Exhibit 99.6
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Trico Marine
Services
The following discussion is intended to assist in
understanding our financial position and results of operations
and should be read in conjunction with Selected Financial
Data, our consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 2007 and 2008 and for each of the three years
ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 and our consolidated
financial statements as of June 30, 2008 and 2009 and for
the six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2009,
including the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this offering
memorandum. The following discussion should also be read in
conjunction with subsequent developments related to the
Parents liquidity discussed in the section titled
Liquidity Sufficiency.
Overview
We are an integrated provider of subsea services, subsea
trenching and protection services and OSVs to oil and natural
gas exploration and production companies that operate in major
offshore producing regions around the world. We acquired Active
Subsea in 2007 and DeepOcean and CTC Marine in 2008. As a result
of these acquisitions, our subsea operations, including
technologically advanced, and often proprietary services
performed in demanding subsea environments, represented
approximately 82% of our revenues for the second quarter of
2009. The remainder of our revenue is attributable to our legacy
towing and supply business. We operate through three business
segments: (1) subsea services, (2) subsea trenching
and protection and (3) towing and supply.
Our
Outlook
Our results of operations are highly dependent on the level of
operating and capital spending for exploration and development
by the energy industry, among other things. The energy
industrys level of operating and capital spending is
substantially related to the demand for natural resources, the
prevailing commodity price of natural gas and crude oil, and
expectations for such prices. During periods of low commodity
prices, our customers may reduce their capital spending budgets
which could result in reduced demand for our services. Other
factors that influence the level of capital spending by our
customers which are beyond our control include: worldwide demand
for crude oil and natural gas and the cost of exploring for and
producing oil and natural gas, which can be affected by
environmental regulations, significant weather conditions,
maintenance requirements and technological advances that affect
energy and its usage.
For the remainder of 2009, we will continue to focus on the
following key areas:
Reduce our debt level and carefully manage liquidity and cash
flow. Our substantial amount of indebtedness
requires us to manage our cash flow to maintain compliance under
our debt covenants and to meet our capital expenditure and debt
service requirements. We have a centralized and disciplined
approach to marketing and contracting our vessels and equipment
to achieve less spot market exposure in favor of long-term
contracts. The expansion of our subsea services activities is
intended to have a stabilizing influence on our cash flow. We
will also work towards deleveraging our balance sheet as we
manage cash flow and liquidity throughout the year.
Maximize our vessel utilization and our service
spreads. We continue to increase our combined
subsea services and subsea trenching and protection fleet
primarily through chartering of third-party vessels. We offer
our customers a variety of subsea installation, construction,
trenching and protection services using combinations of our
equipment and personnel to maximize the earnings per vessel and
to increase the opportunity to offer a differentiated technology
service package.
Expand our presence in additional subsea services
markets. In contrast to the overall market served
by our traditional towing and supply business, we believe the
subsea market is growing and will
54
provide a higher rate of return on our services. We have
increased our marketing efforts to expand our subsea services
business in West Africa, Southeast Asia / China,
Brazil, the United States and Mexico. For the second quarter of
2009, our aggregate revenues in these markets represented 33% of
our revenue in subsea operations. Through our legacy towing and
supply business, we have strong relationships with important
customers, such as a contractor of Pemex, Statoil and CNOOC, and
an in-depth understanding of their bidding procedures, technical
requirements and needs. We are leveraging this infrastructure to
expand our subsea services and subsea trenching and protection
businesses around the world.
Invest in growth of our subsea fleet. We
continually aim to improve our fleets capabilities in the
subsea services area by focusing on more sophisticated next
generation subsea vessels that will be attractive to a broad
range of customers and can be deployed worldwide. We are
building three new MPSVs (the Trico Star, Trico
Service and Trico Sea), which are expected to be
delivered in the first, second and third quarters of 2010,
respectively. Our remaining committed capital expenditures
related to these vessels is approximately $40 million. We
also lease many of the vessels used in our subsea services and
subsea trenching and protection businesses. This gives us the
opportunity to expand our business without large incremental
capital expenditures, to match vessel capabilities with project
requirements, and to benefit from periods of oversupply of
vessels. We believe having an up-to-date and technologically
advanced fleet is critical to our being competitive within the
subsea services and subsea trenching and protection businesses.
Finally, we invest in ROVs and subsea trenching and protection
equipment. We have recently completed the construction of the
RT-1 and the UT-1 further enhancing our capabilities. We view
our future expenditures for such assets as discretionary in
nature, and we will only undertake them to the extent we believe
they are economically justified.
Reduce exposure to a declining offshore towing and supply
vessel business. Over time, we believe
transitioning away from a low growth, commoditized towing and
supply business toward specialized subsea services will result
in improved operating results. In 2009, we sold a PSV and five
OSVs for aggregate proceeds of $29.8 million. We have also
executed agreements for the sale of two North Sea class vessels
for approximately $40 million. We will continue to look for
opportunities to divest non-core or underperforming towing and
supply assets. We will also continue to position our towing and
supply vessels in markets where we believe we have a competitive
advantage or that have positive fundamentals.
Market
Outlook Demand for Our Vessels and
Services
Each of our operating segments experiences different impacts
from the current overall economic slowdown, crisis in the credit
markets, and decline in oil prices. In all segments, however, we
have seen increased exploration and production spending in
Brazil, Mexico and China and will continue to focus our efforts
on increasing our market presence in those regions in the last
three months of 2009. For the remainder of 2009, we expect, in
general, further declines in exploration and production
spending, offshore drilling worldwide, and construction
spending, but we anticipate overall subsea spending to increase
based on unit growth in new subsea installation and a large base
of installed units.
Subsea Services. Although projects may be
postponed as a result of low commodity prices, we have not had
any contracts canceled in 2009; however, some of our projects
have been delayed until the second half of 2009 and into 2010.
Given that a majority of our subsea services work includes
inspection, maintenance and repair required to maintain existing
pipelines, and such services are covered by operating
expenditures rather than capital expenditures, we believe that
the outlook for our subsea services will remain consistent with
the levels of subsea spending occurring in 2008. We have seen no
material decline in pricing for subsea services when compared to
contracts awarded in 2008.
Subsea Protection and Trenching. For the
remainder of 2009, we expect demand for our subsea protection
and trenching services to be similarly driven by the increase in
overall spending on subsea services. However, we believe that
certain markets may be softer due to seasonality in this area
55
and therefore are mitigating such seasonality by mobilizing our
assets to regions less susceptible to seasonality. We generally
expect a weak market in the North Sea but we believe there is an
opportunity to develop a meaningful presence in emerging growth
areas for this segment including Southeast Asia / China,
Australia, the Mediterranean and Brazil.
Towing and Supply. During 2009, we have
experienced significant declines in utilization and day rates in
the Gulf of Mexico and North Sea driven by reduced exploration
and production spending as a result of low commodity prices in
addition to seasonality for our AHTS vessels in the North Sea.
We have started to take appropriate measures to reduce our cost
structure accordingly and to mobilize vessels in these regions
to regions with increased activity. Our current view of the
worldwide OSV market is that the combination of reduced customer
spending on offshore drilling coupled with the likely level of
newly built vessels to be delivered in the remainder of 2009 and
2010, that prices and utilization in most markets, including the
North Sea, Gulf of Mexico and West Africa, will remain very weak.
Market
Outlook Credit Environment
Through the latter half of 2008 we saw, and during the first
nine months of 2009 we have continued to see, lenders take steps
to initiate procedures to reduce their overall exposure to one
company (which will limit our ability to seek new financing from
existing lenders), increase margins and improve their collateral
position. Should we desire to further refinance existing debt or
access capital markets for new financing after this offering, we
expect terms and conditions of such refinancing or access to
capital markets to be challenging throughout the remainder of
2009.
Significant
Events
Acquisition of DeepOcean and CTC Marine. On
May 15, 2008, we initiated a series of events and
transactions that resulted in our acquiring 100% of DeepOcean
and its wholly-owned subsidiary CTC Marine. The acquisition
price for DeepOcean and CTC Marine was approximately
$700 million. To fund the transactions we used available
cash, borrowings under new, existing and amended revolving lines
of credit, proceeds from the issuance of $300 million of
6.5% Debentures and the issuance of phantom stock units.
DeepOceans and CTC Marines results are included in
our results of operations from the date of acquisition, and
significantly affected every component of our 2008 operating
income as compared with our prior year results.
The following table provides the amounts included in our 2008
results from the operations of DeepOcean and CTC Marine for the
period from May 16, 2008 to December 31, 2008 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
2008(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DeepOcean
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and CTC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Marine
|
|
|
Legacy Trico
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
556,131
|
|
|
$
|
308,649
|
|
|
$
|
247,482
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
(383,894
|
)
|
|
|
(242,937
|
)
|
|
|
(140,957
|
)
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
(68,185
|
)
|
|
|
(21,182
|
)
|
|
|
(47,003
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(61,432
|
)
|
|
|
(34,203
|
)
|
|
|
(27,229
|
)
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
(172,840
|
)
|
|
|
(172,840
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(127,545
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162,513
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Please see Note 4 to our
consolidated annual financial statements included in this
offering memorandum for pro forma results from this acquisition.
|
Proxy Contest. As a result of the Kistefos AS
lawsuit (discussed in Note 16 to the Parents
consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2008 and
2009 and for the six month periods ended
56
June 30, 2008 and 2009), the costs associated with our 2009
annual meeting were significantly higher due to the fact that
Kistefos AS, a private investment company in Norway, made nine
proposals (eight of which Trico opposed). Our expenses related
to the solicitation (in excess of those normally spent for an
annual meeting with an uncontested director election and
excluding salaries and wages of our regular employees and
officers) were approximately $1.6 million which were
recognized for the six month period ending June 30, 2009.
6.5% Convertible Notes Exchange. In the
first six months of 2009, various holders of our
6.5% Debentures converted $24.5 million principal
amount of the debentures, collectively, for a combination of
$6.9 million in cash related to an interest make-whole
provision and 605,759 shares of our common stock based on
the conversion rate of 24.74023 shares of common stock per
$1,000 principal amount of debentures. On May 11, 2009, we
entered into exchange agreements, or the Exchange Agreements,
with all remaining holders of the 6.5% Debentures. Pursuant
to the Exchange Agreements, holders exchanged each $1,000 in
principal amount of the 6.5% Debentures for $800 in
principal amount of 8.125% Debentures, $50 in cash and
12 shares of our common stock (or warrants to purchase
shares at $0.01 per share in lieu thereof). At closing, we
exchanged $253.5 million in aggregate principal amount of
the 6.5% Debentures and accrued but unpaid interest thereon
for $12.7 million in cash, 360,696 shares of common
stock, warrants exercisable for 2,681,484 shares of common
stock and $202.8 million in aggregate principal amount of
8.125% Debentures. The exchange reduced the principal
amount of our outstanding debt by $50.7 million. The
8.125% Debentures are governed by an indenture, dated as of
May 14, 2009, between us and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as trustee. This indenture was filed with the SEC
as part of a current report on
Form 8-K
issued on May 19, 2009. Under the terms of the indenture,
if the holders elect to convert prior to May 2011, they would
not be entitled to an interest make-whole provision. The
8.125% Debentures are our senior secured obligations and
are secured by a second lien on certain of the assets that serve
as security for our $50 million U.S. credit facility. The
8.125% Debentures are effectively subordinated to all of
our other existing and future secured indebtedness to the extent
of the value of our assets collateralizing this indebtedness and
any liabilities of our subsidiaries.
Volstad Impairment. In July 2007, DeepOcean AS
established a limited partnership under Norwegian law with
Volstad Maritime AS for the sole purpose of creating an entity
that would finance the construction of a new vessel. This entity
is fully consolidated by DeepOcean. According to the terms of
the partnership agreement, neither party to the partnership was
obligated to fund more than its committed capital contribution
with the remaining portion to be financed through third party
financings. Given the global economic turmoil and resulting
difficulties in obtaining financing, the purpose of the
partnership has been frustrated due to the fact that the
partnership has been unable to fulfill its commitment to obtain
financing for the remaining amount necessary to purchase the new
vessel. As a result, on April 27, 2009, DeepOcean AS served
notice to Volstad of its formal withdrawal from the partnership,
effective immediately, thereby eliminating its continuing
obligations therein. As a result, our total vessel construction
commitments were reduced by $41.6 million. On June 26,
2009, we reached an agreement with Volstad in which DeepOcean AS
withdrew from the partnership, CTC Marine was relieved of
obligations under the time charter with the partnership and we
were indemnified in full against claims of either Volstad or the
shipyard building the vessel. Our sole obligation is to pay NOK
7.0 million ($1.1 million) against an invoice for work
done to the vessel. Based on the outcome of those negotiations,
we recorded a $14.0 million asset impairment in the second
quarter of 2009, which is reflected in the Parents
consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2008 and
2009 and for the six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and
2009 on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows under
the line item Impairment. No remaining assets
associated with this partnership are on our books.
Factors that
Affect Our Results
We have three operating segments: subsea services, represented
primarily by the operations of DeepOcean and seven subsea
platform supply vessels, or SPSVs, from our historic operations;
subsea
57
trenching and protection, represented by the operations of CTC
Marine; and towing and supply, represented primarily by our
historical operation of marine supply vessels.
The revenues and costs for our subsea services segment primarily
are determined by the scope of individual projects and in
certain cases by multi-year contracts. Subsea services projects
may utilize any combination of vessels, both owned and leased,
and components of our non-fleet equipment consisting of ROVs,
installation handling equipment, and survey equipment. The scope
of work, complexity, and area of operation for our projects will
determine what assets will be deployed to service each
respective project. Rates for our subsea services typically
include a composite day rate for the utilization of a vessel
and/or the
appropriate equipment for the project, as well as the crew.
These day rates can be fixed or variable and are primarily
influenced by the specific technical requirements of the
project, the availability of the required vessels and equipment
and the projects geographic location and competition.
Occasionally, projects are based on unit-rate contracts (based
on units of work performed, such as miles of pipeline inspected
per day) and occasionally through lump-sum contractual
arrangements. In addition, we generate revenues for onshore
engineering work, post processing of survey data, and associated
reporting. The operating costs for the subsea services segment
primarily reflect the rental or ownership costs for our leased
vessels and equipment, crew compensation costs, supplies and
marine insurance. Our customers are typically responsible for
mobilization expenses and fuel costs. Variables that may affect
our subsea services segment include the scope and complexity of
each project, weather or environmental downtime, and water
depth. Delays or acceleration of projects will result in
fluctuations of when revenues are earned and costs are incurred
but generally they will not materially affect the total amount
of costs.
The revenues and costs for our subsea trenching and protection
segment are also primarily determined by the scope of individual
projects. Based on the overall scale of the respective projects,
we may utilize any combination of engineering services, assets
and personnel, consisting of a vessel that deploys a subsea
trenching asset, ROV and survey equipment, and supporting
offshore crew and management. Our asset and personnel deployment
is also dependent on various other factors such as subsea soil
conditions, the type and size of our customers product and
water depth. Revenues for our subsea trenching and protection
segment include a composite daily rate for the utilization of
vessels and assets plus fees for engineering services, project
management services and equipment mobilization. These daily
rates will vary in accordance with the complexity of the
project, existing framework agreements with clients, competition
and geographic location. The operating costs for this segment
predominately reflect the rental of its leased vessels, the
hiring of third party equipment (principally ROVs and survey
equipment which we sometimes hire from our subsea services
segment), engineering personnel, crew compensation and
depreciation on subsea assets. The delay or acceleration of the
commencement of customer offshore projects will result in
fluctuations in the timing of recognition of revenues and
related costs, but generally will not materially affect total
project revenues and costs.
The revenues for our towing and supply segment are impacted
primarily by fleet size and capabilities, day rates and vessel
utilization. Day rates and vessel utilization are primarily
driven by demand for our vessels, supply of new vessels, our
vessel availability, customer requirements, competition and
weather conditions. The operating costs for the towing and
supply segment are primarily a function of the active fleet
size. The most significant of our normal direct operating costs
include crew compensation, maintenance and repairs, marine
inspection costs, supplies and marine insurance. We are
typically responsible for normal operating expenses, while our
contracts provide that customers are typically responsible for
mobilization expenses and fuel costs.
Risks and
Uncertainties
We experienced lower than expected operating results in the
first half of 2009 as a result of seasonality early in 2009,
lower utilization due to planned vessel mobilizations for longer
term projects commencing mid-year in our subsea services
segments, deteriorating rates and utilization in our towing and
supply segment and the further
58
weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to the Norwegian kroner
during the second quarter of 2009, which also resulted in
additional cash payments required to bring the $200 million
revolving credit facility within its contractual credit limit.
As a result of these events, we believe that our forecasted cash
flows and available credit capacity are not sufficient to meet
our commitments as they come due over the next twelve months and
that we will not be able to remain in compliance with our debt
covenants unless we are able to successfully refinance certain
debt. We are pursuing the Refinancing Transactions to refinance
a large portion of our debt. We also expect to receive approximately
$17 million in net cash proceeds in the fourth quarter from
the sale of the Northern Challenger, for which we
previously announced a signed sale contract. If we fail to
complete the Refinancing Transactions successfully, we will
continue our current dialogues with our lenders to amend our
existing facilities and our efforts to reduce debt outstanding
through asset sales and negotiations with holders of our
convertible debentures. See further discussion in
Note 2 Risks and Uncertainties
in our accompanying consolidated financial statements.
If none of these approaches are successful in refinancing
certain debt, we would not be able to remain in compliance with
our debt covenants; and we would be in default under our credit
agreements, which, in turn, would constitute an event of default
under all of our outstanding debt agreements. If this were to
occur, all of our outstanding debt would become callable by our
creditors and would be reclassified as a current liability on
our balance sheet. Our inability to repay the outstanding debt,
if it were to become current or if it were called by our
creditors, would have a material adverse effect on us and raises
substantial doubt about Tricos ability to continue as a
going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do not
include any adjustment related to the recoverability and
classification of recorded assets or the amounts and
classification of liabilities that might result from this
uncertainty.
Our ability to generate or access cash is subject to events
beyond our control, such as declines in expenditures for
exploration, development and production activity, reduction in
global consumption of refined petroleum products, general
economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and
other factors. In light of the current financial turmoil, we may
be exposed to credit risk relating to our credit facilities to
the extent our lenders may be unable or unwilling to provide
necessary funding in accordance with their commitments.
Depending on the market demand for our vessels and other growth
opportunities that may arise, we may require additional debt or
equity financing. The ability to raise additional indebtedness
may be restricted by the terms of the 8.125% Debentures and
the notes being sold pursuant to this offering, which
restrictions include a prohibition on incurring certain types of
indebtedness if our leverage exceeds a certain level.
59
Results of
Operations
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2008
The following table summarizes our consolidated results of
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea services
|
|
$
|
137,562
|
|
|
$
|
50,204
|
|
|
$
|
87,358
|
|
|
|
174
|
%
|
Subsea trenching and protection
|
|
|
94,403
|
|
|
|
15,463
|
|
|
|
78,940
|
|
|
|
511
|
%
|
Towing and supply
|
|
|
69,585
|
|
|
|
97,800
|
|
|
|
(28,215
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
301,550
|
|
|
|
163,467
|
|
|
|
138,083
|
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea services
|
|
|
(15,871
|
)
|
|
|
7,954
|
|
|
|
(23,825
|
)
|
|
|
(300
|
)%
|
Subsea trenching and protection
|
|
|
11,679
|
|
|
|
(2,502
|
)
|
|
|
14,181
|
|
|
|
(567
|
)%
|
Towing and supply
|
|
|
16,984
|
|
|
|
22,269
|
|
|
|
(5,285
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)%
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(13,729
|
)
|
|
|
(10,696
|
)
|
|
|
(3,033
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(937
|
)
|
|
|
17,025
|
|
|
|
(17,962
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,862
|
|
|
|
4,849
|
|
|
|
(2,987
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)%
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(22,578
|
)
|
|
|
(8,286
|
)
|
|
|
(14,292
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
%
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on mark to market of embedded derivative
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
(2,310
|
)
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)%
|
Gain on conversions of debt
|
|
|
11,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,330
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Refinancing costs
|
|
|
(6,224
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,224
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
(1,465
|
)
|
|
|
2,593
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(14,004
|
)
|
|
|
9,813
|
|
|
|
(23,817
|
)
|
|
|
(243
|
)%
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(18,669
|
)
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
(19,415
|
)
|
|
|
(2,603
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
4,665
|
|
|
|
9,067
|
|
|
|
(4,402
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)%
|
Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(1,264
|
)
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Trico Marine Services,
Inc.
|
|
$
|
3,401
|
|
|
$
|
6,685
|
|
|
$
|
(3,284
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following information on day rates, utilization and average
number of vessels is relevant to our revenues and are the
primary drivers of our revenue fluctuations. Our consolidated
fleets average
60
day rates, utilization, and average number of vessels by vessel
class, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Average Day Rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPSVs(1)
|
|
$
|
24,644
|
|
|
$
|
20,160
|
|
MSVs(2)
|
|
|
74,440
|
|
|
|
74,508
|
(6)
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
$
|
113,347
|
|
|
|
179,115
|
(6)
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHTSs(3)
|
|
$
|
21,196
|
|
|
$
|
36,345
|
|
PSVs(4)
|
|
|
16,101
|
|
|
|
17,721
|
|
OSVs(5)
|
|
|
6,909
|
|
|
|
7,209
|
|
Utilization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPSVs
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
MSVs
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
79
|
%(6)
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
|
|
84
|
%(6)
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHTSs
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
82
|
%
|
PSVs
|
|
|
89
|
%
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
OSVs
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
Average number of Vessels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPSVs
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
MSVs
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
(6)
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
(6)
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHTSs
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
PSVs
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
OSVs
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
38.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Subsea platform supply vessels
|
|
(2) |
|
Multi-purpose service vessels
|
|
(3) |
|
Anchor handling, towing and supply
vessels
|
|
(4) |
|
Platform supply vessels
|
|
(5) |
|
Offshore supply vessels
|
|
(6) |
|
Results for these vessel classes
reflect the period from May 2008 to June 2008.
|
Overall
Results
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we reported net
income attributable to Trico Marine Services, Inc. of
$3.4 million on revenues of $301.6 million compared to
net income attributable to Trico Marine Services, Inc. of
$6.7 million on revenues of $163.5 million for the
same period in 2008. The 2009 results include an impairment
charge of $14.0 million related to our withdrawal from the
Volstad partnership, incremental results from the DeepOcean
acquisition in May 2008, two newbuild vessels that were
delivered in the second half of 2008 and a gain realized on the
sale of six vessels in
61
the second quarter of 2009 partially offset by decreases in our
traditional towing and supply operations due to weaknesses in
the Gulf of Mexico and North Sea regions as a consequence of
declines in the overall markets coupled with newbuild vessels
entering the North Sea market.
Segment
Results
Subsea
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
137,562
|
|
|
$
|
50,204
|
|
|
$
|
87,358
|
|
|
|
174
|
%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
113,537
|
|
|
|
35,620
|
|
|
|
77,917
|
|
|
|
219
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
8,142
|
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
6,763
|
|
|
|
490
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17,731
|
|
|
|
5,251
|
|
|
|
12,480
|
|
|
|
238
|
%
|
Impairments
|
|
|
14,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,023
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
153,433
|
|
|
|
42,250
|
|
|
|
111,183
|
|
|
|
263
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(15,871
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,954
|
|
|
$
|
(23,825
|
)
|
|
|
(300
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues increased $87.4 million for the six month period
ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to the acquisition of
DeepOcean in May 2008, which contributed incremental revenues of
$84.4 million. The subsea services segment also includes
revenues of $20.5 million in the first six months of 2009
from SPSVs that were previously part of our towing and supply
segment, representing an increase of $3.8 million compared
to the same period in the prior year. This increase was
primarily due to incremental revenues from two new build vessels
delivered in the second half of 2008.
This segment reported operating losses of $15.9 million for
the six month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to
operating income of $8.0 million for the same prior year
period. This segment primarily includes the results of DeepOcean
and therefore the comparative prior year information is limited.
This includes an impairment charge in the second quarter of 2009
of $14.0 million related to our investment in a partnership
for the construction of a new vessel, the Deep Cygnus. In
the second quarter of 2009, we withdrew from the partnership as
it had been unable to fulfill its commitment to obtain financing
for the remaining amount necessary to purchase the new vessel.
For the six month period ended June 30, 2009 (excluding the
impairment), operating results decreased compared to the same
period in the prior year as this segment was adversely affected
by the loss of 70 days of revenue in the first quarter of
2009 due to mechanical issues on two subsea vessels that are
time chartered from a third-party vessel owner. Additionally,
one of our large subsea vessels, the Atlantic Challenger,
completed an extensive regulatory dry docking after working
for five years in Mexico, which negatively affected our
operating results in the first quarter of 2009.
62
Subsea Trenching
and Protection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
94,403
|
|
|
$
|
15,463
|
|
|
$
|
78,940
|
|
|
|
511
|
%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
65,448
|
|
|
|
13,269
|
|
|
|
52,179
|
|
|
|
393
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
8,580
|
|
|
|
2,269
|
|
|
|
6,311
|
|
|
|
278
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8,712
|
|
|
|
2,427
|
|
|
|
6,285
|
|
|
|
259
|
%
|
Gain on sales of assets
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
82,724
|
|
|
|
17,965
|
|
|
|
64,759
|
|
|
|
360
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
11,679
|
|
|
$
|
(2,502
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,181
|
|
|
|
(567
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This segment was established upon the acquisition of CTC Marine,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of DeepOcean, in May 2008, and
therefore the comparative prior year information is limited.
This segments day rates are a composite daily rate for the
utilization of vessels and assets plus fees for engineering
services, project management services and equipment mobilization
and will vary based on the project complexity, existing
framework agreements with clients, competition and geographic
location. For the six months ended June 30, 2009,
CTCs revenues were $94.4 million and its reported
operating income was $11.7 million. In the six months ended
June 30, 2009, this segments average vessel day rate
was $113,347.
Towing and
Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
69,585
|
|
|
$
|
97,800
|
|
|
$
|
(28,215
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
49,724
|
|
|
|
54,949
|
|
|
|
(5,225
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
10,528
|
|
|
|
11,416
|
|
|
|
(888
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
10,018
|
|
|
|
11,912
|
|
|
|
(1,894
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
Gain on sales of assets
|
|
|
(17,669
|
)
|
|
|
(2,746
|
)
|
|
|
(14,923
|
)
|
|
|
543
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
52,601
|
|
|
|
75,531
|
|
|
|
(22,930
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
16,984
|
|
|
$
|
22,269
|
|
|
$
|
(5,285
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues decreased $28.2 million for the six month period
ended June 30, 2009 and operating income decreased
$5.3 million for the six month period June 30, 2009 as
compared to the same prior year period. Operating income in the
six month period ended June 30, 2009 includes gains on
asset sales of $17.7 million, compared to $2.8 million
in 2008, related to the sale of a PSV in the North Sea and five
OSVs in the Gulf of Mexico. Excluding the asset sales, the
operating income decreases were due to weakness in the Gulf of
Mexico and North Sea regions as a consequence of declines in the
overall markets coupled with newbuild vessels entering the North
Sea market.
63
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
13,579
|
|
|
|
10,643
|
|
|
|
2,936
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
204
|
%
|
Gain on sales of assets
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
13,729
|
|
|
|
10,696
|
|
|
|
3,033
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(13,729
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,696
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,033
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses were $13.7 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $10.7 million for
the same prior year period. The increase in expenses primarily
reflects legal costs related to the proxy contest and increased
personnel and other operating costs to support a substantially
larger company due to the acquisition of DeepOcean in May 2008.
Other
Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
1,862
|
|
|
$
|
4,849
|
|
|
$
|
(2,987
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)%
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(22,578
|
)
|
|
|
(8,286
|
)
|
|
|
(14,292
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
%
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on mark-to-market of embedded derivative
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
(2,310
|
)
|
|
|
3,725
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)%
|
Gain on conversions of debt
|
|
|
11,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,330
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Refinancing costs
|
|
|
(6,224
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,224
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
(1,465
|
)
|
|
|
2,593
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)%
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(18,669
|
)
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
(19,415
|
)
|
|
|
(2,603
|
)%
|
Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(1,264
|
)
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)%
|
Interest Income. Interest income for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 was $1.9 million, a
decrease of $3.0 million compared to the same period in
2008 due to lower cash balances and lower interest rates in the
current year.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased
$14.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008. The increase is attributed
to the debt incurred and assumed when we acquired DeepOcean and
CTC Marine in May 2008. We capitalize interest related to
vessels currently under construction. Capitalized interest for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled
$9.7 million, and $5.8 million for the same period in
2008.
Unrealized Gain on
Mark-to-Market
of Embedded Derivative. SFAS No. 133
requires valuations for our embedded derivatives within our
previous 6.5% Debentures and our new 8.125% Debentures
issued in 2009. The estimated fair value of the embedded
derivatives will fluctuate based upon various factors that
include our common stock closing price, volatility, United
States Treasury bond rates and the time value of options. The
fair value for the 8.125% Debentures will also fluctuate
due to the passage of time. The calculation of the fair value of
the derivatives requires the use of a Monte Carlo simulation
lattice option-pricing model. The fair value of the embedded
derivative associated with our new 8.125% Debentures on the
date of the exchange was $4.7 million. On June 30,
2009, the estimated fair value of the 8.125% Debenture
derivative was $3.7 million resulting in a
$1.0 million
64
unrealized gain for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
embedded derivative on our previous 6.5% Debentures was
revalued on the date of the exchange and the unrealized gain for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $0.4 million.
Gain on Conversions of Debt. During 2009,
various holders of our previous 6.5% Debentures converted
$24.5 million principal amount of the debentures,
collectively, for a combination of $6.9 million in cash
related to the interest make-whole provision and
605,759 shares of our common stock based on an initial
conversion rate of 24.74023 shares of common stock per
$1,000 principal amount of debentures. We recognized gains on
conversions of $11.3 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009.
Refinancing Costs. In connection with the
exchange of our 6.5% Debentures for the
8.125% Debentures, we incurred refinancing costs primarily
related to investment banking and legal costs that are expensed
as incurred under modification accounting which totaled
$6.2 million for the six month period ended June 30,
2009.
Other Income (Expense) Net. Other income
(expense), net of $1.1 million for the six month period
ended June 30, 2009 increased $2.6 million from the
same period in 2008, primarily due to foreign exchange losses as
the U.S. Dollar slightly weakened against most European
currencies during 2009.
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense. Our income tax
(benefit) expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009
was $(18.7) million compared to $0.7 million for the
comparable prior year period. The income tax (benefit) expense
for each period is primarily associated with our
U.S. federal, state and foreign taxes. Our tax benefit for
the six month period ending June 30, 2009 differs from that
under the statutory rate primarily due to tax benefits
associated with the Norwegian tonnage tax regime and a change in
law enacted on March 31, 2009, our permanent reinvestment
of foreign earnings, nondeductible interest expense in the
United States as a result of the 6.5% Debenture exchange
and state and foreign taxes. Absent the $18.6 million
benefit recognized in 2009 related to the Norwegian law change,
we would have expected an annual effective tax rate in 2009 of
(19.2)%. Our effective tax rate is subject to wide variations
given our structure and operations. We operate in many different
taxing jurisdictions with differing rates and tax structures.
Therefore, a change in our overall plan could have a significant
impact on the estimated rate. At June 30, 2009, our tax
expense differed from that under the statutory rate primarily
due to tax benefits associated with the Norwegian tonnage tax
regime, our permanent reinvestment of foreign earnings and state
and foreign taxes. Also impacting our tax expense was a
reduction in Norwegian taxes payable related to a dividend made
between related Norwegian entities during 2008.
Noncontrolling Interest. The noncontrolling
interest in the income of our consolidated subsidiaries was
$1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009,
compared to income of $2.4 million for the same period in
2008.
65
Year Ended
December 31, 2008 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2007
The following table summarizes our consolidated results of
operations for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea services
|
|
$
|
221,838
|
|
|
$
|
31,171
|
|
|
$
|
190,667
|
|
|
|
612
|
%
|
Subsea trenching and protection
|
|
|
123,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,804
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Towing and supply
|
|
|
210,489
|
|
|
|
224,937
|
|
|
|
(14,448
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
556,131
|
|
|
|
256,108
|
|
|
|
300,023
|
|
|
|
117
|
%
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea services
|
|
|
(114,575
|
)
|
|
|
11,594
|
|
|
|
(126,169
|
)
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)%
|
Subsea trenching and protection
|
|
|
(35,264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,264
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Towing and supply
|
|
|
45,875
|
|
|
|
75,483
|
|
|
|
(29,608
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)%
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(23,581
|
)
|
|
|
(20,447
|
)
|
|
|
(3,134
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(127,545
|
)
|
|
|
66,630
|
|
|
|
(194,175
|
)
|
|
|
(291
|
)%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
9,875
|
|
|
|
14,132
|
|
|
|
(4,257
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(35,836
|
)
|
|
|
(7,568
|
)
|
|
|
(28,268
|
)
|
|
|
374
|
%
|
Unrealized gain on
mark-to-market
of embedded derivative
|
|
|
52,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,653
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Gain on conversion of debt
|
|
|
9,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,008
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(1,597
|
)
|
|
|
(3,646
|
)
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(93,442
|
)
|
|
|
69,548
|
|
|
|
(162,990
|
)
|
|
|
(234
|
)%
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(13,422
|
)
|
|
|
(11,808
|
)
|
|
|
(1,614
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(106,864
|
)
|
|
|
57,740
|
|
|
|
(164,604
|
)
|
|
|
(285
|
)%
|
Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(6,791
|
)
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
(9,223
|
)
|
|
|
(379
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Trico Marine Services,
Inc.
|
|
$
|
(113,655
|
)
|
|
$
|
60,172
|
|
|
$
|
(173,827
|
)
|
|
|
(289
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
The following information on day rate, utilization and average
number of vessels is relevant to our revenues and are the
primary drivers of our revenue fluctuations. Our consolidated
fleets average day rates, utilization, and average number
of vessels by vessel class, for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 were follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Average Day Rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPSVs(1)
|
|
$
|
21,691
|
|
|
$
|
17,156
|
|
MSVs(2)
|
|
|
74,919
|
(6)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
155,978
|
(6)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHTSs(3)
|
|
$
|
35,508
|
|
|
$
|
38,813
|
|
PSVs(4)
|
|
|
17,933
|
|
|
|
19,492
|
|
OSVs(5)
|
|
|
7,693
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
Utilization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPSVs
|
|
|
81
|
%
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
MSVs
|
|
|
79
|
%(6)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
93
|
%(6)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHTSs
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
PSVs
|
|
|
92
|
%
|
|
|
89
|
%
|
OSVs
|
|
|
82
|
%
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
Average number of Vessels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPSVs
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
MSVs
|
|
|
9.3
|
(6)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
3.8
|
(6)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHTSs
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
PSVs
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
OSVs
|
|
|
38.1
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Subsea platform supply vessels
|
|
(2) |
|
Multi-purpose service vessels
|
|
(3) |
|
Anchor handling, towing and supply
vessels
|
|
(4) |
|
Platform supply vessels
|
|
(5) |
|
Offshore supply vessels
|
|
(6) |
|
Results for these vessel classes
reflect the period from May 2008 to December 2008.
|
67
Segment
Results
Subsea
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
221,838
|
|
|
$
|
31,171
|
|
|
$
|
190,667
|
|
|
|
612
|
%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
171,554
|
|
|
|
17,403
|
|
|
|
154,151
|
|
|
|
886
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
9,064
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
8,982
|
|
|
|
10,954
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
22,612
|
|
|
|
2,092
|
|
|
|
20,520
|
|
|
|
981
|
%
|
Impairments
|
|
|
133,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,183
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
336,413
|
|
|
|
19,577
|
|
|
|
316,836
|
|
|
|
1,618
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(114,575
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,594
|
|
|
$
|
(126,169
|
)
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues increased $190.7 million primarily due to the
acquisition of DeepOcean in May 2008, which contributed
incremental revenues of $184.9 million in the subsea
services segment in 2008. This segment also includes revenues of
$37.0 million from seven SPSVs that were previously part of
our towing and supply segment, including two new SPSVs delivered
at the end of 2008 that primarily contributed to the SPSV
revenue increase of $5.8 million in 2008 compared to 2007.
In addition, one new MSV was delivered in the third quarter of
2008 to support our subsea services in Norway. The two new SPSVs
are currently under contract in Brazil and Mexico.
Operating loss in 2008 includes a goodwill and intangible
impairment of $133.2 million attributable to the
determination that the Company had no implied fair value for
goodwill based on a combination of factors at the end of 2008
including the global economic environment, higher costs of
equity and debt capital and the decline in market capitalization
of the Parent and comparable subsea services companies.
Excluding this impairment, operating income increased
$7.0 million. As discussed above, the increase in operating
income is primarily due to the DeepOcean acquisition which
contributed $7.2 million of operating income, excluding the
impairments, in the subsea services segment following the
inclusion of DeepOceans results since May 16, 2008.
Subsea Trenching
and Protection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
123,804
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
123,804
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
93,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,137
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
12,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,121
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,153
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Impairments
|
|
|
39,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,657
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
159,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,068
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(35,264
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(35,264
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This segment was established upon the acquisition of CTC Marine,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of DeepOcean in May 2008 and therefore
there is no comparative prior year information. This
segments day rates are a composite rate that can include
the vessel, crew and equipment. Operating loss in 2008 includes
a goodwill and intangible impairment of $39.7 million.
68
Towing and
Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
210,489
|
|
|
$
|
224,937
|
|
|
$
|
(14,448
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
119,193
|
|
|
|
110,074
|
|
|
|
9,119
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
23,590
|
|
|
|
20,536
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
24,487
|
|
|
|
21,625
|
|
|
|
2,862
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
Gain on sales of assets
|
|
|
(2,656
|
)
|
|
|
(2,897
|
)
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
164,614
|
|
|
|
149,454
|
|
|
|
15,160
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
45,875
|
|
|
$
|
75,483
|
|
|
$
|
(29,608
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues decreased $14.4 million, or 6%. Charter hire
revenues decreased $13.4 million in 2008 compared to 2007
due to lower day rates partially offset by increased utilization
for the PSV and OSV class vessels. Day rates were negatively
affected in 2008 by the stronger U.S. Dollar primarily
coupled with a softening Gulf of Mexico market. Higher
utilization for our OSVs in the Gulf of Mexico reflected the
need for vessels in the wake of the hurricanes in August and
September 2008.
Operating income decreased $29.6 million, or 39%,
year-over-year
and operating income margin of 22% was down from 34%. Operating
income includes lower revenues of $14.4 million coupled
with increased costs related to crew costs of $8.0 million
driven by a highly competitive labor market, brokerage fees of
$3.8 million in 2008 related to increased marketing of the
vessels and higher supplies and other operating costs of
$8.3 million due to increased utilization. These decreases
were partially offset by lower mobilization costs of
$3.4 million, lower classification costs of
$4.8 million due to timing and lower maintenance and
repairs of $1.6 million. Additionally, general and
administrative costs increased by $3.1 million primarily
related to expanding and establishing our operations in West
Africa and the negative impact of European currencies
strengthening against the U.S. Dollar during the first half
of 2008.
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
23,410
|
|
|
|
19,784
|
|
|
|
3,626
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
(474
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)%
|
Gain on sales of assets
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
23,581
|
|
|
|
20,447
|
|
|
|
3,134
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(23,581
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,447
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,134
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in corporate expenses of $3.1 million in 2008
compared to 2007 reflects costs associated with the acquisition
of DeepOcean and CTC Marine, personnel increases to support a
substantially larger company due to the acquisition, changes in
management personnel throughout our organization.
69
Other
Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
$
|
9,875
|
|
|
$
|
14,132
|
|
|
$
|
(4,257
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
|
|
|
(35,836
|
)
|
|
|
(7,568
|
)
|
|
|
(28,268
|
)
|
|
|
374
|
%
|
Unrealized Gain on
Mark-to-Market
of Embedded Derivative
|
|
|
52,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,653
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Gain on Conversion of Debt
|
|
|
9,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,008
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Other Expense, Net
|
|
|
(1,597
|
)
|
|
|
(3,646
|
)
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)%
|
Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
(13,422
|
)
|
|
|
(11,808
|
)
|
|
|
(1,614
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Net (Income) Loss Attributable to the Noncontrolling Interest
|
|
|
(6,791
|
)
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
(9,223
|
)
|
|
|
(379
|
)%
|
Interest Income. Interest income for 2008 was
$9.9 million, a decrease of $4.3 million compared to
2007, reflecting our use of available cash to partially fund the
acquisition of DeepOcean.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased
$28.3 million in 2008 compared to 2007. The increase is
attributed to the debt incurred in acquiring DeepOcean and CTC
Marine as well as assuming $281.7 million of
DeepOceans and CTC Marines debt in the acquisition.
Prior to the incurrence of this new debt and assumption of the
DeepOcean and CTC Marine debt, a large portion of our interest
was being capitalized in connection with the construction of the
MPSVs (from the acquisition of the Active Subsea vessels in
November 2007) and the two vessels that were delivered to us,
one in each of the third and fourth quarters of 2008.
Capitalized interest totaled $18.8 million and
$1.4 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Unrealized Gain on
Mark-to-Market
of Embedded Derivative. On December 31,
2008, the estimated fair value of the derivative within our
6.5% Debentures was $1.1 million resulting in a
$52.7 million unrealized gain for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The change in our stock price, coupled
with the passage of time, are the primary factors influencing
the change in value of these derivatives and the impact on our
net income (loss) attributable to Trico Marine Services, Inc.
Any increase in our stock price will result in unrealized losses
being recognized in future periods and such amounts could be
material.
Gain on Conversion of Debt. In December 2008,
two holders of our 6.5% Debentures converted
$22 million principal amount of the debentures,
collectively, for a combination of $6.3 million in cash
related to the interest make-whole provision and
544,284 shares of our common stock based on the initial
conversion rate of 24.74023 shares for each $1,000 in
principal amount of debentures. We recognized a gain on
conversion of $9.0 million.
Other Expense, Net. Other expense, net
decreased $2.0 million in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily
due to foreign exchange gains as the U.S. Dollar
strengthened against most European currencies during the course
of 2008. These gains were partially offset by a foreign currency
swap agreement that we settled in June 2008 that was assumed in
the acquisition of DeepOcean. Upon settlement, we received net
proceeds of $8.2 million, which was approximately
$2.5 million less than the swap instruments fair value on
May 16, 2008. This $2.5 million shortfall was recorded
as a charge to Other Expense, net.
Income Tax Expense. Consolidated income tax
expense for 2008 was $13.4 million, which is primarily
related to the income generated by our U.S., West African and
Norwegian operations. Our effective tax rate was (14.4%) for the
year ended December 31, 2008 which differs from the
statutory rate primarily due to tax benefits associated with the
Norwegian tonnage tax regime, our permanent reinvestment of
foreign earnings, state and foreign taxes and the impairment of
goodwill and certain intangibles that are not deductible for tax
purposes. Also impacting our effective tax rate was a reduction
in Norwegian taxes payable related to a dividend made between
related Norwegian entities
70
during the first quarter of 2008. Our effective tax rate is
subject to wide variations given our structure and operations.
We operate in many different taxing jurisdictions with differing
rates and tax structures. Therefore, a change in our overall
plan could have a significant impact on the estimated rate.
Noncontrolling Interest. The noncontrolling
interest in the income of our consolidated subsidiaries was
$6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
compared to a loss of $2.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007. In 2008, Eastern Marine Services
Limiteds, or EMSL, operations benefited from the vessels
it received in 2007. In 2007, EMSL operations resulted in a loss
primarily as a result of its receipt of vessels, including
drydock completions and mobilization of five cold-stacked supply
vessels.
Year Ended
December 31, 2007 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2006
The following table summarizes our consolidated results of
operations for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea services
|
|
$
|
31,171
|
|
|
$
|
26,333
|
|
|
$
|
4,838
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Towing and supply
|
|
|
224,937
|
|
|
|
222,384
|
|
|
|
2,553
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
256,108
|
|
|
|
248,717
|
|
|
|
7,391
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Operating income and (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea and services
|
|
|
11,594
|
|
|
|
14,118
|
|
|
|
(2,524
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)%
|
Towing and supply
|
|
|
75,483
|
|
|
|
84,405
|
|
|
|
(8,922
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(20,447
|
)
|
|
|
(10,133
|
)
|
|
|
(10,314
|
)
|
|
|
102
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
|
66,630
|
|
|
|
88,390
|
|
|
|
(21,760
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
14,132
|
|
|
|
4,198
|
|
|
|
9,934
|
|
|
|
237
|
%
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(7,568
|
)
|
|
|
(1,286
|
)
|
|
|
(6,282
|
)
|
|
|
488
|
%
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(3,646
|
)
|
|
|
(840
|
)
|
|
|
(2,806
|
)
|
|
|
334
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
69,548
|
|
|
|
90,462
|
|
|
|
(20,914
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)%
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(11,808
|
)
|
|
|
(33,723
|
)
|
|
|
21,915
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
57,740
|
|
|
|
56,739
|
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
1,985
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Trico Marine Services, Inc.
|
|
$
|
60,172
|
|
|
$
|
58,724
|
|
|
$
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
Our consolidated fleets average day rates, utilization,
and average number of vessels by vessel class, for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Average Day Rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPSVs(1)
|
|
$
|
17,156
|
|
|
$
|
15,715
|
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHTSs(2)
|
|
$
|
38,813
|
|
|
$
|
28,164
|
|
PSVs(3)
|
|
|
19,492
|
|
|
|
14,219
|
|
OSVs(4)
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
11,184
|
|
Utilization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPSVs
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHTSs
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
|
|
92
|
%
|
PSVs
|
|
|
89
|
%
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
OSVs
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
Average number of Vessels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPSVs
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHTSs
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
PSVs
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
OSVs
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Subsea platform supply vessels
|
|
(2) |
|
Anchor handling, towing and supply
vessels
|
|
(3) |
|
Platform supply vessels
|
|
(4) |
|
Offshore supply vessels
|
Segment
Results
Subsea
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
31,171
|
|
|
$
|
26,333
|
|
|
$
|
4,838
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
17,403
|
|
|
|
9,744
|
|
|
|
7,659
|
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,092
|
|
|
|
2,471
|
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
19,577
|
|
|
|
12,215
|
|
|
|
7,362
|
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
11,594
|
|
|
$
|
14,118
|
|
|
$
|
(2,524
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues for the subsea services segment increased
$4.8 million in 2007, or 18%. All revenues are from charter
hire and the increase reflects the 8% increase in the SPSV
average day rate due primarily to the renewal of a long-term
contract at a 40% higher day rate offset by a slight decrease in
average utilization for the year.
72
Operating income in the subsea services segment decreased
$2.5 million in 2007, or 18%,
year-over-year
and operating income margin of 37% was down from 54%. The
increase in revenues of $4.8 million was more than offset
by the following costs: increased classification costs of
$3.2 million which is incurred based on regulatory
timelines; increased supplies and repairs and maintenance costs
of $3.1 million due to continued high utilization of
vessels; and increased crew labor cost of $1.1 million
driven by a highly competitive labor market and a weaker
U.S. Dollar.
Subsea Trenching and Protection. We did not
have any subsea trenching and protection operations in 2007 or
2006.
Towing and
Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
224,937
|
|
|
$
|
222,384
|
|
|
$
|
2,553
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
110,074
|
|
|
|
97,198
|
|
|
|
12,876
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
20,536
|
|
|
|
17,188
|
|
|
|
3,348
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
21,625
|
|
|
|
22,347
|
|
|
|
(722
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
Impairments
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Loss on sales of assets
|
|
|
(2,897
|
)
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
(4,143
|
)
|
|
|
(333
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
149,454
|
|
|
|
137,979
|
|
|
|
11,475
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
75,483
|
|
|
$
|
84,405
|
|
|
$
|
(8,922
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our revenues in our towing and supply segment increased
$2.6 million in 2007, or 1%. Charter hire revenues
increased $3.8 million in 2007 compared to 2006 primarily
driven by increased day rates for this segments AHTSs and
PSVs due to strong spot market rates for the AHTSs and a
favorable exchange rate in the North Sea due to the weakening
U.S. Dollar. For this segments OSV vessels, the
decrease in day rates in 2007 compared to 2006 can be attributed
to overall decreased activity in the Gulf of Mexico as more
shallow water
jack-up rigs
left the region to work in other parts of the world. As a
result, we redeployed a portion of our Gulf of Mexico fleet to
other geographic areas, primarily West Africa and Mexico, and we
also entered into longer-term contracts with marginally lower
average day rates. Amortization of non-cash deferred revenues
decreased $3.4 million in 2007 compared to 2006 due to the
expiration of certain unfavorable contracts recorded at the date
we exited bankruptcy in 2005 (the exit date). This deferred
revenue resulted from several of our contracts being deemed to
be unfavorable compared to market conditions on the exit date,
thus creating a liability required to be amortized as revenues
over the remaining contract periods. Other vessel income
increased $2.2 million for the same period mainly due to
increased bed and bunk revenues in the North Sea and West
Africa, where this segment continues to redeploy vessels.
Operating income in our towing and supply segment decreased
$8.9 million, or 11%,
year-over-year
and our operating income margin of 34% was down from 38%. The
increase in revenues of $2.6 million was more than offset
by the following costs: increased mobilization and supply costs
of $7.9 million in connection with redeploying vessels to
international markets; increased repairs and maintenance costs
of $5.2 million primarily related to continued high
utilization of vessels; and increased crew labor cost of
$7.2 million driven by a highly competitive labor market
and a weaker U.S. Dollar; partially offset by decreased
classification costs of $6.7 million. Additionally, general
and administrative costs increased by $3.3 million
primarily related to expanding and establishing our operations
in Southeast Asia/China and West Africa.
73
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
19,784
|
|
|
|
9,914
|
|
|
|
9,870
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
263
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
20,447
|
|
|
|
10,133
|
|
|
|
10,314
|
|
|
|
102
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(20,447
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,133
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,314
|
)
|
|
|
102
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in corporate expenses of $10.3 million, or
102%, in 2007 compared to 2006 primarily related to compensation
expense and non-cash stock-based compensation expense primarily
due to changes in executive management, costs associated with
global information system upgrades and professional fees
associated with the successful proxy contest and pursuit of
acquisitions that did not materialize.
Other
Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
$
|
14,132
|
|
|
$
|
4,198
|
|
|
$
|
9,934
|
|
|
|
237
|
%
|
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
|
|
|
(7,568
|
)
|
|
|
(1,286
|
)
|
|
|
(6,282
|
)
|
|
|
488
|
%
|
Other Expense, Net
|
|
|
(3,646
|
)
|
|
|
(840
|
)
|
|
|
(2,806
|
)
|
|
|
334
|
%
|
Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
(11,808
|
)
|
|
|
(33,723
|
)
|
|
|
21,915
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)%
|
Net (Income) Loss Attributable to the Noncontrolling Interest
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
1,985
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Interest Income. Interest income for 2007 was
$14.1 million, an increase of $9.9 million compared to
2006, primarily due to interest earned on higher levels of cash
equivalents resulting from proceeds related to the
$150.0 million convertible debenture offering in February
2007 and cash flows from operations invested in marketable
securities.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased
$6.3 million in 2007 compared to 2006 primarily due to
interest incurred on our $150.0 million 3% senior
convertible debentures issued in February 2007, offset by
capitalized interest of $1.4 million in 2007 compared to
$0.3 million in 2006 primarily related to vessel
construction in Norway.
Other Expense, Net. Other Expense, Net
increased $2.8 million in 2007 compared to 2006 primarily
due to foreign exchange losses incurred in our Norwegian legal
entities that are Norwegian Kroner functional, on
U.S. Dollar balances of receivables and cash held
throughout 2007 as the U.S. Dollar declined 10% during the
course of 2007 against the Norwegian Kroner.
Income Tax Expense. We recognized a full
valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets in 2007.
Consolidated income tax expense for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was $11.8 million, which is
primarily related to the income generated by our
U.S. operations. Our 2007 effective tax rate of 17.0%
differs from the statutory rate of 35% primarily due to tax
benefits associated with the Norwegian tonnage tax regime,
retrospectively enacted as of January 1, 2007, our
permanent reinvestment of foreign earnings, and state and
foreign taxes. Note 11 to our consolidated financial
statements contains a more detailed discussion of enacted
changes in Norways tax laws. The $11.8 million of
income tax expense in 2007 includes a $7.0 million deferred
tax charge with an offset to additional
paid-in-capital
due to the utilization of net operating loss that existed at the
exit date. The
74
offset to additional
paid-in-capital
is required under the fresh-start accounting rules because of
the valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset at
the exit date.
Consolidated income tax expense for 2006 was $33.7 million,
which is primarily related to the income generated by our
U.S. and Norwegian operations. The $33.7 million of
income tax expense in 2006 includes a $16.6 million
deferred tax charge with an offset to additional
paid-in-capital
due to the utilization of Net Operating Loss that existed at the
exit date. The offset to additional
paid-in-capital
is required under the fresh-start accounting rules because of
the valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset at
the exit date.
Noncontrolling Interest. The noncontrolling
interest in loss of consolidated subsidiaries of
$2.4 million and $2.0 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, primarily
represents our noncontrolling interests share of
EMSLs loss partially offset by our noncontrolling
interests share of our Mexican partnerships income.
The losses in EMSL are primarily a result of business
start-up,
mobilization and maintenance and classification costs incurred
to destack the five cold-stacked supply vessels to be mobilized
to Southeast Asia / China.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
Overview
At June 30, 2009, we had available cash of
$35.1 million. This amount and other amounts in this
section reflecting U.S. Dollar equivalents for foreign
denominated debt amounts are translated at currency rates in
effect at June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, payments
due on our contractual obligations during the next twelve months
were approximately $416 million. This includes $188 million
of debt, $137 million of time charter obligations,
$49 million of vessel construction obligations (including
approximately $9 million associated with the remaining four
MPSVs which Trico has the option to cancel after July 15,
2010), $36 million of estimated interest expense, and
approximately $7 million of other operating expenses such
as taxes, operating leases, and pension obligations. In
addition, payments of approximately $102 million must be
paid to the lenders under our NOK 350 million revolving
credit facility, NOK 230 million revolving credit facility,
NOK 150 million additional term loan and NOK
200 million overdraft facility on January 1, 2010.
These amounts are included in the debt that is classified as
current as of June 30, 2009. We also have
$31.5 million of additional debt associated with our
U.S. credit facility maturing in July 2010. We also expect
to make significant additional capital expenditures over the
next twelve months. However, we have canceled delivery of the
Deep Cygnus, a large newbuild vessel, thereby terminating
our obligation to fund $41.6 million in capital
expenditures and completed negotiations with Tebma to suspend
construction of the remaining four newbuild MPSVs (the Trico
Surge, Trico Sovereign, Trico Seeker and Trico
Searcher). Trico holds the option to cancel construction of
the four new build MPSVs after July 15, 2010, which would
reduce our committed future capital expenditures to
approximately $40 million on the three MPSVs we expect to
take delivery of by the third quarter of 2010.
As a result of these events, we believe that our forecasted cash
flows and available credit capacity are not sufficient to meet
our commitments as they come due over the next twelve months and
that we will not be able to remain in compliance with our debt
covenants unless we are able to successfully refinance certain
debt. We are pursuing the Refinancing Transactions to refinance
a large portion of our debt. If we successfully complete this
offering of notes and the sale of the Northern Clipper,
our current maturities as of June 30, 2009 will be
$1.7 million (all of which will be at the Parent level);
and we expect to have approximately $35.1 million of cash
and equivalents plus undrawn credit facility capacity
of $50.9 million. We also expect to receive approximately
$17 million in net cash proceeds in the fourth quarter from
the sale of the Northern Challenger, for which we
previously announced a signed sale contract. If we fail to
complete the Refinancing Transactions successfully, we will
continue our current dialogues with our lenders to amend our
existing facilities and our efforts to reduce debt outstanding
through asset sales and negotiations with holders of our
convertible debentures.
75
If none of these approaches are successful in refinancing
certain debt, we would not be able to remain in compliance with
our debt covenants; and we would be in default under our credit
agreements, which, in turn, would constitute an event of default
under all of our outstanding debt agreements. If this were to
occur, all of our outstanding debt would become callable by our
creditors and would be reclassified as a current liability on
our balance sheet. Our inability to repay the outstanding debt,
if it were to become current or if it were called by our
creditors, would have a material adverse effect on us and raises
substantial doubt about Tricos ability to continue as a
going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do not
include any adjustment related to the recoverability and
classification of recorded assets or the amounts and
classification of liabilities that might result from this
uncertainty.
Our ability to generate or access cash is subject to events
beyond our control, such as declines in expenditures for
exploration, development and production activity, reduction in
global consumption of refined petroleum products, general
economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and
other factors. In light of the current financial turmoil, we may
be exposed to credit risk relating to our credit facilities to
the extent our lenders may be unable or unwilling to provide
necessary funding in accordance with their commitments.
Depending on the market demand for our vessels and other growth
opportunities that may arise, we may require additional debt or
equity financing. The ability to raise additional indebtedness
may be restricted by the terms of the 8.125% Debentures and
the notes being sold pursuant to this offering, which
restrictions include a prohibition on incurring certain types of
indebtedness if our leverage exceeds a certain level.
The credit markets have been volatile and are experiencing a
shortage in overall liquidity. We have assessed the potential
impact on various aspects of our operations, including, but not
limited to, the continued availability and general
creditworthiness of our debt and financial instrument
counterparties, the impact of market developments on customers
and insurers, and the general recoverability and realizability
of certain financial assets, including customer receivables. To
date, we have not suffered material losses due to nonperformance
by our counterparties.
Our indirect subsidiaries, DeepOcean AS, CTC Marine Projects and
DeepOcean Shipping II AS are prohibited under the terms of the
loan agreements with Sparebank 1 SR-Bank (SR
Bank) from paying dividends to their respective parents
and from lending funds via intercompany loans to other
subsidiaries. In the event we are unsuccessful in completing the
Refinancing Transactions, completing an alternative transaction,
or negotiating the extension of this debt, the inability to
transfer funds from these material subsidiaries may impact the
ability of Trico Shipping, Trico Supply and Trico Marine
Services to meet their obligations including debt service.
Other
Liquidity Items
In the first six months of 2009, various holders of our
6.5% Debentures initiated conversions which converted
$24.5 million principal amount of the debentures,
collectively, for a combination of $6.9 million in cash
related to the interest make-whole provision and
605,759 shares of our common stock based on the conversion
rate of 24.74023 shares of common stock per $1,000
principal amount of debentures.
On May 11, 2009, we entered into the Exchange Agreements
with all of the remaining holders of the 6.5% Debentures.
Pursuant to these Exchange Agreements, all holders exchanged
each $1,000 in principal amount of the 6.5% Debentures for
$800 in principal amount of the 8.125% Debentures, $50 in
cash and 12 shares of our common stock (or warrants to
purchase shares at $0.01 per share in lieu thereof). Among the
more important features of the new 8.125% Debentures is the
elimination of the obligation to make interest make-whole
payments prior to May 1, 2011 and the ability to satisfy
amortization requirements in equity. At closing, we exchanged
$253.5 million in aggregate principal amount of the
6.5% Debentures and accrued but unpaid interest thereon for
$12.7 million in cash, 360,696 shares of our common
stock, warrants exercisable for 2,681,484 shares of our
common stock
76
and $202.8 million in aggregate principal amount of
8.125% Debentures. The exchange reduced the principal
amount of our outstanding debt by $50.7 million.
On April 28, 2009, we sold a PSV for $26.0 million in
net proceeds. The sale of this vessel required a prepayment of
approximately $14.9 million for our $200 million
revolving credit facility as the vessel served as security for
that facility. During June 2009, we sold five OSVs for a total
of $3.8 million. The sale of these vessels did not require
a debt prepayment.
Our debt is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Parent and non-guarantor subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$50 million US Credit Facility Agreement maturing in
July 15, 2010
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
26,509
|
|
|
$
|
31,509
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
36,460
|
|
|
$
|
46,460
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
$202.8 million face amount, 8.125% Convertible
Debentures, net of unamortized discount of $14.6 million as
of June 30, 2009, interest payable semi-annually in
arrears, maturing on February 1, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,191
|
|
|
|
188,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$278.0 million face amount, 6.5% Senior Convertible
Debentures, net of unamortized discount of $45 million as
of December 31, 2008, interest payable semi-annually in
arrears, exchanged in May 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,998
|
|
|
|
232,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
$150.0 million face amount, 3.0% Senior Convertible
Debentures, net of unamortized discount of $33.0 million
and $35.9 million as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively, interest payable
semi-annually in arrears, maturing on January 15, 2027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,006
|
|
|
|
117,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,150
|
|
|
|
114,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.11% Notes, principal and interest due in 30 semi-annual
installments, maturing April 2014
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
|
6,286
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
5,657
|
|
|
|
6,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Note
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-start debt premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Parent and non-guarantor subsidiaries debt
|
|
|
6,731
|
|
|
|
337,016
|
|
|
|
343,747
|
|
|
|
11,258
|
|
|
|
389,577
|
|
|
|
400,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trico Supply Group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOK 350 million Revolving Credit Facility, maturing
January 1, 2010
|
|
|
59,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,790
|
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
57,931
|
|
|
|
61,531
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
NOK 230 million Revolving Credit Facility, maturing
January 1, 2010
|
|
|
17,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,940
|
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
|
|
18,939
|
|
|
|
21,233
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
NOK 150 million Additional Term Loan, maturing
January 1, 2010
|
|
|
9,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,428
|
|
|
|
3,644
|
|
|
|
6,754
|
|
|
|
10,398
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
NOK 200 million Overdraft Facility, maturing
January 1, 2010
|
|
|
14,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
23.3 million Euro Revolving Credit Facility, maturing
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
19,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,717
|
|
|
|
19,717
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
NOK 260 million Short Term Credit Facility, interest at
9.9%, maturing on February 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
$200 million Revolving Credit Facility maturing May 2013
|
|
|
36,283
|
|
|
|
100,052
|
|
|
|
136,335
|
|
|
|
30,563
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
160,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
$100 million Revolving Credit Facility maturing no later
than December 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,550
|
|
|
|
36,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
$18 million Revolving Credit Facility, maturing
December 5, 2011
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
8 million Sterling Overdraft Facility, maturing
364 days after drawdown
|
|
|
12,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,491
|
|
|
|
9,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.2 million Sterling Asset Financing Revolving Credit
Facility, maturing no later than December 31, 2014
|
|
|
3,659
|
|
|
|
14,046
|
|
|
|
17,705
|
|
|
|
3,238
|
|
|
|
14,048
|
|
|
|
17,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Finance lease obligations assumed in the acquisition of
DeepOcean, maturing from October 2009 to Nov-15
|
|
|
2,228
|
|
|
|
11,854
|
|
|
|
14,082
|
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
|
11,947
|
|
|
|
14,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt assumed in the acquisition of DeepOcean
|
|
|
2,545
|
|
|
|
4,771
|
|
|
|
7,316
|
|
|
|
2,716
|
|
|
|
5,979
|
|
|
|
8,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Trico Supply Group debt
|
|
|
180,803
|
|
|
|
180,273
|
|
|
|
361,076
|
|
|
|
71,723
|
|
|
|
297,522
|
|
|
|
369,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Parent and non-guarantor subsidiaries and Trico Supply
Group debt
|
|
$
|
187,534
|
|
|
$
|
517,289
|
|
|
$
|
704,823
|
|
|
$
|
82,981
|
|
|
$
|
687,099
|
|
|
$
|
770,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We were in compliance with our
maximum consolidated leverage ratio as of December 31,
2008, March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009. In August
2009, we entered into an amendment whereby the maximum
consolidated leverage was increased from 4.5:1 to 5.0:1 for the
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009. We received
prospective covenant relief increasing the ratio from 4.5:1 to
5.0:1 for September 30, 2009. The ratio will revert back to
the contractual terms for future periods.
|
|
(2) |
|
These debt agreements contain
material adverse change provisions. These provisions allow the
lenders to declare an event of default if in their sole and
reasonable opinion, a deterioration in the financial condition
of the borrower will have a negative effect on its ability to
meet its obligations.
|
78
The following table summarizes the financial covenants under our
debt facilities at June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
Lender(s)
|
|
Borrower
|
|
Entity Guarantor
|
|
Financial Covenants
|
|
8.125% Senior Convertible Debentures
|
|
Various
|
|
Trico Marine Services, Inc.
|
|
None
|
|
No maintenance covenants
|
3.0% Senior Convertible Debentures
|
|
Various
|
|
Trico Marine Services, Inc.
|
|
None
|
|
No maintenance covenants
|
6.11% Notes
|
|
Various
|
|
Trico Marine International, Inc.
|
|
Trico Marine Services, Inc. and U.S. Maritime Administration
|
|
No maintenance covenants
|
$200m Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Nordea Bank Finland PLC/ Bayerische Hypo Und
Vereinsbank AG (HVB)
|
|
Trico Shipping AS
|
|
Trico Supply AS
|
|
(1), (2), (3),
(4)
|
$100m Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Nordea Bank Finland PLC/ Bayerische Hypo Und
Vereinsbank AG (HVB)
|
|
Trico Subsea AS
|
|
Trico Supply AS
|
|
(1), (2), (3),
(4)
|
$50m U.S. Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Nordea Bank Finland PLC/ Bayerische Hypo Und
Vereinsbank AG (HVB)
|
|
Trico Marine Services, Inc.
|
|
Trico Marine Assets, Inc., Trico Marine Operators, Inc.
|
|
(5), (2), (3),
(6)
|
NOK 350m Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
SR Bank
|
|
DeepOcean Shipping II
|
|
DeepOcean AS
|
|
(7) (8),
(9)
|
NOK 230m Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
SR Bank
|
|
DeepOcean AS
|
|
None
|
|
(7) (8),
(9)
|
23.3 Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Nordea Bank Norge ASA
|
|
DeepOcean Shipping III
|
|
Trico Supply AS
|
|
(1), (2),
(3)
|
NOK 150m Additional Term Loan
|
|
SR Bank
|
|
DeepOcean AS
|
|
None
|
|
(7) (8),
(9)
|
$18m Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Nordea Bank Norge PLC
|
|
DeepOcean Shipping
|
|
Trico Supply AS
|
|
(1), (2),
(3)
|
£8m Overdraft Facility
|
|
Barclays Bank PLC
|
|
CTC Marine Projects Ltd
|
|
DeepOcean AS (partial up to 100m NOK)
|
|
None
|
£24.2m Asset Financing Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Barclays Bank PLC
|
|
CTC Marine Projects Ltd
|
|
DeepOcean AS (partial up to 100m NOK)
|
|
None
|
NOK 200m Overdraft Facility
|
|
SR Bank
|
|
DeepOcean AS
|
|
None
|
|
(7) (8),
(9)
|
Finance Leases
|
|
SR Bank
|
|
DeepOcean AS
|
|
None
|
|
No maintenance covenants
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consolidated Leverage Ratio: Net
Debt to 12 month rolling EBITDA* less than or equal to
3.50:1 calculated at the Entity Guarantor level (with respect to
the Guarantor party identified in the applicable row of the
table above)
|
|
(2) |
|
Consolidated Net Worth
minimum net worth of Borrower (if Trico Marine Services) or
Entity Guarantor
|
|
(3) |
|
Free Liquidity minimum
unrestricted cash and / or unutilized loan commitments at
Borrower (with respect to the Borrower party identified in the
applicable row of the table above) or Entity Guarantor
|
|
(4) |
|
Collateral coverage
appraised value of collateral (vessels) must exceed 150% of
amount outstanding and amount available
|
|
(5) |
|
Consolidated Leverage Ratio: Net
Debt to 12 month rolling EBITDA* less than or equal to 4.50
for the quarter ending June 30, 2009. In August 2009, the
ratio was changed to 5.00 for the quarter ending
September 30, 2009. The consolidated leverage ratios for
the remaining periods remain at 4.50 for the quarter ending
December 31, 2009 and 4.00 for any quarters thereafter.
Calculated at the Borrower level
|
79
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Maintenance Capital
Expenditures limits the amount of maintenance
capital expenditures in any given fiscal year
|
|
(7) |
|
Book Equity Ratio Book
Equity divided by Book Assets must exceed 35%. Calculated at the
Entity Guarantor level
|
|
(8) |
|
Leverage Ratio Net
Interest Bearing Debt divided by EBITDA** must be lower than
3:1. Calculated at the Entity Guarantors or
Borrowers level (as the case may be)
|
|
(9) |
|
Working Capital Ratio
Current Assets must be greater than Current Liabilities
(excluding short-term maturities of debt)
|
|
*
|
|
EBITDA is defined under notes
(1) and (5) as Consolidated Net Income attributable to
Trico Marine Services, Inc. before deducting therefrom
(i) interest expense, (ii) provisions for taxes based
on income included in Consolidated Net Income attributable to
Trico Marine Services, Inc., (iii) amortization and
depreciation without giving any effect to (x) any
extraordinary gains or extraordinary non-cash losses and
(y) any gains or losses from sales of assets other than the
sale of inventory in the ordinary course or business. Prior to
December 31, 2009, pro-forma adjustments shall be made for
any vessels delivered during the period as if such vessels were
acquired or delivered on the first day of the relevant
12 month test period. Calculated at the Entity Guarantor or
Borrowers level (as the case may be).
|
|
**
|
|
EBITDA is defined under
note (8), on a consolidated basis, as the Guarantors
or the Borrowers (as the case may be) earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and any gain or loss
from the sale of assets or other extraordinary gains or losses.
|
Note: Other covenant related definitions are defined in the
respective credit agreements as previously filed with the SEC.
Our most restrictive covenants are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
|
Requirement as of
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Requirement to be Met
|
Facility
|
|
Financial Covenant
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
2009
Results(1)
|
|
on September 30, 2009
|
|
$50 million U.S. Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Consolidated Leverage Ratio
|
|
Net Debt to 12 month rolling EBITDA less than or equal to
4:50:1
|
|
3.54
|
|
Net Debt to 12 month rolling EBITDA less than or equal to
5:00:1
|
NOK 350m Revolving Credit Facility; NOK 230m Revolving Credit
Facility; NOK 150m Additional Term Loan; NOK 200m Overdraft
Facility
|
|
Working Capital Ratio
|
|
Current assets divided by current liabilities must be higher
than 1.1
|
|
1.11
|
|
Current assets divided by current liabilities must be higher
than 1.1
|
$200 million Revolving Credit Facility and $100 million
Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Consolidated Leverage Ratio
|
|
Net Debt to 12 month rolling EBITDA less than or equal to
3.50:1
|
|
3.18
|
|
Net Debt to 12 month rolling EBITDA less than or equal to
3.50:1
|
$200 million Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Free Liquidity
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents must exceed $10 million
|
|
$19.5 million
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents must exceed $10 million
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We are in compliance with our debt
covenants at June 30, 2009. Please see Risk
Factors for more details about potential risks involving
these facilities. Amounts in this section reflecting U.S. Dollar
equivalents for foreign denominated debt amounts are translated
at currency rates in effect at June 30, 2009. We expect to
be in compliance with our debt covenants at September 30,
2009.
|
80
In addition to the covenants described above, our
8.125% Debentures limit our ability to incur additional
indebtedness if the Consolidated Leverage Ratio exceeds 4 to 1
at the time of incurrence of such indebtedness.
Cross Default
Provisions.
Our debt facilities contain significant cross default and/or
cross acceleration provisions where a default under one facility
could enable the lenders under other facilities to also declare
events of default and accelerate repayment of our obligations
under these facilities. In general, these cross
default / cross acceleration provisions are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The 8.125% Debentures and the 3.0% Debentures contain
provisions where the debt holders may declare an event of
default and require immediate repayment if repayment of certain
other indebtedness in a principal amount in excess of
$30 million or its foreign currency equivalent has been
accelerated and not remedied within 30 days after notice
thereof.
|
|
|
|
The $50 million Parent credit facility allows the lenders
to declare an event of default and require immediate repayment
if we or any of our subsidiaries were to be in default on more
than $10 million in other indebtedness.
|
|
|
|
The $100 million credit agreement and the $200 million credit
agreement allow the lenders to declare an event of default and
require immediate repayment if Trico Supply AS or any of its
subsidiaries were to be in default on more than $10 million
in other indebtedness.
|
|
|
|
Under the debt facilities where DeepOcean AS or DeepOcean
Shipping II are the borrowers, the lender may declare an
event of default and require immediate repayment if other
indebtedness becomes due and payable prior to its specified
maturity as a result of an event of default.
|
|
|
|
The $18 million revolving credit facility allows the lender
to declare an event of default and require immediate repayment
if the borrower (DeepOcean Shipping) or the guarantor (Trico
Supply AS) is in default on more than $1,000,000 or $5,000,000,
respectively, in other indebtedness.
|
|
|
|
The 23.3 million revolving credit facility allows the
lender to declare an event of default if the borrower defaults
under any other agreement and in the reasonable opinion of the
lender, this default would have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition of the borrower.
|
|
|
|
The £8 million overdraft facility and the
£24.2 million asset financing revolving credit
facility contain cross default provisions where it is an event
of default if borrower (CTC) defaults on its own debt.
|
Recent
Amendments and Waivers
|
|
|
|
|
In August 2009, we entered into an amendment to our
$50 million Parent revolving credit facility whereby
the maximum consolidated leverage ratio, net debt to EBITDA, was
increased from 4.5:1 to 5.0:1 for the fiscal quarter ending
September 30, 2009. The consolidated leverage ratios for
the remaining periods were not amended and remain at 4.5:1 for
the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2009 and 4.0:1.0 for
any fiscal quarter ending after December 31, 2009. In
connection with this amendment, the margin was increased from
3.25% to 5.0%. The total commitment under this facility has also
been permanently reduced to $35 million.
|
|
|
|
In April 2009, we received a waiver of the leverage ratios under
the NOK 350 million Revolving Credit Facility, NOK
230 million Revolving Credit Facility, NOK 150 million
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Term Loan and the NOK 200 million Overdraft
Facility. In exchange for the waiver, the margin on each
facility referenced above was increased to 275 bps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2009, we entered into a series of retroactive
amendments to change the method of calculating the minimum net
worth covenant for each of the $200 million Revolving
Credit Facility, the $100 million Revolving Credit
Facility, the $18 million Revolving Credit Facility, the
23.3 million Euro Revolving Credit Facility and the
$50 million Parent credit facility. These amendments
adjusted the calculation of net worth in order to permanently
eliminate the negative effect on net worth of any non-cash
goodwill adjustments including that which was included in the
December 31, 2008 financial statements. Subsequent to this
adjustment, we were in compliance with theses net worth
covenants as of December 31, 2008.
|
Our Capital
Requirements
Our on-going capital requirements arise primarily from our need
to improve and enhance our current service offerings, invest in
upgrades of existing vessels, acquire new vessels and provide
working capital to support our operating activities and service
debt. Generally, we provide working capital to our operating
locations through two primary business locations: the North Sea
and the U.S. The North Sea and the U.S. business
operations have been capitalized and are financed on a
stand-alone basis. Debt covenants and U.S. and Norwegian
tax laws make it difficult for us to efficiently transfer the
financial resources from one of these locations for the benefit
of the other.
As a result of changes in Norwegian tax laws in 2007, all
accumulated untaxed shipping profits generated between 1996 and
December 31, 2006 in our tonnage tax company will be
subject to tax at 28%. Two-thirds of the liability
($35.3 million) is payable in equal installments over
9 years. The remaining one-third of the liability
($18.6 million) can be met through qualified environmental
expenditures. As a result of changes in Norwegian tax laws
during the first quarter of 2009, we recognized a one-time tax
benefit in earnings of $18.6 million. There is no time
constraint on making any qualified environmental expenditures in
satisfaction of the $18.6 million liability.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our material contractual
commitments at June 30, 2009. In the second quarter of
2009, we withdrew from our partnership with Volstad Maritime AS
which related to the construction of the Deep Cygnus
vessel. We are no longer obligated to fulfill our financial
commitment. The change reduced our vessel construction
obligations due in less than one year by $41.6 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
2-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Debt
obligations(1)(2)(3)
|
|
$
|
752,155
|
|
|
$
|
187,533
|
|
|
$
|
106,593
|
|
|
$
|
284,398
|
|
|
$
|
173,631
|
|
Interest on fixed rate
debt(4)
|
|
|
127,498
|
|
|
|
21,341
|
|
|
|
35,675
|
|
|
|
14,044
|
|
|
|
56,438
|
|
Interest on variable rate
debt(5)
|
|
|
52,324
|
|
|
|
14,557
|
|
|
|
19,290
|
|
|
|
11,943
|
|
|
|
6,534
|
|
Vessel construction
obligations(6)
|
|
|
133,194
|
|
|
|
49,224
|
|
|
|
83,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time charter and equipment leases
|
|
|
372,789
|
|
|
|
136,794
|
|
|
|
147,784
|
|
|
|
59,226
|
|
|
|
28,985
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
10,879
|
|
|
|
3,856
|
|
|
|
3,612
|
|
|
|
2,275
|
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
Taxes
payable(7)
|
|
|
35,307
|
|
|
|
2,289
|
|
|
|
8,254
|
|
|
|
8,254
|
|
|
|
16,510
|
|
Pension obligations
|
|
|
6,048
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
3,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,490,194
|
|
|
$
|
416,124
|
|
|
$
|
406,314
|
|
|
$
|
381,314
|
|
|
$
|
286,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes fresh-start debt premium
of $0.3 million and unamortized discount on
3.0% Debentures and 8.125% Debentures of
$33.0 million and $14.6 million, respectively, at
June 30, 2009.
|
82
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Does not assume any early
conversions or redemption of the 8.125% Debentures and
3% Debentures as each is assumed to reach its originally
stated maturity date. Holders of our 3% Debentures have the
right to require us to repurchase the debentures on each of
January 15, 2014, January 15, 2017 and
January 15, 2022. Please see Risks and
Uncertainties.
|
|
(3) |
|
The maturities of certain debt
agreements with SR Bank have been amended with approximately
$101.7 million due on January 1, 2010.
Managements intent is to pay the outstanding balances by
January 1, 2010.
|
|
(4) |
|
Primarily includes the semi-annual
interest payments on the 8.125% Debentures and the
3% Debentures to their maturities of 2013 and 2027,
respectively and interest payments on the 6.11% Notes
maturing 2014.
|
|
(5) |
|
For the purpose of this
calculation, amounts assume interest rates on floating rate
obligations remain unchanged from levels at June 30, 2009,
throughout the life of the obligation.
|
|
(6) |
|
Reflects committed expenditures, of
which approximately $45.3 million will be covered through
increases of the available capacity under our existing credit
facilities when the vessels are delivered ($27.2 million
and $18.1 million of this amount relates to expenditures in
the annual periods ending June 30, 2010 and 2012,
respectively), and does not reflect the future capital
expenditures budgeted for periods presented which are
discretionary. In the second quarter of 2009, we also canceled
the Deep Cygnus, a large newbuild vessel, thereby
terminating our obligation to fund $41.6 million in capital
expenditures, and completed negotiations with Tebma to suspend
construction of the remaining four newbuild MPSVs (the Trico
Surge, Trico Sovereign, Trico Seeker and
Trico Searcher). Trico holds the option to cancel
construction of the four new build MPSVs after July 15,
2010, which would reduce our committed future capital
expenditures to approximately $40 million on the three
MPSVs we expect to be delivered by the third quarter of 2010.
Since the beginning of 2009, we have sold legacy towing and
supply vessels worth $30 million and have executed
agreements for the sale of additional vessels for approximately
$40 million.
|
|
(7) |
|
Norwegian tax laws allow for a
portion of the accumulated untaxed shipping profits,
$35.3 million, prior to June 30, 2009 to be paid in
equal installments over the next 9 years. An additional
liability of $18.6 million could be satisfied through
making qualifying environmental expenditures. As a result of
changes in Norwegian tax laws during the first quarter of 2009.
We recognized a one-time tax benefit in first quarter earnings
of $18.6 million. We also have liabilities for uncertain
tax positions of $2.3 million at June 30, 2009 that
have not been included in the table above due to the uncertain
timing of settlement.
|
Cash
Flows
The following table sets forth the cash flows for the periods
presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by operations
|
|
$
|
79,938
|
|
|
$
|
112,476
|
|
|
$
|
28,675
|
|
|
$
|
44,732
|
|
Cash flow used in investing
|
|
|
(592,877
|
)
|
|
|
(235,269
|
)
|
|
|
(18,609
|
)
|
|
|
(473,158
|
)
|
Cash flow (used in) provided by financing
|
|
|
502,596
|
|
|
|
130,361
|
|
|
|
(74,373
|
)
|
|
|
457,266
|
|
Effects of foreign exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(26,507
|
)
|
|
|
9,722
|
|
|
|
4,763
|
|
|
|
6,437
|
|
Our primary source of cash flow during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 was due to cash from operations with focused
working capital management. The primary uses of cash were for
payments of the make-whole provision with the conversions of the
6.5% Debentures, payments for the purchases of new build
vessels and ROVs and maintenance of other property and
equipment, and repayments on our existing credit facilities.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, our cash balance
decreased $59.5 million to $35.1 million from
$94.6 million at December 31, 2008.
Net Cash from
Operating Activities.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 was $28.7 million, a decrease of
$16.1 million from the same period in 2008. Significant
components of cash used in operating activities during the six
months ended June 30, 2009 included cash paid for the
make-whole premium related to the conversions of the
6.5% Debentures of $6.9 million, non-cash items of
$7.6 million and changes in working capital and other asset
and liability balances resulting in cash provided by operations
of $23.3 million. We expect to fund our future routine
operating needs through operating cash flows and draws on our
various credit facilities.
83
Net cash from operating activities was $79.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to
$112.5 million in 2007. The decrease in operating cash
flows was primarily the result of the decreases in operating
income discussed above, increased expenditures related to the
acquisition of DeepOcean, and overall working capital
requirements related to expanding and establishing our
operations in various regions. Significant components of cash
provided by operating activities during the year ended
December 31, 2008 include net losses of $106.9 million
plus non-cash items of $167.8 million, and a decrease in
working capital balances of $19.0 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities for any period will
fluctuate according to the level of business activity for the
applicable period. Net cash from operating activities for the
year 2007 was $112.5 million. Significant components of
cash provided by operating activities during the year 2007
include net earnings of $57.7 million plus non-cash items
of $27.0 million and a decrease in working capital balances
of $27.8 million.
Net Cash from Investing Activities.
Net cash used in investing activities was $18.6 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to
$473.2 million for the same period in 2008. Our investing
cash flow in 2009 primarily reflects $48.8 million of
additions to property and equipment partially offset by
$30.0 million of proceeds from asset sales of six vessels
in 2009. We anticipate that during the remainder of 2009 we will
spend approximately $37 million for additional capital
expenditures, of which $24 million is committed. Our
investing cash flow in the six months ended June 30, 2008
primarily reflects our investment in the acquisition of
DeepOcean, net of cash acquired of $430.8 million and
$62.2 million of additions to property and equipment. Our
investing cash flows also include $7.0 million of proceeds
from the asset sales, proceeds of $8.2 million associated
with a settlement of a derivative contract held by DeepOcean
(entered into prior to our acquisition) and a $4.6 million
decrease in restricted cash related to the transfer of the
remaining four vessels associated with the second closing of
EMSL in January 2008.
Net cash used in investing activities was $592.8 million in
the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to
$235.3 million in 2007. Cash utilized in the year ended
December 31, 2008 was primarily the result of the DeepOcean
acquisition and costs related to the construction of eight MPSV
vessels and one subsea trenching and protection vessel. As
further discussed in Note 4 to our consolidated financial
statements, we utilized $506.1 million of cash, net of cash
acquired, in connection with the acquisition of DeepOcean. To
fund the transaction we used available cash, borrowings under
new, existing and amended revolving lines of credit, proceeds
from the issuance of $300.0 million of
6.5% Debentures, and the issuance of phantom stock units.
Vessel construction costs were $107.5 million in the year
ended December 31, 2008, an increase of $81.4 million
over 2007.
We used $235.3 million in investing activities in the year
ended December 31, 2007, $220.4 million of which is
attributed to the Active Subsea acquisition (net of cash of
$27.2 million) and $26.1 million for additions to
properties and equipment, partially offset by approximately
$4.6 million of proceeds from the sales of assets and a
$4.1 million decrease of cash restrictions. Our investing
cash flows include purchases of $184.8 million and sales of
$187.3 million of securities during the year. During the
year ended December 31, 2007 three supply vessels and one
Crew/Line Handler were sold for $4.5 million in net
proceeds with a corresponding aggregate gain of
$2.8 million. During the year ended December 31, 2006
we sold three active crew boats for total proceeds of
$1.8 million and an aggregate gain of $1.3 million, in
connection with a purchase option exercised by customers under
respective charter agreements.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities.
Net cash used in financing activities was $74.4 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to cash
provided of $457.3 million for the same period in 2008. Our
2009 amount includes a dividend payment of $6.1 million to
EMSLs non-controlling partner, net repayments of debt of
approximately $62.0 million, which includes
$12.7 million related to the convertible debt exchange, and
84
$6.2 million of refinancing costs related to the exchange.
The 2008 amount includes $461.8 million in financing
transactions primarily associated with the acquisition of
DeepOcean, including the issuance of $300.0 million of
6.5% Debentures and $161.8 million of net borrowings
under our existing credit facilities. Our financing activities
during the first half of 2008 also included $11.6 million
of net proceeds received from the exercise of warrants and
options and debt issuance costs associated with the
6.5% Debentures and our bank credit facilities totaled
$16.1 million in the first half of 2008.
Net cash provided by financing activities was
$502.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2008,
which is primarily the result of proceeds from the issuance of
$300.0 million of 6.5% Debentures, and
$203.8 million of net borrowings, primarily related to debt
incurred in connection with the DeepOcean acquisition. Net
proceeds of the offering and additional borrowings were used in
connection with the acquisition of DeepOcean, and financing of
vessel construction.
In the year ended December 31, 2007, financing activities
provided $130.4 million of cash, which is primarily the
result of proceeds from the issuance of $150.0 million
3% senior convertible debentures, offset by
$17.6 million used to repurchase common stock. In February
2007, we issued $150.0 million of 3% senior
convertible debentures due in 2027. We received net proceeds of
approximately $145.2 million after deducting commissions
and offering costs of approximately $4.8 million, which
were capitalized as debt issuance costs and are being amortized
over the life of the 3% Debentures. Net proceeds of the
offering were for general corporate purposes, the acquisition of
Active Subsea, and financing of our fleet renewal program.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We consider certain accounting policies to be critical policies
due to the significant judgment, estimation processes and
uncertainty involved for each in the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements. We believe the following
represent our critical accounting policies.
Revenue Recognition. We earn and recognize
revenues primarily from the time and bareboat chartering of
vessels to customers based upon daily rates of hire, and by
providing other subsea services. A time charter is a lease
arrangement under which we provide a vessel to a customer and
are responsible for all crewing, insurance and other operating
expenses. In a bareboat charter, we provide only the vessel to
the customer, and the customer assumes responsibility to provide
for all of the vessels operating expenses and generally
assumes all risk of operation. Vessel charters may range from
several days to several years. Other vessel income is generally
related to billings for fuel, bunks, meals and other services
provided to our customers.
Other subsea service revenue, primarily derived from the hiring
of equipment and operators to provide subsea services to our
customers, consists primarily of revenue from billings that
provide for a specific time for operators, material, and
equipment charges, which accrue daily and are billed
periodically for the delivery of subsea services over a
contractual term. Service revenue is generally recognized when a
signed contract or other persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, the service has been provided, the fee is fixed or
determinable, and collection of resulting receivables is
reasonably assured.
In addition, revenue for certain subsea contracts related to
trenching of subsea pipelines, flowlines and cables, and
installation of subsea cables (umbilicals, ISUs, power and
telecommunications) and flexible flowlines is recognized based
on the
percentage-of-completion
method in accordance with the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants Statement of Position
81-1,
Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and
Certain Production-Type Contracts, measured by the
percentage of costs incurred to date to estimated total costs
for each contract. Cost estimates are reviewed monthly as the
work progresses, and adjustments proportionate to the percentage
of completion are reflected in revenue for the period when such
estimates are revised. Claims for extra work or changes in scope
of work are included in revenue when the amount can be reliably
estimated and collection is probable. Losses expected to be
incurred on contracts in progress are charged to operations in
the period such losses are determined.
85
Goodwill and Intangible Assets. Our goodwill
represents the purchase price in excess of the net amounts
assigned to assets acquired and liabilities we assumed in
connection with the May 2008 acquisition of DeepOcean (see
Note 4 for further discussion). Our reporting units follow
our operating segments under SFAS 131 and goodwill has been
recorded related to the acquisition in two reporting
units (1) subsea services and (2) subsea
trenching and protection.
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at
the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual
tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more
likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit
below its carrying value. The goodwill impairment test is a
two-step test. Under the first step, the fair value of the
reporting unit is compared with its carrying value (including
goodwill). If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than
its carrying value, an indication of goodwill impairment exists
for the reporting unit and the enterprise must perform step two
of the impairment test (measurement). Under step two, an
impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying
amount of the reporting units goodwill over the implied
fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill
is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit
in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Statement No. 141, Business
Combinations. The residual fair value after this
allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit
goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its
carrying value, step two does not need to be performed.
At December 31, 2008, the measurement date, we performed
the first step of the two-step impairment test proscribed by
SFAS No. 142, and compared the fair value of the
reporting units to its carrying value. In assessing the fair
value of the reporting unit, we used a market approach that
incorporated the Company Specific Stock Price method and the
Guideline Public Company method, each receiving a 50% weighting.
Due to current market conditions, we concluded that the market
approach would be most appropriate in arriving at the fair value
of the reporting units. Key assumptions included our publicly
traded stock price, using a
30-day
average price of $3.98 per share, an implied control premium of
9%, and a fair value of debt based primarily on the price for
our publicly traded debentures. In step one of the impairment
test, the fair value of both the Subsea Services and Subsea
Trenching and Protection reporting units were less than the
carrying value of the net assets of the respective reporting
units, and thus we performed step two of the impairment test.
In step two of the impairment test, we determined the implied
fair value of goodwill and compared it to the carrying value of
the goodwill for each reporting unit. We allocated the fair
value of the reporting units to all of the assets and
liabilities of the respective units as if the reporting unit had
been acquired in a business combination. Our step two analysis
resulted in no implied fair value of goodwill for either
reporting unit, and therefore, we recognized an impairment
charge of $169.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2008,
representing a write-off of the entire amount of our previously
recorded goodwill. This impairment is based on a combination of
factors including the current global economic environment,
higher costs of equity and debt capital and the decline in our
market capitalization and that of comparable subsea services
companies. SFAS No. 142 requires that intangible
assets with estimable useful lives be amortized over their
respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual
values, and reviewed for impairments in accordance with
SFAS No. 144. The intangible assets subject to
amortization are amortized using the straight-line method over
estimated useful lives of 11 to 13 years for the customer
relationships.
Accounting for Long-Lived Assets. We had
approximately $804.4 million in net property and equipment
(excluding assets held for sale) at December 31, 2008,
which comprised approximately 66.9% of our total assets. In
addition to the original cost of these assets, their recorded
value is impacted by a number of policy elections, including the
estimation of useful lives and residual values.
Depreciation for equipment commences once it is placed in
service and depreciation for buildings and leasehold
improvements commences once they are ready for their intended
use. Depreciable lives and salvage values are determined through
economic analysis, reviewing existing fleet
86
plans, and comparison to competitors that operate similar
fleets. Depreciation for financial statement purposes is
provided on the straight-line method. Residual values are
estimated based on our historical experience with regards to the
sale of both vessels and spare parts, and are established in
conjunction with the estimated useful lives of the vessel.
Marine vessels are depreciated over useful lives ranging from 15
to 35 years from the date of original acquisition,
estimated based on historical experience for the particular
vessel type. Major modifications, which extend the useful life
of marine vessels, are capitalized and amortized over the
adjusted remaining useful life of the vessel.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. We record
impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when
events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be
impaired as defined by SFAS No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted
future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If
such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be
recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying
amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the
carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. If market
conditions were to decline in market areas in which we operate,
it could require us to evaluate the recoverability of our
long-lived assets, which may result in write-offs or write-downs
on our vessels that may be material individually or in the
aggregate.
In connection with completing step two of our goodwill
impairment analysis in the fourth quarter 2008, as further
discussed in Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets above,
we also assessed the current fair values of its other
significant assets including marine vessels and other marine
equipment, concluding that no impairment existed at
December 31, 2008. We recognized a $0.1 million
impairment of a supply vessel for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and a $2.6 million impairment of a
Crew/Line Handler in 2006.
Unrealized Gain on Mark to Market of Embedded
Derivative. SFAS No. 133 requires
valuations for our embedded derivatives within our previous
6.5% Debentures and our new 8.125% Debentures. The
estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives will fluctuate
based upon various factors that include our common stock closing
price, volatility, United States Treasury bond rates and the
time value of options. The fair value for the
8.125% Debentures will also fluctuate due to the passage of
time. The calculation of the fair value of the derivatives
requires the use of a Monte Carlo simulation lattice
option-pricing model. The fair value of the embedded derivative
associated with our new 8.125% Debentures on the date of
the exchange was $4.7 million. On June 30, 2009, the
estimated fair value of the 8.125% Debenture derivative was
$3.7 million resulting in a $1.0 million unrealized
gain for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The embedded
derivative on our previous 6.5% Debentures was revalued on
the date of the exchange and the unrealized gain (loss) for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 was $0.4 million. The
change in our stock price, coupled with the passage of time, are
the primary factors influencing the change in value of these
derivatives and the impact on our net income (loss) attributable
to Trico Marine Services, Inc. Any increase in our stock price
will result in unrealized losses being recognized in future
periods and such amounts could be material.
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance. We recognize
deferred income tax liabilities and assets for the expected
future tax consequences of events that have been included in the
consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Under this
method, deferred income tax liabilities and assets are
determined based on the difference between the financial
statement and tax bases of liabilities and assets using enacted
tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are
expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce
deferred tax assets to an amount management determines is more
likely than not to be realized in future years.
In connection with our 2005 emergence from bankruptcy, we
adopted fresh start accounting as of March 15, 2005. A
valuation allowance was established at that time associated with
the U.S. net deferred tax asset because it was not likely
that this benefit would be realized. Because we have not yet
seen sustained long-term positive results from our
U.S. operations, we have continued to maintain
87
this valuation allowance against all U.S. net deferred tax
assets. Although we recorded a profit from operations in recent
years from our U.S. operations, the history of negative
earnings from these operations and the emphasis to expand our
presence in growing international markets constitute significant
negative evidence substantiating the need for a full valuation
allowance against the U.S. net deferred tax assets as of
December 31, 2008.
Fresh-start accounting rules require that release of the
valuation allowance recorded against pre-confirmation net
deferred tax assets is reflected as an increase to additional
paid-in capital. We will use cumulative profitability and future
income projections as key indicators to substantiate the release
of the valuation allowance. This will result in an increase in
additional paid in capital at the time the valuation allowance
is reduced. If our U.S. operations continue to be
profitable, it is possible we will release the valuation
allowance at some future date.
As of December 31, 2008, we have remaining net operating
losses in certain of our Norwegian and Brazilian entities
totaling $152.9 million, resulting in a deferred tax asset
of $43.4 million. A valuation allowance of
$23.4 million was provided against the financial losses
generated in one of our Norwegian tonnage entities as the loss
can only be utilized against future financial taxable profit and
it is not possible to use group relief to offset taxable profits
and losses for group companies subject to tonnage taxation. The
remaining losses have an indefinite carry forward and will not
expire.
Uncertain Tax Positions. FASB Interpretation
No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109, clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial
statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. The interpretation
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and
also provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. We adopted the provisions of
FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. We recognize interest and
penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income
tax expense.
Recent Accounting
Standards
On May 9, 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement) (the FSP or ABP
14-1).
The FASB also decided to add further disclosures for instruments
subject to this guidance. The new rules changed the accounting
for convertible debt instruments that permitted cash settlement
upon conversion and were applied to our 3% Debentures.
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of
this FSP and applied them, on a retrospective basis, to our
consolidated financial statements, including those presented
herein. The impact of the FSP is reflected in Notes 3, 5,
8, 10, 11, 13, 18, and 19 to our consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2007 and 2008 and for each of
the three years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008. The
FSP required us to separately account for the liability and
equity components of our senior convertible notes in a manner
intended to reflect its nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. We
determined the carrying amount of the senior convertible note
liability by measuring the fair value as of the issuance date of
a similar note without a conversion feature. The difference
between the proceeds from the sale of the senior convertible
notes and the amount reflected as the senior convertible note
liability was recorded as additional paid-in capital.
Effectively, the convertible debt was recorded at a discount to
reflect its below market coupon interest rate. The excess of the
principal amount of the senior convertible notes over their
initial fair value (the discount) is accreted to
interest expense over the expected life of the senior
convertible notes. Interest expense is recorded for the coupon
interest payments on the senior convertible notes as well as the
accretion of the discount. The adoption did not have an impact
on our cash flows.
We adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, on January 1, 2008.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles and expands disclosure
88
about fair value measurements. The net effect of the
implementation of SFAS No. 157 on our financial
statements was immaterial.
On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, deferring
the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at least
annually. The net effect of the implementation of this FSP on
our financial statements was immaterial.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141(R)), which replaces
SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations.
SFAS No. 141(R) retains the underlying concepts of
SFAS No. 141 in that all business combinations are
still required to be accounted for at fair value under the
acquisition method of accounting, but SFAS No. 141(R)
changes the method of applying the acquisition method in a
number of significant aspects. In addition to expanding the
types of transactions that will now qualify as business
combinations, SFAS 141(R) also provides that acquisition
costs will generally be expensed as incurred; noncontrolling
interests will be valued at fair value at the acquisition date;
restructuring costs associated with a business combination will
generally be expensed subsequent to the acquisition date; and
changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income
tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally will
affect income tax expense. SFAS No. 141(R) is
effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of
the first annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008,
with an exception related to the accounting for valuation
allowances on deferred taxes and acquired contingencies related
to acquisitions completed before the effective date.
SFAS No. 141(R) amends SFAS No. 109 to
require adjustments, made after the effective date of this
statement, to valuation allowances for acquired deferred tax
assets and income tax positions to be recognized as income tax
expense. SFAS No. 141(R) is required to be adopted
concurrently with SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of
ARB No. 51, and is effective for business combination
transactions for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(FAS 160). FAS 160 states that
accounting and reporting for noncontrolling interests
(previously referred to as minority interests) will be
recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a
component of equity. FAS 160 applies to all entities that
prepare consolidated financial statements, except
not-for-profit
organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an
outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries
or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. This statement is effective
as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year
beginning after December 15, 2008. The provisions of the
standard were applied to all noncontrolling interests
prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure
requirements, which were applied retrospectively to all periods
presented and have been disclosed as such in our consolidated
financial statements contained herein.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. This statement is effective for financial
statements issued for periods beginning after December 15,
2008. This statement conforms certain assumption requirements
between SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Intangibles with SFAS No. 141(R), Business
Combinations with respect to estimating the useful life of
an intangible asset. In addition, the Statement requires certain
additional disclosures about intangible assets. The net effect
of implementing this FSP on our financial statements was
immaterial.
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our market risk exposures primarily include interest rate and
exchange rate fluctuations on financial instruments as detailed
below. The following sections address the significant market
risks associated with our financial activities. Our exposure to
market risk as discussed below includes
89
forward-looking statements and represents estimates
of possible changes in fair values, future earnings or cash
flows that would occur assuming hypothetical future movements in
foreign currency exchange rates or interest rates. Our views on
market risk are not necessarily indicative of actual results
that may occur and do not represent the maximum possible gains
and losses that may occur, since actual gains and losses will
differ from those estimated, based upon actual fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and the timing
of transactions.
Interest Rate
Risk
The table below provides information about our market-sensitive
debt instruments. Our fixed-rate debt has no earnings exposure
from changes in interest rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Fair Value at
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
Debt(1)
|
|
$
|
1,258
|
|
|
$
|
1,258
|
|
|
$
|
1,258
|
|
|
$
|
1,258
|
|
|
$
|
1,258
|
|
|
$
|
428,625
|
|
|
$
|
147,078
|
|
Variable rate
debt(2)
|
|
|
81,724
|
|
|
|
83,761
|
|
|
|
78,331
|
|
|
|
47,723
|
|
|
|
59,183
|
|
|
|
64,983
|
|
|
|
415,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
82,982
|
|
|
$
|
85,019
|
|
|
$
|
79,589
|
|
|
$
|
48,981
|
|
|
$
|
60,441
|
|
|
$
|
493,608
|
|
|
$
|
562,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes (i) the
3% Debentures, bearing interest at 3.00%, interest payable
semi-annually and maturing in 2027, (ii) the
6.5% Debentures bearing interest at 6.5%, interest payable
semi-annually, maturing 2028 and (iii) the
6.11% Notes, bearing interest at 6.11%, principal and
interest due in 30 semi-annual installments, maturing in 2014.
Does not include the amount we would be required to pay if the
remaining holders of our 6.5% Debentures convert, we would
be required to pay approximately $75 million (as of
March 11, 2009) in cash related to the interest
make-whole provision.
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes various credit facilities
and term debt as further described in Note 5 to our annual
consolidated financial statements included in this offering
memorandum.
|
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Our consolidated reporting currency is the U.S. Dollar
although we have substantial operations located outside the
United States. We are primarily exposed to fluctuations in the
foreign currency exchange rates of the Norwegian Kroner, the
British Pound, the Brazilian Real and the Nigerian Naira. A
number of our subsidiaries use a different functional currency
than the U.S. Dollar. The functional currencies of these
subsidiaries include the Norwegian Kroner, the Euro the
Brazilian Real, and the Nigerian Naira. As a result, the
reported amount of our assets and liabilities related to our
non-U.S. operations
and, therefore, our consolidated financial statements will
fluctuate based upon changes in currency exchange rates.
We manage foreign currency risk by attempting to contract as
much foreign revenue as possible in U.S. Dollars. To the
extent that our foreign subsidiaries revenues are denominated in
U.S. Dollars, changes in foreign currency exchange rates
impact our earnings. This is somewhat mitigated by the amount of
foreign subsidiary expenses that are also denominated in
U.S. Dollars. In order to further mitigate this risk, we
may utilize foreign currency forward contracts to better match
the currency of our revenues and associated costs. We do not use
foreign currency forward contracts for trading or speculative
purposes. The counterparties to these contracts would be limited
to major financial institutions, which would minimize
counterparty credit risk. There were no foreign exchange forward
contracts outstanding during 2008 and there were none
outstanding as of June 30, 2009.
Embedded
Derivative Risk
As discussed in Note 5 and Note 6 to our annual
audited consolidated financial statements included in this
offering memorandum, the conversion feature contained in our
6.5% Debentures is required to be accounted for separately
and recorded as a derivative financial instrument measured at
fair
90
value. The estimate of fair value was determined through the use
of a Monte Carlo simulation lattice option-pricing model that
included various assumptions, including our December 31,
2008 stock closing price of $4.47 per share, expected volatility
of 50%, a discount rate of 10.95% using United States Treasury
Bond Rates of 1.39% and risk adjusted rates of 7.97% for the
time value of options. At December 31, 2008, we estimate
that a 10% and 30% increase in the price of our stock (keeping
other assumptions constant) would increase the fair value of the
conversion feature by approximately $0.3 million and
$0.8 million, respectively. The reduction in our stock
price in the primary factor influencing the change in value of
this derivative and its impact on our net income. Any increase
in our stock price will result in unrealized losses being
recognized in future periods and such amounts could be material.
As discussed in Note 8 and Note 9 to our interim unaudited
consolidated financial statements at June 30, 2009, the
conversion feature contained in our 8.125% is also recorded as a
derivative financial instrument measured at fair value. The
8.125% Debentures were exchanged for the 6.5% Debentures in May
2009. The estimate of fair value was determined through the use
of a Monte Carlo simulation lattice option-pricing model. The
assumptions used in the valuation model for the 8.125%
Debentures as of June 30, 2009 include the Companys stock
closing price of $3.41, expected volatility of 60%, a discount
rate of 25.0% and a United States Treasury Bond Rate of 1.90%
for the time value of options.
91
The Trico Supply Group
As used in the managements discussion and analysis of
financial condition and results of operations for the Trico
Supply Group below, Trico Supply Group,
we, us, and our refers to
the Trico Supply Group.
Overview
The Trico Supply Group is an integrated provider of subsea
services, subsea trenching and protection services and OSVs to
oil and natural gas exploration and production companies that
operate in major offshore producing regions around the world.
The Parent acquired Active Subsea in 2007 and DeepOcean and CTC
Marine in 2008. The remainder of our revenue is attributable to
our legacy towing and supply business. We operate through three
business segments: (1) subsea services, (2) subsea
trenching and protection and (3) towing and supply.
Our
Outlook
The results of operations for the Trico Supply Group are highly
dependent on the level of operating and capital spending for
exploration and development by the energy industry, among other
things. The energy industrys level of operating and
capital spending is substantially related to the demand for
natural resources, the prevailing commodity price of natural gas
and crude oil, and expectations for such prices. During periods
of low commodity prices, our customers may reduce their capital
spending budgets which could result in reduced demand for our
services. Other factors that influence the level of capital
spending by our customers which are beyond our control include:
worldwide demand for crude oil and natural gas and the cost of
exploring for and producing oil and natural gas, which can be
affected by environmental regulations, significant weather
conditions, maintenance requirements and technological advances
that affect energy and its usage.
For the remainder of 2009, the Trico Supply Group will continue
to focus on the following key areas:
Carefully manage liquidity and cash flow. Our
substantial amount of indebtedness requires us to manage our
cash flow to maintain compliance under our debt covenants and to
meet our capital expenditure and debt service requirements. The
Trico Supply Group has a disciplined approach to marketing and
contracting our vessels and equipment to achieve less spot
market exposure in favor of long-term contracts. The expansion
of our subsea services activities is intended to have a
stabilizing influence on our cash flow.
Maximize our vessel utilization and our service
spreads. We continue to increase our combined
subsea services and subsea trenching and protection fleet
primarily through chartering of third-party vessels. We offer
our customers a variety of subsea installation, construction,
trenching and protection services using combinations of our
equipment and personnel to maximize the earnings per vessel and
to increase the opportunity to offer a differentiated technology
service package.
Expand our presence in additional subsea services
markets. In contrast to the overall market served
by our traditional towing and supply business, we believe the
subsea market is growing and will provide a higher rate of
return on our services. We have increased our marketing efforts
to expand our subsea services business in West Africa, Southeast
Asia / China, Brazil, the United States and Mexico.
For the second quarter of 2009, our aggregate revenues in these
markets represented 31% of Trico Supply Groups revenue in
subsea operations. Through our legacy towing and supply
business, we have strong relationships with important customers,
such as a contractor of Pemex, Statoil and CNOOC, and an
in-depth understanding of their bidding procedures, technical
requirements and needs. We are leveraging this infrastructure to
expand our subsea services and trenching and protection
businesses around the world.
Invest in growth of our subsea fleet. We
continually aim to improve our fleets capabilities in the
subsea services area by focusing on more sophisticated next
generation subsea vessels that will be
92
attractive to a broad range of customers and can be deployed
worldwide. We are building three new MPSVs (the Trico
Star, Trico Service and Trico Sea), which are
expected to be delivered in the first, second and third quarters
of 2010, respectively. Our remaining committed capital
expenditures related to these vessels is approximately
$40 million. We also lease many of the vessels used in our
subsea services and subsea trenching and protection businesses.
This gives us the opportunity to expand our business without
large incremental capital expenditures, to match vessel
capabilities with project requirements, and to benefit from
periods of oversupply of vessels. We believe having an
up-to-date and technologically advanced fleet is critical to our
being competitive within the subsea services and subsea
trenching and protection businesses. Finally, we invest in ROVs
and subsea trenching and protection equipment. We have recently
completed the construction of the RT-1 and the UT-1 further
enhancing our capabilities. We view our future expenditures for
such assets as discretionary in nature, and we will only
undertake them to the extent we believe they are economically
justified.
Reduce exposure to a declining offshore towing and supply
vessel business. Over time, we believe
transitioning away from a low growth, commoditized towing and
supply business toward specialized subsea services will result
in improved operating results. In 2009, Trico Supply Group sold
a PSV for aggregate proceeds of approximately $26 million.
We have also executed agreements for the sale of two North Sea
class vessels for approximately $40 million. We will
continue to look for opportunities to divest non-core or
underperforming towing and supply assets. We will also continue
to position our towing and supply vessels in markets where we
believe we have a competitive advantage or that have positive
fundamentals.
Market
Outlook Demand for Our Vessels and
Services
Each of our operating segments experiences different impacts
from the current overall economic slowdown, crisis in the credit
markets, and decline in oil prices. In all segments, however, we
have seen increased exploration and production spending in
Brazil, Mexico and China and will continue to focus our efforts
on increasing our market presence in those regions in the last
three months of 2009. For the remainder of 2009, we expect, in
general, further declines in exploration and production
spending, offshore drilling worldwide, and construction
spending, but we anticipate overall subsea spending to increase
based on unit growth in new subsea installation and a large base
of installed units.
Subsea Services. Although projects may be
postponed as a result of low commodity prices, we have not had
any subsea contracts canceled in 2009; however, some of our
projects have been delayed until the second half of 2009 and
into 2010. Given that a majority of our subsea services work
includes inspection, maintenance and repair required to maintain
existing pipelines, and such services are covered by operating
expenditures rather than capital expenditures, we believe that
the outlook for our subsea services will remain consistent with
the levels of subsea spending occurring in 2008. We have seen no
material decline in pricing for subsea services when compared to
contracts awarded in 2008.
Subsea Protection and Trenching. For the
remainder of 2009, we expect demand for our subsea protection
and trenching services to be similarly driven by the increase in
overall spending on subsea services. However, we believe that
certain markets may be softer due to seasonality in this area
and therefore are mitigating such seasonality by mobilizing our
assets to regions less susceptible to seasonality. We generally
expect a weak market in the North Sea but we believe there is an
opportunity to develop a meaningful presence in emerging growth
areas for this segment including Southeast Asia / China,
Australia, the Mediterranean and Brazil.
Towing and Supply. In 2009, we are continuing
to see significant weakness in the towing and supply segment in
the North Sea, driven by reduced exploration and production
spending as a result of low commodity prices in addition to
seasonality for our AHTS vessels in this market. We have
proactively addressed the change in the fundamentals in this
market by selling a vessel, entering into a contract for the
sale of two vessels and classified another one as held for
sale. This has reduced our spot market exposure and increased
the percentage of our fleet operating under term contracts.
93
Market
Outlook Credit Environment
Through the latter half of 2008 we saw, and during the first
nine months of 2009 we have continued to see, lenders take steps
to initiate procedures to reduce their overall exposure to one
company (which will limit our ability to seek new financing from
existing lenders), increase margins and improve their collateral
position. Should we desire to further refinance existing debt or
access capital markets for new financing after this offering, we
expect terms and conditions of such refinancing or access to
capital markets to be challenging throughout the remainder of
2009.
Significant
Events
Acquisition of DeepOcean and CTC Marine. On
May 15, 2008, Parent initiated a series of events and
transactions that resulted in it acquiring 100% of DeepOcean and
its wholly-owned subsidiary CTC Marine. The acquisition price
for DeepOcean and CTC Marine was approximately
$700 million. To fund the transactions the Parent used
available cash, borrowings under new, existing and amended
revolving lines of credit, proceeds from the issuance of
$300 million of 6.5% Debentures and the issuance of
phantom stock units. DeepOceans and CTC Marines
results are included in our results of operations from the date
of acquisition, and significantly affected every component of
our 2008 operating income as compared with our prior year
results.
The following table provides the amounts included in our 2008
results from the operations of DeepOcean and CTC Marine for the
period from May 16, 2008 to December 31, 2008 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DeepOcean
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trico Supply
|
|
|
and CTC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Marine
|
|
|
Legacy Trico
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
445,219
|
|
|
$
|
308,649
|
|
|
$
|
136,570
|
|
Direct operating expenses
|
|
|
(332,161
|
)
|
|
|
(242,937
|
)
|
|
|
(89,224
|
)
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
(31,543
|
)
|
|
|
(21,182
|
)
|
|
|
(10,361
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(46,951
|
)
|
|
|
(34,203
|
)
|
|
|
(12,748
|
)
|
Impairments
|
|
|
(172,840
|
)
|
|
|
(172,840
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(138,345
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162,513
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volstad Impairment. In July 2007, DeepOcean AS
established a limited partnership under Norwegian law with
Volstad Maritime AS for the sole purpose of creating an entity
that would finance the construction of a new vessel. This entity
is fully consolidated by DeepOcean. According to the terms of
the partnership agreement, neither party to the partnership was
obligated to fund more than its committed capital contribution
with the remaining portion to be financed through third party
financings. Given the global economic turmoil and resulting
difficulties in obtaining financing, the purpose of the
partnership has been frustrated due to the fact that the
partnership has been unable to fulfill its commitment to obtain
financing for the remaining amount necessary to purchase the new
vessel. As a result, on April 27, 2009, DeepOcean AS served
notice to Volstad of its formal withdrawal from the partnership,
effective immediately, thereby eliminating its continuing
obligations therein. As a result, our total vessel construction
commitments were reduced by $41.6 million. On June 26,
2009, we reached an agreement with Volstad in which DeepOcean AS
withdrew from the partnership, CTC Marine was relieved of
obligations under the time charter with the partnership and we
were indemnified in full against claims of either Volstad or the
shipyard building the vessel. Our sole obligation is to pay NOK
7.0 million ($1.1 million) against an invoice for work
done to the vessel. Based on the outcome of those negotiations,
we recorded a $14.0 million asset impairment in the second
quarter of 2009, which is reflected in the Parents
consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2008 and
2009 and for the six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and
2009 on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows under
the line item Impairment. No remaining assets
associated with this partnership are on our books.
94
Factors that
Affect Our Results
We have three operating segments: subsea services, represented
primarily by the operations of DeepOcean and two subsea platform
supply vessels, or SPSVs, from our historic operations; subsea
trenching and protection, represented by the operations of CTC
Marine; and towing and supply, represented primarily by our
historical operation of marine supply vessels.
The revenues and costs for our subsea services segment primarily
are determined by the scope of individual projects and in
certain cases by multi-year contracts. Subsea services projects
may utilize any combination of vessels, both owned and leased,
and components of our non-fleet equipment consisting of ROVs,
installation handling equipment, and survey equipment. The scope
of work, complexity, and area of operation for our projects will
determine what assets will be deployed to service each
respective project. Rates for our subsea services typically
include a composite day rate for the utilization of a vessel
and/or the
appropriate equipment for the project, as well as the crew.
These day rates can be fixed or variable and are primarily
influenced by the specific technical requirements of the
project, the availability of the required vessels and equipment
and the projects geographic location and competition.
Occasionally, projects are based on unit-rate contracts (based
on units of work performed, such as miles of pipeline inspected
per day) and occasionally through lump-sum contractual
arrangements. In addition, we generate revenues for onshore
engineering work, post processing of survey data, and associated
reporting. The operating costs for the subsea services segment
primarily reflect the rental or ownership costs for our leased
vessels and equipment, crew compensation costs, supplies and
marine insurance. Our customers are typically responsible for
mobilization expenses and fuel costs. Variables that may affect
our subsea services segment include the scope and complexity of
each project, weather or environmental downtime, and water
depth. Delays or acceleration of projects will result in
fluctuations of when revenues are earned and costs are incurred
but generally they will not materially affect the total amount
of costs.
The revenues and costs for our subsea trenching and protection
segment are also primarily determined by the scope of individual
projects. Based on the overall scale of the respective projects,
we may utilize any combination of engineering services, assets
and personnel, consisting of a vessel that deploys a subsea
trenching asset, ROV and survey equipment, and supporting
offshore crew and management. Our asset and personnel deployment
is also dependent on various other factors such as subsea soil
conditions, the type and size of our customers product and
water depth. Revenues for our subsea trenching and protection
segment include a composite daily rate for the utilization of
vessels and assets plus fees for engineering services, project
management services and equipment mobilization. These daily
rates will vary in accordance with the complexity of the
project, existing framework agreements with clients, competition
and geographic location. The operating costs for this segment
predominately reflect the rental of its leased vessels, the
hiring of third party equipment (principally ROVs and survey
equipment which we sometimes hire from our subsea services
segment), engineering personnel, crew compensation and
depreciation on subsea assets. The delay or acceleration of the
commencement of customer offshore projects will result in
fluctuations in the timing of recognition of revenues and
related costs, but generally will not materially affect total
project revenues and costs.
The revenues for our towing and supply segment are impacted
primarily by fleet size and capabilities, day rates and vessel
utilization. Day rates and vessel utilization are primarily
driven by demand for our vessels, supply of new vessels, our
vessel availability, customer requirements, competition and
weather conditions. The operating costs for the towing and
supply segment are primarily a function of the active fleet
size. The most significant of our normal direct operating costs
include crew compensation, maintenance and repairs, marine
inspection costs, supplies and marine insurance. We are
typically responsible for normal operating expenses, while our
contracts provide that customers are typically responsible for
mobilization expenses and fuel costs.
Risks and
Uncertainties
We experienced lower than expected operating results in the
first half of 2009 as a result of seasonality early in 2009,
lower utilization due to planned vessel mobilizations for longer
term projects commencing mid-year in our subsea
95
services segments, deteriorating rates and utilization in our
towing and supply segment and the further weakening of the U.S.
dollar relative to the Norwegian kroner during the second
quarter of 2009 which also resulted in additional cash payments
required to bring the $200 million revolving credit facility
within its contractual credit limit.
As a result of these events, we believe that our forecasted cash
flows and current available credit capacity will not be
sufficient to meet our commitments as they come due over the
next twelve months and that we will not be able to remain in
compliance with our debt covenants unless we are able to
successfully refinance the $101.7 million outstanding under
the SR Bank debt and $19.9 million outstanding under the
23.3 million revolving credit facility each as of
June 30, 2009. We are pursuing the Refinancing Transactions
to refinance substantially all the debt of the Trico Supply
Group. If we fail to complete the Refinancing Transactions
successfully, we will continue our current dialogues with our
lenders to amend our existing facilities and our efforts to
reduce debt outstanding through asset sales.
If none of these approaches are successful in refinancing
certain debt, we would not be able to remain in compliance with
our debt covenants, and we will be in default under our credit
agreements, which in turn, would constitute an event of default
under all of our outstanding debt agreements. If this were to
occur, all of our outstanding debt would become callable by our
creditors and would be reclassified as a current liability on
our balance sheet. Our inability to repay the outstanding debt,
if it were to become current or if it were called by our
creditors, would have a material adverse effect on us and raises
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern. Our consolidated financial statements do not include
any adjustment related to the recoverability and classification
of recorded assets or the amounts and classification of
liabilities that might result from this uncertainty.
Our ability to generate or access cash is subject to events
beyond our control, such as declines in expenditures for
exploration, development and production activity, reduction in
global consumption of refined petroleum products, general
economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and
other factors. In light of the current financial turmoil, our
lenders may be unable or unwilling to provide necessary funding
in accordance with their commitments. Depending on the market
demand for our vessels and other growth opportunities that may
arise, we may require additional debt or equity financing. The
ability to raise additional indebtedness may be restricted by
the terms of the 8.125% Debentures and the notes being
offered hereby, which restrictions include a prohibition on
incurring certain types of indebtedness if our leverage exceeds
a certain level.
Results of
Operations
The following is a discussion of the results of operations for
each respective segment. Prior year amounts have been
reclassified to conform to our new segment presentation.
96
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2008
The following table summarizes our consolidated results of
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
$
|
120,692
|
|
|
$
|
44,156
|
|
|
$
|
76,536
|
|
|
|
173
|
%
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
94,403
|
|
|
|
15,463
|
|
|
|
78,940
|
|
|
|
511
|
%
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
38,814
|
|
|
|
54,934
|
|
|
|
(16,120
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
253,909
|
|
|
|
114,553
|
|
|
|
139,356
|
|
|
|
122
|
%
|
Operating Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
(16,458
|
)
|
|
|
8,969
|
|
|
|
(25,427
|
)
|
|
|
(283
|
)%
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
11,679
|
|
|
|
(2,502
|
)
|
|
|
14,181
|
|
|
|
(567
|
)%
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
14,664
|
|
|
|
11,925
|
|
|
|
2,739
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
9,885
|
|
|
|
18,392
|
|
|
|
(8,507
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)%
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
5,950
|
|
|
|
3,615
|
|
|
|
2,335
|
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
|
|
|
(18,313
|
)
|
|
|
(8,186
|
)
|
|
|
(10,127
|
)
|
|
|
124
|
%
|
Other (Expense) Income, Net
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
(1,140
|
)
|
|
|
2,085
|
|
|
|
(183
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes
|
|
|
(1,533
|
)
|
|
|
12,681
|
|
|
|
(14,214
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)%
|
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense
|
|
|
(17,992
|
)
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
(18,198
|
)
|
|
|
(8,834
|
)%
|
Less: Net (Income) Loss Attributable to the Noncontrolling
Interest
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to the Trico Supply Group
|
|
$
|
16,458
|
|
|
$
|
12,454
|
|
|
$
|
4,004
|
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97
The following information on day rates, utilization and average
number of vessels is relevant to our revenues and are the
primary drivers of our revenue fluctuations. Our consolidated
fleets average day rates, utilization, and average number
of vessels by vessel class, for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Average Day Rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPSVs(1)
|
|
$
|
44,015
|
|
|
$
|
29,247
|
|
MSVs(2)
|
|
|
74,440
|
|
|
|
74,508
|
(5)
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
$
|
113,347
|
|
|
$
|
179,115
|
(5)
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHTSs(3)
|
|
$
|
17,709
|
|
|
$
|
32,460
|
|
PSVs(4)
|
|
|
16,522
|
|
|
|
17,940
|
|
Utilization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPSVs
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
MSVs
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
79
|
%(5)
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
|
|
84
|
%(5)
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHTSs
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
PSVs
|
|
|
89
|
%
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
Average number of Vessels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPSVs
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
MSVs
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
(5)
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
(5)
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHTSs
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
PSVs
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Subsea platform supply vessels
|
|
(2) |
|
Multi-purpose service vessels
|
|
(3) |
|
Anchor handling, towing and supply
vessels
|
|
(4) |
|
Platform supply vessels
|
|
(5) |
|
Results from these vessel classes
reflect the period from May 2008 to June 2008.
|
Overall
Results
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we reported net
income attributable to the Trico Supply Group of
$16.5 million on revenues of $253.9 million compared
to net income attributable to Trico Supply Group of
$12.5 million on revenues of $114.6 million for the
same period in 2008. The 2009 results include an impairment
charge of $14.0 million related to our withdrawal from the
Volstad partnership, incremental results from the DeepOcean
acquisition in May 2008, two newbuild vessels that were
delivered in the second half of 2008 and a gain realized on the
sale of one vessel in the second quarter of 2009 partially
offset by decreases in our traditional towing and supply
operations due to weakness in the North Sea region as a
consequence of declines in the overall markets coupled with
newbuild vessels entering the North Sea market.
98
Segment
Results
Subsea Services. Revenues increased
$76.5 million for the six month period ended June 30,
2009 primarily due to the acquisition of DeepOcean in May 2008,
which contributed incremental revenues of $84.4 million.
The subsea service segment also includes revenues of
$10.3 million in the first six months of 2009 from SPSVs
that were previously part of our towing and supply segment,
representing a decrease of $1.2 million compared to the
same period in the prior year.
This segment reported operating losses of $16.5 million for
the six month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to
operating income of $9.0 million for the same prior year
period. This includes an impairment charge in the second quarter
of 2009 of $14.0 million related to our investment in a
partnership for the construction of a new vessel, the Deep
Cygnus. In the second quarter of 2009, we withdrew from the
partnership as it had been unable to fulfill its commitment to
obtain financing for the remaining amount necessary to purchase
the new vessel. For the six month period ended June 30,
2009 (excluding the impairment), operating results decreased
compared to the same period in the prior year as this segment
was adversely affected by the loss of 70 days of revenue in
the first quarter of 2009 due to mechanical issues on two subsea
vessels that are time chartered from a third-party vessel owner.
Additionally, one of our large subsea vessels, the Atlantic
Challenger, completed an extensive regulatory dry docking
after working for five years in Mexico, which negatively
affected our operating results in the first quarter of 2009.
Additionally, results are typically lower in the first quarter
of the year due to project delays related to harsh weather
conditions. In June, the average day rate for our DeepOcean
subsea services vessels was $86,000 and utilization was almost
90%, up 27% and 21%, respectively, over the first quarter of
2009.
Subsea Trenching and Protection. This segment
was established upon the acquisition of CTC Marine, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of DeepOcean, in May 2008, and therefore
the comparative prior year information is limited. This
segments day rates are a composite daily rate for the
utilization of vessels and assets plus fees for engineering
services, project management services and equipment mobilization
and will vary based on the project complexity, existing
framework agreements with clients, competition and geographic
location. For the six months ended June 30, 2009,
CTCs revenues were $94.4 million and its reported
income was $11.7 million. In the six months ended
June 30, 2009, this segments average vessel day rate
was $113,347.
Towing and Supply. Revenues decreased
$16.1 million for the six month period ended June 30,
2009 and operating income increased $2.7 million for the
six month period June 30, 2009 as compared to the same
prior year period. Operating income in the six month period
ended June 30, 2009 includes a gain on an asset sale of
$15.1 million related to the sale of a platform supply
vessel in the North Sea. Excluding the asset sale, the operating
income decreases were due to weakness in the North Sea region as
a consequence of declines in the overall markets coupled with
newbuild vessels entering the North Sea market.
Other
Items
Interest Income. Interest income for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 was $6.0 million, an
increase of $2.3 million compared to the same period in
2008, due to the intercompany notes between Trico Supply and
DeepOcean.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased
$10.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009,
compared to the same period in 2008. The increase is attributed
to the debt incurred and assumed when we acquired DeepOcean and
CTC Marine in May 2008 as well as intercompany notes between
Trico Supply and DeepOcean. We capitalize interest related to
vessels currently under construction. Capitalized interest for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled
$9.7 million, and $5.8 million for the same period in
2008.
99
Other (Expense) Income Net. Other (expense)
income net of $1.0 million for the six month period ended
June 30, 2009 increased $2.1 million from the same
period in 2008, primarily due to foreign exchange losses as the
U.S. Dollar slightly weakened against most European
currencies during 2009.
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense. Our income tax
(benefit) expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009
was $(18.0) million compared to $0.2 million for the
comparable prior year period. The income tax (benefit) expense
for each period is primarily associated with our foreign taxes.
Our tax benefit for the six month period ending June 30,
2009 differs from that under the statutory rate primarily due to
tax benefits associated with the Norwegian tonnage tax regime
and a change in law enacted on March 31, 2009, our
permanent reinvestment of foreign earnings and foreign taxes.
Our effective tax rate is subject to wide variations given its
structure and operations. We operate in many different taxing
jurisdictions with differing rates and tax structures.
Therefore, a change in our overall plan could have a significant
impact on the estimated rate. At June 30, 2008, our tax
expense differed from that under the statutory rate primarily
due to tax benefits associated with the Norwegian tonnage tax
regime, our permanent reinvestment of foreign earnings and
foreign taxes. Also impacting our tax expense was a reduction in
Norwegian taxes payable related to a dividend made between
related Norwegian entities during 2008.
Year Ended
December 31, 2008 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2007
The following table summarizes our Trico Supply Group results of
operations for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
$
|
205,245
|
|
|
$
|
18,059
|
|
|
$
|
187,186
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
%
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
123,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,804
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
116,170
|
|
|
|
124,780
|
|
|
|
(8,610
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
445,219
|
|
|
|
142,839
|
|
|
|
302,380
|
|
|
|
212
|
%
|
Operating Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
(115,817
|
)
|
|
|
6,424
|
|
|
|
(122,241
|
)
|
|
|
(1,903
|
)%
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
(35,264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,264
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
12,736
|
|
|
|
55,931
|
|
|
|
(43,195
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(138,345
|
)
|
|
|
62,355
|
|
|
|
(200,700
|
)
|
|
|
(322
|
)%
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
10,620
|
|
|
|
3,568
|
|
|
|
7,052
|
|
|
|
198
|
%
|
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
|
|
|
(32,776
|
)
|
|
|
(1,331
|
)
|
|
|
(31,445
|
)
|
|
|
2,363
|
%
|
Other Expense, Net
|
|
|
(2,361
|
)
|
|
|
(2,581
|
)
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes
|
|
|
(162,862
|
)
|
|
|
62,011
|
|
|
|
(224,873
|
)
|
|
|
(363
|
)%
|
Income Tax Benefit
|
|
|
(14,566
|
)
|
|
|
(368
|
)
|
|
|
(14,198
|
)
|
|
|
3,858
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(148,296
|
)
|
|
|
62,379
|
|
|
|
(210,675
|
)
|
|
|
(338
|
)%
|
Less: Net (Income) Loss Attributable to the Noncontrolling
Interest
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to the Trico Supply Group
|
|
$
|
(148,288
|
)
|
|
$
|
62,379
|
|
|
$
|
(210,667
|
)
|
|
|
(338
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
The following information on day rate, utilization and average
number of vessels is relevant to our revenues and are the
primary drivers of our revenue fluctuations. Our consolidated
fleets average day rates, utilization, and average number
of vessels by vessel class, for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 were follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Average vessel day rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPSVs(1)
|
|
$
|
28,918
|
|
|
$
|
24,817
|
|
MSVs(2)
|
|
|
74,919
|
(5)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
$
|
155,978
|
(5)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHTSs(3)
|
|
$
|
30,571
|
|
|
$
|
31,024
|
|
PSVs(4)
|
|
|
17,146
|
|
|
|
19,427
|
|
Average vessel utilization rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPSVs
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
MSVs
|
|
|
79
|
%(5)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
93
|
%(5)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHTSs
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
PSVs
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
Average number of vessels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsea Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPSVs
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
MSVs
|
|
|
9.3
|
(5)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
|
|
3.8
|
(5)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Towing and Supply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AHTSs
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
PSVs
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Subsea platform supply vessels
|
|
(2) |
|
Multi-purpose service vessels
|
|
(3) |
|
Anchor handling, towing and supply
vessels
|
|
(4) |
|
Platform supply vessels
|
|
(5) |
|
Results for these vessel classes
reflect the period from May 2008 to December 2008
|
Segment
Results
Subsea Services. Revenues increased
$187.2 million primarily due to the acquisition of
DeepOcean in May 2008, which contributed incremental revenues of
$184.9 million in the subsea services segment in 2008. This
segment also includes revenues of $22.0 million from two
SPSVs that were previously part of our towing and supply
segment. In addition, one new MSV was delivered in the third
quarter of 2008 to support our subsea services in Norway.
Operating loss in 2008 includes a goodwill and intangible
impairment of $133.2 million attributable to the
determination that we had no implied fair value for goodwill
based on a combination of factors at the end of 2008 including
the global economic environment, higher costs of
101
equity and debt capital and our decline in market capitalization
and comparable subsea services companies. Excluding this
impairment, operating income increased $11.0 million. As
discussed above, the increase in operating income is primarily
due to the DeepOcean acquisition which contributed
$7.2 million of operating income, excluding the
impairments, in the subsea services segment following the
inclusion of DeepOceans results since May 16, 2008.
Subsea Trenching and Protection. This segment
was established upon the acquisition of CTC Marine, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of DeepOcean in May 2008 and therefore
there is no comparative prior year information. This
segments day rates are a composite rate that can include
the vessel, crew and equipment. Operating loss in 2008 includes
a goodwill and intangible impairment of $39.6 million.
Towing and Supply. Revenues decreased
$8.6 million, or 7%. Charter hire revenues decreased
$10.6 million in 2008 compared to 2007 due to lower day
rates partially offset by increased utilization for the AHTS and
PSV class vessels. Day rates were negatively affected in 2008 by
the stronger U.S. Dollar.
Operating income decreased $43.2 million, or 77%,
year-over-year
and operating income margin of 11% was down from 45%. Operating
income includes lower revenues of $8.6 million coupled with
increased intercompany expenses of $34.8 million, crew
costs of $3.6 million driven by a highly competitive labor
market and a stronger U.S. Dollar, brokerage fees of
$2.1 million in 2008 related to increased marketing of the
vessels and higher supplies and other operating costs of
$2.0 million due to increased utilization. These decreases
were partially offset by lower classification costs of
$4.8 million due to timing and lower maintenance and
repairs of $7.8 million. Additionally, general and
administrative costs increased by $2.9 million primarily
related to the negative impact of the Norwegian kroner and
British pound strengthening against the U.S. Dollar during
the first half of 2008.
Other
Items
Interest Income. Interest income for 2008 was
$10.6 million, an increase of $7.1 million compared to
2007, due to our acquisition of DeepOcean.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased
$31.4 million in 2008 compared to 2007. The increase is
primarily due to assuming $281.7 million of
DeepOceans and CTC Marines debt in the acquisition.
Until the assumption of the DeepOcean and CTC Marine debt, all
of our interest was being capitalized as a result of the
acquisition of the Active Subsea vessels in November 2007, in
connection with the construction of eight subsea services
vessels and the two vessels that were delivered to us, one in
each of the third and fourth quarters of 2008. Capitalized
interest totaled $18.8 million and $1.4 million in
2008 and 2007, respectively.
Other Expense, Net. Other expense, net
decreased $0.2 million in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily
due to foreign exchange gains as the U.S. Dollar
strengthened against the British Pound and Norwegian Kroner
during the course of 2008. These gains were partially offset by
a foreign currency swap agreement that we settled in June 2008
that was assumed in the acquisition of DeepOcean. Upon
settlement, we received net proceeds of $8.2 million, which
was approximately $2.5 million less than the swap
instruments fair value on May 16, 2008. This
$2.5 million shortfall was recorded as a charge to Other
Expense, net.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax benefit for
2008 was $14.6 million, which is primarily related to the
income generated by our Norwegian operations. Our effective tax
rate was (8.9%) for the year ended December 31, 2008 which
differs from the statutory rate primarily due to tax benefits
associated with the Norwegian tonnage tax regime, our permanent
reinvestment of foreign earnings, foreign taxes and the
impairment of goodwill and certain intangibles that are not
deductible for tax purposes. Also impacting our effective tax
rate was a reduction in Norwegian taxes payable related to a
dividend made between related Norwegian entities during the
first quarter of 2008. Our effective tax rate is subject to wide
variations given its structure and operations. We operate in
many different taxing jurisdictions
102
with differing rates and tax structures. Therefore, a change in
our overall plan could have a significant impact on the
estimated rate.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
Overview
At June 30, 2009, we had available cash of
$22.7 million. This amount and other amounts in this
section reflecting U.S. Dollar equivalents for foreign
denominated debt amounts are translated at currency rates in
effect at June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, payments
due on our contractual obligations during the next twelve months
were approximately $385 million. This includes
$180 million of debt, $136 million of time charter
obligations, $49 million of vessel construction
obligations, $13 million of estimated interest expense and
approximately $6 million of other operating expenses such
as taxes, operating leases, and pension obligations. In
addition, payments of approximately $102 million must be
paid to the lenders under our NOK 350 million revolving
credit facility, NOK 230 million revolving credit facility,
NOK 150 million additional term loan and NOK
200 million overdraft facility on January 1, 2010.
These amounts are included in the debt that is classified as
current as of June 30, 2009. We also expect to make
significant additional capital expenditures over the next twelve
months. However, we have canceled delivery of the Deep
Cygnus, a large newbuild vessel, thereby terminating our
obligation to fund $41.6 million in capital expenditures
and completed negotiations with Tebma to suspend construction of
the remaining four newbuild MPSVs (the Trico Surge, Trico
Sovereign, Trico Seeker and Trico Searcher). Trico
holds the option to cancel construction of the four newbuild
MPSVs after July 15, 2010, which would reduce our committed
future capital expenditures to approximately $40 million on
the three MPSVs we expect to take delivery of by the third
quarter of 2010.
Our working capital and cash flows from operations are directly
related to fleet utilization and vessel day rates. We require
continued access to capital to fund on-going operations, vessel
construction, discretionary capital expenditures and debt
service. Please see Risks and
Uncertainties. We believe that our forecasted cash flows
and current available credit capacity will not be sufficient to
meet our commitments as they come due over the next twelve
months and that we will not be able to remain in compliance with
our debt covenants unless we are able to successfully refinance
$101.7 million outstanding under the SR Bank debt and
$19.9 million outstanding under the 23.3 million
revolving credit facility, each as of June 30, 2009. We are
pursuing the Refinancing Transactions to refinance substantially
all of the debt of the Trico Supply Group (other than
intercompany debt owed to the Parent or its subsidiaries (other
than the Trico Supply Group)) and, in connection with the
offering of notes, will enter into a master intercompany
subordination agreement providing for the subordination of such
intercompany debt to the payment of our obligations under the
notes and guarantees and under the Working Capital Facility. If we fail to complete the Refinancing
Transactions successfully, we will continue our current
dialogues with our lenders to amend our existing facilities and
our efforts to reduce debt outstanding through asset sales. If
neither of these approaches is successful in refinancing certain
debt, we would not be able to remain in compliance with our debt
covenants, and we will be in default under our credit
agreements, which in turn, would constitute an event of default
under all of our outstanding debt agreements. If this were to
occur, all of our outstanding debt would become callable by our
creditors and would be reclassified as a current liability on
our balance sheet. Our inability to repay the outstanding debt,
if it were to become current or if it were called by our
creditors would have a material adverse effect on us and raises
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern.
Our ability to generate or access cash is subject to events
beyond our control, such as declines in expenditures for
exploration, development and production activity, reduction in
global consumption
103
of refined petroleum products, general economic, financial,
competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors. In light
of the current financial turmoil, our lenders may be unable or
unwilling to provide necessary funding in accordance with their
commitments. Depending on the market demand for our vessels and
other growth opportunities that may arise, we may require
additional debt or equity financing. The ability to raise
additional indebtedness may be restricted by the terms of the
8.125% Debentures and the notes being offered hereby, which
restrictions include a prohibition on incurring certain types of
indebtedness if our leverage exceeds a certain level.
The credit markets have been volatile and are experiencing a
shortage in overall liquidity. We have assessed the potential
impact on various aspects of our operations, including, but not
limited to, the continued availability and general
creditworthiness of our debt and financial instrument
counterparties, the impact of market developments on customers
and insurers, and the general recoverability and realizability
of certain financial assets, including customer receivables. To
date, we have not suffered material losses due to nonperformance
by our counterparties. We cannot assure you, however, that our
business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or
that future borrowings will be available to us under our credit
facilities in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our
indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs.
Our indirect subsidiaries, DeepOcean AS, CTC Marine Projects,
DeepOcean Shipping II AS are prohibited under the terms of
the respective loan agreements with SR Bank and Barclays Bank
PLC from paying dividends to their respective parents and from
lending funds via intercompany loans to other subsidiaries. The
inability to transfer funds from these material subsidiaries may
impact the ability of the Trico Supply Group and from meeting
its obligations including debt service.
Other
Liquidity Items
On April 28, 2009, we sold a platform supply vessel for
approximately $26 million in net proceeds. The sale of this
vessel required a prepayment of approximately $14.9 million
for our $200 million revolving credit facility as the
vessel served as security for that facility. We have recently
executed agreements for the sale of two North Sea class vessels
for approximately $40 million.
104
Our third-party debt is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Trico Supply Group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOK 350 million Revolving Credit Facility, maturing
January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
59,790
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
59,790
|
|
|
$
|
3,600
|
|
|
$
|
57,931
|
|
|
$
|
61,531
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
NOK 230 million Revolving Credit Facility, maturing
January 1, 2010
|
|
|
17,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,940
|
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
|
|
18,939
|
|
|
|
21,233
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
NOK 150 million Additional Term Loan, maturing
January 1, 2010
|
|
|
9,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,428
|
|
|
|
3,644
|
|
|
|
6,754
|
|
|
|
10,398
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
NOK 200 million Overdraft Facility, maturing
January 1, 2010
|
|
|
14,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
23.3 million Euro Revolving Credit Facility, maturing
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
19,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,717
|
|
|
|
19,717
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
NOK 260 million Short Term Credit Facility, interest at
9.9%, maturing on February 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
$200 million Revolving Credit Facility maturing May 2013
|
|
|
36,283
|
|
|
|
100,052
|
|
|
|
136,335
|
|
|
|
30,563
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
160,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
$100 million Revolving Credit Facility maturing no later
than December 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,550
|
|
|
|
36,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
$18 million Revolving Credit Facility, maturing
December 5, 2011
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
8 million Sterling Overdraft Facility, maturing
364 days after drawdown
|
|
|
12,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,491
|
|
|
|
9,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.2 million Sterling Asset Financing Revolving Credit
Facility, maturing no later than December 31, 2014
|
|
|
3,659
|
|
|
|
14,046
|
|
|
|
17,705
|
|
|
|
3,238
|
|
|
|
14,048
|
|
|
|
17,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance lease obligations assumed in the acquisition of
DeepOcean, maturing from October 2009 to
Nov-15
|
|
|
2,228
|
|
|
|
11,854
|
|
|
|
14,082
|
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
|
11,947
|
|
|
|
14,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt assumed in the acquisition of DeepOcean
|
|
|
2,545
|
|
|
|
4,771
|
|
|
|
7,316
|
|
|
|
2,716
|
|
|
|
5,979
|
|
|
|
8,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Trico Supply Group third-party
debt(2)
|
|
$
|
180,803
|
|
|
$
|
180,273
|
|
|
$
|
361,076
|
|
|
$
|
71,723
|
|
|
$
|
297,522
|
|
|
$
|
369,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These debt agreements contain
material adverse change provisions. These provisions allow the
lenders to declare an event of default if in their sole and
reasonable opinion, a deterioration in the financial condition
of the borrower will have a negative effect on its ability to
meet its obligations.
|
|
(2) |
|
Excludes intercompany indebtedness
at June 30, 2009 of $570.7 million and
$597.8 million at December 31, 2008, all of which will
be subordinated in right of payment to our obligations under the
notes and guarantees and under the Working Capital Facility
pursuant to the terms of the master intercompany subordination
agreement to be entered into concurrent with the closing of this
offering.
|
105
The following table summarizes the financial covenants under our
debt facilities at June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
Lender(s)
|
|
Borrower
|
|
Entity Guarantor
|
|
Financial Covenants
|
|
$200m Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Nordea Bank Finland PLC/
Bayerische Hypo Und Vereinsbank AG (HVB)
|
|
Trico Shipping AS
|
|
Trico Supply AS
|
|
(1), (2), (3),
(4)
|
$100m Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Nordea Bank Finland PLC/
Bayerische Hypo Und Vereinsbank AG (HVB)
|
|
Trico Subsea AS
|
|
Trico Supply AS
|
|
(1), (2), (3),
(4)
|
NOK 350m Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
SR Bank
|
|
DeepOcean Shipping II
|
|
DeepOcean AS
|
|
(5), (6),
(7)
|
NOK 230m Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
SR Bank
|
|
DeepOcean AS
|
|
None
|
|
(5), (6),
(7)
|
23.3 Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Nordea Bank Norge ASA
|
|
DeepOcean Shipping III
|
|
Trico Supply AS
|
|
(1), (2),
(3)
|
NOK 150m Additional Term Loan
|
|
SR Bank
|
|
DeepOcean AS
|
|
None
|
|
(5), (6),
(7)
|
$18m Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Nordea Bank Norge PLC
|
|
DeepOcean Shipping
|
|
Trico Supply AS
|
|
(1), (2),
(3)
|
£8m Overdraft Facility
|
|
Barclays Bank PLC
|
|
CTC Marine Projects Ltd
|
|
DeepOcean AS (partial up to 100m NOK)
|
|
None
|
£24.2m Asset Financing Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Barclays Bank PLC
|
|
CTC Marine Projects Ltd
|
|
DeepOcean AS (partial up to 100m NOK)
|
|
None
|
NOK 200m Overdraft Facility
|
|
SR Bank
|
|
DeepOcean AS
|
|
None
|
|
(5), (6),
(7)
|
Finance Leases
|
|
SR Bank
|
|
DeepOcean AS
|
|
None
|
|
No maintenance covenants
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consolidated Leverage Ratio: Net
Debt to 12 month rolling EBITDA* less than or equal to
3.50:1 calculated at the Entity Guarantor level (with respect to
the Guarantor party identified in the applicable row of the
table above)
|
|
(2) |
|
Consolidated Net Worth
minimum net worth of Borrower (if Trico Marine Services) or
Entity Guarantor
|
|
(3) |
|
Free Liquidity minimum
unrestricted cash and/or unutilized loan commitments at Borrower
(with respect to the Borrower party identified in the applicable
row of the table above) or Entity Guarantor
|
|
(4) |
|
Collateral coverage
appraised value of collateral (vessels) must exceed 150% of
amount outstanding and amount available
|
|
(5) |
|
Book Equity Ratio Book
Equity divided by Book Assets must exceed 35%. Calculated at the
Entity Guarantor level
|
|
(6) |
|
Leverage Ratio Net
Interest Bearing Debt divided by EBITDA** must be lower than
3:1. Calculated at the Entity Guarantor level
|
|
(7) |
|
Working Capital Ratio
Current Assets must be greater than Current Liabilities
(excluding short-term maturities of debt)
|
|
*
|
|
EBITDA is defined under note (1)
Consolidated Net Income before deducting there from
(i) interest expense, (ii) provisions for taxes based
on income included in Consolidated Net Income,
(iii) amortization and depreciation without giving any
effect to (x) any extraordinary gains or extraordinary
non-cash losses and (y) any gains or losses from sales of
assets other than the sale of inventory in the ordinary course
or business. Prior to December 31, 2009, pro forma
adjustments shall be made for any vessels delivered during the
period as if such vessels were acquired or delivered on the
first day of the relevant 12 month test period.
|
|
**
|
|
EBITDA is defined under
note (6), on a consolidated basis, as the Borrowers
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and
any gain or loss from the sale of assets or other extraordinary
gains or losses.
|
Note: Other covenant related definitions are defined in the
respective credit agreements as previously filed with the SEC.
106
Our most restrictive covenants are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
|
Requirement as
|
|
June 30,
|
|
Requirement to be met
|
Facility
|
|
Financial Covenant
|
|
of June 30, 2009
|
|
2009
Results(1)
|
|
on September 30, 2009
|
|
NOK 350 million Revolving Credit Facility; NOK
230 million Revolving Credit Facility; NOK 150 million
Additional Term Loan; NOK 200 million Overdraft Facility
|
|
Working Capital Ratio
|
|
Current assets divided by current liabilities must be higher
than 1.1
|
|
1.11
|
|
Current assets divided by current liabilities must be higher
than 1.1
|
$200 million Revolving Credit Facility and
$100 million Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Consolidated Leverage Ratio
|
|
Net Debt to 12 month rolling EBITDA less than or equal to
3.50:1
|
|
3.18
|
|
Net Debt to 12 month rolling EBITDA less than or equal to
3.50:1
|
$200 million Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Free Liquidity
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents must exceed $10 million
|
|
$19.5 million
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents must exceed $10 million
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We are in compliance with our debt
covenants at June 30, 2009. Please see Risk
Factors for more details about potential risks involving
these facilities. Amounts in this section reflecting U.S. Dollar
equivalents for foreign denominated debt amounts are translated
at currency rates in effect at June 30, 2009.
|
Equity
Subscription/Contribution Commitment
To formalize a cash management arrangement that ensures the
Issuer maintains a minimum level of liquidity, concurrently with
this offering, Trico Supply AS will enter into an equity
subscription commitment agreement with the Issuer and the
collateral agent, pursuant to which Trico Supply AS will commit
for a period of five years to subscribe for $5 million of
capital stock (or, as applicable, contribute, with a
corresponding increase in the par value of the Issuers
capital stock) of the Issuer each month and, at the request of
the Issuer, up to an additional $1 million of capital stock
of the Issuer each month. The commitment of Trico Supply AS
pursuant to such agreement will not exceed $240 million in
the aggregate. Trico Supply ASs $5 million scheduled
subscription/contribution obligation is mandatory for each month
following the offering through December 2010. Thereafter,
the monthly $5 million scheduled subscription will be at
the Issuers option, if during each day in the five
business day period beginning five business days prior to the
end of each month commencing January 1, 2011, the Issuer
has a minimum of $30 million in unrestricted cash in its
deposit accounts. Trico Supply AS will also undertake to pledge
the shares, if any, subscribed for in accordance with the equity
subscription commitment agreement to the collateral agent to the
extent that such pledge does not give rise to reporting
requirements on the part of the Issuer with the SEC.
Cross Default
Provisions
Our debt facilities contain significant cross default and/or
cross acceleration provisions where a default under one facility
could enable the lenders under other facilities to also declare
events of default and accelerate repayment of their obligations
under these facilities. In general, these cross default/cross
acceleration provisions are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The $100 million credit agreement and the $200 million
credit agreement allow the lenders to declare an event of
default and require immediate repayment if Trico Supply AS or
any of its subsidiaries were to be in default on more than
$10 million in other indebtedness.
|
|
|
|
Under the debt facilities where DeepOcean AS or DeepOcean
Shipping II are the borrowers, the lender may declare an
event of default and require immediate repayment
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
if other indebtedness becomes due and payable prior to its
specified maturity as a result of an event of default.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $18 million revolving credit facility allows the lender
to declare an event of default and require immediate repayment
if the borrower (DeepOcean Shipping) or the guarantor (Trico
Supply AS) is in default on more than $1,000,000 or $5,000,000,
respectively, in other indebtedness.
|
|
|
|
The 23.3 million revolving credit facility allows the
lender to declare an event of default if the borrower defaults
under any other agreement and in the reasonable opinion of the
lender, this default would have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition of the borrower.
|
|
|
|
The £8 million overdraft facility and the
£24.2 million asset financing revolving credit
facility contain cross default provisions where it is an event
of default if borrower (CTC) defaults on its own debt.
|
Recent
Amendments and Waivers.
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2009, the Parent entered into a series of retroactive
amendments to change the method of calculating the minimum net
worth covenant for each of the $200 million revolving
credit facility, the $100 million revolving credit
facility, the $18 million revolving credit facility and the
23.3 million Euro revolving credit facility. These
amendments adjusted the calculation of net worth in order to
permanently eliminate the negative effect on net worth of any
non-cash goodwill adjustments including that which was included
in the December 31, 2008 financial statements. Subsequent
to this adjustment, we were in compliance with these net worth
covenants as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
In April 2009, we received a waiver of the leverage ratios under
the NOK 350 million Revolving Credit Facility, NOK
230 million Revolving Credit Facility, NOK 150 million
Additional Term Loan and the NOK 200 million Overdraft
Facility. In exchange for the waiver, the margin on each
facility referenced above was increased to 275 bps.
|
Our Capital
Requirements
Our on-going capital requirements arise primarily from our need
to improve and enhance our current service offerings, invest in
upgrades of existing vessels, acquire new vessels and provide
working capital to support our operating activities and service
debt. Generally, we provide working capital to our operating
locations through one primary business location: the North Sea.
The North Sea business operations have been capitalized and are
financed on a stand-alone basis. Debt covenants and Norwegian
tax laws make it difficult for us to efficiently transfer the
financial resources from one of these locations for the benefit
of the other.
As a result of changes in Norwegian tax laws in 2007, all
accumulated untaxed shipping profits generated between 1996 and
December 31, 2006 in our tonnage tax company will be
subject to tax at 28%. Two-thirds of the liability
($35.3 million) is payable in equal installments over
9 years. The remaining one-third of the liability
($18.6 million) can be met through qualified environmental
expenditures. As a result of changes in Norwegian tax laws
during the first quarter of 2009, we recognized a one time tax
benefit in earnings of $18.6 million. There is no time
constraint on making any qualified environmental expenditures in
satisfaction of the $18.6 million liability.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our material contractual
commitments at June 30, 2009. In the second quarter of
2009, we withdrew from our partnership with Volstad Maritime AS
which related to the construction of the Deep Cygnus
vessel. We are no longer obligated to fulfill our financial
108
commitment. The change reduced our vessel construction
obligations due in less than one year by $41.6 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
2-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Long-term debt
obligations(1)
|
|
$
|
361,076
|
|
|
$
|
180,803
|
|
|
$
|
77,568
|
|
|
$
|
93,695
|
|
|
$
|
9,010
|
|
Interest on variable rate
debt(2)
|
|
|
51,054
|
|
|
|
13,338
|
|
|
|
19,239
|
|
|
|
11,943
|
|
|
|
6,534
|
|
Vessel construction
obligations(3)
|
|
|
133,194
|
|
|
|
49,224
|
|
|
|
83,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time charter and equipment leases
|
|
|
367,888
|
|
|
|
135,711
|
|
|
|
145,619
|
|
|
|
57,573
|
|
|
|
28,985
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
7,870
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
|
|
2,306
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
Norwegian taxes
payable(4)
|
|
|
35,307
|
|
|
|
2,289
|
|
|
|
8,254
|
|
|
|
8,254
|
|
|
|
16,510
|
|
Pension obligations
|
|
|
6,048
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
3,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
962,437
|
|
|
$
|
384,990
|
|
|
$
|
338,092
|
|
|
$
|
174,092
|
|
|
$
|
65,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The maturities of certain debt
agreements with SR Bank have been amended with approximately
$101.7 million due on January 1, 2010.
Managements intent is to pay the outstanding balances by
January 1, 2010.
|
|
(2) |
|
For the purpose of this calculation
amounts assume interest rates on floating rate obligations
remain unchanged from levels at June 30, 2009, throughout
the life of the obligation.
|
|
(3) |
|
Reflects committed expenditures, of
which approximately $45.3 million will be covered through
increases of the available capacity under our existing credit
facilities when the vessels are delivered ($27.2 million
and $18.1 million of this amount relates to expenditures in
the annual periods ending June 30, 2010 and 2012,
respectively), and does not reflect the future capital
expenditures budgeted for periods presented which are
discretionary. In the second quarter of 2009, we also canceled
the Deep Cygnus, a large newbuild vessel, thereby
terminating our obligation to fund $41.6 million in capital
expenditures, and completed negotiations with Tebma to suspend
construction of the remaining four newbuild MPSVs (the Trico
Surge, Trico Sovereign, Trico Seeker and
Trico Searcher). Trico holds the option to cancel
construction of the four new build MPSVs after July 15,
2010, which would reduce our committed future capital
expenditures to approximately $40 million on the three
MPSVs we expect to be delivered by the third quarter of 2010.
Since the beginning of 2009, we have sold legacy towing and
supply vessels worth $26 million and have executed
agreements for the sale of additional vessels for approximately
$40 million.
|
|
(4) |
|
Norwegian tax laws allow for a
portion of the accumulated untaxed shipping profits,
$35.3 million, prior to June 30, 2009 to be paid in
equal installments over the next 9 years. An additional
liability of $18.6 million could be satisfied through
making qualifying environmental expenditures. As a result of
changes in Norwegian tax laws during the first quarter of 2009.
We recognized a one-time tax benefit in first quarter earnings
of $18.6 million related to the change. We also have
liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $2.3 million at
June 30, 2009 which has not been included in the table
above due to the uncertain timing of settlement.
|
Cash
Flows
The following table sets forth the cash flows for the periods
presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash flow provided by operations
|
|
$
|
44,095
|
|
|
$
|
71,133
|
|
|
$
|
37,123
|
|
|
$
|
55,891
|
|
Cash flow used in investing
|
|
|
(573,796
|
)
|
|
|
(226,131
|
)
|
|
|
(19,744
|
)
|
|
|
(471,839
|
)
|
Cash flow (used in) provided by financing
|
|
|
500,519
|
|
|
|
204,277
|
|
|
|
(61,345
|
)
|
|
|
439,472
|
|
Effects of foreign exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(26,507
|
)
|
|
|
9,722
|
|
|
|
4,763
|
|
|
|
6,437
|
|
Our primary source of cash flow during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 was due to cash from operations with focused
working capital management. The primary uses of cash were for
payments for the purchases of new build vessels and ROVs and
maintenance of other property and equipment, and
109
repayments on our existing credit facilities. During the six
months ended June 30, 2009, our cash balance decreased
$41.8 million to $22.7 million from $64.5 million
at December 31, 2008.
Net Cash from Operating Activities.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 was $37.1 million, a decrease of
$18.8 million from the same period in 2008. The decrease in
operating cash flows is primarily the result of decreased market
activity in the North Sea in 2009 compared to the same period in
2008.
Net cash from operating activities was $44.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to
$71.1 million in 2007. The decrease in operating cash flows
was primarily the result of the decreases in operating income
discussed above, increased expenditures related to the
acquisition of DeepOcean, and overall working capital
requirements related to expanding and establishing our
operations in various regions.
Net cash provided by operating activities for any period will
fluctuate according to the level of business activity for the
applicable period. Net cash from operating activities for the
year 2007 was $71.1 million.
Net Cash from Investing Activities.
Net cash used in investing activities was $19.7 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to
$471.8 million for the same period in 2008. Our investing
cash flow in 2009 primarily reflects $46.1 million of
additions to property and equipment partially offset by
$26.2 million of proceeds from the sale of a platform
supply vessel in April 2009. We anticipate that during the
remainder of 2009 we will spend approximately $35 million
for additional capital expenditures, of which $24 million
is committed. Our investing cash flow in the six months ended
June 30, 2008 primarily reflects our investment in the
acquisition of DeepOcean, net of cash acquired of
$430.8 million and $47.7 million of additions to
property and equipment. Our investing cash flows also include
$8.2 million of proceeds from the sale of a hedging
instrument, and increase in restricted cash of $1.5 million.
Net cash used in investing activities was $573.8 million in
the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to
$226.1 million in 2007. Cash utilized in the year ended
December 31, 2008 was primarily the result of the DeepOcean
acquisition and costs related to the construction of eight MPSV
vessels. We utilized $506.1 million of cash, net of cash
acquired, in connection with the acquisition of DeepOcean. To
fund the transaction we used available cash and intercompany
loans from Trico Marine Services, Inc. Additions to property and
equipment were $74.8 million in 2008, an increase of
$69.4 million over 2007.
We used $226.1 million in investing activities in the year
ended December 31, 2007, $220.4 million of which is
attributed to the Active Subsea acquisition and
$5.4 million for additions to properties and equipment,
partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease of cash
restrictions.
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities.
Net cash used in financing activities was $61.3 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to cash
provided of $439.5 million for the same period in 2008. Our
2009 amount includes net repayments of debt of approximately
$61.3 million. The 2008 amount includes $445.5 million
in financing transactions primarily associated with the
acquisition of DeepOcean, including $3.0 million in debt
issue costs.
Net cash provided by financing activities was
$500.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
which is primarily the result of $475.1 million of net
borrowings, primarily related to debt incurred in connection
with the DeepOcean acquisition.
In 2007, financing activities provided $204.3 million of
cash, which is primarily the result of borrowings on debt from
our subsidiaries.
110
Critical
Accounting Policies
We consider certain accounting policies to be critical policies
due to the significant judgment, estimation processes and
uncertainty involved for each in the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements. We believe the following
represent our critical accounting policies.
Revenue Recognition. We earn and recognize
revenues primarily from the time and bareboat chartering of
vessels to customers based upon daily rates of hire, and by
providing other subsea services. A time charter is a lease
arrangement under which we provide a vessel to a customer and
are responsible for all crewing, insurance and other operating
expenses. In a bareboat charter, we provide only the vessel to
the customer, and the customer assumes responsibility to provide
for all of the vessels operating expenses and generally
assumes all risk of operation. Vessel charters may range from
several days to several years. Other vessel income is generally
related to billings for fuel, bunks, meals and other services
provided to our customers.
Other subsea services revenue, primarily derived from the hiring
of equipment and operators to provide subsea services to our
customers, consists primarily of revenue from billings that
provide for a specific time for operators, material, and
equipment charges, which accrue daily and are billed
periodically for the delivery of subsea services over a
contractual term. Service revenue is generally recognized when a
signed contract or other persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, the service has been provided, the fee is fixed or
determinable, and collection of resulting receivables is
reasonably assured.
In addition, revenue for certain subsea contracts related to
trenching of subsea pipelines, flowlines and cables, and
installation of subsea cables (umbilicals, ISUs, power and
telecommunications) and flexible flowlines is recognized based
on the
percentage-of-completion
method in accordance with the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants Statement of Position
81-1,
Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and
Certain Production-Type Contracts, measured by the
percentage of costs incurred to date to estimated total costs
for each contract. Cost estimates are reviewed monthly as the
work progresses, and adjustments proportionate to the percentage
of completion are reflected in revenue for the period when such
estimates are revised. Claims for extra work or changes in scope
of work are included in revenue when the amount can be reliably
estimated and collection is probable. Losses expected to be
incurred on contracts in progress are charged to operations in
the period such losses are determined.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets. Our goodwill
represents the purchase price in excess of the net amounts
assigned to assets acquired and liabilities we assumed in
connection with the May 2008 acquisition of DeepOcean. Our
reporting units follow our operating segments under
SFAS 131 and goodwill has been recorded related to the
acquisition in two reporting units (1) subsea
services and (2) subsea trenching and protection.
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at
the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual
tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more
likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit
below its carrying value. The goodwill impairment test is a
two-step test. Under the first step, the fair value of the
reporting unit is compared with its carrying value (including
goodwill). If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than
its carrying value, an indication of goodwill impairment exists
for the reporting unit and the enterprise must perform step two
of the impairment test (measurement). Under step two, an
impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying
amount of the reporting units goodwill over the implied
fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill
is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit
in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Statement No. 141, Business
Combinations. The residual fair value after this
allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit
goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its
carrying value, step two does not need to be performed.
111
At December 31, 2008, the measurement date, we performed
the first step of the two-step impairment test proscribed by
SFAS No. 142, and compared the fair value of the
reporting units to its carrying value. In assessing the fair
value of the reporting unit, we used a market approach that
incorporated the Company Specific Stock Price method and the
Guideline Public Company method, each receiving a 50% weighting.
Due to current market conditions, we concluded that the market
approach would be most appropriate in arriving at the fair value
of the reporting units. Key assumptions included our publicly
traded stock price, using a
30-day
average price of $3.98 per share, an implied control premium of
9%, and a fair value of debt based primarily on the price for
our publicly traded debentures. In step one of the impairment
test, the fair value of both the Subsea Services and Subsea
Trenching and Protection reporting units were less than the
carrying value of the net assets of the respective reporting
units, and thus we performed step two of the impairment test.
In step two of the impairment test, we determined the implied
fair value of goodwill and compared it to the carrying value of
the goodwill for each reporting unit. We allocated the fair
value of the reporting units to all of the assets and
liabilities of the respective units as if the reporting unit had
been acquired in a business combination. Our step two analysis
resulted in no implied fair value of goodwill for either
reporting unit, and therefore, we recognized an impairment
charge of $169.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2008,
representing a write-off of the entire amount of our previously
recorded goodwill. This impairment is based on a combination of
factors including the current global economic environment,
higher costs of equity and debt capital and the decline in our
market capitalization and that of comparable subsea services
companies. SFAS No. 142 requires that intangible
assets with estimable useful lives be amortized over their
respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual
values, and reviewed for impairments in accordance with
SFAS No. 144. The intangible assets subject to
amortization are amortized using the straight-line method over
estimated useful lives of 11 to 13 years for the customer
relationships.
Accounting for Long-Lived Assets. We had
approximately $706.2 million in net property and equipment
(excluding assets held for sale) at December 31, 2008,
which comprised approximately 69.1% of our total assets. In
addition to the original cost of these assets, their recorded
value is impacted by a number of policy elections, including the
estimation of useful lives and residual values.
Depreciation for equipment commences once it is placed in
service and depreciation for buildings and leasehold
improvements commences once they are ready for their intended
use. Depreciable lives and salvage values are determined through
economic analysis, reviewing existing fleet plans, and
comparison to competitors that operate similar fleets.
Depreciation for financial statement purposes is provided on the
straight-line method. Residual values are estimated based on our
historical experience with regards to the sale of both vessels
and spare parts, and are established in conjunction with the
estimated useful lives of the vessel. Marine vessels are
depreciated over useful lives ranging from 15 to 35 years
from the date of original acquisition, estimated based on
historical experience for the particular vessel type. Major
modifications, which extend the useful life of marine vessels,
are capitalized and amortized over the adjusted remaining useful
life of the vessel.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. We record
impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when
events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be
impaired as defined by SFAS No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted
future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If
such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be
recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying
amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the
carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. If market
conditions were to decline in market areas in which we operate,
it could require us to evaluate the recoverability of our
long-lived assets, which may result in write-offs or write-downs
on our vessels that may be material individually or in the
aggregate.
112
In connection with completing step two of our goodwill
impairment analysis in the fourth quarter 2008, as further
discussed in Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets above,
we also assessed the current fair values of its other
significant assets including marine vessels and other marine
equipment, concluding that no impairment existed at
December 31, 2008.
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance. We recognize
deferred income tax liabilities and assets for the expected
future tax consequences of events that have been included in the
consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Under this
method, deferred income tax liabilities and assets are
determined based on the difference between the financial
statement and tax bases of liabilities and assets using enacted
tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are
expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce
deferred tax assets to an amount management determines is more
likely than not to be realized in future years.
As of December 31, 2008, we have remaining net operating
losses in certain of our Norwegian entities totaling
$152.9 million, resulting in a deferred tax asset of
$43.4 million. A valuation allowance of $23.4 million
was provided against the financial losses generated in one of
our Norwegian tonnage entities as the loss can only be utilized
against future financial taxable profit and it is not possible
to use group relief to offset taxable profits and losses for
group companies subject to tonnage taxation. The remaining
losses have an indefinite carry forward and will not expire.
Uncertain Tax Positions. FASB Interpretation
No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109, clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial
statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. The interpretation
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and
also provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. We adopted the provisions of
FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. We recognize interest and
penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income
tax expense.
Recent Accounting
Standards
We adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, on January 1, 2008.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles and expands disclosure about fair value
measurements. The net effect of the implementation of
SFAS No. 157 on our financial statements was
immaterial.
On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, deferring
the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at least
annually. The net effect of the implementation of this FSP on
our financial statements was immaterial.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141(R)), which replaces
SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations.
SFAS No. 141(R) retains the underlying concepts of
SFAS No. 141 in that all business combinations are
still required to be accounted for at fair value under the
acquisition method of accounting, but SFAS No. 141(R)
changes the method of applying the acquisition method in a
number of significant aspects. In addition to expanding the
types of transactions that will now qualify as business
combinations, SFAS 141(R) also provides that acquisition
costs will generally be expensed as incurred; noncontrolling
interests will be valued at fair value at the acquisition date;
restructuring costs associated with a business combination will
generally be expensed subsequent to the acquisition date; and
changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income
tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally will
affect income tax expense. SFAS No. 141(R) is
effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of
the first annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008,
with an exception related to the accounting for valuation
allowances on deferred taxes and acquired contingencies related
to acquisitions completed before the effective date.
113
SFAS No. 141(R) amends SFAS No. 109 to
require adjustments, made after the effective date of this
statement, to valuation allowances for acquired deferred tax
assets and income tax positions to be recognized as income tax
expense. SFAS No. 141(R) is required to be adopted
concurrently with SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of
ARB No. 51, and is effective for business combination
transactions for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(FAS 160). FAS 160 states that
accounting and reporting for noncontrolling interests
(previously referred to as minority interests) will be
recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a
component of equity. FAS 160 applies to all entities that
prepare consolidated financial statements, except
not-for-profit
organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an
outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries
or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. This statement is effective
as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year
beginning after December 15, 2008. The provisions of the
standard were applied to all noncontrolling interests
prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure
requirements, which were applied retrospectively to all periods
presented and have been disclosed as such in our consolidated
financial statements contained herein.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. This statement is effective for financial
statements issued for periods beginning after December 15,
2008. This statement conforms certain assumption requirements
between SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Intangibles with SFAS No. 141(R), Business
Combinations with respect to estimating the useful life of
an intangible asset. In addition, the Statement requires certain
additional disclosures about intangible assets. The net effect
of implementing this FSP on our financial statements was
immaterial.
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our market risk exposures primarily include interest rate and
exchange rate fluctuations on financial instruments as detailed
below. The following sections address the significant market
risks associated with our financial activities. Our exposure to
market risk as discussed below includes forward-looking
statements and represents estimates of possible changes in
fair values, future earnings or cash flows that would occur
assuming hypothetical future movements in foreign currency
exchange rates or interest rates. Our views on market risk are
not necessarily indicative of actual results that may occur and
do not represent the maximum possible gains and losses that may
occur, since actual gains and losses will differ from those
estimated, based upon actual fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates, interest rates and the timing of transactions.
Interest Rate
Risk
The table below provides information about our market-sensitive
debt instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Approximate Fair
|
|
|
|
Period Ending December 31,
|
|
|
Value at December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Variable rate
debt(1)
|
|
$
|
71,724
|
|
|
$
|
73,761
|
|
|
$
|
51,872
|
|
|
$
|
47,723
|
|
|
$
|
59,183
|
|
|
$
|
64,983
|
|
|
$
|
415,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
71,724
|
|
|
$
|
73,761
|
|
|
$
|
51,872
|
|
|
$
|
47,723
|
|
|
$
|
59,183
|
|
|
$
|
64,983
|
|
|
$
|
415,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes various credit facilities
and term debt.
|
114
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Our consolidated reporting currency is the U.S. Dollar
although we have substantial operations located outside the
United States. Our subsidiaries use functional currencies
including the U.S. Dollar, the Norwegian Kroner, the Euro
and the British Pound. Thus, we are primarily exposed to
fluctuations in the foreign currency exchange rates for the
Norwegian Kroner and the British Pound relative to the
U.S. Dollar. As a result, the reported amount of our assets
and liabilities related to our
non-U.S. operations
and, therefore, our consolidated financial statements will
fluctuate based upon changes in currency exchange rates.
We manage foreign currency risk by attempting to contract as
much foreign revenue as possible in U.S. Dollars. To the
extent that our foreign subsidiaries revenues are denominated in
U.S. Dollars, changes in foreign currency exchange rates
impact our earnings. This is somewhat mitigated by the amount of
foreign subsidiary expenses that are also denominated in
U.S. Dollars. In order to further mitigate this risk, we
may utilize foreign currency forward contracts to better match
the currency of our revenues and associated costs. We do not use
foreign currency forward contracts for trading or speculative
purposes. The counterparties to these contracts would be limited
to major financial institutions, which would minimize
counterparty credit risk. There were no foreign exchange forward
contracts outstanding during 2008 and there were none
outstanding as of June 30, 2009.
115