Attached files

file filename
EX-21 - EX-21 - T Bancshares, Inc.ex21.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - T Bancshares, Inc.ex32-1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - T Bancshares, Inc.ex31-2.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - T Bancshares, Inc.ex31-1.htm
EX-23 - EX-23 - T Bancshares, Inc.ex23.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 

 
FORM 10−K
 

☒ ANNUAL REPORT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________to ___________.

Commission File Number: 000-51297

T Bancshares, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Texas

 

71-0919962

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

 

 

 

16200 Dallas Parkway, Suite 190, Dallas, Texas 75248

 

(972) 720-9000

(Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.01

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐   No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐  No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒  No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to Form 10-K. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
 

Large accelerated filer ☐

Accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☐

Smaller reporting company ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐  No ☒

As of June 30, 2016, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates was $23.2 million.

The number of common shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 4,051,657 shares of the Company’s Common Stock ($0.01 par value per share) were outstanding as of March 29, 2017.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Specified portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to the registrant’s 2017Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which is to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


TABLE OF CONTENTS
 

 

 

 

PART I

 

3

 

Item 1. Business

4

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

16

 

Item 2. Properties

23

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

24

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

24

 

 

 

PART II

 

25

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

25

 

Item 6. Select Financial Data

25

 

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

25

 

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

42

 

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

43

 

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

77

 

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

77

 

Item 9B. Other Information

77

 

 

 

PART III

 

78

 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

78

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation

78

 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

78

 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

79

 

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

79

 

 

 

PART IV

 

80

 

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

80

 

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

80

PART I

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Form 10-K”) contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). When used in this Form 10-K, words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “predict,” “project,” and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to our management. Actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited, to those listed in “Item 1A-Risk Factors” and the following:

 
 
general economic conditions, including our local, state and national real estate markets and employment trends;
 
 
volatility and disruption in national and international financial markets;      
 
 
government intervention in the U. S. financial system including the effects of recent legislative, tax, accounting and regulatory actions and reforms, such as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Basel III Rules;
 
 
political instability;               
 
 
the ability of the Federal government to deal with any slowdown of the national economy and the fiscal cliff;  
 
 
competition from other financial institutions and financial holding companies;    
 
 
the effects of and changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”);
 
 
changes in the demand for loans;             
 
 
fluctuations in the value of collateral securing our loan portfolio and in the level of the allowance for loan losses;
 
 
the accuracy of our estimates of future loan losses;         
 
 
the accuracy of our estimates and assumptions regarding the performance of our securities portfolio;  
 
 
soundness of other financial institutions with which we have transactions;    
 
 
inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations;       
 
 
changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;      
 
 
our ability to attract deposits;              
 
 
changes in our liquidity position;             
 
 
changes in the reliability of our vendors, internal control system or information systems;  
 
 
our ability to attract and retain qualified employees;         
 
 
consequences of continued bank mergers and acquisitions in our market area, resulting in fewer but much larger and stronger competitors;
 
 
expansion of our operations, including branch openings, new product offerings and expansion into new markets;
 
 
changes in our compensation and benefit plans; and            
 
 
natural disasters and adverse weather, acts of terrorism, an outbreak of hostilities or other international or domestic calamities, and other matters beyond our control.
 
 
Such statements reflect the current views of our management with respect to future events and are subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, growth strategy and liquidity. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this paragraph. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
 

Item 1.

Business.

General

T Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas on December 23, 2002 to serve as the bank holding company for T Bank, N.A., a national association (the “Bank”), which opened on November 2, 2004. The Bank operates through a main office located at 16200 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, Texas. Other than its ownership of the Bank, the Company conducts no material business.

The Bank is a full-service commercial bank offering a broad range of commercial and consumer banking services to small- to medium-sized businesses, single-family residential and commercial contractors and consumers. Lending services include commercial loans to small to medium-sized businesses and professional concerns as well as consumers. The Bank offers a wide range of deposit services including demand deposits, regular savings accounts, money market accounts, individual retirement accounts, and certificates of deposit with fixed rates and a range of maturity options. The Bank also offers wealth management and trust services. These services are provided through a variety of delivery systems including automated teller machines, mobile banking and Internet banking.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had, on a consolidated basis, approximately $213.1 million in assets, $158.7 million in total loans and $174.7 million in deposits.

Definitive Agreement with Tectonic Acquisition, Inc.

On November 10, 2016, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with T Acquisition, Inc. (“Parent”), and joined in by Tectonic Advisors, LLC (“Tectonic”), pursuant to which Parent will acquire the Company through the merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company surviving the Merger.

In connection with the Merger, holders of the Company’s common stock will be entitled to receive an amount in cash consisting of two payments that, based on the Company’s Adjusted Equity (as defined in the Merger Agreement) at December 31, 2016, would have totaled approximately $10.3036 per share:

·
Special Dividend.  The first payment is a special dividend to be paid by The Company to each holder of record of common stock as of a date just prior to closing in an amount by which the Company’s Adjusted Equity as of a date just prior to closing exceeds $20,000,000.  Based on the Company’s estimated, unaudited shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2016, the special dividend would have equaled approximately $2.2761 per share. The special dividend will increase (or decrease) based on the Company’s net income (or net losses) from December 31, 2016 to a date just prior to closing.

·
Per Share Merger Consideration. The second payment is the per share merger consideration to be paid by Parent for each share of T Bancshares common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effect time of the Merger equal to approximately $8.0275 per share, subject to adjustment.

 
The Merger was approved by shareholders of the Company on March 10, 2017 and is subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals.

The Merger is currently expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2017.

Market Area

Our principal banking markets include Dallas, Tarrant, Denton, Collin and Rockwall counties which encompass an area commonly referred to as the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. We currently operate through a main office located at 16200 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, Texas. We also serve on a national scale certain niche markets that include loans to dentists and small business lending under programs through the U.S. Small Business Administration and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Competition

The market for financial services is rapidly changing and intensely competitive and is likely to become more competitive as the number and types of market entrants increases. The Bank competes in both lending and attracting funds with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, consumer finance companies, pension trusts, mutual funds, insurance companies, mortgage bankers and brokers, brokerage and investment banking firms, asset-based nonbank lenders, government agencies and certain other non-financial institutions, including retail stores, which may offer more favorable financing alternatives than the Bank.

Lending Services

Lending Policy

We offer a full range of lending products, including commercial loans to small- to medium-sized businesses and professional concerns, real estate loans and consumer loans. We compete for these loans with competitors who are well established in our primary market area and have greater resources and lending limits. As a result, we currently offer more flexible pricing and terms to attract borrowers.

The Bank’s delegations of authority, which are approved by the Board of Directors, provide for various levels of officer lending authority. The Bank has an independent review that evaluates the quality of loans on a periodic basis and determines if loans are originated in accordance with the guidelines established by the Board of Directors. Additionally, our Board of Directors has formed a Directors’ Loan Committee with members determined by board resolution to provide the following oversight:

 
·
ensure compliance with loan policy, procedures and guidelines as well as appropriate regulatory requirements;
 
·
approve loans with net bank exposure over $2,000,000;
 
·
monitor delinquent, non-accrual loans and classified loans;  
 
·
monitor loan portfolio concentrations and quality through a variety of metrics;
 
·
monitor our loan servicing and review systems; and  
 
·
review the adequacy of the loan loss reserve. 

We follow a conservative lending policy, but one which we believe permits prudent risks to assist businesses and consumers in our lending market. Interest rates vary depending on our cost of funds, the loan maturity, the degree of risk and other loan terms. The Bank does not make any loans to any of its directors, executive officers or their affiliates.

Lending Limits

The Bank’s lending activities are subject to a variety of lending limits. Differing limits apply based on the type of loan or the nature of the borrower, including the borrower’s relationship to the Bank. In general, however, the Bank is able to loan any one borrower a maximum amount equal to either:

 
·
15% of the Bank’s capital and surplus and allowance for loan losses; or
 
·
25% of its capital and surplus and allowance for loan losses if the amount that exceeds 15% is secured by cash or readily marketable collateral, as determined by reliable and continuously available price quotations; or
 
·
any amount when the loan is fully secured by a segregated deposit at the Bank and the Bank has perfected its security interest in the deposit.

These legal limits will increase or decrease as the Bank’s capital increases or decreases as a result of its earnings or losses, among other reasons. 

Credit Risks

The principal economic risk associated with each category of loans that the Bank makes is the creditworthiness of the borrower. Borrower creditworthiness is affected by general economic conditions and the strength of the relevant business market segment. General economic factors affecting a borrower’s ability to repay include interest, inflation and employment rates, as well as other factors affecting a borrower’s customers, suppliers and employees. The well-established financial institutions in our primary service area currently make proportionately more loans to medium- to large-sized businesses than the Bank. Many of the Bank’s anticipated commercial loans will likely be made to small- to medium-sized businesses that may be less able to withstand competitive, economic and financial pressures than larger borrowers.

Commercial and Industrial Loans

Loans for commercial purposes in various lines of businesses are a major component of the Bank’s loan portfolio. The targets in the commercial loan markets are retail establishments, professional service providers, in particular dentists, and small-to-medium-sized businesses. The terms of these loans vary by purpose and by type of underlying collateral, if any. The commercial loans primarily are underwritten on the basis of the borrower’s ability to service the loan from income and their creditworthiness. The Bank will typically make equipment loans for a term of ten years or less at fixed or variable rates, with the loan fully amortized over the term. Loans to support working capital will typically have terms not exceeding one year and will usually be secured by accounts receivable, inventory or personal guarantees of the principals of the business. For loans secured by accounts receivable or inventory, principal will typically be repaid as the assets securing the loan are converted into cash, and for loans secured with other types of collateral, principal will typically be repaid over the term of the loan or due at maturity.

Commercial lending generally involves greater credit risk than residential mortgage or consumer lending, and involves risks that are different from those associated with commercial real estate lending. Although commercial loans may be collateralized by equipment or other business assets, the liquidation of collateral in the event of a borrower default may represent an insufficient source of repayment because equipment and other business assets may, among other things, be obsolete or of limited use. Accordingly, the repayment of a commercial loan depends primarily on the creditworthiness and projected cash flow of the borrower (and any guarantors), while liquidation of collateral is considered a secondary source of repayment. On some of these loans, the Bank takes a security interest in real estate as a prudent practice and measure and not as the principal collateral for the loan.

Real Estate Loans

The Bank makes owner occupied and non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, residential and commercial construction and development loans, and residential real estate loans.

 
·
Commercial real estate. Commercial real estate loan terms generally are limited to 25 years or less. Interest rates may be fixed or adjustable, although rates typically are not fixed for loans with maturity dates exceeding 10 years. The Bank generally requires personal guarantees from the principal owners of the property supported by a review by the Bank’s management of the principal owners’ personal financial statements. Risks associated with commercial real estate loans include fluctuations in the value of real estate, tenant vacancy rates and the quality of the borrower’s management.
 
 
·
Construction and development loans. We make construction and development loans on owner occupied real estate, pre-sold or leased, and speculative basis. If the borrower has entered into an agreement to sell or lease the property prior to beginning construction, then the loan is considered to be pre-sold or leased. If the borrower has not entered into an agreement to sell or lease the property prior to beginning construction, then the loan is considered to be speculative. Construction and development loans are generally made with a 12 to 18 months and interest is paid monthly. The ratio of the loan principal to the value of the collateral as established by independent appraisal typically will not exceed industry standards and applicable regulations. Speculative loans are based on the borrower’s financial strength and cash flow position. Loan proceeds will be disbursed based on the percentage of completion and only after the project has been inspected by an experienced construction lender or third-party inspector. Risks associated with construction loans include, without limitation, fluctuations in the value of real estate, the financial condition of the buyer on a presold basis and of the borrower on a speculative basis, and the ability of the borrower and/or the borrower’s contractor(s) to complete the project timely and within the estimated budget.
 
 
·
Residential real estate. The Bank’s residential real estate loans consist of loans to acquire and renovate existing homes for subsequent re-sale, residential new construction loans, residential loans purchased in the secondary market, residential rental properties, and on a limited basis, traditional mortgage lending for one-to-four family owner occupied property. All loans are made in accordance with the Bank’s appraisal and loan policy with the ratio of the loan principal to the value of collateral as established by independent appraisal generally not exceeding 80%. We believe these loan-to-value ratios are sufficient to compensate for fluctuations in real estate market value and to minimize losses that could result from a downturn in the residential real estate market.

Government Enhanced Small Business Lending

The Bank originates and services commercial and real estate loans under programs guaranteed by the U.S. Small Business Administration and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The principal balance of these loans is generally guaranteed 75% by these agencies. These loans generally offer borrowers more flexible terms and conditions not available for conventional commercial loans. Examples of more flexible terms include longer amortization periods, lower required down payments, and less borrower operating history. These loans are generally secured by equipment, real estate, and other tangible collateral. Loan-to-value ratios may, in some instances, be higher than conventional loans. Loans secured by business assets that do not include real estate have terms that are generally ten years or less and are fully amortizing. Loans secured by real estate as the principal collateral are generally twenty five years or less and are also fully amortizing. Most loans are adjustable rate loans but may be fixed for the term of the loan. Repayment of the loans is based on an analysis of the borrower’s ability to generate sufficient income from operations. This analysis may rely more heavily on projected future earnings than on conventional loans. The Bank also analyzes the industry sector to determine the feasibility of the projected income.

There is an active secondary market for the guaranteed portion of these loans. Because the guaranteed portion carries the full faith and credit guarantee of the U.S. Government, the lower investor required yield on that portion of the loan generally creates a premium at the time of the sale.

Consumer Installment Loans

On a limited basis, the Bank makes loans to individuals for personal, family and household purposes, including secured and unsecured installment and term loans. These loans are typically to the principals and employees of our business customers. Repayment of consumer loans depends upon the borrower’s financial stability and is more likely to be adversely affected by divorce, job loss, illness and personal hardships than repayment of other loans. Because many consumer loans are secured by depreciable assets such as boats, cars and trailers, the loan should be amortized over the useful life of the asset. The loan officer will review the borrower’s past credit history, past income level, debt history and, when applicable, cash flow and determine the impact of all these factors on the ability of the borrower to make future payments as agreed. The principal competitors for consumer loans are the established banks and finance companies in our market.

Portfolio Composition

The following table sets forth the composition of the Bank’s loan portfolio at December 31, 2016. Loan balances do not include undisbursed loan proceeds, unearned income, sold guaranteed portions of loans held for sale, or allowance for loan losses.

 

 

Portfolio Percentage
at
December 31, 2016

 

Commercial and industrial

   

51

%

Real Estate – residential

   

4

%

Real Estate - commercial

   

12

%

Real Estate – construction

   

4

%

SBA 7a

   

19

%

SBA 504

   

6

%

USDA

   

2

%

Consumer installment

   

2

%

 

   

100

%

Investments

The Bank invests a portion of its assets in U.S. Treasuries, U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, direct obligations of quasi government agencies including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Bank, Property Assessed Clean Energy assets and federal funds sold. No investment in any of those instruments exceeds any applicable limitation imposed by law or regulation. The Bank’s investments are managed in relation to loan demand and deposit growth, and are generally used to provide for the investment of excess funds at minimal risks while providing liquidity to fund increases in loan demand or to offset deposit fluctuations. The Bank’s Asset-Liability Committee reviews the investment portfolio on an ongoing basis in order to ensure that the investments conform to the Bank’s policy as set by the Board of Directors.

Deposit Services

Deposits are the major source of the Bank’s funds for lending and other investment activities. Additionally, we also generate funds from loan principal repayments and prepayments. Scheduled loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are influenced significantly by general interest rates and market conditions. The Bank considers the majority of its regular savings, demand, NOW, and money market deposit accounts to be core deposits. These accounts comprised approximately 55% of the Bank’s total deposits at December 31, 2016. The Bank’s remaining deposits were composed of time deposits less than $100,000, which comprised 2% of total deposits, and time deposits of $100,000 and greater, which comprised approximately 43% of total deposits at December 31, 2016. The Bank believes it is very competitive in the types of accounts and interest rates we offer on deposit accounts, in particular money market accounts and time deposits. We actively solicit these deposits through personal solicitation by our officers and directors, through deposit referral services, and through our Internet banking strategy.

Trust Services

The Bank offers traditional fiduciary services, such as serving as executor, trustee, agent, administrator or custodian for individuals, nonprofit organizations, employee benefit plans and organizations. The Bank’s trust department works with our customers and their financial advisors to define objectives, goals and strategies for their investment portfolios and tailor their investment portfolios accordingly. As of December 31, 2016, the Bank had approximately $1.2 billion in trust assets under management.

Other Banking Services

Other banking services currently offered or anticipated include cashier’s checks, travelers’ checks, direct deposit of payroll and Social Security payments, bank-by-mail, remote check deposits, automated teller machine cards and debit cards. The Bank offers full service personal and business internet banking which includes remote deposit for both consumers and businesses, bill payment, electronic transfer of funds between financial institutions, as well as traditional internet services such as balance inquiries and internal funds transfers. The Bank provides a courier and mobile banking concierge service throughout the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex and offers its customers free usage of any automated teller machine in the world through its debit card.

Employees

The success of the Bank depends, in significant part, on its ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified management and other personnel, for whom competition is intense. The Bank currently has 42 full-time equivalent employees. None of the Bank’s employees are represented by a collective bargaining agreement. The Bank believes that its relations with its employees are good.

Other Available Information

We file or furnish with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and other reports required by Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site at www.sec.gov that contains our reports, proxy statements, and other information that we file electronically with the SEC.

In addition, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and other reports required by Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available through our Internet website, www.tbank.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Our Internet website and the information contained on or accessible through our website are not intended to be incorporated into this Form 10-K.

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

General

Set forth below is a description of the significant elements of the laws and regulations applicable to the Company and the Bank. The description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the statutes, regulations and policies that are described. Moreover, notwithstanding the recent presidential election, these statutes, regulations and policies are continually under review by the U.S. Congress and state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to the Company or its principal subsidiary, the Bank, could have a material effect on our business.

Regulatory Agencies

As a registered bank holding company, the Company is subject to the supervision and regulation of the Federal Reserve and, acting under delegated authority, the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (the “Reserve Bank”) pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “Bank Holding Company Act”). As a national bank, the Bank is subject to the supervision and regulation of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “Comptroller”).

Bank Holding Company Regulation

Bank Holding Company Act. As a registered bank holding company, the Company is required to furnish to the Federal Reserve annual and quarterly reports of its operations and may also be required to furnish such additional information and reports as the Federal Reserve or the Reserve Bank may require.

Under the Bank Holding Company Act, the Company must obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve or, acting under delegated authority, the Reserve Bank before (1) acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of any class of voting securities of any bank or bank holding company if, after the acquisition, the Company would directly or indirectly own or control 5% or more of the class; (2) acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company; or (3) merging or consolidating with another bank holding company.

Under the Bank Holding Company Act, any company must obtain approval of the Federal Reserve prior to acquiring control of the Company or the Bank. For purposes of the Bank Holding Company Act, “control” is defined as ownership of 25% or more of any class of voting securities of the Company or the Bank, the ability to control the election of a majority of the directors, or the exercise of a controlling influence over management or policies of the Company or the Bank.

Change in Bank Control Act. The Change in Bank Control Act of 1978, as amended (the “Change in Bank Control Act”), and the related regulations of the Federal Reserve require any person or groups of persons acting in concert (except for companies required to make application under the Bank Holding Company Act), to file a written notice with the Federal Reserve or, acting under delegated authority, the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank, before the person or group acquires control of the Company. The Change in Bank Control Act defines “control” as the direct or indirect power to vote 25% or more of any class of voting securities or to direct the management or policies of a bank holding company or an insured bank. A rebuttable presumption of control arises under the Change in Bank Control Act where a person or group controls 10% or more, but less than 25%, of a class of the voting stock of a company or insured bank which is a reporting company under the Exchange Act, such as the Company, or such ownership interest is greater than the ownership interest held by any other person or group.

Permitted Activities. The Bank Holding Company Act also limits the investments and activities of bank holding companies. In general, a bank holding company is prohibited from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of a company that is not a bank or a bank holding company or from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, providing services for its subsidiaries, and various non-bank activities that are deemed to be closely related to banking. The activities of the Company are subject to these legal and regulatory limitations under the Bank Holding Company Act and the implementing regulations of the Federal Reserve.

A bank holding company may also elect to become a “financial holding company,” by which a qualified parent holding company of a banking institution may engage, directly or through its non-bank subsidiaries, in any activity that is financial in nature or incidental to such financial activity or in any other activity that is complementary to a financial activity and does not pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally. A bank holding company will be able to successfully elect to be regulated as a financial holding company if all of its depository institution subsidiaries meet certain prescribed standards pertaining to management, capital adequacy and compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, as amended (the “Community Reinvestment Act”), such as being “well-capitalized” and “well-managed,” and must have a Community Reinvestment Act rating of at least “satisfactory.” Financial holding companies remain subject to regulation and oversight by the Federal Reserve. The Company believes that the Bank, which is the Company’s sole depository institution subsidiary, presently satisfies all of the requirements that must be met to enable the Company to successfully elect to become a financial holding company. However, the Company has no current intention of seeking to become a financial holding company. Such a course of action may become necessary or appropriate at some time in the future depending upon the Company’s strategic plan.

Source of Strength. Under the Federal Reserve’s “source of strength” doctrine, a bank holding company is required to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to any subsidiary bank. The holding company is expected to commit resources to support a subsidiary bank, including at times when the holding company may not be in a financial position to provide such support. A bank holding company’s failure to meet its source-of-strength obligations may constitute an unsafe and unsound practice or a violation of the Federal Reserve’s regulations, or both. The source-of-strength doctrine most directly affects bank holding companies in situations where the bank holding company’s subsidiary bank fails to maintain adequate capital levels. This doctrine was codified by the Dodd-Frank Act, but the Federal Reserve has not yet adopted regulations to implement this requirement.

Sound banking practice. The Federal Reserve also has the power to order a bank holding company to terminate any activity or investment, or to terminate its ownership or control of any subsidiary, when it has reasonable cause to believe that the continuation of such activity or investment or such ownership or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness, or stability of any subsidiary bank of the bank holding company.

Bank holding companies are not permitted to engage in unsound banking practices. For example, the Federal Reserve’s Regulation Y requires a bank holding company to give the Federal Reserve prior notice of any redemption or repurchase of its own equity securities, if the consideration to be paid, together with the consideration paid for any repurchases in the preceding year, is equal to 10% or more of the company’s consolidated net worth. There is an exception for bank holding companies that are well-managed, well capitalized, and not subject to any unresolved supervisory issues. The Federal Reserve may oppose the transaction if it believes that the transaction would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any law or regulation. As another example, a holding company could not impair its subsidiary bank’s soundness by causing it to make funds available to non-banking subsidiaries or their customers if the Federal Reserve believed it not prudent to do so.

The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”) expanded the Federal Reserve’s authority to prohibit activities of bank holding companies and their non-banking subsidiaries which represent unsafe and unsound banking practices or which constitute violations of laws or regulations. FIRREA increased the amount of civil money penalties which the Federal Reserve can assess for activities conducted on a knowing and reckless basis, if those activities caused a substantial loss to a depository institution. The penalties can be as high as $1.0 million for each day the activity continues. FIRREA also expanded the scope of individuals and entities against which such penalties may be assessed.

Dividends. Consistent with its policy that bank holding companies should serve as a source of financial strength for their subsidiary banks, the Federal Reserve has stated that, as a matter of prudent banking, a bank holding company generally should not maintain a rate of distributions to shareholders unless its available net income has been sufficient to fully fund the distributions, and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the bank holding company’s capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition. In addition, we are subject to certain restrictions on the making of distributions as a result of the requirement that the Bank maintain an adequate level of capital as described below. As a Texas corporation, we are restricted under the Texas Business Organizations Code from paying dividends under certain conditions. Under Texas law, we cannot pay dividends to shareholders if the dividends exceed our surplus or if after giving effect to the dividends, we would be insolvent.

Anti-tying restrictions. Bank holding companies and affiliates are prohibited from tying the provision of services, such as extensions of credit, to other services offered by a holding company or its affiliates.

Bank Regulation

Federal and state laws and regulations that govern banks have the effect of, among other things, regulating the scope of business, investments, cash reserves, the purpose and nature of loans, the maximum interest rate chargeable on loans, the amount of dividends declared, and required capitalization ratios.

National Banking Associations. Banks organized as national banking associations under the National Bank Act are subject to regulation and examination by the Comptroller. The supervision and regulation by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC” or “Comptroller”) of banks is primarily intended to protect the interests of depositors. The National Bank Act:

 
·
requires each national banking association to maintain reserves against deposits,
 
·
restricts the nature and amount of loans that may be made and the interest that may be charged, and
 
·
restricts investments and other activities.

Deposit Insurance. The FDIC insures the deposits of federally insured banks, such as the Bank, and thrifts, up to prescribed statutory limits for each depositor through the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) and safeguards the safety and soundness of the banking and thrift industries. The Dodd-Frank Act set the standard maximum deposit insurance amount to $250,000. The amount of FDIC assessments paid by each insured depository institution is based on its relative risk of default as measured by regulatory capital ratios and other supervisory factors. In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC insurance premium is based on an institution’s total assets minus its Tier 1 capital.

In October 2010, the FDIC adopted a new DIF restoration plan to ensure that the fund reserve ratio reaches 1.35% by September 30, 2020, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. In August 2016, the FDIC announced that the DIF reserve ratio had surpassed 1.15% as of June 30, 2016. As a result, beginning in the third quarter of 2016, the range of initial assessment ranges for all institutions were adjusted downward. After the effect of potential base-rate adjustments, the total base assessment rate was reduced for insured institutions of less than $10 billion in total assets to a range of 1.5 to 30 basis points on an annualized basis. This adjustment resulted in a slightly lower cost for the Bank in 2016.

At least semi-annually, the FDIC will update its loss and income projections for the DIF and, if needed, will increase or decrease assessment rates, following notice-and-comment rulemaking, if required. If there are additional bank or financial institution failures or if the FDIC otherwise determines to increase assessment rates, the Bank may be required to pay higher FDIC insurance premiums.

Under the FDIA, the FDIC may terminate deposit insurance upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe and unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC.

Payment of Dividends. The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank. The Company receives most of its revenue from dividends paid to the Company by the Bank. Described below are some of the laws and regulations that apply when the Bank pays or paid dividends.

National banks are required by federal law to obtain the prior approval of the OCC to declare and pay dividends if the total of all dividends declared in any calendar year would exceed the total of (1) such bank’s net profits (as defined and interpreted by regulation) for that year plus (2) its retained net profits (as defined and interpreted by regulation) for the preceding two calendar years, less any required transfers to surplus. In addition, these banks may only pay dividends to the extent that retained net profits (including the portion transferred to surplus) exceed bad debts (as defined by regulation).

To pay dividends, the Bank must maintain adequate capital above regulatory guidelines. In addition, if the applicable regulatory authority believes that a bank under its jurisdiction is engaged in, or is about to engage in, an unsafe or unsound practice (which, depending on the financial condition of the bank, could include the payment of dividends), the regulatory authorities may require, after notice and hearing, that such bank cease and desist from the unsafe practice. The FDIC and the OCC have each indicated paying dividends that deplete a bank’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsafe and unsound banking practice. The Federal Reserve, the Comptroller and the FDIC have issued policy statements that recommend that bank holding companies and insured banks should generally only pay dividends to the extent net income is sufficient to cover both cash dividends and a rate of earnings retention consistent with capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. No undercapitalized institution may pay a dividend.

Capital Requirements

The federal banking agencies have adopted risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies and banks that are expected to provide a measure of capital that reflects the degree of risk associated with a banking organization’s operations for both transactions reported on the balance sheet as assets, such as loans, and those recorded as off-balance sheet items, such as commitments, letters of credit and recourse arrangements. The risk based guidelines apply on a consolidated basis to bank holding companies with consolidated assets of $1.0 billion or more. Under these capital guidelines, banking organizations are required to maintain certain minimum capital ratios, which are obtained by dividing its qualifying capital by its total risk-adjusted assets and off-balance sheet items. In general, the dollar amounts of assets and certain off-balance sheet items are “risk-adjusted” and assigned to various risk categories. In addition to such risk adjusted capital requirements, banking organizations are also required to maintain an additional minimum “leverage” capital ratio, which is calculated on the basis of average total assets without any adjustment for risk being made to the value of the assets. Qualifying capital is classified depending on the type of capital as follows:

 
·
“Tier 1 capital” consists of common equity, retained earnings, qualifying non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, a limited amount of qualifying cumulative perpetual preferred stock and minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill and certain other intangible assets. In determining bank holding company compliance with holding company level capital requirements, qualifying Tier 1 capital may count trust preferred securities, subject to certain criteria and quantitative limits for inclusion of restricted core capital elements in Tier 1 capital provided that the bank holding company has total assets of less than $15.0 billion and such trust preferred securities were issued before May 19, 2010;
 
 
·
“Tier 2 capital” includes, among other things, hybrid capital instruments, perpetual debt, mandatory convertible debt securities, qualifying term subordinated debt, preferred stock that does not qualify as Tier 1 capital, and a limited amount of allowance for loan and lease losses; and
 
 
·
“Tier 3 capital” consists of qualifying unsecured subordinated debt.

Pursuant to federal regulations, banks and bank holding companies, with more than $1 billion in consolidated assets, must maintain capital levels commensurate with the level of risk to which they are exposed, including the volume and severity of problem loans. The federal banking agencies may change existing capital guidelines or adopt new capital guidelines in the future and have required many banks and bank holding companies subject to enforcement actions to maintain capital ratios in excess of the minimum ratios otherwise required to be deemed well capitalized, in which case the affected institution may no longer be deemed well capitalized and may be subject to restrictions on various activities, including a bank’s ability to accept or renew brokered deposits.

On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve, and on July 9, 2013, the FDIC and OCC, adopted a final rule that implements the Basel III changes to the international regulatory capital framework, referred to as the “Basel III Rules.” The Basel III Rules apply to both depository institutions and (subject to certain exceptions not applicable to the Company) their holding companies. Although parts of the Basel III Rules apply only to large, complex financial institutions, substantial portions of the Basel III Rules apply to the Company and our subsidiary bank. The Basel III Rules include requirements contemplated by the Dodd-Frank Act as well as certain standards initially adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2010.

The Basel III Rules include higher risk-based and leverage capital ratio requirements and redefine what constitutes “capital” for purposes of calculating those ratios. Among the most important changes are stricter eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments that would disallow the inclusion of instruments, such as trust preferred securities (other than grandfathered trust preferred securities such as those issued by the Company), in Tier 1 capital going forward and new constraints on the inclusion of minority interests, mortgage-servicing assets, deferred tax assets and certain investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions. The Basel III Rules also introduced a common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) risk-based capital ratio. CET1 capital consists of retained earnings and common stock instruments, subject to certain adjustments. In addition, the rule requires that most regulatory capital deductions be made from CET1 capital.

The Basel III Rules also establish a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5% above the new regulatory minimum risk-based capital requirements. The conservation buffer, when added to the capital requirements, results in the following minimum ratios: (i) a common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 7.0%, (ii) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.5%, and (iii) a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.5%. The implementation of the capital conservation buffer began on January 1, 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and will increase by that amount each subsequent January 1 until fully implemented on January 1, 2019. An institution would be subject to limitations on certain activities including payment of dividends, share repurchases and discretionary bonuses to executive officers if its capital level is below the buffered ratio.

The Basel III minimum capital ratio requirements as applicable to the Company and the Bank after the full phase-in period are summarized in the table below.

 

 

BASEL III
Minimum for
Capital
Adequacy
Requirements

   
BASEL III
Additional
Capital
Conservation
Buffer
   
BASEL III
Ratio with
Capital
Conservation
Buffer
 

Total Risk Based Capital (total capital to risk weighted assets)

   

8.0

%

   

2.5

%

   

10.5

%

Tier 1 Risk Based Capital (tier 1 to risk weighted assets)

   

6.0

%

   

2.5

%

   

8.5

%

Tier 1 Leverage Ratio (tier 1 to average assets)

   

4.0

%

   

-

%

   

4.0

%

Common Equity Tier 1 Risk Based (CET1 to risk weighted assets)

   

4.5

%

   

2.5

%

   

7.0

%

The Basel III Rules also revise the prompt corrective action framework, which is designed to place restrictions on insured depository institutions, including our subsidiary bank, if their capital levels do not meet certain thresholds. These revisions were effective January 1, 2015. The prompt correction action rules now include the CET1 capital component and increase certain other capital requirements for the various thresholds. As of January 1, 2015, insured depository institutions are required to meet the following capital levels in order to qualify as “well capitalized:” (i) a Total risk-based capital ratio of 10%(unchanged from current rules); (ii) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8% (increased from 6%); (iii) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5% (unchanged from current rules); and (iv) a CET1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.5%. Accordingly, a financial institution may be considered “well capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework, but not satisfy the fully phased-in Basel III capital ratios. As of December 31, 2016, the Company’s regulatory capital ratios and those of the Bank are in excess of the levels established for “well capitalized” institutions under the Basel III Rules.

The Federal Reserve may also set higher capital requirements for holding companies whose circumstances warrant it. For example, holding companies experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions are expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels, without significant reliance on intangible assets. The bank regulatory agencies could impose higher capital requirements to meet “well-capitalized” standards and any future regulatory change could impose higher capital standards as a routine matter.

The Basel III Rules set forth certain changes in the methods of calculating certain risk-weighted assets, which affects the calculation of risk-based ratios. Under the Basel III Rules, higher or more sensitive risk weights are assigned to various categories of assets, including, certain credit facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property, certain exposures or credits that are 90 days past due or on non-accrual, foreign exposures and certain corporate exposures. In addition, these Rules include greater recognition of collateral and guarantees and revised capital treatment for derivatives and repo-style transactions.

Prompt Corrective Action

The federal banking agencies have issued regulations pursuant to the FDIA defining five categories in which an insured depository institution will be placed, based on the level of its capital ratios: well-capitalized, adequately-capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized. A bank that may otherwise meet the minimum requirements to be classified as well-capitalized, adequately capitalized, or undercapitalized may be treated instead as though it were in the next lower capital category if the appropriate federal banking agency, after notice and opportunity for hearing, determines that an unsafe or unsound condition, or an unsafe or unsound practice, warrants such treatment. Under the prompt corrective action regulations, a bank that is deemed to be undercapitalized or in a lesser capital category will be required to submit to its primary federal banking regulator a capital restoration plan and to comply with the plan. The Basel III Rules revise the prompt corrective action framework. See “Capital Requirements” above.

Any bank holding company that controls a subsidiary bank that has been required to submit a capital restoration plan will be required to provide assurances of compliance by the bank with the capital restoration plan, subject to limitations on the bank holding company’s aggregate liability in connection with providing such required assurances. Failure to restore capital under a capital restoration plan can result in the bank being placed into receivership if it becomes critically undercapitalized. A bank subject to prompt corrective action also may affect its parent holding company in other ways. These include possible restrictions or prohibitions on dividends or subordinated debt payments to the parent holding company by the bank, as well as limitations on other transactions between the bank and the parent holding company. In addition, the Federal Reserve may impose restrictions on the ability of the bank holding company itself to pay dividends, or require divestiture of holding company affiliates that pose a significant risk to the subsidiary bank, or require divestiture of the undercapitalized subsidiary bank. At each successive lower capital category, an insured bank may be subject to increased operating restrictions by its primary federal banking regulator.

Interstate Banking and Branching

Effective June 1, 1997, the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 amended the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and certain other statutes to permit state and national banks with different home states to merge across state lines, with approval of the appropriate federal banking agency, unless the home state of a participating bank had passed legislation prior to May 31, 1997 expressly prohibiting interstate mergers. Under the Riegle-Neal Act amendments, once a state or national bank has established branches in a state, that bank may establish and acquire additional branches at any location in the state at which any bank involved in the interstate merger transaction could have established or acquired branches under applicable federal or state law. If a state opts out of interstate branching within the specified time period, no bank in any other state may establish a branch in the state which has opted out, whether through an acquisition or de novo.

However, under the Dodd-Frank Act, the national branching requirements have been relaxed and national banks and state banks are able to establish branches in any state if that state would permit the establishment of the branch by a state bank chartered in that state. The Comptroller accepts applications for interstate merger and branching transactions, subject to certain limitations on ages of the banks to be acquired and the total amount of deposits within the state a bank or financial holding company may control. Since our primary service area is Texas, we do not expect that the ability to operate in other states will have any material impact on our growth strategy. We may, however, face increased competition from out-of-state banks that branch or make acquisitions in our primary markets in Texas.

Community Reinvestment Act

The Community Reinvestment Act requires that, in connection with examinations of financial institutions within its jurisdiction, the FDIC and the Commissioner is to evaluate the record of each financial institution in meeting the credit needs of its local community, including low and moderate-income neighborhoods. These facts are also considered in evaluating mergers, acquisitions, and applications to open a branch or facility. Failure to adequately meet these criteria could impose additional requirements and limitations on us. Additionally, the Bank must publicly disclose the terms of various Community Reinvestment Act-related agreements. The Bank received a rating of “satisfactory” on its most recent Community Reinvestment Act examination.

Restrictions on Transactions with Affiliates and Loans to Insiders

The Bank is subject to the provisions of Section 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act(the “Affiliates Act”), as such provisions are made applicable to state non-member banks by Section 18(i) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. Affiliates of a bank include, among other entities, the bank’s holding company and companies that are under common control with the bank.

These provisions place limits on the amount of:

 
·
loans or extensions of credit to affiliates;
 
·
investment in affiliates;
 
·
assets that may be purchase from affiliates, except for real and personal property exempted by the Federal Reserve;
 
·
the amount of loans or extensions of credit to third parties collateralized by the securities or obligations of affiliates; and
 
·
the guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit issued on behalf of an affiliate.

The total amount of the above transactions is limited in amount, as to any one affiliate, to 10% of the Bank’s capital and surplus and, as to all affiliates combined, to 20% of its capital and surplus. In addition to the limitation on the amount of these transactions, each of the above transactions must also meet specified collateral requirements. The Bank must also comply with other provisions designed to avoid the purchase or acquisition of low-quality assets from affiliates. The Dodd-Frank Act expanded the scope of Section 23A, which now includes investment funds managed by an institution as an affiliate, as well as other procedural and substantive hurdles.

The Bank is also subject to Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act which, among other things, prohibits the Bank from engaging in any transaction with an affiliate unless the transaction is on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the Bank or its subsidiaries, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with nonaffiliated companies.

Under federal law, the Bank is also subject to restrictions on extensions of credit to its executive officers, directors, principal shareholders and their related interests. These extensions of credit (1) must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with third parties, (2) must follow credit underwriting procedures at least as stringent as those applicable to comparable transactions with third parties, and (3) must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. The Dodd-Frank Act expanded coverage of transactions with insiders by including credit exposure arising from derivative transactions (which are also covered by the expansion of Section 23A). The Dodd-Frank Act prohibits an insured depository institution from purchasing or selling an asset to an executive officer, director, or principal shareholder (or any related interest of such a person) unless the transaction is on market terms, and, if the transaction exceeds 10% of the institution’s capital, it is approved in advance by a majority of the disinterested directors.

Concentrated Commercial Real Estate Lending Regulations

The federal banking agencies, including the Comptroller have promulgated guidance governing financial institutions with concentrations in commercial real estate lending. The guidance provides that a bank has a concentration in commercial real estate lending if (i) total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land represent 100% or more of total capital or (ii) total reported loans secured by multifamily and non-farm nonresidential properties (excluding loans secured by owner-occupied properties) and loans for construction, land development, and other land represent 300% or more of total capital and the bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months. If a concentration is present, management must employ heightened risk management practices that address the following key elements: including board and management oversight and strategic planning, portfolio management, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing, and maintenance of increased capital levels as needed to support the level of commercial real estate lending. On December 18, 2015, the federal banking agencies jointly issued a “Statement on Prudent Risk Management for Commercial Real Estate Lending”. As of December 31, 2016, the Company did not exceed the levels to be considered to have a concentration in commercial real estate lending and believes its credit administration to be consistent with the recently published policy statement.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) was created under the Dodd-Frank Act to centralize responsibility for consumer financial protection with broad rulemaking, supervision and enforcement authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that would apply to all banks and thrifts, including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Truth-in Lending Act (“TILA”), Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), Fair Credit Reporting Act, Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, Truth in Savings Act, Fair Debt Collection Act, the Consumer Financial Privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and certain other statutes. Banking institutions with total assets of $10.0 billion or less, such as the Bank, remain subject to the supervision and enforcement of their primary federal banking regulator with respect to the federal consumer financial protection laws and such additional regulations as may be adopted by the CFPB.

Technology Risk Management and Consumer Privacy

State and federal banking regulators have issued various policy statements emphasizing the importance of technology risk management and supervision in evaluating the safety and soundness of depository institutions with respect to banks that contract with outside vendors to provide data processing and core banking functions. The use of technology-related products, services, delivery channels and processes exposes a bank to various risks, particularly operational, privacy, security, strategic, reputation and compliance risk. Banks are generally expected to prudently manage technology-related risks as part of their comprehensive risk management policies by identifying, measuring, monitoring and controlling risks associated with the use of technology.

Under Section 501 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the federal banking agencies have established appropriate standards for financial institutions regarding the implementation of safeguards to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer records and information, protection against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such records and protection against unauthorized access to or use of such records or information in a way that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to a customer. Among other matters, the rules require each bank to implement a comprehensive written information security program that includes administrative, technical and physical safeguards relating to customer information.

Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, a financial institution must also provide its customers with a notice of privacy policies and practices. Section 502 prohibits a financial institution from disclosing nonpublic personal information about a customer to nonaffiliated third parties unless the institution satisfies various notice and opt-out requirements and the customer has not elected to opt out of the disclosure. Under Section 504, the agencies are authorized to issue regulations as necessary to implement notice requirements and restrictions on a financial institution’s ability to disclose nonpublic personal information about customers to nonaffiliated third parties. Under the final rule the regulators adopted, all banks must develop initial and annual privacy notices which describe in general terms the bank’s information sharing practices. Banks that share nonpublic personal information about customers with nonaffiliated third parties must also provide customers with an opt-out notice and a reasonable period of time for the customer to opt out of any such disclosure (with certain exceptions). Limitations are placed on the extent to which a bank can disclose an account number or access code for credit card, deposit or transaction accounts to any nonaffiliated third party for use in marketing.

Other Operations and Consumer Compliance Laws

The Bank must comply with numerous federal anti-money laundering and consumer protection statutes and implement regulations, including but not limited to the Truth in Savings Act, Electronic Funds Transfer Act, Expedited Funds Availability Act, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, the Bank Secrecy Act, the Community Reinvestment Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the National Flood Insurance Act and various other federal and state privacy protection laws. On May 10, 2016, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network issued a final rule regarding customer due diligence requirements for covered financial institutions in connection with their Bank Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering policies. The final rule adds a requirement to understand the nature and purpose of customer relationships and identify the “beneficial owner” of legal entity customers. The formal implementation date is May 11, 2018. Failure to comply in any material respect with any of these laws could subject the Bank to lawsuits and could also result in administrative penalties, including fines and reimbursements. The Company and the Bank are also subject to federal and state laws prohibiting unfair or fraudulent business practices, untrue or misleading advertising and unfair competition. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with customers when taking deposits, making loans, collecting loans, and providing other services. Failure to comply in any material respect with any of these laws and regulations could subject the Bank to various penalties, including but not limited to enforcement actions, injunctions, fines or criminal penalties, punitive damages to consumers, and the loss of certain contractual rights.

Regulation Z. On April 5, 2011, the Federal Reserve’s Final Rule on Loan Originator Compensation and Steering (Regulation Z) became final. Regulation Z is more commonly known as regulation that implements the Truth in Lending Act. Regulation Z address two components of mortgage lending, i.e., loans secured by a dwelling, and implements restrictions and guidelines for: (a) prohibited payments to loan originators and (b) prohibitions on steering. Under Regulation Z, a creditor is prohibited from paying, directly or indirectly, compensation to a mortgage broker or any other loan originator that is based on a mortgage transaction’s terms or conditions, except the amount of credit extended, which is deemed not to be a transaction term or condition. In addition, Regulation Z prohibits a loan originator from “steering” a consumer to a lender or a loan that offers less favorable terms in order to increase the loan originator’s compensation, unless the loan is in the consumer’s interest. Regulation Z also contains a record-retention provision requiring that, for each transaction subject to Regulation Z, the financial institution must maintain records of the compensation it provided to the loan originator for that transaction as well as the compensation agreement in effect on the date the interest rate was set for the transaction. These records must be maintained for two years.

UDAP and UDAAP. Recently, banking regulatory agencies have increasingly used a general consumer protection statute to address “unethical” or otherwise “bad” business practices that may not necessarily fall directly under the purview of a specific banking or consumer finance law. The law of choice for enforcement against such business practices has been Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act—the primary federal law that prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce (“UDAP” or “FTC Act”). “Unjustified consumer injury” is the principal focus of the FTC Act. Prior to the Dodd-Frank Act, there was little formal guidance to provide insight to the parameters for compliance with the UDAP law. However, the UDAP provisions have been expanded under the Dodd-Frank Act to apply to “unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices” (“UDAAP”), which has been delegated to the CFPB for supervision. The CFPB has published its first Supervision and Examination Manual that addresses compliance with and the examination of UDAAP.

Other regulation. The Bank’s operations are also subject to various federal and state laws such as:

 
·
the federal Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;
 
·
the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves;
 
·
the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors in extending credit;
 
·
the Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1978 and its amendment, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies;
 
·
the Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies;
 
·
the rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing these federal laws;
 
·
the Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records; and
 
·
the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E issued by the Federal Reserve to implement that act, which govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services.
 
 
Regulatory Reform and Legislation

From time to time, various legislative and regulatory initiatives are introduced in Congress and state legislatures, as well as by regulatory agencies. Such initiatives may include proposals to expand or contract the powers of bank holding companies and depository institutions or proposals to substantially change the financial institution regulatory system. Such legislation could change banking statutes and the operating environment of the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways. If enacted, such legislation could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions, and other financial institutions. The Company cannot predict whether any such legislation will be enacted, and, if enacted, the effect that it, or any implementing regulations, would have on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to the Company or our subsidiaries could have a material effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Effect of governmental monetary policies.

The commercial banking business is affected not only by general economic conditions but also by the fiscal and monetary policies of the Federal Reserve. Some of the instruments of fiscal and monetary policy available to the Federal Reserve include changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowings, the fluctuating availability of borrowings at the “discount window,” open market operations, the imposition of and changes in reserve requirements against member banks’ deposits and assets of foreign branches, the imposition of and changes in reserve requirements against certain borrowings by banks and their affiliates, and the placing of limits on interest rates that member banks may pay on time and savings deposits. Such policies influence to a significant extent the overall growth of bank loans, investments, and deposits and the interest rates charged on loans or paid on time and savings deposits. We cannot predict the nature of future fiscal and monetary policies and the effect of such policies on the future business and our earnings.

All of the above laws and regulations add significantly to the cost of operating the Bank and thus have a negative impact on our profitability. It should also be noted that there has been a tremendous expansion experienced in recent years by certain financial service providers that are not subject to the same rules and regulations as the Company or the Bank. These institutions, because they are not so highly regulated, have a competitive advantage over us and may continue to draw large amounts of funds away from traditional banking institutions, with a continuing adverse effect on the banking industry in general.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

An investment in our common stock involves certain risks. You should carefully consider the following risk factors and all other information contained in this Form 10-K. The risks and uncertainties described below may not be the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial also may impair our business. If any of the events described in the following risk factors occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. The value or market price of our common stock could decline due to any of these identified or other risks, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Our allowance for loan loss may not be sufficient to absorb actual losses.

Experience in the banking industry indicates that a portion of our loans in all categories of our lending business will become delinquent, and some may only be partially repaid or may never be repaid at all. Our methodology for establishing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses depends on subjective application of risk grades as indicators of borrowers’ ability to repay. Deterioration in general economic conditions and unforeseen risks affecting customers may have an adverse effect on borrowers’ capacity to repay timely their obligations before risk grades could reflect those changing conditions. In times of improving credit quality, with growth in our loan portfolio, the allowance for loan losses may decrease as a percent of total loans. Changes in economic and market conditions may increase the risk that the allowance would become inadequate if borrowers experience economic and other conditions adverse to their businesses. Maintaining the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses may require that we make significant and unanticipated increases in our provisions for loan losses, which would materially affect our results of operations and capital adequacy. Recognizing that many of our loans individually represent a significant percentage of our total allowance for loan losses, adverse collection experience in a relatively small number of loans could require an increase in our allowance.

Federal regulators, as an integral part of their respective supervisory functions, periodically review our allowance for loan losses. The regulatory agencies may require us to change classifications or grades on loans, increase the allowance for loan losses with large provisions for loan losses and to recognize further loan charge-offs based upon their judgments, which may be different from ours. Any increase in the allowance for loan losses required by these regulatory agencies could have a negative effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Failure to implement our business strategies may adversely affect our financial performance.

We have developed a business plan that details the strategies we intend to implement in our efforts to achieve profitable operations. If we cannot implement our business strategies, we will be hampered in our ability to develop business and serve our customers, which, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our financial performance. Even if our business strategies are successfully implemented, we cannot assure you that our strategies will have the favorable impact that we anticipate. Furthermore, while we believe that our business plan is reasonable and that our strategies will enable us to execute our business plan, we have no control over the future occurrence of certain events upon which our business plan and strategies are based, particularly general and local economic conditions that may affect the Bank’s loan-to-deposit ratio, total deposits, the rate of deposit growth, cost of funding, the level of earning assets and interest-related revenues and expenses.

The failure to complete the Merger could negatively impact our business.

There is no assurance that the conditions to the Merger will be satisfied in a timely manner, or at all, or that the Merger will occur. Further, there is no assurance that any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the Merger Agreement will not occur. If the Merger is not completed, the share price of our common stock may drop to the extent that the current market price of our common stock reflects an assumption that the Merger will be completed. In addition, if the Merger were not to occur, under certain circumstances defined in the Merger Agreement, such as the Company entering into a merger or acquisition agreement with another company, we may be required to pay a termination fee of $1.5 million. Certain costs associated with the Merger, which were incurred subsequent to December 31, 2016, may be payable even if the Merger is not completed. Further, a failed transaction may result in negative publicity and a negative impression of us in the investment community. There can be no assurance that our business, these relationships or our financial condition will not be negatively impacted, if the Merger is not completed.

We are subject to liquidity risk.

The Company requires liquidity to meet our deposit and other obligations as they come due. The Company’s access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance its activities or on terms that are acceptable to it could be impaired by factors that affect it specifically or the financial services industry or economy generally. Factors that could reduce its access to liquidity sources include a downturn in the Texas market, difficult credit markets or adverse regulatory actions against the Company. The Company’s access to deposits may also be affected by the liquidity needs of its depositors. In particular, a substantial majority of the Company’s liabilities are demand, savings, interest checking and money market deposits, which are payable on demand or upon several days’ notice, while by comparison, a substantial portion of its assets are loans, which cannot be called or sold in the same time frame. The Company may not be able to replace maturing deposits and advances as necessary in the future, especially if a large number of its depositors sought to withdraw their accounts, regardless of the reason. A failure to maintain adequate liquidity could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and result of operations.

The Company’s accounting estimates and risk management processes rely on analytical and forecasting models.

The processes the Company uses to estimate its probable loan losses and to measure the fair value of financial instruments, as well as the processes used to estimate the effects of changing interest rates and other market measures on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, depends upon the use of analytical and forecasting models. These models reflect assumptions that may not be accurate, particularly in times of market stress or other unforeseen circumstances. Even if these assumptions are adequate, the models may prove to be inadequate or inaccurate because of other flaws in their design or their implementation. If the models the Company uses for interest rate risk and asset-liability management are inadequate, the Company may incur increased or unexpected losses upon changes in market interest rates or other market measures. If the models the Company uses for determining its probable loan losses are inadequate, the allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to support future charge-offs. If the models the Company uses to measure the fair value of financial instruments are inadequate, the fair value of such financial instruments may fluctuate unexpectedly or may not accurately reflect what the Company could realize upon sale or settlement of such financial instruments. Any such failure in the Company’s analytical or forecasting models could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may elect or be compelled to seek additional capital, but that capital may not be available or it may be dilutive.

Our ability to raise capital in the future, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets, which are outside our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly, we cannot be assured of our ability to raise capital when needed, on favorable terms or at all. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, we will be subject to increased regulatory supervision and the imposition of restrictions on our growth and business. These outcomes could negatively impact our ability to operate or further expand our operations through acquisitions or the establishment of additional branches and may result in increases in operating expenses and reductions in revenues that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, in order to raise additional capital, we may need to issue shares of our common stock that would dilute the book value of our common stock and reduce our shareholders’ percentage ownership interest to the extent they do not participate in future offerings. Also, if we are unable to raise additional capital, we may be required to take alterative actions which may include the sale of income-producing assets to meet our capital requirements, which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and ability to generate income.

We may be subject to more stringent capital and liquidity requirements which would adversely affect our net income and future growth.

The Basel III Rules establish a stricter regulatory capital framework that requires banking organizations to hold more and higher-quality capital to act as a financial cushion to absorb losses and help banking organizations better withstand periods of financial stress. The Basel III Rules increase capital ratios for all banking organizations and introduce a “capital conservation buffer” which is in addition to each capital ratio. If a banking organization dips into its capital conservation buffer, it may be restricted in its ability to pay dividends and discretionary bonus payments to its executive officers. The Basel III Rules assign a higher risk weight (150%) to exposures that are more than 90 days past due or are on non-accrual status and to certain commercial real estate facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property. The Basel III Rules also require unrealized gains and losses on certain “available-for-sale” securities holdings to be included for purposes of calculating regulatory capital requirements unless a one-time opt-out is exercised. We exercised the one-time option in the first quarter of 2015 to permanently opt-out of the inclusion of accumulated other comprehensive income in our capital calculation in order to reduce the impact of market volatility on our regulatory capital levels. The Basel III Rules also include changes in what constitutes regulatory capital, some of which are subject to a two-year transition period. These changes include the phasing-out of certain instruments as qualifying capital. In addition, Tier 2 capital is no longer limited to the amount of Tier 1 capital included in total capital. Mortgage servicing rights, certain deferred tax assets and investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries over designated percentages of common stock are required to be deducted from capital, subject to a two-year transition period.

The Basel III Rules became effective for us on January 1, 2015. As of December 31, 2016, we were in compliance with all of these requirements, including the full capital conservation buffer.

Although we currently cannot predict the specific impact and long-term effects that the Basel III Rules will have on our Company and the banking industry more generally, the Company is now required to maintain higher regulatory capital levels which could impact our operations, net income and ability to grow. Furthermore, if the Company fails to comply with the minimum capital requirements, our regulators may take formal or informal actions against us which could restrict our future growth or operations.

The Company’s use of appraisals in deciding whether to make a loan on or secured by real property does not ensure the value of the real property collateral.

In considering whether to make a loan secured by real property, we generally require an appraisal of the property. However, an appraisal is only an estimate of the value of the property at the time the appraisal is made, and an error in fact or judgment could adversely affect the reliability of an appraisal. In addition, events occurring after the initial appraisal may cause the value of the real estate to decrease. As a result of any of these factors, the value of collateral backing a loan may be less than supposed, and if a default occurs, we may not recover the outstanding balance of the loan.

The Company is subject to environmental risks associated with owning real estate or collateral.

The cost of cleaning up or paying damages and penalties associated with environmental problems could increase the Company’s operating expenses. When a borrower defaults on a loan secured by real property, the Company may purchase the property in foreclosure or accept a deed to the property surrendered by the borrower. The Company may also take over the management of commercial properties whose owners have defaulted on loans. The Company also owns and leases premises where branches and other bank facilities are located. While the Company’s lending, foreclosure and facilities policies and guidelines are intended to exclude properties with an unreasonable risk of contamination, hazardous substances could exist on some of the properties that the Company may own, acquire, manage or occupy. Environmental laws could force the Company to clean up the properties at the Company’s expense. It may cost much more to clean a property than the property is worth and it may be difficult or impossible to sell contaminated properties. The Company could also be liable for pollution generated by a borrower’s operations if the Company takes a role in managing those operations after a default.

The success of our trust services is dependent upon market fluctuations and a non-diversified source for its growth.

We offer traditional fiduciary services such as serving as executor, trustee, agent, administrator or custodian for individuals, nonprofit organizations, employee benefit plans and organizations. As of December 31, 2016, the Bank had approximately $1.2 billion in trust assets under management. To date, virtually all of the growth in our assets under management relates to a registered investment advisor who has advised its clients of the existence of our trust services. We have not compensated the registered investment advisor in any way for making its clients aware of our trust services and cannot assure you that the investment advisor will continue to notify its clients of our trust services or that those clients will open trust accounts at the Bank. Furthermore, the level of assets under management is significantly impacted by the market value of the assets. In addition, we are subject to regulatory supervision with respect to these trust services that may restrain our growth and profitability.

Certain of our investment advisory and wealth management contracts are subject to termination on short notice, and termination of a significant number of investment advisory contracts could have a material adverse impact on our revenue.

Certain of our investment advisory and wealth management clients can terminate their relationships with us, reduce their aggregate assets under management, or shift their funds to other types of accounts with different rate structures for any number of reasons, including investment performance, changes in prevailing interest rates, inflation, changes in investment preferences of clients, changes in our reputation in the marketplace, change in management or control of clients, loss of key investment management personnel and financial market performance. We cannot be certain that our trust operations will be able to retain all of its clients. If its clients terminate their investment advisory and wealth management contracts, our trust operations, and consequently we, could lose a substantial portion of our revenues and liquidity.

We have a loan concentration related to the acquisition and financing of dental practices.

Loan concentrations are considered to exist when there are amounts loaned to a multiple number of borrowers engaged in similar activities that would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. At December 31, 2016, our loan portfolio included $71.6 million of loans, approximately 44.2% of our total funded loans, to the dental industry, including practice acquisition loans, dental equipment loans, and dental facility loans. We had one loan charge-off of $345,000, representing 0.5% of year end dental portfolio assets during 2016, and we had no charge-offs during 2015 in our dental portfolio assets. We believe that these loans are conservatively underwritten to credit worthy borrowers and are diversified geographically. However, to the extent that there is a decline in the dental industry in general, we may incur significant losses in our loan portfolio as a result of this concentration.

Our operations are significantly affected by interest rate levels.

Our profitability is dependent to a large extent on our net interest income, which is the difference between interest income we earn as a result of interest paid to us on loans and investments and interest we pay to third parties such as our depositors and those from whom we borrow funds. Like most financial institutions, we are affected by changes in general interest rate levels, which are currently at record low levels, and by other economic factors beyond our control. Prolonged periods of unusually low interest rates may have an adverse effect on earnings by reducing the value of demand deposits, shareholders’ equity and fixed rate liabilities with rates higher than available earning assets. Interest rate risk can result from mismatches between the dollar amount of repricing or maturing assets and liabilities and from mismatches in the timing and rate at which our assets and liabilities reprice.

Although we have implemented strategies which we believe reduce the potential effects of changes in interest rates on our results of operations, these strategies will not always be successful. In addition, any substantial and prolonged increase in market interest rates could reduce our customers’ desire to borrow money from us or adversely affect their ability to repay their outstanding loans by increasing their costs since a significant portion of our loans have adjustable interest rates that reset periodically. If our borrowers’ ability to repay is affected, our level of non-performing assets would increase and the amount of interest earned on loans will decrease, thereby having an adverse effect on operating results. Any of these events could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.

We face intense competition from a variety of competitors.

We face competition for deposits, loans, and other financial services from other community banks, regional banks, out-of-state and in-state national banks, savings banks, thrifts, credit unions and other financial institutions as well as other entities which provide financial services, including consumer finance companies, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, mutual funds, and other lending sources and alternative investment providers. Some of these financial institutions and financial services organizations are not subject to the same degree of regulation as we are. For example, we face increased competition due to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which allows insurance firms, securities firms, and other non-traditional financial companies to provide traditional banking services. The banking business in our target banking market and the surrounding areas has become increasingly competitive over the past several years, and we expect the level of competition to continue to increase. Many of these competitors have been in business for many years, have established customers, are larger, have substantially higher lending limits than we do, and are able to offer certain services that we do not provide. In addition, many of these entities have greater capital resources than we have, which among other things may allow them to price their services at levels more favorable to the customer or to provide larger credit facilities.

Although we believe that the Bank will be a successful competitor in the area’s financial services market, our inability to compete effectively with other financial institutions serving our target banking market could have a material adverse effect on the Bank’s growth and profitability.

We compete in an industry that continually experiences technological change, and we may not be able to compete effectively with other banking institutions with greater resources.

The banking industry continues to undergo rapid technological changes with frequent introduction of new technology-driven products and services. In addition to providing better service to customers, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables us to reduce costs. Our future success depends in part upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience as well as to create additional operating efficiencies. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. Such technology may permit competitors to perform certain functions at a lower cost than we can. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these to our customers. Our inability to do so could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete effectively in our market and also on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our legal lending limits may impair our ability to attract borrowers and ability to compete with larger financial institutions.

Our per customer lending limit at December 31, 2016 was approximately $4.8 million, subject to further reduction based on regulatory criteria. Accordingly, the size of loans which we can offer to potential customers is less than the size which many of our competitors with larger lending limits are able to offer. This limit has affected and will continue to affect our ability to seek relationships with larger businesses in our market area. We accommodate loans in excess of our lending limit through the sale of portions of such loans to other banks. However, we may not be successful in attracting or maintaining customers seeking larger loans or in selling portions of such larger loans on terms that are favorable to us.

An economic downturn, especially one affecting our primary service area, could diminish the quality of our loan portfolio, reduce our deposit base, and negatively affect our financial performance.

Adverse economic developments can impact the collectability of loans and the sustainability of our core deposits and may negatively impact our earnings and financial condition. In addition, the banking industry in general is affected by economic conditions such as inflation, recession, unemployment, and other factors beyond our control. A prolonged economic recession or other economic dislocation could cause increases in non-performing assets and impair the values of real estate collateral, thereby causing operating losses, decreasing liquidity, and eroding capital. Factors that adversely affect the economy in our local banking market could reduce our deposit base and the demand for our products and services, which may decrease our earnings capability.

Curtailment of government guaranteed loan programs could affect a segment of our business.

A major segment of our business consists of originating and periodically selling government guaranteed loans, in particular those guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and the SBA. From time to time, the government agencies that guarantee these loans reach their internal limits and cease to guarantee loans. In addition, these agencies may change their rules for loans or Congress may adopt legislation that would have the effect of discontinuing or changing the loan programs. Non-governmental programs could replace government programs for some borrowers, but the terms might not be equally acceptable. Therefore, if these changes occur, the volume of loans to small businesses, industrial and agricultural borrowers of the types that now qualify for government guaranteed loans could decline. Also, the profitability of these loans could decline. As the funding of the guaranteed portion of 7(a) loans has historically been a major portion of our business, a long-term decrease in the funding for the 7(a) loan program may have an unfavorable impact on our future performance and results of operations.

Monetary policy and other economic factors could adversely affect the Bank’s profitability.

Our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected by changes in prevailing economic conditions, including declines in real estate market values, rapid changes in interest rates, and the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government. Our profitability is dependent to a large extent on our net interest income, which is the difference between interest income we earn as a result of interest paid to us on loans and investments and interest we pay to third parties such as our depositors and those from whom we borrow funds. As with most banking institutions, our net interest spread is affected by general economic conditions and other factors that influence market interest rates and our ability to respond to changes in such rates. At any given time, our assets and liabilities may be affected differently by a given change in interest rates. As a result, an increase or decrease in rates could have a material adverse effect on our net income, capital and liquidity. While we take measures to reduce interest-rate risk, these measures may not adequately minimize exposure to interest-rate risk.

We are subject to extensive government regulation and supervision, which could constrain our growth and profitability.

The Company is subject to extensive federal and state regulation and supervision. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors’ funds, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not the interests of shareholders. These regulations affect the Company’s lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy and growth, among other things. Federal and state statutes and related regulations, including tax policy and corporate governance rules, can significantly affect the way in which bank holding companies, and public companies in general, conduct business.

Changes to federal or state statutes, regulations or regulatory and tax policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of new and existing statutes, regulations or policies, or new laws, regulation could affect the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways, including subjecting the Company to additional operating, tax, governance and compliance costs, increasing the Company’s deposit insurance premiums, limiting the types of assets the Company may be allowed to hold, limiting the types of financial services and products the Company may offer and/or increasing competition from other non-bank providers of financial services.

The Dodd-Frank Act, implements significant changes to the regulation of the financial services industry and includes many reforms and provisions that have affected or are likely to affect the Company. Many aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to rulemaking by various regulatory agencies and will take effect over several years, making it difficult at this time to anticipate the overall financial impact of this expansive legislation on the Company, its customers or the financial industry generally.

The CFPB was created under the Dodd-Frank Act to centralize responsibility for consumer financial protection with broad rulemaking authority to administer and carry out the purposes and objectives of the “Federal consumer financial laws, and to prevent evasions thereof,” with respect to all financial institutions that offer financial products and services to consumers. The CFPB is also authorized to prescribe rules applicable to any covered person or service provider, identifying and prohibiting acts or practices that are “unfair, deceptive, or abusive” in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a consumer financial product or service, or the offering of a consumer financial product or service (“UDAAP authority”). The ongoing broad rulemaking powers of the CFPB and its UDAAP authority have potential to have a significant impact on the operations of financial institutions offering consumer financial products or services.

The Bank is subject to federal and state fair lending laws, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to material penalties. Federal and state fair lending laws and regulations, such as the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act, impose nondiscriminatory lending requirements on financial institutions. The Department of Justice, CFPB and other federal and state agencies are responsible for enforcing these laws and regulations. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution’s performance under fair lending laws in private class action litigation. A successful challenge to the Bank’s performance under the fair lending laws and regulations could adversely impact the Bank’s rating under the Community Reinvestment Act and result in a wide variety of sanctions, including the required payment of damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, imposition of restrictions on merger and acquisition activity and restrictions on expansion activity, which could negatively impact the Bank’s reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

See the section entitled “Supervision and Regulation” contained in Item 1, “Business,” for additional information regarding the supervisory and regulatory issues facing the Company.

The repeal of federal prohibitions on payment of interest on demand deposits could increase our interest expense.

All federal prohibitions on the ability of financial institutions to pay interest on demand deposit accounts were repealed as part of the Dodd-Frank Act beginning on July 21, 2011. As a result, some financial institutions have commenced offering interest on demand deposits to compete for customers. If interest rates begin to rise, the Company’s interest expense will increase and its net interest margin will decrease if it begins offering interest on demand deposits to attract additional customers or maintain current customers, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

System failure or cyber security breaches of our network security could subject us to increased operating costs as well as litigation and other potential losses.

The computer systems and network infrastructure we use could be vulnerable to unforeseen hardware and cybersecurity issues. Our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect our computer equipment against damage from fire, power loss, telecommunications failure or a similar catastrophic event. Any damage or failure that causes an interruption in our operations could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect the computer systems and network infrastructure utilized by us, including our Internet banking activities, against damage from physical break-ins, cybersecurity breaches and other disruptive problems caused by the Internet or other users. Such computer break-ins and other disruptions would jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through our computer systems and network infrastructure, which may result in significant liability to us, damage our reputation and inhibit current and potential customers from our Internet banking services. To date interruptions of our computer system have been infrequent and have not had a material impact on our operations. Each year, we add additional security measures to our computer systems and network infrastructure to mitigate the possibility of cybersecurity breaches including firewalls and penetration testing. We continue to investigate cost effective measures as well as insurance protection.

Furthermore, our customers could incorrectly blame the Company and terminate their accounts with the Company for a cyber-incident which occurred on their own system or with that of an unrelated third party. In addition, a security breach could also subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny and expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability.

Finally, the Obama Administration released an executive order, Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity, referred to as the Executive Order, which is focused primarily on government actions to support critical infrastructure owners and operators in protecting their systems and networks from cyber threats. The Executive Order also will steer certain private sector companies to comply voluntarily with the Cybersecurity Framework. In response to the Executive Order, the FFIEC has published cybersecurity guidance on its website, along with observations from recent cybersecurity assessments. These assessments were conducted with the goal of identifying gaps in the regulators’ examination procedures and training that can be used to strengthen the oversight of cybersecurity readiness. The implementation of any recommended guidance could require us to incur additional costs.

Breakdowns in our internal controls and procedures could have an adverse effect on us.

We believe our internal control system as currently documented and functioning is adequate to provide reasonable assurance over our internal controls. Nevertheless, because of the inherent limitation in administering a cost effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Breakdowns in our internal controls and procedures could occur in the future, and any such breakdowns could have an adverse effect on us. See “Item 9A – Controls and Procedures” for additional information.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

Our common stock is thinly traded and, therefore, you may have difficulty selling shares.

The Company’s common stock is traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) under the symbol “TBNC”; however, we have no ability to ensure that an active market will exist in the future or that shares can be liquidated without delay. The average daily trading volume in our stock during 2016 was 1,345 shares.

We do not anticipate paying dividends for the foreseeable future.

If the Merger does not occur, we do not anticipate dividends will be paid on our common stock for the foreseeable future. The Company is largely dependent upon dividends paid by the Bank to provide funds to pay cash dividends if and when the board of directors may declare such dividends. Our future earnings may not be sufficient to satisfy regulatory requirements and permit the legal payment of dividends to shareholders at any time in the future. Even if we could legally declare dividends, the amount and timing of such dividends would be at the sole discretion of our board of directors.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile.

The market price of our common stock is subject to fluctuations as a result of a variety of factors, including the following:

 
·
quarterly variations in our operating results or those of other banking institutions;
 
·
changes in national and regional economic conditions, financial markets or the banking industry; and
 
·
other developments affecting us or other financial institutions.

The trading volume of our common stock is limited, which may increase the volatility of the market price for our stock. In addition, the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations in recent years. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market prices of securities issued by many companies for reasons not necessarily related to the operating performance of these companies.

An investment in our common stock is not an insured deposit.

Our common stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the FDIC, any other deposit insurance fund, or by any other public or private entity. Investment in our common stock is inherently risky for the reasons described in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. As a result, if you acquire our common stock, you may lose some or all of your investment.

Item 2.

Properties.

Our main office is in a two story, 33,000 square foot commercial office building located at 16200 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, Texas 75248. During the second quarter of 2013, the Bank acquired the building and relocated its main office to that location in May 2014. The Bank occupies approximately 11,000 square feet of the space, or 33% of the building, and currently leases approximately 64% to tenants.

As of December 31, 2016, we also leased office space located at 850 E. Highway 114, Southlake, Texas, which is approximately 15 miles northwest of the main office. The space is 2,245 square feet on the second floor of a two story, commercial building in a developed commercial center. The lease for this office began on February 1, 2007 for a term of 120 months. On May 1, 2013, the Bank entered into a sub-lease agreement covering its entire space located at 850 E. Highway 114, Southlake, Texas. The term of the sub-lease ran concurrently with the term of the Bank’s primary lease expiring on February 28, 2017. We did not renew the lease and sub-lease agreements.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings.

The Bank is involved, from time to time, in various legal actions arising in the normal course of its business. Based on the information presently available, management believes that the ultimate outcome in such proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCBB under the symbol “TBNC”. The table below gives the high and low bid information for the last two fiscal years. The bid information in the table was obtained from the OTCBB and reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions. There may have been other transactions in our common stock of which we are not aware.

 

 

High

   

Low

 

2016

           

Fourth Quarter

 

$

10.00

   

$

7.30

 

Third Quarter

 

$

7.60

   

$

7.00

 

Second Quarter

 

$

7.45

   

$

6.50

 

First Quarter

 

$

6.96

   

$

6.51

 

 

               

2015

               

Fourth Quarter

 

$

7.35

   

$

6.80

 

Third Quarter

 

$

7.01

   

$

6.70

 

Second Quarter

 

$

7.30

   

$

6.80

 

First Quarter

 

$

7.00

   

$

6.22

 

On March 15, 2017, we had 293 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

It is the policy of our Board of Directors to reinvest earnings for such period of time as is necessary to ensure our successful operations. Other than in connection with the Merger, there are no current plans to initiate payment of cash dividends, and future dividends will depend on our earnings, capital and regulatory requirements, financial condition, and other factors considered relevant by our Board of Directors. In addition, we are subject to regulatory restrictions on our payment of dividends. For more information regarding the Company’s ability to pay dividends, please refer to the “Supervision and Regulation” section under Item 1.

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data.

Because we are a smaller reporting company, disclosure under this item is not required.

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.

This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Item 1—Business—Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those listed under “Item 1A—Risk Factors.”

Introduction

We are a bank holding company headquartered in Dallas, Texas, offering a broad array of banking services through our wholly owned banking subsidiary, T Bank, N.A.

Business Strategy

We believe we can effectively compete as a community bank in our market area and the niche markets we serve. We focus our marketing efforts in three areas. We serve our local geographic market which is the Dallas - Fort Worth metropolitan area. We serve the dental and other health professional industries through a centralized loan and deposit platform that operates out of our main office in Dallas, Texas. We serve the small business community by offering loans guaranteed by the SBA as well as the USDA through a national network of employee Business Development Officers who operate from their homes or executive office suites. We offer a broad range of commercial and consumer banking services primarily to small to medium-sized businesses and their employees. Because of our technological capabilities, including worldwide free automated teller machine (“ATM”) withdrawals, sophisticated on-line banking capabilities, electronic funds transfer capabilities, and economical remote deposit solutions, we believe we can be the primary bank for most customers no matter where they are located. We believe that meeting the needs of our customers and making their banking experience more efficient leads to increased customer loyalty. In addition to our traditional banking services, we offer trust services to individuals and benefit plans.

We are able to utilize relatively low cost deposits provided by our trust activities to fund additional loan growth. The amount of deposits available to us while maintaining full FDIC insurance protection for our trust customers has consistently exceeded $22 million for the last three years. We anticipate the trust custodial deposits to be relatively low cost and comparable to the rate we pay non-trust customers on money market account balances.

The Bank’s goals are as follows:

 
·
sustain profitability;
 
·
maintain controlled growth by focusing on increasing our loan and deposit market share by providing personalized customer service;
 
·
closely manage yields on earning assets and rates on interest-bearing liabilities;
 
·
continue focusing on noninterest income opportunities including our trust business;
 
·
maintain our positive working relationship with our regulators;
 
·
control noninterest expenses; and,
 
·
maintain strong asset quality.

Definitive Agreement with Tectonic Acquisition, Inc.

On November 10, 2016, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with T Acquisition, Inc. (“Parent”), and joined in by Tectonic Advisors, LLC (“Tectonic”), pursuant to which Parent will acquire the Company through the merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company surviving the Merger.

In connection with the Merger, holders of the Company’s common stock will be entitled to receive an amount in cash consisting of two payments that, based on the Company’s Adjusted Equity (as defined in the Merger Agreement) at December 31, 2016, would have totaled approximately $10.3036 per share:

 
·
Special Dividend.  The first payment is a special dividend to be paid by the Company to each holder of record of common stock as of a date just prior to closing in an amount by which the Company’s Adjusted Equity as of a date just prior to closing exceeds $20,000,000.  Based on the Company’s estimated, unaudited shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2016, the special dividend would have equaled approximately $2.2761 per share. The special dividend will increase (or decrease) based on the Company’s net income (or net losses) from December 31, 2016 to a date just prior to closing.
 
 
·
Per Share Merger Consideration. The second payment is the per share merger consideration to be paid by Parent for each share of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effect time of the Merger equal to approximately $8.0275 per share, subject to adjustment.
 
 
The Merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals and approval by the shareholders of the Company.

The Merger was approved by shareholders of the Company on March 10, 2017 and is subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals.

The Merger is currently expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2017.

2016 Executive Overview

Financial Highlights

The following were significant factors related to 2016 results as compared to 2015.

Net income for 2016 was $4.0 million, or $0.98 per diluted common share, compared to $3.3 million, or $0.81 per diluted common share in 2015. Net income before income tax for 2016 was $6.2 million compared to $5.1 million for 2015. The Company recorded income tax expense of $2.2 million and $1.8 million for years ended 2016 and 2015, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2016, return on average assets was 1.98% and return on average equity was 14.10%. For the year ended December 31, 2015, return on average assets was 1.93% and return on average equity was 13.37%.

Net interest income increased $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $8.9 million, compared to $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily due to an increase in average interest-earning assets during 2016. Net interest margin increased from 4.61% in 2015 to 4.64% in 2016.

Non-interest income decreased $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $13.9 million, compared to $14.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.The decrease was primarily due to a decrease of $1.9 million in trust management fees, offset by an increase of $1.1 million in gain on sale of loans.

Non-interest expense decreased $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $16.0 million, compared to $17.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease of $2.0 million in trust consulting fees, offset by an increase of $700,000 in salaries and employee benefits.

The Company recorded a provision for loan losses of $589,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.There was no provision for loan losses in 2015. The Company had net charge-offs of $458,000 and $131,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Total assets at December 31, 2016 increased $36.2 million, or 20.5%, to $213.1 million, compared to $176.9 million at December 31, 2015. This increase was due to an increase in commercial and SBA loans. Our loans held for investment increased $21.1 million, or 15.3%, to $158.7 million as of December 31, 2016, compared to $137.6 million as of December 31, 2015, along with an increase of $9.6 million in securities held to maturity and a $4.8 million increase in loans held for sale.

The book value of our common stock increased to $7.69 per share at December 31, 2016, compared to $6.74 per share at December 31, 2015.

Non-performing assets, net of SBA guaranteed loans, decreased $404,000, from $443,000 as of December 31, 2015, to $39,000 as of December 31, 2016.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s financial condition and results of operations are sensitive to accounting measurements and estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. When applying accounting policies in areas that are subjective in nature, the Company must use its best judgment to arrive at the carrying value of certain assets. The following accounting policies are identified by management as being critical to the results of operations:

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses, increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs less recoveries. Management estimates the allowance balance required by considering the collectability of loans based on historical experience and the borrower’s ability to repay, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and the estimated value of any underlying collateral, economic conditions and other factors. The allowance consists of general and specific reserves. The specific component relates to loans that are individually evaluated and determined to be impaired. This evaluation is often based on significant estimates and assumptions due to the level of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters of the susceptibility of such matters to change. The general component relates to the entire group of loans that are evaluated in the aggregate based primarily on industry historical loss experience adjusted for current economic factors. To the extent actual loan losses differ materially from management’s estimate of these subjective factors, loan growth/run-off accelerates, or the mix of loan types changes, the level of the provision for loan loss, and related allowance can, and will, fluctuate. As of December 31, 2016, the allowance for loan losses was $1.7 million, which represented approximately 1.1% of total loans.

Securities available for sale

Securities available for sale are evaluated periodically to determine whether a decline in their value is other than temporary. The term “other than temporary” is not intended to indicate a permanent decline in value. Rather, it means that the prospects for near term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support fair values equal to, or greater than, the carrying value of the security.

The initial indication of other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) for both debt and equity securities is a decline in the market value below the amount recorded for an investment, and the severity and duration of the decline. In determining whether an impairment is other than temporary, we consider the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been below cost, recent events specific to the issuer, including investment downgrades by rating agencies and economic conditions of its industry, our intent to sell the investment, and if it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. For marketable equity securities, we also consider the issuer’s financial condition, capital strength, and near−term prospects. For debt securities and for perpetual preferred securities that are treated as debt securities for the purpose of OTTI analysis, we also consider the cause of the price decline (general level of interest rates and industry− and issuer−specific factors), the issuer’s financial condition, near−term prospects and current ability to make future payments in a timely manner, the issuer’s ability to service debt, and any change in agencies’ ratings at evaluation date from acquisition date and any likely imminent action. Once a decline in value is determined to be other than temporary, the security is segmented into credit− and noncredit−related components. Any impairment adjustment due to identified credit−related components is recorded as an adjustment to current period earnings, while noncredit−related fair value adjustments are recorded through other comprehensive income. In situations where we intend to sell or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security, the entire OTTI loss must be recognized in earnings.

Income taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary difference between carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Prior to 2013, the Company had provided a 100% valuation allowance for its net deferred tax asset due to the Company’s recent net operating loss history. No valuation allowance for deferred tax assets was recorded at December 31, 2016 and 2015, as management believes it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax assets will be realized because they were supported by the Company’s earnings for the years 2012 through 2016. Positions taken by the Company in preparing the consolidated federal tax return are subject to the review of the Internal Revenue Service or to reinterpretation based on management’s ongoing assessment of facts and evolving case law, and as such, positions taken by management could result in a material adjustment to the financial statements.

Periodically and in the ordinary course of business, we are involved in inquiries and reviews by tax authorities that normally require management to provide supplemental information to support certain tax positions we take in our tax returns. Uncertain tax positions are initially recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions are initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. Management believes it has taken appropriate positions on its tax returns, although the ultimate outcome of any tax review cannot be predicted with certainty. Still, the final outcome of these matters may be different than what is reflected in the current and historical financial statements.

Loan income recognition

Interest income on loans is accrued at the contractual rate based on the principal outstanding. Loan origination fees are deferred and amortized as a yield adjustment over the contractual loan terms. Accrual of interest is discontinued when its receipt is in doubt, which typically occurs when a loan becomes impaired. Any interest accrued to income in the year when interest accruals are discontinued is generally reversed. Management may elect to continue the accrual of interest when a loan is in the process of collection and the estimated fair value of the collateral is sufficient to satisfy the principal balance and accrued interest. Loans are returned to accrual status once the doubt concerning collectability has been removed and the borrower has demonstrated the ability to pay and remain current. Payments on non-accrual loans are generally applied to principal.

Real estate acquired through foreclosure

We record foreclosed real estate assets at the lower of cost or estimated fair value on the acquisition date and at the lower of such initial amount or estimated fair value less estimated selling costs thereafter. Estimated fair value is based upon many subjective factors, including location and condition of the property and current economic conditions, among other things. Because the calculation of fair value relies on estimates and judgments relating to inherently uncertain events, results may differ from our estimates.

Write-downs on foreclosed real estate assets at the time of transfer are made through the allowance for loan losses. Write-downs subsequent to transfer are included in our noninterest expenses, along with operating income, net of related expenses of such properties and gains or losses realized upon disposition.

Stock based compensation

The fair value of the Company’s employee stock options is estimated at the date of grant using the Modified Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. In calculating the fair value of the options, management makes assumptions regarding the risk-free rate of return, the expected volatility of our common stock and the expected life of the options.

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we recorded expense of $102,000 and $40,000, respectively, for outstanding option grants.

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we recorded expense of $97,000 and $58,000, respectively, for service shares of the Company’s common stock which were awarded to the directors in 2016 and 2015 totaling 13,750 and 7,975, respectively.

Fair value of financial instruments

Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in a separate note. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates.

Related party transactions

The Company has deposits of certain officers, directors and their affiliated companies, and also purchases corporate and health insurance from certain directors affiliated companies. Details of related party activity are presented in Note 13 of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Please refer to Note 1 of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to the adoption of new accounting standards and the effect of newly issued but not yet effective accounting standards.

Financial Condition

Investment Securities

The primary purpose of the Bank’s investment portfolio is to provide a source of earnings for liquidity management purposes, to provide collateral to pledge against borrowings, and to control interest rate risk. In managing the portfolio, the Bank seeks to attain the objectives of safety of principal, liquidity, diversification, and maximized return on investment.

At December 31, 2016, securities available for sale consisted of U.S. government agency securities and mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Securities held to maturity consisted of Property Assessed Clean Energy investments. These investment contracts or bonds located in California and Florida, originate under a contractual obligation between the property owners, the local county administration, and a third-party administrator and sponsor. The assessments are created to fund the purchase and installation of energy saving improvements to the property such as solar panels. Generally, as a property assessment, the total assessment is repaid in installments over a period of 10 to 15 years by the then current property owner(s). Each installment is collected by the County Tax Collector where the property is located. The assessments are an obligation of the property. Each assessment is equal in priority to the other property taxes and assessments associated with the property, including local school, city, and county ad-valorem taxes. Restricted securities consisted of Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (“FRB”) stock, having an amortized cost and fair value of $570,000 as of December 31, 2016, and Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas (“FHLB”) stock, having an amortized cost and fair value of $484,000 as of December 31, 2016. The weighted average yield for the securities was 3.55% for the year ended December 31, 2016.

At December 31, 2015, securities available for sale consisted of U.S. government agency securities and mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. The Company had no securities held to maturity. Restricted securities consisted of FRB stock, having an amortized cost and fair value of $570,000 as of December 31, 2015, and FHLB stock, having an amortized cost and fair value of $475,500 as of December 31, 2015. The weighted average yield for the securities was 2.16% for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The following presents the amortized cost and fair values of the securities portfolio as of the dates indicated:

 

As of December 31,

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

(In thousands)

Amortized
Cost

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Securities available for sale:

               

U.S. government agencies

 

$

8,247

   

$

7,961

   

$

9,155

   

$

9,162

 

Mortgage-backed securities

   

2,844

     

2,792

     

3,284

     

3,290

 

Securities held to maturity:

                               

Property assessed clean energy

   

9,668

     

9,668

     

-

     

-

 

Securities, restricted:

                               

Other

   

1,054

     

1,054

     

1,046

     

1,046

 

Total

 

$

21,813

   

$

21,475

   

$

13,485

   

$

13,498

 

The following tables summarize the maturity distribution schedule with corresponding weighted-average yields of securities available for sale and securities held to maturity as of December 31, 2016. Yields are calculated based on amortized cost. Mortgage-backed securities are included in maturity categories based on their stated maturity date. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. Other securities classified as restricted include stock in the FRB and the FHLB, which have no maturity date. These securities have been included in the total column only and are not included in the total yield.

 

 

Maturing

 

 

 

One Year
or Less

   

After One Year
Through
Five Years

   

After Five Years
Through
Ten Years

   

After
Ten Years

   

Total

 

(In thousands, except percentages)

 

Amount

   

Yield

   

Amount

   

Yield

   

Amount

   

Yield

   

Amount

   

Yield

   

Amount

   

Yield

 

Securities available for sale:

                                                           

U.S. government agencies

 

$

-

     

-

%

 

$

1,019

     

1.00

%

 

$

6,686

     

2.23

%

 

$

542

     

3.94

%

 

$

8,247

     

2.19

%

Mortgage-backed securities

   

-

     

-

     

-

     

-

     

1,635

     

2.46

     

1,209

     

2.12

     

2,844

     

2.31

 

Total

 

$

-

     

-

%

 

$

1,019

     

1.00

%

 

$

8,321

     

2.28

%

 

$

1,751

     

2.68

%

 

$

11,091

     

2.22

%

Securities held to maturity:

                                                                               

Property assessed clean energy

 

$

-

     

-

%

 

$

370

     

4.53

%

 

$

4,522

     

5.84

%

 

$

4,776

     

7.18

%

 

$

9,668

     

6.46

%

Securities, restricted:

                                                                               

Other

 

$

-

     

-

%

 

$

-

     

-

%

 

$

-

     

-

%

 

$

-

     

-

%

 

$

1,054

     

-

%

Loan Portfolio Composition

Total loans held for investment increased $21.1 million, or 15.0%, to $161.9 million at December 31, 2016, compared to $140.8 million at December 31, 2015. Commercial and industrial loans comprise the largest group of loans in our portfolio amounting to $81.9 million, or 50.6% of the total loan portfolio, at December 31, 2016, compared to $71.6 million, or 50.8% of the total loan portfolio, at December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2016, SBA loans totaled $39.7 million, or 24.6% of the total loan portfolio, compared to $28.9 million, or 20.8%, at December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2016, commercial real estate loans totaled $26.4 million, or 16.3% of the total loan portfolio, compared to $27.1 million, or 19.2%, at December 31, 2015. The following table sets forth the composition of our loans held for investment: 

   

As of December 31,

 

(In thousands, except percentages)

 

2016

   

2015

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

81,945

     

50.6

%

 

$

71,562

     

50.8

%

Consumer installment

   

3,749

     

2.3

%

   

2,049

     

1.5

%

Real estate – residential

   

6,531

     

4.0

%

   

6,851

     

4.9

%

Real estate – commercial

   

20,042

     

12.4

%

   

16,736

     

11.9

%

Real estate – construction and land

   

6,335

     

3.9

%

   

10,322

     

7.3

%

SBA 7(a) unguaranteed portion

   

29,859

     

18.5

%

   

22,596

     

16.0

%

SBA 504

   

9,825

     

6.1

%

   

6,349

     

4.5

%

USDA

   

3,589

     

2.2

%

   

2,787

     

2.0

%

Other

   

6

     

0.0

%

   

1,542

     

1.1

%

Total Loans

 

$

161,881

     

100.0

%

 

$

140,794

     

100.0

%

The Company records the guaranteed portion of the SBA 7(a) and USDA loans as held for sale at the lower of cost or market value. Loans held for sale totaled $11.2 million and $6.4 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Loan concentrations are considered to exist when there are amounts loaned to multiple borrowers engaged in similar activities that would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. At December 31, 2016, our loan portfolio included $71.6 million of loans, approximately 44.2% of our total funded loans, to the dental industry, as compared to $61.6 million, or 43.7% of total funded loans, at December 31, 2015. We believe that these loans are to credit worthy borrowers and are diversified geographically. As new loans are generated to replace loans which have been paid off or reduced balances as a result of payments, the percentage of the total loan portfolio creating the foregoing concentration may remain constant thereby continuing the risk associated with industry concentration.

As of December 31, 2016, 36.6% of the loan portfolio, or $59.3 million, matures or re-prices within one year or less. The following table presents the contractual maturity ranges for commercial, consumer and real estate loans outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and also presents for each maturity range the portion of loans that have fixed interest rates or variable interest rates over the life of the loan in accordance with changes in the interest rate environment as represented by the base rate:

 

 

As of December 31, 2016

 

 

       

Over 1 Year through 5 Years

   

Over 5 Years

       

(In thousands)

 

One Year or
Less

   

Fixed Rate

   

Floating or
Adjustable
Rate

   

Fixed Rate

   

Floating or
Adjustable
Rate

   

Total

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

8,727

   

$

11,241

   

$

26,379

   

$

35,578

   

$

20

   

$

81,945

 

Consumer installment

   

885

     

2,125

     

-

     

739

     

-

     

3,749

 

Real estate – residential

   

1,272

     

4,846

     

309

     

104

     

-

     

6,531

 

Real estate – commercial

   

5,799

     

2,022

     

2,018

     

6,185

     

4,018

     

20,042

 

Real estate – construction and land

   

3,924

     

389

     

-

     

2,022

     

-

     

6,335

 

SBA 7(a) unguaranteed portion

   

28,489

     

-

     

948

     

422

     

-

     

29,859

 

SBA 504

   

7,616

     

-

     

2,209

     

-

     

-

     

9,825

 

USDA

   

2,624

     

-

     

965

     

-

     

-

     

3,589

 

Other

   

6

     

-

     

-

     

-

     

-

     

6

 

Total

 

$

59,342

   

$

20,623

   

$

32,828

   

$

45,050

   

$

4,038

   

$

161,881

 
 
 

 

 

As of December 31, 2015

 

 

       

Over 1 Year through 5 Years

   

Over 5 Years

       

(In thousands)

 

One Year or
Less

   

Fixed Rate

   

Floating or
Adjustable
Rate

   

Fixed Rate

   

Floating or
Adjustable
Rate

   

Total

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

15,928

   

$

11,710

   

$

24,657

   

$

19,267

   

$

-

   

$

71,562

 

Consumer installment

   

1,230

     

221

     

-

     

598

     

-

     

2,049

 

Real estate – residential

   

2,054

     

4,703

     

94

     

-

     

-

     

6,851

 

Real estate – commercial

   

3,841

     

4,371

     

3,085

     

3,295

     

2,144

     

16,736

 

Real estate – construction and land

   

7,177

     

3,145

     

-

     

-

     

-

     

10,322

 

SBA 7(a) unguaranteed portion

   

22,371

     

-

     

156

     

69

     

-

     

22,596

 

SBA 504

   

6,349

     

-

     

-

     

-

     

-

     

6,349

 

USDA

   

1,808

     

-

     

979

     

-

     

-

     

2,787

 

Other

   

1,542

     

-

     

-

     

-

     

-

     

1,542

 

Total

 

$

62,300

   

$

24,150

   

$

28,971

   

$

23,229

   

$

2,144

   

$

140,794

 

Scheduled contractual principal repayments of loans do not reflect the actual life of such assets. The average life of loans is less than their average contractual terms due to prepayments.

Non-performing Assets

Our primary business is making commercial, real estate, and consumer loans. That activity entails potential loan losses, the magnitude of which depends on a variety of economic factors affecting borrowers which are beyond our control. While we have instituted underwriting guidelines and policies and credit review procedures to protect us from avoidable credit losses, some losses will inevitably occur.

Non-performing assets include non-accrual loans, loans 90 days past due and still accruing, OREO and other repossessed assets. Non-performing assets, net of SBA guaranteed loans, decreased $404,000 to $39,000 at December 31, 2016, as compared to $443,000 at December 31, 2015. Non-accrual loans include two commercial and industrial loans totaling $39,000 at December 31, 2016 as compared to two commercial and industrial loans totaling $443,000 and one SBA loan totaling $477,000 at December 31, 2015. During the second quarter of 2015, the Company repurchased the guaranteed portion of a defaulted SBA loan with a balance of $477,000. During the second quarter of 2016, the Company received proceeds from the SBA to pay off the loan. There were no foreclosed assets at December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Loans are placed on non-accrual status when management has concerns relating to the ability to collect the loan principal and interest and generally when such loans are 90 days or more past due. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that not all principal and interest amounts will be collected according to the loan contract.

Foreclosed assets represent property acquired as the result of borrower defaults on loans. Foreclosed assets are recorded at estimated fair value, less estimated selling costs, at the time of foreclosure. Write-downs occurring at foreclosure are charged against the allowance for possible loan losses. On an ongoing basis, properties are appraised as required by market indications and applicable regulations. Write-downs are provided for subsequent declines in value and are included in other non-interest expense along with other expenses related to maintaining the properties.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding non-performing assets and restructured loans by type, including ratios of such loans to total assets as of the dates indicated:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

(In thousands, except percentages)

 

2016

   

2015

 

Allocated:

 

Amount

   

Loan
Category to
Total Assets

   

Amount

   

Loan
Category to
Total Assets

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

39

     

0.02

%

 

$

443

     

0.25

%

SBA

   

-

     

-

     

477

     

0.27

 

Total non-accrual loans

   

39

     

0.02

     

920

     

0.52

 

SBA guaranteed portion

   

-

     

-

     

(477

)

   

(0.27

)

Total non-accrual loans, net

   

39

     

0.02

     

443

     

0.25

 

Loans past due 90 days and accruing

   

-

     

-

     

-

     

-

 

Foreclosed assets

   

-

     

-

     

-

     

-

 

Total non-performing assets

 

$

39

     

0.02

%

 

$

443

     

0.25

%

Restructured loans on non-accrual

 

$

9

     

0.00

%

 

$

381

     

0.22

%

We record interest payments received on impaired loans as interest income unless collections of the remaining recorded investment are placed on non-accrual, at which time we record payments received as reductions of principal. We recognized interest income on impaired loans of approximately $30,000 and $80,000 during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. If interest on impaired loans had been recognized on a full accrual basis during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, income would have increased by approximately $34,000 and $54,000, respectively.

Restructured loans are considered “troubled debt restructurings” if due to the borrower’s financial difficulties, we have granted a concession that we would not otherwise consider. This may include a transfer of real estate or other assets from the borrower, a modification of loan terms, or a combination of the two. Modifications of terms that could potentially qualify as a troubled debt restructuring include reduction of contractual interest rate, extension of the maturity date at a contractual interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk, or a reduction of the face amount of debt, either forgiveness of principal or accrued interest. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had loans totaling $9,000 and $381,000, respectively, considered to be a troubled debt restructuring which were on non-accrual.

There were no loans past due 90 days and still accruing interest at December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Potential problem loans consist of loans that are performing in accordance with contractual terms, but for which we have concerns about the borrower’s ability to comply with repayment terms because of the borrower’s potential financial difficulties. We monitor these loans closely and review their performance on a regular basis. At December 31, 2016, we had three borrower relationships with loans of this type totaling $366,000, which were not included in non-accrual or restructured loans.

Credit Risk Management

Credit risk is the risk of loss arising from the inability of a borrower to meet its obligations. We manage credit risk by evaluating the risk profile of the borrower, repayment sources, the nature of the underlying collateral, and other support given current events, conditions, and expectations. We attempt to manage the risk characteristics of our loan portfolio through various control processes, such as credit evaluation of borrowers, establishment of lending limits, and application of lending procedures, including the holding of adequate collateral and the maintenance of compensating balances. However, we seek to rely primarily on the cash flow of our borrowers as the principal source of repayment. Although credit policies and evaluation processes are designed to minimize our risk, management recognizes that loan losses will occur and the amount of these losses will fluctuate depending on the risk characteristics of our loan portfolio, as well as general and regional economic conditions.

We provide for loan losses through the establishment of an allowance for loan losses by provisions charged against earnings. Our allowance represents an estimated reserve for existing losses in the loan portfolio. We deploy a systematic methodology for determining our allowance that includes a quarterly review process, risk rating, and adjustment to our allowance. We classify our portfolios as either consumer or commercial and monitor credit risk separately as discussed below. We evaluate the adequacy of our allowance continually based on a review of all significant loans, with a particular emphasis on non-accruing, past due, and other loans that we believe require special attention.

The allowance consists of two elements: (1) specific reserves and valuation allowances for individual credits; (2) general reserves for types or portfolios of loans based on a number of quantitative factors such as loss history and industry default rates, as well as several qualitative factors that are the judgement of management. All outstanding loans are considered in evaluating the adequacy of the allowance.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for credit losses in the loan portfolio. Management has adopted a methodology to properly analyze and determine an adequate loan loss allowance, which includes allowance allocations calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 310, “Receivables” and allowance allocations calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies.” The analysis is based on sound, reliable and well documented information and is designed to support an allowance that is adequate to absorb all estimated incurred losses in our loan portfolio.

In estimating the specific and general exposure to loss on impaired loans, we have considered a number of factors, including the borrower’s character, overall financial condition, resources and payment record, the prospects for support from any financially responsible guarantors, and the realizable value of any collateral.

We also consider other internal and external factors when determining the allowance for loan losses, which include, but are not limited to, changes in national and local economic conditions, loan portfolio concentrations, and trends in the loan portfolio.

Senior management and the Directors’ Loan Committee review this calculation and the underlying assumptions on a routine basis not less frequently than quarterly.

The allowance for loan losses totaled $1.7 million and $1.6 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company had charge-offs of $488,000, compared to $159,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The total reserve percentage decreased to 1.05% at December 31, 2016 from 1.14% of loans at December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily the result of a reduction in classified assets from the prior year.

Based on an analysis performed by management at December 31, 2016, the allowance for loan losses is considered to be adequate to cover estimated loan losses in the portfolio as of that date. However, management’s judgment is based upon a number of assumptions about future events, which are believed to be reasonable, but which may or may not prove valid. Thus, charge-offs in future periods may exceed the allowance for loan losses or significant additional increases in the allowance for loan losses may be required.

The table below presents a summary of our loan loss experience for the past five years:

(In thousands, except percentages)

 

2016

   

2015

   

2014

   

2013

   

2012

 

Balance at January 1,

 

$

1,564

   

$

1,695

   

$

2,318

   

$

1,338

   

$

1,352

 

Charge-offs:

                                       

Commercial and industrial

   

391

     

-

     

1,138

     

225

     

24

 

Consumer installment

   

97

     

-

     

17

     

1

     

-

 

SBA 7(a)

   

-

     

159

     

-

     

-

     

-

 

Total charge-offs

   

488

     

159

     

1,155

     

226

     

24

 

Recoveries:

                                       

Commercial and industrial

   

19

     

22

     

34

     

3

     

125

 

Consumer installment

   

-

     

-

     

-

     

-

     

26

 

Real estate – construction and land

   

10

     

6

     

6

     

6

     

27

 

SBA 7(a)

   

1

     

-

     

-

     

-

     

-

 

Total recoveries

   

30

     

28

     

40

     

9

     

178

 

Net charge-offs (recoveries)

   

458

     

131

     

1,115

     

217

     

(154

)

Provision (credit) for loan losses

   

589

     

-

     

492

     

1,197

     

(168

)

Balance at December 31,

 

$

1,695

   

$

1,564

   

$

1,695

   

$

2,318

   

$

1,338

 

 

                                       

Loans at year-end

 

$

161,881

   

$

140,794

   

$

127,491

   

$

115,559

   

$

94,396

 

Average loans

   

163,580

     

143,005

     

131,995

     

106,527

     

86,876

 

 

                                       

Net charge-offs (recoveries)/average loans

   

0.28

%

   

0.09

%

   

0.84

%

   

0.20

%

   

-0.18

%

Allowance for loan losses/year-end loans

   

1.05

     

1.14

     

1.33

     

2.05

     

1.42

 

Total provision (credit) for loan losses/average loans

   

0.36

%

   

0.00

%

   

0.37

%

   

1.12

%

   

-0.19

%

The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance for years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the percentage of allocated possible loan losses in each category to total gross loans:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

(In thousands, except percentages)

 

2016

   

2015

 

Allocated:

 

Amount

   

Loan
Category to
Gross Loans

   

Amount

   

Loan
Category to
Gross Loans

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

985

     

50.6

%

 

$

878

     

50.8

%

Consumer installment

   

17

     

2.3

     

26

     

1.5

 

Real estate – residential

   

79

     

4.0

     

86

     

4.9

 

Real estate – commercial

   

241

     

12.4

     

210

     

11.9

 

Real estate – construction and land

   

77

     

3.9

     

130

     

7.3

 

SBA

   

296

     

24.6

     

214

     

20.5

 

USDA

   

-

     

2.2

     

-

     

2.0

 

Other

   

-

     

-

     

20

     

1.1

 

Total allowance for loan losses

 

$

1,695

     

100.0

%

 

$

1,564

     

100.0

%

Sources of Funds

General

Deposits, loan and investment security repayments and prepayments, proceeds from the sale of securities, and cash flows generated from operations are the primary sources of our funds for lending, investing, and other general purposes. Loan repayments are generally a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows tend to fluctuate with prevailing interests rates, markets and economic conditions, and competition.

Deposits

Deposits are attracted principally from our primary geographic market area with the exception of time deposits, which, due to the Bank’s attractive rates, are attracted from across the nation. The Bank offers a broad selection of deposit products, including demand deposit accounts, NOW accounts, money market accounts, regular savings accounts, term certificates of deposit and retirement savings plans (such as IRAs). Deposit account terms vary, with the primary differences being the minimum balance required, the time period the funds must remain on deposit, and the associated interest rates. Management sets the deposit interest rates periodically based on a review of deposit flows and a survey of rates among competitors and other financial institutions. The Bank relies primarily on customer service and long-standing relationships with customers to attract and retain deposits; however, market interest rates and rates offered by competing financial institutions significantly affect the Bank’s ability to attract and retain deposits.

The following table sets forth our average deposit account balances, the percentage of each type of deposit to total deposits, and average cost of funds for each category of deposits:

   

As of December 31,

 
   

2016

   

2015 

 
(In thousands, except percentages)  

Average
Balance

   

Percent of
Deposits

   

Average
Rate

   

Average
Balance

   

Percent of
Deposits

   

Average
Rate

 

Non-interest-bearing deposits

 

$

28,760

     

17.3

%

   

-

%

 

$

24,161

     

17.2

%

   

-

%

NOW accounts

   

6,560

     

3.9

     

0.29

     

5,093

     

3.6

     

0.27

 

Money market accounts

   

39,318

     

23.7

     

0.48

     

37,867

     

26.9

     

0.49

 

Savings accounts

   

5,806

     

3.5

     

0.50

     

5,038

     

3.6

     

0.50

 

Time deposits $100,000 and over

   

81,746

     

49.2

     

1.08

     

64,545

     

45.9

     

0.94

 

Time deposits under $100,000

   

3,924

     

2.4

     

0.99

     

3,919

     

2.8

     

1.05

 

Total deposits

 

$

166,114

     

100.0

%

   

0.70

%

 

$

140,623

     

100.0

%

   

0.62

%

The following table presents maturity of our time deposits of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2016 and 2015:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2016

   

2015

 

Three months or less

 

$

19,748

   

$

18,884

 

Over three months through six months

   

12,375

     

6,763

 

Over six months through twelve months

   

21,942

     

19,967

 

Over twelve months

   

20,246

     

20,924

 

Total

 

$

74,311

   

$

66,538

 

Liquidity

Our liquidity relates to our ability to maintain a steady flow of funds to support our ongoing operating, investing and financing activities. Our Board establishes policies and analyzes and manages liquidity to ensure that adequate funds are available to meet normal operating requirements in addition to unexpected customer demands for funds, such as high levels of deposit withdrawals or loan demand, in a timely and cost-effective manner. The most important factor in the preservation of liquidity is maintaining public confidence that facilitates the retention and growth of a large, stable supply of core deposits and funds. Ultimately, public confidence is generated through profitable operations, sound credit quality and a strong capital position. Liquidity management is viewed from a long-term and a short-term perspective as well as from an asset and liability perspective. We monitor liquidity through a regular review of loan and deposit maturities and forecasts, incorporating this information into a detailed projected cash flow model.

The Bank’s primary sources of funds will be retail and commercial deposits, loan repayments, maturity of investment securities, other short-term borrowings, and other funds provided by operations. While scheduled loan repayments and maturing investments are relatively predictable, deposit flows and loan prepayments are more influenced by interest rates, general economic conditions, and competition. The Bank will maintain investments in liquid assets based upon management’s assessment of (1) the need for funds, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on short-term liquid assets, and (4) objectives of the asset/liability management program.

The Bank had cash and cash equivalents of $12.3 million, or 5.8% of total assets, at December 31, 2016. In addition to the on balance sheet liquidity available, the Bank has lines of credit with the FHLB and the FRB, which provide the Bank with a source of off-balance sheet liquidity. As of December 31, 2016, the Bank’s established credit line with the FHLB was $20.4 million, or 9.6% of assets, of which $6.0 million was utilized. The established credit line with the FRB was $16.3 million, or 7.7% of assets, of which none was utilized or outstanding at December 31, 2016. The Bank’s trust operations serve in a fiduciary capacity for approximately $1.2 billion in total market value of assets as of December 31, 2016. Some of these custody assets are invested in cash. This cash is maintained either in a third party money market mutual fund (invested predominately in U.S. Treasury securities and other high grade investments) or in a Bank money market account. Only cash which is fully insured by the FDIC is maintained at the Bank. This cash can be moved readily between the Bank and the third party money market mutual fund. As of December 31, 2016, there was $22.8 million of cash at the third party money market mutual fund available to transfer to the Bank which would be fully FDIC insured for the trust customers of the Bank.

Capital Resources and Regulatory Capital Requirements

Shareholders’ equity increased $4.0 million during 2016 to $31.2 million at December 31, 2016 from $27.2 million at December 31, 2015. The increase was due to net income of $4.0 million in 2016, and a $199,000 increase in additional paid-in capital related to stock compensation expense, offset by a $233,000 net after-tax decrease in the market value of the securities available for sale.

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s and, accordingly, the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. The regulatory capital ratios as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 were calculated under Basel III rules. As of December 31, 2016, the Company’s capital ratios exceeded the new requirements specified in the Basel III rules.

Quantitative measures established by regulations to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the regulations), common equity Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to average assets (as defined in the regulations).

To be categorized as well-capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, CET1 risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table.

(In thousands)

 

Actual

   

Minimum Capital
Required Under
Basel III
Requirements

   

To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions

 
 

Amount

   

Ratio

   

Amount

   

Ratio

   

Amount

   

Ratio

 

As of December 31, 2016

                                   

Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

 

$

32,001

     

17.19

%

 

$

16,059

     

8.625

%

 

$

18,620

     

10.00

%

 

                                               

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

   

30,306

     

16.28

     

12,335

     

6.625

     

14,896

     

8.00

 

 

                                               

Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk Weighted Assets)

   

30,306

     

16.28

     

9,542

     

5.125

     

12,103

     

6.50

 

 

                                               

Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)

   

30,306

     

14.36

     

8,440

     

4.00

     

10,550

     

5.00

 

 

                                               

As of December 31, 2015

                                               

Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

 

$

27,813

     

18.33

%

 

$

12,139

     

8.00

%

 

$

15,173

     

10.00

%

 

                                               

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

   

26,249

     

17.30

     

9,104

     

6.00

     

12,139

     

8.00

 

 

                                               

Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk Weighted Assets)

   

26,249

     

17.30

     

6,828

     

4.50

     

9,863

     

6.50

 

 

                                               

Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)

   

26,249

     

15.02

     

6,994

     

4.00

     

8,742

     

5.00

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the accompanying balance sheets. Our exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of credit extended is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer and, if deemed necessary, may require collateral.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. At December 31, 2016, we had commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit of approximately $32.9 million and $10,000, respectively.

The following is a summary of our contractual obligations, including certain on-balance-sheet obligations, at December 31, 2016:

 

 

As of December 31, 2016

 

(In thousands)

 

Less than
One Year

   

One to
Three Years

   

Over Three to
Five Years

   

Over Five
Years

   

Total

 

Undisbursed loan commitments

 

$

6,403

   

$

2

   

$

40

   

$

26,423

   

$

32,868

 

Standby letters of credit

   

10

     

-

     

-

     

-

     

10

 

Operating leases

   

12

     

-

     

-

     

-

     

12

 

Time deposits

   

56,164

     

20,799

     

1,256

     

-

     

78,219

 

Borrowed funds

   

6,000

     

-

     

-

     

-

     

6,000

 

Total

 

$

68,589

   

$

20,801

   

$

1,296

   

$

26,423

   

$

117,109

 

Results of Operations

Net Income

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $4.0 million, an increase of approximately $700,000 from net income of $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in net income was driven by a $1.4 million increase in net interest income and a $1.2 million decrease in noninterest expense, which was partially offset by a $955,000 decrease in non-interest income, a $589,000 increase in provision for loan losses and a $396,000 increase in income tax expense.

Details of the changes in the various components of net income for discussed below.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the difference between interest income, principally from loan, lease and investment securities portfolios, and interest expense, principally on customer deposits and borrowings. Changes in net interest income result from changes in volume and spread and are reflected in the net interest margin. Volume refers to the average dollar level of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Spread refers to the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Margin refers to net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets, and is influenced by the level and relative mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

The Federal Reserve influences the general market rates of interest, including the deposit and loan rates offered by many financial institutions. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond the control of the Company, including changes in the expected rate of inflation, the influence of general and local economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States government, its agencies and various other governmental regulatory authorities. In December 2015, the intended federal funds rate increased 25 basis points to 0.50% and remained at that level through most of 2016. In December 2016, the intended federal funds rate increased 25 basis points to 0.75%.

The following table presents the changes in net interest income and identifies the changes due to differences in the average volume of earning assets and interest–bearing liabilities and the changes due to changes in the average interest rate on those assets and liabilities. The changes in net interest income due to changes in both average volume and average interest rate have been allocated to the average volume change or the average interest rate change in proportion to the absolute amounts of the change in each.

 

 

2016 vs 2015

 

 

 

Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in

 

(In thousands)

 

Yield/
Rate

   

Average
Volume

   

Total

 

Interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold

 

$

19

   

$

3

   

$

22

 

Securities

   

153

     

326

     

479

 

Loans, net of unearned discount (1)

   

83

     

1,173

     

1,256

 

Total earning assets

   

255

     

1,502

     

1,757

 

 

                       

NOW

   

1

     

4

     

5

 

Money market

   

(3

)

   

7

     

4

 

Savings

   

-

     

4

     

4

 

Time deposits $100,000 and over

   

93

     

186

     

279

 

Time deposits under $100,000

   

(2

)

   

-

     

(2

)

Borrowed funds

   

13

     

7

     

20

 

Total interest-bearing liabilities

   

102

     

208

     

310

 

Changes in net interest income

 

$

153

   

$

1,294

   

$

1,447

 
 
 

 

 

2015 vs 2014

 

 

 

Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in

 

(In thousands)

 

Yield/
Rate

   

Average
Volume

   

Total

 

Interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold

 

$

1

   

$

2

   

$

3

 

Securities

   

(23

)

   

(2

)

   

(25

)

Loans, net of unearned discount (1)

   

(160

)

   

621

     

461

 

Total earning assets

   

(182

)

   

621

     

439

 

 

                       

NOW

   

(1

)

   

1

     

-

 

Money market

   

-

     

18

     

18

 

Savings

   

-

     

11

     

11

 

Time deposits $100,000 and over

   

61

     

44

     

105

 

Time deposits under $100,000

   

-

     

(2

)

   

(2

)

Borrowed funds

   

5

     

(10

)

   

(5

)

Total interest-bearing liabilities

   

65

     

62

     

127

 

Changes in net interest income

 

$

(247

)

 

$

559

   

$

312

 

(1)
 Average loans include non-accrual.

Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $1.4 million, or 19.4%, compared to 2015. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in the average volume of loans and securities. The average volume of loans increased $20.6 million, or 14.4%, in 2016. The average volume of securities increased $9.2 million, or 44.4%, in 2016, which was comprised of the Property Assessed Clean Energy investments purchased during the second quarter of 2016. Net interest margin increased 3 basis points from 4.61% during 2015 to 4.64% during 2016. The average yield for securities increased 64.4% from 2.16% during 2015 to 3.55% during 2016. The increase was due to the 6.46% yield of the Property Assessed Clean Energy investments during 2016. The average yield for loans increased 6 basis points from 5.64% during 2015 to 5.70% during 2016. Average interest-bearing deposits increased $20.9 million. Time deposits comprised of $17.2 million of the increase. The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits increased 10 basis points from 0.75% during 2015 to 0.85% during 2016.

Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased $312,000, or 4.4%, compared to 2014. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in the average volume of loans, partly offset by a decrease in the net interest margin. The average volume of loans increased $11.0 million, or 8.3%, in 2015. Net interest margin decreased 3.2% to 4.61% for 2015 from 4.76% for 2014. The average yield for loans decreased to 5.64% for 2015, compared to 5.76% for 2014.The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased to 0.73% for 2015, compared to 0.66% for 2014.

The following table sets forth our average balances of assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity, in addition to the major components of net interest income and our net interest margin for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

 

 

Twelve Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

   

2015

 

(In thousands, except percentages)

 

Average
Balance

   

Interest

   

Average
Yield

   

Average
Balance

   

Interest

   

Average
Yield

 

Interest-earning assets

                                   

 

                                   

Loans, net of unearned discount (1)

 

$

163,580

   

$

9,322

     

5.70

%

 

$

143,005

   

$

8,066

     

5.64

%

Interest-bearing deposits and

                                               

federal funds sold

   

8,101

     

42

     

0.52

%

   

7,589

     

20

     

0.26

%

Securities

   

20,117

     

715

     

3.55

%

   

10,951

     

236

     

2.16

%

Total earning assets

   

191,798

     

10,079

     

5.26

%

   

161,545

     

8,322

     

5.15

%

Cash and other assets

   

11,072

                     

10,848

                 

Allowance for loan losses

   

(1,658

)

                   

(1,627

)

               

Total assets

 

$

201,212

                   

$

170,766

                 

 

                                               

Interest-bearing liabilities

                                               

NOW accounts

 

$

6,560

     

19

     

0.29

%

 

$

5,093

     

14

     

0.27

%

Money market accounts

   

39,318

     

190

     

0.48

%

   

37,867

     

186

     

0.49

%

Savings accounts

   

5,806

     

29

     

0.50

%

   

5,038

     

25

     

0.50

%

Time deposits $100,000 and over

   

81,746

     

885

     

1.08

%

   

64,545

     

606

     

0.94

%

Time deposits under $100,000

   

3,924

     

39

     

0.99

%

   

3,919

     

41

     

1.05

%

Total interest-bearing deposits

   

137,354

     

1,162

     

0.85

%

   

116,462

     

872

     

0.75

%

Borrowed funds

   

4,962

     

27

     

0.54

%

   

3,691

     

7

     

0.19

%

Total interest-bearing liabilities

   

142,316

     

1,189

     

0.84

%

   

120,153

     

879

     

0.73

%

Non-interest-bearing deposits

   

28,760

                     

24,161

                 

Other liabilities

   

1,902

                     

1,816

                 

Shareholders’ equity

   

28,234

                     

24,636

                 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

201,212

                   

$

170,766

                 

 

                                               

Net interest income

         

$

8,890

                   

$

7,443

         

Net interest spread

                   

4.42

%

                   

4.42

%

Net interest margin

                   

4.64

%

                   

4.61

%


1)

Includes non-accrual loans 

Provision for Loan Losses

We established a provision for loan losses, which is charged to operations, at a level we believe to be appropriate to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio. For additional information concerning this determination, see the section of this discussion and analysis captioned “Allowance for Loan Losses.”

The provision for loan losses totaled $589,000 in 2016. There was no provision for loan losses recorded in 2015. See the section captioned “Allowance for Loan Losses” elsewhere in this discussion for further analysis of the provision for loan losses.

Non-interest Income

The components of non-interest income for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2016

   

2015

 

Trust income

 

$

10,172

   

$

12,104

 

Gain on sale of loans

   

3,000

     

1,949

 

Loan servicing fees, net

   

335

     

448

 

Service fees and other income

   

105

     

68

 

Rental income

   

310

     

309

 

Loss on sale of securities

   

-

     

(1

)

 

 

$

13,922

   

$

14,877

 

Non-interest income for the year-ended December 31, 2016 decreased $955,000 or 6.4%, compared to the same period in 2015. Changes in the various components of non-interest income are discussed in more detail below.

Trust income decreased $1.9 million, or 16.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2016,compared to the same period in 2015. The decrease in trust income is due to a change in the process for paying fund advisory fees. Prior to July 1, 2016, the investment advisors were paid from fees the Bank collected at the client account level. Beginning in July 2016, the investment advisory expenses are paid directly by the common/collective funds. Therefore, there was a corresponding decrease in trust expense included in non-interest expense. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in fees due to the improvements in market values of assets in trust accounts during 2016.

Gain on sale of loans increased $1.1 million, or 53.9%,for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase was a result of a higher amount of loans sold in 2016 from 2015. The Company sold $35.8 million of SBA and USDA loans during 2016, compared to $21.2 million in 2015.

Loan servicing fees, net of servicing asset amortization decreased $113,000, or 25.2% for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The decrease was related to the payoff of SBA loans resulting in their remaining unamortized serving asset balances being recorded in the income statement for $263,000. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in loan servicing fees related to a higher volume of loans being serviced during 2016.

Service fees and other income increased $37,000, or 54.4% for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase included the receipt of $34,000 of a delinquent interest payment on one Property Assessed Clean Energy (“PACE”) investment. Under the terms of the purchase agreement with the seller of the PACE investments, the Bank did not pay for, but was entitled to receive, the delinquent interest payment on the investment once the payment was collected.

Rental income increased $1,000, or 0.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015.

Non-interest Expense

The components of non-interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

(In thousands) 

 

2016

   

2015

 

Salaries and employee benefits

 

$

5,296

   

$

4,628

 

Occupancy and equipment

   

876

     

852

 

Trust expenses

   

7,716

     

9,708

 

Professional fees

   

556

     

412

 

Data processing

   

898

     

852

 

Other expense

   

701

     

772

 

 

 

$

16,043

   

$

17,224

 

Non-interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased $1.2 million, or 6.9%,compared to the same period in 2015.Changes in the various components of non-interest expense are discussed in more detail below.

Salaries and employee benefits increased $668,000, or 14.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase is due to increase in staff, primarily in the loan production and operational support areas of the Company, increase in incentive bonuses and stock-based compensation, increase in health insurance premium rates and normal annual merit increases.

Occupancy and equipment expense increased $24,000, or 2.8% for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase was primarily due to an increase in telecommunications costs.

Trust expenses are advisory fees paid to a fund advisor to advise the Company on the common trust funds managed by the Company and are based on the value of the assets held in custody. Trust expense decreased $2.0 million, or 20.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015. The decrease is related to the change in the process for paying fund advisory fees explained in non-interest income above. The decrease was partially offset by improvements in market values of the assets during the past year.

Professional fees for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased $144,000, or 35.0%, compared to the same period in 2015. The increase was primarily due to an increase in legal and consulting fees related to the Merger.

Data processing fees increased $46,000, or 5.4% for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015.The increase was related to additional monthly fees pertaining to enhancements to the Company’s internet customer platform and trust processing fees.

Other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased $71,000, or 9.2%,compared to the same period in 2015. The decrease in other expenses was primarily due to decreases in employee recruitment expense, advertising expense among other things.

Income Taxes

The income tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $2.2 million and $1.8 million, respectively. The effective tax rate was 35.6% and 35.4% for 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Additional information regarding income taxes, including a reconciliation of the differences between the recorded income tax provision and the amount of tax computed by applying statutory federal and state income tax rates before income taxes, can be found in Note 10 “Income Taxes” to the consolidated financial statements of this Form 10-K.

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Because we are a smaller reporting company, disclosure under this item is not required.

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

 

 

Page

 

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

44

 

 

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

 

 

          Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

45

 

 

 

          Consolidated Statements of Income

 

46

 

 

 

          Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

 

47

 

 

 

          Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

 

48

 

 

 

          Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

49

 

 

 

          Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

50

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders
T Bancshares, Inc.
Dallas, Texas

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of T Bancshares, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the entity’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purposes of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of T Bancshares, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 

 

 

/s/ WHITLEY PENN LLP

 

 

 

Dallas, Texas

 

March 29, 2017

 

T BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 and 2015

(In thousands, except share amounts)

 

2016

   

2015

 

ASSETS

           

Cash and due from banks

 

$

2,803

   

$

1,592

 

Interest-bearing deposits

   

9,492

     

6,687

 

Federal funds sold

   

23

     

431

 

Total cash and cash equivalents

   

12,318

     

8,710

 

Securities available for sale at estimated fair value

   

10,753

     

12,452

 

Securities held to maturity

   

9,668

     

 

Securities, restricted at cost

   

1,054

     

1,046

 

Loans held for sale

   

11,225

     

6,365

 

Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $1,695 and $1,564, respectively

   

158,708

     

137,648

 

Bank premises and equipment, net

   

4,566

     

4,497

 

Deferred tax assets, net

   

607

     

527

 

Receivable for loans sold

   

-

     

1,972

 

Other assets

   

4,196

     

3,712

 

Total assets

 

$

213,095

   

$

176,929

 

 

               

LIABILITIES

               

Demand deposits:

               

Non-interest-bearing

 

$

38,349

   

$

24,138

 

Interest-bearing

   

58,107

     

42,292

 

Time deposits $100,000 and over

   

74,311

     

66,538

 

Time deposits under $100,000

   

3,908

     

4,067

 

Total deposits

   

174,675

     

137,035

 

Borrowed funds

   

6,000

     

10,000

 

Other liabilities

   

1,263

     

2,684

 

Total liabilities

   

181,938

     

149,719

 

 

               

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

               
Common Stock, $ .01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 4,051,657 and 4,037,907 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively
    40       40  

Additional paid-in capital

   

22,961

     

22,762

 

Retained earnings

   

8,379

     

4,398

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   

(223

)

   

10

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   

31,157

     

27,210

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

213,095

   

$

176,929

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

T BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 and 2015

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

2016

   

2015

 

Interest Income

           

Loan, including fees

 

$

9,322

   

$

8,066

 

Securities

   

715

     

236

 

Federal funds sold

   

2

     

1

 

Interest-bearing deposits

   

40

     

19

 

Total interest income

   

10,079

     

8,322

 

Interest Expense

               

Deposits

   

1,162

     

872

 

Borrowed funds

   

27

     

7

 

Total interest expense

   

1,189

     

879

 

Net interest income

   

8,890

     

7,443

 

Provision for loan losses

   

589

     

-

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

   

8,301

     

7,443

 

Non-interest Income

               

Trust income

   

10,172

     

12,104

 

Gain on sale of loans

   

3,000

     

1,949

 

Loan servicing fees, net

   

335

     

448

 

Service fees and other income

   

105

     

68

 

Rental income

   

310

     

309

 

Loss on sale of securities

   

-

     

(1

)

Total non-interest income

   

13,922

     

14,877

 

Non-interest Expense

               

Salaries and employee benefits

   

5,296

     

4,628

 

Occupancy and equipment

   

876

     

852

 

Trust expenses

   

7,716

     

9,708

 

Professional fees

   

556

     

412

 

Data processing

   

898

     

852

 

Other

   

701

     

772

 

Total non-interest expense

   

16,043

     

17,224

 

Income before income taxes

   

6,180

     

5,096

 

Income tax expense

   

2,199

     

1,803

 

Net Income

 

$

3,981

   

$

3,293

 

 

               

Earnings per common share:

               

Basic

   

0.98

     

0.82

 

Diluted

   

0.98

     

0.81

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

   

4,045,120

     

4,034,105

 

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

   

4,062,470

     

4,043,876

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

T BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 and 2015

(In thousands)

 

2016

   

2015

 

Net Income

 

$

3,981

   

$

3,293

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

               

Change in unrealized gain on investment securities available-for-sale

   

(353

)

   

32

 

Reclassification adjustment for realized loss on sale included in net income

   

-

     

1

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss), before tax effect

   

(353

)

   

33

 

Tax effect

   

(120

)

   

11

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   

(233

)

   

22

 

Comprehensive income

 

$

3,748

   

$

3,315

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

T BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 and 2015

(In thousands)
 
Common
Stock
   
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
   
Retained Earnings
   
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
   
Total
 
BALANCE, January 1, 2015
 
$
40
   
$
22,664
   
$
1,105
   
$
(12
)
 
$
23,797
 
Net income
                   
3,293
             
3,293
 
Other comprehensive income
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
22
     
22
 
Issuance of 7,975 shares in connection with the directors’ common stock plan
   
-
     
58
     
-
     
-
     
58
 
Stock based compensation
   
-
     
40
     
-
     
-
     
40
 
BALANCE, December 31, 2015
 
$
40
   
$
22,762
   
$
4,398
   
$
10
   
$
27,210
 
Net income
   
-
     
-
     
3,981
     
-
     
3,981
 
Other comprehensive loss
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
(233
)
   
(233
)
Issuance of 13,750 shares in connection with the directors’ common stock plan
   
-
     
97
     
-
     
-
     
97
 
Stock based compensation
   
-
     
102
     
-
     
-
     
102
 
BALANCE, December 31, 2016
 
$
40
   
$
22,961
   
$
8,379
   
$
(223
)
 
$
31,157
 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

T BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 and 2015

(In thousands)

 

2016

   

2015

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

           

Net income

 

$

3,981

   

$

3,293

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

               

Provision for loan losses

   

589

     

-

 

Depreciation and amortization

   

215

     

226

 

Accretion of discount on loans

   

(173

)

   

(146

)

Securities premium amortization (discount accretion), net

   

75

     

(11

)

Net loss on sale of securities

   

-

     

1

 

Origination of loans held for sale

   

(41,976

)

   

(23,239

)

Proceeds from payments and sales of loans held for sale

   

39,283

     

23,488

 

Net gain on sale of loans

   

(3,000

)

   

(1,949

)

Stock based compensation

   

199

     

98

 

Receivable for sold loans

   

1,972

     

6,213

 

Deferred income taxes

   

40

     

261

 

Servicing asset amortization

   

422

     

125

 

Net change in:

               

Other assets

   

(73

)

   

(123

)

Other liabilities

   

(1,421

)

   

(868

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

   

133

     

7,369

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

               

Purchase of securities available for sale

   

(234,627

)

   

(195,501

)

Principal payments, calls and maturities of securities available for sale

   

235,908

     

1,885

 

Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale

   

-

     

190,000

 

Purchase of securities held to maturity

   

(9,913

)

   

-

 

Principal payments of securities held to maturity

   

235

     

-

 

Purchase of securities, restricted

   

(6,818

)

   

(8,342

)

Proceeds from sale of securities, restricted

   

6,810

     

8,334

 

Net change in loans

   

(21,476

)

   

(13,097

)

Purchases of premises and equipment

   

(284

)

   

(171

)

Net cash used in investing activities

   

(30,165

)

   

(16,892

)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

               

Net change in demand deposits

   

30,026

     

4,059

 

Net change in time deposits

   

7,614

     

7,242

 

Proceeds from borrowed funds

   

325,000

     

248,634

 

Repayment of borrowed funds

   

(329,000

)

   

(248,634

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

   

33,640

     

11,301

 

 Net change in cash and cash equivalents

   

3,608

     

1,778

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   

8,710

     

6,932

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

$

12,318

   

$

8,710

 

 

               

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information

               

Cash paid during the period for:

               

Interest

 

$

1,180

   

$

878

 

Income taxes

 

$

2,565

   

$

2,020

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization and Nature of Operations

T Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of T Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, T Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”). The Company’s financial condition and operating results principally reflect those of the Bank. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.

The Bank serves its local geographic market which includes Dallas, Tarrant, Denton, Collin and Rockwall counties which encompass an area commonly referred to as the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. The Bank also serves the dental and other health professional industries through a centralized loan and deposit platform that operates out of its main office in Dallas, Texas. In addition, the Bank serves the small business community by offering loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”).

The Bank offers a broad range of commercial and consumer banking services primarily to small to medium-sized businesses and their employees. Because of the Bank’s technological capabilities, including worldwide free ATM withdrawals, sophisticated on-line banking capabilities, electronic funds transfer capabilities, and economical remote deposit solutions, most customers can be served regardless of their geographic location.

At December 31, 2016, the Bank’s loan portfolio consisted of approximately $71.6 million, or 44.2% of the loan portfolio, in loans to dentists and dental practices. Substantially all loans are secured by specific collateral, including business assets, consumer assets, and commercial real estate.

The Bank also offers traditional fiduciary services primarily to clients of Cain Watters & Associates L.L.C. The Bank, Cain Watters & Associates L.L.C., and Tectonic Advisors, L.L.C. have entered into an advisory services agreement related to the trust operations.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and/or disclosure through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period, as well as the disclosures provided. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates. The determination of the allowance for loan losses, the fair value of stock options, the fair values of financial instruments and other real estate owned, and the status of contingencies are particularly susceptible to significant change in recorded amounts.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and does not believe it is exposed to significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits with other financial institutions, and federal funds sold. Net cash flows are reported for customer loan and deposit transactions.

Trust Assets

Property held for customers in a fiduciary capacity, other than trust cash on deposit at the Bank, is not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements since such items are not assets of the Company.

Securities

Securities are classified as held to maturity and carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and ability to hold them until maturity. Securities to be held for indefinite periods of time are classified as available for sale and carried at fair value, with the unrealized holding gains and losses reported as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax. Securities held for resale are classified as trading and are carried at fair value, with changes in unrealized holding gains and losses included in income. Management determines the appropriate classification of securities at the time of purchase.

Securities with limited marketability, such as stock in the FRB and the FHLB, are carried at cost. The Company has investments in stock of the FRB and the FHLB as is required for participation in the services offered. These investments are classified as restricted and are recorded at cost.

Interest income includes amortization of purchase premiums and accretion of purchase discounts. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized on the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments. Gains and losses are recorded on the trade date and determined using the specific identification method. Declines in the fair value of available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent the impairment related to credit losses. The amount of impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers, among other things, (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (iii) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery of amortized cost. 

Loans Held for Sale

Loans which are originated or purchased and are intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value determined on an aggregate basis. Valuation adjustments, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to non-interest income and direct loan origination costs and fees are deferred at origination of the loan and are recognized in non-interest income upon sale of the loan. Loans held for sale are comprised of the guaranteed portion of SBA and USDA loans. The Company did not incur a lower of cost or market valuation provision in the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Loans

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at the principal balance outstanding, net of unearned interest, unearned discount, deferred loan fees, and allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Discount on acquired loans and loan origination fees are deferred and recognized in interest income using the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments.

Interest income on commercial business and commercial real estate loans is discontinued when the loan becomes 90 days delinquent unless the credit is well secured and in process of collection. Unsecured consumer loans are generally charged off when the loan becomes 90 days past due. Consumer loans secured by collateral other than real estate are charged off after a review of all factors affecting the ability to collect on the loan, including the borrower’s history, overall financial condition, resources, guarantor support, and the realizable value of any collateral. However, any consumer loan past due 180 days is charged off. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on non-accrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on non-accrual are reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on a cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual basis. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses, increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs less recoveries. Management estimates the allowance balance required by considering the collectability of loans based on historical experience and the borrower’s ability to repay, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and the estimated value of any underlying collateral, economic conditions and other factors.

The allowance consists of general and specific reserves. The specific component relates to loans that are individually evaluated and determined to be impaired. This amount of allowance is often based on variables affecting valuation, appraisals of collateral, evaluations of performance and status, and the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received. The general component relates to the entire group of loans that are evaluated in the aggregate based primarily on industry historical loss experience adjusted for current economic factors. To the extent actual loan losses differ materially from management’s estimate of these subjective factors, loan growth/run-off accelerates, or the mix of loan types changes, the level of the provision for loan loss, and related allowance can, and will, fluctuate.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include, among others, payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loan impairment on loans is generally based upon the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s initial effective interest rate, unless the loans are collateral dependent, in which case loan impairment is based upon the fair value of collateral less estimated selling costs.

Bank Premises and Equipment

Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Buildings and related components are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from 5 to 39 years. Furniture and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from 3 to 10 years. Land improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from 3 to 10 years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over the lease term or estimated life, whichever is shorter. Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Foreclosed Assets

Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. Costs after acquisition are generally expensed. If the fair value of the asset declines, a write-down is recorded through expense. The valuation of foreclosed assets is subjective in nature and may be adjusted in the future because of changes in economic conditions. The Company had no foreclosed assets at December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Servicing Rights

The guaranteed portion of certain SBA and USDA loans can be sold into the secondary market. Servicing rights are recognized as separate assets when loans are sold with servicing retained. Servicing rights are amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated future net servicing income. The Company uses industry prepayment statistics in estimating the expected life of the loans. Management evaluates its servicing rights for impairment quarterly. Servicing rights are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost. Fair value is determined using discounted future cash flows calculated on a loan-by-loan basis and aggregated by predominate risk characteristics. The initial servicing rights and resulting gain on sale are calculated based on the difference between the best actual par and premium bids on an individual loan basis.

Stock Based Compensation

At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company has a share-based employee compensation plan, which is described more fully in Note 11.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, advertising expense totaled $2,400 and $21,000, respectively, which is in included in non-interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes utilizing the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company accounts for uncertainties in income taxes in accordance with current accounting guidance which prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Benefits from tax positions should be recognized in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured at the largest amount of cumulative benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be derecognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. No uncertain tax positions have been recognized.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and state jurisdictions, as applicable.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents. Common share equivalents consist of stock options and are computed using the treasury stock method.

Outstanding stock options of 62,000 were considered in the diluted earnings per share computations for the year ended December 31, 2016, however the remaining 202,500 outstanding options were not considered in the per share computation because their effect was anti-dilutive. Outstanding stock options of 19,000 were considered in the diluted earnings per share computations for the year ended December 31, 2015, however the remaining 409,000 outstanding options were not considered in the per share computation because their effect was anti-dilutive.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) includes net unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, which are recognized as a separate component of equity. Accumulated comprehensive income (loss), net for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 is reported in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Transfer of Financial Assets

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (i) the assets have been isolated from the Company, (ii) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (iii) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

Loss Contingencies

Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in a separate note. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain items in prior financial statements have been reclassified to provide more comparative information. These reclassifications had no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” ASU 2014-09 implements a common revenue standard that clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 was originally going to be effective for the Company on January 1, 2017; however, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) recently issued ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) – Deferral of the Effective Date” which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 to January 1, 2018. The Company’s revenue is comprised of net interest income on financial assets and financial liabilities, which is explicitly excluded from the scope of ASU 2014-09, and non-interest income. The Company expects that ASU 2014-09 will require a change in how the Company recognizes certain recurring revenue streams within trust management fees; however, these changes are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of ASU 2014-09 on other components of non-interest income and expects to adopt the standard in the first quarter of 2018 with a cumulative effective adjustment to opening retained earnings, if such adjustment is deemed to be significant.

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-01, “Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20) – Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items.” ASU 2015-01 eliminates from U.S. GAAP the concept of extraordinary items, which, among other things, required an entity to segregate extraordinary items considered to be unusual and infrequent from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. ASU 2015-01 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2016, and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10) - Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. ASU 2016-1, among other things, (i) requires equity investments, with certain exceptions, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, (ii) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment, (iii) eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet, (iv) requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, (v) requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments, (vi) requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements and (viii) clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale. ASU 2016-1 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” ASU 2016-02 will, among other things, require lessees to recognize a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. ASU 2016-02 does not significantly change lease accounting requirements applicable to lessors; however, certain changes were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model. ASU 2016-2 will be effective on January 1, 2019 and will require transition using a modified retrospective approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The Company continues to evaluate the provision of the new lease standard but, due to the small number of lease agreements presently in effect for the Company, has concluded the new guidance will not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016- 09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.”  ASU 2016-09 will amend current guidance such that all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies related to share-based payment awards will be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement during the period in which they occur. Additionally, excess tax benefits will be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity rather than a financing activity. ASU 2016-09 also provides that any entity can make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest, which is the current requirement, or account for forfeitures when they occur. ASU 2016-09 will be effective on January 1, 2017 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” ASU 2016-13 requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts and requires enhanced disclosures related to the significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization’s portfolio. In addition, ASU 2016-13 amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. ASU 2016-13 will be effective on January 1, 2020. While the Company generally expects that the implementation of ASU 2016-13 may increase their allowance for loan losses balance, the Company is continuing to evaluate the potential impact of ASU 2016-13 on its financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” ASU 2016-15 provides guidance related to certain cash flow issues in order to reduce the current and potential future diversity in practice. ASU 2016-15 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.” ASU 2016-16 provides guidance stating that an entity should recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 will be effective on January 1, 2018 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Restricted Cash.” ASU 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 will be effective on January 1, 2018 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) - Clarifying the Definition of a Business.” ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition and provides a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities constitutes a business. ASU 2017-01 is intended to provide guidance when evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 will be effective on January 1, 2018 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

NOTE 2. SECURITIES

Year-end securities consisted of the following:

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

(In thousands)

 

Amortized
Cost

   

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

   

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

   

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Securities available for sale:

                       

U.S. government agencies

 

$

8,247

   

$

33

   

$

319

   

$

7,961

 

Mortgage-backed securities

   

2,844

     

16

     

68

     

2,792

 

Total securities available for sale

 

$

11,091

   

$

49

   

$

387

   

$

10,753

 

 

                               

Securities held to maturity:

                               

Property assessed clean energy

 

$

9,668

   

$

-

   

$

-

   

$

9,668

 

 

                               

Securities, restricted:

                               

Other

 

$

1,054

   

$

-

   

$

-

   

$

1,054

 
   

December 31, 2015

 
(In thousands)
 
Amortized
Cost
   
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Securities available for sale:
                       
U.S. government agencies
 
$
9,155
   
$
70
   
$
63
   
$
9,162
 
Mortgage-backed securities
   
3,284
     
30
     
24
     
3,290
 
Total securities available for sale
 
$
12,439
   
$
100
   
$
87
   
$
12,452
 
                                 
Securities, restricted:
                               
Other
 
$
1,046
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
1,046
 

All mortgage-backed securities included in the above table were issued by U.S. government agencies, or by U.S. government-sponsored agencies. Securities, restricted consists of FRB and FHLB stock which are carried at cost.

Securities with a fair value of $787,000 and $982,000 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, were pledged against trust deposit balances held at the Company’s insured depository subsidiary, T Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”). Securities with a fair value of $567,000 and $699,000 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, were pledged to the FRB. Securities with a fair value of $9.4 million and $10.8 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, were pledged to secure borrowings at the FHLB. 

The Bank held Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas stock in the amount of $570,000 at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The Bank also held Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas stock in the amount of $484,000 and $476,000 at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Certain investments in debt securities are reported in the financial statement at an amount less than their historical cost. The table below indicates the length of time individual investment securities have been in a continuous loss position as of December 31, 2016 and 2015: 

   
December 31, 2016
 
   
Less than 12 months
   
12 months or longer
   
Total
 
(In thousands)
 
Fair Value
   
Unrealized
Losses
   
Fair Value
   
Unrealized
Losses
   
Fair Value
   
Unrealized
Losses
 
U.S. government agencies
 
$
5,601
   
$
310
   
$
363
   
$
9
   
$
5,964
   
$
319
 
Mortgage-backed securities
   
2,175
     
68
     
-
     
-
     
2,175
     
68
 
Total
 
$
7,776
   
$
378
   
$
363
   
$
9
   
$
8,139
   
$
387
 
   
December 31, 2015
 
   
Less than 12 months
   
12 months or longer
   
Total
 
(In thousands)
 
Fair Value
   
Unrealized
Losses
   
Fair Value
   
Unrealized
Losses
   
Fair Value
   
Unrealized
Losses
 
U.S. government agencies
 
$
5,005
   
$
32
   
$
970
   
$
31
   
$
5,975
   
$
63
 
Mortgage-backed securities
   
1,981
     
24
     
-
     
-
     
1,981
     
24
 
Total
 
$
6,986
   
$
56
   
$
970
   
$
31
   
$
7,956
   
$
87
 
 
The number of investment positions in this unrealized loss position totaled nine at December 31, 2016. The Company does not believe these unrealized losses are “other than temporary” as (i) it does not have the intent to sell the securities prior to recovery and/or maturity and, (ii) it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell the securities prior to recovery and/or maturity. In making this determination, the Company also considers the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than cost and the financial condition of the issuer. The unrealized losses noted are primarily interest rate related due to the level of interest rates at December 31, 2016 compared to the time of purchase. The Company has reviewed the ratings of the issuers and has not identified any issues related to the ultimate repayment of principal as a result of credit concerns on these securities. The Company’s mortgage related securities are backed by GNMA and FNMA or are collateralized by securities backed by these agencies.

As of December 31, 2016, management does not have the intent to sell any of the securities classified as available for sale in the table above and believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell any such securities before a recovery of amortized cost. Any unrealized losses are largely due to increases in market interest rates over the yields available at the time the underlying securities were purchased. The fair value is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity date or repricing date or if market yields for such investments decline. Management does not believe any of the securities are impaired due to reasons of credit quality. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2016, management believes the impairments detailed in the table above are temporary and no impairment loss has been realized in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

Sale of securities available-for-sale were as follows:

(In thousands)  

2016

   

2015

 

Proceeds from sales

 

$

-

   

$

190,000

 
   

 

     

 

 

Gross realized losses

   

-

     

(1

)

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities at December 31, 2016 are presented below by contractual maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. Residential mortgage backed securities are shown separately since they are not due at a single maturity date.

   
Available-for-Sale
   
Held-to-Maturity
 
 
 
Amortized
   
Estimated
   
Amortized
   
Estimated
 
(In thousands)
 
Cost
   
Fair Value
   
Cost
   
Fair Value
 
Due after one year through five years
 
$
1,019
   
$
1,015
   
$
370
   
$
370
 
Due after five years through ten years
   
6,686
     
6,379
     
4,522
     
4,522
 
Due after ten years
   
542
     
567
     
4,776
     
4,776
 
Mortgage-backed securities
   
2,844
     
2,792
     
-
     
-
 
Total
 
$
11,091
   
$
10,753
   
$
9,668
   
$
9,668
 

NOTE 3. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

Major classifications of loans held for investment are as follows:

 

           

(In thousands)

 

December 31,
2016

   

December 31,
2015

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

81,945

   

$

71,562

 

Consumer installment

   

3,749

     

2,049

 

Real estate – residential

   

6,531

     

6,851

 

Real estate – commercial

   

20,042

     

16,736

 

Real estate – construction and land

   

6,335

     

10,322

 

SBA:

               

SBA 7(a) unguaranteed portion

   

29,859

     

22,596

 

SBA 504

   

9,825

     

6,349

 

USDA

   

3,589

     

2,787

 

Other

   

6

     

1,542

 

Gross Loans

   

161,881

     

140,794

 

Less:

               

Allowance for loan losses

   

1,695

     

1,564

 

Deferred loan costs, net

   

(617

)

   

(292

)

Discount on loans

   

2,095

     

1,874

 

Net loans

 

$

158,708

   

$

137,648

 

At December 31, 2016, our loan portfolio included $71.6 million of loans, approximately 44.2% of our total funded loans, to the dental industry, as compared to $61.6 million, or 43.7% of total funded loans, at December 31, 2015. We believe that these loans are to credit worthy borrowers and are diversified geographically.

Periodically, the Company purchases participation interests in residential 1-4 family real estate mortgage loans that are partially or fully government guaranteed from a third party who is an approved Ginnie Mae securities issuer (the “Issuer”). Under the arrangement with the Issuer, in the event the Issuer subsequently pools the loans into a newly issued Ginnie Mae security, the Bank is entitled to receive a fractional percentage varying between 10% and 25% of the ultimate sales price of the securities over the Bank’s basis in the participation interest net of any unearned discount at the time of the securitization. If the loans are not securitized by the Issuer, the discount is accreted to interest income on a level-yield method over the life of the loans. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company purchased participation interest in one loan for $205,800 at a discount of $7,300. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company purchased participation interests in two loans totaling $173,700 at a discount of $5,200. There were no loans securitized during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and as a result no gain was recognized. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the unearned discount was $141,000 and $248,000, respectively.

The Bank offers services to serve the small business community by offering 7(a) loans guaranteed by the SBA, loans promulgated under the SBA’s 504 loan program, and loans guaranteed by the USDA. These loans are generally guaranteed by the Agencies up to 75% to 80% of the principal balance. The Company records the guaranteed portion of the loans as held for sale. The Company periodically sells the guaranteed portion of selected SBA and USDA loans into the secondary market, on a servicing-retained basis. In calculating gain on the sale of loans, the Company performs an allocation based on the relative fair values of the sold portion and retained portion of the loan. The Company’s assumptions are validated by reference to external market information.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company sold $35.8 million of SBA and USDA loans, resulting in a gain on sale of loans of $3.0 million. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company sold $21.2 million of SBA loans, resulting in a gain on sale of loans of $1.9 million. In connection with the sales, the Company recorded a servicing asset of $833,000 and $493,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had $11.2 million of SBA loans held for sale. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had $6.4 million of SBA loans held for sale.

During December 2015, the Bank sold one SBA loan that did not settle until January 2016. At December 31, 2015, the Bank recorded a receivable for the loans sold of approximately $2.0 million, which consists of approximately $1.8 million for the principal balance of the loan and $188,000 for the premium amount.

Loan Origination/Risk Management.

The Bank maintains written loan origination policies, procedures, and processes which address credit quality at several levels including individual loan level, loan type, and loan portfolio levels.

Commercial and industrial loans, which are predominantly loans to dentists, are underwritten based on historical and projected income of the business and individual borrowers and guarantors. The Bank utilizes a comprehensive global debt service coverage analysis to determine debt service coverage ratios. This analysis compares global cash flow of the borrowers and guarantors on an individual credit to existing and proposed debt after consideration of personal and business related other expenses. Collateral is generally a lien on all available assets of the business borrower including intangible assets. Credit worthiness of individual borrowers and guarantors is established through the use of credit reports and credit scores.

Consumer loans are evaluated on the basis of credit worthiness as established through the use of credit reports and credit scores. Additional credit quality indicators include borrower debt to income ratios based on verifiable income sources.

Real estate mortgage loans are evaluated based on collateral value as well as global debt service coverage ratios based on historical and projected income from all related sources including the collateral property, the borrower, and all guarantors where applicable.

Small Business Administration Lending- The Bank originates SBA loans which are sometimes sold into the secondary market. The Bank continues to service these loans after sale and is required under the SBA programs to retain specified amounts. The two primary SBA loan programs that the Bank offers are the basic 7(a) Loan Guaranty and the Certified Development Company (“CDC”), a Section 504 (“504”) program.

The 7(a) serves as the SBA’s primary business loan program to help qualified small businesses obtain financing when they might not be eligible for business loans through normal lending channels. Loan proceeds under this program can be used for most business purposes including working capital, machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, land and building (including purchase, renovation and new construction), leasehold improvements and debt refinancing. Loan maturity is generally up to 10 years for working capital and up to 25 years for fixed assets. The 7(a) loan is approved and funded by a qualified lender, guaranteed by the SBA and subject to applicable regulations. In general, the SBA guarantees up to 75% of the loan amount depending on loan size. The Bank is required by the SBA to retain a contractual minimum of 5% on all SBA 7(a) loans. The SBA 7(a) loans are generally variable interest rate loans. Gains recognized by the Bank on the sales of the guaranteed portion of these loans and the ongoing servicing income received are significant revenue sources for the Company. The servicing spread is 1% on the majority of loans.

The 504 program is an economic development-financing program providing long-term, low down payment loans to expanding businesses. Typically, a 504 project includes a loan secured from a private-sector lender with a senior lien, a loan secured from a CDC (funded by a 100% SBA-guaranteed debenture) with a junior lien covering up to 40% of the total cost, and a contribution of at least 10% equity from the borrower. Debenture limits are $5.0 million for regular 504 loans and $5.5 million for those 504 loans that meet a public policy goal.

The SBA has designated the Bank as a “Preferred Lender”. As a Preferred Lender, the Bank has been delegated loan approval, closing and most servicing and liquidation authority responsibility from the SBA.

The Bank also offers Business & Industry (“B & I”) program loans through the USDA. These loans are similar to the SBA product, except they are guaranteed by the USDA. The guaranteed amount is generally 75%. B&I loans are made to businesses in designated rural areas and are generally larger loans to larger businesses than the SBA 7(a) loans. Similar to the SBA 7(a) product, they can be sold into the secondary market. These loans can be utilized for rural commercial real estate and equipment. The loans can have maturities up to 30 years and the rates can be fixed or variable.

Construction and land development loans are evaluated based on the borrower’s and guarantor’s credit worthiness, past experience in the industry, track record and experience with the type of project being considered, and other factors. Collateral value is determined generally by independent appraisal utilizing multiple approaches to determine value based on property type.

For all loan types, the Bank establishes guidelines for its underwriting criteria including collateral coverage ratios, global debt service coverage ratios, and maximum amortization or loan maturity terms.

At the portfolio level, the Bank monitors concentrations of loans based on several criteria including loan type, collateral type, industry, geography, and other factors. The Bank also performs periodic market research and economic analysis at a local geographic and national level. Based on this research, the Bank may from time to time change the minimum or benchmark underwriting criteria applied to the above loan types.

Loans are placed on non-accrual status when, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet payment obligations as they become due, as well as when required by regulatory provisions. Loans may be placed on non-accrual status regardless of whether or not such loans are considered past due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. A loan may be returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future principal and interest amounts contractually due are reasonably assured, which is typically evidenced by a sustained period (at least six months) of repayment performance by the borrower.

Year-end non-accrual loans and restructured loans, segregated by class of loans, were as follows:

 
 
December 31,
   
December 31,
 
(In thousands)
 
2016
    2015  
Non-accrual  loans:
           
Commercial and industrial
 
$
39
   
$
443
 
SBA    
-
     
477
 
Total non-accrual loans
   
39
     
920
 
SBA guaranteed portion
   
-
     
(477
)
Total non-accrual loans, net
   
39
     
443
 
Restructured  loans:
               
Commercial and industrial
 
$
9
   
$
381
 
 

The restructuring of a loan is considered a “troubled debt restructuring” if due to the borrower’s financial difficulties, we have granted a concession that we would not otherwise consider. This may include a transfer of real estate or other assets from the borrower, a modification of loan terms, or a combination of the two. Modification of loan terms may include interest rate reductions or below market interest rates, principal forgiveness, restructuring amortization schedules, reductions in collateral and other actions intended to minimize potential losses.

As of December 31, 2016, there was one commercial and industrial loan with a balance of approximately $9,000, which was on non-accrual, identified as troubled debt restructuring. The loan was restructured with a pre-modification balance of $16,000 during the second quarter of 2016. The modification included an extension of maturity date and reduction of payment amount. There were no other new troubled debt restructurings during 2016.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company had one commercial and industrial loan restructuring for $381,000 which was on non-accrual, with related allowance for loan losses of $2,000, identified as troubled debt restructuring. The modification consisted of extending the amortization period and reducing the interest rate to a below market interest rate. The loan defaulted and the outstanding balance of $344,000 was charged off during the second quarter of 2016.A default for purposes of this disclosure is a troubled debt restructured loan in which the borrower is 90 days past due or results in the foreclosure and repossession of the applicable collateral. There were no new troubled debt restructurings during 2015, and there were no troubled debt restructurings that defaulted under the modified terms during the year ended December 31, 2015.

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had no commitments to lend additional funds to loan customers whose terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings.

Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled principal and interest payments. If a loan is impaired, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Interest payments on impaired loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount is reasonably assured, in which case interest is recognized on a cash basis. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible.

The Company’s impaired loans and related allowance is summarized in the following table:

 
 
Unpaid
   
Recorded
   
Recorded
                         
 
 
Contractual
   
Investment
   
Investment
   
Total
         
Average
   
Interest
 
 
 
Principal
   
With No
   
With
   
Recorded
   
Related
   
Recorded
   
Income
 
(In thousands)
 
Balance
   
Allowance
   
Allowance
   
Investment
   
Allowance
   
Investment
   
Recognized
 
December 31, 2016
                                   
Commercial and industrial
 
$
460
   
$
9
   
$
332
   
$
341
   
$
20
   
$
525
   
$
24
 
Real estate – commercial
   
121
     
121
     
-
     
121
     
-
     
130
     
6
 
SBA
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
199
     
-
 
Total
 
$
581
   
$
130
   
$
332
   
$
462
   
$
20
   
$
854
   
$
30
 
                                                         
December 31, 2015
                                                       
Commercial and industrial
 
$
908
   
$
-
   
$
678
   
$
678
   
$
26
   
$
1,431
   
$
73
 
Real estate – commercial
   
137
     
137
     
-
     
137
     
-
     
146
     
7
 
SBA
   
477
     
477
     
-
     
477
     
-
     
159
     
-
 
Total
 
$
1,522
   
$
614
   
$
678
   
$
1,292
   
$
26
   
$
1,736
   
$
80
 

Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. The Company’s past due loans are as follows:

 
                               
Total 90
 
 
 
30-89 Days
   
Greater Than
   
Total
   
Total
   
Total
   
Days Past Due
 
(In thousands)
 
Past Due
   
90 Days
   
Past Due
   
Current
   
Loans
   
Still Accruing
 
December 31, 2016
                                   
Commercial and industrial
 
$
261
   
$
-
   
$
261
   
$
81,684
   
$
81,945
   
$
-
 
Consumer installment
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
3,749
     
3,749
     
-
 
Real estate – residential
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
6,531
     
6,531
     
-
 
Real estate – commercial
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
20,042
     
20,042
     
-
 
Real estate – construction and  land
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
6,335
     
6,335
     
-
 
SBA
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
39,684
     
39,684
     
-
 
USDA
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
3,589
     
3,589
     
-
 
Other
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
6
     
6
     
-
 
Total
 
$
261
   
$
-
   
$
261
   
$
161,620
   
$
161,881
   
$
-
 
                                                 
December 31, 2015
                                               
Commercial and industrial
 
$
555
   
$
-
   
$
555
   
$
71,007
   
$
71,562
   
$
-
 
Consumer installment
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
2,049
     
2,049
     
-
 
Real estate – residential
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
6,851
     
6,851
     
-
 
Real estate – commercial
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
16,736
     
16,736
     
-
 
Real estate – construction and  land
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
10,322
     
10,322
     
-
 
SBA
   
-
     
477
     
477
     
28,468
     
28,945
     
-
 
USDA
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
2,787
     
2,787
     
-
 
Other
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
1,542
     
1,542
     
-
 
Total
 
$
555
   
$
477
   
$
1,032
   
$
139,762
   
$
140,794
   
$
-
 
 
 
As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including internal credit risk based on past experiences as well as external statistics and factors. Loans are graded in one of six categories: (i) pass, (ii) pass-watch, (iii) special mention, (iv) substandard, (v) doubtful, or (vi) loss. Loans graded as loss are charged-off.

The classifications of loans reflect a judgment about the risks of default and loss associated with the loan. The Company reviews the ratings on credits quarterly. No significant changes were made to the loan risk grading system definitions and allowance for loan loss methodology during the past year. Ratings are adjusted to reflect the degree of risk and loss that is felt to be inherent in each credit. The Company’s methodology is structured so that specific allocations are increased in accordance with deterioration in credit quality (and a corresponding increase in risk and loss) or decreased in accordance with improvement in credit quality (and a corresponding decrease in risk and loss).

Credits rated pass are acceptable loans, appropriately underwritten, bearing an ordinary risk of loss to the Bank. Loans in this category are loans to quality borrowers with financial statements presenting a good primary source as well as an adequate secondary source of repayment.

Credits rated pass-watch loans have been determined to require enhanced monitoring for potential weaknesses which require further investigation. They have no significant delinquency in the past twelve months. This rating causes the loan to be actively monitored with greater frequency than pass loans and allows appropriate downgrade transition if verifiable adverse events are confirmed. This category may also include loans that have improved in credit quality from special mention but are not yet considered pass loans.

Credits rated special mention show clear signs of financial weaknesses or deterioration in credit worthiness, however, such concerns are not so pronounced that the Company generally expects to experience significant loss within the short-term. Such credits typically maintain the ability to perform within standard credit terms and credit exposure is not as prominent as credits rated more harshly.

Credit rated substandard are those in which the normal repayment of principal and interest may be, or has been, jeopardized by reason of adverse trends or developments of a financial, managerial, economic or political nature, or important weaknesses exist in collateral. A protracted workout on these credits is a distinct possibility. Prompt corrective action is therefore required to strengthen the Company’s position, and/or to reduce exposure and to assure that adequate remedial measures are taken by the borrower. Credit exposure becomes more likely in such credits and a serious evaluation of the secondary support to the credit is performed.

Credits rated doubtful are those in which full collection of principal appears highly questionable, and which some degree of loss is anticipated, even though the ultimate amount of loss may not yet be certain and/or other factors exist which could affect collection of debt. Based upon available information, positive action by the Company is required to avert or minimize loss.

Loans classified loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather that it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this asset even though partial recovery may be affected in the future.

The following summarizes the Company’s internal ratings of its loans:

(In thousands)
 
Pass
   
Pass-
Watch
   
Special
Mention
   
Substandard
   
Doubtful
   
Total
 
December 31, 2016
                                   
Commercial and industrial
 
$
81,424
   
$
302
   
$
-
   
$
219
   
$
-
   
$
81,945
 
Consumer installment
   
3,749
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
3,749
 
Real estate – residential
   
6,531
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
6,531
 
Real estate – commercial
   
19,921
     
-
     
-
     
121
     
-
     
20,042
 
Real estate – construction and land
   
6,335
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
6,335
 
SBA
   
39,619
     
-
     
-
     
65
     
-
     
39,684
 
USDA
   
3,589
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
3,589
 
Other
   
6
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
6
 
Total
 
$
161,174
   
$
302
   
$
-
   
$
405
   
$
-
   
$
161,881
 
 
                                               
December 31, 2015
                                               
Commercial and industrial
  $ 70,539    
$
-
   
$
345
   
$
678
   
$
-
   
$
71,562
 
Consumer installment
    2,049      
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
2,049
 
Real estate – residential
    6,851      
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
6,851
 
Real estate – commercial
    16,599      
-
     
-
     
137
     
-
     
16,736
 
Real estate – construction and land
    9,607      
-
     
715
     
-
     
-
     
10,322
 
SBA
    28,468      
-
     
-
     
477
     
-
     
28,945
 
USDA
    2,787      
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
2,787
 
Other
    1,542      
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
1,542
 
Total
 
$
138,442
   
$
-
   
$
1,060
   
$
1,292
   
$
-
   
$
140,794
 

The activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the change for the years then ended is presented below. Management has evaluated the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses by estimating the losses in various categories of the loan portfolio. 
 
(In thousands)
 
Commercial and
Industrial
   
Consumer
Installment
   
 
Real Estate
Residential
   
Real Estate
Commercial
   
Real Estate
Construction and Land
   
SBA
   
USDA
   
Other
   
Total
 
December 31, 2016
                                                     
Beginning Balance
 
$
878
   
$
26
   
$
86
   
$
210
   
$
130
   
$
214
   
$
-
    $ 20    
$
1,564
 
Provision (credit) for loan losses   479       8       (7     31       (63     81       -       (20     589  
Charge-offs
   
(391
)
   
(97
)
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(488
)
Recoveries
   
19
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
10
     
1
     
-
     
-
     
30
 
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
   
(372
)
   
(97
)
   
-
     
-
     
10
     
1
     
-
     
-
     
(458
)
Ending balance
 
$
985
   
$
17
   
$
79
   
$
241
   
$
77
   
$
296
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
1,695
 
                                                                         
Period-end amount allocated to:
                                                                       
Loans individually evaluated   for impairment
 
$
20
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
20
 
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
   
965
     
17
     
79
     
241
     
77
     
296
     
-
     
-
     
1,675
 
Ending balance
 
$
985
   
$
17
   
$
79
   
$
241
   
$
77
   
$
296
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
1,695
 
                                                                         
December 31, 2015
                                                                       
Beginning Balance
 
$
918
   
$
20
   
$
25
   
$
265
   
$
69
   
$
344
   
$
41
   
$
13
   
$
1,695
 
Provision (credit) for loan losses
   
(62
)
   
6
     
61
     
(55
)
   
55
     
29
     
(41
)
   
7
     
-
 
Charge-offs
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
(159
)
   
-
     
-
     
(159
)
Recoveries
   
22
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
6
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
28
 
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
   
22
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
6
     
(159
)
   
-
     
-
     
(131
)
Ending balance
 
$
878
   
$
26
   
$
86
   
$
210
   
$
130
   
$
214
   
$
-
   
$
20
   
$
1,564
 
                                                                         
Period-end amount allocated to:
                                                                       
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
26
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
26
 
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
   
852
     
26
     
86
     
210
     
130
     
214
     
-
     
20
     
1,538
 
Ending balance
 
$
878
   
$
26
   
$
86
   
$
210
   
$
130
   
$
214
   
$
-
   
$
20
   
$
1,564
 

The Company’s recorded investment in loans as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 related to each balance in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment and detailed on the basis of the Company’s impairment methodology was as follows:

(In thousands)

 

Commercial and Industrial

   

Consumer Installment

   

Real Estate Residential

   

Real Estate Commercial

   

Real Estate Construction and Land

   

SBA

   

USDA

   

Other

   

Total

 

December 31, 2016

                                                     

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

341

   

$

-

   

$

-

   

$

121

   

$

-

   

$

-

   

$

-

   

$

-

   

$

462

 

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

   

81,604

     

3,749

     

6,531

     

19,921

     

6,335

     

39,684

     

3,589

     

6

     

161,419

 

Ending balance

 

$

81,945

   

$

3,749

   

$

6,531

   

$

20,042

   

$

6,335

   

$

39,684

   

$

3,589

   

$

6

   

$

161,881

 

 

                                                                       

December 31, 2015

                                                                       

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

678

   

$

-

   

$

-

   

$

137

   

$

-

   

$

477

   

$

-

   

$

-

   

$

1,292

 

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

   

70,884

     

2,049

     

6,851

     

16,599

     

10,322

     

28,468

     

2,787

     

1,542

     

139,502

 

Ending balance

 

$

71,562

   

$

2,049

   

$

6,851

   

$

16,736

   

$

10,322

   

$

28,945

   

$

2,787

   

$

1,542

   

$

140,794

 

NOTE 4. BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Year-end premises and equipment were as follows:

(In thousands)
 
December 31,
2016
   
December 31,
2015
 
Land
 
$
676
   
$
676
 
Land improvement
   
18
     
-
 
Building
   
1,279
     
1,279
 
Building improvement
   
2,699
     
2,493
 
Furniture and equipment
   
875
     
1,173
 
Leasehold improvements
   
159
     
159
 
Construction in progress
   
42
     
-
 
 
   
5,748
     
5,780
 
Less: accumulated depreciation
   
1,182
     
1,283
 
Balance at end of period
 
$
4,566
   
$
4,497
 

Depreciation expense, including amortization of leasehold improvements, was $215,000 and $226,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The Company owns a two story, 33,000 square foot commercial office building. The building is approximately 64% leased and the Bank occupies approximately 11,000 square feet of the space, or 33% of the building.

On May 1, 2013, the Company entered into a sub-lease agreement covering its space located at 850 Hwy 114, Southlake, Texas. The term of the sub-lease ran concurrently with the term of the Company’s primary lease, both of which expired on February 28, 2017. The Company did not renew the lease and sublease. The Company’s monthly payment under the primary lease for 2016 was $5,785, which was partially offset by $5,240 the Company received under the sublease.

NOTE 5. OTHER REAL ESTATE AND OTHER ASSETS

Other assets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

(In thousands)

 

December 31,
2016

   

December 31,
2015

 

Loan servicing rights

 

$

1,929

   

$

1,518

 

Accounts receivable – trust fees

   

750

     

1,028

 

Accrued interest receivable

   

795

     

504

 

Prepaid assets

   

360

     

387

 

Other

   

362

     

275

 

Total

 

$

4,196

   

$

3,712

 

The Company had no Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.

SBA and USDA loans sold which the Company retains the servicing for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The risks inherent in loan servicing assets relate primarily to changes in prepayments that result from shifts in loan interest rates. The unpaid principal balances of SBA and USDA loans serviced for others were $98.8 million and $75.8 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, loan servicing assets of $833,000 were added and $422,000 was amortized to non-interest income. During the year ended December 31, 2015, loan servicing assets of $493,000 were added and $125,000 was amortized to non-interest income.

There was no valuation allowance necessary to adjust the aggregate cost basis of the loan servicing asset to fair market value as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.

NOTE 6.  DEPOSITS

Time deposits of $250,000 and over totaled $15.4 million and $22.5 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Deposits at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are summarized as follows:

(In thousands)

 

As of December 31, 2016

   

As of December 31, 2015

 

Non-interest bearing demand

 

$

38,349

     

22

%

 

$

24,138

     

18

%

Interest-bearing demand (NOW)

   

5,849

     

3

     

3,283

     

2

 

Money market accounts

   

47,067

     

27

     

33,474

     

24

 

Savings accounts

   

5,191

     

3

     

5,535

     

4

 

Time deposits $100,000 and over

   

74,311

     

43

     

66,538

     

49

 

Time deposits under $100,000

   

3,908

     

2

     

4,067

     

3

 

Total

 

$

174,675

     

100

%

 

$

137,035

     

100

%

At December 31, 2016, the scheduled maturities of time deposits were as follows:

(In thousands)

     

2017

 

$

56,164

 

2018

   

13,221

 

2019

   

7,578

 

2020

   

452

 

2021

   

804

 

Total

 

$

78,219

 

The aggregate amount of demand deposit overdrafts that have been reclassified as loans at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was insignificant.

NOTE 7. BORROWED FUNDS

The Company has a blanket lien credit line with the FHLB with borrowing capacity of $20.4 million secured by commercial loans and securities with collateral values of $11.1 million and $9.3 million, respectively. The Company had one outstanding overnight advance for $6.0 million at December 31, 2016, with a fixed interest rate of 0.55% and maturity date of January 3, 2017. The advance was paid as of January 3, 2017. The Company had one outstanding overnight advance for $10.0 million at December 31, 2015, with a fixed interest rate of 0.31% and maturity date of January 4, 2016. The advance was renewed at a fixed interest rate of 0.38% and maturity date of January 5, 2016. At maturity the Company determines its borrowing needs and renews the advance accordingly at varying terms ranging from one to seven days.

The Company also has a credit line with the FRB with borrowing capacity of $16.3 million, secured by commercial loans and securities with collateral value of $15.8 million and $540,000, respectively. There were no outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2016 or December 31, 2015.

NOTE 8. OTHER LIABILITIES

Other liabilities as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, were as follows:

(In thousands)

 

December 31,
2016

   

December 31,
2015

 

Trust advisor fees payable

 

$

520

   

$

1,487

 

Accounts payable

   

279

     

-

 

Federal income tax payable

   

69

     

546

 

Incentive compensation

   

101

     

295

 

Data processing

   

76

     

81

 

Audit fees

   

23

     

-

 

Franchise & property taxes

   

5

     

8

 

Interest payable

   

33

     

24

 

Other accruals

   

157

     

243

 

Total

 

$

1,263

   

$

2,684

 

NOTE 9. BENEFIT PLANS

The Company funds certain costs for medical benefits in amounts determined at the discretion of management. The Company has a retirement savings 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees. The Company made matching employee contributions during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. An employee may contribute up to 6% of his or her annual compensation with the Company matching 100% of the employee’s contribution on the first 1% of the employee’s compensation and 50% of the employee’s contribution on the next 5% of the employee’s compensation. Employer contributions charged to expense were $132,000 and $126,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

NOTE 10. INCOME TAXES

The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following:

(In thousands)

 

2016

   

2015

 

Current:

           

Federal

 

$

2,149

   

$

1,544

 

State

   

10

     

(1

)

Total current

   

2,159

     

1,543

 

Deferred federal

   

40

     

260

 

Income tax expense

 

$

2,199

   

$

1,803

 

The effective tax rate differs from the U. S. statutory tax rate due to the following for 2016 and 2015:

 

 

2016

   

2015

 

U.S. statutory rate

   

34.0

%

   

34.0

%

Other

   

1.6

%

   

1.4

%

Effective tax rate

   

35.6

%

   

35.4

%

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as of December 31 are as follows:

(In thousands)

 

2016

   

2015

 

Deferred tax assets:

           

Allowance for loan losses

 

$

576

   

$

532

 

Non-accrual loan interest

   

18

     

27

 

Accrued liabilities

   

34

     

101

 

Net unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale

   

115

     

-

 

Total deferred tax assets

   

743

     

660

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

               

Net deferred loan costs

   

(117

)

   

(86

)

Depreciation and amortization

   

(19

)

   

(42

)

Net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale

   

-

     

(5

)

Total deferred tax liabilities

   

(136

)

   

(133

)

Net deferred tax asset

 

$

607

   

$

527

 

Projections for continued levels of profitability will be reviewed quarterly and any necessary adjustments to the deferred tax assets will be recognized in the provision or benefit for income taxes. In assessing the realization rate of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. No valuation allowance for deferred tax assets was recorded at December 31, 2016 and 2015, as management believes it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax assets will be realized because they were supported by the Company’s earnings for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

NOTE 11. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS

At December 31, 2016, the Company had three stock-based compensation plans (the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan, and the 2014 Non-employee Directors’ Common Stock Plan). The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan expired during the third quarter of 2015, and therefore no additional awards may be issued under this plan.

The stock incentive plans are designed to provide the Company with the flexibility to grant incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options to its executive and other officers. The purpose of the plans are to provide increased incentive for key employees to render services and to exert maximum effort for the success of the Company. The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation plans using the fair value-based method of accounting. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a closed form option valuation (Black-Scholes) model. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for the period within the contractual life of the stock option is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the date of grant. The Company recorded $199,000 and $98,000 in compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, in connection with the stock compensation plans.

2005 Stock Incentive Plan

The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”) is administered by the Board of Directors and had a term of 10 years. The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan expired during the third quarter of 2015 and therefore no additional awards may be issued under this plan.

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, options to purchase a total of 87,000 and 102,000 shares, respectively, under the 2005 Plan were outstanding with an average exercise price of $6.84 and $7.38, respectively. These options vest 20% annually through March 2019. As of December 31, 2016, there was $59,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested equity-based compensation awards expected to vest, with an average vesting period of 2.2 years.

The following is a summary of activity in the 2005 Plan for the year-ended December 31:

 

 

2016

   

2015

 

 

 

Number of
Shares
Underlying
Options

   

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Prices

   
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Life in
Years
   

Number of
Shares
Underlying
Options

   

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Prices

   
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Life in
Years
 

Outstanding at beginning of the year

   

102,000

   

$

7.38

           

233,000

   

$

8.86

       

Granted

   

-

     

-

           

-

     

-

       

Exercised

   

-

     

-

           

-

     

-

       

Expired/forfeited

   

15,000

     

10.52

           

131,000

     

10.00

       

 

                                           

Outstanding at end of period

   

87,000

   

$

6.84

     

3.8

     

102,000

   

$

7.38

     

4.1

 

Exercisable at end of period

   

68,400

   

$

7.34

             

77,200

   

$

8.14

         

Available for grant at end of period

   

-

                     

-

                 

The weighted-average grant date fair value of the options for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $3.50 and $3.33, respectively.

Aggregate intrinsic value of the outstanding stock options and exercisable stock options under the 2005 Plan at December 31, 2016 was $319,000 and $235,000, respectively. Aggregate intrinsic value of the outstanding stock options and exercisable stock options under the 2005 Plan at December 31, 2015, was $163,000 and $115,000, respectively. Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the period, which was $9.60 and $7.00 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding. There were no stock options exercised during 2016 and 2015.

All options carry exercise prices ranging from $1.01 to $13.00. At December 31, 2016, there were 68,400 exercisable options, of which 27,000 shares had no intrinsic value as the exercise price exceeded the stock price.

2015 Stock Incentive Plan

The shareholders of the Company approved the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) at the annual shareholder meeting held on June 24, 2015. The 2015 Plan authorized the granting of options to purchase up to 270,000 shares of common stock of the Company to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company granted 180,000 stock options with an exercise price of $7.15 during the fourth quarter of 2015. A summary of the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the option awards are as follows: 

 

 

December 31,
2015

 

Expected life in years

 

 

10.0

 

Risk-free interest rate

   

1.35

%

Expected volatility

   

19.3

%

Dividend yield

   

0.0

%

Fair value per option

 

$

2.10

 

These options vest 20% annually through October 2020. As of December 31, 2016 there was $285,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested equity-based compensation awards expected to vest, with an average vesting period of 3.8 years.

The following is a summary of activity in the 2015 Plan for the year-ended December:

 

 

2016

   

2015

 

 

 

Number of
Shares
Underlying
Options

   

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Prices

   
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Life in
Years
   

Number of
Shares
Underlying
Options

   

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Prices

   
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Life in
Years
 

Outstanding at beginning of the year

   

180,000

   

$

7.15

           

-

   

$

-

       

Granted

   

-

     

-

           

180,000

     

7.15

       

Exercised

   

-

     

-

           

-

     

-

       

Forfeited

   

2,500

     

7.15

           

-

     

-

       

 

                                           

Outstanding at end of period

   

177,500

   

$

7.15

     

3.8

     

180,000

   

$

7.15

     

9.8

 

Exercisable at end of period

   

35,500

   

$

7.15

             

-

   

$

-

         

Available for grant at end of period

   

92,500

                     

90,000

                 

The weighted-average grant date fair value of the options for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $2.10.

All options carry exercise prices of $7.15. At December 31, 2016, there were 35,500 exercisable options, all of which had intrinsic value. Aggregate intrinsic value of the outstanding stock options and exercisable stock options under the 2015 Plan at December 31, 2016 was $435,000 and $87,000, respectively. There was no intrinsic value of the outstanding stock options and exercisable stock options at December 31, 2015, as the exercise price exceeded the stock price. Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the period, which was $9.60 and $7.00 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding. There were no stock options exercised during 2016 and 2015.

Non-employee Directors’ Common Stock Plan

In December 2014, the Board of Directors approved the 2014 Non-employee Directors’ Common Stock Plan (the “2014 Plan”). The 2014 Plan is intended to promote the best interests of the Company and its shareholders by providing shares of the Company’s common stock to each non-employee director, for his or her service as a director (“service shares”), which shares are intended to promote an increased personal interest in the welfare of the Company by those individuals who are primarily responsible for shaping the long-range plans of the Company.

The 2014 Plan is administered by the Board of Directors. The number of service shares issuable under this plan shall not exceed 100,000. On June 22, 2016, the Company granted 13,750 service shares to the non-employee directors. The grant date fair value was $7.05 per share, resulting in stock compensation expense of approximately $97,000 in 2016.On June 24, 2015, the Company granted 7,975 service shares to the non-employee directors. The grant date fair value was $7.25 per share, resulting in stock compensation expense of approximately $58,000 in 2015.

NOTE 12.  LOAN COMMITMENTS AND OTHER CONTINGENCIES

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the accompanying balance sheets. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

The following table summarizes loan commitments as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:

(In thousands)

 

December 31,
2016

   

December 31,
2015

 

Undisbursed loan commitments

 

$

32,868

   

$

18,740

 

Standby letters of credit

   

10

     

10

 

 

 

$

32,878

   

$

18,750

 

The Company had one non-cancelable office lease agreement that expired on in February 28, 2017. The Company did not occupy this space, and received rental payments under a sublease agreement that expired on the same date as the office lease. The Company did not renew the lease and sublease. The Company also leases various pieces of office equipment under short-term agreements. Lease expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 totaled $72,000 and $66,000, respectively. Future minimum lease payments due under non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 2016 were $12,000.

The Company currently receives rental income from six tenants in the building it is headquartered in, for office space the Company does not occupy. Aggregate future minimum rentals to be received under non-cancelable leases at December 31, 2016 were $841,000 through 2023.

The Company is involved in various regulatory inspections, inquiries, investigations and proceedings, and litigation matters that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business. The process of resolving matters through litigation or other means is inherently uncertain, and it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of these matters, will adversely affect the Company, its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. The Company’s regular practice is to expense legal fees as services are rendered in connection with legal matters, and to accrue for liabilities when payment is probable.

Employment Agreements

The Company has entered into employment agreements with four officers of the Bank, Steve Jones, Craig Barnes, Ken Bramlage and Patrick Howard. The agreements are for an initial one-year term and are automatically renewable for an additional one-year term unless either party elects not to renew.

NOTE 13. RELATED PARTIES

The Company purchased corporate insurance through an insurance agency in which one of its principals is also a director and organizer of the Company. Premiums paid totaled $126,000 and $135,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In management’s opinion, such transactions were made in the ordinary course of business and were made on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons.

The Company purchased employee benefit insurance through an insurance agency in which one of its principals is also a director and organizer of the Company. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 those premiums totaled $573,000 and $456,000 respectively. In management’s opinion, such transactions were made in the ordinary course of business and were made on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons.

At December 31, 2016 and 2015, certain officers, directors and their affiliated companies had depository accounts with the Bank totaling approximately $11.9 million and $6.9 million, respectively. None of those deposit accounts have terms more favorable than those available to any other depositor.

The Company had no loans to officers, directors and their affiliated companies during 2016 and 2015.

NOTE 14. REGULATORY MATTERS

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s and, accordingly, the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under GAAP, regulatory reporting requirements, and regulatory capital standards. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. Furthermore, the Bank’s regulators could require adjustments to regulatory capital not reflected in these financial statements.

Quantitative measures established by regulatory capital standards to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, common equity Tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets, and of tier 1 capital to average assets. To be categorized as “well-capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based capital, tier 1 risk-based capital, common equity tier 1 risk-based capital and tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. As of December 31, 2016, the most recent notification from our primary regulator categorized the bank subsidiary as well-capitalized. 

(In thousands)

 

Actual

   
Minimum Capital
Required Under Basel
III Requirements
   
To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
 

 

 

Amount

   

Ratio

   

Amount

   

Ratio

   

Amount

   

Ratio

 

As of December 31, 2016

                                   

Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

 

$

32,001

     

17.19

%

 

$

16,059

     

8.625

%

 

$

18,620

     

10.00

%

 

                                               

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

   

30,306

     

16.28

     

12,335

     

6.625

     

14,896

     

8.00

 

 

                                               

Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk Weighted Assets)

   

30,306

     

16.28

     

9,542

     

5.125

     

12,103

     

6.50

 

 

                                               

Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)

   

30,306

     

14.36

     

8,440

     

4.00

     

10,550

     

5.00

 

 

                                               

As of December 31, 2015

                                               

Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

 

$

27,813

     

18.33

%

 

$

12,139

     

8.00

%

 

$

15,173

     

10.00

%

 

                                               

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)

   

26,249

     

17.30

     

9,104

     

6.00

     

12,139

     

8.00

 

 

                                               

Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk Weighted Assets)

   

26,249

     

17.30

     

6,828

     

4.50

     

9,863

     

6.50

 

 

                                               

Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)

   

26,249

     

15.02

     

6,994

     

4.00

     

8,742

     

5.00

 

At December 31, 2016, approximately $10.8 million was available for the declaration of dividends by the Bank to the Company without prior approval of regulatory agencies.

NOTE 15. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The fair value of an asset or liability is the price that would be received to sell that asset or paid to transfer that liability in an orderly transaction occurring in the principal market (or most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market) for such asset or liability. In estimating fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. Such valuation techniques are consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques include the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. FASB ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

 

Level 1 Inputs - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

 

 

 

 

Level 2 Inputs - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.

 

 

 

 

Level 3 Inputs - Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or independent asset pricing services and pricing models, the inputs of which are market-based or independently sourced market parameters, including, but not limited to, yield curves, interest rates, volatilities, prepayments, defaults, cumulative loss projections and cash flows. Such securities are classified in Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. The Company has no securities in the Level 1 or Level 3 inputs.

The following table summarizes financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:

(In thousands)

 

Level 1
Inputs

   

Level 2
Inputs

   

Level 3
Inputs

   

Total
Fair Value

 

As of December 31, 2016

                       

Securities available for sale:

                       

U.S. government agencies

 

$

-

   

$

7,961

   

$

-

   

$

7,961

 

Mortgage-backed securities

   

-

     

2,792

     

-

     

2,792

 

 

                               

As of December 31, 2015

                               

Securities available for sale:

                               

U.S. government agencies

 

$

-

   

$

9,162

   

$

-

   

$

9,162

 

Mortgage-backed securities

   

-

     

3,290

     

-

     

3,290

 

Market valuations of our investment securities which are classified as level 2 are provided by an independent third party. The fair values are determined by using several sources for valuing fixed income securities. Their techniques include pricing models that vary based on the type of asset being valued and incorporate available trade, bid and other market information. In accordance with the fair value hierarchy, the market valuation sources include observable market inputs and are therefore considered Level 2 inputs for purposes of determining the fair values.

The Company considers transfers between the levels of the hierarchy to be recognized at the end of related reporting periods. From December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016, no assets for which fair value is measured on a recurring basis transferred between any levels of the hierarchy.

Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). Financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the reported periods include:

At December 31, 2016, impaired loans with a carrying value of $332,000 were reduced by specific valuation allowances totaling $20,000 resulting in a net fair value of $312,000, based on Level 3 inputs. At December 31, 2015, impaired loans with a carrying value of $678,000 were reduced by specific valuation allowances totaling $26,000 resulting in a net fair value of $652,000, based on Level 3 inputs.

The significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) used in the fair value measurement of collateral for collateral-dependent impaired loans primarily relate to the specialized discounting criteria applied to the borrower’s reported amount of collateral. The amount of the collateral discount depends upon the condition and marketability of the collateral, as well as other factors which may affect the collectability of the loan. As the Company’s primary objective in the event of default would be to liquidate the collateral to settle the outstanding balance of the loan, collateral that is less marketable would receive a larger discount. During the reported periods, there were no discounts for collateral-dependent impaired loans.

The significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) used in the fair value measurement of cash flow impaired loans relate to discounted cash flows models using current market rates applied to the estimated life of the loan and credit risk adjustments. Future cash flows are discounted using current interest rates for similar credit risks. During the reported periods, the cash flow discounts ranged from 0.2% to 65% for cash flow impaired loans.

Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the Level 3 fair value measurements in their entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the assets. It is reasonably possible that a change in the estimated fair value for instruments measured using Level 3 inputs could occur in the future.

Loans held for sale include the guaranteed portion of SBA and USDA loans and are reported at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. Fair value for SBA and USDA loans is based on market indications available in the market. There were no impairments reported for the periods presented.

Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the reported periods include other real estate owned (“OREO”) which, upon initial recognition, were re-measured and reported at fair value through a charge-off to the allowance for loan losses and certain foreclosed assets which, subsequent to their initial recognition, were re-measured at fair value through a write-down included in other non-interest expense. Regulatory guidelines require the Company to reevaluate the fair value of OREO on at least an annual basis. The fair value of foreclosed assets, upon initial recognition and impairment, were re-measured using Level 2 inputs based on observable market data. Estimated fair value of OREO is based on appraisals. Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management.

For the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were no re-measurements of OREO.

The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis are described as follows:

Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, restricted securities, accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable. The estimated fair value of demand and savings deposits is the carrying amount since rates are regularly adjusted to market rates and amounts are payable on demand. For borrowed funds and variable rate loans or deposits that re-price frequently and fully, the estimated fair value is the carrying amount. For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent re-pricing, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. For loans held for sale, the estimated fair value is based on market indications for similar assets in the active market. The estimated fair value of other financial instruments and off-balance-sheet loan commitments approximate cost and are not considered significant to this presentation.

In connection with the sale of $35.8 million in loans during 2016, the Company added a servicing asset of $833,000, and amortized $422,000 using the amortization method for the treatment of servicing. Loan servicing assets do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, fair value is estimated using a discounted cash flow model having significant inputs of discount rate, prepayment speed and default rate. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. For the asset recorded in 2016, the discount rate ranged from 7.0% to 8.7% and the combined prepayment and default rates ranged from 8.4% to 9.4%.

In connection with the sale of $21.2 million in loans during 2015, the Company added a servicing asset of $493,000, and amortized $125,000 using the amortization method for the treatment of servicing. Loan servicing assets do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, fair value is estimated using a discounted cash flow model having significant inputs of discount rate, prepayment speed and default rate. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. For the asset recorded in 2015, the discount rate ranged from 7.3% to 9.4% and the combined prepayment and default rates ranged from 8.6% to 10.2%.

Carrying amounts and estimated fair values of other financial instruments by level of valuation input were as follows:

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

(In thousands)

 

Carrying
Amount

   

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Financial assets:

           

Level 1 inputs:

           

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

12,318

   

$

12,318

 

Level 2 inputs:

               

Securities available for sale

   

10,753

     

10,753

 

Securities, restricted

   

1,054

     

1,054

 

Loans held for sale

   

11,225

     

12,295

 

Loans, net

   

158,708

     

159,596

 

Accrued interest receivable

   

795

     

795

 

Level 3 inputs:

               

Securities held to maturity

   

9,668

     

9,668

 

Servicing asset

   

1,929

     

1,929

 

Financial liabilities:

               

Level 1 inputs:

               

Non-interest bearing deposits

   

38,349

     

37,884

 

Level 2 inputs:

               

Interest bearing deposits

   

136,326

     

133,260

 

Borrowed funds

   

6,000

     

6,000

 

Accrued interest payable

   

33

     

33

 
 
 
December 31, 2015
 
(In thousands)
 
Carrying
Amount
   
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Financial assets:
           
Level 1 inputs:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
8,710
   
$
8,710
 
Level 2 inputs:
               
Securities available for sale
   
12,452
     
12,452
 
Securities, restricted
   
1,046
     
1,046
 
Loans held for sale
   
6,365
     
6,925
 
Loans, net
   
137,648
     
138,419
 
Accrued interest receivable
   
504
     
504
 
Receivable for sold loans
   
1,972
     
1,972
 
Level 3 inputs:
               
Servicing asset
   
1,518
     
1,518
 
Financial liabilities:
               
Level 1 inputs:
               
Non-interest bearing deposits
   
24,138
     
24,908
 
Level 2 inputs:
               
Interest bearing deposits
   
112,897
     
112,141
 
Borrowed funds
   
10,000
     
10,000
 
Accrued interest payable
   
24
     
24
 

NOTE 16. PARENT COMPANY CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

T BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

 

December 31,
2016

   

December 31,
2015

 

ASSETS

           

 

           

Cash and due from banks

 

$

737

   

$

770

 

Accounts receivable

   

80

     

61

 

Investment in subsidiary

   

30,424

     

26,379

 

 

               

Total assets

 

$

31,241

   

$

27,210

 

 

               

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL

               

 

               

Accounts payable

  $

68

    $

-

 

Payable to subsidiary

   

16

     

-

 

Total liabilities

    84       -  
                 

Capital

   

31,157

     

27,210

 

 

               

Total liabilities and capital

 

$

31,241

   

$

27,210

 

T BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

(In thousands)

 

2016

   

2015

 

Equity in income from subsidiary

 

$

4,278

   

$

3,426

 

 

               

Non-interest expense:

               

Professional and administrative

   

251

     

103

 

Stock based compensation

   

199

     

98

 

Total non-interest expense

   

450

     

201

 

Income before income taxes

   

3,828

     

3,225

 

Income tax benefit

   

(153

)

   

(68

)

Net Income

 

$

3,981

   

$

3,293

 

T BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)

 

2016

   

2015

 

Net Income

 

$

3,981

   

$

3,293

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

               

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities available-for-sale

   

(353

)

   

32

 

Reclassification adjustment for realized loss on sale included in net income

   

-

     

1

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss), before tax effect

   

(353

)

   

33

 

Tax effect

   

(120

)

   

11

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   

(233

)

   

22

 

Comprehensive income

 

$

3,748

   

$

3,315

 

NOTE 16. PARENT COMPANY CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont’d

T BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

(In thousands)

 

2016

   

2015

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

           

Net income

 

$

3,981

   

$

3,293

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:

               

Equity in income of Bank

   

(4,278

)

   

(3,426

)

Stock based compensation

   

199

     

98

 

Net change in other assets

   

(19

)

   

(30

)

Net change in other liabilities

   

84

     

(28

)

Net cash used in operating activities

   

(33

)

   

(93

)

 

               

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

   

-

     

-

 

 

               

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

   

-

     

-

 

 

               

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

   

(33

)

   

(93

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   

770

     

863

 

 

               

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

737

   

$

770

 

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

As of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (“Disclosure Controls”). Disclosure Controls, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act, are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Based upon their controls evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our Disclosure Controls are effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to management and the Board of Directors regarding the reliability of the Company’s financial reporting and the preparation of published financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, utilizing the framework established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in 1992 and was updated in 2013. Based on this assessment, management believes that as of December 31, 2016, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting are effective.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that accurately and fairly reflect, in reasonable detail, transactions and dispositions of assets; and provide reasonable assurances that: (1) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States; (2) receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Company; and (3) unauthorized acquisitions, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material affect on the Company’s financial statements are prevented or timely detected.

This Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal controls over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.

Information concerning the Company’s directors and executive officers will appear in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A on or before April 30, 2017 (the” Proxy Statement”), under the caption “Election of Directors” and “Executive Officers.” Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

Information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act will appear in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.” Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

We have adopted a Code of Conduct and Conflicts of Interest, which is applicable to all directors, officers and employees of the Company and the Bank. A discussion of our Code of Conduct and Conflicts of Interest will appear in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Code of Conduct.” Such information is incorporated herein by reference and is posted to the Company’s website under “About T Bank – Shareholders”.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Information concerning executive compensation will appear in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Executive Compensation.” Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters.

Information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management will appear in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.” Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Information regarding stock-based compensation awards outstanding and available for future grants as of December 31, 2016, segregated between stock-based compensation plans approved by shareholders and stock-based compensation plans not approved by shareholders, is presented in the table below.

Plan Category

 

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights
(a)

   

Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights
(b)

   

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in (a))

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:

                 

2005 Stock Incentive Plan (1)

   

87,000

   

$

6.84

     

-

 

2015 Stock Incentive Plan

   

177,500

     

7.15

     

92,500

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:

                       

2014 Non-employee Directors’ Common Stock Plan

   

-

     

-

     

78,275

 

(1) The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan has expired and no new awards may be issued.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.

Information concerning certain relationships and related transactions will appear in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Information concerning principal accounting fees and services will appear in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Principal Auditor Fees and Services.” Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

Exhibit No.
 
Description of Exhibit
 
 
 
2.1
 
3.1
 
Articles of Incorporation (1)
3.2
 
Bylaws (2)
10.1
 
T Bancshares, Inc. (f/k/a First Metroplex Capital, Inc.) 2005 Incentive Plan (3)(4)
10.2
 
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (3)(4)
10.3
 
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (3)(4)
10.4
 
T Bancshares, Inc. (f/k/a First Metroplex Capital, Inc.) Organizers’ Warrant Agreement dated November 2, 2004 (5)
10.5
 
Employment Agreement by and between T Bancshares, Inc., T Bank N.A., and Patrick Howard (4)(6)
10.6
 
Employment Agreement by and between T Bancshares, Inc. and Steve Jones (4)(9)
10.7
10.8
10.9
 
Employment Agreement by and between T Bancshares, Inc., T Bank N.A., and Ken Bramlage (4)(6)
Employment Agreement by and between T Bancshares, Inc., T Bank N.A., and Craig Barnes (4)(6)
Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between T Bancshares, Inc., T Bank N.A., and Patrick Howard dated March 31, 2014 (4)(7)
10.10
 
2014 Non-employee Directors’ Common Stock Plan (4)*
10.11
 
2015 Stock Incentive Plan (4)(8)
10.12
 
Form of Stock Option Agreement (4)*
21
 
Subsidiaries of T Bancshares, Inc. *
23
 
31.1
 
31.2
 
32
 
101.INS
  
XBRL Instance Document*
101.SCH
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*
101.CAL
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Calculation Linkbase Document*
101.LAB
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*
101.PRE
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase*
101.DEF
  
XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase*
 
(1)
 
Incorporated by reference from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Registrant with the SEC on August 14, 2007 (File No. 000-51297).
(2)
 
Incorporated by reference from the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Registrant with the SEC on April 30, 2008 (File No. 000-51297).
(3)
 
Incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on September 20, 2005 (Registration No. 333-128456).
(4)
 
Indicates a compensatory plan or contract.
(5)
 
Incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on December 15, 2003 and as amended on June 11, 2007 (Registration No. 333-111153).
(6)
 
Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed by Registrant with the SEC on April 1, 2013 (File No. 000-51297).
(7)
 
Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed by Registrant with the SEC on March 31, 2014 (File No. 000-52197).
(8)
 
Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed by Registrant with the SEC on April 30, 2015 (File No. 000-51297).
(9)
 
Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed by Registrant with the SEC on March 29, 2016 (File No. 000-52197).
*
 
Filed Herewith

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

          None.

SIGNATURES

          Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T BANCSHARES, INC.

 

 

 

 

Dated:

March 29, 2017

By:

/s/ Patrick Howard

 

 

 

Patrick Howard

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

President & Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURE
 
TITLE
 
DATE
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Patrick Howard 
 
Director and Principal Executive
 
March 29, 2017
Patrick Howard
 
 Officer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Ken Bramlage 
 
Principal Financial Officer and
 
March 29, 2017
Ken Bramlage
 
Principal Accounting Officer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Stanley E. Allred
 
Director
 
March 29, 2017
Stanley E. Allred
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Dan Basso 
 
Director
 
March 29, 2017
Dan Basso
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Frankie Basso 
 
Director
 
March 29, 2017
Frankie Basso
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ David Carstens 
 
Director
 
March 29, 2017
David Carstens
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Ron Denheyer 
 
Director
 
March 29, 2017
Ron Denheyer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Eric Langford 
 
Director
 
March 29, 2017
Eric Langford
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Charles M. Mapes, III 
 
Director
 
March 29, 2017
Charles M. Mapes, III
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Thomas McDougal
 
Director
 
March 29, 2017
Thomas McDougal, DDS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Gordon R. Youngblood
 
Director
 
March 29, 2017
Gordon R. Youngblood
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Steven Jones 
 
Director
 
March 29, 2017
Steven Jones
 
 
 
 
81