UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the year ended December 31, 2010

OR

o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from               to              .

Commission File Number 0-25882

EZENIA! INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

14 Celina Ave, Suite 17-18, Nashua, New Hampshire 03063

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(603) 589-7600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock $.01 par value

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act  Yes  o      No   x

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act            Yes  o      No   x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  x     No   o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes  o       No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.            R

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.     Large Accelerated Filer  *     Accelerated Filer  *             Non-Accelerated Filer o  Smaller Reporting Company   x

Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)  Yes  o      No   x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of June 30, 2010 was $3,111,614 (computed by reference to the price at which the Registrant’s common stock was last sold on the OTC Bulletin Board on June 30, 2010).

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock as of March 30, 2011 was 15,601,601.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to stockholders in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof. With the exception of the portion of such Proxy Statement that is expressly incorporated herein, such Proxy Statement shall not be deemed filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Ezenia! Inc.

2010 Form 10-K Annual Report

Table of Contents

The Company’s trademarks include Ezenia!, the Ezenia! Logo, InfoWorkSpace, LaunchPad, and Encounter.   All other trademarks referred to in this document are the property of their respective companies.

2

PART I

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.  Certain factors that might cause such a difference are discussed in this report, including in Item 1A “Risk Factors” beginning on page 9.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

Founded in 1991, Ezenia! Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Ezenia”, “we”, or the “Company”), develops and markets products that enable organizations to provide technically advanced high-quality group communication to commercial, governmental, consumer and institutional users. Our products allow individuals and groups, regardless of proximity constraints, to interact and share information in a natural, spontaneous way — voice-to-voice, face-to-face, mouse-to-mouse, or keyboard-to-keyboard flexibly, securely and in real time. Using our products, individuals can interact through a natural meeting experience, allowing groups to work together effectively and disseminate vital information quickly in an extremely secure manner using advanced technology for both network security and data encryption.

We offer one of the most comprehensive commercially available lines of group communication products.  Our InfoWorkSpace software product enables voice communication, secure messaging, white boarding, virtual workspaces, and JPEG-based video across a wide range of networks including local area networks, and wide area networks.  Furthermore, because our products are well suited for operating from small enclave environments to large multi-node public networks, they can be deployed with relative ease at small sites or in locations with a large number of users.

InfoWorkSpace and related services have been sold to customers in the federal government, mostly in the Department of Defense (“DoD”) and the intelligence community, either directly, or in many instances, in partnership with defense contractors and/or integrators.  We believe that it is in our interest to leverage these partnerships with well-established contractors and/or integrators to further expand deployment and provide  support for InfoWorkSpace in large-scale opportunities.

Company Background and Evolution — True Collaboration versus Videoconferencing

In 1991, Ezenia, known at the time as VideoServer, designed, developed, manufactured, and sold Multipoint Control Systems or Units (“MCS” or “MCU”) for both circuit-oriented, Integrated Services Digital Network based and packet-switched, Internet Protocol-based videoconferencing applications. Our MCS was unique at the time with its PC-based, flexible hardware design approach and system configurations, leveraging commercial off-the-shelf operating systems.  At that time, traditional videoconferencing vendors concentrated mostly on the development of more and more sophisticated, standards-based endpoints to be used in point-to-point videoconferencing.  We focused our business not on the endpoints, but on systems deployed in the infrastructure backroom, to enable three or more sites or parties involved in videoconferencing to properly communicate among themselves, by switching video sources based on audio processing of current and immediately preceding speakers. Our technical advantages were derived by masking and compensating for incompatibilities between endpoints from different manufacturers, algorithmic transcoding, compensation for different bandwidth requirements, and simultaneous multi-windowed video arrangements on the monitor known as “Hollywood Squares,” just to name a few.

In the late 1990’s, we fully realized the limitations and narrow applications of our videoconferencing products which, among many deficiencies, were monolithic, required highly specialized support and services, stood apart from the normal office environment that most information workers were accustomed to, and did not fulfill the need to truly collaborate and disseminate information in real time.

3

In March 2001, we completed the first phase of our business transformation with the acquisition of the InfoWorkSpace business from General Dynamics.  As an application solution and technology built on top of Placeware’s (see “Third-Party Technology” below) web conferencing technology, InfoWorkSpace:

·                  Allows users to be aware of the online presence of colleagues, enables true multimedia collaboration sessions starting with the simplest secure information messaging (keyboard-to-keyboard) and expanding to the most complex all-encompassing (mouse-to-mouse) sharing and dissemination of mission critical information simultaneously with in-session, super-imposed audio conferencing and/or JPEG-based video;

·                  Leverages commercial off-the-shelf base operating systems such as  Windows and Solaris; and

·                  Fits into the virtual office environment with which most information workers are familiar.

We believe that the use and growth of real-time collaborative technologies within commercial or governmental enterprises is increasing.  Investments in information and collaborative technologies helps customers flatten their organizations, improve enterprise wide communication, shorten the decision-making process, and facilitate real-time reactions to critical issues.  Rather than just providing access to inert data stored on a server, the goal today is to find ways to enable information workers to collaborate and share their expertise  in real-time and in a secure environment.  Collaborative technologies are about creating informational value through better, faster and more efficient human interaction and cooperation, not just more data.  Businesses and governmental organizations today need solutions that make it easier for people to work together, share information and expertise, and coordinate activities across departments, networks, agencies, building complexes, facilities spread all over the country, and field deployments around the world.

Products

Our expertise is in developing products that deliver highly secure and flexible support for informational collaboration, in-session audio conferencing, and video streaming capabilities across a wide range of platforms.  Our products have been designed with a scalable, modular architecture to give customers the flexibility to add capacity, processing power, and conferencing features as the customer network and application requirements grow. Using a common set of hardware and software building blocks, customers can choose from a wide range of product configurations that differ in capacity, price, network connectivity and features, all of which share the same operating software user interface. We believe a key differentiator for our products is built-in robust security features, which allows them to be installed in some of the most secure environments in the market.

InfoWorkSpace

InfoWorkSpace is a comprehensive suite of collaboration applications designed to allow any organization to more efficiently communicate, particularly when attempting to work as, and within, a group.  From an overall perspective, InfoWorkSpace, when used effectively, can reduce or even eliminate dependency on travel, traditional video conferencing, traditional audio conferencing and the phone, and even e-mail and file servers.  Essentially, InfoWorkSpace presents and enables a corporate campus or enterprise whose resources can be accessed by an information worker through his or her own desktop or laptop PC.  Users can browse through the virtual campus, facility, or building to locate the room to be used for a meeting, or just pick the needed contact(s) and initiate the meeting with the click of the mouse.

Our customers, including the U.S. intelligence community and the U.S. Air Force, have leveraged the flexibility of InfoWorkSpace to aid in a myriad of missions.  From daily mission briefs to operational support in Afghanistan and Iraq, InfoWorkSpace has increasingly become a vital part of the U.S. defense network.  The stability, scalability and security of InfoWorkSpace allow our customers to depend on our software to complete mission-critical assignments and save lives in some of the world’s most dangerous areas.

InfoWorkSpace is a cross-platform solution in a box, supporting both UNIX and Windows-based operating systems. A standard software suite comes complete with our server software package, database, application server, and user directory along with a number of ancillary add-ons. This suite provides a self-sufficient workgroup environment for a user base of up to several thousands of users. However, with a few simple system configurations, InfoWorkSpace servers can be arranged in such a way that multiple servers can trust one another in order to support collaboration across an enterprise with an even larger number of participants.

4

The InfoWorkSpace security infrastructure is built upon current industry best practices and standards. Much like a UNIX administrator can restrict access to a directory or file to a limited set of users, InfoWorkSpace administrators can lock rooms down to prevent users from seeing sensitive data that is outside their area of responsibility.  Permission-based access allows administrators to finely tune a user’s access profile to the file level.  Data can be encrypted using standard SSL protocols and access can be controlled with PKI and X.509 certificates; our PKI/PKE implementation has been certified by the Joint Interoperability Test Center in Fort Huachuca, Arizona.

The stability, scalability, flexibility and security capabilities of InfoWorkSpace are critically important for our customers, but the true power of InfoWorkSpace is in its collaboration applications.  Users can participate in an interactive conference with absolutely no set up procedures.  This is a significant leap forward from where the industry was just a few years ago, using videoconferences as the only interactive medium.  InfoWorkSpace eliminates the need to have a heavy piece of hardware at each terminal point of collaboration, to schedule a conference with a bridge operator, or to have a whole new network infrastructure to support an interactive conferencing capability.  Once logged into InfoWorkSpace, information workers can initiate a conference by going to a virtual room and inviting the participants as needed.  Rooms are either pre-defined or created on demand. Once inside a room, either by joining or being invited into a session, participants can have an audio conference straight from the software. With InfoWorkSpace, no set up is required and no additional cost is incurred.  Participants can even be in multiple rooms at the same time, offering a more productive virtual environment than in the physical world. Participants can share and work on documents from the file cabinet associated with a room.  Users can have an interactive whiteboard session and save the results. Users also can manage their calendars, participate in message boards and save that information to the server where they can access it at any time from any place.

A high-level summary of InfoWorkSpace features and functions is listed below:

·              Information messaging, in a one-to-one arrangement, in a conference environment, or in multiple combinations of one-on-one and/or conference environments;

·              Audio conversation and conferencing, in a one-to-one arrangement, in a conference environment, or in multiple combinations of one-on-one and/or conference environments;

·              Interactive whiteboard which all users can see and modify in real time;

·              Application sharing which allows the screen view of any application on any desktop or laptop PC of any information worker to be broadcasted to all other participants;

·              Secure file cabinet, from which permission-based access allows documents to be stored, retrieved, and monitored at any time from any place;

·              EZinFORM, a forms manager designed for an agency to document a task order where multiple sites and people are deployed on a mission that requires rapid updates to critical events;

·              EZinCMD, a unit command toll that can consolidate views and people into a critical command and control battlefield situation for rapid response;

·              Multi-Level security, which allows users of one security level to have real-time collaboration sessions with users at another security level with the use of the DIA-certified Information Support Server Environment (ISSE) Guard;

·              SSL and PKI encryption, which, when configured, renders traffic secure across the wire;

·              Full system auditing, which allows all data and actions to be audited and searchable;

·              Informal meetings, a lightweight application that provides all interactive capabilities;

·              Virtual campuses, buildings, offices and persistent meetings, a robust all-encompassing application that provides rich, secure, scalable, real-time collaborative capabilities and recreates the office environment with facilities like a file cabinet, document storage and retrieval message board, and calendaring; and

·              Virtual auditorium-style meetings with geographically dispersed presenter panels and large audiences, coupled with fully functional multimedia presentations and recordings, including in-band audio, as well as seating control and assignment, private sidebar discussions, moderator control, and audience Q&A sessions.

5

MxM Secure

In May 2010 we announced our new MxM Secure software product dedicated to real-time secure messaging and information sharing for both the commercial and federal markets.   MxM Secure is the culmination of over four years of development and incorporates our knowledge and experience into an intuitive, secure and elegant product for both marketplaces.  The lessons we have learned from our deployment of our flagship product line, InfoWorkSpace, for use by the DoD and intelligence agencies was leveraged at every possible opportunity in the creation of MxM Secure.  Architected and designed from the ground up, MxM Secure provides granular depth and flexible breadth of data protection and audit capabilities with extensive security capabilities as robust as in InfoWorkSpace.  However, MxM Secure is optimized for simplicity of use, user configurable graphical interface, adaptable configuration of functionality, and ease of deployment either on premise or hosted models of deployment/use.

MxM Secure is an ideal fit for organizations that want to communicate and collaborate in real time but need to satisfy regulatory compliance or for those organizations with a keen and urgent interest in securing company information such as trade secrets, sensitive negotiations, corporate policies, privacy concerns, and/or protection of their corporate digital reputation.

Market and Channels

InfoWorkSpace and MxM Secure products and services are licensed on an annual subscription and renewal basis, during which software updates and basic technical support are included as part of base offerings. Enhanced service offerings are also offered in a subscription model. Training, installation, and customization are sold on an “as needed” basis.

The worldwide government marketplace is best understood as a matrix of customers, sales vehicles (contracts), and sales channels.  We employ a sales model which is an analog to this government market matrix. InfoWorkSpace products and related services are available to specific segments of the government using various vehicles, including our GSA Schedule and multiple channels both directly, with our own sales force, and indirectly with partners such as General Dynamics, Harris Corporation, DRC, and Northrop Grumman.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, approximately 76% of our sales of InfoWorkSpace and related services were through our indirect channels. Our top end-user customers for InfoWorkSpace products and related services in 2009 and 2010 were the Armed Forces, intelligence and security agencies. Sales to these customers accounted for approximately 63%, 13% and 13%, respectively, of total revenue in 2010, and 56%, 16% and 6%, respectively, of total revenue in 2009.

We conduct our sales and marketing activities from our principal offices in Nashua, New Hampshire, and Sterling, Virginia.

Research and Product Development

We believe that future success depends on our ability to continue to enhance and expand our existing enterprise collaboration products and to develop new products that maintain our technology leadership. We have invested and will continue to invest in the development of products and core technologies while also leveraging the integration of “best-of-breed” software components through strategic partnerships. Extensive product development input is obtained via direct feedback from end-users and suggested improvements from strategic partners and resellers.  We carefully monitor the migration of industry standards and remain committed to developing products utilizing such standards.  This includes the development of interoperable collaboration products to meet either industry needs and/or DoD-driven interoperability criteria, while maintaining a keen focus on the security aspects of enterprise collaboration, including solutions in the web conferencing arena.

6

As of December 31, 2010, our research and development staff consisted primarily of software engineers augmented with U.S.-based and U.S.-citizen software contractors. Many of our software engineers carry either secret or top-secret levels of security clearance. Our research and development expenditures were approximately $1.0 million and $1.7 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively, representing approximately 37% and 49% of revenue, respectively.

Costs that are incurred internally in researching and developing computer software products are charged to expense until technological feasibility has been established. Once technological feasibility is established, all software costs are capitalized until the product is available for general release to customers.

Judgment is required in determining when technological feasibility of a product is established. In most cases, we have determined that technological feasibility for our software products and updates is reached shortly before the products are released to manufacturing.  With the exception of InfoWorkSpace version 3.0 released in 2006 and the MxM Secure product released in 2010, costs incurred after technological feasibility have historically not been material, and accordingly, have been expensed when incurred.

Customer Support and Service

We provide technical support and services to our resellers and direct customers. A high level of continuing service and support is critical to our objective of developing long-lasting relationships with customers and partners. Our partners and resellers offer a broad range of support including installation, maintenance and on-site and headquarters-level technical support of products to their end-user customers. We provide a comprehensive service program, including problem management, training, diagnostic tools, software updates and upgrades, as well as spare parts programs to facilitate and supplement the efforts of our partners and resellers.

We offer a technical support hotline to our resellers and customers, which is staffed by our network engineers who generally provide either immediate or same-day responses to most questions. As our products have built-in remote diagnostic capabilities, most problems can be diagnosed without incurring travel expenses for on-site visits. When necessary, however, support engineers are dispatched to the customer’s facility for critical situations. All of our support engineers carry various levels of security clearance.

Third-Party Technology

We license technology from third parties, including software which is integrated with internally developed software and used in our products to perform key functions.  There can be no assurance that functionally similar technology will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future, or at all.  In particular, in April 2007 we entered into a new agreement with Microsoft Corporation, with an effective date of January 1, 2007, to extend an existing software distribution license agreement through December 2008. This agreement was subsequently amended to, among other things, extend the payment terms through June 2011. The software distribution license agreement allows us to integrate Microsoft’s Live Communication software into our InfoWorkSpace product line.  We are currently in discussions with Microsoft Corporation for activities after June 2011 and have agreed in principal to an extension of the agreement for three years once the 2011 payment schedule has been completed.

Competition

The market for multimedia collaboration is an emerging segment with new vendors entering the competitive landscape and old vendors from existing industries. Furthermore, multimedia collaboration can also be grouped into two main groups: real-time synchronous solutions and asynchronous products.  While most vendors adopt the client-server architecture, some insist on the merit of peer-to-peer. Many large vendors offer both types of products. From another perspective, vendors could be classified into two classes of providers: the first group provides customer-premise solutions while the second implements a hosted environment.

7

Even though our business primarily focuses on the real-time synchronous, client-server, customer-premise market segment within the government, depending upon the possible perspectives, various vendors could be considered as likely competitors, including Adobe, Cisco, EMC, IBM, and Oracle, in this intensely contested market segment.  Many of these companies, as well as other current and potential competitors, have substantially greater financial, technical, and sales and marketing resources than us. If we are unable to retain our existing customers in the U.S. government, or are unable to convince a sufficient number of new companies or customers with an interest in collaborative technologies to adopt our InfoWorkSpace collaborative software product over alternative technologies marketed by our competitors, our financial results will suffer through price reductions and loss of market share.

The principal competitive factors in the market for multimedia collaboration are security, scalability, reliability, price, performance, network management capabilities, integration, breadth of capabilities, customer support and interoperability. We plan to compete by offering the best-of-breed enterprise solutions encompassing all of these factors.  However, we cannot be certain that potential customers will be attracted to our products, especially if our competitors invest substantially more money into their products and technology.

Proprietary Rights

We rely on a combination of contractual rights, trade secrets and copyright laws to establish and protect our intellectual property rights. We believe that, because of the rapid pace of technological change in the data communications and telecommunications industries, intellectual property protection for our products is only one factor in our success, complementing the knowledge, abilities and experience of our employees, the frequency of our product enhancements, our relationships with our partners, our relationships with our customers and their satisfaction with the performance of InfoWorkSpace, the effectiveness of our marketing activities, and the responsiveness and quality of our services.

Employees

At December 31, 2010, we employed 25  people on a full-time basis.  In March 2011, in response to our financial condition, we reduced our headcount from 25 employees to 13 employees.  None of our employees is represented by a labor organization.

Our success depends, to a significant degree, upon the continuing contributions of our key management, sales, marketing and research and development personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace, including Khoa Nguyen, our Chief Executive Officer and Peter Janke, our President.  We do not carry key-man life insurance on any of our employees, including Mr. Nguyen and Mr. Janke.  We do not have employment contracts with our key personnel other than Mr. Nguyen. We believe that our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract additional key employees and retain our key employees.

Availability of Filings

You may access, free of charge, through our website at www.ezenia.com, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to such reports, all filed pursuant to Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this document and should not be considered a part of this report.  Our website address is included in this document as an inactive textual reference only.

8

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones that we face.  Additional risks and uncertainties of which we are unaware, or that we currently deem immaterial, also may become important factors that affect us in the future.  If any of these risks were to occur, our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.  This section includes or refers to certain forward-looking statements; you should read the explanation of the qualifications and limitations on such forward-looking statements found in the section captioned “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Our declining revenue over the past several years combined with our recent history of operating losses and low balance of cash on hand have raised substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our declining revenue over the past several years combined with our operating losses over the past several years and our cash balance of only $1.8 million as of December 31, 2010, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  As a result, our independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph in its report on our financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 with respect to this uncertainty.  If we are unable to generate sufficient income from our operations, our ability to continue as a going concern will require us to obtain additional financing to fund our operations.  The perception of our ability to continue as a going concern may make it more difficult for us to obtain financing for the continuation of our operations and could result in the loss of confidence by investors, suppliers and employees.

We may be unable to return to profitability and may need to raise additional capital to fund continuing operations.  If we do not return to profitability or our financing efforts are not successful, we may not be able to continue our operations.

We experienced a net loss of approximately $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 and as of December 31, 2010, had cash and cash equivalents on hand of approximately $1.8 million.  Management believes that its existing cash and cash equivalents, expected renewals and new business are sufficient to fund operations for the next 12 months. However, we can provide no assurances that we will obtain sufficient renewals or new businesses to return the business to profitability, especially since we have experienced net losses and decreasing cash balances over the past several years.  If we are unable to return to profitability through our marketing and sales efforts, or if unanticipated circumstances arise which could result in our needing additional capital sooner than anticipated, such as unexpected costs associated with our product development and sales and marketing efforts, we will be required to find additional financing sources.  There is no assurance that financing will be available from any source, that it will be available on terms acceptable to us, or that any future offering of securities will be successful. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, there may be a significant dilution in the value of our outstanding common stock.  If we need to raise additional funds, but are unable to do so, we may be required to curtail or cease our operations.

Adverse economic and market conditions may result in further budgetary constraints within the defense and intelligence communities, as well as a downturn in spending on real-time collaboration solutions by other users, that could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.

Unfavorable changes in economic and market conditions, including inflation, recession, or other changes, may result in further budgetary constraints on governmental users, and lower spending by commercial, consumer and institutional users of real-time collaboration solutions. If demand for real-time collaboration products declines significantly, or government or corporate spending for those products declines, our business, results of operations, and financial condition would be adversely affected. Challenging economic conditions also may impair the ability of our customers to pay for products and services they have purchased. There is no assurance that, if operations were to deteriorate and additional financing were to become necessary, we would be able to obtain financing in amounts sufficient to meet operating requirements or at terms which are satisfactory and which allow us to remain competitive.

9

The continued redirection of budget funds and increased competition within our Department of Defense customer base would negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.

We believe our revenue has declined due to redirections of the IT budget by the Defense Information Systems Agency (the “DISA”) to competing solutions selected for the Net-Centric Enterprise Services (“NCES”) programs.  While we believe that there are potential opportunities for limited recovery and new sales in our existing DoD customer base, we will continue to face severe difficulties in this market due to such redirection of budget funds and the promotion of competing solutions by the DISA, including a collaborative product being sponsored and offered free by the DISA to these customers.

A significant portion of our revenue is attributable to a small number of major customers, none of whom is obligated to continue to use our products and services.

While we are focusing efforts on broadening our customer base, sales to a relatively small number of customers within the U.S. government, specifically within the DoD and the intelligence community, have accounted for a significant portion of revenue.  Sales to our top three customers accounted for approximately 63%, 13% and 13%, respectively, of total revenue in 2010, and 56%, 16% and 6%, respectively, of total revenue in 2009. This concentration of customers may cause revenue and operating results to fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on major customers’ requirements, and the timing of their orders and shipments. Our agreements with customers generally do not include minimum purchase commitments or exclusivity arrangements. Our operating results could be materially and adversely affected if any present major customer were to reduce its level of orders, change to another vendor, realize a reduction in approved funding for collaborative technologies, or delay paying or fail to pay amounts due to us.

Loss of access to certain third-party technology utilized in our products could materially harm our business.

We utilize certain technology which we license from third parties, including software which is integrated with internally developed software, and use in our products to perform key functions.  There can be no assurance that functionally similar technology will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms in the future, or at all.  In April 2007, we entered into a new agreement with Microsoft Corporation to extend an existing software distribution license agreement through December 2008. This agreement was subsequently amended to, among other things, extend its payment terms through June 2011. This software distribution license agreement allows us to integrate Microsoft’s Live Communication software with our proprietary software, to create InfoWorkSpace.  Loss of access to this third-party technology, whether due to termination or expiration of the agreement with Microsoft or the failure to renew the agreement, would result in material harm to our business and results of operations. We are currently in discussions with Microsoft Corporation for activities after June 2011 and have agreed in principal to an extension of the agreement for three years once the 2011 payment schedule has been completed.

Our success depends upon market acceptance of our collaboration products.

Sales of real-time collaboration products account for all of our revenue. As a result, our success depends on the acceptance and the rate of adoption of Internet-based collaboration products, in general, and our InfoWorkSpace product, in particular.  We can provide no assurance that any of the markets for our products will develop to the extent, in the manner, or at the rate anticipated by us.  In particular, while our sales have historically been within certain organizations of the U.S. government and intelligence community, we are pursuing the sale of our products in the commercial market as well.  There can be no assurance of success in the commercial market for InfoWorkSpace and MxM Secure, or other products that we may introduce in 2011 or beyond. In addition, future prices that we are able to obtain for our products may decrease as a result of new product introductions by others, price competition, technological change or other factors.

10

If we are unable to adapt to the rapid pace of change in our market, our business could be adversely affected.

Our market is characterized by changing technology, emerging industry standards, evolving network developments and product introductions.  The adoption rate of new technologies and products may adversely impact near-term growth of the conferencing market as users evaluate the alternatives.  For 2011 we plan to continue investments in the enhancement and development of our current and new products to address the evolving technology landscape.  Our success will depend, in part, upon our ability to maintain technological leadership through continued investments, to enhance our existing product offerings, and to develop new products that achieve market acceptance.

Our results of operations would suffer if we are unable to effectively compete in the market for multimedia collaboration products.

The market for multimedia collaboration products is highly competitive. A number of companies have introduced competitive products. Furthermore, the market may attract new entrants. Some competitors have longer operating histories and greater financial, technical, sales, and marketing resources.  If we were unable to retain our existing customers, or convince a sufficient number of new customers to adopt our collaborative software products over competitive alternatives, our financial results would suffer.

The principal competitive factors in the market for multimedia collaboration are, and are expected to continue to be, breadth of capabilities, demonstrated interoperability, price, performance, network management capabilities, reliability, scalability, customer support and security.  We plan to compete by offering collaboration and enterprise products with a broad range of capabilities and high performance.  However, we cannot be certain that potential customers will be attracted to our products, especially if competitors were to invest substantially more money into their products and technology.

If we release products containing defects or experience delays in releasing new products, our competitive position could be adversely effected.

As part of our strategy, we expect to release new products and new versions of our existing products.  Even if our new versions of existing products contain the features and functionality that our customers desire, if we are unable to timely introduce these new products or product releases, our competitive position will be harmed.  We can provide no assurances that we will be able to successfully complete the development of currently planned or future products or product releases in a timely manner or at all.  Also, due to the complexity of our products, internal quality assurance testing and customer testing of pre-commercial releases may reveal product performance issues or desirable product enhancements that could cause delays in development and release of future products or current upgrades of our existing products.

We may be unsuccessful in protecting our intellectual property rights which could result in the loss of a competitive advantage.

Our ability to compete effectively against other companies in our industry depends, in part, on our ability to protect our current and future proprietary technology under patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret and unfair competition laws. We cannot assure that our means of protecting our proprietary rights in the United States or abroad will be adequate, or that others will not develop technologies similar or superior to our technology or design around our proprietary rights. In addition, we may incur substantial costs in attempting to protect our proprietary rights.

Also, we may become subject to claims that we infringe the intellectual property rights of others in the future. We cannot assure that, if made, these claims will not be successful. Any claim of infringement could cause us to incur substantial costs defending against the claim even if the claim is invalid, and could distract management from other business. Any judgment against us could require substantial payment in damages and could also include an injunction or other court order that could prevent us from offering certain products.

11

The loss of or failure to retain or attract talented directors, officers and personnel could harm our business.

Our success depends, to a significant degree, upon the continuing contributions of our key management, sales, marketing, and research and development personnel, some of whom would be difficult to replace, including Khoa Nguyen, our Chief Executive Officer and Peter Janke, our President.  We do not carry key-man life insurance on any of our employees, including Mr. Nguyen and Mr. Janke.  We do not have employment contracts with our key personnel other than Mr. Nguyen. We believe that our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to retain and attract such key employees.

As the result of our diminishing financial resources, our workforce has been reduced by approximately one-half since December 31, 2006, from 47 to 25 as of December 31, 2010, and in March 2011, we further reduced our headcount from 25 employees to 13 employees.  As a result, our ability to continue many activities has been impaired, which in turn may prevent or further delay our return to profitability and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Moreover, we have five directors on our Board of Directors, three of whom meet the standards for independence as specified by the SEC and the national stock exchanges.  Historically, we have strived to have an audit committee comprised of at least three independent directors, as required by the national stock exchanges.  Currently, we have three directors serving on our audit committee. We are continuing in our attempts to identify additional qualified individuals to serve as independent directors.  However, highly-qualified individuals may not be available or willing to serve as directors and there can be no assurance that we will be able to identify, recruit and ultimately secure the services of such individuals in a timely manner or at all.

The trading price of our common stock may continue to be volatile, which may adversely affect our business, and investors in our common stock may experience substantial losses.

The market price of our common stock, like that of other technology companies, is highly volatile and is subject to wide fluctuations in response to quarterly variations in operating results, or other events or factors.  Our stock price may also be affected by broader market trends unrelated to our performance.  Due to this volatility, investors in our common stock may experience substantial losses.

Our common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, making it a less liquid investment than if it were traded on a national securities exchange.

The shares of our common stock were delisted from The Nasdaq National Market in August 2003 and are now traded on the OTC Bulletin Board. As a result, an investor may find it more difficult to dispose of our stock due to low trading volume or obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our stock. In addition, we are subject to Rule 15c2-11 promulgated by the SEC (“Rule 15c2-11”). If we fail to meet criteria set forth in such rule (for example, by failing to file periodic reports as required by the Exchange Act), various practice requirements are imposed on broker-dealers who sell securities governed by Rule 15c2-11 to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. For these types of transactions, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transactions prior to sale. Consequently, Rule 15c2-11 may have a material adverse effect on the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities, which may materially affect the ability of stockholders to sell the securities in the secondary market. The listing of our securities on the OTC Bulletin Board may make it more difficult for investors to trade in our securities, which could lead to further declines in our share price. Trading our shares on the OTC Bulletin Board also makes it more difficult for us to raise additional capital, as we may incur additional costs under state blue sky laws if we were to sell additional securities.

12

Provisions of Delaware law, our charter and by-laws may make a takeover more difficult.

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and by-laws and of Delaware corporate law may make it difficult and expensive for a third party to pursue a tender offer, change in control or takeover attempt that is opposed by our management and Board of Directors. We also have a staggered board of directors that makes it difficult for stockholders to change the composition of our board of directors in any one year. These anti-takeover provisions could impede the ability of public stockholders to change our management and Board of Directors.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

Our corporate office and principal research, development and manufacturing facility is located in Nashua, New Hampshire, in an approximately 6,000 square foot facility.  We currently lease this facility pursuant to a lease agreement that is scheduled to expire in 2012. We also have a sales office located in Sterling, Virginia, which we lease pursuant to a lease agreement that is scheduled to expire in 2013.  During 2007, we completed our consolidation of our Colorado Springs and Nashua facilities in Nashua, New Hampshire.  We believe these our existing office spaces are adequate for our current needs and that additional or replacement space will be available on commercially reasonable terms as needed.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. We believe that the outcomes of these matters will not have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial position or financial results.

ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED).

13

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Since 2003, our common stock has been quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, under the symbol “EZEN.OB”.  The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low bid or sale prices per share of our common stock as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board.

As of March 16, 2010, we had approximately 112 stockholders of record. This does not reflect persons or entities that hold their stock in nominee or “street” name through various brokerage firms. We have not paid dividends on our common stock and we anticipate that we will reinvest future earnings, if any, and therefore, do not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

See Part III, Item 12 for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our audited consolidated financial statements.

(1)          2007 amounts include a charge of $1.45 million to reserve for excess purchase commitments under the Microsoft license agreement, which was recorded as a component of cost of product revenue, and income tax expense of $711,000 related to an increase in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets recorded in 2006 and 2005.

(2)          2006 amounts include a tax benefit of $513,000, or $0.04 per share, related to a reduction in the valuation allowance associated with deferred tax assets of approximately $579,000 offset by approximately $66,000 of current federal and state tax expense.

14

Quarterly financial information (unaudited)

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Safe Harbor For Forward Looking Statements

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the MD&A,, and other information provided by us or statements made by our directors, officers or employees from time to time, may contain “forward-looking” statements and information, which involve risks and uncertainties.  Statements indicating that we “expect,” “estimate,” “believe,” “are planning,” or “plan to,” are forward-looking, as are other statements concerning our business focus, strategic initiatives, product development initiatives, new product launches, changes in the competitive landscape, business and industry trends, future financial results, expense control initiatives, changes in and maintenance of our customer base and the potential development of new business, changes in our relationship with Microsoft and related purchase commitment reserve, our ability to generate cash and to meet our working capital needs, and other events that have not yet occurred. These forward-looking statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to, our ability to maintain or accurately forecast revenue growth or to anticipate and accurately forecast a decline in revenue from any of our products or services, customer acceptance of our InfoWorkSpace and MxM Secure Products, our ability to compete in an intensely competitive market, our ability to develop and introduce new products or product enhancements on schedule and that respond to customer requirements and rapid technological change, our dependence on the U.S. government as our largest customer, budgetary constraints within the defense and intelligence communities or the redirection of such budgeted funds, new product introductions and product enhancements by competitors, our ability to select and implement appropriate business models, plans and strategies and to execute on them, our ability to identify, hire, train, motivate, and retain highly qualified management/other key personnel and our ability to manage changes and transitions in management/other key personnel, the impact of global economic and political conditions on our business, and unauthorized use or misappropriation of our intellectual property, as well as the risk factors discussed in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any such statement to reflect any change in our expectations or in events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such statements may be based, or that may affect the likelihood that actual results will differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements.

15

Overview

For the year ended December 31, 2010, overall revenue decreased approximately 24% when compared to the year ended December 31, 2009.  The reduction in revenue is primarily attributed to a decrease in renewals and sales from certain DoD customers as well as budgetary consolidations and the promotion of competing solutions by the DISA, including a collaborative product being sponsored and offered for free by the DISA to these customers.   As a result, we experienced an operating loss of $2.9 million and a net loss of approximately $2.8 million in 2010 compared to an operating loss of $3.5 million and a net loss of approximately $3.4 million in 2009, resulting in a loss of $0.18 per share in 2010, compared to a loss of $0.23 per share in 2009.

Revenue relating to our InfoWorkSpace product decreased approximately 24% in 2010 compared to 2009.  Gross profit also declined approximately 23% compared to 2009, but the gross profit percentage increased slightly to 62.0% in 2010 as compared to 61.8% in 2009. Operating expenses decreased $1.2 million to $4.5 million for 2010, as compared to $5.7 million for 2009. The decrease in our operating expenses in 2010 was a result of further spending reductions and belt-tightening measures in all areas of the company in response to declining revenue. Our other income decreased year over year as we saw a decrease in investment gains and a decrease in our interest earned, due to lower interest rates and a lower average cash balance.

In 2007, we entered into a new agreement with Microsoft to extend an existing software distribution license agreement through December 2008.  Under the agreement, we were required to purchase a minimum of $1.7 million of licenses during 2007 and $2.75 million during 2008, plus an additional $0.5 million over the life of the two year agreement. During 2007, we reviewed our forecast for license sales over the balance of the agreement and recorded a charge of $1.45 million to reserve for an excess purchase commitment.  The charge was recorded as a component of cost of product revenue during the year ended December 31, 2007.

In December 2008, the Microsoft agreement was amended to extend the term through June 2011 and reduce the remaining purchase commitment to $2.75 million; $2.1 million of which has been satisfied to date.  The amended agreement requires that we make additional payments of $0.7 million during 2011.  In addition to the remaining $0.7 million license purchase commitment, we have approximately $1.6 million of prepaid licenses on hand that have yet to be deployed to customers.  During 2010, we continued to experience a decline in the volume of our customer license renewals, and in early 2011, we entered into negotiations with Microsoft to extend the term of the Microsoft agreement.  Microsoft has tentatively agreed to allow us an additional three year period to deploy the prepaid licenses once the 2011 payment schedule has been completed. We reviewed our current forecast for license sales and believe that the $1.45 million reserve remains the appropriate reserve for the excess purchase commitment.  The prepaid licenses as of December 31, 2010, along with payments to be made in 2011, net of the reserve, represent inventory that is expected to be used in meeting license renewals and new business license requests.  The computation of the excess purchase commitment reserve requires management to make certain assumptions regarding future license renewals and sales growth.  Actual results may differ materially from management’s estimates.

16

Although our revenue has declined as a result of the redirections of IT budget by the DISA, coupled with the current difficult economic conditions which lengthen the business development and sales activities on the commercial segment, our immediate focus is to continue to enhance our existing various collaborative product and service offerings and to develop and ultimately deploy the next generation of products and services via aggressive and concentrated sales, service, engineering, and marketing efforts. We plan to continue to vigorously defend and endeavor to protect our customer base within the military and intelligence community, while pursuing new opportunities with various agencies and first responders dealing with the threat of terrorism and natural disasters, as well as emerging commercial applications. This focus is subject to change as the driving influence in our future direction is based on the needs and requirements of our customer base, both current and future, and may be adversely affected by current economic and market conditions, as well as our financial position.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, bad debts, inventories, income taxes and warranty obligations. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies and the related judgments and estimates affect the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Product revenue consists of sales of InfoWorkSpace software licenses and maintenance agreements, InfoWorkSpace product related training, installation, and consulting. Revenue from sales of InfoWorkSpace software license and maintenance agreements is recognized ratably over the subscription software license contract periods, which are generally one year. Revenue from InfoWorkSpace training, installation, and consulting services are recognized as the services are performed, provided there is vendor specific objective evidence of fair value, which is the price charged when the services are sold separately

Product development revenue relates to contracts involving customization of the InfoWorkSpace product according to a customer’s specifications. When reliable estimates are available for the costs and efforts necessary to complete the product development and the contract does not include contractual milestones or other acceptance criteria, product development revenue is recognized under the percentage-of-completion contract method based upon input measures, such as hours.  When such estimates are not available, we defer all revenue recognition until we have completed the contract and have no further obligations to the customer.  Revenue associated with contracts for product development revenue with milestone-based deliverables requiring a customer’s acceptance is recognized upon the customer’s acceptance in accordance with the terms of the contract.  The associated cost recognition with these deliverables or milestones is deferred until the terms of acceptance are satisfied and revenue is recognized. Certain of our product development contracts are subject to government audit and retroactive adjustment of the direct and indirect costs used to determine the contract billings.  Product development revenue and accounts receivable reported in the financial statements are recorded at the amount expected to be received.  Product development revenue is adjusted to actual upon final audit and retroactive adjustment.  Estimated contractual allowances are provided based on management’s evaluation of current contract terms.

Products and software licenses are sold without any contractual right of return by the customer.  Deferred revenue represents amounts received from customers under subscription software licenses, maintenance agreements, or for product sales in advance of revenue recognition.  Judgments are required in evaluating the creditworthiness of our customers.  In all instances, revenue is not recognized until we have evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.  Amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling charges are recorded upon shipment and the related costs are included in cost of goods sold.

17

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Our policy is to maintain allowances for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. Credit limits are established through a process of reviewing the financial history and stability of each customer. Where appropriate, we obtain credit rating reports and financial statements of the customer when determining or modifying their credit limits. We regularly evaluate the collectability of our trade receivable balances based on a combination of factors. When a customer’s account balance becomes past due, we initiate dialogue with the customer to determine the cause. If it is determined that the customer will be unable to meet its financial obligation to us, such as in the case of a bankruptcy filing, deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position, or other material events impacting the customer’s business, we record a specific allowance to reduce the related receivable to the amount we expect to recover given all information presently available.

At December 31, 2010, our accounts receivable balance was approximately $374,000 with no allowances. We do not believe an allowance is required. If the financial conditions of our customers were to deteriorate, however, resulting in their inability to make payments, we may need to record additional allowances, which would result in additional expenses being recorded for the period in which such determination was made.

Accounting for Share-Based Compensation

We have stock option plans that provide for the purchase of our common stock by certain of our employees, directors, and advisory board members. We recognize compensation expense for our share-based payments based on the fair value of the awards. Share-based payments include stock option grants under our stock option plans.

The determination of the fair value of share-based payment awards includes estimating the expected life of the award, the expected stock price volatility over the expected life of the awards, expected dividend yield, and risk-free interest rate. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of our common stock.  We base the expected term of the options on our historical option exercise data with a minimum life expectancy equal to the vesting period of the option.  We base the risk-free interest rate on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of the grant for a term closest to the expected life of the options. Expected dividend yield is not considered as we have not made any dividend payments and have no plans of doing so in the foreseeable future. Forfeitures are estimated based upon our historical experience. This estimate is adjusted periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate.

We recorded $468,000 and $873,000 of share-based compensation expense in 2010 and 2009, respectively. During 2009 we reviewed our recent unvested option forfeiture history and revised our estimated forfeitures to an annual rate of 15% and trued up the recorded compensation expense to the revised rate.  This estimate revision increased expenses by approximately $143,000 in 2009.

Income Taxes

The calculation of tax assets and liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined at the end of each year based on the future tax consequences that can be attributed to net operating loss and credit carryovers as well as the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  The deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that the tax benefits will not be realized.  The realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income.  In determining the valuation allowance, we consider past performance, expected future taxable income, and qualitative factors when estimating future taxable income.  Our forecast of expected future taxable income is for future periods that can be reasonably estimated.  Changes in results that differ materially from our current expectations may cause us to change our judgment on future taxable income. These changes, if any, may require us to adjust our existing tax valuation allowance higher or lower than the amount we have previously recorded.

18

Results of Operations — Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

Revenue

Revenue declined 24% in 2010 to approximately $2.7 million when compared to 2009. Product revenue related to InfoWorkSpace declined approximately $790,000 or 23%, while product development revenue declined by approximately $61,000. Product development revenue is revenue related to product customization work performed for customers seeking enhancements to our current product. The decline in license revenue in 2010 was the result of a shortfall in license renewals primarily due to redirections of the IT budget by the DISA and the second NCES contract award to our competitor, which resulted in a number of our existing customers not renewing their licenses and/or reducing the number of licenses used.

Gross profit

Cost of revenue includes material costs, costs of third-party software licenses, direct labor and overhead, customer support costs, and engineering and development costs associated with sponsored and customized product development revenue. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased in 2010 to 62.0% from 61.8% in 2009.

Research and development

Research and development expenses include payroll, employee benefits, other headcount-related costs, and miscellaneous costs associated with product development. Research and development expenses decreased to approximately $1.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2010, from approximately $1.7 million in 2009. This decrease is primarily attributable to the capitalization of software costs associated with the release of our new MxM Secure product, along with a reduction in the number of employees.

Sales and marketing

Sales and marketing expenses include payroll, employee benefits, and other headcount-related costs associated with sales and marketing personnel along with expenses pertaining to advertising, tradeshows, seminars, and other marketing-related programs.  Sales and marketing expenses increased 12% to approximately $1.2 million in 2010 from approximately $1.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2009. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in consulting and professional expenses offset by a reduction in payroll related expenses.

General and administrative

General and administrative costs include payroll, employee benefits, other headcount-related costs associated with the finance, human resources, management information systems, and other administrative headcount, legal and investor relations costs, and other administrative fees.  General and administrative expenses were approximately $2.0 million in 2010, a decline of $562,000 from those incurred in 2009.  The decline in expenses was primarily in the area of payroll related expenses due to a reduction in headcount offset by an increase in legal fees.

Occupancy and other facilities-related expenses

Occupancy and other facilities-related expenses increased 10% to approximately $285,000 in the year ended December 31, 2010, from approximately $259,000 in 2009. These costs include rent expense and other operating costs associated with our headquarters in Nashua, New Hampshire, and our sales offices in Sterling, Virginia. This increase is primarily due to additions to the accrued restructuring liability for the closed Colorado facility.

19

Interest income

Interest income consists of interest on cash and cash equivalents.  Interest income decreased to approximately $12,000 in 2010 from approximately $45,000 in 2009. The decrease in 2010 was primarily related to a decrease in the interest rates and a reduced cash balance.

Other income

Other income consists of gains and losses related to short-term mutual fund investments. In 2010 and 2009, we recorded gains of approximately $20,000 and $46,000, respectively, due to the increase in the market value of our short-term investments.

Income tax benefit

Due to the uncertainty of future taxable income, we have not recorded an income tax benefit for the losses incurred in 2010 and 2009.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $1.8 million.  We incurred a loss from operations of approximately $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, and a net loss for the year of approximately $2.8 million, as compared with an operating loss of approximately $3.5 million and a net loss of approximately $3.4 million in 2009.

We used cash for operations of $2.4 million in each of fiscal years 2010 and 2009. Cash expended for operating activities in 2010 was primarily the result of a net loss, an increase in accounts receivable and prepaid licenses, offset by an increase in deferred revenue and non-cash items such as depreciation and share-based compensation. Cash used by operating activities in 2009 was primarily the result of a net loss and a decline in deferred revenue offset by decreases in accounts receivable and prepaid software licenses, and non-cash items such as depreciation and share-based compensation.

We invested cash of approximately $130,000 in software capitalization charges in 2010 along with $27,000 in property and equipment in fiscal 2010 compared to $43,000 in fiscal 2009. We generated cash from financing activities of $99,000 in 2010 primarily from proceeds of sales of our common stock pursuant to our various stock plans, and no cash from financing activities in 2009.

We lease our primary facility in Nashua, New Hampshire, under an operating lease, which expires in August 2012.  We also have leased office space, located in Sterling, Virginia, and our lease for such property was recently extended to June 2013.  Future minimum lease obligations at December 31, 2010, under all of these non-cancelable operating leases are $70,000 in 2011, $60,000 in 2012 and $18,000 in 2013.

In September 2007, we announced our plan to consolidate our Colorado Springs and Nashua facilities in Nashua, New Hampshire by the end of 2007.  We recorded a restructuring charge of $215,000 to cover the expected lease payments of the Colorado Springs facility, net of expected sublease proceeds. In 2008, we reassessed our exposure in consideration of the current real estate market and interest in the space to date by potential subtenants.  Based on the resulting conclusions, we recorded an additional restructuring charge of $219,000 in 2008 and $61,000 in 2010 to the restructuring liability. The space is leased by us through November 2011 and is currently available for subleasing. We estimate that we will have to pay $86,000, net of estimated sublease proceeds, over the remaining lease term. Our gross remaining obligation on the lease, including estimated operating expenses, is approximately $162,000.

In April 2007, we entered into a new agreement with Microsoft to extend an existing software distribution license agreement through December 2008.  Under the agreement, we are required to purchase a minimum of $1.7 million and $2.75 million of licenses during 2007 and 2008, respectively, plus purchase an additional $0.5 million over the life of the two year agreement. During 2007, we reviewed our forecast for license sales over the balance of the agreement and recorded a charge of $1.45 million to reserve for an excess purchase commitment.  The charge was recorded as a component of cost of product revenue during the year ended December 31, 2007.

20

In December 2008, the Microsoft agreement was amended to extend the term through June 2011 and reduce the remaining purchase commitment to $2.75 million; $2.1 million of which has been satisfied to date.  The amended agreement requires that we make additional payments of $0.7 million during 2011.  In addition to the remaining $0.7 million license purchase commitment, we have approximately $1.6 million of prepaid licenses on hand that have yet to be deployed to customers.  During 2010, we continued to experience a decline in the volume of our customer license renewals and in early 2011 entered into negotiations with Microsoft to extend the term of the Microsoft agreement.  Microsoft has tentatively agreed to allow us an additional three year period to deploy the prepaid licenses once the 2011 payment schedule has been completed. We reviewed our current forecast for license sales and believe that the $1.45 million reserve remains the appropriate reserve for the excess purchase commitment.  The prepaid licenses as of December 31, 2010, along with payments to be made in 2011, net of the reserve, represent inventory that is expected to be used in meeting license renewals and new business license requests. The computation of the excess purchase commitment reserve requires management to make certain assumptions regarding future license renewals and sales growth.  Actual results may differ materially from management’s estimates.

We include standard intellectual property indemnification provisions in our licensing agreements in the ordinary course of business. Pursuant to our product license agreements, we will indemnify, hold harmless, and agree to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, generally business partners or customers, in connection with certain patent, copyright or other intellectual property infringement claims by third parties with respect to our products. Other agreements with our customers provide indemnification for claims relating to property damage or personal injury resulting from the performance of services by us or our subcontractors. Historically, our costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims relating to such indemnity agreements have been insignificant. Accordingly, the estimated fair value of these indemnification provisions is immaterial.

Operating costs are continually under review and adjusted accordingly. With our revenue continuing to decline in 2010, we began taking drastic cost-cutting measures, including a reduction in our headcount from  25 employees to 13 employees in March 2011, coupled with decreases in other general and administrative expenses.  We believe that this new headcount level along with additional expense controls will reduce our cash disbursements to a point where our existing cash plus anticipated renewal and new orders will allow us to continue our operations while we concentrate on the considerable identified opportunities.

The audit opinion and notes that accompany our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, disclose a ‘going concern’ explanation concerning our ability to continue to operate as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements for the year then ended have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern. Such assumption contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.  As shown in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, we incurred a $2.8 million loss and $2.4 million of negative cash flows from operating activities for the year then ended and at December 31, 2010, and ended the year with working capital of $0.9 million.  These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Order bookings, which are purchase orders placed by customers, are not recorded as revenue or recognized as revenue until all requirements of that order are satisfied, although the cash flow received from these orders may more closely follow the receipt date of the order. Management believes that its existing cash and cash equivalents, expected renewals and new business are sufficient to fund operations for the next 12 months.  However, we can provide no assurances that we will be able to continue as a going concern.

21

The following table summarizes our outstanding contractual obligations:

Recent Accounting pronouncements

In April 2010, ASU 2010-17 was issued relative to recognizing revenue under the milestone method.  This ASU provides guidance to vendors on the criteria that should be met for determining whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate.  This ASU is effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010.  We do not expect that this ASU will have a material impact on our financial statements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

To date, we have not utilized derivative financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments. We invest cash in highly liquid investments, consisting of highly rated U.S. and state government securities, commercial paper, short-term money market funds and mutual funds. These investments are subject to general credit and market risk and we have no debt other than our contractual lease obligations. A 10% change in interest rates would not have a material impact on our financial position, operating results or cash flows. We have closed our foreign offices, and sales to foreign customers from the United States are in U.S. dollars.  Therefore, we have no significant foreign currency risk.

22

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

INDEX

23

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Ezenia!, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Ezenia!, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ezenia!, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has had recurring losses, and negative cash flows from operations and has limited existing resources available to meet 2011 commitments..  This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

March 31, 2011

24

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Ezenia! Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Ezenia! Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal controls over financial reporting.  Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Ezenia! Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ CATURANO AND COMPANY, P.C.

Boston, Massachusetts

March 30, 2010

25

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except for share and per share related data)

See accompanying notes.

26

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except for share and per share related data)

See accompanying notes.

27

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(In thousands, except for share related data)

See accompanying notes.

28

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

See accompanying notes.

29

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

1.             Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation

Ezenia! Inc. (“Ezenia”, “we”, or the “Company”) operates in one business segment, which is the design, development, production, marketing and sale of real-time group collaboration and communication solutions for corporate and governmental networks and eBusiness.  Founded in 1991, we develop and market products that enable organizations to provide high-quality group communication and collaboration capabilities to commercial, governmental, consumer and institutional users.  Our products allow individuals and groups, regardless of proximity constraints, to interact and share information in a natural, spontaneous way — voice-to-voice, face-to-face, mouse-to-mouse, or keyboard-to-keyboard, flexibly, securely and in real time.  Using our products, individuals can interact through a natural meeting experience, allowing groups to work together effectively and disseminate vital information quickly in a secure environment.

We have experienced recurring net losses of $2.8 million and $3.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Additionally, we have used net cash in operating activities of $2.4 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.  These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our plans regarding these concerns are addressed in the following paragraph. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

In response to current financial conditions, we have undergone a reduction in our workforce from 25 employees to 13 employees in March 2011, as well as other reductions in other general and administrative expenses.  We have also continued to strengthen our sales force in order to increase our sales volume.

Our existing cash and cash equivalents are insufficient to fund our operations for the next twelve months. Therefore, we will need to rely upon renewal orders and the generation of new sales in order to fund operations and there can be no assurance that such activity will be sufficient.  The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis and do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ezenia and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Ezenia International, Inc. and Ezenia Latin America, Inc.  All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated.  All assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated at the rate of exchange at the end of the year, while sales and expense are translated at the average rate in effect during the year.  The net effect of these translation adjustments was immaterial for all periods presented.

2.             Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, if any, at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Product revenue consists of sales of InfoWorkSpace software licenses and maintenance agreements, InfoWorkSpace product related training and consulting.  Revenue from sales of InfoWorkSpace software license and maintenance agreements is recognized ratably over the subscription software license contract periods, which are generally one year.  Revenue from InfoWorkSpace training, installation, and consulting services is recognized as the services are performed, provided there is vendor specific objective evidence of fair value, which is the price charged when the services are sold separately.

30

Product development revenue relates to contracts involving customization of the InfoWorkSpace product according to a customer’s specifications.  When reliable estimates are available for the costs and efforts necessary to complete the product development and the contract does not include contractual milestones or other acceptance criteria, product development revenue is recognized under the percentage-of-completion contract method based upon input measures, such as hours.  When such estimates are not available, we defer all revenue recognition until we have completed the contract and have no further obligations to the customer.  Revenue associated with contracts for product development revenue with milestone-based deliverables requiring a customer’s acceptance is recognized upon the customer’s acceptance in accordance with the terms of the contract.  The associated cost recognition with these deliverables or milestones is deferred until the terms of acceptance are satisfied and revenue is recognized. Certain of our product development contracts are subject to government audit and retroactive adjustment of the direct and indirect costs used to determine the contract billings.  Product development revenue and accounts receivable reported in the financial statements are recorded at the amount expected to be received.  Product development revenue is adjusted to actual upon final audit and retroactive adjustment.  Estimated contractual allowances are provided based on management’s evaluation of current contract terms.

Products and software licenses are sold without any contractual right of return by the customer.  Deferred revenue represents amounts received from customers under subscription software licenses, maintenance agreements, or for product sales in advance of revenue recognition.  Judgments are required in evaluating the creditworthiness of our customers.  In all instances, revenue is not recognized until we have evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.  Amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling charges are recorded as revenue upon shipment and the related costs are included in cost of goods sold.

Third-Party Technology

Our InfoWorkSpace product incorporates third-party technology in the form of software licenses, which we purchase from other software vendors.  Software licenses purchased from vendors are reported as prepaid licenses and, when deployed, amortized to cost of revenue over the subscription period, which is generally one year.

Advertising

Advertising costs are included in sales and marketing expense.  We use our website as our main form of advertising along with participating in various industry-related trade shows. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.  Advertising expense was approximately $23,000 and $16,000 in fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of 90 days or less at the date of purchase, or investments that can be converted to cash quickly such as mutual funds, to be cash equivalents.

Financial Instruments and Concentrations of Credit Risk

Our financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses.  The carrying value of these financial instruments approximates fair value due to their short term to maturity.  Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk, are cash equivalents and accounts receivable.

Major financial institutions maintain all of our cash equivalents.  At times, balances may exceed federally insured limits.  We have not experienced any losses in such accounts, and believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.  Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is limited to certain customers to whom we make substantial sales.  To reduce risk, we routinely assess the financial strength of our customers.  We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based on accounts past due according to contractual terms and historical collection experience.  Actual losses when incurred are charged to the allowance.

31

Revenue from one customer accounted for approximately 63% of total revenue in 2010 and 56% of total revenue in 2009.  Accounts receivable from this customer accounted for approximately 10% and 20% of the balances at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  A second customer accounted for approximately 13% of total revenue in 2010 and 16% of total revenue in 2009.  A third customer accounted for approximately 13% of total revenue in 2010 and 6% of total revenue in 2009.  Revenue from international markets was immaterial in both 2010 and 2009.

Equipment and Improvements

Equipment and improvements are stated at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Research and Development Costs

Costs that are incurred internally in researching and developing a computer software product are charged to expense until technological feasibility has been established for the product.  Once technological feasibility is established, software development costs are capitalized until the product is available for general release to customers.  During 2010, we released our new MxM Secure software product.  In connection with this development effort, a total of $130,000 of costs were capitalized and will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic life of the product of three years.  Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 was approximately $21,000 and is included as a component of cost of product revenue.

Judgment is required in determining when technological feasibility of a product is established as well as its economic life.  In most cases, we have determined that technological feasibility for our software products/updates is reached shortly before the products are released to manufacturing. Costs incurred after technological feasibility is established have historically not been material, and accordingly, were expensed when incurred in these instances.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined at the end of each year based on the future tax consequences that can be attributed to net operating loss and credit carryovers as well as the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  The deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that the tax benefits will not be realized.  The realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income.  In determining the valuation allowance, we consider past performance, expected future taxable income, and qualitative factors which we consider to be appropriate to be considered in estimating future taxable income.  Our forecast of expected future taxable income is for future periods that can be reasonably estimated.  Results that differ materially from our current expectations may cause us to change our judgment on future taxable income.  These changes, if any, may require us to adjust our existing tax valuation allowance higher or lower than the amount we have recorded.

32

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss represents the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources.  Comprehensive loss consists of the net loss for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and is reported within the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity.

Net Loss Per Share

Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share are as follows:

Accounting for Share-Based Compensation

Share-based compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the award.  Share-based compensation expense for awards granted to non-employees is determined using the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measured.  The fair value of options and restricted stock awards granted to non-employees is periodically remeasured as the underlying options or awards vest.  We estimate the fair value of each share-based award using the Black-Scholes option valuation model.  The Black-Scholes option valuation model incorporates assumptions as to stock price volatility, the expected life of options, a risk-free interest rate and dividend yield.  We recognize share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally four years.

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we recorded share-based compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations as follows:

We estimate the fair value of each option award issued under the plans on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes based option-pricing model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of our common stock. We base the expected term of the options on our historical option exercise data with a minimum life expected equal to the vesting period of the option. We base the risk-free interest rate on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of the grant for a term closest to the expected life of the options.

33

Based on the above assumptions, the weighted average estimated fair value of options granted in fiscal years 2010 and 2009 was $0.12 and $0.08 per share, respectively.  During 2009, we reviewed our recent unvested option forfeiture history and revised our estimated forfeitures to an annual rate of 15% and recorded an additional $143,000 in compensation expense based upon the revised rate.

Other reasonable assumptions about these factors could provide different estimates of fair value.  Future changes in stock price volatility, life of options, interest rates, forfeitures and dividend practices, if any, may require changes in our assumptions, which could materially affect the calculation of fair value.

Total unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to unvested stock options, expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.28 years, amounted to $361,000 at December 31, 2010.

There were no stock option exercises in 2009 and the weighted average exercise price of stock options exercised for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $0.11.  The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $57,000.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2010, ASU 2010-17 was issued relative to recognizing revenue under the milestone method.  This ASU provides guidance to vendors on the criteria that should be met for determining whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate.  This ASU is effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010.  We will review these provisions during the next reporting period, but do not expect that this ASU will have a material impact on our financial statements.

Subsequent Events

We have evaluated all events or transactions through the date of this filing.  During this period, we did not have any material subsequent events that impacted our consolidated financial statements.

3.                                      Equipment and Improvements

Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the respective assets.  Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the improvements or the remaining lease term.  For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, equipment and improvements consisted of the following:

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $98,000 and $153,000, respectively.

4.                                      Income Taxes

Due to the uncertainty of future taxable income, we have not recorded an income tax benefit for the losses incurred in 2010 and 2009.

34

Our deferred tax assets consist of the following: