Attached files

file filename
8-K - FORM 8-K - Yankee Holding Corp.d547786d8k.htm

Exhibit 99.1

Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA:

In addition to the results reported in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”), The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. (the “Company”) has provided information regarding “Adjusted EBITDA,” as defined, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings/loss from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization adjusted for the effects of equity-based compensation, Madison Dearborn Capital Partners, L.L.C. (“Madison Dearborn”) advisory fees, purchase accounting, restructuring, loss on debt extinguishment, realized (gains) losses on foreign currency transactions, loss on store closings and certain non-recurring expenses. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to represent cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP and should not be used as an alternative to net income (loss) as an indicator of operating performance or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. We believe the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors regarding our results of operations because such presentation assists in analyzing and benchmarking the performance value of our business. We believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors because it helps enable investors to evaluate our business in the same manner as our management evaluates our business, and because this measure is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies with substantial financial leverage. In addition, because Adjusted EBITDA facilitates internal comparisons of our historical operating performance on a more consistent basis, we also use Adjusted EBITDA for business planning purposes, to incent and compensate our management personnel and to measure our performance relative to that of our competitors. While Adjusted EBITDA is frequently used as a measure of operating performance and the ability to meet debt service requirements, it is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the method of calculation. In evaluating our operating performance these measures should be used in conjunction with GAAP measures:

 

    Fifty-Two Weeks
Ended
January 1,
2011
    Fifty-Two Weeks
Ended
December 31,

2011
    Fifty-Two Weeks
Ended
December 29,

2012
    Thirteen
Weeks
Ended
March  31,

2012
    Thirteen
Weeks
Ended
March  30,

2013
    Fifty-Two Weeks
Ended
March 30,

2013
 
    (in thousands)  
    (unaudited)  

Net income (loss)

  $ 41,909      $ 54,547      $ 56,323      $ (3,513   $ (1,733   $ 58,103   

Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

    379        262        134        43        24        115   

Income tax provision for (benefit from) continuing operations

    23,688        30,497        33,533        (1,921     (248     35,206   

Interest expense, net-excluding amortization of deferred financing fees

    79,798        60,048        59,700        14,637        13,651        58,714   

Amortization of financing fees

    4,840        4,093        4,595        1,039        1,065        4,621   

Depreciation and amortization

    38,135        37,576        27,302        7,562        6,562        26,302   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

EBITDA from continuing operations

    188,749        187,023        181,587        17,847        19,321        183,061   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity-based compensation

    962        3,920        753        203        159        709   


    Fifty-Two Weeks
Ended
January 1,
2011
    Fifty-Two Weeks
Ended
December 31,

2011
    Fifty-Two Weeks
Ended
December 29,

2012
    Thirteen
Weeks
Ended
March  31,

2012
    Thirteen
Weeks
Ended
March  30,

2013
    Fifty-Two Weeks
Ended
March 30,

2013
 

Madison Dearborn advisory fees

    1,500        1,500        1,500        375        375        1,500   

Purchase accounting

    1,283        929        1,420        531        140        1,029   

Restructuring costs(1)

    829        —          1,725        655        764        1,834   

Loss on extinguishment of debt

    —          —          13,376        —          79        13,455   

Realized losses (gains) on foreign currency

    384        (187     772        438        (45     289   

Loss on store closings

    194        145        361        29        —          332   

Estimated impact of certain non-recurring events (2)

    —          —          4,722        52        310        4,980   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

    193,901        193,330        206,216        20,130        21,103        207,189   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) Restructuring costs include severance, lease terminations and other costs associated with the restructuring of our business.
(2) Includes for the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2012, the thirteen weeks ended March 31, 2012 and the thirteen weeks ended March 30, 2013: (i) $2.9 million, $0.05 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of identified non-recurring costs related to the implementation of our new European enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system and warehouse moving costs, (ii) $1.5 million, $0 and $0, respectively, of negative impact on EBITDA from continuing operations from our international segment estimated by our management to be due to estimated lost sales resulting from disruptions caused by implementation of the ERP system, using an assumed revenue growth rate over the revenue in the prior-year period based upon the year to date revenue growth rate prior to implementation of the ERP system, and (iii) $0.3 million, $0 and $0, respectively, of negative impact on EBITDA from continuing operations estimated by our management to be due to estimated lost sales in our fundraising segment caused by Hurricane Sandy, using an assumed revenue growth rate over the revenue in the prior year period based upon the year to date revenue growth rate prior to the hurricane.