home Loan Bank advances in the table below, which summarizes our other borrowings for the periods presented. For additional information refer to Notes 12 and 13 in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Schedule of short-term borrowing (1)

(Dollars are in thousands)

 

     Maximum
outstanding
at any
month end
     Average
balance
     Average
interest rate
during the
year
    Ending
Balance
     Weighted
Average
interest rate
at year end
 

Year ended December 31,

             

2010

   $ 157,037       $ 121,228         0.42   $ 83,495         0.52

2009

   $ 343,370       $ 261,839         0.46   $ 165,939         0.36

2008

     114,726         57,152         2.77   $ 114,726         0.84

 

(1) Consist of Federal Home Loan Bank advances and Federal Funds Purchased

Corporate debenture

We formed CenterState Banks of Florida Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”) for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. On September 22, 2003, we issued a floating rate corporate debenture in the amount of

 

60


Table of Contents

$10,000,000. The Trust used the proceeds from the issuance of a trust preferred security to acquire the corporate debenture of the Company. The trust preferred security essentially mirrors the corporate debenture, carrying a cumulative preferred dividend at a variable rate equal to the interest rate on the corporate debenture (three month LIBOR plus 305 basis points). The rate is subject to change quarterly. The rate in effect during the quarter ended December 31, 2010 was 3.34%. The corporate debenture and the trust preferred security each have 30-year lives. The trust preferred security and the corporate debenture are callable by the Company or the Trust, at their respective option after five years, and sooner in specific events, subject to prior approval by the Federal Reserve Board, if then required. The Company has treated the trust preferred security as Tier 1 capital up to the maximum amount allowed under the Federal Reserve guidelines for federal regulatory purposes.

In September 2004, Valrico Bancorp Inc. (“VBI”) formed Valrico Capital Statutory Trust (“Valrico Trust”) for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. On September 9, 2004, VBI issued a floating rate corporate debenture in the amount of $2,500,000. The Trust used the proceeds from the issuance of a trust preferred security to acquire the corporate debenture. The trust preferred security essentially mirrors the corporate debenture, carrying a cumulative preferred dividend at a variable rate equal to the interest rate on the corporate debenture (three month LIBOR plus 270 basis points). The rate is subject to change quarterly. The rate in effect during the quarter that included December 31, 2010 was 3.00%. The corporate debenture and the trust preferred security each have 30-year lives. The trust preferred security and the corporate debenture are callable by VBI or the Valrico Trust, at their respective option after five years, and sooner in specific events, subject to prior approval by the Federal Reserve, if then required. On April 2, 2007, the Company acquired all the assets and assumed all the liabilities of VBI pursuant to the merger agreement, including VBI’s corporate debenture and related trust preferred security discussed above. The Company has treated the trust preferred security as Tier 1 capital up to the maximum amount allowed under the Federal Reserve guidelines for federal regulatory purposes.

Liquidity and Market Risk Management

Market and public confidence in our financial strength and financial institutions in general will largely determine our access to appropriate levels of liquidity. This confidence is significantly dependent on our ability to maintain sound asset quality and appropriate levels of capital reserves.

Liquidity is defined as the ability to meet anticipated customer demands for funds under credit commitments and deposit withdrawals at a reasonable cost and on a timely basis. We measure our liquidity position by giving consideration to both on- and off-balance sheet sources of and demands for funds on a daily and weekly basis.

Liquidity risk involves the risk of being unable to fund assets with the appropriate duration and rate-based liabilities, as well as the risk of not being able to meet unexpected cash needs. Liquidity planning and management are necessary to ensure the ability to fund operations cost-effectively and to meet current and future potential obligations such as loan commitments, lease obligations, and unexpected deposit outflows. In this process, we focus on both assets and liabilities and on the manner in which they combine to provide adequate liquidity to meet our needs.

Interest rate sensitivity refers to the responsiveness of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities to changes in market interest rates. The rate sensitive position, or gap, is the difference in the volume of rate-sensitive assets and liabilities, at a given time interval, including both floating rate instruments and instruments which are approaching maturity. The measurement of our interest rate sensitivity, or gap, is one of the principal techniques we use in our asset/liability management effort. Each of our banks generally attempts to maintain a range set by policy between rate-sensitive assets and liabilities by repricing periods. The range set by the banks has been approved by their board of directors. If any of our banks fall outside their pre-approved range, it requires board action and board approval, by that particular bank’s board of directors. The asset mix of our balance sheet is evaluated continually in terms of several variables: yield, credit quality, and appropriate funding sources and liquidity. Management of the liability mix of the balance sheet focuses on expanding the various funding sources.

 

61


Table of Contents

Our gap and liquidity positions are reviewed periodically to determine whether or not changes in policies and procedures are necessary to achieve financial goals. At December 31, 2010, approximately 49% of total gross loans were adjustable rate. Approximately 71% of our investment securities ($354,258,000 fair value) are invested in U.S. Government Agency mortgage backed securities. Although most of these have maturities in excess of five years, these are amortizing instruments that generate cash flows each month. The duration (average life of expected cash flows) of our securities at December 31, 2010 was approximately 2.9 years. Deposit liabilities, at that date, consisted of approximately $282,405,000 (17%) in NOW accounts, $422,152,000 (25%) in money market accounts and savings, $657,813,000 (39%) in time deposits and $323,224,000 (19%) in non-interest bearing demand accounts.

The table below presents the market risk associated with our financial instruments. In the “Rate Sensitivity Analysis” table, rate sensitive assets and liabilities are shown by repricing periods. The estimated fair value of each instrument category is also shown in the table. While these estimates of fair value are based on our judgment of the most appropriate factors, there is no assurance that, if we had to dispose of such instruments at December 31, 2010, the estimated fair values would necessarily have been achieved at that date, since market values may differ depending on various circumstances. The estimated fair values at December 31, 2010, should not necessarily be considered to apply at subsequent dates.

RATE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

December 31, 2010

 

(Dollars are in thousands)

  0 - 1Yr     1 - 2Yrs     2 - 3Yrs     3 - 4Yrs     4 - 5Yrs     5Yrs +     Total  

Interest earning assets

             

Fixed rate loans (1)

  $ 122,984      $ 76,195      $ 115,105      $ 71,074      $ 65,830      $ 128,839      $ 580,027   

Variable rate loans (1)

    423,141        31,113        29,004        30,125        27,545        9,719        550,647   

Investment securities (2)

    30,827        11,440        1,391        626        13,650        438,318        496,252   

Federal funds sold and other (3)

    154,264        —          —          —          —          —          154,264   

Other earning assets (4)

    10,122        —          —          —          —          —          10,122   
                                                       

Total interest earning assets

  $ 741,338      $ 118,748      $ 145,500      $ 101,825      $ 107,025      $ 576,876      $ 1,791,312   
                                                       

Interest bearing liabilities

             

NOW accounts

  $ 282,405      $ —        $ —        $ —        $ —        $ —        $ 282,405   

Money market accounts

    223,724        —          —          —          —          —          223,724   

Savings accounts

    198,428        —          —          —          —          —          198,428   

Time deposits (5)

    403,228        128,932        27,847        27,653        69,175        978        657,813   

Repurchase agreements (6)

    13,789        —          —          —          —          —          13,789   

Federal funds purchased

    68,495        —          —          —          —          —          68,495   

FHLB advances

    15,000        —          —          —          —          —          15,000   

Corporate debentures

    12,500        —          —          —          —          —          12,500   
                                                       

Total interest bearing liabilities

  $ 1,217,569      $ 128,932      $ 27,847      $ 27,653      $ 69,175      $ 978      $ 1,472,154   
                                                       

Interest sensitivity gap

    (476,231     (10,184     117,653        74,172        37,850        575,898     

Cumulative gap

    (476,231     (486,415     (368,762     (294,590     (256,740     319,158     

Cumulative gap RSA/RSL (7)

    0.61        0.64        0.73        0.79        0.83        1.22     

 

(1) Loans are shown at gross values and do not include $728 of net deferred origination fees and costs. Estimated fair value of fixed loans and variable rate loans combined at December 31, 2010 is approximately $1,137,111.
(2) Securities are shown at amortized cost. Includes $348,990 (amortized cost basis) of mortgage backed securities of which the majority are fixed rate. Although most have maturities greater than five years, these are amortizing instruments which generate cash flows on a monthly basis. Estimated fair value of securities at December 31, 2010 is approximately $500,927.

 

62


Table of Contents
(3) Includes Federal Funds sold and interest bearing deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank.
(4) Includes Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Federal Reserve Bank Stock.
(5) Time deposits are shown at carrying value. Estimated fair value at December 31, 2010 is approximately $667,632.
(6) Includes securities sold under agreements to repurchase. These are short-term borrowings, generally overnight, from our retail business customers.
(7) Rate sensitive assets (RSA) divided by rate sensitive liabilities (RSL), cumulative basis.

As stated earlier, the rate sensitivity table above summarizes our interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities by repricing periods at a point in time. It does not include assumptions about sensitivity to changes in various interest rates by asset or liability type, correlation between macro environment market rates and specific product types, lag periods, cash flows or other assumptions and projections. However, in addition to static gap analysis, our banks also use simulation models to estimate the sensitivity of their net interest income to changes in interest rates. Simulation is a better technique than gap analysis because variables are changed for the various rate conditions. Each category’s interest change is calculated as rates ramp up and down. In addition, the repayment speeds and repricing speeds are changed. Rate Shock is a method for stress testing the net interest margin over the next four quarters under several rate change levels. These levels span in 100bps increments up and down from the current interest rates. In order to simulate activity, maturing balances are replaced with the new balances at the new rate level, and repricing balances are adjusted to the new rate shock level. The interest is recalculated for each level along with the new average yield. Net interest margin is then calculated and a margin risk profile is developed. The results of these calculations, as of December 31, 2010 looking four quarters into the future, for our combined banks, are summarized in the table below.

 

change in interest rates

  -300 bps   -200 bps   -100 bps   0 bps   +100 bps   +200 bps   +300 bps

resulting effect on net

    interest income (a)

  -20.04%   -13.92%   -6.57%   current   +1.68%   +4.42%   +7.65%

 

(a) The percentage change in each of these boxes represents a percentage change from the net interest income (dollars) that the models projected for the next four quarters. To put this in perspective, as an example, our net interest income for 2010 was $57,838,000. Assuming a 100bps decrease in rates, our model is suggesting that our net interest income would decrease by 6.57%, or approximately $3,800,000. Likewise, assuming a 100bps increase in rates, our model is suggesting that our net interest income would increase by 1.68%, or approximately $972,000. It is important to reiterate again, that these models are built on a multitude of assumptions and predictions. This is not an exact science. The benefit that we see is measuring our overall interest rate risk profile. Although we are by no means suggesting the exactness of the numbers above, what we see as a take away is that in general, it appears that if market interest rates increase, it would suggest a benefit to our net interest income. If market interest rates decrease, it would suggest a negative effect on our net interest income. We believe that our interest rate risk is manageable and under control as of December 31, 2010.

Simulation and rate shock stress testing our net interest income (“NIM”) is a forward looking analysis. That is, it estimates, based on various assumptions, what the effect on our NIM might be given various changes in future interest rates. Another way of analyzing our interest rate risk profile is looking at history. The table below measures the correlation between our NIM and market interest rates over a ten year period starting at the beginning of 2000 and ending on December 31, 2010. We used the Prime lending rate as a surrogate for market interest rates. This simple correlation is not perfect because we ignore changes in duration of our asset/liability portfolio over time and changes in the slope of the yield curve over time, as well as other significant environmental changes that may occur, such as the banking crisis of 2008 and 2009. However, it will demonstrate that over time our asset/liability portfolio generally tended to be asset sensitive. That is, in general, over this historical period, when market interest rates increased, our NIM increased, and when market interest rates decreased, our NIM decreased. In the table below, the Prime rate is measured by the vertical bars, and their scale is on the left hand side of the graph. Each bar represents a month. Our NIM is represented by the line graph and its scale is on the right hand side of the graph. The line graph is connecting a series of dots, which represents our NIM for a given quarter.

 

63


Table of Contents

Net Interest Margin vs. Prime

LOGO

Managing interest rate risk is a dynamic process. Our philosophy is to not try to guess the market in either direction. We do not want to be excessively assets sensitive or excessively liability sensitive. We try to manage our asset/liability portfolio with the goal of optimizing our yield without taking on excessive interest rate risk.

Contractual Obligations

While our liquidity monitoring and management considers both present and future demands for and sources of liquidity, the following table of contractual commitments focuses only on our future obligations. In the table, all deposits with indeterminate maturities, such as demand deposits, checking accounts, savings accounts and money market accounts, are presented as having a maturity of one year or less.

 

     December 31, 2010  

(in thousands of dollars)

   Total      Due in
one year
or less
     Due over
one year
and less
than
three years
     Due over
three years
and less
than
five years
     Due over
five Years
 

Contractual commitments:

              

Deposit maturities

   $ 1,685,594       $ 1,431,009       $ 156,779       $ 96,828       $ 978   

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

     13,789         13,789         —           —           —     

Corporate debenture

     12,500         —           —           —           12,500   

Other borrowed funds

     83,495         83,495         —           —           —     

Deferred compensation

     17,730         2,590         787         914         13,439   

Operating lease obligations

     5,633         1,137         2,250         2,246         —     
                                            

Total

   $ 1,818,741       $ 1,532,020       $ 159,816       $ 99,988       $ 26,917   
                                            

Primary Sources and Uses of Funds

Our primary sources of funds during the year ended December 31, 2010 included $235,545,000 from the sale of securities, $213,692,000 from security calls and maturities, $127,599,000 from mortgage backed security

 

64


Table of Contents

pay downs, $55,368,000 net cash received from our three FDIC acquisitions, $37,208,000 net increase in deposits, $32,872,000 net proceeds for our public stock offering, $3,324,000 net decrease in loans, proceeds of $8,579,000 from our loan sale in the wholesale debt market, proceeds of $7,370,000 from the sale of OREO, $21,721,000 provided by operations, net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $14,892,000 and $735,000 from exercise of stock options.

Our primary uses of funds during 2010 included $609,710,000 purchases of securities, $11,000,000 purchase of bank owned life insurance, $24,121,000 purchases and construction cost of bank premises and purchases of furniture, fixtures and equipment, repayment of repurchase agreements, federal funds purchased and other borrowings of $112,958,000 and dividend payments of $1,116,000.

Capital Resources

Total stockholders’ equity at December 31, 2010 was $252,644,000, or 12.2% of total assets compared to $229,410,000, or 13.1% of total assets at December 31, 2009. The $23,234,000 increase was the result of the following items: issuance of common stock in a public stock offering ($32,872,000), plus exercise of stock options ($735,000), plus stock based compensation expense ($425,000), plus stock grants issued ($10,000), less net change in unrealized gains in securities available for sale ($4,149,000), less net loss ($5,543,000) and less dividends paid ($1,116,000).

The bank regulatory agencies have established risk-based capital requirements for banks. These guidelines are intended to provide an additional measure of a bank’s capital adequacy by assigning weighted levels of risk to asset categories. Banks are also required to systematically maintain capital against such “off- balance sheet” activities as loans sold with recourse, loan commitments, guarantees and standby letters of credit. These guidelines are intended to strengthen the quality of capital by increasing the emphasis on common equity and restricting the amount of loan loss reserves and other forms of equity such as preferred stock that may be included in capital. Each of our subsidiary Banks’ objective is to maintain its current status as a “well-capitalized institution” as that term is defined by its regulators.

Under the terms of the guidelines, banks must meet minimum capital adequacy based upon both total assets and risk-adjusted assets. All banks are required to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8% and a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 4%. Adherence to these guidelines has not had an adverse impact on our Company.

Selected consolidated capital ratios at December 31, 2010, and 2009 were as follows:

Capital Ratios

(Dollars are in thousands)

 

     Actual     Well Capitalized     Excess  
     Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio     Amount  

As of December 31, 2010:

            

Total capital: (to risk weighted assets):

   $ 227,907         19.3   $ 118,230         10.0   $ 109,677   

Tier 1 capital: (to risk weighted assets):

   $ 212,986         18.0   $ 70,938         6.0   $ 142,048   

Tier 1 capital: (to average assets):

   $ 212,986         10.3   $ 103,053         5.0   $ 109,933   

As of December 31, 2009:

            

Total capital: (to risk weighted assets):

   $ 213,569         19.2   $ 110,960         10.0   $ 102,609   

Tier 1 capital: (to risk weighted assets):

   $ 199,583         18.0   $ 66,576         6.0   $ 133,007   

Tier 1 capital: (to average assets):

   $ 199,583         11.4   $ 87,831         5.0   $ 111,752   

 

65


Table of Contents

Effects of Inflation and Changing Prices

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on the performance of a financial institution than the effects of general levels of inflation. Although interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services, increases in inflation generally have resulted in increased interest rates. In addition, inflation affects financial institutions’ increased cost of goods and services purchased, the cost of salaries and benefits, occupancy expense, and similar items. Inflation and related increases in interest rates generally decrease the market value of investments and loans held and may adversely affect liquidity, earnings, and shareholders’ equity. Commercial and other loan originations and refinancings tend to slow as interest rates increase, and can reduce our earnings from such activities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements, other than approved and unfunded loans and letters and lines of credit to our customers in the ordinary course of business.

Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to Note 1(ad) in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion on the effects of new accounting pronouncements.

 

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Market risk is the risk of economic loss from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments due to changes in (a) interest rates, (b) foreign exchange rates, or (c) other factors that relate to market volatility of the rate, index, or price underlying the financial instrument. Our market risk is composed primarily of interest rate risk. Each of our subsidiary Banks has an Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) which is responsible for reviewing the interest rate sensitivity position, and establishing policies to monitor and limit the exposure to interest rate risk for their specific Bank. Substantially all of our interest rate risk exposure relates to the financial instrument activity of each of our subsidiary Banks. As such, the board of directors of each subsidiary Bank is responsible to review and approve the policies and guidelines established by their Bank’s ALCO.

The primary objective of asset/liability management is to provide an optimum and stable net interest margin, after-tax return on assets and return on equity capital, as well as adequate liquidity and capital. Interest rate risk is measured and monitored through gap analysis, which measures the amount of repricing risk associated with the balance sheet at specific points in time. See “Liquidity and Market Risk Management” presented in Item 7 above for quantitative disclosures in tabular format, as well as additional qualitative disclosures.

 

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The financial statements of our Company as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are set forth in this Form 10-K beginning at page 69.

 

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

 

66


Table of Contents
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Company maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based upon their evaluation of those controls and procedures performed within 90 days of the filing date of this report, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial officers of the Company concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Changes in internal controls. The Company made no significant changes in its internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation of those controls by the Chief Executive and Chief Financial officers.

Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting. Management of our Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to our company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Management performed an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 based upon criteria in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this assessment, management believes that our company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2010 because of the material weakness disclosed below.

In connection with its audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 Crowe Horwath LLP (Crowe Horwath), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, advised the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee and Management of a significant internal control deficiency that they consider to be a material weakness. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Our management and Crowe Horwath determined that our Company did not maintain effective internal control over specific reserves on impaired loans.

Plan of Remediation of Material Weakness. Our management and Crowe Horwath determined that the Company’s internal controls over downward adjustments to appraisals to reflect current market conditions were ineffective resulting in a material weakness as identified under “Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting” above. Our management has taken the following remedial actions to address the aforementioned material weaknesses.

First, the Company’s three national bank subsidiaries were combined under one charter during December 2010, and the credit oversight function is now centralized under the lead bank. Second, the Company’s CEO, the CEO of the Company’s lead subsidiary bank, the Company’s senior credit officer and a senior accounting officer will meet no less frequently than quarterly and one of these meetings will be at or near each calendar quarter end. The committee will be responsible for reviewing all loans identified as impaired pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 310 to ensure that values are reflective of current market conditions. Third, the Company’s outsourced internal auditing firm will periodically test management’s estimate of specific reserves on impaired loans.

 

Item 9B. Other Information.

Not applicable.

 

67


Table of Contents

PART III

 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Our Company has a Code of Ethics that applies to its principal executive officer and principal financial officer (who is also its principal accounting officer), a copy of which is included on the Company’s website, www.centerstatebanks.com, at Investor Relations/Governance Documents. The website also includes a copy of the Company’s Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter and Nominating Committee Charter. The information contained under the sections captioned “Directors” and “Executive Officers” under “Proposal One—Election of Directors,” and in the sections captioned “Audit Committee Report” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” in the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 28, 2011, to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of their registrant’s fiscal year end (the “Proxy Statement”), is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information contained in the sections captioned “Information About the Board of Directors and Its Committees” under “Proposal One—Election of Directors,” and the sections captioned “Executive Compensation,” “Director Compensation,” and “Compensation Committee Report,” in the Proxy Statement, is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information contained in the section captioned “Management and Principal Stock Ownership” under “Election of Directors,” and under the table captioned “Equity Compensation Plan Information” under “Executive Compensation” in the Proxy Statement, is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information contained in the section entitled “Certain Related Transactions” and the section entitled “Director Independence” under “Election of Directors” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information contained in the section captioned “Independent Auditors” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:

 

  1. Financial Statements

 

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm   
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009   
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008   
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive   
Income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements   

 

68


Table of Contents
  2. Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules have been omitted as the required information is either inapplicable or included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

  3. Exhibits

 

  3.1    -    Articles of Incorporation of CenterState Banks, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement No. 333-95087 (the “Registration Statement”))
  3.2    -    Bylaws of CenterState Banks, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement)
  3.3    -    Amendments to Articles of Incorporation of CenterState Banks, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K dated April 25, 2006).
  3.4    -    Amendment to bylaws of CenterState Banks, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Form 10-K dated March 7, 2008.)
  3.5    -    Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation authorizing the Preferred Shares (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated November 24, 2008.)
  3.6    -    Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation authorizing a change of the Corporation’s name from CenterState Banks Florida, Inc. to CenterState Banks, Inc. effective June 17, 2009. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to the Company’s Form 10-K dated March 4, 2010)
  3.7    -    Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation increasing the number of authorized common shares from 40,000,000 to 100,000,000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 16, 2009.)
  4.1    -    Specimen Stock Certificate of CenterState Banks, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registration Statement)
10.1    -    CenterState Banks, Inc. Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement)*
10.2    -    CenterState Banks, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Proxy Statement dated March 25, 2004)*
10.3    -    Form of CenterState Banks, Inc. Split Dollar Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated January 11, 2006)*
10.4    -    CenterState Banks, Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Appendix D to the Company’s Proxy Statement dated March 30, 2007)*
10.5    -    Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement between the Company and Ernest S. Pinner, its Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 31, 2008.)*
10.6    -    Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreements (“SERP”) between the Company and John C. Corbett and James J. Antal (Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 14, 2010.)*
10.7    -    Employment Agreements between the Company and John C. Corbett and James J. Antal (Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.4 and 10.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 14, 2010.)*
10.8    -    Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement (“SERP”) between the Company and Stephen D. Young, its Treasurer and Executive Vice President of the Company’s lead subsidiary bank, CenterState Bank of Florida, N.A.*

 

69


Table of Contents
10.9    -    Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement (“SERP”) between the Company and Rodney A. Anthony, its Chief Operations Officer and Executive Vice President of the Company’s lead subsidiary bank, CenterState Bank of Florida, N.A.*
10.10    -    Employment Agreement between the Company and Stephen D. Young, its Treasurer and Executive Vice President of the Company’s lead subsidiary bank, CenterState Bank of Florida, N.A.*
10.11    -    Employment Agreement between the Company and Rodney A. Anthony, its Chief Operations Officer and Executive Vice President of the Company’s lead subsidiary bank, CenterState Bank of Florida, N.A.*
10.12    -    Employment Agreement between the Company and Ernest S. Pinner, its President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated February 14, 2011.)*
14.1    -    Code of Ethics (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to the Company’s December 31, 2003 Form 10-K dated March 26, 2004)
21.1    -    List of Subsidiaries of CenterState Banks, Inc.
23.1    -    Consent of Crowe Horwath LLP
31.1    -    Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002
31.2    -    Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1    -    Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002
32.2    -    Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

* Represents a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit.

 

70


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES

Index to consolidated financial statements

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     72   

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009

     73   

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

     74   

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December  31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

     75   

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

     76   

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

     77   

 

71


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders

CenterState Banks, Inc.

Davenport, Florida

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CenterState Banks, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years ending December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting contained in Item 9A of the accompanying Form 10-K. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (Untied States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of authorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management’s report. The Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting for the allowance for loan losses. This material weakness was considered in the determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2010 consolidated financial statements. This matter does not affect our opinion on these 2010 consolidated financial statements.

In our opinion, because the effect of the material weakness described above, CenterState Banks, Inc. has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CenterState Banks, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years ending December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/    Crowe Horwath LLP

Crowe Horwath LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida

March 16, 2011

 

72


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2010 and 2009

(in thousands of dollars, except per share data)

 

      2010     2009  
Assets     

Cash and due from banks

   $ 23,251      $ 19,139   

Federal funds sold and Federal Reserve Bank deposits

     154,264        173,268   
                

Cash and cash equivalents

     177,515        192,407   

Trading securities, at fair value

     2,225        —     

Investment securities available for sale, at fair value

     500,927        463,186   

Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market

     673        —     

Loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements

     198,197        —     

Loans, excluding those covered by FDIC loss share agreements

     931,749        959,021   

Less allowance for loan losses

     (26,267     (23,289
                

Net loans

     1,103,679        935,732   

Accrued interest receivable

     6,570        6,378   

Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock

     10,122        7,908   

Bank premises and equipment, net

     84,982        62,368   

Deferred income taxes, net

     8,201        3,670   

Goodwill

     38,035        32,840   

Core deposit intangible

     3,921        2,422   

Bank owned life insurance

     27,440        15,665   

Other repossessed real estate owned covered by FDIC loss share agreements

     11,104        —     

Other repossessed real estate owned

     12,239        10,196   

FDIC indemnification asset

     59,098        —     

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     16,588        18,527   
                

Total assets

   $ 2,063,319      $ 1,751,299   
                
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity     

Deposits:

    

Interest bearing

   $ 1,362,370      $ 1,071,348   

Noninterest bearing

     323,224        233,688   
                

Total deposits

     1,685,594        1,305,036   

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase

     13,789        29,562   

Federal funds purchased

     68,495        144,939   

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     15,000        21,000   

Corporate debentures

     12,500        12,500   

Accrued interest payable

     1,148        1,268   

Settlement payments due FDIC

     6,258        —     

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

     7,891        7,584   
                

Total liabilities

     1,810,675        1,521,889   
                

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Preferred stock, $.01 par value, $1,000 liquidation preference; 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009

     —          —     

Common stock, $.01 par value: 100,000,000 shares authorized; 30,004,761 and 25,773,229 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively

     300        258   

Additional paid-in capital

     227,464        193,464   

Retained earnings

     21,964        28,623   

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     2,916        7,065   
                

Total stockholders’ equity

     252,644        229,410   
                

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 2,063,319      $ 1,751,299   
                

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 

73


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(in thousands of dollars, except per share data)

 

     2010     2009     2008  

Interest income:

      

Loans

   $ 55,697      $ 53,428      $ 57,403   

Investment securities available for sale:

      

Taxable

     16,833        18,436        7,822   

Tax-exempt

     1,424        1,472        1,512   

Federal funds sold and other

     626        608        1,345   
                        
     74,580        73,944        68,082   
                        

Interest expense:

      

Deposits

     15,722        20,521        24,936   

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase

     89        100        459   

Corporate debentures

     421        473        818   

Federal funds purchased

     107        553        200   

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     403        643        1,384   
                        
     16,742        22,290        27,797   
                        

Net interest income

     57,838        51,654        40,285   

Provision for loan losses

     29,624        23,896        6,520   
                        

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

     28,214        27,758        33,765   
                        

Other income:

      

Service charges on deposit accounts

     6,873        5,450        4,490   

Income from correspondent banking and bond sales division

     32,696        17,916        1,412   

Commissions from sale of mutual funds and annuities

     1,118        532        503   

Debit card and ATM fees

     1,890        1,341        1,075   

Loan related fees

     534        452        402   

Gain on sale of bank branch office real estate

     —          —          1,483   

BOLI income

     774        550        387   

Trading securities revenue

     622        427        —     

Net gain on sale of securities

     7,034        2,516        661   

Bargain purchase gain, acquisition of failed institution

     2,010        —          —     

Other service charges and fees

     2,015        868        394   
                        
     55,566        30,052        10,807   
                        

Other expenses:

      

Salaries, wages and employee benefits

     55,033        36,670        21,484   

Occupancy expense

     6,652        5,375        4,143   

Depreciation of premises and equipment

     3,350        2,882        2,590   

Marketing expenses

     2,498        1,910        1,359   

Data processing expense

     2,789        2,417        1,141   

Legal, audit and other professional fees

     3,764        2,354        1,245   

Supplies, stationary and printing

     1,091        848        743   

Core deposit intangible (CDI) amortization

     519        792        777   

Core deposit intangible impairment

     —          1,200        —     

Bank regulatory expenses

     2,989        3,114        1,230   

ATM and debit card related expenses

     1,298        1,060        724   

Postage and delivery

     735        425        367   

Loss on sale of repossessed real estate (“OREO”)

     756        772        51   

Valuation write down of repossessed real estate (“OREO”)

     2,951        2,188        434   

Loss on repossessed assets other than real estate

     458        544        125   

Foreclosure related expenses

     2,113        1,049        396   

Other expenses

     6,329        5,114        3,127   
                        

Total other expenses

     93,325        68,714        39,936   
                        

(Loss) Income before provision for income taxes

     (9,545     (10,904     4,636   

(Benefit) provision for income taxes

     (4,002     (4,687     1,215   
                        

Net (loss) income

   $ (5,543   $ (6,217   $ 3,421   
                        

(Loss) earnings per share:

      

Basic

   $ (0.20   $ (0.47   $ 0.26   
                        

Diluted

   $ (0.20   $ (0.47   $ 0.26   
                        

Common shares used in the calculation of (loss) earnings per share:

      

Basic

     27,608,211        17,905,042        12,452,375   
                        

Diluted

     27,608,211        17,905,042        12,585,036   
                        

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

74


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008

(in thousands of dollars)

 

    Number of
Preferred
Shares
    Preferred
Stock
    Number of
Common
Shares
    Common
stock
    Additional
paid-in
capital
    Retained
earnings
    Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income (loss)
    Total
stockholders’
equity
 

Balances at January 1, 2008

        12,436,407      $ 124      $ 110,604      $ 36,857      $ 697      $ 148,282   

Comprehensive income:

               

Net income

              3,421          3,421   

Unrealized holding gain on available for sale securities, net of deferred income taxes of $601

                958        958   
                     

Total comprehensive income

                  4,379   

Dividends paid ($0.16 per share)

              (1,993       (1,993

Stock options exercised, including tax benefit

        37,908        1        334            335   

Stock based compensation expense

            402            402   

Preferred stock issued pursuant to TARP

    27,875      $ 26,771                  26,771   

Preferred stock amortization of discount

      16              (16       —     

Warrant issued pursuant to TARP

            989            989   
                                                               

Balances at December 31, 2008

    27,875      $ 26,787        12,474,315      $ 125      $ 112,329      $ 38,269      $ 1,655      $ 179,165   

Comprehensive income:

               

Net loss

              (6,217       (6,217

Unrealized holding gain on available for sale securities, net of deferred income taxes of $3,397

                5,410        5,410   
                     

Total comprehensive loss

                  (807

Dividends paid—common ($0.07 per share)

              (1,139       (1,139

Dividends paid—preferred (5%)

              (1,196       (1,196

Stock options exercised, including tax benefit

        26,974          187            187   

Stock based compensation expense

            405            405   

Stock grants issued

        940          9            9   

Proceeds from public stock offering, net of $5,382 in underwriting fees and transaction costs

        13,271,000        133        80,746            80,879   

Preferred stock amortization of discount

      1,094              (1,094       —     

Redemption of perpetual preferred stock previously issued pursuant to TARP

    (27,875     (27,875               (27,875

Purchased warrants previously issued pursuant to TARP

            (212         (212

Adjustment to preferred stock and warrants

      (6               (6
                                                               

Balances at December 31, 2009

    —        $ —          25,773,229      $ 258      $ 193,464      $ 28,623      $ 7,065      $ 229,410   

Comprehensive income:

               

Net loss

              (5,543       (5,543

Unrealized holding loss on available for sale securities, net of deferred income taxes of $1,759

                (4,149     (4,149
                     

Total comprehensive loss

                  (9,692

Dividends paid—common ($0.04 per share)

              (1,116       (1,116

Stock options exercised, including tax benefit

        90,592        1        734            735   

Stock based compensation expense

            425            425   

Stock grants issued

        940          10            10   

Proceeds from public stock offering, net of $2,318 in underwriting fees and transaction costs

        4,140,000        41        32,831            32,872   
                                                               

Balances at December 31, 2010

    —        $ —          30,004,761      $ 300      $ 227,464      $ 21,964      $ 2,916      $ 252,644   
                                                               
                2010     2009     2008                    

Disclosure of reclassification amounts:

               

Unrealized holding gain arising during the year, net of income taxes

      $ 238      $ 6,979      $ 1,370         

Less: reclassified adjustments for gain included in net income, net of income taxes, at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 of $2,647, $947 and $249, respectively

        4,387        1,569        412         
                                 

Net unrealized gain (loss) on securities, net of income taxes

      $ (4,149   $ 5,410      $ 958         
                                 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

75


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(in thousands of dollars)

 

     2010     2009     2008  

Cash flows from operating activities:

      

Net (loss) income

   $ (5,543   $ (6,217   $ 3,421   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Provision for loan losses

     29,624        23,896        6,520   

Depreciation of premises and equipment

     3,350        2,882        2,590   

Amortization of purchase accounting adjustments

     (4,788     (800     581   

Impairment of core deposit intangible

     —          1,200        —     

Net amortization of investment securities

     6,235        5,017        36   

Net deferred loan origination fees

     (11     25        (268

Loss on sale of other real estate owned

     756        772        51   

Valuation write down on other real estate owned

     2,951        2,188        434   

Loss on sale of repossessed assets other than real estate

     270        227        85   

Valuation write down on repossessed assets other than real estate

     188        317        40   

Loss (gain) on sale or disposal of fixed assets

     25        (79     (1,470

Deferred income taxes

     (2,028     (5,386     (1,163

Net realized gain on sale or call of available for sale securities

     (7,034     (2,516     (661

Trading securities revenue

     (622     (427     —     

Purchases of trading securities

     (304,750     (32,714     —     

Proceeds from sale of trading securities

     303,147        33,141        —     

Gain on sale of loans held for sale

     (95     —          —     

Loans originated and held for sale

     (7,858     —          —     

Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale

     7,280        —          —     

Stock based compensation expense

     699        414        402   

Bank owned life insurance income

     (774     (550     (387

Bargain purchase gain from a FDIC assisted failed bank acquisition

     (2,010     —          —     

Cash provided by (used in) changes in:

      

Net change in accrued interest receivable, prepaid expenses, and other assets

     11,251        (7,519     (112

Net change in interest payable, accounts payable and accrued expenses

     (8,542     2,069        (1,858
                        

Net cash provided by operating activities

     21,721        15,940        8,241   
                        

Cash flows from investing activities:

      

Purchases of investment securities available for sale

     (336,692     (25,792     (21,083

Purchases of mortgage backed securities available for sale

     (272,152     (530,920     (117,401

Purchases of FHLB and FRB stock

     (866     (2,724     (2,320

Proceeds from callable investment securities available for sale

     198,865        11,039        11,613   

Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available for sale

     14,827        5,993        5,614   

Proceeds from pay-downs of mortgage backed securities available for sale

     127,599        143,570        32,761   

Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale

     34,817        43,333        26,012   

Proceeds from sales of mortgage backed securities available for sale

     200,456        159,524        12,022   

Proceeds from sales of FHLB and FRB stock

     272        143        2,401   

Purchase of bank owned life insurance

     (11,000     (5,000     —     

Decrease (increase) in loans, net of repayments

     3,324        (93,977     (59,126

Proceeds from the sale of loans in wholesale market

     8,579        —          —     

Purchases of premises and equipment, net

     (24,121     (3,917     (9,209

Proceeds from the sale of premises and equipment, net

     —          92        2,204   

Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned

     7,370        4,419        590   

Net cash from FDIC assisted acquisitions of failed banks

     55,368        —          —     

Net cash from acquisition of Ocala branches

     —          155,640        —     
                        

Net cash used in investing activities

     6,646        (138,577     (115,922
                        

Cash flows from financing activities:

      

Net increase in deposits

     37,208        132,536        21,146   

Net (decrease) increase in securities sold under agreement to repurchase

     (15,773     3,105        (6,671

Net (decrease) increase in federal funds purchased

     (76,444     55,963        88,976   

Net decrease in other borrowed funds

     (20,741     (4,750     (16,768

Net proceeds from preferred stock and warrant issuance

     —          —          27,760   

Redemption of perpetual preferred stock

     —          (27,875     —     

Repurchase of TARP warrant

     —          (212     —     

Adjustment to net proceeds from preferred stock and warrant issue

     —          (6     —     

Net proceeds from public stock offering

     32,872        80,879        —     

Stock options exercised, including tax benefit

     735        187        335   

Dividends paid

     (1,116     (2,335     (1,993
                        

Net cash (used in ) provided by financing activities

     (43,259     237,492        112,785   
                        

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

     (14,892     114,855        5,104   

Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of year

     192,407        77,552        72,448   
                        

Cash and cash equivalents, at end of year

   $ 177,515      $ 192,407      $ 77,552   
                        

Transfer of loans to other real estate owned

   $ 15,427      $ 13,081      $ 4,986   
                        

Cash paid during the year for:

      

Interest

   $ 17,853      $ 23,932      $ 28,328   
                        

Income taxes

   $ 422      $ 892      $ 2,796   
                        

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

76


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

(1) Summary of significant accounting policies

 

  (a) Nature of operations and principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements of CenterState Banks, Inc. (the “Company”) include the accounts of CenterState Banks, Inc. (the “Parent Company”), and its wholly owned subsidiaries CenterState Bank of Florida, N.A., Valrico State Bank and R4ALL, Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company, through its subsidiary banks, operates through 49 full service banking locations in thirteen counties throughout Central Florida, providing traditional deposit and lending products and services to its commercial and retail customers. The Company’s primary deposit products are checking, savings and term certificate accounts, and its primary lending products include commercial real estate loans, residential real estate loans, commercial loans and consumer loans. Substantially all loans are secured by commercial real estate, residential real estate, business assets or consumer assets. There are no significant concentrations of loans to any one industry or customer. However, the customers’ ability to repay their loans is dependent on the real estate and general economic conditions in the area.

The Company, through its CenterState Bank of Florida, N.A. subsidiary, also operates a correspondent banking and bond sales division. The division is integrated with and part of the lead subsidiary bank located in Winter Haven, Florida, although the majority of the bond salesmen, traders and support personnel are physically located in leased facilities in Birmingham, Alabama and Atlanta, Georgia. The primary revenue generating activity of this division is commissions earned on fixed income security sales. Other revenue generating activities include correspondent bank deposits (i.e. federal funds purchased), fees earned on correspondent bank checking accounts, fees earned from safe-keeping activities, bond accounting services for correspondents, and asset/liability consulting related activities.

R4ALL, Inc. is a non bank subsidiary incorporated during the third quarter of 2009. The primary purpose of this subsidiary is to purchase, hold, and dispose of troubled assets acquired from the Company’s subsidiary banks.

The following is a description of the basis of presentation and the significant accounting and reporting policies, which the Company follows in preparing and presenting its consolidated financial statements.

 

  (b) Use of estimates

To prepare financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and actual results could differ. Significant items subject to estimates and assumptions include allowance for loan losses, fair values of financial instruments, useful life of intangibles and valuation of goodwill, fair value estimates of stock-based compensation, fair value estimates of OREO, and deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

 

  (c) Cash flow reporting

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, money market and non interest bearing deposits in other banks with a purchased maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Net cash flows are reported for customer loan and deposit transactions, interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions, federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements, proceeds from capital offering and other borrowed funds.

 

77


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

  (d) Interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions

Interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions mature within one year and are carried at cost.

 

  (e) Trading securities

The Company engages in trading activities for its own account. Securities that are held principally for resale in the near term are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value included in earnings. Interest is included in net interest income.

 

  (f) Investment securities available for sale

Debt securities not classified as held to maturity or trading are classified as available for sale. Securities available for sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income, net of tax.

Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized on the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments, except for mortgage backed securities where prepayments are anticipated. Gains and losses on sales are recorded on the trade date and determined using the specific identification method.

Securities are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. For securities in an unrealized loss position, management considers the extent and duration of the unrealized loss, and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. Management also assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized as impairment through earnings. For debt securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: 1) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement and 2) other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) related to other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis.

 

  (g) Bond commissions revenue recognition

Bond sales transactions and related revenue and expenses are recorded on a settlement date basis. The effect on the financial statements of using the settlement date basis rather than the trade date basis is not material.

 

  (h) Loans held for sale

Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value, as determined by outstanding commitments from investors. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recorded as a valuation allowance and charged to earnings. Mortgage loans held for sale are generally sold with servicing rights released. Gains and losses on sales of mortgage loans are based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related loan sold.

 

 

78


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

  (i) Loans

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balance net of purchase premiums and discounts, deferred loan fees and costs, and an allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance.

Loan origination fees and the incremental direct cost of loan origination, are deferred and recognized in interest income without anticipating prepayments over the contractual life of the loans. If the loan is prepaid, the remaining unamortized fees and costs are charged or credited to interest income. Amortization ceases for nonaccrual loans.

A loan is moved to nonaccrual status in accordance with the Company’s policy typically after 90 days of non-payment, or less than 90 days of non-payment if management determines that the full timely collection of principal and interest becomes doubtful. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans.

All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on nonaccrual, is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. Non real estate consumer loans are typically charged off no later than 120 days past due.

The Company, considering current information and events regarding the borrower’s ability to repay their obligations, considers a loan to be impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. When a loan is considered to be impaired, the amount of the impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the secondary market value of the loan, or the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans. Impaired loans are written down to the extent that principal is judged to be uncollectible and, in the case of impaired collateral dependent loans where repayment is expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral and there is no other available and reliable sources of repayment, are written down to the lower of cost or collateral value. Impairment losses are included in the allowance for loan losses. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer and residential real estate loans, are collectively evaluated for impairment, and accordingly, they are not separately identified for impairment disclosures.

 

  (j) Certain acquired loans

As a part of business acquisitions, The Company acquires loans, some of which have shown evidence of credit deterioration since origination. These acquired loans are recorded at the allocated fair value, such that there is no carryover of the seller’s allowance for loan losses. After acquisition, losses are recognized by an increase in the allowance for loan losses.

 

 

79


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

Such acquired loans are accounted for individually or aggregated into pools of loans based on common risk characteristics such as, delinquency status, payment history, loan type, specific analysis and date of origination. The Company estimates the amount and timing of expected cash flows for each acquired loan or pool, and the expected cash flows in excess of amount paid is recorded as interest income over the remaining life of the loan or pool (accretable yield). The excess of the loan’s or pool’s contractual principal and interest over expected cash flows is not recorded (nonaccretable difference).

Over the life of the loan or pool, expected cash flows continue to be estimated. If the present value of expected cash flows is less than the carrying amount, a loss is recorded. If the present value of expected cash flows is greater than the carrying amount, it is recognized as part of future interest income.

 

  (k) Concentration of credit risk

Most of the Company’s business activity is with customers located within central Florida. Therefore, the Company’s exposure to credit risk is significantly affected by changes in the economy and the real estate market within central Florida.

 

  (l) Allowance for loan losses

The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Management estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions, and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off.

The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired. The general component covers loans that are not individually classified as impaired and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors.

A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans, for which the terms have been modified resulting in a concession, and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered troubled debt restructurings and classified as impaired.

Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.

Commercial, commercial real estate, land, acquisition and development, and construction loans over $500 are individually evaluated for impairment. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the

 

80


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer and residential real estate loans, are collectively evaluated for impairment, and accordingly, they are not separately identified for impairment disclosures. Troubled debt restructurings are separately identified for impairment disclosures and are measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective rate at inception. If a troubled debt restructuring is considered to be a collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported, net, at the fair value of the collateral. For troubled debt restructurings that subsequently default, the Company determines the amount of reserve in accordance with the accounting policy for the allowance for loan losses.

The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio segment and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the Company over the most recent two years. The portfolio segments identified by the Company are residential loans, commercial real estate loans, construction and land development loans, commercial and industrial and consumer and other. This actual loss experience is supplemented with other economic factors based on the risks present for each portfolio segment. These economic factors include consideration of the following: levels of and trends in delinquencies and impaired loans; levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of any changes in risk selection and underwriting standards; other changes in lending policies, procedures, and practices; experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; national and local economic trends and conditions; industry conditions; and effects of changes in credit concentrations.

During the fourth quarter of 2010 the Company changed its policy relating to the size of commercial, commercial real estate, land, acquisition and development, and construction loans to be individually evaluated for impairment from over $250 to over $500. The reason for the change was due to growth in the size of the Company as compared to its size when the initial $250 policy guideline was originally initiated.

 

  (m) Transfer of financial assets

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been relinquished. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when the assets have been isolated from the Company, the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

 

  (n) Foreclosed assets

Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. These assets are subsequently accounted for at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. If fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Operating costs after acquisition are expensed.

 

81


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

  (o) Premises and equipment

Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets (3 to 40 years). Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their useful lives or the term of the lease. Major renewals and betterments of property are capitalized; maintenance, repairs, and minor renewals and betterments are expensed in the period incurred. Upon retirement or other disposition of the asset, the asset cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and gains or losses are included in income.

 

  (p) Software costs

Costs of software developed for internal use, such as those related to software licenses, programming, testing, configuration, direct materials and integration, are capitalized and included in premises and equipment. Included in the capitalized costs are those costs related to both our personnel and third party consultants involved in the software development and installation. Once placed in service, the capitalized asset is amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life, generally three to five years. Capitalized costs of software developed for internal use are reviewed periodically for impairment.

 

  (q) Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) stock

The Company’s banks are members of the FHLB and FRB system. Members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors, and may invest in additional amounts. FHLB and FRB stock is carried at cost, classified as a restricted security, and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.

 

  (r) Bank owned life insurance (BOLI)

The Company, through its subsidiary banks, has purchased life insurance policies on certain key executives. Bank owned life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts due that are probable at settlement.

 

  (s) Goodwill and other intangible assets

Goodwill resulting from business combinations prior to January 1, 2009 represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill resulting from business combinations after January 1, 2009, is generally determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually. The Company has selected November 30 as the date to perform the annual impairment test. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite life on the Company’s balance sheet.

 

82


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

The core deposit intangibles are intangible assets arising from either whole bank acquisitions or branch acquisitions. They are initially measured at fair value and then amortized over a ten-year period on an accelerated basis using the projected decay rates of the underlying core deposits.

 

  (t) FDIC Indemnification Asset

The FDIC Indemnification Asset represents the estimated amounts due from the FDIC related to the Loss Share Agreements which were booked as of the acquisition dates of July 16, 2010 and August 20, 2010. The estimate represents the discounted value of the FDIC’s reimbursed portion of the estimated losses we expect to realize on the loans and other real estate (“Covered Assets”) acquired as a result of the acquisitions. As losses are realized on Covered Assets, the portion that the FDIC pays the Company in cash for principal and up to 90 days of interest reduces the FDIC Indemnification Asset. On a quarterly basis the Company will evaluate the FDIC Indemnification Asset to determine if the estimated losses on Covered Assets support the amount recorded as the FDIC Indemnification Asset. If the Company determines that it cannot support the FDIC Indemnification Asset, it will record a charge to earnings for the unsupported amount.

 

  (u) Loan commitments and related financial instruments

Financial instruments include off-balance sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans and commercial letters of credit, issued to meet customer financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.

 

  (v) Stock-based compensation

Compensation cost is recognized for stock options and restricted stock awards issued to employees, based on the fair value of these awards at the date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options, while the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted stock awards. Compensation cost is recognized over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period.

 

  (w) Income taxes

Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized

A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded.

The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in other expenses.

 

  (x) Retirement plans

Employee 401(k) plan expense is the amount of matching contributions. Deferred compensation and supplemental retirement plan expense allocates the benefits over years of service.

 

83


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

  (y) Marketing and advertising costs

Marketing and advertising costs are expensed as incurred.

 

  (z) Earnings per common share

Basic earnings per common share is net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. All outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends are considered participating securities for this calculation. Diluted earnings per common share includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options. Earnings and dividends per share are restated for all stock splits and stock dividends through the date of issuance of the financial statements.

 

  (aa) Comprehensive income

Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, which are also recognized as separate components of shareholders’ equity.

 

  (ab) Loss contingencies

Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management does not believe there now are such matters that will have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

  (ac) Restrictions on cash

Cash on hand or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank is generally required to meet regulatory reserve and clearing requirements.

 

  (ad) Dividend restriction

Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and may limit the dividends paid by the banks to the holding company or by the holding company to stockholders.

 

  (ae) Fair value of financial instruments

Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in a separate note. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates.

 

84


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

  (af) Segment reporting

The Company’s correspondent banking and bond sales division represents a distinct reportable segment which differs from the Company’s primary business of commercial and retail banking in central Florida. Accordingly, a reconciliation of reportable segment revenues, expenses and profit to the Company’s consolidated total has been presented in note 25.

 

  (ag) Reclassifications

Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

 

  (ah) Effect of new pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets. This guidance amends previous guidance relating to the transfers of financial assets and eliminates the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity. This guidance must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. This guidance must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the effective date. Additionally, on and after the effective date, the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity is no longer relevant for accounting purposes. Therefore, formerly qualifying special-purpose entities should be evaluated for consolidation by reporting entities on and after the effective date in accordance with the applicable consolidation guidance. Additionally, the disclosure provisions of this guidance were also amended and apply to transfers that occurred both before and after the effective date of this Statement. The effect of adopting this new guidance was not material.

 

(2) Trading Securities

During the third quarter of 2009, the Company initiated a trading securities portfolio at its lead subsidiary bank. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in trading securities revenue, a component of non interest income. Securities purchased for this portfolio have primarily been municipal securities. A list of the activity in this portfolio for 2010 and 2009 is summarized below.

 

     2010     2009  

Beginning balance

   $ —        $ —     

Purchases

     304,750        32,714   

Proceeds from sales

     (303,147     (33,141

Net realized gain on sales

     597        427   

Mark to market adjustment

     25        —     
                

Ending balance

   $ 2,225      $ —     
                

 

85


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

(3) Investment Securities Available for Sale

All of the mortgage backed securities (“MBS”) listed below are residential FNMA, FHLMC, and GNMA MBSs. The fair value of available for sale securities and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:

 

     December 31, 2010  
            Gross      Gross         
     Amortized      Unrealized      Unrealized      Fair  
     Cost      Gains      Losses      Value  

Obligations of U.S. government agencies and government sponsored enterprises

   $ 113,183       $ 732       $ 499       $ 113,416   

Mortgage backed securities

     348,990         6,563         1,295         354,258   

Municipal securities

     34,079         259         1,085         33,253   
                                   

Total

   $ 496,252       $ 7,554       $ 2,879       $ 500,927   
                                   
     December 31, 2009  
            Gross      Gross         
     Amortized      Unrealized      Unrealized      Fair  
     Cost      Gains      Losses      Value  

Obligations of U.S. government agencies and government sponsored enterprises

   $ 17,826       $ 128       $ 44       $ 17,910   

Mortgage backed securities

     398,482         11,467         169         409,780   

Municipal securities

     35,376         396         276         35,496   
                                   

Total

   $ 451,684       $ 11,991       $ 489       $ 463,186   
                                   

Sales of available for sale securities were as follows:

 

     2010      2009      2008  

Proceeds

   $ 235,273       $ 202,857       $ 38,034   

Gross gains

   $ 7,056       $ 2,567       $ 667   

Gross losses

   $ 22       $ 51       $ 6   

The tax provisions related to these net realized gains were $2,647, $947 and $249, respectively.

The fair value and amortized cost of available for sale securities at year end 2010 by contractual maturity were as follows. Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily mortgage-backed securities, are shown separately.

 

     Fair      Amortized  
      Value      Cost  

Investment securities available for sale

     

Due in one year or less

   $ —         $ —     

Due after one year through five years

     23,466         23,317   

Due after five years through ten years

     69,071         68,940   

Due after ten years through thirty years

     54,132         55,005   

Mortgage backed securities

     354,258         348,990   
                 
   $ 500,927       $ 496,252   
                 

 

86


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

Securities pledged at December 31, 2010 and 2009 had a carrying amount (estimated fair value) of $157,087 and $214,785, respectively. These securities were pledged primarily to secure public deposits and repurchase agreements.

At year-end 2010 and 2009, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than U.S. Government agencies and government sponsored enterprises, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders’ equity.

The following tables show the Company’s investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2010 and 2009.

 

     December 31, 2010  
     Less than 12 months      12 months or more      Total  
     Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Losses
     Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Losses
     Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Losses
 

Obligations of U.S. government entities and agencies

   $ 14,501       $ 499       $ —         $ —         $ 14,501       $ 499   

Mortgage backed securities

     130,937         1,295         —           —           130,937         1,295   

Municipal securities

     19,135         880         1,246         205         20,381         1,085   
                                                     

Total temporarily impaired securities

   $ 164,573       $ 2,674       $ 1,246       $ 205       $ 165,819       $ 2,879   
                                                     
     December 31, 2009  
     Less than 12 months      12 months or more      Total  
     Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Losses
     Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Losses
     Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Losses
 

Obligations of U.S. government entities and agencies

   $ 7,287       $ 44       $ —         $ —         $ 7,287       $ 44   

Mortgage backed securities

     46,537         169         —           —           46,537         169   

Municipal securities

     7,713         236         892         40         8,605         276   
                                                     

Total temporarily impaired securities

   $ 61,537       $ 449       $ 892       $ 40       $ 62,429       $ 489   
                                                     

Mortgage-backed securities: At December 31, 2010, 100% of the mortgage-backed securities held by the Company were issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies, primarily Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, institutions which the government has affirmed its commitment to support. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and illiquidity, and not credit quality, and because the Company does not have the intent to sell these mortgage-backed securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2010

Municipal securities: Unrealized losses on municipal securities have not been recognized into income because the issuers bonds are of high quality, and because management does not intend to sell these investments or more likely than not will not be required to sell these investments before their anticipated recovery. The fair value is expected to recover as the securities approach maturity.

 

87


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

(4) Loans

Major categories of loans included in the loan portfolio as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are:

 

     December 31,  
     2010      2009  

Loans not covered by FDIC loss share agreements:

     

Real estate:

     

Residential

   $ 255,571       $ 251,634   

Commercial

     410,162         438,540   

Construction, development, land

     109,380         115,937   
                 

Total real estate

     775,113         806,111   

Commercial

     100,906         98,273   

Consumer and other loans

     56,458         55,376   
                 
     932,477         959,760   

Less: Deferred loan origination fees, net

     728         739   

Less: Allowance for loan losses for noncovered loans

     26,267         23,289   
                 

Net loans not covered by FDIC loss share agreements

     905,482         935,732   

Loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements:

     

Real estate:

     

Residential

     111,472         —     

Commercial

     67,761         —     

Construction, development, land

     13,253         —     
                 

Total real estate

     192,486         —     

Commercial

     5,711         —     
                 

Total loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements

     198,197         —     
                 

Total net loans

   $ 1,103,679       $ 935,732   
                 

The Company has divided the loan portfolio into five portfolio segments, each with different risk characteristics and methodologies for assessing risk. The portfolio segments identified by the Company are residential loans, commercial real estate loans, construction and land development loans, commercial and industrial and consumer and other. We originate adjustable-rate and fixed-rate, residential real estate loans for the construction, purchase or refinancing of a mortgage. These loans are collateralized by owner-occupied properties located in the Company’s market area. Commercial real estate loans consist of loans to finance real estate purchases, refinancings, expansions and improvements to commercial properties. These loans are secured by first liens on office buildings, apartments, farms, retail and mixed-use properties, churches, warehouses and restaurants located within the market area. The Company’s underwriting analysis includes credit verification, independent appraisals, a review of the borrower’s financial condition, and a detailed analysis of the borrower’s underlying cash flows. Commercial real estate loans are larger than residential loans and involve greater credit risk. The repayment of these loans largely depends on the results of operations and management of these properties. Adverse economic conditions also affect the repayment ability to a greater extent than residential real estate loans. Construction loans consist of loans to individuals for the construction of their primary residences and, to a limited extent, loans to builders and commercial

 

88


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

borrowers. To the extent construction loans are not made to owner-occupants of single-family homes, they are more vulnerable to changes in economic conditions. Further, the nature of these loans is such that they are more difficult to evaluate and monitor. The risk of loss on a construction loan is dependent largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value upon completion of the project and the estimated cost (including interest) of the project. Commercial business loans and lines of credit consist of loans to small- and medium-sized companies in the Company’s market area. Commercial loans are generally used for working capital purposes or for acquiring equipment, inventory or furniture. Primarily all of the Company’s commercial loans are secured loans, along with a small amount of unsecured loans. The Company’s underwriting analysis consists of a review of the financial statements of the borrower, the lending history of the borrower, the debt service capabilities of the borrower, the projected cash flows of the business, the value of the collateral, if any, and whether the loan is guaranteed by the principals of the borrower. These loans are generally secured by accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. Commercial and industrial loans are typically made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business, which makes them of higher risk than residential loans and the collateral securing loans may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. We seek to minimize these risks through our underwriting standards. Consumer loans mainly consist of variable-rate and fixed-rate home equity lines-of-credit secured by a lien on the borrower’s primary residence. Most of our consumer loans share approximately the same level of risk as residential mortgages.

Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, are as follows:

 

     December 31,  
     2010     2009     2008  

Balance, beginning of year

   $ 23,289      $ 13,335      $ 10,828   

Charge-offs

      

Residential real estate loans

     (4,306     (3,442     (1,966

Commercial real estate loans

     (16,492     (3,001     (363

Construction, development and land loans

     (4,994     (6,457     (368

Non real estate commercial loans

     (774     (830     (856

Non real estate consumer and other loans

     (523     (353     (636
                        

Loans charged-off

     (27,089     (14,083     (4,189

Recoveries

      

Residential real estate loans

     178        16        88   

Commercial real estate loans

     42        6        7   

Construction, development and land loans

     167        43        —     

Non real estate commercial loans

     11        29        14   

Non real estate consumer and other loans

     45        47        67   
                        

Recoveries of previous charge-offs

     443        141        176   

Net charge-offs

     (26,646     (13,942     (4,013

Provision charged to operations

     29,624        23,896        6,520   
                        

Balance, end of year

   $ 26,267      $ 23,289      $ 13,335   
                        

 

89


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of December 31, 2010, excluding loans purchased from the FDIC with evidence of credit deterioration and covered by FDIC loss share agreements. Accrued interest receivable is not included in the recorded investment because it is not material.

 

    Real Estate Loans                    
    Residential     Commercial     Constr.,
develop.,
land
    Comm. &
industrial
    Consumer
& other
    Total  

Allowance for loan losses:

           

Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:

           

Individually evaluated for impairment

  $ 679      $ 1,981      $ 534        —          —        $ 3,194   

Collectively evaluated for impairment

    7,025        6,606        6,359        2,182        901        23,073   

Acquired with deteriorated credit quality

    —          —          —          —          —          —     
                                               

Total ending allowance balance

  $ 7,704      $ 8,587      $ 6,893      $ 2,182      $ 901      $ 26,267   
                                               

Loans, excluding loans covered by FDIC loss share:

           

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

    14,856        49,427        16,298        5,712        684        86,977   

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

    240,715        360,735        93,082        95,194        51,431        841,157   

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

    —          —          —          —          4,343        4,343   
                                               

Total ending loans balance

    255,571        410,162        109,380        100,906        56,458        932,477   
                                               

The following is a summary of information regarding impaired loans at December 31, 2010 and 2009:

 

Individually impaired loans were as follows:

   December 31,  
     2010      2009  

Impaired loans with no allocated allowance for loan losses

   $ 72,903       $ 63,557   

Impaired loans with allocated allowance for loan losses

     14,074         15,391   
                 

Total impaired loans

   $ 86,977       $ 78,948   
                 

Amount of the allowance for loan losses allocated to impaired loans

   $ 3,194       $ 4,612   
                 

Performing Trouble Debt Restructurings (TDRs)

   $ 10,591       $ 14,517   

Nonperforming TDRs, included in nonperforming loans

     11,731         11,982   
                 

Total TDRs (TDRs are required to be included in impaired loans)

   $ 22,322       $ 26,499   

Impaired loans that are not TDRs

     64,655         52,449   
                 

Total impaired loans

   $ 86,977       $ 78,948   
                 

 

90


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

Troubled Debt Restructurings:

Included in the Company’s $3,194 of total specific reserves, is $1,278 of specific reserves which the Company has allocated to customers whose loan terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings as of December 31, 2010. The Company has not committed to lend additional amounts to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings.

 

     2010      2009      2008  

Average of impaired loans during the year

   $ 82,695       $ 42,962       $ 19,526   

Interest income recognized on impaired loans during the impairment period during 2010 and 2009 was $2,330 and $1,731, respectively. Cash basis interest income recognized during these same periods was $2,234 and $1,590, respectively.

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of December 31, 2010. The recorded investment is less than the unpaid principal balance due to partial charge-offs.

 

     Unpaid
principal
balance
     Recorded
investment
     Allowance for
loan losses
allocated
 

With no related allowance recorded:

        

Residential real estate

   $ 13,313       $ 12,177       $ —     

Commercial real estate

     46,616         42,515         —     

Construction, development, land

     15,539         11,815         —     

Commercial

     5,712         5,712         —     

Consumer, other

     684         684         —     

With an allowance recorded:

        

Residential real estate

     2,679         2,679         679   

Commercial real estate

     7,123         6,912         1,981   

Construction, development, land

     4,483         4,483         534   

Commercial

     —           —           —     

Consumer, other

     —           —           —     
                          

Total

   $ 96,149       $ 86,977       $ 3,194   
                          

Nonperforming loans include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans.

 

Nonperforming loans were as follows:

   December 31,  
     2010      2009  

Non accrual loans

   $ 62,553       $ 42,059   

Loans past due over 90 days and still accruing interest

     3,200         282   
                 

Total non performing loans

   $ 65,753       $ 42,341   
                 

 

91


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual loans and loans past due over 90 days still on accrual by class of loans as of December 31, 2010, excluding loans acquired from the FDIC with evidence of credit deterioration:

 

     Nonaccrual      Loans past due
over 90 days
still accruing
 

Residential real estate

   $ 17,282       $ 1,820   

Commercial real estate

     28,364         869   

Construction, development, land

     15,546         366   

Commercial

     615         83   

Consumer, other

     746         62   
                 

Total

   $ 62,553       $ 3,200   
                 

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans as of December 31, 2010, excluding loans acquired from the FDIC with evidence of credit deterioration:

 

          Accruing Loans              
    Total     30 - 59
days past
due
    60 - 89
days past
due
    Greater
than 90 days
past due
    Total Past
Due
    Loans Not
Past Due
    Nonaccrual
Loans
 

Residential Real Estate

  $ 255,571      $ 4,901      $ 800      $ 1,820      $ 7,521      $ 230,768      $ 17,282   

Commercial Real Estate

    410,162        4,093        1,945        869        6,907        374,891        28,364   

Construction/Dev/Land

    109,380        2,575        619        366        3,560        90,274        15,546   

Commercial

    100,906        1,293        627        83        2,003        98,288        615   

Consumer

    52,115        710        236        62        1,008        50,361        746   
                                                       
  $ 928,134      $ 13,572      $ 4,227      $ 3,200      $ 20,999      $ 844,582      $ 62,553   

Credit Quality Indicators:

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis includes loans with an outstanding balance greater than $500 and non-homogeneous loans, such as commercial and commercial real estate loans. This analysis is performed on at least an annual basis. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Special Mention: Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard: Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful: Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

 

92


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans. As of December 31, 2010, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans, excluding loans with evidence of deterioration of credit quality purchased from the FDIC, is as follows:

 

Loan Category

   Pass      Special
Mention
     Substandard      Doubtful  

Residential Real Estate

   $ 216,164       $ 8,555       $ 30,852       $ —     

Commercial Real Estate

     336,869         19,300         53,993         —     

Construction/Dev/Land

     77,811         8,001         23,568         —     

Commercial

     88,290         2,806         9,810         —     

Consumer

     49,586         838         1,691         —     
                                   
   $ 768,720       $ 39,500       $ 119,914       $ —     

The Company considers the performance of the loan portfolio and its impact on the allowance for loan losses. For residential and consumer loan classes, the Company also evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan, which was previously presented, and by payment activity. The following table presents the recorded investment in residential and consumer loans, excluding loans with evidence of deterioration of credit quality purchased from the FDIC, based on payment activity as of December 31, 2010:

 

     Residential      Consumer  

Performing

   $ 236,469       $ 51,307   

Nonperforming

     19,102         808   
                 

Total

   $ 255,571       $ 52,115   
                 

Purchased Loans:

The Company has acquired loans, for which there was, at acquisition, evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments would not be collected. The carrying amount of those loans is as follows:

 

     December 31,  
     2010      2009  

Real estate:

     

Residential

   $ 111,472       $ —     

Commercial

     67,761         —     

Construction, development, land

     13,253         —     
                 

Total real estate loans

     192,486         —     

Commercial

     5,711         —     
                 

Total loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements

     198,197      

Consumer

     4,343         —     
                 

Total loans purchased from the FDIC

   $ 202,540       $ —     
                 

 

93


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

Accretable yield, or income expected to be collected, is as follows:

 

Balance at December 31, 2009

   $ —     

New loans purchased

     43,334   

Accretion of income

     (4,283

Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference

     —     
        

Balance at December 31,2010

   $ 39,051   
        

For those purchased loans discussed above, no allowance for loan losses was recorded in 2010.

Purchased loans for which it was probable at acquisition that all contractually required payments would not be collected are as follows:

 

     2010      2009  

Contractually required payments receivable of loans purchased during the year at acquisition

   $ 357,946       $ —     

Cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition

   $ 263,907       $ —     

Fair Value of acquired loans at acquisition

   $ 220,573       $ —     

 

(5) FDIC indemnification asset

The activity in the FDIC loss share indemnification asset which resulted from the July 16, 2010 acquisition of Olde Cypress Community Bank and the August 20, 2010 acquisitions of the Community National Bank of Bartow and Independent National Bank in Ocala loss share agreements is as follows:

 

     2010      2009  

Beginning of the year

   $ —         $ —     

Effect of acquisition

     57,951         —     

Discount accretion

     598         —     

Foreclosure expenses

     549         —     

Impairment

     —           —     
                 

End of the year

   $ 59,098       $ —     
                 

 

(6) Other real estate owned

Other real estate owned means real estate acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure. Activity in the valuation allowance was as follows:

 

     2010     2009     2008  

Beginning of year

   $ 1,704      $ 339      $ —     

Additions charged to expenses

     2,951        2,188        434   

Sales and/or dispositions

     (2,005     (823     (95
                        

End of year

   $ 2,650      $ 1,704      $ 339   

 

94


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

Expenses related to foreclosed real estate include:

 

     2010      2009      2008  

Net loss on sales

   $ 756       $ 772       $ 51   

Provision for unrealized losses

     2,951         2,188         434   

Operating expenses, net of rental income

     2,113         1,049         396   
                          

Total

   $ 5,820       $ 4,009       $ 881   

 

(7) Fair value

Generally accepted accounting principles establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).

The fair values of trading securities are determined as follows: (1) for those securities that have traded prior to December 31, 2010 but have not settled (date of sale) until after such date, the sales price is used as the fair value; and (2) for those securities which have not traded as of December 31, 2010, the fair value was determined by broker price indications of similar or same securities.

 

95


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below.

 

            Fair value measurements using  

at December 31, 2010

          Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
 

Assets:

           

Trading securities

   $ 2,225         —         $ 2,225         —     

Available for sale securities

           

U.S. government sponsored entities and agencies

     113,416         —           113,416         —     

Mortgage backed securities

     354,258         —           354,258         —     

Municipal securities

     33,253         —           33,253         —     

at December 31, 2009

                           

Assets:

           

Available for sale securities

           

U.S. government sponsored entities and agencies

   $ 17,910         —         $ 17,910         —     

Mortgage backed securities

     409,780         —           409,780         —     

Municipal securities

     35,496         —           35,496         —     

 

96


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below.

 

          Fair value measurements using  

at December 31, 2010

        Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
    Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
    Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
 

Assets:

       

Impaired loans

       

Residential real estate

  $ 2,000        —          —        $ 2,000   

Commercial real estate

    4,931        —          —          4,931   

Construction, land development and land

    3,949        —          —          3,949   

Commercial

    —          —          —          —     

Consumer

    —          —          —          —     

Other real estate owned

       

Residential real estate

  $ 2,372        —          —        $ 2,372   

Commercial real estate

    6,851        —          —          6,851   

Construction, land development and land

    3,016        —          —          3,016   

Commercial

    —          —          —          —     

Consumer

    —          —          —          —     

at December 31, 2009

                       

Assets:

       

Impaired loans

       

Residential real estate

  $ 2,266        —          —        $ 2,266   

Commercial real estate

    7,356        —          —          7,356   

Construction, land development and land

    1,157        —          —          1,157   

Commercial

    —          —          —          —     

Consumer

    —          —          —          —     

Other real estate owned

       

Residential real estate

  $ 3,155        —          —        $ 3,155   

Commercial real estate

    3,283        —          —          3,283   

Construction, land development and land

    3,758        —          —          3 758   

Commercial

    —          —          —          —     

Consumer

    —          —          —          —     

Excess bank real estate held for sale

  $ 2,368        —          —        $ 2,368   

Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $14,074, with a valuation allowance of $3,194, at December 31, 2010, and a carrying amount of $15,391, with a valuation allowance of $4,612, at December 31, 2009. The Company recorded a provision for loan loss expense of $2,455 and $4,220 on these loans during years ending 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses is generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Beginning with the reporting period ending June 30, 2009, the Company reclassified its impaired loans from a Level 2 to a Level 3 because of the volatility in the real estate market, the age of appraisals, and the periodic need, in managements’ judgment, to make adjustments to the appraisals to an amount which management expects to be ultimately collected.

 

97


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

The fair value of repossessed real estate (“other real estate owned” or “OREO”) is determined using Level 3 inputs which include current and prior appraisals and estimated costs to sell. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. The decline in fair value of other real estate owned was $2,951 and $2,188 during the twelve month periods ending December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Changes in fair value were recorded directly as an adjustment to current earnings through non interest expense.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value are described as follows:

Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, interest bearing deposits, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short-term debt, and variable rate loans or deposits that reprice frequently and fully. Security fair values are based on market prices or dealer quotes, and if no such information is available, on the rate and term of the security and information about the issuer. For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using underlying collateral values. For the FDIC indemnification asset, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life. Fair value of debt is based on current rates for similar financing. It was not practicable to determine the fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank stock or Federal Reserve Bank stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability. The fair value of off-balance-sheet items is not considered material.

The following tables present the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments:

 

     Dec 31, 2010      Dec 31, 2009  
     Carrying      Fair      Carrying      Fair  
     Amount      Value      Amount      Value  

Financial assets:

           

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 177,515       $ 177,515       $ 192,407       $ 192,407   

Trading securities

     2,225         2,225         —           —     

Investment securities available for sale

     500,927         500,927         463,186         463,186   

FHLB and FRB stock

     10,122         n/a         7,908         n/a   

Loans held for sale

     673         673         —           —     

Loans, less allowance for loan losses of $26,267 and $23,289, at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively

     1,103,679         1,110,844         935,732         945,993   

FDIC indemnification asset

     59,098         59,098         

Accrued interest receivable

     6,570         6,570         6,378         6,378   

Financial liabilities:

           

Deposits- without stated maturities

   $ 1,027,781       $ 1,027,781       $ 734,728       $ 734,728   

Deposits- with stated maturities

     657,813         668,673         570,308         576,237   

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase

     13,789         13,789         29,562         29,562   

Federal funds purchased (correspondent bank deposits)

     68,495         68,495         144,939         144,939   

Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowed funds

     15,000         15,113         21,000         21,274   

Corporate debentures

     12,500         6,075         12,500         6,865   

Accrued interest payable

     1,148         1,148         1,268         1,268   

 

98


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

(8) Bank Premises and Equipment

A summary of bank premises and equipment as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, is as follows:

 

     December 31,  
     2010      2009  

Land

   $ 32,647       $ 24,577   

Land improvements

     751         682   

Buildings

     45,351         36,315   

Leasehold improvements

     1,870         1,370   

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

     20,802         14,982   

Construction in progress

     3,314         1,247   
                 
     104,735         79,173   

Less: Accumulated depreciation

     19,753         16,805   
                 
   $ 84,982       $ 62,368   
                 

The Company leases land and certain facilities under noncancellable operating leases. The following is a schedule of future minimum annual rentals under the noncancellable operating leases:

 

Year ending December 31,

      

2011

   $ 1,137   

2012

     1,127   

2013

     1,123   

2014

     1,123   

2015

     1,123   
        
   $ 5,633   
        

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, was $1,245, $1,059 and $684, respectively, and is included in occupancy expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Rental income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, was $527, $489, and $364, respectively, and is included in occupancy expense.

 

(9) Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill was a result of whole bank acquisitions, all within the Company’s commercial and retail banking segment. The change in balance for goodwill during the years 2010, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:

 

     2010      2009      2008  

Beginning of year

   $ 32,840       $ 28,118       $ 28,118   

Acquired goodwill

     5,195         4,722         —     

Impairment

     —           —           —     
                          

End of year

   $ 38,035       $ 32,840       $ 28,118   
                          

Acquired intangible assets consists of core deposit intangibles (“CDI”) which are intangible assets arising from whole bank acquisitions. They are initially measured at fair value and then amortized over a ten-year

 

99


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

period on an accelerated basis using the projected decay rates of the underlying core deposits. The change in balance for CDI during the years 2010, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:

 

     2010     2009     2008  

Beginning of year

   $ 2,422      $ 3,948      $ 4,725   

Acquired CDI

     2,018        466        —     

Amortization expense

     (519     (792     (777

Impairment expense

     —          (1,200     —     
                        

End of year

   $ 3,921      $ 2,422      $ 3,948   
                        

Due to a sustained loss of previously acquired core deposit accounts combined with an overall decrease in the cost of alternative funds, a core deposit intangible impairment loss of $1,200 was recognized at year end 2009. The fair value used to determine the impairment loss was estimated using present value of expected future cash flows.

Acquired intangible assets were as follows for years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

 

     December 31, 2010      December 31, 2009  
     Gross             Gross         
     Carrying      Accumulated      Carrying      Accumulated  
     Amount      Amortization      Amount      Amortization  

Amortized intangible assets:

           

Core deposit intangibles

   $ 7,625       $ 3,704       $ 5,607       $ 3,185   

Estimated amortization expense for each of the next five years:

 

2011

   $ 660   

2012

     599   

2013

     492   

2014

     473   

2015

     469   

 

(10) Deposits

A detail of deposits at December 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:

 

     December 31,  
            Weighted            Weighted  
            Average            Average  
            Interest            Interest  
     2010      Rate     2009      Rate  

Non-interest bearing deposits

   $ 323,224         —     $ 233,688         —  

Interest bearing deposits:

          

Interest bearing demand deposits

     282,405         0.3     193,527         0.5

Savings deposits

     198,428         0.4     148,915         1.0

Money market accounts

     223,724         0.5     158,598         1.0

Time deposits less than $100,000

     266,744         1.5     258,078         2.2

Time deposits of $100,000 or greater

     391,069         1.8     312,230         2.4
                                  
   $ 1,685,594         0.8   $ 1,305,036         1.3
                                  

 

100


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

The following table presents the amount of certificate accounts at December 31, 2010, maturing during the periods reflected below:

 

Year

   Amount  

2011

   $ 403,228   

2012

     128,932   

2013

     27,847   

2014

     27,653   

2015

     69,175   

Thereafter

     978   
        

Total

   $ 657,813   
        

 

(11) Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase

The Company’s subsidiary banks enter into borrowing arrangements with their retail business customers by agreements to repurchase (“repurchase agreements”) under which the banks pledge investment securities owned and under its control as collateral against the one-day borrowing arrangement.

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had $13,789 and $29,562 in repurchase agreements. Repurchase agreements are secured by U.S. treasury securities and government agency securities with fair values of $41,131 and $72,567 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Information concerning repurchase agreements is summarized as follows:

 

     2010     2009     2008  

Average daily balance during the year

   $ 21,254      $ 24,276      $ 30,818   

Average interest rate during the year

     0.42     0.41     1.49

Maximum month-end balance during the year

   $ 25,367      $ 29,562      $ 36,825   

Weighted average interest rate at year end

     0.50     0.40     0.19

 

(12) Federal Funds Purchased

Federal funds purchased, as listed below, are overnight deposits from correspondent banks. The Company commenced accepting correspondent bank deposits during September 2008. Information concerning these deposits is summarized as follows:

 

     2010     2009     2008  

Average daily balance during the year

   $ 105,344      $ 228,815      $ 19,651   

Average interest rate during the period

     0.10     0.24     1.23

Maximum month-end balance during the year

   $ 139,032      $ 298,620      $ 88,976   

Weighted average interest rate at year end

     0.10     0.10     0.45

 

101


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

(13) Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowed funds

From time to time, the Company borrows either through Federal Home Loan Bank advances or Federal Funds Purchased, other than correspondent bank deposits listed in note 11 above. At year end, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank were as follows:

 

     2010      2009  

Daily overnight advances, the interest rate was 0.46% at December 31, 2008

   $ —         $ —     

Matured February 2, 2009, interest rate is fixed at 2.72%

     —           —     

Matured June 29, 2009, interest rate is fixed at 1.18%

     —           —     

Matured January 11, 2010, interest rate is fixed at 1.04%

     —           3,000   

Matured January 12, 2010, interest rate is fixed at 1.04%

     —           3,000   

Matured July 12, 2010, interest rate is fixed at 1.50%

     —           3,000   

Matures January 7, 2011, interest rate is fixed at 3.63%

     3,000         3,000   

Matures January 10, 2011, interest rate is fixed at 1.84%

     3,000         3,000   

Matures January 11, 2011, interest rate is fixed at 0.61%

     3,000         —     

Matures June 27, 2011, interest rate is fixed at 3.93%

     3,000         3,000   

Matures December 30, 2011, interest rate is fixed at 2.30%

     3,000         3,000   
                 

Total

   $ 15,000       $ 21,000   
                 

Each advance is payable at its maturity date, with a prepayment penalty for fixed rate advances. The advances were collateralized by $135,653 of pledged securities, and residential and commercial loans under a blanket lien arrangement at year end. Based on this collateral and the Company’s holdings of FHLB stock, the Company is eligible to borrow up to $87,655 at year end 2010.

 

(14) Corporate Debenture

In September 2003, the Company formed CenterState Banks of Florida Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”) for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. On September 22, 2003, the Company issued a floating rate corporate debenture in the amount of $10,000. The Trust used the proceeds from the issuance of a trust preferred security to acquire the corporate debenture. The trust preferred security essentially mirrors the corporate debenture, carrying a cumulative preferred dividend at a variable rate equal to the interest rate on the corporate debenture (three month LIBOR plus 305 basis points). The corporate debenture and the trust preferred security each have 30-year lives. The trust preferred security and the corporate debenture are callable by the Company or the Trust, at their respective option after five years, and sooner in specific events, subject to prior approval by the Federal Reserve, if then required. The Company has treated the trust preferred security as Tier 1 capital up to the maximum amount allowed under the Federal Reserve guidelines for federal regulatory purposes. The Company is not considered the primary beneficiary of this Trust (variable interest entity), therefore the trust is not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements, but rather the subordinated debentures are shown as a liability. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $310 and is included in other assets.

In September 2004, Valrico Bancorp Inc. (“VBI”) formed Valrico Capital Statutory Trust (“Valrico Trust”) for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. On September 9, 2004, VBI issued a floating rate corporate debenture in the amount of $2,500. The Trust used the proceeds from the issuance of a trust preferred security to acquire the corporate debenture. On April 2, 2007, the Company acquired all the assets and assumed all the liabilities of VBI pursuant to the merger agreement, including VBI’s corporate

 

102


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

debenture and related trust preferred security discussed above. The trust preferred security essentially mirrors the corporate debenture, carrying a cumulative preferred dividend at a variable rate equal to the interest rate on the corporate debenture (three month LIBOR plus 270 basis points). The corporate debenture and the trust preferred security each have 30-year lives. The trust preferred security and the corporate debenture are callable by the Company or the Valrico Trust, at their respective option after five years, and sooner in specific events, subject to prior approval by the Federal Reserve, if then required. The Company has treated the trust preferred security as Tier 1 capital up to the maximum amount allowed under the Federal Reserve guidelines for federal regulatory purposes. The Company is not considered the primary beneficiary of this Trust (variable interest entity), therefore the trust is not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements, but rather the subordinated debentures are shown as a liability. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $77 and is included in other assets.

 

(15) Income Taxes

Allocation of federal and state income tax expense (benefit) between current and deferred portions for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, is as follows:

 

     Current     Deferred     Total  

December 31, 2010:

      

Federal

   $ (1,772   $ (1,732   $ (3,504

State

     (202     (296     (498
                        
   $ (1,974   $ (2,028   $ (4,002
                        

December 31, 2009:

      

Federal

   $ 417      $ (4,499   $ (4,082

State

     107        (712     (605
                        
   $ 524      $ (5,211   $ (4,687
                        

December 31, 2008:

      

Federal

   $ 1,941      $ (985   $ 956   

State

     437        (178     259   
                        
   $ 2,378      $ (1,163   $ 1,215   
                        

 

103


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2010 and 2009, are presented below:

 

     December 31,  
     2010     2009  

Deferred tax assets:

    

Allowance for loan losses

   $ 9,819      $ 8,917   

Deferred loan fees

     255        252   

Stock based compensation

     413        293   

Deferred compensation

     980        872   

Impairment expenses

     290        402   

Net operating loss carryforward

     2,332        —     

Other real estate owned expenses

     1,269        701   

Nonaccrual interest

     243        291   

Other

     476        406   
                

Total deferred tax asset

     16,077        12,134   
                

Deferred tax liabilities:

    

Premises and equipment, due to differences in depreciation methods and useful lives

     (4,612     (2,700

Fair value adjustments

     (1,167     (1,138

Like kind exchange

     (293     (300

Unrealized gain on investment securities available for sale

     (1,759     (4,437

Accretion of discounts on investments

     (45     (64
                

Total deferred tax liability

     (7,876     (8,639
                

Net deferred tax asset

   $ 8,201      $ 3,495   
                

At December 31, 2010, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $5,764 for Federal and $7,497 for state which will begin to expire in 2030. Deferred tax assets are recognized for net operating losses because the benefit is more likely than not to be realized.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences.

 

104


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of the states of Florida, Georgia and Alabama. The Company is no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for the years before 2007. A reconciliation between the actual tax expense and the “expected” tax (benefit) expense, computed by applying the U.S. federal corporate rate of 34 percent is as follows:

 

     December 31,  
     2010     2009     2008  

“Expected” tax (benefit) expense

   $ (3,245   $ (3,707   $ 1,576   

Tax exempt interest, net

     (546     (546     (561

Bank owned life insurance

     (263     (187     (132

State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefits

     (329     (400     171   

Stock based compensation

     120        106        110   

Other, net

     261        47        51   
                        
   $ (4,002   $ (4,687   $ 1,215   
                        

 

(16) Related-Party Transactions

Loans to principal officers, directors, and their affiliates during 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

 

     2010     2009  

Beginning balance

   $ 36,508      $ 26,445   

New loans

     3,982        15,425   

Effect of changes in composition of related parties

     (13,629     —     

Repayments

     (3,536     (5,362
                

Ending balance

   $ 23,325      $ 36,508   
                

At December 31, 2010 and 2009 principal officers, directors, and their affiliates had $8,636 and $11,933, respectively, of available lines of credit.

Deposits from principal officers, directors, and their affiliates at year-end 2010 and 2009 were approximately $14,622 and $29,731, respectively.

 

(17) Regulatory Capital Matters

The Company and the Banks are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets. Management believes, as of December 31, 2010, that the Company meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

 

105


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

As of December 31, 2010, the most recent notification from the Office of Comptroller of the Currency and the FDIC categorized the Banks as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Banks must maintain total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution’s category.

A summary of actual, required, and capital levels necessary to be considered well-capitalized for the Company as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, are presented in the table below.

 

     Actual     For capital
adequacy purposes
    To be well
capitalized under
Prompt corrective
action provision
 
     Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio  

December 31, 2010:

               

Total capital (to risk weighted assets)

   $ 227,907         19.3   $ 94,584       ³ 8   $ 118,230       ³ 10

Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)

     212,986         18.0     47,292       ³ 4     70,938       ³ 6

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

     212,986         10.3     82,442       ³ 4     103,053       ³ 5

December 31, 2009:

               

Total capital (to risk weighted assets)

   $ 213,569         19.2   $ 88,768       ³ 8   $ 110,960       ³ 10

Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)

     199,583         18.0     44,384       ³ 4     66,576       ³ 6

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

     199,583         11.4     70,265       ³ 4     87,831       ³ 5

A summary of actual, required, and capital levels necessary to be considered well-capitalized for each of the Company’s subsidiary Banks as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, are presented in the table below.

 

     Actual     For capital
adequacy purposes
    To be well
capitalized under
prompt corrective
action provision
 
     Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio  

December 31, 2010

               

CenterState Bank of Florida, N.A.

               

Total capital (to risk weighted assets)

   $ 158,587         16.1   $ 78,625         >8   $ 98,281         >10

Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)

     146,201         14.9     39,312         >4     58,968         >  6

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

     146,201         7.9     74,440         >4     93,051         >  5

Valrico State Bank

               

Total capital (to risk weighted assets)

     24,762         15.2     13,071         >8     16,338         >10

Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)

     22,690         13.9     6,535         >4     9,803         >  6

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

     22,690         12.7     7,126         >4     8,908         >  5

 

106


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

     Actual     For capital
adequacy purposes
    To be well
capitalized under
prompt corrective
action provision
 
     Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio  

December 31, 2009:

               

CenterState Bank Central Florida, N.A.

               

Total capital (to risk weighted assets)

   $ 29,679         12.7   $ 18,769         >8   $ 23,462         >10

Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)

     26,705         11.4     9,385         >4     14,077         >  6

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

     26,705         8.9     12,034         >4     15,042         >  5

CenterState Bank, N.A.

               

Total capital (to risk weighted assets)

     37,932         14.0     21,752         >8     27,190         >10

Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)

     34,498         12.7     10,876         >4     16,314         >  6

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

     34,498         9.8     14,134         >4     17,667         >  5

CenterState Bank of Florida, N.A.

               

Total capital (to risk weighted assets)

     75,093         16.4     36,658         >8     45,823         >10

Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)

     69,347         15.1     18,329         >4     27,494         >  6

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

     69,347         7.4     37,689         >4     47,111         >  5

Valrico State Bank

               

Total capital (to risk weighted assets)

     23,722         16.3     11,624         >8     14,530         >10

Tier 1 capital (to risk weighted assets)

     21,880         15.1     5,812         >4     8,718         >  6

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

     21,880         11.9     7,353         >4     9,192         >  5

 

(18) Dividends

The Company declared and paid cash dividends on its common stock of $1,116, $1,139 and $1,993 during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company also paid dividends on its preferred stock issued pursuant to TARP of $1,196 during the year ended December 31, 2009. The Company repurchased all of its preferred stock issued pursuant to TARP on September 30, 2009 and is no longer subject to preferred stock dividend payments. Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid by the subsidiary banks to the Company without prior approval of the Bank’s regulatory agency. At December 31, 2010, dividends from the subsidiary banks available to be paid to the Company, without prior approval of the Banks’ regulatory agency, was $8,389, subject to the Banks meeting or exceeding regulatory capital requirements.

 

(19) Stock-Based Compensation

On April 24, 2007, the Company’s shareholders approved the CenterState 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”) and approved an amendment to the 2007 Plan on April 28, 2009. The 2007 Plan, as amended, replaces the 1999 Plan discussed below. The 2007 Plan, as amended, authorizes the issuance of up to 1,350,000 shares of the Company stock. Of this amount, 1,200,000 shares are allocated to employees, all of which may be issued as incentive stock options, and 150,000 shares are allocated to directors. During 2010, the Company granted employee incentive stock options for 70,800 shares, with a weighted average exercise price of $10.76 per share, pursuant to this plan. Options were granted at fair market value of the underlying stock at date of grant. Each option expires ten years from the date of grant. These options vest over a nine year period. In addition to incentive stock options, on February 2, 2010, the Company also awarded 152,000 shares of restricted stock with a fair value of $10.92 per share at the date of grate. On May 10, 2010, the

 

107


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

Company awarded 25,500 shares of additional restricted stock with a fair value of $12.11 per share at the date of grant. These restricted stock awards vest ratably over periods ranging from five to ten years. At December 31, 2010, there were a total of 374,110 shares available for future grants pursuant to this Plan.

In 1999, the Company authorized 730,000 common shares for employees of the Company under an incentive stock option and non-statutory stock option plan (the “1999 Plan”). Options were granted at fair market value of the underlying stock at date of grant. Each option expires ten years from the date of grant. Options became 25% vested immediately as of the grant date and continued to vest at a rate of 25% on each anniversary date thereafter until fully vested. There were no stock options granted pursuant to the 1999 Plan subsequent to December 31, 2006. The 2007 Plan, discussed above, replaced the 1999 Plan. At December 31, 2010 there were 421,454 stock options outstanding which were granted pursuant to the 1999 Plan, all of which were currently exercisable. No future stock options will be granted from this Plan.

In addition to the 1999 Plan, the Company assumed and converted the stock option plans of its subsidiary banks consistent with the terms and conditions of their respective merger agreements. These options are all vested and exercisable. At December 31, 2010, they represented exercisable options for 66,800 shares of the Company’s common stock.

In 2004, the Company’s shareholders authorized an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). The number of shares of common stock for which options may be granted under the ESPP is 400,000, which amount shall be increased on December 31 of each calendar year. At December 31, 2010, there were no options outstanding pursuant to this plan, and no activity occurred during the twelve month periods ending December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007 relating to our ESPP.

The Company’s stock-based compensation consists primarily of stock options and commencing in 2009 also includes restricted stock grants (“RSA”). During the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized total stock-based compensation expense as listed in the table below.

 

     2010      2009      2008  

Stock option expense

   $ 425       $ 405       $ 402   

RSA expense

     274         15         —     
                          

Total stock-based compensation expense

   $ 699       $ 420       $ 402   
                          

There is no income tax benefit provided for in the Company’s tax provision for qualified incentive stock options. The Company receives a tax benefit when a non qualified stock option is exercised. The total income tax benefit related to the exercise of non qualified stock options was approximately $66, $7 and $52 during the twelve month periods ending December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company provided an income tax benefit in its tax provision for RSA expenses of approximately $103, $5 and $0 during the twelve month periods ending December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

As of December 31, 2010, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options, net of estimated forfeitures, was approximately $2,366 and will be recognized over the next nine years. The weighted average period over which this expense is expected to be recognized is approximately 3.9 years.

As of December 31, 2010, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted grants, net of estimated forfeitures, was approximately $1,901 and will be recognized over the next ten years. The weighted average period over which this expense is expected to be recognized is approximately 4.7 years.

 

108


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

The Company granted stock options for 70,800, 145,000 and 540,000 shares of common stock during the twelve month periods ending December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The estimated fair value of options granted during these periods were calculated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted-average assumptions as of the grant date are as follows:

 

     2010     2009     2008  

Expected option life

     7.7 years        7.7 years        7.4 years   

Risk-free interest rate

     2.96     2.80     3.04

Expected volatility

     31.9     33.6     31.2

Dividend yield

     0.38     0.41     1.06

The Company determined the expected life of the stock options using the simplified method approach allowed for plain-vanilla share options as described in SAB 107. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect as of the grant date. Expected volatility was determined using historical volatility.

ASC 718 requires the recognition of stock-based compensation for the number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. As a result, for most awards, recognized stock compensation would be reduced for estimated forfeitures prior to vesting. Based on historical data, the Company expects the annual forfeiture rates to be immaterial. Estimated forfeitures will be reassessed in subsequent periods and may change based on new facts and circumstances. Prior to January 1, 2006, actual forfeitures were accounted for as they occurred for purposes of required pro forma stock compensation disclosures.

The weighted-average estimated fair value of stock options granted during the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $4.25 per share, $4.12 per share and $5.31 per share respectively.

The table below present’s information related to stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands of dollars):

 

     2010      2009      2008  

Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised

   $ 342       $ 58       $ 292   

Cash received from stock options exercised

     669         180         283   

Gross income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options

     66         7         52   

A summary of stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (dollars are in thousands, except for per share data):

 

    December 31, 2010     December 31, 2009     December 31, 2008  
          Weighted-           Weighted-           Weighted-  
          Average           Average           Average  
    Number of     Exercise     Number of     Exercise     Number of     Exercise  
    Options     Price     Options     Price     Options     Price  

Options outstanding, beginning of period

    1,319,846      $ 13.39        1,224,556      $ 13.66        737,674      $ 12.26   

Options granted

    70,800      $ 10.76        145,500      $ 10.15        540,000      $ 15.14   

Options exercised

    (90,592   $ 7.38        (26,974   $ 6.68        (37,908   $ 7.45   

Options forfeited

    (35,000   $ 16.56        (23,236   $ 15.13        (15,210   $ 13.81   
                                               

Options outstanding, end of period

    1,265,054      $ 13.59        1,319,846      $ 13.39        1,224,556      $ 13.66   
                                               

 

109


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

            Weighted-      Weighted-         
            Average      Average      Aggregate  
     Number of      Exercise      Contractual      Intrinsic  
     Options      Price      Term      Value  

Options outstanding, December 31, 2010

     1,265,054       $ 13.59         5.8 years       $ 136   

Options fully vested and expected to vest, December 31, 2010

     1,165,717       $ 13.66         5.6 years       $ 136   

Options exercisable, December 31, 2010

     645,754       $ 13.43         4.0 years       $ 136   

 

(20) Employee Benefit Plan

Substantially all of the Company’s employees are covered under it’s 401(k) defined contribution retirement plan. Employees are eligible to participate in the plan after completing six months of continuous employment. The Company contributes an amount equal to a certain percentage of the employees’ contributions based on the discretion of the Board of Directors. In addition, the Company may also make additional contributions to the plan each year, subject to profitability and other factors, and based solely on the discretion of the Board of Directors. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company’s contributions to the plan were $814, $541 and $556, respectively, which are included in salary and benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In 2008, the Company entered into a salary continuation agreement with its chief executive officer. Five additional Company executive officers entered into salary continuation agreements during 2010. In 2007, an additional four pre-existing salary continuation agreements with certain Valrico State Bank’s executive officers were assumed as part of the acquisition. The plans are nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements that are designed to provide supplemental retirement income benefits to participants. The Company expensed $342, $232 and $149 for the accrual of future salary continuation benefits in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Other liabilities included salary continuation benefits payable of $1,563, $1,222 and $989 at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

In 2007, the Company entered into deferred compensation arrangements, through Rabbi Trust agreements, with two Valrico State Bank’s executive officers pursuant to the acquisition. The Rabbi Trust asset is included in other assets, and the related deferred compensation payable is included in other liabilities. The Rabbi Trust asset and the related deferred compensation payable at December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 were $986, $922 and $750, respectively. Earnings from the Rabbi Trust increase the asset and increase the deferred compensation payable. Losses from the Rabbi Trust decrease the asset and decrease the deferred compensation payable. There is no net income statement effect other than the administration expenses of the Trust which approximates $5 per year.

 

110


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

(21) Parent Company Only Financial Statements

Condensed financial statements of CenterState Banks of Florida, Inc. (parent company only) follow:

Condensed Balance Sheet

December 31, 2010 and 2009

 

      2010      2009  
Assets:      

Cash and due from banks

   $ 679       $ 302   

Inter-company receivable from bank subsidiaries

     15,516         37,305   

Investment in wholly-owned bank subsidiaries

     217,502         194,757   

Investment in other wholly-owned subsidiary

     30,214         9,513   

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     3,771         2,458   
                 

Total assets

   $ 267,682       $ 244,335   
                 
Liabilities:      

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   $ 2,538       $ 2,425   

Corporate debenture

     12,500         12,500   
                 

Total liabilities

     15,038         14,925   
Stockholders’ Equity:      

Preferred stock

     —           —     

Common stock

     300         258   

Additional paid-in capital

     227,464         193,464   

Retained earnings

     21,964         28,623   

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     2,916         7,065   
                 

Total stockholders’ equity

     252,644         229,410   
                 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 267,682       $ 244,335   
                 

Condensed Statements of Operations

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

     2010     2009     2008  

Other income

   $ —        $ —        $ 1   

Interest expense

     421        473        818   

Operating expenses

     2,741        2,576        2,594   
                        

Loss before equity in net earnings of subsidiaries

     (3,162     (3,049     (3,411

Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries (net of income tax (benefit) expense of ($2,843), ($3,559) and $2,364 at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively)

     (3,540     (4,296     5,683   
                        

Net income before income tax benefit

     (6,702     (7,345     2,272   

Income tax benefit

     (1,159     (1,128     (1,149
                        

Net (loss) income

   $ (5,543   $ (6,217   $ 3,421   
                        

 

111


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

     2010     2009     2008  

Cash flows from operating activities:

      

Net (loss) income

   $ (5,543   $ (6,217   $ 3,421   

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used in operating activities:

      

Equity in net loss (earnings) of subsidiaries

     3,540        4,296        (5,683

Increase (decrease) in payables and accrued expenses

     131        209        (334

Increase in other assets

     (1,374     (420     (10

Stock based compensation expense

     97        125        402   
                        

Net cash flows used in operating activities

     (3,149     (2,007     (2,204
                        

Cash flows from investing activities:

      

Inter-company receivables from subsidiary banks

     32,581        (2,300     (18,000

Cash payments to VSB shareholders

     (1     (562     (338

Cash payments to Mid FL shareholders

     (17     (89     (6

Investment in subsidiaries

     (61,528     (46,457     (5,000
                        

Net cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities

     (28,965     (49,408     (23,344
                        

Cash flows from financing activities:

      

Stock options exercised, net of tax benefit

     735        188        335   

Dividends paid to shareholders

     (1,116     (2,335     (1,993

Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and warrant

     —          —          27,760   

Proceeds from public stock offering

     32,872        80,879        —     

Adjustment to preferred stock and warrants

     —          (6     —     

Redemption of preferred stock previously issued pursuant to TARP

     —          (27,875     —     

Purchased warrants previously issued pursuant to TARP

     —          (212     —     
                        

Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities

     32,491        50,639        26,102   
                        

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

     377        (776     554   

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

     302        1,078        524   
                        

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

   $ 679      $ 302      $ 1,078   
                        

 

112


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

(22) Credit Commitments

The Company has outstanding at any time a significant number of commitments to extend credit. These arrangements are subject to strict credit control assessments and each customer’s credit worthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. A summary of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit written at December 31, 2010 and 2009, are as follows:

 

     December 31,  
     2010      2009  

Standby letters of credit

   $ 2,643       $ 5,309   

Available lines of credit

     68,495         94,573   

Unfunded loan commitments—fixed

     7,630         5,698   

Unfunded loan commitments—variable

     6,616         1,691   

Because many commitments expire without being funded in whole or part, the contract amounts are not estimates of future cash flows.

Credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed completely to perform as contracted. The credit risk amounts are equal to the contractual amounts, assuming that the amounts are fully advanced and that the collateral or other security is of no value.

The Company’s policy is to require customers to provide collateral prior to the disbursement of approved loans. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, real estate and income providing commercial properties.

Standby letters of credit are contractual commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.

Outstanding commitments are deemed to approximate fair value due to the variable nature of the interest rates involved and the short-term nature of the commitments.

 

(23) Concentrations of Credit Risk

Most of the Company’s business activity is with customers located within Osceola, Orange, Pasco, Hernando, Citrus, Sumter, Lake, Hillsborough, Polk, Okeechobee, Indian River, Hendry, Marion and Putnam Counties of the State of Florida and portions of adjacent counties. The majority of commercial and mortgage loans are granted to customers doing business or residing in these areas. Generally, commercial loans are secured by real estate, and mortgage loans are secured by either first or second mortgages on residential or commercial property. As of December 31, 2010, substantially all of the Company’s loan portfolio was secured. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is dependent upon the economy of those Counties listed above and portions of adjacent counties. The Company does not have significant exposure to any individual customer or counterparty.

 

(24) Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods. Diluted earnings per share includes the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods and the further dilution from stock options using the treasury method. There were 1,265,054 stock

 

113


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

options outstanding at December 31, 2010, all of which are considered anti dilutive. The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the periods presented.

 

     2010     2009     2008  

Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:

      

Net (loss) income

   $ (5,543   $ (6,217   $ 3,421   

Preferred stock dividend

     —          (1,045     (151

Preferred stock discount accretion

     —          (1,088     (16
                        

Net income available for common shareholders

   $ (5,543   $ (8,350   $ 3,254   
                        

Denominator:

      

Denominator for basic earnings per share

      

—weighted-average shares

     27,608,211        17,905,042        12,452,375   

Effect of dilutive securities:

      

Employee stock based compensation awards

     —          —          132,661   
                        

Denominator for diluted earnings per share

      

—adjusted weighted-average shares

     27,608,211        17,905,042        12,585,036   
                        

Basic (loss) earnings per share

   $ (0.20   $ (0.47   $ 0.26   

Diluted (loss) earnings per share

   $ (0.20   $ (0.47   $ 0.26   

 

(25) Reportable segments

The Company’s reportable segments represent the distinct product lines the Company offers and are viewed separately for strategic planning purposes by management. The tables below are reconciliations of the reportable segment revenues, expenses, and profit as viewed by management to the Company’s consolidated total for the year ending December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

Year ending December 31, 2010

 

     Commercial
and retail
banking
    Correspondent
banking and
bond sales
division
    Corporate
overhead and
administration
    Elimination
entries
    Total  

Interest income

   $ 69,493      $ 5,087      $ —          $ 74,580   

Interest expense

     (16,201     (120     (421       (16,742
                                  

Net interest income

     53,292        4,967        (421       57,838   

Provision for loan losses

     (29,619     (5     —            (29,624

Other interest income

     21,252        34,314        —            55,566   

Other interest expense

     (61,747     (28,837     (2,741       (93,325
                                  

Net (loss) income before taxes

     (16,822     10,439        (3,162       (9,545

Income tax benefit (provision)

     6,771        (3,928     1,159          4,002   
                                  

Net (loss) income

   $ (10,051   $ 6,511      $ (2,003     $ (5,543
                                  

Total assets

   $ 1,928,934      $ 137,772      $ 267,682      $ (271,069   $ 2,063,319   
                                        

 

114


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

Year ending December 31, 2009

 

     Commercial
and retail
banking
    Correspondent
banking and
bond sales
division
    Corporate
overhead and
administration
    Elimination
entries
    Total  

Interest income

   $ 66,749      $ 7,195      $ —          $ 73,944   

Interest expense

     (21,244     (573     (473       (22,290
                                  

Net interest income

     45,505        6,622        (473       51,654   

Provision for loan losses

     (23,287     (12     —            (23,299

Other interest income

     11,306        18,746        —            30,052   

Other interest expense

     (50,781     (15,954     (2,576       (69,311
                                  

Net (loss) income before taxes

     (17,257     9,402        (3,049       (10,904

Income tax benefit (provision)

     6,841        (3,282     1,128          4,687   
                                  

Net (loss) income

   $ (10,416   $ 6,120      $ (1,921     $ (6,217
                                  

Total assets

   $ 1,555,611      $ 201,018      $ 244,335      $ (249,665   $ 1,751,299   
                                        

Year ending December 31, 2008

 

     Commercial
and retail
banking
    Correspondent
banking and
bond sales
division
    Corporate
overhead and
administration
    Elimination
entries
    Total  

Interest income

   $ 67,906      $ 176      $ —          $ 68,082   

Interest expense

     (26,779     (200     (818       (27,797
                                  

Net interest income

     41,127        (24     (818       40,285   

Provision for loan losses

     (6,520     —          —            (6,520

Other interest income

     9,395        1,412        —            10,807   

Other interest expense

     (36,340     (1,006     (2,590       (39,936
                                  

Net income (loss) before taxes

     7,662        382        (3,408       4,636   

Income tax (provision) benefit

     (2,220     (144     1,149          (1,215
                                  

Net income (loss)

   $ 5,442      $ 238      $ (2,259     $ 3,421   
                                  

Total assets

   $ 1,243,232      $ 89,615      $ 194,532      ($ 194,236   $ 1,333,143   
                                        

Commercial and retail banking: The Company’s primary business is commercial and retail banking. Currently, the Company operates through two subsidiary banks and non bank subsidiary, R4ALL, with 49 locations in thirteen counties throughout Central Florida providing traditional deposit and lending products and services to its commercial and retail customers.

Correspondent banking and bond sales division: Operating as a division of the Company’s largest subsidiary bank, its primary revenue generating activities are as follows: 1) the first, and largest, revenue generator is commissions earned on fixed income security sales; 2) the second category includes: spread income earned on correspondent bank deposits (i.e., federal funds purchased) and service fees on correspondent bank checking accounts; and, 3) the third, and smallest revenue generating category, includes fees from safe-keeping activities, bond accounting services for correspondents, and asset/liability consulting related activities. The customer base includes small to medium size financial institutions primarily located in Florida, Alabama and Georgia.

 

115


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

Corporate overhead and administration: Corporate overhead and administration is comprised primarily of compensation and benefits for certain members of management, interest on parent company debt, office occupancy and depreciation of parent company facilities, merger related costs and other expenses.

 

(26) Business combinations

The Company, through its lead bank headquartered in Winter Haven, Florida, purchased four failed financial institutions from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). On January 30, 2009 it purchased Ocala National Bank (“ONB”) in Ocala, Florida. On July 16, 2010 it purchased Olde Cypress Community Bank (“OCCB”) in Clewiston, Florida. On August 20, 2010, the Company purchased Independent National Bank (“INB”) in Ocala, Florida, and on the same day it also purchased the Community National Bank of Bartow (“CNBB”) in Bartow, Florida.

As a result of these acquisitions, the Company expects to further solidify its market share in the central Florida market, expand its customer base to enhance deposit fee income, and reduce operating costs through economies of scale. We acquired the real estate, banking facilities, furniture or equipment as part of the Purchase and Assumption Agreements. All of the goodwill and core deposit intangible listed below is tax deductible over a 15 year period on a straight line basis. The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.

 

Acquired institution

Date of acquisition

  ONB
Jan 30, 2009
    OCCB
July 16, 2010
    INB
Aug 20, 2010
    CNBB
Aug 20, 2010
 

Assets:

       

Cash, due from banks and Federal Reserve Bank, net

  $ 155,640      $ 18,643      $ 8,378      $ 10,720   

Federal funds sold

        17,627     

Securities available for sale

    11,549        8,509        1,416        1,564   

Loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements

      89,601        87,358        35,752   

Loans not covered by FDIC loss share

      3,759        1,236        2,867   

Covered repossessed real estate owned (“OREO”)

      6,388        1,140        1,268   

FDIC indemnification asset

      26,637        21,477        9,837   

FHLB stock and FRB stock

      305        954        361   

Goodwill

    4,722          3,490        1,704   

Core deposit intangible

    466        714        968        336   

Receivable from the FDIC

        10,872     

Other assets

    8,113        1,159        443        330   
                               

Total assets acquired

  $ 180,490      $ 155,715      $ 155,359      $ 64,739   
                               

Liabilities:

       

Deposits

  $ 180,182      $ 152,264      $ 144,393      $ 47,683   

FHLB advances

        10,591        4,150   

Escrow accounts

      1,308       

Payable to FDIC

          12,860   

Other liabilities

    308        133        375        46   
                               

Total liabilities assumed

  $ 180,490      $ 153,705      $ 155,359      $ 64,739   
                               

Net assets acquired

    $ 2,010       
             

Deferred tax impact

      775       
             

Net assets acquired, including deferred tax impact

    $ 1,235       
             

 

116


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

The Company entered into loss share agreements with the FDIC that collectively cover legal unpaid balances of substantially all the loans acquired (except those loans identified above as not covered by FDIC loss share) and all the OREO acquired (collectively, the “Covered Assets”). Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC’s obligation to reimburse the Company for losses with respect to Covered Assets begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. The FDIC will reimburse the Company for 80% of losses with respect to the Covered Assets. The Company will reimburse the FDIC for its share of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid the Company a reimbursement under the loss sharing agreements. The loss share agreements applicable to single family residential mortgage loans provide for FDIC loss sharing and Company reimbursement to the FDIC for recoveries for ten years. The loss share agreements applicable to commercial loans and other Covered Assets provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years and Company reimbursement to the FDIC for a total of eight years for recoveries.

The acquisitions were accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. Both the purchased assets and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective acquisition date fair values. Determining the fair values of assets and liabilities, especially the loan portfolio and foreclosed real estate, is a complicated process involving significant judgment regarding methods and assumptions used to calculate estimated fair values. Fair values are preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional information regarding the closing date fair values become available.

All of the loans acquired are being accounted for pursuant to ASC Topic 310-30. We arrived at this conclusion as follows.

First, we segregated all acquired loans with specifically identified credit deficiency factor(s). The factors we used were all acquired loans that were non-accrual, 60 days or more past due, designated as Trouble Debt Restructured (“TDR”), graded “special mention” or “substandard,” had more than five 30 day past due notices or had any 60 day or 90 day past due notices during the loan term. For this disclosure purpose, we refer to these loans as Type A loans. As required by generally accepted accounting principles, we are accounting for these loans pursuant to ASC Topic 310-30. Second, all remaining acquired loans, those without specifically identified credit deficiency factors, we refer to as Type B loans for disclosure purposes, were then grouped into pools with common risk characteristics. These loans were then evaluated to determine estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Although no specific credit deficiencies were identifiable, we believe there is an element of risk as to whether all contractual cash flows will be eventually received. Factors that were considered included the poor economic environment both nationally and locally as well as the unfavorable real estate market particularly in Florida. In addition, these loans were acquired from three failed financial institutions, which implies potentially deficient, or at least questionable, credit underwriting. Based on management’s estimate of fair value, each of these pools was assigned a discount credit mark. We have applied ASC Topic 310-30 accounting treatment by analogy to Type B loans. The result is that all loans acquired from these three failed financial institutions will be accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30.

 

117


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

The table below summarizes the total contractually required principal and interest cash payments, management’s estimate of expected total cash payments and fair value of the loans as of the respective acquisition dates and as of December 31, 2010.

 

     at acquisition dates              
     Type A     Type B           2010     Total  

in thousands of dollars:

   loans     loans     Total     activity     Dec. 31, 2010  

Contractually required principal and interest

   $ 182,967      $ 174,979      $ 357,946        (22,316   $ 335,630   

Non-accretable difference

     (65,655     (28,384     (94,039     —          (94,039
                                        

Cash flows expected to be collected

     117,312        146,595        263,907        (22,316     241,591   

Accretable yield

     (27,056     (16,278     (43,334     4,283        (39,051
                                        

Total acquired loans

   $ 90,256      $ 130,317      $ 220,573      $ (18,033   $ 202,540   
                                        

Type A loans: acquired loans with specifically identified credit deficiency factor(s).

Type B loans: all other acquired loans.

Income on acquired loans, whether Type As or Type Bs, is recognized in the same manner pursuant to ASC Topic 310-30. A portion of the fair value discount has been ascribed as an accretable yield that is accreted into interest income over the estimated remaining life of the loans. The remaining non-accretable difference represents cash flows not expected to be collected.

The operating results of the Company for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010 includes the operating results of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities since the acquisition date of July 16, 2010 for Olde Cypress and August 20, 2010 for Community National and Independent National. Due primarily to the significant amount of fair value adjustments and the Loss Share Agreements now in place, historical results of Olde Cypress, Community National, and Independent National are not believed to be relevant to the Company’s results, and thus no pro forma information is presented.

 

(27) Capital offering

On August 4, 2009, the Company raised approximately $86,261 through a previously announced public offering by issuing 13,271,000 shares of common stock, including 1,731,000 shares pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option. The net proceeds of the offering, after all expenses including underwriters’ fees, were approximately $81,300.

On July 27, 2010, the Company raised approximately $35,190 through a previously announced public offering by issuing 4,140,000 shares of common stock, including 540,000 shares pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option. The net proceeds of the offering, after all expenses including underwriters’ fees, were approximately $32,872.

 

(28) Preferred stock

On November 21, 2008, as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program, the Company issued and sold to the U. S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”), (a) 27,875 shares (the “Preferred Shares”) of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, and (b) a ten-year warrant (the “Warrants”) to purchase up to 250,825 shares of voting common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), at an exercise price of $16.67 per share.

 

118


Table of Contents

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

 

On September 30, 2009, the Company repurchased all of the outstanding Preferred Shares issued pursuant to TARP for $28,875 plus accrued dividends. In October 2009, the Company purchased all remaining outstanding Warrants issued pursuant to TARP for $212.

 

(29) Subsequent event (Unaudited)

On January 20, 2011 the Company completed its previously announced transaction as described in the Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated as of August 8, 2010 by and among CenterState, Carolina First Bank and, to the extent provided therein, The South Financial Group, Inc. and TD Bank, National Association (the “P&A Agreement).

Pursuant to the P&A Agreement, CenterState acquired approximately $114,000 of deposits, two branch offices and assumed the leases on an additional two branch offices within Putnam County, Florida. CenterState did not pay a premium for the deposits and purchased the two owned branches for approximately $700. In addition, CenterState purchased approximately $121,400 of performing loans previously selected by CenterState and located within CenterState’s fourteen County market areas within central Florida. CenterState purchased the performing loans for 90% of their face value amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. During the two year period following the closing of this transaction, CenterState may put back to TD Bank N.A. (“TD”) any acquired loan that (1) becomes more than 30 days delinquent or (2) becomes classified as “nonaccrual,” “substandard,” “doubtful,” or “loss” in accordance with applicable regulatory standards for loss classification.

 

119


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this report to be duly signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Davenport, State of Florida, on the 16th day of March, 2011.

 

CENTERSTATE BANKS, INC.
/S/    ERNEST S. PINNER        
Ernest S. Pinner
Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer
/S/    JAMES J. ANTAL        
James J. Antal

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on March 16, 2011.

 

Signature

  

Title

/S/    ERNEST S. PINNER        

Ernest S. Pinner

  

Chairman of the Board

President and Chief Executive Officer

/S/    JAMES H. BINGHAM        

James H. Bingham

   Director

/S/    G. ROBERT BLANCHARD, JR.        

G. Robert Blanchard, Jr.

   Director

/S/    C. DENNIS CARLTON        

C. Dennis Carlton

   Director

/S/    JOHN C. CORBETT        

John C. Corbett

   Director

/S/    GAIL E. GREGG-STRIMENOS        

Gail E. Gregg-Strimenos

   Director

/S/    BRYAN W. JUDGE        

Bryan W. Judge

   Director

/S/    SAMUEL L. LUPFER, IV        

Samuel L. Lupfer, IV

   Director

/S/    RULON D. MUNNS        

Rulon D. Munns

   Director

/S/    G. TIERSO NUNEZ II        

G. Tierso Nunez II

   Director

/S/    THOMAS E. OAKLEY        

Thomas E. Oakley

   Director

/S/    J. THOMAS ROCKER        

J. Thomas Rocker

   Director

 

120


Table of Contents

CenterState Banks, Inc.

Form 10-K

For Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2010

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.

      

Exhibit

10.8   -    Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement (“SERP”) between the Company and Stephen D. Young, its Treasurer and Executive Vice President of the Company’s lead subsidiary bank, CenterState Bank of Florida, N.A.
10.9   -    Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement (“SERP”) between the Company and Rodney A. Anthony, its Chief Operations Officer and Executive Vice President of the Company’s lead subsidiary bank, CenterState Bank of Florida, N.A.
10.10   -    Employment Agreement between the Company and Stephen D. Young, its Treasurer and Executive Vice President of the Company’s lead subsidiary bank, CenterState Bank of Florida, N.A.
10.11   -    Employment Agreement between the Company and Rodney A. Anthony, its Chief Operations Officer and Executive Vice President of the Company’s lead subsidiary bank, CenterState Bank of Florida, N.A.
21.1      Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1      Consent of Crowe Horwath LLP
31.1      Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2      Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1      Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2      Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

121