Attached files

file filename
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - KMG CHEMICALS INCc13983exv32w2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - KMG CHEMICALS INCc13983exv31w1.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - KMG CHEMICALS INCc13983exv32w1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - KMG CHEMICALS INCc13983exv31w2.htm
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended January 31, 2011
or
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     .
Commission file number: 000-29278
KMG CHEMICALS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Texas   75-2640529
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
9555 West Sam Houston Parkway South, Suite 600    
Houston, Texas   77099
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
(713) 600-3800
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer þ   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of March 10, 2011, there were 11,313,991 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.
 
 

 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
       
 
       
       
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    15  
 
       
    20  
 
       
    21  
 
       
       
 
       
    21  
 
       
    22  
 
       
    22  
 
       
    22  
 
       
    22  
 
       
    22  
 
       
    22  
 
       
    23  
 
       
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32.1
 Exhibit 32.2

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
KMG CHEMICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands except for share and per share data)
                 
    January 31,     July 31,  
    2011     2010  
    (Unaudited)          
ASSETS
               
CURRENT ASSETS:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 4,456     $ 4,728  
Accounts receivable:
               
Trade, net of allowances of $260 at January 31, 2011 and at July 31, 2010
    30,240       30,214  
Other
    3,366       2,864  
Inventories, net
    39,896       39,102  
Current deferred tax assets
    798       672  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    718       1,882  
 
           
Total current assets
    79,474       79,462  
 
               
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net
    69,980       68,645  
 
               
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS
    873       606  
GOODWILL
    3,778       3,778  
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net
    19,948       20,534  
RESTRICTED CASH
          189  
OTHER ASSETS, net
    3,010       2,807  
 
           
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 177,063     $ 176,021  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 22,653     $ 20,899  
Accrued liabilities
    5,102       7,147  
Current deferred tax liabilities
    28       28  
Current portion of long-term debt
    8,000       8,000  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    35,783       36,074  
 
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current portion
    44,333       51,333  
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES
    3,497       2,644  
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
    1,239       1,192  
 
           
Total liabilities
    84,852       91,243  
 
               
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
               
 
               
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
           
Common stock, $.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized, 11,309,336 shares issued and outstanding at January 31, 2011 and 11,229,487 shares issued and outstanding at July 31, 2010
    113       112  
Additional paid-in capital
    25,081       24,319  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (2,154 )     (3,335 )
Retained earnings
    69,171       63,682  
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    92,211       84,778  
 
           
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 177,063     $ 176,021  
 
           
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

KMG CHEMICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands except for per share data)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    January 31,     January 31,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
 
                               
NET SALES
  $ 64,936     $ 45,134     $ 127,040     $ 94,548  
 
                               
COST OF SALES
    46,670       28,422       91,406       59,445  
 
                       
 
                               
Gross Profit
    18,266       16,712       35,634       35,103  
 
                       
 
                               
DISTRIBUTION EXPENSES
    7,351       4,356       13,723       9,377  
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
    6,109       5,432       11,545       10,852  
 
                       
 
                               
Operating income
    4,806       6,924       10,366       14,874  
 
                       
 
                               
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
                               
Interest income
          1       1       2  
Interest expense
    (599 )     (535 )     (1,194 )     (1,092 )
Other, net
    (241 )     (71 )     (190 )     (99 )
 
                       
 
                               
Total other expense, net
    (840 )     (605 )     (1,383 )     (1,189 )
 
                       
 
                               
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
    3,966       6,319       8,983       13,685  
 
                       
 
                               
Provision for income taxes
    (1,506 )     (2,356 )     (3,007 )     (5,102 )
 
                       
 
                               
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
    2,460       3,963       5,976       8,583  
 
                       
 
                               
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
                               
Loss from discontinued operations, before income taxes
    (47 )           (47 )      
Income tax benefit
    11             11        
 
                       
Loss from discontinued operations
    (36 )           (36 )      
 
                       
 
                               
NET INCOME
  $ 2,424     $ 3,963     $ 5,940     $ 8,583  
 
                       
 
                               
EARNINGS PER SHARE:
                               
Basic
                               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 0.21     $ 0.36     $ 0.53     $ 0.77  
Loss from discontinued operations
                       
 
                       
Net income
  $ 0.21     $ 0.36     $ 0.53     $ 0.77  
 
                       
Diluted
                               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 0.21     $ 0.35     $ 0.52     $ 0.75  
Loss from discontinued operations
                       
 
                       
Net income
  $ 0.21     $ 0.35     $ 0.52     $ 0.75  
 
                       
 
                               
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
                               
Basic
    11,308       11,162       11,303       11,153  
Diluted
    11,495       11,420       11,477       11,397  
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

KMG CHEMICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    January 31,  
    2011     2010  
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
               
Net income
  $ 5,940     $ 8,583  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    3,846       2,817  
Amortization of loan costs included in interest expense
    54       44  
Stock-based compensation expense
    374       212  
Bad debt expense
          171  
Inventory valuation adjustment
    30       (59 )
Loss on disposal of property
    113        
Deferred income tax expense
    442       589  
Tax benefit from stock-based awards
    (196 )     (81 )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
               
Accounts receivable — trade
    247       (584 )
Accounts receivable — other
    (434 )     (236 )
Inventories
    (632 )     (2,030 )
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    939       1,015  
Accounts payable
    1,641       (2,277 )
Accrued liabilities
    (1,933 )     (2,948 )
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    10,431       5,216  
 
           
 
               
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
Additions to property, plant and equipment
    (4,009 )     (500 )
Proceeds from sale of property
    59        
Change in restricted cash
    189       110  
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (3,761 )     (390 )
 
           
 
               
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
Payments under revolver credit agreement
    (3,000 )      
Principal payments on borrowings on term loan
    (4,000 )     (2,958 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    200       138  
Tax benefit from stock-based awards
    196       81  
Payment of dividends
    (452 )     (445 )
 
           
Net cash used in financing activities
    (7,056 )     (3,184 )
 
           
 
               
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH
    114       (62 )
 
               
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    (272 )     1,580  
 
               
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
    4,728       7,174  
 
           
 
               
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
  $ 4,456     $ 8,754  
 
           
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 1,188     $ 1,060  
Cash paid for income taxes
  $ 2,479     $ 7,183  
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(1) Basis of Presentation. The (a) consolidated balance sheet as of July 31, 2010, which has been derived from audited consolidated financial statements, and (b) the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim reporting. As permitted under those requirements, certain footnotes or other financial information that are normally required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. The Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading and in the opinion of management reflect all adjustments, including those of a normal recurring nature, that are necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results of operations to be expected for the full year. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010.
These condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared using certain estimates by management and include the accounts of KMG Chemicals, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company changed its estimate of the useful lives of certain equipment purchased in the General Chemical acquisition. This change had the effect of decreasing depreciation expense by $411,000, and the effect of increasing income from continuing operations by $411,000, increasing net income by $255,000 and increasing basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.02 for each of the three and six month periods ended January 31, 2011.
(2) Acquisition. On March 29, 2010, the Company acquired certain assets of the electronic chemicals business of General Chemical Performance Products, LLC (“General Chemical”). The acquired business included products similar to the products of the Company’s then existing electronic chemicals business. The purpose of the acquisition was to expand the Company’s manufacturing capability and increase market share.
The purchase included inventory, a 48,000 square foot manufacturing facility in Hollister, California and certain equipment at General Chemical’s Bay Point, California facility. The Company additionally entered into a manufacturing agreement with General Chemical under which they will continue to manufacture certain acid products at their Bay Point facility, using the equipment at the facility which was purchased by the Company. The Company paid $26.8 million in cash for the acquisition which was financed with available cash and borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility.
The following table summarizes the consideration paid for the acquired assets and the acquisition accounting for the fair value of the assets recognized in the consolidated balance sheets at the acquisition date (in thousands):
         
Consideration:
       
Cash
  $ 26,784  
 
     
Fair value of identifiable assets acquired:
       
Inventory, net of allowance
  $ 7,604  
Property, plant and equipment
    17,706  
Intangible assets:
       
Value of product qualifications
    1,300  
Non-compete agreement
    150  
 
     
Total intangible assets
    1,450  
 
     
 
     
 
       
Other
    24  
Total identifiable assets acquired
  $ 26,784  
 
     
The following table sets forth pro forma results for the three and six months ended January 31, 2010 had the acquisition occurred as of the beginning of fiscal year 2009. The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of what our consolidated results of operations would have been had we completed the acquisition as of the date indicated.
                 
    Three months ended     Six months ended  
    January 31, 2010     January 31, 2010  
    (Unaudited)  
    (in thousands, except per share data)  
Revenues
  $ 55,374     $ 115,571  
Operating income
    7,601       16,103  
Net income
    4,364       9,298  
Earnings per share — basic
  $ 0.39     $ 0.83  

 

6


Table of Contents

The Company is consolidating manufacturing for its U.S.-based electronic chemicals at its Pueblo, CO and Hollister, CA facilities. As a result it is not practicable to determine the revenue and earnings attributable to the acquired business included in the Company’s consolidated statements of income for the reporting period.
Depreciation included in the pro forma financial information is approximately $230,000 per month.
(3) Recent Accounting Standards. The Company has considered all recently issued accounting standards updates and SEC rules and interpretive releases, and believes that only the following item could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new accounting guidance for the disclosure of supplementary pro forma information for business combinations. The guidance clarifies the acquisition date that should be used for reporting the pro forma financial information disclosures when comparative financial statements are presented and specifies that the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The guidance also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosure requirements to include a description of the nature and amount of material, non recurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma information. The new guidance is effective prospectively for business combinations with an acquisition date on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the new guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
(4) Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share have been computed by dividing net income by the weighted average shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share have been computed by dividing net income by the weighted average shares outstanding plus potentially dilutive common shares. The following table presents information necessary to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share for periods indicated:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    January 31,     January 31,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
    (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)  
 
                               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 2,460     $ 3,963     $ 5,976     $ 8,583  
Loss from discontinued operations
    (36 )           (36 )      
 
                       
Net income
  $ 2,424     $ 3,963     $ 5,940     $ 8,583  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic
    11,308       11,162       11,303       11,153  
Dilutive effect of options and stock awards
    187       258       174       244  
 
                       
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted
    11,495       11,420       11,477       11,397  
 
                       
 
                               
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
                               
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations
  $ 0.21     $ 0.36     $ 0.53     $ 0.77  
Basic earnings per share on loss from discontinued operations
                       
 
                       
Basic earnings per share
  $ 0.21     $ 0.36     $ 0.53     $ 0.77  
 
                       
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                               
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
  $ 0.21     $ 0.35     $ 0.52     $ 0.75  
Diluted earnings per share on loss from discontinued operations
                       
 
                       
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 0.21     $ 0.35     $ 0.52     $ 0.75  
 
                       
Outstanding stock based awards are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share under the treasury stock method, if including them would be anti-dilutive. There were approximately 1,500 shares and less than 1,000 shares of potentially dilutive securities not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for three and six month periods ended January 31, 2011, respectively. There were no potentially dilutive securities not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the periods ended January 31, 2010.

 

7


Table of Contents

(5) Inventories. Inventories are summarized in the following table (in thousands):
                 
    January 31,     July 31,  
    2011     2010  
Raw materials and supplies
  $ 9,947     $ 8,578  
Finished products
    30,332       30,942  
Less reserve for inventory obsolescence
    (383 )     (418 )
 
           
Inventories, net
  $ 39,896     $ 39,102  
 
           
(6) Property, Plant and Equipment. Property, plant and equipment and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are summarized as follows (in thousands):
                 
    January 31,     July 31,  
    2011     2010  
Land
  $ 9,780     $ 9,428  
Buildings & improvements
    34,851       34,399  
Equipment
    41,138       40,195  
Leasehold improvements
    132       132  
 
           
 
    85,901       84,154  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (21,252 )     (18,054 )
 
           
 
    64,649       66,100  
Construction-in-progress
    5,331       2,545  
 
           
Property, plant and equipment, net
  $ 69,980     $ 68,645  
 
           
(7) Stock-Based Compensation. The Company has stock-based incentive plans which are described in more detail in note 11 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2010. The Company recognized stock-based compensation costs of approximately $193,000 and $126,000, respectively, for the three months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010, and approximately $374,000 and $212,000 for the six months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which are recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income.
As of January 31, 2011, the unrecognized compensation costs related to stock-based awards was approximately $1.6 million, including $28,000 related to non-vested stock options expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years and $1.6 million related to unvested performance and time-based stock awards expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years.
A summary of stock option and stock activity is presented below.
Stock Options
A summary of activity associated with the six months ended January 31, 2011 is presented below.
                 
            Weighted-  
            Average  
    Shares     Exercise Price  
 
               
Outstanding on August 1, 2010
    272,000     $ 3.98  
Granted
           
Exercised
    (50,000 )     4.00  
Forfeited/Expired
           
 
             
Outstanding on January 31, 2011
    222,000       3.98  
 
             

 

8


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at January 31, 2011 based on fully vested (currently exercisable) stock option awards and stock options awards expected to vest:
                                 
                    Weighted-        
            Weighted-     Average        
            Average     Remaining     Aggregate  
    Options     Exercise Price     Contractual     Intrinsic Value  
    Outstanding     per Share     Term (years)     (in thousands) (1)  
Fully vested and currently exercisable
    159,500     $ 3.84       5.4     $ 2,104  
Expected to vest
    62,500       4.34       11.6       793  
 
                           
Total outstanding stock options
    222,000       3.98       7.1     $ 2,897  
 
                           
 
     
(1)   The aggregate intrinsic value is computed based on the closing price of the Company’s stock on January 31, 2011.
No options were granted in the first six months of fiscal years 2011 or 2010.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $546,000 and $282,000, respectively.
Performance Shares
On August 1, 2010, there were 197,249 non-vested performance shares outstanding which reflected the maximum number of shares under the awards. During the six months ended January 31, 2011, there were no awards vested and there were 103,298 performance-based stock awards granted. The fair value of the award was measured on the grant date of December 7, 2010 using the Company’s closing stock price of $15.65. Stock-based compensation expense on the award will be recognized on a straight line basis over the requisite service period beginning on the date of grant through the end of the measurement period ending July 31, 2013, based on the number of shares expected to vest at the end of the measurement period. As of January 31, 2011, the non-vested performance-based stock awards consisted of Series 1 and Series 2 awards granted to certain executives in fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, are summarized below.
                                                 
                    Closing Stock                    
            Maximum     Price     3-Year     Expected        
    Series     Award     (Fair Value)     Measurement     Percentage of     Shares Expected  
Date of Grant   Award     (Shares)     on Grant Date     Period Ending     Vesting     to Vest  
Fiscal Year 2011 Award
12/7/2010
  Series 1     61,980     $ 15.65       07/31/2013       36.25 %     22,468  
12/7/2010
  Series 2     41,318     $ 15.65       07/31/2013       0.00 %      
 
                                           
 
            103,298                               22,468  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Fiscal Year 2010 Award
3/17/2010
  Series 1     63,605     $ 15.55       07/31/2012       47.50 %     30,212  
3/17/2010
  Series 2     42,402     $ 15.55       07/31/2012       100.00 %     42,402  
 
                                           
 
            106,007                               72,614  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Fiscal Year 2009 Award
12/02/2008
  Series 1     54,745     $ 3.19       07/31/2011       52.50 %     28,741  
12/02/2008
  Series 2     36,497     $ 3.19       07/31/2011       20.00 %     7,299  
 
                                           
 
            91,242                               36,040  
 
                                           
Total
            300,547                               131,122  
 
                                           
Series 1: Vesting for the Series 1 awards are subject to a performance requirement composed of certain revenue growth objectives and average annual return on invested capital or equity objectives measured across a three year period. These objectives are measured quarterly using the Company’s budget, actual results and long term projections. For the fiscal year 2011, 2010 and 2009 awards the expected percentage of vesting is based on performance through January 31, 2011 and reflects the percentage of shares projected to vest for the respective awards at the end of their measurement periods.
Series 2: Vesting for the Series 2 awards are subject to performance requirements pertaining to the growth rate in the Company’s basic earnings per share over a three year period. The achievement of performance requirements is measured quarterly using the Company’s budget, actual results and long-term projections. For the fiscal year 2011, 2010 and 2009 awards the expected percentage of vesting is based on performance through January 31, 2011 and reflects the percentage of shares projected to vest for the respective awards at the end of their measurement periods.

 

9


Table of Contents

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of performance awards outstanding at August 1, 2010 and January 31, 2011 was $12.33 and $12.17, respectively.
Time Based Shares
A summary of activity for time-based stock awards for the six months ended January 31, 2011 is presented below:
                 
            Weighted-Average  
            Grant-Date  
    Shares     Fair Value  
Non-vested on August 1, 2010
    24,070     $ 12.66  
Granted
    25,977       16.95  
Vested (1)
    (10,631 )     13.42  
Forfeited
           
 
             
Non-vested on January 31, 2011
    39,416       14.46  
 
             
 
     
(1)   During the six month period ended January 31, 2011 there were 12,698 shares vested. The number of shares presented here includes an adjustment of 2,067 shares which do not represent shares that vested during the six months ended January 31, 2011. The adjustment was related to the fiscal year 2010 non-employee director stock grant and reflects the difference between the number of shares reported as granted and the number of shares vested over the twelve month service period of the award ended November 30, 2010. The number of shares granted was calculated based on the aggregate monetary value of the award divided by the Company’s closing stock price on the respective date of grant. The number of shares vested at the end of each of the three month service periods over the twelve month service period ending November 30, 2010 was based on the Company’s closing stock price at the end of each of the three month periods.
During the six months ended January 31, 2011, a grant was made to non-employee directors under time-based awards whereby each non-employee director will be issued shares having a value of $50,000 for service as a director for the twelve-month period ending November 30, 2011. Each non-employee director shall be issued shares in quarterly installments for service as a director in the preceding three months in an amount equal in value to $12,500 valued on the closing price of the Company’s stock price as of the last trading day of each three month service period ending in February, May, August and November. The aggregate grant-date fair value of $350,000 for the award will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period beginning January 24, 2011.
The Company also granted 5,769 time-based shares to certain employees during the six months ended January 31, 2011 which vest on July 31, 2013. The fair value of the award of $90,285 was measured on the date of grant on December 7, 2010, using the Company’s closing stock price of $15.65, and will be recognized on a straight line basis over the requisite service period from December 7, 2010 through July 31, 2013.
The total fair value of shares vested during the six months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $175,000 and $99,000, respectively.
There were 21,944 time-based shares granted during the six months ended January 31, 2010.

 

10


Table of Contents

(8) Intangible Assets. Intangible assets are summarized as follows (in thousands):
                         
    January 31, 2011  
    Original     Accumulated     Carrying  
    Cost     Amortization     Amount  
Intangible assets subject to amortization: (range of useful life):
                       
Creosote supply contract (10 years)
  $ 4,000     $ (3,822 )   $ 178  
Animal health trademarks (4-5 years)
    364       (363 )     1  
Animal health product registrations and other related assets (5-20 years)
    6,165       (1,837 )     4,328  
Electronic chemicals-related contracts (3-8 years)
    1,164       (995 )     169  
Electronic chemicals-related trademarks and patents (10-15 years)
    117       (32 )     85  
Electronic chemicals—value of product qualifications (5 years)
    1,300       (217 )     1,083  
 
                 
Total intangible assets subject to amortization
  $ 13,110     $ (7,266 )     5,844  
 
                 
 
                       
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
                       
Creosote product registrations
                    5,339  
Penta product registrations
                    8,765  
 
                     
Total intangible assets not subject to amortization
                    14,104  
 
                     
Total intangible assets, net
                  $ 19,948  
 
                     
                         
    July 31, 2010  
    Original     Accumulated     Carrying  
    Cost     Amortization     Amount  
Intangible assets subject to amortization: (range of useful life):
                       
Creosote supply contract (10 years)
  $ 4,000     $ (3,689 )   $ 311  
Animal health trademarks (4-5 years)
    364       (359 )     5  
Animal health product registrations and other related assets (5-20 years)
    6,165       (1,667 )     4,498  
Electronic chemicals-related contracts (3-8 years)
    1,164       (844 )     320  
Electronic chemicals-related trademarks and patents (10-15 years)
    117       (26 )     91  
Electronic chemicals-value of product qualifications (5 years)
    1,300       (95 )     1,205  
 
                 
Total intangible assets subject to amortization
  $ 13,110     $ (6,680 )     6,430  
 
                 
 
                       
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
                       
Creosote product registrations
                    5,339  
Penta product registrations
                    8,765  
 
                     
Total intangible assets not subject to amortization
                    14,104  
 
                     
Total intangible assets, net
                  $ 20,534  
 
                     
Intangible assets subject to amortization are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Amortization expense was approximately $282,000 and $244,000 for the three month periods ended January 31, 2011 and 2010 respectively, and was approximately $586,000 and $487,000 for the first six months of fiscal years 2010 and 2011, respectively.
(9) Dividends. Dividends of approximately $226,000 ($0.02 per share) and $223,000 ($0.02 per share) were declared and paid in the second quarter of fiscal years 2011 and 2010, respectively. Dividends of approximately $452,000 ($0.04 per share) and $445,000 ($0.04 per share) were declared and paid in the first six months of fiscal years 2011 and 2010, respectively.
(10) Comprehensive Income. The Company’s other comprehensive income includes foreign currency translation gains and losses which are recognized as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated balance sheets. The following table summarizes total comprehensive income for the periods indicated (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    January 31,     January 31,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Net income
  $ 2,424     $ 3,963     $ 5,940     $ 8,583  
Other comprehensive income:
                               
Net foreign currency translation gain (loss)
    (297 )     (1,372 )     1,181       (346 )
 
                       
Total comprehensive income
  $ 2,127     $ 2,591     $ 7,121     $ 8,237  
 
                       

 

11


Table of Contents

(11) Segment Information. The Company operates four reportable segments organized around its three product lines: electronic chemicals, industrial wood treating chemicals and animal health products.
The Company previously had five reportable segments, Electronic Chemicals — North America, Electronic Chemicals — International, penta, creosote and animal health. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010 the Company re-evaluated the criteria used to determine operating segments, and concluded that its electronic chemicals product line met the criteria of a single operating segment. As a result, the composition of the Company’s reportable segments was revised to reflect a change from five to four reportable segments, electronic chemicals, penta, creosote and animal health. Prior year information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    January 31,     January 31,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
    (Amounts in thousands)  
Sales
                               
Electronic Chemicals
  $ 36,001     $ 22,894     $ 72,794     $ 45,905  
Penta
    5,275       5,107       11,746       11,050  
Creosote
    20,532       14,670       38,221       34,197  
Animal Health
    3,128       2,463       4,279       3,396  
 
                       
Total sales for reportable segments
  $ 64,936     $ 45,134     $ 127,040     $ 94,548  
 
                       
 
                               
Depreciation and amortization
                               
Electronic Chemicals
  $ 1,117     $ 958     $ 2,873     $ 1,854  
Penta
    147       154       292       309  
Creosote
    73       69       146       139  
Animal Health
    193       191       385       383  
Other — general corporate
    76       66       150       132  
 
                       
Total consolidated depreciation and amortization
  $ 1,606     $ 1,438     $ 3,846     $ 2,817  
 
                       
 
                               
Segment income (loss) from operations (1)
                               
Electronic Chemicals
  $ 1,331     $ 2,499     $ 4,356     $ 3,401  
Penta
    1,568       1,446       3,629       3,821  
Creosote
    2,804       4,070       4,572       10,390  
Animal Health
    144       87       (253 )     (283 )
 
                       
Total segment income from operations
  $ 5,847     $ 8,102     $ 12,304     $ 17,329  
 
                       
                 
    January 31,     July 31,  
    2011     2010  
Assets
               
Electronic Chemicals
  $ 112,455     $ 109,367  
Penta
    22,968       20,094  
Creosote
    16,053       21,731  
Animal Health
    15,483       15,950  
 
           
Total assets for reportable segments
  $ 166,959     $ 167,142  
 
           
 
     
(1)   Segment income (loss) from operations includes certain allocated corporate overhead expenses. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company changed the method it uses to allocate those costs to its reportable segments which is based on segment net sales. As a result prior year amounts have been reclassified to reflect the current year method. Corporate overhead expenses allocated to segment income (loss) for the three and six months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    January 31,     January 31,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
    (Amounts in thousands)  
 
                               
Electronic Chemicals
  $ 952     $ 884     $ 1,884     $ 1,788  
Penta
    218       180       387       364  
Creosote
    622       498       1,188       1,008  
Animal Health
    137       84       249       170  
 
                       
Total corporate overhead expense allocation
  $ 1,929     $ 1,646     $ 3,708     $ 3,330  
 
                       

 

12


Table of Contents

A reconciliation of total segment information to consolidated amounts is as follows:
                 
    January 31,     July 31,  
    2011     2010  
    (Amounts in thousands)  
Assets:
               
Total assets for reportable segments
  $ 166,959     $ 167,142  
Total assets for discontinued operations (1)
    689       739  
Cash and cash equivalents
    4,299       3,073  
Prepaid and other current assets
    2,000       2,174  
Other
    3,116       2,893  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 177,063     $ 176,021  
 
           
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    January 31,     January 31,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Sales:
                               
Total sales for reportable segments
  $ 64,936     $ 45,134     $ 127,040     $ 94,548  
 
                       
Net sales
  $ 64,936     $ 45,134     $ 127,040     $ 94,548  
 
                       
 
                               
Segment income from operations:
                               
Total segment income from operations (2)
  $ 5,847     $ 8,102     $ 12,304     $ 17,329  
Other corporate expense (2)
    (1,041 )     (1,178 )     (1,938 )     (2,455 )
 
                       
Operating income
    4,806       6,924       10,366       14,874  
Interest income
          1       1       2  
Interest expense
    (599 )     (535 )     (1,194 )     (1,092 )
Other income (expense), net
    (241 )     (71 )     (190 )     (99 )
 
                       
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
  $ 3,966     $ 6,319     $ 8,983     $ 13,685  
 
                       
 
     
(1)   Reflects long-term deferred tax assets related to discontinued operations as of January 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010.
 
(2)   Other corporate expense represents those expenses associated with the company’s operation as a public entity and includes costs such as board compensation, audit expense and fees related to the listing of our stock. During the first six months of fiscal year 2011, the Company changed the method it uses to allocate certain corporate overhead costs to its reportable segments, and accordingly prior year amounts have been reclassified to reflect the current year method.
(12) Long-Term Obligations. The Company’s debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
                 
    January 31,     July 31,  
    2011     2010  
Senior Secured Debt:
               
Note Purchase Agreement, maturing on December 31, 2014, interest rate of 7.43%
  $ 20,000     $ 20,000  
Secured Debt:
               
Term Loan Facility, maturing on December 31, 2012, variable interest rates based on LIBOR plus 2.00% (2.26% at January 31, 2011)
    15,333       19,333  
Revolving Loan Facility, maturing on December 31, 2012, variable interest rates based on LIBOR plus 2.00% (2.26% at January 31, 2011)
    17,000       20,000  
 
           
Total debt
    52,333       59,333  
Current portion of long-term debt
    (8,000 )     (8,000 )
 
           
Long-term debt, net of current portion
  $ 44,333     $ 51,333  
 
           

 

13


Table of Contents

To finance the acquisition of the electronic chemicals business in December 2007, the Company entered into a credit agreement and a note purchase agreement. The credit facility included a revolving loan facility of $35.0 million and a term loan facility of $35.0 million. The Company amended those facilities in March 2010 to increase the amount that may be borrowed under the revolving loan facility to $50 million. The facility was entered into with Wachovia Bank, National Association, a subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Co., Bank of America, N.A., The Prudential Insurance Company of America, and Pruco Life Insurance Company. Advances under the revolving loan and the term loan mature December 31, 2012. The revolving loan and the term loan each bear interest at varying rate of LIBOR plus a margin based on our funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”).
         
Ratio of Funded Debt to EBITDA   Margin  
Equal to or greater than 3.0 to 1.0
    2.75 %
Equal to or greater than 2.5 to 1.0, but less than 3.0 to 1.0
    2.50 %
Equal to or greater than 2.0 to 1.0, but less than 2.5 to 1.0
    2.25 %
Equal to or greater than 1.5 to 1.0, but less than 2.0 to 1.0
    2.00 %
Less than 1.5 to 1.0
    1.75 %
As of February 28, 2011, advances under the revolving loan and the term loan bear interest at 2.26% per year (LIBOR plus 2.00%). For the first 24 months of the term facility, principal payments were $458,333, per month and then beginning January 2010 principal payments became $666,667 per month for the balance of the term prior to maturity.
The purchase of the electronic chemicals assets from General Chemical on March 29, 2010 was funded with available cash and borrowings under the revolving loan. At January 31, 2011, the amount outstanding on the revolving loan was $17.0 million and the amount outstanding on the term loan was $15.3 million.
In fiscal year 2008 the Company also entered into a $20.0 million note purchase agreement with the Prudential Insurance Company of America. Advances under the note purchase agreement mature December 31, 2014, and bear interest at 7.43% per annum. Principal is payable at maturity. At January 31, 2011, $20.0 million was outstanding under the note purchase agreement.
Loans under the amended and restated credit facility and the note purchase agreement are secured by the Company’s assets, including inventory, accounts receivable, equipment, intangible assets, and real property. The credit facility and the note purchase agreement have restrictive covenants, including that the Company must maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.5 to 1.0, and maintain a ratio of funded debt to EBITDA of 3.0 to 1.0. The Company is also obligated to maintain a debt to capitalization ratio of not more than 50%. For purposes of calculating these financial covenant ratios, we use a pro forma EBITDA. On January 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants.
(13) Income Taxes. Income tax expense for the interim periods was computed using the effective tax rate estimated to be applicable for the full fiscal year. The effective tax rate for first six months of fiscal year 2011 was 33.5%, which included the effect of an adjustment recognized during the first quarter of $410,000 for the reversal of a portion of the valuation allowance related to a foreign subsidiary.
(14) Discontinued Operations. In fiscal year 2008 the Company discontinued operations of its herbicide product line that had comprised the agricultural chemical segment. During the three and six months ended January 31, 2011, there were no sales reported in discontinued operations, and the Company reported a net loss from discontinued operations of $36,000 from the dismantling of related equipment which began in the second quarter. No amounts were recorded for the three and six months ended January 31, 2010.

 

14


Table of Contents

ITEM 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We manufacture, formulate and distribute specialty chemicals globally. We operate businesses engaged in electronic chemicals, industrial wood treating chemicals and animal health products. Our electronic chemicals are used in the manufacturing of semiconductors. Our wood preserving chemicals, pentachlorophenol (“penta”) and creosote, are used by our industrial customers primarily to extend the useful life of utility poles and railroad crossties. Our animal health products include biotech feed additives, farm and ranch hygiene products and pesticide products used on cattle, other livestock and poultry to protect the animals from flies and other pests.
Results of Operations
Three Month and Six Month Periods Ended January 31, 2011 compared with Three and Six Month Periods Ended January 31, 2010
Segment Data
Segment data is presented for our four reportable segments for the three and six month periods ended January 31, 2011 and 2010. The segment data should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. We previously had five reportable segments, Electronic Chemicals-North America, Electronic Chemicals-International, and segments for penta, creosote and animal health. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010 we re-evaluated the criteria used to determine operating segments, and we concluded that our electronic chemicals product line met the criteria of a single operating segment. As a result our reportable segments were revised to reflect a change from five to four reportable segments, electronic chemicals, penta, creosote and animal health. Prior year information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    January 31,     January 31,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
    (Amounts in thousands)  
Sales
                               
Electronic Chemicals
  $ 36,001     $ 22,894     $ 72,794     $ 45,905  
Penta
    5,275       5,107       11,746       11,050  
Creosote
    20,532       14,670       38,221       34,197  
Animal Health
    3,128       2,463       4,279       3,396  
 
                       
Net sales
  $ 64,936     $ 45,134     $ 127,040     $ 94,548  
 
                       
Net Sales
Net sales increased $19.8 million, or 43.9%, to $64.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 as compared with $45.1 million for the same period of the prior year. For the six month comparison, net sales increased $32.5 million, or 34.4%, to $127.0 million in fiscal year 2011 from $94.5 million in fiscal year 2010.
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, the electronic chemicals segment had net sales of $36.0 million, an increase of $13.1 million, or 57.3%, as compared to $22.9 million for the prior year period. For the six month comparison, net sales in the electronic chemicals segment increased $26.9 million, or 58.6%, to $72.8 million in fiscal year 2011 from $45.9 million in fiscal year 2010. We had increased sales from our March 2010 acquisition of General Chemical’s electronic chemicals business, and demand recovered in the segment from the effect of the economic downturn in the semiconductor industry.
Net sales of penta products increased $168,000, or 3.3%, to $5.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 as compared to $5.1 million for the prior year period. For the six month comparison, net sales in the penta segment increased $696,000, or 6.3%, to $11.7 million in fiscal year 2011 from $11.1 million in fiscal year 2010. The increases in sales for both the three and six month periods were due to higher volume. We benefited from an incremental improvement in purchases of treated poles by utility companies.
Creosote net sales also increased in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, as compared with the prior year period, by $5.9 million, or 40.0%, to $20.5 million. For the six month comparison, net sales in the creosote segment increased $4.0 million, or 11.8%, to $38.2 million in fiscal year 2011 from $34.2 million in fiscal year 2010. For the three and six month periods the increase was due to higher volumes offset in part by lower average prices. Demand by railroads for crossties treated with creosote eased in 2010 from the high levels of previous years, but now appears to be rebounding as the United States comes out of the recession. Crosstie purchases appear to be moving back toward about 18 million ties for the United States market. However, average pricing for creosote for both the quarter and the six month period declined because of a shift in product mix and renegotiated pricing following consolidation of our wood treating customer base. We anticipate that pricing will remain relatively flat through fiscal year 2011, but we believe that creosote sales volume will increase in the second half of the fiscal year as rail tie production rates more closely approximate tie purchases.

 

15


Table of Contents

Net sales of animal health pesticides increased by $665,000, or 27.0%, to $3.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 as compared with $2.5 million in the prior year period. For the six month comparison, net sales in the animal health segment increased $883,000, or 26.0%, to $4.3 million in fiscal year 2011 from $3.4 million in fiscal year 2010. The increase was primarily driven by improvement in demand for pest control in the United States in the feed animal sector. However, we have seen a significant increase in orders for ear tag products in Australia, and because we are continuing to add registered products in South America, we see increased animal health sales in that region. Although we are working to have EPA re-establish appropriate tolerances, pending a successful conclusion of that effort, sales of our Rabon products in the U.S. may be adversely affected. Sales of our Rabon products in the U.S. constituted approximately 2% of our fiscal year 2010 consolidated net sales. Seasonal usage of animal health pesticides is dependent on varying seasonal patterns, weather conditions and weather-related pressure from pests, as well as customer marketing programs and requirements. Our revenue from the animal health pesticides segment is seasonal and weighted to the third and fourth quarters of our fiscal year. Revenues from products subject to significant seasonal variations represented 5.0% of our fiscal year 2010 revenues.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased by $1.6 million, or 9.3%, to $18.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 from $16.7 million in the same quarter the prior year. For the six month comparison, gross profit increased $531,000, or 1.5%, to $35.6 million in fiscal year 2011 from $35.1 million in fiscal year 2010. Gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased to 28.1% in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 from 37.0% in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, and decreased to 28.0% for the first six months of fiscal year 2011 from 37.1% for the prior fiscal year.
The increase in aggregate gross profit for both the three and six month periods came from improved sales in our electronic chemicals segment, as discussed above. As a percentage of sales, however, profit margins in our electronic chemicals segment was down for the second quarter and for the full six months of fiscal year 2011 as compared to the prior year. In our electronic chemicals segment margins were impacted in both the second quarter and the six months period by duplicative costs associated with the integration of our March 2010 acquisition of General Chemicals’ business, and by rising raw material costs. In connection with the integration, we are shifting operations to our Hollister, CA and Pueblo, CO facilities, but we have continued to incur expense for contract manufacturing in Dallas, TX and Bay Point, CA. We expect that duplication will be eliminated by the end of the fiscal year as we complete the transition to Hollister and Pueblo. We implemented a global price increase to take effect during the third fiscal quarter to address our increased raw material costs. In our creosote segment, we have experienced increased costs this fiscal year as compared to the prior year, and a lower average price. At the end of fiscal year 2010 we entered into a long-term contract to sell creosote to our largest customer following its acquisition of another of our large customers. Although this arrangement has had the effect of increasing creosote volume substantially, margins have declined from the unusually high levels experienced in fiscal year 2010 to what we believe is a more normal level.
Other companies may include certain of the costs that we record in cost of sales as distribution expenses or selling, general and administrative expenses, and may include certain of the costs that we record in distribution expenses or selling, general and administrative expenses as a component of cost of sales, resulting in a lack of comparability between our gross profit and that reported by other companies.
Distribution Expenses
Distribution expenses are presented as a line item separate from our selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income. Prior year information has been reclassified to conform to this presentation.
Distribution expenses increased $3.0 million, or 68.8%, to $7.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 as compared with $4.4 million in the prior year period. For the six month comparison, distribution expense increased $4.3 million, or 46.3%, to $13.7 million in fiscal year 2011 from $9.4 million in fiscal year 2010. Distribution expenses were approximately 11.3% and 10.8% of net sales for the second quarter and for the first six months of fiscal year 2011, respectively, and 9.7% and 9.9% for the comparable prior year periods.

 

16


Table of Contents

We recognized an increase in distribution expense in our electronic chemicals segment of approximately $2.7 million and $3.8 million for the three and six months ended January 31, 2011, respectively, as compared to the same prior year periods. The increase was primarily due to increased expense on greater volume from the General Chemical acquisition for storage, handling and freight of about $2.4 million and $3.5 million for the three and six month periods, respectively, as compared to the prior year periods. For electronic chemicals, distribution expense was 17.4% of net sales in the second quarter and 15.9% for the six month period in fiscal year 2011, as compared to 15.6% and 16.9%, respectively, for the comparable periods in the prior year. The increase in distribution expense as a percent of sales was due to higher diesel fuel costs, the impact of our integration effort and additional freight incurred to meet shortage conditions arising from unscheduled plant outages at two suppliers in the United States. Those suppliers have now resumed production. Our two wood preservatives segments and our animal health segments had an aggregate increase of approximately $300,000 and $500,000 in distribution expenses in the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2011, respectively, mainly because of higher freight costs, storage and steaming costs for creosote storage and higher, volume related railcar cleaning expenses. With increased creosote throughput and milder temperatures, we expect storage and steaming costs will decline in the second half of the fiscal year.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $6.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 and $5.4 million in the same quarter of fiscal year 2010. Those expenses were 9.4% of sales in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 and 12.0% of sales in the second quarter of the prior year. For the six month comparison, selling, general and administrative expense increased $693,000, or 6.4%, to $11.5 million in fiscal year 2011 from $10.9 million in fiscal year 2010.
Selling, general and administrative expenses associated with our electronic chemicals segment increased approximately $710,000, to $3.1 million, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 as compared to $2.4 million for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, and increased $1.1 million, to $6.0 million, for the six month period as compared to the same prior year period. The increases in both the three and six month periods were primarily related to higher employee costs of approximately $300,000 and $500,000, respectively. The three and six month periods included integration costs of approximately $61,000 and $237,000, respectively, in connection with the electronic chemicals business we acquired from General Chemical in March 2010. We also recognized modest increases in other professional services for both the three and six month periods. Selling, general and administrative expenses related to each of our other segments were relatively flat.
Other corporate expense decreased by approximately $137,000 and $517,000 for the three and six month periods, respectively, as compared to the prior year periods. Other corporate expense represents those expenses associated with our operation as a public entity and includes costs such as board compensation, audit expense and fees related to the listing of our stock. See Note 11 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $599,000 in the second quarter and $1.2 million in the first six months of fiscal year 2011 as compared with $535,000 and $1.1 million in the comparable periods of fiscal year 2010. The increase was due to an increase in our revolving loan facility balance to finance the acquisition of the electronic chemicals business of General Chemical in March 2010.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 38.1% and 33.5% in the second quarter and the first six months, respectively, of fiscal years 2011, and 37.3% for each of the prior year periods. The current six month period income tax expense was net of a discrete period adjustment of $410,000 recognized in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 reflecting the reversal of a portion of the valuation allowance related to a foreign subsidiary.

 

17


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities was $10.4 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2011 as compared to $5.2 million for the comparable period in 2010. Net income adjusted for depreciation and amortization increased cash to $9.8 million in the first six months of fiscal year 2011. Changes in operating assets and liabilities included an increase of $1.6 million in accounts payable and a decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets of approximately $939,000, both of which had a favorable impact on cash. The increase in accounts payable was primarily related to our recently acquired electronic chemicals business and the timing of creosote purchases. Prepaid expense and other current assets decreased as a result of a reduction in prepaid insurance. Cash was unfavorably impacted by a decrease in accrued liabilities of $1.9 million and an increase in inventories of $632,000. Accrued liabilities decreased mainly as a result of a reduction in our employee bonus accrual. The net increase in inventories was due to increased inventories in our electronic chemicals segment mostly offset by reduced inventories in our creosote segment.
Net cash used in investing activities in the first six months of fiscal 2011 was $3.8 million as compared with $390,000 in the prior year period. We made additions to property, plant and equipment of $4.0 million during the first six months of fiscal year 2011 as compared to $500,000 in the same period of fiscal year 2010. In the first six months of fiscal year 2011 we spent approximately $1.3 million in connection with our ongoing expansion project at our Hollister, CA facility. We additionally made approximately $1.7 million of capital expenditures at our Pueblo, CO facility for equipment purchases and upgrades, some of which are in connection with our ongoing consolidation of our United States based electronic chemicals manufacturing. We also made expenditures of $411,000 for equipment at our Milan, Italy facility. The remaining capital expenditures were for normal equipment and system upgrades and purchases across our different locations. The expenditures in the prior year period were primarily in our electronic chemicals segment.
Net cash used in financing activities was $7.1 million in the first six months of fiscal year 2011 as compared to $3.2 million in the comparable prior year period. In the first six months of fiscal year 2011, we made principal payments of $4.0 million on the term loan indebtedness we incurred when we purchased the electronic chemicals business in December 2007. We additionally made payments of $3.0 million on our revolving credit line in the six month period which reflects amounts borrowed to fund our March 2010 acquisition. In the first six months of fiscal year 2010, we made principal payments of $3.0 million on the term loan indebtedness.
We paid dividends of $452,000 and $445,000 in the first six months of fiscal years 2011 and 2010, respectively. On February 24, 2011, we announced an increase in our quarterly dividend rate to $0.025 per share from $0.020 per share, a 25% increase. It is our policy to pay dividends from available cash after taking into consideration our profitability, capital requirements, financial condition, growth, business opportunities and other factors which our board of directors may deem relevant, and the increase in the quarterly dividend reflects that analysis.
Working Capital
We have a revolving line of credit under an amended and restated credit agreement. At January 31, 2011, we had $17.0 million outstanding under that revolving facility, and our net borrowing base availability was $18.2 million. Management believes that our current credit facility, combined with cash flows from operations, will adequately provide for our working capital needs for current operations for the next twelve months.
Long Term Obligations
To finance the acquisition of the electronic chemicals business in December 2007, we entered into a credit agreement and a note purchase agreement with Wachovia Bank, National Association, a subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Co., Bank of America, N.A., The Prudential Insurance Company of America, and Pruco Life Insurance Company. The new credit facility included a revolving loan facility of $35.0 million and a term loan facility of $35.0 million. We amended those facilities in March 2010 to increase the amount that may be borrowed under the revolving loan facility to $50.0 million. Advances under the revolving loan and the term loan mature December 31, 2012. They each bear interest at varying rate of LIBOR plus a margin based on our funded debt to EBITDA, as described below.
         
Ratio of Funded Debt to EBITDA   Margin  
Equal to or greater than 3.0 to 1.0
    2.75 %
Equal to or greater than 2.5 to 1.0, but less than 3.0 to 1.0
    2.50 %
Equal to or greater than 2.0 to 1.0, but less than 2.5 to 1.0
    2.25 %
Equal to or greater than 1.5 to 1.0, but less than 2.0 to 1.0
    2.00 %
Less than 1.5 to 1.0
    1.75 %
As of February 28, 2011, advances bear interest at 2.26% per year (LIBOR plus 2.00%). For the first 24 months of the term facility, principal payments were $458,333 per month, and then beginning January 2010 principal payments became $666,667 per month for the balance of the term prior to maturity. The purchase of the electronic chemicals assets from General Chemical on March 29, 2010 was funded with available cash and borrowings under the revolving loan. At January 31, 2011, $17.0 million was outstanding on the revolving facility and $15.3 million was outstanding on the term loan.

 

18


Table of Contents

The financing for the acquisition of the electronic chemicals business in fiscal year 2008 included a $20.0 million note purchase agreement with the Prudential Insurance Company of America. Advances under the note purchase agreement mature December 31, 2014, and bear interest at 7.43% per annum. Principal is payable at maturity. At January 31, 2011, $20.0 million was outstanding under the note purchase agreement.
Loans under the amended and restated credit facility and the note purchase agreement are secured by our assets, including inventory, accounts receivable, equipment, intangible assets and real property. The credit facility and the note purchase agreement have restrictive covenants, including that we must maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.5 to 1.0, and a ratio of funded debt to EBITDA of 3.0 to 1.0. We are also obligated to maintain a debt to capitalization ratio of not more than 50%. For purposes of calculating these financial covenant ratios, we use a pro forma EBITDA. On January 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements, such as financing or unconsolidated variable interest entities.
Recent Accounting Standards
We have considered all recently issued accounting standards updates and SEC rules and interpretive releases, and believe that only the following item could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new accounting guidance for the disclosure of supplementary pro forma information for business combinations. The guidance clarifies the acquisition date that should be used for reporting the pro forma financial information disclosures when comparative financial statements are presented and specifies that the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The guidance also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosure requirements to include a description of the nature and amount of material, non recurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma information. The new guidance is effective prospectively for business combinations with an acquisition date on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the new guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. There were no significant changes in our critical accounting policies as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010.
Disclosure Regarding Forward Looking Statements
We are including the following discussion to inform our existing and potential security holders generally of some of the risks and uncertainties that can affect us and to take advantage of the “safe harbor” protection for forward-looking statements that applicable federal securities law affords. From time to time, our management or persons acting on our behalf make forward-looking statements to inform existing and potential security holders about our company. These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our operations. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included or incorporated by reference in this report that address activities, events or developments that we expect or anticipate may occur in the future, including such things as future capital expenditures, business strategy, competitive strengths, goals, growth of our business and operations, plans and references to future successes may be considered forward-looking statements. Also, when we use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “forecast,” “may,” “should,” “budget,” “goal,” “expect,” “probably” or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements. Many risks and uncertainties may impact the matters addressed in these forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made and we will not update forward-looking statements unless the securities laws require us to do so.

 

19


Table of Contents

Some of the key factors which could cause our future financial results and performance to vary from those expected include:
    the loss of primary customers;
 
    our ability to implement productivity improvements, cost reduction initiatives or facilities expansions;
 
    market developments affecting, and other changes in, the demand for our products and the introduction of new competing products;
 
    availability or increases in the price of our primary raw materials or active ingredients;
 
    the timing of planned capital expenditures;
 
    our ability to identify, develop or acquire, and market additional product lines and businesses necessary to implement our business strategy and our ability to finance such acquisitions and development;
 
    the condition of the capital markets generally, which will be affected by interest rates, foreign currency fluctuations and general economic conditions;
 
    cost and other effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims, including environmental liabilities which may not be covered by indemnity or insurance;
 
    the effects of weather, earthquakes, other natural disasters and terrorist attacks;
 
    the ability to obtain registration and re-registration of our products under applicable law;
 
    the political and economic climate in the foreign or domestic jurisdictions in which we conduct business; and
 
    other United States or foreign regulatory or legislative developments which affect the demand for our products generally or increase the environmental compliance cost for our products or impose liabilities on the manufacturers and distributors of such products.
The information contained in this report, including the information set forth under the heading “Risk Factors”, identifies additional factors that could cause our results or performance to differ materially from those we express in our forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of these assumptions and, therefore, the forward-looking statements based on these assumptions, could themselves prove to be inaccurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements which are included in this report and the exhibits and other documents incorporated herein by reference, our inclusion of this information is not a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved.
ITEM 3.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to certain market risks in the ordinary course of our business, arising primarily from changes in interest rates and to a lesser extent foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Generally we do not utilize derivative financial instruments or hedging transactions to manage that risk.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
As of January 31, 2011 our fixed rate debt consisted of $20.0 million of term notes with an interest rate of 7.43%, maturing on December 31, 2014.
As of January 31, 2011 our variable rate debt consisted of a credit facility with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.00%, maturing on December 31, 2012. On January 31, 2011, we had $17.0 million borrowed on our $50.0 million revolving credit line under that facility, and $15.3 million borrowed on a term loan under that same facility. Principal payments on the term loan were $458,333 per month for the first two years of the term facility and now are $666,667 per month for the remaining term of the facility.

 

20


Table of Contents

Based on the outstanding balance of the term loan and the LIBOR rate as of January 31, 2011, a 1.0% change in the interest rate would result in a change of approximately $225,000 in interest expense for the next twelve months.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates from the international operations of our electronic chemicals segment. Those international operations are centered in Europe and use the Euro as their functional currency, rather than the U.S. Dollar which is our consolidated reporting currency. Currency translation gains and losses result from the process of translating the segment’s financial statements from its functional currency into our reporting currency. Currency translation gains and losses have no impact on the consolidated statements of income and are recorded as other comprehensive income (loss) within stockholders’ equity in our consolidated balance sheets. Assets and liabilities have been translated using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates. Revenues and expenses have been translated using the average exchange rates during the period.
During the six months ended January 31, 2011, we recognized foreign currency translation gains of $1.2 million as other comprehensive income in the consolidated balance sheets. At January 31, 2011, the cumulative foreign currency translation loss reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss was $2.2 million.
Additionally we have limited exposure to certain transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency in our Italy operations. Accordingly, we recognize exchange gains or losses in our consolidated statement of operations from these transactions. We believe the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not have a material effect on our results of operations or cash flows.
ITEM 4.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The term “disclosure controls and procedures” is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This term refers to the controls and procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
There were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarterly period covered by this Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The trustee in the bankruptcy proceeding of one of our customers, In re Spansion, Inc. et al, has filed an action against us seeking the return of $538,000 in payments allegedly made by the bankrupt to us in the ninety (90) days prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition. The bankruptcy commenced on December 1, 2009. The action against us alleges a right to recovery of the payments as a preference and under several other legal theories. The action is styled as In re Spansion, Inc., et al. and Pirinate Consulting Group LLC, Claims Agent for the Chapter 11 Estate of Spansion, Inc., et al. vs. KMG Electronic Chemicals, Inc., and it was filed February 25, 2011 in the United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware (Bk. No. 09-10690-KJC; Adv. Proc. No. 11-51094-KJC). Previously, we had filed a claim for unpaid invoices in the bankruptcy in the amount of approximately $483,000. Given the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the ultimate outcome cannot be predicted at this time, nor can the amount of any potential loss be reasonably estimated.
We have previously reported that litigation was filed in 2007 against us in Superior Court, Fulton County, Georgia (Atlanta) styled John Bailey, et al vs Cleveland G. Meredith et al. The case was consolidated in the Superior Court with other plaintiffs’ cases as Thompson et al vs Meredith et al. The plaintiffs are persons living near the wood treating facility of one of our customers. The plaintiffs complain that emissions from the wood treating facility have caused harm to their property and person, and claim that we are also responsible because we sold wood treating chemicals to the facility. In fiscal year 2010, the court granted our motion for summary judgment and dismissed us from the case, but the plaintiffs have appealed. Given the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the ultimate outcome cannot be predicted at this time, nor can the amount of any potential loss be reasonably estimated.

 

21


Table of Contents

We discontinued the operation of our agricultural herbicide product line, referred to as MSMA, but in connection with that product line we were a member of the MSMA task force. An entity related to the MSMA task force, Arsonate Herbicide Products, Limited) (“AHP”), was sued by Albaugh, Inc. in 2007 claiming that AHP overbilled it for certain task force expenses. Although Albaugh Inc. had agreed to reimburse AHP for certain task force expenses for MSMA studies and registration support costs, it claims that it was overbilled for many years by at least $900,000. The case was tried in October 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the So. District of Iowa, and styled as Albaugh, Inc. vs. Arsonate Herbicide Products, Limited. The court has not yet rendered a ruling on the case. Given the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the ultimate outcome cannot be predicted at this time, nor can the amount of any potential loss be reasonably estimated.
We have previously reported that a lawsuit was filed against our subsidiary, KMG de Mexico, relating to the title to the land on which our facility in Matamoros is located. The plaintiffs claim that their title to the land was superior to the person from whom our subsidiary bought the land. The lawsuit was initially filed in 1998 Matamoros, Mexico under Adolfo Cazares Rosas, et al vs. KMG de Mexico and Guillermo Villarreal. The plaintiffs are seeking to have our purchase overturned and to recover the land or its value. In January 2008, the case was sent by the appeals court back to the lower court to obtain additional factual information, and in April 20, 2009 the plaintiffs were required to re-file the case in the First Civil Court in Matamoros, Tamaulipas, Mexico as Adolfo Cazares, Luis Escudero and Juan Cue vs. KMG de Mexico and Guillermo Villarreal. The ultimate outcome of this litigation cannot be determined at this time, nor can the amount of any potential loss be reasonably estimated.
We are periodically a party to other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the outcome of any of those matters will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
ITEM 1A.   RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes to the risk factors contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010.
ITEM 2.   UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Not applicable.
ITEM 3.   DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4.   REMOVED AND RESERVED
ITEM 5.   OTHER INFORMATION
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider recommendations for directors made by shareholders for fiscal year 2012, if such recommendations are received in writing, addressed to the chair of the committee, Mr. Urbanowski, in care of the Company, at 9555 W. Sam Houston Parkway S., Suite 600, Houston, Texas 77099 by July 2, 2011.
ITEM 6.   EXHIBITS
The financial statements are filed as part of this report in Part 1, Item 1. The following documents are filed as exhibits. Documents marked with an asterisk (*) are management contracts or compensatory plans, and portions of documents marked with a dagger (†) have been granted confidential treatment.
         
  31.1    
Certificates under Section 302 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Executive Officer.
       
 
  31.2    
Certificates under Section 302 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Financial Officer.
       
 
  32.1    
Certificates under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Executive Officer.
       
 
  32.2    
Certificates under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Financial Officer.

 

22


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
KMG Chemicals, Inc.    
 
       
By:
  /s/ J. Neal Butler
 
J. Neal Butler
  Date: March 11, 2011 
 
  President and Chief Executive Officer    
 
       
By:
  /s/ John V. Sobchak   Date: March 11, 2011
 
       
 
  John V. Sobchak    
 
  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    

 

23