Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - FORM 8-K - Prologis, Inc. | f58043e8vk.htm |
Exhibit 99.1
Supplemental Analyst Package 2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call February 3, 2011 |
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Company Profile |
|||
AMB Property Corporation® is a leading owner, operator and developer of industrial real
estate, focused on major hub and gateway distribution markets in the Americas, Europe and Asia. As
of December 31, 2010, AMB owned or had investments in, on a consolidated basis or through
unconsolidated joint ventures, properties and development projects expected to total approximately
159.6 million square feet (14.8 million square meters) in 49 markets within 15 countries.
AMB invests in properties located predominantly in the infill submarkets of its targeted markets.
AMBs portfolio is comprised primarily of High Throughput Distribution® facilities built
for efficiency and located near airports, seaports, ground transportation systems, and population
concentrations.
Through its private capital group, AMB provides real estate investment, portfolio management and
reporting services to co-investment ventures and clients. Private capital revenue consists of asset
management distributions and fees, acquisition and development fees as well as incentive
distributions.
The Americas |
Europe |
Asia |
||||||||||
Operating Portfolio(1)
|
123.2 msf | Operating Portfolio(1) | 13.5 msf | Operating Portfolio(1) | 13.9 msf | |||||||
Development
Portfolio(2)(3) |
4.0 msf | Development Portfolio(2)(3) | 1.9 msf | Development Portfolio(2)(3) | 3.1 msf | |||||||
Land Inventory(3)
|
2,296 acres | Land Inventory(3) | 227 acres | Land Inventory(3) | 118 acres | |||||||
(1) | The operating portfolio includes the owned and managed portfolio and operating properties held through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage (excluded from the owned and managed portfolio), value-added acquisitions and the location of AMBs global headquarters. | |
(2) | Includes pre-stabilized development properties. | |
(3) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated joint ventures. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 1 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Highlights (dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|||
For the Quarters Ended December 31, | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 165,058 | $ | 159,667 | 3.4 | % | $ | 633,500 | $ | 618,424 | 2.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
111,621 | 100,478 | 11.1 | % | 427,446 | 493,400 | (13.4 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
4,865 | (7,565 | ) | 164.3 | % | 9,967 | (50,077 | ) | 119.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
FFO, as adjusted(1)(2) |
55,988 | 48,131 | 16.3 | % | 210,187 | 288,841 | (27.2 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Core FFO, as adjusted(1)(2) |
54,975 | 47,943 | 14.7 | % | 203,416 | 201,210 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Per diluted share and unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
EPS |
$ | 0.03 | $ | (0.05 | ) | 160.0 | % | $ | 0.06 | $ | (0.37 | ) | 116.2 | % | ||||||||||
FFO, as adjusted(1)(2) |
0.33 | 0.32 | 3.1 | % | 1.27 | 2.09 | (39.2 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Core FFO, as adjusted(1)(2) |
0.32 | 0.32 | 0.0 | % | 1.22 | 1.46 | (16.4 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends per common share |
0.28 | 0.28 | 0.0 | % | 1.12 | 1.12 | 0.0 | % |
Financial(3) |
Completed $1.9 billion in capital markets transactions in the fourth quarter and approximately
$4.0 billion in 2010
Approximately $1.6 billion in liquidity; consisting of approximately $1.4 billion of
availability on lines of credit and more than $260 million of unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
Operations(3) |
93.7% occupancy at the end of the fourth quarter; 92.6% fourth quarter average occupancy;
91.2% average occupancy for the full year
0.9% fourth quarter cash basis same store NOI, marking the first positive SS NOI since the
fourth quarter of 2008; (3.2)% for the full year
Commenced 7.7 msf of leases in the fourth quarter; totaling more than 32.0 msf for the full
year
(11.6)% fourth quarter rent changes on renewals and rollover; (11.9)% for the trailing four
quarters
|
|
Capital Deployment(3) |
Leased 1.2 msf in the development portfolio during the fourth
quarter, of which 680,000 sf was in the static 12/31/09 development
portfolio, and more than 5.7 msf for the full year
Deployed approximately $230.2 million in the fourth quarter ($429.3 million in 2010),
including the acquisition of seven(4) properties for $144.2 million (16 properties
for $343.3 million in 2010) and an $86.0 million joint venture mortgage debt investment
Commenced $32.9 million of development in the fourth quarter; $102.9 million for the full year
in China, Brazil and Mexico, of which 44% is pre-leased
Completed $56.0 million in dispositions in the fourth quarter; $153.3 million for the full year |
|
Private Capital |
Raised $355.1 million in new third-party equity in the fourth quarter; totaling $781.4 million
in 2010 marking a record year of fundraising in our 27-year history
Formed AMB Brazil Logistics Partners Fund I with an overall joint venture equity commitment of
R$720 million (approximately USD $434 million using the exchange rate in effect on December 31,
2010); one of two new funds created in 2010
$ 100 million investment in October 2010 by AMB consisting of $50 million in AMB U.S.
Logistics Fund and $50 million in AMB Europe Logistics Fund; totaling $300 million invested by
AMB in 2010
|
|
(1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(2) | See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, as adjusted and Core FFO, as adjusted. | |
(3) | Owned and managed portfolio. | |
(4) | Includes value-added acquisitions. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 2 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Overview of Funds From Operations, as
adjusted(1) |
|||
Funds From Operations, as adjusted(1)(2)
(per diluted common share and unit)
Estimated FFO, as
adjusted, by Business(1)(2)
(per diluted common share and unit)
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Real estate operations,
net of unallocated overhead |
$ | 1.07 | $ | 1.19 | $ | 1.53 | ||||||
Overhead reallocation |
0.29 | 0.32 | 0.46 | |||||||||
Real estate operations FFO,
as adjusted |
$ | 1.36 | $ | 1.51 | $ | 1.99 | ||||||
% of reported FFO, as adjusted |
107.1 | % | 72.2 | % | 68.6 | % | ||||||
Development Profits |
0.02 | 0.63 | 0.72 | |||||||||
Overhead allocation |
(0.19 | ) | (0.21 | ) | (0.33 | ) | ||||||
Development FFO, as adjusted |
$ | (0.17 | ) | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.39 | |||||
% of reported FFO, as adjusted |
(13.4 | %) | 20.1 | % | 13.5 | % | ||||||
Private Capital Revenues |
0.18 | 0.27 | 0.65 | |||||||||
Overhead allocation |
(0.10 | ) | (0.11 | ) | (0.13 | ) | ||||||
Private Capital FFO, as adjusted |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.52 | ||||||
% of reported FFO, as adjusted |
6.3 | % | 7.7 | % | 17.9 | % | ||||||
Total FFO, as adjusted |
$ | 1.27 | $ | 2.09 | $ | 2.90 | ||||||
Development Profits(1)(3)
(per diluted common share and unit)
Private Capital Revenue
(per diluted common share and unit)
(1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(2) | See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, as adjusted, for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. For a reconciliation of FFO, as adjusted from net income for the year ended December 31, 2008, please refer to AMBs Supplemental Analyst Package for the fourth quarter of 2009. As a reconciliation of FFO, as adjusted from FFO for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 as presented in AMBs Supplemental Analyst Package for the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company has made adjusting increases of $0.3 million for loss on early extinguishment of debt in 2007 and increases of $2.9 million and $1.1 million for preferred unit redemption premiums in 2007 and 2006, respectively. | |
(3) | Excludes co-investment venture partners share of development gains. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 3 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter
Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands, except per share data) |
|||
For the Quarters Ended December 31, | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Rental revenues |
$ | 156,057 | $ | 149,052 | $ | 602,640 | $ | 580,411 | ||||||||
Private capital revenues |
9,001 | 10,615 | 30,860 | 38,013 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
165,058 | 159,667 | 633,500 | 618,424 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating costs |
(46,459 | ) | (48,383 | ) | (188,710 | ) | (183,271 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(51,353 | ) | (50,718 | ) | (196,636 | ) | (175,334 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative |
(33,605 | ) | (31,131 | ) | (124,364 | ) | (115,342 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| (2,544 | ) | (4,874 | ) | (6,368 | ) | |||||||||
Fund costs |
(178 | ) | (238 | ) | (791 | ) | (1,062 | ) | ||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| | | (172,059 | ) | |||||||||||
Other expenses(1) |
(1,946 | ) | (2,176 | ) | (3,197 | ) | (8,681 | ) | ||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
(133,541 | ) | (135,190 | ) | (518,572 | ) | (662,117 | ) | ||||||||
Other income and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Development profits, net of taxes |
1,020 | 1,368 | 6,739 | 35,874 | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
4,956 | 3,824 | 17,372 | 11,331 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense)(1) |
1,507 | (323 | ) | 3,543 | 3,440 | |||||||||||
Interest expense, including
amortization |
(33,036 | ) | (30,772 | ) | (130,338 | ) | (118,867 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
(353 | ) | (11,614 | ) | (2,892 | ) | (12,267 | ) | ||||||||
Total other income and
expenses, net |
(25,906 | ) | (37,517 | ) | (105,576 | ) | (80,489 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) from
continuing operations |
5,611 | (13,040 | ) | 9,352 | (124,182 | ) | ||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to discontinued
operations |
1,193 | 1,358 | 3,994 | 4,502 | ||||||||||||
Development profits, net of taxes |
| | | 53,002 | ||||||||||||
Gains from sale of real estate
interests, net of taxes |
4,505 | 1,580 | 20,248 | 38,718 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
5,698 | 2,938 | 24,242 | 96,222 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
11,309 | (10,102 | ) | 33,594 | (27,960 | ) | ||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests share of net
income (loss) |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of
net income |
(2,058 | ) | (2,234 | ) | (6,278 | ) | (11,063 | ) | ||||||||
Joint venture partners and limited
partnership unitholders share of
development profits, net of taxes |
(16 | ) | (942 | ) | (109 | ) | (3,308 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred unitholders |
| | | (4,295 | ) | |||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
(83 | ) | 161 | (88 | ) | 3,625 | ||||||||||
Total noncontrolling
interests share of net
income (loss) |
(2,157 | ) | (3,015 | ) | (6,475 | ) | (15,041 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss)
attributable to
AMB Property
Corporation |
9,152 | (13,117 | ) | 27,119 | (43,001 | ) | ||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(3,950 | ) | (3,950 | ) | (15,806 | ) | (15,806 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred unit redemption discount |
| 9,759 | | 9,759 | ||||||||||||
Allocation to participating
securities(2) |
(337 | ) | (257 | ) | (1,346 | ) | (1,029 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common
stockholders |
$ | 4,865 | $ | (7,565 | ) | $ | 9,967 | $ | (50,077 | ) | ||||||
Net income (loss) per common share
(diluted) |
$ | 0.03 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.06 | $ | (0.37 | ) | ||||||
Weighted average common shares (diluted) |
167,311 | 147,047 | 161,988 | 134,321 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Includes changes in liabilities and assets associated with AMBs deferred compensation plan for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2010 of $1,069 and $1,460, respectively, and for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2009 of $969 and $7,823, respectively. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 4 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter
Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Consolidated Statements of Funds
from Operations, as adjusted(1) (in thousands, except per share data) |
|||
For the Quarters Ended December 31, | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | 4,865 | $ | (7,565 | ) | $ | 9,967 | $ | (50,077 | ) | ||||||
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net of taxes |
(4,505 | ) | (1,580 | ) | (20,248 | ) | (38,718 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
||||||||||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization |
51,353 | 50,718 | 196,636 | 175,334 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations depreciation |
69 | 1,208 | 3,447 | 6,602 | ||||||||||||
Non-real estate depreciation |
(1,906 | ) | (2,576 | ) | (8,432 | ) | (8,593 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustment for depreciation on development profits |
| | (1,546 | ) | | |||||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO, as adjusted from noncontrolling interests |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners noncontrolling interests (Net income) |
2,058 | 2,234 | 6,278 | 11,063 | ||||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Net income (loss)) |
83 | (161 | ) | 88 | (3,625 | ) | ||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Development profits) |
16 | 11 | 133 | 2,377 | ||||||||||||
FFO, as adjusted attributable to joint venture partners noncontrolling interests |
(7,454 | ) | (7,245 | ) | (28,251 | ) | (31,571 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO, as adjusted from unconsolidated joint ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of net income |
(4,956 | ) | (3,824 | ) | (17,372 | ) | (11,331 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO, as adjusted |
16,070 | 12,549 | 61,903 | 47,549 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments for impairments, restructuring charges and debt extinguishment |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| | | 172,059 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations real estate impairment losses |
| | | 9,794 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 2,544 | 4,874 | 6,368 | ||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
353 | 11,614 | 2,892 | 12,267 | ||||||||||||
Preferred unit redemption discount |
| (9,759 | ) | | (9,759 | ) | ||||||||||
Allocation to participating securities(1) |
(58 | ) | (37 | ) | (182 | ) | (898 | ) | ||||||||
Funds from operations, as adjusted(1) |
$ | 55,988 | $ | 48,131 | $ | 210,187 | $ | 288,841 | ||||||||
FFO, as adjusted per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 2.09 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares and units (diluted) |
171,752 | 150,993 | 166,127 | 137,904 | ||||||||||||
Core Funds From Operations, as adjusted |
||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations, as adjusted |
$ | 55,988 | $ | 48,131 | $ | 210,187 | $ | 288,841 | ||||||||
Development profits, net of taxes |
(1,020 | ) | (1,368 | ) | (6,739 | ) | (88,876 | ) | ||||||||
Joint venture partners and limited partnership unitholders share of development profits, net of taxes |
16 | 942 | 61 | 3,308 | ||||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Development profits) |
(16 | ) | (11 | ) | (133 | ) | (2,377 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of development gains from unconsolidated joint ventures |
| 248 | (9 | ) | (271 | ) | ||||||||||
Allocation to participating securities(1) |
7 | 1 | 49 | 585 | ||||||||||||
Core Funds From Operations, as adjusted(1) |
$ | 54,975 | $ | 47,943 | $ | 203,416 | $ | 201,210 | ||||||||
Core FFO, as adjusted per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 1.22 | $ | 1.46 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares and units (diluted) |
171,752 | 150,993 | 166,127 | 137,904 | ||||||||||||
(1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 5 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter
Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets (dollars in thousands) |
|||
As of | ||||||||
December 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Investments in real estate |
||||||||
Total investments in properties |
$ | 6,906,176 | $ | 6,708,660 | ||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(1,268,093 | ) | (1,113,808 | ) | ||||
Net investments in properties |
5,638,083 | 5,594,852 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
883,241 | 462,130 | ||||||
Properties held for sale or contribution, net |
242,098 | 214,426 | ||||||
Net investments in real estate |
6,763,422 | 6,271,408 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
228,415 | 206,077 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
167,735 | 155,958 | ||||||
Other assets |
213,323 | 208,515 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 7,372,895 | $ | 6,841,958 | ||||
Liabilities and equity |
||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Secured debt |
$ | 962,434 | $ | 1,096,554 | ||||
Unsecured senior debt |
1,685,956 | 1,155,529 | ||||||
Unsecured credit facilities |
268,933 | 477,630 | ||||||
Other debt |
413,976 | 482,883 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
339,474 | 338,042 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,670,773 | 3,550,638 | ||||||
Equity |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Common equity |
3,097,311 | 2,716,604 | ||||||
Preferred equity |
223,412 | 223,412 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
3,320,723 | 2,940,016 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
||||||||
Joint venture partners |
325,590 | 289,909 | ||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
55,809 | 61,395 | ||||||
Total noncontrolling interests |
381,399 | 351,304 | ||||||
Total equity |
3,702,122 | 3,291,320 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 7,372,895 | $ | 6,841,958 | ||||
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 6 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Supplemental Cash Flow Information (dollars in thousands) |
|||
For the Quarters Ended | For the Years Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
AMBs Owned and Managed Portfolio:(1)(2) |
||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 9,261 | $ | 9,040 | $ | 31,471 | $ | 29,181 | ||||||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 6,234 | $ | 4,599 | $ | 19,531 | $ | 14,099 | ||||||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 2,231 | $ | 581 | $ | 5,561 | $ | 6,067 | ||||||||
Net lease termination fees(3) |
$ | 1,820 | $ | 407 | $ | 4,414 | $ | 4,324 | ||||||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 639 | $ | 232 | $ | 3,021 | $ | 2,076 | ||||||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 5,931 | $ | 6,488 | $ | 30,167 | $ | 20,185 | ||||||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
7,273 | 6,936 | 32,802 | 26,452 | ||||||||||||
Building improvements |
10,106 | 11,796 | 34,219 | 25,415 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total |
23,310 | 25,220 | 97,188 | 72,052 | ||||||||||||
Co-investment venture partners share of capital expenditures |
(8,178 | ) | (8,728 | ) | (29,871 | ) | (26,219 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 15,132 | $ | 16,492 | $ | 67,317 | $ | 45,833 | ||||||||
AMBs Consolidated Portfolio: |
||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 5,253 | $ | 3,628 | $ | 16,305 | $ | 10,531 | ||||||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 4,852 | $ | 3,407 | $ | 14,754 | $ | 10,279 | ||||||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 272 | $ | 320 | $ | 3,236 | $ | 3,134 | ||||||||
Net lease termination fees(3) |
$ | | $ | 195 | $ | 2,322 | $ | 1,792 | ||||||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | | $ | 187 | $ | 2,293 | $ | 1,509 | ||||||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 3,886 | $ | 4,032 | $ | 21,405 | $ | 11,969 | ||||||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
4,455 | 4,038 | 22,040 | 17,312 | ||||||||||||
Building improvements |
5,310 | 9,759 | 21,869 | 19,872 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total |
13,651 | 17,829 | 65,314 | 49,153 | ||||||||||||
Co-investment venture partners share of capital expenditures |
(1,559 | ) | (2,993 | ) | (7,830 | ) | (7,661 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 12,092 | $ | 14,836 | $ | 57,484 | $ | 41,492 | ||||||||
(1) | See Reporting Definitions. | |
(2) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosure for a discussion of owned and managed supplemental cash flow information. | |
(3) | Net lease termination fees are defined as gross lease termination fees less the associated straight-line rent balance. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 7 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Operations Overview(1) (dollars in thousands) |
|||
ABR | % of ABR | Sq Ft | ||||||||||||
1 | Deutsche Post World Net (DHL) |
$ | 28,197 | 3.1 | % | 3,106,516 | ||||||||
2 | United States Government |
20,349 | 2.2 | 1,357,525 | ||||||||||
3 | Sagawa Express |
19,968 | 2.2 | 1,172,253 | ||||||||||
4 | Nippon Express |
15,258 | 1.7 | 1,029,170 | ||||||||||
5 | FedEx Corporation |
14,369 | 1.6 | 1,291,035 | ||||||||||
6 | Kuehne + Nagel Inc. |
12,807 | 1.4 | 2,044,892 | ||||||||||
7 | Panalpina |
10,992 | 1.2 | 1,703,945 | ||||||||||
8 | Caterpillar Logistics Services |
8,950 | 1.0 | 543,039 | ||||||||||
9 | Panasonic Logistics |
7,992 | 0.9 | 620,273 | ||||||||||
10 | BAX Global/Schenker/Deutsche Bahn |
7,697 | 0.8 | 811,450 | ||||||||||
Top 10 Customers |
$ | 146,579 | 16.1 | % | 13,680,098 | |||||||||
Top 11-20 Customers |
54,982 | 5.9 | 7,308,110 | |||||||||||
Top 20 Customers |
$ | 201,561 | 22.0 | % | 20,988,208 | |||||||||
(1) | Owned and managed portfolio, not including value-added acquisitions. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | Represents trailing four quarter data. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 8 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Operating Statistics |
|||
Owned & Managed Portfolio(1)(2) | Same Store Pool(1)(2) | |||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Square feet |
141,879,530 | 139,822,998 | 126,035,571 | 127,051,011 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of owned & managed square feet |
88.8 | % | 90.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Occupancy |
||||||||||||||||
Occupancy percentage at period end(2) |
93.7 | % | 92.6 | % | 93.2 | % | 92.1 | % | ||||||||
Occupancy percentage at period end (prior year) |
91.2 | % | 91.0 | % | 90.9 | % | 91.4 | % | ||||||||
Average occupancy percentage(2) |
92.6 | % | 91.7 | % | 92.2 | % | 91.3 | % | ||||||||
Average occupancy percentage (prior year) |
90.7 | % | 90.4 | % | 90.5 | % | 90.3 | % | ||||||||
Weighted average lease terms (years) |
||||||||||||||||
Original |
6.2 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.2 | ||||||||||||
Remaining |
3.3 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
Owned & Managed Portfolio(1)(2) | Same Store Pool(1)(2) | |||||||||||||||
Trailing Four Quarters | Trailing Four Quarters | Trailing Four Quarters | Trailing Four Quarters | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Tenant retention(2) |
69.6 | % | 67.1 | % | 63.5 | % | 66.0 | % | ||||||||
Rent change on renewals and rollovers(2) |
||||||||||||||||
Percentage |
(11.9 | %) | (11.8 | %) | (12.6 | %) | (11.9 | %) | ||||||||
Same space square footage commencing (millions) |
24.4 | 25.1 | 23.8 | 24.7 | ||||||||||||
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot(2) |
||||||||||||||||
Retained |
$ | 1.42 | $ | 1.43 | ||||||||||||
Re-tenanted |
$ | 2.54 | $ | 2.59 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average |
$ | 2.02 | $ | 2.01 | ||||||||||||
Second generation square footage commencing (millions) |
31.1 | 31.4 | ||||||||||||||
Gross operating margin(2) |
71.1 | % | 70.6 | % | 71.9 | % | 71.4 | % | ||||||||
Consolidated Portfolio(3) | Same Store Pool(1)(2) | |||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended | Year Ended | Quarter Ended | Year Ended | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | December 31, 2010 | December 31, 2010 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Cash Basis NOI percent change(2) |
||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in revenues excluding lease termination fees |
0.5 | % | (3.1 | %) | 1.1 | % | (2.5 | %) | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in expenses |
(2.9 | %) | 0.4 | % | 1.7 | % | (0.7 | %) | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in NOI excluding lease termination fees(2) |
2.0 | % | (4.6 | %) | 0.9 | % | (3.2 | %) | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in NOI including lease termination fees(2) |
1.9 | % | (4.4 | %) | 1.8 | % | (3.2 | %) |
(1) | Owned and managed portfolio, excluding value-added acquisitions. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | Excludes value-added acquisitions. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 9 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Portfolio Overview |
|||
% of Total | 2010 | Trailing 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owned and | AMBs Share | Same Store NOI | Qrtrs Rent | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sq Ft | Placed in | Sq Ft | Managed Sq | of Sq | 2010 | Growth w/out | Change on | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
as of | Acquired | Operations | Disposed | as of | Ft as of | Ft as of | Average | ABR psf as | Lease | Renewals and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9/30/2010 | Sq Ft | Sq Ft(1) | Sq Ft | 12/31/2010 | 12/31/2010 | 12/31/2010 | Occupancy | 12/31/2010 | Termination Fees(2) | Rollovers(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
18,959,573 | | (35,685 | ) | (72,239 | ) | 18,851,649 | 13.3 | % | 60.3 | % | 93.1 | % | $ | 6.33 | (0.1 | %) | (18.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago |
13,092,788 | | | | 13,092,788 | 9.2 | % | 59.4 | % | 90.8 | % | 4.90 | (2.7 | %) | (21.2 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No. New Jersey/New York |
13,054,990 | | (987 | ) | (30,960 | ) | 13,023,043 | 9.2 | % | 60.6 | % | 87.8 | % | 6.99 | (9.1 | %) | (14.1 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Area |
10,960,044 | 89,039 | | | 11,049,083 | 7.8 | % | 77.6 | % | 92.8 | % | 6.31 | (1.7 | %) | (1.5 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle |
7,883,361 | | | | 7,883,361 | 5.6 | % | 58.5 | % | 90.5 | % | 5.45 | (8.2 | %) | (10.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
South Florida |
7,033,739 | | (51 | ) | | 7,033,688 | 5.0 | % | 69.6 | % | 96.7 | % | 6.95 | 6.5 | % | (29.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. On-Tarmac |
2,468,183 | 129,534 | | | 2,597,717 | 1.8 | % | 90.3 | % | 88.3 | % | 18.68 | (4.6 | %) | (5.5 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other U.S. Markets |
28,924,678 | 282,639 | 75,427 | (960,807 | ) | 28,321,937 | 19.9 | % | 66.3 | % | 87.7 | % | 5.23 | (7.9 | %) | (19.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Total / Wtd Avg |
102,377,356 | 501,212 | 38,704 | (1,064,006 | ) | 101,853,266 | 71.8 | % | 65.0 | % | 90.8 | % | $ | 6.23 | (4.1 | %) | (15.1 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
3,564,450 | | | | 3,564,450 | 2.5 | % | 100.0 | % | 99.0 | % | $ | 5.70 | 28.7 | % | (19.7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico City |
4,584,473 | | 18 | | 4,584,491 | 3.2 | % | 42.4 | % | 95.5 | % | $ | 5.56 | (5.4 | %) | (7.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guadalajara |
2,898,582 | | 491,555 | | 3,390,137 | 2.4 | % | 33.0 | % | 92.0 | % | 4.49 | (12.8 | %) | (4.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Mexico Markets |
1,089,347 | | | | 1,089,347 | 0.8 | % | 71.8 | % | 72.2 | % | 4.27 | (66.4 | %) | (20.2 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico Total / Wtd Avg |
8,572,402 | | 491,573 | | 9,063,975 | 6.4 | % | 42.4 | % | 91.6 | % | $ | 5.04 | (11.1 | %) | (7.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total / Wtd Avg |
114,514,208 | 501,212 | 530,277 | (1,064,006 | ) | 114,481,691 | 80.7 | % | 64.3 | % | 90.8 | % | $ | 6.12 | (3.8 | %) | (14.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
4,320,878 | 796,561 | 73 | | 5,117,512 | 3.6 | % | 45.9 | % | 96.8 | % | $ | 7.31 | (6.9 | %) | (9.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
3,183,381 | 343,594 | 408,491 | | 3,935,466 | 2.8 | % | 48.9 | % | 96.5 | % | 7.97 | (4.5 | %) | (7.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
3,260,290 | | 110,709 | | 3,370,999 | 2.4 | % | 47.9 | % | 85.1 | % | 9.61 | (13.0 | %) | (10.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe Markets |
1,065,173 | | | | 1,065,173 | 0.7 | % | 53.3 | % | 100.0 | % | 10.89 | 0.9 | % | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total / Wtd Avg |
11,829,722 | 1,140,155 | 519,273 | | 13,489,150 | 9.5 | % | 47.9 | % | 93.6 | % | $ | 8.32 | (7.4 | %) | (9.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tokyo |
6,385,889 | | (2 | ) | | 6,385,887 | 4.5 | % | 34.1 | % | 93.5 | % | $ | 16.99 | 5.3 | % | (6.4 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Osaka |
2,000,037 | | 423,941 | | 2,423,978 | 1.7 | % | 34.0 | % | 92.8 | % | 13.17 | 11.1 | % | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan Total / Wtd Avg |
8,385,926 | | 423,939 | | 8,809,865 | 6.2 | % | 34.0 | % | 93.3 | % | $ | 15.92 | 6.6 | % | (4.6 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
3,563,318 | | 7 | | 3,563,325 | 2.5 | % | 100.0 | % | 85.3 | % | $ | 4.49 | (22.7 | %) | (0.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Singapore |
935,926 | | 5,675 | | 941,601 | 0.7 | % | 100.0 | % | 96.4 | % | 10.36 | (5.5 | %) | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia Markets |
593,898 | | | | 593,898 | 0.4 | % | 100.0 | % | 92.3 | % | 7.42 | (9.4 | %) | (19.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total / Wtd Avg |
13,479,068 | | 429,621 | | 13,908,689 | 9.8 | % | 58.2 | % | 91.8 | % | $ | 12.27 | (11.6 | %) | (0.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owned and Managed Total / Wtd Avg(2) |
139,822,998 | 1,641,367 | 1,479,171 | (1,064,006 | ) | 141,879,530 | 100.0 | % | 62.2 | % | 91.2 | % | $ | 6.95 | (3.2 | %) | (11.9 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Real Estate Investments(3) |
7,495,959 | | | | 7,495,959 | 51.8 | % | 86.9 | % | 5.60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Portfolio |
147,318,957 | 1,641,367 | 1,479,171 | (1,064,006 | ) | 149,375,489 | 61.6 | % | 91.0 | % | $ | 6.89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction-in-Progress (CIP) |
1,603,624 | 695,767 | (4) | | (5) | (125,227 | )(6) | 2,174,164 | 61.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-Stabilized Developments (PSD)(2) |
8,256,812 | 125,227 | (4) | (1,455,230 | )(5) | (147,160 | )(6) | 6,779,649 | 96.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Portfolio Subtotal |
9,860,436 | 820,994 | (1,455,230 | ) | (272,387 | ) | 8,953,813 | 87.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value-added acquisitions(2) |
1,218,530 | 85,000 | (75,175 | ) | | 1,228,355 | 95.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Global Portfolio |
158,397,923 | 2,547,361 | (51,234 | ) | (1,336,393 | ) | 159,557,657 | 63.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Represents assets placed in operations from development and may include positive/(negative) remeasurements of square footage as operating assets. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | Includes AMBs global headquarters and operating properties held through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage and are therefore excluded from the owned and managed portfolio. | |
(4) | For CIP, represents square footage of development starts. For PSD, represents new projects available. | |
(5) | For CIP, represents square footage of completed development projects placed in operations. For PSD, represents projects placed in operations. | |
(6) | For CIP, represents square footage of completed development projects placed in PSD or disposed. For PSD, represents projects disposed. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 10 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Capital Deployment Overview (dollars in millions) |
|||
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Acquisition Cost(2))
(1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. Estimated total investment is before the impact of real estate impairment losses. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | Owned and managed portfolio and value-added acquisitions, excludes land inventory purchases and mortgage debt investment. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 11 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Property Acquisitions(1) (dollars in thousands) |
|||
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2010 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition | % of Total | Acquisition | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sq Ft | Cost(2) | Acquisition Cost | Sq Ft | Cost(2) | Acquisition Cost | |||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
586,212 | $ | 54,446 | 37.8 | % | 3,325,074 | $ | 211,669 | 61.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
586,212 | $ | 54,446 | 37.8 | % | 3,325,074 | $ | 211,669 | 61.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
796,561 | $ | 67,068 | 46.5 | % | 974,553 | $ | 79,593 | 23.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Germany |
343,594 | 22,659 | 15.7 | % | 343,596 | 22,659 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | 0.0 | % | 140,264 | 29,388 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
1,140,155 | $ | 89,727 | 62.2 | % | 1,458,413 | $ | 131,640 | 38.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
China |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total Acquisitions |
1,726,367 | $ | 144,173 | 100.0 | % | 4,783,487 | $ | 343,309 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
By Entity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Property Corporation |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | 1,143,355 | $ | 36,886 | 10.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
AMB Europe Logistics Fund |
1,140,155 | 89,727 | 62.2 | % | 1,458,413 | 131,640 | 38.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund |
586,212 | 54,446 | 37.8 | % | 2,181,719 | 174,783 | 51.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total Acquisitions |
1,726,367 | $ | 144,173 | 100.0 | % | 4,783,487 | $ | 343,309 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
30.3 | % | 37.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate(3) |
6.9 | % | 7.0 | % |
(1) | Owned and managed portfolio and value-added acquisitions, excludes mortgage debt investment. | |
(2) | Includes estimated total acquisition capital expenditures of approximately $1.7 million and $8.6 million for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2010, respectively. | |
(3) | Excludes the impact of straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles. See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 12 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Contributions and Dispositions(1) (dollars in thousands) |
|||
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2010 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Operating Property | Development Property | Operating Property | Development Property(2) | |||||||||||||
AMBs Ownership Contributed and Disposed |
49.3 | % | 100.0 | % | 73.4 | % | 83.1 | % | ||||||||
Contribution Value and Disposition Price |
$ | 49,601 | $ | 6,400 | $ | 94,510 | $ | 58,763 | ||||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cap Rate(3)(4) |
7.5 | % | 6.7 | % | 7.3 | % | 7.3 | % | ||||||||
Development Margin, before real estate
impairment losses(4) |
N/A | (27.7 | %) | N/A | (11.7 | %) | ||||||||||
Development Margin, net of real estate
impairment losses(4) |
N/A | 10.8 | % | N/A | 7.9 | % |
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2010 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Property | Development Property | Operating Property | Development Property(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Square Feet | Square Feet | Land Acreage(5) | Square Feet | Square Feet | Land Acreage(5) | |||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
1,064,006 | 147,160 | | 1,666,181 | 485,022 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
1,064,006 | 147,160 | | 1,666,181 | 485,022 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| | | | 37,760 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | | | 141,933 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
| | | | 179,693 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
China |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
1,064,006 | 147,160 | | 1,666,181 | 664,715 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
(2) | Includes installment sale of 0.2 million square feet and $12.5 million initiated in the fourth quarter of 2009 and completed in the first quarter of 2010. | |
(3) | Excludes value-added conversions, development for sale, and land sales. | |
(4) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(5) | Represents acreage for land sales and value-added conversion projects. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 13 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Development Starts and Completions(1) (dollars in thousands) |
|||
Development Starts(2) | Development Completions(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Quarter Ended | For the Year Ended | For the Quarter Ended | For the Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | December 31, 2010 | December 31, 2010 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated | % of Total | Estimated | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated | Total | Estimated | Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | % of Total | Total | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sq Ft | Investment(2) | Investment(2) | Sq Ft | Investment(2) | Investment(2) | Sq Ft | Investment(3) | Investment(2) | Sq Ft | Investment(3) | Investment(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | 389,767 | $ | 36,009 | 9.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
221,233 | 11,625 | 35.3 | % | 860,497 | 68,146 | 66.2 | % | | | 0.0 | % | 607,202 | 47,854 | 12.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
221,233 | $ | 11,625 | 35.3 | % | 860,497 | $ | 68,146 | 66.2 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | 996,969 | $ | 83,863 | 21.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | 692,754 | $ | 53,860 | 13.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | 427,832 | 47,744 | 12.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | 125,227 | 24,295 | 100.0 | % | 573,350 | 78,067 | 19.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | 125,227 | $ | 24,295 | 100.0 | % | 1,693,936 | $ | 179,671 | 45.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | 420,847 | $ | 54,415 | 13.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
474,534 | 21,264 | 64.7 | % | 755,752 | 34,718 | 33.8 | % | | | 0.0 | % | 1,592,826 | 77,565 | 19.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
474,534 | $ | 21,264 | 64.7 | % | 755,752 | $ | 34,718 | 33.8 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | 2,013,673 | $ | 131,980 | 33.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
695,767 | $ | 32,889 | 100.0 | % | 1,616,249 | $ | 102,864 | 100.0 | % | 125,227 | $ | 24,295 | 100.0 | % | 4,704,578 | $ | 395,514 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage | 100.0 | % | 59.0 | % | 50.0 | % | 92.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield(2)(4) | 8.7 | % | 11.2 | % | 6.3 | % | 6.3 | % |
(1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | Includes value-added conversions. | |
(4) | Calculated using estimated total investment before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 14 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Development Portfolio(1) (dollars in thousands) |
|||
2011 Expected Completions(2) | 2012 Expected Completions(2) | Total Construction-in-Progress | Pre-Stabilized Developments(2) | Total Development Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sq Ft | Investment(2)(3) | Sq Ft | Investment(2)(3) | Sq Ft | Investment(2)(3) | Sq Ft | Investment(2)(3) | Sq Ft | Investment(2)(3) | Investment(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
557,915 | $ | 66,701 | | $ | | 557,915 | $ | 66,701 | 1,312,326 | $ | 158,646 | 1,870,241 | $ | 225,347 | 24.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
639,264 | 57,462 | 221,233 | 11,625 | 860,497 | 69,087 | 1,228,613 | 87,250 | 2,089,110 | 156,337 | 16.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
1,197,179 | $ | 124,163 | 221,233 | $ | 11,625 | 1,418,412 | $ | 135,788 | 2,540,939 | $ | 245,896 | 3,959,351 | $ | 381,684 | 40.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| $ | | | $ | | | $ | | 647,976 | $ | 49,299 | 647,976 | $ | 49,299 | 5.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | | | | | 139,608 | 18,053 | 139,608 | 18,053 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
| | | | | | 669,881 | 94,583 | 669,881 | 94,583 | 10.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | | | | | 444,043 | 44,789 | 444,043 | 44,789 | 4.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
| $ | | | $ | | | $ | | 1,901,508 | $ | 206,724 | 1,901,508 | $ | 206,724 | 22.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | | $ | | | $ | | 1,811,434 | $ | 292,730 | 1,811,434 | $ | 292,730 | 31.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
281,218 | 13,699 | 474,534 | 21,264 | 755,752 | 34,963 | 525,768 | 22,225 | 1,281,520 | 57,188 | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | | | | | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
281,218 | $ | 13,699 | 474,534 | $ | 21,264 | 755,752 | $ | 34,963 | 2,337,202 | $ | 314,955 | 3,092,954 | $ | 349,918 | 37.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
1,478,397 | $ | 137,862 | 695,767 | $ | 32,889 | 2,174,164 | $ | 170,751 | 6,779,649 | $ | 767,575 | 8,953,813 | $ | 938,326 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate impairment losses | (985 | ) | (67,592 | ) | (68,577 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated total investment, net of real estate impairment losses | $ | 169,766 | $ | 699,983 | $ | 869,749 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Projects | 5 | 3 | 8 | 25 | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage | 37.2 | % | 100.0 | % | 49.3 | % | 96.3 | % | 87.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remainder to Invest | $ | 39,752 | $ | 23,725 | $ | 63,477 | $ | 19,384 | $ | 82,861 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Share of Remainder to Invest(2)(4)(5) | $ | 11,421 | $ | 23,725 | $ | 35,146 | $ | 19,277 | $ | 54,423 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield(2)(5) | 9.2 | % | 8.7 | % | 9.1 | % | 6.2 | % | 6.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield, net of real estate impairment losses(2) | 9.2 | % | 9.0 | % | 9.2 | % | 6.8 | % | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percent Pre-Leased(2) | 63.2 | % | 22.1 | % | 50.0 | % | 56.2 | % | 54.7 | % |
(1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | Includes value-added conversion projects. | |
(4) | Amounts include capitalized interest as applicable. | |
(5) | Calculated using estimated total investment before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 15 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Land,
Value-Added Conversion, and Redevelopment Inventory(1)(2) (dollars in thousands) |
The Americas | Europe | Asia | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acres | (Sq Ft) | Acres | (Sq Ft) | Acres | (Sq Ft) | Acres | (Sq Ft) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of September 30, 2010 |
2,306 | 38,596,354 | 227 | 4,620,004 | 130 | 4,852,918 | 2,663 | 48,069,276 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development starts |
(10 | ) | (221,233 | ) | | | (12 | ) | (474,534 | ) | (22 | ) | (695,767 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
2,296 | 38,375,121 | 227 | 4,620,004 | 118 | 4,378,384 | 2,641 | (3) | 47,373,509 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in Land(4) |
$ | 652,230 | $ | 150,863 | $ | 146,823 | $ | 949,916 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | (151,794 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in land, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | 798,122 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of investment in land, net of cumulative real estate
impairment losses |
$ | 382,758 | $ | 74,537 | $ | 144,095 | $ | 601,390 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Cost per SF |
$ | 4.32 | $ | 13.21 | $ | 28.09 | $ | 6.04 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Cost per Floor Area Ratio SF |
$ | 10.52 | $ | 28.77 | $ | 32.91 | $ | 14.05 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Purchase Date (in years) |
4.8 | 2.8 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
East Region | West Region | The Americas Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion Time Frame | Acres | Number of Projects |
Acres | Number of Projects |
Acres | Number of Projects |
||||||||||||||||||
3 years or less |
| | 9 | 1 | 9 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
3+ years |
7 | 2 | 231 | 13 | 238 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
7 | 2 | 240 | 14 | 247 | (5) | 16 | |||||||||||||||||
East Region | West Region | The Americas Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Redevelopment Time Frame | Sq Ft | Number of Projects |
Sq Ft | Number of Projects |
Sq Ft | Number of Projects |
||||||||||||||||||
3 years or less |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
3+ years |
| | 998,372 | 3 | 998,372 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
| | 998,372 | 3 | 998,372 | (6) | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
(1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(2) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. Does not include value-added acquisitions. | |
(3) | AMBs share of acres and square feet of estimated build out including amounts held in unconsolidated co-investment ventures is 2,278 acres and 40.9 million square feet, respectively. | |
(4) | Represents actual cost incurred to date including initial acquisition, infrastructure, and associated carry costs. | |
(5) | AMBs share is 193 acres. | |
(6) | AMBs share is 678,859 square feet. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 16 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Private Capital Co-investment Ventures Overview (dollars in millions) |
Date | Geographic | Functional | Incentive Distribution | |||||||||
Co-investment Venture | Established | Focus | Principal Venture Investors | Currency | Frequency | Term | ||||||
AMB-SGP |
March 2001 | United States | Subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd. | USD | 10 years | March 2011; extendable 10 years | ||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
June 2001 | United States | Various | USD | At dissolution | December 2014 (estimated) | ||||||
AMB-AMS |
June 2004 | United States | Various | USD | At dissolution | December 2012; extendable 4 years | ||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund(1) |
October 2004 | United States | Various | USD | 3 years (next 2Q11) | Open end | ||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
December 2004 | Mexico | Subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd. | USD | 7 years | December 2011; extendable 7 years | ||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
June 2005 | Japan | Various | JPY | At dissolution | June 2013; extendable 2 years | ||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
October 2006 | United States | Strategic Realty Ventures, LLC | USD | Upon project sales | Upon final sale(2) | ||||||
AMB Europe Logistics Fund(1) |
June 2007 | Europe | Various | EUR | 3 years (next 2Q13) | Open end | ||||||
AMB Mexico Fondo Logistico |
July 2010 | Mexico | Various | USD | At dissolution | July 2020 | ||||||
AMB Brazil Logistics Partners Fund I |
December 2010 | Brazil | Major university endowment | BRL | At dissolution | December 2017; extendable 2 years |
(1) | Effective January 1, 2010, the name of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III was changed to AMB U.S. Logistics Fund. Effective October 29, 2010, the name of AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS was changed to AMB Europe Logistics Fund, FCP-FIS. | |
(2) | For AMB DFS Fund I, the investment period ended in June 2009. The fund will terminate upon completion and disposition of assets currently owned and under development by the fund. | |
(3) | Additions to private capital co-investment ventures include both acquisitions from third parties as well as assets contributed to co-investment ventures from AMB. | |
(4) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 17 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Joint Ventures Financial Summary (dollars in thousands) |
|||
AMBs | Gross | AMBs | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ownership | Square | Book | Property | Other | Net Equity | Investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | Percentage | Feet(1) | Value | Debt | Debt | Investment(2) | Capacity | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Co-Investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund |
35% | 37,521,062 | $ | 3,422,176 | $ | 1,596,010 | $ | | $ | 374,881 | $ | 190,000 | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Europe Logistics Fund |
38% | 10,522,627 | 1,334,753 | 647,288 | | 172,903 | 300,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
20% | 7,263,093 | 1,720,824 | 929,158 | 9,857 | 82,482 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
22% | 6,405,922 | 360,410 | 163,769 | 148,438 | (3) | 20,646 | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Co-investment Ventures |
31% | 61,712,704 | 6,838,163 | 3,336,225 | 158,295 | 650,912 | 490,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Development Co-investment Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
15% | 200,027 | 86,022 | | | 14,426 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund |
35% | 557,915 | 98,829 | | | 34,496 | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Brazil Logistics Partners Fund I(4) |
25% | 639,264 | 54,838 | | | 32,910 | 390,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Development Co-investment Ventures |
25% | 1,397,206 | 239,689 | | | 81,832 | 390,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Co-investment Ventures(5) |
31% | 63,109,910 | 7,077,852 | 3,336,225 | 158,295 | 732,744 | 880,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
51% | 7,419,049 | (6) | 287,932 | 153,513 | | 51,043 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
32% | 70,528,959 | $ | 7,365,784 | $ | 3,489,738 | $ | 158,295 | $ | 783,787 | $ | 880,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
50% | 8,216,247 | $ | 479,635 | $ | 327,301 | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
24% | 7,321,372 | 518,516 | 184,292 | 54,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
39% | 2,170,337 | 160,985 | 75,650 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Co-investment Ventures |
37% | 17,707,956 | 1,159,136 | 587,243 | 54,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Co-investment Ventures |
37% | 17,707,956 | 1,159,136 | 587,243 | 54,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
80% | 2,917,634 | 372,536 | 62,210 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Development Joint Ventures |
48% | 249,169 | 181,600 | 81,776 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Joint Ventures |
48% | 20,874,759 | $ | 1,713,272 | $ | 731,229 | $ | 54,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Selected Operating Results | FFO, as | FFO, as | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2010 | Cash NOI(5) | Net Income | adjusted(5) | Share of | Cash NOI(5) | Net Income | adjusted(5) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 103,278 | $ | 5,516 | (7) | $ | 46,959 | (7) | AMBs | $ | 33,512 | $ | 4,956 | $ | 16,070 | |||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 23,865 | $ | 4,677 | $ | 14,708 | Partner's | $ | 12,909 | $ | 2,821 | $ | 7,454 | |||||||||||||||
Selected Operating Results | FFO, as | FFO, as | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Years Ended December 31, 2010 | Cash NOI(5) | Net Income | adjusted(5) | Share of | Cash NOI(5) | Net Income | adjusted(5) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 392,973 | $ | 16,088 | (7) | $ | 182,736 | (7) | AMBs | $ | 120,500 | $ | 17,372 | $ | 61,903 | |||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 95,623 | $ | 15,777 | $ | 57,469 | Partner's | $ | 52,034 | $ | 8,508 | $ | 28,251 |
(1) | For development properties, represents the estimated square feet upon completion for the committed phases of development projects. | |
(2) | Through AMB Property Mexico, AMB held an equity interest in various other non-core unconsolidated ventures for approximately $13.3 million as of December 31, 2010. Additionally, in December 2010, AMB entered into a mortgage debt investment joint venture with a third-party and held an equity interest of $86.2 million as of December 31, 2010. | |
(3) | Includes $89.6 million of shareholder loans. | |
(4) | Through AMB Brazil Logistics Partners Fund I, a 50% co-investment venture with a third-party partner, AMB holds a 25% equity interest in a joint venture created with its partner Cyrela Commercial Properties. | |
(5) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(6) | Includes investments in 7.3 million square feet of operating properties through AMBs investment in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage which it excludes from its owned and managed portfolio. | |
(7) | Includes $4.0 million and $15.5 million of interest expense on shareholder loans for AMB-SGP Mexico for the quarter and twelve months ended December 31, 2010, respectively. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 18 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Capitalization
Summary (dollars in millions) |
|||
For the Quarter Ended | For the Year Ended | |||||||
December 31, 2010 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Wholly-owned fixed charge coverage(2) |
2.5 | x | 2.5 | x | ||||
Fixed charge coverage(2) |
2.1 | x | 2.1 | x | ||||
Interest coverage(2) |
2.6 | x | 2.6 | x | ||||
Dividends per share-to-FFO, as adjusted per share(2) |
84.8 | % | 88.2 | % | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization(2) |
41.3 | % | 41.3 | % | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets(2) |
43.0 | % | 43.0 | % |
(1) | Debt amounts represent AMBs share of debt and preferred securities. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | Includes $600 million of estimated investment capacity in AMB Mexico Fondo Logistico. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 19 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Capitalization Detail (dollars in thousands, except shares and share price) |
|||
AMB Wholly-Owned | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unsecured | Total | Consolidated | Total | Unconsolidated | AMBs Share of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior | Credit | Other | Secured | Wholly-Owned | Joint Venture | Consolidated | Joint | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt | Facilities(1) | Debt | Debt | Debt | Debt | Debt | Venture Debt | Debt | Debt | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
$ | 69,000 | $ | 129,443 | $ | | $ | 15,499 | $ | 213,942 | $ | 139,410 | $ | 353,352 | $ | 414,907 | $ | 768,259 | $ | 395,844 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
| | 153,903 | 29,636 | 183,539 | 468,361 | 651,900 | 434,468 | 1,086,368 | 478,649 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
293,897 | | | 23,366 | 317,263 | 103,568 | 420,831 | 732,130 | 1,152,961 | 547,092 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
| 139,490 | | 4,904 | 144,394 | 8,809 | 153,203 | 556,096 | 709,299 | 357,254 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
112,491 | | 205,773 | 7,908 | 326,172 | 16,943 | 343,115 | 464,706 | 807,821 | 504,984 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
250,000 | | | 81,936 | 331,936 | 15,499 | 347,435 | 170,709 | 518,144 | 397,384 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
300,000 | | | 67,913 | 367,913 | 490 | 368,403 | 92,414 | 460,817 | 388,927 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
300,000 | | | | 300,000 | 595 | 300,595 | 96,694 | 397,289 | 334,094 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 |
250,000 | | | | 250,000 | 28,713 | 278,713 | 11,778 | 290,491 | 270,707 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 |
123,213 | | | | 123,213 | 645 | 123,858 | 211,643 | 335,501 | 197,459 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
| | | | | 2,450 | 2,450 | 377,455 | 379,905 | 133,164 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 1,698,601 | $ | 268,933 | $ | 359,676 | $ | 231,162 | $ | 2,558,372 | $ | 785,483 | $ | 3,343,855 | $ | 3,563,000 | $ | 6,906,855 | $ | 4,005,558 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized net (discounts) premiums |
(12,645 | ) | | | 43 | (12,602 | ) | 46 | (12,556 | ) | (4,580 | ) | (17,136 | ) | (15,995 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 1,685,956 | $ | 268,933 | $ | 359,676 | $ | 231,205 | $ | 2,545,770 | $ | 785,529 | $ | 3,331,299 | $ | 3,558,420 | $ | 6,889,719 | $ | 3,989,563 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of debt(2) |
| | | | | (451,335 | ) | (451,335 | ) | (2,448,821 | ) | (2,900,156 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of total debt(2) |
$ | 1,685,956 | $ | 268,933 | $ | 359,676 | $ | 231,205 | $ | 2,545,770 | $ | 334,194 | $ | 2,879,964 | $ | 1,109,599 | $ | 3,989,563 | $ | 3,989,563 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate |
5.6 | % | 1.7 | % | 3.0 | % | 2.9 | % | 4.6 | % | 4.8 | % | 4.6 | % | 4.6 | % | 4.6 | % | 4.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average remaining maturity (years) |
6.1 | 1.9 | 3.6 | 4.9 | 5.2 | 1.9 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Market Equity | ||||||||||||
Security | Shares | Price | Value | |||||||||
Common Stock |
168,736,081 | (3) | $ | 31.71 | $ | 5,350,621 | ||||||
LP Units |
3,041,743 | $ | 31.71 | 96,454 | ||||||||
Total |
171,777,824 | $ | 5,447,075 | |||||||||
Total options outstanding |
8,694,938 | |||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock options on net income
per common share(4) |
| |||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock options on FFO, as adjusted and Core
FFO, as adjusted per common share and unit(4) |
1,329,986 |
Preferred Stock | ||||||||
Dividend | Liquidation | |||||||
Security | Rate | Preference | ||||||
Series L preferred stock |
6.50 | % | $ | 50,000 | ||||
Series M preferred stock |
6.75 | % | 57,500 | |||||
Series O preferred stock |
7.00 | % | 75,000 | |||||
Series P preferred stock |
6.85 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Weighted Average/Total |
6.80 | % | $ | 232,500 | ||||
Capitalization Ratios | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization(2)(5) |
41.3 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-
AMBs share of total market capitalization(2)(5) |
43.7 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets(2) |
43.0 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-
AMBs share of total assets(2) |
45.5 | % |
(1) | Represents three credit facilities with total capacity of approximately $1.7 billion. Includes $37.0 million in U.S. dollar borrowings and $139.5 million, $70.1 million and $22.3 million in Yen, Canadian dollar and Singapore dollar-based borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2010, respectively, translated to U.S. dollars using the foreign exchange rates in effect on December 31, 2010. | |
(2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(3) | Includes 1,202,122 shares of unvested restricted stock. | |
(4) | Computed using the treasury stock method and average share price of $29.23 for the quarter ended December 31, 2010. For net income per common share, all stock options were anti-dilutive as of December 31, 2010. | |
(5) | Total Market Capitalization is defined as AMBs share of total debt plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 20 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Debt Maturities(1) (dollars in thousands) |
|||
After Extension Options(2) | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Wholly-Owned Debt | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
Unsecured Senior Debt |
$ | 69,000 | $ | | $ | 293,897 | $ | | ||||||||
Credit Facilities |
| 129,443 | | | ||||||||||||
Other Debt |
| 153,903 | | | ||||||||||||
AMB Secured Debt |
14,300 | 28,068 | 22,090 | | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
83,300 | 311,414 | 315,987 | | ||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
| | 39,273 | | ||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
| 3,850 | 199,972 | 4,590 | ||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
38,176 | 289,125 | | | ||||||||||||
Other Industrial Joint Ventures |
53,311 | 30,972 | 20,355 | 4,344 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
91,487 | 323,947 | 259,600 | 8,934 | ||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
58,825 | 163,769 | | | ||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
151,511 | 212,617 | 493,566 | | ||||||||||||
AMB Europe Logistics Fund |
| | | 412,234 | ||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund |
30,310 | 29,397 | 181,457 | 117,995 | ||||||||||||
Other Industrial Joint Ventures |
31,081 | | 57,299 | 30,861 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
271,727 | 405,783 | 732,322 | 561,090 | ||||||||||||
Total Consolidated |
174,787 | 635,361 | 575,587 | 8,934 | ||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated |
271,727 | 405,783 | 732,322 | 561,090 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 446,514 | $ | 1,041,144 | $ | 1,307,909 | $ | 570,024 | ||||||||
Total AMBs Share |
$ | 201,771 | $ | 563,687 | $ | 580,546 | $ | 215,449 |
(1) | Excludes scheduled principal amortization of debt maturing in years subsequent to 2014 as well as debt premiums and discounts. | |
(2) | Subject to certain conditions. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 21 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Supplemental Information for Net Asset Value Analysis (NAV) (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | |||
Actual | ||||||||
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||
Real Estate: |
||||||||
Wholly-owned property cash NOI from continuing operations(1) |
$ | 80,525 | ||||||
AMBs share of cash NOI from joint ventures: |
||||||||
Total cash NOI from joint ventures from continuing operations(1) |
$ | 127,157 | ||||||
AMBs share of joint ventures(1) |
34.9 | % | ||||||
AMBs share of cash NOI from joint ventures from continuing operations(1) |
44,437 | |||||||
Adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI: |
||||||||
NOI attributed to construction-in-progress |
$ | (178 | ) | |||||
NOI attributed to pre-stabilized development projects(1)(2) |
(4,173 | ) | ||||||
NOI attributed to contributed developments |
| |||||||
NOI required to stabilize properties acquired and moved to operations |
962 | |||||||
Other adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI:(3) |
5,912 | |||||||
Adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI(4) |
2,523 | |||||||
Total AMBs share of cash NOI from continuing operations
related to operating properties(1)(5) |
$ | 127,485 | ||||||
AMBs share of average occupancy(5) |
92.3 | % | ||||||
Development platform:(4) |
||||||||
Development starts |
$ | 32,889 | ||||||
Private capital platform: |
||||||||
Total private capital revenue per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.05 |
As of | ||||
AMB's share of:(1) | December 31, 2010 | |||
Development, land, value-added acquisitions and contributed
assets, net of real estate impairment losses:(5) |
||||
Construction-in-progress (invested to date) |
$ | 48,101 | ||
Pre-stabilized development projects (invested to date)(1) |
652,339 | |||
Value-added acquisitions(1) |
35,947 | |||
Land held for future development |
601,390 | |||
Assets contributed to co-investment ventures(6) |
| |||
Total development, land, value-added acquisitions and
contributed assets, net of real estate impairment losses |
$ | 1,337,777 | ||
Debt and preferred securities:(5) |
||||
Total debt |
$ | 3,989,563 | ||
Preferred securities |
232,500 | |||
Total debt and preferred securities |
$ | 4,222,063 | ||
Other balance sheet items:(5) |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
$ | 308,427 | ||
Accounts receivable (net) and other assets |
401,785 | |||
Deferred rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net) |
(125,373 | ) | ||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
(388,100 | ) | ||
Total other balance sheet items |
$ | 196,739 | ||
(1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
(2) | Includes an adjustment to remove any NOI generated from value-added acquisitions. | |
(3) | Other adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI include free rent granted in the quarter and non-property related revenues and expenses. | |
(4) | Transaction activity adjustments remove NOI generated from in-progress developments, contributed developments, and projects held for sale or contribution as the value of this real estate is reflected in AMBs share of development, land, and contributed assets as detailed above. The adjustments also include stabilized NOI for acquisitions. | |
(5) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated joint ventures. | |
(6) | Represents AMBs share of assets contributed to unconsolidated co-investment ventures during the three months ended December 31, 2010. |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 22 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures | |||
Acquisition Cost includes estimated acquisition capital expenditures. Estimated
acquisition capital expenditures include immediate building improvements that are
taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase of a building or which are
incurred to bring a building up to operating standard or to stabilization and
incremental building improvements and leasing costs that are incurred in an effort to
substantially increase the revenue potential of an existing building.
Adjusted EBITDA, Wholly-owned Adjusted EBITDA and AMBs share of Adjusted EBITDA. AMB
uses adjusted earnings before interest (including the amount of capitalized interest
deducted from the determination of development gains), tax, depreciation and
amortization, impairment charges, development profits related to real estate
impairment losses previously recognized, restructuring, losses on early
extinguishment of debt, stock based compensation amortization and other non-cash
charges, and non-development gains, or adjusted EBITDA, to measure both its operating
performance and liquidity. AMB considers adjusted EBITDA to provide investors
relevant and useful information because it permits investors to view income from its
operations on an unleveraged basis before the effects of tax, non-cash depreciation
and amortization expense (including stock-based compensation amortization) or
non-development gains. By excluding interest expense, adjusted EBITDA allows
investors to measure AMBs operating performance independent of its capital structure
and indebtedness and, therefore, allows for a more meaningful comparison of its
operating performance between quarters as well as annual periods and to compare its
operating performance to that of other companies, both in the real estate industry
and in other industries. AMB considers adjusted EBITDA to be a useful supplemental
measure for reviewing its comparative performance with other companies because, by
excluding non-cash depreciation and amortization expense, adjusted EBITDA can help
the investing public compare the performance of a real estate company to that of
companies in other industries. The impairment charges were principally a result of
increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in market conditions
that adversely impacted values. The development profits related to real estate
impairment losses previously recognized reflect adjustments to the cost basis of
properties previously impaired used to determine profits on disposition. The
restructuring charges reflected costs associated with AMBs reduction in global
headcount and cost structure. Debt extinguishment losses generally included the costs
of repurchasing debt securities. AMB repurchased certain tranches of senior unsecured
debt to manage its debt maturities in response to the current financing environment,
resulting in greater debt extinguishment costs. Although difficult to predict, these
items may be recurring given the uncertainty of the current economic climate and its
adverse effects on the real estate and financial markets. While not infrequent or
unusual in nature, these items result from market fluctuations that can have
inconsistent effects on AMBs results of operation. The economics underlying these
items reflect market and financing conditions in the short-term but can obscure AMBs
performance and the value of AMBs long-term investment decisions and strategies.
Management believes adjusted EBITDA is significant and useful to both it and its
investors. Adjusted EBITDA more appropriately reflects the value and strength of
AMBs business model and its potential performance isolated from the volatility of
the current economic environment and unobscured by costs (or gains) resulting from
AMBs management of its financing profile in response to the tightening of the
capital markets. As a liquidity measure, AMB believes that adjusted EBITDA helps
investors to analyze its ability to meet debt service obligations and to make
quarterly preferred share dividends and unit distributions. Management uses adjusted
EBITDA when measuring AMBs operating performance and liquidity; specifically when
assessing its operating performance, and comparing that performance to other
companies, both in the real estate industry and in other industries, and when
evaluating its ability to meet debt service obligations and to make quarterly
preferred share dividends and unit distributions. AMB believes investors should
consider adjusted EBITDA, in conjunction with net income (the primary measure of
AMBs performance) and the other required GAAP measures of its performance and
liquidity, to improve their understanding of AMBs operating results and liquidity,
and to make more meaningful comparisons of its performance between periods and as
against other companies. By excluding interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization,
impairment charges, development profits related to real estate impairment losses
previously recognized, restructuring, debt extinguishment losses, stock based
compensation amortization and other non-cash charges and non-development gains when
assessing AMBs financial performance, an investor is assessing the earnings
generated by AMBs operations, but not taking into account the eliminated expenses or
non-development gains incurred in connection with such operations. As a result,
adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should be used in
conjunction with AMBs required GAAP presentations. Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect
AMBs historical cash expenditures or future cash requirements for working capital,
capital expenditures or contractual commitments. Adjusted EBITDA also does not
reflect the cash required to make interest and principal payments on AMBs
outstanding debt. While adjusted EBITDA is a relevant and widely used measure of
operating performance and liquidity, it does not represent net income or cash flow
from operations as defined by GAAP and it should not be considered as an alternative
to those indicators in evaluating operating performance or liquidity. Further, AMBs
computation of adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by other
companies. Management compensates for the limitations of
adjusted EBITDA by providing investors with financial statements prepared according
to U.S. GAAP, along with this detailed discussion of adjusted EBITDA and a
reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income (or loss), a U.S. GAAP measurement.
AMB defines AMBs share of adjusted EBITDA to be AMB Property Corporations pro
rata portion of adjusted EBITDA based on its direct or indirect percentage of
equity interests in its joint ventures and other investments. AMB defines
wholly-owned adjusted EBITDA to be that portion of adjusted EBITDA, which is solely
attributable to assets and activities that are 100% directly or indirectly owned by
AMB Property Corporation plus cash distributions from joint venture relationships.
AMB includes these distributions as they are an additional source of cash flow
available to service AMBs obligations. AMB believes these supplemental measures
are useful by providing investors with more comprehensive disclosure regarding
AMBs performance and its ability to cover its financial obligations on both a
wholly owned basis and on a total portfolio basis.
The following table reconciles adjusted EBITDA, wholly-owned adjusted EBITDA and
AMBs share of adjusted EBITDA from net loss for the three and twelve months ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
For the Quarters Ended | For the Years Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 11,309 | $ | (10,102 | ) | $ | 33,594 | $ | (27,960 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
51,353 | 50,718 | 196,636 | 175,334 | ||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
| | | 181,853 | ||||||||||||
Real estate impairment losses included in development profits, net of taxes |
(3,114 | ) | | (3,620 | ) | (16,753 | ) | |||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 2,544 | 4,874 | 6,368 | ||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
353 | 11,614 | 2,892 | 12,267 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation amortization and other non-cash charges |
6,272 | 6,754 | 24,971 | 23,819 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
33,036 | 30,772 | 130,338 | 118,867 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations, including gains, excluding development profits |
(5,698 | ) | (2,938 | ) | (24,242 | ) | (43,220 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustment for depreciation on development profits |
| | (1,546 | ) | | |||||||||||
Income tax expense |
2,144 | 1,683 | 5,308 | 6,983 | ||||||||||||
Capitalized interest attributable to development properties sold or contributed |
1,101 | 1,691 | 4,649 | 16,412 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations adjusted EBITDA |
1,246 | 2,560 | 7,490 | 21,540 | ||||||||||||
Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
(4,956 | ) | (3,824 | ) | (17,372 | ) | (11,331 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Adjusted EBITDA attributable to consolidated joint ventures |
(23,731 | ) | (25,931 | ) | (98,243 | ) | (106,904 | ) | ||||||||
Distributions from consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures |
10,209 | 8,793 | 40,388 | 31,870 | ||||||||||||
Wholly-owned adjusted EBITDA |
79,524 | 74,334 | 306,117 | 389,145 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to derive adjusted EBITDA from consolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
Distributions from consolidated joint ventures to AMB |
(2,830 | ) | (4,338 | ) | (15,704 | ) | (20,183 | ) | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to consolidated joint ventures |
23,731 | 25,931 | 98,243 | 106,904 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(12,813 | ) | (14,256 | ) | (53,279 | ) | (58,801 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures to AMB |
(7,379 | ) | (4,455 | ) | (24,684 | ) | (11,687 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO, as adjusted |
16,070 | 12,549 | 61,903 | 47,549 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense |
15,318 | 10,713 | 54,850 | 40,473 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 111,621 | $ | 100,478 | $ | 427,446 | $ | 493,400 | ||||||||
Allocation to participating securities. On the Consolidated Statements of
Operations, this represents net income attributable to AMB Property Corporation, net
of preferred stock dividends, allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares.
On the Consolidated Statements of Fund from Operations, this represents FFO
allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares. For the three and twelve months
ended December 31, 2010, there were 1,202 unvested restricted shares outstanding (in
thousands). For the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2009, there were 920
unvested restricted shares outstanding (in thousands).
AMBs share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the pro-rata
portion of the applicable financial measure based on AMBs percentage of equity
interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment ventures
accounted for in the applicable financial measure. AMB believes that AMBs share
of calculations are meaningful and useful supplemental measures, which enable both
management and investors to assess the operations, earnings and growth of AMB in
light of AMBs ownership interest in its joint ventures and to compare the
applicable measure to that of other companies. In addition, it allows for a more
meaningful comparison of the applicable measure to that of other companies that do
not consolidate any of their joint ventures. AMBs share of calculations are not
intended to reflect actual liability should there be a default under loans or a
liquidation of the joint ventures. AMBs computation of AMBs share of measures
may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use
different methodologies for calculating these measures.
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 23 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter
Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures | |||
AMBs share of Other Balance Sheet Items. AMB believes that balance sheet information based on GAAP
provides the most appropriate information about financial position. However, AMB considers balance
sheet information reported on an owned and managed basis (such as AMBs share of cash and cash
equivalents and restricted cash, AMBs share of accounts receivable (net) and other assets, AMBs
share of deferred rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net), and AMBs share of accounts
payable and other liabilities) to be useful supplemental measures to help the investors better
understand AMBs operating performance. See Reporting Definitions for definitions of owned and
managed and AMBs share of. AMB believes that AMBs share of balance sheet items on an owned and
managed basis helps management and investors make a comprehensive assessment of AMBs total real
estate portfolio and provides a better understanding of AMBs operating activities. While such
information is helpful to the investor, it does not provide balance sheet information as defined by
GAAP and is not a true alternative to such GAAP measurements. Further, AMBs computation of its
share of balance sheet items on an owned and managed basis may not be comparable to that of other
real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating these measures.
AMBs share of total debt. AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the total debt
based on its percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated joint
ventures holding the debt. AMB believes that its share of total debt is a meaningful supplemental
measure, which enables both management and investors to analyze its leverage and to compare its
leverage to that of other companies. In addition, it allows for a more meaningful comparison of its
debt to that of other companies that do not consolidate their joint ventures. AMBs share of total
debt is not intended to reflect its actual liability should there be a default under any or all of
such loans or a liquidation of the joint ventures. See Capitalization Detail for a reconciliation
of total debt and AMBs share of total debt.
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets is calculated using the following
definitions: AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the total debt based on AMBs
percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding
the debt. AMBs share of total assets is the pro rata portion of total gross book value of assets
based on AMBs percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated joint
ventures holding the assets.
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization is calculated using the following
definitions: AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the total debt based on AMBs
percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding
the debt. AMBs definition of total market capitalization is AMBs share of total debt plus
preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. AMBs definition of market equity is
the total number of outstanding shares of AMBs common stock and common limited partnership units
multiplied by the closing price per share of its common stock as of the period end.
Annualized base rent (ABR) is calculated as monthly base rent (cash basis) per the lease, as of a
certain date, multiplied by 12. If free rent is granted, then the first positive rent value is
used. Leases denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the currency exchange rate at
period end.
Assets Under Management is AMBs estimate of the value of the real estate it wholly owns or manages
through its consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment ventures or for clients of AMB Capital
Partners. Assets under management is calculated by adding the co-investment venture partners or
clients share of the carrying value of its real estate investment to AMBs share of total market
capitalization.
Average occupancy percentage represents the daily weighted occupancy of the total rentable square
feet leased, including month-to-month leases, divided by total rentable square feet. Space is
considered leased when the tenant has either taken physical or economic occupancy.
Carrying value is the sum of the most recent valuation of real estate investments plus subsequently
incurred capital expenditures. Generally, each real estate investment is valued once a year.
Cash-basis NOI. Cash-basis NOI is defined as NOI less straight line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles.
AMB considers cash-basis NOI to be an appropriate and useful supplemental performance measure
because cash basis NOI reflects the operating performance of the real estate portfolio excluding
the effects of non-cash adjustments and provides a better measure of actual cash basis rental
growth for a year-over-year comparison. However, cash-basis NOI should not be viewed as an
alternative measure of financial performance since it does not reflect general and administrative
expenses, interest expenses, depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and leasing
costs, or trends in development and construction activities that could materially impact results
from operations. Further, cash-basis NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate
investment trusts, as they may use different methodologies for calculating cash-basis NOI.
For a reconciliation of NOI from net income for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, refer to the
SS NOI definition. The following table reconciles AMB s share of cash-basis NOI from NOI for the
quarter ended December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
For the Quarter Ended | ||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||
NOI |
$ | 109,598 | ||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
(5,253 | ) | ||
Consolidated joint venture cash NOI from continuing operations |
(23,820 | ) | ||
Wholly-owned property cash NOI |
80,525 | |||
AMBs share of consolidated joint venture cash NOI |
10,945 | |||
AMBs share of unconsolidated joint venture cash NOI |
33,492 | |||
AMBs share of transaction adjustments |
2,523 | |||
AMBs share of cash-basis NOI |
$ | 127,485 | ||
Co-investment Ventures are Joint Ventures with institutional investors, managed by AMB from
which AMB receives acquisition fees for third-party acquisitions, portfolio and asset management
distributions or fees, as well as incentive distributions or promoted interests.
Co-investment venture operating results.
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs | Property | (Loss) from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ownership | Operating | Continuing | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage | Revenues | Expenses | Operations | Income (Loss) | Cash NOI | FFO | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund |
35 | % | $ | 71,549 | $ | (18,418 | ) | $ | 6,206 | $ | 6,572 | $ | 50,211 | $ | 27,147 | |||||||||||||
AMB Europe Logistics Fund |
38 | % | 25,412 | (5,668 | ) | (3,173 | ) | (3,173 | ) | 19,195 | 4,281 | |||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
20 | % | 28,918 | (6,506 | ) | 4,931 | 4,931 | 22,052 | 12,992 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
22 | % | 6,503 | (735 | ) | (4,336 | ) (1) | (4,336 | ) (1) | 5,712 | (1,298 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
15 | % | 2 | (429 | ) | (536 | ) | 536 | (427 | ) | (444 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Brazil Logistics Partners Fund I |
25 | % | 199 | | (122 | ) | (122 | ) | 199 | (122 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
50 | % | 10,085 | (3,314 | ) | (737 | ) | (720 | ) | 6,799 | 2,145 | |||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
24 | % | 13,159 | (2,975 | ) | 3,550 | 3,550 | 9,940 | 6,824 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
39 | % | 3,932 | (1,073 | ) | 552 | 552 | 2,768 | 1,613 |
(1) | Includes $4.0 million of interest expense on loans from co-investment venture partners. |
Co-investment venture partners share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the
pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based on AMBs co-investment venture partners
percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated co-investment ventures
accounted for in the applicable financial measure.
Co-investment venture partners (or co-investors) share of debt is the co-investment venture
partners pro-rata portion of total debt.
Co-investment venture partners (or co-investors) share of equity is the pro-rata portion of the
co-investment venture partners share of carrying value less the co-investment venture partners
share of debt.
Completion is generally defined as properties that have reached Stabilization or properties that
have been substantially complete for at least 12 months.
Development activities include ground-up development, redevelopments, land sales and value-added
conversions.
Development margin is calculated as contribution value or disposition price less closing costs,
minus estimated total investment, before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses,
and any deferred rents, taxes or third party promotes before any deferrals on contributions,
divided by the estimated total investment, before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment
losses.
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 24 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter
Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures | |||
Estimated FFO, as adjusted, by Business. Estimated FFO, as adjusted, by Business is FFO, as
adjusted generated by AMBs Real Estate Operations, Development and Private Capital business.
Estimated Development and Private Capital FFO, as adjusted, was determined by reducing Development
Profits, net of taxes, and Private Capital revenues by their respective estimated share of general
and administrative expenses, also defined as overhead. Developments and Private Capitals
estimated allocation of total general and administrative expenses was based on their respective
percentage of actual direct general and administrative expenses incurred. Estimated Real Estate
Operations FFO, as adjusted represents total AMB FFO, as adjusted, less estimated FFO, as adjusted,
attributable to Development and Private Capital. Management believes estimated FFO, as adjusted, by
business line is a useful supplemental measure of its operating performance because it helps the
investing public compare the operating performance of AMB s respective businesses to other
companies comparable businesses. Further, AMBs computation of FFO, as adjusted, by business line
may not be comparable to that reported by other real estate investment trusts as they may use
different methodologies in computing such measures.
Estimated investment capacity is AMBs estimate of the gross real estate which could be acquired
through the use of its equity commitments from co-investment venture partners plus AMBs funding
obligations and estimated debt capitalization.
Estimated total investment represents total estimated cost of development, expansion, including
initial acquisition costs, prepaid ground leases, buildings, and associated carry costs. Estimated
total investments are based on current forecasts and are subject to change. Non-U.S. Dollar
investments are translated to U.S. Dollars using the exchange rate at period end.
Estimated yields on development projects are calculated from estimated annual cash NOI following
occupancy stabilization divided by the estimated total investment. Yields exclude value added
conversion projects and are calculated on an after-tax basis for international projects.
Fixed charge coverage. Fixed charge coverage is defined as Adjusted EBITDA divided by fixed
charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense less joint venture partners share of interest
expense and amortization of finance costs and debt premiums, from continuing and discontinued
operations, plus AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint venture debt,
capitalized interest, preferred unit distributions and preferred stock dividends. AMB uses fixed
charge coverage to measure its liquidity. AMB believes fixed charge coverage is relevant and useful
to investors because it permits fixed income investors to measure AMBs ability to meet its
interest payments on outstanding debt, make distributions to its preferred unitholders and pay
dividends to its preferred shareholders. AMBs computation of fixed charge coverage may not be
comparable to fixed charge coverage reported by other companies.
The following table details the calculation of fixed charges for three and twelve months ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
For the Quarters Ended | For the Years Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
Fixed charge | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 33,036 | $ | 30,772 | $ | 130,338 | $ | 118,867 | ||||||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums continuing operations |
(2,789 | ) | (3,045 | ) | (11,542 | ) | (11,691 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
(16 | ) | (6 | ) | 49 | (824 | ) | |||||||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums discontinued operations |
16 | (3 | ) | (11 | ) | (8 | ) | |||||||||
Capitalized interest |
8,569 | 9,792 | 35,177 | 44,869 | ||||||||||||
Preferred unit distributions |
| | | 4,295 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
3,950 | 3,950 | 15,806 | 15,806 | ||||||||||||
Less: Fixed charge attributable to consolidated joint ventures |
(11,128 | ) | (13,234 | ) | (47,428 | ) | (52,332 | ) | ||||||||
Wholly-owned fixed charge |
31,638 | 28,226 | 122,389 | 118,982 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to derive fixed charge from consolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed charge attributable to consolidated joint ventures |
11,128 | 13,234 | 47,428 | 52,332 | ||||||||||||
Fixed charge attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(5,865 | ) | (7,425 | ) | (25,388 | ) | (29,621 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive fixed charge from unconsolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of capitalized interest from unconsolidated joint ventures |
439 | 233 | 1,376 | 780 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint ventures |
15,318 | 10,713 | 54,850 | 40,473 | ||||||||||||
Total fixed charge |
$ | 52,658 | $ | 44,981 | $ | 200,655 | $ | 182,946 | ||||||||
Funds From Operations, as adjusted (FFO, as adjusted), Funds From Operations Per Share and
Unit, as adjusted (FFOPS, as adjusted), Core FFO, as adjusted and Core FFO Per Share and Unit, as
adjusted (Core FFOPS, as adjusted) (together with FFO, as adjusted, FFOPS, as adjusted, Core FFO,
as adjusted and Core FFOPS, as adjusted, the FFO Measures, as adjusted). AMB believes that net
income, as defined by U.S. GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, AMB considers
funds from operations, as adjusted (or FFO, as adjusted), FFO per share and unit, as adjusted (or
FFOPS, as adjusted), Core FFO, as adjusted and Core FFO per share and unit, as adjusted (or Core
FFOPS, as adjusted) to be useful supplemental measures of its operating performance. AMB defines
FFOPS, as adjusted, as FFO, as adjusted, per fully diluted weighted average share of AMBs common
stock and operating partnership units. AMB calculates FFO, as adjusted, as net income (or loss)
available to common stockholders, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, less gains (or losses)
from dispositions of real estate held for investment purposes and real estate-related depreciation,
and adjustments to derive AMBs pro rata share of FFO, as adjusted, of consolidated and
unconsolidated joint ventures. AMB defines Core FFOPS, as adjusted as Core FFO, as adjusted per
fully diluted weighted share of AMBs common stock and operating partnership units. AMB calculates
Core FFO, as adjusted as FFO, as adjusted excluding AMBs share of development profits. These
calculations also include adjustments for items as described below.
Unless stated otherwise, AMB includes the gains from development, including those from value-added
conversion projects, before depreciation recapture, as a component of FFO, as adjusted. AMB
believes gains from development should be included in FFO, as adjusted, to more completely reflect
the performance of one of our lines of business. AMB believes that value-added conversion
dispositions are in substance land sales and as such should be included in FFO, as adjusted,
consistent with the real estate investment trust industrys long standing practice to include gains
on the sale of land in funds from operations. However, AMBs interpretation of FFO, as adjusted, or
FFOPS, as adjusted, may not be consistent with the views of others in the real estate investment
trust industry, who may consider it to be a divergence from the NAREIT definition, and may not be
comparable to funds from operations or funds from operations per share and unit reported by other
real estate investment trusts that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than AMB
does. In connection with the formation of a joint venture, AMB may warehouse assets that are
acquired with the intent to contribute these assets to the newly formed venture. Some of the
properties held for contribution may, under certain circumstances, be required to be depreciated
under U.S. GAAP. If this circumstance arises, AMB intends to include in its calculation of FFO, as
adjusted, gains or losses related to the contribution of previously depreciated real estate to
joint ventures. Although such a change, if instituted, will be a departure from the current NAREIT
definition, AMB believes such calculation of FFO, as adjusted, will better reflect the value
created as a result of the contributions. To date, AMB has not included gains or losses from the
contribution of previously depreciated warehoused assets in FFO, as adjusted.
In addition, AMB calculates FFO, as adjusted, to exclude impairment and restructuring charges, debt
extinguishment losses and the Series D preferred unit redemption discount. The impairment charges
were principally a result of increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in
market conditions that adversely impacted values. The restructuring charges reflected costs
associated with AMBs reduction in global headcount and cost structure. Debt extinguishment losses
generally included the costs of repurchasing debt securities. AMB repurchased certain tranches of
senior unsecured debt to manage its debt maturities in response to the current financing
environment, resulting in greater debt extinguishment costs. The Series D preferred unit redemption
discount reflects the gain associated with the discount to liquidation preference in the Series D
preferred unit redemption price less costs incurred as a result of the redemption. Although
difficult to predict, these items may be recurring given the uncertainty of the current economic
climate and its adverse effects on the real estate and financial markets. While not infrequent or
unusual in nature, these items result from market fluctuations that can have inconsistent effects
on AMBs results of operations. The economics underlying these items reflect market and financing
conditions in the short-term but can obscure AMBs performance and the value of AMBs long-term
investment decisions and strategies. Management believes FFO, as adjusted, is significant and
useful to both it and its investors. FFO, as adjusted, more appropriately reflects the value and
strength of AMBs business model and its potential performance isolated from the volatility of the
current economic environment and unobscured by costs (or gains) resulting from AMBs management of
its financing profile in response to the tightening of the capital markets. However, in addition to
the limitations of FFO Measures, as adjusted, generally discussed below, FFO, as adjusted, does not
present a comprehensive measure of AMBs financial condition and operating performance. This
measure is a modification of the NAREIT definition of funds from operations and should not be used
as an alternative to net
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 25 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter
Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures | |||
income or cash as defined by U.S. GAAP.
AMB believes that the FFO Measures, as adjusted, are meaningful supplemental measures of its
operating performance because historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with
U.S. GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time,
as reflected through depreciation and amortization expenses. However, since real estate values have
historically risen or fallen with market and other conditions, many industry investors and analysts
have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical
cost accounting to be insufficient. Thus, the FFO Measures, as adjusted, are supplemental measures
of operating performance for real estate investment trusts that exclude historical cost
depreciation and amortization, among other items, from net income available to common stockholders,
as defined by U.S. GAAP. AMB believes that the use of the FFO Measures, as adjusted, combined with
the required U.S. GAAP presentations, has been beneficial in improving the understanding of
operating results of real estate investment trusts among the investing public and making
comparisons of operating results among such companies more meaningful. AMB considers the FFO
Measures, as adjusted, to be useful measures for reviewing comparative operating and financial
performance because, by excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously depreciated
operating real estate assets and real estate depreciation and amortization, the FFO Measures, as
adjusted, can help the investing public compare the operating performance of a companys real
estate between periods or as compared to other companies. While funds from operations and funds
from operations per share are relevant and widely used measures of operating performance of real
estate investment trusts, the FFO Measures, as adjusted, do not represent cash flow from operations
or net income as defined by U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to those
measures in evaluating AMBs liquidity or operating performance. The FFO Measures, as adjusted,
also do not consider the costs associated with capital expenditures related to AMBs real estate
assets nor are the FFO Measures, as adjusted, necessarily indicative of cash available to fund
AMBs future cash requirements. Management compensates for the limitations of the FFO Measures,
as adjusted, by providing investors with financial statements prepared according to U.S. GAAP,
along with this detailed discussion of the FFO Measures, as adjusted, and a reconciliation of the
FFO Measures, as adjusted, to net income available to common stockholders, a U.S. GAAP measurement.
See Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations, as adjusted for a reconciliation of FFO, as
adjusted, from net (loss) income available to common stockholders and a reconciliation of Core FFO, as
adjusted from FFO, as adjusted.
The
following table reconciles projected Core FFO, as adjusted from
projected net (loss) income available
to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2011:
2011 | ||||||||
Low | High | |||||||
Projected net (loss) income available to common stockholders |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.07 | |||
AMBs share of projected depreciation and amortization |
1.36 | 1.36 | ||||||
AMBs share of depreciation on development profits recognized to date |
| | ||||||
AMBs share of gains on dispositions of operating properties recognized to date |
| | ||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
| | ||||||
Restructuring charges |
| | ||||||
Impact of additional dilutive securities, other, rounding |
(0.03 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||
Projected Funds From Operations, as adjusted (FFO, as adjusted) |
$ | 1.30 | $ | 1.40 | ||||
AMBs share of development gains recognized to date |
| | ||||||
Projected
Core FFO, as adjusted(1) |
$ | 1.30 | $ | 1.40 | ||||
Amounts are expressed per share, except FFO, as adjusted, and Core FFO, as adjusted, which are
expressed per share and unit.
(1) As development gains are difficult to predict in the current economic environment, management
believes Projected Core FFO, as adjusted is the more appropriate and useful measure to reflect its
assessment of AMBs projected operating performance.
Gross book value represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation), net
of impairments, owned by the joint venture and excludes net other assets. Development book values
include uncommitted land.
Gross operating margin is calculated as NOI divided by gross revenues (excluding straight-line
rents and amortization of lease intangibles, reimbursable capital revenue and lease termination
fees) for properties in the pool at period end.
Impairment charges represent the write down of assets due to estimated fair value being lower than
carry value.
Interest coverage. Interest coverage is defined as adjusted EBITDA divided by AMBs share of
interest expense which consists of consolidated interest expense less joint venture partner s
share of interest expense, including amortization, from continuing and discontinued operations and
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint venture debt. AMB uses interest coverage
to measure its liquidity. AMB believes interest coverage is relevant and useful to investors
because it permits investors to measure AMBs ability to meet its interest payments on outstanding
debt. AMBs computation of interest coverage may not be comparable to interest coverage reported by
other companies.
The following table details AMBs share of total interest for the three and twelve months ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
For the Quarters Ended | For the Years Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
Interest | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 33,036 | $ | 30,772 | $ | 130,338 | $ | 118,867 | ||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
(16 | ) | (6 | ) | 49 | (824 | ) | |||||||||
Joint venture partners share of interest expense |
(5,121 | ) | (6,814 | ) | (23,226 | ) | (26,684 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint ventures |
15,318 | 10,713 | 54,850 | 40,473 | ||||||||||||
Total interest |
$ | 43,217 | $ | 34,665 | $ | 162,011 | $ | 131,832 | ||||||||
Investment capacity represents estimated capacity based on the funds current cash and leverage
limitations as of the most recent quarter end. The estimated investment capacities of AMB U.S.
Logistics Fund and AMB Europe Logistics Fund, as open-end funds, are not limited.
Joint Ventures are all joint ventures, including Co-Investment Ventures, with real estate
developers, other real estate operators, or institutional investors where AMB may or may not: have
control, act as the manager and/or developer, earn asset management distributions or fees, or earn
incentive distributions or promoted interests. In certain cases, AMB might provide development,
leasing, property management and/or accounting services for which it may receive market
compensation.
Joint venture partners share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the pro-rata
portion of the applicable financial measure based on AMBs joint venture partners percentage of
equity interest in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for in the
applicable financial measure.
Market equity is defined as the total number of outstanding shares of AMBs common stock and common
limited partnership units multiplied by the closing price per share of its common stock at period
end.
Net Asset Value (NAV). AMB believes NAV is a useful supplemental measure of its operating
performance because it enables both management and investors to analyze the fair value of its
business. An assessment of the fair value of a business involves estimates and assumptions and can
be performed using various methods. AMB has presented certain financial measures related to its
business that it believes may be useful to the investing public in calculating its NAV but has not
presented any specific methodology nor provided any guidance on assumptions or estimates that
should be used in the calculation.
Net Operating Income (NOI). See same store net operating income for discussion of NOI and a
reconciliation of NOI from net income.
Occupancy percentage at period end represents the percentage of total rentable square feet leased,
including month-to-month leases, divided by total rentable square feet at period end. Space is
considered leased when the tenant has either taken physical or economic occupancy.
Owned and managed is defined by AMB as assets in which AMB has at least a 10% ownership interest,
is the property or asset manager, and which it intends to hold for the long-term.
Owned and Managed Supplemental Cash Flow Information. AMB believes that cash flow information based
on GAAP provides the most appropriate cash flow information. However, AMB considers cash flow
information reported on an owned and managed basis (such as straight-line rents and amortization of
lease intangibles, AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles, gross
lease termination fees, net lease termination fees, AMBs share of net lease termination fees,
tenant improvements, lease commissions and other
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 26 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter
Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures | |||
lease costs, building improvements, Co-investment partners share of capital
expenditures and AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures) to be useful
supplemental measures to help the investors better understand AMBs operating
performance and cash flow. See Reporting Definitions for definitions of owned
and managed, AMBs share of and Co-investment venture partners share of.
AMB believes that owned and managed cash flow information helps management and
investors make a comprehensive assessment of the cash flow of AMBs total real
estate portfolio and provides a better understanding of AMBs operating
performance and activities. While owned and managed supplemental cash flow
information is helpful to the investor, it does not provide cash flow
information as defined by GAAP and are not true alternatives to such GAAP
measurements. Further, AMBs computation of owned and managed supplemental cash
flow information may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies,
as they may use different methodologies for calculating these measures.
Percent pre-leased represents the executed lease percentage of total square feet as of the
reporting date.
Pre-stabilized development represents assets which have reached Completion but
have not yet reached Stabilization.
Preferred, with respect to the capitalization ratios, is defined as preferred equity liquidation
preferences.
Redevelopment projects represent those buildings that require significant
capital expenditures (generally more than 25% of acquired cost or existing
basis) to bring the buildings up to operating standards and stabilization
(generally 90% leased).
Recurring capital expenditures represents non-incremental building improvements
and leasing costs required to maintain current revenues. Recurring capital
expenditures do not include estimated acquisition capital expenditures which
were taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase of a building or
which are incurred to bring a building up to operating standards.
Rent changes on renewals and rollovers are calculated as the difference,
weighted by square feet, of the net ABR due the first month of a term
commencement and the net ABR due the last month of the former tenants term. If
free rent is granted, then the first positive full rent value is used as a point
of comparison. The rental amounts exclude base stop amounts, holdover rent and
premium rent charges. If either the previous or current lease terms are under 12
months, then they are excluded from this calculation. If the lease is first
generation or there is no prior lease for comparison, then it is excluded from
this calculation.
Same Store Net Operating Income, Cash-basis SS NOI (SS NOI) and Net Operating Income (NOI).
AMB defines NOI as rental revenues, including reimbursements, less property
operating expenses. NOI excludes depreciation, amortization, general and
administrative expenses, restructuring charges, real estate impairment losses,
development profits (losses), gains (losses) from sale or contribution of real
estate interests, and interest expense. AMB believes that net income, as defined
by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, NOI is a useful
supplemental measure calculated to help investors understand AMBs operating
performance, excluding the effects of gains (losses), costs and expenses which
are not related to the performance of the assets. NOI is widely used by the real
estate industry as a useful supplemental measure, which helps investors compare
AMBs operating performance with that of other companies. Real estate impairment
losses have been excluded in deriving NOI because AMB does not consider its
impairment losses to be a property operating expense. AMB believes that the
exclusion of impairment losses from NOI is a common methodology used in the real
estate industry. Real estate impairment losses relate to the changing values of
AMBs assets but do not reflect the current operating performance of the assets
with respect to their revenues or expenses. AMBs real estate impairment losses
are non-cash charges which represent the write down in the value of assets when
estimated fair value over the holding period is lower than current carrying
value. The impairment charges were principally a result of increases in
estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in market conditions that
adversely impacted underlying real estate values. Therefore, the impairment
charges are not related to the current performance of AMBs real estate
operations and should be excluded from its calculation of NOI.
AMB considers SS NOI to be a useful supplemental measure of our operating
performance for properties that are considered part of the same store pool. AMB
defines Cash-basis SS NOI as NOI on a same store basis excluding straight line
rents and amortization of lease intangibles. See definition of same store
pool. AMB considers SS NOI to be an appropriate and useful supplemental
performance measure because it reflects the
operating performance of the real estate portfolio excluding effects of
non-cash adjustments and provides a better measure of actual cash basis
rental growth for a year-over-year comparison. In addition, AMB believes
that SS NOI helps investors compare the operating performance of AMBs real
estate as compared to other companies. While SS NOI is a relevant and widely
used measure of operating performance of real estate investment trusts, it
does not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by
GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to those measures in
evaluating our liquidity or operating performance. SS NOI also does not
reflect general and administrative expenses, interest expenses, real estate
impairment losses, depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures
and leasing costs, or trends in development and construction activities that
could materially impact our results from operations. Further, AMB s computation of SS NOI may not be comparable to that of other
real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for
calculating SS NOI.
The following table reconciles consolidated cash-basis SS NOI and NOI from
net loss for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(dollars in thousands):
For the Quarters Ended | For the Years Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 11,309 | $ | (10,102 | ) | $ | 33,594 | $ | (27,960 | ) | ||||||
Private capital income |
(9,001 | ) | (10,615 | ) | (30,860 | ) | (38,013 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
51,353 | 50,718 | 196,636 | 175,334 | ||||||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| | | 172,059 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative and fund costs |
33,783 | 31,369 | 125,155 | 116,404 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 2,544 | 4,874 | 6,368 | ||||||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
27,852 | 39,693 | 108,773 | 89,170 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
(5,698 | ) | (2,938 | ) | (24,242 | ) | (96,222 | ) | ||||||||
NOI |
109,598 | 100,669 | 413,930 | 397,140 | ||||||||||||
Less non same-store NOI |
(22,592 | ) | (15,805 | ) | (73,535 | ) | (47,582 | ) | ||||||||
Less non cash adjustments(1) |
(2,129 | ) | (1,596 | ) | (9,045 | ) | (2,803 | ) | ||||||||
Cash-basis same-store NOI |
$ | 84,877 | $ | 83,268 | $ | 331,350 | $ | 346,755 | ||||||||
Less lease termination fees |
$ | (177 | ) | $ | (247 | ) | $ | (3,059 | ) | $ | (2,692 | ) | ||||
Cash-basis same-store NOI, excluding lease termination fees |
$ | 84,700 | $ | 83,021 | $ | 328,291 | $ | 344,063 | ||||||||
(1) Non-cash adjustments include straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles for the same store pool only. |
Same store NOI growth is the change in the NOI (excluding straight-line rents
and amortization of lease intangibles) of the same store pool from the prior
year reporting period to the current year reporting period.
Same store pool includes all properties that are owned as of the end of both
the current and prior year reporting periods and excludes development
properties for both the current and prior reporting periods. The same store
pool is set annually and excludes properties purchased and developments
stabilized after December 31, 2008.
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot are total tenant improvements,
lease commissions and other leasing costs incurred during leasing of second
generation space divided by the total square feet leased. Costs incurred prior
to leasing available space are not included until such space is leased. Second
generation space excludes newly developed square footage or square footage
vacant at acquisition.
Stabilization is generally defined as properties that are 90% occupied.
Stabilized cap rates are calculated as cash NOI or NOI, as applicable,
stabilized to market occupancy (generally 95%) divided by total acquisition
cost. The total acquisition cost basis includes the initial purchase price,
the effects of marking assumed debt to market, lease intangible adjustments,
estimated acquisition capital expenditures, and leasing costs necessary to
achieve stabilization. AMB defines cash NOI as NOI excluding straight line
rents and amortization of lease intangibles.
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 27 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter
Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures | |||
Tenant retention is the square footage of all leases rented by existing
tenants divided by the square footage of all expiring and rented leases during
the reporting period, excluding the square footage of tenants that default or
buy-out prior to expiration of their lease, short-term tenants and the square
footage of month-to-month leases.
Total market capitalization is defined by AMB as AMBs share of total debt
plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity (unless
otherwise noted).
Value-added acquisitions represent unstabilized properties which AMB acquires
as a part of managements current belief that the discount in pricing
attributed to the operating challenges of the property could provide greater
returns, once stabilized, than the returns of stabilized properties, which are
not value added acquisitions. Value added acquisitions generally have one or
more of the following characteristics: (i) existing vacancy, typically in
excess of 20%, (ii) short-term lease rollover, typically during the first two
years of ownership, or (iii) significant capital improvement requirements,
typically in excess of 20% of the purchase price. AMB excludes value-added
acquisitions from its owned and managed and consolidated operating statistics
prior to stabilization (generally 90% leased) in order to provide investors
with data which it feels better reflects the performance of its core
portfolio.
Value-added conversion projects represent the repurposing of industrial
properties to a higher and better use, including office, residential, retail,
research & development or manufacturing. Activities required to prepare the
property for conversion to a higher and better use may include such activities
as rezoning, redesigning, reconstructing and retenanting. The sales price of
the value-added conversion project is generally based on the underlying land
value based on its ultimate use and as such, little to no residual value is
ascribed to the industrial building(s).
Wholly-owned fixed charge coverage is defined as wholly-owned adjusted EBITDA
divided by wholly-owned fixed charges. AMB believes that wholly-owned fixed
charge coverage is useful to certain investors whose focus is to understand
AMBs ability to cover those fixed charges which arise only from obligations
which are solely AMBs with adjusted EBITDA which is solely attributed to 100%
owned assets and activities plus cash distributions from joint ventures. See
Fixed Charge Coverage.
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 28 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter
Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Contacts | |||
Contact Name | Title | Phone | E-mail Address | |||
Hamid R. Moghadam |
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer | (415) 733-9401 | hmoghadam@amb.com | |||
Thomas S. Olinger |
Chief Financial Officer | (415) 733-9405 | tolinger@amb.com | |||
Guy F. Jaquier |
President, Europe and Asia; President, Private Capital | (415) 733-9406 | gjaquier@amb.com | |||
Eugene F. Reilly |
President, The Americas | (617) 619-9333 | ereilly@amb.com | |||
Tracy A. Ward |
Vice President, IR & Corporate Communications | (415) 733-9565 | tward@amb.com |
Corporate Headquarters | Investor Relations | Other Primary Office Locations | ||||||||
AMB Property Corporation
|
Tel: (415) 394-9000 | Amsterdam | Boston | Chicago | Los Angeles | |||||
Pier 1, Bay 1
|
Fax: (415) 394-9001 | México City | Shanghai | Singapore | Tokyo | |||||
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
E-mail: ir@amb.com | |||||||||
Tel: (415) 394-9000
|
Website: www.amb.com | |||||||||
Fax: (415) 394-9001 |
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 29 |
||
2010 Fourth Quarter
Earnings Conference Call 2/3/2011 |
Forward-Looking Statements | |||
Some of the information included in this report and the presentations to be held in
connection therewith contains forward-looking statements, such as those related to factors
regarding positive net absorption, renewal of our lines of credit, future financing activity,
ability to access attractive financing globally, our growth opportunities, long term prospects for
AMB and industrial real estate, scaled overhead structure, capital required for growth and funding
sources, our future debt and JV debt structure and strategies regarding average remaining terms,
average rates, floating rates, bond issuances, credit facilities and secured debt, consolidated vs.
unconsolidated debt, share of JV debt vs. wholly owned debt, NAV, compound annual growth rate,
teams fully engaged in best markets, our buying advantage and investment opportunities available to
us (including distressed or strategic transactions), utilization of low yielding assets and
acquiring assets in excess of cost of capital, recovery in leading business indicators and
fundamentals, including rental rates, occupancy, real estate values, and investor/customer
interest, FFO, as adjusted, Core FFO, as adjusted, NOI and earnings generated by increased occupancy, rental rate
recovery, lease up of the development portfolio, monetization of land bank and development
capability, and the formation of new ventures, capital deployment and other value creating
activities, the consummation of asset sales marketed, under contract or LOI, our opportunities and
plans (including those regarding our global positioning and future capital deployment), estimated
financial and performance results, our projected funds from operations, future assets under
management, same store and/or cash net operating income, occupancy, development portfolio lease-up,
revenue, G&A, overhead expenses, deployed equity and other financial and operational guidance, our
future performance compared to peers and other market indices, rent growth, industrial and other
market, GDP and trade growth, market drivers, trends and forecasts, port opportunities, on-tarmac
opportunities, hiring, performance and retention of key personnel, leveraging of relationships,
continuation and effectiveness of strategic drivers, information regarding our development,
value-added conversion, redevelopment and value-added acquisition projects (including stabilization
or completion dates, square feet at stabilization or completion, sale or contribution dates, yields
from such projects, our share of remaining funding, costs and total investment amounts, scope,
location and timing of development starts and other projects, margins, projected gains and returns,
sustainability, profitability, demand for projects, targeted value-added conversion and acquisition
projects, intent of property use, redevelopment and conversion timelines, entitlement and
repositioning potential of land), ability to deliver customer solutions, strength of lender and
customer relationships, lease expirations, performance and value-creation of investments and market
entry opportunities, real estate valuations, capitalization rates, acquisition capital and volume,
scope and build out and monetization potential of land inventory, co-investment venture and other
estimated investment capacity, terms of the co-investment ventures, performance, revenues and
returns on investment, target leverage, timing and amounts of incentive, asset management,
acquisition and other private capital distributions, promotes and fees, private capital demand,
amounts of new investment, launching of additional joint ventures, termination of funds, planned
gross capitalization, future balance sheet capacity to cover capital requirements, our plans and
ability to retire, refinance and issue secured and unsecured debt and maintain fixed charge
coverage at certain levels, ability to exercise or maintain credit extensions, our position to
maintain a solid financial position, maintain leverage targets and address debt maturities and
interest rate changes, which are made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. Because these forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties, there
are important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements, and you should not rely on the forward-looking statements as
predictions of future events. The events or circumstances reflected in forward-looking statements
might not occur. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as believes, expects, may, will, should, seeks, approximately,
intends, plans, forecasting, pro forma, estimates or anticipates or the negative of
these words and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify forward-looking
statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking statements should not
be read as guarantees of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate
indicators of whether, or the time at which, such performance or results will be achieved. There is
no assurance that the events or circumstances reflected in forward-looking statements will occur or
be achieved. Forward-looking statements are necessarily dependent on assumptions, data or methods
that may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them. We caution you not to
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only
as of the date of this report or the dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to
update or supplement forward-looking statements. The following factors, among others, could cause
actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the
forward-looking statements: changes in general economic conditions in California, the U.S. or
globally (including financial market fluctuations), global trade or in the real estate sector
(including risks relating to decreasing real estate valuations and impairment charges); risks
associated with using debt to fund the companys business activities, including refinancing and
interest rate risks (including inflation risks); the companys failure to obtain, renew, or extend
necessary financing or access the debt or equity markets; the companys failure to maintain its
current credit agency ratings or comply with its debt covenants; risks related to the companys
obligations in the event of certain defaults under co-investment venture and other debt; risks
associated with equity and debt securities financings and issuances (including the risk of
dilution); defaults on or non-renewal of leases by customers or renewal at lower than expected rent
or failure to lease at all or on expected terms; difficulties in identifying properties, portfolios
of properties, or interests in real-estate related entities or platforms to acquire and in
effecting acquisitions on advantageous terms and the failure of acquisitions to perform as the
company expects; unknown liabilities acquired in connection with the acquired properties,
portfolios of properties, or interests in real-estate related entities; the companys failure to
successfully integrate acquired properties and operations; risks and uncertainties affecting property development, redevelopment and value-added conversion (including
construction delays, cost overruns, the companys inability to obtain necessary permits and
financing, the companys inability to lease properties at all or at favorable rents and terms, and
public opposition to these activities); the companys failure to set up additional funds, attract
additional investment in existing funds or to contribute properties to its co-investment ventures
due to such factors as its inability to acquire, develop, or lease properties that meet the
investment criteria of such ventures, or the co-investment ventures inability to access debt and
equity capital to pay for property contributions or their allocation of available capital to cover
other capital requirements; risks and uncertainties relating to the disposition of properties to
third parties and the companys ability to effect such transactions on advantageous terms and to
timely reinvest proceeds from any such dispositions; risks of doing business internationally and
global expansion, including unfamiliarity with the new markets and currency and hedging risks;
risks of changing personnel and roles; risks related to suspending, reducing or changing the
companys dividends; losses in excess of the companys insurance coverage; changes in local, state
and federal laws and regulatory requirements, including changes in real estate, tax and zoning
laws; increases in real property tax rates; risks associated with the companys tax structuring;
increases in interest rates and operating costs or greater than expected capital expenditures;
environmental uncertainties; risks related to natural disasters; and our failure to qualify and
maintain our status as a real estate investment trust. Our success also depends upon economic
trends generally, various market conditions and fluctuations and those other risk factors discussed
under the heading Risk Factors and elsewhere in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009.
© 2011 AMB Property Corporation | 30 |
||