Attached files

file filename
EX-5.1 - EXHIBIT 5.1 - Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corps002175x2_ex5-1.htm
EX-10.1 - EXHIBIT 10.1 - Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corps002175x2_ex10-1.htm
EX-3.1 - EXHIBIT 3.1 - Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corps002175x2_ex3-1.htm
EX-1.2 - EXHIBIT 1.2 - Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corps002175x2_ex1-2.htm
EX-1.1 - EXHIBIT 1.1 - Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corps002175x2_ex1-1.htm
8-K - FORM 8-K - Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corps002175x2_8k.htm

Exhibit 8.1
 
 
April 5, 2018

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation
301 Harper Drive, Suite 110
Moorestown, NJ  08057

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation
Qualification as
Real Estate Investment Trust

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have acted as tax counsel to Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), in connection with the offer and sale from time-to-time of up to $35,000,000 in aggregate sales price of the Company’s Series A preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) pursuant to a prospectus supplement dated April 5, 2018 (the “Prospectus Supplement”) to a prospectus dated November 22, 2017 (the “Prospectus”) forming part of the registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-221725), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on November 22, 2017 (the “Registration Statement”) with respect to the common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”), the preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (the “Preferred Stock”), warrants entitling the holders to purchase Common Stock or Preferred Stock, rights entitling the holders to purchase Common Stock or Preferred Stock and units comprising two or more of the preceding securities of the Company, to be offered from time to time. You have requested our opinion regarding certain U.S. federal income tax matters.

In giving this opinion letter, we have examined the following:

1.
the Registration Statement; the Prospectus and the Prospectus Supplement;

2.
the Company’s Articles of Amendment and Restatement, dated as of June 3, 2013, and the Articles Supplementary relating to the Series A Preferred Stock;

3.
the Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cherry Hill Operating Partnership, LP, dated as of April 25, 2013, as amended through the date hereof (the “Operating Partnership Agreement”);

4.
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017; and

5.
such other documents as we have deemed necessary or appropriate for purposes of this opinion.
 
 
Vinson & Elkins LLP  Attorneys at Law
Austin  Beijing  Dallas  Dubai  Hong Kong  Houston  London  Moscow  New York
Palo Alto  Richmond  Riyadh  San Francisco  Taipei  Tokyo  Washington
901 East Byrd Street, Suite 1500
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Tel +1.804-327-6300  Fax +1.804-327-6301  www.velaw.com
 

In connection with the opinions rendered below, we have assumed, with your consent, that:

1.
each of the documents referred to above has been duly authorized, executed, and delivered; is authentic, if an original, or is accurate, if a copy; and has not been amended;

2.
during its taxable year ending December 31, 2018 and future taxable years, the Company has operated and will operate in a manner that will make the factual representations contained in a certificate, dated the date hereof and executed by a duly appointed officer of the Company (the “Officer’s Certificate”), true for such years;

3.
the Company will not make any amendments to its organizational documents after the date of this opinion that would affect the Company’s qualification as a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) for any taxable year; and

4.
no action will be taken by the Company after the date hereof that would have the effect of altering the facts upon which the opinions set forth below are based.

In connection with the opinions rendered below, we also have relied upon the correctness of the factual representations contained in the Officer’s Certificate and the factual matters discussed in the Prospectus that relate to the Company’s status as a REIT.  We are not aware of any facts that are inconsistent with the representations contained in the Officer’s Certificate.  Where the factual representations in the Officer’s Certificate involve terms defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the Treasury regulations thereunder (the “Regulations”), published rulings of the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”), or other relevant authority, we have reviewed with the individual making such representations the relevant provisions of the Code, the applicable Regulations, the published rulings of the Service, and other relevant authority.

Based solely on the documents and assumptions set forth above, the representations set forth in the Officer’s Certificate, and the factual matters discussed in the Prospectus under the caption “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” and in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 filed with the SEC on March 16, 2018 under the caption “Additional Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” (which are incorporated herein by reference), we are of the opinion that:

(a)          the Company qualified to be taxed as a REIT pursuant to sections 856 through 860 of the Code for its taxable years ended December 31, 2013 through December 31, 2017, and the Company’s organization and current and proposed method of operation will enable it to qualify as a REIT under the Code for its taxable year ending December 31, 2018 and thereafter; and

(b)          the descriptions of the law and the legal conclusions contained in (i) the Prospectus under the caption “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” and (ii) the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 filed with the SEC on March 16, 2018 under the caption “Additional Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” are correct in all material respects.

2

We will not review on a continuing basis the Company’s compliance with the documents or assumptions set forth above, or the representations set forth in the Officer’s Certificate.  Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the actual results of the Company’s operations for any given taxable year will satisfy the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT.  Although we have made such inquiries and performed such investigations as we have deemed necessary to fulfill our professional responsibilities as counsel, we have not undertaken an independent investigation of all the facts referred to in this opinion letter or the Officer’s Certificate.

          The foregoing opinions are based on current provisions of the Code, the Regulations, published administrative interpretations thereof, and published court decisions.  The Service has not issued Regulations or administrative interpretations with respect to various provisions of the Code relating to REIT qualification.  No assurance can be given that the law will not change in a way that will prevent the Company from qualifying as a REIT.

The foregoing opinions are limited to the U.S. federal income tax matters addressed herein, and no other opinions are rendered with respect to other U.S. federal tax matters or to any issues arising under the tax laws of any other country, or any state or locality.  We undertake no obligation to update the opinions expressed herein after the date of this letter.  This opinion letter speaks only as of the date hereof.  Except as provided in the next paragraph, this opinion letter may not be distributed, quoted in whole or in part or otherwise reproduced in any document, or filed with any governmental agency without our express written consent.

We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to Vinson & Elkins LLP under the captions “Material Federal Income Tax Considerations” and “Legal Matters” in the Prospectus and under the caption “Legal Matters” in the Prospectus Supplement. In giving consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required by Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations promulgated there under by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 
Very truly yours,
   
 
/s/ Vinson & Elkins LLP
   
 
Vinson & Elkins LLP

 
3