Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - FORM 8-K - HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. | c20647e8vk.htm |
EX-99.2 - EXHIBIT 99.2 - HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. | c20647exv99w2.htm |
Exhibit 99.1
NEWS RELEASE |
THE HARTFORD REPORTS SECOND QUARTER 2011 RESULTS AND
ANNOUNCES $500 MILLION SHARE REPURCHASE AUTHORIZATION
ANNOUNCES $500 MILLION SHARE REPURCHASE AUTHORIZATION
| Board of Directors authorizes a $500 million repurchase program | ||
| Second quarter core earnings* of $12 million and net income of $24 million, as previously announced on July 13, 2011 | ||
| Book value per diluted common share increased 13% to $43.11 as of June 30, 2011 compared with June 30, 2010 | ||
| Total P&C current accident year catastrophe losses of 18.2 points, or $290 million after tax, the highest level of second quarter catastrophe losses in The Hartfords history |
HARTFORD, Conn., August 3, 2011 The Hartford (NYSE:HIG) reported second quarter 2011 net income
of $24 million, or $0.03 per diluted share. In the second quarter of 2010, the company reported net
income of $76 million, or $0.14 per diluted share.
Core earnings for the second quarter of 2011 were $12 million, or $0.00 per diluted share. In the
second quarter of 2010, core earnings were $193 million, or $0.38 per diluted share. Weighted
average diluted shares outstanding were 482.4 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared with
480.2 million in the second quarter of 2010.
The Hartfords fundamental business results demonstrated solid performance in the second quarter,
although catastrophe losses and an asbestos reserve increase affected results, said Liam E. McGee,
chairman, president and chief executive officer of The Hartford. We continue to execute our
strategy and delivered 8% written premium growth in P&C Commercial Markets; an improved combined
ratio, excluding catastrophes, in Consumer Markets; and core earnings growth in Wealth Management.
Todays $500 million share repurchase announcement is a prudent next capital management step,
reflecting The Hartfords strengthened balance sheet, reduced risk profile, and confidence in the
business moving forward. This program is an important action towards increasing return on equity
and generating earnings per share growth, added McGee.
1
SECOND QUARTER 2011 FINANCIAL RESULTS
Quarterly Results | ||||||||||||
(in millions except per share data) | 2Q 11 | 2Q 10 | Change | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 24 | $ | 76 | (68 | %) | ||||||
Net income available to
common shareholders per diluted
share |
$ | 0.03 | $ | 0.14 | (79 | %) | ||||||
Core earnings |
$ | 12 | $ | 193 | (94 | %) | ||||||
Core earnings available to
common shareholders per diluted
share* |
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.38 | (100 | %) | ||||||
Book value per diluted share |
$ | 43.11 | $ | 38.16 | 13 | % | ||||||
Book value per diluted share
(ex. accumulated other comprehensive
income (AOCI))* |
$ | 43.26 | $ | 40.95 | 6 | % | ||||||
The second quarters earnings included certain items that affected results totaling $538 million,
or $1.12 per share (all numbers are after tax):
| Current accident year catastrophe losses on 12 events totaled $290 million, or 18.2 points on the property and casualty combined ratio for P&C Commercial and Consumer Markets; | ||
| A prior year reserve increase of $206 million, principally comprised of $189 million of reserve strengthening related to the companys annual review of its legacy asbestos liabilities. The increase was primarily driven by higher frequency and severity of mesothelioma claims, particularly against certain smaller, more peripheral insureds; | ||
| A charge of $73 million related to the write-off of capitalized costs associated with a policy administration software project that was discontinued in Consumer Markets; | ||
| A tax benefit of $52 million related to a resolution of a tax matter with the IRS for the computation of dividends received deductions for years 1998, 2000 and 2001; and | ||
| A negative DAC unlock charge, resulting in a $21 million reduction in core earnings. |
2
COMMERCIAL MARKETS
Second Quarter 2011 Highlights:
| P&C Commercial written premiums increased 8% from the second quarter of 2010 reflecting strong retention, renewal written pricing increases, and economic exposure growth | ||
| P&C Commercial pricing improved in Small Commercial and Middle Market, led by rate increases in workers compensation | ||
| Group Benefits loss ratio improved slightly to 78.0% in the second quarter of 2011; incidence rates are showing preliminary signs of stabilization, but remain elevated |
P&C Commercial
2Q 11 | 2Q 10 | |||||||
Written Premiums (in millions) |
$ | 1,498 | $ | 1,388 | ||||
Combined Ratio1 |
92.8 | % | 93.6 | % | ||||
[1] | Excludes catastrophes and prior year development* |
Group Benefits
2Q 11 | 2Q 10 | |||||||
Fully Insured Premiums2
(in millions) |
$ | 1,013 | $ | 1,041 | ||||
Loss Ratio2 |
78.0 | % | 78.3 | % | ||||
[2] | Excludes buyout premiums |
Commercial Markets net income was $162 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared with
$318 million in the second quarter of 2010. Core earnings for the segment were $129 million in the
second quarter of 2011 compared with $290 million in the second quarter of 2010.
Net income and core earnings in the second quarter of 2011 included $166 million pretax, or 11.0
points, on the P&C Commercial combined ratio, of current accident year catastrophe losses compared
with $83 million, or 5.9 points, in the second quarter of 2010. The second quarter of 2011 also
included $31 million of prior year reserve strengthening in the P&C Commercial segment, $10 million
of which was for catastrophes. Prior year reserve releases in the second quarter of 2010 were $139
million, including $4 million for catastrophes.
P&C Commercial, which generated net income of $121 million in the second quarter of 2011, continued
to see favorable top line trends. As a result of the strong premium growth in P&C Commercial in the
first half of the year, the company increased key driver guidance for 2011 full year written
premiums to the range of 5% to 8%.
3
Group Benefits second quarter 2011 net income was $41 million compared with $48 million in the
second quarter of 2010, reflecting lower investment income and lower net realized gains. Total
premiums and other considerations of $1.1 billion were essentially unchanged from the second
quarter of 2010 as a result of a very competitive marketplace and the companys commitment to
disciplined pricing.
CONSUMER MARKETS
Second Quarter 2011 Highlights:
| 2011 accident year underwriting results* before catastrophes continued to show significant year-over-year improvement, due to improving margins in auto | ||
| Announced new affinity partnership with the Sierra Club, an organization with over 1 million members, resulting in a marketing base of more than 6 million new affinity member households generated over the past nine months | ||
| New business written premium for AARP auto turned positive, with a 1% increase in new business premiums |
2Q 11 | 2Q 10 | |||||||
Written Premiums (in millions) |
$ | 969 | $ | 1,033 | ||||
Combined Ratio1 |
91.6 | % | 93.2 | % | ||||
[1] | Excludes catastrophes and prior year development* |
Consumer Markets reported a net loss of $174 million for the second quarter of 2011 compared
with a net loss of $13 million in the second quarter of 2010. Core losses were $179 million in the
second quarter of 2011 compared with core losses of $15 million in the second quarter of 2010. The
results for the second quarter of 2011 included $281 million pretax, or 29.9 points on the combined
ratio, of current accident year catastrophe losses compared with $146 million, or 14.6 points, in
the second quarter of 2010. In addition, the write-off of capitalized costs associated with a
discontinued policy administration software project resulted in a $73 million after-tax charge to
net and core losses in the second quarter of 2011.
WEALTH MANAGEMENT
Second Quarter 2011 Highlights:
| Assets under management of $309.6 billion as of June 30, 2011, were 11% higher than a year ago | ||
| Individual Life sales in the second quarter of 2011 increased 14% compared with the second quarter of 2010 | ||
| The company continued the build out of its Japan tail hedge program and is on track for full completion by year end |
4
Assets Under Management
(in billions) | June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | Change | |||||||||
Global Annuity |
$ | 146.9 | $ | 142.4 | 3 | % | ||||||
Non-Proprietary Mutual Funds |
$ | 58.1 | $ | 47.3 | 23 | % | ||||||
Retirement Plans |
$ | 55.5 | $ | 43.8 | 27 | % | ||||||
Life Insurance |
$ | 49.1 | $ | 46.4 | 6 | % | ||||||
Wealth Management net income was $351 million for the second quarter of 2011 compared with $26
million in the second quarter of 2010. Core earnings for the second quarter of 2011 were $312
million compared with $84 million in the second quarter of 2010. As a result of global equity
market performance, second quarter 2011 core earnings included a DAC unlock charge of $21 million
compared with a DAC unlock charge of $168 million in the second quarter of 2010. In addition, net
income and core earnings for Wealth Management included a $52 million tax benefit related to the
dividends received deduction for tax years 1998, 2000 and 2001.
The company is increasing the full-year 2011 ex-DAC unlock ROA guidance for the Global Annuity
segment to a range of 42 to 47 basis points to reflect higher assets under management due to global
equity market appreciation, better than expected limited partnership returns for the first half of
2011, and the tax benefit related to the dividends received deductions.
INVESTMENTS
Second Quarter 2011 Highlights:
| Pre-tax net investment income excluding trading securities decreased 4% in the second quarter of 2011 compared with the second quarter of 2010 | ||
| Net impairment losses and changes to the mortgage loan loss reserve in the second quarter of 2011 resulted in $3 million realized gain | ||
| Net unrealized gain position was $819 million at June 30, 2011 versus a net unrealized loss of $161 million at March 31, 2011 |
Net investment income, excluding trading securities, was $1.1 billion in the second quarter of
2011, a 4% decline compared with the second quarter of 2010. Net investment income declined as a
result of lower portfolio yields, consistent with market trends, which more than offset the growth
in the companys investment portfolio. Annualized returns on limited partnerships and other
alternative investments, which are less stable than fixed income yields, were 17% in the second
quarter of 2011 compared with 20% in the second quarter of 2010.
The net unrealized gain position improved $980 million since March 31, 2011, primarily due to lower
market interest rates. The Hartfords total invested assets, excluding trading securities, were
$99.8 billion as of June 30, 2011, up 2% compared with $97.9 billion at June 30, 2010.
5
CORPORATE AND OTHER
The Corporate and Other segment net loss for the second quarter of 2011 was $315 million compared
with a net loss of $255 million in the second quarter of 2010. Results for the current quarter
included an after-tax reserve charge of $189 million due to the companys annual review of its
legacy asbestos liabilities. In the second quarter of 2010, the reserve increase for the 2010
asbestos review was $110 million.
Also included in the current quarter Corporate and Other segment results is a $74 million after-tax
charge included in discontinued operations for the previously announced disposition of Federal
Trust Corporation. In the second quarter of 2010, the company recognized a goodwill impairment of
$101 million related to Federal Trust Corporation.
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
The Hartfords shareholders equity rose 15% at June 30, 2011 to $21.7 billion compared with $18.9
billion at June 30, 2010. Book value per diluted share, which includes the dilutive effect of
derivative securities such as the companys outstanding warrants and mandatory convertible
preferred stock, was $43.11 at June 30, 2011, an increase of 13% compared with $38.16 at June 30,
2010. The improvement in shareholders equity and book value per diluted share reflects the
companys net income of $1.8 billion over the past 12 months and the improvement in AOCI of $1.3
billion, which was offset by dividends paid and other items during the past year. Excluding AOCI,
book value per diluted share* was $43.26 at June 30, 2011, an increase of 6% from the $40.95 at
June 30, 2010.
SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM
The Hartfords Board of Directors has authorized a $500 million share repurchase program. The
program, which includes the ability to repurchase warrants or other derivative securities, is
expected to be accretive to the companys book value and core earnings per diluted share.
Repurchases may be made in the open market through derivative, accelerated repurchase and other
privately negotiated transactions, and through plans designed to comply with Rule 10b5-1(c) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
While the company expects to complete
the $500 million share repurchase program by early 2012, any share repurchases are at the
companys discretion, subject to the three-year period authorized by The Hartfords
Board of Directors. The timing of repurchases will be dependent upon various factors, including
the market price of the companys securities, the companys capital position,
consideration of the effect of any repurchases on the companys financial strength or
credit ratings, and other considerations. The repurchase program may be modified, extended or
terminated by the Board of Directors at any time.
6
CONFERENCE CALL
The Hartford will discuss its second quarter 2011 results in a conference call on Thursday, August
4 at 9:00 a.m. EDT. The call, along with a slide presentation, can be simultaneously accessed
through The Hartfords website at www.ir.thehartford.com. The slide presentation will be posted on
The Hartfords website at 8:00 a.m. EDT on August 4.
More detailed financial information can be found in The Hartfords Investor Financial Supplement
for the second quarter of 2011, which is available on The Hartfords website,
www.ir.thehartford.com.
* | Denotes financial measures not calculated based on generally accepted accounting principles (non-GAAP). More information is provided in the Discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures section below. |
ABOUT THE HARTFORD
The Hartford Financial Services Group Inc. (NYSE: HIG) is a leading provider of insurance and
wealth management services for millions of consumers and businesses worldwide. The Hartford is
consistently recognized for its superior service and as one of the worlds most ethical companies.
More information on the company and its financial performance is available at www.thehartford.com.
HIG-F |
||
Media Contact: |
Investor Contact: | |
Dave Snowden |
Sabra Purtill | |
860-547-3397 |
860-547-8691 | |
david.snowden@thehartford.com |
sabra.purtill@thehartford.com | |
Ryan Greenier | ||
860-547-8844 | ||
ryan.greenier@thehartford.com |
7
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
INCOME STATEMENTS BY DIVISION
($ in millions)
INCOME STATEMENTS BY DIVISION
($ in millions)
Three months ended June 30, 2011
Commercial | Consumer | Wealth | Corporate & | |||||||||||||||||
Markets | Markets | Management | Other | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
$ | 2,579 | $ | 939 | $ | 26 | $ | 1 | $ | 3,545 | ||||||||||
Fee income |
14 | | 1,152 | 53 | 1,219 | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale and other |
345 | 49 | 660 | 50 | 1,104 | |||||||||||||||
Equity securities held for trading [1] |
| | (597 | ) | | (597 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total net investment income (loss) |
345 | 49 | 63 | 50 | 507 | |||||||||||||||
Other revenues |
26 | 36 | | (1 | ) | 61 | ||||||||||||||
Net realized capital gains |
23 | 2 | 34 | 10 | 69 | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
2,987 | 1,026 | 1,275 | 113 | 5,401 | |||||||||||||||
Benefits, losses, and loss adjustment expenses |
1,997 | 904 | 788 | 287 | 3,976 | |||||||||||||||
Benefits, losses, and loss adjustment expenses
returns credited on International variable
annuities [1] |
| | (597 | ) | | (597 | ) | |||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
353 | 160 | 322 | | 835 | |||||||||||||||
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
461 | 240 | 452 | 71 | 1,224 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | 128 | 128 | |||||||||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
2,811 | 1,304 | 965 | 486 | 5,566 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes |
176 | (278 | ) | 310 | (373 | ) | (165 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
11 | (104 | ) | (41 | ) | (135 | ) | (269 | ) | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
165 | (174 | ) | 351 | (238 | ) | 104 | |||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
(3 | ) | | | (77 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
162 | (174 | ) | 351 | (315 | ) | 24 | |||||||||||||
Less: Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
(3 | ) | | | (77 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||||||||||
Less: Net realized gains, net of tax and DAC,
excluded from core earnings |
36 | 5 | 39 | 12 | 92 | |||||||||||||||
Core earnings (loss) |
$ | 129 | $ | (179 | ) | $ | 312 | $ | (250 | ) | $ | 12 |
Three months ended June 30, 2010
Commercial | Consumer | Wealth | Corporate & | |||||||||||||||||
Markets | Markets | Management | Other | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Earned premiums |
$ | 2,477 | $ | 995 | $ | 36 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 3,506 | |||||||||
Fee income |
12 | | 1,122 | 52 | 1,186 | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale and other |
355 | 49 | 673 | 71 | 1,148 | |||||||||||||||
Equity securities held for trading [1] |
| | (2,649 | ) | | (2,649 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total net investment income (loss) |
355 | 49 | (1,976 | ) | 71 | (1,501 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other revenues |
25 | 40 | | | 65 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
36 | 2 | (42 | ) | 13 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
2,905 | 1,086 | (860 | ) | 134 | 3,265 | ||||||||||||||
Benefits, losses, and loss adjustment expenses |
1,645 | 822 | 955 | 170 | 3,592 | |||||||||||||||
Benefits, losses, and loss adjustment expenses
returns credited on International variable annuities
[1] |
| | (2,649 | ) | | (2,649 | ) | |||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
355 | 168 | 412 | | 935 | |||||||||||||||
Insurance operating costs and other expenses |
468 | 123 | 438 | 82 | 1,111 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | 132 | 132 | |||||||||||||||
Total benefits and expenses |
2,468 | 1,113 | (844 | ) | 384 | 3,121 | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes |
437 | (27 | ) | (16 | ) | (250 | ) | 144 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
122 | (14 | ) | (43 | ) | (96 | ) | (31 | ) | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
315 | (13 | ) | 27 | (154 | ) | 175 | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
3 | | (1 | ) | (101 | ) | (99 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
318 | (13 | ) | 26 | (255 | ) | 76 | |||||||||||||
Less: Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net
of tax |
3 | | (1 | ) | (101 | ) | (99 | ) | ||||||||||||
Less: Net realized gains (losses), net of tax and
DAC, excluded from core earnings |
25 | 2 | (57 | ) | 12 | (18 | ) | |||||||||||||
Core earnings (loss) |
$ | 290 | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 84 | $ | (166 | ) | $ | 193 |
[1] | Includes investment income and mark-to-market effects of equity securities, trading, supporting the international variable annuity business, which are classified in net investment income with corresponding amounts credited to policyholders within benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses. |
8
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
RESULTS BY SEGMENT
($ in millions, except per share data)
RESULTS BY SEGMENT
($ in millions, except per share data)
THREE MONTHS ENDED
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||
Property & Casualty Commercial |
99 | 256 | (61 | %) | ||||||||
Group Benefits |
30 | 34 | (12 | %) | ||||||||
Commercial Markets core earnings |
129 | 290 | (56 | %) | ||||||||
Consumer Markets core earnings (losses) |
(179 | ) | (15 | ) | NM | [1] | ||||||
Global Annuity |
224 | 153 | 46 | % | ||||||||
Life Insurance |
62 | 63 | (2 | %) | ||||||||
Retirement Plans |
20 | 13 | 54 | % | ||||||||
Mutual Funds |
27 | 23 | 17 | % | ||||||||
Wealth Management core earnings,
Excluding DAC Unlock |
333 | 252 | 32 | % | ||||||||
DAC unlock |
(21 | ) | (168 | ) | 88 | % | ||||||
Wealth Management core earnings |
312 | 84 | NM | |||||||||
Corporate and Other core losses |
(250 | ) | (166 | ) | (51 | %) | ||||||
Core earnings |
12 | 193 | (94 | %) | ||||||||
Add: Net realized capital gains
(losses), net of tax and DAC, excluded
from core earnings |
92 | (18 | ) | NM | ||||||||
Add: Income (loss) from discontinued
operations |
(80 | ) | (99 | ) | 19 | % | ||||||
Net Income |
24 | 76 | (68 | %) | ||||||||
PER SHARE DATA |
||||||||||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
||||||||||||
Core earnings |
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.38 | (100 | %) | ||||||
Add: Net realized capital gains
(losses), net of tax and DAC,
excluded from core earnings |
$ | 0.19 | $ | (0.04 | ) | NM | ||||||
Add: Loss from discontinued operations |
$ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | 20 | % | ||||
Net income available to common
shareholders |
$ | 0.03 | $ | 0.14 | (79 | %) | ||||||
[1] | NM: The Hartford defines increases or decreases greater than or equity to 200% or changes from a net gain to a net loss position, or vice versa, as NM or not meaningful. |
9
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
2011 FISCAL YEAR KEY DRIVER GUIDANCE
2011 FISCAL YEAR KEY DRIVER GUIDANCE
Commercial
Markets
P&C Commercial |
||
Combined Ratio1 |
92.5% 95.5% | |
Written Premium Growth |
5.0% 8.0%* | |
Group Benefits |
||
Loss Ratio |
76% 79% | |
Fully Insured Ongoing Premiums2 |
$3.9 $4.1 Billion |
[1] | Excludes catastrophes and prior year development | |
[2] | Guidance for fully insured ongoing premiums excludes buyout premiums and premium equivalents |
Consumer Markets
Consumer Markets |
||
Combined Ratio3 |
89.0% 92.0% | |
Written Premium Growth |
(5.5%) (2.5%) |
[3] | Excludes catastrophes and prior year development |
Wealth
Management
Deposits | Net Flows | Core Earnings ROA4 | ||||
Global Annuity |
| | 42 47 bps* | |||
U.S. Fixed and Variable Annuity |
$1.5 $2.5 Billion | ($13.5) ($11.5) Billion | | |||
Retirement Plans |
$8.5 $10.0 Billion | $0.5 $1.5 Billion | 8 12 bps | |||
Mutual Funds5 |
$16.0 $18.0 Billion | $2.0 $4.0 Billion | 9 13 bps | |||
Life Insurance |
||||||
Sales |
$210 $260 Million | |||||
After-tax Margin, excl. DAC
Unlocks6 |
12.0% 15.0% |
[4] | ROA outlooks exclude impact of DAC unlocks | |
[5] | Mutual Fund Deposits and Net Flows guidance excludes proprietary mutual funds | |
[6] | Guidance on after-tax margin is core earnings divided by total core revenue | |
* | Reflects updated guidance metric; see business division discussion for more details |
10
DISCUSSION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
The Hartford uses non-GAAP financial measures in this press release to assist investors in
analyzing the companys operating performance for the periods presented herein. Because The
Hartfords calculation of these measures may differ from similar measures used by other companies,
investors should be careful when comparing The Hartfords non-GAAP financial measures to those of
other companies. Definitions and calculations of other financial measures used in this press
release can be found in The Hartfords Investor Financial Supplement for the second quarter of
2011, which is available on The Hartfords website, www.ir.thehartford.com.
Book value per diluted common share excluding accumulated other comprehensive income
(AOCI): Book value per diluted common share excluding AOCI is a non-GAAP financial measure
based on a GAAP financial measure. It is calculated by dividing (a) common stockholders equity
excluding AOCI, net of tax, by (b) diluted common shares outstanding. The Hartford provides book
value per diluted common share excluding AOCI to enable investors to analyze the companys
shareholders equity excluding the effect of changes in the value of the companys investment
portfolio and other assets due to interest rates, currency and other factors. The Hartford believes
book value per diluted common share excluding AOCI is useful to investors because it eliminates the
effect of items that can fluctuate significantly from period to period, primarily based on changes
in market value. Shareholders equity per diluted common share is the most directly comparable GAAP
measure. A reconciliation of shareholders equity per diluted common share to book value per
diluted common share excluding AOCI as of June 30, 2011, and June 30, 2010, is set forth below.
THREE MONTHS ENDED | Year Over | |||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | Year 3 Month | ||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||
Shareholders equity per diluted common share, |
$ | 43.11 | $ | 38.16 | 13 | % | ||||||
including AOCI |
||||||||||||
Less: Per share impact of AOCI |
(0.15 | ) | (2.79 | ) | 95 | % | ||||||
Book value per diluted common share, excluding AOCI |
$ | 43.26 | $ | 40.95 | 6 | % | ||||||
Combined ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development: Combined
ratio before catastrophes and prior accident year development is a non-GAAP financial measure.
Combined ratio is the most directly comparable GAAP measure. The combined ratio is the sum of the
loss and loss adjustment expense ratio, the expense ratio and the policyholder dividend ratio. This
ratio measures the cost of losses and expenses for every $100 of earned premiums. A combined ratio
below 100% demonstrates a positive underwriting result, a non-GAAP financial measure described
below. A combined ratio above 100% indicates a negative underwriting result. The combined ratio
before catastrophes and prior accident year development represents the combined ratio for the
current accident year, excluding the impact of catastrophes. The company believes this ratio is an
important measure of the trend in profitability since it removes the impact of volatile and
unpredictable catastrophe losses and prior accident year loss development. A reconciliation of the
combined ratio to the combined ratio before catastrophes and prior year development is provided in
the table below.
11
THREE MONTHS ENDED | ||||||||
June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||
P&C Commercial |
||||||||
Combined ratio |
105.8 | % | 89.6 | % | ||||
Less: Prior year reserve development |
2.1 | % | (9.9 | )% | ||||
Less: Current year catastrophe losses |
11.0 | % | 5.9 | % | ||||
Combined Ratio before prior year development & catastrophes |
92.8 | % | 93.6 | % | ||||
Consumer Markets |
||||||||
Combined ratio |
121.5 | % | 106.9 | % | ||||
Less: Prior year reserve development |
| (0.9 | )% | |||||
Less: Current year catastrophe losses |
29.9 | % | 14.6 | % | ||||
Combined Ratio before prior year development & catastrophes |
91.6 | % | 93.2 | % |
Core Earnings: The Hartford uses the non-GAAP financial measure core earnings as a
measure of the companys operating performance. The Hartford believes that the measure core
earnings provides investors with a measure of the performance of the companys ongoing businesses
because it reveals trends in the companys insurance and financial services businesses before the
net effect of certain realized capital gains and losses and discontinued operations. Some realized
capital gains and losses are primarily driven by investment decisions and external economic
developments, the nature and timing of which are unrelated to the insurance and underwriting
activities of the companys business.
Accordingly, core earnings excludes the effect of all realized gains and losses (net of tax and the
effects of deferred policy acquisition costs) that tend to be highly variable from period to period
based on capital market conditions. The Hartford believes, however, that some realized capital
gains and losses are integrally related to the companys insurance operations, so core earnings
includes certain net realized gains and losses such as net periodic settlements on credit
derivatives and net periodic settlements on the Japan fixed annuity cross currency swap. These net
realized gains and losses are directly related to an offsetting item included in the statement of
operations such as net investment income (loss). Net income is the most directly comparable GAAP
measure. Core earnings should not be considered as a substitute for net income and does not reflect
the overall profitability of the companys business. Therefore, The Hartford believes that it is
useful for investors to evaluate both net income and core earnings when reviewing the companys
performance. A reconciliation of core earnings to net income as of June 30, 2011, and June 30,
2010, is included in this press release.
Core earnings available to common shareholders per diluted share: Core earnings available
to common shareholders per diluted share is calculated based on the non-GAAP financial measure core
earnings. The Hartford believes that the measure core earnings per diluted common share provides
investors with a valuable measure of the companys operating performance for many of the same
reasons applicable to its underlying measure, core earnings. Net income per diluted common share is
the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Core earnings available to common shareholders per
diluted share should not be considered as a substitute for net income per diluted common share and
does not reflect the overall profitability of the companys business.
12
Therefore, The Hartford believes that it is useful for investors to evaluate both net income
per diluted common share and core earnings available to common shareholders per diluted share when
reviewing the companys performance. A reconciliation of core earnings available to common
shareholders per diluted share to net income per diluted common share as of June 30, 2011 and June
30, 2010 is included in this press release under the heading The Hartford Financial Services
Group, Inc. Results By Segment.
Core earnings return on assets (ROA): Core earnings ROA is a non-GAAP financial measure
that the company uses for certain segments in its Wealth Management Division to evaluate, and
believes is an important measure of, operating performance. Core earnings ROA excludes (i) the net
realized gains (losses), net of tax and DAC, excluded from core earnings, and (ii) the effect of
discontinued operations. ROA is the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure. The Hartford
believes that the measure core earnings ROA provides investors with a measure of the performance of
the companys on-going businesses because it reveals trends in businesses that may be obscured by
the effect of including net realized gains (losses), net of tax and DAC, excluded from core
earnings, and the effect of including discontinued operations. Some realized capital gains and
losses are primarily driven by investment decisions and external economic developments, the nature
and timing of which are unrelated to insurance aspects of the companys business. Management
believes, however, that some realized capital gains and losses are integrally related to the
companys insurance operations, and core earnings ROA should not be considered a substitute for ROA
and does not reflect the overall profitability of the companys businesses. Therefore, the company
believes it is important for investors to evaluate both core earnings ROA and ROA when reviewing
the companys performance. A reconciliation of core earnings ROA to ROA as of June 30, 2011, and
June 30, 2010, is set forth below.
THREE MONTHS ENDED | ||||||||
June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||
(in basis points) | ||||||||
Global Annuity |
||||||||
Net Income (loss) ROA |
61.3 | (30.3 | ) | |||||
Less: Net realized gains (losses) and other, net of tax and DAC excl.
from core earnings |
5.1 | (27.9 | ) | |||||
Core Earnings (losses) ROA |
56.2 | (2.4 | ) | |||||
Retirement Plans |
||||||||
Net Income ROA |
21.6 | 12.4 | ||||||
Less: Net realized gains and other, net of tax and DAC excl.
from core earnings |
10.1 | 3.5 | ||||||
Core Earnings ROA |
11.5 | 8.9 | ||||||
Mutual Funds |
||||||||
Net Income ROA |
10.6 | 9.9 | ||||||
Less: Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
| (0.4 | ) | |||||
Less: Net realized gains and other, net of tax and DAC excl.
from core earnings |
| 0.2 | ||||||
Core Earnings ROA |
10.6 | 10.1 |
13
Underwriting results: The Hartfords management evaluates profitability of the P&C
Commercial and Consumer Markets segments primarily on the basis of underwriting results.
Underwriting results is a before-tax measure that represents earned premiums less incurred losses,
loss adjustment expenses and underwriting expenses. Net income (loss) is the most directly
comparable GAAP measure. Underwriting results are influenced significantly by earned premium growth
and the adequacy of The Hartfords pricing. Underwriting profitability over time is also greatly
influenced by The Hartfords underwriting discipline, as management strives to manage exposure to
loss through favorable risk selection and diversification, effective management of claims, use of
reinsurance and its ability to manage its expenses. The Hartford believes that the measure
underwriting results provides investors with a valuable measure of before-tax profitability derived
from underwriting activities, which are managed separately from the companys investing activities.
A reconciliation of underwriting results to net income (loss) as of June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010
is set forth below.
THREE MONTHS ENDED | ||||||||
June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||
P&C Commercial |
||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 121 | 270 | |||||
Less: Income (loss) from discontinues operations, net of tax |
(3 | ) | 3 | |||||
Less: Net realized capital gains, after-tax |
25 | 11 | ||||||
Less: Income tax expense |
(16 | ) | (101 | ) | ||||
Less: Other expenses |
(35 | ) | (34 | ) | ||||
Less: Net investment income |
239 | 245 | ||||||
Underwriting Results |
$ | (89 | ) | $ | 146 | |||
Consumer Markets |
||||||||
Net Loss |
$ | (174 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | ||
Less: Net realized capital gains, after-tax |
5 | 2 | ||||||
Less: Income tax expense |
102 | 15 | ||||||
Less: Other expenses |
(129 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
Less: Net investment income |
49 | 49 | ||||||
Underwriting Results |
$ | (201 | ) | $ | (68 | ) | ||
14
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT
Some of the statements in this release should be considered forward-looking statements as defined
in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements can be
identified by words such as anticipates, intends, plans, seeks, believes, estimates,
expects, projects and similar references to the future. Examples of forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, statements the company makes regarding future results of
operations. The Hartford cautions investors that these forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future performance, and actual results may differ materially. Investors should
consider the important risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ. These
important risks and uncertainties include: challenges related to the companys current operating
environment, including continuing uncertainty about the strength and speed of the recovery in the
United States and other key economies and the impact of governmental stimulus and austerity
initiatives, sovereign credit concerns, including the potential consequences associated with
downgrades to the credit ratings of debt issue by the United States government, and other
developments on financial, commodity and credit markets and consumer spending and investment; the
success of initiatives relating to the realignment of The Hartfords business in 2010 and plans to
improve the profitability and long-term growth prospects of its key divisions, including through
acquisitions or divestitures, and the impact of regulatory or other constraints on the companys
ability to complete these initiatives and deploy capital among businesses as and when planned;
market risks associated with business, including changes in interest rates, credit spreads, equity
prices, foreign exchange rates, and implied volatility levels, as well as continuing uncertainty in
key sectors such as the global real estate market; volatility in earnings resulting from adjustment
of risk management program to emphasize protection of statutory surplus and cash flows; the impact
on statutory capital of various factors, including many that are outside the companys control,
which can in turn affect the companys and its subsidiaries credit and financial strength ratings,
cost of capital, regulatory compliance and other aspects of its business and results; risks to the
companys business, financial position, prospects and results associated with negative rating
actions or downgrades in the companys financial strength and credit ratings or negative rating
actions or downgrades relating to its investments; the potential for differing interpretations of
the methodologies, estimations and assumptions that underlie the valuation of the companys
financial instruments that could result in changes to investment valuations; the subjective
determinations that underlie the companys evaluation of other-than-temporary impairments on
available-for-sale securities; losses due to nonperformance or defaults by others; the potential
for further acceleration of deferred policy acquisition cost amortization; the potential for
further impairments of goodwill or the potential for changes in valuation allowances against
deferred tax assets; the possible occurrence of terrorist attacks and the companys ability to
contain its exposure, including the effect of the absence or insufficiency of applicable terrorism
legislation on coverage; the difficulty in predicting the companys potential exposure for asbestos
and environmental claims; the possibility of a pandemic, earthquake, or other natural or man-made
disaster that may adversely affect the companys businesses and cost and availability of
reinsurance; weather and other natural physical events, including the severity and frequency of
storms, hail, winter storms,
hurricanes and tropical storms, as well as climate change and its
potential impact on weather patterns; the response of reinsurance companies under reinsurance
contracts and the availability, pricing and adequacy of reinsurance to protect the company against
losses; the possibility of unfavorable loss development; actions by competitors, many of which are
larger or have
15
greater financial resources than the company; the restrictions, oversight, costs and other
consequences of being a savings and loan holding company, including from the supervision,
regulation and examination by The Federal Reserve as the companys regulator and the Office of the
Controller of the Currency as regulator of Federal Trust Bank; the cost and other effects of
increased regulation as a result of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act), which will, among other effects, vest a newly
created Financial Services Oversight Council with the power to designate systemically important
institutions, require central clearing of, and/or impose new margin and capital requirements on,
derivatives transactions, and may affect the companys ability as a savings and loan holding
company to manage its general account by limiting or eliminating investments in certain private
equity and hedge funds; the potential effect of other domestic and foreign regulatory developments,
including those that could adversely impact the demand for the companys products, operating costs
and required capital levels, including changes to statutory reserves and/or risk-based capital
requirements related to secondary guarantees under universal life and variable annuity products or
changes in U.S. federal or other tax laws that affect the relative attractiveness of our investment
products; the companys ability to distribute its products through distribution channels, both
current and future; the uncertain effects of emerging claim and coverage issues; regulatory
limitations on the ability of the company and certain of its subsidiaries to declare and pay
dividends; the companys ability to effectively price its property and casualty policies, including
its ability to obtain regulatory consents to pricing actions or to non-renewal or withdrawal of
certain product lines; the companys ability to maintain the availability of its systems and
safeguard the security of its data in the event of a disaster or other unanticipated events; the
risk that the companys framework for managing business risks may not be effective in mitigating
material risk and loss; the potential for difficulties arising from outsourcing relationships; the
impact of potential changes in federal or state tax laws, including changes affecting the
availability of the separate account dividends received deduction; the impact of potential changes
in accounting principles and related financial reporting requirements; the companys ability to
protect its intellectual property and defend against claims of infringement; unfavorable judicial
or legislative developments; and other factors described in The Hartfords Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q, the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K and other filings The Hartford makes with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Any forward-looking statement made by the company in this release speaks only as of the date of
this release. Factors or events that could cause the companys actual results to differ may emerge
from time to time, and it is not possible for the company to predict all of them. The company
undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of
new information, future developments or otherwise.
###
16