---



UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549



FORM 10-K









Commission File No. 1-6314



Tutor Perini Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)













Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:





Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  ☑  No  ☐



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐  No  ☑



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ☑  No  ☐



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  ☑  No  ☐



Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☑



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act  ☐



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  ☐  No ☑



The aggregate market value of voting Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $1,116,725,095 as of June 30, 2017, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.



The number of shares of Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share, outstanding at February 21, 2018 was 49,791,010.



Documents Incorporated by Reference



Portions of the definitive proxy statement relating to the registrant’s annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

---

 











TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION



2017 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K



TABLE OF CONTENTS







 

---

 

PART I.



Forward-Looking Statements



The statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), including without limitation, statements regarding our management’s expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future and statements regarding future guidance or estimates and non-historical performance. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on us. Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith, and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties are listed and discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors, below. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.



ITEM 1. BUSINESS



General



Tutor Perini Corporation, formerly known as Perini Corporation, was incorporated in 1918 as a successor to businesses that had been engaged in providing construction services since 1894. Tutor Perini Corporation (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “Tutor Perini,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our,” unless the context indicates otherwise) is a leading construction company, based on revenue as ranked by Engineering News-Record (“ENR”), offering diversified general contracting, construction management and design-build services to private customers and public agencies throughout the world. Our corporate headquarters are in Los Angeles (Sylmar), California, and we have various other principal offices throughout the United States and its territories (see Item 2. Properties for a listing of our major facilities). Our common stock (“Common Stock”) is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TPC.” We are incorporated in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.



We have established a strong reputation within our markets for executing large, complex projects on time and within budget while adhering to strict quality control measures. We offer general contracting, pre-construction planning and comprehensive project management services, including the planning and scheduling of the manpower, equipment, materials and subcontractors required for a project. We also offer self-performed construction services including site work; concrete forming and placement; steel erection; electrical; mechanical; plumbing; heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC); and fire protection. During 2017, we performed work on approximately 1,500 construction projects.



In 2017, ENR ranked Tutor Perini as the ninth largest domestic contractor. We are recognized as one of the leading civil contractors in the United States, as evidenced by our past and current performance on several of the country’s largest mass-transit and transportation projects, such as the East Side Access project in New York City, the California High-Speed Rail System, the Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement (SR 99) project in Seattle, McCarran International Airport Terminal 3 in Las Vegas, major portions of the Red Line and Purple Line segments of the Los Angeles subway system, and the San Francisco Central Subway extension to Chinatown. We are also recognized as one of the leading building contractors in the United States, as evidenced by our performance on several of the country’s largest building development projects, including CityCenter and the Cosmopolitan in Las Vegas and Hudson Yards in New York City.



Since the 2008 merger between our predecessor companies, Tutor-Saliba Corporation (“Tutor-Saliba”) and Perini Corporation, we have experienced significant growth supported by our increased size, scale, bonding capacity, access to broader geographic regions, expanded management capabilities, complementary assets and particular expertise in large, complex projects. In 2010 and 2011, we expanded vertically and geographically through the strategic acquisitions of seven companies with demonstrated success in their respective markets. These acquisitions further strengthened our geographic presence in our Building and Civil segments and also significantly increased our specialty contracting capabilities. In 2011, we completed an internal reorganization of our reporting segments with the creation of the Specialty Contractors segment, which we describe below.



Our acquisitions have enabled us to provide customers with a vertically integrated service offering. This vertical integration is a unique capability and competitive advantage that allows us to self-perform a greater amount of work than our competitors. Our vertical integration increases our competitiveness in bidding and our efficiency in managing and executing large, complex projects. It also provides us with significant cross-selling opportunities across a broad geographic footprint.



---

 

Business Segment Overview



Our business is conducted through three segments: Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors.



Civil Segment



Our Civil segment specializes in public works construction and the replacement and reconstruction of infrastructure across most of the major geographic regions of the United States. Our civil contracting services include construction and rehabilitation of highways, bridges, tunnels, mass-transit systems, and water management and wastewater treatment facilities.



The Civil segment is comprised of the Company’s legacy heavy civil construction operations (civil operations of our predecessors, Tutor-Saliba, its subsidiary Black Construction, and Perini Corporation), as well as Frontier-Kemper, Lunda Construction and Becho. The Company’s legacy heavy civil units operate primarily on the West Coast and East Coast of the United States and are engaged in a variety of large mass-transit, transportation, bridge and highway projects. Frontier-Kemper is a heavy civil contractor engaged in the construction of tunnels for highways, railroads, subways and rapid transit systems; the construction of shafts and other facilities for water supply, wastewater transport and hydroelectric projects; and the development and equipping of mines with innovative hoisting, elevator and vertical conveyance systems. Lunda Construction is a heavy civil contractor specializing in the construction, rehabilitation and maintenance of bridges, railroads and other civil structures throughout the United States. Becho is engaged in drilling, foundation and excavation support for shoring, bridges, piers, roads and highway projects, primarily in the southwestern United States. We believe that the Company has benefitted from these acquisitions by an expanded geographic presence, enhanced civil construction capabilities and the addition of experienced management with proven, successful track records.



Our Civil segment’s customers primarily award contracts through one of two methods: the traditional public “competitive bid” method, in which price is the major determining factor, or through a request for proposal, where contracts are awarded based on a combination of technical qualifications, proposed project team, schedule, past performance on similar projects and price.



Traditionally, our Civil segment’s customers require each contractor to pre-qualify for construction business by meeting criteria that include technical capabilities and financial strength. Our financial strength and outstanding record of performance on challenging civil works projects often enable us to pre-qualify for projects in situations where smaller, less diversified contractors are unable to meet the qualification requirements. We believe this is a competitive advantage that makes us an attractive partner on the largest, most complex infrastructure projects and prestigious design-build, or DBOM (design-build-operate-maintain) or P3 (public-private partnership) projects.



In its 2017 rankings, ENR ranked us as the nation’s third largest domestic heavy contractor and fourth largest contractor in the transportation market.



We believe the Civil segment provides us with significant opportunities for growth due to the age and condition of existing infrastructure coupled with large government funding sources aimed at the replacement and reconstruction of aging U.S. infrastructure and popular, often bipartisan, support from the public and elected officials for infrastructure improvement programs. Funding for major civil infrastructure projects is typically provided through a combination of one or more of the following: local, regional, state and federal loans; grants; other direct allocations sourced through tax revenue; bonds; user fees; and, for certain projects, private capital.



We have been active in civil construction since 1894 and believe we have a particular expertise in large, complex civil construction projects. We have completed or are currently working on some of the most significant civil construction projects in the United States. For example, we are currently working on various portions of the East Side Access project in New York City, the first phase of the California High-Speed Rail project, the Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement (SR 99) project in Seattle, the Purple Line Segment 2 expansion project in Los Angeles, the San Francisco Central Subway extension to Chinatown, the platform over the eastern rail yard and the Amtrak tunnel at Hudson Yards in New York City, and the rehabilitation of the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge in New York. We have also completed projects at the John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York, the Los Angeles International Airport, the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, the New Irvington Tunnel in Fremont, California, the Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore project near Oakland, California and express toll lanes along I-95 in Maryland.



Building Segment



Our Building segment has significant experience providing services to a number of specialized building markets for private and public works customers, including hospitality and gaming, transportation, health care, commercial offices, government facilities, sports and entertainment, education, correctional facilities, biotech, pharmaceutical, industrial and high-tech. We believe the success of the Building segment results from our proven ability to manage and perform large, complex projects with aggressive fast-track schedules; elaborate designs; and advanced mechanical, electrical and life safety systems, while providing accurate budgeting and strict quality

---

 

control. Although price is a key competitive factor, we believe our strong reputation, long-standing customer relationships and significant level of repeat and referral business have enabled us to achieve a leading position in the marketplace.



The Building segment is comprised of several operating units that provide general contracting, design-build, preconstruction and construction services in various regions of the United States. Tutor Perini Building Corp. focuses on large, complex building projects nationwide, including significant projects in the hospitality and gaming, commercial office, education, government facilities, and multi-unit residential markets. Rudolph and Sletten focuses on large, complex projects in California in the health care, commercial office, technology, industrial, education, and government facilities markets. Roy Anderson Corp. provides its services, including disaster rapid response services, to public and private customers primarily throughout the southeastern United States. Perini Management Services provides diversified construction and design-build services internationally to U.S. government agencies, as well as to surety companies and multi-national corporations. We believe that our expertise and strong résumé of notable projects positions us well to win additional large, complex building projects.



In its 2017 rankings, ENR ranked us as the ninth largest domestic building contractor. We are a recognized leader in the hospitality and gaming market, specializing in the construction of high-end resorts and casinos. We work with hotel operators, Native American tribal councils, developers and architectural firms to provide diversified construction services to meet the challenges of new construction and renovation of hotel and resort properties. We believe that our reputation for completing projects on time is a significant competitive advantage in this market, as any delay in project completion could result in significant loss of revenue for the customer.



We have recently completed, or are currently working on, large private and public building projects across a wide array of building end markets, including commercial offices, multi-unit residential, health care, hospitality and gaming, transportation, education, and entertainment. Specific projects include a large corporate office building in northern California for a confidential technology customer; Tower C (commercial) and Tower D (multi-unit residential) at Hudson Yards in New York City; the Washington Hospital expansion in Fremont, California; the Graton Rancheria Resort and Casino in Rohnert Park, California; the Pechanga Resort and Casino expansion in Temecula, California; the Maryland Live! Casino expansion in Hanover, Maryland; the Broadway Plaza retail development in Walnut Creek, California; Kaiser Hospital Buildings in San Leandro and Redwood City, California; and courthouses in San Bernardino and San Diego, California and Broward County, Florida. As a result of our reputation and track record, we were previously awarded and completed contracts for several marquee projects in the hospitality and gaming market, including the Resorts World New York Casino in Jamaica, New York, as well as CityCenter, the Cosmopolitan, the Wynn Encore Hotel, Trump International Hotel and Tower, Paris Las Vegas and Planet Hollywood in Las Vegas. The above projects span a wide array of building end markets and illustrate our Building segment’s résumé of successfully completed large-scale public and private projects.



Specialty Contractors Segment



Our Specialty Contractors segment specializes in electrical, mechanical, plumbing, HVAC, fire protection systems and pneumatically placed concrete for a full range of civil and building construction projects in the industrial, commercial, hospitality and gaming, and mass-transit end markets. This segment provides unique strengths and capabilities that position us as a full-service contractor with greater control over project bids and costs, scheduled work, project delivery and risk management.



The Specialty Contractors segment is comprised of several operating units that provide unique services in various regions of the United States. Five Star Electric has established itself as an industry leader and is one of the largest electrical contractors in New York City. Five Star Electric provides construction services in the electrical sector, including power, lighting, fire alarm, security, telecommunications, low voltage and wireless systems to both the public and private sectors. These services are provided across end markets that include multi-unit residential, hotels, commercial offices, industrial, mass transit, education, retail, sports and entertainment, health care and water treatment. Fisk Electric covers many of the major commercial, transportation and industrial electrical construction markets in California and the southern United States, with the ability to cover other attractive markets nationwide. Fisk’s expertise is in technology design and the development of electrical and technology systems for major projects spanning a broad variety of project types, including commercial office buildings, sports arenas, hospitals, research laboratories, hotels and casinos, convention centers, manufacturing plants, refineries, and water and wastewater treatment facilities. WDF, Nagelbush and Desert Mechanical each provide mechanical, plumbing, HVAC and fire protection services to a range of customers in a wide variety of markets, including transportation, commercial/industrial, schools and universities and residential. WDF is one of the largest mechanical contractors servicing the New York City metropolitan region. Nagelbush operates primarily in Florida and Desert Mechanical operates primarily in the western United States. Superior Gunite specializes in pneumatically placed structural concrete utilized in infrastructure projects nationwide, such as bridges, dams, tunnels and retaining walls.



In its 2017 rankings, ENR ranked us as the fifth largest electrical contractor1, twelfth largest mechanical contractor1 and tenth largest specialty contractor1 in the United States. Through Five Star Electric and WDF, collectively, we are also the largest specialty contractor in the New York City metropolitan area.



1 This ranking represents the collective revenue of the Company’s specialty contracting subsidiaries as reported to ENR.



---

 

Our Specialty Contractors units have recently completed, or are currently working on, various portions of the East Side Access project in New York City, various projects at the World Trade Center and at Hudson Yards in New York City, two signal system modernization projects in New York City and electrical work for the new hospital at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. This Specialty Contractors segment has also supported, or is currently supporting, several large projects in our Civil and Building segments, including the Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement (SR 99) project in Seattle; McCarran International Airport Terminal 3 in Las Vegas; the Resorts World New York Casino in Jamaica, New York; the Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore project near Oakland, California; and several marquee projects in the hospitality and gaming market, including CityCenter, the Cosmopolitan, the Wynn Encore Hotel, Trump International Hotel and Tower, and Planet Hollywood in Las Vegas.



The majority of work performed by the Specialty Contractors segment is contracted directly with state and local municipal agencies, real estate developers, general contractors, school districts and commercial and industrial customers. A smaller, but growing,  component of its work is performed for our Civil and Building segments.



Markets and Customers



We provide diversified construction services to a variety of end markets and customers. The following tables set forth certain reportable segment information relating to the Company’s operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

























---

 











State and Local Agencies. Our state and local government customers include state transportation departments, metropolitan authorities, cities, municipal agencies, school districts and public universities. We provide services to our state and local customers primarily pursuant to contracts awarded through competitive bidding processes. Our building construction services for state and local government customers have included judicial and correctional facilities, schools and dormitories, health care facilities, convention centers, parking structures and other municipal buildings. The vast majority of our civil contracting and building construction services are provided in locations throughout the United States and its territories.



Private Owners. Our private customers include real estate developers, health care companies, technology companies, hospitality and gaming resort owners, Native American sovereign nations, public corporations and private universities. We provide services to our private customers through negotiated contract arrangements, as well as through competitive bids.



Federal Agencies. Our federal government customers include the U.S. State Department, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Air Force and the National Park Service. We provide services to federal agencies primarily pursuant to contracts for specific or multi-year assignments that involve new construction or infrastructure repairs or improvements. A portion of our revenue from federal agencies is derived from projects in overseas locations, which we expect to continue for the foreseeable future as a result of our experience and strong relationships with federal agencies, together with anticipated expenditures for defense, diplomatic and security-related construction work.



Most federal, state and local government contracts contain provisions that permit the termination of contracts, in whole or in part, for the convenience of the government, among other reasons.



For additional information on revenue and total assets by geographic location, see Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



---

 

Backlog



Backlog in our industry is a measure of the total value of work that is remaining to be performed on projects that have been awarded. We include a construction project in our backlog when a contract is awarded or when we have otherwise received written definitive notice that the project has been awarded to us and there are no remaining major uncertainties that the project will proceed (e.g., we believe adequate funding is in place). As a result, we believe our backlog is firm, and although cancellations or scope adjustments may occur, historically they have not been material. Our backlog by segment, end market and customer type is presented in the following tables:





We estimate that approximately $3.6 billion, or 49%, of our backlog as of December 31, 2017 will be recognized as revenue in 2018.



























---

 



Types of Contracts



The contracting and management services we provide consist of planning and scheduling the manpower, equipment, materials and subcontractors required for the timely completion of a project in accordance with the terms, plans and specifications contained in a construction contract. We provide these services by entering into traditional contracting arrangements as follows:



Fixed price contracts account for a substantial portion of our revenue and are expected to continue to represent a sizeable percentage of both total revenue and backlog. The composition of revenue and backlog by type of contract for 2017, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:



















---

 

Competition



While the construction markets include numerous competitors, especially for small to mid-sized projects, much of the work that we target is for larger, more complex projects where, typically, there are fewer active market participants due to the greater capabilities and resources required to perform the work. Despite this, over the past several years we have seen increased competition, particularly from foreign competitors that have been pursuing major projects in the United States due to the relatively larger size and significant number of U.S. opportunities. We anticipate that the increased level of foreign competition will persist for the foreseeable future.



In our Civil segment, we compete principally with large civil construction firms, including (alphabetically) Dragados USA; Fluor Corporation; Granite Construction; Kiewit Corporation; Skanska USA; Traylor Bros., Inc.; and The Walsh Group. In our Building segment, we compete with a variety of national and regional contractors. Our primary competitors are (alphabetically) AECOM (through its acquisitions of Tishman Construction and Hunt Construction Group); Balfour Beatty Construction; Clark Construction Group; DPR Construction; Gilbane, Inc.; Hensel Phelps Construction Co.; McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.; Skanska USA; Suffolk Construction; and Turner Construction Company. In our Specialty Contractors segment, we compete principally with various regional and local electrical, mechanical and plumbing subcontractors. We believe price, experience, reputation, responsiveness, customer relationships, project completion track record, schedule control, risk management and quality of work are key factors customers consider when awarding contracts.



Construction Costs



If prices for materials, labor or equipment increase excessively, provisions in certain types of contracts often shift all or a major portion of any adverse impact to the customer. In our fixed price contracts, we attempt to insulate ourselves from the unfavorable effects of inflation, when possible, by incorporating escalating wage and price assumptions into our construction cost estimates, by obtaining firm fixed price quotes from major subcontractors and material suppliers, and by entering into purchase commitments for materials early in the project schedule. Construction and other materials used in our construction activities are generally available locally from multiple sources and have been in adequate supply during recent years. Labor resources for our domestic projects are largely obtained through various labor unions. We have not experienced significant labor shortages in recent years, nor do we expect to in the near future, though a significant, rapid growth in our backlog may lead to situations in which labor resources become constrained. We employ expatriate and local labor in selected overseas areas.



Environmental Matters



Our properties and operations are subject to federal, state and municipal laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including requirements for water discharges; air emissions; the use, management and disposal of solid or hazardous materials or wastes; and the cleanup of contamination. In certain circumstances, we may also be required to hire subcontractors to dispose of hazardous materials encountered on a project in accordance with a plan approved in advance by the owner. We continually evaluate our compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations, and believe that we are in substantial compliance with those laws and regulations. However, future requirements or amendments to current laws or regulations imposing more stringent requirements could require us to incur additional costs to maintain or achieve compliance.



In addition, some environmental laws, such as the U.S. federal “Superfund” law and similar state statutes, can impose liability for the entire cost of cleanup of contaminated sites upon any of the current or former owners or operators or upon parties who generated waste at, or sent waste to, these sites, regardless of who owned the site at the time of the release or the lawfulness of the original disposal activity. Contaminants have been detected at some of the sites that we own and where we have worked as a contractor in the past, and we have incurred costs for the investigation and remediation of hazardous substances. We believe that our liabilities for these sites are not material, either individually or in the aggregate. We have pollution liability insurance coverage for such matters, and if applicable, we seek indemnification from customers to cover the risks associated with environmental remediation.



Insurance and Bonding



All of our properties and equipment, as well as those of our joint ventures, are covered by insurance in amounts that we believe are consistent with our risk of loss and industry practice. Our wholly owned subsidiary, PCR Insurance Company, issues policies for subcontractor default insurance, auto liability, general liability and workers’ compensation insurance, allowing us to centralize our claims and risk management functions to reduce our insurance-related costs.



As a normal part of the construction business, we are often required to provide various types of surety bonds as an additional level of security of our performance. We also require many of our higher-risk subcontractors to provide surety bonds as security for payment of subcontractors and suppliers and to guarantee their performance. As an alternative to traditional surety bonds, we also have purchased subcontractor default insurance for certain construction projects to insure against the risk of subcontractor default.



---

 

Employees



The number of our employees varies based on the number of active projects, the type and magnitude of those projects, as well as our position within the lifecycle of those projects. Our total number of employees as of December 31, 2017 was 10,061.



We are signatory to numerous local and regional collective bargaining agreements, both directly and through trade associations, as a union contractor. These agreements cover all necessary union crafts and are subject to various renewal dates. Estimated amounts for wage escalation related to the expiration of union contracts are included in our bids on various projects; accordingly, the expiration of any union contract in the next year is not expected to have any material impact on us. During the past several years, we have not experienced any significant work stoppages caused by our union employees.



Financial information about geographic areas is discussed in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under the heading “Geographic Information.”



Available Information



Our website address is www.tutorperini.com. In the “Investor Relations” portion of our website, under “Financial Reports,” subsection “SEC Filings,” you may obtain free electronic copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10‑Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports, as well as reports under Section 16 of the Exchange Act of transactions in our stock by our directors and executive officers. These reports are made available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These reports, and any amendments to them, are also available at the Internet website of the SEC, www.sec.gov. The public may also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. In order to obtain information about the operation of the Public Reference Room, you may call 1-800-732-0330. We also maintain various documents, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of the Committees of our Board of Directors in the “Corporate Governance” portion of our website.

  

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS



We are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Set forth below, and elsewhere in this report, are descriptions of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.



If we are unable to accurately estimate contract risks, revenue or costs, the timing of new awards, or the pace of project execution, we may incur a loss or achieve lower than anticipated profit.



Accounting for contract-related revenue and costs requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that may change significantly throughout the project lifecycle, which could result in a material impact to our consolidated financial statements. In addition, cost overruns on fixed price and GMP contracts may result in lower profits or losses. Our results of operations can also fluctuate quarterly and annually depending on when new awards occur and the commencement and progress of work on projects already awarded.



Our contracts require us to perform extra, or change order, work, which can result in disputes or claims and adversely affect our working capital, profits and cash flows.



Our contracts generally require us to perform extra, or change order, work as directed by the customer even if the customer has not agreed in advance on the scope and/or price of the work to be performed. This process may result in disputes or claims over whether the work performed is beyond the scope of work directed by the customer and/or exceeds the price the customer is willing to pay for the work performed. To the extent we do not recover our costs for this work or there are delays in the recovery of these costs, our cash flows and working capital could be adversely impacted.



We are subject to significant legal proceedings which, if determined adversely to us, could harm our reputation, preclude us from bidding on future projects and/or have a material effect on us. We also may invest significant working capital on projects while legal proceedings are being settled.



We are involved in various lawsuits, including the legal proceedings described under Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Litigation is inherently uncertain, and it is not possible to accurately predict what the final outcome will be of any legal proceeding. We must make certain assumptions and rely on estimates, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, regarding potential outcomes of legal proceedings in order to determine an appropriate contingent liability and charge to income. Any result that is materially different than our estimates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of

---

 

operations and cash flows. In addition, any adverse judgments could harm our reputation and preclude us from bidding on future projects.



We occasionally bring claims against project owners for additional cost exceeding the contract price or for amounts not included in the original contract price. When these types of events occur and unresolved claims are pending, we may invest significant working capital in projects to cover cost overruns pending the resolution of the relevant claims. A failure to promptly recover on these types of claims could have a material effect on our liquidity and financial results.



A significant slowdown or decline in economic conditions could adversely affect our operations.



Any significant decline in economic conditions in any of the markets we serve or uncertainty regarding the economic outlook, could result in a decline in demand for infrastructure projects and commercial building developments. In addition, any instability in the financial and credit markets could negatively impact our customers’ ability to pay us on a timely basis, or at all, for work on projects already under construction, could cause our customers to delay or cancel construction projects in our backlog or could create difficulties for customers to obtain adequate financing to fund new construction projects. Such consequences could have an adverse impact on our future operating results. Lastly, we are more susceptible to adverse economic conditions in New York and California, as a significant portion of our operations are concentrated in those states.



Competition for new project awards is intense, and our failure to compete effectively could reduce our market share and profits.



New project awards are determined through either a competitive bid basis or on a negotiated basis. Projects may be awarded based solely upon price, but often take into account other factors, such as technical qualifications, proposed project team, schedule and past performance on similar projects. Within our industry, we compete with many international, regional and local construction firms. Some of these competitors have achieved greater market penetration than we have in the markets in which we compete, and some have greater resources than we do. If we are unable to compete successfully in such markets, our relative market share and profits could be reduced.



We may not fully realize the revenue value reported in our backlog due to cancellations or reductions in scope.



As of December 31, 2017, our backlog of uncompleted construction work was approximately $7.3 billion. The revenue projected in our backlog may not be realized or, if realized, may not result in profits. For example, the cancellation or reduction in scope of certain projects in our backlog could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.



Our actual results could differ from the assumptions and estimates used to prepare our financial statements.



In preparing our financial statements, we are required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) to make estimates and assumptions as of the date of the financial statements. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported values of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Areas requiring significant estimates by our management include, but are not limited to:



• recognition of contract revenue, costs, profits or losses in applying the principles of percentage-of-completion accounting;

• recognition of revenue related to project incentives or awards we expect to receive;

• recognition of recoveries under contract change orders or claims;

• estimated amounts for expected project losses, warranty costs, contract close-out or other costs;

• collectability of billed and unbilled accounts receivable;

• asset valuations;

• income tax provisions and related valuation allowances;

• determination of expense and potential liabilities under pension and other post-retirement benefit programs; and

• accruals for other estimated liabilities, including litigation and insurance revenue/reserves.



Our actual business and financial results could differ from our estimates of such results, which could have a material negative impact on our financial condition and reported results of operations.



The construction services industry is highly schedule driven, and our failure to meet the schedule requirements of our contracts could adversely affect our reputation and/or expose us to financial liability.



Many of our contracts are subject to specific completion schedule requirements. Any failure to meet contractual schedule requirements could subject us to liquidated damages, liability for our customer’s actual cost arising out of our delay and damage to our reputation.



---

 

The level of federal, state and local government spending for infrastructure and other public projects could adversely affect the number of projects available to us in the future.



The civil construction and public-works building markets are dependent on the amount of work funded by various government agencies, which depends on many factors, including the condition of the existing infrastructure and buildings; the need for new or expanded infrastructure and buildings; and federal, state and local government spending levels. As a result, our future operating results could be negatively impacted by any decrease in demand for public projects or decrease or delay in government funding, which could result from a variety of factors, including delays in the sale of voter-approved bonds, budget shortfalls, credit rating downgrades or long-term impairment in the ability of state and local governments to raise capital in the municipal bond market.



Our participation in construction joint ventures exposes us to liability and/or harm to our reputation for failures by our partners.



As part of our business, we enter into joint venture arrangements typically to jointly bid on and execute particular projects, thereby reducing our risk profile while enhancing the execution capability and financial reward of project teams. Success on these joint projects depends in large part on whether our joint venture partners satisfy their contractual obligations. Generally, we and our joint venture partners are jointly and severally liable for all liabilities and obligations of our joint ventures. If a joint venture partner fails to perform or is financially unable to bear its portion of required capital contributions or other obligations, including liabilities stemming from lawsuits, we could be required to make additional investments, provide additional services or pay more than our proportionate share of a liability to make up for our partner’s shortfall. Further, if we are unable to adequately address our partner’s performance issues, the customer may terminate the project, which could result in legal liability to us, harm our reputation, reduce our profit on a project or, in some cases, result in a loss.



We require substantial personnel, including construction and project managers and specialty subcontractor resources to execute and perform our contracts in backlog. The successful execution of our business strategies is also dependent upon our ability to attract and retain our key officers, as well as adequately plan for their succession.



Our ability to execute and perform on our contracts in backlog depends in large part upon our ability to hire and retain highly skilled personnel, including project and construction management and trade labor resources, such as carpenters, masons and other skilled workers. In the event we are unable to attract, hire and retain the requisite personnel and subcontractors necessary to execute and perform our backlog, we may experience delays in completing projects in accordance with project schedules or an increase in expected costs, both of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results, our reputation and our relationships. In addition, if we lack the personnel and specialty subcontractors necessary to perform on our current contract backlog, we may find it necessary to curtail our pursuit of new projects. A significant, rapid growth in our backlog may lead to situations in which labor resources become constrained.



The execution of our business strategies also substantially depends on our ability to retain several key members of our management. Losing any of these individuals could adversely affect our business. The majority of these key officers are not bound by employment agreements. Volatility or lack of positive performance in our stock price may adversely affect our ability to retain key staff to whom we have provided share-based compensation. Additionally, because a substantial portion of our key executives' compensation is placed "at risk" and linked to the performance of our business, when our operating results are negatively impacted, we are at greater risk of employee turnover. If we lose our key executives and do not have qualified successors in place, our operating results would likely be harmed.



Systems and information technology interruption and breaches in data security could adversely impact our ability to operate and negatively impact our operating results.



We are reliant on computer and other information technology that could be interrupted or damaged by a variety of factors including, but not limited to, cyber-attacks, natural disasters, power loss, telecommunications failures, acts of war, computer viruses and physical damage. The resulting consequences could include a loss of critical data, a delay in operations or an unintentional disclosure of confidential information, any of which could have a material impact to our Company and its consolidated financial statements.



We dedicate considerable attention and resources to the safeguarding of our information technology systems. Our systems may, nevertheless, continue to be at risk for cyber-attacks. Consequently, we may need to engage significant resources in the future to remediate the impact of, or further mitigate the risk of, such an attack. Any successful cyber-attack could result in the criminal, or otherwise illegitimate use of, confidential data, including the Company’s data or third-party data for which the Company has the responsibility for safekeeping. Additionally, such an attack could adversely affect our operations, reputation and financial results.

---

 



We are subject to a number of risks as a U.S. government contractor, which could harm our reputation, result in fines or penalties against us and/or adversely impact our financial condition.



Failure to comply with laws and regulations related to government contracts could result in contract termination, suspension or debarment from contracting with the U.S. government, civil fines and criminal prosecution, any of which could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and future financial condition and performance.



We have a substantial amount of indebtedness which could adversely affect our financial position and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our debt agreements.



We currently have, and expect to continue to have, a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2017, we had total debt of $736.3 million. If we are unable to meet the terms of the financial covenants or fail to comply with any of the other restrictions contained in the agreements governing our indebtedness, an event of default could occur, causing the debt related to such agreement to become immediately due. If such acceleration occurs, we may not be able to repay such indebtedness as required. Since indebtedness under our 2017 Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of our assets, acceleration of this debt could result in foreclosure of those assets and a negative impact on our operations. In addition, a failure to meet the terms of our 2017 Credit Facility could result in a reduction of future borrowing capacity under the 2017 Credit Facility, causing a loss of liquidity. A loss of liquidity could adversely impact our ability to execute projects in our backlog, obtain new projects, engage subcontractors, and attract and retain key employees.



Conversion of our outstanding Convertible Notes could dilute ownership interests of existing stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock.



Based on the terms of the indenture for the Convertible Notes, we may redeem the Convertible Notes in cash, shares of our Common Stock or a combination of the two. As a result, a conversion of some or all of the Convertible Notes may dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders. Any sales in the public market of our Common Stock issuable upon such conversion of the Convertible Notes could cause the price of our Common Stock to decline. In addition, the existence of the Convertible Notes may encourage short selling by market participants because a conversion of the Convertible Notes could depress the price of our Common Stock.



We may need to include the potential dilutive impact of our Convertible Notes in our diluted earnings per share calculation.



We currently intend to pay the principal amount of our Convertible Notes in cash; therefore, we have not included the potential dilutive effect of our Convertible Notes in our diluted earnings per share calculations. If, however, there is a change in future circumstances as a result of a decline in our projected cash flow, available cash/liquidity or other reasons, we may conclude at such time that it will be preferable to use shares to satisfy the Convertible Notes. Such a change in our intentions would result in the inclusion of the potential dilutive impact of the Convertible Notes in our diluted earnings per share calculation, which would result in a decrease in our diluted earnings per share.



Weather can significantly affect our revenue and profitability.



Inclement weather conditions, such as significant storms and unusual temperatures, can impact our ability to perform work. Adverse weather conditions can cause delays and increases in project costs, resulting in variability in our revenue and profitability.



Our international operations expose us to economic, political and other risks, as well as uncertainty related to U.S. Government funding, which could adversely affect our revenue and earnings. In addition, we could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.



For the year ended December 31, 2017, we derived approximately $143.6 million of revenue from our work on projects located outside of the United States. Our international operations expose us to risks inherent in doing business in certain hostile regions outside the United States, including political risks; risks of loss due to acts of war; unstable economic, financial and market conditions; potential incompatibility with foreign subcontractors and vendors; foreign currency controls and fluctuations; trade restrictions; logistical challenges; variations in taxes; and changes in labor conditions, labor strikes and difficulties in staffing and managing international operations. Failure to successfully manage risks associated with our international operations could result in higher operating costs than anticipated or could delay or limit our ability to generate revenue and income from construction operations in key international markets.



The U.S. federal government has approved various spending bills for the construction of defense- and diplomacy-related projects and has allocated significant funds to the defense of U.S. interests around the world from the threat of terrorism. The federal government has also approved funds for development in conjunction with the relocation of military personnel into Guam. However, federal government funding levels for construction projects in the Middle East have decreased significantly over the past several years as the

---

 

U.S. government has reduced the number of military troops and support personnel in the region. As a result, we have seen a decrease in the number and size of federal government projects available to us in this region. Any decrease in U.S. federal government funding for projects in Guam or in other U.S. Territories or countries in which we are pursuing work may result in project delays or cancellations, which could reduce our revenue and earnings.



Finally, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010, and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. While our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws, there is no assurance that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from circumstances or actions that could result in possible criminal penalties or other sanctions, including contract cancellations or debarment and loss of reputation, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.



Our chairman and chief executive officer could exert influence over the Company due to his position and significant ownership interest.



As of December 31, 2017, our chairman and chief executive officer, Ronald N. Tutor, and three trusts controlled by Mr. Tutor (the “Tutor Group”) owned approximately 18% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock. Additionally, one of our current directors was appointed by Mr. Tutor pursuant to his right to nominate one member to our Board of Directors, so long as the Tutor Group owns at least 11.25% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock. Accordingly, Mr. Tutor could exert influence over the outcome of a range of corporate matters, including the election of directors and the approval or rejection of other extraordinary transactions, such as a takeover attempt or sale of the Company or its assets.



In connection with mergers and acquisitions, we have recorded goodwill and other intangible assets that could become impaired and adversely affect our operating results. Assessing whether impairment has occurred requires us to make significant judgments and assumptions about the future, which are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and if actual events turn out to be materially less favorable than the judgments we make and the assumptions we use, we may be required to record impairment charges in the future.



We had approximately $635.4 million of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017. We assess these assets for impairment annually, or more often if required. Our assessments involve a number of estimates and assumptions that are inherently subjective, require significant judgment and regard highly uncertain matters that are subject to change. The use of different assumptions or estimates could materially affect the determination as to whether or not an impairment has occurred. In addition, if future events are less favorable than what we assumed or estimated in our impairment analysis, we may be required to record impairment charge, which could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.



ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS



None.

---

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES



We have office facilities and equipment yards in the following locations, which we believe are suitable and adequate for our current needs:













  



ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS



Legal Proceedings are set forth in Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and are incorporated herein by reference.

  

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES



We do not own or operate any mines; however, we may be considered a mine operator under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 because we provide construction services to customers in the mining industry. Accordingly, we provide information regarding mine-safety violations and other mining-regulation matters in Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-K.

  

---

 

PART II.



ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES



Market Information



Our Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TPC.” The quarterly high and low prices for our Common Stock in 2017 and 2016 were as follows:







Holders



At February 21, 2018, there were 401 holders of record of our Common Stock, including holders of record on behalf of an indeterminate number of beneficial owners.



Dividends and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities



We did not pay dividends or repurchase our Common Stock during 2017, nor do we have any immediate plans to do so. Furthermore, some of our debt agreements restrict us from paying dividends or repurchasing stock.



Issuance of Unregistered Securities



None.



---

 

Performance Graph



The following graph compares the cumulative five-year total return to shareholders on our Common Stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the NYSE Composite Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Heavy Construction Index. We selected the Dow Jones U.S. Heavy Construction Index because we believe the index reflects the market conditions within the industry in which we primarily operate. The comparison of total return on investment, defined as the change in year-end stock price plus reinvested dividends, for each of the periods assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2012 in each of our Common Stock, the NYSE Composite Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Heavy Construction Index, with investment weighted on the basis of market capitalization.



The comparisons in the following graph are based on historical data and are not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our Common Stock.



COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN

Tutor Perini Corp NYSE Composite Index Dow Jones U.S. Heavy Construction Index

$225 $220 $175 $150 $125 $100 $75 $50 $25 $0

2012 2013 2014 2015 20

16 2017







---

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA



Selected Consolidated Financial Information



The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules in this Annual Report. The following tables present selected financial data for the last five years. This selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.



















The Company's results for the year ended December 31, 2014 included a positive impact related to changes in the estimated recoveries for two Civil segment projects and a Building segment hospitality and gaming project. With respect to the two Civil segment projects, there was an increase of $25.9 million in income from construction operations ($0.30 per diluted share) and a $9.4 million decrease in income from construction operations ($0.11 per diluted share). The Building project change in estimate resulted in an $11.4 million increase in income from construction operations ($0.14 per diluted share).



---

 

The Company's income from construction operations during the year ended December 31, 2013 was positively impacted by $13.8 million ($0.18 per diluted share) because of changes in the estimated recovery for the above-mentioned hospitality and gaming project.





  

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules in this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. For cautions about relying on such forward-looking statements, please refer to the section entitled “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Annual Report immediately prior to Item 1. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to those discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report.



Executive Overview



Consolidated revenue for 2017 was $4.8 billion compared to $5.0 billion for 2016. The slight reduction was primarily due to decreased volume in our Building and Civil segments attributed to various projects that are completed or nearing completion. The decrease was partially offset by higher volume on certain Civil segment projects in California and New York, as well as certain Building segment projects in California and Maryland. In addition, revenue in 2017 was negatively impacted by the timing of certain Building and Civil projects that are in ramp-up stages.



Consolidated revenue for 2016 was $5.0 compared to $4.9 billion for 2015. The modest improvement was attributable to higher volume in our Building segment, driven by various Building projects primarily in California.



Income from construction operations for 2017 was $179.5 million compared to $201.9 million for 2016. The decrease was driven by net unfavorable adjustments primarily related to certain mechanical projects, none of which were individually material, the above-mentioned volume changes, and higher compensation-related general and administrative expenses in anticipation of a greater volume of new work. The decrease was partially offset by work performed on certain higher margin Civil and Building projects.



Income from construction operations for 2016 was $201.9 million compared to $105.4 million for 2015. The increase was primarily due to significantly improved operating performance in all segments, as income from construction operations in 2015 included the impact of significant project charges recorded for various Five Star Electric projects in New York in the Specialty Contractors

---

 

segment, decreased activity on certain higher-margin civil projects, unfavorable adjustments related to the estimate of costs to complete an office building project in New York and the adverse Brightwater litigation-related charge for a legacy civil project.



The effective tax rate was (0.4)%, 35.7% and 38.7% for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The effective tax rate for 2017 was positively impacted by the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”), which was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The TCJA includes a number of provisions, including the lowering of the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. As a result of the TCJA, we recognized an income tax benefit of $53.3 million related primarily to the adjustments resulting from the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities. The 2016 rate was favorably impacted by rate changes associated with a shift in revenue mix between states affecting state apportionment, as well as various return-to-provision and deferred tax adjustments related to depreciation. The 2015 rate was favorably impacted by the resolution of certain state tax matters.



Earnings per diluted share was $2.92, $1.92 and $0.91 in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Earnings per diluted share in 2017 included the above-mentioned tax benefit of $53.3 million ($1.05 per diluted share), as well as a gain on a $37.0 million ($0.43 per diluted share) legal settlement (see Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). The substantial earnings growth in 2016 was due to significantly improved operating performance in all segments, as discussed above.



Cash flow from operations was $163.6 million in 2017 (a record high for the Company since the 2008 merger) compared to $113.1 million in 2016, and compared to a cash flow from operations of $14.1 million in 2015. The record operating cash generated in 2017 was due to continued improvements in the Company’s billing and collection cycle as a result of management’s intense focus on working capital management.



Consolidated new awards in 2017 were $5.8 billion compared to $3.7 billion in 2016 and $4.6 billion in 2015. The Civil segment was the predominant contributor of new awards during 2017. The Civil and Building segments were both major contributor of new awards during 2016. The Building segment was the primary contributor of new awards during 2015.

 

Consolidated backlog was $7.3 billion, $6.2 billion and $7.5 billion as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company experienced backlog growth of 17% in 2017, driven by the Civil segment. As of December 31, 2017, the mix of backlog by segment was 57% for Civil, 23% for Building and 20% for Specialty Contractors. The reduced level of backlog at the end of 2016 was the result of revenue burn during the year that outpaced new awards in the Building and Specialty Contractors segments. The relatively higher backlog at the end of 2015 was primarily due to significant new awards in the Building segment, partially offset by revenue burn that outpaced new awards in the Civil and Specialty Contractors segments.



Most projects in the Civil segment’s backlog typically convert to revenue over a period of three to five years and in the Building and Specialty Contractors segments over a period of one to three years. We estimate that approximately $3.6 billion, or 49%, of our backlog as of December 31, 2017 will be recognized as revenue in 2018.



The following table presents the changes in backlog in 2017:







The outlook for our Company’s growth over the next several years continues to be the most favorable it has been in many years, particularly in the Civil segment. In addition to our substantial backlog, we expect significant new award activity based on long-term capital spending plans by state, local and federal customers, as well as bipartisan support for infrastructure investments. In recent U.S. elections, voters in numerous states approved dozens of long-term transportation funding measures totaling approximately $200 billion in long-term funding. The largest of these were in Los Angeles County, where Measure M, a half-cent sales tax increase, was approved and is expected to generate $120 billion of funding over 40 years and in Seattle, Washington, where Sound Transit 3 was passed and is expected to generate $54 billion of funding over 25 years. In addition, the Trump Administration has proposed a significant infrastructure investment program. Also, several large, long-duration civil infrastructure programs with which we are already involved are progressing, such as California’s High-Speed Rail system and New York City’s East Side Access project. Planning and permitting activities continue on Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor Improvements, including the Gateway Program, which is expected to eventually bring new rail tunnels beneath the Hudson River to connect service between New Jersey and New York’s Penn Station. Finally, sustained low interest rates and capital costs are anticipated to drive high demand and continued spending by private and public customers on infrastructure projects.

---

 



For a more detailed discussion of operating performance of each business segment, corporate general and administrative expenses and other items, see “Results of Segment Operations,” “Corporate, Tax and Other Matters” and “Liquidity and Financial Condition” below.

   

Results of Segment Operations



The following presents the Company’s results of operations by segment:



Civil Segment



Revenue and income from construction operations for the Civil segment are summarized as follows:





Revenue for 2017 decreased a modest 4% compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily due to the impact of certain projects in New York, Washington and the Midwest that are completed or nearing completion. The decrease was partially offset by increased activity on certain mass-transit projects in California and New York that are ramping up. Revenue for 2016 decreased 12% compared to 2015, principally due to the prior-year completion of a large runway reconstruction project in New York and reduced activity in 2016 on a platform project at Hudson Yards in New York, which is nearing completion. The decrease was partially offset by increased activity on various projects, including a large tunnel project in Seattle, Washington and a large mass-transit project in California.



Despite the revenue reduction mentioned above, income from construction operations increased 11% in 2017 compared to 2016, principally due to increased project execution activity on certain higher-margin projects in California and New York. Income from construction operations increased 19% in 2016 compared to 2015, due to improved operating performance and because the 2015 results included the Brightwater litigation-related charge of $23.9 million. The increase was partially offset by the impact of the reduced volume discussed above.



Operating margin was 12.0% in 2017 compared to 10.3% in 2016 and 7.7% in 2015. The operating margin increases in 2017 and 2016 were primarily due to the reasons discussed above that impacted revenue and income from construction operations.



New awards in the Civil segment totaled $3.0 billion in 2017, $1.6 billion in 2016 and $1.1 billion in 2015. New awards in 2017 included a $1.4 billion joint venture mass-transit project in California; a bridge project in Iowa valued at $323 million; a mass-transit project in New York worth $292 million; a joint venture tunnel project for a hydroelectric generating station in British Columbia, Canada, valued at $274 million; a bridge project in New York valued at $189 million; $97 million of additional scope for a platform project in New York; a joint venture bridge project in Minnesota, for which the Company’s portion is valued at $90 million; a bridge project in New York valued at $82 million; a highway project in Maryland worth $78 million; and a military training range project in Guam worth $78 million.



New awards in 2016 included a $663 million mass-transit project in New York, approximately $277 million of new bridge projects in the Midwest, the Company’s share of $244 million of additional contract scope for a mass-transit project in California, a $107 million highway project in Virginia and a $97 million airport terminal expansion project in Guam. New awards in 2015 included a mass-transit project in New York valued at $80 million; highway projects in Delaware, Maryland and Pennsylvania valued at $70 million, $60 million and $58 million, respectively; and a tunnel extension project in New York worth $56 million.



Backlog for the Civil segment was $4.1 billion as of December 31, 2017, compared to $2.7 billion as of both December 31, 2016 and 2015. Civil segment backlog grew 54% year-over-year in 2017 as a result of significant new award activity, including the above-mentioned $1.4 billion mass-transit project in California. The segment continues to experience strong demand reflected in a large pipeline of prospective projects and substantial anticipated funding from various voter-approved transportation measures; the Trump Administration’s considerable proposed infrastructure investment program; and public agencies’ long-term spending plans. The Civil segment is well-positioned to capture its share of these prospective projects. The segment, however, continues to face considerable competition, including occasional aggressive bids from foreign competitors.



---

 

Building Segment



Revenue and income from construction operations for the Building segment are summarized as follows:









Revenue for 2017 decreased slightly compared to 2016, principally due to decreased project execution activity on certain projects in California and Florida that are substantially complete, partially offset by increased activity on certain hospitality and gaming projects and a large technology project. Revenue for 2016 increased 15% compared to 2015, principally due to increased activity on various commercial office, technology, health care, hospitality and gaming, and retail building projects in California. This increase was partially offset by the completion in 2015 of a hospitality and gaming project in Mississippi.



Income from construction operations decreased 34% in 2017 compared to 2016, primarily due to favorable close-out activities in 2016 on two projects in New York and the volume changes mentioned above. The decrease was partially offset by improved performance on a large technology project in California that is nearing completion. Income from construction operations increased considerably in 2016 compared to 2015 due to improved operating performance and the above-mentioned favorable close-out activities on the two New York projects, as well as unfavorable adjustments in 2015, totaling $24.3 million, to the estimated cost to complete an office building project in New York.



Operating margin was 1.8% in 2017 compared to 2.5% in 2016 and (0.1)% in 2015. The operating margin changes in 2017 and 2016 were due to the factors mentioned above that drove the changes in revenue and income from construction operations.

 

New awards in the Building segment totaled $1.7 billion in 2017, $1.3 billion in 2016 and $2.4 billion in 2015. New awards in 2017 included four health care projects in California collectively worth $328 million; $250 million of initial funding for a new technology office building in California, which is eventually anticipated to be worth approximately $500 million; additional scope of work valued at $121 million for a technology office project in California; a U.S. embassy renovation project in Uruguay valued at $87 million; and an $80 million military facility project in Saudi Arabia. New awards in 2016 included a hospitality and gaming project in California and another in Maryland, collectively valued at $372 million; a hospitality project in California valued at $120 million; and a multi-unit residential project in Florida valued at $72 million. New awards in 2015 included a technology research and development office project valued at $800 million and $230 million of incremental funding for a biotechnology project, both in California, and a hospitality project in Pennsylvania worth $239 million.



Backlog for the Building segment was $1.7 billion as of December 31, 2017, compared to $2.0 billion as of December 31, 2016 and $2.8 billion as of December 31, 2015. The decline in backlog for both 2017 and 2016 was due to revenue burn that outpaced new awards during each year. Building segment backlog is anticipated to grow in 2018, as the segment continues to have a large volume of prospective projects, some of which have already been bid and are expected to be selected and awarded by customers during the first half of 2018. Elevated demand is expected to continue due to ongoing customer spending supported by a low interest rate environment. The Building segment is well-positioned to capture its share of prospective projects based on its strong customer relationships and long-term reputation for excellence in delivering high-quality projects on time and within budget.



Specialty Contractors Segment



Revenue and income from construction operations for the Specialty Contractors segment are summarized as follows:









Revenue for 2017 decreased modestly compared to 2016. Decreased activity on various electrical projects in New York was largely offset by increased activity on various electrical projects in the southern U.S. and California. Revenue for 2016 was virtually level with 2015.



Income from construction operations decreased 50% in 2017 compared to 2016, principally due to the impact of unfavorable project adjustments on certain mechanical projects in New York and California, none of which were individually material. The decrease was partially offset by improved profitability on various electrical projects in New York and increased activity on various electrical projects in the southern U.S. and California. Income from construction operations increased 141% in 2016 because 2015 included

---

 

unfavorable adjustments totaling $45.6 million for several Five Star Electric projects in New York, none of which were individually material.



Operating margin was 1.6% in 2017 compared to 3.1% in 2016 and 1.3% in 2015. The margin changes in 2017 and 2016 were due to the factors mentioned above that impacted income from construction operations for both years.



New awards in the Specialty Contractors segment totaled $1.1 billion in 2017, $867 million in 2016 and $1.1 billion in 2015. New awards in 2017 included approximately $426 million for various electrical projects in the southern U.S. and California, two electrical subcontracts for mass-transit projects in New York collectively valued at $158 million, and four mechanical contracts in New York with a total value of $131 million. New awards in 2016 included various mechanical projects in New York collectively valued at approximately $146 million, several electrical projects in the southern United States totaling approximately $93 million and an electrical subcontract for a mass-transit project in New York valued at $86 million. New awards in 2015 included an electrical subcontract valued at $90 million for a mass-transit project in New York and an electrical subcontract valued at $73 million for a Hudson Yards office tower in New York.



Backlog for the Specialty Contractors segment was $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2017 compared to $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2016 and $1.9 billion as of December 31, 2015. The Specialty Contractors segment continues to have a substantial volume of prospective projects, with demand for its services supported by sustained spending on civil and building projects. The Specialty Contractors segment is well-positioned to capture its share of prospective projects based on the size and scale of our business units that operate in New York, Texas, Florida and California and the strong reputation held by these business units for high-quality work on large, complex projects.



Corporate, Tax and Other Matters



Corporate General and Administrative Expenses



Corporate general and administrative expenses were $65.9 million in 2017, $60.2 million in 2016 and $54.2 million in 2015. The increase in 2017 was primarily due to higher compensation-related expenses pertaining to the employment and retention of certain key executives. In 2016, the increase in corporate general and administrative expenses compared to 2015 was predominantly due to increased compensation expense attributable to improved financial results and the hiring of several key executives.



Other Income, Net, Interest Expense and Income Tax Benefit (Provision)







Other income, net, increased by $36.9 million in 2017 compared to 2016, and decreased $6.6 million in 2016 compared to 2015. The increase in 2017 was due to a $37.0 million legal settlement, as discussed in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Other income in 2015 included adjustments to decrease contingent earn-out liabilities related to prior business acquisitions.



Interest expense increased $9.6 million in 2017 compared to the prior year, principally due to non-cash extinguishment costs related to our debt restructuring transactions in April 2017, as well as increased non-cash interest charges from the amortization of debt discount and issuance costs. Interest expense in 2016 increased $14.7 million compared to 2015 primarily due to cash and non-cash interest expense related to the Convertible Notes issued in June 2016, as well as an increase in non-cash interest expense associated with fees related to two amendments to the Company’s 2014 Credit Facility. The year ended December 31, 2016 was also impacted by higher net borrowing rates.



The effective income tax rate was (0.4)% for 2017, 35.7% for 2016 and 38.7% for 2015. As discussed in the Executive Overview, we recognized an income tax benefit of $53.3 million in 2017 related primarily to the adjustments resulting from the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities due to the enactment of the TCJA. Excluding the benefit resulting from the enactment of the TCJA, the effective income tax rate for 2017 would have been 34.3%. The effective tax rate for 2016 compared to 2015 was favorably impacted by rate changes associated with a shift in revenue mix between states affecting state apportionment, as well as various return-to-provision and depreciation adjustments.

  

Liquidity and Financial Condition



Liquidity is provided by available cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from operations, credit facilities and access to capital markets. On April 20, 2017, we issued $500 million of senior notes and entered into a new credit facility with a $350 million revolver.

---

 

We used the net proceeds to repurchase or redeem our 7.625% Senior Notes due 2018, (the “2010 Senior Notes”) in full and repay all borrowings under our Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (with subsequent amendments, the “2014 Credit Facility”, with Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer and a syndicate of other lenders. The 2014 Credit Facility provides for a $300 million revolving credit facility (the “2014 Revolver”), a $250 million term loan (the “Term Loan”) and a sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit up to the aggregate amount of $150 million, all maturing on May 1, 2018. We believe that the increased liquidity that resulted from this refinancing will help fund any working capital needs for the significant number of project opportunities that we see over the next several years.



Cash and Working Capital



Cash and cash equivalents were $192.9 million as of December 31, 2017 compared to $146.1 million as of December 31, 2016. Cash available for general corporate purposes was $94.7 million and $49.5 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with the remainder being our proportionate share of cash held by our unconsolidated joint ventures and also amounts held by our consolidated joint ventures, which, in both cases, were available only for joint venture-related uses, including distributions to joint venture partners of $98.2 million and $96.6 million, respectively. In addition, our restricted cash and restricted investments, held primarily to secure insurance-related contingent obligations, were $4.8 million and $53.0 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2017 compared to restricted cash of $50.5 million as of December 31, 2016.



During the year ended December 31, 2017, net cash provided by operating activities was $163.6 million, due primarily to cash generated from income sources partially offset by changes in net investment in working capital. The change in working capital primarily reflects an increase in accounts receivable and costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings, which was mostly offset by an increase in billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $113.3 million in cash was provided from operating activities, primarily due to favorable operating results, somewhat offset by changes in net investment in working capital. The change in working capital primarily reflected increases in accounts receivable (both trade accounts receivable and retention) related to billing activity, offset by a reduction of costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings.  



Cash flow from operations for 2017 was a record high for the Company since the 2008 merger. In addition, for the second consecutive year the Company’s cash flow from operations exceeded its net income. The $50.2 million improvement in cash flow from operations for 2017 compared to 2016 was due to a lower net investment in working capital, which reflects management’s continued focus on improving the Company’s billing and collection cycle. Cash flow from operations for 2016 increased $99.3 million compared to 2015. The increase reflected improved year-over-year profitability and lower net investment in working capital resulting from a significant reduction in costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings. The improvement in cash generation in 2016 compared to 2015 was even more pronounced when considering there were significant collections by the Company in the first quarter of 2015 related to the settlements of past disputes over the CityCenter project in Las Vegas, Nevada and a hospital project in Santa Monica, California.



During 2017 and 2016, we used $41.4 million and $18.5 million of cash from investing activities, respectively. Net cash used in both years was primarily due to the acquisition of property and equipment.



During 2017, we utilized $75.4 million of cash from financing activities, primarily due to the net paydown of debt, $17.5 million distributions paid to noncontrolling interests and the payment of $15.3 million in debt issuance and extinguishment costs related to the debt restructuring transactions. Net cash used in financing activities for 2016 was $24.2 million, which was primarily due to the net pay down of debt and the payment of $15.1 million in debt issuance costs associated with two amendments to the 2014 Credit Facility and the issuance of $200.0 million of Convertible Notes.



As of December 31, 2017, we had working capital of $1.5 billion, a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 1.94 and a ratio of debt to equity of 0.43 compared to working capital of $1.3 billion, a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 1.87 and a ratio of debt to equity of 0.49 at December 31, 2016.



Due to the enactment of the TCJA, as discussed in Corporate, Tax and Other Matters, we expect that our future cash requirements for income taxes will decrease as a result of the reduction of the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% that became effective January 1, 2018.



Debt



Summarized below are the key terms of our debt as of December 31, 2017. For additional information, refer to Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, as applicable.



2017 Credit Facility



On April 20, 2017, we entered into a credit agreement (the “2017 Credit Facility”) with SunTrust Bank as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer and a syndicate of other lenders. The 2017 Credit Facility provides for a $350 million revolving

---

 

credit facility (the “2017 Revolver”) and a sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit and swingline loans up to the aggregate amount of $150 million and $10 million, respectively, both maturing on April 20, 2022 unless any of the Convertible Notes are outstanding on December 17, 2020, in which case all such borrowings will mature on December 17, 2020 (subject to certain further exceptions). In addition, the 2017 Credit Facility permits additional borrowings in an aggregate amount of $150 million, which can be in the form of increased capacity on the 2017 Revolver or the establishment of one or more term loans.



The table below presents our actual and required consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio and consolidated leverage ratio under the 2017 Credit Facility for the period, which are calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis:







As of the filing date of this Form 10-K, we are in compliance and expect to continue to be in compliance with the financial covenants under the 2017 Credit Facility.



2017 Senior Notes



On April 20, 2017, we issued $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.875% Senior Notes due 2025 (the “2017 Senior Notes”) in a private placement. Interest on the 2017 Senior Notes is payable in arrears semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning on November 1, 2017.



Repurchase and Redemption of 2010 Senior Notes and Termination of 2014 Credit Facility



We used proceeds from the 2017 Senior Notes and 2017 Revolver to repurchase or redeem our 2010 Senior Notes, to pay off our Term Loan and 2014 Revolver, as well as to pay accrued but unpaid interest and fees. In addition, we satisfied and discharged the indenture governing the 2010 Senior Notes and terminated the 2014 Credit Facility.



Convertible Notes



On June 15, 2016, we completed an offering of $200 million of 2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due June 15, 2021 (the “Convertible Notes”). The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company. Interest on the Convertible Notes is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on December 15, 2016, until the maturity date. As of December 31, 2017, none of the conversion provisions of our Convertible Notes have been triggered.



Equipment financing and mortgages



We have certain loans entered into for the purchase of specific property, plant and equipment and secured by the assets purchased. The aggregate balance of equipment financing loans was approximately $61.1 million and $84.9 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with interest rates ranging from 1.90% to 5.93% with equal monthly installment payments over periods up to ten years with additional balloon payments of $12.4 million in 2021 and $6.3 million in 2022 on the remaining loans outstanding at December 31, 2017. The aggregate balance of mortgage loans was approximately $15.7 million and $16.7 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with interest rates ranging from a fixed 2.50% to LIBOR plus 3% and equal monthly installment payments over periods up to seven years with additional balloon payments of $2.6 million in 2018, $2.9 million in 2021 and $7.0 million in 2023.



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements



None

---

 



Contractual Obligations



Our outstanding contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017 are summarized in the following table:







Critical Accounting Policies



Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates are based on information available through the date of the issuance of the financial statements; accordingly, actual results in future periods could differ from these estimates. Significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements apply to the following critical accounting policies:



Method of Accounting for Contracts — Contract revenue is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method based on contract cost incurred to date compared to total estimated contract cost. The estimates used in the percentage-of-completion method during the contract performance period require judgment and assumptions regarding both future events and the evaluation of contingencies such as the impact of change orders, liability claims, other contract disputes, the achievement of contractual performance standards, and potential variances in project schedule and costs. Changes to the total estimated contract cost, either due to unexpected events or revisions to management’s initial estimates, for a given project are recognized in the period in which they are determined.



In certain instances, we provide guaranteed completion dates and/or achievement of other performance criteria. Failure to meet schedule or performance guarantees could result in unrealized incentive fees and/or liquidated damages. In addition, depending on the type of contract, unexpected increases in contract cost may be unrecoverable, resulting in total cost exceeding revenue realized from the projects. The Company generally provides limited warranties for work performed, with warranty periods typically extending for a limited duration following substantial completion of the Company’s work on a project. Historically, warranty claims have not resulted in material costs incurred.



Claims arising from construction contracts have been made against the Company by customers, and the Company has made claims against customers for cost incurred in excess of current contract provisions. The Company recognizes revenue, but not profit, for claims when it is determined that recovery of incurred cost is probable and the amounts can be reliably estimated. These requirements are satisfied under GAAP’s Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-35, Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts,  when the contract or other evidence provides a legal basis for the claim, additional costs were caused by circumstances that were unforeseen at the contract date and not the result of deficiencies in the Company’s performance, claim-related costs are identifiable and considered reasonable in view of the work performed, and evidence supporting the claim is objective and verifiable.



Construction Joint Ventures — Certain contracts are executed through joint ventures. The arrangements are often formed for the single business purpose of executing a specific project and allow the Company to share risks and secure specialty skills required for project execution.



In accordance with ASC 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”) the Company assesses its joint ventures at inception to determine if any meet the qualifications of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). The Company considers a joint venture a VIE if either (a) the total equity investment is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (b) characteristics of a controlling financial interest are missing (either the ability to make decisions through voting or other rights, the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity), or (c) the voting rights of the equity holders are not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity and/or their rights to

---

 

receive the expected residual returns of the entity and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. Upon the occurrence of certain events outlined in ASC 810, the Company reassesses its initial determination of whether the joint venture is a VIE.



The Company also evaluates whether it is the primary beneficiary of each VIE and consolidates the VIE if the Company has both (a) the power to direct the economically significant activities of the entity and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company considers the contractual agreements that define the ownership structure, distribution of profits and losses, risks, responsibilities, indebtedness, voting rights and board representation of the respective parties in determining whether it qualifies as the primary beneficiary. The Company also considers all parties that have direct or implicit variable interests when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary. When the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary, the VIE is consolidated. As required by ASC 810, management’s assessment of whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE is continuously performed.



For construction joint ventures that do not need to be fully consolidated, the Company accounts for its interest in the joint ventures using the proportionate consolidation method, whereby the Company’s proportionate share of the joint ventures’ assets, liabilities, revenue and cost of operations are included in the appropriate classifications in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. See Note 1(b) and Note 11 for additional discussion regarding VIEs.



Recoverability of Goodwill — Goodwill represents the excess of amounts paid over the fair value of net assets acquired from an acquisition. In order to determine the amount of goodwill resulting from an acquisition, we perform an assessment to determine the value of the acquired company's tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities. In our assessment, we determine whether identifiable intangible assets exist, which typically include backlog, customer relationships and trade name.



We test goodwill for impairment annually in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year for each of our Civil, Building and Specialty Contractors operating segments, which are the same as our reporting units for goodwill impairment analysis. This test requires us to estimate the fair value of each reporting unit, using income and market approaches and to compare the calculated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, which is equal to the reporting unit’s net assets. If the calculated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we perform a second step involving a hypothetical purchase allocation for that reporting unit resulting in an implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. If the implied fair value is less than the carrying value of goodwill, an impairment charge equal to the difference is recognized. Additionally, in the quarters preceding the fourth quarter, we evaluate events and circumstances, such as changes in the legal environment and business climate, the operating performance of the reporting units and general industry trends, to determine if such factors indicate that it is likely that the goodwill for one or more of our reporting units is impaired, thus warranting the performance of the annual impairment test sooner than the fourth quarter of the year.



During the fourth quarter of 2017, we conducted our annual goodwill impairment test and determined that our goodwill was not impaired. The impairment evaluation process requires assumptions that are subject to a high degree of judgement about variables such as revenue growth rates, profitability levels, discount rates, industry market multiples and weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Changes in these variables would impact the results of our impairment tests. For example, as of October 1, 2017, changes of 0.5% in the WACC would have resulted in changes in the fair value of reporting units ranging from $(30.0) million to $40.0 million, which would not have changed the conclusions reached in our annual goodwill impairment test.



New Accounting Pronouncements — For discussion of recently adopted accounting standards and updates, see Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

  

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK



Interest rate risk is our primary market risk exposure. Borrowing under our 2017 Credit Facility and certain other debt obligations have variable interest rates subject to interest rate risk. As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $8.4 million of net borrowings with variable interest rates. If short-term floating interest rates were to increase by 0.50%, the change in interest on these borrowings would increase by approximately $50,000.

  

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA



The Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Schedules are set forth in Item 15 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.

  

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE



None.

---

 

  

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES



Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures — An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined by Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), as of December 31, 2017 was made under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2017, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act were recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in such reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.



Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting — Our management, under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). In designing and evaluating our system of internal control over financial reporting, we recognize that inherent limitations exist in any control system no matter how well designed and operated, and we can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In making this assessment, management utilized the criteria issued in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  Based on this assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.



Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.



Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.



Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting — There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



---

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of

Tutor Perini Corporation

Sylmar, California



Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting



We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Tutor Perini Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.



We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, of the Company and our report dated February 27, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.



Basis for Opinion 



The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.



We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.



Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting



A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.



Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP



Los Angeles, California



February 27, 2018



---

 

 ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION



Departure of Director



On February 21, 2018, Thomas C. Leppert notified the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Tutor Perini Corporation of his decision to resign from the Board, effective immediately.



Concurrent with Mr. Leppert’s departure, the Board approved a reduction in the size of the Board from twelve to eleven members.



PART III.



ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE



The information required by this Item 10 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of 2017.

  

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION



The information required by this Item 11 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of 2017.

  

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS



The information required by this Item 12 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of 2017.

  

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE



The information required by this Item 13 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of 2017.

  

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES



The information required by this Item 14 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of 2017.

  

---

 

PART IV.



ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES



TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



1.           Financial Statements:

Our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 and the notes thereto, together with the report of the independent registered public accounting firm on those consolidated financial statements are hereby filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, beginning on page F-1.



2.           Financial Statement Schedules:

All consolidated financial statement schedules are omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and in the Notes thereto.



3.           Exhibits:



EXHIBIT INDEX



The following designated exhibits are, as indicated below, either filed herewith or have heretofore been filed with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Act of 1934 and are referred to and incorporated herein by reference to such filings.



---

*Management contract or compensatory arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(a)(3) of Form 10-K

---

 

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.