Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32 - CERTIFICATION - CALA CORP | ccaa_ex32.htm |
EX-31 - CERTIFICATION - CALA CORP | ccaa_ex31.htm |
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _____________ TO ______________
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-15109
CALA CORPORATION |
(Exact name of Company as Specified in Its Charter) |
Oklahoma |
73-1251800 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) |
(I.R.S. Employer or Organization Identification No.) | |
|
||
701 North Post Oak Road, Suite 615 Houston TX |
77024 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
(Zip Code) |
Company’s telephone number: (713) 380-5147
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.005 Par Value
Indicate by check mark whether the Company (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to file such reports), and (2) been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No x.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Company’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K o.
Indicate by check mark whether the Company is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer |
¨ |
Accelerated filed |
¨ |
Non-accelerated filer |
¨ |
Smaller reporting company |
x |
|
|
Emerging Growth Company |
x |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the Company is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No ¨.
The Company’s revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 was zero. The aggregate number of shares of voting stock held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2017 was 181,795,519 with no market value as the shares had ceased trading. As of April 16, 2018, the Company had 334,866,147 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
3 |
| ||
3 |
| ||
6 |
| ||
6 |
| ||
6 |
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
7 |
| |
8 |
| ||
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
8 |
| |
Item 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
| |
F-1 |
| ||
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
9 |
| |
9 |
| ||
10 |
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
11 |
| ||
12 |
| ||
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
13 |
| |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence |
13 |
| |
14 |
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
15 |
| ||
|
| ||
16 |
|
2 |
Table of Contents |
Cala Corporation was incorporated on June 13, 1985 under the laws of the State of Oklahoma. The Company’s sole industry segment was the business of owning, operating, licensing and joint venturing restaurants. The Company discontinued this line of business on December 31, 2006. Currently, the Company intends to build an underwater resort and casino. Over the next twelve months, the Company plans to secure $25 million to begin construction on the first vessel. As of the date of this filing none of the financing has been secured.
The Undersea Resort was the idea of Joe Cala, CEO of Cala Corporation. On November 1988, while swimming offshore from Maui, he was surrounded by humpback whales. It was the most profound divine encounter that he ever experienced. From that point forward, he committed himself to developing the Undersea Resort. Integral to the design is the installation of large windows below sea level which look out to the undersea habitat.
Since 2007, the company has generated no revenues. The company has an accumulated deficit of $17,081,888 as of December 31, 2017, and anticipates generating losses for the next twelve months. As of December 31, 2017, the company had cash and cash equivalents of $987. The company will need to raise capital to pay the auditors, accountant, attorney and transfer agent. The company has been unable to obtain such financing or any financing to begin any projects. To address this concern, the independent public accounting firm has issued an audit opinion, which includes a statement that the results of our operations and our financial condition raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Risk Factors Connected with Plan of Operation.
(a) Limited Prior Operations, History of Operating Losses, and Accumulated Deficit May Affect Ability of Company to Survive.
The Company has had limited prior operations to date. Since the Company’s principal activities recently have been limited to seeking new business ventures, it has no recent record of any revenue-producing operations. Consequently, there is only a limited operating history upon which to base an assumption that the Company will be able to achieve its business plans. In addition, the Company has no assets. As a result, there can be no assurance that the Company will generate significant revenues in the future; and there can be no assurance that the Company will operate at a profitable level. Accordingly, the Company’s prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered in connection with the establishment of a new business.
As a result of the fixed nature of many of the Company’s expenses, the Company may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected delays in the development and marketing of the Company’s products or any capital raising or revenue shortfall. Any such delays or shortfalls will have an immediate adverse impact on the Company’s business, operations and financial condition.
(b) Need for Additional Financing May Affect Operations and Plan of Business.
The working capital requirements associated with any adopted plan of business of the Company may be significant. The Company anticipates, based on currently proposed assumptions relating to its operations (including with respect to costs and expenditures and projected cash flow from operations), that it must seek financing to continue its operations (an amount which is as yet to be determined). However, such financing, when needed, may not be available, or on terms acceptable to management. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on additional sources of capital and the success of the Company’s business plan.
3 |
Table of Contents |
If funding is insufficient at any time in the future, the Company may not be able to take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, or may be required to reduce the scope of its planned product development and marketing efforts, any of which could have a negative impact on its business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, insufficient funding may have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition, which could require the company to:
|
· | curtail operations significantly; |
|
|
|
|
· | seek arrangements with strategic partners or other parties that may require the company to relinquish significant rights to products, technologies or markets; or |
|
|
|
|
· | explore other strategic alternatives including a merger or sale of the company. To the extent that the Company raises additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities will result in dilution to existing stockholders. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, these securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to holders of common stock and the terms of such debt could impose restrictions on the Company’s operations. Regardless of whether the Company’s cash assets prove to be inadequate to meet the Company’s operational needs, the Company may seek to compensate providers of services by issuance of stock in lieu of cash, which will also result in dilution to existing shareholders. |
(c) Loss of Current Management Could Have Adverse Impact on Business and Prospects for Company.
The Company’s success is dependent upon the hiring and retention of key personnel. None of the officers or directors has any employment or non-competition agreement with the Company. Therefore, there can be no assurance that these personnel will remain employed by the Company. Should any of these individuals cease to be affiliated with the Company for any reason before qualified replacements could be found, there could be material adverse effects on the Company’s business and prospects.
In addition, all decisions with respect to the management of the Company will be made exclusively by the officers and directors of the Company. Investors will only have rights associated with stockholders to make decisions which affect the Company. The success of the Company, to a large extent, will depend on the quality of the directors and officers of the Company. Accordingly, no person should invest in the shares unless he is willing to entrust all aspects of the management of the Company to the officers and directors.
(d) Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Ability of Officers and Directors to Make Decisions in the Best Interests of Company.
The officers and directors have other interests to which they devote time, either individually or through partnerships and corporations in which they have an interest, hold an office, or serve on boards of directors, and each will continue to do so notwithstanding the fact that management time may be necessary to the business of the Company. As a result, certain conflicts of interest may exist between the Company and its officers and/or directors which may not be susceptible to resolution.
In addition, conflicts of interest may arise in the area of corporate opportunities which cannot be resolved through arm’s length negotiations. All of the potential conflicts of interest will be resolved only through exercise by the directors of such judgment as is consistent with their fiduciary duties to the Company. It is the intention of management, so as to minimize any potential conflicts of interest, to present first to the board of directors to the Company, any proposed investments for its evaluation.
4 |
Table of Contents |
(e) Limitations on Liability, and Indemnification, of Directors and Officers May Result in Expenditures by Company.
The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation contain provisions to eliminate, to the fullest extent permitted by the Oklahoma Corporation Law, as in effect from time to time, the personal liability of directors of the Company for monetary damages arising from a breach of their fiduciary duties as directors. The Certificate of Incorporation and the Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company include provisions to the effect that the Company may, to the maximum extent permitted from time to time under applicable law, indemnify any director, officer, or employee to the extent that such indemnification and advancement of expense is permitted under such law, as it may from time to time be in effect. Any limitation on the liability of any director, or indemnification of directors, officer, or employees, could result in substantial expenditures being made by the Company in covering any liability of such persons or in indemnifying them.
(f) Absence of Cash Dividends May Affect Investment Value of Company’s Stock.
The board of directors does not anticipate paying cash dividends on the common stock for the foreseeable future and intends to retain any future earnings to finance the growth of the Company’s business. Payment of dividends, if any, will depend, among other factors, on earnings, capital requirements and the general operating and financial conditions of the Company as well as legal limitations on the payment of dividends out of paid-in capital.
(g) Non-Cumulative Voting May Affect Ability of Some Shareholders to Influence Mangement of Company.
Holders of the shares of common stock of the Company are not entitled to accumulate their votes for the election of directors or otherwise. Accordingly, the holders of a majority of the shares present at a meeting of shareholders will be able to elect all of the directors of the Company, and the minority shareholders will not be able to elect a representative to the Company’s board of directors.
(h) No Assurance of Continued Public Trading Market and Risk of Low Priced Securities May Affect Market Value of Company’s Stock.
There has been only a limited public market for the common stock of the Company. The Company’s common stock was listed on the National Quotation Bureaus’ Pink Sheets (now known as Pink Sheets LLC), under the symbol “CCAA”. On October 17, 2016 the Company was notified of delisting due to lack of current reporting. On March 6, 2017 the trading activity was revoked by the SEC.
(i) Failure to Maintain Market Makers May Affect Value of Company’s Stock.
If the Company is unable to maintain a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority member broker/dealers as market makers, the liquidity of the common stock could be impaired, not only in the number of shares of common stock which could be bought and sold, but also through possible delays in the timing of transactions, and lower prices for the common stock than might otherwise prevail. Furthermore, the lack of market makers could result in persons being unable to buy or sell shares of the common stock on any secondary market. There can be no assurance the Company will be able to maintain such market makers.
(j) Sale of Shares Eligible For Future Sale Could Adversely Affect the Market Price.
5 |
Table of Contents |
All of the shares of common stock that are currently held, directly or indirectly, by significant shareholders of the Company as shown in the chart under Part III, Item 11 of this Form 10-K, have been issued in reliance on the private placement exemption under the Securities Act of 1933. Such shares will not be available for sale in the open market without separate registration except in reliance upon Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933. In general, under Rule 144 a person, or persons whose shares are aggregated, who has beneficially owned shares acquired in a non-public transaction for at least one year, including persons who may be deemed affiliates of the Company, as defined, would be entitled to sell within any three-month period a number of shares that does not exceed 1% of the then outstanding shares of common stock, provided that current public information is then available. If a substantial number of the shares owned by these shareholders were sold under Rule 144 or a registered offering, the market price of the common stock could be adversely affected.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.
The Company maintains an office at 701 North Post Oak Road, Suite 615, Houston TX 77024. The Company does not own any equipment and the location is provided rent free by the CEO.
On January 20, 2009, a complaint was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of California (case # CIVWS09-0049) terminating the lease at 500 Bollinger Canyon Way, San Roman, CA due to subleasing the premises without consent of the landlord. A judgment was entered giving the landlord possession of the premises with no monetary amount awarded.
On February 18, 2009 the Company received a letter demanding payment on the deficiencies of 2 notes totaling $125,000 the Company had issued. Subsequent to this an action was originated in the District Court of Jefferson County Texas (case # A-183,766). The Plaintiff contends the Company had not paid the principal or interest on promissory notes issued in 2004. In 2005 the Company issued stock of 3,400,000 and 2,500,000 shares to the plaintiff in full payment of the outstanding notes and interest to the plaintiff. The Company and principal shareholder has agreed to a judgment of $176,667 plus attorney’s fees of $25,000. On October 27, 2011 the judgement for cause $183,766 was lodged and entered by the court making the judgement effective as of that date.
The Company and its principal stockholder has agreed to a judgment in Harris Court Texas District Court (Cause# 2011-36988) with the plaintiff of the case to pay the plaintiff $115,000 plus legal costs of $5,000. The settlement calls for a $50,000 payment on January 12, 2012 plus payments of $2,000 per month thereafter none of which have been made. As of this date the judgment has not been signed by the plaintiff’s, attorney or the judge presiding over the case so actual liability cannot yet be determine. Until the order is entered the judgment is not in effect and could change.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company has accrued $321,667 for the legal liabilities.
On March 6, 2017, under Release number 80157, the Company’s securities registration was revoked by the Commission for failure to timely file periodic reports under in violation of the Exchange Act Section 13(a) and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. The Company had not filed since the 10-k filed for the year ending December 31, 2013. Since that date, the Company has filed a Form – 10 for December 31, 2015 and 2016.
A Desist and Refrain Order was issued by the State of California Department of Corporations against Joseph Cala and Cala Corp. on March 28, 2012 prohibiting Joseph Cala or Cala Corp. from selling securities in the State of California. This order resulted from a complaint made by an individual who made a loan to Cala Corp. for the office building purchased by the Company in Titusville, Florida. Due to the financial restraints of the Company at the time, and the costs associated with defending against the action, the Company elected not to fight the order and allowed the order to become final. The order remains in full force and effect until further order of the California Corporations Commissioner.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFTEY DISCLOSURE
Not Applicable
6 |
Table of Contents |
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Market Information.
The Company’s common stock was listed on the National Quotation Bureaus’ Pink Sheets (now known as Pink Sheets LLC), under the symbol “CCAA”. On October 17, 2016 the Company was notified of delisting due to lack of current reporting. On March 6, 2017 the trading activity was revoked by the SEC. The range of closing prices shown below is as reported by this market. The quotations shown reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
Per Share Common Stock Bid Prices by Quarter (1)
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
| ||
Quarter Ended December 31, 2017 |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
| ||
Quarter Ended September 30, 2017 |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
| ||
Quarter Ended June 30, 2017 |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
| ||
Quarter Ended March 31, 2017 |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
| ||
Quarter Ended December 31, 2016 |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
| ||
Quarter Ended September 30, 2016 |
|
|
0.0030 |
|
|
|
0.0020 |
|
Quarter Ended June 30, 2016 |
|
|
0.0040 |
|
|
|
0.0016 |
|
Quarter Ended March 31, 2016 |
|
|
0.0040 |
|
|
|
0.0021 |
|
1) The Company’s common stock only traded sporadically during this fiscal year
Holders of Common Equity
As of December 31, 2017, the Company had approximately 515 shareholders of record.
Dividend Information
The Company has not declared or paid a cash dividend to stockholders since it was incorporated. The Board of Directors presently intends to retain any earnings to finance Company operations and does not expect to authorize cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will depend upon the Company’s earnings, capital requirements and other factors.
Sales of Unregistered Securities
On February 2, 2017, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock to two individuals for cash of $20,000.
On May 20, 2017, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to a related party for cash of $5,000.
7 |
Table of Contents |
ITEM 6: SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not Applicable
ITEM 7: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
When used in this Form 10-K, the words “anticipated”, “estimate”, “expect”, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions including the possibility that the Company will fail to generate projected revenues. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected.
The following discussion of the financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company and related notes included therein.
The Company incurred General and Administrative expenses of $338,871 for the year ending 2017 and $313,427 for the year ending 2016. Officers salary of $300,000 was the major component of G&A during the years ended 2017 and 2016. The compensation was accrued but not paid.
Other expense totaled $20,548 for the period ended December 31, 2017 compared to $18,417 for the same period in 2016 The amount in each period was interest of $20,548 for the year ended December 31, 2017 and $18,417 for the same period in 2016 on a $60,000 note that is in default.
The Company has incurred net losses: $359,419 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 and $331,844 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. The Company’s current liabilities exceed its current assets by $3,567,316 as of December 31, 2017 and $3,232,897 as of December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2017, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $17,081,888.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s most significant change in liquidity or capital resources has been receipts of proceeds from stock offerings and advances by an officer and director. Further, there exist no agreements or understandings with regard to loan agreements by or with the Officers, Directors, principals, affiliates or shareholders of the Company.
The net cash used in operating activities was $21,250 for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to net cash used of $13,013 for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $22,237 for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the net cash provided was $13,013 for the same period ending December 31, 2016. Financing activities for the period ending December 31, 2017 was higher due to the sale of stock for cash of $25,000. The Company, as shown in the accompanying balance sheets, has nominal assets and an accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company has not established any source of revenue to cover its operating costs. These factors raise substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company will engage in very limited activities that must be satisfied in cash until a source of funding is secured. If the Company is unable to obtain revenue producing contracts or financing or if the revenue or financing it does obtain is insufficient to cover any operating losses it may incur, it may substantially curtail or terminate its operations or seek other business opportunities through strategic alliances, acquisitions or other arrangements that may dilute the interests of existing stockholders.
8 |
Table of Contents |
Need for Additional Financing
The Company’s existing capital may not be sufficient to meet the Company’s cash needs, including the costs of compliance with the continuing reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Capital Expenditures
None
ITEM 9: CHANGE IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND DISCLOSURE
None
ITEM 9A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
For purposes of this section, the term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”) (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective because of the identification of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting which are identified below, which we view as an integral part of our disclosure controls and procedures.
9 |
Table of Contents |
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate due to change in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework version 2013. Based on its evaluation, our management concluded that there are material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. We lack full time personnel in accounting and financial staff to sufficiently monitor and process financial transactions in an efficient and timely manner. Our history of losses has severely limited our budget to hire and train enough accounting and financial personnel needed to adequately provide this function. Consequently, we lacked sufficient technical expertise, reporting standards and written policies and procedures. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
This Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting because the attestation report requirement has been removed for “smaller reporting companies” under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2011.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
We have not made any changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Form 10-K that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
None
10 |
Table of Contents |
The name, age, and respective position of the directors and executive officer of the Company are set forth below. The director named below will serve until the next annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders or until his successors are duly elected and have qualified. Directors are elected for a term until the next annual stockholders’ meeting. Officers will hold their positions at the will of the board of directors, absent any employment agreement, of which none currently exist or are contemplated. There are no arrangements, agreements or understandings between non-management shareholders and management under which non-management shareholders may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of the Company’s affairs. There are no other promoters or control persons of the Company. There are no legal proceedings involving the directors of the Company.
Director and Executive Officer.
Joseph Cala, 56, Director, Chairman and CEO
Mr. Cala has been an international business owner most of his professional life. He began his career at an early age rising to top management positions in some of the most prestigious and luxurious resorts in the world. Mr. Cala, as Chairman & CEO of Cala Corporation has been involved in various ventures such as: Fila Sportswear USA; Mondi Fashions, USA; L’Italiano Restaurants and Weddings in California, Hawaii and Japan, Cala Hotels, Inc. dba Undersea Resort; and Hydrogen Future, Inc.
Larry S. Pfautsch, 66, Director
Mr. Pfautsch is Vice President of Corporate Communications for American Century Investments, a $100 billion asset manager based in Kansas City, Mo. Previously, Mr. Pfautsch was a Partner and Senior Vice President with the international communications and public relations firm of Fleishman Hillard, Inc., where he was a member of the financial communications, investor relations, and corporate reputation management practice groups. He began his career as a newspaper reporter and editor and later worked in corporate communications for a major building materials retailer. He is a U.S. Army veteran and a longtime member of the International Association of Business Communicators.
Mark Hofius, 54, Director
Mark Hofius is an engineer for over 25 years but works both in upper management and engineering at the same time. Mark does both mechanical and industrial electrical engineering from fully automated systems to military equipment. Mark has worked in public companies to small family owned companies. Mark is very creative by nature and has several patents. Mark currently owns an engineering consulting firm where he does industrial electrical and Mechanical design work from plastic molding to fully automated equipment. Mark experience in management ranges from president, plant manager, and director levels for both private and public companies.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act.
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of any class of the Company’s equity securities to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Executive officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than 10% of any class of the Company’s equity securities are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company under Rule 16a-3(d) during fiscal 2002, and certain written representations from executive officers and directors, the Company is unaware of any required reports that have not been timely filed.
11 |
Table of Contents |
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
Annual compensation |
|
|
Long-term compensation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Payouts |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Name and principal position |
|
Year |
|
Salary
($)(2) |
|
|
Bonus
($) |
|
|
Other annual compensation
($) |
|
|
Restricted
stock award(s) ($) |
|
|
Securities
under- lying options/ SARs (#) |
|
|
LTIP
payouts ($) |
|
|
All other
compen- sation ($) |
| |||||||
Joseph Cala,(1) |
|
2017 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
President |
|
2016 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larry S. Pfautsch, |
|
2017 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Director |
|
2016 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Hofius, |
|
2017 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Director |
|
2016 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
(1) Mr Cala was appointed a director and president in 1999.
(2) Accrued but not paid
There are no annuity, pension or retirement benefits proposed to be paid to officers, directors, or employees of the Company in the event of retirement at normal retirement date as there is no existing plan provided for or contributed to by the Company. In addition, no remuneration is proposed to be paid in the future, directly or indirectly, by the Company to any officer or director since there is no existing plan as of December 31, 2017 which provides for such payment.
12 |
Table of Contents |
ITEM 12: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2017 (334,866,147 issued and outstanding) by (i) all stockholders known to the Company to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; and (ii) all officers and directors of the Company, individually and as a group (each person has sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to all of the shares shown as beneficially owned by them):
Title of Class |
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Owner |
|
|
Percent of Class |
||||
Common Stock |
|
|
Joseph Cala 1314 Texas Street Houston, TX 77002 |
|
|
123,567,793 |
|
|
|
36.90 | % | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Common Stock |
|
|
Larry Pfautsch 1314 Texas Street Houston, TX 77002 |
|
|
15,500,000 |
|
|
|
4.60 | % | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Common Stock |
|
|
Mark Hofius (2) 1314 Texas Street Houston, TX 77002 |
|
|
18,257,315 |
|
|
|
5.50 | % | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Common Stock |
|
|
Shares of all directors and executive officers as a group (3 person) |
|
|
157,325,108 |
|
|
|
46.98 | % |
(1) None of these security holders has the right to acquire any amount of the shares within sixty days from options, warrants, rights, conversion privilege, or similar obligations.
(2) Mr. Hofius holds 18,257,315 shares directly and 245,520 shares are held by his family.
ITEM 13: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
Other than as set forth below, during the last two fiscal years there have not been any transaction that have occurred between the Company and its officers, directors, and five percent or greater shareholders.
None
13 |
Table of Contents |
ITEM 14: PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Accountant Fees
The following table presents for each of the last two fiscal years the aggregate fees billed in connection with the audits of our financial statements and other professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm, MaloneBailey LLP., Certified Public Accountants and Consultants.
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
| ||
Audit fees |
|
$ | 16,800 |
|
|
$ | 10,000 |
|
Audit related fees |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Tax fees |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
All other fees |
|
$ | - |
|
|
$ | - |
|
Audit fees represent the professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our financial statements included in quarterly reports, along with services normally provided by the accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. Audit-related fees represent professional services rendered for assurance and related services by the accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements that are not reported under audit fees.
Tax fees represent professional services rendered by the accounting firm for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. All other fees represent fees billed for products and services provided by the accounting firm, other than the services reported for in the other categories.
Audit Committee.
The Company does not have an audit committee.
14 |
Table of Contents |
ITEM 15 EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
Exhibits
Exhibits included or incorporated by reference herein are set forth under the Exhibit Index.
Reports on Form 8-K.
15 |
Table of Contents |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Cala Corporation | |||
Dated: April 16, 2018 | By: | /s/ Joseph Cala | |
Joseph Cala, President |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the date indicated:
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|||
/s/ Joseph Cala |
|
President (principal financial and accounting officer)/Director |
|
April 16, 2018 |
Joseph Cala |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark Hofius |
|
Director |
|
April 16, 2018 |
Mark Hofius |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Larry Pfautsch |
|
Director |
|
April 16, 2018 |
Larry Pfautsch |
|
|
|
|
16 |
Table of Contents |
F-1 |
Table of Contents |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Cala Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Cala Corporation, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Going Concern Matter
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP
www.malonebailey.com
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.
Houston, Texas
April 16, 2018
F-2 |
Table of Contents |
CALA CORPORATION
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, |
| |||||
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
| ||
ASSETS |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash in trust account |
|
$ | 987 |
|
|
$ | -- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ | 987 |
|
|
$ | -- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expense |
|
$ | 156,183 |
|
|
$ | 127,987 |
|
Advances – related party |
|
|
185,254 |
|
|
|
178,044 |
|
Officer salary payable |
|
|
2,833,600 |
|
|
|
2,533,600 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
11,599 |
|
|
|
11,599 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
Contingent liabilities |
|
|
321,667 |
|
|
|
321,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3,568,303 |
|
|
|
3,232,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.005 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized issued and outstanding 334,866,147 and 329,866,147, respectively: |
|
|
1,674,329 |
|
|
|
1,649,329 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
11,840,859 |
|
|
|
11,840,859 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(17,081,888 | ) |
|
|
(16,722,469 | ) |
Treasury stock -156,533 shares at cost |
|
|
(616 | ) |
|
|
(616 | ) |
Total stockholders’ deficit |
|
|
(3,567,316 | ) |
|
|
(3,232,897 | ) |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit |
|
$ | 987 |
|
|
$ | -- |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part to the financial statements
F-3 |
Table of Contents |
CALA CORPORATION
|
|
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
| |||||
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
| ||
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
General and administrative expense |
|
|
338,871 |
|
|
|
313,427 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
338,871 |
|
|
|
313,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(338,871 | ) |
|
|
(313,427 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(20,548 | ) |
|
|
(18,417 | ) |
Total other expense |
|
|
(20,548 | ) |
|
|
(18,417 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ | (359,419 | ) |
|
$ | (331,844 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share-basic and diluted |
|
$ | (0.00 | ) |
|
$ | (0.00 | ) |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding-basic and diluted |
|
|
334,118,202 |
|
|
|
329,384,958 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part to the financial statements
F-4 |
Table of Contents |
CALA CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid In |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Stockholders’ |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Deficit |
| |||||||
Balance at December 31, 2015 |
|
|
327,866,147 |
|
|
$ | 1,639,329 |
|
|
$ | 11,849,259 |
|
|
$ | (16,390,625 | ) |
|
|
(56,533 | ) |
|
$ | (1,116 | ) |
|
$ | (2,903,153 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock returned to treasury |
|
|
(100,000 | ) |
|
|
(500 | ) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(100,000 | ) |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Common stock issued for service |
|
|
2,100,000 |
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
(8,400 | ) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(331,844 | ) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(331,844 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2016 |
|
|
329,866,147 |
|
|
|
1,649,329 |
|
|
|
11,840,859 |
|
|
|
(16,722,469 | ) |
|
|
(156,533 | ) |
|
|
(616 | ) |
|
|
(3,232,897 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issue for cash |
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(359,419 | ) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(359,419 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
|
|
334,866,147 |
|
|
$ | 1,674,329 |
|
|
$ | 11,840,859 |
|
|
$ | (17,081,888 | ) |
|
|
(156,533 | ) |
|
$ | (616 | ) |
|
$ | (3,567,316 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements
F-5 |
Table of Contents |
CALA CORPORATION
|
|
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
| |||||
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
| ||
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net loss |
|
$ | (359,419 | ) |
|
$ | (331,844 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued for services |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
38,169 |
|
|
|
16,731 |
|
Officer salary payable |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(21,250 | ) |
|
|
(13,013 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of common stock |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Repayments on related party advances |
|
|
(2,763 | ) |
|
|
-- |
|
Proceeds from related party advances |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
13,013 |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
22,237 |
|
|
|
13,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN CASH |
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AT BEGINNING OF YEAR |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AT END OF YEAR |
|
$ | 987 |
|
|
$ | -- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ | -- |
|
|
$ | -- |
|
Income tax |
|
$ | -- |
|
|
$ | -- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock returned to treasury |
|
$ | -- |
|
|
$ | 500 |
|
Payment of expenses by related party on behalf of the Company |
|
$ | 9,973 |
|
|
$ | -- |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements
F-6 |
Table of Contents |
CALA CORPORATION
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016
NOTE 1: DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Cala Corporation was incorporated on June 13, 1985 under the laws of the State of Oklahoma. The Company’s sole industry segment was the business of owning, operating, licensing and joint venturing restaurants. The Company discontinued this line of business on December 31, 2006. The Company intends to build an underwater resort but has been unable to secure the financing necessary to begin construction on such a facility. It is considering other businesses which may align with the Company’s objectives.
NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying audited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for years presented have been reflected herein.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation to employees and non-employees in accordance with ASC 718 requiring employee equity awards to be accounted for under the fair value method. Accordingly, share-based compensation is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite employee service period. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation to other than employees in accordance with ASC 505-50. Equity instruments issued to other than employees are valued at the earlier of a commitment date or upon completion of the services, based on the fair value of the equity instruments and is recognized as expense over the service period. The Company estimates the fair value of share-based payments using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for common stock options and the closing price of the company’s common stock for common share issuances.
Cash and cash equivalents
For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Property, Equipment and Intangible Assets
Property and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Additions are capitalized, and maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Intangible assets consist of acquired customer and vendor databases and are carried at cost, less accumulated amortization.
Depreciation and amortization is provided principally on the straight-line basis method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to be recovered. The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which it does not consider realization of such assets to be more likely than not.
F-7 |
Table of Contents |
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share
The Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, "Earnings per Share." Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to basic earnings (loss) per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.
Estimates and Assumptions
Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of the assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported expenses. Actual results could vary from the estimates that were assumed in preparing these financial statements.
Fair value of financial instruments
The Company adopted ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”), for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. ASC 820 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to existing generally accepted accounting principles that require the use of fair value measurements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. The adoption of ASC 820 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or operating results, but did expand certain disclosures.
ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, ASC 820 requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized below:
Level 1: |
Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities | |
Level 2: |
Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data | |
Level 3: |
Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the use of the reporting entity’s own assumptions. |
The Company analyzes all financial instruments with features of both liabilities and equity under the FASB’s accounting standard for such instruments. Under this standard, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Depending on the product and the terms of the transaction, the fair value of notes payable and derivative liabilities were modeled using a series of techniques, including closed-form analytic formula, such as the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
Related Party
The Company follows ASC 850, “Related Party Disclosures,” for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flow.
NOTE 3: GOING CONCERN
The Company’s financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern that contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company, as shown in the accompanying balance sheets, has nominal assets and an accumulated deficit and working capital deficit. The Company has not established any source of revenue to cover its operating costs. These factors raise substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company will engage in very limited activities that must be satisfied in cash until a source of funding is secured. If the Company is unable to obtain revenue producing contracts or financing or if the revenue or financing it does obtain is insufficient to cover any operating losses it may incur, it may substantially curtail or terminate its operations or seek other business opportunities through strategic alliances, acquisitions or other arrangements that may dilute the interests of existing stockholders. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
F-8 |
Table of Contents |
NOTE 4: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the years ended December 2017 and 2016, the Company accrued $300,000 each year for salary payable to an officer of the Company; resulting in an outstanding balance of $2,833,600 and $2,533,600 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, an officer advanced additional funds of $9,973 to the Company for debt reduction and operating expenses and was repaid $2,763 for an outstanding advance related party balance of $185,254. During the year ended December 31, 2016 an officer advanced the Company $13,013 for an outstanding related party balance of $178,044 as of December 31, 2016. The balances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.
On May 20, 2017, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to a related party for cash of $5,000.
The Company maintains an office at 701 North Post Oak Road, Suite 615, Houston TX 77024 and the location is provided rent free by the CEO.
NOTE 5: EQUITY
On September 8, 2016, the Company issued 2,100,000 shares of common stock to three individuals at $0.001 per share with a value of $2,100 for services.
During the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company received 100,000 shares of common stock back to treasury at $0.005 per share with a value of $500.
On February 2, 2017, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock to two individuals for cash of $20,000.
On May 20, 2017, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to a related party for cash of $5,000.
NOTE 6: COMMITMENTS & CONTINGENCIES
On January 9, 2006, the Company entered into a lease at 3160 Danville Blvd. Suite A, Alamo, CA consisting of 4,500 square feet for a restaurant. The duration of the lease was 10 years with a renewable option for 5 more years. The monthly rent on the space is $8,500 plus taxes and common area charges. Monthly rental may be adjusted on an annual basis. On August 1, 2006, the Company assigned the lease to a non-affiliated third party, but the Company remained liable for the lease until it terminated on January 8, 2016. The lease expired by January 9, 2016. The Company does not have any further obligation.
On April 10, 2006, the Company entered into a lease consisting of approximately 2,450 square feet for a restaurant at 500 Bollinger Canyon Way, Roman CA. The duration of the lease was for 10 years. On August 1, 2006, the Company discontinued its operations in the restaurant business. As a result, the Company assigned the lease to a non-affiliated third party on a sub-lease basis. The Company was fully obligated to the terms of this lease. However, the nonaffiliated party assumed all payments. Under the terms of the agreement, the sub-lessee paid the monthly lease of $5,400 per month for the duration of the lease plus an additional 60 equal monthly installments of $1,500 to the Company. The sublease terminated payment of the $1,500 in August 2008. The lease expired April 10, 2016. The Company does not have any further obligations.
F-9 |
Table of Contents |
NOTE 7: NOTE PAYABLE
In January 2007, the Company issued a note for $60,000 bearing interest at 11% on the principal and accrued interest compounding monthly. As of December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, the outstanding principle balance of the note was $60,000 and had accrued interest of $138,115 and $117,567, respectively. The note including principal and interest is in default and still outstanding.
NOTE 8: INCOME TAXES
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had a federal net operating loss carry forward of approximately $14,277,387 and $14,217,968 respectively.
The 2017 Act reduces the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. For net operating losses (NOLs) arising after December 31, 2017, the 2017 Act limits a taxpayer’s ability to utilize NOL carryforwards to 80% of taxable income. In addition, NOLs arising after 2017 can be carried forward indefinitely, but carryback is generally prohibited. NOLs generated in tax years beginning before January 1, 2018 will not be subject to the taxable income limitation. The 2017 Act would generally eliminate the carryback of all NOLs arising in a tax year ending after 2017 and instead would permit all such NOLs to be carried forward indefinitely
Components of net deferred tax assets, including a valuation allowance, are as follows at December 31:
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
| ||
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net operating loss carry forward |
|
$ | 2,988,555 |
|
|
$ | 4,969,779 |
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
2,988,555 |
|
|
|
4,969,779 |
|
Less: Valuation Allowance |
|
|
(2,988,555 | ) |
|
|
(4,969,779 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Tax Assets |
|
$ | - |
|
|
$ | - |
|
The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $2,998,555 and $4,969,779, respectively. In assessing the recovery of the deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversals of future deferred tax assets, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As a result, management determined it was more likely than not the deferred tax assets would not be realized as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, accordingly, recorded a full valuation allowance.
F-10 |
Table of Contents |
As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s tax years from December 31, 2007 through the year ended December 31, 2017 remain subject to examination by Federal jurisdictions.
NOTE 9: LEGAL MATTERS
On January 20, 2009, a complaint was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of California (case # CIVWS09-0049) terminating the lease at 500 Bollinger Canyon Way, San Roman, CA due to subleasing the premises without consent of the landlord. A judgment was entered giving the landlord possession of the premises with no monetary amount awarded.
On February 18, 2009, the Company received a letter demanding payment on the deficiencies of 2 notes totaling $125,000 issued by the Company. Subsequent to this an action was originated in the District Court of Jefferson County Texas (case # A-183,766). The Plaintiff contends the Company had not paid the principal or interest on promissory notes issued in 2004. In 2005 the Company issued stock of 3,400,000 and 2,500,000 shares to the plaintiff in full payment of the outstanding notes and interest to the plaintiff. The Company and principal shareholder has agreed to a judgment of $176,667 plus attorney’s fees of $25,000. On October 27, 2011 the judgment for cause $183,766 was lodged and entered by the court making the judgment effective as of that date.
The Company and its principal stockholder has agreed to a judgment in Harris Court Texas District Court (Cause# 2010-36988) with the plaintiff of the case to pay the plaintiff $115,000 plus legal costs of $5,000. The settlement calls for a $50,000 payment on January 12, 2012 plus payments of $2,000 per month thereafter. No payments have been made to date. As of this date the judgment has not been signed by the plaintiff attorney or the judge presiding over the case so actual liability is hard to determine.
As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company has accrued $321,667 for the legal liabilities.
A Desist and Refrain Order was issued by the State of California Department of Corporations against Joseph Cala and Cala Corp. on March 28, 2012 prohibiting Joseph Cala or Cala Corp. from selling securities in the State of California. This order resulted from a complaint made by an individual who made a loan to Cala Corp. for the office building purchased by the Company in Titusville, Florida. Due to the financial restraints of the Company at the time, and the costs associated with defending against the action, the Company elected not to fight the order and allowed the order to become final. The order remains in full force and effect until further order of the California Corporations Commissioner.
F-11 |
Table of Contents |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Number |
|
Description |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Joseph Cala (filed herewith). | |
|
17 |