Attached files

file filename
EX-10.5 - EX-10.5 - ALTEVA, INC.a15-18006_1ex10d5.htm
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - ALTEVA, INC.a15-18006_1ex32d2.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - ALTEVA, INC.a15-18006_1ex32d1.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - ALTEVA, INC.a15-18006_1ex31d1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - ALTEVA, INC.a15-18006_1ex31d2.htm

Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

Form 10-Q

 

x      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015

 

OR

 

o         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from           to          

 

Commission File No. 001-35724

 


 

Alteva, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

New York

 

14-1160510

(State or other jurisdiction of

 

(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)

 

Identification No.)

 

 

 

400 Market Street, Suite 1100

 

 

Philadelphia, PA

 

19106

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone, including area code:   (877) 258-3722

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES x    NO o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  YES x   NO o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Smaller reporting company x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  YES o    NO x

 

The number of shares of Alteva, Inc. common stock outstanding as of November 5, 2015 was 5,981,352.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

Index to Form 10-Q

 

Part I

Financial Information

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (unaudited)

3

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (unaudited)

4

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2015 (unaudited) and December 31, 2014

5

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (unaudited)

6

 

 

 

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

7

 

 

 

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

19

 

 

 

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

23

 

 

 

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

23

 

 

 

Part II

Other Information

 

 

 

 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

23

 

 

 

Item 6.

Exhibits

25

 

2



Table of Contents

 

Part I — Financial Information

 

Item 1.  Financial Statements

 

 

ALTEVA, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unified Communications

 

$

4,718

 

$

4,308

 

$

13,703

 

$

12,753

 

Telephone

 

3,252

 

3,263

 

9,915

 

9,946

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating revenues

 

7,970

 

7,571

 

23,618

 

22,699

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense)

 

3,201

 

2,924

 

9,687

 

8,843

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

6,015

 

4,726

 

16,664

 

15,686

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

891

 

931

 

3,383

 

2,753

 

Restructuring costs and other special charges

 

 

600

 

 

700

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

10,107

 

9,181

 

29,734

 

27,982

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating loss

 

(2,137

)

(1,610

)

(6,116

)

(5,283

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest (expense) income, net

 

(2

)

20

 

10

 

(173

)

Income from investment

 

 

 

 

52,373

 

Other income (expense), net

 

25

 

(4

)

1,515

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total other income, net

 

23

 

16

 

1,525

 

52,223

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes

 

(2,114

)

(1,594

)

(4,591

)

46,940

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax (benefit) expense

 

(296

)

(264

)

(753

)

16,982

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

(1,818

)

(1,330

)

(3,838

)

29,958

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred dividends

 

6

 

6

 

19

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income applicable to common stock

 

$

(1,824

)

$

(1,336

)

$

(3,857

)

$

29,939

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic (loss) earnings per common share

 

$

(0.31

)

$

(0.23

)

$

(0.66

)

$

4.96

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share

 

$

(0.31

)

$

(0.23

)

$

(0.66

)

$

4.96

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares of common stock used to calculate loss per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

5,871

 

5,826

 

5,853

 

5,802

 

Diluted

 

5,871

 

5,826

 

5,853

 

5,802

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends declared per common share

 

$

 

$

 

$

2.60

 

$

 

 

Please see accompanying notes, which are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

ALTEVA, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(1,818

)

$

(1,330

)

$

(3,838

)

$

29,958

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit pension plans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of prior service costs

 

3

 

(35

)

8

 

(105

)

Amortization of actuarial loss

 

258

 

148

 

774

 

515

 

Other comprehensive income

 

261

 

113

 

782

 

410

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive (loss) income

 

$

(1,557

)

$

(1,217

)

$

(3,056

)

$

30,368

 

 

Please see accompanying notes, which are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

ALTEVA, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

6,471

 

$

24,047

 

Trade accounts receivable - net of allowance for uncollectibles - $421 and $402 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively

 

2,919

 

2,737

 

Other accounts receivable

 

598

 

488

 

Materials and supplies

 

273

 

167

 

Prepaid expenses

 

703

 

349

 

Prepaid income taxes

 

498

 

311

 

Receivable and deferred income taxes

 

1,190

 

43

 

Total current assets

 

12,652

 

28,142

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

11,050

 

12,384

 

Intangibles, net

 

4,382

 

5,020

 

Seat licenses, net

 

1,537

 

1,543

 

Goodwill

 

9,006

 

9,006

 

Other assets

 

1,474

 

1,023

 

Total assets

 

$

40,101

 

$

57,118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term debt

 

$

405

 

$

325

 

Accounts payable

 

1,317

 

1,216

 

Advance billing and payments

 

317

 

274

 

Accrued taxes

 

947

 

1,056

 

Pension and post retirement benefit obligations

 

276

 

276

 

Accrued wages

 

914

 

1,036

 

Deferred revenue

 

857

 

705

 

Other accrued expenses

 

2,792

 

2,180

 

Total current liabilities

 

7,825

 

7,068

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

403

 

295

 

Payable and deferred income taxes

 

1,008

 

766

 

Pension and postretirement benefit obligations

 

8,826

 

8,833

 

Total liabilities

 

18,062

 

16,962

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred shares - $100 par value, authorized and issued shares of 5; $0.01 par value, authorized and unissued shares of 10,000

 

500

 

500

 

Common stock - $0.01 par value, authorized shares of 10,000; issued shares of 6,903 and 6,826 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively

 

69

 

69

 

Treasury stock - at cost, 902 and 885 common shares at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively

 

(8,202

)

(8,077

)

Additional paid in capital

 

14,731

 

14,047

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(3,215

)

(3,997

)

Retained earnings

 

18,156

 

37,614

 

Total shareholders’ equity

 

22,039

 

40,156

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

40,101

 

$

57,118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please see accompanying notes, which are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

ALTEVA, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(3,838

)

$

29,958

 

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

3,383

 

2,753

 

Stock based compensation expense

 

684

 

677

 

Distribution in excess of equity in earnings and gain on sale from equity investment

 

 

(49,776

)

Other non-cash operating activities

 

(958

)

230

 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Trade accounts receivable

 

(182

)

(269

)

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

(1,204

)

(272

)

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

1,022

 

922

 

Accrued taxes

 

(109

)

4,029

 

Pension and postretirement benefit obligations

 

775

 

139

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

(427

)

(11,609

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

(688

)

(222

)

Purchase of seat licenses and other intangibles

 

(353

)

(115

)

Proceeds from sale of assets

 

 

33

 

Proceeds received in excess of income from equity investments

 

 

49,776

 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

(1,041

)

49,472

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from debt

 

 

2,443

 

Repayment of debt and capital leases

 

(363

)

(12,575

)

Purchase of treasury stock

 

(125

)

(399

)

Dividends (Common and Preferred)

 

(15,620

)

(19

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

 

(16,108

)

(10,550

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

 

(17,576

)

27,313

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

24,047

 

1,636

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

6,471

 

$

28,949

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of equipment and seat licenses under capital leases

 

$

368

 

$

390

 

Seat licenses acquired but not paid

 

$

 

$

188

 

 

Please see the accompanying notes, which are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

ALTEVA, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 1:   NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

 

Nature of Operations

 

Alteva, Inc. (“Alteva” or the “Company”) is a cloud-based communications company that provides Unified Communications (“UC”) solutions, including enterprise hosted Voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) and operates as a regional Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier (“ILEC”) in southern Orange County, New York and northern New Jersey.  Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires, all references to the Company means the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.  The Company delivers cloud-based UC solutions including BroadSoft-based VoIP integrated with Microsoft Lync, Microsoft Exchange, Google Apps for Business, leading customer relationship management (“CRM”) applications such as Salesforce.com and Bring-Your-Own-Device (“BYOD”) solutions for Mobility, which allows users to take advantage of all of the features available to them no matter where they are located or what device they are using.  The Company’s ILEC operations consist of providing local and toll telephone service to residential and business customers, Internet high-speed broadband service, and satellite television services provided by DIRECTV®.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, with the instructions to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  The operating results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year or any other future period.  The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.  All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.  The interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period.  Significant estimates include, but are not limited to, depreciation and amortization expense, allowance for doubtful accounts, long-lived assets, pension and postretirement expenses, and income taxes.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

The Company derives its revenue from the sale of UC services as well as traditional telephone services.

 

The Company recognizes revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement between the Company and the customer exists, (ii) the delivery of the product to the customer has occurred or service has been provided to the customer, (iii) the price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability of the sales or service price is reasonably assured.  Revenue is reported net of all applicable sales tax.

 

UC

 

The Company’s UC services and solutions consist primarily of its hosted VoIP UC system, certain UC applications, and other professional services associated with the installation and activation. Additionally, the Company offers customers the ability to purchase telephone equipment from the Company directly or independently from external vendors.

 

Multiple element arrangements primarily include the sale of telephone equipment, along with professional services associated with installation, activation and implementation services, as well as follow on hosting services.  The Company has concluded that the separate units of accounting in these arrangements consist of (i) the telephone equipment sale and (ii) the professional services provided combined with the follow on hosting services.  The professional services provided do not constitute a separate unit of accounting as they do not have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis.  Arrangement consideration is allocated to the separate units of accounting based on the relative selling price.  The selling price for telephone equipment is based on third-party evidence representing list prices for similar equipment when sold a stand-alone basis.  The selling price for professional and hosting services is based on the Company’s best estimate of selling price (“BESP”).  The Company develops its BESP by considering pricing practices, margin, competition and overall market trends.

 

7



Table of Contents

 

The Company bills a portion of its monthly recurring hosted service revenue a month in advance. Any amounts billed and collected, but for which the service is not yet delivered, are included in deferred revenue. These amounts are recognized as revenues only when the service is delivered.

 

Equipment sales associated with the sale of telephone equipment is recognized upon delivery to the customer, as it is considered to be a separate earnings process. The sales are recognized on a gross basis, as the Company is considered the primary obligor in customer transactions among other considerations.  Other upfront fees, excluding equipment, along with associated costs, up to but not exceeding these fees, are deferred and recognized over the estimated life of the customer relationship.  The Company has estimated its customer relationship life at eight years and evaluates it periodically for continued appropriateness.

 

Telephone

 

Revenue is earned from monthly billings to customers for local voice services, long distance, DSL, Internet services, hardware and other services. Revenue is also derived from charges for network access to the local exchange telephone network from subscriber line charges and from contractual arrangements for services such as billing and collection and directory advertising. Revenue is recognized in the period in which service is provided to the customer. Directory advertising revenue is recorded ratably over the life of the directory. With multiple billing cycles, the Company accrues revenue earned but not yet billed at the end of a quarter. The Company also defers services billed in advance and recognizes them as income when earned.

 

The Telephone segment markets competitive service bundles which may include multiple deliverables. The base bundles consist of voice services (including a business or residential phone line), calling features and long distance services and customers may choose to add internet services to a base bundle package. Separate units of accounting within the bundled packages include voice services, long distance and Internet services. Revenue for all services included in bundles is recognized over the same service period, which is the time period in which the service is provided to the customer.

 

Certain revenue is realized under pooling arrangements with other service providers and is divided among the companies based on respective costs and investments to provide the services. The companies that take part in pooling arrangements may adjust their costs and investments for a period of two years, which causes the funds distributed by the pool to be adjusted retroactively. The Company believes that recorded amounts represent reasonable estimates of the final distribution from these pools. However, to the extent that the companies participating in these pools make adjustments, there will be corresponding adjustments to the Company’s recorded revenue in future periods.

 

Revenue from these pooling arrangements which includes Universal Service Funds (“USF”) and National Exchange Carrier Association (“NECA”) pool settlements, accounted for 5% and 3% of the Company’s consolidated revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

 

Materials and Supplies

 

The Company’s materials and supplies are carried at average cost, net of reserves for obsolescence, and consist principally of telephone equipment, telephone pole and wiring spare parts and other ancillary equipment for resale.

 

Fair Value

 

Fair value is the estimated price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company is required by accounting standards to provide the disclosure framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosure about fair value measurements.  Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:

 

Level 1:

Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. The Company considers active markets as those in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

 

 

Level 2:

These are inputs, other than quoted prices that are included in Level 1, which are observable in the marketplace throughout the term of the assets or liabilities, can be derived from observable data, or supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.

 

 

Level 3:

Measured based on prices or valuation models that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and less observable from objective sources (i.e. supported by little or no market activity). The Company does not have sufficient corroborating evidence to support classifying these assets and liabilities as Level 1 or Level 2.

 

Financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

 

8



Table of Contents

 

Goodwill

 

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired business over the net fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.  Goodwill is not amortized, but rather is assessed for impairment at least annually.  The Company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level annually on December 31, or whenever events or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value.  If it is determined that an impairment has occurred, the Company records a write down of the carrying value and records the charge for the impairment as an operating expense during the period in which the determination is made.  The Company has determined that its operating segments are the applicable reporting units because they are the lowest level at which discrete, reliable financial and cash flow information is regularly reviewed by segment management.

 

The Company only has goodwill that is associated with its UC segment, resulting from the purchase of certain assets and certain liabilities of Alteva, LLC in 2011.  The Company is not aware of any events or circumstances that occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 that would have more likely than not reduced the fair value of this reporting unit below its carrying value.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company records deferred taxes that arise from temporary differences between the financial statement and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.  Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of the assets and liabilities to which they relate.  Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are adjusted for the effect of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.  The Company’s deferred taxes result principally from differences in the timing of depreciation, in the accounting for pensions and other postretirement benefits, and state net operating loss carryforwards.

 

The process of providing for income taxes and determining the related balance sheet accounts requires management to assess uncertainties, make judgments regarding outcomes and utilize estimates. Management must make judgments currently about such uncertainties and determine estimates of the Company’s tax assets and liabilities. To the extent the final outcome differs, future adjustments to the Company’s tax assets and liabilities may be necessary.

 

The Company assesses the realizability of its deferred tax assets, taking into consideration future reversals of existing temporary differences, the Company’s forecast of future taxable income, and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the deferred tax assets. Based on this assessment, management must evaluate the need for, and the amount of, valuation allowances against the Company’s deferred tax assets. To the extent facts and circumstances change in the future, adjustments to the valuation allowances may be required.

 

Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes requires uncertain tax positions to be classified as non-current income tax liabilities unless they are expected to be paid within one year.  The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for the award of an equity instrument based on the grant-date fair value of the award, with such cost recognized over the applicable vesting period.

 

Accounting Policies

 

There were no material changes to the Company’s other accounting policies as presented in Item 8 of its Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

NOTE 2:  NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

 

In May 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued accounting standards update (“ASU”) 2015-07, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent), followed in July by ASU 2015-12, Plan Accounting: Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Topic 960), Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962), and Health and Welfare Benefit Plans (Topic 965): Part (I) Fully Benefit-Responsive Investment Contracts, Part (II) Plan Investment Disclosures, Part (III) Measurement Date Practical Expedient. These ASUs simplify or eliminate some of the financial statement reporting and disclosures that were previously required for employee benefit plans. ASU 2015-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years and requires retrospective presentation.  Parts I and II of ASU 2015-12 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and require retrospective presentation.  The Company expects the adoption of these standards will affect its employee benefit plan disclosures.

 

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.  The update provides guidance on simplifying the presentation for debt issuance costs and debt discount and premium. The standard is effective for the annual and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015.  The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-03 to have a significant impact to the disclosure or balance sheet presentation in its consolidated financial statements.

 

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern: Disclosure of

 

9



Table of Contents

 

Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.  The update provides guidance that previously did not exist under US GAAP about a company’s management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures, if applicable.  The standard is effective for annual and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016.  Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-15 to have a significant impact to the disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period.  The update provides guidance on how to account for certain share-based payment awards where employees would be eligible to vest in the award regardless of whether the employee is still rendering service on the date the performance target is achieved.  The standard is effective for annual and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015.  Early adoption is permitted.  The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-12 to have a material impact to its consolidated results of operations.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606 to supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP.  The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services.  ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, it is possible more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than required under existing U.S. GAAP.  The guidance was originally effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, which defers the effective date to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. ASU 2014-09 can be adopted using either of two methods: (i) retrospective to each prior reporting period presented with the option to elect certain practical expedients as defined within ASU 2014-09; or (ii) retrospective with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application and providing certain additional disclosures as defined per ASU 2014-09. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements and has not yet selected a transition method nor has it selected an adoption date.

 

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. ASU 2014-08 revised guidance to only allow disposals of components of an entity that represent a strategic shift (e.g., disposal of a major geographical area, a major line of business, a major equity method investment, or other major parts of an entity) and that have a major effect on a reporting entity’s operations and financial results to be reported as discontinued operations. The revised guidance also requires expanded disclosure in the financial statements for discontinued operations, as well as for disposals of significant components of an entity that do not qualify for discontinued operations presentation. ASU 2014-08 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014. The Company adopted ASU 2014-08 effective January 1, 2015 and the adoption did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statement presentation.

 

NOTE 3:  SEAT LICENSES AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual value. Identifiable intangible assets that are subject to amortization are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable.

 

The components of seat licenses are as follows:

 

 

 

Estimated

 

Gross

 

Accumulated

 

Net

 

($ in thousands)

 

Useful Lives

 

Value

 

Amortization

 

Value

 

As of September 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seat licenses

 

5 years

 

$

3,399

 

$

(1,862

)

$

1,537

 

 

 

 

Estimated

 

Gross

 

Accumulated

 

Net

 

($ in thousands)

 

Useful Lives

 

Value

 

Amortization

 

Value

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seat licenses

 

5 years

 

$

2,936

 

$

(1,393

)

$

1,543

 

 

10



Table of Contents

 

The components of other intangible assets are as follows:

 

 

 

Estimated

 

Gross

 

Accumulated

 

Net

 

($ in thousands)

 

Useful Lives

 

Value

 

Amortization

 

Value

 

As of September 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

8 years

 

$

5,400

 

$

(2,812

)

$

2,588

 

Trade name

 

15 years

 

2,400

 

(667

)

1,733

 

Website

 

12 years

 

95

 

(34

)

61

 

Total

 

 

 

$

7,895

 

$

(3,513

)

$

4,382

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated

 

Gross

 

Accumulated

 

Net

 

($ in thousands)

 

Useful Lives

 

Value

 

Amortization

 

Value

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

8 years

 

$

5,400

 

$

(2,306

)

$

3,094

 

Trade name

 

15 years

 

2,400

 

(547

)

1,853

 

Website

 

12 years

 

95

 

(22

)

73

 

Total

 

 

 

$

7,895

 

$

(2,875

)

$

5,020

 

 

NOTE 4:  ORANGE COUNTY-POUGHKEEPSIE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

 

The Company was a limited partner in the Orange County-Poughkeepsie Limited Partnership (“O-P”) and had an 8.108% limited partnership interest in the O-P until April 30, 2014, which was accounted for under the equity method of accounting.  The majority owner and general partner of the O-P is Verizon Wireless of the East LP (“Verizon”).

 

On April 30, 2014, the Company exercised the Put option and sold all of its ownership interest in the O-P for gross proceeds of $50 million, which resulted in a gain on the sale of $49.8 million.  The Company did not receive any income from the O-P after April 30, 2014.  The Company used a portion of the proceeds to repay all of the then outstanding borrowings under the TriState credit facility, paid taxes on the gain and fund a special dividend paid in this quarter. The Company expects to use the remaining gross proceeds, among other things, for working capital needs and support growth initiatives. The Company may, in its discretion, use the gross proceeds for other purposes.

 

Pursuant to the equity method accounting of the Company’s investment income, the Company is required to record the income from the O-P as an increase to the Company’s investment account.  On May 26, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement (the “4G Agreement”) with Verizon and Cellco Partnership (d/b/a Verizon Wireless), the other limited partner, in the O-P to make certain changes to the O-P partnership agreement.  The 4G Agreement provided for guaranteed annual cash distributions to the Company through 2013.  The Company was therefore required to apply the cash payments made as a return on its investment when received.   As a result of receiving the fixed guaranteed cash distributions from the O-P in excess of the Company’s proportionate share of the O-P income, the investment account was reduced to zero during 2012. Thereafter, the Company recorded the fixed guaranteed cash distributions that were received from the O-P in excess of the proportionate share of the O-P income directly to the Company’s statement of operations as other income.  In 2014 when the guaranteed distribution ceased, the Company returned to recording the income from the O-P as in increase to the Company’s investment account and any cash payments received were applied as a return on its investment.  As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the investment account was zero.

 

The following summarizes the income statement (unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2014:

 

11



Table of Contents

 

 

 

For the nine months
ended

 

($ in thousands)

 

September 30, 2014

 

Net sales

 

$

170,746

 

Cellular service cost

 

80,051

 

Operating expenses

 

44,726

 

Operating income

 

45,969

 

Other income

 

62

 

Net income

 

$

46,031

 

Company’s share

 

$

2,597

 

 

NOTE 5: DEBT OBLIGATIONS

 

Debt obligations consisted of the following at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

 

 

 

As of

 

($ in thousands)

 

September 30, 2015

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term debt:

 

 

 

 

 

Capital leases and other borrowings, current portion

 

$

405

 

$

325

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt:

 

 

 

 

 

Capital leases and other borrowings

 

403

 

295

 

Total debt obligations

 

$

808

 

$

620

 

 

On November 7, 2014, the Company entered into a demand line of credit with TriState (the “Demand Line of Credit”) to allow for borrowings up to $5.0 million. The Company borrows or repays its debt as needed based upon its working capital obligations.  It is up to the discretion of TriState to approve borrowings within the allowed line of credit limit and TriState may, at any time, demand that the Company make payment on an outstanding balance. There are no financial covenants under the Demand Line of Credit.  As of September 30, 2015, the Company did not have any outstanding balance under the Demand Line of Credit.

 

NOTE 6:  INCOME TAXES

 

The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, and September 30, 2014 was 16% and 36%, respectively.  We determined our interim tax provision by developing an estimate of the annual effective tax rate and applying such rate to interim pre-tax results. The estimated rate includes projections of tax expense on the expected increase in our valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.  The estimated effective tax rate differed from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to the expected increase in the valuation allowance, which reduced the overall tax benefit recorded for the period ended September 30, 2015.

 

As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company carried a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets because management determined that it was not more likely than not that it would realize the benefits of such deferred tax assets. The Company maintains a deferred tax liability related to indefinite lived intangibles.

 

Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes requires uncertain tax positions to be classified as non-current income tax liabilities unless they are expected to be paid within one year.  The Company has concluded that there are no material uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in its consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the interest expense relating to unrecognized tax benefits was not material.

 

The Company and its subsidiaries file a U.S. federal consolidated income tax return.  The U.S. federal statute of limitations remains open for the years 2011 and thereafter. State income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of 3 to 5 years after filing the respective return.  The impact of any federal changes on state returns remains subject to examination by the relevant states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states.

 

12



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 7:  PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

 

The components of net periodic cost (benefit) for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:

 

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

Postretirement Benefits

 

 

 

For the three months ended

 

For the three months ended

 

($ in thousands)

 

September 30, 2015

 

September 30, 2014

 

September 30, 2015

 

September 30, 2014

 

Interest cost

 

$

195

 

$

191

 

$

24

 

$

30

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

(195

)

(228

)

7

 

(6

)

Amortization of prior service cost

 

14

 

14

 

(11

)

(49

)

Recognized actuarial loss

 

237

 

142

 

21

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost (benefit)

 

$

251

 

$

119

 

$

41

 

$

(19

)

 

The components of net periodic cost (benefit) for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:

 

 

 

Pension Benefits

 

Postretirement Benefits

 

 

 

For the nine months ended

 

For the nine months ended

 

($ in thousands)

 

September 30, 2015

 

September 30, 2014

 

September 30, 2015

 

September 30, 2014

 

Interest cost

 

$

586

 

$

604

 

$

73

 

$

89

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

(586

)

(669

)

21

 

(15

)

Amortization of prior service cost

 

42

 

42

 

(34

)

(147

)

Recognized actuarial loss

 

711

 

497

 

63

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost (benefit)

 

$

753

 

$

474

 

$

123

 

$

(55

)

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, the Company has contributed $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, to its pension and postretirement benefits plans. The amortization of prior service cost and recognized actuarial loss included in pension and postretirement expense represent reclassifications out of other comprehensive income (loss).

 

NOTE 8:    STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

 

The Company has a shareholder approved long-term incentive plan (the “LTIP”) to assist the Company and its affiliates in attracting, motivating and retaining selected individuals to serve as employees, directors, consultants and advisors of the Company and its affiliates by providing incentives to such individuals through the ownership and performance of the Company’s common stock. There are 1.1 million shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the LTIP.  Shares available for grant under the LTIP may be authorized and unissued shares or shares that have been reacquired by the Company and are designated as treasury shares. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, 382,198 and 420,392 shares of the Company’s common stock were available for grant under the LTIP. The LTIP permits the issuance by the Company of awards in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance shares. The exercise price per share of the Company’s common stock purchasable under any stock option or stock appreciation right may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of one share of common stock on the date of grant. The term of any stock option or stock appreciation right may not exceed ten years. The LTIP also provides plan participants with a cashless mechanism to exercise their stock options. Issued restricted stock, stock options and restricted stock units are subject to vesting restrictions.

 

On August 21, 2015, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”) approved amendments to the vesting terms of unvested equity grants for all employees with outstanding grants under the LTIP.  All existing employee equity grant award agreements were amended to provide that all such awards vest immediately upon a change in control of the Company. On the same day, the Committee took further action so that all awarded, but unvested restricted stock of non-employee directors vested effective as of the close of business on Monday, August 24, 2015. As a result of these two changes, the Company recorded an additional $0.2 million in compensation expense during the third quarter of 2015 relating to the accelerated vesting for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.

 

Restricted Stock Awards

 

Stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock awards was $0.7 million and $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and was recorded within selling, general, and administrative expenses.

 

13



Table of Contents

 

Restricted stock awards are amortized over their respective vesting periods of two or three years.  The Company records stock-based compensation for grants of restricted stock awards on a straight-line basis.

 

The following table summarizes the restricted common stock activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2015:

 

 

 

For the nine months ended

 

 

 

September 30, 2015

 

 

 

Shares

 

Weighted
Average Fair
Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance - nonvested at December 31, 2014

 

124,578

 

$

9.84

 

Granted

 

80,452

 

7.37

 

Vested

 

(91,262

)

9.27

 

Forfeited

 

(3,365

)

9.94

 

Balance - nonvested at September 30, 2015

 

110,403

 

$

8.52

 

 

The total grant-date fair value of restricted stock vested for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $0.8 million.  As of September 30, 2015, $0.6 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted common stock is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.0 years.

 

Stock Options

 

The following tables summarize stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, along with stock options exercisable at the end of the period:

 

 

 

For the nine months ended

 

 

 

September 30, 2015

 

Options

 

Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price

 

Weighted
Average
Contractual
Life (Years)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding - Beginning of period

 

327,003

 

$

12.18

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired

 

(22,655

)

11.02

 

 

 

Outstanding - End of period

 

304,348

 

$

12.26

 

6.11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested and Expected to Vest at September 30, 2015

 

295,218

 

 

 

 

 

Exercisable at September 30, 2015

 

260,555

 

 

 

 

 

 

The fair value of the stock-based awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes model.  No options were granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

 

As of September 30, 2015, the amount of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options awards was de minimis.

 

Stock-based compensation expense resulting from stock options granted to employees was de minimis for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 and was recorded within selling, general, and administrative expenses.

 

Shareholder Rights Plan

 

On September 2, 2014, in connection with an unsolicited, non-binding acquisition proposal, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Alteva Board”) adopted a Stockholder Rights Plan that provides for the distribution of one right for each share of common stock outstanding.  Each right entitles the holder to purchase one one-thousandth (1/1000th) of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value of $0.01 per share, of the Company (the “Preferred Stock”) at a price of $22.20 per one-thousandth of a share of Preferred Stock, subject to adjustment.  The rights generally become distributed and exercisable at the discretion of the Alteva Board following a public announcement that 20% or more of the Company’s common stock has been acquired or an intent to acquire has become apparent.  By its terms, the Stockholder Rights Plan expired on September 1, 2015.

 

Share Repurchase Program

 

On August 25, 2014, the Alteva Board authorized a repurchase program for up to $3.0 million of its common stock.  Share purchases may take place in open market transactions or in privately negotiated transaction and may be made from time to time depending on market conditions, share price, trading volume and other factors. The repurchase program authorized by the Alteva Board does not require the Company to acquire a specific number of shares, and may be terminated, suspended, or

 

14



Table of Contents

 

modified at any time. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased, if any, will depend on a variety of factors including the market price of the Company’s common stock, regulatory, legal and contractual requirements, and other market factors. The share repurchase is expected to be funded from available cash on hand.

 

On May 14, 2015, the stock repurchase program was terminated by the Company’s Board of Directors in connection with approving the special cash dividend of $2.60 per outstanding common share (see Note 10).

 

As of September 30, 2015, the Company repurchased 11,057 shares under the repurchase program at a value of $0.1 million.  Shares were purchased on the open market at the prevailing days’ stock price, plus transaction costs.

 

NOTE 9:  EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of shares of common stock adjusted to include the effect of potentially dilutive securities.  Potentially dilutive securities include incremental shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options and shares of unvested restricted stock.  Diluted earnings (loss) per share exclude all dilutive securities if their effect is anti-dilutive.

 

The Company’s restricted stock awards are considered “participating securities” because they contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends. Under the two-class method, earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing earnings allocated to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. In applying the two-class method, earnings are allocated to both shares of common stock and participating securities based on their respective weighted-average shares outstanding for the period.

 

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company experienced a net loss.  As a result, the effect of participating securities was excluded from the computation of basic and diluted EPS.  The net losses were not allocated because the restricted stockholders are not required to fund losses.

 

The weighted average number of shares of common stock used in basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was as follows:

 

 

 

For the three months ended September 30,

 

(amounts in thousands, except for per share)

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NUMERATOR:

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss applicable to common stock before participating securities

 

$

(1,824

)

$

(1,336

)

Less: income applicable to participating securities (1)

 

 

 

Net loss applicable to common stock

 

$

(1,824

)

$

(1,336

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

DENOMINATOR:

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic and Diluted (2)

 

5,871

 

5,826

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPS:

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss per share - Basic and Diluted

 

$

(0.31

)

$

(0.23

)

 


(1)         For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company had 0.1 million and 0.2 million, respectively in nonvested participating securities.  As the participating securities do not participate in losses, there was no allocation of loss for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

 

(2)         For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, potentially dilutive shares related to out of the money common stock options that were excluded from EPS, as their effect was anti-dilutive, were nominal.

 

 

 

For the nine months ended September 30,

 

(amounts in thousands, except for per share)

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NUMERATOR:

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income applicable to common stock before participating securities

 

$

(3,857

)

$

29,939

 

Less: income applicable to participating securities (1)

 

 

(1,174

)

Net (loss) income applicable to common stock

 

$

(3,857

)

$

28,765

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DENOMINATOR:

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic and Diluted (2)

 

5,853

 

5,802

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPS:

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income per share - Basic and Diluted

 

$

(0.66

)

$

4.96

 

 

15



Table of Contents

 


(1)         For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company had 0.1 million and 0.2 million, respectively in nonvested participating securities.  As the participating securities do not participate in losses, there was no allocation of loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

 

(2)         For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, potentially dilutive shares related to out of the money common stock options that were excluded from EPS, as their effect was anti-dilutive, were nominal.

 

NOTE 10:  SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

A summary of the changes to shareholders’ equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 is provided below:

 

 

 

For the nine months ended September 30,

 

($ in thousands)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Shareholders’ equity, beginning of period

 

$

40,156

 

$

13,006

 

Net (loss) income

 

(3,838

)

29,958

 

Dividends paid on common stock

 

(15,601

)

 

Dividends paid on preferred stock

 

(19

)

(19

)

Stock based compensation

 

684

 

677

 

Treasury stock purchases

 

(125

)

(399

)

Changes in pension and postretirement benefit plans

 

782

 

410

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity, end of period

 

$

22,039

 

$

43,633

 

 

Special Cash Dividend

 

On May 14, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized and declared a special cash dividend of $2.60 on each common share.

 

The record date for the special cash dividend was June 19, 2015, and the payment date for the dividend was June 30, 2015. At $2.60 per share, the special cash dividend represented approximately 36.0% of the Company’s closing stock price on May 14, 2015. Pursuant to NYSE MKT policy, when a dividend is declared in a per share amount that exceeds 20% of a company’s stock price, the date on which that company’s shares will begin to trade without the dividend, or ex-dividend, is the first business day following the payable date. The ex-dividend date as set by NYSE MKT was July 1, 2015, the first business day following the payable date for the special cash dividend. Shareholders of record on the record date who sold their shares of the Company’s common stock prior to July 1, 2015 were required by the NYSE MKT to give the purchaser of those shares of the Company’s common stock a due bill, covering the amount of the dividend, to be redeemed on the date fixed by the NYSE MKT.

 

NOTE 11:  SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

The Company’s two segments, UC and Telephone, are strategic business units that offer different products and services.  The Company evaluates the performance of its two segments based upon factors such as revenue growth, expense containment, market share and operating results.

 

The UC segment is a premier provider of hosted Unified Communications as a Service (UCaaS) including VoIP, hosted Microsoft communication services, fixed mobile convergence and advanced voice applications for a broad customer base including, medium and large-sized businesses and enterprise business customers.

 

The Telephone segment operates as an ILEC in southern Orange County, New York and northern New Jersey.  The Telephone segment consists of providing local and toll telephone service, high-speed broadband and fiber Internet access services and satellite video services to residential and business customers.  The ILEC service areas are primarily rural and have an estimated population of 50,000.  We also operate as a CLEC in Middletown, New York, Scotchtown, New York and Vernon, New Jersey.

 

The segment results presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations these segments would have achieved had they operated as stand-alone entities during the periods presented.  All intersegment transactions are shown net of eliminations.

 

Segment statement of operations information for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 is set forth below:

 

16



Table of Contents

 

 

 

For the three months ended September 30,

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

UC

 

Telephone

 

Consolidated

 

UC

 

Telephone

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Revenues

 

$

4,718

 

$

3,252

 

$

7,970

 

$

4,308

 

$

3,263

 

$

7,571

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of services and products

 

2,268

 

933

 

3,201

 

1,923

 

1,001

 

2,924

 

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

3,624

 

2,391

 

6,015

 

3,048

 

1,678

 

4,726

 

Loss on disposal, restructuring costs and other special charges

 

 

 

 

336

 

264

 

600

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

529

 

362

 

891

 

546

 

385

 

931

 

Total Operating Expenses

 

6,421

 

3,686

 

10,107

 

5,853

 

3,328

 

9,181

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Loss

 

(1,703

)

(434

)

(2,137

)

(1,545

)

(65

)

(1,610

)

Interest income (expense), net

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

20

 

Other income (expense), net

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

Loss before income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

$

(2,114

)

 

 

 

 

$

(1,594

)

 

Segment statement of operations information for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 is set forth below:

 

 

 

For the nine months ended September 30,

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

UC

 

Telephone

 

Consolidated

 

UC

 

Telephone

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Revenues

 

$

13,703

 

$

9,915

 

$

23,618

 

$

12,753

 

$

9,946

 

$

22,699

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of services and products

 

6,769

 

2,918

 

9,687

 

5,838

 

3,005

 

8,843

 

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

10,361

 

6,303

 

16,664

 

10,059

 

5,627

 

15,686

 

Loss on disposal, restructuring costs and other special charges

 

 

 

 

392

 

308

 

700

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

2,256

 

1,127

 

3,383

 

1,606

 

1,147

 

2,753

 

Total Operating Expenses

 

19,386

 

10,348

 

29,734

 

17,895

 

10,087

 

27,982

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Loss

 

(5,683

)

(433

)

(6,116

)

(5,142

)

(141

)

(5,283

)

Interest income (expense), net

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

(173

)

Income from investment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52,373

 

Other income, net

 

 

 

 

 

1,515

 

 

 

 

 

23

 

(Loss) Income before income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

$

(4,591

)

 

 

 

 

$

46,940

 

 

The assets for the UC segment decreased during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 primarily as a result of accelerated depreciation/amortization of office equipment and leasehold improvements associated with the exit of the office lease (see Note 13).

 

NOTE 12:    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

The Company is party, from time to time, to various legal proceedings, including patent infringement claims, regulatory investigations and tax examinations incidental to its business.  The Company continually monitors these legal proceedings, regulatory investigations and tax examinations to determine the impact and any required accruals.

 

On March 31, 2014, David J. Cuthbert was terminated as President and Chief Executive Officer of Alteva.  The Company notified Mr. Cuthbert that his termination was for “cause” and, as such, Mr. Cuthbert was not entitled to any of the benefits provided for under his employment agreement dated March 5, 2013, including cash severance and the acceleration of vesting on any unvested equity instruments.  Mr. Cuthbert disputed the Company’s basis for termination and claimed that he was due his full severance benefits.  As the Company did not want to incur further legal fees or the risk of distraction of a protracted legal dispute, on October 16, 2014, the Company, through mediation, entered into a settlement agreement and mutual release agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Mr. Cuthbert.  In consideration for Mr. Cuthbert’s execution of the Settlement Agreement, the Company agreed to pay to Mr. Cuthbert the amount of $0.75 million less certain taxes and withholdings, which was accrued for and reported in the statement of operations under restructuring costs and other special charges, less insurance proceeds, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.  The settlement agreement was paid out on October 28, 2014.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company was named as a party to a lawsuit from Sprint regarding a certain tariff charge (IntraMTA carrier charge) billed by Alteva, paid by Sprint over a number of years that had not previously been disputed. Sprint has filed similar lawsuits against other carriers related to the same tariff charges. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss.  The amount of the claim filed by Sprint is for $0.2 million; however the Company has not been able to substantiate the basis for the claim amount and therefore, has not recorded an accrual as of September 30, 2015.

 

NOTE 13:    OFFICE RELOCATION

 

In February 2015, the Company entered into an agreement to terminate the lease for its corporate headquarters in Philadelphia, PA.  As part of this agreement, the Company was entitled to receive a payment of $1.5 million as long as the Company vacated the facility by May 18, 2015.  The Company vacated the facility on May 17, 2015 and received payment on June 22, 2015.  In connection with the lease termination, the Company has recognized other income of $1.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 in the statement of operations.  The Company depreciated the remaining net book value of the leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures associated with the old headquarters, and recognize the remaining deferred rent liability through the move date of May 17, 2015. The statement of operations includes accelerated depreciation of zero and $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 reported in depreciation and amortization, respectively, as well as accelerated deferred rent of zero and $0.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, reported in selling, general and administrative expenses in the UC Segment, respectively.

 

17



Table of Contents

 

In connection with the lease termination, the Company entered into a lease for a new corporate headquarters in Philadelphia, PA dated February 27, 2015.  The terms of the lease are for 10 full years with minimum rental payments of $0.4 million for the first full twelve month period, escalating by 2.5% each year thereafter.  The first full twelve month period began on June 1, 2015 since the Company began operating from the new location on May 18, 2015.  Per the agreement, the Company paid a per diem rate from the date it begins operating from the new location until the first day of the first full month.

 

NOTE 14:  MERGER AGREEMENT

 

On September 2, 2015, the Company, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with MBS Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and Arrow Merger Subsidiary, Inc., a New York corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent.

 

At the time that the Merger becomes effective (the “Effective Time”), (i) each issued and outstanding common share of the Company, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), other than certain excluded shares, will be converted automatically into the right to receive $4.70 in cash (the “Common Stock Merger Consideration”), and (ii) each issued and outstanding 5% Series Preferred Share of the Company, par value $100 per share, will be converted automatically into the right to receive $100 all in cash, plus any accrued but unpaid dividends through the Closing Date (as defined in the Merger Agreement).

 

Completion of the Merger is subject to various closing conditions, including, among others, (a) the affirmative vote of at least seventy percent (70%) of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at a special shareholders meeting (“Shareholders’ Meeting”) in favor of adopting the Merger Agreement and approving the Merger, (b) the receipt of required regulatory approvals and consents, and (c) the absence of any law, injunction, judgment, order, decree or ruling restraining or prohibiting consummation of the Merger.  Each party’s obligation to consummate the Merger is also subject to certain additional conditions, which include the accuracy of the other party’s representations and warranties and the other party’s compliance with its covenants and obligations in all material respects (in each case, as contained in the Merger Agreement).

 

Shareholders of the Company have been asked to vote on the adoption of the Merger Agreement and the approval of the Merger at the Shareholders’ Meeting that is currently scheduled for November 16, 2015.

 

For the nine months ended, the Company incurred $0.9 million of costs associated with the pending Merger.  These costs are presented in selling, general and administrative expenses in the statements of operations.

 

If the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement is not approved by the Shareholders, or if the Merger is not consummated for any other reason, under specified circumstances, Alteva will be required to pay Parent (a) a termination fee of $873,000, or (b) the lesser of $750,000 and Parent’s documented out-of-pocket transaction fees and expenses actually incurred in connection with the transactions contemplated in the Merger Agreement.

 

NOTE 15:    SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

On October 8, 2015, Missy Hogan and Jennifer Geiger, as Trustees for the Janice Lynn Livingston Special Needs Trust U/A 2/17/11 (the “Plaintiff”), filed a suit in New York state court against Alteva, Alteva’s Board of Directors (Kelly C. Bloss, Brian J. Kelley, Jeffrey D. Alario, Douglas B. Benedict, and Edward J. Morea, together with Alteva, Inc. “Alteva Defendants”), MBS Holdings, Inc. and Arrow Merger Subsidiary, Inc.  Plaintiff has requested that the court certify the suit as a class action, but the court has not ruled on the request.  In the lawsuit, Plaintiff alleges that Alteva Defendants have breached their fiduciary duties to the public shareholders of Alteva by, among other things, failing to take reasonable steps to obtain and/or ensure that the public shareholders receive adequate and fair value for their shares in the proposed transaction.  Plaintiff also alleges that MBS Holdings, Inc. and Arrow Merger Subsidiary, Inc. aided and abetted Alteva Defendants in breaching their fiduciary duties to the public shareholders of Alteva.

 

In addition, in a filing dated October 13, 2015, Plaintiff requested that the court issue an order restraining the November 16, 2015 vote.  On October 19, 2015, the court denied Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief, but ordered expedited discovery and a hearing on November 12, 2015 concerning whether a preliminary injunction should be issued enjoining the November 16, 2015 vote.

 

At the November 12, 2015 hearing, the court denied Plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction.  The underlying case remains pending in New York state court.

 

18



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, statements containing the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “expects” and words of similar import, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following: general economic and business conditions, both nationally and in the geographic regions in which we operate; industry capacity; goodwill and long-lived asset impairment; demographic changes; management turnover; technological changes and changes in consumer demand; existing governmental regulations and changes in or our failure to comply with, governmental regulations; legislative proposals relating to the businesses in which we operate; changes to the USF; elimination of subsidies; risks associated with our unfunded pension liability; competition; the loss of any significant ability to attract and retain highly skilled personnel and any other factors that are described in “Risk Factors.” Given these uncertainties, current and prospective investors should be cautioned regarding reliance on such forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we disclaim any obligation to update any such factors or to publicly announce the results of any revision to any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect future events or developments. For a further discussion of the matters described above, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors” herein and Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

Overview

 

Alteva, Inc. (we, our or us) is a cloud-based communications company that provides Unified Communication (“UC”) solutions, including enterprise hosted VoIP and we operate a regional Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier (“ILEC”) in southern Orange County, New York and northern New Jersey. Our UC segment delivers cloud-based UC solutions including BroadSoft-based VoIP integrated with Microsoft Lync, Microsoft Exchange, Google Apps for Business, leading customer relationship management (“CRM”) applications such as Salesforce.com and Bring-Your-Own-Device (BYOD) solutions for Mobility, which allows users to take advantage of all of the features available to them no matter where they are located or what device they are using.  Our Telephone segment consists of our ILEC operations that provide local and toll telephone service to residential and business customers, internet high-speed broadband service, and DIRECTV. Our cloud-based Unified Communication as a Service (“UCaaS”) solutions are focused on medium, large and enterprise markets, which are defined as 20-1,000 users per location. We meet our customers’ unique needs for a business communications solution that integrates multi-location, mobility, business productivity and analytics, into a single seamless experience.

 

This discussion and analysis provides information about the important aspects of our operations and investments, both at the consolidated and segment levels, and includes discussions of our results of operations, financial position and sources and uses of cash.

 

This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

Executive Summary

 

 

 

Nine months ended September 30, 2015

 

Nine months ended September 30, 2014

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

% of Total

 

Operating

 

Operating

 

 

 

% of Total

 

Operating

 

Operating

 

 

 

Operating

 

($ in thousands)

 

Revenue

 

Revenue

 

Loss

 

Margin

 

Revenue

 

Revenue

 

Loss

 

Margin

 

Revenue

 

Loss

 

UC

 

$

13,703

 

58

%

$

(5,683

)

(41

)%

$

12,753

 

56

%

$

(5,142

)

(40

)%

$

950

 

$

(541

)

Telephone

 

9,915

 

42

%

(433

)

(4

)%

9,946

 

44

%

(141

)

(1

)%

(31

)

(292

)

Total

 

$

23,618

 

100

%

$

(6,116

)

(26

)%

$

22,699

 

100

%

$

(5,283

)

(23

)%

$

919

 

$

(833

)

 

Revenues increased 4% to $23.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, in comparison to $22.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.  The increase is primarily due to our UC license and usage revenues.  As of September 30, 2015, there were over 57,000 users on Alteva’s hosted platform, which represents an increase of 15% of the installed base compared September 30, 2014.   As of September 30, 2015, the Company had approximately 5,400 new users, or 9% of the installed base, sold and scheduled for implementation.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we had an operating loss of $6.1 million, compared to an operating loss of $5.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.  The increase in operating loss was attributable to higher depreciation expense incurred in connection with the acceleration of depreciation associated with leasehold improvements written off as a result of the Philadelphia, PA office move in May 2015, higher cost of services and products due to increased sales and higher selling, general and administrative expenses primarily due to professional fees and other costs associated with the review of strategic alternatives and entering into the Agreement and Plan of Merger with MBS Holdings, Inc.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we had a net loss of $3.8 million compared to net income of $29.9 million for the nine months ending September 30, 2014, which was primarily due to the gain on sale from the O-P investment in 2014. In 2015, we no longer have income from the O-P investment.

 

19



Table of Contents

 

Results of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

 

OPERATING REVENUES

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2015

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2014

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

% of Total

 

 

 

% of Total

 

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

Revenue

 

Revenue

 

Revenue

 

Revenue

 

Revenue

 

UC

 

$

4,718

 

59

%

$

4,308

 

57

%

$

410

 

Telephone

 

3,252

 

41

%

3,263

 

43

%

(11

)

Total

 

$

7,970

 

100

%

$

7,571

 

100

%

$

399

 

 

Revenues for our UC segment increased 10% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014.  This increase was primarily associated with a $0.3 million increase in license and usage revenue from the segment’s organic growth.  Revenues for our Telephone segment were flat for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014, due to decreases in access lines partially offset by higher pooling arrangements, access line rate increases and custom pole work.

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

% of Total

 

 

 

% of Total

 

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

Revenue

 

Revenue

 

Revenue

 

Revenue

 

Revenue

 

UC

 

$

13,703

 

58

%

$

12,753

 

56

%

$

950

 

Telephone

 

9,915

 

42

%

9,946

 

44

%

(31

)

Total

 

$

23,618

 

100

%

$

22,699

 

100

%

$

919

 

 

Revenues for our UC segment increased 8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014.  This increase was primarily associated with a $0.9 million increase in license and usage revenue from the segment’s organic growth.  Revenues for our Telephone segment were relatively flat for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014, due to decreases in access lines partially offset higher pooling arrangements, access line rate increases and custom pole work.

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

UC

 

Telephone

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

For the Three Month Ended September 30

 

 

 

For the Three Month Ended September 30

 

 

 

For the Three Month Ended September 30

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Change

 

2015

 

2014

 

Change

 

2015

 

2014

 

Change

 

Cost of services and products

 

$

2,268

 

$

1,923

 

$

345

 

$

933

 

$

1,001

 

$

(68

)

$

3,201

 

$

2,924

 

$

277

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

3,624

 

3,048

 

576

 

2,391

 

1,678

 

713

 

6,015

 

4,726

 

1,289

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

529

 

546

 

(17

)

362

 

385

 

(23

)

891

 

931

 

(40

)

Loss on disposal, restructuring costs and other special charges

 

 

336

 

(336

)

 

264

 

(264

)

 

600

 

(600

)

Total operating expenses

 

$

6,421

 

$

5,853

 

$

568

 

$

3,686

 

$

3,328

 

$

358

 

$

10,107

 

$

9,181

 

$

926

 

 

Total operating expenses increased 10% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 primarily due to selling, general and administrative expenses increasing 27% and cost of services and products increasing 10%.  The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily due to an increase in professional fees and other costs associated with the review of strategic alternatives and entering into the Agreement and Plan of Merger with MBS Holdings, Inc.  The increase in cost of services and products was primarily related to the variable costs associated with the additional seats on the platform and the hiring of additional operations personnel to support the implementation of new seats, including the growing implementation backlog.

 

20



Table of Contents

 

Cost of Services and Products

 

Cost of services and products for our UC segment increased 18% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014.  The increase in UC cost of services expenses was due to the variable costs associated with the additional seats on the platform and the hiring of additional operations personnel to support the implementation of new seats, including the growing implementation backlog.

 

Cost of services and products for our Telephone segment remained relatively flat for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 27% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014 primarily due to professional fees and other costs associated with the review of strategic alternatives and entering into the Agreement and Plan of Merger with MBS Holdings, Inc.

 

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

 

Depreciation and amortization expense remained relatively unchanged for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014.

 

Loss on Disposal, Restructuring Costs and Other Special Charges

 

We incurred $0.6 million charge in connection with the settlement with our former CEO for the three months ended September 30, 2014.

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

UC

 

Telephone

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

For the Nine Month Ended September 30

 

 

 

For the Nine Month Ended September 30

 

 

 

For the Nine Month Ended September 30

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Change

 

2015

 

2014

 

Change

 

2015

 

2014

 

Change

 

Cost of services and products

 

$

6,769

 

$

5,838

 

$

931

 

$

2,918

 

$

3,005

 

$

(87

)

$

9,687

 

$

8,843

 

$

844

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

10,361

 

10,059

 

302

 

6,303

 

5,627

 

676

 

16,664

 

15,686

 

978

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

2,256

 

1,606

 

650

 

1,127

 

1,147

 

(20

)

3,383

 

2,753

 

630

 

Loss on disposal, restructuring costs and other special charges

 

 

392

 

(392

)

 

308

 

(308

)

 

700

 

(700

)

Total operating expenses

 

$

19,386

 

$

17,895

 

$

1,491

 

$

10,348

 

$

10,087

 

$

261

 

$

29,734

 

$

27,982

 

$

1,752

 

 

Total operating expenses increased 6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 primarily due to depreciation and amortization increasing 23% and cost of services and products increasing 10%. The depreciation increase was due to the acceleration of depreciation associated with the Philadelphia, PA office move and the increase in cost of services and products was primarily related to the variable costs associated with the additional seats on the platform and the hiring of additional operations personnel to support the implementation of new seats, including the growing implementation backlog.

 

Cost of Services and Products

 

Cost of services and products for our UC segment increased 16% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014.  The increase in UC cost of services expenses was due to the variable costs associated with the additional seats on the platform and the hiring of additional operations personnel to support the implementation of new seats, including the growing implementation backlog. 

 

Cost of services and products for our Telephone segment remained relatively flat for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014 primarily due to professional fees and other costs associated with the review of strategic alternatives and entering into the Agreement and Plan of Merger with MBS Holdings, Inc.

 

21



Table of Contents

 

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

 

Depreciation and amortization expense in the UC segment increased 40% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014 primarily due to the accelerated depreciation of leasehold improvements to be written off in connection with the Philadelphia, PA office move (see Note 13).

 

Loss on Disposal, Restructuring Costs and Other Special Charges

 

We incurred $0.7 million charge in connection with the settlement with our former CEO for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

 

TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

For the Three Month Ended September 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Change

 

Interest income (expense), net

 

$

(2

)

$

20

 

$

(22

)

Income from investment

 

 

 

 

Other income, net

 

25

 

(4

)

29

 

Total other income

 

$

23

 

$

16

 

$

7

 

 

Total other income was insignificant and flat for the three months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to same period in 2014.

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

For the Nine Month Ended September 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Change

 

Interest income (expense), net

 

$

10

 

$

(173

)

$

183

 

Income from investment

 

 

52,373

 

(52,373

)

Other income, net

 

1,515

 

23

 

1,492

 

Total other income

 

$

1,525

 

$

52,223

 

$

(50,698

)

 

Total other income decreased 97% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to same period in 2014. The decrease was due to the gain on the sale of our ownership in the O-P partnership in 2014, offset by the gain on our lease termination in 2015 (see Note 13).

 

INCOME TAXES

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2015, we had an income tax benefit of $0.3 million, or 14% of loss before income taxes, as compared to an income tax benefit of $0.3 million, or 17% of loss before income taxes, for the three months ended September 30, 2014.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we had an income tax benefit of $0.8 million, or 16% of loss before income taxes, as compared to an income tax expense of $17.0 million, or 36% of income before income taxes, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.  The estimated effective tax rate for each period includes projections of tax expense on the expected change in our valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. The effective tax rate for the period ended September 30, 2015 is lower than the federal tax rate due to the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets reducing the overall tax benefit recorded.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the higher effective tax rate was due to the exercise of the Put being treated as a discrete item and was taxed at the full federal tax rate of 35%.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

We had $6.5 million of cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2015, as compared with $24.0 million at December 31, 2014.  We sold all of our ownership interest in the O-P on April 30, 2014 for gross proceeds of $50 million (see Note 4).  We did not receive any income from the O-P after April 30, 2014.  We used a portion of the proceeds to repay all of the outstanding borrowings under the TriState credit facility, pay taxes on the related gain and fund the special cash dividend paid in the second quarter of 2015.   We expect the remaining gross proceeds to be used to fund working capital needs.

 

On November 7, 2014, we entered into a new demand line of credit with TriState (the “Demand Line of Credit”) to allow for borrowings up to $5.0 million.  We borrow or repay our debt as needed based upon our working capital obligations.  It is up to the discretion of TriState to approve borrowings within the allowed line of credit limit and TriState may, at any time, demand that we make payment on an outstanding balance. As of September 30, 2015, the Company did not have any outstanding balance under the Demand Line of Credit.

 

On May 14, 2015, the stock repurchase program that was authorized in August 2014 was terminated by our Board of Directors in connection with approving the special cash dividend.

 

22



Table of Contents

 

CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

Net cash used in operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 of $0.4 million compared to cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 of $11.6 million.  This change was primarily due to payments of taxes associated with the gain on the sale of our ownership interest in the O-P.

 

CASH FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

Net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $1.0 million compared to cash provided by investing activities of $49.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.  Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was due to the purchase of leasehold improvements and furniture for the new office lease in Philadelphia, PA.  Net cash provided by investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily due to the $49.8 million proceeds from the exercise of the O-P Put that represented the return of our investment.

 

CASH FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

Net cash used in financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $16.1 million compared to cash used in financing activities of $10.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we paid out $15.6 million for a special dividend of $2.60 per common share.  In addition, we purchased $0.1 million of treasury shares from employee restricted stock vestings and made capital lease payments totaling $0.4 million.  The financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 were attributed to the repayment of our outstanding balance of $11.6 million on our TriState credit facility from the proceeds received for the sale of our ownership in the O-P partnership.

 

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

We are not subject to any material market risk. Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from our borrowing activities. There were no material changes to our quantitative disclosure about market risk as presented in item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and our Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and our Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2015. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1A. - RISK FACTORS

 

There were no material changes to our risk factors as presented in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended for the year ended December 31, 2014, with exception of the following:

 

Reductions in USF funding and intercarrier compensation may negatively impact our financial results.  Additional regulatory changes may have a material adverse effect on our operations as well.

 

We operate in a heavily regulated industry.  A significant portion of the revenues in our Telephone segment has generally been supported by regulations that provide for local and network access revenues and USF funds.  Changes in the funding and/or payout rules for the USF will further reduce our revenues obtained from the USF and we may not be able to replace this lost revenue.

 

On November 28, 2011, the FCC released a comprehensive order regarding reform of the Universal Service Fund and Intercarrier Compensation (“ICC”).  The order specified that the USF would be renamed the Connect America Fund (“CAF”).  Funds from CAF will be allocated with a greater emphasis on stimulating broadband build out in the United States.  Additionally, the order mandated a decline in overall revenues deemed interstate.  Currently these revenues are received from end users, interexchange carriers and the USF.  The total of these revenues will decline 5% a year and the USF or CAF support must decline accordingly.  This change commenced on July 1, 2012 and will continue annually for the next 10 years.

 

Finally, the order contains a provision that implements a “ceiling” on the amount of corporate overhead expenses that can be recovered by an ILEC through CAF.  Historically, the USF fund has allowed ILECs to recover their reasonable costs without restriction.  In 2012, a ceiling was established based on corporate overhead cost per access line.  Accordingly, we anticipate a significant reduction in funds that we are eligible to receive from the USF.  This reduction in USF revenue is expected to significantly impact our revenues and financial results over the next several years.

 

23



Table of Contents

 

On November 28, 2011, the FCC released a comprehensive order concerning Intercarrier Compensation.  The order reflected the FCC’s desire for telephone companies to eventually eliminate intercarrier compensation altogether.  To implement this, the FCC has mandated that companies lower their access rates at the intrastate level to the interstate rate level by 2013 which we have complied with.  In addition, a rate of return carrier, such as us, must reduce its rates for some access elements to zero within nine years.  While this will be offset to some extent by additional end user charges (known as ARC or Access Recovery Charge), the overall effect will be a decline in revenue.

 

On July 29, 2015 the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) released a public notice that, pursuant to the FCC’s USF/ICC Transformation Order from 2011, a rule was adopted to eliminate high-cost universal service support in ILEC study areas where an unsubsidized carrier or a combination of unsubsidized carriers offers voice and broadband services that meet certain service obligations as defined by the FCC. The public notice published the study areas where there was 100 percent overlap between subsidized and unsubsidized carriers.  The preliminary findings of the study indicated Alteva’s ILEC coverage in New Jersey was determined to be 100 percent overlapped, and Alteva’s ILEC coverage in New York was determined to be between 99 and 100 percent overlapped.  The Company filed a response indicating there was not 100% overlap coverage, however, further communication from the FCC regarding their determination is pending.  If the FCC does not agree with the Company’s analysis, or it is determined by the FCC in future years that the overlap coverage is 100 percent, we would be subject to the elimination of the subsidies. For the year ended December 31, 2014, we received $0.3 million in subsidies for our ILEC coverage in New Jersey and $0.8 million in subsidies for our ILEC coverage in New York.

 

Additional regulatory changes could adversely impact the rates we are permitted to charge our customers, reduce payments to us from the USF or restrict our ability to effectively compete in the market place.  Regulatory changes could also restrict our ability to secure new sources of capital and/or grow through strategic acquisitions or alliances.  In addition, the failure of regulations to change in a manner that would establish an environment in which we may compete on more even terms with our actual economic competitors could also adversely affect our profitability.

 

The Company may fail to complete the proposed merger with and into MBS Holdings, Inc.

 

On September 2, 2015, the Company, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with MBS Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and Arrow Merger Subsidiary, Inc., a New York corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent.

 

Completion of the Merger is subject to various closing conditions, including, among others, (a) the affirmative vote of at least seventy percent (70%) of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at a special shareholders meeting (“Shareholders’ Meeting”) in favor of adopting the Merger Agreement and approving the Merger, (b) the receipt of required regulatory approvals and consents, and (c) the absence of any law, injunction, judgment, order, decree or ruling restraining or prohibiting consummation of the Merger.  Each party’s obligation to consummate the Merger is also subject to certain additional conditions, which include the accuracy of the other party’s representations and warranties and the other party’s compliance with its covenants and obligations in all material respects (in each case, as contained in the Merger Agreement).

 

There can be no assurance that the Company will receive the necessary approvals for the transaction or that the Company will be able to hold the Shareholders’ Meeting as currently scheduled. Delays in the Merger closing, could divert attention from the Company’s ongoing operations on the part of management and employees and adversely impact the Company. Failure to complete the Merger for any reason could negatively impact the Company’s: ability to motivate and retain employees, relationships with customers and vendors, stock price and future business and financial results.

 

The Company has incurred and expects to incur substantial transaction fees and costs in connection with the Merger.

 

The Company has incurred and expects to incur additional material non-recurring expenses in connection with the Merger and completion of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. If the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement is not approved by the Shareholders, or if the Merger is not consummated for any other reason, under specified circumstances, Alteva will be required to pay Parent (a) a termination fee of $873,000, or (b) the lesser of $750,000 and Parent’s documented out-of-pocket transaction fees and expenses actually incurred in connection with the transactions contemplated in the Merger Agreement.

 

Litigation has been instituted against the Company and members of the Company’s board of directors, challenging the Merger, and adverse judgments in these lawsuits may prevent the Merger from becoming effective within the expected timeframe or at all.

 

The Company and members of the Company’s board of directors have been, and may continue to be, named as defendants in lawsuits or other proceedings that may be brought by Shareholders challenging the Merger. See “Note 15: Subsequent Events” in the notes to the condensed and consolidated financial statements above. Even if the plaintiffs in these potential actions are not successful in obtaining an injunction, they may nevertheless continue the action and seek damages after the Merger has closed. In addition, the costs of defending against such claims could adversely affect the financial condition of the Company. We cannot provide any assurance that such proceedings, and, if relevant, the settlement of any such proceedings, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company, its operations or future prospects.

 

24



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

 

3.1

 

Articles of Incorporation, as amended, are incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3(i) to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.

 

 

 

3.2

 

By-Laws, as amended, are incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

 

 

 

3.3

 

Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation filed with the New York Department of State on May 21, 2013 is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

 

 

 

10.1

 

Partnership Interest Purchase Agreement as of April 30, 2014 between Alteva, Inc. and Cellco Partnership is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014.

 

 

 

10.2

 

400 Market Street Office Lease as of February 27, 2015 between Alteva, Inc. and 400 Market L.P. is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015.

 

 

 

10.3

 

Form of Global Amendment to Award Agreements Under The Amended and Restated Warwick Valley Company 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 27, 2015.

 

 

 

10.4

 

Merger Agreement dated September 2, 2015, by and between Alteva, Inc. and MBS Holdings, Inc. and Arrow Merger Subsidiary, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3, 2015.

 

 

 

10.5

 

Form of Global Amendment to Certain Restricted Stock Award Agreements under the Amended and Restated Warwick Valley Company 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

 

 

 

31.1

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification signed by Brian J. Kelley, Chief Executive Officer.

 

 

 

31.2

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification signed by Andrea E. McHugh, Interim Chief Financial Officer.

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by Brian J. Kelley, Chief Executive Officer.

 

 

 

32.2

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by Andrea E. McHugh, Interim Chief Financial Officer.

 

 

 

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document.

 

 

 

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

 

 

 

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

 

 

 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

 

 

 

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

 

 

 

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

 

25



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

Alteva, Inc.

 

 

(Registrant)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

November 13, 2015

 

/s/ Brian J. Kelley

 

 

Brian J. Kelley

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

November 13, 2015

 

/s/ Andrea E. McHugh

 

 

Andrea E. McHugh

 

 

Interim Chief Financial Officer

 

 

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

26



Table of Contents

 

Index to Exhibits

 

3.1

 

Articles of Incorporation, as amended, are incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3(i) to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.

 

 

 

3.2

 

By-Laws, as amended, are incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

 

 

 

3.3

 

Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation filed with the New York Department of State on May 21, 2013 is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

 

 

 

10.1

 

Partnership Interest Purchase Agreement as of April 30, 2014 between Alteva, Inc. and Cellco Partnership is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014.

 

 

 

10.2

 

400 Market Street Office Lease as of February 27, 2015 between Alteva, Inc. and 400 Market L.P. is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015.

 

 

 

10.3

 

Form of Global Amendment to Award Agreements Under The Amended and Restated Warwick Valley Company 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 27, 2015.

 

 

 

10.4

 

Merger Agreement dated September 2, 2015, by and between Alteva, Inc. and MBS Holdings, Inc. and Arrow Merger Subsidiary, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 3, 2015.

 

 

 

10.5

 

Form of Global Amendment to Certain Restricted Stock Award Agreements under the Amended and Restated Warwick Valley Company 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

 

 

 

31.1

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification signed by Brian J. Kelley, Chief Executive Officer.

 

 

 

31.2

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification signed by Andrea E. McHugh, Interim Chief Financial Officer.

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by Brian J. Kelley, Chief Executive Officer.

 

 

 

32.2

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by Andrea E. McHugh, Interim Chief Financial Officer.

 

 

 

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document.

 

 

 

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

 

 

 

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

 

 

 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

 

 

 

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

 

 

 

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

 

27