Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - FORM 8-K - CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORP | c13649e8vk.htm |
Exhibit 99.1
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 7, 2011
NYSE Symbol: CPK
March 7, 2011
NYSE Symbol: CPK
CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION REPORTS INCREASED RESULTS FOR 2010
| A record-high net income of $26.1 million, or $2.73 per share, in 2010, compared to
$15.9 million and $2.15 per share in 2009. |
| Excluding the impact of the FPU merger and merger-related costs, Chesapeakes legacy
businesses generated net income of $17.2 million, or $2.44 per share, in 2010, compared to
$15.3 million, or $2.20 per share, in 2009. The $0.24 per share increase generated by
Chesapeakes legacy businesses in 2010 represents an 11-percent growth in earnings per
share. |
| FPUs net income increased by $7.5 million as a result of the inclusion of a full years
results and improved performance, generating an increase of $0.22 per share in 2010. |
| The decrease in merger-related costs added $0.12 per share in 2010. |
Dover, Delaware Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (NYSE: CPK) today announced increased
financial results for both the year and quarter ended December 31, 2010. The Companys net income
for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $26.1 million, or $2.73 per share, an increase of $10.2
million, or $0.58 per share, compared to $15.9 million, or $2.15 per share, for the year ended
December 31, 2009. Excluding the impact of the FPU merger and merger-related costs, Chesapeakes
legacy businesses continued to experience strong earnings growth and generated net income of $17.2
million, or $2.44 per share, in 2010, compared to $15.3 million, or $2.20 per share, in 2009,
representing an 11-percent growth in earnings per share. Chesapeakes legacy businesses generated
41 percent of the increase in consolidated earnings per share for the year. The results of the
legacy businesses reflect continued growth and expansions of the natural gas distribution and
transmission systems on the Delmarva Peninsula, a rate increase for the Companys Central Florida
Gas division, favorable weather impacts and improved performance in the advanced information
services business. These increases were partially offset by a decline in earnings from the natural
gas marketing and propane wholesale marketing businesses. Florida Public Utilities Company
(FPU) added $0.22 per share to the increase in the Companys overall results in 2010 due to the
inclusion of a full years results and improved performance. FPUs results have been included in
the Companys consolidated results since the completion of the merger on October 28, 2009. The
decrease in merger-related costs also added $0.12 per share to the increase in 2010.
The Companys net income for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 was $7.1 million, or $0.74 per
share, an increase of $923,000, or $0.03 per share, compared to $6.2 million, or $0.71 per share,
for the same period in 2009. Excluding the impact of the FPU merger and merger-related costs,
Chesapeakes legacy businesses generated net income of $5.4 million, or $0.77 per share, in the
fourth quarter of 2010, compared to $5.1 million, or $0.73 per share, for the same period in 2009,
representing a five-percent growth in diluted earnings per share. Strong performance by the
Delmarva propane distribution operation based on higher volume and retail margins, a rate increase
for the Companys Central Florida Gas division and favorable weather impacts all contributed to the
increase generated by Chesapeakes legacy businesses. FPUs results for the fourth quarter of
2010, which include an additional accrual of $250,000 for the regulatory risk associated
with FPUs natural gas earnings and recovery of the purchase premium, decreased the earnings per
share by $0.05 per share. Discussions with the Florida Office of Public Counsel (Florida OPC) and the Florida PSC Staff (Florida PSC)
regarding such matters are
ongoing. Offsetting this decrease in earnings were lower merger-related costs expensed in the
fourth quarter of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, which added $0.04 per share.
2010 was an exceptional year for Chesapeake, stated Michael P. McMasters, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation. We achieved significant growth on the
Delmarva Peninsula with our continued efforts to expand the use of natural gas by very aggressively
promoting the pricing advantage and environmentally-friendly features of natural gas. We also
exceeded our goal to produce earnings accretion in the first year after the FPU merger as a result
of cost savings and capitalizing on new integration opportunities in Florida. We are
excited about the opportunities to further expand our business, both on the Delmarva Peninsula and in Florida, to
ensure continued growth for both our customers and shareholders.
1
Highlights for the fourth quarter of 2010 included:
| Operating income from the Delmarva propane distribution operations for the fourth
quarter of 2010 increased by $884,000, compared to the same period in 2009, due primarily
to higher volumes from the colder-than-normal weather, the timing of deliveries and
increased retail margins. |
||
| The rate increase for Chesapeakes Florida division, effective in January 2010,
contributed approximately $470,000 to gross margin for the quarter ended December 31, 2010. |
||
| Three-percent growth in residential customers for the Delmarva natural gas distribution
operation generated $115,000 in additional gross margin in the fourth quarter of 2010,
compared to the same period in 2009. Gross margin from commercial and industrial customers
for the Delmarva natural gas distribution operation also increased by $186,000 in the
fourth quarter of 2010, due primarily to the addition of 10 large commercial and industrial
customers. Combined with the other new large commercial and industrial customers added
during the first three quarters of the year, these new large commercial and industrial
customers will generate an estimated annual margin of $748,000, of which $196,000 has been
reflected in 2010s results. The customer additions enable the Company to further extend
the Delmarva natural gas distribution and transmission infrastructure, bringing
cost-effective and environmentally-friendly natural gas to new areas on the Delmarva
Peninsula and creating additional opportunities for future growth. |
|
Colder temperatures on the Delmarva Peninsula and in Florida during the fourth
quarter and year ended 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009, contributed additional
gross margin of $472,000 and $927,000 respectively. Additionally, given that only two months
of FPUs results were included in Chesapeakes consolidated 2009 gross margin, the appropriate
comparison for 2010 for the weather impact on FPU is also normal weather. Higher-than-normal
heating and cooling degree-days contributed $3.0 million in margin in 2010. The Company uses
historical results as the normal weather for this analysis.
|
||
| Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company (ESNG), the Companys natural gas transmission
subsidiary, generated additional gross margin of $140,000 from new transportation services
commencing in late 2009 and during 2010. The new transportation services in 2010 will
generate estimated annual margin of $332,000, of which $56,000 has been recognized in 2010. |
||
Although not affecting the Companys results in 2010, ESNG completed the eight-mile mainline
extension in December 2010 to interconnect with the Texas Eastern Transmission, LP (TETLP)
pipeline. ESNG commenced its new transportation services to the Companys Delaware and
Maryland Divisions in January 2011. These new services will generate gross margin of $2.4
million in 2011, $3.9 million in 2012 and $4.3 million annually thereafter. ESNGs
interconnection will provide the Delmarva natural gas distribution operation with access to
new sources of natural gas supply from other natural gas production regions, including the
Appalachian production region, thereby providing increased reliability and diversity of
supply. This new service will also provide the Delaware and Maryland divisions additional
upstream transportation capacity to meet current customer demands and to increase their
supply options as these divisions plan for sustainable growth. |
|||
| On December 30, 2010, ESNG filed a base rate proceeding with the Federal Regulatory
Energy Commission in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement from its prior
base rate base proceeding in 2008. ESNG expects the base rate proceeding to be completed
in 2011. |
||
| Included in FPUs results for the fourth quarter of 2010 is an additional accrual of
$250,000 for the regulatory risk associated with FPUs natural gas earnings, merger benefits and
recovery of the purchase premium. The Company is required to detail known benefits,
synergies, cost savings and cost increases resulting from the FPU merger and present the
information in a come-back filing to the Florida PSC by April 29, 2011 (within 18 months
of the merger). We are currently in discussions with the Florida OPC and the Florida PSC regarding the benefits and cost savings of the merger, current and
expected earnings levels as well as the recovery of approximately $34.9 million in purchase
premium and $2.2 million in merger-related costs. The additional accrual during the fourth
quarter, which brings the total accrual to $750,000, was recorded based on managements
assessment of FPUs current earnings, the regulatory environment in Florida and progress of
the current discussions. |
The discussions of the results for the periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, use the term
gross margin, a non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) financial measure, which
management uses to evaluate the performance of the Companys business segments. For an explanation
of the calculation of gross margin, see the footnote to the Supplemental Income Statement Data
chart. In addition, certain information is presented, which, for comparison purposes, includes only
FPUs results of operations for the periods ended December 31, 2010 and, in some cases, FPUs
results for the same periods in 2009, which were prior to the merger. Certain other information is
presented,
which, for comparison purposes, excludes results of operations of FPU from the consolidated results
of operations and all merger-related costs incurred in connection with the FPU merger for the
periods presented. Although non-GAAP measures are not intended to replace the GAAP measures for
evaluation of Chesapeakes performance, Chesapeake believes that the portions of the presentation
which include only the FPU results, or which exclude the FPU results for the post-merger period and
merger-related costs, provide helpful comparisons for an investors evaluation purposes.
2
Unless otherwise noted, earnings per share information is presented on a diluted basis. Earnings
per share information for Chesapeakes legacy businesses excluding the impact of the FPU merger and
merger-related costs is calculated based on weighted average common shares outstanding, which
excludes the shares issued in the FPU merger.
Comparative results for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
Operating income increased by $18.2 million, or 54 percent, from $33.7 million to $51.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2009. Included in operating income for the years
ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $18.4 million and $3.5 million in operating income from FPU,
respectively. FPUs results have been included in the Companys consolidated results since the
completion of the merger on October 28, 2009. Also included in operating income for the years
ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $660,000 and $1.5 million, respectively, in merger-related
costs. Excluding the impact of the FPU merger and merger-related costs, operating income from
Chesapeakes legacy businesses increased by $2.5 million, or eight percent, to $34.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $31.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Regulated Energy
Operating income for the regulated energy segment for the year ended 2010 was $43.5 million, an
increase of $16.6 million, or 62 percent, compared to the same period in 2009. An increase in
gross margin of $51.4 million was partially offset by an increase in other operating expenses of
$34.8 million. Items contributing to the period-over-period increase in gross margin are listed in
the following table:
(in thousands) | ||||
Gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2009 |
$ | 74,296 | ||
Factors contributing to the gross margin increase for the year ended December 31, 2010: |
||||
Margin from FPU operations |
46,239 | |||
Change in rates |
2,244 | |||
Net customer growth |
1,116 | |||
New transportation services |
995 | |||
Favorable weather |
612 | |||
Other |
215 | |||
Gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2010 |
$ | 125,717 | ||
| FPUs natural gas and electric distribution operations generated $37.1 million and
$18.4 million, respectively, in gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2010. Gross
margin from FPUs natural gas and electric distribution operations included in the
Companys results in 2009 were $6.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively. Gross margin
for FPUs natural gas distribution operation in 2010 includes a $750,000 accrual for the regulatory
risk associated with FPUs natural gas earnings, merger benefits and recovery of the
purchase premium previously described and the impact of the $8.0 million rate increase from
the rate settlement in 2009. Gross margin for FPUs natural gas distribution operation in
2010 also includes $148,000 generated from the 700 new customers added by the purchase of
the operating assets of Indiantown Gas Company. |
||
| An annual rate increase of approximately $2.5 million for Chesapeakes Florida natural
gas distribution operation was approved by the Florida PSC in December 2009 and became
effective in January 2010. The rate increase in 2010, net of the impact from the interim
rate increase in 2009, generated additional gross margin of $2.2 million for the year. |
3
| Net customer growth of $1.1 million in 2010 is due primarily to two-percent growth in
residential customers on the Delmarva Peninsula, which generated $512,000 in additional
gross margin, and $587,000 in gross margin generated from new commercial and industrial
customers added on the Delmarva Peninsula. In 2010, the Delmarva natural gas distribution
operations added 10 large commercial and industrial customers with total expected annual
margin of $748,000, of which $196,000 was recognized in 2010. The addition of certain
commercial and industrial customers in 2010 also positioned us to further extend our
natural gas distribution and transmission infrastructure in southern Delaware to serve
other potential customers in the same area. |
||
| New transportation services implemented by ESNG in November 2009, May 2010 and November
2010 as a result of system expansion projects generated an additional $1.1 million in gross
margin in 2010 compared to 2009. These expansion projects added 9,623 Mcfs of firm service
per day with estimated annualized gross margin of $1.6 million,
of which $1.2 million has
been reflected in 2010s results. New transportation service for an industrial customer for
the period from November 2009 to October 2012 generated additional gross margin of $329,000
in 2010. Offsetting these margin increases were decreased margins of $341,000 for the year resulting
from transportation service contracts, which expired in November 2009 and April 2010, and a
decrease in interruptible service to an industrial customer. |
||
| Colder weather on the Delmarva Peninsula generated an additional $365,000 in gross
margin for the Delaware division, as heating degree-days increased by 102, or two percent,
compared to 2009. Residential heating rates for our Maryland division are
weather-normalized, and we typically do not experience an impact on gross margin from the
weather for our residential customers in Maryland. Colder weather in Florida also
increased gross margin for Chesapeakes Florida natural gas distribution division by
$247,000 in 2010. |
Other operating expenses for the regulated energy segment increased by $34.8 million for 2010,
largely due to the inclusion of $32.4 million in other operating expenses from FPUs regulated
energy operations for the period. The remaining increase of $2.4 million, or a five-percent
increase over operating expenses in 2009, exclusive of other operating expenses of FPU, is
attributable to (i) increased payroll and benefits of $705,000 due primarily to annual salary
increases and incentive pay; (ii) increased depreciation and asset removal costs of $518,000 from
capital investments made in 2010 and 2009; (iii) increased regulatory expenses of $349,000
associated with ESNGs recent rate case filing and ongoing regulatory discussions involving the
merger impact and recovery of the purchase premium in Florida; and (iv) increased non-income-taxes
of $63,000 due primarily to increased gross-receipt taxes.
Unregulated Energy
Operating income for the unregulated energy segment for 2010 was $7.9 million, a decrease of
$250,000, or three percent, compared to 2009. An increase in gross margin of $6.5 million was
offset by an increase in other operating expenses of $6.8 million. A decline in operating income
for the unregulated energy segment is largely attributable to the natural gas marketing business,
which experienced a decrease in gross margin in 2010 due primarily to the absence of spot sales to one
industrial customer. Items contributing to a period-over-period increase in gross margin are listed
in the following table:
(in thousands) | ||||
Gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2009 |
$ | 29,565 | ||
Factors contributing to the gross margin increase for the year ended December 31, 2010: |
||||
Margin from FPU operations |
7,001 | |||
Volume increase weather and other |
1,077 | |||
Natural gas marketing |
(1,030 | ) | ||
Propane wholesale marketing |
(441 | ) | ||
Decreases in retail margin per gallon |
(399 | ) | ||
Miscellaneous fees and other |
340 | |||
Gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2010 |
$ | 36,113 | ||
4
| FPUs unregulated energy operation, which is primarily its propane distribution
operation, generated $10.0 million in gross margin in 2010. Gross margin from FPUs
unregulated energy operation and Chesapeakes Florida propane distribution operation in
2009 was $3.0 million. All of Chesapeakes Florida propane distribution operations were
transferred to FPU after the merger. |
||
| Increased gross margin from the addition of 436 community gas system customers in 2010
and 1,000 additional customers acquired in February 2010 as part of the purchase of the
operating assets of a propane distributor serving Northampton and Accomack counties in
Virginia contributed $170,000 and $235,000 to 2010 gross margin, respectively. Also
contributing to the increase in gross margin was two-percent colder weather on the Delmarva
Peninsula in 2010, as compared to 2009, as well as the timing of propane deliveries to bulk
customers. The cumulative impact of the colder weather and the timing of deliveries
resulted in increased gross margin of $672,000. |
||
| In 2010, gross margin for the Companys unregulated natural gas marketing subsidiary,
PESCO, decreased by $1.0 million. Spot sales decreased from 2009, due
primarily to the absence of spot sales to one industrial customer. Spot sales are not
predictable and, therefore, are not included in our long-term financial plans or forecasts. |
||
| The Companys propane wholesale marketing subsidiary, Xeron, experienced a $441,000
decrease in gross margin in 2010 as a result of a 13-percent decrease in trading volume.
|
||
| Inventory and swap adjustments for the 2008/2009 winter Pro Cap program of $1.8 million
as a result of a sharp decline in inventory prices in late 2008, lowered the propane
inventory cost of our Delmarva propane distribution operation during the first half of 2009
and generated higher retail margins during this period. During 2010, the retail margins
returned to more normal levels, resulting in a lower retail margin per gallon, and
decreasing gross margin by $399,000 for the Delmarva propane distribution operation. |
||
| Other fees increased by $340,000 in 2010, due primarily to continued growth and
increased customer participation in various customer pricing programs offered by the
Delmarva propane distribution operation. |
Other operating expenses for the unregulated energy segment increased by $6.8 million in 2010 due
primarily to an increase of $6.0 million associated with the inclusion of FPUs unregulated energy
business. The remaining increase of $771,000 in other operating expenses over 2009, or a
four-percent increase, exclusive of Florida operations, was attributable to (i) increased payroll
and benefit costs of $446,000; (ii) increased non-income-related taxes of $315,000 due primarily to
increased sales tax; and (iii) increased vehicle fuel costs of $166,000 due to increased propane
deliveries and higher fuel costs. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in bad debt
expense of $245,000 for the natural gas marketing operation as a result of expanded credit and
collection initiatives.
Other
Operating income for the Other segment for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $513,000,
compared to an operating loss of $1.3 million for the same period in 2009. This increase in
operating income of $1.8 million resulted from an increase in gross margin of $747,000 primarily
from BravePoint, the Companys advanced information services subsidiary, and a decline in other
operating expenses of $1.1 million, primarily due to lower merger-related costs expensed in 2010
compared to 2009.
BravePoint reported operating income of $759,000 for 2010, compared to an operating loss of
$229,000 for 2009. Gross margin from BravePoint increased by $801,000 due to a seven-percent
increase in billable consulting hours and higher revenue from its professional database monitoring,
support solution services and product sales.
Other operating expenses decreased by $1.1 million in 2010 compared to 2009. The decrease in other
operating expenses was attributable primarily to lower merger-related costs expensed in 2010
compared to 2009, and cost containment actions, including layoffs and compensation adjustments,
implemented by BravePoint in 2009.
5
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 increased by approximately $2.1 million, or
29 percent, compared to the same period in 2009. The primary drivers of the increased interest
expense are related to FPU, including:
| An increase in long-term interest expense of $1.3 million is related to interest on
FPUs first mortgage bonds. |
| Interest expense from a new term loan facility was $491,000 for the year. In January
2010, we redeemed two series of FPU bonds, the 4.9 percent and 6.85 percent series, by
using $29.1 million of this new short-term loan facility to reduce the amount of the FPU
secured long-term debt and to maintain compliance with the covenants in our unsecured
senior notes. |
| Additional interest expense of $730,000 is related to interest on deposits from FPUs
customers. |
Offsetting the increased interest expense from FPU was lower non-FPU-related interest expense from
Chesapeakes unsecured senior notes, as a result of scheduled repayments, and lower additional
short-term interest expense due to the timing of capital expenditures and reduced working capital
requirements, partially as a result of the increased bonus depreciation in 2010.
Chesapeake has entered into an arrangement with an existing unsecured note holder to refinance the
new short-term loan facility as Chesapeake unsecured senior notes. If this facility is refinanced
prior to July 8, 2011, these new unsecured senior notes will be issued at 5.68 percent and result
in annual long-term interest expense of $1.7 million, representing additional interest of $1.2
million, compared to the interest expense of $491,000 on the new short-term loan facility in 2010.
Comparative results for the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
Operating income increased by $1.5 million, or 12 percent, to $14.2 million for the fourth quarter
of 2010, compared to $12.7 million for the same period in 2009. Included in operating income for
the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $4.2 million and $3.5 million, respectively, in
operating income from FPU. FPUs results have been included in the Companys consolidated results
since the completion of the merger on October 28, 2009. Also included in operating income for the
fourth quarter of 2010 and 2009 were $481,000 and $948,000 in merger-related costs, respectively.
Excluding the impact of the FPU merger and merger-related costs, operating income from Chesapeakes
legacy businesses increased by $385,000, or four percent, to $10.4 million from $10.1 million for
the quarter ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2009.
Regulated Energy
Operating income for the regulated energy segment for the fourth quarter of 2010 was $11.1 million,
an increase of $803,000, or eight percent, compared to the same period in 2009. An increase in
gross margin of $6.2 million was offset by an increase in other operating expenses of $5.4 million.
Items contributing to the period-over-period increase in gross margin are listed in the following
table:
6
(in thousands) | ||||
Gross margin for the three months ended December 31, 2009 |
$ | 27,017 | ||
Factors contributing to the gross margin increase for the three months ended December 31, 2010: |
||||
Margin from FPU operations |
4,958 | |||
Increased customer consumption |
332 | |||
Net customer growth |
326 | |||
Change in rates |
325 | |||
Favorable weather |
212 | |||
New transportation services |
112 | |||
Other |
(21 | ) | ||
Gross margin for the three months ended December 31, 2010 |
$ | 33,261 | ||
| FPUs natural gas and electric distribution operations generated gross margin of
$9.8 million and $4.4 million, respectively, for the quarter ended December 31, 2010.
Gross margin from FPUs natural gas and electric distribution operations included in the
Companys results in the fourth quarter of 2009 were $6.4 million and $2.8 million,
respectively. Colder temperatures in Florida in November and December 2010, compared to
the same period in 2009, generated $422,000 in additional gross margin. Gross margin for
FPUs natural gas distribution operation in the fourth quarter of 2010 also includes
$99,000 generated from the 700 new customers added in conjunction with the purchase of the
operating assets of Indiantown Gas Company. Gross margin for FPUs natural gas
distribution operation in the fourth quarter of 2010 reflects the additional accrual of
$250,000 recorded for the regulatory risk associated with FPUs natural gas earnings, merger benefits
and recovery of the purchase premium previously described. |
||
| Increased consumption, particularly by commercial and industrial customers on both the
Delmarva Peninsula and in Florida, generated additional gross margin of $332,000 for the
quarter. |
||
| Three-percent growth in residential customers for the Delmarva natural gas distribution
operation generated $115,000 in additional gross margin in the fourth quarter of 2010,
compared to the same period in 2009. Gross margin from commercial and industrial customers
for the Delmarva natural gas distribution operation also increased by $186,000 in the
fourth quarter of 2010, due primarily to the addition of 10 large commercial and industrial
customers. Combined with other new large commercial and industrial customers added during
the first three quarters of the year, these new large commercial and industrial customers
will generate an estimated annual margin of $748,000, of which $196,000 has been reflected
in 2010s results. Also contributing to this increase is $25,000 in additional gross
margin generated from customer growth in Chesapeakes Florida natural gas distribution
division. |
||
| Gross margin for Chesapeakes Florida division increased by $470,000 in the fourth
quarter of 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, from an annual rate increase of
approximately $2.5 million approved by the Florida PSC in 2009 (effective in January 2010).
Changes in customers rates and rate classifications, primarily for certain Delmarva
natural gas distribution commercial and industrial customers with negotiated rates, lowered
gross margin by $150,000 in the fourth quarter of 2010. |
||
| New transportation services implemented by ESNG in November 2009, May 2010 and November
2010 as a result of its system expansion projects generated an additional $200,000 to gross
margin in the fourth quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. These expansion
projects added 9,623 Mcfs of service per day with estimated annual gross margin of $1.6
million. New transportation service for an industrial customer for the period from November
2009 to October 2012 generated additional gross margin of $25,000 in the fourth quarter of
2010, compared to the same period in 2009. Offsetting these margin increases were decreased margins of $58,000 for the year resulting
from transportation service contracts, which expired in November 2009 and April 2010, and a
decrease in interruptible service to an industrial customer. |
7
| Colder weather on the Delmarva Peninsula generated an additional $146,000 of gross
margin as heating degree-days increased by five percent for the fourth quarter of 2010
compared to the same period in 2009. Colder weather during the fourth quarter of 2010
contributed to an increase in gross margin of $66,000 by Chesapeakes Florida division. |
Other operating expenses for the regulated energy segment increased by $5.4 million in the fourth
quarter ended December 31, 2010, largely due to the increase of $4.1 million in other operating
expenses from FPUs regulated energy operations for the period. Other operating expenses from
FPUs regulated energy operations for the fourth quarter of 2010 include increased
non-income-related taxes, due primarily to the $265,000 accrual for sales tax. The remaining
increase of $1.3 million, or a 13-percent increase from operating expenses in 2009, exclusive of
other operating expenses of FPU, is attributable to (i) increased payroll and benefits by $255,000
due primarily to annual salary increases and incentive pay; (ii) increased depreciation and asset
removal costs by $123,000 from capital investments made in 2010 and 2009; (iii) increased
regulatory expenses by $257,000 associated with ESNGs recent rate case filing and ongoing
regulatory discussions involving the merger impact and recovery of purchase premium in Florida;
(iv) increased
costs related to pipeline integrity of $192,000; (v) increased non-income-related taxes of $170,000
associated with increased gross-receipt taxes; and (vi) increased bad debt expense of $58,000.
Unregulated Energy
The unregulated energy segment reported operating income for the fourth quarter of 2010 of $3.2
million, compared to operating income of $2.9 million for the same period in 2009. An increase in
gross margin of $1.6 million was partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in other operating
expenses. Items contributing to the period-over-period increase in gross margin are listed in the
following table:
(in thousands) | ||||
Gross margin for the three months ended December 31, 2009 |
$ | 9,272 | ||
Factors contributing to the gross margin increase for the three months ended December 31, 2010: |
||||
Volume increase weather and other |
853 | |||
Margin from FPU operations |
648 | |||
Increase in retail margin per gallon |
630 | |||
Natural gas marketing |
(451 | ) | ||
Propane wholesale marketing |
(292 | ) | ||
Miscellaneous fees and other |
175 | |||
Gross margin for the three months ended December 31, 2010 |
$ | 10,835 | ||
| Increased gross margin for the Delmarva propane distribution operation resulted from the
addition of 444 community gas system customers and approximately 1,000 customers added by
the acquisition of the operating assets of a propane distributor in Virginia in February
2010, which generated $38,000 and $91,000 in gross margin for the fourth quarter,
respectively. Five-percent colder weather on the Delmarva Peninsula, as well as the timing
of propane deliveries to bulk customers, further increased gross margin by $718,000. |
||
| FPUs unregulated energy operation, which is primarily its propane distribution
operation, generated $2.6 million in gross margin in the fourth quarter of 2010. Gross
margin from FPUs unregulated energy operation and Chesapeakes Florida propane
distribution operation in the fourth quarter of 2009 was $1.9 million. All of Chesapeakes
Florida propane distribution operation was transferred to FPU after the merger. |
||
| Higher retail margins per gallon during the fourth quarter of 2010 generated additional
gross margin of $630,000. |
||
| In the fourth quarter of 2009, PESCO benefited from increased spot sales to customers on
the Delmarva Peninsula. The absence of spot sales to one industrial customer on the
Delmarva Peninsula decreased PESCOs gross margin by $451,000 during the quarter. Spot
sales are not predictable and, therefore, are not included in our long-term financial plans
or forecasts. |
8
| Xeron experienced a $292,000 decrease in gross margin during the fourth quarter of 2010
compared to the same period in 2009. Xerons trading volumes decreased by 10 percent in
the fourth quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. |
||
| Other fees increased by $175,000 in the fourth quarter of 2010, due primarily to
continued growth and increased customer participation in various customer pricing programs
offered by the Delmarva propane distribution operation. |
Other operating expenses for the unregulated energy segment increased by $1.3 million in the fourth
quarter of 2010, due primarily to $728,000 of other operating expenses associated with the
inclusion of FPUs unregulated energy business. The remaining increase of $585,000 in other
operating expenses, or a 11-percent increase from other operating expenses, exclusive of Florida
operations, was attributable to (i) increased payroll and benefit costs of $333,000 due primarily
to increased bonuses; (ii) increased non-income-related taxes of $202,000 associated with increased
sales tax; and (iii) increased vehicle fuel costs of $61,000 resulting from increased propane
deliveries and higher fuel costs.
Other
Operating loss for the other segment for the fourth quarter of 2010 was $138,000, compared to
$613,000 for the same period in 2009. The reduction in operating loss of $475,000 resulted from an
increase of $123,000 in gross margin, primarily from BravePoint, and lower operating expenses of
$337,000, as a result of lower merger-related costs in 2010.
BravePoint reported operating income of $236,000 in the fourth quarter of 2010, compared to
operating income of $219,000 in the same period in 2009. Gross margin from BravePoint increased by
$160,000 due to a two-percent increase in billable consulting hours and higher revenue from its
professional database monitoring and support solution services, which was partially offset by
higher operating expenses of $142,000.
Merger-related costs, net of costs previously deferred, decreased by $447,000 due to lower
merger-related costs expensed in the fourth quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the fourth quarter of 2010 decreased by approximately $108,000, or 4.7
percent, compared to the same period in 2009. The lower interest expense resulted from the lower
principal balance of long-term debt and lower short-term borrowings due to the timing of capital
expenditures and reduced working capital requirements, partially as a result of the increased bonus
depreciation in 2010.
Partially offsetting the decrease in long-term interest expense for 2010 are increased expenses of
$175,000 associated with interest on deposits from FPUs customers and $135,000 in interest expense
for the quarter from a new short-term term loan facility. In January 2010, we redeemed two series
of FPU bonds, the 4.9 percent and 6.85 percent series, by using $29.1 million of this new
short-term loan facility to reduce the amount of the FPU secured long-term debt and to maintain
compliance with the covenants in our unsecured senior notes.
9
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
For the Periods Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in thousands, except shares and per share data)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
For the Periods Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in thousands, except shares and per share data)
Fourth Quarter | Year to Date | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Operating Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Regulated energy |
$ | 72,155 | $ | 52,677 | $ | 269,934 | $ | 139,099 | ||||||||
Unregulated energy |
42,775 | 36,737 | 146,793 | 119,973 | ||||||||||||
Other |
2,829 | 2,301 | 10,819 | 9,713 | ||||||||||||
Total Operating Revenues |
117,759 | 91,715 | 427,546 | 268,785 | ||||||||||||
Operating Expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Regulated energy cost of sales |
38,894 | 25,660 | 144,217 | 64,803 | ||||||||||||
Unregulated energy and other cost of sales |
33,386 | 28,506 | 116,098 | 95,467 | ||||||||||||
Operations |
20,486 | 15,886 | 75,335 | 50,706 | ||||||||||||
Transaction-related costs |
481 | 948 | 660 | 1,478 | ||||||||||||
Maintenance |
2,096 | 1,498 | 7,484 | 3,430 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5,040 | 4,353 | 20,758 | 11,588 | ||||||||||||
Other taxes |
3,188 | 2,206 | 11,064 | 7,577 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
103,571 | 79,057 | 375,616 | 235,049 | ||||||||||||
Operating Income |
14,188 | 12,658 | 51,930 | 33,736 | ||||||||||||
Other income (loss), net of other expenses |
(12 | ) | 144 | 195 | 165 | |||||||||||
Interest charges |
2,222 | 2,330 | 9,146 | 7,086 | ||||||||||||
Income Before Income Taxes |
11,954 | 10,472 | 42,979 | 26,815 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expenses |
4,841 | 4,282 | 16,923 | 10,918 | ||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 7,113 | $ | 6,190 | $ | 26,056 | $ | 15,897 | ||||||||
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
9,516,370 | 8,659,935 | 9,474,554 | 7,313,320 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
9,622,832 | 8,755,998 | 9,582,374 | 7,440,201 | ||||||||||||
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.75 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 2.75 | $ | 2.17 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.74 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 2.73 | $ | 2.15 | ||||||||
10
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
Supplemental Income Statement Data (Unaudited)
For the Periods Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
Supplemental Income Statement Data (Unaudited)
For the Periods Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in thousands, except degree-day data) | Fourth Quarter | Year to Date | ||||||||||||||
Chesapeake and Subsidiaries | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Gross Margin (1) |
||||||||||||||||
Regulated Energy |
$ | 33,261 | $ | 27,017 | $ | 125,717 | $ | 74,296 | ||||||||
Unregulated Energy |
10,835 | 9,272 | 36,113 | 29,565 | ||||||||||||
Other |
1,383 | 1,260 | 5,401 | 4,654 | ||||||||||||
Total Gross Margin |
$ | 45,479 | $ | 37,549 | $ | 167,231 | $ | 108,515 | ||||||||
Operating Income (Loss) |
||||||||||||||||
Regulated Energy |
$ | 11,149 | $ | 10,346 | $ | 43,509 | $ | 26,900 | ||||||||
Unregulated Energy |
3,176 | 2,925 | 7,908 | 8,158 | ||||||||||||
Other |
(137 | ) | (613 | ) | 513 | (1,322 | ) | |||||||||
Total Operating Income |
$ | 14,188 | $ | 12,658 | $ | 51,930 | $ | 33,736 | ||||||||
Heating Degree-Days Delmarva
Peninsula |
||||||||||||||||
Actual |
1,810 | 1,726 | 4,831 | 4,729 | ||||||||||||
10-year average (normal) |
1,605 | 1,573 | 4,528 | 4,462 | ||||||||||||
Heating Degree-Days Florida |
||||||||||||||||
Actual |
558 | 297 | 1,501 | 911 | ||||||||||||
10-year average (normal) |
325 | 316 | 919 | 863 | ||||||||||||
Cooling Degree-Days Florida |
||||||||||||||||
Actual |
166 | 336 | 2,859 | 2,770 | ||||||||||||
10-year average (normal) |
275 | 276 | 2,718 | 2,694 |
(1) | Gross margin is determined by deducting the cost of sales from operating revenue.
Cost of sales includes the purchased fuel cost for natural gas, electricity and propane and the
cost of labor spent on direct revenue-producing activities. Gross margin should not be considered
an alternative to operating income or net income, which is determined in accordance with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Chesapeake believes that gross margin, although a non-GAAP
measure is useful and meaningful to investors as a basis for making investment decisions. It
provides investors with information that demonstrates the profitability achieved by the Company
under its allowed rates for regulated operations and under its competitive pricing structure for
non-regulated segments. Chesapeakes management uses gross margin in measuring its business units
performance and has historically analyzed and reported gross margin information publicly. Other
companies may calculate gross margin in a different manner. |
11
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
Supplemental Income Statement Data (Unaudited)
Supplemental Income Statement Data (Unaudited)
The following presents FPUs results of operations for the three months and year ended December 31,
2010, included in Chesapeakes consolidated results. The information presented below is for
comparison purposes and is not intended to replace the GAAP measures for the evaluation of
Chesapeakes performance.
(in thousands) | Fourth Quarter | Year to Date | ||||||
FPU Stand-alone | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||
Gross Margin (1) |
||||||||
Regulated Energy |
||||||||
Natural Gas |
$ | 9,802 | $ | 37,057 | ||||
Electric |
4,364 | 18,390 | ||||||
Unregulated Energy |
||||||||
Propane and other |
2,575 | 9,968 | ||||||
Total Gross Margin |
$ | 16,741 | $ | 65,415 | ||||
Operating Income |
||||||||
Regulated Energy |
||||||||
Natural Gas |
$ | 3,296 | $ | 12,323 | ||||
Electric |
557 | 4,475 | ||||||
Unregulated Energy |
||||||||
Propane and other |
368 | 1,573 | ||||||
Total Operating Income |
$ | 4,221 | $ | 18,371 | ||||
(1) | Gross margin is determined by deducting the cost of sales from operating
revenue. Cost of sales includes the purchased fuel cost for natural gas, electricity and propane
and the cost of labor spent on direct revenue-producing activities. Gross margin should not be
considered an alternative to operating income or net income, which is determined in accordance with
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Chesapeake believes that gross margin, although
a non-GAAP measure, is useful and meaningful to investors as a basis for making investment
decisions. It provides investors with information that demonstrates the profitability achieved by
the Company under its allowed rates for regulated operations and under its competitive pricing
structure for non-regulated segments. Chesapeakes management uses gross margin in measuring its
business units performance and has historically analyzed and reported gross margin information
publicly. Other companies may calculate gross margin in a different manner. |
12
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
Distribution Utility Statistical Data (Unaudited)
Distribution Utility Statistical Data (Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2010 | For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chesapeake | Chesapeake | FPU NG | FPU Electric | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Delmarva NG | Florida NG | FPU NG | FPU Electric | Delmarva NG | Florida NG | Distribution | Distribution | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution | Division | Distribution | Distribution | Distribution | Division | (2) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Revenues (in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
$ | 11,571 | $ | 1,155 | $ | 5,197 | $ | 10,990 | $ | 10,398 | $ | 888 | $ | 4,172 | $ | 13,559 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
7,654 | 971 | 7,883 | 11,156 | 6,911 | 792 | 6,568 | 11,198 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
1,144 | 1,082 | 2,109 | 1,708 | 1,140 | 1,016 | 1,898 | 2,361 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other (1) |
5,292 | 563 | 2,225 | (2,263 | ) | 3,869 | 421 | (1,498 | ) | (2,241 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Revenues |
$ | 25,661 | $ | 3,771 | $ | 17,414 | $ | 21,591 | $ | 22,318 | $ | 3,117 | $ | 11,140 | $ | 24,877 | ||||||||||||||||
Volumes (in Mcfs/MWHs) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
684,329 | 97,507 | 311,130 | 73,363 | 586,870 | 66,075 | 237,500 | 70,959 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
559,230 | 341,672 | 784,158 | 81,512 | 502,352 | 300,450 | 682,423 | 79,269 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
1,000,019 | 3,206,128 | 510,577 | 13,770 | 815,685 | 2,912,077 | 440,797 | 13,130 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
31,940 | | 192,229 | (7,175 | ) | 106,105 | | 172,722 | (3,631 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
2,275,518 | 3,645,307 | 1,798,094 | 161,470 | 2,011,012 | 3,278,602 | 1,533,442 | 159,727 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average customers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
48,027 | 13,439 | 47,525 | 23,644 | 46,582 | 13,197 | 46,461 | 23,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
5,036 | 1,166 | 4,532 | 7,366 | 5,011 | 1,116 | 4,448 | 7,423 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
181 | 59 | 658 | 3 | 149 | 61 | 564 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
4 | | | | 8 | | 2 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
53,248 | 14,664 | 52,715 | 31,013 | 51,750 | 14,374 | 51,475 | 31,026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Operating revenues from Other sources include unbilled revenue, under (over)
recoveries of fuel cost, conservation revenue, other miscellaneous charges, fees for billing
services provided to third-parties and adjustments for pass-through taxes . |
|
(2) | Operating revenue, volume and average customer information for FPU-Natural Gas
Distribution and FPU-Electric Distribution are presented for comparative purposes only. They
include the FPU results from the period prior to the merger with Chesapeake, which are not included
in Chesapeakes consolidated results. |
13
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
Distribution Utility Statistical Data (Unaudited)
Distribution Utility Statistical Data (Unaudited)
For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2010 | For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chesapeake | Chesapeake | FPU NG | FPU Electric | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Delmarva NG | Florida NG | FPU NG | FPU Electric | Delmarva NG | Florida NG | Distribution | Distribution | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution | Division | Distribution | Distribution | Distribution | Division | (2) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Revenues (in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
$ | 46,041 | $ | 4,716 | $ | 23,026 | $ | 51,498 | $ | 51,309 | $ | 3,682 | $ | 20,248 | $ | 43,805 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
27,896 | 3,726 | 35,280 | 45,332 | 31,943 | 3,043 | 30,293 | 39,139 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
3,766 | 4,610 | 8,433 | 7,705 | 3,696 | 4,260 | 6,600 | 7,555 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other (1) |
3,162 | 1,847 | (1,240 | ) | (10,452 | ) | 2,268 | 1,376 | (2,789 | ) | (8,335 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Revenues |
$ | 80,865 | $ | 14,899 | $ | 65,499 | $ | 94,083 | $ | 89,216 | $ | 12,361 | $ | 54,352 | $ | 82,164 | ||||||||||||||||
Volumes (in Mcfs/MWHs) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
2,881,073 | 392,845 | 1,329,598 | 347,040 | 2,747,162 | 318,417 | 1,157,074 | 316,306 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
2,145,143 | 1,314,146 | 3,156,894 | 332,323 | 2,073,884 | 1,157,931 | 2,942,812 | 316,412 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
3,020,907 | 13,490,494 | 2,066,605 | 66,580 | 2,446,993 | 13,264,646 | 1,795,756 | 64,950 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
232,653 | | 12,723 | (6,287 | ) | 373,825 | | 28,641 | 6,250 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
8,279,776 | 15,197,485 | 6,565,820 | 739,656 | 7,641,864 | 14,740,994 | 5,924,283 | 703,918 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average customers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
47,638 | 13,427 | 47,626 | 23,589 | 46,717 | 13,267 | 46,781 | 23,679 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
5,048 | 1,135 | 4,498 | 7,374 | 5,019 | 1,114 | 4,466 | 7,405 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
172 | 59 | 622 | 3 | 143 | 62 | 539 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
5 | | | | 10 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
52,863 | 14,621 | 52,746 | 30,966 | 51,889 | 14,443 | 51,786 | 31,086 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Operating revenues from Other sources include unbilled revenue, under (over)
recoveries of fuel cost, conservation revenue, other miscellaneous charges, fees for billing
services provided to third-parties and adjustments for pass-through taxes . |
|
(2) | Operating revenue, volume and average customer information for FPU-Natural Gas
Distribution and FPU-Electric Distribution are presented for comparative purposes only. They
represent the FPU results from the period prior to the merger with Chesapeake and, therefore, they
are not included in Chesapeakes consolidated results. |
14
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed and Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
Condensed and Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
Assets | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
(in thousands, except shares and per share data) | ||||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment |
||||||||
Regulated energy |
$ | 500,689 | $ | 462,061 | ||||
Unregulated energy |
61,313 | 61,334 | ||||||
Other |
16,989 | 16,049 | ||||||
Total property, plant and equipment |
578,991 | 539,444 | ||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(121,628 | ) | (107,318 | ) | ||||
Plus: Construction work in progress |
5,394 | 4,461 | ||||||
Net property, plant and equipment |
462,757 | 436,587 | ||||||
Investments, at fair value |
4,036 | 1,959 | ||||||
Current Assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
1,643 | 2,818 | ||||||
Accounts receivable (less allowance for uncollectible
accounts of $1,194 and $1,609, respectively) |
88,074 | 69,773 | ||||||
Accrued revenue |
14,978 | 12,838 | ||||||
Propane inventory, at average cost |
8,876 | 7,901 | ||||||
Other inventory, at average cost |
3,084 | 3,149 | ||||||
Regulatory assets |
51 | 448 | ||||||
Storage gas prepayments |
5,084 | 6,144 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
6,748 | 2,614 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
2,191 | 724 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
4,613 | 5,853 | ||||||
Mark-to-market energy assets |
1,642 | 2,379 | ||||||
Other current assets |
245 | 147 | ||||||
Total current assets |
137,229 | 114,788 | ||||||
Deferred Charges and Other Assets |
||||||||
Goodwill |
35,613 | 34,095 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
3,459 | 3,951 | ||||||
Long-term receivables |
155 | 440 | ||||||
Regulatory assets |
23,884 | 20,100 | ||||||
Other deferred charges |
3,860 | 3,891 | ||||||
Total deferred charges and other assets |
66,971 | 62,477 | ||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 670,993 | $ | 615,811 | ||||
15
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed and Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
Condensed and Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
Capitalization and Liabilities | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
(in thousands, except shares and per share data) | ||||||||
Capitalization |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Common stock, par value $0.4867 per share (authorized 25,000,000 and 12,000,000 shares, respectively) |
$ | 4,635 | $ | 4,572 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital |
148,159 | 144,502 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
76,805 | 63,231 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(3,360 | ) | (2,524 | ) | ||||
Deferred compensation obligation |
777 | 739 | ||||||
Treasury stock |
(777 | ) | (739 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
226,239 | 209,781 | ||||||
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
89,642 | 98,814 | ||||||
Total capitalization |
315,881 | 308,595 | ||||||
Current Liabilities |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
9,216 | 35,299 | ||||||
Short-term borrowing |
63,958 | 30,023 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
65,541 | 51,462 | ||||||
Customer deposits and refunds |
26,317 | 25,046 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
1,789 | 1,887 | ||||||
Dividends payable |
3,143 | 2,959 | ||||||
Accrued compensation |
6,784 | 5,341 | ||||||
Regulatory liabilities |
9,009 | 8,295 | ||||||
Mark-to-market energy liabilities |
1,492 | 2,514 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
10,393 | 7,017 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
197,642 | 169,843 | ||||||
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities |
||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
80,031 | 66,008 | ||||||
Deferred investment tax credits |
243 | 335 | ||||||
Regulatory liabilities |
3,734 | 4,393 | ||||||
Environmental liabilities |
10,587 | 11,104 | ||||||
Other pension and benefit costs |
18,199 | 15,088 | ||||||
Accrued asset removal cost Regulatory liability |
35,092 | 33,214 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
9,584 | 7,231 | ||||||
Total deferred credits and other liabilities |
157,470 | 137,373 | ||||||
Total Capitalization and Liabilities |
$ | 670,993 | $ | 615,811 | ||||
16
Matters discussed in this release may include forward-looking statements that involve risks
and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking
statements. Please refer to the Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements in the Companys report
on Form 10-K for further information on the risks and uncertainties related to the Companys
forward-looking statements.
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation is a diversified utility company engaged in natural gas
distribution, transmission and marketing, electric distribution, propane gas distribution and
wholesale marketing, advanced information services and other related services. Information about
Chesapeakes businesses is available at www.chpk.com.
For more information, contact:
Beth W. Cooper
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
302.734.6799
Beth W. Cooper
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
302.734.6799
17