Attached files

file filename
8-K - 8-K - Venoco, Inc.a12-10949_18k.htm

Exhibit 99.1

 

GRAPHIC

NEWS

RELEASE

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

VENOCO, INC. ANNOUNCES 1st QUARTER 2012 FINANCIAL

AND OPERATIONAL RESULTS

 

Production of 1.6 Million BOE or 17,425 BOE/d
Oil Volumes Up More Than 4% Compared to 4Q 2011

 

 

DENVER, COLORADO, May 1, 2012 /Marketwire/Venoco, Inc. (NYSE: VQ) today reported financial and operational results for the first quarter of 2012.  The company reported a net loss for the quarter of $27.9 million on total revenues of $85.4 million.

 

Adjusted Earnings, which adjusts for unrealized derivative gains and losses and certain one-time charges, were $38.5 million for the quarter up from $20.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2011. Adjusted EBITDA was $87.8 million in the quarter, up from $67.1 million in the fourth quarter.  Please see the end of this release for definitions of Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of those measures to net income/loss.

 

Highlights include the following:

 

·                  Production of 1.6 million barrels of oil equivalent (MMBOE) for the quarter, or 17,425 BOE per day (BOE/d).

 

·                  Daily oil volumes up 4.5% in first quarter compared to fourth quarter 2011.

 

·                  Ellwood pipeline completed ahead of schedule and in service at the end of January. Transportation savings and higher price realization improve field economics.

 

·                  Adjusted EBITDA of $87.8 million and Adjusted Earnings of $38.5 million which include $41.2 million from monetization of the company’s 2012 natural gas hedges.

 

“We continue to be active in our oily, Southern California legacy assets, with the added benefit of crude oil prices that surpass WTI,” said Ed O’Donnell, Venoco’s Chief Operating Officer and incoming CEO.  “We’re drilling in our three main oil fields and expect

 

1



 

to grow oil volumes this year which will offset the declines we expect in natural gas production volumes as we limit capital expenditures in the Sacramento Basin due to substantially lower prevailing natural gas prices.”

 

First Quarter Production

 

Production in the first quarter of 2012 of 17,425 BOE/d was down 2% from the fourth quarter of 2011 as well as down 2% from the first quarter of 2011. Daily average oil volumes, however, were up 4.5% in the first quarter of 2012 compared to the fourth quarter of 2011 and revenue, over the same period, increased about 2.4%. Daily oil volumes in the first quarter at the company’s West Montalvo field are up approximately 10% over the fourth quarter of 2011 and up over 30% from the first quarter of 2011.

 

“We are pleased to see our daily oil volumes, as we expected, beginning to increase this year. This will both offset BOE declines from our natural gas assets, and allow us to realize the fifty to one price premium on oil versus natural gas,” commented Mr. O’Donnell.  “While we are guiding to rather flat production in 2012 compared with 2011, we expect the increase in our oil to natural gas mix coupled with higher realized oil prices to result in significant revenue growth. As we stated at year-end, we believe our production forecasting from the Sevier field will prove to be conservative. If that is the case, we would see further increases in our oil volumes and revenues in 2012,” Mr. O’Donnell added.

 

The following table details the company’s daily production by region (BOE(1)/d):

 

 

 

Quarter ended

 

Region

 

3/31/11

 

12/31/11

 

3/31/12

 

Sacramento Basin

 

10,591

 

10,635

 

9,970

 

Southern California

 

7,224

 

7,175

 

7,455

 

Total

 

17,815

 

17,810

 

17,425

 

 


(1) Barrel of oil equivalent (BOE) is calculated using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one barrel of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.

 

First Quarter Costs

 

Venoco’s first quarter 2012 lease operating expenses of $15.42 per BOE were up from the fourth quarter and full-year 2011 levels which were $13.87 and $14.64 per BOE respectively. Costs in the first quarter were higher due primarily to non-recurring maintenance at Platforms Gail and Holly and inventory cost of sales related to emptying the oil tanks at the company’s marine terminal.

 

The following table details certain of the company’s per BOE metrics for the indicated quarter:

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

UNAUDITED (per BOE)

 

3/31/11

 

12/31/11

 

3/31/12

 

Lease Operating Expenses

 

$

13.52

 

$

13.87

 

$

15.42

 

Production/Property Taxes

 

0.97

 

0.97

 

1.02

 

DD&A Expense

 

13.53

 

13.43

 

14.03

 

G&A Expense (1) 

 

5.22

 

5.46

 

5.37

 

 

2



 


(1)          Net of amounts capitalized and excluding stock-based compensation costs and costs related to the going-private transaction.  See the end of this release for a reconciliation of G&A per BOE.

 

Capital Investment First Quarter 2012

 

Venoco’s first quarter capital expenditures for exploration, development and other spending were $62 million, including $46 million for drilling and rework activities, $6 million for facilities, and $10 million for land, seismic and capitalized G&A.

 

In the Sacramento Basin, the company spent $10 million or 17% of its first quarter capital expenditures, spudding three wells and performing 95 recompletions. The company’s 2012 budget provides for total capital expenditures of $32 million in the basin. The budget contemplates drilling two additional wells and performing a total of 180 recompletions and seven hydraulic fractures, however, in light of low natural gas prices, the company has curtailed drilling in the Sacramento Basin.

 

The company’s Southern California legacy fields accounted for $29 million or 47% of its first quarter capital expenditures. Three wells were spud at the West Montalvo field, all to offshore bottom-hole locations. The company completed one of those wells in the quarter along with two other wells that were spud in 2011. Another of those wells was completed early in the second quarter. At the Sockeye field, the company spud one well in the quarter. That dual-completion well targets production from the Monterey shale formation and also injects into the Upper Topanga waterflood. At the South Ellwood field, the company spud one well late in the quarter, which was recently completed and expects to spud a second well this week. Both wells at South Ellwood target the Monterey shale.

 

The company’s 2012 capital expenditure budget for legacy Southern California properties is $123 million and includes plans to drill seven wells at West Montalvo. The company plans to drill three wells in 2012 at the Sockeye field and four wells at the South Ellwood field. The company expects production levels from its Southern California legacy fields to grow 15-20% in 2012 compared with 2011.

 

The company had onshore Monterey capital expenditures of $22 million or 35% of its total first quarter capital expenditures. As part of this activity, the company spud two wells in the first quarter of 2012 in the Sevier field, one of which was completed in the quarter. The company also recompleted a well it drilled in 2011 in its acreage in the greater San Joaquin Valley.

 

The company’s 2012 capital expenditure budget for the onshore Monterey shale development is $100 million, focused on delineation and production at the Sevier field where the company plans to spud 15 to 20 wells. The company also plans to acquire seismic data at the Sevier and Salinas fields and to recomplete several wells located in its greater San Joaquin leasehold.

 

“We are anxious to see sustained results, but we have had several good well tests on recent completions. One zone flowed at a peak, 24-hour gross rate of 143 barrels of oil per day. In another well, we had a peak, 24-hour gross flowback rate of 196 barrels of oil per day from one zone and 98 barrels of oil per day from a second zone. Coupled with the

 

3



 

recent test results, the fundamental well data — geology, logs, cores and production testing — is still very encouraging,” commented Mr. O’Donnell.  “We are currently forecasting minimal production volumes from Sevier on an annualized basis, but we believe there is a good chance we’ll see sustained production before the end of the year.”

 

The company entered into a new crude oil sales contract on February 1, 2012 for its South Ellwood field concurrent with commencement of shipping production via the new pipeline. The contract is tied to Napo prices — an Ecuadorian, waterborne crude — that has been tracking above WTI. Venoco’s current price realization for South Ellwood crude with the new contract compared to the previous contract is about $10 to $15 per barrel higher.

 

The balance of the company’s crude oil, as of April 1st is sold under a contract tied to California postings at the Buena Vista field. The effect of the new contract on price realizations for crude from those fields in April has been positive by about $20 per barrel. The company’s oil hedging contracts include basis swaps between WTI and Brent that have reduced the net by approximately $10 per barrel.

 

2012 Guidance

 

The following summarizes the company’s 2012 guidance:

·                  Production: 17,750 — 18,250 BOE/d

·                  Capital Budget: $255 million

·                  Lease Operating Expenses: $15.00 — $15.50 per BOE

·                  General & Administrative Expenses: $5.25 — $5.50 per BOE

·                  Production & Property Taxes: $1.00 - $1.10 per BOE

·                  DD&A: $15.00 — $15.50 per BOE

 

Special Committee Process

 

On January 16, 2012, the company announced that it had entered into a definitive merger agreement under which Tim Marquez, Venoco’s Chairman and CEO, will, through a wholly owned affiliate, acquire all of the outstanding shares of Venoco he does not already own for $12.50 per share in cash.  Mr. Marquez is currently the beneficial owner of approximately 50.3% of Venoco’s common stock.

 

Completion of the transaction is subject to certain closing conditions, including procurement of financing. The merger agreement also contains a non-waivable condition that a majority of the outstanding shares of Venoco not owned by Mr. Marquez and his affiliates, or by any director, officer or employee of Venoco or its subsidiaries, vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement. Shareholders are cautioned that there can be no assurance that the company will complete the merger.

 

Earnings Conference Call

 

Venoco will host a conference call to discuss results today, Tuesday, May 1, 2012 at 12:00 p.m. Eastern time (10 a.m. Mountain).  The conference call will be webcast and

 

4



 

those wanting to listen may do so by using a link on the Investor Relations page of the company’s website at http://www.venocoinc.com.  Those wanting to participate in the Q & A portion can call (800) 237-9752 and use conference code 50520898. International participants can call (617) 847-8706 and use the same conference code.

 

A replay of the conference call will be available for one week by calling (888) 286-8010 or, for international callers, (617) 801-6888, and using passcode 40970132.  The replay will also be available on the Venoco website for 30 days.

 

About the Company

 

Venoco is an independent energy company primarily engaged in the acquisition, exploitation and development of oil and natural gas properties primarily in California.  Venoco operates three offshore platforms in the Santa Barbara Channel, has non-operated interests in three other platforms, operates three onshore properties in Southern California, and has extensive operations in Northern California’s Sacramento Basin.

 

Forward-looking Statements

 

Statements made in this news release relating to Venoco’s future production, expenses, revenue, price realizations, oil/gas production mix, reserves, capital expenditures and development projects, and all other statements except statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements are based on assumptions and estimates that management believes are reasonable based on currently available information; however, management’s assumptions and the company’s future performance are both subject to a wide range of business risks and uncertainties and there is no assurance that these goals and projections can or will be met. Any number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the timing and extent of changes in oil and gas prices, the timing and results of drilling and other development activities, the availability and cost of obtaining drilling equipment and technical personnel, risks associated with the availability of acceptable transportation arrangements and the possibility of unanticipated operational problems, delays in completing production, treatment and transportation facilities, higher than expected production costs and other expenses, and pipeline curtailments by third parties. The company’s activities with respect to the onshore Monterey Shale and other projects are subject to numerous operating, geological and other risks and may not be successful. The company’s results in the onshore Monterey Shale will be subject to greater risks than in areas where it has more data and drilling and production experience. Results from the company’s onshore Monterey Shale project will depend on, among other things, its ability to identify productive intervals and drilling and completion techniques necessary to achieve commercial production from those intervals. The closing of the merger agreement with Mr. Marquez is subject to a number of conditions, including a financing condition and a non-waivable condition that a majority of the outstanding shares of Venoco not owned by Mr. Marquez and his affiliates or by any director, officer or employee of Venoco or its subsidiaries vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement, and those conditions may not be satisfied. All forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof and the company undertakes no

 

5



 

obligation to update any such statement. Further information on risks and uncertainties that may affect the Company’s operations and financial performance, and the forward-looking statements made herein, is available in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which are incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein.

 

References to reserve estimates other than proved are by their nature more uncertain than estimates of proved reserves, and are subject to substantially greater risk of not actually being realized by the company.

 

For further information, please contact Mike Edwards, Vice President, (303) 626-8320; http://www.venocoinc.com; E-Mail investor@venocoinc.com.

 

Source: Venoco, Inc. 

/////

 

6


 


 

OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION AND PRICES

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Quarter Ended

 

UNAUDITED

 

12/31/11

 

3/31/12

 

%
Change

 

3/31/11

 

3/31/12

 

%
Change

 

Production Volume:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil (MBbls) (1) 

 

620

 

641

 

3

%

608

 

641

 

5

%

Natural Gas (MMcf)

 

6,111

 

5,668

 

-7

%

5,972

 

5,668

 

-5

%

MBOE

 

1,639

 

1,586

 

-3

%

1,603

 

1,586

 

-1

%

Daily Average Production Volume:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil (Bbls/d)

 

6,739

 

7,044

 

5

%

6,756

 

7,044

 

4

%

Natural Gas (Mcf/d)

 

66,424

 

62,286

 

-6

%

66,356

 

62,286

 

-6

%

BOE/d

 

17,810

 

17,425

 

-2

%

17,815

 

17,425

 

-2

%

Oil Price per Barrel Produced (in dollars):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Realized price before hedging

 

$

93.79

 

$

98.66

 

5

%

$

86.38

 

$

98.66

 

14

%

Realized hedging gain (loss)

 

(1.35

)

(5.75

)

326

%

(1.51

)

(5.75

)

281

%

Net realized price

 

$

92.44

 

$

92.91

 

1

%

$

84.87

 

$

92.91

 

9

%

Natural Gas Price per Mcf (in dollars):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Realized price before hedging

 

$

3.60

 

$

2.76

 

-23

%

$

4.03

 

$

2.76

 

-32

%

Realized hedging gain (loss)

 

1.29

 

0.63

 

-51

%

1.07

 

0.63

 

-41

%

Net realized price

 

$

4.89

 

$

3.39

 

-31

%

$

5.10

 

$

3.39

 

-34

%

Expense per BOE (in dollars):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease operating expenses

 

$

13.87

 

$

15.42

 

11

%

$

13.52

 

$

15.42

 

14

%

Production and property taxes

 

$

0.97

 

$

1.02

 

5

%

$

0.97

 

$

1.02

 

5

%

Transportation expenses

 

$

1.42

 

$

2.78

 

96

%

$

1.24

 

$

2.78

 

124

%

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

$

13.43

 

$

14.03

 

4

%

$

13.53

 

$

14.03

 

4

%

General and administrative (2) 

 

$

6.89

 

$

7.79

 

13

%

$

6.13

 

$

7.79

 

27

%

Interest expense

 

$

10.03

 

$

9.91

 

-1

%

$

7.92

 

$

9.91

 

25

%

 


(1)  Amounts shown are oil production volumes for offshore properties and sales volumes for onshore properties (differences between onshore production and sales volumes are minimal). Revenue accruals are adjusted for actual sales volumes since offshore oil inventories can vary significantly from month to month based on pipeline inventories, oil pipeline sales nominations, and prior to February 2012, the timing of barge deliveries and oil in tanks.

(2)  Net of amounts capitalized.

 

-  more -

 

7



 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

UNAUDITED (In thousands)

 

3/31/11

 

12/31/11

 

3/31/12

 

REVENUES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil and natural gas sales

 

$

78,319

 

$

81,890

 

$

83,388

 

Other

 

871

 

1,478

 

1,975

 

Total revenues

 

79,190

 

83,368

 

85,363

 

EXPENSES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease operating expense

 

21,676

 

22,740

 

24,450

 

Property and production taxes

 

1,548

 

1,593

 

1,615

 

Transportation expense

 

1,986

 

2,325

 

4,412

 

Depletion, depreciation and amortization

 

21,691

 

22,007

 

22,254

 

Accretion of asset retirement obligation

 

1,590

 

1,602

 

1,391

 

General and administrative

 

9,829

 

11,297

 

12,361

 

Total expenses

 

58,320

 

61,564

 

66,483

 

Income from operations

 

20,870

 

21,804

 

18,880

 

FINANCING COSTS AND OTHER:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

12,697

 

16,435

 

15,711

 

Interest rate derivative realized (gains) losses

 

41,147

 

 

 

Interest rate derivative unrealized (gains) losses

 

(40,064

)

 

 

Amortization of deferred loan costs

 

531

 

595

 

569

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

1,357

 

 

 

Commodity derivative realized (gains) losses

 

(5,468

)

(19,110

)

(41,096

)

Commodity derivative unrealized (gains) losses and amortization of derivative premiums

 

34,595

 

(6,538

)

71,634

 

Total financing costs and other

 

44,795

 

(8,618

)

46,818

 

Income (loss) before taxes

 

(23,925

)

30,422

 

(27,938

)

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(23,925

)

$

30,422

 

$

(27,938

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

56,159

 

58,772

 

58,910

 

Diluted

 

56,159

 

58,821

 

58,910

 

 

8



 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION

 

UNAUDITED ($ in thousands)

 

12/31/11

 

3/31/12

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

8,165

 

$

23

 

Accounts receivable

 

30,017

 

29,810

 

Inventories

 

7,411

 

6,900

 

Other current assets

 

4,296

 

3,966

 

Commodity derivatives

 

47,768

 

5,398

 

Total current assets

 

97,657

 

46,097

 

Net property, plant and equipment

 

810,465

 

850,771

 

Total other assets

 

21,622

 

21,393

 

TOTAL ASSETS

 

$

929,744

 

$

918,261

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

$

53,098

 

$

46,254

 

Interest payable

 

21,854

 

6,182

 

Commodity and interest derivatives

 

2,490

 

23,714

 

Total current liabilities

 

77,442

 

76,150

 

LONG-TERM DEBT

 

686,958

 

694,141

 

COMMODITY AND INTEREST DERIVATIVES

 

308

 

6,682

 

ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

 

92,008

 

93,587

 

Total liabilities

 

856,716

 

870,560

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

73,028

 

47,701

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

$

929,744

 

$

918,261

 

 

9



 

GAAP RECONCILIATIONS

 

Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA

 

In addition to net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP, we have provided in this release our Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA for recent periods.  Both Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures that we use as supplemental measures of our performance.

 

We define Adjusted Earnings as net income (loss) before the effects of the items listed in the table below.  We calculate the tax effect of reconciling items by re-performing our period-end tax calculation excluding the reconciling items from earnings.  The difference between this calculation and the tax expense/benefit recorded for the period results in the tax effect disclosed below.  We believe that Adjusted Earnings facilitates comparisons to earnings forecasts prepared by stock analysts and other third parties. Such forecasts generally exclude the effects of items that are difficult to predict or to measure in advance and are not directly related to our ongoing operations. Adjusted Earnings should not be considered a substitute for net income (loss) as reported in accordance with GAAP.

 

We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) before the effects of the items listed in the table below.  Because the use of Adjusted EBITDA facilitates comparisons of our historical operating performance on a more consistent basis, we use this measure for business planning and analysis purposes, in assessing acquisition opportunities and in determining how potential external financing sources are likely to evaluate our business.

 

We present Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted EBITDA because we consider them to be important supplemental measures of our performance.  Neither Adjusted Earnings nor Adjusted EBITDA is a measurement of our financial performance under GAAP and neither should be considered as an alternative to net income (loss), operating income or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP, as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities or as a measure of our liquidity. You should not assume that the Adjusted Earnings or Adjusted EBITDA amounts shown are comparable to similarly named measures disclosed by other companies.

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

UNAUDITED ($ in thousands)

 

3/31/11

 

12/31/11

 

3/31/12

 

Adjusted Earnings Reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income

 

$

(23,925

)

$

30,422

 

$

(27,938

)

Plus:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized commodity (gains) losses

 

32,605

 

(10,626

)

63,839

 

Unrealized interest rate derivative (gains) losses

 

(40,064

)

 

 

Going private related costs

 

 

750

 

2,628

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

1,357

 

 

 

Settlement of interest rate swap contracts

 

38,065

 

 

 

Tax effects

 

 

 

 

Adjusted Earnings

 

$

8,038

 

$

20,546

 

$

38,529

 

 

10



 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

UNAUDITED ($ in thousands)

 

3/31/11

 

12/31/11

 

3/31/12

 

Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

(23,925

)

$

30,422

 

$

(27,938

)

Interest expense

 

12,697

 

16,435

 

15,711

 

Interest rate derivative (gains) losses - realized

 

41,147

 

 

 

Income taxes

 

 

 

 

DD&A

 

21,691

 

22,007

 

22,254

 

Accretion of asset retirement obligation

 

1,590

 

1,602

 

1,391

 

Amortization of deferred loan costs

 

531

 

595

 

569

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

1,357

 

 

 

Share-based payments

 

1,824

 

1,781

 

1,540

 

Going private related costs

 

 

750

 

2,628

 

Amortization of derivative premiums

 

1,990

 

4,088

 

7,795

 

Unrealized commodity derivative (gains) losses

 

32,605

 

(10,626

)

63,839

 

Unrealized interest rate derivative (gains) losses

 

(40,064

)

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

51,443

 

$

67,054

 

$

87,789

 

 

We also provide per BOE G&A expenses excluding costs associated with the going-private transaction, and share-based compensation charges.  We believe that these non-GAAP measures are useful in that the items excluded do not represent cash expenses directly related to our ongoing operations.  These non-GAAP measures should not be viewed as an alternative to per BOE G&A expenses as determined in accordance with GAAP.

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

UNAUDITED ($ in thousands, except per BOE amounts)

 

3/31/11

 

12/31/11

 

3/31/12

 

G&A per BOE Reconciliation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

G&A expense

 

$

9,829

 

$

11,297

 

$

12,361

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

(1,454

)

(1,591

)

(1,220

)

Going private related costs

 

 

(750

)

(2,628

)

G&A Expense Excluding Share-Based Comp Going Private Costs

 

8,375

 

8,956

 

8,513

 

MBOE

 

1,603

 

1,639

 

1,586

 

G&A Expense per BOE Excluding Share-Based Comp and Going Private Costs

 

$

5.22

 

$

5.46

 

$

5.37

 

 

11



 

PV-10

 

The present value of future net cash flows (PV-10 value) is a non-GAAP measure because it excludes income tax effects. Management believes that before-tax cash flow amounts are useful for evaluative purposes since future income taxes, which are affected by a company’s unique tax position and strategies, can make after-tax amounts less comparable. We derive PV-10 value based on the present value of estimated future revenues to be generated from the production of proved reserves, net of estimated production and future development costs and future plugging and abandonment costs, using the arithmetic twelve-month average of the first of the month prices without giving effect to hedging activities or future escalation, and costs as of the date of estimate without future escalation, non-property related expenses such as general and administrative expenses, debt service and depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment and income taxes, and discounted using an annual discount rate of 10%. Management also believes that the PV-10 based on the NYMEX 5-year forward strip pricing is useful for evaluative purposes since the use of a strip price provides a measure based on current market perception.

 

The following table reconciles the standardized measure of future net cash flows to PV-10 value (in thousands):

 

UNAUDITED ($ in thousands)

 

12/31/2011

 

 

 

 

 

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

 

$

1,364,146

 

Add: Present value of future income tax discounted at 10%

 

442,355

 

PV-10 at year end SEC prices

 

1,806,501

 

Add: Effect of five year NYMEX strip at December 31, 2011

 

(43,180

)

PV-10 at five year NYMEX strip at December 31, 2011

 

$

1,763,321

 

 

- end -

 

12