Attached files

file filename
8-K - 8-K - American Residential Properties, Inc.november2014presentation_8k.htm
AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC. COMPANY UPDATE NAREIT CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 2014


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 DISCLAIMER AND CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS The information in this presentation has been prepared solely for informational purposes and does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase any securities. Some of the statements in this presentation constitute forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included in this presentation reflect American Residential Properties, Inc.’s (“ARPI’s”) current views about future events and are subject to numerous known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and changes in circumstances that may cause ARPI’s actual results to differ significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. Statements regarding the following subjects, among others, may be forward-looking: ARPI’s ability to effectively deploy its capital; ARPI’s business and investment strategy; ARPI’s projected operating results; economic, demographic or real estate developments in ARPI’s markets; home value appreciation, employment growth, residential building permits, median household income and household formation in ARPI’s markets; defaults on, early terminations of or non-renewal of leases by ARPI’s tenants; ARPI’s ability to identify properties to acquire and to complete acquisitions; increased time and/or expense to gain possession and restore properties; ARPI’s ability to successfully operate acquired properties; projected operating costs; rental rates or vacancy rates; ARPI’s ability to obtain financing arrangements; general volatility of the markets in which ARPI participates; ARPI’s expected investments; interest rates and the market value of ARPI’s target assets; impact of changes in governmental regulations, tax law and rates and similar matters; ARPI’s ability to qualify and maintain ARPI’s qualification as a REIT; availability of qualified personnel; estimates relating to ARPI’s ability to make distributions to ARPI’s stockholders in the future; ARPI’s understanding of ARPI’s competition; and market trends in ARPI’s industry, real estate values, the debt securities markets or the general economy. The forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, assumptions and expectations of ARPI as to future events, taking into account all information currently available to ARPI. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future events or of ARPI’s performance. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to ARPI. If a change occurs, ARPI’s business, financial condition, liquidity, cash flows and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made. New risks and uncertainties arise over time, and it is not possible for ARPI to predict the occurrence of those matters or the manner in which they may affect ARPI. ARPI is not obligated to, and does not intend to, update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this presentation, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. 2


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 WHO IS AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.? An Experienced, Internally Managed Single-Family Rental Company with a National Footprint (1) Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan, Citibank, BAML, Morgan Stanley, Key Bank, Barclay’s, Raymond James and Comerica. Public Company • NYSE Listed Company (Ticker: ARPI) Experience & Proven Track Record • Founders have over six years of proven single-family rental operating experience, starting with own capital • Extensive history as real estate investment managers as well as expertise with public capital markets and securitization processes Centralized Operating Platform • Fully internalized operating and property management platform since inception • Regional and local leasing and property management infrastructure Resident-Centric Operating Strategy • Resident-centric operating philosophy designed to maximize revenue and resident retention with 24/7 service Diversified, High-Quality Portfolio • As of September 30, 2014: − Own and manage over $1.2B of assets − Portfolio of 8,223 homes in 38 MSAs in 13 states − Stabilized portfolio occupancy of 93% Proven Access to Institutional Capital • Raised over of $1.6B of debt and institutional capital without reliance on private equity Broad-based Banking Support • Nine major financial institutions in $500MM corporate credit facility (with $750MM accordion) providing exceptional financial flexibility(1) Internally Managed & Experienced Independent Directors • Internally managed with clear shareholder and management alignment • Independent members of Board of Directors have extensive public company experience 4


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 WHAT IS OUR STRATEGY? An Experienced, Internally Managed Single-Family Rental Company with a National Footprint A company with leadership, experience & a fully integrated operating platform – well-positioned to expand its portfolio and operations Disciplined Acquisition Strategy • Focus on markets with robust job growth, population in-migration and dynamic underlying economic fundamentals • Seek strong rental demand with potential for significant rent growth and home price appreciation • Capitalize on all sourcing channels (MLS, portfolio and auction) • Target newer homes with 3 to 4 bedrooms in good school districts within family-oriented communities Scale & Operational Efficiencies • National purchasing programs with major suppliers including Pittsburgh Paints, The Home Depot and Sears • In-house property inspectors, leasing teams and maintenance technicians Research & Technology • Utilize advanced geocoding technology to analyze variables on a street-by-street basis • Proprietary Enterprise Management System software developed to manage workflow and capture data from acquisition to restoration, leasing life-cycles, re-tenancy and routine maintenance • Electronic access to properties as well as mobile application integration for vendors and leasing agents Supply & Demand Fundamentals • Declining homeownership rate (64.4%(1)) and growing preference to rent among millennials • Tighter mortgage underwriting standards, inability to fund down payment and credit challenges • Looming housing shortage due to lack of builder activity (2008-2013) Benefits Relative to Multi-Family • Larger living spaces at lower rents ($0.67 PSF for ARPI portfolio) • Lower turnover (29% vs 54%(2)) and longer resident tenure • Similar occupancy rates on a stabilized basis with substantial rent growth potential Extraordinary Opportunity • Tremendous asset base - 14.8MM single-family rental homes totaling $2.7 trillion(3) • Fragmented cottage industry with operating inefficiencies and lack of professional management (1) U.S. Census Bureau, October 2014 (2) National Apartment Association, 2013 Survey of Operating Income & Expenses in Rental Apartment Communities (3) John Burns Real Estate Consulting, LLC, U.S Housing Forecast & Analysis, October 2014 5


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 WHAT IS ARPI’S VALUE PROPOSITION? Four Key Strengths 6  1. Asset Value: Single family homes (when well-selected and in key markets) typically show historic value increases and are a great inflation hedge. Houses are the most liquid of all real estate.  2. Cash Flow (FFO): As properties stabilize and we experience lease-up and expense reduction, cash flow will be significant.  3. Cash Flow (FFO) Growth: As we increase rents annually, flow through to net yield is 100%. Rental demand for quality single family homes remains strong.  4. Experienced Management: The ARPI Management Team has the experience and track record to ensure that the three advantages above are realized.


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 AN EXPERIENCED OPERATING COMPANY 7


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 HOW DID WE BUILD THE COMPANY?  One of first to raise institutional equity dedicated to SFR opportunity  First to obtain structured credit facility for SFR from national commercial bank (Wells Fargo)  Internalized operating & property management platform  Raised $371MM of equity in two Rule 144A offerings to institutional investors  Expanded operations into ten states  Raised $287MM of equity through IPO & expanded into 13 states  Secured $380MM credit facility with accordion up to $500MM  Established national purchasing programs  Issued $115MM of five-year convertible notes  Co-founders’ experience running businesses that relied on scaled operational efficiencies  Extensive understanding of financing, capital markets & institutional equity Systematic & Disciplined Evolution of a SFR Pioneer 2010 2013 2012 Pre-2008 It is not what we will do…it is what we have been doing for the past six years Formed Phoenix Fund I Formed ARPI ARPI IPO  Recognized unique opportunity  Invested own capital to develop institutional standards, acquisition & operating platform  Began acquiring, restoring & operating SFR homes 2008 Founded ARP LLC  Expanded regional infrastructure  Opened internal leasing office in Phoenix  Expanded credit facility to $500MM with accordion up to $750MM  Completed $342MM securitization transaction 2014 First Full Year on NYSE 8


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 WHO RUNS & OVERSEES THE COMPANY? Experienced Senior Management & Independent Directors Experienced Senior Management Team Real Estate Experience Stephen Schmitz Laurie Hawkes Shant Koumriqian Lani Porter Jay Byce Patricia Dietz Chairman & CEO Co-Founder Director, President & COO Co-Founder CFO SVP of Operations SVP of Investments General Counsel & CCO > 30 years > 30 years 19 years 19 years > 15 years 15 years Relevant Prior Experience • CIO of Franchise Finance Corporation of America (NYSE: FFA) • President & Partner at U.S. Realty Advisors, a $3 B Private RE Firm • Managing Director at CS First Boston & Salomon Brothers specializing in Real Estate & Mortgage Investment Banking • CFO of MPG Office Trust (NYSE: MPG) • Senior level management and audit positions at Arthur Andersen & Deloitte • COO at nCommand, developed virtual loan process for mortgages • Director of Operations at Hometown Mortgage • CFO & VP of Operations at Accruent • Managing Director at Colony American Homes, LLC, with responsibility for acquiring over 6000 homes • VP at Regions Bank • Senior Counsel, Vice President & Assistant Secretary at GE Capital, Franchise Finance • Vice President of Legal Services at Fidelity National Information Services Independent Directors Public Company Experience Douglas Benham David Brain Keith Guericke Todd Mansfield 10 years 15 years > 20 years 20 years Relevant Experience • Former CEO of Arby’s Inc. • Former Director of Sonic Corp. (NASDAQ: SONC) & O’Charley’s, Inc. (NASDAQ: CHUX) • President & CEO, EPR Properties (NYSE: EPR) • Former CEO & current Director & Vice Chairman, Essex Property Trust (NYSE: ESS) • President & CEO, Crescent Communities, LLC • Former EVP at The Walt Disney Company (NYSE: DIS) 9 Clear alignment between ARPI management and shareholders


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 WHAT IS OUR ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE?  Market Evaluation  Sourcing Management  Underwriting  Pricing  Closing  Utilize network of over 220 external agents nationwide ACQUISITIONS & SOURCING  Property Management − Renovations, Re-tenancy & Maintenance − HOA Relations − Utilities Administration  National Purchasing Programs  National Quality Assurance  Resident Services Call Center  Deep bench of over 200 qualified & certified external contractors OPERATIONS  Branding & Market Awareness  Leasing  Resident Underwriting & Application Approval  Social Media & Local Marketing Campaigns  Resident Retention Program  Experienced network of 43 external regional leasing agents nationwide MARKETING, LEASING, & RESIDENT RELATIONS  Capital Raising & Financing  Accounting & Tax Management  Rent Collection  Revenue Max Programs  Vendor & Contractor Payments  HOA, Tax & Utilities Payments  SOX Compliance  Risk Management FINANCE & ACCOUNTING CA AZ NV TX IL IN FL GA NC  Acquisition, Inspection and Leasing Specialists in Regional Offices  National, Regional and Local Suppliers & Vendors  “Feet-on-the-Street” External Leasing Agents with Internal Leasing Offices in Phoenix, Atlanta & North Carolina  National Quality Assurance Inspectors REGIONAL & LOCAL OPERATIONS North Central Southeast ARPI CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS (PHOENIX, AZ) South Central A Vertically Integrated Platform Designed for Scale & Operating Efficiencies SC Southwest CO TN OH 10  Enterprise Technology System (SPINE EMS)  Database Management  Market & Rental Data  Performance Measurement & Management Reporting  Research Library INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DATA SYSTEMS


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 WHERE DO WE OWN PROPERTIES? Homes Owned 8,223 States 13 Average Age 18 years Average Size 1,802 sq. ft. Average Investment $144,151 Average Monthly Rent(2) $1,236 Total Occupancy 81.6% Stabilized Occupancy(3) 93.4% Markets with Job & Population Growth with Strong Rent & Home Price Appreciation Portfolio Overview(1) ARPI Corporate Headquarters Regional Office ARPI Market Phoenix, AZ 17% Houston, TX 13% Dallas-Fort Worth, TX 12% Atlanta, GA 9% Nashville, TN 8% Indianapolis, IN 7% Chicago, IL 6% Charlotte, NC 4% Winston-Salem, NC 3% Inland Empire, CA 3% All Other Markets 18% Portfolio Distribution(4) (1) As of September 30, 2014 (2) Average monthly rent for self-managed properties (3) Properties are considered stabilized when renovations have been completed and the properties have been leased or available for rent for a period of greater than 90 days. Properties with in-place leases at the date of acquisition are also considered stabilized even though these properties have not been renovated by us and may require future renovations to meet our standards. (4) By number of homes owned as of September 30, 2014 11


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 HOW DO WE SELECT MARKETS? Our market strategy balances strong economic fundamentals, rent growth, HPA potential & discount to replacement cost to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns AVERAGE ANNUAL EMPLOYMENT GROWTH(1) (2014-2018) 2.2% 2.9% 3.0% 2.1% 2.4% 2.6% 1.9% 2.7% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% Phoenix Houston Dallas Atlanta Nashville Charlotte Tampa Orlando National: 1.5% AVERAGE ANNUAL POPULATION GROWTH(1) (2014-2018) 2.3% 1.8% 2.1% 1.7% 0.8% 2.3% 1.1% 2.7% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% Phoenix Houston Dallas Atlanta Nashville Charlotte Tampa Orlando National: 0.8% AVERAGE ANNUAL RENT PER LEASED HOME AS % OF AVERAGE INVESTMENT PER LEASED HOME(2) PROJECTED HOME VALUE APPRECIATION(4) (2014-2018) 8.6% 11.3% 10.8% 10.6% 9.9% 10.8% 9.5% 9.4% 9.5% 0% 4% 8% 12% Phoenix Houston Dallas Atlanta Nashville Other Charlotte Tampa Orlando Portfolio Wide: 10.2% 16.6% 15.7% 18.8% 30.6% 20.4% 17.8% 21.0% 22.6% 0% 4% 8% 12% 16% 20% 24% 28% 32% Phoenix Houston Dallas Atlanta Nashville Charlotte Tampa Orlando National: 16.6% (3) (1) Represents 2014 to 2018 projections per John Burns Real Estate Consulting estimates (October 2014). Annual averages represent 4-year compound annual growth rate from 2014-2018, measured from actual 2013 base. Actual values may differ materially from estimates. (2) Relates to ARPI’s portfolio of self-managed homes. Represents annualized average monthly rent per leased home as a percentage of our average investment (average purchase price per home plus average capital expenditures) per leased home. Does not include a provision for payment of ongoing property expenses (such as insurance, taxes, HOA fees and maintenance) or an allocation of our general and administrative expense, all of which materially impact ARPI’s results. Data as of September 30, 2014. (3) Includes all other MSAs nationwide that are not otherwise listed on this chart in which ARPI owns self-managed properties as of September 30, 2014. (4) Represents 2014 to 2018 projections per John Burns Real Estate Consulting’s Burns Home Value Index (October2014). Actual values may differ materially from those estimated. Focus on Markets with Strong Macro- and Micro-Economic Fundamentals 12


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 HOW DO WE ACQUIRE PROPERTIES? Disciplined Acquisition Platform Utilizing Market Knowledge and Technology  School scores / educational attainment levels  Low crime index  Attractive rental fundamentals / family-friendliness metrics  Proximity to lifestyle amenities  Driving distance to employment centers  Access to major transportation routes  Low 3 & 4 bedroom single-family vacancy rates / rental saturation CRITICAL SUBMARKET CHARACTERISTICS  Analyze submarket rental supply / demand fundamentals  Rents/ acquisition yields / above average median income levels  3 & 4 bedroom, detached, entry-level homes  Generally post-1990 construction  Light-to-moderate restoration needs (typically 5% to 15% of purchase price)  Avoid FEMA Special Flood Hazard Areas DISCIPLINED ACQUISITION CRITERIA CUMULATIVE ACQUISITION VOLUME AND CHANNEL TYPE (Q2 2012 – Q3 2014) CUMULATIVE ACQUISITIONS BY CHANNEL TYPE (JUNE 2012 – SEPTEMBER 2014) MLS 44% Auction 11% Portfolio 45% 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014 Q2 2014 Q3 2014 Cumulative Portfolio Acquisitions Cumulative Auction Acquisitions Cumulative MLS Acquisitions 70 729 1,775 2,531 4,089 5,440 6,073 6,762 7,205 8,223 13


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 HOW DO WE COMPARE TO REPLACEMENT COST? We Seek Significant Discounts to Replacement Cost (1) Percentage figures on chart represent the average difference between the estimated replacement cost per square foot in the market and ARPI’s total investment per square foot in that market as of September 30, 2014. Assumes “Average” construction quality as defined by RS Means, a division of Reed Construction Data. 14 $0.00 $20.00 $40.00 $60.00 $80.00 $100.00 $120.00 $140.00 REPLACEMENT COST BY MARKET(1) (SELF-MANAGED PORTFOLIO) RS Means 2014 Replacement Cost per Square Foot ARPI Investment per Square Foot 23% 31% 29% 29% 19% 14% 20% 24% 45% 27% 54% 47% 33% 31%


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 HOW DO WE RESTORE & MAINTAIN PROPERTIES? • Electronic access management • Project evaluation, pricing & project management via mobile applications • Restoration costs average between 5% to 15% of purchase price • Vendor qualifications & quality assurance programs • In-house 24/7 Resident Services Center • Expansion of national purchasing programs Building on our experience, we are adhering to a uniform approach to restoration & maintenance across geographic markets RESTORATION & MAINTENANCE 15 Focus on Cost Effectiveness, Expediency, and Quality Control


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 COMMUNICATIONS • Resident Orientation Manual for Home Operation & Maintenance • Surveys for New Move-in, Maintenance Request Follow-up & Move-out • Monthly “Welcome Home” Resident newsletter • Broker Communications Blast (social media invitations, weekly “Hot List” blasts) SOCIAL MEDIA • Regular posts/updates on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest & YouTube • Quarterly Social Media Resident Contests • Designing Spaces TV Segments on Lifetime Network • Holiday contests and promotions RESIDENT PROMOTIONS • Resident Gift Bags • Custom ARPI Door Mats & Key Fobs Broker e-blast of “Hot List” properties ADVERTISING • Zillow • Multiple Listing Service • Trulia • “For Rent” Yard Signs • Rentals.com WHAT IS OUR MARKETING & BRANDING STRATEGY? Resident Retention is Key to Revenue and Shareholder Value • ARPI website • Craigslist • Hot Pads • Weekly “Hot List: email blast to external brokers in each MSA 16


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097  Average tenure at current job is six years  Typically two-income household  Average head of household is in late 30s  Average of two children per household  Rental rate as percentage of household income approximately 19% SAMPLE PROFILE OF ARPI RESIDENTS (1) The averages/ratios are based on information derived from only that portion of leases in ARP’s portfolio entered into between approximately May 2013 to September 30, 2014 and does not reflect any lease entered into prior to such date or any lease of a property where such property was acquired by ARPI in a portfolio acquisition. (2) Figures include only leases underwritten by ARPI. These figures do not reflect inherited leases where there is a tenant in place at time of acquisition. (3) State Median Household income based on U.S. Census 2013 American Community Survey (4) Excludes Colorado (< 5 properties). SAMPLE RESIDENT PROFILE(1) Average Resident is part of a two-income household with stable income Region Southwest South- Central(4) Midwest Southeast Sample Resident Profile Statistics(1) AZ CA NV TX IN OH TN NC SC GA FL TOTAL Average Rental Rate $1,044 $1,314 $1,034 $1,440 $836 $1,430 $1,383 $1,164 $1,093 $1,163 $1,075 $1,236 Average Rental Price/SF $0.61 $0.75 $0.67 $0.72 $0.62 $0.78 $0.73 $0.69 $0.73 $0.57 $0.63 $0.67 Average ARPI Household Income (2) $63,996 $68,958 $59,304 $87,553 $44,264 $89,849 $90,465 $71,225 $54,743 $69,266 $56,218 $76,765 State Median Household Income(3) $57,163 $68,222 $59,462 $61,208 $59,428 $61,030 $54,691 $56,111 $54,686 $57,458 $55,774 $51,939 Ratio of ARPI Household Income to State Median Household Income(2) 1.12 1.01 1.00 1.43 0.74 1.47 1.65 1.27 1.00 1.21 1.01 1.48 Average ARPI Income to Rent Ratio(2) 5.15 4.37 4.78 5.07 4.48 5.24 5.55 5.10 4.17 5.18 4.35 5.23 Average ARPI Rent to Income Ratio(2) 19.4% 22.9% 20.9% 19.7% 22.3% 19.1% 18.0% 19.6% 24.0% 19.3% 22.9% 19.1% Average Renewal Rent Increase 2.97% 3.60% 3.99% 4.09% 2.02% 4.00% 2.99% 2.70% 4.41% 2.21% 6.48% 3.43% 17


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 WHAT IS OUR CAPITAL STRUCTURE?  Growth-Oriented Capital Structure  Adequate liquidity to finance external growth (1) Based on 33.2 million shares, including RSUs, OP units, LTIP units (vested and unvested) and a $18.69 closing price on November 3, 2014 (2) As of September 30, 2014 (3) Availability under $500 million credit facility is subject to borrowing base limitations which may limit ARPI’s ability to fully draw on this facility (does not include the accordion feature up to $750 million) 18 Equity Market Capitalization(1) $ 621 Outstanding Under Credit Facility $ 199 Exchangeable Senior Notes(3) $ 115 Asset-Backed Securitization $ 342 Total Capitalization $ 1,277 Debt / Total Capitalization 51% SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 CAPITALIZATION ($MM) SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 LIQUIDITY ($MM) Cash and Cash Equivalents(2) $ 27 Undrawn Credit Facility(3) $ 301 Total Liquidity $ 328 Demonstrated Experience with Long Track Record of Raising Equity & Debt Capital


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 THE OPPORTUNITY & FUTURE GROWTH 19


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 WHAT ARE THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR FUTURE GROWTH? Robust Investment Pipeline, Growing Rental Demand & Potential Housing Shortage • Foreclosure inventory- Over 4 MM non-performing mortgages (1) • Consolidation - Sub-scale SFR operators with limited capital access • Existing SFR market - 35% of total rental market (~$2.7 trillion)(1) ROBUST SUPPLY PIPELINE • Financial crisis- Housing crash created 6 MM+ potential rental households • Credit challenges -Families unable to afford down payment or obtain mortgage financing • Millennials –Prefer flexibility of renting for job mobility and maintenance services • Housing Shortage – New inventory (2008-2013) has not kept pace with population growth SOLID AND INCREASING DEMAND (1) John Burns Real Estate Consulting, LLC, October 2014. 65% 23% 12% Type Homes (millions) Total 133.2 Owner Occupied 77.1 Multi-Family Rental 27.3 Single-Family Rental 14.8 Vacant 14.0 Owner Occupied Multi-Family Rental OCCUPIED HOMES(1) SFR ~$2.7 trillion LONG-ESTABLISHED COMPONENT OF U.S. HOUSING MARKET • 1 in 8 occupied single-family homes are rentals (1) • ~35% of the total rental market is SFR (~$2.7 trillion) • Opportunity may dwarf multi-family public REIT market • Highly fragmented ownership • “Mom & pop” and regional owners / operators 20


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 WHAT ARE THE CURRENT LEVELS OF HOME PRICES AND RENTAL VACANCIES? (1) Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices, LLC (2) Source: RentRange, LLC Nationally, home prices are still at a 9% discount to the long-term trend, while in many major markets, rental vacancies continue to decline 21 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Ju n -1 9 8 7 D ec -1 9 8 7 Ju n -1 9 8 8 D ec -1 9 8 8 Ju n -1 9 8 9 D ec -1 9 8 9 Ju n -1 9 9 0 D ec -1 9 9 0 Ju n -1 9 9 1 D ec -1 9 9 1 Ju n -1 9 9 2 D ec -1 9 9 2 Ju n -1 9 9 3 D ec -1 9 9 3 Ju n -1 9 9 4 D ec -1 9 9 4 Ju n -1 9 9 5 D ec -1 9 9 5 Ju n -1 9 9 6 D ec -1 9 9 6 Ju n -1 9 9 7 D ec -1 9 9 7 Ju n -1 9 9 8 D ec -1 9 9 8 Ju n -1 9 9 9 D ec -1 9 9 9 Ju n -2 0 0 0 D ec -2 0 0 0 Ju n -2 0 0 1 D ec -2 0 0 1 Ju n -2 0 0 2 D ec -2 0 0 2 Ju n -2 0 0 3 D ec -2 0 0 3 Ju n -2 0 0 4 D ec -2 0 0 4 Ju n -2 0 0 5 D ec -2 0 0 5 Ju n -2 0 0 6 D ec -2 0 0 6 Ju n -2 0 0 7 D ec -2 0 0 7 Ju n -2 0 0 8 D ec -2 0 0 8 Ju n -2 0 0 9 D ec -2 0 0 9 Ju n -2 0 1 0 D ec -2 0 1 0 Ju n -2 0 1 1 D ec -2 0 1 1 Ju n -2 0 1 2 D ec -2 0 1 2 Ju n -2 0 1 3 D ec -2 0 1 3 Ju n -2 0 1 4 S&P/CASE-SHILLER U.S. NATIONAL HOME PRICE INDEX (1987-2014) S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index June 1987 - June 2014 Trend 9% Discount to Trend 7.27% 6.34% 6.00% 6.20% 6.40% 6.60% 6.80% 7.00% 7.20% 7.40% Sep-10 Dec-10 Mar-11 Jun-11 Sep-11 Dec-11 Mar-12 Jun-12 Sep-12 Dec-12 Mar-13 Jun-13 Sep-13 Dec-13 Mar-14 Jun-14 Sep-14 VACANCY RATE FOR 3- AND 4- BEDROOM SINGLE-FAMILY RENTAL HOMES IN THE PHOENIX-MESA-SCOTTSDALE MSA


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 HOW DOES THE SIZE OF SFR OWNERS COMPARE WITH THE MULTIFAMILY MARKET? Top 50 Apartment Owners & Top 5 Single-Family Rental Owners Sources: National Multifamily Housing Council; Keefe, Bruyette & Woods; AMH, ARPI & SWAY 2013 Annual Reports 22 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 Starwood ARPI Colony American BRE Properties, Inc. Milestone Management, L.P. American Homes 4 Rent Morgan Properties Highridge Costa Investors, LLC AEW Capital Management, L.P. Harbor Group International Concord Management Limited Berkshire Property Advisors Sentinel Real Estate Corporation Essex Property Trust, Inc. Holiday Retirement Corp. Colonial Properties Trust Westdale Real Estate Heitman LLC Weidner Apartment Homes BH Equities LLC Balfour Beatty Communities UBS Realty Investors LLC J.P. Morgan Asset Management Invitation Homes Home Properties, Inc. DRA Advisors LLC The Michaels Organization Raymond James Tax Credit Funds Lincoln Property Company Irvine Company Invesco Real Estate Bell Partners Inc. Forest City Residential Group, Inc. The Related Companies TIAA-CREF JRK Property Holdings, Inc. WNC & Associates, Inc. MAA Pinnacle Family of Companies UDR, Inc. Edward Rose & Sons Alliant Capital, Ltd. Archstone AvalonBay Communities, Inc. Camden Property Trust Aimco Enterprise The Richman Group Equity Residential PNC Real Estate Boston Financial SunAmerica Centerline Capital Group Hunt Companies, Inc Boston Capital Number of Units


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC. ________________________________________________ Note: Properties pictured throughout the presentation are sample properties included in the ARPI’s portfolio, but not necessarily representative of all properties in the portfolio. RALEIGH, NC DALLAS, TX PHOENIX, AZ NASHVILLE, TN CORPUS CHRISTI, TX RIVERSIDE, CA 23


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 WHAT DIFFERENTIATES US? • Over six years of actual operating experience • Proven track record with operational transparency • Internally managed • Disciplined acquisition & intelligent aggregation strategy • Resident-centric operating philosophy • Advanced operating systems & technology • Long-term growth-oriented business with attractive returns A Premier SFR Operating Company Focused on Delivering a Best-in-Class Rental Experience 24


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 APPENDIX 25


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 HOW DID WE PERFORM IN THIRD QUARTER 2014?  Total Revenue of $23 million, a 13% increase over second quarter 2014  Net Operating Income (NOI) of $13.4 million, a 15% increase over second quarter 2014  Acquired 1,019 homes, bringing our portfolio to 8,223 homes  Total assets of $1.2 billion as of September 30, 2014  Restored 945 homes in the quarter  Stabilized Occupancy of 93% as of September 30, 2014  Total Occupancy of 82% as of September 30, 2014  Resident Retention of 71% for the quarter  Renewal rent increases averaging 3.4% for the quarter  Completed $342 million asset-backed securitization transaction 26 Strong Progress in Occupancy and Financial Stability


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 HOW DID WE PERFORM IN THIRD QUARTER 2014? 27 For the Three Months Ended ($ Thousands, except per share data) 9/30/2014 6/30/2014 Operating Data Revenue from Single-Family Properties $ 22,351 $ 19,488 Total Revenue $ 23,485 $ 20,754 Property Operating Expenses $ 10,037 $ 9,099 Net Operating Income (NOI) $ 13,448 $ 11,655 NOI Margin 57.3% 56.2% NOI - Self-Managed Assets $ 11,141 $ 9,187 NOI Margin – Self-Managed Assets 52.6% 50.2% Core Funds From Opertations (Core FFO) $ 3,854 $ 3,675 Core FFO per Share $ 0.12 $ 0.11 G&A Expense/Total Revenues (%) 17.3% 16.9% Annualized G&A Expense/Total Assets (%) 1.29% 1.29% QUARTERLY OPERATING OVERVIEW Financial Results


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 STRATEGICALLY ACQUIRED PORTFOLIO See Supplemental Notes hereto for footnotes references above 28 Per Leased Home MSA / Metro Division Number of Homes Average Purchase Price Per Home(1) Average Capital Expenditures Per Home(2) Aggregate Investment Per Home (3) Aggregate Investment (in Thousands) Percentage Leased Average Age (Years) Average Size (Sq. Ft.) Average Monthly Rent Average Annual Gross Rent as a % of Average Investment(4) Phoenix, AZ 1,381 $138,068 $ 8,206 $ 146,274 $ 202,005 92.7 % 17 1,713 $ 1,044 8.6 % Houston, TX 1,098 $140,945 $ 7,029 $ 147,974 $ 162,475 92.7 % 7 1,932 $ 1,390 11.3 % Dallas-Fort Worth, TX 954 $151,971 $ 10,237 $ 162,208 $ 154,746 78.2 % 11 2,100 $ 1,457 10.8 % Nashville, TN 651 $162,000 $ 10,659 $ 172,659 $ 112,401 77.0 % 10 1,901 $ 1,383 9.9 % Atlanta, GA 775 $127,730 $ 9,066 $ 136,796 $ 106,017 53.5 % 16 2,051 $ 1,163 10.6 % Florida 577 $123,575 $ 8,208 $ 131,783 $ 76,039 56.7 % 13 1,706 $ 1,075 10.4 % Other Texas 360 $166,626 $ 10,627 $ 177,253 $ 63,811 83.3 % 10 1,977 $ 1,567 10.7 % Charlotte, NC-SC 309 $152,128 $ 6,442 $ 158,570 $ 48,998 71.2 % 9 2,062 $ 1,204 9.5 % Inland Empire, CA 213 $157,045 $ 24,420 $ 181,465 $ 38,652 96.2 % 16 1,915 $ 1,405 9.3 % Raleigh, NC 231 $143,820 $ 7,102 $ 150,922 $ 34,863 81.0 % 9 1,734 $ 1,223 9.8 % Indianapolis, IN 455 $ 65,440 $ 7,241 $ 72,681 $ 33,070 73.2 % 50 1,351 $ 836 13.1 % Winston-Salem, NC 234 $122,618 $ 3,143 $ 125,761 $ 29,428 93.6 % 12 1,426 $ 1,086 10.4 % Other California 82 $110,013 $ 21,828 $ 131,841 $ 10,811 89.0 % 36 1,336 $ 1,058 9.6 % Las Vegas, NV 68 $ 98,095 $ 12,361 $ 110,456 $ 7,511 92.6 % 15 1,553 $ 1,034 11.1 % Other 225 $139,781 $ 7,437 $ 147,218 $ 33,124 94.7 % 9 1,605 $ 1,245 10.2 % Total/Wtd. Average 7,613 $137,323 $ 8,999 $ 146,322 $ 1,113,951 80.1% 15 1,837 $ 1,236 10.2% Self-Managed Properties (as of September 30, 2014)


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 STRATEGICALLY ACQUIRED PORTFOLIO See Supplemental Notes hereto for footnotes references above 29 MSA / Metro Division Number of Homes Aggregate Investment (in Thousands) Average Investment Per Home(1) Percent Leased(2) Average Age (Years) Average Size (Sq. Ft.) Phoenix, AZ 1,381 $ 202,005 $ 146,274 92.7 % 17 1,713 Houston, TX 1,098 $ 162,475 $ 147,974 92.7 % 7 1,932 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX 954 $ 154,746 $ 162,208 78.2 % 11 2,100 Nashville, TN 651 $ 112,401 $ 172,659 77.0 % 10 1,901 Atlanta, GA 775 $ 106,017 $ 136,796 53.5 % 16 2,051 Florida 577 $ 76,039 $ 131,783 56.7 % 13 1,706 Chicago, IL 511 $ 66,787 $ 130,699 100.0 % 55 1,406 Other Texas 360 $ 63,811 $ 177,253 83.3 % 10 1,977 Charlotte, NC-SC 309 $ 48,998 $ 158,570 71.2 % 9 2,062 Inland Empire, CA 213 $ 38,652 $ 181,465 96.2 % 16 1,915 Indianapolis, IN 554 $ 37,683 $ 68,020 78.0 % 52 1,317 Raleigh, NC 231 $ 34,863 $ 150,922 81.0 % 9 1,734 Winston-Salem, NC 234 $ 29,428 $ 125,761 93.6 % 12 1,426 Other California 82 $ 10,811 $ 131,841 89.0 % 36 1,336 Las Vegas, NV 68 $ 7,511 $ 110,456 92.6 % 15 1,553 Other MSAs/Metro Divisions 225 $ 33,124 $ 147,218 94.7 % 9 1,605 Total/Weighted Average 8,223 $ 1,185,351 $ 144,151 81.6% 18 1,802 Total Portfolio (as of September 30, 2014)


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 WHAT IS THE PROFILE OF THE PORTFOLIO BY GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION? 30 Phoenix, AZ $202,005 17% Houston, TX $162,475 14% Dallas-Fort Worth, TX $154,746 13% Nashville, TN $112,401 9% Atlanta, GA $106,017 9% Florida $76,039 6% Chicago, IL $66,787 6% Other Texas $63,811 5% Charlotte, NC-SC $48,998 4% Inland Empire, CA $38,652 3% Indianapolis, IN $37,683 3% Raleigh, NC $34,863 3% Other MSA $33,124 3% Winston-Salem, NC $29,428 2% Other California $10,811 1% Las Vegas, NV $7,511 1% Distribution by Market as a % of Total Investment (in thousands)- September 30, 2014


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 HOW MUCH HAVE HOME PRICES APPRECIATED? Uneven Recovery has Created Opportunities to Buy at a Discount in Select Markets 31 ARPI Portfolio(1) HPA Trends(2)(3) Market Homes Total Investment (Millions) % of Total Investment Since Q2 2012 Last 12 Months Phoenix, AZ 1,381 $202.0 17.0% 36.0% 9.8% Houston, TX 1,098 $162.5 13.7% 21.6% 10.2% Dallas-Fort Worth, TX 954 $154.8 13.1% 16.3% 7.0% Nashville, TN 651 $112.4 9.5% 17.3% 7.7% Chicago, IL 511 $66.8 5.6% 12.3% 4.4% Atlanta, GA 775 $106.0 8.9% 25.6% 10.4% Other Texas 360 $63.8 5.4% 15.1% 9.6% Florida 577 $76.0 6.4% 22.4% 8.6% Inland Empire, CA 213 $38.7 3.3% 39.8% 14.2% Indianapolis, IN 554 $37.7 3.2% 7.9% 4.7% Charlotte, NC-SC 309 $49.0 4.1% 13.3% 6.0% Raleigh, NC 231 $34.9 2.9% 9.5% 4.5% Winston-Salem, NC 234 $29.4 2.5% 5.4% 3.0% Other California 82 $10.8 0.9% 37.0% 17.6% Las Vegas, NV 68 $7.5 0.6% 50.3% 17.5% Other MSA/Metro Divisions 225 $33.1 2.8% 8.7% 5.0% Total / Weighted Averages 8,223 $1,185.4 100.0% 21.8%(4) 8.4%(4) Source for HPA: FHFA Purchase-Only & All Transactions Index as of most recent quarterly data release (June 30, 2014) See Supplemental Notes hereto for footnotes references above


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 NOI RECONCILIATION 32 Three Months Ended 9/30/2014 6/30/2014 3/31/2014 12/31/2013 9/30/2013 Loss from continuing operations before equity in net (loss) income of unconsolidated ventures $ (9,243) $ (7,646) $ (7,744) $ (8,467) $ (4,638) Acquisition 98 14 67 140 301 Depreciation and amortization 12,576 10,920 9,464 7,826 6,589 General, administrative and other 4,056 3,498 3,720 4,056 3,105 Interest 5,961 4,869 4,230 2,856 1,204 Net Operating Income $ 13,448 $ 11,655 $ 9,737 $ 6,411 $ 6,561 Preferred operator rental revenue (1,273) (1,310) (1,368) (926) (1,948) Mortgage financing revenue (1,034) (1,158) (1,411) (1,515) (1,488) NOI – Self Managed Assets $ 11,141 $ 9,187 $ 6,958 $ 3,970 $ 3,125 Net Operating Income (NOI) and NOI margin are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures. NOI excludes acquisition, depreciation and amortization, general, administrative and other and interest expenses. We consider NOI to be a meaningful financial measure because we believe it is helpful to investors in understanding operating performance and operating margin of our single-family rental properties. NOI should not be used as a substitute for net income (loss) or net cash flows from operating activities (as computed in accordance with GAAP). Reconciliation of NOI to Net Loss in Accordance with GAAP ($ Amounts in Thousands)


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 FFO & CORE FFO RECONCILIATION 33 Three Months Ended 9/30/2014 6/30/2014 3/31/2014 12/31/2013 9/30/2013 Net Loss $ (9,327) $ (7,742) $ (7,794) $ (8,517) $ (4,558) Add: Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets 12,328 10,711 9,292 7,686 6,472 Funds from Operations (FFO) $ 3,001 $ 2,969 $ 1,498 $ (831) $ 1,884 Add: Non-recurring cash compensation paid upon completion of the IPO - - - - - Add: Non-recurring stock-based compensation related to the vesting of LTIP units upon completion of the IPO - - - - - Add: Acquisition expense(1) 98 14 67 140 301 Add: Severance expense - - - 430 - Add: Non-cash interest expense related to amortization of discount on debt 755 692 664 266 - Core FFO $ 3,854 $ 3,675 $ 2,229 $ 5 $ 2,185 Core FFO attributable to common stockholders(2) $ 3,786 $ 3,612 $ 2,193 $ 5 $ 2,150 Core FFO per share of common stock, basic and diluted $ 0.12 $ 0.11 $ 0.07 $ - $ 0.07 Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding: Basic 32,153,307 32,135,439 32,130,733 32,124,930 32,124,857 Diluted(3) 32,806,646 32,762,816 32,755,110 32,684,249 32,682,307 Reconciliation to FFO & Core FFO The following is a reconciliation of net loss (which we believe is the most comparable GAAP measure) to funds from operations (FFO), and a reconciliation of FFO to Core FFO. Also presented is information regarding the weighted-average number of shares of our common stock outstanding used for the basic and diluted computation per share: See Supplemental Notes hereto for footnotes references above ($ Amounts in Thousands, except share and per-share amounts)


 
EPS\Management Presentation\American Residential Properties - 602505097 SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES (1) Average purchase price includes broker commissions and closing costs (2) Represents average capital expenditures per home as of September 30, 2014. Does not include additional expected or future capital expenditures (3) Represents average purchase price plus average capital expenditures (4) Represents annualized average monthly rent per leased home as a percentage of our average investment (average purchase price per home plus average capital expenditures) per leased home. Does not include a provision for payment of ongoing property expenses (such as insurance, taxes, HOA fees and maintenance) or an allocation of our general and administrative expense, all of which materially impact our results. Accordingly, it should not be interpreted as a measure of profitability, and its utility in evaluating our business is limited. Average monthly rent for leased homes may not be indicative of average rents we may achieve on our vacant homes Page 28 Page 29 (1) For self-managed homes, represents average purchase price (including broker commissions and closing costs) plus average capital expenditures. For preferred operator program homes, represents purchase price (including broker commissions and closing costs) paid by us for the portfolio divided by the number of homes in the portfolio and does not include past, expected or budgeted general and administrative expenses associated with ongoing monitoring activities of our investment. The preferred operator is obligated to pay for all taxes, insurance, other expenses and capital expenditures (including significant capital improvements) required for the management, operation and maintenance of the properties. Accordingly, absent a default by the preferred operator under a long-term lease agreement with us, we expect to incur no expenses related to properties under our preferred operator program, other than general and administrative expenses associated with ongoing monitoring activities of our investment (2) Includes both self-managed homes and preferred operator program homes. We classify homes in our preferred operator program as 100% leased, because each preferred operator is obligated to pay us 100% of the base rent specified in the applicable lease irrespective of whether or not the homes are occupied by residential sub-tenants. This does not mean that 100% of the homes leased to preferred operators are occupied by residential sub-tenants. If a preferred operator is unable to lease a material portion of the homes it leases from us to residential sub-tenants, it may adversely affect such operator’s ability to pay rent to us under the lease. We are also eligible to receive percentage rents on a quarterly basis equal to a fixed percentage of gross revenue that the preferred operator collects from its residential sub-tenants who occupy the homes Page 31 (1) As of September 30, 2014 (2) FHFA Purchase-Only & All Transactions Index as of Q2 2014 (3) Represents HPA for the applicable metropolitan statistical area (MSA). ARPI’s portfolio in each market may not be representative of the entire MSA; therefore, the HPA experienced by ARPI’s portfolio in each market may not be the same as the HPA experienced in the entire MSA and could be materially different. (4) Weighted average HPA is calculated by applying the percentage of ARPI’s total portfolio invested in each of the applicable markets as of September 30, 2014 to the HPA experienced in the applicable market as a whole during the periods presented. ARPI’s portfolio in each market includes homes purchased by ARPI only in certain sub- markets within each of the MSAs. In addition, ARPI’s portfolio in each market includes homes purchased at different times, including recently after the applicable market had already experienced a portion of the HPA shown. Therefore, the HPA experienced by ARPI’s portfolio in each market is likely not the same as the HPA experienced in the entire MSA during the periods presented and the weighted average HPA figures shown are not indicative of the actual HPA experienced by ARPI. Page 33 (1) Includes acquisition expenses primarily related to costs incurred on acquired properties subject to an existing lease and accounted for as a business combination, in accordance with GAAP. (2) Based on a weighted-average interest in the Company’s operating partnership of approximately 98.24%, 98.29%, 98.39%, 98.40%, and 98.41%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, June 30, 2014, March 31, 2014, December 31, 2013, and September 30, 2013, respectively. (3) Assumes the issuance of potentially issuable shares unless the result would be anti-dilutive. Potentially issuable shares include operating partnership units, vested LTIP units, unvested LTIP units and unvested restricted common stock. 34