Attached files

file filename
8-K - 8-K_12/07/2010 - NORTHWESTERN CORPek_120710.htm
December 9, 2010
Omni Berkshire Place
New York
2011 Analyst Day

 
 

 
2
forward-looking statement…
During the course of this presentation, there will be forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking
statements often address our expected future business and financial
performance, and often contain words such as “expects,”
“anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” or “will.” 
The information in this presentation is based upon our current
expectations as of the date hereof unless otherwise noted.  Our actual
future business and financial performance may differ materially and
adversely from our expectations expressed in any forward-looking
statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly update
our forward-looking statements or this presentation for any reason.
Although our expectations and beliefs are based on reasonable
assumptions, actual results may differ materially. The factors that may
affect our results are listed in certain of our press releases and
disclosed in the Company’s public filings with the SEC.
 
 

 
3
who we are…
Above data as of 9/30/10
(1) Book capitalization calculated as total debt, excluding capital leases, plus shareholders’ equity.
¾ 661,000 customers
 » 399,000 electric
 » 262,000 natural gas
¾ Approximately 123,000 square
 miles of service territory in
 Montana, South Dakota, and Nebraska
 » 32,000 miles of electric T&D lines
 » 8,400 miles of natural gas T&D pipelines
 » 18 Bcf natural gas storage
 » 8 Bcf natural gas proven reserves
¾ Total generation (mostly base load coal)
 » MT - 222 MW - regulated
 » SD - 312 MW - regulated
¾ Total Assets: $2,899 MM
¾ Total Capitalization: $1,834 MM(1)
¾ Total Employees: 1,354
Located in states with relatively stable economies with
opportunity for system investment and grid expansion
.
 
 

 
4
NorthWestern’s attributes…
¾ Solid operations
 » Cost competitive
 » Above-average reliability
 » Award-winning customer service
¾ Low single A secured credit ratings with a strong balance sheet and liquidity
 » April 15, 2010 Fitch upgraded secured and unsecured ratings to A- and BBB+ respectively
¾ Positive earnings and ROE trend
 » Delivery services rate cases for Montana electric and natural gas
 » Mill Creek Generation Station anticipated into rates early 2011
¾ Strong cash flows
 » NOLs and repair tax deduction provide an effective tax shield until likely 2014
 » 94% pension funded status at end of 2009
¾ Competitive total shareholder return and dividend that has increased every year
 since 2005
 » Added to S&P 600 SmallCap Index on April 9, 2010
¾ Constructive regulatory environment
¾ Forbes.com listed as one of “100 Most Trustworthy Companies”
¾ Realistic investment opportunities 
 
 

 
Brian Bird
Chief Financial Officer
 
 

 
strong credit ratings…
6
A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. Such rating may be subject to revision or
withdrawal at any time by the credit rating agency and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
 
 

 
7
strong balance sheet and liquidity…
¾ Total liquidity approximately $145 million
¾ Total Debt / Total capitalization of 55.8%(1)
¾ In past two years refinanced nearly all outstanding debt
 » In May 2010 we refinanced existing $225 million, 5.875% Senior Secured Notes
 due 2014 with 5.01% First Mortgage Bonds due 2025.
 » Reduced long term debt cost from 6.8% to 5.6%
¾ Nearly all long-term debt matures after 2015
 » Increased average debt maturity from 8.8yrs to 11.5yrs
(1) Total capitalization as of 9/30/10
(2) Excludes outstanding 9/30/10 Revolver balance of $109 million maturing in 2012.
 
 

 
8
strong cash flows…
Earnings trend and NOLs provide strong cash flows to
fund future investment.
 
 

 
solid pension funding position…
9
Data source: SNL Financial
As a result of the significant contribution of $93 million to our pension
plan and solid market returns in 2009, we are better positioned than
our peers at December 31, 2009
 
 

 
10
and sustainable dividend…
Goal for dividend payout ratio of 60% - 70%.
Current dividend yield about 5% with year-over-year dividend growth
.
(1) 2010 estimated payout range assumes midpoint of $1.95 - $2.10 guidance range
 
 

 
11
reaffirming 2010 EPS guidance…
¾ The major assumptions include, but are not limited to, the following
 expectations:
 » Excludes approximately $.06/share for the 2010 estimated effect of the Montana rate increase proposed by
 the Stipulation, which is pending approval by the MPSC;
 » The release of the second quarter 2010 valuation allowance of approximately $.06/share against certain
 state NOL carryforwards is
excluded from the earnings outlook;
 » The tax benefit associated with the IRS approval of a tax accounting method to deduct repairs is included
 in the earnings outlook;
 » Fully diluted average shares outstanding of 36.5 million; and
 » Normal weather in the Company’s electric and natural gas service territories for the remainder of 2010.
 
 

 
2009 to 2010 earnings bridge…
12
The major assumptions include, but are not limited to, the following expectations:
» Excludes approximately $.06/share for the 2010 estimated effect of the Montana rate increase proposed by the Stipulation, which is pending
 approval by the MPSC;
» The release of the second quarter 2010 valuation allowance of approximately $.06/share against certain state NOL carryforwards is excluded
 from the earnings outlook;
» The tax benefit associated with the IRS approval of a tax accounting method to deduct repairs is included in the earnings outlook;
» Fully diluted average shares outstanding of 36.5 million; and
» Normal weather in the Company’s electric and natural gas service territories for the remainder of 2010.
 
 

 
13
near-term potential earnings drivers…
¾ 2011 expectations/assumptions:
 » Mill Creek in rate base in 2011 adding about $.20/share
  $7.5 million incremental post-tax contribution compared to 2010
  MCGS rates pick up full interest costs & equity return in 2011
 » Full year effect of Montana rate adjustment adds roughly $.05/share
  Preliminary MPSC decision agreeing to $6.7 million stipulation settlement
  Preliminary MPSC decision on ‘decoupling’ decreases the settlement by $1.3 million
  Recorded about $3 million in rate increase in 2010
 » Increase in gross margin over 2010 of $.20/share to $.30/share:
  Expiration of CU4 legacy contract adding approximately $.10/share
  Expense obligation reduction of $3.8 million, after tax
  Improvement in volumes over 2010 of $.10/share to $.20/share
  Montana retail volumes increase from mild 2010 weather
  Montana wholesale transmission volume increases
  Montana gas volumes due to mild 2010 winter weather
 » Offset by increases in expenses over 2010 of $.25/share to $.35/share
  Labor, Maintenance, Property taxes, and Depreciation
¾ 2012 expectations:
 » Full year effect of South Dakota and Nebraska natural gas rate cases
 » AFUDC on Montana wind projects
 » If Battle Creek in rate base, pursuing additional natural gas reserves
 
 

 
Bob Rowe
President and CEO
 
 

 
15
constructive regulatory environment…
¾ Montana
 » Rate case
  MPSC reached a decision on the rate case at a recent work session; decision and
 approval is subject to MPSC issuance of a final order
  MPSC approved the Stipulated settlement with Consumer Counsel for a $6.7 million
 rate increase
  MPSC also approved allocated cost of service and rate design and inverted block
 rates
  Decoupling addressed with the following adjustments:
  Electric rate base only
  10.0% ROE
  Weather adjusted (weather risk is on the Company)
  Potential impact to Company is $1.3 million in revenues annually
  Company will evaluate decoupling options after the order is released on decoupling
  Order expected in December 2010
 » Mill Creek Generation Station filed
  Interim rates approved by the MPSC and will be in effect January 1, 2011
  Prudency case to be filed Q1 2011
 » MPSC election results
  Two new commissioners beginning Jan 1, 2011
  Current Chairman will leave office Dec 31, 2010
 
 

 
16
regulatory environment con’t…
¾ South Dakota
 » Expect to file natural gas rate cases during 2011 pending 2010 results
 » Expect to file on environmental rider on the Neal plant for emissions compliance
 » Election results
  Current Chairman Dusty Johnson re-elected but appointed by new Governor to be Chief
 of Staff
  Outgoing South Dakota Secretary of State, Chris Nelson, has been appointed PUC
 commissioner by the Governor beginning January 1, 2011
¾ Nebraska
 » Expect to file natural gas rate cases during 2011 pending 2010 results
¾ FERC
 » Encouraged Company to develop MSTI on a cost of service basis by requesting
 appropriate tariff waivers for existing OATT
 » Approved 230kV Renewable Collector Open Season
 » Docket filed for Mill Creek on April 10, 2010 to establish rates as of January 1, 2011
  October 15, 2010, Order issued authorizing us to put our filed tariffs in place January 1,
 2011, subject to refund, and set the case for hearing.
 
 

 
17
regulatory milestones in 2011…
Montana
Distribution Infrastructure
¾Accounting Order (in 2010)
¾Make filing
Q4
Q2
 
Prudency Review for Mill Creek
PInterim filing (in 2010) 
Q4
¾Prudency filing
Q1
¾FERC filing
Q2
Approval for Montana Wind Projects
¾Pre - approval filing
Q2
 
 
Natural Gas - Rate base Battle Creek
¾Rate base filing
Q2
 
 
South Dakota
Natural Gas Rate Case
¾File rate case pending 2010 results
Q2
 
Environmental riders for Big Stone &
Neal
¾Environmental rider filing on Neal 
Q2
 
 
Nebraska
Natural Gas Rate Case
 
¾File rate case pending 2010 results
Q2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
longer term investment opportunities…
¾ Distribution system enhancements
 » Incremental rate based investment to enhance reliability and
 capacity, improve rural service, and prepare the system for
 potential smart grid applications
¾ Energy supply
 » Big Stone and Neal plants’ pollution control equipment
 » Natural gas reserves
 » South Dakota peaking generation
 » Wind projects and other renewable projects
 
¾ Transmission projects
 » Network upgrades
 » Colstrip 500 kV upgrade
 » 230 kV Renewable Collector System
 » Mountain States Transmission Intertie (MSTI)
 » South Dakota transmission opportunities
18
 
 

 
Curt Pohl
Vice President - Retail Operations
 
 

 
20
distribution infrastructure project …
¾ Project Scope:
 » Electric  $222M CAPEX  $55M O&M
 » Gas  $50M CAPEX  $16M O&M
¾ Project Goals:
 » Electric System
  Arrest or reverse the trend in aging infrastructure
 
 

 
proactive vs. reactive…
(what is the least cost replacement rate?)
21
 
 

 
22
electric plan components…
Poles
Accelerated inspection
and replacement
5 Year cycle
$90M Capex $8M O&M
5 year
costs
(millions)
50
100
U/G Cable
Accelerated
replacement (10 years)
Collect data
$46M Capex $3 O&M
Tree Trimming
Accelerated trimming
(5 years)
Cut beetle kill trees
$24M O&M
Substations &
Automation
Accelerated inspection and
replace
Install communications
$57M Capex $5M O&M
Capacity Margins
Maintain current
Improve transfer
capabilities
$21M Capex
Rural Reliability
Eliminate all 4Q circuits
$8M Capex $8M O&M
Overhead Equip.
Accelerated inspection and
replacement (3 years)
Collect data
$7M O&M
TOTAL est. = $222M Capex & $55M O&M
 
 

 
23
gas plan components…
NWE’s Gas
Distribution
Infrastructure
Plan
Mitigation of Safety Threats
5 Projects
$45M Capex $1.5M O&M
Evaluation and ranking of components
for leak potential
Damage Prevention
$7.6M O&M
Tactics to minimize third party damage
leading to excavation-related leaks
DIMP-guided threat
analysis of system
components
(5 projects)
Operational and
administrative initiatives
to reduce third party
leaks
Data Acquisition
$0.4 CAPEX $2M O&M
The foundation of the process
Operational Review
$5M Capex $5M O&M
Appropriate actions to improve
operations
Long-term data needs to
facilitate DIMP
implementation
System operational
improvement initiatives
(e.g., zone valves now
under study)
TOTAL est. = $50M Capex & $16M O&M
 
 

 
Dave Gates
Vice President - Wholesale Operations
 
 

 
25
generation growth highlights…
Mill Creek Generating Unit
 in Montana
¾ What:
120-150 MW plant near Anaconda,
 MT
 » Built for regulation services to
 balance supply and load for NWE’s
 Balancing Area
 » Rate based cost of service
 investment
 » Final costs right at $200 million
¾ Why:
Existing services became more
 expensive and scarce and
 existing contract for services
 expiring on January 1, 2011
In service date for Mill Creek Generation Station = Jan 1, 2011
 
 

 
26
Mill Creek project milestones…
2010 and Prior
Mill Creek
ü Pre-approved for public interest by the MPSC
  2009
ü Begin construction   2009
ü Construction completed  2010
ü Plant ‘test fired’   2010
ü Interim rates approved   2010
 (both at FERC and MT PSC)
2011
Mill Creek
¾ Final Prudency filed with MPSC  Q1
¾ FERC rate settlement                         Q2
¾ Expected decision on prudency from MPSC Q3
   
 
 

 
27
generation growth highlights…
Renewable Generation in
 Montana
¾ What:
25-50 MW’s of Wind Generation
 » Could be PPA or rate based asset
 » Estimated construction cost
 between $40 - $100 million
¾ Why:
Needed to meet the Montana RPS
 standard of 10% by 2012 and 15%
 by 2015.
Needs to be added to meet Montana RPS
 
 

 
28
generation investments…
Peaking Plant in South
 Dakota
¾ What:
60 MW peaking plant near Aberdeen, SD
 » Current contract expires December
 2012
 » Rate based cost of service investment
 » Estimated to cost around $60 million
¾ Why:
 » Existing regional services are
 becoming scarce
 » Current capacity market conditions
 make it prudent to recheck
 assumptions and alternatives to
 confirm timing
In service date for SD Peaker 2013-2015
 
 

 
29
pollution control investments…
Pollution Control -
Big Stone Plant (SD)
¾ What:
Emissions reduction to Big Stone
 454 MW plant located in NE SD
 » Compliance with Clean Air
 Visibility Rule
 » Estimated to cost between $130 -
 $150 million for our portion (23.4%)
 » Emissions tracker mechanism
 exists with SDPUC
¾ Why:
EPA requires reduction of SO2,
 NOx, Hg, etc, etc.
Required to occur by 2016
 
 

 
30
pollution control investments…
Pollution Control -
Neal Plant (SD)
¾ What:
Scrubber installation to 655 MW
 Neal plant located in NW Iowa
 » Compliance with Clean Air
 Visibility Rule
 » Estimated to cost between $15 -
 $25 million for our portion (8.7%)
 » Emissions tracker mechanism
 exists with SDPUC
¾ Why:
EPA requires reduction of SO2,
 NOx, Hg, etc, etc.
Expected by 2014
 
 

 
31
natural gas supply…
Battle Creek acquisition
¾ Purchase of proven natural gas
 reserves located proximate to our MT
 system
 » ½ bcf annual production (8.7 bcf
 total)
 » Represents 2.4% of MT retail
 usage
 » Interim rates collected through
 monthly tracker, including return
 on investment, beginning 11-1-10
 » Initial Purchase price of $11.4 M
 » Acquired an additional $1 million
 ownership interest in field on
 December 3, 2010
¾ Why:
Provide stable long term pricing to rate
 payors while earning a modest return
Closed on acquisition in September and December 2010
 
 

 
wind - a new cash crop?…
32
 
 

 
33
our proposed transmission projects…
 
 

 
34
extended open seasons…
¾ MSTI siting delays:
 » Draft EIS delayed by Jefferson County, MT litigation against MDEQ
¾ General economic conditions:
 » Slow down in economy making developers cautious on LT
 commitments
 » Low natural gas prices making renewables less cost effective
¾ Market confusion:
 » Confusion in California market making it difficult to understand
 probability
¾ Potential Federal Legislation:
 » Federal policy needs clarity around renewables to advance wind
 generation
Expected to remain open until the end of 2011
 
 

 
35
Electric Transmission America study
Headed by AEP & MidAmerican Energy
1. Phase 2 of study just
 released
2. Summarizes two
 overlay paths to
 consider
3. Transmission
 supporting integration
 of about 55 GW of
 wind generation
4. Estimated overlay cost
 range between $20 -
 $25 Billion
5. South Dakota would
 have over 4,000 MW
 wind generation
 deployed in 2029
 
 

 
36
Green Power Express …
Headed by ITC Holdings
1. Transfer capacity of 10
 -12 GW of power
 supporting up to 22
 GW of new wind
 generation
2. Crosses 7 states,
 numerous utility areas
 and two RTO’s
3. Estimated cost of
 project $10 - $12 Billion
4. Investment in SD
 would be significant
 
 

 
37
potential project summary…
Opportunity to increase and diversify earnings as compared with
our existing $1.8 billion rate base
(including Mill Creek).
 
 

 
in summary…
¾ Solid operations
¾ Low single A secured credit ratings with a strong
 balance sheet and liquidity
¾ Positive earnings and ROE trend
¾ Strong cash flows
¾ Competitive total shareholder return and dividend
 that has increased every year since 2005
¾ Constructive regulatory environment
¾ Forbes.com “100 Most Trustworthy Companies”
¾ Realistic investment opportunities 
38