Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - RAAM Global Energy Co | Financial_Report.xls |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - RAAM Global Energy Co | dex311.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - RAAM Global Energy Co | dex321.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - RAAM Global Energy Co | dex312.htm |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - RAAM Global Energy Co | dex322.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2011
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
Commission File No. 333-172897
RAAM Global Energy Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 20-0412973 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
1537 Bull Lea Rd., Suite 200 Lexington, Kentucky |
40511 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(859) 253-1300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ¨ |
Accelerated filer ¨ |
Non-accelerated filer þ |
Smaller reporting company ¨ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
As of August 10, 2011, there were 60,000 shares of common stock outstanding.
Table of Contents
2
Table of Contents
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. These forward looking statements are based on managements current belief, based on currently available information, as to the outcome and timing of future events. Forward looking statements may include statements that relate to, among other things, our:
| forward looking oil and natural gas reserve estimates; |
| future financial and operating performance and results; |
| business and financial strategy and budgets; |
| market prices; |
| drilling of wells and the anticipated results thereof; |
| timing and amount of future production of oil and natural gas; |
| competition and government regulations; |
| prospect development; |
| property acquisitions and sales; and |
| plans, forecasts, objectives, expectations and intentions. |
All statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this report, regarding our strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward looking statements. When used in this report, the words could, believe, anticipate, intend, estimate, expect, project and similar expressions are intended to identify forward looking statements, although not all forward looking statements contain such identifying words. These forward looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions about future events and are based on currently available information as to the outcome and timing of future events. When considering forward looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors described in our registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-172897) filed with the SEC on March 17, 2011 (Form S-4) and other cautionary statements described under Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors included in this report.
Forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the anticipated future results or financial condition expressed or implied by the forward looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include but are not limited to:
| low and/or declining prices for oil and natural gas and oil and natural gas price volatility; |
| risks associated with drilling, including completion risks, cost overruns and the drilling of non-economic wells or dry holes; |
| ability to raise additional capital to fund future capital expenditures; |
| cash flow and liquidity; |
| ability to find, acquire, market, develop and produce new oil and natural gas properties; |
| uncertainties in the estimation of proved reserves and in the projection of future rates of production and timing of development expenditures; |
3
Table of Contents
| geological concentration of our reserves; |
| discovery, acquisition, development and replacement of oil and natural gas reserves; |
| operating hazards attendant to the oil and natural gas business; |
| potential mechanical failure or under-performance of significant wells or pipeline mishaps; |
| delays in anticipated start-up dates; |
| actions or inactions of third-party operators of our properties; |
| ability to find and retain skilled personnel; |
| strength and financial resources of competitors; |
| federal and state regulatory developments and approvals; |
| environmental risks; |
| changes in interest rates; |
| weather conditions or events similar to those of September 11, 2001, Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Gustav and Ike and the Deepwater Horizon explosion; and |
| worldwide political and economic conditions. |
Reserve engineering is a process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact way. The accuracy of any reserve estimate depends on the quality of available data, the interpretation of such data, and price and cost assumptions made by reservoir engineers. In addition, the results of drilling, testing, and production activities may justify revisions of estimates that were made previously. If significant, such revisions could change the schedule of any further production and development drilling. Accordingly, reserve estimates may differ significantly from the quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered.
All subsequent written and oral forward looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section and any other cautionary statements that may accompany such forward looking statements. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, we disclaim any duty to update any forward looking statements, all of which are expressly qualified by the statements in this section, to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report.
Our revenues, operating results, financial condition and ability to borrow funds or obtain additional capital depend substantially on prevailing prices for oil and natural gas. Declines in oil or natural gas prices may materially adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity, ability to obtain financing and operating results. Lower oil or natural gas prices also may reduce the amount of oil or natural gas that we can produce economically. A decline in oil and/or natural gas prices could have a material adverse effect on the estimated value and estimated quantities of our oil and natural gas reserves, our ability to fund our operations and our financial condition, cash flow, results of operations and access to capital. Historically, oil and natural gas prices and markets have been volatile, with prices fluctuating widely, and they are likely to continue to be volatile.
4
Table of Contents
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for share amounts)
(unaudited)
June 30,
2011 |
December 31,
2010 |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 71,221 | $ | 81,032 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of $1,005 and $235 provision for bad debts in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
3,204 | 22,412 | ||||||
Revenues receivable |
28,741 | 21,703 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
2,987 | 2,955 | ||||||
Commodity derivatives current portion |
2,669 | 9,377 | ||||||
Prepaid assets |
10,150 | 4,200 | ||||||
Other current assets |
3,900 | 3,784 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total current assets |
122,872 | 145,463 | ||||||
Oil and gas properties (full-cost method): |
||||||||
Properties being amortized |
1,065,479 | 1,009,071 | ||||||
Properties not subject to amortization |
95,640 | 81,656 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization |
(684,113) | (653,777) | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Net oil and gas properties |
477,006 | 436,950 | ||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||
Other capitalized assets, net |
7,249 | 7,246 | ||||||
Commodity derivatives |
611 | 263 | ||||||
Equity investments |
2,044 | 2,044 | ||||||
Other |
18,449 | 5,320 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total other assets |
28,353 | 14,873 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total assets |
$ | 628,231 | $ | 597,286 | ||||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
RAAM GLOBAL ENERGY COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for share amounts)
(unaudited)
June 30,
2011 |
December 31,
2010 |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
$ | 14,074 | $ | 19,587 | ||||
Revenues payable |
26,320 | 17,834 | ||||||
Interest payable - senior secured notes |
4,688 | 5,048 | ||||||
Current taxes payable |
614 | 924 | ||||||
Advances from joint interest partners |
909 | | ||||||
Commodity derivatives - current portion |
2,479 | 1,973 | ||||||
Asset retirement obligations - current portion |
2,406 | 2,406 | ||||||
Long-term debt current portion |
6,390 | 1,112 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes current portion |
797 | 1,810 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total current liabilities |
58,677 | 50,694 | ||||||
Other liabilities: |
||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
610 | 861 | ||||||
Asset retirement obligations |
22,342 | 20,946 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
2,787 | 2,860 | ||||||
Senior secured notes |
148,781 | 148,681 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
99,102 | 90,870 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total other liabilities |
273,622 | 264,218 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
332,299 | 314,912 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 10) |
||||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
20,956 | 2,467 | ||||||
Shareholders equity : |
||||||||
Common stock, no par value, 380,000 shares authorized, 60,000 issued and outstanding in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
56,096 | 56,096 | ||||||
Treasury stock, 5,166 shares in 2011 and 2010 |
(5,736) | (5,736) | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes |
1,593 | 5,977 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
223,023 | 223,570 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total shareholders equity |
274,976 | 279,907 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 628,231 | $ | 597,286 | ||||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30 | Six Months Ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2011 |
2010 |
2011 |
2010 |
|||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Gas sales |
$ 25,110 | $ | 33,828 | $ | 49,424 | $ | 68,587 | |||||||||
Oil sales |
25,747 | 21,052 | 46,906 | 42,998 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
50,857 | 54,880 | 96,330 | 111,585 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Production and delivery costs |
8,890 | 6,923 | 16,352 | 14,811 | ||||||||||||
Workover costs |
786 | 777 | 1,218 | 2,067 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
13,927 | 13,842 | 31,066 | 39,542 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
3,966 | 3,253 | 8,345 | 6,391 | ||||||||||||
Bad debt expense |
770 | | 770 | | ||||||||||||
Derivative (income) expense |
(292) | 515 | (539) | 309 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total operating expense |
28,047 | 25,310 | 57,212 | 63,120 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
22,810 | 29,570 | 39,118 | 48,465 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expenses): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(2,949) | (900) | (6,348) | (1,638) | ||||||||||||
Other, net |
(13) | 470 | 181 | 536 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total other income (expenses): |
(2,962) | (430) | (6,167) | (1,102) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Income before taxes |
19,848 | 29,140 | 32,951 | 47,363 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
9,354 | 10,541 | 12,010 | 17,214 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income including noncontrolling interest |
$ 10,494 | $ | 18,599 | $ | 20,941 | $ | 30,149 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest (net of tax) |
1,022 | 573 | 1,476 | 946 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to RAAM Global |
$ 9,472 | $ | 18,026 | $ | 19,465 | $ | 29,203 | |||||||||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30 | ||||||||
2011 |
2010 |
|||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net income including noncontrolling interest |
$ | 20,941 | $ | 30,149 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
31,936 | 39,894 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
7,219 | 4,739 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of inventory and properties |
20 | | ||||||
Changes in components of working capital: |
||||||||
Accounts and revenues receivable |
12,171 | 6,493 | ||||||
Insurance receivable |
| 6,050 | ||||||
Income tax receivables |
| (3,880) | ||||||
Other current assets |
(6,085 | ) | (6,829) | |||||
Change in derivatives, net |
2,230 | 2,603 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(4,520 | ) | (20,613) | |||||
Current taxes payable |
(343 | ) | (314) | |||||
Interest payable on Senior Notes |
(361 | ) | | |||||
Revenues payable |
8,486 | (1,187) | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
71,694 | 57,105 | ||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||
Change in investments |
| 149 | ||||||
Change in advances from joint interest partners |
909 | (991) | ||||||
Payment of prepaid drilling expenses |
(14,000 | ) | | |||||
Additions to oil and gas properties and equipment |
(72,845 | ) | (28,972) | |||||
Proceeds from net sales of oil and gas properties |
2,125 | | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(83,811 | ) | (29,814) | |||||
Financing activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from long-term borrowings |
8,037 | 8,874 | ||||||
Payments on long-term borrowings |
(2,832 | ) | (12,055) | |||||
Deferred loan costs |
| 304 | ||||||
Payment of dividends |
(3,000 | ) | (3,000) | |||||
Other |
101 | | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
2,306 | (5,877) | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(9,811 | ) | 21,414 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
81,032 | 28,888 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 71,221 | $ | 50,302 | ||||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
8
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | Organization and Nature of Business |
RAAM Global Energy Company (RAAM Global or the Company) is engaged primarily in the exploration and development of oil and gas properties and in the resulting production and sale of natural gas, condensate and crude oil. The Companys production facilities are located in the Gulf of Mexico, offshore Louisiana and onshore Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, and Oklahoma.
2. | Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of RAAM Global include the accounts of RAAM Global, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, its majority-owned joint venture and variable interest entities where RAAM Global is the primary beneficiary. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are unaudited; however, in the opinion of the Companys management, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the interim financial results have been included. These adjustments were of a normal recurring nature. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other interim period or for the entire year.
The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2010, was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP). Certain notes and other information have been condensed or omitted from the interim financial statements presented in this quarterly report. Therefore, these financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited financial statements included in our registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-172897) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates. The Companys most significant financial estimates are based on remaining proved oil and gas reserves.
Oil and Gas Properties
The Company uses the full-cost method of accounting for exploration and development costs. Accordingly, all costs associated with acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas reserves, including interest related to significant properties being evaluated and directly related overhead costs, are capitalized. Capitalized overhead costs amounted to $1.3 million and $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and these costs amounted to $2.5 million and $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
All capitalized costs of oil and gas properties are amortized through depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) using the future gross revenue method whereby the annual provision is computed by dividing revenue earned during the period by future gross revenues at the beginning of the period, and applying the resulting rate to the cost of oil and gas properties, including estimated future development and abandonment costs.
Investments in unproved properties and major development projects are not amortized until proved reserves are attributed to the projects or until impairment occurs. If the results of an assessment indicate that the properties are impaired, that portion of such costs is added to the capitalized costs to be amortized.
9
Table of Contents
Unevaluated properties and associated costs not currently being amortized and included in oil and gas properties were $95.6 million and $81.7 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company believes that the unevaluated properties at June 30, 2011 will be substantially evaluated during 2011, 2012 and 2013, and the costs will begin to be amortized at that time. The Company capitalized interest of $2.2 million and $0.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to significant properties not subject to amortization. The Company capitalized interest of $4.0 million and $0.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to significant properties not subject to amortization.
Capitalized oil and gas property costs are subject to a ceiling test, which limits such costs to the aggregate of the estimated present value, discounted at 10%, of future net cash flows from proved reserves, based on current economic and operating conditions, plus the lower of cost or fair value of unproved properties, each after income tax effects. Details specific to the Companys ceiling tests for the periods presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are discussed later in this footnote section.
Sales of proved and unproved properties are accounted for as adjustments of capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recognized, unless such adjustments would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of oil and gas, in which case the gain or loss is recognized in current income.
During the second quarter of 2011, the Company sold approximately 16,000 acres onshore Mississippi to an unrelated third party oil and gas company. The final sales price amounted to $2.2 million and was recorded in cash and as an accumulated reduction to our net oil and gas properties on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2011. Under the full cost accounting method, the transaction is recorded as a reduction to net oil and gas properties with no income statement impact because the original cost of the acreage is not a significant percentage of the Companys consolidated capitalized costs. The cash payment was collected during May 2011.
During the second quarter of 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with an unrelated third party to acquire a 40% working interest in drilling activities in Oklahoma. The Company prepaid $14 million in drilling expenses for this program. This prepayment is recorded in Other, in the Other assets section of the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The third party we have entered into the agreement with will send the Company joint interest billing information on a periodic basis reflecting the amount of our prepayment that has been utilized for drilling activities. Based on this information, the prepayment will be reduced by the amount of utilization and be transferred from Other into Oil and gas properties.
In January 2010, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) guidance on oil and gas reserve estimation and disclosures. This guidance amends previous FASB guidance on oil and gas extractive activities to align the accounting requirements with the Securities and Exchange Commissions final rule, Modernization of the Oil and Gas Reporting Requirements issued on December 31, 2008. In summary, the revisions in this guidance modernize the disclosure rules to better align with current industry practices and expand the disclosure requirements for equity method investments so that more useful information is provided. More specifically, the main provisions include the following:
| An expanded definition of oil and gas producing activities to include nontraditional resources such as bitumen extracted from oil sands. |
| The use of an average of the first-day-of-the-month price for the 12-month period, rather than a year-end price for determining whether reserves can be produced economically. |
| Amended definitions of key terms such as reliable technology and reasonable certainty which are used in estimating proved oil and gas reserve quantities. |
| A requirement for disclosing separate information about reserve quantities and financial statement amounts for geographical areas representing 15 percent or more of proved reserves. |
10
Table of Contents
| Clarification that an entitys equity investments must be considered in determining whether it has significant oil and gas activities and a requirement to disclose equity method investments in the same level of detail as is required for consolidated investments. |
The new rules are considered a change in accounting principle that is inseparable from a change in accounting estimate, which does not require retroactive revision. This change in accounting principle has had a material effect on the consistency of the Companys oil and gas reserve estimates, supplemental disclosures, the calculation of DD&A and the full-cost ceiling test. At June 30, 2011, the Companys ceiling test computation did not result in a write-down and was based on twelve-month average prices of $88.44 per barrel of oil and $4.19 per MMBtu of natural gas. At December 31, 2010, the Companys ceiling test computation did not result in a write-down and was based on twelve-month average prices of $75.96 per barrel of oil and $4.38 per MMBtu of natural gas.
There are certain related party entities that are joint interest and revenue partners in certain of the Companys properties. See Note 9 for further information.
Hedging Activities
The Companys revenues are primarily the result of sales of its oil and natural gas production. Market prices of oil and natural gas may fluctuate and affect operating results. The Company engages in hedging activities that primarily include the use of floors, costless collars and futures transactions in order to minimize the downside risk from adverse price movements but allow for the realization of upside profits, if available. Costs and any benefits derived from the effective hedge portions of these activities are reflected in revenues from oil and gas production.
The Company follows the provisions of FASB guidance related to accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. This guidance requires all derivatives to be reported as assets or liabilities at their fair values, and the balance-sheet caption Commodity Derivatives is being used in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets for this purpose. This guidance also imposes additional documentation requirements in order for derivatives to be accounted for as hedges of future risks. The Company designated all new commodity derivative instruments entered into in 2011 and 2010 as hedges for accounting purposes, so the related unrealized changes in their fair values are reported net of tax in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as a component of other comprehensive income. Any hedge ineffectiveness (which represents the amount by which the change in fair value of the derivative exceeds the change in cash flows of the forecasted transaction) is recorded in current-period earnings in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations in Derivative income. Hedge ineffectiveness of actual monthly settlements is recorded as hedging (losses) gains in Gas sales and Oil sales in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations. During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the amounts of other comprehensive income related to hedge transactions that settled and were recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations were $1.8 million and $7.4 million, respectively, net of tax effects. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the amounts of other comprehensive income (loss) related to hedge transactions that settled and were recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations were a loss of $4.7 million and income of $4.1 million, respectively, net of tax effects. The Company anticipates the amount of other comprehensive loss related to hedge transactions that will settle during the next twelve months and be recorded in the 2011 and 2012 consolidated statements of operations will be $124,000, net of tax effects.
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations
In accordance with the provisions of FASB guidance related to accounting for asset retirement obligations and FASB guidance on accounting for conditional asset retirement obligations, costs associated with the retirement of fixed assets (e.g., oil and gas production facilities, etc.) that the Company is legally obligated to incur are accrued. The fair value of the obligation is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the fixed asset and are depreciated over the life of the applicable asset. The asset retirement cost recorded in Oil and gas properties being amortized at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $19.7 million and $18.8 million, respectively. Accretion of the discounted asset retirement obligations is recognized as an increase in the carrying amount of the liability and as an expense within depreciation, depletion and amortization on the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.
11
Table of Contents
The change in the Companys asset retirement obligations (ARO) is set forth below:
In thousands | ||||
Balance of ARO as of January 1, 2011 |
$ 23,352 | |||
Accretion expense |
404 | |||
Additions |
968 | |||
Settlement of ARO |
- | |||
Changes in ARO estimate |
24 | |||
|
|
|||
Balance of ARO as of June 30, 2011 |
$ 24,748 | |||
|
|
Operating Segments
The Company operates in one business segment the exploration, development and sale of oil and gas.
Subsequent events
Management has reviewed subsequent events through the filing date. See Note 13 for additional information regarding a subsequent event.
New Accounting Pronouncements
ASU Number 2011-5 was issued in June 2011, amending Topic 220 - Comprehensive Income. The ASU modifies alternative presentation standards, eliminating the option for disclosure of the elements of other comprehensive income within the statement of stockholders equity. Adoption of this ASU by the Company will change our existing presentation, but will not impact the components of other comprehensive income. The ASU is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011.
3. | Fair Value Measurements |
FASB guidance establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements. The hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date.
| Level 1 Valuation is based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
| Level 2 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or other inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. |
| Level 3 Valuation is based upon other unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value measurements. |
The classification of fair value measurements within the hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Companys commodity derivative contracts were recorded at fair value. The fair values of these instruments were measured using valuations based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets (Level 2) and are valued by reference to similar financial instruments, adjusted for credit risk and restrictions and other terms specific to the contracts.
12
Table of Contents
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
||||||||
Description | June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | ||||||
In thousands | ||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||
Fair value of commodity derivatives - current assets |
$ | 2,669 | $ | 9,377 | ||||
Fair value of commodity derivatives - long-term assets |
611 | 263 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 3,280 | $ | 9,640 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Fair value of commodity derivatives - current liabilities |
$ | (2,479) | $ | (1,973) | ||||
Fair value of commodity derivatives - long-term liabilities |
(610) | (861) | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total Liabilities |
$ | (3,089) | $ | (2,834) | ||||
|
|
4. | Accounts and Revenues Receivable |
Accounts and revenues receivable at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $31.9 million and $44.1 million, respectively, all of which were due from companies in the oil and gas industry. Of the revenues receivable, $28.2 million was due from six companies and $19.7 million was due from five companies at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Since all of RAAM Globals accounts receivable from purchasers and joint interest owners at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 resulted from sales of crude oil, condensate, natural gas and/or joint interest billings to third-party companies in the oil and gas industry, this concentration of customers and joint interest owners may impact the Companys overall credit risk, either positively or negatively, in that these entities may be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. Management believes that allowances for doubtful accounts were adequate to absorb estimated losses as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Management obtains letters of credit from its major purchasers and continually evaluates the creditworthiness of its partners.
5. | Commodity Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
In order to manage the variability in cash flows associated with the sale of its oil and gas production, the Company has developed a strategy to combine the use of floors, costless collars and futures transactions in order to minimize the downside risk from adverse price movements but allow for the realization of upside profits, if available. The use of derivatives involves the risk that the counterparties to such instruments will be unable to meet the financial terms of those contracts. Our derivative contracts are with multiple counterparties to minimize our exposure to any individual counterparty.
With respect to any collar transaction, the counterparty is required to make a payment to the Company if the settlement price for any settlement period is below the floor price for such transaction, and the Company is required to make payment to the counterparty if the settlement price for any settlement period is above the ceiling price of such transaction. For any particular floor contract, the counterparty is required to make a payment to the Company if the settlement price for any settlement period is below the floor price for such transaction. The Company is not required to make any payment in connection with the settlement of a floor contract. Monthly settlements of these contracts are reflected in revenue from oil and gas production.
All of the Companys commodity derivative transactions are settled based on reported settlement prices on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX). The estimated fair value of these transactions is based on various factors
13
Table of Contents
that include closing exchange prices on the NYMEX, over-the-counter quotations, volatility and the time value of options. The calculation of the fair value of collars and floors utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Since these transactions were designated as hedges, the Company is required to record the changes in fair value of these transactions as Other Comprehensive Income in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets with the ineffective portion of the change in fair value reported as Derivative (income) expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. See Note 2, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies, for additional information on the Companys hedging activities.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company realized a net increase in oil and gas revenues related to hedging transactions of approximately $939,000 and $6.7 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company realized a net increase in oil and gas revenues related to hedging transactions of approximately $14.8 million and $25.9 million, respectively. Hedge ineffectiveness was $(436,000) and $(231,000) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Hedge ineffectiveness was $1.8 million for 2010.
As of June 30, 2011, the Company held the commodity derivative instruments shown below related to the forecasted sale of its U.S. Gulf Coast natural gas production for 2011, 2012 and 2013:
Volume in | NYMEX | |||||||
Contract | MMBtus/ | Strike | ||||||
Remaining Contract Term | Type | Month | Price | |||||
July 2011 - August 2011 |
Put | 250,000 | $ 6.50 | |||||
July 2011 - December 2011 |
Swap | 100,000 | $ 6.24 | |||||
July 2011 - October 2011 |
Swap | 92,250 | $ 4.60 | |||||
July 2011 - October 2011 |
Swap | 92,250 | $ 4.80 | |||||
July 2011 - October 2011 |
Swap | 153,750 | $ 4.50 | |||||
July 2011 - December 2011 |
Swap | 100,000 | $ 6.33 | |||||
November 2011 - December 2011 |
Swap | 91,500 | $ 4.85 | |||||
November 2011 - December 2011 |
Swap | 91,500 | $ 4.85 | |||||
November 2011 - February 2012 |
Call | 151,250 | $ 5.60 | |||||
November 2011 - February 2012 |
Put | 151,250 | $ 5.00 | |||||
November 2011 - February 2012 |
Put | 151,250 | $ 4.00 | |||||
January 2012 - February 2012 |
Swap | 100,000 | $ 6.24 | |||||
January 2012 - February 2012 |
Swap | 100,000 | $ 6.33 | |||||
January 2012 - December 2012 |
Swap | 61,000 | $ 5.05 | |||||
January 2012 - December 2012 |
Swap | 61,000 | $ 5.00 | |||||
March 2012 - December 2012 |
Put | 153,000 | $ 3.75 | |||||
March 2012 - December 2012 |
Put | 153,000 | $ 5.00 | |||||
March 2012 - December 2012 |
Call | 153,000 | $ 6.15 | |||||
January 2013 - December 2013 |
Swap | 152,083 | $ 5.40 |
14
Table of Contents
As of June 30, 2011, the Company held the commodity derivative instruments shown below related to the forecasted sale of its U.S. Gulf Coast oil production for 2011 and 2012:
Remaining Contract Term | Contract
Type |
Volume in
BBls/
Month |
NYMEX
Strike
Price |
|||||||
July 2011 - December 2011 |
Swap | 6,000 | $ | 86.76 | ||||||
July 2011 - December 2011 |
Swap | 6,000 | $ | 85.70 | ||||||
July 2011 - December 2011 |
Swap | 10,000 | $ | 85.25 | ||||||
July 2011 - December 2011 |
Swap | 8,000 | $ | 88.20 | ||||||
July 2011 - December 2011 |
Swap | 9,000 | $ | 85.50 | ||||||
January 2012 - March 2012 |
Swap | 10,000 | $ | 89.00 | ||||||
January 2012 - March 2012 |
Swap | 8,000 | $ | 88.24 | ||||||
January 2012 - March 2012 |
Swap | 6,000 | $ | 86.80 | ||||||
January 2012 - December 2012 |
Put | 3,660 | $ | 110.00 | ||||||
April 2012 - June 2012 |
Swap | 6,000 | $ | 88.52 | ||||||
April 2012 - June 2012 |
Swap | 6,000 | $ | 87.05 | ||||||
April 2012 - June 2012 |
Swap | 5,000 | $ | 87.50 | ||||||
July 2012 - September 2012 |
Swap | 12,000 | $ | 88.76 | ||||||
July 2012 - September 2012 |
Swap | 5,000 | $ | 87.80 |
Additional information regarding derivatives can be referenced in Note 3, Fair Value Measurements.
6. | Debt |
2015 Senior Secured Notes
On September 24, 2010, we completed an offering of $150.0 million senior secured notes at a coupon rate of 12.50% (the 2015 Senior Secured Notes) with a maturity date of October 1, 2015. The interest on the notes will be payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing on April 1, 2011, to holders of record at the close of business on the preceding March 15 or September 15. Interest on the notes will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months. The notes were sold at 99.086% of their face amount and were recorded at their discounted amount, with the discount to be amortized over the life of the notes. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the offering to repay all outstanding indebtedness under the revolving credit facility and intends to use the remainder of the proceeds for funding a portion of the planned capital expenditures for development and drilling during 2011. As of June 30, 2011, $150.0 million notional amount of the 2015 Senior Secured Notes was outstanding. The carrying amount of the 2015 Senior Secured Notes was $148.8 million as of June 30, 2011.
The 2015 Senior Secured Notes are guaranteed on a senior secured basis by each of our existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee indebtedness under our Amended Revolving Credit Facility. The 2015 Senior Secured Notes and the guarantees are secured by a security interest in substantially all of our and our existing future domestic subsidiaries (other than certain future unrestricted subsidiaries) assets to the extent they constitute collateral under our Amended Revolving Credit Facility, subject to certain exceptions. Pursuant to an Intercreditor Agreement, the lien securing the notes is subordinated and junior to liens securing our Amended Revolving Credit Facility.
Amended Revolving Credit Facility
On September 24, 2010, an amendment to the Companys Revolving Credit Facility established a new borrowing
15
Table of Contents
base of $62.5 million which was undrawn at June 30, 2011. The Credit Agreement governing the amended revolving credit facility includes covenants restricting certain of the Companys financial ratios, including its current ratio and a debt coverage ratio, and a limitation on general and administrative expenses. The covenants also include limitations on borrowings, investments, and distributions.
Promissory Note
The Company has a promissory note with GE Commercial Finance Business Property Corporation (GECF) with a balance of $2.9 million at June 30, 2011 related to the construction of the Houston office building. The GECF note requires monthly installments of principal and interest in the amount of $27,000 until September 1, 2025. There are no covenant requirements under this note.
Finance Agreement
During May 2011, the Company entered into an agreement to finance the premiums for its annual insurance policies with Imperial Credit Corporation. The finance agreement requires monthly installments of principal and interest in the amount of $0.9 million until February 1, 2012. There are no covenant requirements under this agreement.
7. | Income Taxes |
The Income tax provision for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $9.4 million or an effective tax rate of 47.1%, compared to $10.5 million or an effective tax rate of 36.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The Income tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $12.0 million or an effective tax rate of 36.4%, compared to $17.2 million or an effective tax rate of 36.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The difference in these rates for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 was primarily due to changes in the expected annual financial results, which affected both the federal and state annualized tax rates.
8. | Shareholders Equity |
During 2011, dividends were paid at $25.00 per share to shareholders of record as of March 1, 2011 and June 15, 2011. During 2010, dividends were paid at $25.00 per share to shareholders of record effective March 15, 2010 and June 15, 2010.
9. | Related-Party Transactions |
There are certain related party entities that are joint interest and revenue partners in certain of the Companys properties. Amounts due from such related parties of approximately $912,000 and $734,000 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, are included in Accounts receivable in the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheets and represent joint interest owner receivables. Amounts due to such related parties of $7.2 million and $4.5 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, are included in Revenues payable in the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheets and represent revenue owner payables.
10. | Commitments and Contingencies |
The Company has been named as a defendant in certain lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of the lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not expect that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the financial position, cash flows or results of operations of the Company.
16
Table of Contents
11. | Other Comprehensive Income |
The Company had Other comprehensive income of $12.1 million and $7.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company had Other comprehensive income of $15.1 million and $24.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
12. | Condensed Consolidating Financial Information |
The following condensed consolidating financial information is presented in accordance with SEC regulation S-X requirements relating to multiple subsidiary guarantors of securities issued by the parent company of those subsidiaries. During 2010, RAAM Global issued the 2015 Senior Secured Notes, described in Note 6, Debt. Each of RAAM Globals wholly owned subsidiaries are guarantors of these notes. The guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several.
The following tables present condensed consolidating balance sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, condensed consolidating statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements herein.
17
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
At June 30, 2011
RAAM Global Energy Company |
Subsidiary Guarantors |
Non-guarantor VIEs |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 35,931 | $ | 35,272 | $ | 18 | $ | | $ | 71,221 | ||||||||||
Receivables, net |
2,955 | 40,311 | 245 | (8,579) | 34,932 | |||||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives current portion |
| 2,669 | | | 2,669 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaids and other current assets |
1,614 | 12,436 | | | 14,050 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
40,500 | 90,688 | 263 | (8,579) | 122,872 | |||||||||||||||
Net oil and gas properties |
51,823 | 411,530 | 13,653 | | 477,006 | |||||||||||||||
Total other assets |
33,678 | 284,742 | | (290,067) | 28,353 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 126,001 | $ | 786,960 | $ | 13,916 | $ | (298,646) | $ | 628,231 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Payables and accrued liabilities |
$ | 5,809 | $ | 39,939 | $ | 8,527 | $ | (8,579) | $ | 45,696 | ||||||||||
Advances from joint interest partners |
| 909 | | | 909 | |||||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives - current portion |
| 2,479 | | | 2,479 | |||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligations - current portion |
| 2,406 | | | 2,406 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt current portion |
124 | 6,266 | | | 6,390 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes current portion |
| 797 | | | 797 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
5,933 | 52,796 | 8,527 | (8,579) | 58,677 | |||||||||||||||
Other liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
| 610 | | | 610 | |||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligations |
874 | 21,220 | 248 | | 22,342 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
2,787 | | | | 2,787 | |||||||||||||||
Senior secured notes |
148,781 | | | | 148,781 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
5,198 | 92,493 | 1,411 | | 99,102 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total other liabilities |
157,640 | 114,323 | 1,659 | | 273,622 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
163,573 | 167,119 | 10,186 | (8,579) | 332,299 | |||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
| | 20,956 | | 20,956 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
(37,572) | 619,841 | (17,226) | (290,067) | 274,976 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 126,001 | $ | 786,960 | $ | 13,916 | $ | (298,646) | $ | 628,231 | ||||||||||
|
|
18
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
At December 31, 2010
RAAM Global Energy Company |
Subsidiary Guarantors |
Non-guarantor VIEs |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 45,683 | $ | 35,320 | $ | 29 | $ | | $ | 81,032 | ||||||||||
Receivables, net |
3,491 | 52,019 | 528 | (8,968) | 47,070 | |||||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives current portion |
| 9,377 | | | 9,377 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaids and other current assets |
1,724 | 6,260 | | | 7,984 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
50,898 | 102,976 | 557 | (8,968) | 145,463 | |||||||||||||||
Net oil and gas properties |
55,808 | 370,000 | 11,142 | | 436,950 | |||||||||||||||
Total other assets |
34,444 | 270,496 | | (290,067) | 14,873 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 141,150 | $ | 743,472 | $ | 11,699 | $ | (299,035) | $ | 597,286 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Payables and accrued liabilities |
$ | 6,423 | $ | 37,490 | $ | 8,448 | $ | (8,968) | $ | 43,393 | ||||||||||
Commodity derivatives - current portion |
| 1,973 | | | 1,973 | |||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligations - current portion |
| 2,406 | | | 2,406 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt current portion |
110 | 1,002 | | | 1,112 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes current portion |
| 1,810 | | | 1,810 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
6,533 | 44,681 | 8,448 | (8,968) | 50,694 | |||||||||||||||
Other liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity derivatives |
| 861 | | | 861 | |||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligations |
872 | 19,923 | 151 | | 20,946 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
2,860 | | | | 2,860 | |||||||||||||||
Senior secured notes |
148,681 | | | | 148,681 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
5,198 | 84,827 | 845 | | 90,870 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total other liabilities |
157,611 | 105,611 | 996 | | 264,218 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
164,144 | 150,292 | 9,444 | (8,968) | 314,912 | |||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
| | 2,467 | | 2,467 | |||||||||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
(22,994) | 593,180 | (212) | (290,067) | 279,907 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 141,150 | $ | 743,472 | $ | 11,699 | $ | (299,035) | $ | 597,286 | ||||||||||
|
|
19
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the three months ended June 30, 2011
RAAM Global Company |
Subsidiary Guarantors |
Non- guarantor VIEs |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gas sales |
$ | 254 | $ | 23,904 | $ | 952 | $ | - | $ | 25,110 | ||||||||||
Oil sales |
259 | 24,505 | 983 | - | 25,747 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
513 | 48,409 | 1,935 | - | 50,857 | |||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Production and delivery costs |
97 | 8,672 | 121 | - | 8,890 | |||||||||||||||
Workover costs |
- | 747 | 39 | - | 786 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
1,703 | 11,908 | 316 | - | 13,927 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
1,138 | 2,821 | 7 | - | 3,966 | |||||||||||||||
Bad debt expense |
- | 770 | - | - | 770 | |||||||||||||||
Derivative income |
- | (292) | - | - | (292) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expense |
2,938 | 24,626 | 483 | - | 28,047 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
(2,425) | 23,783 | 1,452 | - | 22,810 | |||||||||||||||
Other income (expenses): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(2,875) | (74) | - | - | (2,949) | |||||||||||||||
Other, net |
- | (13) | - | - | (13) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total other income (expenses): |
(2,875) | (87) | - | - | (2,962) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes |
(5,300) | 23,696 | 1,452 | - | 19,848 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
2,000 | 6,924 | 430 | - | 9,354 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest |
$ | (7,300) | $ | 16,772 | $ | 1,022 | $ | | $ | 10,494 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest (net of tax) |
- | - | 1,022 | - | 1,022 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to RAAM Global |
$ | (7,300) | $ | 16,772 | $ | | $ | | $ | 9,472 | ||||||||||
|
|
20
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the three months ended June 30, 2010
RAAM Global Energy Company |
Subsidiary Guarantors |
Non-guarantor VIEs |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gas sales |
$ | 301 | $ | 32,894 | $ | 633 | $ | - | $ | 33,828 | ||||||||||
Oil sales |
236 | 20,221 | 595 | - | 21,052 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
537 | 53,115 | 1,228 | - | 54,880 | |||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Production and delivery costs |
97 | 6,737 | 89 | - | 6,923 | |||||||||||||||
Workover costs |
14 | 763 | - | - | 777 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
2,871 | 10,421 | 550 | - | 13,842 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
915 | 2,322 | 16 | - | 3,253 | |||||||||||||||
Derivative income |
- | 515 | - | - | 515 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expense |
3,897 | 20,758 | 655 | - | 25,310 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
(3,360) | 32,357 | 573 | - | 29,570 | |||||||||||||||
Other income (expenses): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(33) | (867) | - | - | (900) | |||||||||||||||
Other, net |
46 | 424 | - | - | 470 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total other income (expenses) |
13 | (443) | - | - | (430) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes |
(3,347) | 31,914 | 573 | - | 29,140 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
10,045 | 496 | - | - | 10,541 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest |
$ | (13,392) | $ | 31,418 | $ | 573 | $ | | $ | 18,599 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest (net of tax) |
- | - | 573 | - | 573 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to RAAM Global |
$ | (13,392) | $ | 31,418 | $ | | $ | | $ | 18,026 | ||||||||||
|
|
21
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the six months ended June 30, 2011
RAAM Global Company |
Subsidiary Guarantors |
Non-guarantor VIEs |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gas sales |
$ | 396 | $ | 47,406 | $ | 1,622 | $ | - | $ | 49,424 | ||||||||||
Oil sales |
469 | 44,828 | 1,609 | - | 46,906 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
865 | 92,234 | 3,231 | - | 96,330 | |||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Production and delivery costs |
215 | 15,915 | 222 | - | 16,352 | |||||||||||||||
Workover costs |
- | 1,177 | 41 | - | 1,218 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
4,155 | 26,015 | 896 | - | 31,066 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
2,568 | 5,769 | 8 | - | 8,345 | |||||||||||||||
Bad debt expense |
- | 770 | - | - | 770 | |||||||||||||||
Derivative income |
- | (539) | - | - | (539) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expense |
6,938 | 49,107 | 1,167 | - | 57,212 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
(6,073) | 43,127 | 2,064 | - | 39,118 | |||||||||||||||
Other income (expenses): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(6,193) | (155) | - | - | (6,348) | |||||||||||||||
Other, net |
184 | (3) | - | - | 181 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total other income (expenses) |
(6,009) | (158) | - | - | (6,167) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes |
(12,082) | 42,969 | 2,064 | - | 32,951 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
2,000 | 9,422 | 588 | - | 12,010 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest |
$ | (14,082) | $ | 33,547 | $ | 1,476 | $ | | $ | 20,941 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest (net of tax) |
- | - | 1,476 | - | 1,476 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to RAAM Global |
$ | (14,082) | $ | 33,547 | $ | | $ | | $ | 19,465 | ||||||||||
|
|
22
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the six months ended June 30, 2010
RAAM Global Energy Company |
Subsidiary Guarantors |
Non-guarantor VIEs |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gas sales |
$ | 684 | $ | 66,697 | $ | 1,206 | $ | - | $ | 68,587 | ||||||||||
Oil sales |
469 | 41,385 | 1,144 | - | 42,998 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
1,153 | 108,082 | 2,350 | - | 111,585 | |||||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Production and delivery costs |
205 | 14,455 | 151 | - | 14,811 | |||||||||||||||
Workover costs |
20 | 2,047 | - | - | 2,067 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
5,631 | 32,811 | 1,100 | - | 39,542 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
1,747 | 4,628 | 16 | - | 6,391 | |||||||||||||||
Derivative income |
- | 309 | - | - | 309 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expense |
7,603 | 54,250 | 1,267 | - | 63,120 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
(6,450) | 53,832 | 1,083 | - | 48,465 | |||||||||||||||
Other income (expenses): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(85) | (1,553) | - | - | (1,638) | |||||||||||||||
Other, net |
66 | 470 | - | - | 536 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total other income (expenses): |
(19) | (1,083) | - | - | (1,102) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes |
(6,469) | 52,749 | 1,083 | - | 47,363 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
10,045 | 7,032 | 137 | - | 17,214 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest |
$ | (16,514) | $ | 45,717 | $ | 946 | $ | | $ | 30,149 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest (net of tax) |
- | - | 946 | - | 946 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to RAAM Global |
$ | (16,514) | $ | 45,717 | $ | | $ | | $ | 29,203 | ||||||||||
|
|
23
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2011
RAAM Global Energy |
Subsidiary Guarantors |
Non-guarantor VIEs |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ | (9,226) | $ | 77,528 | $ | 3,392 | $ | | $ | 71,694 | ||||||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Change in investments between affiliates |
2,498 | (2,498) | | | | |||||||||||||||
Change in advances from joint interest partners |
| 909 | | | 909 | |||||||||||||||
Payment of prepaid drilling expenses |
| (14,000) | | | (14,000) | |||||||||||||||
Additions to oil and gas properties and equipment |
(66) | (69,376) | (3,403) | | (72,845) | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from net sales of oil and gas properties |
| 2,125 | | | 2,125 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
2,432 | (82,840) | (3,403) | | (83,811) | |||||||||||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term borrowings |
| 8,037 | | | 8,037 | |||||||||||||||
Payments on long-term borrowings |
(59) | (2,773) | | | (2,832) | |||||||||||||||
Payment of dividends |
(3,000) | | | | (3,000) | |||||||||||||||
Other |
101 | | | | 101 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(2,958) | 5,264 | | | 2,306 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(9,752) | (48) | (11) | | (9,811) | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
45,683 | 35,320 | 29 | | 81,032 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 35,931 | $ | 35,272 | $ | 18 | $ | | $ | 71,221 | ||||||||||
|
|
24
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2010
RAAM Global Energy Company |
Subsidiary Guarantors |
Non-guarantor VIEs |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ | (13,734) | $ | 68,770 | $ | 2,069 | $ | | $ | 57,105 | ||||||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Change in investments |
| 149 | | | 149 | |||||||||||||||
Change in investments between affiliates |
16,438 | (16,438) | | | | |||||||||||||||
Change in advances from joint interest partners |
| (991) | | | (991) | |||||||||||||||
Additions to oil and gas properties and equipment |
(167) | (26,729) | (2,076) | | (28,972) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
16,271 | (44,009) | (2,076) | | (29,814) | |||||||||||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term borrowings |
| 8,874 | | | 8,874 | |||||||||||||||
Payments on long-term borrowings |
(46) | (12,009) | | | (12,055) | |||||||||||||||
Deferred loan costs |
| 304 | | | 304 | |||||||||||||||
Payment of dividends |
(3,000) | | | | (3,000) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(3,046) | (2,831) | | | (5,877) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(509) | 21,930 | (7) | | 21,414 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
3,190 | 25,681 | 17 | | 28,888 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 2,681 | $ | 47,611 | $ | 10 | $ | | $ | 50,302 | ||||||||||
|
|
13. | Subsequent Events |
Issuance and Sale of Senior Notes
On July 15, 2011, the Company successfully completed the issuance and sale of $50.0 million aggregate principal amount of additional 12.50 % Senior Notes due 2015 (the Notes). The Notes are Additional Notes issued pursuant to the indenture dated as of September 24, 2010, pursuant to which the Company initially issued $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 12.50% Notes, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 15, 2011. The Additional Notes have identical terms, other than the issue date and issue price, and constitute part of the same series as the initially issued notes, although they bear a different CUSIP number than the initially issued notes until they are no longer restricted securities under the Securities Act. The Additional Notes are jointly and severally, and unconditionally, guaranteed on a senior secured basis by all of the Companys current and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee indebtedness under our Amended Revolving Credit Facility.
Interest on the Notes accrues from and including April 1, 2011 at a rate of 12.50% per year. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing on October 1, 2011. The Notes mature on October 1, 2015.
The purchase price for the Notes was 102.50% of their principal amount, plus accrued interest from April 1, 2011. The Company received net proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Notes of approximately $51.7 million, after discounts and estimated offering expenses. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the offering for general corporate purposes.
25
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in our Registration Statement filed with the SEC. Our operating results for the periods discussed may not be indicative of future performance. The following discussion and analysis includes forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with Risk Factors under Item 1A of this report, along with Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements at the beginning of this report, for information about the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to be materially different than our forward-looking statements.
Overview
We are a privately held oil and natural gas exploration and production company engaged in the exploration, development, production and acquisition of oil and gas properties. Our operations are located in the Gulf of Mexico, offshore Louisiana and onshore Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma, California and New Mexico. We focus on the development of both conventional oil and gas plays and unconventional resource plays. Historically, we have successfully developed conventional oil and gas plays in the offshore Gulf of Mexico and onshore Texas and Louisiana. More recently, we have redirected our focus to the acquisition and development of acreage in the shallow oil, tight gas sand and oil shale plays throughout the United States. Since 2007, we have targeted unconventional plays, including tight gas and oil in shale in Oklahoma, California, and New Mexico and have obtained land positions in these plays.
Our assets create a portfolio of production, resources and opportunities that are balanced between long-lived, dependable production and exploration and development opportunities. Current development projects are focused on three main areas: shallow waters offshore, onshore conventional assets in Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma, and unconventional assets in Oklahoma. We have selectively acquired and accumulated a portfolio of oil and gas leases in both oil and gas prone unconventional areas domestically. We plan to continue to augment our Gulf Coast production, increase our proved reserves and the reserve life of our portfolio through the development of these unconventional assets.
Our use of capital for exploration, development and acquisitions allows us to direct our capital resources to what we believe to be the most attractive opportunities as market conditions evolve. We have historically acquired properties that we believe will meet or exceed our rate of return criteria. For acquisitions of properties with additional development, exploitation and exploration potential, we have focused on acquiring properties that we expect to operate so that we can control the timing and implementation of capital spending. In some instances, we have acquired non-operated property interests at what we believe to be attractive rates of return either because they provided a foothold in a new area of interest or complemented our existing operations. We intend to continue to acquire both operated and non-operated properties to the extent we believe they meet our return objectives. In addition, our willingness to acquire non-operated properties in new areas provides us with geophysical and geologic data that may lead to further acquisitions in the same area, whether on an operated or non-operated basis.
Our revenue, profitability and future growth rate depend substantially on factors beyond our control, such as economic, political and regulatory developments as well as competition from other sources of energy. Oil and natural gas prices historically have been volatile and may fluctuate widely in the future. Sustained periods of low prices for oil or natural gas could materially and adversely affect our financial position, our results of operations, the quantities of oil and natural gas reserves that we can economically produce and our access to capital.
The primary factors affecting our production levels are capital availability, the success of our drilling program and our inventory of drilling prospects. In addition, we face the challenge of natural production declines. As initial reservoir pressures are depleted, production from a given well decreases. We attempt to overcome this natural decline primarily through drilling our existing undeveloped reserves. Our future growth will depend on our ability to continue to add reserves in excess of production. Our ability to add reserves through drilling is dependent on our capital resources and can be limited by many factors, including our ability to timely obtain drilling permits and regulatory approvals. Any delays in drilling, completing or connecting our new wells to gathering lines will negatively affect our production, which will have an adverse effect on our revenues and, as a result, cash flow from operations.
26
Table of Contents
We focus our efforts on increasing oil and natural gas reserves and production while controlling costs at a level that is appropriate for longterm operations. Our future cash flows from operations are dependent upon our ability to manage our overall cost structure.
How We Evaluate Our Operations
We use a variety of financial and operational measures to assess our performance. Among these measures are (1) volumes of crude oil and natural gas produced, (2) crude oil and natural gas prices realized, (3) per unit operating and administrative costs and (4) EBITDA. The following table contains financial and operational data for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Three Months Ended June 30 | Six Months Ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2011 |
2010 |
2011 |
2010 |
|||||||||||||
Average daily production: |
||||||||||||||||
Oil (Bbl per day) |
2,860 | 3,069 | 2,691 | 3,227 | ||||||||||||
Natural gas (Mcf per day) |
45,815 | 47,828 | 44,413 | 48,073 | ||||||||||||
Oil equivalents (Boe per day) |
10,496 | 11,041 | 10,093 | 11,239 | ||||||||||||
Average prices: (1) |
||||||||||||||||
Oil ($/Bbl) |
$ | 98.92 | $ | 75.37 | $ | 96.29 | $ | 73.63 | ||||||||
Natural gas ($/Mcf) |
$ | 6.02 | $ | 7.77 | $ | 6.15 | $ | 7.88 | ||||||||
Oil equivalents ($/Boe) |
$ | 53.25 | $ | 54.62 | $ | 52.73 | $ | 54.85 | ||||||||
Production expense ($/Boe) |
$ | 9.31 | $ | 6.89 | $ | 8.95 | $ | 7.28 | ||||||||
General and administrative expense ($/Boe) |
$ | 4.15 | $ | 3.24 | $ | 4.57 | $ | 3.14 | ||||||||
EBITDA (2) (in thousands) |
$ | 35,779 | $ | 43,372 | $ | 69,003 | $ | 87,690 | ||||||||
Net income (in thousands) |
$ | 9,472 | $ | 18,026 | $ | 19,465 | $ | 29,203 |
(1) | Average prices presented give effect to our hedging. Please see Oil and Gas Hedging for a discussion of our hedging activities. |
(2) | EBITDA as used herein represents net income before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization. We present EBITDA because some investors believe it is an important supplemental measure of our performance, frequently used in evaluating companies in our industry. EBITDA is not a measurement of our financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating income or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP or as an alternative to net cash provided by operating activities as a measure of our profitability or liquidity. EBITDA has significant limitations, including that it does not reflect our cash requirements for capital expenditures, contractual commitments, working capital or debt service. In addition, other companies may calculate EBITDA differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures. |
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income as determined in accordance with GAAP to EBITDA for the periods indicated.
Three Months Ended June 30 | Six Months Ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2011 |
2010 |
2011 |
2010 |
|||||||||||||
In thousands |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 9,472 | $ | 18,026 | $ | 19,465 | $ | 29,203 | ||||||||
Interest expense |
3,026 | 963 | 6,462 | 1,731 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
13,927 | 13,842 | 31,066 | 39,542 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes |
9,354 | 10,541 | 12,010 | 17,214 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 35,779 | $ | 43,372 | $ | 69,003 | $ | 87,690 | ||||||||
|
|
27
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the unaudited results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 in thousands.
Three Months Ended June 30 | Six Months Ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2011 |
2010 |
2011 |
2010 |
|||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Gas sales |
$ 25,110 | $ | 33,828 | $ | 49,424 | $ | 68,587 | |||||||||
Oil sales |
25,747 | 21,052 | 46,906 | 42,998 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
50,857 | 54,880 | 96,330 | 111,585 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Production and delivery costs |
8,890 | 6,923 | 16,352 | 14,811 | ||||||||||||
Workover costs |
786 | 777 | 1,218 | 2,067 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
13,927 | 13,842 | 31,066 | 39,542 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
3,966 | 3,253 | 8,345 | 6,391 | ||||||||||||
Bad debt expense |
770 | | 770 | | ||||||||||||
Derivative income |
(292) | 515 | (539) | 309 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total operating expense |
28,047 | 25,310 | 57,212 | 63,120 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
22,810 | 29,570 | 39,118 | 48,465 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expenses): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(2,949) | (900) | (6,348) | (1,638) | ||||||||||||
Other, net |
(13) | 470 | 181 | 536 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total other income (expenses): |
(2,962) | (430) | (6,167) | (1,102) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Income before taxes |
19,848 | 29,140 | 32,951 | 47,363 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
9,354 | 10,541 | 12,010 | 17,214 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income including noncontrolling interest |
$ 10,494 | $ | 18,599 | $ | 20,941 | $ | 30,149 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest (net of tax) |
1,022 | 573 | 1,476 | 946 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to RAAM Global |
$ 9,472 | $ | 18,026 | $ | 19,465 | $ | 29,203 | |||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Revenues
Oil and natural gas production. Oil and natural gas production for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was flat as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010 at 1.0 MMBoe for both periods. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, new discoveries in the Yegua area onshore Texas were offset by normal declines in production in the more mature fields of West Cameron in the federal waters.
Total revenues. Total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 decreased to $50.9 million from $54.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in revenue was mainly attributable to lower hedged gas production coupled with lower hedged gas prices. The decrease in gas hedged revenues was partially offset by the increase in oil prices. The average sales price for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $53.25 per Boe as compared to $54.62 per Boe for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
28
Table of Contents
Operating costs and expenses
Production and delivery costs. Production and delivery costs increased to $8.9 million, or $9.31 per Boe, for the three months ended June 30, 2011, up from $6.9 million, or $6.89 per Boe, for the comparable period in 2010. The increase in production and delivery costs was primarily attributable to more repair and maintenance costs and enhanced regulatory and compliance efforts required on our platforms.
Workover costs. Our workover costs for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased slightly to $786,000, or $0.82 per Boe, from $777,000 in the comparable period of 2010, or $0.77 per Boe. The slight increase in workover costs from the comparable period in 2010 was primarily a result of changes in projects needed to manage our wells and maintain efficient production levels.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization. Depreciation, depletion and amortization for the three months ended June 30, 2011 remained flat at $13.9 million as compared to $13.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expense increased to $4.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011, from $3.3 million in the comparable period in 2010. The increase in general and administrative expense resulted principally from higher salaries and office rent due to the establishment of a Denver office location, increased consultant compensation for the use of more specialized consultants on technical projects and additional accounting and legal fees incurred for regulatory compliance matters pursuant to the registration of our Senior Notes.
Bad debt expense. Bad debt expense increased to $0.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011, from zero in the comparable period in 2010. This increase is due to an analysis indicating that amounts owed to the Company by one customer are anticipated to be uncollectible.
Interest expense. Net interest expense increased to $2.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, from $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 due to higher balances and interest rates associated with the outstanding debt during the 2011 period. Debt balances averaged $150.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $110.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2010. Interest rates averaged 12.50% during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 3.55% during the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Income tax provision. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded income tax expense of $9.4 million as compared to income tax expense of $10.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Income tax expense recognized was based on an effective tax rate calculation of 47.13% at June 30, 2011 and 36.18% at June 30, 2010. The tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased as a result of changes to the expected annual financial results, which affected both the federal and state annualized tax rates.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Revenues
Oil and natural gas production. Oil and natural gas production for the six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased to 1.8 MMBoe from 2.0 MMBoe for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in production during the period was mainly due to pipeline shut-ins at the Breton Sound 53 field during the first quarter of 2011. Other decreases were due to normal production declines which were offset by the production from new discoveries during the second quarter of 2011.
Total revenues. Total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased to $96.3 million from $111.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in revenue was mainly attributable to lower production and lower gas prices which was partially reduced by the increase in second quarter oil prices. The average sales price for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $52.73 per Boe as compared to $54.85 per Boe for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Operating costs and expenses
Production and delivery costs. Production and delivery costs increased to $16.4 million, or $8.95 per Boe, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, up from $14.8 million, or $7.28 per Boe, for the comparable period in 2010. The increase in production and delivery costs was primarily attributable to more repair and maintenance costs and enhanced regulatory and compliance efforts required on our platforms.
29
Table of Contents
Workover costs. Our workover costs for the six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased to $1.2 million, or $0.67 per Boe, from $2.1 million in the comparable period of 2010, or $1.02 per Boe. The decrease in workover costs from the comparable period in 2010 was primarily a result of changes in projects needed to manage our wells and maintain efficient production levels.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization. Depreciation, depletion and amortization for the six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased to $31.1 million from $39.5 million in the comparable period in 2010. The decrease in depreciation, depletion, and amortization was caused primarily by a lower amount of amortizable oil and gas properties to deplete at June 30, 2011 and a lower of amount of revenues for the period.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expense increased to $8.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011, from $6.4 million in the comparable period in 2010. The increase in general and administrative expense resulted principally from higher salaries and office rent due to the establishment of a Denver office location, increased consultant compensation for the use of more specialized consultants on technical projects and additional accounting and legal fees incurred for regulatory compliance matters pursuant to the registration of our Senior Notes.
Bad debt expense. Bad debt expense increased to $0.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011, from zero in the comparable period in 2010. This increase is due to an analysis indicating that amounts owed to the Company by one customer are anticipated to be uncollectible.
Interest expense. Net interest expense increased to $6.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, from $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 due to higher balances and interest rates associated with the outstanding debt during the 2011 period. Debt balances averaged $150.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $110.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Interest rates averaged 12.50% during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 3.43% during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Income tax provision. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded income tax expense of $12.0 million as compared to income tax expense of $17.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Income tax expense recognized was based on an effective tax rate calculation of 36.45% at June 30, 2011 and 36.35% at June 30, 2010. Our effective tax rate differs from the statutory federal income tax rate primarily because of state and local income taxes, domestic production activities deductions, and percentage of depletion in excess of basis.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity to date have been capital contributions from shareholders, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, debt financings and cash flows from operations. Our primary use of capital has been for the acquisition, development and exploration of oil and natural gas properties. We continually monitor potential capital sources, including equity and debt financings, in order to meet our planned capital expenditures and liquidity requirements. Our future success in growing proved reserves and production will be highly dependent on our ability to access outside sources of capital.
The Company spent approximately $87 million on capital expenditures during the first six months of 2011. We anticipate spending an additional $188 million on capital expenditures during the remainder of 2011. Our capital budget may be adjusted as business conditions warrant. The amount, timing and allocation of capital expenditures is largely discretionary and within our control. If oil and natural gas prices decline or costs increase significantly, we could defer a significant portion of our budgeted capital expenditures until later periods to prioritize capital projects that we believe have the highest expected returns and potential to generate near-term cash flows. We routinely monitor and adjust our capital expenditures in response to changes in prices, availability of financing, drilling and acquisition costs, industry conditions, the timing of regulatory approvals, the availability of rigs, success or lack of success in drilling activities, contractual obligations, internally generated cash flows and other factors both within and outside our control.
30
Table of Contents
Capital Expenditure Budget
Our total 2011 capital expenditure budget is approximately $275 million, of which approximately $87 million was expended in the first six months of 2011 including $14 million of prepaid drilling and exploration in Oklahoma, which is recorded in Other assets. The remaining capital budget of $188 million consists of:
| $48 million for geological and geophysical costs, including $30 million leasing in two new prospect areas in Colorado and Texas; |
| $21 million for reserve acquisitions; |
| $25 million for Louisiana state water drilling and development prospects; |
| $14 million for onshore drilling and development prospects in Mississippi and Louisiana; |
| $28 million for onshore drilling and development prospects in Texas; |
| $12 million for onshore drilling and development prospects in Oklahoma and California; |
| $28 million for recompletions and platform and infrastructure upgrades for all project areas; and |
| $12 million for plugging and abandonment costs primarily for offshore properties. |
While we have budgeted $188 million for these purposes, the ultimate amount of capital we will expend may fluctuate materially based on market conditions and the success of our drilling results as the year progresses. To date, our 2011 capital budget has been funded from debt financing and our cash flows from operations. We believe our bond proceeds and cash flows from operations should be more than sufficient to fund the remainder of our 2011 capital expenditure budget.
As of June 30, 2011 we had no indebtedness outstanding under our revolving credit facility (the Amended Revolving Credit Facility) and $150 million in 2015 Senior Secured Notes outstanding.
On July 15, 2011, the Company successfully completed the issuance and sale of $50.0 million aggregate principal amount of additional 12.50 % Senior Notes due 2015 (the Notes). Please see Senior Secured Notes later in this section for additional information.
We expect that in the future our commodity derivative positions will help us stabilize a portion of our expected cash flows from operations despite potential declines in the price of oil and natural gas. Please see Part I, Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We actively review acquisition opportunities on an ongoing basis. Our ability to make significant additional acquisitions for cash would require us to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which we may not be able to obtain on terms acceptable to us or at all.
The table below discloses the net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
Six Months Ended June 30 | ||||||||
2011 |
2010 |
|||||||
In thousands |
||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 71,694 | $ | 57,105 | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(83,811) | (29,814) | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
2,306 | (5,877) | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (9,811) | $ | 21,414 | ||||
|
|
31
Table of Contents
Cash flows provided by operating activities
Operating activities provided cash totaling $71.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to cash provided by operations of $57.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in operating cash flows during the six months ended June 30, 2011 was principally attributable to lower accounts payable balances during the period and decreased revenues payable to our partners at June 30, 2011.
Our operating cash flows are sensitive to a number of variables, the most significant of which is the volatility of oil and gas prices. Regional and worldwide economic activity, weather, infrastructure capacity to reach markets and other variable factors significantly impact the prices of these commodities. These factors are beyond our control and are difficult to predict. For additional information on the impact of changing prices on our financial position, see Part I, Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk below.
Cash flows used in investing activities
Investing activities used cash totaling $83.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to cash used in investing of $29.8 million during the comparable period in 2010. Cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased as compared to the same period of 2010 primarily because of increased drilling in Louisiana state waters, the implementation of an active drilling program for its prospects onshore Texas and the $14 million prepayment for Oklahoma drilling expenses.
Our capital expenditures for drilling, development and acquisition costs for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized in the following table (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30 | ||||||||
2011 |
2010 |
|||||||
Project Area |
||||||||
Federal |
$ | 3,662 | $ | 7,828 | ||||
Shallow State Waters |
27,945 | 5,173 | ||||||
Onshore Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi |
32,650 | 9,280 | ||||||
Oklahoma and Mid-Continent |
22,588 | 6,691 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 86,845 | $ | 28,972 | ||||
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
Financing activities provided cash totaling $2.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to cash used by financing activities of $5.9 million during the comparable period in 2010. Cash flows provided by financing activities during the first six months of 2011 consisted primarily of $8.0 million in proceeds from insurance premium financing offset by payments of $5.8 million on borrowings and shareholder dividends. Cash flows used in financing activities during the first six months of 2010 were mainly comprised of $15.1 million in payments on the Companys revolving credit facility, insurance premium note payable and shareholder dividends offset by $8.9 million in proceeds from insurance premium financing.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2011 the Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements or guarantees of third party obligations. The Company has no plans to enter into any off-balance sheet arrangements in the foreseeable future.
Oil and Gas Hedging
As part of our risk management program, we hedge a portion of our anticipated oil and gas production to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices. Reducing our exposure to price volatility helps ensure that we have adequate funds available for our capital programs and more price sensitive drilling programs. Our decision on the quantity and price at which we choose to hedge our future production is based in part on our view of current and future market conditions.
32
Table of Contents
While the use of these hedging arrangements limits the downside risk of adverse price movements, their use also may limit future revenues from favorable price movements. In addition, the use of hedging transactions may involve basis risk. The use of hedging transactions also involves the risk that the counterparties will be unable to meet the financial terms of such transactions. Our derivative contracts are with multiple counterparties to minimize our exposure to any individual counterparty. All of our hedging transactions are settled based upon reported settlement prices on the NYMEX.
At June 30, 2011, on a BOE basis, commodity derivative instruments were in place covering approximately 39% of our projected oil and natural gas sales through 2011, 21% of our projected oil and natural gas sales for 2012 and approximately 12% of our projected oil and natural gas sales for 2013. Approximately 38% of the Companys remaining 2011 gas production, approximately 22% of the Companys 2012 gas production, approximately 18% of the Companys 2013 gas production, approximately 42% of the Companys remaining 2011 oil production and approximately 21% of the Companys 2012 oil production will yield minimum prices under the contracts as discussed in Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial StatementsNote 5. Future oil and gas sales prices on other production will fluctuate according to market conditions. In addition, the results of the Companys planned drilling and development efforts, as well as other changes in costs, expenses and oil and gas production rates, cannot be predicted with certainty. These and many other variables will affect the cash flows available to the Company for future capital expenditures and for debt repayments. Management projects it will have funds available (primarily from its Senior Secured Notes, its cash flows generated from operations, available borrowings under the Credit Agreement and infusion of new equity) to conduct its planned exploration and development program, but it will have to adjust the amount and timing of future expenditures as the availability of funds changes.
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had entered into the following oil derivative instruments:
NYMEX Contract Price | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Futures | Total Options | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Volume in Bbls/Mo | Weighted Average Fixed Price | Volume in Bbls/Mo | Floor | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Period |
||||||||||||||||
2011(1) |
39,000 | $ | 86.21 | | $ | - | ||||||||||
2012(2) |
14,500 | $ | 88.14 | 3,660 | $ | 110.00 |
(1) Average hedged volume is calculated for the remainder of the 2011 year.
(2) The Company currently does not have any volumes hedged for futures in the fourth quarter of 2012. The calculation of average hedged volumes is for the full year of 2012.
33
Table of Contents
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had entered into the following natural gas derivative instruments:
NYMEX Contract Price | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Futures | Total Options | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Volume in Mbtu/Mo | Weighted Average Fixed Price | Volume in Mbtu/Mo | Estimated Price(2) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Period |
||||||||||||||||
2011(1) |
486,500 | $ | 5.33 | 134,167 | $ | 5.95 | ||||||||||
2012 |
155,333 | $ | 5.30 | 152,500 | $ | 5.10 | ||||||||||
2013 |
152,083 | $ | 5.40 | | $ | - |
(1) Average hedged volume is calculated for the remainder of the 2011 year.
(2) For the period remaining in 2011 and 2012, the Company has entered into protective spreads where the price to be realized by the Company is dependent on the NYMEX contract closing price. The Company has estimated the price it will receive based on the closing NYMEX prices as of June 30, 2011.
Each of these transactions were designated as cash flow hedges. Please see Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial StatementsNote 2 included in Part I, Item 1 for additional discussion regarding the accounting applicable to our hedging program.
Senior Secured Notes
On September 24, 2010, we completed an offering of $150.0 million senior secured notes at a coupon rate of 12.50% (the 2015 Senior Secured Notes) with a maturity date of October 1, 2015. The interest on the notes will be payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing on April 1, 2011, to holders of record at the close of business on the preceding March 15 or September 15. Interest on the notes will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months. The notes were sold at 99.086% of their face amount and were recorded at their discounted amount, with the discount to be amortized over the life of the notes. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the offering to repay all outstanding indebtedness under the revolving credit facility and intends to use the remainder of the proceeds for funding a portion of the planned capital expenditures for development and drilling during 2011. As of June 30, 2011, $150.0 million notional amount of the 2015 Senior Secured Notes was outstanding. The carrying amount of the 2015 Senior Secured Notes was $148.8 million as of June 30, 2011.
The 2015 Senior Secured Notes are guaranteed on a senior secured basis by each of our existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee indebtedness under our Amended Revolving Credit Facility. The 2015 Senior Secured Notes and the guarantees are secured by a security interest in substantially all of our and our existing future domestic subsidiaries (other than certain future unrestricted subsidiaries) assets to the extent they constitute collateral under our Amended Revolving Credit Facility, subject to certain exceptions. Pursuant to an Intercreditor Agreement, the lien securing the notes is subordinated and junior to liens securing our Amended Revolving Credit Facility.
On July 15, 2011, the Company successfully completed the issuance and sale of $50.0 million aggregate principal amount of additional 12.50 % Senior Notes due 2015 (the Notes). The Notes are Additional Notes issued pursuant to the indenture dated as of September 24, 2010, pursuant to which the Company initially issued $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 12.50% Notes, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 15, 2011. The Additional Notes have identical terms, other than the issue date and issue price, and constitute part of the same series as the initially issued notes, although they bear a different CUSIP number than the initially issued notes until they are no longer restricted securities under the Securities Act. The Additional Notes are jointly and severally, and unconditionally, guaranteed on a senior secured basis by all of the Companys current and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee indebtedness under our Amended Revolving Credit Facility.
34
Table of Contents
Amended Revolving Credit Facility
Effective as of September 24, 2010, we entered into an amended revolving credit facility (the Amended Revolving Credit Facility). Century Exploration New Orleans, Inc. and Century Exploration Houston, Inc. are the borrowers under our Amended Revolving Credit Facility and the Company, Century Exploration Resources, Inc., Sita Energy LLC and Windstar Energy, LLC guarantee their obligations thereunder. Our Amended Revolving Credit Facility provides for a revolving line of credit in an aggregate principal amount of up to $62.5 million. Loans under the Amended Revolving Credit Facility are denominated in U.S. dollars. Union Bank, N.A. acts as administrative agent and collateral agent for the revolving credit facilities. The Amended Revolving Credit Facility has a two-year maturity.
Borrowings under our Amended Revolving Credit Facility are limited to a borrowing base calculated based on our proved reserves. Borrowings bear interest at a floating rate equal to either the prime rate of interest in effect from time to time (plus a certain percentage in certain circumstances) or LIBOR plus a certain percentage based on the amount of availability under our Amended Revolving Credit Facility. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility.
Our obligations under the Amended Revolving Credit Facility are secured by a lien on substantially all of our and our subsidiaries current and fixed assets (subject to certain exceptions).
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q has been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC applicable to interim financial information. Because this is an interim period filing presented using a condensed format, it does not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP. The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Certain accounting policies involve judgments and uncertainties to such an extent that there is reasonable likelihood that materially different amounts could have been reported under different conditions, or if different assumptions had been used. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
There have been no changes to our critical accounting policies from those disclosed in our Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-172897) filed with the SEC on March 17, 2011.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
ASU Number 2011-5 was issued in June 2011, amending Topic 220 - Comprehensive Income. The ASU modifies alternative presentation standards, eliminating the option for disclosure of the elements of other comprehensive income within the statement of stockholders equity. Adoption of this ASU by the Company will change our existing presentation, but will not impact the components of other comprehensive income. The ASU is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to a variety of market risks including credit risk, commodity price risk and interest rate risk. We address these risks through a program of risk management which may include the use of derivative instruments.
Commodity Price Risk
Our primary market risk exposure is in the pricing applicable to our crude oil and natural gas production. Realized pricing is primarily driven by the prevailing worldwide price for crude oil and spot market prices applicable to our United States natural gas production. Pricing for crude oil and natural gas production has been volatile and unpredictable for several years, and we expect this volatility to continue in the future. The prices we receive for
35
Table of Contents
production depend on many factors outside of our control including volatility in the differences between product prices at sales points and the applicable index price. Based on our average daily production for the six months ended June 30, 2011, our annual revenue would increase or decrease by approximately $16.2 million for each $10.00 per barrel change in crude oil prices and $10.1 million for each $1.00 per MMBtu change in natural gas prices.
To partially reduce price risk caused by these market fluctuations, we hedge a portion of our anticipated crude oil and natural gas production as part of our risk management program. Reducing our exposure to price volatility helps ensure that we have adequate funds available for our capital programs and more price sensitive drilling programs. Our decision on the quantity and price at which we choose to hedge our production is based in part on our view of current and future market conditions. While hedging limits the downside risk of adverse price movements, it also may limit future revenues from favorable price movements. The use of hedging transactions also involves the risk that counterparties, which generally are financial institutions, will be unable to meet the financial terms of such transactions. Our derivative contracts are with multiple counterparties to minimize our exposure to any individual counterparty.
For a further discussion of our hedging activities including a list of the commodity derivatives held by the Company, please see Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Note 3, Fair Value and Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Note 5, Commodity Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities included in this report.
Credit Risk
We monitor our risk of loss due to non-performance by counterparties of their contractual obligations. Our principal exposure to credit risk is through joint interest receivables ($3.2 million at June 30, 2011) and the sale of our crude oil and natural gas production, which we market to energy marketing companies, refineries and affiliates ($28.7 million in receivables at June 30, 2011). Joint interest receivables arise from billing entities who own partial interests in the wells we operate. These entities participate in our wells primarily based on their ownership in leases on which we wish to drill. We can do very little to choose who participates in our wells. In order to minimize our exposure to credit risk we request prepayment of drilling costs where it is allowed by contract or state law. For such prepayments, a liability is recorded and subsequently reduced as the associated work is performed. In this manner, we reduce credit risk. We also have the right to place a lien on our co-owners interest in the well to redirect production proceeds in order to secure payment or, if necessary, foreclose on the interest. Historically, our credit losses on joint interest receivables have been immaterial.
We monitor our exposure to counterparties on crude oil and natural gas sales primarily by reviewing credit ratings, financial statements and payment history. We extend credit terms based on our evaluation of each counterpartys credit worthiness. We have not generally required our counterparties to provide collateral to support crude oil and natural gas sales receivables owed to us.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to changes in interest rates relates primarily to long-term debt obligations. Historically, we were exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of our revolving credit facility and this exposure will remain under our Amended Revolving Credit Facility. No debt was outstanding under the Amended Revolving Credit Facility at June 30, 2011. The majority of our long-term debt obligations consist of the outstanding senior notes, which have a fixed interest rate; therefore, we are not exposed to interest rate risk through these notes and our overall interest rate risk exposure is low. For additional information regarding our Amended Revolving Credit Facility, see Part I, Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis Financial Condition and Results of OperationsAmended Revolving Credit Facility. We do not believe our interest rate exposure warrants entry into interest rate hedges and have, therefore, not hedged our interest rate exposure.
36
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We have evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon the evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. This report does not include a report of managements assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting due to a transition period established by the SEC for newly public companies.
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various pending or threatened legal actions. While management is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these actions, it believes that any ultimate liability arising from these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, because of the inherent uncertainty of litigation, we cannot provide assurance that the resolution of any particular claim or proceeding to which we are a party will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operation or cash flows for the period in which the resolution occurs.
The following risk factors should be read in conjunction with our risk factors described in our registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-172897) filed with the SEC on March 17, 2011. You should carefully consider each of the risks described below and contained in our Form S-4, together with all of the other information contained in the Form S-4 and this report, including our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes. You should also consider the matters addressed under Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements. These risks are not the only risks facing us or that may materially adversely affect our business. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business. If any of these risks develop into actual events, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing could make it more difficult or costly for us to perform fracturing of producing formations and could have an adverse effect on our ability to produce oil and gas from new wells.
Hydraulic fracturing is an important and common practice that is used to stimulate production of hydrocarbons, particularly natural gas, from tight formations. The process involves the injection of water, sand and chemicals under pressure into the formation to fracture the surrounding rock and stimulate production. The process is typically regulated by state oil and gas. However, the EPA recently asserted federal regulatory authority over hydraulic fracturing involving diesel under the Safe Drinking Water Acts Underground Injection Control Program and has begun the process of drafting guidance documents on regulating requirements for companies that plan to conduct hydraulic fracturing using diesel. The White House Council on Environmental Quality is coordinating an administration-wide review of hydraulic fracturing practices, and a number of federal agencies are analyzing a
37
Table of Contents
number of environmental issues associated with hydraulic fracturing. The EPA has commenced a study of the potential environmental effects of hydraulic fracturing activities, with initial results expected to be available by late 2012 and final results by 2014. In addition, the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Government Accountability Office are studying different aspects of how hydraulic fracturing might adversely affect the environment, and the U.S. Department of the Interior is considering disclosure requirements or other mandates for hydraulic fracturing on federal lands. A committee of the United States House of Representatives also has conducted an investigation of hydraulic fracturing practices. These studies, depending on their results, could spur initiatives to regulate hydraulic fracturing under the Safe Drinking Water Act or under newly established legislation. Legislation has been introduced before Congress to provide for federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing and to require disclosure of the chemicals used in the fracturing process. In addition, some states, including Texas, have adopted, and other states are considering adopting, regulations that could restrict hydraulic fracturing in certain circumstances. On June 17, 2011, Texas signed into law a bill that requires, subject to certain trade secret protections, disclosure of information regarding the substances used in the hydraulic fracturing process to the Railroad Commission of Texas and the public. If new laws or regulations that significantly restrict hydraulic fracturing are adopted, such laws could make it more difficult or costly for us to perform fracturing to stimulate production from tight formations. In addition, if hydraulic fracturing is regulated at the federal level, our fracturing activities could become subject to additional permitting requirements, and also to attendant permitting delays and potential increases in costs. Restrictions on hydraulic fracturing could also reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that we are ultimately able to produce from our reserves.
Recently proposed rules regulating air emissions from oil and natural gas operations could cause us to incur increased capital expenditures and operating costs, which may be significant.
On July 28, 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed rules that would establish new air emission controls for oil and natural gas production and natural gas processing operations. Specifically, EPAs proposed rule package includes New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) to address emissions of sulfur dioxide and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and a separate set of emission standards to address hazardous air pollutants frequently associated with oil and natural gas production and processing activities. The EPAs proposal would require the reduction of VOC emissions from oil and natural gas production facilities by mandating the use of green completions for hydraulic fracturing, which requires the operator to recover rather than vent the gas and natural gas liquids that come to the surface during completion of the fracturing process. The proposed rules also would establish specific requirements regarding emissions from compressors, dehydrators, storage tanks and other production equipment. In addition, the rules would establish new leak detection requirements for natural gas processing plants. The EPA will receive public comment and hold hearings regarding the proposed rules and must take final action on them by February 28, 2012. If finalized, these rules could require a number of modifications to our operations including the installation of new equipment. Compliance with such rules could result in significant costs, including increased capital expenditures and operating costs, which may adversely impact our business.
The exhibits required to be filed pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are set forth in the Exhibit Index accompanying this report and are incorporated herein by reference.
38
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
RAAM Global Energy Company |
||||
August 12, 2011 |
By: RAAM Global Energy Company | |||
By: /s/ Jeffrey Craycraft | ||||
Jeffrey Craycraft | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
39
Table of Contents
3.1 |
Certificate of Incorporation of RAAM Global Energy Company, dated November 19, 2003 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Form S-4 filed on March 17, 2011 (File No. 333-172897)). | |
3.2 |
Bylaws of RAAM Global Energy Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the Form S-4 filed on March 17, 2011 (File No. 333-172897)). | |
4.1 |
Indenture, dated as of September 24, 2010, among RAAM Global Energy Company, the several guarantors named therein, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee and collateral agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Form S-4 filed on March 17, 2011 (File No. 333-172897)). | |
4.1.1 |
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 15, 2011, to the Indenture dated September 24, 201, among RAAM Global Energy Company, the several guarantors named therein, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee and collateral agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed on July 19, 2011 (File No. 333-172897)). | |
4.2 |
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of September 24, 2010, among RAAM Global Energy Company, the Guarantor parties named therein and the Initial Purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to the Form S-4 filed on March 17, 2011 (File No. 333-172897)). | |
4.3 |
Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of September 24, 2010, by and among Union Bank, N.A., as administrative agent for the first lien creditors named therein, the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as indenture trustee for the second lien creditors named therein, Century Exploration New Orleans, Inc., Century Exploration Houston, Inc and RAAM Global Energy Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the Form S-4 filed on March 17, 2011 (File No. 333-172897)). | |
4.4 |
Security Agreement, dated September 24, 2010, by RAAM Global Energy Company and the several guarantors name therein in favor of Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee and collateral agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.4 to the Form S-4 filed on March 17, 2011 (File No. 333-172897)). | |
10.1 |
Third Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated March 4, 2011, by and among Century Exploration New Orleans, Inc., Century Exploration Houston, Inc., Union Bank, N.A., individually and as administrative agent, and the lenders party to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 4, 2009 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Form S-4 filed on March 17, 2011 (File No. 333-172897)). | |
10.2 |
Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2011, between RAAM Global Energy Company and Howard A. Settle (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.7 to the Form S-4 filed on March 17, 2011 (File No. 333-172897)). | |
10.3 |
Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2011, between Century Exploration Resources, Inc. and Jonathan B. Rudney (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.8 to the Form S-4 filed on March 17, 2011 (File No. 333-172897)). | |
10.4 |
Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2011, between Century Exploration Houston, Inc. and Wayne L. Adams (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.9 to the Form S-4 filed on March 17, 2011 (File No. 333-172897)). | |
10.5 |
Lease Agreement, dated January 1, 2011, between ATMA Investments, LLC and RAAM Global Energy Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.11 to the Form S-4 filed on March 17, 2011 (File No. 333-172897)). |
40
Table of Contents
31.1 * |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended. | |
31.2 * |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended. | |
32.1 ** |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350). | |
32.2 ** |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350). | |
101* |
Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; (ii) our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; (iii) our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; and (v) the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements. |
* |
Filed herewith. | |
** |
Furnished herewith. | |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
41