Attached files

file filename
EX-3.3 - EX-3.3 - La Quinta Holdings Inc.d640354dex33.htm
EX-3.1 - EX-3.1 - La Quinta Holdings Inc.d640354dex31.htm
EX-23.6 - EX-23.6 - La Quinta Holdings Inc.d640354dex236.htm
EX-23.4 - EX-23.4 - La Quinta Holdings Inc.d640354dex234.htm
EX-23.3 - EX-23.3 - La Quinta Holdings Inc.d640354dex233.htm
EX-23.5 - EX-23.5 - La Quinta Holdings Inc.d640354dex235.htm
EX-23.8 - EX-23.8 - La Quinta Holdings Inc.d640354dex238.htm
EX-23.9 - EX-23.9 - La Quinta Holdings Inc.d640354dex239.htm
EX-23.7 - EX-23.7 - La Quinta Holdings Inc.d640354dex237.htm
EX-23.2 - EX-23.2 - La Quinta Holdings Inc.d640354dex232.htm
Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 10 , 2014

Registration No. 333-          

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

 

La Quinta Holdings Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   7011   90-1032961

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

 

909 Hidden Ridge, Suite 600

Irving, Texas 75038

(214) 492-6600

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

 

Mark M. Chloupek

Executive Vice President and General Counsel

909 Hidden Ridge, Suite 600

Irving, Texas 75038

(214) 492-6600

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 

 

With copies to:

 

Michael D. Nathan, Esq.

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

425 Lexington Avenue

New York, New York 10017

(212) 455-2000

 

Marc D. Jaffe, Esq.

Cathy A. Birkeland, Esq.

Latham & Watkins LLP

885 Third Avenue

New York, New York 10022-4834

(212) 906-1200

 

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement is declared effective.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box:  ¨

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   x  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

 

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

 

Title of each class of

securities to be registered

 

Proposed

maximum

aggregate
offering price(1)(2)

 

Amount of

registration fee

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

  $100,000,000   $12,880

 

 

 

(1)   This amount represents the proposed maximum aggregate offering price of the securities registered hereunder to be sold by the Registrant. These figures are estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
(2)   Includes offering price of shares of common stock that the underwriters have the option to purchase. See “Underwriting.”

 

 

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell nor do we seek an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

 

Subject to Completion. Dated February 10, 2014

                Shares

LOGO

La Quinta Holdings Inc.

Common Stock

This is an initial public offering of shares of common stock of La Quinta Holdings Inc. All of the shares of common stock are being sold by us.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for the common stock. It is currently estimated that the initial public offering price per share will be between $                 and $                . We intend to apply to list our common stock on                 under the symbol “                .”

After the completion of this offering, affiliates of The Blackstone Group L.P. will continue to own a majority of the voting power of all outstanding shares of our common stock. As a result, we will be a “controlled company.” See “Management—Controlled company exception” and “Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management.”

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined under the federal securities laws and, as such, may elect to comply with certain reduced public company reporting requirements for future filings. See “Prospectus summary—Implications of being an emerging growth company.”

See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 21 to read about factors you should consider before buying shares of our common stock.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

      Per share      Total  

Initial public offering price

   $                       $                   

Underwriting discounts and commissions

   $        $    

Proceeds, before expenses, to us(1)

   $         $     

 

 

 

(1)   See “Underwriting.”

To the extent that the underwriters sell more than             shares of common stock, the underwriters have the option to purchase up to an additional             shares of common stock from us at the initial public offering price less the underwriting discounts and commissions.

The underwriters expect to deliver the shares against payment in New York, New York on         , 2014.

 

J.P. Morgan   Morgan Stanley

Prospectus dated                 , 2014.


Table of Contents

Table of contents

Prospectus

 

     Page  

MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA

     i   

TRADEMARKS, SERVICE MARKS AND TRADENAMES

     i   

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

     i   

CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS

     ii   

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

     1   

THE OFFERING

     16   

SUMMARY HISTORICAL COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA

     17   

RISK FACTORS

     21   

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     56   

OUR PRE-IPO TRANSACTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

     58   

USE OF PROCEEDS

     60   

DIVIDEND POLICY

     61   

CAPITALIZATION

     62   

DILUTION

     64   

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION

     66   

SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA

     68   

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     71   

INDUSTRY

     108   

BUSINESS

     112   

MANAGEMENT

     132   

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

     146   

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

     148   

DESCRIPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS

     150   

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

     153   

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

     160   

CERTAIN UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME AND ESTATE TAX CONSEQUENCES TO NON-U.S. HOLDERS

     162   

UNDERWRITING

     166   

LEGAL MATTERS

     171   

EXPERTS

     171   

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

     172   

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     F-1   

 

 


Table of Contents

We have not authorized anyone to provide any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectuses we have prepared. We take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the shares of common stock offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information contained in this prospectus is current only as of its date.


Table of Contents

Market and industry data

Within this prospectus, we reference information and statistics regarding the hotel industry and various segments within such industry. We have obtained this information and statistics from various independent third-party sources, including independent industry publications, reports by market research firms and other independent sources. Smith Travel Research (“STR”) and PKF Hospitality Research, LLC (“PKF-HR”) are the primary sources for third-party market data and industry statistics and forecasts. STR does not guarantee the performance of any company about which it collects and provides data. Nothing in the STR or PKF-HR data should be construed as advice. We have also obtained information from surveys conducted by Temkin Group (“Temkin”). Some data and other information are also based on our good faith estimates, which are derived from our review of internal surveys and independent sources. We believe that these external sources and estimates are reliable, but have not independently verified them.

Trademarks, service marks and tradenames

We own or have rights to use a number of registered and common law trademarks, service marks and trade names in connection with our business in the United States and/or in certain foreign jurisdictions, including, but not limited to, “La Quinta,” “La Quinta Inn,” “La Quinta Inn & Suites,” “LQ Instant Hold,” “LQ” and “Returns.”

Solely for convenience, the trademarks, service marks, logos and trade names referred to in this prospectus are without the ® and ™ symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights or the rights of the applicable licensors to these trademarks, service marks and trade names. This prospectus contains additional trademarks, service marks and trade names of others, which are the property of their respective owners. All trademarks, service marks and trade names appearing in this prospectus are, to our knowledge, the property of their respective owners.

Basis of presentation

Prior to completion of this offering, we will effect the transactions (the “Pre-IPO Transactions”) described under “Our pre-IPO transactions and organizational structure.” Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all information in this prospectus reflects the consummation of the Pre-IPO Transactions and references in this prospectus to “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” refer to La Quinta Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, and references to “La Quinta Holdings Inc.” and the “Issuer” refer only to La Quinta Holdings Inc. exclusive of its subsidiaries, in each case after giving effect to the Pre-IPO Transactions.

As of September 30, 2013, 17 of our La Quinta-branded hotels were designated as assets held for sale and the results of their operations have been classified as discontinued operations (the “Hotels Designated for Sale”). Sales of 13 of these La Quinta hotels have already closed, and we expect that we will sell the remaining 4 hotels prior to the consummation of this offering.

Presentation of historical non-financial data and pro forma financial information.    Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, (i) operating and other non-financial data, including number of hotels and related data, disclosed in the sections of this prospectus other

 

i


Table of Contents

than the Financial Statement Sections (as defined below) and (ii) pro forma financial information in this prospectus:

 

 

reflects the combined and consolidated business and operations of the entities expected to be owned by the Company at the completion of this offering and previously under common control or otherwise consolidated for financial reporting purposes and their consolidated subsidiaries (the “Predecessor Entities”),

 

 

includes the 14 La Quinta hotels managed by the Predecessor Entities (the “Previously Managed Portfolio”) as owned hotels, which will be acquired by the Predecessor Entities at the time of the consummation of this offering (see “Our pre-IPO transactions and organizational structure”),

 

 

includes the Hotels Designated for Sale (with the Hotels Designated for Sale treated as discontinued operations in the pro forma financial information), and

 

 

excludes 11 Baymont-branded hotels (the “Baymont Hotels”) which we sold on August 8, 2013 (with the Baymont Hotels treated as discontinued operations in the pro forma financial information).

We expect to present our financial results following the completion of this offering in accordance with the basis of presentation for pro forma financial information as described above.

Presentation of combined financial information and certain other non-financial data.    Unless otherwise indicated, or the context otherwise requires, (i) the historical financial data (excluding all pro forma financial data) in this prospectus and (ii) the operating and other non-financial data (but excluding all related data prepared on a pro forma basis), including number of hotels and related data, disclosed in “Summary historical combined financial data,” “Selected financial and other data” and “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” (collectively, the “Financial Statement Sections”):

 

 

reflects the combined and consolidated business and operations of the Predecessor Entities,

 

 

treats the Previously Managed Portfolio as franchised and managed hotels,

 

 

excludes the Hotels Designated for Sale (other than as discontinued operations), and

 

 

excludes the Baymont Hotels (other than as discontinued operations).

Except where the context requires otherwise, the information in this prospectus assumes no exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase up to an additional             shares of common stock from us and that the shares of common stock to be sold in this offering are sold at $            per share, which is the mid-point of the price range indicated on the front cover of this prospectus.

Certain defined terms

The following are definitions of certain terms used in this prospectus:

 

 

“ADR” or “average daily rate” means hotel room revenues divided by total number of rooms sold in a given period;

 

ii


Table of Contents
 

“Blackstone” or “our Sponsor” means The Blackstone Group, L.P. and its affiliates;

 

 

“CAGR” means compound annual growth rate;

 

 

“Comfort” refers to Comfort Inns and Comfort Suites collectively;

 

 

“comparable hotels” means hotels that: (i) were active and operating in our system for at least one full calendar year as of the end of the applicable period and were active and operating as of January 1st of the previous year; and (ii) have not sustained substantial property damage, business interruption or for which comparable results are not available. Management uses comparable hotels as the basis upon which to evaluate ADR, occupancy, RevPAR and RevPAR Index on a company-wide basis and for each of our reportable segments;

 

 

“existing owners” refers to Blackstone and the members of our management that own, directly or indirectly, interests in the Predecessor Entities;

 

 

“franchised hotels” refers to La Quinta-branded hotels which are owned and operated by franchisees under franchise agreements with us;

 

 

“Hampton” refers to Hampton Inns and Hampton Inn & Suites collectively;

 

 

“main STR competitive set” refers to Comfort, Holiday Inn Express and/or Hampton, the brands most often included in our STR competitive sets;

 

 

“occupancy” means the total number of rooms sold in a given period divided by the total number of rooms available at a hotel or group of hotels;

 

 

“owned hotels” and “owned portfolio” refer to our hotels located on properties in which we have an ownership interest or leasehold interest;

 

 

“pipeline” means our portfolio of future La Quinta-branded hotels, each of which is represented by an executed franchise agreement;

 

 

“RevPAR” or “revenue per available room” means the product of the ADR charged and the average daily occupancy achieved;

 

 

“RevPAR Index” measures a hotel’s fair market share of its competitive set’s revenue per available room. It is stated as a percentage and is calculated for a hotel by comparing the hotel’s RevPAR to the aggregate RevPAR of a group of competing hotels generally in the same market; and when presented for a group of hotels is a weighted average of the individual hotel results. We subscribe to STR, which collects and compiles the data used to calculate RevPAR Index, and STR may calculate ADR and RevPAR differently than we and our competitors do. The owner of each La Quinta hotel exercises its discretion in identifying the competitive set of properties for such hotel, considering, subject to STR’s guidelines, such factors as physical proximity, competition for similar customers, services and amenities, quality and average daily rate. We initially review the competitive set makeup of each new hotel that enters our system and review the continuing appropriateness of each hotel’s competitive set on an ongoing basis;

 

 

“system-wide” refers collectively to our owned, franchised and managed hotel portfolios;

 

 

“team members” refers to our employees at our owned hotels and the employees of our franchisees at our franchised hotels;

 

iii


Table of Contents
 

“Temkin Experience Ratings” means the annual ranking by Temkin of U.S. companies in terms of customer experience based on a survey of approximately 10,000 U.S. customers regarding their recent interactions with such companies; and

 

 

“U.S. defined market tracts” refers to the 628 geographic areas or locations in the United States, compiled by STR, each of which is a subset of a geographic market.

 

iv


Table of Contents

Prospectus summary

This summary highlights certain significant aspects of our business and this offering. This is a summary of information contained elsewhere in this prospectus, is not complete and does not contain all of the information that you should consider before making your investment decision. You should carefully read the entire prospectus, including the information presented under the section entitled “Risk factors” and the combined financial statements and the notes thereto, before making an investment decision. This summary contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ significantly from future results contemplated in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors such as those set forth in “Risk factors” and “Special note regarding forward-looking statements.” When making an investment decision, you should also read the discussion under “Basis of presentation” above for the definition of certain terms used in this prospectus and a description of certain transactions and other matters described in this prospectus.

 

 

Company overview

We are a leading owner, operator and franchisor of select-service hotels primarily serving the midscale and upper-midscale segments under the La Quinta brand. Based on data provided by STR, La Quinta is the fastest growing principal select-service hotel brand in the United States in these segments in terms of percentage growth of number of hotels over the last ten years ended December 31, 2012, growing our total number of hotels from 362 in 2003 to 836 as of September 30, 2013, significantly outpacing the percentage growth of hotels franchised, owned and operated by Comfort, Holiday Inn Express and Hampton, the hotel brands one or more of which is most often included in our STR competitive sets, which we refer to as our “main STR competitive set.” Our system-wide portfolio, as of September 30, 2013, consisted of 836 hotels representing approximately 84,000 rooms located predominantly across 46 U.S. states, as well as in Canada and Mexico, of which 370 hotels were owned and operated and 466 were franchised. We also have a pipeline of 175 franchised hotels as of September 30, 2013, to be located in the United States, Mexico, Canada, Colombia and Honduras (80% of which represents new construction as opposed to the conversion of an existing hotel).

The following table illustrates the growth in number of our owned and franchised hotels from 2002 to September 30, 2013.

 

LOGO

 

(1)   Certain of our owned hotels were previously operated by us as non-La Quinta hotels and are not included in this table until such time as they were converted to La Quinta-branded hotels. From the Acquisition through September 30, 2013 and primarily in 2006, we converted 128 hotels.

 

 

1


Table of Contents

We primarily derive our revenues from owned hotel operations and fees generated from franchised and managed hotels. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we generated total revenue of $818.0 million, Adjusted EBITDA of $297.8 million and net income from continuing operations of $17.1 million, in each case, including the Previously Managed Portfolio as franchised and managed hotels. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA, see “Summary historical combined financial data.”

We are focused on providing clean and comfortable guest rooms at affordable prices in convenient locations, with approximately 23% of our hotels serving the upper-midscale segment, approximately 59% of our hotels serving the midscale segment, approximately 11% (principally our owned hotels) serving the economy segment and the balance serving the remaining segments. Our hotels have fewer costly services and amenities than full-service hotels, which we believe results in a highly efficient hotel-level cost structure. Our hotels typically include common areas with amenities such as a great room (including breakfast seating area, lobby with seating area and business center), swimming pool and vending areas and generally offer a complimentary breakfast. As of September 30, 2013, the hotels in our system consisted of 556 La Quinta Inn & Suites, which include guest suites and are generally our newer hotels, and 280 La Quinta Inns. Our guest mix includes both business and leisure travelers.

La Quinta was founded in San Antonio, Texas in 1968 and has a 45-year history of owning and operating hotels and, from 1973 to January 2006, we operated through our predecessors as a public company. In 2006, we were acquired by Blackstone (the “Acquisition”), who identified a strategic repositioning opportunity to improve the quality and performance of our owned portfolio, narrow the RevPar Index gap between us and our main STR competitive set and accelerate growth in our franchise business. RevPAR Index measures a hotel’s fair market share of its competitive set’s revenue per available room and is calculated by comparing the hotel’s RevPAR to the aggregate RevPAR of a group of competing hotels generally in the same market.

Our strategic repositioning plan included:

 

 

assembling a management team led by lodging industry and La Quinta veteran Wayne Goldberg;

 

 

investing capital into our owned real estate, brand and technology infrastructure;

 

 

prioritizing the growth of our franchise business and dedicating resources to existing and new domestic franchise markets;

 

 

establishing a franchising infrastructure in Mexico and Central America;

 

 

increasing the focus on operating efficiencies and revenue management within our owned portfolio;

 

 

consolidating operations around the La Quinta brand; and

 

 

increasing the marketing spend with a focus on differentiating the La Quinta brand and growing our loyalty program.

In connection with our strategic repositioning plan from the Acquisition through September 30, 2013, we have expanded our franchise system by approximately three times, growing from 158 franchised hotels to 466 franchised hotels, with an additional 175 hotels in our pipeline. Based on historical experience, converted hotels in our pipeline can generally become operational between

 

 

2


Table of Contents

12 to 18 months from the date of execution of the franchise agreement, and newly constructed hotels in our pipeline can generally become operational between 36 to 48 months from the date of execution of the franchise agreement. Openings may be delayed, or franchises canceled, for a number of factors, including economic conditions, weather and construction delays, and certain of our pipeline properties may not become operational.

Additionally, over the period from 2007 through September 30, 2013, we have:

 

 

invested a total of $728 million in capital, $301 million of which we consider repositioning capital which was invested to increase our RevPAR Index. Repositioning capital investments included $145 million for improvements across our owned hotel portfolio, including acceleration of some aspects of cycle renovations and $38 million for upgrades to our technology infrastructure. Repositioning capital also included over $75 million expended to upgrade the non-La Quinta hotels we converted to La Quinta-branded hotels after the Acquisition and $42 million to develop our flagship downtown Chicago property;

 

 

after experiencing a decrease in RevPAR Index of 340 basis points from 2006 to 2007, principally due to the conversion over that period of 128 non-La Quinta hotels to La Quinta-branded hotels, increased our system-wide RevPAR Index by over 1000 basis points to 99.2%;

 

 

sold (or are holding for sale) 33 La Quinta hotels, the effect of such sale was to improve our system-wide RevPAR and guest satisfaction scores for our remaining portfolio;

 

 

increased membership in our La Quinta Returns loyalty program by 138% from 3.7 million to 8.8 million members; and

 

 

improved guest satisfaction scores, currently ranking #2 among the 15 hotel chains surveyed in the 2013 Temkin Experience Ratings.

Additionally, following the industry-wide economic downturn that began in 2008, our operating performance has improved significantly over the past three years, during the strong lodging industry recovery that industry analysts believe will continue for the next several years. Specifically, we have:

 

 

increased our ADR 8.4% from $69.38 to $75.21 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2010;

 

 

increased our RevPAR 16.5% from $40.49 to $47.17 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2010; and

 

 

realized Adjusted EBITDA growth (including the Previously Managed Portfolio as franchised and managed hotels) of 37.0% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.

Although we believe we have been successful in implementing our strategic repositioning plan, we believe there remains significant opportunity for future growth:

 

 

There remains a meaningful ADR differential between us and the hotels in our main STR competitive sets, which we believe we can continue to decrease over time. We estimate that in 2012, each $1 increase in ADR across our owned portfolio would have increased our Adjusted EBITDA for our owned hotels by approximately $11 million, assuming all other variables remain constant.

 

 

3


Table of Contents
 

Our year-to-date 2013 Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margins for our owned portfolio remain below comparable 2008 metrics which we believe represents significant capacity for future organic growth at our hotels.

 

 

We remain approximately half the size of the hotel brands in our main STR competitive set in terms of number of hotels in the United States, which we believe provides for significant future expansion opportunity.

Our competitive strengths

We are driven by our core values and principles that we believe drive a high level of employee and guest engagement. Together with these core values and principles, we believe that the following competitive strengths position us to execute on our business plan and growth strategies.

 

 

Scalable and efficient business model with attractive cash flow characteristics.    Our hotel product offering is efficient, replicable and supported by a scalable operational, technological and administrative platform. Over 98% of our owned hotel revenue is derived solely from room rentals, as compared to 65% for full-service hotels, according to STR, and our operating margins in 2012 were 46% as compared to 30% for full-service hotels. As a select-service hotel brand, our hotels require fewer costly services, amenities and capital expenditures than full-service hotels, resulting in what we believe to be a highly efficient hotel-level cost structure, strong Adjusted EBITDA margins and stable cash flows. Even during the height of the recent economic downturn in 2009, our Adjusted EBITDA margins remained above 32% as compared to approximately 20% for full-service hotels, based on data provided by STR. In addition, our model enables us to manage corporate overhead expenses even though the number of our hotels, particularly the number of our franchised hotels, has increased substantially.

 

 

Established and rapidly growing franchise business.    Over the last ten years, we have grown our total number of franchised hotels from 56 in 2002 to 466 as of September 30, 2013, achieving a franchise compounded annual growth rate of 22%. Our franchise business requires little or no capital investment by us (which we refer to as “capital light”), and has substantial scale and an established infrastructure that we believe positions us to achieve meaningful franchise growth as development capital for franchisees continues to become more available. The hotels in our franchise portfolio have an average age of 13 years, with 40% of our franchise portfolio less than 5 years old. Despite the strong decade of growth, we are still less than half the size of our main STR competitive set, allowing room for continued aggressive franchise growth in a number of under-penetrated U.S. markets. As of September 30, 2013, we have a large pipeline of 175 franchised hotels (of which 80% are new construction), each represented by an executed franchise agreement, which upon completion would represent a 38% expansion of our total existing franchise system. Given our founding and significant presence in Texas, our presence in the U.S. southern border states and our established brand history with travelers from this region, we believe La Quinta has significant brand awareness in Mexico and believe Mexico, Central America and South America provide opportunities for significant franchise growth internationally where we have laid the foundation for expansion. Additionally, as our franchise business continues to grow, we expect cash flow from this segment will comprise a higher percentage of our total cash flow. Given that the average remaining term of our existing franchise contracts is approximately 14 years, we believe that our existing franchisees provide a long-term stable income stream. Moreover, we anticipate

 

 

4


Table of Contents
 

our franchise revenues will grow over time as new franchise agreements and renewals of existing franchise agreements are executed at our newly published rates, which include a 4.5% royalty fee, which is higher than the 4.0% royalty fee generally applicable to our franchise agreements currently in effect.

 

 

Widely recognized and differentiated brand.    We own, operate and franchise all of our hotels under a single brand, La Quinta, a highly recognizable brand in the select-service market, established over a 45-year history. We also ranked #2 among the 15 hotel chains surveyed in the 2013 Temkin Experience Ratings. Additionally, we have a loyal base of customers and a growing loyalty program, La Quinta Returns, with nearly nine million members as of September 30, 2013. We believe the capital investments we have made to upgrade and reposition our brand and hotel experience have helped to improve our brand awareness, brand perception, guest loyalty and guest experience. Our improved guest experience, brand perception and growing loyalty have contributed to consistent market share increases as reflected by our RevPAR Index growth. We believe that the demonstrated strength of our brand and loyal customer base drive revenues for our existing owned and franchised hotels and also makes us attractive to new franchisees.

 

 

Owner and operator business model promotes alignment with our franchisees.    Our position as an owner and operator of La Quinta-branded hotels creates an alignment of economic interest with our franchisees, which we believe is a differentiating factor among our competitors. We are focused on delivering value to our guests, which generates repeat stays and increases guest loyalty. Delivering value combined with the benefits of an increasing market presence through our growth in the number of hotels has strengthened our brand. We believe this focus and the powerful alignment with our franchisees drive strong operating results and financial returns which benefit both us and our franchisees and will continue to benefit and grow our business in the future. We have an active advisory Brand Council that includes both Company and franchisee representation and meets three to four times a year to discuss ways to improve the performance of our hotels. Through the Brand Council, we often test new concepts at both owned and franchised hotels, which we believe promotes collaboration between us and our franchisees. We believe our model incentivizes franchisees to invest in growing the La Quinta brand through additional capital investment into existing franchised hotels and through the development of new La Quinta hotels.

 

 

Highly experienced and successful management team.    Our management team has extensive experience in hospitality, consumer-facing and brand-based companies, with a proven track record for delivering strong results. Our executive management team has an average industry tenure of 19 years, including Wayne Goldberg with 34 years of select-service experience, Rajiv Trivedi, our Chief Development Officer, with 23 years of industry experience and Angelo Lombardi, our Chief Operating Officer, with 24 years of industry experience. In addition, Keith Cline, our Chief Financial Officer, who joined our executive management team in January 2013, brings over 21 years of finance, accounting and brand experience, including over 12 years of public company experience. Management has developed a culture of strong collaboration and teamwork that runs throughout the organization and has contributed to La Quinta’s successful performance.

 

 

5


Table of Contents

Our strategies

The following are key elements of our strategy to become the preferred select-service brand for our guests and franchise partners.

 

 

Take advantage of our significant capital investment to optimize the performance of our owned hotels.    We will continue to focus on maximizing revenues and managing costs at each of our owned hotels where we have updated our guest rooms to generally include a 32” flat panel high definition television, pillow-top mattresses, a large work desk with an ergonomic “task” chair, high speed internet access, a coffee maker, high-flow shower heads and curved shower rods. As of September 30, 2013, we had 370 owned hotels, representing 44% of our system-wide portfolio. We intend to drive revenue growth by employing our active revenue management strategies and increasing our ADR, share of hotel stays by return guests, membership in our Returns program, overall brand awareness and volume of our corporate guests. There is currently a meaningful ADR differential between us and the hotels in our main STR competitive sets. We believe the significant amount of capital we have spent since 2007 to reposition and improve the brand and the quality of our hotels, the growth in the number of hotel units in our system and the resulting increased brand awareness will allow us to continue to increase ADR. We estimate that in 2012 each $1 increase in ADR across our owned portfolio would have increased our Adjusted EBITDA for our owned hotels by approximately $11 million, assuming all other variables remained constant. We further expect to continue to enhance the profitability of our owned hotels by maximizing cost efficiencies through disciplined cost control and focusing on operational enhancements.

 

 

Continue to aggressively grow our capital light franchise business both domestically and internationally.    A primary element of our growth strategy is to continue to grow the number of units in our higher margin, scalable franchise fee-based business. As of September 30, 2013, we had 466 franchised hotels, representing 56% of our system-wide portfolio. Additionally, we have a large pipeline of 175 franchised hotels, 80% of which represents new construction, rather than the conversion of an existing hotel. We believe that there remains meaningful opportunity for continued growth in the United States, with La Quinta under-penetrated in many of the markets served by our main STR competitive set, including the Northeast and Northwest. For example, we are represented in 63% of the 628 U.S. defined market tracts and have an average 2.08 hotels in such represented markets, whereas the hotel brands of our main STR competitive set are represented in over 90% of such market tracts and have an average 3.07 hotels in our represented markets. We also intend to add new domestic franchised hotels in highly populated urban locations to serve a wider group of guests and increase brand awareness. We believe the opportunity for franchise growth in Mexico, Central America and South America is significant given our existing infrastructure, established brand history with travelers from these regions and our presence in the U.S. southern border states and Mexico. We have dedicated franchise and sales personnel who are focused exclusively on our franchise operations in these regions. As of September 30, 2013, we had 22 hotels either open or in the pipeline and continue to explore other franchise opportunities in these international markets.

 

 

Continue to increase La Quinta brand awareness.    We will continue to invest in marketing and brand building in order to increase awareness and differentiation of the La Quinta brand to improve hotel performance in our owned and franchised hotels and attract new La Quinta franchisees. We are able to concentrate our marketing and advertising efforts under a single brand rather than spreading them across multiple brands, which we believe enhances our

 

 

6


Table of Contents
 

ability to raise awareness of La Quinta hotels. Our owned and franchised hotels contribute 2.5% of gross room revenues to our Brand Marketing Fund (“BMF”) to support our marketing and build the brand and, from 2007 to the twelve month period ended September 30, 2013, total contributions to our BMF have grown 26% to $38.3 million, and, for the twelve months ended September 30, 2013, 46% of contributions to the BMF, or $17.7 million, were funded by our franchisees. We expect amounts available in the BMF and the percentage of such amounts contributed by our franchisees to continue to grow as the number of hotels in the La Quinta system grows and the performance of our hotels continues to improve. We will seek to continue to expand existing relationships and develop new relationships with franchise owners who demonstrate an ability to provide an excellent guest experience and maintain our brand standards, and who can broaden our reach into existing and under penetrated markets. We will continue to focus on growing our loyal customer base by increasing the membership in La Quinta Returns, our loyalty program designed to increase stays and raise market share. Our nearly nine million La Quinta Returns members as of September 30, 2013 (representing growth of 138% in membership since January 1, 2008) generated 47% of room revenues at our owned and franchised hotels for the twelve months ended September 30, 2013 (representing a 113% increase in room revenue contribution at owned and franchised hotels since 2008). In 2011, we introduced our “Taking Care of Business” national advertising campaign, featuring points of differentiation and the role of people and service in delighting our guests with our “Here For You” branded guest experience. We will continue to test media, technology, social platforms and email campaigns to find new ways to strengthen our brand.

 

 

Expand distribution channels and grow corporate accounts.    In 2012, revenues from bookings made through our website increased by 11%, while total electronic distribution revenues increased 15%, each as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. In addition, we launched a new mobile site and introduced our new LQ Instant Hold feature (patent pending), which permits our guests to use a mobile application to hold a room for up to 4 hours from any smart device by just entering a phone number. We will continue to develop our online and mobile channels in an effort to use lower cost, proprietary distribution channels. We will also seek to grow our market share by establishing new online relationships as new technologies and platforms are introduced. La Quinta is also well recognized in the corporate community and, for the twelve months ended September 30, 2013, corporate accounts, including government and military accounts, generated 25% of room revenue at our owned and franchised hotels. We will seek to increase room revenues from corporate accounts, as we believe such accounts are associated with more consistent demand and longer stays.

Our industry—the select-service segment

Select-service hotels generally serve the midscale and upper-midscale chain segments as defined by STR. Select-service hotels typically have fewer costly services and amenities than full-service hotels, which results in a highly efficient hotel-level cost structure. Select-service hotels typically have limited food and beverage outlets and do not offer comprehensive business or banquet facilities. Hotels in the midscale segment had an average ADR of $74.57 in 2012, and hotels in the upper-midscale segment had an average ADR of $97.38 in 2012. As of October 31, 2013, the midscale and upper-midscale segments collectively represent 1,348,514 rooms, or 27.4% of the overall U.S. lodging industry.

 

 

7


Table of Contents

The midscale and upper-midscale segments tend to follow the cyclicality of the overall lodging industry and have also improved with the economic recovery in recent years. According to data provided by STR for the lodging industry, demand for the U.S. midscale and upper-midscale segments has improved, experiencing a CAGR of 4.9% over the three years ended December 31, 2012, while U.S. midscale and upper-midscale supply has grown at a CAGR of 0.6%. This recent demand growth has exceeded the CAGR of 1.3% over the ten years ended December 31, 2012, while supply growth has trended lower than the CAGR of 0.9% over the ten years ended December 31, 2012. We believe this positive imbalance between demand growth and supply growth, together with the economic recovery, has contributed to a RevPAR CAGR of 6.3% over the three years ended December 31, 2012, well above the CAGR of 3.0% over the ten years ended December 31, 2012. We believe that the fundamentals of the U.S. lodging industry in the midscale and upper-midscale segments will yield strong industry segment performance and support the growth of our business. According to PKF-HR, total U.S. midscale/upper-midscale segment RevPAR is expected to increase approximately 5.5% in 2014 and between 6.0% and 7.1% in 2015.

For a further discussion of our industry, see “Industry.”

Our sponsor

Blackstone (NYSE: BX) is one of the world’s leading investment and advisory firms. Blackstone’s alternative asset management businesses include the management of corporate private equity funds, real estate funds, hedge fund solutions, credit-oriented funds and closed-end mutual funds. Blackstone also provides various financial advisory services, including financial and strategic advisory, restructuring and reorganization advisory and fund placement services. Through its different businesses, Blackstone had total assets under management of approximately $248 billion as of September 30, 2013. Blackstone’s global real estate group is the largest private equity real estate manager in the world with $69 billion of investor capital under management as of September 30, 2013.

Investment risks

An investment in shares of our common stock involves substantial risks and uncertainties that may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and cash flows. Some of the more significant challenges and risks relating to an investment in our Company include, among other things, the following:

 

 

We are subject to the business, financial, and operating risks inherent to the hospitality industry, any of which could reduce profits and limit opportunities for growth.

 

 

Macroeconomic and other factors beyond our control can adversely affect and reduce demand for rooms at hotels that we own or franchise.

 

 

Contraction in the global economy or low levels of economic growth could adversely affect our revenues and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth.

 

 

Because we operate in a highly competitive industry, our revenues or profits could be harmed if we are unable to compete effectively.

 

 

Any deterioration in the quality or reputation of our brand could have an adverse impact on our reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations.

 

 

8


Table of Contents
 

Some of our existing development pipeline may not be developed into La Quinta hotels, which could materially adversely affect our growth prospects.

 

 

Our hotels are geographically concentrated, with 25% of our hotel rooms located in Texas, which exposes our business to the effects of regional events and occurrences.

 

 

Our efforts to develop, redevelop or renovate our hotels could be delayed or become more expensive, which could reduce profits or impair our ability to compete effectively.

 

 

Our business is capital intensive and the failure to make necessary investments could adversely affect the quality and reputation of our brand.

 

 

The hospitality industry is subject to seasonal and cyclical volatility, which may contribute to fluctuations in our financial condition and results of operations.

 

 

If our franchisees are unable to access the capital necessary to implement plans for growth, including our existing pipeline, our revenues may be reduced and our ability to compete effectively may be diminished.

 

 

If we are unable to maintain good relationships with our franchisees, revenues could decrease and we may be unable to expand our presence.

 

 

Franchise agreement standards are important to protecting our brand reputation and perception, and if our franchisees fail to make investments necessary to maintain or improve their hotels, guest preference for the La Quinta brand and reputation could suffer or the franchise agreements with those parties could terminate.

 

 

If our franchisees are unable to repay or refinance loans secured by the mortgaged hotels, our revenues, profits and capital resources could be reduced and our business could be harmed.

 

 

We are exposed to the risks resulting from significant investments in owned real estate, which could increase our costs, reduce our profits and limit our ability to respond to market conditions.

 

 

Changes in local market or neighborhood conditions may diminish the value of real property.

 

 

Failure to keep pace with developments in technology could adversely affect our operations or competitive position.

 

 

Failures in, material damage to, or interruptions in our information technology systems, software or websites and difficulties in updating our existing software or developing or implementing new software could have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations.

 

 

We may be exposed to risks and costs associated with protecting the integrity and security of our guests’ personal information.

 

 

Any failure to protect our trademarks and other intellectual property could reduce the value of our brand and harm our business.

 

 

The loss of senior executives or key field personnel could significantly harm our business.

 

 

As of September 30, 2013, our total indebtedness was approximately $2.80 billion. Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition, our ability to raise

 

 

9


Table of Contents
 

additional capital to fund our operations, our ability to operate our business, our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry and our ability to pay our debts. Our substantial indebtedness could also expose us to interest rate risk to the extent of our variable debt and divert our cash flow from operations to make debt payments. Additionally, all of our debt currently matures in July 2014. We do not expect to have sufficient cash on hand to repay in full the balances expected to exist at that time. As such, we intend to refinance our current debt facilities prior to or concurrently with the consummation of this offering, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so on favorable terms or at all.

 

 

Following this offering, our Sponsor will beneficially own approximately     % of our common stock (or     % if the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase additional shares), and their interests may conflict with ours or yours in the future.

 

 

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the              rules and, as a result, will qualify for, and intend to rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements, including the requirement that a majority of the directors on our board be independent and the requirement that we have a compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee each composed entirely of independent directors. Accordingly, you will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of                 .

 

 

Following the completion of this offering, our Sponsor, certain of our directors and officers and other existing owners will hold approximately                  shares of our common stock. Future sales or the possibility of future sales of a substantial amount of these shares may depress the price of our common stock.

Please see “Risk factors” for a discussion of these and other factors you should consider before making an investment in shares of our common stock.

Implications of being an emerging growth company

As a company with less than $1.0 billion in revenue during our most recently completed fiscal year as of the initial filing date of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, we qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). As an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of specified reduced disclosure and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies that are not emerging growth companies. These provisions include:

 

 

Reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements;

 

 

No non-binding shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation or golden parachute arrangements; and

 

 

Exemption from the auditor attestation requirement in the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting.

We may take advantage of these exemptions for up to five years or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company. We will cease to be an emerging growth company upon the earliest of: (i) the end of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of this offering,

 

 

10


Table of Contents

(ii) the first fiscal year after our annual gross revenues are $1.0 billion or more, (iii) the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities or (iv) the end of any fiscal year in which the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeded $700 million as of the end of the second quarter of that fiscal year. We have taken advantage of reduced disclosure regarding executive compensation arrangements in this prospectus, and we may choose to take advantage of some but not all of these reduced disclosure obligations in future filings. If we do, the information that we provide stockholders may be different than you might get from other public companies in which you hold stock.

The JOBS Act permits an emerging growth company such as us to take advantage of an extended transition period to comply with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies. We are choosing to “opt out” of this provision and, as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards as required when they are adopted. This decision to opt out of the extended transition period under the JOBS Act is irrevocable.

 

 

11


Table of Contents

Our corporate structure

Our business is currently conducted, and our hotel properties are currently owned, through multiple entities (including the Predecessor Entities and entities that own the Previously Managed Portfolio, collectively, the “Existing Entities”). The Existing Entities are separately owned (directly and indirectly) by certain investment funds affiliated with our Sponsor and certain members of our management, whom we refer to collectively as our “existing owners,” and certain of the Existing Entities operated as real estate investment trusts, or REITs, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which reduced the amount of taxes we owed. La Quinta Holdings Inc. is a newly incorporated entity currently owned by our existing owners. The chart below summarizes the current corporate structure of the Existing Entities before giving effect to the Pre-IPO Transactions:

LOGO

 

 

12


Table of Contents

In order to effectuate this offering, we expect to effect a series of transactions to occur at various times prior to and/or concurrently with the closing of this offering that will result in a reorganization of our business (the “Pre-IPO Transactions”), which will subsequently be owned by La Quinta Holdings Inc. and will allow us to complete a public offering of all of the business historically conducted by the Existing Entities. Specifically, (i) Holdco III will purchase the membership interests in an entity that owns, directly or indirectly, the Previously Managed Portfolio, (ii) the equity interests in Holdco I, Holdco II and Holdco III (the “Holdcos”) held by the existing owners will be exchanged by the existing owners for shares of common stock of the Issuer, and (iii) LQ Management L.L.C. will be sold to a subsidiary of Holdco I for cash. Additionally, all of the shares of capital stock held by third-party shareholders of the Existing Entities that are REITs will be redeemed for cash and the REITs will be converted into limited liability companies. Following this offering, neither we nor any of our subsidiaries will operate as a REIT, and we will be taxed as a “C” corporation at the federal and state level.

 

 

13


Table of Contents

The chart below summarizes our corporate structure after giving effect to this offering and the Pre-IPO Transactions:

LOGO

 

(1)   See “Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management” for share ownership of Sponsor and certain members of our management following the Pre-IPO Transactions.

 

(2)   Ownership percentages assume an initial public offering price of $         per share, which is the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus.

For a further discussion of the Pre-IPO Transactions, see “Our Pre-IPO transactions and organizational structure.”

 

 

14


Table of Contents

Corporate history and information

La Quinta Holdings Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on December 9, 2013. Our principal executive offices are located at 909 Hidden Ridge, Suite 600, Irving, Texas 75038, and our telephone number is (214) 492-6600. We maintain a website at www.lq.com. The information contained on our website or that can be accessed through our website neither constitutes part of this prospectus nor is incorporated by reference herein.

 

 

15


Table of Contents

The offering

 

Common stock offered by us

                shares.

 

Option to purchase additional shares of common stock from us

                shares.

 

Common stock outstanding after giving effect to this offering

                shares (                 shares if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares in full).

 

Use of proceeds

We estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and offering expenses, will be approximately $            , based on an assumed initial public offering price of $             per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus.

 

  We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to repay certain of our indebtedness, with any remaining balance to be used for general corporate purposes. See “Use of proceeds.”

 

Dividend policy

We will determine our initial dividend policy prior to consummation of this offering. Any future decision to declare and pay dividends will be made at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, cash requirements, financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

 

Risk factors

See “Risk factors” and other information included in this prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully consider before deciding to invest in our common stock.

 

Proposed ticker symbol

“                    .”

 

 

The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after giving effect to this offering is based on                 shares of common stock to be outstanding immediately after giving effect to the Pre-IPO Transactions and assumes an initial public offering price of $                 per share, which is the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus.

In this prospectus, unless otherwise indicated, the number of shares of common stock outstanding and the other information based thereon does not reflect:

 

 

                shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of common stock from us; or

 

 

                shares of common stock that may be granted under our Omnibus Incentive Plan. See “Management—Executive compensation—Omnibus incentive plan.”

 

 

16


Table of Contents

Summary historical combined financial data

The following table sets forth summary financial and operating data on a historical basis and on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the Pre-IPO Transactions and the application of the net proceeds of this offering.

Our historical financial statements were prepared by combining the financial results of the entities expected to be owned by the Company at the completion of this offering, including those entities under common control and their consolidated subsidiaries. The historical financial information below does not include the acquisition of the Previously Managed Portfolio and does not include the Hotels Designated for Sale and the Baymont Hotels (other than the information relating to discontinued operations). We derived the summary statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 and the summary balance sheet data as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 from the audited combined financial statements of the Predecessor Entities included elsewhere in this prospectus. We derived the summary balance sheet data as of December 31, 2010 from the audited combined financial statements of the Predecessor Entities not included elsewhere in this prospectus. We derived the summary statement of operations data for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and the summary consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 from the unaudited condensed combined financial statements of the Predecessor Entities included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have prepared the unaudited condensed combined financial statements on the same basis as the audited combined financial statements and, in our opinion, have included all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly in all material respects our financial position and results of operations. The results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. Additionally, historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for any future period. You should read the table below, together with the combined financial statements including the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, as well as “Selected financial and other data,” “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” and “Description of indebtedness,” and the other financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus.

The summary unaudited pro forma combined financial data for the year ended December 31, 2013 is derived from our unaudited pro forma financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus and is presented as if this offering and the Pre-IPO Transactions (including the acquisition of the Previously Managed Portfolio) all had occurred on December 31, 2013 for the purposes of the unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet and on January 1, 2013 for the purposes of the unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations. The summary unaudited pro forma combined financial data reflects the acquisition of the Previously Managed Portfolio and excludes the Hotels Designated for Sale and the Baymont Hotels (other than the information relating to discontinued operations). The summary unaudited pro forma combined financial data is not necessarily indicative of the actual financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2013 or what the actual results of operations of the Company would have been assuming this offering and our Pre-IPO Transactions had been completed on the first day of the period presented, nor for the period presented is it indicative of the results of operations of future periods. See “Unaudited pro forma financial information” for a complete description of the adjustments and assumptions underlying the summary unaudited pro forma combined data.

 

 

17


Table of Contents
(in thousands)  

Pro forma as of
and for the
year ended
December 31,

2013

    As of and for the
nine months ended
September 30,
    As of and for the year ended
December 31
 
    2013     2012     2012     2011     2010  

 

 

Statement of Operations Data:

           

Revenues:

           

Room revenues

  $                           $ 585,294      $ 552,459      $ 714,143      $ 660,816      $ 623,720   

Franchise and other fee-based revenues

      59,846        52,054        69,206        59,314        52,074   

Other hotel revenues

      13,650        12,655        17,506        16,229        16,821   
 

 

 

 
      658,790        617,168        800,855        736,359        692,615   

Brand marketing fund revenues from franchised and managed properties

      14,594        13,139        17,157        15,182        13,238   
 

 

 

 

Total revenues

      673,384        630,307        818,012        751,541        705,853   

Operating Expenses:

           

Direct lodging expenses

      264,208        251,552        334,394        330,205        305,856   

Depreciation and amortization

      122,694        116,501        155,879        149,356        141,708   

General and administrative expenses

      49,724        50,575        74,111        61,578        63,828   

Other lodging and operating expenses

      39,666        36,448        58,266        47,791        49,623   

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses

      54,226        44,475        48,610        45,580        42,516   
 

 

 

 
      530,518        499,551        671,260        634,510        603,531   

Brand marketing fund expenses from franchised and managed properties

      14,594        13,139        17,157        15,182        13,238   
 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

      545,112        512,690        688,417        649,692        616,769   
 

 

 

 

Operating Income

      128,272        117,617        129,595        101,849        89,084   

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

      18,583        44,543        20,223        61,027        80,592   

Income from continuing operations, net of tax

      16,057        42,637        17,088        58,695        78,133   

Net Income (loss)

  $        $ 9,754      $ 42,014      $ (35,764   $ 58,939      $ 65,983   

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

      (1,106     4,233        4,810        4,574        2,845   
 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company

  $        $ 8,648      $ 46,247      $ (30,954   $ 63,513      $ 68,828   

Selected Balance Sheet Data:

           

Cash and cash equivalents

  $        $ 48,954      $ 39,447      $ 40,813      $ 90,857      $ 41,139   

Restricted cash

      136,596        127,497        113,407        60,745        61,243   

Total assets

      3,273,947        3,443,832        3,356,320        3,484,232        3,494,905   

Total debt(1)

      2,799,743        2,906,095        2,899,965        3,158,409        3,320,829   

Total equity (deficit)

      312,545        381,312        303,385        183,095        39,597   

 

 

 

 

18


Table of Contents
(in thousands)  

Pro forma as of
and for the
year ended
December 31,

2013

    As of and for the
nine months ended
September 30,
    As of and for the year ended
December 31
 
    2013     2012     2012     2011     2010  

 

 

Summary Statement of Cash Flows Data:

           

Capital expenditures

  $                           $ (82,979   $ (67,896   $ (102,886   $ (95,552   $ (69,606

Cash flow from operating activities

      193,019        210,700        248,187        220,429        200,777   

Cash flow from investing activities

      (38,867     (133,258     (150,952     (92,446     (82,673

Cash flow from financing activities

      (146,011     (128,852     (147,279     (78,265     (118,128

Operating Data (based on comparable hotels)(2):

           

Number of hotels

      772        757        756        719        670   

Number of rooms

      78,116        76,743        76,688        73,639        70,081   

Hotel occupancy

      66.4%        65.1%        63.5%        61.9%        59.6%   

Hotel ADR

  $        $ 79.71      $ 76.08      $ 75.66      $ 72.14      $ 69.50   

Hotel RevPAR

  $        $ 52.90      $ 49.50      $ 48.05      $ 44.67      $ 41.39   

Adjusted EBITDA(3)

  $        $ 256,215      $ 240,018      $ 297,823      $ 258,389      $ 229,966   

 

 

 

(1)   Includes current portion.

 

(2)   Operating data are for comparable hotels on a system-wide basis as of each period end. See the definition of comparable hotels in “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—Key indicators of financial condition and operating performance—Comparable hotels.”

 

(3)   EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA.     Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) is a commonly used measure in many industries. We adjust EBITDA when evaluating our performance because we believe that the adjustment for certain items, such as impairment charges, discontinued operations, gains (losses) on asset sales, certain financing costs, non-cash equity-based compensation, and other items not indicative of ongoing operating performance, provides useful supplemental information to management and investors regarding our ongoing operating performance. We believe that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide useful information to investors about us and our financial condition and results of operations for the following reasons: (i) EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are among the measures used by our management team to evaluate our operating performance and make day-to-day operating decisions; and (ii) EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are frequently used by securities analysts, investors, lenders, and other interested parties as a common performance measure to compare results or estimate valuations across companies in our industry.

 

     EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not recognized terms under GAAP, have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered either in isolation or as a substitute for net income (loss), cash flow or other methods of analyzing our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

 

   

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

 

   

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect our interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our indebtedness;

 

   

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect our tax expense or the cash requirements to pay our taxes;

 

   

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect historical cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

 

   

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the impact on earnings or changes resulting from matters that we consider not to be indicative of our future operations;

 

   

Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and

 

   

Other companies in our industry may calculate EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA differently, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures.

 

     Because of these limitations, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as discretionary cash available to us to reinvest in the growth of our business or as measures of cash that will be available to us to meet our obligations.

 

 

19


Table of Contents
     The following table provides a reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net income attributable to the Company, which we believe is the most closely comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure:

 

(in thousands)    Pro forma for
the year ended
December 31, 2013
     For the nine
months ended
September 30,
    For the year ended
December 31,
 
      2013     2012     2012     2011     2010  

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to the Company

   $                                         $ 8,648      $ 46,247      $ (30,954   $ 63,513      $ 68,828   

Interest expense

        110,908        67,042        103,342        51,986        50,641   

Income tax expense

        2,573        2,019        3,283        2,472        2,588   

Depreciation and amortization

        128,711        127,435        172,787        165,295        155,242   

Non-controlling interest

        1,106        (4,233     (4,810     (4,574     (2,845

EBITDA

        251,946        238,510        243,648        278,692        274,454   

Fixed asset impairment loss

                      53,228               11,612   

Impairment loss

        19,913        1,574                        

Income from discontinued operations

        (8,420     (9,057     (12,723     (13,543     (12,304

(Gain) Loss on sale from discontinued operations

        (7,694                            

Loss on retirement of assets

        47        155        1,562        2,168        495   

(Gain) Loss related to casualty disasters

        (2,611     (1,329     4,730        (3,447     (1,297

Gain on extinguishment of debt, net

               (1,192     (1,192     (11,451     (40,494

Management bonus related to debt amendment

               4,932        4,932                 

Financing costs expensed as incurred

               7,749        7,749        1,668          

Other (gains) losses, net

        3,034        (1,324     (4,111     (850     (2,500

Termination of long-term contract

                             5,152          

Adjusted EBITDA

   $         $ 256,215      $ 240,018      $ 297,823      $ 258,389      $ 229,966   

 

 

 

 

20


Table of Contents

Risk factors

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider each of the following risks as well as the other information included in this prospectus, including “Selected financial and other data,” “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” and our combined financial statements and related notes, before investing in our common stock. Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In such a case, the trading price of the common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment in the Company. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this “Risk factors” section to “our hotels,” “our rooms” and similar phrases refer to hotels that we own or franchise.

Risks related to our business and industry

We are subject to the business, financial, and operating risks inherent to the hospitality industry, any of which could reduce profits and limit opportunities for growth.

Our business is subject to a number of business, financial and operating risks inherent to the hospitality industry, including:

 

 

changes in operating costs, including energy, food, compensation, benefits, insurance and unanticipated costs resulting from force majeure events;

 

 

increases in costs due to inflation that may not be fully offset by price and fee increases in our business;

 

 

changes in taxes and governmental regulations that influence or set wages, prices, interest rates or construction and maintenance procedures and costs;

 

 

the costs and administrative burdens associated with complying with applicable laws and regulations;

 

 

the costs or desirability of complying with local practices and customs;

 

 

significant increases in cost for health care coverage for employees and potential government regulation with respect to health coverage, such as costs associated with the implementation of the requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act;

 

 

shortages of labor or labor disruptions;

 

 

the availability and cost of capital necessary for us and our franchisees to fund investments, capital expenditures and service debt obligations;

 

 

delays in or cancellations of planned or future development or renovation projects;

 

 

the quality of services provided by franchisees;

 

 

the financial condition of franchisees;

 

 

relationships with franchisees, including the risk that our franchise agreements may be terminated early;

 

 

changes in desirability of particular geographic locations and shortages of desirable locations for development;

 

21


Table of Contents
 

changes in lodging preferences and travel patterns of our guests and geographic concentration of our operations and guests;

 

 

changes in the supply and demand for hotel services;

 

 

foreign exchange rate fluctuations or restructurings;

 

 

decreased business travel as a result of improvements to the alternatives to in-person meetings, including virtual meetings hosted on-line or over private teleconferencing networks; and

 

 

the ability of third-party internet and other travel intermediaries to attract and retain guests.

Any of these factors could limit or reduce the prices we and our franchisees are able to charge for rooms. These factors can also increase costs or affect the ability to develop new hotels or maintain and operate existing hotels. As a result, any of these factors can reduce our profits and limit opportunities for growth.

Macroeconomic and other factors beyond our control can adversely affect and reduce demand for rooms at hotels that we own or franchise.

Macroeconomic and other factors beyond our control can reduce demand for rooms at hotels that we own or franchise. These factors include, but are not limited to:

 

 

changes in general economic conditions, including the severity and duration of any downturn in the U.S. or global economy and financial markets;

 

 

war, political conditions or civil unrest, terrorist activities or threats and heightened travel security measures instituted in response to these events;

 

 

outbreaks of pandemic or contagious diseases, such as avian flu, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and H1N1 (swine flu);

 

 

natural or man-made disasters, such as earthquakes, tsunamis, tornadoes, hurricanes, typhoons, floods, oil spills and nuclear incidents;

 

 

decreased corporate or government travel-related budgets and spending and cancellations, deferrals or renegotiations of group business;

 

 

low consumer confidence, high levels of unemployment or depressed real estate prices;

 

 

the financial condition and general business condition of the airline, automotive, and other transportation-related industries and its impact on travel;

 

 

decreased airline capacities and routes;

 

 

travel-related accidents;

 

 

oil prices and travel costs;

 

 

statements, actions or interventions by governmental officials related to travel and corporate travel-related activities and the resulting negative public perception of such travel and activities;

 

 

climate change and resource scarcity, such as water and energy scarcity;

 

 

domestic and international political and geo-political conditions; and

 

 

cyclical over-building in the hotel and lodging industries.

 

22


Table of Contents

These factors, and the reputational repercussions of these factors, can adversely affect, and from time to time have adversely affected, individual hotels, particular regions and our business, financial condition and results of operations as a whole. Any one or more of these factors could limit or reduce the demand, or the rates that we are able to charge, for rooms. Declines in ADR and occupancy relating to declines in consumer demand will lower RevPAR and may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these factors could increase our operating costs or affect our ability to develop or franchise new hotels or to maintain and operate our existing hotels.

Contraction in the global economy or low levels of economic growth could adversely affect our revenues and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth.

Consumer demand for our rooms is closely linked to the performance of the general economy and is sensitive to business and personal discretionary spending levels. Decreased demand can be especially pronounced during periods of economic contraction or low levels of economic growth, and the recovery period in our industry may lag overall economic improvement. Declines in consumer demand due to adverse general economic conditions could negatively impact our business by decreasing the revenues and profitability of our owned hotels and limiting the amount of franchising fee revenues we are able to generate from our franchised hotels. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2009, our revenues declined approximately $136 million, or 17%, from revenues of $816 million for the year December 31, 2008, and our Adjusted EBITDA declined approximately 30%. In addition, many of the expenses associated with our business, including personnel costs, interest, rent, property taxes, insurance and utilities, are relatively fixed. During a period of overall economic weakness, if we are unable to meaningfully decrease these costs as demand for our hotels decreases, our business operations and financial performance may be adversely affected.

Additionally, recent global economic conditions have significantly affected consumer confidence and behavior and, as a result, historical financial results may be less effective as a means of predicting future demand and operating results. Uncertainty regarding the rate and pace of recovery from the recent economic downturn and the impact any such recovery may have on different regions of the world makes it difficult to predict future profitability levels. Moreover, if further economic weakness in the markets in which we operate were to occur, it could have an adverse impact on our revenues and negatively affect our profitability.

Because we operate in a highly competitive industry, our revenues or profits could be harmed if we are unable to compete effectively.

Competition for hotel guests

The segments of the hotel industry in which we operate are subject to intense competition. La Quinta is a select-service hotel brand that competes primarily against other select-service hotels in both the upper-midscale and the midscale segments. However, our owned and franchised hotels generally operate in segments that contain numerous competitors, including a wide range of lodging facilities offering full-service, select-service and all-suite lodging options. Hotels in other market segments, such as full-service hotels, may lower their rates to a level comparable to those of select-service hotels such as ours that, in turn, may further increase competitive pressure in our segments. Our owned and franchised hotels generally compete for guests on the basis of room rates, quality of accommodations, name recognition, service levels, convenience of locations and reward program offerings. Additionally, an increasing supply of hotel rooms in La Quinta’s market segments, and consolidations in the lodging industry generally, have resulted in

 

23


Table of Contents

the creation of several large, multi-branded hotel chains with diversified operations and greater marketing and financial resources than we have, which has increased competition for guests in the segments in which our owned and franchised hotels operate. If we are unable to compete successfully for hotel guests, our revenues or profits may decline.

Competition for franchise agreements

A primary component of our growth strategy entails increasing our system-wide portfolio of franchised hotels and further growing our franchise fee-based business. We compete for franchise agreements based primarily on brand name recognition and reputation, the room rate that can be realized, royalty fees charged and other contract terms. Some of our competitors may have substantially greater marketing and financial resources, greater brand distribution and awareness and/or offer greater financial incentives than we do. Other competitive factors for franchise agreements include relationships with hotel owners and investors, including institutional owners of multiple hotels, availability and affordability of financing, marketing support, reservation and e-commerce system capacity and efficiency and the ability to make investments that may be necessary to obtain franchise agreements. The terms of our franchise agreements for each of our franchised hotels are also influenced by contract terms offered by our competitors, among other things. As a result, the terms of new franchise agreements may not be as favorable as our current franchise agreements. For example, competition may require us to reduce or change fee structures, make greater use of key money or provide other financial incentives such as loans and guarantees to franchisees and/or reduce the level of hotel improvements required to conform to brand standards. In addition, if the availability of suitable locations for new hotels decreases, planning or other local regulations change or the availability or affordability of financing is limited, the supply of suitable hotels for franchising could be diminished. Additionally, an excess supply of hotel rooms or unfavorable borrowing conditions may discourage potential franchisees from expanding or constructing new hotels, thereby limiting a source of growth of the franchise fees received by us. Our franchise agreements generally restrict our ability to open a new owned or franchised hotel in a limited area near the franchised hotel, which can range from several city blocks in an urban area to several square miles in less populated areas. We may be prohibited from franchising or owning hotels in areas where opportunities exist due to these restrictions. If the hotels that we franchise perform less successfully than those of our competitors, if we are unable to offer terms as favorable as those offered by our competitors, or if the availability of suitable hotels is limited, our ability to compete effectively for new franchise agreements could be reduced. If we are unable to compete successfully for franchisees, our revenues or profits may decline.

Any deterioration in the quality or reputation of our brand could have an adverse impact on our reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our brand and our reputation are among our most important assets. The success of our hotel business and our ability to attract and retain guests and franchise partners depends on brand recognition and reputation. Such dependence makes our hotel business susceptible to reputational damage and to competition from other hotel management and franchise companies. Additionally, for our franchised hotels, the continued success of a hotel owner’s business and its ability to make payments to us may directly depend on the strength and reputation of our franchised hotels and our brand. We cannot assure you that the prior performance of our owned or franchised hotels will be indicative of future results or that competition from other brands will not adversely affect our market position or financial performance.

 

24


Table of Contents

In addition, the brand recognition and support that provide much of the basis for the successful operation of our owned hotels and our franchise business can also mean that changes or problems with La Quinta (e.g., changes in ownership or management or management practices, or acts or omissions that adversely affect our business), or within our hotel business or at other locations (e.g., crime, scandal, litigation, negative publicity, catastrophic fires or similar events or accidents and injuries or other harm to our guests or our team members) can have a substantial negative impact on the operations of otherwise successful individual locations, and can cause a loss of consumer confidence in La Quinta and other hotels in our segment. Adverse incidents have occurred in the past and may occur in the future. The considerable expansion in the use of social media over recent years has compounded the potential scope of the negative publicity that could be generated by such incidents. We could also face legal claims and adverse publicity from a variety of events or conditions, many of which are beyond our control. If the reputation or perceived quality of our brand declines, our reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.

Some of our existing development pipeline may not be developed into La Quinta hotels, which could adversely affect our growth prospects.

As of September 30, 2013, we had a total of 175 franchised hotels in our pipeline, each of which is represented by an executed 20-year franchise agreement. Approximately 80% of the pipeline represents new construction, rather than the conversion of an existing hotel, and, as of September 30, 2013, approximately 36% of the conversions and new construction has commenced. The commitments of owners and developers with whom we have agreements are subject to numerous conditions, and the eventual development and construction of our pipeline not currently under construction is subject to numerous risks, including, in certain cases, the ability of the franchisee to obtain governmental and regulatory approvals and adequate financing. As a result, we cannot assure you that our entire pipeline will develop into new hotels. Any of these risks could have an adverse impact on the growth of our business and future operating results.

Our efforts to renovate, redevelop or develop our hotels could be delayed or become more expensive, which could reduce profits or impair our ability to compete effectively.

We must maintain and renovate our hotels to remain competitive, maintain the value and brand standards of these hotels and comply with applicable laws and regulations. From time to time we evaluate our hotels to determine whether additional capital expenditures are required and will provide an acceptable return on investment.

Our strategy includes maintenance and renovation of our hotels and may include redevelopment, development and conversion of hotels, which is subject to a number of risks, including:

 

 

the inability to obtain financing upon favorable terms or at all;

 

 

construction delays or cost overruns (including labor and materials) that may increase project costs;

 

 

lack of availability of rooms for revenue-generating activities during construction, modernization or renovation projects;

 

 

changes in economic conditions that may result in weakened or lack of demand or negative project returns;

 

25


Table of Contents
 

the inability to find appropriate, strategically located hotels at commercially reasonable prices;

 

 

obtaining zoning, occupancy, and other required permits or authorizations;

 

 

governmental restrictions on the size or kind of development;

 

 

force majeure events, including earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, or tsunamis; and

 

 

design defects that could increase costs.

Furthermore, we generally rely heavily on local contractors, who may be inadequately capitalized or understaffed. The inability or failure of one or more local contractors to perform its obligations may result in construction or remodeling delays, increased costs and loss of revenues. As a result, we may not increase our revenues or generate expected profits and cash flows from the renovation, redevelopment or development of hotels.

If we are not able to begin operating hotels under renovation or development as scheduled, or if renovation investments adversely affect or fail to improve performance, our ability to compete effectively could be diminished and revenues could be reduced. Further, due to the lengthy development cycle, adverse economic conditions may alter or impede our development plans, thereby resulting in incremental costs to us or potential impairment charges. If the cost of funding these renovations or developments exceed budgeted amounts, profits could be reduced. Moreover, during the early stages of operations, charges related to interest expense and depreciation may substantially detract from, or even outweigh, the profitability of certain new hotel investments.

Our hotels are geographically concentrated, which exposes our business to the effects of regional events and occurrences.

We have a concentration of hotels in Texas, Florida and California. Specifically, as of September 30, 2013, approximately 43% of rooms in our system were located in Texas, Florida and California with approximately 25% of rooms in our system located in Texas. The concentration of hotels in one region or a limited number of markets may expose us to risks of adverse economic developments that are greater than if our portfolio were more geographically diverse. These economic developments include regional economic downturns, significant increases in the number of our competitors’ hotels in these markets and potentially higher local property, sales and income taxes in the geographic markets in which we are concentrated. In addition, our hotels are subject to the effects of adverse acts of nature, such as winter storms, hurricanes, hail storms, strong winds, earthquakes and tornados, which have in the past caused damage such as flooding and other damage to our hotels in specific geographic locations, including in the Texas, Florida and California markets. Depending on the severity of these acts of nature, the damage to our hotels could require us to close all or substantially all of our hotels in one or more markets for a period of time while the necessary repairs and renovations, as applicable, are undertaken. Additionally, we cannot assure you that the amount of our hurricane, windstorm, earthquake, flood or other casualty insurance we maintain from time to time would entirely cover damages caused by any such event.

As a result of our geographic concentration of hotels, we will face a greater risk of a negative impact on our revenues in the event these areas are more severely impacted by adverse economic and competitive conditions and extreme weather than other areas in the United States.

 

26


Table of Contents

The hospitality industry is subject to seasonal and cyclical volatility, which may contribute to fluctuations in our financial condition and results of operations.

The hospitality industry is seasonal in nature. The periods during which our hotels experience higher revenues vary from hotel to hotel, depending principally upon location. Generally, our hotel revenues are greater in the second and third quarters than in the first and fourth quarters. The timing of holidays can also impact our quarterly results. This seasonality can be expected to cause quarterly fluctuations in revenue, profit margins and net earnings. In addition, the opening of newly constructed hotels and the timing of any hotel acquisitions or sales may cause a variation of revenue from quarter to quarter. The seasonality and cyclicality of our industry may contribute to fluctuations in our financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is capital intensive and the failure to make necessary investments could adversely affect the quality and reputation of our brand.

For our owned and franchised hotels to remain attractive and competitive, we and the owners of our franchised hotels have to make periodic investments to keep the hotels well maintained, modernized and refurbished. This creates an ongoing need for capital. We and the owners of our franchised hotels may be unable to access capital or unwilling to spend available capital when necessary, even if required by the terms of our franchise agreements. To the extent that owners of franchised hotels and we cannot fund expenditures from cash generated by the operation of the hotels, funds must be borrowed or otherwise obtained, which may be difficult to obtain. Failure to make the investments necessary to maintain or improve hotels, act in accordance with applicable brand standards or project a consistent brand image could adversely affect the quality and reputation of our brand.

If our franchisees are unable to access the capital necessary to implement plans for growth, including our existing pipeline, our revenues may be reduced and our ability to compete effectively may be diminished.

Our franchisees depend on capital to buy and develop new franchised hotels, and our franchisees may be unable to access capital as expected. The availability of funds for development depends in large measure on capital markets and liquidity factors. Instability in the worldwide financial markets and the contraction of available liquidity may constrain the capital markets for hotel and real estate investments. As a result, while lenders have shown willingness to work with borrowers to extend relief in the short to medium term, many current and prospective hotel owners may struggle to find new hotel financing on commercially viable terms. The inability of our existing or future franchisees’ to obtain adequate funding could result in the decrease, delay or stoppage of development of new franchised hotels, including our existing pipeline.

If we are unable to maintain good relationships with our franchisees, revenues could decrease and we may be unable to expand our presence.

As of September 30, 2013, approximately 56% of the La Quinta-branded hotels were operated as franchised hotels. Our franchisees pay us a franchise fee and certain other fees pursuant to our franchise agreements. The viability of the franchising business depends on our ability to establish and maintain good relationships with our franchisees. Franchisees are focused on maximizing the value of their investment and working with a franchisor that can help them be successful in the ownership of their respective hotel investments. The value of our brand and the rapport that we maintain with our franchisees affect renewals of existing agreements and are important factors

 

27


Table of Contents

for potential franchisees considering doing business with us. Our relationships with franchisees generate additional hotel development opportunities that support growth. If we are unable to maintain good relationships with franchisees, we may be unable to renew existing franchise agreements or expand relationships with them. Additionally, opportunities for developing new relationships with additional franchisees may be adversely affected. This, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and our ability to execute our growth strategy.

Franchise agreement standards are important to protecting our brand reputation and perception, and if our franchisees fail to make investments necessary to maintain or improve their hotels, guest preference for the La Quinta brand and reputation could suffer or the franchise agreements with those parties could be terminated.

Substantially all of our franchise agreements require our franchisees to comply with standards that are essential to maintaining brand integrity and reputation and protecting the quality guests ascribe to the La Quinta brand. We depend on our franchisees to comply with these requirements by maintaining and improving hotels through investments, including investments in furniture, fixtures, equipment, amenities, personnel and branding elements.

Franchisees may be unable to access capital or unwilling to spend available capital when necessary, even if required by the terms of their agreements with us. If our franchisees fail to make investments necessary to maintain or improve the hotels that we franchise, guest preference for our brand and our reputation could suffer. Moreover, our franchisees may be unwilling or unable to incur the cost of complying with brand standards as brand standards may evolve from time to time. In addition, if our franchisees breach the terms of their agreements with us, we may elect to exercise our termination rights, which would eliminate revenues from these hotels and cause us to incur expenses related to terminating these relationships. We may be unable to find suitable or offsetting replacements for any terminated relationships. These risks become more pronounced during economic downturns.

Contractual and other disagreements with franchisees could make us liable to them or result in litigation costs or other expenses.

Our franchise agreements require us and our franchisees to comply with operational and performance conditions that are subject to interpretation and could result in disagreements. At any given time, we may be in disputes with one or more of our franchisees. Any dispute we have with our franchisees could result in arbitration or litigation, which could be very expensive for us even if the outcome is ultimately in our favor. We cannot predict the outcome of any such arbitration or litigation, the effect of any adverse judgment against us or the amount of any settlement that we may enter into with any franchisee. An adverse result in any such proceeding could adversely impact our results of operations and prospects.

If our franchise agreements terminate prematurely or expire in accordance with their terms, our revenues could decrease and our costs could increase.

Our franchise agreements may be terminated, renegotiated or expire, but typically have an initial term of 20 years. These agreements also typically contain provisions permitting either party to terminate the franchise agreement after five, ten or fifteen years under certain circumstances.

The continuation of a franchise agreement is subject to the franchisee adhering to certain standards and other applicable terms and conditions (including the obligation to pay certain fees to us). While our franchise agreements generally provide for liquidated damages to be paid to us

 

28


Table of Contents

by franchisees whose agreements have been terminated as the result of a violation of the provisions of the agreement, these damage amounts are typically less than the fees we would have received if the terminated franchisee fulfilled its contractual obligations.

Our franchise agreements also provide early termination rights to the franchisees upon the failure to meet a specified performance test, which is typically based on the hotel’s occupancy rates. Franchisees also may attempt to terminate franchise agreements with us prior to their scheduled expiration date. If that happens, we may have difficulty recovering any resulting damages from the owner or replacing the revenues lost as a result of the termination. In addition, if a franchisee files for bankruptcy, our franchise agreements may be terminable under applicable law.

If any of our franchise agreements are terminated or expire, we cannot assure you that we can obtain new or replacement franchise agreements at the same time that those other agreements are terminated or expire. As a result, we could lose the revenues we derive from that agreement or incur costs related to ending our relationship with the franchisee.

Deterioration in the general financial condition of our franchisees may adversely affect our results.

Our operating results are impacted by the ability of our franchisees to generate revenues at hotels they franchise from us. Our franchisees compete for guests with other hotels in their geographic markets. Some of their competitors may have substantially greater marketing and financial resources than our franchisees, and they may construct new hotels or improve their existing hotels, reduce their prices or expand and improve their marketing programs in ways that adversely affect our franchisees’ operating results and financial condition. In addition, the ability of our franchisees to compete for guests directly impacts the desirability of our brand to current and prospective franchisees.

These factors, among others, could adversely affect the operating results and financial condition of our franchisees. This could result in the financial failure of our owners and result in a termination of the franchisee for non-payment of franchise fees and/or declines in franchise fees and other revenues derived from our franchising business.

If our franchisees are unable to repay or refinance loans secured by the mortgaged hotels, our revenues, profits and capital resources could be reduced and our business could be harmed.

Many of the hotels owned by our franchisees are pledged as collateral for mortgage loans entered into when such hotels were purchased or refinanced by them. If our franchisees are unable to repay or refinance maturing indebtedness on favorable terms or at all, the lenders could declare a default, accelerate the related debt and repossess the hotel. Debt defaults could lead franchisees to sell the hotel on unfavorable terms or to convey the mortgaged hotels to the lender. Any such sale or conveyance could, in certain cases, result in the termination of our franchise agreements or eliminate any anticipated income and cash flows from such hotel, which could negatively affect our business and results of operations.

We are exposed to the risks resulting from significant investments in owned real estate, which could increase our costs, reduce our profits and limit our ability to respond to market conditions.

Real estate ownership is subject to risks not applicable to franchised and managed hotels, including:

 

 

governmental regulations relating to real estate ownership or operations, including tax, environmental, zoning and eminent domain laws;

 

29


Table of Contents
 

loss in value or functionality, or unanticipated liabilities, due to environmental conditions, governmental takings, uninsured casualties or restrictive changes in zoning and similar land use laws and regulations or in health, safety and environmental laws, rules and regulations and other governmental and regulatory action;

 

 

changes in tax laws and property taxes, even if the hotel level cash flows remain the same or decrease;

 

 

differences in potential civil liability between owners and operators for accidents or other occurrences on owned hotels;

 

 

the ongoing need for owner funded capital improvements and expenditures to maintain or upgrade hotels;

 

 

periodic total or partial closures due to renovations and hotel improvements;

 

 

risks associated with mortgage debt, including the possibility of default, fluctuating interest rate levels and uncertainties in the availability of replacement financing;

 

 

risks associated with the possibility that cost increases will outpace revenue increases and that in the event of an economic slowdown, the high proportion of fixed costs will make it difficult to reduce costs to the extent required to offset declining revenues;

 

 

acts of God, including earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, winter storms and other natural disasters (that may result in uninsured losses);

 

 

fluctuations in real estate values or potential impairments in the value of our assets; and

 

 

maintaining tenants for leased properties.

Additionally, real estate investments are relatively illiquid and, therefore, cannot be purchased or sold rapidly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. Buyers may not be identified quickly or be able to secure suitable financing to consummate a transaction or we may not be able to sell hotels on terms favorable to us. Furthermore, sales of certain appreciated hotels could generate material adverse tax consequences, which may affect our ability to sell hotels in response to market conditions and adversely affect our ability to generate cash flows.

Any of the forgoing risks could increase our costs, reduce our profits and limit our ability to respond to market conditions.

Changes in local market or neighborhood conditions may diminish the value of real property.

Hotels may be difficult to convert to other uses if changes in market conditions or in the area in which the hotel is located make hotel use unattractive for any reason. In such cases, large capital investments in real estate may prove difficult to recover. Hotels may be completely undamaged, but may lose significant value that cannot be recovered through insurance or operational changes because of disasters occurring nearby.

The negative impact on profitability and cash flow generation from a decline in revenues is more pronounced in owned hotels because we, as the owner, bear the risk of their high fixed-cost structure. The need to maintain and renovate owned hotels can present challenges, especially when cash generated from operations has declined due to decreased revenues or increased costs, or when government regulations or other factors require expenditures on property improvements that cannot be recovered through rate increases. The effectiveness of any cost-cutting efforts is limited by the fixed-cost nature of our business. As a result, we may not be able

 

30


Table of Contents

to offset revenue reductions through cost cutting, which could further reduce our margins. Further, during times of economic distress, declining demand and declining earnings often result in declining asset values.

In an unfavorable market, we may not be able to sell hotels in the short term. Accordingly, we may not be able to adjust our portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions. Similarly, unfavorable markets may make it difficult to refinance mortgage debt as it comes due.

Failure to keep pace with developments in technology could adversely affect our operations or competitive position.

The hospitality industry demands the use of sophisticated technology and systems for hotel management, brand assurance and compliance, procurement, reservation systems, operation of our loyalty program, distribution of hotel resources to current and future guests and guest amenities. These technologies require refinements, including compliance with privacy regulations and requirements of third parties such as the payment card industry. The development and maintenance of these technologies may require significant capital. We cannot assure you that as various systems and technologies become outdated or new technology is required, we will be able to replace or introduce them as quickly as our competition or in a cost-effective and timely manner. We also cannot assure you that we will achieve the benefits we may have been anticipating from any new technology or system.

Failures in, material damage to, or interruptions in our information technology systems, software or websites, including as a result of cyber-attacks, and difficulties in updating our existing software or developing or implementing new software could have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations.

We depend heavily upon our information technology systems in the conduct of our business. For example, we own, license or otherwise contract for sophisticated technology and systems for hotel management, procurement, reservations, phone switches and the operation of our Returns program. Those systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, security breaches and natural and manmade disasters. In particular, from time to time we and third parties who serve us experience cyber-attacks, attempted breaches of our or their information technology systems and networks or similar events, which could result in a loss of sensitive business or customer information, systems interruption or the disruption of our operations.

Damage or interruption to our information systems may require a significant investment to fix or replace them, and we may suffer interruptions in our operations in the interim. In addition, costs and potential problems and interruptions associated with the implementation of new or upgraded systems and technology or with maintenance or adequate support of existing systems could also disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations. Any material interruptions or failures in our systems, including those that may result from our failure to adequately develop, implement and maintain a robust disaster recovery plan and backup systems could severely affect our ability to conduct normal business operations and, as a result, may have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations.

We are vulnerable to various risks and uncertainties associated with our website, including changes in required technology interfaces, website downtime and other technical failures, costs and technical issues as we upgrade our website software, computer viruses, changes in applicable federal and state regulation, security breaches, legal claims related to our website operations

 

31


Table of Contents

and e-commerce fulfillment and other consumer privacy concerns. Our failure to successfully respond to these risks and uncertainties could reduce website sales and have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations.

Failure of third party technology providers or vendors to provide services and technology in a satisfactory manner could adversely affect our business.

We rely on third parties for the performance of a significant portion of our information technology functions worldwide and the provision of information technology and business process services. The success of our business depends in part on maintaining our relationships with these third parties and their continuing ability to perform these functions and services in a timely and satisfactory manner. If we experience a loss or disruption in the provision of any of these functions or services, or they are not performed in a satisfactory manner, we may have difficulty in finding alternate providers on terms favorable to us, in a timely manner or at all, and our business could be adversely affected.

We rely on certain software vendors to maintain and periodically upgrade many of our information technology systems so that they can continue to support our business. The software programs supporting many of our systems were licensed to us by independent software developers. The inability of these developers or us to continue to maintain and upgrade these information systems and software programs would disrupt or reduce the efficiency of our operations if we were unable to convert to alternate systems in an efficient and timely manner.

We may be exposed to risks and costs associated with protecting the integrity and security of our guests’ personal information.

We are subject to various risks associated with the collection, handling, storage and transmission of sensitive information, including risks related to compliance with U.S. and foreign data collection and privacy laws and other contractual obligations, as well as the risk that our systems collecting such information could be compromised. We collect and maintain information relating to our employees and guests for various business purposes, including managing our workforce and marketing and promotion purposes of our hotel business. Our various information technology systems enter, process, summarize and report such data, including credit card numbers and other personally identifiable information. A significant number of guest purchases are made using credit cards. Additionally, as of September 30, 2013, approximately 20.4% of our guest reservations are placed through our website, including through mobile devices via LQ Instant Hold. In order for our business to function successfully, we must be able to handle and transmit confidential information, including credit card information, securely.

Privacy regulation is an evolving area in which different jurisdictions may subject us to increasingly demanding or inconsistent compliance requirements. Compliance with applicable privacy laws, regulations and policies may increase our operating costs and/or adversely affect our ability to service hotel guests and market our products, hotels and services to hotel guests. In addition, our failure to comply with applicable privacy laws and regulations, with our own privacy policies or with third-party requirements (or in some circumstances non-compliance by third parties engaged by us), or a breach of security in which personal data are compromised, could result in fines, litigation, adverse reputation impacts, remedial and other expenses, criminal sanctions, or restrictions on the use or transfer of data, which could adversely affect our business. We cannot assure you that our business will always be conducted in compliance with these laws, regulations and policies.

 

32


Table of Contents

Even if we are fully compliant with such legal standards, we may not be able to prevent security breaches involving guest transaction data and identity theft. In addition, efforts to hack or breach security measures, failures of systems or software to operate as designed or intended, viruses, operator error, or inadvertent releases of data all threaten our information systems and records. Our reliance on computer, Internet-based and mobile systems and communications and the frequency and sophistication of efforts by hackers to gain unauthorized access to such systems have increased in recent years. Any breach, theft, loss, or fraudulent use of guest, employee or Company data could cause consumers to lose confidence in the security of our website and choose not to purchase from us. If a computer hacker or other criminal is able to circumvent our security measures, he or she could destroy or steal valuable information or disrupt our operations. Any security breach could expose us to risks of data loss, litigation and action for damage and could seriously disrupt our operations and harm our reputation, any of which could adversely affect our business.

Failure to comply with marketing and advertising laws, including with regard to direct marketing, could result in fines or place restrictions on our business.

We rely on a variety of direct marketing techniques, including telemarketing, email marketing and postal mailings. Any further restrictions in laws such as the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, the Telemarketing Sales Rule, CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, and various U.S. state laws, or new federal laws, regarding marketing and solicitation or international data protection laws that govern these activities could adversely affect current or planned marketing activities and could force further changes in our marketing strategy. If this occurs, we may not be able to develop adequate alternative marketing strategies. We also obtain access to potential guests from travel service providers or other companies with whom we have substantial relationships. We market to some individuals on these lists directly or through other companies’ marketing materials. If access to these lists was prohibited or otherwise restricted, our ability to develop new guests, and introduce them to our hotels could be impaired.

The growth of internet reservation channels could adversely affect our business and profitability.

A significant percentage of hotel rooms for individual guests is booked through internet travel intermediaries. We contract with such intermediaries and pay them various commissions and transaction fees for sales of our rooms through their system. If such bookings increase, these intermediaries may be able to obtain higher commissions, reduced room rates or other significant contract concessions from us or our franchisees. Moreover, hospitality intermediaries generally employ aggressive marketing strategies, including expending significant resources for online and television advertising campaigns to drive consumers to their websites. Further, some of these internet travel intermediaries are attempting to commoditize hotel rooms by increasing the importance of price and general indicators of quality at the expense of brand identification. Consumers may develop brand loyalties to the intermediaries’ websites and reservations systems rather than to the La Quinta brand. If this happens, our business and profitability may be significantly harmed as shifting guest loyalties divert bookings away from our websites, or as the fees charged by third-party websites increase the overall cost of internet bookings for our hotels.

In addition, recent class action litigation against several online travel intermediaries and lodging companies challenges the legality under antitrust law of certain provisions in contracts with third party intermediaries. While the travel intermediaries and lodging companies are vigorously defending this litigation and believe the contract provisions are lawful, the courts will ultimately

 

33


Table of Contents

determine this issue and an adverse outcome could force hotel companies, including us, to alter their business arrangements with these third parties which could have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our reservation system is an important component of the La Quinta brand and a disruption to its functioning could have an adverse effect on our hotels.

We license software from unaffiliated third parties for the La Quinta hotels reservation system. Losing these licenses may adversely affect our ability to maintain a technically adequate reservations system, which, in the absence of suitable alternatives, would inhibit our ability to conduct our business (including our ability to attract and retain franchise arrangements) and, ultimately, diminish our ability to generate revenue.

We manage a reservation system that communicates reservations to our owned and franchised hotels that have been made by individuals directly, either online or by telephone to our call centers, or through intermediaries like travel agents, internet travel web sites and other distribution channels. The cost, speed, efficacy and efficiency of the reservation system, as well as protection of personal or confidential information of its users, are important aspects of the business and are major considerations of franchisees in choosing to affiliate with the La Quinta brand. Any degradation of, failure of adequate development relative to, or security breach of, our reservation system may adversely affect our business.

Our reservation system relies on data communications networks operated by unaffiliated third parties. Any significant interruption of the function of our reservation system (or significant parts of our reservation system) may adversely affect our business as well as our ability to generate revenues.

The cessation, reduction or taxation of program benefits of our Returns loyalty program could adversely affect the La Quinta brand and guest loyalty.

We manage the Returns program for the La Quinta brand. Our owned and franchised hotels contribute a percentage of the guest’s room rate per night to the program for each hotel stay of a Returns program member. We arrange with service providers such as airlines to exchange monetary value represented by points for program awards and we may charge a license fee to such service providers for use of the La Quinta brand trademarks. Returns program members accumulate points based on eligible stays and hotel charges and redeem the points for a range of benefits, including free rooms, airline miles and other items of value. The Returns program is an important aspect of our business and of the affiliation value for hotel owners under franchise agreements. Currently, the program benefits are not taxed as income to members. If the program awards and benefits are materially altered, curtailed or taxed and, as a result, a material number of Returns members choose to stay at non-La Quinta-branded hotels, our business could be adversely affected.

Any failure to protect our trademarks and other intellectual property could reduce the value of our brand and harm our business.

The recognition and reputation of our brand are important to our success. We rely on trademark laws to protect our proprietary rights. The success of our business depends in part upon our continued ability to use our trademarks to increase brand awareness and further develop our brand in both domestic and international markets. From time to time, we apply to have certain trademarks registered; however, we cannot assure you that those trademark or other intellectual

 

34


Table of Contents

property registrations will be granted or that the steps we take to use, control or protect our trademarks or other intellectual property in the United States and other jurisdictions will always be adequate to prevent third parties, including former employees, from copying or using the trademarks or other intellectual property without authorization or in a manner where authorization may not be required. We may also fail to obtain and maintain trademark protection for our brand in all jurisdictions. For example, in certain jurisdictions, third parties have registered or otherwise have the right to use certain trademarks that are the same as or similar to our trademarks, which could prevent us from registering trademarks and opening hotels in that jurisdiction. In addition, “la quinta” is a commonly used term in Central and South America and, as such, we may face greater difficulty protecting our registered trademarks in those regions. Third parties may also challenge our rights to certain trademarks or oppose our trademark applications. Defending against any such proceedings may be costly, and if unsuccessful, could result in the loss of important intellectual property rights. Obtaining and maintaining trademark protection for multiple brands in multiple jurisdictions is also expensive, and we may therefore elect not to apply for or to maintain certain trademarks. See “Business—Our trademarks.”

Our intellectual property is also vulnerable to unauthorized copying or use in some jurisdictions outside the United States, where local law, or lax enforcement of law, may not adequately protect it. If our trademarks or other intellectual property are misappropriated, or otherwise used in a manner where authorization may not be required, the La Quinta brand, including its value and reputation, could be harmed.

We monitor the unauthorized copying or use of intellectual property in the United States and other countries in which we operate or plan to operate. However, it is difficult to protect against every possible unauthorized use of our trademarks or other intellectual property and there are times where we have resorted, and may in the future resort, to litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights. Litigation of this type could be costly, force us to divert our resources, lead to counterclaims or other claims against us or otherwise harm our business or reputation. In addition, we license certain of our trademarks to third parties. For example, we grant our franchisees a right to use certain of our trademarks in connection with their operation of the applicable hotel. If a franchisee or other licensee fails to maintain the quality of the goods and services used in connection with the licensed trademarks, our rights to, and the value of, our trademarks could potentially be harmed. Negative publicity relating to the franchisee or licensee could also be incorrectly associated with us, which could harm our business. Failure to maintain, control and protect our trademarks and other intellectual property would likely adversely affect the ability of our hotels to generate revenues or our ability to enter into new franchise agreements.

Third-party claims that we infringe patent, trademark, copyright or other intellectual property rights or misappropriate trade secrets of others could subject us to damages and other costs and expenses.

Third parties may make claims against us for infringing their patent, trademark, copyright or other intellectual property rights or for misappropriating their trade secrets. Any such claims, even those without merit, could:

 

 

be expensive and time consuming to defend;

 

 

force us to stop using the intellectual property that is being challenged, or to stop providing products or services that use the challenged intellectual property;

 

35


Table of Contents
 

force us to rebrand our services;

 

 

divert management’s attention and resources;

 

 

force us to enter into royalty, licensing, co-existence or other agreements to obtain the right to use a third party’s intellectual property;

 

 

limit the use or the scope of our intellectual property or other rights;

 

 

force us to pay significant damages; and

 

 

limit where we can open future hotels.

In addition, we may be required to indemnify franchisees for any losses they incur as a result of any such infringement claims. All necessary royalty, licensing or other agreements may not be available to us at all or on acceptable terms. Any costs, lost revenues, changes to our business or diversion of management attention related to intellectual property claims against us, whether successful or not, could adversely affect our business.

Because a component of our strategy is to continue to grow our franchise business internationally, the risks of doing business internationally could lower our revenues, increase our costs, reduce our profits or disrupt our business.

At September 30, 2013, six of our 466 franchised hotels were located outside of the United States, which represents approximately 1.3% of our total franchised hotels. We expect to increase the number of franchised hotels located outside of the United States in the coming years, with approximately 10.8% of our pipeline relating to hotels located outside the United States. As a result, we are and will be, on an increasing basis, subject to the risks of doing business outside the United States, including:

 

 

recessionary trends or economic instability in international markets;

 

 

changes in foreign currency exchange rates or currency restructurings and hyperinflation or deflation in the countries in which we operate;

 

 

the imposition of restrictions on currency conversion or the transfer of funds or limitations on our ability to repatriate non-U.S. earnings in a tax effective manner;

 

 

the presence and acceptance of varying levels of business corruption in international markets;

 

 

the impact of various anti-corruption and other laws;

 

 

the ability to comply with, or impact of complying with, complex and changing laws, regulations and policies of foreign governments that may affect investments or operations, including foreign ownership restrictions, import and export controls, tariffs, embargoes, licensing requirements and regulations, increases in taxes paid and other changes in applicable tax laws;

 

 

uncertainties as to local laws and enforcement of contract and intellectual property rights;

 

 

the difficulties involved in managing an organization doing business in many different countries;

 

 

rapid changes in governmental, economic and political policies, political or civil unrest, acts of terrorism or the threat of international boycotts or U.S. anti-boycott legislation;

 

36


Table of Contents
 

increases in anti-American sentiment and the identification of the licensed brands as an American brand;

 

 

forced nationalization of franchised hotels by local, state or national governments;

 

 

the effect of disruptions caused by severe weather, natural disasters, outbreak of disease or other events that make travel to a particular region less attractive or more difficult; and

 

 

political and economic instability.

Any or all of these factors may adversely affect the income from and the market value of our hotels located in international markets. In addition, the economy of any region in which our hotels are located may be adversely affected to a greater degree than that of other areas of the country or the world by certain developments affecting industries concentrated in that region or country. A decline in the general economic condition in regions or countries in which our hotels are located could result in a decrease in hotel demand in the region, and the income from and market value of these hotels may be adversely affected. Over time, room rates in regions can fluctuate and have historically fluctuated widely. While these factors and the impact of these factors are difficult to predict, any one or more of them could lower our revenues, increase our costs, reduce our profits or disrupt our business, and as our international operations increase, these risks will become more pronounced.

A number of our owned hotels are subject to ground leases; if we are found to be in breach of a ground lease or are unable to renew a ground lease, we could be adversely affected.

Twenty of our owned hotels are either completely or partially on land subject to ground leases. If we are found to be in breach of a ground lease or ground sublease, such ground lease or sublease could be terminated. Assuming that we exercise all available options to extend the terms of our ground leases and ground subleases, all of our ground leases and ground subleases will expire between 2014 and 2102, with two expiring in the next three years. However, in certain cases, our ability to exercise such options is subject to the condition that we are not in default under the terms of the ground lease or ground sublease, as applicable, at the time that we exercise such options and/or the time such extension occurs, and we can provide no assurances that we will be able to exercise our options at such time. Furthermore, we can provide no assurances that we will be able to renew our ground leases and ground subleases upon expiration. If a ground lease or ground sublease expires or is terminated, we would be unable to derive income from such hotel, which could adversely affect us.

If an appropriate opportunity becomes available, we may seek to expand through acquisitions of and investments in other businesses and hotels, or through alliances. We may also seek to divest some of our hotels and other assets. These acquisition and disposition activities may be unsuccessful or divert management’s attention.

We may consider strategic and complementary acquisitions of and investments in other hotel or hospitality brands, businesses, hotels or other assets. Furthermore, we may pursue these opportunities in alliance with existing or prospective owners of franchised hotels. In many cases, we will be competing for these opportunities with third parties that may have substantially greater financial resources than us. Acquisitions or investments in brands, businesses, hotels or assets as well as these alliances are subject to risks that could affect our business, including risks related to:

 

 

issuing shares of stock that could dilute the interests of our existing stockholders;

 

spending cash and incurring debt;

 

37


Table of Contents
 

assuming contingent liabilities; or

 

creating additional expenses.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify opportunities or complete transactions on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or that we will actually realize any anticipated benefits from such acquisitions, investments or alliances. There may be high barriers to entry in certain key markets and scarcity of available development and investment opportunities in desirable locations. Similarly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain financing for acquisitions or investments on attractive terms or at all, or that the ability to obtain financing will not be restricted by the terms of our indebtedness.

The success of any such acquisitions or investments also will depend, in part, on our ability to integrate the acquisition or investment with our existing operations. We may experience difficulty with integrating acquired businesses, hotels or other assets, including difficulties relating to:

 

 

coordinating sales, distribution, and marketing functions;

 

integrating technology information systems; and

 

preserving the important guest, labor and other relationships of the acquired assets.

Divestment of some of our hotels or assets may yield lower than expected returns. In some circumstances, sales of hotels or other assets may result in losses. Upon a sale of hotels or assets, we may become subject to contractual indemnity obligations, incur material losses, including impairment charges, or tax liabilities or, as a result of required debt repayment, face a shortage of liquidity. In addition, any acquisitions, investments, dispositions or alliances could demand significant attention from management that would otherwise be available for business operations, which could harm our business.

Governmental regulation may adversely affect the operation of our hotels.

The hotels that we operate are subject to extensive local, regional and national regulations and, on a periodic basis, must obtain various licenses and permits. The laws and regulations of states, counties, cities, provinces and other political subdivisions may also require certain registration, disclosure statements and other practices with respect to the franchising of hotels. Any failure to identify, obtain or maintain required licenses and permits could result in adverse consequences.

The hotel industry is subject to extensive federal, state and local governmental regulations in the United States and the other countries in which our franchised hotels operate, including those relating to building and zoning requirements and those relating to the preparation and sale of food. Hotels and their owners and operators are also subject to licensing and regulation by state and local departments relating to health, sanitation, fire and safety standards, and to laws governing their relationships with employees, including minimum wage requirements, overtime, working conditions and citizenship requirements. In connection with the continued operation or remodeling of certain of our hotels, we or our franchisees may be required to expend funds to meet federal, state and local regulations. For example, we may incur significant costs complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), which requires that all public accommodations meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The regulations also mandate certain operational requirements that hotel operators must observe. If, pursuant to the ADA, we are required to make substantial alterations to, and capital expenditures for, our hotels, including removal of access barriers, it could increase our expenditures and, in turn, could reduce our earnings. Any failure to obtain or maintain any such licenses or any publicity resulting

 

38


Table of Contents

from actual or alleged violations of any such laws and regulations could result in injunctive relief, fines, damage awards or capital expenditures and could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Moreover, new or revised laws and regulations or new interpretations of existing laws and regulations could affect the operation of our hotels or result in significant additional expense and operating restrictions on us and our franchisees.

In addition, we may be subject to certain laws and regulations that govern the offer and sale of franchises, including regulations promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”). Many franchise laws impose substantive requirements on franchise agreements, including limitations on provisions concerning the termination or non-renewal of a franchise. The FTC requires franchisors to make extensive disclosure to prospective franchisees but does not require registration. Some franchise laws require that certain materials be registered before franchises can be offered or sold in that state. The failure to obtain or retain licenses or approvals to sell franchises could adversely affect us and our franchisees.

Failure to comply with laws and regulations applicable to our international operations may increase costs, reduce profits, limit growth or subject us to broader liability.

Our business operations in countries outside the United States are subject to a number of U.S. federal laws and regulations, including restrictions imposed by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) as well as trade sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) and the Commerce Department. The FCPA is intended to prohibit bribery of foreign officials or parties and requires public companies in the United States to keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect those companies’ transactions. OFAC and the Commerce Department administer and enforce economic and trade sanctions based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals against targeted foreign states, organizations and individuals. Some of our business operations are also subject to the laws and regulations of non-U.S. jurisdictions, including anti-corruption legislation in the countries in which we conduct operations. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we could be exposed to claims for damages, financial penalties, reputational harm, incarceration of our employees or restrictions on our operation, ownership or franchising of hotels, including the termination of our franchise and ownership rights. These restrictions could increase our costs of operations, reduce our profits or cause us to forgo development opportunities that would otherwise support our growth.

In August 2012, Congress enacted the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (“ITRSHRA”), which expands the scope of U.S. sanctions against Iran. More specifically, Section 219 of the ITRSHRA amended the Exchange Act to require companies subject to Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, reporting obligations under Section 13 of the Exchange Act to disclose in their periodic reports specified dealings or transactions involving Iran or other individuals and entities targeted by certain OFAC sanctions engaged in by the reporting company or any of its affiliates during the period covered by the relevant periodic report. In some cases, ITRSHRA requires companies to disclose these types of transactions even if they were permissible under U.S. law. These companies are required to separately file with the SEC a notice that such activities have been disclosed in the relevant periodic report, and the SEC is required to post this notice of disclosure on its website and send the report to the U.S. President and certain U.S. Congressional committees. The U.S. President thereafter is required to initiate an investigation and, within 180 days of initiating such an investigation, to determine whether sanctions should be imposed. Under ITRSHRA, we would be required to report if we or any of our “affiliates” knowingly engaged in certain specified activities during the period covered by the report. Because the SEC defines the term “affiliate” broadly, it includes any entity controlled by us as well as any

 

39


Table of Contents

person or entity that controls us or is under common control with us. Because we may be deemed to be a controlled affiliate of Blackstone, affiliates of Blackstone may also be considered our affiliates. Disclosure of such activity by us or our affiliates, even if such activity is not subject to sanctions under applicable law, and any sanctions actually imposed on us or our affiliates as a result of these activities, could harm our reputation and have a negative impact on our business.

Foreign or U.S. environmental laws and regulations may cause us to incur substantial costs or subject us to potential liabilities.

We are subject to certain compliance costs and potential liabilities under various foreign and U.S. federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These laws and regulations govern actions including air emissions, the use, storage and disposal of hazardous and toxic substances, and wastewater disposal. Our failure to comply with such laws, including any required permits or licenses, could result in substantial fines or possible revocation of our authority to conduct some of our operations. We could also be liable under such laws for the costs of investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances at our currently or formerly owned, operated or franchised hotels or at third-party locations in connection with our waste disposal operations, regardless of whether or not we knew of, or caused, the presence or release of such substances. Some laws may regard us as having liability as an operator by virtue of how we may implement our franchise agreements, rendering us potentially responsible for addressing environmental or other conditions existing at our franchised hotels. In some cases, we may be entitled to indemnification from the party that caused the contamination, or pursuant to our franchise agreements, but there can be no assurance that we would be able to recover all or any costs we incur in addressing such problems. From time to time, we may be required to remediate such substances or remove, abate or manage asbestos, mold, radon gas, lead or other hazardous conditions at our hotels. The presence or release of such toxic or hazardous substances could result in third-party claims for personal injury, property or natural resource damages, business interruption or other losses. Such claims and the need to investigate, remediate, or otherwise address hazardous, toxic or unsafe conditions could adversely affect our operations, the value of any affected hotel, or our ability to sell, lease or assign our rights in any such hotel, or could otherwise harm our business or reputation. Environmental, health and safety requirements have also become increasingly stringent, and our costs may increase as a result. For example, Congress, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, and some states are considering or have undertaken actions to regulate and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. New or revised laws and regulations or new interpretations of existing laws and regulations, such as those related to climate change, could affect the operation of our owned and franchised hotels or result in significant additional expense and operating restrictions on us and our franchisees. The potential for changes in the frequency, duration and severity of extreme weather events that may be a result of climate change could lead to significant property damage at our hotels and other assets, impact our ability to obtain insurance coverage in areas that are most vulnerable to such events, and have a negative effect on revenues.

Asbestos, lead-based paint, mold and other hotel related issues could expose us to substantial liability.

Certain U.S. and foreign laws impose liability for the release of asbestos containing materials into the air or require the removal or containment of asbestos containing materials, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with exposure to toxic or hazardous substances. Some of our owned hotels may have asbestos containing materials, and when these materials have been discovered, we have taken action as

 

40


Table of Contents

and when required by applicable law. Such laws require that, as owners or operators of buildings containing asbestos, we must (i) properly manage and maintain the asbestos, (ii) notify and train those who may come into contact with asbestos and (iii) undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, if asbestos would be disturbed during renovation or demolition of a building. Such laws may impose fines and penalties on us if we fail to comply with these requirements and may allow third parties to seek recovery for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos fibers, which could significantly increase our operating costs and reduce our earnings.

In addition, certain laws impose liability for lead based paint, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with lead based paint. Limits are placed on the amount of lead that may be present in public drinking water supplies, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for injuries arising from exposure to high lead concentration.

Other materials used in the construction of our owned hotels that are currently thought to be safe may in the future be determined to be hazardous, and could expose us to substantial liability for damages, injuries, adverse health effects or removal and disposal costs. In addition, other building supplies thought to be appropriate for their use, while not toxic, have been discovered to be defective (such as fire-retardant plywood or polybutylene piping). Defects in such supplies have resulted in substantial costs on the part of the owners or operators of affected hotels to remove and replace the defective materials. Materials currently thought to be appropriate or safe may in the future prove to be defective, and could result in substantial costs or losses.

Problems associated with mold may pose risks to our hotels and also may be the basis for personal injury claims against us. There is no generally accepted standard for the assessment of mold. If left unchecked or inadequately addressed, the growth of mold could result in litigation and remediation expenses, or in a closure of some or all of a hotel, that could adversely affect revenues from an individual hotel. We have discovered that some of our owned hotels have problems with mold. The presence of mold at some of our owned hotels has required us to undertake a remediation program to remove the mold from the affected hotels. The cost of remediation to date has not been material. However, remediation costs may substantially increase if there is mold in our other hotels or if costs related to mold such as legal and insurance expense continue to increase rapidly, which could significantly increase our operating costs and reduce our earnings.

Additionally, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has identified certain health risks associated with elevated radon gas in buildings, and has recommended that certain mitigating measures be considered. It is possible that other environmental conditions not currently known, or known but not currently thought to be dangerous, may in the future be determined to present a risk to health or safety, such as with respect to possible exposure to waterborne pathogens.

Franchisees are exposed to the same risks with respect to the hotels that they own and operate. Additionally, some laws may regard us as having liability as an operator by virtue of how we may implement our franchise agreements, rendering us potentially responsible for addressing environmental or other conditions existing at our franchised hotels. Our franchise agreements typically require our franchisees to assume and indemnify us against such liabilities, but there can be no assurance that governmental authorities will not look directly to us to address such matters or that we would be able to recover from our hotel owners any costs we incur in doing so.

 

41


Table of Contents

For all of these reasons, the presence of, or potential for contamination by, such hazardous or toxic substances, or exposure to pathogens, at, on, under, adjacent to, emanating from, or in any of our hotels could materially adversely affect the operations, the value of such hotel or the ability to attract guests to such hotel, or could otherwise harm our business or reputation.

We are subject to risks from litigation filed by or against us.

Legal or governmental proceedings brought by or on behalf of franchisees, employees or guests may adversely affect our financial results. In recent years, a number of hospitality companies have been subject to lawsuits, including class action lawsuits, alleging violations of federal laws and regulations regarding workplace and employment matters, consumer protection claims and other commercial matters. A number of these lawsuits have resulted in the payment of substantial damages by the defendants through adverse judgments or settlement agreements. Similar lawsuits have been and may be instituted against us from time to time, and we may incur substantial damages and expenses resulting from lawsuits of this type, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. From time to time, we may also be engaged in lawsuits against franchisees. Similarly, we may from time to time institute legal proceedings on behalf of ourselves or others, the ultimate outcome of which could cause us to incur substantial damages and expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The loss of senior executives or key field personnel, such as general managers, could significantly harm our business.

Our ability to maintain our competitive position depends to a large degree on the efforts and skills of our senior executives. On average, our management team members have over 19 years of experience in lodging and lodging related industries or have other relevant experience; however, we cannot guarantee that these individuals will remain with us. Finding suitable replacements for senior executives could be difficult. We currently do not have a life insurance policy or key person insurance policy with respect to any of our senior executives. Losing the services of one or more of these senior executives could adversely affect strategic relationships, including relationships with franchisees and vendors, and limit our ability to execute our business strategies.

We also rely on the general managers at each of our owned hotels to manage daily operations and oversee the efforts of their team members. These general managers are trained professionals in the hospitality industry and have extensive experience in many markets worldwide. The failure to retain, train or successfully manage general managers for our owned hotels could negatively affect our operations.

Labor shortages could restrict our ability to operate our hotels or grow our business or result in increased labor costs that could reduce our profits.

Our success depends in large part on our ability to attract, retain, train, manage and engage employees. If we are unable to attract, retain, train, manage and engage skilled employees, our ability to manage and staff the owned hotels adequately could be impaired, which could reduce guest satisfaction. In addition, the inability of our franchisees to attract, retain, train, manage and engage skilled employees for the franchised hotels could adversely affect our business. Staffing shortages also could hinder our ability to grow and expand our businesses. Because payroll costs are a major component of the operating expenses at our hotels, a shortage of skilled labor could also require higher wages that would increase labor costs, which could adversely affect our profits and the profits of our franchisees. In addition, increases in minimum wage rates could result in significantly increased costs and reduced profits for us and our franchisees.

 

42


Table of Contents

Higher health care costs and labor costs could adversely affect our business.

With the passage in 2010 of the U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “Act”), we are required to provide affordable coverage, as defined in the Act, to all employees, or otherwise be subject to a payment per employee based on the affordability criteria in the Act. Many of these requirements will be phased in over a period of time, with the majority of the most impactful provisions affecting us presently anticipated to begin in 2015. Additionally, some states and localities have passed state and local laws mandating the provision of certain levels of health benefits by some employers. Increased health care and insurance costs could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition changes in federal or state workplace regulations could adversely affect our ability to meet our financial targets.

Attempts by labor organizations to organize groups of our employees or changes in labor laws could disrupt our operations, increase our labor costs or interfere with the ability of our management to focus on implementing our business strategies.

Although none of our employees are currently covered under collective bargaining agreements, we cannot guarantee that our employees will not elect to be represented by labor unions in the future. We may become subject to collective bargaining agreements, similar agreements or regulations enforced by governmental entities in the future. Changes in the federal regulatory scheme could make it easier for unions to organize groups of our employees. If relationships with our employees become adverse, our hotels could experience labor disruptions such as strikes, lockouts and public demonstrations. Additionally, if such changes take effect, our employees could be subject to organizational efforts, which could potentially lead to disruptions or require our management’s time to address unionization issues. Labor regulation could also lead to higher wage and benefit costs, changes in work rules that raise operating expenses and legal costs, and limit our ability to take cost saving measures during economic downturns. These or similar agreements, legislation or changes in regulations could disrupt our operations, hinder our ability to cross-train and cross-promote our employees due to prescribed work rules and job classifications, reduce our profitability or interfere with the ability of our management to focus on executing our business and operating strategies.

If the insurance that we or our franchisees carry does not sufficiently cover damage or other potential losses or liabilities to third parties involving our hotels, our profits could be reduced.

We carry, and we require our franchisees to carry, insurance from insurance carriers that we believe is adequate for foreseeable first and third party losses and with terms and conditions that we believe are reasonable and customary. Nevertheless, market forces beyond our control could limit the scope of the insurance coverage that we and our franchisees can obtain or restrict our or our franchisees’ ability to buy insurance coverage at reasonable rates. In the event of a substantial loss, the insurance coverage that we or our franchisees carry may not be sufficient to reimburse us in full for our losses or pay the full value of financial obligations, liabilities or the replacement cost of any lost investment or property loss, which could adversely affect our profits. In addition, risks that may fall outside the general coverage terms and limits of the policies and certain types of losses that are significantly uncertain, or generally of a catastrophic nature, such as hurricanes, earthquakes and floods or terrorist acts, may be uninsurable or not economically insurable. If such losses or events occur, they could cause substantial damage to our hotels or our franchised hotels or the surrounding area, without any insurance coverage. Further, we and our franchisees may not be able to obtain or renew insurance policies or, if we or our franchisees are able to obtain or renew our coverage, it may be at a significantly higher cost than the historic cost.

 

43


Table of Contents

In addition, insurance coverage for our hotels and for casualty losses does not customarily cover damages that are characterized as punitive or similar damages. As a result, any claims or legal proceedings, or settlement of any such claims or legal proceedings that result in damages that are characterized as punitive or similar damages may not be covered by our insurance. If these types of damages are substantial, our financial condition and results of operation may be adversely affected.

In some cases, these factors could result in certain losses being completely uninsured. As a result, we or our franchisees could lose some or all of the capital invested in a hotel, as well as the anticipated future revenues and profits from the hotel. We or our franchisees could suffer an uninsured or underinsured loss, and we may not have sufficient insurance to cover awards of damages resulting from claims made against us.

Terrorism insurance may not be available at all or at commercially reasonable rates.

Following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York City and the Washington, D.C. area, Congress passed the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, which established the Terrorism Insurance Program to provide insurance capacity for terrorist acts. On December 26, 2007, the Terrorism Insurance Program was extended by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 through December 31, 2014, or TRIPRA. We carry insurance from insurance carriers to respond to both first-party and third-party liability losses related to terrorism. We purchase our first-party property damage and business interruption insurance from a stand-alone market in place of and to supplement insurance from government run pools. If TRIPRA is not extended or renewed upon its expiration in 2014, premiums for terrorism insurance coverage will likely increase and/or the terms of such insurance may be materially amended to increase stated exclusions or to otherwise effectively decrease the scope of coverage available, perhaps to the point where it is effectively unavailable.

Terrorist attacks and military conflicts may adversely affect the hospitality industry.

The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 underscore the possibility that large public facilities or economically important assets could become the target of terrorist attacks in the future. The occurrence or the possibility of terrorist attacks or military conflicts could generally reduce travel to affected areas for tourism and business or adversely affect the willingness of guests to stay in or avail themselves of hotel services and result in higher costs for security and insurance premiums or diminish the availability of insurance coverage for losses related to terrorist attacks, all of which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Changes to estimates or projections used to assess the fair value of our assets, or operating results that are lower than our current estimates at certain locations, may cause us to incur impairment charges that could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our total assets include intangible assets with an indefinite life, other intangible assets with finite useful lives, and substantial amounts of long-lived assets, principally property and equipment, including hotels. We analyze our assets for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset might be impaired. Our evaluation of impairment requires us to make certain estimates and assumptions including projections of future results. After performing our evaluation for impairment, including an analysis to determine the recoverability of long-lived assets, we will record an impairment loss when the carrying value of the underlying asset, asset group or reporting unit exceeds its fair

 

44


Table of Contents

value. In connection with the impairment test in 2012, we determined that property and equipment related to certain hotels were partially impaired primarily due to changes in market position, the economy, decreased overall travel demand and/or decrease in assumed holding period. As a result of the testing in 2012, we recorded an impairment loss of approximately $51.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, driven primarily by assets held for sale. If the estimates or assumptions used in our evaluation of impairment change, we may be required to record additional impairment charges on certain of these assets. During times of economic distress, declining demand and declining earnings often result in declining asset values. If any impairment losses we recognize are significant, our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

Changes in federal, state, local or foreign tax law or interpretations of existing tax law, or adverse determinations by tax authorities, could increase our tax burden or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We are subject to taxation at the federal, state and local levels in the U.S. and other countries and jurisdictions. Our future effective tax rate could be affected by changes in the composition of earnings in jurisdictions with differing tax rates, changes in statutory rates and other legislative changes, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, or changes in determinations regarding the jurisdictions in which we are subject to tax. From time to time, the U.S. federal, state and local and foreign governments make substantive changes to tax rules and their application, which could result in materially higher taxes than would be incurred under existing tax law or interpretation and could adversely affect our profitability, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. State and local tax authorities have also increased their efforts to increase revenues through changes in tax law and audits. Such changes and proposals, if enacted, could increase our future effective income tax rates. We are subject to ongoing and periodic tax audits and disputes in various jurisdictions. An unfavorable outcome from any tax audit could result in higher tax costs, penalties and interest, thereby adversely impacting our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We are currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service and may be required to pay additional taxes.

The Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) is currently auditing the tax returns of La Quinta Corporation, one of our REITs, and BRE/LQ Operating Lessee Inc., one of our taxable REIT subsidiaries, in each case for calendar years 2010 and 2011. On January 9, 2014, we received a draft notice of proposed adjustment from the IRS in the amount of $158 million of additional tax for calendar years 2010 and 2011 in which the IRS has preliminarily asserted that the rent charged for these periods under the lease of hotel properties from the REIT to the taxable REIT subsidiary exceeded an arm’s length rent. The rent payable under such lease is based on a transfer pricing study prepared by an expert firm, and we believe that all such rent has been on an arm’s length basis. If, however, the IRS were successful in showing the rent charged was higher than the rent determined under any reasonable method, an excise tax would be imposed on the REIT equal to 100% of the excess rent. Such adjustments could also give rise to additional state income taxes. The IRS may raise similar issues with respect to subsequent taxable years of the REIT or taxable REIT subsidiary. The IRS may also raise other issues in the course of examining our tax returns that could result in additional proposed adjustments. We have reviewed the draft notice from the IRS, considered its content, and intend to seek additional input from the IRS. However, we continue to believe that the positions reported on our tax returns under audit by the IRS are, based on their

 

45


Table of Contents

technical merits, more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. Accordingly, as of September 30, 2013, we have not established any reserves related to this draft proposed adjustment or any other issues reflected on the returns under examination. If the IRS were successful in its challenges, we could owe additional taxes, interest and penalties, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow and the price of our common stock.

Although neither we nor our subsidiaries will be a REIT for United States federal income tax purposes following this offering, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the Existing Entities’ REIT status for previous years in which they elected REIT status. If the IRS were to successfully challenge the previous REIT status of any such entity, we may be required to pay additional taxes.

Certain of the Existing Entities elected to be treated as REITs for United States federal income tax purposes for taxable years ending on and prior to the date of this offering. Following consummation of this offering, neither we nor any of our subsidiaries will be REITs for United States federal income tax purposes. However, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the Existing Entities’ REIT qualification for previous years in which they elected REIT status. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code for which only a limited number of judicial or administrative interpretations exist. Although we believe that each of the Existing Entities that elected to be treated as a REIT met all of these requirements and qualified as a REIT in each of the years REIT status was elected, if the IRS were to successfully challenge the previous REIT status of any such entity, we could be liable for additional income taxes, interest and penalties, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow and the price of our common stock.

Changes to accounting rules or regulations may adversely affect our results of operations.

New accounting rules or regulations and varying interpretations of existing accounting rules or regulations have occurred and may occur in the future. A change in accounting rules or regulations may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective, and future changes to accounting rules or regulations or the questioning of current accounting practices may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. For example, in 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a revised exposure draft outlining proposed changes to current lease accounting in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification” or “ASC”) Topic 840, “Leases” and certain of our owned hotels are located on land that is leased from third parties. The proposed Accounting Standards Update, if ultimately adopted in its current form, could result in significant changes to current accounting, including the capitalization of leases on the balance sheet that currently are recorded off balance sheet as operating leases. While this change would not impact the cash flow related to our leased hotels and other leased assets, it could adversely impact our balance sheet and could therefore impact our ability to raise financing from banks or other sources.

 

46


Table of Contents

Risks relating to our indebtedness

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition, our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, our ability to operate our business, our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry and our ability to pay our debts and could expose us to interest rate risk to the extent of our variable debt and divert our cash flow from operations to make debt payments.

We have a significant amount of indebtedness. As of September 30, 2013, our total indebtedness was approximately $2.80 billion, or $             billion on a pro forma basis after giving effect to this offering and the application of the use of proceeds. Our substantial debt could have important consequences, including:

 

 

requiring a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, thereby reducing our ability to use our cash flow to fund our operations, capital expenditures and pursue future business opportunities;

 

 

increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic, industry or competitive developments;

 

 

exposing us to increased interest expense, as our degree of leverage may cause the interest rates of any future indebtedness (whether fixed or floating rate interest) to be higher than they would be otherwise;

 

 

exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates because certain of our indebtedness is at variable rates of interest;

 

 

making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness, and any failure to comply with the obligations of any of our debt instruments, including restrictive covenants, could result in an event of default that accelerates our obligation to repay indebtedness;

 

 

restricting us from making strategic acquisitions or causing us to make non-strategic divestitures;

 

 

limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, hotel development, satisfaction of debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes; and

 

 

limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business or market conditions and placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors who may be better positioned to take advantage of opportunities that our leverage prevents us from exploiting.

Furthermore, all of our debt currently matures in July 2014. We do not expect to have sufficient cash on hand to repay in full the balances expected to exist at that time. As such, we intend to refinance our current debt facilities prior to or concurrently with the consummation of this offering, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so on favorable terms or at all.

In addition, we are a holding company and substantially all of our consolidated assets are owned by, and most of our business is conducted through, our subsidiaries. Revenues from these subsidiaries are our primary source of funds for debt payments and operating expenses. If our subsidiaries are restricted from making distributions to us, that may impair our ability to meet

 

47


Table of Contents

our debt service obligations or otherwise fund our operations. Moreover, there may be restrictions on payments by subsidiaries to their parent companies under applicable laws, including laws that require companies to maintain minimum amounts of capital and to make payments to stockholders only from profits. As a result, although a subsidiary of ours may have cash, we may not be able to obtain that cash to satisfy our obligation to service our outstanding debt or fund our operations.

Servicing our indebtedness will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate sufficient cash depends on many factors, some of which are not within our control.

Our ability to make payments on our indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. To a certain extent, this is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt and meet our other commitments, we may need to restructure or refinance all or a portion of our debt, sell material assets or operations or raise additional debt or equity capital. We may not be able to effect any of these actions on a timely basis, on commercially reasonable terms or at all, and these actions may not be sufficient to meet our capital requirements. In addition, the terms of our existing or future debt arrangements may restrict us from effecting any of these alternatives. Our failure to make the required interest and principal payments on our indebtedness would result in an event of default under the agreement governing such indebtedness, which may result in the acceleration of some or all of our outstanding indebtedness.

Despite our current level of indebtedness, we may be able to incur substantially more debt and enter into other transactions, which could further exacerbate the risks to our financial condition described above.

We may be able to incur significant additional indebtedness in the future. Although the credit agreements and indentures that govern substantially all of our indebtedness contain restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness and entering into certain types of other transactions, these restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions. Additional indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. These restrictions also do not prevent us from incurring obligations, such as trade payables, that do not constitute indebtedness as defined under our debt instruments. To the extent new debt is added to our current debt levels, the substantial leverage risks described in the preceding two risk factors would increase.

Our existing debt agreements contain, and future debt agreements may contain, restrictions that may limit our flexibility in operating our business.

Our existing debt agreements contain, and documents governing our future indebtedness may contain, operating covenants that limit the discretion of management with respect to certain business matters. These covenants may place restrictions on, among other things, our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends and other distributions, make capital expenditures, make certain loans, investments and other restricted payments, enter into agreements restricting our subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends, engage in certain transactions with stockholders or affiliates, sell certain assets or engage in mergers, acquisitions and other business combinations, amend or otherwise alter the terms of our indebtedness, alter the business that we conduct, guarantee indebtedness or incur other contingent obligations and create liens. Additionally, the documents governing our future indebtedness may require us to meet certain financial ratios

 

48


Table of Contents

and tests. Our ability to comply with these and other provisions of our existing and future debt agreements is dependent on our future performance, which will be subject to many factors, some of which are beyond our control. The breach of any of these covenants or non-compliance with any of these financial ratios and tests could result in an event of default under the debt agreements, which, if not cured or waived, could result in acceleration of the related debt and the acceleration of debt under other instruments evidencing indebtedness that may contain cross-acceleration or cross-default provisions.

Risks related to this offering and ownership of our common stock

Our Sponsor controls us and its interests may conflict with ours or yours in the future.

Immediately following this offering, our Sponsor will beneficially own approximately     % of our common stock, or     % if the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase additional shares. Moreover, under our amended and restated bylaws and the stockholders’ agreement with our Sponsor that will be in effect by the completion of this offering, we will agree to nominate to our board individuals designated by our Sponsor, whom we refer to as the “Sponsor Directors,” according to the following scale (1) if our Sponsor continues to beneficially own at least     % of our stock, the lowest whole number that is greater than     % of the total number of directors comprising our board of directors; (2) if our Sponsor continues to beneficially own at least     % (but less than     %) of our stock, the lowest whole number that is at least     % of the total number of directors comprising our board of directors; (3) if our Sponsor continues to beneficially own at least     % (but less than     %) of our stock, the lowest whole number that is at least     % of the total number of directors comprising our board of directors; (4) if our Sponsor continues to beneficially own at least     % but less than     %) of our stock, the lowest whole number that is at least     % of the total number of directors comprising our board of directors; and (5) if our Sponsor continues to beneficially own at least     % (but less than     %) of our stock, the lowest whole number that is at least     % of the total number of directors comprising our board of directors. Therefore, even when our Sponsor ceases to own shares of our stock representing a majority of the total voting power, our Sponsor will still be able to significantly influence the composition of our board of directors and the approval of actions requiring stockholder approval. Accordingly, for such period of time, our Sponsor will have significant influence with respect to our management, business plans and policies, including the appointment and removal of our officers. In particular, for so long as our Sponsor continues to own a significant percentage of our stock, our Sponsor will be able to cause or prevent a change of control of our Company or a change in the composition of our board of directors and could preclude any unsolicited acquisition of our Company. The concentration of ownership could deprive you of an opportunity to receive a premium for your shares of common stock as part of a sale of our Company and ultimately might affect the market price of our common stock.

Our Sponsor engages in a broad spectrum of activities, including investments in real estate generally and in the hospitality industry in particular. In the ordinary course of their business activities, our Sponsor may engage in activities where their interests conflict with our interests or those of our stockholders. For example, our Sponsor owns interests in Extended Stay America, Inc., Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and G6 Hospitality, LLC, and certain other investments in the hotel industry that may compete directly or indirectly with us. As a result, they could have interests that could conflict with ours. Additionally, several of our directors sit on the board of directors of other companies in the hospitality industry. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that none of our Sponsor or any director who is not employed by us (including any non-

 

49


Table of Contents

employee director who serves as one of our officers in both his director and officer capacities) or his or her affiliates will have any duty to refrain from engaging, directly or indirectly, in the same business activities or similar business activities or lines of business in which we operate. Our Sponsor also may pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. In addition, our Sponsor may have an interest in having the Company pursue acquisitions, divestitures and other transactions that, in its judgment, could enhance its investment in the Company, even though such transactions might involve risks to you.

Upon the listing of our shares on                , we will be a “controlled company” within the meaning of such exchange’s rules and, as a result, will qualify for, and intend to rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. To the extent we rely on such exemptions, you will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such requirements.

After completion of this offering, our Sponsor will continue to control a majority of the combined voting power of all classes of our stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors. As a result, we will be a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of                . Under these rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power in the election of directors is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements. For example, controlled companies, within one year of the date of the listing of their common stock:

 

 

are not required to have a board that is composed of a majority of “independent directors,” as defined under the rules of such exchange;

 

 

are not required to have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors; and

 

 

are not required to have a nominating and corporate governance committee that is composed entirely of independent directors.

Following this offering, we intend to utilize these exemptions. As a result, we do not expect a majority of the directors on our board will be independent upon the closing of this offering. In addition, although we will have a fully independent audit committee, we do not expect that our compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees will consist entirely of independent directors. Accordingly, you will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of             .

We are an emerging growth company, and any decision on our part to comply with certain reduced reporting and disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies could make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an emerging growth company, and, for as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we currently intend to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies but not to “emerging growth companies,” including, but not limited to, not being required to have our independent registered public accounting firm audit our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our registration statements, periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the

 

50


Table of Contents

requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years following the completion of this offering. We will cease to be an emerging growth company upon the earliest of: (i) the end of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of this offering, (ii) the first fiscal year after our annual gross revenue are $1.0 billion or more, (iii) the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities or (iv) the end of any fiscal year in which the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeded $700 million as of the end of the second quarter of that fiscal year. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive if we choose to rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result of any choices to reduce future disclosure, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and the price of our common stock may be more volatile.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this accommodation allowing for delayed adoption of new or revised accounting standards, and, therefore, we will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

We will incur increased costs and become subject to additional regulations and requirements as a result of becoming a public company, which could lower our profits or make it more difficult to run our business.

As a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we have not incurred as a private company, including costs associated with public company reporting requirements. We also will incur costs associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and related rules implemented by the SEC. The expenses incurred by public companies generally for reporting and corporate governance purposes have been increasing. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly, although we are currently unable to estimate these costs with any degree of certainty. These laws and regulations also could make it more difficult or costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. These laws and regulations could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as our executive officers. Furthermore, if we are unable to satisfy our obligations as a public company, we could be subject to delisting of our common stock, fines, sanctions and other regulatory action and potentially civil litigation.

If we are unable to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price of our common stock may be negatively affected.

As a public company, we will be required to maintain internal controls over financial reporting and to report any material weaknesses in such internal controls. In addition, beginning with our second annual report on Form 10-K, we will be required to furnish a report by management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to express

 

51


Table of Contents

an opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting until after we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act. At such time, however, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not satisfied with the level at which our internal control over financial reporting is documented, designed or operating.

The process of designing, implementing, and testing the internal control over financial reporting required to comply with this obligation is time-consuming, costly, and complicated. If we identify material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, if we are unable to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in a timely manner or to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting once we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price of our common stock could be negatively affected, and we could become subject to investigations by the stock exchange on which our securities are listed, the SEC, or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources.

There may not be an active trading market for shares of our common stock, which may cause shares of our common stock to trade at a discount from the initial offering price and make it difficult to sell the shares of common stock you purchase.

Prior to this offering, there has not been a public trading market for shares of our common stock. It is possible that after this offering an active trading market will not develop or continue or, if developed, that any market will be sustained which would make it difficult for you to sell your shares of common stock at an attractive price or at all. The initial public offering price per share of common stock will be determined by agreement among us and the representatives of the underwriters, and may not be indicative of the price at which shares of our common stock will trade in the public market after this offering.

The market price of shares of our common stock may be volatile, which could cause the value of your investment to decline.

Even if a trading market develops, the market price of our common stock may be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations. Securities markets worldwide experience significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market or political conditions, could reduce the market price of shares of our common stock in spite of our operating performance. In addition, our operating results could be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors due to a number of potential factors, including variations in our quarterly operating results, additions or departures of key management personnel, failure to meet analysts’ earnings estimates, publication of research reports about our industry, litigation and government investigations, changes or proposed changes in laws or regulations or differing interpretations or enforcement thereof affecting our business, adverse market reaction to any indebtedness we may incur or securities we may issue in the future, changes in market valuations of similar companies or speculation in the press or investment community, announcements by our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, dispositions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments, adverse publicity about the industries we participate in or individual scandals, and in response the market price of shares of our common stock could decrease significantly. You may be unable to resell your shares of common stock at or above the initial public offering price.

 

52


Table of Contents

In the past few years, stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. In the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

We cannot assure you that we will pay dividends on our common stock, and our indebtedness could limit our ability to pay dividends on our common stock.

We do not currently have a policy regarding payment of dividends. We will determine our initial dividend polity prior to consummation of this offering. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among other things, our financial condition, results of operations, level of indebtedness, capital requirements, restrictions in our debt agreements, other contractual restrictions and the terms of any preferred stock, our business prospects and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. For more information, see “Dividend policy.”

Investors in this offering will suffer immediate and substantial dilution.

The initial public offering price per share of common stock will be substantially higher than our pro forma net tangible book value per share immediately after this offering. As a result, you will pay a price per share of common stock that substantially exceeds the per share book value of our tangible assets after subtracting our liabilities. In addition, you will pay more for your shares of common stock than the amounts paid by our existing owners. Assuming an offering price of $             per share of common stock, which is the midpoint of the range on the front cover of this prospectus, you will incur immediate and substantial dilution in an amount of $             per share of common stock. See “Dilution.”

You may be diluted by the future issuance of additional common stock in connection with our incentive plans, acquisitions or otherwise.

After this offering we will have approximately                 million shares of common stock authorized but unissued under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to become effective immediately prior to the consummation of this offering. We will be authorized to issue these shares of common stock and options, rights, warrants and appreciation rights relating to common stock for consideration and on terms and conditions established by our board of directors in its sole discretion, whether in connection with acquisitions or otherwise. We have reserved                 shares for issuance under our Omnibus Incentive Plan. See “Management—Executive compensation—Omnibus incentive plan.” Any common stock that we issue, including under our Omnibus Incentive Plan or other equity incentive plans that we may adopt in the future, would dilute the percentage ownership held by the investors who purchase common stock in this offering.

In the future, we may also issue our securities in connection with investments or acquisitions. The amount of shares of our common stock issued in connection with an investment or acquisition could constitute a material portion of our then-outstanding shares of common stock. Any issuance of additional securities in connection with investments or acquisitions may result in additional dilution to you.

 

53


Table of Contents

Future sales, or the perception of future sales, by us or our existing investors of additional shares of our common stock after this offering could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

The sale of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could harm the prevailing market price of shares of our common stock. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate. Upon completion of this offering we will have a total of                 shares of our common stock outstanding (or                 shares if the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase additional shares). Of the outstanding shares, the                 shares sold in this offering (or                 shares if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares) will be freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, except that any shares held by our affiliates, as that term is defined under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, may be sold only in compliance with the limitations described in “Shares eligible for future sale.”

The remaining outstanding                 shares of common stock held by our Sponsor, certain of our directors and officers and other existing owners after this offering will be subject to certain restrictions on resale. We, our officers, directors and holders of certain of our outstanding shares of common stock immediately prior to this offering, including Blackstone, will sign lock-up agreements with the underwriters that will, subject to certain exceptions, restrict the sale of the shares of our common stock held by them for 180 days following the date of this prospectus.                 may, in its sole discretion and without notice, release all or any portion of the shares of common stock subject to lock-up agreements. See “Underwriting” for a description of these lock-up agreements.

Upon the expiration of the lock-up agreements described above, all of such                 shares (or shares if the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase additional shares) will be eligible for resale in a public market, subject, in the case of shares held by our affiliates, to volume, manner of sale and other limitations under Rule 144. We expect that our Sponsor will be considered an affiliate 180 days after this offering based on their expected share ownership (consisting of                 shares), as well as their board nomination rights. Certain other of our shareholders may also be considered affiliates at that time. In addition, commencing 180 days following this offering, the holders of these shares of common stock will have the right, subject to certain exceptions and conditions, to require us to register their shares of common stock under the Securities Act, and they will have the right to participate in future registrations of securities by us. Registration of any of these outstanding shares of common stock would result in such shares becoming freely tradable without compliance with Rule 144 upon effectiveness of the registration statement. See “Shares eligible for future sale.”

As restrictions on resale end or if these stockholders exercise their registration rights, the market price of our shares of common stock could drop significantly if the holders of these restricted shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to raise additional funds through future offerings of our shares of common stock or other securities.

We intend to file one or more registration statements on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock issued pursuant to our Omnibus Incentive Plan. Any such Form S-8 registration statements will automatically become effective upon filing. Accordingly, shares registered under

 

54


Table of Contents

such registration statements will be available for sale in the open market. We expect that the initial registration statement on Form S-8 will cover                 shares of our common stock.

Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and Delaware law might discourage or delay acquisition attempts for us that you might consider favorable.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, which will become effective immediately prior to the consummation of this offering, will contain provisions that may make the merger or acquisition of our Company more difficult without the approval of our board of directors. Among other things:

 

 

although we do not have a stockholder rights plan, and would either submit any such plan to stockholders for ratification or cause such plan to expire within a year, these provisions would allow us to authorize the issuance of undesignated preferred stock in connection with a stockholder rights plan or otherwise, the terms of which may be established and the shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or preferences superior to the rights of the holders of common stock;

 

 

these provisions prohibit stockholder action by written consent from and after the date on which the parties to our stockholders’ agreement cease to beneficially own at least            % of the total voting power of all then outstanding shares of our capital stock unless such action is recommended by all directors then in office;

 

 

these provisions provide that the board of directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal our amended and restated bylaws and that our stockholders may only amend our amended and restated bylaws with the approval of             % or more of all of the outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote; and

 

 

these provisions establish advance notice requirements for nominations for elections to our board or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.

Further, as a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Delaware law, which may impair a takeover attempt that our stockholders may find beneficial. These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions under Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our Company, including actions that our stockholders may deem advantageous, or negatively affect the trading price of our common stock. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions you desire.

 

55


Table of Contents

Special note regarding forward-looking statements

This prospectus contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. All statements, other than statements of historical facts included in this prospectus, including statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, beliefs, business strategies, future events, business conditions, our results of operations, financial position and our business outlook, business trends and other information referred to under “Prospectus summary,” “Risk factors,” “Dividend policy,” “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” and “Business” are forward-looking statements. When used in this prospectus, the words “estimates,” “expects,” “contemplates,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “plans,” “intends,” “believes,” “forecasts,” “may,” “should” and variations of such words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts, and are based upon our current expectations, beliefs, estimates and projections, and various assumptions, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and beyond our control. Our expectations, beliefs, estimates and projections are expressed in good faith and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them. However, there can be no assurance that management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates and projections will result or be achieved and actual results may vary materially from what is expressed in or indicated by the forward-looking statements.

There are a number of risks, uncertainties and other important factors, many of which are beyond our control, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus. Such risks, uncertainties and other important factors include, among others, the risks, uncertainties and factors set forth above under “Risk factors,” and the following risks, uncertainties and factors:

 

 

business, financial, and operating risks inherent to the hospitality industry;

 

 

macroeconomic and other factors beyond our control can adversely which affect and reduce demand for hotel rooms;

 

 

contraction in the global economy or low levels of economic growth;

 

 

inability to compete effectively;

 

 

any deterioration in the quality or reputation of our brand;

 

 

inability to develop our pipeline;

 

 

the geographic concentration of our hotels;

 

 

delays or increased expense relating to our efforts to develop, redevelop or renovate our hotels;

 

 

inability by us or our franchisees to make necessary investments to maintain the quality and reputation of our brand;

 

 

inability to access capital necessary for growth;

 

 

seasonal and cyclical volatility in the hotel industry;

 

 

inability to maintain good relationships with our franchisees;

 

56


Table of Contents
 

inability to protect our brand standards;

 

 

risks resulting from significant investments in owned real estate;

 

 

failure to keep pace with developments in technology;

 

 

failures or interruptions in, material damage to, or difficulties in updating, our information technology systems, software or websites;

 

 

inability to protect our guests’ personal information;

 

 

failure to comply with marketing and advertising laws;

 

 

disruptions to our reservation system;

 

 

failure to protect our trademarks and other intellectual property;

 

 

risks of doing business internationally;

 

 

the loss of senior executives or key field personnel;

 

 

our substantial indebtedness; and

 

 

Blackstone’s control of us.

There may be other factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements, including factors disclosed under the sections entitled “Risk factors” and “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” in this prospectus. You should evaluate all forward-looking statements made in this prospectus in the context of these risks and uncertainties.

We caution you that the risks, uncertainties and other factors referenced above may not contain all of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that are important to you. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will realize the results, benefits or developments that we expect or anticipate or, even if substantially realized, that they will result in the consequences or affect us or our business in the way expected. All forward-looking statements in this prospectus apply only as of the date made and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this prospectus. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

 

57


Table of Contents

Our pre-IPO transactions and organizational structure

Our business is currently conducted, and our hotel properties are currently owned, through multiple entities (including the Predecessor Entities and entities that own the Previously Managed Portfolio, collectively, the “Existing Entities”). The Existing Entities are separately owned (directly and indirectly) by seventeen real estate investment fund entities and other entities affiliated with our Sponsor, principally including Blackstone Real Estate Partners IV L.P. and Blackstone Real Estate Partners V L.P. and their affiliates, and certain members of our management, whom we refer to collectively as our “existing owners.” Certain of the Existing Entities operated as real estate investment trusts, or REITs, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which reduced the amount of taxes we owed.

The Issuer is a newly formed entity, formed for the purpose of effecting the Pre-IPO Transactions (as defined below) and this offering, and has engaged in no business or activities other than in connection with the Pre-IPO Transactions and this offering.

In order to effectuate this offering, we expect to effect the following series of transactions to occur at various times prior to and/or concurrently with the closing of this offering, which will result in a reorganization of our business (the “Pre-IPO Transactions”):

 

 

each of Lodge S-Holdings Inc., Lodge Holdings Inc. and La Quinta Corporation, which are the REIT subsidiaries of the Existing Entities, will redeem its shares of capital stock from its third-party shareholders for cash and convert into a limited liability company;

 

 

Holdco III will purchase the membership interests in an entity that owns, directly or indirectly, the Previously Managed Portfolio;

 

 

the equity interests in the Holdcos held by the existing owners will be exchanged by the existing owners for an aggregate of                  shares of common stock of the Issuer, assuming an initial public offering price of $                 per share, which is the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus (see “Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management” for share ownership of Blackstone and certain members of our management following this exchange); and

 

 

LQ Management L.L.C. will be sold to a subsidiary of Holdco I for cash.

 

58


Table of Contents

The following is a simplified depiction of our Company following the Pre-IPO Transactions:

 

LOGO

 

(1)   See “Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management” for share ownership of Sponsor and certain members of our management following the Pre-IPO Transactions.

 

(2)   Ownership percentages assume an initial public offering price of $                 per share, which is the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus.

The purpose of the Pre-IPO Transactions is to enable us to complete a public offering of all of the business previously conducted by the Existing Entities.

Except where otherwise expressly indicated or the context otherwise requires, this prospectus reflects the completion of the Pre-IPO Transactions. See “Basis of presentation.”

 

59


Table of Contents

Use of proceeds

We estimate that we will receive net proceeds from this offering of approximately $                 million (or approximately $                 if the underwriters fully exercise their option to purchase additional shares of common stock), in each case assuming an initial public offering price of $                 per share, which is the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

An increase (decrease) of 1,000,000 shares from the expected number of shares to be sold by us in this offering, assuming no change in the assumed initial public offering price per share, which is the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) our net proceeds from this offering by $                 million. A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $                 per share, based on the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering by $                 million, assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to repay certain of our then outstanding indebtedness. Any remaining net proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes.

 

60


Table of Contents

Dividend policy

We will determine our initial dividend policy prior to consummation of this offering. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among other things, our financial condition, results of operations, cash requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. Because we are a holding company, and have no direct operations, we will only be able to pay dividends from funds we receive from our subsidiaries.

For a description of distributions made by the Predecessor Entities on their equity interests in 2012, 2011 and in the first nine months of 2013, see our consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

61


Table of Contents

Capitalization

The following tables set forth our cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of September 30, 2013:

 

 

on a historical basis after giving effect to the Pre-IPO Transactions (other than the acquisition of the Previously Managed Portfolio);

 

 

on a pro forma basis to give effect to the acquisition of the Previously Managed Portfolio;

 

 

on a pro forma as adjusted basis to further give effect to (1) the sale by us of approximately                 shares of common stock in this offering, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us, and (2) the application of the estimated net proceeds from the offering, as described in “Use of proceeds,” at an assumed initial public offering price of $                 per share, which is the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus.

The information below is illustrative only and our capitalization following the offering will be adjusted based on the actual initial public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing.

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents are not components of our total capitalization. You should read these tables in conjunction with the information contained in “Use of proceeds,” “Selected financial and other data,” “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” and “Description of indebtedness,” as well as the combined financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

      As of September 30, 2013  
(amounts in thousands, except shares and per share data)    Historical     Pro forma(1)      Pro forma as
further
adjusted for
this offering(1)
 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 48,954      $                        $                    

Restricted cash and cash equivalents(2)

     128,003        

Total

   $ 176,957      $         $     
  

 

 

 

Total debt

   $ 2,799,743      $         $     

Stockholders’ equity:

       

Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 1,000 shares authorized and 100 shares issued and outstanding on a historical basis;              shares authorized and              issued and outstanding on a pro forma basis; and              shares authorized and              issued and outstanding on a pro forma as adjusted basis

     —          

Additional paid in capital

     —          

Retained earnings

     —          

Total stockholders’ equity

     323,768        

Non-controlling interests

     (11,223     

Total equity

     312,545        

Total capitalization

   $ 3,112,288      $         $     

 

 

 

62


Table of Contents
(1)   To the extent we change the number of shares of common stock sold by us in this offering from the shares we expect to sell or we change the initial public offering price from the assumed initial offering price of $                 per share, which is the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, or any combination of these events occurs, the net proceeds to us from this offering and each of total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization may increase or decrease. A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price per share of common stock, assuming no change in the number of shares of common stock to be sold, would increase (decrease) the net proceeds that we receive in this offering and each of total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization by approximately $                 million. An increase (decrease) of 1,000,000 shares in the expected number of shares to be sold in the offering, assuming no change in the assumed initial offering price per share, would increase (decrease) our net proceeds from this offering and our total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization by approximately $                 million. In addition, the number of shares of common stock in the table above does not include the shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our Omnibus Incentive Plan. See “Management—Executive compensation—Omnibus incentive plan.”

 

(2)   The majority of our restricted cash and cash equivalents balances relates to prefunded cash reserves for our existing debt and cash collateral for our self-insurance programs. The prefunded cash reserves are required under the terms of the agreements related to our mortgage loans.

 

63


Table of Contents

Dilution

If you invest in our common stock in this offering, your ownership interest in us will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the initial public offering price per share of our common stock and the net tangible book value per share of common stock after this offering. Dilution results from the fact that the per share offering price of the common stock is substantially in excess of the net tangible book value per share attributable to the shares of common stock held by the existing owners.

Our historical net tangible book value as of September 30, 2013 was approximately $                 million, or $                 per share of our common stock, based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding not including the shares of common stock to be issued in this offering (after giving effect to the consummation of the Pre-IPO Transactions). We calculate net tangible book value per share by taking the amount of our total tangible assets, reduced by the amount of our total liabilities, and then dividing that amount by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding not including the shares of common stock to be issued in this offering (after giving effect to the consummation of the Pre-IPO Transactions).

After giving effect to our sale of the shares in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $                 per share, the mid-point of the range described on the cover of this prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us, our pro forma net tangible book value as of September 30, 2013 would have been $                , or $                 per share of common stock. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $                 per share of common stock to our existing owners and an immediate and substantial dilution in net tangible book value of $                 per share of common stock to investors in this offering at the assumed initial public offering price.

The following table illustrates this dilution on a per share of common stock basis assuming the underwriters do not exercise their option to purchase additional shares of common stock:

 

Assumed initial public offering price per share of common stock

            $                

Historical net tangible book value per share of common stock as of September 30, 2013 before the change attributable to investors in this offering(1)

   $                  

Increase in net tangible book value per share of common stock attributable to investors in this offering

   $       
  

 

 

 

Pro forma net tangible book value per share of common stock after the offering

      $     
  

 

 

 

Dilution per share of common stock to investors in this offering

      $     

 

 

 

(1)   Historical net tangible book value per share is based on the historical book value of the Predecessor Entities as of September 30, 2013 divided by the number of shares expected to be issued in the Pre-IPO Transactions.

A $1.00 increase in the assumed initial public offering price of $                 per share of our common stock would increase our pro forma net tangible book value after giving to the offering by $                 million, or by $                 per share of our common stock, assuming the number of shares offered by us remains the same and after deducting the underwriting discount and the estimated offering expenses payable by us. A $1.00 decrease in the assumed initial public offering price per share would result in equal changes in the opposite direction.

 

64


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes, on the pro forma basis described above as of September 30, 2013, the total number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the total cash consideration paid to us, and the average price per share paid by existing owners and by new investors. As the table shows, new investors purchasing shares in this offering will pay an average price per share substantially higher than our existing owners paid. The table below assumes an initial public offering price of $             per share, the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus, for shares purchased in this offering and excludes underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us:

 

      Shares of common
stock
purchased
     Total
consideration
    

Average
price per
share of
common

stock

 
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share
amounts)
   Number    Percent      Amount      Percent     

 

 

Existing owners

            %       $                          %       $               

Investors in this offering

            %       $               %       $    
  

 

 

Total

        100.0%       $           100.0%       $    

 

 

Each $1.00 increase in the assumed offering price of $                 per share would increase total consideration paid by investors in this offering and total consideration paid by all stockholders by $                 million, assuming the number of shares offered by us remains the same and after deducting the underwriting discount and the estimated offering expenses payable by us. A $1.00 decrease in the assumed initial public offering price per share would result in equal changes in the opposite direction.

The table above does not give effect to the shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. See “Management—Executive compensation—Omnibus incentive plan.”

The dilution information above is for illustration purposes only. Our net tangible book value following the consummation of this offering is subject to adjustment based on the actual initial public offering price of our shares and other terms of this offering determined at pricing.

 

65


Table of Contents

Unaudited pro forma financial information

The following unaudited pro forma combined financial data for the year ended December 31, 2013 has been prepared to reflect (1) the Pre-IPO Transactions (including the acquisition of the Previously Managed Portfolio) and (2) the issuance of              shares of our common stock offered by us in this offering and the application of the estimated net proceeds thereof (as described in “Use of proceeds”), in each case, at an assumed initial public offering price of $             per share, which is the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus. The pro forma financial information is presented as if this offering and the Pre-IPO Transactions (including the acquisition of the Previously Managed Portfolio) all had occurred on December 31, 2013 for the purposes of the unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet and on January 1, 2013 for the purposes of the unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations. The unaudited pro forma combined financial data excludes the Hotels Designated for Sale and the Baymont Hotels (other than the information relating to discontinued operations).

The pro forma adjustments are based on preliminary estimates, accounting judgments and currently available information and assumptions that management believes are reasonable. The notes to the unaudited pro forma statements provide a detailed discussion of how such adjustments were derived and presented in the unaudited pro forma financial information. The unaudited pro forma financial information should be read in conjunction with “Capitalization,” “Use of proceeds,” “Selected financial and other data,” “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations,” our combined financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus and the financial statements of the Previously Managed Portfolio and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.

The unaudited pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the actual financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2013 or what the actual results of operations of the Company would have been assuming this offering and our Pre-IPO Transactions had been completed on the first day of the period presented, nor for the period presented is it indicative of the results of operations of future periods. A number of factors may affect our results. See “Risk factors” and “Special note regarding forward-looking statements.”

 

66


Table of Contents

La Quinta Holdings Inc.

Unaudited pro forma financial information

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2013

 

(in thousands)   Predecessor
entities
  Previously
managed
portfolio
(“PMP”)
  Eliminations   Purchase
price
adjustment
  Predecessor
and PMP
pro forma
subtotal
  Debt
refinancing /
equity
offering
  Pro forma

 

Statement of Operations Data:

             

Revenues:

             

Room revenues

             

Franchise and other fee-based revenues

             

Other hotel revenues

             
 

 

Brand marketing fund revenues from franchised and managed properties

             
 

 

Total revenues

             

Operating Expenses:

             

Direct lodging expenses

             

Depreciation and amortization

             

General and administrative expenses

             

Other lodging and operating expenses

             

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses

             
 

 

Brand marketing fund expenses from franchised and managed properties

             
 

 

Total operating expenses

             
 

 

Operating Income

             

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

             

Income from continuing operations, net of tax

             

Net Income (loss)

             

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest

             
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to the Company

             

Selected Balance Sheet Data:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

             

Restricted cash

             

Total assets

             

Total debt(1)

             

Total equity (deficit)

             

Operating Data (based on comparable hotels)(2):

             

Number of hotels

             

Number of rooms

             

Hotel occupancy

             

Hotel ADR

             

Hotel RevPAR

             

 

 

(1)   Includes current portion.

 

(2)   Operating data are for comparable hotels on a system-wide basis as of each period end. See the definition of comparable hotels in “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—Key indicators of financial condition and operating performance—Comparable hotels.”

 

67


Table of Contents

Selected financial and other data

Our historical financial statements were prepared by combining the financial results of the entities expected to be owned by the Company at the completion of this offering, including those entities under common control and their consolidated subsidiaries, which corresponds to the results of operations for the Company on a prospective basis after giving effect to the consummation of the Pre-IPO Transactions and this offering. The table below does not include the acquisition of the Previously Managed Portfolio as such hotels are not under common control prior to their acquisition by the Company in connection with the Pre-IPO Transactions. Further, the information provided below (other than the information relating to discontinued operations) does not include the Hotels Designated for Sale and the Baymont Hotels.

We derived the selected statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 and the selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 from the audited combined financial statements of the Predecessor Entities included elsewhere in this prospectus. We derived the selected statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 from the audited combined financial statements of the Predecessor Entities which are not included in this prospectus. We derived the selected statement of operations data for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2013 from the unaudited condensed combined financial statements of the Predecessor Entities included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have prepared the unaudited condensed combined financial statements on the same basis as the audited combined financial statements and, in our opinion, have included all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly in all material respects our financial position and results of operations. The results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. Additionally, historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for any future period.

 

68


Table of Contents

You should read the selected condensed combined financial data below together with the combined financial statements including the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, as well as “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” and “Description of indebtedness,” and the other financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

     Nine months  ended
September 30,
    Years ended December 31,  
(in thousands)   2013     2012     2012     2011     2010     2009     2008  

 

 

Statement of Operations Data:

             

Revenues:

             

Room revenues

  $ 585,294      $ 552,459      $ 714,143      $ 660,816      $ 623,720      $ 610,395      $ 744,999   

Franchising and other fee-based revenues

    59,846        52,054        69,206        59,314        52,074        40,716        41,985   

Other hotel revenues

    13,650        12,655        17,506        16,229        16,821        16,743        17,600   
 

 

 

 
    658,790        617,168        800,855        736,359        692,615        667,854        804,584   

Brand marketing fund revenues from franchised and managed properties

    14,594        13,139        17,157        15,182        13,238        11,790        11,377   
 

 

 

 

Total revenues

    673,384        630,307        818,012        751,541        705,853        679,644        815,961   
 

 

 

 

Operating Expenses:

             

Direct lodging expenses

    264,208        251,552        334,394        330,205        305,856        302,742        332,033   

Depreciation and amortization

    122,694        116,501        155,879        149,356        141,708        135,303        126,830   

General and administrative expenses

    49,724        50,575        74,111        61,578        63,828        56,449        65,779   

Other lodging and operating expenses

    39,666        36,448        58,266        47,791        49,623        56,190        58,758   

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses

    54,226        44,475        48,610        45,580        42,516        36,179        40,526   
 

 

 

 
    530,518        499,551        671,260        634,510        603,531        586,863        623,926   
 

 

 

 

Brand marketing fund expenses from franchised and managed properties

    14,594        13,139        17,157        15,182        13,238        11,790        11,377   

Total operating expenses

    545,112        512,690        688,417        649,692        616,769        598,653        635,303   

Operating Income

    128,272        117,617        129,595        101,849        89,084        80,991        180,658   

Other Income (Expenses):

             

Interest expense, net

    (110,746     (66,892     (103,124     (51,611     (50,469     (54,961     (144,927

Impairment loss

                                              (15,102

Other income (loss)

    1,057        (7,374     (7,440     (662     1,483        2,115        1,094   

Gain on extinguishment of debt, net

           1,192        1,192        11,451        40,494                 
 

 

 

 

Total other income (expenses)

    (109,689     (73,074     (109,372     (40,822     (8,492     (52,846     (158,935
 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

    18,583        44,543        20,223        61,027        80,592        28,145        21,723   

Income tax expense

    (2,526     (1,906     (3,135     (2,332     (2,459     1,634        (1,368
 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations, net of tax

    16,057        42,637        17,088        58,695        78,133        29,779        20,355   

Gain (loss) on discontinued operations, net of tax

    (6,303     (623     (52,852     244        (12,150     2,145        8,827   
 

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss)

  $ 9,754      $ 42,014      $ (35,764   $ 58,939      $ 65,983      $ 31,924      $ 29,182   

Net (Income) Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

    (1,106     4,233        4,810        4,574        2,845        5,219        1,103   
 

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to the Company

  $ 8,648      $ 46,247      $ (30,954   $ 63,513      $ 68,828      $ 37,143      $ 30,285   

 

 

 

69


Table of Contents
     As of
September 30,
    As of December 31,  
(in thousands)   2013     2012     2011     2010     2009     2008  

 

 

Selected Balance Sheet Data:

           

Cash and cash equivalents

    48,954        40,813        90,857        41,139        41,163        49,225   

Restricted cash

    136,596        113,407        60,745        61,243        44,705        48,916   

Total assets

    3,273,947        3,356,320        3,484,232        3,494,905        3,569,298        3,694,320   

Total debt(1)

    2,799,743        2,899,965        3,158,409        3,320,829        3,406,709        3,406,824   

Total equity (deficit)

    312,545        303,385        183,095        39,597        36,278        120,542   

 

 

 

(1)   Includes current portion

 

70


Table of Contents

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations

The following discussion should be read together with “Our pre-IPO transactions and organizational structure,” “Selected financial and other data,” “Unaudited pro forma financial information,” and the historical combined financial statements and the notes thereto of the Company included elsewhere in this prospectus.

The information in this “Management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations” reflects the combined financial results of the entities expected to be owned by the Company at the completion of this offering and previously under common control (Lodge Holdco I LLC, Lodge Holdco II LLC and Lodge Holdco III LLC, collectively, the “Holdcos”) and their consolidated subsidiaries, which corresponds to the results of operations for the Company on a prospective basis after giving effect to the consummation of the Pre-IPO Transactions and this offering. The information in this section does not include the acquisition of the Previously Managed Portfolio as such hotels are not under common control prior to their acquisition by the Company in connection with the Pre-IPO Transactions. Since 2006, LQ Management L.L.C., an eligible independent contractor (within the meaning of Section 856(d)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) that is consolidated for financial reporting purposes by the Holdcos, has managed the Previously Managed Portfolio under a management agreement with the owner of the Previously Managed Portfolio, an affiliate. Further, the discussion (other than the discussion of discontinued operations) in this section does not include the 11 Baymont-branded hotels (the “Baymont Hotels”) and the 16 La Quinta-branded hotels that were sold prior to September 30, 2013, or the 17 La Quinta-branded hotels designated as held for sale as of September 30, 2013 (the “Hotels Designated for Sale”). Sales of 13 of the Hotels Designated for Sale have already closed, and we expect that we will sell the remaining 4 Hotels Designated for Sale prior to the consummation of this offering.

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs and involve numerous risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those described in the “Risk factors” section of this prospectus. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. You should carefully read “Risk factors” and “Special note regarding forward-looking statements.”

Overview

Our business

We are a leading owner, operator and franchisor of select-service hotels primarily serving the midscale and upper-midscale segments under the La Quinta brand. According to data provided by STR, La Quinta is the fastest growing principal select-service hotel brand in the United States in these segments in terms of percentage growth of number of hotels over the last ten years ended December 31, 2012, significantly outpacing the percentage growth of our main STR competitive set in percentage terms. Our system-wide portfolio, as of September 30, 2013 (other than our discontinued operations) consisted of 819 hotels representing approximately 82,000 rooms located predominantly across 46 U.S. states, as well as in Canada and Mexico, of which 339 hotels were owned and operated and 480 were franchised or managed. We also have a pipeline of 175 franchised hotels in the United States, Mexico, Canada, Colombia and Honduras. We primarily derive our revenues from owned hotel operations and fees generated from franchised hotels.

 

71


Table of Contents

All of our long-lived assets are located in the United States and, in 2012, we derived over 99% of our revenue from within the United States.

Segments

Our operating segments are components of the business which are managed discretely and for which discrete financial information is reviewed regularly by our chief operating decision maker to assess performance and make decisions regarding the allocation of resources. Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive Officer. We define our reportable segments as follows:

 

 

Owned hotels—This segment derives its earnings from the operation of owned hotel properties located in the United States.

 

 

Franchise and management—This segment derives its earnings primarily from revenues earned under various franchise and management agreements relating to our owned, franchised and managed hotels. These agreements provide for us to earn compensation for the licensing of our brand to franchisees, for providing certain services (including hotel management services) and for providing access to certain shared services and marketing programs such as reservations, La Quinta Returns, and property management systems. Other than with respect to the Previously Managed Portfolio, which is reflected as managed hotels in this “Management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations” section, we do not currently generate, and did not generate over the periods presented, any revenue from the management of hotel operations for third parties.

Our segment information also reflects corporate and other which includes revenues generated by and related to and operating expenses incurred in connection with the overall support and brand management of our owned, managed and franchised hotels and operations.

We have a business model that involves both ownership of properties and franchising of third-party owned properties. This provides us with a diversified revenue and income streams that balance both the advantages and risks associated with these lines of business.

As an owner of hotels, we can capture the full benefit of increases in operating profits during periods of increasing demand or ADR. The cost structure of our typical hotel is more fixed than variable, so as demand and ADR increase over time, the pace of increase in operating profits typically is higher than the pace of increase of revenues. Hotel ownership is, however, more capital intensive than franchising hotels to third-party owners, as we are responsible for the costs and capital expenditures for our owned hotels. The profits realized by us in our Owned Hotels segment are generally more significantly affected by economic downturns and declines in revenues than the results of our Franchise and Management segment. See also “—Key components and factors affecting our results of operations—Expenses” and “Risk factors—Risks related to our business and industry.”

As a franchisor of hotels, growth in the number of franchised hotels and earnings from franchises typically results in higher overall returns on invested capital because the capital required to build and maintain franchised hotels is typically provided by the owner of the respective property with minimal or no capital required by us, as franchisor. During periods of increasing demand, we do not, however, share in most of the benefits of increases in profits from franchised hotels because franchisees do not pay us fees based on profits. A principal component of our current growth strategy is to focus our expansion on our franchise business.

 

72


Table of Contents

For purposes of this “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations,” the following table sets forth the number of net owned, franchised and managed hotels as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

 

      As of September 30,
2013
     As of December 31,  
        2012      2011      2010  

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Owned Hotels:

           

Owned Hotels

     356         372         372         372   

Discontinued Operations

     17         33         33         33   

Net Owned Hotels

     339         339         339         339   

Franchised/Managed Hotels:

           

Franchised Hotels

     466         449         430         422   

Managed Hotels

     14         14         14         14   

Total Franchised/Managed Hotels

     480         463         444         436   

Total Net Owned and Franchised/Managed Hotels

     819         802         783         775   

 

 

Seasonality

The hotel industry is seasonal in nature. Generally, our revenues are greater in the second and third quarters than in the first and fourth quarters. The timing of holidays can also impact our quarterly results. The periods during which our properties experience higher revenues vary from property to property and depend principally upon location. This seasonality can be expected to cause quarterly fluctuations in revenue, profit margins and net earnings. Further, the timing of opening of newly constructed or franchised hotels and the timing of any hotel acquisitions or dispositions may cause a variation of revenue and earnings from quarter to quarter.

Inflation

We do not believe that inflation had a material effect on our business during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, or the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. Although we believe that increases in the rate of inflation will generally result in comparable increases in hotel room rates, severe inflation could contribute to a slowing of the U.S. economy. Such a slowdown could result in a reduction in room rates and occupancy levels, negatively impacting our revenues and net income.

Key components and factors affecting our results of operations

Revenues

We primarily derive our revenues from the following sources:

 

 

Room revenues.    Represents revenues derived from hotel operations which are almost exclusively driven by room rentals. Our Owned Hotels revenue is primarily derived from three categories of guests: leisure, corporate and group.

 

 

Franchise fees.    Represents revenues derived from franchise fees received in connection with the franchising of our brand, and other revenue generated by the incidental support of hotel operations for franchised hotels. Franchise fees consist of an initial application fee upon the entry of a new hotel into the system and a monthly royalty fee, generally calculated as a

 

73


Table of Contents
 

percentage of gross room revenue. As new franchised hotels are established in our franchise system, we expect the franchise fees received from such hotels to increase over time as they establish their presence in the marketplace and stabilize their operations.

 

 

Management fees.    Represents revenues derived from management fees received in connection with the management of day-to-day hotel operations, and other revenue generated by the incidental support of hotel operations for these properties. Management fees are generally calculated as a percentage of gross room revenue. Following consummation of the Pre-IPO Transactions and this offering, we do not expect to have any management fees.

 

 

Other hotel revenues.    Other hotel revenues include revenues generated by the incidental support of hotel operations for owned hotels, including charges to guests for vending commissions, meeting and banquet room revenue, laundry services, and other rental income from operating leases associated with leasing space for restaurants, billboards and cell towers.

 

 

Brand marketing fund revenues from franchised and managed properties.    These revenues represent the fees collected from our franchised and managed hotels related to our BMF, which is calculated as a percentage of gross room revenues. The corresponding expenses are presented as other expenses from franchised and managed properties in our combined statements of operations, resulting in no impact to operating income or net income.

Consumer demand for our services is closely linked to the performance of the general economy and is sensitive to business and personal discretionary spending levels. Declines in consumer demand due to adverse general economic conditions, risks affecting or reducing travel patterns, lower consumer confidence and adverse political conditions can lower the revenues and profitability of our owned hotels and the amount of franchise fee revenues we are able to generate from our franchised hotels. As a result, changes in consumer demand and general business cycles can subject, and have subjected, our revenues to significant volatility. See “Risk factors—Risks related to our business and industry” and “Industry.”

In addition to general economic conditions, our guest satisfaction scores, the location of our hotels, the expenditures that we and our franchisees incur to improve our hotels, our loyalty program and the quality of our service impact our ADR, occupancy rates, RevPAR and RevPAR Index performance (each of which is described below under “—Key indicators of financial condition and operating performance”). Changes in ADR, occupancy, RevPAR and RevPAR Index performance significantly impact our revenues.

Expenses

We primarily incur the following expenses:

 

 

Direct lodging expenses and other lodging and operating expenses.    Direct lodging and Other lodging and operating expenses reflect the operating expenses of our owned hotels, including both direct and indirect hotel operating expenses. Direct lodging expenses include items such as compensation costs for hotel level management, housekeeping, laundry and front desk staff, supply costs for guest room amenities and laundry, repairs and maintenance, utilities, sales and local marketing, bad debt expenses related to direct-bill corporate customers, and online and offline travel agency commissions. Other lodging and operating expenses include indirect property operating expenses, primarily property taxes and insurance.

 

74


Table of Contents
 

Depreciation and amortization.    These are non-cash expenses that primarily consist of depreciation of fixed assets such as buildings, furniture, fixtures and equipment at our owned hotels, as well as certain corporate assets. Amortization expense primarily consists of amortization of intangibles related to our franchise business and other leasehold interests, which are amortized over their estimated useful lives.

 

 

General and administrative expenses.    General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation expense for our corporate staff and personnel supporting our business segments, professional fees (including consulting, audit and legal fees), travel and entertainment expenses, contractual performance obligations and office administrative and related expenses.

 

 

Impairment losses.    We hold amortizing and non-amortizing intangible assets and long-lived assets. We evaluate these assets for impairment as further discussed in “—Critical accounting policies and estimates.” These evaluations have, in the past, resulted in impairment losses for certain of these assets based on the specific facts and circumstances surrounding those assets and our estimates of the fair value of those assets. Based on economic conditions or other factors at a hotel-specific or company-wide level, we may be required to take additional impairment losses to reflect further declines in our asset and/or investment values.

 

 

Brand marketing fund expenses from franchised and managed properties.    These expenses represent the expenditure of BMF fees collected from our franchised and managed hotels for marketing and other support of the La Quinta brand. The corresponding revenues are presented as other revenues from franchised and managed properties in our combined statements of operations, resulting in no impact to operating income or net income.

 

 

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses.    These expenses include advertising costs associated with general promotion of the La Quinta brand and specific advertising and marketing support for our operation and for the operations of our franchisees, which are in addition to the expenditure of BMF fees collected from franchised and managed properties for the same purpose.

Fluctuations in operating expenses at our owned hotels can be related to various factors, including changes in occupancy rates, which directly impact certain variable expenses including labor, supplies, utilities and other operating expenses. However, certain of our expenses are relatively fixed, including rent, property taxes, liability insurance and, to a certain extent, payroll. As market conditions dictate, we take steps to reduce both our variable and fixed costs to levels we feel are appropriate to maximize profitability and respond to market conditions without jeopardizing the overall guest experience or the value of our hotels or brand. In addition, changes in depreciation expenses may be impacted by renovations of existing hotels or the disposition of existing hotels through sale or closure. For other factors affecting our costs and expenses, see “Risk factors—Risks related to our business and industry.”

Key indicators of financial condition and operating performance

We use a variety of financial and other information in monitoring the financial condition and operating performance of our business. Some of this information is financial information that is prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, while other information may be financial in nature and may not be prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our management also uses other information that may not be

 

75


Table of Contents

financial in nature, including statistical information and comparative data that are commonly used within the lodging industry to evaluate hotel financial and operating performance. Our management uses this information to measure the performance of hotel properties and/or our business as a whole. Historical information is periodically compared to our internal budgets, as well as against industry-wide information. We use this information for planning and monitoring our business, as well as in determining management and employee compensation.

Average daily rate (“ADR”) represents hotel room revenues divided by total number of rooms sold in a given period. ADR measures the average room price attained by a hotel or group of hotels, and ADR trends provide useful information concerning pricing policies and the nature of the guest base of a hotel or group of hotels. Changes in room rates have an impact on overall revenues and profitability.

Occupancy represents the total number of rooms sold in a given period divided by the total number of rooms available at a hotel or group of hotels. Occupancy measures the utilization of our hotels’ available capacity. Management uses occupancy to gauge demand at a specific hotel or group of hotels in a given period. Occupancy levels also help us determine achievable ADR levels as demand for hotel rooms increases or decreases.

Revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) is defined as the product of the ADR charged and the average daily occupancy achieved. RevPAR does not include other ancillary, non-room revenues, such as food and beverage revenues or parking, telephone or other guest service revenues generated by a hotel, which are not significant for the Company.

RevPAR changes that are driven predominately by occupancy have different implications for overall revenue levels and incremental hotel operating profit than changes driven predominately by ADR. For example, increases in occupancy at a hotel would lead to increases in room revenues, as well as incremental operating costs (including, but not limited to, housekeeping services, utilities and room amenity costs). RevPAR increases due to higher ADR, however, would generally not result in additional operating costs, with the exception of those charged or incurred as a percentage of revenue, such as credit card fees. As a result, changes in RevPAR driven by increases or decreases in ADR generally have a greater effect on operating profitability than changes in RevPAR driven by occupancy levels. Due to seasonality in our business, we review RevPAR by comparing current periods to budget and period-over-period.

RevPAR Index measures a hotel’s or group of hotels’ fair market share of a competitive set’s revenue per available room. RevPAR Index is stated as a percentage and is calculated for each hotel by comparing the hotel’s RevPAR to the aggregate RevPAR of a group of competing hotels generally in the same market. RevPAR Index is a weighted average of the individual property results. We subscribe to STR who collects and compiles the data used to calculate RevPAR Index, and STR may calculate ADR and RevPAR differently than we and our competitors do. The owner of each La Quinta hotel exercises its discretion in identifying the competitive set of properties for such hotel, considering, subject to STR’s guidelines, such factors as physical proximity, competition for similar customers, services and amenities, quality and average daily rate. We initially review the competitive set makeup of each new hotel that enters our system and review the continuing appropriateness of each hotel’s competitive set on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, while the hotel brands included in the competitive set for any individual La Quinta hotel depend heavily on market-specific conditions, the competitive sets for La Quinta hotels most often include one or more of Comfort, Holiday Inn Express and Hampton. Management uses RevPAR Index and changes in RevPAR Index, particularly year-over-year percentage changes, to evaluate the performance of individual or groups of hotels relative to other competing hotels.

 

76


Table of Contents

Comparable hotels are defined as hotels that: (i) were active and operating in our system for at least one full calendar year as of the end of the applicable period and were active and operating as of January 1st of the previous year; and (ii) have not sustained substantial property damage, business interruption or for which comparable results are not available. Management uses comparable hotels as the basis upon which to evaluate ADR, occupancy and RevPAR on a company-wide basis and for each of our reportable segments.

 

 

Of the 819 hotels in our system (excluding our assets held for sale) as of September 30, 2013, 772 have been classified as comparable hotels for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. No comparable hotels have been removed from the comparable group during the last 12 months for sustaining substantial property damage, business interruption, undergoing large-scale capital projects, or because comparable results are not available.

 

 

Of the 802, 783, and 775 hotels in our system (excluding our assets held for sale or otherwise sold) as of December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, 756, 719, and 670 have been classified as comparable hotels for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA.    Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) is a commonly used measure in many industries. We adjust EBITDA when evaluating our performance because we believe that the adjustment for certain items, such as restructuring and acquisition transaction expenses, impairment charges related to long-lived assets, non-cash equity-based compensation, discontinued operations, and other items not indicative of ongoing operating performance, provides useful supplemental information to management and investors regarding our ongoing operating performance. We believe that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide useful information to investors about us and our financial condition and results of operations for the following reasons: (i) EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are among the measures used by our management team to evaluate our operating performance and make day-to-day operating decisions; and (ii) EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are frequently used by securities analysts, investors, lenders and other interested parties as a common performance measure to compare results or estimate valuations across companies in our industry.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not recognized terms under GAAP, have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered either in isolation or as a substitute for net income (loss), cash flow or other methods of analyzing our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

 

 

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

 

 

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect our interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our indebtedness;

 

 

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect our tax expense or the cash requirements to pay our taxes;

 

 

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect historical cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

 

 

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the impact on earnings or changes resulting from matters that we consider not to be indicative of our future operations;

 

 

77


Table of Contents
 

Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and

 

 

Other companies in our industry may calculate EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA differently, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures.

Because of these limitations, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as discretionary cash available to us to reinvest in the growth of our business or as measures of cash that will be available to us to meet our obligations.

Results of operations

Our business has steadily improved in recent years following declines during the economic downturn, resulting in an increase in RevPAR on a year-over-year basis each year since 2010. We have experienced occupancy increases in our business and we have been able to increase ADR in our markets where demand has outpaced supply.

The following table presents hotel operating statistics for our system-wide (owned, franchised and managed) comparable hotels for the applicable periods(1):

 

      Nine months
ended
September 30,
2013
     Variance nine
months 2013
vs. nine
months 2012
     Year ended
December 31,
2012
     Variance
2012 vs.
2011
     Year ended
December 31,
2011
     Variance
2011 vs.
2010
 

 

 

Occupancy

     66.4%         145 bps         63.5%         191 bps         61.9%         261 bps   

ADR

   $ 79.71         4.4%       $ 75.66         4.6%       $ 72.14         2.6%   

RevPAR

   $ 52.90         6.8%       $ 48.05         7.8%       $ 44.67         7.2%   

 

 

 

(1)   See definition of comparable hotels in “—Key indicators of financial condition and operating performance—Comparable hotels.”

In addition, the following table presents RevPAR Index for our system-wide (owned, franchised and managed) hotels for the applicable periods:

 

      Nine months
ended
September 30,
2013
     Variance nine
months 2013
vs. nine
months 2012
     Year ended
December 31,
2012
     Variance
2012 vs.
2011
     Year ended
December 31,
2011
     Variance
2011 vs.
2010
 

 

 

RevPAR Index

     99.2%         206 bps         97.2%         123 bps         96.0%         143 bps   

 

 

We anticipate that if the overall economic recovery continues, we will continue to experience increases in demand for hotel accommodations. Because this continued increase in demand is not expected to be met with a corresponding significant increase in hotel room supply in the near term, particularly in the United States, we expect to see continued improvement in our operational and financial metrics. While we expect operating results at existing properties to improve and our business to continue to grow based on our business strengths and strategies that have and will continue to maximize our performance, our ability to do so is dependent in part on increases in discretionary spending and continued stabilization and recovery in the overall economic environment.

We also anticipate growth in our Franchise and Management segment, driven both by improvements in performance at our existing franchised hotels and by increases in the number of franchised hotels in our system based on our pipeline and plans to grow our franchise business. In

 

78


Table of Contents

recent years, we have made significant progress in executing our strategic priorities, including the expansion of our footprint through our franchise business. From January 2010 to September 30, 2013, our total number of owned, franchised and managed La Quinta hotels has grown from 733, or 74,983 rooms, to 819, or 82,177 rooms, with franchised hotels increased from 394 to 480. At December 31, 2010, our pipeline numbered 178 hotels, or 13,554 rooms, and has remained strong with 175 hotels, or 14,313 rooms, in our pipeline at September 30, 2013, while we have opened a net total of 44 hotels over that time period. Each of our pipeline hotels is represented by an executed franchise agreement, and 63 hotels in our pipeline were under construction as of September 30, 2013. However, should our franchisees experience difficulty in securing financing for their franchise or a decline in demand for hotel rooms, our pipeline may be adversely affected, resulting in delays in the opening of new hotels or decreases in the number of future properties that we could potentially franchise. Although there is no significant cost to us associated with our pipeline, because revenues from franchised hotels are principally derived from franchise fees rather than room rentals, to the extent our system grows through an increase in number of franchised hotels, revenues and expenses will increase at a significantly slower rate than the increase in number of hotels.

The completion of this offering will have effects on our results of operations and financial conditions. In the near term, we will incur a one-time tax cost of approximately $             million in connection with our restructuring transactions, which include the conversion of certain REITs and limited liability companies to “C” corporations. Following this offering, our results of operations will be affected by the recurring costs of being a public company, including increases in board and executive compensation, the costs of compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the costs of complying with the rules and regulations of the SEC and the stock exchange, and increased insurance, accounting, legal and investor relations costs. Additionally, as a result of our conversion to a “C” corporation, we will be taxed as a “C” corporation at the federal and state level. These costs are not reflected in our historical results.

Nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared with nine months ended September 30, 2012

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we experienced system-wide improvement at our comparable hotels in occupancy, ADR, and RevPAR, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Despite challenges in specific markets, we were able to increase ADR in markets where demand outpaced supply and successfully manage the usage of our best available rates (BAR), which represents our lowest available unqualified rate, resulting in a 4.4 percent increase in system-wide ADR in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012. System-wide occupancy increased 145 basis points in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The combination of improved occupancy and ADR drove a system-wide RevPAR increase of 6.8 percent in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

 

79


Table of Contents

The following tables present our overall operating performance, system-wide and segment occupancy, ADR and RevPAR rates on a comparable hotel statistic basis, in each case, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, including the amount and percentage change in these results between the periods:

 

      Nine months ended
September 30,
    Increase/(Decrease)  
(unaudited, in thousands)    2013     2012     $ change     % change  

 

 

Revenues

        

Room revenues

   $ 585,294      $ 552,459      $ 32,835        5.9%   

Franchise and other fee-based revenues

     59,846        52,054        7,792        15.0   

Other hotel revenues

     13,650        12,655        995        7.9   
  

 

 

 
     658,790        617,168        41,622        6.7   

Brand marketing fund revenues from franchised and managed properties

     14,594        13,139        1,455        11.1   
  

 

 

 

Total Revenues

     673,384        630,307        43,077        6.8   

Operating Expenses

        

Direct lodging expenses

     264,208        251,552        12,656        5.0   

Depreciation and amortization

     122,694        116,501        6,193        5.3   

General and administrative expenses

     49,724        50,575        (851     (1.7

Other lodging and operating expenses

     39,666        36,448        3,218        8.8   

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses

     54,226        44,475        9,751        21.9   
  

 

 

 
     530,518        499,551        30,967        6.2   

Brand marketing fund expenses from franchised and managed properties

     14,594        13,139        1,455        11.1   
  

 

 

 

Total Operating Expenses

     545,112        512,690        32,422        6.3   

Operating Income

     128,272        117,617        10,655        9.1   

 

 

Other Income (Expenses)

        

Interest expense, net

     (110,746     (66,892     (43,854     65.6   

Other income (loss)

     1,057        (7,374     8,431        NM (1) 

Gain on extinguishment of debt, net

            1,192        (1,192     NM (1) 
  

 

 

 

Total Other Income (Expenses)

     (109,689     (73,074     (36,615     NM (1) 
  

 

 

 

Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes

     18,583        44,543        (25,960     NM (1) 

Income tax expense

     (2,526     (1,906     (620     32.5   
  

 

 

 

Income from Continuing Operations, Net of Tax

     16,057        42,637        (26,580     NM (1) 

Gain (Loss) on Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax

     (6,303     (623     (5,680     NM (1) 

Net Income

     9,754        42,014        (32,260     NM (1) 

Net (Income) Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

     (1,106     4,233        (5,339     NM (1) 
  

 

 

   

Net Income Attributable to the Company

   $ 8,648      $ 46,247      $ (37,599     NM (1) 

 

 

 

(1)   Fluctuation in terms of percentage change is not meaningful.

 

80


Table of Contents
Comparable hotel statistics    Nine months
ended
September 30,
2013
     Variance
2013 vs.
2012
 

 

 

Owned Hotels

     

Occupancy

     65.7%         88 bps   

ADR

   $ 75.54         4.9%   

RevPAR

   $ 49.63         6.3%   

Franchised and Managed Hotels

     

Occupancy

     67.2%         216 bps   

ADR

   $ 84.76         3.9%   

RevPAR

   $ 56.96         7.3%   

System-wide

     

Occupancy

     66.4%         145 bps   

ADR

   $ 79.71         4.4%   

RevPAR

   $ 52.90         6.8%   

 

 

Revenues

Owned hotels

As of September 30, 2013, we had 339 owned hotels, comprising 43,205 rooms, located in the United States. Room revenues at our owned hotels for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 totaled $585.3 million and $552.5 million, respectively. The increase of $32.8 million, or 5.9 percent, was primarily driven by an increase in RevPAR at our comparable owned hotels of 6.3 percent, which was due to increases in ADR and occupancy of 4.9 percent and 88 basis points, respectively.

The increase in RevPAR was driven by a combination of factors, including the continuing economic recovery, an increased demand for hotel rooms due in part to the historically low level of new hotels being built in our competitive markets, enhanced pricing power in certain of our markets, the introduction of new distribution and selling channels and continuous enhancements to our brand experience through capital expenditures and staff training.

Other hotel revenues at our owned hotels for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 totaled $13.7 million and $12.7 million, respectively. The increase of $1.0 million, or 7.9 percent, was primarily a result of an increase in demand for ancillary hotel services, which was driven by increased occupancy.

Franchise and other fee-based revenues

As of September 30, 2013, we had 480 franchised hotels, comprising 38,972 rooms, located in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Franchise and other fee-based revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 totaled $59.8 million and $52.1 million, respectively. The increase of $7.8 million, or 15.0 percent, was primarily driven by an increase in RevPAR at our comparable franchised and managed hotels of 7.3 percent, which was due to increases in ADR and occupancy of 3.9 percent and 216 basis points, respectively. The increase in RevPAR was driven by a combination of factors, including the continuing economic recovery, an increased demand for hotel rooms due in part to the historically low level of new hotels being built in our franchised hotels’ competitive markets and enhanced pricing power in certain of our franchisees’ markets.

 

81


Table of Contents

The addition of new hotels to our franchise system also contributed to the growth in revenue. From September 30, 2012 to September 30, 2013, we added 27 franchised hotels on a net basis, providing an additional 2,407 rooms to our system.

Operating expenses

 

      Nine months
ended
September 30,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2013      2012      2013 vs. 2012  

 

 

Direct lodging expenses

   $ 264.2       $ 251.6         5.0   

Other lodging and operating expenses

     39.7         36.4         8.8   

 

 

Direct lodging expenses for our owned hotels totaled $264.2 million and $251.6 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The increase of $12.6 million, or 5.0 percent, was driven primarily by (1) an occupancy increase of 88 basis points; (2) increased usage and market driven price increases in certain of the commodities that impact our business, such as milk, orange juice, coffee and cotton; (3) increased travel agency commission costs due to the introduction of Expedia.com’s Expedia Traveler’s Preference, which allows the guest a choice to pay for a reservation at the time of booking, resulting in Expedia retaining its margin before paying us after the guest’s stay, or to pay us directly, resulting in the recognition of a commission after the guest departs based on actual consumed revenue. Many of our guests chose to pay us directly under this program, resulting in a new commission expense; and (4) the introduction of a significant new online travel agency, Booking.com, to our system. These expense increases were partially offset by the effects of continued cost mitigation strategies and the impact of operational efficiencies employed at our owned hotels. Other lodging and operating expenses for our owned hotels totaled $39.7 million and $36.4 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The increase of $3.2 million, or 8.8 percent, was primarily the result of increased cost for property insurance.

 

      Nine months ended
September 30,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)            2013              2012      2013 vs. 2012  

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

   $ 122.7       $ 116.5         5.3   

 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense for our owned hotels totaled $122.7 million and $116.5 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The increase of $6.2 million, or 5.3 percent, was the result of $118 million in capital expenditures between September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2013, which drove additional depreciation on certain owned assets in 2013.

 

      Nine months ended
September 30,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)            2013              2012      2013 vs. 2012  

 

 

General and administrative expenses

   $ 49.7       $ 50.6         (1.7

 

 

General and administrative expenses totaled $49.7 million and $50.6 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The decrease of $0.9 million, or 1.7 percent, was primarily the result of a decrease in compensation and related expenses driven by a one-time

 

82


Table of Contents

management bonus payment made in July 2012 in connection with the successful amendment and extension of our debt facilities (the “Secured Debt”) which occurred in May 2012 (the “Amendment”).

 

      Nine months ended
September 30,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)            2013              2012      2013 vs. 2012  

 

 

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses

   $ 54.2       $ 44.5         21.9   

 

 

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses, not funded by the BMF collected from our franchised and managed hotels, totaled $54.2 million and $44.5 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The increase of $9.8 million, or 21.9 percent, was primarily driven by increased spending to enhance brand awareness via broadcast, online, and print media outlets, increased administrative costs to support our growing brand programs and increased reimbursements to franchised and managed hotels for free night certificate redemptions. In addition, we spent $14.6 million of the BMF fees collected from franchised and managed hotels on similar brand management and other advertising expenses.

 

      Nine months ended
September 30,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)            2013              2012      2013 vs. 2012  

 

 

Interest expense, net

   $ 110.7       $ 66.9         65.6   

 

 

Net interest expense totaled $110.7 million and $66.9 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The increase of $43.9 million, or 65.6 percent, was primarily driven by the Amendment. The Amendment raised the weighted average effective interest rate on our Secured Debt from approximately 3.4 percent to approximately 5.3 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively. In addition, the higher effective interest rate was in place for the full nine months in 2013 as compared to approximately four months in 2012.

 

      Nine months ended
September 30,
    Percent
change
 
(in millions)            2013              2012     2013 vs. 2012  

 

 

Gain on extinguishment of debt, net

   $       $ 1.2        NM (1) 

Other income (loss)

   $ 1.1       $ (7.4     NM (1) 

 

 

 

(1)   Fluctuation in terms of percentage change is not meaningful.

In connection with the Amendment, we (1) settled a portion of our Secured Debt for $69.8 million, which resulted in a $5.2 million gain, and modified the terms of an additional portion of our Secured Debt, which resulted in a $4.0 million loss, the net impact of which was a gain on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $1.2 million, and (2) incurred $7.7 million of closing costs which were expensed as incurred and included in other income (loss).

 

      Nine months ended
September 30,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)            2013              2012      2013 vs. 2012  

 

 

Income tax expense

   $ 2.5       $ 1.9         32.5   

 

 

We have historically operated within legal structures that are disregarded for federal and most state income tax purposes. Accordingly, in those jurisdictions that recognize disregarded status,

 

83


Table of Contents

items of income and expense have been allocated to the owners of our legal entities. See “—Critical accounting policies and estimates—Income taxes.”

Our income tax expense totaled $2.5 million and $1.9 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and primarily consisted of the Texas margin tax, federal income taxes paid by certain taxable REIT subsidiaries and a provision for foreign income taxes. The increase of $0.6 million, or 32.5 percent, is primarily attributable to increased alternative minimum tax paid by a taxable REIT subsidiary and an increase in state income taxes due to increased taxable income, primarily in Texas, Colorado and California.

The effective income tax rate is determined by the level and composition of pre-tax income which is subject to federal, foreign, state, and local income taxes. Our effective tax rate was 14 percent and 4 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Segment results

We evaluate our segments’ operating performance using segment Adjusted EBITDA, as described in Note 10: “Segments” in the unaudited condensed combined financial statements of the Predecessor Entities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, included elsewhere in this prospectus. Refer to those financial statements for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income. For a discussion of our definitions of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, how management uses them to manage our business and material limitations on their usefulness, refer to “—Key indicators of financial condition and operating performance.” The following table sets forth revenues and Adjusted EBITDA by segment, reconciled to consolidated amounts, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

      Nine months ended
September 30,
    Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2013     2012     2013 vs. 2012  

 

 

Revenues

      

Owned Hotels

   $ 601,504      $ 567,987        5.9   

Franchise and Management

     42,232        37,870        11.5   

Segment revenues

     643,736        605,857        6.3   

Other revenues from franchised and managed properties

     14,594        13,139        11.1   

Corporate and other revenues(1)(2)

     74,424        66,101        12.6   

Intersegment elimination(3)

     (59,370     (54,790     8.4   

Total revenues

     673,384        630,307        6.8   

Adjusted EBITDA

      

Owned Hotels

     246,171        232,785        5.8   

Franchise and Management

     42,232        37,870        11.5   

Segment Adjusted EBITDA

     288,403        270,655        6.6   

Corporate and other

     (32,188     (30,637     5.1   

Adjusted EBITDA

     256,215        240,018        6.7   

 

 

 

(1)   Corporate and other includes revenues generated by and related to, and operating expenses incurred in connection with, the overall support and brand management of our owned, managed and franchised hotels and operations.

 

(2)   Includes revenues related to our brand management programs and other cost reimbursements. The portion of these fees that are charged to our owned hotels, which totaled $41.4 million and $38.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements.

 

(3)   Includes management, royalty, intellectual property royalty fees and other cost reimbursements totaling $59.4 million and $54.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which are eliminated in our combined financial statements.

 

84


Table of Contents

Owned hotels

Owned Hotels segment revenues increased primarily due to an improvement in RevPAR of 6.3 percent at our comparable owned hotels. Refer to “Revenues—Owned hotels” within this section for further discussion on the increase in revenues from our comparable owned hotels. Our Owned Hotels segment’s Adjusted EBITDA increased as a result of an increase in Owned Hotels segment revenues of approximately $33.5 million, partially offset by an increase in operating expenses of $20.1 million at our owned hotels. Refer to “Operating expenses—Owned hotels” within this section for further discussion on the increase in operating expenses at our owned hotels.

Franchise and management

Franchise and Management segment revenues increased primarily as a result of increases in RevPAR of 7.3 percent at our comparable franchised and owned hotels and the net addition of hotels added to our franchise system. Refer to “Revenues—Franchise and other fee-based revenues” within this section for further discussion on the increase in revenues from our comparable franchised hotels. Our Franchise and Management segment’s Adjusted EBITDA increased as a result of the increase in Franchise and Management segment revenues.

Year ended December 31, 2012 compared with year ended December 31, 2011

For 2012, the growth in hotel room demand continued from 2011 and 2010, as we experienced system-wide improvement at our comparable hotels in occupancy, ADR and RevPAR, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. Despite challenges in specific markets, we were able to increase ADR in markets where demand outpaced supply, successfully manage the usage of our best available rates (BAR), which represents our lowest available unqualified rate, and shift business to higher rated channels, resulting in a 4.6 percent increase in system-wide ADR in the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. System-wide occupancy increased 191 basis points in the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. The combination of improved occupancy and ADR drove a system-wide RevPAR increase of 7.8 percent in the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011.

The following tables present our overall operating performance, system-wide and segment occupancy, ADR and RevPAR rates, in each case, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, including the amount and percentage change in these results between the periods:

 

      Year ended
December 31,
     Increase/(Decrease)  
(in thousands)    2012      2011      $ change      % change  

 

 

Revenues

           

Room revenues

   $ 714,143       $ 660,816       $ 53,327         8.1%   

Franchise and other fee-based revenues

     69,206         59,314         9,892         16.7   

Other hotel revenues

     17,506         16,229         1,277         7.9   
  

 

 

 
     800,855         736,359         64,496         8.8   

Brand marketing fund revenues from franchised and managed properties

     17,157         15,182         1,975         13.0   
  

 

 

 

Total Revenues

     818,012         751,541         66,471         8.8   

 

 

 

85


Table of Contents
      Year ended
December 31,
    Increase/(Decrease)  
(in thousands)    2012     2011     $ change     % change  

Operating Expenses

        

Direct lodging expenses

     334,394        330,205        4,189        1.3   

Depreciation and amortization

     155,879        149,356        6,523        4.4   

General and administrative expenses

     74,111        61,578        12,533        20.4   

Other lodging and operating expenses

     58,266        47,791        10,475        21.9   

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses

     48,610        45,580        3,030        6.6   
  

 

 

 
     671,260        634,510        36,750        5.8   

Brand marketing fund expenses from franchised and managed properties

     17,157        15,182        1,975        13.0   
  

 

 

 

Total Operating Expenses

     688,417        649,692        38,725        6.0   

Operating Income

     129,595        101,849        27,746        27.2   
  

 

 

 

Other Income (Expenses)

        

Interest expense, net

     (103,124     (51,611     (51,513     99.8   

Impairment loss

                  

Other income (loss)

     (7,440     (662     (6,778     NM (1) 

Gain on extinguishment of debt, net

     1,192        11,451        (10,259     (89.6
  

 

 

 

Total Other Income (expenses)

     (109,372     (40,822     (68,550     NM (1) 
  

 

 

 

Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes

     20,223        61,027        (40,804     NM (1) 

Income tax expense

     (3,135     (2,332     (803     34.4   
  

 

 

 

Income from Continuing Operations, Net of Tax

     17,088        58,695        (41,607     NM (1) 

Gain (Loss) on Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax

     (52,852     244        (53,096     NM (1) 
  

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss)

     (35,764     58,939        (94,703     NM (1) 

Net Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

     4,810        4,574        236        5.2   
  

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to the Company

   $ (30,954   $ 63,513      $ (94,467     NM (1) 

 

 

 

(1)   Fluctuation in terms of percentage change is not meaningful.

 

Comparable hotel statistics    Year ended
December 31, 2012
     Variance
2012 vs. 2011
 

 

 

Owned Hotels

     

Occupancy

     63.0%         159 bps   

ADR

   $ 71.67         5.0%   

RevPAR

   $ 45.18         7.8%   

Franchised and Managed Hotels

     

Occupancy

     64.1%         232 bps   

ADR

   $ 80.72         4.0%   

RevPAR

   $ 51.77         7.9%   

System-wide

     

Occupancy

     63.5%         191 bps   

ADR

   $ 75.66         4.6%   

RevPAR

   $ 48.05         7.8%   

 

 

 

86


Table of Contents

Revenues

Owned hotels

As of December 31, 2012, we had 339 owned hotels, comprising 43,197 rooms located in the United States. Room revenues at our owned hotels for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 totaled $714.1 million and $660.8 million, respectively. The increase of $53.3 million, or 8.1 percent, was primarily driven by an increase in RevPAR at our comparable owned hotels of 7.8 percent, which was due to increases in ADR and occupancy of 5.0 percent and 159 basis points, respectively.

The increase in RevPAR was driven by a combination of factors, including the continuing economic recovery, an increased demand for hotel rooms due in part to the historically low level of new hotels being built in our competitive markets, enhanced pricing power in certain of our markets, the introduction of new distribution and selling channels, and continuous enhancements to our brand experience through capital expenditures and staff training.

Other hotel revenues at our owned hotels for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 totaled $17.5 million and $16.2 million, respectively. The increase of $1.3 million, or 7.9 percent, was primarily a result of an increase in demand for ancillary hotel services, which was driven by increased occupancy.

Franchise and other fee-based revenues

As of December 31, 2012, we had 463 franchised hotels, comprising 37,484 rooms, located in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Franchise and other fee-based revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 totaled $69.2 million and $59.3 million, respectively. The increase of $9.9 million, or 16.7 percent, was primarily driven by an increase in RevPAR at our comparable franchised and managed hotels of 7.9 percent, which was due to increases in ADR and occupancy of 4.0 percent and 232 basis point, respectively. The increase in RevPAR was driven by a combination of factors, including the continuing economic recovery, an increased demand for hotel rooms due in part to the historically low level of new hotels being built in our franchised hotels’ competitive markets and enhanced pricing power in certain of our franchisees’ markets.

The addition of new hotels to our franchise system also contributed to the growth in revenue. From December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012, we added 19 franchised hotels on a net basis, providing an additional 1,653 rooms to our system.

Operating expenses

 

      Year ended
December 31,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2012      2011      2012 vs. 2011  

 

 

Direct lodging expenses

   $ 334.4       $ 330.2         1.3   

Other lodging and operating expenses

   $ 58.3       $ 47.8         21.9   

 

 

Direct lodging expenses for our owned hotels totaled $334.4 million and $330.2 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The increase of $4.2 million, or 1.3 percent, was primarily due to increased occupancy of 159 basis points, market driven increases in commodity pricing, local market advertising costs and travel agency commissions. These expense increases were partially offset by the effects of continued cost mitigation strategies and the impact of operational efficiencies employed at our owned hotels.

 

87


Table of Contents

Other lodging and operating expenses for our owned hotels totaled $58.3 million and $47.8 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The increase of $10.5 million, or 21.9 percent, was primarily the result of increased cost for property insurance and assessed property taxes, as well as an increase in net property casualty losses.

 

      Year ended
December 31,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2012      2011      2012 vs. 2011  

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

   $ 155.9       $ 149.4         4.4   

 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense for our owned hotels totaled $155.9 million and $149.4 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The increase of $6.5 million, or 4.4 percent, was the result of $103 million in capital expenditures occurring in 2012, which drove additional depreciation on certain owned assets during the year.

 

      Year ended
December 31,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2012      2011      2012 vs. 2011  

 

 

General and administrative expenses

   $ 74.1       $ 61.6         20.4   

 

 

General and administrative expenses totaled $74.1 million and $61.6 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The increase of $12.5 million, or 20.4 percent, was primarily driven by a one-time management bonus payment tied to the successful amendment and extension of our long-term debt obligations, shifting of certain support staff from direct hotel operations to general and administrative functions, as well as an increase in our operational staff to support the growth of the overall business.

 

      Year ended
December 31,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2012      2011      2012 vs. 2011  

 

 

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses

   $ 48.6       $ 45.6         6.6   

 

 

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses, not funded by the BMF collected from our franchised and managed hotels, totaled $48.6 million and $45.6 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The increase of $3.0 million, or 6.6 percent, was primarily driven by increased spending to enhance brand awareness via broadcast, online and print media outlets, increased reimbursements to franchised and managed hotels for free night certificate redemptions and increased use of advertising agencies. In addition, we spent $17.2 million of the BMF from franchised and managed hotels on similar brand management and other advertising expenses.

 

      Year ended
December 31,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2012      2011      2012 vs. 2011  

 

 

Interest expense, net

   $ 103.1       $ 51.6         99.8   

 

 

Net interest expense totaled $103.1 million and $51.6 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The increase of $51.5 million, or 99.8 percent, was primarily driven by the Amendment, which was finalized in May of 2012. The Amendment raised the weighted average effective interest rate on our Secured Debt from approximately 1.6 percent to 3.5 percent for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

 

88


Table of Contents
      Year ended
December 31,
    Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2012     2011     2012 vs. 2011  

 

 

Gain on extinguishment of debt, net

   $ 1.2      $ 11.5        (89.6

Other income (loss)

   $ (7.4   $ (0.7     NM (1) 

 

 

 

(1)   Fluctuation in terms of percentage change is not meaningful.

In connection with the Amendment, we (1) settled a portion of our Secured Debt for $69.8 million, which resulted in a $5.2 million gain, and modified the terms of an additional portion of our Secured Debt, which resulted in a $4.0 million loss, the net impact of which was a gain on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $1.2 million, and (2) incurred $7.7 million of closing costs which were expensed as incurred and included in other income (loss). In 2011, we settled a portion of our Secured Debt, resulting in a gain on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $11.5 million.

 

      Year ended
December 31,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2012      2011      2012 vs. 2011  

 

 

Income tax expense

   $ 3.1       $ 2.3         34.4   

 

 

We have historically operated within legal structures that are disregarded for federal and most state income tax purposes. Accordingly, in those jurisdictions that recognize disregarded status, items of income and expense have been allocated to the owners of our legal entities. See “—Critical accounting policies and estimates—Income taxes.”

Our income tax expense totaled $3.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and primarily consisted of the Texas margin tax, federal income taxes paid by certain taxable REIT subsidiaries and a provision for foreign income taxes. The increase of $0.8 million, or 34.4 percent, is primarily attributable to increased alternative minimum tax paid by a taxable REIT subsidiary, and an increased provision for foreign income taxes related to our growing operations outside the United States.

The effective income tax rate is determined by the level and composition of pre-tax income which is subject to federal, foreign, state, and local income taxes. Our effective tax rate was 16 percent and 4 percent for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Discontinued operations

 

      Year ended
December 31,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2012     2011      2012 vs. 2011  

 

 

Gain (Loss) on discontinued operations

   $ (52.9   $ 0.2         NM (1) 

 

 

 

(1)   Fluctuation in terms of percentage change is not meaningful.

Gain (Loss) on discontinued operations totaled $(52.9) million and $0.2 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. During 2012, we began an exercise to identify hotel assets in our portfolio which, for a variety of reasons, we determined detracted from our brand. As a result of a tentative disposal list of hotels being identified, and the resulting decrease in the assumed holding period for these assets, an impairment charge of $51.5 million was recognized as part of our annual testing for impairment of long-lived assets. However, the assets did not meet all of the criteria for classification as assets held for sale as of December 31, 2012.

 

89


Table of Contents

During the second quarter of 2013, the disposal list was finalized, causing 44 of our hotels, including all 11 of our Baymont-branded hotels, to meet all of the criteria to be classified as assets held for sale. As such, these hotels were classified as assets held for sale, and the results of their operations have accordingly been presented within discontinued operations for all periods presented herein. For the year ended December 31, 2011, no impairment was recorded. See Note 6: “Discontinued Operations” in the audited condensed combined financial statements of the Predecessor Entities included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Segment results

We evaluate our segments’ operating performance using segment Adjusted EBITDA, as described in Note 16: “Segments” in the audited condensed combined financial statements of the Predecessor Entities included elsewhere in this prospectus. Refer to those financial statements for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income. For a discussion of our definitions of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, how management uses them to manage our business and material limitations on their usefulness, refer to “—Key indicators of financial condition and operating performance.” The following table sets forth revenues and Adjusted EBITDA by segment, reconciled to consolidated amounts, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

 

      Year ended
December 31,
    Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2012     2011     2012 vs. 2011  

 

 

Revenues

      

Owned Hotels

   $ 734,547      $ 679,843        8.0   

Franchise and Management

     50,086        44,064        13.7   

Segment revenues

     784,633        723,907        8.4   

Other revenues from franchised and managed properties

     17,157        15,182        13.0   

Corporate and other revenues(1)(2)

     88,870        76,178        16.7   

Intersegment elimination(3)

     (72,648     (63,726     14.0   

Total revenues

     818,012        751,541        8.8   

Adjusted EBITDA

      

Owned Hotels

     285,974        250,701        14.1   

Franchise and Management

     50,086        44,064        13.7   

Segment Adjusted EBITDA

     336,060        294,765        14.0   

Corporate and other

     (38,237     (36,376     5.1   

Adjusted EBITDA

     297,823        258,389        15.3   

 

 

 

(1)   Corporate and other includes revenues generated by and related to and operating expenses incurred in connection with the overall support and brand management of our owned, managed, and franchised hotels and operations.

 

(2)   Includes revenues related to cost reimbursements and brand management fees. The portion of these fees that are charged to our owned hotels are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements.

 

(3)   Includes management, royalty, intellectual property royalty fees and other cost reimbursements totaling $72.6 million and $63.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, which are eliminated in our combined financial statements.

Owned hotels

Owned Hotels segment revenues increased primarily due to an improvement in RevPAR of 7.8 percent at our comparable owned hotels. Refer to “Revenues—Owned hotels” within this section for further discussion on the increase in revenues from our comparable owned hotels.

 

90


Table of Contents

Our Owned Hotels segment’s Adjusted EBITDA increased as a result of an increase in Owned Hotels segment revenues of approximately $54.7 million, partially offset by an increase in operating expenses of approximately $19.4 million at our owned hotels. Refer to “Operating expenses—Owned hotels” within this section for further discussion on the increase in operating expenses at our owned hotels.

Franchise and management

Franchise and Management segment revenues increased primarily as a result of increases in RevPAR of 7.9 percent at our comparable franchised and owned hotels and the net addition of hotels added to our franchise system. Refer to “Revenues—Franchise and other fee-based revenues” within this section for further discussion on the increase in revenues from our comparable franchised hotels. Our Franchise and Management segment’s Adjusted EBITDA increased as a result of the increase in Franchise and Management segment revenues.

Year ended December 31, 2011 compared with year ended December 31, 2010

For 2011, the growth in hotel room demand continued as we experienced system-wide improvement at our comparable hotels in occupancy, ADR, and RevPAR, compared to the year ended December 31, 2010. We were able to increase ADR in markets where demand outpaced supply, successfully manage the usage of our best available rates (BAR), which represents our lowest available unqualified rate, and shift business to higher rate channels, resulting in a 2.6 percent increase in system-wide ADR in the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to the year ended December 31, 2010. System-wide occupancy increased 261 basis points in the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to the year ended December 31, 2010. The combination of improved occupancy and ADR drove a system-wide RevPAR increase of 7.2 percent in the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

91


Table of Contents

The following tables present our overall operating performance, our system-wide and segment occupancy, ADR and RevPAR rates, in each case, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, including the amount and percentage change in these results between the periods:

 

      Year ended
December 31,
    Increase/(Decrease)  
(in thousands)    2011     2010     $ change     % change  

 

 

Revenues

        

Room revenues

   $ 660,816      $ 623,720      $ 37,096        5.9   

Franchise and other fee-based revenues

     59,314        52,074        7,240        13.9   

Other hotel revenues

     16,229        16,821        (592     (3.5
  

 

 

 
     736,359        692,615        43,744        6.3   

Brand marketing fund revenues from franchised and managed properties

     15,182        13,238        1,944        14.7   
  

 

 

 

Total Revenues

     751,541        705,853        45,688        6.5   

Operating Expenses

        

Direct lodging expenses

     330,205        305,856        24,349        8.0   

Depreciation and amortization

     149,356        141,708        7,648        5.4   

General and administrative expenses

     61,578        63,828        (2,250     (3.5

Other lodging and operating expenses

     47,791        49,623        (1,832     (3.7

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses

     45,580        42,516        3,064        7.2   
  

 

 

 
     634,510        603,531        30,979        5.1   

Brand marketing fund expenses from franchised and managed properties

     15,182        13,238        1,944        14.7   
  

 

 

 

Total Operating Expenses

     649,692        616,769        32,923        5.3   

Operating Income

     101,849        89,084        12,765        14.3   

Other Income (Expenses)

        

Interest expense, net

     (51,611     (50,469     (1,142     2.3   

Other income (loss)

     (662     1,483        (2,145     NM (1) 

Gain on extinguishment of debt, net

     11,451        40,494        (29,043     (71.7
  

 

 

 

Total Other Income (Expenses)

     (40,822     (8,492     (32,330     NM (1) 
  

 

 

 

Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes

     61,027        80,592        (19,565     NM (1) 

Income tax expense

     (2,332     (2,459     127        (5.2
  

 

 

 

Income from Continuing Operations, Net of Tax

     58,695        78,133        (19,438     NM (1) 

Gain (Loss) on Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax

     244        (12,150     12,394        NM (1) 
  

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss)

     58,939        65,983        (7,044     NM (1) 

Net Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

     4,574        2,845        1,729        NM (1) 
  

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to the Company

   $ 63,513      $ 68,828      $ (5,315     NM (1) 

 

 

 

(1)   Fluctuation in terms of percentage change is not meaningful.

 

92


Table of Contents
Comparable hotel statistics    Year ended
December 31, 2011
     Variance
2011 vs. 2010
 

 

 

Owned Hotels

     

Occupancy

     61.4%         150 bps   

ADR

   $ 68.23         3.4%   

RevPAR

   $ 41.92         5.9%   

Franchised and Managed Hotels

     

Occupancy

     62.6%         419 bps   

ADR

   $ 77.57         1.4%   

RevPAR

   $ 48.57         8.7%   

System-wide

     

Occupancy

     61.9%         261 bps   

ADR

   $ 72.14         2.6%   

RevPAR

   $ 44.67         7.2%   

 

 

Revenues

Owned hotels

As of December 31, 2011, we had 339 owned hotels, comprising 43,184 rooms located in the United States. Room revenues at our owned hotels for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 totaled $660.8 million and $623.7 million, respectively. The increase of $37.1 million, or 5.9 percent, was primarily driven by an increase in RevPAR at our comparable owned hotels of 5.9 percent, which was due to increases in ADR and occupancy of 3.4 percent and 150 basis points, respectively.

The increase in RevPAR was driven by a combination of factors, including the recovery from the economic downturn, an increased demand for hotel rooms due in part to the historically low level of new hotels being built in our competitive markets, enhanced pricing power in certain of our markets, and continuous enhancements to our brand experience through capital expenditures and staff training.

Other hotel revenues at our owned hotels for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 totaled $16.2 million and $16.8 million, respectively. The decrease of $0.6 million, or 3.5 percent, was primarily a result of a decline in pay-per-view movie commissions related to a change to a lower-cost service provider, and the installation of new, high definition televisions, allowing for plug-n-play entertainment options.

Franchise and other fee-based revenues

As of December 31, 2011, we had 444 franchised hotels, comprising 35,831 rooms, located in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Franchise and other fee-based revenues for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 totaled $59.3 million and $52.1 million, respectively. The increase of $7.2 million, or 13.9 percent, was primarily driven by an increase in RevPAR at our comparable franchised and managed hotels of 8.7 percent, which was due to increases in ADR and occupancy of 1.4 percent and 419 basis points, respectively. The increase in RevPAR was driven by a combination of factors, including the recovery from the economic downturn, an increased demand for hotel rooms due in part to the historically low level of new hotels being built in our franchised hotels’ competitive markets and enhanced pricing power in certain of our franchisees’ markets.

 

93


Table of Contents

The addition of new hotels to our franchise system also contributed to the growth in revenue. From December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2011, we added 8 franchised hotels on a net basis, providing an additional 664 rooms to our system.

Operating expenses

 

      Year ended
December 31,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2011      2010      2011 vs. 2010  

 

 

Direct lodging expenses

   $ 330.2       $ 305.9         8.0   

Other lodging and operating expenses

   $ 47.8       $ 49.6         (3.7

 

 

Direct lodging expenses for our owned hotels totaled $330.2 million and $305.9 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The increase of $24.3 million, or 8.0 percent, was partially due to increased occupancy of 150 basis points at our owned hotels, market driven increases in commodity pricing, as well as increases in our utilities costs, bad debt expense, vehicle maintenance costs and travel agency commissions, the latter being reflective of our increased revenues. These expense increases were partially offset by the effects of cost mitigation strategies and the impact of operational efficiencies employed at our owned hotels.

Other lodging and operating expenses for our owned hotels totaled $47.8 million and $49.6 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The decrease of $1.8 million, or 3.7 percent, was primarily the result of a decrease in net property casualty losses, received in 2010 offset by casualty insurance expenses in 2011.

 

      Year ended
December 31,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2011      2010      2011 vs. 2010  

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

   $ 149.4       $ 141.7         5.4   

 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense for our owned hotels totaled $149.4 million and $141.7 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The increase of $7.7 million, or 5.4 percent, was primarily due to $96 million in capital expenditures occurring in 2011, which drove additional depreciation on certain owned assets during the year.

 

      Year ended
December 31,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2011      2010      2011 vs. 2010  

 

 

General and administrative expenses

   $ 61.6       $ 63.8         (3.5

 

 

General and administrative expenses totaled $61.6 million and $63.8 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The decrease of $2.2 million, or 3.5 percent, was primarily driven by a decrease in legal reserves offset by increases in corporate liability insurance costs and compensation and related expenses.

 

      Year ended
December 31,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2011      2010      2011 vs. 2010  

 

 

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses

   $ 45.6       $ 42.5         7.2   

 

 

 

94


Table of Contents

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses, not funded by the BMF collected from our franchised and managed hotels, totaled $45.6 million and $42.5 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The increase of $3.1 million, or 7.2 percent, was primarily driven by increased spending to enhance brand awareness via broadcast, online, and print media outlets, increased administrative costs to support our growing brand programs, and increased reimbursements to franchised and managed hotels for free night certificate redemptions. In addition, we spent $15.2 million of the BMF from franchised and managed hotels on similar brand management and other advertising expenses.

 

      Year ended
December 31,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2011      2010      2011 vs. 2010  

 

 

Interest expense, net

   $ 51.6       $ 50.5         2.3   

 

 

Net interest expense totaled $51.6 million and $50.5 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The increase of $1.1 million, or 2.3 percent, was primarily driven by an increase in our weighted average effective interest rate on our outstanding debt from approximately 1.5 percent to 1.6 percent for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, respectively.

 

      Year ended
December 31,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2011     2010      2011 vs. 2010  

 

 

Gain on extinguishment of debt, net

   $ 11.5      $ 40.5         (71.7

Other income (loss)

   $ (0.7   $ 1.5         NM (1) 

 

 

 

(1)   Fluctuation in terms of percentage change is not meaningful.

In 2011 and 2010, we settled portions of our Secured Debt, resulting in gains on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $11.5 million and $40.5 million, respectively.

 

      Year ended
December 31,
     Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2011      2010      2011 vs. 2010  

 

 

Income tax expense

   $ 2.3       $ 2.5         (5.2

 

 

We have historically operated within legal structures that are disregarded for federal and most state income tax purposes. Accordingly, in those jurisdictions that recognize disregarded status, items of income and expense have been allocated to the owners of our legal entities. See “—Results of operations—Critical accounting policies and estimates—Income taxes.”

Our income tax expense totaled $2.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 and primarily consisted of the Texas margin tax, federal income taxes paid by certain taxable REIT subsidiaries and a provision for foreign income taxes. The decrease of $0.1 million, or 5.2 percent, is primarily attributable to a decrease in state and local income taxes, which was partially offset by an increase in federal income taxes.

The effective income tax rate is determined by the level and composition of pre-tax income which is subject to federal, foreign, state, and local income taxes. Our effective tax rate was 4 percent and 3 percent for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

95


Table of Contents

Discontinued operations

 

      Year ended
December 31,
    Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2011      2010     2011 vs. 2010  

 

 

Gain (Loss) on discontinued operations

   $ 0.2       $ (12.2     NM (1) 

 

 

 

(1)   Fluctuation in terms of percentage change is not meaningful.

Gain (Loss) on discontinued operations totaled $0.2 million and $(12.2) million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. In connection with our annual long-lived asset impairment test, in 2010 we determined that property and equipment related to certain of our owned hotels were partially impaired primarily due to changes in market conditions and, as a result, we recorded an impairment loss of approximately $11.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. For the year ended December 31, 2011, no impairment was recorded. See Note 6: “Discontinued Operations” in the audited condensed combined financial statements of the Predecessor Entities included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Segment results

We evaluate our segments’ operating performance using segment Adjusted EBITDA, as described in Note 16: “Segments” in the audited condensed combined financial statements of the Predecessor Entities included elsewhere in this prospectus. Refer to those financial statements for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income. For a discussion of our definitions of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, how management uses them to manage our business and material limitations on their usefulness, refer to “—Key indicators of financial condition and operating performance.” The following table sets forth revenues and Adjusted EBITDA by segment, reconciled to consolidated amounts, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:

 

      Year ended
December 31,
    Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2011     2010     2011 vs. 2010  

 

 

Revenues

      

Owned Hotels

   $ 679,843      $ 642,990        5.7   

Franchise and Management

     44,064        40,303        9.3   

Segment revenues

     723,907        683,293        5.9   

Other revenues from franchised and managed properties

     15,182        13,238        14.7   

Corporate and other revenues(1)(2)

     76,178        67,661        12.6   

Intersegment elimination(3)

     (63,726     (58,339     9.2   

Total revenues

     751,541        705,853        6.5   

Adjusted EBITDA

      

Owned Hotels

     250,701        232,058        8.0   

Franchise and Management

     44,064        40,303        9.3   

Segment Adjusted EBITDA

     294,765        272,361        8.2   

Corporate and other

     (36,376     (42,395     (14.2

Adjusted EBITDA

     258,389        229,966        12.4   

 

 

 

(1)   Corporate and other includes revenues generated by and related to and operating expenses incurred in connection with the overall support and brand management of our owned, managed, and franchised hotels and operations.

 

(2)   Includes revenues related to cost reimbursements and brand management fees. The portion of these fees that are charged to our owned hotels are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements.

 

96


Table of Contents
(3)   Includes management, royalty, intellectual property royalty fees and other cost reimbursements totaling $63.7 million and $56.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which are eliminated in our combined financial statements.

Owned hotels

Owned Hotels segment revenues increased primarily due to an improvement in RevPAR of 5.9 percent at our comparable owned hotels. Refer to “Revenues—Owned hotels” within this section for further discussion on the increase in revenues from our comparable owned hotels. Our Owned Hotels segment’s Adjusted EBITDA increased primarily as a result of an increase in Owned Hotels segment revenues of approximately $36.9 million, partially offset by an increase in operating expenses of approximately $18.2 million at our owned hotels. Refer to “Operating expenses—Owned hotels” within this section for further discussion on the increase in operating expenses at our owned hotels.

Franchise and management

Franchise and Management segment revenues increased primarily as a result of increases in RevPAR of 8.7 percent at our comparable franchised and owned hotels and the net addition of hotels added to our franchise system. Refer to “Revenues—Franchise and other fee-based revenues” within this section for further discussion on the increase in revenues from our comparable franchised hotels. Our Franchise and Management segment’s Adjusted EBITDA increased as a result of the increase in Franchise and Management segment revenues.

Liquidity and capital resources

Overview

As of September 30, 2013, we had total cash and cash equivalents of $185.6 million, including both restricted (current and non-current) and unrestricted cash balances. Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents totaled $49.0 million as of September 30, 2013. Our restricted cash and cash equivalents totaled $136.6 million as of September 30, 2013 ($128.0 million included in current assets and $8.6 million included in non-current assets). The majority of our restricted cash and cash equivalents balances relates to prefunded cash reserves and cash collateral on our self-insurance programs. The prefunded cash reserves are required under the terms of the agreements related to our mortgage loans. They may be used to pay debt service and other amounts due under the mortgage loans and for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures, but are classified in our consolidated balance sheets as restricted cash and cash equivalents in accordance with GAAP because they generally require lender consent to be used.

Our known liquidity requirements primarily consist of funds necessary to pay for operating expenses and other expenditures, including corporate expenses, payroll and related benefits, legal costs, operating costs associated with the operation of hotels, interest and scheduled principal payments on our outstanding indebtedness, and capital expenditures for renovations and maintenance at our owned hotels and funds necessary to pay for scheduled debt maturities, capital improvements at our owned hotels and purchase commitments. Specifically, all of our Secured Debt currently matures in July 2014. We intend to refinance such debt facilities prior to or concurrently with the consummation of this offering, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so on favorable terms or at all. See “—Debt” for a further discussion of our Secured Debt.

We finance our business activities primarily with existing cash and cash generated from our operations. We believe that this cash will be adequate to meet anticipated requirements for

 

97


Table of Contents

operating expenses and other expenditures, including corporate expenses, payroll and related benefits, legal costs, and purchase commitments for the foreseeable future. The objectives of our cash management policy are to maintain the availability of liquidity and minimize operational costs.

The following table summarizes our net cash flows and key metrics related to our liquidity:

 

      As of and for
the nine
months ended
September 30,
    Percent
change
 
(in millions)    2013     2012     2013 vs. 2012  

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   $ 193      $ 211        (8.4

Net cash used in investing activities

     (39     (133     (70.8

Net cash used in financing activities

     (146     (129     13.3   

Working capital surplus (deficit)(1)

     139        85        63.5   

 

 

 

(1)   Total current assets less total current liabilities, excluding the current portion of long-term debt.

 

      As of and for the year
ended December 31,
    Percent change  
(in millions)    2012     2011     2010     2012 vs. 2011     2011 vs. 2010  

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   $ 248      $ 220      $ 201        12.6        9.8   

Net cash used in investing activities

     (151     (92     (83     63.3        11.8   

Net cash used in financing activities

     (147     (78     (118     88.2        (33.7

Working capital surplus (deficit)(1)

     64        66        23        (2.7     185.4   

 

 

 

(1)   Total current assets less total current liabilities, excluding the current portion of long-term debt.

Our ratio of current assets to current liabilities, excluding the current portion of long-term debt, was 1.96, 1.47 and 1.52 as of September 30, 2013, December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Operating activities

Cash flow from operating activities is primarily generated from operating income from our owned hotels and our franchising business.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $193 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to $211 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The $18 million decrease was primarily due to a net decrease in cash due to changes in various working capital components of approximately $11 million, and an increase in cash paid for interest of approximately $26 million driven by the increase in effective interest rate as a result of the amendment of our long-term debt, partially offset by an increase in operating income of approximately $11 million.

The net $28 million increase in cash provided by operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011, was primarily due to an increase in operating income of $28 million, a net increase in cash due to changes in various working capital components of approximately $13 million, partially offset by an increase in losses from hotel property casualty occurrences of approximately $8 million and an increase in cash paid for interest of approximately $22 million.

The net $19 million increase in cash provided by operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, was primarily due to an

 

98


Table of Contents

increase in operating income of $13 million and an increase in gains from casualty occurrences of approximately $2 million, partially offset by a decrease in cash paid for interest of approximately $2 million.

Investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $39 million, compared to $133 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The $94 million decrease in cash used in investing activities was primarily attributable to the receipt of approximately $65 million in net proceeds from the sale of certain hotels in the third quarter of 2013, a decrease in amounts funded to restricted cash accounts created in connection with the Amendment in the amount of approximately $44 million, partially offset by a $15 million increase in capital expenditures.

The $59 million increase in net cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011, was primarily attributable to an increase in restricted cash of $53 million and an increase in capital expenditures of $7 million. The majority of the increase in capital expenditures related to improvements at existing owned hotels. The increase in restricted cash was a result of new requirements associated with the Amendment.

The $9 million increase in net cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, was primarily due to an increase in capital expenditures of $26 million, partially offset by a decrease in restricted cash of $0.5 million.

Financing activities

Net cash used in financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $146 million, compared to $129 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The $17 million increase in cash used in financing activities was primarily attributable to increased debt repayments made in connection with the sale of certain hotel assets in the third quarter of 2013, together with payment of associated closing costs.

Net cash used in financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2012 increased $69 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily due to activity related to the Amendment, which resulted in increased net principal payments totaling approximately $130 million and increased payments for financing costs of approximately $10 million, partially offset by increased net contributions from our existing owners of approximately $72 million.

Net cash used in financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2011 decreased $40 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to an increase in net contributions from our existing owners of approximately $147 million, partially offset by an increase in our net principal payments on our mortgage loans totaling approximately $105 million.

Capital expenditures

We divide our capital expenditures primarily between “repositioning” and “recurring” capital. Repositioning capital includes projects designed to increase our market share through enhancements to our hotel rooms, hotel common areas and hotel exteriors and conversions of pre-existing non-La Quinta hotels to La Quinta brand standards. In addition, our historic repositioning capital also includes funds spent to develop our flagship hotel property in downtown Chicago and

 

99


Table of Contents

capital projects to upgrade our technology infrastructure. Repositioning capital includes acceleration of some aspects of normal cycle renovations. Recurring capital expenditures are comprised of repair and maintenance in ordinary course operations, cycle renovations and ongoing maintenance of our technology infrastructure in order to keep it current.

The cost of all improvements and renovations to our owned hotels are generally made with cash on hand and cash flows from operations.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012, we incurred capital expenditures of approximately $83.0 million and $102.9 million, respectively. Of these amounts, approximately 8% and 24%, respectively, represented repositioning capital and 92% and 76%, respectively, represented recurring capital.

We currently consider a spending level of approximately         % of our total revenues on an annual basis for capital expenditures to be required in order to repair, maintain and complete necessary cycle renovations and fund other capital projects.

As of September 30, 2013, we had outstanding commitments under capital expenditure contracts of approximately $38.3 million for capital expenditures at certain owned hotels and for information technology enhancements. If cancellation of a contract occurred, our commitment would be any costs incurred up to the cancellation date, in addition to any costs associated with the discharge of the contract.

Debt

As of September 30, 2013, our total indebtedness was approximately $2.8 billion. For further information on our total indebtedness, refer to Note 8: “Long-Term Debt” in the audited combined financial statements and Note 5: “Long-Term Debt” in the unaudited combined financial statements, in each case, of the Predecessor Entities and included elsewhere in this prospectus. As of September 30, 2013, key terms and balances related to our indebtedness were as follows:

 

(in thousands)    Interest rate   

Maturity

date

 

September 30,

2013

    

December 31,

2012

 

 

 

Current:

          

Holdco I Mortgage Loan

   LIBOR + 2.790%(1)                      (2)   $ 2,023,548       $ 56,250   

Holdco III Mortgage Loan

   (3)                      (4)     219,409         5,042   

Mezzanine Loans

   LIBOR + 9.0% to 13.9%(5)                      (6)     556,786           
       

 

 

 

Current portion of long-term debt

        $ 2,799,743       $ 61,292   
       

 

 

 

Long-term:

          

Holdco I Mortgage Loan

   LIBOR + 2.790%(1)                      (6)             2,092,864   

Holdco III Mortgage Loan

   (3)                      (7)             228,547   

Mezzanine Loans

   LIBOR + 9.0% to 13.9%(5)                      (6)             517,262   
       

 

 

 

Long-term debt

        $       $ 2,838,673   

 

 

 

(1)  

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the 30 day United States dollar London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) was 0.18% and 0.21%, respectively. Portions of the Holdco I Mortgage Loan, with principal totaling $1.12 billion, carry interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 0.55%. The remaining Holdco I Mortgage Loan balances, with principal totaling

 

100


Table of Contents
 

approximately $0.9 billion, are subject to a LIBOR floor of 1.0% plus spreads ranging from 3.891% to 6.803%. The total weighted average spread for the Holdco I Mortgage Loan was 2.790% as of September 30, 2013 and 2.664% as of December 31, 2012.

 

(2)   The modified terms of the Holdco I Mortgage Loan require us to make certain principal payments upon closing and quarterly beginning on the first scheduled loan payment date following September 30, 2012. Final maturity is July 2014.

 

(3)   The interest rate for the Holdco III Mortgage loan for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was LIBOR with a floor of 1.0% plus a spread of 4.5%.

 

(4)   Principal payments are required quarterly equal to the amount of excess cash flows, as defined, held in escrowed accounts over a specified floor.

 

(5)   The Holdco I Mezzanine Loans bear interest at LIBOR plus current payment spreads ranging from 1.0% to 2.15%, and deferred payment spreads ranging from 8.0% to 11.75%, payable at maturity. Any difference between current LIBOR and the LIBOR floor of 1% is deferred to maturity. The total weighted average spread for the Holdco I Mezzanine Loans was 11.590% as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

 

(6)   In accordance with the Amendment, the maturity date was extended to July 2014. No scheduled principal payments are required prior to the maturity date.

 

(7)   The original maturity date was July 2013; however, we exercised the remaining one-year extension option that permitted us, at our discretion, to extend the Holdco III Mortgage Loan’s maturity date to July 2014. Included in the Holdco III Mortgage Loan as of September 30, 2013 is an unamortized long-term debt reduction of $3,446, which is being amortized using an imputed interest rate of 3.45%.

Substantially all of our assets in which we hold an ownership interest are encumbered or have been pledged as collateral for our Secured Debt. Our debt contains certain restrictions on us incurring any additional indebtedness relating to secured assets, including the prohibition on incurring indebtedness in the form of borrowed money and/or evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes or other similar instruments without prior approval from our creditors. Our Secured Debt was amended in May 2012 to extend the maturity date to July 2014 and to require quarterly principal payments in the amount of $12.5 million in September 2012, December 2012 and March 2013, and in the amount of $15.625 million in each of June 2013, September 2013, December 2013 and March 2014. Our Secured Debt may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time. The terms of our Secured Debt allow for the sale of collateralized assets, subject to defined release prices, up to $225 million without premium on the resulting debt pay-down, and subject to defined premiums on the resulting debt pay-downs above that amount. At September 30, 2013, and each of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we were in compliance with the terms of our Secured Debt.

If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service our debt, we may be required to reduce capital expenditures or refinance all or a portion of our existing debt. Our ability to make scheduled principal payments and to pay interest on our debt depends on the future performance of our operations, which is subject to general conditions in or affecting the hotel industry that are beyond our control. See “Risk factors—Risks related to our business and industry” and “Risk factors—Risks relating to our indebtedness.”

All of our Secured Debt currently matures in July 2014. We do not expect to have sufficient cash on hand to pay the Secured Debt balances expected to exist at that time in full. As such, we intend to refinance our current debt facilities prior to or concurrently with the consummation of this offering, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so on favorable terms or at all. We currently anticipate that, upon a successful refinancing of our current debt facilities and completion of this offering, our net interest expense will decrease.

 

101


Table of Contents

Contractual obligations

The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012:

 

(in millions)    Total      Less than
1 year
     1-3 years      3-5 years      More than
5 years
 

 

 

Long-term debt obligations(1)(2)

   $ 2,900       $ 61       $ 2,839       $       $   

Capital lease obligations

              

Operating and ground leases

     113         3         7         6         97   

Contract acquisition costs

                                       

Purchase commitments

     32         32                           

Total contractual obligations

   $ 3,045       $ 96       $ 2,846       $ 6       $ 97   

 

 

 

(1)   The Secured Debt matures in July 2014.

 

(2)   Includes principal as well as interest payments. To project interest payments on floating rate debt, we have used a forward curve for 30-day LIBOR for interest payments to be made in the future.

The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2013 on a pro forma basis after giving effect to (i) the Pre-IPO Transactions (including the acquisition of the Previously Managed Portfolio), (ii) the anticipated use of the net proceeds from this offering as described in “Use of proceeds” and (iii) the intended refinancing of our current debt facilities:

 

(in millions)    Total      Less than
1 year
     1-3 years      3-5 years      More than
5 years
 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Long-term debt obligations

   $                    $                    $                    $                    $                

Capital lease obligations

              

Operating and ground leases

              

Contract acquisition costs

              

Purchase commitments

              

Total contractual obligations

   $         $         $         $         $     

 

 

In addition to the purchase commitments in the table above, in the normal course of business, we enter into purchase commitments for which we are reimbursed by our franchisees. These obligations have minimal or no impact on our net income and cash flow.

Off-balance sheet arrangements

We do not have off balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. Under certain franchise agreements, we have committed to provide certain incentive payments, reimbursements, rebates and other payments, to help defray the costs of construction, marketing and other costs associated with opening and operating a La Quinta hotel.

Critical accounting policies and estimates

The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods and the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes. We believe that of our significant accounting policies, which are

 

102


Table of Contents

described in Note 2: “Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies” in the audited financial statements of the Predecessor Entities included elsewhere in this prospectus, the following accounting policies are critical because they involve a higher degree of judgment, and the estimates required to be made were based on assumptions that are inherently uncertain. As a result, these accounting policies could materially affect our financial position, results of operations and related disclosures. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate these estimates and judgments based on historical experiences and various other factors that are believed to reflect the current circumstances. While we believe our estimates, assumptions and judgments are reasonable, they are based on information presently available. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates due to changes in judgments, assumptions and conditions as a result of unforeseen events or otherwise, which could have a material impact on financial position or results of operations.

Investments in long-lived assets

We annually review the performance of our long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets, for impairment, as well as when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We also identify properties we intend to sell and properties we intend to hold for use. For each lodging asset or group of assets held for use, we compare the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) generated by the asset or group of assets with its associated net carrying value. If the net carrying value of the asset or group of assets exceeds expected future cash flows, the excess of the net book value over estimated fair value is charged to impairment loss in the accompanying combined statements of operations. Properties held for sale are reported at the lower of their carrying amount of their estimated sales price, less estimated costs to sell.

We estimate fair value primarily using unobservable inputs by (1) calculating the discounted expected future cash flows and (2) calculating expected liquidated sales proceeds, relying on common hotel valuation methods such as multiples of room revenues or per room valuations. Our estimate of fair value of the asset using these unobservable inputs then becomes the new basis of the asset or group of assets and this new basis is then depreciated over the asset’s remaining useful life. We may be subject to impairment charges in the future, in the event that operating results of individual hotel operations are materially different from its forecasts, the economy or the lodging industry weakens or the estimated holding period of a hotel is shortened.

Guest loyalty program

Our guest loyalty program, “Returns,” allows members to earn points primarily based on certain dollars spent at our owned and franchised hotels or via our co-branded credit card. Members may redeem points earned for free night certificates, gift cards, airline miles and a variety of other awards. We account for the economic impact of points earned by accruing an estimate of its liability for unredeemed points. The expense related to this estimate includes the cost of administering the program, as well as the incremental cost of the stay at one of its hotels or the value of awards purchased from program partners. We estimate the future redemption obligation based upon historical experience, including an estimate of “breakage” for points that will never be redeemed. The estimate is based on a calculation that includes an assumption for the redemption rate, redemption type (whether for a free night certificate or other award), and rate of redemption at our owned hotels versus franchised hotels. Actual results of the Returns program, and the related expense and liability, may vary significantly from our estimates due primarily to variances from assumptions used in the calculation of its obligation for future

 

103


Table of Contents

redemptions and changes in member behavior. These variances are accounted for as changes in estimates and are charged to operations as they become known.

We had approximately $14 million of guest loyalty liability as of September 30, 2013. Changes in the estimates used in developing our breakage rate could result in a material change to our loyalty liability. Currently, a 10% decrease to the breakage estimate used in determining future award redemption obligations would increase our loyalty liability by approximately $2.6 million.

Insurance programs

Workers’ compensation, automobile and general liability

We maintain a retrospective loss deductible insurance program for workers’ compensation and automobile liability loss exposures, and a self-insured retention program for our commercial general liability loss exposures related to our lodging operations. A transfer of risk to an insurance underwriter is purchased for loss exposures in excess of the deductible and retention limits on both a primary and excess limits basis.

Case loss reserves are established for losses within the insurance and self-insured programs. These individual case reserves are estimates of amounts necessary to settle the claims as of the reporting date. These individual case estimates are based on known facts and interpretations of circumstances and legal standards and include the claims representatives’ expertise and experience with similar cases. These individual estimates change over time as additional facts and information become known.

On at least an annual basis, we perform a formal review of estimates of the ultimate liability for losses and associated expenses for each coverage component of the casualty insurance program within the deductible and self-insured retention. We engage outside actuaries who perform an analysis of historical development trends of loss frequency and severity in order to project the ultimate liability for losses, including incurred but not reported claims. The outside actuaries utilize various actuarial methods such as the loss triangle technique to derive loss development factors from the actual loss experience, which translate current case reserve value to an ultimate basis by measuring the historical change in valuations over time, which is characteristic of liability losses. Other methods such as “increased limits factors” are utilized for projecting losses and are calculated based on historical experience and represent an average over several years and used to estimate the ultimate loss. We revise our reserve amounts periodically based upon recognized changes in the development factors and trends that affect loss costs and their impact on the actuarial calculation. These estimates are influenced by external factors, including inflation, changes in law, court decisions and changes to regulatory requirements, economic conditions and public attitudes.

Employee healthcare

We maintain a self-insurance program for major medical and hospitalization coverage for our employees and their dependents, which is partially funded by payroll deductions. Payments for major medical and hospitalization to individual participants below specified amounts are self-insured by us. We base our estimate of ultimate liability on trends in claim payment history, historical trends in incurred but not reported incidents and developments in other cost components (such as rising medical costs, projected premium costs and the number of participants). Our liability with respect to employee healthcare reserves is monitored on a periodic basis and adjusted accordingly.

 

104


Table of Contents

Income taxes

We have various taxable subsidiaries and account for the taxable subsidiaries’ income taxes using the asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting purposes. For financial reporting purposes, income tax expense or benefit is based on reported financial accounting income or loss before non-controlling interests and income taxes related to our taxable subsidiaries. Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the temporary differences between assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting and the analogous amounts recognized for tax purposes using the statutory tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse, within the taxable subsidiaries. We evaluate the probability of realizing the future benefits of their deferred tax assets and provide a valuation allowance for the portion of any deferred tax assets where the likelihood of realizing an income tax benefit in the future does not meet the more-likely-than-not criteria for recognition.

We recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority.

See Note 12: “Income Taxes” in the audited condensed combined financial statements of the Predecessor Entities included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Legal contingencies

We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims, the outcomes of which are subject to significant uncertainty. We accrue an estimated amount for a loss contingency if it is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required when we evaluate, among other factors, the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss. Changes in these factors could materially impact our consolidated financial statements.

Consolidations

We use judgment evaluating whether we have a controlling financial interest in our partnership and other investments, including the assessment of the importance of rights and privileges of the partners based on voting rights, as well as financial interests that are not controllable through voting interests. If the entity is considered to be a variable interest entity (“VIE”), we use judgment determining whether we are the primary beneficiary, and then consolidate those VIEs for which we have determined we are the primary beneficiary. If the entity in which we hold an interest does not meet the definition of a VIE, we evaluate whether we have a controlling financial interest through our voting interests in the entity. We consolidate entities when we own more than 50 percent of the voting shares of a company or have a controlling general partner interest of a partnership, assuming the absence of other factors determining control, including the ability of minority owners to participate in or block certain decisions. Changes to judgments used in evaluating our partnership and other investments could materially impact our consolidated financial statements.

 

105


Table of Contents

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk

We are exposed to market risk primarily from changes in interest rates, which may impact future income, cash flows, and fair value of the Company, depending on changes to interest rates. In certain situations, we may seek to reduce cash flow volatility associated with changes in interest rates by entering into financial arrangements intended to provide a hedge against a portion of the risks associated with such volatility. We continue to have exposure to such risks to the extent they are not hedged. We enter into derivative financial arrangements to the extent they meet the objective described above, or are required by the terms of our debt facilities, and we do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest rate risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk on our floating rate debt. Interest rates on our floating rate debt discussed below are based on 30-day LIBOR, so we are most vulnerable to changes in this rate. The 30-day LIBOR rate decreased from 0.28 percent per annum as of December 31, 2011, to 0.21 percent per annum as of December 31, 2012, and to 0.18 percent per annum at September 30, 2013. Changes in interest rates also affect the fair value of our fixed rate debt and our fixed rate financing receivables.

Under the terms of our Secured Debt, we are required to hedge interest rate risk using derivative instruments, such as interest rate caps, under certain defined conditions, until the maturity date. As of September 30, 2013, we held six interest rate caps with an aggregate notional amount of $2.6 billion which cap LIBOR used to calculate the floating portion of the interest rate on our Secured Debt at 4.0 percent. The caps were executed in June 2013 to replace the previous portfolio of interest rate caps that expired in July 2013 and expire in July 2014. We have elected not to designate any of the interest rate caps as effective hedging instruments. The fair values of our interest rate caps were immaterial to our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2013. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we recorded a loss of $0.1 million in other income (loss) in our combined statement of operations, which represented the premiums paid on these interest rate caps. No other gain or loss related to the undesignated interest rate caps in our current portfolio or previous portfolio that expired in July 2013 were recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as changes in the fair values of our interest rate caps were immaterial.

The following table sets forth the scheduled maturities and the total fair value as of September 30, 2013 for our financial instruments that are materially affected by interest rate risks (in millions, excluding average interest rate):

 

     Maturities by period     Carying
value
    Fair
value
 
    2013     2014     2015     2016     2017     Thereafter      

 

 

Floating rate Secured Debt

  $ 16      $ 2,784      $      $      $      $      $ 2,800      $ 2,794   

Weighted average interest rate(1)

                5.153%     

 

 

 

(1)   Weighted average interest rate as of September 30, 2013.

Refer to our Note 10: “Fair Value Measurements” in the audited combined financial statements of the Predecessor Entities as of December 30, 2012 included elsewhere in this prospectus for further discussion of the fair value measurements of our financial assets and liabilities.

 

106


Table of Contents

Recently issued accounting standards

In July 2012, the provisions of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2012-02 were released. ASU 2012-02 gives the option to perform a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of its indefinite-lived intangible assets. If this option is selected, a company is not required to calculate the fair value of its indefinite-lived intangible assets unless the company determines it is more likely than not that fair value is less that the carrying amount for such assets. The provisions of ASU 2012-02 are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, although early adoption is permitted. We have elected not to early adopt the provisions of ASU 2012-02, and do not anticipate that the new provisions will have any impact on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2013-02. This ASU amends existing guidance by requiring companies to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required to be reclassified in its entirety to net income in the same reporting period. For amounts which are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, companies will be required to cross reference other disclosures that provide information about those amounts. We adopted ASU 2013-02 prospectively as of January 1, 2013. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11. This ASU provides guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward exists in the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from disallowance of the tax position. We plan to adopt ASU 2013-11 prospectively as of January 1, 2014, and we are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this ASU will have on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or disclosures.

 

107


Table of Contents

Industry

The lodging sector is a significant part of the U.S. economy, generating over $155.5 billion of revenues in 2012, according to data provided by STR. As of September 2013, the U.S. hotel sector comprised approximately 53,000 hotels with more than 4.9 million rooms, of which 69% were affiliated with a brand. Over the 25 years ended December 31, 2012, the sector revenue has grown at a CAGR of 4.8%. The industry can be segmented from a brand perspective across STR chain scale categories and from an operating structure across real estate ownership, franchise and third party management.

Chain scale segments

Hotels can be divided into STR chain scale categories or groupings of generally competitive brands as follows:

 

 

Luxury—typically offers first class appointments and an extensive range of on-property amenities and services, including restaurants, spas, recreational facilities, business centers, concierges, room service and local transportation (shuttle service to airport and/or local attractions). According to STR, the average of the ADR for the luxury chain scale in 2012 was $274.99.

 

 

Upper upscale—typically offers well-appointed properties that offer a full range of on-property amenities and services, including restaurants, spas, recreational facilities, business centers, concierges, room service and local transportation (shuttle service to airport and/or local attractions). According to STR, the average of the ADR for the upper upscale chain scale in 2012 was $154.34.

 

 

Upscale—typically offers a full range of on-property amenities and services, including restaurants, spas, recreational facilities, business centers, concierges, room service and local transportation (shuttle service to airport and/or local attractions). According to STR, the average of the ADR for the upscale chain scale in 2012 was $116.85.

 

 

Upper midscale—typically offers limited food service (which may include restaurants), vending, selected business services, partial recreational facilities (either a pool or fitness equipment) and limited transportation (airport shuttle). According to STR, the average of the ADR for the upper midscale chain scale in 2012 was $97.38.

 

 

Midscale—typically offers limited breakfast, selected business services, limited recreational facilities (either a pool or fitness equipment) and limited transportation (airport shuttle). According to STR, for the midscale chain scale in 2012 was $74.57.

 

 

Economy—typically offers basic amenities and may offer a limited breakfast. According to STR, the average of the ADR for the economy chain scale in 2012 was $52.51.

 

108


Table of Contents

The following table shows the total room count per each STR chain scale category and the independent segment in the United States at October 31, 2013. The STR midscale and upper midscale segments are predominantly comprised of brands that are affiliated with broader multi-branded companies. La Quinta’s STR competitive sets most often include Comfort, Holiday Inn Express and/or Hampton.

 

Chain scale    Brand examples    Room
count
     % of total
room
count
     Avg.
number of
rooms per
hotel
 

 

 

Luxury

   Four Seasons, Ritz Carlton, W Hotel      107,515         2.2%         339.2   

Upper Upscale

   Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, Sheraton      561,630         11.4%         360.7   

Upscale

   Cambria Suites, Courtyard, Hilton Garden Inn      609,244         12.4%         153.4   

Upper Midscale

   Comfort, Hampton, Holiday Inn Express      871,829         17.7%         97.7   

Midscale

   Best Western, La Quinta, Ramada, Quality,      476,685         9.7%         86.8   

Economy

   Days Inn, Econo Lodge, Red Roof Inn, Super 8      769,911         15.6%         76.1   
     

 

 

 

Sub-Total Brand Affiliated

        3,396,814         68.9%         111.8   
     

 

 

 

Independents

        1,533,526         31.1%         68.0   
     

 

 

 

Total All Hotels

        4,930,340         100.0%         93.2   

 

 

Source: STR

Hotel operating structures

The U.S. lodging industry is generally segmented into three different operating structures: real estate ownership, franchise and third party management. Some companies employ only one component while other companies employ a combination of operating structures.

 

 

Ownership—Hotels are owned by a company and are operated either by the company’s own management team or by an independent third party manager. Hotels may be branded under a franchise agreement, may be operated under a management agreement in which the manager brings it own brand to the hotel, or may be operated under the owner’s brand or as an independent hotel. Ownership requires a more substantial capital commitment as compared to other models but can offer high returns due to the owner’s ability to influence margins by driving RevPAR, managing operating expenses and financial leverage. The ownership model has a high fixed-cost structure that results in a high degree of operating leverage relative to RevPAR performance. As a result, profits escalate rapidly in a lodging up-cycle but can erode quickly in a downturn. Profits from an ownership model generally increase at a greater rate from RevPAR growth attributable to ADR growth, than from occupancy gains since there are more incremental costs associated with higher guest volumes compared to higher pricing.

 

 

Franchise—Franchisors license their brands to a hotel owner, providing the hotel owner the right to use the brand name, logo, operating practices and reservations systems in exchange for a fee and an agreement to operate the hotel in accordance with the franchisor’s brand standards. Under a typical franchise agreement, the hotel owner pays the franchisor an initial fee, a percentage-of-revenue royalty fee and a marketing/reservation fee. A franchisor’s

 

109


Table of Contents
 

revenues are dependent on the number of rooms in its system and the top-line performance of those hotels. Earnings drivers include RevPAR increases, unit growth and effective royalty rate improvement. Franchisors enjoy significant operating leverage in their business model since it typically costs little to add a new hotel franchise to an existing system.

 

 

Third party management—Third party management companies operate hotels on behalf of the hotel owner but do not, themselves, own the hotel. These companies collect base management fees which are typically a percentage of hotel revenue and incentive management fees which are tied to the financial performance of the hotel. The hotels may be operated under a franchise agreement and/or management agreement, or as an independent hotel. Similar to franchising activities, the key drivers of revenue based management fees are RevPAR and unit growth and similar to ownership activities, profit based fees are driven by improved hotel margins and RevPAR growth.

U.S. lodging industry performance

Lodging industry performance is generally tied to both macro-economic and micro-economic trends in the United States and, similar to other industries, experiences both positive and negative operating cycles. Positive cycles are characterized as periods of increasing RevPAR and hotel development. These cycles usually continue until the economy sustains a prolonged downturn, excess supply conditions exist or some external factor occurs such as war, terrorism or natural resource shortages. Negative cycles are characterized by hoteliers reducing room rates to stimulate occupancy and a reduction of hotel development. Industry recovery usually begins with an increase in occupancy followed by hoteliers increasing room rates. As demand begins to exceed room supply, occupancies and rates continue to improve.

The following graph illustrates historical and projected U.S. supply, demand and RevPAR growth. The trends are derived from historical data provided by STR and projections provided by PKF-HR.

Historical and Projected U.S. Supply, Demand and RevPAR Growth

 

LOGO

Source: STR (2005-2012), PKF-HR (2013-2015)

 

110


Table of Contents

Select-service segment performance

Select-service hotels generally serve the midscale and upper-midscale chain segments as defined by STR. Select-service hotels typically have fewer costly services and amenities than full-service hotels, which results in an efficient hotel-level cost structure. Select-service hotels typically have limited food and beverage outlets and do not offer comprehensive business or banquet facilities.

The midscale and upper-midscale segments tend to follow the cyclicality of the overall lodging industry and have also improved with the economic recovery in recent years. The following tables illustrate historical and projected midscale and upper-midscale U.S. supply, demand and RevPAR growth. The trends are derived from historical data provided by STR and projections provided by PKF-HR. Industry forecasts for RevPAR for both the midscale and upper-midscale segments remain positive for the next several years as the hotel industry is expected to continue to benefit from a supply and demand imbalance. We believe that the fundamentals of the U.S. lodging industry in the midscale and upper-midscale segments will yield strong industry segment performance and support the growth of our business.

Historical U.S. Midscale/Upper-Midscale Supply, Demand and RevPAR Growth

 

LOGO

Source: STR (2005-2012)

Projected U.S. Midscale/Upper-Midscale Supply, Demand and RevPAR Growth

 

LOGO

Source: PKF-HR (2013-2015)

 

111


Table of Contents

Business

Company overview

We are a leading owner, operator and franchisor of select-service hotels primarily serving the midscale and upper-midscale segments under the La Quinta brand. Based on data provided by STR, La Quinta is the fastest growing principal select-service hotel brand in the United States in these segments in terms of percentage growth of number of hotels over the last ten years ended December 31, 2012, growing our total number of hotels from 362 in 2003 to 836 as of September 30, 2013, significantly outpacing the growth of hotels franchised, owned and operated by Comfort, Holiday Inn Express and Hampton, the hotel brands one or more of which is most often included in our STR competitive sets, which we refer to as our “main STR competitive set”. Our system-wide portfolio, as of September 30, 2013, consisted of 836 hotels representing approximately 84,000 rooms located predominantly across 46 U.S. states, as well as in Canada and Mexico, of which 370 hotels were owned and operated and 466 were franchised. We also have a pipeline of 175 franchised hotels as of September 30, 2013, to be located in the United States, Mexico, Canada, Colombia and Honduras.

The following table illustrates the growth in number of our owned and franchised hotels from 2002 to December 31, 2012.

 

LOGO

 

(1)   Certain of our owned hotels were previously operated by us as non-La Quinta hotels and are not included in this table until such time as they were converted to La Quinta-branded hotels. From the Acquisition through September 30, 2013 and primarily in 2006, we converted 128 hotels.

We primarily derive our revenues from owned hotel operations and fees generated from franchised and managed hotels. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we generated total revenue of $818.0 million, Adjusted EBITDA of $297.8 million and net income from continuing

 

112


Table of Contents

operations of $17.1 million, in each case, including the Previously Managed Portfolio as franchised and managed hotels. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA, see “Summary historical combined financial data.”

We are focused on providing clean and comfortable guest rooms at affordable prices in convenient locations. Our hotels have fewer costly services and amenities than full-service hotels, which we believe results in a highly efficient hotel-level cost structure. Our hotels typically include common areas with amenities such as a great room (including breakfast seating area, lobby with seating area and business center), swimming pool and vending areas and generally offer a complimentary breakfast. As of September 30, 2013, the hotels in our system consisted of 556 La Quinta Inn & Suites, which include guest suites and are generally our newer hotels, and 280 La Quinta Inns. Our guest mix includes both business and leisure travelers.

La Quinta was founded in San Antonio, Texas in 1968 and has a 45-year history of owning and operating hotels and, from 1973 to January 2006, we operated through our predecessors as a public company. In 2006, we were acquired by Blackstone (the “Acquisition”) and assembled a management team led by lodging industry and La Quinta veteran Wayne Goldberg, our President and Chief Executive Officer. At the time of the Acquisition, we had a total of 425 hotels, 267 owned hotels and 158 franchised hotels. Since 2007, we have focused on growing our franchise business and investing in significant repositioning capital designed to increase our market penetration.

We began franchising the La Quinta brand in order to more rapidly expand our hotel system, promote brand awareness and drive growth without significant capital investment. Since the Acquisition and through September 30, 2013, we have aggressively grown our franchise business in the United States and expanded into international markets. During that period, we expanded our franchise system by approximately three times, growing from 158 franchised hotels to 466 franchised hotels. We also established a franchise presence in Mexico, Central America and South America, with 22 hotels either open or in the pipeline in those regions.

From 2007 through September 30, 2013, in addition to customary recurring capital expenditures such as repair and maintenance, cycle renovations and ongoing maintenance of our technology infrastructure, we invested approximately $301 million in our owned hotel portfolio and infrastructure, which we consider repositioning capital. We believe this investment has contributed to the overall improved perception of our brand and our ability to increase our ADR, occupancy and RevPAR Index for our owned hotels from 2007 through September 30, 2013. While we do not currently have any plans for major projects that would require additional repositioning capital expenditures, we will continue to evaluate projects and invest in those that we believe will provide an appropriate return on capital invested and increased RevPAR Index. We will also continue to make customary recurring capital expenditures.

Repositioning capital investments spent over this period have included $145 million for improvements across our owned hotel portfolio, including acceleration of some aspects of normal cycle renovations, and $38 million for upgrades to our technology infrastructure. Repositioning capital was used to update guest rooms at our owned hotels to generally include:

 

 

a 32” flat panel high definition television

 

quilted, pillow-top mattress

 

large work desk with an ergonomic “task” chair

 

high speed internet access

 

113


Table of Contents
 

coffee maker

 

high-flow shower heads and curved shower rods

Additionally, repositioning capital also included over $75 million expended to upgrade the 128 hotels we converted from non-La Quinta hotels to La Quinta-branded hotels since the Acquisition and $42 million to develop our flagship downtown Chicago property.

Recurring capital expenditures from 2007 through September 30, 2013 totaled approximately $427 million. Recurring capital expenditures are comprised of repair and maintenance in ordinary course operations, customary cycle renovations (renovations which take place on an as needed basis but average across our owned portfolio once every six years and range from design renovations to full renovations) and ongoing maintenance of our technology infrastructure in order to keep it current. Customary cycle renovations can include, among other things, replacement of mattresses, seating, fixtures or carpet, repainting, window treatments and improvements in the common areas. We maintain a variety of designs and décor scheme options for our rooms and select the room scheme for a given hotel’s cycle renovation based on market factors and our review of the optimal return for the capital invested.

Our competitive strengths

We believe that the following competitive strengths position us to execute on our business plan and growth strategies.

 

 

Scalable and efficient business model with attractive cash flow characteristics.    Our hotel product offering is efficient, replicable and supported by a scalable operational, technological and administrative platform. Over 98% of our owned hotel revenue is derived solely from room rentals, as compared to 65% for full-service hotels, according to STR, and our operating margins in 2012 were 46% as compared to 30% for full-service hotels. As a select-service hotel brand, our hotels require fewer costly services, amenities and capital expenditures than full-service hotels, resulting in what we believe to be a highly efficient hotel-level cost structure, strong Adjusted EBITDA margins and stable cash flows. Even during the height of the recent economic downturn in 2009, our Adjusted EBITDA margins remained above 32% as compared to approximately 20% for full-service hotels, based on data provided by STR. In addition, our model enables us to manage corporate overhead expenses even though the number of our hotels, particularly the number of our franchised hotels, has increased substantially. Moreover, our year-to-date 2013 Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margins for our owned portfolio remain below comparable 2008 metrics, which we believe represents significant capacity for future organic growth at our hotels.

 

 

Established and rapidly growing franchise business.    Over the last ten years, we have grown our total number of franchised hotels from 56 in 2002 to 466 as of September 30, 2013, achieving a franchise compounded annual growth rate of 22%. Our franchise business requires little or no capital investment by us (which we refer to as “capital light”), and has substantial scale and an established infrastructure that we believe positions us to achieve meaningful franchise growth as development capital for franchisees continues to become more available. As of September 30, 2013, we had a diversified group of 437 franchisees with over 93% of our franchisees either operating or developing less than three La Quinta hotels. The hotels in our franchise portfolio have an average age of 13 years, with 40% of our franchise portfolio less than 5 years old. Despite the strong decade of growth, we are still less than half the size of our main STR competitive set, allowing room for continued aggressive franchise growth in a

 

114


Table of Contents
 

number of under-penetrated U.S. markets. As of September 30, 2013, we have a large pipeline of 175 franchised hotels (of which 80% are new construction), each represented by an executed franchise agreement, which upon completion would represent a 38% expansion of our total existing franchise system. Given our founding and significant presence in Texas, our presence in the U.S. southern border states and our established brand history with travelers from this region, we believe La Quinta has significant brand awareness in Mexico and believe Mexico, Central America and South America provide opportunities for significant franchise growth internationally where we have laid the foundation for expansion. As our franchise business continues to grow, we expect cash flow from this segment will comprise a higher percentage of our total cash flow. Given that the average remaining term of our existing franchise contracts is approximately 14 years, we believe that our existing franchisees provide a long-term stable income stream. Additionally, we anticipate our franchise revenues will grow over time as new franchise agreements and renewals of existing franchise agreements are executed at our newly published rates, which include a 4.5% royalty fee, which is higher than the 4.0% royalty fee generally applicable to our franchise agreements currently in effect.

 

 

Widely recognized and differentiated brand.    We own, operate and franchise all of our hotels under a single brand, La Quinta, a highly recognizable brand in the select-service market, established over a 45-year history. We also ranked #2 among the 15 hotel chains surveyed in the 2013 Temkin Experience Ratings. Additionally, we have a loyal base of customers and a growing loyalty program, La Quinta Returns, with nearly nine million members as of September 30, 2013. We believe the capital investments we have made to upgrade and reposition our brand and hotel experience have helped to improve our brand awareness, brand perception, guest loyalty and guest experience. Our improved experience, brand perception and growing loyalty have contributed to consistent market share increases as reflected by our RevPAR Index growth. After experiencing a decrease in RevPAR Index of 340 basis points from 2006 to 2007, principally due to the conversion over that period of 128 non-La Quinta hotels to La Quinta-branded hotels, from the year ended December 31, 2007 through September 30, 2013, our RevPAR Index has increased over 1000 basis points from 88.8% to 99.2%. We believe that the demonstrated strength of our brand and loyal customer base drive revenues for our existing owned and franchised hotels and also makes us attractive to new franchisees.

 

 

Owner and operator business model promotes alignment with our franchisees.    Our position as an owner and operator of La Quinta-branded hotels creates an alignment of economic interest with our franchisees, which we believe is a differentiating factor among our competitors. We are focused on delivering value to our guests, which generates repeat stays and increases guest loyalty. Delivering value combined with the benefits of an increasing market presence through our growth in the number of hotels has strengthened our brand. We believe this focus and the powerful alignment with our franchisees drive strong operating results and financial returns which benefit both us and our franchisees and will continue to benefit and grow our business in the future. We have an active advisory Brand Council that includes both Company and franchisee representation and meets three to four times a year to discuss ways to improve the performance of our hotels. Through the Brand Council, we often test new concepts at both owned and franchised hotels, which we believe promotes collaboration between us and our franchisees. We believe our model incentivizes franchisees to invest in growing the La Quinta brand through additional capital investment into existing franchised hotels and through the development of new La Quinta hotels.

 

 

115


Table of Contents
 

Highly experienced and successful management team.    Our management team has extensive experience in hospitality, consumer-facing and brand-based companies, with a proven track record for delivering strong results. Our executive management team has an average industry tenure of 19 years, including Wayne Goldberg with 34 years of select-service experience, Rajiv Trivedi, our Chief Development Officer, with 23 years of industry experience and Angelo Lombardi, our Chief Operating Officer, with 24 years of industry experience. In addition, Keith Cline, our Chief Financial Officer, who joined our executive management team in January 2013, brings over 21 years of finance, accounting and brand experience, including over 12 years of public company experience. Management has developed a culture of strong collaboration and teamwork that runs throughout the organization and has contributed to La Quinta’s successful performance.

Our strategies

The following are key elements of our strategy to become the preferred select-service brand for our guests and franchise partners.

 

 

Take advantage of our significant capital investment to optimize the performance of our owned hotels.    We will continue to focus on maximizing revenues and managing costs at each of our owned hotels. As of September 30, 2013, we had 370 owned hotels, representing 44% of our system-wide portfolio. We intend to drive revenue growth by employing our active revenue management strategies and increasing our ADR, share of hotel stays by return guests, membership in our Returns program, overall brand awareness and volume of our corporate guests. There is currently a meaningful ADR differential between us and the hotels in our main STR competitive sets. We believe the significant amount of capital we have spent since 2007 to reposition and improve the brand and the quality of our hotels, the growth in the number of hotel units in our system and the resulting increased brand awareness will allow us to continue to increase ADR. We estimate that in 2012 each $1 increase in ADR across our owned portfolio would have increased our Adjusted EBITDA for our owned hotels by approximately $11 million, assuming all other variables remained constant. We also intend to continue to make recurring capital expenditures to invest in and renovate our owned hotels to maintain a consistent standard for our brand and improve the overall quality of our hotels. We further expect to continue to enhance the profitability of our owned hotels by maximizing cost efficiencies through disciplined cost control and focusing on operational enhancements. We continually evaluate our owned hotel portfolio and, from time to time, we may sell certain hotels that we determine detract from our brand.

 

 

Continue to aggressively grow our capital light franchise business both domestically and internationally.    A primary element of our growth strategy is to continue to grow the number of units in our higher margin, scalable franchise fee-based business. As of September 30, 2013, we had 466 franchised hotels, representing 56% of our system-wide portfolio. Additionally, we have a large pipeline of 175 franchised hotels, 80% of which represents new construction, rather than the conversion of an existing hotel. We believe that there remains meaningful opportunity for continued growth in the United States, with La Quinta under-penetrated in many of the markets served by our main STR competitive set, including the Northeast and Northwest. For example, we are represented in 63% of the 628 U.S. defined market tracts and have an average 2.08 hotels in such represented markets, whereas the hotel brands of our main STR competitive set are represented in over 90% of such market tracts and have an average 3.07 hotels in our represented markets. We also intend to add new domestic

 

116


Table of Contents
 

franchised hotels in highly populated urban locations to serve a wider group of guests and increase brand awareness. We believe the opportunity for franchise growth in Mexico, Central America and South America is significant given our existing infrastructure, established brand history with travelers from these regions and our presence in the U.S. southern border states and Mexico. We have dedicated franchise and sales personnel who are focused exclusively on our franchise operations in these regions. As of September 30, 2013, we had 22 hotels either open or in the pipeline and continue to explore other franchise opportunities in these international markets.

 

 

Continue to increase La Quinta brand awareness.    We will continue to invest in marketing and brand building in order to increase awareness and differentiation of the La Quinta brand to improve hotel performance in our owned and franchised hotels and attract new La Quinta franchisees. We are able to concentrate our marketing and advertising efforts under a single brand rather than spreading them across multiple brands, which we believe enhances our ability to raise awareness of La Quinta hotels. Our owned and franchised hotels contribute 2.5% of gross room revenues to our BMF to support our marketing and build the brand and, from 2007 to the twelve month period ended September 30, 2013, total contributions to our BMF have grown 26% to $38.3 million, and, for the twelve months ended September 30, 2013, 46% of contributions to the BMF, or $17.7 million, were funded by our franchisees. We expect amounts available in the BMF and the percentage of such amounts contributed by our franchisees to continue to grow as the number of hotels in the La Quinta system grows and the performance of our hotels continues to improve. We will seek to continue to expand existing relationships and develop new relationships with franchise owners who demonstrate an ability to provide an excellent guest experience and maintain our brand standards, and who can broaden our reach into existing and under penetrated markets. We will continue to focus on growing our loyal customer base by increasing the membership in La Quinta Returns, our loyalty program designed to increase stays and raise market share. Our nearly nine million La Quinta Returns members as of September 30, 2013 (representing growth of 138% in membership since January 1, 2008) generated 47% of room revenues at our owned and franchised hotels for the twelve months ended September 30, 2013 (representing a 113% increase in room revenue contribution at owned and franchised hotels since 2008). In 2011, we introduced our “Taking Care of Business” national advertising campaign, featuring points of differentiation and the role of people and service in delighting our guests with our “Here For You” branded guest experience. We will continue to test media, technology, social platforms and email campaigns to find new ways to strengthen our brand.

 

 

Expand distribution channels and grow corporate accounts.    In 2012, revenues from bookings made through our website increased by 11%, while total electronic distribution revenues increased 15%, each as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. In addition, we launched a new mobile site and introduced our new LQ Instant Hold feature (patent pending), which permits our guests to use a mobile application to hold a room for up to 4 hours from any smart device by just entering a phone number. We will continue to develop our online and mobile channels in an effort to use lower cost, proprietary distribution channels. We will also seek to grow our market share by establishing new online relationships as new technologies and platforms are introduced. La Quinta is also well recognized in the corporate community and, for the twelve months ended September 30, 2013, corporate accounts, including government and military accounts, generated 25% of room revenue at our owned and franchised hotels. We will seek to increase room revenues from corporate accounts, as we believe such accounts are associated with more consistent demand and longer stays.

 

117


Table of Contents

Our mission

We are guided by two prime goals that we believe contribute to a high level of employee and guest engagement:

1. Live our core values, which are defined by our people:

 

 

People:    People are the heart of the company. Make coming to La Quinta the best part of their day.

 

 

Passion:    Approach our work each day with a sense of ownership and personal pride. Always do whatever it takes.

 

 

Integrity:    Always do the right thing, even when no one is watching.

 

 

Excellence:    Doing ordinary things extraordinarily well. Good is not good enough; strive for the best in all we do.

 

 

Unique:    We are a big company that acts like a small company, we are not afraid to be different.

2. Delight our guests with an experience that makes them feel:

 

 

Assured:    Secure, confident they made the right choice with La Quinta. Provide cues of assurance with a well-lit parking lot, a beautifully landscaped entry or a person at the front desk at all times.

 

 

Settled in:    Comfortable, relaxed in their surroundings. We create moments for settling in with a spotlessly clean, well-maintained room, fresh towels and a clutter-free desk.

 

 

Optimistic:    Ready to take on the new day—whatever it holds. When our guests feel assured and settled in, they are able to feel “up,” optimistic—ready to take on their day. It’s our brand promise of waking up on the bright side.

Our two goals can be summarized using a single phrase—“Here For You.” It is not a program or a slogan, but a way of life at La Quinta that is built upon the purpose and core values that guide us. Our values are delivered by people who have a unique passion to enhance our guests’ experience and create enduring relationships by striving for excellence and serving with integrity every day. “Here For You” creates meaningful and differentiated experiences that are uniquely La Quinta and provides us with a powerful business advantage. “Here For You” provides valuable insight into not only what motivates our team members and drives them to perform and innovate; it also helps to inform our strategies through a better understanding of guest preferences which drives business results.

Our brand and hotels

Our brand has gone through a significant transformation and repositioning since the Acquisition under the leadership of our management team led by industry veteran Wayne Goldberg. We have experienced significant growth in the total number of La Quinta hotels in the United States, driven primarily by the rapid expansion of our franchise business. As of September 30, 2013, our system-wide hotel portfolio consisted of 836 hotels representing approximately 84,000 rooms across 46 U.S. states, Canada and Mexico, of which 370 hotels were owned and operated and 466

 

118


Table of Contents

were franchised. As of September 30, 2013, we also had a pipeline of 175 franchised hotels, each represented by an executed franchise agreement. Nineteen of these properties are to be located in Mexico, Canada, Colombia or Honduras. The remaining properties are to be located throughout the United States, with 52 in Texas, 13 in Oklahoma, 10 in New York and the remaining 81 properties dispersed among 33 other states. As of September 30, 2013, over 50% of our existing hotel portfolio and our pipeline is located in states ranked in the first quartile in terms of economic growth projections for 2014 through 2020 by IHS Global Insight.

We own our owned hotels through wholly owned subsidiaries except for one hotel, which is owned by a joint venture in which we own a controlling interest. Generally, our owned hotels include the land, related easements and rights, buildings, improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment, though certain of our owned hotels are located on land leased by us pursuant to ground leases with third parties.

As of September 30, 2013, the hotels in our system consisted of 556 La Quinta Inn & Suites, which include guest suites and are generally our newer hotels, and 280 La Quinta Inns. As of September 30, 2013, of our system-wide hotels, approximately 23% serve the upper-midscale segment, approximately 59% serve the midscale segment, approximately 11% (principally our owned hotels) serve the economy segment and the balance serves the remaining segments. Our hotels typically include common areas with amenities such as a great room (including breakfast seating area, lobby with seating area and business center), swimming pool and vending areas, and typically offer a complimentary breakfast. As of September 30, 2013, the hotels in our owned portfolio have an average age of 26 years, and the hotels in our franchise portfolio have an average age of 13 years.

To ensure continued overall quality, we regularly repair and maintain our hotels, and annually review each hotel to assess the need for renovations based on asset condition. For our owned hotel portfolio, renovations take place on an as needed basis but average once every six years and range from design renovations to full renovations. In addition, we evaluate our hotels for updates to improve our competitive position.

Current designs for La Quinta Inn & Suites hotels are a minimum of three-story structures and approximately 50,600 square feet with approximately 100 interior corridor guest rooms. International La Quinta Inn & Suites generally also include expanded breakfast offerings, full-service restaurants and may be up to ten stories and between 98 and 140 rooms and suites. Current designs for La Quinta Inns hotels are on average 51,000 square feet with 121 guest rooms. Virtually all new franchised hotels are La Quinta Inn & Suites. Certain of our owned hotels are larger than our typical design. For example, our hotel in downtown Chicago, which was converted from office space to a La Quinta-branded hotel in 2009, is approximately 141,000 square feet with 241 guest rooms.

At both our La Quinta Inn & Suites and La Quinta Inns, our guests typically have convenient access to food service at nearby freestanding restaurants, which include many national chains. We have an ownership interest in approximately 70 buildings that are adjacent to our hotels, which we generally lease to third party restaurant operators.

 

119


Table of Contents

The table below sets forth the number of hotels and rooms as of September 30, 2013(1):

 

      Owned      Franchised      Total  
     # of hotels      # of rooms      # of hotels      # of rooms      # of hotels      # of rooms  

 

 

Texas

     83         10,999         138         10,093         221         21,092   

Florida

     56         6,921         23         1,952         79         8,873   

California

     22         3,270         32         2,652         54         5,922   

Georgia

     15         1,821         21         1,502         36         3,323   

Louisiana

     14         1,922         16         997         30         2,919   

Colorado

     15         1,892         11         908         26         2,800   

Tennessee

     9         1,118         12         934         21         2,052   

Oklahoma

     3         404         19         1,534         22         1,938   

Alabama

     10         1,194         8         602         18         1,796   

New Mexico

     8         913         10         701         18         1,614   

Other states

     135         16,570         170         14,689         305         31,259   

United States Total

     370         47,024         460         36,564         830         83,588   

Canada

           1         74         1         74   

Mexico

           5         644         5         644   

Total

     370         47,024         466         37,282         836         84,306   

 

 

 

(1)   This table treats the Previously Managed Portfolio as owned hotels. See “Basis of Presentation.”

In addition, our franchise agreements allow us to require franchised hotels to replace furnishings every five to seven years and require upgrades to meet then-current brand standards at any time, but we may not require substantial upgrading or remodeling more often than once every five years. Since the Acquisition and through September 30, 2013, we have prioritized (1) expanding our franchise business both in the United States and internationally and (2) upgrading our owned portfolio, driven by significant capital investment.

We continually evaluate our owned hotel portfolio and, from time to time, we may sell certain hotels that we determine detract from our brand. For example, beginning in 2012, we conducted a review of our portfolio of hotels and subsequently decided to sell 33 of our La Quinta hotels. As of September 30, 2013, 17 La Quinta hotels were designated as assets held for sale and the results of their operations have been classified as discontinued operations. Sales of 13 of these La Quinta hotels have already closed, and we expect that we will sell the remaining 4 hotels prior to the consummation of this offering. These sold hotels will exit the La Quinta system. In addition to these 17 La Quinta-branded hotels, 11 Baymont-branded hotels which we owned as a franchisee were sold on August 8, 2013. See “Basis of presentation.”

 

120


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our key operating statistics for our owned, franchised and managed hotels for the past five years and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012(1):

 

     As of and for the
nine-month
period ended
September 30,
    As of and for the year ended December 31,  
  2013     2012     2012     2011     2010     2009     2008  

 

 

Number of Hotels in Operation

             

Company Owned Hotels

             

La Quinta Inn & Suites

    188        188        188        188        188        188        188   

La Quinta Inns

    182        198        198        198        198        199        198   

Total Owned

    370        386        386        386        386        387        386   

Franchised/Managed Hotels

             

La Quinta Inn & Suites

    368        340        352        328        312        269        209   

La Quinta Inns

    98        99        97        102        110        110        113   

Total Franchised/Managed

    466        439        449        430        422        379        322   

Total

    836        825        835        816        808        766        708   

Occupancy Percentage

             

Company Owned Hotels

    65.9%        64.3%        62.7%        61.2%        59.6%        58.1%        63.7%   

Franchised/Managed Hotels

    65.9%        64.2%        62.8%        61.0%        56.4%        53.6%        60.9%   

Total

    65.9%        64.2%        62.7%        61.1%        58.4%        56.5%        62.8%   

Average Daily Rate

             

Company Owned Hotels

  $ 74.96      $ 70.89      $ 70.55      $ 67.22      $ 65.10      $ 66.02      $ 73.30   

Franchised/Managed Hotels

  $ 85.69      $ 82.31      $ 81.80      $ 78.11      $ 76.39      $ 78.26      $ 83.65   

Total

  $ 79.62      $ 75.60      $ 75.21      $ 71.59      $ 69.38      $ 70.20      $ 76.40   

RevPAR

             

Company Owned Hotels

  $ 49.40      $ 45.57      $ 44.21      $ 41.11      $ 38.82      $ 38.33      $ 46.66   

Franchised/Managed Hotels

  $ 56.45      $ 52.84      $ 51.37      $ 47.64      $ 43.08      $ 41.97      $ 50.98   

Total

  $ 52.46      $ 48.57      $ 47.17      $ 43.74      $ 40.49      $ 39.64      $ 48.00   

 

 

 

(1)   This table treats the Previously Managed Portfolio as “Company Owned Hotels.” See “Basis of presentation.”

Our owned hotel operations

Centralized corporate services for our owned hotels include marketing, global and regional sales, revenue management, accounting, finance, treasury, tax, information systems, construction and design, purchasing, legal, risk management, human resources and training. Although our corporate headquarters is located in Irving, Texas, we have organized our owned hotel operations into 15 regions. Management for each region, which is located within each region and reports directly to our senior management, is responsible for the day-to-day operations, guest experience and profitability of their hotels.

Each owned hotel is operated as an individual profit center, generally with an on-site general manager who oversees all day-to-day operations. Our general managers focus their attention on delivering our “Here For You” guest experience, maintaining clean and comfortable guest rooms and achieving profitable operations. Their responsibilities also include recruiting, training and supervising the hotel’s staff. A typical owned hotel has approximately 20 to 25 employees, including the general manager, housekeepers, laundry attendants, maintenance staff, front desk guest service representatives and a night auditor.

 

121


Table of Contents

Our general managers receive a comprehensive five-week training program through LQUniversity, our nationally recognized training and development program. Our team of trainers has both training and operational experience. LQUniversity offers comprehensive training solutions to enable our owned hotels to operate more successfully and deliver on our “Here For You” guest experience. Many of these same programs are made available to franchisees. We also utilize assistant managers to support the general managers at certain hotels, which provide a pool of experienced candidates to fill open general manager positions as needed and as we grow our portfolio.

We use target-driven operational budgets prepared by our general managers that are deployed after review with our senior management. Under the direction of our revenue management team, the hotel general managers, field leadership team and senior management continually review our room rates and price rooms into the demand curve based on the prevailing market conditions at each owned hotel. Each general manager can earn financial incentives based upon achieving favorable results in comparison to revenue and profit targets and upon achieving targeted goals in their RevPAR Index and Net Promoter scores for their respective hotel. Our Net Promoter score, which measures a guest’s intent to recommend our brand, is calculated through guest satisfaction surveys that are conducted by an independent market research company. These surveys provide guest feedback on each of our hotels. Financial incentives reward our general managers for improvements in Net Promoter scores which are indicative of guest satisfaction levels. We believe this incentive program increases our general managers’ focus on operating efficient, well-maintained and profitable hotels and on delivering a “Here For You” guest experience.

Our franchising operations

From 2002 through September 30, 2013, our franchise system has grown at a 22% compounded annual growth rate (CAGR).

Our franchising activities include franchising both newly constructed hotels and existing hotels converted to meet our brand standards. La Quinta Inn & Suites represents the next generation standard for La Quinta and has largely been the exclusive focus of franchise growth since 2007. As of September 30, 2013, there were 466 open and operating franchised La Quinta lodging facilities in the United States, Canada and Mexico and an active pipeline of 175 locations, 156 of which were domestic and 19 of which were international.

Franchising sales

As of September 30, 2013, we employed nine franchise sales personnel who market our franchise programs to qualified applicants, two of whom focus exclusively on our international franchise operations. We believe that hotel owners and operators choose to become a franchisee of a lodging brand based primarily on the perceived value and quality of that brand and the franchisor’s services, and the extent to which affiliation with that franchisor may increase the franchisee’s profitability. Because a significant portion of the costs of owning and operating a hotel are generally fixed, increases in revenues generated by affiliation with a franchise lodging chain can improve a hotel’s financial performance. We offer our franchisees our strong brand awareness supported by well-developed infrastructure that includes reservation, national advertising, training and systems related services.

 

122


Table of Contents

Franchising agreements and fees

A prospective franchisee is required to pay us a nonrefundable application fee of $5,000 when an application is made for a La Quinta franchise. We evaluate franchise applicants on the basis of their hotel operating experience and ability, financial resources strength and credit history, among other factors. Upon execution of a franchise agreement, our current form of franchise agreement provides that approved franchise applicants will pay us an initial fee of $50,000 for up to 100 authorized guest rooms, plus $500 per guest room over 100. Historically, we have modified this initial fee to adapt to differing circumstances, such as the size and type of hotel facility, the location of the hotel site, and the experience and creditworthiness of the applicant. During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, the initial fees paid by franchisees ranged from $10,000 to $68,500. Under our current form of franchise agreement, the $5,000 application fee can be used as a credit toward the initial fee. Additionally, a franchisee may expand the number of guest rooms in a hotel with our approval, which requires payment of the then-standard per room initial fee per guest room. A franchisee may also transfer ownership of a hotel with our approval, which may require payment of a transfer fee.

Approved franchise applicants are granted rights (subject to the terms of their franchise agreement) to operate their hotels under the La Quinta Inn & Suites name, to obtain reservations through our central reservation system and to use our hotel designs, operating systems and procedures, among other rights. Our franchise agreements generally restrict our ability to open a new owned or franchised hotel in a limited area near the franchised hotel, which can range from several city blocks in an urban area to several square miles in less populated areas.

Our existing franchise agreements for existing franchised hotels generally require a franchisee to pay a royalty fee of 4.0% of gross room revenues (as defined in the franchise agreement) during the first two years of operating under our brand and 4.5% of gross room revenues for all periods thereafter. Our current form of franchise agreement for newly franchised hotels requires a franchisee to pay a royalty fee of 4.5% of gross room revenues during the first two years of operating under our brand and 5.0% of gross room revenues for all periods thereafter. After the first two years, a franchisee can receive a rebate of 0.5% of gross room revenues if, in any calendar year, the franchised hotel achieves superior results in guest satisfaction as measured and defined by results of surveys conducted by an independent market research firm. However, our current form of franchise agreement for newly franchised international hotels does not include a royalty fee ramp up or rebates for guest satisfaction results. In addition to royalty fees, a franchisee generally pays, as a percentage of gross room revenues, a marketing fund contribution fee of 2.5% for national advertising and other promotional efforts and a reservation fee of 2.0% to support the cost of reservation services provided to the hotels. Franchisees also pay us other fees, such as fees to participate in our online LQConnect intra-net, attend training programs and participate in our La Quinta Returns program. We also provide franchisees the option to purchase revenue management services for their hotel, at fees ranging from $800 to $5,000 per month depending on the size of the hotel and services provided.

Our franchise agreements generally have an initial term of 20 years. We, and the franchisee generally, have a right to terminate the agreement on the tenth and fifteenth anniversary of the opening date of the franchised hotel and, if the hotel was converted from a competing brand, additionally on the fifth such anniversary. The franchisee may also terminate the agreement if the hotel is not meeting predetermined occupancy levels, which may, under certain circumstances, require payment of specified termination fees to us. Additionally, we have the right to terminate a franchise agreement if a franchisee fails to meet our quality standards or

 

123


Table of Contents

fulfill other contractual obligations, which may, under certain circumstances, require payment by the franchisee of specified liquidated damages to us. Since the inception of our franchising program, we have retained nearly 90% of our franchise partners and the majority of the terminations were initiated by us, and, during the twelve months ended September 30, 2013, seven franchise agreements were terminated, and four of such terminations were initiated by us.

Franchising operations support

As of September 30, 2013, the average size of our franchised hotels is approximately 80 rooms. Before a franchised hotel opens, we inspect the hotel to confirm that it meets our quality specifications. Once a franchised hotel opens, we strive to provide continued sales support and operational assistance. Each franchised hotel must adhere to the same rigorous brand standards of design, maintenance and guest service as an owned hotel and is inspected periodically by a franchise service director to assure that the franchised hotel adheres to our brand standards. Competition for franchise agreements, however, may require us to reduce the level of hotel improvements required. As of September 30, 2013, we employed nine franchise service directors to assist franchisees with pre-opening and ongoing business issues.

Financial assistance and incentives to new franchisees

We do not presently have a company-funded financial assistance program for franchisees. However, on occasion we have provided, and at our discretion may occasionally provide in the future, franchisees with various forms of financial incentives upon varying terms, depending upon a number of factors. These factors include: the number of hotels involved and their locations, the number of rooms involved, relevant market conditions and other factors that may warrant providing financial incentives.

Our pipeline

As of September 30, 2013, we had a pipeline of 175 future franchised hotels, representing approximately 14,300 rooms. Each hotel in our pipeline is represented by an executed 20-year franchise agreement. Eighty percent of our pipeline represents new construction and the remaining 20% represents the conversion of an existing hotel into a La Quinta-branded hotel. As of September 30, 2013, approximately 36% of the new construction and conversion has commenced. Although, based on historical experience, converted hotels in our pipeline can generally become operational between 12 to 18 months from the date of execution of the franchise agreement, and newly constructed hotels in our pipeline can generally become operational between 36 to 48 months from the date of execution of the franchise agreement, openings may be delayed, or abandoned, due to economic conditions, weather, construction and permit delays and other factors. Moreover, the commitments of owners and developers with whom we have agreements are subject to numerous conditions, and the eventual development and construction of our pipeline not currently under construction is subject to numerous risks, including, in certain cases, the ability of the franchisee to obtain governmental and regulatory approvals and adequate financing.

The size of our pipeline has remained relatively steady over the past several years. At December 31, 2010, our pipeline numbered 178 hotels and as of September 30, 2013, our pipelined numbered 175 hotels. The size of our pipeline is a function of both the number of new agreements signed and the pace of opening hotels in the pipeline and, accordingly, will fluctuate over time. Moreover, we continually evaluate our pipeline to determine whether to terminate

 

124


Table of Contents

any contracts and/or seek new franchisees in any particular locations. We opened 13% of the hotels in our pipeline as of the end of 2011 in 2012 and 8% of the hotels in our pipeline as of the end of 2012 through September 30, 2013.

Our marketing operation

Brand marketing.    We implement a national marketing strategy by using consumer insight studies and guest feedback. Our strategy to reach and influence our marketplace is shaped by our goals to:

 

 

drive brand awareness and perception that will generate first-time and repeat bookings and loyalty;

 

 

focus communications and media on the most relevant guest segment to increase revenue and penetration over our competitive market segment;

 

 

deliver on our distinctive positioning via break-through advertising;

 

 

create brand differentiation through cutting-edge guest insight and innovation; and

 

 

support and evolve our “Here For You” guest experience.

The La Quinta brand is promoted through national, regional and local marketing. We advertise our brand on television through national cable and spot TV as well as national network radio, on the web through online advertising, search marketing and email campaigns and in print through newspapers and magazines. We also conduct direct marketing to potential and former guests, including La Quinta Returns members. Our marketing is primarily supported through fee contributions, calculated as a percentage of gross room revenues, from our owned and franchised hotels to our marketing programs, including La Quinta Returns and the BMF.

Our international marketing efforts are intended to reinforce general brand awareness while targeting local market needs. With five hotels opened in Mexico, a portion of the fees paid to the BMF by Mexico franchisees will be devoted to a Mexico marketing program.

We have also launched a company-wide military initiative that supports hiring of military veterans, community outreach, franchise growth, sourcing and Returns loyalty program tiers geared towards the military community.

La Quinta returns.    As of September 30, 2013, we had nearly nine million members in our La Quinta Returns loyalty program, 2.4 million of which we consider active members (which generally refers to our loyalty program members who earn or redeem La Quinta Returns points within the previous 18 months). Our La Quinta Returns active members have delivered continued year-over-year increases in room revenues, and generated 47% of room revenues at our owned and franchised hotels for the twelve months ended September 30, 2013. We believe our loyalty program is favored by our members because of:

 

 

rapid accumulation of rewards, including free nights at La Quinta locations, airline miles and credits and gift cards and certificates from national restaurant chains and retailers;

 

 

rapid achievement of Gold and Elite status, after as few as 10 nights in a calendar year; and

 

 

instant Gold status for military personnel and their families.

Our Returns program helps expedite the reservation and check-in process and improves administrative efficiency of our reservation agents and front desk staff by providing a personal

 

125


Table of Contents

profile of each Returns member. This profile includes information such as email and mailing address and preferred method of payment that we use to market directly to Returns members.

Internet & mobile.    We provide guests with the ability to shop and reserve rooms on the Internet through our brand website, www.LQ.com, and through mobile via the LQ Instant Hold platform. Our website provides guests with real-time information through hotel micro-sites that contain Trip Advisor scores, location, descriptions, amenities, special promotions, rates and availability for specific La Quinta hotels. Hotel photographs are prominently displayed on the hotel information pages along with dynamic maps and driving directions, information on nearby attractions and local weather information. Multiple search options are offered, including searches by city, attraction, zip code and trip routing from origin or destination. In addition to our proprietary brand website, we distribute our lodging product via third party travel websites.

The following graph reflects the percentage of our revenue that is attributable to each of our internal and external distribution channels in 2012.

 

LOGO

Our global sales operation

Global & regional sales.    As of September 30, 2013, we employed a direct sales force consisting of approximately 69 members. The direct sales force consists of approximately 33 global sales managers, funded by the BMF, who call on Fortune 500 companies and mid-tier businesses to increase our corporate travel base. These accounts typically have a significant number of travelers in the regions in which we operate and need a high volume of room-nights. Global sales managers also seek to increase room sales through inclusion in approved or preferred lodging lists of corporate travel managers and travel agencies operating on a national basis. We also form and continue to seek alliances with national travel and consumer organizations, such as AAA and AARP, and offer special rates or promotions to such organizations’ guests. In addition to the global effort, approximately 35 of our sales managers, funded by our owned hotels, are based in our regional markets. These regional sales managers call on local businesses, governmental agencies, hospitals and other organizations that can generate room-nights for our hotels.

 

126


Table of Contents

Central reservations and global distribution systems.    We promote and operate our own central reservation system, as well as toll-free numbers to accept reservations. Our reservation system provides reservation agents with information about hotel locations, available rooms and prices in order to assist guests in reserving rooms. Our reservations agents are trained in telephone sales techniques. Through our computer network, we continually update the number of rooms sold at each hotel to maximize the sale of available rooms through either the individual hotel or the reservation center. We market our reservation services to travel agents and corporate travel planners who may make reservations through global airline reservation distribution systems. We also have specialized reservation agents for large group sales, motor coach sales and special service bookings.

Our information systems

In today’s world, technology drives almost every business process. We have created an innovative technology deployment methodology that has enabled a collaborative environment where cross departmental business partners work very closely and effectively with technology teams and third parties to innovate, design and deploy technology-enabled improvements. More than 150 projects have been successfully completed using this methodology over the past 6 years.

We have been systematically moving away from in-house development of technology solutions and instead partnering with the best of breed software-as-a-service providers. We have also moved away from deployment of technology hosted at hotels and moved all key systems like hotel management systems, phone switches, back office, financials and HR functions to Cloud based environments, resulting in a significant reduction in IT operating and maintenance costs. In 2012, La Quinta won the Hospitality Technology Visionary Award “for leveraging technology beyond standard practices to improve overall hotel operations” and realized reductions in operating costs through our Cloud and Software as a Service (SaaS) technology deployment strategy. This also helps lower the start-up investment costs for franchise owners (for example, no capital investment for phone switches at each hotel is necessary).

Our trademarks

All of the intellectual property used for the La Quinta brand is owned by La Quinta Worldwide, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Issuer. “La Quinta,” “La Quinta Inn,” “La Quinta Inn & Suites,” “LQ Instant Hold,” “LQ” and “Returns” are our primary trademarks. Our material trademarks and many secondary marks are registered in various combinations of word and logo marks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for hotel and motel services. In the United States, certain of our marks are subject to an agreement with the owner of a resort known as “La Quinta Resort & Club,” located in La Quinta, California. The agreement, among other things, geographically divides use of the trademark “La Quinta,” granting the resort owner the exclusive right to use the mark “La Quinta” in connection with facilities located within a 37 mile radius of the La Quinta Resort & Club, subject to certain exceptions, and the right to open three more facilities using certain of our marks, subject to certain exceptions, conditions and restrictions. As between the resort owner and us and our affiliates, we and our affiliates have the right to use the trademark in all other areas. The agreement is perpetual in duration.

Certain pending applications by us for registrations of variations of our primary marks, including certain logo forms, have been suspended by the USPTO pending resolution of litigation and related USPTO proceedings brought by us against the owners of a chain of hotels in Mexico

 

127


Table of Contents

called “Quinta Real.” After a trial on the merits in a federal court in Tucson in 2012, Quinta Real was generally prohibited from using the Quinta name to expand into the United States. That decision is on appeal to the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. We anticipate that, regardless of the ultimate outcome of that litigation or the related USPTO proceedings, the pending applications will ultimately proceed to registration.

We have also registered certain of our trademarks for hotel and motel services with the appropriate governmental agencies in certain foreign jurisdictions.

We consider all of these trademarks and the associated name recognition to be important to our business.

Our employees

As a service-oriented business, our employees are important to our success. Recruiting for general managers and corporate employees is coordinated through our corporate human resources department. All owned hotel employees, including hourly employees, receive training through LQUniversity when hired as well as ongoing training to improve their skills. Our online training system provides consistent and effective orientation, training and testing across our brand. Prior to assuming responsibility for a hotel, our general managers participate in a five-week training program that emphasizes operations, hospitality, rate management, legal and risk management issues, interviewing, employee relations, training and budgeting.

We provide all of our full-time employees and their families, including hourly hotel employees, the opportunity to participate in a benefits package, which includes health, dental and vision coverage. We believe these benefits provide a competitive advantage in recruiting hourly hotel employees, as compared to competing select-service hotels. Our salaried employees are also able to earn financial incentives based on achieving targeted goals, such as RevPAR Index, profitability, Net Promoter scores and personal development goals. In addition, recognition programs have been established to acknowledge our employees’ outstanding service and achievement. We believe our scale and size also provide career opportunities for our employees to advance within the organization.

As of September 30, 2013, we employed 8,069 employees. Of these employees, 6,838 were full-time and 1,231 were part-time. Three hundred sixty two were employed as corporate associates and 7,707 were employed at our hotels. Our employees are not currently represented by labor unions and we have never experienced an organized work stoppage. We believe that ongoing labor relations with our employees are good.

Competition

As of September 2013, the U.S. hotel sector comprised approximately 53,000 hotels with more than 4.9 million rooms. Of these rooms, approximately 69% were affiliated with a brand. The hotel industry is highly fragmented, with no one entity controlling a majority of hotel rooms in the U.S.

La Quinta is a select-service hotel brand that competes primarily against other select-service hotels in both the upper-midscale and the midscale segments, and we consider our main STR competitive set to be Comfort, Holiday Inn Express and Hampton. However, our owned and franchised hotels generally operate in markets that contain numerous competitors, including a wide range of lodging facilities offering full-service, select-service and all-suite lodging options.

 

128


Table of Contents

Hotels in other market segments, such as full-service hotels, may lower their rates to a level comparable to those of select-service hotels such as ours that, in turn, may further increase competitive pressure in our markets. Our owned and franchised hotels generally compete for guests on the basis of room rates, quality of accommodations, name recognition, service levels, convenience of locations and reward program offerings. Additionally, an increasing supply of hotel rooms in La Quinta’s market segment, and consolidations in the lodging industry generally, have resulted in the creation of several large, multi-branded hotel chains with diversified operations and greater marketing and financial resources than we have, which has increased competition for guests in the markets in which our owned and franchised hotels operate.

We compete for franchise agreements based primarily on brand name recognition and reputation, the room rate that can be realized, royalty fees charged and other contract terms. Some of our competitors may have substantially greater marketing and financial resources, greater brand distribution and awareness and/or greater financial incentives than we do. Other competitive factors for franchise agreements include relationships with hotel owners and investors, including institutional owners of multiple hotels, availability and affordability of financing, marketing support, reservation and e-commerce system capacity and efficiency and the ability to make investments that may be necessary to obtain franchise agreements. The terms of our franchise agreements for each of our franchised hotels are also influenced by contract terms offered by our competitors, among other things. As a result, the terms of new franchise agreements may not be as favorable as our existing franchise agreements. For example, competition may require us to reduce or change fee structures, make greater use of key money or provide other financial incentives such as loans and guarantees to franchisees and/or reduce the level of hotel improvements required to conform to brand standards. In addition, if the availability of suitable locations for new hotels decreases, planning or other local regulations change or the availability or affordability of financing is limited, the supply of suitable hotels for franchising could be diminished. Additionally, an excess supply of hotel rooms or unfavorable borrowing conditions may discourage potential franchisees from expanding or constructing new hotels, thereby limiting a source of growth of the franchise fees received by us. Our franchise agreements generally restrict our ability to open a new owned or franchised hotel in a limited area near the franchised hotel, which can range from several city blocks in an urban area to several square miles in less populated areas. If the hotels that we franchise perform less successfully than those of our competitors, if we are unable to offer terms as favorable as those offered by our competitors, or if the availability of suitable hotels is limited, our ability to compete effectively for new franchise agreements could be reduced.

We believe we compete effectively, and our competitive position is protected due to our strong brand, owner, operator and franchisor business model and experienced management team.

Environmental matters

We are subject to certain requirements and potential liabilities under various foreign, federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, and incur costs in complying with such requirements. These laws and regulations govern actions including air emissions, the use, storage and disposal of hazardous and toxic substances, and wastewater disposal. In addition to investigation and remediation liabilities that could arise under such laws, we may also face personal injury, property damage or other claims by third parties concerning environmental compliance or contamination. We use and store hazardous and toxic substances, such as cleaning materials, pool chemicals, heating oil and fuel for back-up generators at some of

 

129


Table of Contents

our facilities, and we generate certain wastes in connection with our operations. Some of our hotels include older buildings, and some may have, or may historically have had, dry-cleaning facilities and underground storage tanks for heating oil and back-up generators. We have from time to time been responsible for investigating and remediating contamination at some of our facilities, such as contamination that has been discovered when we have removed underground storage tanks, and we could be held responsible for any contamination resulting from the disposal of wastes that we generate, including at locations where such wastes have been sent for disposal. Some laws may regard us as having liability as an operator by virtue of how we may implement our franchise agreements, rendering us potentially responsible for addressing environmental or other conditions existing at our franchised hotels. In some cases, we may be entitled to indemnification from the party that caused the contamination, or pursuant to our franchise agreements, but there can be no assurance that we would be able to recover all or any costs we incur in addressing such problems. From time to time, we may be required to manage, abate, remove or contain mold, lead, asbestos-containing materials, radon gas or other hazardous conditions found in or on our hotels. We have implemented an on-going operations and maintenance plan at each of our owned hotels that seeks to identify and remediate these conditions as appropriate. Although we have incurred, and expect that we will continue to incur, costs relating to the investigation, identification and remediation of hazardous materials known or discovered to exist at our hotels, those costs have not had, and are not expected to have, a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.

Regulation

The hotel industry is subject to extensive federal, state and local governmental regulations in the United States and the other countries in which our owned and franchised hotels operate, including those relating to building and zoning requirements and those relating to the preparation and sale of food. Hotels and their owners and operators are also subject to licensing and regulation by state and local departments relating to health, sanitation, fire and safety standards, and to laws governing their relationships with employees, including minimum wage requirements, overtime, working conditions and citizenship requirements. In connection with the continued operation or remodeling of certain of our hotels, we or our franchisees may be required to expend funds to meet federal, state and local regulations. Any failure to obtain or maintain any such licenses or any publicity resulting from actual or alleged violations of any such laws and regulations could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Our franchisees are responsible for compliance with all laws and government regulations applicable to the hotels they own and operate. We believe that our businesses are conducted in substantial compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

The Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”), various states and certain other foreign jurisdictions (including Canada and Mexico) regulate the sale of franchises. The FTC and the foreign jurisdictions require franchisors to make extensive disclosure to prospective franchisees but do not require registration of the franchise offer. A number of U.S. states in which we offer franchises require both registration and disclosure in connection with franchise offers and sales. In addition, several states have “franchise relationship laws” that limit the ability of the franchisor to terminate franchise agreements or to withhold consent to the renewal or transfer of these agreements. While our franchising operations have not been materially adversely affected by such regulations, we cannot predict the effect of future regulation or legislation.

 

130


Table of Contents

Legal proceedings

We are a party to a number of pending claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business, including proceedings involving tort and other general liability claims, workers’ compensation and other employee claims and intellectual property claims.

In one matter, Brey Corp. v. LQ Management L.L.C., the plaintiff claims that he received two unsolicited faxes that advertised rates for three different La Quinta hotels and that these faxes violate the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. We participated in mediation on August 21, 2013, and our offer to settle the matter was rejected by the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s motion for class certification has been denied. The plaintiff has until February 13, 2014 to seek an appeal. It is impossible to determine with certainty the ultimate outcome of this proceeding.

We maintain general and other liability insurance; however, certain costs of defending lawsuits, such as those below the insurance deductible amount, are not covered by or are only partially covered by insurance policies, and our insurance carriers could refuse to cover certain claims in whole or in part. We regularly evaluate our ultimate liability costs with respect to such claims and lawsuits. We accrue costs from litigation as they become probable and estimable.

We do not consider our ultimate liability with respect to any single claim or lawsuit, including the Brey proceeding, or the aggregate of such claims and lawsuits, to be material in relation to our combined financial condition, results of operations, or our cash flows taken as a whole.

 

131


Table of Contents

Management

Executive officers and directors

The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of our executive officers and directors as of the date of this prospectus. We expect that the director nominees listed below will be elected to our board of directors prior to the completion of this offering. In addition, prior to completion of this offering, we expect to elect an additional director designated by Blackstone and a Blackstone designee will act as chairperson of our board of directors.

 

Name    Age      Position(s)

 

Wayne B. Goldberg

     53       Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

Keith A. Cline

     44       Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Rajiv K. Trivedi

     51       Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer

Angelo J. Lombardi

     42       Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Mark M. Chloupek

     42       Executive Vice President and General Counsel

Julie M. Cary

     48       Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer

James H. Forson

     46       Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

Glenn Alba

     42       Director

Alan J. Bowers

     59       Director Nominee

Henry G. Cisneros

     66       Director Nominee

Michael Nash

     52       Director Nominee

Mitesh B. Shah

     44       Director Nominee

William J. Stein

     51       Director

Gary M. Sumers

     61       Director Nominee

 

Wayne B. Goldberg

Wayne B. Goldberg has served on the boards of directors of certain of our Predecessor Entities since 2006 and on our board of directors since 2013. In addition, Mr. Goldberg has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since 2006. Mr. Goldberg joined us in 2000 as Group Vice President of Operations and served the positions of Senior Vice President of Operations and Executive Vice President of Operations. Prior to joining La Quinta, Mr. Goldberg was Chief Operating Officer for BridgeStreet Accommodations, a worldwide corporate housing provider, from January 2000 to June 2000. Prior to BridgeStreet, Mr. Goldberg served in various roles at Red Roof Inns, Inc. from 1979 to 1999, including Group Vice President, District Vice President, Regional Manager, Area Manager and General Manager. Mr. Goldberg currently serves as a director for the Texas (FFA) Future Farmers of America Foundation. Mr. Goldberg graduated from the University of Louisville with a B.A. in communications/business organizations.

Keith A. Cline

Keith A. Cline has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 2013. From 2011 to 2013, prior to joining us, Mr. Cline was Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer at Charming Charlie, Inc. and, from 2006 to 2011, Mr. Cline was Senior Vice President of Finance at Express, Inc. Mr. Cline began his career at Arthur Anderson & Company and held financial leadership roles at The J.M. Smucker Company, FedEx Custom Critical and Limited Brands. Mr. Cline is a summa cum laude graduate of the University of Akron with a B.S. in Accounting and a M.B.A. in Finance.

 

132


Table of Contents

Rajiv K. Trivedi

Rajiv K. Trivedi joined La Quinta in 2000 and has served as Executive Vice President since 2006 and as Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer since 2009. Prior to joining us, from 1992 to 2000, Mr. Trivedi served as Vice President of Franchise Operations at Cendant Corporation and in a variety of key management roles in the hotel industry, including Cendant Corporation. Mr. Trivedi is active in numerous civic and industry organizations including the Asian American Hotel Owners Association (AAHOA). Mr. Trivedi graduated from the Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda with an M.S. in Math and Business.

Angelo J. Lombardi

Angelo J. Lombardi joined La Quinta in 2001 as Vice President Revenue Management and has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since 2006. Prior to joining La Quinta, from 1989 to 2000, Mr. Lombardi held several positions at Red Roof Inns, Inc., including General Manager, Director of Revenue Management and Vice President Operations.

Mark M. Chloupek

Mark M. Chloupek joined La Quinta as Executive Vice President and General Counsel in 2006. Prior to joining us, from 1999 through 2006, Mr. Chloupek served as Vice President and Senior Vice President and Chief Counsel of Operations for Wyndham International, Inc. Prior to joining Wyndham, from 1996 to 1999, Mr. Chloupek worked for Locke Lord LLP (formerly Locke Purrell Rain Harrell—a professional corporation), a Dallas-based law firm. Additionally, Mr. Chloupek served on the Boards of Directors for the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation and The Texas General Counsel Forum. Mr. Chloupek received a B.A. in economics from the College of William and Mary where he graduated Phi Beta Kappa and summa cum laude and received a J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law.

Julie M. Cary

Julie M. Cary joined La Quinta in 2006 as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer. Prior to joining La Quinta, from 2004 to 2006, Ms. Cary served as Vice President at Brinker International, as Vice President of Marketing at Dean Foods from 2003 to 2004, as Senior Manager of Marketing until promoted to Vice President of Marketing at Gerber Products Company from 1998 to 2003 and as Assistant Brand Manager until promoted to Brand Manager at Ralston Purina from 1991 to 1997. Ms. Cary holds an M.B.A. from Washington University and a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Illinois.

James H. Forson

James H. Forson has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since 2012. Prior to that role, Mr. Forson was Vice President and Controller from 2010, when he joined La Quinta, to 2012 and also served as Acting Chief Financial Officer from 2012 to 2013. Prior to joining La Quinta, Mr. Forson was Audit Senior Manager with Grant Thornton LLP from 2006 through 2010. Mr. Forson graduated from the University of Virginia’s McIntire School of Commerce with a B.S. degree in Commerce with distinction, and is a Certified Public Accountant in Texas.

Glenn Alba

Glenn Alba has served on the boards of directors of certain of our Predecessor Entities since 2006 and on our board of directors since 2013. Mr. Alba is a Managing Director in the Real Estate Group of Blackstone based in New York. Since joining Blackstone in 1997, Mr. Alba has been

 

133


Table of Contents

involved in the asset management of a broad range of Blackstone’s real estate investments in the US and Europe including office, hotel, multi-family and industrial assets. While based in the London office from 2001 to 2004, Mr. Alba managed a diverse set of assets in London, Paris and other cities in France as well as portfolio investments across Germany. More recently, Mr. Alba has been primarily involved in the hotel sector with management responsibility for various full-service and limited service hotels in the LXR Luxury Resorts portfolio and in us as well as global portfolio management duties. Mr. Alba received a B.S. in Accounting from Villanova University. Mr. Alba currently serves as a member of the Doubletree Hotels Owner Advisory Council and the Villanova University Real Estate Advisory Council.

Alan J. Bowers

Alan J. Bowers has served on the boards of directors of certain of our Predecessor Entities since 2013 and is expected to be a member of our board of directors prior to consummation of this offering. Mr. Bowers most recently served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a board member of Cape Success, LLC from 2001 to 2004 and of Marketsource Corporation from 2000 to 2001. From 1995 to 1999, Mr. Bowers served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a board member of MBL Life Assurance Corporation. Mr. Bowers held various positions, including Audit and Area Managing Partner, at Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P. where he worked from 1978 to 1995 and also worked at Laventhol & Horwath, CPAs from 1976 to 1978. Mr. Bowers also serves on the boards of directors of Walker & Dunlop, Inc., American Achievement Corp. and Quadel Consulting, Inc. Mr. Bowers holds a B.S. in Accounting, from Montclair State University and an M.B.A., Finance and Economics, from St. John’s University and is a Certified Public Accountant in New Jersey.

Henry G. Cisneros

Henry G. Cisneros has served on the boards of directors of certain of our Predecessor Entities since 2013 and is expected to be a member of our board of directors prior to consummation of this offering. Mr. Cisneros currently serves as Chairman of the CityView companies, which he joined in 2003. Mr. Cisneros served as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development from 1992 to 1997 and, prior to that, Mr. Cisneros served four terms as Mayor of San Antonio, Texas. Mr. Cisneros has served as President of the National League of Cities, as Deputy Chair of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and is currently an officer of Habitat for Humanity International. Mr. Cisneros is also currently Chairman of the San Antonio Economic Development Foundation and a member of the advisory boards of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Broad Foundation. Mr. Cisneros holds a Bachelor of Arts and a Master’s degree in Urban and Regional Planning from Texas A&M University. Mr. Cisneros also holds a Master’s degree in Public Administration from Harvard University and a Doctorate in Public Administration from George Washington University.

Michael Nash

Michael Nash is expected to be a member of our board of directors prior to consummation of this offering. Mr. Nash is a Senior Managing Director in the Real Estate Group of Blackstone and the Chief Investment Officer of Blackstone Real Estate Debt Strategies, each based in New York. He is also a member of the Real Estate Investment Committee for both Blackstone Real Estate Debt Strategies and Blackstone Real Estate Advisors. Prior to joining Blackstone, Mr. Nash was with Merrill Lynch from 1997 to 2007 where he led the firm’s Real Estate Principal Investment Group - Americas. Mr. Nash also serves as the executive chairman of the board of directors of Blackstone

 

134


Table of Contents

Mortgage Trust Inc. Mr. Nash received a B.S. in Accounting from State University of New York at Albany, as well as an M.B.A. in Finance from the Stern School of Business at New York University.

Mitesh B. Shah

Mitesh B. Shah has served on the boards of directors of certain of our Predecessor Entities since 2013 and is expected to be a member of our board of directors prior to consummation of this offering. Mr. Shah currently serves as Chief Executive Officer and Senior Managing Principal of Noble Investment Group, which he founded in 1993 and which specializes in making opportunistic investments in the lodging and hospitality real estate sector. Mr. Shah currently serves as president of the Marriott International North America franchise board, is a member of the owner and franchise board for Hyatt Hotels Corporation and is a member of the Industry Real Estate Finance Advisory Council of the American Hotel and Lodging Association. Mr. Shah also serves as Vice Chairman and executive committee member of the Board of Trustees of Wake Forest University, where he chairs the audit, compliance and risk committee and the nominating committee and is a member of the compensation committee and the Medical Center board. In addition, he is an executive committee member of Woodward Academy’s governing board and a trustee of the University System of Georgia Foundation. Mr. Shah holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from Wake Forest University.

William J. Stein

William J. Stein has served on the boards of directors of certain of our Predecessor Entities since 2006 and on our board of directors since 2013. Mr. Stein is a senior managing director and global head of asset management in Blackstone’s real estate group. Since joining Blackstone in 1997, Mr. Stein has been involved in the direct asset management and asset management oversight of Blackstone’s global real estate assets. Before joining Blackstone, Mr. Stein was a Vice President at Heitman Real Estate Advisors and JMB Realty Corp. Mr. Stein currently serves as a board member of Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Brixmor Property Group Inc. Mr. Stein received a B.B.A. from the University of Michigan and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago.

Gary M. Sumers

Gary M. Sumers is expected to be a member of our board of directors prior to consummation of this offering. Mr. Sumers is a Senior Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer in the Real Estate Group of Blackstone. Since joining Blackstone in 1995, Mr. Sumers’ activities have included heading Blackstone Real Estate Advisors’ (BREA) Strategic Asset Management Group, oversight of all financial reporting activities and responsibility for the property disposition activities. From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Sumers was Chief Operating Officer of General Growth Properties, a publicly traded regional mall REIT. Mr. Sumers also serves on the Washington University board of trustees. Mr. Sumers received an A.B. from Washington University in St. Louis, received his law degree from Northwestern University and attended the London School of Economics.

Our corporate governance

We have structured our corporate governance in a manner we believe closely aligns our interests with those of our stockholders. Notable features of our corporate governance include:

 

 

Blackstone has advised us that, when it ceases to own         % of our common stock, it will ensure that its employees will no longer constitute a majority of our board of directors;

 

135


Table of Contents
 

our board of directors is not classified and each of our directors is subject to re-election annually;

 

 

under our amended and restated bylaws and our corporate governance guidelines, directors (other than directors designated pursuant to our stockholders’ agreement) who fail to receive a majority of the votes cast in uncontested elections will be required to submit their resignation to our board of directors;

 

 

we will have a fully independent audit committee and independent director representation on our compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees immediately at the time of the offering, and our independent directors will meet regularly in executive sessions without the presence of our corporate officers or non-independent directors;

 

 

we anticipate that at least one of our directors will qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC;

 

 

we do not have a stockholder rights plan, and if our board of directors were ever to adopt a stockholder rights plan in the future without prior stockholder approval, our board of directors would either submit the plan to stockholders for ratification or cause the rights plan to expire within one year; and

 

 

we will implement a range of other corporate governance best practices, including placing limits on the number of directorships held by our directors to prevent “overboarding” and implementing a robust director education program.

Composition of the board of directors after this offering

Upon completion of this offering, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws will provide that our board of directors will consist of such number of directors as may from time to time be fixed by our board of directors. So long as Blackstone continues to beneficially own at least         % of the total shares of our common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of our directors as of the record date of such meeting, we will agree to nominate individuals designated by Blackstone for election as directors as specified in our stockholders’ agreement and Blackstone must consent to any change to the number of our directors. Each director will serve until our next annual meeting and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualifies or until the director’s earlier death, resignation or removal. For a description of Blackstone’s right to require us to nominate its designees to our board of directors, see “Certain relationships and related party transactions—Stockholders’ agreement.”

Background and experience of directors

When considering whether directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes or skills, taken as a whole, to enable our board of directors to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of our business and structure, our board of directors focused primarily on each person’s background and experience as reflected in the information discussed in each of the directors’ individual biographies set forth above. We believe that our directors provide an appropriate mix of experience and skills relevant to the size and nature of our business. In particular, the members of our board of directors considered the following important characteristics, among others:

 

 

Mr. Alba—his affiliation with Blackstone, his significant experience in working with companies controlled by private equity sponsors, particularly in the real estate industry, his experience in

 

136


Table of Contents
 

working with the management of various other companies owned by Blackstone’s funds, including in the hospitality industry, his experience with real estate investing and his extensive financial background.

 

 

Mr. Bowers—his experience in accounting and executive management, including his substantial experience on the audit committees of private and public companies alike.

 

 

Mr. Cisneros—his significant experience in the housing and homebuilding industries and his background in executive management.

 

 

Mr. Goldberg—his experience as an executive in the hospitality industry, particularly in the select service segment. Furthermore, we also considered how his additional role as our President and Chief Executive Officer would bring management perspective to board deliberations and provide valuable information about the status of our day-to-day operations.

 

 

Mr. Nash—his affiliation with Blackstone, his significant experience in real estate investing, his role as chairman of Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. and his extensive financial advisory background.

 

 

Mr. Shah—his experience with investing in the lodging and hospitality real estate sector and his significant experience in the hospitality industry, including with respect to franchising.

 

 

Mr. Stein—his 16-year tenure with Blackstone involving the direct asset management and asset management oversight of Blackstone’s global real estate assets, his extensive financial background and experience as an asset manager focusing on real estate and hospitality investments.

 

 

Mr. Sumers—his affiliation with Blackstone, including as chief operating officer in the real estate group, his significant experience in asset management, particularly in the real estate industry, and his extensive financial background.

Controlled company exception

After the completion of this offering, Blackstone will continue to beneficially own shares representing more than 50% of the voting power of our shares eligible to vote in the election of directors. As a result, we will be a “controlled company” within the meaning of                 ’s corporate governance standards. Under these corporate governance standards, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance standards, including the requirements (1) that a majority of our board of directors consist of independent directors, (2) that our board of directors have a compensation committee that is comprised entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities and (3) that our board of directors have a nominating and corporate governance committee that is comprised entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities. For at least some period following this offering, we intend to utilize these exemptions. As a result, although we will have a fully independent audit committee upon closing this offering, immediately following this offering, we do not expect the majority of our directors will be independent or that our compensation committee or nominating committee will be comprised entirely of independent directors. Accordingly, you will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that

 

137


Table of Contents

are subject to all of these corporate governance requirements. In the event that we cease to be a “controlled company” and our shares continue to be listed on                 , we will be required to comply with these provisions within the applicable transition periods.

Committees of the board of directors

We anticipate that, prior to the completion of this offering, our board of directors will establish an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee, each of which will have the composition and responsibilities described below. Our board of directors intend to adopt written charters for the committees that comply with current federal law and applicable                 rules relating to corporate governance matters, which will be available on our website upon completion of this offering. Our board of directors may also establish from time to time any other committees that it deems necessary or desirable.

Audit committee

Upon completion of this offering, we expect our audit committee will consist of                 ,                 , and                 , with                 serving as chair.                 ,                 and                 qualify as                 independent directors under governance standards and the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. The audit committee has oversight responsibilities regarding:

 

 

the adequacy and integrity of our financial statements and our financial reporting and disclosure practices;

 

 

the soundness of our system of internal controls regarding finance and accounting compliance;

 

 

the annual independent audit of our combined financial statements;

 

 

the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence;

 

 

the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm;

 

 

the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm;

 

 

our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements in connection with the foregoing; and

 

 

compliance with our Code of Business Conduct.

The audit committee shall also prepare the report of the committee required by the rules and regulations of the SEC to be included in our annual proxy statement.

Compensation committee

Upon completion of this offering, we expect our compensation committee will consist of                 ,                 and                 , with                 serving as chair. The compensation committee is authorized to discharge the board’s responsibilities relating to:

 

 

the establishment, maintenance and administration of compensation and benefit policies designed to attract, motivate and retain personnel with the requisite skills and abilities to contribute to the long term success of the Company;

 

 

the goals, objectives and compensation of our President and Chief Executive Officer, including evaluating the performance of the President and Chief Executive Officer in light of those goals;

 

138


Table of Contents
 

the compensation of our other executives and non-management directors;

 

 

our compliance with the compensation rules, regulations and guidelines promulgated by                 , the SEC and other law, as applicable; and

 

 

the issuance of an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in our annual proxy statement, once required.

Nominating and corporate governance committee

Upon completion of this offering, we expect our nominating and corporate governance committee will consist of                 ,                 and                 , with                 serving as chair. The nominating and corporate governance committee is authorized to:

 

 

advise the board concerning the appropriate composition of the board and its committees;

 

 

identify individuals qualified to become board members;

 

 

recommend to the board the persons to be nominated by the board for election as directors at any meeting of stockholders;

 

 

recommend to the board the members of the board to serve on the various committees of the board;

 

 

develop and recommend to the board a set of corporate governance guidelines and assist the board in complying with them; and

 

 

oversee the evaluation of the board, the board’s committees and management.

Compensation committee interlocks and insider participation

None of the members of our compensation committee has at any time been one of our executive officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last completed fiscal year, on the compensation committee or board of directors of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our board of directors or compensation committee.

Code of ethics

We will adopt a Code of Business Conduct that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, which will be available on our website upon the completion of this offering. Our Code of Business Conduct is a “code of ethics,” as defined in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K. Please note that our Internet website address is provided as an inactive textual reference only. We will make any legally required disclosures regarding amendments to, or waivers of, provisions of our code of ethics on our Internet website.

Executive compensation

Since 2006, our Sponsor (the “Compensation Manager”), as the manager of LQ Management L.L.C., one of the Predecessor Entities, has administered our compensation and benefit policies. We anticipate that, prior to the completion of this offering, our board of directors will establish a compensation committee that will be responsible for establishing, maintaining and administering compensation and benefit policies.

 

139


Table of Contents

As used in this “Executive compensation” section, the terms “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company,” with respect to historical matters, refer to the Predecessor Entities and, with respect to future matters, refer to La Quinta Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries after giving effect to the Pre-IPO Transactions. In addition, as used in this “Executive compensation” section, the term “Compensation Adjusted EBITDA” when used to describe the financial performance measure for the annual bonus awards means Adjusted EBITDA (as described under “Summary historical combined financial data”), as further adjusted for unusual expenses as determined by the Compensation Manager.

Summary compensation table

The following table sets forth all compensation paid to or accrued by our principal executive officer and our two other most highly compensated persons serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2012 for services rendered during 2012. We refer to these executives as our “named executive officers.”

 

Name and principal position    Salary
($)
     Bonus
($)(1)
    

Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation

($)(2)

     All other
compensation
($)(3)
     Total
($)
 

 

 

Wayne B. Goldberg

President and Chief Executive Officer

     500,000         1,747,911         900,000         14,352         3,162,263   

Rajiv K. Trivedi

Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer

     325,000         455,705         438,750         25,811         1,245,266   

Angelo J. Lombardi

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

     325,000         436,978         438,750         14,038         1,214,766   

 

 

 

(1)   Amounts in this column represent discretionary cash bonuses paid in respect of management’s services in 2012 and described under “Narrative disclosure to summary compensation table—2012 bonus compensation.”

 

(2)   Amounts in this column represent the amounts earned under the annual bonus plan described under “Narrative disclosure to summary compensation table—2012 bonus compensation.”

 

(3)   All other compensation for 2012 includes for each named executive officer: employer-paid life and disability insurance; the employer’s 401(k) matching contributions; and the employer-paid executive physical. Mr. Trivedi’s all other compensation also includes the employer-paid auto allowance for fiscal 2012.

Narrative disclosure to summary compensation table

Employment agreements

Mr. Goldberg

Mr. Goldberg’s employment agreement, dated as of September 30, 2003, as amended as of November 9, 2005 and January 25, 2006, provides that he is to serve as Chief Executive Officer, is eligible to receive a base salary of $500,000, subject to annual adjustments as may be approved (but in no event less than $500,000), and a target bonus of 100% (or such higher amount as may be approved, which, for 2012 and 2013, was 200%) of his base salary. In addition, Mr. Goldberg’s employment agreement provides him with a $1,100 monthly auto allowance, a benefit which he did not take advantage of in 2012 or 2013. The employment agreement provides for an initial three-year employment term that extends automatically for additional one-year periods, unless we or the executive elects not to extend the term. Mr. Goldberg is also entitled to participate in all employee benefit plans, programs and arrangements made available to other executive officers generally.

 

140


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Goldberg’s employment agreement, upon a termination by us without cause, or by Mr. Goldberg for good reason or as a result of death or disability, he is entitled to receive a lump-sum payment equal to three times the sum of his then-current annual base salary and bonus calculated at 100% of his then-current annual base salary for the year of his termination, subject to continued compliance with the restrictive covenants described below. In addition, Mr. Goldberg would be entitled to receive continued healthcare coverage for 12 months following such termination, or until such earlier time that Mr. Goldberg receives comparable coverage. In the event that Mr. Goldberg’s employment is terminated as a result of his death, his spouse and his eligible dependents are entitled to receive continued healthcare coverage for 12 months. Mr. Goldberg’s employment agreement also provides for reimbursement by us on a “grossed up” basis for all taxes incurred in connection with all payments or benefits provided to him upon a change in control that are determined by us to be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, or any similar federal or state excise tax.

Mr. Goldberg’s employment agreement also contains restrictive covenants, including an indefinite covenant not to disclose confidential information, and, during Mr. Goldberg’s employment and for the one-year period following the termination of his employment, covenants related to non-competition (other than a termination by the Company without cause or by Mr. Goldberg for good reason) and non-solicitation of employees of the Company, and a covenant not to disparage the Company.

2012 bonus compensation

In 2012, our named executive officers were awarded a discretionary cash bonus for their contribution to the successful amendment and extension of our long-term debt obligations. This bonus payment is reflected in the “Bonus” column of the “Summary compensation table” above.

In addition to the discretionary bonuses described above, our annual cash incentive compensation plan for the year ended December 31, 2012 compensated and rewarded successful achievement of both short-term financial and non-financial goals that were closely aligned with the long-term goals of the Company. The payout under the 2012 annual incentive program was based on a combination of (1) financial performance of the Company and (2) individual performance. For Mr. Goldberg, each of the financial component and the individual performance component composed 50% of his total award opportunity and, for Messrs. Trivedi and Lombardi, the financial component composed 67% of their total award opportunity and the individual performance component composed 33% of their total award opportunity.

The financial component of each named executive officer’s annual bonus opportunity was based on (1) Compensation Adjusted EBITDA, (2) guest satisfaction and (3) RevPAR Index change. For fiscal 2012, Compensation Adjusted EBITDA composed 70% of the financial component, guest satisfaction composed 15% and RevPAR Index change composed 15%. Each of the three elements of the financial component (Compensation Adjusted EBITDA, guest satisfaction and RevPAR Index change) are independent of one another. The financial component of Mr. Goldberg’s annual bonus opportunity was based on Company-wide goals and, due to the respective divisions in which they work, the financial component of Mr. Trivedi’s annual bonus opportunity was based on goals related to the franchised hotels and the financial component of Mr. Lombardi’s annual bonus opportunity was based on goals related to the owned hotels.

The individual performance component for our named executive officers was based on a variety of individual achievement factors, including actual achievement of individual goals, actual

 

141


Table of Contents

achievement of divisional objectives, the economic environment as a whole as compared to overall and individual results, developed initiatives and lost opportunities.

Each named executive officer’s target annual bonus is expressed as a percentage of his base salary and, for the year ended December 31, 2012, the named executive officers’ target bonus opportunity as a percentage of such executive’s base salary were as follows: for Mr. Goldberg, 200% of his base salary, and for Messrs. Trivedi and Lombardi, 150% of their base salary.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the potential payout percentage under the Compensation Adjusted EBITDA portion of the financial component for Mr. Goldberg was zero if the Company-wide Compensation Adjusted EBITDA was less than $27.5 million below budgeted Company-wide Compensation Adjusted EBITDA; was measured on a linear basis between 35% and 70% if the Company-wide Compensation Adjusted EBITDA achieved was between $27.5 million below budgeted Company-wide Compensation Adjusted EBITDA and budgeted Company-wide Compensation Adjusted EBITDA; and was measured on a linear basis between 70% and 100% if the Company-wide Compensation Adjusted EBITDA achieved was between budgeted Company-wide Compensation Adjusted EBITDA and $7 million above budgeted Company-wide Compensation Adjusted EBITDA.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the payout percentage under the Compensation Adjusted EBITDA portion of the financial component for Mr. Trivedi was measured on a linear basis between 35% and 70% if the franchise hotels’ Compensation Adjusted EBITDA achieved was between 90% and 97% of the budgeted franchised hotels’ Compensation Adjusted EBITDA and on a linear basis between 70% and 100% if the franchise hotels’ Compensation Adjusted EBITDA achieved was between 97% to 100% of the budgeted franchise hotels’ Compensation Adjusted EBITDA.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the potential payout percentage under the Compensation Adjusted EBITDA portion of the financial component for Mr. Lombardi was zero if the owned hotels’ Compensation Adjusted EBITDA was less than $27.5 million below budgeted owned hotels’ Compensation Adjusted EBITDA; was measured on a linear basis between 35% and 70% if the owned hotels’ Compensation Adjusted EBITDA achieved was between $27.5 million below budgeted owned hotels’ Compensation Adjusted EBITDA and budgeted owned hotels’ Compensation Adjusted EBITDA; and was measured on a linear basis between 70% and 100% if the owned hotels’ Compensation Adjusted EBITDA achieved was between budgeted owned hotels’ Compensation Adjusted EBITDA and $7 million above budgeted owned hotels’ Compensation Adjusted EBITDA.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the actual Company Compensation Adjusted EBITDA achieved resulted in a 100% payout under the Compensation Adjusted EBITDA financial component of Mr. Goldberg’s award opportunity. The actual franchised hotels’ Compensation Adjusted EBITDA achieved resulted in a 100% payout under the Compensation Adjusted EBITDA financial component of Mr. Trivedi’s award opportunity. The actual owned hotels’ Compensation Adjusted EBITDA achieved resulted in a 100% payout under the Compensation Adjusted EBITDA financial component of Mr. Lombardi’s award opportunity.

There was no scale for the guest satisfaction or the RevPAR Index change for any of the three named executive officers, and the named executive officers were eligible for payouts under these measures if the stated goals were achieved. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the goals for RevPar Index change were achieved, which resulted in a 100% payout under the RevPar Index change financial component for each named executive officer. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the goals for the guest satisfaction were only met by the franchised hotels, which resulted

 

142


Table of Contents

in a 100% payout under this financial component for Mr. Trivedi. As the guest satisfaction goals on a Company-wide basis and for the owned hotels were not met, no payment was received for this financial component by either Mr. Goldberg or Mr. Lombardi.

The remaining 50% of Mr. Goldberg’s potential total award opportunity and the remaining 33% of Messrs. Lombardi’s and Trivedi’s potential total award opportunity were based on individual achievement factors. As to Mr. Goldberg, the Compensation Manager considered the goals achieved in the Company’s marketing, design and construction, legal, sales, finance, operations, employee relations, technology, revenue management and franchise development departments. For Mr. Trivedi, the Compensation Manager considered the new location openings and franchise agreements executed, increased survey participation at the franchised hotels, communication and reporting improvements, increased brand awareness, assistance in disposing of assets and strategic evaluation of distressed locations and improved product quality. For Mr. Lombardi, the Compensation Manager considered the property revenue achieved, the reduction in turnover of the general managers, increased employee engagement and improved employee satisfaction.

As detailed in the following table, actual amounts paid under the annual bonus plan were calculated by multiplying each named executive officer’s base salary by his target bonus potential, which was then adjusted by an achievement factor based on the combined achievement of the financial component and the individual performance component. Based on the performance achieved, each of the named executive officers earned an annual bonus for 2012 as follows, which amounts are reflected in the “Non-equity incentive plan compensation” column of the “Summary compensation table” above:

 

Name    2012
base salary
     Target bonus as a
percentage of
base salary
     Target bonus
potential
     Combined
achievement
factor as a
percentage
of target
     2012
annual bonus
 

 

 

Wayne B. Goldberg

   $ 500,000         200%       $ 1,000,000         90%       $ 900,000   

Rajiv K. Trivedi

   $ 325,000         150%       $ 487,500         90%       $ 438,750   

Angelo J. Lombardi

   $ 325,000         150%       $ 487,500         90%       $ 438,750   

 

 

Long-term incentive awards

Some of our management employees, including each of our named executive officers, have been granted long-term incentive awards in the form of units (the “Units”) in LQ Services L.L.C. (“LQ Services”), which holds interests in several of the Predecessor Entities, which Units are intended to be treated as “profits interests” for U.S. tax purposes. Units are typically granted by our Chief Executive Officer, in consultation with our Sponsor, to key employees upon hire. Unit levels may also be adjusted to recognize changing job responsibilities.

As a condition to receiving the Units, each named executive officer was required to become party to LQ Services’ amended and restated limited liability company agreement (the “LLC Agreement”). The LLC Agreement generally governs the named executive officers’ rights with respect to their Units. The LLC Agreement also contains restrictive covenants, including an indefinite covenant on confidentiality of information and covenants related to non-solicitation of employees of the Company at all times during the executive’s employment, and for a period ending on the earlier of three years from (A) the executive’s termination for cause or voluntary resignation and (B) a sale, transfer or disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the specified Predecessor Entities which results in distributions being payable to the Unit holders.

 

143


Table of Contents

The Units granted to our named executive officers are designed to promote our interests by providing our management employees with the opportunity to participate in increases in the value of our business, thereby incentivizing them to remain as employees. The amounts available for payment on the Units is determined based on the net amount received by the Sponsor pursuant to a Liquidity Event (as defined below), net of specified debt and return of equity to the Sponsor. In 2012, the calculation of the amounts available for payment on the Units was amended, and the Units allocated to our named executive officers were increased. Under the LLC Agreement, all of the Units are exit-vesting and will vest on the date when there is a sale, transfer or disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of specified Predecessor Entities which results in distributions being payable to the holders of the Units (a “Liquidity Event”), subject to the named executive officer’s continued employment on such date. In addition, if the executive’s employment is terminated without cause or as a result of death or disability, then 20% of the executive’s Units will be deemed to have vested ratably in equal, annual installments over five years, beginning on January 26, 2006, and the executive will be entitled to an amount equal to the value of the executive’s vested Units at the then fair market value. Accordingly, if the executive is terminated without cause or is terminated because of death or disability, then the executive will be vested in, and entitled to, all of their Units at their then fair market value. However, if the executive is terminated for cause or voluntarily resigns prior to a Liquidity Event, all of the executive’s Units will be forfeited. In addition, if within six months of such a termination, a distribution is made under the LLC Agreement, the executive will be deemed fully vested with respect to that distribution, meaning that the distribution would be made as though any unvested Units had not been forfeited.

The following table provides information regarding the outstanding Units of our named executive officers as of December 31, 2013. The value as of December 31, 2013 is based on the value of our business at December 31, 2013.

 

Name   

Number of units as of
December 31, 2013

(#)

   Value of units as of
December 31, 2013
($)

 

Wayne B. Goldberg

     

Rajiv K. Trivedi

     

Angelo J. Lombardi

     

 

The Units are expected to be converted into shares of our common stock in connection with the Pre-IPO Transactions described under “Our pre-IPO transactions and organizational structure.” The following table sets forth the number of shares and value of our common stock and restricted stock that each of our named executive officers is expected to receive in exchange for their Units, assuming that each share of common stock has a value based on the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover of this prospectus.

 

      Common stock received in
exchange for units
    

Unvested restricted stock received

in exchange for units

Name    (#)    ($)      (#)    ($)

 

Wayne B. Goldberg

             

Rajiv K. Trivedi

             

Angelo J. Lombardi

             

 

In addition to the Units described above, each of the named executive officers, as well as other members of management, purchased, directly or indirectly, for cash at fair market value interests

 

144


Table of Contents

in some of the Predecessor Entities, which interests have economic characteristics similar to those of shares of common stock in a corporation and have no vesting schedule. These interests are also expected to be converted to shares of our common stock in connection with the Pre-IPO Transactions and are reflected under “Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management.”

Retirement plan

The Company maintains a tax-qualified 401(k) plan, under which the Company matches each employee’s contributions dollar-for-dollar up to 3% of such employee’s eligible earnings and $0.50 for every $1.00 for the next 2% of the employee’s eligible earnings. The maximum match available under the 401(k) plan is 4% of the employee’s eligible earnings. All matching contributions by us are always fully vested.

Potential payments upon termination or change in control

Upon a Liquidity Event or a termination without cause or as result of death or disability, all of the Units of our named executive officers will fully vest.

Upon a termination, our named executive officers would be entitled to receive payment for their accrued but unused vacation days, and, in the event of death of a named executive officer, the named executive officer will receive benefits from third-party payors under our employer-paid premium life insurance plans. All of our named executive officers are eligible for three times their regular annual eligible wages at death (up to $1,000,000).

In addition to the foregoing, upon a termination without cause, for good reason or as a result of death or disability, Mr. Goldberg’s employment agreement provides for cash severance benefits and continued healthcare coverage. See “Narrative disclosure to summary compensation table—Employment agreements.” If Mr. Goldberg had been terminated without cause, for good reason or as a result of death or disability on December 31, 2012, he would have been entitled to receive $3,000,000 in severance and approximately $22,055 in continued healthcare coverage based on 2013 rates. In the event of a change in control, Mr. Goldberg’s employment agreement also provides for the Company’s reimbursement of taxes on a “grossed up” basis.

Compensation of directors

There were no individuals who were not our employees or affiliated with our Sponsor who served as directors of certain of the Predecessor Entities for the year ended December 31, 2012. Our employee directors and Sponsor-affiliated directors receive no additional compensation for serving on the board of directors or committees thereof. We anticipate that each outside director (other than the directors employed by our Sponsor) will be entitled to compensation arrangements to be determined.

Omnibus incentive plan

In connection with this offering, we intend to adopt a new omnibus incentive plan pursuant to which a total of                 shares of our common stock will be reserved for issuance. We expect to grant equity awards to our named executive officers under the new equity incentive plan from time to time, but we have not determined at the current time, the schedule or amount of such grants.

 

145


Table of Contents

Certain relationships and related party transactions

Stockholders’ agreement

In connection with this offering, we intend to enter into a stockholders’ agreement with Blackstone. This agreement will require us to nominate a number of individuals designated by Blackstone for election as our directors at any meeting of our stockholders, each a “Sponsor Director,” such that, upon the election of each such individual, and each other individual nominated by or at the direction of our board of directors or a duly-authorized committee of the board, as a director of our Company, the number of Sponsor Directors serving as directors of our Company will be equal to: (1) if Blackstone continues to beneficially own at least       % of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of our directors as of the record date for such meeting, the lowest whole number that is greater than       % of the total number of directors comprising our board of directors; (2) if Blackstone continues to beneficially own at least       % (but less than       %) of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of our directors as of the record date for such meeting, the lowest whole number that is at least       % of the total number of directors comprising our board of directors; (3) if Blackstone continues to beneficially own at least       % (but less than       %) of the total shares of our common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of our directors as of the record date for such meeting, the lowest whole number that is at least       % of the total number of directors comprising our board of directors; (4) if Blackstone continues to beneficially own at least       % (but less than       %) of the total shares of our common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of our directors as of the record date for such meeting, the lowest whole number that is at least       % of the total number of directors comprising our board of directors; and (5) if Blackstone continues to beneficially own at least       % (but less than       %) of the total shares of our common stock entitled to vote generally in the election of our directors as of the record date for such meeting, the lowest whole number that is at least       % of the total number of directors comprising our board of directors. For so long as the stockholders’ agreement remains in effect, Sponsor Directors may be removed only with the consent of Blackstone. In the case of a vacancy on our board created by the removal or resignation of a Sponsor Director, the stockholders’ agreement will require us to nominate an individual designated by our Sponsor for election to fill the vacancy.

The stockholders’ agreement will remain in effect until our Sponsor is no longer entitled to nominate a Sponsor Director pursuant to the stockholders’ agreement, unless our Sponsor requests that it terminate at an earlier date.

Registration rights agreement

In connection with this offering, we intend to enter into a registration rights agreement that will provide Blackstone an unlimited number of “demand” registrations and customary “piggyback” registration rights. The registration rights agreement also provides that we will pay certain expenses relating to such registrations and indemnify the registration rights holders against (or make contributions in respect of) certain liabilities which may arise under the Securities Act.

 

146


Table of Contents

Indemnification agreements

We intend to enter into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers. These agreements will require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to us, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors or executive officers, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy and is therefore unenforceable.

There is currently no pending material litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is sought.

Products and services

Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., or Alliant, which had been owned by Blackstone until 2012, provides us certain broker service, claims support services, risk management support and other services. In consideration for Alliant’s services, our payments to Alliant totaled $0.2 million, $0.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

Entities affiliated with Travelport, LP, or Travelport, in which certain Blackstone entities have an interest, provide computerized reservations and ticketing and other services to travel agencies and others in the travel industry. We are party to a master services agreement with Travelport whereby we agree to pay specified fees per hotel booking and to purchase certain advertising services. Our payments for services from Travelport totaled $2.1 million, $2.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

Other

See Note 13 in the Notes to Combined Financial Statements of the Predecessor Entities included elsewhere in this prospectus for information regarding the management agreements between the Predecessor Entities and the owners of the Previously Managed Portfolio.

Statement of policy regarding transactions with related persons

Prior to the completion of this offering, our board of directors will adopt a written statement of policy regarding transactions with related persons, which we refer to as our “related person policy.” Our related person policy requires that a “related person” (as defined as in paragraph (a) of Item 404 of Regulation S-K) must promptly disclose to our General Counsel any “related person transaction” (defined as any transaction that is anticipated would be reportable by us under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest) and all material facts with respect thereto. The General Counsel will then promptly communicate that information to our board of directors. No related person transaction will be executed without the approval or ratification of our board of directors or a duly authorized committee of our board of directors. It is our policy that directors interested in a related person transaction will recuse themselves from any vote on a related person transaction in which they have an interest.

 

147


Table of Contents

Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management

The following table and accompanying footnotes set forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock by (1) each person known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, (2) each of our directors, director nominees and named executive officers and (3) all of our directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC.

Unless otherwise provided, the address of each individual listed below is c/o La Quinta Holdings Inc., 909 Hidden Ridge, Suite 600, Irving, Texas 75038.

 

      Number of
shares
beneficially
owned
   Percentage of shares
beneficially owned
Name of beneficial owner       Prior to this
offering
   After this
offering

 

Blackstone(1)

        

Wayne B. Goldberg

        

Keith A. Cline

        

Rajiv K. Trivedi

        

Angelo J. Lombardi

        

Mark M. Chloupek

        

Julie M. Cary

        

James H. Forson

        

Glenn Alba(2)

        

Alan J. Bowers

        

Henry G. Cisneros

        

Michael Nash(2)

        

Mitesh B. Shah

        

William J. Stein(2)

        

Gary M. Sumers(2)

        

Directors and executive officers as a group (17 persons)

        

 

 

(1)   Reflects                 shares of our common stock beneficially owned by investment funds indirectly controlled by The Blackstone Group L.P. The general partner of The Blackstone Group L.P. is Blackstone Group Management L.L.C. Blackstone Group Management L.L.C. is wholly-owned by Blackstone’s senior managing directors and controlled by its founder, Steven A. Schwarzman. Each of the entities that may be deemed to directly or indirectly control such investment funds (other than such investment funds to the extent of their direct holdings) and Mr. Schwarzman may be deemed to beneficially own such shares directly or indirectly controlled by it or him, but each disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares. The address of each of Mr. Schwarzman and each of the other entities listed in this footnote is c/o The Blackstone Group L.P., 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154.

 

(2)   Messrs. Alba, Nash, Stein and Sumers are each employees of Blackstone, but each disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares beneficially owned by Blackstone.

The foregoing table assumes that the initial public offering price for shares of our common stock to be sold in this offering is $                 per share, which is the midpoint of the range on the front cover of this prospectus. The precise holdings of shares of our common stock by particular existing owners would differ from that presented in the table above if the actual initial public offering price per share differs from the assumed price. If the initial public offering price per share of common stock in this offering is $                , which is the low-point of the range indicated on the front cover of this prospectus, Blackstone would beneficially own                  shares of

 

148


Table of Contents

common stock and its percentage ownership prior to the offering would be                  and after the offering would be                . Conversely, if the initial public offering price per share of common stock in this offering is $                , which is the high-point of the range indicated on the front cover of this prospectus, Blackstone would beneficially own              shares of common stock and its percentage ownership prior to the offering would be                  and after the offering would be            .

 

149


Table of Contents

Description of indebtedness

Holdco I debt

On July 6, 2007, we borrowed $2.40 billion under a mortgage loan agreement (the “Mortgage Loan”) with Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, UBS Real Estate Securities, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A. (“B of A”). In December 2007, a portion of the Mortgage Loan was refinanced with a $50 million senior mezzanine loan, reducing the Mortgage Loan to $2.35 billion.

In July 2007, we entered into five unsecured, mezzanine loans totaling $700 million in aggregate. The senior mezzanine loan described above and the five unsecured, mezzanine loans are collectively referred to herein as the “Mezzanine Loans.”

In July 2010, we agreed to settle one of the Mezzanine Loans for $9.4 million resulting in a net gain on debt extinguishment of approximately $40.5 million.

In July 2011, Blackstone made a contribution of $85 million which we used, along with $30 million of available cash, to settle portions of two of the Mezzanine Loans for $60.2 million and $45.2 million, respectively, resulting in a net gain on debt extinguishment of approximately $9.6 million.

In November 2011, we settled an additional portion of two of the Mezzanine Loans for a total of $23.1 million, resulting in a net gain on debt extinguishment of approximately $1.9 million.

In May 2012, the terms of the Mortgage Loan and the Mezzanine Loans (together, the “Loans”) were amended (“Amendment”). Pursuant to the Amendment, certain interest rate spreads were increased, additional assets were pledged as collateral, cash distributions to certain of our equity holders are prohibited, and we obtained the right, at our option, to one two-year term extension following the original maturity date of July 2012. On May 24, 2012, we exercised the option to extend the maturity date of the Loans for a period of two years to the current maturity date of July 6, 2014.

In connection with the Amendment, Blackstone made a cash contribution to us of approximately $175 million. We used this contribution, along with approximately $101 million of available cash, to (1) make a principal payment of $180 million on the Mortgage Loan, (2) settle a portion of the Mezzanine Loans for approximately $69.8 million, resulting in a gain on early debt extinguishment of approximately $5.2 million, and (3) pay associated closing costs of which (i) $7.7 million was expensed as incurred and is included in other income (loss) in the combined statements of operations, and (ii) $4.0 million related to Mezzanine Loans was treated as loss on extinguishment and is included within gain on extinguishment of debt, net in the combined statements of operations included elsewhere in this prospectus.

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Loans are collateralized by 354 and 355 of our owned hotels, respectively. Concurrently with the closing of the Amendment, a newly created limited liability company (“Franchise Holdco”), was formed which assumed ownership of the net assets of our franchising and other brand-related operations. In connection with the Amendment, 100% of the member interests of Franchise Holdco were pledged as collateral for the Loans. In addition, upon closing of the Amendment, the Lenders were granted a first-priority security interest in the cash assets of the entities owned by Franchise Holdco. The Loans may be prepaid in full without penalty. Subject to certain defined premiums, individual properties may be released as collateral after prepayment of a defined portion of the Loans.

 

150


Table of Contents

In connection with the Amendment, the Mortgage Loan carries interest at LIBOR, with portions subject to a LIBOR floor of 1.0%, plus interest rate spreads ranging from 0.55% to 6.803%, resulting in a weighted average spread of 2.664%, with all interest to be paid currently. In addition, interest for the Mezzanine Loans is subject to a LIBOR floor of 1.0%, plus interest rate spreads ranging from 9.0% to 13.9%, resulting in a weighted average spread of 11.59%. For the Mezzanine Loans, any difference between current LIBOR and the LIBOR floor, as well as the increase in the spreads as a result of the Amendment is deferred until the maturity date of the Mezzanine Loans. Such deferred interest is not to be treated as part of the principal amount of the Mezzanine Loans for calculation of interest or any other purpose, although it is considered debt under the Mezzanine Loans and secured accordingly.

Holdco III debt

In February 2007, certain subsidiaries of Holdco III entered into a $101.3 million mortgage loan (“Olympus Loan”) with B of A. The Olympus Loan was collateralized by eight owned hotels.

Pursuant to the terms of the Olympus Loan, it matured in February 2009; however, we were permitted to extend the maturity date of the Olympus Loan for three successive one-year extensions, at our option. In February 2009, we exercised the first extension option, extending the maturity of the Olympus Loan to February 2010. In February 2010, we exercised the second extension option, extending the maturity to February 2011. In February 2011, we exercised the third option and the Olympus Loan was extended until February 2012. The Olympus Loan required monthly interest payments based upon LIBOR plus a spread of 1.4%.

In June 2009, we extended the maturity date of our existing $250.0 million revolving credit facility (“Revolver”) with B of A and other lenders (“Revolver Lenders”) to June 26, 2010. The Revolver was collateralized by 20 owned hotels.

In June 2010, we obtained a new mortgage loan (“HCIII Loan”) in the amount of $177.9 million which replaced the expiring Revolver, and Blackstone concurrently made a contribution of $34.6 million which was used to release three collateralized properties. As a result, the HCIII Loan was collateralized by 17 owned hotels. Under the terms of the HCIII Loan, we were required to make monthly interest payments at LIBOR with a floor of 1.0% plus 3.5%.

In December 2011, we amended and restated the HCIII Loan. Under the new terms, the Olympus Loan and HCIII Loan were combined into one mortgage loan (“Holdco III Mortgage Loan”) with an outstanding balance of $237.3 million, and the maturity date was extended to June 2013. The Holdco III Mortgage Loan is collateralized by 25 owned hotels.

In connection with the closing of the Holdco III Mortgage Loan in December 2011, we made a principal payment on the Holdco III Mortgage Loan of approximately $7.8 million, paid fees of approximately $1.2 million and wrote off approximately $0.5 million of deferred financing costs, which is included in other income (loss) in the accompanying combined statements of operations. Further, B of A agreed to reduce the principal amount outstanding by approximately $11.9 million. The carrying amount of the Holdco III Mortgage Loan has not been changed as a result of this reduction. The reduction in the amount outstanding is being amortized as a reduction in interest expense through the extended maturity date using a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method.

In June 2013, we exercised our extension option and extended the maturity date of the Holdco III Mortgage Loan to July 2014. Under the terms of the Holdco III Mortgage Loan, we are required

 

151


Table of Contents

to make monthly interest payments at LIBOR with a floor of 1.0% plus a spread of 4.0% through July 2012, and thereafter at LIBOR with a floor of 1.0% plus a spread of 4.5%.

Under the terms of the loans discussed above, we are required to make deposits into certain escrow accounts for the payments of debt service, taxes, insurance, and ground leases, the total of which deposits was $104.8 million as of December 31, 2012.

Interest rate caps

Pursuant to the terms of the Loans and the Holdco III Mortgage Loan, we are required to maintain interest rate caps under certain defined conditions until the maturity date. The effect of the interest rate cap agreements is to limit our maximum interest rate exposure with respect to increases in LIBOR through the maturity date. We have purchased and maintained the required interest rate caps during 2012, 2011, and 2010, and the related gain or loss on these investments is reflected within other income (loss) in the accompanying statements of operations.

As of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the interest rate caps we held are estimated to have no value. Management expects that, should it be necessary, the counter parties will fully perform under the terms of the interest rate cap agreements.

Letters of credit

In April 2010, we obtained two letters of credit through Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. aggregating approximately $9.2 million. In January 2012, the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. agreed to reduce the two letters of credit by $2.0 million, aggregating to $7.2 million. We are required to pay a fee of 2.0% per annum related to these letters of credit, and paid such fees of approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million for years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Refinancing

We intend to refinance our current debt facilities prior to or concurrently with the consummation of this offering, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so on favorable terms or at all.

 

152


Table of Contents

Description of capital stock

The following is a description of the material terms of, and is qualified in its entirety by, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, each of which will be in effect upon the consummation of this offering, the forms of which are filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Under “Description of capital stock,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “our company” refer to La Quinta Holdings Inc. and not to any of its subsidiaries.

Our purpose is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may now or hereafter be organized under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, or DGCL. Upon the consummation of this offering, our authorized capital stock will consist of                  shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and                  shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. Unless our board of directors determines otherwise, we will issue all shares of our capital stock in uncertificated form.

Common stock

Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters on which stockholders are entitled to vote generally, including the election or removal of directors. The holders of our common stock do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors.

Upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up and after payment in full of all amounts required to be paid to creditors and to the holders of preferred stock having liquidation preferences, if any, the holders of our common stock will be entitled to receive pro rata our remaining assets available for distribution. All shares of our common stock that will be outstanding at the time of the completion of the offering will be fully paid and non-assessable. The common stock will not be subject to further calls or assessment by us. Holders of our common stock do not have preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock. The rights, powers, preferences and privileges of holders of our common stock will be subject to those of the holders of any shares of our preferred stock or any other series or class of stock we may authorize and issue in the future.

Preferred stock

No shares of preferred stock will be issued or outstanding immediately after the offering contemplated by this prospectus. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors to establish one or more series of preferred stock (including convertible preferred stock). Unless required by law or any stock exchange, the authorized shares of preferred stock will be available for issuance without further action by the holders of our common stock. Our board of directors is able to determine, with respect to any series of preferred stock, the powers (including voting powers), preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, including, without limitation:

 

 

the designation of the series;

 

 

the number of shares of the series, which our board of directors may, except where otherwise provided in the preferred stock designation, increase (but not above the total number of authorized shares of the class) or decrease (but not below the number of shares then outstanding);

 

153


Table of Contents
 

whether dividends, if any, will be cumulative or non-cumulative and the dividend rate of the series;

 

 

the dates at which dividends, if any, will be payable;

 

 

the redemption rights and price or prices, if any, for shares of the series;

 

 

the terms and amounts of any sinking fund provided for the purchase or redemption of shares of the series;

 

 

the amounts payable on shares of the series in the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the affairs of the Company;

 

 

whether the shares of the series will be convertible into shares of any other class or series, or any other security, of the Company or any other entity, and, if so, the specification of the other class or series or other security, the conversion price or prices or rate or rates, any rate adjustments, the date or dates as of which the shares will be convertible and all other terms and conditions upon which the conversion may be made;

 

 

restrictions on the issuance of shares of the same series or of any other class or series; and

 

 

the voting rights, if any, of the holders of the series.

We could issue a series of preferred stock that could, depending on the terms of the series, impede or discourage an acquisition attempt or other transaction that some, or a majority, of the holders of our common stock might believe to be in their best interests or in which the holders of our common stock might receive a premium over the market price of the common stock. Additionally, the issuance of preferred stock may adversely affect the holders of our common stock by restricting dividends on the common stock, diluting the voting power of the common stock or subordinating the liquidation rights of the common stock. As a result of these or other factors, the issuance of preferred stock could have an adverse impact on the market price of our common stock.

Dividends

The DGCL permits a corporation to declare and pay dividends out of “surplus” or, if there is no “surplus,” out of its net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. “Surplus” is defined as the excess of the net assets of the corporation over the amount determined to be the capital of the corporation by its board of directors. The capital of the corporation is typically calculated to be (and cannot be less than) the aggregate par value of all issued shares of capital stock. Net assets equals the fair value of the total assets minus total liabilities. The DGCL also provides that dividends may not be paid out of net profits if, after the payment of the dividend, remaining capital would be less than the capital represented by the outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets.

Declaration and payment of any dividend will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors.

Stockholder meetings

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that annual stockholder meetings will be held at a date, time and place, if any, as

 

154


Table of Contents

exclusively selected by our board of directors. Our amended and restated bylaws provide that special meetings of the stockholders may be called only by or at the direction of the board of directors, the chairman of our board or the chief executive officer, upon the request of holders of not less than a majority of the total voting power of all the then outstanding shares of our capital stock. To the extent permitted under applicable law, we may conduct meetings by remote communications, including by webcast.

Anti-takeover effects of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and certain provisions of delaware law

Undesignated preferred stock

The ability to authorize undesignated preferred stock will make it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with super majority voting, special approval, dividend or other rights or preferences on a discriminatory basis that could impede the success of any attempt to acquire us or otherwise effect a change in control of us. These and other provisions may have the effect of deferring, delaying or discouraging hostile takeovers, or changes in control or management of our company.

We do not have a stockholder rights plan or any series of preferred stock designated in connection with such a plan, and if our board of directors were ever to adopt a stockholder rights plan in the future without prior stockholder approval, our board of directors would either submit the plan to stockholders for ratification or cause the rights plan to expire within one year.

Requirements for advance notification of stockholder meetings, nominations and proposals

Our amended and restated bylaws establish advance notice procedures with respect to stockholder proposals and the nomination of candidates for election as directors, other than nominations made by or at the direction of the board of directors or a committee of the board of directors. For any matter to be “properly brought” before a meeting, a stockholder will have to comply with advance notice requirements and provide us with certain information. Additionally, vacancies and newly created directorships may be filled only by a vote of a majority of the directors then in office, even though less than a quorum, and not by the stockholders. Our amended and restated bylaws allow the presiding officer at a meeting of the stockholders to adopt rules and regulations for the conduct of meetings which may have the effect of precluding the conduct of certain business at a meeting if the rules and regulations are not followed. These provisions may also defer, delay or discourage a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to influence or obtain control of our company.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the board of directors is expressly authorized to make, alter, or repeal our amended and restated bylaws and that our stockholders may only amend our amended and restated bylaws with the approval of       % or more of all of the outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote.

No cumulative voting

The DGCL provides that stockholders are not entitled to the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors unless our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting.

 

155


Table of Contents

Stockholder action by written consent

Pursuant to Section 228 of the DGCL, any action required to be taken at any annual or special meeting of the stockholders may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote if a consent or consents in writing, setting forth the action so taken, is signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares of our stock entitled to vote thereon were present and voted, unless the company’s certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that from and after the date on which the parties to our stockholders’ agreement cease to beneficially own at least       % of the total voting power of all the then outstanding shares of our capital stock, any action required or permitted to be taken by our stockholders may not be effected by consent in writing by stockholders unless such action is recommended by all directors then in office.

Delaware anti-takeover statute

We have opted out of Section 203 of the DGCL. Section 203 provides that, subject to certain exceptions specified in the law, a publicly-held Delaware corporation shall not engage in certain “business combinations” with any “interested stockholder” for a three-year period after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder. These provisions generally prohibit or delay the accomplishment of mergers, assets or stock sales or other takeover or change-in-control attempts that are not approved by a company’s board of directors.

However, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws will provide that in the event the parties to our stockholders’ agreement cease to beneficially own at least       % of the then outstanding shares of our common stock, we will automatically become subject to Section 203 of the DGCL. In general, Section 203 prohibits a publicly-held Delaware corporation from engaging, under certain circumstances, in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years following the date the person became an interested stockholder unless:

 

 

prior to the date of the transaction, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;

 

 

upon completion of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the number of shares outstanding (1) shares owned by persons who are directors and also officers and (2) shares owned by employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or

 

 

on or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the business combination is approved by the board and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the interested stockholder.

Generally, a business combination includes a merger, asset or stock sale, or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. An interested stockholder is a

 

156


Table of Contents

person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns or, within three years prior to the determination of interested stockholder status, did own 15% or more of a corporation’s outstanding voting stock.

Under certain circumstances, Section 203 makes it more difficult for a person who would be an “interested stockholder” to effect various business combinations with a corporation for a three-year period. Accordingly, Section 203 could have an anti-takeover effect with respect to certain transactions our board of directors does not approve in advance. The provisions of Section 203 may encourage companies interested in acquiring the Company to negotiate in advance with our board of directors because the stockholder approval requirement would be avoided if our board of directors approves either the business combination or the transaction that results in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder. However, Section 203 also could discourage attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares of common stock held by stockholders. These provisions also may make it more difficult to accomplish transactions that stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their best interests.

Dissenters’ rights of appraisal and payment

Under the DGCL, with certain exceptions, our stockholders will have appraisal rights in connection with a merger or consolidation of our company. Pursuant to the DGCL, stockholders who properly request and perfect appraisal rights in connection with such merger or consolidation will have the right to receive payment of the fair value of their shares as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery.

Stockholders’ derivative actions

Under the DGCL, any of our stockholders may bring an action in our name to procure a judgment in our favor, also known as a derivative action, provided that the stockholder bringing the action is a holder of our shares at the time of the transaction to which the action relates or such stockholder’s stock thereafter devolved by operation of law.

Exclusive forum

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that unless we consent to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall be the sole and exclusive forum for any (i) derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf, to the fullest extent permitted by law, of our company, (ii) action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director or officer of our company to our company or our stockholders, creditors or other constituents, (iii) action asserting a claim against our company or any director or officer of our company arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws, or (iv) action asserting a claim against our company or any director or officer of our company governed by the internal affairs doctrine, in each such case subject to said Court of Chancery having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named as defendants therein. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of capital stock of our company shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to the forum provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. However, it is possible that a court could find our forum selection provision to be inapplicable or unenforceable.

 

157


Table of Contents

Conflicts of interest

Delaware law permits corporations to adopt provisions renouncing any interest or expectancy in certain opportunities that are presented to the corporation or its officers, directors or stockholders, and certain of our directors sit on the board of directors of other companies in the hospitality industry. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will, to the maximum extent permitted from time to time by Delaware law, renounce any interest or expectancy that we have in, or right to be offered an opportunity to participate in, specified business opportunities that are from time to time presented to our officers, directors or stockholders or their respective affiliates, other than those officers, directors, stockholders or affiliates who are our or our subsidiaries’ employees. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, none of Blackstone or any director who is not employed by us (including any non-employee director who serves as one of our officers in both his director and officer capacities) or his or her affiliates will have any duty to refrain from (i) engaging in a corporate opportunity in the same or similar lines of business in which we or our affiliates now engage or propose to engage or (ii) otherwise competing with us or our affiliates. In addition, to the fullest extent permitted by law, in the event that Blackstone or any non-employee director acquires knowledge of a potential transaction or other business opportunity which may be a corporate opportunity for itself or himself or its or his affiliates or for us or our affiliates, such person will have no duty to communicate or offer such transaction or business opportunity to us or any of our affiliates and they may take any such opportunity for themselves or offer it to another person or entity. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will not renounce our interest in any business opportunity that is expressly offered to a non-employee director solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of the Company. To the fullest extent permitted by law, no business opportunity will be deemed to be a potential corporate opportunity for us unless we would be permitted to undertake the opportunity under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, we have sufficient financial resources to undertake the opportunity and the opportunity would be in line with our business.

Limitations on liability and indemnification of officers and directors

The DGCL authorizes corporations to limit or eliminate the personal liability of directors to corporations and their stockholders for monetary damages for breaches of directors’ fiduciary duties, subject to certain exceptions. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation includes a provision that eliminates the personal liability of directors for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except to the extent such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted under the DGCL. The effect of these provisions is to eliminate the rights of us and our stockholders, through stockholders’ derivative suits on our behalf, to recover monetary damages from a director for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, including breaches resulting from grossly negligent behavior. However, exculpation does not apply to any director if the director has acted in bad faith, knowingly or intentionally violated the law, authorized illegal dividends or redemptions or derived an improper benefit from his or her actions as a director.

Our amended and restated bylaws provide that we must indemnify and advance expenses to our directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized by the DGCL. We also are expressly authorized to carry directors’ and officers’ liability insurance providing indemnification for our directors, officers and certain employees for some liabilities. We believe that these indemnification and advancement provisions and insurance are useful to attract and retain qualified directors and executive officers.

 

158


Table of Contents

The limitation of liability, indemnification and advancement provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions also may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against directors and officers, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders. In addition, your investment may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers pursuant to these indemnification provisions.

There is currently no pending material litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is sought.

Indemnification agreements

We intend to enter into an indemnification agreement with each of our directors and executive officers as described in “Certain relationships and related party transactions—Indemnification agreements.” Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors or executive officers, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy and is therefore unenforceable.

Transfer agent and registrar

The transfer agent and registrar for shares of our common stock will be            .

Listing

We intend to apply to have our common stock approved for listing on                  under the symbol “                 .”

 

159


Table of Contents

Shares eligible for future sale

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for shares of our common stock. We cannot predict the effect, if any, future sales of shares of common stock, or the availability for future sale of shares of common stock, will have on the market price of shares of our common stock prevailing from time to time. The sale of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could harm the prevailing market price of shares of our common stock and could impair our future ability to raise capital through the sale of our equity or equity-related securities at a time and price that we deem appropriate. See “Risk factors—Risks related to this offering and ownership of our common stock—Future sales, or the perception of future sales, by us or our existing investors of additional shares of our common stock after this offering could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.”

Upon completion of this offering we will have a total of                  shares of our common stock outstanding (or                  shares if the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase additional shares). Of the outstanding                 shares, the shares sold in this offering (or                  shares if the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase additional shares) will be freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, except that any shares held by our affiliates, as that term is defined under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, may be sold only in compliance with the limitations described below. The remaining outstanding                  shares of common stock held by our existing owners after this offering will be deemed restricted securities under the meaning of Rule 144 and may be sold in the public market only if registered or if they qualify for an exemption from registration, including the exemptions pursuant to Rule 144, which we summarize below.

We intend to file one or more registration statements on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock issued pursuant to our Omnibus Incentive Plan. Any such Form S-8 registration statements will automatically become effective upon filing. Accordingly, subject to applicable vesting restrictions or lock-up restrictions (described below), shares registered under such registration statements will be available for sale in the open market. We expect that the initial registration statement on Form S-8 will cover                  shares.

Registration rights

In connection with this offering, we intend to enter into a registration rights agreement that will provide Blackstone an unlimited number of “demand” registrations and customary “piggyback” registration rights. The registration rights agreement also provides that we will pay certain expenses relating to such registrations and indemnify the registration rights holders against certain liabilities which may arise under the Securities Act. Securities registered under any such registration statement will be available for sale in the open market unless restrictions apply. See “Certain relationships and related party transactions —Registration rights agreement.”

Lock-up agreements

We have agreed, subject to certain customary exceptions, that we will not offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, or file with the SEC a registration statement under the Securities Act relating to, any shares of our common stock or securities

 

160


Table of Contents

convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of our common stock, or publicly disclose the intention to make any such offer, sale, pledge, disposition or filing, without the prior written consent of              for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus.

Our executive officers, directors and Blackstone have agreed, subject to certain customary exceptions, that they will not offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of our common stock, enter into a transaction that would have the same effect, or enter into any swap, hedge or other arrangement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of our common stock, whether any of these transactions are to be settled by delivery of our common stock or other securities, in cash or otherwise, or publicly disclose the intention to make any such offer, sale, pledge or disposition, or to enter into any transaction, swap, hedge or other arrangement, without, in each case, the prior written consent of              for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus.

Rule 144

In general, under Rule 144, as currently in effect, a person who is not deemed to be our affiliate for purposes of Rule 144 or to have been one of our affiliates at any time during the three months preceding a sale and who has beneficially owned the shares of common stock proposed to be sold for at least six months, including the holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates, is entitled to sell those shares of common stock without complying with the manner of sale, volume limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144, subject to compliance with the public information requirements of Rule 144. If such a person has beneficially owned the shares of common stock proposed to be sold for at least one year, including the holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates, then that person is entitled to sell those shares of common stock without complying with any of the requirements of Rule 144. In general, six months after the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, under Rule 144, as currently in effect, our affiliates or persons selling shares of common stock on behalf of our affiliates are entitled to sell, within any three-month period, a number of shares of common stock that does not exceed the greater of (1) 1% of the number of shares of common stock then outstanding and (2) the average weekly trading volume of the shares of common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to that sale. Sales under Rule 144 by our affiliates or persons selling shares of common stock on behalf of our affiliates are also subject to certain manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us.

 

161


Table of Contents

Certain United States federal income and estate tax consequences to non-U.S. holders

The following is a summary of certain United States federal income and estate tax consequences to a non-U.S. holder (as defined below) of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common stock issued pursuant to this offering. Except where noted, this summary deals only with common stock that is held as a capital asset.

A “non-U.S. holder” means a person (other than a partnership) that is not for United States federal income tax purposes any of the following:

 

 

an individual citizen or resident of the United States;

 

 

a corporation (or any other entity treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

 

 

an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

 

 

a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable United States Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States person.

This summary is based upon provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and regulations, rulings and judicial decisions as of the date hereof. Those authorities may be changed, perhaps retroactively, so as to result in United States federal income and estate tax consequences different from those summarized below. This summary does not address all aspects of United States federal income and estate taxes and does not deal with foreign, state, local or other tax considerations that may be relevant to non-U.S. holders in light of their particular circumstances. In addition, it does not represent a detailed description of the United States federal income tax consequences applicable to you if you are subject to special treatment under the United States federal income tax laws (including if you are a United States expatriate, “controlled foreign corporation,” “passive foreign investment company” or a partnership or other pass-through entity for United States federal income tax purposes). We cannot assure you that a change in law will not alter significantly the tax considerations that we describe in this summary.

If a partnership holds our common stock, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of a partnership holding our common stock, you should consult your tax advisors.

If you are considering the purchase of our common stock, you should consult your own tax advisors concerning the particular United States federal income and estate tax consequences to you of the ownership of the common stock, as well as the consequences to you arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction or under any applicable income tax treaty.

Dividends

If we make distributions of cash or property on our common stock, such distributions will constitute dividends for United States federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from our

 

162


Table of Contents

current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under United States federal income tax principles. Amounts not treated as dividends for United States federal income tax purposes will constitute a return of capital and first be applied against and reduce a non-U.S. holder’s adjusted tax basis in its common stock, but not below zero. Any excess will be treated as capital gain and will be treated as described below under “—Gain on disposition of common stock.”

Dividends paid to a non-U.S. holder of our common stock generally will be subject to withholding of United States federal income tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty. However, dividends that are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by the non-U.S. holder within the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, are attributable to a United States permanent establishment of the non-U.S. holder) are not subject to the withholding tax, provided certain certification and disclosure requirements are satisfied. Instead, such dividends are subject to United States federal income tax on a net income basis in the same manner as if the non-U.S. holder were a United States person as defined under the Code. Any such effectively connected dividends received by a foreign corporation may be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

A non-U.S. holder of our common stock who wishes to claim the benefit of an applicable treaty rate for dividends will be required (a) to complete Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN (or other applicable form) and certify under penalty of perjury that such holder is not a United States person as defined under the Code and is eligible for treaty benefits or (b) if our common stock is held through certain foreign intermediaries, to satisfy the relevant certification requirements of applicable United States Treasury regulations. Special certification and other requirements apply to certain non-U.S. holders that are pass-through entities rather than corporations or individuals.

A non-U.S. holder of our common stock eligible for a reduced rate of United States withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by timely filing an appropriate claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service.

Gain on disposition of common stock

Any gain realized on the disposition of our common stock generally will not be subject to United States federal income tax unless:

 

 

the gain is effectively connected with a trade or business of the non-U.S. holder in the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a United States permanent establishment of the non-U.S. holder);

 

 

the non-U.S. holder is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of that disposition, and certain other conditions are met; or

 

 

we are or have been a “United States real property holding corporation” for United States federal income tax purposes.

Gain described in the first bullet point immediately above will be subject to United States federal income tax on a net income basis under regular graduated United States federal income tax rates. An individual non-U.S. holder described in the second bullet point immediately above will be subject to a flat 30% tax on the gain derived from the sale, which may be offset by United States source capital losses, even though the individual is not considered a resident of the United States. If a non-U.S. holder that is a foreign corporation falls under the first bullet point

 

163


Table of Contents

immediately above, it will be subject to United States federal income tax on its net gain in the same manner as if it were a United States person as defined under the Code and, in addition, may be subject to the branch profits tax equal to 30% of its effectively connected earnings and profits or at such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

We believe that as of the time of the offering, we will be a “United States real property holding corporation” for United States federal income tax purposes. So long as our common stock continues to be regularly traded on an established securities market (within the meaning of applicable United States Treasury regulations), only a non-U.S. holder who holds or held (at any time during the shorter of the five year period preceding the date of disposition or the holder’s holding period) more than 5% of our common stock will be subject to United States federal income tax on the disposition of our common stock.

Federal estate tax

Common stock held by an individual non-U.S. holder at the time of death will be included in such holder’s gross estate for United States federal estate tax purposes, unless an applicable estate tax treaty provides otherwise.

Information reporting and backup withholding

We must report annually to the Internal Revenue Service and to each non-U.S. holder the amount of dividends paid to such holder and the tax withheld with respect to such dividends, regardless of whether withholding was required. Copies of the information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which the non-U.S. holder resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty.

A non-U.S. holder will be subject to backup withholding for dividends paid to such holder unless such holder certifies under penalty of perjury that it is a non-U.S. holder (such as by furnishing a valid IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8ECI) and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that such holder is a United States person as defined under the Code, or such holder otherwise establishes an exemption.

Information reporting and, depending on the circumstances, backup withholding will apply to the proceeds of a sale of our common stock within the United States or conducted through certain United States-related financial intermediaries, unless the beneficial owner certifies under penalty of perjury that it is a non-U.S. holder (such as by furnishing a valid IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8ECI) and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the beneficial owner is a United States person as defined under the Code, or such owner otherwise establishes an exemption.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against a non-U.S. holder’s United States federal income tax liability provided the required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.

Additional withholding requirements

Under legislation enacted in 2010 and administrative guidance, a 30% United States federal withholding tax may apply to any dividends paid after June 30, 2014, and the gross proceeds

 

164


Table of Contents

from a disposition of our common stock occurring after December 31, 2016, in each case paid to (i) a “foreign financial institution” (as specifically defined in the legislation), whether such foreign financial institution is the beneficial owner or an intermediary, unless such foreign financial institution agrees to verify, report and disclose its United States “account” holders (as specifically defined in the legislation) and meets certain other specified requirements or (ii) a non-financial foreign entity, whether such non-financial foreign entity is the beneficial owner or an intermediary, unless such entity provides a certification that the beneficial owner of the payment does not have any substantial United States owners or provides the name, address and taxpayer identification number of each such substantial United States owner and certain other specified requirements are met. In certain cases, the relevant foreign financial institution or non-financial foreign entity may qualify for an exemption from, or be deemed to be in compliance with, these rules. You should consult your own tax advisor regarding this legislation and whether it may be relevant to your ownership and disposition of our common stock.

 

165


Table of Contents

Underwriting

We are offering the shares of common stock described in this prospectus through a number of underwriters. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC are acting as joint book-running managers of the offering and as representatives of the underwriters. We have entered into an underwriting agreement with the underwriters. Subject to the terms and conditions of the underwriting agreement, we have agreed to sell to the underwriters, and each underwriter has severally agreed to purchase, at the public offering price less the underwriting discounts and commissions set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, the number of shares of common stock listed next to its name in the following table:

 

Name    Number of
shares

 

J.P. Morgan Securities LLC

  

Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC

  
  
  
  
  

 

Total

  

 

The underwriters are committed to purchase all the common shares offered by us if they purchase any shares. The underwriting agreement also provides that if an underwriter defaults, the purchase commitments of non-defaulting underwriters may also be increased or the offering may be terminated.

The underwriters propose to offer the common shares directly to the public at the initial public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and to certain dealers at that price less a concession not in excess of $             per share. Any such dealers may resell shares to certain other brokers or dealers at a discount of up to $             per share from the initial public offering price. After the initial public offering of the shares, the offering price and other selling terms may be changed by the underwriters. Sales of shares made outside of the United States may be made by affiliates of the underwriters.

The underwriters have an option to buy up to                 additional shares of common stock from us to cover sales of shares by the underwriters which exceed the number of shares specified in the table above. The underwriters have 30 days from the date of this prospectus to exercise this over-allotment option. If any shares are purchased with this over-allotment option, the underwriters will purchase shares in approximately the same proportion as shown in the table above. If any additional shares of common stock are purchased, the underwriters will offer the additional shares on the same terms as those on which the shares are being offered.

 

166


Table of Contents

The underwriting fee is equal to the public offering price per share of common stock less the amount paid by the underwriters to us per share of common stock. The underwriting fee is $             per share. The following table shows the per share and total underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid to the underwriters assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares.

 

      Without
over-allotment
exercise
     With full
over-allotment
exercise
 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Per Share

   $                        $                    

Total

   $         $     

 

 

We estimate that the total expenses of this offering, including registration, filing and listing fees, printing fees and legal and accounting expenses, but excluding the underwriting discounts and commissions, will be approximately $            .

A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the web sites maintained by one or more underwriters participating in the offering. The underwriters may agree to allocate a number of shares to underwriters for sale to their online brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be allocated by the representatives to underwriters that may make Internet distributions on the same basis as other allocations.

We have agreed, subject to certain customary exceptions, that we will not offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, or file with the SEC a registration statement under the Securities Act relating to, any shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of our common stock, or publicly disclose the intention to make any such offer, sale, pledge, disposition or filing, without the prior written consent of              for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus.

Our executive officers, directors, and Blackstone have entered into lock-up agreements with the underwriters prior to the commencement of this offering pursuant to which each of these persons or entities, subject to certain customary exceptions, for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus, may not, without the prior written consent of             , offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of our common stock, enter into a transaction that would have the same effect, or enter into any swap, hedge or other arrangement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of our common stock, whether any of these transactions are to be settled by delivery of our common stock or other securities, in cash or otherwise, or publicly disclose the intention to make any such offer, sale, pledge or disposition, or to enter into any transaction, swap, hedge or other arrangement.

We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933.

We will apply to have our common stock approved for listing on             under the symbol “                “.

In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in stabilizing transactions, which involves making bids for, purchasing and selling shares of common stock in the open market for the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the common stock while this offering is in progress. These stabilizing transactions may include making short sales of the

 

167


Table of Contents

common stock, which involves the sale by the underwriters of a greater number of shares of common stock than they are required to purchase in this offering, and purchasing shares of common stock on the open market to cover positions created by short sales. Short sales may be “covered” shorts, which are short positions in an amount not greater than the underwriters’ over-allotment option referred to above, or may be “naked” shorts, which are short positions in excess of that amount. The underwriters may close out any covered short position either by exercising their over-allotment option, in whole or in part, or by purchasing shares in the open market. In making this determination, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market compared to the price at which the underwriters may purchase shares through the over-allotment option. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the common stock in the open market that could adversely affect investors who purchase in this offering. To the extent that the underwriters create a naked short position, they will purchase shares in the open market to cover the position.

The underwriters have advised us that, pursuant to Regulation M of the Securities Act of 1933, they may also engage in other activities that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the price of the common stock, including the imposition of penalty bids. This means that if the representatives of the underwriters purchase common stock in the open market in stabilizing transactions or to cover short sales, the representatives can require the underwriters that sold those shares as part of this offering to repay the underwriting discount received by them.

These activities may have the effect of raising or maintaining the market price of the common stock or preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the common stock, and, as a result, the price of the common stock may be higher than the price that otherwise might exist in the open market. If the underwriters commence these activities, they may discontinue them at any time. The underwriters may carry out these transactions on the                 , in the over-the-counter market or otherwise.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. The initial public offering price will be determined by negotiations between us and the representatives of the underwriters. In determining the initial public offering price, we and the representatives of the underwriters expect to consider a number of factors including:

 

 

the information set forth in this prospectus and otherwise available to the representatives;

 

 

our prospects and the history and prospects for the industry in which we compete;

 

 

an assessment of our management;

 

 

our prospects for future earnings;

 

 

the general condition of the securities markets at the time of this offering;

 

 

the recent market prices of, and demand for, publicly traded common stock of generally comparable companies; and

 

 

other factors deemed relevant by the underwriters and us.

Neither we nor the underwriters can assure investors that an active trading market will develop for our common shares, or that the shares will trade in the public market at or above the initial public offering price.

 

168


Table of Contents

Other than in the United States, no action has been taken by us or the underwriters that would permit a public offering of the securities offered by this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. The securities offered by this prospectus may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, nor may this prospectus or any other offering material or advertisements in connection with the offer and sale of any such securities be distributed or published in any jurisdiction, except under circumstances that will result in compliance with the applicable rules and regulations of that jurisdiction. Persons into whose possession this prospectus comes are advised to inform themselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to the offering and the distribution of this prospectus. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities offered by this prospectus in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or a solicitation is unlawful.

This document is only being distributed to and is only directed at (i) persons who are outside the United Kingdom or (ii) to investment professionals falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “Order”) or (iii) high net worth entities, and other persons to whom it may lawfully be communicated, falling with Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order (all such persons together being referred to as “relevant persons”). The securities are only available to, and any invitation, offer or agreement to subscribe, purchase or otherwise acquire such securities will be engaged in only with, relevant persons. Any person who is not a relevant person should not act or rely on this document or any of its contents.

In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a ‘‘Relevant Member State’’), from and including the date on which the European Union Prospectus Directive (the ‘‘EU Prospectus Directive’’) was implemented in that Relevant Member State (the ‘‘Relevant Implementation Date’’) an offer of securities described in this prospectus may not be made to the public in that Relevant Member State prior to the publication of a prospectus in relation to the shares which has been approved by the competent authority in that Relevant Member State or, where appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member State and notified to the competent authority in that Relevant Member State, all in accordance with the EU Prospectus Directive, except that, with effect from and including the Relevant Implementation Date, an offer of securities described in this prospectus may be made to the public in that Relevant Member State at any time:

 

 

to any legal entity which is a qualified investor as defined under the EU Prospectus Directive;

 

 

to fewer than 100 or, if the Relevant Member State has implemented the relevant provision of the 2010 PD Amending Directive, 150 natural or legal persons (other than qualified investors as defined in the EU Prospectus Directive); or

 

 

in any other circumstances falling within Article 3(2) of the EU Prospectus Directive, provided that no such offer of securities described in this prospectus shall result in a requirement for the publication by us of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the EU Prospectus Directive.

For the purposes of this provision, the expression an ‘‘offer of securities to the public’’ in relation to any securities in any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the securities to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe for the securities, as the same may be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing the EU Prospectus Directive in that Member State. The expression “EU Prospectus Directive” means Directive 2003/71/EC (and any amendments thereto, including the 2010 PD Amending Directive, to the extent implemented in

 

169


Table of Contents

the Relevant Member State) and includes any relevant implementing measure in each Relevant Member State, and the expression “2010 PD Amending Directive” means Directive 2010/73/EU.

Certain of the underwriters and their affiliates have provided in the past to us and our affiliates and may provide from time to time in the future certain commercial banking, financial advisory, investment banking and other services for us and such affiliates in the ordinary course of their business, for which they have received and may continue to receive customary fees and commissions. Most recently, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC or its affiliates acted as financial advisor and underwriter to our Sponsor in a variety of transactions including financings and loan originations, loan syndications, initial public offerings, secondary equity offerings, debt offerings and mergers and acquisitions, and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC or its affiliates acted as financial advisor and underwriter to our Sponsor in a variety of transactions including financings and loan originations, loan syndications, initial public offerings, secondary equity offerings, debt offerings, distributions of funds and mergers and acquisitions. In addition, from time to time, certain of the underwriters and their affiliates may effect transactions for their own account or the account of customers, and hold on behalf of themselves or their customers, long or short positions in our debt or equity securities or loans, and may do so in the future.

 

170


Table of Contents

Legal matters

The validity of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus will be passed upon for us by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, New York. Certain legal matters relating to this offering will be passed upon for the underwriters by Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, New York. An investment vehicle comprised of selected partners of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, members of their families, related persons and others owns an interest representing less than 1% of the capital commitments of funds affiliated with The Blackstone Group L.P.

Experts

The combined financial statements of the Predecessor Entities as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, included in this prospectus, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein. Such combined financial statements have been so included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

The combined financial statements of WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 included in this prospectus have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their report herein, and are included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

The balance sheet of La Quinta Holdings Inc. as of December 17, 2013 included in this prospectus has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein. Such balance sheet has been so included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

 

171


Table of Contents

Where you can find more information

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Forms S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the common stock offered by this prospectus. This prospectus is a part of the registration statement and does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and its exhibits and schedules, portions of which have been omitted as permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information about us and our common stock, you should refer to the registration statement and its exhibits and schedules.

We will file annual, quarterly and special reports and other information with the SEC. Our filings with the SEC will be available to the public on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Those filings will also be available to the public on, or accessible through, our website under the heading “Investor Relations” at www.lq.com. The information we file with the SEC or contained on or accessible through our corporate website or any other website that we may maintain is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. You may also read and copy, at SEC prescribed rates, any document we file with the SEC, including the registration statement (and its exhibits) of which this prospectus is a part, at the SEC’s Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. You can call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 to obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.

We intend to make available to our common stockholders annual reports containing combined financial statements audited by an independent registered public accounting firm.

 

172


Table of Contents

Index to financial statements

 

Lodge Holdco I L.L.C. and Subsidiaries, Lodge Holdco II L.L.C. and Subsidiaries and Lodge Holdco III L.L.C. and Subsidiaries (“La Quinta Predecessor Entities”)

  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     F-2   

Combined Financial Statements of the La Quinta Predecessor Entities:

  

Combined Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011

     F-3   

Combined Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

     F-4   

Combined Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

     F-5   

Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

     F-6   

Notes to Combined Financial Statements

     F-8   

Unaudited Condensed Combined Financial Statements of the La Quinta Predecessor Entities:

  

Condensed Combined Balance Sheets (Unaudited) as of September, 2013 and December 31, 2012

     F-36   

Condensed Combined Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

     F-37   

Condensed Combined Statements of Equity (Unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

     F-38   

Condensed Combined Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

     F-39   

Notes to Condensed Combined Financial Statements (Unaudited)

     F-41   

WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels

  

Independent Auditor’s Report

     F-56   

Combined Financial Statements of the WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels:

  

Combined Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011

     F-58   

Combined Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

     F-59   

Combined Statements of Changes in Member’s Equity for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

     F-60   

Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

     F-61   

Notes to Combined Financial Statements

     F-62   

Unaudited Combined Financial Statements of the WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels:

  

Combined Balance Sheets (Unaudited) as of September, 2013 and December 31, 2012

     F-68   

Combined Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

     F-69   

Combined Statements of Changes in Member’s Equity (Unaudited) for the nine months ended September  30, 2013 and 2012

     F-70   

Combined Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

     F-71   

Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Unaudited)

     F-72   

La Quinta Holdings Inc.

  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     F-79   

Balance Sheet as of December 17, 2013

     F-80   

Notes to Balance Sheet

     F-81   

 

F-1


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Lodge Holdco I L.L.C, Lodge Holdco II L.L.C, and Lodge Holdco III L.L.C.

Irving, Texas

We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of Lodge Holdco I L.L.C. and subsidiaries, Lodge Holdco II L.L.C. and subsidiaries and Lodge Holdco III L.L.C. and subsidiaries, (the “Company”), all of which are under common control, as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related combined statements of operations, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such combined financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lodge Holdco I L.L.C. and subsidiaries, Lodge Holdco II L.L.C. and subsidiaries and Lodge Holdco III L.L.C. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Dallas, Texas

December 23, 2013

 

F-2


Table of Contents

La Quinta Predecessor Entities

Combined Balance Sheets

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011

 

      2012     2011  

 

 
     (in thousands)  
ASSETS     

Current Assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 40,813      $ 90,857   

Restricted cash

     104,814        50,151   

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,888 and $4,626

     36,917        33,364   

Receivables from affiliates

     8,261        7,934   

Other current assets

     10,097        9,876   
  

 

 

 

Total Current Assets

     200,902        192,182   
  

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation

     2,940,128        3,076,531   

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization

     180,913        182,508   

Deferred costs, net of accumulated amortization

     11,407        8,248   

Restricted cash

     8,593        10,594   

Deferred tax assets

     3,090        3,173   

Other non-current assets

     11,287        10,996   
  

 

 

 

Total Non-Current Assets

     3,155,418        3,292,050   
  

 

 

 

Total Assets

   $ 3,356,320      $ 3,484,232   
  

 

 

 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY     

Current Liabilities:

    

Current portion of long-term debt

   $ 61,292      $ 282,020   

Accounts payable

     33,784        32,445   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     53,381        45,442   

Accrued payroll and employee benefits

     29,867        29,134   

Accrued real estate taxes

     20,002        19,551   
  

 

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

     198,326        408,592   
  

 

 

 

Long-term debt

     2,838,673        2,876,389   

Other long-term liabilities

     15,489        15,660   

Deferred tax liabilities

     447        496   
  

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

     3,052,935        3,301,137   
  

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies

              

Equity:

    

Members’ equity

     315,255        189,585   

Noncontrolling interests

     (11,870     (6,490
  

 

 

 

Total Equity

     303,385        183,095   
  

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Equity

   $ 3,356,320      $ 3,484,232   

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.

 

F-3


Table of Contents

La Quinta Predecessor Entities

Combined Statements of Operations

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

 

     2012     2011     2010  

 

 
          (in thousands)        

REVENUES:

     

Room revenues

  $ 714,143      $ 660,816      $ 623,720   

Franchise and other fee-based revenues

    69,206        59,314        52,074   

Other hotel revenues

    17,506        16,229        16,821   
 

 

 

 
    800,855        736,359        692,615   

Brand marketing fund revenues from franchise and managed properties

    17,157        15,182        13,238   
 

 

 

 

Total Revenues

    818,012        751,541        705,853   

OPERATING EXPENSES:

     

Direct lodging expenses

    334,394        330,205        305,856   

Depreciation and amortization

    155,879        149,356        141,708   

General and administrative expenses

    74,111        61,578        63,828   

Other lodging and operating expenses

    58,266        47,791        49,623   

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses

    48,610        45,580        42,516   
 

 

 

 
    671,260        634,510        603,531   

Brand marketing fund expenses from franchise and managed properties

    17,157        15,182        13,238   
 

 

 

 

Total Operating Expenses

    688,417        649,692        616,769   
 

 

 

 

Operating Income

    129,595        101,849        89,084   

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES):

     

Interest expense, net

    (103,124     (51,611     (50,469

Other income (loss)

    (7,440     (662     1,483   

Gain on extinguishment of debt, net

    1,192        11,451        40,494   
 

 

 

 

Total Other Income (Expenses)

    (109,372     (40,822     (8,492
 

 

 

 

Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes

    20,223        61,027        80,592   

Income tax expense

    (3,135     (2,332     (2,459
 

 

 

 

Income from Continuing Operations, net of tax

    17,088        58,695        78,133   

Gain (Loss) on Discontinued Operations, net of tax

    (52,852     244        (12,150
 

 

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

    (35,764     58,939        65,983   

Loss from noncontrolling interests in continuing operations

    4,810        4,574        2,845   

Loss from noncontrolling interests in discontinued operations

                    
 

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

    4,810        4,574        2,845   
 

 

 

 

Amounts attributable to the Company

     

Income from continuing operations

    21,898        63,269        80,978   

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

    (52,852     244        (12,150
 

 

 

 

Net Income (loss) attributable to the Company

  $ (30,954   $ 63,513      $ 68,828   
 

 

 

 

Pro forma income from continuing operations data (Unaudited):

     

Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes

  $ 20,223      $ 61,027      $ 80,592   

Pro forma provision for income taxes

    8,089        24,411        32,237   
 

 

 

 

Pro forma income from continuing operations

  $ 12,134      $ 36,616      $ 48,355   

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.

 

F-4


Table of Contents

La Quinta Predecessor Entities

Combined Statements of Equity

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

 

      Members’
equity
    Noncontrolling
interests
    Total
equity
 

 

 
           (in thousands)        

Balance as of January 1, 2010

   $ 33,900      $ 2,378      $ 36,278   

Net income (loss)

     68,828        (2,845     65,983   

Capital contributions

     34,582               34,582   

Distributions

     (96,214     (1,032     (97,246
  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2010

   $ 41,096      $ (1,499     39,597   
  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

     63,513        (4,574     58,939   

Capital contributions

     85,000               85,000   

Distributions

     (24     (417     (441
  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2011

   $ 189,585      $ (6,490     183,095   
  

 

 

 

Net loss

     (30,954     (4,810     (35,764

Capital contributions

     174,862               174,862   

Distributions

     (18,238     (570     (18,808
  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2012

   $ 315,255      $ (11,870   $ 303,385   

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.

 

F-5


Table of Contents

La Quinta Predecessor Entities

Combined Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

 

      2012     2011     2010  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Cash flows from operating activities:

      

Net income (loss)

   $ (35,764   $ 58,939      $ 65,983   

Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Depreciation and amortization

     169,122        161,819        153,591   

Amortization of other non-current assets

     805        1,597        744   

Amortization of intangible assets

     1,287        1,372        1,531   

Gain on extinguishment of debt, net

     (1,192     (11,451     (40,494

Interest expense added to long-term debt

     32,332                 

Amortization of long-term debt reduction

     (4,595     (383       

(Gain) loss related to casualty disasters

     5,279        (2,367     (10

Write off of deferred costs

            1,705          

Write off of non-current assets

     165                 

Amortization of leasehold interests

     (676     (676     (701

Amortization of deferred costs

     7,317        9,280        5,157   

Financing costs expensed as incurred

     7,749                 

Impairment loss

     53,228               11,612   

Loss on sale or retirement of assets

     1,562        2,168        495   

Deferred taxes

     34        67        170   

Loss on interest rate caps

     97        168        418   

Amortization of premium on subordinated notes

            (29     (116

Provision for doubtful accounts

     1,904        2,153        1,683   

Changes in assets and liabilities:

      

Accounts receivable

     (5,186     (5,901     (4,935

Other current assets

     (47     (560     (1,033

Receivables from affiliates

     (332     566        (2,486

Other non-current assets

     (1,277     (354     (602

Accounts payable

     6,439        (393     6,843   

Accrued payroll and employee benefits

     733        3,335        2,287   

Accrued real estate taxes

     451        (1,155     (4,191

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     7,921        (698     4,166   

Other long-term liabilities

     831        1,227        665   
  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     248,187        220,429        200,777   

Cash flows from investing activities:

      

Capital expenditures

     (102,886     (95,552     (69,606

(Increase) decrease in restricted cash

     (52,662     498        (16,538

Increase in investments

     (11     (2     (14

Insurance proceeds on casualty disasters

     2,843        2,853        2,923   

Purchase of intangible assets, net

     (13     (600     (34

Proceeds from sale of assets

     1,755               452   

Repayment (payment) of franchise incentives

     22        33        (145

Proceeds from other non-current assets

            324        289   
  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (150,952     (92,446     (82,673

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.

 

F-6


Table of Contents

La Quinta Predecessor Entities

Combined Statements of Cash Flows—(continued)

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

 

      2012     2011     2010  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Cash flows from financing activities:

      

Proceeds from long-term debt

     484,918               177,922   

Repayment of long-term debt

     (765,908     (150,557     (223,078

Payment of financing costs

     (22,246     (12,099     (9,890

Investment in interest rate caps

     (97     (168     (418

Distributions to members

     (18,238     (24     (96,214

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

     (570     (417     (1,032

Members’ contributions

     174,862        85,000        34,582   
  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

     (147,279     (78,265     (118,128
  

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     (50,044     49,718        (24

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

     90,857        41,139        41,163   
  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

   $ 40,813      $ 90,857      $ 41,139   
  

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

      

Interest paid during the year

   $ 65,601      $ 43,372      $ 45,762   
  

 

 

 

Income taxes paid during the year, net of refunds

   $ 2,408      $ 2,305      $ 2,308   
  

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL NON-CASH DISCLOSURE:

      

Capital expenditures included in accounts payable

   $ 3,079      $ 10,290      $ 1,857   
  

 

 

 

Receivable for capital assets damaged by casualty disasters

   $ 3,096      $ 615      $ 63   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.

 

F-7


Table of Contents

La Quinta Predecessor Entities

Notes to Combined Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

Note 1. Organization

The accompanying combined financial statements include the accounts of Lodge Holdco I L.L.C. (“Holdco I”), Lodge Holdco II L.L.C. (“Holdco II”), Lodge Holdco III L.L.C. (“Holdco III”) (collectively herein, the “Holdcos” or “La Quinta Predecessor Entities”) and all related wholly-owned and majority owned subsidiaries. The Holdcos may also be referred to herein as “La Quinta”, “we”, “us”, “our”, or the “Company”.

Holdco I and Holdco II, Delaware limited liability companies, were formed on January 4, 2006. Holdco III, a Delaware limited liability company, was formed on March 17, 2006. Since those dates, we have been owned and controlled by Blackstone Real Estate Partners IV L.P. and affiliates (“BREP IV”) and Blackstone Real Estate Partners V L.P. and affiliates (“BREP V”). BREP IV and BREP V are affiliates of The Blackstone Group L.P. (collectivity referred to herein as the “Funds” or “Blackstone”).

We own and operate hotels, some of which are subject to ground leases, located in the United States under the La Quinta and Baymont brands, and franchise and manage hotels currently operating in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. As of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, total owned, franchised, and managed hotels, and approximate number of associated rooms were as follows (unaudited):

 

     2012     2011     2010  
    # of hotels     # of rooms     # of hotels     # of rooms     # of hotels     # of rooms  

 

 

Owned—La Quinta(1)

    371        47,000        371        47,000        371        47,000   

Owned—Baymont(1)

    11        1,200        12        1,300        12        1,300   

Joint Venture—La Quinta

    1        200        1        200        1        200   

Managed—La Quinta(2)

    14        1,700        14        1,700        14        1,700   

Franchised—La Quinta

    449        35,800        430        34,100        422        33,500   
 

 

 

 

Totals

    846        85,900        828        84,300        820        83,700   

 

 

 

(1)   See discussion of discontinued operations in Note 6.

 

(2)   These hotels are owned by affiliates of the Funds and are referred to herein as the “Managed Hotels”. (See Note 13).

Lodging operations are particularly sensitive to adverse economic and competitive conditions and trends, which could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We are contemplating participating in an initial public offering (“IPO”) by a newly formed holding company which will become our parent and anticipate completing certain transactions simultaneous with or prior to the effectiveness of the IPO including obtaining replacement financing or extension of our existing debt due in July 2014, and acquisition of the Managed Hotels and our parent will be a “C” corporation for Federal income tax purposes.

Note 2. Basis of presentation and significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation and consolidations—The accompanying combined financial statements include the accounts of the Holdcos, our wholly and majority owned subsidiaries, and entities in

 

F-8


Table of Contents

which we have a controlling financial interest, including variable interest entities (“VIEs”) where we are the primary beneficiary. The Holdcos have been presented on a combined historical cost basis due to their common ownership and control. Holdco I and Holdco II are owned 79.5% by BREP V and 19.9% by BREP IV. Holdco III is owned 99.4% by BREP V.

The accompanying combined financial statements and footnotes include LQ Management L.L.C. (“LQM”), a VIE, in which we have a significant variable financial interest, and are the primary beneficiary. LQM received no member or other capital contribution, or equity investment upon formation or thereafter. LQM’s sole purpose is to manage all of our day-to-day operations, as well as to provide day-to-day management of the Managed Hotels. In return for providing these management services, we and the Managed Hotels pay LQM a management fee and reimburse LQM for costs incurred on our behalf, and on behalf of the Managed Hotels, in accordance with management and service agreements in place. La Quinta is the primary beneficiary of LQM as the management and service agreements in place provide for La Quinta to reimburse LQM for its expenses in a manner that allows LQM to realize a reasonable profit. We have not provided financial or other support to LQM during the periods presented that we were not contractually required to provide, and LQM’s agreements with its vendors are structured as non-recourse to our general credit. Our maximum exposure to a loss as a result of involvement with LQM is related to the need to secure alternative management services and systems support if LQM were unable to fulfill its management agreement.

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, LQM’s assets and liabilities were as follows:

 

      2012      2011  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 630       $ 14,959   

Restricted cash

     8,193         10,194   

Receivables from affiliates

     58,214         33,763   

Other current assets

     4,021         4,690   

Property and equipment, net

     17,362         16,058   

Intangible assets, net

     413         524   

Accounts payable

     26,920         17,914   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     25,975         23,546   

Accrued payroll and employee benefits

     29,464         28,603   

Capital lease obligation (related party)

     21,287         19,837   

 

 

The accompanying combined financial statements and footnotes are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of estimates—The preparation of the combined financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of our assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our combined financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of our revenues and expenses during the reporting year. Actual results could differ from such estimates. Significant estimates included within our financial statements include items related to recoverability of assets such as allowance for doubtful accounts, supplies and linen inventory obsolescence, estimated value and lives of property, equipment and intangibles, and valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, as well as estimated number of redeemed points from our

 

F-9


Table of Contents

customer loyalty program, deferred revenues, insurance reserves, estimated claims from losses, revenue recognition, allocated costs, and future incentive commitments.

Revenue recognition—Revenues primarily consist of room rentals, franchise fees and other hotel revenues. We defer a portion of our revenue from franchisees at the time the franchise agreement is signed and recognize the remainder when the franchised property opens.

Room revenues are derived from room rentals at our owned hotels. We recognize room revenue on a daily basis based on an agreed-upon daily rate after the guest has stayed at one of our hotels. Customer incentive discounts, cash rebates, and refunds are recognized as a reduction of room revenues. Occupancy, hotel, and sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to the taxing authorities are excluded from revenues in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

Included in franchise and other fee-based revenues are franchise fee revenues, which primarily consist of revenues from franchisees for application, affiliation, royalty, reservations, and training, as well as fees related to our guest loyalty program (“Returns”). We recognize franchise fee revenue on a gross basis because we (1) are the primary obligor in these arrangements, (2) have latitude in establishing rates, (3) perform the services delivered, (4) have some discretion over supplier selection, and (5) determine the specification of services delivered. The different types of franchise fee revenues are described as follows:

 

 

Upon execution of a franchise agreement, a franchisee is required to pay us an initial fee. We recognize the initial fee as revenue when substantial performance of our obligations to the franchisee with respect to the initial fee has been achieved. In most cases, the vast majority of the initial fee is recognized as revenue when each franchise agreement is signed as, after that date, our remaining obligations to the franchisee are limited to (1) pre-opening inspections, for which we defer $2,500, and (2) if mandated by us or agreed to with the franchisee, pre-opening training and marketing support related to entry into the La Quinta brand, for which we defer $5,000. These amounts represent an estimate of the value provided to the franchisee related to the services provided, and are based on our experience with time, materials, and third-party costs necessary to provide these services. We recognize the remaining deferred initial fee as revenue when the franchised property opens as the remaining service obligations have been fulfilled.

 

 

We collect a monthly royalty fee from franchisees generally equal to 4.0% of their room revenues until the franchisee has operated as a La Quinta for twenty-four consecutive months. Beginning in the twenty-fifth month of operation, the franchisee monthly royalty fee generally increases to 4.5%, with the franchisee having the opportunity to earn the additional 0.5% back via rebate by achieving certain defined customer satisfaction results.

 

 

We receive reservation and technology fees, as well as fees related to Returns, in connection with franchising our La Quinta brand. Such fees are generally recognized based on a percentage of the franchisee’s hotel room revenues or room count. We perform certain other services for franchisees such as training and revenue management. Revenue for these services is recognized at the time the services are performed.

Included in franchise and other fee-based revenues are management fees of approximately $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 and $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, which represent fees earned from hotels that we manage under long-term contracts with the property owners. Management fees from hotels include a base fee, which is generally a percentage of hotel revenues. (See Note 13).

 

F-10


Table of Contents

Other hotel revenues include revenues generated by the incidental support of hotel operations for owned hotels and other rental income. We record rental income from operating leases associated with leasing space for restaurants, billboards, and cell towers. Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the respective lease agreement.

Brand marketing fund revenues from franchise and managed properties represent fees collected from franchised and managed hotels related to maintaining our Brand Marketing Fund (“BMF”). LQM maintains the BMF on behalf of all La Quinta-branded hotel properties, including our owned hotels, from which national marketing and advertising campaign expenses are paid. Each La Quinta-branded hotel is charged a percentage of its room revenue from which the expenses of the fund are covered. The corresponding expenditures of the BMF fees collected from franchised and managed hotels are presented as other expenses from franchised and managed hotels in our combined statements of operations, resulting in no impact to operating income (loss) or net income (loss).

During 2012, 2011, and 2010, we collected BMF fees from franchisees totaling $16.3 million, $14.4 million, and $12.4 million, respectively. During 2012, 2011, and 2010, we collected BMF fees from the Managed Hotels totaling $0.9 million, $0.8 million, and $0.9 million, respectively.

Non-controlling interests—Non-controlling interests are recognized within total equity in our combined balance sheets, reflected in net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in our combined statements of operations, and included in our combined statement of equity.

Cash and cash equivalents—We consider all cash on hand, demand deposits with financial institutions, and short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments that are stated at cost, which approximates fair market value. Certain balances in cash and cash equivalents exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limit of $250,000; however, we believe credit risk related to these deposits is minimal.

Restricted cash—Restricted cash classified as current assets consists of cash restricted under the terms of our mortgage loans and held in collateral property hotel depositories, escrow accounts primarily for the payment of capital expenditures, taxes, debt service, insurance losses, and ground leases, and a cash deposit for a letter of credit. (See Note 8). Restricted cash classified as non-current includes restricted cash related to certain loss deductibles and self-insured retention under a former insurance program. Restricted cash consists of cash and cash equivalents that are stated at cost, which approximates fair market value. Classification of restricted cash is based on the nature of the restrictions associated with the underlying assets.

Accounts receivable—Accounts receivable primarily consists of receivables due from franchisees, hotel guests, and credit card companies. Accounts receivable are carried at estimated collectable amounts. We periodically evaluate our receivables for collectability based on historical experience, the length of time receivables are past due, and the general economy. We provide an allowance for doubtful accounts, after considering factors that might affect the collection of accounts receivable, including historical losses and the ability of the party to meet its obligations to us. Accounts receivable are written off when determined to be uncollectable.

Property and equipment—Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation computed using a straight-line method over the estimated useful life of each asset. Property and equipment consists of the following:

 

F-11


Table of Contents

Buildings and improvements

   10 to 40 years

Hotel equipment, automobiles, furniture, and fixtures

   2 to 10 years

Leasehold improvements

   shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life

 

We periodically review the useful lives of our long-lived assets based on current assessments of the remaining utility of our assets. Such changes are accounted for prospectively and would either increase or decrease depreciation expense in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

We capitalize expenditures that increase the overall value of an asset or extend an asset’s life, typically associated with hotel refurbishment, renovation, and major repairs. Such costs primarily include third party contract labor, professional design and construction costs, including associated materials, and other direct and indirect costs, such as sales and use tax and interest costs, incurred during the redevelopment and renovation period. The capitalization period begins when the activities related to development have begun and ceases when the project is substantially complete and the assets are held available for use or occupancy. Once a redevelopment project is substantially complete and the associated assets are ready for intended use, costs related to the redevelopment project are no longer capitalized. Additionally, we capitalize costs such as construction administration, cost accounting, design and other various office costs that clearly relate to projects under development or construction (“Indirect Costs”). Total capitalized Indirect Costs were $2.7 million, $1.8 million, and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Normal maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred. When depreciable property is retired or disposed, the related cost and accumulated depreciation or amortization is removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

Assets held for sale—Long-lived assets are classified as held for sale when all of the following criteria are met:

 

 

Management commits to a plan to sell the asset and does not expect significant changes to the plan or that the plan will be withdrawn

 

 

The asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition

 

 

The asset is being actively marketed

 

 

The sale of the asset is probable within one year

When we identify a long-lived asset as held for sale, depreciation of the asset is discontinued and the carrying value is reduced, if necessary, to the estimated sales price less costs to sell by recording a charge to current earnings, reflected within discontinued operations. All assets held for sale are monitored through the date of sale for potential adjustments based on offers we are willing to take under serious consideration and continued review of facts and circumstances. An impairment loss on the disposition is recorded to the extent that the amounts ultimately received for the sale of assets differ from the adjusted book values of the assets. Gains on sales are recognized at the time the assets are sold, provided there is reasonable assurance the sales price will be collected and any future activities to be performed by the Company relating to the assets sold are expected to be insignificant.

Fair value measurements—Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or

 

F-12


Table of Contents

liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In evaluating the fair value of both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities, we use the accounting guidance that establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into three broad levels, which are as follows:

 

 

Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

 

Level 2—Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Valuations in this category are inherently less reliable than quoted market prices due to the degree of subjectivity involved in determining appropriate methodologies and the applicable underlying observable market assumptions.

 

 

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. These inputs cannot be validated by readily determinable market data and generally involve considerable judgment by management.

We use the highest observable market data if such data is available without undue cost and effort.

Valuation and impairment of long-lived assets—We annually review the performance of long-lived assets for impairment, as well as when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We also identify properties we intend to sell and properties we intend to hold for use. For each asset or group of assets held for use, we compare the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) generated by the asset or group of assets with its associated net carrying value.

If the net carrying value of the asset or group of assets exceeds expected future cash flows, the excess of the net book value over estimated fair value is charged to impairment loss in the accompanying combined statements of operations. Properties held for sale are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated sales price, less estimated costs to sell.

We estimate fair value primarily using Level 3 inputs by (1) calculating the discounted expected future cash flows, and (2) calculating expected liquidated sales proceeds, relying on common hotel valuation methods such as multiples of room revenues or per room valuations. Our estimate of fair value of the asset using these Level 3 inputs then becomes the new basis of the asset or group of assets and this new basis is then depreciated over the asset’s remaining useful life. We may be subject to impairment charges in the future, in the event that operating results of individual hotel operations are materially different from its forecasts, the economy or the lodging industry weakens, or if the assumed holding period of a hotel is shortened.

Intangible assets—Intangible assets consist of trademarks, franchise agreements and management contracts, Returns membership list, and leasehold interests. Owned trademarks are not amortized but are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired.

Intangible assets with a definite life are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which consist of the following:

 

Franchise agreements, management contracts and other

   3 to 20 years

Returns membership list

   3 years

Leasehold interests—hotels, restaurants, office

   2 to 49 years

 

 

F-13


Table of Contents

Derivative instruments—We do not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. However, we are required by our debt agreements to enter into interest rate cap agreements, which are considered to be derivative instruments that limit or cap interest expense related to our long-term debt. We do not designate these derivatives as hedges and accordingly account for such interest rate caps at fair value in the accompanying combined balance sheets, with adjustments to fair value recorded as a gain or loss on interest rate caps in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

Insurance and self-insurance programs—We purchase insurance to limit the risk of loss associated with our lodging operations and use paid loss retrospective insurance for exposures covered under commercial general liability, automobile liability, and workers’ compensation insurance policies. Predetermined loss deductibles and self-insured retentions and liability limits have been selected to limit the per occurrence cash outlay.

We have a self-insurance program for major medical and hospitalization coverage offered to employees and their dependents that is partially funded by payroll deductions from our employees. Under the self-insurance program, payments for major medical and hospitalization to individual participants which are below specified deductible amounts are paid by us through a third party administrator.

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we accrued the following liabilities related to our insurance programs:

 

      2012      2011  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Automobile and general liability insurance

   $ 20,308       $ 18,914   

Workers’ compensation

     12,152         13,813   

Health insurance

     820         704   
  

 

 

 
   $ 33,280       $ 33,431   

 

 

The liability for automobile and general liability insurance is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities and the liability for workers’ compensation and health insurance is included in accrued payroll and employee benefits in the accompanying combined balance sheets.

Customer loyalty program—We administer Returns, which allows members to earn points based on certain dollars spent. Members may redeem points earned for free night certificates, gift cards, airline miles, and a variety of other awards. We account for the economic impact of points earned by accruing an estimate of its liability for unredeemed points. The expense related to this estimate includes the incremental cost of the stay at one of our hotels or the value of awards purchased from program partners. We estimate the future redemption obligation based upon historical experience, including an estimate of “breakage” for points that will never be redeemed. The estimate is based on a calculation that includes an assumption for the redemption rate, redemption type (whether for a free night certificate or other award), and rate of redemption at Company-owned hotels versus franchised hotels. The expenses of the Returns program are charged to marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the total liability for Returns points was approximately $12.1 million and $11.0 million, respectively, of which $4.7 million and $4.4 million are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities, representing the estimated points expected to be

 

F-14


Table of Contents

redeemed in the next year. The remainder is included within other long-term liabilities in the accompanying combined balance sheets.

Actual financial results of the Returns program may vary from our estimate due primarily to variances from assumptions used in the calculation of the obligation for future redemptions and changes in member behavior. These variances are accounted for as changes in estimates and are charged to operations as they become known.

Direct lodging expenses—Direct lodging expenses primarily consist of direct labor costs, repairs and maintenance, utilities, and other advertising costs to operate our owned hotels.

Other lodging and operating expenses—Other lodging and operating expenses consist of indirect costs to operate our owned hotels such as property taxes and insurance.

General and administrative expenses—General and administrative expenses consist of items such as corporate operating expenses including operations, information technology, accounting, legal, and human resources.

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses—Brand management and other advertising expenses consist of BMF expenses not paid for with funds received from franchised or managed hotels, expenses related to other customer loyalty programs such as Returns, and other advertising expenses.

Advertising costs—We incur advertising costs associated with general promotion of the La Quinta brand and specific advertising and marketing support for our operation and for the operations of our franchisees. We expense the production cost of advertising the first time the advertising is publicly displayed.

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we incurred advertising and promotional expenses included within the following in the accompanying combined statements of operations:

 

      2012      2011      2010  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Direct lodging expenses

   $ 6,417       $ 7,188       $ 7,736   

Other lodging and operating expenses

     311         292         280   

General and administrative expenses

     1,521         1,449         1,612   

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses

     38,723         33,678         33,405   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 46,972       $ 42,607       $ 43,033   

 

 

Long-term debt amendments—We may elect to amend, extend, repay, or otherwise modify the terms of our long-term debt arrangements. When such a transaction occurs, we determine the appropriate accounting treatment primarily by first determining whether we have been fully relieved of our obligation by the creditor. If so, we recognize an extinguishment of debt and calculate a gain or loss which is reflected as gain or loss on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying combined statements of operations. If we are not fully relieved of our obligation by the creditor, we consider whether the amended debt agreement has substantially different terms, generally defined as a change in cash flows, on a present value basis, of 10 percent or greater. If the terms are not substantially different, we account for the change as a modification. If the terms are substantially different, we account for the change as an extinguishment of the old debt and the issuance of a new debt instrument. The determination of modification or extinguishment status then governs the expense versus deferral treatment of third party costs paid related to the modification.

 

F-15


Table of Contents

Income taxes—The combined financial statements include taxable entities, limited liability companies, and REIT entities. Limited liability companies and REITs are not subject to federal income taxes at the entity level. For our taxable subsidiaries, we account for income taxes using the asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting purposes. For financial reporting purposes, income tax expense or benefit is based on reported financial accounting income or loss before non-controlling interests and income taxes related to our taxable subsidiaries. Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the temporary differences between assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting and the analogous amounts recognized for tax purposes using the statutory tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse, within the taxable subsidiaries.

In connection with the IPO (See Note 1), our new parent would be subject to additional entity-level taxes that will be reflected in our financial statements. The unaudited pro forma income information gives effect to an adjustment for income tax expense as if we had been a “C” Corporation at the beginning of each year presented at an assumed combined federal and state income tax rate of 40%. This rate approximates the calculated effective tax rates for years presented.

We evaluate the probability of realizing the future benefits of deferred tax assets and provide a valuation allowance for the portion of any deferred tax assets where the likelihood of realizing an income tax benefit in the future does not meet the more-likely-than-not criteria for recognition.

We recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. As of and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we did not recognize any previously unrecorded uncertain tax positions.

The State of Texas imposes a margin tax, with an effective rate of 0.7%, based on the prior year’s Texas-sourced gross receipts. This tax is treated as an income tax and accrued in the accounting period in which the taxable gross receipts are recognized.

We are required by certain foreign jurisdictions to have franchisees withhold up to 30% of revenues related to royalties and certain other revenues. This tax is treated as an income tax and expensed in the period in which the taxable gross receipts are recognized.

Comprehensive income—Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources and includes all changes in equity during a period, except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. We have no significant components of comprehensive income other than net income.

Concentrations of credit risk and business risk—Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash. We utilize financial institutions that we consider to be of high credit quality and consider the risk of default to be minimal. We also monitor the credit-worthiness of our customers and financial institutions before extending credit or making investments.

 

F-16


Table of Contents

Geographic concentrations, which potentially subject us to concentrations of business risk, relate primarily to locations of hotels and the revenue recognized in various states within the United States. We have a concentration of hotels operating in Texas and Florida.

The percentages of our total revenues from these states for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

 

      2012      2011      2010  

 

 

Texas

     25%         25%         24%   

Florida

     13%         13%         12%   
  

 

 

 

Total

     38%         38%         36%   

 

 

Subsequent events—In connection with the preparation of the accompanying combined financial statements, we have evaluated events and transactions occurring after December 31, 2012, for potential recognition or disclosure through December 23, 2013, the date the accompanying combined financial states were available to be issued.

Note 3. Recently issued accounting standards

Newly issued accounting standards

In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued provisions of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2012-02. ASU 2012-02 introduced the option to perform a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets. If this option were selected, we would not be required to calculate the fair value of its indefinite-lived intangible assets unless we determine it is more likely than not that fair value is less that the carrying amount for such assets. The provisions of ASU 2012-02 are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, although early adoption is permitted. We have elected not to early adopt the provisions of ASU 2012-02, and do not anticipate that the new provisions will have any impact on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or disclosures.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02. This ASU amends existing guidance by requiring companies to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required to be reclassified in its entirety to net income in the same reporting period. For amounts which are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, companies will be required to cross reference other disclosures that provide information about those amounts. We adopted ASU 2013-02 prospectively as of January 1, 2013. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or disclosures.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11. This ASU provides guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists in the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from disallowance of the tax position. We plan to adopt ASU 2013-11 prospectively as of January 1, 2014, and we are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this ASU will have on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or disclosures.

 

F-17


Table of Contents

Newly adopted accounting standards

From time to time, new accounting standards are issued by the FASB or other standards setting bodies, which we adopt as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, we believe the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on our combined financial statements upon adoption.

Note 4. Non-controlling interests

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we recorded non-controlling interest deficits totaling approximately $11.9 million and $6.5 million, respectively, in the accompanying combined balance sheets. Non-controlling interests primarily consist of the following:

 

 

We hold a 60% controlling equity interest in a joint venture. The joint venture owns and operates one hotel in New Orleans, Louisiana. The non-controlling interest, totaling 40%, represents the external partner’s interest in the joint venture of approximately $2.5 million and $2.6 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Total distributions to the non-controlling interest holder were approximately $0.5, $0.3 and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

 

We have a significant financial interest in LQM but no ownership interest and are considered to be the primary beneficiary of LQM’s activities. As such, we consolidate LQM, and LQM’s results of operations and net equity or deficit are presented as a non-controlling interest. As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, LQM had a members’ deficit of approximately $14.8 million and $9.7 million, respectively.

Note 5. Intangible assets

Intangible assets consist of both finite-lived and indefinite-lived assets. The following is a summary of our intangible assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

 

     2012     2011  
    Weighted
average
remaining
life
    Amount     Weighted
average
remaining
life
    Amount  

 

 
          (in thousands)           (in thousands)  

Finite-lived assets:

       

Favorable leasehold interests—hotels, restaurants, offices

    32 years      $ 8,320        33 years      $ 8,320   

Franchise agreements, management contracts and other

    8 years        17,912        9 years        17,899   

Returns membership list

    (1)      3,200        (1)      3,200   

Accumulated amortization

      (17,953       (16,345
   

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total finite–lived assets

      11,479          13,074   

Indefinite-lived assets;

       

Trademarks—La Quinta

      169,434          169,434   
   

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total

    $ 180,913        $ 182,508   

 

 

 

(1)   As of December 31, 2012 and 2011 the Returns membership list has been fully amortized.

 

F-18


Table of Contents
      For the years ended
December 31,
 
     2012      2011      2010  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Amortization expense related to intangible assets:

  

Depreciation and amortization expense

   $ 1,287       $ 1,372       $ 1,531   

Direct lodging operations

     321         327         345   
  

 

 

 

Total amortization expense

   $ 1,608       $ 1,699       $ 1,876   

 

 

As of December 31, 2012, estimated amortization expense related to intangible assets for the years ending December 31 is as follows (in thousands):

 

2013

   $ 1,516   

2014

     1,301   

2015

     1,119   

2016

     917   

2017

     863   

Thereafter

     5,763   
  

 

 

 
   $ 11,479   

 

 

The accumulated amortization and related amortization expense described above do not include the impact of unfavorable leasehold interests which are reflected within other non-current liabilities in the accompanying combined balance sheets. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, approximately $1.0 million of amortization expense, related to unfavorable leasehold interests, was reported as a reduction of general and administrative expenses in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

Note 6. Assets held for sale and discontinued operations

In September 2012, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell one of our Baymont-branded hotels for approximately $1.8 million. As of that date, the hotel was classified as an asset held for sale, an impairment charge of $1.7 million was recognized to bring its carrying value to the lower of cost or estimated sales price, less estimated closing costs, and the results of its operations have been presented within discontinued operations for all years presented in the accompanying combined statements of operations. In December 2012, the sale of this hotel was completed.

During 2012, we began an exercise to identify hotel assets in our portfolio which, for a variety of reasons, we determined detracted from our brand. As more fully described in Note 10, as a result of a tentative disposal list of hotels being identified, and the resulting change in assumed holding period for these assets, an impairment charge of $51.5 million was recognized as part of our annual testing for impairment of long-lived assets. However, the assets did not meet all of the criteria for classification as assets held for sale as of December 31, 2012.

During the second quarter of 2013, the disposal list was finalized, causing 44 of our hotels, including all 11 of our Baymont-branded hotels, to meet all of the criteria to be classified as assets held for sale. As such, these hotels were classified as assets held for sale beginning in June 2013. Therefore in these combined financial statements, the results of their operations have accordingly been presented within discontinued operations for all years presented in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

 

F-19


Table of Contents

Between June 30, 2013 and December 23, 2013, the date the accompanying financial statements were issued, we completed the sale of 40 hotels, including all 11 Baymont-branded hotels. In accordance with the terms of our loan agreements, all proceeds associated with the sale of these hotels have been used to make principal payments on our long term-debt. (See Note 8).

The following table summarizes the operating results for discontinued operations:

 

      For the years ended
December 31,
 
     2012     2011     2010  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Hotel revenues

   $ 53,753      $ 51,611      $ 49,027   

Direct lodging expenses

     34,391        33,664        31,944   

Other lodging and operating expenses

     5,132        4,544        4,908   
  

 

 

 

Operating income

     14,230        13,403        12,175   

Depreciation and amortization

     (13,854     (13,159     (12,713

Impairment charge (see note 10)

     (53,228            (11,612
  

 

 

 

Gain (loss) on discontinued operations

   $ (52,852   $ 244      $ (12,150

 

 

Note 7. Property and equipment

The following is a summary of property and equipment as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

 

      2012     2011  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Land

   $ 843,671      $ 859,309   

Buildings and improvements

     2,720,351        2,715,964   

Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other

     356,566        333,769   
  

 

 

 

Total property and equipment

     3,920,588        3,909,042   

Less accumulated depreciation

     (987,520     (834,893
  

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

     2,933,068        3,074,149   

Construction in progress

     7,060        2,382   
  

 

 

 

Total property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation

   $ 2,940,128      $ 3,076,531   

 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment was $162.9 million, $156.2 million and $149.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Construction in progress includes capitalized costs for ongoing projects that have not yet been put into service. With the exception of the joint venture operating a hotel in New Orleans, Louisiana and three other hotels, all of our hotels are pledged as collateral for our long-term debt. (See Note 8).

 

F-20


Table of Contents

Note 8. Long-term debt

Long-term debt as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 was as follows:

 

     Interest rate  

Maturity

date

  2012     2011  

 

 
            (in thousands)  

Current:

       

Holdco I Mortgage Loan

  LIBOR + 2.664%(1)                    (2)   $ 56,250      $ 205,000   

Holdco III Mortgage Loan

  (3)                    (4)     5,042        2,020   

Holdco I Mezzanine Loans .

  LIBOR + 9.0% to 13.9%(5)                    (6)            75,000   
     

 

 

 

Current portion of long-term debt

      $ 61,292      $ 282,020   
     

 

 

 

Long-term:

       

Holdco I Mortgage Loan .

  LIBOR + 2.664%(1)                    (6)     2,092,864        2,144,658   

Holdco III Mortgage Loan

  (3)                    (7)     228,547        246,813   

Holdco I Mezzanine Loans .

  LIBOR + 9.0% to 13.9%(5)                    (6)     517,262        484,918   
     

 

 

 

Long-term debt

      $ 2,838,673      $ 2,876,389   

 

 

 

(1)   As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the 30 day United States dollar London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) was 0.21% and 0.28%, respectively. Portions of the Holdco I Mortgage Loan, with principal totaling $1.24 billion, carry interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 0.55%. The remaining Holdco I Mortgage Loan balances, with principal totaling approximately $0.9 billion, are subject to a LIBOR floor of 1.0% plus spreads ranging from 3.891% to 6.803%. The total weighted average spread for the Holdco I Mortgage Loan was 2.664% as of December 31, 2012 and 0.655% as of December 31, 2011.

 

(2)   The terms of the Holdco I Mortgage Loan require us to make quarterly principal payments beginning with the first payment date following September 30, 2012. Final maturity is July 2014.

 

(3)   The interest rate for the Holdco III Mortgage Loan as of December 10, 2011, through December 31, 2011 was LIBOR with a floor of 1.0% plus a spread of 4.0% and remained at this rate until the initial maturity of July 6, 2012. The interest rate for the Holdco III Mortgage loan as of July 6, 2012 and through December 31, 2012 was LIBOR with a floor of 1.0% plus a spread of 4.5%.

 

(4)   Principal payments are required quarterly equal to the amount of excess cash flows, as defined, held in escrowed accounts over a specified floor.

 

(5)   The Holdco I Mezzanine Loans bear interest at LIBOR plus current payment spreads ranging from 1.0% to 2.15%, and deferred payment spreads ranging from 8.0% to 11.75%, payable at maturity. Any difference between current LIBOR and the LIBOR floor of 1% is deferred to maturity. The total weighted average spread for the Holdco I Mezzanine Loans was 11.590% as of December 31, 2012 and 1.659% as of December 31, 2011.

 

(6)   As of December 31, 2011, the maturity date was July 2012. In accordance with the May 2012 amendment, the maturity date was extended to July 2014. No scheduled principal payments are required prior to the maturity date.

 

(7)   The original scheduled maturity date was July 2013. However, in July 2013, we exercised our option to extend the maturity date to July 2014. Included in the Holdco III Mortgage Loan as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is an unamortized long-term debt reduction of $6,892 and $11,487, respectively, which is being amortized using an imputed interest rate of 3.45%.

Holdco I debt

On July 6, 2007, we borrowed $2.40 billion under a mortgage loan agreement (“Mortgage Loan”) with Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, UBS Real Estate Securities, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A. (“B of A”). In December 2007, a portion of the Mortgage Loan was refinanced with a $50 million senior mezzanine loan, reducing the Mortgage Loan to $2.35 billion.

In July 2007, we entered into five unsecured, mezzanine loans, totaling $700 million in aggregate. The senior mezzanine loan and the five unsecured, mezzanine loans are collectively referred to herein as the “Mezzanine Loans”.

In July 2010, we agreed to settle one of the Mezzanine Loans for $9.4 million resulting in a net gain on debt extinguishment of approximately $40.5 million.

 

F-21


Table of Contents

In July 2011, the Funds made a contribution of $85 million which we used, along with $30 million of available cash, to settle portions of two of the Mezzanine Loans for $60.2 million and $45.2 million, respectively, resulting in a net gain on debt extinguishment of approximately $9.6 million.

In November 2011, we settled an additional portion of two of the Mezzanine Loans for a total of $23.1 million, resulting in a net gain on debt extinguishment of approximately $1.9 million.

In May 2012, the terms of the Mortgage Loan and the Mezzanine Loans (together, the “Loans”) were amended (“Amendment”). Pursuant to the Amendment, certain interest rate spreads were increased, additional assets were pledged as collateral, cash distributions to Holdco I equity holders are prohibited, and we obtained the right, at our option, to one two-year term extension following the original maturity date of July 2012. On May 24, 2012, we exercised the option to extend the maturity date of the Loans for a period of two years to the current maturity date of July 6, 2014.

In connection with the Amendment, the Funds made a cash contribution to us of approximately $175 million. We used this contribution, along with approximately $101 million of available cash, to (1) make a principal payment of $180 million on the Mortgage Loan, (2) settle a portion of the Mezzanine Loans for approximately $69.8 million, resulting in a gain on early debt extinguishment of approximately $5.2 million, and (3) pay associated closing costs of which (i) $7.7 million was expensed as incurred and is included in other income (loss) in the accompanying combined statements of operations, and (ii) $4.0 million related to Mezzanine Loans was treated as loss on extinguishment and is included within gain on extinguishment of debt, net in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

In accordance with the Amendment, we are obligated to make principal payments on the Mortgage Loan in an amount equal to (i) $12.5 million on the first scheduled debt service payment date following the last day of each of the calendar quarters ending in September 2012, December 2012, and March 2013, and (ii) $15.625 million on the first scheduled debt service payment date following the last day of each of the calendar quarters ending in June 2013, September 2013, December 2013, and March 2014.

As of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Loans are collateralized by 354 and 355 of the Company’s owned hotel properties, respectively. Concurrently with the closing of the Amendment, a newly created limited liability company, BRE/LQ Franchise Sub-Holdings, LLC (“Franchise Holdco”), was formed which assumed ownership of the net assets of our franchising and other brand-related operations. In connection with the Amendment, 100% of the member interests of Franchise Holdco were pledged as collateral for the Loans. In addition, upon closing of the Amendment, the Lenders were granted a first-priority security interest in the cash assets of the entities owned by Franchise Holdco. The Loans may be prepaid in full without penalty. Subject to certain defined premiums, individual properties may be released as collateral after prepayment of a defined portion of the Loans.

In connection with the Amendment, the Mortgage Loan carries interest at LIBOR, with portions subject to a LIBOR floor of 1.0%, plus interest rate spreads ranging from 0.55% to 6.803%, resulting in a weighted average spread of 2.664%, with all interest to be paid currently. In addition, interest for the Mezzanine Loans is subject to a LIBOR floor of 1.0%, plus interest rate spreads ranging from 9.0% to 13.9%, resulting in a weighted average spread of 11.59%. For the Mezzanine Loans, any difference between current LIBOR and the LIBOR floor, as well as the increase in the spreads as a result of the Amendment is deferred until the maturity date of the

 

F-22


Table of Contents

Mezzanine Loans. Such deferred interest is not to be treated as part of the principal amount of the Mezzanine Loans for calculation of interest or any other purpose, although it is considered debt under the Mezzanine Loans and secured accordingly.

Holdco III debt

In February 2007, subsidiaries of Holdco III entered into a $101.3 million mortgage loan (“Olympus Loan”) with B of A. The Olympus Loan was collateralized by eight hotels owned by us.

Pursuant to the terms of the Olympus Loan, the Olympus Loan matured in February 2009; however, the Olympus Loan allowed us to extend the maturity date of the Olympus Loan for three successive one-year extensions, at our option. In February 2009, we exercised the first extension option, extending the maturity of the Olympus Loan to February 2010. In February 2010, we exercised the second extension option, extending the maturity of the Olympus Loan to February 2011. In February 2011, we exercised the third extension option, extending the maturity of the Olympus Loan to February 2012. The Olympus Loan required monthly interest payments based upon LIBOR plus a spread of 1.4%.

In June 2009, we extended the maturity date of our existing $250.0 million revolving credit facility (“Revolver”) with B of A and other lenders (“Revolver Lenders”) to June 26, 2010. The Revolver was collateralized by 20 hotels owned by us.

In June 2010, we obtained a new mortgage loan (“HCIII Loan”) in the amount of $177.9 million which replaced the expiring Revolver, and the Funds concurrently made a contribution of $34.6 million which was used to release three collateralized properties. As a result, the HCIII Loan was collateralized by 17 of our hotels. Under the terms of the HCIII Loan, we were required to make monthly interest payments at LIBOR with a floor of 1.0% plus 3.5%.

In December 2011, we amended and restated the HCIII Loan. Under the new terms of the loan, the Olympus Loan and HCIII Loan were combined into one mortgage loan (“Holdco III Mortgage Loan”) with an outstanding balance of $237.3 million, and the maturity date was extended to June 2013. The Holdco III Mortgage Loan is collateralized by 25 hotels owned by us.

In connection with the closing of the Holdco III Mortgage Loan in December 2011, we made a principal payment on the Holdco III Mortgage Loan of approximately $7.8 million, paid fees of approximately $1.2 million and wrote off approximately $0.5 million of deferred financing costs, which is included in other income (loss) in the combined statements of operations. Further, B of A agreed to reduce the principal amount outstanding by approximately $11.9 million. The carrying amount of the Holdco III Mortgage Loan has not been changed as a result of this reduction. The reduction in the amount outstanding is being amortized as a reduction in interest expense through the extended maturity date using a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method.

In June 2013, we exercised our extension option and extended the maturity date of the Holdco III Mortgage Loan to July 2014. Under the terms of the Holdco III Mortgage Loan, we are required to make monthly interest payments at LIBOR with a floor of 1.0% plus a spread of 4.0% through July 2012, and thereafter at LIBOR with a floor of 1.0% plus a spread of 4.5%.

Under the terms of the loans discussed above, we are required to make deposits into certain escrow accounts for the payments of debt service, taxes, insurance, and ground leases. As of

 

F-23


Table of Contents

December 31, 2012 and 2011, amounts held in escrow and included in current restricted cash were as follows:

 

      2012      2011  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Taxes escrow fund

   $ 27,040       $ 31,477   

Operational and capital replacement reserve

     25,201         17,768   

Excess cash flow reserve

     51,919           

Ground lease reserve escrow

     654         906   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 104,814       $ 50,151   

 

 

Scheduled maturities of long term-debt:

As of December 31, 2012, our debt was scheduled to mature as follows (in thousands):

 

2013

   $ 61,292   

2014

     2,838,673   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 2,899,965   

 

 

All of our long-term debt matures on July 6, 2014. We do not expect to have sufficient cash on hand to pay the outstanding long-term debt balances expected to exist at that time in full. As such in connection with the IPO (See Note 1), we are engaged in discussions with lenders to obtain replacement financing or extension of our current debt facilities, and we believe we will be able to obtain acceptable new financing prior to the maturity of our current long-term debt.

Interest rate caps

Pursuant to the terms of the Loans and the Holdco III Mortgage Loan, we are required to maintain interest rate caps under certain defined conditions until the maturity date. The effect of the interest rate cap agreements is to limit our maximum interest rate exposure with respect to increases in LIBOR through the maturity date. We have purchased and maintained the required interest rate caps during 2012, 2011, and 2010, and the related gain or loss on these investments is reflected within other income (loss) in the accompanying statements of operations.

As of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the interest rate caps we held are estimated to have no value. Management expects that, should it be necessary, the counter parties will fully perform under the terms of the interest rate cap agreements.

Subordinated notes

In conjunction with the Company being acquired by Blackstone in January 2006, we assumed approximately $7.6 million principal amount of unsecured, subordinated notes (the “Subordinated Notes”). The Subordinated Notes, originally issued in March 2003, bore interest at an annual interest rate of 8.875%, and required semiannual interest only payments in March and September of each year. The Subordinated Notes matured and were paid on March 15, 2011.

At the date of acquisition, the Subordinated Notes were valued at approximately $7.6 million, including a premium of $0.6 million, representing fair value. The premium was amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method. The premium amortization is reflected within interest expense, net in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

 

F-24


Table of Contents

Letters of credit

Through March 2010, we maintained two letters of credit with B of A, aggregating approximately $10.2 million. We were required to pay an annual commitment fee of 1.25% on the amount of unused letters of credit and paid fees of approximately $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

In April 2010, we obtained two letters of credit through Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. aggregating approximately $9.2 million. In January 2012, the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. agreed to reduce the two letters of credit by $2.0 million, to approximately $7.2 million. We are required to pay a fee of 2.0% per annum related to these letters of credit, and paid fees of approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million for years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Interest expense, net

Interest expense consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010:

 

Description    2012     2011     2010  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Mortgage Loan

   $ 47,553      $ 26,113      $ 27,612   

Holdco III Mortgage Loan

     12,390        9,983        9,380   

Mezzanine Loans:

      

Current

     8,590        7,186        8,577   

Deferred

     32,332                 

Amortization of long-term debt reduction

     (4,595     (384       

Subordinated Notes

            45        179   

Amortization of premium on Subordinated Notes

            (29     (116

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     7,046        9,046        4,931   

Other interest

     26        26        78   

Interest income

     (218     (375     (172
  

 

 

 

Total interest expense, net

   $ 103,124      $ 51,611      $ 50,469   

 

 

Note 9. Accrued expenses and other liabilities

Accrued expenses and other liabilities include the following as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

 

      2012      2011  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Accrued automobile and general liability insurance

   $ 20,308       $ 18,914   

Accrued sales and occupancy taxes

     11,661         10,455   

Accrued guest loyalty program points

     4,717         4,418   

Accrued interest

     5,787         2,829   

Other accrued expenses

     10,908         8,826   
  

 

 

 

Total accrued expenses and other liabilities

   $ 53,381       $ 45,442   

 

 

 

F-25


Table of Contents

Note 10. Fair value measurements

The carrying amount and estimated fair values of our financial assets and liabilities, which include related current portions, were as follows:

 

      December 31, 2012      December 31, 2011  
     Carrying
amount
     Fair value      Carrying
amount
     Fair value  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Cash and cash equivalents(1)

   $ 40,813       $ 40,813       $ 90,857       $ 90,857   

Restricted Cash(1)

     113,407         113,407         60,745         60,745   

Long-term debt(2)

     2,899,965         2,889,328         3,158,409         3,094,037   

 

 

 

(1)   Classified as Level 1 under the fair value hierarchy.

 

(2)   Classified as Level 3 under the fair value hierarchy.

We believe the carrying amounts of our cash and cash equivalents approximated fair value as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. Our estimates of the fair values were determined using available market information and valuation methods appropriate in the circumstances. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair values. Proper placement of fair value measurements within the valuation hierarchy is considered each reporting period. Third-party information received for calculating Level 3 fair value measurements is reviewed to ensure it is in accordance with GAAP. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methods may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Restricted cash is primarily comprised of short-term interest-bearing money market funds with maturities of less than 90 days and time deposits. The estimated fair values were based on available market pricing information of similar financial instruments.

We estimate the fair value of our long-term debt using discounted cash flow analysis based on current market inputs for similar types of arrangements. The primary sensitivity in these calculations is based on the selection of appropriate discount rates. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011 we estimated the discount rate to be approximately 5.0% and 4.9%, respectively. Fluctuations in these assumptions will result in different estimates of fair value.

We test long-lived assets, which include property and equipment and other intangible assets, for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. In connection with the impairment test in 2012, we determined that property and equipment related to certain of our owned hotels, which became assets held for sale during the second quarter of 2013 (See Note 6), were partially impaired primarily due to changes in the assumed holding period and, as a result, we recorded an impairment loss of approximately $51.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2011, no impairment was recorded. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded an impairment loss of approximately $11.6 million. The impairment losses for 2012 and 2010 are included within discontinued operations in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

For these purposes, fair value of the properties was estimated primarily using comparable market transactions. One of the significant inputs to these fair value estimates, the per-key cost required at the time of asset transfer, is considered to be Level 3 within the fair value measurement hierarchy. A cost of $3,000 per room was utilized for this unobservable input.

 

F-26


Table of Contents

We estimate the fair value of hotels classified as held for sale using the lower of cost or estimated fair value. The inputs used in determining the fair value are considered to be Level 2 within the fair value measurement hierarchy and reflect our sales price as determined by contract with the buyer, less associated closing costs.

The following fair value hierarchy table presents information of our hotels measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2012, and related impairment charges recorded:

 

December 31, 2012    Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total fair
value
     Impairment
charge
 

 

 
     (in thousands)  

7 Baymont hotels(1)

   $     —       $ 1,755       $ 12,600       $ 14,355       $ 13,561   

14 La Quinta Inns

                     31,104         31,104         39,115   

1 La Quinta Inn and Suites

                     2,603         2,603         552   
  

 

 

 
   $       $ 1,755       $ 46,307       $ 48,062       $ 53,228   

 

 

 

(1)   Includes one hotel located in Detroit, Michigan that was sold in December 2012. (See Note 6).

The following fair value hierarchy table presents information of our hotels measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2010, and related impairment charges recorded:

 

December 31, 2010    Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total fair
value
     Impairment
charge
 

 

 
     (in thousands)  

4 Baymont hotels

   $     —       $     —       $ 9,660       $ 9,660       $ 6,065   

2 La Quinta Inns

                     4,600         4,600         4,699   

1 La Quinta Inn and Suites

                     2,700         2,700         848   
  

 

 

 
   $       $       $ 16,960       $ 16,960       $ 11,612   

 

 

Note 11. Third party lease commitments

Rental income—We act as a lessor and lease properties we own to third parties, which are primarily operated as restaurants. These leases are accounted for as operating leases and mature on various dates through 2039. The leases provide for minimum and contingent rental income based on a percentage of the lessee’s annual sales in excess of stipulated amounts.

As of December 31, 2012, approximate future minimum rental income to be received under non-cancelable operating leases, in excess of one-year, is as follows:

 

Year ending December 31,   

Operating

lease income

 

 

 
     (in thousands)  

2013

   $ 4,982   

2014

     4,801   

2015

     4,416   

2016

     3,846   

2017

     3,207   

Thereafter

     8,047   
  

 

 

 
   $ 29,299   

 

 

Total rental revenue was approximately $4.5 million, of which $0.3 million related to contingent rents, for the year ended December 31, 2012. Total rental revenue was approximately

 

F-27


Table of Contents

$4.6 million, of which $0.3 million related to contingent rents, for the year ended December 31, 2011. Total rental revenue was approximately $4.9 million, of which $0.3 million related to contingent rents, for the year ended December 31, 2010. Rental revenue is included within other hotel revenues.

Rental expense—We maintain ground lease arrangements with third parties for certain hotel properties that contain contingent rent provisions based upon the respective hotel’s revenues. Many of these lease agreements contain renewal options at fair market value at the conclusion of the initial lease terms. The leases extend for varying periods through 2096.

 

Year ending December 31,    Operating
ground lease
commitments
 

 

 
     (in thousands)  

2013

   $ 3,419   

2014

     3,442   

2015

     3,404   

2016

     3,434   

2017

     3,053   

Thereafter

     97,223   
  

 

 

 
   $ 113,975   

 

 

Total rent expense for ground leases included in other lodging and operating expenses was approximately $3.7 million, of which $0.2 million related to contingent rents, for the year ended December 31, 2012. Total rent expense was approximately $3.6 million, of which $0.1 million related to contingent rents, for the year ended December 31, 2011. Total rent expense was approximately $3.6 million, of which $0.1 million related to contingent rents, for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Note 12. Income taxes

Each of the Holdcos is a limited liability company that is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes and, as such, is not subject to federal and most state income taxes. Accordingly, no federal or state income taxes (with the exception described in the following paragraphs) have been recorded in the accompanying combined financial statements. For federal and state income tax purposes, the operating results of each of the Holdcos are reportable by their respective members.

Certain of our subsidiaries have elected to be treated as REITs for federal income tax purposes under the United States Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as REITs, these subsidiaries must meet all of the required organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that the REIT distribute at least 90% of its regular taxable income to its shareholders as dividends eligible for the dividends paid deduction. The REIT subsidiaries intend to adhere to these requirements. If the REIT subsidiaries fail to qualify as REITs in any taxable year, they would be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and might not qualify as REITs for the four subsequent taxable years. For this reason, one of our REITs formed taxable subsidiaries to hold certain assets that could otherwise adversely affect its REIT status. These taxable subsidiaries are subject to federal and state income taxes.

LQM is a limited liability company, which is not subject to federal income taxes. For federal income tax purposes, the operating results of LQM are reportable by LQM’s members.

 

F-28


Table of Contents

For financial reporting purposes, the combined income tax expense is based on combined reported financial accounting income or loss before non-controlling interests and income taxes. The components of our income tax provision are as follows:

 

      2012     2011     2010  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Current Provision:

      

Federal

   $ 812      $ 182      $ 100   

State(1)

     1,940        2,187        2,315   

Foreign

     497               3   
  

 

 

 

Total current

     3,249        2,369        2,418   

Deferred Provision:

      

Federal

     (43     (7     81   

State

     77        74        89   
  

 

 

 

Total deferred

     34        67        170   
  

 

 

 

Total provision for income taxes

   $ 3,283      $ 2,436      $ 2,588   

 

 

 

(1)   The State current provision contains approximately $148,000, $140,000 and $129,000 included in gain (loss) on discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the temporary differences between the carrying amounts of our combined assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax reporting purposes.

Significant components of our combined deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

 

      2012     2011  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Current deferred tax assets (liabilities):

    

Accrued liabilities

   $ 14,623      $ 14,765   

Bad debt allowance

     987        795   
  

 

 

 

Total current deferred tax assets

     15,610        15,560   

Less valuation allowance

     (15,610     (15,560
  

 

 

 

Net current deferred tax assets

   $      $   
  

 

 

 

Long-term deferred tax assets (liabilities):

    

Net operating loss carry forwards

   $ 207,387      $ 217,939   

Texas margin tax credit

     3,070        3,150   

Alternative minimum tax credit carry forward, net

     5,621        5,046   

Partnership investment

     (51     (100

Other

     20        23   

Installment sale

     (396     (396
  

 

 

 

Total long-term deferred tax assets

     215,651        225,662   

Less valuation allowance

     (213,008     (222,985
  

 

 

 

Net long-term deferred tax assets (liabilities)

   $ 2,643      $ 2,677   

 

 

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, certain subsidiaries of ours have available federal net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) totaling approximately $586.5 million and $615.2 million,

 

F-29


Table of Contents

respectively. Generally, NOL carryforwards expire 20 years after the year in which they arise (15 years for NOLs arising prior to 1998). Our NOLs will expire between 2016 and 2031. We also have alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) credit carry forwards, as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, in the gross amount of $5.9 million and $5.3 million, respectively, which do not expire. We maintain valuation allowances for our NOLs and AMT credit carry forwards as we believe the more-likely-than-not realization criteria are not met and therefore realization is not reasonably assured. When assessing the adequacy of the valuation allowance, the Company considers both anticipated reversals of deferred tax liabilities within applicable carryforward periods and other potential sources of taxable income within those periods. The Company has open tax years dating back to 2010.

The state of Texas imposes a margin tax, with an effective rate of 0.7%, based on the prior year’s Texas-sourced gross receipts, as defined, less a statutory percentage of available Texas margin tax credits. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had approximately $3.1 million and $3.2 million, respectively, of Texas margin tax credits that meet the more-likely-than-not criteria to be recognized as a benefit against future margin tax. The credits are scheduled to be utilized annually over a period ending in 2026. This tax is treated as an income tax and accrued in the accounting period in which the taxable gross receipts are recognized.

Note 13. Related party transactions

We maintain various agreements and enter into certain transactions with affiliates of the Funds. These affiliates own the 14 La Quinta-branded Managed Hotels which are managed by LQM. The following is a discussion of these arrangements and resulting transactions:

Management and service agreements

Hotel management agreements—Pursuant to hotel management agreements (“LQM Management Agreements”), LQM provides management services to the Managed Hotels, including supervision, direction, operation, management and promotion. The LQM Management Agreements will expire in July 2027, but may be terminated by either party at any time and for any reason. Under the terms of the LQM Management Agreements, LQM is entitled to receive a management fee of 1.67% of gross operating revenue, from hotels it manages, as well as reimbursement for certain shared group costs.

Management fees earned by LQM from the Managed Hotels, for the year ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were approximately $0.6 million. These management fees are included within franchise and other fee-based revenues in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

In addition, in accordance with the LQM Management Agreements, LQM also provides certain group services for Managed Hotels including group and administrative services, information systems support, training, and other field services and is reimbursed for the cost of providing these services. During 2012, LQM earned from Managed Hotels approximately $1.5 million of group services reimbursements. During 2011, LQM earned from Managed Hotels approximately $1.3 million of group services reimbursements. During 2010, LQM earned from Managed Hotels approximately $1.3 million of group services reimbursements. These fees are included within franchise and other fees-based revenues in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

 

F-30


Table of Contents

Other fees and funding

Brand management fund—We maintain the BMF on behalf of our franchisees and the hotel properties we own and manage, and we charge these hotels a fee of 2.5% of room revenue, which is then used by the BMF to fund national advertising promotions and campaigns (See Note 2). BMF fees collected from franchised and Managed Hotels, and the related expenses, are reflected as other revenues and expenses from franchise and managed hotels in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

Customer loyalty program—We administer Returns, and charge participating hotels a fee to administer the program equal to 5% of the Returns members’ eligible room rate per night. These fees are recorded within franchise and other fees-based revenues in the accompanying combined statements of operations. We recorded fees related to Returns from the Managed Hotels of approximately $0.7 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Trademark licenses—In accordance with our Management Agreements with the Managed Hotels, we charge a royalty fee of 0.33% of the Managed Hotels’ gross revenues. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, royalty fees charged to Managed Hotels, under these agreements, were approximately $0.1 million, respectively. This royalty fee is recorded within franchise and other fee-based revenues in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

Receivables from affiliates—As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, receivables from the parent company of the Managed Hotels, which is an affiliate of the Funds, were approximately $8.3 million and $7.9 million, respectively. These receivables occur in the ordinary course of business and are settled from time to time.

We also purchase products and services from entities affiliated with or owned by Blackstone. The fees paid for these products and services were approximately $3.3 million, $3.1 million and $1.9 million, during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Note 14. Commitments and contingencies

Environmental—We are subject to certain requirements and potential liabilities under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances, and regulations. Such requirements often impose liability without regard to whether the current or previous owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Although we have incurred and expect to incur remediation and other environmental costs during the ordinary course of operations, we anticipate that such costs will not have a material effect on our operations or our combined financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Litigation—We are also party to a number of other pending claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. We maintain general and other liability insurance; however, certain costs of defending lawsuits, such as those below the insurance deductible amount, are not covered by or are only partially covered by insurance policies, or the insurance carriers could refuse to cover certain claims in whole or in part. We regularly evaluate our ultimate liability costs with respect to such claims and lawsuits. We accrue costs incurred from defending litigation as they become determinable. We do not consider our ultimate liability with respect to any single claim or lawsuit, or the aggregate of such claims and lawsuits, to be material in relation to our combined financial condition, results of operations, or our cash flows taken as a whole.

 

F-31


Table of Contents

Casualty losses—We maintain insurance for property and casualty damage, subject to deductibles and policy terms and conditions, attributable to wind, flood, and earthquakes. We also maintain business interruption insurance.

In 2012, one of our hotels in Oklahoma and another in Ohio sustained damage from wind. In addition, four of our hotels in Missouri and five in Texas sustained damage from hail storms. Additionally, 23 hotels in Florida, Louisiana, Alabama, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York and Connecticut were impacted by hurricanes. In 2011, 28 hotels were impacted by winter storms in Texas, Arizona, New Mexico and Colorado. Finally, two of our hotels located in California and Wisconsin sustained damage from a fire.

We have filed insurance claims with our insurance carriers related to these casualty disasters. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we have a receivable due from insurance carriers for expected insurance proceeds of approximately $0.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for property damage, which is included within accounts receivable in the accompanying combined balance sheets. During 2012 and 2011, we recorded a loss of approximately $5.3 million and a gain of approximately $2.3 million, respectively, related to property damage which is included in other lodging and operating expenses in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

Tax contingencies—We are subject to regular audits by federal and state tax authorities. These audits may result in additional tax liabilities. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) is currently auditing the tax returns of one of our REITs and a Taxable REIT Subsidiary for the tax years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. We have concluded that the positions reported on the tax returns under audit by the IRS are, solely on their technical merits, more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination.

We believe that we have appropriately provided for taxes in the accompanying combined financial statements. Several factors drive the calculation of our tax reserves. Some of these factors include: (i) the expiration of various statutes of limitations, (ii) changes in tax law and regulations, (iii) issuance of tax rulings, and (iv) settlements with tax authorities. Changes in any of these factors may result in adjustments to our reserves, which could materially impact our combined financial statements.

Purchase commitments—As of December 31, 2012, we had approximately $32.0 million of purchase commitments related to certain continuing redevelopment and renovation projects and other contractual obligations.

Franchise commitments—Under certain franchise agreements, we are committed to provide certain incentive payments, reimbursements, rebates, and other payments to help defray certain franchisee costs. Our obligation to fund these commitments is contingent upon certain conditions set forth in the respective franchise agreement. Our franchise agreements generally require that, in the event that the franchise relationship is terminated, the franchisee is required to pay any outstanding balance owing to us, including the unamortized portion of any incentive payment. As of December 31, 2012, we had approximately $1.1 million in outstanding commitments owed to various franchisees for such financial assistance.

Long-Term Incentives—Certain members of our management and others associated with Blackstone (the “LTI Participants”) are eligible to receive long-term incentives evidenced by units (the “Units”) in LQ Services L.L.C. (“LQ Services”), which indirectly holds interests in the Company, which Units are intended to be treated as “profits interests” for U.S. tax purposes. Units are

 

F-32


Table of Contents

typically granted by our Chief Executive Officer, in consultation with Blackstone, to key employees upon hire. Unit levels may also be adjusted to recognize changing job responsibilities. All of the Units are subject to exit-based vesting and will vest on the date when there is a sale, transfer or disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Holdcos to an unaffiliated entity which results in distributions being payable to the holders of the Units (a “Liquidity Event”), subject to an LTI Participant’s continued employment on such date. The value in respect of Units is determined based upon the amounts received by Blackstone pursuant to a Liquidity Event, net of certain debt repayments and return of equity to Blackstone. As payments in respect of the Units are contingent on occurrence of a Liquidity Event, which is not assessed to be probable as of the date of the financial statements, no expense has been accrued or recognized for Units granted as of or for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, or 2010. Any expense that could result in respect of the Units would be recorded at the time of a Liquidity Event.

Note 15. Employee benefit plans

We maintain a deferred savings plan covering substantially all of our employees that qualify under Section 401(k) of the United States Internal Revenue Code. Our deferred savings plan has an employer matching contribution of 100% of the first 3% and 50% of the next 2% of an employee’s eligible earnings, which vests immediately. We paid employer contributions of approximately $1.7 million, $1.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively, during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Note 16. Segments

Our operating segments are components of the business which are managed discretely and for which discrete financial information is reviewed regularly by our chief operating decision maker to assess performance and make decisions regarding the allocation of resources. Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive Officer. Our operating and reportable segments are defined as follows:

 

 

Owned hotels—This segment derives its earnings from the operation of owned hotel properties located in the United States.

 

 

Franchise and management—This segment derives its earnings primarily from revenues earned under various franchise and management agreements relating to our owned, franchised, and managed hotels, which provide for us to earn compensation for the licensing of our brand to franchisees, as well as for services rendered, such as hotel management and providing access to certain shared services and marketing programs such as reservations, Returns, and property management systems.

Corporate and other includes revenues generated and operating expenses incurred in connection with the overall support and brand management of our owned, managed, and franchised hotels and operations.

The performance of our operating segments is evaluated primarily based upon Adjusted EBITDA, which should not be considered an alternative to net income (loss) or other measures of financial performance or liquidity derived in accordance with GAAP. We define Adjusted EBITDA as our net income (exclusive of non-controlling interests) before interest expense, income tax expense (benefit), and depreciation and amortization, further adjusted to exclude certain items,

 

F-33


Table of Contents

including, but not limited to: gains, losses, and expenses in connection with: (i) asset dispositions; (ii) debt modifications/retirements; (iii) non-cash impairment charges; (iv) discontinued operations; and (v) other items.

The table below shows summarized combined financial information by segment:

 

      2012     2011     2010  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Revenues

      

Owned hotels

   $ 734,547      $ 679,843      $ 642,990   

Franchise and management

     50,086        44,064        40,303   
  

 

 

 

Segment revenues

     784,633        723,907        683,293   

Other fee-based revenues from franchise and managed properties

     17,157        15,182        13,238   

Corporate and other revenues(1)

     88,870        76,178        67,661   

Intersegment elimination(2)

     (72,648     (63,726     (58,339
  

 

 

 

Total revenues

   $ 818,012      $ 751,541      $ 705,853   
  

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

      

Owned hotels

     285,974      $ 250,701      $ 232,058   

Franchise and management

     50,086        44,064        40,303   
  

 

 

 

Segment Adjusted EBITDA

     336,060        294,765        272,361   

Corporate and other

     (38,237     (36,376     (42,395
  

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

   $ 297,823      $ 258,389      $ 229,966   

 

 

 

(1)   Includes revenues related to our brand management programs and other cost reimbursements. The portion of these fees that are charged to our owned hotels, which totaled $51.1 million, $44.1 million and $40.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, are eliminated in our combined financial statements.

 

(2)   Includes management, royalty, intellectual property royalty fees, and other cost reimbursements totaling $72.6 million, $63.7 million, and $58.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, which are charged as a cost to our owned hotels and eliminated in our combined financial statements.

 

F-34


Table of Contents

The table below provides a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to EBITDA, and EBITDA to net income attributable to the Company:

 

      2012     2011     2010  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Adjusted EBITDA

   $ 297,823      $ 258,389      $ 229,966   

Fixed asset impairment loss

     (53,228            (11,612

Income from discontinued operations

     12,723        13,543        12,304   

Loss on retirement of assets

     (1,562     (2,168     (495

Gain (loss) related to casualty disasters

     (4,730     3,447        1,297   

Gain on extinguishment of debt, net

     1,192        11,451        40,494   

Off-cycle management bonus related to debt amendment

     (4,932              

Financing costs expensed as incurred

     (7,749     (1,668       

Other gains (losses), net(1)

     4,111        850        2,500   

Termination of long-term contract

            (5,152       

EBITDA

     243,648        278,692        274,454   

Interest expense

     (103,342     (51,986     (50,641

Income tax expense

     (3,283     (2,472     (2,588

Depreciation and amortization

     (172,787     (165,295     (155,242

Non-controlling interests

     4,810        4,574        2,845   
  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company

   $ (30,954   $ 63,513      $ 68,828   

 

 

 

(1)   Other losses, net primarily consists of loss on interest rate caps, net income (loss) attributable to the BMF (which, over time, runs at a break-even level, but may reflect a profit or loss from year to year), transaction tax audit assessments and litigation reserve adjustments.

The following table presents total assets for our reportable segments, reconciled to consolidated amounts:

 

      2012      2011  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Owned hotels

   $ 3,122,256       $ 3,218,744   

Franchise and management fees

     191,875         202,562   
  

 

 

 

Total segment assets

     3,314,131         3,421,306   

Corporate and other

     42,189         62,926   
  

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 3,356,320       $ 3,484,232   

 

 

The following table presents total capital expenditures for our reportable segments, reconciled to our consolidated amounts:

 

      2012      2011      2010  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Owned hotels

   $ 89,429       $ 85,278       $ 62,718   

Franchise and management fees

                       
  

 

 

 

Total segment capital expenditures

     89,429         85,278         62,718   

Corporate and other

     13,457         10,274         6,888   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 102,886       $ 95,552       $ 69,606   

 

 

**********

 

F-35


Table of Contents

La Quinta Predecessor Entities

Condensed Combined Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012

 

      2013     2012  

 

 
     (in thousands)  
ASSETS     

Current Assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 48,954      $ 40,813   

Restricted cash

     128,003        104,814   

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,734 and $4,888

     42,134        36,917   

Receivables from affiliates

     10,604        8,261   

Assets held for sale

     45,746          

Other current assets

     9,912        10,097   
  

 

 

 

Total Current Assets

     285,353        200,902   
  

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation

     2,773,176        2,940,128   

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization

     179,873        180,913   

Deferred costs, net of accumulated amortization

     14,033        11,407   

Restricted cash

     8,593        8,593   

Deferred tax assets

     3,030        3,090   

Other non-current assets

     9,889        11,287   
  

 

 

 

Total Non-Current Assets

     2,988,594        3,155,418   
  

 

 

 

Total Assets

   $ 3,273,947      $ 3,356,320   
  

 

 

 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY     

Current Liabilities:

    

Current portion of long-term debt

   $ 2,799,743      $ 61,292   

Accounts payable

     29,523        33,784   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     54,202        53,381   

Accrued payroll and employee benefits

     39,945        29,867   

Accrued real estate taxes

     20,798        20,002   

Liabilities associated with assets held for sale

     1,838          
  

 

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

     2,946,049        198,326   
  

 

 

 

Long-term debt

            2,838,673   

Other long-term liabilities

     14,942        15,489   

Deferred tax liabilities

     411        447   
  

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

     2,961,402        3,052,935   
  

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies

              

Equity:

    

Members’ equity

     323,768        315,255   

Noncontrolling interests

     (11,223     (11,870
  

 

 

 

Total Equity

     312,545        303,385   
  

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Equity

   $ 3,273,947      $ 3,356,320   

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed combined financial statements.

 

F-36


Table of Contents

La Quinta Predecessor Entities

Condensed Combined Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

 

      September 30, 2013     September 30, 2012  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

REVENUES:

    

Room revenues

   $ 585,294      $ 552,459   

Franchise and other fee-based revenues

     59,846        52,054   

Other hotel revenues

     13,650        12,655   
  

 

 

 
     658,790        617,168   

Brand marketing fund revenues from franchise and managed properties

     14,594        13,139   
  

 

 

 

Total Revenues

     673,384        630,307   

OPERATING EXPENSES:

    

Direct lodging expenses

     264,208        251,552   

Depreciation and amortization

     122,694        116,501   

General and administrative expenses

     49,724        50,575   

Other lodging and operating expenses

     39,666        36,448   

Marketing, promotional and other advertising expenses

     54,226        44,475   
  

 

 

 
     530,518        499,551   

Brand marketing fund expenses from franchise and managed properties

     14,594        13,139   
  

 

 

 

Total Operating Expenses

     545,112        512,690   
  

 

 

 

Operating Income

     128,272        117,617   

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES):

    

Interest expense, net

     (110,746     (66,892

Gain on extinguishment of debt, net

            1,192   

Other income (loss)

     1,057        (7,374
  

 

 

 

Total Other Income (Expenses)

     (109,689     (73,074
  

 

 

 

Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes.

     18,583        44,543   

Income tax expense

     (2,526     (1,906
  

 

 

 

Net Income from Continuing Operations, net of tax

     16,057        42,637   

Loss on Discontinued Operations, net of tax

     (6,303     (623
  

 

 

 

NET INCOME

     9,754        42,014   

(Income) loss from noncontrolling interests in continuing operations

     (1,106     4,233   

(Income) loss from noncontrolling interests in discontinued operations

              
  

 

 

 

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (1,106     4,233   
  

 

 

 

Amounts attributable to the Company

    

Income from continuing operations

     14,951        46,870   

Loss from discontinued operations

     (6,303     (623
  

 

 

 

Net Income attributable to the Company

   $ 8,648      $ 46,247   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Pro forma income from continuing operations data:

    

Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes

   $ 18,583      $ 44,543   

Pro forma provision for income taxes

     7,433        17,817   
  

 

 

 

Pro forma income from continuing operations

   $ 11,150      $ 26,726   

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed combined financial statements.

 

F-37


Table of Contents

La Quinta Predecessor Entities

Condensed Combined Statements of Equity (Unaudited)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

 

     

Members’

equity

   

Noncontrolling

interests

   

Total

equity

 

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Balance as of January 1, 2012

   $ 189,585      $ (6,490   $ 183,095   

Net income (loss)

     46,247        (4,233     42,014   

Capital contributions

     174,862               174,862   

Distributions

     (18,235     (424     (18,659
  

 

 

 

Balance as of September 30, 2012

   $ 392,459      $ (11,147   $ 381,312   
  

 

 

 

Balance as of January 1, 2013

   $ 315,255      $ (11,870     303,385   

Net income

     8,648        1,106        9,754   

Distributions

     (135     (459     (594
  

 

 

 

Balance as of September 30, 2013

   $ 323,768      $ (11,223   $ 312,545   

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed combined financial statements.

 

F-38


Table of Contents

La Quinta Predecessor Entities

Condensed Combined Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

 

                  2013                 2012  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income

   $ 9,754      $ 42,014   

Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     127,289        126,454   

Amortization of other non-current assets

     630        523   

Amortization of intangible assets

     901        961   

Gain on extinguishment of debt, net

            (1,192

Interest expense added to long-term debt

     39,525        19,035   

Amortization of long-term debt reduction

     (3,446     (3,446

Gain related to casualty disasters

     (1,254     (745

Write off of deferred incentive costs

     27          

Write off of non-current assets

            165   

Amortization of leasehold interests

     (449     (509

Amortization of deferred costs

     7,028        6,264   

Financing costs expensed as incurred

            7,749   

Loss on sale or retirement of assets

     47        155   

Impairment loss

     19,913        1,574   

Gain on sale from discontinued operations

     (7,694       

Deferred taxes

     24        23   

Loss on interest rate caps

     135        97   

Provision for doubtful accounts

     1,385        1,558   

Changes in assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts receivable

     (7,693     (15,179

Other current assets

     809        2,309   

Receivables from affiliates

     (2,343     313   

Other non-current assets

     (356     (1,701

Accounts payable

     (5,052     2,675   

Accrued payroll and employee benefits

     10,078        10,457   

Accrued real estate taxes

     1,571        3,231   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     1,027        6,558   

Other long-term liabilities

     1,163        1,357   
  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     193,019        210,700   

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Capital expenditures

     (82,979     (67,896

Increase in restricted cash

     (23,189     (66,752

Increase in investments

            (13

Insurance proceeds on casualty disasters

     2,808        1,394   

Purchase of intangible assets, net

     (103     (13

Repayment (payment) of franchise incentives

     (700     22   

Proceeds from sale of assets

     65,296          
  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (38,867     (133,258

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed combined financial statements.

 

F-39


Table of Contents

La Quinta Predecessor Entities

Condensed Combined Statements of Cash Flows—(continued) (Unaudited)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

 

      2013     2012  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Proceeds from long-term debt

            484,918   

Repayment of long-term debt

     (136,301     (747,630

Payment of financing costs

     (8,981     (22,246

Investment in interest rate caps

     (135     (97

Distributions to members

     (135     (18,235

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

     (459     (424

Members’ contributions

            174,862   
  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

     (146,011     (128,852
  

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     8,141        (51,410

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period

     40,813        90,857   
  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period

   $ 48,954      $ 39,447   
  

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

    

Interest paid during the period

   $ 68,355      $ 42,373   
  

 

 

 

Income taxes paid during the period, net of refunds

   $ 2,754      $ 2,247   
  

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL NON-CASH DISCLOSURE:

    

Capital expenditures included in accounts payable

   $ 920      $ 478   
  

 

 

 

Receivable for capital assets damaged by casualty disasters

   $ 2,127      $ 2,413   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed combined financial statements.

 

F-40


Table of Contents

La Quinta Predecessor Entities

Notes to Condensed Combined Financial Statements (Unaudited)

As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013

Note 1. Organization and basis of presentation

Organization

The accompanying combined financial statements include the accounts of Lodge Holdco I L.L.C. (“Holdco I”), Lodge Holdco II L.L.C. (“Holdco II”), Lodge Holdco III L.L.C. (“Holdco III”) (collectively herein, the “Holdcos” or “La Quinta Predecessor Entities”) and all related wholly-owned and majority owned subsidiaries. The Holdcos may also be referred to herein as “La Quinta”, “we”, “us”, “our”, or the “Company”.

Holdco I and Holdco II, Delaware limited liability companies, were formed on January 4, 2006. Holdco III, a Delaware limited liability company, was formed March 17, 2006. Since those dates, we have been owned and controlled by Blackstone Real Estate Partners IV L.P. and affiliates (“BREP IV”) and Blackstone Real Estate Partners V L.P. and affiliates (“BREP V”). BREP IV and BREP V are affiliates of The Blackstone Group L.P. (collectivity herein, the “Funds” or “Blackstone”).

We own and operate hotels, some of which are subject to a land lease, located in the United States under the La Quinta and Baymont brands, and franchise and manage hotels currently operating in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. As of September 30, 2013 and 2012, total owned, franchised, and managed hotels, and approximate number of associated rooms were as follows:

 

      September 30, 2013      September 30, 2012  
     # of hotels      # of rooms      # of hotels      # of rooms  

 

 

Owned—La Quinta(1)

     355         45,200         371         47,000   

Owned—Baymont(1)

                     12         1,300   

Joint Venture—La Quinta

     1         200         1         200   

Managed—La Quinta(2)

     14         1,700         14         1,700   

Franchised—La Quinta

     466         37,300         439         34,900   
  

 

 

 

Totals

     836         84,400         837         85,100   

 

 

 

(1)   See discussion of discontinued operations in Note 3.

 

(2)   These hotels are owned by affiliates of the Funds and are referred to herein as the “Managed Hotels”. (See Note 7).

Lodging operations are particularly sensitive to adverse economic and competitive conditions and trends, which could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We are contemplating participating in an initial public offering (“IPO”) by a newly formed holding company which will become our parent and anticipate completing certain transactions simultaneous with or prior to the effectiveness of the IPO including obtaining replacement financing or extension of our existing debt due in July 2014, and acquisition of the Managed Hotels and our parent will be a “C” corporation for Federal income tax purposes.

Basis of presentation and use of estimates

The accompanying combined financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted

 

F-41


Table of Contents

in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and are unaudited. We have condensed or omitted certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP. Although we believe the disclosures made are adequate to prevent the information presented from being misleading, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the combined financial statements and notes thereto for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010.

The accompanying combined financial statements and footnotes include LQ Management L.L.C. (“LQM”), a VIE, in which we have a significant variable financial interest, and are the primary beneficiary. LQM received no member or other capital contribution, or equity investment upon formation or thereafter. LQM’s sole purpose is to manage all of our day-to-day operations, as well as to provide day-to-day management of the Managed Hotels. In return for providing these management services, we and the Managed Hotels pay LQM a management fee and reimburse LQM for costs incurred on our behalf, and on behalf of the Managed Hotels, in accordance with management and service agreements in place. La Quinta is the primary beneficiary of LQM as the management and service agreements in place provide for La Quinta to reimburse LQM for its expenses in a manner that allows LQM to realize a reasonable profit. We have not provided financial or other support to LQM during the periods presented that we were not contractually required to provide, and LQM’s agreements with its vendors are structured as non-recourse to our general credit.

As of September 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, LQM’s assets and liabilities were as follows:

 

      2013      2012  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 4,338       $ 630   

Restricted cash

     8,193         8,193   

Receivables from affiliates

     57,539         58,214   

Other current assets

     4,408         4,021   

Property and equipment, net

     16,584         17,362   

Intangible assets, net

     395         413   

Deferred costs, net

     1,943           

Accounts payable

     23,989         26,920   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     25,652         25,975   

Accrued payroll and employee benefits

     39,551         29,464   

Capital lease obligation (related party)

     18,219         21,287   

 

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and, accordingly, ultimate results could differ from those estimates. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of full year performance because of the impact of seasonal and short-term variations.

All intercompany transactions have been eliminated. In our opinion, the accompanying combined financial statements reflect all adjustments, including normal recurring items, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim periods.

Note 2. Significant accounting policies and recently issued accounting standards

Revenue recognition—Revenues primarily consist of room rentals, franchise fees and other hotel revenues. We defer a portion of our revenue from franchisees at the time the franchise agreement is signed and recognize the remainder upon hotel opening.

 

F-42


Table of Contents

Room revenues are derived from room rentals at our owned hotels. We recognize room revenue on a daily basis based on an agreed-upon daily rate after the guest has stayed at one of our hotels. Customer incentive discounts, cash rebates, and refunds are recognized as a reduction of room revenues. Occupancy, hotel, and sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to the taxing authorities are excluded from revenues in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

Included in franchise and other fee-based revenues are franchise fee revenues, which primarily consist of revenues from franchisees for application, affiliation, royalty, reservations, and training, as well as fees related to our guest loyalty program (“Returns”). We recognize franchise fee revenue on a gross basis because we (1) are the primary obligor in these arrangements, (2) have latitude in establishing rates, (3) perform the services delivered, (4) have some discretion over supplier selection, and (5) determine the specification of services delivered. The different types of franchise fee revenues are described as follows:

 

 

Upon execution of a franchise agreement, a franchisee is required to pay us an initial fee. We recognize the initial fee as revenue when substantial performance of our obligations to the franchisee with respect to the initial fee has been achieved. In most cases, the vast majority of the initial fee is recognized as revenue when each franchise agreement is signed as, after that date, our remaining obligations to the franchisee are limited to (1) pre-opening inspections, for which we defer $2,500, and (2) if mandated by us or agreed to with the franchisee, pre-opening training and marketing support related to entry into the La Quinta brand, for which we defer $5,000. These amounts represent an estimate of the value provided to the franchisee related to the services provided, and are based on our experience with time, materials, and third-party costs necessary to provide these services. We recognize the remaining deferred initial fee as revenue when the franchised property opens as the remaining service obligations have been fulfilled.

 

 

For franchise agreements entered into prior to April 1, 2013, we collect a monthly royalty fee from franchisees generally equal to 4.0% of their room revenues until the franchisee has operated as a La Quinta for twenty-four consecutive months. Beginning in the twenty-fifth month of operation, the franchisee monthly royalty fee generally increases to 4.5%, with the franchisee having the opportunity to earn the additional 0.5% back via rebate by achieving certain defined customer satisfaction results.

For franchise agreements entered into on or after April 1, 2013, for new franchisees, we began charging a royalty fee from franchisees generally equal to 4.5% of their room revenues until the franchisee has operated as a La Quinta for twenty-four consecutive months. Beginning in the twenty-fifth month of operation, the franchisee monthly royalty fee generally increases to 5.0%.

 

 

We receive reservation and technology fees, as well as fees related to Returns, in connection with franchising our La Quinta brand. Such fees are generally recognized based on a percentage of the franchisee’s hotel room revenues or room count. We perform certain other services for franchisees such as training and revenue management. Revenue for these services is recognized at the time the services are performed.

Included in franchise and other fee-based revenues are management fees of approximately $1.7 million and $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which represent fees earned from hotels that we manage under long-term contracts with the property owners. Management fees from hotels include a base fee, which is generally a percentage of hotel revenues. (See Note 7).

 

F-43


Table of Contents

Other hotel revenues include revenues generated by the incidental support of hotel operations for owned hotels and other rental income. We record rental income from operating leases associated with leasing space for restaurants, billboards, and cell towers. Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the respective lease agreement.

Brand marketing fund revenues from franchise and managed properties represent fees collected from franchised and managed hotels related to maintaining our Brand Marketing Fund (“BMF”). LQM maintains the BMF on behalf of all La Quinta-branded hotel properties, including our owned hotels, from which national marketing and advertising campaign expenses are paid. Each La Quinta-branded hotel is charged a percentage of its room revenue from which the expenses of the fund are covered. The corresponding expenditures of the BMF fees collected from franchised and managed hotels are presented as other expenses from franchised and managed hotels in our combined statements of operations, resulting in no impact to operating income or net income.

Income taxes—The combined financial statements include taxable entities, limited liability companies, and REIT entities. Limited liability companies and REITs are not subject to federal income taxes at the entity level. For our taxable subsidiaries, we account for income taxes using the asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting purposes. For financial reporting purposes, income tax expense or benefit is based on reported financial accounting income or loss before non-controlling interests and income taxes related to our taxable subsidiaries. Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the temporary differences between assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting and the analogous amounts recognized for tax purposes using the statutory tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse, within the taxable subsidiaries.

Certain of our subsidiaries have elected to be treated as REITs for federal income tax purposes under the United States Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as REITs, these subsidiaries must meet all of the required organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that the REIT distribute at least 90% of its regular taxable income to its shareholders as dividends eligible for the dividends paid deduction. The REIT subsidiaries intend to adhere to these requirements. If the REIT subsidiaries fail to qualify as REITs in any taxable year, they would be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and might not qualify as REITs for the four subsequent taxable years. For this reason, one of our REITs formed taxable subsidiaries to hold certain assets that could otherwise adversely affect its REIT status. These taxable subsidiaries are subject to federal and state income taxes.

In connection with the IPO (See Note 1), our new parent would be subject to additional entity-level taxes that will be reflected in our financial statements. The unaudited pro forma income information gives effect to an adjustment for income tax expense as if we had been a “C” Corporation at the beginning of each period presented at an assumed combined federal and state income tax rate of 40%. This rate approximates the calculated effective tax rates for the periods presented.

Newly issued accounting standards

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2013-02. This ASU amends existing guidance by requiring companies to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required to be reclassified in its entirety to net

 

F-44


Table of Contents

income in the same reporting period. For amounts which are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, companies will be required to cross reference other disclosures that provide information about those amounts. We adopted ASU 2013-02 prospectively as of January 1, 2013. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or disclosures.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11 This ASU provides guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists in the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from disallowance of the tax position. We plan to adopt ASU 2013-11 prospectively as of January 1, 2014 and we are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this ASU will have on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or disclosures.

Newly adopted accounting standards

From time to time, new accounting standards are issued by the FASB or other standards setting bodies, which we adopt as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, we believe the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on its combined financial statements upon adoption.

Note 3. Assets held for sale and discontinued operations

During 2012, we began an exercise to identify hotel assets in our portfolio which, for a variety of reasons, we determined detracted from our brand. As a result of a tentative disposal list of hotels being identified, and the resulting change in assumed holding period for these assets, an impairment charge of $51.5 million was recognized as part of our annual testing for impairment of long-lived assets. However, the assets did not meet all of the criteria for classification as assets held for sale as of December 31, 2012.

During the second quarter of 2013, the disposal list was finalized, causing 44 of our hotels, including all 11 of our Baymont-branded hotels, to meet all of the criteria to be classified as assets held for sale. As such, these hotels were classified as assets held for sale, and the results of their operations have accordingly been presented within discontinued operations for all periods presented in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

During the third quarter of 2013, 27 of these hotels, including all of the Baymont-branded hotels were sold. As of September 30, 2013, the remaining 17 hotels are reflected in the accompanying combined balance sheet as assets held for sale.

 

F-45


Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2013, the carrying amount of the major classes of assets and liabilities for the assets held for sale is as follows:

 

      2013  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Current assets

   $ 790   

Property and equipment, net

     44,543   

Other non-current assets

     413   
  

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 45,746   
  

 

 

 

Current liabilities

   $ 1,121   

Non-current liabilities

     717   
  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   $ 1,838   

 

 

Subsequent to September 30, 2013, an additional 13 hotels were sold. Estimated closing costs of approximately $1.0 million are included as a reduction of assets held for sale in the accompanying combined balance sheets.

In accordance with the terms of our loan agreements, all proceeds associated with the sale of these hotels have been used to make principal payments on our long term-debt. (See Note 5).

The following table summarizes the operating results of the discontinued operations:

 

      For the nine months ended
September 30,
 
                 2013                 2012  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Hotel revenues

   $ 38,128      $ 41,251   

Direct lodging expenses

     23,329        25,991   

Other lodging and operating expenses

     3,836        3,899   
  

 

 

 

Operating income

     10,963        11,361   

Depreciation and amortization

     (5,047     (10,410

Impairment loss (see note 6)

     (19,913     (1,574

Gain on sale from discontinued operations

     7,694          
  

 

 

 

Loss on discontinued operations

   $ (6,303   $ (623

 

 

 

F-46


Table of Contents

Note 4. Property and equipment

The following is a summary of property and equipment as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

 

      2013     2012  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Land

   $ 808,960      $ 843,671   

Buildings and improvements

     2,613,239        2,720,351   

Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other

     360,272        356,566   
  

 

 

 

Total property and equipment

     3,782,471        3,920,588   

Less accumulated depreciation

     (1,018,785     (987,520
  

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

     2,763,686        2,933,068   

Construction in progress

     9,490        7,059   
  

 

 

 

Total property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation

   $ 2,773,176      $ 2,940,128   

 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment was $121.7 million and $121.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Construction in progress includes capitalized costs for ongoing projects that have not yet been put into service. With the exception of the joint venture operating a hotel in New Orleans, Louisiana and three other hotels, all of our hotels are pledged as collateral for our long-term debt. (See Note 5).

Note 5. Long-term debt

Long-term debt as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was as follows:

 

     Interest rate   

Maturity

date

 

September 30,

2013

   

December 31,

2012

 

 

 
             (in thousands)  

Current:

        

Holdco I Mortgage Loan

  LIBOR + 2.790%(1)                    (2)   $ 2,023,548      $ 56,250   

Holdco III Mortgage Loan

  (3)                    (4)     219,409        5,042   

Mezzanine Loans

  LIBOR + 9.0% to 13.9%(5)                    (6)     556,786          
 

 

 

Current portion of long-term debt

       $ 2,799,743      $ 61,292   
 

 

 

Long-term:

        

Holdco I Mortgage Loan

  LIBOR + 2.790%(1)                    (6)            2,092,864   

Holdco III Mortgage Loan

  (3)                    (7)            228,547   

Mezzanine Loans

  LIBOR + 9.0% to 13.9%(5)                    (6)            517,262   
 

 

 

Long-term debt

       $      $ 2,838,673   

 

 

 

(1)   As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the 30 day United States dollar London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) was 0.18% and 0.21%, respectively. Portions of the Holdco I Mortgage Loan, with principal totaling $1.12 billion, carry interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 0.55%. The remaining Holdco I Mortgage Loan balances, with principal totaling approximately $0.9 billion, are subject to a LIBOR floor of 1.0% plus spreads ranging from 3.891% to 6.803%. The total weighted average spread for the Holdco I Mortgage Loan was 2.790% as of September 30, 2013 and 2.664% as of December 31, 2012.

 

(2)   The modified terms of the Holdco I Mortgage Loan require us to make certain principal payments upon closing and quarterly beginning on the first scheduled loan payment date following September 30, 2012. Final maturity is July 2014.

 

F-47


Table of Contents
(3)   The interest rate for the Holdco III Mortgage Loan as of January 1, 2012 was LIBOR with a floor of 1.0% plus a spread of 4.0% and remained at this rate until initial maturity of July 6, 2012. The interest rate for the Holdco III Mortgage loan as of July 6, 2012 and through September 30, 2013 was LIBOR with a floor of 1.0% plus a spread of 4.5%.

 

(4)   Principal payments are required quarterly equal to the amount of excess cash flows, as defined, held in escrowed accounts over a specified floor.

 

(5)   The Holdco I Mezzanine Loans bear interest at LIBOR plus current payment spreads ranging from 1.0% to 2.15%, and deferred payment spreads ranging from 8.0% to 11.75%, payable at maturity. Any difference between current LIBOR and the LIBOR floor of 1% is deferred to maturity. The total weighted average spread for the Holdco I Mezzanine Loans was 11.590% as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

 

(6)   In accordance with the May 2012 amendment, the maturity date was extended to July 2014. No scheduled principal payments are required prior to the maturity date.

 

(7)   The original maturity date was July 2013; however, we exercised the remaining one-year extension option that permitted us, at our discretion, to extend the Holdco III Mortgage Loan’s maturity date to July 2014. Included in the Holdco III Mortgage Loan as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is an unamortized long-term debt reduction of $3,446 and $6,892 respectively, which is being amortized using an initial imputed interest rate of 3.45%.

Current maturities of long-term debt:

As of September 30, 2013, the long-term debt was scheduled to mature as follows (in thousands):

 

2013 (remaining)

   $ 15,625   

2014

     2,784,118   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 2,799,743   

 

 

All of our long-term debt matures on July 6, 2014. We do not expect to have sufficient cash on hand to pay the outstanding long-term debt balances expected to exist at that time in full. As such in connection with the IPO (See Note 1), we are engaged in discussions with lenders to obtain replacement financing or extension of our current debt facilities, and we believe we will be able to obtain acceptable new financing prior to the maturity of our current long-term debt.

Interest rate caps

Pursuant to the terms of the Loans and the Holdco III Mortgage Loan, we are required to maintain interest rate caps under certain defined conditions until the maturity date. The effect of the interest rate cap agreements is to limit our maximum interest rate exposure with respect to increases in LIBOR through the maturity date. We have purchased and maintained the required interest rate caps during the periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, and the related gain or loss on these investments is reflected within other income (loss) in the accompanying statements of operations.

As of September 30, 2013 and 2012, the interest rate caps we held are estimated to have no value. Management expects that, should it be necessary, the counter parties will fully perform under the terms of the interest rate cap agreements.

 

F-48


Table of Contents

Interest expense, net

Interest expense consisted of the following for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

Description    2013     2012  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Mortgage Loan

   $ 51,984      $ 29,897   

Holdco III Mortgage Loan

     9,238        9,199   

Mezzanine Loans:

    

Current

     6,774        6,285   

Deferred

     39,525        19,035   

Amortization of long-term debt reduction

     (3,446     (3,446

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     6,811        6,055   

Other interest

     18        17   

Interest income

     (158     (150
  

 

 

 

Total interest expense, net

   $ 110,746      $ 66,892   

 

 

Note 6. Fair value measurements

The carrying amount and estimated fair values of our financial assets and liabilities, which include related current portions, were as follows:

 

      September 30, 2013      December 31, 2012  
     Carrying
amount
     Fair value      Carrying
amount
     Fair value  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Cash and cash equivalents(1)

   $ 48,954       $ 48,954       $ 40,813       $ 40,813   

Restricted Cash(1)

     136,596         136,596         113,407         113,407   

Long-term debt(2)

     2,799,743         2,793,774         2,899,965         2,889,328   

 

 

 

(1)   Classified as Level 1 under the fair value hierarchy.

 

(2)   Classified as Level 3 under the fair value hierarchy.

We believe the carrying amounts of our cash and cash equivalents approximated fair value as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Our estimates of the fair values were determined using available market information and valuation methods appropriate in the circumstances. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair values. Proper placement of fair value measurements within the valuation hierarchy is considered each reporting period. Third-party information received for calculating Level 3 fair value measurements is reviewed to ensure it is in accordance with GAAP. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methods may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Restricted cash is primarily comprised of short-term interest-bearing money market funds with maturities of less than 90 days and time deposits. The estimated fair values were based on available market pricing information of similar financial instruments.

We estimate the fair value of our long-term debt using discounted cash flow analysis based on current market inputs for similar types of arrangements. The primary sensitivity in these calculations is based on the selection of appropriate discount rates. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 we estimated the discount rate to be approximately 5.2% and 5.0%, respectively Fluctuations in these assumptions will result in different estimates of fair value.

 

F-49


Table of Contents

We estimate the fair value of hotels classified as held for sale using the lower of cost or estimated fair value. The inputs used in determining the fair value are considered to be Level 2 and Level 3 within the fair value measurement hierarchy. Level 2 reflects our sales price as determined by contract with the buyer, less associated closing costs. Level 3 reflects our sales price as determined by contract with the buyer, less estimated associated closing costs.

The following fair value hierarchy table presents information of our hotels classified as assets held for sale measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2013:

 

September 30, 2013    Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total fair
value
     Impairment
charge
 

 

 
     (in thousands)  

1 La Quinta Inn and Suites

   $         —       $ 2,655       $       $ 2,655       $   

16 La Quinta Inns(1)

             34,835         7,053         41,888         8,845   
  

 

 

 
   $       $ 37,490       $ 7,053       $ 44,543       $ 8,845   

 

 

 

(1)   Within the fair value hierarchy, Level 2 is comprised of 12 hotels and Level 3 is comprised of 4 hotels.

The following fair value hierarchy table presents information of our hotels measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2012:

 

September 30, 2012    Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total fair
value
     Impairment
charge
 

 

 
     (in thousands)  

1 Baymont hotel

   $         —       $ 1,800       $       $ 1,800       $ 1,574   
  

 

 

 
   $       $ 1,800       $       $ 1,800       $ 1,574   

 

 

Note 7. Related party transactions

We maintain various agreements and enter into certain transactions with affiliates of the Funds. These affiliates own the 14 La Quinta-branded Managed Hotels which are managed by LQM. The following is a discussion of these arrangements and resulting transactions:

Management and service agreements

Hotel management agreements—Pursuant to hotel management agreements (“LQM Management Agreements”), LQM provides management services to the Managed Hotels, including supervision, direction, operation, management and promotion. The LQM Management Agreements will expire in July 2027, but may be terminated by either party at any time and for any reason. Under the terms of the LQM Management Agreements, LQM is entitled to recover a management fee of 1.67% of gross operating revenue, from hotels it manages, as well as reimbursement for certain shared group costs.

Management fees earned by LQM from the Managed Hotels, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively. These management fees are included within franchise and other fee-based revenues in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

In addition, in accordance with the LQM Management Agreements, LQM also provides certain group services for hotels it manages including group and administrative services, information systems support, training, and other field services and is reimbursed for the cost of providing these services. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, LQM earned group

 

F-50


Table of Contents

services reimbursements from Managed Hotels of approximately $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively. These fees are included within franchise and other fee-based revenues in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

Other fees and funding

Brand management fund (BMF)—We maintain the BMF on behalf of our franchisees and the hotel properties we own and manage, and we charge these hotels a fee of 2.5% of room revenue, which is then used by the BMF to fund national advertising promotions and campaigns. BMF fees collected from franchised and Managed Hotels, and the related expenses, are reflected as other revenues and expenses from franchise and managed hotels in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

Customer loyalty program—We administer Returns, and charge participating hotels a fee to administer the program equal to 5% of the Returns members’ eligible room rate per night. These fees are recorded within franchise and other fees-based revenues in the accompanying combined statements of operations. We recorded revenues related to Returns from the Managed Hotels of approximately $0.7 million and $0.5 million during nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Trademark licenses—In accordance with our management agreements with the Managed Hotels, we charge a royalty fee of 0.33% of the Managed Hotels’ gross revenues. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, royalty fees charged to the Managed Hotels under these agreements were approximately $0.1 million for both periods, respectively. This royalty fee is recorded within franchise and other fee-based revenues in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

Receivables from affiliates—As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, receivables from the parent company of the Managed Hotels were approximately $10.6 million and $8.3 million, respectively. These receivables occur in the normal course of business and are settled from time to time.

We also purchase products and services from entities affiliated with or owned by Blackstone. The fees paid for these products and services were approximately $2.4 million and $2.3 million, during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies

Environmental—We are subject to certain requirements and potential liabilities under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances, and regulations. Such requirements often impose liability without regard to whether the current or previous owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Although we have incurred and expects to incur remediation and other environmental costs during the ordinary course of operations, we anticipate that such costs will not have a material effect on our, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Litigation—We are also party to a number of other pending claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. We maintain general and other liability insurance; however, certain costs of defending lawsuits, such as those below the insurance deductible amount, are not covered by or are only partially covered by insurance policies, or the insurance carriers could refuse to cover certain claims in whole or in part. We regularly evaluate ultimate liability costs

 

F-51


Table of Contents

with respect to such claims and lawsuits. We accrue costs incurred from defending litigation as they become determinable. We do not consider our ultimate liability with respect to any single claim or lawsuit, or the aggregate of such claims and lawsuits, to be material in relation to our combined financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows taken as a whole.

Casualty losses—We maintain insurance for property and casualty damage, subject to deductibles and policy terms and conditions, attributable to wind, flood, and earthquakes. We also maintain business interruption insurance.

Tax contingencies—We are subject to regular audits by federal and state tax authorities. These audits may result in additional tax liabilities. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) is currently auditing the tax returns of one of our REITs and a taxable REIT subsidiary for the tax years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011. On January 9, 2014, we received a draft notice of proposed adjustment from the IRS in the amount of $158 million of additional tax for the periods under audit in which the IRS has preliminarily asserted that the rent charged for these periods under the lease of hotel properties from the REIT to the taxable REIT subsidiary exceeded an arm’s length rent. We have reviewed the draft notice from the IRS, considered its content, and intend to seek additional input from the IRS. However, we continue to believe that the positions reported on our tax returns under audit by the IRS are, based on their technical merits, more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. Accordingly, as of September 30, 2013, we have not established any reserves related to this draft proposed adjustment or any other issues reflected on the returns under examination.

We believe that we have appropriately provided for taxes in the accompanying combined financial statements. Several factors drive the calculation of our tax reserves. Some of these factors include: (i) the expiration of various statutes of limitations, (ii) changes in tax law and regulations, (iii) issuance of tax rulings, and (iv) settlements with tax authorities. Changes in any of these factors may result in adjustments to our reserves, which could materially impact our combined financial statements.

Purchase commitments—As of September 30, 2013, we had approximately $38.3 million of purchase commitments related to certain continuing redevelopment and renovation projects.

Franchise commitments—Under certain franchise agreements, we are committed to provide certain incentive payments, reimbursements, rebates, and other payments to help defray certain costs. Our obligation to fund these commitments is contingent upon certain conditions set forth in the respective franchise agreement. The franchise agreements generally require that, in the event that the franchise relationship is terminated, the franchisee is required to repay any outstanding balance plus any unamortized portion of any incentive payment. As of September 30, 2013, we had $0.4 million in outstanding commitments owed to various franchisees for such financial assistance.

Long-Term Incentives—Certain members of our management and others associated with Blackstone (the “LTI Participants”) are eligible to receive long-term incentives evidenced by units (the “Units”) in LQ Services L.L.C. (“LQ Services”), which indirectly holds interests in the Company, which Units are intended to be treated as “profits interests” for U.S. tax purposes. Units are typically granted by our Chief Executive Officer, in consultation with Blackstone, to key employees upon hire. Unit levels may also be adjusted to recognize changing job responsibilities. All of the Units are subject to exit-based vesting and will vest on the date when there is a sale, transfer or disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Holdcos to an unaffiliated entity which results in distributions being payable to the holders of the Units (a “Liquidity

 

F-52


Table of Contents

Event”), subject to an LTI Participant’s continued employment on such date. The value in respect of Units is determined based upon the amounts received by Blackstone pursuant to a Liquidity Event, net of certain debt repayments and return of equity to Blackstone. As payments in respect of the Units are contingent on occurrence of a Liquidity Event, which is not assessed to be probable as of the date of the financial statements, no expense has been accrued or recognized for Units granted as of September 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012 or for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. Any expense that could result in respect of the Units would be recorded at the time of a Liquidity Event.

Note 9. Employee benefit plans

We maintain a deferred savings plan covering substantially all of its employees that qualified under Section 401(k) of the United States Internal Revenue Code. Our deferred savings plan has an employer matching contribution of 100% of the first 3% and 50% of the next 2% of an employee’s eligible earnings, which vests immediately. We paid employer contributions of approximately $1.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively, during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Note 10. Segments

Our operating segments are components of the business which are managed discretely and for which discrete financial information is reviewed regularly by our chief operating decision maker to assess performance and make decisions regarding the allocation of resources. Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive Officer. Our operating and reportable segments are defined as follows:

 

 

Owned hotels—This segment includes all hotels that we wholly own or lease, as well as consolidated non-wholly owned entities, and derives its earnings from the operation of owned hotel properties located in the United States of America.

 

 

Franchise and management—This segment derives its revenues from fees collected pursuant to franchise and management agreements. With respect to franchise agreements, fees earned primarily relate to initial and ongoing revenues related to licensing our brand to franchisees located primarily in the U.S., Latin America and Canada, and also include fees for other services provided such as training, guest assistance, and revenue management. With respect to management agreements, fees earned relate to the performance of day-to-day operational management and promotion of our Owned Hotels and the Managed Hotels.

All intersegment revenues and expenses are eliminated.

Corporate and other includes revenues for certain cost reimbursements, and related expenses generated by and used in the overall support of our owned, managed, and franchised hotels.

The performance of our operating segments is evaluated primarily based upon Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), which should not be considered an alternative to net income or other measures of financial performance or liquidity derived in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is a commonly used measure in many industries. We adjust EBITDA when evaluating our performance because we believe that the adjustment for certain items, such as restructuring and acquisition transaction expenses, impairment charges related to long-lived assets, non-cash equity-based compensation, discontinued operations, and other items not indicative of ongoing operating performance.

 

F-53


Table of Contents

The table below shows summarized combined financial information by segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

      2013     2012  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Revenues

    

Owned hotels

   $ 601,504      $ 567,987   

Franchise and management

     42,232        37,870   
  

 

 

 

Segment revenues

     643,736        605,857   

Other revenues from franchise and managed properties

     14,594        13,139   

Corporate and other revenues(1)

     74,424        66,101   

Intersegment elimination(2)

     (59,370     (54,790
  

 

 

 

Total revenues

   $ 673,384      $ 630,307   
  

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

    

Owned hotels

   $ 246,171      $ 232,785   

Franchise and management

     42,232        37,870   
  

 

 

 

Segment Adjusted EBITDA

     288,403        270,655   

Corporate and other

     (32,188     (30,637
  

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

   $ 256,215      $ 240,018   

 

 

 

(1)   Includes revenues related to our brand management programs and other cost reimbursements. The portion of these fees that are charged to our owned hotels, which totaled $41.4 million and $38.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, are eliminated in our combined financial statements.

 

(2)   Includes management, royalty, intellectual property royalty fees, and other cost reimbursements totaling $59.4 million and $54.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These fees are charged to owned hotels and are eliminated in our combined financial statements.

The table below provides a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to EBITDA and EBITDA to net income attributable to the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

      2013     2012  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Adjusted EBITDA

   $ 256,215      $ 240,018   

Income from discontinued operations

     8,420        9,057   

Impairment loss

     (19,913     (1,574

Gain on sale from discontinued operations

     7,694     

Loss on retirement of assets

     (47     (155

Gain related to casualty disasters

     2,611        1,329   

Gain on extinguishment of debt, net

            1,192   

Off-cycle management bonus related to debt amendment

            (4,932

Financing costs expensed as incurred

            (7,749

Other losses, net(1)

     (3,034     1,324   
  

 

 

 

EBITDA

     251,946        238,510   

Interest expense

     (110,908     (67,042

Income tax expense

     (2,573     (2,019

Depreciation and amortization

     (128,711     (127,435

Noncontrolling interests

     (1,106     4,233   
  

 

 

 

Net income attributable to the Company

   $ 8,648      $ 46,247   

 

 

 

F-54


Table of Contents
(1)   Other losses, net primarily consists of loss on interest rate caps, net income (loss) attributable to the BMF (which, over time, runs at a break-even level, but may reflect a profit or loss from period to period), transaction tax audit assessments and litigation reserve adjustments.

The following table presents assets for our reportable segments, reconciled to consolidated amounts as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

 

      2013      2012  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Total Assets

     

Owned hotels

   $ 3,025,520       $ 3,122,256   

Franchise and management

     195,794         191,875   
  

 

 

 

Total segments assets

     3,221,314         3,314,131   

Corporate and other

     52,633         42,189   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 3,273,947       $ 3,356,320   

 

 

The following table presents capital expenditures for our reportable segments, reconciled to our consolidated amounts as of September 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

      2013      2012  

 

 
     (in thousands)  

Capital Expenditures

     

Owned hotels

   $ 70,625       $ 56,514   

Franchise and management

               
  

 

 

 

Total segment capital expenditures

     70,625         56,514   

Corporate and other

     12,354         11,382   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 82,979       $ 67,896   

 

 

**********

 

F-55


Table of Contents

Independent Auditors’ Report

To the Managing Member of

WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels:

We have audited the accompanying combined financial statements of WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels (the “Company”), which comprise the combined balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related combined statements of operations, changes in member’s equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, and the related notes to the combined financial statements. The combined financial statements include the accounts of La Quinta Inn—Fairfield, La Quinta Inn—Armonk, La Quinta Inn—Coral Springs, La Quinta Inn—Deerfield, La Quinta Inn—Sunrise, La Quinta Inn—Miami Lakes, La Quinta Inn—Naples, La Quinta Inn—Plantation, La Quinta Inn—Sarasota, La Quinta Inn—Wayne, La Quinta Inn—West Palm Beach, La Quinta Inn—Ft. Lauderdale, La Quinta Inn—Clifton, and La Quinta Inn—Elmsford. These entities are under common ownership and common management.

Management’s Responsibility for the Combined Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these combined financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of combined financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the combined financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the combined financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company’s preparation and fair presentation of the combined financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the combined financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

 

F-56


Table of Contents

Opinion

In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the period ended December 31, 2012, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Miami, Florida

December 23, 2013

 

F-57


Table of Contents

WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels

Combined Balance Sheets

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011

 

      2012      2011  

 

 
     (In thousands)  

ASSETS

     

CURRENT ASSETS:

     

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 27       $ 25   

Restricted cash

             2   

Accounts receivable—net

     1,565         1,356   

Inventory

     245         245   

Prepaid expenses and other

     273         190   
  

 

 

 

Total current assets

     2,110         1,818   

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT—Net

     88,725         88,778   

OTHER ASSETS

     101         434   
  

 

 

 

TOTAL

   $ 90,936       $ 91,030   
  

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY

     

CURRENT LIABILITIES—Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   $ 3,738       $ 2,322   

MORTGAGE LOAN AND MEZZANINE LOAN

     67,455         70,371   
  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     71,193         72,693   

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 6)

     

MEMBER’S EQUITY

     19,743         18,337   
  

 

 

 

TOTAL

   $ 90,936       $ 91,030   

 

 

 

See notes to combined financial statements.

 

F-58


Table of Contents

WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels

Combined Statements of Operations

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, AND 2010

 

      2012     2011     2010  

 

 
     (In thousands)  

REVENUE:

      

Room

   $ 35,328      $ 32,562      $ 31,390   

Retail and other

     488        510        678   
  

 

 

 

Total revenue

     35,816        33,072        32,068   
  

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

      

Room

     8,532        7,953        7,002   

Retail and other

     271        276        261   

Management, marketing and related party fees

     1,632        1,515        1,472   

Selling, general, and administrative

     14,102        13,966        13,288   

Depreciation

     4,450        4,678        4,690   
  

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     28,987        28,388        26,713   
  

 

 

 

(LOSS) GAIN ON DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

     (695     4          
  

 

 

 

OPERATING INCOME

     6,134        4,688        5,355   

INTEREST EXPENSE

     (1,551     (2,060     (2,195

GAIN ON EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT

            6,705          
  

 

 

 

NET INCOME

   $ 4,583      $ 9,333      $ 3,160   

 

 

 

See notes to combined financial statements.

 

F-59


Table of Contents

WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels

Combined Statements of Changes in Member’s Equity (Deficit)

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, AND 2010

 

      (In thousands)  

 

 

BALANCE—January 1, 2010

   $ 2,373   

Net income

     3,160   

Distributions

     (10,734
  

 

 

 

BALANCE—December 31, 2010

   $ (5,201

Net income

     9,333   

Contributions

     31,132   

Distributions

     (16,927
  

 

 

 

BALANCE—December 31, 2011

   $ 18,337   

Net income

     4,583   

Contributions

     2,916   

Distributions

     (6,093
  

 

 

 

BALANCE—December 31, 2012

   $ 19,743   

 

 

 

See notes to combined financial statements.

 

F-60


Table of Contents

WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels

Combined Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, AND 2010

 

      2012     2011     2010  

 

 
     (In thousands)  

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

      

Net income

   $ 4,583      $ 9,333      $ 3,160   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Depreciation

     4,450        4,678        4,690   

Gain on extinguishment of debt

            (6,705       

Loss (gain) on disposal of property and equipment

     695        (4       

Credit for bad debts

     (45     (25     (78

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     333        598          

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

      

Accounts receivable

     (164     86        622   

Inventory

            3          

Prepaid expenses and other

     (83     91        173   

Other assets

            (1     (87

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

     1,416        344        (96
  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     11,185        8,398        8,384   
  

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

      

Capital expenditures

     (5,092     (1,408     (987

Change in restricted cash

     2        54        (58
  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (5,090     (1,354     (1,045
  

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

      

Payments for deferred financing costs

            (931       

Distributions to Parent

     (6,093     (16,927     (10,734

Contributions from Parent

            10,816          
  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

     (6,093     (7,042     (10,734
  

 

 

 

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

     2        2        (3,395

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:

      

Beginning of year

     25        23        3,418   
  

 

 

 

End of year

   $ 27      $ 25      $ 23   
  

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION—Cash paid for interest during the year

   $ 1,223      $ 1,494      $ 2,193   
  

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH—Financing information:

      

Noncash contribution from Parent resulting from Parent’s paydown of the Company’s mortgage loan and mezzanine loan

   $ 2,916      $ 20,316      $   

 

 

See notes to combined financial statements.

 

F-61


Table of Contents

WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels

Notes to Combined Financial Statements

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, AND 2010

1. Organization and nature of operations

The accompanying financial statements are the combined financial statements of WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels (the “Company”). WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels is comprised of 14 hotel properties that are owned, directly or indirectly, by WIH Hotels, L.L.C. WIH Hotels, L.L.C. (or “Parent”) was formed on September 21, 2004, under the laws of the State of Delaware and is owned, managed, and advised by Blackstone Real Estate Partners IV, L.P., Blackstone Real Estate Partners IV TE.2 L.P., Blackstone Real Estate Partners IV F L.P., Blackstone Real Estate Partners IV TE.1 (DC) L.P., Blackstone Real Estate Partners IV TE.2 (DC) L.P., Blackstone Real Estate Partners IV TE.3-A (DC) L.P. and Blackstone Real Estate Holdings IV L.P., (collectively, the “Fund”) and their affiliates. The accompanying combined financial statements include the accounts of the following hotels:

La Quinta Inn—Fairfield

La Quinta Inn—Armonk

La Quinta Inn—Coral Springs

La Quinta Inn—Deerfield

La Quinta Inn—Sunrise

La Quinta Inn—Miami Lakes

La Quinta Inn—Naples

La Quinta Inn—Plantation

La Quinta Inn—Sarasota

La Quinta Inn—Wayne

La Quinta Inn—West Palm Beach

La Quinta Inn—Ft. Lauderdale

La Quinta Inn—Clifton

La Quinta Inn—Elmsford

Our parent or its subsidiaries are contemplating participating in a sale of our hotel properties to a subsidiary of La Quinta Holdings Inc. (“Holdings”), an affiliated entity, in connection with its initial public offering. The Company intends to use the proceeds of the public offering or debt incurred by Holdings to pay off the outstanding balances of the mortgage loan and mezzanine loan with respect to the Company prior to their maturity.

2. Summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation—The accompanying combined financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and

 

F-62


Table of Contents

disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the combined financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of cash in banks and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased.

Restricted cash—Restricted cash represents cash collected and held in restricted depository accounts or in escrow for the payment of property taxes and debt service under the mortgage arrangements.

Accounts receivable—net—Accounts receivable are primarily due from major credit card companies and other large corporations. A provision for possible bad debts is made when collection of receivables is considered doubtful. The allowance is estimated based on specific review of customer accounts, as well as historical collection experience and current economic and business conditions. The allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $62,000 and $49,000, as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Inventory—Inventory consists of unused operating supplies, which are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Provisions are made, as necessary, to reduce excess or obsolete inventories to their net realizable values.

Prepaid expenses—Prepaid expenses primarily consist of prepaid insurance, prepaid maintenance contracts, and prepaid advertising. Advertising costs are expensed when the advertisement is run.

Distributions to and contributions from Parent—Distributions to Parent or BRE/Prime Holdings LLC, a holding company also owned by WIH Hotels L.L.C., represent the cash generated by the Company that is transferred to the Parent through sweep arrangements under the provisions of the mortgage loan and mezzanine loan agreements discussed in Note 5. The Parent controls the sweep accounts and uses the cash in these accounts to pay down the mortgage loan and mezzanine loan. Contributions from Parent represent subsequent funding by Parent to pay the obligations, including operating expenses, of the Company. Additionally, any net cash position advanced to Parent is forgiven each year and therefore is accounted for as an equity distribution.

Property and equipment—net—Property and equipment were valued at acquisition based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Subsequent additions are recorded at cost. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs, and renewals of items that do not extend the service life or increase the capacity of assets are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures that increase the life or utility of property and equipment are capitalized. The Company recorded a loss on disposal of $695,000 in 2012 and a gain on disposal of $4,000 in 2011. The Company did not recognize a gain or a loss during 2010. Depreciation has been computed using the straight-line method using useful lives as follows:

 

      Years  

 

 

Building and improvements

     15–40   

Land improvements

     15–20   

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment

     3–10   

 

 

Long-lived assets and assets to be disposed of—Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may

 

F-63


Table of Contents

not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is determined by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying value of the assets exceeds such cash flows, the assets are considered impaired. The impairment charge to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their estimated fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or estimated fair value less costs to sell. Fair value is determined using management’s best estimate of the discounted net cash flows over the remaining life of the asset. No impairments of long-lived assets were recorded in 2012, 2011, and 2010.

Subsequent events—The Company has evaluated subsequent events through December 23, 2013, the date the financial statements were available to be issued.

Fair value of financial instruments—Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses are carried at cost, which approximates fair value based on their short-term or highly liquid nature. The outstanding balance of mortgage loan and mezzanine loan bears a variable interest rate and, accordingly, the carrying amounts approximate their fair value. As discussed in Note 5, the Parent entered into a loan modification agreement, which extended the maturity date of the mortgage loan and mezzanine loan.

Revenue recognition—Revenue associated with room rentals, retail and other sales at the hotels is recognized when services are rendered and goods are provided. Room revenue is generated by the rental of rooms and retail and other revenues from the sale of goods and other services provided by the hotels. Advance deposits arise as a normal part of business due to advance payments from hotel guests for accommodations. Such amounts are deferred until the related services are provided.

Income taxes—The WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels are limited partnerships for federal income tax purposes. As such, the income tax effects of the results of operations of the WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels accrue directly to the member. Accordingly, the accompanying combined financial statements do not include a provision for income taxes.

Fair value measurements—In accordance with the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures, the Company measures nonfinancial assets and liabilities subject to non-recurring measurement and financial assets and liabilities subject to recurring measurement based on a hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used to measure the fair value. Inputs used in determining fair value should be from the highest level available in the following hierarchy:

Level 1—Inputs based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access.

Level 2—Inputs based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted market prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3—Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability and typically based on an entity’s own assumptions as there is little, if any, related market activity.

The Company generally determines or calculates the fair value of financial instruments using quoted market prices in active markets when such information is available or using appropriate present value or other valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flow analysis, incorporating

 

F-64


Table of Contents

available market discount rate information for similar types of instruments and the Company’s estimates for non-performance and liquidity risk. These techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate, credit spreads, and estimates of future cash flows.

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels had assets that under certain conditions would be subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis, such as long-lived assets subject to fair value measurement when an impairment loss is recorded. Recognition of these assets at their fair value would be determined utilizing Level 3 inputs.

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, the Company did not have assets for which it recorded impairment. As a result, the Company did not have assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the years December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

3. Property and equipment—net

A summary of property and equipment as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, is as follows (in thousands):

 

      2012     2011  

 

 

Land and land improvements

   $ 17,936      $ 17,936   

Buildings and improvements

     84,258        82,574   

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment

     16,229        14,220   

Construction in progress

     679        54   
  

 

 

 

Total property and equipment

     119,102        114,784   

Less: accumulated depreciation

     (30,377     (26,006
  

 

 

 

Property and equipment—Net

   $ 88,725      $ 88,778   

 

 

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, was approximately $4.5 million, $4.7 million, and $4.7 million, respectively.

4. Accounts payable and accrued expenses

Accounts payable and accrued expenses as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, consist of the following (in thousands):

 

      2012      2011  

 

 

Accounts payable

   $ 1,279       $ 1,297   

Accrued payroll and related

     995         430   

Other accrued liabilities

     901         371   

Accrued sales, use and occupancy tax

     563         224   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 3,738       $ 2,322   

 

 

5. Mortgage loan and mezzanine loan

The WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels were acquired in a series of transactions. Mortgage and mezzanine loans were originated in connection with a financing involving the WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels and certain other properties. The total outstanding debt of the Parent and its subsidiaries with respect to such loans at December 31, 2012 and 2011, was $131.5 million and $137.6 million, respectively. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, $120.1 million and $126.1 million, respectively, represented the

 

F-65


Table of Contents

mortgage loan and $11.4 million and $11.5 million, respectively, represented the mezzanine loan. The 14 hotel properties have individual release price allocations. The portion of the loans associated with the assets being presented, and the related interest expense, represent the equivalent proportion with respect to the Parent and its subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage loan, mezzanine loan and interest expense amounts allocated based on each property’s release amount. The mortgage and mezzanine loans bear interest at the one-month London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread on a blended basis of 1.677%. On May 10, 2011, the Parent and its subsidiaries under the mortgage and mezzanaine loans entered into loan modification agreements with their lenders, which provided for the release of La Quinta Inn—Armonk from the mortgage loan. The loan modification further required that the La Quinta Inn—Armonk, La Quinta Inn—Clifton and La Quinta Inn—Elmsford secure the mezzanine loan only. In connection with this loan modification, a portion of the mezzanine loan was paid off at a discount resulting in a gain on extinguishment of debt. The portion of the gain attributed to the Company was $6.7 million. The amendment also extended the term of the loans for two successive one-year terms through May 10, 2013 and required the Parent to make quarterly principal payments of approximately $1.7 million through the final maturity date to be applied to the mortgage loan until fully repaid. The Company’s payments of this balance are reflected as distributions to Parent.

Cash flows from the mortgaged properties in excess of amounts due on the mortgage and mezzanine loans are required to be deposited into reserve accounts, and amounts released to the Company for operating expenses for the mortgaged properties are placed in restricted cash accounts which can be used as additional collateral to pay down the loans or certain other permitted uses.

Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage and mezzanine loans, the borrowers were also required to enter into an interest rate cap agreement with respect to each loan. An interest rate cap provides that a counterparty is obligated to pay any interest attributable to LIBOR over a set rate on a specified notional principal amount for a specific term. The value of the interest rate cap is not material at December 31, 2012 and 2011.

On May 9, 2013, the Parent and its subsidiaries under the mortgage loan and mezzanine loan entered into loan extension agreements, which extended the maturity date of the loans through June 11, 2013. On June 7, 2013, the Parent and its subsidiaries under the mortgage loan entered into the Third Modification of Loan Agreement and Omnibus Amendment and the Parent and its subsidiaries under the mezzanine loan entered into the Third Modification of Mezzanine Loan Agreement and Omnibus Amendment which, among other things, provide an extension of the maturity date of the mortgage and mezzanine loans through the payment date occurring in July 2014.

6. Commitments and contingencies

Insurance—The Company participates in a comprehensive insurance program on its properties, including liability, business interruption, fire, and extended coverage including windstorm and flood, in the types and amounts management believes are customary for the resort and hotel industry. Certain insurance risks for medical and workers’ compensation are self-insured by property management companies of the WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels (see Note 8) subject to certain stop-loss thresholds and therefore those property management companies direct bill medical, dental, and workers’ compensation costs to the hotel properties.

 

F-66


Table of Contents

Litigation—The Company is not a party to any significant litigation or claims, other than routine matters arising out of the ordinary course of business. The Company believes that the results of all claims and litigation, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s combined financial statements.

Leases—The Company leases land under agreements, expiring through 2030, that provide for monthly payments of rent and are accounted for as operating leases for financial reporting purposes. Future minimum lease obligations under various noncancelable operating leases with initial terms in excess of one year at December 31, 2012, are set forth as follows (in thousands):

 

Years ending

December 31

       

 

 

2013

   $ 936   

2014

     936   

2015

     936   

2016

     936   

2017

     936   

Thereafter

     8,438   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 13,118   

 

 

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, was approximately $1.4 million, $1.6 million, and $1.3 million, respectively.

7. Franchise agreement

The Company has franchise agreements, which became effective on April 11, 2006 and expire on April 11, 2026 with La Quinta Franchising, LLC (“La Quinta Franchising”). La Quinta Franchising is an affiliate of the Fund. Under the franchise agreements, the Company is required to pay a sales and marketing fee equal to 2.5% of the corresponding properties’ annual revenue and a royalty fee equal to 0.33% of the respective properties’ annual revenue upon opening under the La Quinta brand. Total sales and marketing and royalty fees were approximately $1.1 million, $0.9 million, and $1.0 million for 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, and were included in management, marketing and related party fees in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

8. Management of properties

On April 1, 2006, the Company engaged LQ Management LLC (“LQ”), a management company who primarily manages La Quinta franchised hotels, to provide hospitality management services to all of its limited-service hotels. LQ is an affiliate of the Fund. The hospitality management fee payable to LQ is based on 1.67% of the corresponding properties’ annual revenue. The hospitality management agreements expire on April 1, 2026, but may be terminated by either party at any time for any reason upon 30 days written notice.

Hospitality management fees under the agreements totaled approximately $0.6 million, $0.6 million, and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, and are reflected as a component of management, marketing and related party fee in the accompanying combined statement of operations.

**********

 

F-67


Table of Contents

WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels

Combined Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012

 

      2013      2012  

 

 
     (In thousands)  
ASSETS      

CURRENT ASSETS:

     

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 41       $ 27   

Restricted cash

     3           

Accounts receivable—net

     1,165         1,565   

Inventory

     242         245   

Prepaid expenses and other

     454         273   
  

 

 

 

Total current assets

     1,905         2,110   

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT—Net

     86,923         88,725   

OTHER ASSETS

     101         101   
  

 

 

 

TOTAL

   $ 88,929       $ 90,936   
  

 

 

 
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY      

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

     

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   $ 3,670       $ 3,738   

Mortgage loan and mezzanine loan

     62,271           
  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     65,941         3,738   
  

 

 

 

Mortgage loan and mezzanine loan

             67,455   
  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     65,941         71,193   

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 6)

     

MEMBER’S EQUITY

     22,988         19,743   
  

 

 

 

TOTAL

   $ 88,929       $ 90,936   

 

 

 

 

See notes to unaudited combined financial statements.

 

F-68


Table of Contents

WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels

Combined Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

 

      2013     2012  

 

 
     (In thousands)  

REVENUE:

    

Room

   $ 29,681      $ 26,706   

Retail and other

     343        371   
  

 

 

 

Total revenue

     30,024        27,077   
  

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

    

Room

     6,482        6,294   

Retail and other

     212        203   

Management, marketing and related party fees

     1,319        1,204   

Selling, general, and administrative

     10,751        10,403   

Depreciation

     3,639        3,331   
  

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     22,403        21,435   
  

 

 

 

GAIN ON DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

     114          
  

 

 

 

OPERATING INCOME

     7,735        5,642   

INTEREST EXPENSE

     (1,266     (920
  

 

 

 

NET INCOME

   $ 6,469      $ 4,722   

 

 

 

 

 

 

See notes to unaudited combined financial statements.

 

F-69


Table of Contents

WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels

Combined Statements of Changes in Member’s Equity (Unaudited)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

 

      (In thousands)  

 

 

BALANCE—January 1, 2012

   $ 18,337   

Net income

     4,722   

Contributions

     2,916   

Distributions

     (8,468
  

 

 

 

BALANCE—September 30, 2012

   $ 17,507   
  

 

 

 

BALANCE—January 1, 2013

   $ 19,743   

Net income

     6,469   

Contributions

     5,184   

Distributions

     (8,408
  

 

 

 

BALANCE—September 30, 2013

   $ 22,988   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See notes to unaudited combined financial statements.

 

F-70


Table of Contents

WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels

Combined Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

 

      2013     2012  

 

 
     (In thousands)  

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

    

Net income

   $ 6,469      $ 4,722   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation

     3,639        3,331   

Provision for bad debts

     6        64   

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts receivable

     394        90   

Inventory

     3        (1

Prepaid expenses and other

     (181     (177

Other assets

            333   

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

     (68     1,427   
  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     10,262        9,789   
  

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

    

Capital expenditures

     (1,837     (1,330

Change in restricted cash

     (3     3   
  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (1,840     (1,327
  

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

    

Distributions to Parent

     (8,408     (8,468
  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

     (8,408     (8,468
  

 

 

 

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

     14        (6

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:

    

Beginning of period

     27        25   
  

 

 

 

End of period

   $ 41      $ 19   
  

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION—Cash paid for Interest during the period

   $ 1,250      $ 1,223   
  

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH—Financing information:

    

Noncash contribution from Parent resulting from Parent’s paydown of the Company’s mortgage loan and mezzanine loan

   $ 5,184      $ 2,916   

 

 

 

 

See notes to unaudited combined financial statements.

 

F-71


Table of Contents

WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels

Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Unaudited)

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

1. Organization and nature of operations

The accompanying financial statements are the combined financial statements of WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels (the “Company”). WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels is comprised of 14 hotel properties that are owned, directly or indirectly, by WIH Hotels, L.L.C. WIH Hotels, L.L.C. (or “Parent”) was formed on September 21, 2004, under the laws of the State of Delaware and is owned, managed, and advised by Blackstone Real Estate Partners IV, L.P., Blackstone Real Estate Partners IV TE.2 L.P., Blackstone Real Estate Partners IV F L.P., Blackstone Real Estate Partners IV TE.1 (DC) L.P., Blackstone Real Estate Partners IV TE.2 (DC) L.P., Blackstone Real Estate Partners IV TE.3-A (DC) L.P. and Blackstone Real Estate Holdings IV L.P., (collectively, the “Fund”) and their affiliates. The accompanying combined financial statements include the accounts of the following hotels:

La Quinta Inn—Fairfield

La Quinta Inn—Armonk

La Quinta Inn—Coral Springs

La Quinta Inn—Deerfield

La Quinta Inn—Sunrise

La Quinta Inn—Miami Lakes

La Quinta Inn—Naples

La Quinta Inn—Plantation

La Quinta Inn—Sarasota

La Quinta Inn—Wayne

La Quinta Inn—West Palm Beach

La Quinta Inn—Ft. Lauderdale

La Quinta Inn—Clifton

La Quinta Inn—Elmsford

The Company’s mortgage loan and mezzanine loan mature in July 2014. The Company does not expect to have sufficient cash on hand to pay the outstanding debt balances expected to exist at that time in full. Therefore, the Company would be required to either extend or refinance its indebtedness. Our Parent or its subsidiaries are contemplating participating in a sale of our hotel properties to a subsidiary of La Quinta Holdings Inc. (“Holdings”), an affiliated entity, in connection with its initial public offering. The Company intends to use the proceeds of the public offering or debt incurred by Holdings to pay off the outstanding balances of the mortgage loan and mezzanine loan with respect to the Company prior to their maturity. The accompanying combined financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

F-72


Table of Contents

2. Summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation—The accompanying combined financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the combined financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of cash in banks and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased.

Restricted cash—Restricted cash represents cash collected and held in restricted depository accounts or in escrow for the payment of property taxes and debt service under the mortgage arrangements.

Accounts receivableNet—Accounts receivable are primarily due from major credit card companies and other large corporations. A provision for possible bad debts is made when collection of receivables is considered doubtful. The allowance is estimated based on specific review of customer accounts, as well as historical collection experience and current economic and business conditions. The allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $41,000 and $62,000, as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Inventory—Inventory consists of unused operating supplies, which are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Provisions are made, as necessary, to reduce excess or obsolete inventories to their net realizable values.

Prepaid expenses—Prepaid expenses primarily consist of prepaid insurance, prepaid maintenance contracts, and prepaid advertising. Advertising costs are expensed when the advertisement is run.

Distributions to and contributions from Parent—Distributions to Parent or BRE/Prime Holdings LLC, a holding company also owned by WIH Hotels L.L.C., represent the cash generated by the Company that is transferred to the Parent through sweep arrangements under the provisions of the mortgage loan and mezzanine loan agreements discussed in Note 5. The Parent controls the sweep accounts and uses the cash in these accounts to pay down the mortgage loan and mezzanine loan. Contributions from Parent represent subsequent funding by Parent to pay the obligations, including operating expenses, of the Company. Additionally, any net cash position advanced to Parent is forgiven each year and therefore is accounted for as an equity distribution.

 

F-73


Table of Contents

Property and equipmentnet—Property and equipment were valued at acquisition based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Subsequent additions are recorded at cost. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs, and renewals of items that do not extend the service life or increase the capacity of assets are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures that increase the life or utility of property and equipment are capitalized. Depreciation has been computed using the straight-line method using useful lives as follows:

 

      Years  

 

 

Building and improvements

     15–40   

Land improvements

     15–20   

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment

     3–10   

 

 

Long-lived assets and assets to be disposed of—Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is determined by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying value of the assets exceeds such cash flows, the assets are considered impaired. The impairment charge to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their estimated fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or estimated fair value less costs to sell. Fair value is determined using management’s best estimate of the discounted net cash flows over the remaining life of the asset. No impairments of long-lived assets were recorded in 2013 and 2012.

Subsequent events—The Company has evaluated subsequent events through December 23, 2013, the date the financial statements were available to be issued.

Fair value of financial instruments—Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses are carried at cost, which approximates fair value based on their short-term or highly liquid nature. The outstanding balance of mortgage loan and mezzanine loan bears a variable interest rate and, accordingly, the carrying amounts approximate their fair value. As discussed in Note 5, the Parent entered into a loan modification agreement, which extended the maturity date of the mortgage loan and mezzanine loan.

Revenue recognition—Revenue associated with room rentals, retail and other sales at the hotels is recognized when services are rendered and goods are provided. Room revenue is generated by the rental of rooms and retail and other revenues from the sale of goods and other services provided by the hotels. Advance deposits arise as a normal part of business due to advance payments from hotel guests for accommodations. Such amounts are deferred until the related services are provided.

Income taxes—The WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels are limited partnerships for federal income tax purposes. As such, the income tax effects of the results of operations of the WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels accrue directly to the member. Accordingly, the accompanying combined financial statements do not include a provision for income taxes.

Fair value measurements—In accordance with the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures, the Company measures nonfinancial assets and liabilities subject to non-recurring measurement and financial assets and liabilities subject to recurring measurement based on a hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used to

 

F-74


Table of Contents

measure the fair value. Inputs used in determining fair value should be from the highest level available in the following hierarchy:

Level 1—Inputs based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access.

Level 2—Inputs based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted market prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3—Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability and typically based on an entity’s own assumptions as there is little, if any, related market activity.

The Company generally determines or calculates the fair value of financial instruments using quoted market prices in active markets when such information is available or using appropriate present value or other valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flow analysis, incorporating available market discount rate information for similar types of instruments and the Company’s estimates for non-performance and liquidity risk. These techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate, credit spreads, and estimates of future cash flows.

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels had assets that under certain conditions would be subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis, such as long-lived assets subject to fair value measurement when an impairment loss is recorded. Recognition of these assets at their fair value would be determined utilizing Level 3 inputs.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not have assets for which it recorded impairment. As a result, the Company did not have assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

3. Property and equipment—net

A summary of property and equipment as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, is as follows (in thousands):

 

      2013     2012  

 

 

Land and land improvements

   $ 17,936      $ 17,936   

Buildings and improvements

     85,870        84,258   

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment

     16,849        16,229   

Construction in progress

     162        679   
  

 

 

 

Total property and equipment

     120,817        119,102   

Less accumulated depreciation

     (33,894     (30,377
  

 

 

 

Property and equipment—net

   $ 86,923      $ 88,725   

 

 

Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $3.6 million and $3.3 million, respectively.

 

F-75


Table of Contents

4. Accounts payable and accrued expenses

Accounts payable and accrued expenses as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, consist of the following (in thousands):

 

      2013      2012  

 

 

Accounts payable

   $ 1,185       $ 1,279   

Accrued payroll and related amounts

     1,103       $ 995   

Accrued real estate taxes

     759      

Accrued sales, use and occupancy tax

     383         563   

Other accrued liabilities

     240         901   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 3,670       $ 3,738   

 

 

5. Mortgage loan and mezzanine loan

The WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels were acquired in a series of transactions. Mortgage and mezzanine loans were originated in connection with a financing involving the WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels and certain other properties. The total outstanding debt of the Parent and its subsidiaries with respect to such loans at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, was $121.4 million and $131.5 million, respectively. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, $110.9 million and $120.1 million, respectively, represented the mortgage loan and $10.5 million and $11.4 million, respectively, represented for the mezzanine loan. The 14 hotel properties have individual release price allocations. The portion of the loans associated with the assets being presented, and the related interest expense, represent the equivalent proportion with respect to the Parent and its subsidiaries’ outstanding mortgage loan, mezzanine loan and interest expense amounts allocated based on each properties’ release amount. The mortgage and mezzanine loans bear interest at the one-month London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread on a blended basis of 1.677%. On May 10, 2011, the Parent and its subsidiaries under the mortgage and mezzanine loans entered into loan modification agreements with their lenders, which provided for the release of La Quinta Inn—Armonk from the mortgage loan. The loan modification further required that the La Quinta Inn—Armonk, La Quinta Inn—Clifton and La Quinta Inn—Elmsford secure the mezzanine loan only. In connection with this loan modification, a portion of the mezzanine loan was paid off at a discount resulting in a gain on extinguishment of debt. The portion of the gain attributed to the Company was $6.7 million. The amendment also extended the term of the loans for two successive one-year terms through May 10, 2013 and required the Parent to make quarterly principal payments of approximately $1.7 million through the final maturity date to be applied to the mortgage loan until fully repaid. The Company’s payments of this balance are reflected as distributions to Parent.

Cash flows from the mortgaged properties in excess of amounts due on the mortgage and mezzanine loans are required to be deposited into reserve accounts, and amounts released to the Company for operating expenses for the mortgaged properties are placed in restricted cash accounts which can be used as additional collateral to pay down the loans or certain other permitted uses.

Pursuant to the terms of the mortgage and mezzanine loans, the borrowers were also required to enter into an interest rate cap agreement with respect to each loan. An interest rate cap provides that a counterparty is obligated to pay any interest attributable to LIBOR over a set rate

 

F-76


Table of Contents

on a specified notional principal amount for a specific term. The value of the interest rate cap is not material at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

On May 9, 2013, the Parent and its subsidiaries under the mortgage loan and mezzanine loan entered into loan extension agreements, which extended the maturity date of the loans through June 11, 2013. On June 7, 2013 the Parent and its subsidiaries under the mortgage loan entered into the Third Modification of Loan Agreement and Omnibus Amendment, and the Parent and its subsidiaries under the mezzanine loan entered into the Third Modification of Mezzanine Loan Agreement and Omnibus Amendment which, among other things, provide an extension of the maturity date of the mortgage and mezzanine loans through the payment date occurring in July 2014.

6. Commitments and contingencies

Insurance—The Company participates in a comprehensive insurance program on its properties, including liability, business interruption, fire, and extended coverage including windstorm and flood, in the types and amounts management believes are customary for the resort and hotel industry. Certain insurance risks for medical and workers’ compensation are self-insured by property management companies of the WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels (see Note 8) subject to certain stop-loss thresholds and therefore those property management companies direct bill medical, dental, and workers’ compensation costs to the hotel properties.

Litigation—The Company is not a party to any significant litigation or claims, other than routine matters arising out of the ordinary course of business. The Company believes that the results of all claims and litigation, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s combined financial statements.

Leases—The Company leases land under agreements, expiring through 2030, that provide for monthly payments of rent and are accounted for as operating leases for financial reporting purposes. Future minimum lease obligations under various noncancelable operating leases with initial terms in excess of one year at September 30, 2013, are set forth as follows (in thousands):

 

Years ending

September 30

       

 

 

2014

   $ 936   

2015

     936   

2016

     936   

2017

     936   

2018

     936   

Thereafter

     7,502   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 12,182   

 

 

Rent expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, was approximately $1.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

7. Franchise agreement

The Company has franchise agreements, which became effective on April 11, 2006 and expire on April 11, 2026 with La Quinta Franchising, LLC (“La Quinta Franchising”). La Quinta Franchising is an affiliate of the Fund. Under the franchise agreements, the Company is required to pay a sales and marketing fee equal to 2.5% of the corresponding properties’ annual revenue and a royalty

 

F-77


Table of Contents

fee equal to 0.33% of the respective properties’ annual revenue upon opening under the La Quinta brand. Total sales and marketing and royalty fees were approximately $0.8 million and $0.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and were included in management, marketing and related party fees in the accompanying combined statements of operations.

8. Management of properties

On April 1, 2006, the Company engaged LQ Management LLC (“LQ”), a management company who primarily manages La Quinta franchised hotels, to provide hospitality management services to all of its limited-service hotels. LQ is an affiliate of the Fund. The hospitality management fee payable to LQ is based on 1.67% of the corresponding properties’ annual revenue. The hospitality management agreements expire on April 1, 2026, but may be terminated by either party at any time for any reason upon 30 days written notice.

Hospitality management fees under the agreements totaled approximately $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and are reflected as a component of management, marketing and related party fees in the accompanying combined statement of operations.

**********

 

F-78


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

La Quinta Holdings Inc.

Irving, Texas

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of La Quinta Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 17, 2013. This financial statement is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the balance sheet is free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall balance sheet presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such balance sheet presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of La Quinta Holdings Inc. at December 17, 2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Dallas, Texas

December 23, 2013

 

F-79


Table of Contents

La Quinta Holdings Inc.

Balance Sheet

As of December 17, 2013

 

   

ASSETS

  

Cash

   $ 1,000   
  

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

  

Commitments and Contingencies

       

Equity:

  

Common Stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000 shares authorized, 100 shares issued and outstanding

   $ 1   

Additional paid-in capital

     999   
  

 

 

 

Total Equity

   $ 1,000   

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this balance sheet.

 

F-80


Table of Contents

La Quinta Holdings Inc.

Notes to Balance Sheet

As of December 17, 2013

Note 1. Organization

La Quinta Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on December 9, 2013, and was initially capitalized with the issuance of 100 shares of common stock with $0.01 par value. The Company has had no operations since its formation. The Company plans to file a registration statement on Form S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the purpose of registering and issuing common stock (“IPO”).

If the IPO is successful, the Company will initially own and operate 353 hotels and own certain trade names and trademarks.

The accompanying balance sheet has been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United State of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

Note 2. Summary of significant accounting policies

Use of estimates—The preparation of the accompanying balance sheet in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the balance sheet. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Subsequent events—In connection with the preparation of the accompanying balance sheet as of December 17, 2013, the Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring after December 17, 2013, for potential recognition or disclosure through December 23, 2013, the date that the accompanying balance sheet was issued.

Note 3. Commitments and contingencies

Legal contingencies—The Company is not a party to any litigation or claims, other than routine matters arising in the ordinary course of business, that are incidental to the operation of the business of the Company. The Company believes that the results of all claims and litigation, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on its business or financial position.

Organizational costs and offering expenses—The Company’s organizational costs and offering expenses, other than selling commissions and underwriter fees, are paid by the predecessor entities on the Company’s behalf. Organizational costs and offering expenses include all costs other than selling commissions and underwriter fees to be paid by the predecessor entities in connection with the IPO. As of December 17, 2013, certain organizational costs and offering expenses are not recorded in the accompanying balance sheet because such costs are not a liability of the Company until completion of the IPO. When recorded, the organizational expenses will be expensed as incurred, and direct offering expenses will be charged to equity.

Note 4. Equity

On December 17, 2013, the Company issued 100 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, each at $10.00 per share to a subsidiary of The Blackstone Group L.P. Consideration for the shares was $1,000 of cash.

 

F-81


Table of Contents

                Shares

La Quinta Holdings Inc.

Common Stock

 

 

LOGO

 

 

J.P. Morgan

Morgan Stanley

 

 

Through and including                 , 2014 (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus), all dealers effecting transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to a dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with respect to an unsold allotment or subscription.


Table of Contents

Part II

Information not required in prospectus

Item 13. Other expenses of issuance and distribution.

The following table sets forth the estimated costs and expenses, other than the underwriting discount and commissions, payable by us in connection with the sale of the securities being registered hereby. All amounts shown are estimates except the SEC registration fee and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority filing fee.

 

Filing Fee—Securities and Exchange Commission

   $ 12,880   

Fee—Financial Industry Regulatory Authority

     15,500   

Listing Fee—                    

         *   

Fees and Expenses of Counsel

         *   

Printing Expenses

         *   

Fees and Expenses of Accountants

         *   

Miscellaneous Expenses

         *   
  

 

 

 

Total

         *   

 

 

 

*   To be filed by amendment.

Item 14. Indemnification of directors and officers.

Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, allows a corporation to provide in its certificate of incorporation that a director of the corporation will not be personally liable to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except where the director breached the duty of loyalty, failed to act in good faith, engaged in intentional misconduct or knowingly violated a law, authorized the payment of a dividend or approved a stock repurchase in violation of Delaware corporate law or obtained an improper personal benefit. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide for this limitation of liability.

Section 145 of the DGCL, or Section 145, provides, among other things, that a Delaware corporation may indemnify any person who was, is or is threatened to be made, party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of such corporation), by reason of the fact that such person is or was an officer, director, employee or agent of such corporation or is or was serving at the request of such corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise. The indemnity may include expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding, provided such person acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the corporation’s best interests and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was illegal. A Delaware corporation may indemnify any persons who were or are a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise. The indemnity may include expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit, provided such person acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not

 

II-1


Table of Contents

opposed to the corporation’s best interests, provided further that no indemnification is permitted without judicial approval if the officer, director, employee or agent is adjudged to be liable to the corporation. Where an officer or director is successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense of any action referred to above, the corporation must indemnify him against the expenses which such officer or director has actually and reasonably incurred.

Section 145 further authorizes a corporation to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise, against any liability asserted against him and incurred by him in any such capacity, or arising out of his or her status as such, whether or not the corporation would otherwise have the power to indemnify him or her under Section 145.

Our amended and restated bylaws will provide that we must indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized by the DGCL and must also pay expenses incurred in defending any such proceeding in advance of its final disposition upon delivery of an undertaking, by or on behalf of an indemnified person, to repay all amounts so advanced if it should be determined ultimately that such person is not entitled to be indemnified under our amended and restated bylaws or otherwise.

The indemnification rights set forth above shall not be exclusive of any other right which an indemnified person may have or hereafter acquire under any statute, provision of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our amended and restated bylaws, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.

We expect to maintain standard policies of insurance that provide coverage (1) to our directors and officers against loss rising from claims made by reason of breach of duty or other wrongful act and (2) to us with respect to indemnification payments that we may make to such directors and officers.

The proposed form of Underwriting Agreement to be filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this Registration Statement provides for indemnification to our directors and officers by the underwriters against certain liabilities.

We intend to enter into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers. These agreements require or will require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to us, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors or executive officers, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy and is therefore unenforceable.

Item 15. Recent sales of unregistered securities.

None.

Item 16. Financial statements and exhibits.

(a) See Page F-1 for an index of the financial statements that are being filed as part of this registration statement on Form S-1.

(b) Following is a list of exhibits being filed as part of this registration statement on Form S-1.

 

II-2


Table of Contents

Exhibit index

 

Exhibit No.      Description

 

 

  1.1   

Form of Underwriting Agreement

  3.1      

Certificate of Incorporation of La Quinta Holdings Inc.

  3.2   

Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of La Quinta Holdings Inc.

  3.3      

Bylaws of La Quinta Holdings Inc.

  3.4   

Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of La Quinta Holdings Inc.

  5.1   

Opinion of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

  10.1   

Form of Stockholders’ Agreement

  10.2   

Form of Registration Rights Agreement

  10.3   

Form of Omnibus Incentive Plan

  10.4   

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated September 30, 2003, between La Quinta Corporation and Wayne B. Goldberg

  10.5   

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated November 9, 2005, between La Quinta Corporation and Wayne B. Goldberg

  10.6   

Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated January 25, 2006, between LQ Management L.L.C. and Wayne B. Goldberg

  10.7   

Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of L.Q. Services L.L.C.

  21.1   

List of Subsidiaries

  23.1   

Consent of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP (included in the opinion filed as Exhibit 5.1)

  23.2      

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP as to Lodge Holdco I L.L.C. and subsidiaries, Lodge Holdco II L.L.C. and subsidiaries and Lodge Holdco III L.L.C. and subsidiaries

  23.3      

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP as to WIH La Quinta Inn Hotels

  23.4      

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP as to La Quinta Holdings Inc.

  23.5      

Consent of Alan J. Bowers to be named as a director nominee

  23.6      

Consent of Henry G. Cisneros to be named as a director nominee

  23.7      

Consent of Michael Nash to be named as a director nominee

  23.8      

Consent of Mitesh B. Shah to be named as a director nominee

  23.9      

Consent of Gary M. Sumers to be named as a director nominee

  24.1      

Power of Attorney (included in the signature pages to this Registration Statement)

 

 

 

*   To be filed by amendment.


Table of Contents

Item 37. Undertakings.

(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting agreement, certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.

(b) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of their counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such indemnification by them is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

(c) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:

 

(1)   For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b) (1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.

 

(2)   For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.


Table of Contents

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the registrant, has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Irving, Texas, on February 10, 2014.

 

La Quinta Holdings Inc.
By:  

/s/ Wayne B. Goldberg

 

Name: Wayne B. Goldberg

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Power of attorney

The undersigned directors and officers of the registrant hereby constitute and appoint Wayne B. Goldberg, Keith A. Cline and Mark M. Chloupek, and each of them, any of whom may act without joinder of the other, the individual’s true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for the person and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign this Registration Statement and any or all amendments, including post-effective amendments to the Registration Statement, including a prospectus or an amended prospectus therein and any Registration Statement for the same offering that is to be effective upon filing pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, and all other documents in connection therewith to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact as agents or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement and power of attorney have been signed by the following persons in the capacities indicated on February 10, 2014.

 

Signature

  

Capacity

/s/ Wayne B. Goldberg

Wayne B. Goldberg

  

President and Chief Executive Officer and Director

(principal executive officer)

/s/ Keith A. Cline

Keith A. Cline

  

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)

/s/ James H. Forson

James H. Forson

  

Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

(principal accounting officer)

/s/ Glenn Alba

Glenn Alba

   Director

/s/ William J. Stein

William J. Stein

   Director