Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - SAPIENT CORPFinancial_Report.xls
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - SAPIENT CORPexhibit321q314.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - SAPIENT CORPexhibit322q314.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - SAPIENT CORPexhibit312q314.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - SAPIENT CORPexhibit311q314.htm

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 
 FORM 10-Q
 
 
 
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014
OR 
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number: 0-28074
   
 
Sapient Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  
 
 
Delaware
 
04-3130648
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
131 Dartmouth St, Boston, MA
 
02116
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
617-621-0200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Not applicable)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): 
Large accelerated filer
 
x
Accelerated filer
 
o
Non-accelerated filer
 
o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
 
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  o    No  x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. 
Class
 
Outstanding at November 3, 2014
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
 
140,740,938
 



SAPIENT CORPORATION
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2014
 
 
Page
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
 
 
 
Item 1.
Item 1A.  
Item 2.
Item 6.

2


SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including those related to the proposed acquisition by Publicis Groupe S.A., the timing for closing the proposed acquisition, the conditions to closing the proposed acquisition, benefits of the proposed acquisition, our cash and liquidity resources, our expected cash outlays, our capital expenditures relating to restructuring and the effects of restructuring certain subsidiaries, future dividend payments, our peoplecount, investing activities, and repurchases of our common stock, the nature of our unbilled revenues, our tax estimates and deferred tax assets and amounts, including previously recorded employment-related tax liabilities, the timing of settlement of employment-related tax liabilities, the outcome of tax audits and proceedings, our accrual of contingent liabilities, the impact of acquisitions and acquisition costs and our fair value estimates, our compensation expense, the ability of our insurance to cover our indemnification arrangements and our fair value estimates of such arrangements, the effects of changes in interest rates and currency exchange rate fluctuations, the impact of new accounting pronouncements and changes to accounting policies, the temporary nature of certain impairments, our assumptions underlying certain impairment reviews, anticipated revenue from our services, including traditional IT consulting services, anticipated client contractual demands, our ability to meet working capital and capital expenditure requirements, the outcome of litigation, benefits of our relationships and strategic alliances, determinations around goodwill, the alignment of our sales professionals, our employee relationships, our competition and our principal competitive factors, our ability to estimate required resources for client arrangements, our technology platforms, borrowings under our credit facility, the nature of our unbilled revenues, our reinvestment of unremitted earnings and our plans regarding whether or not to repatriate overseas funds, our expectations regarding fixed price contracts and lease extensions, opportunities to earn performance bonuses in customer contracts, the anticipated impact of cross-border mobility and the movement of employees globally, and the cost impact and timing of our internal controls remediation, as well as any statement other than statements of historical facts are forward-looking statements. When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the words “will,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. We cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements, and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including the risks described in Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors, and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or strategic investments, including our acquisition by Publicis Groupe S.A. In addition, any forward-looking statements represent our expectation only as of the day this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was first filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and should not be relied on as representing our expectations as of any subsequent date. While we may elect to update forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even if our expectations change, except as required by law.


3


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements
SAPIENT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
 
September 30,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
ASSETS
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
308,887

 
$
337,630

Marketable securities
6,255

 
5,870

Restricted cash, current portion
41

 
69

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013
206,714


184,174

Unbilled revenues
110,960


85,436

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
82,438


54,516

Total current assets
715,295

 
667,695

Restricted cash, net of current portion
1,547


2,019

Property and equipment, net
97,073

 
85,898

Purchased intangible assets, net
26,301


27,508

Goodwill
149,303


149,142

Other assets
16,990


18,386

Total assets
$
1,006,509

 
$
950,648

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
30,226


$
30,410

Accrued expenses
78,177


65,348

Accrued compensation
134,755


99,004

Income taxes payable
14,990


18,439

Deferred revenues
23,133


29,866

Total current liabilities
281,281

 
243,067

Other long-term liabilities
83,734


117,568

Total liabilities
365,015

 
360,635

Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)

 

Noncontrolling interest subject to put provisions (Note 9)
727

 
784

Stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized and none issued or outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013

 

Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 146,431,623 and 144,484,051 shares issued, and 141,243,240 and 140,368,351 shares outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively
1,464

 
1,445

Additional paid-in capital
601,116

 
586,673

Treasury stock, at cost, 5,188,383 and 4,125,700 shares at September 30, 2014 and at December 31, 2013, respectively
(59,901
)
 
(43,756
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(42,508
)
 
(36,551
)
Retained earnings
140,596

 
81,418

Total Sapient Corporation stockholders’ equity
640,767

 
589,229

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
1,006,509

 
$
950,648


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements.

4


SAPIENT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited) 

Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
As Restated
 

 
As Restated
Revenues:
 
 
 
 

 

Service revenues
$
350,704


$
323,793


$
1,054,432


$
930,765

Reimbursable expenses
13,928

 
11,087

 
42,139

 
33,705

Total gross revenues
364,632

 
334,880

 
1,096,571

 
964,470

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 

 

Project personnel expenses
236,862

 
219,654

 
727,817


639,289

Reimbursable expenses
13,928

 
11,087

 
42,139

 
33,705

Total project personnel expenses and reimbursable expenses
250,790

 
230,741

 
769,956

 
672,994

Selling and marketing expenses
13,556

 
11,926

 
44,313


36,629

General and administrative expenses
60,654

 
52,313

 
178,159


160,188

Restructuring and other related charges (benefits)
1,125

 
(28
)
 
2,989

 
1,955

Amortization of purchased intangible assets
3,389

 
3,007

 
10,430


9,927

Acquisition costs and other related charges (benefits)
1,301

 
(1,268
)
 
1,729


(1,652
)
Impairment of intangible asset

 
596

 

 
2,090

Total operating expenses
330,815

 
297,287

 
1,007,576

 
882,131

Income from operations
33,817


37,593


88,995


82,339

Interest income
2,212

 
1,493

 
6,221

 
4,570

Interest expense
(924
)
 
(636
)
 
(2,412
)
 
(1,997
)
Other income, net
28

 
484

 
499

 
840

Income before income taxes
35,133

 
38,934

 
93,303

 
85,752

Provision for income taxes
12,796

 
12,677

 
34,132

 
30,874

Net income
22,337

 
26,257

 
59,171

 
54,878

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
70

 
(88
)
 
(7
)
 
(175
)
Net income attributable to stockholders of Sapient Corporation
$
22,267


$
26,345

 
$
59,178

 
$
55,053

Basic net income per share attributable to stockholders of Sapient Corporation
$
0.16

 
$
0.19

 
$
0.42

 
$
0.40

Diluted net income per share attributable to stockholders of Sapient Corporation
$
0.16

 
$
0.19

 
$
0.41

 
$
0.39

Weighted average common shares
141,624

 
139,959

 
141,299

 
139,202

Weighted average dilutive common share equivalents
1,473

 
2,302

 
2,259

 
3,731

Weighted average common shares and dilutive common share equivalents
143,097

 
142,261

 
143,558

 
142,933


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements.


5


SAPIENT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
 
Three Months Ended  
 September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
As Restated
Net income
$
22,337

 
$
26,257

 
$
59,171

 
$
54,878

Other comprehensive (loss) income:
 
 
 
 
 
 

Foreign currency translation adjustments
(13,036
)
 
2,614

 
(6,002
)
 
(14,449
)
Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale investments, net of taxes
5

 
(55
)
 
46

 
1

Reclassification adjustment for realized loss on available-for-sale investments, net of taxes

 

 

 
28

Net gain on available-for-sale investments
5

 
(55
)
 
46

 
29

Other comprehensive (loss) income
(13,031
)
 
2,559

 
(5,956
)
 
(14,420
)
Total comprehensive income
9,306

 
28,816

 
53,215

 
40,458

Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
(21
)
 
(92
)
 
(57
)
 
(282
)
Comprehensive income attributable to stockholders of Sapient Corporation
$
9,327

 
$
28,908

 
$
53,272

 
$
40,740


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements.


6


SAPIENT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 

 
As Restated
Cash flows from operating activities:

 

Net income
$
59,171

 
$
54,878

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

Deferred income taxes
(6,594
)
 
(2,250
)
Unrealized (gain) loss on financial instruments
(238
)
 
88

(Gain) loss recognized on disposition of fixed assets
(29
)
 
1,043

Realized gain on investments
(301
)
 

Depreciation expense
23,118

 
20,251

Amortization of purchased intangible assets
10,430

 
9,927

Loss recognized on sale of available-for-sale marketable securities

 
28

Impairment of intangible asset

 
2,090

Stock-based compensation expense
24,438

 
23,142

Excess tax benefits from exercise and release of stock-based awards
(4,030
)
 
(2,024
)
Non-cash restructuring charges

 
146

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding impact of acquisitions:

 

Accounts receivable
(20,379
)
 
(6,659
)
Unbilled revenues
(27,063
)
 
(32,984
)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
(28,125
)
 
5,773

Other assets
11,200

 
(144
)
Accounts payable
(793
)
 
907

Accrued compensation
19,949

 
(2,539
)
Deferred revenues
(6,718
)
 
(4,979
)
Accrued expenses
17,307

 
(4,903
)
Income taxes payable
(100
)
 
12,386

Other long-term liabilities
(32,962
)
 
1,275

Net cash provided by operating activities
38,281

 
75,452

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

Purchases of property and equipment and cost of internally developed software
(34,385
)
 
(27,201
)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
102

 

Cash paid for acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired
(13,016
)
 
(4,993
)
Cash paid for asset acquisitions
(1,500
)
 

Sales of marketable securities classified as available-for-sale

 
1,372

Purchases of marketable securities classified as available-for-sale

 
(1,916
)
Cash paid for acquisition of cost method investment
(5,526
)
 
(200
)
Cash received on settlement of financial instruments, net
154

 
(1,624
)
Change in restricted cash balances
373

 
3,941

Net cash used in investing activities
(53,798
)
 
(30,621
)
Cash flows from financing activities:

 

Excess tax benefits from exercise and release of stock-based awards
4,030

 
2,024

Proceeds from issuance of common stock under stock plans
2,375

 
2,703

Payment of acquisition date fair value contingent consideration
(5,136
)
 

Repurchases of common stock
(15,481
)
 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(14,212
)
 
4,727

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
986

 
(10,840
)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(28,743
)
 
38,718

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
337,630

 
234,038

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
308,887

 
$
272,756

Supplemental cash flow information:

 

Non-cash investing transactions:

 

Purchases of property and equipment for which cash had not been paid as of period end
$
2,665

 
$
2,254

Settlement of acquisition-related contingent consideration through releases from escrow
$

 
$
5,520

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements.

7


SAPIENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED AND CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated and condensed financial statements have been prepared by Sapient Corporation (the “Company”) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") regarding interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2013 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. These financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting solely of normal, recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period or the entire fiscal year.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The results of operations of acquired companies have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of the respective acquisition dates, as described further in Note 3, Business Acquisitions.
Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “Sapient,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to Sapient Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Restatement of Prior Period Financial Statements
As disclosed previously in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company restated its audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and its unaudited quarterly financial information for each of the quarters in the year ended December 31, 2012 and for the first three quarters in the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company has reflected herein its restated unaudited quarterly consolidated and condensed financial information as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
For further information regarding the Company's restatement, see Note 17, Restatement.
(2) Subsequent Events
On November 1, 2014, Sapient entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Publicis Groupe S.A., a French société anonyme (“Publicis Groupe ”), and 1926 Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Publicis Groupe (“Merger Sub”). Under the Merger Agreement, Publicis Groupe will cause Merger Sub to commence a cash tender offer (the “Offer”) within 10 business days following the date of the Merger Agreement, for all of Sapient’s outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Shares”), at a purchase price of $25.00 per Share, net to the seller in cash, without interest, subject to any required withholding of taxes.  The Offer will remain open for a minimum of 20 business days from the date of commencement. The transaction was unanimously approved by the Board of Directors of Sapient and the Management and Supervisory Boards of Publicis Groupe. The obligation of Merger Sub to purchase the Shares in the Offer is subject to certain closing conditions, including the Shares having been validly tendered and not withdrawn representing at least a majority of the total number of Shares then-outstanding, expiration or termination of applicable waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the antitrust, competition and trade regulation laws of Germany, the conclusion or termination of review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States and certain other regulatory approvals. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2015, although there can be no assurance the transaction will close within the expected timeframe or at all. If the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, Sapient may be obligated to pay Publicis Groupe a termination fee of $125.0 million.
For further information regarding the transaction and the Merger Agreement, please refer to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2014, with which the Merger Agreement is filed as Exhibit 2.1.
(3) Business Acquisitions
2014 Acquisition
OnPoint Consulting, Inc. ("OnPoint")
On February 5, 2014, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding equity of OnPoint Consulting, Inc. (“OnPoint”), a technology consulting firm based in Arlington, Virginia, which provides enterprise systems and infrastructure services to federal

8


government customers. The Company acquired OnPoint to expand its portfolio of government clients and contracts for application development cyber-security services and IT infrastructure services.
The acquisition date fair value, net of cash acquired, was $12.8 million for the purchase of 100% of OnPoint’s common stock. This total consisted of $12.5 million in cash paid upon closing (net of cash acquired). Of the cash amount paid, $0.8 million was placed into escrow, of which $0.3 million serves as security for any claims made by the Company under the terms of the escrow agreement between the Company and the former owners of OnPoint. The remaining amounts deposited into escrow were related to net working capital adjustments and were released from escrow during the three months ended June 30, 2014. Also, during the three months ended June 30, 2014, an additional $0.3 million was distributed to the former owners related to net working capital adjustments.
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The fair values of identifiable intangible assets were based on valuations using the income approach and estimates provided by management. The excess of the purchase price over the tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and assumed liabilities was recorded as goodwill. The fair values of goodwill, intangible assets and net assets acquired were approximately $1.7 million, $7.8 million, and $3.3 million, respectively.
The Company believes the amount of goodwill is attributable to the workforce of the acquired business (which is not eligible for separate recognition as an identifiable intangible asset). All of the goodwill was allocated to the Company’s Sapient Government Services reportable segment. The following table presents the estimated fair values and useful lives of intangible assets acquired:
 
Amount
 
Weighted Average Useful
Life
 
(in thousands)
 
(in years)
Backlog
$
5,290

 
7
Customer relationships
2,260

 
7
Tradename
230

 
2
Identifiable intangible assets
$
7,780

 
 
The useful lives of these intangible assets were based upon the patterns in which the economic benefits related to such assets are expected to be realized, and the intangible assets will be amortized on a basis reflecting those economic patterns. OnPoint's acquired goodwill and intangible assets will be deductible for tax purposes.
Service revenues for OnPoint during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 were $8.0 million and $18.3 million, respectively. Net income and net loss for OnPoint during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 were $0.9 million and $2.1 million, respectively. Proforma results of operations have not been included as the acquisition of OnPoint was not material to the Company's operations for any periods presented.
Prior Year Acquisitions
"la comunidad" CORPORATION and La Comunidad S.A.
On December 30, 2013, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding equity of "la comunidad" CORPORATION and La Comunidad S.A. (together, "La Comunidad"), an independent multicultural creative agency based in Miami, Florida and Buenos Aires, Argentina. The Company acquired La Comunidad to leverage the growing importance of multicultural marketing in expanding Sapient's combination of brand and creative service offerings to its clients.
The acquisition date fair value, net of cash acquired, was $21.0 million for the purchase of 100% of La Comunidad’s common stock. This total consisted of $9.7 million in cash (net of cash acquired), stock-based awards with an estimated fair value of $2.0 million and contingent consideration with estimated fair value of $9.3 million. Of the stock-based awards, $1.5 million was not issued at the time of acquisition (determined fair value of $1.0 million), of which $1.0 million serves as security for any claims made by the Company, and $0.5 million was related to final working capital adjustments. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, $0.3 million was distributed to the former owners related to net working capital adjustments.
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The fair values of identifiable intangible assets were based on valuations using the income approach and estimates provided by management. The excess of the purchase price over the tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and assumed liabilities was recorded as goodwill. The preliminary fair values of goodwill, intangible assets and net assets were approximately $13.9 million, $6.1 million, and $1.1 million, respectively. These amounts are subject to subsequent adjustment as the Company obtains additional information during the measurement period and finalizes its fair value estimates primarily with respect to certain components of working capital.

9


The Company believes the amount of goodwill is attributable to the workforce of the acquired business (which is not eligible for separate recognition as an identifiable intangible asset) and the expected synergistic benefits of being able to leverage La Comunidad’s expertise with the Company’s existing services to provide integrated marketing services to the customer bases of both the Company and La Comunidad. All of the goodwill was allocated to the Company’s SapientNitro reportable segment.
The former owners of La Comunidad are also eligible to receive additional consideration of up to $24.0 million, which is contingent on the fulfillment of certain financial and other performance conditions during the years ending December 31, 2014 through December 31, 2017. If such conditions are achieved, the consideration is payable under certain circumstances in cash or a combination of cash and common stock, at the Company's discretion up to a defined threshold. Using a discounted cash flow method, the Company recorded an estimated liability of $9.3 million as of the acquisition date and $10.4 million as of September 30, 2014. The Company will continue to assess the probability that the conditions will be fulfilled, and any subsequent changes in the estimated fair value of the liability will be reflected in earnings until the liability is fully settled. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded an expense of $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, relating to the change in fair value of the contingent liability. This amount is included in "Acquisition costs and other related charges" in the Company's unaudited consolidated and condensed statements of operations.
iThink Comunicação e Publicidade Ltda.
On January 16, 2013, the Company acquired 81% of the outstanding securities of iThink Comunicação e Publicidade Ltda. (“iThink”), an independent digital agency based in São Paulo, Brazil. The Company acquired iThink to expand Sapient’s combination of brand, digital and commerce service offerings to global clients in Latin America.
The acquisition date fair value, net of cash acquired, was $6.8 million for the purchase of 81% of iThink’s outstanding securities, including the fair value amount of $1.2 million of noncontrolling interest. This total consisted of $4.9 million of cash paid (net of cash acquired and working capital adjustments), deferred contingent consideration with an estimated fair value of $0.7 million, and noncontrolling interest with an estimated fair value of $1.2 million. Of the cash amount paid, $2.0 million was placed into escrow, of which $1.5 million serves as security for any claims made by the Company under the terms of an escrow agreement between the Company and the former owners of iThink. The remaining amounts were related to other adjustments, including net working capital adjustments, and were released from escrow during the three months ended June 30, 2013.
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The fair values of identifiable intangible assets were based on valuations using the income approach and estimates provided by management. The excess of the purchase price over the tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and net assets was recorded as goodwill. The fair values of goodwill, intangible assets and net assets were $6.3 million, $1.4 million, and $(0.4) million, respectively.
The Company believes the amount of goodwill is attributable to the workforce of the acquired business (which is not eligible for separate recognition as an identifiable intangible asset) and the expected synergistic benefits of being able to leverage iThink’s expertise with the Company’s existing services to provide integrated marketing services to the customer bases of both the Company and iThink in Latin America. All of the goodwill was allocated to the Company’s SapientNitro reportable segment.
The former owners of iThink are eligible to receive additional cash consideration of up to $11.7 million, which is contingent on the fulfillment of certain financial conditions during the three years ending December 31, 2015. Using a discounted cash flow method, the Company recorded an estimated contingent consideration liability of $0.7 million as of the acquisition date, and zero as of September 30, 2014. The Company will continue to assess the probability that the conditions will be fulfilled and any subsequent changes in the estimated fair value of the liability will be reflected in earnings until the liability is fully settled. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded a benefit of less than $0.1 million, relating to the remeasurement of the fair value of the contingent liability. This amount is included in "Acquisition costs and other related charges" in the Company's unaudited consolidated and condensed statements of operations. The contingent consideration liability is denominated in a foreign currency and, therefore, its value as reported in U.S. dollars on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet may change from period to period due to currency exchange rate fluctuations. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, the Company executed an Employment Agreement with one of iThink's minority owners, pursuant to which the individual waived all rights to the contingent consideration.
The Company has the right (but not the obligation) to purchase the remaining noncontrolling interest in iThink at certain times and under certain circumstances (the “Call Option”) as defined by the terms of the purchase agreement. With respect to any of the remaining equity interests in iThink for which the Company does not exercise its purchase option, the owners of the noncontrolling interest in iThink have the right (but not the obligation) to sell their equity interests to the Company (the “Put Option”). The Call Option and Put Option may only be exercised for a period of 30 days following specific circumstances. The Call Option and Put Option are embedded features of the noncontrolling interest and are not freestanding financial instruments. Due to the presence of the Put Option, the noncontrolling interest in iThink is classified as temporary equity, between liabilities and permanent equity, in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The noncontrolling interest was initially recorded at fair value and is subsequently adjusted at each reporting period for comprehensive income (loss) of the subsidiary attributed to the noncontrolling interest, dividends paid to the noncontrolling interest, and changes in the controlling entity’s ownership interest.

10


During the three months ended December 31, 2013, the Company made additional capital contributions which increased the Company's ownership from 81% to 84% of the outstanding securities of iThink.
(m)Phasize, LLC
On December 27, 2012, the Company acquired 100% of the membership interests of (m)Phasize, LLC (“(m)Phasize”), a marketing analytics company located in Westport, Connecticut. The Company acquired (m)Phasize to strengthen its analytics services and marketing mix modeling capabilities.
The acquisition date fair value, net of cash acquired, was $18.5 million for the purchase of 100% of (m)Phasize’s membership interests. This total consisted of $12.1 million in cash, inclusive of net working capital adjustments, stock-based awards with an estimated fair value of $0.3 million, and deferred contingent consideration with an estimated fair value of $6.1 million. Of the cash amount, $2.5 million was placed into escrow; $1.2 million served as security for any claims made by the Company under the terms of an escrow agreement between the Company and the former owners of (m)Phasize and was released to the former owners of (m)Phasize during the three months ended June 30, 2014; $1.0 million was contingent upon meeting certain revenue targets and was released to the former owners of (m)Phasize during the three months ended March 31, 2013; and $0.3 million related to final working capital adjustments and was released to the former owners of (m)Phasize in July 2013.
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The fair values of identifiable intangible assets were based on valuations using the income approach and estimates provided by management. The excess of the purchase price over the tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and assumed liabilities was recorded as goodwill. The fair values of goodwill, intangible assets and net assets were $11.8 million, $5.9 million, and $0.8 million, respectively.
The former members of (m)Phasize are also eligible to receive additional consideration of up to $12.8 million, which is contingent on the fulfillment of certain financial conditions during the year ended December 31, 2013 and the year ending December 31, 2014. If such conditions are achieved, the consideration is payable under certain circumstances in cash or a combination of cash and common stock, at the Company's discretion up to a defined threshold. Using a discounted cash flow method, the Company recorded an estimated liability of $6.1 million as of the acquisition date. As of December 31, 2013, one of the financial conditions was achieved and as a result, $5.5 million was paid to the former shareholders of (m)Phasize during the three months ended June 30, 2014. As of September 30, 2014, using a discounted cash flow method, the Company recorded an estimated liability of $4.3 million for the consideration related to the fulfillment of certain financial conditions during the year ended December 31, 2014. The Company will continue to assess the probability that the conditions will be fulfilled, and any subsequent changes in the estimated fair value of the liability will be reflected in earnings until the liability is fully settled. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded an expense of $0.4 million and $2.4 million, respectively, relating to the remeasurement of the fair value of the contingent liability. This amount is included in “Acquisition costs and other related charges” in the Company’s unaudited consolidated and condensed statements of operations.
Second Story Inc.
On November 1, 2012, the Company acquired Second Story Inc. (“Second Story”), an interactive studio operating in the United States. The Company acquired Second Story to strengthen the Company’s ability to craft physical and digital experiences from web and mobile to in-store and in-venue.
The acquisition date fair value, net of cash acquired, was $9.9 million for the purchase of 100% of Second Story’s outstanding shares. This total consisted of $6.0 million in cash, restricted stock with an estimated fair value of $2.1 million, and deferred stock consideration with an estimated fair value of $1.8 million. Of the cash amount, $0.9 million was placed into escrow; of which $0.5 million served as security for any claims made by the Company under the terms of an escrow agreement between the Company and the former owners of Second Story, and $0.4 million was related to final working capital adjustments. These escrow amounts were released to the former owners of Second Story during the three-months ended March 31, 2013. As of September 30, 2014, the fair value of the deferred stock consideration was $1.7 million.
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The fair values of identifiable intangible assets were based on valuations using the income approach and estimates provided by management. The excess of the purchase price over the tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and assumed liabilities was recorded as goodwill. The fair values of goodwill, intangible assets and net assets were $6.5 million, $2.4 million, and $1.0 million, respectively.
D&D Holdings Limited
On September 6, 2011, the Company acquired D&D Holdings Ltd. (“DAD”), a London-based advertising agency operating in the United Kingdom and continental Europe. The Company acquired DAD in order to strengthen its capabilities in marketing campaign production and direct response measurement.

11


The acquisition date fair value, net of cash acquired, was $45.2 million for the purchase of 100% of DAD’s outstanding shares. The $45.2 million consisted of $29.5 million in cash and deferred contingent consideration with an estimated fair value of $15.7 million. Of the cash amount, $9.8 million was placed into escrow to serve as security for any claims made by the Company under the terms of an escrow agreement between the Company and the former owners of DAD. The escrow amount may be utilized for the potential settlement of a portion of the deferred contingent consideration.
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The fair values of identifiable intangible assets were based on valuations using the income approach and estimates provided by management. The excess of the purchase price over the tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and assumed liabilities was recorded as goodwill. The fair values of goodwill, intangible assets and net assets were $24.0 million, $25.2 million, and $(4.0) million, respectively.
The former shareholders of DAD were also eligible to receive additional consideration of up to $21.9 million, which was contingent on the fulfillment of certain financial conditions within the period from July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2014. The consideration was payable under certain circumstances in cash, common stock or a combination of both, at the Company's discretion up to a defined threshold. Using a discounted cash flow method, the Company recorded an estimated liability of $15.7 million as of the acquisition date. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, one of the financial conditions was achieved and as a result, $4.7 million of the escrow was released to the former shareholders of DAD during the three months ended June 30, 2012. At December 31, 2012, another of the financial conditions was achieved and as a result, $4.8 million of the escrow was released to the former shareholders of DAD during the three months ending March 31, 2013. At June 30, 2014, the remaining financial conditions were partially achieved and as a result, $2.6 million was paid in cash to the former shareholders of DAD during the three months ended September 30, 2014 and $1.1 million remains as a liability as of September 30, 2014. The remaining $1.1 million liability was issued in shares subsequent to September 30, 2014. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded a benefit of less than $0.1 million and $3.2 million, respectively, relating to remeasurement of the fair value of the contingent liability, which are included in “Acquisition costs and other related charges” in the Company’s consolidated and condensed statements of operations. This liability is denominated in a foreign currency and therefore, its value as reported in U.S. dollars on the Company’s unaudited consolidated and condensed balance sheets may change from period to period due to currency exchange rate fluctuations.
(4) Marketable Securities and Fair Value Disclosures
Marketable Securities
As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, all of the Company’s marketable securities were classified as available-for-sale and their estimated fair values were $6.3 million and $5.9 million, respectively.
The following table presents details of the Company’s marketable securities as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands):
 
Available-for-Sale Securities as of September 30, 2014
 
Available-for-Sale Securities as of December 31, 2013
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Estimated
Fair Value
Short-term:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mutual funds
$
6,268

 
$
17

 
$
(30
)
 
$
6,255

 
$
5,934

 
$

 
$
(64
)
 
$
5,870

Total
$
6,268

 
$
17

 
$
(30
)
 
$
6,255

 
$
5,934

 
$

 
$
(64
)
 
$
5,870

There were no other-than-temporary impairment losses recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 or 2013. Any other-than-temporary impairment losses on marketable securities would be recorded in “Other income, net” in the Company’s unaudited consolidated and condensed statements of operations.
Fair Value Disclosures
ASC 820, Fair Value Measures and Disclosures, establishes a value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the third is considered unobservable:
Level 1 assets consist of money market fund deposits and mutual funds that are traded in active markets with sufficient volume and frequency of transactions. The fair values of these assets were determined from quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
Level 2 assets consist of bank time deposits, foreign exchange option contracts, and Level 2 liabilities consist of foreign exchange option contracts. The fair values of these assets and liabilities were determined from inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

12


Level 3 assets and liabilities include indemnification assets and contingent consideration liabilities, recorded as the result of acquisitions. The fair value of an acquired indemnification asset is affected most significantly by changes in the fair value of the subject of the indemnification and changes in the expected probabilities of collecting the asset amounts. The fair value of an acquisition-related contingent consideration liability is affected most significantly by changes in the estimated probabilities of the contingencies being achieved.
The Company records certain assets and liabilities at fair value. The following tables present the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands):
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2014 Using
 
Balance Sheet Classification
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bank time deposits
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$

 
$
93,236

 
$

 
$
93,236

Money market fund deposits
Cash and cash equivalents
 
2,801

 

 

 
2,801

Mutual funds
Marketable securities, current portion
 
6,255

 

 

 
6,255

Foreign exchange option contracts, net
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 

 
294

 

 
294

Indemnification assets associated with acquisitions, current
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 

 

 
383

 
383

Indemnification assets associated with acquisitions, noncurrent
Other assets
 

 

 
206

 
206

Total
 
 
$
9,056

 
$
93,530

 
$
589

 
$
103,175

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange option contracts
Accrued expenses
 
$

 
$
46

 
$

 
$
46

Contingent consideration liability associated with acquisitions, current
Accrued expenses
 

 

 
7,872

 
7,872

Contingent consideration liability associated with acquisitions, noncurrent
Other long-term liabilities
 

 

 
7,808

 
7,808

Total
 
 
$

 
$
46

 
$
15,680

 
$
15,726

 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013 Using
 
Balance Sheet Classification
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bank time deposits
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$

 
$
79,662

 
$

 
$
79,662

Money market fund deposits
Cash and cash equivalents
 
14,154

 

 

 
14,154

Mutual funds
Marketable securities, current portion
 
5,870

 

 

 
5,870

Foreign exchange option contracts, net
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 

 
129

 

 
129

Indemnification assets associated with acquisitions, current
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 

 

 
304

 
304

Indemnification assets associated with acquisitions, noncurrent
Other assets
 

 

 
597

 
597

Total
 
 
$
20,024

 
$
79,791

 
$
901

 
$
100,716

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange option contracts
Accrued expenses
 
$

 
$
175

 
$

 
$
175

Contingent consideration liability associated with acquisitions, current
Accrued expenses
 

 

 
11,237

 
11,237

Contingent consideration liability associated with acquisitions, noncurrent
Other long-term liabilities
 

 

 
12,426

 
12,426

Total
 
 
$

 
$
175

 
$
23,663

 
$
23,838

The Company did not have any transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value measurement hierarchy during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2014.

13


The following table presents a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
 
Level 3 Inputs
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
Balance at December 31, 2013
$
901

 
$
23,663

Payment of contingent consideration liability

 
(8,062
)
Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability, included in acquisition costs and other related benefits

 
(403
)
Change in fair value of acquired indemnification assets and contingent consideration liability, included in currency translation adjustments
(30
)
 
(24
)
Increase in fair value of contingent consideration liability, included in general and administrative expenses

 
506

Change in indemnification assets recorded in acquisitions
(282
)
 

Balance at September 30, 2014
$
589

 
$
15,680

The Company’s non-financial assets and liabilities, which include goodwill and long-lived assets held and used, are not required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. However, if certain triggering events occur, or if an annual impairment test is required, the Company would evaluate the non-financial assets and liabilities for impairment. If an impairment was to occur, the asset or liability would be recorded at its estimated fair value. During the three months ended September 30 and March 31, 2013, the Company recorded an impairment of its Nitro customer list intangible asset in the amount of $0.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively. No impairment was recorded in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014. See Note 12, Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets, for additional information.
(5) Stock-Based Compensation
Project personnel expenses, selling and marketing expenses and general and administrative expenses presented in the accompanying unaudited consolidated and condensed statements of operations include the following stock-based compensation expense amounts (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
As Restated
Project personnel expenses
$
5,136

 
$
5,044

 
$
14,993

 
$
14,521

Selling and marketing expenses
295

 
175

 
803

 
714

General and administrative expenses
2,913

 
2,933

 
8,642

 
7,907

Total stock-based compensation expense
$
8,344

 
$
8,152

 
$
24,438

 
$
23,142

Stock-based compensation costs capitalized relating to individuals working on internally developed software were immaterial during all periods presented. The Company values restricted stock units (“RSUs”) based on performance conditions and RSUs contingent on employment based on the fair market value on the date of grant, which is equal to the quoted closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.
For only those awards that are expected to vest, the Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award when the only condition to vesting is continued employment. If vesting is subject to a market or performance condition, vesting is based on the derived service period. The Company estimates its forfeiture rate based on its historical experience.
During the second quarter of 2011, the Company granted an aggregate of 294,000 RSUs with service and performance conditions to six members of its leadership team. Any units which become eligible for vesting as a result of fulfillment of the performance conditions will vest only if the recipient remains continuously employed with the Company through the award vesting period. On April 1, 2014, the recipients fulfilled the service conditions and received 81,323, 69,848 and 87,268 units for the performance conditions partially achieved during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

14


On April 1, 2014, the Company granted an aggregate of 280,591 RSUs with service and performance conditions to five members of its leadership team. Any units which become eligible for vesting as a result of fulfillment of the performance conditions will vest only if the recipient remains continuously employed with the Company through the award vest date of April 1, 2017.
The following table presents activity relating to stock options under all of the Company’s stock option plans during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (in thousands, except prices):
 
Shares
 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013
463

 
$
6.55

Options exercised
(380
)
 
$
6.35

Options forfeited/canceled
(10
)
 
$
6.14

Outstanding as of September 30, 2014
73

 
$
7.64

Outstanding, vested and exercisable as of September 30, 2014
73

 
$
7.64

Aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding, vested and exercisable
$
463

 
 
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $3.9 million and $5.5 million, respectively, determined at the exercise date. As of September 30, 2014, all stock options outstanding were vested and exercisable. As of September 30, 2014, there was no remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options.
The following table presents activity relating to RSUs during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (in thousands, except prices):
 
Number of Shares Underlying Restricted Units
 
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair
Value
Unvested as of December 31, 2013
6,828

 
$
6.97

Restricted units granted
2,331

 
$
17.18

Restricted units vested
(2,408
)
 
$
16.93

Restricted units forfeited/canceled
(391
)
 
$
12.96

Unvested as of September 30, 2014
6,360

 
$
6.58

Expected to vest as of September 30, 2014
5,873

 
$
6.58

The weighted-average grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $17.18 and $12.08 per RSU, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of RSUs vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $41.0 million and $28.1 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2014, the aggregate intrinsic value of non-vested RSUs, net of estimated forfeitures, was $89.1 million. As of September 30, 2014, unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested RSUs was $65.0 million, net of estimated forfeitures, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.4 years.


15


(6) Net Income Per Share
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted net income per share for the periods presented (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
As Restated
Net income attributable to stockholders of Sapient Corporation
$
22,267

 
$
26,345

 
$
59,178

 
$
55,053

Basic net income per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding
141,624

 
139,959

 
141,299

 
139,202

Basic net income per share attributable to stockholders of Sapient Corporation
$
0.16

 
$
0.19

 
$
0.42

 
$
0.40

Diluted net income per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding
141,624

 
139,959

 
141,299


139,202

Weighted average dilutive common share equivalents
1,473

 
2,302

 
2,259


3,731

Weighted average common shares and dilutive common share equivalents
143,097

 
142,261

 
143,558

 
142,933

Diluted net income per share attributable to stockholders of Sapient Corporation
$
0.16

 
$
0.19

 
$
0.41

 
$
0.39

Anti-dilutive options and share-based awards not included in the calculation
26

 
3

 
21

 
10

Weighted average dilutive common share equivalents include the dilutive impact of deferred stock consideration and restricted stock associated with the acquisitions of La Comunidad, (m)Phasize, Second Story, and DAD. The dilutive impact is included in the weighted average dilutive common share equivalents when contingencies are achieved.
(7) Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to certain legal proceedings and claims incidental to the operations of its business. The Company is also subject to certain other legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and that have not been fully adjudicated. The Company currently does not anticipate that these matters, if resolved against the Company, will have a material adverse impact on its financial results or financial condition.
The Company accrues loss contingencies when losses become probable and are reasonably estimable. If the reasonable estimate of the loss is a range and no amount within the range is a better estimate, the minimum amount of the range is recorded as a liability. As of September 30, 2014, the Company has recorded an accrual of $0.7 million for loss contingencies, which represents the better estimate within the probable range of $0.7 million and $2.4 million, related to all probable losses where a reasonable estimate could be made.
The Company does not accrue for contingent losses that, in the judgment of the Company, are considered to be reasonably possible, but not probable. As of September 30, 2014, the Company does not have any reasonably possible losses for which an estimate can be made. Although the Company intends to defend its legal matters vigorously, the ultimate outcome of these matters is uncertain. However, the Company does not expect the potential losses, if any, to have a material adverse impact on its operating results, cash flows, or financial condition.
(8) Income Taxes
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded income tax provisions of $12.8 million and $34.1 million, respectively, compared to $12.7 million and $30.9 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. Income tax is related to federal, state, and foreign tax obligations. The increase in tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily due to the jurisdictional mix of profit before tax. The increase in tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily related to the increase in profit before taxes and the jurisdictional mix.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company’s effective tax rate varied from the statutory tax rate primarily due to state income taxes, the tax rate differential attributable to income earned by the Company’s foreign subsidiaries and the related mix of jurisdictional profits, and changes in uncertain tax positions.
The Company enjoys the benefits of income tax holidays in certain jurisdictions in which it operates. In 2009, the Company established a new India unit in a Special Economic Zone (“SEZ”) which was entitled to a five year, 100% tax holiday, which ended on

16


March 31, 2014. Immediately following the expiration of the 100% tax holiday, the SEZ unit is entitled to a five year, 50% tax holiday, which ends on March 31, 2019.
Deferred tax assets are to be reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available positive and negative evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of September 30, 2014, a valuation allowance is maintained against the Company's U.S. deferred tax assets associated with certain capital loss and state tax net operating loss carryforwards. The Company continues to believe that the remainder of its U.S. deferred tax assets and the deferred tax assets of its foreign subsidiaries are more likely than not to be realized, and therefore, no valuation allowance has been recorded against these assets.
The Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, of $33.2 million as of September 30, 2014 and $30.8 million as of December 31, 2013. The amounts of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would result in a reduction of the Company’s effective tax rate were $32.1 million and $29.7 million as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, accrued interest and penalties were $5.2 million and $4.2 million, respectively.
The Company conducts business globally, and as a result, the Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal and state jurisdictions as well as various foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world, including such major jurisdictions as Canada, Germany, India, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Company is currently under tax audits and proceedings in Canada, India, the United Kingdom, and the United States for various periods between 2006 and 2013. The statute of limitations in the Company’s other tax jurisdictions remain open for various periods between 2006 and the present. However, carryforward attributes from prior closed years may still be adjusted upon examination by tax authorities if they are used in open periods.
Although the Company believes its tax estimates are appropriate, the final determination of tax audits and proceedings could result in favorable or unfavorable changes in its estimates. The Company anticipates the settlement of tax audits and proceedings, as well as the expiration of relevant statutes of limitations in the next twelve months could result in a decrease in its gross unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, of between $13.0 million and $17.0 million.
(9) Noncontrolling Interest Subject to Put Provisions
The Company has potential obligations to purchase the noncontrolling interests held by third parties in connection with its acquisition of iThink. See Note 3, Business Acquisitions. These obligations are in the form of put provisions that are exercisable at the third-party owners' discretion, within the specified period, as outlined in the iThink purchase and sale agreement. If these put provisions are exercised by the third parties within the specified period, the Company will be required to purchase all of the third-party owners' noncontrolling interests at a determined put price as outlined in the iThink purchase and sale agreement, which is based on a specified factor multiplied by the average quarterly EBITDA achieved in the 12 quarters subsequent to the acquisition date. The put provisions are not exercisable until after the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015.
The acquisition date fair value of the noncontrolling interest was derived by extrapolating the fair value of the noncontrolling interest ownership based on the consideration transferred for the controlling interest in connection with the acquisition of the majority interest of iThink, net of a discount factor, to take into account the noncontrolling interest’s lack of marketability.
During the three months ended December 31, 2013, the Company made additional capital contributions, which increased the Company's ownership from 81% to 84% of the outstanding securities of iThink.
As of September 30, 2014, the Company's potential obligations under these put options were approximately $0.7 million, of which none were exercisable.

17


The following table presents a roll forward of the noncontrolling interest subject to put provisions during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
 
Nine months ended September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
As Restated
Beginning Balance
$
784

 
$

Acquisitions during the period

 
1,205

Net loss
(7
)
 
(175
)
Other comprehensive loss
(50
)
 
(107
)
Ending Balance
$
727

 
$
923

(10) Segment Information
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available that is evaluated on a regular basis by the Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and in assessing performance. The Company's CODM is its Chief Executive Officer.
The Company identifies such segments based upon target client markets because each operating segment helps clients identify and act upon opportunities to improve their business performance, but strategically serves a different market. The Company considered qualitative factors, including the economic characteristics of each operating segment to determine if any qualified for aggregation. More specifically, the Company evaluated the economic characteristics, the nature of products and services, the methods used to provide services, the types of customers, and the nature of the corresponding regulatory environment of its operating segments. As a result, the Company identified the following reportable segments: SapientNitro, Sapient Global Markets, and Sapient Government Services.
The CODM evaluates performance based upon each segment's operating income, which is defined as income before allocations of certain marketing and general and administrative expenses. These charges are excluded from evaluation of performance because these activities and costs generally impact areas that support all of the segments and, therefore, are managed separately. Management does not allocate amortization of purchased intangible assets, acquisition costs and other related charges (benefits), stock-based compensation expense, impairment of intangible asset, restructuring and other related charges (benefits), or interest and other income to the segments for the review of results by the CODM. Asset information by segment is not reported to or reviewed by the CODM, and therefore, the Company has not disclosed asset information for the segments.
The following tables present the service revenues and income from operations attributable to the Company’s reportable segments for the periods presented (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended  
 September 30,

Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
2014

2013

2014

2013
 


As Restated



As Restated
Service Revenues:







SapientNitro
$
233,415


$
219,784


$
702,717


$
628,325

Sapient Global Markets
95,552


88,666


287,847


259,264

Sapient Government Services
21,737


15,343


63,868


43,176

Total service revenues
$
350,704

 
$
323,793

 
$
1,054,432


$
930,765

Income Before Income Taxes:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SapientNitro
$
80,937


$
73,668


$
231,480


$
199,265

Sapient Global Markets
27,088


27,900


82,871


79,463

Sapient Government Services
5,497


4,840


13,341


12,656

Total reportable segments operating income (1)
113,522

 
106,408

 
327,692

 
291,384

Less: reconciling items (2)
(78,389
)

(67,474
)

(234,389
)

(205,632
)
Total income before income taxes
$
35,133

 
$
38,934

 
$
93,303


$
85,752

 
(1)
Segment operating income does not represent the total operating results for each business unit, as it does not contain an allocation of certain corporate and general and administrative expenses incurred in support of the business unit segments. Segment operating income reflects

18


restructuring charges allocated to the SapientNitro and Sapient Global Markets reportable segments consisting of immaterial amounts for the three months ended September 30, 2013, and $1.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
(2)
Adjustments that are made to reconcile total reportable segments operating income to consolidated income before income taxes include the following (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2014

2013

2014

2013
 



As Restated




As Restated
Centrally managed functions
$
65,546


$
58,356


$
196,296


$
175,367

Stock-based compensation expense
8,344


8,152


24,438


23,142

Restructuring and other related charges (benefits)
1,125


(28
)

2,989


171

Amortization of purchased intangible assets
3,389


3,007


10,430


9,927

Acquisition costs and other related charges (benefits)
1,301


(1,268
)

1,729


(1,652
)
Impairment of intangible asset


596




2,090

Other (3)




2,815



Interest and other income, net
(1,316
)

(1,341
)

(4,308
)

(3,413
)
Total reconciling items
$
78,389

 
$
67,474

 
$
234,389


$
205,632

(3) In the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company incurred a $2.8 million one-time project personnel expense charge to reimburse employees for costs incurred as part of a restructuring of a global travel program. As this is unrelated to current operations, and neither comparable to prior periods nor predictive of future results, the Company has excluded it from the reportable segments operating income in evaluating management performance.
(11) Geographic Data
The following tables present data for the geographic regions in which the Company operates (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
As Restated
Service revenues (1):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
$
224,673

 
$
211,271

 
$
658,176

 
$
589,916

United Kingdom
66,276

 
33,870

 
184,730

 
86,316

Rest of International
59,755

 
78,652

 
211,526

 
254,533

Total service revenues
$
350,704

 
$
323,793

 
$
1,054,432


$
930,765

 
September 30,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
Long-lived tangible assets (2):
 
 
 
United States
$
41,641

 
$
34,198

India
37,435

 
35,094

United Kingdom
10,342

 
8,670

Rest of International
7,655

 
7,936

Total long-lived tangible assets (3)
$
97,073


$
85,898

(1)
Allocation of service revenues to individual countries is based on the location of the Sapient legal entity that contracts with the client.
(2)
Allocation of long-lived tangible assets to individual countries is based on the location of the Sapient legal entity that has title to the assets.
(3)
Reflects the net book value of the Company’s property and equipment.


19


(12) Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets
The following table presents the changes in goodwill allocated to the Company’s reportable segments during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
 
SapientNitro
 
Sapient Global
Markets
 
Sapient Government Services
 
Total
Goodwill as of December 31, 2013
$
118,642

 
$
30,500

 
$

 
$
149,142

Acquisitions during the period

 

 
1,708

 
1,708

Adjustments
(26
)
 

 

 
(26
)
Foreign currency exchange rate effect
(1,305
)
 
(216
)
 

 
(1,521
)
Goodwill as of September 30, 2014
$
117,311

 
$
30,284

 
$
1,708

 
$
149,303

The following table summarizes purchased intangible assets as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands): 
 
September 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Book
Value
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Book
Value
Customer lists and customer relationships
$
47,179

 
$
(29,449
)
 
$
17,730

 
$
45,569

 
$
(24,520
)
 
$
21,049

Non-compete agreements
12,087

 
(11,555
)
 
532

 
12,168

 
(10,513
)
 
1,655

Intellectual property
5,730

 
(2,608
)
 
3,122

 
5,765

 
(1,879
)
 
3,886

Tradename
6,752

 
(5,404
)
 
1,348

 
4,797

 
(3,879
)
 
918

Backlog
5,290

 
(1,721
)
 
3,569

 

 

 

Total purchased intangible assets
$
77,038

 
$
(50,737
)
 
$
26,301

 
$
68,299

 
$
(40,791
)
 
$
27,508

Amortization expense related to purchased intangible assets was $3.4 million and $3.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $10.4 million and $9.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense as of September 30, 2014 is $3.2 million for the remainder of 2014, $9.0 million for 2015, $5.9 million for 2016, $4.4 million for 2017, $2.7 million for 2018, and $1.1 million thereafter.
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company performed an impairment review of the customer list intangible asset obtained in its acquisition of Nitro in 2009. The impairment review was triggered by certain legacy Nitro customers having notified the Company of their intentions to cease or reduce purchases of the Company’s services. In the first step of the March 31, 2013 impairment review, the carrying value of the asset exceeded the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset, indicating that the carrying value was not recoverable. In the second step, the impairment amounts of $0.6 million and $1.5 million were recorded in the three months ended September 30 and March 31, 2013, respectively, which were estimated using a discounted cash flows approach. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, there were no triggering events that required the Company to perform an impairment review. The net book value of the Nitro customer list intangible asset was $0.1 million as of September 30, 2014.
In estimating the undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by this intangible asset, management considered the following factors: actual customer attrition rates since the acquisition date; expected future attrition rates; estimated undiscounted net cash flows generated by the intangible asset since the acquisition date; estimated undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the intangible asset over its remaining expected useful life; and the expected remaining useful life of the intangible asset. In the course of these impairment reviews, the Company considered multiple future scenarios and the expected likelihood of those scenarios occurring, based on the information which was known to management at the times the reviews were performed. These impairment reviews involved the use of significant judgment by management, and different judgments could yield different results.
(13) Restructuring and Other Related Charges (Benefits)
Short-term and long-term restructuring and other related liabilities are recorded in "Accrued expenses" and "Other long-term liabilities," respectively, in the consolidated and condensed balance sheets.

20


2014 Restructuring Event
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $1.1 million and $3.0 million, respectively, related to cash severance and other termination benefits for approximately 93 employees across multiple functions. Substantially all of the workforce charges were related to the Company's SapientNitro reportable segment.
2013 Restructuring Event
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $2.0 million related to cash severance and other termination benefits for approximately 82 employees across multiple functions. Of the total charges, $1.3 million and $0.5 million were recorded to the Company's SapientNitro and Global Markets reportable segments, respectively.
The following table presents activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 related to all restructuring events (in thousands):
 
Other Prior Restructuring Events
 
2014 Restructuring Event
 
 
 
Facilities
 
Workforce
 
Facilities
 
Workforce
 
Totals
Balance at December 31, 2013
$
185

 
$
312

 
$

 
$

 
$
497

2014 (benefits) provisions, net
(21
)
 

 
154

 
2,856

 
2,989

Cash utilized
(67
)
 
(308
)
 
(47
)
 
(2,132
)
 
(2,554
)
Foreign currency exchange rate effect

 
(4
)
 
(13
)
 
(29
)
 
(46
)
Balance at September 30, 2014
$
97

 
$

 
$
94

 
$
695

 
$
886

The total remaining accrued restructuring balance of $0.9 million as of September 30, 2014 is expected to be paid in full by March 31, 2016.
(14) Foreign Currency Exposures and Derivative Instruments
Foreign Currency Transaction Exposure
Foreign currency transaction exposure is derived primarily from intercompany transactions of a short-term nature and transactions with clients or vendors in currencies other than the functional currency of the legal entity in which the transaction is recorded. Assets and liabilities arising from such transactions are translated into the legal entity’s functional currency at each reporting period using period-end exchange rates, and any resulting gain or loss as a result of currency fluctuations is recorded in “General and administrative expenses” in the Company’s unaudited consolidated and condensed statements of operations. Foreign currency transaction net losses and net gains of $(2.4) million and $1.1 million were recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Foreign currency transaction net losses of $3.3 million and $0.7 million were recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Foreign Currency Translation Exposure
Foreign currency translation exposure is derived from the translation of the financial statements of the Company’s subsidiaries for which the functional currency is not the U.S. dollar into U.S. dollars for consolidated reporting purposes. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at period-end exchange rates, and statement of operations amounts are translated into U.S. dollars using individual transactional exchange rates or average monthly exchange rates. The functional currency for the majority of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is considered to be the local currency and, accordingly, translation adjustments for those subsidiaries are recorded in the unaudited consolidated and condensed balance sheets as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, in the caption “Accumulated other comprehensive loss”.
The Company manages its foreign currency exposures through a risk management program which is designed to mitigate its exposure to operating expenses incurred by foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency is the Indian rupee and operating margins in foreign subsidiaries whose functional currencies are the British pound sterling and the euro. This program includes the use of derivative financial instruments, consisting of foreign currency option contracts, which are not designated as accounting hedges. The Company uses these instruments to mitigate its exposure to movements of the Indian rupee, British pound sterling, and euro, relative to the U.S. dollar. The Company records all derivative instruments on its consolidated balance sheets at fair value. Changes in a derivative’s fair value through the settlement date are recognized in current period earnings unless specific hedge criteria are met.

21


Currently, the Company enters into 30-day average rate instruments covering rolling periods of up to four months, with the following notional amounts outstanding as of September 30, 2014: 
1.5 billion Indian rupees (approximately $24.5 million);
5 million British pounds sterling (approximately $8.1 million); and
1.3 million euros (approximately $1.6 million).
Because these instruments are average rate option collars that are settled on a net basis with the counterparty banks, the Company has not recorded the gross underlying notional amounts in its unaudited consolidated and condensed balance sheets as of September 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013. Open option positions as of September 30, 2014 will settle in the three month period ending December 31, 2014. None of the Company’s derivative financial instruments qualified for hedge accounting.
The following table presents the fair values of the derivative assets and liabilities recorded on the Company’s unaudited consolidated and condensed balance sheets as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands): 
 
 
 
September 30,
 
December 31,
Derivative Instrument
Balance Sheet Classification
 
2014
 
2013
Foreign exchange option contracts (asset)
Prepaid and other current assets
 
$
294

 
$
129

Foreign exchange option contracts (liability)
Accrued expenses
 
$
46

 
$
175

Realized and unrealized gains and losses on the Company’s foreign exchange option contracts are included in “General and administrative expenses” in the unaudited consolidated and condensed statements of operations. The following table presents the effect of net realized and unrealized gains and losses relating to the Company’s foreign exchange option contracts on its results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended  
 September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Realized/Unrealized gain (loss) on financial instruments
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
As Restated
Net realized gain (loss) on foreign exchange option contracts not designated as accounting hedges
$
72

 
$
(1,701
)
 
$
256

 
$
(1,625
)
Net unrealized gain (loss) on foreign exchange option contracts not designated as accounting hedges
259

 
683

 
238

 
(88
)
Total
$
331

 
$
(1,018
)
 
$
494

 
$
(1,713
)
(15) Stockholders’ Equity
The Company uses the cost method to account for its treasury stock transactions. Shares of treasury stock are issued in connection with the Company’s stock option plans, restricted stock plans, employee stock purchase plan, and acquisitions using the average cost basis method. On May 9, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $100 million of the Company’s common stock within two years from the authorization date. Under the program, management of the Company was authorized to repurchase shares through Rule 10b5-1 plans, open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, block purchases or otherwise in accordance with applicable federal securities laws, including Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act. Depending on market conditions and other factors, the repurchases may be commenced or suspended at any time or from time to time, without prior notice. In 2014, under this program, the Company repurchased 70,010 shares of its common stock, at an average price of $15.93 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $1.1 million. Through May 9, 2014, the Company repurchased 4,338,306 shares of its common stock, at an average price of $10.67 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $46.3 million. As of May 9, 2014, the authorization for the program expired.
On May 12, 2014, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $150 million of the Company’s common stock (the "2014 Repurchase Program"). Under this new program, management of the Company is authorized to repurchase shares through Rule 10b5-1 plans, open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, block purchases or otherwise in accordance with applicable federal securities laws, including Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act. Depending on market conditions and other factors, the repurchases may be commenced or suspended at any time or from time to time, without prior notice. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, under this program, the Company repurchased 752,873 shares of its common stock at an average price of $14.75 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $11.1 million, including transaction costs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, under this program, the Company repurchased

22


992,673 shares of its common stock at an average price of $15.14 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $15.0 million, including transaction costs. As of September 30, 2014, $135.0 million remained available for repurchases under this program. The 2014 Repurchase Program will expire upon the earlier of the date on which the program is terminated by the Board of Directors or when all authorized repurchases are completed. The Company made additional purchases under the 2014 Repurchase Program between October 1, 2014 and October 31, 2014. However, the Company does not intend to make further repurchases under the 2014 Repurchase Program.
(16) Line of Credit
On July 11, 2012, Sapient International GmbH, a Switzerland subsidiary of the Company (the “Borrower”), entered into an uncommitted, multi-currency revolving credit facility (the “Facility”) with a bank. The Facility permits the Borrower to request advances for general working capital purposes, in U.S. dollars, British pounds sterling and euros, not to exceed an equivalent of $20 million U.S. dollars in the aggregate. On April 29, 2014, the Company amended the Facility primarily to add Sapient Limited, a subsidiary of Sapient U.K., as an additional borrower. All other terms of the amended facility remained consistent with the original Facility. For each advance, the Borrower requests a term of one, two, three or six months, or such other period to which the Borrower and the bank may agree. Each advance is due for repayment on the last day of the agreed-upon term, or upon demand by the bank or termination of the Facility. Each advance bears interest at an annualized rate equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) benchmark rate in effect on the advance date and applicable to the relevant term plus 2.25%. Interest is payable every three months, or at the end of the relevant advance term if such term is less than three months. The Facility does not have a contractual term, but the bank may terminate the Facility at any time. The Facility does not include any financial covenants. Any obligations incurred by the Borrower under the Facility are guaranteed at all times by Sapient Corporation. As of November 6, 2014, the Borrower had not drawn any advances under the Facility.
(17) Restatement
As disclosed previously in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company restated its consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and its unaudited quarterly financial information for each of the quarters in the year ended December 31, 2012 and for the first three quarters in the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily to correct the manner in which the Company recorded certain tax liabilities resulting from the movement of employees globally.
As disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company identified certain prior period errors which affected the interim and annual periods in the years ended December 31, 2006 through 2012. The prior period errors primarily relate to the Company’s unrecorded corporate income and employment tax liabilities resulting from cross-border mobility of employees into various countries in prior periods. More specifically, the Company concluded that during those prior periods several of its subsidiaries had created previously unrecognized permanent establishments in foreign tax jurisdictions as a result of employees working in those foreign countries, which triggered corporate income tax liabilities for those subsidiaries and individual-tax liabilities for some of those employees. The net expense recorded in the interim and annual periods in the years ended December 31, 2006 through December 31, 2012 amounted to $14.2 million.
Also, as disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company identified certain prior period errors which affected the interim and annual periods in the years ended December 31, 2010 through 2012 and the first three quarters in the year ended December 31, 2013. The prior period errors primarily relate to the Company's unrecorded employment-related tax liabilities associated with the movement of employees globally. More specifically, the Company did not properly report the appropriate amount of income, and did not withhold and remit the appropriate amount of employment-related tax resulting from taxable benefits provided to certain employees on foreign long-term assignments for those periods. The net expense recorded in the interim and annual periods in the years ended December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2012 amounted to $13.1 million. The net expense recorded in the interim periods ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2013 amounted to $2.3 million.
Although the Company believes the recorded employment-related tax liabilities associated with the movement of employees globally are appropriate, the final determination of tax audits and settlement discussions with local tax authorities could result in potential favorable or unfavorable changes to these estimates. The Company anticipates to settle substantially all of the employment-related tax liabilities in the next twelve months.
In addition, as disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company also corrected certain other immaterial prior period errors in the Company’s consolidated financial statements into the periods in which they originated.
In evaluating whether the Company’s previously issued consolidated financial statements were materially misstated, the Company considered the guidance in ASC Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, ASC Topic 250-10-S99-1,

23


Assessing Materiality, and ASC Topic 250-10-S99-2, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. The Company concluded that these errors were in the aggregate material to the prior reporting periods, and therefore, restatement of previously filed financial statements was necessary.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 includes the impact of the restatement on the comparative unaudited quarterly financial information for the quarter ended September 30, 2013
The account balances labeled "As Reported" in the following tables for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 represent the previously reported unaudited balances in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013.
The effects of these prior period errors on the unaudited consolidated financial statements are as follows:
 
September 30, 2013
 
As Reported
 
Adjustments
 
As Restated
Consolidated Unaudited Balance Sheet:
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
ASSETS
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
272,756

 
$

 
$
272,756

Marketable securities, current portion
7,310

 

 
7,310

Restricted cash, current portion
101

 

 
101

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0 at September 30, 2013
175,618

 

 
175,618

Unbilled revenues
104,865

 

 
104,865

Deferred tax assets, current portion
16,281

 

 
16,281

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
44,742

 
(7,480
)
 
37,262

Total current assets
621,673

 
(7,480
)
 
614,193

Restricted cash, net of current portion
2,042

 

 
2,042

Property and equipment, net
83,166

 
81

 
83,247

Purchased intangible assets, net
24,068

 

 
24,068

Goodwill
134,359

 

 
134,359

Other assets
8,914

 
13,382

 
22,296

Total assets
$
874,222

 
$
5,983

 
$
880,205

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
25,166

 
$

 
$
25,166

Accrued expenses
49,275

 
806

 
50,081

Accrued compensation
105,422

 
(16,688
)
 
88,734

Income taxes payable
17,427

 
(6,427
)
 
11,000

Deferred revenues
23,326

 

 
23,326

Total current liabilities
220,616

 
(22,309
)
 
198,307

Deferred tax liabilities, net of current portion
20,798

 

 
20,798

Other long-term liabilities
66,534

 
40,060

 
106,594

Total liabilities
307,948

 
17,751

 
325,699

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

Noncontrolling interest subject to put provisions
923

 

 
923

Stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized and none issued or outstanding at September 30, 2013

 

 

Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 144,326,146 shares issued, and 140,120,721 shares outstanding at September 30, 2013
1,443

 

 
1,443

Additional paid-in capital
578,160

 

 
578,160

Treasury stock, at cost, 4,205,425 shares at September 30, 2013
(44,435
)
 

 
(44,435
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(40,328
)
 

 
(40,328
)
Retained earnings
70,511

 
(11,768
)
 
58,743

Total Sapient Corporation stockholders' equity
565,351

 
(11,768
)
 
553,583

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
874,222

 
$
5,983

 
$
880,205


24


 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30, 2013
 
September 30, 2013
 
As Reported
 
Adjustments
 
As Restated
 
As Reported
 
Adjustments
 
As Restated
Consolidated Unaudited Statement of Operations:
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Service revenues
$
323,793

 
$

 
$
323,793

 
$
930,765

 
$

 
$
930,765

Reimbursable expenses
11,087

 

 
11,087

 
33,705

 

 
33,705

Total gross revenues
334,880

 

 
334,880

 
964,470

 

 
964,470

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Project personnel expenses
218,977

 
677

 
219,654

 
637,258

 
2,031

 
639,289

Reimbursable expenses
11,087

 

 
11,087

 
33,705

 

 
33,705

Total project personnel expenses and reimbursable expenses
230,064

 
677

 
230,741

 
670,963

 
2,031

 
672,994

Selling and marketing expenses
11,968

 
(42
)
 
11,926

 
36,754

 
(125
)
 
36,629

General and administrative expenses
52,136

 
177

 
52,313

 
159,657

 
531

 
160,188

Restructuring and other related (benefits) charges
(28
)
 

 
(28
)
 
1,955

 

 
1,955

Amortization of purchased intangible assets
3,007

 

 
3,007

 
9,927

 

 
9,927

Acquisition costs and other related benefits
(1,268
)
 

 
(1,268
)
 
(1,652
)
 

 
(1,652
)
Impairment of intangible asset
596

 

 
596

 
2,090

 

 
2,090

Total operating expenses
296,475

 
812

 
297,287

 
879,694

 
2,437

 
882,131

Income from operations
38,405

 
(812
)
 
37,593

 
84,776

 
(2,437
)
 
82,339

Interest income
1,492

 
1

 
1,493

 
4,569

 
1

 
4,570

Interest expense
(636
)
 

 
(636
)
 
(1,997
)
 

 
(1,997
)
Other income, net
484

 

 
484

 
840

 

 
840

Income before income taxes
39,745

 
(811
)
 
38,934

 
88,188

 
(2,436
)
 
85,752

Provision for income taxes
12,986

 
(309
)
 
12,677

 
31,612

 
(738
)
 
30,874

Net income
26,759

 
(502
)
 
26,257

 
56,576

 
(1,698
)
 
54,878

Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
(88
)
 

 
(88
)
 
(175
)
 

 
(175
)
Net income attributable to stockholders of Sapient Corporation
$
26,847

 
$
(502
)
 
$
26,345

 
$
56,751

 
$
(1,698
)
 
$
55,053

Basic net income per share attributable to stockholders of Sapient Corporation
$
0.19

 
$

 
$
0.19

 
$
0.41

 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.40

Diluted net income per share attributable to stockholders of Sapient Corporation
$
0.19

 
$

 
$
0.19

 
$
0.40

 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.39

Weighted average common shares
139,959

 

 
139,959

 
139,202

 

 
139,202

Weighted average dilutive common share equivalents
2,302

 

 
2,302

 
3,731

 

 
3,731

Weighted average common shares and dilutive common share equivalents
142,261

 

 
142,261

 
142,933

 

 
142,933

 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30, 2013
 
September 30, 2013
 
As Reported
 
Adjustments
 
As Restated
 
As Reported
 
Adjustments
 
As Restated
Consolidated Unaudited Statement of Comprehensive Income:
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income
$
26,759

 
$
(502
)
 
$
26,257

 
$
56,576

 
$
(1,698
)
 
$
54,878

Other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Foreign currency translation adjustments
2,614

 

 
2,614

 
(14,449
)
 

 
(14,449
)
Net unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale investments, net of taxes
(55
)
 

 
(55
)
 
1

 

 
1

Reclassification adjustment for realized loss on available-for-sale investments, net of taxes

 

 

 
28

 

 
28

Net unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale investments
(55
)
 

 
(55
)
 
29

 

 
29

Other comprehensive income (loss)
2,559

 

 
2,559

 
(14,420
)
 

 
(14,420
)
Total comprehensive income (loss)
29,318

 
(502
)
 
28,816

 
42,156

 
(1,698
)
 
40,458

Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
(92
)
 

 
(92
)
 
(282
)
 

 
(282
)
Comprehensive income attributable to stockholders of Sapient Corporation
$
29,410

 
$
(502
)
 
$
28,908

 
$
42,438

 
$
(1,698
)
 
$
40,740




25


 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30, 2013
 
As Reported
 
Adjustments
 
As Restated
Consolidated Unaudited Statement of Cash Flows:
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
56,576

 
$
(1,698
)
 
$
54,878

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred income taxes
(608
)
 
(1,642
)
 
(2,250
)
Unrealized loss on financial instruments
88

 

 
88

Loss recognized on disposition of fixed assets
1,043

 

 
1,043

Depreciation expense
20,233

 
18

 
20,251

Amortization of purchased intangible assets
9,927

 

 
9,927

Loss recognized on sale of available-for-sale marketable securities
28

 

 
28

Impairment of intangible asset
2,090

 

 
2,090

Stock-based compensation expense
23,142

 

 
23,142

Excess tax benefits from exercise and release of stock-based awards
(2,024
)
 

 
(2,024
)
Non-cash restructuring charges
146

 

 
146

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding impact of acquisitions:
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
(6,659
)
 

 
(6,659
)
Unbilled revenues
(32,984
)
 

 
(32,984
)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
5,773

 

 
5,773

Other assets
(144
)
 

 
(144
)
Accounts payable
907

 

 
907

Accrued compensation
(72
)
 
(2,467
)
 
(2,539
)
Deferred revenues
(4,979
)
 

 
(4,979
)
Accrued expenses
(4,988
)
 
85

 
(4,903
)
Income taxes payable
11,482

 
904

 
12,386

Other long-term liabilities
(3,525
)
 
4,800

 
1,275

Net cash provided by operating activities
75,452

 

 
75,452

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases of property and equipment and cost of internally developed software
(27,201
)
 

 
(27,201
)
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
(4,993
)
 

 
(4,993
)
Sales of marketable securities classified as available-for-sale
1,372

 

 
1,372

Purchases of marketable securities classified as available-for-sale
(1,916
)
 

 
(1,916
)
Acquisition of cost method investment
(200
)
 

 
(200
)
Cash paid on financial instruments, net
(1,624
)
 

 
(1,624
)
Change in restricted cash
3,941

 

 
3,941

Net cash used in investing activities
(30,621
)
 

 
(30,621
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 

 
 
Excess tax benefits from exercise and release of stock-based awards
2,024

 

 
2,024

Proceeds from stock option and purchase plans
2,703

 

 
2,703

Net cash provided by financing activities
4,727

 

 
4,727

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(10,840
)
 

 
(10,840
)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
38,718

 

 
38,718

Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
234,038

 

 
234,038

Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period
$
272,756

 
$

 
$
272,756

(18) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements, Going Concern. ASU 2014-15 will explicitly require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide related footnote disclosure in certain circumstances. The new standard will be effective for all entities in the first annual period ending after December 15, 2016 and earlier adoption is permitted. Management does not expect that the application of ASU 2014-15 will have an impact on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

26


In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This ASU is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and early adoption is not permitted. Accordingly, the Company will adopt this ASU on January 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating which transition approach to use and the impact of the adoption of this ASU on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11 (“ASU 2013-11”), Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. This amendment requires entities to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward, unless certain conditions exist. This guidance is effective prospectively for annual reporting periods (and the interim periods within) beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption and retrospective application are permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2013-11 effective January 1, 2014 and this adoption did not have a material impact on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05 (“ASU 2013-05”), Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity. This amendment requires a parent company to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income only if a sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. This guidance is effective prospectively for annual reporting periods (and the interim periods within) beginning after December 15, 2013. Early adoption and retrospective application are permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2013-05 effective January 1, 2014 and this adoption did not have a material impact on the Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

27


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements
As discussed further in Note 17, Restatement, in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1, Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we have restated our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and our unaudited quarterly financial information for each of the quarters in the year ended December 31, 2012 and for the first three quarters in the year ended December 31, 2013.
For information regarding our controls and procedures, see Part I, Item 4, Controls and Procedures, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Overview
We help clients identify and act upon opportunities to improve their business performance by capitalizing on changes, disruptions, or opportunities that exist in their business or industry. We market our services through three business units — SapientNitro, Sapient Global Markets, and Sapient Government Services — positioned at the intersection of marketing, business and technology. SapientNitro is a new breed of agency that helps clients tell their stories through seamless experiences across brand communications, digital engagement, and omni-channel commerce. SapientNitro offers services including integrated marketing and creative services, web and interactive development, traditional advertising, media planning and buying, strategic planning and marketing analytics, multi-channel commerce strategy and solutions including a significant focus on mobile, and content and asset management strategies and solutions. Sapient Global Markets provides business and technology services including integrated advisory, program management, analytics, technology and operations services to leaders in banking, investment management, energy and commodity industries. A core focus area within Sapient Global Markets is trading and risk management, to which we bring more than 15 years of experience and a globally integrated service in derivatives processing. Sapient Government Services provides consulting, technology, and marketing services to U.S. governmental agencies, nonprofit organizations (“NPOs”), and non-governmental organizations (“NGOs”). Focused on driving long-term change and transforming the citizen experience, we use technology, marketing services and communications to help our clients become more accessible, transparent, and effective.
Founded in 1990 and incorporated in Delaware in 1991, we maintain a strong global presence with offices around the world. We utilize our proprietary Global Distributed Delivery (“GDD”) model in support of our SapientNitro and Sapient Global Markets segments. Our GDD model enables us to perform services on a continuous basis through global client teams and provide high-quality, cost-effective solutions under accelerated assignment schedules. By engaging India’s skilled technology specialists, we can provide services at lower total costs as well as offer a continuous delivery capability resulting from time differences between India and the countries we serve.
We have established and continuously promote a strong corporate culture based on our “strategic context” — purpose, core company values, vision, goals and client value proposition — which is critical to our success. Our value proposition includes helping clients tell their stories through seamless experiences across brand communications, digital engagement, and omni-channel commerce. This also includes offering integrated marketing and creative services, web and interactive development, traditional advertising, media planning and buying, strategic planning and marketing analytics, multi-channel commerce strategy and solutions including a significant focus on mobile, and content and asset management strategies and solutions. In addition, our value proposition refers to our strategy of helping clients identify and act upon opportunities to improve their business performance by capitalizing on changes, disruptions, or opportunities that exist in their business or industry.
Recent Developments
On November 1, 2014, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Publicis Groupe S.A., a French société anonyme (“Publicis Groupe ”), and 1926 Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Publicis Groupe (“Merger Sub”). Under the Merger Agreement, Publicis Groupe will cause Merger Sub to commence a cash tender offer (the “Offer”) within 10 business days following the date of the Merger Agreement, for all of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Shares”), at a purchase price of $25.00 per Share, net to the seller in cash, without interest, subject to any required withholding of taxes.  The Offer will remain open for a minimum of 20 business days from the date of commencement. The transaction was unanimously approved by the Board of Directors of Sapient and the Management and Supervisory Boards of Publicis Groupe. The obligation of Merger Sub to purchase the Shares in the Offer is subject to certain closing conditions, including the Shares having been validly tendered and not withdrawn representing at least a majority of the total number of Shares then-outstanding, expiration or termination of applicable waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the antitrust, competition and trade regulation laws of Germany, the conclusion or termination of review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States and certain other regulatory approvals. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2015, although there can be no assurance the transaction will close within the expected timeframe or at all.

28


If the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, Sapient may be obligated to pay Publicis Groupe a termination fee of $125.0 million.
For further information regarding the transaction and the Merger Agreement, please refer to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2014, with which the Merger Agreement is filed as Exhibit 2.1.
Summary of Results of Operations
The following table presents a summary of our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Increase / (Decrease)
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
Increase
 
2014
 
2013
 
Dollars
 
Percentage
 
2014

2013
 
Dollars
 
Percentage
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
 



As Restated
 
 
 
 
Service revenues
$
350,704

 
$
323,793

 
$
26,911

 
8
 %
 
$
1,054,432

 
$
930,765

 
$
123,667

 
13
%
Income from operations
$
33,817

 
$
37,593

 
$
(3,776
)
 
(10
)%
 
$
88,995

 
$
82,339

 
$
6,656

 
8
%
Net income attributable to stockholders of Sapient Corporation
$
22,267

 
$
26,345

 
$
(4,078
)
 
(15
)%
 
$
59,178

 
$
55,053

 
$
4,125

 
7
%
The increases in service revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 were due primarily to higher demand for our services from new and existing customers, and, to a lesser extent, revenues generated from acquisitions completed during the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
The decrease in income from operations for the three months ended September 30, 2014, was primarily due to increases in project personnel expenses and increases in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of service revenues and acquisition costs and other related charges (benefits), partially offset by the increase in service revenues. The increase in income from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, was primarily due to the increase in service revenues, and a decrease in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of service revenues.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In our quarterly and annual reports, earnings press releases, and conference calls, we discuss two key measures that are not calculated according to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The first non-GAAP measure is income from operations, as reported on our consolidated statements of operations, excluding certain expenses and benefits, which we refer to as “non-GAAP income from operations.” The second measure calculates non-GAAP income from operations as a percentage of reported services revenues, which we refer to as “non-GAAP operating margin”. Management believes that these non-GAAP measures help illustrate underlying trends in our business. We use these measures to establish budgets and operational goals (communicated internally and externally), manage our business and evaluate our performance. We exclude certain expenses and benefits from non-GAAP income from operations that we believe are not reflective of the underlying business trends and are not useful measures in determining our operational performance and overall business strategy. Because our reported non-GAAP financial measures are not calculated according to GAAP, these measures may not necessarily be comparable to GAAP or similarly described non-GAAP measures reported by other companies within our industry. Consequently, our non-GAAP financial measures should not be evaluated in isolation or supplant comparable GAAP measures, but, rather, should be considered together with our unaudited consolidated and condensed financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with GAAP and included in Part I, Item 1, Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following table reconciles income from operations as reported on our unaudited consolidated and condensed statements of operations to non-GAAP income from operations, and GAAP operating margin to

29


non-GAAP operating margin, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):
 
Three Months Ended  
 September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014

2013
 


 
As Restated
 



As Restated
Service revenues
$
350,704

 
$
323,793

 
$
1,054,432


$
930,765

GAAP income from operations
$
33,817

 
$
37,593

 
$
88,995


$
82,339

Stock-based compensation expense
8,344

 
8,152

 
24,438


23,142

Restructuring and other related charges (benefits)
1,125

 
(28
)
 
2,989


1,955

Amortization of purchased intangible assets
3,389

 
3,007

 
10,430


9,927

Acquisition costs and other related charges (benefits)
1,301

 
(1,268
)
 
1,729


(1,652
)
Impairment of intangible asset

 
596

 


2,090

Other (1)

 

 
2,815



Non-GAAP income from operations
$
47,976

 
$
48,052

 
$
131,396


$
117,801

GAAP operating margin
9.6
%
 
11.6
%
 
8.4
%

8.8
%
Effect of adjustments detailed above
4.1
%
 
3.2
%
 
4.1
%

3.9
%
Non-GAAP operating margin
13.7
%
 
14.8
%
 
12.5
%

12.7
%
(1) In the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we incurred a $2.8 million one-time project personnel expense charge to reimburse employees for costs incurred as part of a restructuring of a global travel program. As this is unrelated to current operations, and neither comparable to prior periods nor predictive of future results, we have excluded it from the non-GAAP income from operations in evaluating management performance.
Please see the Results of Operations section of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis for a more detailed discussion and analysis of restructuring and other related charges (benefits), amortization of purchased intangible assets, acquisition costs and other related charges (benefits), and impairment of intangible asset.
When important to management’s analysis, operating results are compared in “constant currency terms”, a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes the effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The effect of exchange rate fluctuations is excluded by translating the current period’s local currency service revenues and expenses into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rates of the prior period of comparison. For a discussion of our exposure to exchange rates, see Part I, Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Summary of Critical Accounting Policies; Significant Judgments and Estimates
We have identified the accounting policies which are critical to understanding our business and our results of operations. Management believes that there have been no significant changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 to the items disclosed in our summary of critical accounting policies, significant judgments and estimates in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report in Part II, Item 7, on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.


30


Results of Operations
Three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to three and nine months ended September 30, 2013
The following table presents the components of our unaudited consolidated and condensed statements of operations as percentages of service revenues:
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
As Restated
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Service revenues
100.0
 %
 
100.0
 %
 
100.0
 %
 
100.0
 %
Reimbursable expenses
4.0
 %
 
3.4
 %
 
4.0
 %
 
3.6
 %
Total gross revenues
104.0
 %
 
103.4
 %
 
104.0
 %
 
103.6
 %
Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Project personnel expenses
67.5
 %
 
67.9
 %
 
69.0
 %

68.7
 %
Reimbursable expenses
4.0
 %
 
3.4
 %
 
4.0
 %
 
3.6
 %
Total project personnel expenses and reimbursable expenses
71.5
 %
 
71.3
 %
 
73.0
 %
 
72.3
 %
Selling and marketing expenses
3.9
 %
 
3.7
 %
 
4.2
 %

3.9
 %
General and administrative expenses
17.3
 %
 
16.2
 %
 
16.9
 %

17.2
 %
Restructuring and other related charges (benefits)
0.3
 %
 
 %
 
0.3
 %
 
0.2
 %
Amortization of purchased intangible assets
1.0
 %
 
0.9
 %
 
1.0
 %
 
1.1
 %
Acquisition costs and other related charges (benefits)
0.4
 %
 
(0.4
)%
 
0.2
 %
 
(0.2
)%
Impairment of intangible asset
 %
 
0.1
 %
 
 %
 
0.2
 %
Total operating expenses
94.4
 %
 
91.8
 %
 
95.6
 %
 
94.7
 %
Income from operations
9.6
 %
 
11.6
 %
 
8.4
 %
 
8.9
 %
Interest income
0.6
 %
 
0.5
 %
 
0.6
 %
 
0.5
 %
Interest expense
(0.2
)%
 
(0.3
)%
 
(0.2
)%
 
(0.2
)%
Other income, net
 %
 
0.2
 %
 
0.1
 %
 
 %
Income before income taxes
10.0
 %
 
12.0
 %
 
8.9
 %
 
9.2
 %
Provision for income taxes
3.6
 %
 
3.9
 %
 
3.3
 %
 
3.3
 %
Net income
6.4
 %
 
8.1
 %
 
5.6
 %
 
5.9
 %
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
 %
 
 %
 
 %
 
 %
Net income attributable to stockholders of Sapient Corporation
6.4
 %
 
8.1
 %
 
5.6
 %
 
5.9
 %
Service Revenues
Our service revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
 
Three Months Ended  
 September 30,
 
Increase
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
Increase
 
2014
 
2013
 
Dollars
 
Percentage
 
2014
 
2013
 
Dollars
 
Percentage
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
Service revenues
$
350,704

 
$
323,793

 
$
26,911

 
8
%
 
$
1,054,432

 
$
930,765

 
$
123,667

 
13
%
The increase in service revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was due primarily to higher demand for our services from new and existing customers, and, to a lesser extent, revenues generated from acquisitions completed during the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

31


The following table presents service revenues by industry sector for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):
 
Three Months Ended  
 September 30,
 
Increase / (Decrease)
 
2014
 
2013
 
Dollars
 
Percentage
Industry Sector
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
Consumer, Travel & Automotive
$
151,646

 
$
133,035

 
$
18,611

 
14
 %
Financial Services
104,718

 
100,450

 
4,268

 
4
 %
Government, Health & Education
43,822

 
33,630

 
10,192

 
30
 %
Energy Services
29,487

 
27,405

 
2,082

 
8
 %
Technology & Communications
21,031

 
29,273

 
(8,242
)
 
(28
)%
Total service revenues
$
350,704

 
$
323,793

 
$
26,911

 
8
 %
For the three months ended September 30, 2014, service revenues in the United States increased 6%, while international service revenues increased 12% as compared to the same period in 2013. In constant currency terms, total service revenues were up 7% in the three months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013.
The 8% increase in service revenues in the three months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 was primarily due to people count, utilization, shift in delivery personnel mix, and contractor usage. Our average delivery personnel people count at September 30, 2014 increased 12% compared to the same period in 2013. Utilization, which represents the percentage of our delivery personnel’s time spent on billable client work, was 73% for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 72% for the same period in 2013. Contractor and consultant usage, measured by expense, increased by 15% for the three months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013, based on our needs in specialized areas for certain client contracts.
No individual client accounted for more than 10% of our service revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. Our five largest clients, in the aggregate, accounted for 14% of our service revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 16% for the same period in 2013. Long-term and retainer revenues are revenues from contracts with durations of at least twelve months, and from applications management and long-term support assignments, which are cancelable. Long-term and retainer revenues represented 49% of our total service revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 50% for the same period in 2013.
The following table presents service revenues by industry sector for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
Increase / (Decrease)
 
2014
 
2013
 
Dollars
 
Percentage
Industry Sector
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
Consumer, Travel & Automotive
$
458,539

 
$
384,746

 
$
73,793

 
19
 %
Financial Services
318,708

 
290,743

 
27,965

 
10
 %
Government, Health & Education
128,248

 
95,929

 
32,319

 
34
 %
Energy Services
91,602

 
84,009

 
7,593

 
9
 %
Technology & Communications
57,335

 
75,338

 
(18,003
)
 
(24
)%
Total service revenues
$
1,054,432

 
$
930,765

 
$
123,667

 
13
 %
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, service revenues in the United States increased 12%, while international service revenues increased 16% as compared to the same period in 2013. In constant currency terms, service revenues were up 12% in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to 2013.
The 13% increase in service revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 was primarily due to people count, utilization, shift in delivery personnel mix, and contractor usage. Our average delivery personnel people count at September 30, 2014 increased 13% compared to the same period in 2013. While utilization remained consistent at 72% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013. Contractor and consultant

32


usage, measured by expense, increased by 27% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013, based on our needs in specialized areas for certain client contracts.
No individual client accounted for more than 10% of our service revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. Our five largest clients, in the aggregate, accounted for 15% of our service revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 18% for the same period in 2013. Long-term and retainer revenues represented 47% of our total service revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 52% for the same period in 2013.
See Service Revenues by Reportable Segment below for a discussion of service revenues by reportable segment and industry sector.
Project Personnel Expenses
Project personnel expenses consist primarily of compensation and employee benefits for personnel dedicated to client assignments, contractors and consultants and other direct expenses incurred to complete assignments that were not reimbursed by the client. These expenses represent the most significant costs we incur in providing our services. The following table presents project personnel expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):
 
Three Months Ended  
 September 30,
 
Increase / (Decrease)
 
Percentage
Increase
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
Project personnel expenses
$
236,862

 
$
219,654

 
$
17,208

 
8
%
Project personnel expenses as a percentage of service revenues
67.5
%
 
67.9
%
 
(0.4) points

 
 
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
Increase
 
Percentage
Increase
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
Project personnel expenses
$
727,817

 
$
639,289

 
$
88,528

 
14
%
Project personnel expenses as a percentage of service revenues
69.0
%
 
68.7
%
 
0.3 points

 
 
The increase in project personnel expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was a direct result of our service revenue growth, as we increased delivery personnel peoplecount, use of contractors and consultants and certain other direct expenses in order to fulfill the increase in demand for our services. To a lesser extent, project personnel expenses increased due to the two acquisitions we completed during the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
For the three months ended September 30, 2014, compensation and benefit expenses increased $11.6 million, due to the 12% increase in average delivery peoplecount and additional compensation and benefit expenses as a result of the aforementioned acquisitions. Contractor and consultant expenses increased $3.7 million as our need for contractors and consultants in specialized areas for certain client contracts increased. Travel expense increased $1.7 million based on client project needs. Other project personnel expenses increased, in the aggregate, by $0.2 million.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compensation and benefit expenses increased $58.1 million, due to the 13% increase in average delivery peoplecount and additional compensation and benefit expenses as a result of the increase in peoplecount and, to a lesser extent, the aforementioned acquisitions. Contractor and consultant expenses increased $17.7 million as our need for contractors and consultants in specialized areas for certain client contracts increased. Travel expense increased $8.0 million based on client project needs. Other project personnel expenses increased, in the aggregate, by $4.7 million.
While we believe the previously recorded employment-related tax liabilities associated with the movement of employees globally are appropriate, the final determination of tax audits and settlement discussions with local tax authorities could result in potential favorable or unfavorable changes to these estimates, and as a result, impact project personnel expenses in future periods. We anticipate to settle substantially all of the employment-related tax liabilities in the next twelve months.

33


Selling and Marketing Expenses
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation, employee benefits and travel expenses of selling and marketing personnel, and promotional expenses. The following table presents selling and marketing expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):
 
Three Months Ended  
 September 30,

 

Percentage
Increase
 
2014

2013

Increase





As Restated






Selling and marketing expenses
$
13,556


$
11,926


$
1,630


14
%
Selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of service revenues
3.9
%

3.7
%

0.2 points



 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
 
 
Percentage
Increase
 
2014
 
2013
 
Increase
 
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
Selling and marketing expenses
$
44,313

 
$
36,629

 
$
7,684

 
21
%
Selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of service revenues
4.2
%
 
3.9
%
 
0.3 points

 
 
The increase in selling and marketing expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was due to increases of $0.6 million in trade show expenses, $0.5 million in contractor expenses, and $0.4 million in compensation expenses. Other selling and marketing expenses increased, in the aggregate, by $0.1 million.
The increase in selling and marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was due to increases of $2.4 million in contractor expenses, $2.1 million in compensation expenses relating to an increase in average peoplecount, $1.4 million in trade show expenses, and $1.0 million in travel expenses. Other selling and marketing expenses increased, in the aggregate, by $0.8 million.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and employee benefits associated with our management, legal, finance, information technology, hiring, training and administrative functions, and depreciation and occupancy expenses. The following table presents general and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):
 
Three Months Ended  
 September 30,
 
Increase
 
Percentage Increase
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
General and administrative expenses
$
60,654

 
$
52,313

 
$
8,341

 
16
%
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of service revenues
17.3
%
 
16.2
%
 
1.1 points

 
 
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
Increase / (Decrease)
 
Percentage Increase
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
General and administrative expenses
$
178,159

 
$
160,188

 
$
17,971

 
11
%
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of service revenues
16.9
%
 
17.2
%
 
(0.3) points

 
 
The increase in general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was due to increases of $3.5 million related to net losses on foreign currency transactions, $1.8 million in facilities expense related to new lease agreements, $1.5 million in compensation and benefit expenses relating to an increase in average peoplecount, $1.0 million depreciation expense related to maintenance of properties, and $0.4 million in contractor expenses. Other general and administrative expenses increased, in the aggregate, by $0.1 million.

34


The increase in general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was due to increases of $8.4 million in compensation and benefit expenses relating to an increase in average peoplecount, $5.0 million in facilities expense related to new lease agreements, $2.6 million related to net losses on foreign currency transactions, and $1.3 million in audit and tax fees primarily due to the work associated with the restatement of our consolidated financial statements as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Other general and administrative expenses increased, in aggregate, by $0.7 million.
Restructuring and Other Related Charges (Benefits)
Restructuring and other related charges (benefits) were $1.1 million and less than ($0.1) million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The net charges recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2014, included a restructuring charge of $1.1 million related to cash severance and other termination benefits for approximately 51 employees across multiple functions. The benefits recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2013 included changes to estimates in connection with previously restructured office leases, severance, and other termination benefits.
Restructuring and other related charges were $3.0 million and $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The charges recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2014, related to cash severance and other termination benefits for approximately 93 employees across multiple functions. The net charges recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, included $2.1 million of severance and other termination benefits for 82 employees whose position were made redundant.
Amortization of Purchased Intangible Assets
Purchased intangible assets consisted of non-compete and non-solicitation agreements, customer lists, intellectual property, backlog, and tradenames acquired in business combinations. Amortization of purchased intangible assets was $3.4 million and $10.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to $3.0 million and $9.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. The increase in amortization expense in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily due to the increased amortization expense for new intangible assets acquired in the three months ended March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Acquisition Costs and Other Related Charges (Benefits)
Acquisition costs and other related charges (benefits) include expenses associated with third-party professional services we utilize related to the evaluation of potential targets and the execution of successful acquisitions. Although we may incur costs to evaluate targets, the related potential transaction(s) may never be consummated. Acquisition costs and other related charges also include changes in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities recorded as the result of acquisitions. These liabilities must be measured at fair value on the acquisition date, and until these liabilities are settled, they must be remeasured to fair value each reporting period, with the changes included in earnings. Acquisition costs and other related charges (benefits) were $1.3 million and $(1.3) million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, acquisition costs and other related charges (benefits) were $1.7 million and $(1.7) million, respectively. The increase for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily due to changes in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities and partially due to increases in third-party costs related to the evaluation of potential targets and the acquisitions completed during the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
We recorded contingent consideration liabilities as the result of our acquisitions of La Comunidad and iThink during 2013, (m)Phasize, LLC during 2012, and D&D Holdings Limited during 2011, and we expect to record quarterly remeasurements of the fair value of these liabilities until they are settled at various points in time through 2017. Acquisition costs and other related charges (benefits) recorded in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 included charges of $0.6 million and benefits of $(0.4) million, respectively, compared with benefits of $(1.3) million and $(2.7) million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, which related to the remeasurement of the fair value of these contingent consideration liabilities. We may continue to incur additional acquisition costs and other related charges in future periods resulting from the evaluation of potential acquisition targets.
Impairment of Intangible Asset
During the quarters ended September 30, and March 31, 2013, we performed an impairment review of the customer list intangible asset obtained in our acquisition of Nitro in 2009. The impairment review was triggered by certain legacy Nitro customers having notified us of their intentions to cease or reduce purchases of our services. In the first step of the impairment review, the carrying value of the asset exceeded the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset, indicating that the carrying value was not recoverable. In the second step, the impairment amounts of $0.6 million and $1.5 million were recorded in the three months ended September 30 and March 31, 2013, respectively, were determined as the amounts by which the

35


asset’s carrying amount exceeded its fair value, which were estimated using a discounted cash flow approach. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, there were no triggering events that required the Company to perform an impairment review.
In estimating the undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by this intangible asset, management considered the following factors: actual customer attrition rates since the acquisition date; expected future attrition rates; estimated undiscounted net cash flows generated by the intangible asset since the acquisition date; estimated undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the intangible asset over its remaining expected useful life; and the expected remaining useful life of the intangible asset. In the course of these impairment reviews, we considered multiple future scenarios and the expected likelihood of those scenarios occurring, based on the information which was known to management at the times the reviews were performed. These impairment reviews involved the use of significant judgment by management, and different judgments could yield different results. The net book value of the Nitro customer list intangible asset was $0.1 million as of September 30, 2014.
Interest Income, Interest Expense, and Other Income, Net
Interest income, interest expense, and other income, net, consists primarily of interest income, which is derived from investments in U.S. government securities, bank time deposits and money market funds, interest expense, which consists primarily of imputed interest on rent payments for leased properties of which we are considered the owner for accounting purposes, and other income. The following table presents interest income, interest expense, and other income, net, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):
 
Three Months Ended  
 September 30,
 
Increase/ (Decrease)
 
Percentage Increase / (Decrease)
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
Interest income
$
2,212

 
$
1,493

 
$
719

 
48
 %
Interest expense
$
(924
)
 
$
(636
)
 
$
(288
)
 
45
 %
Other income, net
$
28

 
$
484

 
$
(456
)
 
(94
)%
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
Increase/ (Decrease)
 
Percentage Increase / (Decrease)
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
Interest income
$
6,221

 
$
4,570

 
$
1,651

 
36
 %
Interest expense
$
(2,412
)
 
$
(1,997
)
 
$
(415
)
 
21
 %
Other income, net
$
499

 
$
840

 
$
(341
)
 
(41
)%
Interest income increased in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013 due to higher interest income relating to higher average balances of our interest-bearing foreign currency holdings of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes was $12.8 million and $34.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared with $12.7 million and $30.9 million for the same periods in 2013. Income tax is related to federal, state and foreign tax obligations. The increase in tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily due to the jurisdictional mix of profit before tax. The increase in tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily related to the increase in profit before taxes and the jurisdictional mix.
Our effective tax rate may vary from period to period based on changes in estimated taxable income or loss by jurisdiction, changes to the valuation allowance, changes to federal, state or foreign tax laws, future expansion into countries with varying federal, state, and local income tax rates, deductibility of certain costs and expenses by jurisdiction and as a result of acquisitions. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, our effective tax rate varied from the statutory tax rate primarily due to state income taxes, the tax rate differential attributable to income earned by our foreign subsidiaries, the related mix of jurisdictional profits, and changes in uncertain tax positions.
Deferred tax assets are to be reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available positive and negative evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of September 30, 2014, a valuation allowance is maintained against our U.S. deferred tax assets associated with certain capital losses and state tax

36


net operating loss carryforwards. We continue to believe that the remainder of our U.S. deferred tax assets and the deferred tax assets of our foreign subsidiaries are more likely than not to be realized, and therefore, no valuation allowance has been recorded against these assets.
We had gross unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, of $33.2 million as of September 30, 2014 and $30.8 million as of December 31, 2013. The amounts of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would result in a reduction of our effective tax rate were $32.1 million and $29.7 million as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, accrued interest and penalties were $5.2 million and $4.2 million, respectively.
We conduct business globally, and as a result, we and our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal and state jurisdictions as well as various foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world, including such major jurisdictions as Canada, Germany, India, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. We are currently under tax audits and proceedings in Canada, India, the United Kingdom, and the United States for various periods between 2006 and 2013. The statute of limitations in our other tax jurisdictions remain open for various periods between 2006 and the present. However, carryforward attributes from prior closed years may still be adjusted upon examination by tax authorities if they are used in open periods.
Although we believe our tax estimates are appropriate, the final determination of tax audits and proceedings could result in favorable or unfavorable changes in our estimates. We anticipate the settlement of tax audits and proceedings, as well as the expiration of relevant statutes of limitations in the next twelve months could result in a decrease in our gross unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, of between $13.0 million and $17.0 million.
Results by Reportable Segment
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated on a regular basis by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and in assessing performance. Our CODM is our Chief Executive Officer.
We identify such segments based upon target client markets because each operating segment helps clients identify and act upon opportunities to improve their business performance, but strategically serves a different market. We considered qualitative factors, including the economic characteristics of each operating segment to determine if any qualified for aggregation. More specifically, we evaluated the economic characteristics, the nature of products and services, the methods used to provide services, the types of customers, and the nature of the corresponding regulatory environment of our operating segments. As a result, we have identified the following reportable segments: SapientNitro, Sapient Global Markets, and Sapient Government Services.
The CODM evaluates performance based upon each segment's operating income, which is defined as income before allocations of certain marketing and general and administrative expenses. These charges are excluded from evaluation of performance because these activities and costs generally impact areas that support all of the segments and, therefore, are managed separately. Management does not allocate amortization of purchased intangible assets, acquisition costs and other related charges (benefits), stock-based compensation expense, impairment of intangible asset, restructuring and other related charges (benefits), or interest and other income to the segments for the review of results by the CODM. Asset information by segment is not reported to or reviewed by the CODM, and therefore, we have not disclosed asset information for the segments.

37


The following tables present the service revenues and operating income attributable to our reportable segments for the periods presented (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
As Restated
Service Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SapientNitro
$
233,415

 
$
219,784

 
$
702,717

 
$
628,325

Sapient Global Markets
95,552

 
88,666

 
287,847

 
259,264

Sapient Government Services
21,737

 
15,343

 
63,868

 
43,176

Total service revenues
$
350,704

 
$
323,793

 
$
1,054,432

 
$
930,765

Income Before Income Taxes:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SapientNitro
$
80,937

 
$
73,668

 
$
231,480

 
$
199,265

Sapient Global Markets
27,088

 
27,900

 
82,871

 
79,463

Sapient Government Services
5,497

 
4,840

 
13,341

 
12,656

Total reportable segments operating income (1)
113,522

 
106,408

 
327,692

 
291,384

Less: reconciling items (2)
(78,389
)
 
(67,474
)
 
(234,389
)
 
(205,632
)
Total income before income taxes
$
35,133

 
$
38,934

 
$
93,303

 
$
85,752

 
(1)
Segment operating income reflects only the direct controllable expenses of each business unit segment. It does not represent the total operating results for each business unit, as it does not contain an allocation of certain corporate and general and administrative expenses incurred in support of the business unit segments. Segment operating income reflects restructuring charges allocated to the SapientNitro and Sapient Global Markets reportable segments consisting of immaterial amounts for the three months ended September 30, 2013, and $1.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
(2)
Adjustments that are made to reconcile total reportable segments operating income to consolidated income before income taxes include the following (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended  
 September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
As Restated
Centrally managed functions
$
65,546

 
$
58,356

 
$
196,296

 
$
175,367

Stock-based compensation expense
8,344

 
8,152

 
24,438

 
23,142

Restructuring and other related charges (benefits)
1,125

 
(28
)
 
2,989

 
171

Amortization of purchased intangible assets
3,389

 
3,007

 
10,430

 
9,927

Acquisition costs and other related charges (benefits)
1,301

 
(1,268
)
 
1,729

 
(1,652
)
Impairment of intangible asset

 
596

 

 
2,090

Other (3)

 

 
2,815

 

Interest and other income, net
(1,316
)
 
(1,341
)
 
(4,308
)
 
(3,413
)
Total reconciling items
$
78,389

 
$
67,474

 
$
234,389

 
$
205,632

(3) In the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we incurred a $2.8 million one-time project personnel expense charge to reimburse employees for costs incurred as part of a restructuring of a global travel program. As this is unrelated to current operations, and neither comparable to prior periods nor predictive of future results, we have excluded it from the reportable segments operating income in evaluating management performance.
Service Revenues by Reportable Segment
We do not internally measure or report revenues by individual service offering as providing such information is impracticable and, therefore, we have not disclosed the revenues from external customers for each service offering described in Note 2(m), Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Revenue Recognition, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

38


The following table presents SapientNitro service revenues by industry sector for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):
 
Three Months Ended  
 September 30,
 
Increase / (Decrease)
 
2014
 
2013
 
Dollars
 
Percentage
Industry Sector
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
Consumer, Travel & Automotive
$
151,646

 
$
133,034

 
$
18,612

 
14
 %
Financial Services
37,314

 
38,707

 
(1,393
)
 
(4
)%
Technology & Communications
20,723

 
28,365

 
(7,642
)
 
(27
)%
Government, Health & Education
21,339

 
17,283

 
4,056

 
23
 %
Energy Services
2,393

 
2,395

 
(2
)
 
 %
Total SapientNitro service revenues
$
233,415

 
$
219,784

 
$
13,631

 
6
 %
SapientNitro service revenues increased 6% in the three months ended September 30, 2014, primarily driven by an increase in new clients partially offset by a decrease in revenues from existing clients. The increase was primarily driven by continued strong demand from existing clients in the Consumer, Travel and Automotive industry sector. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Consumer, Travel and Automotive sector service revenues increased 14% as a result of demand from new clients for our services. The increase in new client demand was primarily due to an increasing acceptance of our value proposition, as companies in this sector shift more of their marketing efforts to digital platforms. The Government, Health & Education sector experienced moderate growth as service revenues increased 23% primarily as a result of new clients. These favorable factors were partially offset by a decrease in demand from existing clients in the Technology & Communications and Financial Services industry sectors. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Technology & Communications sector revenues decreased 27%, while the Financial Services sector revenues decreased 4%. SapientNitro experienced flat demand growth from services provided to existing Energy Services clients. Overall, in constant currency terms, SapientNitro service revenues increased 5% for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013.
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
Increase / (Decrease)
 
2014
 
2013
 
Dollars
 
Percentage
Industry Sector
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
Consumer, Travel & Automotive
$
458,539

 
$
384,747

 
$
73,792

 
19
 %
Financial Services
117,322

 
112,209

 
5,113

 
5
 %
Technology & Communications
57,027

 
73,084

 
(16,057
)
 
(22
)%
Government, Health & Education
62,082

 
49,897

 
12,185

 
24
 %
Energy Services
7,747

 
8,388

 
(641
)
 
(8
)%
Total SapientNitro service revenues
$
702,717

 
$
628,325

 
$
74,392

 
12
 %
SapientNitro service revenues increased 12% in the nine months ended September 30, 2014, primarily driven by an increase in demand from new and existing clients, partially offset by a decrease in revenues from existing clients. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in the Consumer, Travel and Automotive industry sector. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Consumer, Travel and Automotive sector service revenues increased 19% based on equally strong demand from new clients as well as continued delivery of high quality services to existing clients. The increase in new client demand was primarily due to an increasing acceptance of our value proposition, as companies in this sector shift more of their marketing efforts to digital platforms. The Financial Services sector revenues increased 5% due to an increase in demand from new clients, partially offset by service revenue decreases from existing customers. The Government, Health & Education sector experienced strong growth as service revenues increased from new clients and continued demand from existing clients during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. These favorable factors were partly offset by a decrease in service revenues in the Technology & Communications industry sector. The Technology & Communications service revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease in existing client revenues, partially offset by new client demand during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. In the nine months ended September 30, 2014, SapientNitro experienced flat demand growth from Energy Services clients. Overall, in constant currency terms, SapientNitro service revenues increased 11% during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013.

39


The following table presents Sapient Global Markets service revenues by industry sector for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):
 
Three Months Ended  
 September 30,
 
Increase / (Decrease)
 
2014

2013
 
Dollars
 
Percentage
Industry Sector
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
Financial Services
$
68,207


$
61,975


$
6,232


10
 %
Energy Services
27,094


25,011


2,083


8
 %
Government, Health & Education
251


1,680


(1,429
)

(85
)%
Total Sapient Global Markets service revenues
$
95,552


$
88,666


$
6,886


8
 %
Sapient Global Markets service revenues increased by 8% in the three months ended September 30, 2014 compared to 2013. The Financial Services sector service revenues increased 10% in the three months ended September 30, 2014, due to an increase in demand from both new and existing clients. The Energy Services sector revenues increased 8% in the three months ended September 30, 2014, principally due to an increase in new client service revenues. The Government, Health & Education sector revenues decreased 85% due to decreases in service revenues from existing clients. In constant currency terms, Sapient Global Markets service revenues increased 7% for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013.
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
Increase / (Decrease)
 
2014
 
2013
 
Dollars
 
Percentage
Industry Sector
 
 
As Restated
 
 
 
 
Financial Services
$
201,694

 
$
178,744

 
$
22,950

 
13
 %
Energy Services
83,855

 
75,621

 
8,234

 
11
 %
Government, Health & Education
2,298

 
4,899

 
(2,601
)
 
(53
)%
Total Sapient Global Markets service revenues
$
287,847

 
$
259,264

 
$
28,583

 
11
 %
Sapient Global Markets service revenues increased by 11% in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to 2013. The Financial Services sector revenues increased 13% in the nine months ended September 30, 2014, due to strong demand from existing clients for our services, and to a lesser extent new client service revenues. The Energy Services sector revenues increased 11% in the nine months ended September 30, 2014, primarily due to an increase in new client service revenues and strong demand from existing clients. The Government, Health & Education sector revenues decreased 53% due to a reduction of work from our existing clients. In constant currency terms, Sapient Global Markets service revenues increased 10% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013.
Service revenues for the Sapient Government Services segment (which are derived entirely from the Government, Health & Education industry sector) increased by $6.4 million, or 42%, in the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 2013, primarily due to an increase in service revenue as a result of the acquisition of OnPoint Consulting, Inc. (“OnPoint”) completed during the three months ended March 31, 2014.
Service revenues for the Sapient Government Services segment (which are derived entirely from the Government, Health & Education industry sector) increased by $20.7 million or 48% in the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 2013, primarily due to an increase in service revenue as a result of the acquisition of OnPoint completed during the three months ended March 31, 2014, and, to a lesser extent, due to an expansion within the existing client base.
Operating Income by Operating Segments
SapientNitro’s operating income increased $7.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013, and increased $32.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. As a percentage of related service revenues, SapientNitro’s operating income increased to 35% in the three months ended September 30, 2014 from 34% in the same period of 2013, while increasing to 33% in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 from 32% in the same period of 2013. Service revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 benefited from the achievement of revenue performance criteria bonuses as mutually agreed to by us and one customer. We may have more opportunities to earn similar performance bonuses in the future.

40


Sapient Global Markets’ operating income decreased $0.8 million and increased $3.4 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2013. As a percentage of related service revenues, Sapient Global Markets’ operating income decreased to 28% and 29% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, compared to 31% in the same periods of 2013. The decrease in operating income as a percentage of service revenues is primarily due to a shift in delivery personnel mix.
Sapient Government Services’ operating income increased $0.7 million in both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the same periods in 2013. As a percentage of related service revenues, Sapient Government Services’ operating income decreased to 25% and 21% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to 31% and 29% for the same periods in 2013. The decrease in operating income as a percentage of related service revenues is primarily due to the OnPoint acquisition completed during the three months ended March 31, 2014.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
September 30,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
 
(in thousands)
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities
$
316,730

 
$
345,588

 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
As Restated
 
(in thousands)
Summary of cash flow activities:
 
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
38,281

 
$
75,452

Net cash used in investing activities
$
(53,798
)
 
$
(30,621
)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
$
(14,212
)
 
$
4,727

We invest our excess cash predominantly in money market funds, time deposits with maturities of 91 days or less, other cash equivalents, and mutual funds.
As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had $1.6 million and $2.1 million, respectively, held with various banks as collateral for letters of credit and performance bonds, and those amounts are classified as “Restricted cash” on our unaudited consolidated and condensed balance sheets.
As of September 30, 2014, our total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and marketable securities balance included $100.3 million held by our U.S. entities and $216.4 million held by our foreign subsidiaries. If we need to access these overseas funds for our operations in the U.S., we would be required to accrue and pay U.S. taxes to repatriate these funds. However, our intent is to reinvest the unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiaries indefinitely, except for $33.8 million of unremitted earnings which as of September 30, 2014 were not reinvested indefinitely, and for which a deferred income tax liability has been recorded. Determination of the potential deferred tax liability on other unremitted earnings is not practicable because such liability, if any, would depend on circumstances existing if and when such remittance occurs. Our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate any overseas funds to fund our U.S. operations.
In July 2012, one of our subsidiaries entered into a revolving credit facility under which it may request advances for general working capital purposes, in U.S. dollars, British pounds sterling and euros, not to exceed an equivalent of $20 million U.S. dollars in the aggregate. On April 29, 2014, we amended the facility primarily to add Sapient Limited, our primary U.K. subsidiary, as an additional borrower. All other terms of the amended facility remained consistent with the original facility. As of November 6, 2014, we had not drawn any advances under this facility. We believe that our existing cash, credit facility and other short-term investments will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements, investing activities, repurchases of common stock, and the expected cash outlays for our previously recorded restructuring activities, for at least the next 12 months.
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 totaled $38.3 million, primarily due to net income of $59.2 million and the addition of $46.8 million in non-cash items, and partially offset by a decrease of $67.7 million in cash relating to changes in operating assets and liabilities. Cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $75.5 million, primarily due to $54.9 million in net income and the addition of $52.4 million in non-cash items, partially

41


offset by a decrease of $31.9 million in cash relating to changes in operating assets and liabilities. The Company's future quarterly cash flows from operations are dependent upon the timing of cash receipts from customers, the seasonality of our annual bonus payments, the achievement of billing milestones for work performed for our customers, and the timing of payments of income and non-income tax liabilities.
Days sales outstanding (“DSO”) is calculated based on the most recent three months of total gross revenues and period end balances of accounts receivable, unbilled revenues and deferred revenues. DSO increased to 73 days as of September 30, 2014 as compared to 63 days as of December 31, 2013. DSO is affected by changes in accounts receivable and unbilled revenues and the timing of achieving certain project milestones and project billings. We expect our unbilled revenues to be short-term in nature, with a majority being billed within 90 days.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 totaled $53.8 million, primarily due to the use of $34.4 million for capital expenditures, mainly for the build out of offices in various locations and costs of internally developed software, the use of $13.0 million, which was primarily related to the $12.8 million cash paid for the acquisition of OnPoint (net of cash acquired), and the use of $5.5 million for the acquisition of a cost method investment. Cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $30.6 million, primarily due to the use of $27.2 million for capital expenditures, mainly for the build out of offices in various locations and costs of internally developed software and the use of $5.0 million for the acquisition of 81% of iThink (net of cash acquired), partially offset by an increase of $3.9 million in restricted cash balances.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 totaled $14.2 million, primarily due to $15.5 million of cash used for repurchases of common stock, and a $5.1 million payment of acquisition date fair value contingent consideration, partially offset by $2.4 million of proceeds from stock option exercises and $4.0 million of tax benefits from exercise and release of stock awards. Cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $4.7 million, primarily due to $2.7 million of proceeds from stock-based option exercises and $2.0 million of excess tax benefits from exercise and release of stock-based awards.
We use foreign currency option contracts to partially mitigate the effects of exchange rate fluctuations on revenues and operating expenses denominated in certain foreign currencies. Please see Part I, Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of our use of such derivative financial instruments.
Contingencies
We are subject to certain legal proceedings and claims incidental to the operations of our business. We are also subject to certain other legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and that have not been fully adjudicated. We currently do not anticipate that these matters, if resolved against us, will have a material adverse impact on our financial results or financial condition.
We accrue for loss contingencies when losses become probable and are reasonably estimable. If the reasonable estimate of the loss is a range and no amount within the range is a better estimate, the minimum amount of the range is recorded as a liability. As of September 30, 2014, we have recorded an accrual of $0.7 million for loss contingencies, which represents the better estimate within the probable range of $0.7 million and $2.4 million, related to all probable losses where a reasonable estimate could be made.
We do not accrue for contingent losses that, in our judgment, are considered to be reasonably possible, but not probable. As of September 30, 2014, we do not have any reasonably possible losses for which an estimate can be made. Although we intend to defend these matters vigorously, the ultimate outcome of our legal matters is uncertain. However, we do not expect the potential losses, if any, to have a material adverse impact on our operating results, cash flows, or financial condition.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For information about recent accounting pronouncements, see Notes to Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements – Note 18, Recent Accounting Pronouncements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
Our cash equivalents and our portfolio of marketable securities are subject to market risk due to changes in interest rates. The market values of fixed rate securities may be adversely impacted due to a rise in market interest rates, while floating rate securities may yield less income than expected if market interest rates fall. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates, and we may suffer losses in principal if we are forced to sell securities that

42


decline in market value due to changes in interest rates. If the interest rate had fluctuated by 10%, the increase or decrease in value of our marketable securities would not have been material as of September 30, 2014 and our interest income would not have changed by a material amount for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2014.
The estimated fair value of our marketable securities portfolio was $6.3 million and $5.9 million as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, which consisted entirely of mutual funds.
Exchange Rate Sensitivity
We face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates because significant portions of our revenues, expenses, assets, and liabilities are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the British pound sterling, the euro, the Indian rupee and the Canadian dollar. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve.
Foreign Currency
Foreign Currency Transaction Exposure
Foreign currency transaction exposure is derived primarily from intercompany transactions of a short-term nature and transactions with clients or vendors in currencies other than the functional currency of the legal entity in which the transaction is recorded. Assets and liabilities arising from such transactions are translated into the legal entity’s functional currency at each reporting period using period-end exchange rates, and any resulting gain or loss as a result of currency fluctuations is recorded in “General and administrative expenses” in our unaudited consolidated and condensed statements of operations of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. 
We mitigate foreign currency transaction exposure by settling these types of transactions in a timely manner where practical, thereby limiting the amount of time that the resulting non-functional currency asset or liability remains outstanding and subject to exchange rate fluctuations.
For additional information regarding our foreign currency transaction exposure, see Note 14, Foreign Currency Exposures and Derivative Instruments, in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1, Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Foreign Currency Translation Exposure
Foreign currency translation exposure is derived from the translation of the financial statements of our subsidiaries for which the functional currency is not the U.S. dollar into U.S. dollars for consolidated reporting purposes. These subsidiaries’ balance sheets are translated into U.S. dollars using period-end exchange rates and their income statements are translated into U.S. dollars using individual transactional exchange rates or average monthly exchange rates. Any difference between the period-end exchange rates and the transactional or average monthly rates is recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” in our consolidated balance sheets.
For the three months ended September 30, 2014, approximately 35% of our revenues and approximately 49% of our operating expenses were generated by subsidiaries for which the functional currency is not the U.S. dollar and thus subject to foreign currency translation exposure, as compared to 21% and 43%, respectively, for the same period in 2013. In addition, 57% of our assets and 38% of our liabilities were subject to foreign currency translation exposure as of September 30, 2014, as compared to 50% of our assets and 40% of our liabilities as of December 31, 2013. We also have assets and liabilities in certain entities that are denominated in currencies other than the entity’s functional currency and are subject to foreign currency transaction exposure, as described above.
Approximately 16% of our operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2014 were incurred by foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency is the Indian rupee. Because we have minimal associated revenues in Indian rupees, any significant movement in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Indian rupee has a significant impact on our operating expenses and operating profit. Approximately 19% and 5% of our service revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014 were generated by foreign subsidiaries whose functional currencies are the British pound sterling, and the euro, respectively. Any significant movements in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the British pound sterling and the U.S. dollar and the Euro, have a significant impact on our service revenues and operating income. We manage these exposures through a risk management program which is designed to mitigate our exposure to operating expenses incurred by foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency is the Indian rupee and operating margins in foreign subsidiaries whose functional currencies are the British pound sterling and the euro. This program includes the use of derivative financial instruments which are not designated as accounting hedges.
For additional information regarding our foreign currency translation exposure, see Note 14, Foreign Currency Exposures and Derivative Instruments, in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1, Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

43


We also performed a sensitivity analysis of the possible losses that could be incurred on these contracts as a result of unfavorable movements in the respective foreign currency exchange rates. The following table presents the maximum losses on these unsettled positions that would result from changes of 10%, 15% and 20% in the underlying average exchange rates of the respective foreign currencies (in thousands):
 
Maximum Losses Resulting from Changes in
Underlying Average Exchange Rates of:
Currency
10%
 
15%
 
20%
Indian rupee
$
892

 
$
1,871

 
$
2,769

British pound sterling
$
721

 
$
1,140

 
$
1,558

Euro
$
138

 
$
221

 
$
304

Open option positions as of September 30, 2014 expire in October, November, and December of 2014 and, therefore, any realized losses in respect to these positions after September 30, 2014 would be recognized in the three months ending December 31, 2014.
For additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk affecting Sapient, see Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management has conducted an evaluation, under the supervision of and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of September 30, 2014. The Company previously reported a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to the accounting for certain tax liabilities resulting from the movement of our employees globally, which was described in Item 9A included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. As a result of this material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which was not remediated as of September 30, 2014, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2014.
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in company reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s CEO and CFO as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Remediation of the Material Weakness
The Company continues to implement remediation steps to address the material weakness discussed above and to improve its internal control over the accounting for certain tax liabilities resulting from the movement of our employees globally. Specifically, with respect to the control deficiency associated with the Company’s previously unrecognized permanent establishments in certain foreign jurisdictions in prior periods, the Company has (i) reorganized the reporting structure of the Company’s global people movement department under one leadership head; (ii) created a cross-functional team, which includes individuals from the global people movement, legal, tax, delivery, project staffing, and finance departments, in order to identify ways to improve the tracking of international workers, assess the impact of regulatory changes in foreign jurisdictions, assess and identify ways to mitigate exposures in new legal jurisdictions, and understand current and future travel patterns of international workers to assess any potential additional exposures; (iii) implemented a new process to review on a regular basis projects staffed with international workers; (iv) enhanced the functionality of our systems to generate reports containing the cumulative number of hours worked by international workers, which are regularly reviewed by cross-functional teams to evaluate permanent establishment exposures; (v) designed and implemented new tools to communicate tax-related mobility considerations to the project staffing department, which will help support the Company’s compliance process; (vi) established a people movement policy for employees working in the United States from other countries; (vii) hired a new Director of Global People Movement; and (viii) refined the design and tested the configuration of its system generated report used to actively monitor and track international workers. In addition to the process improvements noted above, the Company is in the process of: (i) updating its policy for global employees working in countries other than the United States; and (ii) continuing to use experienced external advisors for technical assistance.

44


With respect to the control deficiency associated with the Company not properly reporting, withholding and remitting the appropriate amount of employment-related tax, the Company has (i) engaged and retained experienced external advisors to help advise the Company on technical requirements in each impacted jurisdiction; (ii) hired a Director to focus on enhancing our internal controls in the global people movement process relative to designing and implementing a combination of preventive and detective controls regarding the proper tracking and reporting of taxable employee benefits; (iii) established a people movement policy for employees working in the United States from other countries; and (iv) assigned our newly hired Corporate Controller to oversee internal control over financial reporting remediation efforts. In addition to the process improvements noted above, the Company is in the process of: (i) developing additional new policies, processes and implementing system changes to streamline efforts to gather and report all taxable benefits provided to international workers on long-term assignments; (ii) returning international workers to their home countries as deemed appropriate; and (iii) assessing travel policies to limit the total number of long-term travelers and associated costs.
The Company expects that the measures described above will remediate the material weakness identified and strengthen its internal control over financial reporting. As the Company continues to evaluate and improve its internal control over global people movement, we may identify additional measures to address the material weakness or make modifications to certain of the remediation steps. The Company expects to complete the planned remedial actions during 2014. However, we cannot make any assurances that such actions will be completed during 2014, or that we will successfully remediate this material weakness within the anticipated time frame or cost estimates. If the remediation is not completed or not completed during the anticipated time frame, there can be no assurance that a material misstatement concerning the accounting for certain tax liabilities resulting from the movement of our employees globally will be prevented or detected in a timely manner. We do not believe the costs of these remediation efforts will be material to the financial statements of the Company, either individually or in aggregate.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Except as otherwise discussed above under “Remediation of the Material Weakness,” there were no other changes of our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended September 30, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

45


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are subject to certain legal proceedings and claims incidental to the operation of our business. We are also subject to certain other legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business that have not been fully adjudicated. We currently do not anticipate that these matters, if resolved against us, will have a material adverse impact on our financial results.
For further information regarding our legal proceedings and claims, see Note 7, Commitments and Contingencies, and Note 8, Income Taxes, included in Part I, Item 1, Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the following risk factors, which could materially impact our business and which could cause our actual business, financial condition or future results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or presented elsewhere by management from time to time. The risks described below are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
The announcement and pendency of our acquisition by Publicis could adversely affect our business, financial results and operations.
On November 1, 2014, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Publicis Group S.A., a French société anonyme (“Publicis”), and 1926 Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Publicis (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and upon the terms and subject to the conditions described therein, Publicis will cause Merger Sub to commence a cash tender offer within 10 business days following the date of the Merger Agreement, for all of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Shares”), at a purchase price of $25.00 per Share, net to the seller in cash, without interest, subject to any required withholding of taxes. 
The announcement and pendency of the proposed acquisition could cause disruptions in and create uncertainty surrounding our business, including affecting our relationships with our customers, suppliers and employees, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial results and operations. In particular, we could lose important personnel as a result of the departure of employees who decide to pursue other opportunities in light of the proposed acquisition. We could potentially lose customers or suppliers, or our customers or suppliers could modify their relationships with us in an adverse manner. In addition, we have diverted, and will continue to divert, significant management resources in an effort to complete the acquisition, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We are also subject to certain restrictions contained in the Merger Agreement on the conduct of our business prior to the consummation of the tender offer. These restrictions could result in our inability to respond effectively, and in a timely manner, to competitive pressures, industry developments and future opportunities or may otherwise harm our business, financial results and operations.
The proposed acquisition by Publicis is subject to the receipt of consents and approvals from government entities that may impose conditions that could have an adverse effect on us or could delay or prevent the completion of the acquisition.
Completion of the acquisition by Publicis is conditioned upon, among other things, (i) the expiration or termination of applicable waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the antitrust, competition and trade regulation laws of Germany, (ii) the absence of injunctions or other legal restraints preventing the consummation of the tender offer or the acquisition, (iii) the conclusion or termination of review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States and (iv) certain other regulatory approvals, each as described in the Merger Agreement.
The reviewing authorities may not permit the acquisition at all or may impose restrictions or conditions on the completion of the acquisition. There is no assurance that we will obtain these necessary governmental approvals to complete the acquisition. In addition, any delay in the completion of the acquisition from the failure to obtain such approvals could diminish the anticipated benefits of the acquisition or result in additional transaction costs, loss of revenue or other effects associated with uncertainty about the proposed acquisition.
The failure by Publicis to complete its acquisition of us could adversely affect our business and the market price of our common stock and could result in substantial termination costs.
There is no assurance that completion of the acquisition by Publicis or any other transaction will occur. Consummation of the tender offer is subject to various conditions, including a minimum condition for the valid tender of outstanding Shares, consents or

46


approvals of certain governmental authorities and certain other conditions.
The current market price of our common stock may reflect a market assumption that the tender offer and merger will occur. Failure to complete the tender offer and/or merger could adversely affect the share price of our common stock. We will have incurred significant costs, including the diversion of management resources, for which we will have received little or no benefit if the tender offer and merger are not consummated. The Merger Agreement is subject to termination if the merger is not completed on or before May 1, 2015, or, if on such date all tender offer conditions, other than those relating to anti-trust and other regulatory approvals, shall have been satisfied or waived, the date that is 90 days thereafter. In addition, the Merger Agreement contains certain other termination rights for both us and Publicis and further provides that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, we may be obligated to pay Publicis a termination fee of $125.0 million. A failed transaction may result in negative publicity and a negative impression of us in the investment community. The occurrence of any of these events individually or in combination could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our stock price.
Changes to earnings resulting from past acquisitions may adversely affect our operating results.
Under ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations”, we allocate the total purchase price to an acquired company’s net tangible assets, intangible assets and in-process research and development based on their values as of the date of the acquisition (including certain assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value) and record the excess of the purchase price over those values as goodwill. Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain. After we complete an acquisition, the following factors, among others, could result in material charges that would adversely affect our operating results and may adversely affect our cash flows:

Impairment of goodwill or intangible assets;

A reduction in the useful lives of intangible assets acquired;

Identification of assumed contingent liabilities after we finalize the purchase price allocation period;

Charges to our operating results to eliminate certain pre-merger activities that duplicate those of the acquired company or to reduce our cost structure; or

Charges to our operating results resulting from revised estimates to restructure an acquired company's operations after we finalize the purchase price allocation period.

Routine charges to our operating results associated with acquisitions include amortization of intangible assets, in-process research and development as well as other acquisition related charges, and restructuring. Charges to our operating results in any given period could differ substantially from other periods based on the timing and size of our future acquisitions and the extent of integration activities.
 
We may incur additional costs associated with combining the operations of our acquired companies, which may be substantial. Additional costs may include costs of employee redeployment, relocation and retention, including salary increases or bonuses, and severance payments, reorganization or closure of facilities, taxes, and termination of contracts that provide redundant or conflicting services. These costs would be accounted for as expenses and would decrease our net income and earnings per share for the periods in which those adjustments are made.
Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially impacted by economic conditions and related fluctuations in client demand for marketing, business, technology and other consulting services.
The market for our consulting services and the technologies used in our solutions historically has tended to fluctuate with economic cycles — particularly those cycles in the United States and Europe, where we earn the majority of our revenues. During economic cycles in which many companies are experiencing financial difficulties or uncertainty, clients and potential clients may cancel or delay spending on marketing, technology and other business initiatives. A downturn could result in reduced demand for our services, assignment cancellations or delays, lower revenues and operating margins resulting from price reduction pressures for our services, and payment and collection issues with our clients. Our efforts to down-size, when necessary, in a manner intended to mirror downturned economic conditions could be delayed and costly and could also result in us having inadequate people resources as economic conditions improve. Any of these events could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

47


Our markets are highly competitive and we may not be able to continue to compete effectively.
The markets for the services we provide are highly competitive. We compete principally with large systems consulting and implementation firms, traditional and digital advertising and marketing agencies, offshore consulting and outsourcing companies, and clients’ internal information systems departments. To a lesser extent, other competitors include boutique consulting firms that maintain specialized skills and/or are geographically focused. Regarding our Sapient Government Services business unit, we both compete and partner with large systems integrators, major consulting firms with dedicated government business units, and government contractors. Some of our competitors have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources, and generate greater revenues and have greater name recognition, than we do. Often, these competitors offer a larger and more diversified suite of products and services than we offer. If we cannot keep pace with the intense competition in our marketplace, our business, financial condition and results of operations will suffer.
Our international operations and Global Distributed Delivery (“GDD”) model subject us to increased risk.
We have offices throughout the world. Our international operations account for a significant percentage of our total revenues, and our GDD model is a key component of our ability to deliver our services successfully. Our international operations are subject to inherent risks, including:
economic recessions in foreign countries;
fluctuations in currency exchange rates or impositions of restrictive currency controls;
political instability, war or military conflict;
changes in regulatory requirements;
complexities and costs in effectively managing multi-national operations and associated internal controls and procedures;
significant changes in immigration policies or difficulties in obtaining required immigration approvals for international assignments;
restrictions imposed on the import and export of technologies in countries where we operate;
tightened credit markets in particular geographies;
limitations on our ability to repatriate cash from our foreign subsidiaries;
reduced protection for intellectual property in some countries;
changes and complexities in tax laws; and
complexities and costs associated with adapting our GDD model to ensure compliance with current and evolving regulations, client demands, and employee considerations.
In particular, our GDD model depends heavily on our offices in Gurgaon, Bangalore and Noida, India. Any escalation in the political or military instability in India or Pakistan or the surrounding countries, or a business interruption resulting from a natural disaster, such as an earthquake, could hinder our ability to use our GDD model successfully and could result in material adverse effects to our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, the delivery of our services from remote locations causes us to rely on data, phone, power and other networks which are not as reliable in India as those in other countries where we operate. Any failures of these systems, or any failure of our systems generally, could affect the success of our GDD model. Remote delivery of our services also increases the complexity and risk of delivering our services, which could affect our ability to satisfy our clients’ expectations or perform our services within the estimated time frame and budget for each assignment.
In addition, in many parts of the world, including countries in which we operate and/or seek to expand, practices in the local business community might not conform to international business standards and could violate anticorruption laws, or regulations, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the UK Bribery Act 2010, to which we are subject. Our employees, subcontractors, agents, alliance or joint venture partners and other third parties with which we may associate, could take actions that violate policies or procedures designed to promote legal and regulatory compliance or applicable anticorruption laws or regulations. Violations of these laws or regulations by us, our employees or any of these third parties could subject us to criminal or civil enforcement actions (whether or not we participated in or knew about the actions leading to the violations), including fines or penalties, disgorgement of profits and suspension or disqualification from work, including U.S. federal contracting, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, including our results of operations and our reputation.

48


Also, changes to government structure or policies in countries in which we operate could negatively impact our operations if such changes were to limit or cease any benefits that may currently be available to us. For example, although the Indian government has historically offered generous tax incentives to induce foreign companies to base operations in India, changes in tax laws have been introduced in recent years and may be introduced in the future that may partially offset those benefits. Specifically, in recent years, the income tax incentives applicable to three of our Software Technology Parks units in India expired. In 2009, we established a new India unit in a Special Economic Zone (“SEZ”), which was eligible for a five year, 100% tax holiday, which ended on March 31, 2014. Immediately following the expiration of the 100% tax holiday, the SEZ unit is entitled to a five-year, 50% tax holiday, which ends on March 31, 2019. The expiration of incentives may adversely affect our cost of operations and increase the risk of delivering our services on budget for client assignments. Expiration of tax benefits provided to us by having operations based in India could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, it has become increasingly difficult to obtain necessary visas for certain international personnel, particularly technical personnel, working in our domestic offices, and to receive necessary immigration approvals for our domestic employees working abroad on international assignments. If these challenges continue or increase, it may limit our ability to engage the most desirable personnel for particular assignments, increase the time necessary to receive approvals to do so or prevent us from obtaining such approvals, and increase our costs, all of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially impacted by military actions, global terrorism, natural disasters and political unrest.
Military actions, global terrorism, natural disasters and political unrest are among the factors that may adversely impact regional and global economic conditions and, concomitantly, our client's ability, capacity and need to invest in our services. In addition to the potential impact of any of these events on the business of our clients, these events could pose a threat to our global operations and people. Specifically, our people and operations in India could be impacted if continued civil unrest, terrorism and conflicts with bordering countries in India were to increase significantly. Additionally, hurricanes or other unanticipated catastrophes, both in the U.S. and globally, could disrupt our operations and negatively impact our business as well as disrupt our clients’ businesses, which may result in a further adverse impact on our business. As a result, significant disruptions caused by such events could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we do not attract, hire and retain qualified professional staff, we may be unable to perform adequately our client engagements and could be limited in accepting new client engagements.
Our business is labor intensive, and our success depends upon our ability to attract, hire, retain, train and motivate highly skilled employees to increase our capabilities, support changes in our business operations, and meet client demands in the various geographies in which we operate. The demand for marketing and business and technology consulting services has further increased the need for employees with specialized skills or significant experience in marketing, business and technology consulting, particularly at senior levels and also in India. We have been expanding our operations, and these expansion efforts will be highly dependent on attracting a sufficient number of highly skilled people. We may not be successful in attracting enough employees to achieve our expansion or staffing plans. Industry turnover rates for these types of employees are high, and we may not be successful in retaining, training and motivating the employees we attract. Any inability to attract, hire, retain, train and motivate employees could impair our ability to manage adequately and complete existing assignments and to bid for or accept new client engagements. Such inability may also force us to increase our hiring of expensive independent contractors, which may increase our costs and reduce our profitability on client engagements.
We have invested and will continue to invest substantial managerial and financial resources to monitoring and managing our workforce and other resources. Our future success will depend on our ability to manage the levels and related costs of our workforce and other resources effectively, and we may be unable to do so without substantial expense or other operational challenges, including experiencing a transition period for newly hired employees that results in a temporary drop in our utilization rates or profitability. Further, we may be unable to realize the intended financial, operational and other benefits from our hiring strategy. If we fail to successfully address these risks, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

The success of our business depends in large part on our ability to develop solutions and service offerings that keep pace with the changes in the markets in which we provide our services.

The professional services markets in which we operate are characterized by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards, changing customer preferences and new product and service introductions. Our future success will depend on our ability to develop solutions and service offerings that keep pace with changes in the markets in which we provide services. We cannot be sure that we will be successful in developing new services addressing evolving technologies in a timely or cost-effective manner or, if these services are developed, that we will be successful in offering and deploying them in the marketplace. In addition, we cannot be sure that products, services or technologies developed by others will not render our services non-competitive or obsolete.

49


Our failure to address the demands of the rapidly evolving technological environment could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our ability to remain competitive will also depend on our ability to design and implement, in a timely and cost-effective manner, solutions for clients that both leverage their legacy systems and appropriately utilize newer technologies. Our ability to implement solutions for our clients incorporating new developments and improvements in technology which translate into productivity improvements for our clients and to develop service offerings that meet current and prospective clients' needs are critical to our success.
We earn revenues, incur costs and maintain cash balances in multiple currencies, and currency fluctuations affect our financial results.
We have significant international operations, and we frequently earn our revenues and incur our costs in various foreign currencies. Our international service revenues were $126.0 million and $396.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014. Doing business in these foreign currencies exposes us to foreign currency risks in numerous areas, including revenues and receivables, purchases, payroll and investments on both a transactional level and a financial statement translation basis. As of September 30, 2014, 57% of our assets and 38% of our liabilities were subject to foreign currency translation exposure. We also have a significant amount of foreign currency operating income and net asset exposures. Certain foreign currency exposures, to some extent, are naturally offset within a foreign country, because revenues and costs are denominated in the same foreign currency, and certain cash balances are held in U.S. dollar denominated accounts. However, due to the increasing size and importance of our international operations, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could materially impact our financial results.
Our GDD model also subjects us to increased currency risk because we incur a portion of our assignment costs in Indian rupees and earn revenue from our clients in other currencies. We will continue to experience foreign currency gains and losses in certain instances where it is not possible or cost effective to hedge foreign currencies. There is no guarantee that any currency hedging activity we may undertake will be effective or that our financial condition will not be negatively impacted because our hedging activities are themselves subject to risk. These include risks related to counterparty performance under hedging contracts, risks related to currency exchange rate fluctuations of the Indian rupee or other currencies versus the U.S. dollar, and risks related to the regulatory environment under which we conduct our hedging activities. Costs for our delivery of services, including labor, could increase as a result of the decrease in value of the U.S. dollar against the Indian rupee or other currencies, affecting our reported results.
Our cash positions include amounts denominated in foreign currencies. We manage our worldwide cash requirements considering available funds from our subsidiaries and the cost effectiveness with which these funds can be accessed. The repatriation of cash balances from certain of our subsidiaries outside the United States could have adverse tax consequences and be limited by foreign currency exchange controls. Any fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, or changes in local tax laws, could materially impact the availability and size of these funds for repatriation or transfer.
We have significant fixed operating costs, which may be difficult to adjust in response to unanticipated fluctuations in revenues.
A high percentage of our operating expenses, particularly salary expense, rent, depreciation expense and amortization of purchased intangible assets, are fixed in advance of any particular quarter. As a result, an unanticipated decrease in the number or average size of, or an unanticipated delay in the scheduling for, our assignments may cause significant variations in operating results in any particular quarter and could have a material adverse effect on operations for that quarter.
An unanticipated termination or decrease in size or scope of a major assignment, a client’s decision not to proceed with an assignment we anticipated or the completion during a quarter of several major client assignments could require us to maintain underutilized employees and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our revenues and earnings may also fluctuate from quarter to quarter because of such factors as:
the contractual terms and timing of completion of assignments, including achievement of certain business results;
any delays incurred in connection with assignments;
the adequacy of provisions for losses and bad debts;
the accuracy of our estimates of resources required to complete ongoing assignments;
loss of key highly-skilled personnel necessary to complete assignments; and
general economic conditions.

50


Changes in our effective tax rate or tax liability may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our effective tax rate could be adversely impacted by several factors, some of which are outside our control, including:
changes in relative amounts of income before taxes in the various jurisdictions in which we operate that have differing statutory tax rates;
our ability to accurately value certain assets, including intellectual property;
changes in tax laws and the interpretation of those tax laws;
changes to our assessments about the realizability of our deferred tax assets which are based on estimates of our future results, the prudence and feasibility of possible tax planning strategies and our internal structure, and the economic environment in which we do business;
the cross-border mobility of our employees;
the outcome of future tax audits and examinations; and
changes in generally accepted accounting principles that affect the accounting for taxes.
In the ordinary course of our business, many transactions occur for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. The final determination could be materially different from our historical tax provisions and accruals.
Taxing authorities could challenge our historical and future tax positions related to the allocation of income among our subsidiaries.
We enter into intercompany transactions with affiliated companies located in various tax jurisdictions around the world. Transfer prices for these transactions could be challenged by the various tax authorities resulting in additional tax liabilities, interest, and/or penalties, and the possibility of double taxation. If any of these tax authorities are successful in challenging our tax positions, our income tax expense may be adversely affected.
We may not be able to recognize revenue in the period in which our services are performed, which may contribute to fluctuations in our revenue and margins.
We provide our services under time-and-materials, fixed-price, and retainer contracts. All revenue is recognized pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles. These principles require us to recognize revenue once evidence of an arrangement has been obtained, services are delivered, fees are fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. If we perform our services prior to the period in which we are able to recognize the associated revenue, our revenue and margins may fluctuate from quarter to quarter.
Our profits may decrease and/or we may incur significant unanticipated costs if we do not accurately estimate the costs of fixed-price engagements.
A portion of our service revenues is derived from fixed-price contracts, rather than contracts in which payment to us is determined on a time-and-materials basis. Our failure to estimate accurately the resources and schedule required for an assignment, or our failure to complete our contractual obligations in a manner consistent with the assignment plan upon which our fixed-price contract was based, could adversely affect our overall profitability and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We are consistently entering into contracts for large assignments that magnify this risk. We have been required to commit unanticipated additional resources to complete assignments in the past, which has occasionally resulted in losses on those contracts. We will likely experience similar situations in the future. In addition, we may fix the price for some assignments at an early stage of the assignment engagement, which could result in a fixed price that is too low. Therefore, any changes from our original estimates could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our profitability will be adversely impacted if we are unable to maintain our pricing and utilization rates as well as control our costs.
Our profitability derives from and is impacted by three primary factors: (i) the prices for our services; (ii) our professionals’ utilization or billable time; and (iii) our costs. To achieve our desired level of profitability, our utilization must remain at an appropriate rate, and we must contain our costs. Should we reduce our prices in the future as a result of pricing pressures, or should we be unable to achieve our target utilization rates and costs, our profitability could be adversely impacted.

51


We are dependent on, and may be adversely impacted by, the performance of third parties on certain complex engagements.
Certain complex engagements may require that we partner with specialized software or systems vendors or other partners to perform services. Often in these circumstances, we are liable to our clients for the performance of these third parties. Should the third parties fail to perform timely or satisfactorily, our clients may elect to terminate the engagements or withhold payment until the services have been completed successfully. Additionally, the timing of our revenue recognition may be affected or we may realize lower profits if we incur additional costs due to delays or because we must assign additional personnel to complete the engagement. Furthermore, our relationships with our clients and our reputation generally may suffer harm as a result of these third parties' unsatisfactory performance.
Our clients could unexpectedly terminate their contracts for our services.
Most of our contracts can be canceled by the client with limited advance notice and without significant penalty. A client’s termination of a contract for our services could result in a loss of expected revenues and additional expenses for staff that were allocated to that client’s assignment. We could be required to maintain underutilized employees who were assigned to the terminated contract. The unexpected cancellation or significant reduction in the scope of any of our large assignments, or client termination of one or more recurring revenue contracts could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be liable to our clients for substantial damages caused by our unauthorized disclosures of confidential information, breaches of data security, failure to remedy system failures or other material contract breaches.
We frequently receive or have access to confidential information from our clients, including confidential client data that we use to develop or support solutions. If any person, including one of our employees, misappropriates client confidential information, or if client confidential information is inappropriately disclosed due to a breach of our computer systems, including an attack by computer programmers or hackers who may develop or deploy viruses, worms, or other malicious software programs, system failures or otherwise, we may have substantial liabilities to our clients or their customers. Further, any such compromise to our computer systems could disrupt our operations, as well as our clients’ operations.
Further, many of our assignments involve technology applications or systems that are critical to the operations of our clients’ businesses and handle very large volumes of transactions. If we fail to perform our services correctly, we may be unable to deliver applications or systems to our clients with the promised functionality or within the promised time frame, or to satisfy the required service levels for support and maintenance. Any such failures by us could result in claims for substantial damages by our clients against us.
We may be liable for breaches of confidentiality or data security, defects in the applications or systems we deliver or other material contract breaches that we may commit during the performance of our services (collectively, “Contract Breaches”). In certain circumstances, we agree to unlimited liability for Contract Breaches. Additionally, we cannot be assured that any insurance coverage will be applicable and enforceable in all cases, or sufficient to cover substantial liabilities that we may incur. Further, we cannot be assured that contractual limitations on liability will be applicable and enforceable in all cases. Accordingly, even if our insurance coverage or contractual limitations on liability are found to be applicable and enforceable, our liability to our clients for Contract Breaches could be material in amount and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, such claims may harm our reputation and cause us to lose clients.
Our services may infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties, and create liability for us as well as harm our reputation and client relationships.
The services that we offer to clients may infringe the intellectual property (“IP”) rights of third parties and result in legal claims against our clients and Sapient. These claims may damage our reputation, adversely impact our client relationships and create liability for us. Moreover, we generally agree in our client contracts to indemnify the clients for expenses or liabilities they incur as a result of third party IP infringement claims associated with our services, and the resolution of these claims, irrespective of whether a court determines that our services infringed another party’s IP rights, may be time-consuming, disruptive to our business and extraordinarily costly. Finally, in connection with an IP infringement dispute, we may be required to cease using or developing certain IP that we offer to our clients. These circumstances could adversely impact our ability to generate revenue as well as require us to incur significant expense to develop alternative or modified services for our clients.
We may be unable to protect our proprietary methodology.
Our success depends, in part, upon our proprietary methodology and other IP rights. We rely upon a combination of trade secrets, nondisclosure and other contractual arrangements, and copyright and trademark laws to protect our proprietary rights. We enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, contractors, vendors and clients, and limit access to and distribution of

52


our proprietary information. We cannot be certain that the steps we take in this regard will be adequate to deter misappropriation of our proprietary information or that we will be able to detect unauthorized use and take appropriate steps to enforce our IP rights.
Our stock price is volatile and may result in substantial losses for investors.
The trading price of our common stock has been subject to wide fluctuations at various times in the past. Our trading price could continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to:
quarterly variations in operating results and achievement of key business metrics by us or our competitors;
changes in operating results estimates by securities analysts;
any differences between our reported results and securities analysts’ published or unpublished expectations;
announcements of new contracts or service offerings made by us or our competitors;
announcements of acquisitions or joint ventures made by us or our competitors; and
general economic or stock market conditions.
In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. The commencement of this type of litigation against us in the future could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.
Certain of our directors have significant voting power and may effectively control the outcome of any stockholder vote.
Jerry A. Greenberg, current Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors and former Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and J. Stuart Moore, former Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors and Co-Chief Executive Officer and current member of our Board of Directors, hold, in the aggregate, approximately 11% of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of November 3, 2014. As a result, they have the ability to substantially influence and, in some cases, may affect the outcome of corporate actions requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors. This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of Sapient, even if such a change in control would benefit other investors. Affiliates of Messrs. Greenberg and Moore own substantial holdings not represented by this percentage over which Messrs. Greenberg and Moore disclaim beneficial ownership.
We are dependent on our key employees.
Our success depends in large part upon the continued services of a number of key employees. Our employment arrangements with key personnel provide that employment is terminable at will by either party. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if our key employees resign from Sapient to join a competitor or to form a competing company, the loss of such personnel and any resulting loss of existing or potential clients or employees to any such competitor could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot be certain that any agreements we require our employees to enter into will be effective in preventing them from engaging in these actions or that courts or other adjudicative entities will substantially enforce these agreements.
We may be unable to achieve anticipated benefits from acquisitions.
The anticipated benefits from any acquisitions that we have undertaken in the past or may undertake might not be achieved. For example, if we acquire a company, we cannot be certain that clients of the acquired business will continue to conduct business with us, or that employees of the acquired business will continue their employment or integrate successfully into our operations and culture. The identification, consummation and integration of acquisitions require substantial attention from management. The diversion of management’s attention, as well as any difficulties encountered in the integration process, could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, we may incur significant expenses in completing any such acquisitions, and we may assume significant liabilities, some of which may be unknown at the time of the acquisition.
The failure to successfully and timely implement certain financial system changes to improve operating efficiency and enhance our reporting controls could harm our business.
We have implemented and continue to install several upgrades and enhancements to our financial systems. We expect these initiatives to enable us to achieve greater operating and financial reporting efficiencies and also enhance our existing control environment through increased levels of automation of certain processes. Failure to successfully execute these initiatives in a timely, effective and efficient manner could result in the disruption of our operations, the inability to comply with our obligations

53


under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, significant deficiencies or a material weakness, and/or the inability to report our financial results in a timely and accurate manner.

The restatement of our consolidated financial statements and possible related events, should they occur, may negatively impact our stock price, and may consume time and resources.
 
As discussed in Note 21, Restatement, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of the our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, we have restated our consolidated financial statements on Form 10-K for certain prior periods to correct certain errors in those financial statements. The previously disclosed errors related to our unrecorded corporate income and employment tax liabilities in connection with the movement of employees globally.
 
As with all corporate controls, we cannot be certain that the measures we have taken, and are taking, to remedy the errors since they were discovered will ensure that no errors occur in the future. The cost of remediation could result in substantial expense and a diversion of time and resources. Further, the costs and expenses related to our remediation efforts may affect our financial condition and operating results and may negatively impact our stock price.
 
Although we have now completed the restatement, we cannot guarantee that we will not receive regulatory inquiries or be subject to litigation regarding our restated financial statements or matters relating thereto. Were any such future regulatory inquiries or litigation to occur, regardless of the outcome, such actions would likely consume internal resources and result in additional legal and consulting costs and could negatively impact our stock price.

We cannot assure investors that we will be able to fully or timely address the material weakness in our internal controls that led to the restatement, or that the remediation efforts will prevent future material weakness. 

As a result of our review of issues related to the restatement described in Note 17, Restatement, in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1, Unaudited Consolidated and Condensed Financial Statements, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, management has identified deficiencies in our control environment that constitute a material weakness and, consequently, has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective at December 31, 2013. In addition, management has concluded, based primarily on the identification of the material weakness, that our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2013 as a result of the material weakness in internal controls related to accounting for certain tax liabilities resulting from the movement of our employees globally. See Item 9A, Controls and Procedures, in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. If we are unable to successfully remediate this material weakness and to do so in a timely manner, investors may lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could lead to a decline in our stock price, limit our ability to access the capital markets in the future, and require us to incur additional costs to improve our internal control systems and procedures.
We cannot assure investors that we will not discover other material weaknesses in the future or that no material weakness will result from any difficulties, errors, delays or disruptions while we implement controls to remediate such material weakness.


54


Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table includes information with respect to repurchases we made of our common stock pursuant to our stock repurchase program during the three months ended September 30, 2014:
 
Period
Total number
of shares
purchased
 
Average price paid per share
 
Total number of
shares purchased
as part of
publicly
announced
plans or programs (1)
 
Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
July 1, 2014 to July 31, 2014
221,600
 
$15.55
 
221,600
 
$142,634
August 1, 2014 to August 31, 2014
253,100
  
$14.42
  
253,100
  
$138,984
September 1, 2014 to September 30, 2014
278,173
  
$14.42
  
278,173
  
$134,972
Total
752,873
  
$14.75
  
752,873
  
$134,972

(1) On May 13, 2014, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $150 million of our common stock (the “2014 Repurchase Program”). Under the 2014 Repurchase Program, management is authorized to repurchase shares through Rule 10b5-1 plans, open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, block purchases or otherwise in accordance with applicable federal securities laws, including Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act. The 2014 Repurchase Program will expire upon the earlier of the date on which the program is terminated by the Board of Directors or when all authorized repurchases are completed. The Company made additional purchases under the 2014 Repurchase Program between October 1, 2014 and October 31, 2014. However, the Company does not intend to make further repurchases under the 2014 Repurchase Program.

55


Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
 
Description
 
 
 
31.1*
 
Certification of Alan J. Herrick pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
31.2*
 
Certification of Joseph S. Tibbetts, Jr. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
32.1**
 
Certification of Alan J. Herrick pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
32.2**
 
Certification of Joseph S. Tibbetts, Jr. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
101.INS*
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
101.SCH*
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
 
 
 
101.CAL*
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
 
 
 
101.DEF*
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
 
 
 
101.LAB*
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
 
 
 
101.PRE*
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
*
 
Exhibits filed herewith.
**
 
Exhibits furnished herewith.

56


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SAPIENT CORPORATION 
 
 
 
 
 
Signature
  
Title
 
Date
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Alan J. Herrick
  
Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
November 6, 2014
Alan J. Herrick
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Joseph S. Tibbetts, Jr.
  
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
November 6, 2014
Joseph S. Tibbetts, Jr.
 
 

57