UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-55146

 

Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

630-218-8000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

There is no established public market for the registrant’s shares of common stock. As of March 17, 2021, there were 36,022,368 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

---

 

PART I

General

Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. (which we refer to herein as the “Company”, “we”, “our” or “us”) was incorporated on August 24, 2011 to acquire and manage a portfolio of commercial real estate investments located in the United States. We have primarily focused on acquiring retail properties and intend to target a portfolio of 100% grocery-anchored properties as described below.  We have invested in joint ventures and may continue to invest in additional joint ventures or acquire other real estate assets such as office and medical office buildings, multi-family properties and industrial/distribution and warehouse facilities if our management believes the expected returns from those investments exceed that of retail properties. We also may invest in real estate-related equity securities of both publicly traded and private real estate companies, as well as commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”). Our sponsor, Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation, referred to herein as our “Sponsor” or “IREIC,” is an indirect subsidiary of The Inland Group, LLC.  Various affiliates of our Sponsor provide services to us. We have no employees and are externally managed and advised by IREIT Business Manager & Advisor, Inc., referred to herein as our “Business Manager,” an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of our Sponsor. Our Business Manager is responsible for overseeing and managing our day-to-day operations.  Our properties are managed by Inland Commercial Real Estate Services LLC, referred to herein as our “Real Estate Manager,” an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of our Sponsor.

At December 31, 2020, we owned 44 retail properties, totaling 6.5 million square feet. A majority of our properties are multi-tenant, necessity-based retail shopping centers primarily located in major regional markets and growing secondary markets throughout the United States. At December 31, 2020, grocery-anchored or grocery shadow-anchored shopping center properties represented 86% of our annualized base rent. A grocery shadow-anchored shopping center is a shopping center near a grocery store that generates traffic for the shopping center but is not a part of the shopping center. At December 31, 2020, our portfolio had weighted average physical and economic occupancy of 92.8% and 93.3%, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, annualized base rent (“ABR”) per square foot averaged $18.00, $17.54 and $17.30, respectively, for all properties owned. ABR is calculated by annualizing the monthly base rent for leases in-place as of the applicable date, including the effect of any tenant concessions, such as rent abatement or allowances, which may have been granted and excluding ground leases. Annualized base rent including ground leases averaged $15.29, $15.08 and $14.94 as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

On February 11, 2019, the Company’s board of directors approved a strategic plan (the “Strategic Plan”) with the goals of providing future liquidity to investors and creating long-term stockholder value. The Strategic Plan centers around owning a portfolio of 100% grocery-anchored properties with lower exposure to big box retailers. Of the Company’s 682 leased spaces, there are 108 non-grocery big box (anchor spaces of at least 10,000 square feet), and six vacant big box spaces in the portfolio as of March 15, 2021. Consistent with the Strategic Plan, we sold 12 properties during the year ended December 31, 2019 for aggregate net proceeds of $14.9 million and sold three additional properties in January 2020 for aggregate net proceeds of approximately $37.2 million. We used the proceeds to pay down the revolving credit facility. We intend to draw on the revolving credit facility to redeploy the net proceeds from these sales to, among other things, purchase additional assets or redevelop select centers within the current portfolio in the future pursuant to our Strategic Plan. For discussions of these sales, see Note 4 – “Dispositions” included in our December 31, 2020 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15.

Our management team and our board are considering the opportunistic sale of other assets with the goal of redeploying capital into the acquisition of strategically located grocery-anchored centers, as well as the redevelopment of select centers within the current portfolio, but no such sales and redeployments are expected or likely to occur until the full effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are known and begin to subside. We plan to consider a liquidity event in the future, market conditions permitting, most likely through a listing on a public securities exchange.

The Strategic Plan may evolve or change over time. For example, we may decide to focus more on redeveloping existing properties relative to investing in new grocery-anchored centers, depending on such factors, including, but not limited to, market prices for our properties, availability of capital for redevelopment and construction costs. We may explore and undertake one or more redevelopments of big box spaces for other uses, such as self-storage. There is no assurance we will be able to successfully implement the Strategic Plan, including making strategic sales or purchases of properties or listing our common stock, and we have not sold or purchased any properties since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and expect that no liquidity event will occur before the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy and the retail commercial real estate market subside.

Distribution Reinvestment Plan

 

Through the distribution reinvestment plan (“DRP”), we provide stockholders with the option to purchase additional shares from us by automatically reinvesting distributions, subject to certain share ownership restrictions. We do not pay any selling commissions or a marketing contribution and due diligence expense allowance in connection with the DRP. The price per share for shares of common

1

---

stock purchased under the DRP is equal to the Estimated Per Share NAV unless and until the shares become listed for trading. On March 3, 2020, we reported an estimated per share NAV of $18.15 and on March 5, 2021, we reported a new Estimated Per Share NAV of $18.08.  In the future when our board decides to resume the payment of distributions, shares sold through the DRP will be issued at a price equal to $18.08 until we update the Estimated Per Share NAV in 2022.

To preserve cash for the payment of operating and other expenses, such as debt payments, our board of directors has suspended distributions and rescinded the first quarter distribution that was expected to be paid on June 1, 2020 to stockholders of record on May 29, 2020. Our board of directors has also suspended our DRP and share repurchase program until further notice. We have also delayed making non-essential capital improvements and other non-essential capital expenditures at our properties since the onset of the pandemic, where possible, to reduce expenses and preserve cash and expect to continue to delay non-essential capital expenditures until they become essential or until the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our tenants subside. These actions are being taken until there is better clarity on our tenants’ ability and willingness to pay rent and meet other lease obligations and, ultimately, the performance of our shopping centers. The suspension of the DRP was effective on June 6, 2020 and the suspension of the share repurchase program was effective on June 26, 2020. Any unfulfilled repurchase requests will automatically roll over for processing under the terms and conditions of the share repurchase program when we restart our plan, unless a stockholder withdraws the request for repurchase.

Distributions reinvested through the DRP were $4.5 million, $19.6 million and $19.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Share Repurchase Program

We adopted a share repurchase program (as amended, “SRP”) effective October 18, 2012, under which we are authorized to purchase shares from stockholders who purchased their shares from us or received their shares through a non-cash transfer and who have held their shares for at least one year. Purchases are in our sole discretion. In the case of repurchases made upon the death of a stockholder or qualifying disability (“Exceptional Repurchases”), the one year holding period does not apply. The SRP was amended and restated effective January 1, 2018 to change the processing of repurchase requests from a monthly to a quarterly basis to align with the move to quarterly distributions. On February 11, 2019, our board adopted a second amended and restated SRP, which became effective on March 21, 2019. On March 3, 2020, our board adopted a third amended and restated SRP (the “Third A&R SRP”), which became effective on April 10, 2020.

Due to the uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and the need to preserve cash for the payment of operating and other expenses, such as debt payments, in this environment, our board of directors has suspended our SRP until further notice. The suspension of the SRP was effective on June 26, 2020 and no shares were repurchased since such time, except as noted in Item 5. Any unfulfilled repurchase requests will automatically roll over for processing under the terms and conditions of the SRP when we restart the plan, unless a stockholder withdraws the request for repurchase.

Repurchases through the SRP were $0.1 million, $9.4 million and $22.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. At December 31, 2019, our liability related to the SRP was $2.3 million recorded in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. At December 31, 2020, we did not have an SRP liability due to the suspension of the SRP.

2

---

Segment Data

We currently view our real estate portfolio as one reportable segment in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  Accordingly, we did not report any other segment disclosure for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.  For information related to our business segment, reference is made to Note 12 – “Segment Reporting” which is included in our December 31, 2020 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15.

Tax Status

We elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes (“REIT”) under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Internal Revenue Code”), commencing with the tax year ended December 31, 2013. Commencing with such taxable year, we were organized and began operating in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and believe we have so qualified. As a result, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that is distributed to stockholders. A REIT is subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (subject to certain adjustments and excluding any net capital gain) to its stockholders. We will monitor the business and transactions that may potentially impact our REIT status. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, without the benefit of certain statutory relief provisions, we will be subject to federal and state income tax on our taxable income as a “C corporation.” Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income, property or net worth and federal income and excise taxes. The earnings of any taxable REIT subsidiaries generally will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax applicable to “C corporations.”

Competition

The commercial real estate market is highly competitive. We compete in all of our markets with other owners and operators of commercial properties. We compete based on a number of factors that include location, rental rates, security, suitability of the property’s design to tenants’ needs and the manner in which the property is operated and marketed. The number of competing properties in a particular market could have a material effect on a property’s occupancy levels, rental rates and operating expenses.

We are subject to significant competition in seeking real estate investments and tenants. We compete with many third parties engaged in real estate investment activities including other REITs, specialty finance companies, savings and loan associations, banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, mutual funds, institutional investors, investment banking firms, lenders, hedge funds, governmental bodies and other entities. Some of these competitors, including larger REITs, have substantially greater financial resources than we do and generally enjoy significant competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating efficiencies.

Human Capital

We do not have any employees. In addition, all of our executive officers are officers of IREIC or one or more of its affiliates and are compensated by those entities, in part, for their services rendered to us. We neither separately compensate our executive officers for their service as officers, nor do we reimburse either our Business Manager or Real Estate Manager for any compensation paid to individuals who also serve as our executive officers, or the executive officers of our Business Manager or its affiliates or our Real Estate Manager; provided that, for these purposes, the corporate secretaries of our Company and our Business Manager are not considered “executive officers.”

Regulations - General

Our investments are subject to various federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations, including, among other things, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, zoning regulations, land use controls, environmental controls relating to air and water quality, noise pollution and indirect environmental impacts such as increased motor vehicle activity. We believe that we have all permits and approvals necessary under current law to operate our investments.

Regulations - Environmental

As an owner of real estate, we are subject to various environmental laws of federal, state and local governments and foreign governments at various levels. Compliance with existing laws has not had a material adverse effect on our capital expenditures, competitive position, financial condition or results of operations, and management does not believe it will have such an impact in the future. We cannot predict the impact of unforeseen environmental contingencies or new or changed laws or regulations on properties in which we own an interest, or on properties that may be acquired directly or indirectly in the future. We do not believe that our existing portfolio as of December 31, 2020 will require us to incur material expenditures to comply with these laws and regulations.

3

---

Access to Company Information

We electronically file our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports with the SEC. The public may read and copy any of the reports that are filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Internet address located at www.sec.gov. The website contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.

We make available, free of charge, on our website, inland-investments.com/inland-income-trust, or by responding to requests addressed to our investor services group, the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports. These reports are available as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed or furnished to the SEC. We routinely post important information about us and our business, including financial and other information for investors, on our website. We encourage investors to visit our website from time to time, as information is updated and new information is posted.

Certifications

We have filed with the SEC the certifications required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which are attached as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

4

---

The factors described below represent our material risks. Other factors may exist that we do not consider material based on information that is currently available or that we are not currently able to anticipate. The occurrence of any of the risks discussed below could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

Summary of Risk Factors

Risks Related to Our Business

Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate

5

---

Risks Associated with Debt Financing

Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest

Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure

Federal Income Tax Risks

6

---

Risks Related to Our Business

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) continues to spread in various locations throughout the U.S., and its impacts are uncertain and hard to measure, but it has already had material adverse effects on our business, and these effects may continue and may worsen, depending in part on the speed and effectiveness of vaccinations, severity and duration of the pandemic in the U.S. and its immediate and lingering economic effects.

The continued spread of the COVID-19 pandemic globally has had, and could have a greater, material adverse effect on the global and U.S. economies as a whole, as well as the states and cities where we own properties in particular, leading to significant adverse impacts on economic activity as well as significant volatility and lack of liquidity in financial markets, including commercial lending markets.

A sustained downturn in the U.S. economy and reduced consumer spending, including reduced consumer activity at brick-and-mortar commercial establishments, due to the prolonged existence and threat of the COVID-19 pandemic has caused an economic recession in the U.S. that has negatively impacted, and could further impact, the ability and willingness of many of our tenants to pay their rent when due. Our ability to lease space and negotiate and maintain favorable rents is also likely to be negatively impacted by a prolonged recession in the U.S. economy, which would result in a decline in our occupancy percentage and reduction in rental revenues as tenants default and leases expire over time. An increase in the number of co-tenancy claims at Harris Plaza or other properties could result if the occupancy at those properties falls below required thresholds or large spaces, such as the Bed Bath & Beyond at Harris Plaza vacated at the end of January 2021, otherwise go dark, which may provide remaining tenants at such a property with certain rights that may include the right to cease operations or stop paying or abate (reduce) rent owed.

Because substantially all of our income is derived from rentals of commercial real property, our business, income, cash flow, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and ability to comply with the terms of, draw upon or increase the size of our Credit Facility, prospects and ability to service our debt obligations, our ability to consummate future property acquisitions and our ability to pay future distributions to our stockholders would be materially adversely affected if a significant number of tenants continue to be or become unable to meet their obligations to us. Also, there is no assurance that we will be able to refinance maturing debt on terms and conditions acceptable to us.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has been rapidly evolving and is ever-changing. The coronavirus outbreak is negatively impacting almost every industry directly or indirectly, particularly the travel, hotel and retail industries, and businesses that rely on or require close personal contact, such as theaters, live entertainment venues, gyms and exercise facilities, health and wellness service providers and beauty salons, restaurants and bars. Many of our tenants have been required by the local, state or federal authorities to cease or limit operations thereby preventing them from generating revenue. Our tenants rely on retail customers and many of their businesses require close personal contact. Even if not prevented by the local, state or federal authorities, concern regarding the transmission of COVID-19 has impacted, and will likely continue to impact, the willingness of persons to engage in in-person commerce which will likely further result in reductions in customer foot traffic and reduced demand for our tenants’ products and services and may diminish the demand for space and the corresponding amounts of rent we can obtain for our properties and harm our tenants’ ability or willingness to pay us rent.

As of March 15, 2021, many tenants continue to operate in a materially reduced capacity. As disclosed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission since the onset of the pandemic, we have been collecting less than all rent billed, and rent billed has not included amounts that we have agreed to defer. In addition, we have finalized payment plans with tenants totaling $8.1 million in total rent, or 8% of ABR. As of March 15, 2021, deferrals represent $5.9 million in total rent, or approximately 6% of ABR, and modifications and rent abatements represent $2.2 million in total rent, or 2% of ABR. Rent deferrals reduce our cash available to pay operating expenses and service our debt obligations. When the deferred rent becomes due, our tenants will be required to pay these deferred rent amounts in addition to the regular rent due, which may be difficult or impossible for tenants whose businesses have not recovered to pre-pandemic levels or are otherwise not performing well. Any rent forgiveness or additional deferrals would further reduce our available cash.

Enforcing our rights as landlord against tenants who fail to pay rent or otherwise do not comply with the terms of their leases may be costly and may consume valuable time and resources, and even if we obtain a judgment, tenants that have been severely impacted may not be able to pay us what we are owed. Our ability to recover amounts under the terms of our leases may further be restricted or delayed due to moratoriums imposed by various jurisdictions in light of the COVID-19 pandemic on landlord-initiated commercial eviction and collection actions. If any of our tenants, or any guarantor of a tenant’s lease obligations, files for bankruptcy, we could be further adversely affected due to loss of revenue but also because the bankruptcy may also make it more difficult for us to lease the remainder of the property or properties in which the bankrupt tenant operates. Even if co-tenancy rights do not exist at centers affected by anchor store closings, we may nevertheless be negatively affected because other tenants may experience downturns in their businesses that could further threaten their ongoing ability to continue paying rent and remain solvent. Further, certain of our tenants may not be eligible for or may not be successful in securing stimulus funds under government aid programs, if any, and there is no assurance they will pay rent even if they qualify.

7

---

As referenced above, a decrease in demand for in-person retail businesses has made and could continue to make it difficult for us to renew or re-lease our properties at lease rates equal to or above historical rates and we could incur significant re-leasing costs and the re-leasing process with respect to both anticipated and unanticipated vacancies could take longer. Leasing spreads for 2020 were only 2.0% for new leases and -1.8% for renewals. Some tenants that have been or are forced to close or have had their operations severely limited by government order or some other government action or whose customers and potential customers change their habits in light of the coronavirus, e.g., by shopping more online, may not re-open even after the aforementioned restrictions are lifted or may go out of business, which could have a material impact on occupancy at our properties and may continue to materially impact our results. To the extent that unemployment remains high and government assistance decreases significantly from recent levels, for example, if unemployment assistance provided by the U.S. government is decreased or discontinued, retail consumer spending may correspondingly decrease, and our tenants may be materially adversely affected and forced to close. Additionally, many manufacturers of goods and suppliers and processors of food in many countries have experienced complete or partial shut downs and may not be able to function at full capacity in an attempt to curb the spread of the illness, which could lead to temporary or long-term disruptions in supply chains and may also impact the operations of our tenants, further impacting their revenues and ability to pay rent when due.

The business and operating results of our tenants may also be negatively impacted if the outbreak of the coronavirus occurs within their respective workforces or otherwise disrupts their management and other personnel, their supply chains or their ability to operate their businesses. Many companies have implemented policies and procedures designed to protect against the introduction of the coronavirus to the workforce, including permitting or requiring personnel to work offsite, among others. These changes in the work processes of our tenants could lead to disruptions, such as a reduced ability to effectively transact with customers and colleagues and a loss of IT system functionality due to unusual or excess burdens on IT infrastructures.

We rely on the Business Manager to manage our day-to-day operations. Non-essential businesses were previously closed and are subject to limited operations in Illinois per the order of the Governor of Illinois, including our corporate headquarters in Oak Brook. Though many people are able to work remotely, the business and operations of our Business Manager and its affiliates may also be adversely impacted by the coronavirus outbreak, including illness or quarantine of members of its workforce, which may negatively impact its ability to provide us services to the same degree as it had prior to the outbreak and may adversely affect our financial reporting systems and internal controls and procedures and increase vulnerability to security breaches, information technology disruptions and other similar events.

The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic, or a future pandemic, impacts our operations and those of our tenants will depend on future developments, including the scope, severity and duration of the pandemic, the actions taken to contain the pandemic or mitigate its impact, and the direct and indirect economic effects of the pandemic and containment measures, among others, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence but could be material. The situation is ever-changing, and additional impacts to the business may arise that we are not aware of currently. The rapid development and fluidity of this situation precludes any reliable prediction as to the full adverse impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, but a prolonged outbreak (e.g., of new virus strains) despite the discovery and rollout of vaccines as well as continued efforts to mitigate the spread of the virus could continue to have a material impact on the cash rents that we are able to collect and would materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Many risk factors set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 should be interpreted as heightened risks as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including but not limited to risk factors related to the economy, competition (including e-commerce and online sales), leasing, debt financing, tenant bankruptcies, distributions, share repurchases, and anchor tenants. We have suspended distributions, distribution reinvestments under our DRP, and share repurchases under our share repurchase program, and we cannot provide any assurance as to when they will be restarted, if at all.

The Strategic Plan may evolve or change over time, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, and there is no assurance we will be able to successfully achieve our board’s objectives under the Strategic Plan, including making strategic sales or purchases of properties or listing our common stock, within the timeframe we expected or would prefer or at all.

We have incurred net losses on a basis in accordance with U.S. GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 and may incur such net losses in the future, which has had and could in the future continue to have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, operations, cash flow, and our ability to service our indebtedness and pay distributions to our stockholders.

We have incurred net losses on a U.S. GAAP basis for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 of $10.4 million, $11.4 million and $23.3 million, respectively.  Our losses can be attributed, in part, to non-cash expenses, such as depreciation and amortization, acquisition related expenses and impairment charges.

8

---

The amount and timing of distributions, if any, may vary, and payment of distributions have been suspended until further notice.  We have paid and may continue to pay distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations, including the proceeds of our DRP.

There are many factors that can affect the availability and timing of distributions paid to our stockholders. We may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to fund any distributions to our stockholders. The actual amount and timing of distributions, if any, is determined by our board of directors in its discretion, based on its analysis of our actual and expected cash flow, capital expenditures and investments, as well as general financial conditions. Actual cash available for distribution may vary substantially from estimates made by our board. The sale of assets and delayed reinvestment or reinvestment at lower yields will negatively impact the amount available to pay distributions. In addition, to the extent we invest in development or redevelopment projects that do not immediately generate cash flow, or in real estate assets that have significant capital requirements, our ability to make distributions will be negatively impacted. Our board will continue to review our distribution policy as our Strategic Plan evolves. In light of the uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and to preserve cash for the payment of operating and other expenses, such as debt payments, our board of directors rescinded the first quarter distribution that was expected to be paid on June 1, 2020 and has suspended the payment of distributions until further notice. There is no assurance we will be able to pay distributions in the future at any particular amount.

Historically, we have not consistently generated sufficient cash flow from operations to fund distribution payments. Our organizational documents permit us to pay distributions from sources other than cash flow from operations. Specifically, some or all of our distributions may be paid from retained cash flow (if any), borrowings, cash flow from investing activities, the net proceeds from the sale of our assets, or from the proceeds of our DRP. Accordingly, if we cannot generate sufficient cash flow from operations to fully fund distributions, some or all of our distributions may be paid from the other sources described above. We have not established any limit on the extent to which we may use such alternate sources.

Funding distributions from the proceeds of our DRP, borrowings or asset sales will result in us having fewer funds available to acquire properties or other real estate-related investments. Likewise, funding distributions from the sale of additional securities, including shares issued under the DRP, will dilute our stockholders interest in us on a percentage basis and may impact the value of the investment, especially if we sell these securities at prices less than the price our stockholders paid for their shares. As a result, the return our stockholders realize on their investment may be reduced. Doing so may also negatively impact our ability to generate cash flows. A decrease in the level of stockholder participation in the DRP could have an adverse impact on our ability to fund distributions and other operating and capital needs. There is no assurance we will continue to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to cover distributions. If these sources are not available or are not adequate, our board may have to consider reducing or eliminating distributions.

There is no established public trading market for our shares and our SRP has been suspended thus stockholders may not be able to sell their shares even if they wish to do so.

There is no established public trading market for our shares and no assurance that one may develop. This may inhibit the transferability of our shares.  Our charter does not require our directors to seek stockholder approval to liquidate our assets by a specified date, nor does our charter require our directors to list our shares for trading by a specified date.  There is no assurance the board will pursue a listing or other liquidity event at any time in the future.  In addition, even if our board decides to seek a listing of our shares of common stock, there is no assurance that we will satisfy the listing requirements or that our shares will be approved for listing. Even if our shares of common stock are approved for listing, we can provide no assurance regarding the price at which our shares may trade.  Thus, holders of our common stock should be prepared to hold their shares for an unlimited period of time. Our charter also prohibits the ownership of more than 9.8% in value of the aggregate of the outstanding shares of our stock or more than 9.8% (in value or number whichever is more restrictive) of the aggregate of the outstanding shares of our common stock by any single investor unless exempted by our board.  

Moreover, our SRP, which is currently suspended, contains numerous restrictions that limit our stockholders' ability to sell their shares even if the plan is reactivated. For example, because of funding limits, we have not been able to satisfy all properly submitted repurchase requests and, prior to suspension, satisfied these requests on a pro rata basis. Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may amend, suspend (in whole or in part), or terminate our SRP. The SRP will immediately terminate if our shares become listed for trading on a national securities exchange. Further, our board reserves the right in its sole discretion to change the repurchase prices or reject any requests for repurchases. Any amendments to, or suspension or termination of, the SRP may restrict or eliminate our stockholders’ ability to have us repurchase their shares and otherwise prevent our stockholders from liquidating their investment. Therefore, our stockholders may not have the opportunity to make a repurchase request prior to a potential termination of the SRP and our stockholders may not be able to sell any of their shares of common stock back to us. As a result of these restrictions and circumstances, the ability of our stockholders to sell their shares should they require liquidity is significantly restricted. Moreover, under the SRP, any shares accepted for “ordinary repurchases” or “exceptional repurchases” are repurchased at a discount to the then-current estimated per share NAV.

9

---

Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may amend, suspend (in whole or in part), or terminate our SRP. The SRP will immediately terminate if our shares become listed for trading on a national securities exchange. Further, our board reserves the right in its sole discretion to change the repurchase prices or reject any requests for repurchases. Any amendments to, or suspension or termination of, the SRP may restrict or eliminate our stockholders’ ability to have us repurchase their shares and otherwise prevent our stockholders from liquidating their investment. Therefore, our stockholders may not have the opportunity to make a repurchase request prior to a potential termination of the SRP and our stockholders may not be able to sell any of their shares of common stock back to us. As a result of these restrictions and circumstances, the ability of our stockholders to sell their shares should they require liquidity is significantly restricted. Moreover, under the SRP, any shares accepted for “ordinary repurchases” or “exceptional repurchases” are repurchased at a discount to the then-current estimated per share NAV. Therefore, even if our stockholders are able to sell their shares of common stock back to us pursuant to the SRP, they may be forced to do so at a discount to the purchase price such stockholders paid for their shares.

The Estimated Per Share NAV of our common stock is based on a number of assumptions and estimates that may not be accurate or complete and is also subject to a number of limitations.

On March 5, 2021, we announced an Estimated Per Share NAV of our common stock as of December 31, 2020 equal to $18.08 per share. To assist our board of directors in establishing the Estimated Per Share NAV, we engaged a third party specializing in providing real estate financial services. As with any methodology used to estimate value, the methodology employed by this third party was based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not have been accurate or complete. Further, different parties using different assumptions and estimates could have derived a different estimated per share net asset value, which could be significantly different from our Estimated Per Share NAV. The Estimated Per Share NAV will fluctuate over time and does not represent: (i) the price at which our shares would trade on a national securities exchange, (ii) the amount per share a stockholder would obtain if he, she or it tried to sell his, her or its shares, (iii) the amount per share stockholders would receive if we liquidated our assets and distributed the proceeds after paying all our expenses and liabilities or (iv) the price a third party would pay to acquire our Company.

There is also no assurance that the methodology used to estimate our value per share will be acceptable to broker dealers for customer account purposes or to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) or that the estimated value per share will satisfy the applicable annual valuation requirements under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), and the Internal Revenue Code with respect to employee benefit plans subject to ERISA and other retirement plans or accounts subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

Our charter authorizes us to issue additional shares of stock, which may reduce the percentage of our common stock owned by our other stockholders, subordinate stockholders’ rights or discourage a third party from acquiring us.

Existing stockholders do not have preemptive rights to purchase any shares issued by us in the future. Our charter authorizes us to issue up to 1,500,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 1,460,000,000 shares are classified as common stock and 40,000,000 shares are classified as preferred stock.  We may, in the sole discretion of our board and without approval of our common stockholders:

Future issuances of common stock will reduce the percentage of our outstanding shares owned by our other stockholders.  Further, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of stock with terms and conditions that could subordinate the rights of the holders of our current common stock, adversely affect the Estimated Per Share NAV or have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for our stockholders.

10

---

Market disruptions may adversely impact many aspects of our operating results and operating condition.

The availability of debt financing secured by commercial real estate is subject to underwriting standards that can be tightened in response to adverse changes in real estate or credit market conditions.  Further, interest rates may increase in response to changing economic conditions, which may negatively affect U.S. economic conditions as a whole, or real estate industry conditions such as:  

Our board of directors may change our investment policies without stockholder approval, which could alter the nature of our stockholders’ investment.

Our charter requires our independent directors to review our investment policies at least annually to determine that the policies we are following are in the best interest of our stockholders. These policies may change over time. The methods of implementing our investment policies may also vary, as new investment techniques are developed.  Our investment policies, including the Strategic Plan, the methods for implementing them, and our other objectives, policies and procedures may be altered by a majority of the directors (which must include a majority of the independent directors), without the approval of our stockholders.  As a result, the nature of our stockholders’ investment could change without their consent.  A change in our investment strategy may, among other things, increase our exposure to interest rate risk, default risk and commercial real property market fluctuations, all of which could materially adversely affect our ability to achieve our investment objectives.

We may not be able to successfully implement the Strategic Plan adopted by our board of directors on February 11, 2019.

As part of the Strategic Plan, we sold 12 properties during the year ended December 31, 2019 and three additional properties in January 2020. There is no assurance that we will be able to redeploy the proceeds from the properties sold to acquire suitable investments on financially attractive terms, if at all, or that we will be able to sell any additional assets at acceptable prices. We also expect to evaluate the redevelopment of certain of our assets as part of the Strategic Plan. As described herein, redeveloping assets presents additional uncertainties including, among other things, the cost to redevelop and the amount and timing of returns generated by redevelopment.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully implement the Strategic Plan or that the execution of the Strategic Plan will positively impact the value of our common stock. We have not sold or purchased any properties since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy and the retail commercial real estate market likely will continue to delay any material asset purchases or sales, and no liquidity event is likely until these adverse effects have subsided. The Strategic Plan may evolve or change over time, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, and there is no assurance we will be able to successfully achieve our board’s objectives under the Strategic Plan, including making strategic sales or purchases of properties or listing our common stock, within the timeframe we expected or would prefer or at all.

Development or redevelopments may expose us to additional risks.

As part of our Strategic Plan, we plan to further analyze and potentially pursue redevelopment of certain assets. Development and redevelopment activities are subject to a number of risks, including, but not limited to:

11

---

Further, during the period of time we are developing or redeveloping an asset or assets, our rental income from such properties may be reduced. Delays in completing development may also impact leases with existing tenants or our ability to secure new tenants. Occurrence of any of these events would likely have a material adverse effect on the estimated value of our common stock, our cash flow from operations, ability to pay distributions and ability to pursue a liquidity event for our stockholders. In addition, development costs for a project may increase, which may result in reduced returns, or even losses. In deciding whether to develop or redevelop a particular property, we make certain assumptions regarding the expected future performance of that property. If the property does not perform as expected, our financial performance may be materially and adversely affected, or an impairment charge could occur.

Competition with other non-traditional grocery retailers may reduce our profitability.

Tenants in the grocery industry face potentially changing consumer preferences and increasing competition from other forms of retailing, such as online grocery retailers and non-traditional grocery retailers such as prepared meal and fresh food delivery services, mass merchandisers, super-centers, warehouse club stores and drug stores. Other retail centers within the market area of our properties and meal and food delivery services both inside and outside these market areas compete with our properties for customers, affecting our tenants’ cash flows and thus affecting their ability to pay rent.

 

Actions of our joint venture partners could negatively impact our performance.

We have entered into, may continue to enter into, joint ventures with third parties. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of funds that we may invest in these joint ventures.  We intend to develop and acquire properties through joint ventures with other persons or entities when warranted by the circumstances. The venture partners may share certain approval rights over major decisions and these investments may involve risks not otherwise present with other methods of investment in real estate, including, but not limited to:

12

---

We rely on IREIC and its affiliates and subsidiaries to manage and conduct our operations. Any material adverse change in IREIC’s financial condition or our relationship with IREIC could have a material adverse effect on our business and ability to achieve our investment objectives.

We depend on IREIC and its affiliates and subsidiaries to manage and conduct our operations. IREIC, through one or more of its subsidiaries, owns and controls our Business Manager and Real Estate Manager.  IREIC has sponsored numerous public and private programs and through its affiliates or subsidiaries has provided offering, asset, property and other management and ancillary services to these entities. From time to time, IREIC or the applicable affiliate or subsidiary has waived or deferred fees or made capital contributions to support these public or private programs. IREIC or its applicable affiliates or subsidiaries may waive or defer fees or make capital contributions in the future. Further, IREIC and its affiliates or subsidiaries may from time to time be parties to litigation or other claims arising from sponsoring these entities or providing these services. As such, IREIC and these other entities may incur costs, liabilities or other expenses arising from litigation or claims that are either not reimbursable or not covered by insurance. Future waivers or deferrals of fees, additional capital contributions or costs, liabilities or other expenses arising from litigation or claims could have a material adverse effect on IREIC’s financial condition and ability to fund our Business Manager or Real Estate Manager to the extent necessary.

If we become self-managed by internalizing our management functions, we may be unable to retain key personnel, and our ability to achieve our investment objectives could be delayed or hindered, which could adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders and the value of their investments.

At some point in the future, we may consider becoming self-managed by internalizing the functions performed for us by our Business Manager. Even if we become self-managed, we may not be able to hire certain key employees of the Business Manager and its affiliates, even if we are allowed to offer them positions with our Company. Although we are generally restricted from soliciting these persons pursuant to certain provisions set forth in the business management agreement, during the one-year period after the Business Manager’s receipt of an internalization notice the Business Manager will permit us to solicit for hire the “key” employees of the Business Manager and its affiliates, including all of the persons serving as the executive officers of our Company or the Business Manager who do not also serve as directors or officers of any other IREIC-sponsored REITs. However, at any given moment, many or all of the executive officers of the Company and the Business Manager may also be serving as a director or officer of one or more other IREIC-sponsored REITs. Failure to hire or retain key personnel could result in increased costs and deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting. These deficiencies could cause us to incur additional costs and divert management’s attention from most effectively managing our investments, which could result in us being sued and incurring litigation-associated costs in connection with the internalization transaction.

If we seek to internalize our management functions other than as provided for under our business management agreement, we could incur greater costs and lose key personnel.

Our board may decide that we should pursue an internalization by hiring our own group of executives and other employees or entering into an agreement with a third party, such as a merger, instead of by transitioning the services performed by, and hiring the persons providing services for, our Business Manager. The costs that we would incur in this case are uncertain and may be substantial and we would lose the benefit of the experience of our Business Manager.

Further, if we seek to internalize the functions performed for us by our Real Estate Manager, the purchase price will be separately negotiated by our independent directors, or a committee thereof, and will not be subject to the transition procedures described in our business management agreement.

Our stockholders’ return on investment in our common stock may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

The Company is not registered, and does not intend to register itself or any of its subsidiaries, as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”).  If we become obligated to register the Company or any of its subsidiaries as an investment company, the registered entity would have to comply with regulation under the Investment Company Act with respect to capital structure (including the registered entity’s ability to use leverage), management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act) and portfolio composition, including disclosure requirements and restrictions with respect to diversification and industry concentration, and other matters.  Compliance with the Investment Company Act would limit our ability to make certain investments and require us to significantly restructure our operations and business plan.  The costs we would incur and the limitations that would be imposed on us as a result of such compliance and restructuring would negatively affect the value of our common stock, our ability to make distributions and the sustainability of our business and investment strategies.

We intend to conduct our operations, directly and through wholly or majority-owned subsidiaries, so that neither we nor our subsidiaries are registered or will be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.  Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act, in relevant part, defines an investment company as (i) any issuer that is, or holds itself out as

13

---

being, engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities, or (ii) any issuer that is engaged, or proposes to engage, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns, or proposes to acquire, “investment securities” having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis, which we refer to as the “40% test.”  The term “investment securities” generally includes all securities except government securities and securities of majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exemption from the definition of investment company under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act.  We believe we are not considered an investment company under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act because we do not engage primarily or hold ourselves out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities.  Rather, we and our subsidiaries are primarily engaged in the business of investing in real property.  We also conduct our operations and the operations of our subsidiaries in a manner designed so that we do not come within the definition of an investment company under Section 3(a)(1)(C) because less than 40% of the value of our adjusted total assets on an unconsolidated basis consist of “investment securities.”  This requirement limits the types of businesses in which we may engage through our subsidiaries.  Furthermore, the assets we and our subsidiaries may originate or acquire are limited by the provisions of the Investment Company Act and the rules and regulations promulgated under the Investment Company Act, which may adversely affect our business.  

If we or any of our wholly or majority-owned subsidiaries would ever inadvertently fall within one of the definitions of “investment company,” we intend to rely on the exemption from registration as an investment company pursuant to Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act, which is available for entities “primarily engaged” in the business of “purchasing or otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate.”  As reflected in no-action letters, the SEC staff's position on Section 3(c)(5)(C) generally requires that at least 55% of an entity’s assets comprise qualifying real estate assets and that at least 80% of its assets must comprise qualifying real estate assets and real estate-related assets under the Investment Company Act.  Specifically, we expect any of our subsidiaries relying on Section 3(c)(5)(C) to invest at least 55% of its assets in mortgage loans, certain mezzanine loans and other interests in real estate that constitute qualifying real estate assets in accordance with SEC staff guidance, and an additional 25% of its assets in other types of mortgages, securities of REITs and other real estate-related assets such as debt and equity securities of companies primarily engaged in real estate businesses and securities issued by pass-through entities of which substantially all of the assets consist of qualifying real estate assets and/or real estate-related assets.  The remaining 20% of the entity’s assets can consist of miscellaneous assets.  These criteria may limit what we buy, sell and hold.

We will classify our assets for purposes of Section 3(c)(5)(C) based in large measure upon no-action letters issued by the SEC staff and other interpretive guidance provided by the SEC and its staff or on our analysis of such guidance published with respect to other types of assets to determine which assets are qualifying real estate assets and real estate-related assets.  However, the SEC’s guidance was issued in accordance with factual situations that may be substantially different from the factual situations we may encounter.  No assurance can be given that the SEC will concur with how we classify our assets or the assets of our subsidiaries.  The SEC may in the future take a view different than or contrary to our analysis with respect to the types of assets we have determined to be qualifying real estate assets or real estate-related assets.  For example, on August 31, 2011 the SEC issued a concept release and request for comments regarding the Section 3(c)(5)(C) exemption (Release No. IC-29778) in which it contemplated the possibility of issuing new rules or providing new interpretations of the exemption that might, among other things, define the phrase “liens on and other interests in real estate” or consider sources of income in determining a company’s “primary business.”  To the extent that the SEC or its staff provides more specific or different guidance, we may be required to adjust our strategy accordingly. Any additional guidance from the SEC or its staff could provide additional flexibility to us, or it could further inhibit our ability to pursue the strategies we have chosen.  If we are required to re-classify our assets, we may no longer be in compliance with the exclusion from the definition of an “investment company” provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act.  There can be no assurance that the laws and regulations governing the Investment Company Act status of REITs, including the SEC or its staff providing more specific or different guidance regarding these exemptions, will not change in a manner that adversely affects our operations.

Certain of our subsidiaries may rely on the exemption provided by Section 3(c)(6) to the extent that they hold mortgage assets through majority-owned subsidiaries that rely on the exemption provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C).  The SEC staff has issued little interpretive guidance with respect to Section 3(c)(6) and any guidance published by the staff could require us to adjust our strategy accordingly.

A change in the value of any of our assets could cause us to fall within the definition of “investment company” and negatively affect our ability to be free from registration and regulation under the Investment Company Act.   To avoid being required to register the Company or any of its subsidiaries as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain.  Sales may be required during adverse market conditions, and we could be forced to accept a price below that which we would otherwise consider appropriate.  In addition, we may have to acquire additional income- or loss-generating assets that we might not otherwise have acquired or may have to forgo opportunities to acquire interests in companies that we would otherwise want to acquire and would be important to our investment strategy.  Furthermore, if the value of securities issued by our subsidiaries that are exempted from the definition of “investment company” by Sections 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act, together with any other investment securities we own, exceeds 40% of our adjusted total assets on an unconsolidated basis, or if one or more of such subsidiaries fail to maintain an exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act, we could, among other things, be required to substantially change

14

---

the manner in which we conduct our operations to avoid being required to register as an investment company, effect sales of our assets in a manner that, or at a time when, we would not otherwise choose to do so or register as an investment company.  Any of these activities could negatively affect the value of our common stock, our ability to make distributions and the sustainability of our business and investment strategies, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we were required to register the Company or any of its subsidiaries as an investment company but failed to do so, we or the applicable subsidiary would be prohibited from engaging in our or its business, and criminal and civil actions could be brought against us or the applicable subsidiary. In addition, our contracts would be unenforceable unless a court required enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.

Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate

There are inherent risks with real estate investments.

Investments in real estate assets are subject to varying degrees of risk. For example, an investment in real estate cannot generally be quickly sold, limiting our ability to promptly vary our portfolio in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions. Investments in real estate assets also are subject to adverse changes in general economic conditions which, for example, reduce the demand for rental space.

Among the factors that could impact our real estate assets and the value of an investment in us are:

In addition, periods of economic slowdown or recession, or declining demand for real estate, or the public perception that any of these events may occur, could result in a general decline in rents or increased defaults under existing leases.

Our real estate assets and other investments may be subject to impairment charges.

Periodically, including in connection with taking actions under our Strategic Plan and in connection with the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, we assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our real estate properties and other investments may be impaired. Under U.S. GAAP, a property’s value is impaired only if the estimate of the aggregate future cash flows to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property. The valuation and possible subsequent impairment of real estate properties and other investments is a significant estimate that can change based on our continuous process of analyzing each property and reviewing assumptions about inherently uncertain factors, as well as the economic condition of the property at a particular point in time. We are required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the value of our real estate properties and other investments.

Determining whether a property is impaired and, if impaired, the amount of write-down to fair value requires a significant amount of judgment by management and is based on the best information available to management at the time of evaluation. There can be no assurance that we will not take charges in the future related to the impairment of our assets. Because the Strategic Plan contemplates asset sales, we have recognized, and may continue to recognize, greater impairment charges than if we were to continue to hold and operate these properties. Any future impairment could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in

15

---

which the charge is taken. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized impairment charges totaling $4.4 million related to three investment properties held for sale as of December 31, 2019, each of which had a carrying value that exceeded their fair value less selling costs. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recognized impairment charges of $15.4 million related to our investment in Mainstreet Texas Development Fund, LLC (“Mainstreet JV”). For further information related to impairment provision, reference is made to Note 15 – “Fair Value Measurements” which is included in our December 31, 2020 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15.

E-commerce seems likely to continue to have an adverse impact on our tenants and our business.

The use of the internet by consumers to shop has grown during the COVID-19 pandemic and is expected to continue to expand relative to pre-pandemic levels. This increase in internet sales could result in a further downturn in the business of our current tenants in their “brick and mortar” locations and could affect the way future tenants lease space. While we devote considerable effort and resources to analyze and respond to tenant trends, preferences and consumer spending patterns, we cannot predict with certainty what future tenants will want, what future retail spaces will look like and how much revenue will be generated at traditional “brick and mortar” locations. If we are unable to anticipate and respond promptly to trends in the market, our occupancy levels and rental amounts and the value of our properties may decline.  

We face significant competition in the leasing market, which may decrease or prevent increases in the occupancy and rental rates of our properties.

As of December 31, 2020, we owned 44 properties located in 21 states. We compete with numerous developers, owners and operators of commercial properties, many of which own properties similar to, and in the same market areas as, our properties. If our competitors offer space at rental rates below current market rates, or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, for example, as a result of decreased demand for space caused by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on certain types of retail tenants, we may lose existing or potential tenants and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge in order to attract new tenants or retain existing tenants when their leases expire. To the extent we are unable to renew leases or re-let space as leases expire, it would result in decreased cash flow from tenants and reduce the income produced by our properties. Excessive vacancies (and related reduced shopper traffic) at one of our properties may hurt sales of other tenants at that property and may discourage them from renewing leases. Also, if our competitors develop additional properties in locations near our properties, there may be increased competition for creditworthy tenants, which may require us to make capital improvements to properties that we would not have otherwise made.

We depend on tenants for our revenue, and accordingly lease terminations, tenant default, and bankruptcies have adversely affected and could in the future adversely affect the income produced by our properties.

The success of our investments depends on the financial stability of our tenants. Certain economic conditions, such as the decreased demand for certain products or services or the inability to operate resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and measures taken to combat it, have adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect our tenants. For example, business failures and downsizings may contribute to reduced consumer demand for retail products and services which would impact tenants of our retail properties. In addition, our retail shopping center properties typically are anchored by large, nationally recognized tenants, any of which may experience a downturn in their business that may weaken significantly their financial condition. Further, mergers or consolidations among large retail establishments could result in the closure of existing stores or duplicate or geographically overlapping store locations, which could include tenants at our retail properties.

As a result of these factors, our tenants may delay lease commencements, decline to extend or renew their leases upon expiration, fail to make rental payments, or declare bankruptcy. Any of these actions could result in the termination of the tenants' leases, the expiration of existing leases without renewal, or the loss of rental income attributable to the terminated or expired leases. In the event of a tenant default or bankruptcy, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as a landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-leasing our property.

16

---

Our revenue is impacted by the success and economic viability of our anchor retail tenants, some of whom have been struggling to compete with internet retailers or have been significantly adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic or both. Our reliance on single or significant tenants in certain buildings may decrease our ability to lease vacated space and adversely affect the returns on our stockholders’ investment.

In the retail sector, a tenant occupying all or a large portion of the gross leasable area of a retail center, commonly referred to as an anchor tenant, may become insolvent, may suffer a downturn in business, or may decide not to renew its lease. For example, Stein Mart declared bankruptcy in 2020 and closed its anchor location at our shopping center in Newport News, Virginia. Any of the aforementioned events have resulted and could result again in a reduction or cessation in rental payments to us and would adversely affect our financial condition. A lease termination by an anchor tenant could result in lease terminations or reductions in rent by other tenants whose leases may permit cancellation or rent reduction if another tenant’s lease is terminated. For example, Bed Bath & Beyond vacated its anchor space at Harris Plaza upon the expiration of its lease on January 31, 2021. If we are unable to re-lease the Bed Bath & Beyond space in a relatively short amount of time, co-tenancy provisions in the leases of two other large tenants at the shopping center may result in those tenants paying us rent as a percentage of their gross sales that will be less rent than what they were paying us. Similarly, the leases of some anchor tenants may permit the anchor tenant to transfer its lease to another retailer. The transfer to a new anchor tenant could cause customer traffic in the retail center to decrease and thereby reduce the income generated by that retail center. A lease transfer to a new anchor tenant could also allow other tenants to make reduced rental payments or to terminate their leases in accordance with lease terms. In the event that we are unable to re-lease the vacated space to a new anchor tenant, we may incur additional expenses in order to remodel the space to be able to re-lease the space to more than one tenant.

More than a few of our retail tenants have declared bankruptcy recently, which has had adverse effects on our business, and these and future tenant bankruptcies may result in additional adverse effects.

Bankruptcy filings by our tenants or any guarantor of a tenant’s lease obligation can occur in the course of operations, and in recent years, a number of companies in the retail industry, including certain of our tenants, have declared bankruptcy. For example, six tenants representing 3.6% of ABR as of December 31, 2020, filed for bankruptcy protection since the beginning of 2020, and we continue to monitor all of our tenants for potential store closings or adverse financial issues. A bankruptcy filing of our tenants or any guarantor of a tenant’s lease obligations would bar all efforts to collect pre-bankruptcy debts from these entities or their properties, unless we receive an enabling order from the bankruptcy court.  Post-bankruptcy debts would be paid currently.  If a lease is assumed, all pre-bankruptcy balances owing under it must be paid in full. Leases have been rejected by some tenants in the past, and if a lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy in the future, we would only have a general unsecured claim for damages.  If a lease is rejected, it is unlikely we would receive any payments from the tenant because our claim is capped at the rent reserved under the lease, without acceleration, for the greater of one year or 15% of the remaining term of the lease, but not greater than three years, plus rent already due but unpaid.  This claim could be paid only if the funds were available, and then only in the same percentages as that realized on other unsecured claims.

A tenant or lease guarantor bankruptcy has delayed and could again delay efforts to collect past due balances under the relevant leases, and could ultimately preclude full collection of these sums.  A tenant or lease guarantor bankruptcy could cause a decrease or cessation of rental payments that would mean a reduction in our cash flow and the amount available for distributions to our stockholders.  In the event of a bankruptcy there can be no assurance that the tenant or its trustee will assume our lease.  If a given lease or guaranty of a lease is not assumed, our cash flow and the amounts available for distributions to our stockholders may be adversely affected.

Inflation may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Increases in the rate of inflation may adversely affect our net operating income from leases with stated rent increases or limits on the tenant’s obligation to pay its share of operating expenses, which could be lower than the increase in inflation at any given time.  Inflation could also have an adverse effect on consumer spending, which may impact our tenants’ sales and, with respect to those leases including percentage rent clauses, our average rents.

17

---

We may be restricted from re-leasing space at our retail properties.

Leases with retail tenants may contain provisions giving the particular tenant the exclusive right to sell particular types of merchandise or provide specific types of services within the particular retail center. These provisions may limit the number and types of prospective tenants interested in leasing space in a particular retail property.

We have entered into long-term leases with some of our retail tenants, and those leases may not result in fair value over time, which could adversely affect our revenues and ability to make distributions.

We have entered into long-term leases with some of our retail tenants. Long-term leases do not allow for significant changes in rental payments and do not expire in the near term. If we do not accurately judge the potential for increases in market rental rates when negotiating these long-term leases, significant increases in future property operating costs could result in receiving less than fair value from these leases. These circumstances would adversely affect our revenues and funds available for distribution.

Retail conditions may adversely affect our income.

A retail property’s revenues and value may be adversely affected by a number of factors, many of which apply to real estate investment generally, but which also include trends in the retail industry and perceptions by retailers or shoppers of the safety, convenience and attractiveness of the retail property. Our properties are located in public places, and any incidents of crime or violence, including acts of protest or terrorism, would result in a reduction of business traffic to tenant stores in our properties. Any such incidents may also expose us to civil liability. In addition, to the extent that the investing public has a negative perception of the retail sector, the value of our retail properties may be negatively impacted.

A number of our retail leases are based on tenant gross sales.  Under those leases, our revenue from tenants increases as the sales of our tenants increase.  Generally, retailers face declining revenues during downturns in the economy.  As a result, the portion of our revenue which may derive from percentage rent leases could be adversely affected by a general economic downturn.  

Acquiring or attempting to acquire multiple properties in a single transaction may adversely affect our operations.

From time to time, we have acquired multiple properties in a single transaction. Portfolio acquisitions typically are more complex and expensive than single property acquisitions, and the risk that a multiple-property acquisition does not close may be greater than in a single-property acquisition. Portfolio acquisitions may also result in us owning investments in geographically dispersed markets, placing additional demands on our Business Manager and Real Estate Manager in managing the properties in the portfolio. In addition, a seller may require that a group of properties be purchased as a package even though we may not want to purchase one or more properties in the portfolio. In these situations, if we are unable to identify another person or entity to acquire the unwanted properties, we may be required to operate or attempt to dispose of these properties.  We also may be required to accumulate a large amount of cash to fund such acquisitions. We would expect the returns that we earn on such cash to be less than the returns on real property.  Therefore, acquiring multiple properties in a single transaction may reduce the overall yield on our portfolio.

Short-term leases may expose us to the effects of declining market rent.

Some of our properties have short-term leases with tenants.  There is no assurance that we will be able to renew these leases as they expire or attract replacement tenants on comparable terms, if at all.  Therefore, the returns we earn on this type of investment may be more volatile than the returns generated by properties with longer term leases.

We do not own the land when we are the lessee under a ground lease, so properties that we operate pursuant to a ground lease are subject to unique risks.

We have and may continue to acquire long-term leaseholds commonly known as ground leases to operate properties that are on land owned by third parties. Although we have a right to use the property on land leased to us pursuant to a ground lease, we do not own the underlying land. Accordingly, we will have no economic interest in the land at the expiration of the ground lease and will not share in any increase in value of the land or the improvements once our ground lease ends. If we are found to be in breach of a ground lease, and that breach cannot be cured, we could lose our interest in the improvements and the right to operate the property. Further, because we do not own the underlying land, the lessor could take certain actions to disrupt our use of the property or our tenant’s operation of the property.

18

---

We may be unable to sell assets if or when we decide to do so.

Maintaining our REIT qualification and continuing to avoid registration under the Investment Company Act as well as many other factors, such as general economic conditions, the availability of financing, interest rates and the supply and demand for the particular asset type, may limit our ability to sell real estate assets. Many of these factors are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any real estate asset on favorable terms and conditions, if at all, or the length of time needed to sell an asset.

Sale leaseback transactions may be re-characterized in a manner unfavorable to us.

We may from time to time enter into a sale leaseback transaction where we purchase a property and then lease the property to the seller. The transaction may, however, be characterized as a financing instead of a sale in the case of the seller’s bankruptcy. In this case, we would not be treated as the owner of the property but rather as a creditor with no interest in the property itself. The seller may have the ability in a bankruptcy proceeding to restructure the financing by imposing new terms and conditions. The transaction also may be re-characterized as a joint venture. In this case, we would be treated as a joint venture with liability, under some circumstances, for debts incurred by the seller relating to the property.

Operating expenses may increase in the future and to the extent these increases cannot be passed on to our tenants, our cash flow and our operating results would decrease.

Operating expenses, such as expenses for fuel, utilities, labor, building materials and insurance, are not fixed and may fluctuate from time to time.  Unless specifically provided for in a lease, there is no guarantee that we will be able to pass increases on to our tenants. To the extent these increases cannot be passed on to our tenants, any increases would cause our cash flow and our operating results to decrease, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to pay or sustain distributions.

An increase in real estate taxes may decrease our income from properties.

Some local real property tax assessors may seek to reassess some of our properties as a result of our acquisition of the property. Generally, from time to time our property taxes will increase as property values or assessment rates change or for other reasons deemed relevant by the assessors.  In fact, property taxes may increase even if the value of the underlying property declines.  An increase in the assessed valuation of a property for real estate tax purposes will result in an increase in the related real estate taxes on that property. Although some tenant leases may permit us to pass through the tax increases to the tenants for payment, there is no assurance that renewal leases or future leases will be negotiated on the same basis. Increases not passed through to tenants will adversely affect our cash flow from operations and our ability to pay distributions.

Potential development and construction delays and resulting increased costs and risks may reduce cash flow from operations.

We have acquired, and may continue to acquire, unimproved real property or properties that are under development or construction. Investments in these properties are subject to the uncertainties generally associated with real estate development and construction, including those related to re-zoning land for development, environmental concerns of governmental entities or community groups and the developers’ ability to complete the property in conformity with plans, specifications, budgeted costs and timetables. If a developer fails to perform, we may resort to legal action to rescind the purchase or the construction contract or to compel performance. A developer’s performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond the developer’s control. Delays in completing construction could also give tenants the right to terminate leases. We may incur additional risks when we make periodic progress payments or other advances to developers before they complete construction. These and other factors can result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. In addition, we will be subject to lease-up risks associated with newly constructed projects. We also must rely on rental income and expense projections and estimates of the fair market value of property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a purchase price at the time we acquire the property. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property, and the return on our investment could suffer.

19

---

If we contract with a development company for newly developed property, our earnest money deposit made to the development company may not be fully refunded.

We may enter into one or more contracts, either directly or indirectly through joint ventures with third parties, to acquire real property from a development company that is engaged in construction and development of commercial real estate. We may be required to pay a substantial earnest money deposit at the time of contracting with a development entity. At the time of contracting and the payment of the earnest money deposit by us, the development company typically will have only a contract to acquire land, a development agreement to develop a building on the land and an agreement with one or more tenants to lease all or part of the property upon its completion. If the development company fails to develop the property or all or a specified portion of the pre-leased tenants fail to take possession under their leases for any reason, we may not be able to obtain a refund of our earnest money deposit.

We may obtain only limited warranties when we purchase a property and therefore have only limited recourse in the event our due diligence did not identify any issues that lower the value of our property.

We have acquired, and may continue to acquire, properties in “as is” condition on a “where is” basis and “with all faults,” without any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular use or purpose. In addition, purchase agreements may contain only limited warranties, representations and indemnifications that will only survive for a limited period after the closing. The purchase of properties with limited warranties increases the risk that we may lose some or all of our invested capital in the property, as well as the loss of rental income from that property.

Uninsured losses or premiums for insurance coverage may adversely affect our returns.

The nature of the activities at certain properties may expose us and our tenants or operators to potential liability for personal injuries and, in certain instances, property damage claims. In addition, there are types of losses, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution or environmental matters that are uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. Insurance risks associated with potential terrorist acts or increasingly severe weather could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims.  These policies may or may not be available at a reasonable cost, if at all, which could inhibit our ability to finance or refinance our properties. In such instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. We cannot provide any assurance that we will have adequate coverage for these losses. In the event that any of our properties incurs a casualty loss that is not fully covered by insurance, the value of the particular asset will likely be reduced by the uninsured loss. In addition, we cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to fund any uninsured losses.

The costs of complying with environmental laws and other governmental laws and regulations may adversely affect us.

All real property and the operations conducted on real property are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. These laws and regulations generally govern wastewater discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous materials, and the remediation of contamination associated with disposals. We also are required to comply with various local, state and federal fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations.  Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on tenants, owners or operators for the costs of investigating or remediating contaminated properties.  These laws and regulations often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of the hazardous or toxic substances.  The cost of removing or remediating could be substantial.  In addition, the presence of these substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent a property or to use the property as collateral for borrowing.

Environmental laws and regulations also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures by us.  Environmental laws and regulations provide for sanctions in the event of noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties.  Third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances.  Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretations of existing laws may require material expenditures by us.  For example, various federal, regional and state laws and regulations have been implemented or are under consideration to mitigate the effects of climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions.  Among other things, “green” building codes may seek to reduce emissions through the imposition of standards for design, construction materials, water and energy usage and efficiency, and waste management.  These requirements could increase the costs of maintaining or improving our existing properties or developing new properties.

20

---

We may acquire properties in regions that are particularly susceptible to natural disasters, which may make us susceptible to the effects of these natural disasters in those areas from adverse climate developments or other causes.

Our properties are located in certain geographical areas that may be impacted by adverse events such as hurricanes, floods, wildfires, earthquakes, blizzards or other natural disasters, which could cause a loss of revenues at our real estate properties.  In addition, according to some experts, global climate change could result in heightened severe weather, thus further impacting these geographical areas.  Natural disasters in these areas may cause damage to our properties beyond the scope of our insurance coverage, thus requiring us to make substantial expenditures to repair these properties and resulting in a loss of revenues from these properties.  Any properties located near either coast will be exposed to more severe weather than properties located inland.  These losses may not be insured or insurable at an acceptable cost.  Elements such as water, wind, hail, fire damage and humidity in these areas can increase or accelerate wear on the properties’ weatherproofing and mechanical, electrical and other systems, and cause mold issues over time. As a result, we may incur additional operating costs and expenditures for capital improvements at properties in these areas.

Our properties may contain or develop harmful mold, which could lead to liability for adverse health effects and costs of remediating the problem.

The presence of mold at any of our properties could require us to undertake a costly program to remediate, contain or remove the mold. Mold growth may occur when moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Concern about indoor exposure to mold has been increasing because exposure to mold may cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. The presence of mold could expose us to liability from our tenants, their employees and others if property damage or health concerns arise.

We may incur significant costs to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act or similar laws.

Our properties generally are subject to the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, which we refer to as the Disabilities Act. Under the Disabilities Act, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The Disabilities Act has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services be made accessible and available to people with disabilities.

The requirements of the Disabilities Act could require removal of access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties or, in some cases, an award of damages. We attempt to acquire properties that comply with the Disabilities Act or place the burden on the seller or other third party, such as a tenant, to ensure compliance with these laws. However, we cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to acquire properties or allocate responsibilities in this manner. We may incur significant costs to comply with these laws.

Risks Associated with Investments in Securities

Through owning real estate-related equity securities, we will be subject to the risks impacting each entity’s assets.

We may invest in real estate-related securities. Equity securities are always unsecured and subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. Investments in real estate-related equity securities are subject to the risks associated with investing directly in real estate assets and numerous additional risks including: (1) limited liquidity in the secondary trading market in the case of unlisted or thinly traded securities; (2) substantial market price volatility resulting from, among other things, changes in prevailing interest rates in the overall market or related to a specific issuer, as well as changing investor perceptions of the market as a whole, REIT or real estate securities in particular or the specific issuer in question; (3) subordination to the liabilities of the issuer; (4) the possibility that earnings of the issuer may be insufficient to meet its debt service obligations or to pay distributions; and (5) with respect to investments in real estate-related preferred equity securities, the operation of mandatory sinking fund or call/redemption provisions during periods of declining interest rates that could cause the issuer to redeem the securities. In addition, investments in real estate-related securities involve special risks relating to the particular issuer of the securities, including the financial condition and business outlook of the issuer. Investing in real estate-related securities will expose our results of operations and financial condition to the factors impacting the trading prices of publicly-traded entities.

21

---

Investments in CMBS are subject to all of the risks of the underlying mortgage loans and the risks of the securitization process.

CMBS are securities that evidence interests in, or are secured by, a single commercial mortgage loan or a pool of commercial mortgage loans. Accordingly, these securities are subject to all of the risks of the underlying mortgage loans. In a changing interest rate environment, the value of CMBS may be adversely affected when payments on underlying mortgages do not occur as anticipated, resulting in the extension of the security’s effective maturity and the related increase in interest rate sensitivity of a longer-term instrument. The value of CMBS may also change due to shifts in the market’s perception of issuers and regulatory or tax changes adversely affecting the mortgage securities market as a whole. In addition, CMBS are subject to the credit risk associated with the performance of the underlying mortgage properties. In certain instances, third-party guarantees or other forms of credit support designed to reduce credit risk may not be effective due, for example, to defaults by third party guarantors.

CMBS are also subject to several risks created through the securitization process. Generally, CMBS are issued in classes or tranches. To the extent that we invest in a subordinate class or tranche, we will be paid interest only to the extent that there are funds available after paying the senior class. To the extent the collateral pool includes delinquent loans, subordinate classes will likely not be fully paid. Subordinate CMBS are also subject to greater credit risk than those CMBS that are more highly rated. Further, the ratings assigned to any particular class of CMBS may prove to be inaccurate. Thus, any particular class of CMBS may be riskier and more volatile than the rating may suggest, all of which may cause the returns on any CMBS investment to be less than anticipated.

Risks Associated with Debt Financing

The financial covenants under our credit agreement may restrict our ability to make distributions and our operating and acquisition activities. If we breach the financial covenants we could be held in default under the credit agreement, which could accelerate our repayment date and materially adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition.

We entered into a credit agreement, as amended, for a $350.0 million credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) consisting of a revolving credit facility providing initial revolving credit commitments in an aggregate amount of $200.0 million (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and a term loan facility providing initial term loan commitments in an aggregate amount of $150.0 million (the “Term Loan”).  The credit agreement provides us with the ability from time to time to increase the size of the Credit Facility, subject to certain conditions. Our performance of the obligations under the credit agreement, including the payment of any outstanding indebtedness, is secured by a minimum pool of ten unencumbered properties with an unencumbered pool value of $200.0 million or above and by a guaranty by certain of our subsidiaries. At March 15, 2021, we had $259 million outstanding of the $350 million available under the Credit Facility. Our maximum availability under the Credit Facility was $91 million as of March 15, 2021, subject to the terms and conditions, including compliance with the covenants, of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement that governs the Credit Facility. Although $91 million is the maximum available, covenant limitations, particularly the leverage ratio, affect what we can actually draw or otherwise undertake as additional debt. Our leverage ratio generally cannot exceed 60%, provided however that two times during the term of our Revolving Credit Facility our leverage ratio may be 62.5% for two consecutive quarters. As of December 31, 2020, our leverage ratio as defined in the credit agreement was 55.5%. There has been substantially less available to actually draw or undertake as additional debt during the pandemic than the maximum amount available, and there may be additional periods during which the amount we can actually draw or otherwise undertake as additional debt is considerably less than the maximum amount available, particularly while the COVID-19 pandemic continues to negatively affect our tenants.

The credit agreement requires compliance with certain financial covenants, including, among other conditions, a Consolidated Tangible Net Worth requirement, restrictions on indebtedness, a distribution limitation and other material covenants. Compliance with these covenants could inhibit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and to pursue certain business initiatives or effect certain transactions that might otherwise be beneficial to us. For example, without lender consent, we may not declare and pay distributions or honor any redemption requests during the period of the waiver of our Consolidated Tangible Net Worth covenant and after this waiver if any default under the agreement then exists or if distributions, excluding any distributions reinvested through our DRP, for the then-current quarter and the three immediately preceding quarters would exceed 95% of our Funds from Operations, or “FFO,” excluding acquisition expenses, or “adjusted FFO,” for that period.

The credit agreement provides for several customary events of default, including, among other things, the failure to comply with our covenants under the credit agreement, such as the Consolidated Tangible Net Worth covenant, and the failure to pay when amounts outstanding under the credit agreement become due or defaulting by us or our subsidiaries in the payment of an amount due under, or in the performance of any term, provision or condition contained in, any agreement providing for another debt arrangement, such as a mortgage, beyond certain dollar thresholds specified in our Credit Facility. Due to the level of operations of our tenants as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we negotiated a waiver of compliance with the Consolidated Tangible Net Worth covenant for three quarters ending on March 31, 2021. The future effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our tenants are difficult to predict, and if the pandemic has negative effects on our tenants beyond what we are expecting, or our properties do not otherwise perform as well as we are expecting or there are more tenant bankruptcies than we are expecting, we may need to request another waiver to avoid a breach of the Consolidated Tangible Net Worth covenant and a default under the credit agreement. Tenant bankruptcies negatively impact our compliance with the Consolidated Tangible Net Worth covenant even if the tenant continues to pay rent. There is no guarantee that our lenders under the credit

22

---

agreement will grant another waiver. Defaults under the credit agreement could restrict our ability to borrow additional monies and could cause all amounts to become immediately due and payable, which would materially adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition.

Volatility in the financial markets and challenging economic conditions could adversely affect our ability to secure debt financing on attractive terms and our ability to service any future indebtedness that we may incur.

We have funded our capital needs almost exclusively through cash flow from operations (to the extent positive) and through the commercial debt markets. The domestic and international commercial real estate debt markets have been volatile resulting in, from time to time, the tightening of underwriting standards by lenders and credit rating agencies, which limits the availability of credit and increase costs for what is available. The recent coronavirus outbreak has also adversely affected credit and capital market conditions resulting in varying degrees of volatility, a tightening of credit standards and a lessening of credit availability. This may impact our ability to access capital on favorable terms, in a timely manner, or at all, which could make obtaining funding for our capital needs, such as future acquisitions. If the overall cost of borrowing increases, either by increases in the index rates or by increases in lender spreads, the increased costs may result in existing or future acquisitions generating lower overall economic returns and potentially reducing future cash flow available to us. If disruptions in the debt markets occur, our ability to borrow monies to finance the purchase of, or other activities related to, real estate assets will be negatively impacted. In addition, we may find it difficult, costly or impossible to refinance indebtedness which is maturing. If we are unable to borrow monies on terms and conditions that we find acceptable, the return on our properties may be lower.

Further, economic conditions could negatively impact commercial real estate fundamentals and result in lower occupancy, lower rental rates and declining values in our real estate portfolio and in the collateral securing any loan investments we may make.

Borrowings may reduce the funds available for distribution and increase the risk of loss since defaults may cause us to lose the properties securing the loans and may result in defaults under other agreements, including our Credit Facility.

We have acquired properties by either borrowing monies or, in some instances, by assuming existing financing.  We typically borrow money to finance a portion of the purchase price of assets we acquire.  In some instances, we have acquired properties by borrowing monies in an amount equal to the purchase price of the acquired properties. We may also borrow money for other purposes to, among other things, satisfy the requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our “REIT annual taxable income,” subject to certain adjustments and excluding any net capital gain, or as is otherwise necessary or advisable to assure that we continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Over the long term, however, payments required on any amounts we borrow reduce the funds available for, among other things, acquisitions, capital expenditures for existing properties or distributions to our stockholders because cash otherwise available for these purposes is used to pay principal and interest on this debt.

If there is a shortfall between the cash flow from a property and the cash flow needed to service mortgage debt secured by a property, then the amount of cash flow from operations available for distributions to stockholders will be reduced. Many of the  mortgages on our properties contain provisions which under certain circumstances require that cash received from tenants be paid into a cash maintenance escrow account or a lockbox or other account controlled by the lender, for example, when the borrower is not in compliance with certain covenants in the mortgage. As of March 15, 2021, cash received from tenants at two properties, Regal Court and Marketplace at Tech Center, was required to be paid into this type of account pursuant to provisions in those mortgages triggered by tenant bankruptcies, vacancies or failures to pay rent at these properties. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In such a case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, thus reducing the value of our stockholders’ investment. For federal income tax purposes, a foreclosure is treated as a sale of the property or properties for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the property or properties. If the outstanding balance of the debt exceeds our tax basis in the property or properties, we would recognize taxable gain on the foreclosure action and we would not receive any cash proceeds. In this event, we may be unable to pay the amount of distributions required in order to maintain our REIT status. We also may fully or partially guarantee any monies that subsidiaries borrow to purchase or operate properties. In these cases, we will likely be responsible to the lender for repaying the loans if the subsidiary is unable to do so. Our Credit Facility contains a cross-default provision that could be triggered if certain defaults by our subsidiary borrowers were to occur under their mortgages, and mortgages themselves could contain cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, so the Company or more than one property may be materially adversely affected by a mortgage default.

If we are unable to borrow at favorable rates, we may not be able to acquire new properties.

If we are unable to borrow money at favorable rates, we may be unable to acquire additional real estate assets or refinance existing loans at maturity. Further, we have obtained and may continue to enter into loan agreements or other credit arrangements that require us to pay interest on amounts we borrow at variable or “adjustable” rates. Increases in interest rates will increase our interest costs. If interest rates are higher when we refinance our loans, our expenses will increase and we may not be able to pass on this added cost in the form of increased rents, thereby reducing our cash flow and the amount available for distribution to our stockholders.  Further,

23

---

during periods of rising interest rates, we may be forced to sell one or more of our properties in order to repay existing loans, which may not permit us to maximize the return on the particular properties being sold. At December 31, 2020, we had $65.7 million or 10.4% of our total debt that bore interest at variable rates and not fixed by swap agreements with a weighted average interest rate equal to 2.15%. We had variable rate debt subject to swap agreements fixing the rate of $401.6 million or 63.6% of our total debt at December 31, 2020.

Interest-only indebtedness may increase our risk of default and ultimately may reduce our funds available for distribution to our stockholders.

We have obtained, and may continue to enter into, mortgage indebtedness that does not require us to pay principal for all or a portion of the life of the debt instrument. During the period when no principal payments are required, the amount of each scheduled payment is less than that of a traditional amortizing mortgage loan. The principal balance of the mortgage loan is not reduced (except in the case of prepayments) because there are no scheduled monthly payments of principal required during this period. After the interest-only period, we may be required either to make scheduled payments of principal and interest or to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at or prior to maturity. These required principal or balloon payments will increase the amount of our scheduled payments and may increase our risk of default under the related mortgage loan if we do not have funds available or are unable to refinance the obligation.

Investing in subordinated debt involves greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by the same properties.

 

We have invested in, and may continue to invest in, mezzanine debt and other subordinated debt. These types of investments carry a higher degree of risk of loss than senior secured debt investments because in the event of default and foreclosure, holders of senior liens will be paid in full before subordinated investors and, depending on the value of the underlying collateral, there may not be sufficient assets to pay all or any part of amounts owed to subordinated investors. Moreover, mezzanine debt and other subordinated debt investments may have higher loan-to-value ratios than conventional senior lien financing, resulting in less equity in the collateral and increasing the risk of loss of principal. If a borrower defaults or declares bankruptcy, we may be subject to agreements restricting or eliminating our rights as a creditor, including rights to call a default, foreclose on collateral, accelerate maturity or control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings. In addition, senior lenders may limit the amount or timing of interest and principal payments while the senior secured debt is outstanding.

We may acquire or finance properties with lock-out provisions, which may prohibit us from selling a property, or may require us to maintain specified debt levels for a period of years on some properties.

The terms and conditions contained in certain of our loan documents preclude us from pre-paying the principal amount of the loan or could restrict us from selling or otherwise disposing of or refinancing properties. For example, lock-out provisions prohibit us from reducing the outstanding indebtedness secured by certain of our properties, refinancing this indebtedness on a non-recourse basis at maturity, or increasing the amount of indebtedness secured by our properties. Lock-out provisions could impair our ability to take other actions during the lock-out period. In particular, lock-out provisions could preclude us from participating in major transactions that could result in a disposition of our assets or a change in control even though that disposition or change in control might be in the best interests of our stockholders.

Increasing interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect our ability to pay distributions. We may also be adversely affected by uncertainty surrounding LIBOR.

At December 31, 2020, we had $63.7 million of debt or 10.4% of our total debt bearing interest at variable rates indexed to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and not fixed by a swap with a weighted average interest rate equal to 2.15% per annum. We had variable rate debt indexed to LIBOR and subject to swap agreements fixing the rate of $401.6 million or 63.6% of our total debt at December 31, 2020. If interest rates on all debt which bears interest at variable rates as of December 31, 2020 increased by 1% (100 basis points), the increase in interest expense on all debt would decrease earnings and cash flows by $0.6 million annually. If interest rates on all debt which bears interest at variable rates as of December 31, 2020 decreased by 1% (100 basis points), interest expense would not change earnings and cash flows primarily due to the impact of the LIBOR floor on the Revolving Credit Facility.

In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority, the authority which regulates LIBOR, announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York organized the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, which identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as its preferred alternative to LIBOR in derivatives and other financial contracts. Subsequently, in November 2020, the Intercontinental Exchange (“ICE”) Benchmark Administration Limited (“IBA”), the administrator of LIBOR, announced that it would consult on its intention to cease the publication of the one-week and two-month USD LIBOR settings immediately following December 31, 2021 and the remaining USD LIBOR settings immediately following the LIBOR publication on June 30, 2023. We are not able to predict when LIBOR may be limited or discontinued or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR market. We are monitoring and evaluating the risks related

24

---

to potential changes in LIBOR availability, which include potential changes in interest paid on debt and amounts received and paid on interest rate swaps. In addition, the value of debt or derivative instruments tied to LIBOR could also be impacted when LIBOR is limited or discontinued, and contracts must be transitioned to a new alternative rate. In some instances, transitioning to an alternative rate may require negotiation with lenders and other counterparties and could present challenges. The consequences of these developments cannot be entirely predicted and could include an increase in the cost of our variable rate debt.

While we expect LIBOR to be available in substantially its current form until the end of 2021, it is possible that LIBOR will become unavailable prior to that time. This could occur, for example, if a sufficient number of banks decline to make submissions to the LIBOR administrator. In that case, the risks associated with the transition to an alternative reference rate would be accelerated or magnified. Any of these events, as well as the other uncertainty surrounding the transition to LIBOR, could adversely affect us.

To hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we may use derivative financial instruments that may be costly and ineffective.

From time to time, we have used, and may continue to use, derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates on loans secured by our assets. Derivative instruments may include interest rate swap contracts, interest rate cap or floor contracts, futures or forward contracts, options or repurchase agreements. Our actual hedging decisions will be determined in light of the facts and circumstances existing at the time of the hedge and may differ from our current hedging strategy.  There is no assurance that our hedging strategy will achieve our objectives.  We may be subject to costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs, if we terminate these arrangements.

We use derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate fluctuations and are exposed to credit risk, basis risk and legal enforceability risks. In this context, credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. Basis risk occurs when the index upon which the contract is based is more or less variable than the index upon which the hedged asset or liability is based, thereby making the hedge less effective. Finally, legal enforceability risks encompass general contractual risks including the risk that the counterparty will breach the terms of, or fail to perform its obligations under, the derivative contract, increasing the risk that we may not realize the benefits of these instruments.  There is a risk that counterparties could fail, shut down, file for bankruptcy or be unable to pay out contracts. The failure of a counterparty that holds collateral that we post in connection with an interest rate swap agreement could result in the loss of that collateral.

We may be contractually obligated to purchase property even if we are unable to secure financing for the acquisition.

We expect to finance a portion of the purchase price for each property that we acquire. However, to ensure that our offers are as competitive as possible, we do not expect to enter into contracts to purchase property that include financing contingencies. Thus, we may be contractually obligated to purchase a property even if we are unable to secure financing for the acquisition. In this event, we may choose to close on the property by using cash on hand, which would result in less cash available for our operations and distributions to stockholders. Alternatively, we may choose not to close on the acquisition of the property and default on the purchase contract. If we default on any purchase contract, we could lose our earnest money and become subject to liquidated or other contractual damages and remedies.

The total amount we may borrow is limited by our charter.

We may borrow up to 300% of our net assets, equivalent to 75% of the cost of our assets. We may exceed this limit only if our board of directors (including a majority of our independent directors) determines that a higher level is appropriate. This limit could adversely affect our business, including:

Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest

IREIC may face a conflict of interest in allocating personnel and resources between its affiliates, our Business Manager and our Real Estate Manager.

We do not have any employees.  We rely on persons performing services for our Business Manager and Real Estate Manager and their affiliates to manage our day-to-day operations. Some of these persons also provide services to one or more investment programs

25

---

currently or previously sponsored by IREIC. These individuals face competing demands for their time and service, and are required to allocate their time between our business and assets and the business and assets of IREIC, its affiliates and the other programs formed and organized by IREIC.  Certain of these individuals have fiduciary duties to both us and our stockholders.  If these persons are unable to devote sufficient time or resources to our business due to the competing demands of the other programs, they may violate their fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders, which could harm our business and cause us to be unable to maintain or increase the value of our assets, and our operating cash flows and ability to pay distributions could be adversely affected.

In addition, if another investment program sponsored by IREIC decides to internalize its management functions in the future, it may do so by hiring and retaining certain of the persons currently performing services for our Business Manager and Real Estate Manager, and if it did so, it would not allow these persons to perform services for us.

We do not have arm’s-length agreements with our Business Manager, our Real Estate Manager or any other affiliates of IREIC.

The agreements and arrangements with our Business Manager, our Real Estate Manager and any other affiliates of IREIC were not negotiated at arm’s-length.  These agreements may contain terms and conditions that are not in our best interest or would not be present if we entered into arm’s-length agreements with third parties.

Our Business Manager, our Real Estate Manager and other affiliates of IREIC face conflicts of interest caused by their compensation arrangements with us, which could result in actions that are not in the long-term best interests of our stockholders.

We pay fees, which may be significant, to our Business Manager, Real Estate Manager and other affiliates of IREIC for services provided to us.  Our Business Manager receives fees based on the aggregate book value, including acquired intangibles, of our invested assets. Further, our Real Estate Manager receives fees based on the gross income from properties under management and may also receive leasing and construction management fees.  Other parties related to, or affiliated with, our Business Manager or Real Estate Manager may also receive fees or cost reimbursements from us.  These compensation arrangements may cause these entities to take or not take certain actions.  For example, these arrangements may provide an incentive for our Business Manager to: (1) borrow more money than prudent to increase the amount we can invest; or (2) retain instead of sell assets, even if our stockholders may be better served by a sale or other disposition of the assets.  The interests of these parties in receiving fees may conflict with the interest of our stockholders in earning income on their investment in our common stock.

We rely on entities affiliated with IREIC to identify real estate assets.

We rely on the real estate professionals employed by IREA and other affiliates of our Sponsor to source potential investments in properties, real estate-related assets and other investments in which we may be interested. Our Sponsor and its affiliates maintain an investment committee (“Investment Committee”) that reviews each potential investment and determines whether an investment is acceptable for acquisition. In determining whether an investment is suitable, the Investment Committee considers investment objectives, portfolio and criteria of all programs currently advised by our Sponsor or its affiliates (collectively referred to as the “Programs”). Other factors considered by the Investment Committee may include cash flow, the effect of the acquisition on portfolio diversification, the estimated income or unrelated business tax effects of the purchase, policies relating to leverage, regulatory restrictions and the capital available for investment. Our Business Manager will not recommend any investments for us unless the investment is approved for consideration in advance by the Investment Committee. Once an investment has been approved for consideration by the Investment Committee, the Programs are advised and provided an opportunity to elect to acquire the investment. If more than one Program is interested in acquiring an investment, then the Program that has had the longest period of time elapse since it was allocated and invested in a contested investment is awarded the investment by the allocation committee. We may not, therefore, be able to acquire properties that we otherwise would be interested in acquiring.

Our properties may compete with the properties owned by other programs sponsored by IREIC or IPCC.

Certain programs sponsored by IREIC or Inland Private Capital Corporation (“IPCC”) own and manage the type of properties that we own or seek to acquire, including in the same geographical areas. Therefore, our properties, especially those located in the same geographical area, may compete for tenants or purchasers with other properties owned and managed by other IREIC- or IPCC-sponsored programs. Persons performing services for our Real Estate Manager may face conflicts of interest when evaluating tenant leasing opportunities for our properties and other properties owned and managed by IREIC- or IPCC-sponsored programs, and these conflicts of interest may have an adverse impact on our ability to attract and retain tenants.  In addition, a conflict could arise in connection with the resale of properties in the event that we and another IREIC- or IPCC-sponsored program were to attempt to sell similar properties at the same time, including in particular in the event another IREIC- or IPCC-sponsored program engages in a liquidity event at approximately the same time as us, thus impacting our ability to sell the property or complete a proposed liquidity event.

26

---

Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure

Our rights, and the rights of our stockholders, to recover claims against our officers, directors, Business Manager and Real Estate Manager are limited.

Under our charter, no director or officer will be liable to us or to any stockholder for money damages to the extent that Maryland law permits the limitation of the liability of directors and officers of a corporation.  We may generally indemnify our directors, officers, employees, if any, Business Manager, Real Estate Manager and their respective affiliates for any losses or liabilities suffered by any of them as long as: (1) the directors have determined in good faith that the course of conduct that caused the loss or liability was in our best interest; (2) these persons or entities were acting on our behalf or performing services for us; (3) the loss or liability was not the result of the negligence or misconduct of the directors (gross negligence or willful misconduct with respect to the independent directors), officers, employees, Business Manager, Real Estate Manager or their respective affiliates; and (4) the indemnity or agreement to hold harmless is recoverable only out of our net assets and not from our stockholders.  As a result, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors, officers and employees, our Business Manager, the Real Estate Manager and their respective affiliates, than might otherwise exist under common law.  In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our directors, officers and employees or our Business Manager and the Real Estate Manager and their respective affiliates in some cases.

Our board of directors may, in the future, adopt certain measures under Maryland law without stockholder approval that may have the effect of making it less likely that a stockholder would receive a “control premium” for his or her shares.

Corporations organized under Maryland law with a class of registered securities and at least three independent directors are permitted to protect themselves from unsolicited proposals or offers to acquire the company by electing to be subject, by a charter or bylaw provision or a board of directors resolution and notwithstanding any contrary charter or bylaw provision, to any or all of five provisions:

These provisions may discourage an extraordinary transaction, such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, all of which might provide a premium price for stockholders’ shares.  Our charter does not prohibit our board from opting into any of the above provisions.

Further, under the Maryland Business Combination Act, we may not engage in any merger or other business combination with an “interested stockholder” or any affiliate of that interested stockholder for a period of five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder. After the five-year period ends, any merger or other business combination with the interested stockholder must be recommended by our board of directors and approved by the affirmative vote of at least:

Our directors have adopted a resolution exempting any business combination involving us and The Inland Group or any affiliate of The Inland Group, including our Business Manager and Real Estate Manager, from the provisions of this law.

Our charter places limits on the amount of common stock that any person may own without the prior approval of our board of directors.

No more than 50% of the outstanding shares of our common stock may be beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of each taxable year (other than the first taxable year for which an election to be a REIT has

27

---

been made). Our charter prohibits any persons or groups from owning more than 9.8% in value of our outstanding stock or more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our outstanding common stock without the prior approval of our board of directors. These provisions may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets that might involve a premium price for holders of our common stock. Further, any person or group attempting to purchase shares exceeding these limits could be compelled to sell the additional shares and, as a result, to forfeit the benefits of owning the additional shares.

Federal Income Tax Risks

If we fail to remain qualified as a REIT, our operations and distributions to stockholders will be adversely affected.

We elected to be taxed as a REIT, commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2013 and intend to operate in a manner that would allow us to continue to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, we may terminate our REIT qualification, if our board of directors determines that not qualifying as a REIT is in the best interests of our stockholders, or inadvertently. Our qualification as a REIT depends upon our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. We have structured and intend to continue structuring our activities in a manner designed to satisfy all the requirements for qualification as a REIT. However, the REIT qualification requirements are extremely complex and interpretation of the U.S. federal income tax laws governing qualification as a REIT is limited. Furthermore, any opinion of our counsel, including tax counsel, as to our eligibility to remain qualified as a REIT is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and is not a guarantee that we will continue to qualify as a REIT. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that we will be successful in operating so we can remain qualified as a REIT. Our ability to satisfy the asset tests depends on our analysis of the characterization and fair market values of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to a precise determination, and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals. Our compliance with the REIT income or quarterly asset requirements also depends on our ability to successfully manage the composition of our income and assets on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, if certain of our operations were to be recharacterized by the IRS, such recharacterization would jeopardize our ability to satisfy all requirements for qualification as a REIT. Furthermore, future legislative, judicial or administrative changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws could be applied retroactively, which could result in our disqualification as a REIT.

If we were to fail to remain qualified as a REIT, without the benefit of certain statutory relief provisions, in any taxable year:

In addition, if we were to fail to qualify as a REIT, we would not be required to pay distributions to stockholders, and all distributions to stockholders that we did pay would be subject to tax as regular corporate dividends to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits.  This means that our U.S. stockholders who are taxed as individuals generally would be taxed on our dividends at capital gains rates and that our corporate stockholders would be entitled to the dividends received deduction with respect to such dividends, subject, in each case, to applicable limitations under the Internal Revenue Code.

28

---

In certain circumstances, we may be subject to federal, state and local income taxes as a REIT, which would reduce our cash available to pay distributions.

Even as a REIT, we may be subject to federal, state and local income taxes. For example, if we have net income from a “prohibited transaction,” we will incur taxes equal to the full amount of the net income from the prohibited transaction. We may not be able to make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes applicable to REITs. We also may decide to retain income we earn from the sale or other disposition of our property and pay income tax directly on this income. In that event, our stockholders would be treated as if they earned that income and paid the tax on it directly. However, stockholders that are tax-exempt, such as charities or qualified pension plans, would have to file income tax returns to receive a refund of the income tax paid on their behalf. We also may be subject to state and local taxes on our income, property or net worth, either directly or at the level of the other companies through which we indirectly own our assets. Any taxes we pay directly or indirectly will reduce our cash available to pay distributions.

The taxation of distributions to our stockholders can be complex; however, distributions that we make to our stockholders generally will be taxable as ordinary income.

Distributions that we make to our taxable stockholders out of current and accumulated earnings and profits (and not designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income) generally will be taxable as ordinary income. Noncorporate stockholders are entitled to a 20% deduction with respect to these ordinary REIT dividends which would result in a maximum effective federal income tax rate of 29.6% (or 33.4% including the 3.8% surtax on net investment income); however, the 20% deduction will end after December 31, 2025. However, a portion of our distributions may: (1) be designated by us as capital gain dividends generally taxable as long-term capital gain to the extent that they are attributable to net capital gain recognized by us; (2) be designated by us as qualified dividend income, taxable at capital gains rates, generally to the extent they are attributable to dividends we receive from any taxable REIT subsidiaries or certain other taxable “C corporations” in which we own shares of stock; or (3) constitute a return of capital generally to the extent that they exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A return of capital is not taxable but has the effect of reducing the tax basis of a stockholder’s investment in our common stock.  Distributions that exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits and a stockholder’s tax basis in our common stock generally will be taxable as capital gain.

To maintain our REIT status, we must meet annual distribution requirements, which may force us to forgo otherwise attractive opportunities or borrow funds during unfavorable market conditions. This could delay or hinder our ability to meet our investment objectives and reduce our stockholders’ overall return.

To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute to our stockholders each year at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain. We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our undistributed REIT taxable income and net capital gain and to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions we make with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (a) 85% of our ordinary income, (b) 95% of our capital gain net income and (c) 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. At times, we may not have sufficient funds to satisfy these distribution requirements and may need to borrow funds or sell assets to fund these distributions, maintain our REIT status and avoid the payment of income and excise taxes.

Certain of our business activities are potentially subject to the prohibited transaction tax.

Our ability to dispose of property during the first two years following acquisition is restricted to a substantial extent as a result of our REIT status. Under applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code regarding prohibited transactions by REITs, while we qualify as a REIT and provided we do not meet a safe harbor available under the Internal Revenue Code, we will be subject to a 100% penalty tax on the net income from the sale or other disposition of any property (other than foreclosure property) that we own, directly or indirectly through any subsidiary entity, but generally excluding taxable REIT subsidiaries, that is deemed to be inventory or property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business. Whether property is inventory or otherwise held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business depends on the particular facts and circumstances surrounding each property. We intend to avoid the 100% prohibited transaction tax by (1) conducting activities that may otherwise be considered prohibited transactions through a taxable REIT subsidiary (but such taxable REIT subsidiary will incur corporate rate income taxes with respect to any income or gain recognized by it), (2) conducting our operations in such a manner so that no sale or other disposition of an asset we own, directly or indirectly through any subsidiary, will be treated as a prohibited transaction or (3) structuring certain dispositions of our properties to comply with the requirements of the prohibited transaction safe harbor available under the Internal Revenue Code for properties that, among other requirements, have been held for at least two years. Despite our present intention, no assurance can be given that any particular property we own, directly or indirectly through any subsidiary entity, but generally excluding taxable REIT subsidiaries, will not be treated as inventory or property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business. 

29

---

Complying with the REIT requirements may force us to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

To continue to qualify as a REIT, we must ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, certain government securities and qualified real estate assets, including shares of stock in other REITs, certain mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than securities that qualify for the 75% asset test and securities of qualified REIT subsidiaries and taxable REIT subsidiaries) generally cannot exceed 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer, 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer, or 5% of the value of our assets as to any one issuer.  In addition, no more than 25% of the value of our total assets may be securities (other than securities that qualify for the 75% asset test and securities of qualified REIT subsidiaries), no more than 20% of the value of our total assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries and no more than 25% of our assets may be represented by publicly offered REIT debt instruments that do not otherwise qualify under the 75% asset test. In order to meet these tests, we may be required to forego investments we might otherwise make. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our performance.

If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within thirty days after the end of the calendar quarter, or otherwise qualify to cure the failure under a relief provision, to avoid losing our REIT status and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively.

The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code may limit our ability to hedge the risks inherent to our operations. Under current law, any income that we generate from derivatives or other transactions intended to hedge risk of interest rate changes, price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made, or to be made, to acquire or carry real estate assets or in certain cases to hedge previously acquired hedges entered into to manage risks associated with property that has been disposed of or liabilities that have been extinguished, if properly identified under applicable Treasury Regulations, generally will not constitute gross income for purposes of the 75% and 95% income requirements applicable to REITs. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions will likely be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of both of the gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may need to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a taxable REIT subsidiary. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because taxable REIT subsidiaries would be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to bear. In addition, losses in a taxable REIT subsidiary generally will not provide any tax benefit, except for being carried forward against future taxable income of such taxable REIT subsidiary.

Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect investors.

Changes to the tax laws may occur, and any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets. Our stockholders are urged to consult with an independent tax advisor with respect to the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our shares. 

Although REITs generally receive more favorable tax treatment than entities taxed as “C corporations,” it is possible that future legislation would result in a REIT having fewer tax advantages, and it could become more advantageous for a company that invests in real estate to elect to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a “C corporation.” As a result, our charter provides our board of directors with the power, under certain circumstances, to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election and cause us to be taxed as a “C corporation,” without the vote of our stockholders. Our board of directors has fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders and could only cause such changes in our tax treatment if it determines in good faith that such changes are in the best interest of our stockholders.

30

---

Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends.

Currently, the maximum tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income payable to U.S. stockholders that are individuals, trusts and estates is 23.8%, including the 3.8% surtax on net investment income. Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for this reduced rate and, as described above, through December 31, 2025, will be subject to an effective rate of 33.4%, including the 3.8% surtax on net investment income. Although this does not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends payable by REITs, the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who are individuals, trusts and estates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including our shares. Tax rates could be changed in future legislation.

General Risks

Our stockholders may have tax liability on distributions that they elect to reinvest in our common stock.

If our stockholders participate in our DRP, they will be deemed to have received, and for income tax purposes will be taxed on, the fair market value of the share of our common stock that they receive in lieu of cash distributions. As a result, unless a stockholder is a tax-exempt entity, it will have to use funds from other sources to pay its tax liability.

Maryland law limits, in some cases, the ability of a third party to vote shares acquired in a “control share acquisition.”

The Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act provides that “control shares” of a Maryland corporation acquired in a “control share acquisition” have no voting rights except to the extent approved by stockholders by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares of stock owned by the acquirer, by officers of the acquirer or by employees who are directors of the acquirer, are excluded from shares entitled to vote on the matter. “Control shares” are voting shares of stock which, if aggregated with all other shares of stock owned by the acquirer or in respect of which the acquirer can exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquirer to exercise voting power in electing directors within specified ranges of voting power. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder approval. A “control share acquisition” means the acquisition of issued and outstanding control shares. The control share acquisition statute does not apply: (1) to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the Maryland corporation is a party to the transaction; or (2) to acquisitions approved or exempted by the charter or bylaws of the Maryland corporation. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the Control Share Acquisition Act any and all acquisitions of our stock by any person. There can be no assurance that this provision will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future.

The occurrence of cyber incidents, or a deficiency in our cybersecurity, could negatively impact our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, and/or damage to our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.

A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of our information resources. More specifically, a cyber incident is an intentional attack or an unintentional event that can include gaining unauthorized access to systems to disrupt operations, corrupt data, or steal confidential information. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our systems, both internal and those we have outsourced. Our three primary risks that could directly result from the occurrence of a cyber incident include operational interruption, damage to our relationship with our tenants, and private data exposure. We have implemented processes, procedures and controls to help mitigate these risks, but these measures, as well as our increased awareness of a risk of a cyber incident, do not guarantee that our financial results will not be negatively impacted by such an incident.

A failure of our Business Manager’s information technology (IT) infrastructure could adversely impact our business and operations.

We rely upon the capacity, reliability and security of our Business Manager’s information technology infrastructure and its ability to expand and continually update this infrastructure in response to changing needs of our business. Our Business Manager faces the challenge of supporting older systems and hardware and implementing necessary upgrades to its IT infrastructure.  Our Business Manager may not be able to successfully implement these upgrades in an effective manner, which could adversely affect our operations.  In addition, our Business Manager may incur significant increases in costs and extensive delays in the implementation and rollout of any upgrades or new systems.  If there are technological impediments, unforeseen complications, errors or breakdowns in implementation, the disruptions could have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

31

---

If our Business Manager or Real Estate Manager lose or are unable to obtain key personnel, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be hindered.

Our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of certain of our executive officers and other key personnel of our Business Manager and Real Estate Manager.  Neither we nor our Business Manager or Real Estate Manager has employment agreements with these persons, and we cannot guarantee that all, or any particular one, will continue to be available to provide services to us. If any of the key personnel of our Business Manager or Real Estate Manager were to cease their employment or other relationship with our Business Manager or Real Estate Manager, respectively, our results and ability to pursue our business plan could suffer.  Further, we do not intend to separately maintain “key person” life insurance that would provide us with proceeds in the event of death or disability of these persons. We believe our future success depends, in part, upon the ability of our Business Manager and Real Estate Manager to hire and retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot assure our stockholders that our Business Manager or Real Estate Manager will be successful in attracting and retaining skilled personnel. If our Business Manager or Real Estate Manager lose or are unable to obtain the services of key personnel, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered, and the value of our stockholders’ investment could decline.

The failure of any bank in which we deposit our funds could reduce the amount of cash we have available to fund our capital and operating needs and distributions.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or “FDIC,” generally only insures limited amounts per depositor per insured bank.  The FDIC insures up to $250,000 per depositor per insured bank account.  At December 31, 2020, we had cash and cash equivalents exceeding these federally insured levels.  If any of the banking institutions in which we have deposited funds ultimately fail, we may lose our deposits over the federally insured levels.  The loss of our deposits would reduce the amount of cash we have available to fund our capital and operating needs and distributions.

An economic downturn could have an adverse impact on the retail industry generally. Slow or negative growth in the retail industry could result in defaults by retail tenants which could have an adverse impact on our financial operations.

An economic downturn could have an adverse impact on the real estate industry generally.  As a result, the retail industry could face reductions in sales revenues and increased bankruptcies. The continuation of adverse economic conditions may result in an increase in distressed or bankrupt retail companies, which in turn would result in an increase in defaults by tenants at our commercial properties. Additionally, slow economic growth is likely to hinder new entrants into the retail market which may make it difficult for us to fully lease space at our retail properties or retail properties we plan to acquire. Tenant defaults and decreased demand for retail space would have an adverse impact on the value of our retail properties and any additional retail properties we acquire and our results of operations.

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war may affect the markets in which we operate our operations and our profitability.

We may acquire properties located in areas that are susceptible to attack. These attacks may directly impact the value of our assets through damage, destruction, loss or increased security costs. Although we may obtain terrorism insurance, we may not be able to obtain sufficient coverage to fund any losses we may incur. Risks associated with potential acts of terrorism could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Further, certain losses resulting from these types of events are uninsurable or not insurable at reasonable costs.

32

---

More generally, any terrorist attack, other act of violence or war, including armed conflicts, could result in increased volatility in, or damage to, the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy.

None.

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per square foot amounts)

The table below presents a summary of our investment properties as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.

 

 

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, ABR per square foot averaged $18.00 and $17.54, respectively, for all properties owned. ABR is calculated by annualizing the monthly base rent for leases in-place as of the applicable date, including any tenant concessions, such as rent abatement or allowances, which may have been granted and excluding ground leases. ABR per square foot including ground leases averaged $15.29 and $15.08, as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” below for detail on the amount of rent billed and collected during the pandemic.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold 12 properties and recognized a gain of $3,279 included in gain on sale of investment properties on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. During January 2020, we completed the sale of 3 additional properties.

33

---

The table below presents information for each of our investment properties as of December 31, 2020.

 

 

34

---

Tenancy Highlights

The following table presents information regarding the top ten tenants in our portfolio based on annualized base rent for leases in-place as of December 31, 2020.

 

 

The following table sets forth a summary of our tenant diversity for our entire portfolio and is based on leases in-place at December 31, 2020.

 

 

 

The following table sets forth a summary of our property type based on annualized base rent in-place for leases as of December 31, 2020.

 

 

35

---

The following table sets forth a summary, as of December 31, 2020, of the percent of total annualized base rent and the weighted average lease expiration by size of tenant.

 

Lease Expirations

The following table sets forth a summary, as of December 31, 2020, of lease expirations scheduled to occur during each of the calendar years from 2021 to 2030 and thereafter, assuming no exercise of renewal options or early termination rights for leases commenced on or prior to December 31, 2020. Annualized base rent represents the rent in place for the applicable property at December 31, 2020. The table below includes ground leases. If ground leases are excluded, annualized base rent would equal $82,694, or $18.00 per square foot for total expiring leases.

 

 

We are not a party to, and none of our properties are subject to, any material pending legal proceedings.

Not applicable.

 

36

---

PART II

Market Information

There is no established public trading market for our shares of common stock. Our board will determine when, and if, to apply to have our shares of common stock listed for trading on a national securities exchange, subject to satisfying existing listing requirements. Pursuant to a Strategic Plan adopted by our board on February 11, 2019, we plan to consider a liquidity event in the future, market conditions permitting, most likely through a listing on a national securities exchange. However, there is no assurance that we will list our shares. Further, there is no assurance that stockholders will be able to sell their shares at a time or price acceptable to them. We publish an estimated per share value of our common stock to assist broker dealers that sold our common stock in the Offering to comply with the rules published by FINRA.  On March 5, 2021, our board established an Estimated Per Share NAV of our common stock as of December 31, 2020 equal to $18.08 per share. The previously established estimated per share NAV of our common stock as of December 31, 2019 was equal to $18.15 per share. For additional information on the determination of our Estimated Per Share NAV, please see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2021.

As of March 17, 2021, we had 16,497 stockholders of record.

Distributions

We currently pay distributions on a quarterly basis. However, the actual amount and timing of distributions, if any, is determined by our board of directors in its discretion, based on its analysis of our actual and expected cash flow, capital expenditures and investments, as well as general financial conditions.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we declared a first quarter distribution in an amount equal to $0.226875, which represents an annualized rate of 5% based on the estimated per share NAV as of December 31, 2019 of $18.15, payable in arrears the following quarter. During the second quarter, our Board rescinded this distribution and suspended distributions. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we declared quarterly distributions in an amount equal to $0.3018 per share, which represents an annualized rate of 6% based on the estimated per share NAV as of December 31, 2018 of $20.12, payable in arrears the following quarter. We do not currently expect to resume paying distributions until the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the surrounding uncertainty have subsided, but we will continue to monitor the pandemic and its effects and expected effects on our tenants and the business in general in the hopes of being able to resume paying distributions on quarterly basis in the future as was our practice prior to the pandemic.

The following table shows the sources for the payment of distributions to common stockholders for the periods indicated (Dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

37

---

The following table compares cumulative distributions paid to cumulative net loss (in accordance with U.S. GAAP) for the period from August 24, 2011 (date of inception) through December 31, 2020 (Dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

Share Repurchase Program

We adopted the SRP effective October 18, 2012, under which we are authorized to purchase shares from stockholders who purchased their shares from us or received their shares through a non-cash transfer and who have held their shares for at least one year. Purchases are in our sole discretion. In the case of Exceptional Repurchases, the one year holding period does not apply. The SRP was amended and restated effective January 1, 2018 to change the processing of repurchase requests from a monthly to a quarterly basis to align with the move to quarterly distributions. On February 11, 2019, our board adopted a second amended and restated SRP, which became effective on March 21, 2019. On March 3, 2020, our board adopted the Third A&R SRP, which became effective on April 10, 2020.

Under the Third A&R SRP, we are authorized to make ordinary repurchases and Exceptional Repurchases at a price equal to 80.0% of the “share price,” which is defined in the Third A&R SRP as an amount equal to the lesser of: (A) $25, as adjusted under certain circumstances, including, among other things, if the applicable shares were purchased from the Company at a discounted price; or (B) the most recently disclosed estimated value per share. Prior to the amendment, we were authorized to make Exceptional Repurchases at a price equal to 100% of the “share price.” Beginning with repurchases in April 2021 if the SRP is resumed, the “share price” would be equal to $18.08 per share until we announce a new Estimated Per Share NAV. Accordingly, ordinary repurchases and Exceptional Repurchases would be at $14.46 per share.

The Third A&R SRP provides our board of directors with the discretion to reduce the funding limit for share repurchases. The Third A&R SRP limits the dollar amount for any repurchases made by us each calendar quarter to an amount equal to a percentage determined in the sole discretion of our board on a quarterly basis that will not be less than 50% of the net proceeds from the DRP during the applicable quarter.  As our board of directors has suspended the SRP, as discussed below, the current effective funding limit is irrelevant, and in any case there have been no net proceeds from the DRP, which has also been suspended. We continue to limit the number of shares repurchased during any calendar year to 5% of the number of shares outstanding on December 31st of the previous calendar year, as adjusted for any stock splits or other combinations.

Due to the uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and the need to preserve cash for the payment of operating and other expenses, such as debt payments, in this environment, our board of directors has suspended our SRP until further notice. The suspension of the SRP was effective on June 26, 2020 and no shares were repurchased since that time, except as noted. Also, on September 29, 2020, the Company entered into a first amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of August 1, 2018, which provides a waiver of the minimum tangible net worth requirement for three consecutive quarters

38

---

beginning with the quarter ended September 30, 2020, but restricts the Company from making any share repurchases or distributions without lender approval during this waiver period. Any unfulfilled repurchase requests will automatically roll over for processing under the terms and conditions of the SRP when we restart the plan, unless a stockholder withdraws the request for repurchase.

When the SRP is reinstated, if either or both of the repurchase limitations prevent us from repurchasing all of the shares offered for repurchase during a calendar quarter, we will repurchase shares, on a pro rata basis within each category below, in accordance with the repurchase limitations in the following order: (a) first, all Exceptional Repurchases and (b) second, all ordinary repurchases. For any quarter ended, unfulfilled repurchase requests will be included in the list of requests for the following quarter unless the request is withdrawn in accordance with the SRP. However, each stockholder who has submitted a repurchase request must submit an acknowledgment annually after we publish a new estimated value per share acknowledging, among other things, that the stockholder wishes to maintain the request. If we do not receive the acknowledgment prior to the repurchase date, we will deem the request to have been withdrawn.

The SRP will immediately terminate if our shares are listed on any national securities exchange. In addition, our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may amend, suspend (in whole or in part), or terminate our SRP. In the event that we amend, suspend or terminate the SRP, however, we will send stockholders notice of the change at least thirty days prior to the change, and we will disclose the change in a report filed with the SEC on either Form 8-K, Form 10-Q or Form 10-K, as appropriate. Further, our board reserves the right in its sole discretion, at any time, and from time to time to reject any requests for repurchases.

The following table summarizes the repurchases of shares under the SRP during the year ended December 31, 2020 (Dollar amounts in thousands except per share amounts):

 

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

For information regarding the securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plan, reference is made to Item 12 “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

39

---

The following table shows our selected financial data relating to our consolidated historical financial condition and results of operations. This selected data should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

 

 

 

40

---

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Certain statements in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “goal,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “variables,” “potential,” “continue,” “expand,” “maintain,” “create,” “strategies,” “likely,” “will,” “would” and variations of these terms and similar expressions, or the negative of these terms or similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but reflect the intent, belief or current expectations of our management based on their knowledge and understanding of the business and industry, the economy and other future conditions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and we caution stockholders not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including but not limited to the factors listed and described under “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the factors described below:

41

---

Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K reflect our management’s view only as of the date of this Report and may ultimately prove to be incorrect or false. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results except as required by applicable law. We intend for these forward-looking statements to be covered by the applicable safe harbor provisions created by Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act.

 

The following discussion and analysis is based on the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018. Our stockholders should read the following discussion and analysis along with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto.

 

Overview

 

We were formed as a Maryland corporation on August 24, 2011 and elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code, commencing with the year ended December 31, 2013.  We have no employees. We are managed by our business manager, IREIT Business Manager & Advisor, Inc.

We are primarily focused on acquiring and owning retail properties and intend to target a portfolio of 100% grocery-anchored properties as described below. We have invested in joint ventures and may continue to invest in additional joint ventures or acquire other real estate assets such as office and medical office buildings, multi-family properties and industrial/distribution and warehouse facilities if management believes the expected returns from those investments exceed that of retail properties. We also may invest in real estate-related equity securities of both publicly traded and private real estate companies, as well as commercial mortgage-backed securities.

At December 31, 2020, we had total assets of $1.2 billion and owned 44 properties located in 21 states containing 6.5 million square feet.  A majority of our properties are multi-tenant, necessity-based retail shopping centers primarily located in major regional markets and growing secondary markets throughout the United States. At December 31, 2020, grocery-anchored or grocery shadow-anchored shopping center properties represented 86% of our annualized base rent. A grocery shadow-anchored shopping center is a shopping center near a grocery store that generates traffic for the shopping center but is not a part of the shopping center. The portfolio properties have a weighted average economic occupancy of 93.3% and staggered lease maturity dates.

 

We commenced the Offering on October 18, 2012, and concluded it on October 16, 2015.  We sold 33,534,022 shares of common stock in the Offering generating gross proceeds of $834.4 million.  On March 5, 2021, our board of directors determined an Estimated Per Share NAV of our common stock as of December 31, 2020 of $18.08.  The previously estimated per share net asset value as of December 31, 2019 equal to $18.15 was established on March 3, 2020.

COVID-19 Pandemic

We are closely monitoring the impact of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic on all aspects of our business and locations, including how it is impacting our tenants and vendors. For the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized bad debt expense of $4.9 million, mostly resulting from the pandemic. Additionally, as of December 31, 2020, we have $4.5 million of deferred rent to be paid in the future, mostly throughout 2021, pursuant to agreements negotiated with tenants in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. See Note 14 – “Leases” for additional information. We are unable to predict with certainty the future impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows due to numerous uncertainties.

We cannot predict the entire impact that COVID-19 will have on our tenants and other business partners in the future, such as vendors and service providers; however, any material further effect on these parties would continue to adversely impact us.

42

---

As of March 15, 2021, many tenants continue to operate in a materially reduced capacity. The chart below shows (1) cash rent payments received as a percentage of the tenant’s rental obligations before deferrals agreed upon following the onset of the pandemic, (2) cash received for rent billed (the amount billed to a tenant is based on what is owed under the tenant’s lease and does not include rent that we have agreed with the tenant to defer) and (3) cash rents received in each month, in each case beginning with the month the WHO declared the outbreak of COVID-19 a pandemic through the most recent month for which meaningful data was available. Since September 2020, the Company has not granted a material amount of new deferrals, and collections of amounts due since that time have been at levels consistent with collections before the onset of the pandemic.

 

Payment plans mostly in the form of rent deferrals have been agreed upon with tenants at 279 locations since the onset of the pandemic, and we are still in active negotiations with other tenants. As of March 15, 2021, deferrals represent $5.9 million in total rent, or approximately 6% of ABR, and modifications and rent abatements represent $2.2 million in total rent, or 2% of ABR. Deferrals and abatements agreed upon with anchor tenants represent $4.7 million in rent, versus $3.4 million agreed upon with junior box and small-shop tenants. Not all tenant requests will ultimately result in payment plans, and we manage negotiations with tenants on a case-by-case basis. We have sent some tenants notices of default, including to one of our ten largest tenants by ABR, which has since resumed paying rent but with which we are still negotiating with respect to unpaid amounts still owed. January and February 2021 collections and rent relief requests to-date may not be indicative of collections or requests in any future period. We are closely monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the collectability of lease payments.

The full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our rental revenue for the first quarter of 2021 and thereafter cannot, however, be determined at present. The deferral periods for tenants averaged four months and most have ended. While some payments from tenants of deferred amounts began during the fourth quarter of 2020, the vast majority are due to be repaid throughout 2021. If tenants cannot or will not pay these deferred amounts of rent in addition to their normal rent due, they may request additional deferrals, breach their lease agreements with us, cease doing business, file for bankruptcy or some combination of the foregoing, any of which may have adverse effects on our operating results or financial position. Although vaccinations have begun, the situation surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic remains fluid, and we are actively managing our response in collaboration with tenants, government officials and business partners and assessing potential impacts to our financial position and operating results, as well as potential adverse developments in our business.

Of our bad debt expense recorded for the year ended December 31, 2020 (see Note 14 – “Leases”), we estimate that 61% of the total bad debt has been from tenants significantly affected by the pandemic, especially apparel and restaurants, and a considerable number of the apparel tenants have filed for bankruptcy. Tenants representing 11 locations and $2.2 million ABR (2.4% of total ABR) have filed for bankruptcy protection. As of December 31, 2020, certain tenants, estimated to be approximately 21% of the tenants with which we have entered into deferral agreements, have overdue balances some of which have been included in our allowance for bad debts.

43

---

Comparable leasing spreads for 2020 were 2.0% for new leases but -1.8% for renewals. Lease retention based on square footage was 92% for anchors but 64% for non-anchors, which we attribute to the more severe effect of the pandemic on smaller, non-anchor tenants. In managing the crisis created by the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been forced to make difficult decisions in the face of great uncertainty regarding future economic conditions and the financial condition of our tenants and believe we have done well to maintain a high occupancy rate making trade-offs where necessary, such as abatements, deferrals or lower rents when we believed it was advisable. To the extent we have agreed to what we believe are below-market rents to avoid vacancies and to accommodate tenants that we think will have viable businesses post-pandemic, we have tried to minimize the term of the lease with the intent to revisit rents when the economic effects of the pandemic have subsided and leasing market conditions are more favorable. At December 31, 2020, our portfolio had weighted average physical and economic occupancy of 92.8% and 93.3%, respectively. 35 leases comprising 282,034 square feet (47% of total square footage renewed) were extended early in connection with pandemic-related lease amendments.

Despite our best efforts, to the extent that the effects of the pandemic continue for a prolonged period of time or become more severe, the effects of the pandemic, including governmental restrictions imposed to combat the pandemic, are likely to result in additional tenant requests for deferrals or other lease modifications, failures to pay rent, bad debt expense or vacancies in the future. Conversely, if the ongoing vaccination effort is successful in allowing for retail business to operate at increased or pre-pandemic levels, or an affordable effective treatment for COVID-19 is developed, pent-up demand may follow for products and services such as those provided by restaurants, health, wellness and personal care service providers and apparel and accessory retailers.

We rely on the Business Manager to manage our day-to-day operations. Though many people have been able to work remotely effectively, the business and operations of our Business Manager and its affiliates may also be adversely impacted by further coronavirus outbreaks, particularly if new strains of the virus are more contagious or have more severe effects or both. The workforce of the Business Manager and its affiliates may become ill or have to be quarantined in large numbers, particularly if the corporate headquarters is re-opened for a large number of people, which may negatively impact the ability of this workforce to provide us services to the same degree as it had prior to the outbreak.

For further information regarding the potential impact of COVID-19 on the Company, see Part I, Item 1A titled “Risk Factors.”

44

---

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

General

Our primary uses and sources of cash are as follows:

 

 

During January 2020, we sold three properties generating net proceeds of $37.3 million, which we used primarily to pay down the amount outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility.

At December 31, 2020, we had $65 million outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility and $150 million outstanding under the Term Loan. At December 31, 2020 the interest rate on the Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan was 2.15% and 4.65%, respectively. The Revolving Credit Facility matures on August 1, 2022, and we have the option to extend the maturity date for one additional year subject to the payment of an extension fee and certain other conditions. The Term Loan matures on August 1, 2023. As of December 31, 2020, we had $135 million available for borrowing under the Revolving Credit Facility, subject to the terms and conditions, and assuming compliance with the covenants, of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement that governs the Credit Facility. Although $135 million is the maximum available, covenant limitations, particularly the leverage ratio, affect what we can actually draw, and we expect to have substantially less than $135 million actually available to draw or otherwise undertake as additional debt in 2021 depending on the future effects of the pandemic on our tenants, among other things. By “additional debt,” we mean debt in addition to existing debt such as existing mortgages. Our leverage ratio generally cannot exceed 60%, provided however that two times during the term of our Revolving Credit Facility our leverage ratio may be 62.5% for two consecutive quarters. Our leverage ratio was 55.5% as of December 31, 2020, as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility’s agreement.

On September 29, 2020, we entered into a first amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of August 1, 2018 with KeyBank National Association individually and as administrative agent, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., PNC Capital Markets LLC and Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (now BofA Securities, Inc.) as joint lead arrangers, and other lenders from time to time parties to the agreement. This amendment provides a waiver of the minimum tangible net worth requirement for three consecutive quarters beginning with the quarter ended September 30, 2020. In exchange, we agreed that our leverage ratio may be increased only to 62.5% (formerly 65%) for two consecutive fiscal quarters two times prior to the facility termination date, that we are restricted, during this waiver period, from making any share repurchases or distributions without lender approval, and that a LIBOR floor of 25 basis points will remain in effect for the remainder of the term. As of December 31, 2020, we have paid all interest and principal amounts when due, and are in compliance with all financial covenants related to the Credit Facility as amended. See our Part I, Item 1A titled “Risk Factors” above for discussion of risks stemming from our use of debt and a potential failure to comply with a covenant under the Credit Facility.

As of December 31, 2020, we had total debt outstanding of $631.0 million, excluding mortgage premiums and unamortized debt issuance costs, which bore interest at a weighted average interest rate of 3.76% per annum. As of December 31, 2020, the weighted average years to maturity for our debt was 2.5 years. As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, our borrowings were 47% and 49%, respectively, of the purchase price of our investment properties. At December 31, 2020 our cash and cash equivalents balance was $12.9 million.

In the next twelve months, we have six mortgage loans maturing with an aggregate principal balance of $82.7 million, which we intend to refinance or repay by drawing on the line of credit. For information related to our debt maturities reference is made to Note 7

45

---

– “Debt and Derivative Instruments” which is included in our December 31, 2020 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15.

Our board of directors has suspended distributions and rescinded the first quarter distribution that was expected to be paid on June 1, 2020 to stockholders of record on May 29, 2020. Our board of directors has also suspended our DRP and SRP until further notice. We have also delayed making non-essential capital improvements and other non-essential capital expenditures at our properties since the onset of the pandemic, where possible, to reduce expenses and preserve cash and expect to continue to delay non-essential capital expenditures until they become essential or until the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our tenants subside. These actions are being taken until there is better clarity on our tenants’ ability and willingness to pay rent and meet other lease obligations and, ultimately, the performance of our shopping centers. The suspension of the DRP was effective on June 6, 2020 and the suspension of the SRP was effective on June 26, 2020. Any unfulfilled repurchase requests will automatically roll over for processing under the terms and conditions of the SRP if we restart our plan, unless a stockholder withdraws the request for repurchase. . See “Share Repurchase Program” under “Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” above for the number of shares requested for repurchase and other information regarding our SRP.

Cash Flow Analysis

 

 

Operating activities

Cash provided by operating activities decreased $9.6 million during 2020 compared to 2019 and increased $1.7 million during 2019 compared to 2018. The decrease from 2019 to 2020 was due to reduced collections in 2020 due to COVID-19 and the sale of properties in 2019 and 2020. The increase from 2018 to 2019 was due to the timing of real estate tax and business manager fee payments partially offset by an increase in interest payments.  

Investing activities

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2020, cash provided by investing activities was higher than 2019 primarily due to higher proceeds from the sale of investment properties and lower capital expenditures in 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2019, cash was provided by investing activities compared to a use of cash in 2018, primarily due to proceeds from sale of investment properties in 2019. In addition, we did not fund any additional investments in the Mainstreet JV during 2019, compared to our funding of $2.7 million in equity investment and $5.4 million in related note receivable for which an impairment charge was recognized at the end of 2018. The line item for “Other assets and other liabilities” in 2018 includes the note receivable of $5.4 million from the Mainstreet JV, which was fully funded in 2018.

 

46

---

Financing activities

 

 

During 2020, cash expended on debt increased $28.1 million from 2019, primarily due to paydowns of the line of credit. During 2019, cash expended on debt decreased $38.6 million from 2018, primarily due to net paydowns on the credit facility and settlement of two mortgages associated with properties sold during 2019 compared to significant net drawings on the credit facility in the prior year, a majority of which was used to pay off a significant balance of mortgages with the residual used to fund other activities during 2018. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we generated proceeds from the sale of shares pursuant to the DRP of $4.5 million, $19.6 million and $19.3 million, respectively.  For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, share repurchases were $2.4 million, $12.6 million and $19.6 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we paid $10.8 million, $44.2 million and $40.3 million, respectively, in distributions. During 2018, we received cash of $1.2 million related to the early termination of interest rate swap agreements.

 

Distributions

A summary of the distributions declared, distributions paid and cash flows provided by operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 follows (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

 

See “Distributions” under “Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” above for the number of shares requested for repurchase and other information regarding our distributions to stockholders.

Results of Operations

The following discussion is based on our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.  

This section describes and compares our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.  We generate primarily all of our net operating income from property operations. In order to evaluate our overall portfolio, management analyzes the net operating income of properties that we have owned and operated for the periods presented, in their entirety, referred to herein as “same store” properties. By evaluating the property net operating income of our "same store" properties, management is able to monitor the operations of our existing properties for comparable periods to measure the performance of our current portfolio and determine the effects of any acquisitions or dispositions on net income. (Dollar amounts in thousands)

47

---

Comparison of the Years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019

We consider property net operating income an important financial measure because it reflects only those income and expense items that are incurred at the property level, and when compared across periods, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating expenses. Although property net operating income is a widely used measure among REITs, there can be no assurance that property net operating income presented by us is comparable to similarly titled metrics used by other REITs.

We calculate property net operating income using net income and excluding adjustments to straight-line income (expense) on operating leases, amortization of intangibles and lease incentives, general and administrative expenses, acquisition related costs, the business management fee, provisions for impairment, depreciation and amortization, interest expense, gains on sale of investment properties, gains on termination of interest rate swap agreements, losses on extinguishment of debt, and interest or other income.

A total of 44 investment properties that were acquired on or before January 1, 2019 and classified as held and used at December 31, 2020 represent our “same store” properties during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.  “Non-same store,” as reflected in the table below, consists of properties sold after January 1, 2019. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, 15 properties constituted non-same store properties.

The following table presents the property net operating income broken out between same store and non-same store, prior to straight-line income, net, amortization of intangibles, interest, and depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, along with a reconciliation to net loss, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

 

 

Net loss.  Net loss was $10,388 and $11,420 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

 

Total property net operating income.  On a “same store” basis, comparing the results of operations of investment properties owned during the year ended December 31, 2020 with the results of the same investment properties owned during the year ended December 31, 2019, property net operating income decreased $5,164, total property income decreased $8,524, and total property operating expenses including real estate tax expense decreased $3,360.

 

The decrease in “same store” total property income is primarily due to an increase in bad debt and lower reimbursements billed to tenants resulting from lower expenses during the year ended December 31, 2020, both primarily caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. See Note 14 – “Leases” for additional information regarding the effects of deferred rent and bad debt on rental income.

48

---

 

“Non-same store” total property net operating income decreased $3,789 during 2020 as compared to 2019. The decrease was due to 12 properties sold in the fourth quarter of 2019 and an additional three properties sold during the first quarter of 2020. On a “non-same store” basis, total property income decreased $5,459 and total property operating expenses decreased $1,670 during the year ended December 31, 2020.

Straight-line income, net. Straight-line rent income increased $125 in 2020 compared to 2019. This increase is primarily due to increased rent abatements in 2020.

Intangible amortization.  Intangible amortization income increased $640 in 2020 compared to 2019. The increase is primarily attributable to higher below market lease intangible write-offs during 2020 due to early tenant move-outs.

General and administrative expenses.  General and administrative expenses increased $166 in 2020 compared to 2019 primarily due to increased legal costs in 2020.

Business management fee. Business management fees decreased $418 in 2020 compared to 2019. The decrease is primarily due to 15 properties sold, including 12 in the fourth quarter of 2019 and three during January 2020.

Provision for asset impairment. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded $4,420 of impairment charges for our investment properties that were classified as held for sale at December 31, 2019, because these properties had a carrying value that exceeded the fair value less selling costs. No asset impairment charges were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2020.

Depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation and amortization decreased $4,857 in 2020 compared to 2019. The decrease is primarily due to properties sold in the fourth quarter 2019 and January 2020.

Interest expense.  Interest expense decreased $2,956 in 2020 compared to 2019. The decrease is primarily due to lower average interest rates and a decrease in average debt outstanding in 2020 compared to 2019. 

 

Gain on sale of investment properties. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded a gain of $3,279 related to the sale of 12 investment properties.

Interest and other income.  Interest and other income increased $14 in 2020 compared to 2019.  

Comparison of the Years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

A total of 44 investment properties that were acquired on or before January 1, 2018 and classified as held and used at December 31, 2019 represent our “same store” properties during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.  “Non-same store,” as reflected in the table below, consists of properties sold after January 1, 2018 or classified as held for sale at December 31, 2019. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, 15 properties constituted non-same store properties.

49

---

The following table presents the property net operating income broken out between same store and non-same store, prior to straight-line income, net, amortization of intangibles, interest, and depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, along with a reconciliation to net loss, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

 

 

Net loss.  Net loss was $11,420 and $23,276 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

 

Total property net operating income.  On a “same store” basis, comparing the results of operations of investment properties owned during the year ended December 31, 2019 with the results of the same investment properties owned during the year ended December 31, 2018, property net operating income decreased $272, total property income decreased $172, and total property operating expenses including real estate tax expense increased $100.

 

The decrease in “same store” total property income is primarily due to an increase in bad debt partially offset by an increase in base rental income. The increase in “same store” total property operating expenses is primarily due to an increase in current year non-recoverable property expenses.                        

 

“Non-same store” total property net operating income remained relatively flat, increasing $10 during 2019 as compared to 2018. The change was minimized due to the dispositions being at the very end of 2019. On a “non-same store” basis, total property income increased $103 and total property operating expenses increased $93 during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Straight-line income, net. Straight-line rent income decreased $340 in 2019 compared to 2018. This decrease is primarily due to rent steps that reduced straight-line income.

50

---

Intangible amortization.  Intangible amortization income increased $470 in 2019 compared to 2018. The increase is primarily attributable to intangible assets and liabilities being written off due to tenants that vacated early.

General and administrative expenses.  General and administrative expenses increased $171 in 2019 compared to 2018.  This increase is primarily due to higher legal costs and an increase in state tax estimates.

Acquisition related costs.  Acquisition related expenses decreased $29 in 2019 compared to 2018. The decrease is attributable to the fact that there were no acquisition related costs (recoveries) in 2019.

Business management fee. Business management fees remained relatively flat in 2019 compared to 2018. There have been no acquisitions since 2017 and any disposals during 2019 occurred near the end of the year.

Provision for asset impairment. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded $4,420 of impairment charges for our investment properties that were classified as held for sale at December 31, 2019, because these properties had a carrying value that exceeded the fair value less selling costs. No asset impairment charges were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation and amortization decreased $144 in 2019 compared to 2018. The decrease is primarily due to fully amortized acquired lease intangible assets partially offset by site improvement write-offs.

Interest expense.  Interest expense increased $1,168 in 2019 compared to 2018. The increase is primarily due to higher average interest rates and an increase in average debt outstanding in 2019 compared to 2018.  Average interest rates increased 0.12% in 2019 compared to 2018 and average debt outstanding increased approximately $3,100 in 2019 compared to 2018.

 

Gain on sale of investment properties. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded a gain of $3,279 related to the sale of 12 investment properties.

 

Gain on early termination of interest rate swap agreements. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded a gain of $1,151 related to the early termination of certain interest rate swap agreements that had corresponding early mortgage pay-offs.

Loss on extinguishment of debt. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we realized a loss on extinguishment of debt on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss of $411 due to the write-off of the unamortized balance of debt issuance costs associated with ten loans that were repaid prior to maturity.

Interest and other income.  Interest and other income decreased $373 in 2019 compared to 2018.  The decrease is primarily due to interest earned on our note receivable which was fully impaired at the end of 2018.

Provision for impairment of investment in and note receivable from unconsolidated entities.  During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded an impairment to its investment in and note receivable from Mainstreet JV of $9,865 and $5,540, respectively, as it determined that recovery is improbable. Both amounts represent a full impairment of such investments. As we do not intend to fund any more investments in Mainstreet JV and we do not expect to recover any of our previous investments, we determined that an impairment for both our investment and notes receivable from Mainstreet JV is appropriate.

Leasing Activity

The following table sets forth leasing activity during the year ended December 31, 2020. Leases with terms of less than 12 months have been excluded from the table.

 

 

51

---

Non GAAP Financial Measures

Accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. GAAP assumes the value of real estate assets is reduced over time due primarily to non-cash depreciation and amortization expense. Because real estate values may rise and fall with market conditions, operating results from real estate companies that use U.S. GAAP accounting may not present a complete view of their performance. We use Funds from Operations, or “FFO”, a widely accepted metric to evaluate our performance. FFO provides a supplemental measure to compare our performance and operations to other REITs. Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or “NAREIT”, has promulgated a standard known as FFO, which it believes more accurately reflects the operating performance of a REIT. On November 7, 2018, NAREIT’s Executive Board approved the White Paper restatement, effective December 15, 2018. The purpose of the restatement was not to change the fundamental definition of FFO but to clarify existing guidance. The restated definition of FFO by NAREIT is net income (loss) computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding depreciation and amortization related to real estate, excluding gains (or losses) from sales of certain real estate assets, excluding impairment write-downs of certain real estate assets and investments in entities when the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate and excluding gains and losses from change in control. We have adopted the restated NAREIT definition for computing FFO. Previously presented periods were not impacted.

Under U.S. GAAP, acquisition related costs are treated differently if the acquisition is a business combination or an asset acquisition. An acquisition of a single property will likely be treated as an asset acquisition as opposed to a business combination and acquisition related costs will be capitalized rather than expensed when incurred. Publicly registered, non-listed REITs typically engage in a significant amount of acquisition activity in the early years of their operations, and thus incur significant acquisition related costs, during these initial years. Although other start up entities may engage in significant acquisition activity during their initial years, publicly registered, non-listed REITs are unique in that they typically have a limited timeframe during which they acquire a significant number of properties and thus incur significant acquisition related costs. Due to the above factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives, or “IPA”, an industry trade group, published a standardized measure known as Modified Funds from Operations, or “MFFO”, which the IPA has promulgated as a supplemental measure for publicly registered non-listed REITs and which may be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a non-listed REIT. We believe it is appropriate to use MFFO as a supplemental measure of operating performance because we believe that, when compared year-over-year, both before and after we have deployed all of our Offering proceeds and are no longer incurring a significant amount of acquisition fees or other related costs, it reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income.

MFFO excludes expensed costs associated with investing activities, some of which are acquisition related costs that affect our operations only in periods in which properties are acquired, and other non-operating items that are included in FFO, such as straight-lining of rents as required by U.S. GAAP. By excluding costs that we consider more reflective of acquisition activities and other non-operating items, the use of MFFO provides another measure of our operating performance once our portfolio is stabilized. Because MFFO may be a recognized measure of operating performance within the non-listed REIT industry, MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it may be useful in order to evaluate our performance against other non-listed REITs. Like FFO, MFFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under U.S. GAAP, as detailed in the table below, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we continue to acquire a significant amount of properties. MFFO should only be used as a measurement of our operating performance while we are acquiring a significant amount of properties because it excludes, among other things, acquisition costs incurred during the periods in which properties were acquired.

We believe our definition of MFFO, a non-U.S. GAAP measure, is consistent with the IPA's Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds from Operations, or the “Practice Guideline,” issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for the following items, as applicable, included in the determination of U.S. GAAP net income: acquisition fees and expenses; amounts relating to straight-line rents and amortization of above and below market lease assets and liabilities, accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; nonrecurring gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis.

Our presentation of FFO and MFFO may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures presented by other REITs. We believe that the use of FFO and MFFO provides a more complete understanding of our operating performance to stockholders and to management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs. Neither FFO nor MFFO is intended to be an alternative to “net income” or to “cash flows from operating activities” as determined by U.S. GAAP as a measure of our capacity to pay distributions. Management uses FFO and MFFO to compare our operating performance to that of other REITs and to assess our operating performance.

52

---

Our FFO and MFFO for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 are calculated as follows (Dollar amounts in thousands):

 

 

Critical Accounting Policies

Our accounting policies have been established to conform with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” which is included in our December 31, 2020 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15. We have identified Impairment of Investment Properties and Collectability of Accounts and Rents Receivable as critical accounting policies.

We consider these policies to be critical because it requires our management to use judgment in the application of accounting policy, including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If management’s judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, thus resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

Impairment of Investment Properties

We assess the carrying values of the respective long-lived assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable. If it is determined that the carrying value is not recoverable because the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, we will be required to record an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds fair value. The valuation and possible subsequent impairment of investment properties will be a significant estimate that can change based on our continuous process of analyzing each property and reviewing assumptions about inherently uncertain factors, as well as the economic condition of the property at a particular point in time.

Collectability of Accounts and Rents Receivable

We make estimates and take into consideration certain factors that require judgments to be made as to the collectability of accounts and rents receivable. Collectability factors taken into consideration are the amounts outstanding, tenant credit worthiness, current economic trends and payment history of the tenant. We include both billed and accrued charges in our evaluation of the collectability of a tenant’s receivable balance. For tenant receivables that are considered not probable of being collected, we record an offset for uncollectable tenant revenues directly to rental income. Although we estimate uncollectible receivables and provide for them through a direct write-off against rental income, actual experience may differ from those estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For information related to recently issued accounting pronouncements, reference is made to Note 2 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” which is included in our December 31, 2020 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15.

53

---

 

Contractual Obligations

Our mortgages payable are generally non-recourse to us.  We have, however, guaranteed the full amount of each of the mortgages payable by our subsidiaries in the event that the applicable subsidiary fails to provide access or information to the properties or fails to obtain a lender’s prior written consent to any liens on or transfers of any of the properties, and in the event of any losses, costs or damages incurred by a lender as a result of fraud or intentional misrepresentation of the subsidiary borrower, gross negligence or willful misconduct, material waste of the properties and the breach of any representation or warranty concerning environmental laws, among other things.

 

The table below presents, on a consolidated basis, our obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations (including interest) and ground leases as of December 31, 2020. The ground lease commenced on July 1, 2007 and extends through June 30, 2037, with six 5-year options. Debt obligations under debt which is subject to variable rates reflect interest rates as of December 31, 2019 (Dollar amounts in thousands).

 

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

 

Market Risk

We are exposed to various market risks, including those caused by changes in interest rates and commodity prices. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates and commodity prices. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We have entered into, and may continue to enter into, financial instruments to manage and reduce the impact of changes in interest rates. The counterparties are, and are expected to continue to be, major financial institutions.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of long-term debt used to purchase properties or other real estate assets and to fund capital expenditures.

As of December 31, 2020, we had outstanding debt of $631.0 million, excluding mortgage premium and unamortized debt issuance costs, bearing interest rates ranging from 1.75% to 5.48% per annum. The weighted average interest rate was 3.76%, which includes the effect of interest rate swaps. As of December 31, 2020, the weighted average years to maturity for our mortgages and credit facility payable was 2.5 years.

 

As of December 31, 2020, our fixed-rate debt consisted of secured mortgage financings with a carrying value of $163.7 million and a fair value of $164.8 million. Changes in interest rates do not affect interest expense incurred on our fixed-rate debt until their maturity or earlier repayment, but interest rates do affect the fair value of our fixed rate debt obligations.  If market interest rates were to increase by 1% (100 basis points), the fair market value of our fixed-rate debt would decrease by $5.3 million at December 31, 2020. If market interest rates were to decrease by 1% (100 basis points), the fair market value of our fixed-rate debt would increase by $5.5 million at December 31, 2020.

At December 31, 2020, we had $65.7 million of debt or 10.4% of our total debt bearing interest at variable rates not fixed by swap agreements with a weighted average interest rate equal to 2.15% per annum. We had variable rate debt subject to swap agreements fixing the rate of $401.6 million or 63.6% of our total debt at December 31, 2020.

54

---

If interest rates on all debt which bears interest at variable rates as of December 31, 2020 increased by 1% (100 basis points), the increase in interest expense on all debt would decrease earnings and cash flows by $0.6 million annually. If interest rates on all debt which bears interest at variable rates as of December 31, 2020 decreased by 1% (100 basis points), interest expense would not change earnings and cash flows primarily due to the impact of the LIBOR floor on the Revolving Credit Facility.

With regard to variable rate financing, our Business Manager assesses our interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities. Our Business Manager maintains risk management control systems to monitor interest rate cash flow risk attributable to both of our outstanding or forecasted debt obligations as well as our potential offsetting hedge positions.

We use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates on loans secured by our assets. Derivative instruments may include interest rate swap contracts, interest rate cap or floor contracts, futures or forward contracts, options or repurchase agreements. Our actual hedging decisions are determined in light of the facts and circumstances existing at the time of the hedge. We have used derivative financial instruments, specifically interest rate swap contracts, to hedge against interest rate fluctuations on variable rate debt, which exposes us to both credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty will owe us, which creates credit risk for us because the counterparty may not perform. Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. We seek to manage the market risk associated with interest-rate contracts by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken. There is no assurance we will be successful.

In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. As a result, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York organized the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, which identified the SOFR as its preferred alternative to LIBOR in derivatives and other financial contracts. Subsequently, in November 2020, the Intercontinental Exchange (“ICE”) Benchmark Administration Limited (“IBA”), the administrator of LIBOR, announced that it would consult on its intention to cease the publication of the one-week and two-month USD LIBOR settings immediately following December 31, 2021 and the remaining USD LIBOR settings immediately following the LIBOR publication on June 30, 2023. We are not able to predict when LIBOR may be limited or discontinued or when there will be sufficient liquidity in the SOFR market. We have material contracts that are indexed to LIBOR and are monitoring this activity and evaluating the related risks.

Derivatives

For information related to derivatives, reference is made to Note 7 – “Debt and Derivative Instruments” which is included in our December 31, 2020 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15.

Our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to our consolidated financial statements are included under Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

None.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management has evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).  Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)

55

---

issued by the COSO, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2020.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to permanent rules adopted by the SEC, permitting the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

None.

 

 

56

---

Part III

Our directors and executive officers and their positions and ages are as follows:

 

Daniel L. Goodwin, 77. Director and the chairman of our board since July 2012. Mr. Goodwin has also served as a director of the Business Manager since August 2011. Mr. Goodwin is the Chairman and CEO of Inland, headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois. Inland is comprised of separate real estate investment and financial companies with managed assets with a value of approximately $10.5 billion, doing business nationwide with a presence in 43 states, as of December 31, 2019. Inland owns and manages properties in all real estate sectors, including retail, office, industrial and apartments. Mr. Goodwin also serves as a director or officer of entities wholly owned or controlled by The Inland Group LLC. In addition, Mr. Goodwin has served as the chairman of the board of Inland Mortgage Investment Corporation since March 1990, chairman, director and chief executive officer of Inland Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company, since January 2001 and chairman of the board of IREIC since January 2017. Mr. Goodwin also served as a director of Inland Real Estate Corporation (n/k/a IRC Retail Centers LLC) (“IRC”) from 2001 until its merger in March 2016, and served as its chairman of the board from 2004 to April 2008. Mr. Goodwin served as a director and the chairman of the board of Inland Residential Properties Trust, Inc. (“IRPT”) and as a director and the chairman of the board of the IRPT business manager, both from December 2013 until each company’s liquidation and dissolution in October 2019. Mr. Goodwin has served as chairman of Inland InPoint Advisor, LLC since October 2016, as a director and chairman of the board of MH Ventures Fund II, Inc. and its business manager, since September 2020, and as a director of IPCC since 2004. He also served as the chairman of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Public Non-Listed REIT Council from January 2010 through December 2017, and as a past Vice Chairman of the Chicago Better Government Association.

Housing. Mr. Goodwin is a member of the National Association of Realtors President’s Circle, the National Association of Realtors Hall of Fame, the Illinois Association of Realtors Hall of Fame and the Chicago Association of Realtors Hall of Fame. He is also the author of a nationally recognized real estate reference book for the management of residential properties. Mr. Goodwin served on the Board of the Illinois State Affordable Housing Trust Fund. He served as an advisor for the Office of Housing Coordination Services of the State of Illinois, and as a member of the Seniors Housing Committee of the National Multifamily Housing Council. He has served as Chairman of the DuPage County Affordable Housing Task Force. Mr. Goodwin also founded New Directions Housing Corporation, a not-for-profit entity that develops affordable housing for low income individuals.

Education. Mr. Goodwin obtained his bachelor’s degree and master’s degree from Illinois State universities. Following graduation, he taught for five years in the Chicago Public Schools. Over the past twenty years, Mr. Goodwin served as a member of the Board of Governors of Illinois State Colleges and Universities, vice chairman of the Board of Trustees of Benedictine University, vice chairman of the Board of Trustees of Springfield College, and chairman of the Board of Trustees of Northeastern Illinois University.

Our board believes that Mr. Goodwin’s 50 years of experience in real estate investing, commercial real estate brokerage, real estate securities, land development, construction and mortgage banking and commercial lending, make him well qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Lee A. Daniels, 78. Independent director since February 2012 and Lead Independent Director since September 2017. Mr. Daniels serves as Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Daniels has also served on the Kite Realty Group (“Kite”) Board of Trustees since 2014 and is a member of the Kite Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Mr. Daniels served on the board of directors of Inland Diversified Real Estate Trust, Inc. (“Inland Diversified”) from its inception in 2008 until its merger with Kite in 2014.

57

---

In February 2007, Mr. Daniels founded Lee Daniels & Associates, LLC, a consulting firm for government and community relations. Prior to that, Mr. Daniels was an equity partner at the Chicago law firm of Bell Boyd & Lloyd from 1992 to 2006, an equity partner at Katten, Muchin & Zavis from 1982 to 1991, and an equity partner at Daniels & Faris from 1967 to 1982. Mr. Daniels served as Special Assistant Attorney General for the State of Illinois from 1971 to 1974. He served as a member of the Illinois House of Representatives from 1975 to 2007, was the Republican Leader from 1983 to 1995 and 1998 to 2003, and was Speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives from 1995 to 1997.

Mr. Daniels currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Haymarket Center, a nonprofit behavioral health treatment center located in Chicago, Illinois. He served as the Chairman of the Presidential Search Committee for the College of DuPage from 2015 to 2016. He previously served on the Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare Board of Trustees from 1981 to 2013, the Board of Governors from 1990 to 2013, and the Elmhurst Memorial Hospital Foundation Board from 1980 to 1984 and 2013. Other boards Mr. Daniels has served on include the Suburban Bank and Trust Company of Elmhurst Board of Directors from 1994 to 1996, the Elmhurst Federal Savings and Loan Association Board of Directors from 1991 to 1994, and the DuPage Easter Seals Board of Directors from 1970 to 1973.

Mr. Daniels received his bachelor’s degree from the University of Iowa and his law degree from The John Marshall Law School in Chicago. He received a Distinguished Alumni Award from both The John Marshall Law School and the University of Iowa, and an Honorary Doctor of Laws from Elmhurst College.

Our board believes that Mr. Daniels’ depth of knowledge and experience, based on his 50 years of legal practice and experience in commercial real estate, make him well qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Stephen L. Davis, 63. Independent director since February 2012. Mr. Davis serves as a member of the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Davis has over 30 years of experience in real estate development. Mr. Davis has been the president of The Will Group, Inc., a construction company, since founding the company in 1986. In his position with The Will Group, Mr. Davis was instrumental in the construction of Kennedy King College campus, located in Chicago, Illinois, and the coordination of the "Plan For Transformation" for Altgeld Gardens, a public housing development located in Chicago, Illinois. Since October 2003, Mr. Davis has also overseen property management operations for several properties owned by a family-owned real estate trust.

Since March 2004, Mr. Davis has served as commissioner of aviation (board chair) of the DuPage County Airport Authority, in DuPage County, Illinois, which oversees management of the DuPage County Airport, Prairie Landing Golf Course and the 500-acre DuPage County Business Park. From 2006 to 2016, Mr. Davis served as a director of Wheaton Bank & Trust, where he was a member of the loan committee, which was responsible for reviewing and analyzing residential and commercial loan portfolios, developer credentials and viability, home builders and commercial and industrial loans. Mr. Davis obtained his bachelor degree from the University of Tennessee, located in Knoxville.

Our board believes that Mr. Davis’ prior real estate development experience and his leadership qualities make him well qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Gwen Henry, 80. Independent director since February 2012. Ms. Henry serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee and a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Ms. Henry currently serves as the Treasurer of DuPage County, Illinois, a position she has held since December 2006. In this position, Ms. Henry is responsible for the custody and distribution of DuPage County funds. In addition, from April 1981 to 2019, Ms. Henry was a partner at Dugan & Lopatka, a regional accounting firm, and a member of the firm’s controllership and consulting services practice, where she specialized in financial consulting and tax and business planning for privately-held companies. Since December 2009, Ms. Henry has also served as a member of the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund, a $43 billion fund which has investments in excess of $1.2 billion allocated to real estate. She currently serves as chair of the investment committee, and is a member of the audit committee and the legislative committee of the fund.

Ms. Henry previously served as DuPage County Forest Preserve Commissioner (from December 2002 to November 2006) and as chair to the special committee responsible for the DuPage County Budget (from December 2002 to November 2004), and was a member of the DuPage County Finance Committee (from November 1996 to November 2002). Ms. Henry also has held a number of board and chair positions for organizations such as the Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital (as treasurer from June 2002 to May 2008), the Central DuPage Health System (as chairperson of the board from October 1995 to September 1999), and the Central DuPage Hospital Foundation (as director from October 2002 to present). She was elected Mayor of the City of Wheaton, Illinois from March 1990 to December 2002.

Ms. Henry received her bachelor degree from the University of Kansas, located in Lawrence, Kansas. She is a certified public accountant, a designated certified public funds investment manager and a certified public finance administrator.

58

---

Our board believes that Ms. Henry’s over 35 years of public accounting experience makes her well qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Bernard J. Michael, 61. Independent director since September 2014. Mr. Michael serves as a member of the Audit Committee and, since September 2017, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Michael is a managing partner and founding member of AWH Partners, LLC, a privately held real estate investment, development and management firm. Since 2010, AWH has completed in excess of $1.4 billion of hotel investments, and is managing or has completed hotel redevelopment projects totaling more than $300 million. In early 2012, AWH acquired Lane Hospitality, which it rebranded as Spire Hospitality, a top-tier national hospitality platform formed in 1980.

Mr. Michael has over 25 years of experience as a real estate attorney working on sophisticated real estate transactions across all asset classes for some of the world's largest property owners, developers and lenders. Prior to founding AWH Partners, Mr. Michael was the founder and senior partner of Michael, Levitt & Rubenstein, LLC, a law firm focusing on real estate sales, acquisitions, development, leasing and financing. Mr. Michael and his team worked on some of the largest transactions in New York City, including the development of Time Warner Center and the Hudson Yards projects for The Related Companies. In addition, Mr. Michael and his firm represented developers on major multi-family, retail, office and hospitality projects in China, Saudi Arabia, and in most major cities across the United States.

Prior to forming Michael Levitt, Mr. Michael was a partner in the Real Estate Group at Proskauer Rose, LLP. Prior to that, Mr. Michael was an attorney at Weil, Gotschal & Manges and Shea & Gould. Mr. Michael is a graduate of Brown University and New York University School of Law.

Our board believes that Mr. Michael’s prior business experience and his leadership qualities make him well qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Mitchell A. Sabshon, 68. Director since September 2014, our chief executive officer since April 2014 and our president since December 2016. Mr. Sabshon has also served as a director and president of the Business Manager since October 2013 and December 2016, respectively. Mr. Sabshon is also currently the chief executive officer, president and a director of IREIC, positions he has held since August 2013, January 2014 and September 2013, respectively. He is a director, the president and chief executive officer of the IRPT business manager since December 2013 and was a director and the president and chief executive officer of IRPT from December 2013 until December 2019. Mr. Sabshon is currently the Chief Executive Officer of Inland Venture Partners, LLC, a position he has held since November 2018, Chief Executive Officer of Inland Ventures MHC Manager, LLC, a position he has held since December 2018, and Chief Executive Officer and director of MH Ventures Fund II, Inc. and its business manager, positions he has held since September 2020. Mr. Sabshon also serves as the chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer of InPoint Commercial Real Estate Income, Inc. (“InPoint”), positions he has held since September 2016 and October 2016, respectively, and as the chief executive officer of the InPoint advisor since August 2016. Mr. Sabshon has also served as a director and chairman of the board of IPCC since September 2013 and January 2015, respectively, and a director of Inland Securities Corporation (“Inland Securities”) since January 2014. He has also served as chief executive officer of Inland Venture Partners, LLC since November 2018.

Prior to joining Inland, Mr. Sabshon served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Cole Real Estate Investments, where he oversaw the company's finance, leasing, property management and asset management operations. Prior to joining Cole, Mr. Sabshon held several senior executive positions at leading financial services firms. He spent almost 10 years at Goldman, Sachs & Co. in various leadership roles including President and CEO of Goldman Sachs Commercial Mortgage Capital. He also served as a Senior Vice President in Lehman Brothers' real estate investment banking group. Prior to joining Lehman Brothers, Mr. Sabshon was an attorney in the corporate and real estate structured finance practice groups at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom in New York. Mr. Sabshon is also a member of the International Council of Shopping Centers, the Urban Land Institute, the National Association of Corporate Directors, a member of the Board of Trustees of the American Friends of Hebrew University - Midwest Region and the Board of Directors of Timeline Theatre Company. Mr. Sabshon is also a member of the New York State Bar, a former Chairman Emeritus of the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives and holds the Board Leadership Fellowship designation of the National Association of Corporate Directors. He also holds a real estate broker license in New York. He received his undergraduate degree from George Washington University and his law degree at Hofstra University School of Law.

Our board believes that Mr. Sabshon’s extensive finance and real estate experience make him well qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Catherine L. Lynch, 62 Our chief financial officer since April 2014, and a director of the Business Manager since August 2011. Ms. Lynch joined Inland in 1989 and has been a director of The Inland Group LLC since June 2012. She serves as the treasurer and secretary (since January 1995), the chief financial officer (since January 2011) and a director (since April 2011) of IREIC and as a director (since July 2000) and chief financial officer and secretary (since June 1995) of Inland Securities. She also served as the chief financial officer of IRPT and the IRPT business manager from December 2013 until October 2019. She also served as the treasurer of

59

---

the IRPT business manager from December 2013 to October 2014. Ms. Lynch also serves as the chief financial officer and treasurer (since October 2016) of InPoint and as the chief financial officer and treasurer of the InPoint advisor (since August 2016). Ms. Lynch also has served as a director of IPCC since May 2012. Ms. Lynch served as the treasurer of Inland Capital Markets Group, Inc. from January 2008 until October 2010, as a director and treasurer of Inland Investment Advisors, LLC from June 1995 to December 2014 and as a director and treasurer of Inland Institutional Capital, LLC from May 2006 to December 2014. Ms. Lynch worked for KPMG Peat Marwick LLP from 1980 to 1989. Ms. Lynch received her bachelor degree in accounting from Illinois State University in Normal. Ms. Lynch is a certified public accountant and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Illinois CPA Society. Ms. Lynch also is registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) as a financial operations principal.

Roberta S. Matlin, 76. Our vice president, and the vice president of the Business Manager, since August 2011. Ms. Matlin joined IREIC in 1984 as director of investor administration and currently serves as a director and senior vice president of IREIC. Ms. Matlin has served as senior vice president of MH Ventures II Business Manager, LLC since September 2020, vice president of The Inland Group, LLC, senior vice president of The Inland Real Estate Group, LLC since January 2015, a director of IPCC since May 2001, a vice president of Inland Institutional Capital, LLC since May 2006 and a manager since August 2012. She has served as president of Inland Opportunity Business Manager & Advisor, Inc. since April 2009 and as a director since January 2015. She also has served as a director and president of Inland Investment Advisors, LLC from June 1995 until May 2017, a director and president of Inland Securities from July 1995 to March 1997 and director and vice president since April 1997 and a director of Inland Business Manager & Advisor Group, Inc. since January 2014. Ms. Matlin has served as a director of Pan American Bank since December 2007. She served as vice president of administration of the IRPT business manager from December 2013 to October 2019 and as vice president of administration of the InPoint advisor since August 2016. Since February 2018 Ms. Matlin has severed as a Vice President of The Inland Group LLC. Ms. Matlin served as vice president of administration of Inland Diversified from June 2008 through July 2014 and also served as the president of Inland Diversified Business Manager & Advisor, Inc. from June 2008 through May 2009 and its vice president until July 2014. She served as vice president of administration of InvenTrust Properties Corp. since its inception in October 2004 through February 2014. She also served as the president of Inland American Business Manager & Advisor, Inc. from October 2004 until January 2012, its vice president until February 2014 and a director from March 2014 until March 2016. Ms. Matlin served as vice president of administration of Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. from 2003 until 2007, vice president of administration of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. from 1998 until 2004, vice president of administration of IRC from 1995 until 2000 and trustee and executive vice president of Inland Mutual Fund Trust from 2001 until 2004.

Prior to joining Inland, Ms. Matlin worked for the Chicago Region of the Social Security Administration of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Ms. Matlin is a graduate of the University of Illinois in Champaign. She holds Series 7, 22, 24, 39, 63, 65, 79 and 99 licenses from FINRA.

Cathleen M. Hrtanek, 44. Our corporate secretary, and the secretary of the Business Manager, since August 2011. Ms. Hrtanek joined Inland in 2005 and is currently assistant general counsel and vice president of The Inland Real Estate Group, LLC. In her capacity as assistant general counsel, Ms. Hrtanek represents many of the entities that are part of The Inland Real Estate Group of Companies on a variety of legal matters. Ms. Hrtanek also has served as secretary of MH Ventures Fund II, Inc. and its business manager since September 2020, the secretary of the InPoint advisor since August 2016, assistant secretary of InPoint since August 2019, secretary of IRPT and its business manager from December 2013 to October 2019, secretary of Inland Opportunity Business Manager & Advisor, Inc. since April 2009, secretary of Inland Diversified from September 2008 through July 2014 and its business manager from September 2008 through March 2016, and secretary of IPCC from August 2009 through May 2017. Prior to joining Inland, Ms. Hrtanek was employed by Wildman Harrold Allen & Dixon LLP in Chicago, Illinois from September 2001 until 2005. Ms. Hrtanek has been admitted to practice law in the State of Illinois. Ms. Hrtanek received her bachelor degree from the University of Notre Dame in South Bend, Indiana and her law degree from Loyola University Chicago School of Law.

Board of Directors

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

We have separated the roles of the president and chairman of the board in recognition of the differences between the two roles. Mr. Sabshon, in his role as both our president and chief executive officer and the president and chief executive officer of the Business Manager, is responsible for setting the strategic direction for the Company and for providing the day-to-day leadership of the Company. Mr. Goodwin, as chairman of the board, organizes the work of the board and ensures that the board has access to sufficient information to carry out its functions. Mr. Goodwin presides over meetings of the board of directors and stockholders, establishes the agenda for each meeting and oversees the distribution of information to directors.

Lee A. Daniels currently serves as our Lead Independent Director. Although each board member is kept apprised of our business and developments impacting our business, our board determined to designate a Lead Independent Director to coordinate the activities of the independent directors and serve as the principal liaison between the independent directors and the chairman of the board.

60

---

The Lead Independent Director presides at meetings when the chairman of the board is absent; establishes board meeting agendas in collaboration with the chairman of the board and the various committee chairs and recommends matters for the board and committees to consider; advises the chairman of the board as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the information submitted to the directors that is appropriate for the directors to effectively perform their duties and approves the information submitted to them; calls meetings of the independent directors or calls for executive sessions during board meetings; and presides at meetings of the independent directors or executive sessions of the board. The Lead Independent Director also performs such other responsibilities as the board may determine.

Our board believes that its Lead Independent Director structure, including the duties and responsibilities described above, provides the same independent leadership, oversight, and benefits for the Company and the board that would be provided by an independent chairman of the board. Our full board of directors, including our independent directors, is responsible for approving all material transactions, and each transaction between us and the Business Manager or its affiliates must be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction. In addition, each board member is kept apprised of our business and developments impacting our business and has complete and open access to the members of our management team, the Business Manager and our real estate manager, Inland Commercial Real Estate Services LLC (our “Real Estate Manager”).

Our board is actively involved in overseeing risk management for the Company. Our board of directors oversees risk through: (1) its review and discussion of regular periodic reports to the board of directors and its committees, including management reports and studies on existing market conditions, leasing activity and property operating data, as well as actual and projected financial results, and various other matters relating to our business; (2) the required approval by the board of directors of material transactions, including, among others, acquisitions and dispositions of properties, financings and our agreements with the Business Manager, our Real Estate Manager and the ancillary service providers; (3) the oversight of our business by the audit committee; and (4) its review and discussion of regular periodic reports from our independent registered public accounting firm and other outside consultants regarding various areas of potential risk, including, among others, those relating to the qualification of the Company as a REIT for tax purposes and our internal control over financial reporting.

Communicating with Directors

Stockholders wishing to communicate with our board and the individual directors may send communications by letter, e-mail or telephone, in care of our corporate secretary, who will review and forward all correspondence to the appropriate person or persons for a response.

Our non-retaliation policy, also known as our “whistleblower” policy, prohibits us from retaliating or taking any adverse action against our employees (if we ever have employees), or the employees of the Business Manager or its affiliates, for raising a concern, including concerns about accounting, internal controls or auditing matters. Employees may raise their concerns by contacting our compliance officer at (630) 218-8000. In addition, confidential complaints involving the Company’s accounting, auditing, and internal auditing controls and disclosure practices may be raised anonymously via email or mail as described in our non-retaliation policy. A complete copy of our non-retaliation policy may be found on our website at www.inland-investments.com/inland-income-trust under the “Corporate Governance” tab.

Anti-Hedging Policy

The insider trading policy of IREIC and its affiliated entities, including our Business Manager and Real Estate Manager, prohibits officers, directors and employees of these entities, including our executive officers, from engaging, without the prior written consent of the applicable employer, in hedging or monetization transactions such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts that allow a person to lock in a portion of the value of his or her shares in any Inland entity or any entity sponsored by or advised by IREIC or by any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries. This includes shares of our common stock. Because there is no established public trading market for our common stock and we do not have any employees, the Company itself has not separately adopted any specific practices or policies regarding the ability of our directors, officers or employees to purchase financial instruments or otherwise engage in transactions that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of our common stock or any other securities that we might issue.

Committees of our Board of Directors

Audit Committee. Our board has formed a separately-designated standing audit committee, comprised of Ms. Henry and Messrs. Daniels, Davis and Michael, each of whom is “independent” within the meaning of the applicable listing standards of the NYSE. Ms. Henry serves as the chairperson of this committee, and our board has determined that Ms. Henry qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC. The audit committee assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to, among other things: (1) the integrity of our financial statements; (2) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (3) the

61

---

qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm; and (4) the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Our board has formed a nominating and corporate governance committee consisting of Ms. Henry and Messrs. Daniels, Davis and Michael, each of whom is “independent” within the meaning of the applicable listing standards of the NYSE. Mr. Daniels serves as the chairman of this committee. The nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for, among other things: (1) identifying individuals qualified to serve on the board and the nominating and corporate governance committee and recommending to the board a slate of director nominees for election by the stockholders at the annual meeting; (2) periodically reevaluating any corporate governance policies and principles adopted by the board, including recommending any amendments thereto if appropriate; and (3) overseeing an annual evaluation of the board. The nominating and corporate governance committee is also responsible for considering director nominees submitted by stockholders.

The committee considers all qualified candidates identified by members of the committee, by other members of the board of directors, by the Business Manager and by stockholders. In recommending candidates for director positions, the committee takes into account many factors and evaluates each director candidate in light of, among other things, the candidate’s knowledge, experience, judgment and skills such as an understanding of the real estate industry or financial industry or accounting or financial management expertise. Other considerations include the candidate’s independence from conflict with the Company, the Business Manager and the Sponsor and the ability of the candidate to devote an appropriate amount of effort to board duties. The committee also focuses on persons who are actively engaged in their occupations or professions or are otherwise regularly involved in the business, professional or academic community. A majority of our directors must be “independent,” as defined in our charter. Moreover, as required by our charter, at least one of our independent directors must have at least three years of relevant real estate experience, and each director must have at least three years of relevant experience demonstrating the knowledge and experience required to successfully acquire and manage the type of assets we acquire. The committee also considers diversity in its broadest sense, including persons diverse in geography, gender and ethnicity as well as representing diverse experiences, skills and backgrounds. The committee evaluates each individual candidate by considering all of these factors as a whole, favoring active deliberation rather than the use of rigid formulas to assign relative weights to these factors.

Other Committees. Our board does not have a compensation committee or charter that governs the compensation process. Instead, the full board of directors performs the functions of a compensation committee, including reviewing and approving all forms of compensation for our independent directors that have been reviewed and recommended by our nominating and corporate governance committee. In addition, our independent directors determine, at least annually, that the compensation that we contract to pay to the Business Manager is reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of services performed or to be performed, and is within the limits prescribed by our charter and applicable law. Our board does not believe that it requires a separate compensation committee at this time because we neither separately compensate our executive officers for their service as officers, nor do we reimburse either the Business Manager or our Real Estate Manager for any compensation paid to their employees who also serve as our executive officers.

Code of Ethics

Our board has adopted a code of ethics applicable to our directors, officers and employees (if we ever have employees) which is available on our website at www.inland-investments.com/inland-income-trust under the “Corporate Governance” tab. In addition, printed copies of the code of ethics are available to any stockholder, without charge, by writing us at 2901 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523, Attention: Investor Services.

Any waivers of the provisions of the code of ethics for executive officers or directors may be granted only in exceptional circumstances by our board or a committee of our board. Any waivers will be promptly disclosed to the extent required by law. Any amendments to the code of ethics must also be approved by our board. If we make any substantive amendments to the code of ethics or grant any waiver, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the code of ethics to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions, we may, rather than filing a Current Report on Form 8-K, satisfy the disclosure requirement by posting such information on our website as necessary.

Compensation of Executive Officers

All of our executive officers are officers of IREIC or one or more of its affiliates and are compensated by those entities, in part, for services rendered to us. We neither compensate our executive officers nor reimburse either the Business Manager or Real Estate Manager for any compensation paid to individuals who also serve as our executive officers, or the executive officers of the Business Manager, our Real Estate Manager or their respective affiliates; provided that, for these purposes, a corporate secretary is not considered an “executive officer.” As a result, we do not have, and our board of directors has not considered, a compensation policy or program for our executive officers and has not included a “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” a report from our board of directors with respect to executive compensation, a non-binding stockholder advisory vote on compensation of executives, a non-

62

---

binding stockholder advisory vote on the frequency of the stockholder vote on executive compensation or the pay ratio between employees and our principal executive officer. The fees we pay to the Business Manager and Real Estate Manager under the business management agreement or the real estate management agreement, respectively, are described in more detail under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

In the future, our board may decide to pay annual compensation or bonuses or long-term compensation awards to one or more persons for services as officers. We also may, from time to time, grant restricted shares of our common stock to one or more of our officers. If we decide to pay our named executive officers in the future, the board of directors will review all forms of compensation and approve all stock option grants, warrants, stock appreciation rights and other current or deferred compensation payable to the executive officers with respect to the current or future value of our shares. In addition, the board will include the non-binding stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation and on the frequency of stockholder votes on executive compensation in the relevant proxy statement as required pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act.

Independent Director Compensation

The following table summarizes compensation earned by the independent directors for the year ended December 31, 2020 (Dollar amounts in thousands):

 

Cash Compensation

We pay our independent directors an annual fee of $44,000 plus $2,000 for each in-person meeting of the board and $750 for each meeting of the board attended by telephone; we also pay our independent directors $1,400 for each in-person meeting of each committee of the board and $550 for each meeting of each committee of the board attended by telephone. We pay the chairperson of the nominating and corporate governance committee of our board an annual fee of $8,500 and the chairperson of the audit committee of our board an annual fee of $13,200. We pay the Lead Independent Director an annual fee of $5,000.

We reimburse all of our directors for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in attending meetings. Each independent director may elect to receive payment of all or a portion of his or her fee in the form of unrestricted shares in lieu of cash pursuant to our employee and director restricted share plan (the “RSP”) and may elect to defer the receipt of all or a portion of his or her fee pursuant to our director deferred compensation plan (the “DDCP”). We do not compensate any director that also is an employee of the Business Manager or its affiliates.

Stock Compensation

On March 21, 2016 the board of directors approved the RSP, which was subsequently approved by the Company’s stockholders at the annual stockholders’ meeting on June 16, 2016. The RSP provides us with the ability to grant awards of restricted shares and restricted share units to directors, officers and employees (if we ever have employees) of us, our affiliate or the Business Manager. Under the RSP, on the date of the annual stockholders’ meeting in 2020, each independent director received an award of restricted shares of common stock having a fair market value as of the date of grant equal to $20,000 or, in lieu thereof, restricted share units. Restricted shares and restricted share units issued to independent directors pursuant to these grants vest over a three-year period following the respective date of grant in increments of 33-1/3% per annum, subject to their continued service as directors until each vesting date, and become fully vested earlier upon a liquidity event or upon the termination of a director by reason of his or her death or disability. The total number of common shares granted under the RSP may not exceed 5.0% of our outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis at any time (as such number may be adjusted to reflect any increase or decrease in the number of outstanding shares resulting from a stock split, stock dividend, reverse stock split or similar change in our capitalization).

63

---

Other restricted share awards entitle the recipient to receive shares of common stock from us under terms that provide for vesting over a specified period of time or upon attainment of pre-established performance objectives. Such awards would typically be forfeited with respect to the unvested shares upon the termination of the recipient’s employment or service as a director for any reason other than death or disability or, if applicable, the termination of the business management agreement with the Business Manager. Restricted shares may not, in general, be sold or otherwise transferred until restrictions are removed and the shares have vested. Holders of restricted shares have the right to vote such shares and may receive distributions prior to the time that the restrictions on the restricted shares have lapsed. As of December 31, 2020, there were 6,457 unvested restricted shares and 683 unvested restricted share units outstanding under the RSP.

Deferred Compensation Plan

Effective November 9, 2016, we adopted the DDCP approved by our board that provides a deferred compensation arrangement to our independent directors and their beneficiaries. Under the DDCP, independent directors may elect to defer the receipt of all or a portion of their cash and stock compensation. Eligible cash compensation that is deferred is credited to a book entry account established for each participant in an amount equal to the amount deferred, and restricted share units are issued under the RSP in lieu of all or a portion of stock compensation otherwise payable in restricted shares. A participant has a fully vested right to his cash deferral amounts, and the deferred share unit awards will vest on the same terms and schedule as the underlying eligible stock compensation would have otherwise been subject if granted in restricted shares. Unless otherwise determined by the board, while restricted share units are unvested, participants will be credited with dividend equivalents equal in value to those declared and paid on shares of Company common stock, on all restricted share units granted to them. These dividend equivalents will be regarded as having been reinvested in restricted share units, and will only be paid to the extent the underlying restricted share units vest. Payment of restricted share units will be made, to the extent vested, in shares of Company common stock, unless otherwise determined by the board. Except as otherwise determined by the board, account balances under the DDCP will not be credited with interest or any other credits, although the Company may permit an account to be credited with earnings with respect to restricted share units.

The DDCP provides our board with the discretion to amend, suspend or terminate the DDCP at any time, provided that any amendment, suspension or termination will not be made if it would substantially impair the rights of any participant under the DDCP.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

We have no employees and do not compensate our executive officers. See the discussion under “Compensation of Executive Officers” above for additional detail regarding compensation and the discussion under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” above for disclosures called for by Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

Stock Owned by Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

Based on a review of filings with the SEC, the following table reflects the amount of common stock beneficially owned (unless otherwise indicated) by (1) persons that beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock; (2) our directors and each nominee for director; (3) our executive officers; and (4) our directors and executive officers as a group. All information is as of March 17, 2021.

* Less than 1%

(1) The business address of each person listed in the table is c/o Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc., 2901 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523.

(2) All fractional ownership amounts have been rounded to the nearest whole number.

64

---

(3) Mr. Goodwin shares voting and dispositive power with his wife over 5,556 shares. Mr. Goodwin’s beneficial ownership includes 134,788 shares owned by the Goodwin 2012 Descendants Trust, 17,140 shares owned by a 2012 Gift Trust, 34,440 shares owned by another 2012 Gift Trust and 96,889 shares owned by Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation. Mr. Goodwin’s wife, as trustee, has sole voting and investment power over the shares owned by the Goodwin 2012 Descendants Trust. Mr. Goodwin controls the voting and disposition decisions with respect to the shares owned by the two 2012 Gift Trusts and Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation.

(4) Includes 1,102 unvested restricted shares. Does not include 683 restricted share units granted to Mr. Daniels, which will be settled in future periods pursuant to their terms. Each restricted share unit represents the right to receive one share of common stock and an amount equal to the cash value of the dividends that would have been paid to Mr. Daniels if one share of common stock had been issued on the grant date for each restricted share unit granted to Mr. Daniels under the award, but does not confer current dispositive or voting control of any shares of common stock. Mr. Daniels has sole voting and investment power over all of the shares that he beneficially owns.

(5) Includes 1,785 unvested restricted shares. Mr. Davis has sole voting and investment power over all of the shares that he beneficially owns.

(6) Includes 1,785 unvested restricted shares. Ms. Henry shares voting and dispositive power with her husband over all of the shares that they own.

(7) Includes 1,785 unvested restricted shares. Mr. Michael has sole voting and investment power over all of the shares that he beneficially owns.

(8) Mr. Sabshon has sole voting and investment power over all of the shares that he beneficially owns.

(9) Ms. Lynch shares voting and dispositive power with her husband over all of the shares that they own.

(10) Ms. Matlin has sole voting and investment power over all of the shares that she beneficially owns.

(11) Ms. Hrtanek has sole voting and investment power over all of the shares that she beneficially owns.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under the RSP

The following table sets forth information regarding securities authorized for issuance under the RSP as of December 31, 2020:

 

Set forth below is a summary of the material transactions between the Company and various affiliates of IREIC, including the Business Manager and Real Estate Manager, during the year ended December 31, 2020. IREIC is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of The Inland Group LLC. Please see the biographical information of our directors and executive officers elsewhere in this annual report statement for information regarding their relationships to Inland, including IREIC and The Inland Group LLC.

Business Management Agreement

We have entered into a business management agreement with IREIT Business Manager & Advisor Inc., which serves as the Business Manager with responsibility for overseeing and managing our day-to-day operations. Subject to satisfying the criteria described below, we pay the Business Manager an annual business management fee equal to 0.65% of our “average invested assets,” payable quarterly in an amount equal to 0.1625% of our average invested assets as of the last day of the immediately preceding quarter; provided that the Business Manager may decide, in its sole discretion, to be paid an amount less than the total amount to which it is entitled in any particular quarter, and the excess amount that is not paid may, in the Business Manager’s sole discretion, be waived permanently or deferred or accrued, without interest, to be paid at a later point in time. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Business Manager was entitled to a business management fee of approximately $8.9 million, of which approximately $4.5 million remained unpaid as of December 31, 2020.

As used herein, “average invested assets” means, for any period, the average of the aggregate book value of our assets, including all intangibles and goodwill, invested, directly or indirectly, in equity interests in, and loans secured by, properties, as well as amounts invested in securities and consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures or other partnerships, before reserves for amortization and

65

---

depreciation or bad debts, impairments or other similar non-cash reserves, computed by taking the average of these values at the end of each month during the relevant calendar quarter.

If the business management agreement is terminated, including in connection with the internalization of the functions performed by the Business Manager, the obligation to pay this business management fee will terminate.

Upon a “triggering event,” we will pay the Business Manager a subordinated incentive fee equal to 10% of the amount by which (1) the “liquidity amount” (as defined below) exceeds (2) the “aggregate invested capital,” plus the total distributions required to be paid to our stockholders in order to pay them a 7% per annum cumulative, pre-tax non-compounded return on the aggregate invested capital, all measured as of the triggering event. If we have not satisfied this return threshold at the time of the applicable triggering event, the fee will be paid at the time of any future triggering event, provided that we have satisfied the return requirements. We did not experience a “triggering event,” and thus did not incur a subordinated incentive fee, during the year ended December 31, 2020.

As used herein, a “triggering event” means any sale of assets (excluding the sale of marketable securities) in which the net sales proceeds are specifically identified and distributed to our stockholders, or any liquidity event, such as a listing or any merger, reorganization, business combination, share exchange or acquisition, in which our stockholders receive cash or the securities of another issuer that are listed on a national securities exchange. “Aggregate invested capital” means the aggregate original issue price paid for the shares of our common stock, before reduction for organization and offering expenses, reduced by any distribution of sale or financing proceeds.

For purposes of this subordinated incentive fee, the “liquidity amount” will be calculated as follows:

 

 

If the business management agreement is terminated pursuant to an internalization in accordance with the transition process set forth in that agreement, the Business Manager, or its successor or designee, will continue to be entitled to receive the subordinated incentive fee, on a prorated basis based on the duration of the Business Manager’s service to us. Specifically, in this case, the Business Manager, or its successor or designee, will be entitled to a fee equal to the product of: (1) the amount of the fee to which the Business Manager otherwise would have been entitled had the agreement not been terminated; and (2) the quotient of the number of days elapsed from the effective date of the agreement through the closing of the internalization, and the number of days elapsed from the effective date of the agreement through the date of the closing of the applicable triggering event.

Real Estate Management Agreement

We have entered into a real estate management agreement with our Real Estate Manager under which our Real Estate Manager and its affiliates manage or oversee each of our real properties. For each property that is managed directly by our Real Estate Manager or its affiliates, we pay the Real Estate Manager a monthly management fee of up to 1.9% of the gross income from any single-tenant, net-leased property, and up to 3.9% of the gross income from any other type of property. The Real Estate Manager determines, in its sole discretion, the amount of the management fee payable in connection with a particular property, subject to these limits. For each property that is managed directly by the Real Estate Manager or its affiliates, we pay the Real Estate Manager a separate leasing fee

66

---

based upon prevailing market rates applicable to the geographic market of that property. If we engage our Real Estate Manager to provide construction management services for a property, we also pay a separate construction management fee based upon prevailing market rates applicable to the geographic market of that property. We also reimburse our Real Estate Manager and its affiliates for property-level expenses that they pay or incur on our behalf, including the salaries, bonuses and benefits of persons performing services for our Real Estate Manager and its affiliates (excluding the executive officers of our Real Estate Manager). For the year ended December 31, 2020, we incurred real estate management fees, construction management fees and leasing fees in an aggregate amount equal to approximately $6.0 million, of which approximately $0.6 million remained unpaid as of December 31, 2020.

Other Fees and Expense Reimbursements

We reimburse the Business Manager, Real Estate Manager and entities affiliated with each of them, such as Inland Real Estate Acquisitions, LLC (“IREA”), Inland Institutional Capital, LLC and their respective affiliates, as well as third parties, for any investment-related expenses they pay in connection with selecting, evaluating or acquiring any investment in real estate assets, regardless of whether we acquire a particular real estate asset, subject to the limits in our charter. Examples of reimbursable expenses include but are not limited to legal fees and expenses, travel and communications expenses, costs of appraisals, accounting fees and expenses, third-party broker or finder’s fees, title insurance expenses, survey expenses, property inspection expenses and other closing costs. We do not reimburse acquisition expenses in connection with an investment in marketable securities, except that we may reimburse expenses incurred on our behalf and payable to a third party, such as third-party brokerage commissions. We did not acquire any properties in 2020 and did not incur any acquisition expenses during the year ended December 31, 2020.

We reimburse IREIC, the Business Manager and their respective affiliates, including the service providers, for any expenses that they pay or incur on our behalf in providing services to us, including all expenses and the costs of salaries and benefits of persons performing services for these entities on our behalf (except for the salaries and benefits of persons who also serve as one of our executive officers or as an executive officer of the Business Manager or its affiliates) and expenses ultimately paid to third parties. Expenses include, but are not limited to: expenses incurred in connection with any sale of assets or any contribution of assets to a joint venture; expenses incurred in connection with any liquidity event; taxes and assessments on income or real property and taxes; premiums and other associated fees for insurance policies including director and officer liability insurance; expenses associated with investor communications including the cost of preparing, printing and mailing annual reports, proxy statements and other reports required by governmental entities; administrative service expenses charged to, or for the benefit of, us by third parties; audit, accounting and legal fees charged to, or for the benefit of, us by third parties; transfer agent and registrar’s fees and charges paid to third parties; and expenses relating to any offices or office facilities maintained solely for our benefit that are separate and distinct from our executive offices. During the year ended December 31, 2020, IREIC, the Business Manager and their respective affiliates incurred on our behalf approximately $1.5 million of these expenses, of which approximately $0.2 million had not been reimbursed by us as of December 31, 2020.

Policies and Procedures with Respect to Related Party Transactions

Our charter generally requires that any transactions between us and IREIC, the Business Manager, the Real Estate Manager, our directors or their affiliates must be approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction. In determining whether to approve or authorize a particular related party transaction, these directors will consider whether the transaction between us and the related party is fair and reasonable to us and has terms and conditions no less favorable to us than those available from unaffiliated third parties. Our charter also requires the terms of the business management agreement with the Business Manager, including the compensation that we agree to pay the Business Manager, to be approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of independent directors, on an annual basis.

In addition, we have adopted a conflicts of interest policy, which prohibits us from engaging in the following types of transactions with IREIC-affiliated entities:

 

 

 

 

This policy does not impact agreements or relationships between us and IREIC and its affiliates, including, for example, agreements with the Business Manager and Real Estate Manager.

67

---

Report of the Independent Directors

The Company’s charter provides that we, the independent directors, report to our stockholders (1) on whether we believe that the policies being followed by the Company are in your best interest as stockholders, and the basis for that determination, and (2) on the fairness of certain related-party transactions specified in the charter that occurred in the most recently completed fiscal year.

The board met fifteen times in 2020. Through these meetings and by analyzing the corresponding meeting materials and engaging in discussions with management, we evaluated the Company’s business and policies and determined that the Company’s policies relating to acquisitions, financings and other transactions are in your best interest as stockholders. Each transaction or other action requiring board approval generally must be approved by a majority of the board. Each transaction or action requiring such approval that the Company engaged in during the preceding fiscal year was, in fact, so approved.

In addition, as detailed above under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” during 2020 the Company engaged in certain transactions with, and paid certain fees and reimbursed certain expenses to, its sponsor, Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation, and affiliates of the sponsor, including the Company’s business manager and real estate manager. Generally, these transactions must be, and in 2020 were, approved by a majority of the Company’s disinterested directors, including a majority of its disinterested independent directors, as being fair and reasonable to the Company and on terms and conditions not less favorable to the Company than those available from unaffiliated third parties. Accordingly, we believe each of these transactions was fair to the Company.

Respectively Submitted,

Lee A. Daniels

Stephen L. Davis

Gwen Henry

Bernard J. Michael

Director Independence

Our business is managed under the direction and oversight of our board. The members of our board are Lee A. Daniels, Stephen L. Davis, Daniel L. Goodwin, Gwen Henry, Bernard J. Michael and Mitchell A. Sabshon. As required by our charter, a majority of our directors must be “independent.” As defined by our charter, an “independent director” is a director who is not, and within the last two years has not been, directly or indirectly associated with our sponsor, Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation (“IREIC” or the “Sponsor”), or the Business Manager by virtue of (1) an ownership of an interest in the Sponsor, Business Manager or any of their affiliates, (2) employment by the Sponsor, Business Manager or any of their affiliates, (3) service as an officer or director of the Sponsor, Business Manager or any of their affiliates, (4) performance of services, other than as a director, for the Company, (5) service as a director or trustee of more than three REITs sponsored by the Sponsor or managed by the Business Manager, or (6) a material business or professional relationship with the Sponsor, Business Manager or any of their affiliates. For purposes of this definition, an indirect affiliation includes circumstances in which a director’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers- or fathers-in-law, sons- or daughters-in-law or brothers- or sisters-in-law have any of the relationships identified in the immediately preceding sentence of this definition with the Company, the Sponsor, the Business Manager or any of their affiliates during the applicable two year period. For purposes of determining whether or not the business or professional relationship is material, the aggregate gross revenue derived by the person from the Company, the Sponsor, the Business Manager and their affiliates will be deemed material per se if it exceeds five percent (5.0%) of the person’s: (i) annual gross revenue, derived from all sources, during either of the prior two years; or (ii) net worth, on a fair market value basis, during the prior two years. The definition of independence from our charter may be found on our website at www.inland-investments.com/inland-income-trust under the “Corporate Governance” tab.

Although our shares are not listed for trading on any national securities exchange, our board has evaluated the independence of our board members according to the director independence standard of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The NYSE standards provide that to qualify as an independent director, among other things, the board of directors must affirmatively determine that the director has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company).

After reviewing any relevant transactions or relationships between each director, or any of his or her family members, and the Company, our management and our independent registered public accounting firm, and considering each director’s direct and indirect association with IREIC, the Business Manager or any of their affiliates, the board has determined that Messrs. Daniels, Davis and Michael and Ms. Henry qualify as independent directors.

The board considered the relationship between AWH Partners, LLC and Inland Private Capital Corporation (IPC), an affiliate of IREIC, and Mr. Michael’s interest in AWH and its affiliated hotel management company. In December 2019, AWH and its affiliates

68

---

completed a transaction pursuant to which an affiliate of AWH agreed to manage a DoubleTree Hotel in downtown Nashville, Tennessee, owned by third-party investors and controlled by an affiliate of IPC, and to provide disposition and construction management services in exchange for negotiated fees customary in the industry. An affiliate of AWH also made a minority equity investment in the hotel. Mr. Michael has only an indirect interest in this transaction through his minority ownership of AWH and its affiliated management company and is not expected to participate directly in the management of the hotel or AWH’s investment in it. AWH and IPC had also considered a possible similar arrangement with respect to three secondary market select-service hotels, and AWH may enter into similar hotel transactions with affiliates of IPC in the future. Given the small size of the Nashville transaction relative to the size of AWH, the size of Mr. Michael’s indirect financial interest and lack of a direct management role, and the fact that the nature and size of future transactions between AWH and IPC, if any, are uncertain and unknown, the board concluded that Mr. Michael has no material relationship with IPC or IREIC and continues to be an independent director of the Company.

Fees to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by KPMG for the audit of our annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, together with fees for audit-related services and tax services rendered by KPMG for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively (Dollar amounts in thousands).

Approval of Services and Fees

Our audit committee has reviewed and approved all of the fees charged by KPMG, and actively monitors the relationship between audit and non-audit services provided by KPMG. The audit committee concluded that all services rendered by KPMG during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, were consistent with maintaining KPMG’s independence. Accordingly, the audit committee has approved all of the services provided by KPMG. As a matter of policy, the Company will not engage its primary independent registered public accounting firm for non-audit services other than “audit-related services,” as defined by the SEC, certain tax services and other permissible non-audit services except as specifically approved by the chairperson of the audit committee and presented to the full committee at its next regular meeting. The Company also follows limits on hiring partners of, and other professionals employed by, KPMG to ensure that the SEC’s auditor independence rules are satisfied.

The audit committee must pre-approve any engagements to render services provided by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and the fees charged for these services including an annual review of audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees and other fees with specific dollar value limits for each category of service. During the year, the audit committee will periodically monitor the levels of fees charged by KPMG and compare these fees to the amounts previously approved. The audit committee also will consider on a case-by-case basis and, if appropriate, approve specific engagements that are not otherwise pre-approved. Any proposed engagement that does not fit within the definition of a pre-approved service may be presented to the chairperson of the audit committee for approval.

 

69

---

Part IV

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The consolidated financial statements of the Company are contained herein on pages 78 – 106 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Financial statement schedule for the year ended December 31, 2020 is submitted herewith.

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Schedule III).

The list of exhibits filed as part of this Annual Report is set forth on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.

The exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.

Refer to Index to Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein on page 75 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

None.

 

 

70

---

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

71

---

72

---

 

73

---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

 

 

74

---

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

Schedules not filed:

All schedules other than the one listed in the Index have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.

 

 

75

---

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes and financial statement schedule III (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

Change in Accounting Principle

 

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of January 1, 2019 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 842, Leases.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Critical Audit Matter

 

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

 

Identification of impairment triggering events for its investment properties held and used

 

The Company assess the carrying values of its respective long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, recoverability of the assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. In order to review its assets for recoverability, the Company considers current market conditions, as well as its intent with respect to the holding or disposing of the asset. Investment properties held and used, net as of December 31, 2020 was $1.047 billion, or 89% of total assets.

 

76

---

We identified the Company’s identification of events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying value of investment properties held and used may not be recoverable as a critical audit matter. Subjective and challenging auditor judgment, as well as knowledge and experience in the industry, was required to evaluate the Company’s identification of indicators of potential impairment. In particular, as part of its evaluation of indicators of potential impairment for investment properties held and used, judgments include 1) the likelihood that an asset will be sold before the end of its previously estimated holding period, and 2) changes in market conditions or other factors.

 

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the Company’s consideration of certain of the individual properties for potential impairment indicators by:

•Inquiring of Company officials and inspecting meeting minutes of the board of directors to evaluate the likelihood

that a property will be sold before the end of its previously estimated useful life.

•Inquiring and obtaining representation from the Company regarding the status and evaluation of any potential

disposal of properties. We corroborated that information with others in the organization who are responsible for, and

have authority over, disposition activities.

•Examining the Company’s analysis of internal financial information for indications of a decrease in the fair value of

the Company’s properties resulting from continued decline in operating performance of the Company’s properties.

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2011.

Chicago, Illinois

March 18, 2021

77

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

78

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

79

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

80

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

81

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

82

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION

Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on August 24, 2011 to acquire and manage a portfolio of commercial real estate investments located in the United States. The Company is primarily focused on acquiring retail properties and targets a portfolio of 100% grocery-anchored properties. The Company has invested in joint ventures and may continue to invest in additional joint ventures or acquire other real estate assets if its management believes the expected returns from those investments exceed that of retail properties. The Company also may invest in real estate-related equity securities of both publicly traded and private real estate companies, as well as commercial mortgage-backed securities.

The Company has no employees. The Company is managed by IREIT Business Manager & Advisor, Inc. (the “Business Manager”), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation (the “Sponsor”), pursuant to a Business Management Agreement with the Business Manager.

On January 16, 2018, the Company effected a 1-for-2.5 reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding common stock whereby every 2.5 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were converted into one share of its common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”). In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), all share information presented has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock Split.

 

On February 11, 2019, the Company’s board of directors approved a strategic plan (the “Strategic Plan”) with the goals of providing future liquidity to investors and creating long-term stockholder value. The Strategic Plan centers around owning a portfolio of 100% grocery-anchored properties with lower exposure to big box retailers. As part of this strategy, the Company’s management team and board have completed the sale of 12 properties in 2019 and three additional properties in January 2020, as further described in Note 4 – “Dispositions,” with the goal of redeploying capital into the acquisition of strategically located grocery-anchored centers. The Company is considering moving toward a liquidity event in the future, market conditions permitting, most likely through a listing on a public securities exchange.

In connection with the Strategic Plan, the Company’s share repurchase program (as amended, the “SRP”) was amended and restated, effective March 21, 2019, and the Business Management Agreement with the Business Manager was amended and restated on February 11, 2019 to, among other things, eliminate all future acquisition and disposition fees. On March 3, 2020, the Company’s SRP was amended and restated (the “Third A&R SRP”), which became effective on April 10, 2020, as further described below in Note 3 – “Equity”. The Strategic Plan may evolve or change over time. For example, the Company may decide to focus more on redeveloping existing properties relative to investing in new grocery-anchored centers, depending on such factors, including, but not limited to, market prices for its properties, availability of capital for redevelopment and construction costs. There is no assurance, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, that the Company will be able to successfully implement the Strategic Plan, including making strategic sales or purchases of properties or listing the Company’s common stock, within the timeframe the Company expected or at all. We expect that no liquidity event will occur before the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy and the retail commercial real estate market subside.

On March 5, 2021, as reported in the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the same date, the Company announced that the Company’s board of directors unanimously approved: (i) an estimated per share net asset value (the “Estimated Per Share NAV”) as of December 31, 2020; (ii) the same per share purchase price for shares issued under the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan (as amended, the “DRP”) beginning with the first  distribution payment to stockholders upon resumption of distributions and the DRP until the Company announces a new Estimated Per Share NAV, and (iii) that, in accordance with the SRP, beginning with repurchases when the Company resumes the SRP and until the Company announces a new Estimated Per Share NAV, any shares accepted for ordinary repurchases and “exceptional repurchases” will be repurchased at 80% of the Estimated Per Share NAV.

Due to the uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and the need to preserve cash for the payment of operating and other expenses, such as debt payments, the Company’s board of directors has suspended distributions, rescinded the first quarter distribution that was previously declared and suspended the Company’s DRP and SRP until further notice. The suspension of the DRP was effective on June 6, 2020 and the suspension of the SRP was effective on June 26, 2020. Any unfulfilled repurchase requests will automatically roll over for processing under the terms and conditions of the SRP when the Company restarts the plan, unless a stockholder withdraws the request for repurchase.

83

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

At December 31, 2020, the Company owned 44 retail properties, totaling 6,469,300 square feet.  The properties are located in 21 states.  At December 31, 2020, the portfolio had a weighted average physical occupancy of 92.8% and economic occupancy of 93.3%.

 

 

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

General

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement, in all material respects, of the financial position and results of operations for the periods are presented. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Information with respect to square footage and occupancy is unaudited.

Significant Risks and Uncertainties related to COVID-19 Pandemic

Currently, one of the most significant risks and uncertainties is the potential further adverse effect of the current pandemic of the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19. A number of our tenants had temporarily closed their stores and requested rent deferral or rent abatement during this pandemic. Many experts acknowledge that the outbreak has already triggered a period of global economic slowdown or a global recession.

The COVID-19 pandemic has already had a material impact on the Company’s operations (See Note 14 – “Leases”) and could continue to have material and adverse effects on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in the near term due to, but not limited to, the following:

The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts the Company’s operations and those of our tenants will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the scope, severity and duration of the pandemic, the actions taken to contain the pandemic or mitigate its impact, and the direct and indirect economic effects of the pandemic and containment measures, among others.

Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, as well as all wholly owned subsidiaries. Wholly owned subsidiaries generally consist of limited liability companies (“LLCs”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Each property is owned by a separate legal entity which maintains its own books and financial records and each entity’s assets are not available to satisfy the liabilities of other affiliated entities.

The fiscal year-end of the Company is December 31.

84

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Partially-Owned Entities

The Company will consolidate the operations of a joint venture if the Company determines that it is either the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (VIE) or has substantial influence and control of the entity.  In instances where the Company determines that it is not the primary beneficiary of a VIE or the Company does not control the joint venture but can exercise influence over the entity with respect to its operations and major decisions, the Company will use the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, the operations of a joint venture will not be consolidated with the Company’s operations but instead its share of operations will be reflected as equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entity on its consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Additionally, the Company’s net investment in the joint venture will be reflected as investment in unconsolidated entity on the consolidated balance sheets.

 

Acquisitions

Upon acquisition of real estate investment properties, the Company allocates the total purchase price of each property that is accounted for as an asset acquisition based on the relative fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on Level 3 inputs, such as comparable sales values, discount rates, capitalization rates, revenue and expense growth rates and lease-up assumptions, from a third party appraisal or other market sources. The acquisition date is the date on which the Company obtains control of the real estate investment property and transaction costs are capitalized.

Assets and liabilities acquired typically include land, building and site improvements and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above market and below market leases and the value of in-place leases. The portion of the purchase price allocated to above market lease values is included in acquired lease intangible assets, net and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease as a reduction to rental income. The portion allocated to below market lease values is included in acquired intangible liabilities, net and is amortized as an increase to rental income over the term of the lease including any renewal periods with fixed rate renewals.  The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired in-place lease value is included in acquired lease intangible assets, net and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the acquired leases’ weighted average remaining term.

The Company determines the fair value of the tangible assets consisting of land and buildings by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and buildings. The Company determines the fair value of assumed debt by calculating the net present value of the mortgage payments using interest rates for debt with similar terms and maturities. Differences between the fair value and the stated value is recorded as a discount or premium and amortized over the remaining term using the effective interest method.

Certain of the Company’s properties included earnout components to the purchase price, meaning the Company did not pay a portion of the purchase price of the property at closing, although the Company owns the entire property. The Company is not obligated to settle the contingent portion of the purchase price unless space which was vacant at the time of acquisition is later leased by the seller within the time limits and parameters set forth in the related acquisition agreements. The Company’s policy is to record earnout components when estimable and probable. At December 31, 2020, there is no earnout liability outstanding.

Impairment of Investment Properties and Equity Method Investments

The Company assesses the carrying values of its respective long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability of the assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. In order to review its assets for recoverability, the Company considers current market conditions, as well as its intent with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. If the Company’s analysis indicates that the carrying value of the long-lived asset is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, the Company recognizes an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the current estimated fair value of the real estate property. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third party appraisals, where considered necessary (Level 3 inputs).

The Company estimates the future undiscounted cash flows based on management’s intent as follows: (i) for real estate properties that the Company intends to hold long-term, including land held for development, properties currently under development and operating buildings, recoverability is assessed based on the estimated future net rental income from operating the property and termination value; and (ii) for real estate properties that the Company intends to sell, including land parcels, properties currently under development and operating buildings, recoverability is assessed based on estimated net proceeds, including net rental income during

85

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

the holding period, from disposition that are estimated based on future net rental income of the property and utilizing expected market capitalization rates.

The use of projected future cash flows is based on assumptions that are consistent with our estimates of future expectations and the strategic plan the Company uses to manage its underlying business. However, assumptions and estimates about future cash flows, including comparable sales values, discount rates, capitalization rates, revenue and expense growth rates and lease-up assumptions which impact the discounted cash flow approach to determining value are complex and subjective. Changes in economic and operating conditions and the Company’s ultimate investment intent that occur subsequent to the impairment analysis could impact these assumptions and result in future impairment charges of real estate properties.

On a quarterly basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the carrying value of the Company’s investment in unconsolidated entities and notes receivable may be other than temporarily impaired as a loss in value that is other than a temporary decline is required to be recognized. Indicators include significant delays in construction, significant costs over budget and financial concerns.  To the extent indicators suggest that a loss in value may have occurred, the Company will evaluate both quantitative and qualitative factors to determine if the loss in value is other than temporary. If a potential loss in value is determined to be other than temporary, the Company will recognize an impairment loss based on the estimated fair value of the investment.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company did not record any impairment charge. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $4,420 which is included in provision for asset impairment on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $9,865 related to its investment in Mainstreet Texas Development Fund, LLC, a joint venture formed to develop three transitional care/rapid recovery centers (“Mainstreet JV”). The Company determined that, as of December 31, 2018, collection of its note receivable from Mainstreet JV is improbable and therefore, recorded an impairment charge of $5,540 to reduce the note receivable balance to zero. Both impairment charges related to Mainstreet JV are included in provision for impairment of investment in and note receivable from unconsolidated entities on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

REIT Status

The Company elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, for federal income tax purposes commencing with the tax year ended December 31, 2013. Commencing with such taxable year, the Company was organized and began operating in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and believes it has so qualified. As a result, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that is distributed to stockholders. A REIT is subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (subject to certain adjustments and excluding any net capital gain) to its stockholders. The Company will monitor the business and transactions that may potentially impact its REIT status. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, without the benefit of certain statutory relief provisions, the Company will be subject to tax as a “C corporation.” Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income, property or net worth and federal income and excise taxes. Any taxable REIT subsidiaries generally will be subject to federal income tax applicable to “C corporations.”

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all demand deposits, money market accounts and all short-term investments with a maturity of three months or less, at the date of purchase, to be cash equivalents.  The account balance may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance coverage and, as a result, there could be a concentration of credit risk related to amounts on deposit in excess of FDIC insurance coverage. The Company believes that the risk will not be significant, as the Company does not anticipate the financial institutions’ non-performance.

Restricted Cash

Amounts included in restricted cash represent those required to be set aside by lenders for real estate taxes, insurance, capital expenditures and tenant improvements on our existing properties. These amounts also include post close escrows for tenant improvements, leasing commissions, master lease, general repairs and maintenance, and are classified as restricted cash on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

86

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets to such amounts shown on the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows:

 

 

Accounts and Rents Receivable

The Company takes into consideration certain factors that require judgments to be made as to the collectability of receivables. Collectability factors taken into consideration are the amounts outstanding and payment history of the tenant. The Company includes both billed and accrued charges in its evaluation of the collectability of a tenant’s receivable balance. For tenant receivables that the Company determines to be uncollectible, the Company records an offset for uncollectable tenant revenues directly to rental income.

Capitalization and Depreciation

Real estate properties held and used are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Real estate properties held for sale are recorded at the lesser of their carrying value or fair value less selling costs. Improvement and betterment costs are capitalized, and ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

Real estate properties are classified as held for sale when the Company concludes that a sale is likely. Criteria that may be considered in this determination include obtaining a signed purchase and sale agreement, the completion and waiving of due diligence by the seller, and the receipt of non-refundable earnest money from the seller.

Cost capitalization and the estimate of useful lives require judgment and include significant estimates that can and do change.  Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. The Company anticipates the estimated useful lives of its assets by class to be generally:

 

 

Depreciation expense was $37,495, $39,304 and $38,040 for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Amortization of leasing fees were $615, $546, and $360 for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

 

Debt Issuance Costs

Debt issuance costs are amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the term, or anticipated repayment date, of the related agreements as a component of interest expense. These costs are reported as a direct deduction to the Company’s outstanding mortgages and credit facility payable.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company has estimated fair value using available market information and valuation methodologies the Company believes to be appropriate for these purposes. Considerable judgment and a high degree of subjectivity are involved in developing these estimates and, accordingly, they are not necessarily indicative of amounts that would be realized upon disposition.

The Company defines fair value based on the price that it believes would be received upon sale of an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company establishes

87

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which are described below:

 

The Company’s cash equivalents, accounts receivable and payables and accrued expenses all approximate fair value due to the short term nature of these financial instruments. The Company’s financial instruments measured on a recurring basis include derivative interest rate instruments.

Derivatives

The Company uses derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, primarily to manage exposure to interest rate risks inherent in variable rate debt. The Company may also enter into forward starting swaps or treasury lock agreements to set the effective interest rate on a planned fixed-rate financing. The Company’s interest rate swaps involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. In a forward starting swap or treasury lock agreement that the Company cash settles in anticipation of a fixed rate financing or refinancing, the Company will receive or pay an amount equal to the present value of future cash flow payments based on the difference between the contract rate and market rate on the settlement date. The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and currently does not have any derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments under the accounting requirements for derivatives and hedging.

Revenue Recognition

The Company commences revenue recognition for its operating leases on the commencement date of the lease, which the Company considers is the date on which it makes the leased space available to the lessee.

The determination of who is the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements determines the nature of the leased asset. If the Company is the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements, then the tenant improvements are capitalized and depreciated over the life of the lease. If the Company concludes it is not the owner, for accounting purposes, of the tenant improvements (the lessee is the owner), then the leased asset is the unimproved space and any tenant improvement allowances funded by the Company under the lease are treated as lease incentives which reduce revenue recognized over the term of the lease. The Company considers a number of different factors to evaluate whether it or the lessee is the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes.

Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of each lease. The difference between rental income earned on a straight-line basis and the cash rent due under the provisions of the lease agreements is recorded as deferred rent receivable and is included as a component of accounts and rent receivable on the consolidated balance sheets. Due to the impact of the straight-line basis, rental income generally will be greater than the cash collected in the early years and will decrease in the later years of a lease.

Reimbursements from tenants for recoverable real estate tax and operating expenses are accrued as revenue in the period the applicable expenses are incurred. The Company makes certain assumptions and judgments in estimating the reimbursements at the end of each reporting period. The Company does not expect the actual results to materially differ from the estimated reimbursement. The Company made the election for these reimbursements, which are non-lease components, to be combined with rental income.

The Company records lease termination income if there is a signed termination agreement, all of the conditions of the agreement have been met and amounts due are considered collectible. Such termination fees are recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining lease term in rental income.

88

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

As a lessor, the Company defers the recognition of contingent rental income, such as percentage rent, until the specified target that triggered the contingent rental income is achieved.

Equity-Based Compensation

The Company has restricted shares and units outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 2019. The Company recognizes expense related to the fair value of equity-based compensation awards as general and administrative expense on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company primarily recognizes expense based on the fair value at the grant date on a straight-line basis over the vesting period representing the requisite service period and adjusts expense for forfeitures as they occur. See Note 8 – "Equity-Based Compensation" for further information.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. Among other things, the guidance eliminated the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness and generally requires the entire change in the fair value of a hedging instrument to be presented in the same income statement line as the hedged item. As ASU 2017-12 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, the Company adopted the ASU on January 1, 2019 with a modified retrospective transition. For cash flow hedges existing at January 1, 2019, the Company eliminated the separate measurement of ineffectiveness by means of a cumulative reversal of recognized hedge ineffectiveness with a credit to the opening balance of accumulated distributions and net loss and a debit to accumulated other comprehensive income of $134 on its consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of equity.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) which amends the guidance in ASC Topic 840, Leases. The Company adopted the lease standard effective January 1, 2019. As a lessor, the Company’s recognition of rental income remained mainly consistent with previous guidance. As a result of the adoption of ASC 842, the Company includes both billed and accrued charges in its quarterly evaluation of the collectability of a tenant’s receivable balance. Prior to the adoption of ASC 842, uncollectible tenant revenues were recorded as bad debt expense in property operating expenses on its consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. For tenant receivables that the Company determines to be uncollectible, the Company now records an offset for uncollectible tenant revenues directly to rental income. Upon adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, a cumulative-effect adjustment of $24 was recognized for uncollectible tenant revenues as a result of this change. The standard’s changes related to capitalized initial direct costs did not impact the Company’s accounting for such costs, because historically, the Company capitalized initial direct costs (commissions) that are still considered capitalizable under the new standard.

As part of its adoption of the lease standard, the Company has elected and qualifies to utilize the practical expedient in ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements, Leases (Topic 842) issued in July 2018, which allows, by class of underlying assets, to not separate non-lease components from the related lease components and, instead, to account for those components as a single lease. This practical expedient for lessors is limited to circumstances in which the non-lease component or components would be accounted for under the new revenue guidance and both (1) the timing and pattern of transfer are the same for the non-lease component(s) and associated lease component and (2) the lease component, if accounted for separately, would be classified as an operating lease.

 

The Company also elected the package of practical expedients in ASU No. 2018-11, which permitted the Company to adopt the new leases standard under a transition method whereby it initially applies the new leases standard at the adoption date and recognizes a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. Therefore, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-02 on its effective date without restating comparative periods and utilized the practical expedients available in the amendment as part of its adoption. The package of practical expedients included relief from re-assessing a lease using the standard’s new definition of a lease, relief from re-assessing the classification of a lease and allowing previously capitalized initial direct costs (see above) to continue to be amortized. The adoption of the package of practical expedients, as a lessor, did not require the Company to recognize a cumulative effect adjustment.

 

For lessees, ASU No. 2016-02 establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. The Company is the lessee of a ground lease. The Company has elected the practical expedient that, for leases that commenced before the effective date, the lessee need not reassess whether the contract is a lease nor reassess lease classification for existing leases. The lease liability for the ground lease was based on the present

89

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

value of the ground lease’s future lease payments using an interest rate which it considers reasonable and within the range of the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. At January 1, 2019, the Company recorded a lease liability of $23,377 and a ROU asset of $15,963 on its consolidated balance sheet. Rental expense for lease payments related to the operating lease will continue to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848). ASU 2020-04 contains practical expedients for reference rate reform related activities that impact debt, leases, derivatives and other contracts. The guidance in ASU 2020-04 is optional and may be elected over time as reference rate reform activities occur. During the first quarter of 2020, the Company has elected to apply the hedge accounting expedients related to probability and the assessments of the effectiveness for future LIBOR-indexed cash flows to assume that the index upon which future hedged transactions will be based matches the index on the corresponding derivatives. Application of these expedients preserves the presentation of derivatives consistent with past presentation. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the guidance and may apply other elections as applicable as additional changes in the market occur.

 

In April 2020, the FASB issued a question-and-answer document (the “Lease Modification Q&A”) focused on the application of lease accounting guidance to lease concessions provided as a result of COVID-19. Under existing lease guidance, the Company would have to determine, on a lease by lease basis, if a lease concession was the result of a new arrangement reached with the tenant (treated with the lease modification accounting framework) or if a lease concession was under the enforceable rights and obligations within the existing lease agreement (precluded from applying the lease modification accounting framework). The Lease Modification Q&A grants relief to entities, allowing them an election to not evaluate whether lease-related relief that lessors provide to mitigate the economic effects of COVID-19 on lessees is a lease modification under Topic 842, Leases. An entity that makes this election can then elect whether to apply the modification guidance (i.e. assume the relief was always contemplated by the contract or assume the relief was not contemplated by the contract). Both lessees and lessors may make this election. The Company has elected to apply such relief and will avail itself of the election to avoid performing a lease by lease analysis.

 

NOTE 3 – EQUITY

The Company commenced an initial public “best efforts” offering (the “Offering”) on October 18, 2012, which concluded on October 16, 2015.  The Company sold 33,534,022 shares of common stock generating gross proceeds of $834,399 from the Offering.  On March 5, 2021, the Company’s board of directors determined an estimated per share NAV of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2020. The previously estimated per share NAV of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2019 was established on March 3, 2020.

The Company provides the following programs to facilitate additional investment in the Company’s shares and to provide limited liquidity for stockholders.

Distribution Reinvestment Plan

On October 19, 2015, the Company registered 25,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued under its distribution reinvestment plan (“DRP”) pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3D. The Company provides stockholders with the option to purchase additional shares from the Company by automatically reinvesting cash distributions through the DRP, subject to certain share ownership restrictions. The Company does not pay any selling commissions or a marketing contribution and due diligence expense allowance in connection with the DRP. Pursuant to the DRP, the price per share for shares of common stock purchased under the DRP is equal to the estimated value of a share, as determined by the Company’s board of directors and reported by the Company from time to time, until the shares become listed for trading, if a listing occurs, assuming that the DRP has not been terminated or suspended in connection with such listing.

Distributions reinvested through the DRP were $4,547, $19,642 and $19,339 for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The DRP was suspended during 2020 as discussed in Note 1 – “Organization.”

Share Repurchase Program

The Company adopted a share repurchase program (as amended, “SRP”) effective October 18, 2012, under which the Company is authorized to purchase shares from stockholders who purchased their shares from the Company or received their shares through a non-cash transfer and who have held their shares for at least one year. Purchases are in the Company’s sole discretion. In the case of

90

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

repurchases made upon the death of a stockholder or qualifying disability (“Exceptional Repurchases”), as defined in the SRP, the one year holding period does not apply. The SRP was amended and restated effective January 1, 2018 to change the processing of repurchase requests from a monthly to a quarterly basis to align with the move to quarterly distributions. On February 11, 2019, the Company’s board of directors adopted a second amended and restated SRP, effective March 21, 2019. On March 3, 2020 the Company’s board of directors adopted the Third A&R SRP. Under the Third A&R SRP, the Company is authorized to make ordinary repurchases and Exceptional Repurchases at a price equal to 80.0% of the “share price,” which is defined in the Third A&R SRP as an amount equal to the lesser of: (A) $25, as adjusted under certain circumstances, including, among other things, if the applicable shares were purchased from the Company at a discounted price; or (B) the most recently disclosed estimated value per share. Prior to the amendment, the Company was authorized to make Exceptional Repurchases at a price equal to 100% of the “share price.”

The Third A&R SRP provides the Company’s board of directors with the discretion to reduce the funding limit for share repurchases.    The Third A&R SRP limits the dollar amount for any repurchases made by the Company each calendar quarter to an amount equal to a percentage determined in the sole discretion of the board on a quarterly basis that will not be less than 50% of the net proceeds from the DRP during the applicable quarter. As the Company’s board of directors has suspended the SRP, there is no current effective limit based on % of the net proceeds from the DRP. See Note 1 – “Organization” for further discussion on the suspension of the SRP. The Company continues to limit the number of shares repurchased during any calendar year to 5% of the number of shares outstanding on December 31st of the previous calendar year, as adjusted for any stock splits or other combinations.

If either or both of the repurchase limitations prevent the Company from repurchasing all of the shares offered for repurchase during a calendar quarter, the Company will repurchase shares, on a pro rata basis within each category below, in accordance with the repurchase limitations in the following order: (a) first, all Exceptional Repurchases and (b) second, all ordinary repurchases. The SRP will immediately terminate if the Company’s shares become listed for trading on a national securities exchange. For any quarter ended, unfulfilled repurchase requests will be included in the list of requests for the following quarter unless the request is withdrawn in accordance with the SRP. However, each stockholder who has submitted a repurchase request must submit an acknowledgment annually after we publish a new estimated value per share acknowledging, among other things, that the stockholder wishes to maintain the request. If we do not receive the acknowledgment prior to the repurchase date, we will deem the request to have been withdrawn.

Repurchases through the SRP were $127, $9,381 and $22,545 for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. At December 31, 2019, the liability related to the SRP was $2,278 recorded in other liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. There was no liability related to the SRP at December 31, 2020 due to the suspension of the SRP. See Note 1 – “Organization” for further discussion on the suspension of the SRP.

 

NOTE 4 – DISPOSITIONS

 

In connection with the Strategic Plan, the Company completed the sale of 12 properties during 2019, generating cash proceeds of $14,872. The Company recognized a gain of $3,279, reflected in gain on sale of investment properties on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

 

The Company also had three additional properties that met the criteria to be classified as held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2019. The criteria was met for these properties because, amongst other criteria, the Company had collected non-refundable earnest money from the seller. For these properties, an impairment charge of $4,420, reflected in provision for asset impairment on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss during the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company completed the sale of the three properties in January 2020, generating proceeds of $37,255 net of selling costs.

 

91

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

The following table reflects the major components of the assets and liabilities associated with investment properties held for sale as of December 31, 2019:

 

 

 

NOTE 5 – INVESTMENT IN AND NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES

 

In August 2017, the Company, through a wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiary, made an equity commitment to Mainstreet JV to develop, construct, lease, finance and sell parcels of land and related building improvements including personal property which were to be operated as rapid recovery healthcare facilities located in Beaumont, Amarillo and Temple, Texas.

 

In conjunction with its equity investment in Mainstreet JV, the Company also agreed to provide subsidiaries of Mainstreet JV mezzanine loans in the aggregate amount of $5,400. The loan term was for 48 months with the Company earning interest at a rate of 14.5% per annum and receiving monthly interest payments based on a 10.5% pay rate. The remaining unpaid interest was to be due at maturity or upon certain defined events. The mezzanine loans were guaranteed by one of the other members of the joint venture. The borrowers could draw on the mezzanine loans as needed in connection with the construction of the rapid recovery healthcare facilities, however, did not draw on the mezzanine loans until the Company had fully funded its equity commitment to Mainstreet JV. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had not loaned any funds related to the mezzanine loans.

 

During 2018, the Company funded its remaining equity commitment to Mainstreet JV, as well as the full $5,400 of mezzanine loans. Subsequently, during 2018, the Company identified several indicators that suggested it was probable that the Company would not recover its equity investment in or the mezzanine loans advanced to Mainstreet JV. Such indicators included construction overruns, loss of a planned tenant and the related cost of re-leasing. Additionally, the construction mortgage lender to Mainstreet JV stopped funding the construction draws for two of the properties and began foreclosure proceedings. As the Company does not intend to fund any more investments in Mainstreet JV and it does not expect to recover any of its previous investments, the Company determined an impairment for both its investment in and notes receivable from Mainstreet JV is appropriate.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded an impairment to its investment in Mainstreet JV of $9,865 and an impairment to its notes receivable from unconsolidated entities of $5,540, both included in provision for impairment of investment in and note receivable from unconsolidated entities on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. Both amounts represent a full impairment of such investments.

 

92

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

NOTE 6 – ACQUIRED INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The following table summarizes the Company’s identified intangible assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2020 and 2019: 

 

 

The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired above market lease value and acquired below market lease value is amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease as an adjustment to rental income. For below market lease values, the amortization period includes any renewal periods with fixed rate renewals. Prior to January 1, 2019, the acquired above market ground lease was amortized on a straight-line basis as an adjustment to property operating expense over the term of the lease and included renewal periods. At date of the adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, the remaining balance of the intangible related to the above market ground lease was derecognized as a cumulative-effect adjustment to establish the operating lease ROU asset.  The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired in-place lease value is amortized on a straight-line basis over the acquired leases’ weighted average remaining term.

Amortization pertaining to acquired in-place lease value, above market ground lease, above market lease value and below market lease value is summarized below:

 

 

93

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Estimated amortization of the respective intangible lease assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2020 for each of the five succeeding years and thereafter is as follows:  

 

 

 

NOTE 7 – DEBT AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had the following mortgages and credit facility payable:

 

 

The Company’s indebtedness bore interest at a weighted average interest rate of 3.76% per annum at December 31, 2020, which includes the effects of interest rate swaps. The Company estimates the fair value of its total debt by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at rates currently offered for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities by the Company’s lenders using Level 3 inputs.  The carrying value of the Company’s debt excluding mortgage premium and unamortized debt issuance costs was $631,017 and $683,936 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and its estimated fair value was $625,751 and $689,790 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

94

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

As of December 31, 2020, scheduled principal payments and maturities on the Company’s debt were as follows:

 

 

Credit Facility Payable

 

The Company’s credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) consisting of a $200,000 revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and a $150,000 term loan (the “Term Loan”) has an accordion feature that allows for an increase in available borrowings up to $700,000, subject to certain conditions.

At December 31, 2020, the Company had $65,000 outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility and $150,000 outstanding under the Term Loan.  At December 31, 2020 the interest rate on the Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan was 2.15% and 4.65%, respectively. The Revolving Credit Facility matures on August 1, 2022, and the Company has the option to extend the maturity date for one additional year subject to the payment of an extension fee and certain other conditions.  The Term Loan matures on August 1, 2023. As of December 31, 2020 the Company had $135,000 available for borrowing under the Revolving Credit Facility, subject to the terms and conditions, including compliance with the covenants, of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement that governs the Credit Facility.

The Company’s performance of the obligations under the Credit Facility, including the payment of any outstanding indebtedness under the Credit Facility, is guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of the Company, including each of the subsidiaries of the Company which owns or leases any of the properties included in the pool of unencumbered properties comprising the borrowing base.  Additional properties will be added to and removed from the pool from time to time to support amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility. At December 31, 2020, there were 25 properties included in the pool of unencumbered properties.

 

The Credit Facility requires compliance with certain covenants, including a minimum tangible net worth requirement, a distribution limitation, restrictions on indebtedness and investment restrictions, as defined. It also contains customary default provisions including the failure to comply with the Company's covenants and the failure to pay when amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility become due. On September 29, 2020, the Company entered into a first amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of August 1, 2018 with KeyBank National Association individually and as administrative agent, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., PNC Capital Markets LLC and Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (now BofA Securities, Inc.) as joint lead arrangers, and other lenders from time to time parties to the agreement. This amendment provides a waiver of the minimum tangible net worth requirement for three consecutive quarters beginning with the quarter ended September 30, 2020. In exchange, our leverage ratio may be increased only to 62.5% (formerly 65%) for two consecutive fiscal quarters two times prior to the facility termination date, the Company is restricted, during this waiver period, from making any share repurchases or distributions without lender approval, a LIBOR floor of 25 basis points will remain in effect for the remainder of the term, and the Company paid a set fee to the arranging bank and all the participating lenders. As of December 31, 2020, the Company is in compliance with all financial covenants related to the Credit Facility as amended.

Gain on early termination of interest rate swap agreements

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded a net gain of $1,151 of which $1,192 was received in cash, related to the early termination of certain interest rate swap agreements that had corresponding early mortgage pay-offs.

95

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company realized a loss on extinguishment of debt on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss of $411 due to the write-off of the unamortized balance of debt issuance costs associated with ten loans that were repaid prior to maturity.

Mortgages Payable

The mortgage loans require compliance with certain covenants, such as debt service ratios, investment restrictions and distribution limitations. As of December 31, 2020, the Company was current on all of its payments and except for two mortgage loans with covenant violations which only required cash maintenance accounts be established for their two mortgaged properties, all other mortgage loans were in compliance with their financial covenants. All of the Company’s mortgage loans are secured by first mortgages on the respective real estate assets. As of December 31, 2020, the weighted average years to maturity for the Company’s mortgages payable was 2.7 years.

Interest Rate Swap Agreements

The Company entered into interest rate swaps to fix certain of its floating LIBOR based debt under variable rate loans to a fixed rate to manage its risk exposure to interest rate fluctuations. The Company will generally match the maturity of the underlying variable rate debt with the maturity date on the interest swap. See Note 15 – "Fair Value Measurements" for further information.

The following table summarizes the Company’s interest rate swap contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2020.

 

 

 

96

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities which eliminated the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the entire change in fair value of the hedging instrument included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness should be recorded in other comprehensive income (OCI). When the amounts recorded in OCI are reclassified to earnings, they should be presented in the same income statement line item as the effect of the hedged item. The table below presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

 

 

The total amount of interest expense presented on the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss was $25,349, $28,305 and $27,137 for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The location of the net gain or loss reclassified into income from accumulated other comprehensive loss is reported in interest expense on the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss.   The amount that is expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income in the next 12 months is $7,314.

 

NOTE 8 – EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION

Under the Company’s Employee and Director Restricted Share Plan (“RSP”), restricted shares and restricted share units generally vest over a one to three year vesting period from the date of the grant, subject to the specific terms of the grant. On June 16, 2020, the Company issued 4,408 restricted shares to our independent directors pursuant to the automatic grant provisions of the RSP, which become vested in equal installments of 33-1/3% on each of the first three anniversaries of June 16, 2020, subject to certain exceptions. In accordance with the RSP, restricted shares were issued to non-employee directors as compensation. Each restricted share and restricted share unit entitles the holder to receive one common share when it vests. Restricted shares and restricted share units are included in common stock outstanding on the date of the vesting. The grant-date value of the restricted shares and restricted share units is amortized over the vesting period representing the requisite service period. Compensation expense associated with the restricted shares and restricted share units issued to the non-employee directors was $68, $53 and $48 in the aggregate, for the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had $67 of unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested restricted shares and restricted share units, in the aggregate. The weighted average remaining period that compensation expense related to unvested restricted shares and restricted share units will be recognized is 1.5 years. The total fair value at the vesting date for restricted shares and restricted share units that vested during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $48, $43 and $30, respectively.

A summary of the Company’s restricted share and restricted share unit activity during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 is as follows:

 

 

97

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

NOTE 9 – INCOME TAX AND DISTRIBUTIONS

 

The Company qualifies as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, for federal income tax purposes. In order to maintain the Company’s status as a REIT, the Company must annually distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, subject to certain adjustments and excluding any net capital gain, to its stockholders. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the Company’s REIT taxable (loss) income was $(11,950) (unaudited), $988 (unaudited) and $9,073 (unaudited), respectively.

 

The Company had no uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2020 or 2019. The Company expects no significant increases or decreases in uncertain tax positions due to changes in tax positions within one year of December 31, 2020. The Company had no interest or penalties relating to income taxes recognized on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 or 2018. As of December 31, 2020, returns for the calendar years 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 remain subject to examination by U.S. and various state and local tax jurisdictions.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded a $15,405 impairment for the Mainstreet JV recorded on its consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company’s investment in Mainstreet JV was held through a taxable REIT subsidiary. Based on an effective tax rate of 28.51%, which is calculated by combining a 21% Federal tax rate and an IL tax rate of 7.51% (9.5% state rate net of the Federal benefit), the deferred tax benefit related to the impairment was approximately $4,400. Since the taxable REIT subsidiary did not conduct any activities outside the investment in Mainstreet JV, management concluded it was not more likely than not that the taxable REIT subsidiary would be able to utilize these losses in future tax periods and recorded a full valuation allowance of $4,400 during the year ended December 31, 2018. The Mainstreet JV was liquidated for income tax purposes in 2019, resulting in a $1,560 reduction in the deferred tax asset and valuation allowance. Since the taxable REIT subsidiary has no other activity, a valuation allowance has been maintained on the remaining $2,840 deferred tax asset. No income tax expense or benefit was recorded during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 or 2018. The taxable REIT subsidiary has $9,931 of capital loss carryforwards that expire in 2024.

 

CARES Act and CAA

On March 27, 2020 and December 27, 2020, the President of the United States signed and enacted into law the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (CAA). Among other provisions, the CARES Act and the CAA provide relief to U.S. federal corporate taxpayers through temporary adjustments to net operating loss rules, changes to limitations on interest expense deductibility, and the acceleration of available refunds for minimum tax credit carryforwards. The CARES Act and the CAA did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

Distributions

In 2020, due to the uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and the need to preserve cash for the payment of operating and other expenses, during the second quarter the Company’s board of directors rescinded the first quarter distribution and suspended distributions until further notice. In 2019, the Company paid quarterly distributions in an amount equal to $0.3018 per share, which represented an annualized rate of 6% based on the previously estimated per share NAV as of December 31, 2018, payable in arrears the following quarter. In 2018, the Company paid quarterly distributions in an amount equal to $0.335 per share, which represented an annualized rate of 6% based on the previously estimated per share NAV as of December 31, 2017, payable in arrears the following quarter.

The table below presents the distributions paid, declared and rescinded for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

 

 

98

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

For federal income tax purposes, distributions may consist of ordinary dividend income, qualified dividend income, non-taxable return of capital, capital gains or a combination thereof. Distributions to the extent of the Company’s current and accumulated earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes are taxable to the recipient as either ordinary dividend income or, if so declared by the Company, qualified dividend income or capital gain dividends. Distributions in excess of these earnings and profits (calculated for income tax purposes) constitute a non-taxable return of capital rather than ordinary dividend income or a capital gain dividend and reduce the recipient’s tax basis in the shares to the extent thereof. Distributions in excess of earnings and profits that reduce a recipient’s tax basis in the shares have the effect of deferring taxation of the amount of the distribution until the sale of the stockholder’s shares. If the recipient's tax basis is reduced to zero, distributions in excess of the aforementioned earnings and profits (calculated for income tax purposes) constitute taxable gain.

The following table sets forth the taxability of distributions on common shares, on a per share basis, paid in 2020, 2019 and 2018:

 

 

NOTE 10 – EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period (the “common shares”). Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the common shares plus common share equivalents. The Company excludes antidilutive restricted shares and units from the calculation of weighted-average shares for diluted EPS. As a result of a net loss for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, 4,287 shares, 2,902 shares and 2,625 shares, respectively, were excluded from the computations of diluted EPS, because they would have been antidilutive.

NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The acquisition of certain of the Company’s properties included an earnout component to the purchase price that was recorded as a deferred investment property acquisition obligation (“Earnout liability”). At December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, there is no earnout liability outstanding.

The table below presents the change in the Company’s Earnout liability for the year ended December 31, 2018:

 

 

The Company may be subject, from time to time, to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes, based on currently available information, that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

NOTE 12 – SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company has one reportable segment, retail real estate, as defined by U.S. GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

99

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

NOTE 13 – TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES

The following table summarizes the Company’s related party transactions for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.  Certain compensation and fees payable to the Business Manager for services provided to the Company are limited to maximum amounts.

 

 

100

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

NOTE 14 –LEASES

The Company is lessor on approximately 700 retail operating leases. The remaining lease terms for the Company’s leases range from less than one year to 17 years. The Company considers the date on which it makes a leased space available to a lessee as the commencement date of the lease. At commencement, the Company determines the lease classification utilizing the classification tests under ASC 842. Options to extend a lease are included in the lease term when it is reasonably certain that the tenant will exercise its option to extend. Termination penalties are included in income when there is a termination agreement, all the conditions of the agreement have been met and amounts due are considered collectible. Such termination fees are recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining lease term in rental income. If an operating lease is modified and the modification is not accounted for as a separate contract, the Company accounts for the modification as if it were a termination of the existing lease and the creation of a new lease.  The Company considers any prepaid or accrued rentals relating to the original lease as part of the lease payments for the modified lease. The Company includes options to modify the original lease term when it is reasonably certain that the tenant will exercise its option to extend.

Lease Income

Most of the revenue from the Company’s properties consists of rents received under long-term operating leases. Most leases require the tenant to pay fixed base rent paid monthly in advance, and to reimburse the Company for the tenant’s pro rata share of certain operating expenses including real estate taxes, special assessments, insurance, utilities, common area maintenance, management fees, and certain building repairs paid by the Company and recoverable under the terms of the lease. Under these leases, the Company pays all expenses and is reimbursed by the tenant for the tenant’s pro rata share of recoverable expenses paid.

 

Certain other tenants are subject to net leases which provide that the tenant is responsible for fixed base rent as well as all costs and expenses associated with occupancy. Under net leases where all expenses are paid directly by the tenant rather than the landlord, such expenses are not included on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Under leases where all expenses are paid by the Company, subject to reimbursement by the tenant, the expenses are included within property operating expenses. As of January 1, 2019, the date on which the Company adopted the new leasing standard, reimbursements for common area maintenance are considered non-lease components that are permitted to be combined with rental income. The combined lease component and reimbursements for insurance and taxes are reported as rental income on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.  

 

Rental income related to the Company's operating leases is comprised of the following for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:

 

 

101

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

The future base rent payments to be received under operating leases including ground leases as of December 31, 2020 for the years indicated, assuming no expiring leases are renewed, are as follows:

 

 

Lease Expense

The Company is the lessee under one ground lease.  The ground lease, which commenced on July 1, 2007, was assumed as part of a property purchased in October 2015 and extends through June 30, 2037 with six 5-year renewal options which the Company assumes will be exercised. When the Company acquired the lease, the Company considered the lease terms and lease classification. As reassessment is not required under practical expedients accorded in ASC 842, the Company will continue to account for the ground lease as an operating lease with an established lease term and payment schedule. At January 1, 2019, the Company recorded a lease liability of $23,377 and a ROU asset of $15,963 on its consolidated balance sheet. The lease liability was based on the present value of the ground lease’s future lease payments using an interest rate of 6.225% which the Company considers reasonable and within the range of the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, total rent expense was $1,944, $1,944 and $1,891, respectively, recorded in property operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

 

Lease payments for the ground lease as of December 31, 2020 for each of the five succeeding years and thereafter is as follows:

 

 

 

The Company is closely monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the collectability of lease payments. As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s accounts and rent receivable, net balance is $21,851, which is net of an allowance for bad debts of $4,638 and includes $4,457 of deferred rent receivable related to COVID-19 agreements negotiated with tenants. Such agreements generally allow tenants to defer the payment of a portion of rent with no substantive changes to the consideration in the original lease. Consistent with the guidance in the Lease Modification Q&A issued by the FASB, such deferrals affect the timing, but not the amount, of the lease payments. The Company is accounting for these deferrals as if no changes to the lease were made. Under this accounting, the Company increases its rent receivable as tenant payments accrue and continues to recognize rental income.

 

 

 

NOTE 15 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair Value Hierarchy

The Company defines fair value based on the price that it believes would be received upon sale of an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company establishes

102

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which are described below:

 

 

The Company has estimated the fair value of its financial and non-financial instruments using available market information and valuation methodologies the Company believes to be appropriate for these purposes.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

For assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the table below presents the fair value of the Company’s cash flow hedges as well as their classification on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

 

 

The fair value of derivative instruments was estimated based on data observed in the forward yield curve which is widely observed in the marketplace. The Company also incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the counterparty's nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements which utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads. The Company has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivative interest rate swap agreements and therefore has classified these in Level 2 of the hierarchy.

Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements

As of December 31, 2019, the Company reviewed the carrying value of three investment properties that met held for sale criteria. The criteria was met for these properties because, amongst other criteria, the Company had collected non-refundable earnest money from the seller. Properties classified as held for sale must be recorded at the lesser of their carrying value or the fair value as of the balance sheet date less selling costs in accordance with GAAP. The fair value of these investment properties, classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, was estimated based on the signed purchase and sale agreements with the seller. All of these properties had a carrying value that exceeded the fair value less selling costs, and therefore, for the year ended December 31, 2019 an impairment loss totaling $4,420 was recorded in provision for asset impairment on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company completed the sale of these properties in January 2020.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company incurred no impairment charges for investment properties or any other non-recurring fair value measurements. For discussion of full impairment reserve recorded for the Company’s investment in the Mainstreet JV and the related notes receivable, please refer to Note 5 – “Investment In and Notes Receivable from Unconsolidated Entities”.

 

 

103

---

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

NOTE 16 – QUARTERLY SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

The following represents the results of operations, for each quarterly period, during 2020 and 2019.

 

 

 

 

 

NOTE 17 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Repayment of mortgages using proceeds from line of credit

On February 1, 2021, the Company drew $38,000 on the Revolving Credit Facility and used the proceeds to repay the maturing mortgage for the Marketplace at El Paseo. On March 1, 2021, the Company repaid the maturing mortgage for Prattville Town Center for $15,930 using a combination of proceeds from a draw on the Revolving Credit Facility and available cash.

Announcement of the Company’s Estimated Per Share NAV

On March 5, 2021, the  Company announced that the Company’s board of directors unanimously approved: (i) an Estimated Per Share NAV as of December 31, 2020; (ii) the same per share purchase price for shares issued under the DRP beginning with the first distribution payment to stockholders upon resumption of distributions and the DRP until the Company announces a new Estimated Per Share NAV, and (iii) that, in accordance with the Third A&R SRP, beginning with repurchases when the Company resumes the SRP and until the Company announces a new Estimated Per Share NAV, any shares accepted for ordinary repurchases and Exceptional Repurchases will be repurchased at 80% of the Estimated Per Share NAV.

 

 

104

---

 

 

INLAND REAL ESTATE INCOME TRUST, INC.

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2020

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

 

105

---

 

 

Notes:

 

 

 

 

 

106