Attached files

file filename
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - GASCO ENERGY INCa11-13071_1ex32d2.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - GASCO ENERGY INCa11-13071_1ex31d2.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - GASCO ENERGY INCa11-13071_1ex32d1.htm
EX-10.1 - EX-10.1 - GASCO ENERGY INCa11-13071_1ex10d1.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - GASCO ENERGY INCa11-13071_1ex31d1.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - GASCO ENERGY INCFinancial_Report.xls

Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

 

OR

 

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM         TO       

 

Commission File Number: 001-32369

 

GASCO ENERGY, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada

 

98-0204105

(State or other jurisdiction of

 

(IRS Employer

incorporation or organization)

 

Identification No.)

 

8 Inverness Drive East, Suite 100, Englewood, Colorado

 

80112

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

(303) 483-0044

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer x

 

Smaller reporting company o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  o No x

 

Number of common shares outstanding as of August 9, 2011: 168,013,515

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents

 

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements (Unaudited)

3

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

3

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

5

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

7

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

8

 

 

 

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations

26

 

 

 

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

40

 

 

 

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

41

 

 

 

PART II —OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

42

 

 

 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

42

 

 

 

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

44

 

 

 

Item 6.

Exhibits

44

 

Please refer to the section entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” at the end of Part I, Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 (“Quarterly Report”) for a discussion of factors which could affect the outcome of forward-looking statements used in this Quarterly Report.

 

2



Table of Contents

 

ITEM I — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PART 1 — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

GASCO ENERGY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

6,125,371

 

$

1,994,542

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

 

 

 

Joint interest billings

 

1,445,621

 

1,296,719

 

Revenue

 

2,333,225

 

2,423,114

 

Inventory

 

1,806,960

 

1,773,079

 

Derivative instruments

 

 

193,959

 

Prepaid expenses

 

73,761

 

121,637

 

Total

 

11,784,938

 

7,803,050

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, at cost

 

 

 

 

 

Oil and gas properties (full cost method)

 

 

 

 

 

Proved properties

 

265,613,614

 

263,104,555

 

Unproved properties

 

36,659,642

 

35,941,100

 

Facilities and equipment

 

1,060,220

 

1,120,134

 

Furniture, fixtures and other

 

183,052

 

240,659

 

Total

 

303,516,528

 

300,406,448

 

Less accumulated depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment

 

(232,432,433

)

(230,701,994

)

Total

 

71,084,095

 

69,704,454

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Deposit

 

639,500

 

639,500

 

Derivative instruments

 

19,643

 

 

Note receivable

 

500,000

 

500,000

 

Deferred financing costs

 

1,275,910

 

1,363,425

 

Total

 

2,435,053

 

2,502,925

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

 

$

85,304,086

 

$

80,010,429

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

GASCO ENERGY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

765,661

 

$

2,111,192

 

Revenue payable

 

3,897,035

 

2,598,693

 

Advances from joint interest owners

 

132,166

 

1,164,414

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

8,544,969

 

 

5.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2011

 

400,000

 

400,000

 

Accrued interest

 

591,751

 

591,751

 

Derivative instruments

 

25,193

 

 

Accrued expenses

 

611,525

 

1,191,000

 

Total

 

14,968,300

 

8,057,050

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NONCURRENT LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

5.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015, net of unamortized discount of $24,242,242 as of June 30, 2011 and $25,682,482 as of December 31, 2010

 

20,925,758

 

19,485,516

 

Long-term debt

 

 

6,544,969

 

Deferred income from sale of assets

 

2,766,855

 

2,868,081

 

Asset retirement obligation

 

1,171,209

 

1,119,561

 

Derivative instruments

 

1,687,500

 

 

Total

 

26,551,322

 

30,018,127

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Series B Convertible Preferred stock - $0.001 par value; 20,000 shares authorized; zero shares outstanding

 

 

 

Series C Convertible Preferred stock - $0.001 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; 191,000 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and 225,600 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2010

 

191

 

226

 

Common stock - $.0001 par value; 600,000,000 shares authorized; 152,013,515 shares issued and 151,939,815 outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and 121,255,748 shares issued and 121,182,048 outstanding as of December 31, 2010

 

15,201

 

12,126

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

260,735,795

 

257,327,315

 

Accumulated deficit

 

(216,836,428

)

(215,274,120

)

Less cost of treasury stock of 73,700 common shares

 

(130,295

)

(130,295

)

Total

 

43,784,464

 

41,935,252

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

$

85,304,086

 

$

80,010,429

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

GASCO ENERGY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

Gas

 

$

4,609,574

 

$

4,234,472

 

Oil

 

1,145,897

 

710,419

 

Total

 

5,755,471

 

4,944,891

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

Lease operating

 

1,707,734

 

1,529,152

 

Transportation and processing

 

901,384

 

884,953

 

Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion

 

985,744

 

1,070,229

 

Gain on sale of assets, net

 

 

(49,754

)

General and administrative

 

945,342

 

831,740

 

Total

 

4,540,204

 

4,266,320

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

1,215,267

 

678,571

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

(1,551,875

)

(1,058,407

)

Derivative gains (losses)

 

309,283

 

(56,425

)

Gain on extinguishment of debt

 

 

15,758,011

 

Amortization of deferred income from sale of assets

 

50,613

 

50,613

 

Interest income

 

6,881

 

7,443

 

Total

 

(1,185,098

)

14,701,235

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME

 

$

30,169

 

$

15,379,806

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE —

 

 

 

 

 

BASIC

 

$

0.00

 

$

0.14

 

DILUTED

 

$

0.00

 

$

0.13

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

GASCO ENERGY, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

Gas

 

$

8,312,605

 

$

9,360,372

 

Oil

 

1,711,971

 

1,370,112

 

Gathering

 

 

595,942

 

Total

 

10,024,576

 

11,326,426

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

Lease operating

 

3,049,166

 

2,471,340

 

Gathering operations

 

 

375,848

 

Transportation and processing

 

1,703,099

 

1,124,208

 

Depletion, depreciation, amortization and accretion

 

1,835,568

 

1,946,828

 

Gain on sale of assets, net

 

 

(45,111

)

General and administrative

 

2,071,505

 

3,917,823

 

Total

 

8,659,338

 

9,790,936

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

1,365,238

 

1,535,490

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

(3,415,770

)

(2,409,569

)

Derivative gains

 

373,236

 

3,288,060

 

Gain on extinguishment of debt

 

 

15,758,011

 

Amortization of deferred income from sale of assets

 

101,226

 

67,484

 

Interest income

 

13,762

 

22,578

 

Total

 

(2,927,546

)

16,726,564

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET (LOSS) INCOME

 

$

(1,562,308

)

$

18,262,054

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET (LOSS) INCOME PER COMMON SHARE —

 

 

 

 

 

BASIC

 

$

(0.01

)

$

0.17

 

DILUTED

 

$

(0.01

)

$

0.16

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

GASCO ENERGY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(1,562,308

)

$

18,262,054

 

Adjustment to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depletion, depreciation, amortization, accretion and impairment expense

 

1,835,568

 

1,946,828

 

Stock-based compensation

 

176,178

 

874,844

 

Gain on extinguishment of debt

 

 

(15,758,011

)

Change in fair value of derivative instruments

 

36,384

 

(3,039,577

)

Amortization of debt discount, deferred expenses and other

 

1,491,531

 

161,157

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

(59,013

)

578,146

 

Inventory

 

(33,881

)

(150,210

)

Prepaid expenses

 

47,876

 

217,237

 

Accounts payable

 

(691,520

)

497,738

 

Revenue payable

 

1,298,342

 

148,407

 

Accrued interest

 

 

(788,723

)

Accrued expenses

 

(615,442

)

(183,106

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

1,923,715

 

2,766,784

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for furniture, fixtures and other

 

(892

)

(16,683

)

Cash paid for acquisitions, development and exploration

 

(3,817,400

)

(4,017,346

)

Proceeds from sale of assets

 

 

24,259,000

 

Increase (decrease) in advances from joint interest owners

 

(1,032,248

)

1,992,617

 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

(4,850,540

)

22,217,588

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants

 

6,000,000

 

 

Borrowings under line of credit

 

2,000,000

 

 

Repayment of borrowings

 

 

(29,000,000

)

Cash paid for stock offerings and debt issuance costs

 

(942,346

)

(1,952,025

)

Payment of deposit

 

 

(500,000

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

7,057,654

 

(31,452,025

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

4,130,829

 

(6,467,653

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:

 

 

 

 

 

BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

1,994,542

 

10,577,340

 

END OF PERIOD

 

$

6,125,371

 

$

4,109,687

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

7



Table of Contents

 

GASCO ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND 2010

 

NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION

 

Gasco Energy, Inc. (“Gasco,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”) is a natural gas and petroleum exploitation, development and production company engaged in locating and developing hydrocarbon resources, primarily in the Rocky Mountain region. The Company’s principal business strategy is to enhance stockholder value by generating and developing high-potential exploitation resources in these areas. The Company’s principal business is the acquisition of leasehold interests in petroleum and natural gas rights, either directly or indirectly, and the exploitation and development of properties subject to these leases. The Company is currently focusing its operational efforts in the Riverbend Project located in the Uinta Basin of northeastern Utah, targeting the Green River, Wasatch, Mesaverde, Blackhawk, Mancos, Dakota and Morrison formations.

 

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein were prepared from the records of the Company in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“US GAAP”) applicable to interim financial statements and reflect all normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to provide a fair statement of the results of operations and financial position for the interim periods.  Such financial statements conform to the presentation reflected in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (“2010 10-K”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The current interim period reported herein should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes, including Note 2 — Significant Accounting Policies, included in the Company’s 2010 10-K.

 

The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

 

NOTE 2 — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include Gasco and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

 

Oil and Gas Properties

 

The Company follows the full cost method of accounting whereby all costs related to the acquisition and development of oil and gas properties are capitalized into a single cost center (“full cost pool”). Such costs include lease acquisition costs, geological and geophysical expenses, internal costs directly related to exploration and development activities and costs of drilling both productive and non-productive wells. The Company capitalized $26,594 and $75,167 of internal costs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $29,053 during each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. Additionally, the Company capitalized stock compensation expense related to its drilling consultants as further described in Note 7 — Stock-Based Compensation herein. Costs associated with production and general corporate activities are expensed in the period incurred. During April 2010, the Company began charging a marketing fee related to the sale of its natural gas production to the wells in which it is the operator and, therefore, the net income attributable to the outside working interest owners from the marketing activities of $28,341 and $66,335 was

 

8



Table of Contents

 

recorded as a credit to proved properties during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $56,236 during each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. Proceeds from property sales are generally credited to the full cost pool without gain or loss recognition unless such a sale would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and the proved reserves attributable to a cost center.  A significant alteration would typically involve a sale of 25% or more of the proved reserves related to a single full cost pool.

 

Depletion of exploration and development costs and depreciation of production equipment is computed using the units-of-production method based upon estimated proved oil and gas reserves. Costs included in the depletion base to be amortized include: (a) all proved capitalized costs including capitalized asset retirement costs net of estimated salvage values, less accumulated depletion; (b) estimated future development costs to be incurred in developing proved reserves; and (c) estimated dismantlement and abandonment costs, net of estimated salvage values, that have not been included as capitalized costs because they have not yet been capitalized as asset retirement costs. The costs of unproved properties of $36,659,642 as of June 30, 2011 are withheld from the depletion base until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to the properties. The properties are reviewed quarterly for impairment.

 

Total well costs are transferred to the depletable pool even when multiple targeted zones have not been fully evaluated. For depletion and depreciation purposes, relative volumes of oil and gas production and reserves are converted at the energy equivalent rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of crude oil. Estimated reserve quantities are affected by changes in commodity prices and actual well performance.

 

Under the full cost method of accounting, the ceiling test provides that capitalized costs less related accumulated depletion and deferred income taxes for each cost center may not exceed the sum of (1) the present value of future net revenue from estimated production of proved oil and gas reserves using current prices, excluding the future cash outflows associated with settling asset retirement obligations that have been accrued on the balance sheet, at a discount factor of 10%; plus (2) the cost of properties not being amortized, if any; plus (3) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproved properties included in the costs being amortized, if any; less (4) income tax effects related to differences in the book and tax basis of oil and gas properties. Should the net capitalized costs for a cost center exceed the sum of the components noted above, a ceiling test write-down would be recognized to the extent of the excess capitalized costs exceed this ceiling limitation. The present value of estimated future net revenues is computed by applying the average, first-day-of—the-month oil and gas price during the 12-month period ended June 30, 2011 for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2011 to estimated future production of proved oil and gas reserves as of period-end, less estimated future expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves assuming the continuation of existing economic conditions.

 

Facilities and Equipment

 

The Company constructed two evaporation pits in the Riverbend area of Utah to be used for the disposal of produced water from the wells that Gasco operates in the area. The pits were depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful life of twenty-five years. The costs of water disposal into the evaporation pits were charged to wells operated by Gasco and therefore, the net income attributable to the outside working interest owners from the evaporation pits of $106,433 was recorded as an adjustment to proved properties during the six months ended June 30, 2010. These evaporative facilities were sold during February 2010. See Note 4 — Asset Sales herein.

 

The Company’s other oil and gas equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of five to ten years for the equipment and twenty-five years for the evaporative facilities, which were sold in February 2010. The rental of the equipment owned by the Company is charged to the wells that are

 

9



Table of Contents

 

operated by the Company and, therefore, the net income (expense) attributable to the outside working interest owners from the equipment rental was recorded as an adjustment to proved properties in the amount of $(15,310) and $(48,475) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively; and $22,200 and $(4,110) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. See Note 4 — Asset Sales herein.

 

Commodity Derivatives

 

The Company uses commodity derivative instruments to provide a measure of stability to its cash flows in an environment of volatile oil and gas prices and to manage its exposure to commodity price risk. The Company records all commodity derivative instruments at fair value within the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s management has decided not to use hedge accounting under the accounting guidance for its commodity derivatives and therefore, the changes in fair value are recognized currently in earnings.

 

Asset Retirement Obligation

 

The Company accounts for its future asset retirement obligations by recording the fair value of the liability during the period in which it was incurred. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The increase in carrying value of a property associated with the capitalization of an asset retirement cost is included in proved oil and gas properties, gathering system (sold in February 2010) or evaporative facilities costs (sold in February 2010) in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company depletes the amount added to proved oil and gas property costs and gathering system using the units-of-production method and the evaporative facilities were depreciated on a straight-line basis over the life of the assets. The Company’s asset retirement obligation consists of costs related to the plugging of wells, removal of facilities and equipment and site restoration on its oil and gas properties and gathering system. The asset retirement liability is allocated to operating expense using a systematic and rational method.

 

The information below reconciles the value of the asset retirement obligation for the periods presented.

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance beginning of period

 

$

1,145,092

 

$

1,080,514

 

$

1,119,561

 

$

1,260,965

 

Liabilities incurred

 

 

 

 

2,100

 

Property dispositions

 

 

(34,678

)

 

(242,981

)

Accretion expense

 

26,117

 

24,366

 

51,648

 

50,118

 

Balance end of period

 

$

1,171,209

 

$

1,070,202

 

$

1,171,209

 

$

1,070,202

 

 

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

From time-to-time, the Company enters into off-balance sheet arrangements and transactions that can give rise to off-balance sheet obligations. As of June 30, 2011, the off-balance sheet arrangements and transactions that the Company had entered into include undrawn letters of credit, operating lease agreements, gathering, compression, processing and water disposal agreements and gas transportation commitments. The Company does not believe that these arrangements are reasonably likely to materially affect its liquidity or availability of, or requirements for, capital resources.

 

10



Table of Contents

 

Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share

 

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to the common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. The shares of restricted common stock granted to certain officers and employees of the Company are included in the computation of basic net income (loss) per share only after the shares become fully vested. Diluted net income per share of common stock includes both the vested and unvested shares of restricted stock. Diluted net income or loss per common share of stock is computed by dividing adjusted net income by the diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding.  Potentially dilutive securities for the diluted earnings per share calculation consist of (i) unvested shares of restricted common stock, (ii) in-the-money outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock, (iii) outstanding Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Preferred Stock”), which are convertible into shares of common stock, (iv) the Company’s outstanding 5.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015 Notes (the “2015 Notes”), which are convertible into shares of Preferred Stock and common stock, and (v) the Company’s 5.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2011 (the “2011 Notes” and together with the 2015 Notes, the “Convertible Senior Notes”), which are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

The treasury stock method, which assumes that the increase in the number of shares is reduced by the number of shares which could have been repurchased by the Company with the proceeds from the exercise of the options (which were assumed to have been made at the average market price of the common shares during the reporting period), is used to measure the dilutive impact of stock options, shares of restricted common stock , warrants and shares into which the Convertible Senior Notes and Preferred Stock are convertible.

 

Net income (loss) per share information is determined using the two-class method, which includes the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period and other securities that participate in dividends (“participating security”). The Company considers the Preferred Stock to be a participating security because it includes rights to participate in dividends with the common stock. In applying the two-class method, earnings are allocated to both common stock shares and the Preferred Stock common stock equivalent shares based on their respective weighted-average shares outstanding for the period. Losses are not allocated to Preferred Stock shares. The table below sets forth the computations of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

For the Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2011

 

2010

 

Basic Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic net income (loss)

 

$

30,169

 

$

15,379,806

 

$

(1,562,308

)

$

18,262,054

 

Net earnings allocated to participating securities

 

5,977

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributed to common stockholders

 

$

24,192

 

$

15,379,806

 

$

(1,562,308

)

$

18,262,054

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding

 

128,845,127

 

107,607,262

 

128,030,779

 

107,608,993

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic net income (loss) per share

 

$

0.00

 

$

0.14

 

$

(0.01

)

$

0.17

 

 

11



Table of Contents

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

For the Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2011

 

2010

 

Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic net income (loss)

 

$

30,169

 

$

15,379,806

 

$

(1,562,308

)

$

18,262,054

 

Net earnings allocated to participating securities

 

5,977

 

 

 

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Add: interest on convertible senior notes

 

 

891,301

 

 

1,772,808

 

Diluted net income (loss) attributed to common stockholders

 

$

24,192

 

$

16,271,107

 

$

(1,562,308

)

$

20,034,862

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding

 

128,845,127

 

107,607,262

 

128,030,779

 

107,608,993

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unvested restricted stock

 

 

 

 

 

Options to purchase common stock

 

 

 

 

 

Shares issuable upon conversion of Convertible Senior Notes

 

 

16,599,341

 

 

16,425,636

 

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding

 

128,845,127

 

124,206,603

 

128,030,779

 

124,034,629

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted net income (loss) per share

 

$

0.00

 

$

0.13

 

$

(0.01

)

$

0.16

 

 

The following shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per common share as they did not have a dilutive effect.

 

 

 

For the Three Months
Ended June 30,

 

For the Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2011

 

2010

 

Shares related to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible notes

 

75,380,000

 

 

75,380,000

 

 

Preferred stock

 

 

 

31,833,340

 

 

Common stock options

 

10,579,293

 

11,789,857

 

10,579,293

 

11,727,349

 

Warrants

 

18,750,000

 

 

18,750,000

 

 

Unvested restricted stock

 

169,600

 

100,200

 

169,600

 

100,200

 

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of the financial statements for the Company in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

 

12



Table of Contents

 

The Company’s financial statements are based on a number of significant estimates, including oil and gas reserve quantities which are the basis for the calculation of depreciation, depletion and impairment of oil and gas properties, timing and costs associated with its retirement obligations, estimates of the fair value of derivative instruments, estimates used in stock-based compensation calculations and impairments to unproved property and to proved oil and gas properties.

 

Reclassifications

 

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years’ amounts to conform to the classifications used in the current year. Such reclassifications had no effect on the Company’s net income for the periods presented.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted ASC guidance that requires enhanced disclosure detail in the level 3 reconciliation for fair value measurements. The adoption had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Refer to Note 9 — Fair Value Measurement herein for further details regarding the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value.

 

NOTE 3 — STOCK OFFERINGS

 

On June 15, 2011, the Company closed its public offering of 25,000,000 units (the “June Offering”) at a price of $0.24 per unit, for gross proceeds of $6.0 million. Each unit consisted of (i) one share of common stock and (ii) one warrant to purchase 0.75 of a share of common stock (the “June Warrants”). The shares of common stock and June Warrants were issued separately. The net proceeds from the June Offering were $5,122,654 million, after deducting the underwriting discounts, commissions and other offering expenses of $877,346.

 

On August 3, 2011, the Company closed an underwritten registered offering of 16,000,000 units (the “August Offering” and collectively with the June Offering, the “Offerings”) at a price of $0.25 per unit, for gross proceeds of $4.0 million.  Each unit consisted of (i) one share of common stock and (ii) one warrant to purchase 0.71875 of a share of common stock (the “August Warrants” and collectively with the June Warrants, the “Warrants”).  The shares of common stock and August Warrants were issued separately. The net proceeds from the August Offering are expected to be approximately $3.6 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses.

 

The Warrants are exercisable for a term of sixty-months, beginning at issuance, at an initial exercise price of $0.35 per share, however, the exercise price and number of shares of common stock issuable on exercise of the Warrants are subject to adjustment in the event of any stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, reorganization or similar transaction.  If the Company makes a distribution of its assets to all of its stockholders, holders of the Warrants may be entitled to participate. In the event of a Fundamental Transaction (as defined in the Warrant), at the election of a holder of a Warrant, the Company may be required to purchase the holder’s Warrant for cash in an amount equal to the value of the remaining unexercised portion of the Warrant.  As a result, the Warrants are accounted for as a liability on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet with changes in their fair value reported in earnings. Subject to certain exceptions, if the average of the daily volume weighted average price of a share of common stock for some period of time equals or exceeds 200% of the initial exercise price of the Warrants, and if at the time of such measurement the Equity Conditions (as defined in the Warrant) are satisfied, then the Company may, subject to certain conditions, require the holders of the Warrants to exercise.

 

The Company intends to use the net proceeds from both of these Offerings for capital expenditures, working capital, acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties, repayment or refinancing of indebtedness or general corporate purposes.

 

13



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 4 — ASSET SALES

 

 

On February 26, 2010, the Company completed the sale (the “Closing”) of materially all of the assets (the “Asset Sale”) comprising its gathering system and its evaporative facilities, located in Uintah County, Utah, to Monarch Natural Gas, LLC (“Monarch”) pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated January 29, 2010 (the “Purchase Agreement”). The Purchase Agreement was subject to customary post-closing terms and conditions for transactions of this size and nature. At Closing, the Company received total cash consideration of $23 million from Monarch, the entirety of which was used to repay amounts outstanding under its Credit Facility.

 

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement and simultaneous with Closing, Gasco entered into the following contracts with Monarch: (i) a transition services agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to provide certain services relating to the operation of the acquired assets to Monarch for a six-month term commencing at Closing; (ii) a gas gathering agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to dedicate its natural gas production from all of its Utah acreage for a minimum fifteen-year period and Monarch agreed to provide gathering, compression and processing services to the Company utilizing the gathering system; and (iii) a salt water disposal services agreement pursuant to which Monarch agreed that the Company may deliver salt water produced by its operations to the evaporative facilities for a minimum fifteen-year period.

 

The Company recorded deferred income of approximately $3 million on the Asset Sale which will be amortized over the fifteen-year terms of the gas gathering agreement and salt water disposal services agreement.

 

The following unaudited pro forma information is presented as if the Asset Sale had an effective date of January 1, 2010.

 

 

 

Three Months
Ended June 30,

 

Six Months
Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue as reported

 

$

4,944,891

 

$

11,326,426

 

Less: revenue from the Asset Sale

 

 

595,942

 

Pro forma revenue

 

$

4,944,891

 

$

10,730,484

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income as reported

 

$

15,379,806

 

$

18,262,054

 

Less: operating loss resulting from the Assets Sale

 

 

(698,974

)

Pro forma net income

 

$

15,379,806

 

$

17,563,080

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share — basic as reported

 

$

0.14

 

$

0.17

 

Less net (loss) income per share - from the Asset Sale

 

0.00

 

0.00

 

Pro forma net income per share — basic

 

$

0.14

 

$

0.17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share — diluted as reported

 

$

0.13

 

$

0.16

 

Less net (loss) income per share - from the Asset Sale

 

0.00

 

0.00

 

Pro forma net income per share — diluted

 

$

0.13

 

$

0.16

 

 

14



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 5 - CONVERTIBLE SENIOR NOTES

 

As of June 30, 2011, the Company had $400,000 aggregate principal amount of 2011 Notes and $45,168,000 aggregate principal amount of 2015 Notes outstanding.

 

2011 Notes

 

The 2011 Notes are governed by an indenture, dated as of October 20, 2004, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (the “2011 Indenture”). The 2011 Notes were issued on October 20, 2004 and have a maturity date of October 5, 2011.

 

The 2011 Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.50% per annum, and such interest is payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on April 5th and October 5th of each year.

 

The 2011 Notes are convertible into shares of common stock at any time prior to maturity at a conversion rate of 250 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2011 Notes, which is subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments.

 

The Company, at its option, may at any time in whole, and from time to time in part, redeem the 2011 Notes on not less than 20 nor more than 60 days’ prior notice mailed to the holders of the 2011 Notes, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of 2011 Notes to be redeemed plus any accrued and unpaid interest to but not including the redemption date, if the closing price of the common stock has exceeded 130% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days in any consecutive 30 trading-day period.

 

Upon a “change of control” (as defined in the 2011 Indenture), each holder of 2011 Notes can require the Company to repurchase all of that holder’s notes 45 days after the Company gives notice of the change of control, at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of 2011 Notes to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the repurchase date, plus a make-whole premium under certain circumstances described in the 2011 Indenture.

 

2015 Notes

 

The 2015 Notes are governed by an indenture, dated as of June 25, 2010, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (the “2015 Indenture”). The 2015 Notes were issued on June 25, 2010 (the “Issue Date”) pursuant to the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, provided by Section 4(2) and Regulation D thereunder. The 2015 Notes have a maturity date of October 5, 2015.

 

The 2015 Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.50% per annum, and such interest is payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on April 5th and October 5th of each year.

 

The 2015 Notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time prior to maturity, into shares of common stock or, at the election of such holder, into Preferred Stock. The initial conversion price for converting the 2015 Notes into common stock is equal to $0.60 per share of common stock, which is equal to a conversion rate of 1,666.6667 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2015 Notes. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances and limitations. The initial conversion price for converting the 2015 Notes into Preferred Stock is equal to $100, which is equal to a conversion rate of ten shares of Preferred Stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2015 Notes. Pursuant to the 2015 Indenture, a holder may not convert all or any portion of such holder’s 2015 Notes into common stock to the extent that such

 

15



Table of Contents

 

holder and its affiliates would, after giving effect to such conversion, beneficially own more than 4.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock (the “Maximum Ownership Percentage”), provided that such holder, upon not less than 61 days’ prior written notice to the Company, may increase the Maximum Ownership Percentage applicable to such holder (but, for the avoidance of doubt, not for any subsequent or other holder) to 9.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock.

 

The Company may redeem the 2015 Notes in whole or in part for cash at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2015 Notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages, if any, on the 2015 Notes redeemed to but not including the redemption date, if the closing price of the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds 150% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days within the consecutive 30 trading day period ending on the trading day before the redemption date and all of the equity conditions set forth in the 2015 Indenture are satisfied (or waived in writing by the holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the 2015 Notes then outstanding). If a holder elects to convert its 2015 Notes in connection with such a provisional redemption by the Company, the Company will make an additional payment equal to the total value of the aggregate amount of the interest otherwise payable on the 2015 Notes to be calculated from the last day through which interest was paid on the 2015 Notes through and including the third anniversary of the Issue Date and discounted to the present value of such payment; provided, however, that at the Company’s option, in lieu of such discounted cash payment, the Company may deliver shares of Preferred Stock having a value equal to such discounted cash payment. The value of each share of Preferred Stock to be delivered shall be deemed equal to the product of (i) the average closing price per share of common stock over the ten trading day period ending on the trading day before the redemption date, and (ii) the number of whole shares of common stock into which each share of Preferred Stock is then convertible (without giving effect to any limitations on conversion in the Certificate of Designations of the Preferred Stock) (subject to certain conditions).

 

Upon a change of control (as defined in the 2015 Indenture), each holder of 2015 Notes may require the Company to repurchase some or all of its 2015 Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2015 Notes to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages, if any, to but not including the date of purchase, plus, in certain circumstances, a make whole premium. The Company may pay the change of control purchase price and/or the make whole premium in cash or shares of Preferred Stock at the Company’s option. In addition, in the case of the make whole premium, at the Company’s option, the Company may pay such premium in the same form of consideration used to pay for the shares of common stock in connection with the transaction constituting the change of control.

 

The 2015 Indenture contains usual and customary covenants limiting the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, with certain exceptions, or liens on its property or assets, restricting its ability to make dividends or other distributions, requiring its domestic subsidiaries to guaranty the 2015 Notes, requiring it to list the shares of common stock that may be issued upon conversion of the 2015 Notes and the Preferred Stock on the NYSE Amex or any other U.S. national or regional securities exchange on which the common stock is then listed, and requiring it to use reasonable best efforts to obtain stockholder approval for the issuance of shares of common stock upon conversion of the 2015 Notes and upon conversion of any shares of Preferred Stock issuable upon conversion of the 2015 Notes.

 

The 2015 Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated and rank on a parity in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness (including outstanding 2011 Notes), rank senior in right of payment to any of the Company’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness, and are effectively subordinated in right of payment to any of the Company’s secured indebtedness or other obligations to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness or other obligations. The Company’s subsidiaries guarantee the 2015 Notes pursuant to a Guaranty Agreement dated as of June 25, 2010, by and among Gasco Production Company, Riverbend Gas Gathering, LLC, and Myton Oilfield Rentals, LLC, in favor of the Trustee.

 

16



Table of Contents

 

The debt discount that was recognized in connection with the 2015 Notes is being accreted to interest expense under the effective interest method at a rate of 26.3%.

 

NOTE 6 — DERIVATIVES

 

The Company uses commodity derivative instruments to provide a measure of stability to its cash flows in an environment of volatile oil and gas prices and to manage its exposure to commodity price risk. As of June 30, 2011, natural gas derivative instruments consisted of one swap agreement for natural gas production through December 31, 2011 and one collar agreement for production from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2010, natural gas derivative instruments consisted of two swap agreements for the gas production through March 2011. These natural gas derivative instruments allow the Company to predict with greater certainty the effective natural gas prices to be realized for its production. The Company’s derivative contracts are described below:

 

·                  For its swap instrument, the Company receives a fixed price for the hedged commodity and pays a floating market price to the counterparty. The fixed-price payment and the floating-price payment are netted, resulting in a net amount due to or from the counterparty.

 

·                  The Company’s costless collar contains a fixed floor price (put) and ceiling price (call). If the market price exceeds the call strike price or falls below the put strike price, Gasco receives the fixed put or call price and pays the market price. If the market price is between the call and the put strike prices, no payments are due from either party.

 

On June 15, 2011, the Company issued the June Warrants to purchase 18,750,000 shares of common stock with an initial exercise price of $0.35 per share (subject to adjustment) and sixty-month term, as further described in Note 3 — Stock Offerings, herein. The Warrants contain a contingent cash settlement provision at the option of the holder and accordingly, are classified as a derivative liability and are subject to the classification and measurement standards for derivative financial instruments.

 

The following table details the fair value of the derivatives recorded in the consolidated balance sheets:

 

 

 

Location on Consolidated

 

Fair Value at

 

 

 

Balance Sheets

 

June 30, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas derivative contracts

 

Current assets

 

$

 

$

193,959

 

Natural gas derivative contracts

 

Noncurrent assets

 

19,643

 

 

Natural gas derivative contracts

 

Current liabilities

 

25,193

 

 

Warrant derivative

 

Noncurrent liabilities

 

1,687,500

 

 

 

The table below summarizes the realized and unrealized gains and losses related to the Company’s derivative instruments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

 

17



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Realized gains on commodity instruments

 

$

3,620

 

$

561,028

 

$

409,620

 

$

248,483

 

Change in fair value of commodity instruments

 

142,538

 

(617,453

)

(199,509

)

3,039,577

 

Change in fair value of warrant derivative

 

163,125

 

 

163,125

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) recorded

 

$

309,283

 

$

(56,425

)

$

373,236

 

$

3,288,060

 

 

These realized and unrealized gains and losses are recorded in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations as derivative gains and losses.

 

The Company’s swap agreement as of June 30, 2011 is summarized in the table below:

 

Agreement
Type

 

Remaining
Term

 

Quantity

 

Fixed Price
Counterparty
payer

 

Floating Price (a)
Gasco payer

 

Swap

 

7/11 — 12/11

 

2,000 MMBtu/day

 

$4.00/MMBtu

 

NW Rockies

 

 


(a)          Northwest Pipeline Rocky Mountains — Inside FERC first of month index price.

 

The Company’s costless collar agreement as of June 30, 2011 is summarized in the table below:

 

Agreement
Type

 

Remaining
Term

 

Quantity

 

Index
Price (a)

 

Call Price
Counterparty
buyer

 

Put Price
Gasco buyer

 

Costless collar

 

1/12 — 12/12

 

2,000 MMBtu/day

 

NW Rockies

 

$4.25/MMBtu

 

$5.12/MMBtu

 

 


(a)           Northwest Pipeline Rocky Mountains — Inside FERC first of month index price.

 

NOTE 7 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

 

The Company has outstanding common stock options and restricted stock issued under its equity incentive plans. The Company measures the fair value at the grant date for stock option grants and restricted stock awards and records compensation expense over the requisite service period. The expense recognized over the service period includes an estimate of the awards that will be forfeited.  The Company assumes no forfeitures for employee awards based on the Company’s historical forfeiture experience. The fair value of stock options is calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of restricted stock is based on the fair value of the stock on the date of grant.

 

The Company accounts for stock compensation arrangements with non-employees using a fair value approach. Under this approach, the stock compensation related to the unvested stock options issued to non-employees is recalculated at the end of each reporting period based upon the fair value on that date. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized stock-based compensation as follows:

 

18



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee compensation

 

$

7,866

 

$

332,272

 

$

176,898

 

$

878,401

 

Consultant compensation (reduction in compensation)

 

(3,176

)

1,056

 

(1,440

)

(4,927

)

Total stock-based compensation

 

4,690

 

333,328

 

175,458

 

873,474

 

Less: consultant compensation expense (reduction in expense) capitalized as proved property

 

(1,588

)

(490

)

(720

)

1,370

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

$

6,278

 

$

332,838

 

$

176,178

 

$

874,844

 

 

Stock Options

 

The following table summarizes the stock option activity in the equity incentive plans from January 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011:

 

 

 

Shares Underlying
Stock Options

 

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2011

 

12,689,733

 

$

1.63

 

Granted

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

(70,280

)

$

1.35

 

Cancelled

 

(2,040,160

)

$

1.43

 

Outstanding at June 30, 2011

 

10,579,293

 

$

1.67

 

Exercisable at June 30, 2011

 

9,362,550

 

$

1.81

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company granted 1,371,000 options to purchase 50,000, 175,000, 646,000 and 500,000 shares of common stock with exercise prices of $0.34, $0.35, $0.36 and $0.37 per share, respectively. These options have a one- or two-year vesting period and expire within five years of the grant date. These options were granted contingent on stockholder approval of a new stock option plan, which was approved at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders during July 2011. Therefore these options were accounted for as liability awards until stockholder approval was obtained. A share-based compensation liability of $68,019 is included in current accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2011.

 

The following table summarizes information related to the outstanding and vested options as of June 30, 2011:

 

 

 

Outstanding Options

 

Vested Options

 

Number of shares

 

10,579,293

 

9,362,550

 

Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life

 

2.99 years

 

2.82 years

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

 

$

1.67

 

$

1.81

 

Aggregate intrinsic value

 

 

 

 

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pretax intrinsic value, which is the amount by which the fair value of the Company’s stock at June 30, 2011 of $0.22 exceeds the exercise price of certain

 

19



Table of Contents

 

outstanding options.

 

The Company settles employee stock option exercises with newly issued common shares.

 

As of June 30, 2011, there is $237,759 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested options granted under the Company’s equity incentive plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a period of 1.5 years.

 

Restricted Stock

 

The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity from January 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011:

 

 

 

Restricted
Stock

 

Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2011

 

191,300

 

$

0.70

 

Granted

 

 

 

Vested

 

(12,800

)

$

2.87

 

Forfeited

 

(8,900

)

$

1.75

 

Outstanding at June 30, 2011

 

169,600

 

$

0.49

 

 

As of June 30, 2011, there is $73,825 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock granted under the Company’s stock plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a period of 2.5 years.

 

NOTE 8 — CREDIT FACILITY

 

The Company’s $250 million revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”) is available to provide funds for the exploration, development and/or acquisition of oil and gas properties, to refinance existing indebtedness and for working capital and other general corporate purposes. In May 2011, the Company completed its semi-annual re-determination of its borrowing base under the Credit Facility, and as a result, effective May 9, 2011, the borrowing base was decreased from $16 million to $15 million. As of June 30, 2011, there were loans in the amount of $8,544,969 and letters of credit in the amount of $25,195 outstanding under the Credit Facility. As of August 9, 2011, the unused borrowing base is approximately $6.4 million.

 

Borrowings made under the Credit Facility are secured by a pledge of the capital stock of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries and mortgages on substantially all of the Company’s oil and gas properties. Interest on borrowings is payable monthly and principal is due at maturity on March 26, 2012.

 

Interest on borrowings under the Credit Facility accrues at variable interest rates at either a Eurodollar rate or an alternate base rate (“ABR”). The Eurodollar rate is calculated as LIBOR plus an applicable margin that, as amended, varies from 2.75% (for periods in which the Company has utilized less than 50% of the borrowing base) to 3.75% (for periods in which the Company has utilized at least 90% of the borrowing base). The ABR, as amended, is equal to the sum of (i) the greater of (a) the Prime Rate, (b) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.50% and (c) the Adjusted LIBOR for a one month interest period on such day plus 1.00% and (ii) an applicable margin that varies from 1.75% (for periods in which the Company has utilized less than 50% of the borrowing base) to 2.75% (for periods in which the Company has utilized at least 90% of the borrowing base). The Company elects the basis of the interest rate at the time of each borrowing under the Credit Facility. However, under certain circumstances, the Lenders may require the Company to use the non-elected basis in

 

20



Table of Contents

 

the event that the elected basis does not adequately and fairly reflect the cost of making such loans. The interest rate on our Credit Facility is 5.1% as of June 30, 2011.

 

The Credit Facility requires the Company to comply with financial covenants that require it to maintain (1) a current ratio (defined as current assets plus unused availability under the Credit Facility divided by current liabilities excluding the current portion of the Credit Facility), determined at the end of each quarter, of not less than 1.0:1.0; and (2) a ratio of Senior Debt to EBITDAX (as such terms are defined in the Credit Facility) for the most recent four quarters not to be greater than 3.5:1.0 for each fiscal quarter.  In addition, the Credit Facility contains covenants that restrict the Company’s ability to incur other indebtedness, create liens or sell the Company’s assets, pay dividends on the Company’s common stock and make certain investments. Sustained or lower oil and natural gas prices could reduce the Company’s consolidated EBITDAX and thus could reduce the Company’s ability to maintain existing levels of bank debt or incur additional indebtedness. Any failure to be in compliance with any material provision or covenant of the Credit Facility could result in a default which would, absent a waiver or amendment, require immediate repayment of outstanding indebtedness under the Credit Facility.  Additionally, should the Company’s obligation to repay indebtedness under the Credit Facility be accelerated, the Company would be in default under the indentures governing the Convertible Senior Notes, which would require repayment of the outstanding principal, interest and liquidated damages, if any, on such Convertible Senior Notes.  To the extent it becomes necessary to address any anticipated covenant compliance issues, the Company will seek to obtain a waiver or amendment of the Credit Facility from the Lenders, and in the event that such waiver or amendment is not granted, the Company may be required to sell a portion of its assets or issue additional securities, which would be dilutive to the Company’s stockholders.  Any sale of assets or issuance of additional securities may not be on terms acceptable to the Company.

 

As of June 30 2011, the Company’s current and senior debt to EBITDAX ratios are 3.0:1.0 and 1.4:1.0, respectively, and the Company is in compliance with each of the covenants contained in the Credit Facility.

 

NOTE 9 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

The authoritative guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:

 

Level 1: Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

 

Level 2: Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities that are observable for the asset or liability; or

 

Level 3: Unobservable pricing inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources, such as discounted cash flows models or valuations.

 

The financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers in and/or out of fair value hierarchy as of the end of the reporting period for which the event or change in circumstances

 

21



Table of Contents

 

caused the transfer. The Company has consistently applied the valuation techniques discussed below in all periods presented.

 

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 by level within the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

June 30, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

$

 

$

19,643

 

$

 

$

19,643

 

Commodity derivatives

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity derivatives

 

$

 

$

25,193

 

$

 

$

25,193

 

Warrant derivatives

 

$

 

$

 

$

1,687,500

 

$

1,687,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity derivatives

 

$

 

$

193,959

 

$

 

$

193,959

 

 

As of June 30, 2011, the Company’s commodity derivative financial instruments are comprised of one natural gas swap agreement and one costless collar agreement. The fair values of the swap and collar agreements are determined based primarily on inputs that are derived from observable data at commonly quoted intervals for the full term of the derivatives and are, therefore, considered level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The Company determines the fair value of these contracts under the income valuation technique using a discounted cash flows model for the swap and option pricing model for the collar. The valuation models require a variety of inputs, including contractual terms, projected gas market prices, discount rate and credit risk adjustments, as appropriate. The Company has consistently applied this valuation technique in all periods presented and believes it has obtained the most accurate information available for the types of derivative contracts it holds. The counterparty in all of the Company’s commodity derivative financial instruments is the Administrative Agent under the Credit Agreement. See Note 8 — Credit Facility herein.

 

As of June 30, 2011, the Company’s warrant derivative financial instrument is comprised of the June Warrants issued by the Company to purchase 18,750,000 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $0.35 per share (subject to adjustment) within sixty-months from issuance, as further described in Note 3 — Stock Offerings, herein. The Warrants contain a contingent cash settlement provision at the option of the holder and accordingly are classified as a derivative liability and are subject to the classification and measurement standards for derivative financial instruments. The Warrants are valued using a binomial-lattice-based valuation model. The lattice-based valuation technique is utilized because it embodies all of the requisite assumptions (including the underlying price, exercise price, term, volatility, and risk-free interest-rate) that are necessary to fair value these instruments. Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of the Company’s common stock, which has a high-historical volatility.

 

22



Table of Contents

 

A summary of the June Warrants issued by the Company is as follows:

 

 

 

Number of
Warrants

 

Exercise
Price

 

Remaining
Contractual Life

 

Warrants outstanding as of 12/31/10

 

 

 

 

Warrants issued

 

18,750,000

 

$

0.35

 

60 months

 

Warrants outstanding as of 6/30/11

 

18,750,000

 

$

0.35

 

59.5 months

 

 

The significant assumptions used in the valuation of the warrant derivative liability are as follows:

 

Exercise price

 

$0.35 per share

Volatility

 

60%

Term of Warrants

 

60 months

Risk-free interest rate

 

0.24%

 

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of financial liabilities classified as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

 

Warrant
Derivative

 

Balance as of January 1, 2011

 

$

 

Total gains (realized or unrealized):

 

 

 

Included in earnings

 

163,125

 

Included in other comprehensive income

 

 

Issuances

 

(1,850,625

)

Settlements

 

 

Transfers in and out of level 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of June 30, 2011

 

$

(1,687,500

)

 

 

 

 

Change in unrealized gains included in earnings relating to instruments still held as of June 30, 2011

 

$

163,125

 

 

Other financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring basis include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, note receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, 2011 Notes, 2015 Notes and long-term debt. With the exception of the note receivable and 2015 Notes, the financial statement carrying amounts of these items approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. The carrying amount of the Company’s note receivable approximates fair value based on current interest rates for similar instruments. The estimated fair value of the 2015 Notes of $27,380,408 and $31,766,000 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, was determined using a discounted cash flow and option pricing model.

 

NOTE 10 - STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company’s non-cash investing and financing activities consisted of the following transactions:

 

·                  Stock-based compensation reduction in expense of $720 capitalized as proved property.

 

23



Table of Contents

 

·      Conversion of 34,600 shares of Preferred Stock into 5,766,667 shares of common stock.

 

·                  Additions to oil and gas properties included in accounts payable of $654,011.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company’s non-cash investing and financing activities consisted of the following transactions:

 

·                  Recognition of an asset retirement obligation for the plugging and abandonment costs related to the Company’s oil and gas properties valued at $2,100.

 

·                  Reduction in stock-based compensation expense of $1,370 capitalized as proved property.

 

·                  Additions to oil and gas properties included in accounts payable of $58,192.

 

·                  Recognition of deferred income of $3,036,794 in connection with Asset Sale described in Note 4 —Asset Sales herein.

 

Cash paid for interest during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $1,823,015 and $2,903,729, respectively. There was no cash paid for income taxes during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

 

NOTE 11 — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

The Company is party to various litigation matters arising out of the normal course of business.  The more significant litigation matter is summarized below.  The ultimate outcome of this matter cannot presently be determined, nor can the liability that could potentially result from an adverse outcome be reasonably estimated at this time.  The Company does not expect that the outcome of this proceeding will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

EPA Enforcement Action

 

On June 22, 2007, Riverbend Gas Gathering, LLC (“Riverbend”) voluntarily notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) Region 8 office in Denver, Colorado, of its discovery that Riverbend apparently had not obtained certain air permits or complied with certain air pollution regulatory programs applicable to its operations at the Riverbend Compressor Station in Uintah County, Utah.  Subsequent to this notice and negotiations on the matter, Riverbend and the EPA entered into a consent decree that was lodged in the United States District Court of the District of Utah on December 30, 2010.  The consent decree resolves the apparent violations, requires Gasco to pay a civil penalty of $350,000, which was paid on May 5, 2011, specifies the appropriate corrective action, provides a schedule for Riverbend to achieve such corrective action, and includes a covenant not to sue that will authorize Riverbend to continue its operations, including certain capacity expansions, while the specified corrective action is being implemented.  The consent decree was approved and entered by the reviewing court on April 6, 2011.

 

Under the Purchase Agreement dated January 29, 2010 by which the Company sold its gathering system and its evaporative facilities located in Uintah County, Utah to Monarch, the Company retained the obligation to pay any civil penalty assessed and the capital cost of the equipment required to be installed pursuant to the consent decree, and also agreed to reimburse Monarch for certain miscellaneous expenses incurred to finalize the consent decree and obtain certain changes to the Riverbend Compressor Station’s air permits that are required by the consent decree.  Monarch is also a party to the consent decree and will be responsible for implementing most of the consent decree requirements at the Riverbend Compressor Station other than payment of the civil penalty, which has already taken place, and the installation of capital equipment.  The

 

24



Table of Contents

 

Company believes that all necessary pollution control and other equipment required by the consent decree is already installed at the site or accounted for in our capital budget, and that the expenses required by the consent decree will not materially affect the Company’s financial position or liquidity.

 

NOTE 12 — GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES

 

On August 22, 2008, Gasco filed a Form S-3 shelf registration statement with the SEC. Under this registration statement, which was declared effective on September 8, 2008, Gasco may from time to time offer and sell securities including common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares, warrants and debt securities that may be fully, irrevocably and unconditionally guaranteed by all of its subsidiaries:  Gasco Production Company, Riverbend Gas Gathering, LLC and Myton Oilfield Rentals, LLC (collectively, the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”). The stand-alone parent entity, Gasco Energy, Inc., has insignificant independent assets and no operations. Therefore, supplemental financial information on a condensed consolidating basis of the Guarantor Subsidiaries is not required. There are no restrictions on the Company’s ability to obtain cash dividends or other distributions of funds from the guarantor subsidiaries, except those imposed by applicable law.

 

25



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Overview

 

We are a natural gas and petroleum exploitation, development and production company engaged in locating and developing hydrocarbon resources, primarily in the Rocky Mountain region. Our principal business strategy is to enhance stockholder value by using technologies new to a specific area to generate and develop high-potential exploitation resources in these areas. Our principal business is the acquisition of leasehold interests in petroleum and natural gas rights, either directly or indirectly, and the exploitation and development of properties subject to these leases. We are currently focusing our operational efforts in the Riverbend Project located in the Uinta Basin of northeastern Utah, targeting the Green River, Wasatch, Mesaverde, Blackhawk, Mancos, Dakota and Morrison formations.

 

Recent Developments

 

Stock Offerings

 

On June 15, 2011, we closed our public offering of 25,000,000 units (the “June Offering”) at a price of $0.24 per unit, for gross proceeds of $6.0 million. Each unit consisted of (i) one share of common stock and (ii) one warrant to purchase 0.75 of a share of common stock (the “June Warrants”). The shares of common stock and June Warrants were issued separately. The net proceeds from the June Offering were approximately $5.1 million, after deducting the underwriting discounts, commissions and other offering expenses of approximately $877,000.

 

On August 3, 2011, we closed an underwritten registered offering of 16,000,000 units (the “August Offering” and collectively with the June Offering, the “Offerings”) at a price of $0.25 per unit, for gross proceeds of $4.0 million.  Each unit consisted of (i) one share of common stock and (ii) one warrant to purchase 0.71875 of a share of common stock (the “August Warrants” and collectively with the June Warrants, the “Warrants”).  The shares of common stock and August Warrants were issued separately. The net proceeds from the August Offering are expected to be approximately $3.6 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses.

 

The Warrants are exercisable immediately for a term of sixty-months, beginning at issuance, at an initial exercise price of $0.35 per share, however, the exercise price and number of shares of common stock issuable on exercise of the Warrants are be subject to adjustment in the event of any stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, reorganization or similar transaction.  If we make a distribution of our assets to all of our stockholders, holders of the Warrants may be entitled to participate. In the event of a Fundamental Transaction (as defined in the Warrant), at the election of a holder of a Warrant, we may be required to purchase the holder’s Warrant for cash in an amount equal to the value of the remaining unexercised portion of the Warrant.  Subject to certain exceptions, if the average of the daily volume weighted average price of a share of Common Stock for some period of time equals or exceeds 200% of the initial exercise price of the Warrants, and if at the time of such measurement the Equity Conditions (as defined in the Warrant) are satisfied, then we may, subject to certain conditions, require the holders of the Warrants to exercise.

 

We intend to use the net proceeds from the both of these Offerings for capital expenditures, working capital, acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties, repayment or refinancing of indebtedness or general corporate purposes.

 

26



Table of Contents

 

Completion Operations

 

During the first six months of 2011, we recompleted one (0.3333 net) natural gas well in the Uinta Basin, Utah. We are in the process of finalizing the federal drilling permits for two of our wells which will test the productive potential of the Green River Formation, a shallow, oil-bearing reservoir system that we believe is prospective across approximately 11,000 net acres of our Uinta Basin leasehold. We are satisfying all of the well permitting requirements that are necessary to drill on federal lands. We continue to expect to spud both wells during the third quarter of 2011 and anticipate that completions for both wells will follow shortly after both wells have been drilled. We have elected to defer our uphole natural gas well recompletion program until the latter part of the third quarter and into the fourth quarter in anticipation of stronger seasonal natural gas prices.

 

As of June 30, 2011, we operated 133 gross wells and we currently have an inventory of 18 operated wells with up-hole recompletions and on Upper Mancos well awaiting initial completion activities.

 

We do not have a drilling rig under contract at this time, as was the case for all of 2010. We are in the process of contracting a drilling rig for use in the upcoming two-well Green River oil well program.

 

California Projects

 

Northwest McKittrick. The operator of this shallow oil prospect continues to work with the California State Agencies to acquire the appropriate permits.  Progress has been slowed due to California state budget issues and forced furloughs affecting the regulatory agencies.  Despite the delays, the operator has indicated that it anticipates that it will commence drilling operations during the third quarter of 2011.

 

Willow Springs. The operator of this oil prospect has been analyzing recently acquired 3-D seismic data and is currently high-grading drillable locations based upon the ongoing 3-D interpretation. Well permitting has begun and our understanding is that the project is on schedule to have an initial well drilled by year-end 2011.

 

Antelope Valley Trend. The operator of these oil and liquids-rich prospects is in the process of shooting 3-D seismic over the Antelope Valley prospects.  Drilling on the trend is anticipated to begin in 2012.

 

San Joaquin Basin. We continue to develop new prospects and acquire acreage along the west side of the San Joaquin Basin.  The new prospects are a continuation of the structural and stratigraphic geologic model that we have been working for the past nine years that has yielded recent success along the west side as demonstrated by discoveries and field development by other operators with similar geologic models.

 

Oil and Gas Production Summary

 

The following table presents our production and price information during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The Mcfe calculations assume a conversion of six Mcf for each Bbl of oil.

 

27



Table of Contents

 

 

 

For the Three Months
Ended June 30,

 

For the Six Months
Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas production (Mcf)

 

1,030,767

 

1,084,910

 

1,943,842

 

2,023,617

 

Average sales price per Mcf

 

$

4.47

 

$

3.90

 

$

4.28

 

$

4.62

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil production (Bbl)

 

12,904

 

11,127

 

20,478

 

21,359

 

Average sales price per Bbl

 

$

88.80

 

$

63.85

 

$

83.60

 

$

64.15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Production (Mcfe)

 

1,108,191

 

1,151,672

 

2,066,710

 

2,151,771

 

 

Our equivalent oil and gas production decreased by 4% during each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three and months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, primarily due to normal production declines on our existing wells which were partially offset by the new production from our recompletion projects during 2010 and the first six months of 2011.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our primary sources of liquidity and capital resources are internally generated cash flows from operating activities or asset sales, availability under our Credit Facility, and access to capital markets, to the extent available. During May 2011, we completed the semi-annual re-determination of our borrowing base under Credit Facility and as a result, our borrowing base was decreased to $15 million from the previously available $16 million. As of August 9, 2011, we have approximately $8.6 million aggregate amount of outstanding borrowings (including $25,195 of outstanding letters of credit) thereunder. Our Credit Facility provides for periodic and special borrowing base redeterminations which could affect our available borrowing base and our lenders may further reduce our borrowing base in the future. Our inability to access additional borrowings in excess of our $6.4 million of current existing capacity under our Credit Facility may limit our ability to increase our operating budget and execute on our growth plans.

 

During June 2011, we raised approximately $5.2 million in net proceeds through the June Offering of 25,000,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 18,750,000 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $0.35 per share, subject to adjustment. The shares of common stock and June Warrants were sold in units, consisting of (i) one share of common stock and (ii) one warrant to purchase 0.75 of a share of common stock.

 

On August 3, 2011, we closed the underwritten registered August Offering of 16,000,000 units at a price of $0.25 per unit, for gross proceeds of $4.0 million.  Each unit consisted of (i) one share of common stock and (ii) one warrant to purchase 0.71875 of a share of common stock. The net proceeds from the August Offering are expected to be approximately $3.6 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses.

 

The Warrants are exercisable immediately upon issuance, having a sixty-month term and an initial exercise price of $0.35 per share, subject to adjustment.

 

We intend to use the net proceeds from the both of these Offerings for capital expenditures, working capital, acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties, repayment or refinancing of indebtedness or general corporate purposes.

 

28



Table of Contents

 

We continually evaluate our capital needs and compare them to our capital resources and ability to raise funds in the financial markets. We adjust capital expenditures in response to changes in natural gas and oil prices, drilling results and cash flow. If we need additional liquidity for future activities, including paying amounts owed in connection with a borrowing base reduction, if any, we may be required to consider several options for raising additional funds, such as selling securities, selling assets or farm-outs or similar arrangements, but we may be unable to complete any of these transactions on terms acceptable to us or at all.  Any financing obtained through the sale of our equity will likely result in substantial dilution to our stockholders.

 

As of June 30, 2011, we had negative working capital of approximately $3.2 million primarily due to the approximately $8.5 million aggregate amount of borrowings outstanding under our Credit Facility at such time, which is now a current liability due March 26, 2012, and $400,000 related to the 2011 Notes. The 2011 Notes will be settled in October 2011 and we are currently working with our lenders to extend the maturity date of our Credit Facility as well as discussing alternative borrowing arrangements with other lenders. Any extension or refinancing of our Credit Facility may be on terms less favorable to us or may not be available at all.

 

Sources and Uses of Funds

 

The following table summarizes our sources and uses of cash for each of the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

 

 

 

For the Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operations

 

$

1,923,715

 

$

2,766,784

 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

(4,850,540

)

22,217,588

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

7,057,654

 

(31,452,025

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash

 

4,130,829

 

(6,467,653

)

 

Cash provided by operations decreased by $843,069 from June 30, 2010 to June 30, 2011.  The decrease in cash provided by operations was primarily due to the 4% decrease in equivalent production partially offset by a 30% increase in the oil prices received during the first six months of 2011.

 

Our investing activities during the first six months of 2011 included our development and exploration activities, fixed asset additions and the change in advances from joint interest owners. The investing activity during the first six months of 2010 was comprised of the sales proceeds of $24,259,000 associated primarily with the sale of our gathering and evaporative facilities (see Note 4 — Asset Sales of the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements), the sale of a partial working interest in 32 producing wells and the development and exploration activities, fixed asset additions and the change in advances from joint interest owners.

 

The financing activity during the first six months of 2011 included $6.0 million in gross proceeds from the sale of common stock and June Warrants, $2.0 million in borrowings under our Credit Facility and the payment of $942,346 in costs associated with the June Offering and the issuance of our 2015 Notes. The financing activity during the first six months of 2010 was comprised of $29.0 million in repayments of borrowings on our Credit Facility, the payment of $1,952,025 in costs associated with the issuance of our 2015 Notes and the payment of a deposit of $500,000 in connection with our new gathering agreement in February 2010.

 

29



Table of Contents

 

Capital Budget

 

Our Board of Directors approved an initial capital expenditure budget of $6.0 million for our 2011 oil and gas activities. In the Uinta Basin, we allocated approximately $2.4 million for our continued up-hole recompletion program targeting natural gas and an additional $1.6 million for the drilling and completion of two Green River Formation oil wells. A significant portion of the remaining $2.0 million budget may be allocated to additional investments in existing and new California oil and gas prospects in the San Joaquin Basin. As of June 30, 2011, we had expended approximately $3.1 of the $6.0 million capital expenditure budget.  We expect that the remaining portion of our budget will be funded primarily from cash on hand, cash flow from operations, cash from the Offerings and borrowings under our Credit Facility, however, our budget is subject to market conditions, drilling results, oilfield service availability and commodity prices.

 

Risk Management

 

We use commodity derivative instruments to provide a measure of stability to our cash flows in an environment of volatile oil and gas prices and to manage our exposure to commodity price risk.  However, these derivative instruments may limit the prices we actually realize and therefore may reduce oil and natural gas revenues in the future. The fair value of our oil and natural gas derivative instruments (excluding the Warrants) outstanding as of June 30, 2011 was a current liability of $25,193 and a non-current asset of $19,643. See Part I, Item 3 “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” for further discussion on our risk management policies.

 

Results of Operations

 

The Second Quarter of 2011 Compared to the Second Quarter of 2010

 

Oil and Gas Revenue and Production

 

The table below sets forth the production volumes, price and revenue by product for the periods presented.

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas production (Mcf)

 

1,030,767

 

1,084,910

 

Average sales price per Mcf

 

$

4.47

 

$

3.90

 

Natural gas revenue

 

$

4,609,574

 

$

4,234,472

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil production (Bbl)

 

12,904

 

11,127

 

Average sales price per Bbl

 

$

88.80

 

$

63.85

 

Oil revenue

 

$

1,145,897

 

$

710,419

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equivalent production (Mcfe)

 

1,108,191

 

1,151,672

 

 

The increase in oil and gas revenue of $810,580 during the second quarter of 2011 compared with the second quarter of 2010 was comprised of an increase in the oil and gas prices of $24.95 per Bbl of oil and $0.57 per Mcf of gas, partially offset by a 4% decrease in equivalent production. The decrease in equivalent oil and gas production was primarily due to normal production declines on our existing wells partially offset by the new production from recompletion projects during 2010 and the first six months of 2011. The $810,580 increase in

 

30



Table of Contents

 

oil and gas revenue during the second quarter of 2011 represents an increase of $907,543 related to the increase in oil and gas prices and a decrease of $96,963 related to the equivalent production decrease.

 

Gathering Revenue and Expenses

 

Gathering revenue and expense during 2010 represented the income earned from the third-party working interest owners in the wells we operated (our share of gathering revenue was eliminated against the transportation expense included in our lease operating costs) and the expenses incurred from our gathering system in the Riverbend area that we constructed during 2004 and 2005. We sold our gathering system in February 2010, as described in Note 4 — Asset Sales of the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which eliminated these revenue and expenses after February 2010.

 

Lease Operating Expenses

 

The table below sets forth the detail of oil and gas lease operating expense during the periods presented.

 

 

 

For the Three
Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Direct operating expenses and overhead

 

$

1,203,274

 

$

1,242,412

 

Workover expense

 

295,766

 

112,025

 

Total operating expenses

 

$

1,499,040

 

$

1,354,437

 

Operating expenses per Mcfe

 

$

1.35

 

$

1.18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Production and property taxes

 

$

208,694

 

$

174,715

 

Production and property taxes per Mcfe

 

$

0.19

 

$

0.15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total lease operating expense per Mcfe

 

$

1.54

 

$

1.33

 

 

Lease operating expense increased $178,582 during the second quarter of 2011 compared with the second quarter of 2010. The increase is comprised of a $144,603 increase in operating expenses and a $33,979 increase in production taxes primarily due to the increase in oil and gas revenue primarily due to increased commodity prices during the second quarter of 2011.  The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to a $183,741 increase in workover expenses attributable to the increased number of workover projects during the second quarter of 2011.

 

Transportation and Processing

 

Transportation and processing costs of $901,384 ($0.81 per Mcfe) and $884,953 ($0.80 per Mcfe) as of June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, represent the costs we incurred to transport the gas production from our wells subsequent to the sale of our gathering system as described in Note 4 — Asset Sales in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The increase of $16,431 in these expenses during the second quarter of 2011 reflects the increase in oil and gas revenue during the second quarter of 2011, as previously described.

 

31



Table of Contents

 

Depletion, Depreciation, Amortization and Accretion

 

Depletion, depreciation and amortization expense during the second quarters of 2011 and 2010 is comprised of depletion expense related to our oil and gas properties, depreciation expense of furniture, fixtures and equipment and accretion expense related to the asset retirement obligation. The decrease of $84,555 during the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010 was primarily due to the decrease in the depletion rate resulting from the production decrease as described above.

 

Gain on sale of assets, net

 

The gain on sale of assets, net during the second quarter of 2010 is comprised of a net gain of $49,754 reflecting the value of the inventory attributable to the outside working interest owners when it was transferred to the wells.

 

General and Administrative Expense

 

The following table summarizes the components of general and administrative expense and stock-based compensation expense incurred during the periods presented.

 

 

 

For the Three
Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total general and administrative costs

 

$

1,370,597

 

$

1,094,472

 

General and administrative costs allocated to drilling, completion and operating activities

 

(431,533

)

(595,570

)

General and administrative expense

 

$

939,064

 

$

498,902

 

General and administrative expenses per Mcfe

 

$

0.85

 

$

0.43

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total stock-based compensation costs

 

$

4,690

 

$

333,328

 

Stock-based compensation (costs) reduction in costs capitalized

 

1,588

 

(490

)

Stock-based compensation

 

$

6,278

 

$

332,838

 

Stock-based compensation per Mcfe

 

$

0.00

 

$

0.29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total general and administrative expense including stock-based compensation

 

$

945,342

 

$

831,740

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total general and administrative expense per Mcfe

 

$

0.85

 

$

0.72

 

 

General and administrative expense increased by $113,602 ($0.13 per Mcfe) during the second quarter of 2011 as compared with the second quarter of 2010 due to an increase in general and administrative expenses of $440,162 partially offset by a $326,560 decrease in stock-based compensation. General and administrative expenses were higher during the second quarter of 2011 when compared with the expenses in the same period during 2010 primarily because the balance for the second quarter of 2010 included a $400,000 legal fee reimbursement received from our insurance company. The decrease in stock-based compensation expense is due to a substantial portion of our unvested stock options that were granted contingent on stockholder approval of a new stock option plan and therefore were being accounted for as liability awards until approval was received in July 2011. The decrease in the compensation expense associated with these unvested stock options

 

32



Table of Contents

 

is primarily due to the decrease in the trading price of our common stock during the second quarter of 2011 as compared to the second quarter of 2010.

 

Interest Expense

 

Interest expense increased $493,468 during the second quarter of 2011 as compared with the second quarter of 2010, primarily due to the additional interest expense attributable to the amortization of the discount and the offering costs related to our 2015 Notes.

 

Derivative Gains (Losses)

 

Derivative gains (losses) during the second quarters of June 30, 2011 and 2010 are comprised of realized and unrealized gains and losses on our commodity derivative instruments and unrealized gains on our warrant derivative liability during the second quarter of 2011. The unrealized derivative gains (losses) represent the changes in the fair value of our derivative assets and liabilities and the realized derivative gains (losses) represent the net settlements due from or to our counterparty based on each month’s settlement during the quarter.

 

Amortization of Deferred Income from Sale of Assets

 

The amortization of the deferred income from the sale of assets represents the amortization of the excess of proceeds received over the carrying value of our gathering system and evaporative facilities as further described in Note 4 — Asset Sales of the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

The First Six Months of 2011 Compared to the First Six Months of 2010

 

The comparisons for the six months ended June 30, 2011 with the six months ended June 30, 2010 are consistent with the comparisons discussed for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 except as discussed below:

 

Oil and Gas Revenue and Production

 

The table below sets forth the production volumes, price and revenue by product for the periods presented.

 

 

 

For the Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas production (Mcf)

 

1,943,842

 

2,023,617

 

Average sales price per Mcf

 

$

4.28

 

$

4.62

 

Natural gas revenue

 

$

8,312,605

 

$

9,360,372

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil production (Bbl)

 

20,478

 

21,359

 

Average sales price per Bbl

 

$

83.60

 

$

64.15

 

Oil revenue

 

$

1,771,971

 

$

1,370,112

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equivalent production

 

2,066,710

 

2,151,771

 

 

The decrease in oil and gas revenue of $705,908 during the first six months of 2011 compared with the first six months of 2010 is comprised of a 4% decrease in equivalent oil and gas production primarily due to normal

 

33



Table of Contents

 

production declines on our existing wells partially offset by the new production from recompletion projects during 2010 and the six months of 2011 and a decrease in the average gas price of $0.34 per Mcf, partially offset by a $19.45 per Bbl increase in the average oil price. The $705,908 decrease in oil and gas revenue during the first six months of 2011 represents a decrease of $247,267 related to the net decrease in oil and gas prices and a decrease of $431,641 related to the equivalent production increase.

 

General and Administrative Expense

 

The following table summarizes the components of general and administrative expense and stock-based compensation expense incurred during the periods presented.

 

 

 

For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total general and administrative costs

 

$

2,751,857

 

$

3,739,925

 

General and administrative costs allocated to drilling, completion and operating activities

 

(856,530

)

(696,946

)

General and administrative expense

 

$

1,895,327

 

$

3,042,979

 

General and administrative expenses per Mcfe

 

$

0.92

 

$

1.41

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total stock-based compensation costs

 

$

175,458

 

$

873,474

 

Stock-based compensation (costs) reduction in costs capitalized

 

720

 

1,370

 

Stock-based compensation

 

$

176,178

 

$

874,844

 

Stock-based compensation per Mcfe

 

$

0.08

 

$

0.41

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total general and administrative expense including stock-based compensation

 

$

2,071,505

 

$

3,917,823

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total general and administrative expense per Mcfe

 

$

1.00

 

$

1.82

 

 

General and administrative expense decreased by $1,846,318 ($0.82 per Mcfe) during the first six months of 2011 as compared with the first six months of 2010 primarily as the result of $950,000 in severance payments we agreed to make to our former president and CEO in connection with his resignation during January 2010 and increased compensation expense due to the payment of non-management employee bonuses of approximately $300,000 related to the successful completion of  asset sales and purchases during the first six months of 2010 as further discussed in Note 4 — Asset Sales in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. Additionally, stock-based compensation expense decreased by $698,666 during the first six months of 2011 as previously described.

 

Gain on Extinguishment of Debt

 

Gain on extinguishment of debt during the second quarter of 2010 represents the difference between the fair value of the 2015 Notes and the debt conversion derivative as compared to the carrying value of the 2011 Notes less unamortized debt issuance costs that were exchanged in a transaction that closed on June 25, 2010.

 

34



Table of Contents

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

From time-to-time, we enter into off-balance sheet arrangements and transactions that can give rise to off-balance sheet obligations. As of June 30, 2011, the off-balance sheet arrangements and transactions that we entered into include undrawn letters of credit, operating lease agreements, gathering, compression, processing and water disposal agreements and gas transportation commitments. We do not believe that these arrangements are reasonably likely to materially affect our liquidity or availability of, or requirements for, capital resources.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

Effective January 1, 2011, we adopted ASC guidance that requires enhanced disclosure detail in the level 3 reconciliation for fair value measurements. The adoption had no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Refer to Note 9 — Fair Value Measurement of the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further details regarding our assets and liabilities measured at fair value.

 

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

Some of the information in this Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Quarterly Report, including, without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected costs and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements.  These statements express, or are based on, our expectations about future events. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “project,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe” or “continue” or the negative thereof or similar terminology.

 

Although any forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report or otherwise expressed by or on behalf of us are, to the knowledge and in the judgment of our officers and directors, believed to be reasonable, there can be no assurances that any of these expectations will prove correct or that any of the actions that are planned will be taken. Forward-looking statements involve and can be affected by inaccurate assumptions or by known and unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause our actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any projection, estimate or forecasted result. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results include those discussed under Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in our 2010 10-K and under Part II Item 1A “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.

 

The following are among the important factors that could cause future results to differ materially from any projected, forecasted, estimated or budgeted amounts that we have discussed in this Quarterly Report:

 

·                  fluctuations in natural gas and oil prices;

 

·                  pipeline constraints;

 

·                  overall demand for natural gas and oil in the United States;

 

·                  changes in general economic conditions in the United States;

 

·                  our ability to manage interest rate and commodity price exposure;

 

35



Table of Contents

 

·                  changes in our borrowing arrangements, including the impact of borrowing base redeterminations;

 

·                  our ability to generate sufficient cash flows to operate;

 

·                  the condition of credit and capital markets in the United States;

 

·                  the amount, nature and timing of capital expenditures;

 

·                  estimated reserves of natural gas and oil;

 

·                  drilling of wells;

 

·                  acquisition and development of oil and gas properties;

 

·                  operating hazards inherent to the natural gas and oil business;

 

·                  timing and amount of future production of natural gas and oil;

 

·                  operating costs and other expenses;

 

·                  cash flows and anticipated liquidity;

 

·                  future operating results;

 

·                  marketing of oil and natural gas;

 

·                  federal and state regulatory or legislative developments;

 

·                  competition and regulation; and

 

·                  plans, objectives and expectations.

 

Any of these factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results implied by these or any other forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. We cannot assure you that our future results will meet our expectations. When you consider these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind these factors.  All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by these factors.  Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. We assume no duty to update or revise its forward-looking statements based on changes in internal estimates or expectations or otherwise.

 

36



Table of Contents

 

GLOSSARY OF NATURAL GAS AND OIL TERMS

 

The following is a description of the meanings of some of the natural gas and oil industry terms used that may be used in this Quarterly Report.

 

Bbl.  One stock tank barrel, or 42 U.S. gallons liquid volume, used in reference to crude oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.

 

Bbl/d.  One Bbl per day.

 

Btu or British Thermal Unit.  The quantity of heat required to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit.

 

Completion.  The installation of permanent equipment for the production of natural gas or oil, or in the case of a dry well, the reporting of abandonment to the appropriate agency.

 

Condensate. A mixture of hydrocarbons that exists in the gaseous phase at original reservoir temperature and pressure, but that, when produced, is in the liquid phase at surface pressure and temperature.

 

Developed acreage.  The number of acres that are allocated or assignable to productive wells or wells capable of production.

 

Development well.  A well drilled within the proved area of an oil or gas reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.

 

Dry well.  An exploratory or development well that proves to be incapable of producing either oil or gas in sufficient quantities to justify completion as an oil or gas well.

 

Exploratory well.  A well drilled to find a new field or to find a new reservoir in a field previously found to be productive of oil and gas in another reservoir.

 

Farm-in or farm-out.  An agreement under which the owner of a working interest in a natural gas and oil lease assigns the working interest or a portion of the working interest to another party who desires to drill on the leased acreage.  Generally, the assignee is required to drill one or more wells in order to earn its interest in the acreage.  The assignor usually retains a royalty or reversionary interest in the lease.  The interest received by an assignee is a “farm-in” while the interest transferred by the assignor is a “farm-out.”

 

Field.  An area consisting of either a single reservoir or multiple reservoirs, all grouped on or related to the same individual geological structural feature and/or stratigraphic condition.

 

Gross acres or gross wells.  The total acres or wells, as the case may be, in which a working interest is owned.

 

Lead.  A specific geographic area which, based on supporting geological, geophysical or other data, is deemed to have potential for the discovery of commercial hydrocarbons.

 

Mcf.  Thousand cubic feet of natural gas.

 

Mcfe.  Thousand cubic feet equivalent, determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one Bbl of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.

 

37



Table of Contents

 

MMBtu.  Million British Thermal Units.

 

Net acres or net wells.  The sum of the fractional working interest owned in gross acres or wells, as the case may be.

 

Net feet of pay.  The true vertical thickness of reservoir rock estimated to both contain hydrocarbons and be capable of contributing to producing rates.

 

Present value of future net revenues or present value of discounted future net cash flows or present value or PV-10.  The pre-tax present value of estimated future revenues to be generated from the production of proved reserves calculated in accordance with SEC guidelines, net of estimated production and future development costs, using average prices during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, and costs as of the date of estimation without future escalation, without giving effect to non-property related expenses such as general and administrative expenses, debt service and depreciation, depletion and amortization, and discounted using an annual discount rate of 10%.

 

Productive well.  A producing well and a well that is found to be mechanically capable of production.

 

Prospect.  A specific geographic area which, based on supporting geological, geophysical or other data and also preliminary economic analysis using reasonably anticipated prices and costs, is deemed to have potential for the discovery of commercial hydrocarbons.

 

Proved area.  The part of a property to which proved reserves have been specifically attributed.

 

Proved developed oil and gas reserves.  Proved developed oil and gas reserves are reserves that can be expected to be recovered: (i) through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and (ii) through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well.

 

Proved oil and gas reserves. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible—from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations—prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time. (i) The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes: (A) The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and (B) Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data. (ii) In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited by the lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a lower contact with reasonable certainty. (iii) Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty. (iv) Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when: (A) Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties

 

38



Table of Contents

 

no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based; and (B) The project has been approved for development  by all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities. (v) Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions.

 

Proved properties.  Properties with proved reserves.

 

Proved undeveloped reserves.  Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. (i) Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances. (ii) Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances, justify a longer time. (iii) Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, as defined in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.

 

Reservoir. A porous and permeable underground formation containing a natural accumulation of producible natural gas and/or oil that is confined by impermeable rock or water barriers and is individual and separate from other reservoirs.

 

Service well.  A well drilled or completed for the purpose of supporting production in an existing field. Specific purposes of service wells include gas injection, water injection, steam injection, air injection, salt-water disposal, water supply for injection, observation, or injection for in-situ combustion.

 

Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows.    The discounted future net cash flows relating to proved reserves based on average prices during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period and period-end costs and statutory tax rates (adjusted for permanent differences) and a 10-percent annual discount rate.

 

Stratigraphic test well. A drilling effort, geologically directed, to obtain information pertaining to a specific geologic condition. Such wells customarily arc drilled without the intent of being completed for hydrocarbon production. This classification also includes tests identified as core tests and all types of expendable holes related to hydrocarbon exploration. Stratigraphic test wells are classified as (a) “exploratory type,” if not drilled in a proved area, or (b) “development type,” if drilled in a proved area.

 

Undeveloped acreage.  Lease acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of economic quantities of natural gas and oil regardless of whether such acreage contains proved reserves.

 

Unproved properties.  Properties with no proved reserves.

 

39



Table of Contents

 

Working interest.  The operating interest that gives the owner the right to drill, produce and conduct operating activities on the property and receive a share of production.

 

ITEM 3 - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Commodity Price Risk

 

Our results of operations and operating cash flows are affected by changes in market prices for oil and natural gas. To mitigate a portion of our exposure to adverse market changes, we have entered into various derivative instruments. As of June 30, 2011, our derivative instruments consisted of one swap agreement for our 2011 production and one costless collar agreement for our production from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012. As of June 30, 2011, the fair value of these agreements is a current liability of $25,193 and a non-current asset of $19,643. These instruments allow us to predict with greater certainty the effective natural gas prices to be received for our hedged production. Our derivative contracts are described below:

 

·                  For our swap instrument, we receive a fixed price for the hedged commodity and pay a floating market price to the counterparty. The fixed-price payment and the floating-price payment are netted, resulting in a net amount due to or from the counterparty.

 

·                  Our costless collar contains a fixed floor price (put) and ceiling price (call). If the market price exceeds the call strike price or falls below the put strike price, we receive the fixed price and pay the market price. If the market price is between the call and the put strike prices, no payments will be due from either party.

 

The swap and collar contracts allow us to predict with greater certainty the effective natural gas prices that we will receive for our hedged production and to benefit from operating cash flows when market prices are less than the fixed prices of the contracts. However, we will not benefit from market prices that are higher than the fixed prices in the contracts for the hedged production. Our hedging contracts have no requirements for us to post additional collateral based upon the changes in the market value of our hedge instruments.

 

Our swap agreement as of June 30, 2011 is summarized in the table below:

 

Agreement
Type

 

Remaining
Term

 

Quantity

 

Fixed Price
Counterparty
payer

 

Floating Price (a)
Gasco payer

Swap

 

7/11 — 12/11

 

2,000 MMBtu/day

 

$4.00/MMBtu

 

NW Rockies

 


(a)           Northwest Pipeline Rocky Mountains — Inside FERC first of month index price.

 

Our costless collar agreement as of June 30, 2011 is summarized in the table below:

 

Agreement
Type

 

Remaining
Term

 

Quantity

 

Index
Price (a)

 

Call Price
Counterparty
buyer

 

Put Price
Gasco buyer

Costless collar

 

1/12 — 12/12

 

2,000 MMBtu/day

 

NW Rockies

 

$4.25/MMBtu

 

$5.12/MMBtu

 


(a)           Northwest Pipeline Rocky Mountains — Inside FERC first of month index price.

 

The prices we receive for production depend on many factors outside of our control including volatility in the

 

40



Table of Contents

 

differences between product prices at sales points and the applicable index price. Based on our average daily production for the six months ended June 30, 2011, our annual revenue would increase or decrease by approximately $41,000 for each $1.00 per barrel change in crude oil prices and $389,000 for each $0.10 per Mcf change in natural gas prices.

 

Warrant Derivative Risk

 

On June 15, 2011, we issued the June Warrants to purchase 18,750,000 shares of common stock with an  initial exercise price of $0.35 per share (subject to adjustment) with a sixty-month term, as further described in Note 3 — Stock Offerings in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements.  The Warrants contain a contingent cash settlement provision at the option of the holder and accordingly, are classified as a derivative liability and are subject to the classification and measurement standards for derivative financial instruments. Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of the Company’s common stock, which has a high-historical volatility. Based on the fair value calculation as of June 30, 2011, the warrant derivative liability would increase or decrease by approximately $1.3 million for each $0.10 change in the trading price of our common stock.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

We do not currently use interest rate derivatives to mitigate our exposure, including under our Credit Facility, to the volatility in interest rates. A 1.0% increase in interest rates on the average borrowings outstanding during the first six months of 2011 would increase interest expense by approximately $77,000 per year.

 

ITEM 4 - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), we have evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow such persons to make timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

 

Based upon the results of our evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011.

 

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting during the Second Quarter of 2011

 

There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act) during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

41



Table of Contents

 

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1 -                                 Legal Proceedings

 

For a discussion of our legal proceedings please see Note 11 — Legal Proceedings of the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements included herein.  We do not expect the outcome of any of pending proceedings to have a material adverse affect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Item 1A -                        Risk Factors

 

Except as noted below, information about material risks related to our business, financial condition and results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 does not materially differ from that set out in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our 2010 10-K and in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.

 

Certain U.S. federal income tax deductions currently available with respect to oil and gas exploration and development may be eliminated as a result of future legislation.

 

President Obama’s Proposed Fiscal Year 2012 Budget recommends elimination of certain key U.S. federal income tax incentives currently available to oil and natural gas exploration and production companies, and legislation has been introduced in Congress which would implement many of these proposals. These changes include, but are not limited to, (i) the repeal of the percentage depletion allowance for oil and natural gas properties, (ii) the elimination of current deductions for intangible drilling and development costs, (iii) the elimination of the deduction for certain domestic production activities, and (iv) an extension of the amortization period for certain geological and geophysical expenditures. It is unclear whether any such changes will be enacted or how soon any such changes could become effective. The passage of the proposed legislation or any other similar changes in U.S. federal income tax laws could eliminate certain tax deductions that are currently available with respect to oil and gas exploration and development, and any such change could negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

The adoption of climate change legislation by Congress could result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the oil and natural gas we produce.

 

In December 2009, the EPA determined that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other “greenhouse gases” (“GHG”) present an endangerment to public health and the environment because emissions of such gases are, according to the EPA, contributing to warming of the earth’s atmosphere and other climatic changes. Based on these findings, the EPA has begun adopting and implementing regulations to restrict emissions of greenhouse gases under existing provisions of the federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”).

 

In response to findings that emissions of GHGs present an endangerment to public heath and the environment, the EPA has adopted regulations under existing provisions of the CAA that would require a reduction in emissions of GHGs from motor vehicles and also may trigger PSD and Title V permit requirements for GHG emissions from certain stationary sources when the motor vehicle standards took effect on January 2, 2011. The EPA rules have tailored the PSD and Title V permitting programs to apply to certain stationary sources of GHG emissions in a multi-step process, with the largest sources first subject to permitting. These EPA rulemakings could adversely affect our operations and restrict or delay our ability to obtain air permits for new or modified facilities. The EPA also published a final rule on November 30, 2010 expanding its existing GHG emissions reporting rule to include onshore and offshore oil and natural gas production and onshore oil and natural gas processing, transmission, storage, and distribution activities, which may include certain of our operations, beginning in 2012 for emissions occurring in 2011. In addition, Congress has actively considered

 

42



Table of Contents

 

legislation to reduce emissions of GHGs, and almost one-half of the states have already taken legal measures to reduce emissions of GHGs, primarily through the planned development of GHG emission inventories and/or regional GHG cap and trade programs. The adoption of any legislation or regulations that limits emissions of GHGs from our equipment and operations could require us to incur costs to reduce emissions of GHGs associated with our operations or could adversely affect demand for the oil and natural gas we produce. Consequently, legislation and regulatory programs to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Finally, it should be noted that some scientific studies have concluded that increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the Earth’s atmosphere may produce climate changes that have significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, droughts, and floods and other climatic events; if any such effects were to occur, they could have an adverse effect on our assets and operations.

 

Federal legislation and state legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing could result in increased costs and additional operating restrictions or delays.

 

Hydraulic fracturing is an important and common practice that is used to stimulate production of hydrocarbons, particularly natural gas, from tight formations such as shales. The process involves the injection of water, sand and chemicals under pressure into formations to fracture the surrounding rock and stimulate production. The process is typically regulated by state oil and gas commissions or a state’s environmental regulatory agency. In addition, the EPA recently asserted federal regulatory authority over hydraulic fracturing involving diesel additives under the Safe Drinking Water Act’s Underground Injection Control Program. While the EPA has yet to take action to enforce or implement this newly asserted regulatory authority, industry groups have filed suit challenging the EPA’s recent decision. At the same time, the EPA has commenced a study of the potential environmental impacts of hydraulic fracturing activities, with initial results of the study expected to be available in late 2012 and final results in 2014. In addition, for the second consecutive session, the federal Congress is considering two companion bills, known as the “Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act,” or “FRAC Act,” that would repeal an exemption in the federal Safe Drinking Water Act for the underground injection of hydraulic fracturing fluids, other than diesel near drinking water sources. This legislation, if adopted, would require federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing as well as disclosure of the chemicals used in the fracturing process.

 

On June 28, 2011, EPA proposed a rule that would establish new air emission controls for oil and natural gas production and natural gas processing operations.  Specifically, EPA’s proposed rule package includes New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”) to address sulfur dioxide and volatile organic compounds (“VOCs”), and a separate set of emission standards to address hazardous air pollutants.  EPA’s proposal would require the reduction of VOC emissions from oil and natural gas production facilities, including emissions from hydraulic fracturing operations, by (1) mandating the use of “green completions” for hydraulic fracturing, which is a process whereby the gas and natural gas liquids that come to the surface during completion of the fracturing process are recovered instead of vented; (2) requiring the use of dry seals in centrifugal compressors; (3) establishing regular rod packing replacement requirements for reciprocating compressors; and (4) establishing quantitative emissions limitations for pneumatic controllers.  In addition, the proposed rule would require condensate and oil storage tanks to reduce their uncontrolled VOC emissions by 95%.  To address air toxics in the production sector, EPA proposes to (1) require all large dehydrators to reduce their hazardous air pollutant (“HAP”) emissions by 95%; (2) establish emission limits for small dehydrators at major sources; and (3) require all crude oil and condensate storage tanks to reduce their HAP emissions by 95%.  EPA’s proposed rules would also impose a number of new requirements on natural gas processing.  To reduce VOC emissions, natural gas processing plants would be subject to new leak detection requirements.  The proposed NSPS for sulfur dioxide would subject natural gas processing plants with an acid gas content of at least 50% hydrogen sulfide to more stringent emission standards.  With respect to air toxics, EPA proposes to remove the 1 ton per

 

43



Table of Contents

 

year benzene compliance alternative for large dehydrators and establish emissions limits for small glycol dehydrators at large sources that process natural gas.  If finalized, these rules could require a number of modifications to our operations including the installation of new capital equipment.  Compliance with such rules could result in significant costs and adversely impact our business.

 

Also, some states, including New York, Pennsylvania and Wyoming, have adopted, and other states are considering adopting, regulations imposing disclosure obligations, mitigation of impacts associated with, or restrictions on, hydraulic fracturing activities in certain circumstances. New York has imposed a de facto moratorium on the issuance of permits for high-volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing until state-administered environmental impact assessments are finalized. Pennsylvania has adopted a variety of regulations limiting how and where fracturing can be performed and Wyoming has adopted legislation requiring drilling operators conducting hydraulic fracturing activities in that state to publicly disclose the chemicals used in the fracturing process.

 

If new federal or state laws, regulations or other policy determinations that significantly restrict hydraulic fracturing are adopted, such legal requirements could delay our ability to engage in hydraulic fracturing activities, make it more difficult or costly for us to perform hydraulic fracturing or otherwise reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that we are ultimately able to produce from our reserves. In addition, if hydraulic fracturing is also regulated at the federal level, exploration and production activities that entail hydraulic fracturing could be subject to additional regulation and permitting requirements and attendant permitting delays and potential increases in costs. Such new legislation or regulation could lead to operational delays or increased operating costs and could result in additional burdens that could increase the costs and delay the development of unconventional oil and natural gas resources from shale formations that are not commercial without the use of hydraulic fracturing. Some or all of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Item 2 -                                 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

None.

 

Item 6 –                              Exhibits

 

The following is a list of exhibits filed or furnished (as indicated) as part of this Quarterly Report.  Where so noted, exhibits which were previously filed are incorporated herein by reference.

 

Exhibit Number

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

3.1

 

Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 31, 1999, filed on January 21, 2000, File No. 000-26321).

 

 

 

3.2

 

Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K/A dated January 31, 2001, filed on February 16, 2001, File No. 000-26321).

 

 

 

3.3

 

Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated June 21, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed on August 9, 2005, File No. 001-32369).

 

44



Table of Contents

 

3.4

 

Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Gasco Energy, Inc., dated April 8, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated April 8, 2009, filed on April 8, 2009, File No. 001-32369).

 

 

 

3.5

 

Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated September 20, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on September 20, 2010, File No. 001-32369).

 

 

 

4.1

 

Form of Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated June 10, 2011, filed on June 10, 2011, File No. 001-32369).

 

 

 

10.1*#

 

Gasco Energy, Inc. 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

 

 

 

31.1*

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

 

 

 

31.2*

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

 

 

 

32.1**

 

Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

 

 

 

32.2**

 

Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

 

 

 

101.INS***

 

XBRL Instance Document

 

 

 

101.SCH***

 

XBRL Schema Document

 

 

 

101.CAL***

 

XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.LAB***

 

XBRL Label Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.PRE***

 

XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.DEF***

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 


*      Filed herewith.

**    Furnished herewith.

***  Furnished, not filed. Users of this data submitted electronically herewith are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

#      Identifies management contracts and compensating plans or arrangements.

 

45



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

GASCO ENERGY, INC.

 

 

 

 

Date: August 9, 2011

By:

/s/ Peggy A. Herald

 

 

Peggy A. Herald, Vice President and

 

 

Chief Accounting Officer

 

 

(Principal Financial Officer

 

 

and Authorized Officer)

 

46



Table of Contents

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit Number

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

3.1

 

Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 31, 1999, filed on January 21, 2000, File No. 000-26321).

 

 

 

3.2

 

Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K/A dated January 31, 2001, filed on February 16, 2001, File No. 000-26321).

 

 

 

3.3

 

Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated June 21, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed on August 9, 2005, File No. 001-32369).

 

 

 

3.4

 

Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Gasco Energy, Inc., dated April 8, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated April 8, 2009, filed on April 8, 2009, File No. 001-32369).

 

 

 

3.5

 

Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated September 20, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on September 20, 2010, File No. 001-32369).

 

 

 

4.1

 

Form of Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated June 10, 2011, filed on June 10, 2011, File No. 001-32369).

 

 

 

10.1*#

 

Gasco Energy, Inc. 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

 

 

 

31.1*

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

 

 

 

31.2*

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

 

 

 

32.1**

 

Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

 

 

 

32.2**

 

Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

 

 

 

101.INS***

 

XBRL Instance Document

 

 

 

101.SCH***

 

XBRL Schema Document

 

 

 

101.CAL***

 

XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.LAB***

 

XBRL Label Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.PRE***

 

XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

 

 

 

101.DEF***

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 

47



Table of Contents

 


*      Filed herewith.

**    Furnished herewith.

***  Furnished, not filed. Users of this data submitted electronically herewith are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

#      Identifies management contracts and compensating plans or arrangements.

 

48