Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - American Residential Properties, Inc.Financial_Report.xls
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - American Residential Properties, Inc.arpi-9302013xex311.htm
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - American Residential Properties, Inc.arpi-9302013xex322.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - American Residential Properties, Inc.arpi-9302013xex321.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - American Residential Properties, Inc.arpi-9302013xex312.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_______________________________________ 
FORM 10-Q
_______________________________________ 
ý
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013
or
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission File Number 001-35899
_______________________________________ 
AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_______________________________________ 
Maryland
 
45-4941882
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
 
 
7047 East Greenway Parkway, Suite 350
Scottsdale, AZ
 
85254
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(480) 474-4800
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 _______________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
¨
Accelerated filer
¨
 
 
 
 
Non-accelerated filer
x  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  ý
As of November 8, 2013, there were 32,170,434 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding.



AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.
INDEX
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
Item 1A.
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
Item 5.
 
 
 
Item 6.
 
 


2


CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, forecasts, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. These statements are only predictions. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees. Actual events or our investments and results of operations could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “could,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “predict,” “potential” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions.
The forward-looking statements included in this report reflect our current views about future events and are subject to numerous known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and changes in circumstances that may cause our actual results to differ significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. Statements regarding the following subjects, among others, may be forward-looking:
our business and investment strategy;
our projected operating results;
economic, demographic or real estate developments in our markets;
home value appreciation, employment growth, residential building permits, median household income and household formation in our markets;
defaults on, early terminations of or non-renewal of leases by our tenants;
our ability to identify properties to acquire and completing acquisitions;
increased time and/or expense to gain possession and restore properties;
our ability to successfully operate acquired properties;
projected operating costs;
rental rates or vacancy rates;
our ability to obtain financing arrangements;
general volatility of the markets in which we participate;
our expected investments;
interest rates and the market value of our target assets;
impact of changes in governmental regulations, tax law and rates and similar matters;
our ability to qualify and maintain our qualification as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes;
availability of qualified personnel;
estimates relating to our ability to make distributions to our stockholders in the future;
our understanding of our competition; and
market trends in our industry, real estate values, the debt securities markets or the general economy.
The forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations of future events, taking into account all information currently available to us. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future events or of our performance. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us. Some of these events and factors are described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and in “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other risks and uncertainties detailed in this and our other reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity, cash flows and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed in or implied by our forward-looking statements. New risks and uncertainties arise over time, and it is not possible for us to predict the occurrence of those matters or the manner in which they may affect us. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to, and do not intend to, update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You should, therefore, not rely on these forward-looking statements as of any date subsequent to the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

3


PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(amounts in thousands, except share amounts)
 
September 30, 2013 (unaudited)
 
December 31, 2012
Assets
 
 
 
Investment in real estate:
 
 
 
Land
$
141,827

 
$
44,381

Building and improvements
540,446

 
171,598

Furniture, fixtures and equipment
6,175

 
1,994

 
688,448

 
217,973

Less: accumulated depreciation
(11,551
)
 
(1,277
)
Investment in real estate, net
676,897

 
216,696

Mortgage financings
39,473

 
13,025

Cash and cash equivalents
24,321

 
101,725

Acquisition deposits
1,406

 
217

Rents and other receivables, net
2,756

 
1,703

Due from related party
21

 
26

Deferred leasing costs and lease intangibles, net
2,243

 
1,576

Deferred financing costs, net
3,761

 
44

Investment in unconsolidated ventures
27,112

 
10,060

Goodwill
3,500

 
3,500

Other, net
3,072

 
855

Total assets
$
784,562

 
$
349,427

Liabilities and Equity
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Revolving credit facility
$
170,000

 
$

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
10,867

 
2,438

Security deposits
2,774

 
626

Prepaid rent
849

 
132

Total liabilities
184,490

 
3,196

Equity:
 
 
 
American Residential Properties, Inc. stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding

 

Common stock $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 32,170,434 and 18,387,257 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively
322

 
184

Additional paid-in capital
612,770

 
346,851

Accumulated deficit
(22,745
)
 
(6,139
)
Total American Residential Properties, Inc. stockholders’ equity
590,347

 
340,896

Non-controlling interests
9,725

 
5,335

Total equity
600,072

 
346,231

Total liabilities and equity
$
784,562

 
$
349,427

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(amounts in thousands, except share and per-share amounts)
(unaudited)
 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months 
 Ended 
 September 30,
 
Period from March 30, (inception) to September 30,
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Revenue:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Self-managed rental revenue
 
$
7,520

 
$
497

 
$
15,430

 
$
501

Preferred operator rental revenue
 
1,948

 

 
5,318

 

Management services (related party)
 
113

 
86

 
327

 
145

Interest and other
 
1,488

 
83

 
3,649

 
115

Total revenue
 
11,069

 
666

 
24,724

 
761

Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating and maintenance
 
2,489

 
336

 
4,915

 
338

Real estate taxes
 
1,791

 
205

 
3,315

 
233

Homeowners’ association fees
 
228

 
119

 
746

 
119

Acquisition
 
301

 
305

 
3,750

 
326

Depreciation and amortization
 
6,589

 
415

 
14,367

 
422

General, administrative and other
 
3,105

 
1,714

 
12,319

 
2,934

Interest
 
1,204

 

 
2,257

 

Total expenses
 
15,707

 
3,094

 
41,669

 
4,372

Loss from continuing operations before equity in net income of unconsolidated ventures
 
(4,638
)
 
(2,428
)
 
(16,945
)
 
(3,611
)
Equity in net income of unconsolidated ventures
 
50

 

 
110

 

Net loss and comprehensive loss
 
(4,588
)
 
(2,428
)
 
(16,835
)
 
(3,611
)
Net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interests
 
73

 
40

 
229

 
59

Net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(4,515
)
 
$
(2,388
)
 
$
(16,606
)
 
$
(3,552
)
Basic and diluted loss per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(0.14
)
 
$
(0.21
)
 
$
(0.65
)
 
$
(0.32
)
Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding
 
32,124,857

 
11,199,757

 
25,447,193

 
11,199,757

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
(amounts in thousands, except share amounts)
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
(unaudited)
 
 
 
Number of
Shares
Common
Stock
 
Common
Stock
 
Preferred
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 
Accumulated
Deficit
 
Non-
Controlling
Interests
 
Total
Equity
Balance, January 1, 2013
 
18,387,257

 
$
184

 
$

 
$
346,851

 
$
(6,139
)
 
$
5,335

 
$
346,231

Issuance of common stock
 
13,737,600

 
137

 

 
265,756

 

 

 
265,893

Net loss
 

 

 

 

 
(16,606
)
 
(229
)
 
(16,835
)
Other comprehensive loss
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation
 
45,577

 
1

 

 
163

 

 
4,619

 
4,783

Balance, September 30, 2013
 
32,170,434

 
$
322

 
$

 
$
612,770

 
$
(22,745
)
 
$
9,725

 
$
600,072

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6


AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
 
Nine Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 2013
 
Period from
March 30, 2012
(inception) to
September 30, 2012
Operating activities
 
 
 
Net loss
$
(16,835
)
 
$
(3,611
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
14,367

 
422

Amortization of stock-based compensation
4,783

 
1,409

Amortization of deferred financing costs
911

 

Bad debt expense
1,229

 
10

Straight line rent revenue
(519
)
 

Equity in net income of unconsolidated ventures
(110
)
 

Distributions from unconsolidated ventures
110

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Rent and other receivables, net
(1,763
)
 
(379
)
Due from related party
5

 
(145
)
Deferred leasing costs
(1,133
)
 
(75
)
Other assets, net
(2,455
)
 
(403
)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
10,464

 
1,455

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
9,054

 
(1,317
)
Investing activities:
 
 
 
Improvements of real estate
(14,492
)
 
(907
)
Property acquisitions, including acquired in-place leases
(458,542
)
 
(84,910
)
Investment in mortgage financings
(48,942
)
 
(2,111
)
Repayments from mortgage financings
22,494

 
91

Contributions to unconsolidated ventures
(18,000
)
 

Distributions from unconsolidated ventures
948

 

Increase in acquisition deposits
(1,189
)
 
(409
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(517,723
)
 
(88,246
)
Financing activities:
 
 
 
Borrowings under revolving credit facility
279,000

 

Repayments of revolving credit facility
(109,000
)
 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock
288,471

 
223,879

Common stock issuance transaction costs
(22,578
)
 
(15,180
)
Deferred financing costs paid
(4,628
)
 

Net cash provided by financing activities
431,265

 
208,699

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(77,404
)
 
119,136

Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of period
101,725

 

Cash and cash equivalents—end of period
$
24,321

 
$
119,136

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities
 
 
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses for additions to investments in real estate
$
1,042

 
$
170

Cash paid for interest
$
1,201

 
$

Acquisition of management company business in exchange for operating
partnership units
$

 
$
3,500

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

7


AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(unaudited)
 
1.
Company’s Organization and Operations
As used in these condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes, the terms “American Residential Properties, Inc.,” the “Company,” “us,” “we” and “our” refer to American Residential Properties, Inc. We are an internally managed real estate company organized as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, that acquires, owns and manages single-family homes as rental properties. As of September 30, 2013, we own 5,440 properties in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas. We conduct substantially all of our operations through (1) American Residential Properties OP, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, or our Operating Partnership, in which we have a 98.4% interest as of September 30, 2013 and for which, through our wholly owned subsidiary, American Residential GP, LLC, we serve as sole general partner, and (2) American Residential Properties TRS, LLC, or our TRS, which is our taxable REIT subsidiary.
Upon closing our initial private offering in May 2012, we issued 11,198,757 shares of our common stock to various institutional investors and accredited investors at an offering price of $20.00 per share, and we received approximately $208.7 million of net proceeds. Upon closing our follow-on private offering in December 2012, we issued 7,187,500 shares of our common stock to various institutional investors and accredited investors at an offering price of $20.50 per share, and we received approximately $138.3 million of net proceeds. We contributed the net proceeds from these offerings and the sale of shares to our founders at incorporation to our Operating Partnership in exchange for an aggregate of 18,387,257 units of limited partnership interest in our Operating Partnership, or OP units. In addition, upon closing our initial private offering, we acquired substantially all of the assets of American Residential Management, Inc., or ARM, a company co-owned by our founders, Stephen G. Schmitz, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, and Laurie A. Hawkes, our President and Chief Operating Officer, pursuant to a contribution and sale agreement between our Operating Partnership and ARM (Note 9). ARM is the vehicle within which our founders further developed our proprietary real estate acquisition and management platform. Our Operating Partnership issued 175,000 OP units to ARM and we paid $85,000 in cash as consideration for our acquisition of the ARM assets. As a result, upon completion of our initial private offering, we owned our founders’ proprietary real estate acquisition and management platform.
On January 25, 2013, we issued 37,600 shares of our common stock at a price of $20.50 per share in a private placement pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and we received gross proceeds of approximately $0.8 million.
On May 14, 2013, we completed our initial public offering, or our IPO, of 13,700,000 shares of our common stock at an offering price of $21.00 per share, and we received approximately $265.1 million of net proceeds, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions, structuring fee and other offering expenses payable by us.
The Company’s September 30, 2013 condensed consolidated financial statements and results of operations include a comparison to the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012. We were formed on March 30, 2012 (inception) and had no operating activity before May 11, 2012. We consider May 11, 2012, the closing date of our initial private offering and of our acquisition of the ARM assets, to be the date on which we first commenced investment activities.
We have made an election to qualify, and believe we are operating so as to qualify, as a REIT for federal income tax purposes beginning with our short taxable year ended December 31, 2012. Assuming that we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we will generally not be subject to federal income taxes to the extent that we distribute substantially all of our taxable income to our stockholders and meet other specific requirements.
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Accounting and Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, have been condensed or omitted according to such SEC rules and regulations. Management believes, however, that the disclosures included in these interim condensed consolidated financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements for the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through December 31, 2012, included in the Company’s prospectus dated May 8, 2013 and filed with the SEC on May 9, 2013. In the

8


opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the normal, recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the information required to be set forth therein. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of American Residential Properties, Inc., our Operating Partnership and the wholly owned subsidiaries of our Operating Partnership. All majority-owned subsidiaries are consolidated and included in our condensed consolidated financial statements. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to conform to the current period presentation.
Investment in Real Estate
Property acquired not subject to an existing lease is accounted for as an asset acquisition, with the property recorded at the purchase price, including acquisition costs, and allocated between land and building and improvements based upon their relative fair values at the date of acquisition. Property acquired with an existing lease is recorded as a business combination. For properties acquired through portfolio transactions, we determine whether the acquisition qualifies as a business combination based on the nature and status of the properties as of the acquisition date. A portfolio comprised of properties that are substantially leased at acquisition is treated as a business combination. A portfolio comprised of properties that are substantially vacant at acquisition is treated as an asset acquisition. For property acquisitions accounted for as business combinations, the land, building and improvements and the existing lease are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition, with acquisition costs expensed as incurred.
Fair value is determined under the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, primarily based on unobservable market data inputs, which are categorized as Level 3 inputs. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, we utilize our market knowledge and published market data. Our real estate portfolio is depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, ranging from 5 to 27.5 years.
We sometimes acquire portfolios of leased properties from established local operators through our “preferred operator” program. In this program, we acquire portfolios of leased properties for which the operator retains day-to-day management responsibilities pursuant to a longer-term lease. In these arrangements, the operator is responsible for all property-related expenses and we receive payments from the operator that escalate over the term of the lease. In-place lease intangibles associated with the preferred operator program are valued based on management’s estimates of lost rent and carrying costs. In-place lease intangibles associated with the acquisition of self-managed homes are valued based on management’s estimate of lost rent during the time it would take to locate a tenant and execute a lease if the property were vacant, considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating lost rent and carrying costs, management considers market rents, real estate taxes, insurance, costs to execute similar leases (including leasing commissions) and other related costs. The value assigned to in-place leases is amortized on a straight-line basis as a component of depreciation and amortization expense over the remaining initial term of the related lease. The leases reflect market rental rates.
We incur costs to prepare our acquired properties to be rented. These costs (including direct internal costs) are capitalized and allocated to building costs. Costs related to the restoration or improvement of our properties (including direct internal costs, primarily comprised of payroll expense) that improve and extend their useful lives are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Expenditures for ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Significant indicators of impairment may include, but are not limited to, declines in home values, rental rates and occupancy percentages and significant changes in the economy. We make our assessment at the individual property level because it represents the lowest level of cash flows. If an impairment indicator exists, we compare the expected future undiscounted cash flows from the property against its net carrying amount. We prepare our future undiscounted

9


cash flow analysis using estimates based on current rental rates, renewals and occupancy, operating expenses and inputs from our annual planning process and historical performance. When preparing these estimates, we consider each property’s historical results, current operating trends and current market conditions. These estimates may be impacted by variable factors, including inflation, expected rental rates, the general health of the economy and market competition. If the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows is less than the net carrying amount of the property, we record an impairment loss for the difference between the estimated fair value of the individual property and the carrying amount of the property at that date. To determine the estimated fair value, we consider both recent comparable homes sales and the use of discounted projected future cash flows. The rates used to discount projected future cash flows reflect market discount rates. No impairments were recorded during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2013, the three months ended September 30, 2012 or the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012.
Mortgage Financings
We hold mortgage financing receivables for investment. The receivables are carried at cost, net of related unamortized premiums or discounts, if any. The mortgage loans are secured by single-family homes.
Interest income on mortgage financings is recognized on the effective interest method applied on a loan-by-loan basis. Direct costs, if any, associated with funding loans are offset against any related fees received and the balance, along with any premium or discount, is deferred and amortized as an adjustment to interest income over the terms of the related loans using the effective interest method.
Mortgage loans as of September 30, 2013 include approximately $38.0 million of short-term loans with a weighted-average interest rate of approximately 11.9% and a weighted-average remaining term of approximately 106 days and approximately $1.5 million in long-term loans with a weighted-average interest rate of approximately 8.0% and a weighted-average remaining term of approximately 29 years.
Rents and Other Receivables, Net
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses that may result from the inability of tenants, preferred operators or borrowers to make required rent or other payments. This allowance is estimated based on payment history and current credit status. If a tenant, preferred operator or borrower fails to make contractual payments beyond any allowance, we may recognize bad debt expense in future periods equal to the amount of unpaid rent, interest or principal and deferred rent. We generally do not require collateral or other security from our tenants, other than security deposits. Mortgage loans are secured by single-family homes. If estimates of collectibility differ from the cash received, then the timing and amount of our reported revenue could be impacted.
Our rents and other receivables for self-managed and preferred operator program homes are presented net of an allowance for doubtful accounts in our condensed consolidated balance sheet of approximately $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for a total of $0.9 million as of September 30, 2013. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $41,000 as of December 31, 2012.
We recorded a provision for doubtful accounts for self-managed homes of approximately $0.4 million and $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. We recorded a provision for doubtful accounts for preferred operator program homes of approximately $0.4 million and $0.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. The total provision for doubtful accounts was approximately $0.8 million and $1.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. We recorded a provision for doubtful accounts for self-managed homes of approximately $10,000 and $10,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012, respectively. There was no provision for doubtful accounts recorded for preferred operator program homes in 2012.
Investments in Unconsolidated Ventures
Investments in ventures are generally accounted for under the equity method of accounting when we exercise significant influence over the venture but we do not serve as managing member or control the venture. Net income/loss allocations are included in the investment balance along with the contributions made and distributions received over the life of the investment. In May 2013, we invested approximately $18.0 million in Red Rock River LLC, a joint-venture in which our equity interest is approximately 62% of the total amount invested. The joint-venture used invested funds to purchase portfolios of residential mortgage loans.


10


Income Taxes
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 to 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, commencing with our short taxable year ended December 31, 2012. We believe that we have operated in such a manner as to satisfy the requirements for qualification as a REIT. Accordingly, we will not be subject to federal income tax, provided that we qualify as a REIT and our distributions to our stockholders equal or exceed our REIT taxable income.
However, qualification and taxation as a REIT depend upon our ability to meet the various qualification tests imposed under the Code related to the percentage of income that we earn from specified sources, the percentage of our assets that fall within specified categories, the diversity of our capital stock ownership, and the percentage of our earnings that we distribute. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that we will be organized or be able to operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal and state income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate tax rates, and we may be ineligible to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent tax years. Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state or local income taxes, and our TRS will be subject to federal, state and local taxes on its income.
We have elected to treat our TRS as a taxable REIT subsidiary. Certain activities that we undertake will be conducted in our TRS, such as third-party property management and non-customary services for our tenants and holding assets that we cannot hold directly. Our TRS is subject to both federal and state income taxes.
Comprehensive Loss
Net loss and comprehensive loss are the same for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and for the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, or the SEC. We adopt the new pronouncements as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, these new accounting pronouncements include technical corrections to existing guidance or introduce new guidance related to specialized industries or entities and therefore we believe will have minimal, if any, impact on our financial position or results of operations upon adoption.
3.
Lease Intangibles
Our identifiable intangible assets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are summarized as follows (amounts in thousands):
 
September 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Acquired in-place leases
$
5,286

 
$
1,897

Less: accumulated amortization
(3,851
)
 
(453
)
Intangible lease assets, net
$
1,435

 
$
1,444

The impact of the amortization of acquired in-place leases on our depreciation and amortization expense is approximately $1.2 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and approximately $3.4 million and $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and for the period March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012, respectively.
4.
Debt
In January 2013, we entered into a $150 million senior secured revolving credit facility, or the Original Credit Facility, with a syndicate of major national banks. In September 2013, we entered into an amended and restated $340 million senior secured revolving credit facility, or the Credit Facility, with a syndicate of major national banks, which amended and restated in its entirety the $150 million Original Credit Facility. The Credit Facility has an accordion feature that allows us, assuming our compliance with applicable covenants and at the lenders’ discretion, to borrow up to $500 million thereunder if certain criteria are met. The amount available for us to borrow under the Credit Facility is subject to limitations governed by calculations based on the cost, value and debt yield supported by our properties that form the borrowing base of the Credit Facility. The credit agreement requires us to comply with various financial covenants as well as customary affirmative and negative covenants that restrict our ability to, among other things, incur debt and liens, make investments, dispose of properties and make distributions. The Credit Facility is secured by our ownership interest in American Residential Leasing Company, LLC, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of our Operating Partnership. As of September 30, 2013, we were in compliance with all of the financial covenants of the Credit Facility.

11


The Credit Facility matures in January 2015 and has an optional one-year extension (assuming our compliance with applicable covenants). Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest, at our option, at either the one-month, two-month, three-month or six-month Eurodollar rate or the base rate, plus, in each case, a spread based on a ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value (each as defined in the credit agreement that governs the Credit Facility) ranging from less than or equal to 45% to greater than 55%. The Eurodollar rate for an interest period is the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, for a term equivalent to such period plus a spread ranging from 2.50% to 3.25% (determined as described in the preceding sentence) and the base rate for any day is a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, (b) Bank of America's "prime rate" for such day and (c) the one-month Eurodollar rate plus 1.00% plus a spread ranging from 1.50% to 2.25% (determined as described in the preceding sentence). We are also required to pay a quarterly fee on the unused portion of the Credit Facility at a rate of between 0.35% and 0.45% per annum, based on the actual daily unused balance during a fiscal quarter. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company incurred non-utilization fees of $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively.
Prior to the completion of our IPO on May 14, 2013, $109.0 million was outstanding under the Original Credit Facility. Proceeds from the IPO were utilized to repay the entire outstanding balance. As of September 30, 2013, $170.0 million was outstanding under the Credit Facility, bearing weighted-average interest at a rate of 2.68%, with remaining availability of $73.0 million. Subsequent to September 30, 2013, we borrowed an additional $40.0 million.
As a result of entering into the Original Credit Facility and the Credit Facility, we incurred aggregate costs of $4.7 million which have been deferred and are included in deferred financing costs, net on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. These costs are being amortized to interest expense over the remaining initial term of the Credit Facility. The Company amortized $0.4 million and $0.9 million of deferred financing costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.
5.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic net income or loss attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing reported net income or loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common and contingently issuable shares outstanding during each period.
A reconciliation of our net loss per share is as follows (amounts in thousands, except share and per-share amounts):
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months 
 Ended 
 September 30,
 
March 30, 2012 (inception) to September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
$
(4,515
)
 
$
(2,388
)
 
$
(16,606
)
 
$
(3,552
)
Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted
32,124,857

 
11,199,757

 
25,447,193

 
11,199,757

Net loss per share of common stock, basic and diluted
$
(0.14
)
 
$
(0.21
)
 
$
(0.65
)
 
$
(0.32
)
For all periods presented, no potentially dilutive securities were included in computing loss per share of common stock as their effect would be anti-dilutive. Potentially dilutive securities excluded were OP and vested LTIP units, unvested LTIP units, and unvested restricted stock. The weighted-average number of shares of potentially dilutive securities were as follows:
 
Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
March 30, 2012 (inception) to September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
OP and vested LTIP units
520,274

 
185,490

 
357,969

 
185,490

Unvested LTIP units
182,577

 
464,432

 
333,540

 
464,432

Unvested restricted stock
46,827

 

 
23,842

 

Potentially dilutive shares
749,678

 
649,922

 
715,351

 
649,922

6.
Stockholders’ Equity
On May 14, 2013, we completed our IPO of 13,700,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $21.00 per share, and we received approximately $265.1 million of net proceeds, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions, structuring fee and other offering expenses payable by us.

12



7.
Stock Compensation
We award stock-based compensation to certain employees and members of our Board of Directors through the American Residential Properties, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, or our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. Under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors has the ability to grant nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted shares of our common stock, restricted stock units, dividend equivalents, stock appreciation rights and other awards to our officers, employees, directors and other persons providing services to our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. The number of shares of our common stock available for grant under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan is subject to an aggregate limit of 1,500,000 shares. Our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan expires on May 11, 2022, except as to any grants which are then outstanding. As of September 30, 2013, there were 915,240 shares of our common stock available for grant under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.
Upon completion of our IPO in May 2013, our Board of Directors awarded an aggregate of 416,665 LTIP units and shares of restricted common stock to senior management. In May 2013, we issued 21,429 LTIP units and 30,952 shares of restricted common stock pursuant to these awards. In November 2013, we issued 338,094 performance-based LTIP units pursuant to these awards.
We recorded stock-based compensation cost of approximately $0.5 million and $4.8 million as part of general, administrative and other expense in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. The stock-based compensation cost recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and for the period March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012 was $0.8 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
LTIP Units
Under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, we may grant LTIP units. LTIP units are a special class of partnership interests in our Operating Partnership with certain restrictions, which are convertible into Operating Partnership units, or OP units, subject to satisfying vesting and other conditions. LTIP unit holders are entitled to receive the same distributions as holders of our OP units (only if we pay such distributions) on the unvested portion of their LTIP units. The vesting of LTIP units is determined at the time of the grant and may be based on performance criteria. Any unvested LTIP units are forfeited, except in limited circumstances, as determined by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors, when the recipient is no longer employed by us or when a director leaves our Board of Directors for any reason. LTIP units may be subject to full or partial accelerated vesting under certain circumstances, as described in the applicable award agreement. LTIP units are valued at fair value on the date of grant, with compensation expense recorded in accordance with the applicable vesting schedule over the periods in which the restrictions lapse, which approximates a straight-line basis. We valued the LTIP units at a per-unit value equivalent to the per-share offering price of our common stock sold in our private and public offerings less a discount for lack of marketability estimated with the assistance of a third-party consultant.
The following table summarizes information about the LTIP units outstanding as of September 30, 2013:
 
Total Vested
Units
 
Total Unvested
Units
 
Total
Outstanding
Units
 
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair
Value (Per Unit)
Balance, December 31, 2012
10,490

 
493,432

 
503,922

 
$
17.00

Granted

 
35,261

 
35,261

 
$
16.72

Vested
334,785

 
(334,785
)
 

 
$
17.00

Converted

 

 

 

Canceled

 

 

 

Balance, September 30, 2013
345,275

 
193,908

 
539,183

 
$
16.98

Upon the completion of our IPO in May 2013, a total of 262,460 LTIP units vested in accordance with the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.
Total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested LTIP units totaled approximately $2.6 million as of September 30, 2013, and is expected to be recognized in general, administrative and other expense over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.8 years, subject to the stated vesting conditions.



13


Restricted Stock
Under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, we may grant restricted shares of our common stock. Restricted shares of our common stock are valued at fair value on the date of the grant, with compensation expense recorded in accordance with the applicable vesting schedule over the periods in which the restrictions lapse, which approximates a straight-line basis.
The following table summarizes information about the shares of restricted common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2013:
 
Number of
Shares
 
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair
Value (Per Share)
Unvested at December 31, 2012

 

Granted
46,827

 
$
21.00

Vested

 

Canceled
(1,250
)
 
$
21.00

Unvested at September 30, 2013
45,577

 
$
21.00

Total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested shares of restricted common stock totaled approximately $0.8 million as of September 30, 2013, and is expected to be recognized in general, administrative and other expense over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.5 years, subject to stated vesting conditions.
8.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The three levels of fair value defined in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, are as follows:
Level 1—Valuations based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access.
Level 2—Valuations based on quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted market prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3—Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities, which are typically based on the reporting entity’s own assumptions.
Companies are required to disclose the estimated fair values of all financial instruments, even if they are not carried at their fair value. The fair values of financial instruments are estimates based upon market conditions and perceived risks as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. These estimates require management’s judgment and may not be indicative of the future fair values of the assets and liabilities.
Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, acquisition deposits, rents and other receivables, due from related party and accounts payable and accrued expenses. The carrying amount of these instruments approximates fair value because of their short-term nature.
Our mortgage financings and the Credit Facility are also financial instruments, and we estimated their fair value based on market quotes for comparable instruments or discounted cash flow analysis using estimates of the amount and timing of future cash flows, market rates and credit spreads. The estimated fair values using Level 3 assumptions approximate the carrying amounts of our mortgage financing receivables and the Credit Facility.
9.
Transactions With Related Parties
In connection with the closing of our initial private offering on May 11, 2012, we acquired from ARM the proprietary, vertically integrated real estate acquisition and management platform that Mr. Schmitz and Ms. Hawkes developed in exchange for 175,000 OP units, valued at $3.5 million, representing a 1.5% limited partnership interest in our Operating Partnership, and approximately $85,000 in cash. The OP units were valued at $20 per unit, equivalent to the offering price per share of our common stock sold in our initial private offering.
Prior to February 2013, we earned management services fees from ARM pursuant to a cancellable sub-management agreement for the provision of real estate management services to ARM. These services allowed ARM to fulfill its obligations to ARP Phoenix Fund I, LP, or Phoenix Fund, pursuant to a management agreement between ARM and Phoenix Fund. The general partner of Phoenix Fund is ARP Phoenix Fund I GP, LLC, which is owned by Mr. Schmitz and Ms. Hawkes. These

14


services included property restoration, leasing and property management and disposition services with respect to the properties owned by Phoenix Fund. Under the sub-management agreement, ARM was required to reimburse our TRS for the actual expenses incurred by our TRS to perform its obligations under the sub-management agreement, plus a fee of 1.0% of the gross rental revenue earned from Phoenix Fund with respect to the properties managed by ARM.
In February 2013, ARM, Phoenix Fund and our TRS terminated the property management and sub-management agreements for the provision of real estate management services to Phoenix Fund, and our TRS entered into a management agreement directly with Phoenix Fund, pursuant to which our TRS performs the same services to Phoenix Fund for a fee in an amount equal to 6.0% of the gross rental revenue received by Phoenix Fund with respect to the properties managed by our TRS.
We earned approximately $0.1 million and $86,000 in property management fees during the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $0.3 million and $0.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and for the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012, respectively, under the prior and current management agreements, which are included in management services (related party) in our condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. Accounts receivable of approximately $21,000 and $26,000 due from Phoenix Fund and ARM are included in due from related party in our condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
Phoenix Fund purchased 150,000 shares of our common stock in our initial private offering.
10.
Non-Controlling Interests
Non-controlling common units of our Operating Partnership relate to the interest in our Operating Partnership that is not owned by us and are presented as non-controlling interests in the equity section of our condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Non-controlling common units of our Operating Partnership have essentially the same economic characteristics as shares of our common stock as they share equally in the net income or loss and distributions of our Operating Partnership. Our limited partners have the right to redeem all or part of their non-controlling common units of our Operating Partnership following the one-year anniversary of issuance. At the time of redemption, we have the right to determine whether to redeem the non-controlling common units of our Operating Partnership for cash, based upon the fair value of an equivalent number of shares of our common stock at the time of redemption, or exchange them for unregistered shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, issuance of stock rights, specified extraordinary distribution and similar events. In the event of a termination or liquidation of us and our Operating Partnership, it is expected that in most cases each common unit would be entitled to a liquidating distribution equal to the amount payable with respect to each share of our common stock. As of September 30, 2013, there were 520,275 outstanding non-controlling common units of our Operating Partnership, representing an approximate 1.6% ownership interest in our Operating Partnership. These units are comprised of 175,000 units issued in connection with our acquisition of the assets and management platform from ARM and 345,275 vested LTIP units.
Net income or loss attributable to non-controlling common units of our Operating Partnership is allocated based on their relative ownership percentage of the Operating Partnership during the period. The non-controlling ownership interest percentage is determined by dividing the number of non-controlling common units outstanding by the total of the shares of our common stock and non-controlling units outstanding at the balance sheet date. The issuance or redemption of additional shares of our common stock or common units results in changes to our limited partners’ ownership interest in our Operating Partnership, as well as our net assets. As a result, all equity-related transactions result in an allocation between stockholders’ equity and the non-controlling common units of our Operating Partnership in the condensed consolidated balance sheet to account for any change in ownership percentage during the period. Our limited partners’ weighted-average share of our net loss was 1.6% and 1.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and 1.4% and 1.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and for the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012, respectively.
11.
Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
From time to time, we are subject to potential liability under various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Liabilities are established for legal claims when payments associated with the claims become probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. The actual costs of resolving legal claims may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts established for those claims. Based on information currently available, management is not aware of any legal claims that would have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements and therefore no accrual is required as of September 30, 2013.

15


Accepted Purchase Offers
As of September 30, 2013, we have committed to purchase rental properties totaling approximately $49.8 million. These are offers to purchase rental properties that were accepted by the sellers but not closed as of September 30, 2013.
Homeowners’ Association Fees
Certain of our properties are located in communities that are subject to homeowners’ association, or HOA, fees. The fees are generally billed monthly and subject to annual adjustments. The fees cover the costs of maintaining common areas and are generally paid for by us.
Concentrations
Approximately 52.6% of our properties are located in Arizona and Texas, which exposes us to greater economic risks than if we owned a more geographically dispersed portfolio.
Executive Bonus
We entered into employment agreements with our Chief Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer under which we were committed to pay bonuses relating to the registration and listing or the public issuance of our common stock. Each of the two executives was entitled to be paid a special cash bonus of $250,000 if, by April 30, 2013, we filed with the SEC a shelf registration statement relating to the registration of the shares sold in our initial private offering for resale in accordance with the terms set forth in the related registration rights agreements, and each of the two executives was entitled to be paid an additional special cash bonus of $250,000 if, prior to October 29, 2013, the shares sold in our initial private offering had become registered with the SEC and listed on a national securities exchange. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the criteria for the bonuses were fully satisfied and we paid, and recognized as compensation expense, bonuses totaling $1 million in connection with these obligations.
12.
Subsequent Events
For the period from October 1, 2013 to October 31, 2013, we acquired 217 single-family homes for a total purchase price of approximately $31.5 million and have contracted to acquire 302 single-family homes for a total purchase price of approximately $43.6 million. Additionally, for the period from October 1, 2013 to October 31, 2013, we funded approximately $8.8 million in private mortgage loans.
On November 7, 2013, we entered into a mutual release agreement to terminate the master leases with one of our preferred operators. We have taken operational control of the Company-owned properties, which the preferred operator had been operating pursuant to the leases, and transferred the 280 homes into our self-managed portfolio, of which 138 homes are in Florida, 131 homes are in Georgia and 11 homes are in North Carolina.


16


Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This report, including the following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements based upon our current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” as well as the risk factors described in “Item IA. Risk Factors,” of this report.
Overview
We are an internally managed real estate company that acquires, owns and manages single-family homes as rental properties. In 2008, our founders, Stephen G. Schmitz, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, and Laurie A. Hawkes, our President and Chief Operating Officer and a member of our Board of Directors, identified a unique opportunity to acquire homes at distressed pricing and lease them at attractive rental rates. They subsequently began developing a vertically integrated platform to acquire and manage single-family homes on an institutional scale. We were formed to expand upon our founders’ vision, strategy and platform.
As of September 30, 2013, we owned 5,440 properties in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas with an aggregate investment of $698.1 million, and we managed an additional 609 properties for ARP Phoenix Fund I, LP, or Phoenix Fund, in Arizona and Nevada. For the period from October 1, 2013 to October 31, 2013, we acquired 217 single-family homes for a total purchase price of approximately $31.5 million and have contracted to acquire 302 single-family homes for a total purchase price of approximately $43.6 million, of which 203 homes are in Texas, 85 homes are in North Carolina, 69 homes are in Illinois, 63 homes are in Tennessee, 41 homes are in Arizona, 17 homes are in Georgia, 13 homes are in Ohio, 12 homes are in Indiana, 7 homes are in Florida, 4 homes are in Nevada, 4 homes are in South Carolina and 1 home is in California. We actively evaluate new markets to identify investment opportunities that we believe can generate attractive risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders. There is no assurance that we will close on the properties we have under contract.
Our primary business strategy is to acquire, restore, lease and manage single-family homes as well-maintained investment properties to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns over the long-term. We employ a disciplined and focused approach to evaluating acquisition opportunities, considering the mix of rent yield and future home price appreciation potential when selecting a market and investment. Our strategic aggregation of single-family homes provides a strong foundation for creating long-term home price appreciation in our portfolio. We believe our founders’ five years of direct experience in the single-family rental sector provides us with the expertise to successfully execute our business strategy nationally to institutional standards. We have the infrastructure to acquire large numbers of properties through multiple acquisition channels. We source individual properties through auctions and brokers, and portfolios of properties through brokerages or directly from operators, investors or banks, and, in the future, we may source assets from these channels and government-sponsored entities, or GSEs. We have the experience and resources necessary to restore homes to “rent-ready” condition in an efficient and cost-effective manner, to a standard that we believe appeals to our target tenants’ preferences, enabling us to attract qualified tenants and to provide a high level of service to retain our tenants. We believe that our vertically integrated acquisition and management platform is critical to executing our strategy.
In addition to our primary business strategy of acquiring, restoring, leasing and managing single-family homes, we have a private mortgage financing strategy that generates attractive returns on invested capital and provides us access to acquisition opportunities and valuable market data. As of September 30, 2013, our private mortgage portfolio had an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $38.0 million, a weighted-average interest rate of 11.9% per annum and a weighted-average remaining term of 106 days. We also owned an additional $1.5 million in long-term mortgage investments. Additionally, for the period from October 1, 2013 to October 31, 2013, we funded approximately $8.8 million in private mortgage loans.
We plan to continue acquiring single-family homes and other residential real estate related assets in markets that satisfy our investment criteria. Over time, we expect that the proportion of our total assets invested in self-managed properties, properties leased to and managed by third-party preferred operators and in private mortgage financings will vary depending upon available investment opportunities and other factors. We conduct substantially all of our operations through our Operating Partnership, in which we own a 96.7% interest, including the sole 0.4% general partnership interest that we hold through a subsidiary as of September 30, 2013 after giving effect to vested and unvested LTIP awards, including those we committed to award upon completion of the IPO.
We have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for federal income tax purposes beginning with our short taxable year ended December 31, 2012. Assuming that we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we will generally not be subject

17


to federal income taxes to the extent that we distribute substantially all of our taxable income to our stockholders and meet other specific requirements. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal and state income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate tax rates, and we may be ineligible to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent tax years. Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state or local income taxes, and our TRS, which is our taxable REIT subsidiary, will be subject to federal, state and local taxes on its income at regular corporate rates.
Industry Outlook
Residential housing is the largest real estate asset class in the United States with a size of approximately $18.6 trillion, according to the 2013 second quarter Federal Reserve Flow of Funds release. Historically, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, approximately one-third of this asset class has been rented and single-family homes currently comprise roughly one-third of all residential rental housing.
We believe that there has been an over-correction in residential housing prices in certain housing markets from their historic peak, creating the potential for home price appreciation. We also believe that there continues to be a large supply of single-family homes that we can purchase at potentially attractive pricing. The current housing market environment across our current markets, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, North Carolina, Nevada, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas, remains highly attractive for single-family home acquisition and rental. We are able to acquire homes at favorable pricing, and the potential supply remains strong.
Property Portfolio
The following three tables present summary statistics of our single-family homes by metropolitan statistical area, or MSA, and metropolitan division, or metro division, as of September 30, 2013, in descending order of aggregate investment. The first table includes our entire portfolio of single-family homes. The second table includes only the single-family homes that we manage. The third table includes only the single-family homes that our preferred operators manage.
Total Portfolio of Single-Family Homes - Summary Statistics
(September 30, 2013)
 
MSA/Metro Division
 
 Number of Homes
 
 Aggregate Investment
 
 Average Investment Per Home (1)
 
 Percentage Leased (2)
 
 Average Age (years)
 
 Average Size (square feet)
Phoenix, AZ
 
1,363

 
$
193,504,008

 
$
141,969

 
78
%
 
16

 
1,714

Houston, TX
 
830

 
$
116,068,279

 
$
139,841

 
74
%
 
5

 
1,832

Dallas-Fort Worth, TX
 
455

 
$
69,675,534

 
$
153,133

 
43
%
 
11

 
2,047

Chicago, IL
 
437

 
$
57,152,850

 
$
130,785

 
100
%
 
55

 
1,427

Inland Empire, CA
 
213

 
$
37,640,487

 
$
176,716

 
94
%
 
15

 
1,915

Other Texas
 
213

 
$
35,050,324

 
$
164,556

 
23
%
 
8

 
1,933

Raleigh, NC
 
189

 
$
27,086,412

 
$
143,314

 
76
%
 
8

 
1,706

Winston-Salem, NC
 
207

 
$
25,722,036

 
$
124,261

 
84
%
 
11

 
1,378

Indianapolis, IN
 
470

 
$
24,202,903

 
$
51,496

 
97
%
 
59

 
1,212

Charlotte, NC-SC
 
146

 
$
20,925,919

 
$
143,328

 
21
%
 
8

 
1,914

Atlanta, GA
 
230

 
$
18,724,273

 
$
81,410

 
87
%
 
20

 
1,594

Florida
 
226

 
$
17,005,040

 
$
75,244

 
89
%
 
11

 
1,303

Nashville, TN
 
121

 
$
11,382,490

 
$
94,070

 
90
%
 
9

 
1,465

Other California
 
82

 
$
10,309,585

 
$
125,727

 
82
%
 
35

 
1,336

Las Vegas, NV
 
66

 
$
6,869,833

 
$
104,088

 
92
%
 
14

 
1,544

Other MSA/Metro Divisions
 
192

 
$
26,796,381

 
$
139,564

 
33
%
 
8

 
1,593

Total/Weighted Average
 
5,440

 
$
698,116,354

 
$
128,330

 
75
%
 
19

 
1,662

 
(1)
For self-managed homes, represents average purchase price (including broker commissions and closing costs) plus average capital expenditures. For preferred operator program homes, represents purchase price (including broker commissions and closing costs) paid by us for the portfolio divided by the number of homes in the portfolio and does not include past, expected or budgeted general and administrative expenses associated with ongoing monitoring activities of our investment. The preferred operator is obligated to pay for all taxes, insurance, other expenses and

18


capital expenditures (including significant capital improvements) required for the management, operation and maintenance of the properties. Accordingly, absent a default by the preferred operator under a long-term lease agreement with us, we expect to incur no expenses related to properties under our preferred operator program, other than general and administrative expenses associated with ongoing monitoring activities of our investment.
(2)
Includes both self-managed homes and preferred operator program homes. We classify homes in our preferred operator program as 100% leased, because each preferred operator is obligated to pay us 100% of the base rent specified in the applicable lease irrespective of whether or not the homes are occupied by residential sub-tenants. This does not mean that 100% of the homes leased to preferred operators are occupied by residential sub-tenants. If a preferred operator is unable to lease a material portion of the homes it leases from us to residential sub-tenants, it may adversely affect such operator’s ability to pay rent to us under the lease. We are also eligible to receive percentage rents on a quarterly basis equal to a fixed percentage of gross revenue that the preferred operator collects from its residential sub-tenants who occupy the homes.
Portfolio of Self Managed Single-Family Homes - Summary Statistics
(September 30, 2013)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Leased Homes
MSA/Metro Division
 
 Number of Homes
 
 Average Purchase Price Per Home (1)
 
 Average Capital Expenditures Per Home (2)
 
 Average Investment Per Home (3)
 
 Aggregate Investment
 
 Percentage Leased
 
 Average Age (years)
 
 Average Size (square feet)
 
 Average Monthly Rent Per Leased Home
 
Annual Average Rent per Leased Home as a Percentage of Average Investment Per Leased Home (4)
Phoenix, AZ
 
1,197

 
$
147,607

 
$
4,705

 
$
152,312

 
$
182,317,042

 
75
%
 
11

 
1,780

 
$
1,046

 
8.5
%
Houston, TX
 
830

 
$
137,555

 
$
2,286

 
$
139,841

 
$
116,068,279

 
74
%
 
5

 
1,832

 
$
1,262

 
11.3
%
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX
 
455

 
$
149,351

 
$
3,782

 
$
153,133

 
$
69,675,534

 
43
%
 
11

 
2,047

 
$
1,437

 
11.2
%
Inland Empire, CA
 
213

 
$
156,692

 
$
20,024

 
$
176,716

 
$
37,640,487

 
94
%
 
15

 
1,915

 
$
1,391

 
9.5
%
Other Texas
 
213

 
$
160,513

 
$
4,043

 
$
164,556

 
$
35,050,324

 
23
%
 
8

 
1,933

 
$
1,443

 
11.0
%
Raleigh, NC
 
189

 
$
140,407

 
$
2,907

 
$
143,314

 
$
27,086,412

 
76
%
 
8

 
1,706

 
$
1,207

 
10.1
%
Winston-Salem, NC
 
207

 
$
122,792

 
$
1,469

 
$
124,261

 
$
25,722,036

 
84
%
 
11

 
1,378

 
$
1,086

 
10.5
%
Charlotte, NC-SC
 
135

 
$
143,651

 
$
3,059

 
$
146,710

 
$
19,805,819

 
15
%
 
8

 
1,919

 
$
1,335

 
10.2
%
Nashville, TN
 
121

 
$
93,496

 
$
574

 
$
94,070

 
$
11,382,490

 
90
%
 
9

 
1,465

 
$
1,110

 
14.4
%
Florida
 
88

 
$
118,166

 
$
2,943

 
$
121,109

 
$
10,657,592

 
73
%
 
16

 
1,582

 
$
1,067

 
10.9
%
Other California
 
82

 
$
108,437

 
$
17,290

 
$
125,727

 
$
10,309,585

 
82
%
 
35

 
1,336

 
$
1,042

 
9.8
%
Atlanta, GA
 
67

 
$
104,966

 
$
4,713

 
$
109,679

 
$
7,348,463

 
57
%
 
19

 
1,807

 
$
1,068

 
12.0
%
Las Vegas, NV
 
52

 
$
104,458

 
$
9,327

 
$
113,785

 
$
5,916,822

 
90
%
 
6

 
1,627

 
$
1,052

 
11.0
%
Indianapolis, IN
 
36

 
$
100,014

 
$
828

 
$
100,842

 
$
3,630,300

 
64
%
 
10

 
1,558

 
$
1,163

 
14.1
%
Other MSA/Metro Divisions
 
192

 
$
136,752

 
$
2,812

 
$
139,564

 
$
26,796,381

 
33
%
 
8

 
1,593

 
$
1,019

 
11.0
%
Total/Weighted Average
 
4,077

 
$
139,968

 
$
4,601

 
$
144,569

 
$
589,407,566

 
66
%
 
10

 
1,781

 
$
1,173

 
10.0
%
 
(1)
Average purchase price includes broker commissions and closing costs.
(2)
Represents average capital expenditures per home as of September 30, 2013. Does not include additional expected or future capital expenditures.
(3)
Represents average purchase price plus average capital expenditures.
(4)
Represents annualized average monthly rent per leased home as a percentage of our average investment (average purchase price per home plus average capital expenditures) per leased home. Does not include a provision for payment of ongoing property expenses (such as insurance, taxes, HOA fees and maintenance) or an allocation of our general and administrative expense, all of which materially impact our results. Accordingly, it should not be interpreted as a measure of profitability, and its utility in evaluating our business is limited. Average monthly rent for leased homes may not be indicative of average rents we may achieve on our vacant homes.








19


Portfolio of Preferred Operator Program Single-Family Homes - Summary Statistics
(September 30, 2013)
MSA/Metro Division
 
 Number of Homes
 
 Average Investment Per Home (1)
 
 Aggregate Investment
 
 Percentage Leased (2)
 
 Average Age (years)
 
 Average Size (square feet)
 
 Average Monthly Rent Per Home Paid by Preferred Operator to Us (3)
 
 Annual Rent as a Percentage of Average Investment Per Home (4)
Chicago, IL
 
437

 
$
130,785

 
$
57,152,850

 
100
%
 
55

 
1,427

 
$
789

 
7.2
%
Indianapolis, IN
 
434

 
$
47,402

 
$
20,572,602

 
100
%
 
63

 
1,183

 
$
356

 
9.0
%
Atlanta, GA
 
163

 
$
69,790

 
$
11,375,811

 
100
%
 
21

 
1,507

 
$
465

 
8.0
%
Phoenix, AZ
 
166

 
$
67,391

 
$
11,186,966

 
100
%
 
47

 
1,236

 
$
449

 
8.0
%
Florida
 
138

 
$
45,996

 
$
6,347,448

 
100
%
 
9

 
1,126

 
$
307

 
8.0
%
Charlotte, NC-SC
 
11

 
$
101,827

 
$
1,120,100

 
100
%
 
6

 
1,859

 
$
679

 
8.0
%
Las Vegas, NV
 
14

 
$
68,072

 
$
953,011

 
100
%
 
41

 
1,236

 
$
454

 
8.0
%
Total/Weighted Average
 
1,363

 
$
79,757

 
$
108,708,788

 
100
%
 
47

 
1,307

 
$
518

 
7.8
%
 
(1)
Represents purchase price (including broker commissions and closing costs) paid by us for the portfolio divided by the number of homes in the portfolio and does not include past, expected or budgeted general and administrative expenses associated with ongoing monitoring activities of our investment. The preferred operator is obligated to pay for all taxes, insurance, other expenses and capital expenditures (including significant capital improvements) required for the management, operation and maintenance of the properties. Accordingly, absent a default by the preferred operator under a long-term lease agreement with us, we expect to incur no expenses related to properties under our preferred operator program, other than general and administrative expenses associated with ongoing monitoring activities of our investment.
(2)
We classify homes in our preferred operator program as 100% leased, because each preferred operator is obligated to pay us 100% of the base rent specified in the applicable lease irrespective of whether or not the homes are occupied by residential sub-tenants. This does not mean that 100% of the homes leased to preferred operators are occupied by residential sub-tenants. If a preferred operator is unable to lease a material portion of the homes it leases from us to residential sub-tenants, it may adversely affect such operator’s ability to pay rent to us under the lease. We are also eligible to receive percentage rents on a quarterly basis equal to a fixed percentage of gross revenue that the preferred operator collects from its residential sub-tenants who occupy the homes.
(3)
Represents the initial annual base rent payable to us by the preferred operator pursuant to the portfolio lease divided by 12 and then divided by the number of homes included in the lease. Does not include percentage rents we are also eligible to receive in addition to base rents on a quarterly basis equal to a fixed percentage of gross revenue that the preferred operator collects from its residential sub-tenants who occupy the homes. The percentage rents we are eligible to receive fluctuate based on both the occupancy rates of the underlying homes and the rental rates paid by the residential sub-tenants.
(4)
Represents annualized average monthly rent paid by preferred operator to us as a percentage of our average investment per home. The rent paid by the preferred operator is net of all taxes, insurance, other expenses and capital expenses (including significant capital improvements) for which the preferred operator is responsible.
Properties Owned for Six Months or Longer
We acquire both vacant homes and homes subject to existing leases. When we acquire a property that is not leased, we must possess, restore, market and lease the property before it becomes a revenue generating asset. We refer to this process as property stabilization. We anticipate that, on average, the stabilization period for each non-leased property will range from 90 to 180 days, depending on factors such as the channel through which the property was acquired, the age and condition of the property and whether the property was vacant when we acquired it. Similarly, the time to market and lease a property is driven by local demand, our marketing techniques and the size of our available inventory. Consequently, we expect that most properties that were not leased at the time of acquisition should be stabilized within six months thereafter and that properties owned for more than six months provide an indication of how our portfolio will perform over the long-term.



20


For homes acquired subject to a lease, the remaining lease terms at the date of acquisition have averaged approximately six months. Accordingly, a portion of these homes are expected to become vacant within six months of acquisition due to normal tenant turnover. Therefore, our leased rate of homes owned six months or greater is not fully indicative of how we expect our stabilized portfolio to perform over time.
The following three tables present summary statistics of our portfolio of single-family homes we owned for at least six months as of September 30, 2013, in descending order of number of homes. The first table includes our entire portfolio of single-family homes. The second table includes only the single-family homes that we manage. The third table includes only the single-family homes that our preferred operators manage.
Total Portfolio of Single-Family Homes
Owned for Six Months or Longer—Summary Statistics
(September 30, 2013)
MSA/Metro Division
 
 Number of Homes
 
 Average Investment Per Home (1)
 
 Homes Leased
 
 Homes Vacant (2)
 
 Percentage Leased
Phoenix, AZ
 
1,045

 
$
131,890

 
911

 
134

 
87
%
Chicago, IL
 
304

 
$
130,779

 
304

 

 
100
%
Indianapolis, IN
 
265

 
$
53,626

 
260

 
5

 
98
%
Inland Empire, CA
 
209

 
$
176,872

 
198

 
11

 
95
%
Atlanta, GA
 
169

 
$
71,111

 
163

 
6

 
96
%
Florida
 
138

 
$
45,996

 
138

 

 
100
%
Winston-Salem, NC
 
118

 
$
119,637

 
116

 
2

 
98
%
Other California
 
82

 
$
125,727

 
67

 
15

 
82
%
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX
 
78

 
$
162,397

 
66

 
12

 
85
%
Las Vegas, NV
 
63

 
$
103,616

 
59

 
4

 
94
%
Houston, TX
 
24

 
$
119,698

 
21

 
3

 
88
%
Charlotte, NC-SC
 
11

 
$
101,827

 
11

 

 
100
%
Raleigh, NC
 
6

 
$
209,195

 
5

 
1

 
83
%
Other MSA/Metro Divisions
 
19

 
$
94,569

 
17

 
2

 
90
%
Total/Weighted Average
 
2,531

 
$
117,641

 
2,336

 
195

 
92
%
 
(1)
Represents average purchase price plus average capital expenditures.
(2)
As of September 30, 2013, 139 homes were available for rent and 56 homes were undergoing renovation.











21




Portfolio of Self-Managed Single-Family Homes
Owned for Six Months or Longer—Summary Statistics
(September 30, 2013)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Leased Homes
MSA/Metro Division
 
 Number of Homes
 
 Average Purchase Price Per Home (1)
 
 Average Capital Expenditure Per Home (2)
 
 Average Investment Per Home (3)
 
 Homes Leased
 
 Homes Vacant (4)
 
 Percentage Leased
 
 Average Monthly Rent Per Leased Home
 
Annual Average Rent per Leased Home as a Percentage of Average Investment Per Leased Home (5)
Phoenix, AZ
 
887

 
$
139,013

 
$
4,348

 
$
143,361

 
753

 
134

 
85
%
 
$
1,031

 
8.6
%
Inland Empire, CA
 
209

 
$
156,999

 
$
19,873

 
$
176,872

 
198

 
11

 
95
%
 
$
1,392

 
9.5
%
Winston-Salem, NC
 
118

 
$
119,283

 
$
354

 
$
119,637

 
116

 
2

 
98
%
 
$
1,093

 
11.0
%
Other California
 
82

 
$
108,437

 
$
17,290

 
$
125,727

 
67

 
15

 
82
%
 
$
1,042

 
9.8
%
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX
 
78

 
$
158,536

 
$
3,861

 
$
162,397

 
66

 
12

 
85
%
 
$
1,469

 
11.2
%
Las Vegas, NV
 
50

 
$
103,937

 
$
9,397

 
$
113,334

 
46

 
4

 
92
%
 
$
1,047

 
11.0
%
Atlanta, GA
 
28

 
$
67,013

 
$
6,902

 
$
73,915

 
22

 
6

 
79
%
 
$
895

 
14.3
%
Houston, TX
 
24

 
$
119,311

 
$
387

 
$
119,698

 
21

 
3

 
88
%
 
$
1,154

 
11.6
%
Indianapolis, IN
 
20

 
$
101,695

 
$
1,016

 
$
102,711

 
15

 
5

 
75
%
 
$
1,169

 
13.5
%
Raleigh, NC
 
6

 
$
197,068

 
$
12,127

 
$
209,195

 
5

 
1

 
83
%
 
$
1,479

 
9.3
%
Other MSA/Metro Divisions
 
19

 
$
92,936

 
$
1,633

 
$
94,569

 
17

 
2

 
90
%
 
$
1,011

 
12.7
%
Total/Weighted Average
 
1,521

 
$
135,675

 
$
6,951

 
$
142,626

 
1,326

 
195

 
87
%
 
$
1,116

 
9.4
%
 
(1)
Average purchase price includes broker commissions and closing costs.
(2)
Represents average capital expenditures per home as of September 30, 2013. Does not include additional expected or future capital expenditures.
(3)
Represents average purchase price plus average capital expenditures.
(4)
As of September 30, 2013, 139 homes were available for rent and 56 homes were undergoing renovation.
(5)
Represents annualized average monthly rent per leased home as a percentage of our average investment (average purchase price per home plus average capital expenditures) per leased home. Does not include a provision for payment of ongoing property expenses (such as insurance, taxes, HOA fees and maintenance) or an allocation of our general and administrative expense, all of which materially impact our results. Accordingly, it should not be interpreted as a measure of profitability, and its utility in evaluating our business is limited. Average monthly rent for leased homes may not be indicative of average rents we may achieve on our vacant homes.
Portfolio of Preferred Operator Program Single-Family Homes
Owned for Six Months or Longer—Summary Statistics
(September 30, 2013)
MSA/Metro Division
 
 Number of Homes
 
 Average Investment Per Home (1)
 
 Percentage Leased (2)
 
 Average Monthly Rent Per Home Paid by Preferred Operator to Us
 
Annual Rent as a Percentage of Average Investment Per Home (3)
Chicago, IL
 
304

 
$
130,751

 
100
%
 
$
801

 
7.3
%
Indianapolis, IN
 
245

 
$
49,619

 
100
%
 
$
372

 
9.0
%
Phoenix, AZ
 
158

 
$
67,643

 
100
%
 
$
451

 
8.0
%
Atlanta, GA
 
141

 
$
70,554

 
100
%
 
$
470

 
8.0
%
Florida
 
138

 
$
45,996

 
100
%
 
$
307

 
8.0
%
Las Vegas, NV
 
13

 
$
67,901

 
100
%
 
$
453

 
8.0
%
Charlotte, NC-SC
 
11

 
$
101,827

 
100
%
 
$
679

 
8.0
%
Total/Weighted Average
 
1,010

 
$
80,090

 
100
%
 
$
523

 
7.8
%

22


 
(1)
Represents purchase price (including broker commissions and closing costs) paid by us for the portfolio divided by the number of homes in the portfolio and does not include past, expected or budgeted general and administrative expenses associated with ongoing monitoring activities of our investment. The preferred operator is obligated to pay for all taxes, insurance, other expenses and capital expenditures (including significant capital improvements) required for the management, operation and maintenance of the properties. Accordingly, absent a default by the preferred operator under a long-term lease agreement with us, we expect to incur no expenses related to properties under our preferred operator program, other than general and administrative expenses associated with ongoing monitoring activities of our investment.
(2)
We classify homes in our preferred operator program as 100% leased, because each preferred operator is obligated to pay us 100% of the base rent specified in the applicable lease irrespective of whether or not the homes are occupied by residential sub-tenants. This does not mean that 100% of the homes leased to preferred operators are occupied by residential sub-tenants. If a preferred operator is unable to lease a material portion of the homes it leases from us to residential sub-tenants, it may adversely affect such operator’s ability to pay rent to us under the lease. We are also eligible to receive percentage rents on a quarterly basis equal to a fixed percentage of gross revenue that the preferred operator collects from its residential sub-tenants who occupy the homes.
(3)
Represents annualized average monthly rent paid by preferred operator to us as a percentage of our average investment per home.
Highlights of Third Quarter of 2013
Amended and Restated Credit Facility
In September 2013, we amended and restated the credit agreement governing our senior secured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of major national banks to, among other things, increase the maximum borrowing capacity of the facility from $150 million to $340 million. The credit facility has an accordion feature that allows us to increase the capacity to $500 million subject to meeting certain criteria and obtaining additional commitments from lenders. The facility matures in January 2015, has an optional one-year extension (assuming our compliance with applicable covenants) and bears interest, at our option, at a rate of LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 2.50% to 3.25% based on a ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value or a base rate plus a spread ranging from 1.50% to 2.25% based on a ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value.
Acquisitions
From July 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013, we acquired 1,351 single-family homes, of which 790 are in Texas, 233 are in North Carolina, 139 are in Arizona, 77 are in Illinois, 57 are in Ohio, 33 are in Indiana, 9 are in Florida, 8 are in Georgia, 2 are in South Carolina, 2 are in Nevada and 1 is in Tennessee, and incurred renovation and re-tenancy costs on our existing portfolio, for a total investment of approximately $211.5 million.

23


Factors Expected to Affect Our Results and Financial Condition
Our results of operations and financial condition are affected by numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control. Key factors that impact our results of operations and financial condition include our pace of acquisitions and ability to deploy our capital, the amount of time and cost required to stabilize newly acquired properties and convert them to revenue generating assets, rental rates, occupancy levels, rates of tenant turnover, the success of our preferred operators, our expense ratios and capital structure.
Property Acquisitions
We have aggressively but prudently grown our portfolio of single-family homes and intend to continue to do so. Our ability to identify and acquire single-family homes that meet our investment criteria is impacted by home prices in our markets, the inventory of properties available for sale through our acquisition channels and competition for our target assets.
We have accumulated a substantial amount of recent data on acquisition costs, restoration costs and the amount of time required to convert an acquired single-family home to a rental property through our management platform and the experience of our founders over the past five years.
Property Stabilization
Unless it is already leased, before an acquired property becomes a revenue generating asset, we must possess, restore, market and lease the property. We refer to this process as property stabilization. The acquisition of properties involves the expenditure of capital in addition to payment of the purchase price, including payments for property inspections, closing costs, title insurance, transfer taxes, recording fees, broker commissions, property taxes, HOA fees (when applicable) and restoration costs. The time and cost involved in stabilizing our newly acquired properties impacts our financial performance and is affected by the amount of time it takes us to gain possession of a property, the amount of time and cost associated with property restoration and the amount of time it takes to market and lease the property. Our possession of each property we acquire can be delayed for a multitude of reasons beyond our control, including applicable statutory rights of redemption, rescission rights and legal challenges to our ownership or unauthorized occupants living in the property at the time of purchase. As part of our underwriting criteria, we typically estimate restoration costs to be 5% to 15% of the purchase price, although actual costs may vary significantly based on market, age and condition of the property and other factors. The time to restore a newly acquired property can vary significantly among properties for several reasons, including the channel through which the property was acquired, the age and condition of the property and whether the property was vacant when we acquired it. Similarly, the time to market and lease a property is driven by local demand, our marketing techniques and the size of our available inventory. We actively monitor these measures and trends.
We anticipate that, on average, the stabilization period for each non-leased property that we acquire will range from 90 to 180 days. We expect that most properties that were not leased at the time of acquisition should be stabilized within six months thereafter and that properties owned for more than six months provide an indication of how our portfolio will perform over the long-term. As of September 30, 2013, we had 2,531 properties owned for six months or longer, of which 92% were leased. We acquire both vacant homes and homes subject to existing leases. To date, the remaining lease terms for homes acquired subject to existing leases at the date of acquisition have averaged approximately six months. Accordingly, a portion of these homes are expected to become vacant within six months of acquisition due to normal tenant turnover. Therefore, our leased rate of homes owned six months or greater is not fully indicative of how we expect our stabilized portfolio to perform over time. We continually track key metrics such as average time to obtain possession, restore and lease our properties.
Revenue
Our revenue comes primarily from rents collected under lease agreements for our properties. These include both short-term leases that we enter into directly with tenants, which typically have a term of one year, and longer-term net leases, which typically have a term of five to ten years, that we enter into with preferred operators who sub-lease the properties to sub-tenants. For the three months ended September 30, 2013, approximately 85.6% of our total revenue was attributable to rental activity, 1.0% was attributable to management services and the remaining 13.4% was attributable to interest earned on our portfolio of private mortgage financings and on cash balances. Over time, we expect most of our revenue to be derived from leasing our properties. The most important drivers of revenue (aside from portfolio growth) are rental and occupancy rates. Our rental and occupancy rates are affected by macroeconomic factors and local and property-level factors, including, market conditions, seasonality, tenant defaults, the amount of time that it takes us to restore properties upon acquisition and the amount of time it takes us to restore and re-lease vacant properties.

24


In each of our markets, we monitor a number of factors that may impact the single-family real estate market and our tenants’ finances, including the unemployment rate, household formation and net population growth, income growth, size and make-up of existing and anticipated housing stock, prevailing market rental and mortgage rates, rental vacancies and credit availability. Growth in demand for rental housing in excess of the growth of rental housing supply, among other factors, will generally drive higher occupancy and rental rates. Negative trends in our markets with respect to these metrics or others could adversely impact our rental revenue.
The growth of our portfolio has been significant in recent months, as we have continued the rate at which we acquire properties. When we commenced investment activities in May 2012, we began acquiring properties in Arizona, California and Nevada. More recently, we have also acquired properties in Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas, and we are actively identifying other markets in which to invest.
We expect that the occupancy of our portfolio will increase as the proportion of recently acquired properties declines relative to the size of our entire portfolio. Nevertheless, in the near term, our ability to drive revenue growth will depend in large part on our ability to efficiently restore and lease newly acquired properties, maintain occupancy in the rest of our portfolio and acquire additional properties, both leased and vacant.
The following table summarizes our acquisition and leasing activity from July 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013.
 
 
Total Owned Properties as of June 30, 2013
 
Property Acquisitions Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
 
Total Owned Properties as of September 30, 2013
 
Percent of Properties Leased as of June 30, 2013 (1)
 
Percent of Properties Leased as of September 30, 2013 (1)
Self-managed properties
2,833

 
1,244

 
4,077

 
68
%
 
66
%
Preferred operator program properties (2)
1,256

 
107

 
1,363

 
100
%
 
100
%
Total properties
4,089

 
1,351

 
5,440

 
78
%
 
75
%
 
(1)
It may take up to six months to stabilize a property that was vacant at the time of its acquisition and for it to begin generating revenue. In addition, properties may be leased more than once in a given period. The amount presented represents the properties that were leased as of the end of the period.
(2)
We classify homes in our preferred operator program as 100% leased, because each preferred operator is obligated to pay us 100% of the base rent specified in the applicable lease irrespective of whether or not the homes are occupied by residential sub-tenants. This does not mean that 100% of the homes leased to preferred operators are occupied by residential sub-tenants. If a preferred operator is unable to lease a material portion of the homes it leases from us to residential sub-tenants, it may adversely affect such operator’s ability to pay rent to us under the lease. We are also eligible to receive percentage rents on a quarterly basis equal to a fixed percentage of gross revenue that the preferred operator collects from its residential sub-tenants who occupy the homes.
From July 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013, we acquired 1,351 single-family homes, of which 790 are in Texas, 233 are in North Carolina, 139 are in Arizona, 77 are in Illinois, 57 are in Ohio, 33 are in Indiana, 9 are in Florida, 8 are in Georgia, 2 are in South Carolina, 2 are in Nevada, and 1 is in Tennessee, and incurred renovation and re-tenancy costs on our existing portfolio, for a total investment of approximately $211.5 million. For the period from October 1, 2013 to October 31, 2013, we acquired 217 single-family homes for a total purchase price of approximately $31.5 million and have contracted to acquire 302 single-family homes for a total purchase price of approximately $43.6 million, of which 203 homes are in Texas, 85 homes are in North Carolina, 69 homes are in Illinois, 63 homes are in Tennessee, 41 homes are in Arizona, 17 homes are in Georgia, 13 homes are in Ohio, 12 homes are in Indiana, 7 homes are in Florida, 4 homes are in Nevada, 4 home are in South Carolina and 1 home is in California. We actively evaluate new markets to identify investment opportunities that we believe can generate attractive risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders. There is no assurance that we will close on the properties we have under contract.
Expenses
Our ability to acquire, restore, lease and maintain our portfolio in a cost-effective manner will be a key driver of our operating performance. We monitor the following categories of expenses that we believe most significantly affect our results of operations.


25


Property-Related Expenses
Once we acquire and restore a self-managed property, we have ongoing property-related expenses, including HOA fees (when applicable), taxes, insurance, ongoing costs to market and maintain the property and expenses associated with tenant turnover. Certain of these expenses are not subject to our control, including HOA fees, property insurance and real estate taxes. We expect that certain of our costs, including insurance costs and property management costs, will account for a smaller percentage of our revenue as we expand our portfolio, achieve larger scale and negotiate volume discounts with third-party service providers and vendors. For properties leased to preferred operators, we have no day-to-day operating responsibilities or property-related expenses, because such responsibilities and expenses are obligations of the operators pursuant to the terms of the leases. As of September 30, 2013, 1,363 of our properties were managed by local operators through our preferred operator program.
Property Management
We provide all property management functions for our self-managed properties. For the properties we manage, these functions include: securing the property upon acquisition; coordinating with the utilities; controlling the restoration process; managing the leasing process; communicating with tenants; collecting rents; conducting periodic inspections, routine property maintenance and repairs; paying HOA fees; interfacing with vendors and contractors; and accounting and compliance.
By performing these functions internally for our self-managed properties, we believe that we establish improved communications, foster direct relationships with tenants, gain tighter control over the quality and cost of restorations and property maintenance, gain increased attention and focus of third-party leasing agents and improve the timeliness of rental receipts. In addition, we believe that our internal management structure will allow us to manage properties more efficiently than many of our competitors who are externally managed.
Overhead
We will incur expenses associated with our vertically integrated real estate acquisition and management platform, such as compensation expense and other general and administrative costs. In the near term, as our business grows, we expect to hire additional employees, which will increase our general and administrative costs. In addition, we will incur additional costs related to operating as a public company due to increased legal, insurance, accounting and other expenses related to corporate governance, SEC reporting and other compliance matters. Over time, we expect these costs to decline as a percentage of revenue as our portfolio grows.
Based on our experience, we believe that the property-related expenses for vacancy, bad debt, property taxes, insurance, HOA fees, repairs and maintenance and capital expenditure reserves and the costs for property management services, such as managing the process of restoring, marketing, leasing and maintaining our stabilized single-family homes, will average between 55% and 60% of gross rental revenue. Variations in asset level returns will be due to a variety of factors, including location, age and condition of the property and the efficiency of our property management services.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
We believe our financial results during the three months ended September 30, 2013 are not representative of our future financial results. As we have been experiencing rapid growth since the commencement of our investment activities, we have a greater percentage of our portfolio invested in assets in the process of stabilization than we would expect to have as our company continues to mature. Newly acquired properties that are not leased at the time of acquisition will not begin generating revenue during this process of stabilization to offset fixed expenses incurred and, therefore, will reduce our overall financial performance in the near term. Accordingly, our operating margin has an opportunity to improve as vacant properties in our self-managed portfolio are leased and begin generating rental revenue. The following are our results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

26


Income Statement Data
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Revenue:
 
 
 
Rental revenue
$
9,468

 
$
497

Management services revenue
113

 
86

Interest and other
1,488

 
83

Total revenue
11,069

 
666

Expenses:
 
 
 
Property operating and maintenance
2,489

 
336

Real estate taxes
1,791

 
205

Homeowners’ association fees
228

 
119

Acquisition
301

 
305

Depreciation and amortization
6,589

 
415

General, administrative and other
3,105

 
1,714

Interest
1,204

 

Total expenses
15,707

 
3,094

Loss from continuing operations before equity in net income of
   unconsolidated ventures
(4,638
)
 
(2,428
)
Equity in net income of unconsolidated ventures
50

 

Net loss and comprehensive loss
(4,588
)
 
(2,428
)
Net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interests
73

 
40

Net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders
$
(4,515
)
 
$
(2,388
)
Rental Revenue
Rental revenue includes rental revenue from our residential properties, application fees and lease termination fees. Our rental revenue of approximately $9.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was comprised of approximately $7.5 million of rental revenue from self-managed properties and approximately $1.9 million of revenue from preferred operator program properties. As of September 30, 2013, approximately 75% of our properties were leased. Rental revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $0.5 million as we commenced operations in May 2012 and acquired our first properties in June 2012. Subsequent to quarter end, we entered into an agreement to terminate the leases with one of our preferred operators covering 280 homes. We have taken operational control of the Company-owned properties, which the preferred operator had been operating previously pursuant to the leases, and we are transitioning these homes into our self-managed portfolio. In connection with this termination, we recorded a provision for doubtful accounts of $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013.
Management Services Revenue
Management services revenue was $0.1 million and $86,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. From the completion of our initial private offering through February 11, 2013, management services revenue represented fee income earned from ARM for property restoration, leasing and management services provided to Phoenix Fund under a sub-management agreement with ARM. Since February 11, 2013, management services revenue represents fee income earned from Phoenix Fund for property restoration, leasing and management services provided to Phoenix Fund under a management agreement between Phoenix Fund and our TRS.
Interest and Other Revenue
Interest and other revenue was $1.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and includes interest income earned on private mortgage financings and interest income earned on cash balances held with financial institutions. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, interest and other revenue was approximately $83,000 and includes interest income earned on cash balances held with financial institutions.


27


Property Operating and Maintenance
Property operating and maintenance expenses were $2.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and include all direct and indirect costs related to operating our residential properties, including management personnel, insurance, utilities, landscaping and general repairs and maintenance, other than real estate taxes and HOA fees, which are presented separately in our September 30, 2013 unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations. Property operating and maintenance expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were approximately $0.3 million as we commenced operations in May 2012.
Real Estate Taxes
Real estate taxes were $1.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Upon acquisition of a home, its real estate taxes are set based upon municipal and state laws. These costs generally remain constant throughout the year and have little variation. Because these expenses are relatively fixed during each year, our operating margin has an opportunity to improve as vacant properties in our self-managed portfolio are leased and begin generating rental revenue. Real estate taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2013 include approximately $0.3 million in accrued property taxes related to the termination of the preferred operator leases on 280 properties in Florida, Georgia and North Carolina. Real estate taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $0.2 million. In subsequent years, real estate taxes will fluctuate based on changes in municipal and state real estate tax rates.
Homeowners’ Association Fees
HOA fees were $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Like real estate taxes, these fees are determined upon each property’s acquisition and generally remain fixed thereafter based upon the existing HOA agreements. HOA fees for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $0.1 million.
Acquisition
Acquisition expenses were $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. These expenses are primarily transaction costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of properties with existing leases, including, but not limited to, payments for property inspections, closing costs, title insurance, transfer taxes, recording fees and broker commissions. For properties that are leased at the time of acquisition, these costs are expensed, rather than capitalized as a component of the acquisition cost (which is the accounting treatment of these costs for properties that are vacant at the time of acquisition). Acquisition expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $0.3 million.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation expense on our real estate portfolio using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, ranging from 5 to 27.5 years, from the date of acquisition. Depreciation and amortization also includes amortization expense related to in-place lease intangibles, deferred leasing costs and other direct costs capitalized associated with leasing our properties, amortized over the remaining term of the related leases. The following table summarizes our depreciation and amortization expense (amounts in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Depreciation of real estate portfolio
$
5,055

 
318

Depreciation of other assets
117

 

Amortization of in-place lease intangibles and other direct costs
1,417

 
97

Total depreciation and amortization
$
6,589

 
$
415

General, Administrative and Other
General, administrative and other expense was $3.1 million and $1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These expenses include payroll expense, stock-based compensation expense, professional fees, insurance expense and office expenses.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs incurred in connection with our senior secured revolving credit facility, or the Credit Facility. There was no interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2012.

28


Equity in Net Income of Unconsolidated Ventures
Equity in net income of unconsolidated ventures was approximately $50,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, and includes our proportionate share of income in Flatiron VI LLC, Siphon Draw LLC and Red Rock River LLC, all of which are Delaware limited liability companies that invest in residential mortgage loans. There was no equity in net income of unconsolidated ventures for the period ended September 30, 2012.
Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to the Period from March 31, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012
The Company’s September 30, 2013 condensed consolidated financial statements and results of operations include a comparison to the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012. We were formed on March 30, 2012 (inception) and had no operating activity before May 11, 2012. We commenced investment activities in May 2012 upon completion of our initial private offering, acquiring our first homes in late June 2012. Through September 30, 2013, we acquired a total of 5,440 properties. We believe our financial results during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not representative of our future financial results. As we have been experiencing rapid growth since the commencement of our investment activities, we have a greater percentage of our portfolio invested in assets in the process of stabilization than we would expect to have as our company continues to mature. Newly acquired properties that are not leased at the time of acquisition will not begin generating revenue during this process of stabilization to offset fixed expenses incurred and, therefore, will reduce our overall financial performance in the near term. Accordingly, our operating margin has an opportunity to improve as vacant properties in our self-managed portfolio are leased and begin generating rental revenue. The following are our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013:
Income Statement Data
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
Period from March 30, (inception) to September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Revenue:
 
 
 
Rental revenue
$
20,748

 
$
501

Management services revenue
327

 
145

Interest and other
3,649

 
115

Total revenue
24,724

 
761

Expenses:
 
 
 
Property operating and maintenance
4,915

 
338

Real estate taxes
3,315

 
233

Homeowners’ association fees
746

 
119

Acquisition
3,750

 
326

Depreciation and amortization
14,367

 
422

General, administrative and other
12,319

 
2,934

Interest
2,257

 

Total expenses
41,669

 
4,372

Loss from continuing operations before equity in net income of
   unconsolidated ventures
(16,945
)
 
(3,611
)
Equity in net income of unconsolidated ventures
110

 

Net loss and comprehensive loss
(16,835
)
 
(3,611
)
Net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interests
229

 
59

Net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders
$
(16,606
)
 
$
(3,552
)
Rental Revenue
Rental revenue includes rental revenue from our residential properties, application fees and lease termination fees. Our rental revenue of approximately $20.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was comprised of approximately $15.4 million of rental revenue from self-managed properties and approximately $5.3 million of revenue from preferred operator program properties. As of September 30, 2013, approximately 75% of our properties were leased. Rental revenue for

29


the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012 was $0.5 million as we commenced operations in May 2012 and acquired our first properties in late June 2012. Subsequent to quarter end, we entered into an agreement to terminate
the leases with one of our preferred operators covering 280 homes. We have taken operational control of the Company-owned properties, which the preferred operator had been operating previously pursuant to the leases, and we are transitioning these homes into our self-managed portfolio. In connection with this termination, we recorded a provision for doubtful accounts of $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Management Services Revenue
Management services revenue was $0.3 million and $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012, respectively. From the completion of our initial private offering through February 11, 2013, management services revenue represented fee income earned from ARM for property restoration, leasing and management services provided to Phoenix Fund under a sub-management agreement with ARM. Since February 11, 2013, management services revenue represents fee income earned from Phoenix Fund for property restoration, leasing and management services provided to Phoenix Fund under a management agreement between Phoenix Fund and our TRS.
Interest and Other Revenue
Interest and other revenue was $3.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and includes interest income earned on private mortgage financings and interest income earned on cash balances held with financial institutions. Interest and other revenue for the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012 was $0.1 million as we commenced operations in May 2012.
Property Operating and Maintenance
Property operating and maintenance expenses were $4.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and include all direct and indirect costs related to operating our residential properties, including management personnel, insurance, utilities, landscaping and general repairs and maintenance, other than real estate taxes and HOA fees, which are presented separately in our September 30, 2013 unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations. Property operating and maintenance expenses for the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012 were $0.3 million as we commenced operations in May 2012.
Real Estate Taxes
Real estate taxes were $3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Upon acquisition of a home, its real estate taxes are set based upon municipal and state laws. These costs generally remain constant throughout the year and have little variation. Because these expenses are relatively fixed during each year, our operating margin has an opportunity to improve as vacant properties in our self-managed portfolio are leased and begin generating rental revenue. In subsequent years, real estate taxes will fluctuate based on changes in municipal and state real estate tax rates. Real estate taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 include approximately $0.3 million in accrued property taxes related to the termination of the preferred operator leases on 280 properties in Florida, Georgia and North Carolina. Real estate taxes for the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012 were $0.2 million as we commenced operations in May 2012.
Homeowners’ Association Fees
HOA fees were $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Like real estate taxes, these fees are determined upon acquisition and generally remain fixed based upon existing HOA agreements. HOA fees for the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012 were $0.1 million as we commenced operations in May 2012.
Acquisition
Acquisition expenses were $3.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. These expenses are primarily transaction costs incurred in connection with the acquisition of properties with existing leases, including but not limited to, payments for property inspections, closing costs, title insurance, transfer taxes, recording fees and broker commissions. For properties that are leased at the time of acquisition, these costs are expensed, rather than capitalized as a component of the acquisition cost (which is the accounting treatment of these costs for properties that are vacant at the time of acquisition). Acquisition expenses for the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012 were $0.3 million as we commenced operations in May 2012.


30


Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation expense on our real estate portfolio using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, ranging from 5 to 27.5 years, from the date of acquisition. Depreciation and amortization also includes amortization expense related to in-place lease intangibles, deferred leasing costs and other direct costs capitalized associated with leasing our properties, amortized over the remaining term of the related leases. The following table summarizes our depreciation and amortization expense (amounts in thousands):
 
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 
Period from March 30, (inception) to September 30,
 
2013
 
2012
Depreciation of real estate portfolio
$
10,274

 
$
323

Depreciation of other assets
238

 

Amortization of in-place lease intangibles and other direct costs
3,855

 
99

Total depreciation and amortization
$
14,367

 
$
422

General, Administrative and Other
General, administrative and other expense was $12.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. These expenses include payroll expense, professional fees, insurance expense and office expenses. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, these expenses also include $4.8 million in non-cash stock compensation expense and $1.0 million in bonuses awarded to our Chief Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer upon registration of shares sold in our initial private offering and upon completion of our IPO, pursuant to their respective employment agreements. The $4.8 million in non-cash stock compensation expense includes $3.1 million in non-recurring, accelerated vesting expense incurred upon completion of our IPO in May 2013. General, administrative and other expense was $2.9 million for the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012. These expenses include payroll expenses, professional fees, insurance expense and office expenses, including $1.4 million in non-cash stock compensation expense.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and also includes the amortization of deferred financing costs incurred in connection with our senior secured revolving credit facility, or the Credit Facility. There was no interest expense for the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012.
Equity in Net Income of Unconsolidated Ventures
Equity in net income of unconsolidated ventures was approximately $110,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and includes our proportionate share of income in Flatiron VI LLC, Siphon Draw LLC and Red Rock River LLC, all of which are Delaware limited liability companies that invest in residential mortgage loans. There was no equity in net income of unconsolidated ventures for the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. We base estimates on the best information available to us at the time, our experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. From time to time, we re-evaluate our estimates and assumptions. In the event estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current estimates and assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. A summary of our critical accounting policies is included in our final prospectus dated May 8, 2013 and filed with the SEC on May 9, 2013 in the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” We have not made any material changes to these policies during the periods covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 to the September 30, 2013 unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.



31


Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is a measure of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, maintain our assets, fund our operations and make distributions to our stockholders and other general business needs. Our liquidity, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive and other factors that are beyond our control. Our near-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of purchasing our target assets, restoring and leasing properties and funding our operations.
Our long-term liquidity needs consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for the acquisition, restoration and maintenance of properties; HOA fees; real estate taxes; non-recurring capital expenditures; interest and principal payments on incurred indebtedness; payment of quarterly distributions to our stockholders to the extent declared by our Board of Directors; and general and administrative expenses. We expect to incur between 5% and 15% of the total purchase price of vacant homes acquired on restorations in order to prepare the acquired home for rental activities. On homes that are currently leased, we expect to incur between $1,500 to $2,500 in retenancy costs on average, in order to prepare the home for rent to a new tenant if and when the existing tenant does not renew their lease and ultimately vacates the home at lease expiration. The nature of our business, our aggressive growth plans and the requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain, to our stockholders, may cause us to have substantial liquidity needs over the long-term, although we have not had any taxable income to date. We will seek to satisfy our long-term liquidity needs through cash flow from operations, long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness, the issuance of debt and equity securities, including OP units, property dispositions and joint venture transactions. We have financed our operations and acquisitions to date through the issuance of equity securities and borrowings under the Credit Facility. We expect to meet our operating liquidity requirements generally through cash on hand and cash provided by operations (as we lease up acquired single-family homes). We anticipate that cash on hand, cash provided by operations and borrowings under the Credit Facility will be sufficient to meet our liquidity requirements for at least the next 12 months. Our assets are illiquid by their nature. Thus, a timely liquidation of assets might not be a viable source of short-term liquidity should a cash flow shortfall arise that causes a need for additional liquidity. It could be necessary to source liquidity from other financing alternatives should any such scenario arise.
Our liquidity and capital resources as of September 30, 2013 consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $24.3 million, including $0.6 million held by designated brokers to facilitate the acquisition of properties.
On May 14, 2013, we completed our IPO of 13,700,000 shares of our common stock at an offering price of $21.00 per share, and we received approximately $265.1 million of net proceeds, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions, structuring fee and other offering expenses payable by us. Prior to completion of our IPO, $109.0 million was outstanding under the Original Credit Facility. Proceeds from the IPO were used to repay the outstanding balance.
In September 2013, we amended and restated the Original Credit Facility increasing our borrowing capacity from $150.0 million to $340.0 million, subject to meeting certain criteria. As of September 30, 2013, $170.0 million was outstanding under the Credit Facility, with remaining availability of $73.0 million. In the future, we expect to finance our operations, in part, with borrowings under the Credit Facility and with various other types of indebtedness. We may raise additional capital in the future through the sale of shares of our capital stock.
To date, we have not declared any distributions. To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we are required to distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, and to pay tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that we annually distribute less than 100% of our net taxable income. Subject to the requirements of the Maryland General Corporation Law, or the MGCL, we intend to pay quarterly dividends to our stockholders, if and to the extent authorized by our Board of Directors.
Operating Activities
Cash from operating activities is primarily dependent upon the number of owned properties, occupancy level of our portfolio, the rental rates specified in our leases, the collectibility of rent, the interest rates specified in our portfolio of private mortgage financings and the level of our operating expenses and general and administrative costs. Cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 increased $10.4 million to $9.1 million, compared to cash used in operating activities for the period March 30, 2012 (inception) to September 30, 2012 of $1.3 million. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, adjusted for depreciation and amortization, amortization of stock-based compensation, amortization of deferred financing costs and bad debt expense of $4.5 million, increased by $6.2 million compared to the period March 30, 2012 (inception) to September 30, 2012. The increase is primarily attributable to our increased portfolio size as we commenced operations in May 2012 and acquired our first properties in June 2012.


32


Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $517.7 million and was primarily the result of property acquisitions, renovations on newly acquired properties and additional investments in mortgage financing. We utilized $458.5 million for property acquisitions, including the purchase price and the value of any in-place leases, $14.5 million in capital improvements, of which $12.7 million was related to initial renovations on newly acquired properties and $1.8 million was related to capital improvements made to properties that had been previously occupied. The average purchase price for newly acquired properties was $125,870 for acquisitions that occurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The average renovation cost per home was $9,370 for acquisitions that occurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
We invested $48.9 million in mortgage financings, offset by $22.5 million in repayments of mortgage financings.
We incur costs to prepare our acquired properties to be rented. These costs (including direct internal costs) are capitalized and allocated to building costs. Costs related to the restoration or improvement of our properties (including direct internal costs, primarily comprised of payroll expense) that improve and extend their useful lives are also capitalized and allocated to building costs.
Cash used in investing activities for the period March 30, 2012 (inception) to September 30, 2012 was $88.2 million, primarily due to property acquisitions and investments in mortgage financings.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $431.3 million and was primarily attributable to proceeds of $288.5 million from the sale of shares of our common stock in our IPO, completed in May 2013, and private placement in January 2013, offset by $22.6 million in common stock issuance transaction costs related to our IPO, net borrowings of $170.0 million and deferred financing costs paid of $4.6 million related to the Original Credit Facility and the Credit Facility.
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. As a REIT, under federal income tax law we are required to distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income. Subject to the requirements of MGCL, we intend to pay quarterly dividends to our stockholders, if and to the extent authorized by our Board of Directors, which in the aggregate will approximately equal our REIT taxable income in the relevant year. As of September 30, 2013, no dividends have been declared.
Cash provided by financing activities for the period March 30, 2012 (inception) to September 30, 2012 of $208.7 million was attributable to proceeds of $223.9 million from the sale of shares of our common stock in the May 2012 initial private offering offset by $15.2 million in offering transaction costs.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no obligations, assets or liabilities which would be considered off-balance sheet arrangements. We have not participated in transactions that create relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, often referred to as variable interest entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual Obligations
During the first nine months of 2013, there were no material changes outside the ordinary course of business in the information regarding specified contractual obligations contained in our final prospectus dated May 8, 2013 and filed with the SEC on May 9, 2013.
The following table provides information with respect to our commitments as of September 30, 2013, including any guaranteed or minimum commitments under contractual obligations (amounts in thousands).
 
2013
 
2014
 
2015
 
2016
 
2017
 
Thereafter
 
Total
Debt obligations(1)
$

 
$

 
$
170,000

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
170,000

Interest payment obligations(2)
1,317

 
5,225

 
258

 

 

 

 
6,800

Operating lease(3)
97

 
600

 
612

 
623

 
$
635

 
647

 
3,214

Property acquisition obligations(4)
49,795

 

 

 

 

 

 
49,795

 
$
51,209

 
$
5,825

 
$
170,870

 
$
623

 
$
635

 
$
647

 
$
229,809

 
(1)
Represents amounts outstanding under our senior secured revolving credit facility.
(2)
Interest payment obligations were calculated using interest rates applicable as of September 30, 2013.

33


(3)
Includes operating lease for corporate office space at 7047 East Greenway Parkway, Scottsdale, Arizona
(4)
Represents purchase offers on single-family rental homes that were accepted by the sellers but not closed as of September 30, 2013. Acquisition deposits were paid through September 30, 2013 in connection with these rental home purchase commitments. There is no assurance that we will close on the properties we have under contract.
Funds From Operations
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) (which we believe is the most comparable GAAP measure) to funds from operations, or FFO. Also presented is information regarding the weighted-average number of shares of our common stock outstanding used for the basic and diluted computation per share (amounts in thousands, expect share and per-share amounts):
 
 
Three Months Ended 
 September 30,

Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,

Period from March 30, (inception) to September 30,
 
 
2013

2012

2013

2012
Net loss
 
$
(4,588
)

$
(2,428
)

$
(16,835
)

$
(3,611
)
Add: Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets
 
6,472


415


14,129


422

FFO
 
$
1,884


$
(2,013
)

$
(2,706
)

$
(3,189
)
FFO attributable to common stockholders (1)
 
$
1,854


$
(1,980
)

$
(2,668
)

$
(3,137
)
FFO per share of common stock, basic and diluted
 
$
0.06

 
$
(0.18
)
 
$
(0.10
)
 
$
(0.28
)
Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding:
 







Basic
 
32,124,857

 
11,199,757

 
25,447,193

 
11,199,757

Diluted (2)
 
32,682,307

 
11,199,757

 
25,819,293

 
11,199,757

 
(1)
Based on a weighted-average interest in our operating partnership of approximately 98.41% and 98.35%, for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and 98.61% and 98.37% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and the period from March 30, 2012 (inception) through September 30, 2012, respectively.
(2)
Assumes the issuance of potentially issuable shares unless the result would be anti-dilutive.
FFO is a widely recognized measure of REIT performance. We calculate FFO as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT. FFO represents net income (loss) (as computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains from disposition of property (but including impairments and provisions for losses on property held for sale), plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization (including capitalized leasing costs).
Management uses FFO as a supplemental performance measure because, in excluding real estate-related depreciation and amortization and gains from property dispositions, it accounts for trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs. We believe that, as a widely recognized measure of the performance of REITs, FFO will be used by investors as a basis to compare our operating performance with that of other REITs.
However, because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization and captures neither the changes in the value of our properties that result from use or market conditions nor the level of capital expenditures and leasing commissions necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, all of which have real economic effects and could materially impact our results of operations, the utility of FFO as a measure of our performance is limited. Other Equity REITs may not calculate FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition and, accordingly, our FFO may not be comparable to that of other REITs. As a result, FFO should be considered only as a supplement to net income (loss) as a measure of our performance. FFO should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including the Company’s ability to pay dividends or make distributions. FFO also should not be used as a supplement to or substitute for net income (loss) or net cash flows from operating activities (as computed in accordance with GAAP).
 
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent on prevalent market interest rates. Interest rates are highly sensitive to several factors, including governmental monetary policies, domestic and global economic and political conditions and other factors which are beyond our control. We may incur additional variable rate debt in the future, including additional amounts that we may borrow under the Credit Facility. In addition, decreases in interest rates may lead to additional competition for the acquisition of single-family homes and other real estate due to a reduction in attractive alternative income-producing investments. Increased competition for the acquisition of single-family homes may lead to future acquisitions being more costly and result in lower yields on single-family homes we have targeted for acquisition. In

34


such circumstances, if we are not able to offset the decrease in yields by obtaining lower interest costs on our borrowings, our results of operations will be adversely affected. Significant increases in interest rates may also have an adverse impact on our earnings if we are unable to acquire single-family homes with rental rates high enough to offset the increase in interest rates on our borrowings.
Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. We may in the future use derivative financial instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risks related to any borrowings we may have. We expect to enter into such contracts only with major financial institutions based on their credit rating and other factors.
As of September 30, 2013, $170.0 million was outstanding and $73.0 million was available under the Credit Facility. Amounts borrowed on the Credit Facility bear interest at variable rates based, at the Company's option, on LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 2.50% to 3.25% or a base rate plus a spread ranging from 1.50% to 2.25%, with each spread based on a ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value (each as defined in the credit agreement that governs the Credit Facility) ranging from less than or equal to 45% to greater than 55%. If interest rates on our outstanding balance of $170.0 million under the Credit Facility were to increase or decrease by 50 basis points, our interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $0.9 million, respectively.
 
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

35


PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
We are not involved in any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors as disclosed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 24 of our prospectus dated May 8, 2013 and filed with the SEC on May 9, 2013 pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
None.
Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
Our registration statement on Form S-11, as amended (Registration No. 333-187450) (the “Registration Statement”), with respect to our initial public offering (the “Offering”) of shares of our common stock, $0.01 par value per share, registered 15,755,000 shares to be sold by us, 500 shares to be sold by the sole selling stockholder and 12,842,040 shares to be sold by selling stockholders on a continuing basis following completion of the Offering and was declared effective by the SEC on May 8, 2013. We sold a total of 13,700,000 shares of our common stock in the Offering for gross proceeds of approximately $287.7 million. We did not receive any proceeds from the sale of 500 shares of our common stock and will not receive any proceeds from the sale of 12,842,040 shares of our common stock by the selling stockholders named in the Registration Statement. The Offering was completed on May 14, 2013. As of the date of filing this report, the Offering has terminated and all of the securities registered for sale by us pursuant to the Registration Statement have been sold. The joint book-running managers of the Offering were Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, FBR Capital Markets & Co. and Jefferies LLC. The co-managers of the Offering were Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and Zelman Partners LLC. The expenses of the Offering incurred by us were as follows (in millions):
 
Underwriting discounts and commissions
$
18.7

Structuring fee payable to certain of the underwriters
1.4

Expenses paid to or for our underwriters
0.3

Other expenses
2.2

Total underwriting discounts and expenses
$
22.6

All of the foregoing underwriting discounts and expenses were direct or indirect payments to persons other than: (i) our directors, officers or any of their associates; (ii) persons owning ten percent (10 percent) or more of our shares of common stock; or (iii) our affiliates.
The net proceeds to us of the Offering were approximately $265.1 million, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions, structuring fee and other offering expenses payable by us. Upon completion of the Offering, we contributed the net proceeds of the Offering to our Operating Partnership in exchange for common units of our Operating Partnership. We used approximately $109.0 million of the net proceeds to repay the outstanding balance under our senior secured revolving credit facility. As of September 30, 2013, we have used the remaining proceeds of $156.1 million to acquire, restore, lease and manage single-family homes as rental properties, to provide short-term private mortgage financing secured by interests in single-family homes and for general business purposes.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.

36


Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5.
Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6.
Exhibits
 
Exhibit No.
 
Description
 
 
 
3.1
 
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of American Residential Properties, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-187450), filed with the SEC on April 22, 2013)
 
 
 
3.2
 
Bylaws of American Residential Properties, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-187450), filed with the SEC on April 22, 2013)
 
 
 
3.3
 
Agreement of Limited Partnership of American Residential Properties OP, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-187450), filed with the SEC on April 22, 2013)
 
 
 
10.1
 
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2013, by and among American Residential Properties, Inc., American Residential Properties OP, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), American Residential GP, LLC and American Residential Properties TRS, LLC, as guarantors, American Residential Leasing Company, LLC, as the borrower, certain other subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report of Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 23, 2013)

 
 
 
10.2
 
Lender Joinder Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2013, by and among American Residential Properties, Inc., American Residential Properties OP, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), American Residential GP, LLC and American Residential Properties TRS, LLC, as guarantors, American Residential Leasing Company, LLC, as the borrower, certain other subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and Citibank N.A, as lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 3, 2013)

 
 
 
31.1*
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
 
 
31.2*
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
 
 
32.1**
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
32.2**
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
101.INS†
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
101.SCH†
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
 
101.CAL†
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.DEF†
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.LAB†
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.PRE†
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

37


*
Filed herewith.
**
Furnished herewith.
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

38


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC.
 
 
 
 
Date: November 14, 2013
By:
 
/s/ STEPHEN G. SCHMITZ
 
 
 
Stephen G. Schmitz
 
 
 
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
 
 
 
 
Date: November 14, 2013
By:
 
/s/ SHANT KOUMRIQIAN
 
 
 
Shant Koumriqian
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)


39


EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit No.
 
Description
 
 
 
3.1
 
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of American Residential Properties, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-187450), filed with the SEC on April 22, 2013)
 
 
 
3.2
 
Bylaws of American Residential Properties, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-187450), filed with the SEC on April 22, 2013)
 
 
 
3.3
 
Agreement of Limited Partnership of American Residential Properties OP, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-187450), filed with the SEC on April 22, 2013)
 
 
 
10.1
 
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2013, by and among American Residential Properties, Inc., American Residential Properties OP, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), American Residential GP, LLC and American Residential Properties TRS, LLC, as guarantors, American Residential Leasing Company, LLC, as the borrower, certain other subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report of Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 23, 2013)
 
 
 
10.2
 
Lender Joinder Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2013, by and among American Residential Properties, Inc., American Residential Properties OP, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), American Residential GP, LLC and American Residential Properties TRS, LLC, as guarantors, American Residential Leasing Company, LLC, as the borrower, certain other subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and Citibank N.A, as lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 3, 2013)
 
 
 
31.1*
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
 
 
31.2*
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
 
 
32.1**
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
32.2**
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
101.INS†
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
101.SCH†
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
 
101.CAL†
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.DEF†
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.LAB†
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.PRE†
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
*
Filed herewith.
**
Furnished herewith.
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.


40