Attached files

file filename
EX-99.1 - EXHIBIT 99.1 - Resource REIT, Inc.consent-duffphelps2018xex9.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - Resource REIT, Inc.rreoii-20171231xex322.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - Resource REIT, Inc.rreoii-20171231xex321.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Resource REIT, Inc.rreoii-20171231xex312.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Resource REIT, Inc.rreoii-20171231xex311.htm
EX-23.1 - EXHIBIT 23.1 - Resource REIT, Inc.consent2018-gtex231.htm
EX-21.1 - EXHIBIT 21.1 - Resource REIT, Inc.rreoii-20171231xex211.htm
EX-10.7 - EXHIBIT 10.7 - Resource REIT, Inc.renewaladvisoryagreement-e.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549 

FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
þ
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission file number 000-55430
reitseclogoa12.jpg
Resource Real Estate Opportunity REIT II, Inc.   
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
 
80-0854717
(State or other jurisdiction of
 
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
 
Identification No.)
 
1845 Walnut Street, 18th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(215) 231-7050
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
 
Name of exchange on which registered
None
 
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.1 per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(a) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
o
 
Accelerated filer
o

Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
þ
 
 
 
Emerging growth company
þ
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ
There is no established market for the registrant’s shares of common stock.  On March 28, 2018, the board of directors of the Registrant approved an estimated value per share of the Registrant’s common stock of $9.08. For a full description of the methodologies used to calculate the Registrant’s estimated value per share as of December 31, 2017, see Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities - Market Information.” There were 59,879,085 shares of common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2017, the last day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter. As of March 23, 2018, there were 61,185,365 outstanding shares of common stock of Resource Real Estate Opportunity REIT II, Inc. Registrant incorporates by reference portions of the Resource Real Estate Opportunity REIT II, Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of Part III).



RESOURCE REAL ESTATE OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.
INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT
ON FORM 10-K

 
 
PAGE
 
 
PART I
 
 
  Item 1.
  Item 1A.
  Item 1B.
  Item 2.
  Item 3.
  Item 4.
 
 
 
PART II
 
 
  Item 5.
  Item 6
  Item 7.
  Item 7A.
  Item 8.
  Item 9.
  Item 9A.
  Item 9B.
 
 
 
PART III
 
 
  Item 10.
  Item 11.
  Item 12.
 57
  Item 13.
  Item 14.
 
 
 
PART IV.
 
 
  Item 15.
 
 
 





Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements.  Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts.  In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expects,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “should,” “will” and “would” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.  Such statements are subject to the risks and uncertainties more particularly described in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially.  Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof.  We undertake no obligation to publicly revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report, except as may be required under applicable law.





PART I

ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
General
Resource Real Estate Opportunity REIT II, Inc. is a Maryland corporation that was formed on September 28, 2012. As used herein, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Resource Real Estate Opportunity REIT II, Inc. and, as required by context RRE Opportunity OP II, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, and to its subsidiaries. We focus primarily on acquiring underperforming or distressed real estate and real estate loans. We elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, and to operate as a REIT beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2014. Our objective is to invest in multifamily assets across the entire spectrum of investments in order to provide stockholders with growing cash flow and increasing asset values.
As of December 31, 2017, we owned 18 multifamily properties, as described further in “Item 2. Properties”. We intend to continue to purchase and manage a diversified portfolio of U.S. commercial real estate and real estate-related debt, including properties that, when acquired, may benefit from extensive renovations that may increase their long-term values.
We are externally managed by Resource Real Estate Opportunity Advisor II, LLC, which we refer to as our Advisor, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Resource America, Inc., or RAI. RAI is a wholly-owned subsidiary of C-III Capital Partners, LLC ("C-III"), a leading commercial real estate services company engaged in a broad range of activities. C-III controls our Advisor and Resource Real Estate Opportunity Manager II, LLC, our property manager (our “Manager”). C-III also controls all of the shares of common stock held by RAI and our Advisor. To provide its services, the Advisor draws upon RAI, its management team and their collective investment experience.

Our Offerings
On February 6, 2014, our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-184476), covering a public offering of up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock in our primary offering and 10,000,000 shares of common stock under our distribution reinvestment plan, was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). We retained Resource Securities, LLC, an affiliate of our Advisor, as the dealer manager for our offering. We offered up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock in our primary offering at an aggregate offering price of up to $1.0 billion, or $10 per share with discounts available to certain categories of purchasers. We are also offering up to 10,000,000 shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan at a purchase price equal to $8.63 per share ($8.65 per share prior to March 30, 2017). We terminated the primary portion of our initial public offering on February 6, 2016. We continue to offer shares to our existing stockholders pursuant our distribution reinvestment plan.
Our Business Strategy
Our business strategy has a particular focus on multifamily assets, although we may also purchase interests in other types of commercial property assets consistent with our investment objectives. We have acquired or may acquire (i) underperforming multifamily rental properties which we will renovate and stabilize in order to increase rents, (ii) distressed real estate owned by financial institutions, usually as a result of foreclosure, and non-performing or distressed loans, including first- and second-priority mortgage loans and other loans which we will resolve, and (iii) performing loans, including first- and second-priority mortgage loans and other loans we originate or purchases either directly or with a co-investor or joint venture partner. We believe multiple opportunities exist within the multifamily industry today and will continue to present themselves over the next few years to real estate investors who possess the following characteristics: (i) extensive experience in multifamily investing, (ii) strong management platforms specializing in operational and financial performance optimization, (iii) financial sophistication allowing them to benefit from complex opportunities and (iv) the overall scale and breadth of a national real estate platform in both the equity and debt markets. We seek to utilize our sponsor's dedicated multifamily investing and lending relationships to take advantage of the full range of opportunities across the entire multifamily spectrum of investments. We may make adjustments to our target portfolio based on real estate market conditions and investment opportunities. We will not forego a good investment because it does not precisely fit our expected portfolio composition. Thus, to the extent that our Advisor, presents us with investment opportunities that allow us to meet the requirements to be treated as a REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Internal Revenue Code"), and to maintain our exclusion from regulation as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, our portfolio composition may vary from what we initially expect.

3



Our Operating Policies and Strategies
Our Advisor has the primary responsibility for the selection of investments, the negotiation of the acquisition of these investments, and financing, asset-management and disposition decisions. A majority of our Board of Directors and a majority of the Conflicts Committee, which includes only our three independent directors, approve certain significant proposed real estate property investments and real estate-related debt investments. Our Board of Directors meets regularly to monitor the execution of our investment strategies and our progress in achieving our investment objectives.
We may use leverage for our acquisitions in the form of both REIT level financing and individual investment financing. Such financing, both at the REIT level and at the individual investment level, may also be obtained from the seller of an investment. Although there is no limit on the amount we can borrow to acquire a single real estate investment, we may not leverage our assets with debt financing such that our total liabilities exceed 75% of the aggregate cost of our assets unless a majority of our Conflicts Committee finds substantial justification for borrowing a greater amount.
Our Advisor and our Property Manager
Our Advisor manages our day-to-day operations and our portfolio of real estate investments, and provides asset management, marketing, investor relations, and other administrative services on our behalf, all subject to the supervision of our Board of Directors. Our Advisor has invested approximately $1.3 million in us and as of December 31, 2017 it owned 136,739 shares of our common stock and 50,000 shares of our convertible stock. Under certain circumstances, the convertible shares may be converted into shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2017 our Advisor has granted 19,968 shares of its convertible stock to employees of RAI and its subsidiaries and affiliates. The shares granted vest ratably over three years; 13,572 of the shares have vested as of December 31, 2017.
We have a management agreement with Resource Real Estate Opportunity Manager II, LLC, an affiliate of our Advisor, or our Manager, to provide property management services, as applicable, for most, if not all, of the properties or other real estate related assets we acquire, provided our Advisor is able to control the operational management of such acquisitions. Our Manager may subcontract with an affiliate or third party to provide day-to-day property management, construction management and/or other property specific functions as applicable for the properties it manages.
Resource Property Management, LLC, d/b/a “Resource Residential,” an affiliate of RAI, is a property management company. Resource Residential is a subsidiary of US Residential Group LLC ("USRG"), a Dallas-based property manager that is a wholly owned subsidiary of C-III, the parent of our sponsor. Our Manager has subcontracted with Resource Residential to manage most of the real estate assets that we own. The senior managers and employees of Resource Residential, acting through our Manager, assist in providing property management as well as construction management services to us.
Competition
We believe that the current market for properties that meet our investment objectives is extremely competitive and many of our competitors have greater resources than we do. We believe that our multifamily communities are suitable for their intended purposes and adequately covered by insurance. There are a number of comparable properties located in the same submarkets that may compete with them. We compete with numerous other entities engaged in real estate investment activities, including individuals, corporations, banks and insurance company investment accounts, other REITs, real estate limited partnerships, the U.S. Government and other entities, to acquire, manage and sell real estate properties and real estate related assets. Many of our competitors enjoy significant competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating efficiencies. In addition, the number of entities and the amount of funds competing for suitable investments may increase.
Environmental
As an owner of real estate, we are subject to various environmental laws of federal, state and local governments. Compliance with existing laws has not had a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, and management does not believe it will have such an impact in the future. However, we cannot predict the impact of unforeseen environmental contingencies or new or changed laws or regulations on properties in which we hold an interest, or on properties that may be acquired directly or indirectly in the future.

4



Employees and Economic Dependency
We have no paid employees. The employees of our Advisor or its affiliates provide management, acquisition, advisory and certain administrative services for us. We are dependent on our Advisor and its affiliates for certain services that are essential to us, including the identification, evaluation, negotiation, purchase and disposition of properties and other investments; management of the daily operations of our portfolio; and other general and administrative responsibilities. In the event that these affiliated companies are unable to provide the respective services, we will be required to obtain such services from other sources.
Access to Company Information
We electronically file our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The public may read and copy any of the reports that are filed with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at (800)-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.
We make available free of charge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports on our website, www.resourcereit2.com, or by responding to requests addressed to our investor relations group. These reports are available as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed or furnished to the SEC.
ITEM 1A.     RISK FACTORS

Below are some of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face but do represent those risks and uncertainties that we believe are material to our business, operating results, prospects, and financial condition. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also harm our business.

Risks Related to an Investment in Us
There is no public trading market for your shares; therefore, it will be difficult for you to sell your shares.
There is no current established public market for our shares and our charter does not require our directors to seek stockholder approval to liquidate our assets by a specified date nor list our shares on an exchange by a specified date. Our charter limits your ability to transfer or sell your shares unless the prospective stockholder meets the applicable suitability and minimum purchase standards. Our charter also prohibits the ownership of more than 9.8% of our stock, unless exempted by our board of directors, which may inhibit large investors from desiring to purchase your shares. Moreover, our share redemption program includes numerous restrictions that limit your ability to sell your shares to us, and our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate our share redemption program upon 30 days’ notice without stockholder approval. Therefore, it will be difficult for you to sell your shares promptly or at all. If you are able to sell your shares, you would likely have to sell them at a substantial discount to their public offering price. It is also likely that your shares would not be accepted as the primary collateral for a loan.
If we are unable to find suitable investments, we may not be able to achieve our investment objectives or pay distributions.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to pay distributions depends upon the performance of our Advisor, in the acquisition of our investments, including the determination of any financing arrangements. Competition from competing entities may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to us or increase the bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell. A lack of available debt could result in a further reduction of suitable investment opportunities and create a competitive advantage to other entities that have greater financial resources than we do. We are also subject to competition in seeking to acquire real estate-related debt investments. We can give no assurance that our Advisor will be successful in obtaining suitable investments on financially attractive terms or that, if our advisor makes investments on our behalf, our objectives will be achieved.

5



Because we are dependent upon our Advisor and its affiliates to conduct our operations, any adverse changes in the financial health of our Advisor or its affiliates or our relationship with them could hinder our operating performance and the return on our stockholders’ investment.
We are dependent on our Advisor to manage our operations and our portfolio of real estate assets. Our Advisor has no prior operating history and it depends largely upon the fees and other compensation that it receives from us in connection with the purchase, management and sale of assets to conduct its operations. Any adverse changes in the financial condition of our Advisor or our relationship with our Advisor could hinder its ability to successfully manage our operations and our portfolio of investments.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to conduct our operations is dependent upon the performance of our Advisor, which is a subsidiary of our sponsor and its parent company, RAI. Our sponsor’s business is sensitive to trends in the general economy, as well as the commercial real estate and credit markets. To the extent that any decline in our sponsor’s revenues and operating results impacts the performance of our Advisor, our results of operations, and financial condition could also suffer.
The loss of or the inability to hire additional or replacement key real estate and debt finance professionals by our Advisor could delay or hinder implementation of our investment strategies, which could limit our ability to make distributions and decrease the value of your investment.
We believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon our Advisor, and its affiliates’ ability to retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing professionals. Competition for such professionals is intense, and our Advisor and its affiliates may be unsuccessful in attracting and retaining such skilled individuals. If our Advisor loses or is unable to obtain the services of highly skilled professionals, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered and the value of your investment may decline.
If we make distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operations, we will have less funds available for the acquisition of properties, your overall return may be reduced and the value of a share of our common stock may be diluted.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, we paid distributions of $34.6 million. We funded 100% of these distributions with proceeds from debt financing. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we paid distributions of $35.8 million. We funded 100% of these distributions from both cash flows from operations and proceeds from debt financing. We will declare distributions when our board of directors determines we have sufficient cash flow. Our board of directors considers many factors before authorizing a cash distribution, including current and projected cash flow from operations, capital expenditure needs, general financial conditions and REIT qualification requirements. We expect to have little, if any, cash flow from operations available for cash distributions until we have executed our value-add strategy for a substantial portion of our investments. It is therefore likely that from time to time during our operational stage, our board will declare cash distributions that will be paid in advance of our receipt of cash flow that we expect to receive during a later period. In these instances, where we do not have sufficient cash flow to cover our distributions, we expect to use the proceeds from borrowings or asset sales to pay distributions. We may borrow funds or sell assets to make and cover our declared distributions, all or a portion of which could be deemed a return of capital. We may also fund such distributions from third-party borrowings or from advances from our Advisor or sponsor or from our Advisor’s deferral of its asset management fee. If we fund cash distributions from borrowings, sales of assets or the net proceeds from securities issuances, we will have less funds available for the acquisition of real estate and real estate-related assets and your overall return may be reduced. Further, to the extent cash distributions exceed cash flow from operations, a stockholder’s basis in our stock will be reduced and, to the extent distributions exceed a stockholder’s basis, the stockholder may recognize capital gain. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of distributions we can fund from sources other than from cash flows from operations.
The value of a share of our common stock has been diluted as a result of our payment of stock distributions and will be further diluted if we make additional stock distributions.

We have issued stock distributions to our stockholders and may issue additional stock distributions in the future. We seek to purchase assets that may have limited operating cash flows. While our objective is to acquire assets that appreciate in value, there can be no assurance that assets we acquire will appreciate in value. Therefore, investors who purchased shares early in our offering, as compared with later investors, received more shares for the same cash investment as a result of any stock distributions. Because they own more shares, upon a sale or liquidation of the company, these early investors will receive more sales proceeds or liquidating distributions relative to their invested capital compared to later investors. Furthermore, unless our assets appreciate in an amount sufficient to offset the dilutive effect of the prior stock distributions, the value per share for investors who purchased our stock later in the offering will be below the value per share of earlier investors.

6



Future interest rate increases in response to inflation may inhibit our ability to conduct our business and acquire or dispose of real property or real estate-related debt investments at attractive prices and your overall return may be reduced.

While we expect a significant amount of our leases to be short term multi-family leases that are not impacted by inflation, we will be exposed to inflation risk with respect to income from any long-term leases on real property and from related real estate debt investments as these may constitute a source of our cash flows from operations. High inflation may in the future tighten credit and increase prices. Further, if interest rates rise, such as during an inflationary period, the cost of acquisition capital to purchasers may also rise, which could adversely impact our ability to dispose of our assets at attractive sales prices. Should we be required to acquire, hold or dispose of our assets during a period of inflation, our overall return may be reduced.
Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to recover claims against our directors and officers are limited, which could reduce your and our recovery against them if they negligently cause us to incur losses.
Maryland law provides that a director has no liability in that capacity if he performs his duties in good faith, in a manner he reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. Our charter provides that our directors and officers will not be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages and that we will generally indemnify them for losses unless our directors are negligent or engage in misconduct or our independent directors are grossly negligent or engage in willful misconduct. As a result, you and we may have more limited rights against our directors and officers than might otherwise exist under common law, which could reduce our and your recovery from these persons if they act in a negligent manner. Our charter also requires us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, to indemnify and, without requiring a preliminary determination of the ultimate entitlement to indemnification, pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of the final disposition of a proceeding to any individual who is a present or former director or officer and who is made or threatened to be made a party to the proceeding by reason of his or her service in that capacity or any individual who, while a director or officer and at our request, serves or has served as a director, officer, partner, member, manager or trustee of another corporation, partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, employment benefit plan or other enterprise and who is made or threatened to be made a party to the proceeding by reason of his or her service in that capacity.
We may change our targeted investments, our policies and our operations without stockholder consent.
We expect to invest in multifamily rental properties, and debt or securities secured by multifamily rental properties, but we may also invest a relatively small portion of our proceeds in other real estate asset classes throughout the United States. Also, we are not restricted as to the following:
where we may acquire real estate investments in the United States;
the percentage of our proceeds that may be invested in properties as compared with the percentage of our portfolio that we may invest in real estate-related debt investments or mortgage loans, each of which may be leveraged and will have differing risks and profit potential; or
the percentage of our portfolio that may be invested in any one real estate investment (the greater the percentage of our subscription proceeds invested in one asset, the greater the potential adverse effect on us if that asset is unprofitable).
Though this is our current target portfolio, we may make adjustments to our target portfolio based on real estate market conditions and investment opportunities, and we may change our targeted investments and investment guidelines at any time without the consent of our stockholders, which could result in our making investments that are different from, and possibly riskier than, the investments described in this prospectus. A change in our targeted investments or investment guidelines could adversely affect the value of our common stock and our ability to make distributions to you.
Our board of directors determines our major policies, including our policies regarding financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification and distributions. Our board of directors may amend or revise these and other policies without a vote of the stockholders. Under Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter, our stockholders have a right to vote only on limited matters. Our board’s broad discretion in setting policies and our stockholders’ inability to exert control over those policies increases the uncertainty and risks you face as a stockholder.
Because the offering price in our distribution reinvestment plan offering exceeds our net tangible book value per share, investors in the offering will experience immediate dilution in the net tangible book value of their shares.
We are currently offering shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan at $8.63 per share. Our current offering price exceeds our net tangible book value per share. Our net tangible book value per share is a rough approximation of value calculated as total book value of assets (exclusive of certain intangible items, including deferred financing costs) minus total

7



liabilities, divided by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding. It assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time as shown through the depreciation and amortization of real estate investments. Real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions. Net tangible book value is used generally as a conservative measure of net worth that we do not believe reflects our estimated value per share. It is not intended to reflect the value of our assets upon an orderly liquidation of the company in accordance with our investment objectives. Our net tangible book value reflects dilution in value of our common stock from the issue price as a result of (i) operating losses, which reflect accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate investments, (ii) fees paid in connection with our initial public offering, including selling commissions and marketing fees re-allowed by our dealer manager to participating broker dealers, and (iii) stock distributions we have made. As of December 31, 2017, our net tangible book value per share was $5.43.
The actual value of shares that we repurchase under our share redemption program may be substantially less than what we pay.
Under our share redemption program, shares currently may be repurchased at varying prices depending on (a) the purchase price paid for the shares and (b) whether the redemptions are sought upon a stockholder’s death, “qualifying disability” (as defined in the program), or confinement to a long-term care facility. The current maximum price that may be paid under the program is $9.08 per share. This redemption price is likely to differ from the price at which a stockholder could resell his or her shares for the reasons discussed in the risk factor above. Thus, when we repurchase shares of our common stock at $8.63 per share, the actual value of the shares that we repurchase will be less, and the repurchase will be dilutive to our remaining stockholders. Even at lower repurchase prices, the actual value of the shares may be substantially less than what we pay and the repurchase may be dilutive to our remaining stockholders.
We face risks associated with security breaches through cyber-attacks, cyber intrusions or otherwise, as well as other significant disruptions of our information technology, or IT, networks and related systems.
We will face risks associated with security breaches, whether through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusions over the Internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to e-mails, persons inside our organization or persons with access to systems inside our organization, and other significant disruptions of our IT networks and related systems. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attack or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Our IT networks and related systems are essential to the operation of our business and our ability to perform day-today operations (including managing our building systems), and, in some cases, may be critical to the operations of certain of our tenants. There can be no assurance that our efforts to maintain the security and integrity of these types of IT networks and related systems will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. A security breach or other significant disruption involving our IT networks and related systems could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest
Because we rely on affiliates of Resource Real Estate for the provision of advisory and property management, if Resource Real Estate is unable to meet its obligations we may be required to find alternative providers of these services, which could result in a significant and costly disruption of our business.
Resource Real Estate, through one or more of its subsidiaries, owns and controls our Advisor and our Manager. The operations of our Advisor and our Manager rely substantially on Resource Real Estate and its affiliates. In the event that Resource Real Estate becomes unable to meet its obligations as they become due, we might be required to find alternative service providers, which could result in a significant disruption of our business and would likely adversely affect the value of your investment in us. Further, given the non-solicitation agreement we have with our advisor, it would be difficult for us to utilize any current employees that provide services to us.
Our Advisor and its affiliates, including all of our executive officers, two of our directors and other key real estate professionals face conflicts of interest caused by their compensation arrangements with us, which could result in actions that are not in the long-term best interests of our stockholders.
All of our executive officers and our directors are also officers, directors, managers or key professionals of our Advisor and other affiliated Resource Real Estate and/or affiliated C-III entities. Our Advisor and its affiliates receive substantial fees from us. These fees could influence our advisor’s advice to us as well as the judgment of affiliates of our advisor. Among other matters, these compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to:

8



the continuation, renewal or enforcement of our agreements with our Advisor and its affiliates, including the advisory agreement and the management agreement;
sales of properties and other investments, which may entitle our Advisor to disposition fees and the possible issuance to our Advisor of shares of our common stock through the conversion of our convertible stock;
acquisitions of properties and investments in loans, which entitle our Advisor to acquisition and asset management fees, and, in the case of acquisitions or investments from other Resource Real Estate-sponsored programs, might entitle affiliates of our Advisor to disposition fees in connection with its services for the seller;
borrowings to acquire properties and other investments, which borrowings will increase the acquisition and asset management fees payable to our Advisor;
whether and when we seek to list our common stock on a national securities exchange, which listing could entitle our Advisor to the issuance of shares of our common stock through the conversion of our convertible stock; and
whether and when we seek to sell the company or its assets, which sale could entitle our Advisor to disposition fees and to the issuance of shares of our common stock through the conversion of our convertible stock and terminate the asset management fee.
The fees our Advisor receives in connection with the acquisition and management of assets are based on the cost of the investment, and not based on the quality of the investment or the quality of the services rendered to us. This may influence our Advisor to recommend riskier transactions to us.
Our Advisor faces conflicts of interest relating to the acquisition of assets and such conflicts may not be resolved in our favor, which could limit our ability to make distributions and reduce your overall investment return.
We rely on our sponsor and other key real estate professionals at our Advisor to identify suitable investment opportunities for us. The executive officers and several of the other key real estate professionals at our Advisor are also the key real estate professionals at the advisors to other Resource Real Estate-sponsored programs and joint ventures. As such, Resource Real Estate-sponsored programs and joint ventures rely on many of the same real estate professionals as will future programs. Many investment opportunities that are suitable for us may also be suitable for other Resource Real Estate programs and joint ventures. When these real estate professionals direct an investment opportunity to any Resource Real Estate-sponsored program or joint venture, they, in their sole discretion, will offer the opportunity to the program or joint venture for which the investment opportunity is most suitable based on the investment objectives, portfolio and criteria of each program or joint venture. For so long as we are externally advised, our charter provides that it shall not be a proper purpose of the corporation for us to purchase real estate or any significant asset related to real estate unless our Advisor has recommended the investment to us. Thus, the real estate professionals of our Advisor could direct attractive investment opportunities to other entities. Such events could result in us investing in properties that provide less attractive returns, which may reduce our ability to make distributions to you.

9



Our Advisor faces conflicts of interest relating to joint ventures that we may form with affiliates of our Advisor, which conflicts could result in a disproportionate benefit to the other venture partners at our expense.
If approved by our conflicts committee, we may enter into joint venture agreements with other Resource Real Estate-sponsored programs or affiliated entities for the acquisition, development or improvement of properties or other investments. Our Advisor and the advisors to the other Resource Real Estate or C-III-sponsored programs have the same executive officers and key employees; and these persons will face conflicts of interest in determining which Resource Real Estate program or investor should enter into any particular joint venture agreement. These persons may also face a conflict in structuring the terms of the relationship between our interests and the interests of the affiliated co-venturer and in managing the joint venture. Any joint venture agreement or transaction between us and an affiliated co-venturer will not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiation of the type normally conducted between unrelated co-venturers. The affiliated co-venturer may have economic or business interests or goals that are or may become inconsistent with our business interests or goals. These co-venturers may thus be either to our and your benefit or detriment.
Our Advisor, the real estate professionals assembled by our Advisor, their affiliates and our officers face competing demands relating to their time, and this may cause our operations and your investment to suffer.
We rely on our Advisor, the real estate professionals our Advisor has assembled and their affiliates and officers for the day-to-day operation of our business. Our Advisor, its real estate professionals and affiliates, including our officers and employees, have interests in other affiliated programs and engage in other business activities. As a result of their interests in other affiliated programs and the fact that they have engaged in and they will continue to engage in other business activities, they face conflicts of interest in allocating their time among us, our Advisor and other affiliate-sponsored programs and other business activities in which they are involved. Should our Advisor breach its fiduciary duty to us by inappropriately devoting insufficient time or resources to our business, the returns on our investments may suffer.
Our executive officers and our affiliated directors face conflicts of interest related to their positions in our Advisor and its affiliates which could hinder our ability to implement our business strategy and to generate returns to you.
Our executive officers and our directors are also executive officers, directors, managers and key professionals of our Advisor and other affiliated Resource Real Estate affiliated and/or C-III entities. Their loyalties to these other entities could result in actions or inactions that conflict with their fiduciary duties to us and are detrimental to our business, which could harm the implementation of our business strategy and our investment and leasing opportunities. If we do not successfully implement our business strategy, we may be unable to generate the cash needed to make distributions to you and to maintain or increase the value of our assets.
Payment of substantial fees and expenses to our Advisor and its affiliates reduces cash available for investment and distribution and increases the risk that you will not be able to recover the amount of your investment in our shares.
Our Advisor and its affiliates perform services for us in connection with the selection and acquisition of our investments, the management and leasing of our properties and the administration of our other investments. We pay them substantial fees for these services, which result in immediate dilution to the value of your investment and reduce the amount of cash available for investment or distribution to stockholders.
We also pay significant fees to our Advisor and its affiliates during our operational stage. Those fees include property management and debt servicing fees, asset management fees and obligations to reimburse our advisor and its affiliates for expenses they incur in connection with their providing services to us, including certain personnel services.
We may also pay significant fees during our listing/liquidation stage. The subordinated incentive fee that we will pay to our Advisor upon our investors receiving an agreed upon return on their investment is structured in the form of convertible stock. Our Advisor has exchanged 5,000 shares of our common stock for 50,000 shares of our convertible stock. Under limited circumstances, these shares may be converted into shares of our common stock satisfying our obligation to pay our advisor an incentive fee and diluting our stockholders’ interest in us.  Our convertible stock will convert into shares of common stock on one of two events.  First, it will convert if we have paid distributions to common stockholders such that aggregate distributions are equal to 100% of the price at which we sold our outstanding shares of common stock plus an amount sufficient to produce a 7% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return at that price.  Alternatively, the convertible stock will convert if we list our shares of common stock on a national securities exchange and, on the 31st trading day after listing, the value of our company based on the average trading price of our shares of common stock since the listing, plus prior distributions, combine to meet the same 7% return threshold for our common stockholders.  Each of these two events is a “Triggering Event.” 

10



Upon a Triggering Event, our convertible stock will, unless our advisory agreement with our advisor has been terminated or not renewed on account of a material breach by our Advisor, generally be converted into a number of shares of common stock equal to 1/50,000 of the quotient of:
(A) 15% of the amount, if any, by which
(1) the value of the company as of the date of the event triggering the conversion plus the total distributions paid to our stockholders through such date on the then outstanding shares of our common stock exceeds
(2) the sum of the aggregate issue price of those outstanding shares plus a 7% cumulative, non-compounded, annual return on the issue price of those outstanding shares as of the date of the event triggering the conversion, divided by
(B) the value of the company divided by the number of outstanding shares of common stock, in each case, as of the date of the event triggering the conversion. 
However, if our advisory agreement with our Advisor expires without renewal or is terminated (other than because of a material breach by our advisor) prior to a Triggering Event, then upon a Triggering Event the holder of the convertible stock will be entitled to a prorated portion of the number of shares of common stock determined by the foregoing calculation, where such proration is based on the percentage of time we were advised by our advisor.  As a result, following conversion, the holder of the convertible stock will be entitled to a portion of amounts distributable to our stockholders, which such amounts distributable to the holder could be significant. 
Our Advisor can influence whether our common stock is listed for trading on a national securities exchange.  Accordingly, our advisor can influence the conversion of the convertible stock issued to it and the resulting dilution of other stockholders’ interests.
These fees and other potential payments increase the risk that the amount available for distribution to common stockholders upon a liquidation of our portfolio would be less than the purchase price of the shares in this offering. Substantial consideration paid to our Advisor and its affiliates also increases the risk that you will not be able to resell your shares at a profit, even if our shares are listed on a national securities exchange.
Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure
Our charter limits the number of shares a person may own, which may discourage a takeover that could otherwise result in a premium price to our stockholders.
Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT. To help us comply with the REIT ownership requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, our charter prohibits a person from directly or constructively owning more than 9.8% of our outstanding shares, unless exempted by our board of directors. This restriction may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all, or substantially all, of our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock.
Our charter permits our board of directors to issue stock with terms that may subordinate the rights of our common stockholders or discourage a third party from acquiring us in a manner that could result in a premium price to our stockholders.
Our board of directors may increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares of stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue and classify or reclassify any unissued common stock or preferred stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption of any such stock. Our board of directors could authorize the issuance of preferred stock with terms and conditions that could have priority as to distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation over the rights of the holders of our common stock. Such preferred stock could also have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all, or substantially all, of our assets) that might provide a premium price to holders of our common stock. A majority of our conflicts committee must approve any issuance of preferred stock.

11



Rapid changes in the values of our assets may make it more difficult for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT or our exception from the definition of an investment company under the Investment Company Act.
If the market value or income potential of our qualifying real estate assets changes as compared to the market value or income potential of our non-qualifying assets, or if the market value or income potential of our assets that are considered “real estate-related assets” under the Investment Company Act or REIT qualification tests changes as compared to the market value or income potential of our assets that are not considered “real estate-related assets” under the Investment Company Act or REIT qualification tests, whether as a result of increased interest rates, prepayment rates or other factors, we may need to modify our investment portfolio in order to maintain our REIT qualification or exception from the definition of an investment company. If the decline in asset values or income occurs quickly, this may be especially difficult, if not impossible, to accomplish. This difficulty may be exacerbated by the illiquid nature of many of the assets that we may own. We may have to make investment decisions that we otherwise would not make absent REIT and Investment Company Act considerations.
You may not be able to sell your shares under our share redemption program and, if you are able to sell your shares under the program, you may not be able to recover the amount of your investment in our shares.
Our board of directors has approved the share redemption program, but may amend, suspend or terminate our share redemption program upon 30 days’ notice without stockholder approval.  Our board of directors may reject any request for redemption of shares.  Further, there are many limitations on your ability to sell your shares pursuant to the share redemption program.  Any stockholder requesting repurchase of their shares pursuant to our share redemption program will be required to certify to us that such stockholder acquired the shares by either (1) a purchase directly from us or (2) a transfer from the original investor by way of (i) a bona fide gift not for value to, or for the benefit of, a member of the stockholder’s immediate or extended family, (ii) a transfer to a custodian, trustee or other fiduciary for the account of the stockholder or his or her immediate or extended family in connection with an estate planning transaction, including by bequest or inheritance upon death or (iii) operation of law.
In addition, our share redemption program contains other restrictions and limitations.  We expect to redeem shares on a quarterly basis. Shares will be redeemed pro rata among all stockholders requesting redemption in such quarter, with a priority given to redemptions upon the death, qualifying disability, or confinement to a long-term care facility of a stockholder; next, to stockholders who demonstrate, in the discretion of our board of directors, another involuntary, exigent circumstance, such as bankruptcy; next, to stockholders subject to a mandatory distribution requirement under such stockholder’s IRA; and, finally, to other redemption requests. 
You must hold your shares for at least one year prior to seeking redemption under the share redemption program, except that our board of directors may waive this one-year holding requirement with respect to redemptions sought upon the death, qualifying disability, or confinement to a long-term care facility of a stockholder or for other exigent circumstances, and that if a stockholder is redeeming all of his or her shares the board of directors may waive the one-year holding requirement with respect to shares purchased pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan. We will not redeem more than 5% of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the twelve-month period immediately prior to the date of redemption.  Our board of directors will determine from time to time, and at least quarterly, whether we have sufficient excess cash to repurchase shares.  Generally, the cash available for redemption will be limited to proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan plus 1% of the operating cash flow from the previous fiscal year (to the extent positive).
Other than redemptions following the death, qualifying disability or confinement to a long-term care facility of a stockholder, the purchase price for such shares we repurchase under our redemption program will be as follows.
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least one year, 92.5% of our most recent applicable net asset value ("NAV") per share as of the applicable redemption date;
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least two years, 95.0% of our most recent applicable NAV per share as of the applicable redemption date;
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least three years, 97.5% of our most recent applicable NAV per share as of the applicable redemption date; and
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least four years, 100% of our most recent applicable NAV per share as of the applicable redemption date.
In addition, the purchase price per share will be adjusted for any stock combinations, splits, recapitalizations and the like with respect to the shares of common stock and reduced by the aggregate amount of net sale or refinance proceeds per share, if any, distributed to the redeeming stockholder prior to the redemption date.

12



Accordingly, you may receive less by selling your shares back to us than you would receive if our investments were sold for their estimated values and such proceeds were distributed in our liquidation.
Your interest in us will be diluted if we issue additional shares, which could reduce the overall value of your investment.
Our stockholders do not have preemptive rights to any shares we issue in the future. Our charter authorizes us to issue 1,010,050,000 shares of capital stock, of which 1,000,000,000 shares are designated as common stock, 50,000 shares are designated as convertible stock and 10,000,000 are designated as preferred stock. Our board of directors may increase the number of authorized shares of capital stock without stockholder approval. After you purchase shares in this offering, our board may elect to (1) sell additional equity securities in future public or private offerings; (2) issue shares of our common stock upon the exercise of the options we may grant to our independent directors or to employees of our advisor or property manager; (3) issue shares to our Advisor, its successors or assigns, in payment of an outstanding obligation or as consideration in a related-party transaction; (4) issue shares of common stock upon the conversion of our convertible stock; or (5) issue shares of our common stock to sellers of properties we acquire in connection with an exchange of limited partnership interests of our operating partnership. To the extent we issue additional equity interests, your percentage ownership interest in us will be diluted. Further, depending upon the terms of such transactions, most notably the offering price per share, which may be less than the price paid per share in any public offering and the value of our properties, existing stockholders may also experience a dilution in the book value of their investment in us.
If we are unable to obtain funding for future capital needs, cash distributions to our stockholders could be reduced and the value of our investments could decline.
If we need additional capital in the future to improve or maintain our properties or for any other reason, we may have to obtain financing from sources beyond our cash flow from operations, such as borrowings, sales of assets or future equity offerings. These sources of funding may not be available on attractive terms or at all. If we cannot procure additional funding for capital improvements, our investments may generate lower cash flows or decline in value, or both, which would limit our ability to make distributions to you and could reduce the value of your investment.
Our board of directors could opt into certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law in the future, which may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and may prevent our stockholders from receiving a premium price for their stock in connection with a business combination.
Under Maryland law, “business combinations” between a Maryland corporation and certain interested stockholders or affiliates of interested stockholders are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business combinations include a merger, consolidation, share exchange, or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities. Also under Maryland law, control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares owned by the acquirer, an officer of the corporation or an employee of the corporation who is also a director of the corporation are excluded from the vote on whether to accord voting rights to the control shares. Should our board opt into these provisions of Maryland law, it may discourage others from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
Because Maryland law permits our board to adopt certain anti-takeover measures without stockholder approval, investors may be less likely to receive a “control premium” for their shares.
In 1999, the State of Maryland enacted legislation that enhances the power of Maryland corporations to protect themselves from unsolicited takeovers. Among other things, the legislation permits our board, without stockholder approval, to amend our charter to:
stagger our board of directors into three classes;
require a two-thirds stockholder vote for removal of directors;
provide that only the board can fix the size of the board;
provide that all vacancies on the board, however created, may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors in office; and
require that special stockholder meetings may only be called by holders of a majority of the voting shares entitled to be cast at the meeting.
Under Maryland law, a corporation can opt to be governed by some or all of these provisions if it has a class of equity securities registered under the Exchange Act, and has at least three independent directors. Our charter does not prohibit our board from opting into any of the above provisions permitted under Maryland law. Becoming governed by any of these provisions could

13



discourage an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our securities.
If we internalize our management functions, we could incur significant costs associated with being self-managed and may not be able to retain or replace key personnel; and we may have increased exposure to litigation as a result of internalizing our management functions.
We may internalize management functions provided by our Advisor, our Manager and their respective affiliates by acquiring assets and personnel from our advisor, our property manager or their affiliates. In the event we were to acquire our advisor or our property manager, we cannot be sure of the terms relating to any such acquisition.
If we internalize, we would no longer bear the costs of the various fees and expenses we expect to pay to our Advisor and to our Manager under their respective agreements; however, our direct expenses would increase due to the inclusion of general and administrative costs, including legal, accounting, and other expenses related to corporate governance, SEC reporting and compliance. We would also incur the compensation and benefits costs of our officers and other employees and consultants that are now paid by our advisor, our property manager or their affiliates. We cannot reasonably estimate the amount of fees to our advisor, property manager and other affiliates we would save, and the costs we would incur, if we acquired these entities. If the expenses we assume as a result of an internalization are higher than the expenses we avoid paying to our advisor, our property manager and their affiliates, our net income per share and funds from operations per share would be lower than they otherwise would have been had we not acquired these entities, potentially decreasing the amount of funds available for distribution.
Additionally, if we internalize our management functions, we would employ personnel and would be subject to potential liabilities commonly faced by employers, such as workers’ disability and compensation claims, potential labor disputes and other employee-related liabilities and grievances. Also, there can be no assurances that we will be successful in retaining key personnel at our advisor or property manager in the event of an internalization transaction. In addition, we could have difficulty integrating the functions currently performed by our advisor, our property manager and their affiliates. Currently, the officers and employees of our Advisor, our Manager, and their affiliates perform asset management, property management, and general and administrative functions, including accounting and financial reporting, for multiple entities. We may fail to properly identify the appropriate mix of personnel and capital needs to operate as a stand-alone entity. An inability to manage an internalization transaction effectively could result in our incurring additional costs and/or experiencing deficiencies in our disclosures controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting. Such deficiencies could cause us to incur additional costs and our management’s attention could be diverted from effectively managing our properties and overseeing other real estate-related assets.
In addition, in recent years, internalization transactions have been the subject of stockholder litigation. Stockholder litigation can be costly and time-consuming, and there can be no assurance that any litigation expenses we might incur would not be significant or that the outcome of litigation would be favorable to us. Any amounts we are required to expend defending any such litigation will reduce the amount of funds available for investment by us in properties or other investments.
Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate
Economic and regulatory changes that impact the real estate market generally may decrease the value of our investments and weaken our operating results.
The properties we acquire and their performance are subject to the risks typically associated with real estate, including:
downturns in national, regional and local economic conditions;
competition;
adverse local conditions, such as oversupply or reduction in demand and changes in real estate zoning laws that may reduce the desirability of real estate in an area;
vacancies, changes in market rental rates and the need to periodically repair, renovate and re-let space;
changes in the supply of or the demand for similar or competing properties in an area;
changes in interest rates and the availability of permanent mortgage financing, which may render the sale of a property or loan difficult or unattractive;
changes in governmental regulations, including those involving tax, real estate usage, environmental and zoning laws; and
periods of high interest rates and tight money supply.

14



Any of the above factors, or a combination thereof, could result in a decrease in the value of our investments, which would have an adverse effect on our results of operations, reduce the cash available for distributions and the return on your investment.
Residents of multifamily rental properties or tenants of other property classes we intend to acquire as discounted real estate assets who have experienced personal financial problems or a downturn in their business may delay enforcement of our rights, and we may incur substantial costs attempting to protect our investment.
The discounted real estate assets may involve investments in commercial leases with residents or tenants who have experienced a downturn in their residential or business leases and with residents or tenants who have experienced difficulties with their personal financial situations such as a job loss, bankruptcy or bad credit rating, resulting in their failure to make timely rental payments or their default under their leases or debt instruments. In the event of any default by residents or tenants at our properties, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights and may incur substantial costs attempting to protect our investment.
The bankruptcy or insolvency of any resident or tenant also may adversely affect the income produced by our properties. If any resident or tenant becomes a debtor in a case under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, our actions may be restricted by the bankruptcy court and our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The operating costs of our properties will not necessarily decrease if our income decreases.
Certain expenses associated with ownership and operation of a property may be intentionally increased to enhance the short- and long-term success of the property in the form of capital gain and current income, such as:
increased staffing levels;
enhanced technology applications; and
increased marketing efforts.
Certain expenses associated with the ownership and operation of a property are not necessarily reduced by events that adversely affect the income from the property, such as:
real estate taxes;
insurance costs; and
maintenance costs.
For example, if the leased property loses tenants or rents are reduced, then those costs described in the preceding sentence are not necessarily reduced. As a result, our cost of owning and operating leased properties may, in the future, exceed the income the property generates even though the property’s income exceeded its costs at the time it was acquired. This would decrease the amount of cash available to us to distribute to you and could negatively affect your return on investment.
We compete with third parties in acquiring, managing and selling properties and other investments, which could reduce our profitability and the return on your investment.
We believe that the current market for properties that meet our investment objectives is extremely competitive and many of our competitors have greater resources than we do. We compete with numerous other entities engaged in real estate investment activities, including individuals, corporations, banks and insurance company investment accounts, other REITs, real estate limited partnerships, the U.S. Government and other entities, to acquire, manage and sell real estate and real estate-related assets. Many of our expected competitors enjoy significant competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating efficiencies. In addition, the number of entities and the amount of funds competing for suitable investments may increase.     
Competition with these entities may result in the following:
greater demand for the acquisition of real estate and real estate-related assets, which results in increased prices we must pay for our real estate and real estate-related assets;
delayed investment of our capital;
decreased availability of financing to us; or
reductions in the size or desirability of the potential tenant base for one or more properties that we lease.
If such events occur, you may experience a lower return on your investment.

15



Our joint venture partners could take actions that decrease the value of an investment to us and lower our stockholders’ overall return.
We may enter into joint ventures to acquire properties and other assets. We may also purchase and renovate properties in joint ventures or in partnerships, co‑tenancies or other co‑ownership arrangements. Such investments may involve risks not otherwise present with other methods of investment, including, for example, the following risks:
that our co‑venturer, co‑tenant or partner in an investment could become insolvent or bankrupt;
that such co‑venturer, co‑tenant or partner may at any time have economic or business interests or goals that are or that become inconsistent with our business interests or goals;
that such co‑venturer, co‑tenant or partner may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to our policies or objectives; or
that such co-venturer, co-tenant or partner may grant us a right of first refusal or buy/sell right to buy out such co-venturer or partner, and that we may be unable to finance such a buy-out if it becomes exercisable or we are required to purchase such interest at a time when it would not otherwise be in our best interest to do so. If our interest is subject to a buy/sell right, we may not have sufficient cash, available borrowing capacity or other capital resources to allow us to elect to purchase an interest of a co-venturer subject to the buy/sell right, in which case we may be forced to sell our interest as the result of the exercise of such right when we would otherwise prefer to keep our interest.
Any of the above might subject a property to liabilities in excess of those contemplated and thus reduce our returns on that investment and therefore your return on investment.
Properties that have significant vacancies, especially discounted real estate assets, may experience delays in leasing up or could be difficult to sell, which could diminish our return on these properties.
A property may incur vacancies either by the expiration of tenant leases or the continued default of tenants under their leases. Further, our potential investments in underperforming multifamily rental properties or other types of discounted properties may have significant vacancies at the time of acquisition. If vacancies continue for a prolonged period of time beyond the expected lease-up stage that we anticipate will follow any redevelopment or repositioning efforts, we may suffer reduced revenues resulting in less cash available for distributions. In addition, the resale value of the property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property depends principally upon the value of the cash flow generated by the leases associated with that property. Such a reduction on the resale value of a property could also reduce your return on investment.
We may have difficulty re-leasing underperforming or discounted properties because of the location or reputation of the property.
The nature of discounted real estate assets carries the risk that the properties underlying certain real estate investments may be located in areas of slow, stagnant, or declining economic growth. Such areas may experience high levels of crime and unemployment. In addition to the risks these conditions impose on the current tenants and owners of properties underlying the real estate investments, these conditions may harm the reputation of the property making it difficult to attract future more productive tenants and owners to the areas where the properties are located. The inability to re-lease or re-sell property abandoned, foreclosed upon, or purchased in these areas may result in an unproductive use of our resources and could negatively affect our performance and your return on investment.
Because we rely on our Manager, its affiliates and third parties to manage the day-to-day affairs of any properties we acquire, should the staff of a particular property perform poorly, our operating results for that property will similarly be hindered and our net income may be reduced.
We depend upon the performance of our property managers to effectively manage our properties and real estate-related assets. Poor performance by those sales, leasing and other management staff members operating a particular property will necessarily translate into poor results of operations for that particular property. Should our Manager, its affiliates or third parties fail to identify problems in the day-to-day management of a particular property or fail to take the appropriate corrective action in a timely manner, our operating results may be hindered and our net income reduced.
If we are unable to sell a property for the price, on the terms, or within the time frame we desire, it could limit our ability to pay cash distributions to you.
Many factors that are beyond our control affect the real estate market and could affect our ability to sell properties for the price, on the terms, or within the time frame that we desire. These factors include general economic conditions, the availability

16



of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand. Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, we have a limited ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. Further, before we can sell a property on the terms we want, it may be necessary to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements. However, we can give no assurance that we will have the funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements. We may be unable to sell our properties at a profit. Our inability to sell properties at the time and on the terms we want could reduce our cash flow and limit our ability to make distributions to you and could reduce the value of your investment.
Government entities, community associations and contractors may cause unforeseen delays and increase costs to redevelop and reposition underperforming properties that we may acquire, which may reduce our net income and cash available for distributions to you.
We may seek to or be required to incur substantial capital obligations to redevelop or reposition existing properties that we acquire at a discount as a result of neglect of the previous owners or tenants of the properties and to sell the properties. Our advisor and its key real estate professionals will do their best to acquire properties that do not require excessive redevelopment or modifications and that do not contain hidden defects or problems. There could, however, be unknown and excessive costs, expenses and delays associated with a discounted property’s redevelopment, repositioning or interior and exterior upgrades. We will be subject to risks relating to the uncertainties associated with rezoning for redevelopment and other concerns of governmental entities, community associations and our construction manager’s ability to control costs and to build in conformity with plans and the established timeframe. We will pay a construction management fee to a construction manager, which may be our Manager or its affiliates, if new capital improvements are required.
If we are unable to increase rental rates or sell the redeveloped property at a price consistent with our underwritten projections due to local market or economic conditions to offset the cost of the redevelopment or repositioning the property, the return on your investment may suffer. To the extent we acquire discounted properties in major metropolitan areas where the local government has imposed rent controls, we may be prohibited from increasing the rental rates to a level sufficient to cover the particular property’s redevelopment costs and expenses.
Costs of responding to both known and previously undetected environmental contamination and hazardous conditions may decrease our cash flows and limit our ability to make distributions.
Real property and the operations conducted on real property are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to protection of the environment and human health. We could be subject to liability in the form of fines, penalties or damages for noncompliance with these laws and regulations. These laws and regulations generally govern wastewater discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous materials, the remediation of contamination associated with the release or disposal of solid and hazardous materials, the presence of toxic building materials, and other health and safety-related concerns.
Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on the tenants, current or previous owners or operators of real property for the costs to investigate or remediate contaminated properties, whether the contamination occurred prior to purchase, or whether the acts causing the contamination were legal. These costs could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Our tenants’ operations, the condition of properties at the time we buy them, operations in the vicinity of our properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of unrelated third parties may affect our properties.
Environmental laws also may impose liens on a property or restrictions on the manner in which a property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures or prevent us from entering into leases with prospective tenants that may be impacted by such laws. Environmental laws provide for sanctions for noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. Certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for the release of and exposure to hazardous substances, including asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint. Third parties may seek recovery from real property owners or operators for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances.
The presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly manage or remediate these substances, may hinder our ability to sell, rent or pledge such property as collateral for future borrowings. Any material expenditures, fines, penalties, or damages we must pay will reduce our ability to make distributions and may reduce the value of your investment.

17



Properties acquired by us may have toxic mold that could result in substantial liabilities to us.

Litigation and concern about indoor exposure to certain types of toxic molds has been increasing as the public becomes aware that exposure to mold can cause a variety of health effects and symptoms, including allergic reactions. It is impossible to eliminate all mold and mold spores in the indoor environment. There can be no assurance that the properties acquired by us will not contain toxic mold. The difficulty in discovering indoor toxic mold growth could lead to an increased risk of lawsuits by affected persons and the risk that the cost to remediate toxic mold will exceed the value of the property. There is a risk that we may acquire properties that contain toxic mold and such properties may negatively affect our performance and your return on investment.
Uninsured losses relating to real property or excessively expensive premiums for insurance coverage could reduce our cash flows and the return on your investment.
There are types of losses, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution or environmental matters that are uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. Insurance risks associated with potential acts of terrorism could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Additionally, mortgage lenders in some cases have begun to insist that commercial property owners purchase coverage against terrorism as a condition for providing mortgage loans. Such insurance policies may not be available at reasonable costs, if at all, which could inhibit our ability to finance or refinance our properties. In such instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. We may not have adequate coverage for such losses. If any of our properties incurs a casualty loss that is not fully insured, the value of our assets will be reduced by any such uninsured loss. In addition, other than any working capital reserve or other reserves we may establish, we have no source of funding to repair or reconstruct any uninsured property. Also, to the extent we must pay unexpectedly large amounts for insurance, we could suffer reduced earnings that would result in lower distributions.
Our costs associated with and the risk of failing to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Fair Housing Act and other tax credit programs may adversely affect cash available for distributions.
Our properties are generally expected to be subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended.  Under the Disabilities Act, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons.  The Disabilities Act has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services be made accessible and available to people with disabilities.  The Disabilities Act’s requirements could require removal of access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties or, in some cases, an award of damages.  We cannot assure you that we will be able to acquire properties that comply with the Disabilities Act or place the burden on the seller or other third party to ensure compliance with such laws. If we cannot, our funds used for compliance with these laws may affect cash available for distributions and the amount of distributions to you.
The multifamily rental properties we acquire must comply with Title III of the Disabilities Act, to the extent that such properties are “public accommodations” or “commercial facilities” as defined by the Disabilities Act. Compliance with the Disabilities Act could require removal of structural barriers to handicapped access in certain public areas of our apartment communities where such removal is readily achievable.  The Disabilities Act does not, however, consider residential properties, such as multifamily rental properties, to be public accommodations or commercial facilities, except to the extent portions of such facilities, such as the leasing office, are open to the public.
We also must comply with the Fair Housing Amendment Act of 1988 (“FHAA”), which requires that multifamily rental properties first occupied after March 13, 1991 be accessible to handicapped residents and visitors.  Compliance with the FHAA could require removal of structural barriers to handicapped access in a community, including the interiors of apartment units covered under the FHAA. Recently there has been heightened scrutiny of multifamily rental properties for compliance with the requirements of the FHAA and the Disabilities Act and an increasing number of substantial enforcement actions and private lawsuits have been brought against multifamily rental properties to ensure compliance with these requirements.  Noncompliance with the FHAA and the Disabilities Act could result in the imposition of fines, awards of damages to private litigants, payment of attorneys’ fees and other costs to plaintiffs, substantial litigation costs and substantial costs of remediation.
Certain of our properties may be subject to the low income housing tax credits, historic preservation tax credits or other similar tax credit rules at the federal, state or municipal level. The application of these tax credit rules is extremely complicated and noncompliance with these rules may have adverse consequences for us. Noncompliance with applicable tax regulations may result in the loss of future or other tax credits and the fractional recapture of these tax credits already taken. Accordingly,

18



noncompliance with these tax credit rules and related restrictions may adversely affect our ability to distribute any cash to our investors.
Our properties may be dispersed geographically and across various markets and sectors.
We may acquire and operate properties in different locations throughout the United States and in different markets and sectors. The success of our properties will depend largely on our ability to hire various managers and service providers in each area, market and sector where the properties are located or situated. It may be more challenging to manage a diverse portfolio. Failure to meet such challenges could reduce the value of your investment.
Because of the concentration of a significant portion of our assets in certain geographic markets, any adverse economic, real estate or business conditions in these markets could affect our operating results and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders

As of December 31, 2017, our real estate investments in Dallas, Texas, Chicago, Illinois, Georgia, Portland, Oregon, and Denver, Colorado represented approximately 17.4%, 18%, 13.1% and 14.7%, respectively, of the net book value of our rental properties, respectively. As a result, the geographic concentration of our portfolio makes it particularly susceptible to adverse economic developments in the Dallas, Chicago, Atlanta, Portland, and Denver real estate markets. Any adverse economic or real estate developments in these markets, such as business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocations of businesses, changing demographics and other factors, or any decrease in demand for multifamily rentals resulting from the local business climate, could adversely affect our operating results and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.
Newly constructed and existing multifamily rental properties or other properties that compete with any properties we may acquire in any particular location could adversely affect the operating results of our properties and our cash available for distribution.
We may acquire properties in locations that experience increases in construction of multifamily rental or other properties that compete with our properties. This increased competition and construction could:
make it more difficult for us to find residents to lease units in our apartment communities;
force us to lower our rental prices in order to lease units in our apartment communities; or
substantially reduce our revenues and cash available for distribution.
Our efforts to upgrade multifamily rental properties to increase occupancy and raise rental rates through redevelopment and repositioning may fail, which may reduce our net income and the cash available for distributions to you.
The success of our ability to upgrade any multifamily rental properties that we may acquire and realize capital gains and current income for you on these investments materially depends upon the status of the economy where the multifamily rental property is located. Our revenues will be lower if the rental market cannot bear the higher rental rate that accompanies the upgraded multifamily rental property due to job losses or other economic hardships. Should the local market be unable to support a higher rental rate for a multifamily rental property that we upgraded, we may not realize the premium rental we had assumed by a given upgrade and we may realize reduced rental income or a reduced gain or even loss upon the sale of the property. These events could cause us to reduce the cash available for distributions.
Repositioning risks could affect our profitability.
A component of our strategy is to renovate and reposition multifamily communities in order to effect long-term growth. Our renovation and repositioning activities generally entail certain risks, including the following:
funds may be expended and management’s time devoted to projects that may not be completed due to a variety of factors, including without limitation, the inability to obtain necessary governmental approvals;
construction costs of a renovation or repositioning project may exceed original estimates, possibly making the project economically unfeasible or the economic return on a repositioned property less than anticipated;
increased material and labor costs, problems with subcontractors, or other costs due to errors and omissions which occur in the renovation process;
projects may be delayed due to required governmental approvals, adverse weather conditions, labor shortages or other unforeseen complications;
occupancy rates and rents at a repositioned property may be less than anticipated; and
the operating expenses at a repositioned property may be higher than anticipated.

19



These risks may reduce the funds available for distribution to our stockholders. Further, the renovation and repositioning of properties is also subject to the general risks associated with real estate investments.
A concentration of our investments in any one property sector may leave our profitability vulnerable to a downturn or slowdown in such sector.
All of our investments are in the multifamily sector.  Vacancy rates in multifamily rental properties and other commercial real estate properties may be related to jobless rates. As a result, we are subject to risks inherent in investments in a single type of property. The potential effects on our revenues, and as a result, on cash available for distribution, resulting from increased jobless rates as well as a general downturn or slowdown in multifamily properties could be more pronounced than if we had more fully diversified our investments.
Increased competition and the increased affordability of single-family and multifamily homes and condominiums for sale or rent could limit our ability to retain residents, lease apartment units or increase or maintain rents.
Any multifamily rental property that we may acquire and own will most likely compete with numerous housing alternatives in attracting residents, including single-family and multifamily homes and condominiums. Due to the current economic conditions, competitive housing in a particular area and the increasing affordability of single-family and multifamily homes and condominiums to buy caused by relatively low mortgage interest rates and generous federal and state government programs to promote home ownership could adversely affect our ability to fully occupy any multifamily rental properties we may acquire. Further, single-family homes and condominiums available for rent could also adversely affect our ability to retain our residents, lease apartment units and increase or maintain rental rates.
Short-term multifamily leases expose us to the effects of declining market rent, which could adversely impact our ability to make cash distributions.
We expect that substantially all of our apartment leases will be for a term of one year or less. Because these leases generally permit the residents to leave at the end of the lease term or earlier in certain situations, such as when a resident loses his/her job, without penalty, our rental revenues may be impacted by declines in market rents more quickly than if our leases were for longer terms.
If we acquire student housing properties, these properties would be subject to an annual leasing cycle, short lease-up period, seasonal cash flows, changing university admission and housing policies and other risks inherent in the student housing industry.
Similar to multifamily rental properties, if we acquire student housing, we expect to generally lease such properties under short-term, 12-month leases, and in certain cases, under nine-month or shorter-term semester leases. As a result, we may experience significantly reduced cash flows during the summer months at properties leased under leases having terms shorter than 12 months. Student housing properties are also typically leased during a limited leasing season that usually begins in January and ends in August of each year. We are therefore highly dependent on the effectiveness of our marketing and leasing efforts and personnel during this season.
Changes in university admission policies or overall student enrollment levels could also adversely affect the investment return on student housing properties. For example, if a university reduces the number of student admissions or requires that a certain class of students, such as freshman, live in a university-owned facility, the demand for beds at our properties may be reduced and our occupancy rates may decline. We will also be required to form relationships directly or through third parties with colleges and universities for referrals of prospective student-residents or for mailing lists of prospective student-residents and their parents. Any failure to maintain good relationships with these colleges and universities could therefore have a material adverse effect on us. Federal and state laws require colleges to publish and distribute reports of on-campus crime statistics, which may result in negative publicity and media coverage associated with crimes occurring on or in the vicinity of our on-campus properties.

20



If we acquire student housing properties, we may face significant competition from university-owned on-campus student housing, from other off-campus student housing properties and from traditional multifamily housing located within close proximity to universities.
On-campus student housing has certain inherent advantages over off-campus student housing in terms of physical proximity to the university campus and integration of on-campus facilities into the academic community. Colleges and universities can generally avoid real estate taxes and borrow funds at lower interest rates than us and other private sector operators. Competition from university-owned on-campus housing could adversely affect the performance of any student housing properties we may acquire.
If we invest in senior residential properties, we may incur liability for failing to comply with the FHAA and the Housing for Older Persons Act or certain state regulations.
Any senior residential properties we acquire will be required to qualify as housing for older persons and will be required to comply with the appropriate federal and state laws governing age and owner occupancy. Noncompliance with the FHAA and the Housing for Older Persons Act and certain state registration requirements could result in fines, awards of damages to private litigants, payment of attorneys’ fees and other substantial costs of remediation.
The condominium industry is subject to extensive regulation and other unique risks.
We may invest in condominium properties to convert the condominiums into multifamily rental units or market and sell the condominium units at discounted prices. These activities are subject to extensive laws and regulations of local, state and federal governments. These laws and regulations vary by municipality and state and their requirements can be burdensome and costly.
Further, condominium associations often serve as mini-governments in the form and manner by which they govern the activities and services impacting the residents of the condominium building. Our lack of control over any condominium association, where we own the building, could raise additional risks of undue delay or unexpected costs to sell the discounted condominium units or convert them into multifamily rental units. In addition, condominium buildings and their associations may also be subject to litigation from contractors, other condominium owners or other third parties and may be subject to other unknown liabilities not readily discoverable upon initial due diligence.
Changing market conditions, especially in the greater metropolitan areas may adversely impact our ability to sell condominium units at expected prices, or at all, which could hinder our results of operations and reduce our net income.
If we acquire a condominium building for conversion or to sell units at a discount, there could be a significant amount of time before we can redevelop or reposition the condominium units available for conversion or sale. The market value of a condominium unit being redeveloped or repositioned can vary significantly during this time due to changing market conditions. If we acquire condominiums or attempt to convert multifamily or hotel properties into condominiums, lower prices of condominium units and sales activities in major metropolitan markets or other markets where these properties may be located could adversely affect our results of operations and net income. Although demand in major metropolitan geographic areas historically has been strong, increased purchase price appreciation may reduce the likelihood of consumers seeking to purchase new residences, which would likely harm our ability to sell units in residential condominium buildings. If the prices of condominium units or sales activity decline in the key markets in which we may operate, our costs may not decline at all or at the same rate and, as a result, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.
Condominium purchasers may be unwilling or unable to purchase condominium units at times when mortgage-financing costs are high or as credit quality declines.
The majority of our potential purchasers for discounted condominium units will finance their purchases through third-party lenders. In general, housing demand is adversely affected by increases in interest rates, demand for increased down payments and by decreases in the availability of mortgage financing as a result of declining customer credit quality or other issues. Further, there are additional constraints on certain government-sponsored entities, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, for potential condominium purchasers in projects where a substantial number of units remain unsold in a particular condominium project. Even though we closely monitor the mortgage market for prospective buyers for condominium units, if mortgage interest rates increase or the average down payment requirement increases, the ability or willingness of prospective buyers to finance condominium unit purchases may be adversely affected.

21



If we acquire condominium properties or mixed-use properties that combine hotel, multifamily or condominiums, a fire or other accident could occur in a single unit that causes the entire building to be uninhabitable.
We may experience greater risks in the condominium and mixed-use property investments because there could be a higher likelihood of an accident occurring in a building containing numerous individuals where we do not have the same ability to monitor or review the building as other property classes. A fire or other accident in a single unit could in turn cause the entire building to be uninhabitable. Even if there is insurance on the building, it may not be enough to cover all of the losses as a result of a fire or other accident.
Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate-Related Debt Assets
Our investments in real estate-related debt investments are subject to the risks typically associated with real estate.
Our investments in mortgage, mezzanine or other real estate loans will generally be directly or indirectly secured by a lien on real property (or the equity interests in an entity that owns real property) that, upon the occurrence of a default on the loan, could result in our acquiring ownership of the property. We will not know whether the values of the properties ultimately securing our loans will remain at the levels existing on the dates of origination of those loans. If the values of the underlying properties drop, our risk will increase because of the lower value of the security associated with such loans. In this manner, real estate values could impact the values of our loan investments. Our investments in other real estate-related debt investments may be similarly affected by real estate property values. Therefore, our real estate-related debt investments will be subject to the risks typically associated with real estate, which are described above under the heading “-Risks Related to Investments in Real Estate.”
If we make or invest in mortgage, mezzanine, bridge or other real estate loans, our loans will be subject to interest rate fluctuations that will affect our returns as compared to market interest rates; accordingly, the value of our stockholders’ investment would be subject to fluctuations in interest rates.
If we make or invest in fixed rate, long‑term loans and interest rates rise, the loans could yield a return that is lower than then‑current market rates. If interest rates decrease, we will be adversely affected to the extent that loans are prepaid because we may not be able to reinvest the proceeds at as high of an interest rate. If we invest in variable‑rate loans and interest rates decrease, our revenues will also decrease. For these reasons, if we invest in mortgage, mezzanine, bridge or other real estate loans, our returns on those loans and the value of our stockholders’ investment will be subject to fluctuations in interest rates.
Delays in liquidating defaulted mortgage loans could reduce our investment returns.
If we make or invest in mortgage loans and there are defaults under those mortgage loans, we may not be able to repossess and sell the underlying properties quickly. The resulting time delay could reduce the value of our investment in the defaulted mortgage loans. An action to foreclose on a property securing a mortgage loan is regulated by state statutes and regulations and is subject to many of the delays and expenses of other lawsuits if the defendant raises defenses or counterclaims. In the event of default by a mortgagor, these restrictions, among other things, may impede our ability to foreclose on or sell the mortgaged property or to obtain proceeds sufficient to repay all amounts due to us on the mortgage loan.
Government action may reduce recoveries on defaulted loans.
Legislative or regulatory initiatives by federal, state or local legislative bodies or administrative agencies, if enacted or adopted, could delay foreclosure, provide new defenses to foreclosure or otherwise impair our ability to foreclose on real estate-related debt investments in default. Bankruptcy courts could, if this legislation is enacted, reduce the amount of the principal balance on a mortgage loan that is secured by a lien on the mortgaged property, reduce the interest rate, extend the term to maturity or otherwise modify the terms of a bankrupt borrower’s mortgage loan.
Property owners filing for bankruptcy may adversely affect us.
The filing of a petition in bankruptcy automatically stops or “stays” any actions to enforce the terms of all debt of the debtor, including a mortgage loan. The length of the stay and the costs associated with it will generally have an adverse impact on our profitability. Further, the bankruptcy court may take other actions that prevent us from foreclosing on the property. Any bankruptcy proceeding will, at a minimum, delay us in achieving our investment objectives and may adversely affect our profitability.

22



Investment in non‑conforming and non‑investment-grade loans may involve increased risk of loss.
Loans we may acquire may not conform to conventional loan criteria applied by traditional lenders and may not be rated or may be rated as non‑investment grade. Non‑investment-grade ratings for these loans typically result from the overall leverage of the loans, the lack of a strong operating history for the properties underlying the loans, the borrowers’ credit history, the properties’ underlying cash flow or other factors. As a result, loans we acquire may have a higher risk of default and loss than conventional loans. Any loss we incur may reduce distributions to stockholders and adversely affect the value of our common stock.
Our investments in subordinated loans may be subject to losses.
We may acquire subordinated loans. In the event a borrower defaults on a subordinated loan and lacks sufficient capacity to cure the default, we may suffer a loss of principal or interest. In the event a borrower declares bankruptcy, we may not have full recourse to the assets of the borrower, or the assets of the borrower may not be sufficient to satisfy the loan. If a borrower defaults on our loan or on debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt is paid in full. Where debt senior to our loan exists, the presence of intercreditor arrangements may limit our ability to amend our loan documents, assign our loans, accept prepayments, exercise our remedies (through “standstill periods”), and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers.
To the extent that we make investments in real estate-related securities, a portion of those investments may be illiquid and we may not be able to adjust our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions.
Certain of the real estate-related securities that we may purchase in connection with privately negotiated transactions will not be registered under the relevant securities laws, resulting in a prohibition against their transfer, sale, pledge or other disposition except in a transaction that is exempt from the registration requirements of, or is otherwise in accordance with, those laws. As a result, our ability to vary our portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be relatively limited. The mezzanine and certain of the other loans we may purchase will be particularly illiquid investments due to their short life, their unsuitability for securitization and the greater difficulty of recoupment in the event of a borrower’s default.
Investments in non-performing real estate assets involve greater risks than investments in stabilized, performing assets and make our future performance more difficult to predict.

Traditional performance metrics of real estate assets are generally not as reliable for non-performing real estate assets as they are for performing real estate assets. Non-performing properties, for example, do not have stabilized occupancy rates. Similarly, non-performing loans do not have a consistent stream of loan servicing or interest payments. In addition, for non-performing loans, often there is greater uncertainty that the face amount of the note will be paid in full.
In addition, we may pursue more than one strategy to create value in a non-performing real estate investment. With respect to a property, these strategies may include development, redevelopment, or lease-up of such property. With respect to a loan, these strategies may include negotiating with the borrower for a reduced payoff, restructuring the terms of the loan or enforcing our rights as lender under the loan and foreclosing on the collateral securing the loan.
The factors described above make it challenging to evaluate non-performing investments.
Delays in restructuring or liquidating non‑performing real estate securities could reduce the return on our stockholders’ investment.
Real estate securities may become non‑performing after acquisition for a wide variety of reasons. Such non‑performing real estate investments may require a substantial amount of workout negotiations or restructuring, which may entail, among other things, a substantial reduction in the interest rate and a substantial write‑down of such loan or asset. However, even if a restructuring is successfully accomplished, upon maturity of such real estate security, replacement “takeout” financing may not be available. We may find it necessary or desirable to foreclose on some of the collateral securing one or more of our investments. Intercreditor provisions may substantially interfere with our ability to do so. Even if foreclosure is an option, the foreclosure process can be lengthy and expensive. Borrowers often resist foreclosure actions by asserting numerous claims, counterclaims and defenses, including, without limitation, lender liability claims and defenses, in an effort to prolong the foreclosure action. In some states, foreclosure actions can take up to several years or more to litigate. At any time during the foreclosure proceedings, the borrower may file for bankruptcy, which would have the effect of staying the foreclosure action and further delaying the foreclosure process. Foreclosure litigation tends to create a negative public image of the collateral property and may result in disrupting ongoing leasing and management of the property. Foreclosure actions by senior lenders may substantially affect the amount that we may earn or recover from an investment.

23



We will depend on debtors for our revenue, and, accordingly, our revenue and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders will be dependent upon the success and economic viability of such debtors.
The success of our real estate-related debt investments such as loans and debt and derivative securities will materially depend on the financial stability of the debtors underlying such investments. The inability of a single major debtor or a number of smaller debtors to meet their payment obligations could result in reduced revenue or losses. In the event of a debtor default or bankruptcy, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as a creditor, and such rights may be subordinated to the rights of other creditors. These events could negatively affect the cash available for distribution to our stockholders and the value of our stockholders’ investment.
Prepayments can adversely affect the yields on our investments.
Prepayments on debt instruments, where permitted under the debt documents, are influenced by changes in current interest rates and a variety of economic, geographic and other factors beyond our control, and consequently, such prepayment rates cannot be predicted with certainty. If we are unable to invest the proceeds of such prepayments received, the yield on our portfolio will decline. Under certain interest rate and prepayment scenarios, we may fail to recoup fully our cost of acquisition of certain investments.
Risks Associated with Debt Financing
We have incurred, and may continue to incur, mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which increases our risk of loss due to foreclosure.
We have incurred mortgage indebtedness and we may obtain additional lines of credit and long-term financing that may be secured by our properties and other assets. In some instances, we may acquire real properties by financing a portion of the price of the properties and mortgaging or pledging some or all of the properties purchased as security for that debt. We may also incur mortgage debt on properties that we already own in order to obtain funds to acquire additional properties. In addition, we may borrow as necessary or advisable to ensure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, including borrowings to satisfy the REIT requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to our stockholders (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gain). We, however, can give you no assurance that we will be able to obtain such borrowings on satisfactory terms.
If we do mortgage a property and there is a shortfall between the cash flow from that property and the cash flow needed to service mortgage debt on that property, then the amount of cash available for distributions to stockholders may be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss of a property since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In that case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, reducing the value of your investment. For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our properties would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure even though we would not necessarily receive any cash proceeds. We may give full or partial guaranties to lenders of mortgage debt on behalf of the entities that own our properties. When we give a guaranty on behalf of an entity that owns one of our properties, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity. If any mortgages contain cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, a default on a single property could affect multiple properties.
We may also obtain recourse debt to finance our acquisitions and meet our REIT distribution requirements. If we have insufficient income to service our recourse debt obligations, our lenders could institute proceedings against us to foreclose upon our assets. If a lender successfully forecloses upon any of our assets, our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders will be limited and you could lose all or part of your investment.
High mortgage interest rates may make it difficult for us to finance or refinance properties, which could reduce the number of properties we can acquire, our net income and the amount of cash distributions we can make.
If mortgage debt is unavailable at reasonable interest rates, we may not be able to finance the purchase of properties. If we place mortgage debt on properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance the properties when the loans become due, or of being unable to refinance on favorable terms. If interest rates are higher when we refinance the properties, our income could be reduced. If any of these events occur, our cash flow would be reduced. This, in turn, would reduce cash available for distribution to you and may hinder our ability to raise more capital by issuing more stock or by borrowing more money.

24



We may not be able to access financing sources on attractive terms, which could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan.
We may finance our assets over the long term through a variety of means, including credit facilities, issuance of commercial mortgage-backed securities, and other structured financings. Our ability to execute this strategy will depend on various conditions in the markets for financing in this manner that are beyond our control, including lack of liquidity and greater credit spreads. We cannot be certain that these markets will remain an efficient source of long‑term financing for our assets. If our strategy is not viable, we will have to find alternative forms of long‑term financing for our assets. This could subject us to more recourse indebtedness and the risk that debt service on less efficient forms of financing would require a larger portion of our cash flows, thereby reducing cash available for distribution to our stockholders and funds available for operations, as well as for future business opportunities.
Disruptions in the financial and real estate markets could adversely affect the multifamily property sector’s ability to obtain financing from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which could adversely impact us.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are major sources of financing for the multifamily sector. In the past, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have reported substantial losses and required significant amounts of additional capital. These losses coupled with the credit market’s poor perception of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, add to the considerable uncertainty surrounding the capital structure of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In response to the deteriorating financial condition of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the credit market disruption that begin in 2007, the U.S. Congress and Treasury undertook a series of actions to stabilize these government-sponsored enterprises and the financial markets. Pursuant to legislation enacted in 2008, the U.S. government placed both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under its conservatorship. Despite additional funding for both government-sponsored entities, the U.S. government has stated that it remains committed to reducing their portfolios. In August 2012, the U.S. Treasury modified its investment in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to accelerate the reduction of Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s investment portfolios and to require a sweep of all quarterly profits generated by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In May 2014, the U.S. Senate Banking Committee approved legislation to wind down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and redesign the U.S. mortgage finance system, which legislation has to date not been acted on in the broader Senate. If new U.S. government legislation or regulations (i) heighten Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s underwriting standards, (ii) adversely affect interest rates and (iii) continue to reduce the amount of capital they can make available to the multifamily sector, it could reduce or remove entirely a vital resource for multifamily financing. Any potential reduction in loans, guarantees and credit enhancement arrangements from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could jeopardize the effectiveness of the multifamily sector’s available financing and decrease the amount of available liquidity and credit that could be used to acquire and diversify our portfolio of multifamily assets as well as dispose of our multifamily assets upon our liquidation.
Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
When providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that affect our distribution and operating policies and our ability to incur additional debt. Loan documents we enter into may contain covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage the property, discontinue insurance coverage or replace Resource Real Estate Opportunity Advisor II as our advisor. These or other limitations may limit our flexibility and our ability to achieve our operating plans.
Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and limit our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
We expect that we will incur indebtedness in the future. Increases in interest rates may increase our interest costs, which would reduce our cash flows and our ability to pay distributions. In addition, if we need to repay existing debt during periods of higher interest rates, we might have to sell one or more of our investments in order to repay the debt, which sale at that time might not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments.
We have broad authority to incur debt, and high debt levels could hinder our ability to make distributions and decrease the value of your investment.
Our charter limits our leverage to 300% of our net assets; we may exceed this limit with the approval of the Conflicts Committee of our Board of Directors. High debt levels would cause us to incur higher interest charges and higher debt service payments and may also be accompanied by restrictive covenants. These factors could limit the amount of cash we have available to distribute and could result in a decline in the value of your investment.

25



Federal Income Tax Risks
Our failure to continue to qualify as a REIT would subject us to federal income tax and reduce cash available for distribution to stockholders.
We elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2014. We intend to continue to operate in a manner so as to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which only a limited number of judicial and administrative interpretations exist. Even an inadvertent or technical mistake could jeopardize our REIT status. Our continued qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. Moreover, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for us to continue to qualify as a REIT. If we fail to continue to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject to federal and applicable state and local income tax on our taxable income at corporate rates, in which case we might be required to borrow or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net income available for investment or distribution to you because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer qualify for the dividends-paid deduction and we would no longer be required to make distributions. Furthermore, if we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year for which we have elected to be taxed as a REIT, we would generally be unable to elect REIT status for the four taxable years following the year in which our REIT status is lost.
Complying with REIT requirements may force us to borrow funds to make distributions to you or otherwise depend on external sources of capital to fund such distributions.
To continue to qualify as a REIT, we are required to distribute annually at least 90% of our taxable income, subject to certain adjustments, to our stockholders. To the extent that we satisfy the distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on our undistributed taxable income. In addition, we may elect to retain and pay income tax on our net long-term capital gain. In that case, if we so elect, a stockholder would be taxed on its proportionate share of our undistributed long-term gain and would receive a credit or refund for its proportionate share of the tax we paid. A stockholder, including a tax-exempt or foreign stockholder, would have to file a federal income tax return to claim that credit or refund. Furthermore, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we distribute to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under federal tax laws.
From time-to-time, we may generate taxable income greater than our net income for GAAP. In addition, our taxable income may be greater than our cash flow available for distribution to you as a result of, among other things, investments in assets that generate taxable income in advance of the corresponding cash flow from the assets (for instance, if a borrower defers the payment of interest in cash pursuant to a contractual right or otherwise).
If we do not have other funds available in the situations described in the preceding paragraphs, we could be required to borrow funds on unfavorable terms, sell investments at disadvantageous prices or find another alternative source of funds to make distributions sufficient to enable us to distribute enough of our taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity.
Because of the distribution requirement, it is unlikely that we will be able to fund all future capital needs, including capital needs in connection with investments, from cash retained from operations. As a result, to fund future capital needs, we likely will have to rely on third-party sources of capital, including both debt and equity financing, which may or may not be available on favorable terms or at all. Our access to third-party sources of capital will depend upon a number of factors, including our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions.
Despite our qualification for taxation as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may be subject to other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow and our ability to make distributions to you.
Despite our qualification for taxation as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income or property. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for distribution to you. For instance:
In order to continue to qualify as a REIT, we must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which is determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain for this purpose) to you.
To the extent that we satisfy the distribution requirement but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on the undistributed income.
We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which distributions we pay in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years.

26



If we have net income from the sale of foreclosure property that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business or other non-qualifying income from foreclosure property, we must pay a tax on that income at the highest corporate income tax rate.
If we sell an asset, other than foreclosure property, that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business and do not qualify for a safe harbor in the Internal Revenue Code, our gain would be subject to the 100% “prohibited transaction” tax.
Any domestic taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS, of ours will be subject to federal corporate income tax on its income, and on any non-arm’s-length transactions between us and any TRS, for instance, excessive rents charged to a TRS could be subject to a 100% tax.
We may be subject to tax on income from certain activities conducted as a result of taking title to collateral.
We may be subject to state or local income, property and transfer taxes, such as mortgage recording taxes.

Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities or liquidate otherwise attractive investments.
To continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to stockholders and the ownership of our stock. As discussed above, we may be required to make distributions to our stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Additionally, we may be unable to pursue investments that would be otherwise attractive to us in order to satisfy the requirements for qualifying as a REIT.
We must also ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified real estate assets, including certain mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets can consist of the securities of any one issuer (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) and no more than 20% of the value of our gross assets (25% for tax years ending before 2018) may be represented by securities of one or more TRSs. Finally, for the taxable years after 2015, no more than 25% of our assets may consist of debt investments that are issued by “publicly offered REITs” and would not otherwise be treated as qualifying real estate assets. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct such failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter to avoid losing our REIT status and suffering adverse tax consequences, unless certain relief provisions apply. As a result, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of profit maximization and may require us to liquidate investments from our portfolio, or refrain from making, otherwise attractive investments. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to stockholders.
Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively.
The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code may limit our ability to hedge our operations effectively. Our aggregate gross income from non-qualifying hedges, fees and certain other non-qualifying sources cannot exceed 5% of our annual gross income. As a result, we might have to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a TRS. Any hedging income earned by a TRS would be subject to federal, state and local income tax at regular corporate rates. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities or expose us to greater risks associated with interest rate or other changes than we would otherwise incur.
Liquidation of assets may jeopardize our REIT qualification.
To continue to qualify as a REIT, we must comply with requirements regarding our assets and our sources of income. If we are compelled to liquidate our investments to satisfy our obligations to our lenders, we may be unable to comply with these requirements, ultimately jeopardizing our qualification as a REIT, or we may be subject to a 100% prohibited transaction tax on any resulting gain if we sell assets that are treated as dealer property or inventory.
The prohibited transactions tax may limit our ability to engage in transactions, including disposition of assets and certain methods of securitizing loans, which would be treated as sales for federal income tax purposes.
A REIT’s net income from prohibited transactions is subject to a 100% tax. In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of dealer property, other than foreclosure property, but including loans held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. We might be subject to the prohibited transaction tax if we were to dispose of or securitize loans in a manner that is treated as a sale of the loans, for federal income tax purposes. In order to avoid the prohibited transactions tax, we may choose not to engage in certain sales of loans and may limit the structures we use for any securitization financing transactions, even though such sales or structures might otherwise be beneficial to us. Additionally, we may be subject to the prohibited transaction tax upon a disposition of real property. Although a safe-harbor exception to prohibited transaction treatment is available, we cannot assure you that we can comply with such safe harbor or that we will avoid owning property that may be

27



characterized as held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our trade or business. Consequently, we may choose not to engage in certain sales of real property or may conduct such sales through a TRS.
It may be possible to reduce the impact of the prohibited transaction tax by conducting certain activities through a TRS. However, to the extent that we engage in such activities through a TRS, the income associated with such activities will be subject to a corporate income tax. In addition, the IRS may attempt to ignore or otherwise recast such activities in order to impose a prohibited transaction tax on us, and there can be no assurance that such recast will not be successful.
We also may not be able to use secured financing structures that would create taxable mortgage pools, other than in a TRS or through a subsidiary REIT.
We may recognize substantial amounts of REIT taxable income, which we would be required to distribute to you, in a year in which we are not profitable under GAAP principles or other economic measures.
We may recognize substantial amounts of REIT taxable income in years in which we are not profitable under GAAP or other economic measures as a result of the differences between GAAP and tax accounting methods. For instance, certain of our assets will be marked-to-market for GAAP purposes but not for tax purposes, which could result in losses for GAAP purposes that are not recognized in computing our REIT taxable income. Additionally, we may deduct our capital losses only to the extent of our capital gains in computing our REIT taxable income for a given taxable year. Consequently, we could recognize substantial amounts of REIT taxable income and would be required to distribute such income to you, in a year in which we are not profitable under GAAP or other economic measures.
We may distribute our common stock in a taxable distribution, in which case our stockholders may sell shares of our common stock to pay tax on such distributions, and our stockholders may receive less in cash than the amount of the dividend that is taxable.
We may make taxable distributions that are payable in cash and common stock. The IRS has issued private letter rulings to other REITs treating certain distributions that are paid partly in cash and partly in stock as taxable distributions that would satisfy the REIT annual distribution requirement and qualify for the dividends paid deduction for federal income tax purposes. Those rulings may be relied upon only by taxpayers to whom they were issued, but we could request a similar ruling from the IRS. Accordingly, it is unclear whether and to what extent we will be able to make taxable distributions payable in cash and common stock. If we made a taxable dividend payable in cash and common stock, taxable stockholders receiving such distributions will be required to include the dividend as taxable income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for federal income tax purposes. As a result, our stockholders may be required to pay income tax with respect to such distributions in excess of the cash distributions received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the common stock that it receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount recorded in earnings with respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of our common stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to certain non-U.S. stockholders, we may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax with respect to such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such dividend that is payable in common stock.
REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan.
We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (which is determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain for this purpose) in order to continue to qualify as a REIT. We intend to make distributions to our stockholders to comply with the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax. We may be required to make distributions to stockholders at times when it would be more advantageous to reinvest cash in our business or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.
Distributions paid by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates that apply to other corporate distributions.
The maximum tax rate for “qualified dividends” paid by corporations to non-corporate stockholders is currently 20%. Distributions paid by REITs, however, generally are taxed at ordinary income rates (subject to a maximum rate of 37.0% for non-corporate stockholders, provided individuals may be able to deduct 20% of income received as ordinary REIT dividends, thus reducing the maximum effective federal income tax rate on such dividends), rather than the preferential rate applicable to qualified dividends.
Legislative or regulatory tax changes could adversely affect us or stockholders.
Changes recently made to the U.S. tax laws could have a negative impact on our business.
The President signed a tax reform bill into law on December 22, 2017 (the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”). Among other things, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act:
Reduces the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% (including with respect to our taxable REIT subsidiary);

28



Reduces the rate of U.S. federal withholding tax on distributions made to non-U.S. stockholders by a REIT that are attributable to gains from the sale or exchange of U.S. real property interests from 35% to 21%; 
Allows an immediate 100% deduction of the cost of certain capital asset investments (generally excluding real estate assets), subject to a phase-down of the deduction percentage over time;
Changes the recovery periods for certain real property and building improvements (for example, to 15 years for qualified improvement property under the modified accelerated cost recovery system, and to 30 years (previously 40 years) for residential real property and 20 years (previously 40 years) for qualified improvement property under the alternative depreciation system);
Restricts the deductibility of interest expense by businesses (generally, to 30% of the business’ adjusted taxable income) except, among others, real property businesses electing out of such restriction; we have not yet determined whether we and/or our subsidiaries can and/or will make such an election;
Requires the use of the less favorable alternative depreciation system to depreciate real property in the event a real property business elects to avoid the interest deduction restriction above;
Restricts the benefits of like-kind exchanges that defer capital gains for tax purposes to exchanges of real property;
Permanently repeals the “technical termination” rule for partnerships, meaning sales or exchanges of the interests in a partnership will be less likely to, among other things, terminate the taxable year of, and restart the depreciable lives of assets held by, such partnership for tax purposes;
Requires accrual method taxpayers to take certain amounts in income no later than the taxable year in which such income is taken into account as revenue in an applicable financial statement prepared under GAAP, which, with respect to certain leases, could accelerate the inclusion of rental income; 
Eliminates the federal corporate alternative minimum tax; 
Reduces the highest marginal income tax rate for individuals to 37% from 39.6% (excluding, in each case, the 3.8% Medicare tax on net investment income);
Generally allows a deduction for individuals equal to 20% of certain income from pass-through entities, including ordinary dividends distributed by a REIT (excluding capital gain dividends and qualified dividend income), generally resulting in a maximum effective federal income tax rate applicable to such dividends of 29.6% compared to 37% (excluding, in each case, the 3.8% Medicare tax on net investment income); and
Limits certain deductions for individuals, including deductions for state and local income taxes, and eliminates deductions for miscellaneous itemized deductions (including certain investment expenses).                         
Many of the provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, in particular those affecting individual taxpayers, expire at the end of 2025.  As a result of the changes to U.S. federal tax laws implemented by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, our taxable income and the amount of distributions to our stockholders required in order to maintain our REIT status, and our relative tax advantage as a REIT, could change.  As a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to our stockholders annually.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is a complex revision to the U.S. federal income tax laws with various impacts on different categories of taxpayers and industries, and will require subsequent rulemaking and interpretation in a number of areas. The long-term impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on the overall economy, government revenues, our tenants, us, and the real estate industry cannot be reliably predicted at this time. Furthermore, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act may negatively impact certain of our tenants’ operating results, financial condition, and future business plans. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act may also result in reduced government revenues, and therefore reduced government spending, which may negatively impact some of our tenants that rely on government funding. There can be no assurance that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act will not negatively impact our operating results, financial condition, and future business operations.
Retirement Plan Risks Retirement Plan Risks
If the fiduciary of an employee benefit plan subject to ERISA (such as a profit sharing, Section 401(k) or pension plan) or an owner of a retirement arrangement subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code (such as an IRA) fails to meet the fiduciary and other standards under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code as a result of an investment in our stock, the fiduciary could be subject to penalties and other sanctions.
There are special considerations that apply to employee benefit plans subject to ERISA (such as profit sharing, Section 401(k) or pension plans) and other retirement plans or accounts subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code (such as an IRA) that are investing in our shares. Fiduciaries and IRA owners investing the assets of such a plan or account in our common stock should satisfy themselves that:

29



the investment is consistent with their fiduciary and other obligations under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code;
the investment is made in accordance with the documents and instruments governing the plan or IRA, including the plan’s or account’s investment policy;
the investment satisfies the prudence and diversification requirements of Sections 404(a)(1)(B) and 404(a)(1)(C) of ERISA and other applicable provisions of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code;
the investment in our shares, for which no public market currently exists, is consistent with the liquidity needs of the plan or IRA;
the investment will not produce an unacceptable amount of “unrelated business taxable income” for the plan or IRA;
our stockholders will be able to comply with the requirements under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code to value the assets of the plan or IRA annually; and
the investment will not constitute a prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code.

With respect to the annual valuation requirements described above, we will provide an estimated value for our shares annually. We can make no claim whether such estimated value will or will not satisfy the applicable annual valuation requirements under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. The Department of Labor or the Internal Revenue Service may determine that a plan fiduciary or an IRA custodian is required to take further steps to determine the value of our common stock. In the absence of an appropriate determination of value, a plan fiduciary or an IRA custodian may be subject to damages, penalties or other sanctions. See Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities - Market Information” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Failure to satisfy the fiduciary standards of conduct and other applicable requirements of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code may result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties and could subject the fiduciary to claims for damages or for equitable remedies, including liability for investment losses. In addition, if an investment in our shares constitutes a prohibited transaction under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code, the fiduciary or IRA owner who authorized or directed the investment may be subject to the imposition of excise taxes with respect to the amount invested. In addition, the investment transaction must be undone. In the case of a prohibited transaction involving an IRA owner, the IRA may be disqualified as a tax-exempt account and all of the assets of the IRA may be deemed distributed and subjected to tax. ERISA plan fiduciaries and IRA owners should consult with counsel before making an investment in our common stock.
If our assets are deemed to be plan assets, the Advisor and we may be exposed to liabilities under Title I of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code.
In some circumstances where an ERISA plan holds an interest in an entity, the assets of the entity are deemed to be ERISA plan assets unless an exception applies. This is known as the “look-through rule.” Under those circumstances, the obligations and other responsibilities of plan sponsors, plan fiduciaries and plan administrators, and of parties in interest and disqualified persons, under Title I of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code, may be applicable, and there may be liability under these and other provisions of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. We believe that our assets should not be treated as plan assets because the shares should qualify as “publicly-offered securities” that are exempt from the look-through rules under applicable Treasury Regulations. We note, however, that because certain limitations are imposed upon the transferability of shares so that we may qualify as a REIT, and perhaps for other reasons, it is possible that this exemption may not apply. If that is the case, and if the Advisor or we are exposed to liability under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code, our performance and results of operations could be adversely affected. Prior to making an investment in us, you should consult with your legal and other advisor's concerning the impact of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code on your investment and our performance.
If you invest in our shares through an IRA or other retirement plan, you may be limited in your ability to withdraw required minimum distributions.

If you establish an IRA or other retirement plan through which you invest in our shares, federal law may require you to withdraw required minimum distributions ("RMDs") from such plan in the future. Our share redemption program limits the amount of redemptions that can be made in a given year. Additionally, you will not be eligible to have your shares redeemed until you have held your shares for at least one year. As a result, you may not be able to have your shares redeemed at a time in which you need liquidity to satisfy the RMD requirements under your IRA or other retirement plan. Even if you are able to have your shares redeemed, such redemption may be at a price less than the price at which the shares were initially purchased, depending on how long you have held your shares. If you fail to withdraw RMDs from your IRA or other retirement plan, you may be subject to certain tax penalties.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.

30



ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2017, we owned 18 multifamily properties encompassing approximately 5.2 million rentable square feet and 5,519 units. We acquired these properties from third parties unaffiliated with us or our Advisor. The following is a summary of our real estate properties as of December 31, 2017:
Multifamily Community Name
 
City and State
 
Number of Units
 
Date of Acquisition
 
Purchase Price (1) (in thousands)
 
Year of Construction
 
Average Unit Size (Sq. Ft.)
 
Physical Occupancy Rate (2)
 
Effective Monthly Revenue per Unit (3)
 
Mortgage Debt Secured by Property (in thousands)
Adair off Addison
 
Dallas, TX
 
152

 
6/4/2014
 
$
9,500

 
1980
 
856

 
88.8
%
 
$
1,166

 
$
7,650

Overton Trails Apartment Homes
 
Fort Worth, TX
 
360

 
12/19/2014
 
$
47,000

 
1999
 
952

 
91.4
%
 
$
1,596

 
$
30,485

Uptown Buckhead
 
Atlanta, GA
 
216

 
3/30/2015
 
$
32,500

 
1989
 
739

 
88.4
%
 
$
1,424

 
$
20,200

Crosstown at Chapel Hill
 
Chapel Hill, NC
 
411

 
5/19/2015
 
$
46,750

 
1990/1996
 
1,005

 
86.1
%
 
$
1,150

 
$
32,000

The Brookwood
 
Homewood, AL
 
274

 
8/21/2015
 
$
30,050

 
1968/1972
 
1,051

 
92.0
%
 
$
1,122

 
$
21,342

Adair off Addison Apartment Homes
 
Dallas, TX
 
200

 
8/27/2015
 
$
21,250

 
1979
 
1,098

 
90.5
%
 
$
1,290

 
$
17,850

1000 Spalding Crossing
 
Atlanta, GA
 
252

 
9/24/2015
 
$
41,000

 
1995
 
989

 
94.0
%
 
$
1,406

 
$
24,600

Montclair Terrace
 
Portland, OR
 
188

 
10/29/2015
 
$
32,750

 
1968
 
918

 
88.3
%
 
$
1,385

 
$
21,300

Grand Reserve
 
Naperville, IL
 
319

 
12/18/2015
 
$
66,700

 
1997
 
1,025

 
90.3
%
 
$
1,776

 
$
42,832

Verdant Apartment Homes
 
Boulder, CO
 
216

 
12/18/2015
 
$
65,200

 
1991
 
850

 
87.0
%
 
$
2,006

 
$
37,300

Arcadia Apartment Homes
 
Centennial, CO
 
300

 
1/22/2016
 
$
60,250

 
1984
 
977

 
86.7
%
 
$
1,662

 
$
40,200

Riverlodge
 
Austin, TX
 
498

 
3/23/2016
 
$
57,000

 
2001
 
993

 
91.4
%
 
$
1,227

 
$
28,715

Breckenridge
 
Portland, OR
 
357

 
5/16/2016
 
$
81,500

 
1985
 
763

 
82.1
%
 
$
1,515

 
$
52,975

Santa Rosa
 
Irving, TX
 
476

 
6/28/2016
 
$
70,000

 
1991
 
966

 
92.6
%
 
$
1,353

 
$
45,700

Windbrooke
 
Buffalo Grove, IL
 
236

 
12/22/2016
 
$
48,250

 
1986
 
903

 
94.1
%
 
$
1,720

 
$
38,320

The Woods of Burnsville
 
Burnsville, MN
 
400

 
12/23/2016
 
$
51,000

 
1984
 
953

 
88.5
%
 
$
1,246

 
$
38,250

Indigo Creek
 
Glendale, AZ
 
408

 
4/4/2017
 
$
55,200

 
1998
 
983

 
92.2
%
 
$
1,134

 
$
40,789

Martin's Point
 
Lombard, IL
 
256

 
10/31/2017
 
$
38,250

 
1989
 
789

 
96.1
%
 
$
960

 
$
29,990

 
(1)
Purchase price excludes closing costs and acquisition expenses.
(2)
Physical occupancy rate is defined as the units occupied as of December 31, 2017 divided by the total number of residential units
(3)
Effective monthly rental revenue per unit has been calculated based on the leases in effect as of December 31, 2017, adjusted for any tenant concessions, such as free rent. Effective monthly rental revenue per unit only includes base rents for occupied units, including affordable housing payments and subsidies. It does not include other charges for storage, parking, pets, cleaning, clubhouse or other miscellaneous amounts.



31



ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we are party to legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any legal proceedings of which the outcome is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition, nor are we aware of any such legal proceedings contemplated by governmental authorities.
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.


32



PART II

ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Stockholder Information
As of March 23, 2018, we had 61,185,365 shares of common stock outstanding held by a total of 12,464 stockholders.
Estimated Value Per Share
On March 28, 2018, our Board of Directors approved an estimated value per share of the Company’s common stock of $9.08 based on the estimated market value of the Company’s portfolio of investments as of December 31, 2017. We are providing this estimated value per share to assist broker-dealers that participated in our public offerings in meeting their customer account statement reporting obligations under National Association of Securities Dealers Conduct Rule 2340 as required by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). This valuation was performed in accordance with the provisions of Practice Guideline 2013-01, Valuations of Publicly Registered Non-Listed REITs, issued by the Investment Program Association (“IPA”) in April 2013 (the “IPA Valuation Guidelines”).
Our Conflicts Committee, composed solely of all of our independent directors, is responsible for the oversight of the valuation process, including the review and approval of the valuation process and methodology used to determine the estimated value per share, the consistency of the valuation and appraisal methodologies with real estate industry standards and practices and the reasonableness of the assumptions used in the valuations and appraisals. With the approval of the conflicts committee, we engaged Duff & Phelps, LLC (“Duff & Phelps”) to provide a calculation of the range in estimated value per share of our common stock as of December 31, 2017. Duff & Phelps held discussions with senior management of our Advisor, and conducted appraisals, investigations, research, review and analysis as it deemed necessary. Duff & Phelps based this range in estimated value per share upon its estimates of the “as is” market values of our interests in 18 multifamily properties. Duff & Phelps made adjustments to the aggregate estimated values of our investments to reflect balance sheet assets and liabilities provided by the our management, before calculating a range of estimated values based on the number of outstanding shares of the our common stock as of December 31, 2017. The valuation report Duff & Phelps prepared (the “Valuation Report”) summarized the key inputs and assumptions involved in the appraisal of each of our investments. Duff & Phelps’s valuation was designed to follow the prescribed methodologies of the IPA Valuation Guidelines. The methodologies and assumptions used to determine the estimated value of our investments are described further below.
Upon the conflicts committee’s receipt and review of the Valuation Report and in light of other factors considered by our conflicts committee and the conflicts committee’s own extensive knowledge of our assets and liabilities, the conflicts committee concluded that the range in estimated value per share of $8.31 to $9.93, with an approximate midpoint value of $9.08 per share, as indicated in the Valuation Report, was appropriate. Upon recommendation by the Advisor, the Conflicts Committee recommended to our board of directors that it adopt $9.08 as the estimated value per share of our common stock, which approximates the midpoint value. Our board of directors unanimously agreed to accept the recommendation of the conflicts committee and approved $9.08 as the estimated value per share of our common stock, which determination is ultimately and solely the responsibility of the board of directors.

33



The following table summarizes the material components of the December 31, 2017 net asset value (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
 
Net Asset Value as of December 31, 2017
 
Net Asset Value as of December 31, 2017 (per share)
Investments
 
$
1,054,100

 
$
17.34

Cash
 
76,895

 
1.27

Other Assets
 
1,418

 
0.02

Mortgage Notes Payable and Credit Facilities
 
(564,556
)
 
(9.29
)
Other Liabilities
 
(15,922
)
 
(0.26
)
Net asset value
 
$
551,935

 
$
9.08


The table below sets forth the calculation of our estimated net asset value per share as of December 31, 2017, as well as the calculation of our prior estimated net asset value per share as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
Change in
 
 
Net Asset Value per Share
 
Net Asset Value per Share (1)
 
Estimated Value per Share
Investments (2)
 
$
17.34

 
$
15.20

 
$
2.14

Cash (2)
 
1.27

 
1.88

 
(0.61
)
Other Assets (2)
 
0.02

 
0.04

 
(0.02
)
Mortgage Notes Payable and Credit Facilities (2)
 
(9.29
)
 
(7.75
)
 
(1.54
)
Other Liabilities
 
(0.26
)
 
(0.27
)
 
0.01

 
 
$
9.08

 
$
9.10

 
$
(0.02
)
(1)     For information relating to the December 31, 2016 net asset value per share and the assumptions and methodologies used by Duff & Phelps and our management, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2017.
(2)    The increase in Investments, Mortgage Notes Payable and Credit Facilities, Other Liabilities, and the decrease in Cash and Other Assets were primarily the result of the acquisitions of Arcadia Apartment Homes, Riverlodge, Breckenridge, Santa Rosa, Windbrooke Crossing and The Woods at Burnsville in 2016.
As with any valuation, the methodologies used are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not be accurate or complete. Different parties with different assumptions and estimates could derive a different estimated value per share, and these differences could be significant. In particular, due in part to (i) the high concentration of our total assets in real estate, and (ii) the number of shares of our common stock outstanding, even modest changes in key assumptions made in appraising our real estate properties could have a very significant impact on the estimated value of our shares. The estimated value per share is not audited and does not represent the fair value of our assets less the fair value of our liabilities according to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), nor does it represent a liquidation value of the our assets and liabilities or the amount our shares of common stock would trade at on a national securities exchange. The estimated value per share does not reflect a discount for the fact that we are externally managed, nor does it reflect a real estate portfolio premium/discount versus the sum of the individual property values. The estimated value per share also does not take into account estimated disposition costs and fees for real estate properties, debt prepayment penalties that could apply upon the prepayment of certain of our debt obligations or the impact of restrictions on the assumption of debt.
Methodology
Our goal in calculating an estimated value per share is to arrive at a value that is reasonable and supportable using what deems to be appropriate valuation and appraisal methodologies and assumptions and a process that is in accordance with the IPA Valuation Guidelines. The following is a summary of the valuation and appraisal methodologies used to calculate the estimated value per share:

34



Real Estate
Independent Valuation Firm
Duff & Phelps was recommended by the Advisor, and approved by the conflicts committee. Duff & Phelps is engaged in the business of appraising commercial real estate properties and is not affiliated with the Company or the Advisor. Duff & Phelps and its affiliates may from time to time in the future perform other commercial real estate, appraisal and valuation services for us and our affiliates in transactions related to the properties that are the subjects of the appraisals, so long as such other services do not adversely affect the independence of the applicable Duff & Phelps appraiser as certified in the applicable appraisal reports.
The compensation Duff & Phelps received for its appraisal of our real estate properties was based on the scope of work and was not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of us, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of the appraisal. The appraisal was performed in accordance with the Code of Ethics & Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, or USPAP, the real estate appraisal industry standards created by The Appraisal Foundation. The Valuation Report was reviewed, approved and signed by an individual with the professional designation of MAI (Member of the Appraisal Institute). The use of the Valuation Report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. In preparing the Valuation Report, Duff & Phelps did not, and was not requested to, solicit third party indications of interest for our common stock in connection with possible purchases thereof or the acquisition of all or any part of us.
Duff & Phelps collected all reasonably available material information that it deemed relevant in estimating the market value of our real estate properties and other investments. In conducting its investigations and analyses, Duff & Phelps took into account customary and accepted financial and commercial procedures and considerations as it deemed relevant. Although Duff & Phelps reviewed information supplied or otherwise made available by us or the Advisor for reasonableness, each assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all such information and of all information supplied or otherwise made available to it by any other party and did not independently verify any such information. Duff & Phelps relied on management or the Advisor to advise it promptly if any information previously provided became inaccurate or was required to be updated during the period of its review.
In performing its analysis of our real estate properties and other investments, Duff & Phelps made numerous other assumptions as of various points in time. The Valuation Report, including the analyses, opinions and conclusions set forth in such report, are qualified by the assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth in the Valuation Report.
Real Estate Valuation
Duff & Phelps estimated the “as is” market value of each of our real estate properties owned as of December 31, 2017, using various methodologies, including the direct capitalization approach, discounted cash flow analyses and sales comparison approach, and relied primarily on the discounted cash flow analyses for our properties. The sales comparison approach was utilized as a secondary approach to value. The discounted cash flow analyses focus on the operating cash flows expected from the properties and the anticipated proceeds of hypothetical sales at the end of assumed holding periods, which are then discounted to their present value. Discounted cash flow analyses were utilized for all 18 of our properties as they were either recently acquired and either not yet stabilized or are currently undergoing renovations. Real estate is currently carried in our financial statements at its amortized cost basis. Duff & Phelps performed its appraisals as of December 31, 2017.
The following summarizes the range of terminal capitalization rates and discount rates used to arrive at the estimated market values of our 18 properties:
 
 
Range in Values
 
Weighted Average Basis
Terminal Capitalization Rate
 
4.75% to 5.75%
 
5.17
%
Discount Rate
 
6.00% to 8.25%
 
6.78
%
While we believe that Duff & Phelps’ assumptions and inputs are reasonable, a change in these assumptions and inputs would significantly impact the calculation of the appraised value of our real estate properties and other assets and, thus, its estimated value per share. As of December 31, 2017, the majority of our real estate assets have non-stabilized occupancies. Appraisals may provide a sense of the value of the investment, but any appraisal of the property will be based on numerous estimates, judgments and assumptions that significantly affect the appraised value of the underlying property. An appraisal of a non-stabilized property, in particular, involves a high degree of subjectivity due to higher vacancy levels and uncertainties with respect to future market

35



rental rates and timing of lease-up and stabilization. Accordingly, different assumptions may materially change the appraised value of the property.
The total appraised value of our real estate properties using the appraisal methodologies described above was $551.9 million, compared to an aggregate purchase price, adjusted for related capital expenditures through December 31, 2017 of $330.7 million.
The table below illustrates the impact on the estimated value per share if the overall capitalization rates, terminal capitalization rates or discount rates were adjusted by 25 basis points, and assuming all other factors remain unchanged, with respect to the real estate properties referenced in the table above. Additionally, the table below illustrates the impact on the estimated value per share if the overall capitalization rates, terminal capitalization rates or discount rates were adjusted by 5% in accordance with the IPA Valuation Guidelines, assuming all other factors remain unchanged. The table is only hypothetical to illustrate possible results if only one change in assumptions was made, with all other factors held constant. Further, each of these assumptions could change by more than 25 basis points or 5%.
 
 
Change in Estimated Value per Share
 
 
Increase of 25 Basis Points
 
Decrease of 25 Basis Points
 
Increase of 5%
 
Decrease of 5%
Overall Capitalization Rate
 
N/A

 
N/A

 
N/A

 
N/A

Terminal Capitalization Rate
 
$
8.42

 
$
9.82

 
$
8.29

 
$
9.96

Discount Rate
 
$
9.01

 
$
9.15

 
$
9.00

 
$
9.18

Other Assets and Liabilities
Duff & Phelps made adjustments to the aggregate estimated values of our investments to reflect balance sheet assets and liabilities provided by our management.
Limitations of Estimated Value Per Share
As mentioned above, we are providing this estimated value per share to assist broker dealers that participated in our public offering in meeting their customer account statement reporting obligations. This valuation was performed in accordance with the provisions of the IPA Valuation Guidelines. The estimated value per share set forth above will first appear on the March 31, 2018 customer account statements that will be mailed in April 2018. As with any valuation methodology, the methodologies used are based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that may not be accurate or complete. Different parties with different assumptions and estimates could derive a different estimated value per share, and this difference could be significant. The estimated value per share is not audited and does not represent the fair value of our assets or liabilities according to GAAP.
Accordingly, with respect to the estimated value per share, we can give no assurance that:
a stockholder would be able to resell his or her shares at the estimated value per share;
a stockholder would ultimately realize distributions per share equal to our estimated value per share upon liquidation of our assets and settlement of its liabilities or a sale of the Company;
our shares of common stock would trade at the estimated value per share on a national securities exchange;
a third party would offer the estimated value per share in an arm’s-length transaction to purchase all or substantially all of our shares of common stock;
another independent third-party appraiser or third-party valuation firm would agree with the our estimated value per share; or
the methodology used to calculate our estimated value per share would be acceptable to FINRA or for compliance with ERISA reporting requirements.
Further, the estimated value per share as of December 31, 2017 is based on the estimated value of our investments as of December 31, 2017. We did not make any adjustments to the valuation for the impact of other transactions occurring subsequent to December 31, 2017, including, but not limited to, (i) the issuance of common stock under the distribution reinvestment plan, (ii) net operating income earned and distributions declared, (iii) the redemption of shares and (iv) the potential conversion of convertible stock into common stock. The value of our shares will fluctuate over time in response to developments related to

36



individual assets in our portfolio and the management of those assets and in response to the real estate and finance markets. Because of, among other factors, our high concentration of total assets in real estate and the number of shares of our common stock outstanding, any change in the value of individual assets in the portfolio, particularly changes affecting our real estate properties, could have a very significant impact on the value of our shares. The estimated value per share does not reflect a discount for the fact that we are externally managed, nor does it reflect a real estate portfolio premium/discount versus the sum of the individual property values. The estimated value per share also does not take into account estimated disposition costs and fees for real estate properties, debt prepayment penalties that could apply upon the prepayment of certain of our debt obligations or the impact of restrictions on the assumption of debt.

Distribution Reinvestment Plan

In accordance with our distribution reinvestment plan, participants in the distribution reinvestment plan acquire shares of common stock under the plan at a price equal to 95% of the current estimated value per share of our common stock. Commencing on the next distribution reinvestment plan purchase date, which is on April 2, 2018, participants will acquire shares of our common stock under the plan at a price equal to $8.63 per share.

As provided under the distribution reinvestment plan, for a participant to terminate participation effective for a particular distribution, we must have received notice of termination from the participant at least ten business days prior to the last day of the month to which the distribution relates. If a participant wishes to terminate participation in the distribution reinvestment plan effective for the April 2018 purchase date, participants must notify us in writing of such decision, and we must receive the notice by the close of business on April 14, 2018, which is ten business days prior to the last day of April 2017, as provided under the distribution reinvestment plan.

Notice of termination should be sent by facsimile to 877-894-1124 or by mail to c/o Resource Real Estate Opportunity REIT II, Inc., P.O. Box 219169, Kansas City, Missouri 64121.

Share Redemption Program

On March 28, 2018, our Board of Directors approved an estimated value per share of our common stock of $9.08. As a result, the price at which shares will be redeemed under our share redemption program after that date is as follows:

(1) For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least one year, 92.5% of our estimated value per share, or $8.40;

(2) For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least two years, 95.0% of our estimated share value, or $8.63;

(3) For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least three years, 97.5% of our estimated share value, or $8.85; and

(4) For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least four years, 100% of our estimated share value, or $9.08.

For a stockholder’s shares to be eligible for redemption in June 2018 or to withdraw a redemption request, we must receive a written notice from the stockholder or from an authorized representative of the stockholder in good order and on a form approved by us by May 31, 2018.

The complete share redemption program plan document is filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2015 and is available at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities
All securities sold by us during the year ended December 31, 2017 were sold in an offering registered under the Securities Act.
Redemption of Securities
Our board of directors has adopted a share redemption program that may enable stockholders to sell their shares to us after they have held them for at least one year, subject to the significant conditions and limitations of the program. In its sole discretion, our board of directors can amend, suspend or terminate the program upon 30 days’ notice without stockholder approval. Except for redemptions sought upon a stockholder’s death, qualifying disability or confinement to a long-term care facility and prior to the time we established an NAV per share of our common stock, the purchase price for shares redeemed under the redemption program was as follows:

37



For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least one year, 92.5% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us;
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least two years, 95.0% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us;
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least three years, 97.5% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us; and
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least four years, 100% of the price paid to acquire the shares from us.
The purchase price per share for redemptions sought upon a stockholder’s death or qualifying disability or confinement to a long-term care facility, was equal to the average issue price per share of the stockholder’s shares.
The purchase price per share will be adjusted for any stock combinations, splits, recapitalizations and the like with respect to the shares of common stock and reduced by the aggregate amount of net sale or refinance proceeds per share, if any, distributed to the redeeming stockholder prior to the redemption date.

In connection with the approval by our Board of Directors of an estimated value per share of our common stock, the price at which shares were redeemed under our share redemption program was as follows:
               
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least one year, 92.5% of our estimated value per share,
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least two years, 95.0% of our estimated share value;
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least three years, 97.5% of our estimated share value; and
For those shares held by the redeeming stockholder for at least four years, 100% of our estimated share value.

We will not redeem in excess of 5% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the 12-month period immediately prior to the effective date of redemption.  Generally, the cash available for redemption will be limited to proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan plus, if we had positive operating cash flow from the previous fiscal year, 1% of all operating cash flow from the previous fiscal year.  These limitations apply to all redemptions, including redemptions sought upon a stockholder’s death, qualifying disability or confinement to a long-term care facility. 
During the quarter ended December 31, 2017, we redeemed shares as follows:
Period
 
Total Number
of Shares
Redeemed
(1)
 
Average Price Paid per Share
 
Cumulative Number
of Shares Purchased
as Part of a Publicly
Announced Plan or
Program
 (2)
 
Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares
Available That May
Yet Be Redeemed
Under the Program
October 2017
 
 
$—
 
 
(2)
November 2017
 
 
$—
 
 
(2)
December 2017
 
128
 
$8.68
 
773
 
(2)
(1)
All purchases of equity securities by the Company in the three months ended December 31, 2017 were made pursuant to our share redemption program.
(2)
We currently limit the dollar value and number of shares that may be repurchased under the program, as discussed above.
All redemption requests tendered were honored during the year ended December 31, 2017.

38



Distribution Information
For the year ended December 31, 2017, we paid aggregate distributions of $35.8 million, including $15.1 million of distributions paid in cash and $20.7 million of distributions reinvested in shares of common stock through our distribution reinvestment plan. Distributions declared, distributions paid and cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities were as follows for the year ended December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
 
 
Distributions Paid
 
 
 
 
 
Distributions Declared
 
Sources of Distributions Paid
2017
 
Cash
 
Distributions Reinvested (DRIP)
 
Total
 
Cash Provided By (Used In ) Operating Activities - Quarter to Date
 
Cash Provided By (Used In ) Operating Activities - Year to Date
 
Total
 
Per Share
 
Amount Paid from Operating Activities/Percent of Total Distributions Paid
 
Amount Paid from Debt Financing/Percent of Total Distributions Paid
First Quarter
 
$
3,685

 
$
5,090

 
$
8,775

 
$
(1,466
)
 
$
(1,466
)
 
8,954

 
$
0.149589

 
-/-
 
$8,954/100%
Second Quarter
 
3,765

 
5,183

 
8,948

 
(426
)
 
(1,892
)
 
8,995

 
$
0.149589

 
-/-
 
$8,995/100%
Third Quarter
 
3,786

 
5,209

 
8,995

 
1,200

 
(692
)
 
9,062

 
$
0.149589

 
$1,200/13%
 
$7,862/87%
Fourth Quarter
 
3,859

 
5,203

 
9,062

 
2,546

 
1,854

 
9,112

 
$
0.149589

 
$2,546/28%
 
$6,566/72%
Total
 
$
15,095

 
$
20,685


$
35,780

 
$
1,854

 
 
 
$
36,123

 
 
 
 
 
 
We elected to be taxed as a REIT and to operate as a REIT beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2014. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we will be required to make aggregate annual distributions to our common stockholders of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gain). Our Board of Directors may authorize distributions in excess of those required for us to maintain REIT status depending on our financial condition and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant.
Our Board of Directors considers many factors before authorizing a cash distribution, including current and projected cash flow from operations, capital expenditure needs, general financial conditions and REIT qualification requirements. To the extent permitted by Maryland law, we may borrow funds, issue new securities or sell assets to make and cover our declared distributions, all or a portion of which could be deemed a return of capital. We may also fund such distributions from advances from our Advisor or sponsor or from our Advisor's deferral of its asset management fee, although we have no present intention to do so. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of distributions we can fund from sources other than from cash flows from operations.
Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $37.7 million and net cash provided by operating activities was $1.9 million. Our cumulative cash distributions paid and net loss from inception through December 31, 2017 were $84.8 million and $107.8 million, respectively. We have funded our cumulative distributions, which includes net cash distributions and distributions reinvested by stockholders, with cash flow from operating activities and proceeds from debt financing. To the extent that we pay distributions from sources other than our cash flow from operating activities or gains from asset sales, we will have fewer funds available for investment in commercial real estate and real estate-related debt and the overall return to our stockholders may be reduced.
We have not established a minimum distribution level, and our charter does not require that we make distributions to our stockholders. We have and will continue to make distributions with respect to the shares of common stock in sole discretion of the board of directors. No distributions will be made with respect to shares of our convertible stock.
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Selected financial data has been omitted as permitted under rules applicable to smaller reporting companies.



39



ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements of Resource Real Estate Opportunity REIT II, Inc. and the notes thereto.
Overview
We are a Maryland corporation that invests in multifamily assets across the entire spectrum of investments in order to provide investors with growing cash flow and increasing asset values. We have acquired and may continue to acquire (i) underperforming multifamily rental properties which we will renovate and stabilize in order to increase rents, (ii) distressed real estate owned by financial institutions, usually as a result of foreclosure, and non-performing or distressed loans, including first- and second-priority mortgage loans and other loans which we will resolve, and (iii) performing loans, including first- and second-priority mortgage loans and other loans we originate or purchase either directly or with a co-investor or joint venture partner. We believe multiple opportunities exist within the multifamily industry today and will continue to present themselves over the next few years to real estate investors who possess the following characteristics: (i) extensive experience in multifamily investing, (ii) strong management platforms specializing in operational and financial performance optimization, (iii) financial sophistication allowing them to benefit from complex opportunities and (iv) the overall scale and breadth of a national real estate platform in both the equity and debt markets. We may make adjustments to our target portfolio based on real estate market conditions and investment opportunities. We will not forego a good investment because it does not precisely fit our expected portfolio composition. Thus, to the extent that our Advisor presents us with investment opportunities that allow us to meet the requirements to be treated as a REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code, and to maintain our exclusion from regulation as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, our portfolio composition may vary from what we initially expect.
We commenced the public offering of our common stock in February 2014 and terminated the primary portion of the offering in February 2016. We describe this offering in “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” below.
Results of Operations
We were formed on September 28, 2012.  We commenced active real estate operations on June 4, 2014 with the acquisition of our first multi-family property.  As of December 31, 2017, we owned 18 multifamily properties. Our management is not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, favorable, or unfavorable, other than national economic conditions affecting our targeted portfolio, the multifamily residential housing industry and real estate generally, which may reasonably be expected to have a material impact on either capital resources or the revenues or incomes to be derived from the operation of such assets or those that we expect to acquire.

40



Year ended December 31, 2017 Compared to the Year ended December 31, 2016
We expect revenue and expenses to increase in future periods as we acquire additional properties and to decrease to the extent that we dispose of properties. The following table sets forth the results of our operations (in thousands):
 
Years Ended
 
December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
Revenues:
 
 
 
Rental income
$
77,240

 
$
52,928

Total revenues
77,240

 
52,928

 
 
 
 
Expenses:
 
 
 
Rental operating - expenses
13,580

 
11,911

Rental operating - payroll
7,645

 
6,220

Rental operating - real estate taxes
10,412

 
7,336

Subtotal - Rental operating expenses
31,637

 
25,467

Acquisition costs
2,199

 
9,079

Management fees
12,801

 
9,235

General and administrative
8,700

 
9,272

Loss on disposal of assets
963

 
2,516

Depreciation and amortization expense
39,135

 
30,964

Total expenses
95,435

 
86,533

Loss before other income (expense)
(18,195
)
 
(33,605
)
 
 
 
 
Other income (expense):
 
 
 
Interest income
120

 
209

Insurance proceeds in excess of cost basis
148

 
185

Interest expense
(19,764
)
 
(10,950
)
Net loss
$
(37,691
)
 
$
(44,161
)

41



The following table presents the results of operations separated into three categories: the results of operations of the 16 properties we owned for the entirety of both periods presented, properties purchased during either of the periods presented and company level revenues and expenses for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
For the year ended December 31, 2017
 
For the year ended December 31, 2016
 
 
Properties owned both periods
 
Properties purchased during either period
 
Company level
 
Total
 
Properties owned both periods
 
Properties purchased during either period
 
Company level
 
Total
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
 
$
39,034

 
$
38,206

 
$

 
$
77,240

 
$
36,313

 
$
16,615

 
$

 
$
52,928

Total revenues
 
39,034

 
38,206

 

 
77,240

 
36,313

 
16,615

 

 
52,928

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental operating - expenses
 
6,476

 
6,865

 
239

 
13,580

 
7,994

 
3,886

 
31

 
11,911

Rental operating - payroll
 
3,942

 
3,621

 
82

 
7,645

 
4,489

 
1,731

 

 
6,220

Rental operating - real estate taxes
 
5,124

 
5,176

 
112

 
10,412

 
5,301

 
2,147

 
(112
)
 
7,336

Subtotal - Rental operating expenses
 
15,542

 
15,662

 
433

 
31,637

 
17,784

 
7,764

 
(81
)
 
25,467

Acquisition costs
 
6

 
272

 
1,921

 
2,199

 
(149
)
 
816

 
8,412

 
9,079

Management fees
 
1,738

 
1,700

 
9,363

 
12,801

 
1,624

 
719

 
6,892

 
9,235

General and administrative
 
1,461

 
1,416

 
5,823

 
8,700

 
1,803

 
986

 
6,483

 
9,272

Loss on disposal of assets
 
654

 
309

 

 
963

 
593

 
1,923

 

 
2,516

Depreciation and amortization expense
 
18,540

 
20,595

 

 
39,135

 
19,481

 
11,483

 

 
30,964

Total expenses
 
37,941

 
39,954

 
17,540

 
95,435

 
41,136

 
23,691

 
21,706

 
86,533

 Income (loss) before other income (expense)
 
1,093

 
(1,748
)
 
(17,540
)
 
(18,195
)
 
(4,823
)
 
(7,076
)
 
(21,706
)
 
(33,605
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income (expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest income
 
44

 
59

 
17

 
120

 
82

 
53

 
74

 
209

Insurance proceeds in excess of cost basis
 
143

 
5

 

 
148

 
185

 

 

 
185

Interest expense
 
(18,655
)
 
(1,109
)
 

 
(19,764
)
 
(7,534
)
 
(3,416
)
 

 
(10,950
)
Net loss
 
$
(17,375
)
 
$
(2,793
)
 
$
(17,523
)
 
$
(37,691
)
 
$
(12,090
)
 
$
(10,439
)
 
$
(21,632
)
 
$
(44,161
)


42



Revenues: Rental income increased by $24.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase is primarily due to the implementation of our investment strategy to increase monthly rental income and occupancy rates after renovating and stabilizing operations and the acquisition of two additional properties since December 31, 2016, and was primarily comprised of:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in Effective
 
 

 

 
Monthly Revenue
Multifamily Community
 
Rental Increase (in thousands)
 
Change in Occupancy %
 
per Unit (in dollars)
Adair off Addison
 
$
64

 
(5.3
)%
 
60

Overton Trails Apartment Homes
 
696

 
4.2
 %
 
37

Uptown Buckhead
 
305

 
(4.2
)%
 
129

Crosstown at Chapel Hill
 
603

 
(4.4
)%
 
110

The Brookwood
 
19

 
1.5
 %
 
(32
)
Adair off Addison Apartment Homes
 
217

 
2.0
 %
 
24

Montclair
 
335

 
5.7
 %
 
20

1000 Spalding Crossing
 
18

 
(1.4
)%
 
17

Grand Reserve
 
324

 
(0.3
)%
 
56

Verdant Apartment Homes
 
141

 
(2.3
)%
 
83

Arcadia Apartment Homes
 
482

 
(2.0
)%
 
135

Riverlodge
 
1,648

 
2.0
 %
 
(15
)
Breckenridge
 
1,965

 
(6.5
)%
 
76

The Palmer at Las Colinas
 
3,441

 
(0.2
)%
 
29

Windbrooke Crossing
 
4,478

 
3.4
 %
 
135

Woods of Burnsville
 
5,236

 
(7.0
)%
 
214

Properties acquired in 2017
 
4,340

 
N/A

 
N/A

 
 
$
24,312

 
 
 
 

Expenses:  Our operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were from the ongoing operations of our business and the ownership of 18 operating properties and increased as a result of the implementation of our investment strategy and the acquisition of two additional properties since December 31, 2016.
Management fees increased by $3.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily due to the increase in the asset management fee paid to the Advisor related to the ownership of two additional properties during the year ended December 31, 2017. The monthly asset management fee is equal to one-twelfth of 1.0% of the cost of each asset, without deduction for deprecation, bad debts or other non-cash reserves.     
General and administrative expenses decreased by $572,000 during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily as a result of a decrease in payroll allocated to us by the Advisor as well as a decrease in professional fees.
Loss on disposal of assets of $1.0 million related to the replacement of appliances at our rental properties in conjunction with unit upgrades.
Depreciation and amortization is comprised of the depreciation on our rental properties and amortization of intangible assets related to in-place leases which are amortized over a period of approximately six to nine months after acquisition. The increases (decreases) in the components of depreciation and amortization during the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, were as follows (in thousands):

43



 
Properties owned during both periods
 
All other properties
 
Total
Depreciation
$
11,543

 
$
1,659

 
$
13,202

Amortization of intangibles
(6,406
)
 
1,375

 
(5,031
)
 
$
5,137

 
$
3,034

 
$
8,171

The overall increase in depreciation expense for properties owned both periods is due to the additional $27.0 million in capital improvements made during 2017 in accordance with our planned renovations.
Interest expense increased by $8.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 as a result of four additional mortgages either entered into or assumed during the year ended December 31, 2017, which were used to finance property acquisitions, as well as amortization of deferred financing costs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
From February 2014 to February 2016, we offered in our public offering up to $1.0 billion in shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, at $10 per share. At the termination of the primary offering, we had raised $556.2 million in gross proceeds. We have also offered and continue to offer up to $95.0 million in shares of our common stock to be issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan under which our stockholders may elect to have distributions reinvested in additional shares at $8.63 per share ($8.65 per share prior to March 31, 2018).
We derive the capital required to purchase real estate investments and conduct our operations from the proceeds from our public offerings, secured or unsecured financings from banks or other lenders, from proceeds from the sale of assets and cash flow generated by our operations.
We allocate funds as necessary to a reserve to support the maintenance and viability of properties we acquire in the future in order to preserve value for our investors. If such allocations and any other available income become insufficient to cover our operating expenses and liabilities, it may be necessary to obtain additional funds by borrowing, refinancing properties or liquidating our investment in one or more properties, debt investments or other assets we may hold. We cannot assure you that we will be able to access additional funds when we need them or upon acceptable terms.
We may seek to obtain REIT-level financing through a line of credit from third-party financial institutions or other commercial lenders. Our assets will serve as collateral for this type of debt incurred to acquire real estate investments. In addition to debt financing at the REIT-level, we have financed, and may continue to finance, the acquisition costs of individual real estate investments, as well as the acquisition costs of all or a group of real estate investments acquired by us, by causing our subsidiaries to borrow directly from third-party financial institutions or other commercial lenders. Under these circumstances, our Advisor anticipates that certain properties will serve as collateral for the debt we incur to acquire those particular properties and that we will seek to obtain nonrecourse financing for the acquisition of the properties. However, there is no guarantee that our Advisor will be successful in obtaining financing arrangements on a property-by-property basis and that the loans would be nonrecourse to us. Finally, we may also obtain seller financing with respect to specific assets that we acquire.
Capital Expenditures
We deployed a total of $27.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 for capital expenditures. The properties in which we deployed the most capital during the year ended December 31, 2017 are listed separately and the capital expenditures made on all other properties are aggregated in "All other properties" below (in thousands):

44



 
 
Capital deployed
during the year ended
 
Remaining capital
budgeted

 
December 31, 2017
 
Overton Trails Apartment Homes
 
$
1,550

 
$
829

Uptown Buckhead
 
759

 
140

Crosstown at Chapel Hill
 
1,787

 
2,335

The Brookwood
 
1,732

 
4,263

1000 Spalding Crossing
 
1,682

 
1,019

Grand Reserve
 
1,810

 
2,085

Montclair
 
998

 
3,776

Verdant Apartment Homes
 
1,444

 
1,154

Arcadia Apartment Homes
 
1,764

 
1,871

Riverlodge
 
3,582

 
5,353

Breckenridge
 
2,984

 
4,827

Santa Rosa
 
4,211

 
6,048

All other properties
 
2,653

 
8,940

 
 
$
26,956

 
$
42,640

Common Stock
As of December 31, 2017, we had an aggregate of 60.8 million shares of $0.01 par value common stock outstanding, as follows (dollars in thousands):

 
Shares Issued
 
Gross Proceeds
Shares issued through initial public offering
 
55,791,297

 
$
556,197

Shares issued through stock distributions
 
246,365

 

Shares issued through distribution reinvestment plan
 
5,675,748

 
49,932

Advisor's initial investment, net of 5,000 share conversion
 
15,000

 
150

Shares redeemed and retired
 
(946,391
)
 
(8,235
)
Total shares outstanding
 
60,782,019

 
$
598,044


45



Debt
The following table presents a summary of our mortgage notes payable, net (in thousands):
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Collateral
 
Outstanding borrowings
 
Premium, net
 
Deferred Financing Costs, net
 
Carrying Value
 
Outstanding borrowings
 
Premium, net
 
Deferred Financing Costs, net
 
Carrying Value
Overton Trails Apartment Homes
 
$
30,485

 
$

 
$
(291
)
 
$
30,194

 
$
31,075

 
$

 
$
(344
)
 
$
30,731

Uptown Buckhead
 
20,039

 

 
(248
)
 
19,791

 
20,200

 

 
(284
)
 
19,916

Crosstown at Chapel Hill
 
31,826

 

 
(265
)
 
31,561

 
32,000

 

 
(373
)
 
31,627

The Brookwood - Key Bank
 
17,871

 
399

 
(188
)
 
18,082

 
18,247

 
508

 
(239
)
 
18,516

The Brookwood - Capital One
 
2,657

 
30

 
(32
)
 
2,655

 
2,699

 
39

 
(41
)
 
2,697

Adair off Addison and Adair off Addison Apartment Homes
 
25,091

 

 
(347
)
 
24,744

 
25,500

 

 
(464
)
 
25,036

1000 Spalding Crossing
 
24,600

 

 
(230
)
 
24,370

 
24,600

 

 
(289
)
 
24,311

Riverlodge
 
27,634

 

 
(315
)
 
27,319

 
28,292

 

 
(393
)
 
27,899

Verdant Apartment Homes
 
37,300

 

 
(289
)
 
37,011

 
37,300

 

 
(345
)
 
36,955

Arcadia Apartment Homes
 
40,200

 

 
(318
)
 
39,882

 
40,200

 

 
(379
)
 
39,821

Grand Reserve
 
41,520

 

 
(372
)
 
41,148

 
42,395

 

 
(446
)
 
41,949

Montclair Terrace
 
20,674

 

 
(290
)
 
20,384

 
21,083

 

 
(345
)
 
20,738

Breckenridge
 
52,975

 

 
(588
)
 
52,387

 
52,975

 

 
(697
)
 
52,278

The Palmer at Las Colinas
 
45,700

 

 
(574
)
 
45,126

 
45,700

 

 
(643
)
 
45,057

Windbrooke Crossing
 
38,320

 

 
(411
)
 
37,909

 
38,320

 

 
(490
)
 
37,830

Woods of Burnsville
 
38,250

 

 
(534
)
 
37,716

 

 

 

 

Indigo Creek
 
40,789

 

 
(471
)
 
40,318

 

 

 

 

Martin's Point
 
29,990

 

 
(423
)
 
29,567

 

 

 

 

 
 
$
565,921

 
$
429

 
$
(6,186
)
 
$
560,164

 
$
460,586

 
$
547

 
$
(5,772
)
 
$
455,361






    

46



The following table presents additional information about our mortgage notes payable, net, as of December 31, 2017 (in thousands, except percentages):
 
 
Maturity
Date
 
Margin over LIBOR
 
Annual Interest Rate
 
Average
Monthly Debt
Service
 
Average
Monthly Escrow
 
 
Overton Trails Apartment Homes
 
1/1/2025
 
1.91
%
 
3.47
%
 
$
137

 
$
117

 
(1) (3) (5)
Uptown Buckhead
 
7/1/2025
 
2.22
%
 
3.78
%
 
$
92

 
$
58

 
(1) (3) (5)
Crosstown at Chapel Hill
 
7/10/2020
 
1.70
%
 
3.26
%
 
$
121