PART I

 

Item 1.

Business

 

Overview

We are a clean technology company that provides state-of-the-art technologies for gas and liquid purification by manufacturing ceramic silicon carbide filters. For more than a decade, we have developed and manufactured products of re-crystallized silicon carbide. We specialize in two business areas: ceramic membranes for liquid filtration and diesel particulate filters (DPFs) for the control of soot exhaust particles from diesel engines. Using nanotechnology, we develop proprietary products using patented silicon carbide technology. Our products are based on unique silicon carbide membranes which facilitate new applications and improve existing technologies. We market our products from our offices in the United States and Denmark, and through local representatives. The products are shipped directly to customers from our production facilities in the United States and Denmark.

 

The terms “LiqTech”, “we”, “our”, “us”, the “Company” or any derivative thereof, as used herein refer to LiqTech International, Inc., a Nevada corporation, together with its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, including LiqTech USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“LiqTech USA”), which owns all of the outstanding equity interest in LiqTech International A/S, a Danish limited company, organized under the Danish Act on Limited Companies of the Kingdom of Denmark (“LiqTech Int. DK”), together with its direct wholly owned subsidiary LiqTech Systems A/S, a Danish limited company, organized under the Danish Act on Limited Companies of the Kingdom of Denmark (formerly known as Provital, “LiqTech Systems”) and LiqTech NA, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“LiqTech Delaware”). Collectively, LiqTech USA, LiqTech Int. DK, LiqTech Systems and LiqTech Delaware are referred to herein as our “Subsidiaries”.  

 

We conduct operations in the Kingdom of Denmark and the United States. Our Danish operations are located in the Copenhagen area and LiqTech Systems are located in Hobro in Jutland, Denmark, and our U.S. operations are conducted by LiqTech Delaware located in White Bear Lake, Minnesota.

 

Our Products

 

We manufacture and sell ceramic membranes and systems for the filtration of liquid and diesel particulate filters for the control of soot exhaust particles from diesel engines. 

   

Ceramic Silicon Carbide Membranes for Liquid Filtration

   

  Under the “LiqTech”, “Cometas” and “Provital” brand names, we manufacture and sell ceramic silicon carbide membranes and systems for liquid filtration using our patented silicon carbide technology (sometimes also referred to herein as our “SiC Filters”). Our currently focus is on marine scrubber bleed water, hydrocarbon production-derived contaminated water, which we refer to herein as “produced water”, removal of heavy metals in mining and energy applications, pre-filtration for reverse osmosis in drinking water and industrial applications. Our SiC Filters have been used in the following applications by our clients:

   

	●	Marine scrubber bleed water: From marine scrubber systems when reducing Sulphur emission from ships operating on heavy fuel oil (HFO). To date, fifteen water treatment systems have been ordered by three scrubber technology providers.
	●	Produced water: Our membranes can be used for the filtration of "produced" water – a byproduct from oil and gas production. The amount of produced water varies between 0.1 to ten times the amount of oil produced. We have performed testing with major international private and public oil and gas companies. We have been awarded a contract by an international oil and gas company to provide and service produced water filters on one of its offshore platforms. Two additional commercial installations have been commissioned with the LiqTech membranes.
	●	Pre-filtration of reverse osmosis drinking water: Prior to passing through reverse osmosis membranes to produce drinking or industrial water from sea or surface water, the sea or surface water must be pre-filtered. We have performed successful tests for the pre-filtration of sea and surface water for this purpose with numerous clients, including Synertech in Serbia, a supplier of drinking water, Arteron in Malaysia, a company producing compact drinking water solutions, and Hoimyung Corp in South Korea, a supplier of industrial waste water systems and pretreatment for reverse osmosis.
	●	Industrial applications: We have delivered complete water treatment systems for targeted applications, such as removal of a variety of substances such as heavy metals (energy providers in Denmark and Germany) and mining wastewater for a European mining company.

 

	●	Producing clean drinking water: The potential for the use of LiqTech SiC Filters in drinking water production is diverse and the benefits are numerous. Some examples include: ground water – removal of precipitated salts such as iron and manganese; surface water – removal of organic suspended solids and humic acid; and sea water – pre-filtration before reverse osmosis. We have entered into a cooperation agreement with a leading pump producer Grundfos to market a newly developed water treatment unit for ground water.
	●	Pool and spa water: We have supplied several medium to very large public pool installations in Europe.

 

 

Our products are based on the following silicon carbide membrane technologies:

 

	●	CoMem is a unique patented membrane technology that utilizes a cross-flow structure to handle high concentrations of suspended solids found in produced water from the oil and chemical industry, wastewater from industrial processes and manure filtration; and
	●	Aqua Solution integrates a dead-end structural design with cutting-edge membrane technology in a solution specifically designed for applications in pre-treatment for reverse osmosis, wastewater treatment and pool and spa filtration.

 

 Our SiC Filters are manufactured with a silicon carbide ceramic membrane based on a patented technology, and we are not aware of any other company that makes both the substrate (honeycomb) and the membrane (the part which accomplishes the filtering) solely from silicon carbide.

    

The advantages of our SiC Filters compared to other pre-filtration systems for reverse osmosis are:

 

	●	Our SiC Filters offer the same water flow as commonly used sand filters which take up to 400 times more space and have pore sizes at least three times bigger than our SiC Filters, and reduce the number of membrane elements and pressure vessels;
	●	With our SiC Filters, high flow capacities are achieved at very low pressures, which reduces energy costs;
	●	Our SiC Filters reduce water consumption for sand filter backwash; and
	●	Our SiC Filters eliminate consumption/maintenance of cartridges.

 

Our SiC Filters offer consistent removal of oil and suspended solids at high throughput rates regardless of feed conditions. The membranes are ideal for treatment of produced water for discharge, re-injection, pre-reverse osmosis ("RO") as well as polymer flooded streams. We offer on shore and off shore solutions and have extensive experience with produced water streams from fracking, gas condensate, and oil emulsions. We believe our SiC Filters are the best alternative to micro-flotation and walnut shell filters due to their cost savings, reduced installation cost and robustness with reduced downtime. Our chemically inert plug-and-play filter designs are extremely hard and durable materials with high flux (flow) to increase membrane life and reduce downtime for cleaning. SiC Filters are stronger, harder, longer lasting, more temperature resistant, and recover faster than conventional ceramic and polymeric membranes.

 

Our flat sheet membranes (“FSM”) offer low energy consumption, maximum permeation, innovative rack design, and high flux. These membranes are used in drinking water, pre-RO, and industrial wastewater reuse. The FSM carrier and the selective layer are also made of silicon carbide, which gives the product some unique advantages such as high flux, total chemical resistance (pH 0-14), long life, and the lowest fouling tendency of any polymeric and ceramic membrane material. Our tubular membranes offer robust and high yielding membrane solutions for produced water from the Oil & Gas market, and industrial wastewater to remove suspended solids as well as oil droplets and oil-emulsions from solutions. Our dynamic high flux membrane disks are designed for removal of high suspended solids. The filtration format is outside-in, with internal permeation channels that facilitate removal of the solids. The cross-flow effect is generated through the rotation of the discs at high velocities which enables flow cleaning of the filter membrane surface. This principle offers energy savings which can be above 80% compared to conventional cross flow.

 

The strategic acquisition of Provital in July 2014 (now LiqTech Systems) is consistent with our long-term growth strategy and strengthens our position in the integrated filtration technologies market. LiqTech Systems was one of the first in the world to develop filtration solutions based on ceramic membranes whose products result in more efficient, longer lasting systems that save water and demand less maintenance for large public pools and wastewater. The filtration systems are equipped with LiqTech Systems' own Intelligent Control System, which allows for local and/or remote control, monitoring and management of every aspect of the system. The system is easy to use and gives the user full control. The control system logs all necessary data and sends daily e-mails/SMS with all the information to a designated operator if required. We believe that LiqTech Systems solves many of the problems present in today's pool industry, including excess water consumption, energy, chemical usage, space and maintenance, and improves cost efficiency. The acquisition of LiqTech Systems has allowed LiqTech Systems to become a fully integrated, one-stop shop for plug and play filtration systems. We believe LiqTech will significantly accelerate the time to market for our SiC Filters and provide us with immediate credibility in the liquid filtration industry, particularly with our SiC Filters. By acquiring LiqTech Systems, we have gained validation in the industry by directly expanding our customer base to include existing reputable customers from LiqTech Systems.

 

 

We believe tightening government regulation and increasing industry awareness about the need for high quality injection water will contribute to the implementation of membrane technology, since conventional technologies will not be able to meet these demands. 

 

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we received grants from governmental entities of $462,451 and $157,804, respectively.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, our sales of liquid filters, services and systems were $3,987,424 and $7,731,079, respectively, and accounted for 35% and 56% of our total sales, respectively. 

 

Diesel Particulate Filters (DPFs)

 

We offer diesel particulate filters for exhaust emission control solutions to the verified retrofit and the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) market through our direct sales force. DPF sales are generally made to distributors specializing in sales to end users. We use a proprietary “nano washcoat” to provide catalytic coating for anything from diesel particulate filters to catalytic converters. We have developed a robust silicon carbide diesel particulate filter that is especially useful for vehicles that produce a high soot load, and, if properly maintained, should last as long as the vehicle’s engine. Our DPFs are ideal for off-road vehicles because of their strength, chemical non-reactive nature, temperature resilience and thermal conductivity. Our DPF products are sold worldwide under the LiqTech brand name. 

 

Our SiC Filters can handle higher soot loads than filters that do not use a silicon carbide membrane, which makes them ideal for situations in which engines infrequently reach high enough temperatures to burn off soot. Examples include:

 

	●	Garbage trucks;
	●	Port vehicles;
	●	Diesel pickup trucks not carrying a full load;
	●	Off-road construction vehicles that idle for long periods of time; and
	●	Intra-city vehicles that do not reach highway speeds.

  

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, our sales of DPFs were $7,230,416 and $5,820,793, respectively, and accounted for 64% and 42% of our total sales, respectively.

 

Kiln Furniture

 

Kiln furniture refers to all items used in a kiln to support ceramics that create additional space to maximize the number of items for each firing. Our high-quality SiC kiln furniture is thinner (allowing more items to be added for each firing), withstands higher heat, lasts longer and reduces the firing time (reducing energy costs) as compared to cordierite, mullite and oxide bonded kiln furniture.

 

Although we have produced kiln furniture as a means to maximize the efficiency of our manufacturing process and not as one of our primary products, we intend to phase out this commercial product over time.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, our kiln furniture revenues were $125,337 and $354,522, respectively, and accounted for 1% and 2% of our total sales, respectively.

 

Our Competitive Strengths

 

We believe the following strengths position us to increase our revenue and profitability:

 

●

Advantages of Silicon Carbide Membranes: Our diesel exhaust and liquid filtration products utilize silicon carbide membranes which have certain qualities that we believe make our products more desirable than those of our competitors. Unlike filtration products that use aluminum oxide, silicon carbide membranes are chemically inert and temperature resistant. Furthermore, silicon carbide membranes exhibit a high degree of hydrophilicity (tendency of a surface to become wet or to absorb water) which results in unique flux (low energy consumption). Silicon carbide is also highly durable, with hardness second to diamonds, making it conducive in a variety of industrial settings. As a result, we believe that such superior properties make our products desirable in both exhaust emissions control products and liquid filtration products.

 

 

●

Complete systems fabrication: LiqTech provides full fabrication and integration of our membranes into complete systems made from corrosive resistant materials and components. We strive to provide full in-house engineering capabilities in process design, 3D modelling and controls. The entire specification, engineering, fabrication and commission process is driven by our professional staff of highly dedicated engineers and craftsman. We believe that suppling our customers with turnkey solutions built around our silicon carbide membranes is unique in this market. LiqTech is more than a membrane supplier - we see ourselves as a full provider of complete water treatment systems.

  

●

Broad Application of LiqTech Membranes: Our membranes can and have been applied in a variety of applications, including the processing of industrial waste water, produced water and pretreatment of drinking water, prefilters for reverse osmosis, oil emulsion separation, bacteria removal for aquaculture, commercial pool treatment solutions and separating metals from liquids used in industrial processes.

 

	●	Marketing and Manufacturing in Key Markets and Expanding to Other Market: We have production and sales capacity in North America and Europe. We also sell our products through offices and agents in several key countries such as China, Spain, UK, Korea, France, Italy and Brazil, and we have established customer relations in more than 25 countries.
	●	Strong and Experienced Management Team: Our management team has significant experience in the clean technology and filtration industries, driving growth through development of new applications and technologies and cultivating relationships with customers.

 

Our Strategy 

 

Our strategy is to create stockholder value by leveraging our competitive strengths and focusing on the opportunities in the end-markets we serve. Key features of our strategy include:

 

	●	Continue to maintain and gain new Marine customers, i.e. scrubber technology providers and ship-owners/operators.
	●	Enter New Geographic Markets and Expand Existing Markets. We plan to continue to manufacture and sell our products out of Denmark and the United States. We intend to continue to develop our organization in Denmark and the United States. We intend to work with agents and partners to access appropriate markets.

 

●

Continue to Strengthen Position in DPF Market. We believe that we have a strong position in the retrofit market for diesel particulate filter (DPF) systems. We intend to continue our efforts to maintain our strength in this area. Furthermore, we intend to leverage our experience in the OEM market and expand our presence in the OEM market with new products relating to diesel particulate filter systems. Furthermore, LiqTech and Kailong have signed a Letter of Intent to establish a joint venture for production of SiC Filters in China.

 

●

Continue to Develop and Improve Technologies and Open New End Markets. We intend to continuously develop our ceramic membranes and improve the filtration efficiency for our filtration products. Through continuous development, we intend to find new uses for our products and plan to expand into any new markets that we believe would be appropriate for our Company. One of our key strategies is to develop our membrane applications together with our customers including, for example, the development of the next generation of diesel particulate filters with asymmetric design for the OEM market.

 

●

Continue Our Focus on Selling and on Development New Standard Units. We will continue our focus on selling systems based on our unique SIC Filters. We will also combine the ceramic membranes with other technologies to be able to offer our customers a complete solution. We will continue our focus to develop smaller standard systems, like our ground water treatment unit and our residential swimming pool units. These units will be sold through a network of agents and partnerships.

 

Our Industry 

 

Overview

 

We primarily serve two industries - the diesel particle filter (DPF) market and the liquid filtration system market. Our goal is to position ourselves to expand on and leverage our products and technology and to take advantage of the favorable industry trends that we anticipate.

 

 

Liquid Filtration Market

 

The market for marine installations is developing fast with new regulations for Sulphur and ballast water emissions. An estimated 8-10,000 ships will install a water treatment system over the coming five to seven years. (2018 Market Research Report on Global Marine Scrubber By Players, Type and Applications, Status and Forecast, 2012-2022).

 

The use of wet scrubbers to clean the exhaust from marine engines using high sulfur residual oil and diesel fuels may lead to discharge of high concentrations of a number of harmful compounds in the waters from vessels using such scrubbers. Several trials were conducted onboard vessels by scrubber suppliers to characterize the constituent concentrations in washwater discharge.

 

The trials found that Scrubber washwater also contains suspended solids, heavy metals, hydrocarbons and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Before the washwater is discharged, it must be treated to remove solids. LiqTech’s water treatment systems can be used to remove the solids from wet scrubber wash water. The treatment process includes a prefiltration step followed by a LiqTech SiC membrane filtration. Treated water quality is monitored (NTU, PAH and pH) before discharge.

 

The Company is globally engaging scrubber equipment suppliers, ship owner/operators and ship yards. Furthermore, we are presenting the water treatment solutions at marine conferences and trade shows.

 

In addition to our marine scrubbers, LiqTech offers packaged systems consisting of ceramic SiC and conventional RO membranes for industrial and municipal customers. We anticipate that global demand will increase for robust and OPEX attractive products such as ours that are well suited for mobile and modular systems. Reverse osmosis membranes are increasingly being used for the production of drinking water (desalination of sea water or brackish water), for demineralized water in industrial processes (boiler feed water, microelectronics production), as well as in food processing and pharmaceutical production (Lux Research). In addition, many laboratories rely on pure water, for which demineralization is an essential step. LiqTech is differentiated by what we believe is superior SiC membrane technology and by being able to produce more of the water treatment package in-house. According to an industry report (Lux Research), the aggregate water volume treated by membranes is expected to grow from 29 billion cubic meters in 2009 to 82 billion cubic meters in 2020.

 

We also see a general trend worldwide for increasing demand for higher quality re-injection water in connection with unconventional oil and gas production. In addition, we see tightening discharge legislations, increasing water cuts (more water produced per barrel oil) and the introduction of Enhanced Oil Recovery (“EOR”) techniques. The tightening of produced water specifications is a problem for conventional technologies. However, our SiC Filters have been shown to mitigate these challenges and we believe the increasing demand represents a favorable market trends for our business.

 

Water is essential to life on earth, and clean water shortages are expected to affect two-thirds of the human population by 2025 (Worldwildlife). One-third of the human population is living today with clean water shortcomings, and this is expected to increase to two-thirds of the population by 2025 due to the growing population (United Nations). According to the World Health Organization, approximately 1.6 million children die every year due to unsafe water and the lack of basic sanitation. Due to the growing need for pure water for drinking and industrial purposes, the market for membrane filtration is growing rapidly, with more and larger plants being commissioned all over the world.

 

Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) Market

 

The increase in global regulation of diesel particles is expected to drive growth in the DPF market. We expect jurisdictions in the United States to begin requiring DPF filters. In Europe, cities in Germany are setting requirements for off-road machinery requirements for DPF filters. According to an industry publication, the global market for new DPF filters manufactured by OEMs is expected to increase from approximately 1.7 million units in 2010 to over 9 million units in 2020. Diesel emissions consist of several toxic gasses and particles: particulate matter (soot), carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons. Soot has been linked to a variety of health problems in humans. Abt Associates, for the Clean Air Task Force, estimates that approximately 21,000 people in the U.S. die prematurely each year from breathing diesel soot, 3,000 of those from lung cancer. Another 27,000 heart attacks, 14,500 hospitalizations and 2.4 million lost work days a year are attributable to diesel particulate matter exposures. In 2010, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) estimated that diesel transport represented 50% of the total ambient air pollution in OECD countries, which equates to over $785 billion in health damages. The Abt Associates report, using EPA science advisory board methodology, estimated that the monetary value of the health damages from diesel-related particulate matter in the U.S. was approximately $139 billion (in 1999 dollars). Reducing diesel emissions will have both health benefits and social benefits to society, along with reduced costs.

 

  In response to these health impacts, governments have been implementing legislation to regulate emissions from diesel engines. California implemented the Diesel Risk Reduction Plan, which required the curtailment of diesel particle emissions by 25% by 2010 and a further 15% by 2020. New York City has implemented binding directives for the retrofitting of buses, garbage trucks and construction machines. In the European Union, Directive EC 715/2007 of June 20, 2007 defined particle count limits for certain cars and light utility vehicles. Also, in Europe, low emission zones have been implemented locally, creating a patchwork of regulation. The increase in global regulation of diesel particles is expected to drive growth in the DPF market. According to an industry publication, the global market for new DPF filters manufactured by OEMs is expected to increase from approximately 1.7 million units in 2010 to over 9 million units in 2020. 

 

The Asian markets have shown economic growth and an improved standard of living which has led to increased sales of vehicles in the Asia-Oceania region. At the same time, the pollution in major cities has reached high PM levels. As a result, we believe that the Chinese government could introduce additional regulations, including new emissions standards faster than previously anticipated. We also believe the high pollution levels will result in an increase in the need for retrofitting existing vehicles.

 

 

Manufacturing

 

We currently manufacture our products in facilities located in Ballerup, Denmark and White Bear Lake, Minnesota, and assemble our systems in LiqTech Systems, located in Hobro in Jutland, Denmark. We have plans to expand our production capacity in both Denmark and Minnesota, primarily through additional investment in equipment relating to our liquid filtration products, if this becomes necessary.

 

Raw Materials

 

The main raw materials that we use in our manufacturing processes are silicon carbide, steel, plastic, platinum and palladium. We purchase these commodities from various sources generally based upon availability and price. There is a limited supply of silicon carbide available to us. As other industries develop products utilizing silicon carbide, we may not be able to obtain adequate supplies of silicon carbide required for the manufacture of our existing and planned future water filtration products. Any increased demand for silicon carbide, platinum or palladium could increase the price we must pay to obtain it and could adversely affect our profitability. However, our management believes that we could obtain satisfactory substitutes for these materials should they become unavailable.

 

Sales, Marketing and Distribution 

 

Our products are sold primarily to large industrial customers that use our products for gas and liquid filtration. Since the start of the Company the automotive industry has been a focus for us and our single largest market. In 2014, we acquired LiqTech Systems (formerly known as Provital), a Danish systems manufacturing company, which has strengthened our focus on the liquid filtration business. This business is now our largest products group focusing on applications within the pool, drinking water, water reclamation, oil and gas, heavy metal removal and aquaculture markets.

 

 For the year ended December 31, 2017, our four largest customers accounted for approximately 16%, 10%, 7% and 5%, respectively, of our net sales (approximately 38% in total). For the year ended December 31, 2016, our four largest customers accounted for approximately 33%, 25%, 5% and 4%, respectively, of our net sales (approximately 67% in total). If we are unable to diversify our customer base, our future results will be heavily dependent on these customers. 

 

   We plan to actively market our existing products to new customers as we increase our production capacity. As of March 23, 2018, we had seven (7) full time salesmen or distribution agents. We promote our products through direct contact to potential customers and by meeting potential customers in trade fairs and exhibitions.

 

In certain instances, our products are delivered to the end customer through systems integrators. These systems integrators use our filtration products in larger filtration systems, which eventually are installed in products used by the end customer. Due to the regulation surrounding the reasons why many of the end customers use filtration systems, the systems integrators often are required by such end customers to receive approval of their systems, including the components used in such systems, which requires the use of significant time and money. As a result, we believe that certain of the systems integrators that use our products will not replace our filters with competitive products unless there is good reason.

 

Intellectual Property

 

As of March 23, 2018, we had one issued United States patent that we co-own with a third party, two issued Danish patents, three issued foreign patents (in Germany, China and South Korea) that we co-own with a third party and one pending European patent application which we co-own with a third party. The United States patent that we co-own is generally effective for 20 years from the filing date of the earliest U.S. or international application to which it claims priority. The scope and duration of each of our foreign patents varies in accordance with local law. On July 7, 2014, we obtained a new Danish patent application related to the silicon carbide membrane technology in Denmark.

 

We also rely on trade secret protection for our confidential and proprietary information. Trade secrets, however, can be difficult to protect. We may not be able to maintain our technology or know-how as trade secrets, and competitors may develop or acquire equally valuable or more valuable technology or know-how related to the manufacture of comparable silicon carbide products. We also seek to protect our confidential and proprietary information, in part, by requiring all employees, consultants and business partners to execute confidentiality and/or nondisclosure agreements upon the commencement of any employment, consulting arrangement or engagement with us. These agreements generally require that all confidential and proprietary information developed by the employee, consultant or business partner, or made known to the employee, consultant or business partner by us, during the course of the relationship with us, be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties.

  

We also believe that having distinctive names may be an important factor in marketing our products, and therefore use trademarks to brand some of our products. As of March 23, 2018, we had one trademark registration in the United States (LiqTech NA) and four trademark registrations in the European Union (AQUA SOLUTION, CoMem, CDPX and FUTURE FILTRATION).

 

 

Government Regulation

 

We do not believe that we are subject to any special governmental regulations affecting our products in the countries in which we have operations, except that in Minnesota, we are required to comply with the Minnesota Air Pollution standards related to the use of our incinerators located in our Minnesota facilities. We are subject to numerous health and safety laws and regulations. In the United States, these laws and regulations include the Federal Occupation Safety and Health Act and comparable state legislation. We are also subject to similar requirements in other countries in which we have extensive operations, including Denmark, where we are subject to various regulations. We actively seek to maintain a safe, healthy and environmentally friendly workplace for all of our employees and those who work with us.

 

Environmental Matters

 

We are subject to a broad range of federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations which govern, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges and the handling, storage, disposal and release of waste and hazardous substances. It is our policy to comply with applicable environmental requirements at all of our facilities. We are also subject to laws such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, that may impose liability retroactively and without fault for releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances at on-site or off-site locations. We are subject to similar requirements in Denmark and other European countries. From time to time, we have identified environmental compliance issues at our facilities. To date, compliance with environmental matters has not had a material effect upon the Company’s capital expenditures or competitive position.

 

We believe that, due to the constant focus on the environment and clean air and clean water standards throughout the world, a requirement in the future to adhere to new and more stringent regulations both in the U.S. and abroad is possible as governmental agencies seek to improve standards required for certification of products intended to promote clean air and water. In the event our products fail to meet these ever-changing standards, some or all of our products may become obsolete, which could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and long-term prospects.

 

Research and Development

 

As of March 23, 2018, we had nine (9) full-time employees spending a majority of their working hours on research and development. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we spent $536,848 and $626,147, respectively, on Company-sponsored research and development.

  

Competition 

 

Our products compete with other filters that are made using both ceramic and plastic membranes. Most of our competitors are large industrial companies. However, we believe our patented technology allows us to produce high quality, low cost products that give us an advantage over many of our competitors, many of which have greater financial, technological, manufacturing and personnel resources. We intend to continue to devote resources to improving our products in order to maintain our existing customers and to add new customers.

 

Employees

 

As of March 23, 2018, we had 64 employees, 62 of whom were full-time employees. We had 55 employees at our operations in Denmark, including 9 in research and development, 7 in sales and engineering and 2 in executive management. We also had 9 employees in the United States sales, accounting and production.

 

Certain labor employees in Denmark are represented by workers’ councils that have collective bargaining agreements. With the exception of said Denmark employees, no other employees are members of a labor union or are represented by workers’ councils that have collective bargaining agreements. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.

 

Corporate Information

 

We filed our Articles of Incorporation on July 1, 2004 and are incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada. Our principal executive offices are located at Industriparken 22C, 2750 Ballerup, Denmark, and our telephone number is +4544986000. We maintain an Internet website at www.liqtech.com. The information contained in, or accessible from, our website is not a part of this report. 

 

 

Item 1A.   Risk Factors

 

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS 

 

We may be unable to continue as a going concern based on our historical performance, which has included net losses and an accumulated deficit. We may continue to generate losses and be required to reduce or curtail our operations.

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has limited cash and incurred significant recent losses. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 2.  

 

We have historically incurred operating losses and may continue to do so in the future. There can be no assurance that our efforts to execute our business plan will be successful. We must develop new customer relationships and substantially increase our revenues. Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $4,460,352 and our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $16,418,634. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we have an accumulated deficit of $28,471,696 and $24,011,343, respectively.  

 

We will need additional funds to sustain our business. Financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all, and our failure to raise capital when needed could materially adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. Additional equity financing may be dilutive to holders of our common stock, and debt financing, if available, may involve significant cash payment obligations and covenants that restrict our ability to operate our business. In the event that the Company is unable to raise funds, there is substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern, and the Company may be required to reduce or curtail its operations.

 

Historically, we have been dependent on a few major customers for a significant portion of our Company's revenue. Our revenue could decline if we are unable to maintain or develop relationships with additional customers and our results of operations could be adversely affected if any one of these customers is unable to meet their financial obligations to us.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2017, our four largest customers accounted for approximately 16%, 10%, 7% and 5%, respectively, of our net sales (approximately 38% in total). During the year ended December 31, 2016, we had four customers who accounted for approximately 33%, 25%, 5% and 4%, respectively, of our net sales (approximately 67% in total). If we are unable to diversify our customer base, our future results will be heavily dependent on these customers. Our dependence on a limited number of customers means that the loss of a major customer or any reduction in orders by a major customer would materially reduce our net sales and adversely affect our results of operations. We expect that sales to relatively few customers will continue to account for a significant percentage of our net sales for the foreseeable future. However, these customers or our other customers may not use our products at current levels in the future, if at all. We have no firm, long-term volume commitments from any of our major customers and we generally enter into individual purchase orders with our customers, in certain cases under master agreements that govern the terms and conditions of the relationship. We have experienced cancellations of orders and fluctuations in order levels from period-to-period and expect that we will continue to experience such cancellations and fluctuations in the future. Customer purchase orders may be cancelled, and order volume levels can be changed, cancelled or delayed with limited or no penalties. We may not be able to replace cancelled, delayed or reduced purchase orders with new orders. If any one of these customers reduces their demand for our products, it will likely have a material adverse effect on our operations.

  

Furthermore, a significant portion of our accounts receivable is concentrated with these four major customers, some of whom have limited working capital resources who may not be able to meet their financial obligations to us. The failure of any such customers to pay amounts owed to us in a timely fashion or at all could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. The Company is also exposed to credit risk on its accounts receivable, and this risk is heightened during periods when economic conditions worsen. The Company's outstanding receivables are not covered by collateral or credit insurance. The Company's exposure to credit and collectability risk on its receivables may also be higher in certain international markets and its ability to mitigate such risks may be limited. While the Company has procedures to monitor and limit exposure to credit risk on its receivables as well as long-term prepayments, there can be no assurance such procedures will effectively limit its credit risk and avoid losses.

 

Our success will depend, to a large degree, on the expertise and experience of the members of our management team, the loss of whom could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Our success is, to a large degree, dependent upon the expertise and experience of the management team and its ability to attract and retain quality personnel. The loss of the services of one or more of such personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business. Our business may be adversely affected if we are unable to continue to attract and retain such personnel.

  

 

We will need to add qualified additional personnel as we expand our business, and we may not be able to employ such persons, which could affect our ability to expand and have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

In order to expand our product offerings and customer base, we will need to hire additional qualified personnel. We may not be able to locate such persons, and even if we locate them, we may not have the funds to employ them, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Future growth of our business depends in part, on the general availability of funding for emissions control programs, as well as enforcement of existing emissions-related environmental regulations and further tightening of emission standards worldwide, both of which are beyond our control and the lack of which could negatively affect our future growth.

 

Future growth of our business depends in part on the general availability of funding for emissions control programs, which can be affected by economic as well as political reasons which are beyond our control. For example, in light of the budget crisis in California, funding was not available for a state-funded emissions control project and its start date was pushed back. Funding for these types of emissions control projects drives the demand for our diesel particulate filters. If such funding is not available, it can negatively affect our future growth prospects. In addition to funding, we also expect that our future business growth will be driven, in part, by the enforcement of existing emissions-related environmental regulations and tightening of emissions standards worldwide, which regulations and standards are frequently contested in litigation. For example, the Alliance for California Business filed suit against the California Air Resources Board in an effort to cease the California Air Resources Board’s mandate that a DPF be retrofitted on certain older diesel trucks. If existing regulations and emissions standards do not continue to become stricter, are loosened or are not enforced by governmental authorities due to commercial and business pressure or otherwise, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and long-term prospects.

  

If we are unable to manage our expected growth, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

 

We expect to expand, our operations. The growth of our business could place significant strain on our management and operational and financial resources. To manage our future growth, we could be required to improve existing or implement new operational or financial systems, procedures and controls or expand, train and manage a growing employee base. Our failure to accomplish any of these tasks could materially and adversely affect our business.

  

We face constant changes in governmental standards by which our products are evaluated, and if we cannot meet any such changes, some of our products could become obsolete, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

We believe that, due to the constant focus on the environment and clean air and clean water standards throughout the world, a requirement in the future to adhere to new and more stringent regulations both in the U.S. and abroad is possible as governmental agencies seek to improve standards required for certification of products intended to promote clean air and water. In the event our products fail to meet these ever-changing standards, some or all of our products may become obsolete, which could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and long-term prospects.

 

Our inability to protect our intellectual property rights could negatively affect our business and results of operations.

 

Our ability to compete effectively depends in part upon developing, maintaining and/or protecting intellectual property rights relevant to our re-crystallized silicon carbide product forms, applications and manufacturing processes. We rely principally on a combination of patent protection, trade secret laws, confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements and trusted business relationships to establish, maintain and protect the intellectual property rights relevant to our business. These measures, however, may not be adequate in every given case to permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage, particularly in those countries where the laws do not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. In particular, because silicon carbide is a well-known material (developed over 100 years ago), and there has been extensive research, development and publication related to this material and its wide range of applications, obtaining intellectual property rights to key elements of silicon carbide technology can be challenging. Accordingly, at least some of the technology employed in our manufacture of re-crystallized silicon carbide products is not protected by patents.

 

Where we consider it appropriate, we seek patent protection in the United States and other countries on technologies used in, or relating to, our re-crystallized silicon carbide product forms, applications and manufacturing processes. The issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its scope, validity and enforceability. Thus, any patent or patent application which may issue into a patent held by us could be challenged, invalidated or held unenforceable in litigation or proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and/or other patent tribunals, or circumvented by others. No consistent policy regarding the breadth of patent claims has emerged to date in the United States and the landscape could become more uncertain in view of future rule changes by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the introduction of patent reform legislation and decisions in patent law cases by United States federal courts. The patent landscape outside the United States is even less predictable. As a result, the validity and enforceability of patents cannot be predicted with certainty. In addition, we may fail to apply for patents on important technologies or product candidates in a timely fashion, if at all, and our existing and future patents may not be sufficiently broad to prevent others from practicing our technologies or from developing competing products or technologies, especially given the long history of silicon carbide development. 

 

 

Our patent strategy is generally uncertain and involves complex legal and factual questions. Our ability to maintain and solidify our proprietary technology may depend in part upon our success in obtaining patent rights and enforcing those rights once granted or licensed. We do not know whether any of our pending patent applications will result in the issuance of any patents. Our issued patents and those that may be issued in the future may be challenged, invalidated, rendered unenforceable or circumvented, which could limit our ability to prevent competitors from marketing similar or related products, or shorten the term of patent protection that we may have for our products, processes and enabling technologies. In addition, the rights granted under any issued patents may not provide us with competitive advantages against competitors with similar technology. Furthermore, our competitors may independently develop similar technologies, duplicate technology developed by us or otherwise possess intellectual property rights that could limit our ability to manufacture our products and operate our business. 

 

We also rely on trade secret protection for our confidential and proprietary information. Trade secrets, however, can be difficult to protect. We may not be able to maintain our technology or know-how as trade secrets, and competitors may develop or acquire equally valuable or more valuable technology or know-how related to the manufacture of comparable silicon carbide products. We also seek to protect our confidential and proprietary information, in part, by requiring all employees, consultants and business partners to execute confidentiality and/or nondisclosure agreements upon the commencement of any employment, consulting arrangement or engagement with us. These agreements generally require that all confidential and proprietary information developed by the employee, consultant or business partner, or made known to the employee, consultant or business partner by us, during the course of the relationship with us, be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties. These agreements may be breached and may not provide adequate remedies in the event of breach. To the extent that our employees, consultants or business partners use intellectual property owned by others in their work for and/or with us, disputes could arise as to the rights in related or resulting technologies, know-how or inventions. Moreover, while we also require customers and vendors to execute agreements containing confidentiality and/or nondisclosure provisions, we may not have obtained such agreements from all of our customers and vendors. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors, customers or vendors. Such customers or vendors may also be subject to laws and regulations that require them to disclose information that we would otherwise seek to keep confidential.

  

Moreover, others may independently develop and obtain patents covering technologies that are similar or superior to the product forms, applications or manufacturing processes that we employ. If that happens, we may need to obtain licenses for these technologies and may not be able to obtain licenses on reasonable terms, if at all, which could limit our ability to manufacture our future products and operate our business. In addition, third parties could practice our intellectual property rights in territories where we do not have intellectual property protection. Such third parties may then try to import products made using our intellectual property rights into the United States or other countries, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

  

Our contracts with third parties could negatively affect our intellectual property rights.

 

To further our product development efforts, we continue to work closely with customers, the Danish government and other third parties to research and develop advancements in silicon carbide product forms, applications, manufacturing processes and related products and technologies. We have entered into agreements with private third parties and have been awarded a research and development contract with the Danish government to independently and jointly research, design and develop new devices and systems that incorporate our silicon carbide technologies. We expect to enter into similar private agreements and be awarded similar government contracts in the future. In some instances, the research and development activities that we conduct under these contracts may produce intellectual property to which we may not have ownership or exclusive rights and will be unable to protect or monetize. Furthermore, there could be disputes between us and a private third party as to the ownership rights to any inventions that we develop in collaboration with such third party. Any such dispute may cause us to incur substantial costs and could place a significant strain on our financial resources, divert the attention of management from our core business or harm our reputation. 

 

We could become subject to intellectual property litigation that could be costly, limit or cancel our intellectual property rights, divert time and efforts away from business operations, require us to pay damages and/or otherwise have an adverse material impact on our business.

 

The success of our business is highly dependent on protecting our intellectual property rights. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products and/or enabling technology. Policing the unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights is difficult and expensive, as is enforcing these rights against unauthorized use by others. Identifying unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights is difficult because we may be unable to monitor the processes and/or materials being employed by other parties. The steps we have taken may not prevent unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights, particularly in foreign countries where enforcement of intellectual property rights may be more difficult than in the United States.

 

 

Our continued commercial success will also depend in part upon not infringing the patents or violating the intellectual property rights of third parties. We are aware of patents and patent applications generally relating to aspects of our technologies filed by, and issued to, third parties. Nevertheless, we cannot determine with certainty whether such patents or patent applications of other parties may materially affect our ability to conduct our business. There may be existing patents of which we are unaware that we may inadvertently infringe, resulting in claims against us or our customers. In the event that the manufacture, use and/or sale of our products or processes is challenged, or if our product forms or processes conflict with the patent rights of others, third parties could bring legal actions against us in the United States, Europe or other countries, claiming damages and seeking to enjoin the manufacturing and/or marketing of our products. Additionally, it is not possible to predict with certainty what patent claims may issue from any relevant third-party pending patent applications. Third parties may be able to obtain patents with claims relating to our product forms, applications and/or manufacturing processes which they could attempt to assert against us.

 

In either case, litigation may be necessary to enforce, protect or defend our intellectual property rights or to determine the validity and scope of the intellectual property rights of others. Any litigation could be unsuccessful, cause us to incur substantial costs, divert resources and the efforts of our personnel away from daily operations, harm our reputation and/or result in the impairment of our intellectual property rights. In some cases, litigation may be threatened or brought by a patent holding company or other adverse patent owner who has no relevant product revenues and against which our patents may provide little or no deterrence. If we are found to infringe any patents, we could be required to (1) pay substantial monetary damages, including lost profits, reasonable royalties and/or treble damages if an infringement is found to be willful and/or (2) totally discontinue or substantially modify any products or processes that are found to be in violation of another party’s intellectual property rights. If our competitors are able to use our technology without payment to us, our ability to compete effectively could be harmed.

  

We face competition and technological advances by competitors, which could adversely affect the sales of our products.

 

The growth of our Company depends in part on maintaining and growing the sales of our current products in our markets, but also in developing new products and technologies. There is significant competition among companies that provide solutions for pollutant emissions from diesel engines and water purification solutions. Several companies market products that compete directly with our products. Other companies offer products that potential customers may consider to be acceptable alternatives to our products and services, including products that are verified by the Environmental Protection Agency or other environmental authorities. We face direct competition from companies with greater financial, technological, manufacturing and personnel resources. Newly developed products could be more effective and cost efficient than our current or future products.

 

Failure to obtain adequate supplies of raw materials or failure to obtain raw materials at affordable prices could negatively affect our ability to supply products to our customers and negatively affect our profit margins.

 

We use silicon carbide, steel, plastic, platinum and palladium in the manufacture of our products. As other industries develop products utilizing silicon carbide, we may not be able to obtain adequate supplies of silicon carbide required for the manufacture of our existing and planned future water filtration products which would prevent us from supplying products to our customers and materially affect our business. Furthermore, any increased demand for, the raising of tariff rates on, or an increase of non-tariff trade barriers that apply to silicon carbide, steel, plastic, platinum or palladium could increase the price we must pay to obtain it and could adversely affect our profitability, which would have an adverse effect on our financial results.

 

We may rely on sub-contractors to meet current demand for our products and we may need to obtain additional manufacturing capacity in order to increase production of our existing products or to produce our proposed new products, the failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our operations.

 

We may not have sufficient internal manufacturing capacity to meet the current demand for our products, and we may need to rely on subcontractors to enable us to meet this demand. Since we may rely on our subcontractors for a significant amount of our production capacity, the loss of the services of our subcontractors would have a material adverse effect on our business. Our plans for the growth of our business rely upon increasing sales of our existing products and systems and developing and marketing new products. We do not have adequate internal manufacturing facilities to substantially increase production of our products and obtaining additional manufacturing capacity in-house will require substantial capital expenditures. We may not be able to locate such additional facilities, and, if located, we may not have the capital resources to obtain or construct them, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations.

 

Our results may fluctuate due to certain regulatory, marketing and competitive factors over which we have little or no control.

 

The factors listed below, some of which we cannot control, may cause our revenue and results of operations to fluctuate significantly:

 

●

Actions taken by regulatory bodies relating to the verification, registration or health effects of our products;

 

●

The extent to which existing and newly developed products obtain market acceptance;

 

●

The timing and size of customer purchases;

 

 

●

Customer concerns about the stability of our business, which could cause them to seek alternatives to our solutions and products; and

 

●

Increases in raw material costs.

 

Any significant fluctuations in our revenue or results of operations could negatively impact investor confidence and shares of our common stock may trade at prices significantly below the price you paid to acquire them. Furthermore, declines in the price of our common stock may adversely affect our ability to conduct future offerings or to recruit and retain key employees, including our managing directors and other key professional employees.

  

Foreign currency fluctuations could adversely impact financial performance.

 

Our reporting currency is the United States Dollar ($). Because of our activities in Denmark, the European Continent and other countries, we are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency rates. We may manage the risk to such exposure by entering into foreign currency futures and option contracts; however we can make no assurance that such actions will be sufficient to offset a material adverse effect on our operations in the future. 

 

We may be adversely affected by global and regional economic conditions and legislative, regulatory and political developments.

 

We sell our products around the world, and we expect to continue to derive a substantial portion of sales from outside the U.S. The uncertain macroeconomic environment in the U.S. and other countries around the globe from which we derive significant sales may adversely affect our results and could have a negative impact on demand for our products. Customers or suppliers may experience cash flow problems and as a result, may modify, delay or cancel plans to purchase our products, and suppliers may significantly and quickly increase their prices or reduce their output. Additionally, if customers are not successful in generating sufficient revenue or are precluded from securing financing, they may not be able to pay, or may delay payment of, amounts owed to us. Any inability of current and/or potential customers to purchase our products and/or to pay us for our products may adversely affect our sales, earnings and cash flow. Sales and earnings could also be affected by our ability to manage the risks and uncertainties associated with the application of local legal requirements or the enforceability of laws and contractual obligations, trade protection measures, changes in tax laws, regional political instability, war, terrorist activities, severe or prolonged adverse weather conditions and natural disasters as well as health epidemics or pandemics.

 

Any liability for environmental harm or damages resulting from technical faults or failures of our products could be substantial and could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.

 

Customers rely upon our products to meet emissions control standards imposed upon them by the government. Failure of our products to meet such standards could expose us to claims from customers. Our products are also integrated into goods used by consumers, and therefore a malfunction or the inadequate design of our products could result in product liability claims. Any liability for environmental harm or damages resulting from technical faults or failures could be substantial and could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, a well-publicized actual or perceived problem could adversely affect the market’s perception of our products, which would materially impact our financial condition and operating results.

 

We could become liable for damages resulting from our manufacturing activities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business or cause us to cease operations.

 

The nature of our manufacturing operations exposes us to potential claims and liability for environmental damage, personal injury, loss of life and damage to, or destruction of, property. Our manufacturing operations are subject to numerous laws and regulations that govern environmental protection and human health and safety. These laws and regulations have changed frequently in the past and it is reasonable to expect additional and more stringent changes in the future. Our manufacturing operations may not comply with future laws and regulations, and we may be required to make significant unanticipated capital and operating expenditures to bring our operations within compliance with such regulations. If we fail to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations, manufacturing guidelines, and workplace safety requirements, governmental authorities may seek to impose fines and penalties on us or to revoke or deny the issuance or renewal of operating permits, and private parties may seek damages from us. Under such circumstances, we could be required to curtail or cease operations, conduct site remediation or other corrective action, or pay substantial damage claims for which may not have sufficient or any insurance coverage for claims.

  

 

A significant portion of our assets and the majority of our officers and directors are located outside of the United States, and therefore it may be difficult for an investor to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against us or such officers and directors.

 

A significant portion of our assets are located outside of the United States. In addition, the majority of our officers and directors are nationals and/or residents of countries other than the United States, and all or a substantial portion of such persons’ assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for an investor to affect service of process or enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against us or such officers or directors, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof. In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of other jurisdictions would recognize or enforce judgments of United States courts obtained against us or our directors and officers predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof, or be competent to hear original actions brought in other jurisdictions against us, or such officers and directors predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof. 

 

We will continue to incur significant costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management may be required to devote substantial time to compliance initiatives which ultimately could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.   

 

As a public company, we expect to continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, have imposed various requirements on public companies, including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls as well as mandating certain corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will continue to devote a substantial amount of time and financial resources to these compliance initiatives.

 

Effective January 1, 2018, we are no longer an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act of 2012, and as such we may no longer take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies, such as exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. This increased burden will further increase our compliance burden.

 

As a “smaller reporting company” we are still able to take advantage of certain exceptions available to both emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and the exemption from providing a “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section in our proxy statements; providing only 3 years of business development information; and other “scaled” disclosure requirements that are less comprehensive than issuers that are not smaller reporting companies. If in the future, we are no longer remain a smaller reporting company we will not be able to take advantage of such exemptions as an emerging growth company.

 

 We previously elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards under Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act, which allowed us to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. We are no longer entitled to this extended transition period, and as a result we may incur additional expenses and our management and other personnel may have to devote additional resources to compliance with such new or revised standards.

 

If we fail to staff our accounting and finance function adequately, or maintain internal control systems adequate to meet the demands that are placed upon us as a public company, we may be unable to report our financial results accurately or in a timely manner and our business and stock price may suffer. The costs of being a public company, as well as diversion of management’s time and attention, may have a material adverse effect on our future business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our acquisition of LiqTech Systems included the acquisition of goodwill, which is subject to a periodic impairment analysis, and a significant impairment determination in any future period could have an adverse effect on our results of operations even without a significant loss of revenue or increase in cash expenses attributable to such period.

 

Our acquisition of LiqTech Systems included approximately $9.4 million of goodwill. We are required to evaluate this goodwill for impairment based on the fair value of LiqTech Systems at least once a year. This estimated fair value could change if LiqTech Systems is unable to achieve operating results at the levels that have been forecasted, the market valuation of LiqTech Systems decreases based on transactions involving similar companies, or there is a permanent, negative change in the market demand for the services offered by LiqTech Systems. These changes could result in an impairment of the existing goodwill balance that could require a material non-cash charge to our results of operations. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $0 and $7,343,208 on goodwill, during the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 respectively, as management estimated fair value of the reporting unit did not exceeded the carrying value during 2016 fourth quarter testing.

 

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, and current and potential stockholders may lose confidence in our financial reporting.

 

We are required by the SEC to establish and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting that provides reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. We are likewise required, on a quarterly basis, to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and to disclose any changes and material weaknesses in those internal controls. In Item 9A, we disclose that with respect to the standards of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404, the internal controls-standard to which we were subjected to, we reported material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting. For additional information on this item, please see Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

 

 

Although we believe our historical efforts have strengthened our internal control over financial reporting (and we concluded that our financial statements were reliable, notwithstanding the material weakness we reported), we cannot be certain that our revised internal control practices will ensure that we will have or maintain adequate internal control over our financial reporting in future periods. Any failure to have or maintain such internal controls could adversely impact our ability to report our financial results accurately and on a timely basis. If our financial statements are not accurate, investors may not have a complete understanding of our operations.

  

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

 

Future equity financings or convertible debt would dilute your ownership and could adversely affect your common stock ownership rights in comparison with those of other security holders.

 

Our board of directors has the power to issue additional shares of common or preferred stock without stockholder approval. In general, stockholders do not have preemptive rights to any common stock issued by us in the future. Therefore, stockholders may experience additional dilution of their equity investment if we issue additional shares of common stock in the future, including shares issuable under equity incentive plans, or if we issue securities that are convertible into shares of our common stock. 

 

If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage of ownership of our existing stockholders will be reduced, and such newly issued securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing stockholders. If we issue additional common stock or securities convertible into common stock, such issuance will reduce the proportionate ownership and voting power of each other stockholder. In addition, such stock issuances might result in a reduction of the book value of our common stock, which could make our stock unattractive to existing stockholders.

   

Provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws could discourage a change in control, or an acquisition of us by a third party, even if the acquisition would be favorable to you, thereby adversely affecting existing stockholders.

 

Our articles of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may have the effect of making more difficult or delaying attempts by others to obtain control of our Company, even when these attempts may be in the best interests of stockholders. For example, our articles of incorporation authorize our Board of Directors, without stockholder approval, to issue one or more series of preferred stock, which could have voting and conversion rights that adversely affect or dilute the voting power of the holders of common stock. These provisions and others that could be adopted in the future could deter unsolicited takeovers or delay or prevent changes in our control or management, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices. These provisions may also limit the ability of stockholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interests.

 

There is limited trading volume of our common stock, which could make it difficult for you to liquidate an investment in our common stock in a timely manner.

 

Since December 2, 2013, our common stock has been traded on NYSE MKT under the symbol LIQT. Because there is limited volume of our common stock, investors may not be able to liquidate their investments when they desire to do so.

 

In addition, if we fail to meet the criteria set forth in SEC and NYSE MKT rules and regulations, various requirements would be imposed by law on broker-dealers who sell our securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. Consequently, such regulations may deter broker-dealers from recommending or selling our common stock, which may further affect its liquidity.

 

If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they downgrade us or our sector, the price of our common stock could decline.

 

The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business. We do not control these analysts. Furthermore, if one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrades us or the industry in which we operate or the stock of any of our competitors, the price of our common stock will probably decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage altogether, we could lose visibility, which could also lead to a decline in the price of our common stock. 

 

 

The market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile.

 

The market price of our common stock has been volatile, and fluctuates widely in price in response to various factors which are beyond our control. The price of our common stock is not necessarily indicative of our operating performance or long-term business prospects. In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Factors such as the following could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially:

 

• the underlying price of the commodities in the industrial water filtration, marine, oil and gas industries;

• announcements of capital budget changes by a major customer;

• the introduction of new products by our competitors;

• announcements of technology advances by us or our competitors;

• current events affecting the political and economic environment in the United States, Europe or Asia;

• conditions or industry trends, including demand for our products, services and technological advances;

• changes to financial estimates by us or by any securities analysts who might cover our stock;

• additions or departures of our key personnel;

• government regulation of our industry;

• seasonal, economic, or financial conditions;

• our quarterly operating and financial results; or

• litigation or public concern about the safety of our products.

 

The realization of any of these risks and other factors beyond our control could cause the market price of our common stock to decline significantly. In particular, the market price of our common stock may be influenced by changes in governmental regulations regarding diesel particles emissions and marine waste water, because demand for our products and services is closely related to those products. The stock market in general experiences, from time to time, extreme price and volume fluctuations. Periodic and/or continuous market fluctuations could result in extreme volatility in the price of our common stock, which could cause a decline in the value of our common stock. Price volatility may be worse if the trading volume of our common stock is low.

 

Our existing shareholders could experience further dilution if we elect to raise equity capital to meet our liquidity needs or to finance strategic transactions.

 

As part of our strategy, we may desire to raise capital, issue stock to employees, and or utilize our preferred or common stock to effect strategic business transactions, any of which will likely require that we issue equity (or debt) securities which would result in dilution to our existing stockholders. Although we anticipate attempting to minimize the dilutive impact of any future capital-raising activities or business transactions, we cannot offer any assurance that we will be effectively able to do so.

 

Future sales of our common stock, or the perception that future sales may occur, may cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

 

If any significant number of our outstanding shares are sold, such sales could have a depressive effect on the market price of our stock. We are unable to predict the effect, if any, that the sale of shares, or the availability of shares for future sale, will have on the market price of the shares prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of shares in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could depress prevailing market prices for the shares. Such sales may also make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price which we deem appropriate.

 

The Company is considered a “smaller reporting company” and is exempt from certain disclosure requirements, which could make our common stock less attractive to potential investors.

 

Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") defines a “smaller reporting company” as an issuer that is not an investment company, an asset-backed issuer, or a majority-owned subsidiary of a parent that is not a smaller reporting company and that:

 

●

Had a public float of less than $75 million as of the last business day of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter, computed by multiplying the aggregate worldwide number of shares of its voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates by the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average of the bid and asked prices of common equity, in the principal market for the common equity; or

 

●

In the case of an initial registration statement under the Securities Act or Exchange Act for shares of its common equity, had a public float of less than $75 million as of a date within 30 days of the date of the filing of the registration statement, computed by multiplying the aggregate worldwide number of such shares held by non-affiliates before the registration plus, in the case of a Securities Act registration statement, the number of such shares included in the registration statement by the estimated public offering price of the shares; or

 

 

●

In the case of an issuer whose public float as calculated under paragraph (1) or (2) of this definition was zero, had annual revenues of less than $50 million during the most recently completed fiscal year for which audited financial statements are available.

 

As a “smaller reporting company” we are not required and may not include a Compensation Discussion and Analysis section in our proxy statements; we provide only 3 years of business development information; provide fewer years of selected financial data; and have other “scaled” disclosure requirements that are less comprehensive than issuers that are not “smaller reporting companies” which could make our stock less attractive to potential investors, which could make it more difficult for you to sell your shares.

 

The market price and trading volume of our common stock may be volatile, which may adversely affect its market price.

 

The market price of our common stock could be subject to significant fluctuations due to factors such as:

 

●

actual or anticipated fluctuations in our financial condition or results of operations;

 

●

the success or failure of our operating strategies and our perceived prospects; realization of any of the risks described in this section; failure to be covered by securities analysts or failure to meet the expectations of securities analysts;

 

●

a decline in the stock prices of peer companies; and

 

●

a discount in the trading multiple of our common stock relative to that of common stock of certain of our peer companies due to perceived risks associated with our smaller size.

 

As a result, shares of our common stock may trade at prices significantly below the price you paid to acquire them. Furthermore, declines in the price of our common stock may adversely affect our ability to conduct future offerings or to recruit and retain key employees, including our managing directors and other key professional employees.

 

We have no current plan to pay dividends on our common stock, and investors may lose the entire amount of their investment.

 

We have no current plans to pay dividends on our common stock. Therefore, investors will not receive any funds absent a sale of their shares. We cannot assure investors of a positive return on their investment when they sell their shares nor can we assure that investors will not lose the entire amount of their investment.

 

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

  

Item 2.

Properties

 

Our corporate headquarters are located at Industriparken 22C, 2750 Ballerup, Denmark. We lease approximately 55,000 square feet at our Ballerup location, of which approximately 10,000 square feet is used for office space and 45,000 square feet is used for production. The lease will expire on August 31, 2018. Our U.S. operations are located at 1800 - 1808 Buerkle Road White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 where we lease approximately an aggregate of 25,700 square feet, of which 6,000 square feet is used for office space and 19,700 square feet is used for production. The lease will expire on March 1, 2021. Our LiqTech Systems operations are located at Benshøj Industrivej 24, 9500 Hobro, Denmark. We lease approximately 20,699 square feet at our Hobro location, of which approximately 3,550 square feet is used for office space and 17,149 square feet is used for production. The lease will expire on May 31, 2018. Until June 30, 2017, our LiqTech Systems operations had leased an additional 6,060 square feet in Hobro, at Bornholmsvej 3C, Denmark.

 

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

 

From time to time, we may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business. Except as set forth below, as of December 31, 2017, we were not a party to any legal proceeding that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

 

On September 9, 2014, Mr. Raffaele Bruno Tronchetti Provera (“Plaintiff”), the 60% owner of LiqTech Italy s.r.l. (the “Venture”), sued LiqTech International A/S, the 40% owner of the Venture (“Defendant”), 750,000 Euros before the Court of Como, Italy alleging, among other things, that certain products provided by Defendant to the Venture were defective. We expect but cannot be sure that the next hearing scheduled for March 14, 2018 will be the final hearing. We do not know when a decision will be rendered. Defendant believes that the claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend any litigation.

 

 

On December 20, 2017, the Company received a demand for approximately $1,098,678 from the previous installation of a water treatment system. The customer is disputing the system complies with the contact based on testing inputs to the system outside the parameters of the contract. The Company has completed the installation of the system and tested the system and contends it is compliance with the contract’s requirements.  The company currently plans to vigorously pursue collection of the remaining balance owed on the contract, through legal action if required. The company cannot reasonably estimate the outcome of these uncertainties. No legal action has been initiated to date by either party. At December 31, 2017, the Company has a $0 and $809,917 of receivables and unbilled revenue on a long term contract, respectively. During 2017, the Company has written off the cost in excess of billings of $402,653, as the contract is now being disputed and collection is uncertain. 

 

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

Not applicable. 

 

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Our common stock is currently quoted on NYSE MKT under the symbol LIQT. The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices for the common stock for the periods indicated:

 

2018		High				Low
1st Quarter (through March 19, 2018)		$	0.54			$	0.30

 

2017		High				Low
4th Quarter		$	0.57			$	0.28
3rd Quarter			0.44				0.31
2nd Quarter			0.43				0.26
1st Quarter			0.67				0.36

 

2016		High				Low
4th Quarter		$	0.83			$	0.59
3rd Quarter			0.97				0.64
2nd Quarter			0.85				0.58
1st Quarter			1.01				0.69

 

2015		High				Low
4th Quarter		$	1.47			$	0.89
3rd Quarter			1.14				0.70
2nd Quarter			0.94				0.66
1st Quarter			1.17				0.67

 

  

The above table is based on a report provided by the NYSE MKT. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commissions, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. 

 

Based upon information supplied to us by our transfer agent as of March 1, 2018, we had approximately 51 stockholders of record.

 

We have not declared or paid any dividends and do not intend to declare or pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Instead, we generally intend to invest any future earnings in our business. Subject to Nevada law, our Board of Directors will determine the payment of future dividends on our common stock, if any, and the amount of any dividends in light of:

 

	●	any contractual restrictions limiting our ability to pay dividends that may be applicable at such time;
	●	our earnings and cash flow;

 

 

	●	our capital requirements;
	●	our financial condition; and
	●	other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant.

 

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

 

We are not required to provide selected financial data disclosures because we are a smaller reporting company.

 

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Forward Looking Statements

 

Certain statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are “forward-looking statements” regarding the plans and objectives of management for future operations and market trends and expectations. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Our plans and objectives are based, in part, on assumptions involving the continued expansion of our business. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control.  Although we believe that our assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.   

 

Overview

 

We are a Nevada corporation, formerly named Blue Moose Media, Inc. In October, 2011, we changed our name to LiqTech International, Inc. For more than a decade we have developed and provided state-of-the-art technologies for gas and liquid purification using ceramic silicon carbide filters, particularly highly specialized filters for the control of soot exhaust particles from diesel engines and for liquid filtration. Using nanotechnology, LiqTech develops products using proprietary silicon carbide technology. LiqTech's products are based on unique silicon carbide membranes which facilitate new applications and improve existing technologies. In particular, LiqTech Systems A/S (www.provital.dk), the Company's subsidiary, has developed a new standard of water filtration technology to meet the ever increasing demand for higher water quality. By incorporating LiqTech's SiC liquid membrane technology with its longstanding systems design experience and capabilities it offers solutions to the most difficult water pollution problem.

  

Acquisition of LiqTech Systems

 

On the July 29, 2014, the Company, through its subsidiary, LiqTech Int. DK, completed the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding capital stock (the "Shares") of Provital Solutions A/S, a Danish company (now known as LiqTech Systems) from Masu A/S, a Danish company ("MASU") controlled by Sune Mathiesen. In consideration for the Shares, MASU received cash consideration in the sum of DKK12,600,000, that is, approximately $2,300,000 (at July 28, 2014), and 4,044,782 shares of the Company's common stock (the "Payment Shares"). Two-thirds (2/3) of the Payment Shares were held in escrow and subject to achievement of certain milestones. The milestones were not achieved and such Payment Shares were forfeited and returned to treasury on December 31, 2016.

 

2017 Developments

  

On January 5, 2017, we announced that we and Grundfos Biobooster A/S (Grundfos) have signed a framework agreement for the delivery of silicon carbide ceramic discs. The agreement has a minimum value of $450,000 and an initial term of 2 years. The ceramic discs will be used in Grundfos´s Ultra Filtration systems for water re-use.

 

On January 17, 2017, we announced that we had received a $120,000 order for the Company´s water treatment systems for flue gas condensate. The order was received from Tjæreborg Industri A/S, a Danish company who specializes in the development and manufacturing of equipment for power plants. The system has been installed at Uldum Varmeværk, Denmark in 2017.

 

 

On April 17, 2017, we announced that we had received a $480,000 order for the Company´s standardized systems for treatment of waste water from marine scrubbers.

 

On May 15, 2017, we announced that we had received a $380,000 order for the Company´s system for treatment of waste water from marine scrubbers. The order is from a new customer and includes an option for further two systems.

 

On May 19, 2017, we announced that we had received subscription agreements for 7,300,000 new shares at a price of $0.25 per share. The private placement was made directly by LiqTech and the Company plans to use the net proceeds of $1,825,000 million for acceleration of its business in the marine scrubber industry.

 

On June 8, 2017, we announced that we had been informed by Hunan Yonker Investment Group (Yonker) that its application for a USD 4 million investment in LiqTech has been declined by the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC).

 

On June 14, 2017, we announced that we had received a $290,000 order for the Company´s system for treatment of waste water from marine scrubbers.

 

On August 28, 2017, we announced that we had received two new orders for the Company's systems for treatment of waste water from marine scrubbers.

 

On November 22, 2017, we completed a private placement of 2,200,837 shares of preferred stock (1 to 4 conversion rate) or 8,803,348 shares of our common stock at a per share price of $1.20 per preferred share for aggregate proceeds of $2,641,004,40.

 

On December 11, 2017, we announced that we had received three new orders for the Company's standardized systems for treatment of waste water from marine scrubbers. The orders came from two different customers.

 

2018 Developments

 

On January 9, 2018, we announced that we had received three new orders for the Company´s standardized systems for swimming pool water treatment. The systems will be delivered to three new spas in Australia.

 

On February 22, 2018, we announced that we had received a $440,000 order for the Company´s Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) from a Chinese customer. The order is expected to be delivered in the second quarter of 2018.

 

Results of Operations

 

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2016 

 

The following table sets forth our revenues, expenses and net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

  

		For the Year Ending December 31,
																		Period to Period Change
		2017				As a % of Sales				2016				As a % of Sales				$				Percent %
Net Sales			11,343,177				100	%			13,906,394				100	%			(2,563,217	)			(18.4	)
Cost of Goods Sold			11,136,426				98.2				12,473,965				89.7				(1,337,539	)			(10.7	)
Gross Profit			206,751				1.8				1,432,429				10.3				(1,225,678	)			(85.6	)
Operating Expenses
Selling expenses			1,944,989				17.1				2,164,780				15.6				(219,791	)			(10.2	)
General and administrative expenses			2,153,225				19.0				3,997,304				28.7				(1,844,079	)			(46.1	)
Non-cash compensation expenses			178,944				1.6				435,794				3.1				(256,850	)			(58.9	)
Research and development expenses			536,848				4.7				626,147				4.5				(89,299	)			(14.3	)
Impairment of goodwill			-				-				7,343,208				52.8				(7,343,208	)			(100.0	)
Total Operating Expenses			4,814,006				42.4				14,567,233				104.8				(9,753,227	)			(67.0	)
Loss from Operating			(4,607,255	)			(40.6	)			(13,134,804	)			(94.5	)			8,527,549				(64.9	)
Other Income (Expense)
Interest and other income			1,515				0.0				968				0.0				547				56.5
Interest (expense)			(45,888	)			(0.4	)			(38,945	)			(0.3	)			(6,943	)			17.8
Loss on investments			-				-				(16,621	)			(0.1	)			16,621				(100.0	)
Loss on currency transactions			(102,470	)			(0.9	)			(9,555	)			(0.1	)			(92,915	)			972.4
Loss on sale of fixed assets			(24,065	)			(0.2	)			-				0.0				(24,065	)			-
Total Other Income (Expense)			(170,908	)			(1.5	)			(64,153	)			(0.5	)			(106,755	)			166.4
Income (loss) Before Income Taxes			(4,778,163	)			(42.1	)			(13,198,957	)			(94.9	)			8,420,794				(63.8	)
Income Taxes Expense (Benefit)			(317,810	)			(2.8	)			3,219,677				23.2				(2,901,867	)			(90.1	)
Net Income (Loss)			(4,460,353	)			(39.3	)			(16,418,634	)			(118.1	)			11,958,281				(72.8	)

 

 

Revenues

 

Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $11,343,177 compared to $13,906,394 for the same period in 2016, representing a decrease of $2,563,217, or 18.4%. The decrease in sales consist of an increase in sales of DPFs of $1,409,623, a decrease in sales of liquid filters of $3,743,655 and a decrease in sales of kiln furniture $229,185 respectively. The increase in demand for our DPFs is mainly due to an increase in market activity in China compared to the same period last year. The decrease in demand for our liquid filters and systems is due significant larger water filtrations systems sales in 2016 compared to 2017 and the delay in marine scrubber systems sales anticipated in 2017 compared to 2016. The decrease in demand for our kiln furniture is due to our decision to close down this product line. 

 

Gross Profit

 

 Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $206,751 compared to $1,432,429 for the same period in 2016, representing a decrease of $1,225,678, or 85.6%. The decrease in gross profit was due to lower sales activity in general, lower gross margin and due to lower sales activity for our liquid filters and systems, which historically have a higher gross margin, compared to the same period in 2016. Included in the gross profit is depreciation of $939,500 and $1,378,277 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

 

Expenses

 

 Total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $4,814,006, representing a decrease of $9,753,227 or 67.0%, compared to $14,567,233 for the same period in 2016. This decrease in operating expenses is attributable to a decrease in selling expenses of $219,791 or 10.2%, a decrease in general and administrative expenses of $1,844,079 or 46.1%, a decrease in non-cash compensation expenses of $256,850 or 58.9%, a decrease in research and development expenses of $89,299 or 14.3% and a decrease in impairment of goodwill of $7,343,208 compared to the same period in 2016.

 

Selling expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $1,944,989 compared to $2,164,780 for the same period in 2016, representing a decrease of $219,791 or 10.2%. This decrease is attributable to a cost reduction in selling expenses in general and a centralization of the sales structure for the year ending December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.

 

General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $2,153,225 compared to $3,997,304 for the same period in 2016, representing a decrease of $1,844,079, or 46.1%. This decrease is attributable to a general cost reduction in general and administrative a decrease in the provision for bad debt of approx. $1.3 million.

 

Non-cash compensation expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $178,944 compared to $435,794 for the same period in 2016, representing a decrease of $256,850 or 58.9%. This decrease is attributable to decreased non-cash compensation expense for stock options granted to employees and warrants issued for services offset by an increase in non-cash compensation expense for stock awards issued to the board of directors. 

 

The following is a summary of our non-cash compensation:

 

		2017				2016
Compensation upon vesting of stock options granted to employees		$	70,477			$	307,493
Compensation for vesting of restricted stock awards issued to the board of directors			90,833				77,667
Value of warrants issued for services			17,634				50,634
Total		$	178,944			$	435,794

 

 

Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $536,848 compared to $626,147 for the same period in 2016, representing a decrease of $89,299, or 14.3%. This decrease is attributable to decreased research and development expenditures for the period ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 as the Company focuses on the marine scrubber industry.

 

Impairment of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $0 compared to $7,343,208 for the same period in 2016, representing a decrease of $7,343,208. The Company recorded an impairment charge on goodwill, during the year ended December 31, 2016, as managements estimated fair value of the reporting unit did not exceeded the carrying value during 2016 fourth quarter testing.

  

Net Loss

 

Net loss attributable to the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017 was a loss of $4,460,353 compared to a loss of $16,418,634 for the comparable period in 2016, representing a decrease in loss of $11,958,281

 

This improvement was primarily attributable to a decrease in operating expenses of $9,753,227, a decrease in tax expenses of $2,901,867 offset by a decrease in our gross profit of $1,225,678. The largest contributor to the decrease in operating expenses was the impairment write down of $7,343,208, which the Company made in 2016.

   

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2015 

 

The following table sets forth our revenues, expenses and net income for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

  

																		Period to Period Change
		2016				As a % of Sales				2015				As a % of Sales				$				Percent %
Net Sales			13,906,394				100	%			15,812,587				100	%			(1,906,193	)			(12.1	)
Cost of Goods Sold			12,473,965				89.7				12,598,163				79.7				(124,198	)			(1.0	)
Gross Profit			1,432,429				10.3				3,214,424				20.3				(1,781,995	)			(54.4	)
Operating Expenses
Selling expenses			2,164,780				15.6				2,721,781				17.2				(557,001	)			(20.5	)
General and administrative expenses			3,997,304				28.7				2,814,747				17.8				1,182,557				42.0
Non-cash compensation expenses			435,794				3.1				369,531				2.3				66,263				17.9
Research and development expenses			626,147				4.5				707,844				4.5				(81,697	)			(11.5	)
Impairment of goodwill			7,343,208				52.8				-				-				7,343,208				-
Total Operating Expenses			14,567,233				104.8				6,613,903				41.8				7,953,330				120.3
Loss from Operating			(13,134,804	)			(94.5	)			(3,399,479	)			(21.5	)			(9,735,325	)			286.4
Other Income (Expense)
Interest and other income			968				0.0				98,171				0.6				(97,203	)			(99.0	)
Interest (Expense)			(38,945	)			(0.3	)			(51,232	)			(0.3	)			12,287				(24.0	)
Gain (Loss) on investments			(16,621	)			(0.1	)			7,253				0.0				(23,874	)			(329.2	)
Gain (Loss) on currency transactions			(9,555	)			(0.1	)			459,279				2.9				(468,834	)			(102.1	)
Total Other Income (Expense)			(64,153	)			(0.5	)			513,471				3.2				(577,624	)			(112.5	)
Loss Before Income Taxes			(13,198,957	)			(94.9	)			(2,886,008	)			(18.3	)			(10,312,949	)			357.3
Income Taxes Expense (Benefit)			3,219,677				23.2				(697,786	)			(4.4	)			3,917,463				(561.4	)
Net Loss			(16,418,634	)			(118.1	)			(2,188,222	)			(13.8	)			(14,230,412	)			650.3
Less net income attributable to the non-controlled interest in subsidiaries			-				-				21,635				0.1				(21,635	)			(100.0	)
Net Loss attributable to LiqTech			(16,418,634	)			(118.1	)			(2,209,857	)			(14.0	)			(14,208,777	)			643.0

 

 

Revenues

 

Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $13,906,394 compared to $15,812,587 for the same period in 2015, representing a decrease of $1,906,193, or 12%. The decrease in sales consist of an increase in sales of DPFs of $739,488, a decrease in sales of liquid filters of $2,615,931 and a decrease in sales of kiln furniture $29,751 respectively. The increase in demand for our DPFs is mainly due to an increase in market activity in China compared to the same period last year. The decrease in demand for our liquid filters and systems is due to a delay in certain business opportunities compared to the same period last year where various projects were realized. The decrease in demand for our kiln furniture is due to our decision to not focus on this product line anymore. 

 

Gross Profit

 

 Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1,432,429 compared to $3,214,424 for the same period in 2015, representing a decrease of $1,781,995, or 55%. The decrease in gross profit was due to a lower sales activity for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 and an increase in the reserve for obsolete inventory. Included in the gross profit is depreciation of $1,378,277 and $1,437,787 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

Expenses

 

 Total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $14,567,233, representing an increase of $7,953,330, or 120%, compared to $6,613,903 for the same period in 2015. This increase in operating expenses is attributable to an increase in impairment charge of goodwill of $7,343,208, an increase in general and administrative expenses of $1,182,557 or 42% and an increase in non-cash compensation expenses of $66,263 or 18%, and this is partially offset by a decrease in selling and marketing expenses of $557,001 or 21% and a decrease in research and development expenses of $81,697 or 12% compared to the same period in 2015. 

 

Selling expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $2,164,780 compared to $2,721,781 for the same period in 2015, representing a decrease of $557,001 or 21%. This decrease is attributable to a cost reduction in selling expenses in general. Furthermore, the increase of USD against EURO and DKK of approximately 3% from period to period has had a decreasing effect on our expenses in 2016, because a significant amount of our expenses is in EURO and DKK.

 

General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $3,997,304 compared to $2,814,747 for the same period in 2015, representing an increase of $1,182,557, or 42%. This increase is attributable to a cost reduction in general and administrative cost offset by an increase in the provision for bad debt of $1,437,949.

 

Non-cash compensation expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $435,794 compared to $369,531 for the same period in 2015, representing an increase of $66,263 or 18%. This increase is attributable to increased non-cash compensation expense for options, shares and warrants for services performed granted to directors, employees and management. 

 

The following is a summary of our non-cash compensation:

 

		2016				2015
Compensation upon vesting of stock options granted to employees		$	307,493			$	154,745
Compensation for vesting of restricted stock awards issued to the board of directors			77,667				204,500
Value of warrants issued for services			50,634				10,286
Total		$	435,794			$	369,531

 

Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $626,147 compared to $707,844 for the same period in 2015, representing a decrease of $81,697, or 12%. This decrease is attributable to decreased research and development expenditures for the period ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015.

 

Impairment of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $7,343,208 compared to $0 for the same period in 2015, representing an increase of $7,343,208. The Company recorded an impairment charge on goodwill, during the year ended December 31, 2016, as managements estimated fair value of the reporting unit did not exceeded the carrying value during 2016 fourth quarter testing.

  

Net Loss

 

Net loss attributable to the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 was a loss of $16,418,634 compared to a loss of $2,209,857 for the comparable period in 2015, representing an increase of $14,208,777.

 

This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease of $1,781,995 in our gross profit, an increase in operating expenses of $7,953,330, and a decrease in total other income of $577,624. The largest contributor to the increase in operating expenses was the impairment write down of $7,343,208.

 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

 The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, the Company has limited cash and incurred significant recent losses raising substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. In the event that the Company is unable to raise funds, the Company will be required to reduce or curtail operations.

 

We have historically satisfied our capital and liquidity requirements through offerings of equity instruments, internally generated cash from operations and our available lines of credit. At the filing date, the Company did not have any available lines of credit with any lender. At December 31, 2017, we had cash of $2,486,199 and working capital of $4,659,877 and at December 31, 2016, we had cash of $1,208,650 and working capital of $3,497,578. At December 31, 2017, our working capital increased by $1,162,299, compared to December 31, 2016. Total current assets were $9,427,697 and $8,506,321 at December 31, 2017 and at December 31, 2016, respectively, and total current liabilities were $4,767,820 and $5,008,743 at December 31, 2017 and at December 31, 2016, respectively.

 

In connection with certain orders, we have to give the customer a working guarantee or a prepayment guarantee or security bond. For that purpose, we previously had a guarantee credit line of DKK 94,620 (approximately $15,193 at December 31, 2017) with a bank, subject to certain base limitations. As of December 31, 2017, we had DKK 94,620 (approximately $15,193) in working guarantee against the line. This line of credit is guaranteed by Vækstfonden (the Danish state's investments fund) and is secured by certain assets of LiqTech Systems such as receivables, inventory and equipment.

 

  We will need additional funds to sustain our business. We may raise such funds from time to time through public or private sales of equity or debt securities. Financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all, and our failure to raise capital when needed could materially adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. Additional equity financing may be dilutive to holders of our common stock, and debt financing, if available, may involve significant cash payment obligations and covenants that restrict our ability to operate our business. In the event that the Company is unable to raise funds, there is substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

 

Cash Flows

 

Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016

 

 Cash provided (used) by operating activities is net income (losses) adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities. Cash used by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $3,315,362 , representing a decrease of $3,731,156 compared to cash provided by operating activities of $415,794 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The $3,731,156 decrease in cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 was mainly due to decreases in account payable of $487,458, a net loss of $4,460,352 and increase in accounts receivables of $241,256, offset by a decrease in inventory of $564,359, an increase in accrued expenses of $80,797, and an increase in long-term contracts of $353,070.

 

The decreases in accounts payable, the net loss, the increase in accounts receivables, the decrease in inventory, the increase in accrued expenses and the increase in long-term contracts were all due to normal variations in the ordinary course of business.

 

Cash used in investing activities was $123,673 for the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to cash used in investing activities of $373,740 for the year ended December 31, 2016. Cash used in investing activities decreased of $250,067 for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This decrease was due to a period over period decrease of $236,067 in the purchase of property and proceeds from sale of property and equipment of $14,001 in 2017.

 

Cash provided by financing activities was $4,101,700 for the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to cash used by financing activities of $202,619 for the year ended December 31, 2016. This change of $4,307,319 in cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, was mainly due to cash received in connection with the private placement on May 19, 2017 where the Company raised $1,825,000 issuing 7,300,000 shares of common stock and cash received in connection with the private placement in November 2017 where the Company raised $2,641,004 issuing 2,200,837 Mandatory Convertible Preferred shares. The Mandatory Convertible Preferred shares, which will automatically convert into a minimum of 8,803,348 common shares no later than May 14, 2018.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015

 

 Cash provided (used) by operating activities is net income (losses) adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities. Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $415,794, representing an increase of $2,506,758 compared to cash used by operating activities of $2,090,964 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The $2,506,758 increase in cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was mainly due to decreases in accounts receivable of $841,918, a decrease in accrued expenses of $1,018,643 and a decrease in long term contracts of $1,807,658 offset by an increase in inventory of $547,934 and a decrease in accounts payable of $1,192,386.

 

 

The decreases in accounts receivable, the decrease in accrued expenses, the decrease in long term contracts, the increase in inventory and the decrease in accounts payable were all due to normal variations in the ordinary course of business.

 

Cash used in investing activities was $373,740 for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to cash used in investing activities of $592,656 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Cash used in investing activities decreased of $218,916 for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. This decrease was primarily due to the period over period decrease of $202,538 in the purchase of property and equipment.

 

Cash used by financing activities was $202,619 for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to cash provided by financing activities of 223,072 for the year ended December 31, 2015. This decrease in cash used by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to 2015, was mainly due to a decrease in payments proceeds on capital lease obligations offset by payments on loans payable.

 

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of December 31, 2017, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements other than normal operating leases. We are not aware of any material transactions which are not disclosed in our consolidated financial statements.

 

Operating Leases -- The Company leases office and production facilities under operating lease agreements expiring in March 2021, August 2018, and May 2018. In some of these lease agreements, the Company has the right to extend.

 

The future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2017 are as follows:

Year ending December 31,		Lease Payments
2018			388,421
2019			179,094
2020			182,676
2021			30,546
Thereafter			-
Total Minimum Lease Payments		$	780,737

 

Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates

 

The methods, estimates, and judgments that we use in applying our accounting policies have a significant impact on the results that we report in our consolidated financial statements. Some of our accounting policies require us to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates regarding matters that are inherently uncertain. Our most critical accounting estimates include:

 

	●	the assessment of collectability of accounts receivable, which impacts operating expenses when and if we record bad debt or adjust the allowance for doubtful accounts;
	●	the assessment of recoverability of long-lived assets, which impacts gross margin or operating expenses when and if we record asset impairments or accelerate their depreciation;
	●	the recognition and measurement of current and deferred income taxes (including the measurement of uncertain tax positions), which impact our provision for taxes;
	●	the valuation of inventory, which impacts gross margin; and
	●	the recognition and measurement of loss contingencies, which impact gross margin or operating expenses when we recognize a loss contingency, revise the estimate for a loss contingency, or record an asset impairment.

 

We discuss these policies further below, as well as the estimates and judgments involved. 

 

Accounts Receivable / Long Term Receivable / Allowance for Doubtful Accounts / Bad Debt

 

We assess the collectability of accounts receivable and long term receivable on an ongoing basis and establish an allowance for doubtful accounts when collection is no longer reasonably assured. In establishing the allowance, factors we consider include known troubled accounts, historical experience, age, and other currently available evidence.

    

 

The roll forward of the allowance for doubtful accounts for the year ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was as follows:

 

		2017				2016
Allowance for doubtful accounts at the beginning of the period		$	2,128,452			$	1,087,871
Bad debt expense			(102,189	)			1,437,949
Receivables written off during the period			(1,678,856	)			(252,792	)
Effect of currency translation			313,174				(144,576	)
Allowance for doubtful accounts at the end of the period		$	660,581			$	2,128,452

 

Goodwill and Definite-life intangible assets

 

The Company accounts for Goodwill and definite-life intangible assets in accordance with provisions of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 350, Intangibles, Goodwill and Other. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of Topic 350. Impairment losses arising from this impairment test, if any, are included in operating expenses in the period of impairment. Topic 350 requires that definite intangible assets with estimable useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with Topic 360, criteria for recognition of an impairment of Long-Lived Assets.

 

Goodwill

 

Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually in the fourth quarter of the Company’s fiscal year, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. Triggering events that may indicate impairment include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in customer demand or business climate that could affect the value of goodwill or a significant decrease in expected cash flows. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $0 and $7,343,208 on goodwill, during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, as management's estimated fair value of the reporting unit did not exceeded the carrying value during 2017 fourth quarter testing.

 

Long-Lived Assets

 

We assess the impairment of long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets or the asset grouping may not be recoverable. Factors that we consider in deciding when to perform an impairment review include significant under-performance of a business or product line in relation to expectations, significant negative industry or economic trends, and significant changes or planned changes in our use of the assets. We measure the recoverability of assets that will continue to be used in our operations by comparing the carrying value of the asset grouping to our estimate of the related total future undiscounted net cash flows. If an asset grouping’s carrying value is not recoverable through the related undiscounted cash flows, the asset grouping is considered to be impaired. The impairment is measured by comparing the difference between the asset grouping’s carrying value and its fair value. Long-lived assets such as goodwill, intangible assets, and property, plant and equipment are considered non-financial assets, and are recorded at fair value only if an impairment charge is recognized.

 

Impairments of long-lived assets are determined for groups of assets related to the lowest level of identifiable independent cash flows. Due to our asset usage model and the interchangeable nature of our ceramic filter manufacturing capacity, we must make subjective judgments in determining the independent cash flows that can be related to specific asset groupings. In addition, as we make manufacturing process conversions and other factory planning decisions, we must make subjective judgments regarding the remaining useful lives of assets, primarily process-specific filter manufacturing tools and building improvements. If we determine that the useful lives of assets are shorter than we had originally estimated, we accelerate the rate of depreciation over the assets’ new, shorter useful lives. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, no impairment charge of long-lived assets has been recorded. 

 

Revenue Recognition and Sales Incentives

 

The Company's accounts for revenue recognition in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” (SAB 101), FASB ASC 605 Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when rights and risk of ownership have passed to the customer, when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, product has been shipped or delivered to the customer, the price and terms are finalized, and collections of resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Products are primarily shipped FOB shipping point at which time title passes to the customer. In some instances, the Company uses common carriers for the delivery of products. In these arrangements, sales are recognized upon delivery to the customer. The Company's revenue arrangements with its customers often include early payment discounts and such sales incentives are recorded against sales.

 

The Company has received various grants from government entities for development and use of silicon carbide membranes in various water filtration and treatment applications. Revenues from grants are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of project costs incurred to date to estimated total project costs for each grant multiplied by the grant income on a project by project basis. This method is used because management considers costs incurred to be the best available measure of progress on contracts in process. 

 

 

Project costs of the grants include all direct material and labor costs and those indirect costs related to the project. Project costs are capitalized and accreted into cost of sales based on the percentage of the project completed. Should a loss be estimated on an incomplete project it would be recorded in the period in which such a loss is determined. Changes in estimated profitability of a project are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. The aggregate of costs incurred, and income recognized on incomplete projects are recorded as costs in excess of billings and are shown as a current asset. The aggregate of billings in excess of related costs incurred and income recognized on projects is shown as a current liability.

 

In Denmark, Value Added Tax (“VAT”) of 25% of the invoice amount is collected in respect of the sales of goods on behalf of tax authorities. The VAT collected is not revenue of the Company; instead, the amount is recorded as a liability on the balance sheet until such VAT is paid to the authorities.

 

Income Taxes

 

We must make estimates and judgments in determining the provision for taxes for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of tax credits, benefits, and deductions, and in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities that arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes. Significant changes in these estimates may result in an increase or decrease to our tax provision in a subsequent period.

 

We must assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets. If recovery is not likely, we must increase our provision for taxes by recording a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets that we estimate will not ultimately be recoverable. We believe that we will ultimately recover the deferred tax assets recorded on our consolidated balance sheets. However, should there be a change in our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, our tax provision would increase in the period in which we determined that the recovery was not likely. Recovery of a portion of our deferred tax assets is impacted by management's plans and methods of allocating research and development costs to the underlying reporting units.

 

The calculation of our tax liabilities involves uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in Denmark and the United States. When a tax position is determined uncertain, we recognize liabilities based on a two-step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. If we determine that a tax position will more likely than not be sustained on audit, the second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as we have to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. If uncertainties arise we re-evaluate the tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors such as changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, new audit activity, and effectively settled issues. Determining whether an uncertain tax position is effectively settled requires judgment. Such a change in recognition or measurement would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision.

 

Inventory

 

The valuation of inventory requires us to estimate obsolete or excess inventory as well as inventory that is not of saleable quality. The determination of obsolete or excess inventory requires us to estimate the future demand for our products. The estimate of future demand is compared to work-in-process and finished goods inventory levels to determine the amount, if any, of obsolete or excess inventory. As of December 31, 2017, we had total furnace parts and supplies of $400,589, raw material of $1,260,209, work-in-process inventory of $ 2,123,418, total finished goods inventory of $ 2,297,743 and a reserve for obsolescence of $1,409,074. The estimated future demand is included in the development of our short-term manufacturing plans to enable consistency between inventory valuation and build decisions. Product-specific facts and circumstances reviewed in the inventory valuation process include a review of the customer base, acceptance of the product by the customer and the various environmental authorities, competitor’s products, as well as an assessment of the selling price in relation to the product cost. If our demand forecast for specific products is greater than actual demand, and we fail to reduce manufacturing output accordingly, we could be required to write off inventory, which would negatively impact our gross margin.

 

In order to determine what costs can be included in the valuation of inventory, we must determine normal capacity at our manufacturing and assembly and test facilities, based on historical production, compared to total available capacity. If the factory production is below the established normal capacity level, a portion of our manufacturing overhead costs would not be included in the cost of inventory, and therefore would be recognized as cost of sales in that period, which would negatively impact our gross margin. We refer to these costs as excess capacity charges. The Company has been operating below capacity and excess capacity charges had been recognized as cost of sales.

  

 

Loss Contingencies

 

We are subject to various legal and administrative proceedings and asserted and potential claims, accruals related to product warranties and potential asset impairments (loss contingencies) that arise in the ordinary course of business. An estimated loss from such contingencies is recognized as a charge to income if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Disclosure of a loss contingency is required if there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss has been incurred. The outcomes of legal and administrative proceedings and claims, and the estimation of product warranties and asset impairments, are subject to significant uncertainty. Significant judgment is required in both the determination of probability and the determination as to whether a loss is reasonably estimable. With respect to estimating the losses associated with repairing and replacing parts in connection with product warranty, we make judgments with respect to customer claim rates. Current warranty estimates are immaterial for accrual or further disclosure. At least quarterly, we review the status of each significant matter, and we may revise our estimates. These revisions could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position. 

 

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

 

We are not required to provide quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk because we are a smaller reporting company.

 

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

 

Our financial statements are attached on the following “F” pages.

 

 

LIQTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

	Page
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016	F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016	F-4
Consolidated Statement of Other Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016	F-5
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016	F-6
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016	F-7
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	F-9

  

4397 SOUTH ALBRIGHT DRIVE, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84124 (801) 277-2763 PHONE

 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

LIQTECH INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Industriparken 22C, DK

2750 Ballerup, Denmark

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of LIQTECH INTERNATIONAL INC. and subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2017 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Explanatory Paragraph Regarding Going Concern

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered net losses since inception and has accumulated a significant deficit. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

Basis for Opinion

 

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal security laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

 

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our Audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

 

 

/s/ Gregory & Associates, LLC.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2011.

March 23, 2018

Salt Lake City, Utah

 

 

LIQTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

(Continued)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

  

 

LIQTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

LIQTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

LIQTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

LIQTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

For the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

 

 

 

 

LiqTech International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

 

 

LIQTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

  

On December 31, 2016, the Company canceled 2,696,521 common shares two-thirds (2/3) of the previously issued common shares held in escrow issued in connection with the Company through its subsidiary, LiqTech Int. DK, acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of LiqTech Systems A/S (formerly Provital Solutions A/S), as LiqTech Systems A/S failed to meet the 2014, 2015 and 2016 catchup gross revenue and EBITDA thresholds to merit the release from escrow.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None

 

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the design and effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures (pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) and (c) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on this evaluation, Management concluded that our controls were ineffective as of such date due to material weaknesses that were identified. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the registrant's financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Notwithstanding this finding of ineffective internal controls, we concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. During the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company was not subject to requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As such, our independent registered public accounting firm was not required to, and thus did not, audit our internal control structure.

 

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Because of these inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company's management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commissions (2013). Based upon this assessment, the Company's management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting had material weaknesses and was ineffective as of December 31, 2017. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination thereof, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We did not maintain effective controls over our day-to-day transaction processing, including non-routine transactions and period-end financial reporting processes. Specifically, we identified material weaknesses related to (i) Revenue recognition, (ii) Sufficient documentation of review- and analytical-processes, (iii) Structuring of duties, controls, and permission within financial systems. (iv) Segregation of duties, and (vi) Cash disbursements. In response to the identified material weakness, our management, with oversight from the Company’s Audit Committee, will dedicated necessary resources to enhance the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and remediate the identified material weakness. We believe that such an emphasis, together with continued oversight of our processes and systems, will help create an increasingly strong, compliant, and thorough system of controls, which we expect will play an increasingly important role in our long-term growth.

 

 

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

An internal control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by Management override of the internal control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to an exemption by the SEC, which permits the Company to provide only management’s report in this report. 

 

Item 9B.

Other Information

 

 None

  

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

Set forth below is information concerning our directors and senior executive officers as of March 23, 2018.

 

Name		Age		Titles
Aldo Petersen		56		Chairman of the Board
Sune Mathiesen		43		Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), Director
Soren Degn		48		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Alexander J. Buehler		42		Director
Mark Vernon		65		Director
Peyton Boswell		47		Director

 

 

According to our bylaws, the number of directors at any one time may not be less than one or more than seven. The maximum number of directors at any one time may be increased by a vote of a majority of the directors then serving.

  

Our charter provides for the annual election of directors. At each annual meeting of stockholders, our directors will be elected for a one-year term and serve until their respective successors have been elected and qualified. It is anticipated that the Board of Directors will meet at least quarterly.

 

Executive officers are appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. A brief biography of each director and executive officer follows:

 

Aldo Petersen. Aldo Petersen has been Chairman of the Board of LiqTech since August 2011. He has been the Chief Executive Officer of APE Invest A/S, a private Danish investment company, since 1996. Until 2006, Mr. Petersen was also the Chief Executive Officer of EuroTrust (formerly known as Telepartner), a former NASDAQ-listed company that he founded in 1986. Prior to EuroTrust, he started and sold one of Denmark’s first hedge funds, Dansk Formue Invest. Mr. Petersen was a major investor in Greentech, a renewable energy company that builds wind farms in Denmark, Germany, Poland and Italy. He is a private investor in wind farms in Germany and France, and was also a major investor in Football Club Copenhagen (listed on the Copenhagen Stock Exchange). Mr. Petersen has a B.A. degree in Economics from Copenhagen Business School.

 

Sune Mathiesen. Mr. Mathiesen was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and a Director of LiqTech International on July 29 2014. Mr. Mathiesen has served as Chief Executive Officer and as a Director of Masu A/S, a Danish company since February 2013. He has served as CEO and Director of the Board of Provital Solutions A/S since March 2012. Before that he served as Country Manager of Broen Lab Group since August 2010 and before that as Country Manager of GPA Flowsystem since February 2000. Mr. Mathiesen has a solid background in executive management, sales and turn-arounds. Mr. Mathiesen has been working hands-on with technical products within the valves and fittings industry for the past 16 years. He has a degree in commercial science from Via College in Randers, Denmark.

 

 

Soren Degn. Mr. Degn has served as Chief Financial Officer of LiqTech International, Inc. since August 2011. From 2008 until 2011, he was the Chief Financial Officer of Guava, a publicly listed internet advertising company. From 2007 to 2008, Mr. Degn served as Chief Financial Officer of Advance Renewable Energy Ltd. From 2001 to 2006, he was the Chief Financial Officer of EuroTrust (a NASDAQ/AIM listed company, formerly known as Telepartner). From 1996 to 2001, he was the financial controller at Kampsax (a consulting company). From 1989 to 1996, he worked at KPMG in Denmark. Mr. Degn has a B.A. degree in Business Administration and an M.B.A. from Copenhagen Business School.

 

Alexander J. Buehler. Mr. Buehler has served as the Chief Executive Officer and as a director of EMS USA, Inc., a provider of pipeline and facility maintenance and construction, since July of 2014. From May of 2011 to June of 2014, Mr. Buehler served as Chief Financial Officer of Energy Recovery, Inc., a publically traded provider of energy recovery products to the water, oil & gas, and chemical industries. Mr. Buehler previously served in executive leadership positions at Insituform Technologies, Inc., and worked for five years in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. He received a B.S. in Civil Engineering from the United States Military Academy at West Point and an MBA in Finance from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. 

 

 

Mark Vernon. Mr. Vernon has served as a Director of LiqTech International, Inc. since February 26, 2013. Mr. Vernon currently serves as a Director of Senior plc, a UK-based aerospace and industrial engineering business, following his appointment in May 2011. Mr. Vernon has had a distinguished career in the industrial engineering industry, with wide international business experience. In January 2014, Mr. Vernon retired as Chief Executive Officer and Director of Spirax-Sarco Engineering plc (London Stock Exchange: SPX),a designer and supplier of industrial steam systems and peristaltic pumping, after serving on the Spirax Board since 2006. He also served previously as Group Vice-president of Flowserve’s Flow Control Business Unit, Group Vice-president of Durco International and President of Valtek International. Mr. Vernon earned a BSc degree (magna cum laude) from Weber State University.

  

Peyton Boswell. Boswell has served as Managing Director of EnterSolar, LLC, a provider of commercial solar photovoltaic solutions, since September of 2010. Before joining EnterSolar, Mr. Boswell led solar development activities for Fortistar, and was the founder of RenewCo V.I., a renewable energy development firm based in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Prior to entering the solar industry, Peyton was a finance and investment banking professional for 15 years with J.P. Morgan and Bank of America, primarily focused on private equity transactions, M&A advisory services, and the coverage of corporate clients across a range of industry groups. Mr. Boswell is a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) and has a NABCEP Technical Sales Certification. He earned a BA from Cornell University and holds an MBA from Columbia Business School.

  

Director Expertise

 

The following is a brief description of the specific experience and qualifications, attributes or skills of each director that led to the conclusion that such person should serve as a director of the Company.

 

Mr. Petersen’s knowledge regarding our history and operations provides a critical link between management and the Board, enabling the Board to provide its oversight function with the benefit of management’s perspective of the business.

 

Mr. Buehler’s experience in general management and strategic planning as well as new product development, corporate development, operations management, manufacturing process optimization, sales management, and back-office administration.   Mr. Buehler has substantial experience in the global water, oil & gas, and manufacturing industries and was critical in a number of acquisitions. Mr. Buehler has been determined by our Board to be an Audit Committee Financial Expert. 

 

Mr. Vernon’s extensive global experience in the industrial engineering industry, particularly in North and South America, provides the Board with valuable insight in the markets the Company serves, as well as proven management and Board expertise.

 

Mr. Boswell's experience in establishing and growing a successful renewable energy clean tech business and prior experience in investment banking provides the Board with a unique perspective on corporate finance and strategic growth matters. Further, the Board has determined that he qualifies as an Audit Committee Financial Expert.

 

Mr. Mathiesen’s prior experience at leading businesses as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of companies in the technical products space distinguish him as an integral part of the Company’s management team. He is uniquely qualified to provide a perspective on matters involving the continued growth and development of the Company.

  

Family Relationships

 

None of our Directors or executive officers is related by blood, marriage or adoption.

  

Director Independence

 

Our Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Buehler, Vernon and Boswell are independent as that term is defined in the listing standards of the NYSE. In making these determinations, our Board of Directors has concluded that none of our independent directors has an employment, business, family or other relationship, which, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Our other director, Mr. Petersen, is not considered independent under these rules because Mr. Petersen has influence as a significant stockholder. Mr. Mathiesen is not considered independent under these rules because Mr. Mathiesen has influence as a significant stockholder and as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. We expect that our independent directors will meet in executive session (without the participation of executive officers or other non-independent directors) at least two times each year.

 

Director Attendance at Board and Stockholder Meetings

 

The board of directors met formally twelve times during 2017. During 2017, each director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the board and the committees upon which he or she serves.

 

 

We do not have a policy regarding director attendance at our annual meetings of stockholders. Directors Aldo Petersen and Sune Mathiesen both attended our annual meeting of stockholders held on November 7, 2017.

 

Committees of our Board of Directors

 

Committee Composition

 

Our Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Governance Committee. The following table sets forth the current membership of each of these committees: 

 

Audit Committee		Compensation Committee		Governance Committee
Alexander J. Buehler *		Mark Vernon *		Mark Vernon *
Mark Vernon		Alexander J. Buehler		Alexander J. Buehler
Peyton Boswell		Peyton Boswell		Peyton Boswell
* Chairman of the committee

 

Audit Committee

 

Our Audit Committee consists of Alexander J. Buehler (Chair), Mark Vernon and Peyton Boswell each of whom is an independent director as defined in the NYSE rules and SEC rules. Based upon past employment experience in finance and other business experience requiring accounting knowledge and financial sophistication, our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Buehler is an “Audit Committee Financial Expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K, and that each member of our Audit Committee is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements. We have implemented a written charter for our Audit Committee that provides that our Audit Committee is responsible for:

 

●

appointing, compensating, retaining, overseeing and terminating our independent auditors and pre-approving all audit and non-audit services permitted to be performed by the independent auditors;

 

●

discussing with management and the independent auditors our annual audited financial statements, our internal control over financial reporting, and related matters;

 

●

reviewing and approving any related party transactions;

 

●

meeting separately, periodically, with management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors;

 

●

annually reviewing and reassessing the adequacy of our Audit Committee charter;

 

●

such other matters that are specifically delegated to our Audit Committee by our Board of Directors from time to time; and

 

●

reporting regularly to the Board of Directors.

 

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, the Audit Committee met four times.

 

Compensation Committee

 

Our Compensation Committee consists of Mark Vernon (Chair), Alexander J. Buehler and Peyton Boswell, each of whom is an independent director as defined in the NYSE rules, a “non-employee director” under Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code. We have implemented a written charter for our Compensation Committee that provides that our Compensation Committee is responsible for:

 

	●	reviewing and making recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding our compensation policies and forms of compensation provided to our directors and officers;
	●	reviewing and making recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding bonuses for our officers and other employees;
	●	reviewing and making recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding stock-based compensation for our directors and officers;
	●	administering our stock option plans in accordance with the terms thereof; and

 

 

●

such other matters that are specifically delegated to the Compensation Committee by our Board of Directors after the business combination from time to time.

 

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, the Compensation Committee met two times.  

 

Governance Committee

 

Our Governance Committee consists of Mark Vernon (Chair), Alexander J. Buehler and Peyton Boswell. Mr. Vernon is an independent director as defined in the NYSE rules. We have implemented a written charter for our Governance Committee that provides that our Governance Committee is responsible for:

 

	●	overseeing the process by which individuals may be nominated to our Board of Directors;
	●	identifying potential directors and making recommendations as to the size, functions and composition of our Board of Directors and its committees;
	●	considering nominees proposed by our stockholders;
	●	establishing and periodically assessing the criteria for the selection of potential directors;
	●	making recommendations to the Board of Directors on new candidates for Board membership; and
	●	overseeing corporate governance matters.

  

In making nominations, the Governance Committee intends to submit candidates who have high personal and professional integrity, who have demonstrated exceptional ability and judgment and who are effective, in conjunction with the other nominees to the Board of Directors, in collectively serving the long-term interests of the stockholders. In evaluating nominees, the Governance Committee intends to take into consideration attributes such as leadership, independence, interpersonal skills, financial acumen, business experiences, industry knowledge, and diversity of viewpoints.

 

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, the Governance Committee met five times.

 

Legal Proceedings Involving Officers and Directors

 

To the knowledge of the Company after reasonable inquiry, no current director or executive officer of the Company during the past ten years, has (i) been convicted in a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations or other minor offenses), (ii) been a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding (except for any matters that were dismissed without sanction or settlement) that resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, U.S. federal or state securities laws, or a finding of any violation of U.S. federal or state securities laws, (iii) filed a petition under federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency laws or has had a receiver appointed for the person’s property or (iv) been subject to any judgment, decree or final order enjoining, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days, the person from engaging in any type of business practice, acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity or engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws, (v) been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated, (vi) been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, (vii) been the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of: (a) any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation, (b) any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order, or (c) any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity, or (viii) been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26)), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29)), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

 

 

Code of Ethics

 

 We adopted a code of conduct and ethics on January 1, 2012. The code of ethics has been posted on the Company’s website.

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires a company’s officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent (10%) of a registered class of a company’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Officers, directors, and greater than ten percent (10%) stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. 

  

To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us, we believe that all reports under Section 16(a) required to be filed by its officers and directors were timely filed. Norman H. Pessin, Sandra F. Pessin and Brian Pessin, who are greater than ten percent (10%) beneficial owners, have not filed all reports required under Section 16(a).  

 

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to compensation for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 earned by or paid to our Chief Executive Officer and our two most highly compensated executive officers, other than our Chief Executive Officer, in 2017 whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 (the “named executive officers”).

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($) (1)				Bonus ($)				Stock Awards ($)				Option Awards ($) (2)				Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation				Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings				Other				Total
Sune Mathiesen, Chief Executive Officer (3)
	2017		$	275,559			$	50,868							$	-				-				-			$	24,086	(5)		$	350,513
	2016			216,099												-				-				-				21,268				237,267
	2015			220,992												-				-				-				22,962				243,954
Soren Degn, Chief Financial Officer (4)
	2017			172,913												-				-				-				103,775	(5)			276,688
	2016			216,146												-				-				-				17,440				233,586
	2015			169,801				-				-				96,968				-				-				16,691				283,460

 

(1)	Total salaries for Messrs. Mathiesen and Degn for 2015 are reported on an as-converted basis from Danish Krone (DKK) to U.S. dollars ($) based on the currency exchange rate of $1.00 = DKK 6.8300, as of December 31, 2015. Total salaries for Messrs. Mathiesen and Degn for 2016 are reported on an as-converted basis from Danish Krone (DKK) to U.S. dollars ($) based on the currency exchange rate of $1.00 = DKK 7.0528, as of December 31, 2016. Total salaries for Messrs. Mathiesen and Degn for 2017 are reported on an as-converted basis from Danish Krone (DKK) to U.S. dollars ($) based on the currency exchange rate of $1.00 = DKK 6.2077, as of December 31, 2017. We do not make any representation that the Danish Krone amounts could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars at such rate on December 31, 2015, December 31, 2016 or December 31, 2017, or at any other rate.
(2)	These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value for stock awards granted in fiscal year 2015, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See notes to consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this report for further information on the assumptions used to value stock options. On December 22, 2015, Mr. Degn was granted stock options to purchase 130,000 shares of common stock, at $1.01 per share. The options vested immediately. All of these options will expire on December 21, 2025.

 

 

(3)	Mr. Mathiesen became our Chief Executive Officer in August 2014. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Mathiesen is entitled to an annual base salary of approximately $240,859 based on the currency exchange rate of $1.00 = DKK 6.2277, as of December 31, 2017.

 

(4)	Mr. Degn became our Chief Financial Officer in August 2011. Pursuant to his consultancy agreement, Mr. Degn is entitled to an estimated annual base fee of approximately $185,070 based on the currency exchange rate of $1.00 = DKK 6.2277, as of December 31, 2017.
(5)	Pursuant to Mr. Mathiesen’s employment agreement, Mr. Mathiesen’s received $24,086, $21,268 and $22,962 of contributions from the Company to his individual retirement account in 2017, 2016 and 2015. Pursuant to Mr. Degn’s employment agreement, Mr. Degn received $11,240, $17,440 and $16,691 of contributions from the Company to his individual retirement account in 2017, 2016 and 2015. Mr. Degn received a consultancy fee of $92,535 in 2017 for his service as a CFO of the company.

   

 Employment Arrangements 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we had employment agreements with Messrs. Mathiesen, Degn and Petersen. A description of each agreement is set forth below.

 

Mathiesen Agreement

 

Effective July 30, 2014 the Company’s Board of Directors appointed Mr. Sune Mathiesen to serve as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as a Director of the Company. Mr. Mathiesen was also engaged to serve as a Director of LiqTech Int. DK pursuant to a Director Contract, dated July 15, 2014, by and between Mr. Mathiesen and LiqTech Int. DK (the “Mathiesen Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Mathiesen Agreement, in consideration for his services, Mr. Mathiesen shall receive an annual base salary initially set at DKK 1,500,000 (or approximately $245,042 based on the currency exchange rate of $1 = DKK 6.1214 as of December 31, 2014). Further, he shall receive a yearly bonus of 5% of the average gross profit for LiqTech Int. DK and LiqTech Systems A/S for any sales (revenue) ≥130,000,000 DKK per year (the gross margin is fixed at 40% without depreciations). For example, the calculation will be as follows, if the revenue for LiqTech Int. DK and LiqTech Systems should be DKK 200,000,000 in a year and the gross profit DKK 80,000,000 (40%) the bonus would be the following: 80,000,000 minus 130,000,000 * 0.4 = 52,000,000 DKK = 28,000,000 * 0.05 = DKK 1,400,000. Mr. Mathiesen is entitled to five weeks of vacation, home internet service, a company car, a LiqTech Int. DK mobile phone, a LiqTech Int. DK laptop and reimbursement of LiqTech Int. DK-related travel expenses. LiqTech Int. DK may terminate the Mathiesen Agreement upon not less than twelve months prior notice and Mr. Mathiesen may terminate the Mathiesen Agreement with twelve months prior notice. The Mathiesen Agreement was irredeemable from both parties until December 31, 2016. 

 

Degn Agreement

 

On June 30, 2017, Mr. Degn and the Company agreed to replace Mr. Degn’s previous employment agreement in its entirety with a CFO Service Agreement, whereby Mr. Degn would be entitled to compensation at an average monthly rate of $15,400 until March 31, 2018.

 

Petersen Agreement

 

Effective January 1, 2014, LiqTech International, Inc. and Aldo Petersen entered into a Services Agreement (the “Petersen Agreement”) whereby Mr. Petersen shall provide on-going services to us which shall include, without limitation, participation at road shows, general investor relations services, general work as Chairman of the Board and other services which are mutually agreeable by both parties on an ad hoc basis (collectively, the “Services”) in consideration for annual payments equal to DKK1,235,000 (or approximately $201,751 based on the currency exchange rate of $1 = DKK 6.1214 as of December 31, 2014), payable as follows: (a) DKK205,833.34 representing payment for the Services for the months of January and February, 2014; and (b) DKK102,916.67 on the final business day of each month beginning on March 31, 2014 through the end of the term of this Agreement (i.e. December 31, 2014). Except for the above-mentioned amounts, no amounts, bonus amounts or otherwise, shall be due and payable by us to Mr. Petersen in connection with the Services. We shall, at our sole cost and expense, provide Mr. Peterson with a laptop computer and a mobile telephone, including communication costs. Such items shall be utilized by Mr. Peterson in furtherance of Mr. Peterson’s duties and obligations under the Petersen Agreement. The Petersen Agreement shall continue for an initial period of one year and thereafter, shall be renewed automatically for subsequent one year terms unless otherwise agreed to in writing by both parties or unless otherwise terminated in accordance with the terms of the Petersen Agreement. We may terminate the Petersen Agreement at any time by providing twelve months prior written notice of termination to Mr. Petersen, effective as of the date of delivery of said notice. On October 30, 2017 the Company provided notice that the Services Agreement dated January 1, 2014 by and between the Company and Aldo Petersen, an individual and Chairman of the Board, would no longer remain in effect 12 months from the Effective Date, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement.

 

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Last Fiscal Year End

 

The following table sets forth all outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2017.

 

		Option Awards																				Stock Awards
Name		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Exercisable (#)				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unexercisable (#)				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: No. of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (1)				Option Exercise Price				Option Expiration Date				Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested				Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested				Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
Sune Mathiesen, CEO			-				-				-			$	-				-				-				-				-				-
Soren Degn, CFO			130,000				-				130,000			$	1.01			12/21/25					-				-				-				-

 

(1)

Each option has an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock at the time of grant as reported on the NYSE Mkt on the date of grant.

 

(2)

See footnote 2 to the Summary Compensation Table for the grant date and vesting schedule of each option reflected above.

 

Compensation of Directors

 

For 2017 each non-executive director was entitled to $25,000 for services on the Board of Directors; the Audit Committee Chairman was paid an additional fee of $10,000 per year, the Compensation Committee Chairman was paid an additional fee of $6,000 per year; and each qualifying non-executive director would receive an automatic annual stock grant on January 2 of each year in the amount of $30,000 commencing the first year after full vesting of their initial 100,000 share stock grant that vest over a three year period.

 

The following table provides information regarding compensation that was earned or paid to the individuals who served as non-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2017. Except as set forth in the table, during 2016, directors did not earn nor receive cash compensation or compensation in the form of stock awards, option awards or any other form. 

 

Name		Fees earned or paid in cash (1)($)				Stock Awards (2)($)				Option awards (2)				Non-equity incentive plan compensation				Non-qualified deferred compensation earnings				All other compensation (3)				Total
Aldo Petersen			-				-				-				-				-				232,496			$	232,496
Mark Vernon			31,000				30,000				-				-				-				-			$	61,000
Alexander J. Buehler			12,985				35,000																				47,985
Peyton Boswell			9,653				35,000																				44,653
Paul Burgon			17,500				30,000				-				-				-				-			$	47,500
Mike Barish			12,500				-				-				-				-				-			$	12,500
Rengarajan Ramesh			25,000				-				-				-				-				-			$	25,000

  

 

(1)	Our independent directors are entitled to cash compensation of $25,000 per year, the chairman of our Audit Committee is entitled to $35,000 per year and the chairman of our Compensation Committee is entitled to $31,000.
(2)	These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value for stock awards granted in 2017, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. As such, these amounts do not correspond to the compensation actually realized by each director for the period.
	The Company issued 29,703 shares of restricted stock valued at $30,000 for services provided and to be provided by Mr. Burgon. Mr. Burgon shall provide general work as member of the Board of Directors and other services, which are mutually agreeable by both parties on an ad hoc basis.    The Company issued 29,703 shares of restricted stock valued at $30,000 for services provided and to be provided by Mr. Vernon. Mr. Vernon shall provide general work as member of the Board of Directors and other services, which are mutually agreeable by both parties on an ad hoc basis.    The Company awarded 100,000 restricted shares of Common Stock valued at $35,000 for services to be provided by Mr. Buehler. Mr. Buehler shall provide general work as member of the Board of Directors and other services, which are mutually agreeable by both parties on an ad hoc basis. The restricted shares of Common Stock shall vest as follows: one-third on August 10, 2018, one-third on August 10, 2019, and one-third on August 10, 2020. All shares will vest immediately upon a change of control.   The Company awarded 100,000 restricted shares of Common Stock valued at $35,000 for services to be provided by Mr. Boswell. Mr. Boswell shall provide general work as member of the Board of Directors and other services, which are mutually agreeable by both parties on an ad hoc basis. The restricted shares of Common Stock shall vest as follows: one-third on August 10, 2018, one-third on August 10, 2019, and one-third on August 10, 2020. All shares will vest immediately upon a change of control.
(3)	Mr. Petersen has entered into a Services Agreement whereby Mr. Petersen shall provide on-going services to us including participation at road shows, general investor relations services, general work as Chairman of the Board of Directors and other services, which are mutually agreeable by both parties on an ad hoc basis. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” for a description of the Services Agreement. On October 30, 2017 the Company provided notice that the Services Agreement dated January 1, 2014 by and between the Company and Aldo Petersen, an individual and Chairman of the Board, would no longer remain in effect 12 months from the Effective Date, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement.

 

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

The following table sets forth, as of March 23, 2018, certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock, the only class of capital stock we have currently outstanding, of (i) each director and “named executive officers”  (as defined in the section titled “Executive Compensation — Summary Compensation Table”) individually, (ii) our Chief Financial officer, (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group, and (iv) each person known to us who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock. In accordance with the rules of the SEC, “beneficial ownership” includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. To our knowledge, except as indicated in the footnotes to this table and pursuant to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by them. 

 

Name of Beneficial Owner(1)		Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (2)				Percentage of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (3)
Directors and NEOs
Sune Mathiesen(4)			1,358,261				3.1	%
Aldo Petersen			3,188,541				7.2	%
Soren Degn(5)			298,000				*
Mark Vernon (7)			629,164				1.4	%
Alexander J. Buehler			-				*
Peyton Boswell			-				*
All executive officers and directors as a group (7 persons)(6)			5,473,966				12.2	%
5% Shareholders:
Norman H. Pessin (8)			8,180,842				18.0	%
Sandra F. Pessin (8)			8,180,842				18.0	%
Brian Pessin (8)			8,180,842				18.0	%

 

*	Less than one percent.

   

 

(1)

Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each person listed above is: c/o LiqTech International A/S, Industriparken 22C 12, DK-2750 Ballerup, Denmark.

 

(2)

Under the rules and regulations of the SEC, beneficial ownership includes (i) shares actually owned, (ii) shares underlying preferred stock, options and warrants that are currently exercisable and (iii) shares underlying options and warrants that are exercisable within 60 days of March 23, 2018. All shares beneficially owned by a particular person under clauses (ii) and (iii) of the previous sentence are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person but are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

 

(3)

Based on 44,229,264 shares issued and outstanding as of March 23, 2018.

 

(4)

All of these shares are owned by Masu A/S, a Danish entity. Mr. Mathiesen controls the voting and disposition of the shares owned by Masu A/S

 

(5)

Includes 118,000 shares and 50,000 shares owned by LD Consulting ApS and LHD Invest ApS, respectively, each of which is a Danish entity. The voting and disposition of the shares owned by LD Consulting ApS and LHD Invest ApS are controlled by Mr. Degn. Includes 130,000 shares underlie a 10-year option immediately exercisable at an exercise price of $1.01 per share with expiration date December 11, 2025.

 

(6)

Includes 130,000 shares underlie a 10-year option immediately exercisable at an exercise price of $1.01 per share.

 

(7)

Includes 83,334 preferred shares. The Convertible Preferred shares, which will automatically convert into common shares no later than May 14, 2018 (1 to 4 conversion rate).

 

(8)

Includes 1,302,006 shares owned by Norman H. Pessin, 3,510,869 shares and 208,333 preferred shares owned by Sandra F. Pessin and 2,034,635 shares and 125,000 preferred shares owned by Brian Pessin. The Convertible Preferred shares, which will automatically convert into common shares no later than May 14, 2018 (1 to 4 conversion rate).

 

We know of no arrangements, including pledges, by or among any of the forgoing persons, the operation of which could result in a change of control of us. 

  

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

Transactions with Related Persons

 

The following discussion relates to types of transactions involving our company and any of our executive officers, directors, director nominees or five percent stockholders, each of whom we refer to as a "related party." For purposes of this discussion, a "related-party transaction" is a transaction, arrangement or relationship:

 

•     in which we participate;

 

•     that involves an amount in excess of the lesser of $120,000 or 1% of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years; and

 

•     in which a related party has a direct or indirect material interest.

 

From January 1, 2016 through the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, there have been no related-party transactions, except for the executive officer and director compensation arrangements described in the section "Executive Compensation" and as described below.

 

On or about May 12, 2017, Sandra F. Pessin and Brian Pessin entered into subscription agreements with the Company for 2,000,000 and 1,000,000 shares of common stock, respectively, of at a price of $0.25 per share for a total consideration of $750,000.

 

On June 30, 2017, Mr. Degn and the Company entered into a CFO Service Agreement, whereby Mr. Degn would be entitled to compensation at an average monthly rate of $15,400 until March 31, 2018.

 

On or about November 22, 2017, Sandra F. Pessin and Brian Pessin entered into subscription agreements with the Company for 208,333 and 125,000 share of preferred stock, respectively, at a price of $1.20 per share for a total consideration of $358,333.

 

 

Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions

 

Any request for us to enter into a transaction with an executive officer, director, principal stockholder, or any of such persons’ immediate family members or affiliates, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000, or 1% of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years, must first be presented to our audit committee for review, consideration and approval. All of our directors, executive officers and employees will be required to report to our audit committee any such related party transaction. In approving or rejecting the proposed agreement, our audit committee will consider the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant to the audit committee, including, but not limited to, the risks, costs and benefits to us, the terms of the transaction, the availability of other sources for comparable services or products, and, if applicable, the impact on a director’s independence. Our audit committee will approve only those agreements that, in light of known circumstances, are in, or are not inconsistent with, our best interests, as our audit committee determines in the good faith exercise of its discretion.

 

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

Audit and Audit-Related Fees

 

The aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed by our independent auditors for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, and 2016 and for the review of our quarterly financial statements. During 2017 and 2016 audit fees were $148,894 and $151,689. Our auditors did not provide any tax compliance, planning services or audit related services for the Company. Our auditors did not provide any other services than those described above. 

 

Audit Committee Pre-approval

 

The policy of the Audit Committee is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent accountants. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax fees, and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services. The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to certain committee members when expedition of services is necessary. The independent accountants and management are required to periodically report to the full Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent accountants in accordance with this pre-approval delegation, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee approved all of the services described above in this Item 14 in advance during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. 

  

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)        Financial Statements and Schedules

 

The financial statements are set forth under Item 8 of this Annual Report. The following financial statement schedule for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

 

Schedules other than that listed above are omitted because the conditions requiring their filing do not exist or because the required information is provided in the Consolidated Financial Statements, including the Notes thereto. Financial statement schedules have been omitted since they are either not required, not applicable, or the information is otherwise included.

 

 

(b)           Exhibits

 

 

Exhibit No.		Description		Location
3.1		Articles of Incorporation		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (SEC Accession No. 0001078782-09-001287) as filed with the SEC on August 19, 2009
3.2		Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Information Statement on Schedule 14C as filed with the SEC on September 20, 2011
3.3		Amended and Restated Bylaws		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC on May 15, 2012
4.1		Form of Common Stock Certificate		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on March 29, 2012
4.2		Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of LiqTech International, Inc.		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC on November 14, 2017

 

10.1		Lease Agreements for 1800 - 1810 Buerkle Road, White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A as filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011
10.2		Lease Agreement for 1800 - 1816 Buerkle Road, White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on March 29, 2012
10.3		Lease Agreement for Grusbakken 12, DK-2820 Gentofte Denmark		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A as filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011 (translated in English)
10.4		Lease Agreement for Industriparken 22C, 2750 Ballerup, Denmark		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A as filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011 (translated in English)

 

10.5		Services Agreement, dated effective January 1, 2014, by and between LiqTech International, Inc. and Aldo Petersen		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on March 27, 2014
10.6		Director Contract, dated July 29, 2014, by and between LiqTech International A/S and Sune Mathiesen		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on August 1, 2014
10.7		Form of Underwriter’s Warrant (Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC)		Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on July 23, 2014
10.8		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 21, 2015 by and between LiqTech International, Inc. and Søren Degn		Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on December 23, 2015

 

 

10.9		Form of Subscription Agreement		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC on May 15, 2017
10.10		Form of Subscription Agreement (U.S. Investors)		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on November 20, 2017
10.11		Form of Subscription Agreement (Non-U.S. Investors)		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on November 20, 2017

 

21		List of Subsidiaries		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on March 30, 2017
31.1		Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002		Filed herewith
31.2		Certifications of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002		Filed herewith
32.1		Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002		Furnished herewith
32.2		Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002		Furnished herewith

 

101. INS		XBRL Instance Document		Provided herewith
101. CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Link base Document		Provided herewith
101. DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Link base Document		Provided herewith
101. LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Label Link base Document		Provided herewith
101. PRE		XBRL Extension Presentation Link base Document		Provided herewith
101. SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Scheme Document		Provided herewith

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

	LIQTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Date: March 23, 2018
	By:	/s/ Sune Mathiesen
		Sune Mathiesen  Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and Director

 

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on the dates indicated.

 

 

Signatures		Title		Date
/s/ Sune Mathiesen		Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and Director		March 23, 2018
Sune Mathiesen
/s/ Aldo Petersen		Chairman of the Board of Directors		March 23, 2018
Aldo Petersen
/s/ Soren Degn		Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer		March 23, 2018
Soren Degn
/s/ Alexander J. Buehler		Director		March 23, 2018
Alexander J. Buehler
/s/ Mark Vernon		Director		March 23, 2018
Mark Vernon
/s/ Peyton Boswell		Director		March 23, 2018
Peyton Boswell

 

43