Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - FORM 8-K - TRICO MARINE SERVICES INC | h68189xe8vk.htm |
EX-99.2 - EX-99.2 - TRICO MARINE SERVICES INC | h68189xexv99w2.htm |
EX-99.1 - EX-99.1 - TRICO MARINE SERVICES INC | h68189xexv99w1.htm |
EX-99.5 - EX-99.5 - TRICO MARINE SERVICES INC | h68189xexv99w5.htm |
EX-99.4 - EX-99.4 - TRICO MARINE SERVICES INC | h68189xexv99w4.htm |
EX-99.7 - EX-99.7 - TRICO MARINE SERVICES INC | h68189xexv99w7.htm |
EX-99.6 - EX-99.6 - TRICO MARINE SERVICES INC | h68189xexv99w6.htm |
EX-99.8 - EX-99.8 - TRICO MARINE SERVICES INC | h68189xexv99w8.htm |
EX-99.9 - EX-99.9 - TRICO MARINE SERVICES INC | h68189xexv99w9.htm |
EX-99.10 - EX-99.10 - TRICO MARINE SERVICES INC | h68189xexv99w10.htm |
Exhibit 99.3
BUSINESS
We are an integrated provider of subsea services, subsea
trenching and protection services and towing and supply vessels
to oil and natural gas exploration and production companies that
operate in major offshore producing regions around the world.
Historically, we provided only towing and supply vessels. We
acquired Active Subsea ASA and DeepOcean ASA, including its
subsidiary CTC Marine Projects Ltd., during 2007 and 2008,
respectively, for aggregate consideration of approximately
$1.1 billion (approximately $900 million in cash and
$200 million of assumed debt). As a result of these
acquisitions, our subsea operations, including technologically
advanced, and often proprietary services performed in demanding
subsea environments represented approximately 82% of our
revenues for the second quarter of 2009. We operate primarily in
international markets, including the North Sea, West Africa,
Mexico, Brazil, Southeast Asia / China and, to a lesser
extent, in the Gulf of Mexico. We provide all of our services
through our direct and indirect subsidiaries in each of the
markets in which we operate and utilize three operating
segments: (1) subsea services; (2) subsea trenching
and protection; and (3) towing and supply. We operate
internationally through a number of foreign subsidiaries,
including DeepOcean AS, through which we manage our subsea
services segment; CTC Marine Projects Ltd., through which we
manage our subsea trenching and protection segment; and Trico
Shipping AS, the Issuer, which owns our vessels based primarily
in the North Sea. These three subsidiaries and their operations
comprise the Trico Supply Group.
In addition to our international subsidiaries, the Parent owns
27 OSVs, five SPSVs, two AHTSs, one PSV and one Crew / Line
Handler. These vessels are primarily deployed in Southeast
Asia / China, West Africa, Mexico, and the Gulf of Mexico.
Our principal customers are major international oil and natural
gas exploration, development and production companies, NOCs and
telecommunications companies.
Operating
Segments
Subsea
Services
Our 2008 acquisition of DeepOcean added to our operations a
substantial presence in subsea services, which, together with
our subsea trenching and protection segment, currently forms the
primary focus of our business operations. Today we perform our
subsea services under the brand name DeepOcean and primarily
through our DeepOcean subsidiaries, which are all part of the
Trico Supply Group. Our subsea services management team is
seasoned and offers specialized service offerings with a fleet
of modern subsea capable equipment and vessels. The subsea
services segment is highly dependent on DeepOceans
engineering and technical skill sets.
Subsea services span the life-cycle of a well which typically
lasts 20 to 25 years, consisting of one to two years of
exploration, three to five years of construction and
installation, 15 years of production, and one to three
years of decommissioning and abandonment. Subsea services are
required at the beginning of the development of an offshore
field. The initial survey of the seabed floor includes a
topographical map
and/or a
soil sampling to determine what preparation work is necessary
for the installation of subsea infrastructure. Construction and
installation of subsea infrastructure often requires the use of
work-class and observation-class ROVs. Once subsea
infrastructure is in-service, we perform mandated IMR services.
After a well is depleted, production infrastructure from the
platform to the subsea wellhead must be disassembled and
returned to shore, and the seabed must be returned to its
original condition. Trico provides
state-of-the-art
vessels, engineering solutions and equipment to complete all of
these services throughout the life-cycle of the well, including
the initial installation of subsea trees (subsea wellheads) and
other subsea infrastructure.
Customers depend on us for our expertise and track record of
reliable service in harsh conditions, such as those in the North
Sea. For example, we have multiple long term IMR contracts
ranging up to five years in duration with Statoil, which
has one of the largest installed bases of subsea wellheads in
the world and has high technology specifications for its service
providers.
116
We provide our subsea services from six vessels owned by
subsidiaries belonging to the Trico Supply Group, five vessels
owned by our Parent, and seven vessels leased under multi-year
contracts. We are also constructing three new MPSVs, the
Trico Star, Trico Service, and Trico Sea
which are expected to be delivered in the first, second and
third quarters of next year, respectively, and will be assets of
the Trico Supply Group. In addition, we operate a
state-of-the-art
ROV fleet and survey and module handling systems that are
installed on the multi-purpose vessels. The multi-purpose
vessels can also carry saturation diving systems.
Our subsea services business operates primarily in international
markets, with operations in the North Sea, West Africa, the
Mediterranean, Mexico and Brazil. We were recently awarded our
first service contract in the United States as well. We
continually evaluate our vessel composition and subsea services
activity level in each of these regions as well as other market
areas for possible future strategic development.
Subsea
Trenching and Protection
Our 2008 acquisition of CTC Marine added to our operations a
substantial presence in subsea trenching and protection. Today
we provide our subsea trenching and protection services under
the brand name CTC Marine and primarily through our CTC Marine
Projects Ltd. subsidiary, which is part of the Trico Supply
Group. Subsea trenching and protection services include the
utilization of
state-of-the-art
subsea trenching assets and engineering solutions for the burial
of subsea transmission systems, including pipelines, flowlines
and cables, and the installation of subsea infrastructure and
subsea flexible products, including umbilicals and ISUs. Our
customers are comprised of offshore oil and gas exploration and
production companies, including large EPIC contractors who do
not have our specialized capabilities, as well as power
(electricity transmission systems) and telecommunications
(intercontinental and regional systems) companies. We entered
into joint projects with the subsea services segment for
decommissioning services in 2008 and expect to continue joint
projects in 2009. Like our subsea services segment, we have a
seasoned subsea trenching and protection management team that
offers specialized service offerings with a fleet of modern
subsea capable equipment and vessels. Generally, our subsea
trenching and protection projects are between one to twelve
months in duration.
Our subsea trenching and protection business offers customers a
comprehensive solution to a subsea burial project. Our solution
includes providing customers with geotechnical analysis and
engineering solutions including burial techniques and equipment
specification, and performing the burial of the subsea
transmission systems or infrastructure.
We own and operate a sophisticated fleet of subsea trenching
equipment including the RT-1, the largest rock trencher in the
world, and the UT-1, the most powerful jetting trencher in the
world. Our fleet of ploughs, jetters, and tractors is capable of
performing subsea burials in a wide variety of subsea soil and
rock conditions and many of our assets offer highly efficient,
simultaneous digging, burial and covering of subsea transmission
systems. Given that our focus is on designing engineering
solutions, operating our specialized equipment, and continuous
project improvements, we charter all of the vessels from which
our trenching services are performed, including five vessels
leased under multi-year agreements. All of the vessels we
currently utilize are leased under time charter agreements.
The assets we use to provide our subsea trenching and protection
services consist of ploughs, jetters and tractors and are
described in the Glossary of Terms.
The subsea trenching and protection and subsea services segments
are seasonally driven as calmer sea conditions are required to
deploy subsea trenching assets to complete these highly
specialized projects, which tends to result in stronger
operating results in the second and third quarters of the year.
Our historical seasonality is expected to be lessened with the
introduction of vessels into the fleet that are designed for
operations in severe weather conditions and the continued
expansion of our global presence in areas outside of the North
Sea (predominately in Australia, Brazil, Southeast
117
Asia / China, and the Mediterranean), providing a basis for
improved operating results outside of our traditional peak
seasons.
Towing and
Supply
We provide marine support services to the oil and gas industry
through the use of our diversified fleet of vessels. Our
services include: the transportation of drilling materials,
supplies and crews to drilling rigs and other offshore
facilities; towing support for drilling rigs and equipment; and
support for the construction, installation, repair and
maintenance of offshore facilities. Since 2004, we have
successfully increased the international diversification of our
fleet and reduced our towing and supply revenues from our United
States operations from 31% in 2004 to 4% in the second quarter of 2009.
Our marine support services are primarily provided through PSVs,
AHTSs, OSVs, and Crew / Line Handlers. We currently
operate our North Sea towing and supply vessels through the
Issuer and certain entities that are part of the Trico Supply
Group.
The Issuer owns six towing and supply vessels: two AHTSs and
four PSVs. All of these vessels are North Sea class vessels,
which means they can operate in the harsh environments of the
North Sea, and therefore are capable of operating in most
offshore markets around the world.
The Parent, through its subsidiaries outside of the Trico Supply
Group, owns 31 towing and supply vessels: 27 OSVs, two AHTSs,
one PSV and one Crew / Line Handler. These vessels are primarily
deployed in Southeast Asia / China, West Africa, Mexico, and the
Gulf of Mexico. Trico Marine Assets Inc. and its subsidiaries
and the other subsidiaries of the Parent, that own these vessels
and operate this portion of the business are not part of the
Trico Supply Group and will not guarantee the notes.
We operate our towing and supply business primarily in
international markets, with operations in the North Sea, West
Africa, Southeast Asia / China, Mexico, and Brazil. We
continually evaluate our vessel composition and towing and
supply activity level in each of these regions as well as other
market areas for possible future strategic development.
118
Operating
Segment Summary
The following chart summarizes our three business segments.
Subsea Services
|
Subsea Trenching and Protection
|
Towing and Supply
|
||||
Trade name
|
DeepOcean | CTC Marine | Trico Offshore | |||
2009 Second
Quarter Revenue |
$78.9 million
(44% of total) |
$68.3 million
(38% of total) |
$32.5 million
(18% of total) |
|||
Services
|
n IMR,
survey and seabed mapping
|
n Marine
trenching and ploughing
|
n Platform
and rig supply
n Towing of drilling rigs |
|||
n Construction
and installation
n Decommissioning n Subsea vessels |
n Flexible
product installation and burial
n Subsea protection n Subsea commissioning n Subsea vessels |
|||||
Primary Drivers
|
n New
and installed base of subsea trees
n Development of subsea pipeline and production infrastructure n Decommissioning |
n Oil
and gas pipeline burial
n Telecom cable installation n Life of field seismic |
n Offshore
drilling activity
(towing and supply) n Number of platforms (supply) |
|||
Fleet
|
n 10
owned and 8 operated vessels
n 6 years average vessel age |
n 5
operated vessels
n 6 years average vessel age |
n 43
owned(1)
and
3 operated vessels n 21 years average vessel age |
|||
Key Customers
|
n Statoil
n Grupo Diavaz n Petrobras |
n Acergy
n Petrobel/ENI n Alcatel/Lucent n BOETC/COOEC (sub of CNOOC) |
n Statoil
n ExxonMobil n Pemex n Petrobras |
|||
Geographies
|
n North
Sea
n Mexico n Petrobras/Brazil n West Africa n Mediterranean |
n North
Sea
n S.E. Asia/China n Mediterranean n Brazil |
n North
Sea
n West Africa n Mexico n S.E. Asia/China n Petrobras/Brazil |
(1) | Of these vessels, 14 are held by EMSL, a joint venture between the Parent and China Oilfield Services Limited. The Parent holds a 49% equity interest in EMSL. Excludes the vessels Northern Challenger and Northern Clipper, which are under contract for sale, the Northern Corona, which is held for sale and three leased vessels. |
For a discussion of our results of operations by segment and
geography, please see Note 18 to our consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2007 and 2008 and for each of
the three years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008.
Operations by
Region
North
Sea
The North Sea market area consists of offshore Norway, Great
Britain, Denmark, the Netherlands, Germany, Ireland, the area
west of the Shetland Islands and the Barents Sea. The North Sea
has strict vessel requirements which prevent many vessels from
migrating to the area. The operating environment in the North
Sea is demanding due to a strict regulatory environment,
demanding engineering requirements, harsh weather, erratic sea
conditions and water depth. Contracts in the region for subsea
services, subsea trenching and protection services and towing
and supply services are of both short-term and long-term
duration, and can have terms up to five years in length.
Independent oil companies, national oil companies, and major
international oil companies have historically predominated in
drilling and production activities in the North Sea; however,
over the past few years, an increasing number of new, smaller
entrants have purchased existing properties from the
119
traditional participants or acquired leases, leading to an
increase in subsea completions, drilling and construction. We
believe decommissioning activity in the North Sea market will
increase as several of the North Sea fields have been in
existence for over 20 years.
As of June 30, 2009, we had five MSVs actively marketed in
the North Sea, of which four are under term contracts with an
NOC for IMR and survey work projects; we also had three large
capacity PSVs, three large AHTSs, 3 SPSVs and one trenching
vessel actively marketed in the North Sea.
West
Africa
West Africa has become an area of increasing importance for new
offshore exploration for the major international oil companies
and large independents due to the discovery and development of
large oil fields in the region. Several operators have scheduled
additional large scale offshore and subsea projects, and we
believe that demand for our services in this market will grow.
We operate from several ports in West Africa that are managed
from our office in Lagos, Nigeria. In West Africa, we currently
have vessels operating in Nigeria and Angola. Several operators
have scheduled large scale offshore projects, and we believe
that vessel demand in this market will continue to grow. As of
June 30, 2009, we had one Crew / Line Handler and 12 OSVs
actively marketed in West Africa. We are actively marketing our
subsea vessels for operation in Angola, Congo, Cameroon, Gabon,
Ghana and Nigeria through our towing and supply operations in
the region.
Mediterranean
This market consists of the Mediterranean Sea, the Black Sea and
portions of the Middle East region. The fields and pipelines are
being operated by both national and major international oil
companies. Historically we have primarily targeted pipeline
inspection, equipment installations and survey projects in this
area as the region has a significant amount of existing offshore
infrastructure. The Mediterranean subsea market is dominated by
term contracts in relation to the regular inspection campaigns.
We see an increasing demand for these services as well as an
increase in demand for IMR services. As of June 30, 2009,
we had one MSV and one trenching vessel chartered in the
Mediterranean Sea.
Mexico
The Mexican constitution requires that Mexico operate all
hydrocarbon resource activity in the country through its
national oil company, Pemex. The Mexican market is characterized
primarily by term work with most oil fields located in shallow
water. We principally serve the construction and maintenance
market with services to Pemex through its first tier
contractors. We are seeking to increase our services directly to
Pemex and to expand our range of services as the Mexican oil and
gas industry moves into deeper waters and attempts to recover
from the rate of production decline over the last few years. We
believe that vessel demand in this market will continue to grow
in shallow waters and also in relation to ROV services as the
field developments move into deeper waters.
We currently conduct operations from two ports in Mexico that
are managed from our office in Ciudad del Carmen. As of
June 30, 2009, we had a total of nine actively marketed
towing and supply vessels in Mexico, including seven supply
vessels and two Crew / Line Handlers. We also had a total of two
MSVs and one SPSV marketed in Mexico, of which two are on
long-term contracts.
Brazil
Offshore exploration and production activity in Brazil is
concentrated in the deepwater Campos Basin, located 60 to
100 miles from the Brazilian coast. As of June 30,
2009, we had one MSV, one SPSV, one Crew / Line
Handler and one PSV on long-term contracts to Petrobras, the
state-owned oil company and the largest operator in Brazil. The
vessels are being operated from our office in
120
Macae. Significant deepwater field developments are being
planned in Brazil over the coming years, and we expect the
market demand for subsea services and towing and supply vessels
to increase.
Southeast Asia
/ China
This region consists of the coastal regions of China and
countries geographically south of China including Australia,
Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia and Singapore. The
Southeast Asia / China market has experienced rapid
economic growth and in the long-term is projected to continue to
increase its energy consumption. At the current time, a majority
of Tricos activities in the area are concentrated in the
offshore area of China including the Bohai Bay, Nanhai East and
Nanhai West. During 2009, Trico also completed contracts in
Vietnam, Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, Australia and Malaysia.
In 2006, we entered into an agreement with China Oilfield
Services Limited, or COSL, to form Eastern Marine Services
Limited, or EMSL. EMSLs commercial office is located in
Shanghai, China. EMSL provides marine transportation services
for offshore oil and gas exploration, production and related
construction and pipeline projects in China, Australia, and
Southeast Asia. We contributed 14 vessels to EMSL of which
five were mobilized during 2007 with an additional five vessels
in 2008 and one additional vessel in 2009. One of the remaining
three vessels is under contract to be sold. The last two vessels
are operated by us under a management agreement with EMSL.
Expansion into this geographic region is an integral part of our
continued international growth strategy.
We hold a 49% equity interest in EMSL, a Hong Kong limited
liability company in which COSL holds a 51% equity interest.
EMSL provides towing and supply vessels to the oil and gas
industry in China and other countries within Southeast Asia and
Australia. Our interest in EMSL is held through a subsidiary of
Trico Marine Assets Inc.
As of June 30, 2009, we had nine OSVs, one AHTS, one PSV,
one MPSV, one MSV and three trenching vessels in Southeast Asia
/China.
Industry
Overview
As is common throughout the oilfield services industry, marine
contracting is cyclical and typically driven by actual or
anticipated changes in oil and natural gas prices and capital
spending by upstream producers. Sustained high commodity prices
historically have led to increases in expenditures for offshore
drilling and completion activities and, as a result, greater
demand for our services. Despite recent volatility in commodity
prices, we believe the demand for subsea services continues to
grow. This demand is driven in part by the need for opex-related
services. Approximately 50% of Tricos revenues in the
first six months of 2009 were derived from opex projects,
including IMR, well stimulation, live hot taps and well
decommissioning. Such demand is further driven by increased
efficiencies from subsea production techniques: oil produced
from subsea wells is typically cheaper and can be initially
produced in less time than with traditional offshore methods. We
believe that these efficiencies have been the primary catalyst
for growth in subsea production technology over the last five
decades. Since the first subsea installation was performed in
the early 1960s, there has been positive growth in the installed
base of subsea trees every year.
Generally, we believe that the long-term outlook for our
business remains favorable based on the following factors:
Growing
capital spending by oil and natural gas producers.
Despite the recent decline in commodity prices, oil and gas
companies are forecasted to spend significant capital offshore
in order to replenish production and meet the long-term demand
for hydrocarbons. According to a recent report by
Spears & Associates, annual offshore drilling and
completion spending worldwide has risen from $30.0 billion
in 2000 to an estimated $61.9 billion in 2009 and is
expected to reach $75.9 billion by 2014. The level of
upstream spending in offshore
121
regions has generally served as a leading indicator of demand
for marine contracting services. Due to the time required to
drill a well and fabricate a production platform, demand for our
services usually follows exploratory drilling by a period of six
to 18 months and can be longer. Once these wells are
drilled and completed, we also provide services related to the
inspection and maintenance of offshore fields.
International
offshore activity.
According to a recent report by Spears & Associates,
international offshore drilling and completion spending accounts
for approximately 80% of worldwide offshore drilling and
completion spending. In many international markets, significant
production infrastructure work is required over the next several
years to develop new oil and natural gas discoveries. We believe
that we are well positioned to capture a growing share of this
work given the broad scope of our operating capabilities
relative to the smaller regional providers that presently serve
these markets. The size and complexity of these projects often
require long-term commitments, funding capabilities and
expertise akin to that of the major oil and natural gas
companies, large independents or NOCs. In our view, these
international projects, unlike those in the Gulf of Mexico where
the volume of work is highly sensitive to changes in commodity
prices, are driven by less volatile economic and social factors
such as the need to reduce oil imports and social spending
demands (such as in Mexico).
Aging subsea
infrastructure worldwide.
Subsea completions began in the early 1960s. Industry research
predicts that 89% of the more than 3,000 subsea completions
expected to be performed over the next five years will be
completed in water depths of 6,000 feet or less. Servicing
installations at such depths is our core market. These
structures are generally subject to extensive periodic
inspections, require frequent maintenance and will ultimately be
decommissioned as mandated by various regulatory agencies.
Consequently, we believe demand for our IMR, decommissioning and
abandonment services will remain strong. We also believe that
regulatory requirements make demand for these services less
discretionary, and therefore less volatile, than for services
arising from exploration, development and production activities.
A good illustration of the demand for such services is our
five-year IMR contract with Statoil, which specifically covers
the inspection, maintenance and repair of its infrastructure in
the North Sea (expiring in 2011).
Competition
Subsea
Services
Competition in the subsea services market is primarily driven by
the level of engineering services required, the history or
track record of the service provider, suitable
vessel and equipment capacity and specifications, personnel
capacity, and ability and experience in performing contracts at
competitive rates. Suitable vessels include all vessels capable
of deploying ROV and survey systems. Vessels range in size from
200 feet to over 300 feet in length. Key factors
related to subsea service vessels and related equipment (such as
ROVs and survey systems) are engineering expertise, competitive
day rates, overall availability, regularity, quality and
capacity. Our competitors range from small, private companies
providing single subsea services to large integrated subsea
service companies. A sample list of potential competitors would
include, but not be limited to, Acergy, DOF Subsea, Oceaneering,
Canyon Offshore and Subsea7. Although the subsea segment is
highly competitive and several of our competitors have greater
financial and other resources and more experience operating in
international areas than we have, we believe that our project
management and engineering expertise and capacity, as well as
our strong safety record and general experience in similar
operations represents a key competitive advantage for us in the
subsea services market allowing us to compete effectively.
122
Subsea
Trenching and Protection
The subsea trenching and protection services market is highly
competitive and includes: design, procurement, lay and burial of
subsea structures. The extent to which some or all of these
services are required by a customer under a contract will impact
the overall degree of competition for such contacts. Our
customers in this segment include oil and gas exploration, power
and telecommunications companies. We are awarded contracts that
include differing work scopes, but specialize in and have a
competitive advantage related to projects that include all
significant elements described above. We have the capability of
completing all forms of trenching (ploughing, jetting, and
cutting). We compete against other methods of subsea burial,
such as rock-dumping, which is the method of dropping rock on a
product to protect the product. Other key competitive factors
include contract pricing, service, safety record, reputation of
vessel operators and crews and availability and quality of
vessels of the type and size required by the customer. Our
competitors in this market include Canyon and Nexans in the oil
and gas sector and Subocean and Oceanteam in the renewable
sector.
Towing and
Supply
The level of offshore oil and gas drilling, production and
construction activity primarily determines the demand and
competition for our marine support vessels. Such activity is
typically influenced by exploration and development budgets of
oil and gas companies, which in turn are influenced by oil and
gas commodity prices. The number of drilling rigs in our market
areas is a leading indicator of drilling activity. In addition,
the overall age of vessels is a key consideration for our
customers. Each of the geographic regions below is highly
competitive with many companies having a global presence.
Tidewater, Bourbon, Farstad, Gulfmark and Seacor are the largest
of the international competitors in the Asia Pacific region;
however, the region is more dominated in terms of tonnage
capacity by the regional players with growing fleets such as
Bumi Armada, Pacific Richfield, Swire Pacific, CH Offshore/Scomi
and PTSC to name a few. Certain jurisdictions are implementing
more stringent home flagging requirements on longer term
(1 year or more) contracts. This creates an automatic
competitive advantage in the marketplace for the smaller
domestic operators as the oil and gas companies are compelled to
select a home-flagged vessel over foreign flag if one is
available.
In Brazil, European ship owners compete together with Tidewater,
Seacor, Choest and Hornbeck foreign and Brazilian flag vessels
with local navigation companies like CBO to support Petrobras
and other foreign oil companies in their offshore activities.
Age and local content are critical factors. The same is true for
Mexico but with less activity for local companies in high-end
vessels. Age is becoming a critical competitive factor but price
dominates.
The North Sea region has strict vessel requirements due to the
harsh conditions which prevent many vessels from migrating to
the area. Contracting in the region is generally for term work
and often for multiple years. International competitors include
Tidewater, Bourbon, Seacor, Maersk, Gulfmark along with regional
competitors that include North Sea Norwegian DOF,
Aries Offshore, Eidesvik, Farstad Shipping, Havila Shipping,
Island Offshore, Siem Offshore, Olympic Shipping, Volstad
Maritime, Troms Offshore and Viking Supply Ships.
Competitive
Strengths
Well
positioned to capture growth in offshore subsea
spending.
Since November 2007, we have been transforming Trico into a
subsea services provider. We believe that the demand for subsea
services will continue to grow due to increasing demand for more
subsea trees which we refer to as positive unit
volume growth. Since the first subsea completion was performed
in the early 1960s, there has been positive growth in the
installed base of subsea trees every year.
123
Global subsea market spending is expected to increase by
approximately 9% to more than $40 billion by 2012. We
classify this type of spending as capex spending as
it is related to the installation of new subsea infrastructure,
and we believe it is largely tied to both the offshore
exploration for new oil discoveries and technology driven
improvements in the recovery of existing oil reserves.
With the growing base of installed subsea infrastructure, we
believe that there will also be a greater need for on-going IMR
services. We refer to this work as opex, which is
recurring in nature and related to expenses required to maintain
subsea infrastructure. Our key markets, which include the North
Sea, Brazil, and West Africa, are expected to have approximately
1,100, 600, and 600 sub trees, respectively, greater than five
years of age in 2012, which will account for more than 40% of
subsea trees worldwide. As subsea infrastructure ages, it
becomes increasingly important to perform routine IMR work to
ensure the operational integrity of equipment. In some
jurisdictions, such as the North Sea, certain IMR services are
required by regulatory authorities. We also believe that other
jurisdictions will continue to increase regulatory requirements
for IMR, and offshore oil and natural gas producers will pursue
IMR activities on this larger base of subsea infrastructure to
maintain its economic productivity.
Subsea completions began in the early 1960s, and we believe we
are entering an unprecedented era for the number of subsea wells
that will be abandoned. The abandonment of subsea wells
worldwide is expected to grow by 18% from 2009 to 2013. We
expect that this phenomenon will persist well into the future
and that the abandonment and platform decommissioning will
provide stable business prospects for the Trico Supply Group.
Distinctive
subsea services business model.
We believe that our distinctive capabilities and track record
provide a sustainable competitive advantage. Our customers place
a premium on certainty of execution and our track record. As the
subsea services sector addresses new challenges brought on by
deeper water depths, wells drilled to a deeper depth and older
infrastructure, our capabilities will give us an edge in
developing
state-of-the-art
technologies and solutions for our customers. It is our belief
that our growing resume and experience will further cement our
relationships with existing customers and better position us to
win new business.
We believe that our business has attractive financial
characteristics including a day rate compensation model and the
opportunity for long-term IMR and frame agreements. When we
enter into a contract for a subsea services project, we bill for
our services on a day rate rather than lump-sum basis. This
allows us to limit the risk of cost overruns associated with
timing delays beyond our control or poor estimates for the scope
and cost of the project. Our IMR and frame agreements for
construction services have terms as long as five years. We
currently have three five-year agreements with Statoil, one
two-year agreement with Petrobras and one five-year agreement
with a contractor of Pemex.
Geographically
diverse business model.
We believe our internationally diverse platform reduces
Tricos exposure to a single market and has allowed Trico
to position its fleet and service capabilities in markets with
higher barriers to entry, lower volatility of day rates and
greater potential for increasing day rates.
Global offshore spending is expected to increase by
approximately 40% through 2013, led primarily by international
spending. According to a recent report by Spears &
Associates, a petroleum industry consulting firm, the global
offshore rig count is expected to increase by 51 rigs over the
next five years. The international offshore rig market, which is
projected to grow by 15% (37 rigs), is the primary driver for
this growth, further solidifying the expectation that offshore
international markets will experience material growth in the
coming years. Approximately 99% of Tricos revenues in the
second quarter of 2009 were produced in markets outside the
United States, such as the North Sea,
124
Southeast Asia / China, West Africa, Mexico and
Brazil. Consequently, we believe we are well positioned to
benefit from growth in international spending.
In establishing itself as an international towing and supply
provider in major offshore oil and gas basins around the world,
Trico has established relationships with multiple major oil
companies and NOCs. Since the acquisitions of DeepOcean and
Active Subsea, we have successfully leveraged these towing and
supply relationships around the world in order to win business
for our subsea services and subsea trenching and protection
segments.
See Note 18 of the notes to our consolidated financial
statements included in this offering memorandum for financial
information about geographic areas.
Strong
collateral value.
The fleet of vessels and specialized subsea equipment of the
Trico Supply Group has an aggregate value of approximately
$672 million including newbuild vessels not to be delivered
until 2010. The aggregate collateral value is based on
(i) limited third party appraisals completed in March and
June 2009, and in the case of our CTC Marine units
specialized equipment, July 2009 and (ii) in the case of
approximately $69 million of DeepOceans specialized
equipment, the book value (based on depreciated historical cost,
without any appraisal). The information below includes three new
multi-purpose platform supply vessels which we expect to be
delivered in the first, second and third quarters of 2010,
respectively.
Year |
Appraisal |
|||||||||||
Holding |
Built/ |
Value |
||||||||||
Vessel name
|
Classification |
Location
|
Subsidiary
|
Refurbished | (In millions)(1)(2) | |||||||
Atlantic Challenger
|
MSV(3) | Southeast Asia / China | DeepOcean Shipping AS | 1990/1998 | $32 | |||||||
Deep Endeavour
|
MSV | Mexico | DeepOcean Shipping II AS | 1999/2004 | 78 | |||||||
Arbol
Grande(4)
|
MSV | Mexico | DeepOcean Shipping III AS | 2003 | 69 | |||||||
Trico Sabre
|
MPSV | Southeast Asia / China | Trico Subsea AS | 2009 | 40 | |||||||
Northern Canyon
|
SPSV | North Sea | Trico Shipping AS | 2002 | 50 | |||||||
Northern River
|
SPSV | North Sea | Trico Shipping AS | 1998 | 45 | |||||||
Northern Commander
|
AHTS | North Sea | Trico Shipping AS | 1986 | 26 | |||||||
Northern Crusader
|
AHTS | North Sea | Trico Shipping AS | 1992 | 33 | |||||||
Northern Queen
|
PSV | North Sea | Trico Shipping AS | 1982 | 8 | |||||||
Northern Supporter
|
PSV | North Sea | Trico Shipping AS | 1996 | 20 | |||||||
Northern Wave
|
PSV | North Sea | Trico Shipping AS | 2002 | 47 | |||||||
Northern Princess
|
PSV | Brazil | Trico Shipping AS | 1983 | 5 | |||||||
Total Existing Vessel Appraisal Value
|
$453 | |||||||||||
Trico
Star(5)
|
MPSV | Newbuild | Trico Subsea AS | 2010 | 40 | |||||||
Trico
Service(5)
|
MPSV | Newbuild | Trico Subsea AS | 2010 | 40 | |||||||
Trico
Sea(5)
|
MPSV | Newbuild | Trico Subsea AS | 2010 | 40 | |||||||
Total Newbuild (Under Construction) Appraisal Value
|
$120 | |||||||||||
Less Remaining Capital
Expenditures(6)
|
($40 | ) | ||||||||||
Net Newbuild (Under Construction) Appraisal Value
|
$80 | |||||||||||
Total CTC Marine Specialized Equipment Appraisal Value
|
$70 | |||||||||||
Total DeepOcean Specialized Equipment Net Book Value
|
$69 | |||||||||||
Total Estimated Collateral Value
|
$672 |
(1) | The limited third party appraisals used to value these vessels were based solely on information about the vessels stipulated in standard reference books, not information about the actual physical condition of the vessels. See Risk Factors, p. 28: The appraisals used to value our vessels are limited, do not take into account important information and may not accurately reflect the market value of our assets. | |
(2) | Based on conversion rates, at September 30, 2009, of 1 U.S. dollar to 5.8444 Norwegian kroner and 1 British pound to 1.5922 U.S. dollars. | |
(3) | MSVs are multi-purpose service vessels. | |
(4) | We currently lease this vessel under a long-term bareboat charter with an unaffiliated special purpose vehicle that was established to own and lease this vessel. We have paid, in advance, all |
125
charter payments to the vessel owner required under the bareboat charter. We have a call option that may be exercised to acquire the vessel at the expiration of the bareboat charter in May 2010 for approximately Euro 3 million, which amount has already been paid into an escrow account in favor of the owner. In connection with the closing of this offering, we intend to acquire the vessel and establish a mortgage in favor of the collateral agent. We are currently in negotiations with the vessel owner for the purchase of the vessel, but there is no assurance that we will be able to complete the acquisition of the vessel prior to the closing of this offering. | ||
(5) | The appraisal represents the value of the newbuild vessels as delivered. | |
(6) | Remaining required capital expenditures related to the construction of the Trico Star, Trico Service and Trico Sea. These vessels are being constructed under fixed-price contracts and are of the same design as the Trico Sabre, which was delivered in March of 2009. To the extent we submit change orders, we will incur additional costs. |
Strategy
Our strategy focuses on improving the quality and stability of
our cash flows while creating stockholder value.
Expand our
presence in additional subsea services markets.
In contrast to the overall market served by our traditional
towing and supply business, we believe the subsea market is
growing and will provide a higher rate of return on our
services. We have increased our marketing efforts to expand our
subsea services business in West Africa, Southeast Asia /
China, Brazil, the United States and Mexico. For the second
quarter of 2009, our aggregate revenues in these markets
represented 33% of revenue in subsea operations. Through our
legacy towing and supply business, we have strong relationships
with important customers such as Pemex, Statoil, and CNOOC and
an intimate understanding of their bidding procedures, technical
requirements and needs. We are leveraging this infrastructure to
expand our subsea services and subsea trenching and protection
businesses around the world.
Maintain
leadership by continued focus on innovation and
improvement.
We believe that by working under several long-term contracts in
the North Sea, which has one of the largest and oldest installed
bases of subsea equipment, we are provided opportunities to
improve our subsea service offering that our competitors and
newcomers do not have. This includes developing new techniques
or proprietary equipment to meet our customers needs,
reducing costs to improve our profitability, and identifying and
solving new challenges for our customers such as those arising
from increasingly older subsea infrastructure. We believe our
aggregate resume defined as our list of
capabilities and accomplishments further entrenches
us with our existing customers and better positions us to win
business in emerging subsea markets like Southeast Asia /
China, Brazil, the Gulf of Mexico and West Africa. For example,
DeepOcean recently assisted Statoil in completing the deepest
hot tap (intervention) into a live pipeline in the
North Sea region. We believe this type of skill set will enable
us to assist NOCs in China, where the age and maintenance level
of pipelines suggest such a skill set will be particularly
valuable.
126
Maximize our
service spreads and our vessel utilization.
We continue to increase the size of our combined subsea services
and subsea trenching and protection fleet primarily through
chartering of third-party vessels. We offer our customers a
variety of subsea installation, construction, trenching and
protection services using combinations of our equipment and
personnel to maximize earnings per vessel and to increase the
opportunity to offer a differentiated adaptable technology
service package. We also pursue term contracts and frame
agreements which increase vessel utilization and often provide
advantages in sourcing new business. We currently have frame
agreements in place with Statoil.
Reduce our
debt level and carefully manage our cash flow.
We are committed to restoring the financial flexibility provided
by a strong balance sheet. Although our efforts have been
restricted by the global financial crisis of the past
12 months, recently the Parent exchanged
$253.5 million of its 6.5% senior convertible debentures
due 2028 for $202.8 million of Parents 8.125%
Debentures, cash of approximately $12.7 million, and
3,042,180 shares of common stock (or warrants exercisable
for $0.01 per share in lieu thereof). This action reduced the
principal amount by the total debt outstanding by
$50.7 million and gives us the option to satisfy
amortization obligations under the new debentures in stock. We
have also canceled the Deep Cygnus, a large newbuild
vessel, thereby terminating our obligation to fund
$41.6 million in capital expenditures and completed
negotiations with Tebma to suspend construction of the remaining
four newbuild MPSVs (the Trico Surge, Trico
Sovereign, Trico Seeker and Trico Searcher).
Trico holds the option to cancel construction of the four
newbuild MPSVs after July 15, 2010 which would reduce our
committed future capital expenditures to approximately
$40 million on the three MPSVs we expect to be delivered by
the end of the third quarter of 2010. Since the beginning of
2009, we have sold legacy towing and supply vessels worth
$30 million and have executed agreements for the sale of
additional vessels for approximately $40 million. We have
used and intend to continue to use proceeds from asset sales to
reduce outstanding debt. This offering will substantially reduce
near-term maturities and better align our debt obligation with
our more stable, cash flow producing business segments.
127
The following table sets forth additional information regarding
each company in our group. This table includes subsidiaries that
are not reflected in the chart above:
Place of |
||||
Company name
|
Incorporation |
Primary Activity
|
||
Trico Supply
|
||||
Trico Supply AS
|
Norway | Holding company for Trico Shipping AS, DeepOcean and CTC subsidiaries; employs offshore workers in Norway and provides crewing and other vessel management to Trico Shipping | ||
Trico Shipping AS
|
Norway | Towing and supply operations primarily in the North Sea, including the Northern Commander, Northern Crusader, Northern Queen, Northern Supporter, Northern Wave, Northern Princess, Northern Canyon and Northern River. Parent of other towing and supply companies. | ||
Trico Subsea Holding AS
|
Norway | Holding company and parent of Trico Subsea AS. | ||
Trico Subsea AS
|
Norway | Owner of Trico Sabre, which it charters out to customers and other Trico companies. Party to newbuild shipbuilding contracts for Trico Star (expected delivery first quarter 2010), Trico Service (expected deliver second quarter 2010) and Trico Sea (expected delivery third quarter 2010).(1) | ||
DeepOcean
|
||||
DeepOcean Shipping III AS
|
Norway | Lessee of the Arbol Grande, which it charters out to customers and other Trico companies. | ||
DeepOcean Shipping II AS
|
Norway | Owner of the Deep Endeavour, which it charters out to customers and other Trico companies. | ||
DeepOcean Shipping AS
|
Norway | Owner of the Atlantic Challenger, which it charters out to customers and other Trico companies. | ||
DeepOcean AS
|
Norway | Subsea services operations. Ultimate parent of other DeepOcean subsea services companies. | ||
DeepOcean Brasil Servicos Ltda.
|
Brazil | Subsea services operations in Brazil. | ||
DeepOcean Maritime AS
|
Norway | Subsea services operations. | ||
DeepOcean Subsea Services Ltd.
|
UK | Subsea services operations. | ||
DeepOcean UK Ltd.
|
Scotland | Subsea services operations. | ||
DeepOcean BV
|
Netherlands | Subsea services operations. | ||
DeepOcean Management AS
|
Norway | DeepOcean employer. | ||
DeepOcean de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.
|
Mexico | Subsea services operations in Mexico. | ||
Trico Supply (UK) Limited
|
England and Wales | Management and operating support for vessels used in Tricos towing and supply and subsea business segments. |
129
Place of |
||||
Company name
|
Incorporation |
Primary Activity
|
||
Albyn Marine Limited
|
Scotland | Crew employer. | ||
Servicios Especializado S. de R.L. de C.V.
|
Mexico | Employer. | ||
Servicios Administrativo S. de R.L. de C.V.
|
Mexico | Employer. | ||
CTC
|
||||
CTC Marine Projects Ltd.
|
UK | Subsea trenching and protection operations. Parent of other trenching and protection services companies. | ||
CTC Marine Norway AS
|
Norway | Local entity to strengthen marketing in North Sea. | ||
CTC Guernsey Ltd.
|
Guernsey | Employer. |
(1) | While Trico Subsea is party to seven total newbuild shipbuilding contracts, the shipbuilder has agreed to suspend construction with respect to the last four newbuild vessels. |
130
Our
Fleet
Our vessels are used to support the installation, repair and
maintenance of offshore facilities, the deployment of underwater
ROVs, sea floor cable laying and trenching services, to
transport equipment, supplies and personnel to drilling rigs and
to tow drilling rigs and equipment. As of June 30, 2009,
our fleet consisted of 69 owned or operated vessels (excluding
the Northern Challenger and Northern Clipper,
which are under contract for sale, and the Northern
Corona which is held for sale), including seven SPSVs, one
MPSV, ten MSVs, five trenching vessels, 33 OSVs, five large
capacity PSVs, four large AHTSs, and four Crew / Line Handlers.
Additionally, we have three new MPSVs on order, which are
expected to be delivered in the first, second and third quarters
of next year.
The principal types of vessels that we operate are described in
the Glossary of Terms. The following table sets forth
information regarding the vessels operated by us and vessels on
order as of June 30, 2009 excluding assets for sale:
Number of |
||||||||||||
Type of vessel
|
Vessels(1) | Length | Horsepower | |||||||||
Existing Fleet:
|
||||||||||||
MSVs
|
10 | 200 426 | 4,788 17,795 | |||||||||
MPSVs
|
1 | 241 | 6,222 | |||||||||
SPSVs
|
7 | 200 304 | 3,000 10,800 | |||||||||
PSVs
|
5 | 190 280 | 4,050 10,800 | |||||||||
AHTSs
|
4 | 212 261 | 11,140 15,612 | |||||||||
OSVs
|
33 | 166 230 | 2,000 6,140 | |||||||||
Crew / Line Handlers
|
4 | 110 155 | 1,200 6,750 | |||||||||
Subsea Trenching and Protection Vessels
|
5 | 295 351 | 10,440 23,480 | |||||||||
On Order:
|
||||||||||||
MPSVs
|
3 | 241 | 6,222 |
(1) | Vessel count includes 3 leased Crew / Line Handlers, 7 leased MSVs, 5 leased trenching support vessels, as well as 7 OSVs held by NAMESE in which the Parent holds a 49% interest. |
As of June 30, 2009, the average age of our subsea fleet of
vessels was six years and the average age of our overall fleet
was 16 years. Generally, a vessels age is determined
based on the date of construction. However, if a major
refurbishment is performed that significantly increases the
estimated life of the vessel; we calculate the vessels age
based on either the construction date or the refurbishment date.
Dispositions
of Certain Assets
Consistent with our strategy to reduce indebtedness, further
streamline our operations and to focus on core assets, we
initiated a strategy in 2006 to dispose of our older, less
utilized marine assets. This process resulted in the sale of
four vessels in 2008, three vessels in 2007 and four vessels in
2006. So far in 2009, we have sold six vessels and expect to
close the sale of two to three additional vessels before year
end, one of which is scheduled to close in early October 2009
and another of which is scheduled to close in late October 2009
and is subject to delivery and inspection in Hong Kong. We have
used and intend to continue to use proceeds from asset sales to
reduce outstanding debt.
Our Customers and
Charter Terms
Our principal customers in the North Sea, Mexico, Brazil and
Southeast Asia / China are major integrated oil companies and
large independent oil and gas companies as well as foreign
government owned or controlled companies that provide logistics,
construction and other services to such oil companies and
foreign government organizations. The charters with these
customers are industry standard time charters. Current charters
in these areas include periods ranging from spot contracts of
131
just a few days or months to long-term contracts of several
years. Our revenue model is to charge a day rate for
our services. We do not currently operate under any lump sum
contracts.
Most of our charters in the Gulf of Mexico are short-term
contracts (60 to 90 days) or spot contracts (less than
30 days) and are cancelable upon short notice. Because of
frequent renewals, the stated duration of charters frequently
has little relation to the actual time vessels are chartered to
a particular customer. In addition, some of our long-term
contracts contain early termination options in favor of our
customers. See Risk Factors, p. 36: The early
termination of contracts on our vessels could have an adverse
effect on our operations.
The table below shows our contract coverage if none of the
option periods are ratified by our customers (without options)
and if all of the option periods are ratified by our customers
(with options). A summary of the average terms and day rates of
those contracts is as follows:
Year Ending |
Year Ending |
|||||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
% of |
||||||||||||||||
Total |
% of Total |
|||||||||||||||
Days |
Days |
|||||||||||||||
Under |
Average |
Under |
Average |
|||||||||||||
Type of vessel
|
Contract | Day Rate | Contract | Day Rate | ||||||||||||
Without Options | ||||||||||||||||
AHTSs
(4 vessels)(1)
|
65 | % | $ | 16,154 | 25 | % | $ | 19,808 | ||||||||
PSVs (5 vessels)
|
79 | % | 17,656 | 7 | % | 16,268 | ||||||||||
OSVs
(28 vessels)(2)
|
20 | % | 11,021 | 5 | % | 13,972 | ||||||||||
Crew / Line Handling Boats (4 active)
|
81 | % | 6,087 | 27 | % | 6,250 | ||||||||||
MSVs (10 vessels)
|
68 | % | 83,361 | 38 | % | 79,628 | ||||||||||
SPSVs (7 vessels)
|
58 | % | 26,063 | 43 | % | 18,064 | ||||||||||
Subsea Trenching and Protection (5 vessels)
|
53 | % | 122,559 | 12 | % | 107,292 | ||||||||||
MPSV (1 vessel)
|
100 | % | 26,000 | 63 | % | 26,000 | ||||||||||
With Options | ||||||||||||||||
AHTSs
(4 vessels)(1)
|
71 | % | $ | 15,474 | 50 | % | $ | 13,696 | ||||||||
PSVs (5 vessels)
|
79 | % | 17,656 | 60 | % | 19,668 | ||||||||||
OSVs
(28 vessels)(2)
|
21 | % | 10,919 | 11 | % | 14,000 | ||||||||||
Crew / Line Handling Boats (4 active)
|
94 | % | 6,256 | 27 | % | 6,250 | ||||||||||
MSVs (10 vessels)
|
76 | % | 84,168 | 50 | % | 79,378 | ||||||||||
SPSVs (7 vessels)
|
58 | % | 26,438 | 57 | % | 23,563 | ||||||||||
Subsea Trenching and Protection (5 vessels)
|
54 | % | 122,351 | 12 | % | 107,292 | ||||||||||
MPSV (1 vessel)
|
100 | % | 26,000 | 100 | % | 26,000 |
(1) | The day rate for the AHTS class includes one vessel operating under a bareboat charter. | |
(2) | In 2007, five of our OSVs entered into bareboat contracts which decreased average supply vessel day rates. Including the five vessels under bareboat agreements, our average day rates for vessels without options would be $6,157 and $3,324 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 respectively; our average day rates for vessels with options would be $6,199 and $5,618 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively. |
Due to changes in market conditions since the commencement of
the contracts, average contracted day rates could be more or
less favorable than market rates at any one point in time.
Charters are obtained through competitive bidding or, with
certain customers, through negotiation. The percentage of
revenues attributable to an individual customer varies from time
to time, depending on the level of exploration and development
activities undertaken by a particular customer, the availability
and suitability of our vessels for the customers projects,
and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
132
Two of our customers, Grupo Diavaz and Statoil, each represented
more than 10% of our consolidated revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2008. Two of our customers, Statoil and Blue Whale Offshore
Engineering Technology Company, or Blue Whale, each represented
more than 10% of our consolidated revenues for the six months
ended June 30, 2009. There were no customers that represented 10% of our consolidated
revenues in 2007 or 2006.
Vessel
Maintenance
We incur routine drydock inspection, maintenance and repair
costs under U.S. Coast Guard regulations and to maintain
American Bureau of Shipping, Det Norske Veritas, or other
certifications for our vessels. In addition to complying with
these requirements, we also have our own comprehensive vessel
maintenance program that we believe allows us to continue to
provide our customers with well maintained, reliable vessels.
Under our maintenance program, we are able to schedule
maintenance more effectively through a proactive maintenance
strategy instead of following a maintenance schedule dictated by
regulatory compliance. In connection with this program, we have
also established a centralized global drydocking group and a
global procurement department to address the maintenance needs
of our increasingly international fleet of vessels. Our
centralized procurement department was developed in light of our
rapid growth in international markets and increasing vessel
operating expenses, which required a sustainable cost reduction
program that enables economies of scale, more effective cost
management and process visibility across all regions.
We expect that these additions will provide us with better
control over processes and procedures that are implemented
during each drydocking period and stronger controls over
maintenance budgets that will ultimately reduce the amount of
time for each vessels drydocking.
We incurred approximately $17.6 million,
$16.9 million, and $20.4 million in drydocking and
marine inspection costs in the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which we expense as incurred.
Non-regulatory drydocking expenditures that are considered major
modifications, such as lengthening a vessel, installing new
equipment or technology and performing other procedures which
extend the useful life of the marine vessel, are capitalized and
depreciated over the estimated useful life. All other
non-regulatory drydocking expenditures and marine inspection
costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred.
Properties
Our principal executives operate from our leased headquarters
office in The Woodlands, Texas.
Our Subsea Services segment is supported from offices in
Haugesund, Norway. Our Subsea Trenching and Protection segment
is supported from offices in Darlington in the United Kingdom.
These segments support their overseas operations through leased
facilities in Aberdeen and Norwich in
133
the United Kingdom, Den Helder in the Netherlands, Ciudad del
Carmen in Mexico, Perth, Australia and Singapore.
Our North Sea towing and supply operations are supported from
leased offices in Aberdeen, Scotland. We lease offices in Lagos,
Nigeria that serve as our West Africa regional office supporting
all corporate functions with a technical support base in Port
Harcourt, Nigeria. We also have leased sales and operational
offices in Ciudad del Carmen, Mexico. Our Brazilian operations
are supported from an owned maintenance and administrative
facility in Macae, Brazil. The Southeast Asia / China
operations are supported by our leased offices in Singapore and
Shanghai, China.
Environmental and
Government Regulation
We must comply with extensive government regulation in the form
of international conventions, federal, state and local laws and
regulations in jurisdictions where our vessels operate
and/or are
registered. These conventions, laws and regulations govern
matters of environmental protection, worker health and safety,
vessel and port security, and the manning, construction and
operation of vessels. The International Maritime Organization,
or IMO, has made the regulations of the International Safety
Management Code, or ISM Code, mandatory. The ISM Code provides
an international standard for the safe management and operation
of ships, pollution prevention and certain crew and vessel
certifications which became effective on July 1, 2002. IMO
has also adopted the International Ship & Port
Facility Security Code, or ISPS Code, which became effective on
July 1, 2004. The ISPS Code provides that owners or
operators of certain vessels and facilities must provide
security and security plans for their vessels and facilities and
obtain appropriate certification of compliance.
As we operate vessels in the U.S., we are also subject to the
Shipping Act, 1916, as amended (1916 Act), and the
Merchant Marine Act, 1920, as amended (1920 Act, or
Jones Act and, together with the 1916 Act and
implementing of U.S. Government regulations,
(Shipping Acts), which govern, among other things,
the ownership and operation of vessels used to carry cargo
between U.S. ports. The Shipping Acts require that vessels
engaged in the U.S. coastwise trade and other services
generally be owned by U.S. citizens and built in the
U.S. For a corporation engaged in the U.S. coastwise
trade to be deemed a U.S. citizen: (i) the corporation
must be organized under the laws of the U.S. or of a state,
territory or possession thereof, (ii) each of the president
or other chief executive officer and the chairman of the board
of directors of such corporation must be a U.S. citizen,
(iii) no more than 25% of the directors of such corporation
necessary to the transaction of business can be
non-U.S. citizens
and (iv) at least 75% of the interest in such corporation
must be owned by U.S. citizens (as defined in
the Shipping Acts). The Jones Act also treats as a prohibited
controlling interest any (i) contract or
understanding by which more than 25% of the voting power in the
corporation may be exercised, directly or indirectly, in behalf
of a
non-U.S. citizen
and (ii) the existence of any other means by which control
of more than 25% of any interest in the corporation is given to
or permitted to be exercised by a
non-U.S. citizen.
Trico Marine Service, Inc.s charter contains provisions
that limit
non-U.S. citizen
ownership of its stock and the status of certain officers and
directors in the same manner as the Jones Act and authorizes
Trico Marine Services, Inc. and its Board of Directors to take
actions designed to effectuate the purpose of permitting Trico
to remain eligible to engage in the U.S. coastwise maritime
trade. Should Trico Marine Services, Inc. fail to comply with
the U.S. citizenship requirements of the Shipping Acts, it
would be prohibited from operating its vessels in the
U.S. coastwise trade during the period of such
non-compliance, and under certain circumstances would be deemed
to have undertaken an unapproved foreign transfer, resulting in
severe penalties, including permanent loss of
U.S. coastwide trading rights for our
U.S.-flag
vessels, fines or forfeiture of the vessels. Therefore the
various Shipping Acts impose requirements at both the company
and vessel levels.
Because of our interests outside the United States, we must
comply with United States laws and other foreign jurisdiction
laws related to pursuing, owing, and exploiting foreign
investments, agreements and other relationships. We are subject
to all such laws, including, but not limited to, the Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, or the FCPA, and similar
worldwide anti-bribery laws in
non-U.S. jurisdictions
which generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from
making improper payments to
non-U.S. officials
for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Our policies
134
mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws. We operate in
many parts of the world that have experienced governmental
corruption to some degree, and in certain circumstances strict
compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local
customs and practices. Despite our training and compliance
programs, our internal control policies and procedures may not
protect us from acts committed by our employees or agents.
We believe that we are in substantial compliance with currently
applicable laws and regulations. The risks of incurring
substantial compliance costs, liabilities and penalties for
non-compliance are inherent in offshore marine operations.
Compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and
regulations increases our cost of doing business. Additionally,
environmental, health and safety laws change frequently.
Therefore, we are unable to predict the future costs or other
future impact of these laws on our operations. There is no
assurance that we can avoid significant costs, liabilities and
penalties imposed as a result of governmental regulation in the
future.
Legal
Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in certain
personal injury, pollution and property damage claims and
related threatened or pending legal proceedings. Additionally,
from time to time, we are involved as both a plaintiff and a
defendant in other civil litigation, including contractual
disputes. We do not believe that any of these proceedings, if
adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect on
our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Additionally, certain claims would be covered under our
insurance policies. Our management, after review with legal
counsel and insurance representatives, is of the opinion these
claims and legal proceedings will be resolved within the limits
of our insurance coverage. At June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the Company accrued for liabilities in
the amount of approximately $3.4 million and
$2.3 million, respectively, based upon the gross amount
that management believes it may be responsible for paying in
connection with these matters. The amounts we will ultimately be
responsible for paying in connection with these matters could
differ materially from amounts accrued.
Insurance
The operation of our vessels is subject to various risks
representing threats to the safety of our crews and to the
safety of our vessels and cargo. We maintain insurance coverage
against risks such as catastrophic marine disaster, adverse
weather conditions, mechanical failure, crew negligence,
collision and navigation errors, all of which our management
considers to be customary in the industry. In addition, we
maintain insurance coverage against personal injuries to our
crew and third parties, as well as insurance coverage against
pollution and terrorist acts. We believe that our insurance
coverage is adequate and we have not experienced a loss in
excess of our policy limits. However, there can be no assurance
that we will be able to maintain adequate insurance at rates
that we consider commercially reasonable, nor can there be any
assurance that such coverage will be adequate to cover all
claims that may arise. Due to favorable loss history, and our
decision to elect higher retentions on certain policies, we are
enjoying lower overall premiums and greater flexibility in
managing our claims.
Employees
As of August 31, 2009, we had approximately
2,000 employees worldwide, including approximately 1,560
operating personnel and 440 divisional area, corporate,
administrative, technical, sales and management personnel. To
date, no strikes, work stoppages, boycotts, or slowdowns have
interrupted our operations.
None of our U.S. employees, which number approximately 130,
are represented by labor unions nor are they employed pursuant
to collective bargaining agreements or similar arrangements.
Our Norwegian and United Kingdom seamen work under union
contracts and our seamen in Brazil are covered by separate
collective bargaining agreements. We believe our relationship
with our employees is satisfactory.
Subordinated Intercompany Indebtedness
From time to time the Trico entities have intercompany loan balances.
This debt consisted of:
| Approximately $374.1 million owed by the Issuer to the Parent pursuant to that certain loan agreement dated May 15, 2008, which loan currently matures 30 days following demand by the Parent, subject to certain exceptions, and bears interest, payable quarterly at a rate of 3-month LIBOR +2.00% per annum. Any accrued and unpaid interest will be added to the principal amount of the loan each quarter and accrue interest. In the event the Issuer has insufficient funds available to make a payment under the loan agreement, or such payment would result in a default under other indebtedness of the Issuer, the Parent will not be entitled to demand repayment of the loan. | |
| Approximately $33.5 million owned by Trico Supply AS to Trico Marine Cayman, L.P., pursuant to that certain loan agreement dated as of November 8, 2007, as amended, which loan matures on December 31, 2017 and bears interest at a rate of 12-month LIBOR +2.00% per annum. Interest will accrue annual until the loan has been paid in full. | |
| Approximately $163.1 million owned by Trico Supply AS to Trico Marine Operators, Inc., a subsidiary of the Parent, pursuant to that certain promissory note dated November 8, 2007, as amended, which note matures on December 31, 2017 and bears interest, payable annually, at a rate of 12-month LIBOR +2.00% per annum. |
135