Attached files

file filename
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 CFO CERTIFICATION - HEALTH NET INCexhibit3122015q2_cfocertif.htm
EX-10.2 - EXHIBIT 10.2 - HEALTH NET INCexhibit1022015q2_formpsuaw.htm
EX-10.5 - EXHIBIT 10.5 - HEALTH NET INCexhibit1052015q2_directorc.htm
EX-10.4 - EXHIBIT 10.4 - HEALTH NET INCexhibit1042015q2_formrsuaw.htm
EX-10.3 - EXHIBIT 10.3 - HEALTH NET INCexhibit1032015q2_formrsuaw.htm
EX-10.6 - EXHIBIT 10.6 - HEALTH NET INCexhibit1062015q2_redacteda.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 CEO CERTIFICATION - HEALTH NET INCexhibit3112015q2_ceocertif.htm
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 CEO & CFO CERTIFICATION - HEALTH NET INCexhibit322015q2_ceocfocert.htm
EX-10.1 - EXHIBIT 10.1_EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - HEALTH NET INCexhibit1012015q2_employmen.htm


 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
____________________
FORM 10-Q
____________________
(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015
or
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-12718
____________________
HEALTH NET, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
____________________
Delaware
95-4288333
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
21650 Oxnard Street, Woodland Hills, CA
91367
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(818) 676-6000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
____________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes   o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes   o No  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):  
x
Large accelerated filer
o
 Accelerated filer
o
 Non-accelerated filer
o
Smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    o  Yes    x  No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock as of July 30, 2015 was 77,286,787 (excluding 76,442,853 shares held as treasury stock).
 
 
 
 
 




HEALTH NET, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
 
 
Page 
 
Part I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1—Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 4—Controls and Procedures
Part II—OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1—Legal Proceedings
Item 1A—Risk Factors
Item 2—Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 3—Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 4—Mine Safety Disclosures
69
Item 5—Other Information
69
Item 6—Exhibits
Signatures


2



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item  1.
Financial Statements
HEALTH NET, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Health plan services premiums
$
4,003,432

 
$
3,261,878

 
$
7,724,232

 
$
6,143,223

Government contracts
141,055

 
154,083

 
295,769

 
298,173

Net investment income
16,424

 
12,043

 
29,665

 
23,145

Administrative services fees and other income
2,712

 
(6,612
)
 
3,853

 
(4,214
)
Total revenues
4,163,623

 
3,421,392

 
8,053,519

 
6,460,327

Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Health plan services (excluding depreciation and amortization)
3,363,742

 
2,763,179

 
6,506,605

 
5,165,521

Government contracts
137,262

 
133,208

 
279,802

 
265,182

General and administrative
448,713

 
344,734

 
902,561

 
705,757

Selling
69,190

 
64,002

 
137,886

 
128,154

Depreciation and amortization
4,202

 
9,641

 
8,509

 
19,304

Interest
8,412

 
7,826

 
16,461

 
15,647

Asset impairment

 

 
1,884

 

Total expenses
4,031,521

 
3,322,590

 
7,853,708

 
6,299,565

Income from operations before income taxes
132,102

 
98,802

 
199,811

 
160,762

Income tax provision
73,734

 
(22,065
)
 
111,455

 
11,108

Net income
$
58,368

 
$
120,867

 
$
88,356

 
$
149,654

Net income per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.76

 
$
1.51

 
$
1.15

 
$
1.87

Diluted
$
0.75

 
$
1.49

 
$
1.13

 
$
1.85

Weighted average shares outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
77,172

 
80,250

 
77,129

 
80,026

Diluted
78,157

 
81,218

 
78,264

 
81,070

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

3



HEALTH NET, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Net income
$
58,368

 
$
120,867

 
$
88,356

 
$
149,654

Other comprehensive (loss) income before tax:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized (losses) gains on investments available-for-sale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the period
(31,186
)
 
23,520

 
(14,904
)
 
51,908

Less: Reclassification adjustments for gains included in earnings
(1,564
)
 
(1,928
)
 
(2,169
)
 
(2,236
)
Unrealized (losses) gains on investments available-for-sale, net
(32,750
)
 
21,592

 
(17,073
)
 
49,672

    Defined benefit pension plans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prior service cost arising during the period

 

 

 

Net loss arising during the period

 

 

 

Less: Amortization of prior service cost and net loss included in net periodic pension cost
640

 
150

 
1,280

 
300

    Defined benefit pension plans, net
640

 
150

 
1,280

 
300

Other comprehensive (loss) income before tax
(32,110
)
 
21,742

 
(15,793
)
 
49,972

Income tax (benefit) expense related to components of other comprehensive income
(11,273
)
 
7,683

 
(5,515
)
 
17,556

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
(20,837
)
 
14,059

 
(10,278
)
 
32,416

Comprehensive income
$
37,531

 
$
134,926

 
$
78,078

 
$
182,070


See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.


4



HEALTH NET, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
 
2015
 
2014
ASSETS
 
 
 
Current Assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
756,797

 
$
869,133

Investments-available-for-sale (amortized cost: 2015-$2,374,767, 2014-$1,777,404)
2,371,540

 
1,791,060

Premiums receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts (2015-$1,646, 2014-$1,671)
434,067

 
951,935

Amounts receivable under government contracts
223,160

 
150,546

Other receivables
459,090

 
424,910

Deferred taxes
62,983

 
57,911

Assets held for sale
50,000

 
50,000

Other assets
501,200

 
220,122

Total current assets
4,858,837

 
4,515,617

Property and equipment, net
80,816

 
84,328

Goodwill
558,886

 
558,886

Other intangible assets, net
10,415

 
11,822

Deferred taxes
43,588

 
33,081

Investments-available-for-sale-noncurrent (amortized cost: 2015-$7,637, 2014-$5,474)
6,544

 
4,570

Other noncurrent assets
300,572

 
187,630

Total Assets
$
5,859,658

 
$
5,395,934

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
Current Liabilities:
 
 
 
Reserves for claims and other settlements
$
1,757,939

 
$
1,896,035

Health care and other costs payable under government contracts
75,092

 
71,988

Unearned premiums
190,021

 
96,106

Accounts payable and other liabilities
1,168,014

 
880,374

Total current liabilities
3,191,066

 
2,944,503

Senior notes payable
399,607

 
399,504

Borrowings under revolving credit facility
210,000

 
100,000

Other noncurrent liabilities
346,915

 
242,705

Total Liabilities
4,147,588

 
3,686,712

Commitments and contingencies


 


Stockholders’ Equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock ($0.001 par value, 10,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding)

 

Common stock ($0.001 par value, 350,000 shares authorized; issued 2015- 153,728 shares; 2014-152,451 shares)
154

 
153

Additional paid-in capital
1,481,691

 
1,444,705

Treasury common stock, at cost (2015-76,442 shares of common stock; 2014-74,378 shares of common stock)
(2,453,869
)
 
(2,341,652
)
Retained earnings
2,697,633

 
2,609,277

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(13,539
)
 
(3,261
)
Total Stockholders’ Equity
1,712,070

 
1,709,222

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
$
5,859,658

 
$
5,395,934

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

5



HEALTH NET, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)

 
Common Stock
Additional Paid-In Capital
Common Stock
Held in Treasury
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
 
Shares  
Amount
Shares  
Amount
Balance as of January 1, 2014
150,224

$
150

$
1,377,624

(70,704
)
$
(2,179,744
)
$
2,463,648

$
(32,867
)
$
1,628,811

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
149,654

 
149,654

Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 
32,416

32,416

Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units
1,331

2

12,098

 
 
 
 
12,100

Share-based compensation expense
 
 
15,700

 
 
 
 
15,700

Tax benefit related to equity compensation plans
 
 
1,346

 
 
 
 
1,346

Repurchases of common stock
 
 
 
(547
)
(18,146
)
 
 
(18,146
)
Balance as of June 30, 2014
151,555

$
152

$
1,406,768

(71,251
)
$
(2,197,890
)
$
2,613,302

$
(451
)
$
1,821,881

Balance as of January 1, 2015
152,451

$
153

$
1,444,705

(74,378
)
$
(2,341,652
)
$
2,609,277

$
(3,261
)
$
1,709,222

Net income
 
 
 
 
 
88,356

 
88,356

Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
(10,278
)
(10,278
)
Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units
1,277

1

18,223

 
 
 
 
18,224

Share-based compensation expense
 
 
13,735

 
 
 
 
13,735

Tax benefit related to equity compensation plans
 
 
5,028

 
 
 
 
5,028

Repurchases of common stock
 
 
 
(2,064
)
(112,217
)
 
 
(112,217
)
Balance as of June 30, 2015
153,728

$
154

$
1,481,691

(76,442
)
$
(2,453,869
)
$
2,697,633

$
(13,539
)
$
1,712,070

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

6



 HEALTH NET, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Net income
$
88,356

 
$
149,654

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Amortization and depreciation
8,509

 
19,304

Asset impairment charges
1,884

 

Share-based compensation expense
13,735

 
15,700

Deferred income taxes
(10,044
)
 
3,476

Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation
(5,190
)
 
(1,354
)
Net realized (gain) loss on investments
(2,169
)
 
(2,236
)
Other changes
20,506

 
15,926

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and dispositions:
 
 
 
Premiums receivable and unearned premiums
611,783

 
(412,141
)
Other current assets, receivables and noncurrent assets
(315,673
)
 
(216,808
)
Amounts receivable/payable under government contracts
(46,392
)
 
33,597

Reserves for claims and other settlements
(138,096
)
 
504,247

Accounts payable and other liabilities
373,134

 
188,343

Net cash provided by operating activities
600,343

 
297,708

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Sales of investments
541,415

 
192,250

Maturities of investments
53,454

 
43,679

Purchases of investments
(1,314,248
)
 
(228,437
)
Purchases of property and equipment
(28,329
)
 
(29,956
)
Sales (purchases) of restricted investments and other
(5,640
)
 
760

Net cash used in investing activities
(753,348
)
 
(21,704
)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases
16,551

 
6,472

Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation
5,190

 
1,354

Repurchases of common stock
(111,978
)
 
(12,518
)
Borrowings under financing arrangements
225,000

 

Repayment of borrowings under financing arrangements
(115,000
)
 

Net increase (decrease) in checks outstanding, net of deposits
8,230

 

Customer funds administered
12,676

 
(101,370
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
40,669

 
(106,062
)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(112,336
)
 
169,942

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
869,133

 
433,155

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
756,797

 
$
603,097

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOWS DISCLOSURE:
 
 
 
Interest paid
$
15,447

 
$
14,754

Income taxes paid
133,160

 
59,324

See accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements.

7



HEALTH NET, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT EVENTS
Basis of Presentation
Health Net, Inc. prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements following the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") for interim reporting. In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Company,” “Health Net,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Health Net, Inc. and its subsidiaries. As permitted under those rules and regulations, certain notes or other financial information that are normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") have been condensed or omitted if they substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the annual audited financial statements. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read together with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 ("Form 10-K").
We are responsible for the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. These consolidated financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments that are considered necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position and operating results in accordance with GAAP. In accordance with GAAP, we make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. In addition, revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities can vary during each quarter of the year. Therefore, the results and trends in these interim financial statements may not be indicative of those for the full year.
Significant Events
Proposed Merger
On July 2, 2015, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Centene Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Centene"), together with Chopin Merger Sub I, Inc. ("Merger Sub I") and Chopin Merger Sub II, Inc. ("Merger Sub II"), each a Delaware corporation and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Centene. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, (i) Merger Sub I will merge with and into the Company (the "Merger"), with the Company as the surviving corporation (the "Surviving Corporation") and (ii) subject to delivery of a legal opinion from counsel to the Surviving Corporation regarding certain aspects of the tax treatment of the transactions, immediately after the consummation of the Merger, the Surviving Corporation will merge with and into Merger Sub II, with Merger Sub II continuing as the surviving company.
At the effective time of the Merger, the Company's existing stockholders will receive per share merger consideration consisting of $28.25 in cash and 0.6220 of one share of Centene's common stock.
The Company and Centene each have agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to directly or indirectly solicit competing acquisition proposals or to enter into, continue or participate in discussions or negotiations concerning, or enter into any letter of intent, memorandum of understanding, merger agreement or other agreement relating to, an alternative business combination. However, the board of directors of the Company may, subject to certain conditions, withdraw its recommendation that its stockholders vote in favor of adoption of the Merger Agreement and terminate the Merger Agreement, and the Centene board of directors may, subject to certain conditions, withdraw its recommendation that its stockholders vote in favor of approval of the issuance of common stock forming part of the Merger Consideration and terminate the Merger Agreement, in connection with the receipt of an alternative proposal that the Company's board or Centene's board, as the case may be, determines constitutes a superior proposal, and such board determines in good faith that a failure to effect such a withdrawal of recommendation would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties.
The completion of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions, including approval by the Company's stockholders of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval by Centene's stockholders of the issuance of the common stock forming part of the merger consideration, as well as various regulatory approvals. The completion of the Merger is not conditioned on receipt of financing by Centene. The Merger is expected to close by early 2016.

8



Cognizant Transaction
On November 2, 2014, we entered into a master services agreement (as subsequently amended and restated, the "Master Services Agreement") with Cognizant Healthcare Services, LLC to provide certain services to us. In connection with the Master Services Agreement, we also entered into an asset purchase agreement (the "Asset Purchase Agreement") pursuant to which we have agreed to sell certain software assets and related intellectual property we own to Cognizant (the "Asset Sale," and together with the transactions contemplated by the Master Services Agreement, the "Cognizant Transaction"). The closing of the Cognizant Transaction and commencement of services under the Master Services Agreement on the BPaaS Services Commencement Date (as defined in the Master Services Agreement), is subject to receipt of required regulatory approvals, and the closing of the related Asset Sale is scheduled for the BPaaS Services Commencement Date.
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, we have classified $50.0 million, at fair value less cost to sell, in assets as assets held for sale. See Note 3 for additional information about our agreement with Cognizant and the assets held for sale, and Note 11 for additional information regarding our subsequent amendment to the Master Services Agreement.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with maturity of three months or less when purchased. We had $8.2 million and $0 checks outstanding, net of deposits as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Checks outstanding, net of deposits are classified as accounts payable and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and the changes are reflected in the line item net increase (decrease) in checks outstanding, net of deposits within the cash flows from financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Investments
Investments classified as available-for-sale, which consist primarily of debt securities, are stated at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are excluded from earnings and reported as other comprehensive income, net of income tax effects. The cost of investments sold is determined in accordance with the specific identification method and realized gains and losses are included in net investment income. We analyze all debt investments that have unrealized losses for impairment consideration and assess the intent to sell such securities. If such intent exists, impaired securities are considered other-than-temporarily impaired. Management also assesses if we may be required to sell the debt investments prior to the recovery of amortized cost, which may also trigger an impairment charge. If securities are considered other-than-temporarily impaired based on intent or ability, we assess whether the amortized costs of the securities can be recovered. If management anticipates recovering an amount less than the amortized cost of the securities, an impairment charge is calculated based on the expected discounted cash flows of the securities. Any deficit between the amortized cost and the expected cash flows is recorded through earnings as a charge. All other temporary impairment charges are recorded through other comprehensive income. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, no losses were recognized from other-than-temporary impairments.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The estimated fair value amounts of cash equivalents, investments available-for-sale, premiums and other receivables, notes receivable and notes payable have been determined by using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. The carrying amounts of cash equivalents approximate fair value due to the short maturity of those instruments. Fair values for debt and equity securities are generally based upon quoted market prices. Where quoted market prices were not readily available, fair values were estimated using valuation methodologies based on available and observable market information. Such valuation methodologies include reviewing the value ascribed to the most recent financing, comparing the security with securities of publicly traded companies in a similar line of business, and reviewing the underlying financial performance including estimating discounted cash flows. The carrying value of premiums and other receivables, long-term notes receivable and nonmarketable securities approximates the fair value of such financial instruments. The fair value of notes payable is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to us for debt with the same remaining maturities. The fair value of our fixed-rate borrowings was $427.3 million and $437.0 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the fair value of our variable-rate borrowings under our revolving credit facility was $210.0 million and $100.0 million, respectively. The fair value of our fixed-rate borrowings was determined using the quoted market price, which is a Level 1 input in the fair value hierarchy. The fair

9



value of our variable-rate borrowings was estimated to equal the carrying value because the interest rates paid on these borrowings were based on prevailing market rates. Since the pricing inputs are other than quoted prices and fair value is determined using an income approach, our variable-rate borrowings are classified as a Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. See Notes 7 and 8 for additional information regarding our financing arrangements and fair value measurements, respectively.
Health Plan Services Revenue Recognition
Health plan services premium revenues generally include HMO, PPO, EPO and POS premiums from employer groups and individuals and from Medicare recipients who have purchased supplemental benefit coverage, for which premiums are based on a predetermined prepaid fee, Medicaid revenues based on multi-year contracts to provide care to Medicaid recipients, revenue under Medicare risk contracts to provide care to enrolled Medicare recipients and revenue under our dual eligible members who are participating in the California Coordinated Care Initiative (the "CCI"). Revenue is recognized in the month in which the related enrollees are entitled to health care services. Premiums collected in advance of the month in which enrollees are entitled to health care services are recorded as unearned premiums.
Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “ACA”), commercial health plans with medical loss ratios ("MLR") on fully insured products, as calculated as set forth in the ACA, that fall below certain targets are required to rebate ratable portions of their premiums annually. We classify the estimated rebates, if any, as a reduction to health plan services premiums in our consolidated statement of operations. Estimated rebates for our commercial health plans were $0 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In addition to the rebates for the commercial health plans under the ACA, there is also a medical loss ratio corridor for the California Department of Health Care Services ("DHCS") adult Medicaid expansion members under the state Medicaid program in California ("Medi-Cal") from January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015. If our MLR for this population is below 85%, then we would have to pay DHCS a rebate. If the MLR is above 95%, then DHCS would have to pay us additional premium. Accordingly, for the three months ended June 30, 2015, we increased health plan services premium revenue by $2.5 million and during the six months ended June 30, 2015 we reduced health plan services premium revenue by $60.9 million related to the MLR rebates. No MLR rebates were recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we have accrued $261.5 million and $200.6 million, respectively, in MLR rebates with respect to this population payable to DHCS. Our Medicaid contract with the state of Arizona contains profit-sharing provisions. Because our Arizona Medicaid profits were in excess of the amount we are allowed to fully retain, we reduced health plan services premium revenue by $10.0 million and $6.6 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and reduced health plan services premium revenue by $25.8 million and $8.0 million, for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. With respect to our Arizona Medicaid contract, the profit corridor receivable balance included in other noncurrent assets as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $0 and $2.3 million, respectively, and the profit corridor payable balance included in accounts payable and other liabilities as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $7.2 million and $27.0 million, respectively. The profit corridor payable balance included in other noncurrent liabilities as of June 30, 2015 was $7.1 million and $0 as of December 31, 2014. In the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System ("AHCCCS") withheld $36.2 million in connection with the profit corridor payable from our capitation payment. See below in this Note 2 under the heading "Accounting for Certain Provisions of the ACA" for additional information.
Our Medicare Advantage contracts are with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS"). CMS deploys a risk adjustment model which apportions premiums paid to all health plans according to health severity and certain demographic factors. This risk adjustment model results in periodic changes in our risk factor adjustment scores for certain diagnostic codes, which then result in changes to our health plan services premium revenues. Because the recorded revenue is based on our best estimate at the time, the actual payment we receive from CMS for risk adjustment reimbursement settlements may be materially different than the amounts we have initially recognized on our financial statements. The change in our estimate for the risk adjustment revenue related to prior years in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 increased health plan services premium revenues by $9.1 million and $3.7 million, respectively. The change in our estimate for the risk adjustment revenue related to prior years in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 increased health plan services premium revenues by $4.4 million and $20.0 million, respectively.
Our premiums from the Medi-Cal programs and other state-sponsored health programs are subject to certain retroactive premium adjustments based on expected and actual health care costs. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, retroactive premium adjustments for our Medi-Cal member risk reassignment for prior years increased premium revenue by $2.6 million and $29.8 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, retroactive premium adjustments for prior periods were not material.

10



In addition, our state-sponsored health care programs in California, including Medi-Cal, seniors and persons with disabilities ("SPD") programs, the dual eligibles demonstration portion of the California Coordinated Care Initiative that began in April 2014 and Medicaid expansion under federal health care reform that began in January 2014, are subject to retrospective premium adjustments based on certain risk sharing provisions included in our state-sponsored health plans rate settlement agreement described below. We estimate and recognize the retrospective adjustments to premium revenue based upon experience to date under our state-sponsored health care programs contracts. The retrospective premium adjustment is recorded as an adjustment to premium revenue and other noncurrent assets.
On November 2, 2012, we entered into a state-sponsored health plans rate settlement agreement (the "Agreement") with the DHCS to settle historical rate disputes with respect to our participation in the Medi-Cal program, for rate years prior to the 2011–2012 rate year. As part of the Agreement, DHCS agreed, among other things, to (1) an extension of all of our Medi-Cal managed care contracts existing as of the date of the Agreement for an additional five years from their then existing expiration dates; (2) retrospective premium adjustments on all of our state-sponsored health care programs, including Medi-Cal, which includes SPDs, Healthy Families, the dual eligibles demonstration portion of the CCI that began in 2014 and Medi-Cal expansion populations that also began in 2014 (our “state-sponsored health care programs”), which are tracked in a settlement account as discussed in more detail below; and (3) compensate us should DHCS terminate any of our state-sponsored health care programs contracts early.
Effective January 1, 2013, the settlement account (the "Account") was established with an initial balance of zero. The balance in the Account is adjusted annually to reflect retrospective premium adjustments for each calendar year (referenced in the Agreement as a "deficit" or "surplus"). A deficit or surplus will result to the extent our actual pretax margin (as defined in the Agreement) on our state-sponsored health care programs is below or above a predetermined pretax margin target. The amount of any deficit or surplus is calculated as described in the Agreement. Cash settlement of the Account will occur on December 31, 2019, except that under certain circumstances the DHCS may extend the final settlement for up to three additional one-year periods (as may be extended, the "Term"). In addition, the DHCS will make an interim partial settlement payment to us if it terminates any of our state-sponsored health care programs contracts early. Upon expiration of the Term, if the Account is in a surplus position, then no monies are owed to either party. If the Account is in a deficit position, then DHCS shall pay the amount of the deficit to us. In no event, however, shall the amount paid by DHCS to us under the Agreement exceed $264 million or be less than an alternative minimum amount as defined in the Agreement.
We estimate and recognize the retrospective adjustments to premium revenue based upon experience to date under our state-sponsored health care programs contracts. The retrospective premium adjustment is recorded as an adjustment to premium revenue and other noncurrent assets. As of June 30, 2015, we had calculated a surplus of $171.6 million. As a surplus Account position results in no monies due to either party upon expiration of the Term, we have no receivable and no payable recorded as of June 30, 2015 in connection with the Agreement. As of December 31, 2014, we had calculated a surplus of $53.4 million under the Agreement and reduced our receivable to zero, reflecting our cumulative estimated retrospective premium adjustment to the Account based on our actual pretax margin for the period beginning on January 1, 2013 and ending on December 31, 2014. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, our health plan services premium revenue was reduced by $40.4 million and $53.3 million, respectively, as a result of the change in the deficit calculated during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.
Health Plan Services Health Care Cost
The cost of health care services is recognized in the period in which services are provided and includes an estimate of the cost of services that have been incurred but not yet reported. Such costs include payments to primary care physicians, specialists, hospitals and outpatient care facilities, and the costs associated with managing the extent of such care. Our health care cost also can include from time to time remediation of certain claims as a result of periodic reviews by various regulatory agencies.
We estimate the amount of the provision for health care service costs incurred but not yet reported ("IBNR") in accordance with GAAP and using standard actuarial developmental methodologies based upon historical data including the period between the date services are rendered and the date claims are received and paid, denied claim activity, expected medical cost inflation, seasonality patterns and changes in membership, among other things.
Our IBNR best estimate also includes a provision for adverse deviation, which is an estimate for known environmental factors that are reasonably likely to affect the required level of IBNR reserves. This provision for adverse deviation is intended to capture the potential adverse development from known environmental factors such as our entry into new geographical markets, changes in our geographic or product mix, the introduction of new customer populations, variation in benefit utilization, disease outbreaks, changes in provider reimbursement, fluctuations in medical cost trend, variation in claim submission patterns and variation in claims processing speed and payment

11



patterns, changes in technology that provide faster access to claims data or changes in the speed of adjudication and settlement of claims, variability in claims inventory levels, non-standard claim development, and/or exceptional situations that require judgmental adjustments in setting the reserves for claims.
We consistently apply our IBNR estimation methodology from period to period. Our IBNR best estimate is made on an accrual basis and adjusted in future periods as required. Any adjustments to the prior period estimates are included in the current period. As additional information becomes known to us, we adjust our assumptions accordingly to change our estimate of IBNR. Therefore, if moderately adverse conditions do not occur, evidenced by more complete claims information in the following period, then our prior period estimates will be revised downward, resulting in favorable development. However, any favorable prior period reserve development would increase current period net income only to the extent that the current period provision for adverse deviation is less than the benefit recognized from the prior period favorable development. If moderately adverse conditions occur and are more acute than we estimated, then our prior period estimates will be revised upward, resulting in unfavorable development, which would decrease current period net income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we had $14.3 million and $99.7 million, respectively, in net favorable reserve developments related to prior years. The amount for the three months ended June 30, 2015 consisted of $2.4 million in favorable prior year development and a release of $11.9 million of the provision for adverse deviation held at December 31, 2014. The amount for the six months ended June 30, 2015 consisted of $23.0 million in favorable prior year development and a release of $76.7 million of the provision for adverse deviation held at December 31, 2014. We believe that the $23.0 million favorable development for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily due to the growth of the new Medicaid expansion population in 2014. As part of our best estimate for IBNR, the provision for adverse deviation recorded as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $79.4 million and $77.7 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, we had $3.7 million and $26.6 million, respectively, in net favorable reserve developments related to prior years. The amount for the three months ended June 30, 2014 consisted of $1.1 million in unfavorable prior year development primarily due to the existence of moderately adverse conditions and a release of $4.8 million of the provision for adverse deviation held at December 31, 2013. The amount for the six months ended June 30, 2014 consisted of $24.2 million in unfavorable prior year development primarily due to the existence of moderately adverse conditions and a release of $50.8 million of the provision for adverse deviation held at December 31, 2013. We believe that the $1.1 million and $24.2 million unfavorable developments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, were due to unanticipated benefit utilization in our commercial business arising from dates of service in the fourth quarter of 2013 as a result of an uncertain environment related to the ACA. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the reserve development related to prior years, when considered together with the provision for adverse deviation recorded as of June 30, 2015, did not have a material impact on our operating results or financial condition.
The majority of the IBNR reserve balance held at each quarter-end is associated with the most recent months' incurred services because these are the services for which the fewest claims have been paid. The degree of uncertainty in the estimates of incurred claims is greater for the most recent months' incurred services. Revised estimates for prior periods are determined in each quarter based on the most recent updates of paid claims for prior periods. Estimates for service costs incurred but not yet reported are subject to the impact of changes in the regulatory environment, economic conditions, changes in claims trends, and numerous other factors. Given the inherent variability of such estimates, the actual liability could differ materially from the amounts estimated.
Government Contracts
On April 1, 2011, we began delivery of administrative services under our Managed Care Support Contract (the "T-3 contract") for the TRICARE North Region. The T-3 contract was awarded to us on May 13, 2010, and included five one-year option periods. On March 15, 2014, the U.S. Department of Defense ("Department of Defense" or "DoD") exercised the last of these options, which extended the T-3 contract through March 31, 2015. On June 27, 2014, at the DoD's request, we submitted a proposal to add three additional one-year option periods to the T-3 contract. In March 2015, the DoD modified our T-3 contract to add three additional one-year option periods and awarded us the first of the three option periods, which allows us to continue providing access to health care services to TRICARE beneficiaries through March 31, 2016. If all three one-year option periods are ultimately exercised, the T-3 contract would conclude on March 31, 2018. On April 24, 2015, the DoD issued its final request for proposal for the next generation TRICARE contract (the "T-2017 contracts"). On July 23, 2015, we responded to the DoD's request for proposal, which will reduce the three existing TRICARE regions to two regions. The DoD anticipates it will award the T-2017 contracts in the first quarter of 2016, with health care delivery commencing on April 1, 2017.

12


Revenues and expenses associated with the T-3 contract are reported as part of Government Contracts revenues and Government Contracts expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and included in the Government Contracts reportable segment.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, investments and premiums receivable. All cash equivalents and investments are managed within established guidelines, which provide us diversity among issuers. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to premiums receivable are limited due to the large number of payers comprising our customer base. The federal government is the primary customer of our Government Contracts reportable segment with fees and premiums associated with this customer accounting for approximately 96% of our Government Contracts revenue. In addition, the federal government is a significant customer of our Western Region Operations reportable segment as a result of our contract with CMS for coverage of Medicare-eligible individuals. Furthermore, our Medicaid revenue is derived in California through our contracts with the DHCS, and in Arizona through our contract with the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System ("AHCCCS"). The DHCS is a significant customer of our Western Region Operations reportable segment.

13



Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes all changes in stockholders’ equity (except those arising from transactions with stockholders) and includes net income (loss), net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) after tax on investments available-for-sale and prior service cost and net loss related to our defined benefit pension plan.
Our accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:  
 
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on investments available-for-sale
 
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Three Months Ended June 30:
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
 
 
Balance as of April 1, 2014
$
(10.0
)
 
$
(4.5
)
 
$
(14.5
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
15.2

 

 
15.2

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
(1.3
)
 
0.1

 
(1.2
)
Other comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2014
13.9

 
0.1

 
14.0

Balance as of June 30, 2014
$
3.9

 
$
(4.4
)
 
$
(0.5
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of April 1, 2015
$
18.4

 
$
(11.1
)
 
$
7.3

Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications
(20.2
)
 

 
(20.2
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
(1.0
)
 
0.4

 
(0.6
)
Other comprehensive (loss) income for the three months ended June 30, 2015
(21.2
)
 
0.4

 
(20.8
)
Balance as of June 30, 2015
$
(2.8
)
 
$
(10.7
)
 
$
(13.5
)
Six Months Ended June 30:
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of January 1, 2014
$
(28.3
)
 
$
(4.6
)
 
$
(32.9
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
33.7

 

 
33.7

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
(1.5
)
 
0.2

 
(1.3
)
Other comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2014
32.2

 
0.2

 
32.4

Balance as of June 30, 2014
$
3.9

 
$
(4.4
)
 
$
(0.5
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of January 1, 2015
$
8.2

 
$
(11.5
)
 
$
(3.3
)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications
(9.6
)
 

 
(9.6
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
(1.4
)
 
0.8

 
(0.6
)
Other comprehensive (loss) income for the six months ended June 30, 2015
(11.0
)
 
0.8

 
(10.2
)
Balance as of June 30, 2015
$
(2.8
)
 
$
(10.7
)
 
$
(13.5
)

14



The following table shows reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income and the affected line items in the consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
Three months ended
June 30,
 
Six months ended
June 30,
Affected line item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
 
Unrealized gains on investments available-for-sale
$
1.6

 
$
1.9

 
$
2.2

 
$
2.2

Net investment income
 
1.6

 
1.9

 
2.2

 
2.2

Total before tax
 
0.6

 
0.6

 
0.8

 
0.7

Tax expense
 
1.0

 
1.3

 
1.4

 
1.5

Net of tax
Amortization of defined benefit pension items:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      Prior-service cost
(0.1
)
 
(0.1
)
 
(0.2
)
 
(0.2
)
(a)
 Actuarial gains (losses)
(0.6
)
 

 
(1.1
)
 
(0.1
)
(a)
 
(0.7
)
 
(0.1
)
 
(1.3
)
 
(0.3
)
Total before tax
 
(0.3
)
 

 
(0.5
)
 
(0.1
)
Tax benefit
 
(0.4
)
 
(0.1
)
 
(0.8
)
 
(0.2
)
Net of tax
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total reclassifications for the period
$
0.6

 
$
1.2

 
$
0.6

 
$
1.3

Net of tax
_________
(a)
These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and reflects net income divided by the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted earnings per share is based upon the weighted average shares of common stock and dilutive common stock equivalents (this reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options were exercised and restricted stock units ("RSUs") and performance share units ("PSUs") were vested) outstanding during the periods presented.
The inclusion or exclusion of common stock equivalents arising from stock options, RSUs and PSUs in the computation of diluted earnings per share is determined using the treasury stock method. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, 985,000 shares and 1,135,000 shares of dilutive common stock equivalents were outstanding and were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, 968,000 shares and 1,044,000 shares of dilutive common stock equivalents were outstanding and were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share.
For the three months ended June 30, 2015, we had no shares of common stock equivalents that were considered anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, an aggregate of 9,000 shares of common stock equivalents were considered anti-dilutive and were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, an aggregate of 782,000 shares and 786,000 shares, respectively, of common stock equivalents were considered anti-dilutive and were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. Stock options expire at various times through February 2019.
In May 2011, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for the repurchase of up to $300 million of our outstanding common stock (our "stock repurchase program"). On March 8, 2012, our Board of Directors approved a $323.7 million increase to our stock repurchase program and on December 16, 2014, our Board of Directors approved another $257.8 million increase to our stock repurchase program. This latest increase, which when taken together with the remaining authorization at that time, brought our total authorization up to $400 million. As of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015, the remaining authorization under our stock repurchase program was $400.0 million and $306.2 million, respectively. See Note 6 for more information regarding our stock repurchase program.

15



Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We performed our annual impairment test on our goodwill and other intangible assets as of June 30, 2015 for our Western Region Operations reporting unit and also re-evaluated the useful lives of our other intangible assets. No goodwill impairment was identified. We also determined that the estimated useful lives of our other intangible assets properly reflected the current estimated useful lives.
The carrying amount of goodwill by reporting unit is as follows:
 
Western
Region
Operations
 
Total
 
(Dollars in millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2014
$
558.9

 
$
558.9

Balance as of June 30, 2015
$
558.9

 
$
558.9

The intangible assets that continue to be subject to amortization using the straight-line method over their estimated lives are as follows:
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Balance
 
Weighted
Average Life
(in years)
 
(Dollars in millions)
 
 
As of June 30, 2015:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Provider networks
$
41.5

 
$
(37.5
)
 
$
4.0

 
18.9
Customer relationships and other
29.5

 
(23.1
)
 
6.4

 
11.1
 
$
71.0

 
$
(60.6
)
 
$
10.4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of December 31, 2014:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Provider networks
$
41.5

 
$
(36.9
)
 
$
4.6

 
18.9
Customer relationships and other
29.5

 
(22.3
)
 
7.2

 
11.1
 
$
71.0

 
$
(59.2
)
 
$
11.8

 
 
Estimated annual pretax amortization expense for other intangible assets for each of the next five years ending December 31 is as follows (dollars in millions):  
Year
Amount

2015
$
2.8

2016
2.2

2017
2.2

2018
2.1

2019
0.9

Restricted Assets
We and our consolidated subsidiaries are required to set aside certain funds that may only be used for certain purposes pursuant to state regulatory requirements. We have discretion as to whether we invest such funds in cash and cash equivalents or other investments. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the restricted cash and cash equivalents balances totaled $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and are included in other noncurrent assets. Investment securities held by trustees or agencies were $28.2 million and $24.0 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, and are included in investments available-for-sale.

16


Accounting for Certain Provisions of the ACA
Premium-based Fee on Health Insurers    
The ACA mandated significant reforms to various aspects of the U.S. health insurance industry. Among other things, the ACA imposes an annual premium-based fee on health insurers (the "health insurer fee") for each calendar year beginning on or after January 1, 2014 which is not deductible for federal income tax purposes and in many state jurisdictions. The health insurer fee is levied based on a ratio of an insurer's net health insurance premiums written for the previous calendar year compared to the U.S. health insurance industry total. We are required to estimate a liability for our portion of the health insurer fee and record it in full once qualifying insurance coverage is provided in the applicable calendar year in which the fee is payable with a corresponding deferred cost that is amortized ratably to expense over the calendar year that it is payable.
We expect to pay the federal government approximately $232.6 million in September 2015 for our portion of the 2015 health insurer fee based on 2014 premiums in accordance with the ACA. We have recorded a liability for this fee in other current liabilities with an offsetting deferred cost in other current assets in our consolidated financial statements. In September 2014, we paid the federal government $141.4 million for our portion of the health insurer fee based on 2013 premiums. Our general and administrative expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 include amortization of the deferred cost of $58.5 million and $116.3 million, respectively. Our general and administrative expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 include amortization of the deferred cost of $37.8 million and $74.1 million, respectively. The remaining deferred cost asset was approximately $116.3 million as of June 30, 2015 and $0 as of December 31, 2014.
Public Health Insurance Exchanges
The ACA requires the establishment of state-based, state and federal partnership or federally facilitated health insurance exchanges ("exchanges") where individuals and small groups may purchase health insurance coverage under regulations established by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS"). We currently participate in exchanges in Arizona and California. Effective January 1, 2014, the ACA includes permanent and temporary premium stabilization provisions for transitional reinsurance, permanent risk adjustment, and temporary risk corridors (collectively referred to as the "3Rs"), which are applicable to those insurers participating inside, and in some cases outside, of the exchanges.
Member Related Components
Member Premium—We receive a monthly premium from members. The member premium, which is fixed for the entire plan year, is recognized evenly over the contract period and reported as part of health plan services premium revenue.
Premium Subsidy—For qualifying low-income members, HHS will reimburse us, on the member’s behalf, some or all of the monthly member premium depending on the member’s income level in relation to the Federal Poverty Level. We recognize the premium subsidy evenly over the contract period and report it as part of health plan services premium revenue.
Cost Sharing Subsidy—For qualifying low-income members, HHS will reimburse us, on the member’s behalf, some or all of a member’s cost sharing amounts (e.g., deductible, co-pay/coinsurance). The amount paid for the member by HHS is dependent on the member’s income level in relation to the Federal Poverty Level. The Cost Sharing Subsidy offsets health care costs when incurred. We record a liability if the Cost Sharing Subsidy is paid in advance or a receivable if incurred health care costs exceed the Cost Sharing Subsidy received to date.
3Rs: Reinsurance, Risk Adjustment and Risk Corridor
Our accounting estimates are impacted as a result of the provisions of the ACA, including the 3Rs. The substantial influx of previously uninsured individuals into the new health insurance exchanges under the ACA could make it more difficult for health insurers, including us, to establish pricing accurately, at least during the early years of the exchanges. The 3Rs are intended to mitigate some of the risks around pricing and lack of information surrounding the previously uninsured. Estimating the amounts for the 3Rs involve complex calculations, assumptions and judgments. Our estimation process relies in part on data provided by participating insurers, including us, and also requires interpretation and application of existing ACA laws, regulations and guidance, including with respect to regulations related to treatment of income taxes in calculating risk corridors. How the certain laws and regulations are interpreted and applied may impact the estimation process, which impact may be material. Accordingly, we will experience premium adjustments to our health plan services premium revenues and health plan services expenses based on changes to our estimated amounts related to the 3Rs until we receive the final reconciliation and settlement amount from HHS. Such estimated amounts may differ materially from actual amounts ultimately received or paid under the provisions, which may have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

17


Reinsurance—The transitional reinsurance program requires us to make reinsurance contributions for calendar years 2014 through 2016 to a state or HHS established reinsurance entity based on a national contribution rate per covered member as determined by HHS. While all commercial medical plans, including self-funded plans, are required to fund the reinsurance entity, only fully-insured non-grandfathered plans in the individual commercial market will be eligible for recoveries if individual claims exceed a specified threshold. Accordingly, we account for transitional reinsurance contributions associated with all commercial medical health plans other than non-grandfathered individual plans as an assessment in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statement of income and recorded $9.0 million and $10.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and recorded $18.1 million and $28.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We account for contributions made by individual commercial plans which are subject to recoveries as contra-health plan services premium revenue and recorded $3.9 million and $7.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and recorded $7.5 million and $7.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We account for any recoveries as contra-health plan services expense in our consolidated statements of income. Reinsurance assessments and recoveries are classified as current or long-term receivable or payable based on the timing of expected settlement.
Risk Adjustment—The risk adjustment provision applies to individual and small group business both within and outside the exchange and requires measurement of the relative health status risk of each insurer’s pool of insured enrollees in a given market. The risk adjustment provision then operates to transfer funds from insurers whose pools of insured enrollees have lower-than-average risk scores to those insurers whose pools have greater-than-average risk scores. Our estimate for the risk adjustment incorporates our risk scores by state and market relative to the market average using data provided by the participating insurers and available information about the HHS model. This information is consistent with our knowledge and understanding of market conditions.
As part of our ongoing estimation process, we consider information as it becomes available at interim dates along with our actuarially determined expectations, and we update our estimates incorporating such information as appropriate.
We estimate and recognize adjustments to our health plan services premium revenue for the risk adjustment provision by projecting our ultimate premium for the calendar year. Such estimated calendar year amounts are recognized ratably during the year and are revised each period to reflect current experience. We record receivables and/or payables and classify the amounts as current or long-term in the consolidated balance sheets based on the timing of expected settlement.
Risk Corridor—The temporary risk corridor program will be in place for three years and applies to individual and small group business operating both inside and outside of the exchanges. The risk corridor provisions limit health insurers' gains and losses by comparing allowable medical costs to a target amount, each defined/prescribed by HHS, and sharing the risk for allowable costs with the federal government. Variances from the target exceeding certain thresholds may result in HHS making additional payments to us or require us to make payments to HHS.
We estimate and recognize adjustments to our health plan services premium revenue for the risk corridor provision by projecting our ultimate premium for the calendar year. Such estimated calendar year amounts are recognized ratably during the year and are revised each period to reflect current experience, including changes in risk adjustment and reinsurance recoverables. We record receivables and/or payables and classify the amounts as current or long-term in the consolidated balance sheets based on the timing of expected settlement.
HHS recognizes, in both final regulations and guidance, it is obligated to make the risk corridors program payments without regard to budget neutrality. Although HHS anticipates the program will be budget neutral, the ACA requires HHS to make full payments to those issuers with risk corridors ratios above 103 percent. Additionally, HHS states in final regulations and guidance that if the program’s collections, including any potential carryover from prior years, are insufficient to satisfy its payment obligations, the agency will use other sources of funding to meet its payment obligations, subject to the availability of appropriations. If corridor collections are insufficient in 2014, HHS explains that it shall fulfill its obligations for the 2014 benefit year by using funds collected for the 2015 benefit year prior to making payments on 2015 obligations.

18


The following table presents the assets and liabilities related to the 3Rs as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
 
 
June 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
Other receivables:
 
(Dollars in millions)
Reinsurance
 
$
214.2

 
$
234.0

Risk adjustment
 
53.5

 
81.0

Risk corridor
 
92.6

 

 
 
 
 
 
Other noncurrent assets:
 
 
 
 
Reinsurance
 
86.4

 

Risk adjustment
 
34.4

 

Risk corridor
 
86.3

 
90.4

 
 
 
 
 
Accounts payable and other liabilities:
 
 
 
 
Risk adjustment
 
132.3

 
153.4

 
 
 
 
 
Other noncurrent liabilities:
 
 
 
 
Risk adjustment
 
95.0

 

Risk corridor
 

 
3.6

 
 
 
 
 
Net Receivable (Payable) Balance:
 
 
 
 
Risk adjustment
 
$
(139.4
)
 
$
(72.4
)
Risk corridor
 
178.9

 
86.8

Reinsurance
 
300.6

 
234.0

 
 
 
 
 

The following table presents the changes in our balances related to the 3Rs during the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
Net Receivable/(Payable) Balance as of
March 31, 2015 and 2014
 
Change in Estimates Related to Prior Year
 
Current Estimates
 
Net Receivable/(Payable) Balance as of
June 30, 2015 and 2014
 
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
 
Three months ended June 30, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk adjustment
$
(144.5
)
 
$
34.7

 
$
(29.6
)
 
$
(139.4
)
Risk corridor
143.4

 
(19.8
)
 
55.3

 
178.9

Reinsurance
273.4

 
(23.8
)
 
51.0

 
300.6

Three months ended June 30, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk adjustment
$

 
$

 
$
(30.1
)
 
$
(30.1
)
Risk corridor
8.7

 

 
18.6

 
27.3

Reinsurance
33.1

 

 
77.5

 
110.6


19


The following table presents the changes in our balances related to the 3Rs during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
Net Receivable/(Payable) Balance as of
December 31, 2014 and 2013
 
Change in Estimates Related to Prior Year
 
Current Estimates
 
Net Receivable/(Payable) Balance as of
June 30, 2015 and 2014
 
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
 
Six months ended June 30, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk adjustment
$
(72.4
)
 
$
(6.4
)
 
$
(60.6
)
 
$
(139.4
)
Risk corridor
86.8

 
5.9

 
86.2

 
178.9

Reinsurance
234.0

 
(19.8
)
 
86.4

 
300.6

Six months ended June 30, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk adjustment
$

 
$

 
$
(30.1
)
 
$
(30.1
)
Risk corridor

 

 
27.3

 
27.3

Reinsurance

 

 
110.6

 
110.6


The change in estimates related to the prior year reduced our pretax income by $(8.9) million and $(20.3) million for three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.
The final reconciliation and settlement with HHS of the premium and cost sharing subsidies and the amounts related to the 3Rs for the current year will be completed in the following year with HHS. The risk adjustment and reinsurance amounts for the benefit year 2014 reflect the final reconciliation by HHS. We expect to pay and receive risk adjustment and reinsurance amounts for 2014 during the third quarter of 2015. We expect to receive the estimate amount for the 2014 risk corridor amount from HHS on or about August 14, 2015.
Section 1202 of ACA
Section 1202 of the ACA mandates increases in Medicaid payment rates for primary care in calendar years 2013 and 2014. The final rule has been in effect since January 1, 2013. The provisions of section 1202 impact our 1.7 million Medi-Cal members in California and 76,000 Medicaid members in Arizona. DHCS, the agency that regulates the Medi-Cal program, initially implemented a reimbursement methodology with no underwriting risk to the managed care plans ("MCPs") in 2013. Subsequently, DHCS changed the reimbursement methodology during the second quarter of 2014, and this change transferred full underwriting risk to the MCPs.
For the periods prior to this reimbursement methodology change, i.e., the year ended December 31, 2013 and the three months ended March 31, 2014, we accounted for the provisions of section 1202 on an administrative services only basis since it transferred no underwriting risk to the MCPs, and recorded the receipts and payments on a net basis.
Following the change in reimbursement methodology, we have full underwriting risk for 2013, including both utilization and unit cost risk. Accordingly, for the second quarter of 2014, with respect to our Medi-Cal business, we had:
Reversed $7.9 million previously recorded as administrative services fees and other income in 2013 and for the three months ended March 31, 2014.
Recorded payments on a grossed-up basis by recording Medi-Cal payments received as premium revenue and estimated Medi-Cal claim payments as health care costs (incurred claims), each via retroactive adjustments to premium revenues and health care costs.
Recorded retrospective premium revenue adjustments based upon the state settlement agreement (see Note 2 - "Health Plan Services Revenue Recognition" above).

20


The financial statement impact of the section 1202 reimbursement methodology change is summarized in the table below.
 
Recorded In
 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
No Risk
 
No Risk
 
Full Risk
Health plan services premiums
$
4.4

 
$

 
$
154.7

Health plan services expenses

 

 
144.0

General and administrative expenses
4.4

 

 

Administrative services fees and other income
6.5

 
1.4

 
(7.9
)
Pretax income
$
6.5

 
$
1.4

 
$
2.8

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncement
In May 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-09, “Financial Services—Insurance (Topic 944), Disclosures about Short-Duration Contracts (“ASU 2015-09”). ASU 2015-09 will apply to all insurance entities that issue short-term duration contracts. Insurance entities will be required to present additional disclosures about the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses. For health insurance claims, ASU 2015-09 will require the disclosure of the total IBNR liabilities plus expected development on reported claims included in the liability for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses. For liabilities for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses that are reported at present value, additional disclosures will be required, including the aggregate amount of discount for the time value of money deducted to derive the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses, for each period presented in the statement of financial position, and the amount of interest accretion recognized for each period presented in the statement of income. ASU 2015-09 will become effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. We do not expect this new guidance to have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
3. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
On November 2, 2014, we signed a definitive seven-year Master Services Agreement with Cognizant to provide consulting, technology and administrative services to us in the following areas: claims management, membership and benefits configuration, customer contact center services, information technology, quality assurance, appeals and grievance services and non-clinical medical management support. In addition, we have entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Cognizant for the sale of certain of our software system assets to Cognizant for $50 million. The closing of the Cognizant Transaction and commencement of services thereunder on the BPaaS Services Commencement Date (as defined in the Master Services Agreement), is subject to receipt of required regulatory approvals, and the closing of the related Asset Sale is scheduled for the BPaaS Services Commencement Date. See Note 11 for additional information regarding our subsequent amendment to the Master Services Agreement with Cognizant.

21



We have determined that the sale of these software system assets constitutes a sale of a business as defined under GAAP, and the requirements to classify these software system assets as held-for-sale were met as of September 30, 2014. Assets held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying value or fair value less cost to sell. Accordingly, we have classified $50.0 million in assets as assets held for sale as of December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015. The following table presents the major classes of assets included in this amount (dollars in millions):
 
 
Assets Classified as Held for Sale during the year ended December 31, 2014
 
Impairment Loss for the year ended December 31, 2014
 
Assets Held for Sale as of
December 31, 2014
 
Assets Classified as Held for Sale during the six months ended June 30, 2015
 
Impairment Loss for the six months ended June 30, 2015
 
Assets Held for Sale as of
June 30, 2015
Property and equipment, net
 
$
130.2

 
$
(80.2
)
 
$
50.0

 
$
1.9

 
$
(1.9
)
 
$
50.0

Goodwill allocated to sale of business
 
7.0

 
(7.0
)
 

 

 

 

Assets held for sale
 
$
137.2

 
$
(87.2
)
 
$
50.0

 
$
1.9

 
$ (
1.9
)
 
$
50.0

In connection with the pending sale, we have assessed the recoverability of goodwill and our long-lived assets, including property and equipment. As a result, in the year ended December 31, 2014, we recorded $87.2 million in total asset impairments. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we recorded $0 and $1.9 million, respectively, in asset impairments for additional property and equipment classified as assets held for sale (see Note 8). Such property and equipment consist of software system assets.
4. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Our reportable segments are comprised of Western Region Operations and Government Contracts. Our Western Region Operations reportable segment includes the operations of our commercial, Medicare, Medicaid and dual eligibles health plans, our health and life insurance companies, our pharmaceutical services subsidiaries and certain operations of our behavioral health subsidiaries. These operations are conducted primarily in California, Arizona, Oregon and Washington. Our Government Contracts reportable segment includes government-sponsored managed care and administrative services contracts through the TRICARE program, the Department of Defense Military and Family Life Counseling program, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Patient Centered Community Care program and certain other health care-related government contracts. In connection with the Cognizant Transaction, we reviewed our reportable segments and determined that no changes to our reportable segments were necessary. See Note 3 for additional information regarding the Cognizant Transaction.
The financial results of our reportable segments are reviewed on a monthly basis by our chief operating decision maker ("CODM"). We continuously monitor our reportable segments to ensure they reflect how our CODM manages our company.
We evaluate performance and allocate resources based on segment pretax income and net income. Our assets are managed centrally and viewed by our CODM on a consolidated basis; therefore, they are not allocated to our segments and our segments are not evaluated for performance based on assets. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 2), except that intersegment transactions are not eliminated.
We also have a Corporate/Other segment that is not a business operating segment. It is added to our reportable segments to provide a reconciliation to our consolidated results. The Corporate/Other segment includes costs that are excluded from the calculation of segment pretax income and net income because they are not managed within the segments and are not directly identified with a particular operating segment. Accordingly, these costs are not included in the performance evaluation of our reportable segments by our CODM. In addition, certain charges, including but not limited to those related to our continuing efforts to address scale issues as well as asset impairments, are reported as part of Corporate/Other.

22



Our segment information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
 
Western Region
Operations
 
 
Government
Contracts
 
Corporate/Other/
Eliminations
 
 
Total
 
(Dollars in millions)
Three months ended June 30, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues from external sources
$
4,022.6

 
$
141.0

 
$

 
$
4,163.6

Intersegment revenues
3.4

 

 
(3.4
)
 

Segment pretax income (loss)
154.7

 
3.8

 
(26.4
)
 
132.1

Segment net income (loss)
72.4

 
2.2

 
(16.2
)
 
58.4

Three months ended June 30, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues from external sources
$
3,267.3

 
$
154.1

 
$

 
$
3,421.4

Intersegment revenues
3.1

 

 
(3.1
)
 

Segment pretax income (loss)
80.7

 
21.4

 
(3.3
)
 
98.8

Segment net income (loss)
37.8

 
12.5

 
70.6

 
120.9

Six months ended June 30, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues from external sources
$
7,757.8

 
$
295.7

 
$

 
$
8,053.5

Intersegment revenues
6.8

 

 
(6.8
)
 

Segment pretax income (loss)
256.7

 
16.8

 
(73.7
)
 
199.8

Segment net income (loss)
123.1

 
9.8

 
(44.5
)
 
88.4

Six months ended June 30, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues from external sources
$
6,162.1

 
$
298.2

 
$

 
$
6,460.3

Intersegment revenues
6.1

 

 
(6.1
)
 

Segment pretax income (loss)
133.7

 
34.5

 
(7.4
)
 
160.8

Segment net income (loss)
61.4

 
20.1

 
68.1

 
149.6

Our health plan services premium revenue by line of business for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
(Dollars in millions)
Commercial premium revenue
$
1,412.9

 
$
1,377.5

 
$
2,745.9

 
$
2,641.6

Medicare premium revenue
782.4

 
757.2

 
1,551.3

 
1,512.4

Medicaid premium revenue
1,673.1

 
1,121.9

 
3,144.4

 
1,983.9

Dual Eligibles premium revenue
135.0

 
5.3

 
282.6

 
5.3

Total health plan services premiums
$
4,003.4

 
$
3,261.9

 
$
7,724.2

 
$
6,143.2

5. INVESTMENTS
Investments classified as available-for-sale, which consist primarily of debt securities, are stated at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are excluded from earnings and reported as other comprehensive income, net of income tax effects. The cost of investments sold is determined in accordance with the specific identification method, and realized gains and losses are included in net investment income. We periodically assess our investments available-for-sale for other-than-temporary impairment. Any such other-than-temporary impairment loss is recognized as a realized loss, which is recorded through earnings, if related to credit losses.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we recognized no losses from other-than-temporary impairments of our cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments.
We classified $6.5 million and $4.6 million as investments available-for-sale-noncurrent as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, because we did not intend to sell and we believed it may take longer than one year for

23



such impaired securities to recover. This classification does not affect the marketability or the valuation of the investments, which are reflected at their market values as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains and losses, and fair value of our current investments available-for-sale and our investments available-for-sale-noncurrent, after giving effect to other-than-temporary impairments, were as follows:  
 
 
 
June 30, 2015
 
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
 
Carrying
Value
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
Current:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset-backed securities
 
$
623.7

 
$
2.3

 
$
(3.6
)
 
$
622.4

U.S. government and agencies
 
28.2

 

 

 
28.2

Obligations of states and other political subdivisions
 
979.0

 
10.0

 
(9.0
)
 
980.0

Corporate debt securities
 
743.9

 
2.6

 
(5.6
)
 
740.9

 
 
$
2,374.8

 
$
14.9

 
$
(18.2
)
 
$
2,371.5

Noncurrent:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset-backed securities
 
$
0.6

 
$

 
$
(0.2
)
 
$
0.4

Obligations of states and other political subdivisions
 
1.7

 

 
(0.2
)
 
1.5

Corporate debt securities
 
5.3

 

 
(0.7
)
 
4.6

 
 
$
7.6

 
$

 
$
(1.1
)
 
$
6.5

 
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
 
Carrying
Value
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
Current:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset-backed securities
 
$
437.2

 
$
2.6

 
$
(1.9
)
 
$
437.9

U.S. government and agencies
 
36.5

 

 

 
36.5

Obligations of states and other political subdivisions
 
716.7

 
17.2

 
(1.7
)
 
732.2

Corporate debt securities
 
587.0

 
2.7

 
(5.3
)
 
584.4

 
 
$
1,777.4

 
$
22.5

 
$
(8.9
)
 
$
1,791.0

Noncurrent:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset-backed securities
 
$
0.8

 
$

 
$
(0.2
)
 
$
0.6

Corporate debt securities
 
4.7

 

 
(0.7
)
 
4.0

 
 
$
5.5

 
$

 
$
(0.9
)
 
$
4.6



24



As of June 30, 2015, the contractual maturities of our current investments available-for-sale and our investments available-for-sale-noncurrent were as follows:
 
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Estimated
Fair Value
Current:
 
(Dollars in millions)
Due in one year or less
 
$
41.7

 
$
41.8

Due after one year through five years
 
538.3

 
538.1

Due after five years through ten years
 
642.8

 
640.9

Due after ten years
 
528.3

 
528.3

Asset-backed securities
 
623.7

 
622.4

Total current investments available-for-sale
 
$
2,374.8

 
$
2,371.5

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Estimated
Fair Value
Noncurrent:
 
(Dollars in millions)
Due after five years through ten years
 
7.0

 
6.1

Asset-backed securities
 
0.6

 
0.4

Total noncurrent investments available-for-sale
 
$
7.6

 
$
6.5


Proceeds from sales of investments available-for-sale during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 were $447.9 million and $541.4 million, respectively. Gross realized gains and losses totaled $4.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2015, and $5.2 million and $3.0 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Proceeds from sales of investments available-for-sale during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 were $125.8 million and $192.3 million, respectively. Gross realized gains and losses totaled $2.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2014, and $3.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
The following tables show our investments’ fair values and gross unrealized losses for individual securities that have been in a continuous loss position through June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. These investments are interest-yielding debt securities of varying maturities. We have determined that the unrealized loss position for these securities is primarily due to market volatility. Generally, in a rising interest rate environment, the estimated fair value of fixed income securities would be expected to decrease; conversely, in a decreasing interest rate environment, the estimated fair value of fixed income securities would be expected to increase. These securities also may be negatively impacted by illiquidity in the market.
The following table shows our current investments' fair values and gross unrealized losses for individual securities that have been in a continuous loss position through June 30, 2015:
 
 
Less than 12 Months
 
12 Months or More
 
Total
 
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
Asset-backed securities
 
$
360.8

 
$
(3.1
)
 
$
40.9

 
$
(0.5
)
 
$
401.7

 
$
(3.6
)
U.S. government and agencies
 
1.8

 

 

 

 
1.8

 

Obligations of states and other political subdivisions
 
503.0

 
(8.3
)
 
19.4

 
(0.7
)
 
522.4

 
(9.0
)
Corporate debt securities
 
414.6

 
(5.0
)
 
22.9

 
(0.6
)
 
437.5

 
(5.6
)
 
 
$
1,280.2

 
$
(16.4
)
 
$
83.2

 
$
(1.8
)
 
$
1,363.4

 
$
(18.2
)
 

25



The following table shows our noncurrent investments' fair values and gross unrealized losses for individual securities that have been in a continuous loss position through June 30, 2015:
 
 
Less than 12 Months
 
12 Months or More
 
Total
 
 
Fair Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
Asset-backed securities
 
$

 
$

 
$
0.4

 
$
(0.2
)
 
$
0.4

 
$
(0.2
)
Obligations of states and other political subdivisions
 

 

 
1.5

 
(0.2
)
 
1.5

 
(0.2
)
Corporate debt securities
 
4.4

 
(0.7
)
 
0.2

 

 
4.6

 
(0.7
)
 
 
$
4.4

 
$
(0.7
)
 
$
2.1

 
$
(0.4
)
 
$
6.5

 
$
(1.1
)

The following table shows the number of our individual securities-current that have been in a continuous loss position through June 30, 2015:
 
 
Less than
12 Months
 
12 Months
or More
 
Total
Asset-backed securities
 
193

 
32

 
225

U.S. government and agencies
 
2

 

 
2

Obligations of states and other political subdivisions
 
344

 
13

 
357

Corporate debt securities
 
364

 
25

 
389

 
 
903

 
70

 
973


The following table shows the number of our individual securities-noncurrent that have been in a continuous loss position through June 30, 2015:
 
 
Less than
12 Months
 
12 Months
or More
 
Total
Asset-backed securities
 

 
1

 
1

Obligations of states and other political subdivisions
 

 
1

 
1

Corporate debt securities
 
8

 
1

 
9

 
 
8

 
3

 
11


The following table shows our current investments’ fair values and gross unrealized losses for individual securities that have been in a continuous loss position through December 31, 2014:
 
 
Less than 12 Months
 
12 Months or More
 
Total
 
 
Fair Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
Asset-backed securities
 
$
149.3

 
$
(0.5
)
 
$
112.5

 
$
(1.4
)
 
$
261.8

 
$
(1.9
)
U.S. government and agencies
 
20.7

 

 

 

 
20.7

 

Obligations of states and other political subdivisions
 
37.3

 
(0.1
)
 
104.8

 
(1.6
)
 
142.1

 
(1.7
)
Corporate debt securities
 
299.1

 
(3.9
)
 
56.0

 
(1.4
)
 
355.1

 
(5.3
)
 
 
$
506.4

 
$
(4.5
)
 
$
273.3

 
$
(4.4
)
 
$
779.7

 
$
(8.9
)

26




The following table shows our noncurrent investments' fair value and gross unrealized losses for our individual securities that have been in a continuous loss position through December 31, 2014:
 
 
Less than 12 Months
 
12 Months or More
 
Total
 
 
Fair Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
Asset-backed securities
 
$

 
$

 
$
0.6

 
$
(0.2
)
 
$
0.6

 
$
(0.2
)
Corporate debt securities
 
4.0

 
(0.7
)
 

 

 
4.0

 
(0.7
)
 
 
$
4.0

 
$
(0.7
)
 
$
0.6

 
$
(0.2
)
 
$
4.6

 
$
(0.9
)
6. STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On May 2, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized our stock repurchase program pursuant to which a total of $300 million of our outstanding common stock could be repurchased. On March 8, 2012, our Board of Directors approved a $323.7 million increase to our stock repurchase program and on December 16, 2014, our Board of Directors approved another $257.8 million increase to our stock repurchase program. This latest increase, when taken together with the remaining authorization at that time, brought our total authorization up to $400.0 million.
Subject to the approval of our Board of Directors, we may repurchase our common stock under our stock repurchase program from time to time in privately negotiated transactions, through accelerated stock repurchase programs or open market transactions, including pursuant to a trading plan in accordance with Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The timing of any repurchases and the actual number of shares of stock repurchased will depend on a variety of factors, including the stock price, corporate and regulatory requirements, restrictions under the Company’s debt obligations, and other market and economic conditions. Our stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, we made no share repurchases under our stock repurchase program. As of December 31, 2014, the remaining authorization under our stock repurchase program was $400.0 million. During the three months ended June 30, 2015, we made no share repurchases and during the six months ended June 30, 2015, we repurchased approximately 1.7 million shares of our common stock for aggregate consideration of $93.8 million under our stock repurchase program. The remaining authorization under our stock repurchase program as of June 30, 2015 was $306.2 million.
7. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Revolving Credit Facility
In October 2011, we entered into a $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility due in October 2016, which includes a $400 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit and a $50 million sublimit for swing line loans (which sublimits may be increased in connection with any increase in the credit facility described below). In addition, we have the ability from time to time to increase the credit facility by up to an additional $200 million in the aggregate, subject to the receipt of additional commitments. As of June 30, 2015, $210.0 million was outstanding under our revolving credit facility, and the maximum amount available for borrowing under the revolving credit facility was $383.5 million (see "—Letters of Credit" below).
Amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either (a) the base rate (which is a rate per annum equal to the greatest of (i) the federal funds rate plus one-half of one percent, (ii) Bank of America, N.A.’s “prime rate” and (iii) the Eurodollar Rate (as such term is defined in the credit facility) for a one-month interest period plus one percent) plus an applicable margin ranging from 45 to 105 basis points or (b) the Eurodollar Rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 145 to 205 basis points. The applicable margins are based on our consolidated leverage ratio, as specified in the credit facility, and are subject to adjustment following the Company’s delivery of a compliance certificate for each fiscal quarter.
Our revolving credit facility includes, among other customary terms and conditions, limitations (subject to specified exclusions) on our and our subsidiaries’ ability to incur debt; create liens; engage in certain mergers, consolidations and acquisitions; sell or transfer assets; enter into agreements that restrict the ability to pay dividends or make or repay loans or advances; make investments, loans, and advances; engage in transactions with affiliates; and make dividends. In addition, we are required to be in compliance at the end of each fiscal quarter with a specified

27



consolidated leverage ratio and consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio. As of June 30, 2015, we were in compliance with all covenants under the revolving credit facility.
Our revolving credit facility contains customary events of default, including nonpayment of principal or other amounts when due; breach of covenants; inaccuracy of representations and warranties; cross-default and/or cross-acceleration to other indebtedness of the Company or our subsidiaries in excess of $50 million; certain ERISA-related events; noncompliance by the Company or any of our subsidiaries with any material term or provision of the HMO Regulations or Insurance Regulations (as each such term is defined in the credit facility) in a manner that could reasonably be expected to result in a material adverse effect; certain voluntary and involuntary bankruptcy events; inability to pay debts; undischarged, uninsured judgments greater than $50 million against us and/or our subsidiaries that are not stayed within 60 days; actual or asserted invalidity of any loan document; and a change of control. If an event of default occurs and is continuing under the revolving credit facility, the lenders thereunder may, among other things, terminate their obligations under the facility and require us to repay all amounts owed thereunder.
Letters of Credit
Pursuant to the terms of our revolving credit facility, we can obtain letters of credit in an aggregate amount of $400 million and the maximum amount available for borrowing is reduced by the dollar amount of any outstanding letters of credit. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had outstanding letters of credit of $6.5 million and $8.6 million, respectively, resulting in a maximum amount available for borrowing of $383.5 million and $491.4 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, no amounts had been drawn on any of these letters of credit.
Senior Notes
In 2007, we issued $400 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.375% Senior Notes due 2017 ("Senior Notes"). The indenture governing the Senior Notes limits our ability to incur certain liens, or consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets. In the event of the occurrence of both (1) a change of control of Health Net, Inc. and (2) a below investment grade rating by any two of Fitch, Inc., Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services within a specified period, we will be required to make an offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. As of June 30, 2015, no default or event of default had occurred under the indenture governing the Senior Notes.
 The Senior Notes may be redeemed in whole at any time or in part from time to time, prior to maturity at our option, at a redemption price equal to the greater of:
100% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes then outstanding to be redeemed; or
the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the Senior Notes to be redeemed (not including any portion of such payments of interest accrued to the date of redemption) discounted to the date of redemption on a semiannual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the applicable treasury rate plus 30 basis points
plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount being redeemed to the redemption date.
Each of the following will be an Event of Default under the indenture governing the Senior Notes:
failure to pay interest for 30 days after the date payment is due and payable; provided that an extension of an interest payment period by us in accordance with the terms of the Senior Notes shall not constitute a failure to pay interest;
failure to pay principal or premium, if any, on any note when due, either at maturity, upon any redemption, by declaration or otherwise;
failure to perform any other covenant or agreement in the notes or indenture for a period of 60 days after notice that performance was required;
(A) our failure or the failure of any of our subsidiaries to pay indebtedness for money we borrowed or any of our subsidiaries borrowed in an aggregate principal amount of at least $50 million, at the later of final maturity and the expiration of any related applicable grace period and such defaulted payment shall not have been made, waived or extended within 30 days after notice or (B) acceleration of the maturity of indebtedness for money we borrowed or any of our subsidiaries borrowed in an aggregate principal amount of at least $50 million, if that acceleration results from a default under the instrument giving rise

28



to or securing such indebtedness for money borrowed and such indebtedness has not been discharged in full or such acceleration has not been rescinded or annulled within 30 days after notice; or
events in bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of our Company.
Our Senior Notes payable balances were $399.6 million as of June 30, 2015 and $399.5 million as of December 31, 2014.
8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
We record certain assets and liabilities at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets and categorize them based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value and the level of market price observability. We also estimate fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased or in those circumstances that indicate when a transaction is not orderly.
Investments measured and reported at fair value using Level inputs are classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:
Level 1—Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical investments as of the reporting date. The types of investments included in Level 1 include U.S. Treasury securities and listed equities. We do not adjust the quoted price for these investments, even in situations where we hold a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.
Level 2—Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date, and fair value is determined through the use of models and/or other valuation methodologies that are based on an income approach. Examples include, but are not limited to, multidimensional relational model, option adjusted spread model, and various matrices. Specific pricing inputs include quoted prices for similar securities in both active and non-active markets, other observable inputs such as interest rates, yield curve volatilities, default rates, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by other observable market data. Investments that are generally included in this category include asset-backed securities, corporate bonds and loans, and state and municipal bonds.
Level 3—Pricing inputs are unobservable for the investment and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation using assumptions that market participants would use, including assumptions for risk. Level 3 includes an embedded contractual derivative asset and/or liability held by the Company estimated at fair value. Significant inputs used in the derivative valuation model include the estimated growth in Health Net health care expenditures and estimated growth in national health care expenditures. The growth in these expenditures was modeled using a Monte Carlo simulation approach.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the investment.

29



The following tables present information about our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by us to determine such fair value (dollars in millions):
 
Level 1
 
Level 2-current
 
Level 2-
noncurrent
 
Level 3
 
Total
As of June 30, 2015:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
756.8

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
756.8

Investments—available-for-sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset-backed debt securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
$

 
$
242.2

 
$

 
$

 
$
242.2

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 
215.5

 
0.4

 

 
215.9

Other asset-backed securities

 
164.7

 

 

 
164.7

U.S. government and agencies:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury securities
28.2

 

 

 

 
28.2

U.S. Agency securities

 

 

 

 

Obligations of states and other political subdivisions

 
980.0

 
1.5

 

 
981.5

Corporate debt securities

 
740.9

 
4.6

 

 
745.5

Total investments at fair value
$
28.2

 
$
2,343.3

 
$
6.5

 
$

 
$
2,378.0

Embedded contractual derivative

 

 

 
9.5

 
9.5

Total assets at fair value
$
785.0

 
$
2,343.3

 
$
6.5

 
$
9.5

 
$
3,144.3

As of June 30, 2015:
Level 3
 
Total
Liability:
 
 
 
Embedded contractual derivative
9.8

 
9.8

Total liability at fair value
9.8

 
9.8


 
Level 1
 
Level 2-current
 
Level 2-
noncurrent
 
Level 3
 
Total
As of December 31, 2014:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
869.1

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
869.1

Investments—available-for-sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asset-backed debt securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential mortgage-backed securities
$

 
$
210.9

 
$

 
$

 
$
210.9

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 
145.6

 
0.6

 

 
146.2

Other asset-backed securities

 
81.4

 

 

 
81.4

U.S. government and agencies:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury securities
36.5

 

 

 

 
36.5

U.S. Agency securities

 

 

 

 

Obligations of states and other political subdivisions

 
732.2

 

 

 
732.2

Corporate debt securities

 
584.4

 
4.0

 

 
588.4

Total investments at fair value
$
36.5

 
$
1,754.5

 
$
4.6

 
$

 
$
1,795.6

Embedded contractual derivative

 

 

 
10.0

 
10.0

Total assets at fair value
$
905.6

 
$
1,754.5

 
$
4.6

 
$
10.0

 
$
2,674.7


30



As of December 31, 2014:
Level 3
 
Total
Liability:
 
 
 
Embedded contractual derivative
$
2.6

 
$
2.6

Total liability at fair value
$
2.6

 
$
2.6

We had no transfers between Levels 1 and 2 of financial assets or liabilities that are fair valued on a recurring basis during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. In determining when transfers between levels are recognized, our accounting policy is to recognize the transfers based on the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer.
The changes in the balances of Level 3 financial assets for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows (dollars in millions):
 
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
Embedded Contractual Derivative
 
State-Sponsored Health Plans Settlement Account Deficit
 
Total
 
Embedded Contractual Derivative
 
State-Sponsored Health Plans Settlement Account Deficit
 
Total
Opening balance
 
$
9.5

 
$

 
$
9.5

 
$
11.4

 
$
50.0

 
$
61.4

Transfers into Level 3
 

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total gains or losses for the period:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized in net income
 

 

 

 
1.9

 
(40.4
)
 
(38.5
)
Unrealized in accumulated other comprehensive income
 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases, issues, sales and settlements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases/additions
 

 

 

 

 

 

Issues
 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales
 

 

 

 

 

 

Settlements
 

 

 

 

 

 

Closing balance
 
$
9.5

 
$

 
$
9.5

 
$
13.3

 
$
9.6

 
$
22.9

Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income for assets held at the end of the reporting period
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$


31



The changes in the balances of Level 3 financial assets for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows (dollars in millions):
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
Embedded Contractual Derivative
 
State-Sponsored Health Plans Settlement Account Deficit
 
Total
 
Embedded Contractual Derivative
 
State-Sponsored Health Plans Settlement Account Deficit
 
Total
Opening balance
 
$
10.0

 
$

 
$
10.0

 
$
7.2

 
$
62.9

 
$
70.1

Transfers into Level 3
 

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total gains or losses for the period:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized in net income
 
(0.5
)
 

 
(0.5
)
 
6.1

 
(53.3
)
 
(47.2
)
Unrealized in accumulated other comprehensive income
 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases, issues, sales and settlements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases/additions
 

 

 

 

 

 

Issues
 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales
 

 

 

 

 

 

Settlements
 

 

 

 

 

 

Closing balance
 
$
9.5

 
$

 
$
9.5

 
$
13.3

 
$
9.6

 
$
22.9

Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income for assets held at the end of the reporting period
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

    










32



The changes in the balances of Level 3 financial liability for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 were as follows (dollars in millions):
 
Three months ended June 30, 2015
 
Six months ended June 30, 2015
 
Embedded Contractual Derivative
Opening balance
$
3.3

 
$
2.6

Transfers into Level 3

 

Transfers out of Level 3

 

Total gains or losses for the period:
 
 
 
Realized in net income
6.5

 
7.2

Unrealized in accumulated other comprehensive income

 

Purchases, issues, sales and settlements:
 
 
 
Purchases

 

Issues

 

Sales

 

Settlements

 

Closing balance
$
9.8

 
$
9.8


We had no financial liabilities fair valued on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2014.
As of December 31, 2014, we classified certain assets as assets held for sale. These assets held for sale are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value (see Note 2, under the heading "Goodwill and Other Intangibles," and Note 3 for additional information). The following table presents information about our assets classified as held for sale as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by us to determine such fair values and the related impairment loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and for the year ended December 31, 2014 (dollars in millions):
 
Level 3
 
Total Asset Impairment for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
 
Total Asset Impairment for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
 
Level 3
 
Total Asset Impairment for the Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
As of June 30, 2015
 
 
As of December 31, 2014
 
Property and equipment, net
$
50.0

 
$

 
$
1.9

 
$
50.0

 
$
80.2

Goodwill allocated to sale of business

 

 

 

 
7.0

Assets held for sale
$
50.0

 
$

 
$
1.9

 
$
50.0

 
$
87.2


We had no liabilities fair valued on a non-recurring basis during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014.

33



The following tables present quantitative information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (dollars in millions):
 
Fair Value as of
June 30, 2015
 
Valuation Technique(s)
 
Unobservable Input
 
Range (Weighted Average)
Embedded contractual derivative asset
$
9.5

 
Monte Carlo Simulation Approach
 
Health Net Health Care Expenditures
 
1.52
 %
2.72%
 
(2.13%)
 
National Health Care Expenditures
 
-0.87
 %
8.18%
 
(3.80%)
Embedded contractual derivative liability
 
 
Monte Carlo Simulation Approach
 
Health Net Health Care Expenditures
 
-2.80
 %
15.33%
 
(6.87%)
$
9.8

 
 
National Health Care Expenditures
 
-0.84
 %
8.48%
 
(9.53%)
Goodwill - Western Region reporting unit
$
558.9

 
Income Approach
 
Discount Rate
 
7.5
 %
7.5%
 
(7.5%)
Assets held for sale
$
50.0

 
Income Approach
 
Discount Rate
 
12.0
 %
12.0%
 
(12.0%)
 
Fair Value as of
December 31, 2014
 
Valuation Technique(s)
 
Unobservable Input
 
Range (Weighted Average)
Embedded contractual derivative asset
$
10.0

 
Monte Carlo Simulation Approach
 
Health Net Health Care Expenditures
 
-0.08
 %
2.74%
 
(2.02%)
 
National Health Care Expenditures
 
3.45
 %
4.14%
 
(3.80%)
Embedded contractual derivative liability
 
 
Monte Carlo Simulation Approach
 
Health Net Health Care Expenditures
 
0.79
 %
10.76%
 
(5.73%)
$
2.6

 
 
National Health Care Expenditures
 
0.64
 %
8.43%
 
(4.38%)
Goodwill - Western Region reporting unit
$
558.9

 
Income Approach
 
Discount Rate
 
7.5
 %
7.5%
 
(7.5%)
Assets held for sale
$
50.0

 
Income Approach
 
Discount Rate
 
12.0
 %
12.0%
 
(12.0%)
Valuation policies and procedures are managed by our finance group, which regularly monitors fair value measurements. Fair value measurements, including those categorized within Level 3, are prepared and reviewed on a quarterly basis and any third-party valuations are reviewed for reasonableness and compliance with the Fair Value Measurement Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification. Specifically, we compare prices received from our pricing service to prices reported by the custodian or third-party investment advisers, and we perform a review of the inputs, validating that they are reasonable and observable in the marketplace, if applicable. For our embedded contractual derivative asset and/or liability, we use internal historical and projected health care expenditure data and the national health care expenditures as reflected in the National External Trend Standards, which is published by CMS, to estimate the unobservable inputs. The growth rates in each of these health care expenditures are modeled using the Monte Carlo simulation approach, and the resulting value is discounted to the valuation date. We estimate our non-recurring Level 3 asset and goodwill for our Western Region Operations reporting unit using the income approach based

34



on discounted cash flows. We estimate our non-recurring Level 3 assets held for sale based on a combination of the discounted total consideration expected to be received in connection with the services and asset sale agreements, income approach based on a discounted cash flow methodology, and replacement cost methodology.
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of our embedded contractual derivative are the estimated growth in Health Net health care expenditures and the estimated growth in national health care expenditures. Significant increases (decreases) in the estimated growth in Health Net health care expenditures or decreases (increases) in the estimated growth in national health expenditures would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of our assets held for sale is our discount rate. Significant increases (decreases) in the discount rate would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.
9. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Overview
We record reserves and accrue costs for certain legal proceedings and regulatory matters to the extent that we determine an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. While such reserves and accrued costs reflect our best estimate of the probable loss for such matters, our recorded amounts may differ materially from the actual amount of any such losses. In some cases, no estimate of the possible loss or range of loss in excess of amounts accrued, if any, can be made because of the inherently unpredictable nature of legal and regulatory proceedings, which may be exacerbated by various factors, including but not limited to that they may involve indeterminate claims for monetary damages or may involve fines, penalties or punitive damages; present novel legal theories or legal uncertainties; involve disputed facts; represent a shift in regulatory policy; involve a large number of parties, claimants or regulatory bodies; are in the early stages of the proceedings; involve a number of separate proceedings, each with a wide range of potential outcomes; or result in a change of business practices. Further, there may be various levels of judicial review available to the Company in connection with any such proceeding in the event damages are awarded or a fine or penalty is assessed. As of the date of this report, amounts accrued for legal proceedings and regulatory matters were not material. However, it is possible that in a particular quarter or annual period our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and/or liquidity could be materially adversely affected by an ultimate unfavorable resolution of or development in legal and/or regulatory proceedings, including those described below in this Note 9 under the heading “Military and Family Life Counseling Program Putative Class and Collective Actions,” depending, in part, upon our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or liquidity in such period, and our reputation may be adversely affected. Except for the regulatory and legal proceedings discussed in this Note 9 under the heading “Military and Family Life Counseling Program Putative Class and Collective Actions,” management believes that the ultimate outcome of any of the regulatory and legal proceedings that are currently pending against us should not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and liquidity.
Military and Family Life Counseling Program Putative Class and Collective Actions
We are a defendant in three related litigation matters pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the “Northern District of California”) relating to the independent contractor classification of counselors (“MFLCs”) who contracted with our subsidiary, MHN Government Services, Inc. (“MHNGS”), to provide short-term, non-medical counseling at U.S. military installations throughout the country under our Military and Family Life Counseling (formerly Military and Family Life Consultants) program.
On June 14, 2011, two former MFLCs filed a putative class action in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Pierce County against Health Net, Inc., MHNGS, and MHN Services d/b/a MHN Services Corporation (also a subsidiary), on behalf of themselves and a proposed class of current and former MFLCs who have performed services as independent contractors in the state of Washington from June 14, 2008 to the present. Plaintiffs claim that MFLCs were misclassified as independent contractors under Washington law and are entitled to the wages and overtime pay that they would have received had they been classified as non-exempt employees. Plaintiffs seek unpaid wages, overtime pay, statutory penalties, attorneys’ fees and interest. We moved to compel the case to arbitration, and the court denied the motion on September 30, 2011. We appealed the decision. The Washington Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s decision on August 15, 2013. On February 26, 2014, we removed this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act.
On May 15, 2012, the same two MFLCs who filed the Washington action, as well as 12 other named plaintiffs, filed a proposed collective action lawsuit against the same defendants in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington on behalf of themselves and other current and former MFLCs who have performed services as

35


independent contractors nationwide from May 15, 2009 to the present. They allege misclassification under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and seek unpaid wages, unpaid benefits, overtime pay, statutory penalties, attorneys’ fees and interest. They also seek penalties under California Labor Code section 226.8. The court has since transferred the case to the Northern District of California to relate it to a virtually identical suit filed on October 2, 2012 against MHNGS and Managed Health Network, Inc. (“MHN”) (also a subsidiary).
The third October 2012 suit alleges misclassification under the FLSA on behalf of a nationwide class, as well under several state laws on behalf of MFLCs who worked in California, New Mexico, Hawaii, Kentucky, New York, Nevada, and North Carolina. On October 24, 2013, the parties agreed to toll the statutes of limitations for overtime violations in the following states: Alaska, Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.
On November 1, 2012, we moved to compel arbitration in the Northern District of California, and the court denied the motion on April 3, 2013. We noticed our appeal of that decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on April 8, 2013. On April 25, 2013, the district court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for conditional FLSA collective action certification to allow notice to be sent to the FLSA collective action members. The court stayed all other proceedings pending an outcome in the Ninth Circuit appeal. On December 17, 2014, a divided (2-1) Ninth Circuit panel affirmed the district court's decision denying our motion to compel arbitration. On January 14, 2015, we petitioned for rehearing en banc, and the Ninth Circuit denied the petition on February 9, 2015. On February 13, 2015, the Ninth Circuit granted our motion to stay the proceedings, and the proceedings will remain stayed until the final disposition by the U.S. Supreme Court of our petition for a writ of certiorari. Our petition for writ of certiorari was filed on June 10, 2015. On July 23, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court requested that the Plaintiffs file a response to the petition, which is currently due August 24, 2015.
On March 28, 2014, the original Washington case was transferred to the Northern District of California to relate it to the two FLSA suits pending there. On April 11, 2014, we moved to stay the suit pending the Ninth Circuit appeal. We also filed two alternative motions seeking an order to either compel the case to arbitration or dismiss Plaintiffs’ class claims and California Labor Code section 226.8 claims. On June 3, 2014, the court granted our motion to stay, and denied the later alternative motions without prejudice to renewal after the stay is lifted. This suit will also remain stayed until the U.S. Supreme Court's disposition of our June 10, 2015 petition for writ of certiorari.
We intend to vigorously defend ourselves against these claims; however, these proceedings are subject to many uncertainties.
Miscellaneous Proceedings
In the ordinary course of our business operations, we are subject to periodic reviews, investigations and audits by various federal and state regulatory agencies, including, without limitation, CMS, DMHC, the Office of Civil Rights of HHS and state departments of insurance, with respect to our compliance with a wide variety of rules and regulations applicable to our business, including, without limitation, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, rules relating to pre-authorization penalties, payment of out-of-network claims, timely review of grievances and appeals, and timely and accurate payment of claims, any one of which may result in remediation of certain claims, contract termination, the loss of licensure or the right to participate in certain programs, and the assessment of regulatory fines or penalties, which could be substantial. From time to time, we receive subpoenas and other requests for information from, and are subject to investigations by, such regulatory agencies, as well as from state attorneys general. There also continues to be heightened review by regulatory authorities of, and increased litigation regarding, the health care industry’s business practices, including, without limitation, information privacy, premium rate increases, utilization management, appeal and grievance processing, rescission of insurance coverage and claims payment practices.
In addition, in the ordinary course of our business operations, we are party to various other legal proceedings, including, without limitation, litigation arising out of our general business activities, such as contract disputes, employment litigation, wage and hour claims, including, without limitation, cases involving allegations of misclassification of employees and/or failure to pay for off-the-clock work, real estate and intellectual property claims, claims brought by members or providers seeking coverage or additional reimbursement for services allegedly rendered to our members, but which allegedly were denied, underpaid, not timely paid or not paid, and claims arising out of the acquisition or divestiture of various business units or other assets. We also are subject to claims relating to the performance of contractual obligations to providers, members, employer groups and others, including the alleged failure to properly pay claims and challenges to the manner in which we process claims, and claims alleging that we have engaged in unfair business practices. In addition, we are subject to claims relating to information security incidents and breaches, reinsurance agreements, rescission of coverage and other types of insurance coverage obligations and claims

36


relating to the insurance industry in general. In our role as a federal and state government contractor, we are, and may be in the future, subject to qui tam litigation brought by individuals who seek to sue on behalf of the government for violations of, among other things, state and federal false claims laws. We are, and may be in the future, subject to class action lawsuits brought against various managed care organizations and other class action lawsuits.
We intend to vigorously defend ourselves against the miscellaneous legal and regulatory proceedings to which we are currently a party; however, these proceedings are subject to many uncertainties. In some of the cases pending against us, substantial non-economic or punitive damages are being sought.
Potential Settlements
We regularly evaluate legal proceedings and regulatory matters pending against us, including those described above in this Note 9, to determine if settlement of such matters would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The costs associated with any settlement of the various legal proceedings and regulatory matters to which we are or may be subject from time to time, including those described above in this Note 9, could be substantial and, in certain cases, could result in a significant earnings charge or impact on our cash flow in any particular quarter in which we enter into a settlement agreement and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and/or liquidity and may affect our reputation.
10. INCOME TAXES
The effective income tax rate from operations was 55.8% and (22.3)% for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and 55.8% and 6.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, our effective income tax rate was adversely impacted by the health insurer fee under the ACA, which is not deductible for federal income tax purposes and in many state jurisdictions. See Note 2, under the heading "Accounting for Certain Provisions of the ACA—Premium-based Fee on Health Insurers" for additional information regarding the health insurer fee.
For the three months ended June 30, 2014, we incurred a loss on a stock deduction under Internal Revenue Code Section 165, which produced a tax benefit of $72.6 million, net of adjustments to our reserve for uncertain tax benefits. This tax benefit caused our effective tax rate for the quarter to be a negative percentage. Other items that caused our effective income tax rate to differ from the statutory federal tax rate of 35% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 included state income taxes, tax-exempt interest and non-deductible compensation.
11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Amendment to Cognizant Master Services Agreement
On July 1, 2015, Health Net entered into an amendment (the “Cognizant Amendment”) to the Master Services Agreement, with Cognizant. The Cognizant Amendment suspends efforts towards, and defers the occurrence of, the BPaaS Services Commencement Date (as defined in the Master Services Agreement) by, among other things, extending the Pre-BPaaS Services Commencement Date Termination (as defined in the Master Services Agreement) period, or the period of time during which the Company may terminate the Cognizant Agreement for a break-up fee of $10 million, until after the closing of the Company’s previously-announced merger with Centene pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. Concurrent with executing the Master Services Agreement, we entered into the Asset Purchase Agreement with Cognizant, through which Cognizant was to purchase certain software assets and related intellectual property from us. The closing of the Asset Sale was scheduled for the BPaaS Services Commencement Date. As a result, the parties’ aforementioned decision to suspend efforts towards the BPaaS Services Commencement Date has similarly deferred the Asset Sale.
Cognizant will continue to provide certain application and business processing services pursuant to existing agreements it has with the Company. The Company and Cognizant have agreed to exercise good faith efforts to explore and, if both parties agree to proceed, to negotiate and enter into a new definitive agreement relating to certain services described in the Master Services Agreement, which new definitive agreement shall survive the closing of the Merger. See Note 1 for information regarding our Merger Agreement with Centene.
Consent Solicitation for Senior Notes
On August 3, 2015, the Company commenced a solicitation with respect to the Senior Notes (as described in Note 7, "Financing Arrangements") to amend the defined term "Change of Control" in the Senior Notes to provide that the Merger will not constitute a Change of Control. If the requisite consents are received, the Company intends to

37


execute a supplement to the indenture governing the Senior Notes effecting the amendment, and accordingly, no Change of Control Offer (as defined in the Senior Notes) to repurchase the Senior Notes would be required in connection with the completion of the Merger. The Company is offering a cash payment of $2.50 per $1,000 in aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes for which a consent is validly delivered. The consent solicitation is scheduled to expire on August 12, 2015.
The Company is conducting the consent solicitation at the request of Centene pursuant to a covenant contained in the Merger Agreement (see Note 1). Centene has agreed that it will be responsible for all liabilities incurred by the Company in connection with the consent solicitation, including but not limited to all consent fees payable to holders of the Senior Notes.


38



Item  2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
The following discussion and other portions of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 regarding our business, financial condition and results of operations. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and we are including this statement for purposes of complying with these safe-harbor provisions. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical information provided or incorporated by reference herein may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “estimate,” “intend,” “feels,” “will,” “projects” and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Managed health care companies operate in a highly competitive, constantly changing environment that is significantly influenced by, among other things, aggressive marketing and pricing practices of competitors and regulatory oversight. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those reflected in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 ("Form 10-K") and the other risks discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this "Form 10-Q") and our other filings from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). In this Form 10-Q, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Company,” “Health Net,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Health Net, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Any or all forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q and in any other public filings or statements we make may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many of the factors discussed in our filings with the SEC may impact future results. These factors should be considered in conjunction with any discussion of operations or results by us or our representatives, including any forward-looking discussion, as well as information contained in press releases, presentations to securities analysts or investors or other communications by us or our representatives. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis, judgment, belief or expectation only as of the date thereof and are subject to changes in circumstances and a number of risks and uncertainties. Except as may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date such statement was made.
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, together with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this report, should be read in their entirety and in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Form 10-K since they contain detailed information that is collectively important to understanding Health Net, Inc. and its subsidiaries’ results of operations and financial condition.
OVERVIEW
General
We are a publicly traded managed care organization that delivers managed health care services through health plans and government-sponsored managed care plans. Our mission is to help people be healthy, secure and comfortable. We provide and administer health benefits to approximately 6.1 million individuals across the country through group, individual, Medicare (including the Medicare prescription drug benefit commonly referred to as "Part D"), Medicaid, dual eligible, U.S. Department of Defense (“Department of Defense” or “DoD”), including TRICARE, and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs ("VA") programs. We also offer behavioral health, substance abuse and employee assistance programs and managed health care products related to prescription drugs.
How We Report Our Results
Our reportable segments are comprised of Western Region Operations and Government Contracts, each of which is described below. See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements for more information regarding our reportable segments.
Our health plan services are provided under our Western Region Operations reportable segment, which includes the operations primarily conducted in California, Arizona, Oregon and Washington for our commercial, Medicare,

39



Medicaid and dual eligibles health plans, our health and life insurance companies, our pharmaceutical services subsidiary and certain operations of our behavioral health subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2015, we had approximately 3.2 million medical members in our Western Region Operations reportable segment.
Our Government Contracts segment includes our government-sponsored managed care contract with the DoD under the TRICARE program in the North Region, our Military and Family Life Counseling, formerly Military and Family Life Consultant (“MFLC”) contract with DoD and other health care related government contracts, including the Patient Centered Community Care program (“PC3 Program”) contract we have with VA. On April 1, 2011, we began delivery of administrative services under a new Managed Care Support Contract (“T-3 contract”) for the TRICARE North Region. Under the T-3 contract for the TRICARE North Region, we provide administrative services to approximately 2.8 million Military Health System (“MHS”) eligible beneficiaries. For additional information on our T-3, MFLC and PC3 Program contracts, see "—Results of Operations—Government Contracts Reportable Segment."
On November 2, 2014, we signed a definitive master services agreement (as subsequently amended and restated, the "Master Services Agreement") with Cognizant Healthcare Services, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation ("Cognizant") to provide certain services to us. In connection with the Master Services Agreement, we also entered into an asset purchase agreement (the "Asset Purchase Agreement") pursuant to which we agreed to sell certain software assets and related intellectual property we own to Cognizant (the "Asset Sale," and, together with the transactions contemplated by the Master Services Agreement, the "Cognizant Transaction"). In connection with the Cognizant Transaction, we reviewed our reportable segments and determined that there were no changes to our reportable segments. See Note 3 and Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on the Cognizant Transaction, including the parties subsequent decision to defer the BPaaS Commencement Date (as defined in the Master Services Agreement) in connection with the announcement of our transaction with Centene Corporation ("Centene"). This transaction is described in further detail in "—Recent Developments" below and Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements.
How We Measure Our Profitability
Our profitability depends in large part on our ability to, among other things, effectively price our health care products; accurately predict and effectively manage health care and pharmacy costs; effectively contract with health care providers; attract and retain members; and manage our general and administrative (“G&A”) and selling expenses. In addition, factors such as state and federal health care reform legislation and regulation, competition and general economic conditions affect our operations and profitability. The effect of escalating health care costs, as well as any changes in our ability to negotiate competitive rates with our providers, may impose further risks to our ability to profitably underwrite our business. Each of these factors may have a material impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We measure our Western Region Operations reportable segment profitability based on pretax income and net income. Pretax income is calculated as health plan services premiums and administrative services fees and other income less health plan services expense and G&A and other net expenses, including selling expenses. Net income is calculated as pretax income less income tax provision. See “—Results of Operations—Western Region Operations Reportable Segment—Western Region Operations Segment Results” for a calculation of pretax income and net income.
Health plan services premiums generally include health maintenance organization (“HMO”), point of service (“POS”) and preferred provider organization (“PPO”) premiums from employer groups and individuals, and from Medicare recipients who have purchased supplemental benefit coverage (which premiums are based on a predetermined prepaid fee), Medicaid revenues based on multi-year contracts to provide care to Medicaid recipients (which includes retroactive and retrospective premium adjustments), and revenue under Medicare risk contracts to provide care to enrolled Medicare recipients. Health plan services premiums also can include amounts for risk factor adjustments and additional premiums that we charge in some places to members who purchase our Medicare risk plans. Health plan services premiums also includes our revenues from the California Coordinated Care Initiative (the "CCI") program. For additional information on the CCI, see "—Results of Operations—Western Region Operations Reportable Segment—California Coordinated Care Initiative."
The amount of premiums we earn in a given period is driven by the rates we charge and enrollment levels. Administrative services fees and other income primarily includes revenue for administrative services such as claims processing, customer service, medical management, provider network access and other administrative services.
Health plan services expense generally includes medical and related costs for health services provided to our members, including physician services, hospital and related professional services, outpatient care, and pharmacy benefit costs. These expenses are impacted by unit costs and utilization rates. Unit costs represent the health care cost per visit, and the utilization rates represent the volume of health care consumption by our members.

40



G&A expenses include, among other things, those costs related to employees and benefits, consulting and professional fees, marketing, business expansion and cost reduction initiatives, premium taxes and assessments, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the "ACA") related fees, occupancy costs and litigation and regulatory-related costs. Such costs are driven by membership levels, introduction of new products or provision of new services, system consolidations, outsourcing activities and compliance requirements for changing regulations, among other things. These expenses also include expenses associated with corporate shared services and other costs to reflect the fact that such expenses are incurred primarily to support health plan services. Selling expenses consist of external broker commission expenses and generally vary with premium volume.
We measure our Government Contracts segment profitability based on pretax income and net income. Pretax income is calculated as Government Contracts revenue less Government Contracts cost. Net income is calculated as pretax income less income tax provision. See “—Results of Operations—Government Contracts Reportable Segment—Government Contracts Segment Results” for a calculation of the government contracts pretax income and net income.
Under the T-3 contract for the TRICARE North Region, we provide various types of administrative services including provider network management, referral management, medical management, disease management, enrollment, customer service, clinical support service, and claims processing. These services are structured as cost reimbursement arrangements for health care costs plus administrative fees earned in the form of fixed prices, fixed unit prices, and contingent fees and payments based on various incentives and penalties. We recognize revenue related to administrative services on a straight-line basis over the option period, when the fees become fixed and determinable. The TRICARE North Region members are served by our network and out-of-network providers in accordance with the T-3 contract. We pay health care costs related to these services to the providers and are later reimbursed by the DoD for such payments. Under the terms of the T-3 contract, we are not the primary obligor for health care services and accordingly, we do not include health care costs and related reimbursements in our consolidated statements of operations. The T-3 contract also includes various performance-based incentives and penalties. For each of the incentives or penalties, we adjust revenue accordingly based on the amount that we have earned or incurred at each interim date and are legally entitled to in the event of a contract termination. See “—Results of Operations—Government Contracts Reportable Segment” for additional information on our T-3 contract.
Other government contracts revenues are recognized in the month in which the eligible beneficiaries are entitled to health care services or in the month in which the administrative services are performed or the period that coverage for services is provided. See “—Results of Operations—Government Contracts Reportable Segment” for additional information on our other government contracts such as the MFLC contract and the PC3 Program.
Recent Development
On July 2, 2015, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Centene Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Centene"), together with Chopin Merger Sub I, Inc. ("Merger Sub I") and Chopin Merger Sub II, Inc. ("Merger Sub II"), each a Delaware corporation and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Centene. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, (i) Merger Sub I will merge with and into the Company (the "Merger"), with the Company as the surviving corporation (the "Surviving Corporation") and (ii) subject to delivery of a legal opinion from counsel to the Surviving Corporation regarding certain aspects of the tax treatment of the transactions, immediately after the consummation of the Merger, the Surviving Corporation will merge with and into Merger Sub II, with Merger Sub II continuing as the surviving company.
At the effective time of the Merger, our then existing stockholders will receive per share merger consideration consisting of $28.25 in cash and 0.6220 of one share of Centene's common stock.
The Company and Centene each have agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to directly or indirectly solicit competing acquisition proposals or to enter into, continue or participate in discussions or negotiations concerning, or enter into any letter of intent, memorandum of understanding, merger agreement or other agreement relating to, an alternative business combination. However, our board of directors may, subject to certain conditions, withdraw its recommendation that its stockholders vote in favor of adoption of the Merger Agreement and terminate the Merger Agreement, and the Centene board of directors may, subject to certain conditions, withdraw its recommendation that its stockholders vote in favor of approval of the issuance of common stock forming part of the Merger Consideration (as defined in the Merger Agreement) and terminate the Merger Agreement, in connection with the receipt of an alternative proposal that our board of directors or Centene's board of directors, as the case may be, determines constitutes a superior proposal, and such board determines in good faith that a failure to effect such a withdrawal of recommendation would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties.

41



The completion of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions, including approval by our stockholders of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval by Centene's stockholders of the issuance of the common stock forming part of the merger consideration, as well as various regulatory approvals. The completion of the Merger is not conditioned on receipt of financing by Centene. The Merger is expected to close by early 2016.
Cognizant Transaction
On November 2, 2014, we entered into the Master Services Agreement with Cognizant. Under the terms of the Master Services Agreement, Cognizant agreed to, among other things, provide us with certain consulting, technology and administrative services in the following areas: claims management, membership and benefits configuration, customer contact center services, information technology, quality assurance, appeals and grievance services, and non-clinical medical management support (collectively, the "BP and IT Services"). Concurrent with executing the Master Services Agreement, we entered into the Asset Purchase Agreement with Cognizant, through which Cognizant agreed to purchase certain software assets and related intellectual property from us for $50 million (the "Asset Sale"). See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information. However, in connection with the announcement of the Merger with Centene, the parties agreed to suspend efforts towards, and defer the occurrence of, the BPaaS Services Commencement Date. Accordingly, on July 1, 2015, the parties entered into an amendment to the Master Services Agreement (the “Cognizant Amendment”) which, among other things, extended the Pre-BPaaS Services Commencement Date Termination period, or the period of time during which the Company may terminate the Cognizant Agreement for a break-up fee of $10 million, until after the closing of the Merger. Cognizant will continue to provide certain application and business processing services pursuant to existing agreements it has with the Company. The Company and Cognizant have agreed to exercise good faith efforts to explore and, if both parties agree to proceed, to negotiate and enter into a new definitive agreement relating to certain services described in the Master Services Agreement, which new definitive agreement shall survive the closing of the Merger.
The closing of the Asset Sale was scheduled for the BPaaS Services Commencement Date. As a result, the parties’ aforementioned decision to suspend efforts towards the BPaaS Services Commencement Date has similarly deferred the Asset Sale.
Due to the deferral of the Cognizant Transaction, the Master Services Agreement will not generate the expected $150 to $200 million in annual general and administrative and depreciation expense savings in the previously anticipated time frame. However, we are engaging in ongoing efforts to negotiate with Cognizant and other vendors to implement alternative arrangements for the BP and IT Services that were to be provided through the Cognizant Transaction to achieve general and administrative expense savings.
Our operating results in our Corporate/Other segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 were impacted by $26.4 million and $73.7 million, respectively, in pretax expenses primarily related to the Cognizant Transaction. See Note 3 and Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the Cognizant Transaction.
Health Care Reform Legislation and Implementation
The ACA transformed the U.S. health care system through a series of complex initiatives. Due in part to the magnitude, scope and complexity of these initiatives, as well as their ongoing implementation, the ultimate impact of the ACA on us remains difficult to predict. The ACA has provided growth opportunities for health insurers, including us, but also introduces new risks and uncertainties, and required changes in the way products are designed, underwritten, priced, distributed and administered. While we have experienced significant growth in our revenues and membership in certain products as a result of the ACA, the measures initiated by the ACA and the associated preparation for and implementation of these measures have had, and will continue to have, an adverse impact on, among other things, the costs of operating our business, and could materially adversely affect our business, cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.
For a detailed description of the ACA’s provisions and related health care reform programs, initiatives, rules and regulations, see "Item 1. Business-Government Regulation—Health Care Reform Legislation and Implementation" in our Form 10-K. For additional discussion of some of our risks and uncertainties related to the ACA, see "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Form 10-K.
Legal, Regulatory and Legislative Developments
Several recent lawsuits have considered the question of whether the ACA authorizes the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) to provide premium tax credits to individuals who purchase coverage through a federally-facilitated

42



exchange (“FFE”). On June 25, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling on one of these challenges in King v. Burwell. In King, the Court upheld the IRS rule that the ACA's premium tax credits are available to individuals in states that have an FFE. The King ruling settled one of the most prominent legal challenges to the ACA's implementation, though other legal challenges to the ACA remain ongoing, including litigation around federal regulations regarding contraception coverage and the ability of HHS to make payments to plans under the ACA’s cost sharing reductions program.
Medicaid Expansion
In connection with the ACA, the federal government extended funds to those states that opted to expand Medicaid eligibility from a pool that included residents with incomes up to 100% of the federal poverty level ("FPL") to an expanded pool of residents with incomes up to 133% of the FPL. Both Arizona and California are amongst the states that have opted into this "Medicaid expansion." As of June 30, 2015, our total Medicaid membership increased by 27.4 percent as compared to June 30, 2014, primarily as a result of Medicaid expansion.
Public Health Insurance Exchanges
The ACA also required the establishment of state-run or federally facilitated "exchanges" where individuals and small groups may purchase health coverage. We currently participate as Qualified Health Plans ("QHPs") in the exchanges in California and Arizona. We currently operate in 13 of 19 exchange rating regions in California in the individual market and in all 19 exchange rating regions in the small business health options program ("SHOP"). Open enrollment for the coverage year beginning January 1, 2015 began on October 1, 2014 and ended on February 15, 2015.
We have experienced significant growth in our individual commercial enrollment since open enrollment for the exchanges commenced in October 2013. However, as we move past our second enrollment period, the exchanges remain a new marketplace with which we have limited experience, and a variety of factors could alter the economics and structure of our participation in the exchanges. These factors include, among others, changing economic conditions, the dynamic competitive environment on the exchanges, various legislative and legal developments and the ongoing evolution of the regulatory framework for the exchanges. If we are unable to successfully adapt to any such changes in our markets, our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations may be adversely affected. For more information on the exchanges, including enrollment information, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements and "—Western Region Operations Reportable Segment—Western Region Operations Segment Membership."
Health Insurer Fee
Our operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 were impacted by fees imposed under the ACA, including $58.5 million and $116.3 million, respectively, of amortization of the deferred cost of the annual non-deductible health insurer fee calculated on 2014 net premiums written (the "health insurer fee"). In September 2014, we paid the federal government a lump sum of $141.4 million for our portion of the health insurer fee that was calculated based on 2013 premiums. We currently estimate that our allocable share of the health insurer fee based on 2014 premiums and payable in September 2015 (the "2014 Fee") will be approximately $232.6 million. However, this estimate is subject to inherent uncertainty as the amount of premiums upon which the 2014 Fee allocation is based is subject to a review and correction period by the IRS. The final assessment for the 2014 Fee is not expected to be made until August 2015. While we are required to accrue for the health insurer fee on a pro rata basis throughout the year, we could experience significant volatility in our cash flow from operations relative to our results of operations in a given period because the health insurer fee is payable in a single lump sum. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, due to the non-deductibility of the health insurer fee for federal income tax purposes, our effective income tax rate was adversely affected by 17.4 percentage points and 17.2 percentage points, respectively. In future periods, we expect that the non-deductibility of the health insurer fee will continue to have a material impact on our effective income tax rate.
While certain types of entities and benefits are fully or partially exempt from the health insurer fee, including, among others, government entities, certain non-profit insurers and self-funded plans, we are unable to take advantage of any significant exemptions due to our current mix of plans and product offerings. Consequently, our portion of the health insurer fee represents a higher percentage of our premium revenues than those of our competitors who have business lines that are exempt from the health insurer fee or whose non-profit status results in a reduced health insurer fee. We generally are also unable to match those competitors’ ability to support reduced premiums by virtue of making changes to distribution arrangements, decreasing spending on non-medical product features and services, or otherwise adjusting operating costs and reducing general and administrative expenses, which may have an adverse effect on our profitability and our ability to compete effectively with these competitors. For more information on this and other ACA

43



related fees, including the associated risks, see Note 2, under the heading "Accounting for Certain Provisions of the ACA," to our consolidated financial statements.
Premium Stabilization Programs
The ACA also includes premium stabilization provisions designed to apportion risk amongst insurers, including the reinsurance, risk adjustment, and risk corridors programs ("3Rs").
The permanent risk adjustment program is applicable to plans in the individual and small group markets that are subject to the ACA's market reforms. This risk adjustment program became effective at the beginning of 2014 and has and will continue to shape the economics of health care coverage both within and outside the exchanges. These risk adjustment provisions will effectively transfer funds from health plans with relatively lower risk enrollees to plans with relatively higher risk enrollees to help protect against the consequences of adverse selection. In addition to these permanent risk adjustment provisions, the ACA implements temporary reinsurance and risk corridors programs, which seek to ease the transition into the post-ACA market by helping to stabilize rates and protect against rate uncertainty in the initial years of the ACA.
The individual and small group market represent a significant portion of our commercial business and the relevant amounts transferred under applicable premium stabilization provisions may be substantial. Estimating the amounts for the 3Rs involve complex calculations, assumptions and judgments. Our estimation process relies in part on data provided by participating insurers, including us, and also requires interpretation and application of existing ACA laws, regulations and guidance, including with respect to regulations related to treatment of income taxes in calculating risk corridors. How the certain laws and regulations are interpreted and applied may impact the estimation process, which impact may be material. Accordingly, we will experience premium adjustments to our health plan services premium revenues and health plan services expenses based on changes to our estimated amounts related to the 3Rs until we receive the final reconciliation and settlement amount from HHS. Such estimated amounts may differ materially from actual amounts ultimately received or paid under the provisions, which may have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
We have made and are continuing to make significant efforts to design and implement a cohesive strategy with respect to the exchanges and these premium stabilization programs, but these programs, among other things, are subject to risks inherent in untested initiatives and government programs, and the relevant regulatory framework for the exchanges and the 3Rs remains subject to change and interpretation over time. Whether due to regulatory uncertainty or otherwise, if these premium stabilization programs prove ineffective in mitigating our financial risks, including adverse selection risk, if we experience significant payment delays with respect to any 3R receivables, or we are unable to successfully adapt our strategy to these or any other future changes in our markets, our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations may be materially adversely affected. See Note 2, under the heading "Accounting for Certain Provisions of the ACA," to our consolidated financial statements for additional information on the 3Rs.
MLRs
Under the ACA, commercial health plans with medical loss ratios ("MLR") on fully insured products, as calculated as set forth in the ACA, that fall below certain targets are required to rebate ratable portions of their premiums annually. Certain of the states in which we operate include similar rebate provisions. For example, a medical loss ratio corridor for the California Department of Health Care Services ("DHCS") adult Medicaid expansion members under the Medicaid program in California ("Medi-Cal") requires rebate payments to or from DHCS depending on MLRs for this population. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had accrued $261.5 million and $200.6 million, respectively, for an MLR rebate with respect to our adult Medicaid expansion population payable to DHCS. Accordingly, during the six months ended June 30, 2015, health plan services premium revenues were reduced by $60.9 million. Our Medicaid contract with the state of Arizona contains profit-sharing provisions. Because our Arizona Medicaid profits were in excess of the amount we are allowed to fully retain, we reduced health plan services premium revenue by $10.0 million and $25.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. With respect to our Arizona Medicaid contract, the profit corridor receivable balance included in other noncurrent assets as of June 30, 2015 was $0, and the profit corridor payable balance included in accounts payable and other liabilities as of June 30, 2015 was $7.2 million. The profit corridor payable balance included in other noncurrent liabilities as of June 30, 2015 was $7.1 million. In the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System ("AHCCCS") withheld $36.2 million in connection with the profit corridor payable from our capitation payment. See Note 2, under the heading "Health Plan Services Revenue Recognition," to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion on these MLR provisions.

44



We and other health insurance companies continue to face uncertainty and execution risk due to the multiple, complex ACA implementations that were and are required in abbreviated time frames in new markets. Additionally, in many cases, our operational and strategic initiatives must be implemented in evolving regulatory environments and without the benefit of established market data. In addition, the relative lack of operating experience in these new marketplaces for insurers and, in certain cases, providers and consumers, has fostered a dynamic marketplace that may require us to adjust our operating and strategic initiatives over time, and there is no assurance that insurers, including us, will be able to do so successfully. Our execution risk encapsulates, among other things, our simultaneous participation in the exchanges, Medicaid expansion and the CCI. These initiatives involved the incorporation of new and expanded populations and, among other things, have required that we restructure our provider network in response, and will require us to remain diligent in monitoring the market to, among other things, effectively and efficiently adapt to our dynamic environment. Any delay or failure by us to successfully execute our operational and strategic initiatives with respect to health care reform or otherwise appropriately react to the legislation, implementing regulations, actions of our competitors and the changing marketplace could result in operational disruptions, disputes with our providers or members, increased exposure to litigation, regulatory issues, damage to our existing or potential member relationships or other adverse consequences that could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Consolidated Results
The table below and the discussion that follows summarize our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.
 
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Health plan services premiums
$
4,003,432

 
$
3,261,878

 
$
7,724,232

 
$
6,143,223

Government contracts
141,055

 
154,083

 
295,769

 
298,173

Net investment income
16,424

 
12,043

 
29,665

 
23,145

Administrative services fees and other income
2,712

 
(6,612
)
 
3,853

 
(4,214
)
Total revenues
4,163,623

 
3,421,392

 
8,053,519

 
6,460,327

Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Health plan services (excluding depreciation and amortization)
3,363,742

 
2,763,179

 
6,506,605

 
5,165,521

Government contracts
137,262

 
133,208

 
279,802

 
265,182

General and administrative
448,713

 
344,734

 
902,561

 
705,757

Selling
69,190

 
64,002

 
137,886

 
128,154

Depreciation and amortization
4,202

 
9,641

 
8,509

 
19,304

Interest
8,412

 
7,826

 
16,461

 
15,647

Asset impairment

 

 
1,884

 

Total expenses
4,031,521

 
3,322,590

 
7,853,708

 
6,299,565

Income from operations before income taxes
132,102

 
98,802

 
199,811

 
160,762

Income tax provision
73,734

 
(22,065
)
 
111,455

 
11,108

Net income
$
58,368

 
$
120,867

 
$
88,356

 
$
149,654

Net income per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.76

 
$
1.51

 
$
1.15

 
$
1.87

Diluted
$
0.75

 
$
1.49

 
$
1.13

 
$
1.85

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we reported net income of $58.4 million or $0.75 per diluted share and net income of $88.4 million or $1.13 per diluted share, respectively, as compared to net income of $120.9 million or $1.49 per diluted share and net income of $149.7 million or $1.85 per diluted share, respectively, for the

45



same periods in 2014. Pretax margins were 3.2 percent and 2.5 percent, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to 2.9 percent and 2.5 percent, respectively, for the same periods in 2014.
Our total revenues increased 21.7 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2015 to approximately $4.2 billion from approximately $3.4 billion in the same period in 2014 and increased 24.7 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2015 to approximately $8.1 billion from approximately $6.5 billion in the same period in 2014.
Health plan services premium revenues increased by 22.7 percent to approximately $4.0 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to approximately $3.3 billion in the same period in 2014, and increased by 25.7 percent to approximately $7.7 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to approximately $6.1 billion in the same period in 2014.
Health plan services expenses increased by 21.7 percent to approximately $3.4 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to approximately $2.8 billion in the same period in 2014, and increased by 26.0 percent to approximately $6.5 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to approximately $5.2 billion in the same period in 2014. Net investment income increased to approximately $16.4 million and $29.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared with approximately $12.0 million and $23.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, primarily due to larger investments-available-for-sale balances during these periods.
Our government contracts revenues decreased by 8.5 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2015 to approximately $141.1 million from approximately $154.1 million in the same period in 2014 and decreased by 0.8 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2015 to approximately $295.8 million from approximately $298.2 million in the same period in 2014. Our government contracts costs increased by 3.0 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2015 to approximately $137.3 million from approximately $133.2 million in the same period in 2014 and increased by 5.5 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2015 to approximately $279.8 million from approximately $265.2 million in the same period in 2014. The decreases in government contract revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 were primarily due to lower incentives on the T-3 contract, partially offset by increased revenues from the PC3 Program. The increases in government contract costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 were primarily due to increased services provided under the PC3 Program. For additional information see “—Government Contracts Reportable Segment".
Our general and administrative (G&A) expenses increased by $104.0 million, or 30.2 percent, in the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014 and increased by $196.8 million, or 27.9 percent, in the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014, primarily due to increases in premium taxes, increases in the health insurer fee which is based on the prior calendar year premiums, as well as expenses related to the Cognizant Transaction (see "—Overview—Cognizant Transaction" and Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements). See "—Overview—Health Care Reform Legislation and Implementation" for more information regarding the health insurer fee.

46



Days Claims Payable
Days claims payable ("DCP") for the second quarter of 2015 was 47.6 days compared with 49.0 days in the second quarter of 2014. Adjusted DCP, which we calculate in accordance with the paragraph below, for the second quarter of 2015 was 59.1 days compared with 64.4 days in the second quarter of 2014. The decreases in our DCP and adjusted DCP are primarily due to the increase in health plan services cost, partially offset by an increase in reserves for claims and other settlements, which resulted from enrollment growth.
Set forth below is a reconciliation of adjusted DCP, a non-GAAP financial measure, to the comparable GAAP financial measure, DCP. DCP is calculated by dividing the amount of reserve for claims and other settlements ("Claims Reserve") by health plan services cost ("Health Plan Costs") during the quarter and multiplying that amount by the number of days in the quarter. In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the following table presents an adjusted DCP metric that subtracts capitation and Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug ("MAPD") payables/costs from the Claims Reserve and Health Plan Costs. Management believes that adjusted DCP provides useful information to investors because the adjusted DCP calculation excludes from both Claims Reserve and Health Plan Costs amounts related to health care costs for which no or minimal reserves are maintained. Therefore, management believes that adjusted DCP may present a more accurate reflection of DCP than does GAAP DCP, which includes such amounts. This non-GAAP financial information should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. You are encouraged to evaluate these adjustments and the reasons we consider them appropriate for supplemental analysis. In evaluating the adjusted amounts, you should be aware that we have incurred expenses that are the same as or similar to some of the adjustments in the current presentation and we may incur them again in the future. Our presentation of the adjusted amounts should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or nonrecurring items.
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
(Dollars in millions)
Reconciliation of Adjusted Days Claims Payable:
 
 
 
(1) Reserve for Claims and Other Settlements—GAAP
$
1,757.9

 
$
1,488.3

Less: Capitation and MAPD Payables
(374.4
)
 
(351.7
)
(2) Reserve for Claims and Other Settlements—Adjusted
$
1,383.5

 
$
1,136.6

(3) Health Plan Services Cost—GAAP
$
3,363.7

 
$
2,763.2

Less: Capitation and MAPD Costs
(1,233.0
)
 
(1,156.0
)
(4) Health Plan Services Cost—Adjusted
$
2,130.7

 
$
1,607.2

(5) Number of Days in Period
91

 
91

(1) / (3) * (5) Days Claims Payable—GAAP (using end of period reserve amount)
47.6

 
49.0

(2) / (4) * (5) Days Claims Payable—Adjusted (using end of period reserve amount)
59.1

 
64.4


47



Income Tax Provision
Our income tax expense and the effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
(Dollars in millions)
Income tax expense (benefit)
$
73.7

 
$
(22.1
)
 
$
111.5

 
$
11.1

Effective income tax rate
55.8
%
 
(22.3
)%
 
55.8
%
 
6.9
%
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, our effective tax rate was impacted by the health insurer fee which became effective under the ACA. The fee is not deductible for federal income tax purposes and in many state jurisdictions. The non-deductible health insurer fee increased our effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 by 17.4 percentage points and 17.2 percentage points, respectively, compared with 13.7 percentage points and 14.0 percentage points for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. See Note 2, under the heading "Accounting for Certain Provisions of the ACA—Premium-based Fee on Health Insurers" for additional information regarding the health insurer fee. Our effective tax rate was affected favorably for the three months ended June 30, 2014 by 73.5 percentage points due to a loss on the stock of one of our subsidiaries that created a tax benefit of $72.6 million, net of adjustments to our reserve for uncertain tax benefits. Other items that caused our effective tax rate to differ from the statutory federal tax rate of 35% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 include state income taxes, tax-exempt interest and non-deductible compensation. See Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

48



Western Region Operations Reportable Segment
Our Western Region Operations segment includes the operations of our commercial, Medicare, Medicaid and dual eligibles health plans, the operations of our health and life insurance companies primarily in California, Arizona, Oregon and Washington, and our pharmaceutical services subsidiary and certain operations of our behavioral health subsidiaries in several states including Arizona, California, Oregon and Washington.
Western Region Operations Segment Membership (in thousands) 
 
As of
June 30, 2015
 
As of
June 30, 2014
 
Increase/
(Decrease)
 
%
Change
California
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Large Group
444

 
492

 
(48
)
 
(9.8
)%
Small Group
241

 
240

 
1

 
0.4
 %
Individual
279

 
272

 
7

 
2.6
 %
Commercial
964

 
1,004

 
(40
)
 
(4.0
)%
Medicare Advantage
168

 
162

 
6

 
3.7
 %
Medi-Cal/Medicaid
1,712

 
1,359

 
353

 
26.0
 %
Dual Eligibles
27

 
2

 
25

 
1,250.0
 %
Total California
2,871

 
2,527

 
344

 
13.6
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Arizona
 
 
 
 

 

Large Group
36

 
48

 
(12
)
 
(25.0
)%
Small Group
37

 
43

 
(6
)
 
(14.0
)%
Individual
69

 
99

 
(30
)
 
(30.3
)%
Commercial
142

 
190

 
(48
)
 
(25.3
)%
Medicare Advantage
38

 
46

 
(8
)
 
(17.4
)%
Medicaid
76

 
45

 
31

 
68.9
 %
Total Arizona
256

 
281

 
(25
)
 
(8.9
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Northwest
 
 
 
 

 


Large Group
27

 
28

 
(1
)
 
(3.6
)%
Small Group
22

 
25

 
(3
)
 
(12.0
)%
Individual
2

 
4

 
(2
)
 
(50.0
)%
Commercial
51

 
57

 
(6
)
 
(10.5
)%
Medicare Advantage
63

 
54

 
9

 
16.7
 %
Total Northwest
114

 
111

 
3

 
2.7
 %
 
 
 
 
 

 


Total Health Plan Enrollment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Large Group
507

 
568

 
(61
)
 
(10.7
)%
Small Group
300

 
308

 
(8
)
 
(2.6
)%
Individual
350

 
375

 
(25
)
 
(6.7
)%
Commercial
1,157

 
1,251

 
(94
)
 
(7.5
)%
Medicare Advantage
269

 
262

 
7

 
2.7
 %
Medi-Cal/Medicaid
1,788

 
1,404

 
384

 
27.4
 %
Dual Eligibles
27

 
2

 
25

 
1,250.0
 %
 
3,241

 
2,919

 
322

 
11.0
 %


49



Total Western Region Operations enrollment was approximately 3.2 million members at June 30, 2015, an increase of 11.0 percent compared with enrollment at June 30, 2014. Total enrollment in our California health plans increased by 13.6 percent to approximately 2.9 million members from June 30, 2014 to June 30, 2015.
Western Region Operations commercial enrollment decreased by 7.5 percent from June 30, 2014 to approximately 1.2 million members at June 30, 2015, primarily due to membership decreases in our large group and individual businesses.
Enrollment in our large group business decreased by 10.7 percent, or approximately 61,000 members, from approximately 568,000 members at June 30, 2014 to approximately 507,000 members at June 30, 2015 due to competitive pricing in California. Enrollment in our small group business in our Western Region Operations segment decreased by 2.6 percent, from approximately 308,000 members at June 30, 2014 to approximately 300,000 members at June 30, 2015. Enrollment in our individual business in our Western Region Operations segment decreased by 6.7 percent, from approximately 375,000 members at June 30, 2014 to approximately 350,000 members at June 30, 2015 primarily due to declines in Arizona as a result of competitive pricing on the individual exchange. As of June 30, 2015, membership in our tailored network products accounted for 54.7 percent of our Western Region Operations commercial enrollment compared with 52.5 percent at June 30, 2014.
Enrollment in our Medicare Advantage plans in our Western Region Operations segment at June 30, 2015 was approximately 269,000 members, an increase of 2.7 percent compared with approximately 262,000 members at June 30, 2014. This increase was due to gains of approximately 9,000 members in the Northwest and 6,000 members in California, partially offset by a loss of 8,000 members in Arizona. We have exited certain under-performing counties in our Medicare business, and consequently expected lower enrollment in our Medicare Advantage plans in 2015.
Enrollment in our state Medicaid program in California ("Medi-Cal") increased by approximately 353,000 members, or 26.0 percent, to approximately 1,712,000 members at June 30, 2015 compared with approximately 1,359,000 members at June 30, 2014, primarily as a result of new members added from Medicaid expansion. We expect that our Medi-Cal enrollment for the remainder of 2015 will be impacted by the state of California’s efforts to redetermine enrollee eligibility for the state’s Medicaid program. In addition, in October 2013, we began administering Medicaid benefits in Maricopa County, Arizona pursuant to our contract with AHCCCS. As of June 30, 2015, we had approximately 76,000 Medicaid members in Arizona compared with approximately 45,000 members as of June 30, 2014. On February 4, 2015, we received a notice from the AHCCCS Division of Health Care Management that stated that we were in violation of our Medicaid contract in Maricopa County. As a result, we are currently subject to sanctions that include a cap on member auto assignments under the contract effective as of February 13, 2015 until further notice.
We are the sole commercial plan contractor with DHCS to provide Medi-Cal services in Los Angeles County, California. As of June 30, 2015, approximately 925,000 of our Medi-Cal members resided in Los Angeles County, representing approximately 54 percent of our Medi-Cal membership. As part of our 2012 settlement agreement with DHCS, DHCS agreed, among other things, to the extension of all of our existing Medi-Cal managed care contracts, including our contract with DHCS to provide Medi-Cal services in Los Angeles County, for an additional five years from their then existing expiration dates. Accordingly, our Medi-Cal contract for Los Angeles County is scheduled to expire in April 2019. For additional information on our settlement agreement with DHCS, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements under the heading "Health Plan Services Revenue Recognition."
As more fully described below, in 2012, the California legislature enacted the Coordinated Care Initiative, or “CCI.” The CCI is being implemented in seven counties, including Los Angeles and San Diego counties. In participating counties, the CCI established a voluntary “dual eligibles demonstration,” and in April 2012, DHCS selected us to participate in the dual eligibles demonstration for both Los Angeles and San Diego counties. Active enrollment in Los Angeles and San Diego counties for the dual eligible demonstrations commenced on April 1, 2014. As of June 30, 2015, we had approximately 27,000 dual eligibles members. See "—California Coordinated Care Initiative," below for more information on the CCI and the dual eligibles.
California Coordinated Care Initiative
In 2012, the California legislature enacted the CCI. The stated purpose of the CCI is to provide a more efficient health care delivery system and improved coordination of care to individuals that are fully eligible for Medicare and Medi-Cal benefits, or "dual eligibles," as well as to all Medi-Cal only beneficiaries who rely on long-term services and supports, or “LTSS,” which includes institutional long-term care and home and community-based services and other support services.
In participating counties, the CCI established a voluntary “dual eligibles demonstration,” also referred to as the “Cal MediConnect” program, to coordinate medical, behavioral health, long-term institutional, and home- and

50



community-based services for dual eligibles through a single health plan, and will require that all Medi-Cal beneficiaries in participating counties join a Medi-Cal managed care health plan to receive their Medi-Cal benefits, including LTSS. The CCI is being implemented in seven counties, including Los Angeles and San Diego counties. On April 4, 2012, DHCS selected us to participate in the dual eligibles demonstration for both Los Angeles and San Diego counties. In December 2013, Health Net Community Solutions, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, entered into a three-way agreement with DHCS and CMS, which was subsequently amended on January 13, 2014 (the “Cal MediConnect Contract”). Among other things, under the Cal MediConnect Contract we have received and expect to continue to receive prospective blended capitated payments to provide coverage for dual eligibles in Los Angeles and San Diego counties. These blended capitated payments are determined based on our mix of membership.
Active enrollment in Los Angeles and San Diego counties for the dual eligibles demonstrations commenced on April 1, 2014, and is scheduled to conclude at the end of 2017. During the active enrollment period, dual eligibles in Los Angeles County are able to either choose among us, the local health plan initiative, or one of three other health plans for benefits under the dual eligibles demonstration. On July 1, 2014, DHCS began automatically enrolling dual eligibles in Los Angeles County who have not selected a health plan, which we refer to as “passive enrollment.” Dual eligibles also may choose to “opt out” of the demonstration at any time. Such dual eligibles will then continue to receive fee-for-service Medicare benefits but will receive Medi-Cal benefits through a managed care health plan as required under the CCI. During the active enrollment period in San Diego County, dual eligibles are able to select to receive benefits from any one of four health plan options, including us, or “opt out” of the demonstration. Passive enrollment has concluded in both Los Angeles and San Diego counties. For the remainder of the demonstration, all dual eligibles, including newly eligible individuals, individuals who have previously selected or been passively enrolled in a health plan and individuals who have previously opted out of the demonstration, have the continuing option to select from the Cal MediConnect health plans available in their county or "opt out" of the demonstration. As of July 1, 2015, we were administering benefits to 42% of the Cal MediConnect enrollments in Los Angeles County and 20% of the enrollments in San Diego County.
The financial performance of the Cal MediConnect Contract is included in the calculation of the settlement account that was established pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement entered into by DHCS, HNCS and Health Net of California, Inc. on November 2, 2012, which is further discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements under the heading "Health Plan Services Revenue Recognition.”
Health Net’s participation in the CCI, and the dual eligibles demonstration in particular, represents a significant business opportunity for us, but is subject to a number of risks inherent in untested health care initiatives, particularly those that involve new populations with limited cost experience. Moreover, the CCI and the dual eligibles demonstration program in particular, is a model of providing health care that is new to beneficiaries, providers, regulatory authorities and health plans in the state of California, and involves risks generally associated with government programs. For example, larger than expected numbers of dual eligibles opted out of the demonstration during passive enrollment in Los Angeles and San Diego counties, which impacted our expected enrollment for 2014 and the first half of 2015. We have worked with DHCS and others to implement outreach and other programs designed to increase our Cal MediConnect enrollment, but if enrollment continues below expectations over the course of the demonstration, our overall profitability with respect to our participation in the CCI may be lower than originally anticipated. Due to these and other risks associated with the CCI, including, without limitation, that the dual eligibles demonstration is a pilot program subject to changing legislation and state budgetary concerns, there can be no assurance that the business opportunity presented by the CCI, including the dual eligibles demonstration, will prove to be successful. Our failure to successfully adapt to the requirements of the CCI could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation. For a discussion of this and other risks related to our participation in the CCI, see "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Form 10-K.

51



Western Region Operations Segment Results
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
(Dollars in thousands, except PMPM data)
Commercial premiums
$
1,412,920

 
$
1,377,460

 
$
2,745,914

 
$
2,641,637

Medicare premiums
782,412

 
757,194

 
1,551,297

 
1,512,352

Medicaid premiums
1,673,083

 
1,121,912

 
3,144,437

 
1,983,922

Dual Eligibles premiums
135,017

 
5,312

 
282,584

 
5,312

Health plan services premiums
4,003,432

 
3,261,878

 
7,724,232

 
6,143,223

Net investment income
16,424

 
12,043

 
29,665

 
23,145

Administrative services fees and other income
2,712

 
(6,612
)
 
3,853

 
(4,214
)
Total revenues
4,022,568

 
3,267,309

 
7,757,750

 
6,162,154

Health plan services
3,363,742

 
2,763,179

 
6,506,605

 
5,165,521

Premium tax
67,954

 
31,930

 
126,371

 
74,388

Health insurer fee
58,500

 
37,844

 
116,320

 
74,137

Other ACA fees
21,495

 
22,546

 
42,312

 
45,073

Administrative expenses
274,610

 
249,665

 
547,124

 
506,259

Total general and administrative
422,559

 
341,985

 
832,127

 
699,857

Selling
69,190

 
64,002

 
137,886

 
128,154

Depreciation and amortization
3,958

 
9,641

 
7,958

 
19,304

Interest
8,412

 
7,826

 
16,461

 
15,647

Total expenses
3,867,861

 
3,186,633

 
7,501,037

 
6,028,483

Income from operations before income taxes
154,707

 
80,676

 
256,713

 
133,671

Income tax provision
82,300

 
42,874

 
133,661

 
72,245

Net income
$
72,407

 
$
37,802

 
$
123,052

 
$
61,426

Pretax margin
3.8
%
 
2.5
%
 
3.3
%
 
2.2
%
Western Region Operations premium yield
8.0
%
 
10.8
%
 
7.4
%
 
7.9
%
Western Region Operations premium per member per month (PMPM) (d)
$
414.68

 
$
384.03

 
$
405.82

 
$
377.77

Western Region Operations health care cost trend
7.1
%
 
10.5
%
 
7.6
%
 
6.0
%
Western Region Operations health care cost PMPM (d)
$
348.42

 
$
325.32

 
$
341.84

 
$
317.65

Western Region Operations health plan services MCR (a)
84.0
%
 
84.7
%
 
84.2
%
 
84.1
%
Administrative expense ratio (b)
6.9
%
 
7.7
%
 
7.1
%
 
8.2
%
Total G&A expense ratio (b)
10.5
%
 
10.5
%
 
10.8
%
 
11.4
%
Selling costs ratio (c)
1.7
%
 
2.0
%
 
1.8
%
 
2.1
%
 
_________________
(a)
Western Region Operations medical care ratio ("MCR") is calculated as health plan services cost divided by health plan services premiums revenue.
(b)
Administrative expense and Total G&A expense ratios are computed as either administrative expenses or total general and administrative expenses divided by the sum of health plan services premiums revenue and administrative services fees and other income.
(c)
The selling costs ratio is computed as selling expenses divided by health plan services premiums revenue.
(d)
Per member per month ("PMPM") is calculated based on member months.


52



Revenues
Total revenues in our Western Region Operations segment increased 23.1 percent to approximately $4.0 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and increased 25.9 percent to approximately $7.8 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014 primarily due to an increase in our premium revenues in our health plans.
Health plan services premium revenues in our Western Region Operations segment increased 22.7 percent to approximately $4.0 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and increased 25.7 percent to approximately $7.7 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same periods in 2014 primarily due to enrollment growth from Medicaid expansion, dual eligibles and the individual ACA exchanges. Our MLR rebate liability, which is payable to DHCS in connection with Medicaid adult expansion members decreased by $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and increased by $60.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. No MLR rebates were recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, we accrued $10.0 million and $25.8 million for excess profit sharing, which is payable to the state of Arizona under our Arizona Medicaid contract. Due to the combined impact of these MLR rebates and profit sharing provisions in Arizona, Medicaid premium revenue was reduced by $7.5 million and $86.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared with $6.6 million and $8.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively related to MLR rebates and excess profit sharing. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, retroactive premium adjustments for our Medi-Cal member risk reassignment for prior periods increased premium revenue by $2.6 million and $29.8 million, respectively. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, under the heading "Health Plan Services Revenue Recognition" for more information.
Investment income in our Western Region Operations segment increased to $16.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from $12.0 million and increased to $29.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $23.1 million for the same periods in 2014 primarily due to larger investments-available-for-sale balances.
Administrative services fees and other income in our Western Region Operations segment increased to $2.7 million and $3.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, from $(6.6) million and $(4.2) million, respectively, for the same periods in 2014. The administrative services fees and other income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 were negative due to the reversal of certain ACA administrative fee income booked in the first quarter of 2014 and the fourth quarter of 2013 as discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements under the heading "Accounting for Certain Provisions of the ACA—Section 1202 of the ACA."
Health Plan Services Expenses
Health plan services expenses in our Western Region Operations segment increased by 21.7 percent to $3.4 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and increased by 26.0 percent to $6.5 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to $2.8 billion and $5.2 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, primarily due to enrollment growth from Medicaid expansion and dual eligibles.
Premium Yields and Health Care Cost Trends
Our Western Region Operations premium PMPM increased by 8.0 percent to $415 for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to an increase of 10.8 percent to $384 for the same period in 2014. Western Region Operations premium PMPM increased by 7.4 percent to $406 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to an increase of 7.9 percent to $378 for the same period in 2014.
Western Region Operations health care cost PMPM increased by 7.1 percent to $348 for the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to an increase of 10.5 percent to $325 for the same period in 2014. Health care cost PMPM increased by 7.6 percent to $342 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to an increase of 6.0 percent to $318 for the same period in 2014.
The change in the premium yields and health care cost trends reflect the ongoing product mix change associated with our membership growth.
Medical Care Ratios
The Western Region Operations health plan services MCR was 84.0 percent and 84.2 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared with 84.7 percent and 84.1 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. The improvement in the three months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014 is primarily due to improved performance in our Medicaid business.

53



General and Administrative, Selling and Interest Expenses
Total general and administrative expense in our Western Region Operations segment was $422.6 million and $832.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared with $342.0 million and $699.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. The total G&A expense ratio was 10.5 percent and 10.8 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to 10.5 percent and 11.4 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. The increases in our total general and administrative expenses were primarily due to increases in the health insurer fee and premium taxes.
Selling expense in our Western Region Operations segment was $69.2 million and $137.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared with $64.0 million and $128.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. The selling costs ratio was 1.7 percent and 1.8 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared with 2.0 percent and 2.1 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.
Interest expense in our Western Region Operations segment was $8.4 million and $16.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared with $7.8 million and $15.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.
Government Contracts Reportable Segment
On April 1, 2011, we began delivery of administrative services under our T-3 contract. The T-3 contract was awarded to us on May 13, 2010, and included five one-year option periods. On March 15, 2014, the Department of Defense exercised the last of these options, which extended the T-3 contract through March 31, 2015. In March 2015, the DoD modified our T-3 contract to add three additional one-year option periods and awarded us the first of the three option periods, which allows us to continue providing access to health care services to TRICARE beneficiaries through March 31, 2016. If the two remaining option periods are ultimately exercised, the T-3 contract would conclude on March 31, 2018. On April 24, 2015, the DoD issued its final request for proposal for the next generation TRICARE contract (the "T-2017 contracts"). On July 23, 2015, we responded to the DoD's request for proposal, which will reduce the three existing TRICARE regions to two regions. The DoD anticipates it will award the T-2017 contracts in the first quarter of 2016, with health care delivery commencing on April 1, 2017. If we are not successful in securing a contract on favorable terms during the rebidding process, our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition could be adversely impacted. See "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Form 10-K for additional discussion of this and certain other risks related to our participation in TRICARE and other government programs.
Under the T-3 contract for the TRICARE North Region, we provide administrative services to approximately 2.8 million MHS eligible beneficiaries as of June 30, 2015. For a description of the T-3 contract, see "—Overview—How We Measure Our Profitability.”
On August 15, 2012, our wholly owned subsidiary, MHN Government Services, Inc. entered into a new contract to provide counseling services to military service members and their families under the MFLC program with a five-year term that includes a 12-month base period and four 12-month option periods. MHN Government Services, Inc. is one of three contractors initially selected to participate in the MFLC program under the current MFLC contract. Revenues from the MFLC contract were $28.7 million and $57.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, compared to $31.9 million and $61.4 million for the three and six month ended June 30, 2014, respectively.
In September 2013, VA awarded us a contract under its new PC3 Program. The PC3 Program provides eligible veterans coordinated, timely access to care through a comprehensive network of non-VA providers who meet VA quality standards when a local VA medical center cannot readily provide the care. We support VA in providing care to veterans in three of the six PC3 Program regions. These three regions, Regions 1, 2 and 4, encompass all or portions of 37 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. The PC3 Program contract term includes a base period of performance through September 30, 2014 and four one-year option periods that may be exercised by VA. On September 23, 2014, the VA exercised option period 1 which commenced on October 1, 2014 and is scheduled to end on September 30, 2015. On July 27, 2015, VA notified us of its intent to exercise option period 2, which would commence on October 1, 2015 and would be scheduled to end on September 30, 2016. In addition to the one-year option periods, VA will have the ability to extend the PC3 Program contract an additional two years and six months based on VA's needs. In August 2014, VA expanded our PC3 Program contract to include primary care services for veterans who are unable to obtain primary care at a VA medical center in the three PC3 regions in which we operate. In addition, in November 2014, we modified our PC3 Program contract to further expand our services with VA in support of the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014 ("VACAA"). The VACAA modification to our PC3 contract

54



expires no later than September 30, 2017. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we had $21.5 million and $39.6 million, respectively, in revenues from the PC3 Program compared to $3.5 million and $5.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. This increase was driven primarily by the increased services related to the VACAA modification.
Government Contracts Segment Results
The following table summarizes the operating results for the Government Contracts segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Government contracts revenues
$
141,055

 
$
154,083

 
$
295,769

 
$
298,173

Government contracts costs
137,248

 
132,634

 
278,935

 
263,704

Income from operations before income taxes
3,807

 
21,449

 
16,834

 
34,469

Income tax provision
1,587

 
8,942

 
6,993

 
14,328

Net income
$
2,220

 
$
12,507

 
$
9,841

 
$
20,141

Government contracts revenues decreased by $13.0 million, or 8.5 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and decreased by $2.4 million, or 0.8 percent, for the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the same periods in 2014. Government contracts costs increased by $4.6 million, or 3.5 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and increased by $15.2 million, or 5.8 percent, for the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the same periods in 2014. The decreases in government contract revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 were primarily due to lower incentives on the T-3 contract, partially offset by increased revenues from the PC3 Program. The increases in government contract costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 were primarily due to costs associated with the ramp-up of operations associated with the PC3 Program. These higher costs were driven by VA's expedited implementation of the VACAA modification of the PC3 Program, and we expect these higher costs to continue through the second half of 2015. In total, we expect to spend approximately $40 million in start-up costs in 2015, which will not recur in 2016.
Corporate/Other
The following table summarizes the Corporate/Other segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Costs included in government contract costs
$
14

 
$
574

 
$
867

 
$
1,478

Costs included in G&A
26,154

 
2,749

 
70,434

 
5,900

Depreciation and amortization
244

 

 
551

 

Asset impairment

 

 
1,884

 

Loss from operations before income taxes
(26,412
)
 
(3,323
)
 
(73,736
)
 
(7,378
)
Income tax benefit
(10,153
)
 
(73,881
)
 
(29,199
)
 
(75,465
)
Net loss
$
(16,259
)
 
$
70,558

 
$
(44,537
)
 
$
68,087

Our Corporate/Other segment is not a business operating segment. It is added to our reportable segments to reconcile to our consolidated results. The Corporate/Other segment includes costs that are excluded from the calculation of segment pretax income because they are not managed within the reportable segments.

55



Our Corporate/Other segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 primarily includes expenses related to the Cognizant Transaction. See Note 3 and Note 11 to our consolidated financial statement and "—Overview—Cognizant Transaction" for additional information regarding the Cognizant Transaction.
Our Corporate/Other segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 were primarily impacted by severance expenses related to our efforts to address scale issues. Our Corporate/Other segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 also included a tax benefit of $72.6 million, net of adjustments to our reserve for uncertain tax benefits, created by a loss on the stock of one of our subsidiaries.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity
Our primary sources of cash include receipts of premiums, services revenue, and investment and other income, as well as proceeds from the sale or maturity of our investment securities and borrowings. We believe that expected cash flow from operating activities, existing cash reserves and other working capital and lines of credit are adequate to allow us to fund existing obligations, repurchase shares of our common stock, introduce new products and services, enter into new lines of business and continue to operate and develop health care-related businesses as we may determine to be appropriate at least for the next 12 months. We regularly evaluate cash requirements for, among other things, current operations and commitments, for acquisitions and other strategic transactions, to address legislative or regulatory changes such as the ACA, and for business expansion opportunities, such as the CCI, Medicaid expansion under the ACA and our participation in Arizona's Medicaid program in Maricopa County. We may elect to raise additional funds for these and other purposes, either through issuance of debt or equity, the sale of investment securities or otherwise, as appropriate. In addition, we may strategically pursue refinancing opportunities to extend maturities and/or improve terms of our indebtedness if we believe such opportunities are favorable to us. Based on the composition and quality of our investment portfolio, our expected ability to liquidate our investment portfolio as needed, and our expected operating and financing cash flows, we do not anticipate any liquidity constraints in the near term. However, turbulence in U.S. and international markets and certain costs associated with health care reform legislation and its implementation, our participation in the CCI, Medicaid expansion under the ACA and our preparation for the Cognizant Transaction, among other things, could adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, as a holding company, our subsidiaries conduct substantially all of our consolidated operations and own substantially all of our consolidated assets. Consequently, our cash flow and our ability to pay our debt depends, in part, on the amount of cash that we receive from our subsidiaries. We are dependent upon dividends and management fees from our regulated subsidiaries, most of which are subject to regulatory restrictions. For a discussion of these and other risks that impact our liquidity, see "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Form 10-K.
Our cash flow from operating activities is impacted by, among other things, the timing of collections on our amounts receivable from state and federal governments and agencies. For example, our receivable from DHCS and AHCCCS related to our California and Arizona Medicaid businesses totaled $241.7 million as of June 30, 2015 and $801.7 million as of December 31, 2014. The receivable from CMS related to our Medicare business was $146.3 million as of June 30, 2015 and $119.1 million as of December 31, 2014. Our Government Contracts receivable, including receivables from the DoD relating to our current and prior contracts for the TRICARE North Region, was $223.2 million as of June 30, 2015 and $150.5 million as of December 31, 2014. The timing of collection of such receivables from the federal and state governments and agencies is impacted by government audits as well as government appropriations, allocation and funding processes, among other things, and can extend for periods beyond a year.
In addition, we believe that our cash flow in 2015 will be impacted, among other things, by the timing of payments related to the ACA. The largest of the ACA taxes and fees is the health insurer fee. Our allocable share of the 2014 health insurer fee, based upon 2013 premiums, was $141.4 million. We paid that amount in September 2014. We currently estimate that our allocable share of the health insurer fee payable in 2015, based upon 2014 premiums, is approximately $232.6 million, and is expected to be paid in a single lump sum payment in September 2015. Our cash flow is also impacted by the determination and settlement of amounts related to the premium stabilization provisions in the ACA. Our receivable balance for the reinsurance program related to the premium stabilization provisions of the ACA was $300.6 million and $234.0 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. If the per capita premiums/contributions paid by all insurers, including self-funded plans, are insufficient to fund all recoverable amounts, then this will result in pro-rata reduction of recoverable amounts for insurers for the following year. Our net receivable balance for the risk corridor program related to the premium stabilization provisions of the ACA was $178.9 million and $86.8 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. HHS recognizes, in both final regulations and guidance, it is obligated to make the risk corridors program payments without regard to budget

56



neutrality. Although HHS anticipates the program will be budget neutral, the ACA requires HHS to make full payments to those issuers with risk corridors receivable. Additionally, HHS states in final regulations and guidance that if the program’s collections, including any potential carryover from prior years, are insufficient to satisfy its payment obligations, the agency will use other sources of funding to meet its payment obligations, subject to the availability of appropriations. If corridor collections are insufficient in 2015, HHS explains that it shall fulfill its obligations for the 2014 benefit year by using funds collected for the 2015 benefit year prior to making payments on 2015 obligations. Our net payable balance for the risk adjustment program related to the premium stabilization provisions of the ACA was $139.4 million and $72.4 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, under the heading "Accounting for Certain Provisions of the ACA" for additional information regarding ACA-related fees and premium stabilization provisions. Depending on the amounts due or payable as a result of these provisions, our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Cash and Investments
As of June 30, 2015, the fair value of our investment securities available-for-sale was $2.4 billion, which includes both current and noncurrent investments. Noncurrent investments were $6.5 million as of June 30, 2015. We hold high-quality fixed income securities primarily comprised of corporate bonds, asset-backed securities, mortgage-backed bonds, municipal bonds and bank loans. We evaluate and determine the classification of our investments based on management’s intent. We also closely monitor the fair values of our investment holdings and regularly evaluate them for other-than-temporary impairments.
Our cash flow from investing activities is primarily impacted by the sales, maturities and purchases of our available-for-sale investment securities and restricted investments. Our investment objective is to maintain safety and preservation of principal by investing in a diversified mix of high-quality fixed-income securities, which are largely investment grade, while maintaining liquidity in each portfolio sufficient to meet our cash flow requirements and attaining an expected total return on invested funds.
Our investment holdings are currently primarily comprised of investment grade securities with an average rating of “A+” and “A1” as rated by S&P and/or Moody’s, respectively. At this time, there is no indication of default on interest and/or principal payments under our holdings. We have the ability and current intent to hold to recovery all securities with an unrealized loss position. As of June 30, 2015, our investment portfolio includes $622.8 million, or 26.2% of our portfolio holdings, of mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. The majority of our mortgage-backed securities are Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae issues, and the average rating of our entire asset-backed securities is AA+/Aa1. However, any failure by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac to honor the obligations under the securities they have issued or guaranteed could cause a significant decline in the value or cash flow of our mortgage-backed securities. As of June 30, 2015, our investment portfolio also included $981.5 million, or 41.3% of our portfolio holdings, of obligations of states and other political subdivisions and $745.5 million, or 31.3% of our portfolio holdings, of corporate debt securities.
We had gross unrealized losses of $19.3 million as of June 30, 2015 and $9.8 million as of December 31, 2014. Included in the gross unrealized losses as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were $1.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively, related to noncurrent investments available-for-sale. We believe that these impairments are temporary and we do not intend to sell these investments. It is not likely that we will be required to sell any security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. Given the current market conditions and the significant judgments involved, there is a continuing risk that further declines in fair value may occur and additional other-than-temporary impairments, which may be material, may be recorded in future periods. No impairment was recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 or 2014.

57



Operating Activities
Our net cash flow provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014 is as follows:
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
Change Period over Period
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
600.3

 
$
297.7

 
$
302.6

Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $302.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014, primarily due to the receipt of ACA 1202 payments and the timing of other Medi-Cal payments, partially reduced by the decrease in reserves for claims and other settlements.
Investing Activities
Our net cash flow used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014 is as follows:
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
Change Period over Period
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
Net cash used in investing activities
$
(753.3
)
 
$
(21.7
)
 
$
(731.6
)
Net cash used in investing activities increased by $731.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014, primarily due to a $726.9 million increase in net purchases of available-for-sale investments.
Financing Activities
Our net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014 is as follows:
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
Change Period over Period
 
2015
 
2014
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
$
40.7

 
$
(106.1
)
 
$
146.8

Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $146.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014, primarily due to a $114.0 million net increase in cash provided by customer funds administered and a $110.0 million increase in net borrowings under our revolving credit facility, partially offset by a $99.5 million increase in share repurchases under our stock repurchase program.
Capital Structure
Our debt-to-total capital ratio was 26.3 percent as of June 30, 2015 compared with 22.6 percent as of December 31, 2014. This increase is primarily due to an increase in borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
Stock Repurchases. On May 2, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized our stock repurchase program pursuant to which a total of $300 million of our outstanding common stock could be repurchased. On March 8, 2012, our Board of Directors approved a $323.7 million increase to our stock repurchase program and on December 16, 2014, our Board of Directors approved another $257.8 million increase to our stock repurchase program. This latest increase, when taken together with the remaining authorization at that time, brought our total authorization up to $400.0 million.
During the three months ended June 30, 2015, we made no share repurchases and during the six months ended June 30, 2015, we repurchased approximately 1.7 million shares of our common stock for aggregate consideration of $93.8 million under our stock repurchase program. The remaining authorization under our stock repurchase program as of June 30, 2015 was $306.2 million. We primarily funded these repurchases through our revolving credit facility. Our

58



stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time, and we have suspended repurchases for the remainder of 2015 in connection with the announced Merger with Centene. For additional information on our stock repurchase program, see Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements.
Under our various stock option and long-term incentive plans, in certain circumstances, employees and non-employee directors may elect for the Company to withhold shares to satisfy minimum statutory federal, state and local tax withholding and/or exercise price obligations, as applicable, arising from the exercise of stock options. For certain other equity awards, we have the right to withhold shares to satisfy any tax obligations that may be required to be withheld or paid in connection with such equity award, including any tax obligation arising on the vesting date. These repurchases were not part of our stock repurchase program.
The following table presents monthly information related to repurchases of our common stock, including shares withheld by the Company to satisfy tax withholdings and exercise price obligations, for the three month period ending June 30, 2015:
Period
 
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased (a)
 
 
Average
Price Paid
per Share
 
Total
Price Paid
 
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Programs (a)(b)
 
Maximum
Dollar Value of
Shares (or Units)
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Programs (b)
April 1—April 30
 
3,021
 
(c) 
$
55.15

 
$
166,614

 

 
$
306,182,333

May 1—May 31
 
3,153
 
(c) 
58.19

 
183,476

 

 
$
306,182,333

June 1—June 30
 
1,700
 
(c) 
64.10

 
108,962

 

 
$
306,182,333

 
 
7,874
 
 
$
58.30

 
$
459,052

 

 
 
 ________
(a)
During the three months ended June 30, 2015, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock outside our stock repurchase program, except shares withheld in connection with our various stock option and long-term incentive plans.
(b)
On May 2, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized our stock repurchase program, pursuant to which a total of $300.0 million of our common stock could be repurchased. On March 8, 2012, our Board of Directors approved a $323.7 million increase to our stock repurchase program. On December 16, 2014, our Board of Directors approved another $257.8 million increase to our stock repurchase program, which, when taken together with the remaining authorization at that time, brought our total authorization up to $400.0 million. Our stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date. During the three months ended June 30, 2015, we did not have any repurchase program expire, and we did not terminate any repurchase program prior to its expiration date.
(c)
Includes shares withheld by the Company to satisfy tax withholding and/or exercise price obligations arising from the vesting and/or exercise of restricted stock units, stock options and other equity awards.
Revolving Credit Facility. In October 2011, we entered into a $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility due in October 2016, which includes a $400 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit and a $50 million sublimit for swing line loans (which sublimits may be increased in connection with any increase in the credit facility described below). In addition, we have the ability from time to time to increase the credit facility by up to an additional $200 million in the aggregate, subject to the receipt of additional commitments. As of June 30, 2015, $210.0 million was outstanding under our revolving credit facility and the maximum amount available for borrowing under the revolving credit facility was $383.5 million (see "—Letters of Credit" below). As of July 30, 2015, we had $210.0 million in borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility.
Amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either (a) the base rate (which is a rate per annum equal to the greatest of (i) the federal funds rate plus one-half of one percent, (ii) Bank of America, N.A.’s “prime rate” and (iii) the Eurodollar Rate (as such term is defined in the credit facility) for a one-month interest period plus one percent) plus an applicable margin ranging from 45 to 105 basis points or (b) the Eurodollar Rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 145 to 205 basis points. The applicable margins are based on our consolidated leverage ratio, as specified in the credit facility, and are subject to adjustment following the Company’s delivery of a compliance certificate for each fiscal quarter.
Our revolving credit facility includes, among other customary terms and conditions, limitations (subject to specified exclusions) on our and our subsidiaries’ ability to incur debt; create liens; engage in certain mergers,

59



consolidations and acquisitions; sell or transfer assets; enter into agreements that restrict the ability to pay dividends or make or repay loans or advances; make investments, loans, and advances; engage in transactions with affiliates; and make dividends. In addition, we are required to be in compliance at the end of each fiscal quarter with a specified consolidated leverage ratio and consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio.
Our revolving credit facility contains customary events of default, including nonpayment of principal or other amounts when due; breach of covenants; inaccuracy of representations and warranties; cross-default and/or cross-acceleration to other indebtedness of the Company or our subsidiaries in excess of $50 million; certain ERISA-related events; noncompliance by the Company or any of our subsidiaries with any material term or provision of the HMO Regulations or Insurance Regulations (as each such term is defined in the credit facility) in a manner that could reasonably be expected to result in a material adverse effect; certain voluntary and involuntary bankruptcy events; inability to pay debts; undischarged, uninsured judgments greater than $50 million against us and/or our subsidiaries that are not stayed within 60 days; actual or asserted invalidity of any loan document; and a change of control. If an event of default occurs and is continuing under the revolving credit facility, the lenders thereunder may, among other things, terminate their obligations under the facility and require us to repay all amounts owed thereunder.
As of June 30, 2015, we were in compliance with all covenants under our revolving credit facility.
Letters of Credit
Pursuant to the terms of our revolving credit facility, we can obtain letters of credit in an aggregate amount of $400 million and the maximum amount available for borrowing is reduced by the dollar amount of any outstanding letters of credit. As of June 30, 2015 and July 30, 2015, we had outstanding letters of credit of $6.5 million and $6.5 million, respectively, resulting in a maximum amount available for borrowing of $383.5 million and $383.5 million as of June 30, 2015 and July 30, 2015, respectively. As of June 30, 2015 and July 30, 2015, no amount had been drawn on any of these letters of credit.
Senior Notes. We have issued $400 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.375% Senior Notes due 2017 (the “Senior Notes”). The indenture governing the Senior Notes limits our ability to incur certain liens, or consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets. In the event of the occurrence of both (1) a change of control of Health Net, Inc. and (2) a below investment grade rating by any two of Fitch, Inc., Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, within a specified period, we will be required to make an offer to purchase the Senior Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. As of June 30, 2015, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under the indenture governing the Senior Notes.
The Senior Notes may be redeemed in whole at any time or in part from time to time, prior to maturity at our option, at a redemption price equal to the greater of:
100% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes then outstanding to be redeemed; or
the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the Senior Notes to be redeemed (not including any portion of such payments of interest accrued to the date of redemption) discounted to the date of redemption on a semiannual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the applicable treasury rate plus 30 basis points
plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount being redeemed to the redemption date.
Each of the following will be an Event of Default under the indenture governing the Senior Notes:
failure to pay interest for 30 days after the date payment is due and payable; provided that an extension of an interest payment period by us in accordance with the terms of the Senior Notes shall not constitute a failure to pay interest;
failure to pay principal or premium, if any, on any note when due, either at maturity, upon any redemption, by declaration or otherwise;
failure to perform any other covenant or agreement in the notes or indenture for a period of 60 days after notice that performance was required;
(A) our failure or the failure of any of our subsidiaries to pay indebtedness for money we borrowed or any of our subsidiaries borrowed in an aggregate principal amount of at least $50 million, at the later of final maturity and the expiration of any related applicable grace period and such defaulted payment shall not have been made, waived or extended within 30 days after notice or (B) acceleration of the maturity of indebtedness for money we borrowed or any of our subsidiaries borrowed in an aggregate principal

60



amount of at least $50 million, if that acceleration results from a default under the instrument giving rise to or securing such indebtedness for money borrowed and such indebtedness has not been discharged in full or such acceleration has not been rescinded or annulled within 30 days after notice; or
events in bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of our Company.
On August 3, 2015, we commenced a solicitation with respect to the Senior Notes to amend the defined term "Change of Control" in the Senior Notes to provide that the Merger will not constitute a Change of Control. If the requisite consents are received, we intend to execute a supplement to the indenture governing the Senior Notes effecting the amendment, and accordingly, no Change of Control Offer (as defined in the Senior Notes) to repurchase the Senior Notes would be required in connection with the completion of the Merger. We are offering a cash payment of $2.50 per $1,000 in aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes for which a consent is validly delivered. The consent solicitation is scheduled to expire on August 12, 2015.
We are conducting the consent solicitation at the request of Centene pursuant to a covenant contained in the Merger Agreement. Centene has agreed that it will be responsible for all liabilities incurred by the Company in connection with the consent solicitation, including but not limited to all consent fees payable to holders of the Senior Notes.
Statutory Capital Requirements
Certain of our subsidiaries must comply with minimum capital and surplus requirements under applicable state laws and regulations, and must have adequate reserves for claims. As necessary, we make contributions to our subsidiaries to meet risk-based capital ("RBC") or other statutory capital requirements under state laws and regulations. We believe that as of July 30, 2015, all of our active health plans and insurance subsidiaries were in compliance with their respective regulatory requirements relating to maintenance of minimum capital standards, surplus requirements and adequate reserves for claims in all material respects.
By law, regulation and governmental policy, our health plan and insurance subsidiaries, which we refer to as our regulated subsidiaries, are required to maintain minimum levels of statutory capital and surplus. The minimum statutory capital and surplus requirements differ by state and are generally based on balances established by statute, a percentage of annualized premium revenue, a percentage of annualized health care costs, or RBC or tangible net equity (“TNE”) requirements. The RBC requirements are based on guidelines established by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. The RBC formula, which calculates asset risk, underwriting risk, credit risk, business risk and other factors, generates the authorized control level (“ACL”), which represents the minimum amount of capital and surplus believed to be required to support the regulated entity’s business. For states in which the RBC requirements have been adopted, the regulated entity typically must maintain the greater of the Company Action Level RBC, calculated as 200% of the ACL, or the minimum statutory capital and surplus requirement calculated pursuant to pre-RBC guidelines. Because our regulated subsidiaries also are subject to their state regulators’ overall oversight authority, some of our subsidiaries are required to maintain minimum capital and surplus in excess of the RBC requirement, even though RBC has been adopted in their states of domicile.
Under the California Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, as amended (“Knox-Keene”), certain of our California subsidiaries must comply with TNE requirements. Under these Knox-Keene TNE requirements, actual net worth less unsecured receivables and intangible assets must be more than the greater of (i) a fixed minimum amount, (ii) a minimum amount based on premiums or (iii) a minimum amount based on health care expenditures, excluding capitated amounts. In addition, certain of our California subsidiaries have made certain undertakings to the DMHC to restrict dividends and loans to affiliates, to the extent that the payment of such would reduce such entities' TNE below the minimum requirement or 130% of the minimum requirement. As of June 30, 2015 all of our subsidiaries subject to the TNE requirements and the undertakings to DMHC exceeded the minimum requirements.
Legislation may be enacted in certain states in which our subsidiaries operate imposing substantially increased minimum capital and/or statutory deposit requirements for HMOs in such states. Such statutory deposits may only be drawn upon under limited circumstances relating to the protection of policyholders.
As a result of the above requirements and other regulatory requirements, certain of our subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on their ability to make dividend payments, loans or other transfers of cash to their parent companies. Such restrictions, unless amended or waived or unless regulatory approval is granted, limit the use of any cash generated by these subsidiaries to pay our obligations. The maximum amount of dividends that can be paid by our insurance company subsidiaries without prior approval of the applicable state insurance departments is subject to restrictions relating to statutory surplus, statutory income and unassigned surplus.

61



CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
Pursuant to Item 303(a)(5) of Regulation S-K, we identified our known contractual obligations as of December 31, 2014 in our Form 10-K. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, there were no significant changes to our contractual obligations as previously disclosed in our Form 10-K.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As of June 30, 2015, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined under Regulation S-K Item 303(a)(4) and the instructions thereto. See Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our letters of credit.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
In our Form 10-K, we identified the critical accounting policies that affect the more significant estimates and assumptions used in preparing our consolidated financial statements. Those policies include revenue recognition, health care costs, including IBNR amounts, reserves for contingent liabilities, amounts receivable or payable under government contracts, goodwill and other intangible assets, recoverability of long-lived assets and investments, income taxes and accounting for certain provisions of the ACA. We have not changed existing policies from those previously disclosed in our Form 10-K. Our critical accounting policy on estimating reserves for claims and other settlements and the quantification of the sensitivity of financial results to reasonably possible changes in the underlying assumptions used in such estimation as of June 30, 2015 is discussed below. Our critical accounting policy on income taxes also is discussed below. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, there were no significant changes to the critical accounting estimates as disclosed in our Form 10-K.
Reserves for Claims and Other Settlements
Reserves for claims and other settlements include reserves for claims (IBNR claims and received but unprocessed claims), and other liabilities including capitation payable, shared risk settlements, provider disputes, provider incentives and other reserves for our Western Region Operations reporting segment. Because reserves for claims include various actuarially developed estimates, our actual health care services expenses may be more or less than our previously developed estimates.
We calculate our best estimate of the amount of our IBNR reserves in accordance with GAAP and using standard actuarial developmental methodologies. This method also is known as the chain-ladder or completion factor method. The developmental method estimates reserves for claims based upon the historical lag between the month when services are rendered and the month claims are paid while taking into consideration, among other things, expected medical cost inflation, seasonal patterns, product mix, benefit plan changes and changes in membership. A key component of the developmental method is the completion factor, which is a measure of how complete the claims paid to date are relative to the estimate of the claims for services rendered for a given period. While the completion factors are reliable and robust for older service periods, they are more volatile and less reliable for more recent periods since a large portion of health care claims are not submitted to us until several months after services have been rendered. Accordingly, for the most recent months, the incurred claims are estimated from a trend analysis based on per member per month claims trends developed from the experience in preceding months. This method is applied consistently year-over-year while assumptions may be adjusted to reflect changes in medical cost inflation, seasonal patterns, product mix, benefit plan changes and changes in membership, among other things.

62



An extensive degree of actuarial judgment is used in this estimation process, considerable variability is inherent in such estimates, and the estimates are highly sensitive to changes in medical claims submission and payment patterns and medical cost trends. As such, the completion factors and the claims per member per month trend factor are the most significant factors used in estimating our reserves for claims. Since a large portion of the reserves for claims is attributed to the most recent months, the estimated reserves for claims are highly sensitive to these factors. The following table illustrates the sensitivity of these factors and the estimated potential impact on our operating results caused by these factors:
 
Completion Factor (a)
Percentage-point
Increase (Decrease)
in Factor
 
Western Region Operations Health Plan Services
(Decrease) Increase in Reserves for Claims
2%
 
$ (68.5) million
1%
 
$ (35.0) million
(1)%
 
$ 36.7 million
(2)%
 
$ 75.1 million
 
Medical Cost Trend (b)
Percentage-point
Increase (Decrease)
in Factor
 
Western Region Operations Health Plan Services
Increase (Decrease) in Reserves for Claims
2%
 
$ 32.0 million
1%
 
$ 16.0 million
(1)%
 
$ (16.0) million
(2)%
 
$ (32.0) million
 
__________
(a)
Impact due to change in completion factor for the most recent three months. Completion factors indicate how complete claims paid to date are in relation to the estimate of total claims for a given period. Therefore, an increase in completion factor percent results in a decrease in the remaining estimated reserves for claims.
(b)
Impact due to change in annualized medical cost trend used to estimate the per member per month cost for the most recent three months.
Our IBNR best estimate also includes a provision for adverse deviation, which is an estimate for known environmental factors that are reasonably likely to affect the required level of IBNR reserves. This provision for adverse deviation is intended to capture the potential adverse development from known environmental factors such as our entry into new geographical markets, changes in our geographic or product mix, the introduction of new customer populations, variation in benefit utilization, disease outbreaks, changes in provider reimbursement, fluctuations in medical cost trend, variation in claim submission patterns and variation in claims processing speed and payment patterns, changes in technology that provide faster access to claims data or change the speed of adjudication and settlement of claims, variability in claim inventory levels, non-standard claim development, and/or exceptional situations that require judgmental adjustments in setting the reserves for claims.
We consistently apply our IBNR estimation methodology from period to period. Our IBNR best estimate is made on an accrual basis and adjusted in future periods as required. Any adjustments to the prior period estimates are included in the current period. As additional information becomes known to us, we adjust our assumptions accordingly to change our estimate of IBNR. Therefore, if moderately adverse conditions do not occur, evidenced by more complete claims information in the following period, then our prior period estimates will be revised downward, resulting in favorable development. However, any favorable prior period reserve development would increase current period net income only to the extent that the current period provision for adverse deviation is less than the benefit recognized from the prior period favorable development. If moderately adverse conditions occur and are more acute than we estimated, then our prior period estimates will be revised upward, resulting in unfavorable development, which would decrease current period net income.

63



For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we had $14.3 million and $99.7 million, respectively, in net favorable reserve developments related to prior years. The amount for the three months ended June 30, 2015 consisted of $2.4 million in favorable prior year development and a release of $11.9 million of the provision for adverse deviation held at December 31, 2014. The amount for the six months ended June 30, 2015 consisted of $23.0 million in favorable prior year development and a release of $76.7 million of the provision for adverse deviation held at December 31, 2014. We believe that the $23.0 million favorable development for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily due to the growth of the new Medicaid expansion population in 2014. As part of our best estimate for IBNR, the provision for adverse deviation recorded as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $79.4 million and $77.7 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the reserve development related to prior years, when considered together with the provision for adverse deviation recorded as of June 30, 2015, did not have a material impact on our operating results or financial condition.
Income Taxes
We record deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated by applying enacted tax rates and laws to taxable years in which such differences are expected to reverse. We establish a valuation allowance in accordance with the provisions of the Income Taxes Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") codification. We continually review the adequacy of the valuation allowance and recognize the benefits from our deferred tax assets only when an analysis of both positive and negative factors indicate that it is more likely than not that the benefits will be realized.
We file tax returns in many tax jurisdictions. Often, application of tax rules within the various jurisdictions is subject to differing interpretation. Despite our belief that our tax return positions are fully supportable, we believe that it is probable certain positions will be challenged by taxing authorities, and we may not prevail on all of the positions as filed. Accordingly, we maintain a liability for the estimated amount of contingent tax challenges by taxing authorities upon examination. We analyze the amount at which each tax position meets a “more likely than not” standard for sustainability upon examination by taxing authorities. Only tax benefit amounts meeting or exceeding this standard will be reflected in tax provision expense and deferred tax asset balances. Any difference between the amounts of tax benefits reported on tax returns and tax benefits reported in the financial statements is recorded as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The liability for unrecognized tax benefits is reported separately from deferred tax assets and liabilities and classified as current or noncurrent based upon the expected period of payment.
In 2015, due to the non-deductibility of the health insurer fee for federal income tax purposes, we expect our full-year effective income tax rate will exceed 50%. See "Overview—Health Care Reform Legislation and Implementation" and "—Results of Operations—Income Tax Provision" above.
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We are exposed to interest rate and market risk primarily due to our investing and borrowing activities. Market risk generally represents the risk of loss that may result from the potential change in the value of a financial instrument as a result of fluctuations in interest rates and/or market conditions and in equity prices. Interest rate risk is a consequence of maintaining variable interest rate earning investments and fixed rate liabilities or fixed income investments and variable rate liabilities. We are exposed to interest rate risks arising from changes in the level or volatility of interest rates, prepayment speeds and/or the shape and slope of the yield curve. In addition, we are exposed to the risk of loss related to changes in credit spreads. Credit spread risk arises from the potential changes in an issuer’s credit rating or credit perception that may affect the value of financial instruments. We believe that no material changes to any of these risks have occurred since December 31, 2014.
For a more detailed discussion of our market risks relating to these activities, refer to Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required

64



disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon the evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of the end of such period.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended June 30, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

65



PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item  1.
Legal Proceedings.
A description of the legal proceedings to which the Company and its subsidiaries are a party is contained in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors.
In addition to the Risk Factors and other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (our "Form 10-K"), which could materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or future results. The risks described in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our Form 10-K are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may materially adversely affect our business, cash flows, financial condition and/or results of operations.
The risk factors set forth below relate to our proposed merger (the "Merger") with Centene Corporation ("Centene"), and should be read together with the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Form 10-K.
The Merger is subject to conditions, some or all of which may not be satisfied, or completed on a timely basis, if at all. Failure to complete the Merger could have material adverse effects on the Company.
The completion of the Merger is subject to a number of conditions, including, among others, the approval by the Centene stockholders of the issuance of the shares of its common stock forming part of the merger consideration and the approval by our stockholders of the adoption of the Merger Agreement, which make the completion and timing of the completion of the Merger uncertain. Also, either we or Centene may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger has not been consummated by July 2, 2016, except that this right to terminate the Merger Agreement will not be available to any party whose failure to perform any obligation under the Merger Agreement has been the cause of or the primary factor that resulted in the failure of the Merger to be consummated on or before that date.
If the Merger is not completed on a timely basis, or at all, our ongoing business may be materially adversely affected and, without realizing any of the benefits of having completed the Merger, we will be subject to a number of risks, including the following:
the market price of our common stock could decline;
we could owe substantial termination fees to Centene under certain circumstances;
if the Merger Agreement is terminated and our Board of Directors (“Board”) seeks another business combination, our stockholders cannot be certain that we will be able to find a party willing to enter into a transaction on terms equivalent to or more attractive than the terms that Centene has agreed to in the Merger Agreement;
time and resources committed by our management to matters relating to the Merger could otherwise have been devoted to pursuing other beneficial opportunities for the Company; and
we will be required to pay our costs relating to the Merger, such as legal, accounting, financial advisory and printing fees, whether or not the Merger is completed.
In addition, we could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the Merger or related to any enforcement proceeding commenced against us to perform our obligations under the Merger Agreement. Either of these developments could adversely impact our ongoing business.
The Merger is subject to the expiration or termination of applicable waiting periods and the receipt of approvals, consents or clearances from regulatory authorities that may impose conditions that could have an adverse effect on the Company or, if not obtained, could prevent completion of the Merger.
Before the Merger may be completed, any waiting period (or extension thereof) applicable to the Merger must have expired or been terminated, and any approvals, consents or clearances required in connection with the Merger must have been obtained, in each case, under the Hart Scott Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended and other applicable law. In deciding whether to grant the required regulatory approval, consent or clearance, the relevant governmental entities may, among other things, consider the effect of the Merger on competition within their

66



relevant jurisdiction. The terms and conditions of the approvals, consents and clearances that are granted may impose requirements, limitations or costs or place restrictions on the conduct of the combined company’s business following the Merger. Under the Merger Agreement, we have agreed to use our reasonable best efforts to obtain such approvals, consents and clearances and therefore may be required to comply with conditions or limitations imposed by governmental authorities, except that we are not required to agree to any term, limitation, condition, restriction or requirement that, individually or in the aggregate, would have or would reasonably be expected to have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition, business, revenue or EBITDA as currently conducted, or a requirement that would or would reasonably be expected to restrict or prohibit any lines or types of business in which we shall be permitted to engage and would have or would reasonably be expected to have a material and adverse effect on the Company.
In addition, regulators may impose conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions in connection with their approval of or consent to the Merger, and such conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions may delay completion of the Merger or impose additional material costs on or materially limit the revenues of the combined company following the completion of the Merger.
The Merger Agreement contains provisions that limit our ability to pursue alternatives to the Merger, could discourage a potential competing acquiror of the Company from making a favorable alternative transaction proposal and, in specified circumstances, could require us to pay substantial termination fees to Centene.
The Merger Agreement contains certain provisions that restrict our ability to initiate, solicit, knowingly encourage or, subject to certain exceptions, engage in discussions or negotiations with respect to, or approve or recommend, any third-party proposal for an alternative transaction. Further, even if our Board withdraws or qualifies its recommendation with respect to the adoption of the Merger Agreement, unless the Merger Agreement has been terminated in accordance with its terms, we will still be required to submit our merger-related proposals to a vote at a special meeting of our stockholders. In addition, Centene generally has an opportunity to offer to modify the terms of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement in response to any third-party alternative transaction proposal made to our Board before our Board may withdraw or qualify its recommendation with respect to the merger-related proposals.
In some circumstances, upon termination of the Merger Agreement, we may be required to pay a termination fee of between $63 million and $251 million to Centene.
These provisions could discourage a potential third-party acquiror or merger partner that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant portion of the Company or pursuing an alternative transaction from considering or proposing such a transaction, even if it were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share cash or market value than the per share cash or market value proposed to be received or realized in the Merger. In particular, a termination fee, if applicable, may be substantial, and could result in a potential third-party acquiror or merger partner proposing to pay a lower price to our stockholders than it might otherwise have proposed to pay absent such a fee.
If the Merger Agreement is terminated and we determine to seek another business combination, we may not be able to negotiate a transaction with another party on terms comparable to, or better than, the terms of the Merger.

We are subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the proposed Merger is pending, which could adversely affect our business and operations.
In connection with the pendency of the Merger, it is possible that some customers, suppliers and other persons with whom we have a business relationship may delay or defer certain business decisions or might decide to seek to terminate, change or renegotiate their relationships with us as a result of the Merger, which could negatively affect our revenues, earnings and cash flows, as well as the market price of our common stock, regardless of whether the Merger is completed.
In addition, due to the deferral of the Cognizant Transaction, we have been making ongoing efforts to negotiate alternative arrangements for the consulting, technology and administrative services that were to be provided under the Master Services Agreement. If we are unable to successfully negotiate such alternative arrangements in a timely or cost effective manner, if we experience a loss or disruption in the provision of any of these functions or services, or if these functions or services are not performed in a timely, satisfactory or compliant manner we may be subject to regulatory enforcement actions; we may, among other things, incur unexpected costs; become vulnerable to security breaches that threaten the security and confidentiality of our information and data; or be unable to meet the full demands of our

67



customers or be subject to claims against us by our members. Any of the foregoing could have an adverse impact on our business.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we are subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of our business prior to completing the Merger, which may adversely affect our ability to execute certain of our business strategies, including the ability in certain cases to enter into or amend contracts, acquire or dispose of assets, incur indebtedness or incur capital expenditures. Such limitations could negatively affect our business and operations prior to the completion of the Merger.
Each of the risks described above may be exacerbated by delays or other adverse developments with respect to the completion of the Merger.
Uncertainties associated with the Merger may cause a loss of management personnel and other key employees which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We are dependent on the experience and industry knowledge of our officers and other key employees to execute our business plan. Prior to completion of the Merger, current and prospective employees of the Company may experience uncertainty about their roles within the combined company following the completion of the Merger, which may have an adverse effect on our ability to attract or retain key management and other key personnel and in turn could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Litigation filed against the Company, Centene, Merger Sub I, Merger Sub II or the respective officers or boards of directors of the Company or Centene could result in substantial costs to us, prevent or delay the consummation of the Merger or result in the payment of damages following completion of the Merger.
In connection with the Merger, purported Company stockholders have filed a putative stockholder class action lawsuit against Centene, Merger Sub I, Merger Sub II and certain members of the board of directors of the Company. Among other remedies, the plaintiffs seek to enjoin the Merger. The outcome of this litigation is uncertain. If a dismissal is not granted or a settlement is not reached, the lawsuit could prevent or delay completion of the Merger and result in substantial costs to us, including any costs associated with indemnification. Additional lawsuits may be filed against Centene, the Company, Merger Sub I, Merger Sub II or the directors and officers of either company in connection with the Merger. The defense or settlement of any lawsuit or claim that remains unresolved at the time the Merger is consummated may adversely affect the combined company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Item  2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
(c) Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
On May 2, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which a total of $300.0 million of our outstanding common stock could be repurchased (our "stock repurchase program"). On March 8, 2012, our Board of Directors approved a $323.7 million increase to our stock repurchase program and on December 16, 2014, our Board of Directors approved another $257.8 million increase to our stock repurchase program. As of June 30, 2015, the remaining authorization under our stock repurchase program was $306.2 million.
Under the Company’s various stock option and long-term incentive plans, in certain circumstances, employees and non-employee directors may elect for the Company to withhold shares to satisfy minimum statutory federal, state and local tax withholding and/or exercise price obligations, as applicable, arising from the exercise of stock options. For certain other equity awards, the Company has the right to withhold shares to satisfy any tax obligations for employees that may be required to be withheld or paid in connection with such equity awards, including any tax obligation arising on the vesting date.
A description of our stock repurchase program and the information required under this Item 2 is contained in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in Part I— “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Structure—Stock Repurchases.”
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.

68



Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5.
Other Information.
None.

69



Item 6.
Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:
Exhibit Number
Description 
 
 
10.1+
Employment Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2015, by and between Health Net, Inc. and Andrew R. Ortiz, a copy of which is filed herewith.
10.2+

Form of Performance Share Award Agreement utilized for eligible employees of Health Net, Inc. under the Amended and Restated 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, a copy of which is filed herewith.
10.3+

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement utilized for non-employee directors of Health Net, Inc. under the Amended and Restated 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, a copy of which is filed herewith.
10.4+
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement utilized for eligible employees of Health Net, Inc. under the Amended and Restated 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, a copy of which is filed herewith.
10.5
Certain Compensation and Benefit Arrangements with Health Net, Inc.’s Non-Employee Directors, effective as of May 7, 2015, a copy of which is filed herewith.
10.6ˆ
Addendum to the Master Staff Augmentation and Application Development Services Agreement dated May 3, 2006, the Master Services Agreement dated September 30, 2008 and the Master Services Agreement dated January 23, 2009, made July 1, 2015 by and between Cognizant Technology U.S. Corporation and Health Net, Inc., a copy of which is filed herewith.
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a copy of which is filed herewith.
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a copy of which is filed herewith.
32
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a copy of which is furnished herewith.
101
The following materials from Health Net, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (1) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, (2) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, (3) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, (4) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, (5) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 and (6) Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

__________
+
Management contract or compensatory plan.
ˆ
Portions of this exhibit have been redacted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that has been submitted separately to the Securities and Exchange Commission.


70



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 
 
 
 
HEALTH NET, INC.
(REGISTRANT)
Date:
August 4, 2015
By:
/s/    JAMES E. WOYS
 
 
 
James E. Woys
 
 
 
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Operating Officer and Interim Treasurer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
 
 
Date:
August 4, 2015
By:
/s/    MARIE MONTGOMERY
 
 
 
Marie Montgomery
 
 
 
Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
 
 
 
 



71



EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit Number
Description 
 
 
10.1+
Employment Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2015, by and between Health Net, Inc. and Andrew R. Ortiz, a copy of which is filed herewith.
10.2+
Form of Performance Share Award Agreement utilized for eligible employees of Health Net, Inc. under the Amended and Restated 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, a copy of which is filed herewith.
10.3+
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement utilized for non-employee directors of Health Net, Inc. under the Amended and Restated 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, a copy of which is filed herewith.
10.4+
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement utilized for eligible employees of Health Net, Inc. under the Amended and Restated 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, a copy of which is filed herewith.
10.5
Certain Compensation and Benefit Arrangements with Health Net, Inc.’s Non-Employee Directors, effective as of May 7, 2015, a copy of which is filed herewith.
10.6ˆ
Addendum to the Master Staff Augmentation and Application Development Services Agreement dated May 3, 2006, the Master Services Agreement dated September 30, 2008 and the Master Services Agreement dated January 23, 2009, made July 1, 2015 by and between Cognizant Technology U.S. Corporation and Health Net, Inc., a copy of which is filed herewith.
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a copy of which is filed herewith.
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a copy of which is filed herewith.
32
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a copy of which is furnished herewith.
101
The following materials from Health Net, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (1) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, (2) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, (3) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, (4) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, (5) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 and (6) Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

__________
+
Management contract or compensatory plan.
ˆ
Portions of this exhibit have been redacted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that has been submitted separately to the Securities and Exchange Commission.