Attached files

file filename
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - Redwood Mortgage Investors IXck0001448038-ex321_6.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - Redwood Mortgage Investors IXck0001448038-ex311_7.htm
EX-10.7 - EX-10.7 - Redwood Mortgage Investors IXck0001448038-ex107_151.htm

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT

TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from          to          

Commission file number: 000-55601

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

26-3541068

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

 

1825 S. Grant Street, Suite 250, San Mateo, CA

 

94402-2678

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

(650) 365-5341

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.      YES      NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).      YES      NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer

 

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).      YES      NO

 

 

 

 


 

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Balance Sheets

September 30, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, 2015 (audited)

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

4,095,647

 

 

$

1,808,839

 

Loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

34,537,126

 

 

 

27,360,138

 

Advances

 

 

20,756

 

 

 

22,731

 

Accrued interest

 

 

235,056

 

 

 

177,209

 

Loan balances secured by deeds of trust

 

 

34,792,938

 

 

 

27,560,078

 

Loan administrative fees, net

 

 

37,215

 

 

 

86,398

 

Total loans

 

 

34,830,153

 

 

 

27,646,476

 

Total assets

 

$

38,925,800

 

 

$

29,455,315

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES, INVESTORS IN APPLICANT STATUS, AND MEMBERS’ CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities – Accounts payable

 

$

196

 

 

$

2,664

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investors in applicant status

 

 

2,549,997

 

 

 

1,022,865

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Members’ capital, net

 

 

38,806,731

 

 

 

30,171,527

 

Receivable from manager (formation loan)

 

 

(2,431,124

)

 

 

(1,741,741

)

Members’ capital, net, less formation loan

 

 

36,375,607

 

 

 

28,429,786

 

Total liabilities, investors in applicant status and members’ capital

 

$

38,925,800

 

 

$

29,455,315

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

2


 

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Statements of Income

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended September 30,

 

 

For the Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Revenues, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

$

696,544

 

 

$

462,963

 

 

$

1,917,460

 

 

$

1,272,594

 

Late fees

 

 

4,539

 

 

 

1,951

 

 

 

11,352

 

 

 

7,283

 

Total revenues

 

 

701,083

 

 

 

464,914

 

 

 

1,928,812

 

 

 

1,279,877

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for loan losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operations Expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage servicing fees

 

 

20,228

 

 

 

13,501

 

 

 

55,749

 

 

 

38,714

 

Asset management fees, net (Note 3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs from Redwood Mortgage Corp., net (Note 3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,286

 

Professional services, net (Note 3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,500

 

 

 

8,359

 

Other

 

 

1,663

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

5,849

 

 

 

14,177

 

Total operations expense

 

 

21,891

 

 

 

13,611

 

 

 

66,098

 

 

 

97,536

 

Net income

 

$

679,192

 

 

$

451,303

 

 

$

1,862,714

 

 

$

1,182,341

 

Members (99%)

 

 

672,400

 

 

 

446,790

 

 

 

1,844,086

 

 

 

1,170,518

 

Managers (1%)

 

 

6,792

 

 

 

4,513

 

 

 

18,628

 

 

 

11,823

 

 

 

$

679,192

 

 

$

451,303

 

 

$

1,862,714

 

 

$

1,182,341

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

3


 

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Statement of Changes in Members’ Capital

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Members’ Capital, net

 

 

 

Investors In

Applicant

Status

 

 

Members’

Capital

 

 

Manager’s

Capital

 

 

Unallocated

Organization

and Offering

Expenses

 

 

Members’

Capital, net

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

$

1,022,865

 

 

$

31,403,178

 

 

$

47,874

 

 

$

(1,279,525

)

 

$

30,171,527

 

Contributions on application

 

 

10,008,518

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contributions admitted to members' capital

 

 

(8,481,386

)

 

 

8,481,386

 

 

 

8,493

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,489,879

 

Premiums paid on application by RMC

 

 

11,594

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Premiums admitted to members' capital

 

 

(11,594

)

 

 

11,594

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,594

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

1,844,086

 

 

 

18,628

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,862,714

 

Earnings distributed to members

 

 

 

 

 

(1,723,613

)

 

 

(17,571

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,741,184

)

Earnings distributed used in DRIP

 

 

 

 

 

970,934

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

970,934

 

Members’ redemptions

 

 

 

 

 

(600,645

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(600,645

)

Organization and offering expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(381,661

)

 

 

(381,661

)

Manager reimbursement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,311

 

 

 

23,311

 

Early withdrawal penalties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

262

 

 

 

262

 

Balance at September 30, 2016

 

$

2,549,997

 

 

$

40,386,920

 

 

$

57,424

 

 

$

(1,637,613

)

 

$

38,806,731

 

 

 

 

Statement of Changes in Members’ Capital

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Members’ Capital, net

 

 

 

Investors In

Applicant

Status

 

 

Members’

Capital

 

 

Manager’s

Capital

 

 

Unallocated

Organization

and Offering

Expenses

 

 

Members’

Capital, net

 

Balances at June 30, 2016

 

$

1,509,600

 

 

$

37,318,444

 

 

$

47,749

 

 

$

(1,516,259

)

 

$

35,849,934

 

Contributions on application

 

 

3,923,003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contributions admitted to members' capital

 

 

(2,882,606

)

 

 

2,882,606

 

 

 

2,883

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,885,489

 

Premiums paid on application by RMC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Premiums admitted to members' capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

672,400

 

 

 

6,792

 

 

 

 

 

 

679,192

 

Earnings distributed to members

 

 

 

 

 

(624,011

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(624,011

)

Earnings distributed used in DRIP

 

 

 

 

 

346,001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

346,001

 

Members’ redemptions

 

 

 

 

 

(208,520

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(208,520

)

Organization and offering expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(129,717

)

 

 

(129,717

)

Manager reimbursement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,101

 

 

 

8,101

 

Early withdrawal penalties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

262

 

 

 

262

 

Balance at September 30, 2016

 

$

2,549,997

 

 

$

40,386,920

 

 

$

57,424

 

 

$

(1,637,613

)

 

$

38,806,731

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

4


 

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Statements of Cash Flows

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended September 30,

 

 

For the Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest received

 

$

690,103

 

 

$

455,652

 

 

$

1,887,752

 

 

$

1,318,040

 

Other loan income

 

 

4,589

 

 

 

1,951

 

 

 

11,502

 

 

 

7,283

 

Loan administrative fee reimbursed (paid)

 

 

-

 

 

 

14,162

 

 

 

21,044

 

 

 

(76,012

)

Operations expense

 

 

(17,775

)

 

 

(13,179

)

 

 

(68,148

)

 

 

(19,296

)

Total cash provided by (used in) operations

 

 

676,917

 

 

 

458,586

 

 

 

1,852,150

 

 

 

1,230,015

 

Investing – loan principal/advances

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal collected on loans

 

 

4,105,589

 

 

 

4,736,100

 

 

 

14,611,262

 

 

 

10,780,949

 

Loans originated

 

 

(7,620,750

)

 

 

(5,256,730

)

 

 

(21,788,250

)

 

 

(14,274,123

)

Advances on loans

 

 

311

 

 

 

(13,376

)

 

 

1,976

 

 

 

(13,611

)

Total cash provided by (used in) investing

 

 

(3,514,850

)

 

 

(534,006

)

 

 

(7,175,012

)

 

 

(3,506,785

)

Financing – members’ capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Contributions by members, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Contributions by members

 

 

3,925,921

 

 

 

1,969,425

 

 

 

10,028,663

 

 

 

6,063,454

 

    Organization and offering expenses paid, net

 

 

(121,616

)

 

 

(98,744

)

 

 

(358,351

)

 

 

(276,062

)

    Formation loan funding

 

 

(273,910

)

 

 

(138,980

)

 

 

(689,746

)

 

 

(424,999

)

    Formation loan collected

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

8,366

 

Total cash provided by members, net

 

 

3,530,395

 

 

 

1,731,701

 

 

 

8,980,566

 

 

 

5,370,759

 

     Distributions to members

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Earnings distributed

 

 

(278,011

)

 

 

(189,032

)

 

 

(770,251

)

 

 

(546,333

)

    Redemptions

 

 

(208,520

)

 

 

(286,771

)

 

 

(600,645

)

 

 

(788,611

)

Cash distributions to members

 

 

(486,531

)

 

 

(475,803

)

 

 

(1,370,896

)

 

 

(1,334,944

)

     Total cash provided by (used in) financing

 

 

3,043,864

 

 

 

1,255,898

 

 

 

7,609,670

 

 

 

4,035,815

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash

 

 

205,931

 

 

 

1,180,478

 

 

 

2,286,808

 

 

 

1,759,045

 

Cash, beginning of period

 

 

3,889,716

 

 

 

1,842,881

 

 

 

1,808,839

 

 

 

1,264,314

 

Cash, end of period

 

$

4,095,647

 

 

$

3,023,359

 

 

$

4,095,647

 

 

$

3,023,359

 

 

Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended September 30,

 

 

For the Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Net income

 

$

679,192

 

 

$

451,303

 

 

$

1,862,714

 

 

$

1,182,341

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by

   (used in) operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of loan administrative fees

 

 

9,799

 

 

 

37,913

 

 

 

28,139

 

 

 

112,130

 

Change in operating assets and liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued interest

 

 

(16,239

)

 

 

(13,042

)

 

 

(57,847

)

 

 

(34,502

)

Receivable from affiliate

 

 

3,541

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77,347

 

Loan administrative fees reimbursed (paid)

 

 

 

 

 

(18,020

)

 

 

21,044

 

 

 

(108,194

)

Accounts payable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

624

 

 

 

432

 

 

 

(1,900

)

 

 

893

 

Total adjustments

 

 

(2,275

)

 

 

7,283

 

 

 

(10,564

)

 

 

47,674

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

$

676,917

 

 

$

458,586

 

 

$

1,852,150

 

 

$

1,230,015

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

 

5


 

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL

In the opinion of the manager, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal, recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial information included therein. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in the company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (or SEC). The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the operations results to be expected for the full year.

Redwood Mortgage Investors IX, LLC (RMI IX or the company) is a Delaware limited liability company formed in October 2008 to engage in business as a mortgage lender and investor by making and holding-for-investment mortgage loans secured by California real estate, primarily through first and second deeds of trust.

The company is externally managed. Redwood Mortgage Corp. (or RMC) is the manager of the company. The manager is solely responsible for managing the business and affairs of the company, subject to the voting rights of the members on specified matters. The manager acting alone has the power and authority to act for and bind the company. The manager is required to contribute to capital one tenth of one percent (0.1%) of the aggregate capital accounts of the members. The mortgage loans the company funds and/or invests in are arranged and generally are serviced by RMC.

The rights, duties and powers of the members and manager of the company are governed by the company’s operating agreement, the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act and the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act.  Members should refer to the company’s operating agreement for complete disclosure of its provisions.

Profits and losses are allocated among the members according to their respective capital accounts monthly after one percent (1%) of the profits and losses are allocated to the manager. The monthly results are subject to subsequent adjustment as a result of quarterly and year-end accounting and reporting. Federal and state income taxes are the obligation of the members, if and when taxes apply, other than the annual California franchise tax and any California LLC cash receipts taxes paid by the company.

The ongoing sources of funds for loans are the proceeds from (1) sale of members’ units, including units sold by reinvestment of distributions (DRIP), (2) loan payoffs, (3) borrowers’ monthly principal and interest payments, and, (4) to a lesser degree and, if obtained, a line of credit.  Cash generated from loan payoffs and borrower payments of principal and interest is used for operating expenses, income distributions to members, reimbursements to RMC of origination and offering expenses and unit redemptions.  The cash flow, if any, in excess of these uses is re-invested in new loans.

Ongoing public offering of units/ SEC registrations

In June 2016, the company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed with SEC (SEC File No. 333-208315) to offer up to 120,000,000 units ($120,000,000) to the public and 20,000,000 units ($20,000,000) to its members pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (DRIP) became effective and is effective for up to three (3) years thereafter.

The units have been registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (or the Exchange Act). Such registration of the units, along with the satisfaction of certain other requirements under ERISA, enables the units to qualify as “publicly-offered securities” for purposes of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (or ERISA) and regulations issued thereunder. By satisfying those requirements, the underlying assets of the company should not be considered assets of a “benefit plan investor” (as defined under ERISA) by virtue of the investment by such benefit plan investor in the units.

Distribution policy

Cash available for distribution at the end of each calendar month is allocated ninety-nine percent (99%) to the members and one percent (1%) to the manager. Cash available for distribution means cash funds provided from operations (excluding repayments for loan principal and other capital transaction proceeds), net of cash funds used to pay certain operating expenses and debt repayments, less amounts set aside for creation or restoration of reserves. The manager may withhold from cash available for distribution otherwise distributable to the members with respect to any period the respective amounts of organization and offering expenses allocated to the members for the applicable period pursuant to the company’s reimbursement and allocation of organization and offering expenses policy.

6


REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

Per the terms of the company’s operating agreement, cash available for distribution allocated to the members is allocated among the members in proportion to their percentage interests (except with respect to differences in the amounts of organization and offering expenses allocated to the respective members during the applicable period) and in proportion to the number of days during the applicable month that they owned such percentage interests.

Distributions allocable to members, other than those participating in the DRIP, are distributed to them in cash at the end of each calendar month. The manager’s allocable share of cash available for distribution is also distributed not more frequently than with cash distributions to members. Cash available for distribution allocable to members who participate in the DRIP is credited to their respective capital accounts at the end of each calendar month.

Distribution reinvestment plan

The DRIP provision of the operating agreement permits members to elect to have all or a portion of their monthly distributions reinvested in additional units. Members may withdraw from the DRIP with written notice.

Liquidity and unit redemption program

No public trading market exists for the units and none is likely to develop. Thus, there is no certainty the units can be sold at a price equal to the stated value of the capital account. In order to provide liquidity, the company adopted a unit redemption program that provides for a member to redeem all or part of its units, subject to certain limitations.

After a one-year period, a member may redeem all or part of its units, subject to certain limitations. The price paid for redeemed units is based on the lesser of the purchase price paid by the redeeming member or the member’s capital account balance as of the date of each redemption payment.  Redemption value is calculated as follows:

 

After one year:        92% of purchase price or the capital account balance, whichever is less;

 

After two years:      94% of purchase price or the capital account balance, whichever is less;

 

After three years:    96% of purchase price or the capital account balance, whichever is less;

 

After four years:     98% of purchase price or the capital account balance, whichever is less;

 

After five years:     100% of purchase price or the capital account balance, whichever is less.

The company redeems units at the end of each quarter, subject to certain limitations as provided for in the operating agreement.

The number of units that may be redeemed per quarter per individual member is subject to a maximum of the greater of 100,000 units or 25% of the member’s units outstanding. For redemption requests requiring more than one quarter to fully redeem, the percentage discount amount that, if any, applies when the redemption payments begin continues to apply throughout the redemption period and applies to all units covered by such redemption request regardless of when the final redemption payment is made.

The company will not, in any calendar year, redeem more than five percent (5%) of the weighted average number of units outstanding during the twelve-month period immediately prior to the date of the redemption. The company has not established a cash reserve from which to fund redemptions. The company’s capacity to redeem units upon request is limited by the availability of cash and the company’s cash flow.  

Lending and investment guidelines, objectives and criteria

The company’s loans generally have shorter maturity terms than typical mortgages.  In the event a borrower is unable to repay in full the principal owing on the loan at maturity, the company may consider extending the term through a loan modification or may foreclose and take back the property for sale.

7


REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

Generally, interest rates on the company’s mortgage loans are not affected by market movements in interest rates. If, as expected, we continue to make primarily fixed rate loans and interest rates were to rise, a possible result would be lower prepayments of the company’s loans. This increase in the duration of the time loans are on the books may reduce overall liquidity, which itself may reduce the company’s ability to invest into loans at higher interest rates. Conversely, if interest rates were to decline, we could see a significant increase in borrower prepayments. If we then invest in new loans at lower rates of interest, a lower yield to members may possibly result.

RMI IX’s primary investment objectives are to:

 

Yield a favorable rate of return from the company’s business of making and/or investing in mortgage loans,

 

Preserve and protect the company’s capital by making and/or investing in loans secured by California real estate, preferably income-producing properties geographically situated in the San Francisco Bay Area and the coastal metropolitan regions of Southern California, and,

 

Generate and distribute net cash flow from these mortgage lending and investing activities.

The company generally funds loans:

 

Having monthly payments of interest only or of principal and interest at fixed rates, calculated on a 30-year amortization basis with a balloon payment at maturity, and,

 

Having maturities of 5 years or less, not to exceed 15 years.

The cash flow and the income generated by the real property securing the loan factor into the credit decisions, as does the general creditworthiness, experience and reputation of the borrower. However, for loans secured by real property, other than owner-occupied personal residences, such considerations are subordinate to a determination that the value of the real property is sufficient, in and of itself, as a source of repayment. The amount of the company’s loan combined with the outstanding debt and claims secured by a senior deed of trust on the real property, if any, generally is not to exceed a percentage of the appraised value of the property (the “loan to value ratio”, or LTV) specified in the lending guidelines.

Unit sales commissions paid to broker-dealers/formation loan

Commissions for units sales to be paid to broker-dealers (B/D sales commissions) are paid by RMC and are not paid directly by the company out of offering proceeds. Instead, the company advances to RMC, from offering proceeds, amounts not exceeding seven percent (7%) of offering proceeds in the aggregate to pay the B/D sales commissions and premiums to be paid to investors in connection with unsolicited orders. The receivable arising from the advances is unsecured and non-interest bearing and is referred to as the “formation loan.”

Reimbursement and allocation of organization and offering expenses

The manager is reimbursed for, or the company may pay directly, organization and offering expenses (or O&O expenses) incurred in connection with the organization of the company or offering of the units including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees, accounting fees, printing costs and other selling expenses (other than sales commissions) in a total amount not exceeding 4.5% of the original purchase price of all units (other than DRIP units) sold in all offerings (hereafter, the “maximum O&O expenses”), and the manager pays any O&O expenses in excess of the maximum O&O expenses. For each calendar quarter or portion thereof after December 31, 2015 that a member holds units (other than DRIP units) and for a maximum of forty such quarters, a portion of the O&O expenses borne by the company is allocated to and debited from that member’s capital account in an annual amount equal to 0.45% of the member’s original purchase price for those units, in equal quarterly installments of 0.1125% each commencing with the later of the first calendar quarter of 2016 or the first full calendar quarter after a member’s purchase of units, and continuing through the quarter in which such units are redeemed. If at any time the aggregate O&O expenses actually paid or reimbursed by the company since inception are less than the maximum O&O expenses, the company shall first reimburse the manager for any O&O expenses previously borne by it so long as it does not result in the company bearing more than the maximum O&O expenses, and any savings thereafter remaining shall be equitably allocated among (and serve to reduce any subsequent cost allocations to) those members who have not yet received forty quarterly allocations of O&O expenses, as determined in the good faith judgment of the managers. Any O&O expenses with respect to a member’s units that remain unallocated upon redemption of such units shall be reimbursed to the company by the manager.

8


REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

Term of the company

The term of the company will continue until October 8, 2028, unless sooner terminated as provided in the operating agreement.

 

 

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation

The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

Management estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions about the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities, at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Such estimates relate principally to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, including, when applicable, the valuation of impaired loans (which itself requires determining the fair value of the collateral), and the valuation of real estate held for sale and held as investment, at acquisition and subsequently. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.

-Fair value estimates

GAAP defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction.  Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact; and (iv) willing to transact.

Fair values of assets and liabilities are determined based on the fair-value hierarchy established in GAAP. The hierarchy is comprised of three levels of inputs to be used:

 

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market is a market in which transactions occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

 

Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly in active markets and quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities that are not active, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable or inputs derived from or corroborated by market data.

 

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs reflect the company’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (including assumptions about risk). Unobservable inputs are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances and may include the company’s own data.

The fair value of the collateral is determined by exercise of judgment based on management’s experience informed by appraisals (by licensed appraisers), brokers’ opinion of values and publicly available information on in-market transactions. Appraisals of commercial real property generally present three approaches to estimating value: 1) market comparables or sales approach; 2) cost to replace; and 3) capitalized cash flows or investment approach. These approaches may or may not result in a common, single value. The market-comparables approach may yield several different values depending on certain basic assumptions, such as, determining highest and best use (which may or may not be the current use); determining the condition (e.g., as-is, when-completed or for land when-entitled); and determining the unit of value (e.g., as a series of individual unit sales or as a bulk disposition).

9


REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

Management has the requisite familiarity with the real estate markets it lends in generally and of the properties lent on specifically to analyze sales-comparables and assess their suitability/applicability. Management is acquainted with market participants – investors, developers, brokers, lenders – that are useful, relevant secondary sources of data and information regarding valuation and valuation variability. These secondary sources may have familiarity with and perspectives on pending transactions, successful strategies to optimize value and the history and details of specific properties – on and off the market – that enhance the process and analysis that is particularly and principally germane to establishing value in distressed markets and/or property types.

Collateral fair values are reviewed quarterly and the protective equity for each loan is computed. As used herein, “protective equity” is the arithmetic difference between the fair value of the collateral, net of any senior liens, and the loan balance, where “loan balance” is the sum of the unpaid principal, advances and the recorded interest thereon. This computation is done for each loan (whether impaired or performing), and while loans secured by collateral of similar property type are grouped, there is enough distinction and variation in the collateral that a loan-by-loan, collateral-by-collateral analysis is appropriate.

Cash and cash equivalents

The company considers all highly liquid financial instruments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Periodically, the company’s cash balances in banks exceed federally insured limits.

Loans and interest income

Loans generally are stated at the unpaid principal balance (principal). Management has discretion to pay amounts (advances) to third parties on behalf of borrowers to protect the company’s interest in the loan. Advances include, but are not limited to, the payment of interest and principal on a senior lien to prevent foreclosure by the senior lien holder, property taxes, insurance premiums and attorney fees. Advances generally are stated at the amounts paid out on the borrower’s behalf and any accrued interest on amounts paid out, until repaid by the borrower.

The company may fund a specific loan origination net of an interest reserve to insure timely interest payments at the inception (one to two years) of the loan. As monthly interest payments become due, the company funds the payments into the affiliated trust account. In the event of an early loan payoff, any unapplied interest reserves would be first applied to any accrued but unpaid interest and then as a reduction to the principal.

If events and/or changes in circumstances cause management to have serious doubts about the collectability of the payments of interest and principal in accordance with the loan agreement, a loan may be designated as impaired.  Impaired loans are included in management’s periodic analysis of recoverability. Any subsequent payments on impaired loans are applied to late fees, then to the accrued interest, then to advances, and lastly to principal.

From time to time, the company negotiates and enters into loan modifications with borrowers whose loans are delinquent. In the normal course of the company’s operations, loans that mature may be renewed at then current market rates and terms for new loans. Such renewals are not designated as impaired, unless the renewed loan was previously designated as impaired.

Interest is accrued daily based on the principal of the loans.  An impaired loan continues to accrue as long as the loan is in the process of collection and is considered to be well-secured. Loans are placed on non-accrual status at the earlier of management’s determination that the primary source of repayment will come from the foreclosure and subsequent sale of the collateral securing the loan (which usually occurs when a notice of sale is filed) or when the loan is no longer considered well-secured. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, the accrual of interest is discontinued; however, previously recorded interest is not reversed. A loan may return to accrual status when all delinquent interest and principal payments become current in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement.

Loan administration fees paid to RMC for loans funded by the company are capitalized and amortized over the life of the loan on a straight-line method which approximates the effective interest method.

10


REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

Allowance for loan losses

Loans and the related accrued interest and advances are analyzed on a periodic basis for ultimate recoverability. Delinquencies are identified and followed as part of the loan system. Delinquencies are determined based upon contractual terms. For impaired loans, a provision is made for loan losses to adjust the allowance for loan losses to an amount considered by management to be adequate, with due consideration to collateral values, such that the net carrying amount (unpaid principal balance, plus advances, plus accrued interest less the specific allowance) is reduced to the present value of future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or, if a loan is collateral dependent, to the estimated fair value of the related collateral, net of any senior loans, and net of any costs to sell in arriving at net realizable value if planned disposition of the asset securing a loan is by way of sale.

The fair value estimates of the related collateral are derived from information available in the real estate markets including similar property and may require the experience and judgment of third parties such as commercial real estate appraisers and brokers.

Loans determined not to be individually impaired are grouped by the property type of the underlying collateral, and for each loan and for the total by property type, the amount of protective equity or amount of exposure to loss is computed.

Based on its knowledge of the borrowers and their historical (and expected) performance, and the exposure to loss as indicated in the analysis, management estimates an appropriate reserve by property type for probable credit losses in the portfolio. Because the company is an asset-based lender, except as to owner-occupied residences, and because specific regions, neighborhoods and even properties within the same neighborhoods vary significantly as to real estate values and transaction activity, general market trends, which may be indicative of a change in the risk of a loss, and a borrower’s creditworthiness are secondary to the condition of the property, the property type and the neighborhood/region in which the property is located, and do not enter substantially into the determination of the amount of the non-specific (i.e., general) reserves.

The company charges off uncollectible loans and related receivables directly to the allowance account once it is determined the full amount is not collectible.

Real estate owned (REO)

Real estate owned (REO) is property acquired in full or partial settlement of loan obligations generally through foreclosure, and is recorded at acquisition at the lower of the amount owed on the loan (legal basis), plus any senior indebtedness, or at the property’s net realizable value, which is the fair value less estimated costs to sell, as applicable. The fair value estimates are derived from information available in the real estate markets, including similar property, and often require the experience and judgment of third parties such as commercial real estate appraisers and brokers. The estimates figure materially in calculating the value of the property at acquisition, the level of charge to the allowance for loan losses and any subsequent valuation reserves. After acquisition, costs incurred relating to the development and improvement of property are capitalized to the extent they do not cause the recorded value to exceed the net realizable value, whereas costs relating to holding and disposition of the property are expensed as incurred.  After acquisition, REO is analyzed periodically for changes in fair values and any subsequent write down is charged to operations expenses. Any recovery in the fair value subsequent to such a write down is recorded and is not to exceed the value recorded at acquisition. Recognition of gains on the sale of real estate is dependent upon the transaction meeting certain criteria related to the nature of the property and the terms of the sale, including potential seller financing.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

On June 16, 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-13 (ASU 2016-13) Financial Instruments – Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (Topic 326), which introduces new guidance for the accounting for credit losses on instruments within its scope.

11


REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

ASU 2016-13 introduces an approach based on expected losses to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments, including loans. It also modifies the impairment model for available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities and provides for a simplified accounting model for purchased financial assets with credit deterioration since their origination.  ASU 2016-13’s approach, referred to as the current expected credit losses (CECL) model, applies to: (1) financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost, and (2) certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This includes loans, held-to-maturity debt securities, loan commitments, financial guarantees, and net investments in leases, as well as reinsurance and trade receivables. Upon initial recognition of the exposure, the CECL model requires an entity to estimate the credit losses expected over the life of an exposure (or pool of exposures). The estimate of expected credit losses (ECL) should consider historical information, current information, and reasonable and supportable forecasts, including estimates of prepayments.  ASU 2016-13 does not prescribe a specific method to make the estimate so its application will require significant judgment.

Generally, the initial estimate of the ECL and subsequent changes in the estimate will be reported in current earnings. The ECL will be recorded through an allowance for loan losses (ALL) in the statement of financial position.

ASU 2016-13 will be effective for SEC filers in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted as of fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 including interim periods within those fiscal years.

RMC is evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-13 on the credit analytics and other processes used in establishing the allowance for loan losses. The initial conclusion is that, because RMI IX is a real estate based lender, relying primarily on low LTV’s/significant protective equity in making the lending decision, the impact on reported financial position and results of operations will not be material to the financial position or results from operations of the company.

 

 

NOTE 3 – MANAGER AND OTHER RELATED PARTIES

RMC’s allocated one percent (1%) of the profits and losses was $6,792 and $4,513 for the three months ended and $18,628 and $11,823 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

RMC, at its sole discretion, provided financial support in the form of fee waivers and absorbed expenses, that improved RMI IX’s net income and the return to investors in both 2016 and 2015.  Total support provided, as detailed below, was approximately $264,000 and $140,000 for the three months ended, and approximately $907,000 and $324,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The fee waivers and absorbed expenses by RMC were not made for the purpose of providing the company with sufficient funds to satisfy withdrawal requests, nor to meet any required level of distributions, as the company has no such required level of distributions. Any decision by RMC to waive fees and/or to absorb expenses, and the amount (if any) to be waived or absorbed, is made by RMC in its sole discretion. In determining the level of fees to be waived and/or expenses to be absorbed, RMC generally has been guided by the primary investment objectives of RMI IX to yield a favorable rate of return and to generate and distribute cash flow from investment activities (for 2016 and 2015 an annualized distribution rate of 6.5% of members’ capital account balances).  Beginning in 2016, members’ capital accounts (except contributions via DRIP units) are assessed 0.45% annually for 10 years for allocations of O&O expenses, and RMC has maintained net income support sufficient so that the O&O expense allocation is made without causing a reduction in members’ capital account balances. No assurance can be given that RMC will continue to provide net income support in the future.

12


REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

Formation loan

Formation loan transactions are presented in the following table at September 30, 2016.

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

Since

Inception

 

Balance, January 1, 2016

 

$

1,741,741

 

 

$

 

Formation loan advances to RMC

 

 

689,746

 

 

 

2,888,228

 

Payments received from RMC

 

 

 

 

 

(445,123

)

Early withdrawal penalties applied

 

 

(363

)

 

 

(11,981

)

Balance, September 30, 2016

 

$

2,431,124

 

 

$

2,431,124

 

Subscription proceeds since inception

 

 

 

 

 

$

41,175,396

 

Formation loan advance rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

%

 

The future minimum payments on the formation loan are presented in the following table as of September 30, 2016.

 

2016

 

$

174,174

 

2017

 

 

174,174

 

2018

 

 

174,174

 

2019

 

 

174,174

 

2020

 

 

174,174

 

Thereafter

 

 

1,560,254

 

Total

 

$

2,431,124

 

 

The annual payments on the formation loan are one-tenth of the principal balance outstanding at December 31 of the prior year. Upon completion of the offering, the remaining principal balance outstanding will be paid over 10 years or, if less, over a period until the expiration of the term of our operating agreement, in equal annual installments. The repayment of the formation loan will be reduced partially by a portion of early redemption penalties paid to us and will be forgiven if the manager is removed and RMC is no longer receiving payments for services rendered.

The following commissions and fees are paid by borrowers directly to RMC.

-Brokerage commissions, loan originations

For fees in connection with the review, selection, evaluation, negotiation and extension of loans, RMC may collect a loan brokerage commission that is expected to range from approximately 2% to 5% of the principal amount of each loan made during the year. Total loan brokerage commissions in any year are limited to an amount not to exceed 4% of the total company assets at the beginning of the year. The loan brokerage commissions are paid by borrowers, and thus, are not an expense of the company. These fees totaled $139,061 and $126,202 for the three months ended, and $389,528 and $225,730 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

-Other fees

RMC receives fees for processing, notary, document preparation, credit investigation, reconveyance and other mortgage related fees.  The amounts received are customary for comparable services in the geographical area where the property securing the loan is located, payable solely by the borrower and not by the company.  These fees totaled $13,976 and $13,567 for the three months ended and $55,200 and $30,161 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

13


REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

The following fees are paid by the company to RMC.

-Loan administrative fees

RMC is entitled to receive a loan administrative fee in an amount up to 1% of the principal amount of each new loan originated or acquired on the company’s behalf by RMC for services rendered in connection with the selection and underwriting of potential loans.  Such fees are payable by the company upon the closing or acquisition of each loan. The loan administrative fees paid by the company to RMC were $0 and $18,020 for the three months ended, and $0 and $108,194 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In August 2015 RMC, at its sole discretion, began waiving loan administrative fees. Loan administrative fees waived were approximately $82,708 for the three months ended, and $217,883 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, loan administrative fees waived totaled $34,547  There is no assurance RMC will waive these fees in the future.

-Mortgage servicing fees

RMC earns mortgage servicing fees from the company of up to one-quarter of one percent (0.25%) annually of the unpaid principal balance of the loan portfolio or such lesser amount as is reasonable and customary in the geographic area where the property securing the mortgage is located. RMC is entitled to receive these fees regardless of whether specific mortgage payments are collected. The mortgage servicing fees are accrued monthly on all loans. Remittance to RMC is made monthly unless the loan has been assigned a specific loss reserve, at which point remittance is deferred until the specific loss reserve is no longer required, or the property has been acquired by the company. To enhance the earnings of the company, RMC, in its sole discretion, may elect to accept less than the maximum amount of the mortgage servicing fee. An increase or decrease in this fee within the limits set by the operating agreement directly impacts the yield to the members. Mortgage servicing fees incurred and paid were $20,228 and $13,501  for the three months ended, and $55,749 and $38,714 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. RMC did not waive any mortgage servicing fees during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.

-Asset management fees

RMC is entitled to receive a monthly asset management fee for managing the company’s portfolio and operations in an amount up to three-quarters of one percent (0.75%) annually of the portion of the capital originally committed to investment in mortgages, not including leverage, and including up to two percent (2%) of working capital reserves. This amount is recomputed annually by subtracting from the then fair value of the company’s loans plus working capital reserves, an amount equal to the outstanding debt.

RMC, at its sole discretion, may elect to accept less than the maximum amount of the asset management fee.  An increase or decrease in this fee within the limits set by the operating agreement directly impacts the yield to the members. There is no assurance RMC will decrease or waive these fees in the future. The maximum asset management fees chargeable by RMC were $71,672 and $51,257 for the three months ended, and $197,307 and $143,595 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, no fees were collected.

-Costs through RMC

RMC, per the operating agreement, may request reimbursement by the company for operations expense incurred on behalf of the company, including without limitation, accounting and audit fees, legal fees and expenses, postage and preparation of reports to members and out-of-pocket general and administration expenses. Certain costs (e.g. postage) can be allocated specifically to the company.  Other costs are allocated on a pro-rata basis (e.g. by the company’s percentage of total capital of all mortgage funds managed by RMC).  Payroll and consulting fees are broken out first based on activity, and then allocated to the company on a pro-rata basis based on percentage of capital to the total capital of all mortgage funds.  The decision to request reimbursement of any qualifying charges is made by RMC at its sole discretion. Costs incurred by RMC, for which reimbursement could have been requested, were $67,676 and $40,473 for the three months ended, and $189,425 and $111,127 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 no fees were collected. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, fees totaling $0 and $36,286, respectively, were collected.

-Professional Services

RMC, at its sole discretion, may elect to reimburse the company for professional services (primarily audit and tax expense). An increase or decrease in reimbursements by RMC directly impacts the yield to the members. RMC reimbursed the company for professional services of $42,298 and $13,644 for the three months ended, and $301,972 and $71,186 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

14


REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

Reimbursement and allocation of organization and offering expenses

Organization and offering expenses (O & O expenses) are summarized in the following table for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Balance, January 1

 

$

1,279,525

 

 

$

953,271

 

O&O expenses reimbursed to RMC

 

 

381,541

 

 

 

275,941

 

Early withdrawal penalties applied (1)

 

 

(262

)

 

 

(3,477

)

O&O expenses allocated

 

 

 

 

 

 

O&O expenses paid by the company

 

 

120

 

 

 

120

 

O&O expenses reimbursed by RMC (2)

 

 

(23,311

)

 

 

 

Balance, September 30,

 

$

1,637,613

 

 

$

1,225,855

 

Gross proceeds admitted

 

$

38,625,400

 

 

$

27,241,215

 

Percent reimbursed to RMC

 

 

4.5

%

 

 

4.5

%

O & O expenses incurred by RMC, RMI IX

   inception to date

 

$

5,167,339

 

 

$

3,264,882

 

O & O expenses incurred by RMC and remaining

   to be reimbursed to RMC

 

$

3,429,578

 

 

$

2,039,027

 

 

(1)

Early withdrawal penalties collected are applied to the next installment of principal due under the formation loan and to reduce the amount owed RMC for O&O expenses.  The amounts credited will be determined by the ratio between the amount of the formation loan and the amount of offering costs incurred by the company.

(2)

RMC reimburses the company for any unallocated O&O expenses on units redeemed.

 

 

NOTE 4 – LOANS

Loans generally are funded at a fixed interest rate with a loan term of up to five years.  Loans acquired are generally done so within the first six months of origination, and purchased at the current par value, which approximates fair value. As of September 30, 2016, 83 of the company’s 88 loans (representing 98% of the aggregate principal of the company’s loan portfolio) have a loan term of five years or less from loan inception. The remaining loans have terms longer than five years. Substantially all loans are written without a prepayment penalty provision. As of September 30, 2016, 20 loans outstanding (representing 29% of the aggregate principal balance of the company’s loan portfolio) provide for monthly payments of interest only, with the principal due in full at maturity. The remaining loans require monthly payments of principal and interest, typically calculated on a 30-year amortization, with the remaining principal balance due at maturity.

Secured loans unpaid principal balance (principal)

Secured loan transactions are summarized in the following table for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Principal, January 1

 

$

27,360,138

 

 

$

19,185,660

 

Loans funded

 

 

600,000

 

 

 

 

Loans acquired from affiliates

 

 

21,188,250

 

 

 

14,274,123

 

Principal payments received

 

 

(14,611,262

)

 

 

(10,780,949

)

Principal, September 30

 

$

34,537,126

 

 

$

22,678,834

 

 

15


REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

Loan characteristics

Secured loans had the characteristics presented in the following table.

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Number of secured loans

 

 

88

 

 

 

75

 

Secured loans – principal

 

$

34,537,126

 

 

$

27,360,138

 

Secured loans – lowest interest rate (fixed)

 

 

7.0

%

 

 

7.5

%

Secured loans – highest interest rate (fixed)

 

 

10.0

%

 

 

10.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average secured loan – principal

 

$

392,467

 

 

$

364,801

 

Average principal as percent of total principal

 

 

1.1

%

 

 

1.3

%

Average principal as percent of members’ capital

 

 

1.0

%

 

 

1.3

%

Average principal as percent of total assets

 

 

1.0

%

 

 

1.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Largest secured loan – principal

 

$

1,350,000

 

 

$

1,200,000

 

Largest principal as percent of total principal

 

 

3.9

%

 

 

4.4

%

Largest principal as percent of members’ capital

 

 

3.5

%

 

 

4.2

%

Largest principal as percent of total assets

 

 

3.5

%

 

 

4.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Smallest secured loan – principal

 

$

14,223

 

 

$

45,906

 

Smallest principal as percent of total principal

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

0.2

%

Smallest principal as percent of members’ capital

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

0.2

%

Smallest principal as percent of total assets

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

0.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of counties where security is located (all California)

 

 

17

 

 

 

17

 

Largest percentage of principal in one county

 

 

23.7

%

 

 

32.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of secured loans in foreclosure

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Secured loans in foreclosure – principal

 

$

191,047

 

 

$

191,772

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of secured loans with an interest reserve

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest reserves

 

$

 

 

$

 

 


16


REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

Lien position

Secured loans had the lien positions presented in the following table.

 

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

Loans

 

 

Principal

 

 

Percent

 

 

Loans

 

 

Principal

 

 

Percent

 

First trust deeds

 

 

68

 

 

$

28,557,550

 

 

 

83

%

 

 

59

 

 

$

21,204,614

 

 

 

77

%

Second trust deeds

 

 

20

 

 

 

5,979,576

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

6,155,524

 

 

 

23

 

Total secured loans

 

 

88

 

 

 

34,537,126

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

75

 

 

 

27,360,138

 

 

 

100

%

Liens due other lenders at loan closing

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,972,632

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,564,255

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

 

 

 

 

$

45,509,758

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

36,924,393

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appraised property value at loan closing

 

 

 

 

 

$

96,526,082

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

71,836,840

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percent of total debt to appraised values (LTV) at

   loan closing(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

52.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

54.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Based on appraised values and liens due other lenders at loan closing. The weighted-average loan-to-value (LTV) computation above does not take into account subsequent increases or decreases in property values following the loan closing nor does it include decreases or increases of the amount owing on senior liens to other lenders.

Property type

Secured loans summarized by property type are presented in the following table.

 

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

Loans

 

 

Principal

 

 

Percent

 

 

Loans

 

 

Principal

 

 

Percent

 

Single family(2)

 

 

66

 

 

$

22,880,527

 

 

 

66

%

 

 

58

 

 

$

19,664,462

 

 

 

72

%

Multi-family

 

 

4

 

 

 

2,200,854

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

2,266,402

 

 

 

8

 

Commercial

 

 

18

 

 

 

9,455,745

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

5,429,274

 

 

 

20

 

Total secured loan balance

 

 

88

 

 

$

34,537,126

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

75

 

 

$

27,360,138

 

 

 

100

%

 

(2)

Single family property type as of September 30, 2016 consists of 11 loans with principal of $3,572,182 that are owner occupied and 55 loans with principal of $19,308,345 that are non-owner occupied.  At December 31, 2015, single family property consisted of six loans with principal of $2,098,628 that were owner occupied and 52 loans with principal of $17,565,834 that were non-owner occupied.

Delinquency

Secured loans summarized by payment delinquency are presented in the following table.

 

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

Loans

 

 

Amount

 

 

Loans

 

 

Amount

 

Past Due

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30-89 days

 

 

3

 

 

$

1,269,290

 

 

 

1

 

 

$

318,020

 

90-179 days

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

180 or more days

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total past due

 

 

3

 

 

 

1,269,290

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

318,020

 

Current

 

 

85

 

 

 

33,267,836

 

 

 

74

 

 

 

27,042,118

 

Total secured loan balance

 

 

88

 

 

$

34,537,126

 

 

 

75

 

 

$

27,360,138

 

 

17


REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

Modifications and troubled debt restructurings

There were no loan modifications made during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, and no modifications were in effect as of September 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015.

Loans in non-accrual status

At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there were no loans designated in non-accrual status.

Impaired loans/allowance for loan losses

At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the company had not designated any loans as impaired and had not recorded an allowance for loan losses, as all loans were deemed to have protective equity such that collection is reasonably assured for amounts owing.

Scheduled maturities

Secured loans are scheduled to mature as presented in the following table.

 

Scheduled maturities, as of September 30, 2016

 

Loans

 

 

Principal

 

 

Percent

 

2016(3)

 

 

7

 

 

$

2,940,688

 

 

 

9

%

2017

 

 

19

 

 

 

7,407,703

 

 

 

21

 

2018

 

 

20

 

 

 

9,364,895

 

 

 

27

 

2019

 

 

19

 

 

 

7,532,316

 

 

 

22

 

2020

 

 

11

 

 

 

2,642,860

 

 

 

7

 

2021

 

 

9

 

 

 

4,243,425

 

 

 

12

 

Thereafter

 

 

2

 

 

 

214,192

 

 

 

1

 

Total future maturities

 

 

87

 

 

 

34,346,079

 

 

 

99

 

Matured as of September 30, 2016(4)

 

 

1

 

 

 

191,047

 

 

 

1

 

Total secured loan balance

 

 

88

 

 

$

34,537,126

 

 

 

100

%

 

(3)

Loans maturing in 2016 from October 1 to December 31.

(4)

Loan matured in June 2016 and a multi-year extension is being negotiated.

Loans may be repaid or refinanced before, at or after the contractual maturity date.  On matured loans, the company may continue to accept payments while pursuing collection of amounts owed from borrowers.  Therefore, the above tabulation for scheduled maturities is not a forecast of future cash receipts.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, there were no renewals made.

18


REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

Distribution of loans within California

The distribution of secured loans outstanding by California counties is presented in the following table.

 

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

Percent

 

 

Principal

 

 

Percent

 

San Francisco Bay Area

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alameda

 

$

8,187,300

 

 

 

23.7

%

 

$

5,121,849

 

 

 

18.7

%

San Francisco

 

 

4,934,173

 

 

 

14.3

 

 

 

3,885,098

 

 

 

14.2

 

San Mateo

 

 

3,804,525

 

 

 

11.0

 

 

 

3,057,222

 

 

 

11.2

 

Solano

 

 

1,821,773

 

 

 

5.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contra Costa

 

 

1,403,454

 

 

 

4.0

 

 

 

1,303,036

 

 

 

4.7

 

Santa Clara

 

 

1,369,732

 

 

 

4.0

 

 

 

1,383,633

 

 

 

4.9

 

Marin

 

 

378,014

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

379,758

 

 

 

1.5

 

Sonoma

 

 

14,223

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

45,906

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

21,913,194

 

 

 

63.5

 

 

 

15,176,502

 

 

 

55.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Northern California

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monterey

 

 

2,022,868

 

 

 

5.9

 

 

 

559,304

 

 

 

2.1

 

Placer

 

 

1,076,175

 

 

 

3.1

 

 

 

359,118

 

 

 

1.3

 

Yolo

 

 

161,744

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

174,927

 

 

 

0.6

 

San Joaquin

 

 

158,648

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

159,533

 

 

 

0.6

 

Sacramento

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

214,607

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

 

3,419,435

 

 

 

9.9

 

 

 

1,467,489

 

 

 

5.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Northern California Total

 

 

25,332,629

 

 

 

73.4

 

 

 

16,643,991

 

 

 

60.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Los Angeles & Coastal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Los Angeles

 

 

7,255,595

 

 

 

21.0

 

 

 

8,841,419

 

 

 

32.3

 

San Diego

 

 

953,343

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

593,019

 

 

 

2.2

 

Orange

 

 

497,045

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

747,708

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

 

8,705,983

 

 

 

25.2

 

 

 

10,182,146

 

 

 

37.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Southern California

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Riverside

 

 

363,395

 

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

397,973

 

 

 

1.5

 

San Bernardino

 

 

135,119

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

136,028

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

 

498,514

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

534,001

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Southern California Total

 

 

9,204,497

 

 

 

26.6

 

 

 

10,716,147

 

 

 

39.2

 

Total Secured Loans

 

$

34,537,126

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

27,360,138

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

Commitments/loan disbursements/construction and rehabilitation loans

The company may make construction loans that are not fully disbursed at loan inception. Construction loans are determined by the manager to be those loans made to borrowers for the construction of entirely new structures or dwellings, whether residential, commercial or multi-family properties. The company will approve and fund the construction loan up to a maximum loan balance. Disbursements will be made periodically as phases of the construction are completed or at such other times as the loan documents may require. Undisbursed construction funds will be held in escrow pending disbursement. Upon project completion and receipt of a certificate of occupancy, construction loans are reclassified as permanent loans. Funding of construction loans is limited to 10% of the loan portfolio. At September 30, 2016, the company had no outstanding construction loans and no outstanding commitments to fund construction loans.

19


REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

The company may also make rehabilitation loans. A rehabilitation loan will be approved up to a maximum principal balance and, at loan inception, will be either fully or partially disbursed. If fully disbursed, a rehabilitation escrow account is established and advanced periodically as phases of the rehabilitation are completed or at such other times as the loan documents may require. If not fully disbursed, the rehabilitation loan will be funded from available cash balances and future cash receipts. The company does not maintain a separate cash reserve to fund undisbursed rehabilitation loan obligations. Rehabilitation loan proceeds are generally used to acquire and remodel single family homes for future sale or rental. Upon project completion, rehabilitation loans are reclassified as permanent loans. Funding of rehabilitation loans is limited to 15% of the loan portfolio. At September 30, 2016, the company had no outstanding rehabilitation loans and no outstanding commitments to fund rehabilitation loans.

Fair Value

The company does not record its loans at fair value on a recurring basis. Loans designated impaired (i.e., that are collateral dependent) are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The company did not have any loans designated impaired at September 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015.

-

Secured loans, performing (i.e., not designated as impaired) (Level 2) - Each loan is reviewed quarterly for its delinquency, LTV adjusted for the most recent valuation of the underlying collateral, remaining term to maturity, borrower’s payment history and other factors. Also considered is the limited resale market for the loans. Most companies or individuals making similar loans as the company intend to hold the loans until maturity as the average contractual term of the loans (and the historical experience of the time the loan is outstanding due to pre-payments) is shorter than conventional mortgages. As there are no prepayment penalties to be collected, loan buyers may be hesitant to risk paying above par. Due to these factors, sales of the loans are infrequent, because an active market does not exist. The recorded amount of the performing loans (i.e., the loan balance) is deemed to approximate the fair value, although the intrinsic value of the loans would reflect a premium due to the interest to be received.

-

Secured loans, designated impaired (Level 2) - Secured loans designated impaired are deemed collateral dependent, and the fair value of the loan is the lesser of the fair value of the collateral or the enforceable amount owing under the note. The fair value of the collateral is determined by exercise of judgment based on management’s experience informed by appraisals (by licensed appraisers), brokers’ opinion of values and publicly available information on in-market transactions (Level 2 inputs).

The following methods and assumptions are used to determine the fair value of the collateral securing a loan.

-

Single family – Management’s preferred method for determining the fair market value of the company’s single-family residential assets is the sale comparison (sale comps) method. Management primarily obtains sale comps through its subscription to the RealQuest service, but also uses free online services such as Zillow.com and other available resources to supplement this data. Sale comps are reviewed for similarity to the subject property, examining features such as proximity to subject, number of bedrooms and bathrooms, square footage, sale date, condition and year built.

If applicable sale comps are not available or deemed unreliable, management will seek additional information in the form of brokers’ opinions of value or appraisals.

-

Multi-family residential – Management’s preferred method for determining the aggregate retail value of the company’s  multifamily units is the sale comparison method. Sale comps are reviewed for similarity to the subject property, examining features such as proximity to subject, rental income, number of units, composition of units by the number of bedrooms and bathrooms, square footage, condition, amenities and year built.

Where adequate sale comps are not available, management will seek additional information in the form of brokers’ opinions of value or appraisals.

Management’s secondary method for valuing multifamily assets as income-producing rental operations is the direct capitalization method.  In order to determine market capitalization rates (cap rates) for properties of the same class and location as the subject, management refers to published data from reliable third-party sources such as the CBRE Cap Rate Survey. Management applies the appropriate cap rate to the subject’s most recent available annual net operating income to determine the property’s value as an income-producing project. When reliable net operating income information is not available or the project is under development or is under-performing to market, management will seek additional information and analysis to determine the cost to improve and the intrinsic fair value.

20


REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

Notes to Financial Statements

September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

-

Commercial buildings – Where commercial rental income information is available, management’s preferred method for determining the fair value of the company’s commercial real estate assets is the direct capitalization method. In order to determine market cap rates for properties of the same class and location as the subject, management refers to reputable third-party sources such as the CBRE Cap Rate Survey. Management then applies the appropriate cap rate to the subject’s most recent available annual net operating income to determine the property’s value as an income-producing commercial rental project. When reliable net operating income information is not available or the project is under development or is under-performing to market, management will seek additional information and analysis to determine the cost to improve and the intrinsic fair value.

Management supplements the direct capitalization method with additional information in the form of a sale comparison analysis (where adequate sale comps are available), brokers’ opinion of value, or appraisal.

-

Commercial land – Commercial land has many variations/uses, thus requiring management to employ a variety of methods depending upon the unique characteristics of the subject land. Management may rely on information in the form of a sale comparison analysis (where adequate sale comps are available), brokers’ opinion of value, or appraisal.

 

 

NOTE 5 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, OTHER THAN LOAN COMMITMENTS AND ORGANIZATION AND OFFERING COSTS

Legal proceedings

In the normal course of business, the company may become involved in various legal proceedings such as assignment of rents, bankruptcy proceedings, appointment of receivers, unlawful detainers, judicial foreclosure, etc. to enforce the provisions of the deeds of trust, collect the debt owed under the promissory notes or protect or recoup its investment from the real property secured by the deeds of trust and to resolve disputes between borrowers, lenders, lien holders and mechanics.  None of these actions typically would be of any material importance. As of September 30, 2016, the company was not involved in any legal proceedings other than those that would be considered part of the normal course of business.

Commitments

The company had no contractual obligations, except to reimburse RMC for O&O expenses.

 

 

NOTE 6 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

None.

 

 

 

21


 

Item 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and notes thereto, which are included in Item 1 of this report on Form 10-Q, as well as the audited financial statements and the notes thereto, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (or SEC). The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the operations results to be expected for the full year.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this report on Form 10-Q which are not historical facts may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (or the Exchange Act), including statements regarding the company’s expectations, hopes, intentions, beliefs and strategies regarding the future. Forward-looking statements, which are based on various assumptions (some of which are beyond our control), may be identified by reference to a future period or periods or by use of forward-looking terminology, such as “may,” “will,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “possible” or similar terms or variations on those terms or the negative of those terms.  Forward-looking statements include statements regarding trends in the California real estate market, future interest rates and economic conditions and their effect on the company and its assets, estimates as to the allowance for loan losses, estimates of future redemptions of units, future funding of loans by the company, and beliefs relating to how the company will be affected by current economic conditions and trends in the financial and credit markets.  Actual results may be materially different from what is projected by such forward-looking statements.  Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

changes in economic conditions and interest rates,

 

the impact of competition and competitive pricing for mortgage loans,

 

downturns in the California real estate markets which affect the manager’s and our ability to find suitable loans in a weaker economy where there is less activity in the real estate market,

 

our ability to grow our mortgage lending business,

 

the manager’s ability to make and arrange for loans that fit our investment criteria,

 

the concentration of credit risks to which we are exposed,

 

increases in payment delinquencies and defaults on our mortgage loans, and

 

changes in government regulation and legislative actions affecting our business.

All forward-looking statements and reasons why results may differ included in this Form 10-Q are made as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statement or reason why actual results may differ.

Overview

Redwood Mortgage Investors IX, LLC (or we, RMI IX or the company) is a Delaware limited liability company formed in October 2008 to engage in business as a mortgage lender and investor by making and holding-for-investment mortgage loans secured by California real estate, primarily through first and second deeds of trust. The company is externally managed. Redwood Mortgage Corp. (or RMC, the manager or management) is the manager of the company.

See Note 1 (Organization and General) to the financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report on Form 10-Q for additional detail on the organization and operations of RMI IX which detail is incorporated by this reference into this Item 2. For a detailed presentation of the company activities for which related parties are compensated and related transactions, including the formation loan to RMC, See Note 1 (Organization and General) and Note 3 (Manager and Other Related Parties) to the financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report, which presentation is incorporated by this reference into this Item 2.

Ongoing public offering of units/ SEC Registrations

In June, 2016, the company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed with the SEC (SEC File No. 333-208315) to offer up to 120,000,000 units ($120,000,000) to the public and 20,000,000 units ($20,000,000) to its members pursuant to the DRIP became effective and continues for up to three (3) years thereafter.

22


 

The units have been registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (or the Exchange Act). Such registration of the units, along with the satisfaction of certain other requirements under ERISA, enables the units to qualify as “publicly-offered securities” for purposes of ERISA and regulations issued thereunder. By satisfying those requirements, the underlying assets of the company should not be considered assets of a “benefit plan investor” (as defined under ERISA) by virtue of the investment by such benefit plan investor in the units.

The following summarizes the proceeds from sales of units, from inception (October 5, 2009) through September 30, 2016.

 

 

Proceeds

 

 

Gross proceeds admitted from investors

$

38,625,400

 

 

From electing members under our distribution reinvestment plan

 

3,850,100

 

 

From premiums paid by RMC

 

160,498

 

(1)

Total proceeds from unit sales

$

42,635,998

 

 

 

(1)

If a member acquired units through an unsolicited sale, the member’s capital account is credited with their capital contribution plus a premium paid by RMC equal to the amount of the sales commissions that otherwise would have been paid to a broker-dealer by RMC. This amount is reported in the year paid as taxable income to the member.

The proceeds from the sales of the units will not be segregated but will be commingled with the company’s cash. The ongoing sources of funds for loans are the proceeds from (1) sale of units, including units sold by reinvestment of distributions, (2) loan payoffs, (3) borrowers’ monthly principal and interest payments, and (4) to a lesser degree and, if obtained, a line of credit. Cash generated from loan payoffs and borrower payments of principal and interest is used for operating expenses, income distributions to members, reimbursements to RMC of O&O expenses, and unit redemptions. The cash flow, if any, in excess of these uses is reinvested in new loans.

Critical Accounting Policies

See Note 2 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to the financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report on Form 10-Q for a detailed presentation of critical accounting policies, which presentation is incorporated by this reference into this Item 2.

Results of Operations

General Economic Conditions - California

All of our mortgage loans are secured by California real estate. Our secured-loan investment activity and the value of the real estate securing our loans is significantly dependent on economic activity and employment conditions in the state. Wells Fargo’s Economics Group periodically provides timely, relevant information and analysis in its commentary and reports regarding California’s employment and economic conditions. Highlights from recently issued reports from Wells Fargo Securities Economic Group are presented below.

In the publication “California Employment Conditions” August 2016 (dated September 16, 2016), the Wells Fargo Economics Group notes:

California employers added 63,100 net new jobs in August, marking the second largest increase over the past year. The breakneck pace of hiring brought year-to-year nonfarm employment growth to 2.3 percent, which translates into an annual gain of 378,000 jobs. Nearly half of last month’s increase came from government employment, which added an outsized 27,900 jobs in August, with most of that gain occurring at the local level. We suspect that August’s unusually large rise in public sector payrolls is due to seasonal adjustment quirks surrounding the start of the school year. Local government payrolls tumbled in July for instance, and have added only 35,500 jobs over the past year.

Outside of the surge in government hiring, the jobs picture still looks solid. Private sector payrolls added 35,200 jobs in August and have added 332,800 jobs over the past year. Hiring in California’s important professional, scientific & technical services sector, which includes tech-related professions such as engineering, computer systems design and scientific research ramped up in August. Payrolls rose by 13,100 on the month, pushing the annual gain over 60,000. Energy-related industries continued to shed jobs in August, with employment in mining & logging reporting a loss of 400 jobs. In addition, manufacturers cut 3,400 jobs. Both industries have seen employment declines over the past year.

On a regional basis, the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale metropolitan area accounted for the bulk of August’s gains, as employment rose by 15,300 jobs on the month. Riverside and Sacramento also reported healthy increases, each seeing payrolls rise by more than 5,000.

23


 

Recently released data from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) for the first quarter suggests that the Current Employment Statistics (CES), which is reported on a more frequent month-to-month basis, has understated job growth in California’s key information sector. The industry captures many tech-related professions, including positions in search portals, software and data processing, as well as occupations in the motion picture industry. The CES had estimated that information payrolls rose 3.4 percent year-to-year in the first quarter while the QCEW data show an 8.5 percent gain, marking the strongest pace since 2001. Hiring in the state’s sizable motion picture and sound recording industry rose at a staggering 16 percent year-to-year pace in the first quarter, according to the QCEW data, much stronger than the CES’s 1.9 percent estimate. Total job growth was also understated for the Los Angeles and San Francisco metro areas, as the QCEW reported a 3.0 percent and 3.8 percent increase, respectively, versus 2.5 percent and 3.5 percent in the CES.

In the publication: “California Mid-Year Economic Update” (dated June 23, 2016), the Wells Fargo Economics Group Notes:

Newly Released Data Show Stronger GDP Growth in the Golden State – While a few signs of slowing are evident, California’s economy remains in the midst of a tremendous run of economic growth. Nonfarm employment growth has averaged nearly three percent over the past three years, and the state’s jobless rate has tumbled to 5.2 percent, narrowing the gap to the U.S. rate to just half a percentage point.  California’s good fortune has largely been due to the rapid growth of technology, knowledge-based and creative industries.

Recently released data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis put some solid numbers behind California’s recent performance.  Real gross domestic product (GDP) grew 4.1 percent in 2015 to 2.46 trillion…. Growth slowed during the second half of the year, however, with real GDP rising at 2.7 percent annualized in the fourth quarter and averaging just 1.6 percent during the second half of the year. This past year marked the strongest growth rate since 2004 and was also one of the fastest growth rates of any state, tying Oregon for the largest percentage gain.  California easily outpaced the national average for the fourth consecutive year, as the nation grew at a lesser 2.4 percent growth pace.  California, which accounts for 13.8 percent of national GDP, accounted for 23.8 percent of the nation’s growth in 2015.

California’s world-renown technology sector, which is largely captured in the information and professional, scientific & technical services sectors, continued in the fourth quarter. The two sectors made the most significant contribution to California’s real GDP growth, contributing a combined 1.3 percentage points to the 2.7 percent overall annualized growth during the quarter.  Moreover, tech-related growth in California has far outpaced the national average over the past year, with tech output growing by a larger 10.3 percent in the California relative to a 6.0 percent gain nationwide.

Housing remains a bright spot in the state’s economy, as California’s burgeoning employment and population growth continues to fuel demand for new homes.  Residential construction activity ramped up in 2015, with single-family permits registering 44,132 units for the year, marking their highest level since 2007. The multifamily market also continued to thrive, with 53,479 units permitted in 2015. The gains in housing helped boost construction output, which accounted for 0.26 percentage points of real GDP growth in the fourth quarter. That said, we expect the pace of construction to moderate slightly through the balance of this year and in 2017. Multifamily development is set to cool from its breakneck pace and population growth is likely to take a bit of a breather, as residents and would-be residents re-examine the costs and the benefits of living in expensive coastal regions in the Bay Area and Southern California.

Performance highlights

Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $679,192 and $451,303, respectively. Revenue from the interest on loans, gross for the three months ended September 30, 2016 increased by approximately $238,000 over the same period in 2015, due to the growth of the secured loan portfolio.  Operations expense for the three months ended September 30, 2016 increased by approximately $8,000, over the same period in 2015, due primarily to an increase in mortgage servicing fees and was offset by waived fees and costs absorbed by RMC. In the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the manager, at its sole discretion, provided significant financial support to the company by waiving fees and absorbing expenses, which had the effect of increasing net income. No assurance can be given that RMC will continue to provide net income support in the future.

Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $1,862,714 and $1,182,341, respectively. Revenue from the interest on loans, gross for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 increased by approximately $593,000 over the same period in 2015, due to the growth of the secured loan portfolio, and a consistent average interest rate.  Operations expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 decreased by approximately $31,000, over the same period in 2015, due primarily to an increase in mortgage servicing fees which was more than offset by fees waived and expenses absorbed by RMC. In the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the manager, at its sole discretion, provided significant financial support to the company by waiving fees and absorbing expenses, which had the effect of increasing net income. No assurance can be given that RMC will continue to provide net income support in the future.

24


 

The fee waivers and expenses absorbed by RMC were not made for the purpose of providing the company with sufficient funds to satisfy withdrawal requests, nor to meet any required level of distributions, as the company has no such required level of distributions. Any decision by RMC to waive fees and/or to absorb expenses, and the amount (if any) to be waived or absorbed, is made by RMC in its sole discretion. In determining the level of fees to be waived and/or expenses to be absorbed, RMC generally has been guided by the primary investment objectives of RMI IX to yield a favorable rate of return and to generate and distribute cash flow from investment activities (for 2016 and 2015 an annualized distribution rate of 6.5% of members’ capital account balances).  Beginning in 2016, members’ capital accounts (except contributions via DRIP units) are assessed 0.45% annually for 10 years for allocations of O&O expenses, and RMC has maintained net income support sufficient so that the O&O expense allocation is made without causing a reduction in members’ capital account balances (See Note 3 (Manager and Other Related Parties) to the financial statements included in Part 1, Item 1 of this report, incorporated herein by reference.)

Key Performance Indicators

The table below shows key performance indicators at and for the nine months ended September 30.

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

Members’ capital, gross – end of period balance

 

$

40,386,920

 

 

 

27,636,073

 

 

 

20,768,621

 

 

Members’ capital, gross – average balance

 

$

35,793,150

 

 

 

24,855,900

 

 

 

18,991,196

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured loans – end of period balance

 

$

34,537,126

 

 

 

22,678,834

 

 

 

17,641,037

 

 

Secured loans – average daily balance

 

$

30,158,651

 

 

 

20,914,565

 

 

 

16,040,345

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest on loans, gross

 

$

1,945,598

 

 

 

1,352,544

 

 

 

1,070,084

 

 

Portfolio interest rate(1)

 

 

8.6

%

 

 

8.6

%

 

 

9.0

%

 

Effective yield rate(2)

 

 

8.6

%

 

 

8.6

%

 

 

8.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of loan administrative fees, net

 

$

28,138

 

 

 

79,950

 

 

 

80,627

 

 

Percent of average daily balance(3)

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

0.5

%

 

 

0.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest on loans, net

 

$

1,917,460

 

 

 

1,272,594

 

 

 

989,457

 

 

Percent of average daily balance(3)

 

 

8.5

%

 

 

8.1

%

 

 

8.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for loan losses

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percent of average daily balance(3)

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operations expense

 

$

66,098

 

 

 

97,536

 

 

 

266,354

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income

 

$

1,862,714

 

 

 

1,182,341

 

 

 

730,644

 

 

Percent of average members’ capital(4)(5)

 

 

6.9

%

 

 

6.3

%

 

 

5.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Member Distributions

 

$

1,723,613

 

 

 

1,254,564

 

 

 

950,096

 

 

Percent

 

 

6.5

%

 

 

6.5

%

 

 

6.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Member Redemptions(6)

 

$

600,645

 

 

 

788,611

 

 

 

50,053

 

 

 

(1)

Stated note interest rate, weighted daily average

(2)

Yield rate of interest on loans, annualized

(3)

Percent of secured loans – average daily balance, annualized

(4)

Percent of members’ capital, gross – average balance, annualized

(5)

Percent based on the net income available to members (excluding 1% allocated to manager)

(6)

Redemptions are made once a quarter, on the last business day of the quarter. The unit redemption program is ongoing and available to members beginning one year after the purchase of the units. The maximum number of units that may be redeemed in any year and the maximum amount of redemption available in any period to members are subject to certain limitations.

 

25


 

The table below shows key performance indicators at and for the three months ended September 30.

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

Members’ capital, gross – end of period balance

 

$

40,386,920

 

 

 

27,636,073

 

 

 

20,768,621

 

 

Members’ capital, gross – average balance

 

$

38,852,682

 

 

 

26,588,790

 

 

 

20,229,343

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured loans – end of period balance

 

$

34,537,126

 

 

 

22,678,834

 

 

 

17,641,037

 

 

Secured loans – average daily balance

 

$

32,923,239

 

 

 

21,646,398

 

 

 

17,128,667

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest on loans, gross

 

$

706,343

 

 

 

468,695

 

 

 

366,153

 

 

Portfolio interest rate(1)

 

 

8.6

%

 

 

8.6

%

 

 

8.8

%

 

Effective yield rate(2)

 

 

8.6

%

 

 

8.6

%

 

 

8.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of loan administrative fees, net

 

 

9,799

 

 

 

5,732

 

 

 

24,875

 

 

Percent of average daily balance(3)

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

0.1

%

 

 

0.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest on loans, net

 

$

696,544

 

 

 

462,963

 

 

 

341,278

 

 

Percent of average daily balance(3)

 

 

8.5

%

 

 

8.6

%

 

 

8.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for loan losses

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percent of average daily balance(3)

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operations expense

 

$

21,891

 

 

 

13,611

 

 

 

77,691

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income

 

$

679,192

 

 

 

451,303

 

 

 

266,851

 

 

Percent of average members’ capital(4)(5)

 

 

6.9

%

 

 

6.7

%

 

 

5.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Member Distributions

 

$

624,011

 

 

 

447,896

 

 

 

337,647

 

 

Percent

 

 

6.5

%

 

 

6.5

%

 

 

6.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Member Redemptions(6)

 

$

208,520

 

 

 

286,771

 

 

 

50,053

 

 

 

(1)

Stated note interest rate, weighted daily average

(2)

Yield rate of interest on loans, annualized

(3)

Percent of secured loans – average daily balance, annualized

(4)

Percent of members’ capital, gross – average balance, annualized

(5)

Percent based on the net income available to members (excluding 1% allocated to manager)

(6)

Redemptions are made once a quarter, on the last business day of the quarter.  The unit redemption program is ongoing and available to members beginning one year after the purchase of the units.  The maximum number of units that may be redeemed in any year and the maximum amount of redemption available in any period to members are subject to certain limitations.

Members’ capital, gross – end of period balance

The September 30 end of period gross members’ capital balance for 2016 of $40,386,920, was an increase of approximately 46% ($12.8 million) over 2015’s $27,636,073.  The increase was due to new member sales and participation in our distribution reinvestment plan (DRIP), which was partially offset by redemptions and distributions. The company is continually seeking to increase the number of FINRA registered broker-dealer firms and their associated representatives that can sell our units and is focusing on expanding the states in which our units can be offered.

 

26


 

The table below shows distributions reinvested by members under the DRIP, total cash distributions to members and the percent of members’ capital electing cash distribution for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

 

 

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

 

 

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015

 

Reinvesting

 

$

970,934

 

 

$

719,168

 

Distributing

 

 

752,679

 

 

 

535,397

 

Total

 

$

1,723,613

 

 

$

1,254,565

 

Percent of members’ capital, electing distribution

 

 

44

%

 

 

43

%

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operations, net income and distributions to members, for quarters ended March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2016, are summarized in the following table:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percent Of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions

 

 

Percent Of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paid From

 

 

Net Income

 

 

 

 

Net Cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Cash

 

 

Available to

 

 

 

 

Provided By

 

 

Net Income

 

 

Distributions

 

 

Provided By

 

 

Members

 

 

 

 

(Used In)

 

 

Available

 

 

To

 

 

(Used In)

 

 

to Member

 

 

Quarter

 

Operations

 

 

To Members

 

 

Members(1)

 

 

Operations

 

 

Distributions (2)

 

 

2016 Q1

 

$

549,076

 

 

$

564,457

 

 

$

527,520

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

107

%

 

2016 Q2

 

 

626,157

 

 

 

607,229

 

 

 

572,082

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

106

%

 

2016 Q3

 

 

676,917

 

 

 

672,400

 

 

 

624,011

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

108

%

 

 

 

$

1,852,150

 

 

$

1,844,086

 

 

$

1,723,613

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

107

%

 

 

(1)

Includes distributions reinvested pursuant to our DRIP.

(2)

RMC, at its sole discretion, provided significant financial support to the company by waiving fees and absorbing expenses which had the effect of increasing net income. Beginning in 2016, members’ capital accounts (except contributions via DRIP units) are assessed 0.45% annually for 10 years for allocations of O&O expenses, and RMC has maintained net income support sufficient so that the O&O expense allocation is made without causing a reduction in members’ capital account balances.

Secured loans – end-of-period balance

The September 30, 2016 end of period secured loan balance of $34,537,126 was an increase of approximately 52% ($11.9 million) over 2015’s $22,678,834. The increase in the balance of the secured loan portfolio is due to increased members’ capital available for lending and increased investment in California real estate markets, which expands the market for new loans. Secured loans as a percent of members’ capital (based on average daily balances) was 84.7% and 81.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The company added approximately $3,425,000 and $15,696,000 of new loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.

As of September 30, 2016, 83 of the company’s 88 loans (representing 98% of the aggregate principal of the company’s loan portfolio) had a loan term of five years or less from loan inception. The remaining loans had terms longer than five years. Substantially all loans are written without a prepayment penalty provision. As of September 30, 2016, 20 loans outstanding (representing 29% of the aggregate principal balance of the company’s loan portfolio) provided for monthly payments of interest only, with the principal due in full at maturity. The remaining loans required monthly payments of principal and interest, typically calculated on a 30-year amortization, with the remaining principal balance due at maturity.

We have sought to exercise strong discipline in underwriting loan applications and lending against collateral at amounts that create a mortgage portfolio that has substantial protective equity as indicated by the overall conservative weighted average loan-to-value ratio (LTV) which at September 30, 2016 was 52.0%. Thus, per the appraisal-based valuations at the time of loan inception, borrowers have, in the aggregate, equity of 48.0% in the property, and we as lender have lent in the aggregate 52.0% (including other senior liens on the property) against the properties we hold as collateral for the repayment of our loans.

See Note 4 (Loans) to the financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report for detailed presentations of the characteristics of the secured loan portfolio and on the allowance for loan losses, which presentations are incorporated by this reference into this Item 2.

27


 

Analysis and discussion of income/(loss) from operations 2016 v. 2015 (for the nine months ended)

Significant changes to income or expense areas for the nine month period ended September 30, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 are summarized in the following table.

 

 

 

Interest

Income

 

 

Provision/

Allowance

For Loan

Losses

 

 

Late

Fees

 

 

Operations

Expense

 

 

Net

Income

 

 

For the nine months ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

$

1,917,460

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,352

 

 

 

66,098

 

 

 

1,862,714

 

 

September 30, 2015

 

 

1,272,594

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,283

 

 

 

97,536

 

 

 

1,182,341

 

 

Change

 

$

644,866

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,069

 

 

 

(31,438

)

 

 

680,373

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loan Balance Increase

 

$

692,879

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,035

 

 

 

675,844

 

 

Loan Portfolio Effective Yield Rate

 

 

(48,013

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(48,013

)

 

Late Fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,069

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,069

 

 

Capital Balance Increase

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

132,010

 

 

 

(132,010

)

 

Managers Fees/Costs Waived

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(168,296

)

 

 

168,296

 

 

Manager Reimbursements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,716

)

 

 

7,716

 

 

Expense Recognition Timing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,982

 

 

 

(5,982

)

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,453

)

 

 

10,453

 

 

Change

 

$

644,866

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,069

 

 

 

(31,438

)

 

 

680,373

 

 

 

Interest income

Interest on loans, net increased $644,866 (51%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015 due to growth of the secured loan portfolio offset by a reduction in yield. The portfolio’s strong payment history to date has resulted in no loans being designated as non-accrual.  

Provision for loan losses/allowance for loan losses

At September 30, 2016, the company had no allowance for loan losses as no loans were designated as impaired, and all loans had protective equity such that at September 30, 2016, collection was deemed probable for amounts owing. There were no loans past due more than 90 days at September 30, 2016.

Operations Expense

Significant changes to operating expense areas for the nine month period ended September 30, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 are summarized in the following table.

 

 

 

Mortgage

Servicing

Fees

 

 

Asset

Management

Fees, net

 

 

Costs

From

RMC, net

 

 

Professional

Services, net

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

 

For the nine months ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

$

55,749

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,500

 

 

 

5,849

 

 

 

66,098

 

 

September 30, 2015

 

 

38,714

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,286

 

 

 

8,359

 

 

 

14,177

 

 

 

97,536

 

 

Change

 

$

17,035

 

 

 

 

 

 

(36,286

)

 

 

(3,859

)

 

 

(8,328

)

 

 

(31,438

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loan Balance Increase

 

$

17,035

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,035

 

 

Capital Balance Increase

 

 

 

 

 

53,712

 

 

 

78,298

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

132,010

 

 

Managers Fees/Costs Waived

 

 

 

 

 

(53,712

)

 

 

(114,584

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(168,296

)

 

Manager Reimbursement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,716

)

 

 

 

 

 

(7,716

)

 

Professional Service Timing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,982

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,982

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,125

)

 

 

(8,328

)

 

 

(10,453

)

 

Change

 

$

17,035

 

 

 

 

 

 

(36,286

)

 

 

(3,859

)

 

 

(8,328

)

 

 

(31,438

)

 

28


 

– Mortgage servicing fees

The increase in mortgage servicing fees of $17,035 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015 was due to the increase in the secured loan portfolio.

– Asset management fees, net

Total asset management fees chargeable increased by $53,712 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015 due to the increase in members’ capital. All asset management fees chargeable for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were waived by RMC, at its sole discretion.  There is no assurance RMC will waive its right to receive such fees in future periods.

– Costs through RMC, net

Costs incurred by RMC, for which reimbursement could have been requested increased by $78,298 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015 primarily due to the increases in members’ capital. The total amount of such costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was waived by RMC, at its sole discretion. There is no assurance RMC will waive its right to receive such reimbursements in future periods.

– Professional services, net

Professional fees consists primarily of legal, audit and tax expenses. The decrease in professional services for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, was due primarily to manager reimbursements.

Analysis and discussion of income/(loss) from operations 2016 v. 2015 (for the three months ended)

Significant changes to income or expense areas for the three month period ended September 30, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 are summarized in the following table.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision/ Allowance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

 

For Loan

 

 

Late

 

 

Operations

 

 

Net

 

 

 

Income

 

 

Losses

 

 

Fees

 

 

Expense

 

 

Income

 

For the three months ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

$

696,544

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,539

 

 

 

21,891

 

 

 

679,192

 

September 30, 2015

 

 

462,963

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,951

 

 

 

13,611

 

 

 

451,303

 

Change

 

$

233,581

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,588

 

 

 

8,280

 

 

 

227,889

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loan Balance Increase

 

$

250,534

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,727

 

 

 

243,807

 

Loan Portfolio Effective Yield Rate

 

 

(16,953

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(16,953

)

Late Fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,588

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,588

 

Capital Balance Increase

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

47,618

 

 

 

(47,618

)

Managers Fees Waived

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(47,618

)

 

 

47,618

 

Managers Reimbursement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,553

 

 

 

(1,553

)

Change

 

$

233,581

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,588

 

 

 

8,280

 

 

 

227,889

 

 

Interest income

Interest on loans, net increased $233,581 (50%) for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015 due to growth of the secured loan portfolio offset by decreases in the effective yield. The portfolio’s strong payment history to date has resulted in no loans being designated as non-accrual.  

Provision for loan losses/allowance for loan losses

At September 30, 2016, the company had no allowance for loan losses as no loans were designated as impaired, and all loans had protective equity such that at September 30, 2016, collection was deemed probable for amounts owing. There were no loans past due more than 90 days at September 30, 2016.

29


 

Operations Expense

Significant changes to operating expense areas for the three month period ended September 30, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 are summarized in the following table.

 

 

 

Mortgage

Servicing

Fees

 

 

Asset

Management

Fees, net

 

 

Costs

From

RMC, net

 

 

Professional

Services, net

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

For the three months ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

$

20,228

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,663

 

 

 

21,891

 

September 30, 2015

 

 

13,501

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

110

 

 

 

13,611

 

Change

 

$

6,727

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,553

 

 

 

8,280

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loan Balance Increase

 

$

6,727

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,727

 

Capital Balance Increase

 

 

 

 

 

20,415

 

 

 

27,203

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

47,618

 

Managers Fees Waived

 

 

 

 

 

(20,415

)

 

 

(27,203

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(47,618

)

Manager Reimbursement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,553

 

 

 

1,553

 

Change

 

$

6,727

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,553

 

 

 

8,280

 

 

– Mortgage servicing fees

The increase in mortgage servicing fees of $6,727 for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015 was due to the increase in the secured loan portfolio.

– Asset management fees, net

Total asset management fees chargeable increased by $20,415 for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015 due to the increase in members’ capital. All asset management fees chargeable for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were waived by RMC, at its sole discretion. There is no assurance RMC will waive its right to receive such fees in future periods.

– Costs through RMC, net

Costs incurred by RMC, for which reimbursement could have been requested increased by $27,203 for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015 primarily due to the increases in members’ capital. The total amount of such costs for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was waived by RMC, at its sole discretion. There is no assurance RMC will waive its right to receive such reimbursements in future periods.

– Professional services, net

Professional fees consists primarily of legal, audit and tax expenses. The total amount of such costs for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was reimbursed by RMC, at its sole discretion. There is no assurance RMC ill reimburse these costs in the future.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The ongoing sources of funds for loans are the proceeds from (1) sale of units, including units sold by reinvestment of distributions, (2) loan payoffs, (3) borrowers’ monthly principal and interest payments, and, (4) to a lesser degree and, if obtained, a line of credit.  Cash generated from loan payoffs and borrower payments of principal and interest is used for operating expenses, income distributions to members, reimbursements to RMC of O&O expenses and unit redemptions in the next 12 months.  The cash flow, if any, in excess of these uses is re-invested in new loans.

Loan transactions for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 are summarized in a table included at Note 4 (Loans), and members’ capital transactions for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, are summarized in the Statement of Changes in Members’ Capital, both included in Part 1, Item 1 of the report on Form 10-Q, and both are incorporated by this reference in this Item2.

30


 

Cash Receipts and disbursements

Cash receipts and disbursements by business activity are presented in the following table for the three and nine months ended September 30.

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended September 30,

 

 

For the Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Loan principal/advances/interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal & advances collected

 

$

4,105,900

 

 

$

4,722,724

 

 

$

14,613,238

 

 

$

10,767,338

 

Interest received, net

 

 

690,103

 

 

 

469,814

 

 

 

1,908,796

 

 

 

1,242,028

 

Other loan income

 

 

4,589

 

 

 

1,951

 

 

 

11,502

 

 

 

7,283

 

Loan funding

 

 

(7,620,750

)

 

 

(5,256,730

)

 

 

(21,788,250

)

 

 

(14,274,123

)

Cash – loans, net

 

 

(2,820,158

)

 

 

(62,241

)

 

 

(5,254,714

)

 

 

(2,257,474

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operations Expense

 

 

(17,775

)

 

 

(13,179

)

 

 

(68,148

)

 

 

(19,296

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Members’ capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross subscription proceeds

 

 

3,925,921

 

 

 

1,969,425

 

 

 

10,028,663

 

 

 

6,063,454

 

Organization and offering costs, net

 

 

(121,616

)

 

 

(98,744

)

 

 

(358,351

)

 

 

(276,062

)

Formation loan, net

 

 

(273,910

)

 

 

(138,980

)

 

 

(689,746

)

 

 

(416,633

)

Distributions and redemptions, net

 

 

(486,531

)

 

 

(475,803

)

 

 

(1,370,896

)

 

 

(1,334,944

)

Cash – members’ capital, net

 

 

3,043,864

 

 

 

1,255,898

 

 

 

7,609,670

 

 

 

4,035,815

 

Net change in cash

 

$

205,931

 

 

$

1,180,478

 

 

$

2,286,808

 

 

$

1,759,045

 

The presentation above differs in format from the Statements of Cash Flows included in Part I, Item 1 of this report and emphasizes net cash generated or used in the company’s primary business activities.  The format of the Statements of Cash Flows is defined by GAAP.

Contractual obligations

At September 30, 2016 the company had no contractual obligations, except to reimburse RMC for O&O expenses. See Note 3 (Manager and Other Related Parties) to the financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report for detailed presentations of the company activities for which related parties are compensated and related transactions, which presentations are incorporated by this reference into this Item 2.

At September 30, 2016 the company had no construction or rehabilitation loans outstanding.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

 

 

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not included because the company is a smaller reporting company.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the manager of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the manager concluded the company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the manager’s or company’s internal control over financial reporting.

31


 

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of business, the company may become involved in various legal proceedings such as assignment of rents, bankruptcy proceedings, appointment of receivers, unlawful detainers, judicial foreclosure, etc. to enforce the provisions of the deeds of trust, collect the debt owed under the promissory notes or protect or recoup its investment from the real property secured by the deeds of trust and to resolve disputes between borrowers, lenders, lien holders and mechanics. None of these actions typically would be of any material importance.  As of September 30, 2016, the company was not involved in any legal proceedings other than those that would be considered part of the normal course of business.

ITEM 1A.

Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

ITEM 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

There were no sales of securities by the company which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.

Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

In June 2016, the company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 filed with the SEC (SEC File No. 333-208315) to offer up to 120,000,000 units ($120,000,000) to the public and 20,000,000 units ($20,000,000) to its members pursuant to the DRIP became effective and is effective for up to three (3) years thereafter.

The units have been registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.  Such registration of the units, along with the satisfaction of certain other requirements under ERISA, enables the units to qualify as “publicly-offered securities” for purposes of ERISA and regulations issued thereunder.  By satisfying those requirements, the underlying assets of the company should not be considered assets of a “benefit plan investor” (as defined under ERISA) by virtue of the investment by such benefit plan investor in the units.

The following summarizes the proceeds from sales of units from inception (October 5, 2009) through September 30, 2016.

 

 

Proceeds

 

 

Gross proceeds admitted from investors

$

38,625,400

 

 

From electing members under our distribution reinvestment plan

 

3,850,100

 

 

From premiums paid by RMC

 

160,498

 

(1)

Total proceeds from unit sales

$

42,635,998

 

 

 

 

(1)

If a member acquired units through an unsolicited sale, the member’s capital account is credited with their capital contribution plus a premium paid by RMC equal to the amount of the sales commissions that otherwise would have been paid to a broker-dealer by RMC.  This amount is reported in the year paid as taxable income to the member.

The proceeds from the sales of the units will not be segregated but will be commingled with the company’s cash. The ongoing sources of funds for loans are the proceeds from (1) sale of units, including units sold by reinvestment of distributions, (2) loan payoffs, (3) borrowers’ monthly principal and interest payments, and (4) to a lesser degree and, if obtained, a line of credit. Cash generated from loan payoffs and borrower payments of principal and interest is used for operating expenses, reimbursements to RMC of organization and offering expenses, and unit redemptions. The cash flow, if any, in excess of these uses is reinvested in new loans.

For a description of the formation loan advances made by RMI IX to RMC from offering proceeds to pay B/D sales commissions, see Note 3 (Manager and other Related Parties) to the financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report, which information is incorporated by reference in this Part II, Item 2.

Redemptions are made once a quarter, on the last business day of the quarter. Redemptions for the three months ended September 30, 2016 were $208,520. The unit redemption program is ongoing and available to members beginning one year after the purchase of the units.  The maximum number of units that may be redeemed in any year and the maximum amount of redemption available in any period to members are subject to certain limitations.

32


 

ITEM 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

ITEM 5.

Other Information

None.

ITEM 6.

Exhibits

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description of Exhibits

 

 

 

10.7

 

Form of advisory agreement

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Manager pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification of Manager pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document

 

 

 

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

 

 

 

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

33


 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS IX, LLC

 

(Registrant)

 

 

 

Date:  November 10, 2016

By:

Redwood Mortgage Corp., Manager

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Michael R. Burwell

 

 

Name:

Michael R. Burwell

 

 

Title:

President, Secretary and Treasurer

 

 

 

(On behalf of the registrant, and in the capacity of principal financial officer)

 

34


 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description of Exhibits

 

 

 

10.7

 

Form of advisory agreement

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Manager pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification of Manager pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document

 

 

 

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

 

 

 

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

35