Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUSTFinancial_Report.xls
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUSTc24245exv31w1.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUSTc24245exv32w2.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUSTc24245exv32w1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUSTc24245exv31w2.htm
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011.
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     .
Commission File Number 1-31824
FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
MARYLAND   37-1470730
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)   Identification No.)
7600 Wisconsin Avenue, 11th Floor, Bethesda, MD 20814
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(301) 986-9200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filter,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
o Large Accelerated Filer   þ Accelerated Filer   o Non-Accelerated Filer   o Smaller Reporting Company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) YES o NO þ
As of November 4, 2011, there were 50,291,606 common shares, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.
 
 

 

 


 

FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
         
    Page  
       
 
       
       
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    7  
 
       
    27  
 
       
    55  
 
       
    56  
 
       
       
 
       
    57  
 
       
    57  
 
       
    57  
 
       
    57  
 
       
    57  
 
       
    57  
 
       
    57  
 
       
    59  
 
       
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32.1
 Exhibit 32.2
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

 

2


Table of Contents

FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
                 
    September 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    (unaudited)        
Assets:
               
Rental property, net
  $ 1,427,788     $ 1,217,897  
Cash and cash equivalents
    14,646       33,280  
Escrows and reserves
    16,730       8,070  
Accounts and other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,138 and $3,246, respectively
    7,935       7,238  
Accrued straight-line rents, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $360 and $849, respectively
    16,337       12,771  
Notes receivable, net
    54,644       24,750  
Investment in affiliates
    24,338       23,721  
Deferred costs, net
    33,447       20,174  
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    18,331       14,230  
Intangible assets, net
    59,587       34,551  
 
           
 
               
Total assets
  $ 1,673,783     $ 1,396,682  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities:
               
Mortgage loans
  $ 420,089     $ 319,096  
Exchangeable senior notes, net
    30,357       29,936  
Senior notes
    75,000       75,000  
Secured term loans
    30,000       110,000  
Unsecured term loan
    175,000        
Unsecured revolving credit facility
    142,000       191,000  
Accounts payable and other liabilities
    50,902       16,827  
Accrued interest
    4,157       2,170  
Rents received in advance
    7,129       7,049  
Tenant security deposits
    5,574       5,390  
Deferred market rent, net
    5,049       6,032  
 
           
 
               
Total liabilities
    945,257       762,500  
 
           
 
               
Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership (redemption value of $36,419 and $16,122, respectively)
    39,360       16,122  
 
               
Equity:
               
Series A Preferred Shares, $25 par value, 50,000 shares authorized: 4,600 and 0 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
    115,000        
Common shares, $0.001 par value, 150,000 common shares authorized: 50,061 and 49,922 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
    50       50  
Additional paid-in capital
    795,480       794,051  
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated partnerships
    5,237       3,077  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (5,405 )     (545 )
Dividends in excess of accumulated earnings
    (221,196 )     (178,573 )
 
           
 
               
Total equity
    689,166       618,060  
 
           
 
               
Total liabilities, noncontrolling interests and equity
  $ 1,673,783     $ 1,396,682  
 
           
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Revenues:
                               
Rental
  $ 36,121     $ 27,520     $ 103,025     $ 80,665  
Tenant reimbursements and other
    8,993       6,179       24,776       19,791  
 
                       
 
                               
Total revenues
    45,114       33,699       127,801       100,456  
 
                       
 
                               
Operating expenses:
                               
Property operating
    11,211       7,672       31,476       24,272  
Real estate taxes and insurance
    4,253       2,948       12,284       9,339  
General and administrative
    4,354       3,475       12,546       10,859  
Acquisition costs
    1,737       361       4,475       2,025  
Depreciation and amortization
    16,088       10,608       45,381       30,487  
Impairment of real estate asset
    3,111             3,111        
Change in contingent consideration related to acquisition of property
    (1,487 )           (1,487 )     710  
 
                       
 
                               
Total operating expenses
    39,267       25,064       107,786       77,692  
 
                       
 
                               
Operating income
    5,847       8,635       20,015       22,764  
 
                       
 
                               
Other expenses, net:
                               
Interest expense
    11,207       8,431       30,307       25,333  
Interest and other income
    (1,534 )     (89 )     (3,769 )     (285 )
Equity in losses of affiliates
    81       75       112       134  
Gain on early retirement of debt
                      (164 )
 
                       
 
                               
Total other expenses, net
    9,754       8,417       26,650       25,018  
 
                       
 
                               
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
    (3,907 )     218       (6,635 )     (2,254 )
 
                       
 
                               
Benefit from income taxes
    195             655        
 
                       
 
                               
(Loss) income from continuing operations
    (3,712 )     218       (5,980 )     (2,254 )
 
                       
 
                               
Discontinued operations:
                               
Loss from operations of disposed properties
          (3,153 )     (2,827 )     (3,412 )
Gain on sale of real estate properties
                1,954       557  
 
                       
 
                               
Loss from discontinued operations
          (3,153 )     (873 )     (2,855 )
 
                       
 
                               
Net loss
    (3,712 )     (2,935 )     (6,853 )     (5,109 )
 
                       
 
                               
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
    265       55       469       103  
 
                       
 
                               
Net loss attributable to First Potomac Realty Trust
    (3,447 )     (2,880 )     (6,384 )     (5,006 )
 
                       
 
                               
Less: Dividends on preferred shares
    (2,228 )           (6,239 )      
 
                       
 
                               
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
  $ (5,675 )   $ (2,880 )   $ (12,623 )   $ (5,006 )
 
                       
 
                               
Basic and diluted earnings per share:
                               
(Loss) income from continuing operations
  $ (0.12 )   $     $ (0.25 )   $ (0.08 )
Loss from discontinued operations
          (0.08 )     (0.02 )     (0.08 )
 
                       
Net loss
  $ (0.12 )   $ (0.08 )   $ (0.27 )   $ (0.16 )
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
                               
Basic and diluted
    49,308       37,269       49,275       34,804  
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

 

4


Table of Contents

FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands)
                 
    Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2011     2010  
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net loss
  $ (6,853 )   $ (5,109 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Discontinued operations:
               
Gain on sale of real estate properties
    (1,954 )     (557 )
Depreciation and amortization
    520       231  
Impairment of real estate assets
    2,710       4,013  
Depreciation and amortization
    45,949       31,978  
Stock based compensation
    2,012       2,869  
Bad debt expense
    667       767  
Benefit from income taxes
    (656 )      
Amortization of deferred market rent
    (505 )     (1,044 )
Amortization of financing costs and discounts
    1,891       539  
Amortization of rent abatement
    2,042       1,806  
Equity in losses of affiliates
    112       134  
Distributions from investments in affiliates
    84       437  
Contingent consideration related to acquisition of property
    (1,487 )     710  
Gain on early retirement of debt
          (164 )
Impairment of real estate assets
    3,111        
Changes in assets and liabilities:
               
Escrows and reserves
    (6,411 )     (955 )
Accounts and other receivables
    (167 )     (1,349 )
Accrued straight-line rents
    (5,771 )     (1,220 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    (1,683 )     (497 )
Tenant security deposits
    183       (155 )
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    5,773       1,160  
Accrued interest
    1,986       1,716  
Rents received in advance
    89       (174 )
Deferred costs
    (14,841 )     (5,500 )
 
           
Total adjustments
    33,654       34,745  
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    26,801       29,636  
 
           
 
               
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Purchase deposit on future acquisitions
    (8,168 )     (3,018 )
Purchase of mortgage loan
          (7,970 )
Proceeds from sales of real estate assets
    26,883       11,414  
Change in escrow and reserves
    (2,020 )      
Investment in note receivable
    (29,350 )      
Acquisition of rental property and associated intangible assets
    (67,583 )     (81,492 )
Additions to rental property
    (26,540 )     (12,017 )
Acquisition of land parcel
    (7,500 )      
Additions to construction in progress
    (11,938 )     (2,484 )
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures
    (650 )      
Deconsolidation of joint venture
          (896 )
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (126,866 )     (96,463 )
 
           
 
               
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Financing costs
    (4,063 )     (1,327 )
Issuance of debt
    348,000       90,000  
Issuance of common shares, net
          94,258  
Issuance of preferred shares, net
    110,997        
Contributions from joint venture partners
    2,152        
Repayments of debt
    (339,471 )     (94,782 )
Dividends to common shareholders
    (30,000 )     (21,115 )
Dividends to preferred shareholders
    (5,125 )      
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
    (1,142 )     (439 )
Stock option exercises
    83       22  
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    81,431       66,617  
 
           
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (18,634 )     (210 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    33,280       9,320  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 14,646     $ 9,110  
 
           
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Continued
(unaudited)
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information for the nine months ended September 30 are as follows (amounts in thousands):
                 
    2011     2010  
Cash paid for interest, net
  $ 26,292     $ 23,059  
Cash paid for income based franchise taxes
    242        
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
               
Debt assumed in connection with acquisitions of real estate
    139,373        
Contingent consideration recorded in connection with acquisition of real estate
    745        
Conversion of Operating Partnership units into common shares
    19       55  
Issuance of Operating Partnership units in connection with acquisitions of real estate
    28,845        
Cash paid for interest on indebtedness is net of capitalized interest of $1.3 million and $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, 1,300 Operating Partnership units were redeemed for an equivalent number of the Company’s common shares. No Operating Partnership units were redeemed for an equivalent number of the Company’s common shares during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 the Company acquired six consolidated properties at an aggregate purchase price of $251.5 million, including the assumption of mortgage debt with an aggregate fair value of $139.4 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 1,963,388 Operating Partnership units valued at $28.8 million in connection with the acquisition of 840 First Street, NE, which was acquired for an aggregate purchase price of $90.0 million, with up to $10.0 million of additional consideration payable upon the terms of a lease renewal by the building’s sole tenant or the re-tenanting of the property. As a result, the Company recorded a contingent consideration obligation of $9.4 million at acquisition. In July 2011, the building’s sole tenant renewed its lease through August 2023 on the entire building with the exception of two floors. As a result, the Company issued 544,673 Operating Partnership units to satisfy a portion of its contingent consideration obligation. The Company recognized a $1.5 million gain associated with the issuance of the additional units, which represented the difference between the contractual value of the units and the fair value of the units at the date of issuance. At September 30, 2011, the remaining contingent consideration obligation was $0.7 million, which may result in the issuance of additional units dependent upon the leasing of any of the vacant space.

 

6


Table of Contents

FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Description of Business
First Potomac Realty Trust (the “Company”) is a leader in the ownership, management, development and redevelopment of office and industrial properties in the greater Washington, D.C. region. The Company separates its properties into four distinct segments, which it refers to as the Maryland, Washington, D.C., Northern Virginia and Southern Virginia reporting segments. The Company strategically focuses on acquiring and redeveloping properties that it believes can benefit from its intensive property management and seeks to reposition these properties to increase their profitability and value. The Company’s portfolio contains a mix of single-tenant and multi-tenant office and industrial properties as well as business parks. Office properties are single-story and multi-story buildings that are used primarily for office use; business parks contain buildings with office features combined with some industrial property space; and industrial properties generally are used as warehouse, distribution or manufacturing facilities.
References in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements to “we,” “our” or “First Potomac,” refer to the Company and its subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis, unless the context indicates otherwise.
The Company conducts its business through First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership, the Company’s operating partnership (the “Operating Partnership”). The Company is the sole general partner of, and, as of September 30, 2011, owned a 94.5% interest in, the Operating Partnership. The remaining interests in the Operating Partnership, which are presented as noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, are limited partnership interests, some of which are owned by several of the Company’s executive officers and trustees who contributed properties and other assets to the Company upon its formation, and other unrelated parties.
At September 30, 2011, the Company wholly-owned or had a controlling interest in properties totaling 13.9 million square feet and had a noncontrolling ownership interest in properties totaling an additional 0.5 million square feet through four unconsolidated joint ventures. The Company also owned land that can accommodate approximately 2.4 million square feet of additional development. The Company derives substantially all of its revenue from leases of space within its properties. As of September 30, 2011, the Company’s largest tenant was the U.S. Government, which along with government contractors, accounted for over 20% of the Company’s total annualized rental revenue. The U.S Government also accounted for approximately 30% of the Company’s outstanding accounts receivables at September 30, 2011. The Company operates so as to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes.
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Principles of Consolidation
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, the subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership in which it has a controlling interest and First Potomac Management LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary that manages the majority of the Company’s properties. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company has condensed or omitted certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company believes the disclosures made are adequate to prevent the information presented from being misleading. However, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2010, included in the Company’s current report on Form 8-K dated September 29, 2011 and as updated from time to time in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In the Company’s opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of September 30, 2011, the results of its operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and its cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year performance due, in part, to the timing of transactions and the impact of acquisitions and dispositions throughout the year.

 

7


Table of Contents

(b) Use of Estimates
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management of the Company to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Estimates include the amount of accounts receivable that may be uncollectible; recoverability of notes receivable, future cash flows, discount and capitalization rate assumptions used to fair value acquired properties and to test impairment of certain long-lived assets and goodwill; derivative valuations; market lease rates, lease-up periods, leasing and tenant improvement costs used to fair value intangible assets acquired and probability weighted cash flow analysis used to fair value contingent liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(c) Rental Property
Rental property is carried at initial cost less accumulated depreciation and, when appropriate, impairment losses. Improvements and replacements are capitalized at cost when they extend the useful life, increase capacity or improve the efficiency of the asset. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense when incurred. Depreciation and amortization are recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives of the Company’s assets, by class, are as follows:
     
Buildings
  39 years 
Building improvements
  5 to 20 years 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
  5 to 15 years 
Tenant improvements
  Shorter of the useful lives of the assets or the terms of the related leases
Lease related intangible assets
  Shorter of the term of related lease or the period the tenant occupies the space
The Company regularly reviews market conditions for possible impairment of a property’s carrying value. When circumstances such as adverse market conditions, changes in management’s intended holding period or potential sale to a third party indicate a possible impairment of the fair value of a property, an impairment analysis is performed. The Company assesses potential impairments based on an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest charges) expected to result from the property’s use and eventual disposition. This estimate is based on projections of future revenues, expenses, capital improvement costs, expected holding periods and capitalization rates. These cash flows consider factors such as expected market trends and leasing prospects, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If impairment exists due to the inability to recover the carrying value of a real estate investment based on forecasted undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property. The Company is required to make estimates as to whether there are impairments in the carrying values of its investments in real estate. Further, the Company will record an impairment loss if it expects to dispose of a property, in the near term, at a price below carrying value. In such an event, the Company will record an impairment loss based on the difference between a property’s carrying value and its projected sales price less any estimated costs to sell.
The Company will classify a building as held-for-sale in the period in which it has made the decision to dispose of the building, the Company’s Board of Trustees or a designated delegate has approved the sale, a binding agreement to purchase the property has been signed under which the buyer has committed a significant amount of nonrefundable cash and no significant financing contingencies exist that could cause the transaction not to be completed in a timely manner. The Company will classify any impairment loss, together with the building’s operating results, as discontinued operations in its consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented and classify the assets and related liabilities as held-for-sale in its consolidated balance sheets in the period the sale criteria are met. Interest expense is reclassified to discontinued operations only to the extent the held-for-sale property is secured by specific mortgage debt and the mortgage debt will not be assigned to another property owned by the Company after the disposition.
The Company recognizes the fair value, if sufficient information exists to reasonably estimate the fair value, of any liability for conditional asset retirement obligations when incurred, which is generally upon acquisition, construction, development or redevelopment and/or through the normal operation of the asset.

 

8


Table of Contents

The Company capitalizes interest costs incurred on qualifying expenditures for real estate assets under development or redevelopment while being readied for their intended use in accordance with accounting requirements regarding capitalization of interest. The Company will capitalize interest when qualifying expenditures for the asset have been made, activities necessary to get the asset ready for its intended use are in progress and interest costs are being incurred. Capitalized interest also includes interest associated with expenditures incurred to acquire developable land while development activities are in progress and the direct compensation costs of the Company’s construction personnel who manage the development and redevelopment projects, but only to the extent the employee’s time can be allocated to a project. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, capitalized compensation costs were immaterial. Capitalization of interest will end when the asset is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, but no later than one year from completion of major construction activity, if the property is not occupied. Capitalized interest is depreciated over the useful life of the underlying assets, commencing when those assets are placed into service.
(d) Notes Receivable
The Company lends money to the owners of real estate properties, which are collateralized by a direct or indirect interest in the real estate property. The Company records these investments as “Notes receivable, net” in its consolidated balance sheets. The investments are recorded net of any discount or issuance costs, which are amortized over the life of the respective note receivable using the effective interest method. The Company records interest earned from notes receivable and amortization of any discount or issuance costs within “Interest and other income” in its consolidated statements of operations.
The Company will establish a provision for anticipated credit losses associated with its notes receivables and debt investments when it anticipates that it may be unable to collect any contractually due amounts. This determination is based on upon such factors as delinquencies, loss experience, collateral quality and current economic or borrower conditions. Estimated losses are recorded as a charge to earnings to establish an allowance for credit losses that the Company estimates to be adequate based on these factors. The Company has not recorded any losses associated with its notes receivable during 2011 and 2010.
(e) Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
(f) Application of New Accounting Standards
New guidance was issued that allows only two options for presenting the components of net income and other comprehensive income: (1) in a single continuous financial statement, statement of comprehensive income or (2) in two separate but consecutive financial statements, consisting of an income statement followed by a separate statement of other comprehensive income. Also, items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income must be presented on the face of the consolidated financial statements. The guidance requires retrospective application, and it is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company believes the adoption of this update will change the order in which certain consolidated financial statements are presented and provide additional detail on those consolidated financial statements when applicable, but will not have any other impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2011, new accounting guidance was issued regarding the testing of potential goodwill impairment, which permits a company to make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impairment test. If a company can support the conclusion that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, it would not need to perform the two-step impairment test for that reporting unit. Goodwill must be tested for impairment at least annually, and prior to the new guidance, a two-step test was required to assess goodwill for impairment. The required disclosure is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe the implementation of this standard will have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.
(3) Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings or loss per share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing net income or loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed after adjusting the basic EPS computation for the effect of dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period, which include stock options, non-vested shares, preferred shares and Exchangeable Senior Notes. The Company applies the two-class method for determining EPS as its outstanding unvested shares with non-forfeitable dividend rights are considered participating securities. The Company’s excess of distributions over earnings related to participating securities are shown as a reduction in total earnings attributable to common shareholders in the Company’s computation of EPS.

 

9


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the computation of the Company’s basic and diluted earnings per share (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:
                               
(Loss) income from continuing operations
  $ (3,712 )   $ 218     $ (5,980 )   $ (2,254 )
Loss from discontinued operations
          (3,153 )     (873 )     (2,855 )
 
                       
Net loss
    (3,712 )     (2,935 )     (6,853 )     (5,109 )
Less: Net loss (income) from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests
    265       (4 )     487       48  
Less: Net loss (income) from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests
          59       (18 )     55  
 
                       
Net loss attributable to First Potomac Realty Trust
    (3,447 )     (2,880 )     (6,384 )     (5,006 )
 
Less: Dividends on preferred shares
    (2,228 )           (6,239 )      
 
                       
 
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
    (5,675 )     (2,880 )     (12,623 )     (5,006 )
 
Less: Allocation to participating securities
    (150 )     (151 )     (442 )     (455 )
 
                       
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
  $ (5,825 )   $ (3,031 )   $ (13,065 )   $ (5,461 )
 
                       
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share:
                               
Weighted average shares outstanding — basic and diluted
    49,308       37,269       49,275       34,804  
 
                               
Basic and diluted earnings per share:
                               
(Loss) income from continuing operations
  $ (0.12 )   $     $ (0.25 )   $ (0.08 )
Loss from discontinued operations
          (0.08 )     (0.02 )     (0.08 )
 
                       
Net loss
  $ (0.12 )   $ (0.08 )   $ (0.27 )   $ (0.16 )
 
                       
In accordance with accounting requirements regarding earnings per share, the Company did not include the following potential common shares in its calculation of diluted earnings per share as they are anti-dilutive (amounts in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Stock option awards
    903       832       907       843  
Non-vested share awards
    388       310       406       327  
Conversion of Exchangeable Senior Notes(1)
    854       854       854       1,180  
Series A Preferred Shares(2)
    8,303             7,636        
 
                       
 
    10,448       1,996       9,803       2,350  
 
                       
(1)  
At September 30, 2011 and 2010, each $1,000 principal amount of the Exchangeable Senior Notes was convertible into 28.039 shares.
 
(2)  
The Company’s Series A Preferred Shares are only convertible into the Company’s common shares upon certain changes of control of the Company.

 

10


Table of Contents

(4) Rental Property
Rental property represents property, net of accumulated depreciation, and developable land that are wholly owned or owned by an entity in which the Company has a controlling interest. All of the Company’s rental properties are located within the greater Washington, D.C. region. Rental property consists of the following (amounts in thousands):
                 
    September 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
Land and land improvements
  $ 385,306     $ 315,229  
Buildings and improvements
    1,045,358       930,077  
Construction in process
    63,331       41,685  
Tenant improvements
    108,361       92,002  
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
    5,381       9,894  
 
           
 
    1,607,737       1,388,887  
Less: accumulated depreciation
    (179,949 )     (170,990 )
 
           
 
  $ 1,427,788     $ 1,217,897  
 
           
(a) Development and Redevelopment Activity
The Company constructs office buildings, business parks and/or industrial buildings on a build-to-suit basis or with the intent to lease upon completion of construction. Also, the Company owns developable land that can accommodate 2.4 million square feet of additional building space. Below is a summary of the approximate building square footage that can be developed on the Company’s developable land and the Company’s current development and redevelopment activity (amounts in thousands):
                                         
            Square Feet     Cost to Date of     Square Feet     Cost to Date of  
Reporting   Developable     Under     Development     Under     Redevelopment  
Segment   Square Feet     Development     Activities     Redevelopment     Activities  
Maryland
    250           $           $  
Northern Virginia
    568                   15        
Southern Virginia
    841       166       477              
Washington, D.C.
    742                   135       1,225  
 
                             
 
                                       
 
    2,401       166     $ 477       150     $ 1,225  
 
                             
The Company anticipates the majority of the development and redevelopment efforts on these projects will continue throughout the remainder of 2011 and into 2012.
At September 30, 2011, the Company had completed development and redevelopment activities that have yet to be placed in service on 243 thousand square feet, at a cost of $16.1 million, in its Northern Virginia reporting segment and 39 thousand square feet, at a cost of $1.2 million, in its Southern Virginia reporting segment. The majority of the costs on the construction projects to be placed in service relate to redevelopment activities at Three Flint Hill in the Company’s Northern Virginia reporting segment, which were completed in the third quarter of 2011 at a cost of $11.0 million. The Company will place completed construction activities in service upon the shorter of a tenant taking occupancy or twelve months from substantial completion.

 

11


Table of Contents

(b) Acquisitions
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company acquired the following properties, which are included in its condensed consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition (dollars in thousands):
                             
                        Aggregate  
        Acquisition   Property   Square     Purchase  
    Location   Date   Type   Feet     Price  
 
                           
Greenbrier Towers
  Southern Virginia   July 19   Office     171,894     $ 16,641  
 
                           
1005 First Street, NE
  Washington, D.C.   August 4   Office     30,414       45,240 (1)
 
                       
 
                           
 
                202,308     $ 61,881  
 
                       
(1)  
Includes a deferred purchase price liability of $8.6 million.
On August 4, 2011, the Company formed a joint venture with an affiliate of Perseus Realty, LLC to acquire 1005 First Street, NE in Washington, D.C. for $46.8 million, of which, $38.4 million was paid at closing and the remaining $8.4 million will be paid in August 2013. The Company recorded the $8.4 million deferred purchase price obligation at its fair value at the time of acquisition within “Accounts payable and other liabilities” in its consolidated balance sheets. The Company determined the fair value of the deferred purchase price by calculating the present value of the obligation that is due in 2013 using a discount rate for comparable transactions. The site is currently occupied by the Greyhound Lines, Inc., “Greyhound”, which leased back the site under a ten-year lease agreement with a termination option, at no penalty, after the second year. Greyhound has announced that it intends to relocate its operations to nearby Union Station, at which point the joint venture anticipates developing the 1.6 acre site, which can accommodate development of up to approximately 712,000 square feet of office space. The development of the site will be managed by an affiliate of Perseus Realty, LLC. The property is located in a former industrial area of Washington, D.C. where contaminated soil and/or groundwater are commonly encountered due to past usage. The Company solicited a third party to quantify the remediation needed at the property to remove any contaminates. The third party determined the approximate cost of the site remediation to be $2.4 million, which the Company recorded as an addition to “Accounts payable and other liabilities” on its consolidated balance sheets. The Company anticipates owning 97% of the joint venture when the joint venture is fully capitalized. At acquisition, the fair value of the noncontrolling interest in the Greyhound property was approximately $1.2 million, which equates to the Company’s joint venture partner’s proportionate share of the purchase price.
   
The fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired in the third quarter of 2011 are as follows (amounts in thousands):
         
Land
  $ 46,497  
Acquired tenant improvements
    1,325  
Building and improvements
    13,264  
In-place leases
    2,249  
Acquired leasing commissions
    351  
Marketing and legal intangible
    188  
Above-market leases acquired
    448  
 
     
Total assets acquired
    64,322  
Below-market leases assumed
    (91 )
Environmental remediation obligation
    (2,350 )
Deferred purchase price obligation
    (6,840 )
 
     
Net assets acquired
  $ 55,041  
 
     
The fair values for the assets and liabilities acquired in 2011 are preliminary as the Company continues to finalize their acquisition date fair value determination.

 

12


Table of Contents

At September 30, 2011, the weighted average amortization period of the Company’s consolidated intangible assets acquired in the third quarter of 2011 was 3.3 years. At September 30, 2011, the intangible assets acquired during the third quarter are comprised of the following categories with their respective weighted average amortization periods: acquired tenant improvements 3.6 years; in-place leases 3.1 years; acquired leasing commissions 3.6 years; marketing and legal expenses 3.4 years; above market leases 3.4 years; and below-market leases 4.4 years.
In March 2011, the Company acquired 840 First Street, NE, and, upon completion of the final tax return by the prior ownership entity during the third quarter, the Company recognized a deferred tax liability associated with the carryover basis of the property. As a result, the Company recognized goodwill of approximately $4.8 million on its consolidated balance sheet representing the residual difference between the consideration transferred and the acquisition date fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including deferred taxes representing the difference between the fair value at acquisition and the carryover basis used for income tax purposes.
(5) Notes Receivable
Below is a summary of the Company’s notes receivable as of September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
                                         
            Balance At September 30, 2011              
            Unamortized                      
            Origination             Interest        
Issued   Face Amount     Costs     Balance     Rate     Secured Property  
 
December 2010
  $ 25,000     $ (220 )   $ 24,780       12.5 %   950 F Street, NW
April 2011
    30,000       (136 )     29,864       9.0 %   America’s Square
 
                                 
 
  $ 55,000     $ (356 )   $ 54,644                  
 
                                 
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded interest income of $1.5 million and $3.6 million, respectively, related to its notes receivable.
(6) Investment in Affiliates
The Company owns an interest in several properties for which it does not control the activities that are most significant to the operations of the properties. As a result, the assets, liabilities and operating results of these noncontrolled properties are not consolidated within the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company’s investment in these properties is recorded as “Investment in affiliates” in its consolidated balance sheets.
Since January 1, 2010, the Company has had a 25% noncontrolling interest in the two separate unconsolidated joint ventures that own RiversPark I and II. During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company entered into two separate joint ventures, in which it had a 50% noncontrolling interest, to own 1750 H Street, NW and Aviation Business Park.
The net assets of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures consisted of the following (amounts in thousands):
                 
    September 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
Assets:
               
Rental property, net
  $ 103,415     $ 104,559  
Cash and cash equivalents
    2,919       1,706  
Other assets
    9,838       11,442  
 
           
Total assets
    116,172       117,707  
 
           
Liabilities:
               
Mortgage loans(1)
    59,111       59,914  
Other liabilities
    2,287       4,316  
 
           
Total liabilities
    61,398       64,230  
 
           
 
               
Net assets
  $ 54,774     $ 53,477  
 
           
(1)  
Of the total mortgage debt that encumbers the Company’s unconsolidated properties, $7.0 million is recourse to the Company.

 

13


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the results of operations of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures. The Company’s share of earnings or losses related to its unconsolidated joint ventures is recorded in its consolidated statements of operations as “Equity in losses of affiliates” (amounts in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
 
                               
Total revenues
  $ 2,896     $ 1,158     $ 8,860     $ 3,459  
Total operating expenses
    (995 )     (237 )     (2,917 )     (887 )
 
                       
Net operating income
    1,901       921       5,943       2,572  
Depreciation and amortization
    (1,274 )     (751 )     (3,835 )     (1,705 )
Other expenses, net
    (854 )     (471 )     (2,429 )     (1,402 )
 
                       
Net loss
  $ (227 )   $ (301 )   $ (321 )   $ (535 )
 
                       
(7) Discontinued Operations
The following table is a summary of property dispositions whose operating results are reflected as discontinued operations in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations:
                     
    Reporting   Disposition       Square  
    Segment   Date   Property Type   Feet  
 
                   
Aquia Commerce Center I & II
  Northern Virginia   6/22/2011   Office     64,488  
Gateway West
  Maryland   5/27/2011   Office     111,481  
Old Courthouse Square
  Maryland   2/18/2011   Retail     201,208  
7561 Lindbergh Drive
  Maryland   6/16/2010   Industrial     36,000  
Deer Park
  Maryland   4/23/2010   Business Park     171,125  
 
                 
 
 
                584,302  
 
                 
The Company has had, and will have, no continuing involvement with any of its disposed properties subsequent to their disposal. The operations of the disposed properties were not subject to any income taxes. The Company did not dispose of or enter into any binding agreements to sell any other properties during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
The following table summarizes the components of net loss from discontinued operations (amounts in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Revenues
  $     $ 957     $ 1,055     $ 3,146  
Net loss, before gain on sale or taxes
          (3,153 )     (2,827 )     (3,412 )
Gain on sale of real estate properties
                1,954       557  

 

14


Table of Contents

(8) Debt
The Company’s borrowings consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Mortgage loans, effective interest rates ranging from 4.40% to 7.29%, maturing at various dates through June 2021
  $ 420,089     $ 319,096  
Exchangeable senior notes, net of discounts, effective interest rate of 5.84%, maturing December 2011(1)
    30,357       29,936  
Series A senior notes, effective interest rate of 6.41%, maturing June 2013
    37,500       37,500  
Series B senior notes, effective interest rate of 6.55%, maturing June 2016
    37,500       37,500  
Secured term loan, effective interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.50%, maturing January 2014(2)(3)
    30,000       40,000  
Secured term loan, effective interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.50%, matured August 2011(3)(4)
          20,000  
Secured term loan, effective interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.50%, matured August 2011(3)(5)
          50,000  
Unsecured term loan, effective interest rates ranging from LIBOR plus 2.15% to LIBOR plus 2.30%, with staggered maturity dates ranging from July 2016 to July 2018(3)(5)
    175,000        
Unsecured revolving credit facility, effective interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.50%, maturing January 2015(3)(5)(6)
    142,000       191,000  
 
           
 
  $ 872,446     $ 725,032  
 
           
(1)  
The principal balance of the Exchangeable Senior Notes was $30.4 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
 
(2)  
On January 1, 2011, the loan’s applicable interest rate increased to LIBOR plus 3.50% and will continue to increase by 100 basis points every year, to a maximum of 550 basis points.
 
(3)  
At September 30, 2011, LIBOR was 0.24%.
 
(4)  
On August 11, 2011, the Company repaid its $20.0 million secured term loan with borrowings under its unsecured revolving credit facility.
 
(5)  
On July 18, 2011, the Company repaid its $50.0 million secured term loan and paid down $117.0 million of the outstanding balance on its unsecured revolving credit facility with proceeds from the issuance of a three-tranche $175.0 million unsecured term loan.
 
(6)  
The unsecured revolving credit facility matures in January 2014 with a one-year extension at the Company’s option, which it intends to exercise.
(a) Mortgage Loans
The following table provides a summary of the Company’s mortgage debt at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
                                         
            Effective                    
    Contractual     Interest     Maturity     September 30,     December 31,  
Encumbered Property   Interest Rate     Rate     Date     2011     2010  
Indian Creek Court (1)
    7.80 %     5.90 %   January 2011   $     $ 11,982  
403/405 Glenn Drive (2)
    7.60 %     5.50 %   July 2011           7,960  
4612 Navistar Drive (2)
    7.48 %     5.20 %   July 2011           12,189  
Campus at Metro Park (3)
    7.11 %     5.25 %   February 2012     21,917       22,556  
One Fair Oaks
    6.31 %     6.72 %   June 2012     52,706        
1434 Crossways Blvd Building II
    7.05 %     5.38 %   August 2012     9,196       9,484  
Crossways Commerce Center
    6.70 %     6.70 %   October 2012     23,839       24,179  
Newington Business Park Center
    6.70 %     6.70 %   October 2012     15,037       15,252  
Prosperity Business Center
    6.25 %     5.75 %   January 2013     3,414       3,502  
Aquia Commerce Center I(4)
    7.28 %     7.28 %   February 2013           353  
Cedar Hill
    6.00 %     6.58 %   February 2013     15,944        
Merrill Lynch Building
    6.00 %     7.29 %   February 2013     13,639        
1434 Crossways Blvd Building I
    6.25 %     5.38 %   March 2013     8,014       8,225  
Linden Business Center
    6.01 %     5.58 %   October 2013     6,959       7,080  
840 First Street, NE
    5.18 %     6.05 %   October 2013     55,999        
Owings Mills Business Center
    5.85 %     5.75 %   March 2014     5,367       5,448  
Annapolis Commerce Park East
    5.74 %     6.25 %   June 2014     8,394       8,491  
Cloverleaf Center
    6.75 %     6.75 %   October 2014     16,984       17,204  
Plaza 500, Van Buren Business Park, Rumsey Center, Snowden Center, Greenbrier Technology Center II, Norfolk Business Center, Northridge I & II and 15395 John Marshall Highway
    5.19 %     5.19 %   August 2015     98,056       99,151  

 

15


Table of Contents

                                         
            Effective                    
    Contractual     Interest     Maturity     September 30,     December 31,  
Encumbered Property   Interest Rate     Rate     Date     2011     2010  
Hanover Business Center:
                                       
Building D
    8.88 %     6.63 %   August 2015     551       642  
Building C
    7.88 %     6.63 %   December 2017     951       1,041  
Chesterfield Business Center:
                                       
Buildings C,D,G and H
    8.50 %     6.63 %   August 2015     1,449       1,681  
Buildings A,B,E and F
    7.45 %     6.63 %   June 2021     2,277       2,398  
7458 Candlewood Road — Note 1
    4.67 %     6.04 %   January 2016     4,722       4,761  
7458 Candlewood Road — Note 2
    6.57 %     6.30 %   January 2016     9,779       9,938  
Gateway Centre, Building I
    7.35 %     5.88 %   November 2016     1,060       1,189  
500 First Street, NW
    5.72 %     5.79 %   July 2020     38,409       38,793  
Battlefield Corporate Center
    4.26 %     4.40 %   November 2020     4,184       4,289  
Airpark Business Center
    7.45 %     6.63 %   June 2021     1,242       1,308  
 
                                   
Total Mortgage Debt
            5.98 %(5)           $ 420,089     $ 319,096  
 
                                   
(1)  
The loan was repaid in January 2011 with available cash.
 
(2)  
The loan was repaid in July 2011 with borrowings under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility.
 
(3)  
The maturity date presented for the loan represents the anticipated repayment date of the loan, after which date the interest rate on the loan will increase to a predetermined amount identified in the debt agreement. The effective interest rate was calculated based on the anticipated period the debt is expected to be outstanding.
 
(4)  
The loan was repaid in April 2011 with available cash.
 
(5)  
Weighted average interest rate on total mortgage debt.
(b) Unsecured Term Loan
On July 18, 2011, the Company entered into a three-tranche $175.0 million unsecured term loan. The unsecured term loan’s three tranches have maturity dates staggered in one-year intervals. Tranche A has an outstanding balance of $60.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 215 basis points and matures on July 18, 2016. Tranche B has an outstanding balance of $60.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 225 basis points and matures on July 18, 2017. Tranche C has an outstanding balance of $55.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 230 basis points and matures on July 18, 2018. The term loan agreement contains various restrictive covenants substantially similar to those contained in the Company’s revolving credit facility, including with respect to liens, indebtedness, investments, distributions, mergers and asset sales. In addition, the agreement requires that the Company satisfy certain financial covenants that are also substantially similar to those contained in the Company’s revolving credit facility. The agreement also includes customary events of default, the occurrence of which, following any applicable cure period, would permit the lenders to, among other things, declare the principal, accrued interest and other obligations of the Company under the agreement to be immediately due and payable. The Company used the funds to pay down $117.0 million of the outstanding balance on its unsecured revolving credit facility, to repay its $50.0 million senior secured term loan and for other general corporate purposes.
(c) Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company repaid $117.0 million of the outstanding balance of its unsecured revolving credit facility with proceeds from the issuance of a $175.0 million unsecured term loan. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company borrowed $95.0 million on its unsecured revolving credit facility to fund the acquisition of 1005 First Street, NE, to repay the outstanding balance on two mortgage loans, to repay its $20.0 million secured term loan and for general corporate purposes. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company’s weighted average borrowings outstanding on its unsecured revolving credit facility were $133.9 million and $133.3 million, respectively, with a weighted average interest rate of 2.7% and 3.0%, respectively, compared with weighted average borrowings of $125.7 million and $120.5 million with a weighted average interest rate of 3.3% and 3.6% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. At September 30, 2011, outstanding borrowings under the unsecured revolving credit facility were $142.0 million. The Company is required to pay an annual commitment fee of 0.25% based on the amount of unused capacity under the unsecured revolving credit facility, which was $113.0 million at September 30, 2011.
(d) Interest Rate Swap Agreements
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company entered into five interest rate swap agreements that fixed LIBOR on $150.0 million of its variable rate debt. As of September 30, 2011, the Company has hedged $200.0 million of its variable rate debt through six interest rate swap agreements. See footnote 9, Derivative Instruments and Comprehensive Loss for more information about the Company’s interest rate swap agreements.

 

16


Table of Contents

(e) Debt Covenants
Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries are borrowers on mortgage loans, the terms of which prohibit certain direct or indirect transfers of ownership interests in the borrower subsidiary (a “Prohibited Transfer”). Under the terms of the mortgage loan documents, a lender could assert that a Prohibited Transfer includes the trading of the Company’s common shares on the NYSE, the issuance of common shares by the Company, or the issuance of units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. As of September 30, 2011, the Company believes that there were six mortgage loans with such Prohibited Transfer provisions, representing an aggregate principal amount outstanding of approximately $57.2 million, of which two mortgages totaling $38.9 million are scheduled to mature in 2012. Two of these mortgage loans were entered into prior to the Company’s initial public offering (“IPO”) in 2003 and four were assumed subsequent to its IPO. In each instance, the Company received the consent of the mortgage lender to consummate its IPO (for the two pre-IPO loans) or to acquire the property or the ownership interests of the borrower (for the post-IPO loans), including the assumption by its subsidiary of the mortgage loan. Generally, the underlying mortgage documents, previously applicable to a privately held owner, were not changed at the time of the IPO or the later loan assumptions, although the Company believes that each of the lenders or servicers was aware that the borrower’s ultimate parent was or would become a publicly traded company. Subsequent to the IPO and the assumption of these additional mortgage loans, the Company has issued new common shares and shares of the Company have been transferred on the New York Stock Exchange. Similarly, the Operating Partnership has issued units of limited partnership interest. To date, no lender or servicer has asserted that a Prohibited Transfer has occurred as a result of any such transfer of shares or units of limited partnership interest. If a lender were to be successful in any such action, the Company could be required to immediately repay or refinance the amounts outstanding, or the lender may be able to foreclose on the property securing the loan or take other adverse actions. In addition, in certain cases a Prohibited Transfer could result in the loan becoming fully recourse to the Company or its Operating Partnership. In addition, if a violation of a Prohibited Transfer provision were to occur that would permit the Company’s mortgage lenders to accelerate the indebtedness owed to them, it could result in an event of default under the Company’s Series A and Series B Senior Notes, its unsecured revolving credit facility, its unsecured term loan, its secured term loan and its Exchangeable Senior Notes.
At September 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants associated with its debt instruments.
(9) Income Taxes
The Company owns properties located in Washington, D.C. that are subject to local income based franchise taxes. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recognized a benefit for income taxes of $0.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively, related to franchise taxes levied by the city of Washington, D.C. at an effective rate of 9.975%. The Company acquired its first property in Washington, D.C. that was subject to local franchise taxes in the fourth quarter of 2010 and was not subject to any franchise taxes during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets only to the extent that it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will be realized based on consideration of available evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income and tax planning strategies. The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are primarily associated with differences in the GAAP and tax basis of its real estate assets arising from acquisition costs, intangible assets and deferred market rent assets and liabilities that are associated with properties located in Washington, D.C. and recorded in its consolidated balance sheets. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company recorded its deferred tax assets within “Prepaid expenses and other assets” and recorded its deferred tax liabilities within “Accounts payable and other liabilities” in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
The Company has not recorded a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets as it determined that is more likely than not that future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets. The Company has not recognized any deferred tax assets or liabilities as a result of uncertain tax positions and has no material net operating loss, capital loss or alternative minimum tax carryovers. There was no (benefit) provision for income taxes associated with the Company’s discontinued operations for any period presented. At September 30, 2011, the Company had deferred tax assets totaling $1.3 million and deferred tax liabilities totaling $5.0 million.

 

17


Table of Contents

(10) Derivative Instruments and Comprehensive Loss
The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from business operations and economic factors. The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities in which its future exposure to interest rate fluctuations is unknown. The objective in the use of an interest rate derivative is to add stability to interest expenses and manage exposure to interest rate changes. No hedging activity can completely insulate the Company from the risks associated with changes in interest rates. Moreover, interest rate hedging could fail to protect the Company or adversely affect it because, among other things:
   
available interest rate hedging may not correspond directly with the interest rate risk for which the Company seeks protection;
   
the duration of the hedge may not match the duration of the related liability;
   
the party owing money in the hedging transaction may default on its obligation to pay; and
   
the credit quality of the party owing money on the hedge may be downgraded to such an extent that it impairs the Company’s ability to sell or assign its side of the hedging transaction.
The Company enters into interest rate swap agreements to hedge its exposure on its variable rate debt against fluctuations in prevailing interest rates. The interest rate swap agreements fix LIBOR to a specified interest rate; however, the swap agreements do not affect the contractual spreads associated with each variable debt instrument’s applicable interest rate. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company entered into five interest rate swap agreements that fixed LIBOR on $150.0 million of its variable rate debt. At September 30, 2011, the Company has hedged $200.0 million of its variable rate debt through six interest rate swap agreements.
The table below summarizes the Company’s interest rate swap agreements as of September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
                                 
                    Interest Rate        
                    Contractual     Fixed LIBOR  
Effective Date   Maturity Date     Amount     Component     Interest Rate  
January 2011(1)
  January 2014   $ 50,000     LIBOR     1.474 %
July 2011
  July 2016     35,000     LIBOR     1.754 %
July 2011
  July 2016     25,000     LIBOR     1.7625 %
July 2011
  July 2017     30,000     LIBOR     2.093 %
July 2011
  July 2017     30,000     LIBOR     2.093 %
September 2011
  July 2018     30,000     LIBOR     1.660 %
 
                             
 
          $ 200,000                  
 
                             
(1)  
The Company entered into this interest rate swap agreement in July 2010.
The Company’s interest rate swap agreements are designated as effective cash flow hedges and the Company records any unrealized gains associated with the change in fair value of the swap agreements within equity and “Prepaid expenses and other assets” and any unrealized losses within equity and “Accounts payable and other liabilities.” The Company records its proportionate share of unrealized gains or losses on its cash flow hedges associated with its unconsolidated joint ventures within equity and “Investment in affiliates.”
In September 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that fixed the $28.0 million variable rate mortgage encumbering RiversPark I and II at 5.97%. The mortgage has a contractual interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.50%. On March 17, 2009 and January 1, 2010, the Company deconsolidated the joint ventures that own RiversPark II and RiversPark I, respectively. As a result, the $28.0 million mortgage loan and related interest rate swap for RiversPark I and II are not consolidated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The interest rate swap agreement matured in September 2011.
Total comprehensive loss is summarized as follows (amounts in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Net loss
  $ (3,712 )   $ (2,935 )   $ (6,853 )   $ (5,109 )
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments
    (4,817 )     (518 )     (5,100 )     605  
 
                       
Total comprehensive loss
    (8,529 )     (3,453 )     (11,953 )     (4,504 )
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
    494       65       716       89  
 
                       
Comprehensive loss attributable to First Potomac Realty Trust
  $ (8,035 )   $ (3,388 )   $ (11,237 )   $ (4,415 )
 
                       

 

18


Table of Contents

(11) Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted accounting provisions that outline a valuation framework and create a fair value hierarchy, which distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and a reporting entity’s own assumptions about market data (unobservable inputs). The new disclosures increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related disclosures. Fair value is identified, under the standard, as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between willing third parties at the measurement date (an exit price). In accordance with GAAP, certain assets and liabilities must be measured at fair value, and the Company provides the necessary disclosures that are required for items measured at fair value as outlined in the accounting requirements regarding fair value.
Financial assets and liabilities, as well as those non-financial assets and liabilities requiring fair value measurement, are measured using inputs from three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
The three levels are as follows:
Level 1 — Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market is defined as a market in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2 — Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active (markets with few transactions), inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs, only used to the extent that observable inputs are not available, reflect the Company’s assumptions about the pricing of an asset or liability.
In accordance with accounting provisions and the fair value hierarchy described above, the following table shows the fair value of the Company’s consolidated assets and liabilities that are measured on a non-recurring and recurring basis as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (amounts in thousands):
                                 
    Balance at                    
    September 30, 2011     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
Non-recurring Measurement:
                               
Impaired real estate asset
  $ 5,750     $     $     $ 5,750  
 
                               
Recurring Measurements:
                               
Derivative instrument-swap instruments
  $ 5,660     $     $ 5,660     $  
Contingent consideration related to acquisition of:
                               
Ashburn Center
    1,398                   1,398  
840 First Street, NE
    745                   745  
                                 
    Balance at                    
    December 31, 2010     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
Non-recurring Measurement:
                               
Impaired real estate assets
  $ 10,950     $     $ 10,950     $  
 
                               
Recurring Measurements:
                               
Derivative instrument-swap instrument
    396             396        
Contingent consideration related to acquisition of:
                               
Ashburn Center
    1,398                   1,398  

 

19


Table of Contents

Impairment of Real Estate Assets
The Company regularly reviews market conditions for possible impairment of a property’s carrying value. When circumstances such as adverse market conditions, changes in management’s intended holding period or potential sale to a third party indicate a possible impairment of a property, an impairment analysis is performed.
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company incurred a $3.1 million impairment charge on its Airpark Place property located in its Maryland reporting segment. Due to the shortening of the anticipated holding period for this property, management has identified a triggering event for the evaluation of a possible impairment. The Company determined the fair value of the property through an assessment of market data and through an income approach based on discounted cash flows anticipated over a reduced holding period.
On December 29, 2010, the Company acquired 7458 Candlewood Road, which is located in the Company’s Maryland reporting segment. Due to the bankruptcy of an acquired tenant, the Company realized an impairment charge of $2.4 million to reflect the fair value of the intangible asset associated with the tenant’s lease, which was determined to have no value. The non-recoverable value of the intangible assets was based on, among other items, an analysis of current market rates, the present value of future cash flows that were discounted using capitalization rates, lease renewal probabilities, hypothetical leasing timeframes, historical leasing commissions, expected value of tenant improvements and recently executed leases.
In September 2010, the Company adjusted its anticipated holding period for its Old Courthouse Square property, which is located in the Company’s Maryland reporting segment. The Company entered into a non-binding contract to sell the asset in October 2010. As a result, the Company realized a $3.4 million impairment charge to reduce the property’s carrying value to reflect its fair value, less any potential selling costs. The property was sold on February 18, 2011 for net proceeds of $10.8 million. The Company determined the fair value of the property through an assessment of market data in working with a real estate broker on the transaction and based on the execution of a non-binding letter of intent. The fair value was further validated through an income approach based on discounted cash flows that reflected a reduced holding period.
The Company incurred impairment charges of $3.1 million and $5.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with $3.4 million and $4.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. The Company recorded the $3.1 million Airpark Place impairment charge described above within continuing operations on its consolidated statements of operations, the remaining impairment charges incurred during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 relate to properties that were subsequently disposed of and are recorded within discontinued operations on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
Interest Rate Derivatives
On January 18, 2011, the Company fixed LIBOR at 1.474% on $50.0 million of its variable rate debt through an interest rate swap agreement that matures on January 15, 2014. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company entered into five interest rate swap agreements that fixed LIBOR on $150.0 million of its variable rate debt with staggered maturities between July 2016 and 2018. The derivatives are fair valued based on prevailing market yield curves on the measurement date. Also, the Company evaluates counter-party risk in calculating the fair value of the interest rate swap derivative instruments. The Company’s interest rate swap derivatives are an effective cash flow hedge and any change in fair value is recorded in the Company’s equity section as “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.”
The Company uses a third party to assist with the valuation of its interest rate swap agreements. The third party takes a daily “snapshot” of the market to obtain close of business rates. The snapshot includes over 7,500 rates including LIBOR fixings, Eurodollar futures, swap rates, exchange rates, treasuries, etc. This market data is obtained via direct feeds from Bloomberg and Reuters and from Inter-Dealer Brokers. The selected rates are compared to their historical values. Any rate that has changed by more than normal mean and related standard deviation would be considered an outlier and flagged for further investigation. The rates are then compiled through a valuation process that generates daily valuations, which are used to value the Company’s interest rate swap agreements.

 

20


Table of Contents

A summary of the Company’s interest rate derivative liabilities which are included in “Accounts payable and other liabilities” in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, is as follows (amounts in thousands):
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2011     2010  
Beginning balance at January 1,
  $ 396     $ 1,741  
Deconsolidation (1)
          (396 )
Unrealized loss (gain)
    5,264       (541 )
 
           
Ending balance at September 30,
  $ 5,660     $ 804  
 
           
(1)  
On January 1, 2010, the Company deconsolidated RiversPark I and all its assets and liabilities, including its interest rate derivative liability, were removed from the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
Contingent Consideration
On March 25, 2011, the Company acquired 840 First Street, NE, in Washington, D.C. for an aggregate purchase price of $90.0 million, with up to $10.0 million of additional consideration payable in Operating Partnership units upon the terms of a lease renewal by the building’s sole tenant or the re-tenanting of the property through November 2013. Based on assessment of the probability of renewal and anticipated lease rates, the Company recorded a contingent consideration obligation of $9.4 million at acquisition. In July 2011, the building’s sole tenant renewed its lease through August 2023 on the entire building with the exception of two floors. As a result, the Company issued 544,673 Operating Partnership units to satisfy $7.1 million of its contingent consideration obligation. The Company recognized a $1.5 million gain associated with the issuance of the additional units, which represented the difference between the contractual value of the units and the fair value of the units at the date of issuance. At September 30, 2011, the remaining contingent consideration obligation was $0.7 million, which may result in the issuance of additional units dependent upon the leasing of any of the vacant space. The fair value of the contingent consideration obligation was determined based on several probability weighted discounted cash flow scenarios that projected stabilization being achieved at certain timeframes. The fair value was based, in part, on significant inputs, which are not observable in the market, thus representing a Level 3 measurement in accordance with the fair value hierarchy.
The Company has a contingent consideration obligation associated with the 2009 acquisition of Ashburn Center. As part of the acquisition price of Ashburn Center, the Company entered into a fee agreement with the seller under which the Company will be obligated to pay additional consideration upon the property achieving stabilization per specified terms of the agreement. The Company determines the fair value of the obligation through an income approach based on discounted cash flows that project stabilization being achieved within a certain timeframe. The more significant inputs associated with the fair value determination of the contingent consideration include estimates of capitalization rates, discount rates and various assumptions regarding the property’s operating performance and profitability.
The Company did not recognize any additional gains or losses associated with its contingent consideration for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 or the three months ended September 30, 2010. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company fully leased the Ashburn Center, which resulted in an increase in its potential obligation, and recorded a $0.7 million increase in its contingent consideration to reflect the increase in the Company’s potential obligation with a corresponding entry to “Contingent Consideration Related to Acquisition of Property” in its consolidated statements of operations. The Company has classified its contingent consideration liabilities within “Accounts payable and other liabilities” and any changes in its fair value subsequent to their acquisition date valuation are charged to earnings. There was no significant change in the fair value of the contingent consideration during the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
A summary of the Company’s consolidated contingent consideration obligations is as follows (amounts in thousands):
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2011     2010  
Beginning balance at January 1,
  $ 1,398     $ 688  
Change in fair value
    (1,487 )     710  
Additions to contingent consideration obligation
    9,356        
Satisfaction of contingent consideration obligation
    (7,124 )      
 
           
Ending balance at September 30,
  $ 2,143     $ 1,398  
 
           

 

21


Table of Contents

With the exception of its contingent consideration obligation, the Company did not re-measure or complete any transactions involving non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. Also, no transfers into and out of fair value measurements levels occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 or 2010.
Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, accounts payable and other liabilities, with the exception of any items listed above, approximate their fair values due to their short-term maturities. The Company uses third parties with mezzanine lending expertise to value its notes receivable based on comparable deals, market analysis and underlying asset operating results. The Company calculates the fair value of its debt instruments by discounting future contractual principal and interest payments using prevailing market rates for securities with similar terms and characteristics at the balance sheet date. The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s note receivables and debt instruments at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows (amounts in thousands):
                                 
    September 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    Carrying     Fair     Carrying     Fair  
    Value     Value     Value     Value  
Financial Assets:
                               
Notes receivable(1)
  $ 54,644     $ 55,000     $ 24,750     $ 24,750  
 
                       
 
                               
Financial Liabilities:
                               
Mortgage debt
  $ 420,089     $ 431,231     $ 319,096     $ 316,169  
Exchangeable senior notes(2)
    30,357       30,564       29,936       30,412  
Series A senior notes
    37,500       38,596       37,500       37,850  
Series B senior notes
    37,500       39,582       37,500       37,251  
Secured term loan
    30,000       29,998       110,000       109,976  
Unsecured term loan
    175,000       174,667              
Unsecured revolving credit facility
    142,000       141,831       191,000       191,073  
 
                       
Total
  $ 872,446     $ 886,469     $ 725,032     $ 722,731  
 
                       
(1)  
The face value of the Company’s notes receivable was $55.0 million at September 30, 2011 and $25.0 million at December 31, 2010.
 
(2)  
The face value of the notes was $30.4 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
(12) Equity
On August 12, 2011, the Company paid a dividend of $0.20 per share to common shareholders of record as of August 5, 2011 and paid a dividend of $0.484375 per share to preferred shareholders of record as of August 5, 2011. On October 25, 2011, the Company declared a dividend of $0.20 per common share, which is payable on November 11, 2011 to common shareholders of record as of November 4, 2011 and a dividend of $0.484375 per share on its Series A Preferred Shares, which is payable on November 15, 2011 to preferred shareholders of record as of November 4, 2011. Dividends on all non-vested share awards are recorded as a reduction of shareholders’ equity. For each dividend paid by the Company on its common stock, the Operating Partnership distributes an equivalent distribution on its Operating Partnership units.
On November 1, 2011, the Company began issuing shares of its common stock under its control equity offering program. During 2010, the Company issued 0.5 million common shares through its controlled equity program, which generated net proceeds of approximately $7.3 million.

 

22


Table of Contents

As a result of the redemption feature of the Operating Partnership units requiring delivery of registered shares of the Company, the noncontrolling interests associated with the Operating Partnerhsip are recorded outside of permanent equity. The Company’s equity and redeemable noncontrolling interests are as follows (amounts in thousands):
                                 
            Non-                
    First     redeemable             Redeemable  
    Potomac     noncontrolling             noncontrolling  
    Realty Trust     interests     Total Equity     interests  
Balance, December 31, 2010
  $ 614,983     $ 3,077     $ 618,060     $ 16,122  
Net (loss) income
    (6,391 )     7       (6,384 )     (476 )
Changes in ownership, net
    115,322       2,153       117,475       25,096  
Distributions to owners
    (35,125 )           (35,125 )     (1,142 )
Other comprehensive loss
    (4,860 )           (4,860 )     (240 )
 
                       
Balance, September 30, 2011
  $ 683,929     $ 5,237     $ 689,166     $ 39,360  
 
                       
                                 
            Non-                
    First     redeemable             Redeemable  
    Potomac     noncontrolling             noncontrolling  
    Realty Trust     interests     Total Equity     interests  
Balance, December 31, 2009
  $ 377,759     $     $ 377,759     $ 9,585  
Net loss
    (5,006 )           (5,006 )     (103 )
Changes in ownership, net
    107,155             107,155       1,862  
Distributions to owners
    (21,115 )           (21,115 )     (439 )
Other comprehensive income
    591             591       14  
 
                       
Balance, September 30, 2010
  $ 459,384     $     $ 459,384     $ 10,919  
 
                       
(13) Noncontrolling Interests in Partnerships
(a) Noncontrolling Interests in Operating Partnership
Noncontrolling interests relate to the interests in the Operating Partnership not owned by the Company. Interests in the Operating Partnership are owned by limited partners who contributed buildings and other assets to the Operating Partnership in exchange for Operating Partnership units. Limited partners have the right to tender their units for redemption in exchange for, at the Company’s option, common shares of the Company on a one-for-one basis or cash based on the fair value of the Company’s common shares at the date of redemption. Unitholders receive a distribution per unit equivalent to the dividend per common share. Differences between amounts paid to redeem noncontrolling interests and their carrying values are charged or credited to equity. As a result of the redemption feature of the Operating Partnership units, the noncontrolling interests are recorded outside of permanent equity. Noncontrolling interests are presented at the greater of their fair value or their cost basis, which is comprised of their fair value at issuance, subsequently adjusted for the noncontrolling interests’ share of net income, losses, distributions received, preferred dividends paid or additional contributions. Based on the closing share price of the Company’s common stock at September 30, 2011, the cost to acquire, through cash purchase or issuance of the Company’s common shares, all of the outstanding Operating Partnership units not owned by the Company would be approximately $36.4 million.
At December 31, 2010, 958,473 Operating Partnership units, or 1.9%, were not owned by the Company. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 1,963,388 Operating Partnership units valued at $28.8 million to partially fund the acquisition of 840 First Street, NE, which included the partial retirement of a contingent consideration obligation entered into with the seller at acquisition. Also during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, 1,300 Operating Partnership units were redeemed for 1,300 common shares fair valued at $19 thousand. As a result, 2,920,561 of the total outstanding Operating Partnership units, or 5.5%, were not owned by the Company at September 30, 2011. There were no Operating Partnership units redeemed with available cash during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

 

23


Table of Contents

(b) Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Partnerships
When the Company is deemed to have a controlling interest in a partially-owned entity, it will consolidate all of the entity’s assets, liabilities and operating results within its condensed consolidated financial statements. The cash contributed to the consolidated entity by the third party, if any, will be reflected in the permanent equity section of the Company’s consolidated balance sheets to the extent they are not mandatorily redeemable. The amount will be recorded based on the third party’s initial investment in the consolidated entity and will be adjusted to reflect the third party’s share of earnings or losses in the consolidated entity and any distributions received or additional contributions made by the third party. The earnings or losses from the entity attributable to the third party are recorded as a component of net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests.
At September 30, 2011, the Company’s consolidated joint ventures owned the following properties:
                         
            First Potomac        
            Controlling     Square  
Property   Acquired   Reporting Segment   Interest     Footage  
Redland Corporate Center II & III
  November 2010   Maryland     97 %     348,266  
1005 First Street, NE
  August 2011   Washington, D.C.     97 %     30,414 (1)
1200 17th Street, NW
  October 2011(2)   Washington, D.C.     95 %(2)     85,000 (2)
(1)  
The site is currently occupied by the Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc., which has announced its intention to relocate. Upon the tenant leaving, the Company intends on re-developing the site, which can accommodate up to 712,000 square feet of office space.
 
(2)  
The Company entered into a joint venture in the first quarter of 2011, which acquired the property in October 2011. The Company intends on demolishing the current building and constructing a 170,000 square foot office building. When fully capitalized, the Company anticipates owning a 95% interest in the joint venture.
(14) Segment Information
The Company’s reportable segments consist of four distinct reporting and operational segments within the greater Washington D.C, region in which it operates: Maryland, Washington, D.C., Northern Virginia and Southern Virginia. Prior to 2011, the Company had reported its properties located in Washington, D.C. within its Northern Virginia reporting segment. However, due to the Company’s growth within the Washington, D.C. region, it has altered its internal structure, which includes changing the Company’s internal decision making process regarding its Washington, D.C. properties. Therefore, the Company feels it is appropriate to separate the properties owned in Washington, D.C. into its own reporting segment.
The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on the operating results of the properties located within each segment, which excludes large non-recurring gains and losses, gains from sale of real estate assets, interest expense, general and administrative costs, acquisition costs or any other indirect corporate expense to the segments. In addition, the segments do not have significant non-cash items other than straight-line and deferred market rent amortization reported in their operating results. There are no inter-segment sales or transfers recorded between segments.

 

24


Table of Contents

The results of operations for the Company’s four reportable segments are as follows (dollars in thousands):
                                         
    Three months ended September 30, 2011  
    Maryland     Washington, D.C.     Northern Virginia     Southern Virginia     Consolidated  
Number of buildings
    67       4       55       57       183  
Square feet
    3,875,397       666,714       3,663,645       5,649,485       13,855,241  
 
                                       
Total revenues
  $ 13,045     $ 6,540     $ 12,978     $ 12,551     $ 45,114  
Property operating expense
    (3,336 )     (1,339 )     (3,031 )     (3,505 )     (11,211 )
Real estate taxes and insurance
    (1,235 )     (814 )     (1,198 )     (1,006 )     (4,253 )
 
                             
Total property operating income
  $ 8,474     $ 4,387     $ 8,749     $ 8,040       29,650  
 
                               
Depreciation and amortization expense
                                    (16,088 )
General and administrative
                                    (4,354 )
Acquisition costs
                                    (1,737 )
Change in contingent consideration related to acquisition of property
                                    1,487  
Impairment of real estate asset
                                    (3,111 )
Benefit from income taxes
                                    195  
Other expenses, net
                                    (9,754 )
 
                                     
Net loss
                                  $ (3,712 )
 
                                     
Capital expenditures(1)
  $ 3,570     $ 514     $ 5,216     $ 2,090     $ 12,297  
 
                             
                                         
    Three Months Ended September 30, 2010  
    Maryland     Washington, D.C.(2)     Northern Virginia     Southern Virginia     Consolidated  
Number of buildings
    68       1       51       54       174  
Square feet
    3,414,417       129,035       3,189,198       5,263,025       11,995,675  
 
                                       
Total revenues
  $ 10,596     $ 1,471     $ 9,681     $ 11,951     $ 33,699  
Property operating expense
    (2,536 )     (337 )     (2,120 )     (2,679 )     (7,672 )
Real estate taxes and insurance
    (1,046 )     (191 )     (715 )     (996 )     (2,948 )
 
                             
Total property operating income
  $ 7,014     $ 943     $ 6,846     $ 8,276       23,079  
 
                               
Depreciation and amortization expense
                                    (10,608 )
General and administrative
                                    (3,475 )
Acquisition costs
                                    (361 )
Other expenses, net
                                    (8,417 )
Loss from discontinued operations
                                    (3,153 )
 
                                     
Net loss
                                  $ (2,935 )
 
                                     
Capital expenditures(1)
  $ 2,477     $     $ 2,953     $ 2,851     $ 8,336  
 
                             

 

25


Table of Contents

                                         
    Nine months ended September 30, 2011  
    Maryland     Washington, D.C.     Northern Virginia     Southern Virginia     Consolidated  
Total revenues
  $ 38,649     $ 16,050     $ 35,774     $ 37,328     $ 127,801  
Property operating expense
    (10,179 )     (3,206 )     (8,621 )     (9,470 )     (31,476 )
Real estate taxes and insurance
    (3,629 )     (2,054 )     (3,598 )     (3,003 )     (12,284 )
 
                             
Total property operating income
  $ 24,841     $ 10,790     $ 23,555     $ 24,855       84,041  
 
                               
Depreciation and amortization expense
                                    (45,381 )
General and administrative
                                    (12,546 )
Acquisition costs
                                    (4,475 )
Change in contingent consideration related to acquisition of property
                                    1,487  
Impairment of real estate asset
                                    (3,111 )
Benefit from income taxes
                                    655  
Other expenses, net
                                    (26,650 )
Loss from discontinued operations
                                    (873 )
 
                                     
Net loss
                                  $ (6,853 )
 
                                     
Total assets(3)
  $ 467,101     $ 320,102     $ 416,347     $ 365,398     $ 1,673,783  
 
                             
Capital expenditures(1)
  $ 12,371     $ 1,192     $ 16,428     $ 5,629     $ 37,728  
 
                             
                                         
    Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010  
    Maryland     Washington, D.C.(2)     Northern Virginia     Southern Virginia     Consolidated  
Total revenues
  $ 32,367     $ 1,484     $ 30,272     $ 36,333     $ 100,456  
Property operating expense
    (8,113 )     (338 )     (7,148 )     (8,673 )     (24,272 )
Real estate taxes and insurance
    (3,111 )     (193 )     (2,945 )     (3,090 )     (9,339 )
 
                             
Total property operating income
  $ 21,143     $ 953     $ 20,179     $ 24,570       66,845  
 
                               
Depreciation and amortization expense
                                    (30,487 )
General and administrative
                                    (10,859 )
Acquisition costs
                                    (2,025 )
Change in contingent consideration related to acquisition of property
                                    (710 )
Other expenses, net
                                    (25,018 )
Loss from discontinued operations
                                    (2,855 )
 
                                     
Net loss
                                  $ (5,109 )
 
                                     
Total assets(3)
  $ 376,515     $ 68,577     $ 332,877     $ 328,124     $ 1,127,561  
 
                             
Capital expenditures(1)
  $ 3,400     $     $ 4,648     $ 6,247     $ 14,501  
 
                             
(1)  
Capital expenditures for corporate assets not allocated to any of our reportable segments totaled $907 and $55 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $2,108 and $206 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
 
(2)  
The Company acquired its first property located in Washington, D.C. on June 30, 2010.
 
(3)  
Corporate assets not allocated to any of our reportable segments totaled $104,835 and $21,468 at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
(15) Subsequent Events
During the first quarter of 2011, the Company entered into a joint venture with an affiliate of the Akridge Company. On October 12, 2011, the joint venture acquired a property located in Washington, D.C. at 1200 17th Street, NW for $39.6 million. The property currently consists of a land parcel that contains an 85,000 square foot office building. The joint venture intends to demolish the existing building and develop a new Class A 170,000 square foot office building. Construction is currently expected to commence in 2012 and is expected to be completed in late 2014. The Company funded its share of the purchase price through a $20.0 million mortgage, a draw on its unsecured revolving credit facility and available cash. The Company anticipates owning a 95% interest in the joint venture when it is fully capitalized.

 

26


Table of Contents

ITEM 2:  
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. The discussion and analysis is derived from the consolidated operating results and activities of First Potomac Realty Trust.
First Potomac Realty Trust (the “Company”) is a leader in the ownership, management, development and redevelopment of office and industrial properties in the greater Washington, D.C. region. The Company separates its properties into four distinct segments, which it refers to as the Maryland, Washington, D.C., Northern Virginia and Southern Virginia reporting segments. The Company strategically focuses on acquiring and redeveloping properties that it believes can benefit from its intensive property management and seeks to reposition these properties to increase their profitability and value. The Company’s portfolio contains a mix of single-tenant and multi-tenant office and industrial properties as well as business parks. Office properties are single-story and multi-story buildings that are used primarily for office use; business parks contain buildings with office features combined with some industrial property space; and industrial properties generally are used as warehouse, distribution or manufacturing facilities.
References in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements to “we,” “our” or “First Potomac,” refer to the Company and its subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis, unless the context indicates otherwise.
The Company conducts its business through First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership; the Company’s operating partnership (the “Operating Partnership”). The Company is the sole general partner of, and, as of September 30, 2011, owned a 94.5% interest in, the Operating Partnership. The remaining interests in the Operating Partnership, which are presented as noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, are limited partnership interests, some of which are owned by several of the Company’s executive officers and trustees who contributed properties and other assets to the Company upon its formation, and other unrelated parties.
At September 30, 2011, the Company wholly-owned or had a controlling interest in properties totaling 13.9 million square feet and had a noncontrolling ownership interest in properties totaling an additional 0.5 million square feet through four unconsolidated joint ventures. The Company also owned land that can accommodate approximately 2.4 million square feet of additional development. The Company derives substantially all of its revenue from leases of space within its properties. As of September 30, 2011, the Company’s largest tenant was the U.S. Government, which along with government contractors, accounted for over 20% of the Company’s total annualized rental revenue. The U.S Government also accounted for approximately 30% of the Company’s outstanding accounts receivables at September 30, 2011. The Company operates so as to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes.
The primary source of the Company’s revenue and earnings is rent received from customers under long-term (generally three to ten years) operating leases at its properties, including reimbursements from customers for certain operating costs. Additionally, the Company may generate earnings from the sale of assets either outright or contributed into joint ventures.
The Company’s long-term growth will principally be driven by its ability to:
   
maintain and increase occupancy rates and/or increase rental rates at its properties;
   
sell assets to third parties at favorable prices or contribute properties to joint ventures; and
   
continue to grow its portfolio through acquisition of new properties, potentially through joint ventures.
Executive Summary
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company incurred a net loss of $3.7 million compared with a net loss of $2.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in the Company’s net loss for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010 is primarily due to an increase in acquisition costs and interest expense as the Company issued additional debt and assumed several mortgages in its acquisition of properties in the fourth quarter of 2010 and the first nine months of 2011, which resulted in a higher weighted average interest rate of its outstanding debt. These additional costs were partially offset by changes in the fair value of various contingent consideration obligations.

 

27


Table of Contents

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company incurred a net loss of $6.9 million compared with a net loss of $5.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in the Company’s net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period in 2010 is primarily due to an increase in acquisition costs and impairment charges. The Company acquired six properties during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, incurring $4.5 million in acquisition costs, compared with two property acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, incurring $2.0 million in acquisition costs. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company incurred $5.8 million of impairment charges compared with $4.0 of impairment charges incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company incurred a $3.1 million impairment charge on a property in its Maryland reporting segment that reflects the Company’s shorter anticipated holding period for the property. The additional impairment charges incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 relate to properties that were subsequently disposed of by the Company and are reflected as discontinued operations on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
The Company’s funds from operations (“FFO”) were $10.6 million, or $0.21 per diluted share, and $32.3 million, or $0.63 per diluted share, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with FFO of $8.1 million, or $0.21 per diluted share, and $26.3 million, or $0.74 per diluted share, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. The increase in FFO for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same periods in 2010 is due to an increase in the Company’s net operating income. FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a description of FFO, including why management believes its presentation is useful and a reconciliation of FFO to net loss attributable to First Potomac Realty Trust, see “Funds From Operations.”
Significant Transactions Since June 30, 2011
   
Executed 1,134,000 square feet of leases; 443,000 square feet of which were new leases and 691,000 square feet were renewal leases, which reflected an 88% tenant retention rate;
   
Renewal leases included a 204,000 square foot lease with CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield at 840 First Street, NE, eliminating the Company’s largest 2013 lease expiration;
   
Entered into a $175.0 million unsecured term loan that is comprised of three-tranches with staggered maturity dates ranging from July 2016 to July 2018; and
   
Acquired two properties through joint ventures located in Washington, D.C. for total consideration of $78.0 million and a property in Chesapeake, Virginia for $16.7 million.

 

28


Table of Contents

Properties:
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company acquired two properties for an aggregate purchase price of $61.9 million. The Company acquired Greenbrier Towers, located in its Southern Virginia reporting segment, at an anticipated capitalization rate of 8.9% and 1005 First Street, NE, located in its Washington, D.C. reporting segment, at an anticipated capitalization rate of 6.5%. The following sets forth certain information for the Company’s consolidated properties by segment as of September 30, 2011 (including properties in development and redevelopment, dollars in thousands):
WASHINGTON, D.C.
                                                 
    Number                     Annualized                
    of     Sub-     Square     Cash Basis     Leased at     Occupied at  
Property   Buildings     Market(1)     Feet     Rent(2)     Sept 30, 2011(3)     Sept 30, 2011(3)  
 
                                               
Downtown DC-Office
                                               
 
500 First Street, NW
    1     Capitol Hill     129,035     $ 4,387       100.0 %     100.0 %
840 First Street, NE
    1     NoMA     247,146       6,840       100.0 %     100.0 %
1005 First Street, NE
    1     NoMA     30,414       2,496       100.0 %     100.0 %
1211 Connecticut Avenue, NW
    1     CBD     125,119       3,356       100.0 %     100.0 %
 
                                         
Total Consolidated
    4               531,714       17,079       100.0 %     100.0 %
 
                                         
 
                                               
Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
    1               111,373       4,051       100.0 %     100.0 %
Total Redevelopment
    1               135,000                        
 
                                         
Grand Total
    6               778,087     $ 21,130       100.0 %     100.0 %
 
                                         
(1)  
CBD = Central Business District; NoMA = North of Massachusetts Avenue.
 
(2)  
Annualized cash basis rent, which is calculated as the contractual rent due under the terms of the lease, without taking into account rent abatements, is reflected on a triple-net equivalent basis, by deducting operating expense reimbursements that are included, along with base rent, in the contractual payments of the Company’s full service leases. The operating expense reimbursements primarily relate to real estate taxes and insurance expenses.
 
(3)  
Does not include space in development or redevelopment.

 

29


Table of Contents

MARYLAND REGION
                                             
                        Annualized     Leased at     Occupied at  
    Number of         Square     Cash Basis     September 30,     September 30,  
Property   Buildings     Location   Feet     Rent(1)     2011(2)     2011(2)  
SUBURBAN MD
                                           
Business Park
                                           
Airpark Place
    3     Gaithersburg     82,414     $ 580       53.4 %     53.4 %
Ammendale Business Park(3)
    7     Beltsville     312,736       4,160       95.1 %     91.8 %
Gateway 270 West
    6     Clarksburg     255,491       2,825       75.8 %     75.8 %
Girard Business Park(4)
    7     Gaithersburg     298,011       2,974       89.7 %     86.7 %
Rumsey Center
    4     Columbia     134,514       1,191       72.4 %     68.8 %
Snowden Center
    5     Columbia     144,847       2,045       92.1 %     92.1 %
 
                                     
Total Business Park
    32           1,228,013       13,775       84.1 %     82.2 %
Office
                                           
15 Worman’s Mill Court
    1     Frederick     40,051       357       87.7 %     87.7 %
20270 Goldenrod Lane
    1     Germantown     23,518       75       25.9 %     25.9 %
Annapolis Commerce Park
    2     Annapolis     101,898       1,582       98.8 %     98.8 %
Campus at Metro Park
    4     Rockville     190,912       3,419       85.1 %     85.1 %
Cloverleaf
    4     Germantown     173,655       2,777       88.6 %     88.6 %
Gateway Center
    2     Gaithersburg     44,150       623       88.9 %     88.9 %
Merrill Lynch Building
    1     Columbia     136,488       1,549       74.2 %     71.7 %
Patrick Center
    1     Frederick     66,420       1,054       75.4 %     75.4 %
Redland Corporate Center-Bldg 3
    1     Rockville     139,120       3,364       100.0 %     100.0 %
West Park
    1     Frederick     28,620       286       73.4 %     73.4 %
Woodlands Business Center
    1     Largo     37,887       371       73.7 %     63.1 %
 
                                     
Total Office
    19           982,719       15,457       85.2 %     84.4 %
Industrial
                                           
Frederick Industrial Park(5)
    3     Frederick     550,418       4,021       89.0 %     89.0 %
Glenn Dale Business Center
    1     Glenn Dale     315,962       1,657       92.1 %     92.1 %
 
                                     
Total Industrial
    4           866,380       5,678       90.1 %     90.1 %
 
Total Suburban Maryland
    55           3,077,112       34,910       86.1 %     85.1 %
 
                                     
BALTIMORE
                                           
Business Park
                                           
Owings Mills Business Park(6)
    6     Owings Mills     219,284       2,009       76.8 %     74.4 %
Triangle Business Center
    4     Baltimore     74,182       510       63.2 %     63.2 %
 
                                     
Total Business Park
    10           293,466       2,519       73.4 %     71.6 %
Industrial
                                           
7458 Candlewood Road
    1     Hanover     295,673       1,321       72.8 %     39.4 %
 
                                           
Total Baltimore
    11           589,139       3,840       73.1 %     55.4 %
 
                                     
 
                                           
Stabilized Portfolio
    66           3,666,251       38,750       84.0 %     80.3 %
 
                                     
 
                                           
Lease Up Property
                                           
Redland Corporate Center-Bldg 2
    1     Rockville     209,146       3,131       64.7 %     6.4 %
 
                                     
 
                                           
Total Consolidated
    67           3,875,397       41,881       83.0 %     76.4 %
 
                                     
 
                                           
Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
    9           428,427       4,067       71.4 %     69.9 %
 
                                     
 
                                           
Grand Total
    76           4,303,824     $ 45,948       81.8 %     75.8 %
 
                                     
 
                                           
(1)  
Annualized cash basis rent, which is calculated as the contractual rent due under the terms of the lease, without taking into account rent abatements, is reflected on a triple-net equivalent basis, by deducting operating expense reimbursements that are included, along with base rent, in the contractual payments of the Company’s full service leases. The operating expense reimbursements primarily relate to real estate taxes and insurance expenses. (2) Does not include space in development or redevelopment.
 
(3)  
Ammendale Business Park consists of the following properties: Ammendale Commerce Center and Indian Creek Court.
 
(4)  
Girard Business Park consists of the following properties: Girard Business Center and Girard Place.
 
(5)  
Frederick Industrial Park consists of the following properties: 4451 Georgia Pacific Boulevard, 4612 Navistar Drive, and 6900 English Muffin Way.
 
(6)  
Owings Mills Business Park consists of the following properties: Owings Mills Business Center and Owings Mills Commerce Center.

 

30


Table of Contents

NORTHERN VIRGINIA REGION
                                                 
                                               
                            Annualized     Leased at     Occupied at  
    Number of             Square     Cash Basis     September 30,     September 30,  
Property   Buildings     Location     Feet     Rent(1)     2011(2)     2011(2)  
Business Park
                                               
Ashburn Center
    3     Ashburn     194,184     $ 2,728       100.0 %     100.0 %
Gateway Centre
    3     Manassas     101,534       993       76.0 %     76.0 %
Linden Business Center
    3     Manassas     109,838       793       58.4 %     58.4 %
Prosperity Business Center
    1     Merrifield     71,312       766       84.9 %     84.9 %
Sterling Park Business Center(3)
    7     Sterling     412,512       3,616       81.4 %     81.4 %
 
                                         
Total Business Park
    17               889,380       8,896       82.3 %     82.3 %
Office
                                               
Cedar Hill
    2     Tyson’s Corner     102,632       2,301       100.0 %     100.0 %
Flint Hill(4)
    1     Oakton     11,272             100.0 %     100.0 %
Herndon Corporate Center
    4     Herndon     127,918       1,620       84.0 %     79.7 %
Lafayette Business Park(5)
    6     Chantilly     254,296       3,178       80.2 %     80.2 %
One Fair Oaks
    1     Fairfax     214,214       5,020       100.0 %     100.0 %
Reston Business Campus
    4     Reston     82,988       1,034       86.0 %     86.0 %
Van Buren Business Park
    4     Herndon     92,462       712       56.1 %     56.1 %
Windsor at Battlefield
    2     Manassas     154,989       1,995       100.0 %     100.0 %
 
                                         
Total Office
    24               1,040,771       15,860       88.2 %     87.7 %
Industrial
                                               
13129 Airpark Road
    1     Culpeper     149,888       622       75.9 %     75.9 %
15395 John Marshall Highway
    1     Haymarket     236,082       3,369       100.0 %     100.0 %
Interstate Plaza
    1     Alexandria     109,029       947       78.2 %     78.2 %
Newington Business Park Center
    7     Lorton     254,272       2,459       88.7 %     87.6 %
Plaza 500
    2     Alexandria     505,074       5,976       84.7 %     84.7 %
 
                                         
Total Industrial
    12               1,254,345       13,373       86.8 %     86.6 %
 
                                         
 
                                               
Stabilized Portfolio
    53               3,184,496       38,129       86.0 %     85.7 %
 
                                         
 
                                               
Lease Up Property
                                               
Atlantic Corporate Park
    2     Sterling     221,182       933       25.7 %     15.0 %
 
                                         
 
                                               
Total Consolidated
    55               3,405,678       39,062       82.1 %     81.1 %
 
                                         
Total Redevelopment(4)
    3               242,576                        
 
                                         
Grand Total
    58               3,648,254     $ 39,062       82.1 %     81.1 %
 
                                         
(1)  
Annualized cash basis rent, which is calculated as the contractual rent due under the terms of the lease, without taking into account rent abatements, is reflected on a triple-net equivalent basis, by deducting operating expense reimbursements that are included, along with base rent, in the contractual payments of the Company’s full service leases. The operating expense reimbursements primarily relate to real estate taxes and insurance expenses.
 
(2)  
Does not include space in development or redevelopment.
 
(3)  
Sterling Park Business Center consists of the following properties: 403/405 Glenn Drive, Davis Drive, and Sterling Park Business Center.
 
(4)  
Flint Hill redevelopment is substantially complete but only the management office has been placed in service.
 
(5)  
Lafayette Business Park consists of the following properties: Enterprise Center and Tech Court.

 

31


Table of Contents

SOUTHERN VIRGINIA REGION
                                                 
    Number                             Leased at     Occupied at  
    of             Square     Annualized     September 30,     September 30,  
Property   Buildings     Location     Feet     Cash Basis Rent(1)     2011(2)     2011(2)  
 
                                               
RICHMOND
                                               
 
                                               
Business Park
                                               
Chesterfield Business Center(3)
    11     Richmond     320,412     $ 1,742       81.9 %     81.9 %
Hanover Business Center
    4     Ashland     183,587       699       64.2 %     64.2 %
Park Central
    3     Richmond     204,762       2,140       87.7 %     87.7 %
Virginia Center
    1     Glen Allen     118,145       1,950       85.2 %     85.2 %
 
                                         
Total Business Park
    19               826,906       6,531       79.9 %     79.9 %
 
                                               
Industrial
                                               
 
                                               
Northridge I, II
    2     Ashland     140,185       882       100.0 %     100.0 %
River’s Bend Center(4)
    6     Chester     795,080       4,431       94.2 %     94.2 %
 
                                         
Total Industrial
    8               935,265       5,313       95.1 %     95.1 %
 
                                         
 
                                               
Total Richmond
    27               1,762,171       11,844       87.9 %     87.9 %
 
                                         
 
                                               
NORFOLK
                                               
 
                                               
Business Park
                                               
 
                                               
Crossways Commerce Center(5)
    9     Chesapeake     1,087,250       10,664       92.2 %     82.5 %
Greenbrier Business Center(6)
    4     Chesapeake     411,657       4,170       80.9 %     79.3 %
1000 Lucas Way
    2     Hampton     182,323       1,401       96.3 %     96.3 %
Enterprise Parkway
    1     Hampton     363,892       1,804       60.1 %     60.1 %
Norfolk Commerce Park(7)
    3     Norfolk     261,989       2,308       69.3 %     64.9 %
 
                                         
Total Business Park
    19               2,307,111       20,347       82.8 %     77.5 %
 
                                               
Office
                                               
 
                                               
Battlefield Corporate Center
    1     Chesapeake     96,720       750       100.0 %     100.0 %
Greenbrier Towers
    2     Chesapeake     171,894       1,882       88.4 %     85.5 %
 
                                         
Total Office
    3               268,614       2,632       92.6 %     90.7 %
 
                                               
Industrial
                                               
 
                                               
1400 Cavalier Boulevard
    4     Chesapeake     394,308       1,561       88.6 %     88.6 %
Diamond Hill Distribution Center
    4     Chesapeake     712,683       2,953       88.5 %     81.2 %
 
                                         
Total Industrial
    8               1,106,991       4,514       88.5 %     83.8 %
 
Total Norfolk
    30               3,682,716       27,493       85.3 %     80.4 %
 
                                         
 
                                               
Total Consolidated
    57               5,444,887       39,337       86.1 %     82.8 %
 
                                         
 
                                               
Total Redevelopment
    1               38,998                        
 
                                         
 
                                               
Grand Total
    58               5,483,885     $ 39,337       86.1 %     82.8 %
 
                                         
(1)  
Annualized cash basis rent, which is calculated as the contractual rent due under the terms of the lease, without taking into account rent abatements, is reflected on a triple-net equivalent basis, by deducting operating expense reimbursements that are included, along with base rent, in the contractual payments of the Company’s full service leases. The operating expense reimbursements primarily relate to real estate taxes and insurance expenses.
 
(2)  
Does not include space in development or redevelopment.
 
(3)  
Chesterfield Business Center consists of the following properties: Airpark Business Center, Chesterfield Business Center, and Pine Glen.
 
(4)  
River’s Bend Center consists of the following properties: River’s Bend Center and River’s Bend Center II.
 
(5)  
Crossways Commerce Center consists of the following properties: Coast Guard Building, Crossways Commerce Center I, Crossways Commerce Center II, 1434 Crossways Boulevard, and 1408 Stephanie Way
 
(6)  
Greenbrier Business Center consists of the following properties: Greenbrier Technology Center I, Greenbrier Technology Center II, and Greenbrier Circle Corporate Center.
 
(7)  
Norfolk Commerce Park consists of the following properties: Norfolk Business Center, Norfolk Commerce Park II, and Gateway II.

 

32


Table of Contents

Development and Redevelopment Activity
The Company constructs office buildings, business parks and/or industrial buildings on a build-to-suit basis or with the intent to lease upon completion of construction. Also, the Company owns developable land that can accommodate 2.4 million square feet of additional building space. Below is a summary of the approximate building square footage that can be developed on the Company’s developable land and the Company’s current development and redevelopment activity (amounts in thousands):
                                         
            Square Feet     Cost to Date of     Square Feet     Cost to Date of  
Reporting   Developable     Under     Development     Under     Redevelopment  
Segment   Square Feet     Development     Activities     Redevelopment     Activities  
Maryland
    250           $           $  
Northern Virginia
    568                   15        
Southern Virginia
    841       166       477              
Washington, D.C.
    742                   135       1,225  
 
                             
 
                                       
 
    2,401       166     $ 477       150     $ 1,225  
 
                             
The Company anticipates the majority of the development and redevelopment efforts on all the Company’s projects will continue throughout the remainder of 2011 and into 2012.
At September 30, 2011, the Company had completed development and redevelopment activities that have yet to be placed in service on 243 thousand square feet, at a cost of $16.1 million, in its Northern Virginia reporting segment and 39 thousand square feet, at a cost of $1.2 million, in its Southern Virginia reporting segment. The majority of the costs on the construction projects to be placed in service relate to redevelopment activities at Three Flint Hill in the Company’s Northern Virginia reporting segment, which were completed in the third quarter of 2011 at a cost of $11.0 million. The Company will place completed construction activities in service upon the shorter of a tenant taking occupancy or twelve months from substantial completion.
Lease Expirations
Approximately 13% of the Company’s annualized base rent is scheduled to expire in the remainder of 2011 and 2012, excluding month-to-month leases. Current tenants may not renew their leases upon the expiration of their terms. If non-renewals or terminations occur, the Company may not be able to locate qualified replacement tenants and, as a result, could lose a significant source of revenue while remaining responsible for the payment of its financial obligations. Moreover, the terms of a renewal or new lease, including the amount of rent, may be less favorable to the Company than the current lease terms, or the Company may be forced to provide tenant improvements at its expense or provide other concessions or additional services to maintain or attract tenants. We continually strive to increase our portfolio occupancy, and the amount of vacant space in our portfolio at any given time may impact our willingness to reduce rental rates or provide greater concessions to retain existing tenants and attract new tenants. The Company’s management continually monitors its portfolio on a regional and per property basis to assess market trends, including vacancy, comparable deals and transactions, and other business and economic factors that may influence our leasing decisions. During the three months ended September 30, 2011, the Company had an 88% retention rate, based on square footage. The weighted average rental rate on the Company’s renewed leases increased 7.3% compared with the expiring leases.

 

33


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth a summary schedule of the lease expirations at the Company’s properties for leases in place as of September 30, 2011 for each of the ten full calendar years beginning January 1, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
                                                 
                                    Percent of        
                    Percent             Total        
    Number of             of Total             Annualized     Annualized  
Year of Lease   Leases             Square     Annualized     Cash Basis     Base Rent  
Expiration   Expiring     Square Feet     Feet     Cash Basis Rent.(1)     Rent     per Sq. Ft.(2)  
MTM(3)
    10       76,156       0.7 %   $ 701       0.5 %   $ 9.21  
2011
    57       394,237       3.5 %     4,624       3.4 %     11.73  
2012
    144       1,148,762       10.2 %     13,041       9.5 %     11.35  
2013
    139       1,654,391       14.7 %     20,561       15.0 %     11.12  
2014
    142       1,488,047       13.3 %     14,817       10.8 %     9.96  
2015
    81       819,379       7.3 %     8,760       6.4 %     10.69  
2016
    80       1,764,221       15.7 %     23,338       17.1 %     13.23  
Thereafter
    167       3,888,556       34.6 %     50,944       37.3 %     13.10  
 
                                     
 
                                               
Total
    820       11,233,749       100.0 %   $ 136,786       100.0 %   $ 11.99  
 
                                     
(1)  
Annualized cash basis rent, which is calculated as the contractual rent due under the terms of the lease, without taking into account rent abatements, is reflected on a triple-net equivalent basis, by deducting operating expense reimbursements that are included, along with base rent, in the contractual payments of the Company’s full service leases. The operating expense reimbursements primarily relate to real estate taxes and insurance expenses.
 
(2)  
Represents Annualized Cash Basis Rent divided by the square footage of the space.
 
(3)  
Reflects leases that are renewed on a month to month basis at September 30, 2011.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) that require the Company to make certain estimates and assumptions. Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that require subjective or complex judgments and are the policies and estimates that the Company deems most important to the portrayal of its financial condition and results of operations. It is possible that the use of different reasonable estimates or assumptions in making these judgments could result in materially different amounts being reported in its condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates relate to revenue recognition, including evaluation of the collectability of accounts receivable, impairment of long-lived assets, purchase accounting for acquisitions of real estate, derivative instruments and share-based compensation.
The following is a summary of certain aspects of these critical accounting policies and estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The Company generates substantially all of its revenue from leases on its office and industrial properties as well as business parks. The Company recognizes rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of its leases, which includes fixed-rate renewal periods leased at below market rates at acquisition or inception. Accrued straight-line rents represent the difference between rental revenue recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective lease agreements and the rental payments contractually due for leases that contain abatement or fixed periodic increases. The Company considers current information, credit quality, historical trends, economic conditions and other events regarding the tenants’ ability to pay their obligations in determining if amounts due from tenants, including accrued straight-line rents, are ultimately collectible. The uncollectible portion of the amounts due from tenants, including accrued straight-line rents, is charged to property operating expense in the period in which the determination is made.
Tenant leases generally contain provisions under which the tenants reimburse the Company for a portion of property operating expenses and real estate taxes incurred by the Company. Such reimbursements are recognized in the period in which the expenses are incurred. The Company records a provision for losses on estimated uncollectible accounts receivable based on its analysis of risk of loss on specific accounts. Lease termination fees are recognized on the date of termination when the related lease or portion thereof is cancelled, the collectability of the fee is reasonably assured and the Company has possession of the terminated space.

 

34


Table of Contents

Accounts and Notes Receivable
The Company must make estimates of the collectability of its accounts and notes receivable related to minimum rent, deferred rent, tenant reimbursements, lease termination fees and interest and other income. The Company specifically analyzes accounts and notes receivable and historical bad debt experience, tenant concentrations, tenant creditworthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. These estimates have a direct impact on the Company’s net income as a higher required allowance for doubtful accounts receivable will result in lower net income. The uncollectible portion of the amounts due from tenants, including straight-line rents, is charged to property operating expense in the period in which the determination is made.
Investments in Real Estate and Real Estate Entities
Investments in real estate and real estate entities are initially recorded at fair value and carried at initial cost, less accumulated depreciation and, when appropriate, impairment losses. Improvements and replacements are capitalized at fair value when they extend the useful life, increase capacity, or improve the efficiency of the asset. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense when incurred.
Depreciation and amortization are recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives of the Company’s assets, by class, are as follows:
     
Buildings
  39 years 
Building improvements
  5 to 20 years 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
  5 to 15 years 
Tenant improvements
  Shorter of the useful lives of the assets or the terms of the related leases
Lease related intangible assets
  Term of related lease
The Company regularly reviews market conditions for possible impairment of a property’s carrying value. When circumstances such as adverse market conditions, changes in management’s intended holding period or potential sale to a third party indicate a possible impairment of the fair value of a property, an impairment analysis is performed. The Company assesses potential impairments based on an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest charges) expected to result from the property’s use and eventual disposition. This estimate is based on projections of future revenues, expenses, capital improvement costs, expected holding periods and capitalization rates. These cash flows consider factors such as expected market trends and leasing prospects, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If impairment exists due to the inability to recover the carrying value of a real estate investment based on forecasted undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property. The Company is required to make estimates as to whether there are impairments in the carrying values of its investments in real estate. Further, the Company will record an impairment loss if it expects to dispose of a property, in the near term, at a price below carrying value. In such an event, the Company will record an impairment loss based on the difference between a property’s carrying value and its projected sales price, less any estimated costs to sell.
The Company will classify a building as held-for-sale in the period in which it has made the decision to dispose of the building, a binding agreement to purchase the property has been signed under which the buyer has committed a significant amount of nonrefundable cash and no significant financing contingencies exist that could cause the transaction not to be completed in a timely manner. The Company will classify any impairment loss, together with the building’s operating results, as discontinued operations in its consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented and classify the assets and related liabilities as held-for-sale in its consolidated balance sheets in the period the sale criteria are met. Interest expense is reclassified to discontinued operations only to the extent the held-for-sale property is secured by specific mortgage debt and the mortgage debt will not be transferred to another property owned by the Company after the disposition.
The Company recognizes the fair value, if sufficient information exists to reasonably estimate the fair value, of any liability for conditional asset retirement obligations when incurred, which is generally upon acquisition, construction, development or redevelopment and/or through the normal operation of the asset.
The Company capitalizes interest costs incurred on qualifying expenditures for real estate assets under development or redevelopment while being readied for their intended use in accordance with accounting requirements regarding capitalization of interest. The Company will capitalize interest when qualifying expenditures for the asset have been made, activities necessary to get the asset ready for its intended use are in progress and interest costs are being incurred. Capitalized interest also includes interest associated with expenditures incurred to acquire developable land while development activities are in progress and interest on the direct compensation costs of the Company’s construction personnel who manage the development and redevelopment projects, but only to the extent the employee’s time can be allocated to a project. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, capitalized compensation costs were immaterial. Capitalization of interest will end when the asset is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, but no later than one year from completion of major construction activity, if the property is not occupied. Capitalized interest is depreciated over the useful life of the underlying assets, commencing when those assets are placed into service.

 

35


Table of Contents

Purchase Accounting
Acquisitions of rental property from third parties are accounted for at fair value. Any liabilities assumed or incurred are recorded at their fair value at the time of acquisition. The fair value of the acquired property is allocated between land and building (on an as-if vacant basis) based on management’s estimate of the fair value of those components for each type of property and to tenant improvements based on the depreciated replacement cost of the tenant improvements, which approximates their fair value. The fair value of the in-place leases is recorded as follows:
   
the fair value of leases in-place on the date of acquisition is based on absorption costs for the estimated lease-up period in which vacancy and foregone revenue are avoided due to the presence of the acquired leases;
   
the fair value of above and below-market in-place leases based on the present value (using a discount rate that reflects the risks associated with the acquired leases) of the difference between the contractual rent amounts to be paid under the assumed lease and the estimated market lease rates for the corresponding spaces over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the related leases, which range from one to thirteen years; and
   
the fair value of leasing costs associated with existing tenants and the fair value of tenant relationships.
The Company’s determination of these fair values requires it to estimate market rents for each of the leases and make certain other assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the rental revenue, and depreciation and amortization expense recognized for these leases and associated intangible assets and liabilities.
Derivative Instruments
In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the effect of interest rate changes. The Company may enter into derivative agreements to mitigate exposure to unexpected changes in interest rates and may use interest rate protection or cap agreements to reduce the impact of interest rate changes. The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and intends to enter into derivative agreements only with counterparties that it believes have a strong credit rating to mitigate the risk of counterparty default or insolvency.
The Company may designate a derivative as either a hedge of the cash flows from a debt instrument or anticipated transaction (cash flow hedge) or a hedge of the fair value of a debt instrument (fair value hedge). All derivatives are recognized as assets or liabilities at fair value. For effective hedging relationships, the change in the fair value of the assets or liabilities is recorded within equity (cash flow hedge), or through earnings (fair value hedge). Ineffective portions of derivative transactions will result in changes in fair value recognized in earnings. The Company records its proportionate share of unrealized gains or losses on its derivative instruments associated with its unconsolidated joint ventures within equity and “Investment in affiliates.” The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual inputs and guarantees.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. For options awards, the Company uses a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatility is based on an assessment of the Company’s realized volatility over the preceding five years, which is equivalent to the awards expected life. The expected term represents the period of time the options are anticipated to remain outstanding as well as the Company’s historical experience for groupings of employees that have similar behavior and considered separately for valuation purposes. For non-vested share awards that vest over a predetermined time period, the Company uses the outstanding share price at the date of issuance to fair value the awards. For non-vested shares awards that vest based on performance conditions, the Company uses a Monte Carlo simulation (risk-neutral approach) to determine the value and derived service period of each tranche. The expense associated with the share-based awards will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award — the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). The fair value for all share-based payment transactions are recognized as a component of income from continuing operations.

 

36


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 with the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company acquired a building at One Fair Oaks; two buildings at Cedar Hill; a building at Merrill Lynch; a building at 840 First Street, NE; two buildings at Greenbrier Towers and a building at 1005 First Street, NE for an aggregate purchase cost of $251.5 million.
During 2010, the Company acquired the following consolidated properties: a building at Three Flint Hill; a building at 500 First Street, NW; a building at Battlefield Corporate Center; two buildings at Redland Corporate Center; two buildings at Atlantic Corporate Park; a building at 1211 Connecticut Ave, NW; a building at 440 First Street, NW and a building at 7458 Candlewood Road for an aggregate purchase cost of $286.2 million.
Collectively, the properties are referred to as the “Acquired Properties.”
The term “Existing Portfolio” refers to all consolidated properties owned by the Company for the entirety of the periods presented.
Total Revenues
Total revenues are summarized as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     Three Months     Nine Months  
    September 30,     September 30,             Percent             Percent  
(amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010     Increase     Change     Increase     Change  
 
                                                               
Rental
  $ 36,121     $ 27,520     $ 103,025     $ 80,665     $ 8,601       31 %   $ 22,360       28 %
Tenant reimbursements & other
  $ 8,993     $ 6,179     $ 24,776     $ 19,791     $ 2,814       46 %   $ 4,985       25 %
Rental Revenue
Rental revenue is comprised of contractual rent, the impact of straight-line revenue and the amortization of deferred market rent assets and liabilities representing above and below market rate leases at acquisition. Rental revenue increased $8.6 million and $22.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010, which was due to increased revenues from the Company’s recent acquisitions. The Acquired Properties contributed $8.8 million and $22.9 million of additional rental revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Rental revenue for the Existing Portfolio decreased $0.2 million and $0.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010, due to an increase in vacancy. The weighted average occupancy of the Existing Portfolio was 83.1% for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 compared with 85.0% for the same period in 2010. The Company expects aggregate rental revenues to increase for the remainder of 2011 due to a full-year of revenues from the properties acquired in 2010 and additional properties acquired in 2011.
The increase in rental revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010 includes $2.0 million and $6.2 million, respectively, for the Maryland reporting segment, $3.7 million and $11.0 million, respectively, for the Washington, D.C. reporting segment, $2.3 million and $4.3 million, respectively, for the Northern Virginia reporting segment and $0.6 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for the Southern Virginia reporting segment.

 

37


Table of Contents

Tenant Reimbursements and Other Revenues
Tenant reimbursements and other revenues include operating and common area maintenance costs reimbursed by the Company’s tenants as well as other incidental revenues such as lease termination payments, construction management fees and late fees. Tenant reimbursements and other revenues increased $2.8 million and $5.0 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010. The increase is due to the Acquired Properties, which contributed $2.5 million and $5.9 million of additional tenant reimbursements and other revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010. For the Existing Portfolio, tenant reimbursements and other revenues increased $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and decreased $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same periods in 2010. The increase in tenant reimbursements and other revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period in 2010 is due to an increase in construction management fees and termination fees. The Existing Portfolio’s decrease in tenant reimbursements and other revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period in 2010 is due to a reduction in recoverable expenses, primarily relating to snow and ice removal costs incurred in 2010. The Company expects tenant reimbursements and other revenues to increase for the remainder of 2011 due to a full-year of recoverable operating expenses from properties acquired in 2010 and 2011.
The increase in tenant reimbursements and other revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010 include $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively, for the Maryland reporting segment, $1.4 million and $3.6 million, respectively, for the Washington, D.C. reporting segment and $1.0 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the Northern Virginia reporting segment. For the Southern Virginia reporting segment, tenant reimbursements and other revenues slightly decreased for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and increased $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same periods in 2010.
Total Expenses
Property Operating Expenses
Property operating expenses are summarized as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     Three Months     Nine Months  
    September 30,     September 30,             Percent             Percent  
(amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010     Increase     Change     Increase     Change  
 
                                                               
Property operating
  $ 11,211     $ 7,672     $ 31,476     $ 24,272     $ 3,539       46 %   $ 7,204       30 %
 
                                                               
Real estate taxes and insurance
  $ 4,253     $ 2,948     $ 12,284     $ 9,339     $ 1,305       44 %   $ 2,945       32 %
Property operating expenses increased $3.5 million and $7.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010. The increase is due to the Acquired Properties, which contributed $3.0 million and $7.7 million of additional property operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. For the Existing Portfolio, property operating expenses increased $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period in 2010 primarily due to a decline in reserves for bad debt expense during the three months ended September 30, 2010, which was related to the reversal of reserves that were previously recorded as a result of the uncertainty associated with a tenant renewal. Property operating expenses, for the Existing Portfolio, decreased $0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 primarily due to a decline in snow and ice removal costs. The Company expects property operating expenses to increase for the remainder of the year compared with prior year results due primarily to the Company’s new acquisitions.
The increase in property operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010 includes $0.8 million and $2.1 million, respectively, for the Maryland reporting segment, $1.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively, for the Washington, D.C. reporting segment, $0.9 million and $1.4 million, respectively, for the Northern Virginia reporting segment, and $0.8 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 for the Southern Virginia reporting segment.
Real estate taxes and insurance expense increased $1.3 million and $2.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010. The Acquired Properties contributed an increase in real estate taxes and insurance expense of $1.2 million and $3.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. For the Existing Portfolio, real estate taxes and insurance expense increased $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010 and decreased $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010. During the first half of 2011, real estate taxes and insurance expenses were lower compared with 2010 due to lower real estate assessments and real estate tax rates, however, the Company recorded an increase in real estate taxes and insurance expense during the third quarter of 2011 compared with 2010 to reflect an increase in real estate tax assessments on its properties.

 

38


Table of Contents

Real estate taxes and insurance expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010, increased $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for the Maryland reporting segment, $0.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively, for the Washington, D.C. reporting segment and $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for the Northern Virginia reporting segment. For the Southern Virginia reporting segment, real estate taxes and insurance expense increased slightly for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 2010 and decreased $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 2010.
Other Operating Expenses
General and administrative expenses are summarized as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     Three Months     Nine Months  
    September 30,     September 30,             Percent             Percent  
(amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010     Increase     Change     Increase     Change  
 
                                                               
 
  $ 4,354     $ 3,475     $ 12,546     $ 10,859     $ 879       25 %   $ 1,687       16 %
General and administrative expenses increased $0.9 million and $1.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010 primarily due to an increase in employee compensation costs as the Company had 165 employees at September 30, 2011 compared with 145 employees at September 30, 2010. The increase in employee compensation costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010 was partially offset by a decrease in non-cash, share-based compensation expense.
Acquisition costs are summarized as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     Three Months     Nine Months  
    September 30,     September 30,             Percent             Percent  
(amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010     Increase     Change     Increase     Change  
 
                                                               
 
  $ 1,737     $ 361     $ 4,475     $ 2,025     $ 1,376       381 %   $ 2,450       121 %
Acquisition costs increased $1.4 million and $2.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010. During 2011, the Company acquired six properties, including two properties acquired in the third quarter of 2011, compared with two properties acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, both of which were acquired in the second quarter of 2010.
Depreciation and amortization expenses are summarized as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     Three Months     Nine Months  
    September 30,     September 30,             Percent             Percent  
(amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010     Increase     Change     Increase     Change  
 
                                                               
 
  $ 16,088     $ 10,608     $ 45,381     $ 30,487     $ 5,480       52 %   $ 14,894       49 %

 

39


Table of Contents

Depreciation and amortization expense includes depreciation of real estate assets and amortization of intangible assets and leasing commissions. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $5.5 million and $14.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010 primarily due to the Company’s recent acquisitions. The Acquired Properties contributed additional depreciation and amortization expense of $5.6 million and $14.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with 2010. The Existing Portfolio had a $0.1 million decrease in depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2011 primarily due to the acceleration of depreciation and amortization related to intangible assets in prior periods. Depreciation and amortization expense attributable to the Existing Portfolio increased $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period in 2010 primarily due to the disposal of assets from tenants that vacated during the year prior to reaching the full term of their lease. The Company anticipates depreciation and amortization expense to increase the remainder of 2011 due to recognizing a full-year of depreciation and amortization expense for properties acquired in 2010 and additional properties acquired in 2011.
Impairment of real estate asset is summarized as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     Three Months     Nine Months  
    September 30,     September 30,             Percent             Percent  
(amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010     Increase     Change     Increase     Change  
 
                                                               
 
  $ 3,111     $     $ 3,111     $     $ 3,111       100 %   $ 3,111       100 %
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company incurred a $3.1 million impairment charge on its Airpark Place property, located in its Maryland reporting segment, which reflects the Company’s shorter anticipated holding period for the property. The Company recorded additional impairment charges related to disposed properties, which are reflected within discontinued operations in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations, of $2.7 million in the first quarter of 2011 and $3.4 million and $4.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.
Changes in contingent consideration related to acquisition of property are summarized as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     Three Months     Nine Months  
    September 30,     September 30,             Percent             Percent  
(amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010     Change     Change     Change     Change  
 
                                                               
 
  $ (1,487 )   $     $ (1,487 )   $ 710     $ (1,487 )     100 %   $ (2,197 )     309 %
On March 25, 2011, the Company acquired 840 First Street, NE, in Washington, D.C. for an aggregate purchase price of $90.0 million, with up to $10.0 million of additional consideration payable in Operating Partnership units upon the terms of a lease renewal by the building’s sole tenant or the re-tenanting of the property through November 2013. Based on assessment of the probability of renewal and anticipated lease rates, the Company recorded a contingent consideration obligation of $9.4 million at acquisition. In July 2011, the building’s sole tenant renewed its lease through August 2023 on the entire building with the exception of two floors. As a result, the Company issued 544,673 Operating Partnership units to satisfy $7.1 million of its contingent consideration obligation. The Company recognized a $1.5 million gain associated with the issuance of the additional units, which represented the difference between the contractual value of the units and the fair value of the units at the date of issuance. At September 30, 2011, the remaining contingent consideration obligation was $0.7 million, which may result in the issuance of additional units dependent upon the leasing of any of the vacant space. The fair value of the contingent consideration obligation was determined based on several probability weighted discounted cash flow scenarios that projected stabilization being achieved at certain timeframes. The fair value was based, in part, on significant inputs, which are not observable in the market, thus representing a Level 3 measurement in accordance with the fair value hierarchy.
As part of the consideration for the Company’s 2009 acquisition of Ashburn Center, the Company is obligated to record contingent consideration arising from a fee agreement entered into with the seller in which the Company will be obligated to pay additional consideration if certain returns are achieved over the five year term of the agreement or if the property is sold within the term of the five year agreement. The Company initially recorded $0.7 million at the time of acquisition in December 2009, which represented the fair value of the Company’s potential obligation at acquisition. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company was able to lease vacant space at Ashburn Center faster than it had anticipated and, therefore, recorded additional contingent consideration of $0.7 million that reflected an increase in the potential consideration that may be owed to the seller. There was no significant change in the fair value of the contingent consideration related to Ashburn Center during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.

 

40


Table of Contents

Other Expenses, net
Interest expense is summarized as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     Three Months     Nine Months  
    September 30,     September 30,             Percent             Percent  
(amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010     Increase     Change     Increase     Change  
 
                                                               
 
  $ 11,207     $ 8,431     $ 30,307     $ 25,333     $ 2,776       33 %   $ 4,974       20 %
The Company seeks to employ cost-effective financing methods to fund its acquisitions, development and redevelopment projects and to refinance its existing debt to provide greater balance sheet flexibility or to take advantage of lower interest rates. The methods used to fund the Company’s activities impact the period-over-period comparisons of interest expense.
Interest expense increased $2.8 million and $5.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010. At September 30, 2011, the Company had $872.4 million of debt outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of 5.1% compared with $616.9 million of debt outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of 5.0% at September 30, 2010.
The increase in the Company’s interest expense is primarily attributable to an increase in mortgage interest expense, which increased $1.5 million and $4.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010 due to the assumption of additional mortgages associated with the Company’s 2011 and 2010 acquisitions. In July 2011, the Company entered into a three-tranche $175.0 million unsecured term loan and used the funds to pay down $117.0 million of the outstanding balance on its unsecured revolving credit facility, to repay its $50.0 million secured term loan and for other general corporate purposes. The unsecured term loan contributed additional interest expense of $0.9 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. The $50.0 million secured term loan, which was repaid with funds from the issuance of the $175 million unsecured term loan, was entered into during the fourth quarter of 2010 and contributed additional interest expense of $0.1 million and $1.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Also, the Company had incurred additional deferred financing costs with the assumption and issuance of new debt and the refinancing of its unsecured credit facility, which increased interest expense $0.3 million and $0.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company experienced a decrease in interest expense associated with its unsecured revolving credit facility of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, as a higher outstanding balance on the facility was offset by a lower applicable interest rate. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company’s weighted average borrowings outstanding on its unsecured revolving credit facility was $133.9 million and $133.3 million, respectively, with a weighted average interest rate of 2.7% and 3.0%, respectively, compared with weighted average borrowings of $125.7 million and $120.5 million with a weighted average interest rate of 3.3% and 3.6% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively
The increase in interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010 was partially offset by a decrease of $0.5 million in interest expense associated with the Company’s Exchangeable Senior Notes as $20.1 million of the notes were repurchased in the second quarter of 2010. In August 2011, the Company repaid its $20.0 million secured term loan with a draw on its unsecured revolving credit facility, which resulted in a decrease in interest expense of $0.1 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010. Also, the Company recorded an increase in capitalized interest, as a result of an increase in construction activities, of $0.2 million and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage exposure to interest rate fluctuations on its variable rate debt. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had hedged $200.0 million of its variable rate debt through six interest rate swap agreements, including $150.0 million of variable rate debt that was hedged during the third quarter of 2011. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company had fixed LIBOR on $85.0 million of variable rate debt through two effective interest rate swap agreements, which both expired in August 2010. As a result, interest expense related to the interest rate swap agreements increased $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010 and decreased $0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010.

 

41


Table of Contents

Interest and other income are summarized as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     Three Months     Nine Months  
    September 30,     September 30,             Percent             Percent  
(amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010     Increase     Change     Increase     Change  
 
                                                               
 
  $ 1,534     $ 89     $ 3,769     $ 285     $ 1,445       1624 %   $ 3,484       1222 %
In December 2010, the Company provided a $25.0 million subordinated loan to the owners of 950 F Street, NW, a 287,000 square-foot office building in Washington, D.C. The loan has a fixed interest rate of 12.5%. In April 2011, the Company provided a $30.0 million subordinated loan to the owners of America’s Square, a 461,000 square foot, Class A office complex in Washington, D.C. The loan has a fixed interest rate of 9.0%. The Company recorded interest income related to these loans of $1.5 million and $3.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. The increase in interest and other income was partially offset by a $0.1 million and $0.2 million decline in other income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to 2010, related to income received from the Company subleasing its former corporate office space. The Company’s lease on its former corporate office space and the associated sublease agreements expired on December 31, 2010.
Equity in losses of affiliates is summarized as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     Three Months     Nine Months  
    September 30,     September 30,             Percent             Percent  
(amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010     Increase     Change     Decrease     Change  
 
                                                               
 
  $ 81     $ 75     $ 112     $ 134     $ 6       8 %   $ 22       16 %
Equity in losses of affiliates reflects the Company’s ownership interest in the operating results of the properties, in which, it does not have a controlling interest. The increase in equity in losses of affiliates for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared with 2010 reflects a higher aggregate loss generated by the properties owned by these ventures. The decrease in equity in losses of affiliates for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 2010 reflects a smaller aggregate loss generated by the properties owned by these ventures.
Gain on early retirement of debt is summarized as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     Three Months     Nine Months  
    September 30,     September 30,             Percent             Percent  
(amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010     Change     Change     Decrease     Change  
 
                                                               
 
  $     $     $     $ 164                 $ 164       100 %
During the second quarter of 2010, the Company issued 0.9 million common shares in exchange for retiring $13.03 million of Exchangeable Senior Notes and used available cash to retire $7.02 million of its Exchangeable Senior Notes, which resulted in a gain of $0.2 million, net of deferred financing costs and discounts. The Company did not have any other retirements of its Exchangeable Senior Notes or other debt resulting in a gain or loss during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

 

42


Table of Contents

Benefit from Income Taxes
Benefit from income taxes is summarized as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     Three Months     Nine Months  
    September 30,     September 30,             Percent             Percent  
(amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010     Increase     Change     Increase     Change  
 
                                                               
 
  $ 195     $     $ 655     $     $ 195       100 %   $ 655       100 %
The Company owns four consolidated properties in Washington, D.C., 840 First Street, NE, 1211 Connecticut Avenue, NW, 440 First Street, NW and 1005 First Street, NE that are subject to income-based franchise taxes as a result of conducting business in Washington, D.C. The Company recorded a benefit from income taxes of $0.2 million and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. The Company did not own any properties located in Washington, D.C. that were subject to any Washington, D.C. income-based franchise taxes during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
Loss from discontinued operations is summarized as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     Three Months     Nine Months  
    September 30,     September 30,             Percent             Percent  
(amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010     Decrease     Change     Decrease     Change  
 
                                                               
 
  $     $ 3,153     $ 873     $ 2,855     $ 3,153       100 %   $ 1,982       69 %
Discontinued operations reflect the operating results of Aquia Commerce Center I & II and Gateway West (which were both sold in the second quarter of 2011), Old Courthouse Square (which was sold in the first quarter of 2011), and Deer Park and 7561 Lindbergh Drive (which were both sold in the second quarter of 2010). Gateway West, Old Courthouse Square, Deer Park and 7561 Lindbergh Drive were located in the Company’s Maryland reporting segment and Aquia Commerce Center I & II was located in the Company’s Northern Virginia reporting segment. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded a $3.4 million impairment charge related to its Old Courthouse Square property, which was sold in 2011. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, impairment charges associated with disposed properties were partially offset by gains on sale of real estate properties of $2.0 million and 0.6 million, respectively. The Company has had, and will have, no continuing involvement with these properties subsequent to their disposal.
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests is summarized as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     Three Months     Nine Months  
    September 30,     September 30,             Percent             Percent  
(amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010     Increase     Change     Increase     Change  
 
                                                               
 
  $ 265     $ 55     $ 469     $ 103     $ 210       382 %   $ 366       355 %
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests reflects the ownership interests in the Company’s net income or loss attributable to parties other than the Company. The change in net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests can be attributed to an increase in net loss during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same periods in 2010.

 

43


Table of Contents

The percentage of the Operating Partnership owned by noncontrolling interests increased to 5.5% as of September 30, 2011 compared with 1.9% as of September 30, 2010, which was due to the issuance of 1,418,715 Operating Partnership units to partially fund the acquisition of 840 First Street, NE during the first quarter of 2011 and the issuance of an additional 544,673 Operating Partnership units during the third quarter of 2011 to satisfy a contingent consideration obligation owed to the seller of 840 First Street, NE. At September 30, 2011, the Company had entered into three joint ventures in which it had a controlling interest and, therefore, consolidates the respective joint venture’s operating results within in consolidated statements of operations. At September 30, 2010, the Company did not have a controlling interest in any joint ventures. The Company reflects the joint venture partners’ operating results as net income or loss attributable to noncontrolling interests within its statements of operations. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the joint venture partners’ aggregate share in the operating results of the Company’s consolidated joint ventures was a $7 thousand loss.
Same Property Net Operating Income
Same Property Net Operating Income (“Same Property NOI”), defined as operating revenues (rental, tenant reimbursements and other revenues) less operating expenses (property operating expenses, real estate taxes and insurance) from the properties whose period-over-period operations can be viewed on a comparative basis , is a primary performance measure the Company uses to assess the results of operations at its properties. Same Property NOI is a non-GAAP measure. As an indication of the Company’s operating performance, Same Property NOI should not be considered an alternative to net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of the Company’s Same Property NOI to net income from its consolidated statements of operations is presented below. The Same Property NOI results exclude corporate-level expenses, as well as certain transactions, such as the collection of termination fees, as these items vary significantly period-over-period and thus impact trends and comparability. Also, the Company eliminates depreciation and amortization expense, which are property level expenses, in computing Same Property NOI because these are non-cash expenses that are based on historical cost accounting assumptions and management believes these expenses do not offer the investor significant insight into the operations of the property. This presentation allows management and investors to distinguish whether growth or declines in net operating income are a result of increases or decreases in property operations or the acquisition of additional properties. While this presentation provides useful information to management and investors, the results below should be read in conjunction with the results from the consolidated statements of operations to provide a complete depiction of total Company performance. The Company also presents Same Property NOI results for each of its reporting segments, including its Washington, D.C. reporting segment, which had one property owned for the entirety of the three months September 30, 2011 and 2010.

 

44


Table of Contents

Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 with the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
The following table of selected operating data provides the basis for our discussion of Same Property NOI for the periods presented:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended                     Nine Months Ended              
    September 30,     $     %     September 30,     $     %  
(dollars in thousands)   2011     2010     Change     Change     2011     2010     Change     Change  
Number of buildings (1)(2)
    167       167                   166       166              
 
                                                               
Same property revenue
                                                               
Rental
  $ 27,599     $ 27,807     $ (208 )     (0.7 )   $ 78,862     $ 79,611     $ (749 )     (0.9 )
Tenant reimbursements
    6,120       5,949       171       2.9       17,453       18,105       (652 )     (3.6 )
 
                                                   
Total same property revenue
    33,719       33,756       (37 )     (0.1 )     96,315       97,716       (1,401 )     (1.4 )
 
                                                   
 
                                                               
Same property operating expenses
                                                               
 
                                                               
Property
    7,894       7,735       159       2.1       22,095       23,233       (1,138 )     (4.9 )
Real estate taxes and insurance
    3,048       2,924       124       4.2       8,689       9,083       (394 )     (4.3 )
 
                                                   
Total same property operating expenses
    10,942       10,659       283       2.7       30,784       32,316       (1,532 )     (4.7 )
 
                                                   
 
                                                               
Same property net operating income
  $ 22,777     $ 23,097     $ (320 )     (1.4 )   $ 65,531     $ 65,400     $ 131       0.2  
 
                                                   
 
                                                               
Reconciliation to net income
                                                               
Same property net operating income
  $ 22,777     $ 23,097                     $ 65,531     $ 65,400                  
Non-comparable net operating income (3)
    6,873       (18 )                     18,510       1,445                  
General and administrative expenses
    (4,354 )     (3,475 )                     (12,546 )     (10,859 )                
Acquisition costs
    (1,737 )     (361 )                     (4,475 )     (2,025 )                
Depreciation and amortization
    (16,088 )     (10,608 )                     (45,381 )     (30,487 )                
Impairment of real estate asset
    (3,111 )                           (3,111 )                      
Contingent consideration related to acquisition of property
    1,487                             1,487       (710 )                
Other expenses, net
    (9,754 )     (8,417 )                     (26,650 )     (25,018 )                
Benefit from income taxes
    195                             655                        
Discontinued operations (4)
          (3,153 )                     (873 )     (2,855 )                
 
                                                       
Net loss
  $ (3,712 )   $ (2,935 )                   $ (6,853 )   $ (5,109 )                
 
                                                       
                                                                 
    Weighted Average                     Weighted Average  
    Occupancy                     Occupancy  
    2011     2010                     2011     2010  
Same Properties
    83.1 %     85.1 %                     83.6 %     85.1 %
 
(1)  
Same property results reflect properties whose results can be viewed on a comparative basis for the periods presented. Same property results exclude the results of the following non same-properties: RiversPark I and II, Three Flint Hill, Battlefield Corporate Center, Redland Corporate Center, Atlantic Corporate Park, 1211 Connecticut Ave, NW, 440 First Street, NW, 7458 Candlewood Road, 1750 H Street, NW, Aviation Business Park, Cedar Hill I & III, Merrill Lynch, 840 First Street, NE, One Fair Oaks, Greenbrier Towers I & II, 1005 First Street, NE, Davis Drive and Sterling Park — Building 7.
 
(2)  
The Company acquired 500 First Street, NW on June 30, 2010. The property was the Company’s first acquisition in its Washington, D.C. region and is only included above in the quarter over quarter comparison as it was not owned by the Company for the entirety of the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
 
(3)  
Non-comparable net operating income has been adjusted to reflect a normalized management fee percentage in lieu of an administrative overhead allocation for comparative purposes.
 
(4)  
Discontinued operations represent the results of operations and subsequent dispositions of Aquia Commerce Center I&II, Gateway West, Old Courthouse Square, Deer Park and 7561 Lindbergh Drive.

 

45


Table of Contents

Same Property NOI decreased $0.3 million, or 1.4%, and for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and increased $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same periods in 2010. Total same property revenues slightly decreased for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and decreased $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same periods in 2010 due to an increase in vacancy. The increase in vacancy for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was partially offset by an increase in rental rates and construction management fees. The decrease in total same property revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was also attributable to a reduction in recoverable expenses due to lower snow and ice removal costs. Compared with 2010, total same property expenses increased $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 due to an increase in real estate taxes as the third quarter of 2011 reflected higher tax assessments on several properties, and decreased $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 due to a reduction in snow and ice removal costs and real estate taxes, which were the result of lower tax assessments from the previous year.
Maryland
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended                     Nine Months Ended              
    September 30,     $     %     September 30,     $     %  
(dollars in thousands)   2011     2010     Change     Change     2011     2010     Change     Change  
Number of buildings (1)
    63       63                   63       63              
 
                                                               
Same property revenue
                                                               
Rental
  $ 8,601     $ 8,715     $ (114 )     (1.3 )   $ 25,669       25,962     $ (293 )     (1.1 )
Tenant reimbursements
    1,907       1,723       184       10.7       5,562       5,652       (90 )     (1.6 )
 
                                                   
Total same property revenue
    10,508       10,438       70       0.7       31,231       31,614       (383 )     (1.2 )
 
                                                   
 
                                                               
Same property operating expenses
                                                               
 
Property
    2,243       2,420       (177 )     (7.3 )     6,992       7,804       (812 )     (10.4 )
Real estate taxes and insurance
    993       1,042       (49 )     (4.7 )     2,943       3,108       (165 )     (5.3 )
 
                                                   
Total same property operating expenses
    3,236       3,462       (226 )     (6.5 )     9,935       10,912       (977 )     (9.0 )
 
                                                   
 
                                                               
Same property net operating income
  $ 7,272     $ 6,976     $ 296       4.2     $ 21,296     $ 20,702     $ 594       2.9  
 
                                                   
 
                                                               
Reconciliation to total property operating income:
                                                               
Same property net operating income
  $ 7,272     $ 6,976                     $ 21,296     $ 20,702                  
Non-comparable net operating income(2)
    1,202       38                       3,545       441                  
 
                                                       
Total property operating income
  $ 8,474     $ 7,014                     $ 24,841     $ 21,143                  
 
                                                       
                             
    Weighted Average                     Weighted Average  
    Occupancy                     Occupancy  
    2011     2010                     2011     2010  
Same Properties
    82.1 %     83.8 %                     82.3 %     83.8 %
(1)  
Same property results reflect properties whose results can be viewed on a comparative basis for the periods presented. Same property results exclude RiversPark I & II, Aviation Business Park, Redland Corporate Center II & III, 7458 Candlewood Road and Merrill Lynch.
 
(3)  
Non-comparable net operating income has been adjusted to reflect a normalized management fee percentage in lieu of an administrative overhead allocation for comparative purposes.

 

46


Table of Contents

Same Property NOI for the Maryland properties increased $0.3 million and $0.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010. Total same property revenues increased $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as increases in rental rates and construction management fees offset an increase in vacancy, and decreased $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 due to an increase in vacancy. Total same property operating expenses for the Maryland properties decreased $0.2 million and $1.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010 due to lower reserves for bad debt expense and real estate taxes. Total same property revenues also decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 due to a reduction in snow and ice removal costs.
Northern Virginia
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended                     Nine Months Ended              
    September 30,     $     %     September 30,     $     %  
(dollars in thousands)   2011     2010     Change     Change     2011     2010     Change     Change  
Number of buildings (1)
    49       49                   49       49              
 
                                                               
Same property revenue
                                                               
Rental
  $ 8,224     $ 8,070     $ 154       1.9     $ 24,451     $ 24,207     $ 244       1.0  
Tenant reimbursements
    1,695       1,508       187       12.4       5,336       5,616       (280 )     (5.0 )
 
                                                   
Total same property revenue
    9,919       9,578       341       3.6       29,787       29,823       (36 )     (0.1 )
 
                                                   
 
                                                               
Same property operating expenses
                                                               
Property
    2,111       1,960       151       7.7       6,495       6,714       (219 )     (3.3 )
Real estate taxes and insurance
    891       699       192       27.5       2,879       2,896       (17 )     (0.6 )
 
                                                   
Total same property operating expenses
    3,002       2,659       343       12.9       9,374       9,610       (236 )     (2.5 )
 
                                                   
 
                                                               
Same property net operating income
  $ 6,917     $ 6,919     $ (2 )     0.0     $ 20,413     $ 20,213     $ 200       1.0  
 
                                                   
 
                                                               
Reconciliation to total property operating income
                                                               
Same property net operating income
  $ 6.917     $ 6,919                     $ 20,413     $ 20,213                  
Non-comparable net operating income (loss)(2)
    1,832       (73 )                     3,142       (34 )                
 
                                                       
Total property operating income
  $ 8,749     $ 6,846                     $ 23,555     $ 20,179                  
 
                                                       
                             
    Weighted Average                     Weighted Average  
    Occupancy                     Occupancy  
    2011     2010                     2011     2010  
Same Properties
    84.1 %     84.4 %                     84.0 %     84.3 %
 
(1)  
Same property results reflect properties whose results can be viewed on a comparative basis for the periods presented. Same property results exclude the results of Three Flint Hill, Atlantic Corporate Park, Cedar Hill I & III, One Fair Oaks, Davis Drive and Sterling Park-Building 7.
 
(3)  
Non-comparable net operating income has been adjusted to reflect a normalized management fee percentage in lieu of an administrative overhead allocation for comparative purposes.
Same Property NOI for the Northern Virginia properties slightly decreased for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and increased $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same periods in 2010. Total same property revenues increased $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, due to an increase in rental rates, and slightly decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as an increase in rental rates was offset by a decline recoverable tenant expenses and non-cash revenue. Total same property operating expenses increased $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, due to an increase in real estate taxes, and decreased $0.2 million nine months ended September 30, 2011 due to lower snow and ice removal costs.

 

47


Table of Contents

Southern Virginia
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended                     Nine Months Ended              
    September 30,     $     %     September 30,     $     %  
(dollars in thousands)   2011     2010     Change     Change     2011     2010     Change     Change  
 
                                                               
Number of buildings (1)
    54       54                   54       54              
 
                                                               
Same property revenue
                                                               
Rental
  $ 9,390     $ 9,933     $ (543 )     (5.5 )   $ 28,742     $ 29,442     $ (700 )     (2.4 )
Tenant reimbursements
    2,008       2,336       (328 )     (14.0 )     6,555       6,837       (282 )     (4.1 )
 
                                                   
Total same property revenue
    11,398       12,269       (871 )     (7.1 )     35,297       36,279       (982 )     (2.7 )
 
                                                   
 
                                                               
Same property operating expenses
                                                               
Property
    3,117       3,027       90       3.0       8,608       8,715       (107 )     (1.2 )
Real estate taxes and insurance
    939       992       (53 )     (5.3 )     2,867       3,079       (212 )     (6.9 )
 
                                                   
Total same property operating expenses
    4,056       4,019       37       0.9       11,475       11,794       (319 )     (2.7 )
 
                                                   
 
                                                               
Same property net operating income
  $ 7,342     $ 8,250     $ (908 )     (11.0 )   $ 23,822     $ 24,485     $ (663 )     (2.7 )
 
                                                   
 
                                                               
Reconciliation to total property operating income
                                                               
Same property net operating income
  $ 7,342     $ 8,250                     $ 23,822     $ 24,485                  
Non-comparable net operating income (loss) (2)
    698       26                       1,033       85                  
 
                                                       
Total property operating income
  $ 8,040     $ 8,276                     $ 24,855     $ 24,570                  
 
                                                       
                             
    Weighted Average                     Weighted Average  
    Occupancy                     Occupancy  
    2011     2010                     2011     2010  
Same Properties
    82.7 %     86.0 %                     84.1 %     86.4 %
(1)  
Same property results reflect properties whose results can be viewed on a comparative basis for the periods presented. Same property results exclude the results of Battlefield Corporate Center and Greenbrier Towers I & II.
 
(3)  
Non-comparable net operating income has been adjusted to reflect a normalized management fee percentage in lieu of an administrative overhead allocation for comparative purposes.
Same Property NOI for the Southern Virginia properties decreased $0.9 million and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2010. Total same property revenues decreased $0.9 million and $1.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared the same periods in 2010 as a result of an increase in vacancy, a significant portion of which is related to the downsizing of the sole tenant at 1434 Crossways Boulevard. Total same property operating expenses slightly increased for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as an increase in utilities was offset by a decrease in reserves for anticipated bad debt expense, and decreased $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, primarily due to a decline in real estate taxes, snow and ice removal costs and reserves for anticipated bad debt expense.

 

48


Table of Contents

Washington, D.C.
                                 
    Three Months Ended              
    September 30,     $     %  
(dollars in thousands)   2011     2010     Change     Change  
Number of buildings (1)(2)
    1       1              
 
                               
Same property revenue
                               
Rental
  $ 1,384     $ 1,089     $ 295       27.1  
Tenant reimbursements
    510       382       128       33.5  
 
                         
Total same property revenue
    1,894       1,471       423       28.8  
 
                         
 
                               
Same property operating expenses
                               
Property
    423       328       95       29.0  
Real estate taxes and insurance
    225       191       34       17.8  
 
                         
Total same property operating expenses
    648       519       129       24.9  
 
                         
 
                               
Same property net operating income
  $ 1,246     $ 952     $ 294       30.9  
 
                         
 
                               
Reconciliation to total property operating income
                               
Same property net operating income
  $ 1,246     $ 952                  
Non-comparable net operating income (loss) (3)
    3,141       (9 )                
 
                           
Total property operating income
  $ 4,387     $ 943                  
 
                           
       
    Weighted Average  
    Occupancy  
    2011     2010  
Same Properties
    100.0 %     100.0 %
(1)  
Same property results reflect properties whose results can be viewed on a comparative basis for the periods presented. Same property results exclude the results of 1211 Connecticut Ave, NW, 440 First Street, NW, 1750 H Street, NW, 840 First Street, NE and 1005 First Street, NE.
 
(2)  
The Company acquired 500 First Street, NW on June 30, 2010. The property was the Company’s first acquisition in its Washington, D.C. region and is only included above in the quarter over quarter comparison as it was not owned by the Company for the entirety of the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
 
(3)  
Non-comparable net operating income has been adjusted to reflect a normalized management fee percentage in lieu of an administrative overhead allocation for comparative purposes.
Same Property NOI for the Washington, D.C. property increased $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period in 2010. Total same property revenues increased $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period in 2010 as a result of an increase in rental revenue. Total same property operating expenses increased $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 due to an increase in real estate taxes and management fees.

 

49


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
The Company seeks to maintain a flexible balance sheet, with an appropriate balance of cash, debt, equity and available funds under its unsecured revolving credit facility, to readily provide access to capital given the volatility of the market and to position itself to take advantage of potential growth opportunities. The Company expects to meet short-term liquidity requirements generally through working capital, net cash provided by operations, and, if necessary, borrowings on its unsecured revolving credit facility. The Company’s short-term obligations consist primarily of the lease for its corporate headquarters, normal recurring operating expenses, regular debt payments, recurring expenditures for corporate and administrative needs, non-recurring expenditures such as capital improvements, tenant improvements and redevelopments, leasing commissions and dividends to preferred and common shareholders.
Over the next twelve months, the Company believes that it will generate sufficient cash flow from operations and have access to the capital resources, through debt and equity markets, necessary to expand and develop its business, to fund its operating and administrative expenses, to continue to meet its debt service obligations and to pay distributions in accordance with REIT requirements. However, the Company’s cash flow from operations could be adversely affected due to uncertain economic factors and volatility in the financial and credit markets. In particular, the Company cannot assure that its tenants will not default on their leases or fail to make full rental payments if their businesses are challenged due to, among other things, the economic conditions (particularly if the tenants are unable to secure financing to operate their businesses). This may be particularly true for the Company’s tenants that are smaller companies. Further, approximately 13% of the Company’s annualized base rent is scheduled to expire during the next fifteen months and, if it is unable to renew these leases or re-let the space, its cash flow could be negatively impacted.
The Company also believes that it will have sufficient cash flow or access to capital to meet its obligations over the next five years. The Company intends to meet long-term funding requirements for property acquisitions, development, redevelopment and other non-recurring capital improvements through net cash provided from operations, long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness, including borrowings under its unsecured revolving credit facility, unsecured term loans, secured term loans and unsecured senior notes, proceeds from disposal of strategically identified assets (outright or through joint ventures) and the issuance of equity and debt securities including common shares through its controlled equity offering program. The amount of unused capacity under the unsecured revolving credit facility was $113.0 million at September 30, 2011.
For example:
   
In January 2011, the Company raised net proceeds of approximately $111 million through the issuance of 4.6 million 7.75% Series A Preferred Shares. The Company used $105.0 million of the proceeds to pay down a portion of its unsecured revolving credit facility;
   
On June 16, 2011, the Company amended and restated its unsecured revolving credit facility. Under the new agreement, the capacity on the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility was expanded from $225 million to $255 million and the maturity date was extended to January 2014 with a one-year extension at the Company’s option, which it intends to exercise. The interest rate on the unsecured revolving credit facility decreased from a range of LIBOR plus 275 to 375 basis points to a range of LIBOR plus 200 to 300 basis points, depending on the Company’s overall leverage; and
   
On July 18, 2011, the Company entered into a three-tranche $175.0 million unsecured term loan. The unsecured term loan’s three tranches have maturity dates staggered in one-year intervals. Tranche A has an outstanding balance of $60.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 215 basis points and matures on July 18, 2016. Tranche B has an outstanding balance of $60.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 225 basis points and matures on July 18, 2017. Tranche C has an outstanding balance of $55.0 million at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 230 basis points and matures on July 18, 2018. The Company used the funds to pay down $117.0 million of the outstanding balance on its unsecured revolving credit facility, to repay its $50.0 million senior secured term loan and for other general corporate purposes.
The Company’s ability to raise funds through sales of debt and equity securities and access other third party sources of capital in the future will be dependent on, among other things, general economic conditions, general market conditions for REITs, rental rates, occupancy levels, market perceptions and the trading price of the Company’s shares. The Company will continue to analyze which sources of capital are most advantageous to it at any particular point in time, but the capital markets may not be consistently available on terms the Company deems attractive, or at all.

 

50


Table of Contents

Financial Covenants
The Company’s outstanding corporate debt agreements contain specific financial covenants that may impact future financing decisions made by the Company or may be impacted by a decline in operations. These covenants differ by debt instrument and relate to the Company’s allowable leverage, minimum tangible net worth, fixed charge coverage and other financial metrics. As of September 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants of its outstanding debt instruments. Below is a summary of certain financial covenants associated with the Company’s outstanding debt at September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loans
                 
    Credit Facility /        
    Unsecured and        
    Secured Term        
    Loans     Covenant  
Unencumbered Pool Leverage(1)
    49.0 %     < 62.5 %
Unencumbered Pool Debt Service Coverage Ratio(1)
    4.58 x     > 1.75 x
Maximum Consolidated Total Indebtedness
    52.5 %     < 62.5 %
Minimum Tangible Net Worth
  $ 823,878       $>697,179  
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
    1.89 x     > 1.50 x
Maximum Secured Debt
    27.2 %     < 40 %
(1)  
Only applies to the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility.
Senior Notes
                 
    Senior Notes     Covenant  
Unencumbered Pool Leverage
    1.81 x     > 1.50 x
Unencumbered Pool Debt Service Coverage Ratio
    4.35 x     > 1.75 x
Maximum Consolidated Total Indebtedness
    56.6 %     < 65 %
Minimum Tangible Net Worth
  $ 730,394       $>697,179  
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
    1.71 x     > 1.50 x
Maximum Secured Debt
    28.1 %     < 40 %
Non-Financial Covenants in Mortgage Loan Documents
Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries are borrowers on mortgage loans, the terms of which prohibit certain direct or indirect transfers of ownership interests in the borrower subsidiary (a “Prohibited Transfer”). Under the terms of the mortgage loan documents, a lender could assert that a Prohibited Transfer includes the trading of the Company’s common shares on the NYSE, the issuance of common shares by the Company, or the issuance of units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. As of September 30, 2011, the Company believes that there were six mortgage loans with such Prohibited Transfer provisions, representing an aggregate principal amount outstanding of approximately $57.2 million, of which two mortgages totaling $38.9 million are scheduled to mature in 2012. Two of these mortgage loans were entered into prior to the Company’s initial public offering (“IPO”) in 2003 and four were assumed subsequent to its IPO. In each instance, the Company received the consent of the mortgage lender to consummate its IPO (for the two pre-IPO loans) or to acquire the property or the ownership interests of the borrower (for the post-IPO loans), including the assumption by its subsidiary of the mortgage loan. Generally, the underlying mortgage documents, previously applicable to a privately held owner, were not changed at the time of the IPO or the later loan assumptions, although the Company believes that each of the lenders or servicers was aware that the borrower’s ultimate parent was or would become a publicly traded company. Subsequent to the IPO and the assumption of these additional mortgage loans, the Company has issued new common shares and shares of the Company have been transferred on the New York Stock Exchange. Similarly, the Operating Partnership has issued units of limited partnership interest. To date, no lender or servicer has asserted that a Prohibited Transfer has occurred as a result of any such transfer of shares or units of limited partnership interest. If a lender were to be successful in any such action, the Company could be required to immediately repay or refinance the amounts outstanding, or the lender may be able to foreclose on the property securing the loan or take other adverse actions. In addition, in certain cases a Prohibited Transfer could result in the loan becoming fully recourse to the Company or its Operating Partnership. In addition, if a violation of a Prohibited Transfer provision were to occur that would permit the Company’s mortgage lenders to accelerate the indebtedness owed to them, it could result in an event of default under the Company’s Series A and Series B Senior Notes, its unsecured revolving credit facility, its unsecured term loan, its secured term loan and its Exchangeable Senior Notes.

 

51


Table of Contents

Cash Flows
Due to the nature of the Company’s business, it relies on net cash provided by operations to fund its short-term liquidity needs. Net cash provided by operations is substantially dependent on the continued receipt of rental payments and other expenses reimbursed by the Company’s tenants. The ability of tenants to meet their obligations, including the payment of rent contractually owed to the Company, and the Company’s ability to lease space to new or replacement tenants on favorable terms, could affect the Company’s cash available for short-term liquidity needs. The Company intends to meet short and long term funding requirements for debt maturities, interest payments, dividend distributions and capital expenditures through cash flow provided by operations, long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness, including borrowings under its unsecured revolving credit facility, proceeds from asset disposals and the issuance of equity and debt securities.
The Company could also fund building acquisitions, development, redevelopment and other non-recurring capital improvements through additional borrowings, issuance of Operating Partnership units or sales of assets, outright or through joint ventures.
Consolidated cash flow information is summarized as follows:
                         
    Nine Months Ended        
    September 30,        
(amounts in thousands)   2011     2010     Change  
 
                       
Cash provided by operating activities
  $ 26,801     $ 29,636     $ (2,835 )
Cash used in investing activities
    (126,866 )     (96,463 )     (30,403 )
Cash provided by financing activities
    81,431       66,617       14,814  
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period in 2010 primarily due to an increase in cash used to fund the Company’s escrows and reserves accounts, which was the result of additional mortgages assumed in 2011, and cash used for deferred costs, which include amounts paid for leasing commissions. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared the same period in 2010 was partially offset by an increase in the Company’s accounts payable and other expenses.
Net cash used in investing activities increased $30.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period in 2010 primarily due to an increase in cash used on additions to rental property and construction in progress. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company used $38.5 million of cash on additions to rental property and construction in progress compared with $14.5 million used during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in cash used in investing activities was also attributed by the Company providing a $30.0 million subordinated loan to the owners of an office building located in Washington, D.C. The increase in cash used by investing activities was partially offset by a reduction in cash used for property acquisitions. During the first nine months of 2011, the Company used $75.1 million of cash to acquire six properties and a land parcel compared with the use of $81.5 million of cash to acquire two office buildings during the first nine months of 2010. The 2011 acquisitions were partially funded by the assumption of mortgage debt totaling $139.4 million and the issuance of 1,963,388 Operating Partnership units valued at $28.8 million, while the 2010 acquisitions were funded with cash. As part of two property acquisitions in 2011, the Company was required to escrow $2.0 million for future tenant improvements. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had paid $8.2 million in deposits on potential acquisitions compared with $3.0 million in deposits paid as of September 30, 2010. Also, the Company received proceeds of $26.9 million from the sale of three properties during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with proceeds of $11.4 million received from the sale of two properties during the same period in 2010.

 

52


Table of Contents

Net cash provided by financing activities increased $14.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period in 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued $348.0 million of debt, which consisted of a $175.0 million unsecured term loan and borrowings under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility totaling $173.0 million compared with borrowings of $51.0 million under its facility and the issuance of a $39.0 million mortgage loan during the same period in 2010. The increase in cash provided by financing activities was offset by an increase in the repayment of outstanding debt, which totaled $339.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with repayments totaling $94.8 million during the same period in 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 4.6 million of Series A Preferred Shares for net proceeds of $111.0 million compared with the issuance of 6.8 million common shares for net proceeds of $94.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The proceeds from both the preferred and common share issuances during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were used to pay down a portion of the outstanding balance on the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility. As a result of the Company’s equity issuances during 2011 and 2010, its cash paid for dividends and distributions increased $14.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period in 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company received $2.2 million from its consolidated joint venture partners, which were applied toward the acquisitions of 1005 First Street, NE in August 2011 and 1200 17th Street, NW in October 2011.
Contractual Obligations
As of September 30, 2011, the Company had development and redevelopment contractual obligations of $4.7 million outstanding, primarily related to redevelopment activities at Three Flint Hill, located in the Company’s Northern Virginia reporting segment, which underwent a complete redevelopment and that was substantially completed at September 30, 2011. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had capital improvement obligations of $3.1 million outstanding. Capital improvement obligations represent commitments for roof, asphalt, HVAC and common area replacements contractually obligated as of September 30, 2011. Also, as of September 30, 2011, the Company had $9.6 million of tenant improvement obligations, primarily related to a tenant at Redland Corporate Center II & III, which is located in the Company’s Maryland reporting segment. The Company anticipates meeting its contractual obligations related to its construction activities with cash from its operating activities. In the event cash from the Company’s operating activities is not sufficient to meet its contractual obligations, the Company can access additional capital through its unsecured revolving credit facility. At September 30, 2011, the Company had $113.0 million available under its unsecured revolving credit facility.
In connection with the Company’s 2009 acquisition of Ashburn Center, the Company entered into a contingent consideration fee agreement with the seller under which the Company will be obligated to pay additional consideration upon the property achieving stabilization per specified terms of the agreement. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company leased the remaining vacant space at the property and recorded a contingent consideration charge of $0.7 million, which reflected an increase in the anticipated fee to the seller. As of September 30, 2011, the Company’s total contingent consideration obligation to the former owner of Ashburn Center was approximately $1.4 million.
On December 29, 2010, the Company entered into an unconsolidated joint venture with AEW Capital Management, L.P. and acquired Aviation Business Park, a three-building, single-story, office park totaling 121,000 square feet in Glen Burnie, Maryland. The property was acquired by the joint venture through a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure in return for additional consideration to the owner if certain future leasing hurdles are met. As of September 30, 2011, the joint venture’s total contingent consideration obligation to the former owner of Aviation Business Park was approximately $0.1 million, which is not reflected on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
On March 25, 2011, the Company acquired 840 First Street, NE, in Washington, D.C. for an aggregate purchase price of $90.0 million, with up to $10.0 million of additional consideration payable in Operating Partnership units upon the terms of a lease renewal by the building’s sole tenant or the re-tenanting of the property. As a result, the Company recorded a contingent consideration obligation of $9.4 million at acquisition. In July 2011, the building’s sole tenant renewed its lease through August 2023 on the entire building with the exception of two floors. As a result, the Company issued 544,673 Operating Partnership units to satisfy a portion of its contingent consideration obligation. The Company recognized a $1.5 million gain associated with the issuance of the additional units, which represented the difference between the contractual value of the units and the fair value of the units at the date of issuance. At September 30, 2011, the remaining contingent consideration obligation was $0.7 million, which may result in the issuance of additional units dependent upon the leasing of any of the vacant space.
As of September 30, 2011, the Company had $8.2 million in non-refundable deposits outstanding for future acquisitions, including 1200 17th Street, NW, which was acquired through a joint venture for $39.6 million on October 12, 2011 and financed through a draw on its unsecured revolving credit facility, the placement of a $20 million mortgage and available cash. The Company also has two additional acquisitions under contract, one of which will be acquired through a joint venture. The Company’s share of the total consideration for these transactions will be approximately $70 million, including the assumption of approximately $39 million of mortgage debt. The additional transactions are expected to close in November 2011.
The Company had no other material contractual obligations as of September 30, 2011.

 

53


Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
On January 1, 2010 and March 17, 2009, the Company deconsolidated the joint ventures that own RiversPark I and II, respectively, and removed all their related assets and liabilities from its consolidated balance sheets as of the date of deconsolidation. The Company remains liable for $7.0 million of mortgage debt, which represents its proportionate share. During the fourth quarter 2010, the Company entered into separate unconsolidated joint ventures with a third party to acquire 1750 H Street, NW and Aviation Business Park. For more information, see footnote 5 - Investment in Affiliates.
Distributions
The Company is required to distribute to its shareholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income in order to qualify as a REIT, including some types of taxable income it recognizes for tax purposes but with regard to which it does not receive corresponding cash. In addition, the Company must distribute to its shareholders 100% of its taxable income to eliminate its U.S. federal income tax liability. Funds used by the Company to pay dividends on its common shares are provided through distributions from the Operating Partnership. For every common share of the Company, the Operating Partnership has issued to the Company a corresponding common unit. The Company is the sole general partner of and, as of September 30, 2011, owned 95.5% interest in, the Operating Partnership’s units. The remaining interests in the Operating Partnership are limited partnership interests, some of which are owned by several of the Company’s executive officers and trustees who contributed properties and other assets to the Company upon its formation, and other unrelated parties. The Operating Partnership is required to make cash distributions to the Company in an amount sufficient to meet its distribution requirements. The cash distributions by the Operating Partnership reduce the amount of cash that is available for general corporate purposes, which includes repayment of debt, funding acquisitions or construction activities, and for other corporate operating activities. On a quarterly basis, the Company’s management team recommends a distribution amount that is approved by the Company’s Board of Trustees. The amount of future distributions will be based on taxable income, cash from operating activities and available cash and at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Trustees.
Dividends
On October 25, 2011, the Company declared a dividend of $0.20 per common share, equating to an annualized dividend of $0.80 per common share. The dividend is payable on November 11, 2011 to common shareholders of record as of November 4, 2011. The Company also declared a dividend of $0.484375 per share on its Series A Preferred Shares. The dividend is payable on November 15, 2011 to preferred shareholders of record as of November 4, 2011. For each dividend paid by the Company on its common stock, the Operating Partnership distributes an equivalent distribution on its Operating Partnership units.
Funds From Operations
Funds from operations (“FFO”) is a non-GAAP measure used by many investors and analysts that follow the real estate industry. The Company considers FFO a useful measure of performance for an equity REIT because it facilitates an understanding of the operating performance of its properties without giving effect to real estate depreciation and amortization, which assume that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, the Company believes that FFO provides a meaningful indication of its performance. Management also considers FFO an appropriate supplemental performance measure given its wide use by and relevance to investors and analysts. FFO, reflecting the assumption that real estate asset values rise or fall with market conditions, principally adjusts for the effects of GAAP depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, which assume that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time.
As defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) in its March 1995 White Paper (as amended in November 1999 and April 2002), FFO represents net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) on sales of real estate, plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. The Company computes FFO in accordance with NAREIT’s definition, which may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO, or similarly titled measures, used by other companies and this may not be comparable to those presentations. The Company’s methodology for computing FFO adds back noncontrolling interests in the income from its Operating Partnership in determining FFO. The Company believes this is appropriate as Operating Partnership units are presented on an as-converted, one-for-one basis for shares of stock in determining FFO per diluted share. On October 31, 2011, NAREIT issued revised guidance regarding the exclusion of impairment write-downs of depreciable assets in reported FFO. As a result, the Company will exclude impairment losses from FFO in future periods and will restate historical FFO to exclude such charges consistent with NAREIT’s guidance.

 

54


Table of Contents

Further, FFO does not represent amounts available for management’s discretionary use because of needed capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations or other commitments and uncertainties, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund the Company’s cash needs, including its ability to make distributions. The Company’s presentation of FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of the Company’s financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of its liquidity.
The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss attributable to common shareholders to FFO available to common shareholders and unitholders (amounts in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2011     2010     2011   2010  
 
                               
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
  $ (5,675 )   $ (2,880 )   $ (12,623 )   $ (5,006 )
Add: Depreciation and amortization:
                               
Real estate assets
    16,088       10,608       45,381       30,487  
Discontinued operations
          284       520       1,099  
Unconsolidated joint ventures
    520       188       1,556       426  
Consolidated joint venture
    (21 )           (61 )      
Gain on sale of real estate properties
                (1,954 )     (557 )
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership
    (272 )     (55 )     (476 )     (103 )
 
                       
 
                               
FFO available to common shareholders and unitholders
  $ 10,640     $ 8,145     $ 32,343     $ 26,346  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average common shares and Operating Partnership units outstanding — diluted
    51,830       38,165       51,380       35,718  
Forward Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations of the Company, are generally identifiable by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project” or similar expressions. The Company’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Certain factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company’s expectations include changes in general or regional economic conditions; the Company’s ability to timely lease or re-lease space at current or anticipated rents; changes in interest rates; changes in operating costs; the Company’s ability to complete current and future acquisitions; the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing; the Company’s ability to manage its current debt levels and repay or refinance its indebtedness upon maturity or other required payment dates; the Company’s ability to obtain debt and/or financing on attractive terms, or at all; and other risks detailed under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and in the other documents the Company files with the SEC. Many of these factors are beyond the Company’s ability to control or predict. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. For forward-looking statements herein, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company assumes no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements that become untrue because of subsequent events. We have no duty to, and do not intend to, update or revise the forward-looking statements in this discussion after the date hereof, except as may be required by law. In light of these risks and uncertainties, you should keep in mind that any forward-looking statement made in this discussion, or elsewhere, might not occur.
ITEM 3:  
QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company’s future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates. In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the effect of interest rate changes. The Company has historically entered into derivative agreements to mitigate exposure to unexpected changes in interest. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market interest rates. The Company periodically uses derivative financial instruments to seek to manage, or hedge, interest rate risks related to its borrowings. The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and only enters into contracts with major financial institutions based on their credit rating and other factors. The Company intends to enter into derivative agreements only with counterparties that it believes have a strong credit rating to mitigate the risk of counterparty default or insolvency.

 

55


Table of Contents

At September 30, 2011, the Company’s exposure to variable interest rates consisted of borrowings of $175.0 million on a three-tranche unsecured term loan, $142.0 million on its unsecured revolving credit facility and $30.0 million on a secured term loan. A change in interest rates of 1% would result in an increase or decrease of $3.5 million in interest expense on an annualized basis. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had fixed LIBOR on $200.0 million of its variable rate debt though six interest rate swap agreements, of which five interest rate swap agreements that fixed LIBOR on $150.0 million of variable rate debt were entered into in the third quarter of 2011.
The table below summarizes the Company’s interest rate swap agreements as of September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
                                 
                    Interest Rate        
                    Contractual     Fixed LIBOR  
Effective Date   Maturity Date     Amount     Component     Interest Rate  
January 2011
  July 2014   $ 50,000     LIBOR     1.474 %
July 2011
  July 2016     35,000     LIBOR     1.754 %
July 2011
  July 2016     25,000     LIBOR     1.7625 %
July 2011
  July 2017     30,000     LIBOR     2.093 %
July 2011
  July 2017     30,000     LIBOR     2.093 %
September 2011
  July 2018     30,000     LIBOR     1.660 %
 
                             
 
          $ 200,000                  
 
                             
For fixed rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair value of debt but not the earnings or cash flow of the Company. See footnote 10, Fair Value Measurements for more information on the fair value of the Company’s debt.
ITEM 4:  
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company carried out an evaluation with the participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files, or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended September 30, 2011, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
In October 2011, the Company replaced its accounting software with a new integrated ERP system, Yardi Voyager. The Company does not anticipate the implementation of the new software will result in any significant change to internal controls over financial reporting during the remainder of 2011.

 

56


Table of Contents

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.  
Legal Proceedings
As of September 30, 2011, the Company was not subject to any material pending legal proceedings.
Item 1A.  
Risk Factors
As of September 30, 2011, there were no material changes to the Company’s risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and updated in Item 1A “Risk Factors” in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.
Item 2.  
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3.  
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4.  
Removed and Reserved
Item 5.  
Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6.  
Exhibits
         
No.   Description
       
 
  3.1    
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-107172), as filed with the SEC on October 1, 2003).
  3.2    
Articles Supplementary designating First Potomac Realty Trust’s 7.750% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, par value $0.001 per share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-A filed on January 18, 2011)
  3.3    
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-107172), as filed with the SEC on October 1, 2003).
  4.1    
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of First Potomac Realty Investment, L.P. dated September 15, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-107172), as filed with the SEC on October 1, 2003).
  4.2    
Amendment No. 13 to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 19, 2011).
  4.3    
Amendment No. 14 to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011).
  4.4    
Form of First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership 6.41% Senior Notes, Series A, due 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on June 23, 2006).
  4.5    
Form of First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership 6.55% Senior Notes, Series B, due 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on June 23, 2006).
  4.6    
Note Purchase Agreement by and among the Registrant, First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership and the several Purchasers listed on the signature pages thereto, dated as of June 22, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2006).

 

57


Table of Contents

         
No.   Description
       
 
  4.7    
First Amendment, Consent and Waiver dated as of November 5, 2010 to the Note Purchase Agreement dated as of June 22, 2006, by and among the Registrant, First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership and the several Purchasers listed on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010).
  4.8    
Trust Guaranty, entered into by the Registrant, dated as of June 22, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2006).
  4.9    
Subsidiary Guaranty, dated as of June 22, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2006).
  4.10    
Indenture, dated as of December 11, 2006, by and among First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership, the Registrant, as Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2006).
  4.11    
Form of First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership 4.0% Exchangeable Senior Note due 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2006).
  10.1    
Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2011, by and among First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership and its subsidiaries listed on Schedule 1 thereto, KeyBank National Association, as a lender and administrative agent, and the other lenders and agents party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 22, 2011).
  10.2    
Guaranty, dated July 18, 2011, by First Potomac Realty Trust in favor of the agent and lenders party to the Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 22, 2011).
  10.3    
Amendment No. 5, dated September 30, 2011, by and among First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership and KeyBank National Association, to the Secured Term Loan Agreement, dated August 7, 2007, as amended to date, by and among First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership, KeyBank National Association and the other lending institutions which are a party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 6, 2011).
  31.1*    
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  31.2*    
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.1*    
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Further, this exhibit shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.)
  32.2*    
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Further, this exhibit shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.)
  101    
XBRL
XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). The following materials from the First Potomac Realty Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010; (ii) Consolidated statements of operations (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; (iii) Consolidated statements of cash flows (unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; and (iv) Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited). As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purpose of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act and Section 18 of the Exchange Act.
 
*  
Filed herewith.

 

58


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
 
  FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST    
 
       
Date: November 8, 2011
  /s/ Douglas J. Donatelli
 
Douglas J. Donatelli
   
 
  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer    
 
       
Date: November 8, 2011
  /s/ Barry H. Bass
 
Barry H. Bass
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
   

 

59


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
         
No.   Description
       
 
  3.1    
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-107172), as filed with the SEC on October 1, 2003).
  3.2    
Articles Supplementary designating First Potomac Realty Trust’s 7.750% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, par value $0.001 per share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-A filed on January 18, 2011)
  3.3    
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-107172), as filed with the SEC on October 1, 2003).
  4.1    
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of First Potomac Realty Investment, L.P. dated September 15, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-107172), as filed with the SEC on October 1, 2003).
  4.2    
Amendment No. 13 to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 19, 2011).
  4.3    
Amendment No. 14 to Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011).
  4.4    
Form of First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership 6.41% Senior Notes, Series A, due 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on June 23, 2006).
  4.5    
Form of First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership 6.55% Senior Notes, Series B, due 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on June 23, 2006).
  4.6    
Note Purchase Agreement by and among the Registrant, First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership and the several Purchasers listed on the signature pages thereto, dated as of June 22, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2006).
  4.7    
First Amendment, Consent and Waiver dated as of November 5, 2010 to the Note Purchase Agreement dated as of June 22, 2006, by and among the Registrant, First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership and the several Purchasers listed on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010).
  4.8    
Trust Guaranty, entered into by the Registrant, dated as of June 22, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2006).
  4.9    
Subsidiary Guaranty, dated as of June 22, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2006).
  4.10    
Indenture, dated as of December 11, 2006, by and among First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership, the Registrant, as Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2006).
  4.11    
Form of First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership 4.0% Exchangeable Senior Note due 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2006).
  10.1    
Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2011, by and among First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership and its subsidiaries listed on Schedule 1 thereto, KeyBank National Association, as a lender and administrative agent, and the other lenders and agents party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 22, 2011).
  10.2    
Guaranty, dated July 18, 2011, by First Potomac Realty Trust in favor of the agent and lenders party to the Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 22, 2011).

 

 


Table of Contents

         
No.   Description
       
 
  10.3    
Amendment No. 5, dated September 30, 2011, by and among First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership and KeyBank National Association, to the Secured Term Loan Agreement, dated August 7, 2007, as amended to date, by and among First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership, KeyBank National Association and the other lending institutions which are a party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 6, 2011).
  31.1*    
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  31.2*    
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.1*    
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Further, this exhibit shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.)
  32.2*    
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Further, this exhibit shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.)
  101    
XBRL
XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). The following materials from the First Potomac Realty Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010; (ii) Consolidated statements of operations (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; (iii) Consolidated statements of cash flows (unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; and (iv) Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited). As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purpose of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act and Section 18 of the Exchange Act.
 
*  
Filed herewith.