Federal-Mogul Holdings LLC - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Federal-Mogul Holdings LLC	Financial_Report.xls
EX-32 - CERTIFICATION BY THE COMPANY'S CEO AND CFO - Federal-Mogul Holdings LLC	dex32.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION BY THE COMPANY'S CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - Federal-Mogul Holdings LLC	dex311.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION BY THE COMPANY'S CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER - Federal-Mogul Holdings LLC	dex312.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

[ ]

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-34029

FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		20-8350090
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS employer identification number)


26555 Northwestern Highway, Southfield, Michigan		48033
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(248) 354-7700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer [ ]		Accelerated filer [ X ]		Non-accelerated filer [ ]		Smaller Reporting Company [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes [ X ] No [ ]

As of July 27, 2011, there were 98,904,500 outstanding shares of the registrant’s $0.01 par value common stock.

FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION

Form 10-Q

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

INDEX


	Page No.
Part I – Financial Information
Item 1 – Financial Statements		3
Consolidated Statements of Operations		3
Consolidated Balance Sheets		4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		6
Forward-Looking Statements		29
Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		29
Item 3 – Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk		46
Item 4 – Controls and Procedures		46
Part II – Other Information
Item 1 – Legal Proceedings		48
Item 4 – Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		48
Item 6 – Exhibits		49
Signatures		50
Exhibits		51

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts)
Net sales	$	1,800		$	1,598		$	3,524		$	3,087
Cost of products sold		(1,501	)		(1,324	)		(2,946	)		(2,559	)


Gross margin		299			274			578			528

Selling, general and administrative expenses		(173	)		(169	)		(350	)		(353	)
OPEB curtailment gain		—			4			—			4
Interest expense, net		(32	)		(32	)		(63	)		(65	)
Amortization expense		(12	)		(12	)		(24	)		(24	)
Equity earnings of non-consolidated affiliates		10			10			20			17
Restructuring expense, net		—			(5	)		(1	)		(6	)
Other expense, net		(10	)		(2	)		(11	)		(23	)


Income before income taxes		82			68			149			78
Income tax expense		(17	)		(18	)		(31	)		(11	)


Net income		65			50			118			67
Less net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(1	)		(1	)		(3	)		(4	)


Net income attributable to Federal-Mogul	$	64		$	49		$	115		$	63


Income per common share:
Basic	$	0.65		$	0.50		$	1.16		$	0.64

Diluted	$	0.64		$	0.49		$	1.15		$	0.63

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION

Consolidated Balance Sheets


	(Unaudited) June 30 2011			December 31 2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and equivalents	$	1,042		$	1,105
Accounts receivable, net		1,217			1,075
Inventories, net		1,022			847
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		246			244

Total current assets		3,527			3,271

Property, plant and equipment, net		1,933			1,802
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets		1,426			1,431
Definite-lived intangible assets, net		460			484
Investments in non-consolidated affiliates		243			210
Other noncurrent assets		107			98


	$	7,696		$	7,296


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Short-term debt, including current portion of long-term debt	$	84		$	73
Accounts payable		819			660
Accrued liabilities		407			428
Current portion of postemployment benefit liability		48			47
Other current liabilities		148			143

Total current liabilities		1,506			1,351

Long-term debt		2,747			2,752
Postemployment benefits		1,182			1,172
Long-term portion of deferred income taxes		475			470
Other accrued liabilities		182			186

Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock ($.01 par value; 90,000,000 authorized shares; none issued)		—			—
Common stock ($.01 par value; 450,100,000 authorized shares; 100,500,000 issued shares; 98,904,500 outstanding shares as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010)		1			1
Additional paid-in capital, including warrants		2,150			2,150
Accumulated deficit		(237	)		(352	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(397	)		(505	)
Treasury stock, at cost		(17	)		(17	)

Total Federal-Mogul shareholders’ equity		1,500			1,277

Noncontrolling interests		104			88

Total shareholders’ equity		1,604			1,365


	$	7,696		$	7,296

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended June 30
	2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Cash Provided From (Used By) Operating Activities
Net income	$	118		$	67
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided from (used by) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		139			162
Restructuring expense, net		1			6
Payments against restructuring liabilities		(14	)		(20	)
Payments to settle non-debt liabilities subject to compromise, net		(1	)		(16	)
Equity earnings of non-consolidated affiliates		(20	)		(17	)
Cash dividends received from non-consolidated affiliates		—			24
Change in postemployment benefits, including pensions		(11	)		4
Loss on Venezuelan currency devaluation		—			20
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment		—			(2	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(113	)		(212	)
Inventories		(148	)		(21	)
Accounts payable		141			122
Other assets and liabilities		(2	)		60

Net Cash Provided From Operating Activities		90			177

Cash Provided From (Used By) Investing Activities
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment		(177	)		(98	)
Payments to acquire business		—			(39	)
Net proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment		—			2

Net Cash Used By Investing Activities		(177	)		(135	)

Cash Provided From (Used By) Financing Activities
Principal payments on term loans		(15	)		(15	)
Decrease in other long-term debt		(2	)		(2	)
Increase in short-term debt		11			5
Net proceeds (remittances) on servicing of factoring arrangements		5			(12	)

Net Cash Used By Financing Activities		(1	)		(24	)

Effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on cash		25			(16	)
Effect of Venezuelan currency devaluation on cash		—			(16	)

Effect of foreign currency fluctuations on cash		25			(32	)

Decrease in cash and equivalents		(63	)		(14	)

Cash and equivalents at beginning of period		1,105			1,034


Cash and equivalents at end of period	$	1,042		$	1,020

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

June 30, 2011

1.	BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Interim Financial Statements: The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Federal-Mogul Corporation (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) that management believes are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations, financial position and cash flows. The Company’s management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading when read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Principles of Consolidation: The Company consolidates into its financial statements the accounts of the Company, all wholly-owned subsidiaries, and any partially-owned subsidiary that the Company has the ability to control. Control generally equates to ownership percentage, whereby investments that are more than 50% owned are consolidated, investments in affiliates of 50% or less but greater than 20% are accounted for using the equity method, and investments in affiliates of 20% or less are accounted for using the cost method. The Company does not consolidate any entity for which it has a variable interest based solely on power to direct the activities and significant participation in the entity’s expected results that would not otherwise be consolidated based on control through voting interests. Further, the Company’s joint ventures are businesses established and maintained in connection with its operating strategy. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported therein. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be based upon amounts that differ from these estimates.

Controlling Ownership: Mr. Carl C. Icahn indirectly controls approximately 76% of the voting power of the Company’s capital stock and, by virtue of such stock ownership, is able to control or exert substantial influence over the Company, including the election of directors, business strategy and policies, mergers or other business combinations, acquisition or disposition of assets, future issuances of common stock or other securities, incurrence of debt or obtaining other sources of financing, and the payment of dividends on the Company’s common stock. The existence of a controlling stockholder may have the effect of making it difficult for, or may discourage or delay, a third party from seeking to acquire a majority of the Company’s outstanding common stock, which may adversely affect the market price of the stock.

Mr. Icahn’s interests may not always be consistent with the Company’s interests or with the interests of the Company’s other stockholders. Mr. Icahn and entities controlled by him may also pursue acquisitions or business opportunities that may or may not be complementary to the Company’s business. To the extent that conflicts of interest may arise between the Company and Mr. Icahn and his affiliates, those conflicts may be resolved in a manner adverse to the Company or its other shareholders.

Acquisition: In June 2010, the Company acquired 100% ownership of the Daros Group, a privately-owned supplier of high technology piston rings for large-bore engines used in industrial energy generation and commercial shipping, with manufacturing operations in China, Germany and Sweden, for $39 million in cash. The Company allocated the purchase price in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codifications (“ASC”) Topic 805, Business Combinations. The Company utilized a third party to assist in the fair value determination of certain components of the purchase price allocation, namely fixed assets and intangible assets. This acquisition is included in the Powertrain Energy reporting segment.

Factoring of Trade Accounts Receivable: Federal-Mogul subsidiaries in Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain and the United States are party to accounts receivable factoring and securitization facilities. Gross accounts receivable transferred under these facilities were $336 million and $211 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Of those gross amounts, $334 million and $210 million, respectively, qualify as sales as defined in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. The remaining transferred receivables were pledged as collateral and accounted for as secured borrowings and recorded in the consolidated balance sheets within “Accounts receivable, net” and “Short-term debt, including current portion of long-term debt.” Under the terms of these facilities, the Company is not obligated to draw cash immediately upon the transfer of accounts receivable. Thus, as of both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding transferred receivables for which cash of $1 million had not yet been drawn. Proceeds from the transfers of accounts receivable qualifying as sales were $923 million and $629 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, expenses associated with transfers of receivables were $3 million and $5 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, such expenses were $1 million and $2 million, respectively. These expenses were recorded in the consolidated statements of operations within “Other expense, net.”

Where the Company receives a fee to service and monitor these transferred receivables, such fees are sufficient to offset the costs and as such, a servicing asset or liability is not incurred as a result of such activities.

Certain of the facilities contain terms that require the Company to share in the credit risk of the sold receivables. The maximum exposures to the Company associated with these certain facilities’ terms were $34 million and $32 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The fair values of the exposures to the Company associated with these certain facilities’ terms were determined to be immaterial.

Equity and Comprehensive Income: The following table presents a rollforward of the changes in equity for the six months ended June 30, 2011, including changes in the components of comprehensive income (also contained in Note 14). In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 810, Consolidation, amounts attributable to the Company’s shareholders and to the noncontrolling interests are as follows:


	Total			Federal- Mogul Shareholders’ Equity			Non- Controlling Interests
	(Millions of Dollars)
Equity balance as of December 31, 2010	$	1,365		$	1,277		$	88
Comprehensive income:
Net income		118			115			3
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other		110			107			3
Hedge instruments, net of tax		(3	)		(3	)		—
Postemployment benefits, net of tax		4			4			—

		229			223			6

Capital investment in subsidiary by non-controlling shareholder		10			—			10

Equity balance as of June 30, 2011	$	1,604		$	1,500		$	104

New Accounting Pronouncements: In April 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. This ASU provides guidance on whether a creditor has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties for purposes of determining whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The Company does not expect the provisions of this ASU to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This ASU makes changes to fair value principles related to premiums and discounts and the measurement of financial instruments, requires new disclosures with a focus on level 3 measurements and makes clarifications regarding the definition of a principal market. The Company does not expect the provisions of this ASU to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This ASU will change the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements. The Company will adopt this new guidance effective January 1, 2012.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This ASU requires additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements, including the amount and reasons for transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy and more detailed information regarding the inputs and valuation techniques used in determining the fair value of assets and liabilities classified as either Level 2 or Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. In addition, this ASU clarifies previous guidance related to the level at which fair value disclosures should be disaggregated. The adoption of these components of this new guidance was effective January 1, 2010. This ASU further requires entities to report Level 3 rollforward activity on a gross basis effective January 1, 2011. These additional disclosure requirements, to the extent applicable, have been reflected in Note 5.

2.	RESTRUCTURING

Restructuring activities are undertaken as necessary to execute management’s strategy and streamline operations, consolidate and take advantage of available capacity and resources, and ultimately achieve net cost reductions. Restructuring activities include efforts to integrate and rationalize the Company’s businesses and to relocate manufacturing operations to best cost markets.

The costs contained within “Restructuring expense, net” in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations are comprised of two types: employee costs (principally termination benefits) and facility closure costs. Termination benefits are accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 712, Compensation – Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits, and are recorded when it is probable that employees will be entitled to benefits and the amounts can be reasonably estimated. Estimates of termination benefits are based on the frequency of past termination benefits, the similarity of benefits under the current plan and prior plans, and the existence of statutory required minimum benefits. Facility closure and other costs are accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations, and are recorded when the liability is incurred.

Estimates of restructuring charges are based on information available at the time such charges are recorded. In certain countries where the Company operates, statutory requirements include involuntary termination benefits that extend several years into the future. Accordingly, severance payments continue well past the date of termination at many non-U.S. locations. Thus, restructuring programs appear to be ongoing when, in fact, terminations and other activities have been substantially completed.

Management expects to finance its restructuring programs through cash generated from its ongoing operations or through cash available under its existing credit facility, subject to the terms of applicable covenants. Management does not expect that the execution of these programs will have an adverse impact on its liquidity position.

The following table provides a summary of the Company’s consolidated restructuring liabilities and related activity as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 by reporting segment. “PTE,” “PTSB,” “VSP,” and “GA” represent the Powertrain Energy, Powertrain Sealing and Bearings, Vehicle Safety and Protection, and Global Aftermarket reporting segments, respectively.


	PTE			PTSB			VSP			GA			Corporate			Total
	(Millions of Dollars)
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	11		$	7		$	1		$	3		$	2		$	24
Provisions		—			1			—			1			—			2
Reversals		—			—			—			(1	)		—			(1	)
Payments		(1	)		(2	)		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)		(6	)

Balance at March 31, 2011		10			6			—			2			1			19
Provisions		2			1			—			—			—			3
Reversals		(3	)		—			—			—			—			(3	)
Payments		(5	)		(2	)		—			(1	)		—			(8	)

Balance at June 30, 2011	$	4		$	5		$	—		$	1		$	1		$	11

The following table provides a summary of the Company’s consolidated restructuring liabilities and related activity for each type of exit cost as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. As the table indicates, facility closure costs are typically paid within the quarter of incurrence.


	Employee Costs			Facility Costs			Total
	(Millions of Dollars)
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	24		$	—		$	24
Provisions		1			1			2
Reversals		(1	)		—			(1	)
Payments		(5	)		(1	)		(6	)

Balance at March 31, 2011		19			—			19
Provisions		1			2			3
Reversals		(3	)		—			(3	)
Payments		(6	)		(2	)		(8	)

Balance at June 30, 2011	$	11		$	—		$	11

Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in estimating restructuring expenses, actual amounts paid for such activities may differ from amounts initially estimated. Accordingly, previously recorded liabilities of $3 million and $4 million were reversed during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Such reversals result from: changes in estimated amounts to accomplish previously planned activities; changes in expected (based on historical practice) outcome of negotiations with labor unions, which reduced the level of originally committed actions; newly implemented government employment programs, which lowered the expected cost; and changes in approach to accomplish restructuring activities.

Activities under Global “Restructuring 2009” Program

An unprecedented downturn in the global automotive industry and global financial markets led the Company to announce, in September and December 2008, certain restructuring actions, herein referred to as “Restructuring 2009,” designed to improve operating performance and respond to increasingly challenging conditions in the global automotive market.

The following table provides a summary of the Company’s Restructuring 2009 liabilities and related activity as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 by reporting segment:


	PTE			PTSB			VSP			GA			Corporate		Total
	(Millions of Dollars)
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	8		$	7		$	1		$	2		$	—	$	18
Provisions		—			1			—			—			—		1
Reversals		—			—			—			(1	)		—		(1	)
Payments		(1	)		(2	)		(1	)		—			—		(4	)

Balance at March 31, 2011		7			6			—			1			—		14
Provisions		1			1			—			—			—		2
Reversals		(3	)		—			—			—			—		(3	)
Payments		(3	)		(2	)		—			(1	)		—		(6	)

Balance at June 30, 2011	$	2		$	5		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	7

The following table provides a summary of the Company’s Restructuring 2009 liabilities and related activity for each type of exit cost as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. As the table indicates, facility closure costs are typically paid within the quarter of incurrence.


	Employee Costs			Facility Costs			Total
	(Millions of Dollars)
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	18		$	—		$	18
Provisions		1			—			1
Reversals		(1	)		—			(1	)
Payments		(4	)		—			(4	)

Balance at March 31, 2011		14			—			14
Provisions		1			1			2
Reversals		(3	)		—			(3	)
Payments		(5	)		(1	)		(6	)

Balance at June 30, 2011	$	7		$	—		$	7

The Company has incurred total expenses of $156 million since the inception of this program, of which $148 million were employee costs and $8 million were facility closure costs. The Company expects to incur additional restructuring expenses up to $2 million through the remainder of 2011, all of which are expected to be facility closure costs. Net charges related to Restructuring 2009 are as follows:


	Total Incurred Costs		Estimated Additional Charges
	(Millions of Dollars)
Powertrain Energy	$	45	$	2
Powertrain Sealing and Bearings		60		—
Vehicle Safety and Protection		34		—
Global Aftermarket		11		—
Corporate		6		—

	$	156	$	2

Other Restructuring Activities

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded $1 million and $2 million, respectively, in net restructuring expenses outside of Restructuring 2009, all of which were facility closure costs.

3.	OTHER EXPENSE, NET

The specific components of “Other expense, net” are as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Foreign currency exchange	$	(5	)	$	2		$	(6	)	$	(22	)
Accounts receivable discount expense		(3	)		(1	)		(5	)		(2	)
Adjustment of assets to fair value		(3	)		(4	)		(3	)		(8	)
Other		1			1			3			9

	$	(10	)	$	(2	)	$	(11	)	$	(23	)

Foreign currency exchange: The Company recognized $5 million and $6 million in foreign currency exchange losses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. This was due to unfavorable foreign currency volatility in regions where the transactional currency differs from the functional currency.

The Company recognized $2 million and $(22) million in foreign currency exchange gains (losses) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. The Company has operated an aftermarket distribution center in Venezuela for several years, supplying imported replacement automotive parts to the local independent aftermarket. Since 2005, two exchange rates have existed in Venezuela: the official rate, which had been frozen since 2005 at 2.15 bolivars per U.S. dollar; and the parallel rate, which floats at a rate much higher than the official rate. Given the existence of the two rates in Venezuela, the Company deemed the official rate was appropriate for the purpose of conversion into U.S. dollars at December 31, 2009 based on no positive intent to repatriate cash at the parallel rate and demonstrated ability to repatriate cash at the official rate.

Near the end of 2009, the three year cumulative inflation rate for Venezuela was above 100%, which requires the Venezuelan operation to report its results as though the U.S. dollar is its functional currency in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 830, Foreign Currency Matters, commencing January 1, 2010 (“inflationary accounting”). The impact of this transition to a U.S. dollar functional currency requires any change in the U.S. dollar value of bolivar denominated monetary assets and liabilities to be recognized directly in earnings.

On January 8, 2010, the Venezuelan government devalued its currency. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded $20 million in foreign currency exchange expense due to this currency devaluation.

The remaining Venezuelan cash balance of $13 million as of June 30, 2011 is expected to be used to pay intercompany balances for the purchase of product and to pay dividends, subject to local government restrictions.

Adjustment of assets to fair value: The Company recorded $3 million in impairment charges during the second quarter of 2011, of which $2 million related to the establishment of an asset retirement obligation (see Note 5) for a Powertrain Energy facility that is closed. As the fair value of the facility did not support the capitalization of this asset retirement obligation, it was impaired. The remaining $1 million in impairment charges recorded during the second quarter of 2011 was made up of immaterial fixed assets impairments at several Company facilities.

The Company recorded $4 million in impairment charges during the second quarter of 2010, of which $3 million related to the identification of a Powertrain Energy facility where the Company’s assessment of future undiscounted cash flows, when compared to the current carrying value of the plant and the equipment, indicated the assets were not fully recoverable. The Company determined the fair value of the assets by applying a probability weighted, expected present value technique to the estimated future cash flows using assumptions a market participant would utilize (level 3, income approach – see Note 5). The discount rate used is consistent with other long-lived asset fair value measurements. The carrying value of these assets exceeded the resulting fair value by $3 million and an impairment charge was recorded for that amount. The remaining $1 million in impairment charges recorded during the second quarter of 2010 was made up of immaterial fixed assets impairments at several Company facilities.

The Company recorded $4 million in impairment charges during the first quarter of 2010 related to the identification of equipment at a Vehicle Safety and Protection facility where the Company’s assessment of future undiscounted cash flows, when compared to the current carrying value of the equipment, indicated the assets were not recoverable. The Company determined the fair value of the assets by applying a probability weighted, expected present value technique to the estimated future cash flows using assumptions a market participant would utilize (level 3, income approach – see Note 5). The discount rate used is consistent with other long-lived asset fair value measurements. The carrying value of the assets exceeded the resulting fair value by $4 million and an impairment charge was recorded for that amount.

4.	FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Interest Rate Risk

The Company, during 2008, entered into a series of five-year interest rate swap agreements with a total notional value of $1,190 million to hedge the variability of interest payments associated with its variable-rate term loans. Through these swap agreements, the Company has fixed its base interest and premium rate at a combined average interest rate of approximately 5.37% on the hedged principal amount of $1,190 million. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, unrealized net losses of $61 million and $70 million, respectively, were recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” as a result of these hedges. As of June 30, 2011, losses of $37 million are expected to be reclassified from “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” to consolidated statement of operations within the next 12 months.

These interest rate swaps reduce the Company’s overall interest rate risk. However, due to the remaining outstanding borrowings on the Company’s term loans and other borrowing facilities that continue to have variable interest rates, management believes that interest rate risk to the Company could be material if there are significant adverse changes in interest rates.

Commodity Price Risk

The Company’s production processes are dependent upon the supply of certain raw materials that are exposed to price fluctuations on the open market. The primary purpose of the Company’s commodity price forward contract activity is to manage the volatility associated with forecasted purchases. The Company monitors its commodity price risk exposures regularly to maximize the overall effectiveness of its commodity forward contracts. Principal raw materials hedged include high-grade aluminum, copper, natural gas, nickel, tin and zinc. Forward contracts are used to mitigate commodity price risk associated with raw materials, generally related to purchases forecast for up to fifteen months in the future.

The Company had commodity price hedge contracts outstanding with combined notional values of $98 million and $50 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, of which substantially all mature within one year and substantially all were designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes. Unrealized net gains of $12 million were recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” as of December, 31, 2010. Immaterial unrealized net gains were recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” as of June 30, 2011.

Foreign Currency Risk

The Company manufactures and sells its products in North America, South America, Asia, Europe and Africa. As a result, the Company’s financial results could be significantly affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets in which the Company manufactures and sells its products. The Company’s operating results are primarily exposed to changes in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and European currencies.

The Company generally tries to use natural hedges within its foreign currency activities, including the matching of revenues and costs, to minimize foreign currency risk. Where natural hedges are not in place, the Company considers managing certain aspects of its foreign currency activities and larger transactions through the use of foreign currency options or forward contracts. Principal currencies hedged have historically included the euro, British pound and Polish zloty. The Company had notional values of $27 million and $20 million of foreign currency hedge contracts outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, of which substantially all mature in less than one year and substantially all were designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes. Unrealized net losses of $1 million were recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” as of June 30, 2011. Immaterial unrealized net losses were recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” as of December 31, 2010.

Other

The Company presents its derivative positions and any related material collateral under master netting agreements on a net basis. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, changes in the time value are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Unrealized gains and losses associated with ineffective hedges, determined using the hypothetical derivative method, are recognized in “Other expense, net.” Derivative gains and losses included in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” for effective hedges are reclassified into operations upon recognition of the hedged transaction. Derivative gains and losses associated with undesignated hedges are recognized in “Other expense, net” for outstanding hedges and “Cost of products sold” upon hedge maturity. The Company’s undesignated hedges are primarily commodity hedges and such hedges have become undesignated mainly due to forecasted volume declines.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of accounts receivable and cash investments. The Company’s customer base includes virtually every significant global light and commercial vehicle manufacturer and a large number of distributors, installers and retailers of automotive aftermarket parts. The Company’s credit evaluation process and the geographical dispersion of sales transactions help to mitigate credit risk concentration. No individual customer accounted for more than 5% of the Company’s direct sales during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The Company requires placement of cash in financial institutions evaluated as highly creditworthy.

The following table discloses the fair values and balance sheet locations of the Company’s derivative instruments:


	Asset Derivatives					Liability Derivatives
	Balance Sheet Location	June 30 2011		December 31 2010		Balance Sheet Location	June 30 2011			December 31 2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments:
Interest rate swap contracts		$	—	$	—	Other current liabilities	$	(37	)	$	(37	)
						Other noncurrent liabilities		(24	)		(33	)
Commodity contracts	Other current assets		4		13	Other current assets		(4	)		(1	)
Foreign currency contracts			—		—	Other current liabilities		(1	)		—

		$	4	$	13		$	(66	)	$	(71	)

The following table discloses the effect of the Company’s derivative instruments on the consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011:


Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments	Amount of Loss Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion)			Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion)			Location of Loss Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)	Amount of Loss Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
	(Millions of Dollars)

Interest rate swap contracts	$	(9	)	Interest expense, net	$	(9	)		$	—

Commodity contracts		(6	)	Cost of products sold		2		Other expense, net		(1	)

Foreign currency contracts		(1	)	Cost of products sold		(1	)			—

	$	(16	)		$	(8	)		$	(1	)

The following table discloses the effect of the Company’s derivative instruments on the consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2010:


Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion)			Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion)			Location of Loss Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)	Amount of Loss Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
	(Millions of Dollars)

Interest rate swap contracts	$	(21	)	Interest expense, net	$	(9	)		$	—

Commodity contracts		(5	)	Cost of products sold		1		Other expense, net		(1	)

Foreign currency contracts		2				—				—

	$	(24	)		$	(8	)		$	(1	)

The following table discloses the effect of the Company’s derivative instruments on the consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011:


Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments	Amount of Loss Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion)			Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion)			Location of Loss Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)	Amount of Loss Recognized in Income on Derivatives (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
	(Millions of Dollars)
Interest rate swap contracts	$	(10	)	Interest expense, net	$	(19	)		$	—

Commodity contracts		(5	)	Cost of products sold		6		Other expense, net		(1	)

Foreign currency contracts		(2	)	Cost of products sold		(1	)			—

	$	(17	)		$	(14	)		$	(1	)

The following tables disclose the effect of the Company’s derivative instruments on the consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010:


Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion)			Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion)
	(Millions of Dollars)
Interest rate swap contracts	$	(43	)	Interest expense, net	$	(19	)

Commodity contracts		(2	)	Cost of products sold		3

Foreign currency contracts		3		Cost of products sold		1

	$	(42	)		$	(15	)


Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
	(Millions of Dollars)
Commodity contracts	Cost of products sold	$	1

Commodity contracts	Other expense, net		(1	)

		$	—

5.	FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“FASB ASC 820”), clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based upon assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, FASB ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:


Level 1:		Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;


Level 2:		Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3:		Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

An asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are based on one or more of the following three valuation techniques noted in FASB ASC Topic 820:

Market approach: Prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.

Cost approach: Amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).

Income approach: Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based upon market expectations (including present value techniques, option-pricing and excess earnings models).

Assets and liabilities remeasured and disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are set forth in the table below:


	Asset (Liability)			Level 2			Valuation Technique
	(Millions of Dollars)
June 30, 2011:
Interest rate swap contracts	$	(61	)	$	(61	)	C
Foreign currency contracts		(1	)		(1	)	C

December 31, 2010:
Interest rate swap contracts	$	(70	)	$	(70	)	C
Commodity contracts		12			12		C

The Company calculates the fair value of its interest rate swap contracts, commodity contracts and foreign currency contracts using quoted interest rate curves, quoted commodity forward rates and quoted currency forward rates, respectively, to calculate forward values, and then discounts the forward values.

The discount rates for all derivative contracts are based on quoted swap interest rates or bank deposit rates. For contracts which, when aggregated by counterparty, are in a liability position, the rates are adjusted by the credit spread that market participants would apply if buying these contracts from the Company’s counterparties.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2011 are set forth in the table below:


	Asset (Liability)			Level 3			(Loss)			Valuation Technique
	(Millions of Dollars)
June 30, 2011:
Property, plant and equipment	$	6		$	6		$	(3	)	C
Asset retirement obligation		(2	)		(2	)		—		C

Property, plant and equipment with a carrying value of $9 million were written down to their fair value of $6 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $3 million, which was recorded within “Other expense, net” for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. The Company determined the fair value of these assets by applying probability weighted, expected present value techniques to the estimated future cash flows using assumptions a market participant would utilize. The discount rate used is consistent with the Company’s goodwill fair value measurements.

An asset retirement obligation of $2 million was recorded as of June 30, 2011. The fair value of this liability was determined with the assistance of an outside third party specialist.

6.	INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost was determined by the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Inventories are reduced by an allowance for excess and obsolete inventories based on management’s review of on-hand inventories compared to historical and estimated future sales and usage.

Net inventories consist of the following:


	June 30 2011			December 31 2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Raw materials	$	196		$	178
Work-in-process		158			131
Finished products		759			624

		1,113			933
Inventory valuation allowance		(91	)		(86	)

	$	1,022		$	847

7.	GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, goodwill and other intangible assets consist of the following:


	June 30, 2011							December 31, 2010
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
	(Millions of Dollars)
Definite-Lived Intangible Assets:
Customer relationships	$	543	$	(161	)	$	382	$	543	$	(143	)	$	400
Developed technology		115		(37	)		78		115		(31	)		84

	$	658	$	(198	)	$	460	$	658	$	(174	)	$	484


Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets:
Goodwill						$	1,112						$	1,117
Trademarks and brand names							314							314

						$	1,426						$	1,431

During each of the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded amortization expense of $12 million and $24 million, respectively, associated with definite-lived intangible assets. The Company utilizes the straight line method of amortization, recognized over the estimated useful lives of the assets.

The following is a rollforward of the Company’s goodwill and other intangible assets (net) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011:


	Goodwill			Other Indefinite- Lived Intangibles		Definite- Lived Intangibles (Net)
	(Millions of Dollars)
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	1,117		$	314	$	484
Tax adjustment		(6	)		—		—
Amortization expense		—			—		(12	)
Foreign currency		1			—		—

Balance at March 31, 2011		1,112			314		472
Amortization expense		—			—		(12	)

Balance at June 30, 2011	$	1,112		$	314	$	460

During the first quarter of 2011, the Company corrected $6 million of tax adjustments that were improperly recorded to goodwill.

8.	INVESTMENTS IN NON-CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

The Company maintains investments in several non-consolidated affiliates, which are located in China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Korea, Turkey and the United States. The Company’s direct ownership in such affiliates ranges from approximately 2% to 50%. The aggregate investments in these affiliates were $243 million and $210 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company does not hold a controlling interest in an entity based on exposure to economic risks and potential rewards (variable interests) for which it is the primary beneficiary. Further, the Company’s joint ventures are businesses established and maintained in connection with its operating strategy and are not special purpose entities.

The following table represents amounts reflected in the Company’s financial statements related to non-consolidated affiliates:


	Three Months Ended June 30				Six Months Ended June 30
	2011		2010		2011		2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Equity earnings of non-consolidated affiliates	$	10	$	10	$	20	$	17
Cash dividends received from non-consolidated affiliates		—		4		—		24

The following table presents selected aggregated financial information of the non-consolidated affiliates:


	Six Months Ended June 30
	2011		2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Net sales	$	375	$	304
Net income		49		41
Net assets		532		433

The Company holds a 50% non-controlling interest in a joint venture located in Turkey. This joint venture was established in 1995 for the purpose of manufacturing and marketing automotive parts, including pistons, piston rings, piston pins, and cylinder liners to original equipment and aftermarket customers. Pursuant to the joint venture agreement, the Company’s partner holds an option to put its shares to a subsidiary of the Company at the higher of the current fair value or at a guaranteed minimum amount. The term of the contingent guarantee is indefinite, consistent with the terms of the joint venture agreement. However, the contingent guarantee would not survive termination of the joint venture agreement. The guaranteed minimum amount represents a contingent guarantee of the initial investment of the joint venture partner and can be exercised at the discretion of the partner. As of June 30, 2011, the total amount of the contingent guarantee, were all triggering events to occur, approximated $65 million. The Company believes that this contingent guarantee is substantially less than the estimated current fair value of the guarantees’ interest in the affiliate. As such, the contingent guarantee does not give rise to a contingent liability and, as a result, no amount is recorded for this guarantee. If this put option were exercised, the consideration paid and net assets acquired would be accounted for in accordance with business combination accounting guidance. Any value in excess of the guaranteed minimum amount of the put option would be the subject of negotiation between the Company and its joint venture partner.

9.	ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:


	June 30 2011		December 31 2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Accrued compensation	$	203	$	190
Accrued rebates		98		123
Accrued income taxes		28		28
Non-income taxes payable		26		23
Accrued product returns		22		23
Accrued professional services		16		13
Restructuring liabilities		11		24
Accrued warranty		2		3
Other		1		1

	$	407	$	428

10.

DEBT

On December 27, 2007, the Company entered into a Term Loan and Revolving Credit Agreement (the “Debt Facilities”) with Citicorp U.S.A. Inc. as Administrative Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Syndication Agent and certain lenders. The Debt Facilities include a $540 million revolving credit facility (which is subject to a borrowing base and can be increased under certain circumstances and subject to certain conditions) and a $2,960 million term loan credit facility divided into a $1,960 million tranche B loan and a $1,000 million tranche C loan. The obligations under the revolving credit facility mature December 27, 2013 and bear interest for the first six months at LIBOR plus 1.75% or at the alternate base rate (“ABR,” defined as the greater of Citibank, N.A.’s announced prime rate or 0.50% over the Federal Funds Rate) plus 0.75%, and thereafter shall be adjusted in accordance with a pricing grid based on availability under the revolving credit facility. Interest rates on the pricing grid range from LIBOR plus 1.50% to LIBOR plus 2.00% and ABR plus 0.50% to ABR plus 1.00%. The tranche B term loans mature December 27, 2014 and the tranche C term loans mature December 27, 2015. The tranche C term loans are subject to a pre-payment premium, should the Company choose to prepay the loans prior to December 27, 2011. All Debt Facilities term loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.9375% or at the alternate base rate (as previously defined) plus 0.9375% at the Company’s election. To the extent that interest rates change by 25 basis points, the Company’s annual interest expense would show a corresponding change of approximately $4 million.

The Company, during 2008, entered into a series of five-year interest rate swap agreements with a total notional value of $1,190 million to hedge the variability of interest payments associated with its variable-rate term loans under the Debt Facilities. Through these swap agreements, the Company has fixed its base interest and premium rate at a combined average interest rate of approximately 5.37% on the hedged principal amount of $1,190 million. Since the interest rate swaps hedge the variability of interest payments on variable rate debt with the same terms, they qualify for cash flow hedge accounting treatment.

The Debt Facilities were initially negotiated and agreement was reached on the majority of significant terms in early 2007. Between the time the terms were agreed in early 2007 and December 27, 2007, interest rates charged on similar debt instruments for companies with similar debt ratings and capitalization levels rose to higher levels. As such, when applying the provisions of fresh-start reporting, the Company estimated a fair value adjustment of $163 million for the available borrowings under the Debt Facilities. This estimated fair value was recorded within the fresh-start reporting, and is being amortized as interest expense over the terms of each of the underlying components of the Debt Facilities. During each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized $5 million in interest expense associated with the amortization of this fair value adjustment. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized $12 million and $11 million, respectively, in interest expense associated with the amortization of this fair value adjustment.

Debt consists of the following:


	June 30 2011			December 31 2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Debt Facilities:
Revolver	$	—		$	—
Tranche B term loan		1,891			1,901
Tranche C term loan		965			970
Debt discount		(85	)		(97	)
Other debt, primarily foreign instruments		60			51

		2,831			2,825
Less: short-term debt, including current maturities of long-term debt		(84	)		(73	)

Total long-term debt	$	2,747		$	2,752

The obligations of the Company under the Debt Facilities are guaranteed by substantially all of the domestic subsidiaries and certain foreign subsidiaries of the Company, and are secured by substantially all personal property and certain real property of the Company and such guarantors, subject to certain limitations. The liens granted to secure these obligations and certain cash management and hedging obligations have first priority.

The Debt Facilities contain certain affirmative and negative covenants and events of default, including, subject to certain exceptions, restrictions on incurring additional indebtedness, mandatory prepayment provisions associated with specified asset sales and dispositions, and limitations on i) investments; ii) certain acquisitions, mergers or consolidations; iii) sale and leaseback transactions; iv) certain transactions with affiliates; and v) dividends and other payments in respect of capital stock.

The revolving credit facility has an available borrowing base of $540 million and $528 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company had $41 million and $43 million of letters of credit outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, pertaining to the term loan credit facility. To the extent letters of credit associated with the revolving credit facility are issued, there is a corresponding decrease in borrowings available under this facility.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the estimated fair values of the Company’s Debt Facilities were $2,700 and $2,701 million, respectively. The estimated fair values were $71 million lower at June 30, 2011 and $73 million lower at December 31, 2010 than their respective carrying values. Fair market values are developed by the use of estimates obtained from brokers and other appropriate valuation techniques based on information available as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The fair value estimates do not necessarily reflect the values the Company could realize in the current markets.

11.

PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS

The Company sponsors several defined benefit pension plans (“Pension Benefits”) and health care and life insurance benefits (“Other Postemployment Benefits” or “OPEB”) for certain employees and retirees around the world. Components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) for the three months ended June 30 are as follows:


	Pension Benefits												Other Postemployment Benefits
	United States Plans						Non-U.S. Plans						Other Postemployment Benefits
	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Service cost	$	5		$	5		$	2		$	2		$	—		$	—
Interest cost		14			15			4			4			5			5
Expected return on plan assets		(14	)		(12	)		(1	)		(1	)		—			—
Amortization of actuarial loss		6			6			—			—			—			—
Amortization of prior service credit		—			—			—			—			(4	)		(3	)
OPEB curtailment gain		—			—			—			—			—			(4	)

Net periodic benefit cost (credit)	$	11		$	14		$	5		$	5		$	1		$	(2	)

Components of net periodic benefit cost for the six months ended June 30 are as follows:


	Pension Benefits												Other Postemployment Benefits
	United States Plans						Non-U.S. Plans						Other Postemployment Benefits
	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Service cost	$	10		$	11		$	4		$	4		$	—		$	—
Interest cost		29			30			9			8			10			12
Expected return on plan assets		(28	)		(24	)		(2	)		(2	)		—			—
Amortization of actuarial loss		12			12			—			—			—			—
Amortization of prior service credit		—			—			—			—			(8	)		(3	)
OPEB curtailment gain		—			—			—			—			—			(4	)

Net periodic benefit cost	$	23		$	29		$	11		$	10		$	2		$	5

On May 6, 2010, the Company approved an amendment to its U.S. Welfare Benefit Plan which eliminated Other Postemployment Benefits for certain salaried and non-union hourly employees and retirees effective July 1, 2010. This amendment reduced the Company’s accumulated postemployment benefit obligation (“APBO”) by $135 million, of which $131 million is being amortized over the average remaining service lives of active participants (approximately 9 years). The remaining $4 million resulted in an OPEB curtailment gain, which was recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.

12.

INCOME TAXES

Income Taxes

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded income tax expense of $31 million on income before income taxes of $149 million. This compares to income tax expense of $11 million on income before income taxes of $78 million in the same period of 2010. The income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 differs from statutory rates due primarily to pre-tax income taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate and income in jurisdictions with no tax expense due to offsetting valuation allowance releases, partially offset by pre-tax losses with no tax benefits. The income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 differs from the U.S. statutory rate due primarily to pre-tax income taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate and income in jurisdictions with no tax expense due to offsetting valuation allowance releases, partially offset by pre-tax losses with no tax benefits and the reversal of a valuation allowance against net deferred assets of a subsidiary.

The Company believes that it is reasonably possible that its unrecognized tax benefits in multiple jurisdictions, which primarily relates to transfer pricing, corporate reorganization and various other matters, may decrease by approximately $321 million within the next 12 months due to audit settlements or statute expirations, of which approximately $46 million, if recognized, could impact the effective tax rate.

In conjunction with the Company’s ongoing review of its actual results and anticipated future earnings, the Company reassesses the possibility of releasing valuation allowances. Based upon this assessment, the Company has concluded that there is more than a remote possibility that existing valuation allowances in certain jurisdictions of up to $250 million as of June 30, 2011 could be released within the next 12 months. If releases of such valuation allowances occur, it may have a significant impact on net income in the quarter in which it is deemed appropriate to release the reserve.

13.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Environmental Matters

The Company is a defendant in lawsuits filed, or the recipient of administrative orders issued or demand letters received, in various jurisdictions pursuant to the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”) or other similar national, provincial or state environmental remedial laws. These laws provide that responsible parties may be liable to pay for remediating contamination resulting from hazardous substances that were discharged into the environment by them, by prior owners or occupants of property they currently own or operate, or by others to whom they sent such substances for treatment or other disposition at third party locations. The Company has been notified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, other national environmental agencies, and various provincial and state agencies that it may be a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) under such laws for the cost of remediating hazardous substances pursuant to CERCLA and other national and state or provincial environmental laws. PRP designation typically requires the funding of site investigations and subsequent remedial activities.

Many of the sites that are likely to be the costliest to remediate are often current or former commercial waste disposal facilities to which numerous companies sent wastes. Despite the potential joint and several liability which might be imposed on the Company under CERCLA and some of the other laws pertaining to these sites, the Company’s share of the total waste sent to these sites has generally been small. The Company believes its exposure for liability at these sites is limited.

The Company has also identified certain other present and former properties at which it may be responsible for cleaning up or addressing environmental contamination, in some cases as a result of contractual commitments and/or federal or state environmental laws. The Company is actively seeking to resolve these actual and potential statutory, regulatory and contractual obligations. Although difficult to quantify based on the complexity of the issues, the Company has accrued amounts corresponding to its best estimate of the costs associated with such regulatory and contractual obligations on the basis of available information from site investigations and best professional judgment of consultants.

Total environmental liabilities, determined on an undiscounted basis, were $18 million and $19 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and are included in the consolidated balance sheets as follows:


	June 30 2011		December 31 2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Other current liabilities	$	5	$	5
Other accrued liabilities (noncurrent)		13		14

	$	18	$	19

Management believes that recorded environmental liabilities will be adequate to cover the Company’s estimated liability for its exposure in respect to such matters. In the event that such liabilities were to significantly exceed the amounts recorded by the Company, the Company’s results of operations and financial condition could be materially affected. At June 30, 2011, management estimates that reasonably possible material additional losses above and beyond management’s best estimate of required remediation costs as recorded approximate $45 million.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company records asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 410, Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations. The Company’s primary ARO activities relate to the removal of hazardous building materials at its facilities. The Company records an ARO at fair value upon initial recognition when the amount can be reasonably estimated, typically upon the expectation that an operating site may be closed or sold. ARO fair values are determined based on the Company’s determination of what a third party would charge to perform the remediation activities, generally using a present value technique. The Company has identified sites with contractual obligations and several sites that are closed or expected to be closed and sold. In connection with these sites, the Company has accrued $27 million and $25 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, for ARO, primarily related to anticipated costs of removing hazardous building materials, and has considered impairment issues that may result from capitalization of these ARO amounts.

For those sites that the Company identifies in the future for closure or sale, or for which it otherwise believes it has a reasonable basis to assign probabilities to a range of potential settlement dates, the Company will review these sites for both ARO and impairment issues.

Liabilities for ARO are included in the consolidated balance sheets as follows:


	June 30 2011		December 31 2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Other current liabilities	$	2	$	9
Other accrued liabilities (noncurrent)		25		16

	$	27	$	25

The Company has conditional asset retirement obligations (“CARO”), primarily related to removal costs of hazardous materials in buildings, for which it believes reasonable cost estimates cannot be made at this time because the Company does not believe it has a reasonable basis to assign probabilities to a range of potential settlement dates for these retirement obligations. Accordingly, the Company is currently unable to determine amounts to accrue for CARO at such sites.

Other Matters

The Company is involved in other legal actions and claims, directly and through its subsidiaries. Management does not believe that the outcomes of these other actions or claims are likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

14.

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The Company’s comprehensive income consists of the following:


	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Net income attributable to Federal-Mogul	$	64		$	49		$	115		$	63

Foreign currency translation adjustments and other		30			(91	)		107			(123	)

Hedge instruments		(8	)		(17	)		(3	)		(26	)
Income taxes		—			—			—			—

Hedge instruments, net of tax		(8	)		(17	)		(3	)		(26	)

Postemployment benefits		2			138			4			144
Income taxes		—			—			—			—

Postemployment benefits, net of tax		2			138			4			144

	$	88		$	79		$	223		$	58

15.

WARRANTS

On December 27, 2007, the Company issued 6,951,871 warrants to purchase common shares of the Company at an exercise price equal to $45.815, exercisable through December 27, 2014. All of these warrants remain outstanding as of June 30, 2011.

16.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

CEO Stock-Based Compensation Agreement

On March 23, 2010, the Company entered into the Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, which extended José Maria Alapont’s employment with the Company for three years. Also on March 23, 2010, the Company amended and restated the Stock Option Agreement by and between the Company and Mr. Alapont dated as of February 15, 2008 (the “Restated Stock Option Agreement”). The Restated Stock Option Agreement removed Mr. Alapont’s put option to sell stock received from a stock option exercise to the Company for cash. The Restated Stock Option Agreement provides for pay out of any exercise of Mr. Alapont’s stock options in stock or, at the election of the Company, in cash. The awards were previously accounted for as liability awards based on the optional cash exercise feature, however the accounting impact associated with this modification is that the options are now considered an equity award as of March 23, 2010. The Company revalued the four million stock options granted to Mr. Alapont at March 23, 2010, resulting in a revised fair value of $27 million. This amount was reclassified from “Other accrued liabilities” to “Additional paid-in capital” due to their equity award status. As these stock options were fully vested as of March 23, 2010, no further expense related to these options will be recognized. These options had intrinsic values of $13 million and $5 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. These options expire on December 27, 2014.

The Company revalued Mr. Alapont’s Deferred Compensation Agreement, which was also amended and restated on March 23, 2010, resulting in a revised fair value of $6 million at June 30, 2011. The amended and restated agreement included no changes that impacted the accounting for this agreement. Since the revised and restated agreement continue to provide for net cash settlement at the option of Mr. Alapont, it continues to be treated as a liability award as of June 30, 2011 and through its eventual payout. The amount of the payout shall be equal to the fair value of 500,000 shares of stock, subject to certain adjustments and offsets. During both of the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized $1 million in expense associated with Mr. Alapont’s Deferred Compensation Agreement. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized immaterial income associated with Mr. Alapont’s Deferred Compensation Agreement. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized $7 million in expense associated with Mr. Alapont’s stock options and Deferred Compensation Agreement.

The June 30, 2011 deferred compensation fair value was estimated using the Monte Carlo valuation model with the following assumptions:


Exercise price			N/A
Expected volatility			55%
Expected dividend yield			0%
Risk-free rate over the estimated expected option life			0.29%
Expected life (in years)			1.75

Expected volatility is based on the average of five-year historical volatility and implied volatility for a group of auto industry comparator companies as of the measurement date. Risk-free rate is determined based upon U.S. Treasury rates over the estimated expected life. Expected dividend yield is zero as the Company has not paid dividends to holders of its common stock in the recent past nor does it expect to do so in the future. Expected life is equal to one-half of the time to the end of the term.

Stock Appreciation Rights

A summary of the Company’s stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) activity as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2011 is as follows:


	SARs			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(Thousands)					(Years)		(Millions)
Outstanding at January 1, 2011		401		$	17.16
Granted		1,039			21.03
Exercised		(11	)		19.14
Forfeited		(5	)		19.61

Outstanding at March 31, 2011		1,424		$	19.96		4.6	$	7
Granted		4			21.03
Exercised		(22	)		19.74
Forfeited		(3	)		19.78

Outstanding at June 30, 2011		1,403		$	19.97		4.5	$	4

Exercisable at June 30, 2011		359		$	19.74		4.4	$	1

In February 2011 and 2010, the Company granted approximately 1,039,000 and 437,000 SARs, respectively, to certain employees. The SARs granted in February 2011 (“2011 SARs”) vested 25.0% on grant date and 25.0% on each of the next three anniversaries of the grant date. The SARs granted in February 2010 (“2010 SARs”) vest 33.3% on each of the three anniversaries of the grant date. All SARs have a term of five years from date of grant. The SARs are payable in cash or, at the election of the Company, in stock. As the Company anticipates paying out SARs exercises in the form of cash, the SARs are being treated as liability awards for accounting purposes. The Company valued the 2011 SARs and the 2010 SARs at June 30, 2011 resulting in fair values of $8 million and $3 million, respectively. The Company recognized SARs income of $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The Company recognized SARs expense of $1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. SARs expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was immaterial.

The June 30, 2011 SARs fair values were estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model with the following assumptions:


	2011 SARs		2010 SARs
Exercise price	$	21.03	$	17.16
Expected volatility		55%		55%
Expected dividend yield		0%		0%
Risk-free rate over the estimated expected life		0.56%		0.38%
Expected life (in years)		2.96		2.22

Expected volatility is based on the average of five-year historical volatility and implied volatility for a group of auto industry comparator companies as of the measurement date. Risk-free rate is determined based upon U.S. Treasury rates over the estimated expected lives. Expected dividend yield is zero as the Company has not paid dividends to holders of its common stock in the recent past nor does it expect to do so in the future. Expected life is the average of the time until the award is fully vested and the end of the term.

17.

INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income per common share:


	Three Months Ended June 30				Six Months Ended June 30
	2011		2010		2011		2010
	(Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts)

Net income attributable to Federal-Mogul shareholders	$	64	$	49	$	115	$	63

Weighted average shares outstanding, basic (in millions)		98.9		98.9		98.9		98.9

Incremental shares on assumed conversion of stock options (in millions)		0.7		—		0.6		—

Incremental shares on assumed conversion of deferred compensation stock (in millions)		0.2		0.5		0.2		0.5


Weighted average shares outstanding, including dilutive shares (in millions)		99.8		99.4		99.7		99.4

Net income per share attributable to Federal-Mogul:
Basic	$	0.65	$	0.50	$	1.16	$	0.64
Diluted	$	0.64	$	0.49	$	1.15	$	0.63

Warrants to purchase 6,951,871 common shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the Company’s common shares during these periods. Options to purchase 4,000,000 common shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the Company’s common shares during these periods.

The 500,000 common shares issued in connection with the Deferred Compensation Agreement described in Note 16 are excluded from the basic earnings per share calculation as required by FASB ASC Topic 710, Compensation.

18.

OPERATIONS BY REPORTING SEGMENT

The Company’s integrated operations are organized into five reporting segments generally corresponding to major product groups: Powertrain Energy, Powertrain Sealing and Bearings, Vehicle Safety and Protection, Global Aftermarket and Corporate.

The accounting policies of the reporting segments are the same as those of the Company. Revenues related to products sold from Powertrain Energy, Powertrain Sealing and Bearings, and Vehicle Safety and Protection to OE customers are recorded within the respective reporting segments. Revenues from such products sold to aftermarket customers are recorded within the Global Aftermarket segment. All product transferred into Global Aftermarket from other reporting segments is transferred at cost in the United States and at agreed-upon arm’s-length transfer prices internationally.

The Company evaluates reporting segment performance principally on a non-GAAP Operational EBITDA basis. Management believes that Operational EBITDA most closely approximates the cash flow associated with the operational earnings of the Company and uses Operational EBITDA to measure the performance of its operations. Operational EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and certain items such as restructuring and impairment charges, Chapter 11 and U.K. Administration related reorganization expenses, gains or losses on the sales of businesses, expense associated with U.S. based funded pension plans and OPEB curtailment gains or losses.

Net sales, cost of products sold and gross margin information by reporting segment are as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30
	Net Sales				Cost of Products Sold				Gross Margin
	2011		2010		2011		2010		2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Powertrain Energy	$	597	$	455	$	515	$	400	$	82		$	55
Powertrain Sealing and Bearings		333		278		294		247		39			31
Vehicle Safety and Protection		258		231		196		167		62			64
Global Aftermarket		612		634		493		504		119			130
Corporate		—		—		3		6		(3	)		(6	)

	$	1,800	$	1,598	$	1,501	$	1,324	$	299		$	274


	Six Months Ended June 30
	Net Sales				Cost of Products Sold				Gross Margin
	2011		2010		2011		2010		2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Powertrain Energy	$	1,169	$	890	$	1,018	$	777	$	151		$	113
Powertrain Sealing and Bearings		652		549		576		492		76			57
Vehicle Safety and Protection		514		462		389		336		125			126
Global Aftermarket		1,189		1,186		960		953		229			233
Corporate		—		—		3		1		(3	)		(1	)

	$	3,524	$	3,087	$	2,946	$	2,559	$	578		$	528

Operational EBITDA by reporting segment and the reconciliation of Operational EBITDA to net income are as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30								Six Months Ended June 30
	2011				2010				2011				2010
	(Millions of Dollars)								(Millions of Dollars)
Powertrain Energy		$	89			$	71			$	168			$	141
Powertrain Sealing and Bearings			33				29				62				53
Vehicle Safety and Protection			54				60				107				117
Global Aftermarket			74				94				143				159
Corporate			(50	)			(55	)			(102	)			(133	)

Total Operational EBITDA			200				199				378				337

Depreciation and amortization			(71	)			(81	)			(139	)			(162	)
Interest expense, net			(32	)			(32	)			(63	)			(65	)
Expense associated with U.S. based funded pension plans			(11	)			(13	)			(22	)			(26	)
Adjustment of assets to fair value			(3	)			(4	)			(3	)			(8	)
Restructuring expense, net			—				(5	)			(1	)			(6	)
OPEB curtailment gain			—				4				—				4
Income tax expense			(17	)			(18	)			(31	)			(11	)
Other			(1	)			—				(1	)			4

Net income		$	65			$	50			$	118			$	67

Total assets by reporting segment are as follows:


	June 30 2011			December 31 2010
	June 30 2011			December 31 2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Powertrain Energy		$	2,035		$	1,813
Powertrain Sealing and Bearings			971			856
Vehicle Safety and Protection			1,632			1,578
Global Aftermarket			2,042			1,908
Corporate			1,016			1,141

		$	7,696		$	7,296

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained or incorporated in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q which are not statements of historical fact constitute “Forward-Looking Statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”). Forward-looking statements give current expectations or forecasts of future events. Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “seek” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with discussions of future operating or financial performance signify forward-looking statements. The Company also, from time to time, may provide oral or written forward-looking statements in other materials released to the public. Such statements are made in good faith by the Company pursuant to the “Safe Harbor” provisions of the Reform Act.

Any or all forward-looking statements included in this report or in any other public statements may ultimately be incorrect. Forward-looking statements may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance, experience or achievements of the Company to differ materially from any future results, performance, experience or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

All of the forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Annual Report”) filed on February 23, 2011, as well as the risks and uncertainties discussed elsewhere in the Annual Report and this report. Other factors besides those listed could also materially affect the Company’s business.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of financial condition and results of operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the MD&A included in the Company’s Annual Report.

Overview

Federal-Mogul Corporation is a leading global supplier of technology and innovation in vehicle and industrial products for fuel economy, emissions reduction, alternative energies, environment and safety systems. The Company serves the world’s foremost original equipment manufacturers and servicers (“OE”) of automotive, light, medium and heavy-duty commercial vehicles, off-road, agricultural, marine, rail, aerospace, power generation and industrial equipment, as well as the worldwide aftermarket. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company derived 66% of its sales from the OE market and 34% from the aftermarket. The Company seeks to participate in both of these markets by leveraging its original equipment product engineering and development capability, manufacturing know-how, and expertise in managing a broad and deep range of replacement parts to service the aftermarket. The Company believes that it is uniquely positioned to effectively manage the life cycle of a broad range of products to a diverse customer base.

Federal-Mogul has established a global presence and conducts its operations through various manufacturing, distribution and technical centers that are wholly-owned subsidiaries or partially-owned joint ventures. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company derived 36% of its sales in the United States and 64% internationally. The Company has operations in established markets including Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States, and emerging markets including Argentina, Brazil, China, Czech Republic, Hungary, India, Korea, Mexico, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Thailand, Turkey and Venezuela. The attendant risks of the Company’s international operations are primarily related to currency fluctuations, changes in local economic and political conditions, and changes in laws and regulations.

Federal-Mogul offers its customers a diverse array of market-leading products for OE and replacement parts (“aftermarket”) applications, including pistons, piston rings, piston pins, cylinder liners, valve seats and guides, ignition products, dynamic seals, bonded piston seals, combustion and exhaust gaskets, static gaskets and seals, rigid heat shields, engine bearings, industrial bearings, bushings and washers, transmission components, brake disc pads, brake linings, brake blocks, element resistant systems protection sleeving products, acoustic shielding, flexible heat shields, brake system components, chassis products, wipers, fuel pumps and lighting.

The Company operates in an extremely competitive industry, driven by global vehicle production volumes and part replacement trends. Business is typically awarded to the supplier offering the most favorable combination of cost, quality, technology and service. Customers continue to require periodic cost reductions that require the Company to continually assess, redefine and improve its operations, products, and manufacturing capabilities to maintain and improve profitability. Management continues to develop and execute initiatives to meet the challenges of the industry and to achieve its strategy for sustainable global profitable growth.

For a more detailed description of the Company’s business, products, industry, operating strategy and associated risks, refer to the Annual Report.

Results of Operations

Consolidated Results – Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 vs. Three Months Ended June 30, 2010

Net sales by reporting segment are:


	Three Months Ended June 30
	2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Powertrain Energy		$	597		$	455
Powertrain Sealing and Bearings			333			278
Vehicle Safety and Protection			258			231
Global Aftermarket			612			634

		$	1,800		$	1,598

The percentage of net sales by group and region for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are listed below. “PTE,” “PTSB,” “VSP,” and “GA” represent Powertrain Energy, Powertrain Sealing and Bearings, Vehicle Safety and Protection, and Global Aftermarket, respectively.


	PTE	PTSB	VSP	GA	Total
2011
United States and Canada	22%	32%	29%	61%	37%
Europe	58%	53%	50%	24%	45%
Rest of World	20%	15%	21%	15%	18%

2010
United States and Canada	23%	36%	30%	67%	43%
Europe	56%	49%	49%	20%	40%
Rest of World	21%	15%	21%	13%	17%

Cost of products sold by reporting segment is:


	Three Months Ended June 30
	2011		2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Powertrain Energy	$	515	$	400
Powertrain Sealing and Bearings		294		247
Vehicle Safety and Protection		196		167
Global Aftermarket		493		504
Corporate		3		6

	$	1,501	$	1,324

Gross margin by reporting segment is:


	Three Months Ended June 30
	2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Powertrain Energy	$	82		$	55
Powertrain Sealing and Bearings		39			31
Vehicle Safety and Protection		62			64
Global Aftermarket		119			130
Corporate		(3	)		(6	)

	$	299		$	274

Net sales increased by $202 million to $1,800 million for the second quarter of 2011 from $1,598 million in the same period of 2010. The impact of the U.S. dollar weakening, primarily against the euro, increased reported sales by $98 million.

In general, light and commercial vehicle OE production increased in most regions and, when combined with market share gains in all regions across all three manufacturing segments, resulted in increased OE sales of $129 million. Aftermarket sales decreased by $42 million due to sales decreases in North America, partially offset by sales increases in all other regions. The acquisition of the Daros Group increased sales volume by $8 million. Net customer price increases were $9 million.

Cost of products sold increased by $177 million to $1,501 million for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $1,324 million in the same period of 2010. The impact of the relative weakness of the U.S. dollar increased cost of products sold by $89 million. Manufacturing, labor and variable overhead costs increased by $95 million as a direct consequence of the higher production volumes, inclusive of $6 million of such costs associated with the Daros Group. Additional increases were unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $4 million and increased materials and services sourcing costs of $2 million. These increases were partially offset by decreased depreciation of $13 million.

Gross margin increased by $25 million to $299 million, or 16.6% of sales, for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $274 million, or 17.1% of sales, in the same period of 2010. This increase was due to decreased depreciation of $13 million, customer price increases of $9 million, currency movements of $9 million and $2 million directly related to the acquisition of the Daros Group, partially offset by unfavorable productivity, net of benefits and labor inflation, of $4 million, increased materials and services sourcing costs of $2 million and unfavorable sales mix of $2 million.

Reporting Segment Results – Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 vs. Three Months Ended June 30, 2010

The following table provides a reconciliation of changes in sales, cost of products sold, gross margin and Operational EBITDA for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the three months ended June 30, 2010 for each of the Company’s reporting segments. Operational EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and certain items such as restructuring and impairment charges, Chapter 11 and U.K. Administration related reorganization expenses, gains or losses on the sales of businesses, expense associated with U.S. based funded pension plans and OPEB curtailment gains or losses.


	PTE			PTSB			VSP			GA			Corporate			Total
	(Millions of Dollars)
Sales
Three months ended June 30, 2010	$	455		$	278		$	231		$	634		$	—		$	1,598
Sales volumes		89			31			9			(42	)		—			87
Customer pricing		8			5			(1	)		(3	)		—			9
Daros acquisition		8			—			—			—			—			8
Foreign currency		37			19			19			23			—			98

Three months ended June 30, 2011	$	597		$	333		$	258		$	612		$	—		$	1,800


	PTE			PTSB			VSP			GA			Corporate			Total
Cost of Products Sold
Three months ended June 30, 2010	$	400		$	247		$	167		$	504		$	6		$	1,324
Sales volumes / mix		72			28			11			(22	)		—			89
Productivity, net of inflation		4			4			1			(2	)		(3	)		4
Materials and services sourcing		2			—			4			(4	)		—			2
Depreciation		(6	)		(3	)		(4	)		—			—			(13	)
Daros acquisition		6			—			—			—			—			6
Foreign currency		37			18			17			17			—			89

Three months ended June 30, 2011	$	515		$	294		$	196		$	493		$	3		$	1,501


	PTE			PTSB			VSP			GA			Corporate			Total
Gross Margin
Three months ended June 30, 2010	$	55		$	31		$	64		$	130		$	(6	)	$	274
Sales volumes / mix		17			3			(2	)		(20	)		—			(2	)
Customer pricing		8			5			(1	)		(3	)		—			9
Productivity, net of inflation		(4	)		(4	)		(1	)		2			3			(4	)
Materials and services sourcing		(2	)		—			(4	)		4			—			(2	)
Depreciation		6			3			4			—			—			13
Daros acquisition		2			—			—			—			—			2
Foreign currency		—			1			2			6			—			9

Three months ended June 30, 2011	$	82		$	39		$	62		$	119		$	(3	)	$	299


	PTE			PTSB			VSP			GA			Corporate			Total
Operational EBITDA
Three months ended June 30, 2010	$	71		$	29		$	60		$	94		$	(55	)	$	199
Sales volumes / mix		17			3			(2	)		(20	)		—			(2	)
Customer pricing		8			5			(1	)		(3	)		—			9
Productivity – Cost of products sold		(4	)		(4	)		(1	)		2			3			(4	)
Productivity – SG&A		(2	)		1			—			(4	)		5			—
Productivity – Other		—			—			—			1			—			1
Sourcing – Cost of products sold		(2	)		—			(4	)		4			—			(2	)
Sourcing – SG&A		—			—			—			—			1			1
Equity earnings of non-consolidated affiliates		2			—			(1	)		(2	)		—			(1	)
Daros acquisition		2			—			—			—			—			2
Foreign currency		(3	)		(2	)		2			4			(3	)		(2	)
Other		—			1			1			(2	)		(1	)		(1	)

Three months ended June 30, 2011	$	89		$	33		$	54		$	74		$	(50	)	$	200

Depreciation and amortization																	(71	)
Interest expense, net																	(32	)
Expense associated with U.S. based funded pension plans																	(11	)
Adjustment of assets to fair value																	(3	)
Income tax expense																	(17	)
Other																	(1	)

Net income																$	65

Powertrain Energy

Sales increased by $142 million, or 31%, to $597 million for the second quarter of 2011 from $455 million in the same period of 2010. PTE generates approximately 80% of its revenue outside the United States and the resulting currency movements increased reported sales by $37 million. Sales volumes increased by $89 million due to OE production volume increases and market share gains in all regions. The acquisition of the Daros Group increased sales by $8 million. Customer pricing increased sales by $8 million.

Cost of products sold increased by $115 million to $515 million for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $400 million in the same period of 2010. This increase was due to a $72 million increase directly associated with improved sales volume, currency movements of $37 million, a $6 million increase directly associated with the Daros Group sales volume, unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $4 million and increased materials and services sourcing costs of $2 million, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation of $6 million.

Gross margin increased by $27 million to $82 million, or 13.7% of sales, for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $55 million, or 12.1% of sales, for the second quarter of 2010. The favorable impact of increased sales volumes contributed to a $17 million increase in gross margin. Other factors contributing to the improved margin were customer price increases of $8 million, decreased depreciation of $6 million and $2 million directly related to the Daros Group. These increases were partially offset by unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $4 million and increased materials and services sourcing costs of $2 million.

Operational EBITDA increased by $18 million to $89 million for the second quarter of 2011 from $71 million in the same period of 2010. The impact of increased sales volumes of $17 million, customer price increases of $8 million, improved equity earnings of non-consolidated affiliates of $2 million and $2 million directly attributable to the Daros Group were partially offset by unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $6 million, currency movements of $3 million and increased materials and services sourcing costs of $2 million.

Powertrain Sealing and Bearings

Sales increased by $55 million, or 20%, to $333 million for the second quarter of 2011 from $278 million in the same period of 2010. PTSB generates approximately 70% of its revenue outside the United States and the resulting currency movements increased reported sales by $19 million. Sales volumes increased by $31 million due to OE production volume increases and market share gains in all regions. Customer pricing increased sales by $5 million.

Cost of products sold increased by $47 million to $294 million for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $247 million in the same period of 2010. This was due to a $28 million increase directly associated with improved sales volume, currency movements of $18 million and unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $4 million, partially offset by decreased depreciation of $3 million.

Gross margin increased by $8 million to $39 million, or 11.7% of sales, for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $31 million, or 11.2% of sales, for the second quarter of 2010. This increase was due to customer price increases of $5 million, decreased depreciation of $3 million, improved sales volumes, which increased gross margin by $3 million, and currency movements of $1 million, partially offset by unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $4 million.

Operational EBITDA increased by $4 million to $33 million for the second quarter of 2011 from $29 million in the same period of 2010. This was due to customer price increases of $5 million, the favorable impact of sales volumes increases of $3 million and other increases of $1 million, partially offset by unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $3 million and currency movements of $2 million.

Vehicle Safety and Protection

Sales increased by $27 million, or 12%, to $258 million for the second quarter of 2010 from $231 million in the same period of 2010. Approximately 70% of VSP sales are generated outside the United States and the resulting currency movements increased reported sales by $19 million. Sales volumes rose by $9 million due to increased OE production and market share gains in all regions. Continued customer pricing pressure reduced sales by $1 million.

Cost of products sold increased by $29 million to $196 million for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $167 million in the same period of 2010. This was due to currency movements of $17 million, an $11 million increase directly associated with improved sales volume, increased materials and services sourcing costs of $4 million and unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $1 million, partially offset by decreased depreciation of $4 million.

Gross margin decreased by $2 million to $62 million, or 24.0% of sales, for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $64 million, or 27.7% of sales, for the second quarter of 2010. This decrease was due to increased materials and services sourcing costs of $4 million, unfavorable sales mix, which decreased gross margin by $2 million, customer price increases of $1 million and unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $1 million, partially offset by decreased depreciation of $4 million and currency movements of $2 million.

Operational EBITDA decreased by $6 million to $54 million for the second quarter of 2011 from $60 million in the same period of 2010. This decrease was due to increased materials and services sourcing costs of $4 million, unfavorable sales mix of $2 million, unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $1 million, customer price increases of $1 million and decreased equity earnings of non-consolidated affiliates of $1 million, partially offset by currency movements of $2 million and other increases of $1 million.

Global Aftermarket

Sales decreased by $22 million, or 3%, to $612 million for the second quarter of 2011, from $634 million in the same period of 2010. This decrease was due to lower sales volumes of $42 million and customer price decreases of $3 million, partially offset by currency movements of $23 million.

Cost of products sold decreased by $11 million to $493 million for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $504 million in the same period of 2010. This was due to a $22 million decrease directly associated with lower sales volume, improved materials and services sourcing costs of $4 million, and favorable productivity in excess of labor and benefits inflation of $2 million, partially offset by currency movements of $17 million.

Gross margin decreased by $11 million to $119 million, or 19.4% of sales, for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $130 million, or 20.5% of sales, in the same period of 2010. This decrease was due to lower sales volume, which decreased gross margin by $20 million, and customer price decreases of $3 million, partially offset by improved materials and services sourcing of $4 million, favorable productivity in excess of labor and benefits inflation of $2 million and currency movements of $6 million.

Operational EBITDA decreased by $20 million to $74 million for the second quarter of 2011 from $94 million in the same period of 2010. This decrease was due to lower sales volume, which decreased gross margin by $20 million, customer price decreases of $3 million, decreased equity earnings of non-consolidated affiliates of $2 million, unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $1 million and other decreases of $2 million, partially offset by improved materials and services sourcing of $4 million and currency movements of $4 million.

Corporate

Operational EBITDA improved by $5 million to $(50) million for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $(55) million in the same period of 2010. This was due to decreased costs, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $8 million and improved materials and services sourcing of $1 million, partially offset by foreign currency movements of $3 million and other decreases of $1 million.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) were $173 million, or 9.6% of net sales, for the second quarter of 2011 as compared to $169 million, or 10.6% of net sales, for the same quarter of 2010. This $4 million increase was due to currency movements of $9 million, partially offset by lower pension and other postemployment benefits expense of $3 million, materials and services sourcing savings of $1 million and reduced depreciation expense of $1 million.

The Company maintains technical centers throughout the world designed to integrate the Company’s leading technologies into advanced products and processes, to provide engineering support for all of the Company’s manufacturing sites, and to provide technological expertise in engineering and design development providing solutions for customers and bringing new, innovative products to market. Included in SG&A were research and development (“R&D”) costs, including product and validation costs, of $43 million for the second quarter of 2011 compared with $38 million for the same period in 2010. As a percentage of OE sales, R&D was 3.6% and 3.9% for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Interest Expense, Net

Net interest expense was $32 million in both the second quarter of 2011 and 2010.

Restructuring Activities

The following is a summary of the Company’s consolidated restructuring liabilities and related activity as of and for the quarter ended June 30, 2011:


	PTE			PTSB			VSP		GA			Corporate		Total
	(Millions of dollars)
Balance at March 31, 2011	$	10		$	6		$	—	$	2		$	1	$	19
Provisions		2			1			—		—			—		3
Reversals		(3	)		—			—		—			—		(3	)
Payments		(5	)		(2	)		—		(1	)		—		(8	)

Balance at June 30, 2011	$	4		$	5		$	—	$	1		$	1	$	11

Other Expense, Net

Other expense, net was $10 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $2 million for the second quarter of 2010.

Foreign currency exchange: The Company recognized $5 million in foreign currency exchange losses during the three months ended June 30, 2011. This was due to unfavorable foreign currency volatility in regions where the transactional currency differs from the functional currency. The Company recognized $2 million in foreign currency exchange gains during the three months ended June 30, 2010.

Adjustment of assets to fair value: The Company recorded $3 million in impairment charges during the second quarter of 2011, of which $2 million related to the establishment of an asset retirement obligation for a Powertrain Energy facility that is closed. As the fair value of the facility did not support the capitalization of this asset retirement obligation, it was impaired. The remaining $1 million in impairment charges recorded during the second quarter of 2011 was made up of immaterial fixed assets impairments at several Company facilities.

The Company recorded $4 million in impairment charges during the second quarter of 2010, of which $3 million related to the identification of a Powertrain Energy facility where the Company’s assessment of future undiscounted cash flows, when compared to the current carrying value of the plant and the equipment, indicated the assets were not fully recoverable. The Company determined the fair value of the assets by applying a probability weighted, expected present value technique to the estimated future cash flows using assumptions a market participant would utilize. The discount rate used is consistent with other long-lived asset fair value measurements. The carrying value of these assets exceeded the resulting fair value by $3 million and an impairment charge was recorded for that amount. The remaining $1 million in impairment charges recorded during the second quarter of 2010 was made up of immaterial fixed assets impairments at several Company facilities.

Income Taxes

For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded income tax expense of $17 million on income before income taxes of $82 million. This compares to income tax expense of $18 million on income before income taxes of $68 million in the same period of 2010. The income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 differs from statutory rates due primarily to pre-tax income taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate and income in jurisdictions with no tax expense due to offsetting valuation allowance releases, partially offset by pre-tax losses with no tax benefits. The income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 differs from the U.S. statutory rate due primarily to pre-tax income taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate and income in jurisdictions with no tax expense due to offsetting valuation allowance releases, partially offset by pre-tax losses with no tax benefits and the reversal of a valuation allowance against net deferred assets of a subsidiary.

Consolidated Results – Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 vs. Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

Net sales by reporting segment are:


	Six Months Ended June 30
	2011		2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Powertrain Energy	$	1,169	$	890
Powertrain Sealing and Bearings		652		549
Vehicle Safety and Protection		514		462
Global Aftermarket		1,189		1,186

	$	3,524	$	3,087

The percentage of net sales by group and region for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:


	PTE			PTSB			VSP			GA			Total
2011
United States and Canada		22	%		31	%		30	%		62	%		38	%
Europe		58	%		53	%		49	%		23	%		44	%
Rest of World		20	%		16	%		21	%		15	%		18	%

2010
United States and Canada		22	%		35	%		29	%		66	%		42	%
Europe		58	%		51	%		50	%		21	%		41	%
Rest of World		20	%		14	%		21	%		13	%		17	%

Cost of products sold by reporting segment is:


	Six Months Ended June 30
	2011		2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Powertrain Energy	$	1,018	$	777
Powertrain Sealing and Bearings		576		492
Vehicle Safety and Protection		389		336
Global Aftermarket		960		953
Corporate		3		1

	$	2,946	$	2,559

Gross margin by reporting segment is:


	Six Months Ended June 30
	2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Powertrain Energy	$	151		$	113
Powertrain Sealing and Bearings		76			57
Vehicle Safety and Protection		125			126
Global Aftermarket		229			233
Corporate		(3	)		(1	)

	$	578		$	528

Net sales increased by $437 million, or 14%, to $3,524 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $3,087 million in the same period of 2010. The impact of the U.S. dollar weakening, primarily against the euro, increased reported sales by $106 million.

In general, light and commercial vehicle OE production increased in all regions and, when combined with market share gains in all regions across all three manufacturing segments, resulted in increased OE sales of $331 million. Aftermarket sales decreased by $15 million due to sales decreases North America, partially offset by sales increases in all other regions. The acquisition of the Daros Group increased sales volume by $16 million. Net customer price decreases were $1 million.

Cost of products sold increased by $387 million to $2,946 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $2,559 million in the same period of 2010. The impact of the relative weakness of the U.S. dollar increased cost of products sold by $100 million. Manufacturing, labor and variable overhead costs increased by $289 million as a direct consequence of the higher production volumes, inclusive of $12 million of such costs associated with the Daros Group. Additional increases were unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $15 million and increased materials and services sourcing costs of $10 million. These increases were partially offset by decreased depreciation of $26 million and reduced pension expense of $1 million.

Gross margin increased by $50 million to $578 million, or 16.4% of sales, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $528 million, or 17.1% of sales, in the same period of 2010. This increase was due to sales volume increases, which increased gross margin by $39 million, decreased depreciation of $26 million, currency movements of $6 million, $4 million directly related to the acquisition of the Daros Group and decreased pension expense of $1 million, partially offset by unfavorable productivity, net of benefits and labor inflation, of $15 million, increased materials and services sourcing costs of $10 million and customer price decreases of $1 million.

Reporting Segment Results – Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 vs. Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

The following table provides a reconciliation of changes in sales, cost of products sold, gross margin and Operational EBITDA for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2010 for each of the Company’s reporting segments. Operational EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and certain items such as restructuring and impairment charges, Chapter 11 and U.K. Administration related reorganization expenses, gains or losses on the sales of businesses, expense associated with U.S. based funded pension plans and OPEB curtailment gains or losses.


	PTE			PTSB			VSP			GA			Corporate			Total
	(Millions of Dollars)
Sales
Six months ended June 30, 2010	$	890		$	549		$	462		$	1,186		$	—		$	3,087
Sales volumes		217			80			34			(15	)		—			316
Customer pricing		8			5			(4	)		(10	)		—			(1	)
Daros acquisition		16			—			—			—			—			16
Foreign currency		38			18			22			28			—			106

Six months ended June 30, 2011	$	1,169		$	652		$	514		$	1,189		$	—		$	3,524


	PTE			PTSB			VSP			GA			Corporate			Total
Cost of Products Sold
Six months ended June 30, 2010	$	777		$	492		$	336		$	953		$	1		$	2,559
Sales volumes / mix		174			68			33			2			—			277
Productivity, net of inflation		15			4			(1	)		(4	)		1			15
Materials and services sourcing		9			1			7			(9	)		2			10
Pension		—			—			—			—			(1	)		(1	)
Depreciation		(11	)		(7	)		(7	)		(1	)		—			(26	)
Daros acquisition		12			—			—			—			—			12
Foreign currency		42			18			21			19			—			100

Six months ended June 30, 2011	$	1,018		$	576		$	389		$	960		$	3		$	2,946


	PTE			PTSB			VSP			GA			Corporate			Total
Gross Margin
Six months ended June 30, 2010	$	113		$	57		$	126		$	233		$	(1	)	$	528
Sales volumes / mix		43			12			1			(17	)		—			39
Customer pricing		8			5			(4	)		(10	)		—			(1	)
Productivity, net of inflation		(15	)		(4	)		1			4			(1	)		(15	)
Materials and services sourcing		(9	)		(1	)		(7	)		9			(2	)		(10	)
Pension		—			—			—			—			1			1
Depreciation		11			7			7			1			—			26
Daros acquisition		4			—			—			—			—			4
Foreign currency		(4	)		—			1			9			—			6

Six months ended June 30, 2011	$	151		$	76		$	125		$	229		$	(3	)	$	578


	PTE			PTSB			VSP			GA			Corporate			Total
Operational EBITDA
Six months ended June 30, 2010	$	140		$	53		$	117		$	159		$	(132	)	$	337
Sales volumes / mix		43			12			1			(17	)		—			39
Customer pricing		8			5			(4	)		(10	)		—			(1	)
Productivity – Cost of products sold		(15	)		(4	)		1			4			(1	)		(15	)
Productivity – SG&A		(3	)		(1	)		(3	)		(6	)		3			(10	)
Productivity – Other		—			2			—			(1	)		—			1
Sourcing – Cost of products sold		(9	)		(1	)		(7	)		9			(2	)		(10	)
Sourcing – SG&A		—			—			—			—			2			2
Equity earnings of non-consolidated affiliates		5			(1	)		(1	)		(1	)		—			2
Sourcing – Other		—			—			—			—			(1	)		(1	)
Stock-based compensation expense		—			—			—			—			6			6
Daros acquisition		4			—			—			—			—			4
Foreign currency		(4	)		(2	)		2			5			19			20
Other		(1	)		(1	)		1			1			4			4

Six months ended June 30, 2011	$	168		$	62		$	107		$	143		$	(102	)	$	378

Depreciation and amortization																	(139	)
Interest expense, net																	(63	)
Expense associated with U.S. based funded pension plans																	(22	)
Adjustment of assets to fair value																	(3	)
Restructuring expense, net																	(1	)
Income tax expense																	(31	)
Other																	(1	)

Net income																$	118

Powertrain Energy

Sales increased by $279 million, or 31%, to $1,169 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $890 million in the same period of 2010. PTE generates approximately 80% of its revenue outside the United States and the resulting currency movements increased reported sales by $38 million. Sales volumes increased by $217 million due to OE production volume increases and market share gains in all regions. The acquisition of the Daros Group increased sales by $16 million. Customer pricing increased sales by $8 million.

Cost of products sold increased by $241 million to $1,018 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $777 million in the same period of 2010. This was due to a $174 million increase directly associated with improved sales volume, currency movements of $42 million, unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $15 million, a $12 million increase directly associated with the Daros Group sales volume and increased materials and services sourcing costs of $9 million, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation of $11 million.

Gross margin increased by $38 million to $151 million, or 12.9% of sales, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $113 million, or 12.7% of sales, for the same period of 2010. The favorable impact of increased sales volumes contributed to a $43 million increase in gross margin. Other factors contributing to the improved margin were decreased depreciation of $11 million, customer price increases of $8 million and $4 million directly related to the Daros Group. These increases were partially offset by unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $15 million, increased materials and services sourcing costs of $9 million and currency movements of $4 million.

Operational EBITDA increased by $28 million to $168 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $140 million in the same period of 2010. The impact of increased sales volumes of $43 million, customer price increases of $8 million, improved equity earnings of non-consolidated affiliates of $5 million and $4 million directly attributable to the Daros Group were partially offset by unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $18 million, increased materials and services sourcing costs of $9 million, currency movements of $4 million and other decreases of $1 million.

Powertrain Sealing and Bearings

Sales increased by $103 million, or 19%, to $652 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $549 million in the same period of 2010. PTSB generates approximately 70% of its revenue outside the United States and the resulting currency movements increased reported sales by $18 million. Sales volumes increased by $80 million due to OE production volume increases and market share gains in all regions. Customer pricing increased sales by $5 million.

Cost of products sold increased by $84 million to $576 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $492 million in the same period of 2010. This was due to a $68 million increase directly associated with improved sales volume, currency movements of $18 million, unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $4 million and increased materials and services sourcing costs of $1 million, partially offset by decreased depreciation of $7 million.

Gross margin increased by $19 million to $76 million, or 11.7% of sales, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $57 million, or 10.4% of sales, for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase was due to improved sales volumes, which increased gross margin by $12 million, decreased depreciation of $7 million and customer price increases of $5 million, partially offset by unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $4 million and increased material and services sourcing costs of $1 million.

Operational EBITDA increased by $9 million to $62 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $53 million in the same period of 2010. This was due to the favorable impact of sales volumes increases of $12 million and customer price increases of $5 million, partially offset by unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $3 million, currency movements of $2 million, increased materials and services sourcing costs of $1 million, decreased equity earnings of non-consolidated affiliates of $1 million and other decreases of $1 million.

Vehicle Safety and Protection

Sales increased by $52 million, or 11%, to $514 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $462 million in the same period of 2010. Approximately 70% of VSP sales are generated outside the United States and the resulting currency movements increased reported sales by $22 million. Sales volumes rose by $34 million due to increased OE production and market share gains in all regions. Continued customer pricing pressure reduced sales by $4 million.

Cost of products sold increased by $53 million to $389 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $336 million in the same period of 2010. This was due to a $33 million increase directly associated with improved sales volume, currency movements of $21 million and increased materials and services sourcing costs of $7 million, partially offset by decreased depreciation of $7 million and productivity improvements in excess of labor and benefits inflation of $1 million.

Gross margin decreased by $1 million to $125 million, or 24.3% of sales, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $126 million, or 27.3% of sales, for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This was due to increased materials and services sourcing costs of $7 million and customer price decreases of $4 million being mostly offset by decreased depreciation of $7 million, improved sales volume, which increased gross margin by $1 million, favorable productivity in excess of labor and benefits inflation of $1 million and currency movements of $1 million.

Operational EBITDA decreased by $10 million to $107 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $117 million in the same period of 2010. This decrease was due to increased materials and services sourcing costs of $7 million, customer price decreases of $4 million, unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $2 million and decreased equity earnings of non-consolidated affiliates of $1 million, partially offset by the favorable impact of currency movements of $2 million, sales volumes increases of $1 million and other increases of $1 million.

Global Aftermarket

Sales increased by $3 million to $1,189 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, from $1,186 million in the same period of 2010. This increase was due to currency movements of $28 million, partially offset by sales volume decreases of $15 million and customer price decreases of $10 million.

Cost of products sold increased by $7 million to $960 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $953 million in the same period of 2010. This was due to currency movements of $19 million and $2 million directly associated with sales mix, partially offset by materials and services sourcing savings of $9 million, favorable productivity in excess of labor and benefits inflation of $4 million and decreased depreciation of $1 million.

Gross margin decreased by $4 million to $229 million, or 19.3% of sales, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $233 million, or 19.6% of sales, in the same period of 2010. This decrease was due to unfavorable sales mix, which decreased gross margin by $17 million and customer price decreases of $10 million, partially offset by currency movements of $9 million, improved materials and services sourcing of $9 million, favorable productivity in excess of labor and benefits inflation of $4 million and decreased depreciation of $1 million.

Operational EBITDA decreased by $16 million to $143 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $159 million in the same period of 2010. This decrease was due to unfavorable sales mix of $17 million, customer price decreases of $10 million, unfavorable productivity, net of labor and benefits inflation, of $3 million and decreased equity earnings of non-consolidated affiliates of $1 million, partially offset by materials and services sourcing savings of $9 million, currency movements of $5 million and other increases of $1 million.

Corporate

Operational EBITDA improved by $30 million to $(102) million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $(132) million in the same period of 2010. This improvement was due to foreign currency movements of $19 million, decreased stock-based compensation expense of $6 million, productivity in excess of labor and benefits inflation of $2 million and other increases of $4 million, partially offset by increased materials and services sourcing costs of $1 million.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) were $350 million, or 9.9% of net sales, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $353 million, or 11.4% of net sales, for the same period of 2010. This $3 million decrease was due to lower pension and other postemployment benefits expense of $11 million, lower stock-based compensation expense of $6 million, materials and services sourcing savings of $2 million, reduced depreciation expense of $2 million and other reductions of $1 million, partially offset by unfavorable overhead costs of $10 million and currency movements of $9 million.

The Company maintains technical centers throughout the world designed to integrate the Company’s leading technologies into advanced products and processes, to provide engineering support for all of the Company’s manufacturing sites, and to provide technological expertise in engineering and design development providing solutions for customers and bringing new, innovative products to market. Included in SG&A were research and development (“R&D”) costs, including product and validation costs, of $87 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with $77 million for the same period in 2010. As a percentage of OE sales, R&D was 3.7% and 4.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Interest Expense, Net

Net interest expense was $63 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $65 million for the comparable period of 2010.

Restructuring Activities

The following is a quarterly summary of the Company’s consolidated restructuring liabilities and related activity as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2011:


	PTE			PTSB			VSP			GA			Corporate			Total
	(Millions of Dollars)
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	11		$	7		$	1		$	3		$	2		$	24
Provisions		—			1			—			1			—			2
Reversals		—			—			—			(1	)		—			(1	)
Payments		(1	)		(2	)		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)		(6	)

Balance at March 31, 2011		10			6			—			2			1			19
Provisions		2			1			—			—			—			3
Reversals		(3	)		—			—			—			—			(3	)
Payments		(5	)		(2	)		—			(1	)		—			(8	)

Balance at June 30, 2011	$	4		$	5		$	—		$	1		$	1		$	11

Other Expense, Net

Other expense, net was $11 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $23 million for the same period of 2010.

Foreign currency exchange: The Company recognized $6 million in foreign currency exchange losses during the six months ended June 30, 2011. This was due to unfavorable foreign currency volatility in regions where the transactional currency differs from the functional currency.

The Company recognized $22 million in foreign currency exchange losses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. The Company has operated an aftermarket distribution center in Venezuela for several years, supplying imported replacement automotive parts to the local independent aftermarket. Since 2005, two exchange rates have existed in Venezuela: the official rate, which had been frozen since 2005 at 2.15 bolivars per U.S. dollar; and the parallel rate, which floats at a rate much higher than the official rate. Given the existence of the two rates in Venezuela, the Company deemed the official rate was appropriate for the purpose of conversion into U.S. dollars at December 31, 2009 based on no positive intent to repatriate cash at the parallel rate and demonstrated ability to repatriate cash at the official rate.

Adjustment of assets to fair value: The Company recorded $3 million in impairment charges during the second quarter of 2010, of which $2 million related to the establishment of an asset retirement obligation for a Powertrain Energy facility that is closed. As the fair value of the facility did not support the capitalization of this asset retirement obligation, it was impaired. The remaining $1 million in impairment charges recorded during the second quarter of 2011 was made up of immaterial fixed assets impairments at several Company facilities.

The Company recorded $4 million in impairment charges during the second quarter of 2010, of which $3 million related to the identification of a Powertrain Energy facility where the Company’s assessment of future undiscounted cash flows, when compared to the current carrying value of the plant and the equipment, indicated the assets were not fully recoverable. The Company determined the fair value of the assets by applying a probability weighted, expected present value technique to the estimated future cash flows using assumptions a market participant would utilize. The discount rate used is consistent with other long-lived asset fair value measurements. The carrying value of these assets exceeded the resulting fair value by $3 million and an impairment charge was recorded for that amount. The remaining $1 million in impairment charges recorded during the second quarter of 2010 was made up of immaterial fixed assets impairments at several Company facilities.

The Company recorded $4 million in impairment charges during the first quarter of 2010 related to the identification of equipment at a Vehicle Safety and Protection facility where the Company’s assessment of future undiscounted cash flows, when compared to the current carrying value of the equipment, indicated the assets were not recoverable. The Company determined the fair value of the assets by applying a probability weighted, expected present value technique to the estimated future cash flows using assumptions a market participant would utilize. The discount rate used is consistent with other long-lived asset fair value measurements. The carrying value of the assets exceeded the resulting fair value by $4 million and an impairment charge was recorded for that amount.

Income Taxes

Litigation and Environmental Contingencies

For a summary of material litigation and environmental contingencies, refer to Note 13 of the consolidated financial statements, “Commitments and Contingencies.”

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flow provided from operating activities was $90 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to cash flow provided from operating activities of $177 million for the comparable period of 2010. The $87 million year-over-year decrease is largely attributable to a $24 million decrease in cash dividends received from non-consolidated affiliates, a $21 million increase in customer rebate payments, a $14 million increase in supplemental compensation payout, a $13 million increase in cash taxes paid, a $9 million increase in U.S. pension contributions, a $9 million change in working capital outflow and other timing impacts. The $9 million year-over-year change in working capital outflow is comprised of a $127 million increase in inventory outflow, partially offset by a $99 million decrease in accounts receivable outflow ($109 million was generated by an increase in factoring activity, of which $68 million was in North America) and a $19 million increase in accounts payable inflow.

Cash flow used by investing activities was $177 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to cash flow used by investing activities of $135 million for the comparable period of 2010. The $79 million year-over-year increase in capital expenditures is necessary to support sales growth.

In June 2010, the Company acquired 100% ownership of the Daros Group, a privately-owned supplier of high technology piston rings for large-bore engines used in industrial energy generation and commercial shipping, with manufacturing operations in China, Germany and Sweden, for $39 million in cash.

Cash flow used by financing activities was $1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to cash flow used by financing activities of $24 million for the comparable period of 2010. This $23 million reduction in cash flow usage was due to a $17 million change associated with the servicing of factoring arrangements and a $6 million change associated with short-term debt.

The January 8, 2010 bolivar devaluation by the Venezuelan government resulted in the Company’s recognition of $20 million in foreign currency exchange expense, $16 million of which reflected the impact on the cash balance in 2010.

Financing Activities

On December 27, 2007, the Company entered into a Term Loan and Revolving Credit Agreement (the “Debt Facilities”) with Citicorp U.S.A. Inc. as Administrative Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Syndication Agent and certain lenders. The Exit Facilities include a $540 million revolving credit facility (which is subject to a borrowing base and can be increased under certain circumstances and subject to certain conditions) and a $2,960 million term loan credit facility divided into a $1,960 million tranche B loan and a $1,000 million tranche C loan. The obligations under the revolving credit facility mature December 27, 2013 and bear interest for the first six months at LIBOR plus 1.75% or at the alternate base rate (“ABR,” defined as the greater of Citibank, N.A.’s announced prime rate or 0.50% over the Federal Funds Rate) plus 0.75%, and thereafter shall be adjusted in accordance with a pricing grid based on availability under the revolving credit facility. Interest rates on the pricing grid range from LIBOR plus 1.50% to LIBOR plus 2.00% and ABR plus 0.50% to ABR plus 1.00%. The tranche B term loans mature December 27, 2014 and the tranche C term loans mature December 27, 2015. The tranche C term loans are subject to a pre-payment premium, should the Company choose to prepay the loans prior to December 27, 2011. All Debt Facilities term loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.9375% or at the ABR plus 0.9375% at the Company’s election. To the extent that interest rates change by 25 basis points, the Company’s annual interest expense would show a corresponding change of approximately $4 million.

Other Liquidity and Capital Resource Items

The Company maintains investments in several non-consolidated affiliates, which are located in China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Korea, Turkey and the United States. The Company’s direct ownership in such affiliates ranges from approximately 2% to 50%. The aggregate investments in these affiliates were $243 million and $210 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Dividends received from non-consolidated affiliates by the Company during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were less than one million and $24 million, respectively.

The Company’s joint ventures are businesses established and maintained in connection with its operating strategy and are not special purpose entities. In general, the Company does not extend guarantees, loans or other instruments of a variable nature that may result in incremental risk to the Company’s liquidity position. Furthermore, the Company does not rely on dividend payments or other cash flows from its non-consolidated affiliates to fund its operations and, accordingly, does not believe that they have a material effect on the Company’s liquidity.

The Company holds a 50% non-controlling interest in a joint venture located in Turkey. This joint venture was established in 1995 for the purpose of manufacturing and marketing automotive parts, including pistons, piston rings, piston pins, and cylinder liners to OE and aftermarket customers. Pursuant to the joint venture agreement, the Company’s partner holds an option to put its shares to a subsidiary of the Company at the higher of the current fair value or at a guaranteed minimum amount. The term of the contingent guarantee is indefinite, consistent with the terms of the joint venture agreement. However, the contingent guarantee would not survive termination of the joint venture agreement. The guaranteed minimum amount represents a contingent guarantee of the initial investment of the joint venture partner and can be exercised at the discretion of the partner. As of June 30, 2011, the total amount of the contingent guarantee, were all triggering events to occur, approximated $65 million. The Company believes that this contingent guarantee is substantially less than the estimated current fair value of the guarantees’ interest in the affiliate. As such, the contingent guarantee does not give rise to a contingent liability and, as a result, no amount is recorded for this guarantee. If this put option were exercised, the consideration paid and net assets acquired would be accounted for in accordance with business combination accounting guidance. Any value in excess of the guaranteed minimum amount of the put option would be the subject of negotiation between the Company and its joint venture partner.

Federal-Mogul subsidiaries in Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain and the United States are party to accounts receivable factoring and securitization facilities. Gross accounts receivable transferred under these facilities were $336 million and $211 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Of those gross amounts, $334 million and $210 million, respectively, qualify as sales as defined in ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. The remaining transferred receivables were pledged as collateral and accounted for as secured borrowings and recorded in the consolidated balance sheets within “Accounts receivable, net” and “Short-term debt, including current portion of long-term debt.” Under the terms of these facilities, the Company is not obligated to draw cash immediately upon the transfer of accounts receivable. Thus, as of both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding transferred receivables for which cash of $1 million had not yet been drawn. Proceeds from the transfers of accounts receivable qualifying as sales were $923 million and $629 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

ITEM 3. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no material changes to the information concerning the Company’s exposures to market risk as stated in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Refer to Note 4, “Financial Instruments,” to the consolidated financial statements for information with respect to interest rate risk, commodity price risk and foreign currency risk.

The translated values of revenue and expense from the Company’s international operations are subject to fluctuations due to changes in currency exchange rates. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company derived 36% of its sales in the United States and 64% internationally. Of these international sales, 38% are denominated in the euro, with no other single currency representing more than 5%. To minimize foreign currency risk, the Company generally maintains natural hedges within its non-U.S. activities, including the matching of operational revenues and costs. Where natural hedges are not in place, the Company manages certain aspects of its foreign currency activities and larger transactions through the use of foreign currency options or forward contracts. The Company estimates that a hypothetical 10% adverse movement of all foreign currencies in the same direction against the U.S. dollar over the six months ended June 30, 2011 would have decreased “Net income attributable to Federal-Mogul” by approximately $19 million.

The Company operates one manufacturing facility and one technical center in Japan. The Company did not experience any loss of property or other assets nor were any of its employees injured as a result of the natural disasters in that country during the first quarter of 2011. The Company does not currently anticipate any significant impacts to its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, either direct or indirect, as a result of this crisis, and will continue to carefully monitor the situation over the coming months.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s periodic Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of June 30, 2011, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011, at the reasonable assurance level previously described.

Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As of June 30, 2011, the Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated for disclosure, changes to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. There were no material changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

(a)	Contingencies.

Note 13, that is included in Part I of this report, is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 25, 2011, stockholders elected ten directors for a one-year term. The vote tabulation is as follows:


Nominee	For	Withheld
Carl C. Icahn	87,635,063	7,239,806
José Maria Alapont	86,844,792	8,030,077
George Feldenkreis	85,700,915	9,173,954
Vincent J. Intrieri	86,600,021	8,274,848
J. Michael Laisure	93,730,721	1,144,148
Samuel J. Merksamer	87,687,313	7,187,556
Daniel A. Ninivaggi	86,269,134	8,605,735
David S. Schechter	87,307,174	7,567,695
Neil S. Subin	85,701,057	9,173,812
James H. Vandenberghe	93,662,764	1,212,105

Stockholders approved the compensation of Federal-Mogul Corporation’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement. The vote tabulation is as follows:


For	Against	Abstain
92,556,344	437,973	1,880,552

Stockholders also approved a voting frequency of “EVERY YEAR” as the frequency with which stockholders provide an advisory vote on executive compensation of Federal-Mogul Corporation’s name executives. The vote tabulation is as follows:


1 Year	2 Years	3 Years	Abstain
91,858,686	99,598	1,062,741	1,853,844

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

(a)

Exhibits:


		31.1		Certification by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

		31.2		Certification by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

		32		Certification by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

		101		Financial statements from the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Federal-Mogul Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, filed on July 28, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations; (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (iv) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements furnished herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION

By: /s/ Alan J. Haughie

Alan J. Haughie

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,

Principal Financial Officer

By: /s/ Jérôme Rouquet

Jérôme Rouquet

Vice President, Controller, and Chief Accounting Officer

Principal Accounting Officer

Dated: July 28, 2011

Federal-Mogul Holdings LLC - FORM 10-Q - July 28, 2011

Attached files

Federal-Mogul Holdings LLC Reports

Also read