Attached files
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017
or
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number: 000-50502
ROOT9B HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact
Name of registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
|
20-0443575
|
(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
102 N
Cascade Avenue, Suite 220
Colorado
Springs, CO 80903
(Address of principal executive offices)
(719)
358-8735
(Registrant’s telephone number)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such
reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer”, “smaller reporting company” and "emerging
growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
☐(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
|
☒
|
|
|
Emerging
growth company
|
☐
|
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s
classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
6,100,275 shares of common stock were outstanding as of June 28,
2017.
Table of Contents
|
|
|
Page
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2017 (Unaudited) and December 31,
2016
|
1
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016
|
3
|
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited) for the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016
|
4
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016
|
5
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
7
|
|
|
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
20
|
|
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
|
28
|
|
|
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
28
|
|
|
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
28
|
|
|
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
|
28
|
|
|
Item 5.
Other Information
|
28
|
|
|
Item 6.
Exhibits
|
28
|
|
|
Signatures
|
30
|
PART I: FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial
Statements (unaudited)
ROOT9B HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March
31, 2017
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Revised)
|
|
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$1,372,028
|
$1,445,028
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
1,097,800
|
1,664,808
|
Cost
and estimated earnings in excess of billings
|
505,160
|
298,814
|
Assets
held for sale
|
8,645,897
|
10,259,963
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
379,732
|
369,332
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
12,000,617
|
14,037,945
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, at cost less accumulated depreciation
|
2,260,257
|
2,417,456
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
2,307,700
|
2,307,700
|
Intangible
assets, net
|
38,635
|
49,372
|
Investment
in cost-method investee
|
100,000
|
100,000
|
Deposits
and other assets
|
134,003
|
130,554
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
2,580,338
|
2,587,626
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$16,841,212
|
$19,043,027
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Revised)
|
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
Notes
payable
|
$-
|
$1,600,000
|
Related
party notes payable
|
745,000
|
500,000
|
Accounts
payable
|
2,114,779
|
1,932,813
|
Billings
in excess of costs and estimated earnings
|
602,760
|
676,232
|
Liabilities
held for sale
|
3,009,998
|
3,713,919
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
1,775,860
|
1,900,364
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
8,248,397
|
10,323,328
|
|
|
|
Long
term debt, net of discount of $3,744,604 and $2,810,103,
respectively
|
5,026,396
|
2,960,897
|
Notes
payable
|
1,600,000
|
-
|
Derivative
liability
|
929,341
|
1,692,053
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent liabilities
|
7,555,737
|
4,652,950
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, $.001 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized, 6,100,275
shares issued and outstanding
|
6,102
|
6,102
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
92,742,310
|
91,214,763
|
Deficit
|
(92,116,930)
|
(87,574,127)
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
405,596
|
420,011
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
1,037,078
|
4,066,749
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
$16,841,212
|
$19,043,027
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2
ROOT9B HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2017 AND 2016
(Unaudited)
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Net revenue
|
$2,654,284
|
$2,031,393
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
Direct
cost of revenue
|
2,383,529
|
2,435,503
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
4,168,750
|
3,321,729
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
178,347
|
167,648
|
|
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
6,730,626
|
5,924,880
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
(4,076,342)
|
(3,893,487)
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income:
|
|
|
Derivative
income
|
762,712
|
1,260,549
|
Interest
expense, net
|
(441,745)
|
(76,136)
|
Other
(expense) income
|
(15,887)
|
13,219
|
|
|
|
Total
other (expense) income
|
305,080
|
1,197,632
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before taxes
|
(3,771,262)
|
(2,695,855)
|
|
|
|
Income
tax expense
|
-
|
(51,905)
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
(3,771,262)
|
(2,747,760)
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
(771,541)
|
(482,462)
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
(4,542,803)
|
(3,230,222)
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
-
|
(6,857)
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$(4,542,803)
|
$(3,237,079)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share from:
|
|
|
Loss
per share from continuing operations
|
$(0.62)
|
$(0.53)
|
Loss
per share from discontinued operations
|
$(0.13)
|
$(0.09)
|
Net
loss per share
|
$(0.74)
|
$(0.62)
|
Diluted loss per common share from:
|
|
|
Loss
per share from continuing operations
|
$(0.62)
|
$(0.53)
|
Loss
per share from discontinued operations
|
$(0.13)
|
$(0.09)
|
Net
loss per share
|
$(0.74)
|
$(0.62)
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares:
|
|
|
Basic
|
6,100,275
|
5,239,400
|
Diluted
|
6,100,275
|
5,239,400
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
ROOT9B HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2017 AND 2016
(Unaudited)
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Net Loss
|
$(4,542,803)
|
$(3,230,222)
|
Other
comprehensive expense:
|
|
|
Foreign
currency translation loss
|
(14,415)
|
(14,814)
|
Other
comprehensive expense:
|
(14,415)
|
(14,814)
|
Comprehensive loss
|
$(4,557,218)
|
$(3,245,036)
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
ROOT9B HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2017 AND 2016
(unaudited)
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(4,542,803)
|
$(3,230,222)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
178,347
|
510,033
|
Amortization
of debt discount
|
225,329
|
35,584
|
Increase
in cash surrender value of officers' life insurance
|
-
|
(12,266)
|
Income
from change in value of derivatives
|
(762,712)
|
(1,260,549)
|
Stock
option compensation expense
|
367,717
|
358,409
|
Loss
on sale of fixed assets
|
21,148
|
-
|
Loss
on assets held for sale
|
164,823
|
-
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
Decrease
(increase) in accounts receivable
|
2,217,072
|
(3,034,674)
|
Decrease
(increase) in marketable securities
|
-
|
(951)
|
Decrease
(increase) in costs and estimated earnings in excess of
billings
|
(206,346)
|
159,598
|
Decrease
(increase) in prepaid expenses
|
51,124
|
61,307
|
Decrease
(increase) in deposits and other assets
|
(6,042)
|
(19,549)
|
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
76,383
|
1,233,566
|
Increase
(decrease) in factored receivables obligation
|
(709,312)
|
1,393,410
|
Increase
(decrease) in billings in excess of costs and estimated
earnings
|
(85,130)
|
(73,476)
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(3,010,402)
|
(3,879,780)
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(12,913)
|
(334,973)
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(12,913)
|
(334,973)
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
Warrants
and options exercised
|
-
|
1,270,782
|
Common
stock issuances
|
-
|
5,331,444
|
Convertible
debt and related party note proceeds
|
3,245,000
|
-
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
3,245,000
|
6,602,226
|
|
|
|
Exchange
loss on foreign currency
|
(14,415)
|
(14,814)
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
207,270
|
2,372,659
|
|
|
|
Cash - beginning of period, before discontinued
operations
|
1,606,875
|
795,682
|
|
|
|
Cash - end of period, before discontinued
operations
|
1,814,145
|
3,168,341
|
Less:
Cash - end of period, discontinued operations
|
(442,117)
|
(279,877)
|
Cash - end of period, continuing
operations
|
$1,372,028
|
$2,888,464
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW
INFORMATION:
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Cash
payments for:
|
|
|
Interest
|
$161,408
|
$14,290
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes
|
$-
|
$51,905
|
|
|
|
Summary
of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
Issuance
of common stock for dividend payment on preferred
stock
|
$-
|
$6,857
|
Fair
Value of warrants issued to induce exercise of Series D
warrants
|
$-
|
$84,525
|
Reclassification
of derivative warrant liability to equity
|
$-
|
$569,492
|
Debt
modification adjustment due to Third Amendment to convertible
promissory notes (debt discount) credited to additional paid-in
capital
|
$580,640
|
$-
|
Fair
value of warrants issued with 2017 Q1 convertible promissory notes
(debt discount) credited to additional paid-in capital
|
$500,815
|
$-
|
Beneficial
conversion feature with 2017 Q1 convertible promissory notes (debt
discount) credited to additional paid-in capital
|
$78,374
|
$-
|
Fair
Value of derivative features issued to Qualified
Purchasers
|
$-
|
$599,228
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
ROOT9B HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note
1:
Basis
of Presentation and General Information
The
accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of
root9B Holdings, Inc. (“root9B” or the
“Company”) have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (“GAAP”) and the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report filed
with the SEC on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. In
the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of
consolidated financial position and the consolidated results of
operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected
herein. Notes to the financial statements which would substantially
duplicate the disclosure contained in the audited consolidated
financial statements for fiscal year 2016 as reported in the 10-K
have been omitted. The consolidated results of operations for
interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results
expected for future quarters or the full year.
Going Concern and Liquidity
We had
a net loss from continuing operations of $3,771,262 for the three
months ended March 31, 2017 and $18,299,187 for the year ended
December 31, 2016. Our working capital increased from $3,714,617 to
$3,752,220 during the three months ended March 31, 2017, and
$1,600,000 of our unsecured convertible promissory notes due on May
21, 2017 were extended to May 21, 2018. The Company has no existing
lines of credit.
During 2016, we incurred substantial costs in our efforts to grow
the Cyber Solutions (“CS”) business segment. We hired
additional personnel, engaged in strategic marketing and
brand-building efforts, built-out the Adversary Pursuit Center
(“APC”) and other new offices opened, incurred legal
fees related to trademarks and patents, and engaged in extensive
research and development projects to enhance the Orkos and HUNT
software platforms. These investments in the Cyber Solutions
segment were made in anticipation of revenue growth during 2017, of
which, there can be no assurance.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we incurred
significant labor costs, software research and development,
and advertising expenses as we continue to invest in and build out
CS resources and expertise as we position this segment for future
growth. We have not been able to secure enough CS contracts to
support our continuing operations, and we anticipate requiring additional capital to grow
our CS business segment, fund operating expenses, and make
principal and interest payments on our promissory note
obligations.
1)
Entering into various debt and equity financing
arrangements described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
2016 and Notes 7 and 8 in this Form
10-Q.
2)
Selling our Control Engineering, Inc.,
(“CEI”) subsidiary on
December 31, 2016 and completing the sale of a substantial portion
of our wholly-owned subsidiary IPSA International, Inc
(“IPSA”) on April 30, 2017. See Note 4
“Discontinued Operations” and Note 13 “Subsequent
Events” for further information.
3)
Focusing
100% of our efforts on the growth of the Cyber Solutions contract
pipeline.
Despite the measures discussed above, our current levels of cash on
hand, working capital and proceeds from the debt offerings in the
first quarter of 2017 and the IPSA transaction has not been
sufficient to alleviate our liquidity issues and, as a result,
management has determined additional capital is required in order
to sustain operations for one year beyond the issuance of these
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
7
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern for at
least the next 12 months following the issuance of our financial
statements and do not include any adjustments to reflect the
possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of
assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may
result should we be unable to continue as a going
concern.
Revision of Previously-Issued Financial Statements
During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, the Company revised its
consolidated financial statements for 2016 to record an income tax
benefit for discontinued operations related to an error identified
in its income tax provision for the three months ended December 31,
2016. Additionally, the Company recorded a loss on assets held for
sale for discontinued operations to arrive at the fair value of the
net assets held for sale determined at December 31, 2016. As
detailed below, the combined net effect of these adjustments were
$0 and only affected discontinued operations.
The Company assessed the effect of the above errors in the
aggregate on prior periods’ financial statements in
accordance with the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletins
No. 99 and 108 and, based on an analysis of quantitative and
qualitative factors, determined that the errors were not material
to any of the Company’s prior annual financial
statements.
The Company determined that the correction of the cumulative
amounts of the errors would be material to the first quarter 2017
unaudited consolidated financial statements, and as such, the
Company revised its previously-issued consolidated financial
statements for 2016.
All financial information contained in the accompanying notes to
these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements has been
revised to reflect the correction of these errors.
The following table presents the effect of the aforementioned
revision on the Company’s assets and liabilities classified
as held for sale as reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as
of December 31, 2016:
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
||
|
As Reported
|
Revision
|
As Revised
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
assets
|
$7,083,870
|
$(696,429)
|
$6,387,441
|
Total
assets of the disposal group classified as held for
sale
|
$10,956,392
|
$(696,429)
|
$10,259,963
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
$2,225,342
|
$(696,429)
|
$1,528,913
|
Total
liabilities of the disposal group classified as held for
sale
|
$4,410,348
|
$(696,429)
|
$3,713,919
|
|
|
|
|
Total
net assets classified as held for sale
|
$6,546,044
|
$-
|
$6,546,044
|
The following tables present the effect of the aforementioned
revisions on the Company’s discontinued operations associated
with CEI and IPSA as reflected in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the year ended December 31, 2016:
|
Year Ended December 31, 201
|
||
|
As Reported
|
Revision
|
As Revised
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
$(7,215,181)
|
$(696,429)
|
$(7,911,610)
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
(10,824,699)
|
(696,429)
|
(11,521,128)
|
Income
tax (expense) benefit
|
(1,045,283)
|
696,429
|
(348,854)
|
Loss
from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
$(11,869,982)
|
$-
|
$(11,869,982)
|
8
In the fourth quarter of 2016, we determined that it would be
appropriate to modify the presentation of certain descriptions
within our Consolidated Statements of Operations to reflect our
change in strategy to evolve into a pure-play cybersecurity company
which provides cybersecurity and business advisory services. We
believe the change does not represent an error in prior
presentations; rather it is consistent with the change in our
strategic focus. Periods presented herein are based on the revised
presentation.
The following table presents the effect of the aforementioned
revisions on our Consolidated Statements of Operations as of March
31, 2016, and also reflects the presentation for discontinued
operations of our IPSA and CEI subsidiaries. See Note 4
“Discontinued Operations.”
|
March 31, 2016
|
||
|
As Previously Presented
|
Adjustments
|
As Revised
|
Cost
of revenues
|
$2,765,518
|
$(2,765,518)
|
$-
|
Direct
cost of revenues
|
$-
|
$2,435,503
|
$2,435,503
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
$2,991,714
|
$330,015
|
$3,321,729
|
Use of Estimates
The
preparation of the Company’s Consolidated unaudited financial
statements, in conformity with GAAP, requires management to make
estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Note 2: Recent accounting pronouncements
In May
2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09,
“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).”
This guidance requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the
transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount
that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be
entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015,
the FASB issued a one-year deferral of the effective date of ASU
2014-09. ASU 2015-14 requires application of ASU 2014-09 for annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early
adoption is permitted as of the original effective date (i.e. for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 16, 2016). The
Company has not yet determined the effect, if any, that the
adoption of this standard will have on the Company’s
financial position or results of operations.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic
842).” ASU 2016-02 requires a dual approach for lessee
accounting under which a lessee would account for leases as finance
leases or operating leases. Both finance leases and operating
leases will result in the lessee recognizing a right-of-use asset
and a corresponding lease liability. For finance leases the lessee
would recognize interest expense and amortization of the
right-of-use asset, and for operating leases the lessee would
recognize a straight-line lease expense. The standard is effective
for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 using a
modified retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. We
are currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2016-02 may have on
our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Stock
Compensation.” ASU 2016-09 identifies areas for
simplification in accounting for share-based payment transactions,
including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as
either equity or liabilities, an option to recognize gross stock
compensation expense with actual forfeitures recognized as they
occur, as well as certain classifications on the statement of cash
flows. The standard was effective for annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual
periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU
2016-09 during the first quarter of 2017. As a result of the
adoption of this standard, in the first quarter of 2017, we
recognized deferred tax assets for the excess tax benefits that
arose directly from tax deductions related to equity compensation
greater than amounts recognized for financial reporting and also
recognized an increase of an equal amount in the valuation
allowance against those deferred tax assets. The adoption did not
have any other material impacts on our consolidated financial
statements.
In
August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash
flows (Topic 230),” which changes how certain cash receipts
and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of
cash flows. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those
fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-15 may have on
its consolidated financial statements and has not elected early
adoption as of the quarter ended March 31, 2017.
9
In
January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,
“Intangible-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) –
Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” ASU 2017-04
simplifies the goodwill impairment test by eliminating the second
step of the current two-step impairment test. ASU 2017-04 is
effective for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests in fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2019 and is applied
prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual
goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January
1, 2017. ASU 2017-04 may affect our financial statements to the
extent that a goodwill impairment test results in impairment
charges.
Since
January 1, 2017, there have been other new accounting
pronouncements and updates to the Accounting Standards
Codification. Each of these updates has been reviewed by Management
who does not believe their adoption has had or will have a material
impact on the Company’s financial position or operating
results.
Note 3: Fair Value Measurements
Summarized
information with respect to certain of the Company’s
financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of March 31, 2017 and December 31,
2016 is as follows:
|
March 31, 2017
|
|||
|
Fair Value
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Derivative
Liability:
|
|
|
|
|
Series
D common stock purchase warrants
|
$94,169
|
$-
|
$94,169
|
$-
|
Qualified
Purchaser common stock purchase warrants and anti-dilution
provisions
|
835,172
|
-
|
-
|
835,172
|
Total
|
$929,341
|
$-
|
$94,169
|
$835,172
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|||
|
Fair Value
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Derivative
Liability:
|
|
|
|
|
Series
D common stock purchase warrants
|
$471,134
|
$-
|
$471,134
|
$-
|
Qualified
Purchaser common stock purchase warrants and anti-dilution
provisions
|
1,220,919
|
-
|
-
|
1,220,919
|
Total
|
$1,692,053
|
$-
|
$471,134
|
$1,220,919
|
The
table below provides a summary of the changes in fair value of
derivative liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2017
and 2016:
|
Level 2 Inputs
|
Level 3 Inputs
|
|
|
|
Derivative liability - Series D Common Stock Purchase
Warrants
|
Total Fair Value Measurements Using Level 2 Inputs
|
Qualified Purchasers from Q1 2016 PIPE Stock Warrants and
Anti-dilution Provision
|
Grand Total Fair Value Measurements Using Both Level 2 and Level 3
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2016
|
$471,134
|
$471,134
|
$1,220,919
|
$1,692,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
unrealized (gains) or losses included in net income
loss
|
(376,965)
|
(376,965)
|
(385,747)
|
(762,712)
|
Initial
fair value of derivative liability issuance
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2017
|
$94,169
|
$94,169
|
$835,172
|
$929,341
|
10
|
Level 2 Inputs
|
Level 3 Inputs
|
|
|||
|
Derivative liability - Common Stock Purchase Warrants
–Promissory Notes
|
Derivative liability - Common Stock Purchase Warrants –
Series D Preferred Stock
|
Derivative liability - Common Stock Purchase Warrants –
Series C Preferred Stock
|
Qualified Purchasers from Q1 2016 PIPE Stock Warrants and
Anti-dilution Provision
|
Grand Total Fair Value Measurements Using Both Level 2 and Level 3
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2015
|
$2,189
|
$2,904,849
|
$2,907,038
|
$633,046
|
$-
|
$3,540,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial
fair value of derivative liability issuance
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
599,228
|
599,228
|
Reclassification
to equity
|
-
|
(429,570)
|
(429,570)
|
(139,922)
|
-
|
(569,492)
|
Unrealized
(gains) losses included in net loss
|
220
|
(767,645)
|
(767,425)
|
(493,124)
|
-
|
(1,260,549)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2016
|
$2,409
|
$1,707,634
|
$1,710,043
|
$-
|
$599,228
|
$2,309,271
|
Series D Common Stock Purchase Warrants
We use
the Black-Scholes option valuation technique (Level 2 inputs) to
value the warrants attached to certain promissory note issuances as
this technique embodies all of the requisite assumptions (including
trading volatility, remaining term to maturity, market price,
strike price, and risk-free rates) necessary to fair value these
instruments. The valuation using the Black-Scholes model does not
differ materially from the valuation using a binomial valuation
technique (such as a Monte Carlo Simulation - Level
3).
Qualified Purchasers
The
Company determined that the warrants and anti-dilution provisions
issued to the Qualified Purchasers as part of the Securities
Purchase Agreement executed on March 10, 2016, should be recorded
as derivative liabilities. However, due to the 9.9% ownership
restrictions at both the execution date and at March 31, 2017, the
warrants to the Qualified Purchasers were not exercisable.
Management has also determined that the likelihood of the Qualified
Purchasers ownership percentage being reduced below the 9.9%
maximum ownership is highly improbable during the term of the
warrants. These factors, along with the probability of a capital
raise triggering additional common share issuances to the Qualified
Purchasers, were key inputs in the Monte Carlo simulation performed
by an independent valuation firm in order to determine the fair
value as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
The key
quantitative assumptions related to the Securities Purchase
Agreement, for the derivative features (warrants)
issued
to the Qualified Purchasers issued March 10, 2016 are as follows as
of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Expected
Life (Years)
|
3.9
|
4.2
|
Risk
Free Rate
|
1.60%
|
1.60%
|
Volatility
|
72.87%
|
75.30%
|
Probability
of a Capital Raise
|
0%-95%
|
5%-95%
|
Note 4: Discontinued operations
In
2016, we announced a strategic shift to evolve into a pure-play
cybersecurity company. In August 2016, our Board of Directors
approved the evaluation of the divestiture of IPSA and the
remaining components of the Energy Solutions businesses. A plan to
divest those business units was approved during 2016. Our Control
Engineering, Inc. (“CEI”) subsidiary was sold on
December 31, 2016 and we sold a portion of our IPSA subsidiary on
April 30, 2017. See Note 13 “Subsequent Events” for
further information.
11
As of
March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016 the assets and liabilities of
IPSA are classified as held for sale in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets and reflect all adjustments considered necessary to
represent fair market value less the costs of disposal. The
operating results for CEI and IPSA are presented as discontinued
operations in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
The
following table represents the components of the results from
discontinued operations associated with CEI and IPSA as reflected
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
(Revised)
2016
|
|
|
|
Net
revenue
|
$2,114,541
|
$5,105,233
|
Direct
cost of revenue
|
1,332,118
|
3,842,811
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
1,162,757
|
1,400,421
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
-
|
342,384
|
Loss
from operations
|
(380,334)
|
(480,383)
|
Loss
on assets held for sale
|
(164,823)
|
-
|
Interest
expense, net
|
(19,572)
|
(20,382)
|
Other
(expenses) income
|
(269,314)
|
53,058
|
Loss before income taxes
|
(834,043)
|
(447,707)
|
Income
tax benefit (expense)
|
62,502
|
(34,755)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
$(771,541)
|
$(482,462)
|
Following is a summary of the assets and liabilities classified as
held for sale as reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in
connection with the sale of CEI and IPSA as
of:
|
March 31,
|
(Revised)
December 31,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Carrying amounts of major classes of assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$442,117
|
$161,847
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
1,192,999
|
2,818,948
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
618,947
|
639,461
|
Goodwill and intangible assets |
6,222,618
|
6,387,441
|
Other
|
169,216
|
252,266
|
Total assets of the disposal group classified as held for
sale
|
$8,645,897
|
$10,259,963
|
|
|
|
Carrying amounts of major classes of liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$1,632,806
|
$1,354,194
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
1,255,691
|
1,528,913
|
Factored
receivables obligation
|
121,501
|
830,812
|
Total liabilities of the disposal group classified as held for
sale
|
$3,009,998
|
$3,713,919
|
|
|
|
Total net assets classified as held for sale
|
$5,635,899
|
$6,546,044
|
12
The
following table represents the components of the results from
discontinued operations associated with the sale of CEI and IPSA as
reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows:
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Significant
operating items:
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
$-
|
$342,384
|
Loss
on assets held for sale
|
$164,823
|
$-
|
Loss
on disposal of property and equipment
|
$21,148
|
$-
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities
|
$865,840
|
$(425,352)
|
|
|
|
Significant
investing items:
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
$-
|
$(168,117)
|
Note
5: Earnings Per Share and Equity
Basic
loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss for the
period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
during the period. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing
net loss available to common stockholders for the period by the
weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares,
such as stock options, warrants and convertible securities
outstanding during the period. Such common equivalent shares have
not been included in the Company’s computation of net loss
per share when their effect would have been anti-dilutive based on
the strike price as compared to the average trading price or due to
the Company’s net losses attributable to common
stockholders.
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Basic:
|
|
|
Numerator
–net (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
$(4,542,803)
|
$(3,237,079)
|
Denominator
– weighted-average shares outstanding
|
6,100,275
|
5,239,400
|
Net
loss per share – Basic
|
$(0.74)
|
$(0.62)
|
Warrants
The
following table represents the warrant activity as of March 31,
2017 and the changes during each period:
|
|
Weighted Average
|
Warrants
|
Shares
|
Exercise Price
|
Outstanding
at December 31, 2015
|
1,724,517
|
$17.40
|
Issued
|
843,896
|
$15.64
|
Exercised
|
(114,169)
|
$14.85
|
Cancelled
|
(118,973)
|
$35.70
|
Outstanding
at December 31, 2016
|
2,335,271
|
$15.90
|
Issued
|
198,092
|
$10.00
|
Exercised
|
-
|
$-
|
Cancelled
|
(43,534)
|
$14.08
|
Outstanding
at March 31, 2017
|
2,489,829
|
$15.34
|
During
the three months ended March 31, 2017, warrants were issued with
Secured Convertible Promissory Notes pursuant to the Securities
Purchase Agreement, and issued in conjunction with the Third
Amendment to the Secured Convertible Promissory Notes. See Note
8 “Long Term
Debt” for additional
information on the
Company’s Secured Convertible Promissory Notes
and related
amendments.
13
Preferred Stock
The
Company has authorized shares of three classes of preferred stock
of which no shares were issued or outstanding at March 31, 2017 and
December 31, 2016. Further detail can be found in Note 13
“Stockholders Equity” under “Part II—Item
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in the
Company’s Annual Report filed with the SEC on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2016.
Note 6: Stock Options
The
Company issued 11,867 stock options for services during the three
months ended March 31, 2017 under the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan.
The Company’s results for the three months ended March 31,
2017 and 2016, include stock based compensation expense of $367,717
and $358,409,
respectively. These amounts are included within selling, general
and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. There were no tax benefits recognized with respect to
that stock based compensation during the three months ended March
31, 2017 or 2016.
The
fair value of the 11,867 stock options granted during the three
months ended March 31, 2017 were estimated using the Black Scholes
option pricing model and using the following weighted-average
assumptions:
Exercise price
|
$6.42 - $10.86
|
Risk free interest rate
|
2.05% - 2.20%
|
Volatility
|
89.38% - 91.80%
|
Expected term
|
5.5 years
|
Dividend yield
|
None
|
The
following table represents the activity under the stock incentive
plan as of March 31, 2017 and the changes during each
period:
|
|
Weighted Average
|
Options
|
Shares
|
Exercise Price
|
Outstanding
at December 31, 2015
|
690,672
|
$15.15
|
Issued
|
571,378
|
$13.08
|
Exercised
|
(46,800)
|
$9.60
|
Forfeitures
|
(167,843)
|
$14.56
|
Outstanding
at December 31, 2016
|
1,047,407
|
$14.18
|
Issued
|
11,867
|
$7.03
|
Exercised
|
-
|
$-
|
Forfeitures
|
(129,246)
|
$18.33
|
Outstanding
at March 31, 2017
|
930,028
|
$13.58
|
Note 7: Notes Payable and Related Party Notes Payable
Between October 23, 2014 and December 31, 2016, we issued
$1,800,000 of 10% Convertible Promissory Notes (the
“Promissory Notes”) and warrants to purchase
approximately 85,000 shares of our common stock (the
“Warrants”) to accredited investors. The Promissory
Notes had an initial term of 12 months, pay interest semi-annually
at 10% per annum and can be voluntarily converted by the holder
into shares of common stock at an exercise price of $16.80 per
share. The Warrants have an exercise price of $16.50 - $16.80 per
share and have an original term of five years. Initially the fair
value of the warrants which qualified for equity classification,
was recorded as a debt discount and credited to Additional Paid-In
Capital. During the second quarter of 2015, $200,000 of the
Promissory Notes were converted to common stock. In April 2016, we
entered into a Note Extension Agreement and we determined that this
transaction constituted a debt extinguishment under ASC 470 and the
$226,380 fair value of the warrants was recorded as a loss on
extinguishment during the year ended December 31, 2016. On
May 21, 2017, the Promissory Notes maturity date was extended from
May 21, 2017 to May 21, 2018, see Note 13 “Subsequent
Events” for additional information. As of March 31, 2017, the balance is classified as
non-current due to the extension. The outstanding amount at March 31, 2017 and
December 31, 2016 was $1,600,000.
14
On August 22, 2016, our Chairman and CEO loaned the Company
$500,000. We issued an unsecured, non-convertible promissory note
in the principal amount of $500,000, bearing interest at 4% per
annum payable on or before August 22, 2017. The Company used the
proceeds to fund working capital requirements and for general
corporate purposes. The outstanding amount at March 31, 2017 and
December 31, 2016 was $500,000.
On February 8, 2017, our Chairman loaned the Company an additional
$245,000. We issued an unsecured, non-convertible, promissory note
in the principal amount of $245,000, bearing interest at the rate
of 4.0% per annum maturing on February 9, 2018. The Company used
the proceeds to fund working capital requirements and for general
corporate purposes.
Note
8:
Long
Term Debt
In
September 2016 the Company entered into an offering of Secured
Convertible Promissory Notes (the “Notes”) with an
aggregate principal amount of up to $10,000,000, along with
warrants to purchase shares (the “Warrant Shares”) of
the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the
“Common Stock”), representing fifty percent (50%)
warrant coverage (the “Warrants”), to certain
accredited investors (the “Investors”), in a private
placement, pursuant to a securities purchase agreement (the
“Agreement”) by and between the Company and each
Investor. The term of each Note is three years after issuance (the
“Maturity Date”). Each Note accrues interest at a rate
of 10% per annum, payable on each March 31, June 30, September 30
and December 31, commencing December 31, 2016 until the earlier of
(i) the entire principal amount being converted or (ii) the
Maturity Date. The interest payments shall be made in either cash
or, at the holder’s option, in shares of Common Stock (the
“Interest Payment Shares”) at a per share price equal
to 85% of the average daily volume weighted average price of the
Common Stock during the five consecutive trading day period
immediately prior to the interest payment date, but in no event
less than $12 per share.
Following
the date which is six months after the date of issuance, at the
election of the holder, all principal and interest due and owing
under each Note is convertible into shares of Common Stock at a
conversion price equal to $12 (the “Conversion Shares”
and, together with the Warrant Shares and the Interest Payment
Shares, the “Shares”). The conversion price is subject
to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, combinations, or
similar events. Pursuant to a security agreement entered into
concurrently with the Investors, the Notes are secured by
substantially all of the Company’s assets, subject to certain
exceptions including the assets related to and held by IPSA. The
Company may prepay any portion of the outstanding principal amount
of any Note and any accrued and unpaid interest, with the prior
written consent of the holder, by paying to the holder an amount
(the “Prepayment Amount”) equal to (i) if the
prepayment date is prior to the first anniversary of the date of
issuance (the “Anniversary Date”), (1) the unpaid
principal to be repaid plus (2) any accrued but unpaid interest
plus (3) an amount equal to the interest which has not accrued as
of the prepayment date but would accrue on the principal to be
repaid during the period beginning on the prepayment date and
ending on the Anniversary Date of the then-outstanding principal
amount of that Note or (ii) if the prepayment date is after the
Anniversary Date, (1) the unpaid principal to be repaid plus
(2) any accrued but unpaid interest plus (3) an amount equal to
one-half of the interest which has not accrued as of the prepayment
date but would accrue on the principal to be repaid during the
period beginning on the prepayment date and ending on the Maturity
Date.
Pursuant
to the terms of both the Notes and the Warrants, a holder may not
issue Shares if, after giving effect to the conversion of the Notes
or exercise of the warrants, as applicable, the holder, together
with its affiliates, would beneficially own in excess of 9.99% of
the outstanding shares of Common Stock. In addition, in the event
the Company consummates a consolidation or merger with or into
another entity or other reorganization event in which the Common
Stock is converted or exchanged for securities, cash or other
property, or the Company sells, assigns, transfers, conveys or
otherwise disposes of all or substantially all of its assets or the
Company (other than the sale, merger or asset sale of IPSA) or
another entity acquires 50% or more of the outstanding Common
Stock, then following such event, (i) at their election within 30
days of consummation of the transaction, the holders of the Notes
will be entitled to receive the Prepayment Amount, and (ii) the
holders of the Warrants will be entitled to receive upon exercise
of such Warrants the same kind and amount of securities, cash or
property which the holders would have received had they exercised
the Warrants immediately prior to such transaction. Any successor
to the Company or surviving entity shall assume the Company’s
obligations under the Notes and the Warrants.
15
With,
or within 30 days after, the consummation of a such a consolidation
or merger, the Company or any Successor Entity, at the
Holder’s option shall purchase or exchange for cash or an
equal amount of securities or property all or any portion of any
related warrants from the Holder, by paying the Holder an amount
equal to the Black Scholes Value of the remaining unexercised
portion of such warrant on the date of such a consolidation or
merger.
On December 22, 2016, the Company entered into an amendment (the
“First Amendment”) to the Agreement that provided the
Noteholders with a one-time option to partially redeem up to 50% of
the Outstanding Amount (as defined in the Agreement) if cash
proceeds received by the Company in connection with the IPSA
transaction exceed certain threshold levels. We do not expect such
proceeds to exceed the threshold levels established.
On January 24, 2017, the Company entered into an amendment (the
“Second Amendment”) to the Agreement which extended the
date by which the last closing under the Agreement must occur from
December 31, 2016 until March 31, 2017.
On March 24, 2017, the Company entered into an amendment (the
“Third Amendment”) to the Agreement which amended each
of Notes and Warrants held by the Noteholders and requires the
Company to comply with new financial covenants, including that the
Company maintain a positive Working Capital (as defined in the
Agreement) as of each month end and average cash on hand at least
equal to the largest payroll during the preceding 90 days (subject
to certain adjustments), and requires the Company to provide
regular financial reports to the Noteholders (Collectively the
“Covenants”). The Third Amendment amends the definition
of conversion price of the Notes from $12.00 per share to $10.00
per share and reduces the per share price floor for any interest
payments made in shares of common stock from $12.00 per share to
$10.00 per share, and amends the exercise price of the Warrants
from $12.00 per share to $10.00 per share.
On March 31, 2017, the Company closed the offering after issuing
Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $8,771,000 (the
“Note Proceeds”), along with Warrants to purchase
approximately 438,550 shares of Common Stock. The Company
determined that the Note Proceeds must be allocated between the
Notes and Warrants, based on the relative fair value of the
Warrants, with the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion
feature of the Notes along with the relative fair value of the
Warrants, being recorded as a debt discount. The Company accounted for the Third Amendment as a modification of debt and
treated the additional value of $580,640 related to the difference
in value of the Warrants and
conversion feature before and after the Third Amendment as
additional debt discount that, along with the unamortized debt
discount on the Notes, will be amortized over the remaining life of
the debt using the effective interest rate
method.
The debt discount balance was $3,744,604 and $2,810,103 as of March
31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, which was recoded as
a reduction in long term debt on the Company’s balance sheet.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company
recognized $225,329 in interest expense associated with this
amortization.
On May
1, 2017, the Covenants were waived through July 31,
2017.
In June 2017, the Company
reached an agreement with the Holders of the Agreement which
requires the Holders consent to amend any terms of the Notes or
Warrants issued pursuant to the Purchase Agreement to be,
individually or in aggregate, more favorable than the existing
terms.
16
Note 9: Balance Sheet information
Certain
amounts included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets
as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consist of the
following:
|
March 31,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
Receivables,
net:
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
$1,104,648
|
$1,664,808
|
Less:
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
(6,848)
|
-
|
|
$1,097,800
|
$1,664,808
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, net:
|
|
|
Office
equipment
|
$863,051
|
$854,530
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
2,108,104
|
2,106,214
|
Computer
software
|
286,226
|
286,226
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
29,183
|
29,183
|
Land
|
181,371
|
181,371
|
Construction
in progress - at cost
|
42,092
|
42,092
|
Less:
Accumulated depreciation
|
(1,249,770)
|
(1,082,160)
|
|
$2,260,257
|
$2,417,456
|
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities:
|
|
|
Accrued
payroll
|
$882,820
|
$949,516
|
Accrued
vacation
|
406,625
|
192,485
|
Other
accrued liabilities
|
486,415
|
758,363
|
|
$1,775,860
|
$1,900,364
|
During
the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 the property and
equipment depreciation expense was $167,609 and $278,319,
respectively.
Note 10: Segment Information
We
define our segments as those operations whose results the chief
operating decision maker (“CODM)” regularly reviews to
analyze performance and allocate resources. We operate in two
business segments: The Cyber Solutions segment and the Business
Advisory Solutions segment. The Cyber Solutions segment provides
cybersecurity and advanced training services, operational support
and consulting services. The Business Advisory Solutions segment
provides advisory and consulting services in the following areas:
risk, data, organizational change and cyber.
We
measure the results of our segments using each segment’s net
revenue and operating income before corporate allocations. Cash,
debt and financing matters are managed centrally and these segments
operate as one from an accounting and overall executive management
perspective. Our CODM does not review asset information and such
information is not considered when analyzing performance or
allocating resources. Although each segment has senior management
in place and they are differentiated from a marketing and customer
presentation perspective, cross-selling opportunities exist and
continue to be pursued.
17
Condensed
summary segment information follows for the three months ended
March 31, 2017 and 2016:
|
Three months ended March 31, 2017
|
||
|
Cyber Solutions
|
Business Advisory Solutions
|
Total
|
Revenue
from Continuing Operations
|
$1,860,530
|
$793,754
|
$2,654,284
|
Income
(Loss) from Continuing Operations before Overhead
|
(2,346,180)
|
61,447
|
(2,284,733)
|
Allocated
Corporate Overhead
|
1,255,835
|
535,774
|
1,791,609
|
Loss
from Continuing Operations
|
$(3,602,015)
|
$(474,327)
|
$(4,076,342)
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2016
|
||
|
Cyber Solutions
|
Business Advisory Solutions
|
Total
|
Revenue
from Continuing Operations
|
$680,820
|
$1,350,573
|
$2,031,393
|
Income
(Loss) from Continuing Operations before Overhead
|
(2,577,587)
|
120,106
|
(2,457,481)
|
Allocated
Corporate Overhead
|
481,276
|
954,730
|
1,436,006
|
Loss
from Continuing Operations
|
$(3,058,863)
|
$(834,624)
|
$(3,893,487)
|
For the
quarter ended March 31, 2017, one customer accounted for 12.5% of
total consolidated revenue. For the quarter ended March 31, 2016,
no individual customer accounted for 10% or more of our total
consolidated revenues.
Note 11: Commitments and Contingencies
The
Company and two senior executives of the Company are named as
defendants (the “Defendants”) in a class action
proceeding filed on June 23, 2015, in the U.S. District Court for
the Central District of California. On September 24, 2015, the U.S.
District Court for the Central District of California granted a
motion to transfer the lawsuit to the United States District Court
for the District of Colorado. On October 14, 2015, the Court
appointed David Hampton as Lead Plaintiff and approved
Hampton’s selection of the law firm Levi & Korsinsky LLP
as Lead Counsel. Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on January 4,
2016. The Amended Complaint alleges violations of the federal
securities laws on behalf of a class of persons who purchased
shares of the Company’s common stock between October 17, 2014
and June 15, 2015. In general, the Amended Complaint alleges that
false or misleading statements were made or that there was a
failure to make appropriate disclosures concerning the
Company’s cyber security business and products. On February
18, 2016, the Company filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s
Amended Complaint. Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion to
dismiss and the Company replied on May 4, 2016. On August 3, 2016,
the U.S. Magistrate Judge issued a recommendation that the Court
grant Plaintiff’s motion to strike certain exhibits from
Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and on August 4, 2016, the
U.S. Magistrate Judge issued a recommendation that the Court grant
in part and deny in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss the
Amended Complaint. On September 21, 2016 the United States District
Court for the District of Colorado dismissed, with prejudice, the
class action suit. On October 21, 2016, Plaintiff filed a notice of
appeal to the decision. On March 8, 2017, the parties completed
their briefing on Plaintiff’s appeal to the Tenth Circuit.
The Tenth Circuit has granted the parties’ request for oral
argument but no date has been scheduled. We cannot predict the
outcome of this appeal; however, the Company believes the appeal
lacks merit. No liability has been recorded in the financial
statements for this matter.
We are
obligated under various operating leases for office space and
equipment.
We had
no other material contractual obligations. We have several
employment contracts in place with key management which are in the
normal course of business.
18
Note 12: Related Party Transactions
The Company hired a shareholder to perform investor relations
services. The total expense related to this vendor was $10,000 for
the three months ended March 31, 2017 and the ending payable
balance was $29,000 as of March 31, 2017.
During October 2016, our root9B LLC CEO became a board member of
one of the Company’s vendors that provides sales and
marketing services. The total expenses related to this vendor and
reflected in the consolidated statements of operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were $55,000 and
$29,000, respectively. We had prepaid expenses of $132,000 at March
31, 2017, and a payable of $150,000 at December 31, 2016,
respectively. As of March 31, 2017, our CEO is no longer
a board member for this vendor company.
Centurion Holdings, of which our Chairman is a majority owner, has
a sublease agreement for a portion of its office in New York with
IPSA. The sublease is at market rates and constitutes IPSA’s
New York Office. The lease expired on December 31, 2016. The base
rent for the sublease is approximately $204,000 per year and the
ending accounts payable balance was $151,000 as of March 31,
2017.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we incurred
$31,000 and $34,000, respectively, in public relations and
marketing expenses from a public relations firm who is also
shareholder. The ending
accounts payable balance was $99,000 and $83,000 as of
March 31,
2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
As of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, we owed members of the
Board of Directors, $192,000 and $171,000, respectively, in fees
for various Board of Director, Audit Committee and Compensation
Committee activities. In May 2017, $155,000 of the outstanding
balance was paid.
On February 8, 2017, our Chairman and CEO loaned the Company an
additional $245,000. We issued an unsecured, non-convertible,
promissory note in the principal amount of $245,000, bearing
interest at the rate of 4.0% per annum maturing on February 9,
2018. The Company used the proceeds to fund working capital
requirements and for general corporate purposes.
On January 25, 2017, our Chairman and CEO purchased secured
convertible notes in the principal amount of $250,000 and warrants
to purchase 12,500 shares of common stock. Interest accrues at 10%
per annum and is payable quarterly.
See Note 7 “Notes Payable and Related Party Notes
Payable” for additional
information on related
party notes payable transactions.
Note 13: Subsequent Events
On
April 30, 2017, the Company sold (i) all of the shares of its
Canadian subsidiary IPSA International, Inc. (“IPSA”),
a wholly owned subsidiary of IPSA International Services, Inc.,
which is a wholly owned U.S. subsidiary of the Company, and (ii)
assets related to the Company’s Hong Kong, London, and Miami
offices (“Affiliate Offices”), pursuant to a Purchase
Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2017 (“Purchase
Agreement”) for $6,000,000. Although there can be no
assurance in this regard, the Company is also eligible to receive
up to $4,000,000 additional consideration under an earn out
arrangement based upon certain performance targets over the next
three years. The sales proceeds were reduced by a working capital
adjustment (the “WCA”), as defined in the Purchase
Agreement, of approximately $1.4 million, and $400,000 was
deposited in escrow to secure potential unrecorded liabilities and
representations of the Company and its affiliates. The WCA will be
finalized within ninety days of the transactions’ close
date.
On May
21, 2017, we entered into convertible promissory note amendments
(the “Note Amendments”) with existing holders (the
“Holders”) of the Company’s unsecured convertible
notes (the “Unsecured Notes”) issued in connection with
the Securities Purchase Agreement, first dated as of October 23,
2014, by and among the Company and the Purchasers identified
therein. The Note Amendments:
1.
Extended the
maturity date by one year from May 21, 2017 to May 21,
2018.
2.
Increased the
interest rate from 10% to 15% per annum.
3.
Converted the
existing semi-annual interest payments (paid in arrears) to
non-refundable semi-annual prepaid interest payments. The first
prepaid interest payment totaling $120,000 was paid on June 8,
2017.
19
4.
Included a
reduction in the price at which the Unsecured Notes may be
voluntarily converted from $16.80 per share (as previously adjusted
to reflect the Company’s one-for-fifteen reverse stock split
on December 1, 2016) to $8.00 per share.
5.
Included a
reduction in the exercise price of the warrants from $16.80 per
share (as previously adjusted to reflect the Company’s
one-for-fifteen reverse stock split on December 1, 2016) to $8.00
per share.
6.
Require repayment
of the Unsecured Notes in the event the Company raises an aggregate
of $16,000,000 or more in capital through the issuance of debt,
equity, or a combination thereof.
The
Qualified Purchasers waived their anti-dilution protection for the
unsecured Note Amendment. In exchange for waiving their
anti-dilution provisions, they received a one year extension of
their warrants.
On May
25, 2017, Joseph Grano Jr., the Company's Chief Executive Officer
stepped down as Chief Executive Officer and was replaced by Mr.
Eric Hipkins. Mr. Grano continues as a director of the Company and
serves as nonexecutive Chairman of the Board following his tenure
as Chief Executive Officer. In connection with this new role the
board of directors approved an annual consulting fee for $120,000.
Additionally, he will receive $8,000 per month as reimbursement for
office space used by the Company and administrative
costs.
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Statements in this Form 10-Q, including the information
incorporated by reference herein, that are not historical in
nature, including those concerning the Company’s current
expectations about its future requirements and needs, are
“forward-looking” statements as defined in
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”) and the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are
identified by words such as “may,”
“should,” “expects,”
“provides,” “anticipates,”
“assumes,” “can,” “meets,”
“could,” “intends,” “might,”
“predicts,” “seeks,” “would,”
“believes,” “estimates,”
“plans” or “continues.” Although we believe
that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements
are reasonable at the time they are made, you are cautioned that
forward-looking information and statements are subject to various
risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and
generally beyond our control. Risks and uncertainties could cause
actual results and developments to differ materially from those
expressed in, or implied or projected by, forward-looking
information and statements provided here or in other disclosures
and presentations. Those risks and uncertainties include, but are
not limited to, the risks listed in Part I – Item 1A of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016. We do not undertake any
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information or
statements.
References
to “we,” “us,” “our,”
“root9B,” and the “Company,” in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q refer to root9B Holdings, Inc.
“SEC” refers to the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
The
following discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting
our results of operations and financial condition for the three
month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (“first quarter
of 2017” and “first quarter of 2016”,
respectively). This discussion should be read in conjunction with,
and is qualified by, the financial statements and the related notes
included in this Report, the financial statements for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2016 (“2016”), and
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) contained in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016.
Discontinued Operations
In the
fourth quarter of 2016, we announced a strategic shift to evolve
into a pure-play cybersecurity company. As a result, we sold our
CEI subsidiary and are actively seeking a buyer for the remaining
components of our IPSA subsidiary. All assets and liabilities
associated of CEI and IPSA are classified as held for sale, with
their results of operations presented as discontinued operations in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements for all periods
presented. As discussed in further detail in Note 4
“Discontinued Operations” to the consolidated financial
statements included in this Report, on April 30, 2017 the Company
sold all the shares of its Canadian subsidiary IPSA International,
Inc. We are in the process of assessing the feasibility and
possible sale prices of the remaining components of our
discontinued operations.
20
Results
of Continuing Operations
Our
results of operations for the first quarter of 2017 and the first
quarter of 2016 are highlighted in the table below and discussed in
the following paragraphs:
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|||
|
2017
|
% of Net Revenue
|
2016
|
% of Net Revenue
|
Net
revenue
|
$2,654,284
|
|
$2,031,393
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of revenues
|
2,383,529
|
89.8%
|
2,435,503
|
119.9%
|
Selling,
general & administrative
|
4,168,750
|
157.1%
|
3,321,729
|
163.5%
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
178,347
|
6.7%
|
167,648
|
8.3%
|
Total
operating expenses
|
6,730,626
|
253.6%
|
5,924,880
|
291.7%
|
Loss
from operations
|
(4,076,342)
|
-153.6%
|
(3,893,487)
|
-191.7%
|
Other
Income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
income (expense)
|
762,712
|
28.7%
|
1,260,549
|
62.1%
|
Interest
expense, net
|
(441,745)
|
-16.6%
|
(76,136)
|
-3.7%
|
Other
income (expense)
|
(15,887)
|
-0.6%
|
13,219
|
0.7%
|
Total
other income (expense)
|
305,080
|
11.5%
|
1,197,632
|
59.0%
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
(3,771,262)
|
-142.1%
|
(2,695,855)
|
-132.7%
|
Income
tax benefit (expense)
|
-
|
0.0%
|
(51,905)
|
-2.6%
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(3,771,262)
|
-142.1%
|
(2,747,760)
|
-135.3%
|
Loss
from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
(771,541)
|
-29.1%
|
(482,462)
|
-23.8%
|
Net
loss
|
(4,542,803)
|
-171.1%
|
(3,230,222)
|
-159.0%
|
Preferred
stock dividends
|
-
|
0.0%
|
(6,857)
|
-0.3%
|
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$(4,542,803)
|
-171.1%
|
$(3,237,079)
|
-159.4%
|
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2017 to the three
months ended March 31, 2016
The
results of operations described below include the Cyber Solutions
(“CS”) and Business Advisory Solutions
(“BAS”) segments for the quarters ended March 31, 2017
and 2016 and does not include results from discontinued
operations.
Net Revenue
Total
revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 was $2,654,000 as
compared to $2,031,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2016, a net
increase of $623,000, or 31%. Revenue by segment was as
follows:
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||
|
2017
|
2016
|
% Growth (Decline)
|
|
|
|
|
Cyber
Solutions
|
$1,860,530
|
$680,820
|
173.3%
|
Business
Advisory Solutions
|
793,754
|
1,350,573
|
-41.2%
|
Total
Net Revenue
|
$2,654,284
|
$2,031,393
|
30.7%
|
21
Cyber Solutions Segment
Revenue
for the CS segment for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 increased
$1,180,000, or 173.3%, compared to the quarter ended March 31,
2016. This increase is attributable to an $887,000, or 171%
increase in Cyber operations revenue, and a $292,000, or 180%
increase in training revenue compared to the quarter ended March
31, 2016. The increase in Cyber operations and training revenue
reflects the results of our expanded sales efforts and our
continued enhancement of our product offerings.
Business Advisory Solutions Segment
Revenue
for the BAS segment for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 decreased
$557,000 or 41.2% compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2016.
This decline was attributable to reduced focus on certain service
lines and regions, and the impact of projects that were active and
completed in 2016 which were not offset by revenue from new
customers in the quarter ended March 31, 2017.
Direct Cost of Revenue
Cyber Solutions Segment
Direct
costs for the CS segment, which includes all costs for billable
staff and materials, increased by $388,000, or 28.2%, for the
quarter ended March 31, 2017 compared to the quarter ended March
31, 2016. This increase is primarily attributable to personnel
related expenses as we expand our workforce in this
segment.
Business Advisory Solutions Segment
Direct costs for the BAS segment, which includes all costs for
billable staff decreased by $440,000, or 41.6%, for the quarter
ended March 31, 2017 compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2016.
As a percentage of revenue, direct costs were 77.8% and 78.3% for
the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The
reduction in expenditures for billable staff accounts for the
decrease and directly correlates with the decline in
revenue.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling,
general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses
increased $847,000, or 25.5%, to $4,169,000, in the quarter ended
March 31, 2017 from $3,322,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2016.
We account for and manage expenses as those directly related to a
business segment and corporate overhead expenses which includes
executive compensation, back office functions, such as finance,
legal, human resources, and other administrative costs. Expenses
related to these groups are discussed below.
Cyber Solutions Segment
SG&A
expenses in the CS segment were $2,276,000 in the quarter ended
March 31, 2017 compared to $1,722,000 in the quarter ended March
31, 2016, an increase of $554,000, primarily attributable to
increases in labor costs ($319,000) and software research and
development ($227,000). Labor costs and software research and
development costs increased as we continue to invest in and build
out CS resources and expertise as we position this segment for
future growth.
Business Advisory Solutions Segment
SG&A
expenses in the BAS segment decreased to $114,000 in the quarter
ended March 31, 2017 from $178,000 in the quarter ended March 31,
2016, a decrease of $64,000 or 35.9%. The decrease is attributable
to reduced rent due to the termination of two leases in California
in 2016, reduced overhead labor costs, and travel related costs.
BAS segment SG&A expenses as a percentage of segment revenue
was 14.4% and 13.2% for the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
22
Corporate Overhead
Corporate
overhead SG&A expenses increased to $1,778,000 in the quarter
ended March 31, 2017, from $1,428,000 in the quarter ended March
31, 2016, an increase of $350,000 or 24.5%. The increase in
corporate level overhead expenses is primarily due to increased
legal and other professional fees ($263,000), employee wages and
benefits ($55,000), and travel ($29,000). The increase in legal and
other professional fees is primarily attributable to services
related to the sale of IPSA and convertible promissory note
amendments.
Other Income (Expense)
Other
income (expense) for the first quarter of 2017 resulted in income
of $305,000 as compared to other income of $1,198,000 in the first
quarter of 2016. The main components of the decrease in other
income is the non-cash derivative
income decrease of $498,000, increase in interest expense of
$366,000, and increase in other expenses of
$29,000.
The
change in derivative income for the first quarter of 2017 compared
to the first quarter of 2016 relates to the change in fair value of
our financial instruments recorded as derivative liabilities and
marked to market.
The
increase in interest expense for the first quarter of 2017 compared
to the first quarter of 2016 was primarily due to interest expense
on our convertible promissory notes, which we started to issue in
September 2016 and completed in March 2017.
Income
Tax Benefit (Expense)
No
income tax provision was recorded for the three months ended March
31, 2017. The Company has experienced operating losses in recent
periods, and a full valuation allowance has been established for
deferred tax assets based on a “more likely than not”
threshold. The ability to realize deferred tax assets depends on
our ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the carry
forward periods provided in the tax law.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting policies generally accepted in the United States of
America. Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based on these financial statements. The
preparation of these financial statements requires the application
of accounting policies in addition to certain estimates and
judgments by our management. Our estimates and judgments are based
on currently available information, historical results and other
assumptions we believe are reasonable. Actual results could differ
from these estimates.
The
Company’s significant accounting policies are outlined in the
Company’s Annual Report filed with the SEC on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2016.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See
Note 2: "Recent Accounting Pronouncements" in the notes to our
unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this Form 10-Q.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources
and Uses of Cash
Our
principal sources of liquidity are cash on hand, cash generated
from operations and funds from external borrowings and equity
issuances.
As of
March 31, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $1,372,028 from
continuing operations and $442,117 from discontinued operations or
a total of $1,814,145, compared to $1,445,028 from continuing operations and
$161,847 from discontinued
operations, or a total of $1,606,875 at December 31, 2016. We had a
decrease in cash from continuing operations of $73,000 between
December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2017, and an increase in cash from
all operations of $207,270 between December 31, 2016 and March 31,
2017. The increase in cash from all operations was primarily
attributable to proceeds from convertible debt and related party
notes payable of $3,245,000, offset by the net cash used in operations and investing
activities during the three months ended March 31, 2017 of
$3,010,402. As of March 31, 2017, our deficit was
$92,116,930.
23
Selling
a portion of our IPSA subsidiary on April 30, 2017 provided
approximately $4 million of net proceeds. See Note 13
“Subsequent Events” for further
information.
On May
21, 2017, $1,600,000 of our unsecured convertible promissory notes
due on May 21, 2017 were extended to May 21, 2018. See Note 13
“Subsequent Events” for further
information.
The following table represents our most liquid assets:
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$1,372,028
|
$1,455,028
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
1,097,800
|
1,664,808
|
Investment
in cost method investee
|
100,000
|
100,000
|
|
$2,569,828
|
$3,219,836
|
During 2016, we incurred substantial costs in our efforts to grow
the Cyber Solutions business segment. We hired additional
personnel, engaged in strategic marketing and brand-building
efforts, built-out the Adversary Pursuit Center (“APC”)
and other new offices opened, incurred legal fees related to
trademarks and patents, and engaged in extensive research and
development projects to enhance the Orkos and HUNT software
platforms. These investments in the Cyber Solutions segment were
made in anticipation of revenue growth during 2017, of which, there
can be no assurance.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we continue to incur
significant labor costs, software research and development, and
advertising expenses as we continue to invest in and build out CS
resources and expertise as we position this segment for future
growth. We have not been able to secure enough Cyber Solutions
contracts to support our continuing operations, and we anticipate
requiring additional capital to grow our Cyber Solutions business
segment, fund operating expenses, and make principal and interest
payments on our promissory note obligations.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain such
financing, or if obtained, on favorable terms. In the event that we
are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt
financing, we may be required to delay, reduce or severely curtail
our operations or the implementation of our business strategies or
otherwise impede our on-going business efforts, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, operating results,
financial condition and long-term prospects.
The trading price of our common stock, or the continued incurrence
of losses could make it more difficult for us to obtain financing
through the issuance of equity or debt securities. If we issue
additional equity or debt securities, stockholders will likely
experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may
have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing
holders of our common stock.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming
that we will continue as a going concern for at least the next 12
months following the issuance of our financial statements; however,
the above conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not
include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on
the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and
classifications of liabilities that may result should we be unable
to continue as a going concern.
24
Working Capital
Working capital, which includes discontinued operations and net
assets classified as held for sale, was $3,752,220 and $3,714,617
as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, which
represents an increase of $37,603. The increase resulted primarily
from a decrease in notes payable of $1,600,000 and net increase in
other assets of $143,746. The increase was offset by a decrease in
discontinued operations assets and liabilities classified as held
for sale of $910,145, a decrease in accounts receivable of $567,008
and net increase in other liabilities of $228,990.
Long-Term Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Our long-term debt was $5,026,396 and $2,960,897 as of March 31,
2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, an increase of
$2,065,499. The increase resulted from the issuance of convertible
debt instruments providing $3,000,000 in cash proceeds, offset by
non-cash debt discount of $579,189, as well as non-cash debt
discount of $580,640 related to the difference in value of the
Warrants and conversion feature before and after the Third
Amendment. Also increased by non-cash debt discount amortization of
$225,328. See Note 8 “Long-Term Debt” for further
information.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
None.
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
The
Company’s primary market risk exposures consist of interest
rate risk associated with borrowings. Management believes that
interest rate fluctuations will not have a material impact on the
Company’s results of operations.
Equity Market Risks
The
trading price of our common stock has been and is likely to
continue to be volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations.
Such fluctuations could impact our decision or ability to utilize
the equity markets as a potential source of our funding needs in
the future.
We have
experienced substantial and continuing losses from operations.
These are the result of increased gross margin pressure and
increases in selling, general and administrative expenses incurred
in preparation for growth. We expect that our cyber security
operations will increase revenues and help move the Company to
profitability from operations, of which there can be no
assurance.
We will
need to obtain additional financing in 2017 to support our future
operations and there can be no assurance that we will be able to
obtain financing, or if obtained, on terms favorable to the
Company. Failure to obtain the same will adversely affect the
operations of the Company.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Pursuant
to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, the Company carried out
an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s
management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the
period covered by this Report. Based upon that evaluation, the
Company’s management concluded that the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the
reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act,
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s
management to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
25
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over
financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f)
promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or
under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive
and principal financial officers and effected by the
Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and includes
those policies and procedures that:
●
Pertain to the
maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of
the Company;
●
Provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America and
that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and
●
Provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
The
matters involving internal controls and procedures that our
management considered to be material weaknesses were:
1.
In
preparation for our first quarter 10Q filing for the three months
ended March 31, 2017, we discovered certain errors related to the
financial statements included in the 2016 annual form 10K filed on
April 17, 2017. As detailed more fully in Note 1 of the Form 10Q
filing, the Company determined that the errors were not material to
any of the Company’s prior annual financial statements and
accordingly, revised its previously-issued consolidated financial
statements for 2016 and disclosed the effects in the footnotes
thereto.
2.
The
Company financial statements include complex transactions and
financial instruments that are subject to extensive technical
accounting standards. The Company does not have adequate internal
or external resources with sufficient technical knowledge to
properly account for such transactions.
3.
Timely
reporting of financial results with appropriate recognition of
required revenue and expense accruals.
4.
Inadequate
consolidating financial statements to support segment reporting
requirements.
5.
Inadequate
processes, staffing and procedures to meet external financial
reporting requirements and disclosures.
The errors arising from the underlying deficiencies are not
material to the financial statements reported in any interim or
annual period and therefore, did not result in a revision to
previously filed financial statements. However, these control
deficiencies could result in misstatements of the aforementioned
accounts and disclosures that would result in a material
misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial
statements that would not be prevented or detected in a timely
manner. Accordingly, we have determined that these control
deficiencies constitute a material weakness. Because of these
material weaknesses, management concluded that we did not maintain
effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,
2017 based on criteria described in Internal Control –
Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
Remediation
of the Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
We are
evaluating the material weaknesses and are engaged in the planning
for and implementation of remediation efforts to strengthen our
overall internal control. The remediation plan will include the
following actions:
●
Hire sufficient
competent staff to analyze and report financial transactions in
compliance with GAAP in a timely manner.
●
Engage sufficient
competent external experts to assist with complex financial
transactions as needed.
●
Consolidate the
accounting teams to one geographical location and standardize close
procedures and account reconciliations.
●
Combine and enhance
financial reporting systems.
●
Enhance controls
related to revenue recognition.
26
We are
committed to improving our internal control environment and believe
that these remediation efforts will represent significant
improvements in our controls. We have started to implement these
steps, however, some of these steps will take time to be fully
integrated and confirmed to be effective and sustainable.
Additional controls may also be required over time. Until the
remediation steps set forth above are fully implemented and tested,
the material weakness described above will continue to exist.
Management believes that these additional controls will remediate
the material weakness discussed above; however, no assurance can be
given that these changes will remediate the material weakness until
such time that the controls have operated for a sufficient period
of time and their operating effectiveness has been
tested.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
have been no other significant changes in our internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect those controls
subsequent to the period covered by this report.
Further,
subsequent to the period covered by the report, management plans to
implement measures to remediate the material weaknesses in internal
controls over financial reporting described above to the extent
sufficient capital is available to do so. As the business
increases, the Company is seeking to hire additional accounting
professionals and it will continue its efforts to create an
effective system of disclosure controls and procedures for
financial reporting.
The
Company is not required by current SEC rules to include, and does
not include, an auditor's attestation report regarding the
Company’s internal control systems over financial reporting.
Accordingly, the Company's registered public accounting firm has
not attested to Management's reports on the Company's internal
control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our
management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our
disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over
financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all
fraud. A control system, regardless of how well conceived and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that
the objectives of the control system will be met. These inherent
limitations include the following:
●
Judgments in
decision-making can be faulty, and control and process breakdowns
can occur because of simple errors or mistakes.
●
Controls can be
circumvented by individuals, acting alone or in collusion with each
other, or by management override.
●
The design of any
system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about
the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that
any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all
potential future conditions.
●
Over time, controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or
deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or
procedures.
Because
of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation
of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.
27
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
The
Company and two senior executives of the Company are named as
defendants (the “Defendants”) in a class action
proceeding filed on June 23, 2015, in the U.S. District Court for
the Central District of California. On September 24, 2015, the U.S.
District Court for the Central District of California granted a
motion to transfer the lawsuit to the United States District Court
for the District of Colorado. On October 14, 2015, the Court
appointed David Hampton as Lead Plaintiff and approved
Hampton’s selection of the law firm Levi & Korsinsky LLP
as Lead Counsel. Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on January 4,
2016. The Amended Complaint alleges violations of the federal
securities laws on behalf of a class of persons who purchased
shares of the Company’s common stock between October 17, 2014
and June 15, 2015. In general, the Amended Complaint alleges that
false or misleading statements were made or that there was a
failure to make appropriate disclosures concerning the
Company’s cyber security business and products. On February
18, 2016, the Company filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s
Amended Complaint. Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion to
dismiss and the Company replied on May 4, 2016. On August 3, 2016,
the U.S. Magistrate Judge issued a recommendation that the Court
grant Plaintiff’s motion to strike certain exhibits from
Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and on August 4, 2016, the
U.S. Magistrate Judge issued a recommendation that the Court grant
in part and deny in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss the
Amended Complaint. On September 21, 2016, the United States
District Court for the District of Colorado dismissed, with
prejudice, the class action suit. On October 21, 2016, Plaintiff
filed a notice of appeal to the decision. On March 8, 2017, the
parties completed their briefing on Plaintiff’s appeal to the
Tenth Circuit. The Tenth Circuit has granted the parties’
request for oral argument but no date has been scheduled. We cannot
predict the outcome of this appeal; however, the Company believes
the appeal lacks merit. No liability has been recorded in the
financial statements for this matter.
Item 2
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
Other
than those previously reported on Form 8-K, no unregistered
securities were sold or issued during the period ended March 31,
2017.
Item 3
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not
Applicable.
Item 5.
Other Information
On May
25, 2017, Joseph Grano Jr., the Company's Chief Executive Officer
stepped down as Chief Executive Officer and was replaced by Mr.
Eric Hipkins. Mr. Grano continues as a director of the Company and
serves as nonexecutive Chairman of the Board following his tenure
as Chief Executive Officer. In connection with this new role
the board of directors approved an annual consulting fee for
$120,000. Additionally, he will receive $8,000 per month as
reimbursement for office space used by the Company and
administrative costs.
Item 6. Exhibits
No.
|
Description
|
10.1
|
Second
Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement, effective January 24,
2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed with the Commission on
January 26, 2017).
|
|
|
10.2*
|
Third
Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement, effective March 24,
2017.
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
Second
Form of Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed with the Commission
on March 24, 2017).
|
|
|
28
10.5
|
Form of
Amendment No. 2 to Secured Convertible Promissory Note
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K of the Company filed with the Commission on March 24,
2017).
|
|
|
10.6*
|
Third
Form of Secured Convertible Promissory Note.
|
|
|
10.7*
|
First
Amendment to Promissory Note, dated as of February 8, 2017, by and
between the Company and Joseph J. Grano, Jr.
|
|
|
10.8*
|
Non-Executive
Chairman of the Board Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2017, by and
between the Company and Joseph J. Grano, Jr.
|
|
|
31.1*
|
Certification
of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a).
|
|
|
31.2*
|
Certification
of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a).
|
|
|
32.1**
|
Written
Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).
|
|
|
32.2**
|
Written
Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).
|
|
|
101.INS**
|
XBRL
Instance Document.
|
|
|
101.SCH**
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
|
|
101.CAL**
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
101.DEF**
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
101.LAB**
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
101.PRE**
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
*
Filed
herewith.
**
Furnished
herewith.
29
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the
registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
ROOT9B
HOLDINGS INC.
|
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
DATE:
July 6, 2017
|
By:
|
/s/
Eric Hipkins
|
|
|
|
Eric
Hipkins
|
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
DATE:
July 6, 2017
|
By:
|
/s/
William L. Hoke
|
|
|
|
William
L. Hoke
|
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
30