Attached files
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from _____________ to _____________
Commission File Number: 0-50347
| JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. |
| (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
|
Tennessee
|
45-0508261
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
120 Evans Avenue, Morristown, Tennessee
|
37814
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (423) 586-8421
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
Title of each class
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer o
Non-accelerated Filer o Smaller Reporting Company x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 16b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates was $14,016,241 million, based upon the closing price ($2.31 per share) as quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (December 30, 2011).
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of September 12, 2012 was 6,629,753.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.
INDEX
| Page | ||
|
1
|
||
|
16
|
||
|
20
|
||
|
20
|
||
|
20
|
||
|
20
|
|
20
|
||
|
23
|
||
|
24
|
||
|
42
|
||
|
43
|
||
|
43
|
||
|
44
|
||
|
44
|
|
44
|
||
|
44
|
||
|
44
|
||
|
45
|
||
|
45
|
i
Note on Forward Looking Statements:
This report, as well as other written communications made from time to time by Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) and subsidiaries and oral communications made from time to time by authorized officers of the Company, may contain statements relating to the future results of the Company (including certain projections, such as earnings projections, necessary tax provisions, and business trends) that are considered “forward looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”). Such forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as “intend,” “believe,” “expect,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated,” and “potential.” For these statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the PSLRA. The Company’s ability to predict future results is inherently uncertain and the Company cautions you that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated in any forward-looking statement. These factors include but are not limited to:
|
•
|
The strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which the Company conducts its operations which may be less favorable than expected and may result in, among other things, a deterioration in the credit quality and value of the Company’s assets;
|
|
•
|
The economic impact of past and any future terrorist attacks, acts of war or threats thereof and the response of the United States to any such threats and attacks;
|
|
•
|
The effects of, and changes in, federal, state and local laws, regulations and policies affecting banking, securities, insurance and monetary and financial matters;
|
|
•
|
The effects of changes in interest rates (including the effects of changes in the rate of prepayments of the Company’s assets) and the policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System;
|
|
•
|
The ability of the Company to compete with other financial institutions as effectively as the Company currently intends due to increases in competitive pressures in the financial services sector;
|
|
•
|
The inability of the Company to obtain new customers and to retain existing customers;
|
|
•
|
The timely development and acceptance of products and services, including products and services offered through alternative delivery channels such as the Internet;
|
|
•
|
Technological changes implemented by the Company and by other parties, including third party vendors, which may be more difficult or more expensive than anticipated or which may have unforeseen consequences to the Company and its customers;
|
|
|
•
|
The ability of the Company to develop and maintain secure and reliable electronic systems;
|
|
•
|
The ability of the Company to retain key executives and employees and the difficulty that the Company may experience in replacing key executives and employees in an effective manner;
|
|
•
|
Consumer spending and saving habits which may change in a manner that affects the Company’s business adversely;
|
|
•
|
Business combinations and the integration of acquired businesses which may be more difficult or expensive than expected;
|
|
•
|
The costs, effects and outcomes of existing or future litigation;
|
|
•
|
Changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by state and federal regulatory agencies and the Financial Accounting Standards Board; and
|
|
•
|
The ability of the Company to manage the risks associated with the foregoing as well as anticipated.
|
Additional factors that may affect our results are discussed in this annual report on Form 10-K under “Item 1A, Risk Factors.” These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. The Company does not undertake and specifically disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.
ii
|
ITEM 1.
|
General
Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. (also referred to herein as the “Company” or “Jefferson Bancshares”) is the holding company for Jefferson Federal Bank.
On October 31, 2008, the Company completed its acquisition of State of Franklin Bancshares, Inc. (“State of Franklin Bancshares”). The merger was consummated pursuant to the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 4, 2008 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and between the Company and State of Franklin Bancshares. In accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, shares of State of Franklin Bancshares were converted into either $10.00 in cash or 1.1287 shares of Company common stock. The total merger consideration consisted of approximately $4.3 million in cash and 736,000 shares of Company common stock.
In connection with the Company’s acquisition of State of Franklin Bancshares, Jefferson Federal Bank merged with and into State of Franklin Savings Bank, the wholly owned subsidiary of State of Franklin Bancshares. The resulting institution continues to operate as a Tennessee chartered savings bank under the name “Jefferson Federal Bank” (also referred to herein as the “Bank” or “Jefferson Federal”).
Management of the Company and the Bank are substantially similar and the Company neither owns nor leases any property, but instead uses the premises, equipment and furniture of the Bank. Accordingly, the information set forth in this report, including the consolidated financial statements and related financial data, relates primarily to the Bank.
Jefferson Federal operates as a community-oriented financial institution offering traditional financial services to consumers and businesses in its market area. Jefferson Federal attracts deposits from the general public and uses those funds to originate loans, most of which it holds for investment.
Available Information
We maintain an Internet website at http://www.jeffersonfederal.com. We make available our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and other information related to us, free of charge, on this site as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file those documents with, or otherwise furnish them to, the Securities Exchange Commission. Our Internet website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this annual report on Form 10-K.
Market Area
We are headquartered in Morristown, Tennessee, which is situated approximately 40 miles northeast of Knoxville, Tennessee in the northeastern section of the state. We consider our primary market areas to consist of: (i) Hamblen County, Tennessee, and its contiguous counties; (ii) Knoxville, Tennessee, and its surrounding areas; and (iii) the greater Johnson City, Tennessee, Kingsport, Tennessee, and Virginia region (the “Tri-Cities region”).
We currently operate two full-service branch offices and two limited-service drive-through facilities in Hamblen County, Tennessee. The economy of Hamblen County, which has an estimated population of 62,000, is primarily oriented to manufacturing and agriculture. Morristown and Hamblen County also serve as a hub for retail shopping and medical services for a number of surrounding rural counties. The manufacturing sector is focused on three types of products: automotive and heavy equipment components; plastics, paper and corrugated products; and furniture. According to published statistics, the unemployment rate in Hamblen County was 10.1% as of June 2012, the most recent period for which data is available, which was above the national and state unemployment rates at that time.
1
We also currently operate two full-service branch offices in Knoxville, Tennessee. Knoxville’s population is approximately 183,000 and its economy is largely fueled by the location of the main campus of the University of Tennessee, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, the National Transportation Research Center and the Tennessee Valley Authority. Additionally, Knoxville has many warehousing and distribution companies because of its central location in the eastern half of the United States. The unemployment rate for the Knoxville metropolitan statistical area was 7.0% as of June 2012, which was below the national and state unemployment rates at that time.
As a result of our acquisition of State of Franklin Bancshares in October 2008, we also currently operate six full-service branch offices in the Tri-Cities region. The population of the Tri-Cities region is approximately 500,000 and its economy is largely fueled by manufacturing and trade services. The unemployment rate for the Tri-Cities region combined statistical area was 7.9% as of June 2012, which was slightly below the national and state unemployment rates at that time.
Competition
We face significant competition for the attraction of deposits and origination of loans. Our most direct competition for deposits has historically come from the several financial institutions operating in our market area and, to a lesser extent, from other financial service companies, such as brokerage firms, credit unions and insurance companies. We also face competition for investors’ funds from money market funds and other corporate and government securities. At June 30, 2011, which is the most recent date for which data is available from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, we held: (i) 22.66% of the deposits in Hamblen County, which is the largest market share out of 10 financial institutions with offices in the county at that date; (ii) 0.32% of the deposits in the Knoxville, Tennessee, metropolitan statistical area, which is the 27th largest market share out of 44 financial institutions with offices in the metropolitan statistical area at that date; (iii) 4.96% of the deposits in the Johnson City, Tennessee metropolitan statistical area, which is the ninth largest market share out of 23 financial institutions located in the metropolitan statistical area at that date; and (iv) 1.27% of the deposits in the Kingsport, Tennessee-Bristol, Virginia metropolitan statistical area, which is the 18th largest market share out of 31 financial institutions located in the metropolitan statistical area at that date. Banks owned by SunTrust Banks, Inc., First Tennessee National Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation and other large regional bank holding companies also operate in our primary market areas. These institutions are significantly larger than us and, therefore, have significantly greater resources.
Our competition for loans comes primarily from financial institutions in our market area, and to a lesser extent from other financial service providers, such as mortgage companies and mortgage brokers. Competition for loans also comes from non-depository financial service companies, such as insurance companies, securities companies and specialty finance companies.
We expect to continue to face significant competition in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. Technological advances, for example, have lowered barriers to entry, allowed banks to expand their geographic reach by providing services over the Internet and made it possible for non-depository institutions to offer products and services that traditionally have been provided by banks. Federal law permits affiliation among banks, securities firms and insurance companies, which promotes a competitive environment in the financial services industry. Competition for deposits and the origination of loans could limit our growth in the future.
Lending Activities
General. Our loan portfolio consists of a variety of mortgage, commercial and consumer loans. As a community-oriented financial institution, we try to meet the borrowing needs of consumers and businesses in our market area. Mortgage loans constitute a significant majority of the portfolio, and commercial mortgage loans are the largest segment in that category.
2
One- to Four-Family Residential Loans. We originate mortgage loans to enable borrowers to purchase or refinance existing homes or to construct new one- to four-family homes. We offer fixed-rate mortgage loans with terms up to 30 years and adjustable-rate mortgage loans with terms up to 30 years. Borrower demand for adjustable-rate loans versus fixed-rate loans is a function of the level of interest rates, the expectations of changes in the level of interest rates, the difference between the interest rates and loan fees offered for fixed-rate mortgage loans and the first year interest rates and loan fees for adjustable-rate loans. The relative amount of fixed-rate mortgage loans and adjustable-rate mortgage loans that can be originated at any time is largely determined by the demand for each in a competitive environment and the effect each has on our interest rate risk.
The loan fees charged, interest rates and other provisions of mortgage loans are determined by us on the basis of our own pricing criteria and competitive market conditions. Interest rates and payments on our adjustable-rate loans generally are adjusted annually based on any change in the National Average Contract Mortgage Rate for the Purchase of Previously Occupied Homes by Combined Lenders as published by the Federal Housing Finance Board. Changes in this index tend to lag behind changes in market interest rates. Our adjustable-rate mortgage loans may have initial fixed-rate periods ranging from one to seven years.
We originate all adjustable-rate loans at the fully indexed interest rate. The maximum amount by which the interest rate may be increased or decreased is generally 2% per year and the lifetime interest rate cap is generally 5% over the initial interest rate of the loan. Our adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans generally do not provide for a decrease in the rate paid below the initial contract rate. The inability of our residential real estate loans to adjust downward below the initial contract rate can contribute to increased income in periods of declining interest rates, and also assists us in our efforts to limit the risks to earnings and equity value resulting from changes in interest rates, subject to the risk that borrowers may refinance these loans during periods of declining interest rates.
While one- to four-family residential real estate loans are normally originated with up to 30-year terms, such loans typically remain outstanding for substantially shorter periods because borrowers often prepay their loans in full upon sale of the property pledged as security or upon refinancing the original loan. In addition, substantially all of the mortgage loans in our loan portfolio contain due-on-sale clauses providing that Jefferson Federal may declare the unpaid amount due and payable upon the sale of the property securing the loan. Jefferson Federal enforces these due-on-sale clauses to the extent permitted by law. Therefore, average loan maturity is a function of, among other factors, the level of purchase and sale activity in the real estate market, prevailing interest rates and the interest rates payable on outstanding loans.
Historically, we have not emphasized the origination of loans that conform to guidelines for sale in the secondary mortgage market. However, beginning in January 2005, we began originating loans for the secondary mortgage market. Loans are sold without recourse and on a servicing-released basis. We generally do not make conventional loans with loan-to-value ratios exceeding 85% and generally make loans with a loan-to-value ratio in excess of 85% only when secured by first liens on owner-occupied, one- to four-family residences. Loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 90% generally require private mortgage insurance or additional collateral. We require all properties securing mortgage loans in excess of $250,000 to be appraised by a board-approved appraiser. We require title insurance on all mortgage loans in excess of $25,000. Borrowers must obtain hazard or flood insurance (for loans on property located in a flood zone) prior to closing the loan.
Home Equity Lines of Credit. We offer home equity lines of credit on single family residential property in amounts up to 80% of the appraised value. Rates and terms vary by borrower qualifications, but are generally offered on a variable rate, open-end term basis with maturities of ten years or less.
Commercial Real Estate and Multi-Family Loans. An important segment of our loan portfolio is mortgage loans secured by commercial and multi-family real estate. Our commercial real estate loans are secured by professional office buildings, shopping centers, manufacturing facilities, hotels, vacant land, churches and, to a lesser extent, by other improved property such as restaurants and retail operations.
We originate both fixed- and adjustable-rate loans secured by commercial and multi-family real estate with terms up to 20 years. Fixed-rate loans have provisions that allow us to call the loan after five years. Adjustable-rate loans are generally based on prime and adjust monthly. Loan amounts generally do not exceed 85% of the lesser of the appraised value or the purchase price. When the borrower is a corporation, partnership or other entity, we generally require personal guarantees from significant equity holders. Currently, it is our philosophy to originate commercial real estate loans only to borrowers known to us and on properties in or near our market area.
3
At June 30, 2012, loans with principal balances of $500,000 or more secured by commercial real estate totaled $79.3 million, or 63.9% of commercial real estate loans, and loans with principal balances of $500,000 or more secured by multi-family properties totaled $9.9 million, or 86.0% of multi-family loans. At June 30, 2012, 15 commercial real estate loans totaling $4.7 million were nonaccrual loans.
Construction Loans. We originate loans to finance the construction of one- to four-family homes and, to a lesser extent, multi-family and commercial real estate properties. At June 30, 2012, $230,000 of our construction loans was for the construction of one- to four-family homes and $318,000 was for the construction of commercial or multi-family real estate. Construction loans are generally made on a “pre-sold” basis; however, contractors who have sufficient financial strength and a proven track record are considered for loans for model and speculative purposes, with preference given to contractors with whom we have had successful relationships. We generally limit loans to contractors for speculative construction to a total of $350,000 per contractor. Construction loans generally provide for interest-only payments at fixed-rates of interest and have terms of six to 12 months. At the end of the construction period, the loan generally converts into a permanent loan. Construction loans to a borrower who will occupy the home, or to a builder who has pre-sold the home, will be considered for loan-to-value ratios of up to 85%. Construction loans for speculative purposes, models and commercial properties may be considered for loan-to-value ratios of up to 80%. Loan proceeds are disbursed in increments as construction progresses and as inspections warrant. We generally use in-house inspectors for construction disbursement purposes; however, we may rely on architect certifications and independent third party inspections for disbursements on larger commercial loans.
Land Loans. We originate loans secured by unimproved property, including lots for single family homes, raw land, commercial property and agricultural property. We originate both fixed- and adjustable-rate land loans with terms up to 20 years. Adjustable-rate loans are generally based on prime and adjust monthly. Loans secured by unimproved commercial property or for land development generally have five-year terms with a longer amortization schedule.
At June 30, 2012, our largest land loan had an outstanding balance of $3.9 million and was secured by vacant land. At June 30, 2012, loans with principal balances of $500,000 or more secured by unimproved property totaled $12.3 million, or 44.9% of land loans. At June 30, 2012, 15 land loans totaling $2.0 million were nonaccrual loans.
Commercial Business Loans. We extend commercial business loans on an unsecured and secured basis. Secured loans generally are collateralized by industrial/commercial machinery and equipment, livestock, farm machinery and, to a lesser extent, accounts receivable and inventory. We originate both fixed- and adjustable-rate commercial loans with terms up to 15 years. Fixed-rate loans have provisions that allow us to call the loan after five years. Adjustable-rate loans are generally based on prime and adjust monthly. Where the borrower is a corporation, partnership or other entity, we generally require personal guarantees from significant equity holders.
Consumer Loans. We offer a variety of consumer loans, including loans secured by automobiles and savings accounts. Other consumer loans include loans on recreational vehicles and boats, debt consolidation loans and personal unsecured debt.
The procedures for underwriting consumer loans include an assessment of the applicant’s payment history on other debts and ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loans. Although the applicant’s creditworthiness is a primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral, if any, to the proposed loan amount. We use a credit scoring system and charge borrowers with poorer credit scores higher interest rates to compensate for the additional risks associated with those loans.
Loan Underwriting Risks.
Adjustable-Rate Loans. While we anticipate that adjustable-rate loans will better offset the adverse effects of an increase in interest rates as compared to fixed-rate mortgages, the increased mortgage payments required of adjustable-rate loan borrowers in a rising interest rate environment could cause an increase in delinquencies and defaults. The marketability of the underlying property also may be adversely affected in a high interest rate environment. In addition, although adjustable-rate mortgage loans help make our asset base more responsive to changes in interest rates, the extent of this interest sensitivity is limited by the annual and lifetime interest rate adjustment limits.
4
Commercial and Multi-Family Real Estate Loans. Loans secured by commercial and multi-family real estate are generally larger and involve a greater degree of risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Of primary concern in commercial and multi-family real estate lending is the borrower’s creditworthiness and the feasibility and cash flow potential of the project. Payments on loans secured by income properties are often dependent on the successful operation or management of the properties. As a result, repayment of such loans may be subject to a greater extent than residential real estate loans to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. In order to monitor cash flows on income properties, we require borrowers and loan guarantors, if any, to provide annual financial statements and rent rolls on multi-family loans. We also perform annual reviews on all lending relationships of $500,000 or more where the loan is secured by commercial or multi-family real estate.
Construction Loans. Construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk of loss than long-term financing on improved, occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan is dependent largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction or development and the estimated cost (including interest) of construction. During the construction phase, a number of factors could result in delays and cost overruns. If the estimate of construction costs proves to be inaccurate, we may be required to advance funds beyond the amount originally committed to permit completion of the development. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, we may be confronted, at or prior to the maturity of the loan, with a project having a value which is insufficient to assure full repayment. As a result of the foregoing, construction lending often involves the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest. If we are forced to foreclose on a project prior to or at completion due to a default, there can be no assurance that we will be able to recover all of the unpaid balance of, and accrued interest on, the loan as well as related foreclosure and holding costs.
Land Loans. Loans secured by undeveloped land or improved lots generally involve greater risks than residential mortgage lending because land loans are more difficult to evaluate. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, in the event of default and foreclosure, we may be confronted with a property the value of which is insufficient to assure full repayment.
Commercial Loans. Commercial business lending generally involves greater risk than residential mortgage lending and involves risks that are different from those associated with commercial and multi-family real estate lending. Although the repayment of commercial and multi-family real estate loans depends primarily on the cash-flow of the property or related business, the underlying collateral generally provides a sufficient source of repayment. Although commercial business loans are often collateralized by equipment, inventory, accounts receivable or other business assets, the liquidation of collateral if a borrower defaults is often an insufficient source of repayment because accounts receivable may be uncollectible and inventories and equipment may be obsolete or of limited use, among other things. Accordingly, the repayment of a commercial business loan depends primarily on the cash-flow, character and creditworthiness of the borrower (and any guarantors), while liquidation of collateral is secondary.
Consumer Loans. Consumer loans may entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are unsecured or secured by assets that depreciate rapidly, such as automobiles, boats and recreational vehicles. In such cases, repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan and the remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.
5
Loan Originations. All of our portfolio loans are originated by in-house lending officers and are underwritten and processed in-house. We rely on advertising, referrals from realtors and customers, and personal contact by our staff to generate loan originations. We occasionally purchase participation interests in commercial real estate loans through other financial institutions in our market area.
Loan Approval Procedures and Authority. Loan approval authority has been granted by the Board of Directors to certain officers on an individual and combined basis for consumer (including residential mortgages) and commercial purpose loans up to a maximum of $1.0 million per transaction. All loans with aggregate exposure of $2.0 million or more require the approval of our Loan Committee or Board of Directors.
The Loan Committee meets every two weeks to review all mortgage loans made within granted lending authority of $75,000 or more and all non-mortgage loans made within granted lending authority of $50,000 or more. The committee approves all requests which exceed granted lending authority or when the request carries aggregate exposure to us of $2.0 million or more. The minutes of the committee are reported to and reviewed by the Board of Directors.
Loans to One Borrower. The maximum amount that we may lend to one borrower and the borrower’s related entities is limited by regulation. At June 30, 2012, our regulatory limit on loans to one borrower was $10.6 million. At that date, our largest lending relationship was $9.0 million and consisted of multiple real estate and commercial business loans. These loans were performing according to their original repayment terms at June 30, 2012.
Loan Commitments. We issue commitments for fixed-rate and adjustable-rate single-family residential mortgage loans conditioned upon the occurrence of certain events. Commitments to originate mortgage loans are legally binding agreements to lend to our customers and generally expire in 90 days or less.
Investment Activities
We have legal authority to invest in various types of liquid assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various federal agencies and of state and municipal governments, deposits at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati and certificates of deposit of federally insured institutions. Within certain regulatory limits, we also may invest a portion of our assets in corporate securities. We also are required to maintain an investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati stock.
At June 30, 2012, our investment portfolio consisted of U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, municipal securities and corporate securities.
Our investment objectives are to provide and maintain liquidity, to maintain a balance of high quality investments, to diversify investments to minimize risk, to provide collateral for pledging requirements, to establish an acceptable level of interest rate risk, to provide an alternate source of low-risk investments when demand for loans is weak, and to generate a favorable return. Any two of the following officers are authorized to purchase or sell investments: the President, Executive Vice President and/or Vice President. There is a limit of $2.0 million par value on any single investment purchase unless approval is obtained from the Board of Directors. For mortgage-backed securities, real estate mortgage investment conduits and collateralized mortgage obligations issued by Ginnie Mae, Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae, purchases are limited to a current par value of $2.5 million without Board approval.
Deposit Activities and Other Sources of Funds
General. Deposits and loan repayments are the major sources of our funds for lending and other investment purposes. Loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are significantly influenced by general interest rates and money market conditions. We may use borrowings on a short-term basis to compensate for reductions in the availability of funds from other sources. Borrowings may also be used on a longer-term basis for general business purposes.
6
Deposit Accounts. Substantially all of our depositors are residents of the State of Tennessee. Deposits are attracted from within our primary market area through the offering of a broad selection of deposit instruments, including NOW accounts, money market accounts, regular savings accounts, Christmas club savings accounts, certificates of deposit and retirement savings plans. We do not utilize brokered funds. Deposit account terms vary according to the minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining the terms of our deposit accounts, we consider the rates offered by our competition, profitability to us, matching deposit and loan products and customer preferences and concerns. We generally review our deposit mix and pricing monthly. Our current strategy is to offer competitive rates, but not be the market leader in every type and maturity. In recent years, our advertising has emphasized transaction accounts, with the goal of shifting our mix of deposits towards a smaller percentage of higher cost time deposits.
Borrowings. We have relied upon advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati to supplement our supply of lendable funds and to meet deposit withdrawal requirements. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank are typically secured by our first mortgage loans.
The Federal Home Loan Bank functions as a central reserve bank providing credit for member financial institutions. As a member, we are required to own capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank and are authorized to apply for advances on the security of such stock and certain of our mortgage loans and other assets (principally securities which are obligations of, or guaranteed by, the United States), provided certain standards related to creditworthiness have been met. Advances are made pursuant to several different programs. Each credit program has its own interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the program, limitations on the amount of advances are based either on a fixed percentage of an institution’s net worth or on the Federal Home Loan Bank’s assessment of the institution’s creditworthiness. Under its current credit policies, the Federal Home Loan Bank generally limits advances to 50% of a member’s assets. The availability of Federal Home Loan Bank advances to each borrower is based on the financial condition and the degree of security provided to collateralize borrowings.
Personnel
As of June 30, 2012, we had 123 full-time employees and 19 part-time employees, none of whom is represented by a collective bargaining unit. We believe our relationship with our employees is good.
Executive Officers
The executive officers of Jefferson Federal are elected annually by the Board of Directors and serve at the Board’s discretion. Ages presented are as of June 30, 2012. The executive officers of Jefferson Federal are:
|
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
||
|
Anderson L. Smith
|
64
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
|
Douglas H. Rouse
|
59
|
Senior Vice President
|
||
|
Jane P. Hutton
|
53
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
|
Eric S. McDaniel
|
|
41
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer
|
|
|
Janet J. Ketner
|
59
|
Executive Vice President of Retail Banking
|
||
|
Anthony J. Carasso
|
53
|
President—Knoxville Region
|
||
|
Harvey L. Mitchell
|
62
|
President—Tri-Cities Division
|
||
|
John W. Beard, Jr.
|
59
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer
|
||
|
Gary L. Keys
|
63
|
Executive Vice President and Manager, Special Assets
|
Biographical Information
Anderson L. Smith has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Jefferson Bancshares since March 2003 and President and Chief Executive Officer of Jefferson Federal since January 2002. Prior to joining Jefferson Federal, Mr. Smith was President, Consumer Financial Services - East Tennessee Metro, First Tennessee Bank National Association. Director since 2002.
7
Jane P. Hutton has been Treasurer and Secretary of Jefferson Bancshares since March 2003 and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Jefferson Federal since July 2009. From July 2002 to July 2009, Ms. Hutton served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Jefferson Federal. Ms. Hutton was named Chief Financial Officer of Jefferson Bancshares on July 1, 2003. From June 1999 until July 2002, Ms. Hutton served as Assistant Financial Analyst.
Douglas H. Rouse has been Senior Vice President of Jefferson Federal since January 2002. From March 1994 until January 2002, Mr. Rouse served as Vice President.
Eric S. McDaniel has been Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Jefferson Federal since July 2009. From July 2002 to July 2009, Mr. McDaniel served as Vice President and Senior Operations Officer of Jefferson Federal. From March 1996 until July 2002, Mr. McDaniel served as Director of Compliance and Internal Auditor.
Janet J. Ketner has been Executive Vice President of Retail Banking since January 2006. Prior to joining Jefferson Federal, Ms. Ketner was Executive Vice President of First Tennessee Bank for Morristown, Dandridge and Greeneville, Tennessee.
Anthony J. Carasso has been the President of Jefferson Federal’s Knoxville Region since January 2005. In 1999, Mr. Carasso was Chief Executive Officer and President of Union Planters in Murfreesboro, Tennessee. Since then, he has been President of two other Union Planters Banks, one in Somerset, Kentucky as well as Harriman, Tennessee. During his tenure in Harriman, he had a dual role as an Area Sales Manager managing 22 branches in 11 communities.
Harvey L. Mitchell has been the President of Jefferson Federal’s Tri-Cities Division since May 2012. Mr. Mitchell served as Senior Vice President and Commercial Lending Officer of Jefferson Federal from October 2008 to May 2012. Prior to that time, Mr. Mitchell served as Senior Vice President and Commercial Lending Officer of State of Franklin Savings Bank from August 2007 until State of Franklin Savings Bank was acquired by Jefferson Bancshares in October 2008.
John W. Beard, Jr. has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of Jefferson Federal since May 2012. Mr. Beard served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Bank, New Tazewell, Tennessee, from 2008 to May 2012. Prior to that time, Mr. Beard served as a Senior Credit Officer at First Tennessee Bank N.A. from 1992 to 2008.
Gary L. Keys has served as Executive Vice President and Manager, Special Assets of Jefferson Federal since May 2012. Mr. Keys served as Executive Vice President—Lending and Operations at Citizens Bank, New Tazewell, Tennessee, from 2008 to May 2012. Prior to that time, Mr. Keys served as Vice President and Kingsport City Executive and in various other positions at First Tennessee Bank N.A. from 1973 to 2008.
Subsidiaries
In addition to Jefferson Federal Bank, we currently have one subsidiary, State of Franklin Statutory Trust II. State of Franklin Statutory Trust II is a Delaware statutory trust. In December 2006, State of Franklin Bancshares issued subordinated debentures to State of Franklin Statutory Trust II, which purchased the debentures with the proceeds from the sale of trust preferred securities issued in a private placement. Our net consolidated principal obligation under the debentures and trust preferred securities is $10.0 million.
Regulation and Supervision of the Company
General. The Company is a bank holding company subject to regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”) under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”). As a result, the activities of the Company are subject to certain limitations, which are described below. In addition, as a bank holding company, the Company is required to file annual and quarterly reports with the Federal Reserve Board and to furnish such additional information as the Federal Reserve Board may require pursuant to the BHCA. The Company is also subject to regular examination by and the enforcement authority of the Federal Reserve Board.
8
Activities. With certain exceptions, the BHCA prohibits a bank holding company from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of a company that engages directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, or providing services for its subsidiaries. The principal exceptions to these prohibitions involve certain non-bank activities which, by statute or by Federal Reserve Board regulation or order, have been identified as activities closely related to the business of banking. The activities of the Company are subject to these legal and regulatory limitations under the BHCA and the related Federal Reserve Board regulations. Notwithstanding the Federal Reserve Board’s prior approval of specific nonbanking activities, the Federal Reserve Board has the power to order a holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any activity, or to terminate its ownership or control of any subsidiary, when it has reasonable cause to believe that the continuation of such activity or such ownership or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of any bank subsidiary of that holding company.
Acquisitions. Under the BHCA, a bank holding company must obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board before: (1) acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank or bank holding company if, after such acquisition, the bank holding company would directly or indirectly own or control more than 5% of such shares; (2) acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company; or (3) merging or consolidating with another bank holding company. Satisfactory financial condition, particularly with regard to capital adequacy, and satisfactory CRA ratings are generally prerequisites to obtaining federal regulatory approval to make acquisitions.
Under the BHCA, any company must obtain approval of the Federal Reserve Board prior to acquiring control of the Company or the Bank. For purposes of the BHCA, “control” is defined as ownership of more than 25% of any class of voting securities of the Company or the Bank, the ability to control the election of a majority of the directors, or the exercise of a controlling influence over management or policies of the Company or the Bank. In addition, the Change in Bank Control Act and the related regulations of the Federal Reserve Board require any person or persons acting in concert (except for companies required to make application under the BHCA), to file a written notice with the Federal Reserve Board before such person or persons may acquire control of the Company or the Bank. The Change in Bank Control Act defines “control” as the power, directly or indirectly, to vote 25% or more of any voting securities or to direct the management or policies of a bank holding company or an insured bank. There is a presumption of “control” where the acquiring person will own, control or hold with power to vote 10% or more of any class of voting security of a bank holding company or insured bank if, like the Company, the company involved has registered securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Under Tennessee banking law, prior approval of the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions is also required before any person may acquire control of a Tennessee bank or bank holding company. Tennessee law generally prohibits a bank holding company from acquiring control of an additional bank if, after such acquisition, the bank holding company would control more than 30% of the FDIC-insured deposits in the State of Tennessee.
Capital Requirements. The Federal Reserve Board has adopted guidelines regarding the consolidated capital adequacy of bank holding companies, which require bank holding companies to maintain specified minimum ratios of capital to total assets and to risk-weighted assets. See “Regulation and Supervision of the Bank—Capital Requirements.” The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which became law on July 21, 2010, requires the Federal Reserve Board to amend its capital requirements for bank holding companies so that they are at least as stringent as those for subsidiary financial institutions themselves. Such amendments will reduce the types of capital instruments that are includable as Tier 1 capital at the holding company level compared to what is currently allowable by the Federal Reserve Board.
On June 7, 2012, the Federal Reserve Board issued a final rule substantially amending the regulatory risk-based capital rules applicable to the Company and the Bank. The FDIC and the OCC subsequently approved a similar final rule on June 13, 2012. The final rules set forth certain changes for the calculation of risk-weighted assets, which we would be required to utilize beginning January 1, 2013. The standardized approach proposed rule utilizes an increased number of credit risk exposure categories and risk weights, and also addresses: (i) a proposed alternative standard of creditworthiness consistent with Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act; (ii) revisions to recognition of credit risk mitigation; (iii) rules for risk weighting of equity exposures and past due loans; (iv) revised capital treatment for derivatives and repo-style transactions; and (v) disclosure requirements for top-tier banking organizations with $50 billion or more in total assets that are not subject to the “advance approach rules” that apply to banks with greater than $250 billion in consolidated assets.
9
On August 30, 2012, the federal banking agencies issued proposed rules that would implement the “Basel III” regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. “Basel III” refers to two consultative documents released by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2009, the rules text released in December 2010, and loss absorbency rules issued in January 2011, which include significant changes to bank capital, leverage and liquidity requirements. The proposed rules are subject to a comment period running through October 22, 2012.
The proposed rules include new risk-based capital and leverage ratios, which would be phased in from 2013 to 2019, and would revise the definition of what constitutes “capital” for purposes of calculating those ratios. The proposed new minimum capital level requirements applicable to the Company and the Bank under the proposals would be: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6% (increased from 4%); (iii) a total capital ratio of 8% (unchanged from current rules); and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% for all institutions. The proposed rules would also establish a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5% above the new regulatory minimum capital requirements, which must consist entirely of common equity Tier 1 capital and would result in the following minimum ratios: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%, (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%, and (iii) a total capital ratio of 10.5%. The new capital conservation buffer requirement would be phased in beginning in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and would increase by that amount each year until fully implemented in January 2019. An institution would be subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the buffer amount. These limitations would establish a maximum percentage of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions.
Dividends. The Federal Reserve Board has the power to prohibit dividends by bank holding companies if their actions constitute unsafe or unsound practices. The Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, which expresses the Federal Reserve Board’s view that a bank holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that the company’s net income for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a rate of earnings retention that is consistent with the company’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The Federal Reserve Board also indicated that it would be inappropriate for a bank holding company experiencing serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay dividends. The Federal Reserve Board may prohibit a bank holding company from paying any dividends if the holding company’s bank subsidiary is classified as “undercapitalized” or worse.” See “Regulation and Supervision of the Bank—Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action.”
Stock Repurchases. Bank holding companies are required to give the Federal Reserve Board prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of its outstanding equity securities if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of the Company’s consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve Board may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would violate any law, regulation, Federal Reserve Board order, directive or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the Federal Reserve Board. This requirement does not apply to bank holding companies that are “well-capitalized,” received one of the two highest examination ratings at their last examination and are not the subject of any unresolved supervisory issues.
Regulation and Supervision of the Bank
General. The Bank is subject to extensive regulation by the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions (the “Department”) and, as an insured state bank that is not a member of the Federal Reserve System (a “nonmember bank”), by the FDIC. The lending activities and other investments of the Bank must comply with various federal regulatory requirements. The Department and FDIC periodically examine the Bank for compliance with these regulatory requirements and the Bank must regularly file reports with the Department and the FDIC describing its activities and financial condition. The Bank is also subject to certain reserve requirements promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board. This supervision and regulation is intended primarily for the protection of depositors.
10
The Dodd-Frank Act has created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “Bureau”) to implement federal consumer protection laws. The Bureau will assume responsibility for the existing federal consumer protection laws and regulations and has the authority to impose new requirements. The prudential regulators, however, will retain examination and enforcement authority over an institution’s compliance with such laws and regulations so long as the institution has less than $10 billion in assets.
Tennessee State Law. As a Tennessee-chartered savings bank, the Bank is subject to the applicable provisions of Tennessee law and the regulations of the Department adopted thereunder. The Bank derives its lending and investment powers from these laws, and is subject to periodic examination and reporting requirements by and of the Department. Certain powers granted under Tennessee law may be constrained by federal regulation. Banks nationwide are permitted to enter the Bank’s market area and compete for deposits and loan originations. The approval of the Department is required prior to any merger or consolidation, or the establishment or relocation of any branch office. Tennessee savings banks are also subject to the enforcement authority of the Department, which may suspend or remove directors or officers, issue cease and desist orders and appoint conservators or receivers in appropriate circumstances.
Capital Requirements. Under FDIC regulations, nonmember banks are required to maintain a minimum leverage capital requirement consisting of a ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of 3% if the FDIC determines that the institution is not anticipating or experiencing significant growth and has well-diversified risk, including no undue interest rate risk exposure, excellent asset quality, high liquidity, good earnings and in general a strong banking organization, rated composite 1 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (the CAMELS rating system) established by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. For all but the most highly rated institutions meeting the conditions set forth above, the minimum leverage capital ratio is not less than 4%. Tier 1 capital is the sum of common stockholders’ equity, noncumulative perpetual preferred stock (including any related surplus) and minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries, minus all intangible assets (other than certain mortgage servicing rights and purchased credit card relationships) minus identified losses, disallowed deferred tax assets and investments in financial subsidiaries and certain non-financial equity investments.
In addition to the leverage ratio (the ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets), state-chartered nonmember banks must maintain a minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8%, of which at least half must be Tier 1 capital. Qualifying total capital consists of Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 or supplementary capital items. Tier 2 capital items include allowances for loan losses in an amount of up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, certain cumulative preferred stock and subordinated debentures, certain other capital instruments and up to 45% of pre-tax net unrealized holding gains on equity securities. The includable amount of Tier 2 capital cannot exceed the institution’s Tier 1 capital. Qualifying total capital is further reduced by the amount of the bank’s investments in banking and finance subsidiaries that are not consolidated for regulatory capital purposes, reciprocal cross-holdings of capital securities issued by other banks, most intangible assets and certain other deductions. Under the FDIC risk-weighted system, all of a bank’s balance sheet assets and the credit equivalent amounts of certain off-balance sheet items are assigned to one of four broad risk weight categories from 0% to 100%, based on the risks inherent in the type of assets or item. The aggregate dollar amount of each category is multiplied by risk weight assigned to that category. The sum of these weighted values equals the Bank’s risk-weighted assets.
Dividend Limitations. The Bank may not pay dividends on its capital stock if its regulatory capital would thereby be reduced below the amount then required for the liquidation account established for the benefit of certain depositors of the Bank at the time of its conversion to stock form.
Earnings of the Bank appropriated to bad debt reserves and deducted for federal income tax purposes are not available for payment of cash dividends or other distributions to stockholders without payment of taxes at the then current tax rate by the Bank on the amount of earnings removed from the reserves for such distributions. The Bank intends to make full use of this favorable tax treatment and does not contemplate use of any earnings in a manner which would limit the Bank’s bad debt deduction or create federal tax liabilities.
11
Under FDIC regulations, the Bank is prohibited from making any capital distributions if, after making the distribution, the Bank would have: (i) a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8%; (ii) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4%; or (iii) a leverage ratio of less than 4%.
Investment Activities. Under federal law, all state-chartered FDIC-insured banks have generally been limited to activities as principal and equity investments of the type and in the amount authorized for national banks, notwithstanding state law, subject to certain exceptions. For example, the FDIC is authorized to permit institutions to engage in state authorized activities or investments that do not meet this standard (other than non-subsidiary equity investments) for institutions that meet all applicable capital requirements if it is determined that such activities or investments do not pose a significant risk to the Deposit Insurance Fund.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts. The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC. The Deposit Insurance Fund is the successor to the Bank Insurance Fund and the Savings Association Insurance Fund, which were merged in 2006. Under the FDIC’s previous risk-based assessment system, insured institutions were assigned to one of four risk categories based on supervisory evaluations, regulatory capital levels and certain other factors with less risky institutions paying lower assessments. An institution’s assessment rate was then determined upon the category to which it is assigned, and certain potential adjustments established by FDIC regulations. On February 7, 2011, however, the FDIC approved a final rule that implemented changes to the deposit insurance assessment system mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rule, which took effect for the quarter beginning April 1, 2011, requires that the base on which deposit insurance assessments are charged be revised from one that is based on domestic deposits to one that is based on average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity. Under the final rule, insured depository institutions are required to report their average consolidated total assets on a daily basis, using the regulatory accounting methodology established for reporting total assets. For purposes of the final rule, tangible equity is defined as Tier 1 capital.
Due to stress on the Deposit Insurance Fund caused by bank failures, the FDIC imposed on all insured institutions a special emergency assessment of five basis points of total assets minus Tier 1 capital, as of June 30, 2009 (capped at ten basis points of an institution’s deposit assessment base), in order to cover losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund. That special assessment was collected on September 30, 2009. The FDIC provided for similar assessments during the final two quarters of 2009, if deemed necessary. However, in lieu of further special assessments, the FDIC required insured institutions to prepay estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 through the fourth quarter of 2012. The estimated assessments, which include an assumed annual assessment base increase of 5%, were recorded as a prepaid expense asset as of December 30, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, and each quarter thereafter, a charge to earnings will be recorded for each regular assessment with an offsetting credit to the prepaid asset.
Because of the recent difficult economic conditions, deposit insurance per account owner had been raised to $250,000 for all types of accounts until January 1, 2014. That level was made permanent by the newly enacted Dodd-Frank Act. In addition, the FDIC adopted an optional Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLGP”) under which, for a fee, noninterest-bearing transaction accounts would receive unlimited insurance coverage until June 30, 2010, subsequently extended to December 31, 2010. The TLGP also included a debt component under which certain senior unsecured debt issued by institutions and their holding companies between October 13, 2008 and October 31, 2009 would be guaranteed by the FDIC through June 30, 2012, or in some cases, December 31, 2012. The Bank opted to participate in the unlimited noninterest-bearing transaction account coverage and the Bank and Company opted not to participate in the unsecured debt guarantee program. The Dodd-Frank Act extends the unlimited coverage of certain noninterest-bearing transaction accounts until December 31, 2012.
In addition to the assessment for deposit insurance, institutions are required to make payments on bonds issued in the late 1980s by the Financing Corporation to recapitalize a predecessor deposit insurance fund. This payment is established quarterly and during the four quarters ended June 30, 2012 averaged 0.67 basis points of assessable deposits.
12
The FDIC has authority to increase insurance assessments. A significant increase in insurance premiums would likely have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of the Bank. Management cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the future.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. The management of the Bank does not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of deposit insurance.
Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. Federal banking regulators are required to take prompt corrective action if an insured depository institution fails to satisfy certain minimum capital requirements, including a leverage limit, a risk-based capital requirement and any other measure deemed appropriate by the federal banking regulators for measuring the capital adequacy of an insured depository institution. All institutions, regardless of their capital levels, are restricted from making any capital distribution or paying any management fees if the institution would thereafter fail to satisfy the minimum levels for any of its capital requirements. An institution that fails to meet the minimum level for any relevant capital measure (an “undercapitalized institution”) may be: (i) subject to increased monitoring by the appropriate federal banking regulator; (ii) required to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan within 45 days; (iii) subject to asset growth limits; and (iv) required to obtain prior regulatory approval for acquisitions, branching and new lines of businesses. The capital restoration plan must include a guarantee by the institution’s holding company that the institution will comply with the plan until it has been adequately capitalized on average for four consecutive quarters, under which the holding company would be liable up to the lesser of 5% of the institution’s total assets or the amount necessary to bring the institution into capital compliance as of the date it failed to comply with its capital restoration plan. A “significantly undercapitalized” institution, as well as any undercapitalized institution that did not submit an acceptable capital restoration plan, may be subject to regulatory demands for recapitalization, broader application of restrictions on transactions with affiliates, limitations on interest rates paid on deposits, asset growth and other activities, possible replacement of directors and officers, and restrictions on capital distributions by any bank holding company controlling the institution. Any company controlling the institution could also be required to divest the institution or the institution could be required to divest subsidiaries. The senior executive officers of a significantly undercapitalized institution may not receive bonuses or increases in compensation without prior approval and the institution is prohibited from making payments of principal or interest on its subordinated debt. In their discretion, the federal banking regulators may also impose the foregoing sanctions on an undercapitalized institution if the regulators determine that such actions are necessary to carry out the purposes of the prompt corrective action provisions.
Under regulations jointly adopted by the federal banking regulators, an institution’s capital adequacy is evaluated on the basis of the institution’s total risk-based capital ratio (the ratio of its total capital to risk-weighted assets), Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio (the ratio of its core capital to risk-weighted assets) and leverage ratio (the ratio of its Tier 1 or core capital to adjusted total average assets). The following table shows the capital ratio requirements for each prompt corrective action category:
|
Adequately
|
Significantly
|
||||||
|
Well Capitalized
|
Capitalized
|
Undercapitalized
|
Undercapitalized
|
||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Total risk-based capital ratio
|
10.0% or more
|
8.0% or more
|
Less than 8.0%
|
Less than 6.0%
|
|||
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
|
6.0% or more
|
4.0% or more
|
Less than 4.0%
|
Less than 3.0%
|
|||
|
Leverage ratio
|
5.0% or more
|
4.0% or more *
|
Less than 4.0% *
|
Less than 3.0%
|
___________
* 3.0% if institution has a composite 1 CAMELS rating.
13
If an institution’s capital falls below the “critically undercapitalized” level, the institution is subject to conservatorship or receivership within specified timeframes. A “critically undercapitalized” institution is defined as an institution that has a ratio of “tangible equity” to total assets of less than 2.0%. Tangible equity is defined as core capital plus cumulative perpetual preferred stock (and related surplus) less all intangibles other than qualifying supervisory goodwill and certain purchased mortgage servicing rights. The FDIC may reclassify a well capitalized depository institution as adequately capitalized and may require an adequately capitalized or undercapitalized institution to comply with the supervisory actions applicable to associations in the next lower capital category (but may not reclassify a significantly undercapitalized institution as critically undercapitalized) if the FDIC determines, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing, that the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition or that the institution has received and not corrected a less-than-satisfactory rating for any CAMELS rating category.
Safety and Soundness Guidelines. Each federal banking agency has established safety and soundness standards for institutions under its authority. These agencies, including the FDIC, have released interagency guidelines establishing such standards and adopted rules with respect to safety and soundness compliance plans. The guidelines require savings institutions to maintain internal controls and information systems and internal audit systems that are appropriate for the size, nature and scope of the institution’s business. The guidelines also establish certain basic standards for loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate risk exposure, and asset growth. The guidelines further provide that savings institutions should maintain safeguards to prevent the payment of compensation, fees and benefits that are excessive or that could lead to material financial loss, and should take into account factors such as comparable compensation practices at comparable institutions. If the agency determines that a savings institution is not in compliance with the safety and soundness guidelines, it may require the institution to submit an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the guidelines. A savings institution must submit an acceptable compliance plan to the agency within 30 days of receipt of a request for such a plan. Failure to submit or implement a compliance plan may subject the institution to regulatory sanctions. Management believes that the Bank has met substantially all the standards adopted in the interagency guidelines.
Additionally, federal banking agencies have established standards relating to asset and earnings quality. The guidelines require a bank to maintain systems, commensurate with its size and the nature and scope of its operations, to identify problem assets and prevent deterioration in those assets as well as to evaluate and monitor earnings and ensure that earnings are sufficient to maintain adequate capital and reserves.
Federal Reserve System. The Federal Reserve Board regulations require depository institutions to maintain noninterest-earning reserves against their transaction accounts (primarily NOW and regular checking accounts). The Federal Reserve Board regulations generally provide that reserves be maintained against aggregate transaction accounts as follows: a 3% reserve ratio is assessed on net transaction accounts up to and including $55.2 million; a 10% reserve ratio is applied above $55.2 million. The first $10.7 million of otherwise reservable balances (subject to adjustments by the Federal Reserve Board) are exempted from the reserve requirements. The amounts are adjusted annually. The Bank is in compliance with these requirements. At June 30, 2012, the Bank met applicable FRB reserve requirements.
Federal Home Loan Bank System. The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System (“FHLBS”) which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks governed and regulated by the Federal Housing Finance Board (“FHFB”) of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board. The Bank, as a member of the FHLB of Cincinnati, is required to purchase and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB of Cincinnati. As of June 30, 2012, the Bank held stock in the FHLB of Cincinnati in the amount $4.7 million and was in compliance with the above requirement. The Federal Home Loan Banks are required to provide funds for certain purposes including contributing funds for affordable housing programs. These requirements, or financial stress caused by economic conditions, could reduce the amount of dividends that the Federal Home Loan Banks pay to their members and result in the Federal Home Loan Banks imposing a higher rate of interest on advances to their members.
Loans to Executive Officers, Directors and Principal Stockholders. Under federal law, loans to directors, executive officers and principal stockholders of a state non-member bank like the Bank must be made on substantially the same terms as those prevailing for comparable transactions with persons who are not executive officers, directors, principal stockholders or employees of the Bank unless the loan is made pursuant to a compensation or benefit plan that is widely available to employees and does not favor insiders. Loans to any executive officer, director and principal stockholder, together with all other outstanding loans to such person and affiliated interests, generally may not exceed 15% of the bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus, and aggregate loans to such persons may not exceed the institution’s unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. Loans to directors, executive officers and principal stockholders, and their respective affiliates, in excess of the greater of $25,000 or
14
5% of capital and surplus (and any loan or loans aggregating $500,000 or more) must be approved in advance by a majority of the board of directors of the bank with any “interested” director not participating in the voting. State nonmember banks are prohibited from paying the overdrafts of any of their executive officers or directors unless payment is made pursuant to a written, pre-authorized interest-bearing extension of credit plan that specifies a method of repayment or transfer of funds from another account at the bank. Loans to executive officers are further restricted as to type, amount and terms of credit. In addition, the BHCA prohibits extensions of credit to executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders of a depository institution by any other institution which has a correspondent banking relationship with the institution, unless such extension of credit is on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and does not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features.
Transactions with Affiliates. A state non-member bank or its subsidiaries may not engage in “covered transactions” with any one affiliate in an amount greater than 10% of such bank’s capital stock and surplus, and for all such transactions with all affiliates a state non-member bank is limited to an amount equal to 20% of capital stock and surplus. All such transactions must also be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable, to the bank or subsidiary as those provided to a non-affiliate. The term “covered transaction” includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of a guarantee and similar types of transactions. Specified collateral requirements apply to covered transactions such as loans to and guarantees issued on behalf of an affiliate. An affiliate of a state non-member bank is any company or entity which controls or is under common control with the state non-member bank and, for purposes of the aggregate limit on transactions with affiliates, any subsidiary that would be deemed a financial subsidiary of a national bank. In a holding company context, the parent holding company of a state non-member bank and any companies which are controlled by such parent holding company are affiliates of the state non-member bank. Federal law further prohibits a depository institution from extending credit to or offering any other services, or fixing or varying the consideration for such extension of credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain some additional service from the institution or certain of its affiliates or not obtain services of a competitor of the institution, subject to certain limited exceptions.
Enforcement. The FDIC has extensive enforcement authority over insured non-member banks, including the Bank. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, issue cease and desist orders and remove directors and officers. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated in response to violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices.
The FDIC has authority under federal law to appoint a conservator or receiver for an insured bank under limited circumstances. The FDIC is required, with certain exceptions, to appoint a receiver or conservator for an insured state non-member bank if that bank was “critically undercapitalized” on average during the calendar quarter beginning 270 days after the date on which the institution became “critically undercapitalized.” See “Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action.” The FDIC may also appoint itself as conservator or receiver for an insured state non-member institution under specific circumstances on the basis of the institution’s financial condition or upon the occurrence of other events, including: (1) insolvency; (2) substantial dissipation of assets or earnings through violations of law or unsafe or unsound practices; (3) existence of an unsafe or unsound condition to transact business; and (4) insufficient capital, or the incurring of losses that will deplete substantially all of the institution’s capital with no reasonable prospect of replenishment without federal assistance.
Community Reinvestment Act. Under the Community Reinvestment Act, as implemented by FDIC regulations, a state non-member bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate-income neighborhoods. The Community Reinvestment Act neither establishes specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor limits an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community. The Community Reinvestment Act requires the FDIC, in connection with its examination of an institution, to assess the institution’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to consider such record when it evaluates applications made by such institution. The Community Reinvestment Act requires public disclosure of an institution’s Community Reinvestment Act rating. The Bank’s latest Community Reinvestment Act rating received from the FDIC was “satisfactory.”
15
Financial Regulatory Legislation
The previously referenced Dodd-Frank Act contains a wide variety of provisions affecting the regulation of depository institutions. Those include, but are not limited to, restrictions related to mortgage originations, risk retention requirements as to securitized loans and the noted newly created consumer protection agency. The full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on our business and operations will not be known for years until regulations implementing the statute are written and adopted. The Dodd-Frank Act may have a material impact on our operations, particularly through increased compliance costs resulting from possible future consumer and fair lending regulations.
| ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
A return of recessionary conditions could result in increases in our level of non-performing loans and/or reduce demand for our products and services, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Following a national home price peak in mid-2006, falling home prices and sharply reduced sales volumes, along with the collapse of the United States’ subprime mortgage industry in early 2007, significantly contributed to a recession that officially lasted until June 2009, although the effects continued thereafter. Dramatic declines in real estate values and high levels of foreclosures resulted in significant asset write-downs by financial institutions, which have caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital, to merge with other institutions and, in some cases, to fail. Concerns over the United States’ credit rating (which was recently downgraded by Standard & Poor’s), the European sovereign debt crisis, and continued high unemployment in the United States, among other economic indicators, have contributed to increased volatility in the capital markets and diminished expectations for the economy.
A return of recessionary conditions and/or continued negative developments in the domestic and international credit markets may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the value of our loans and investments, and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability. Further declines in real estate values and sales volumes and continued high unemployment levels may result in higher than expected loan delinquencies and a decline in demand for our products and services. These negative events may cause us to incur losses and may adversely affect our capital, liquidity, and financial condition.
Our nonperforming assets expose us to increased risk of loss.
Our nonperforming assets have increased from historical levels primarily as a result of the recent economic recession. At June 30, 2012, we had total nonperforming assets of $25.2 million, or 4.82% of total assets compared to $18.2 million, or 3.25% of total assets at June 30, 2011.
Our nonperforming assets adversely affect our net income in various ways. We do not accrue interest income on non-accrual loans and no interest income is recognized until the loan is performing. Loans are returned to accrual status when future payments are reasonably assured. We must reserve for probable losses, which are established through a current period charge to income in the provision for loan losses, and from time to time, write down the value of properties in our other real estate owned portfolio to reflect changing market values. Additionally, there are legal fees associated with the resolution of problem assets as well as carrying costs such as taxes, insurance and maintenance related to our other real estate owned.
Changes in interest rates could reduce our net interest income and earnings.
Our net interest income is the interest we earn on loans and investments less the interest we pay on our deposits and borrowings. Our net interest spread is the difference between the yield we earn on our assets and the interest rate we pay for deposits and our other sources of funding. Changes in interest rates—up or down—could adversely affect our net interest margin and, as a result, our net interest income. Although the yield we earn on our assets and our funding costs tend to move in the same direction in response to changes in interest rates, one can rise or fall faster than the other, causing our net interest margin to expand or contract. Our liabilities tend to be shorter in
16
duration than our assets, so they may adjust faster in response to changes in interest rates. As a result, when interest rates rise, our funding costs may rise faster than the yield we earn on our assets, causing our net interest margin to contract until the yield catches up. This contraction could be more severe following a prolonged period of lower interest rates, as a larger proportion of our fixed rate residential loan portfolio will have been originated at those lower rates and borrowers may be more reluctant or unable to sell their homes in a higher interest rate environment. Changes in the slope of the “yield curve”—or the spread between short-term and long-term interest rates—could also reduce our net interest margin. Normally, the yield curve is upward sloping, meaning short-term rates are lower than long-term rates. Because our liabilities tend to be shorter in duration than our assets, when the yield curve flattens or even inverts, we could experience pressure on our net interest margin as our cost of funds increases relative to the yield we can earn on our assets.
Strong competition within our market area could hurt our profits and slow growth.
We face intense competition both in making loans and attracting deposits. This competition has made it more difficult for us to make new loans and at times has forced us to offer higher deposit rates. Price competition for loans and deposits might result in us earning less on our loans and paying more on our deposits, which reduces net interest income. At June 30, 2011, which is the most recent date for which data is available from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, we held: (i) 22.66% of the deposits in Hamblen County, which is the largest market share out of 10 financial institutions with offices in the county at that date; (ii) 0.32% of the deposits in the Knoxville, Tennessee, metropolitan statistical area, which is the 27th largest market share out of 44 financial institutions with offices in the metropolitan statistical area at that date; (iii) 4.96% of the deposits in the Johnson City, Tennessee metropolitan statistical area, which is the ninth largest market share out of 23 financial institutions located in the metropolitan statistical area at that date; and (iv) 1.27% of the deposits in the Kingsport, Tennessee-Bristol, Virginia metropolitan statistical area, which is the 18th largest market share out of 31 financial institutions located in the metropolitan statistical area at that date. Banks owned by SunTrust Banks, Inc., First Tennessee National Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation and other large regional bank holding companies also operate in our primary market areas. These institutions are significantly larger than us and, therefore, have significantly greater resources. We expect competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to compete successfully in our market area.
Our commercial real estate, commercial business and multi-family real estate loans expose us to increased lending risks.
At June 30, 2012, $180.9 million, or 55.0%, of our loan portfolio consisted of commercial real estate, commercial business and multi-family real estate loans. Commercial real estate and multi-family real estate loans generally expose a lender to greater risk of non-payment and loss than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans because repayment of the loans often depends on the successful operation of the property and the income stream of the borrowers. Commercial business loans expose us to additional risks because they typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayments from the cash flow of the borrower’s business and are secured by collateral that may depreciate over time. All three of these types of loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Because such loans generally entail greater risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, we may need to increase our allowance for loan losses in the future to account for the likely increase in probable incurred credit losses associated with the growth of such loans. Also, many of our commercial borrowers have more than one loan outstanding with us. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to a one- to four-family residential mortgage loan.
17
We may require further additions to our allowance for loan losses, which would reduce net income.
If our borrowers do not repay their loans or if the collateral securing their loans is insufficient to provide for the full repayment, we may suffer credit losses. Credit losses are inherent in the lending business and could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectibility of our loan portfolio and provide an allowance for loan losses based on a number of factors. If our assumptions and judgments are wrong, our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover our losses. In addition, when real estate values decline, the potential severity of loss on a real estate-secured loan can increase significantly, especially in the case of loans with high combined loan-to-value ratios. The recent decline in the national economy and the local economies of the areas in which the loans are concentrated could result in an increase in loan delinquencies, foreclosures or repossessions resulting in increased charge-off amounts and the need for additional loan loss allowances in future periods. If we determine that our allowance for loan losses is insufficient, we would be required to take additional provisions for loan losses, which would reduce net income during the period those provisions are taken. In addition, the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions and the FDIC periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require us to increase our allowance for loan losses or to charge off particular loans.
We may be required to write down the value of our investment securities if we conclude that a decline in the value in any of our securities is other than temporary.
We review our investment portfolio periodically to determine whether the fair value is below the current carrying value. If the fair value of any of our investment securities has declined below its carrying value, we are required to determine whether the decline is other than temporary. If we conclude that the decline is other than temporary, we are required to write down the value of that security through a charge to earnings.
The loss of our President and Chief Executive Officer could hurt our operations.
We rely heavily on our President and Chief Executive Officer, Anderson L. Smith. The loss of Mr. Smith could have an adverse effect on us because, as a small community bank, Mr. Smith is responsible for more aspects of our business than he might be at a larger financial institution with more employees. Moreover, as a small community bank, we have fewer management-level employees who are in a position to succeed and assume the responsibilities of Mr. Smith. We have entered into a three-year employment agreement with Mr. Smith. We do not have key-man life insurance on Mr. Smith.
We operate in a highly regulated environment and we may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations.
We are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions, our chartering authority, and by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as insurer of our deposits. As a bank holding company, Jefferson Bancshares is subject to regulation and supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Such regulation and supervision govern the activities in which an institution and its holding company may engage, and are intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and depositors. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on our operations, the classification of our assets and determination of the level of our allowance for loan losses. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, legislation or supervisory action, may have a material impact on our operations.
Recent regulatory reform may have a material impact on our operations.
On July 21, 2010, the President signed into law The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). The Dodd-Frank Act contains various provisions designed to enhance the regulation of depository institutions and prevent the recurrence of a financial crisis such as occurred in 2008 and 2009. These include provisions strengthening holding company capital requirements, requiring retention of a portion of the risk of securitized loans and regulating debit card interchange fees. The Dodd-Frank Act also creates a new federal agency to administer consumer protection and fair lending laws, a function that is now performed by the
18
depository institution regulators. The full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on our business and operations will not be known for years until regulations implementing the statute are written and adopted. However, it is likely that the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will have an adverse impact on our operations, particularly through increased regulatory burden and compliance costs. Additionally, on August 30, 2012, the federal banking regulatory agencies issued proposed rules that would implement the “Basel III” regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. If adopted as proposed, Basel III and regulations proposed by the federal banking regulatory agencies will require bank holding companies and banks to undertake significant activities to demonstrate compliance with the new and higher capital standards. Compliance with these rules, which are still being analyzed, will impose additional costs on banking entities and their holding companies.
Liquidity risk could impair our ability to fund operations and jeopardize our financial condition.
Liquidity is essential to our business. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans and other sources could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry in general, which could significantly affect our ability to fund normal operations. In addition, our ability to acquire deposits or borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as a severe disruption of the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry as a whole as the recent turmoil faced by banking organizations in the domestic and worldwide credit markets deteriorates. Furthermore, Jefferson Bancshares is a separate entity and apart from Jefferson Federal and must provide for its own liquidity. In addition to its operating expenses, Jefferson Bancshares is responsible for the payment of dividends declared for its shareholders, and interest and principal on outstanding debt. Substantially all of Jefferson Bancshares’ revenues are obtained from subsidiary service fees and dividends. Payment of such dividends to Jefferson Bancshares by Jefferson Federal is limited under Tennessee law. The amount that can be paid in any calendar year, without prior approval from the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions, cannot exceed the total of Jefferson Federal’s net income for the year combined with its retained net income for the preceding two years.
We are subject to certain risks in connection with our use of technology, including risks associated with systems failures, interruptions, or breaches of security.
Communications and information systems are essential to the conduct of our business, as we use such systems to manage our customer relationships, our general ledger, our deposits, and our loans. While we have established policies and procedures to prevent or limit the impact of systems failures, interruptions, and security breaches, there can be no assurance that such events will not occur or that they will be adequately addressed if they do. Although we rely on commonly used security and processing systems to provide the security and authentication necessary to effect the secure transmission of data, these precautions may not protect our systems from compromises or breaches of security. In addition, we outsource certain of our data processing to certain third-party providers. If our third-party providers encounter difficulties, or if we have difficulty in communicating with them, our ability to adequately process and account for customer transactions could be affected, and our business operations could be adversely impacted. Threats to information security also exist in the processing of customer information through various other vendors and their personnel. The occurrence of any systems failure, interruption, or breach of security could damage our reputation and result in a loss of customers and business, could subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or could expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The charter and bylaws of Jefferson Bancshares may prevent or make more difficult certain transactions, including a sale or merger of Jefferson Bancshares.
Provisions of the charter and bylaws of Jefferson Bancshares may make it more difficult for companies or persons to acquire control of Jefferson Bancshares. Consequently, our shareholders may not have the opportunity to participate in such a transaction and the trading price of our common stock may not rise to the level of other institutions that are more vulnerable to hostile takeovers. In addition, these provisions also make more difficult the removal of current directors or management, or the election of new directors. These provisions include:
19
|
·
|
supermajority voting requirements for certain business combinations and changes to some provisions of the charter and bylaws;
|
|
|
·
|
limitation on the right to vote shares;
|
|
|
·
|
the election of directors to staggered terms of three years;
|
|
|
·
|
provisions regarding the timing and content of shareholder proposals and nominations;
|
|
|
·
|
provisions restricting the calling of special meetings of shareholders;
|
|
|
·
|
the absence of cumulative voting by shareholders in the election of directors; and
|
|
|
·
|
the removal of directors only for cause.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
None.
|
ITEM 2.
|
We conduct our business through our main office, nine full-service branch offices and two limited-service drive-through facilities located in Hamblen, Knox, Sullivan and Washington Counties, Tennessee. We own all of our offices, except for a drive-through facility located in Morristown, Tennessee, the lease on which expires in April 2013. As of June 30, 2012, the total net book value of our offices was $26.4 million. We believe that our facilities are adequate to meet our present and immediately foreseeable needs.
|
ITEM 3.
|
Jefferson Bancshares is not a party to any pending legal proceedings. Periodically, there have been various claims and lawsuits involving Jefferson Federal, such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which Jefferson Federal holds security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues incident to Jefferson Federal’s business. Jefferson Federal is not a party to any pending legal proceedings that it believes would have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or operations of the Company.
|
ITEM 4.
|
Not applicable.
Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Jefferson Bancshares’ common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “JFBI.” As of June 30, 2012, Jefferson Bancshares had approximately 646 holders of record (excluding the number of persons or entities holding stock in street name through various brokerage firms), and 6,631,989 shares issued and outstanding.
20
The following table sets forth high and low sales prices for each quarter during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 for Jefferson Bancshares’ common stock, and corresponding quarterly dividends period per share.
|
High
|
Low
|
Dividend Paid
Per Share
|
||||||||||
|
Year Ended June 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||
|
Fourth quarter
|
$ | 2.47 | $ | 1.84 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||
|
Third quarter
|
2.75 | 2.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||
|
Second quarter
|
2.90 | 2.18 | 0.00 | |||||||||
|
First quarter
|
3.37 | 2.50 | 0.00 | |||||||||
|
Year Ended June 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||
|
Fourth quarter
|
$ | 3.96 | $ | 3.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||
|
Third quarter
|
5.02 | 3.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||
|
Second quarter
|
3.71 | 2.75 | 0.00 | |||||||||
|
First quarter
|
4.39 | 3.05 | 0.00 | |||||||||
The Board of Directors of Jefferson Bancshares has the authority to declare dividends on the common stock, subject to statutory and regulatory requirements. Declarations of dividends by the Board of Directors, if any, will depend upon a number of factors, including investment opportunities available to Jefferson Bancshares or Jefferson Federal, capital requirements, regulatory limitations, Jefferson Bancshares’ and Jefferson Federal’s financial condition and results of operations, tax considerations and general economic conditions. No assurances can be given, however, that any dividends will be paid or, if commenced, will continue to be paid.
Jefferson Bancshares is subject to the requirements of Tennessee law, which generally prohibits distributions to shareholders if, after giving effect to the distribution, the corporation would not be able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business or the corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed, if the corporation were to be dissolved at the time of the distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of shareholders whose preferential rights are superior to those receiving the distribution.
21
The following table provides certain information with regard to shares repurchased by the Company in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.
|
Period
|
(a)
Total number of Shares (or Units) Purchased
|
(b)
Average Price Paid per Share
(or Unit)
|
(c)
Total Number of Shares (or units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
|
(d)
Maximum Number (or Appropriate Dollar Value) of Shares (or units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
|
||||||||||||
|
April 1, 2012
through
April 30, 2012
|
— | $ | 0.00 | — | 437,802 | (1) | ||||||||||
|
May 1, 2012
through
May 31, 2012
|
50 | $ | 2.15 | 50 | 437,752 | (1) | ||||||||||
|
June 1, 2012
through
June 30, 2012
|
— | $ | 0.00 | — | 437,752 | (1) | ||||||||||
|
Total
|
50 | $ | 0.00 | 50 | 437,752 | |||||||||||
|
(1)
|
On November 13, 2008, the Company announced a stock repurchase program under which the Company may repurchase up to 620,770 shares of the Company’s common stock, from time to time, subject to market conditions. The repurchase program will continue until completed or terminated by the Board of Directors.
|
22
|
ITEM 6.
|
The selected financial information below is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company.
|
At or For the Year Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Financial Condition Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 522,930 | $ | 561,189 | $ | 630,770 | $ | 662,655 | $ | 330,265 | ||||||||||
|
Loans receivable, net
|
322,499 | 378,587 | 434,378 | 498,107 | 282,483 | |||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents,interest-bearing deposits
|
56,693 | 40,548 | 69,303 | 44,108 | 17,616 | |||||||||||||||
|
Investment securities
|
83,483 | 74,780 | 62,989 | 36,544 | 3,478 | |||||||||||||||
|
Borrowings
|
45,506 | 38,887 | 85,778 | 91,098 | 33,000 | |||||||||||||||
|
Deposits
|
423,882 | 454,262 | 479,183 | 482,167 | 223,552 | |||||||||||||||
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
52,629 | 55,919 | 56,523 | 79,505 | 72,777 | |||||||||||||||
|
Operating Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest income
|
$ | 22,432 | $ | 26,334 | $ | 30,043 | $ | 28,175 | $ | 20,846 | ||||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
4,570 | 8,030 | 11,593 | 11,619 | 9,248 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net interest income
|
17,862 | 18,304 | 18,450 | 16,556 | 11,598 | |||||||||||||||
|
Provision for loan losses
|
9,873 | 4,447 | 8,809 | 910 | 451 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
7,989 | 13,857 | 9,641 | 15,646 | 11,147 | |||||||||||||||
|
Noninterest income
|
2,180 | 3,233 | 4,034 | 3,185 | 1,520 | |||||||||||||||
|
Noninterest expense
|
16,693 | 17,411 | 39,657 | 14,683 | 9,889 | |||||||||||||||
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
(6,524 | ) | (321 | ) | (25,982 | ) | 4,148 | 2,778 | ||||||||||||
|
Total income taxes
|
(2,524 | ) | (351 | ) | (1,982 | ) | 1,518 | 1,531 | ||||||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | (4,000 | ) | $ | 30 | $ | (24,000 | ) | $ | 2,630 | $ | 1,247 | ||||||||
|
Per Share Data:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Earnings per share, basic
|
$ | (0.64 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (3.85 | ) | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.22 | ||||||||
|
Earnings per share, diluted
|
$ | (0.64 | ) | $ | 0.00 | $ | (3.85 | ) | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.22 | ||||||||
|
Dividends per share
|
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.24 | ||||||||||
23
|
At or For the Year Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Performance Ratios:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Return on average assets
|
(0.74 | %) | 0.00 | % | (3.65 | )% | 0.48 | % | 0.37 | % | ||||||||||
|
Return on average equity
|
(7.37 | ) | 0.05 | (29.65 | ) | 3.40 | 1.69 | |||||||||||||
|
Interest rate spread (1)
|
3.60 | 3.21 | 3.04 | 3.23 | 3.00 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net interest margin (2)
|
3.72 | 3.35 | 3.22 | 3.46 | 3.73 | |||||||||||||||
|
Noninterest expense to average assets (5)
|
3.10 | 2.86 | 2.72 | 2.67 | 2.94 | |||||||||||||||
|
Efficiency ratio (3) (5)
|
83.38 | 85.71 | 83.93 | 76.57 | 75.38 | |||||||||||||||
|
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
|
111.99 | 109.61 | 108.76 | 110.52 | 124.75 | |||||||||||||||
|
Dividend payout ratio (4)
|
0.00 | 0.00 | N/M | 55.81 | 109.09 | |||||||||||||||
|
Capital Ratios:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tangible capital
|
8.23 | 8.50 | 7.29 | 7.85 | 19.57 | |||||||||||||||
|
Core capital
|
12.17 | 11.74 | 10.35 | 9.57 | 19.57 | |||||||||||||||
|
Risk-based capital
|
13.42 | 13.00 | 11.61 | 10.49 | 24.16 | |||||||||||||||
|
Average equity to average assets
|
10.07 | 9.35 | 12.33 | 14.09 | 21.87 | |||||||||||||||
|
Asset Quality Ratios:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total gross loans
|
1.78 | 2.11 | 2.17 | 0.94 | 0.65 | |||||||||||||||
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of nonperforming loans
|
31.53 | 99.19 | 51.38 | 78.30 | 609.97 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net charge-offs to average outstanding loans during the period
|
3.36 | 1.42 | 0.83 | 0.14 | 0.20 | |||||||||||||||
|
Nonperforming loans as a percent of total loans
|
5.65 | 2.13 | 4.22 | 1.20 | 0.11 | |||||||||||||||
|
Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets
|
4.82 | 3.25 | 4.18 | 1.43 | 0.23 | |||||||||||||||
|
(1)
|
Represents the difference between the weighted average yield on average interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income, excluding gains or losses on the sale of securities.
|
|
(4)
|
Reflects dividends per share declared in the period divided by earnings per share for the period.
|
|
(5)
|
2010 ratios exclude a goodwill impairment charge of $21.8 million.
|
The objective of this section is to help shareholders and potential investors understand our views on our results of operations and financial condition. You should read this discussion in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements that appear elsewhere in this report.
24
Overview.
Income
We have two primary sources of pre-tax income. The first is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income – which is the income that we earn on our loans and investments – and interest expense – which is the interest that we pay on our deposits and borrowings.
Our second principal source of pre-tax income is fee income – the compensation we receive from providing products and services. Most of our fee income comes from service charges on NOW accounts and fees for late loan payments. We also earn fee income from ATM charges, insurance commissions, safe deposit box rentals and other fees and charges.
We occasionally recognize gains or losses as a result of sales of investment securities or foreclosed real estate. These gains and losses are not a regular part of our income.
Expenses
The expenses we incur in operating our business consist of compensation and benefits expenses, occupancy expenses, equipment and data processing expense, deposit insurance premiums, advertising expenses, expenses for foreclosed real estate and other miscellaneous expenses.
Compensation and benefits consist primarily of the salaries and wages paid to our employees, fees paid to our directors and expenses for retirement and other employee benefits.
Occupancy expenses, which are the fixed and variable costs of building and equipment, consist primarily of lease payments, real estate taxes, depreciation charges, maintenance and costs of utilities.
Equipment and data processing expense includes fees paid to our third-party data processing service and expenses and depreciation charges related to office and banking equipment.
Deposit insurance premiums are payments we make to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for insurance of our deposit accounts.
Expenses for foreclosed real estate include maintenance and repairs on foreclosed properties prior to sale.
Other expenses include expenses for attorneys, accountants and consultants, payroll taxes, franchise taxes, charitable contributions, insurance, office supplies, postage, telephone and other miscellaneous operating expenses.
Critical Accounting Policies
We consider accounting policies involving significant judgments and assumptions by management that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets or on income to be critical accounting policies. We consider the following to be our critical accounting policies: allowance for loan losses and deferred income taxes.
Allowance for Loan Losses. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves a high degree of judgment. Management reviews the level of the allowance on a monthly basis and establishes the provision for loan losses based on the composition of the loan portfolio, delinquency levels, loss experience, economic condition and other factors related to the collectibility of the loan portfolio. Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on estimates that are susceptible to change as a result of changes in economic conditions and other factors. In addition, Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions and the FDIC, as an integral part of their examination processes, periodically review our allowance for loan losses. These agencies may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.
25
Deferred Income Taxes. We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. If current available information raises doubt as to the realization of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance is established. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting tax liabilities and assets, including projections of future taxable income. These judgments and estimates are reviewed on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change.
Results of Operations for the Years Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011
Overview.
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands,
except per share data)
|
||||||||
|
Net earnings
|
$ | (4,000 | ) | $ | 30 | |||
|
Net earnings per share, basic
|
$ | (0.64 | ) | $ | 0.00 | |||
|
Net earnings per share, diluted
|
$ | (0.64 | ) | $ | 0.00 | |||
|
Return on average assets
|
(0.74 | %) | 0.00 | % | ||||
|
Return on average equity
|
(7.37 | %) | 0.05 | % | ||||
For the year ended June 30, 2012, the Company reported a net loss of $4.0 million, or $0.64 per diluted share, compared to net income of $30,000, or $0.00 per diluted share, for the year ended June 30, 2011. Financial results for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 were negatively impacted by a $9.9 million provision for loan losses compared to a provision of $4.4 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011. The increase in the provision for loan losses was attributable to higher realized and estimated losses.
Results for fiscal 2011 include impairment charges recorded on collateralized debt obligations that were acquired in connection with the acquisition of State of Franklin Bancshares in October 2008 that reduced net income approximately $515,000.
26
Net Interest Income.
The following table summarizes changes in interest income and expense for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
|
Year Ended
June 30,
|
% Change
|
|||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2012/2011 | ||||||||||
|
Interest income:
|
||||||||||||
|
Loans
|
$ | 20,271 | $ | 24,251 | (16.4 | %) | ||||||
|
Investment securities
|
1,900 | 1,696 | 12.0 | |||||||||
|
Interest-earning deposits
|
62 | 180 | (65.6 | ) | ||||||||
|
FHLB stock
|
199 | 207 | (3.9 | ) | ||||||||
|
Total interest income
|
22,432 | 26,334 | (14.8 | ) | ||||||||
|
Interest expense:
|
||||||||||||
|
Deposits
|
2,965 | 5,601 | (47.1 | ) | ||||||||
|
Borrowings
|
1,278 | 2,111 | (39.5 | ) | ||||||||
|
Subordinated debentures
|
327 | 318 | 2.8 | |||||||||
|
Total interest expense
|
4,570 | 8,030 | (43.1 | ) | ||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 17,862 | $ | 18,304 | (2.4 | %) | ||||||
Net interest income before loan loss provision decreased $442,000 to $17.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2012. The interest rate spread and net interest margin for the year ended June 30, 2012 were 3.60% and 3.72%, respectively, compared to 3.21% and 3.35%, respectively, for the year ended June 30, 2011.
Total interest income decreased $3.9 million, or 14.8%, to $22.4 million for fiscal 2012 compared to $26.3 million for fiscal 2011 primarily due to a lower volume of interest-earning assets and lower market interest rates. The average volume of earning assets decreased $67.4 million to $481.2 million for fiscal 2012, while the average yield on interest-earning assets decreased 16 basis points to 4.66% compared to fiscal 2011.
Interest on loans decreased $4.0 million, or 16.4%, to $20.3 million for fiscal 2012 as a result of a lower average balance of loans and a lower average yield. The average balance of loans decreased $52.8 million, or 12.7%, to $363.2 million due to the combination of reduced loan demand, normal paydowns on existing loans, transfers to OREO and charge-offs. The average yield on loans was 5.57% for fiscal 2012 compared to 5.83% for fiscal 2011.
Interest on investment securities increased to $1.9 million for fiscal 2012 compared to $1.7 million for fiscal 2011. The average balance of investment securities increased $28.3 million to $83.3 million for the fiscal 2012 compared to $55.0 million for fiscal 2011 as excess liquidity has been deployed into the investment portfolio. The average yield on investments decreased to 2.36% for fiscal 2012 compared to 3.23% for fiscal 2011 due to lower market interest rates. A portion of the proceeds from called securities has been reinvested in securities with lower yields. Dividends on Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock were $199,000 for fiscal 2012, compared to $207,000 for fiscal 2011.
Total interest expense decreased $3.4 million to $4.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2012, compared to $8.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2011. The average volume of interest-bearing liabilities decreased $70.8 million, to $429.6 million while the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased 54 basis points to 1.06% for fiscal 2012. Interest expense on deposits decreased $2.6 million to $3.0 million for 2012 compared to $5.6 million for fiscal 2011 as a result of lower interest rates combined with a lower average balance of deposits. The average rate paid on deposits decreased 53 basis points to 0.77% for the year ended June 30, 2012. Interest expense on FHLB advances was $1.3 million for fiscal 2012 compared to $2.1 million for fiscal 2011. The average balance of FHLB advances decreased $22.6 million to $37.9 million, as excess liquidity was used to repay FHLB advances during fiscal 2011. The average rate paid on FHLB advances decreased 13 basis points to 3.35% for fiscal 2012 compared to 3.48% for fiscal 2011.
27
Average Balances and Yields. The following table presents information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities, as well as the total dollar amounts of interest income and dividends from average interest-earning assets and interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities and the resulting average yields and costs. The yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. For purposes of this table nonaccrual loan balances and related accrued interest income have been included.
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Average
Balance
|
Interest
and
Dividends
|
Yield/
Cost
|
Average
Balance
|
Interest
and
Dividends
|
Yield/
Cost
|
Average
Balance
|
Interest
and
Dividends
|
Yield/
Cost
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loans(1)
|
$ | 363,154 | $ | 20,271 | 5.57 | % | $ | 415,966 | $ | 24,251 | 5.83 | % | $ | 468,232 | $ | 27,038 | 5.77 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Investment securities
|
83,276 | 1,900 | 2.36 | 55,013 | 1,696 | 3.23 | 52,771 | 2,730 | 5.32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily interest deposits
|
29,996 | 62 | 0.21 | 72,804 | 180 | 0.25 | 49,710 | 56 | 0.11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other earning assets
|
4,735 | 199 | 4.19 | 4,735 | 207 | 4.37 | 4,735 | 219 | 4.63 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
481,161 | 22,432 | 4.66 | 548,518 | 26,334 | 4.82 | 575,448 | 30,043 | 5.23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Noninterest-earning assets
|
57,864 | — | — | 59,553 | — | — | 81,293 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 539,025 | — | $ | 608,071 | — | $ | 656,741 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Passbook accounts
|
$ | 97,167 | 485 | 0.50 | 86,581 | 651 | 0.75 | $ | 84,063 | 943 | 1.12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NOW accounts
|
48,312 | 77 | 0.16 | 49,609 | 145 | 0.29 | 52,364 | 220 | 0.42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Money market accounts
|
53,797 | 311 | 0.58 | 56,113 | 521 | 0.93 | 52,292 | 705 | 1.35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Certificates of deposit
|
184,352 | 2,092 | 1.13 | 239,551 | 4,284 | 1.79 | 242,793 | 6,184 | 2.55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
383,628 | 2,965 | 0.77 | 431,854 | 5,601 | 1.30 | 431,512 | 8,052 | 1.87 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Borrowings
|
37,906 | 1,272 | 3.35 | 60,459 | 2,105 | 3.48 | 89,241 | 3,208 | 3.59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Repurchase agreements
|
912 | 6 | 0.66 | 1,053 | 6 | 0.57 | 1,378 | 9 | 0.65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Subordinated debentures
|
7,186 | 327 | 4.54 | 7,073 | 318 | 4.50 | 6,962 | 324 | 4.65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
$ | 429,632 | 4,570 | 1.06 | 500,439 | 8,030 | 1.60 | 529,093 | 11,593 | 2.19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
54,090 | — | — | 49,503 | — | — | 45,431 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
1,014 | — | — | 1,284 | — | — | 1,266 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
484,736 | 551,226 | 575,791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
54,289 | 56,845 | 80,951 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 539,025 | $ | 608,071 | $ | 656,741 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net interest income
|
$ | 17,862 | $ | 18,304 | $ | 18,450 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest rate spread
|
3.60 | % | 3.21 | % | 3.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net interest margin
|
3.72 | % | 3.35 | % | 3.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
|
111.99 | % | 109.61 | % | 108.76 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Average loan balances include nonaccrual loans.
28
Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to changes in both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.
|
2012 Compared to 2011
|
2011 Compared to 2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Increase (Decrease)
Due to
|
Increase (Decrease)
Due to
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
Net
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
Net
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
(In Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interest income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loans receivable
|
$ | (2,981 | ) | $ | (999 | ) | $ | (3,980 | ) | $ | (3,111 | ) | $ | 324 | $ | (2,787 | ) | |||||||
|
Investment securities
|
950 | (746 | ) | 204 | (51 | ) | (983 | ) | (1,034 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Daily interest-bearing deposits and other interest-earning assets
|
(92 | ) | (34 | ) | (126 | ) | 35 | 77 | 112 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
(2,123 | ) | (1,779 | ) | (3,902 | ) | (3,127 | ) | (582 | ) | (3,709 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Interest expense:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deposits
|
(571 | ) | (2,065 | ) | (2,636 | ) | 6 | (2,457 | ) | (2,451 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Borrowings
|
(760 | ) | (73 | ) | (833 | ) | (1,007 | ) | (99 | ) | (1,106 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Subordinated debentures
|
5 | 4 | 9 | 5 | (11 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
(1,326 | ) | (2,134 | ) | (3,460 | ) | (996 | ) | (2,567 | ) | (3,563 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Net change in interest income
|
$ | (797 | ) | $ | 355 | $ | (442 | ) | $ | (2,131 | ) | $ | 1,984 | $ | (147 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for Loan Losses.
The provision for loan losses for fiscal 2012 was $9.9 million compared to a provision of $4.4 million for fiscal 2011. Management reviews the level of the allowance for loan losses on a monthly basis and establishes the provision for loan losses based on changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, the amount of impaired and classified loans, historical loan loss experience and other qualitative factors. Net charge-offs for the year ended June 30, 2012 amounted to $12.2 million compared to $5.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2011. A significant portion of the loan charge-offs during fiscal 2012 were against specific reserves and did not require replenishment of the allowance for loan losses.
An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses is presented under “Allowance for Loan Losses and Asset Quality.”
29
Noninterest Income. The following table shows the components of noninterest income and the percentage changes from 2012 to 2011.
|
2012
|
2011
|
% Change
2012/2011
|
||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Mortgage origination fees
|
$ | 306 | $ | 481 | (36.4 | %) | ||||||
|
Service charges and fees
|
1,106 | 1,288 | (14.1 | ) | ||||||||
|
Gain on investment securities
|
50 | 2,057 | (97.6 | ) | ||||||||
|
Impairment on investment securities
|
(29 | ) | (835 | ) | (96.5 | ) | ||||||
|
Loss on sale of fixed assets
|
(12 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
|
Loss on foreclosed real estate
|
(169 | ) | (681 | ) | (75.2 | ) | ||||||
|
BOLI increase in cash value
|
236 | 235 | 0.4 | |||||||||
|
Other
|
692 | 688 | 0.6 | |||||||||
|
Total noninterest income
|
$ | 2,180 | $ | 3,233 | (32.6 | %) | ||||||
For the year ended June 30, 2012, noninterest income decreased $1.1 million to $2.2 million compared to $3.2 million for fiscal 2011. Gain on investment securities totaled $50,000 for fiscal 2012 compared to $2.1 million for fiscal 2011. Impairment of investment securities totaled $29,000 for fiscal 2012 compared to $835,000 for fiscal 2011. The impairment charge for fiscal 2011 relates to the Company’s holdings in three collateralized debt obligations that were acquired in connection with the acquisition of State of Franklin Bancshares where the decline in value was deemed to be other-than-temporary. Loss on sale of foreclosed property decreased $512,000 to $169,000 for fiscal 2012 compared to $681,000 for fiscal 2011. Service charges and fees decreased $182,000, or 14.1%, to $1.1 million for fiscal 2012 primarily due to lower NSF fees.
Noninterest Expense. The following table shows the components of noninterest expense and the percentage changes from 2012 to 2011.
|
2012
|
2011
|
% Change
2012/2011
|
||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Compensation and benefits
|
$ | 6,209 | $ | 6,687 | (7.1 | %) | ||||||
|
Occupancy
|
1,379 | 1,374 | 0.4 | |||||||||
|
Equipment and data processing
|
2,376 | 2,498 | (4.9 | ) | ||||||||
|
Deposit insurance premiums
|
811 | 664 | 22.1 | |||||||||
|
Advertising
|
359 | 376 | (4.5 | ) | ||||||||
|
Professional services
|
442 | 449 | (1.6 | ) | ||||||||
|
Valuation adjustment and expenses on OREO
|
2,374 | 1,841 | 29.0 | |||||||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
— | 775 | (100.0 | ) | ||||||||
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
441 | 497 | (11.3 | ) | ||||||||
|
Other
|
2,302 | 2,250 | 2.3 | |||||||||
|
Total noninterest expense
|
$ | 16,693 | $ | 17,411 | (4.1 | %) | ||||||
For the year ended June 30, 2012, noninterest expense decreased $718,000 to $16.7 million compared to $17.4 million for fiscal 2011. Noninterest expense for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 included prepayment penalties of $775,000 incurred on the early payoff of FHLB advances. Compensation expense decreased $478,000, or 7.1%, to $6.2 million for fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011 due to employee attrition. Valuation adjustments and expenses on other real estate owned increased $533,000 to $2.4 million for fiscal 2012 compared to $1.8 million for fiscal 2011.
30
Income Taxes.
For the year ended June 30, 2012, income tax benefit was $2.5 million compared to a tax benefit of $351,000 for the year ended June 30, 2011.
Balance Sheet Analysis
Loans. Net loans decreased $56.1 million, or 14.8%, to $322.5 million at June 30, 2012 compared to $378.6 million at June 30, 2011. Loan payments and payoffs exceeded loan originations during fiscal 2012 as the downturn in the economy has resulted in weakened loan demand. Our primary lending activity is the origination of loans secured by real estate. We originate real estate loans secured by one- to four-family homes, commercial real estate, multi-family real estate and land. We also originate construction loans and home equity loans. At June 30, 2012, real estate loans totaled $290.8 million, or 88.5% of our total loans, compared to $320.9 million, or 82.9% of total loans, at June 30, 2011. Real estate loans decreased $30.1 million, or 9.4%, in fiscal 2012.
31
The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.
|
At June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amount
|
Percent
|
Amount
|
Percent
|
Amount
|
Percent
|
Amount
|
Percent
|
Amount
|
Percent
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real estate loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residential one- to four-family
|
$ | 97,182 | 29.6 | % | $ | 110,046 | 28.4 | % | $ | 136,430 | 30.7 | % | $ | 144,659 | 28.7 | % | $ | 63,340 | 22.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
18,395 | 5.6 | 20,029 | 5.2 | 19,768 | 4.4 | 22,467 | 4.5 | 5,723 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial
|
127,185 | 38.7 | 144,519 | 37.3 | 140,024 | 31.5 | 159,608 | 31.7 | 90,933 | 32.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Multi-family
|
11,564 | 3.5 | 14,062 | 3.6 | 16,536 | 3.7 | 6,584 | 1.3 | 4,219 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Construction
|
548 | 0.2 | 2,171 | 0.6 | 21,073 | 4.7 | 40,831 | 8.1 | 19,553 | 6.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Land
|
27,487 | 8.4 | 30,053 | 7.8 | 37,135 | 8.4 | 46,987 | 9.3 | 40,862 | 14.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total real estate loans
|
282,361 | 85.9 | 320,880 | 82.9 | 370,966 | 83.5 | 421,136 | 83.7 | 224,630 | 78.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial business loans
|
42,107 | 12.8 | 60,497 | 15.6 | 66,699 | 15.0 | 73,467 | 14.6 | 52,037 | 18.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-real estate loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Automobile loans
|
833 | 0.3 | 1,237 | 0.3 | 1,848 | 0.4 | 2,754 | 0.5 | 3,973 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mobile home loans
|
3 | 0.0 | 13 | 0.0 | 23 | 0.0 | 43 | 0.0 | 60 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loans secured by deposits
|
381 | 0.1 | 1,268 | 0.3 | 1,372 | 0.3 | 1,322 | 0.3 | 930 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other consumer loans
|
2,989 | 0.9 | 3,235 | 0.8 | 3,566 | 0.8 | 4,609 | 0.9 | 2,961 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total non-real estate loans
|
4,206 | 1.3 | 5,753 | 1.5 | 6,809 | 1.5 | 8,728 | 1.7 | 7,924 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total gross loans
|
328,674 | 100.0 | % | 387,130 | 100.0 | % | 444,474 | 100.0 | % | 503,331 | 100.00 | % | 284,591 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Less:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deferred loan fees, net
|
(323 | ) | (362 | ) | (447 | ) | (502 | ) | (272 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Allowance for losses
|
(5,852 | ) | (8,181 | ) | (9,649 | ) | (4,722 | ) | (1,836 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total loans receivable, net
|
$ | 322,499 | $ | 378,587 | $ | 434,378 | $ | 498,107 | $ | 282,483 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32
The following table sets forth certain information at June 30, 2012 regarding the dollar amount of principal repayments becoming due during the periods indicated for loans. The table does not include any estimate of prepayments which significantly shorten the average life of all loans and may cause our actual repayment experience to differ from that shown below. Demand loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no stated maturity are reported as due in one year or less.
|
Real Estate
Loans
|
Commercial
Business Loans
|
Consumer
Loans
|
Total
Loans
|
|||||||||||||
|
Amounts due in:
|
(In thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
One year or less
|
$ | 64,760 | $ | 23,003 | $ | 2,982 | $ | 90,745 | ||||||||
|
More than one to three years
|
63,081 | 10,217 | 1,024 | 74,322 | ||||||||||||
|
More than three to five years
|
52,791 | 6,201 | 193 | 59,185 | ||||||||||||
|
More than five to 15 years
|
39,554 | 2,686 | 7 | 42,247 | ||||||||||||
|
More than 15 years
|
62,175 | — | — | 62,175 | ||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 282,361 | $ | 42,107 | $ | 4,206 | $ | 328,674 | ||||||||
The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans at June 30, 2012 that are due after June 30, 2013 and have either fixed interest rates or floating or adjustable interest rates.
|
Fixed-Rates
|
Floating or
Adjustable Rates
|
Total
|
||||||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Real estate loans:
|
||||||||||||
|
One- to four-family
|
$ | 895 | $ | 16,926 | $ | 17,821 | ||||||
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
18,753 | 68,623 | 87,376 | |||||||||
|
Commercial
|
51,820 | 33,650 | 85,470 | |||||||||
|
Multi-family
|
5,794 | 4,740 | 10,534 | |||||||||
|
Construction
|
10,850 | 4,582 | 15,432 | |||||||||
|
Land
|
769 | 199 | 968 | |||||||||
|
Commercial business loans
|
6,221 | 12,883 | 19,104 | |||||||||
|
Consumer loans
|
1,203 | 21 | 1,224 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 96,305 | $ | 141,624 | $ | 237,929 | ||||||
The following table shows activity in our loan portfolio, excluding loans held for sale, during the periods indicated.
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Total loans at beginning of period
|
$ | 387,130 | $ | 444,474 | $ | 503,331 | ||||||
|
Loans originated:
|
||||||||||||
|
Real estate
|
21,219 | 25,706 | 27,420 | |||||||||
|
Commercial business
|
6,386 | 14,051 | 23,210 | |||||||||
|
Consumer
|
1,011 | 1,387 | 2,008 | |||||||||
|
Total loans originated
|
28,616 | 41,144 | 52,638 | |||||||||
|
Loan principal repayments
|
(87,072 | ) | (98,488 | ) | (111,495 | ) | ||||||
|
Net loan activity
|
(58,456 | ) | (57,344 | ) | (58,857 | ) | ||||||
|
Total gross loans at end of period
|
$ | 328,674 | $ | 387,130 | $ | 444,474 | ||||||
Investments. Our investment portfolio consists of U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, corporate securities, and municipal securities. Investment securities increased $8.7 million to $83.5 million at June 30, 2012 compared to $74.8 million at June 30, 2011 as the result of excess liquidity deployed into the investment portfolio. Investments classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair market value and reflect an unrealized gain of $1.8 million, or $1.1 million net of taxes. The increase in the investment portfolio reflects security purchases totaling $58.3 million, partially offset by sales, paydowns and calls of securities totaling approximately $50.1 million.
33
|
At June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Fair
Value
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Fair
Value
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal agency securities
|
$ | 24,033 | $ | 24,296 | $ | 43,721 | $ | 43,949 | $ | 31,975 | $ | 32,107 | ||||||||||||
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
52,822 | 54,415 | 24,551 | 25,356 | 5,650 | 24,313 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Municipal securities
|
4,245 | 4,563 | 5,150 | 5,237 | 21,812 | 5,764 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Other securities
|
609 | 209 | 613 | 238 | 1,597 | 805 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 81,709 | $ | 83,483 | $ | 74,035 | $ | 74,780 | $ | 61,034 | $ | 62,989 | ||||||||||||
The following table sets forth the maturities and weighted average yields of investment securities at June 30, 2012.
|
More than
One Year to
Five Years
|
More than
Five Years to
Ten Years
|
More than
Ten Years
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
Carrying
Value
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal agency securities
|
$ | 12,385 | 1.42 | % | $ | 3,018 | 2.27 | % | $ | 8,893 | 2.62 | % | $ | 24,296 | 1.97 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
53 | 3.76 | 9,192 | 1.24 | 45,051 | 2.42 | 54,296 | 2.22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Municipal securities
|
350 | 3.54 | 1,579 | 3.26 | 2,466 | 3.78 | 4,395 | 3.58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other securities
|
— | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | 207 | 0.00 | 207 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 12,788 | 1.49 | % | $ | 13,789 | 1.69 | % | $ | 56,617 | 2.48 | % | $ | 83,194 | 2.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Deposits. Our primary source of funds is our deposit accounts. The deposit base is comprised of checking, savings, money market and time deposits. These deposits are provided primarily by individuals and businesses within our market area. We do not use brokered deposits as a source of funding. Total deposits decreased $30.4 million, to $423.9 million at June 30, 2012 primarily due to the planned runoff of higher cost certificates of deposit. Certificates of deposit decreased $40.5 million, or 19.2%, to $170.4 million while transaction accounts increased $10.1 million to $253.5 million at June 30, 2012 compared to $243.4 million at June 30, 2011. Management monitors the deposit mix and deposit pricing on a regular basis and has focused on growth in lower cost transaction accounts. Our deposit pricing strategy is to offer competitive rates, but not to offer the highest deposit rates in our markets.
|
At June 30,
|
||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Noninterest-bearing accounts
|
$ | 52,436 | $ | 54,340 | $ | 41,653 | ||||||
|
NOW accounts
|
52,958 | 46,134 | 58,257 | |||||||||
|
Passbook accounts
|
96,588 | 91,637 | 82,830 | |||||||||
|
Money market deposit accounts
|
51,492 | 51,252 | 56,247 | |||||||||
|
Certificates of deposit
|
170,408 | 210,899 | 240,196 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 423,882 | $ | 454,262 | $ | 479,183 | ||||||
34
The following table indicates the amount of jumbo certificates of deposit by time remaining until maturity as of June 30, 2012. Jumbo certificates of deposit require minimum deposits of $100,000.
|
Certificates
of Deposit
|
||||
|
Maturity Period
|
(In thousands)
|
|||
|
Three months or less
|
$ | 12,450 | ||
|
Over three through six months
|
16,707 | |||
|
Over six through twelve months
|
12,818 | |||
|
Over twelve months
|
25,527 | |||
|
Total
|
$ | 67,502 | ||
The following table sets forth the time deposits classified by rates at the dates indicated.
|
At June 30,
|
||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
0.01 – 1.00%
|
$ | 129,619 | $ | 82,706 | $ | — | ||||||
|
1.01 – 2.00%
|
36,538 | 108,257 | 183,723 | |||||||||
|
2.01 – 3.00%
|
2,313 | 8,046 | 22,211 | |||||||||
|
3.01 – 4.00%
|
64 | 4,963 | 22,273 | |||||||||
|
4.01 – 5.00%
|
1,874 | 6,927 | 11,989 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 170,408 | $ | 210,899 | $ | 240,196 | ||||||
The following table sets forth the amount and maturities of time deposits at June 30, 2012.
|
At June 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Less Than
One Year
|
1-2
Years
|
2-3
Years
|
3-4
Years
|
4 or More
Years
|
Total
|
Percent of Total Certificate Accounts
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In Thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.01 – 1.00%
|
$ | 115,080 | $ | 9,328 | $ | 4,217 | $ | 786 | $ | 208 | $ | 129,619 | 76.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
1.01 – 2.00%
|
6,930 | 17,866 | 10,013 | 213 | 1,516 | 36,538 | 21.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2.01 – 3.00%
|
1,764 | 463 | 86 | — | — | 2,313 | 1.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
3.01 – 4.00%
|
30 | 34 | — | — | — | 64 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
4.01 – 5.00%
|
1,227 | 647 | — | — | — | 1,874 | 1.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 125,031 | $ | 28,338 | $ | 14,316 | $ | 999 | $ | 1,724 | $ | 170,408 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Borrowings. We have relied upon advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Cincinnati to supplement our supply of lendable funds and to meet deposit withdrawal requirements. FHLB advances remained relatively stable at $37.9 million at June 30, 2012 compared to June 30, 2011. The following table presents certain information regarding our use of FHLB advances during the periods and at the dates indicated.
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Maximum amount of advances outstanding at any month end
|
$ | 37,936 | $ | 85,104 | $ | 90,269 | ||||||
|
Average advances outstanding
|
$ | 37,906 | $ | 60,459 | $ | 89,241 | ||||||
|
Weighted average interest rate during the period
|
2.77 | % | 3.48 | % | 3.59 | % | ||||||
|
Balance outstanding at end of period
|
$ | 37,863 | $ | 37,942 | $ | 84,834 | ||||||
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of period
|
2.77 | % | 2.77 | % | 4.08 | % | ||||||
35
Stockholders’ Equity. Stockholders’ equity was $52.6 million at June 30, 2012 compared to $55.9 million at June 30, 2011. The Bank’s total risk-based capital ratio was 13.42% at June 30, 2012, compared to 13.00% at June 30, 2011. During the year ended June 30, 2012, there were 2,534 shares of Company common stock purchased through the Company’s stock repurchase program at a cost of $7,000. At June 30, 2012, an additional 437,752 shares remained eligible for repurchase under the current stock repurchase program. Unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, in the available-for-sale investment portfolio are reflected as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity. At June 30, 2012, the adjustment to stockholders’ equity was a net unrealized gain of $1.1 million compared to a net unrealized gain of $459,000 at June 30, 2011.
Allowance for Loan Losses and Asset Quality
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. We evaluate the need to establish reserves against losses on loans on a monthly basis. When additional reserves are necessary, a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings.
In connection with assessing the allowance, we have established a systematic methodology for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. The methodology segments loans with similar risk characteristics. Management performs a monthly assessment of the allowance for loan losses based on the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, the amount of impaired and classified loans and historical loan loss experience. In addition, management considers other qualitative factors, including delinquency trends, economic conditions and loan considerations.
The Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions and the FDIC, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our allowance for loan losses. The Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions and FDIC may require us to make additional provisions for loan losses based on judgments different from ours.
The allowance for loan losses decreased $2.3 million to $5.9 million at June 30, 2012. Primarily as a result of management’s evaluation of credit quality and current economic conditions, the provision for loan losses was $9.9 million for fiscal 2012, compared to a provision of $4.4 million for fiscal 2011. Net charge-offs were $12.2 million for fiscal 2012 compared to $5.9 million for fiscal 2011. Net charge-offs for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 were primarily attributable to commercial business loans. At June 30, 2012, our allowance for loan losses represented 1.78% of total gross loans and 31.53% of nonperforming loans, compared to 2.11% of total gross loans and 99.2% of nonperforming loans at June 30, 2011. A significant portion of the loan charge-offs during fiscal 2012 were against specific reserves and did not require replenishment of the allowance for loan losses.
Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and results of operations could be adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations. Furthermore, while we believe we have established our allowance for loan losses in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing our loan portfolio, will not request us to increase our allowance for loan losses. In addition, because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate or that increases will not be necessary should the quality of any loans deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed above. Any material increase in the allowance for loan losses may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
36
Summary of Loan Loss Experience. The following table sets forth an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated. Where specific loan loss reserves have been established, any difference between the loss reserve and the amount of loss realized has been charged or credited to current income.
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Allowance at beginning of period
|
$ | 8,181 | $ | 9,649 | $ | 4,722 | $ | 1,836 | $ | 1,955 | ||||||||||
|
Provision for loan losses
|
9,873 | 4,447 | 8,809 | 910 | 451 | |||||||||||||||
|
Reserve for acquired bank
|
— | — | — | 2,577 | — | |||||||||||||||
|
Recoveries:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real estate loans
|
12 | 110 | 7 | 22 | 28 | |||||||||||||||
|
Commercial business loans
|
897 | 91 | 3 | 29 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
|
Consumer loans
|
25 | 18 | 51 | 63 | 75 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total recoveries
|
934 | 219 | 61 | 114 | 115 | |||||||||||||||
|
Charge offs:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real estate loans
|
(4,363 | ) | (3,853 | ) | (1,955 | ) | (220 | ) | (497 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Commercial business loans
|
(8,673 | ) | (2,150 | ) | (1,869 | ) | (327 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Consumer loans
|
(100 | ) | (131 | ) | ( 119 | ) | (168 | ) | (158 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Total charge-offs
|
(13,136 | ) | (6,134 | ) | (3,943 | ) | (715 | ) | (685 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Net charge-offs
|
(12,202 | ) | (5,915 | ) | (3,882 | ) | (601 | ) | (570 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Allowance at end of period
|
$ | 5,852 | $ | 8,181 | $ | 9,649 | $ | 4,722 | $ | 1,836 | ||||||||||
|
Allowance to nonperforming loans
|
31.53 | % | 99.19 | % | 51.38 | % | 78.30 | % | 609.97 | % | ||||||||||
|
Allowance to total gross loans outstanding at the end of the period
|
1.78 | % | 2.11 | % | 2.17 | % | 0.94 | % | 0.65 | % | ||||||||||
|
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding during the period
|
3.36 | % | 1.42 | % | 0.83 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.20 | % | ||||||||||
The following table sets forth the breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan category at the dates indicated.
|
At June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amount
|
% of
Allowance
to Total
Allowance
|
% of
Loans in
Category
to Total
Loans
|
Amount
|
% of
Allowance
to Total
Allowance
|
% of
Loans in
Category
to Total
Loans
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Real estate
|
$ | 3,700 | 63.2 | % | 85.9 | % | $ | 6,941 | 84.8 | % | 80.8 | % | ||||||||||||
|
Commercial business
|
2,130 | 36.4 | 12.8 | 1,197 | 14.6 | 17.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Consumer
|
22 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 43 | 0.5 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Unallocated
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
$ | 5,852 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | $ | 8,181 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
37
|
At June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amount
|
% of
Allowance
to Total
Allowance
|
% of
Loans in
Category
to Total
Loans
|
Amount
|
% of
Allowance
to Total
Allowance
|
% of Loans in
Category
to Total
Loans
|
Amount
|
% of
Allowance
to Total
Allowance
|
% of
Loans in
Category
to Total
Loans
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real estate
|
$ | 7,857 | 81.4 | % | 83.5 | % | $ | 3,819 | 80.9 | % | 83.7 | % | $ | 1,448 | 78.9 | % | 78.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial business
|
1,675 | 17.4 | 15.0 | 755 | 16.0 | 14.6 | 235 | 12.8 | 18.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consumer
|
117 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 148 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 153 | 8.3 | 2.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unallocated
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
$ | 9,649 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | $ | 4,722 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,836 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Nonperforming and Classified Assets. When a loan becomes 90 days delinquent, the loan is placed on nonaccrual status at which time the accrual of interest ceases and the reserve for any uncollectible accrued interest is established and charged against operations. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash basis or cost-recovery method until the loan is returned to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when future payments are reasonably assured. Payments received on non-accrual loans are applied to the remaining principal balance of the loans.
We consider repossessed assets and loans that are 90 days or more past due to be nonperforming assets. Real estate that we acquire as a result of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned until it is sold. When property is acquired, it is recorded at the lower of its cost, which is the unpaid balance of the loan plus foreclosure costs, or fair market value at the date of foreclosure. Holding costs and declines in fair value after acquisition of the property result in charges against income.
Nonperforming assets increased to $25.2 million, or 4.82% of total assets, at June 30, 2012, compared to $18.2 million, or 3.25% at June 30, 2011 as a result of an increase in nonaccrual loans. Nonaccrual loans totaled $18.6 million at June 30, 2012 compared to $8.2 million at June 30, 2011. The increase in nonaccrual loans is primarily driven by the real estate segments of the portfolio. Nonaccrual loans with a current payment status were approximately 62% of the balance at June 30, 2012. Foreclosed real estate decreased $3.4 million to $6.1 million at June 30, 2012. At June 30, 2012, foreclosed real estate consisted of 934,000 of single family homes, $1.1 million of vacant land, subdivision developments totaling $3.0 and commercial real estate totaling $1.1 million.
Under current accounting guidelines, a loan is defined as impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. We consider consumer installment loans to be homogeneous and, therefore, do not separately evaluate them for impairment. All other loans are evaluated for impairment on an individual basis. At June 30, 2012, impaired loans totaled $24.4 million.
Troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) loans were $10.8 million at June 30, 2012. A TDR exists when we grant a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty that we normally would not otherwise consider. These concessions can result in avoidance of foreclosure proceedings and can result in the full repayment of the loan principal amount. Troubled debt restructurings are considered to be nonperforming, except for those that have established a sufficient performance history (generally at a minimum of six consecutive months of performance under the restructured terms) under the terms for the restructured loan. The majority of the Bank’s TDRs involve a modification in loan terms such as a temporary period of interest only or extension of the maturity date. The majority of loans in this category are in compliance with their modified loan terms as of June 30, 2012. The amount of accruing TDR loans totaled $2.3 million at June 30, 2012. Additional information on all of our troubled debt restructurings appears in the troubled debt restructurings table below.
38
The following table provides information with respect to our nonperforming assets at the dates indicated.
|
At June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real estate
|
$ | 9,040 | $ | 5,401 | $ | 17,367 | $ | 5,724 | $ | 139 | ||||||||||
|
Commercial business
|
1,034 | 848 | 1,309 | 252 | 162 | |||||||||||||||
|
Consumer
|
33 | 41 | 103 | 55 | — | |||||||||||||||
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
10,107 | 6,290 | 18,779 | 6,031 | 301 | |||||||||||||||
|
Nonaccrual restructured loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real estate
|
8,140 | 1,531 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
Commercial business
|
315 | 427 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
Consumer
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
Total nonaccrual restructured loans
|
8,455 | 1,958 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
18,562 | 8,248 | 18,779 | 6,031 | 301 | |||||||||||||||
|
Nonaccrual investments
|
207 | 464 | 731 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
Real estate owned
|
6,075 | 9,498 | 6,865 | 3,328 | 462 | |||||||||||||||
|
Other nonperforming assets(1)
|
348 | 1 | — | 106 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
$ | 25,192 | $ | 18,211 | $ | 26,375 | $ | 9,465 | $ | 768 | ||||||||||
|
Accruing restructured loans
|
$ | 2,304 | $ | 13,821 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
|
Accruing restructured loans and nonperforming loans
|
$ | 20,866 | $ | 22,069 | $ | 18,779 | $ | 6,031 | $ | 301 | ||||||||||
|
Total nonperforming loans to total loans
|
5.65 | % | 2.13 | % | 4.22 | % | 1.20 | % | 0.11 | % | ||||||||||
|
Total nonperforming loans to total assets
|
3.55 | % | 1.47 | % | 2.98 | % | 0.91 | % | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||
|
Total nonperforming assets to total assets
|
4.82 | % | 3.25 | % | 4.18 | % | 1.43 | % | 0.23 | % | ||||||||||
(1) Consists primarily of repossessed automobiles and mobile homes.
Interest income that would have been recorded for the years ended June 30, 2012, and 2011 had nonaccruing loans and accruing restructured loans been current according to their original terms was $1.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively. Interest related to nonaccrual loans or accruing restructured loans totaling $162,000 and $169,000 was included in interest income for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
We review and classify our assets on a regular basis. In addition, the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions has the authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. There are three classifications for problem assets: substandard, doubtful and loss. “Substandard assets” must have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. “Doubtful assets” have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss. An asset classified “loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution is not warranted. The regulations also provide for a “special mention” category, described as assets which do not currently expose us to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving our close attention. When we classify an asset as substandard or doubtful we must establish a general allowance for loan losses. If we classify an asset as loss, we must either establish specific allowances for loan losses in the amount of 100% of the portion of the asset classified loss or charge off such amount.
39
The following table shows the aggregate amounts of our classified assets at the dates indicated.
|
At June 30,
|
||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||
|
Substandard assets
|
$ | 28,886 | $ | 35,153 | $ | 30,747 | ||||||
|
Doubtful assets
|
— | — | — | |||||||||
|
Loss assets
|
— | — | — | |||||||||
|
Total classified assets
|
$ | 28,886 | $ | 35,153 | $ | 30,747 | ||||||
At each of the dates in the above table, substandard assets consisted of nonperforming assets plus other loans that we believed exhibited weakness. These substandard but performing loans totaled $11.8 million, $27.4 million and $13.3 million at June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At June 30, 2012, we also had $30.4 million of loans that we were monitoring because of concerns about the borrowers’ ability to continue to make payments in the future, none of which were nonperforming or classified as substandard.
Delinquencies. The following table provides information about delinquencies in our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.
|
At June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
30-59 Days
Past Due
|
60-89 Days
Past Due
|
30-59 Days
Past Due
|
60-89 Days
Past Due
|
30-59 Days
Past Due
|
60-89 Days
Past Due
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Real estate loans
|
$ | 1,381 | $ | 372 | $ | 3,006 | $ | 449 | $ | 2,665 | $ | 1,612 | ||||||||||||
|
Commercial business loans
|
133 | — | 137 | 808 | 647 | 207 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Consumer loans
|
17 | — | 24 | — | 104 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 1,531 | $ | 372 | $ | 3,167 | $ | 1,257 | $ | 3,416 | $ | 1,826 | ||||||||||||
At June 30, 2012, 2011 and 2010, delinquent loans consisted primarily of loans secured by commercial and residential real estate.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments, maturities and sales of investment securities and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.
We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of (1) expected loan demand, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities and (4) the objectives of our asset/liability management program. Excess liquid assets are invested generally in interest-earning deposits and short- and intermediate-term U.S. Government agency obligations. The Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) is responsible for monitoring and implementing liquidity strategies and contingency plans that address the Company’s ongoing liquidity needs.
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents and interest-bearing deposits. The levels of these assets are dependent on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At June 30, 2012, cash and cash equivalents totaled $3.0 million and interest-bearing deposits totaled $53.7 million. Securities classified as available-for-sale, which provide additional sources of liquidity, totaled $83.5 million at June 30, 2012. At June 30, 2012, approximately $13.0 million of the investment portfolio was pledged as collateral
40
for municipal deposits, FHLB borrowings and repurchase agreements. The Company’s external sources of liquidity include borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, and other correspondent banks. At June 30, 2012, borrowing capacity with the FHLB totaled $52.7 million based on pledged collateral, of which $15.0 million was unused. For the year ended June 30, 2012, FHLB advances remained relatively unchanged at $37.9 million compared to June 30, 2011. Additional eligible collateral may be transferred to the FHLB to increase borrowing capacity. The Company can borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s discount window to meet short-term liquidity requirements. At June 30, 2012, the Company had approximately $16.1 million of unused borrowing capacity based on pledged collateral with the Federal Reserve Bank discount window. In addition, the Company also maintains unsecured federal funds lines with two correspondent banks totaling $18.5 million under which no borrowings were outstanding. These federal funds lines may be terminated at any time and may not be outstanding for more than 14 consecutive days.
At June 30, 2012, we had 8.5 million in unused lines of credit. Certificates of deposit due within one year of June 30, 2012 totaled $125.0 million. We believe, based on past experience, that a significant portion of those deposits will remain with us. We have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.
The following table presents certain of our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2012.
|
Payments due by period
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Contractual Obligations
|
Total
|
Less than
1 year
|
1-3 years
|
3-5 years
|
More than 5 years
|
|||||||||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
$ | 37,863 | $ | — | $ | 32,075 | $ | — | $ | 5,788 | ||||||||
|
Subordinated debentures
|
10,001 | — | — | — | 10,001 | |||||||||||||
|
Capital lease obligations
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
|
Operating lease obligations
|
28 | 19 | 9 | — | — | |||||||||||||
|
Purchase obligations
|
2,784 | 1,062 | 1,710 | 12 | — | |||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 50,676 | $ | 1,081 | $ | 33,794 | $ | 12 | $ | 15,789 | ||||||||
Our primary investing activities are the origination of loans and the purchase of securities. In the year ended June 30, 2012, we originated $28.6 million of loans. In fiscal 2011, we originated $41.1 million of loans and in fiscal 2010 we originated $52.6 million of loans.
Financing activities consist primarily of activity in deposit accounts and Federal Home Loan Bank advances. We experienced a net decrease in total deposits of $30.4 million in the year ended June 30, 2012, a net decrease in total deposits of $24.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2011 and a net decrease in total deposits of $3.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Deposit flows are affected by the overall level of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by us and our local competitors and other factors. We generally manage the pricing of our deposits to be competitive and to increase core deposit relationships. Occasionally, we offer promotional rates on certain deposit products in order to attract deposits. Federal Home Loan Bank advance activity reflected a decrease of $79,000 at June 30, 2012 and a decrease of $46.9 million and $5.5 million at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal prompt corrective action regulations, including a risk-based capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. At June 30, 2012, we exceeded all of our regulatory capital requirements. We are considered “well capitalized” under regulatory guidelines. See “Regulation of the Bank—Capital Requirements.”
Jefferson Bancshares is a separate entity and apart from Jefferson Federal and must provide for its own liquidity. In addition to its operating expenses, Jefferson Bancshares is responsible for the payment of dividends declared for its shareholders, and interest and principal on outstanding debt. At times, Jefferson Bancshares has redeemed its stock. Substantially all of Jefferson Bancshares’ revenues are obtained from subsidiary service fees
41
and dividends. Payment of such dividends to Jefferson Bancshares by Jefferson Federal is limited under Tennessee law. The amount that can be paid in any calendar year, without prior approval from the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions, cannot exceed the total of Jefferson Federal’s net income for the year combined with its retained net income for the preceding two years. Jefferson Bancshares believes that such restriction will not have an impact on its ability to meet its ongoing cash obligations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments, unused lines of credit, amounts due mortgagors on construction loans, amounts due on commercial loans and commercial letters of credit.
For the three months and year ended June 30, 2012, we engaged in no off-balance-sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Impact of New Accounting Pronouncements
The impact of new accounting pronouncements is discussed in Note 4 to the Company’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 and incorporated herein by reference.
Effect of Inflation and Changing Prices
The financial statements and related financial data presented in this prospectus have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation on our operations is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than do general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.
Qualitative Aspects of Market Risk. Our most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. We manage the interest rate sensitivity of our interest-bearing liabilities and interest-earning assets in an effort to minimize the adverse effects of changes in the interest rate environment. Deposit accounts typically react more quickly to changes in market interest rates than mortgage loans because of the shorter maturities of deposits. As a result, sharp increases in interest rates may adversely affect our earnings while decreases in interest rates may beneficially affect our earnings. To reduce the potential volatility of our earnings, we have sought to improve the match between asset and liability maturities and rates, while maintaining an acceptable interest rate spread. Pursuant to this strategy, we actively originate adjustable-rate mortgage loans for retention in our loan portfolio. These loans generally reprice beginning after five years and annually thereafter. Most of our residential adjustable-rate mortgage loans may not adjust downward below their initial interest rate. Although historically we have been successful in originating adjustable-rate mortgage loans, the ability to originate such loans depends to a great extent on market interest rates and borrowers’ preferences. This product enables us to compete in the fixed-rate mortgage market while maintaining a shorter maturity. Fixed-rate mortgage loans typically have an adverse effect on interest rate sensitivity compared to adjustable-rate loans. In recent years, we have used investment securities with terms of seven years or less and mortgage-backed securities to help manage interest rate risk. We currently do not participate in hedging programs, interest rate swaps or other activities involving the use of off-balance sheet derivative financial instruments.
We have established an Asset/Liability Committee to communicate, coordinate and monitor all aspects involving asset/liability management. The committee establishes and monitors the volume and mix of assets and funding sources with the objective of managing assets and funding sources to produce results that are consistent with liquidity, capital adequacy, growth, risk limits and profitability goals.
42
Quantitative Aspects of Market Risk. We monitor the impact of changes in interest rates on our net interest income and present value of equity using rate shock analysis. The present value of equity is defined as the present value of assets minus the present value of liabilities. This analysis assesses the risk of loss in market risk sensitive instruments in the event of a sudden and sustained 100 to 400 basis point increase or 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counter the effect of that interest rate movement. Because of the low level of market interest rates, this analysis is not performed for decreases of more than 100 basis points. We measure interest rate risk by modeling the changes in net portfolio value over a variety of interest rate scenarios.
The following table presents the estimated impact on net interest income and equity due to immediate changes in interest rates at the specified levels at June 30, 2012:
|
Change In:
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Change in Interest Rates
(In Basis Points)
|
Net Interest Income
|
Economic Value of Equity
|
|||||||||||||||
|
$ Change
|
% Change
|
Market Value
|
Change
|
||||||||||||||
| 400 | $ | 19,492 | 15.3 | % | $ | 67,495 | (4.4 | )% | |||||||||
| 300 | 18,403 | 8.9 | 67,331 | (4.7 | ) | ||||||||||||
| 200 | 17,391 | 2.9 | 68,105 | (3.6 | ) | ||||||||||||
| 100 | 16,895 | (0.1 | ) | 69,607 | (1.4 | ) | |||||||||||
|
No change
|
16,904 | 0.0 | 70,617 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
| (100 | ) | 16,292 | (3.6 | )% | 69,689 | (1.3 | )% | ||||||||||
We use certain assumptions in assessing interest rate risk that relate to interest rates, loan prepayment rates, deposit decay rates and the market values of certain assets under differing interest rate scenarios, among others. As with any method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgage loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from certificates could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the table.
The financial statements required by this Item are incorporated by reference to the Company’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements found on pages F-1 through F-38 hereto.
None.
43
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
The Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In addition, based on that evaluation, no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting is incorporated by reference to page 49.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
None.
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
The information relating to the directors and officers of Jefferson Bancshares and information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is incorporated herein by reference to Jefferson Bancshares’ Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”) and to Part I, Item 1, “Description of Business—Executive Officers of the Registrant.” The information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned “Other Information Relating to Directors and Executive Officers—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement.
Jefferson Bancshares has adopted a written code of ethics, which applies to our senior financial officers. We intend to disclose any changes or waivers from our Code of Ethics applicable to any senior financial officers on our website at http://www.jeffersonfederal.com or in a Current Report on Form 8-K. A copy of the Code of Ethics is available, without charge, upon written request to Jane P. Hutton, Corporate Secretary, Jefferson Bancshares, Inc., 120 Evans Avenue, Morristown, Tennessee 37814.
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
The information contained under the sections captioned “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS
|
|
(a)
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners. The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned “Stock Ownership” in the Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Security Ownership of Management. The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned “Stock Ownership” in the Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
(c)
|
Changes in Control. Management of Jefferson Bancshares knows of no arrangements, including any pledge by any person of securities of Jefferson Bancshares, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the registrant.
|
44
|
(d)
|
Equity Compensation Plan Information.
|
The following table provides information as of June 30, 2012 for compensation plans under which equity securities may be issued. Jefferson Bancshares does not maintain any equity compensation plans that have not been approved by security holders.
|
Plan category
|
Number of securities
to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(a)
|
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(b)
|
Number of securities
remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
(c)
|
|||||||||
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
340,638 | $ | 13.69 | 358,112 | ||||||||
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
–– | –– | ||||||||||
|
Total
|
340,638 | $ | 358,112 | |||||||||
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
The information required by this item relating to certain relationships and related transactions is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned “Other Information Relating to Directors and Executive Officers—Transactions with Management” in the Proxy Statement. The information required by this item relating to director independence is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned “Items to Be Voted Upon By Shareholders—Item I—Election of Directors” in the Proxy Statement.
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned “Items to Be Voted Upon By Shareholders—Item 2—Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement.
45
|
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
|
|
(a)
|
(1)
|
The exhibits and financial statement schedules filed as a part of this report are as follows: | |||
|
•
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
||||
|
•
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets for the Years Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
|
||||
|
•
|
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Years Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
|
||||
|
•
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
|
||||
|
•
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
|
||||
|
•
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
||||
|
(2)
|
All schedules are omitted as the required information either is not applicable or is included in the financial statements or related notes. | ||||
|
(3)
|
Exhibits | ||||
|
3.1
|
Charter of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. (1)
|
|||
|
3.2
|
Bylaws of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. (2)
|
|||
|
4.1
|
Specimen Stock Certificate of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. (1)
|
|||
|
4.2
|
No long-term debt instrument issued by Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. exceeds 10% of consolidated assets or is registered. In accordance with paragraph 4(iii) of Item 601(b) of Regulation S-K, Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. will furnish the Securities and Exchange Commission copies of long-term debt instruments and related agreements upon request.
|
|||
| 10.1 |
Employment Agreement between Anderson L. Smith, Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. and Jefferson Federal Bank* (3)
|
|||
|
10.2
|
||||
|
10.3
|
||||
|
10.4
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Anderson L. Smith, Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. and Jefferson Federal Bank* (4)
|
|||
| 10.5 |
Jefferson Federal Savings and Loan Association of Morristown Employee Severance Compensation Plan* (1)
|
|||
| 10.6 |
1995 Jefferson Federal Savings and Loan Association Stock Option Plan* (1)
|
|||
|
10.7
|
Jefferson Federal Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan* (1)
|
|||
|
10.8
|
Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. 2004 Stock-Based Incentive Plan* (5)
|
|||
|
11.0
|
Statement re: computation of per share earnings (6)
|
|||
|
21.0
|
||||
|
23.0
|
||||
|
31.1
|
||||
|
31.2
|
||||
|
32.0
|
||||
|
101.0
|
The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Condition, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Earnings, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.**
|
46
|
*
|
Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
|
||
|
**
|
To be furnished by amendment.
|
||
|
(1)
|
Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to Registration Statement on Form S-1 and amendments thereto, initially filed on March 21, 2003, Registration No. 333-103961.
|
||
|
(2)
|
Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 26, 2007.
|
||
|
(3)
|
Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on September 29, 2003.
|
||
|
(4)
|
Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on September 13, 2004.
|
||
|
(5)
|
Incorporated herein by reference from Appendix A to the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed on December 1, 2003.
|
||
|
(6)
|
Incorporated herein by reference to Note 3 to the Company’s Audited Financial Statements beginning on page F-11.
|
||
47
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. | ||
|
Date: September 21, 2012
|
By:
|
/s/ Anderson L. Smith
|
|
Anderson L. Smith
|
||
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
||
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
Name
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
|
/s/ Anderson L. Smith
|
President, Chief Executive
|
September 21, 2012
|
||
|
Anderson L. Smith
|
Officer and Director
|
|||
|
(principal executive officer)
|
||||
|
/s/ Jane P. Hutton
|
Chief Financial Officer,
|
September 21, 2012
|
||
|
Jane P. Hutton
|
Treasurer and Secretary
|
|||
|
(principal financial and accounting officer)
|
||||
|
/s/ H. Scott Reams
|
|
Director
|
September 21, 2012
|
|
|
H. Scott Reams
|
||||
|
/s/ Dr. Jack E. Campbell
|
Director
|
September 21, 2012
|
||
|
Dr. Jack E. Campbell
|
||||
|
/s/ Dr. Terry M. Brimer
|
Director
|
September 21, 2012
|
||
|
Dr. Terry M. Brimer
|
||||
|
/s/ William T. Hale
|
Director
|
September 21, 2012
|
||
| William T. Hale |
48
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. The Company’s management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012 based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2012 based on the specified criteria. This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
49
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors
Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Morristown, Tennessee
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Craine, Thompson & Jones, P.C.
Morristown, Tennessee
September 7, 2012
F-1
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
June 30,
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Assets
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 3,043 | $ | 5,327 | ||||
|
Interest-earning deposits
|
53,650 | 35,221 | ||||||
|
Investment securities classified as available for sale, net
|
83,483 | 74,780 | ||||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
4,735 | 4,735 | ||||||
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
6,861 | 6,625 | ||||||
|
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $5,852 and $8,181
|
322,499 | 378,587 | ||||||
|
Loans held-for-sale
|
381 | — | ||||||
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
26,361 | 26,617 | ||||||
|
Foreclosed real estate, net
|
6,075 | 9,498 | ||||||
|
Accrued interest receivable:
|
||||||||
|
Investments
|
383 | 311 | ||||||
|
Loans receivable
|
1,192 | 1,521 | ||||||
|
Deferred tax asset
|
10,676 | 9,009 | ||||||
|
Core deposit intangible
|
1,537 | 1,978 | ||||||
|
Other assets
|
2,054 | 6,980 | ||||||
|
Total Assets
|
$ | 522,930 | $ | 561,189 | ||||
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
|
Deposits
|
||||||||
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
$ | 52,436 | $ | 54,340 | ||||
|
Interest-bearing
|
371,446 | 399,922 | ||||||
|
Repurchase agreements
|
398 | 945 | ||||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
37,863 | 37,942 | ||||||
|
Subordinated debentures
|
7,245 | 7,133 | ||||||
|
Other liabilities
|
913 | 4,988 | ||||||
|
Accrued income taxes
|
— | — | ||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
470,301 | 505,270 | ||||||
|
Commitments and contingent liabilities
|
— | — | ||||||
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding
|
||||||||
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 9,182,372 shares issued and 6,631,989 and 6,634,523 shares outstanding at June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively
|
92 | 92 | ||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
78,571 | 78,895 | ||||||
|
Unearned ESOP shares
|
(2,809 | ) | (3,241 | ) | ||||
|
Unearned compensation
|
(1,046 | ) | (1,019 | ) | ||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
1,095 | 459 | ||||||
|
Retained earnings
|
8,067 | 12,067 | ||||||
|
Treasury stock, at cost (2,550,383 and 2,547,849 shares)
|
(31,341 | ) | (31,334 | ) | ||||
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
52,629 | 55,919 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 522,930 | $ | 561,189 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-2
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Interest income:
|
||||||||
|
Interest on loans receivable
|
$ | 20,271 | $ | 24,251 | ||||
|
Interest on investment securities
|
1,900 | 1,696 | ||||||
|
Other interest
|
261 | 387 | ||||||
|
Total interest income
|
22,432 | 26,334 | ||||||
|
Interest expense:
|
||||||||
|
Deposits
|
2,965 | 5,601 | ||||||
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
|
6 | 6 | ||||||
|
Advances from FHLB
|
1,272 | 2,105 | ||||||
|
Subordinated debentures
|
327 | 318 | ||||||
|
Total interest expense
|
4,570 | 8,030 | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Net interest income
|
17,862 | 18,304 | ||||||
|
Provision for loan losses
|
9,873 | 4,447 | ||||||
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
7,989 | 13,857 | ||||||
|
Noninterest income:
|
||||||||
|
Mortgage origination income
|
306 | 481 | ||||||
|
Service charges and fees
|
1,106 | 1,288 | ||||||
|
Loss on sale of fixed assets
|
(12 | ) | — | |||||
|
Gain on investment securities, net
|
50 | 2,057 | ||||||
|
Impairment of investment securities
|
(29 | ) | (835 | ) | ||||
|
Loss on sale of foreclosed real estate, net
|
(169 | ) | (681 | ) | ||||
|
BOLI increase in cash value
|
236 | 235 | ||||||
|
Other
|
692 | 688 | ||||||
|
Total noninterest income
|
2,180 | 3,233 | ||||||
|
Noninterest expense:
|
||||||||
|
Compensation and benefits
|
6,209 | 6,687 | ||||||
|
Occupancy expense
|
1,379 | 1,374 | ||||||
|
Equipment and data processing expense
|
2,376 | 2,498 | ||||||
|
DIF deposit insurance premiums
|
811 | 664 | ||||||
|
Advertising
|
359 | 376 | ||||||
|
Professional services
|
442 | 449 | ||||||
|
Valuation adjustment and expenses on other real estate owned
|
2,374 | 1,841 | ||||||
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
441 | 497 | ||||||
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
— | 775 | ||||||
|
Other
|
2,302 | 2,250 | ||||||
|
Total noninterest expense
|
16,693 | 17,411 | ||||||
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
|
(6,524 | ) | (321 | ) | ||||
|
Income taxes:
|
||||||||
|
Current
|
— | (14 | ) | |||||
|
Deferred
|
(2,524 | ) | (337 | ) | ||||
|
Total income taxes
|
(2,524 | ) | (351 | ) | ||||
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
$ | (4,000 | ) | $ | 30 | |||
|
Net earnings (loss) per share, basic
|
$ | (0.64 | ) | $ | — | |||
|
Net earnings (loss) per share, diluted
|
$ | (0.64 | ) | $ | — | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-3
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Unallocated
|
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Additional
|
Common
|
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Common
|
Paid-in
|
Stock in
|
Unearned
|
Comprehensive
|
Retained
|
Treasury
|
Stockholders’
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
ESOP
|
Compensation
|
Income
|
Earnings
|
Stock
|
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at June 30, 2010
|
$ | 92 | $ | 79,175 | $ | (3,673 | ) | $ | (1,053 | ) | $ | 1,206 | $ | 12,023 | $ | (31,247 | ) | $ | 56,523 | |||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net earnings
|
— | — | — | — | — | 30 | — | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Investment securities, available for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unrealized losses during period, net of taxes of ($692)
|
— | — | — | — | (1,115 | ) | — | — | (1,115 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reclassification for realized losses included in net income, net of taxes of $228
|
— | — | — | — | 368 | — | — | 368 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total comprehensive income
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | (717 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends used for ESOP payment
|
— | — | — | — | — | 14 | — | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends used for MRP and ESOP expenses
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares committed to be released by the ESOP
|
— | (280 | ) | 432 | — | — | — | — | 152 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Earned portion of stock grants
|
— | — | — | 34 | — | — | — | 34 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchase of common stock (24,689 shares)
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | (87 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at June 30, 2011
|
92 | 78,895 | (3,241 | ) | (1,019 | ) | 459 | 12,067 | (31,334 | ) | 55,919 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comprehensive income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net loss
|
— | — | — | — | — | (4,000 | ) | — | (4,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Investment securities, available for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gains during period, net of taxes of $501
|
808 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reclassification for realized gains included in net income, net of taxes of ($107)
|
— | — | — | — | (172 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | (4,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dividends used for ESOP payment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares committed to be released by the ESOP
|
— | (324 | ) | 432 | — | — | — | — | 108 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Earned portion of stock grants
|
— | — | — | (27 | ) | — | — | — | (27 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Purchase of common stock (2,534 shares)
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | (7 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at June 30, 2012
|
$ | 92 | $ | 78,571 | $ | (2,809 | ) | $ | (1,046 | ) | $ | 1,095 | $ | 8,067 | $ | (31,341 | ) | $ | 52,629 | |||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Years Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
$ | (4,000 | ) | $ | 30 | |||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:
|
||||||||
|
Allocated ESOP shares
|
109 | 152 | ||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
1,854 | 1,236 | ||||||
|
Amortization of premiums (discounts), net on investment securities
|
572 | 97 | ||||||
|
Provision for loan losses
|
9,873 | 4,447 | ||||||
|
(Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets
|
12 | (1 | ) | |||||
|
(Gain) on sale of investment securities and mortgage-backed securities, net
|
(21 | ) | (395 | ) | ||||
|
Amortization of deferred loan fees, net
|
(169 | ) | (271 | ) | ||||
|
Loss on sale of foreclosed real estate, net
|
169 | 680 | ||||||
|
Deferred tax benefit
|
(2,524 | ) | (338 | ) | ||||
|
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale
|
(13,759 | ) | (18,393 | ) | ||||
|
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans
|
13,378 | 19,546 | ||||||
|
Increase in cash value of life insurance
|
(236 | ) | (235 | ) | ||||
|
Earned portion of MRP
|
(27 | ) | 35 | |||||
|
Decrease (increase) in:
|
||||||||
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
257 | 168 | ||||||
|
Other assets
|
4,925 | (2,562 | ) | |||||
|
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities and accrued income taxes
|
(4,074 | ) | 2,722 | |||||
|
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities
|
6,339 | 6,918 | ||||||
|
Cash flows used for investing activities:
|
||||||||
|
Loan originations, net of principal collections
|
45,910 | 43,588 | ||||||
|
Investment securities classified as available for sale:
|
||||||||
|
Purchased
|
(58,320 | ) | (82,500 | ) | ||||
|
Proceeds from sale
|
3,619 | 12,406 | ||||||
|
Proceeds from maturities, calls and prepayments
|
46,479 | 57,390 | ||||||
|
Purchase of premises and equipment
|
(825 | ) | (201 | ) | ||||
|
Proceeds from the sale of fixed assets
|
14 | 23 | ||||||
|
Proceeds from sale of (additions to) foreclosed real estate, net
|
3,845 | 4,901 | ||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities
|
40,722 | 35,607 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Continued)
(Continued)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
|
(30,337 | ) | (24,871 | ) | ||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in repurchase agreements
|
(547 | ) | 1 | |||||
|
Proceeds from advances from FHLB
|
— | 309 | ||||||
|
Repayment of FHLB advances
|
(25 | ) | (46,632 | ) | ||||
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
(7 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
|
(30,916 | ) | (71,280 | ) | ||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and interest-earning deposits
|
16,145 | (28,755 | ) | |||||
|
Cash, cash equivalents and interest-earning deposits at beginning of period
|
40,548 | 69,303 | ||||||
|
Cash, cash equivalents and interest-earning deposits at end of period
|
$ | 56,693 | $ | 40,548 | ||||
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
|
Cash paid during period for:
|
||||||||
|
Interest on deposits
|
$ | 3,067 | $ | 5,555 | ||||
|
Interest on borrowed funds
|
$ | 1,050 | $ | 2,372 | ||||
|
Interest on subordinated debentures
|
$ | 215 | $ | 206 | ||||
|
Income taxes
|
$ | — | $ | 206 | ||||
|
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans
|
$ | 2,936 | $ | 12,269 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), is the holding company for Jefferson Federal Bank (the “Bank”). The Company’s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol JFBI.
The Company provides a variety of financial services to individuals and small businesses through its offices in Tennessee. Its primary deposit products are transaction accounts and term certificate accounts and its lending products are commercial and residential mortgages and, to a lesser extent, consumer loans.
Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries Jefferson Federal Bank and State of Franklin Bank Statutory Trust II. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates - In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the statement of condition dates and revenues and expenses for the periods shown. Actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used in the consolidated financial statements. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of foreclosed real estate, and deferred tax assets.
Significant Group Concentrations of Credit Risk - The Company originates residential real estate loans, commercial real estate loans and, to a lesser extent, consumer loans primarily to customers located in Upper East Tennessee. The ability of the Company’s debtors to honor their contracts is dependent upon the real estate and general economic conditions in this area.
Significant Accounting Policies - The following comprise the significant accounting policies, which the Company follows in preparing and presenting its consolidated financial statements:
|
a.
|
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and balances due from depository institutions, interest-bearing deposits in other depository institutions and fed funds sold with original maturities of three months or less. Interest-bearing deposits in other depository institutions were $53,650 and $35,221 at June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
|
|
|
b.
|
Investments in debt securities are classified as “held-to-maturity” or “available-for-sale” depending upon the intent of management with respect to the particular investments. Investments classified as “held-to-maturity” are carried at cost while those identified as “available-for-sale” are carried at fair value. All securities are adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts over the term of the security using the interest method. Management has the positive intent and ability to carry those securities classified as “held-to-maturity” to maturity for long-term investment purposes and, accordingly, such securities are not adjusted for temporary declines in market value. “Available-for-sale” securities are adjusted for changes in fair value through a direct entry to a separate component of stockholders’ equity (i.e., other comprehensive income). Investments in equity securities are carried at the lower of cost or market. The cost of securities sold is determined by specific identification.
|
F-7
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
|
c.
|
Loans receivable, net, which management has the intent and ability to hold until maturity or pay-off, are generally carried at unpaid principal balances less loans in process, net deferred loan fees, unearned discount on loans and allowances for losses. Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and amortized to interest income over the contractual life of the loan using the interest method.
|
|
|
|
The accrual of interest on all loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent. All interest accrued but not collected for loans placed on non-accrual or charged off is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash basis or cost-recovery method until the loan is returned to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when future payments are reasonably assured.
|
|
|
|
d.
|
Beginning in January 2005, the Company began originating mortgage loans conforming to guidelines for sale in the secondary mortgage market. Because commitment letters are only given to the borrower after an underwriter agrees to purchase the loan according to the stated terms, the Company’s maximum time between funding the loan and completing the sale to the underwriter is generally three weeks. The loans are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair market value as determined by the amount committed to by the underwriter. The loans are sold without recourse and the mortgage servicing rights are sold as part of the loan package.
|
|
|
e.
|
The allowance for loan and lease losses is an estimate of the losses that are inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The Bank’s charge-off policy is consistent with bank regulatory standards. Generally, loans are charged off when the loan becomes over 120 days delinquent. Real estate acquired as a result of foreclosure is initially recorded at the lower of the amount of the loan or the fair value, less estimated selling costs. Any write-down to fair value is charged to the allowance for loan and lease losses. Any subsequent write-down of foreclosed real estate is charged against earnings.
|
| The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as doubtful, substandard or special mention. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. | ||
| In connection with assessing the allowance, we have established a systematic methodology for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Loans are grouped into pools based on loan type. Loan pools include residential mortgage loans, multi-family loans, construction and land development loans, non-residential real estate loans (owner occupied and non-owner occupied), commercial loans, consumer loans, HELOC and junior liens. Commercial business loans and loans secured by commercial real estate are generally larger and involve a greater degree of risk than residential mortgage loans. In addition, loans secured by commercial real estate are more likely to be negatively impacted by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. Management utilizes a loan grading system and assigns a loan grade of “Pass”, “Watch”, “Special |
F-8
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Mention”, “Substandard”, “Doubtful” or “Loss” based on risk characteristics of loans. Lending staff reviews the loan grades of customers on a regular basis and makes changes as needed given that the creditworthiness of customers may change over time.
Descriptions of loan grades are as follows:
Pass - loans in this category represent an acceptable risk and do not require heightened levels of monitoring by lending staff.
Watch - loans in this category represent an acceptable risk; however, require monitoring by lending staff due to potential weakness for any number of reasons.
Special Mention - loans in this category have potential weaknesses that may result in deteriorating prospects for the asset or in the Bank’s credit position at some future date.
Substandard - loans in this category are inadequately protected by the sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower or the collateral pledged. Borrowers in this category have a well-defined weakness(es) that jeopardize the proper liquidation of the debt.
Doubtful - loans classified as doubtful have a clear and defined weakness making the ultimate repayment of the loan, or portions thereof, highly improbable.
Loss - loans classified as “loss” are those of such little value that their continuance as bank assets is not warranted, even though partial recovery may be affected in the future. Charge off is required in the month this grade is assigned.
Specific valuation allowances are established for impaired loans. The Company considers a loan to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement on a timely basis. A specific reserve represents the difference between the recorded value of the loan and either its estimated fair value less estimated disposition costs, or the net present value as determined by a discounted cash flow analysis. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates individual loans which have an outstanding principal balance of $250,000 or more and which are classified as either substandard, doubtful or loss according to the loan grading policy for impairment. Troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) are also considered to be impaired, except for those that have been performing under the new terms for at least six consecutive months.
A TDR occurs when the Bank grants a concession to a borrower with financial difficulties that it would not otherwise consider. The Bank has adopted the guidance and definitions found in ASU 2011-02 in determining if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and if a concession has been granted. The majority of the Bank’s TDRs involve a modification involving changes in amortization terms, reductions in interest rates, interest only payments and, in limited cases, concessions to outstanding loan balances. A TDR may be non-accruing or it may accrue interest. A nonaccrual TDR will be returned to accruing status at such time when the borrower successfully performs under the new terms for at least six consecutive months. The Bank’s TDRs totaled $10.8 million and $15.8 million at June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
F-9
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
| The accrual of interest on all loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent. All interest accrued but not collected for loans placed on non-accrual or charged off is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash basis or cost-recovery method until the loan is returned to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when future payments are reasonably assured. Payments received on non-accrual loans are applied to the remaining principal balance of the loans. | ||
| The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. The evaluation of the allowance for loan and lease losses is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. The Company is subject to periodic examination by regulatory agencies, which may require the Company to record increases in the allowances based on the regulator’s evaluation of available information. There can be no assurance that the Company’s regulators will not require further increases to the allowances. | ||
|
Tabular information related to loan grades, composition of loan portfolio and activity in the allowance for loan losses is included in Note 6.
|
||
|
f.
|
Credit related financial instruments arising in the ordinary course of business consist primarily of commitments to extend credit. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.
|
|
|
g.
|
Premises and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for assets with a life greater than one year and costing more than $1,000 are generally capitalized. Depreciation of premises and equipment is computed using the straight-line and accelerated methods based on the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Estimated lives for buildings, leasehold improvements, equipment and furniture are thirty-nine, thirty- nine, five and seven years, respectively. Estimated lives for building improvements are evaluated on a case-by-case basis and depreciated over the estimated remaining life of the improvement.
|
|
|
|
h. | Foreclosed real estate is initially recorded, and subsequently carried, at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. Costs related to improvement of foreclosed real estate are capitalized. |
|
i.
|
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.
|
|
|
j.
|
GAAP requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award - the requisite service period.
|
|
| The Company has expensed all outstanding options in prior years. |
F-10
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Core Deposit Intangible – The core deposit intangible (CDI) is an asset arising from the acquisition of State of Franklin Bank. The CDI was initially measured at fair value and then amortized using an accelerated method over 10 years. The core deposit intangible asset is assessed at least annually for impairment and any such impairment will be recognized in the period identified.
Segment Reporting – The Company’s operations are solely in the financial services industry and include providing to its customers traditional banking and other financial services. The Company operates primarily in Tennessee. Management makes operating decisions and assesses performance based on an ongoing review of the Company’s financial results. Therefore, the Company has a single operating segment for financial reporting purposes.
NOTE 2 – RESTRICTIONS ON CASH AND AMOUNTS DUE FROM BANKS
The Bank is required to maintain average balances on hand or with the Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank. At June 30, 2012 and 2011, these reserve balances amounted to $4,408 and $4,133, respectively.
NOTE 3 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings per common share and earnings per common share-assuming dilution have been computed on the basis of dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share reflect additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options and are determined using the treasury stock method. Calculations related to earnings per share are provided in the following table.
|
Year Ended
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||
|
June 30, 2012
|
June 30, 2011
|
|||||||
|
Weighted average number of common shares used in computing basic earnings per common share
|
6,243,347 | 6,216,249 | ||||||
|
Effect of dilutive stock options
|
— | — | ||||||
|
Weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares used in computing earnings per common share assuming dilution
|
6,243,347 | 6,216,249 | ||||||
F-11
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 4 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
ASU 2011-02 – In April 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination for Determining Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. This Update applies to both public and non-public companies. Clarification is provided regarding the guidance as to whether a creditor has granted a concession that constitutes a troubled debt restructuring and the creditor’s evaluation of whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties, especially when there is no default on payments. For public entities, the Update is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 30, 2011 and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. Effective date for non-public entities is for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for both public and non-public entities.
In the third quarter of 2010, the SEC amended its rules and forms to reflect the provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that permanently exempts non-accelerated filers from the requirement of Section 404 (b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to include in annual reports filed with the SEC the auditor’s attestation report on management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting. This rule was effective September 21, 2010, and the Company’s 2012 annual reporting is subject to the exemption.
ASU 2011-04 – In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The objective of this update is to provide guidance to ensure that fair value has the same meaning in U.S Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and International Financial Reporting Standards and their respective fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are the same. This Update explains how to measure fair value and does not require additional fair value measurements. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and early application by public entities is not permitted. The ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
ASU 2011-05 – In June 2011, The FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The objective of this Update is to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. To increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income and to facilitate convergence of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), the FASB decided to eliminate the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity, among other amendments in this Update.
The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, because compliance with the amendments is already permitted. The amendments do not require any transition disclosures. The ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
ASU 2011-12 – In December 2011, the FASB issue. Accounting Standards Update 2011-12, Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. The objective of this Update is to defer the effective date of the provision in ASU 2011-05 related to the reclassification of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments are being made to allow the Board time to re-deliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. The effective date of these amendments is the same as the effective date of ASU 2011-05 above. All other requirements of ASU 2011-05 are not affected by this Update. The ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
F-12
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 5 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investment securities are summarized as follows:
|
June 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Securities Available-for-Sale
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Debt securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Federal agency securities
|
$ | 24,033 | $ | 263 | $ | — | $ | 24,296 | ||||||||
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
52,822 | 1,658 | (65 | ) | 54,415 | |||||||||||
|
Municipal securities
|
4,245 | 318 | 4,563 | |||||||||||||
|
Other securities
|
609 | — | (400 | ) | 209 | |||||||||||
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
$ | 81,709 | $ | 2,239 | $ | (465 | ) | $ | 83,483 | |||||||
|
Weighted-average rate
|
2.20 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
June 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Securities Available-for-Sale
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Debt securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Federal agency securities
|
$ | 43,721 | $ | 228 | $ | — | $ | 43,949 | ||||||||
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
24,551 | 861 | (56 | ) | 25,356 | |||||||||||
|
Municipal securities
|
5,150 | 112 | (25 | ) | 5,237 | |||||||||||
|
Other securities
|
613 | — | (375 | ) | 238 | |||||||||||
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
$ | 74,035 | $ | 1,201 | $ | (456 | ) | $ | 74,780 | |||||||
|
Weighted-average rate
|
2.35 | % | ||||||||||||||
Investment securities with a carrying value of $13,021 and $19,389 were pledged to secure public funds, repurchase agreements and/or advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank at June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
At June 30, 2012, the Company held no securities of any single issue (excluding the U.S. Government and federal agencies) with a book value that exceeded 10% of stockholders’ equity.
F-13
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 5 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES (CONTINUED)
Securities with unrealized losses not recognized in income are as follows:
|
Less than 12 months
|
12 months or more
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Value
|
Losses
|
Value
|
Losses
|
Value
|
Losses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
June 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal agency securities
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
2,100 | (9 | ) | 569 | (56 | ) | 2,669 | (65 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
Municipal securities
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other securities
|
— | — | 207 | (400 | ) | 207 | (400 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | 2,100 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 776 | $ | (456 | ) | $ | 2,876 | $ | (465 | ) | ||||||||||
|
June 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal agency securities
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
1,412 | (15 | ) | 727 | (41 | ) | 2,139 | (56 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
Municipal securities
|
1,457 | (25 | ) | — | — | 1,457 | (25 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Other securities
|
— | — | 233 | (375 | ) | 233 | (375 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | 2,869 | $ | (40 | ) | $ | 960 | $ | (416 | ) | $ | 3,829 | $ | (456 | ) | ||||||||||
The Company evaluates its securities with significant declines in fair value on a quarterly basis to determine whether they should be considered temporarily or other than temporarily impaired. The Company has recognized all of the foregoing unrealized losses in other comprehensive income. Other-than-temporary impairment charges for the year ending June 30, 2012 totaled $29. The charge off is due to a calculated credit loss. Unrealized losses on all securities as shown above are considered to be temporary in nature.
GSE Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities – The unrealized losses of $9 for these four GSE mortgage-backed securities were caused by changes in market interest rates. The contractual cash flows of these investments are guaranteed by an agency of the U.S. Government. Accordingly it is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized bases of the Company’s investments. Because the decline in market value is attributable to changes in market interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases and it is not more likely than not the Company does not intend to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2012.
Private-Label Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities - The unrealized loss of $56 for this private-label mortgage-backed security is primarily driven by higher projected collateral losses, wider credit spreads and changes in interest rates as indicated by the annual independent valuation of the investment. The valuation methodology used is a future cash flow analysis which is built upon a model based on collateral-specific assumptions as they relate to the underlying loans. Given the expected improvement in the future performances of the expected cash flow, the unrealized losses are not deemed to be attributable to credit quality. Accordingly it is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized bases of the Company’s investments. Because the decline in market value is attributable to higher projected collateral losses, wider credit spreads and changes in interest rates and not credit quality, the Company expects to recover the entire amortized cost bases of this security.
F-14
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 5 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES (CONTINUED)
Other Securities – The unrealized loss of $400 on this CDO was a result of updated variables and inputs that comprise the model used in the annual independent valuation of this security. The collateral for the CDO investment is comprised of trust preferred securities and senior and subordinated debt issued by banks, insurance companies, REIT’s, real estate operating companies and homebuilding companies. The CDO security is valued by evaluating all relevant credit and structural aspects of the instrument, determining appropriate performance assumptions and performing a discounted cash flow analysis. Given the expected improvement in the future performance of the collateral, the unrealized loss is not deemed to be attributable to credit quality. Since the Company does not intend to sell this investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider this investment to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2012.
Maturities of debt securities at June 30, 2012 are summarized as follows:
|
Weighted
|
||||||||||||
|
Fair
|
Average
|
|||||||||||
|
Cost
|
Value
|
Yield
|
||||||||||
|
Within 1 year
|
$ | 283 | $ | 287 | 2.68 | % | ||||||
|
Over 1 year through 5 years
|
12,615 | 12,788 | 1.49 | % | ||||||||
|
After 5 years through 10 years
|
13,480 | 13,789 | 1.69 | % | ||||||||
|
Over 10 years
|
55,331 | 56,619 | 2.48 | % | ||||||||
| $ | 81,709 | $ | 83,483 | 2.20 | % | |||||||
Proceeds from sale of debt securities and gross realized gains and losses on these sales are summarized as follows:
|
Years Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Proceeds from sales
|
$ | 3,619 | $ | 13,110 | ||||
|
Gross realized gains
|
$ | 156 | $ | 1,269 | ||||
|
Gross realized losses
|
(135 | ) | (40 | ) | ||||
|
Net gains (losses) from sales
|
$ | 21 | $ | 1,229 | ||||
F-15
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 6 – LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET
Loans receivable, net are summarized as follows:
|
June 30,
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Real estate loans:
|
||||||||
|
Residential one-to four-family
|
$ | 97,182 | $ | 110,046 | ||||
|
Multi-family
|
11,564 | 14,062 | ||||||
|
Construction
|
548 | 2,171 | ||||||
|
Commercial
|
127,185 | 144,519 | ||||||
|
Land
|
27,487 | 30,053 | ||||||
|
Home equity line of credit
|
18,395 | 20,029 | ||||||
|
Total real estate loans
|
282,361 | 320,880 | ||||||
|
Commercial business loans
|
42,107 | 60,497 | ||||||
|
Consumer Loans:
|
||||||||
|
Loans secured by deposit accounts
|
381 | 1,268 | ||||||
|
Other consumer loans
|
2,989 | 3,235 | ||||||
|
Loans secured by automobiles
|
833 | 1,237 | ||||||
|
Mobile home loans
|
3 | 13 | ||||||
|
Total non-real estate loans
|
4,206 | 5,753 | ||||||
|
Total gross loans
|
328,674 | 387,130 | ||||||
|
Less:
|
||||||||
|
Deferred loan fees, net
|
(323 | ) | (362 | ) | ||||
|
Allowance for losses
|
(5,852 | ) | (8,181 | ) | ||||
|
Loans receivable, net
|
$ | 322,499 | $ | 378,587 | ||||
|
Weighted average rate
|
5.82 | % | 6.00 | % | ||||
The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired and non-accrual loans:
|
June 30,
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance
|
$ | 12,359 | $ | 10,659 | ||||
|
Impaired loans with a valution allowance
|
12,051 | 20,544 | ||||||
|
Total impaired loans
|
$ | 24,410 | $ | 31,203 | ||||
|
Valuation allowance for impaired loans
|
$ | 2,861 | $ | 5,688 | ||||
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
$ | 18,562 | $ | 8,248 | ||||
|
Average investment in impaired loans
|
$ | 30,415 | $ | 33,955 | ||||
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans
|
$ | 825 | $ | 1,068 | ||||
F-16
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 6 – LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET (CONTINUED)
No additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans.
Commercial real estate loans are secured principally by office buildings, shopping centers, churches and other rental real estate. Construction loans are secured by commercial real estate and single-family dwellings.
The following is a table summarizing the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the year ending June 30, 2012:
|
Resid. Mtg.
|
Multi-Family
|
Constr. & Land Dev.
|
Non-resid real estate
|
Owner Occupied
|
Comm’l
|
HELOC / Junior Liens
|
Cons-umer
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Allowance for Credit Losses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at June 30, 2011
|
$ | 1,543 | $ | 1,858 | $ | 803 | $ | 1,934 | $ | 803 | $ | 1,197 | $ | — | $ | 43 | $ | 8,181 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Charge Offs
|
(366 | ) | (2,491 | ) | (146 | ) | (1,106 | ) | (224 | ) | (8,673 | ) | (30 | ) | (100 | ) | (13,136 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Recoveries
|
8 | — | 4 | — | — | 897 | — | 25 | 934 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Provision
|
(486 | ) | 1,229 | 116 | 219 | (232 | ) | 8,709 | 264 | 54 | 9,873 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at June 30, 2012
|
$ | 699 | $ | 596 | $ | 777 | $ | 1,047 | $ | 347 | $ | 2,130 | $ | 234 | $ | 22 | $ | 5,852 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ending balance, Individually Evaluated
|
$ | 280 | $ | 91 | $ | 547 | $ | 703 | $ | 69 | $ | 1,046 | $ | 125 | $ | — | $ | 2,861 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Ending balance, Collectively Evaluated
|
$ | 419 | $ | 505 | $ | 230 | $ | 344 | $ | 278 | $ | 1,084 | $ | 109 | $ | 22 | $ | 2,991 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at June 30, 2012
|
$ | 98,596 | $ | 11,564 | $ | 28,635 | $ | 50,854 | $ | 73,251 | $ | 42,115 | $ | 19,462 | $ | 4,197 | $ | 328,674 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Ending balance, Individually Evaluated
|
$ | 1,659 | $ | 629 | $ | 1,191 | $ | 4,632 | $ | 715 | $ | 3,053 | $ | 172 | $ | — | $ | 12,051 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Ending balance, Collectively Evaluated
|
$ | 96,937 | $ | 10,935 | $ | 27,444 | $ | 46,222 | $ | 72,536 | $ | 39,062 | $ | 19,290 | $ | 4,197 | $ | 316,623 | ||||||||||||||||||
The following table is an aging analysis of the loan portfolio:
|
30-59 days past due
|
60-89 days past due
|
90 or more days past due and still accruing
|
Non-accrual
|
Total past due
|
Total Current
|
Total loans receivable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residential Mortgage
|
$ | 464 | $ | 173 | $ | — | $ | 5,148 | $ | 5,785 | $ | 92,811 | $ | 98,596 | ||||||||||||||
|
Multi-family
|
98 | — | — | 5,232 | 5,330 | 6,234 | 11,564 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Construction/land development
|
378 | 23 | — | 2,014 | 2,415 | 26,220 | 28,635 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-residential real estate
|
— | 176 | — | 3,208 | 3,384 | 47,470 | 50,854 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Owner occupied
|
330 | — | — | 1,468 | 1,798 | 71,453 | 73,251 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Commercial
|
133 | — | — | 1,348 | 1,481 | 40,634 | 42,115 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
HELOC and Jr. Lien
|
111 | — | — | 110 | 221 | 19,241 | 19,462 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consumer
|
17 | — | — | 34 | 51 | 4,146 | 4,197 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 1,531 | $ | 372 | $ | — | $ | 18,562 | $ | 20,465 | $ | 308,209 | $ | 328,674 | ||||||||||||||
F-17
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 6 – LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET (CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes the credit risk profile by internally assigned grade:
|
Resid. Mtg.
|
Multi-family
|
Const and land dev.
|
Non-residential real estate
|
Owner occupied
|
Comm’l
|
HELOC / Junior Liens
|
Consumer
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Grade:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pass
|
$ | 87,340 | $ | 5,605 | $ | 23,915 | $ | 29,076 | $ | 64,831 | $ | 37,164 | $ | 17,656 | $ | 3,741 | $ | 269,328 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Watch
|
2,937 | — | 2,040 | 15,559 | 6,413 | 1,397 | 572 | 420 | 29,338 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Special mention
|
— | — | — | 1,122 | — | — | — | — | 1,122 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Substandard
|
8,319 | 5,959 | 2,680 | 5,097 | 2,007 | 3,554 | 1,234 | 36 | 28,886 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Doubtful
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Loss
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total:
|
$ | 98,596 | $ | 11,564 | $ | 28,635 | $ | 50,854 | $ | 73,251 | $ | 42,115 | $ | 19,462 | $ | 4,197 | $ | 328,674 | ||||||||||||||||||
The following table summarizes the composition of impaired loans, the associated specific reserves and interest income recognized on impaired loans:
|
Recorded investment
|
Unpaid principal balance
|
Specific allowance
|
Interest income recognized
|
|||||||||||||
|
With an allowance recorded:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Residential Mortgage
|
$ | 1,379 | $ | 1,659 | $ | (280 | ) | $ | 49 | |||||||
|
Multi-family
|
538 | 629 | (91 | ) | 48 | |||||||||||
|
Construction and land development
|
644 | 1,191 | (547 | ) | 54 | |||||||||||
|
Non-residential real estate
|
3,929 | 4,632 | (703 | ) | 60 | |||||||||||
|
Owner occupied
|
646 | 715 | (69 | ) | — | |||||||||||
|
Commercial
|
2,007 | 3,053 | (1,046 | ) | 161 | |||||||||||
|
Heloc and junior lien
|
47 | 172 | (125 | ) | 7 | |||||||||||
|
Consumer
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 9,190 | $ | 12,051 | $ | (2,861 | ) | $ | 379 | |||||||
|
With no related allowance:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Residential Mortgage
|
$ | 1,583 | $ | 1,583 | $ | — | $ | 88 | ||||||||
|
Multi-family
|
5,258 | 5,258 | — | 98 | ||||||||||||
|
Construction and land development
|
1,233 | 1,233 | — | 44 | ||||||||||||
|
Non-residential real estate
|
2,926 | 2,926 | — | 182 | ||||||||||||
|
Owner occupied
|
601 | 601 | — | 10 | ||||||||||||
|
Commercial
|
85 | 85 | — | 2 | ||||||||||||
|
Heloc and junior lien
|
673 | 673 | 22 | |||||||||||||
|
Consumer
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 12,359 | $ | 12,359 | $ | — | $ | 446 | ||||||||
|
Total:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Residential Mortgage
|
$ | 2,962 | $ | 3,242 | $ | (280 | ) | $ | 137 | |||||||
|
Multi-family
|
5,796 | 5,887 | (91 | ) | 146 | |||||||||||
|
Construction and land development
|
1,877 | 2,424 | (547 | ) | 98 | |||||||||||
|
Non-residential real estate
|
6,855 | 7,558 | (703 | ) | 242 | |||||||||||
|
Owner occupied
|
1,247 | 1,316 | (69 | ) | 10 | |||||||||||
|
Commercial
|
2,092 | 3,138 | (1,046 | ) | 163 | |||||||||||
|
Heloc and junior lien
|
720 | 845 | (125 | ) | 29 | |||||||||||
|
Consumer
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 21,549 | $ | 24,410 | $ | (2,861 | ) | $ | 825 | |||||||
F-18
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 6 – LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET (CONTINUED)
The following table presents the Bank’s loans classified as TDRs by loan type and accrual status as of June 30, 2012:
|
June 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Accrual
|
Non-accrual
|
Number
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
|
Status
|
Status
|
of Loans
|
TDRs
|
|||||||||||||
|
Residential Mortgage
|
$ | 899 | $ | 519 | 6 | $ | 1,418 | |||||||||
|
Multi-family
|
629 | 5,232 | 2 | 5,861 | ||||||||||||
|
Construction and land development
|
152 | 32 | 2 | 184 | ||||||||||||
|
Non-residential real estate
|
— | 1,967 | 1 | 1,967 | ||||||||||||
|
Owner occupied
|
330 | 390 | 3 | 720 | ||||||||||||
|
Commercial
|
122 | 315 | 3 | 437 | ||||||||||||
|
HELOC and Junior Lien
|
172 | — | 1 | 172 | ||||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,304 | $ | 8,455 | 18 | $ | 10,759 | |||||||||
The following table presents newly restructured loans with concessions related to loan balances that occurred during the year ended June 30, 2012:
|
Year Ended June 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||
|
Pre-Modification
|
Post-Modification
|
|||||||||||
|
Outstanding
|
Outstanding
|
|||||||||||
|
Number of
|
Recorded
|
Recorded
|
||||||||||
|
Loans
|
Investment
|
Investment
|
||||||||||
|
Multi-family
|
2 | $ | 7,775 | $ | 5,284 | |||||||
|
Non-residential real estate
|
1 | 3,025 | 2,000 | |||||||||
|
Total
|
3 | $ | 10,800 | $ | 7,284 | |||||||
Following is a summary of loans to directors, executive officers and associates of such persons:
|
Balance at June 30, 2011
|
$ | 745 | ||
|
Additions
|
110 | |||
|
Reclassifications
|
(10 | ) | ||
|
Repayments
|
(6 | ) | ||
|
Balance at June 30, 2012
|
$ | 839 |
These loans were made on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons.
F-19
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 7 – PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Premises and equipment, net are summarized as follows:
|
June 30,
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Land
|
$ | 6,772 | $ | 6,239 | ||||
|
Office building
|
21,982 | 21,862 | ||||||
|
Furniture and equipment
|
5,704 | 5,625 | ||||||
| 34,458 | 33,726 | |||||||
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
8,097 | 7,109 | ||||||
| $ | 26,361 | $ | 26,617 | |||||
Depreciation expense for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $1,055 and $1,117, respectively.
Pursuant to the terms of non-cancelable lease agreements in effect at June 30, 2012, pertaining to real property, future minimum payments are as follows:
|
For the Year Ended
|
||||
|
2013
|
$ | 19 | ||
|
2014
|
9 | |||
| $ | 28 | |||
Lease expense for June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $49 and $59, respectively.
The Company has also entered into a service contract for data processing services. Future minimum payments under this agreement are as follows:
|
For the Year Ended
|
||||
|
2013
|
$ | 1,062 | ||
|
2014
|
1,058 | |||
|
2015
|
652 | |||
|
2016
|
12 | |||
| $ | 2,784 | |||
Data processing service expense for June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $1,075 and $1,113, respectively.
F-20
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 8 - DEPOSITS
Deposits are summarized as follows:
|
June 30,
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Non-interest bearing accounts
|
$ | 52,436 | $ | 54,340 | ||||
|
NOW accounts, 0.12% and 0.26%, respectively
|
52,958 | 46,134 | ||||||
|
Savings accounts, 0.23% and 0.67%, respectively
|
96,588 | 91,637 | ||||||
|
Money market accounts, 0.23% and 0.79%, respectively
|
51,492 | 51,252 | ||||||
|
Total transaction accounts
|
$ | 253,474 | $ | 243,363 | ||||
|
Certificates:
|
||||||||
|
0.00 - 1.00%
|
$ | 129,619 | $ | 82,706 | ||||
|
1.01 - 2.00%
|
36,538 | 108,257 | ||||||
|
2.01 - 3.00%
|
2,313 | 8,046 | ||||||
|
3.01 - 4.00%
|
64 | 4,963 | ||||||
|
4.01 - 5.00%
|
1,874 | 6,927 | ||||||
|
Total Certificates, 0.91% and 1.46%, respectively
|
170,408 | 210,899 | ||||||
|
Total Deposits
|
$ | 423,882 | $ | 454,262 | ||||
|
Weighted-average rate - deposits
|
0.46 | % | 0.92 | % | ||||
The aggregate amount of time deposits in denominations of $100 or more was $67,502 and $89,659, respectively, at June 30, 2012 and 2011.
The Deposit Insurance Fund, as administrated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, insures deposits up to applicable limits. Deposit amounts in excess of $250,000 are generally not federally insured.
The total amount of overdrafts reclassified as loans was $75 and $200, respectively, at June 30, 2012 and 2011.
At June 30, 2012, the scheduled maturities of time deposits are as follows:
|
2013
|
$ | 125,031 | ||
|
2014
|
28,338 | |||
|
2015
|
14,316 | |||
|
2016
|
999 | |||
|
2017
|
1,724 | |||
|
Total
|
$ | 170,408 |
F-21
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 8 – DEPOSITS (CONTINUED)
Following is a summary of interest on deposits:
|
June 30,
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
NOW
|
$ | 77 | $ | 145 | ||||
|
Savings
|
485 | 651 | ||||||
|
MMA
|
311 | 521 | ||||||
|
Certificates
|
2,092 | 4,284 | ||||||
| 2,965 | 5,601 | |||||||
|
Less: penalties
|
— | — | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 2,965 | $ | 5,601 | ||||
NOTE 9 - FHLB ADVANCES
At June 30, 2012, the Company’s fixed-rate FHLB advances had interest rates that ranged from 1.66% to 3.93% with a weighted average rate of 2.77% and 2.77% at June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Pursuant to collateral agreements with the FHLB, advances are secured by a Blanket Mortgage Collateral Agreement. The Agreement pledges the entire one-to-four family residential mortgage portfolio and allows a maximum advance of $52,687 and an additional borrowing capacity of $15,032 at June 30, 2012. Outstanding advances were $37,863 and $37,942 at June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Advances are payable at the maturity dates and prepayment penalties are required if paid before maturity.
A total of $10.0 million of FHLB advances are putable advances that give the FHLB the option to require repayment on specific dates. Under the terms of the putable advances, the company could be required to repay all of the principal and accrued interest before the maturity date.
A total of $10.0 million of FHLB advances are convertible advances with interest rates that may be reset on certain dates at the option of the FHLB in accordance with the terms of the note. The Company has the option of repaying the outstanding advance or converting the interest rate from a fixed rate to a floating LIBOR rate at the time the advance is called by the FHLB.
F-22
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 9 - FHLB ADVANCES (CONTINUED)
Maturities and weighted average rates of fixed rate FHLB advances at June 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
|
Amount
|
Weighted Avg Rate
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fixed Rate Advances Maturing:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Less than 1 year
|
$ | — | $ | — | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||
|
1 to 2 years
|
26,993 | — | 2.34 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||
|
2 to 3 years
|
5,082 | 26,989 | 3.93 | % | 2.34 | % | ||||||||||
|
3 to 4 years
|
— | 5,115 | 0.00 | % | 3.93 | % | ||||||||||
|
4 to 5 years
|
— | — | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||
|
5 to 10 years
|
5,134 | 5,159 | 3.90 | % | 3.90 | % | ||||||||||
|
After 10 years
|
654 | 679 | 2.66 | % | 2.66 | % | ||||||||||
|
Total FHLB Advances
|
$ | 37,863 | $ | 37,942 | 2.77 | % | 2.77 | % | ||||||||
|
NOTE 10 – INCOME TAXES
|
In computing federal income tax, savings institutions treated as small banks for tax years beginning before 1996 were allowed a statutory bad debt deduction based on specified experience formulas or 8% of otherwise taxable income, subject to limitations based on aggregate loans and savings balances. For tax years after 1996, financial institutions meeting the definition of a small bank can use either the “experience method” or the “specific charge-off method” in computing their bad debt deduction. The Company qualifies as a small bank and is using the experience method. As of June 30, 2012, the end of the most recent tax year, the Company’s tax bad debt reserves were approximately $1,312. If these tax bad debt reserves are used for other than loan losses, the amount used will be subject to federal income taxes at the then prevailing corporate rates.
|
Income taxes are summarized as follows:
|
|
Years Ending June 30,
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Current taxes:
|
||||||||
|
Federal income
|
$ | — | $ | (14 | ) | |||
|
State excise
|
— | — | ||||||
| — | (14 | ) | ||||||
|
Deferred taxes
|
||||||||
|
Federal income
|
(2,229 | ) | (299 | ) | ||||
|
State excise
|
(295 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||
| (2,524 | ) | (337 | ) | |||||
| $ | (2,524 | ) | $ | (351 | ) | |||
F-23
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
NOTE 10 – INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
|
|
The provision for income taxes differs from the federal statutory corporate rate as follows:
|
|
Percentage of Earnings
|
||||||||
|
Before Income Taxes
|
||||||||
|
Years Ending June 30,
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Tax at statutory rate
|
(34.0 | %) | (34.0 | %) | ||||
|
Increase (decrease) in taxes:
|
||||||||
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
|
(4.3 | ) | — | |||||
|
Increase in BOLI cash value
|
(1.4 | ) | (24.9 | ) | ||||
|
Additional ESOP compensation
|
(2.0 | ) | (46.0 | ) | ||||
|
Other, net
|
3.0 | (4.6 | ) | |||||
| — | ||||||||
|
Effective tax rate
|
(38.7 | %) | (109.5 | %) | ||||
The provisions of GAAP related to income taxes require the Company to establish a deferred tax liability for the tax effect of the tax bad debt reserves over the base year amounts. There were no excess reserves at June 30, 2012 and 2011. The Company’s base year tax bad debt reserve is $1,312. The estimated deferred tax liability on the base year amount is approximately $502, which has not been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The deferred tax valuation allowance is related to a capital loss carryforward that can only be used to offset capital gains.
The Company acquired a tax net operating loss (NOL) carryforward from its acquisition of State of Franklin. A deferred tax benefit was recorded for the portion deemed usable over its statutory remaining life (initially 20 years). The expiration date of the remaining NOL carryforward of $10,560 is June 30, 2029.
A deferred tax benefit of $14 was recorded for the remaining 2010 NOL of $36. This NOL’s remaining life is eighteen years and management believes it will be utilized in full prior to expiration. A deferred tax benefit of $2,305 has been recorded for the prior year NOL of $6,021. The NOL’s remaining life is nineteen years and management believes it will be utilized in full prior to expiration.
For the current year, a deferred tax benefit of $3,018 has been recorded for the NOL of $7,883. The NOL’s remaining life is twenty years and management believes it will be utilized in full prior to expiration.
F-24
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
NOTE 10 – INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
|
The components of the net deferred tax asset are summarized as follows:
|
June 30,
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
FHLB stock dividends
|
$ | (959 | ) | $ | (960 | ) | ||
|
Depreciation
|
(27 | ) | (94 | ) | ||||
|
FHLB advance restructuring penalty
|
(181 | ) | (289 | ) | ||||
|
Allowance for “available-for-sale” securities
|
(679 | ) | (285 | ) | ||||
| (1,846 | ) | (1,628 | ) | |||||
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
||||||||
|
Fair value adjustment from acquisition,net
|
533 | 672 | ||||||
|
Subsequent writedowns on foreclosed property
|
831 | 168 | ||||||
|
Nonaccrual interest on securities
|
48 | 55 | ||||||
|
NOL carryforward
|
8,023 | 5,848 | ||||||
|
Deferred loan fees, net
|
124 | 138 | ||||||
|
MRP compensation
|
— | 21 | ||||||
|
Stock options
|
— | 169 | ||||||
|
Deferred compensation
|
55 | 50 | ||||||
|
Allowance for losses on loans
|
2,908 | 3,472 | ||||||
|
Capital loss on Silverton Bank Stock
|
141 | 141 | ||||||
|
Charge-offs not recognized for tax purposes
|
— | 44 | ||||||
|
Gross deferred tax asets
|
12,663 | 10,778 | ||||||
|
Valuation allowance
|
(141 | ) | (141 | ) | ||||
|
Deferred tax asset
|
12,522 | 10,637 | ||||||
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
$ | 10,676 | $ | 9,009 | ||||
NOTE 11 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
401 (K) RETIREMENT PLAN. The Company has a defined contribution pension plan covering all employees having attained the age of 20 and one-half and completing six months of service. Normal retirement date is the participant’s sixty-fifth birthday.
Before the Company established the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (effective July 1, 2003), the 401(k) plan was funded by annual employer contributions of 10% of the total plan compensation of all participants in the plan. The amount contributed by the employer was divided among the participants in the same proportion that each participant’s compensation bore to the aggregate compensation of all participants. Employer contributions vest to employees over a seven-year period. Employees are permitted to make contributions of up to 50% of their compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws.
F-25
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 11 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN. The Bank maintains an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). On July 1, 2003, the ESOP purchased 670,089 shares of Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. from proceeds provided by the Company in the form of a loan. Thus, the ESOP is considered a leveraged plan. Employees are eligible for participation in the plan upon attaining 20 and one-half years of age and completing six consecutive calendar months during which they have performed at least 500 hours of service. Each plan year, the Bank may, in its discretion, make a contribution to the plan; however, at a minimum, the Bank has agreed to make as a contribution the amount necessary to service the debt incurred to acquire the stock.
Shares are scheduled for release as the loan is repaid. The present amortization schedule calls for 43,206.63 shares to be released each December 31. Dividends on unallocated shares are used to repay the loan while dividends paid on allocated shares become part of the plan’s assets. Accounting for the ESOP consists of recognizing compensation expense for the fair market value of the shares as of the date of release. Allocated shares are included in earnings per share calculations while unallocated shares are not included.
ESOP compensation expense was $109 and $152 for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The original number of shares committed was 670,089 and 43,207 were released during the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The 302,446 remaining unearned shares had an approximate fair market value of $744 at June 30, 2012.
The Bank has also established a SERP to provide for supplemental retirement benefits with respect to the ESOP. The plan provides certain executives with benefits that cannot be provided under the ESOP as a result of the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code, but that would have been provided under the ESOP but for such limitations. The Plan was amended in 2007 to change the first allocation period to December 31, 2007. Compensation expense under the SERP was $(2) and $0 for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS. The Company maintains stock-based benefit plans under which certain employees and directors are eligible to receive restricted stock grants or options. Under the 2005 Stock-Based Benefit Plan, the maximum number of shares that may be granted as restricted stock is 279,500, and a maximum of 698,750 shares may be issued through the exercise of non-statutory or incentive stock options. The exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant and an option’s maximum term is ten years.
Restricted stock grants aggregating 45,000 shares and having a fair value of $597 were awarded in 2006. Restrictions on the grants lapse in annual increments over five years. The market value as of the grant date of the restricted stock grants is charged to expense as the restrictions lapse. Compensation expense for grants vesting in 2012 and 2011 was $(27) and $35, respectively.
F-26
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 11 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plan is presented below:
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Weighted-
|
Weighted-
|
|||||||||||||||
|
average
|
average
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
exercise price
|
Shares
|
exercise price
|
|||||||||||||
|
Outstanding at beginning of period
|
525,287 | $ | 12.69 | 551,490 | $ | 12.74 | ||||||||||
|
Granted during the twelve-month period
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Options exercised
|
— | — | ||||||||||||||
|
Options forfeited
|
(184,649 | ) | 10.85 | (26,203 | ) | 13.69 | ||||||||||
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
340,638 | $ | 13.69 | 525,287 | $ | 12.69 | ||||||||||
|
Options exercisable at end of year
|
340,638 | $ | 13.69 | 525,287 | $ | 12.69 | ||||||||||
Information pertaining to options outstanding at June 30, 2012 is as follows:
|
Options Outstanding
|
Options Exercisable
|
||||||||||||||
|
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Average
|
Weighted
|
Weighted | |||||||||||||
|
Remaining
|
Average
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||
|
Number
|
Contractual
|
Exercise
|
Number
|
Exercise
|
|||||||||||
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
Outstanding
|
Life
|
Price
|
Exercisable
|
Price
|
||||||||||
|
$13.01 - $14.00
|
$ |
340,638
|
$ |
1.58
|
$ |
13.69
|
$ |
340,638
|
$ |
13.69
|
|||||
NOTE 12 – MINIMUM REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company and Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of its assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and core and tangible capital (as defined) to tangible assets (as defined). Management believes as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, that the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject.
F-27
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 12 – MINIMUM REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS (CONTINUED)
As of June 30, 2012, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following tables. There are no conditions or events since the notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category. The Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2012 and 2011 are also presented in the table.
|
Minimum To Be Well
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Minmimum Required
|
Capitalized Under
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For Capital
|
Prompt Corrective
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Actual
|
Adequacy Purposes
|
Action Provisions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
At June 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Risk-Based Capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(To Risk Weighted Assets)
|
$ | 46,815 | 13.42 | % | $ | 27,900 |
≥
|
8.0 | % | $ | 34,875 |
≥
|
10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
|
Tier 1 Capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(To Risk Weighted Assets)
|
42,437 | 12.17 | % | 13,950 |
≥
|
4.0 | % | 20,925 |
≥
|
6.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
Tier 1 Capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(To Average Assets)
|
42,437 | 8.23 | % | 20,634 |
≥
|
4.0 | % | 25,792 |
≥
|
5.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
At June 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Risk-Based Capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(To Risk Weighted Assets)
|
$ | 52,254 | 13.00 | % | $ | 32,168 |
≥
|
8.0 | % | $ | 40,210 |
≥
|
10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
|
Tier 1 Capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(To Risk Weighted Assets)
|
47,189 | 11.74 | % | 16,084 |
≥
|
4.0 | % | 24,126 |
≥
|
6.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
Tier 1 Capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(To Average Assets)
|
47,189 | 8.50 | % | 22,208 |
≥
|
4.0 | % | 27,760 |
≥
|
5.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
F-28
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 12 – MINIMUM REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS (CONTINUED)
The following table provides reconciliation between GAAP capital and the various categories of regulatory capital:
|
Bank
|
||||||||
|
June 30,
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
GAAP Capital
|
$ | 56,290 | $ | 59,337 | ||||
|
Adjustments:
|
||||||||
|
Deferred Taxes
|
(11,221 | ) | (9,711 | ) | ||||
|
Unrealized gains
|
(1,095 | ) | (459 | ) | ||||
|
Disallowed intangibles
|
(1,537 | ) | (1,978 | ) | ||||
|
Core, Tangible and Tier 1 Capital
|
42,437 | 47,189 | ||||||
|
Adjustments:
|
||||||||
|
Allowance for losses
|
4,378 | 5,065 | ||||||
|
Total Capital
|
$ | 46,815 | $ | 52,254 | ||||
NOTE 13 – RESTRICTIONS ON DIVIDENDS, LOANS AND ADVANCES
Federal and state banking regulations place certain restrictions on dividends paid and loans or advances made by the Bank to the Company. The total amount of dividends which may be paid at any date is generally limited to the retained earnings of the Bank, and loans or advances are limited to 10 percent of the Bank’s capital stock and surplus on a secured basis.
At June 30, 2012, the Bank’s retained earnings available for the payment of dividends was $0. Accordingly, $57,232 of the Company’s equity in the net assets of the Bank was restricted at June 30, 2012. Funds available for loans or advances by the Bank to the Company amounted to $5,629.
In addition, dividends paid by the Bank to the Company would be prohibited if the effect thereof would cause the Bank’s capital to be reduced below applicable minimum capital requirements.
NOTE 14 – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business. These financial instruments generally include commitments to originate mortgage loans. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized on the balance sheet. The Company’s maximum exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the borrower is represented by the contractual amount and related accrued interest receivable of those instruments. The Company minimizes this risk by evaluating each borrower’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. Collateral held by the Company consists of a first or second mortgage on the borrower’s property. The amount of collateral obtained is based upon an appraisal of the property.
F-29
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 15 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Commitments to originate mortgage loans are legally binding agreements to lend to the Company’s customers and generally expire in ninety days or less. There were no commitments at June 30, 2012 to originate adjustable-rate mortgage loans or to originate fixed-rate mortgage loans with a term of twenty years or less. The Company has $4,454 in unfunded letters of credit and $31,409 in unfunded lines of credit at June 30, 2012. The Company also has $8,452 in commitments to fund residential construction, commercial real estate construction and land development loans at June 30, 2012.
The Company has entered into an employment agreements with its President and CEO Anderson L. Smith and two other officers. Agreement stipulations are terms, duties, compensation and performance bonuses and provides remedies for all parties upon certain events occurring. Mr. Smith’s agreement provides for deferred compensation upon attaining the age of 65.
Upon completion of the Bank’s conversion from mutual to stock form, a “liquidation account” was established in an amount equal to the total equity of the Bank as of the latest practicable date prior to the conversion. The liquidation account was established to provide limited priority claim to the assets of the Bank to “eligible account holders”, as defined in the Plan of Conversion, who continue to maintain deposits in the Bank after the conversion. In the unlikely event of a complete liquidation of the Bank, and only in such event, each eligible account holder and supplemental eligible account holder would receive a liquidation distribution, prior to any payment to the holder of the Bank’s common stock. This distribution would be based upon each eligible account holder’s and supplemental eligible account holder’s proportionate share of the then total remaining qualifying deposits. At the time of the conversion, the liquidation account, which is an off-balance sheet memorandum account, amounted to $29.5 million.
NOTE 16 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In the ordinary course of business, the Company obtains products and services from directors or affiliates thereof. In the opinion of management, such transactions are made on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons.
F-30
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 17 – CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PARENT COMPANY
Financial information pertaining only to Jefferson Bancshares, Inc. is as follows:
|
Balance Sheet
|
June 30, 2012
|
||||
|
Assets
|
|||||
|
Cash and due from banks
|
$ | 659 | |||
|
Investment securities classified as available for sale, net
|
2 | ||||
|
Investment in common stock of Jefferson Federal Bank
|
56,290 | ||||
|
Investment in common stock of State of Franklin Statutory Trust II
|
1 | ||||
|
Loan receivable from ESOP
|
3,529 | ||||
|
Other assets
|
88 | ||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 60,569 | |||
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|||||
|
Accrued expenses
|
$ | 148 | |||
|
Other liabilities
|
546 | ||||
|
Subordinated debentures
|
7,246 | ||||
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
52,629 | ||||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 60,569 | |||
|
Year Ended
|
|||||
| Statement of Income |
June 30, 2012
|
||||
|
Dividends from Jefferson Federal Bank
|
$ | — | |||
|
Interest income
|
150 | ||||
|
Other income
|
3 | ||||
| Total income | 153 | ||||
|
Interest expense
|
330 | ||||
|
Other operating expenses
|
214 | ||||
|
Loss before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of Jefferson Federal Bank
|
(391 | ) | |||
|
Income tax
|
(156 | ) | |||
| (235 | ) | ||||
|
Equity in undistributed earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
|
(3,765 | ) | |||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (4,000 | ) | ||
F-31
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 17 – CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PARENT COMPANY (CONTINUED)
|
Year Ended
|
|||||
|
Statement of Cash Flows
|
June 30, 2012
|
||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|||||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (4,000 | ) | ||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|||||
| Equity in undistributed (earnings) loss of subsidiaries | 3,765 | ||||
| Deferred tax expense | (156 | ) | |||
| Amortization/accretion of intangibles | 112 | ||||
| Increase in other assets | 8 | ||||
| Increase in other liabilities | 115 | ||||
| Net cash used in operations | (156 | ) | |||
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||
| Return of principal on loan to ESOP | 430 | |||
| Net cash provided by investing activities | 430 | |||
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||
| Purchase of treasury stock | (7 | ) | ||
| Net cash used in financing activities | (7 | ) | ||
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
267 | |||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
392 | |||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$ | 659 | ||
F-32
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 18 – QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following table summarizes selected information regarding the Company’s results of operations for the periods indicated (in thousands except per share data):
|
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
|
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
March 31,
|
June 30,
|
|||||||||||||
|
2011
|
2011
|
2012
|
2012
|
|||||||||||||
|
Interest income
|
$ | 6,120 | $ | 5,775 | $ | 5,302 | $ | 5,235 | ||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
1,355 | 1,203 | 1,073 | 939 | ||||||||||||
|
Net interest income
|
4,765 | 4,572 | 4,229 | 4,296 | ||||||||||||
|
Provision for loan losses
|
2,986 | 5,687 | 600 | 600 | ||||||||||||
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
1,779 | (1,115 | ) | 3,629 | 3,696 | |||||||||||
|
Noninterest income
|
603 | 578 | 508 | 491 | ||||||||||||
|
Noninterest expense
|
4,020 | 5,095 | 3,772 | 3,806 | ||||||||||||
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
|
(1,638 | ) | (5,632 | ) | 365 | 381 | ||||||||||
|
Income taxes
|
(680 | ) | (1,965 | ) | 31 | 90 | ||||||||||
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
$ | (958 | ) | $ | (3,667 | ) | $ | 334 | $ | 291 | ||||||
|
Earnings (loss) per share, basic
|
$ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.59 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.05 | ||||||
|
Earnings (loss) per share, diluted
|
$ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.59 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.05 | ||||||
|
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
|
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
March 31,
|
June 30,
|
|||||||||||||
|
2010
|
2010
|
2011
|
2011
|
|||||||||||||
|
Interest income
|
$ | 6,856 | $ | 6,630 | $ | 6,565 | $ | 6,283 | ||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
2,508 | 2,198 | 1,818 | 1,506 | ||||||||||||
|
Net interest income
|
4,348 | 4,432 | 4,747 | 4,777 | ||||||||||||
|
Provision for loan losses
|
— | 950 | 1,400 | 2,097 | ||||||||||||
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
4,348 | 3,482 | 3,347 | 2,680 | ||||||||||||
|
Noninterest income
|
390 | 1,444 | 1,697 | (298 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Noninterest expense
|
4,353 | 4,387 | 4,635 | 4,036 | ||||||||||||
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
|
385 | 539 | 409 | (1,654 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Income taxes
|
126 | 180 | 149 | (806 | ) | |||||||||||
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
$ | 259 | $ | 359 | $ | 260 | $ | (848 | ) | |||||||
|
Earnings (loss) per share, basic
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.14 | ) | |||||||
|
Earnings (loss) per share, diluted
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.14 | ) | |||||||
F-33
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 19 – SUBORDINATED DEBT
As part of the State of Franklin acquisition, the Company acquired the State of Franklin Statutory Trust II (the “Trust”) and assumed the Trust’s obligation with respect to certain capital securities described below. On December 13, 2006, State of Franklin issued $10,310 of junior subordinated debentures to the Trust, a Delaware business trust wholly owned by State of Franklin. The Trust (a) sold $10,000 of capital securities through its underwriters to institutional investors and upstreamed the proceeds to State of Franklin and (b) issued $310 of common securities to State of Franklin. The sole assets of the Trust are the $10,310 of junior subordinated debentures issued by State of Franklin. The securities are redeemable at par after January 30, 2012, and have a final maturity January 30, 2037. The interest is payable quarterly at a floating rate equal to 3-month LIBOR plus 1.7%.
NOTE 20 – FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) establishes a hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Three levels of input may be used to measure fair value as follows:
Level 1
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury, other U.S. Government and agency mortgage-backed debt securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets.
Level 2
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain U.S. Government and agency mortgage-backed debt securities, corporate debt securities, derivative contracts and residential mortgage loans held-for-sale.
Level 3
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. This category generally includes certain private equity investments, retained residual interests in securitizations, residential mortgage servicing rights, and highly structured or long-term derivative contracts.
F-34
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 20 – FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES (CONTINUED)
Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value:
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
Level 2 investment securities classified as “available-for-sale” are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurements are based upon independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government-sponsored entities, municipal bonds, bonds issued by government agencies, and corporate debt securities. Level 3 investment securities classified as “available-for-sale” are recorded at fair value on at least a semi-annual basis. Fair value measurements are based upon independent pricing models based upon unobservable inputs which require significant management judgment or estimation. Level 3 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government-sponsored entities and other debt securities.
Impaired Loans
The Company records loans at fair value on a non-recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows.
Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At June 30, 2012, substantially all of the total impaired loans were evaluated based on either the fair value of the collateral or its liquidation value. In accordance with GAAP, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3.
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Below is a table that presents information about certain assets and liabilities measured at fair value:
| June 30, 2012 | |||||||||||||||
|
Total Carrying
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Amount in
|
Assets/Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||
| Fair Value Measurement Using |
Statement of
|
Measured at
|
|||||||||||||
|
Description
|
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Financial Condition | Fair Value | ||||||||||
|
Securities available for sale
|
$ |
—
|
$ |
82,738
|
$ |
745
|
$ |
83,483
|
$ |
83,483
|
|||||
F-35
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 20 – FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES (CONTINUED)
The following table below presents, for the year ending June 30, 2012, the changes in level 3 assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
Other
|
Transfers
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Balance at
|
Net
|
Comprehensive
|
In or Out
|
Balance at
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
June 30 2011
|
Income
|
Income
|
Sales
|
of Level 3
|
June 30, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Securities available for sale
|
$ | 3,248 | $ | (29 | ) | $ | (174 | ) | $ | (2,300 | ) | $ | — | $ | 745 | |||||||||
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2012 are included in the table below.
|
June 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||||
|
Total Gains
|
||||||||||||||
|
Fair Value Measurement Using
|
(Losses)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Description
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|||||||||||
|
Impaired Loans
|
$ |
—
|
$ |
—
|
|
$ |
21,549
|
$ |
(1,509
|
) | ||||
Individual loans with a carrying amount of $24,410 were written down to their fair value of $21,549 resulting in an impairment charge of $2,861 of which $1,509 was charged to earnings for the period. Loans applicable to write downs of impaired loans are estimated using the present value of expected cash flows or the appraised value of the underlying collateral discounted as necessary due to management’s estimates of changes in economic conditions.
F-36
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 20 – FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES (CONTINUED)
The carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:
|
June 30, 2012
|
June 30, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Carrying
|
Fair
|
Carrying
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||
|
Amount
|
Value
|
Amount
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
|
Financial assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Cash and due from banks and interest-earning deposits with banks
|
$ | 56,693 | $ | 56,693 | $ | 40,548 | $ | 40,548 | ||||||||
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
83,483 | 83,483 | 74,780 | 74,780 | ||||||||||||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
4,735 | 4,735 | 4,735 | 4,735 | ||||||||||||
|
Loans receivable
|
322,499 | 330,664 | 378,587 | 379,787 | ||||||||||||
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
1,575 | 1,575 | 1,832 | 1,832 | ||||||||||||
|
Loans held-for-sale
|
381 | 381 | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Financial liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Deposits
|
(423,882 | ) | (424,523 | ) | (454,262 | ) | (455,106 | ) | ||||||||
|
Borrowed funds
|
(38,261 | ) | (40,064 | ) | (38,887 | ) | (40,718 | ) | ||||||||
|
Subordinated debentures
|
(7,245 | ) | (4,200 | ) | (7,133 | ) | (6,277 | ) | ||||||||
|
Off-balance sheet assets (liabilities):
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
— | 8,452 | — | 11,932 | ||||||||||||
|
Unused letters of credit
|
— | 4,454 | — | 4,809 | ||||||||||||
|
Unused lines of credit
|
— | 31,409 | — | 34,362 | ||||||||||||
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and due from banks and interest-earning deposits with banks - The carrying amounts for these assets approximates fair value.
Investment securities – See the discussion presented on Page 36 concerning assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
Federal Home Loan Bank stock - The fair value for FHLB stock is the carrying value due to restrictions placed on transferability.
Loans held-for-sale – The fair value of loans held-for-sale is the carrying value since these loans have a commitment to be purchased by a third party.
Loans receivable, net - the fair value is based on discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms and for similar maturities. The estimated fair value of loans is adjusted for the allowance for loan losses.
Accrued interest receivable - The carrying amounts of accrued interest receivable approximate fair value.
.
Bank-owned life insurance - The carrying value of this asset is the cash surrender value, which approximates fair value.
Deposits - The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity is equal to the amount payable on demand. The fair value of time deposits is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses. The discount rate is estimated using rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Borrowed Money - The estimated fair value of debt is based on current rates for similar financing.
Subordinated debt - The fair value for subordinated debt is estimated based on a third party indication of fair value at the respective dates.
F-37
JEFFERSON BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands)
NOTE 21 – CORE DEPOSIT INTANGIBLE (CDI)
CDI is composed of the following:
|
June 30,
|
||||||||
|
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
|
Beginning balance of core deposit intangible
|
$ | 1,978 | $ | 2,475 | ||||
|
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
(441 | ) | (497 | ) | ||||
|
Core deposit intangible, net
|
$ | 1,537 | $ | 1,978 | ||||
CDI is amortized using an accelerated method over 10 years.
Future amortization of CDI is as follows:
|
Year Ending June 30,
|
||||
|
2013
|
$ | 386 | ||
|
2014
|
330 | |||
|
2015
|
275 | |||
|
2016
|
219 | |||
|
2017
|
163 | |||
|
Thereafter
|
164 | |||
Amortization expense related to CDI is $411 and $497 for the years ending June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
NOTE 22 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through September 7, 2012 for potential recognition and disclosure for the year ended June 30, 2012. No items were identified during this evaluation that required adjustment to or disclosure in the accompanying financial statements.
F-38