ALLIANCE BANKSHARES CORP - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ALLIANCE BANKSHARES CORP	Financial_Report.xls
EX-32 - EX-32 - ALLIANCE BANKSHARES CORP	w83157aexv32.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - ALLIANCE BANKSHARES CORP	w83157aexv31w1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - ALLIANCE BANKSHARES CORP	w83157aexv31w2.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 000-49976

ALLIANCE BANKSHARES CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


VIRGINIA (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		46-0488111 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

14200 Park Meadow Drive, Suite 200 South, Chantilly, Virginia 20151
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(703) 814-7200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No þ

As of August 12, 2011 the number of outstanding shares of registrant’s common stock, par value $4.00 per share was: 5,108,969.

ALLIANCE BANKSHARES CORPORATION

INDEX


	Page
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements		2
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2011 (Unaudited), December 31, 2010, and June 30, 2010 (Unaudited)		2
Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)		3
Consolidated Statements of Income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)		4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)		5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)		6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		65
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		67
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		69
Item 1A. Risk Factors		69
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		71
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		71
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)		71
Item 5. Other Information		71
Item 6. Exhibits		71
SIGNATURES		73
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements
Alliance Bankshares Corporation

Consolidated Balance Sheets

June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)


	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,
	2011			2010			2010
	(unaudited)			(audited)			(unaudited)
ASSETS

Cash and due from banks	$	62,436		$	24,078		$	93,083
Federal funds sold		20,359			17,870			25,238
Trading securities, at fair value		658			2,075			2,250
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value		108,805			135,852			128,907
Restricted stock, at cost		5,565			6,355			6,937
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $5,610, $5,281 and $5,203		315,879			327,029			336,886
Premises and equipment, net		1,644			1,584			1,864
Other real estate owned		4,312			4,627			7,366
Accrued interest and other assets		16,330			19,041			17,029


TOTAL ASSETS	$	535,988		$	538,511		$	619,560



LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

LIABILITIES:
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	130,838		$	124,639		$	158,724
Savings and NOW deposits		57,633			56,569			69,804
Money market deposits		23,933			25,524			27,746
Time deposits		199,628			200,211			230,079

Total deposits		412,032			406,943			486,353

Repurchase agreements, federal funds purchased and other borrowings		33,882			43,153			33,125
Federal Home Loan Bank advances ($26,281, $26,208 and $26,223 at fair value)		41,281			41,208			51,223
Trust Preferred Capital Notes		10,310			10,310			10,310
Other liabilities		2,704			3,212			2,899
Commitments and contingent liabilities		—			—			—

Total liabilities		500,209			504,826			583,910


STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Common stock, $4 par value; 15,000,000 shares authorized; 5,108,969 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and 5,106,819 shares at December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively		20,436			20,427			20,427
Capital surplus		25,854			25,857			25,822
Retained (deficit)		(11,552	)		(12,311	)		(12,712	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net		1,041			(288	)		2,113

Total stockholders’ equity		35,779			33,685			35,650


TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	535,988		$	538,511		$	619,560

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Alliance Bankshares Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share data)


	2011			2010
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans	$	4,555		$	5,228
Investment securities		1,167			1,637
Trading securities		12			49
Federal funds sold		12			11

Total interest income		5,746			6,925

INTEREST EXPENSE:
Savings and NOW deposits		30			55
Time deposits		971			1,468
Money market deposits		45			72
Repurchase agreements, federal funds purchased and other borrowings		52			82
FHLB advances		256			305
Trust preferred capital notes		93			88

Total interest expense		1,447			2,070

Net interest income		4,299			4,855
Provision for loan losses		769			675

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		3,530			4,180

OTHER INCOME:
Deposit account service charges		39			45
Net gain on sale of available-for-sale securities		835			803
Trading activity and fair value adjustments		(130	)		(426	)
Other operating income (loss)		75			(9	)

Total other income		819			413

OTHER EXPENSES:
Salaries and employee benefits		1,404			1,547
Occupancy expense		564			645
Equipment expense		155			185
Other real estate owned expense		16			351
FDIC assessments		290			302
Operating expenses		1,335			1,381

Total other expenses		3,764			4,411

Income before income taxes		585			182
Income tax expense (benefit)		191			(9	)

NET INCOME	$	394		$	191

Net income per common share, basic	$	0.08		$	0.04

Net income per common share, diluted	$	0.08		$	0.04


Weighted average number of shares, basic		5,108,821			5,106,819


Weighted average number of shares, diluted		5,134,153			5,107,788

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Alliance Bankshares Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share data)


	2011			2010
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans	$	9,100		$	10,368
Investment securities		2,488			3,379
Trading securities		45			137
Federal funds sold		22			22

Total interest income		11,655			13,906

INTEREST EXPENSE:
Savings and NOW deposits		62			127
Time deposits		1,968			3,134
Money market deposits		94			151
Repurchase agreements, federal funds purchased and other borrowings		140			206
FHLB advances		515			584
Trust preferred capital notes		185			174

Total interest expense		2,964			4,376

Net interest income		8,691			9,530
Provision for loan losses		1,075			950

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		7,616			8,580

OTHER INCOME:
Deposit account service charges		76			123
Net gain on sale of available-for-sale securities		914			1,059
Trading activity and fair value adjustments		(106	)		(616	)
Other operating income		119			108

Total other income		1,003			674

OTHER EXPENSES:
Salaries and employee benefits		2,796			3,550
Occupancy expense		1,125			1,273
Equipment expense		323			379
Other real estate owned expense		51			394
FDIC assessments		640			665
Operating expenses		2,552			2,697

Total other expenses		7,487			8,958

Income before income taxes		1,132			296
Income tax expense (benefit)		373			(9	)

NET INCOME	$	759		$	305

Net income per common share, basic	$	0.15		$	0.06

Net income per common share, diluted	$	0.15		$	0.06


Weighted average number of shares, basic		5,108,436			5,106,819


Weighted average number of shares, diluted		5,125,151			5,107,737

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Alliance Bankshares Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(Dollars in thousands)


									Accumulated						Total
									Other						Stock-
	Common		Capital			Retained			Comprehensive			Comprehensive			holders’
	Stock		Surplus			(Deficit)			Income (Loss)			Income			Equity
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2009	$	20,427	$	25,835		$	(13,016	)	$	(112	)				$	33,134

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:

Net income		—		—			305			—		$	305			305
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale, net of tax of $1,506		—		—			—			—			2,924			—
Reclassification adjustment, net of income taxes of $(360)		—		—			—			—			(699	)		—

Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—		—			—			2,225			2,225			2,225

Total comprehensive income		—		—			—			—		$	2,530			—

Stock-based compensation expense		—		(13	)		(1	)		—						(14	)


BALANCE, June 30, 2010	$	20,427	$	25,822		$	(12,712	)	$	2,113					$	35,650


BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2010	$	20,427	$	25,857		$	(12,311	)	$	(288	)				$	33,685

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
Net income		—		—			759			—		$	759			759
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale, net of tax of $995		—		—			—			—			1,933			—
Reclassification adjustment, net of income taxes of ($310)		—		—			—			—			(604	)		—

Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—		—			—			1,329			1,329			1,329

Total comprehensive income		—		—			—			—		$	2,088			—

Exercise of stock options		9		(3	)		—			—						6


BALANCE, June 30, 2011	$	20,436	$	25,854		$	(11,552	)	$	1,041					$	35,779

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Alliance Bankshares Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(Dollars in thousands)


	2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	759		$	305
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		622			492
Disposal of fixed assets		15			—
Provision for loan losses		1,075			950
Losses and valuation adjustments on other real estate owned		10			255
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale		—			1,983
Stock-based compensation expense		—			(13	)
Net (gain) on sale of securities available-for-sale		(914	)		(1,059	)
Trading activity and fair value adjustments		106			616
Changes in assets and liabilities affecting operations:
Accrued interest and other assets		1,502			4,052
Other liabilities		(508	)		(33	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		2,667			7,548


CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Net change in federal funds sold		(2,489	)		(22,268	)
Purchase of securities available-for-sale		(26,943	)		(34,636	)
Proceeds from sale/calls of securities available-for-sale		50,430			45,815
Paydowns on securities available-for-sale		6,175			9,221
Net change in trading securities		1,908			5,061
Net change in restricted stock		790			(619	)
Net change in loan portfolio		9,641			14,325
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		739			1,854
Purchase of premises and equipment		(384	)		(169	)

Net cash provided by investing activities		39,867			18,584


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net change in cash realized from (expended on):
Non-interest bearing deposits		6,199			65,878
Savings and NOW deposits		1,064			16,187
Money market deposits		(1,591	)		5,284
Time deposits		(583	)		(32,904	)
Repurchase agreements, federal funds purchased and other borrowings		(9,271	)		(14,165	)
FHLB long term advances issued		—			15,000
FHLB long term advances repaid		—			(15,000	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		6			—

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(4,176	)		40,280


NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		38,358			66,412

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		24,078			26,671


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	62,436		$	93,083

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. General

Alliance Bankshares Corporation (Bankshares or Company) is a bank holding company that conducts substantially all its operations through its subsidiaries. Alliance Bank Corporation (the Bank) is state-chartered and a member of the Federal Reserve System. The Bank places special emphasis on serving the needs of individuals, small and medium size businesses and professional concerns in the greater Washington, D.C. Metropolitan region, primarily in the Northern Virginia submarket.

In March 2001, the Bank formed Alliance Home Funding, LLC (AHF). AHF was a wholly-owned mortgage banking subsidiary of the Bank and originated residential mortgages for subsequent sale. AHF did not retain the servicing rights on mortgages sold. On December 27, 2006, Bankshares announced it would no longer offer mortgage banking operations via AHF. AHF was terminated effective June 27, 2011, and no longer exists. Alliance Bank Mortgage Division (ABMD) was created in 2007 as a division within the Bank.

On June 26, 2003, Alliance Virginia Capital Trust I (Trust), a Delaware statutory trust and a subsidiary of Bankshares was formed for the purpose of issuing Bankshares’ trust preferred debt.

On July 27, 2011, Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (Eagle), Bankshares and the Bank entered into an Agreement of Merger (Merger Agreement), pursuant to which Bankshares will merge with and into Eagle, with Eagle being the surviving corporation, and each share of Bankshares’ outstanding common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.4317 shares of Eagle’s common stock, subject to certain adjustments (Merger). Completion of the Merger is subject to (i) approval of the Merger by the shareholders of Bankshares, (ii) applicable regulatory approvals, including the Federal Reserve Board, the Maryland Department of Financial Regulation and the Virginia State Corporation Commission, and (iii) other customary closing conditions.

Under the Merger Agreement, Bankshares agreed to conduct its business in the ordinary course while the Merger is pending, and, except as permitted under the Merger Agreement, to generally refrain from, among other things, redeeming, purchasing or otherwise acquiring any shares of its capital stock, amending its articles of incorporation or bylaws, soliciting any third party acquisition proposals and entering into any new line of business, without the consent of Eagle.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect the financial condition and results of operations of Bankshares on a consolidated basis and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial reporting. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. In the opinion of management, the

accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments and reclassifications of a normal and recurring nature considered necessary to present fairly Bankshares’ financial position as of June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, the results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The notes included herein should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes included in Bankshares’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).

Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are not necessarily indicative of full year financial results.

Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718-10, “Stock Compensation”, requires companies to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments, such as stock options and nonvested shares, based on the fair value of those awards at the date of grant. Compensation cost has been measured using the fair value of an award on the grant date and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period.

As of June 30, 2011, there was $115 thousand of total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options, which will be recognized over the remaining requisite service period which is estimated to be five years or less.

Stock option compensation expense is the estimated fair value of options granted amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award. The fair value of each grant is estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. There were no grants of stock options for the first six months of 2011.

Stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2011 is summarized below:


						Weighted
				Weighted		Average		Aggregate
				Average		Remaining		Intrinsic
	Number of			Exercise		Contractual		Value¹
	Shares			Price		Life (in years)		(in thousands)
Outstanding at January 1, 2011		500,210		$	10.26
Granted		—			—
Exercised		(2,150	)		2.45
Forfeited		(94,876	)		12.05
Expired		(10,350	)		4.25


Outstanding at June 30, 2011		392,834		$	10.03		4.8	$	—


Exercisable at June 30, 2011		293,334		$	11.71		4.8	$	—


¹		Intrinsic value is the difference between the underlying stock’s price and the strike price. If the difference is negative, the intrinsic value is given as zero.

2. Fair Value Measurements

Bankshares uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), ASC 820-10, the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for Bankshares’ various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

The fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.

Fair Value Hierarchy

In accordance with this guidance, Bankshares groups its financial assets and liabilities generally measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.

	•		Level 1 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

	•		Level 2 — Valuation is based on observable inputs including quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in less active markets, and model-based valuation techniques for which significant assumptions can be derived primarily from or corroborated by observable data in the market.

	•		Level 3 — Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect Bankshares’ own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following describes the valuation techniques used by Bankshares to measure certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the financial statements:

Trading and Available-for-Sale Securities — Trading and available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted market prices, when available (Level 1). If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar securities for which significant assumptions are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data. Third party vendors compile prices from various sources and may determine the fair value of identical or similar securities by using pricing models that consider observable market data (Level 2). Financial assets and liabilities that are traded infrequently have values based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These inputs reflect management’s own view about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (Level 3). As a result, some of Bankshares’ securities are hand priced using customary spreads over similar maturity treasury instruments.

FHLB Advances and Time Deposits — Under the fair value accounting standards, certain liabilities can be carried at fair value. The designated instruments are recorded on a fair value basis at the time of issuance. As of June 30, 2011, Bankshares had one wholesale liability as a fair value instrument: a long-term Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advance.

Wholesale instruments are designated as either Level 2 or Level 3 under the ASC 820-10 fair value hierarchy. Level 2 liabilities are based on quoted market prices using independent valuation techniques for similar instruments with like characteristics. This information is deemed to be observable market data. Level 3 liabilities are financial instruments that are difficult to value due to dysfunctional, distressed markets or lack of actual trading volume. Management gathers certain data to value the instrument. Data include swap curves, option adjusted spreads and discounted cash flows. These data points are modeled to reflect the fair value of the liability.

The following tables present the balances of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:


	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2011
									Total
			Quoted		Significant		Significant		Changes in
			Prices in		Other		Other		Fair Value
			Active		Observable		Unobservable		Included in
	Fair		Markets		Inputs		Inputs		YTD
Description	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Results
	(dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Trading securities — PCMOs	$	658	$	—	$	—	$	658	$	(33	)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. government corporations and agencies		34,208		—		34,208		—		—
U.S. government CMOs		23,282		—		23,282		—		—
U.S. government agency MBS		16,833		—		16,833		—		—
PCMOs		8,884		—		—		8,884		—
Municipal securities		25,598		—		25,598		—		—
Liabilities:
FHLB advances		26,281		—		—		26,281		(73	)

									$	(106	)


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010
									Total
			Quoted		Significant		Significant		Changes in
			Prices in		Other		Other		Fair Value
			Active		Observable		Unobservable		Included in
	Fair		Markets		Inputs		Inputs		2010
Description	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Results
	(dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Trading securities — PCMOs	$	2,075	$	—	$	—	$	2,075	$	(87	)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. government corporations and agencies		51,763		—		25,773		25,990		—
U.S. government CMOs		22,576		—		22,576		—		—
U.S. government agency MBS		14,805		—		14,805		—		—
PCMOs		17,621		—		—		17,621		—
Municipal securities		29,087		—		29,087		—		—
Liabilities:
Brokered certificate of deposit		—		—		—		—		23
FHLB advances		26,208		—		—		26,208		(447	)

									$	(511	)

The following table presents the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements for the three months ended June 30, 2011:


Fair Value Measurements Using
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
(dollars in thousands)
						Available for Sale
	Trading Securities			FHLB Advances		Securities

Beginning balance, March 31, 2011	$	605		$	26,057	$	13,715

Transfers into (out of) Level 3		—			—		—
Sales, maturities or calls		(41	)		—		(4,835	)
Realized gains (losses) on assets		94			—		21
Realized (gains) losses on liabilities		—			224		—
Unrealized gains (losses) on assets		—			—		(17	)


Ending balance, June 30, 2011	$	658		$	26,281	$	8,884

The following table presents the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements for the six months ended June 30, 2011:


Fair Value Measurements Using
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
(dollars in thousands)
						Available for Sale
	Trading Securities			FHLB Advances		Securities

Beginning balance, January 1, 2011	$	2,075		$	26,208	$	43,611
Transfers into (out of) Level 3		—			—		(25,990	)
Sales, maturities or calls		(1,384	)		—		(8,585	)
Realized gains (losses) on assets		(33	)		—		80
Realized (gains) losses on liabilities		—			73
Unrealized gains (losses) on assets		—			—		(232	)


Ending balance, June 30, 2011	$	658		$	26,281	$	8,884

For the assets and liabilities selected for fair value accounting, management obtained pricing on each instrument from independent third parties who relied upon pricing models using widely available and industry standard yield curves. Although there are positive signs in the economy, the market is continuing to act in an unusual manner; therefore, management is continuing to monitor certain instruments using additional inputs as well as implementing its strategy to reduce the fair value portfolio. Changes in fair values associated with fluctuations in market values reported above are reported as trading activity and fair value adjustments on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Certain financial and nonfinancial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The following describes the valuation techniques used by Bankshares to measure certain financial and nonfinancial assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the financial statements:

Impaired Loans. Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. The measurement of loss associated with impaired loans can be based on either the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the underlying collateral, if any. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the collateral is real estate. The value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on

an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over two years old, then the fair value is considered to be Level 3. Impaired loans allocated to the allowance for loan losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan losses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Other Real Estate Owned (OREO). OREO is measured at fair value using an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser using observable market data (Level 2). However, if an appraisal of the real estate property is over two years old, then the fair value is considered to be Level 3.

The following tables summarize Bankshares’ assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the period.


	Carrying Value at June 30, 2011
			Quoted		Significant		Significant
			Prices		Other		Other
			In Active		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Markets		Inputs		Inputs
Description	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
			(dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Impaired loans, net of valuation allowance	$	7,739	$	—	$	7,739	$	—

OREO	$	4,312	$	—	$	4,312	$	—


	Carrying Value at December 31, 2010
			Quoted		Significant		Significant
			Prices		Other		Other
			In Active		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Markets		Inputs		Inputs
Description	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
			(dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Impaired loans, net of valuation allowance	$	3,124	$	—	$	3,124	$	—

OREO	$	4,627	$	—	$	4,627	$	—

The following describes the valuation techniques used by Bankshares to measure certain financial assets and liabilities not previously described in this note that are not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the financial statements:

Cash, Due from Banks, and Federal Funds Sold

For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Loans Receivable

For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for certain mortgage loans (e.g., one-to-four family residential), credit card loans, and other consumer loans are based on quoted market prices of similar loans sold in conjunction with securitization transactions, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics. Fair values for other loans (e.g., commercial real estate and investment property mortgage loans, commercial and industrial loans) are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for nonperforming loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral values, where applicable.

Restricted Stock

Restricted investments in correspondent banks are carried at cost based on the underlying redemption provisions of the instruments and therefore are not included in the fair value disclosures.

Accrued Interest

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.

Deposit Liabilities

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest checking, statement savings, and certain types of money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Short-Term Borrowings

The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings under repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings maturing within ninety days approximate their fair values. Fair values of other short-term borrowings are estimated using

discounted cash flow analyses based on Bankshares’ current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Trust Preferred Capital Notes

The fair value of Bankshares’ Trust Preferred Capital Notes, which are discussed in Note 9, is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on Bankshares’ current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of standby letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date. Fair value of off-balance sheet financial commitments are considered immaterial and are therefore not included in the table below.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table reflects the fair value of financial instruments:


	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
			(dollars in thousands)
Financial assets:

Cash and due from banks	$	62,436	$	62,436	$	24,078	$	24,078
Federal funds sold		20,359		20,359		17,870		17,870
Trading securities		658		658		2,075		2,075
Available-for-sale securities		108,805		108,805		135,852		135,852
Loans, net		315,879		312,884		327,029		324,164
Accrued interest receivable		2,257		2,257		2,758		2,758

Financial liabilities:
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	130,838	$	130,838	$	124,639	$	124,639
Interest bearing deposits		281,194		260,670		282,304		264,176
Short-term borrowings		33,882		33,882		43,153		43,148
FHLB advances		15,000		15,000		15,000		15,000
FHLB advances, at fair value		26,281		26,281		26,208		26,208
Trust Preferred Capital Notes		10,310		10,310		10,310		10,310
Accrued interest payable		1,091		1,091		976		976

3. Trading Securities

The following table reflects trading securities accounted for on a fair value basis and the effective yield of the instruments as of the dates indicated:


	June 30,					December 31,					June 30,
	2011					2010					2010
	Fair					Fair					Fair
	Value		Yield			Value		Yield			Value		Yield
						(dollars in thousands)
Trading securities:
PCMOs	$	658		5.43	%	$	2,075		5.32	%	$	2,250		5.33	%

Total trading securities	$	658		5.43	%	$	2,075		5.32	%	$	2,250		5.33	%

4. Investment Securities

The amortized cost, unrealized holding gains and losses, and the fair value of investment securities at June 30, 2011 are summarized as follows:


	June 30, 2011
	Amortized		Unrealized					Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
			(dollars in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	33,775	$	461	$	(28	)	$	34,208
U.S. government agency CMOs		22,433		854		(5	)		23,282
U.S. government agency MBS		16,401		432		—			16,833
PCMOs		8,675		226		(17	)		8,884
Municipal securities		25,944		546		(892	)		25,598

Total available-for-sale securities	$	107,228	$	2,519	$	(942	)	$	108,805

The amortized cost, unrealized holding gains and losses, and the fair value of investment securities at December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:


	December 31, 2010
	Amortized		Unrealized					Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
			(dollars in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	51,684	$	657	$	(578	)	$	51,763
U.S. government agency CMOs		22,185		596		(205	)		22,576
U.S. government agency MBS		14,587		218		—			14,805
PCMOs		17,180		468		(27	)		17,621
Municipal securities		30,653		201		(1,767	)		29,087

Total available-for-sale securities	$	136,289	$	2,140	$	(2,577	)	$	135,852

There were no held-to-maturity investments at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.

The following tables present the aggregate amount of unrealized loss in investment securities as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The aggregate amount is determined by summation of all the related securities that have a continuous loss at period end, and the length of time that the loss has been unrealized is shown by terms of “less than 12 months” and “12 months or more.” The fair value is the approximate market value as of the period end.


	June 30, 2011
	Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Loss			Value		Loss			Value		Loss
						(dollars in thousands)
U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	5,446	$	(28	)	$	—	$	—			5,446	$	(28	)
U.S. government agency CMOs		2,492		(5	)		—		—			2,492		(5	)
PCMOs		1,043		(17	)		—		—			1,043		(17	)
Municipal securities		8,964		(295	)		2,068		(597	)		11,032		(892	)


Total temporarily impaired investment securities	$	17,945	$	(345	)	$	2,068	$	(597	)	$	20,013	$	(942	)


	December 31, 2010
	Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Loss			Value		Loss			Value		Loss
						(dollars in thousands)
U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	25,195	$	(578	)	$	—	$	—		$	25,195	$	(578	)
U.S. government agency CMOs		7,252		(205	)		—		—			7,252		(205	)
PCMOs		4,103		(27	)		—		—			4,103		(27	)
Municipal securities		19,862		(1,112	)		1,966		(655	)		21,828		(1,767	)


Total temporarily impaired investment securities	$	56,412	$	(1,922	)	$	1,966	$	(655	)	$	58,378	$	(2,577	)

Bankshares’ investment security portfolio is primarily comprised of fixed rate bonds, whose prices move inversely with interest rates. At the end of any accounting period, the portfolio may have both unrealized gains and losses. Unrealized losses within Bankshares’ portfolio typically occur as market interest rates rise. Such unrealized losses are considered temporary in nature. Under ASC 320-10-35, Debt and Equity Securities Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, an impairment is considered “other than temporary” if any of the following conditions are met: Bankshares intends to sell the security, it is more likely than not that Bankshares will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, or Bankshares does not expect to recover the security’s entire amortized cost basis (even if Bankshares does not

intend to sell). In the event that a security would suffer impairment for a reason that was “other than temporary,” Bankshares would be expected to write down the security’s value to its new fair value, and the amount of the write-down would be included in earnings as a realized loss. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, management does not consider any of the unrealized losses to be other-than-temporarily impaired and no impairment charges have been recorded.

There are a total of 24 investment securities totaling $20 million that have an unrealized loss and are considered temporarily impaired as of June 30, 2011. Management believes the unrealized losses noted in the table above are a result of current market conditions and interest rates, and do not reflect on the ability of the issuers to repay the obligations. Approximately $5.4 million or 27.2% of the investment securities with an unrealized loss are backed by U.S. Government Agencies or Corporations and other forms of underlying collateral. The PCMOs amounting to $1.0 million with an unrealized loss are all rated AAA by at least one national rating service. The municipalities have taxing authority and the ability to support their debt. Bankshares does not intend to sell the investments and it is not likely that Bankshares will be required to sell the investments before recovery of the unrealized losses.

Bankshares’ investment in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock totaled $4.2 million at June 30, 2011. FHLB stock is generally viewed as a long term investment and as a restricted investment security which is carried at cost, because there is no market for the stock other than the FHLBs or member institutions. Therefore, when evaluating FHLB stock for impairment, its value is based on ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. Despite the FHLB’s temporary suspension of repurchases of excess capital stock that started in 2009 and ended in 2010, and because the FHLB has shown consistent profitability during 2010 and the first six months of 2011, Bankshares does not consider this investment to be other than temporarily impaired as of June 30, 2011 and no impairment has been recognized. FHLB stock is included in restricted stock on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

5. Loans

The following table summarizes the composition of the loan portfolio by dollar amount and percentage as of the dates indicated:


	June 30,						December 31,
	2011						2010
	Amount			Percentage			Amount			Percentage
				(dollars in thousands)
Real estate:
Residential real estate	$	107,685			33.5	%	$	110,862			33.4	%
Commercial real estate		143,133			44.5	%		146,222			44.0	%
Construction / Land		39,546			12.3	%		43,017			12.9	%

Total real estate		290,364			90.3	%		300,101			90.3	%
Commercial and industrial		27,317			8.5	%		27,517			8.3	%
Consumer		3,808			1.2	%		4,692			1.4	%

Gross loans		321,489			100.0	%		332,310			100.0	%

Less: allowance for loan losses		(5,610	)					(5,281	)

Net loans	$	315,879					$	327,029

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were $54 thousand and $894 thousand, respectively, in checking account overdrafts that were reclassified on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as loans.

The following tables represent the credit quality of loans by class:


					As Of June 30, 2011
	(dollars in thousands)
					Special								Total
INTERNAL RISK RATING GRADES	Pass		Watch		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Loans
Risk Rating Number¹	1 to 5		6		7		8		9		10

Commercial and industrial	$	23,983	$	864	$	719	$	1,736	$	15	$	—	$	27,317
Commercial real estate
Owner occupied		66,506		1,601		789		2,677		—		—		71,573
Non-owner occupied		63,136		2,601		3,883		1,940		—		—		71,560
Construction/land
Residential construction		14,275		—		—		—		536		—		14,811
Other construction & land		15,476		1,837		556		6,530		336		—		24,735
Residential real estate
Equity Lines		29,075		999		—		44		122		—		30,240
Single family		59,066		1,579		3,636		7,770		578		—		72,629
Multifamily		4,816		—		—		—		—		—		4,816
Consumer — non real estate		3,549		259		—		—		—		—		3,808

Totals	$	279,882	$	9,740	$	9,583	$	20,697	$	1,587	$	—	$	321,489


					As Of December 31, 2010
	(dollars in thousands)
					Special								Total
INTERNAL RISK RATING GRADES	Pass		Watch		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Loans
Risk Rating Number¹	1 to 5		6		7		8		9		10

Commercial and industrial	$	24,539	$	437	$	734	$	1,807	$	—	$	—	$	27,517
Commercial real estate
Owner occupied		73,834		634		2,074		3,273		—		—		79,815
Non-owner occupied		59,757		2,732		3,918		—		—		—		66,407
Construction/land
Residential construction		17,483		1,553		—		3,300		872		—		23,208
Other construction & land		7,723		1,633		1,492		8,961		—		—		19,809
Residential real estate
Equity Lines		43,266		958		348		397		—		—		44,969
Single family		45,520		6,627		3,312		5,846		—		—		61,305
Multifamily		4,588		—		—		—		—		—		4,588
Consumer — non real estate		4,501		—		—		191		—		—		4,692

Totals	$	281,211	$	14,574	$	11,878	$	23,775	$	872	$	—	$	332,310


⁽¹⁾		Internal risk ratings of pass (rating numbers 1 to 5) and watch (rating number 6) are deemed to be unclassified assets. Internal risk ratings of special mention (rating number 7), substandard (rating number 8), doubtful (rating number 9) and loss (rating number 10) are deemed to be classified assets.

The following tables set forth aging and non-accrual loans by class:


					Aging and Non-accrual Loans by Class
	As of June 30, 2011
	(dollars in thousands)
											90-days
	30-59				90 Days or						Past Due		Non-
	Days Past		60-89 Days		More Past		Total Past				and Still		accrual
	Due		Past Due		Due		Due		Current		Accruing		Loans

Commerical & Industrial	$	979	$	205	$	—	$	1,184	$	26,133	$	—	$	1,067
Commercial real estate
Owner occupied		2,677		—		15		2,692		68,881				2,692
Non-owner occupied		100		—		408		508		71,052		408		100
Construction/land
Residential construction		—		—		536		536		14,275		—		536
Other construction & land		1,781		180		2,896		4,857		19,878		—		4,033
Residential real estate
Equity Lines		1,114		—		166		1,280		28,960		—		166
Single Family		1,916		1,397		652		3,965		68,664		—		1,927
Multifamily		—		—		—		—		4,816		—		—
Consumer-Non real estate		76		—		—		76		3,732		—		—


Total loans	$	8,643	$	1,782	$	4,673	$	15,098	$	306,391	$	408	$	10,521


					Aging and Non-accrual Loans By Class
	As of December 31, 2010
	(dollars in thousands)
											90-days
					90 Days or						Past Due
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		More Past		Total Past				and Still		Non-accrual
	Past Due		Past Due		Due		Due		Current		Accruing		Loans

Commerical and industrial	$	718	$	—	$	—	$	718	$	26,799	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate
Owner occupied		1,992		—		291		2,283		77,532		—		291
Non-owner occupied		328		—		—		328		66,079		—		—
Construction/land
Residential construction		2,585		—		1,128		3,713		19,495		256		872
Other construcion & land		1,859		1,917		—		3,776		16,033		—		—
Residential real estate
Equity Lines		427		—		—		427		44,541		—		—
Single Family		5,608		—		478		6,086		55,220		—		740
Multifamily		—		—		—		—		4,588		—		—
Consumer -non real estate		—		91		—		91		4,601		—		—


Total loans	$	13,517	$	2,008	$	1,897	$	17,422	$	314,888	$	256	$	1,903

6. Allowance for Loan Losses

The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods presented:


	Six Months			Year			Six Months
	Ended			Ended			Ended
	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,
	2011			2010			2010
				(dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of period	$	5,281		$	5,619		$	5,619
Provision for loan losses		1,075			1,753			950
Loans charged off		(986	)		(2,239	)		(1,408	)
Recoveries of loans charged off		240			148			42

Net (charge-offs)		(746	)		(2,091	)		(1,366	)

Balance, end of period	$	5,610		$	5,281		$	5,203

The following tables represent the allocation of allowance for loan losses by segment as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011
				(dollars in thousands)
	Commercial			Commercial			Construction			Residential
	and Industrial			Real Estate			Land			Real Estate			Consumer			Total

Allowance for Loan Losses:
Beginning Balance:	$	463		$	1,420		$	700		$	2,613		$	85		$	5,281
Charge-offs		(10	)		(158	)		(404	)		(414	)		—			(986	)
Recoveries		116			8			—			114			2			240
Provision		(216	)		265			1,186			(126	)		(34	)		1,075

Ending Balance:	$	353		$	1,535		$	1,482		$	2,187		$	53		$	5,610


Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	217		$	812		$	504		$	—		$	1,533

Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	353		$	1,318		$	670		$	1,683		$	53		$	4,077


Loans:
Ending Balance:	$	27,317		$	143,133		$	39,546		$	107,685		$	3,808		$	321,489


Individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,067		$	2,792		$	4,569		$	2,093		$	—		$	10,521

Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	26,250		$	140,341		$	34,977		$	105,592		$	3,808		$	310,968


	December 31, 2010
					(dollars in thousands)
	Commercial		Commercial		Construction		Residential
	and Industrial		Real Estate		Land		Real Estate		Consumer		Total

Allowance for Loan Losses:
Ending Balance:	$	463	$	1,420	$	700	$	2,613	$	85	$	5,281


Individually evaluated for impairment		—	$	77	$	696	$	100		—	$	873

Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	463	$	1,343	$	4	$	2,513	$	85	$	4,408


Loans:
Ending Balance:	$	27,517	$	146,222	$	43,017	$	110,862	$	4,692	$	332,310


Individually evaluated for impairment		—	$	291	$	3,272	$	740	$	—	$	4,303
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	27,517	$	145,931	$	39,745	$	110,122	$	4,692	$	328,007

Impaired loans and non-accrual loans are summarized as follows as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance	$	1,249	$	306
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance		9,272		3,997

Total impaired loans	$	10,521	$	4,303


Valuation allowance related to impaired loans	$	1,533	$	873

Total loans past due 90 days and still accruing	$	408	$	256


Average investment in impaired loans	$	11,038	$	4,400


Interest income recognized on impaired loans	$	155	$	226

Interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired loans	$	155	$	226

The following tables represent specific allocation for impaired loans by class:


	Specific Allocation for Impaired Loans By Class
	As of June 30, 2011
			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
			(dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance:
Commercial & Industrial	$	1,067	$	1,081	$	—	$	1,022	$	28
Commercial Real Estate
Owner occupied		—		—		—		—		—
Non-owner occupied		100		103		—		104		3
Residential Real Estate		182		184		—		185		5
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial Real Estate
Owner occupied		2,692		2,782		217		2,442		33
Non-owner occupied		—		—		—		—		—
Construction/Land
Residential construction		536		541		150		542		—
Other construction & Land		4,033		4,209		662		4,802		37
Residential Real Estate
Single Family		1,789		1,807		395		1,819		48
Equity Lines		122		122		109		122		1


Total:	$	10,521	$	10,829	$	1,533	$	11,038	$	155


			Specific Allocation for Impaired Loans by Class
	As of December 31, 2010
			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized

	(dollars in thousands)

With no related allowance:
Residential real estate:
Single Family	$	306	$	322	$	—		320	$	9
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate
Owner occupied		291		291		77		293		20
Non-owner occupied		—		—		—		—		—
Construction/Land
Residential		3,272		3,428		696		3,353		197
Commercial		—		—		—		—		—
Residential real estate
Single family		434		457		100		434		—


Total:	$	4,303	$	4,498	$	873	$	4,400	$	226

There were no non-accrual loans excluded from impaired loan disclosures as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. No additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans. At June 30, 2011, there were $749 thousand in troubled debt restructured loans and $212 thousand in troubled debt restructured loans as of December 31, 2010.

7. Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)

The table below reflects changes in OREO for the periods indicated:


	Six Months			Twelve Months			Six Months
	Ended			Ended			Ended
	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,
	2011			2010			2010
				(dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of period	$	4,627		$	7,875		$	7,875
Properties acquired at foreclosure		434			1,973			1,600
Capital improvements on foreclosed properties		—			55			—
Sales of foreclosed properties		(749	)		(4,918	)		(2,109	)
Valuation adjustments		—			(358	)		—


Balance, end of period	$	4,312		$	4,627		$	7,366

The table below reflects expenses applicable to OREO for the periods indicated:


	Six Months		Twelve Months		Six Months
	Ended		Ended		Ended
	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,
	2011		2010		2010
			(dollars in thousands)
Loss on sales of OREO	$	12	$	303	$	255
Valuation adjustments		—		358		—
Operating expenses, net of rental income		39		180		139


Total OREO expense	$	51	$	841	$	394

8. Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

Bankshares has two advances from the FHLB: one fixed rate advance and one floating rate advance.

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the FHLB advance accounted for on a fair value basis had a value of $26.3 and $26.2 million, respectively, and matures in 2021. The weighted average interest rate on the long-term FHLB advance accounted for on a fair value basis was 3.985% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The par value of the FHLB advance accounted for on a fair value basis was $25.0 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there was one FHLB advance accounted for on a cost basis. Bankshares entered into this floating rate advance in the first quarter of 2010 for $15.0 million. The advance matures in 2012 and the interest rate at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was 0.159% and 0.184%, respectively. The weighted average interest rate for both FHLB advances outstanding is 2.550%.

9. Trust Preferred Capital Notes of Subsidiary Trust

On June 30, 2003, Bankshares’ wholly-owned Delaware statutory business trust privately issued $10.0 million face amount of the Trust’s floating rate trust preferred capital securities (Trust Preferred Capital Notes) in a pooled trust preferred capital securities offering. The trust issued $310 thousand in common equity to Bankshares. Simultaneously, the trust used the proceeds of the sale to purchase $10.3 million principal amount of Bankshares’ floating rate junior subordinated debentures due 2033 (Subordinated Debentures). Both the Trust Preferred Capital Notes and the Subordinated Debentures are callable at any time. The Subordinated Debentures are an unsecured obligation of Bankshares and are junior in right of payment to all present and future senior indebtedness of Bankshares. The Trust Preferred Capital Notes are guaranteed by Bankshares on a subordinated basis. The Trust Preferred Capital Notes are presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets of Bankshares under the caption “Trust preferred capital notes.” Bankshares records distributions payable on the Trust Preferred Capital Notes as an interest expense in its Consolidated Statements of Income. The interest rate associated

with the Trust Preferred Capital Notes is three month LIBOR plus 3.15% subject to quarterly interest rate adjustments. Under the indenture governing the Trust Preferred Capital Notes, Bankshares has the right to defer payments of interest for up to twenty consecutive quarterly periods. Beginning with the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and through June 30, 2011, Bankshares elected to defer the interest payments as permitted under the indenture. The interest deferred under the indenture compounds quarterly at the interest rate then in effect. As of June 30, 2011 the total amount of deferred and compounded interest owed under the indenture is $759 thousand. The base interest rate as of June 30, 2011 was 3.40% and as of December 31, 2010 was 3.45%.

All or a portion of the Trust Preferred Capital Notes may be included in the regulatory computation of capital adequacy as Tier 1 capital. Under the current guidelines, Tier 1 capital may include up to 25% of stockholders’ equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the form of Trust Preferred Capital Notes. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the entire amount was considered Tier 1 capital.

10. Net Income Per Share

The following tables show the weighted average number of shares used in computing net income per share and the effect on weighted average number of shares of potential dilutive common stock. Potential dilutive common stock had no effect on income available to common shareholders for the periods presented.


Three Months Ended June 30,	2011				2010

			Per Share				Per Share
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount

Basic net income per share		5,108,821	$	0.08		5,106,819	$	0.04


Effect of dilutive securities, stock options		25,332				969


Diluted net income per share		5,134,153	$	0.08		5,107,788	$	0.04


Net income utilized in the earnings per share calculations above:	$	394,000			$	191,000


Six Months Ended June 30,	2011				2010

			Per Share				Per Share
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount

Basic net income per share		5,108,436	$	0.15		5,106,819	$	0.06


Effect of dilutive securities, stock options		16,715				918


Diluted net income per share		5,125,151	$	0.15		5,107,737	$	0.06


Net income utilized in the earnings per share calculations above:	$	759,000			$	305,000

Average shares of 287,699 and 514,001 have been excluded from the calculation for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively, because their effects were anti-dilutive.

11. Supplemental Cash Flow Information


	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid during the six months	$	2,849	$	4,906


Income taxes paid during the six months	$	—	$	—


Supplemental Disclosures of Noncash Activities:
Fair value adjustment on available-for-sale securities	$	2,014	$	3,371


Transfer of loans to foreclosed assets	$	434	$	1,600

12. Mergers and Acquisitions

On July 27, 2011, Eagle, Bankshares and the Bank entered into the Merger Agreement with respect to the Merger and a related bank merger agreement by and between the Bank and EagleBank (EagleBank), Eagle’s wholly owned subsidiary bank (Bank Merger). The consummation of the Merger and the Bank Merger are conditioned upon, among other things, approvals of applicable regulatory agencies and the shareholders of Bankshares.

The Merger is structured as a stock-for-stock transaction, under which the shareholders of Bankshares will receive 0.4317 shares of Eagle common stock for each

share of Bankshares common stock, subject to adjustment based upon certain factors set forth in the Agreement.

The Merger is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2011, pending approval of the shareholders of Bankshares and the receipt of all required regulatory approvals, as well as other customary conditions as described in the previously filed 8-K on July 29, 2011.

13. Subsequent Event

Bankshares evaluated subsequent events that occurred after the balance sheet date, but before the financial statements are issued. There are two types of subsequent events (1) recognized, or those that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements, and (2) nonrecognized, or those that provided evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after that date. As of the report date, there were no subsequent events that would cause adjustments to or disclosures in the financial statements other than the Merger as described in Note 12.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion is intended to assist readers in understanding and evaluating the financial condition and results of operations of Bankshares and the Bank on a consolidated basis. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Bankshares’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and the unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this report.

Internet Access to Corporate Documents

Information about Bankshares can be found on the Bank’s website at www.alliancebankva.com. Under “Documents / SEC Filings” in the Investor Relations section of the website, Bankshares posts its annual reports, quarterly reports, current reports, definitive proxy materials and any amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). All such filings are available free of charge.

The information available on the Bank’s website is not part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or any other report filed by Bankshares with the SEC.

Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the matters discussed below and elsewhere in this report include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “project,” “contemplate,” “anticipate,” “forecast,” “intend” or other words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements in this report may include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the proposed merger of Bankshares into Eagle Bancorp, Inc., profitability, liquidity, the Bankshares’ loan portfolio, adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and provisions for loan losses, trends regarding net charge-offs, trends regarding levels of nonperforming assets, interest rates and yields, interest rate sensitivity, market risk, regulatory developments, capital requirements, business strategy and other goals or objectives.

You can also identify forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. The forward-looking statements we use in this report are subject to significant risks, assumptions and uncertainties, including among other things, the following important factors that could affect the actual outcome of future events:

	•		Changes in the strength of the national economy in general and the local economies in our market areas that adversely affect our customers and their ability to transact profitable business with us, including the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans according to their terms or a change in the value of the related collateral;

	•		Retention of existing employees;

	•		Maintaining and developing well established and valuable client relationships and referral source relationships;

	•		Changing trends in customer profiles and behavior;

	•		Direct and substantive competition from other financial services companies targeting certain key business lines;

	•		Other competitive factors within the financial services industry;

	•		Changes in the availability of funds resulting in increased costs or reduced liquidity;

	•		Changes in accounting policies, rules and practices;

	•		Changes in market conditions, specifically declines in the residential and commercial real estate market, volatility and disruption of the capital and credit markets, and soundness of other financial institutions we do business with;

	•		The timing of and value realized upon the sale of Other Real Estate Owned (OREO) property;

	•		Changes in the assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for possible loan losses and other estimates;

	•		Fiscal and governmental policies of the United States federal government;

	•		Reactions in financial markets related to potential or actual downgrades in the sovereign credit rating of the United States and the budget deficit or national debt of the United States government;

	•		The impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, related regulatory rulemaking processes and other legislative and regulatory initiatives on the regulation and supervision of financial institutions, specifically depository institutions;

	•		The impact of changes to capital requirements that apply to financial institutions and depository institutions, including changes related to the proposed Basel III capital standards;

	•		Changes in the way the FDIC insurance premiums are assessed;

	•		Changes in interest rates and market prices, which could reduce our net interest margins, asset valuations and expense expectations;

	•		Timing and implementation of certain balance sheet strategies;

	•		Impairment concerns and risks related to our investment portfolio, and the impact of fair value accounting, including income statement volatility;

	•		Assumptions used within our Asset Liability Management (ALM) process and Net Interest Income (NII) and Economic Value of Equity (EVE) models;

	•		Changes in tax laws and regulations;

	•		Our ability to recognize future tax benefits;

	•		Impacts of implementing various accounting standards;

	•		Deposit attrition, operating costs, customer losses and business disruption in connection with the Merger, including adverse effects on relationships with employees, may be greater than expected;

	•		The ability to complete the Merger as expected and within the expected timeframe;

	•		The possibility that required regulatory and shareholder approvals of the Merger may not be obtained, or one or more of the other conditions to the completion of the Merger may not be satisfied;

	•		The expected growth opportunities or cost savings from the merger may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected; and

	•		Other factors described from time to time in our SEC filings.

In addition, our business and financial performance could be impacted as the financial industry restructures in the current environment, both by changes in the creditworthiness and performance of our counterparties and by changes in the regulatory and competitive landscape. Additionally, other risks that cause actual results to differ from predicted results are set forth in Item 1A of Bankshares’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual results and performance may be materially different from results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, our past results of operations are not necessarily indicative of future performance.

We caution you that the above list of important factors is not exclusive. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this report, and we may not undertake steps to update these forward-looking statements to reflect the impact of any circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statements are made.

Critical Accounting Policies

Bankshares’ financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). The financial information contained within our statements is, to a significant extent, based on measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained either when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability. We use historical loss factors as one factor in determining the inherent loss that may be present in our loan portfolio. Actual losses could differ significantly from the historical factors that we use in estimating risk. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another method. Although the economics of our transactions would be the same, the timing of events that would impact our financial statements could change.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of the losses that may be sustained in our loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic principles of accounting: (1) ASC 450-10-05, Contingencies which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimable, and (2) ASC 310-10-35, Receivables which requires that losses be accrued based on the differences between the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary market and the loan balance. The allowance for loan losses has two basic components: the general allowance and the specific allowance.

The general allowance is developed following the accounting principles contained in ASC 450-10-05 and represents the largest component of the total allowance. It is determined by aggregating unclassified loans and unimpaired loans by loan type based on common purpose, collateral, repayment source or other credit characteristics and then applying factors which in the judgment of management represent the expected losses over the life of the loans. In determining those factors, we consider the following: (1) delinquencies and overall risk ratings, (2) loss history, (3) trends in volume and terms of loans, (4) effects of changes in lending policy, (5) the experience and depth of the borrowers’ management, (6) national and local economic trends, (7) concentrations of credit by individual credit size and by class of loans, (8) quality of loan review system and (9) the effect of external factors (e.g., competition and regulatory requirements).

ASC 310-10-35, Receivables is the basis upon which we determine specific reserves on individual loans which comprise the specific allowance. Specific loans to be evaluated for impairment are identified based on the borrower’s loan size and the loan’s risk rating, collateral position and payment history. If it is determined that it is likely that the Bank will not receive full payment in a timely manner, the loan is determined to be impaired. Each such identified loan is then evaluated to determine the amount of reserve that is appropriate based on ASC 310-10-35. This standard also requires that losses be accrued based on the differences between the value of collateral, present value of expected future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary market and the loan balance.

Share-Based Compensation. ASC 718-10, Stock Compensation, requires companies to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments, such as stock options and nonvested shares, based on the fair value of those awards at the date of grant. Compensation cost has been measured using the Black-Scholes model to estimate fair value of an award on the grant date and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period.

Deferred Tax Asset. Bankshares routinely evaluates the likelihood of the recognition of deferred tax assets. The analysis is used to determine if a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is necessary. Our analysis reviews various forms of positive and negative evidence in determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary and if so to what degree a valuation allowance is warranted.

We considered positive evidence such as recent financial performance, previous earnings patterns, the recent history of loan charge-offs, nonperforming assets, OREO expenses, multiyear business projections and the potential realization of net operating loss (NOL) carry forwards within the prescribed time periods. We considered negative evidence such as operating losses in prior fiscal periods and trends in market values of our real estate collateral. We considered several different economic scenarios in evaluating whether the projected income in future periods was sufficient to recover the NOL over the prescribed period. In addition, we considered tax planning strategies that would impact the timing and extent of taxable income. The projected performance metrics over the period of NOL recognition indicates that, as of June 30, 2011, it is more likely than not that Bankshares will have sufficient taxable income in the future to recognize the deferred tax assets. Therefore, Bankshares has concluded that a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is not necessary as of June 30, 2011.

Overview

On July 27, 2011, Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (Eagle), Bankshares and the Bank entered into an Agreement of Merger (Merger Agreement), pursuant to which Bankshares will merge with and into Eagle, with Eagle being the surviving corporation. Under the Merger Agreement, Bankshares agreed to conduct its business in the ordinary course while the Merger is pending, and, except as permitted under the Merger Agreement, to generally refrain from specific actions without the consent of Eagle. Completion of the Merger is subject to approval by Bankshares’ shareholders, applicable regulatory approval and customary closing conditions.

Notwithstanding the Merger Agreement, Bankshares’ primary long-term goals continue to be maximizing earnings and deploying capital in profit driven initiatives that will enhance shareholder value in a sustainable fashion. In pursuit of these goals, Bankshares’ current emphasis is on optimizing profitability in the near term and strengthening the financial performance of the Company, while also transitioning its operations to focus more closely on traditional banking activities and to reposition Bankshares for the future. Bankshares’ transitional strategies include, among others, continuing the following initiatives:

	•		Diversifying the loan portfolio by increasing our focus on commercial loans and loans secured by owner occupied commercial real estate, while continuing to be an active lender in attractive aspects of the residential and commercial real estate markets.

	•		Reducing the investment securities portfolio and eliminating the trading assets portfolio.

	•		Continuing to attentively manage the level of nonperforming assets by addressing problem loans on a timely basis.

	•		Increasing low cost deposits by local commercial and retail customers, while working to reduce our brokered deposit portfolio.

	•		Reducing our operating and funding costs.

Performance Highlights

	•		Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 was $394 thousand compared to net income of $191 thousand for the same period in 2010, an improvement of $203 thousand. Net income was $759 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to net income of $305 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Earnings per common share, basic and diluted, amounted to $0.15 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $0.06 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

	•		Total assets were $536.0 million at June 30, 2011, a decrease of $2.5 million from December 31, 2010 total assets of $538.5 million. The decrease in total assets is directly related to the payoff of a number of loan relationships and reductions in our investment securities portfolio, offset by an increase in cash and due from banks. The increase in cash relates to the cyclical nature of our title and escrow clients.

	•		Total loans were $321.5 million at June 30, 2011, a decrease of $10.8 million, or 3.25% from the December 31, 2010 balance of $332.3 million. The decrease results from the payoffs of a number of loan relationships as well as scheduled principal repayments. While new loan activity has increased in the first six months of 2011, the volume of originations has not kept pace with repayments. Each loan segment as a percentage of total loans at June 30, 2011 is nearly unchanged from the percentages at December 31, 2010.

	•		Our ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets was 2.98% as of June 30, 2011 compared to 1.75% as of December 31, 2010, an increase of 123 basis points. As of June 30, 2011, the composition of nonperforming assets was $10.5 million of nonaccrual loans, $408 thousand of loans 90 days past due and still accruing, $4.3 million of OREO, and $749 thousand of troubled debt restructured loans for a total of $16.0 million, compared to total nonperforming assets as of December 31, 2010, of $9.4 million. The nonaccrual balance increased by $8.6 million at June 30, 2011. The level of nonperforming assets continues to reflect the increase that occurred as of March 31, 2011

		when two large commercial relationships were moved to nonaccrual status. In one case, the majority of the relationship exposure is expected to return to performing status prior to year-end 2011 as payments have resumed on a majority of the notes. In the second case, the borrower has continued to make payments on the notes, but the borrower’s future prospects continue to present a higher risk profile.

•		The investment securities portfolio totaled $108.8 million at June 30, 2011. This compares to $135.9 million of investments as of December 31, 2010, a decrease of $27.1 million. Targeted efforts by management to strategically restructure the balance sheet as well as opportunistic gains taking led to the reduction in the investment securities portfolio.

•		The net interest margin for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 was 3.86% compared to 3.84% for the same 2010 period, an increase of 2 basis points. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the interest margin of 3.82% was 7 basis points higher than the net interest margin of 3.75% for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

•		Deposits were $412.0 million at June 30, 2011, an increase of $5.1 million from the December 31, 2010 balance of $406.9 million.

•		Demand deposits were $130.8 million at June 30, 2011, or 31.7% of total deposits. This compares to the December 31, 2010 level of $124.6 million or 30.6% of total deposits.

•		Non-interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011, amounted to $3.8 million compared to $4.4 million for the same period in 2010, a decrease of $647 thousand. The key components of the decrease in non-interest expense are salary and benefit expense and occupancy and equipment costs.

Financial Performance Measures. Bankshares’ net income for the three month period ended June 30, 2011 was $394 thousand, an improvement of $203 thousand over the second quarter of 2010 net income of $191 thousand. The net income of $394 thousand includes net interest income of $4.3 million compared to $4.9 million for the same period last year, a decrease of $556 thousand. That decrease is due primarily to a decrease in interest income in the amount of $1.2 million, which was partially offset by a decrease of $623 thousand in the cost of funds. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, total interest expense was $1.4 million compared to $2.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. These results led to $0.08 basic and diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, compared to $0.04 basic and diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. Weighted average basic shares outstanding were 5,108,821 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 5,106,819 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Weighted average diluted shares outstanding were 5,134,153 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 5,107,788 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.

For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, Bankshares had net income of $759 thousand compared to $305 thousand for the same period in the prior year, an improvement of $454 thousand. The net income of $759 thousand includes net interest income of $8.7 million compared to $9.5 million for the same period last year, a decrease of $839 thousand. That decrease is due primarily to a decrease in interest income in the amount of $2.3 million, which was partially offset by a decrease of $1.4 million in the cost of funds. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, total interest expense was $3.0 million compared to $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. These results led to $0.15 basic and diluted income per share for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The basic and diluted income per share for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $0.06. Weighted average basic shares outstanding were 5,108,436 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 5,106,819 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding were 5,125,151 and 5,107,737 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively.

Net interest margin increased to 3.86% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 3.84% for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of 2 basis points. Net interest margin was 3.82% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 3.75% for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an improvement of 7 basis points. A key contributing factor to the improved net interest margin was the lower cost of funds during 2011. Net interest margin for the first six months was negatively affected by the increase in non-accrual loans and by a decrease in the yield on interest earning assets. Total interest income reversed for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $311 thousand compared to $116 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Results of Operations

Net Interest Income. Net interest income (on a fully tax equivalent basis) for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $4.3 million compared to $5.0 million for the same period in 2010. Interest income on earning assets was $1.3 million lower for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the second quarter of 2010, while interest expense decreased $623 thousand in the same time period.

Net interest income (on a fully tax equivalent basis) for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $8.7 million compared to $9.7 million for the same period in 2010. Interest income on earning assets was $2.4 million lower for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the first six months of 2010. Of the $2.4 million decrease in interest income, $858 thousand is attributable to the $30.0 million lower average balance in loans. The decrease in yield from 5.92% to 5.68% in the loan portfolio also contributed $410 thousand to the decrease in interest income. The reduction in the average balance in the investment securities portfolio was $26.2 million and contributed $551 thousand to the reduction in interest income. The decrease in yield from 4.64% to 3.94% in the investment securities portfolio also contributed $497 thousand to the decrease in interest income. This was offset by the decrease in interest expense of $1.4 million. The average balance of interest bearing deposits decreased by $49.4 million and contributed $540 thousand to the reduction in interest expense. The average rate paid on deposits improved to 1.58% from 2.15%, which reduced interest expense by $749 thousand. A lower average balance of borrowed funds offset a higher rate paid on borrowed funds.

The following table illustrates average balances of total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated, showing the average distribution of assets, liabilities, stockholders’ equity and related income, expense and corresponding weighted average yields and rates. The average balances used in these tables and other statistical data were calculated using daily average balances.

Average Balances, Interest Income and Expense and Average Yield and Rates⁽¹⁾


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2011								2010
	Average			Income /		Yield /			Average			Income /		Yield /
	Balance			Expense		Rate ¹			Balance			Expense		Rate ¹
						(dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Loans ⁽²⁾	$	320,845		$	4,555		5.69	%	$	348,425		$	5,228		6.02	%
Trading securities		745			12		6.46	%		2,961			49		6.64	%
Investment securities		119,314			1,192		4.01	%		152,167			1,740		4.59	%
Federal funds sold		8,866			12		0.54	%		14,601			11		0.30	%

Total interest earning assets		449,770			5,771		5.15	%		518,154			7,028		5.44	%

Non-interest earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		22,882								21,746
Premises and equipment		1,581								1,930
Other real estate owned (OREO)		4,453								8,746
Other assets		16,514								17,978
Less: allowance for loan losses		(5,386	)							(5,509	)

Total non-interest earning assets		40,044								44,891

Total Assets	$	489,814							$	563,045


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	42,601		$	28		0.26	%	$	46,473		$	53		0.46	%
Money market deposit accounts		24,173			45		0.75	%		25,162			72		1.15	%
Savings accounts		2,850			2		0.28	%		3,782			2		0.21	%
Time deposits		201,855			971		1.93	%		234,682			1,468		2.51	%

Total interest-bearing deposits		271,479			1,046		1.55	%		310,099			1,595		2.06	%
FHLB advances⁽³⁾		41,059			256		2.50	%		63,743			305		1.92	%
Other borrowings		48,860			145		1.19	%		53,915			170		1.26	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities		361,398			1,447		1.61	%		427,757			2,070		1.94	%

Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		91,033								97,884
Other liabilities		2,802								2,741

Total liabilities		455,233								528,382
Stockholders’ Equity		34,581								34,663

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	489,814							$	563,045


Interest Spread ⁽⁴⁾							3.54	%							3.50	%


Net Interest Margin⁽⁵⁾				$	4,324		3.86	%				$	4,958		3.84	%


⁽¹⁾		The rates and yields are on a fully tax equivalent basis assuming a 34% federal tax rate.

⁽²⁾		The Bank had average nonaccrual loans of $11.0 million and $3.7 million in the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The 2011 and 2010 interest income on nonaccrual loans excluded from the loans above was $117 thousand and $54 thousand, respectively.

⁽³⁾		Average fair value of FHLB advances for the second quarter of 2011 and 2010 was $26.1 million and $26.1 million, respectively.

⁽⁴⁾		Interest spread is the average yield earned on earning assets, less the average rate incurred on interest-bearing liabilities.

⁽⁵⁾		Net interest margin is net interest income expressed as a percentage of average earning assets.

Average loan balances were $320.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $348.4 million for the same period in 2010. The decrease in average loans is a result of management’s short-term strategy to reduce certain types of real estate lending, such as land acquisition and development financing. The longer-term strategy is to grow small business commercial loans and owner occupied commercial real estate and focus on our geographical area. The related interest income from loans was $4.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $5.2 million in the same period in 2010. The average yield on loans of 5.69% during the three months ended June 30, 2011 was 33 basis points lower than the yield of 6.02% in the second quarter of 2010. Interest rates are established for classes of loans that include variable rates based on Wall Street Journal Prime or other identifiable bases while others carry fixed rates with terms out to 15 years. Most new variable rate originations include minimum start rates and/or floors.

Trading securities averaged $745 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $3.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Trading securities interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $12 thousand compared to $49 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The reduction in average trading securities reflects management’s business strategy to eliminate the trading securities portfolio as we reposition the balance sheet and led to the reduction in associated interest income. At June 30, 2011, there was a single instrument in the trading securities portfolio with a carrying value of $658 thousand.

The average balance of investment securities was $119.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to $152.2 million for the same quarter in 2010. Investment securities income (on a fully tax equivalent basis) was $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The tax equivalent average yield on investment securities for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was 4.01% compared to 4.59% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The reduction in the average balance of investment securities from the sale of securities reflects management’s business strategy to reduce the investment securities portfolio and the opportunistic taking of gains.

Short-term investments in federal funds sold contributed $12 thousand to interest income in the three month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to $11 thousand for the same period in 2010. The average balance for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $8.9 million, a $5.7 million decrease from the prior year average balance of $14.6 million. This relates to the lower average balance of interest bearing and non-interest bearing demand deposits for the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010.

The average balance of cash and due from banks was $22.9 million and $21.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The deposit flows from the title and escrow clients can have significant volatility especially at month end or quarter end and explains some of the variance between the average cash and due from banks balances and the period-end balances.

Total average interest earning assets yielded 5.15% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the yield of 5.44% for the same period in 2010. Total interest income (on a fully tax equivalent basis) was $5.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $7.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Interest income decreased from the second quarter of 2010 to the second quarter of 2011 due to smaller average loans and securities

balances, which are a product of our strategy to reposition our balance sheet, and lower yields generated by our interest-earning assets in the low interest rate environment.

Total average interest-bearing liabilities were $361.4 million in the second quarter of 2011, or $66.4 million lower than the second quarter of 2010 level of $427.8 million. A key driver of the decrease is the decrease in average time deposits. The average balance for time deposits for the second quarter of 2011 was $201.9 million compared to the second quarter of 2010 average balance of $234.7 million, a decrease of $32.8 million. Interest expense for all interest-bearing liabilities amounted to $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $2.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, or a savings of $623 thousand. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the second quarter of 2011 was 1.61% or 33 basis points lower than the second quarter of 2010 level of 1.94%. The lower interest rate environment allowed for competitive repricing of interest bearing demand accounts, money market accounts, savings accounts and client based time deposits. The Bank prices these deposit accounts on a competitive basis with local market financial institutions, general economic conditions and market interest rates.

In addition, the Bank benefited from significant downward repricing of the brokered certificate of deposit portfolio. Many of the larger wholesale deposits with higher rates have matured or repriced downward. The average balance of brokered deposits for the second quarter of 2011 was $122.6 million at an average cost of 1.88%. The average balance of brokered deposits for the second quarter of 2010 was $104.1 million at an average cost of 2.36%. The benefits of the repricing are seen in the lower time deposit cost of 1.93% during the second quarter of 2011 compared to 2.51% during the same period of 2010.

Non-interest bearing demand deposits averaged $91.0 million for the second quarter of 2011, or $6.9 million less than the second quarter of 2010 level of $97.9 million.

Average Balances, Interest Income and Expense and Average Yield and Rates⁽¹⁾


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011								2010
	Average			Income /		Yield /			Average			Income /		Yield /
	Balance			Expense		Rate ¹			Balance			Expense		Rate ¹
						(dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Loans ⁽²⁾	$	322,986		$	9,100		5.68	%	$	352,965		$	10,368		5.92	%
Trading securities		1,283			45		7.07	%		4,359			137		6.34	%
Investment securities		129,970			2,542		3.94	%		156,132			3,590		4.64	%
Federal funds sold		7,723			22		0.57	%		10,718			22		0.41	%

Total interest earning assets		461,962			11,709		5.11	%		524,174			14,117		5.43	%

Non-interest earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		21,099								20,616
Premises and equipment		1,592								1,965
Other real estate owned (OREO)		4,477								8,336
Other assets		17,540								19,518
Less: allowance for loan losses		(5,432	)							(5,573	)

Total non-interest earning assets		39,276								44,862

Total Assets	$	501,238							$	569,036


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	42,242		$	58		0.28	%	$	44,561		$	122		0.55	%
Money market deposit accounts		24,849			94		0.76	%		24,114			151		1.26	%
Savings accounts		3,332			4		0.24	%		3,662			6		0.33	%
Time deposits		199,960			1,968		1.98	%		247,453			3,134		2.55	%

Total interest-bearing deposits		270,383			2,124		1.58	%		319,790			3,413		2.15	%
FHLB advances⁽³⁾		41,132			515		2.52	%		60,690			584		1.94	%
Other borrowings		63,572			325		1.03	%		60,359			379		1.27	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities		375,087			2,964		1.59	%		440,839			4,376		2.00	%

Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		89,505								91,632
Other liabilities		2,544								2,524

Total liabilities		467,136								534,995
Stockholders’ Equity		34,102								34,041

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	501,238							$	569,036


Interest Spread ⁽⁴⁾							3.52	%							3.43	%


Net Interest Margin⁽⁵⁾				$	8,745		3.82	%				$	9,741		3.75	%


⁽¹⁾		The rates and yields are on a fully tax equivalent basis assuming a 34% federal tax rate.

⁽²⁾		The Bank had average nonaccrual loans of $8.2 million and $4.2 million for the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The 2011 and 2010 interest income on nonaccrual loans excluded from the loans above was $311 thousand and $116 thousand, respectively.

⁽³⁾		Average fair value of FHLB advances for the first six months of 2011 and 2010 was $26.1 million and $26.0 million, respectively.

⁽⁴⁾		Interest spread is the average yield earned on earning assets, less the average rate incurred on interest-bearing liabilities.

⁽⁵⁾		Net interest margin is net interest income expressed as a percentage of average earning assets.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, average loan balances were $323.0 million compared to $353.0 million for the same period in 2010, a decrease of $30.0 million. Interest income from loans was $9.1 million in the first six months of 2011 compared to $10.4 million in the same period of 2010, with the average yield decreasing to 5.68% from 5.92%. The lower average balance contributed $858 thousand and the lower yield contributed $410 thousand to the $1.3 million decrease in interest income on loans.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011 average trading securities were $1.3 million, compared to $4.4 million for the same period in 2010. The decrease is a result of management’s continued efforts to eliminate the trading securities portfolio. Trading securities interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $45 thousand compared to $137 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The lower average balance contributed $110 thousand to the lower income and was offset with the higher yield contribution of $18 thousand resulting in the decrease of $92 thousand in interest income on trading securities.

Investment securities averaged $130.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $156.1 million for the same period in 2010. Investment securities income (on a fully tax equivalent basis) was $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $1.1 million. The tax equivalent average yield on investment securities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was 3.94% compared to the yield of 4.64% for the same period in 2010. The lower average balance contributed $551 thousand and the lower yield contributed $497 thousand to the $1.1 million decrease in interest income on investment securities.

Short-term investments in federal funds sold contributed $22 thousand to interest income in the six month period ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. A decrease in the average balance of federal funds sold was offset by the increase in the yield.

Total average earning assets yielded 5.11% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 or 32 basis points lower than the yield of 5.43% for the same period in 2010. Total interest income (on a fully tax equivalent basis) was $11.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $14.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Total average interest-bearing liabilities were $375.1 million in the first six months of 2011 or $65.7 million less than the first six months of 2010 level of $440.8 million. The average balance of time deposits was $47.5 million lower than the same period last year. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, interest expense was $3.0 million compared to $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The $1.4 million decrease in interest expense primarily resulted from $1.5 million decrease attributable to lower average volume of interest bearing liabilities. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the first six months of 2011 was 1.59% or 41 basis points lower than the 2010 level of 2.00%. Many of the larger wholesale deposits have matured and new brokered deposits were issued at lower interest rates.

The average balance of brokered deposits for the first six months of 2011 was $115.8 million at an average cost of 1.92%. The average balance of brokered deposits for the first six months of 2010 was $120.1 million at an average cost of 2.34%. Favorable market conditions

have allowed for reissuance of maturing brokered deposits at lower effective rates. Total brokered deposits at June 30, 2011 were $122.5 million with an average rate of 1.62%.

The following table describes the impact on our tax equivalent interest income and expense resulting from changes in average balances and average rates for the periods indicated. The change in interest income due to both volume and rate has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.


	Volume and Rate Analysis
	Six Months Ended June 30
	2011 compared to 2010
	Change Due To:
	(Decrease)			Volume			Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest Earning Assets:
Loans	$	(1,268	)	$	(858	)	$	(410	)
Trading securities		(92	)		(110	)		18
Investment securities		(1,048	)		(551	)		(497	)
Federal funds sold		—			(3	)		3


Total (decrease) in interest income		(2,408	)		(1,522	)		(886	)

Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits		(1,289	)		(540	)		(749	)
Borrowed funds		(123	)		(934	)		811


Total (decrease) in interest expense		(1,412	)		(1,474	)		62


(Decrease) in net interest income	$	(996	)	$	(48	)	$	(948	)

Non-interest Income (Other Income). Non-interest income amounted to $819 thousand during the three months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $406 thousand from $413 thousand for the same period of 2010.

Bankshares recorded a net gain of $835 thousand on the sale of investment securities in the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to a net gain of $803 thousand in the three months ended June 30, 2010. Bankshares views the available for sale investment portfolio as a tool in managing the overall balance sheet and liquidity positions of the organization. From time to time, Bankshares will sell investment securities to achieve certain business objectives. These sales may result in gains or losses depending on the timing and book value of instruments sold.

Trading security activity and fair value adjustments recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2011 resulted in a net loss of $130 thousand, compared to a net loss of $426 thousand for the same period in 2010, a decrease of $296 thousand. The net loss of $130 thousand is primarily driven by a negative fair value adjustment of $224 thousand on the FHLB advance offset by the $94 thousand positive adjustment in trading securities. At contractual maturity, the FHLB

advance will become due at par and any unrealized loss will be recognized as trading income as maturity approaches.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, non-interest income was $1.0 million compared to $674 thousand for the 2010 period. The increase is attributable to the lower level of adjustments in trading securities and FHLB advance fair value adjustments. At June 30, 2011, this loss was $106 thousand compared to the $616 thousand loss at June 30, 2010.

Non-interest Expense (Other Expenses). During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we made important progress toward our strategic goal of optimizing profitability by decreasing our non-interest expenses.

Non-interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011, amounted to $3.8 million compared to $4.4 million for the same period in 2010, a decrease of $647 thousand. A key component of non-interest expense is salary and benefits expense. This expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 was $1.4 million, compared to the second quarter of 2010 level of $1.5 million, a decrease of $143 thousand. Occupancy and equipment costs were $719 thousand compared to the 2010 level of $830, a decrease of $111 thousand.

OREO expense was $16 thousand for the second quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to $351 thousand for the same period in 2010. In the quarter ended June 30, 2010 there were losses on sale of OREO of $254 thousand with no similar charge in the quarter ended June 30, 2011. In addition, the OREO balance consists of mostly undeveloped land with no maintenance cost.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, non-interest expense was $7.5 million compared to $9.0 million for the 2010 period, a decrease of $1.5 million. Salaries and employee benefits decreased by $754 thousand, occupancy and equipment costs decreased by $204 thousand, OREO expense decreased by $343 thousand, FDIC assessments decreased by $25 thousand, and other operating expenses decreased by $145 thousand.

Income Taxes. We recorded income tax expense of $373 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This income tax expense was an increase of $382 thousand over the same period in 2010.

Analysis of Financial Condition

Trading Securities. At June 30, 2011, the trading portfolio consisted of one PCMO security with a fair value of $658 thousand compared to three PCMO securities with a fair value of $2.2 million for the same period in 2010. The current effective portfolio yield is 5.43%.

The following table reflects our trading assets and effective yield on the instruments as of the dates indicated:


						Trading Securities
	June 30,					December 31,					June 30,
	2011					2010					2010
	Fair					Fair					Fair
	Value		Yield			Value		Yield			Value		Yield
						(dollars in thousands)
PCMOs⁽¹⁾	$	658		5.43	%	$	2,075		5.32	%	$	2,250		5.33	%


Totals	$	658		5.43	%	$	2,075		5.32	%	$	2,250		5.33	%


⁽¹⁾		As of June 30, 2011, trading securities consisted of one PCMO instrument. This PCMO was rated AAA by at least one ratings agency on the purchase date. Currently the security has a rating below investment grade. The instrument is currently performing as expected.

Trading Securities Classified as Level 3. Beginning in the third quarter of 2008, and continuing through to the present time, portions of the investment and debt markets have experienced a period of significant distress and dysfunction, and market values for certain financial instruments may not be readily available. Bankshares believes that some of the investment and debt markets remain depressed. Although certain portions of the investment and debt markets have improved, the fair value of an investment security may not be the same as a liquidation value. As such, Level 3 evaluations of the fair value are used. The fair value methods used to evaluate trading assets include typical market spreads for the instruments, option adjusted spreads, swap curves, discounted cashflow models, default levels, prepayment spreads, tranche classification, previously observable non-distressed valuations and bond issuance rates and spreads for investment and non-investment grade instruments. We believe this approach more accurately reflects the fair value of the PCMO security in the portfolio.

Investment Securities — Available for Sale. On June 30, 2011, our investment portfolio contained callable and non-callable U.S. government agency securities, U.S. government agency collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), U.S. government agency mortgage backed securities (MBS), PCMOs, and municipal securities. As of June 30, 2011, U.S. government agency securities were $34.2 million or 31.4% of the portfolio, PCMOs, CMOs and MBS made up 45.1% of the portfolio or $49.0 million and municipal securities were 23.5% of the portfolio or $25.6 million.

We actively manage our portfolio duration and composition with changing market conditions and changes in balance sheet risk management needs. Additionally, the securities are pledged as collateral for certain borrowing transactions and repurchase agreements. The total amount of the investment securities accounted for under available-for-sale accounting was

$108.8 million at June 30, 2011 compared to $135.9 million at December 31, 2010. Targeted efforts to strategically restructure our balance sheet led to shifts in our investment portfolio mix and reduced the investment securities portfolio’s balance. Management has taken opportunistic gains, while shortening the duration of the portfolio.

The yield on the investment securities portfolio as of June 30, 2011 was 4.0%. During the first six months of 2011, the Bank earned $2.5 million on the investment securities portfolio or an effective tax equivalent yield of 3.94%. The investment securities portfolio contains mortgage oriented products (CMO, PCMO, and MBS) and SBA securities.


	Investment Securities- Available-for-Sale
	June 30, 2011								December 31, 2010								June 30, 2010
	Fair					% of			Fair					% of			Fair					% of
	Value		Yield			Total			Value		Yield			Total			Value		Yield			Total
									(dollars in thousands)
U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	34,208		2.78	%		31.4	%	$	51,763		4.50	%		38.1	%	$	51,812		4.28	%		40.1	%
U.S. government agency CMOs		23,282		3.56	%		21.4	%		22,576		3.96	%		16.6	%		28,333		3.75	%		22.0	%
U.S. government agency MBS		16,833		3.65	%		15.5	%		14,805		3.82	%		10.9	%		10,949		3.82	%		8.5	%
PCMOs		8,884		5.39	%		8.2	%		17,621		5.16	%		13.0	%		20,582		5.24	%		16.0	%
Municipal securities		25,598		5.14	%		23.5	%		29,087		5.11	%		21.4	%		17,231		5.77	%		13.4	%

Total Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	$	108,805		4.00	%		100.0	%	$	135,852		4.32	%		100.0	%	$	128,907		4.59	%		100.0	%

The following table summarizes the contractual maturity of the investment securities on an amortized cost basis and their weighted average yield as of June 30, 2011:


	Contractual Maturities of Investment Securities
	June 30, 2011
	(dollars in thousands)
						After One					After Five
	Within					Year but Within					Years but Within
	One Year					Five Years					Ten Years					After Ten Years
	Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Total ^(4,5)		Yield

Available-For-Sale Securities
U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	—		0	%	$	9,174		1.3	%	$	—		0.0	%	$	24,601		3.3	%	$	33,775		2.8	%
U.S. government agency CMOs ⁽¹⁾		—		0	%		—		0.0	%		—		0.0	%		22,433		3.6	%		22,433		3.6	%
U.S. government agency MBS ⁽¹⁾		—		0	%		—		0.0	%		—		0.0	%		16,401		3.7	%		16,401		3.7	%
PCMOs⁽¹⁾		—		0	%		—		0.0	%		4,962		5.5	%		3,713		5.2	%		8,675		5.4	%
Municipal securities ⁽²⁾		—		0	%		—		0.0	%		5,379		4.5	%		20,565		5.3	%		25,944		5.1	%

Total Available-For-Sale Securities⁽³⁾	$	—		0	%	$	9,174		1.3	%	$	10,341		5.1	%	$	87,713		4.2	%	$	107,228		4.0	%


⁽¹⁾		Contractual maturities of CMOs, PCMOs and MBS are not reliable indicators of their expected life because mortgage borrowers have the right to prepay mortgages at any time.

⁽²⁾		Municipal securities yield is on a fully tax equivalent basis assuming a 34% federal tax rate.

⁽³⁾		We do not have any held-to-maturity securities as of June 30, 2011.

⁽⁴⁾		Total above is amortized cost and does not include unrealized gain of $1,577 thousand.

⁽⁵⁾		Total available for sale securities amounted to $108.8 million. The fair value of the contractual maturities listed in the total above amounts to $108.8 million.

Restricted Securities. Bankshares’ security portfolio contains restricted securities that are required to be held as part of the Company’s banking operations. These include stock of the Federal Reserve Bank, the FHLB and others. The following table summarizes the balances of restricted stock at the dates indicated:


	Restricted Stock
	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,
	2011		2010		2010
			(dollars in thousands)
Federal Reserve Bank Stock	$	1,201	$	1,201	$	1,201
FHLB stock		4,158		4,948		5,530
Bankers’ Bank stock		206		206		206


Total Restricted Stock	$	5,565	$	6,355	$	6,937

Loan Portfolio. In its lending activities, Bankshares seeks to develop substantial relationships with clients whose business and individual banking needs will grow with the Bank. The Company has made significant efforts to be responsive to the lending needs in the markets served, while maintaining sound asset quality and credit practices. We grant credit to commercial business, commercial real estate, real estate construction, residential real estate and consumer borrowers in the normal course of business. The loan portfolio net of discounts and fees was $321.5 million as of June 30, 2011 or $10.8 million lower than the December 31, 2010 level of $332.3 million and $20.6 million less than June 30, 2010 level of $342.1 million.

The following table summarizes the composition of the loan portfolio by dollar amount and each segment as a percentage of the total loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:


	Loan Portfolio
	June 30, 2011					December 31, 2010					June 30, 2010
	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
						(dollars in thousands)
Residential real estate	$	107,685		33	%	$	110,862		34	%	$	108,963		32	%
Commercial real estate		143,133		45	%		146,222		44	%		145,318		43	%
Construction/land		39,546		12	%		43,017		13	%		49,555		14	%
Commercial and industrial		27,317		9	%		27,517		8	%		34,145		10	%
Consumer — non real estate		3,808		1	%		4,692		1	%		4,108		1	%


Total Loans	$	321,489		100	%	$	332,310		100	%	$	342,089		100	%

Substantially all loans are initially underwritten based on identifiable cash flows and supported by appropriate advance rates on collateral which is independently valued. Commercial loans are generally secured by accounts receivable, equipment and business assets. Commercial real estate is secured by income producing properties of all types. Real estate construction loans are supported by projects which generally require an appropriate level of pre-sales or pre-leasing. Generally, all commercial and real estate loans have full recourse to the

owners and/or sponsors. Residential real estate is secured by first or second trusts on both owner-occupied and investor-owned residential properties.

As noted in the table above, loans secured by various types of real estate constitute a significant portion of total loans. Commercial real estate loans represent the largest dollar exposure. Substantially all of these loans are secured by properties in the Metropolitan Washington, D.C. area with the heaviest concentration in Northern Virginia and Fairfax County in particular. Risk is managed through diversification by sub-market, property type, and loan size. Risk is further managed by seeking investment property loans with multiple tenants and by emphasizing owner-occupied loans. The average loan size in this portfolio is $679 thousand as of June 30, 2011.

The table also shows a continuing reduction in the real estate construction portion of the portfolio, which represented 12% of the portfolio at June 30, 2011 compared to 20% at December 31, 2008. The current levels of real estate construction loans are a product of management’s efforts to de-emphasize this type of lending in recent years. New originations in this segment are being underwritten in the context of current market conditions and are particularly focused in sub-markets which appear to be the strongest in the region. Legacy loans, particularly in the land portion of this portfolio, have been largely converted to amortizing loans with regular principal and interest payments. We expect to see further reductions in our land exposure offset by potential increases in certain residential construction activities as market conditions improve.

Loans secured by residential real estate have remained relatively constant since June 30, 2010, with growth in our 1-4 family first trust loans partially offset by the reductions in our 1-4 family subordinate trust loans (HELOCs and closed-end 2^nd mortgages). All loans in both categories represent loans underwritten by us (we do not purchase loans in this portfolio) to customers with whom we have direct contact in the local communities we serve. We believe that our underwriting criteria reflect current market conditions. The portfolio of first mortgage loans had an average size per housing unit of $331 thousand as of June 30, 2011. Our subordinate trust loans averaged $99 thousand per property as of June 30, 2011. While we recognize that the Metropolitan Washington, D.C. residential real estate market is in a nascent recovery, we believe our current underwriting standards, our emphasis on serving the sub-markets we know, the granularity of our portfolio, and our continued reduction of our subordinate trust portfolio represent appropriate risk management for this portfolio.

The following table presents the maturities or repricing periods of selected loans outstanding at June 30, 2011:


	Loan Maturity Distribution
	As Of June 30, 2011
	One Year		After One Year		After
	or Less		Through Five Years		Five Years		Total
			(dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial	$	14,748	$	8,729	$	3,840	$	27,317
Construction/land		26,501		11,072		1,973		39,546


Total	$	41,249	$	19,801	$	5,813	$	66,863

Loans with:
Fixed rates	$	68,281	$	77,534	$	72,520	$	218,335
Variable rates		40,296		57,116		5,742		103,154

Total	$	108,577	$	134,650	$	78,262	$	321,489

Asset Quality

We segregate loans meeting the criteria for special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss from non-classified, or pass rated, loans. We review the characteristics of each rating at least annually, generally during the first quarter of each year. The characteristics of these ratings are as follows:

Pass and watch rated loans (risk ratings 1 to 6) are to persons or business entities with an acceptable financial condition, appropriate collateral margins, appropriate cash flow to service the existing loans, and an appropriate leverage ratio. The borrower has paid all obligations as agreed and it is expected that the borrower will maintain this type of payment history. When necessary, acceptable personal guarantors support the loan.

Special mention loans (risk rating 7) have a specific defined weakness in the borrower’s operations and/or the borrower’s ability to generate positive cash flow on a sustained basis. The borrower’s recent payment history is characterized by late payments. Bankshares’ risk exposure to special mention loans is mitigated by collateral supporting the loan. The collateral is considered to be well-managed, well maintained, accessible and readily marketable.

Substandard loans (risk rating 8) are considered to have specific and well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the viability of Bankshares’ credit extension. The payment history for the loan has been inconsistent and the expected or projected primary repayment source may be inadequate to service the loan. The estimated net liquidation value of the collateral pledged and/or ability of the personal guarantors to pay the loan may not adequately protect Bankshares. There is a distinct possibility that Bankshares will sustain some loss if the deficiencies associated with the loan are not corrected in the near term. A substandard loan would not automatically meet our definition of an impaired loan unless the loan is significantly past due and the borrower’s performance and financial condition provide evidence that it is probable Bankshares will be unable to collect all amounts due.

Substandard non-accrual loans have the same characteristics as substandard loans. However these loans have a non-accrual classification generally because the borrower’s principal or interest payments are 90 days or more past due.

Doubtful rated loans (risk rating 9) have all the weakness inherent in a loan that is classified as substandard but with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss related to doubtful rated loans is extremely high.

Loss (risk rating 10) rated loans are not considered collectible under normal circumstances and there is no realistic expectation for any future payment on the loan. Loss rated loans are fully charged off.

The table below represents the Company’s loan portfolio by risk rating, classification, and loan portfolio segment as of June 30, 2011.


	Credit Quality Asset By Class
	As of June 30, 2011
	(dollars in thousands)
					Special								Total
INTERNAL RISK RATING GRADES	Pass		Watch		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Loans

Risk Rating Number ¹	1 to 5		6		7		8		9		10

Commercial and Industrial	$	23,983	$	864	$	719	$	1,736	$	15	$	—	$	27,317
Commercial real estate
Owner occupied		66,506		1,601		789		2,677		—		—		71,573
Non-owner occupied		63,136		2,601		3,883		1,940		—		—		71,560
Construction/land
Residential construction		14,275		—		—		—		536		—		14,811
Other construction & land		15,476		1,837		556		6,530		336		—		24,735
Residential real estate
Equity Lines		29,075		999		—		44		122		—		30,240
Single family		59,066		1,579		3,636		7,770		578		—		72,629
Multifamily		4,816		—		—		—		—		—		4,816
Consumer — non real estate		3,549		259		—		—		—		—		3,808

Totals	$	279,882	$	9,740	$	9,583	$	20,697	$	1,587	$	—	$	321,489


¹		Internal risk ratings of pass (rating numbers 1 to 5) and watch (rating number 6) are deemed to be unclassified assets. Internal risk ratings of special mention (rating number 7), substandard (rating number 8), doubtful (rating number 9) and loss (rating number 10) are deemed to be classified assets.

As part of our normal credit risk management practices, we regularly monitor the payment performance of our borrowers. Substantially all loans require some form of payment on a monthly basis, with a high percentage requiring regular amortization of principal. However, certain HELOCs, commercial and industrial lines of credit, and construction loans generally require only monthly interest payments.

The following table sets forth the aging and non-accrual loans by class, as of June 30, 2011:


	Aging and Non-accrual Loans By Class
	As of June 30, 2011:
	(dollars in thousands)
											90-days
					90 Days or						Past Due
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		More Past		Total Past				and Still		Nonaccrual
	Past Due		Past Due		Due		Due		Current ¹		Accruing		Loans

Commerical and Industrial	$	979	$	205	$	—	$	1,184	$	26,133	$	—	$	1,067
Commercial real estate
Owner occupied		2,677		—		15		2,692		68,881				2,692
Non-owner occupied		100		—		408		508		71,052		408		100
Construction/land
Residential construction		—		—		536		536		14,275		—		536
Other construction & land		1,781		180		2,896		4,857		19,878		—		4,033
Residential real estate
Equity Lines		1,114		—		166		1,280		28,960		—		166
Single Family		1,916		1,397		652		3,965		68,664		—		1,927
Multifamily		—		—		—		—		4,816		—		—
Consumer —non real estate		76		—		—		76		3,732		—		—


Total loans	$	8,643	$	1,782	$	4,673	$	15,098	$	306,391	$	408	$	10,521


¹		For the purposes of this table only, loans 1-29 days past due are included in the balance of current loans.

When payments are 90 days or more in arrears or when we determine that it is no longer prudent to recognize current interest income on a loan, we classify the loan as non-accrual. At March 31, 2011, three lending relationships were briefly described that were major contributors to the increase in nonaccrual levels as of that date. The first relationship with an aggregate exposure of $4.8 million, continues to make its note payments but its ability to sustain payments through its winter operating season remains in question. The second relationship with an aggregate exposure of $1.7 million that included 14 real estate secured notes, has improved by virtue of the bankruptcy court releasing prior and future rental payments to be applied to 11 of the notes, allowing those notes to move back to accrual status prior to year end 2011. The third relationship, with an aggregate exposure of $2.4 million, is currently in settlement negotiations such that a $1.48 million repayment is now expected as early as September 30, 2011.

From time to time, a loan may be past due 90 days or more but is in the process of collection and thus warrants remaining on accrual status. We had one such loan of $408 thousand at June 30, 2011.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of losses that may be sustained in our loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic principles of accounting: (1) ASC 450-10-05, Contingencies which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimable, and (2) ASC 310-10-35, Receivables which requires that losses be accrued based on the differences between the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows, or values that are observable in the secondary market and the loan balance.

The allowance for loan losses was $5.6 million at June 30, 2011, or 1.75% of loans outstanding, compared to $5.3 million or 1.59% of loans outstanding, at December 31, 2010. We have allocated $1.5 million at June 30, 2011 compared to $873 thousand at December 31, 2010 for specific non-performing loans. For the first six months of 2011, we had net charge-offs of $746 thousand compared to net charge-offs $1.4 million in the same period of 2010.

As part of our routine credit administration process, we engage an outside consulting firm to review our loan portfolio periodically. The information from these reviews is used to monitor individual loans as well as to evaluate the overall adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

In reviewing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses at each period, management takes into consideration the historical loan losses experienced by Bankshares, current economic conditions affecting the borrowers’ ability to repay, the volume of loans, trends in delinquent, nonaccruing, and potential problem loans, and the quality of collateral securing loans. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when we believe that the collection of the principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries of losses previously charged against the allowance are credited to the allowance. After charging off all known losses incurred in the loan portfolio, management considers on a quarterly basis whether the allowance for loan losses remains adequate to cover its estimate of probable future losses, and establishes a provision for loan losses as appropriate. Because the allowance for credit losses is an estimate, as the loan portfolio and allowance for credit losses review process continues to evolve, there may be changes to this estimate and elements used in the methodology used that may have an effect on the overall level of allowance maintained.

The following table represents an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods presented:


	Six Months			Twelve Months			Six Months
	Ended June 30,			December 31,			Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2010

	(dollars in thousands)

Balance, beginning of period	$	5,281		$	5,619		$	5,619

Provision for loan losses		1,075			1,753			950

Chargeoffs:
Commerical and industrial		(10	)		(477	)		(475	)
Construction/land		(404	)		(173	)		(150	)
Residential real estate		(414	)		(1,450	)		(707	)
Commercial real estate		(158	)		(69	)		(70	)
Consumer — non real estate		—			(70	)		(6	)

Total chargeoffs		(986	)		(2,239	)		(1,408	)
Recoveries:
Commerical and industrial		116			10			—
Construction/land		—			18			18
Residential real estate		114			66			7
Commercial real estate		8			35			13
Consumer — non real estate		2			19			4

Total recoveries		240			148			42

Net (chargeoffs)		(746	)		(2,091	)		(1,366	)


Balance, end of period	$	5,610		$	5,281		$	5,203


Allowance for loan losses to total loans		1.75	%		1.59	%		1.52	%
Allowance for loan losses to non-accrual loans		0.53X			2.80X			1.47X
Non-performing assets to allowance for loan losses		285.03	%		177.96	%		221.87	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		2.98	%		1.75	%		1.86	%
Net chargeoffs to average loans		0.46	%		0.61	%		0.77	%

The following table provides a breakdown of the allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan type. However, management does not believe that the allowance for loan losses can be fragmented by category with any precision that would be useful to investors. As such, the entire allowance is available for losses in any particular category, notwithstanding this allocation. The breakdown of the allowance for loan losses is based primarily upon those factors discussed above in computing the allowance for loan losses as a whole. Because all of these factors are subject to change, the allocation and actual results are not necessarily indicative of the exact category of potential loan losses.


	Allowance for Loan Losses
	As of June 30, 2011
	(dollars in thousands)
	Commercial			Commercial			Construction			Residential
	and Industrial			Real Estate			Land			Real Estate			Consumer			Total

Allowance for Loan Losses:
Beginning Balance	$	463		$	1,420		$	700		$	2,613		$	85		$	5,281
Charge-offs		(10	)		(158	)		(404	)		(414	)		—		$	(986	)
Recoveries		116			8			—			114			2		$	240
Provision		(216	)		265			1,186			(126	)		(34	)	$	1,075

Ending Balance:	$	353		$	1,535		$	1,482		$	2,187		$	53		$	5,610


Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	217		$	812		$	504		$	—		$	1,533

Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	353		$	1,318		$	670		$	1,683		$	53		$	4,077


Loans:
Ending Balance:	$	27,317		$	143,133		$	39,546		$	107,685		$	3,808		$	321,489


Individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,067		$	2,792		$	4,569		$	2,093		$	—		$	10,521

Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	26,250		$	140,341		$	34,977		$	105,592		$	3,808		$	310,968

Nonperforming Assets

Impaired Loans (Loans with a Specific Allowance Allocation). As of June 30, 2011, there were no loans with impairment allocations that were not also in non-accrual status. At December 31, 2010, a $2.4 million loan was carried as impaired which was subsequently placed on non-accrual status in the first quarter of 2011.

Non-accrual Loans. A loan may be placed on non-accrual status when the loan is specifically determined to be impaired or when principal or interest is delinquent 90 days or more. We closely monitor individual loans, and relationship officers are charged with working with customers to resolve potential credit issues in a timely manner with minimum exposure to

Bankshares. We maintain a policy of adding an appropriate amount to the allowance for loan losses to ensure an adequate reserve based on the portfolio composition, specific credit extended by the Bank, general economic conditions and other factors and external circumstances identified during the process of estimating probable losses in the Company’s loan portfolio.

On June 30, 2011, there was $10.5 million in loans on non-accrual status compared to $1.9 at December 31, 2010 and $3.5 million at June 30, 2010. The $10.5 million non-accrual loan balance consists mostly of loans secured by residential and commercial real estate in the Northern Virginia area. The specific allowance for impaired loans as of June 30, 2011 is $1.5 million.

The increase in non-accruals during the first quarter of 2011 is attributable to three relationships. The largest is $4.8 million, which includes a Commercial and Industrial relationship with two related real estate loans. This substandard credit displayed signs of additional weakness during the six months ended June 30, 2011, although scheduled payments continue to be made. The second relationship placed on non-accrual status totals $1.7 million which consists of 14 mortgage loans secured by small income properties. The third relationship of $2.4 million classified as impaired at December 31, 2010, was subsequently added to non-accrual in the first quarter of 2011. In each of these cases, Bankshares believes that the appropriate strategy was applied to move these loans to non-accrual given the circumstances reflected in the individual relationships. These relationships originated in 2006 or earlier. Strategies to resolve these loan situations are being actively pursued which management believes will reduce the loan amounts and/or risk exposure attributable to these situations prior to the end of 2011.

Total Non-Performing Assets. As of June 30, 2011, we had $16.0 million of non-performing assets on the balance sheet compared to $9.4 million as of December 31, 2010, an increase of $6.6 million. This increase is due to the addition of several non-accrual lending relationships and troubled debt restructurings during the first quarter of 2011. The ratio of non-performing assets to total assets increased to 2.98% as of June 30, 2011 from 1.75% as of December 31, 2010, a 123 basis point increase.

The following table provides information regarding credit quality at the dates presented:


	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,
	2011			2010			2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Credit Quality Information
Non-performing assets:
Accruing impaired loans	$	—		$	2,400		$	541
Non-Accrual loans		10,521			1,903			3,537
Total loans past due 90 days and still accruing		408			256			—
Troubled debt restructurings		749			212			—
OREO		4,312			4,627			7,366

Total non-performing assets	$	15,990		$	9,398		$	11,444


Specific reserves associated with impaired loans	$	1,533		$	873		$	938


Non-performing assets to total assets		2.98	%		1.75	%		1.86	%

Specific Reserves. As of June 30, 2011, we had $1.5 million in specific reserves for non-performing loans, compared to $873 thousand at December 31, 2010.

Other Real Estate Owned (OREO). As of June 30, 2011, we had $4.3 million classified as OREO on the balance sheet, compared to $4.6 million as of December 31, 2010 and $7.4 million at June 30, 2010. The OREO balance includes $1.5 million which relates to residential acreage in the Winchester, Virginia area, $879 thousand which relates to residential building lots in Woodstock, Virginia, and $837 thousand which relates to residential building lots in Charles Town, West Virginia. The remainder is made up of six additional properties totaling $1.1 million at June 30, 2011.

The table below reflects the OREO activity in the periods presented:


	Six Months			Twelve Months			Six Months
	Ended June 30,			Ended December 31,			Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of period	$	4,627		$	7,875		$	7,875

Properties acquired at foreclosure		434			1,973			1,600
Capital improvements on foreclosed properti		—			55			—
Sales of foreclosed properties		(749	)		(4,918	)		(2,109	)
Valuation adjustments		—			(358	)		—


Balance, end of period	$	4,312		$	4,627		$	7,366

Deposits. We seek deposits within our market area by offering high-quality customer service, using technology to deliver deposit services effectively and paying competitive interest rates. A significant portion of our client base and deposits are directly related to home sales and refinancing activity, including from title and escrow agency customers.

At June 30, 2011, the deposit portfolio was $412.0 million, an increase of $5.1 million compared to the December 31, 2010 level of $406.9 million. The interest-bearing deposits on average cost the Bank 1.58% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, or 57 basis points less than the six months ended June 30, 2010 average cost of 2.15%. As key interest rates declined over the past year, we repriced deposits at lower levels.

At June 30, 2011, our non-interest bearing demand deposits were $130.8 million compared to $124.6 million at December 31, 2010, a $6.2 million increase. Average non-interest bearing demand deposits were $89.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to average demand deposits of $91.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $2.1 million. The disparity between the June 30, 2011 balance of non-interest bearing deposits of $130.8 million and the average balance for the first six months of 2011 of non-interest bearing deposits of $89.5 million is directly related to seasonal and cyclical changes in the business activities of our

title and escrow agency client base. Frequently, our title and escrow agency clients experience strong deposit growth around the end of a month or quarter.

We currently use wholesale brokered deposits. We believe these types of funds offer a reliable stable source of funds for the Bank. Frequently the interest rates associated with wholesale brokered deposits are significantly lower than general customer rates in our markets. As market conditions warrant and balance sheet needs dictate, we may continue to participate in the wholesale brokered certificate of deposit market. As with any deposit product, we have potential risk for non-renewal by the customer and/or broker.

As of June 30, 2011, we had $122.5 million of wholesale brokered certificates of deposit which is $22.5 million higher than the December 31, 2010 level of $100.0 million. This increase is due to management utilizing these instruments to lengthen the duration of the liabilities on the balance sheet in advance of some expected maturities in 2011.

The following table shows the maturity distribution and coupon rate of wholesale brokered certificate of deposits at June 30, 2011:


Maturity Distribution of Brokered Deposits by Year
Maturity			Average Coupon
Year	Amount		Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
2011	$	12,500		2.00	%
2012		40,000		1.55	%
2013		37,562		1.53	%
2014		22,423		1.58	%
2015		10,000		1.90	%

	$	122,485		1.62	%

Purchased Funds and Other Borrowings. Purchased funds and other borrowings include repurchase agreements (repos), which we offer to commercial customers and affluent individuals, federal funds purchased and treasury, tax and loan balances. The bulk of purchased funds are made up of the following four categories: customer repos, outstanding federal funds purchased, the Trust Preferred Capital Notes and FHLB advances. Customer repos amounted to $33.9 million at June 30, 2011, compared to $43.1 million at December 31, 2010 and $33.1 million at June 30, 2010. FHLB advances amounted to $41.3 million at June 30, 2011, compared to $41.2 million at December 31, 2010 and $51.2 million at June 30, 2010. Other borrowings were $0, $549 thousand and $6 thousand at June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively. The Trust Preferred Capital Notes were $10.3 million for all periods presented.


	Six Months			Twelve Months			Six Months
	Ended June 30,			Ended December 31,			Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2010
	(dollars in thousands)
At Period End
FHLB long-term advances, at fair value	$	26,281		$	26,208		$	26,223
FHLB long-term advances		15,000			15,000			25,000
Customer repos		33,882			43,148			33,119
Purchased funds and other borrowings		—			5			6
Trust Preferred Capital Notes		10,310			10,310			10,310

Total at period end	$	85,473		$	94,671		$	94,658


Average Balances
FHLB long-term advances, at fair value	$	26,132		$	26,196		$	25,900
FHLB long-term advances		15,000			28,105			34,945
Customer repos		32,440			35,759			31,983
Purchased funds and other borrowings		—			9,133			18,065
Trust Preferred Capital Notes		10,310			10,310			10,310

Total average balance	$	83,882		$	109,503		$	121,203


Average rate paid on all borrowed funds, end of period		1.82	%		1.77	%		1.61	%


Average rate paid on all borrowed funds, during the period		1.62	%		1.69	%		2.98	%


Maximum outstanding during period	$	118,741		$	126,156		$	119,137

Customer repurchase agreements are standard commercial banking transactions that involve a Bank customer instead of a wholesale bank or broker. We offer this product as an accommodation to larger retail and commercial customers and affluent individuals that request safety for their funds beyond the FDIC deposit insurance limits. We believe this product offers us a stable source of financing at a reasonable market rate of interest. We do not use or have any open repurchase agreements with any broker-dealers.

The FHLB is a key source of funding for the Bank. During the periods presented, we have used overnight advances (daily rate credit) to support our short-term liquidity needs. On a longer term basis, we augment our funding portfolio with our two FHLB advances, one of which is accounted for on a fair value basis, and one of which is accounted for on a cost basis.

At June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, the FHLB long-term advance accounted for on a fair value basis had a value of $26.3 million, $26.2 million and $26.2 million respectively, and matures in 2021. The weighted average interest rate on the long-term FHLB advance accounted for on a fair value basis was 3.985% for all periods presented. The par value of the FHLB advance accounted for on a fair value basis was $25.0 million at June 30, 2011, December 31 2010, and June 30, 2010.

At June 30, 2011, there was one FHLB advance accounted for on a cost basis. Bankshares entered into this floating rate advance in the first quarter of 2010 for $15.0 million. The advance matures in 2012 and the interest rate at June 30, 2011 was 0.159%. The weighted average interest rate for both FHLB advances at June 30, 2011 is 2.550%.

Trading Liabilities Classified as Level 3. Beginning in the third quarter of 2008 and continuing through the present time, portions of the investment and debt markets have experienced a period of significant distress and dysfunction, and market values for certain financial instruments may not be readily available. Although certain portions of the investment and debt markets have improved, the fair value of an instrument may not be the same as a liquidation value. In evaluating the fair value of funding instruments, we determined that the typical valuation techniques did not take into account the distressed investment and debt markets. As such, we considered other factors such as typical spreads for the instruments, option adjusted spreads, swap curves, discounted cashflow models, previously observable non-distressed valuations and bond issuance rates and spreads for investment and non-investment grade instruments. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of the long-term FHLB advance accounted for on a fair value basis was $26.3 million and $26.2 million respectively.

The following table reflects the fair value of liabilities accounted for under ASC 820-10 as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2011							December 31, 2010							June 30, 2010
	Par		Fair					Par		Fair					Par		Fair
	Value		Value		Yield			Value		Value		Yield			Value		Value		Yield
	(dollars in thousands)
FHLB long-term advance	$	25,000	$	26,281		3.99	%	$	25,000	$	26,208		3.99	%	$	25,000	$	26,223		3.99	%

Liquidity. Bankshares specifically focuses on liquidity management to meet the demand for funds from our depositors and lending clients as well as expenses that we incur in the operation of our business. We have a formal liquidity management policy and a contingency funding policy used to assist management in executing the liquidity strategies necessary for the Bank. Similar to other banking organizations, the Bank monitors the need for funds to support depositor activities and funding of loans. Our client base includes a significant number of title and escrow businesses which have more deposit inflows and outflows than a traditional commercial business relationship. The Bank maintains additional liquidity sources to support the needs of this client base. As noted in the risk factors section of Bankshares’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the forward- looking statement section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, loss of relationship officers or clients could have a material impact on our liquidity position through a reduction in average deposits.

Our funding department and Interim Chief Financial Officer and Controller monitor our overall liquidity position daily. We can and will draw upon federal funds lines with correspondent banks, draw upon reverse repurchase agreement lines with correspondent banks and use FHLB advances as needed. Our deposit customers frequently have lower deposit balances in the middle of the month, and balances generally rise toward the end of each month. As such, we use wholesale funding techniques to support our balance sheet and asset portfolios,

although our longer term plan is to increase deposits from our local retail and commercial deposits and maintain available wholesale funding sources as additional liquidity.

As of June 30, 2011, Bankshares had $62.4 million in cash to support the business activities and deposit flows of our clients. The Bank maintains credit lines at the FHLB and other correspondent banks. At June 30, 2011, the Bank had a total credit line of $105.4 million with the FHLB with an unused portion of $65.4 million. Borrowings with the FHLB have certain collateral requirements and are subject to disbursement approval by the FHLB. At June 30, 2011, the Bank had $30.0 million in secured borrowing capacity and $4.0 million in unsecured borrowing capacity (both reverse repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased) from correspondent banks. As of June 30, 2011, the Bank did not have any outstanding borrowings from its correspondent banks. All borrowings from correspondent banks are subject to disbursement approval. The Bank is also eligible to borrow from the Federal Reserve Discount Window subject to the collateral requirements and other terms and conditions that may exist. In addition to the borrowing capacity described above, Bankshares and the Bank may sell investment securities, loans and other assets to generate additional liquidity. We anticipate maintaining sufficient liquidity to protect depositors, provide for business growth and comply with regulatory requirements.

Capital

Both Bankshares and the Bank are considered “well capitalized” under the risk-based capital guidelines adopted by the federal banking regulatory agencies. Capital adequacy is an important measure of financial stability. Maintaining a “well capitalized” regulatory position is paramount for each organization. Both Bankshares and the Bank monitor the capital positions to ensure appropriate capital for the respective risk profile of each organization, as well as sufficient levels to promote depositor and investor confidence in the respective organizations.

Total stockholders’ equity was $35.8 million as of June 30, 2011 compared to the December 31, 2010 level of $33.7 million. The change in equity is primarily attributable to our net income for 2011 of $759 thousand and unrealized gains on securities of $1.3 million. Book value per common share was $7.00 as of June 30, 2011, compared to $6.60 as of December 31, 2010. The net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities amounted to $1.0 million, net of tax as of June 30, 2011, compared to a net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities of $288 thousand, net of tax as of December 31, 2010.

The following table reflects the components of stockholders equity on a book value per share basis.


	Six Months		Twelve Months			Six Months
	Ended June 30,		Ended December 31,			Ended June 30,
	2011		2010			2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Book Value Per Share, beginning of the period	$	6.60	$	6.49		$	6.49

Net income per common share		0.15		0.14			0.06
Effects of changes in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)¹		0.25		(0.03	)		0.43


Book Value Per Share, end of the period	$	7.00	$	6.60		$	6.98


¹		Other Comprehensive Income represents the unrealized gains or losses associated with available-for-sale secutities and related reclassification adjustments.

Payment of dividends is at the discretion of Bankshares’ Board of Directors and is subject to various federal and state regulatory limitations. It is our current policy to retain earnings to support our banking operations and our business risk profile. In addition, the terms of the Merger Agreement restrict Bankshares from declaring, setting aside or paying any dividends or other distributions on any class of its capital stock without the consent of Eagle while the Merger is pending.

On June 30, 2003, Bankshares’ wholly-owned Delaware statutory business trust privately issued $10.0 million face amount of the trust’s floating rate trust preferred capital securities (Trust Preferred Capital Notes) in a pooled trust preferred capital securities offering. The trust issued $310 thousand in common equity to Bankshares. Simultaneously, the trust used the proceeds of the sale to purchase $10.3 million principal amount of Bankshares’ floating rate junior subordinated debentures due 2033 (Subordinated Debentures). Both the Trust Preferred Capital Notes and the Subordinated Debentures are callable at any time. The Subordinated Debentures are an unsecured obligation of Bankshares and are junior in right of payment to all present and future senior indebtedness of Bankshares. The Trust Preferred Capital Notes are guaranteed by Bankshares on a subordinated basis. The Trust Preferred Capital Notes are presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets of Bankshares under the caption “Trust Preferred Capital Notes.” Bankshares records distributions payable on the Trust Preferred Capital Notes as an interest expense in its Consolidated Statements of Operations. The interest rate associated with the Trust Preferred Capital Notes is three month LIBOR plus 3.15% subject to quarterly interest rate adjustments. Under the indenture governing the Trust Preferred Capital Notes, Bankshares has the right to defer payments of interest for up to twenty consecutive quarterly periods. Beginning with the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and through June 30, 2011, Bankshares elected to defer the interest payments as permitted under the indenture. The interest deferred under the indenture compounds quarterly at the interest rate then in effect. As of June 30, 2011 the total amount of deferred and compounded interest owed under the indenture is $759 thousand. The base interest rate as of June 30, 2011 was 3.40% and as of December 31, 2010 was 3.45%.

All or a portion of Trust Preferred Capital Notes may be included in the regulatory computation of capital adequacy as Tier 1 capital. Under the current guidelines, Tier 1 capital

may include up to 25% of stockholders’ equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the form of Trust Preferred Capital Notes. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the entire amount was considered Tier 1 capital. Management does not expect the restrictions on Tier 1 capital treatment of trust preferred securities that were enacted by the Dodd-Frank Act to impact the Tier 1 capital status of the Trust Preferred Capital Notes, as the Dodd-Frank Act’s restrictions generally do not apply to trust preferred securities issued prior to enactment by institutions with fewer than $15 billion in assets.

Bankshares is considered “well capitalized” as of June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010. The following table shows our capital categories, capital ratios and the minimum capital ratios currently required by bank regulators:


	Risk Based Capital Analysis
	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,
	2011			2010			2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Tier 1 Capital:
Common stock	$	20,436		$	20,427		$	20,427
Capital surplus		25,854			25,857			25,822
Retained (deficit)		(11,552	)		(12,311	)		(12,712	)
Less: disallowed assets		(4,504	)		(2,990	)		(4,303	)
Add: Qualifying Trust Preferred Securities		10,000			10,000			10,000

Total Tier 1 capital		40,234			40,983			39,234

Tier 2 Capital:
Qualifying allowance for loan losses		4,152			4,400			4,634

Total Tier 2 capital		4,152			4,400			4,634


Total Risk Based Capital	$	44,386		$	45,383		$	43,868


Risk weighted assets	$	331,934		$	352,277		$	371,164


Quarterly average assets	$	485,310		$	547,008		$	558,742


	June 30,			December 31,			June 30,			Regulatory
	2011			2010			2010			Minimum

Capital Ratios:
Tier 1 risk based capital ratio		12.1	%		11.6	%		10.6	%		4.0	%
Total risk based capital ratio		13.4	%		12.9	%		11.8	%		8.0	%
Leverage ratio		8.3	%		7.5	%		7.0	%		4.0	%

The regulatory risk based capital guidelines establish minimum capital levels for the Bank to be deemed “well capitalized.” The guidelines for “well capitalized” call for a leverage ratio of 5.0%, tier 1 risk based capital ratio of 6.0% and total risk based capital ratio of 10.0%. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had capital ratios of 8.3%, 12.1% and 13.4%, respectively, all in excess of the regulatory minimums to be “well capitalized.” The Bank and Bankshares continuously monitor the capital levels and the risk profile of the entities to determine if capital levels are sufficient for the risk profiles of the organization.

The ratio of net income to average assets and average equity and certain other ratios are as follows for the periods indicated:


	Three			Six			Twelve
	Months Ended			Months Ended			Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2011			2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Average total assets	$	489,814		$	501,238		$	558,945

Average stockholders’ equity	$	34,581		$	34,102		$	37,395

Net income	$	394		$	759		$	705

Cash dividends declared	$	—		$	—		$	—

Return on average assets (annualized)		0.32	%		0.31	%		0.13	%

Return on average stockholders’ equity (annualized)		4.57	%		4.49	%		1.89	%

Average stockholders’ equity to average total assets		7.06	%		6.80	%		6.69	%

Concentrations. Substantially all of Bankshares’ loans, commitments and standby letters of credit have been granted to customers located in the greater Washington, D.C. Metropolitan region, primarily in the Northern Virginia area. Bankshares’ overall business includes a significant focus on real estate activities, including real estate lending, title companies and real estate settlement businesses. As of June 30, 2011, commercial real estate loans were 44.5% and residential real estate loans were 33.5% of the total gross loan portfolio. In addition, a substantial portion of our noninterest bearing deposits is generated by our title and escrow company clients. As of June 30, 2011, the noninterest bearing deposits were 31.8% of total deposits. The impact of the title and escrow company concentration can create more volatility in our funding mix, especially during periods of declines in the real estate market, which can have an impact on organizational profitability.

Off-Balance Sheet Activities

As of June 30, 2011, there are no material changes to the off-balance sheet arrangements disclosed in Bankshares’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements — In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” ASU 2010-06 amends Subtopic 820-10 to clarify existing disclosures, require new disclosures, and includes conforming amendments to guidance on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures

are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on Bankshares’ consolidated financial statements.

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, “Receivables (Topic 310) — Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” The new disclosure guidance significantly expands the existing requirements and will lead to greater transparency into a company’s exposure to credit losses from lending arrangements. The extensive new disclosures of information as of the end of a reporting period became effective for both interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. Specific disclosures regarding activity that occurred before the issuance of the ASU, such as the allowance roll forward and modification disclosures will be required for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Bankshares has included the required disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, “Intangible — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) — When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” The amendments in this ASU modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on Bankshares’ consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) — Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.” The guidance requires pro forma disclosure for business combinations that occurred in the current reporting period as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the year had been as of the beginning of the annual reporting period. If comparative financial statements are presented, the pro forma information should be reported as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the current year had been as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. ASU 2010-29 is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on Bankshares’ consolidated financial statements.

The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Final Rule No. 33-9002, “Interactive Data to Improve Financial Reporting.” The rule requires companies to submit financial statements in extensible business reporting language (XBRL) format with their SEC filings on a phased-in schedule. Large accelerated filers and foreign large accelerated filers using U.S. GAAP were required to provide interactive data reports starting with their first quarterly report for fiscal periods ending on or after June 15, 2010. All remaining filers are required to provide interactive data reports starting with their first quarterly report for fiscal periods ending on or after June 15, 2011. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on Bankshares’ consolidated financial statements.

In March 2011, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 114. This SAB revises or rescinds portions of the interpretive guidance included in the codification of the Staff Accounting Bulletin Series. This update is intended to make the relevant interpretive guidance consistent with current authoritative accounting guidance issued as a part of the FASB’s Codification. The principal changes involve revision or removal of accounting guidance references and other conforming changes to ensure consistency of referencing through the SAB Series. The effective date for SAB 114 is March 28, 2011. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on Bankshares’ consolidated financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, “Receivables (Topic 310) — A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.” The amendments in this ASU clarify the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether it has granted a concession to a debtor. They also clarify the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulty. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. Retrospective application to the beginning of the annual period of adoption for modifications occurring on or after the beginning of the annual adoption period is required. As a result of applying these amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered to be impaired. For purposes of measuring impairment of those receivables, an entity should apply the amendments prospectively for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. Bankshares has adopted ASU 2011-02 and will include the required disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, “Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) — Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements.” The amendments in this ASU remove from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The guidance should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. Bankshares is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2011-03 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) — Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” This ASU is the result of joint efforts by the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board to develop a single, converged fair value framework on how (not when) to measure fair value and what disclosures to provide about fair value measurements. The ASU is largely consistent with existing fair value measurement principles in U.S. GAAP (Topic 820), with many of the amendments made to eliminate unnecessary wording differences between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The amendments are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with prospective application. Early application is not permitted. Bankshares is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2011-04 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) — Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” The objective of this ASU is to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The single statement of comprehensive income should include the components of net income, a total for net income, the components of other comprehensive income, a total for other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present all the components of other comprehensive income, a total for other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income. The amendments do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income, the option for an entity to present components of other comprehensive income either net of related tax effects or before related tax effects, or the calculation or reporting of earnings per share. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively. The amendments are effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted because compliance with the amendments is already permitted. The amendments do not require transition disclosures. Bankshares is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2011-05 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Asset Liability Management (ALM) Risk Management. We engage a consulting firm to model our short-term and long-term interest rate risk profile. The model includes basic business assumptions, interest rates, repricing information and other relevant market data necessary to project our interest rate risk. The Board of Directors has established interest rate risk limits for both short-term and long-term interest rate exposure. On a periodic basis, management reports to the Board of Directors on our base interest rate risk profile and expectations of changes in the profiles based on certain interest rate shocks.

Net Interest Income (NII) Sensitivity (Short-term Interest Rate Risk). Bankshares’ ALM process evaluates the effect of upward and downward changes in market interest rates on future net interest income. This analysis involves shocking the interest rates used in determining net interest income over the next twelve months. The resulting percentage change in net interest income in various rate scenarios is an indication of Bankshares’ shorter-term interest rate risk. This analysis is accomplished by assuming a static balance sheet over a period of time with maturing and repayment dollars being rolled back into like instruments for new terms at current market rates. Additional assumptions are applied to modify volumes and pricing under various rate scenarios. These assumptions include prepayments, the sensitivity of non-maturity deposit rates, and other factors deemed significant by Bankshares.

The ALM model results for June 30, 2011 are shown in the table below. Assuming an immediate upward shift in market interest rates of 100 basis points, the results indicate Bankshares would expect net interest income to increase over the next twelve months by 4.8%.

Assuming a shift downward of 100 basis points, Bankshares would expect net interest income to decrease over the next twelve months by 2.2%.

Economic Value of Equity (Long-term Interest Rate Risk). The economic value of equity process models the cashflows of financial instruments to maturity. The model incorporates growth and pricing assumptions to develop a baseline Economic Value of Equity (EVE). The interest rates used in the model are then shocked for an immediate increase or decrease in interest rates. The results of the shocked model are compared to the baseline results to determine the percentage change in EVE under the various scenarios. The resulting percentage change in EVE is an indication of the longer term repricing risk and options embedded in the balance sheet.

The table below shows as of June 30, 2011, ALM model results under various interest rate shocks:


	June 30, 2011
Interest Rate Shocks	NII			EVE
-200 bp		-7.2	%		1.5	%
-100 bp		-2.2	%		0.9	%
+100 bp		4.8	%		-2.2	%
+200 bp		9.8	%		-2.9	%

All results above are within Bankshares current interest rate risk policy guidelines.

Interest Rate Gap. In addition to the NII and EVE models, management reviews our “static” gap position. The cumulative negative gap position within one year was $45.1 million, or 8.4% of total assets, at June 30, 2011. While this measurement technique is common in the financial services industry, it has limitations and is not our sole tool for measuring interest rate sensitivity. We do not believe this model accurately reflects Bankshares’ true short-term and long-term interest rate exposure. As an example, $90.0 million of the investment and trading securities at June 30, 2011 are classified as greater than five years due to the contractual maturity of the instruments. Investment and trading securities are easily marketed and can be liquidated in a short period of time. As a result, it is reasonable to consider a portion of, or perhaps all of, the $90.0 million of investment and trading securities as the “within three month” category, which further suggests a more balanced short-term interest rate position for Bankshares.

The following table reflects our June 30, 2011 “static” interest rate gap position:


	June 30, 2011
	Maturing or Repricing
	Within			4 - 12			1 -5			Over
	3 Months			Months			Years			5 Years			Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest earning assets:
Investment securities	$	—		$	—		$	19,553		$	89,252		$	108,805
Trading securities		—			—			—			658			658
Loans^*		49,659			48,396			134,651			78,262			310,968
Interest-bearing deposits		60,835			—			—			—			60,835
Federal funds sold		20,359			—			—			—			20,359

Total interest earning assets		130,853			48,396			154,204			168,172			501,625


Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits		54,675			—			—			—			54,675
Money market deposit accounts		23,933			—			—			—			23,933
Savings accounts		2,958			—			—			—			2,958
Time deposits		26,872			56,756			116,000			—			199,628

Total interest-bearing deposits		108,438			56,756			116,000			—			281,194

FHLB long term advances, at fair value		—			—			—			26,281			26,281
FHLB long term advances		15,000			—			—			—			15,000
Customer repurchase agreements		33,882			—			—			—			33,882
Trust Preferred Capital Notes		10,310			—			—			—			10,310

Total interest-bearing liabilities		167,630			56,756			116,000			26,281			366,667


Period Gap	$	(36,777	)	$	(8,360	)	$	38,204		$	141,891		$	134,958


Cumulative Gap	$	(36,777	)	$	(45,137	)	$	(6,933	)	$	134,958		$	134,958


Cumulative Gap / Total Assets		-6.8	%		-8.4	%		-1.3	%		25.1	%		25.1	%


*		Excludes nonaccrual assets of $10.5 million.

Interest Rate Risk Management Summary. As part of our interest rate risk management, we typically use the trading and investment portfolios and our wholesale funding instruments to balance our interest rate exposure. There is no guarantee that the risk management techniques and balance sheet management strategies we employ will be effective in periods of rapid rate movements or extremely volatile periods. We believe our strategies are prudent and within our policy guidelines in the base case of our modeling efforts as of June 30, 2011.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

We have disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and regulations, and that such information is accumulated

and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of June 30, 2011.

Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures will detect or uncover every situation involving the failure of persons within Bankshares to disclose material information required to be set forth in our periodic reports.

The resignation of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter has not materially affected, nor is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting due to the necessary reassignment of the duties of that office to the Interim Chief Financial Officer. The resulting changes in the Company’s internal control structure will not affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising in the normal course of our business. In the opinion of management final disposition of any pending or threatened legal matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Termination of the Merger Agreement could negatively impact Bankshares.

If the Merger Agreement is terminated and the parties fail to consummate the Merger, there may be various negative consequences to Bankshares and the Bank. For example, Bankshares businesses may have been impacted adversely by the failure to pursue other beneficial opportunities due to the focus of management on the Merger, without realizing any of the anticipated benefits of completing the Merger. If the Merger Agreement is terminated and Bankshares’ board of directors seeks another merger or business combination, shareholders of Bankshares cannot be certain that Bankshares will be able to find a party willing to pay the equivalent or greater consideration than that which Eagle has agreed to pay with respect to the Merger. In addition, under certain circumstances, the termination of the Merger Agreement may require Bankshares to pay to Eagle a termination fee in the amount of $1.35 million.

Bankshares will be subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the Merger is pending.

Uncertainty about the effect of the Merger on employees and customers may have an adverse effect on Bankshares. These uncertainties may impair Bankshares’ ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the Merger is completed, and could cause customers and others that deal with Bankshares to seek to change existing business relationships with the Bank. Retention of certain employees by Bankshares may be challenging while the Merger is pending, as certain employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with the Bank. If key employees depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with Bankshares and the Bank, Bankshare’s business following the Merger could be harmed. In addition, subject to certain exceptions, Bankshares has agreed to operate its business in the ordinary course prior to closing.

Combining the two companies may be more difficult, costly or time-consuming than expected.

Eagle and Bankshares have operated and, until the completion of the Merger, will continue to operate, independently. The success of the Merger will depend, in part, on our ability to successfully combine the businesses of Eagle and Bankshares. To realize these anticipated benefits, after the completion of the Merger Eagle expects to integrate

Bankshares’ business into its own. It is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of key employees, the disruption of each company’s ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect the combined company’s ability to maintain relationships with clients, customers, depositors and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the Merger. The loss of key employees could adversely affect Eagle’s ability to successfully conduct its business in the markets in which Bankshares now operates, which could have an adverse effect on Eagle’s financial results and the value of its common stock. If Eagle experiences difficulties with the integration process, the anticipated benefits of the Merger may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected. As with any merger of financial institutions, there also may be business disruptions that cause the Bank to lose customers or cause customers to remove their accounts from the Bank and move their business to competing financial institutions. Integration efforts between Eagle and Bankshares will also divert management attention and resources. These integration matters could have an adverse effect on each of Bankshares and Eagle during this transition period and for an undetermined period after consummation of the Merger.

Our ability to complete the Merger with Eagle is subject to the receipt of consents and approvals from regulatory agencies which may impose conditions that could adversely affect us or cause the Merger to be abandoned.

Before the Merger may be completed, we must obtain various approvals or consents from the Federal Reserve Board and various bank regulatory and other authorities. These regulators may impose conditions on the completion of the Merger or require changes to the terms of the Merger. Although Eagle and Bankshares do not currently expect that any such conditions or changes would be imposed, there can be no assurance that they will not be, and such conditions or changes could have the effect of delaying completion of the Merger or imposing additional costs on or limiting the revenues of Eagle following the Merger. There can be no assurance as to whether the regulatory approvals will be received, the timing of those approvals, or whether any conditions will be imposed.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

	2.1		Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between Alliance Bankshares Corporation and Alliance Bank Corporation, dated as of May 22, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.0 to Form 8-K12g-3 filed August 21, 2002).

	2.2		Agreement of Merger between Eagle Bancorp, Inc., Alliance Bankshares Corporation and Alliance Bank Corporation, dated as of July 27, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2011)

	2.4		Stock Purchase Agreement between Alliance Bank Corporation, as the seller, and Thomas P. Danaher and Oswald H. Skewes, as the purchasers, dated as of December 29, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to Form 10-K filed May 28, 2010).

	3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Alliance Bankshares Corporation (as amended July 6, 2006) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q filed August 14, 2006).

	3.2		Bylaws of Alliance Bankshares Corporation (amended and restated as of December 19, 2007) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K filed December 27, 2007).

	10.15		Consulting Agreement between Alliance Bankshares Corporation, Alliance Bank Corporation and Paul M. Harbolick, Jr., dated as of May 16, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Form 10-Q filed May 16, 2011).

	31.1		Certification of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).

	31.2		Certification of Interim CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).

	32		Certification of CEO and Interim CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

	101		The following materials from Alliance Bankshares Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language), furnished herewith: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited), (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited), and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

ALLIANCE BANKSHARES CORPORATION
(Registrant)


August 12, 2011		/s/ William E. Doyle, Jr.
Date		William E. Doyle, Jr.
		President & Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

August 12, 2011		/s/ Jean S. Houpert
Date		Jean S. Houpert
		Senior Vice President &
		Interim Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

ALLIANCE BANKSHARES CORP - FORM 10-Q - August 12, 2011

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

ALLIANCE BANKSHARES CORP Reports

Also read