Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - MAKEMUSIC, INC. | c63338exv31w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - MAKEMUSIC, INC. | c63338exv31w2.htm |
EX-10.4 - EX-10.4 - MAKEMUSIC, INC. | c63338exv10w4.htm |
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - MAKEMUSIC, INC. | c63338exv23w1.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - MAKEMUSIC, INC. | c63338exv32w1.htm |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - MAKEMUSIC, INC. | c63338exv32w2.htm |
EX-10.8 - EX-10.8 - MAKEMUSIC, INC. | c63338exv10w8.htm |
EX-10.17 - EX-10.17 - MAKEMUSIC, INC. | c63338exv10w17.htm |
EX-10.18 - EX-10.18 - MAKEMUSIC, INC. | c63338exv10w18.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No.: 0-26192
MakeMusic, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Minnesota | 41-1716250 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
7615 Golden Triangle Drive, Suite M, Eden Prairie, MN 55344
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Address of principal executive offices)
(952) 937-9611
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock $.01 par value | NASDAQ Capital Market | |
(Title of each class) | (Name of each exchange on which registered) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§
229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller Reporting Company þ | |||
(Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of June
30, 2010 was approximately $10,652,330 based upon the closing price of the Registrants Common
Stock on such date.
There were 4,890,191 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of February 28, 2011.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one). Yes o No þ
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No. | ||||||||
2 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
15 | ||||||||
15 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
44 | ||||||||
45 | ||||||||
46 | ||||||||
47 | ||||||||
50 | ||||||||
58 | ||||||||
59 | ||||||||
60 | ||||||||
61 | ||||||||
EX-10.4 | ||||||||
EX-10.8 | ||||||||
EX-10.17 | ||||||||
EX-10.18 | ||||||||
EX-23.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 |
1
Table of Contents
Important Factors Regarding Future Results
Information provided by MakeMusic, Inc. (hereafter the Company or MakeMusic), in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, may contain forward-looking statements concerning such matters as
projected financial performance, market and industry segment growth, product development and
commercialization, acquisitions or other aspects of future operations. Such statements, made
pursuant to the safe harbor established by the securities laws, are based on the assumptions and
expectations of the Companys management at the time such statements are made. The Company cautions
investors that its performance (and, therefore, any forward-looking statement) is subject to risks
and uncertainties. Various important factors including, but not limited to, those discussed in Item
1 Cautionary Statements, may cause the Companys future results to differ materially from those projected
in any forward-looking statement. All information presented is as of December 31, 2010, unless
otherwise indicated.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Introduction
MakeMusic, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (referred to herein as we, us, the Company or
MakeMusic), is a world leader in music education technology whose mission is to develop and
market solutions that transform how music is composed, taught, learned and performed. MakeMusics
predecessor corporations, which were merged to form the current entity in 1992, were incorporated
in Minnesota in 1990. We currently have approximately one hundred employees and are based in Eden
Prairie, Minnesota.
MakeMusic develops and markets two product lines that reinforce each others features and
competitiveness. The well-established Finale® family of music notation software products
provides a solid base business that serves a large customer base, and generates consistent revenue
through sales of new products, annual upgrades and trade-up campaigns.
SmartMusic® is a subscription-based product directed toward the very large and
constantly renewing market of music students and their teachers. SmartMusic combines a software
application, a library of thousands of music titles and skill-development exercises, and a web
service to provide students with a compelling experience and teachers with the realistic means to
document student achievement and growth.
SmartMusic
Market Need
Many students naturally desire to learn to sing or play a musical instrument. The primary
obstacle for them is practicing, which is necessary if they are to develop the skills and expertise
music performance requires. The challenge is to find ways to make practice time more engaging and
rewarding in order to encourage students to practice longer and more effectively, which leads to
positive results. There is also an increasing demand for music teachers to document individual
student achievement and growth, something that is far easier for classroom teachers who routinely
give spelling tests, math quizzes, and science exams. It is impractical, however, for music
teachers to audition every student on a weekly basis to document their skill-development and their
proficiency with the music. The demand for measuring student performance and teacher effectiveness
is readily apparent. While the initial focus on accountability rarely included music instruction,
assessment standards are increasingly being applied to all subject areas. Administrators and music
educators seem to have a growing desire to measure the progress of music students to validate the
effectiveness of their programs and defend program funding. Accountability within the public
schools has gained prominence as evidenced by federal legislative activity including the No Child
Left Behind Act (NCLB) and Race to the Top (RttT).
In addition, music teachers are very sensitive to how well their student ensembles perform.
Each concert, musical and marching band performance puts their teaching effectiveness on display
for all in the community to evaluate. They are keenly interested in solutions that help them be
more effective and inspiring, so that they can produce noticeably better performances.
2
Table of Contents
The SmartMusic Solution
SmartMusic software is an interactive music teaching and learning solution for band,
orchestra, and vocal students to use at school and, more importantly, at home. SmartMusic enhances
and transforms the hours spent practicing by putting students inside a professional band or
orchestra, so that they can hear how the music is supposed to be performed and how their part fits
in. This makes practicing much more engaging, causing students to practice longer and more often.
SmartMusic also offers a rich variety of effective practice tools that make practice time more
efficient and productive. The combination of making practice time more engaging and productive
leads to rapid student skill-development, increased student confidence, higher student retention,
and stronger music programs.
Teachers use SmartMusic Gradebook, the web-based grade book that comes with each
teacher subscription, to post assignments to students, receive completed assignments from students,
assess student achievement, and manage student records. The grade book process works as follows:
1. | Teachers log in to SmartMusic Gradebook via a web browser, select a title the students are preparing for concert, and select a pre-defined assignment for that title. Teachers then set a due date, how many points the assignment is worth, and finally post the assignment to all students in the band or orchestra. This process takes the teacher about one minute. | ||
2. | Students log in to SmartMusic at home or at a school practice room and are immediately greeted by a list of assignments that are due. When students click on an assignment, it is automatically loaded for them and practice instructions are displayed. Students can then practice the assignment with SmartMusics practice tools: slow down the tempo, hear how their part is performed, set practice loops, use the tuner, etc. Students can even record their performance so that they can listen to themselves and better detect problems they need to correct. As students practice, they see notes and rhythms that were performed incorrectly turn red and those that were performed correctly turn green. In this manner, SmartMusic automatically assesses student performances, giving each student a score. | ||
3. | Once a student achieves a desired score, they click the Submit button so that the assignment and its final score are automatically sent to the teachers SmartMusic Gradebook. Although the student needs an Internet connection to do this, no browser or e-mail program is required. | ||
4. | Teachers can now see in their SmartMusic Gradebook which students have submitted assessment assignments and what grades were automatically given by SmartMusic. If the teacher required students to submit recordings of an assignment, the recordings are also in the Gradebook. Teachers can listen to recordings with a single click, which facilitates an efficient grading process. |
SmartMusic Assignments
With SmartMusic and SmartMusic Gradebook, teachers finally have a practical way to influence
students home practice time and measure individual student achievement. They are able to use
student records in SmartMusic Gradebook to explain semester grades to students and their parents.
SmartMusic Gradebook also makes it easy for a teacher to e-mail parents a recording of their
childs performance with a note, Listen to how great your child sounds! This encourages parents
to be more actively involved in their childs musical education.
Students understand that their teachers know, because of SmartMusic assignments, whether they
practice and whether they master their concert music. At the same time SmartMusic holds students
accountable, it makes their practice time more rewarding and inspiring. We believe students prefer
to work on assignments at home with SmartMusic and submit them via the Gradebook instead of
performing in front of their teacher and peers.
An administrator can audit their teachers SmartMusic Gradebook to verify that student
achievement is consistently being measured and that students are developing skills. This helps them
justify the music program, which is generally acknowledged as very important to the school
district.
3
Table of Contents
How Does SmartMusic Develop Skills and Motivate Students?
SmartMusic provides a rich combination of features that helps students focus their practice
time and master specific skills, contributing to a more engaging and rewarding practice. These
features include the following:
| Assessment. SmartMusic assesses student performance. Wrong notes and rhythms turn red while correct notes turn green. SmartMusic scores each attempt by the students, giving practice time a video game-like appeal. | ||
| Practice with professional accompaniment. SmartMusic puts the student into an ensemble of professionals. The music comes alive for them as they hear how professionals create the drama, excitement, and beauty of the music. | ||
| Practice at slower tempos. Students need to slow music down in order to master the technical challenges. SmartMusic allows students to set any tempo and then gradually build up speed. | ||
| Hear how their part is performed. SmartMusic will play each students part so that they can hear how a professional would perform it. | ||
| Record. Students often cannot hear what they are doing wrong as they sing or play. SmartMusic allows them to record themselves so that they can instantly hear what needs to be corrected. | ||
| Follow me feature. When practicing solo literature that requires expressive interpretation, SmartMusic listens to the students as they speed up or slow down and the accompaniment follows their tempo changes. Students are free to experiment with phrasing, learning to project their personalities into the music and make it their own. | ||
| Practice performing in tune. The SmartMusic tuner is built in and helps students hear where the pitch should be. | ||
| Fingering charts. When students do not know how to finger a note, they can just click on it to see its fingering chart. SmartMusic automatically provides the right chart for the instrument that the student is playing. (primarily for wind instruments) | ||
| Practice loops. Students can isolate difficult measures for concentrated practice. | ||
| Skill-development exercises in all keys. SmartMusic includes a large library of exercises that foster skills related to scales, intervals, arpeggios, rhythms, playing by ear, and jazz improvisation. | ||
| Wide range of repertoire. The SmartMusic accompaniment library includes classical, jazz, opera, worship, musical theater, classic rock, pop, and other genres. The accompaniments, made by professionals, are stylistic, authentic, and fun to practice with. Many of the jazz accompaniments, for example, are created by Wynton Marsaliss musicians. |
Licensing, Publisher Relations and Content Development
Content is critical to SmartMusics success. Determining what titles teachers want is
accomplished by studying published lists of titles such as 1) state contest approved lists, 2) most
often performed lists, 3) best-selling lists, 4) basic library lists, and 5) most teacher-requested
lists. Additionally, publisher requests, input from subscribers, and information from JW Pepper,
the largest sheet music retailer, are factors considered to determine content. The repertoire is
currently being extended to include popular instrumental solos where each student is able to be
the star and play the melody with rich accompaniment.
While the SmartMusic library contains many titles and exercises that are either in the public
domain or copyrighted by MakeMusic, the vast majority of SmartMusic content is licensed. Licenses
for band, orchestra, and vocal titles typically cover three usages: 1) the right to include the
title in SmartMusic, 2) the right to display the music notation (and lyrics if applicable)
on-screen, and 3) the right to use an audio recording of the title.
These rights are licensed from a wide range of music publishers, including industry leaders
such as Hal Leonard Corporation, Alfred Publishing, and Music Sales, Ltd. MakeMusic has been
successful at licensing titles for use within SmartMusic and believes it has good relations with
the publishing community at large. However, there is no guarantee that licensing efforts will
continue to be successful in the future.
The content development process for SmartMusic includes the following: 1) editing Finale
notation files supplied by publishers or engraving the files with Finale, and modeling the result
on the published music, 2) synchronizing the audio recording file with the Finale notation file, 3)
marking the audio file as needed for use within SmartMusic, 4) defining assignments for all large
ensemble titles, and 5) testing the final file. Once this process is complete, the file is added to
the library database and posted for available download to subscribers. The development
4
Table of Contents
costs for each title added into SmartMusic are capitalized and when added to the library
database, amortized over a five-year period.
In 2010, developing a typical band title that did not require engraving cost approximately
$620 per title and the typical orchestra title was approximately $325. If engraving was required,
the cost was approximately $2,730 per band title and $1,705 per orchestra title. The average cost
per title has declined from prior years due to department efficiencies and by moving some of the
external engraving work in house. Engraving is the process of taking hand written music notation
and converting it into publishable format. We expect the costs for band titles to continue to be
more than voice and orchestra titles due to their complexity and number of parts required.
Development costs will vary depending upon the complexity of each title.
As of December 31, 2010, SmartMusic had 1,688 titles available for band, 160 for jazz
ensemble, and 624 titles available for orchestra and during 2010 capitalized costs totaling
approximately $511,000. These band and orchestra titles are in addition to the thousands of titles
in SmartMusic of solo literature, numerous beginning methods, and skill-development exercises.
SmartMusic Application Development
The SmartMusic application is developed by an internal team of software programmers and
testers. Certain technologies are licensed from third parties and then adapted for use within
SmartMusic. Development priorities are set by researching how teachers and students use SmartMusic,
noting what improvements and additions are required.
The SmartMusic application coordinates a complex web of interacting technologies that include
1) playback of music, either synthesized or audio, 2) display of music notation on-screen with
Finale technology, 3) use of a microphone attachment to record a students performance, 4)
recognition of notes and rhythms and comparison of a students performance to what is notated, 5)
communication of errors and correction techniques to students, and 6) the support of a growing
selection of skill-development features that accelerate student learning. In addition, the
application has patented features, such as the Follow Me feature which allow students to develop
their skills of expression for solo literature.
Most importantly, the SmartMusic application communicates directly with the SmartMusic
Gradebook, making the posting and submitting of assignments automatic and problem-free. It also
manages aspects of the subscription service as well as content updates.
Licensed Technology
Certain pitch recognition software incorporated into SmartMusic for purposes of music
performance assessment is licensed from Institut de Recherche et Coordination Acoustique/Musique
(IRCAM) which is based in Paris, France. The license agreement continues in perpetuity and was
exclusive to SmartMusic through November 24, 2009. In light of the constantly changing environment
of music technology, coupled with an increase in alternative technology sources, we do not believe
the expiration of this license exclusivity has had a material impact on SmartMusic.
SmartMusic Patents
We licensed, from Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) on a worldwide basis for the life of the
patent, the use of the U.S. patent that covers the automated accompaniment developed by MakeMusic
that listens to and follows tempo changes from a live performance. Although this patent expired in
2005, we have further developed this technology and patented additional features. We have obtained
five additional patents that protect improvements to the user control of the software and that
contain certain aspects of the repertoire file that enhance the softwares algorithms,
accompaniment controls, and repertoire data file capabilities and expand miscellaneous interface
features of the product. As a result of the additional patented features we have developed, strong
synergy with our Finale notation product, and continuing development of an extensive library of
licensed repertoire, we do not believe that SmartMusic has been or will be materially affected by
the expiration in 2005 of the CMU patent.
SmartMusic Website and Back Office Development
The SmartMusic Gradebook is the most visible aspect of the web support provided to the
SmartMusic application. We use another layer of interacting technologies, databases, and services
to support the Gradebook. This
5
Table of Contents
ensures that the SmartMusic solution is comprehensive and that the SmartMusic experience is
logical, efficient and enjoyable.
The website and back-office services are also developed by an internal team of programmers and
testers. Certain aspects of this development are sometimes handled by external contractors with any
development remaining the property of MakeMusic.
SmartMusic Accessories
The primary SmartMusic accessories are the instrumental microphone and the vocal microphone
headset. These microphones are inserted into the microphone input of the computer and their audio
signal is routed to the SmartMusic software for recording and assessment analysis. The instrumental
microphone has a plastic-coated tip that allows it to be clipped onto a musical instrument or the
students clothing. We outsource the microphone manufacturing to suppliers who can meet the
specifications at competitive pricing. During 2010, the suggested retail price of the SmartMusic
microphones was $19.95. In 2009, we also introduced a USB microphone that retails for $29.95 and
lowers the entry cost for Macintosh users.
SmartMusic Subscription Business
SmartMusic is sold as an annual subscription. Currently, teacher subscriptions, which include
the SmartMusic Gradebook, are priced at $140. Additional subscriptions for school computers and
student home subscriptions are priced at $36. Multi-year subscriptions are also available. We
evaluate our pricing on an annual basis and changes may occur in the future.
As teachers come to rely on SmartMusic to prepare concert music and develop student skills, we
believe they will post more and more SmartMusic assignments to their students. Because teachers are
able to quickly post assignments and SmartMusic assesses and grades automatically, teachers can
easily post assignments related to scales, intervals, arpeggios, rhythms, and solo repertoire as
well as their concert music. We expect that as teachers post a greater number of SmartMusic
assignments, more students will be motivated to have SmartMusic at home and our student
subscription rates will increase.
Among the statistics by which investors can evaluate SmartMusic growth are the following:
| Number of SmartMusic educator accounts | ||
| Number of SmartMusic Gradebook teachers (those having issued assignments to 50+ students) | ||
| Total number of SmartMusic subscriptions | ||
| Subscription renewal rates |
SmartMusic subscriptions are sold directly to teachers, parents, and students. Marketing
communications consist primarily of presentations, clinics, and exhibits at music educator state
conferences, e-mail, and direct mail. Direct sales efforts are typically aimed at the 17,000
schools who match our ideal demographic profile. We are focusing such efforts on twenty-four key
music education states including Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois, and Minnesota and the Race to
the Top fund winners.
SmartMusic Site Agreements
SmartMusic site agreements are intended to encourage large deployments of SmartMusic student
subscriptions. The site agreements provide schools with coterminous subscriptions for all students
and teachers and discounted pricing is available. The special site agreement pricing reduces all
prices by 15% for 100 or more subscriptions. We offer reasonably priced teacher training to support
these larger installations and offer a training workbook and DVD as well. As of December 31, 2010,
there were 485 site agreements for SmartMusic. We expect the number of site agreements to increase
in the future due to our recently expanded direct sales force and focused marketing initiatives.
SmartMusic Sales and Marketing
The market for SmartMusic is large, with student use being the largest potential market. It is
estimated that approximately 55,000 school buildings offer instrumental programs, and over 17,000
of these schools match our ideal demographic profile. Recent independent research suggests that an
estimated 6,000,000 students participate in instrumental programs with additional students
participating in school choral programs. We believe the key to
6
Table of Contents
expanding the number of subscriptions for students is producing a compelling reason for
educators to make SmartMusic an integral part of their curriculum and the basis for how they
deliver and grade regular student assignments. Further, we believe that the majority of students
will prefer the convenience and enhanced practice experience of completing SmartMusic assignments
at home and it is this dynamic that will drive subscription growth.
As of December 31, 2010, MakeMusic had more than 9,400 teacher accounts with active SmartMusic
subscriptions. Since these teachers are already using SmartMusic, they will likely be the first to
adopt SmartMusic Gradebook and embrace the concept of requiring students to submit frequent
SmartMusic assignments. Therefore, this group of users represents one of our most important target
segments. We are able to track when each teacher creates a SmartMusic Gradebook account, when they
set up a class and the number of students enrolled. As a result, we have the ability to tailor our
direct marketing messages.
For the first time, the SmartMusic solution provides administrators with the ability to easily
measure individual student achievement and growth, create and deliver district-wide curriculum, and
provide parents with secure on-line access to student assignments and grades. Based on this
solution, MakeMusic has established a direct sales organization. The field sales representatives
have an objective of calling on district decision-makers and selling a higher number of
subscriptions for each installation.
Prospecting efforts are largely based on ranking school districts in target states based on
student population, average household income, and geography. Priorities are established by
identifying current users in target districts and requesting their assistance in setting up a
meeting and presentation with district decision-makers and other music educators within the
district and in neighboring districts.
Our SmartMusic marketing efforts are exclusively focused on the U.S. and Canadian markets and
directed primarily at public and private school music administrators, instrumental music educators,
and their students. In addition to aggressive direct marketing programs, MakeMusic participates in
more than 40 annual music educator conventions and presents SmartMusic clinics in a variety of
settings to cultivate demand.
The primary distribution for SmartMusic subscriptions is via our direct sales organization and
the www.smartmusic.com website (linked with www.makemusic.com and
www.finalemusic.com). School orders are normally processed directly through the MakeMusic customer
support department.
SmartMusic Competition
SmartMusic is a revolutionary concept that created a new product category for teaching and
learning music. As such, it entered the market with no direct competitors and no major competitors
exist today.
At this time, no competitor has a library of content comparable to SmartMusic. Nor does any
competitor have SmartMusic Gradebook functionality, the follow me
feature, or the ability to
utilize Finale files for user-created content. We believe these features, as well as our
long-standing relationships with major industry partners, comprehensive repertoire, and our
competitive pricing strategies, represent significant competitive barriers, but we can make no
assurances that SmartMusic will not face challenging competition in the future.
Finale family of notation products
We are a market leader in music notation software with our Finale family of products for use
with Macintosh® and Windows® PC operating systems. Music notation software
enables a musician to enter musical data into a computer using either the computer keyboard, a
MIDI- (Musical Instrument Digital Interface) equipped electronic music keyboard or other
MIDI-equipped instruments, and contemporaneously display the data on a computer screen as a musical
score. The dramatic improvements in speed and flexibility provided by software programs like Finale
have made such software the dominant method for composers, arrangers, publishers, and music
teachers to create printed music. With the growth in portable computer display technologies, Finale
also makes it possible for customers to share digital scores for review and performance.
The Finale product is a powerful and comprehensive notation software product which is sold
worldwide. Finale music notation software has a suggested retail price of $600. Finale software is
differentiated from other
7
Table of Contents
music notation software by its breadth and depth of features, including capabilities such as
its hyperscribe feature, its high quality printing required for professional use, customizable
music education worksheets, and inclusion of world class sounds.
We also produce an Academic/Theological Edition of the Finale product that is sold exclusively
to schools, teachers, college students, and religious organizations at a suggested retail price of
$350. This edition has been a key source of revenue and registered user-base growth. In addition,
it reaches a market that is continuously replenished with new student users.
The Finale product is currently translated into German, French, Italian, Swedish, and
Japanese. We believe the international market is a key growth opportunity as computer penetration
increases worldwide. All transactions with our international customers are completed in US
currency.
The Finale Allegro® product, a value-priced version of the powerful Finale music
notation software product, was introduced in 1993. The Allegro music notation software product
currently retails for $199 and contains a subset of the notation tools contained in the Finale
product.
Finale PrintMusic® and Finale SongWriter® are entry-level music notation
software products, retailing for $119.95 and $49.95, respectively. Each contains a subset of the
notation tools contained in the Finale product. These products allow us to offer entry-level
products to the retail customer, thereby expanding the base of registered users and increasing the
potential for sales of notation software upgrades. These products are targeted to a broad audience
in the education and general consumer marketplace. They are both available though our reseller
network as well via download directly from MakeMusic. In addition they are also sold
internationally and available in German, French, Dutch, Italian, and Japanese.
Finale NotePad® is sold as an introduction to the Finale notation family and
provides a quick and easy method to transform musical ideas into printed music. Finale NotePad is
available via download for $9.95. Finale Reader was introduced in 2008 and is a free
download to view, play and print Finale files.
Finale Sales and Marketing
As of December 31, 2010, Finale notation products were sold through approximately 50
distributors serving countries world-wide. In the United States and Canada, the Finale family of
notation products is sold by channel-specific distributors and retailers in the musical instrument,
educational, and consumer electronic channels, as well as directly from our website. Our products
are merchandised through a combination of websites, catalogs, and in-store displays. We support
these efforts with a modest co-op advertising program. We have a domestic distribution agreement
with Hal Leonard Corporation, the largest music publisher in the world, to provide our products to
U.S. and Canadian musical instrument and print music retailers.
Upgrades and trade-ups are marketed and sold exclusively by MakeMusic in North America.
MakeMusic requires all notation products sold in North America to be registered, and we regularly
market upgrades and trade-ups to the registered user database. Each campaign is evaluated based on
the return on investment and against original projections. Finale upgrades were introduced on both
the Windows platform and Macintosh platform in each of the last several years and we intend to
continue this annual upgrade cycle. All Finale products operate on both the Windows and Macintosh
platforms.
Internationally, Finale notation products are represented by key distributors in many overseas
territories. Finale is translated into German, French, Japanese, Swedish, and Italian. MakeMusic
markets a variety of Finale notation education offerings to schools, students, and other qualified
institutions including the Finale Academic edition, the Finale lab pack, and the Finale site
license. The Finale lab pack and Finale site license provide educational discounts for volume
purchases. Education sales have steadily increased, although the mix is shifting towards site
licenses indicating wider acceptance and use of Finale notation software. We believe that this
trend will increase based on the synergistic relationship between Finale and SmartMusic along with
the direct sales teams focus on the education market.
8
Table of Contents
Customers can also utilize Finale software to create accompaniments for use with SmartMusic. A
Finale file is saved as a SmartMusic accompaniment and becomes part of the SmartMusic solution.
This interplay provides MakeMusic with cross-marketing opportunities between Finale and SmartMusic
users and products, and also provides a unique differentiator in the marketplace.
We believe, based on current economic conditions, that Finale notation software revenue will
be relatively stable in 2011. We expect to see a continued shift towards direct notation sales and
lower sales through our distribution channel. Additionally, we will begin offering Finale as a
download starting with the release of our next upgrade which may further accelerate the shift to
direct sales. All other products have previously been available by download. We anticipate holding
our notation development spending on our Finale products generally comparable to historical levels
as a result. We intend to steadily build on our core notation business by continually expanding the
installed base of users, regularly providing them with upgrades, expanding our educational
offerings, increasing the synergy with SmartMusic, and establishing the products as a means for
electronic transmission of music. In addition, we are exploring strategies to expand our reach
outside of the market that we have traditionally served. As a result of this work, we are currently
evaluating additional investments for our notation business.
Finale Competition
The notation market is highly competitive and includes competitors such as, Avid/Sibelius
Software, NOTION Music, Inc., Gvox/Encore, MusScore, and Capella Software. Competitive factors in
marketing Finale products include product features, quality, brand recognition, ease of use,
customer support, merchandising, distribution channels, retail shelf space, and price. We believe
we compete effectively through regular upgrades and marketing initiatives and continue to maintain
dominant market share.
Synergies between SmartMusic and Finale products
From a technology perspective, there are considerable synergies between the SmartMusic
business and the Finale notation business because the products benefit from shared technologies.
The Finale notation technology, for example, is used within SmartMusic to display, among other
things, sheet music, exercises, and beginning band method songs. It is this technology that puts
red and green notes on the screen to show SmartMusic students what they played incorrectly and how
to correct their mistakes. The synergistic integration between SmartMusic and Finale notation
products represents a differentiator for our notation products and provides a barrier to entry into
the marketplace. Likewise, the ability to create SmartMusic repertoire using the Finale product is
a major benefit for SmartMusic customers.
General Information
Customer Support
As of December 31, 2010, customer support for all products is handled by 22 employees and as
of December 31, 2009, our customer support staff totaled 19. They are supported by knowledge-based
software that allows customers to ask questions on-line at www.finalemusic.com and
www.smartmusic.com and then presents them with answers. As new questions are asked by customers,
the database of questions and answers is expanded. This software reduces the number of contacts
reaching customer support employees and thus enhances efficiency, reduces cost, and provides a
better experience for customers.
Principal Sources and Suppliers
Printing of user manuals, packaging, and the manufacture of related materials are performed to
our specifications by outside subcontractors. We currently use one subcontractor to perform
standard copying and assembling services, including copying software DVD and CD-ROM discs, and
assembling the product manuals, discs, and other product literature into packages. If this
subcontractor is unable to perform, there are alternative vendors that we could use for this
service. Our instrumental and vocal microphones are each currently provided by two separate vendors
that are sole source suppliers. We believe there are alternative vendors available if our
subcontractors are unable to supply microphones.
Dependence on Major Customers
As of December 31, 2010 no distributor or direct customer for either our SmartMusic or Finale
products represented more than 10% of total revenue.
9
Table of Contents
Product Development
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, there were 51 and 54 employees, respectively involved in
product development for SmartMusic and Finale products at MakeMusic. This staff engages in research
and development of new products, enhancements to existing products, business systems support,
repertoire development, and quality assurance testing.
MakeMusics non-capitalized expenditures for product development were $5,524,000 and
$5,081,000 in 2010 and 2009, representing 32.2% and 30.9% of gross revenues, respectively. These
expenses include the costs for our annual notation upgrades, product maintenance releases and
support for our business systems. We expect these costs to moderately increase in 2011 due to
enhancements in our technology infrastructure required to support our expanding SmartMusic customer
base, development investments to increase the business model flexibility in SmartMusic, and
potential additional investments in notation products aimed at expanding our reach outside of the
market we have traditionally served.
Trademarks
We own the registered trademarks in the United States for Allegro®,
Coda®, Finale®, Finale Allegro®, Finale NotePad®,
Finale Performance Assessment®, Finale PrintMusic®, Finale
SongWriter®, Finale Viewer ®, FinaleScript®, FPA®,
HumanPlayback®, HyperScribe®, Intelligent Accompaniment®,
Intonation Trainer®, M!®, MakeMusic®, MicNotator®,
SmartMusic®, SmartMusic Impact®, StudioView®, SmartFind and
Paint®, and TempoTap®. In addition, the names Finale®, Finale
NotePad®, Finale PrintMusic®, Finale SongWriter®, Finale
Viewer ®, Intelligent Accompaniment®, MakeMusic®,
SmartMusic®, and The Art of Music Notation® have been protected in some
foreign countries. We have applied for trademark registration in the United States for Finale
Reader. In addition to our own registered trademarks listed above, this report also
contains references to trademarks owned by third parties.
Technology Infrastructure
The MakeMusic data center is comprised of both on and offsite facilities. During 2010, we also
expanded the MakeMusic data center to the cloud by utilizing Microsofts Azure platform. Data
centers are operated internally and offer extensive uptime and connectivity to the Internet
backbone via fiber-optic connections. Storage Area Networks and servers utilizing redundant arrays
of independent discs for information backup as well as redundant power provide our foundation for
simplified storage administration, server consolidation and virtualization. Websites and services
are run on Microsoft IIS® and our databases are run on Microsoft SQL Server®.
MakeMusic utilizes a VoIP phone system that provides unified messaging and is deeply integrated
with Microsoft Active Directory and Microsoft Exchange. Our network is monitored twenty-four hours
a day, seven days a week, and is scalable and upgradeable for future growth
The extension of our data center into the cloud using Microsofts Azure platform has allowed
us to take advantage of Microsofts SaaS (Software as a Service) model. We are able to provide
rapid scalability to meet our customer needs, as well as familiar tools and a development
environment that works seamlessly with our existing data centers.
MakeMusic Websites:
www.smartmusic.com. The SmartMusic website promotes our SmartMusic subscriptions and
SmartMusic accessories.
www.finalemusic.com. The Finale website promotes notation products and e-commerce with
mail-order fulfillment, as well as downloads of Finale NotePad.
www.makemusic.com. The MakeMusic website includes information on the Company and our
products. It also provides links to www.smartmusic.com and www.finalemusic.com for
people wanting to make purchases of our products.
10
Table of Contents
Available Information
All reports filed electronically by MakeMusic with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC), including its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports
on Form 8-K, proxy and information statements, other information and amendments to those reports
filed (if applicable), are accessible at no cost by contacting the Investor Relations department at
MakeMusic. These filings are also accessible on the SECs website at www.sec.gov. The
public may read and copy any materials filed by MakeMusic with the SEC at the SECs Public
Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may also obtain information
from the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
Cautionary Statements
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Reform Act) provides a safe harbor
for forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. We have made, and may continue to make,
various written or verbal forward-looking statements with respect to business and financial
matters, including statements contained in this document, other filings with the SEC and reports to
shareholders. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations or forecasts of future events
and can be identified by the use of terminology such as believe, estimate, expect, intend,
may, could, will and similar words or expressions. Forward-looking statements speak only as
of the date on which they are made.
Our forward-looking statements generally relate to the following: expectations regarding an
extension of the lease for our headquarters facility; beliefs about our ability to compete in the
music software industry; expectations and beliefs relating to our vendors, contractors and
suppliers; beliefs about the impact of intellectual property and licensing rights and our ability
to develop, license and maintain intellectual property rights in the future; expectations relating
to our business model and strategy; expectations relating to development, production, marketing and
other expenses; intentions and expectations relating to growth initiatives for our notation and
SmartMusic product lines, improvements to our technological infrastructure, and the effects these
improvements will have on our financial results; expectations regarding our method of selling and
delivering our product; beliefs relating to the market penetration of our products, including
expectations in regard to subscription rates, site agreements, international sales, synergies
between our products lines, and sales; expectations regarding our results of operations; beliefs
with respect to realization of deferred tax assets and our intent to retain earnings for use in
operations. Forward-looking statements cannot be guaranteed and actual results may vary materially
due to the uncertainties and risks, known and unknown, associated with such statements. We do not
intend to update any forward-looking statements unless required by law. We wish to caution
investors that the following important factors, among others, in some cases have affected and in
the future could affect our actual results of operations and cause such results to differ
materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements made in this document and elsewhere
by us or on our behalf. It is not possible to foresee or identify all factors that could cause
actual results to differ from expected or historic results. As such, investors should not consider
any list of such factors to be an exhaustive statement of all risks, uncertainties, or potentially
inaccurate assumptions.
We currently believe that we have sufficient capital, but we may have other future capital
needs. We again achieved positive operating cash flow in 2010 and expect it to continue to be
positive in the future, provided we continue to increase revenue and manage expenses. We believe
our cash reserves are sufficient to execute our strategies. If we do not maintain positive cash
flow, we may need additional capital in the form of debt or equity financing to continue to operate
the business. Additional capital may be needed if there is a significant change in our business
plan or operating results. There is no assurance that additional debt or equity financing will be
available to us on favorable terms or at all.
We are dependent upon our new product development efforts. Additional development work is
required to increase the breadth of and provide periodic upgrades to our SmartMusic and Finale
products and expand the accompaniment repertoire for SmartMusic. There can be no assurance that our
timetable for any of our development plans will be achieved, that sufficient development resources
will be available, or that development efforts will be successful.
We are dependent upon the Internet in our business. We are dependent on the Internet to
activate our SmartMusic subscriptions and secure our licensed content. We also utilize the Internet
as one of our order-processing
11
Table of Contents
channels. Critical issues concerning the commercial use of the Internet, including security,
cost, ease of use and access, intellectual property ownership, and other legal liability issues,
remain unresolved and could materially and adversely affect both the growth of Internet usage
generally and our business in particular. If we experience problems developing and maintaining our
Internet operations, our sales, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely
affected.
We are dependent upon obtaining and maintaining license agreements with music publishers, of
which there are a limited number. The world market for music license rights is highly concentrated
among a limited number of publishers. We have entered into license agreements with leading music
publishers that provide access to certain musical titles for accompaniment development. Many of our
contracts with major publishers are not exclusive, which means that similar agreements may be made
with competitors or that the publishers themselves may sell the same titles. While we believe that
our relationships with these publishers are good, there can be no assurance that we will be able to
maintain or expand these relationships. The lack of a sufficient number and variety of musical
arrangements would greatly limit the ability to market our products and services.
Certain of our products have limited and fluctuating sales. Sales of our SmartMusic
subscription products have not achieved, and may not achieve, significant levels. Further, internet
sales have fluctuated, as have sales of Finale products, which are historically higher following
the release of product upgrades. We believe that results of operations may fluctuate as a result
of, among other things, the purchasing cycle of the education market and the timing of releases of
new products and product upgrades. Certain states have had significant budget deficits and
education funding cuts, which could negatively impact sales of products to the education market.
Additionally, we have rapidly expanded our direct educational sales organization. There is no
guarantee that our sales strategy will result in increased SmartMusic subscriptions. We may also
have limited success retaining sales personnel.
The uncertainty in worldwide economic conditions may divert consumer spending from our
products. The spending habits of our target group of students and their families are often impacted
by general economic conditions. If the improvement of economic conditions remains uncertain in the
United States or internationally, our target customers discretionary income and purchasing
decisions may change. This could negatively impact Notation sales, SmartMusic subscription rates
and accessory sales.
We have incurred operating losses in the past and may incur losses in the future. While we
have been profitable for the past six years, we have incurred losses from operations in the past
and may incur such losses in the future. In order to continue to develop our business and planned
product and service offerings, we will be required to continue to devote capital to, among other
things, marketing and development efforts, including, potential, new notation product offerings.
There can be no assurance that we will operate profitably or provide an economic return to
investors.
We face intense competition. While competition for SmartMusic is relatively limited, there can
be no assurance, in spite of significant barriers to entry, that others, such as large electronic
and musical instrument manufacturers, will not enter this market. Competition for our notation
products could potentially adversely impact future sales levels. Our ability to continue to compete
effectively will be substantially dependent upon our ability to continue to improve our product
offerings, Internet resources along with our sales and marketing initiatives. If such improvements
and development efforts do not materialize as intended, we may lose our ability to differentiate
our products from those of our competitors. In addition, increasing competition in the music
software market could cause prices to fall and the volume of transactions to decline, either of
which could adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Rapid technological changes and obsolescence may adversely affect our business. We operate in
an industry greatly affected by technological changes. While we are not currently aware of any
significant technological changes that may affect our current technology base, continued
advancements in computer software, hardware, and network designs and formats may impact our ability
to effectively maintain our Internet-based sales efforts in a workable and user-friendly format.
The proprietary technology we use to protect access to our licensed files may be effective for only
a limited period by reason of technological change. We must, therefore, devote new resources to
improve or modify this security system, which is a critical aspect of our ability to establish and
maintain relationships with music publishers. While we currently believe that we have sufficient
resources to address technological changes
12
Table of Contents
that may affect our business, there can be no assurance that any such technological changes
will not prove too much for us to overcome in a cost-effective manner.
The success of our web-based products and services is dependent upon our ability to protect
user information and comply with data protection laws and regulations. In connection with the use
of our web-based products, users provide us with certain personal information. The collection, use,
disclosure or security of personal information or other privacy-related matters are regulated by
applicable data protection laws. While we strive to comply with all applicable data protection laws
and regulations, as well as our own posted privacy policies, any failure or perceived failure to
comply may result in proceedings or actions against us by government entities, individuals or
others, which could potentially have an adverse effect on our business. Further, federal, state,
and international regulations regarding privacy and data protection may become more stringent in
the future, which could increase our cost of compliance,
In addition, as our SmartMusic Gradebook product is web-based, the amount of data we store for
our users on our servers (including personal information) has been increasing. Any systems failure
or compromise of our security that results in the release of our users data could seriously limit
the adoption of our products as well as harm our reputation and brand and, therefore, our business.
We may also need to expend significant resources to protect against system failure or security
breaches. The risk that these types of events could seriously harm our business is likely to
increase as we expand the number of subscribers to our products.
We are dependent upon key personnel. Our performance is closely linked to the performance of
our management and key personnel. Recently, we have made significant changes among our executives
and key personnel. Such changes, and the time and costs associated with locating and integrating
replacements, could affect our ability to execute our strategic plans.
We are dependent upon proprietary technology and cannot assure protection of such technology.
There can be no assurance that our proprietary technology will provide us with significant
competitive advantages, that other companies will not develop substantially equivalent technology,
or that we will be able to protect our technologies. We could incur substantial costs in seeking
enforcement of our patents or in defending ourselves against patent infringement claims by others.
Further, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain or maintain patent protection in
the markets in which we intend to offer products.
International development plans are subject to numerous risks. There can be no guarantee that
our international expansion efforts will be successful or that we will be able to offset the cost
of the resources allocated to such efforts. Moreover, we could be faced with the risks inherent in
any international development, such as unpredictable changes in export restrictions, barriers, and
customs rates; currency risks; the difficulty of managing foreign operations; the differences in
technological standards, payment terms and labor laws and practices among countries; collection
problems; political instabilities; seasonal reductions in business; and unforeseen taxes. Such risk
factors could harm our international operations and, therefore, our business, operating results,
and financial condition.
The market price of our stock may experience volatility. We cannot speculate as to the future
market price of our common stock. Our common stock has experienced, and may continue to experience,
significant price volatility due to a number of factors, including fluctuations in operating
results, changes in market perspectives for our products, developments in our industry, and general
market conditions that may be unrelated to our performance.
We will be exposed to risks relating to evaluations of controls required by Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Changing laws, regulations, and standards relating to corporate governance and
public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related regulations implemented by the SEC,
are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs, and
making some activities more time consuming. We will continue to evaluate our internal controls
systems to allow management to report on our internal controls. We have performed the system and
process evaluation and testing (and any necessary remediation) required to comply with the
management certification requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. If we fail to
maintain effective controls and procedures, we may be unable to provide the required financial
information in a timely and reliable manner. Further, if we acquire any business in the future, we
may incur substantial additional costs to bring the acquired business systems into compliance with
Section 404.
13
Table of Contents
Significant management judgment is required for certain financial statement entries. As
explained in more detail in Item 7 below under the heading Critical Accounting Policies, the
preparation of our financial statements requires management to make significant estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. For
example, during 2009, based upon our operating results in recent years and through December 31,
2009 as well as an assessment of our expected future results of operations, we determined that it
had become more likely than not that we would realize a portion of our net deferred tax assets. As
a result, during the fourth quarter of 2009, we released $2,564,000 of our valuation allowance. If
managements assumptions were inaccurate or managements judgment was otherwise erroneous, we may
be required to adjust the valuation allowance in subsequent financial reporting periods. In
addition, future utilization of NOL carry-forwards is subject to certain limitations under Section
382 of the Internal Revenue Code, and our ability to use NOLs in the future will be limited.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our corporate facility is leased under an operating lease arrangement and consists of
approximately 22,000 square feet of office and warehouse space at 7615 Golden Triangle Drive, Suite
M, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, 55344. Rent and maintenance over the remaining lease term are
approximately $250,000 on an annual basis and the lease expires March 31, 2011. We are currently
negotiating an extension of our existing lease, which we expect to provide approximately 3,000
additional square feet to our current corporate facility. We expect the term of the lease extension
to be five years and to be on terms and rates generally comparable to our existing lease. We
anticipate that we will finalize these negotiations by the end of March 2011. We believe our leased
space will be adequate for the foreseeable future.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
As previously disclosed in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, on
September 14, 2010, a complaint was filed against us by Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Singapore
Private Limited (collectively Uniloc) in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Texas. The complaint alleges infringement of Unilocs patent for securely registering
software and other digital media to prevent illicit copying and software piracy and seeks a
permanent injunction. In addition, Uniloc is seeking compensatory damages in an unspecified amount,
and interest, costs and expenses associated with the litigation. We are one of approximately 60
companies that have been similarly sued by Uniloc. Further, the United States Patent and Trademark
Office recently issued an initial rejection for all of the claims of the Uniloc patent at issue in
the litigation. Management believes that the claims involved in the suit are without merit and does
not expect the litigation to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
or results of operations. We will, however, incur costs and diversion of management resources in
defending the infringement claim. Moreover, because litigation is inherently uncertain, we cannot
guarantee that the outcome of this litigation will be favorable to us or that material damages will
not be awarded against us.
In the ordinary course of business, we may be party to additional legal actions, proceedings,
or claims. Corresponding costs are accrued when it is reasonably possible that loss will be
incurred and the amount can be precisely or reasonably estimated. We are not aware of any actual or
threatened litigation that would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or
results of operations.
ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
14
Table of Contents
PART II
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Market Information
Our common stock trades on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol MMUS. The following
table sets forth the high and low sales prices of our common stock for the periods set forth:
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||||||
First Quarter | $ | 6.82 | $ | 4.06 | $ | 4.50 | $ | 1.86 | ||||||||||||
Common Stock |
Second Quarter | 6.28 | 5.06 | 3.90 | 2.31 | |||||||||||||||
Third Quarter | 6.16 | 4.82 | 4.05 | 2.61 | ||||||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter | 7.00 | 4.64 | 5.00 | 3.06 |
As of December 31, 2010, we had 111 registered shareholders.
Dividends
We have never paid cash dividends on any of our securities. We do not currently anticipate
paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities
There were no sales of unregistered securities during the quarter or year ended December 31,
2010 that have not been previously reported.
For information on our equity compensation plans, refer to Item 12, Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information required
by this Item.
15
Table of Contents
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
Executive Overview
MakeMusics mission is to develop and market solutions that transform how music is composed,
taught, learned and performed. This is accomplished by:
| Providing integrated technology, content and web services to enhance and expand how music is taught, learned and prepared for performance. | ||
| Providing music education content developers with a technology-enriched publishing platform that leverages their copyrighted assets while simultaneously increasing the content and value of the SmartMusic library. | ||
| Offering software solutions for engraving and electronically distributing sheet music. |
MakeMusic develops and markets two product lines, SmartMusic® learning software for
band, jazz ensemble, orchestra and voice and Finale® music notation software. We believe
these innovative products reinforce each others features and competitiveness and will allow us to
continue to achieve positive operating results. The well-established Finale family of music
notation software products provides a solid base business that serves a large customer base and
generates consistent revenue through sales of new products, annual upgrades and trade-up campaigns.
While our existing notation products enjoy leading market positions, in the fourth quarter of
2010, we began the process of evaluating the potential to expand our reach outside of the market we
have traditionally served with the assistance of an outside strategic consulting firm. As a result
of this work, we are currently evaluating additional investments for our notation business.
Our fiscal year 2010 resulted in continued sales growth for MakeMusic and, overall, a 4%
increase over 2009 net revenue was achieved. SmartMusic revenue grew 20% due to our year over year
subscription growth from 133,782 to 162,189 and price increases implemented in the third quarter of
2010, from $130 to $140 for teacher subscriptions and from $30 to $36 for student subscriptions.
Notation revenue decreased 3% overall, which we attribute primarily to reductions in our sales to
distribution partners, offset by stronger direct sales of our Finale products and downloads. Gross
margin percentages were comparable at 83% in 2010 and 84% in 2009. Operating expenses increased in
2010, due to increased selling and marketing expenses as a result of the planned growth of
marketing staff and expansion of our direct sales force. Development expenses also increased
primarily due to consulting expenses incurred to support the release of SmartMusic 2011 and for the
review of future notation product direction. Our net income before taxes in 2010 was $551,000
compared to $959,000 in 2009. Additionally, we reported a significant tax benefit in 2009. This tax
benefit resulted primarily from reducing our valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets by
$2,564,000 that represented managements estimate of the realizability of our deferred tax assets.
During 2010, we have maintained our policy established in the fourth quarter of 2009 of recording a
deferred tax asset representing tax on three years of forecasted income, there continues to be
enough uncertainty around our ability to forecast beyond three years that this policy is prudent.
The primary uncertainties relate to technological changes beyond three years potentially impacting
our Notation products. The tax benefit in 2010 was $461,000. As a result of the factors mentioned,
we reported net income of approximately $1,012,000 in 2010 compared to net income of $3,453,000 in
2009.
We believe our greatest growth potential lies with SmartMusic, a subscription-based product
directed toward the very large and constantly renewing market of music students and their teachers.
SmartMusic combines a software application, a library of thousands of music titles,
skill-development exercises and a web service to provide students with a compelling experience and
teachers with the realistic means to document the progress of every student.
SmartMusic software enhances and transforms the hours spent practicing by putting students
inside a professional band or orchestra so that they can hear how the music is supposed to be
performed and how their part fits in. This makes practicing much more engaging, causing students to
practice longer and more often. SmartMusic
16
Table of Contents
provides access to an ever-increasing library of band, jazz ensemble and orchestra literature.
Each title includes individual part assignments authored by respected educators, thereby providing
music teachers with a time-saving solution for preparing selections for their next
performance. SmartMusic also offers a rich variety of effective practice tools that make
practice time more efficient and productive. The combination of making practice time more engaging
and productive leads to rapid student skill-development, increased student confidence, higher
student retention, and stronger music programs.
SmartMusic Gradebook is a web-based grade book that is included with each teacher subscription
designed to manage student assignments, grades, and recordings while documenting the progress of
each student and assessing student achievement. This provides music educators (and students) with
exciting new possibilities to assist in developing strong music programs and complying with
accountability requirements. SmartMusic Gradebook enables teachers to easily send assignments to
each of their students. Students complete the assignment on their home computer, provided that they
have a SmartMusic subscription, or on a school computer equipped with SmartMusic. Submitted
assignments are automatically graded and posted in the teachers SmartMusic Gradebook thereby
providing teachers with the visible means for measuring student achievement.
Our educational sales organization focuses on direct school district sales aimed at the 17,000
schools who match our ideal demographic profile. We sell site agreements that provide discounts
for volume purchases. The SmartMusic quarterly site agreement totals are shown in the SmartMusic
metrics table below.
In addition to tracking the total number of subscriptions, we track the number of teachers who
use SmartMusic Gradebook and the number of those teachers who are using SmartMusic Gradebook to
deliver and manage student assignments to fifty students or more. As of December 31, 2010, we
reported 1,019 Gradebook teachers compared to 886 Gradebook teachers as of December 31, 2009.
The following table illustrates our quarterly SmartMusic metrics:
Dec-09 | Mar-10 | Jun-10 | Sep-10 | Dec-10 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Subscriptions |
133,782 | 139,363 | 143,095 | 158,574 | 162,189 | |||||||||||||||
Educator Accounts |
9,269 | 9,368 | 9,073 | 9,312 | 9,402 | |||||||||||||||
Educators who have issued assignments* |
1,857 | 2,340 | 2,379 | 1,085 | 2,040 | |||||||||||||||
Gradebook Teachers* |
886 | 1,156 | 1,172 | 415 | 1,019 | |||||||||||||||
Site Agreements |
322 | 356 | 372 | 466 | 485 | |||||||||||||||
Site Agreement Educator Subscriptions |
2,181 | 2,458 | 2,532 | 3,403 | 3,343 |
* | Annual statistics that restart on July 1 of each year reflecting the start of the school-year cycle |
The SmartMusic target business model is to have music educators increase their use of
SmartMusic Gradebook to set up their classes, enroll students and issue assignments, which we
believe would result in an increase in student subscriptions. As stated above, 2,040, or 22%, of
the teachers who have purchased SmartMusic have utilized SmartMusic Gradebook, and those teachers
have 130,424 students receiving SmartMusic assignments.
We increased the size of our educational sales force from 5 to 7 and our marketing staff from
8 to 9 in 2010 to strengthen our strategic sales and marketing initiatives. We expect to continue
to aggressively invest in expanding our sales force to increase the penetration level of our target
market. In addition, our development efforts have focused on improving and simplifying the
SmartMusic purchase process, Gradebook class set-up, student enrollment and SmartMusic assignments.
The overall objective is to make these processes easy and intuitive for both teachers and students.
As a result of the increased focus of our direct sales force and product enhancements, site
agreement educator subscriptions increased 53%, from 2,181 at December 31, 2009, to 3,343 at
December 31, 2010.
We believe that our technological investments in SmartMusic have created a digital pipeline
between our growing subscriber base of more than 160,000 and the music publishers who provide
SmartMusic content. This growing platform is a strategic asset for MakeMusic and we are focusing on
finding additional ways to monetize it. As a result, we expect to make additional investments in
development to leverage the SmartMusic platform and to increase our business model flexibility.
17
Table of Contents
The following table illustrates the net new SmartMusic subscriptions for each quarter for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010:
Quarterly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter End | Beginning | New | Renewed | Renewal | Subscriptions | Quarter End | Net New | |||||||||||||||||||||
Date | Subscriptions | Subscriptions | Subscriptions | Rate | Ended | Subscriptions | Subscriptions | |||||||||||||||||||||
3/31/2009 |
106,584 | 10,609 | 12,241 | 64 | % | 19,116 | 110,318 | 3,734 | ||||||||||||||||||||
6/30/2009 |
110,318 | 5,256 | 11,350 | 72 | % | 15,865 | 111,059 | 741 | ||||||||||||||||||||
9/30/2009 |
111,059 | 24,456 | 29,585 | 70 | % | 42,523 | 122,577 | 11,518 | ||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/2009 |
122,577 | 20,122 | 26,402 | 75 | % | 35,319 | 133,782 | 11,205 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3/31/2010 |
133,782 | 11,590 | 15,330 | 72 | % | 21,339 | 139,363 | 5,581 | ||||||||||||||||||||
6/30/2010 |
139,363 | 5,391 | 14,069 | 89 | % | 15,728 | 143,095 | 3,732 | ||||||||||||||||||||
9/30/2010 |
143,095 | 23,826 | 47,383 | 85 | % | 55,730 | 158,574 | 15,479 | ||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/2010 |
158,574 | 20,453 | 29,065 | 63 | % | 45,903 | 162,189 | 3,615 |
We define renewed subscriptions as those subscriptions that customers purchase within the
two-month period after their prior subscription ended. Because of changes to the start of school
from year to year as well as fluctuations in the date that music teachers implement their
curriculum, we commonly see subscribers that have a delay of up to two months in renewing their
subscription. As a result, we believe that using the above definition of a renewal more accurately
reflects the renewal rate for SmartMusic subscriptions. In the fourth quarter of 2010, the
SmartMusic renewal rate declined from prior quarters. We believe this can be attributed to the
price increase that was implemented during the third quarter that resulted in early renewals and
purchases prior to the increase. The renewal rate during the last six months of 2010 was 75%
compared to 72% during the last six months of 2009. Additionally, there were some educators who
delayed adoption of SmartMusic due to the late release and product functionality delays in
SmartMusic 2011 Gradebook.
We have achieved positive cash flow from operations for the last six years, including the most
recent year ended December 31, 2010. Our quarterly results will fluctuate as a result of the
seasonality of the education market. Due to current economic conditions and concerns over school
budgets, we remain cautious regarding our future financial projections. However, with increased
revenues and, in particular, the growth in SmartMusic subscriptions, plus improvements in
operational efficiency over the last few years and the establishment of contingency plans to be
implemented if our revenue and cash flow objectives are not met, we feel that we can continue to
achieve positive operating cash flow for the next twelve months.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make significant
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods
presented. We believe that the following are some of the more critical judgment areas in the
application of our accounting policies that currently affect our financial position and results of
operations.
Allowance for doubtful accounts. Our distribution of notation products in domestic and
international markets through independent dealers and distributors concentrates relatively large
amounts of receivables in relatively few customer accounts; however, none are greater than 10% of
the total revenue. Some international customers pay for the product prior to shipment; domestic
dealers and distributors who do not prepay are granted payment terms and credit limits based on
credit checks and account history. We have successfully done business with most of our dealers and
distributors for many years. There were no significant uncollectible accounts in 2010 or 2009.
Any sales directly to home users are prepaid and schools submit purchase orders for purchases.
MakeMusic records an accrual for potential non-payments, which has historically been sufficient to
cover uncollected accounts. Financial conditions in international markets and economic conditions
can change quickly and our allowance for doubtful accounts cannot anticipate all potential changes.
18
Table of Contents
Sales returns and allowance reserves. SmartMusic teacher subscriptions automatically renew at
the end of their subscription period. Notices of renewal are sent to the teacher in advance and an
invoice is sent upon the renewal date. A reserve is booked for those subscriptions that
automatically renew and are subsequently cancelled due to teacher relocation, teacher cancellation,
or non-payment of accounts. The reserve is then evaluated quarterly to determine if any adjustments
are necessary.
When a new version of Finale is released, dealers and distributors retain the right to return
any unsold versions of the prior release (normally 10% of total prior year sales) in exchange for
an equal number of units of the updated version of the product that is returned. The history of
these returns is tracked and revenue is deferred based on the expected return rate until the new
product is released, at which time the product may be returned for credit provided the customer
places an equivalent (number of units) order for the new version.
Inventory valuation. Inventories consisting of packaged product, materials and accessories
are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined on a weighted average cost
method. We record a provision to adjust slow-moving and obsolete inventories to the lower of cost
or market based on historical experience and current product demand. The carrying value of
inventory is evaluated at least quarterly and adjusted as needed. Inventory is reviewed for
obsolescence when the inventory is no longer used in products in their most current released
version.
Stock based compensation. Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718, Compensation Stock
Compensation, (formerly known as SFAS 123R) requires us to measure and recognize in our Statements
of Income the expense associated with all share-based payment awards made to employees and
directors based on estimated fair values. We utilize the Black-Scholes option valuation model to
measure the amount of compensation expense we recognize for each option award. There are several
assumptions that we must make when using the Black-Scholes model such as the expected term of each
option, the expected volatility of the stock price during the expected term of the option, the
expected dividends payable, and the risk free interest rate expected during the option term. Of
these assumptions, the expected term of the options and expected volatility of our common stock are
the most difficult to estimate since they are based on the exercise behavior of employees and the
expected future performance of our stock.
Capitalized software costs. Costs incurred in the development of software products are
capitalized in accordance with ASC 985-20, Software Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or
Marketed, (formerly known as FAS 86) which requires the capitalization of certain software
development costs incurred after technological feasibility is established. Technological
feasibility is established when the detailed program design and all planning and testing activities
are completed. Capitalization of computer software costs shall cease when a product is available
for general release to customers. We capitalize the costs of producing any new software product,
which includes individual song titles to be included as repertoire with the SmartMusic product. The
estimated economic life of SmartMusic Gradebook, whose capitalization and market introduction was
completed in 2007, has been established as five years. This five-year amortization period is
consistent with the initial licensing term for the large ensemble titles available in SmartMusic
that have pre-authored assignments for use by teachers within SmartMusic Gradebook. Similarly, upon
release of a large ensemble song title into SmartMusic, we amortize the related capitalized
software costs over the estimated life of the song, not to exceed the five-year licensing period. A
reserve is recorded for an estimate of song titles that will not be released. Annual development of
notation products consists of maintenance costs that are expensed as incurred. We will continue to
review our amortization period for capitalized software costs as considered necessary based upon
any new information and information gained in our review of the net realizable value of unamortized
costs.
Post contract support. We account for software maintenance offered on our Notation products
in accordance with ASC 985-605, Software Software Revenue Recognition, (formerly AICPA SOP 97-2)
which states that revenue for post-contract support (PCS) may be recognized upon the initial sale
when PCS is included with the initial license, the cost of providing PCS during the arrangement is
insignificant, there are no unspecified upgrades, and only minor bug fixes are offered to licensed
users. However, the estimated related costs are accrued in the same period that the sales price is
recognized. We provide unlimited, free telephone, e-mail, and on-line technical support to our
customers and, therefore, accrue an estimated cost of future support for our notation products in
the period of sale.
19
Table of Contents
Impairment of goodwill. We review goodwill for potential impairment at least annually or when
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may be impaired. We have
assigned all of our goodwill to the Notation reporting unit and compare the fair value of this
reporting unit (effective January 2009), as computed primarily by applying a combination of income
and market valuation approaches, to its book carrying value, including goodwill (step 1). If the
fair value exceeds the carrying value, no further work is required and no impairment loss is
recognized. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, the goodwill of the reporting unit is
potentially impaired and we would then complete step 2 to arrive at an implied fair value of the
goodwill, by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets (including
unrecognized intangible assets) and liabilities of the reporting unit from the fair value of the
reporting unit. If the implied fair value of the goodwill is less than the reported value of
goodwill, we would recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference. The assessment of
potential impairment requires certain judgments and estimates by us, including the determination of
an event indicating impairment, the future cash flows to be generated by reporting units, the risks
associated with those cash flows, and the discount rate to be utilized.
Income taxes. We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method provided by
ASC 740, Income taxes (formerly FAS 109). We estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions
in which we operate and account for income taxes payable as part of the preparation of our
financial statements. This process involves estimating our actual current tax expense as well as
assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as depreciation
and amortization, for financial and tax reporting purposes. These differences result in deferred
tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our balance sheet to the extent deemed
realizable. We assess the likelihood that, and the extent to which, our deferred tax assets will be
realized and establish a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which
realization is more likely than not. If we increase or decrease a valuation allowance in a given
period, then we must increase or decrease the tax provision in our statements of income.
As of December 31, 2010, we had U.S. net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately
$15,771,000, Minnesota net operating loss carry-forwards of $5,946,000, and research and
development tax credits of $1,164,000 and Minnesota research and development tax credits of
$490,000. The losses and tax credits are carried forward for federal and state corporate income
taxes and may be used to reduce future taxes.
Significant management judgment is required in determining any valuation allowance recorded
against our net deferred tax assets. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2009, we remained uncertain on
how economic conditions would impact our back to school selling cycle and annual financial results.
Based upon our strong performance in the fourth quarter of 2009, our operating results in recent
years and an assessment of our expected future results of operations, we determined in 2009 that it
had become more likely than not that we would realize a portion of our net deferred tax assets. As
a result, during the fourth quarter of 2009, we reduced our valuation allowance by $2,564,000,
representing the approximate estimated tax on three years of forecasted net income. During 2010, we
have maintained our policy established in the fourth quarter of 2009 of recording a deferred tax
asset representing tax on three years of forecasted income. There continues to be enough
uncertainty around our ability to forecast beyond three years that this policy is prudent. The
primary uncertainties relate to technological changes beyond three years potentially impacting our
notation products. Due to uncertainties related to our ability to utilize the balance of our
deferred tax assets, as of December 31, 2010 we have maintained a valuation allowance of
$5,690,000. Should the remaining $5,690,000 valuation allowance be reversed in the future, a
liability of $3,175,000 would have to be established for uncertain tax positions.
As required by ASC 740, Income taxes, we recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax
position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain
the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the
amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50
percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority.
In addition, future utilization of NOL carry-forwards is subject to certain limitations under
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. This section generally relates to a 50 percent change in
ownership of a company over a three-year period. The acquisition of additional shares by a greater
than 5% shareholder in January 2007 resulted in an ownership change under Section 382.
Accordingly, our ability to use NOLs in the future will be limited.
20
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2010 to the year ended December 31, 2009
Net Revenue ($ in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Incr (Decr) | % | |||||||||||||
Notation |
$ | 10,712 | $ | 11,060 | ($348 | ) | -3 | % | ||||||||
SmartMusic |
6,436 | 5,382 | 1,054 | 20 | % | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 17,148 | $ | 16,442 | $ | 706 | 4 | % | ||||||||
Net revenue increased 4% from $16,442,000 in 2009 to $17,148,000 in 2010.
Notation revenue decreased $348,000 from $11,060,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 to
$10,712,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. Notation revenue decreased in 2010 due to
reductions in our sales to our distribution partners, offset by stronger direct sales of our Finale
products and downloads.
SmartMusic revenue increased by $1,054,000 from $5,382,000 for the year ended December 31,
2009 to $6,436,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase in revenue reflects the
continued growth of the SmartMusic product that was originally launched in 2001 and the SmartMusic
Gradebook product that was released in 2007. It also reflects the expansion of our SmartMusic site
agreement program which encourages school district deployment of SmartMusic student subscriptions
and our direct sales force which focuses on district level sales. As of December 31, 2010, there
were 485 site agreements for SmartMusic compared to 322 site agreements as of December 31,
2009.
SmartMusic is sold to schools, students and music organization members on a subscription
basis. Revenue for these subscriptions is recognized over the life of the subscription which is
typically 12 months. Total earned SmartMusic subscription revenue for the year ended December 31,
2010 was $4,970,000, an increase of $1,025,000, or 26%, over the year ended December 31, 2009. This
increase is due to the increase in the total number of subscriptions as well as a price increase in
the third quarter of 2010 when teacher subscriptions increased from $130 to $140 and student
subscriptions increased from $30 to $36. Total unearned SmartMusic subscription revenue (deferred
revenue) was $3,633,000 as of December 31, 2010, an increase of $799,000, or 28%, over the balance
at December 31, 2009. Deferred SmartMusic revenue represents the future revenue to be recorded on
current subscriptions.
SmartMusic has shown sustained growth since its launch. As of December 31, 2010, 9,402 schools
have purchased SmartMusic, an increase of 1% over the 9,269 schools that had purchased it as of
December 31, 2009. Total SmartMusic subscriptions as of December 31, 2010 numbered 162,189,
representing a net gain of 28,407, or 21%, over the December 31, 2009 subscription count of
133,782.
SmartMusic Gradebook is a web-based service that is designed to manage student assignments,
recordings and grades while documenting the progress of each student and assessing student
achievement. We track the number of teachers who use SmartMusic Gradebook and the number of those
teachers who are using SmartMusic Gradebook to deliver and manage student assignments to 50 or more
students (Gradebook teachers). As of December 31, 2010, we had 1,019 Gradebook teachers compared to
886 Gradebook teachers as of December 31, 2009. This is an annual statistic, counting only teachers
who have issued assignments to 50 or more students during a school fiscal year. The number of
Gradebook teachers restarts at zero on July 1 of each year to correspond with the start of the
school year.
Many SmartMusic customers, especially new customers, also purchase accessories (primarily
microphones and foot pedals) that are used with the software. Revenue for the sales of accessories,
included in the SmartMusic revenue category, for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $1,000,000,
which was comparable to revenue of $953,000 for SmartMusic accessories for the year ended December
31, 2009.
21
Table of Contents
Gross Profit ($ in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Incr (Decr) | % | |||||||||||||
Notation |
$ | 9,874 | $ | 10,120 | ($246 | ) | -2 | % | ||||||||
SmartMusic |
4,441 | 3,724 | 717 | 19 | % | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 14,315 | $ | 13,844 | $ | 471 | 3 | % | ||||||||
Gross profit increased by $471,000 from $13,844,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009, to
$14,315,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. Notation gross profit declined due to the decline
in revenue through our distribution partners. SmartMusic gross profit increased due to the increase
in SmartMusic revenue, which resulted from an increased number of subscribers and subscription
price increases. Cost of revenue includes product costs, royalties paid to publishers, amortization
of capitalized software development costs for repertoire and SmartMusic Gradebook software
development costs, shipping, and credit card fees. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 83%
and 84%, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Development expense ($ in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Incr (Decr) | % | |||||||||||||
Notation |
$ | 2,531 | $ | 1,898 | $ | 633 | 33 | % | ||||||||
SmartMusic |
1,957 | 1,937 | 20 | 1 | % | |||||||||||
Other |
1,036 | 1,246 | (210 | ) | -17 | % | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 5,524 | $ | 5,081 | $ | 443 | 9 | % | ||||||||
Development expenses increased $443,000 from $5,081,000 in 2009 to $5,524,000 in 2010.
Development expenses consist primarily of internal payroll, payments to independent contractors and
related expenses for the development and maintenance of our Finale notation, SmartMusic and
SmartMusic Gradebook products as well as non-capitalized SmartMusic repertoire development,
business systems and quality assurance. Other development expenses are unallocated expenses not
directly attributable to a particular segment and include IT infrastructure and website support
costs.
Notation development expenses increased primarily due to increased quality assurance costs for
automated testing enhancements and consulting expenses relating to the engagement of an interactive
design and strategic consulting company that assessed future notation product direction.
SmartMusic development expenses increased primarily due to contractor labor used to support
the release of SmartMusic 2011, which included enhancements to SmartMusic Gradebook functionality,
as well as an increase of non-capitalized SmartMusic repertoire development. During the year ended
December 31, 2010, numerous method books and 176 new SmartMusic large ensemble band, jazz ensemble,
and orchestra titles with pre-authored assignments were released, compared to 759 new titles in the
year ended December 31, 2009. Net content development expenditures of $511,000 in 2010 and $570,000
in 2009 related to this additional SmartMusic repertoire have been capitalized and are being
amortized over their estimated useful life of 5 years.
Other development expenses declined as resources were assigned to SmartMusic to support the
enhancements to SmartMusic 2011 and Gradebook functionality.
22
Table of Contents
Selling and marketing expense ($ in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Incr (Decr) | % | |||||||||||||
Notation |
$ | 1,778 | $ | 1,816 | ($38 | ) | -2 | % | ||||||||
SmartMusic |
1,728 | 1,607 | 121 | 8 | % | |||||||||||
Other |
1,068 | 716 | 352 | 49 | % | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,574 | $ | 4,139 | $ | 435 | 11 | % | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses primarily consist of marketing, advertising and promotion
expenses, business development and customer service activities, and payroll. Selling and marketing
expenses increased from $4,139,000 in 2009 to $4,574,000 in 2010. This increase of $435,000, or
11%, is primarily due to an increase in SmartMusic expenses of $121,000 relating to personnel
increases in educational sales and an increase in Other selling and marketing expenses of $352,000
due to increased personnel relating to our company-wide strategic sales and marketing initiatives
and expanded focus on company-wide e-commerce efforts.
General and administrative expense ($ in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Incr (Decr) | % | |||||||||||||
Notation |
$ | 81 | $ | 77 | $ | 4 | 5 | % | ||||||||
SmartMusic |
71 | 70 | 1 | 1 | % | |||||||||||
Other |
3,589 | 3,589 | 0 | 0 | % | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,741 | $ | 3,736 | $ | 5 | 0 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and related expenses for
executive and administrative personnel, professional services, facility costs, bad debt, and other
general corporate expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by $5,000 from $3,736,000
in 2009 to $3,741,000 in 2010. General and administrative costs increased primarily as a result of
legal and professional fees relating to the engagement of a national investment banking firm to
pursue strategic alternatives and expenses relating to the departure of our former Chief Executive
Officer in the fourth quarter of 2010, offset by a decrease in consulting expenses and voluntary
disclosure sales tax payments.
Income from operations ($ in thousands)
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Incr (Decr) | % | |||||||||||||
Notation |
$ | 5,484 | $ | 6,329 | ($845 | ) | -13 | % | ||||||||
SmartMusic |
685 | 110 | 575 | 523 | % | |||||||||||
Other |
(5,693 | ) | (5,551 | ) | (142 | ) | 3 | % | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 476 | $ | 888 | ($412 | ) | -46 | % | ||||||||
Net income from operations decreased from $888,000 in 2009 to $476,000 in 2010. The decline in
operating performance was primarily due to the overall increase in operating expenses noted above,
when compared to the same period last year.
The notation segment net income decreased from $6,329,000 in 2009 to $5,484,000 in 2010 due
primarily to a decrease in revenue and increased development expenses. SmartMusic income from
operations improved
23
Table of Contents
$575,000 to $685,000 in 2010 due to increased SmartMusic revenue, which was partially offset
by increased operating expenses, related primarily to development.
Interest income and expense, net
Net interest income was $58,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $56,000 in
net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in net interest income was
due to a larger cash balance during the year.
Income tax
We recorded a net income tax benefit of $461,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010,
compared to an income tax benefit of $2,494,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009.
In evaluating our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, we consider all available
positive and negative evidence, including our past operating results in the most recent fiscal
years and our assessment of expected future profitability and the overall prospects for our
business. Based on all the available evidence, in the fourth quarter of 2009, we determined that it
had become more likely than not that we would realize a portion of our net deferred tax assets. As
a result, we reduced our valuation allowance by approximately $2,564,000. During 2010, we have
maintained our policy established in the fourth quarter of 2009 of recording a deferred tax asset
representing tax on three years of forecasted income. There continues to be enough uncertainty
around our ability to forecast beyond three years that this policy is prudent. The primary
uncertainties relate to technological changes beyond three years potentially impacting our notation
products. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009 we have a remaining valuation allowance of approximately
$5,690,000 against net deferred tax assets. In the event the valuation allowance on the net
operating losses expiring in 2023 is reversed we will need to recognize a reserve for uncertain tax
positions of $3,175,000. Significant management judgment is required to determine when, in the
future, the realization of our net deferred tax assets will become more likely than not. We will
continue to assess the realizability of the tax benefit available based on actual and forecasted
operating results.
Liquidity and capital resources
Cash flow from operating activities was $3,128,000 in the year ended December 31, 2010
compared to $3,233,000 in the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $105,000. Included in the
cash flow from operating activities are deferred income taxes of $2,564,000 in 2009 and $436,000 in
2010. The reduction in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to the reduction in
net income for fiscal 2010. Actual cash used in operations is typically highest in the first and
second quarter, with the third and fourth quarters normally producing positive operating cash flow.
These quarterly fluctuations are created by the notation product release cycle and the seasonality
impact of sales to schools related to the school year fiscal calendar. Management expects to
continue to achieve positive annual cash flow in the foreseeable future but not necessarily in each
quarter. If we do not meet our anticipated revenue levels due to economic conditions, a
significantly later-than-anticipated product release, or a decrease in demand for our products,
management is committed to expense reductions as necessary to ensure adequate cash levels.
Our primary liquidity and capital requirements have been for investment in product development
primarily relating to the additional titles and method books being added into SmartMusic. Cash used
in investing activities was $653,000 in the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $788,000 in
the year ended December 31, 2009. This $135,000 reduction was due to our decrease in property and
equipment purchases and repertoire development spending. Current year expenditures were $143,000
for purchases of property and equipment and $511,000 for capitalization of repertoire development.
We expect to incur higher levels of development spending in the future as our growth initiatives in
both the notation and SmartMusic segments.
Cash provided by financing activities was $114,000 in the year ended December 31, 2010,
compared to cash used of $94,000 in the year ended December 31, 2009. This change is primarily due
to stock option exercise activity. During 2010, $181,000 was received for the exercise of stock
options and warrants, versus $86,000 received in 2009.
24
Table of Contents
During 2010, one individual exercised stock options under a cashless exercise and, as a
result, cash proceeds of $6,000 from the redemption were used to pay taxes withheld. During 2009,
one individual exercised stock options under multiple cashless exercises and, as a result, cash
proceeds of $121,000 from the redemption were used to pay taxes withheld. We do not expect any
significant cash to be provided by the exercise of stock options or warrants in 2011 due to our
current stock price and options outstanding.
As of December 31, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $11,532,000 and as of December
31, 2009, the balance was $8,943,000.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
As of December 31, 2010, our contractual cash obligations consist of future minimum lease
payments due under non-cancelable capital and operating leases as follows:
Capital Lease | Operating Lease | Total Lease | ||||||||||
Obligations | Obligations | Obligations | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
2011 |
$ | 26 | $ | 48 | $ | 74 | ||||||
2012 |
5 | 0 | 5 | |||||||||
Thereafter |
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
$ | 31 | $ | 48 | $ | 79 | |||||||
We expect to continue to incur operating lease obligations generally comparable to our
existing lease payments following our anticipated lease renewal in March 2011. However, we have not
yet executed a binding agreement regarding such amounts.
From time to time we enter into purchase commitments with our suppliers under customary
purchase order terms. Any significant losses implicit in these contracts would be recognized in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. At December 31, 2010 no such losses
existed.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
None.
New accounting pronouncements. Refer to Note 3 in our financial statements.
25
Table of Contents
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
MakeMusic, Inc.
MakeMusic, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of MakeMusic, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and
2009, and the related statements of income, stockholders equity and cash flows for the years then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its
internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of MakeMusic, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 4, 2011
March 4, 2011
26
Table of Contents
MakeMusic, Inc.
Balance Sheets
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
Balance Sheets
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 11,532 | $ | 8,943 | ||||
Accounts receivable (net of allowance of $20 and $33 in
2010 and 2009, respectively) |
1,238 | 1,277 | ||||||
Inventories |
201 | 386 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
2,786 | 2,070 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
252 | 294 | ||||||
Total current assets |
16,009 | 12,970 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
342 | 533 | ||||||
Capitalized software products, net |
2,424 | 2,645 | ||||||
Goodwill |
3,630 | 3,630 | ||||||
Long term deferred income taxes, net |
214 | 494 | ||||||
Other non-current assets |
2 | 6 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 22,621 | $ | 20,278 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
$ | 25 | $ | 61 | ||||
Accounts payable |
489 | 726 | ||||||
Accrued compensation |
1,372 | 1,167 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
307 | 297 | ||||||
Post contract support |
150 | 132 | ||||||
Reserve for product returns |
380 | 414 | ||||||
Current portion of deferred revenue |
3,603 | 2,913 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
6,326 | 5,710 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
4 | 30 | ||||||
Deferred revenue, net of current portion |
96 | 0 | ||||||
Other long term liabilities |
0 | 8 | ||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value: |
||||||||
Authorized shares 10,000,000 |
||||||||
Issued and outstanding shares 4,895,983 and 4,756,891
in 2010 and 2009, respectively |
49 | 48 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
66,632 | 65,980 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(50,486 | ) | (51,498 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
16,195 | 14,530 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 22,621 | $ | 20,278 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
27
Table of Contents
MakeMusic, Inc.
Statements of Income
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
Statements of Income
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
Year | ||||||||
Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Notation revenue |
$ | 10,712 | $ | 11,060 | ||||
SmartMusic revenue |
6,436 | 5,382 | ||||||
NET REVENUE |
17,148 | 16,442 | ||||||
COST OF REVENUES |
2,833 | 2,598 | ||||||
GROSS PROFIT |
14,315 | 13,844 | ||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
||||||||
Development expenses |
5,524 | 5,081 | ||||||
Selling and marketing expenses |
4,574 | 4,139 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses |
3,741 | 3,736 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
13,839 | 12,956 | ||||||
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS |
476 | 888 | ||||||
Other, net |
75 | 71 | ||||||
Net income before income tax |
551 | 959 | ||||||
Income tax benefit |
(461 | ) | (2,494 | ) | ||||
Net Income |
$ | 1,012 | $ | 3,453 | ||||
Income per common share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 0.74 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 0.72 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
4,835,478 | 4,685,480 | ||||||
Diluted |
4,913,887 | 4,771,734 |
See accompanying notes.
28
Table of Contents
MakeMusic, Inc.
Statement of Shareholders Equity
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except shares)
Statement of Shareholders Equity
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except shares)
Additional | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-In | Accumulated | Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Equity | ||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
4,635,529 | $ | 46 | $ | 65,716 | $ | (54,951 | ) | $ | 10,811 | ||||||||||
Exercise of stock options and warrants |
37,800 | 1 | 85 | | 86 | |||||||||||||||
Redemption of stock, net of cashless option
exercise |
59,446 | 1 | (121 | ) | (120 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted shares, net of forfeiture |
24,116 | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Share based compensation |
| | 300 | | 300 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 3,453 | 3,453 | ||||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2009 |
4,756,891 | 48 | 65,980 | (51,498 | ) | 14,530 | ||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
76,179 | 1 | 180 | | 181 | |||||||||||||||
Redemption of stock, net of cashless option
exercise |
6,980 | | (18 | ) | | (18 | ) | |||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted shares |
55,933 | | 52 | | 52 | |||||||||||||||
Share based compensation |
| | 438 | | 438 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 1,012 | 1,012 | |||||||||||||||
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 |
4,895,983 | $ | 49 | $ | 66,632 | $ | (50,486 | ) | $ | 16,195 | ||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
29
Table of Contents
MakeMusic, Inc.
Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
Year | ||||||||
Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,012 | $ | 3,453 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,069 | 943 | ||||||
Gain on disposal of assets |
(1 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
(436 | ) | (2,564 | ) | ||||
Share based compensation |
438 | 300 | ||||||
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
39 | 121 | ||||||
Inventories |
185 | 79 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
42 | (1 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable |
(237 | ) | 353 | |||||
Accrued liabilities and product returns |
231 | (21 | ) | |||||
Deferred revenue |
786 | 577 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
3,128 | 3,233 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(143 | ) | (227 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
1 | 9 | ||||||
Capitalized development |
(511 | ) | (570 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(653 | ) | (788 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
181 | 86 | ||||||
Payments for redemption of stock |
(6 | ) | (121 | ) | ||||
Payments on capital leases |
(61 | ) | (59 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
114 | (94 | ) | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
2,589 | 2,351 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
8,943 | 6,592 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
$ | 11,532 | $ | 8,943 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 6 | $ | 10 | ||||
Income taxes paid |
136 | 5 | ||||||
Other non-cash investment and financing activities |
||||||||
Equipment acquired under capital lease |
0 | 18 |
See accompanying notes.
30
Table of Contents
Notes to Financial Statements
1. Description of Business
MakeMusic develops and markets proprietary music technology solutions under the
Finale® and SmartMusic® brands that enhance music learning and composition,
increase productivity and make practicing and performing music engaging. Our innovative products
provide easy-to-use, efficient alternatives to traditional practice, education, and composition
techniques. Software product sales are made through traditional distribution channels and
MakeMusics websites.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition
Notation revenue is primarily derived from the sale of perpetual license agreements to end
users and a dealer network for off the shelf products which are easily installed and used by the
customer. Post contract support revenue is recognized at the time of sale, the cost associated with
the support is accrued. SmartMusic subscription revenue is generated from the sale of term license
agreements with a subscription to our current repertoire of songs and access to all future titles
released during the subscription period. SmartMusic revenue is recognized over the lives of the
term license agreements. Software revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 985-605, Software
Software Revenue Recognition, (formerly AICPA SOP 97-2) when all of the following conditions are
met: there is evidence of an agreement with the customer (normally a purchase order), delivery has
occurred, the total sales price is fixed and determinable, collection is probable, and any
uncertainties with regard to customer acceptance are insignificant. We recognize revenue from the
sale of SmartMusic accessories based on the fair value of the individual components based on
standalone sales.
When a new version of Finale is released, dealers retain the right to return any unsold
versions of the prior release (normally 10% of total prior year sales) in exchange for an equal
number of units of the updated version of the product that is returned. The history of these
returns is tracked and revenue is deferred based on the expected return rate until the new product
is released, at which time the product may be returned for credit provided the customer places an
equivalent (number of units) order for the new version.
Shipping and handling charges are accounted for in accordance with ASC 605-45, Revenue
Recognition Principal Agent Considerations, (formerly EITF No. 00-10) with all charges to
customers for shipping and handling included in revenues and all costs in cost of revenues. Net
revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010, and 2009 includes $746,000 and $779,000 of shipping
and handling revenue, respectively. Cost of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
includes $444,000 and $439,000 of shipping expense, respectively.
We record revenue net of any sales tax, use tax and value added tax. Sales taxes collected
from our customers are included in accounts payable until remitted to the appropriate taxing
jurisdiction.
Net Income Per Common Share
For years ended December 31, 2010, and 2009 diluted net income per common share was computed
by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year,
including potentially dilutive shares such as options and warrants to purchase shares of common
stock at various amounts per share (Note 5). The dilutive effect of the additional shares for the
years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was to increase the weighted average common shares
outstanding by 78,409 and 86,254 respectively.
31
Table of Contents
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
At December 31, 2010, and 2009 the carrying values of financial instruments such as cash and
cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximated their market values based
on the short-term maturities of these instruments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of money market instruments with original maturities of 90 days or
less. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. Cash balances at
December 31, 2010 and 2009 exceed FDIC insurance limits. The Company has not experienced any losses
in such accounts.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are recorded for all credit sales at the time the products are shipped to
the customers. Credit terms for dealers and distributors are generally net 30 days and are granted
on the basis of credit references and payment history. Certain large volume dealers and
distributors are granted payment terms of greater than 30 days. Schools submit purchase orders for
shipments with payment due in 30 days. Sales to individuals are paid prior to shipment with a
credit card or prepayment with the order. Payments not received within the agreed-upon terms are
considered past due.
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based on bad debt history and
analysis of specific past due accounts. Analysis of the customers ability to pay includes contact
through statements, e-mail, and telephone as well as consideration of the customers payment
history. If the analysis indicates any customers are unlikely to pay, the accounts are written off
against the allowance for doubtful accounts, and if significant, sent to collections.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of weighted average cost or market, using the first-in
first-out (FIFO) method, and consist of finished products and components, net of a reserve for
obsolescence. An analysis of obsolescence reserves is conducted quarterly.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at their acquisition costs net of accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is computed by using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
purchased software (three years), computer equipment (three years), and furniture (five years).
Property and equipment held under capital leases are capitalized and depreciated over the
useful lives of the assets, in case of a contractual option to buy, or over the residual lives of
the lease contracts.
Capitalized Software Products
Capitalized software products consist of expenditures to develop software products for sale,
including repertoire software.
32
Table of Contents
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Product development
Costs incurred in the development of software products are capitalized in accordance with ASC
985-20, Software Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed, (formerly FAS 86). The
Company evaluates the unamortized capitalized costs compared to the estimated net realizable value
of the product to determine if the capitalized costs are recoverable. Costs incurred on notation
products relating to the annual development of upgrades are expensed as incurred.
Costs capitalized in accordance with ASC 985-20 for the development of SmartMusic Gradebook
application as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, net of amortization and reserves were $128,000 and
$230,000 respectively. The capitalized amount represents costs of developing the SmartMusic
Gradebook interface to the SmartMusic application as technological feasibility had been established
through the successful selling of the core SmartMusic application. The capitalized costs are being
amortized over a five-year period. The Company evaluates the unamortized capitalized costs compared
to the estimated net realizable value of the product to determine if the capitalized costs are
recoverable.
As of December 31, 2010, and 2009, costs capitalized for the development of repertoire
software, net of amortization and reserves, were $2,296,000 and $2,415,000, respectively. The
capitalized amount represents costs of producing product masters for new songs as technological
feasibility had been established by the inclusion of solo repertoire in earlier SmartMusic
versions. When a title is available for release, expenditures related to that title are no longer
capitalized and the capitalized cost of the title is amortized over a five-year period using the
straight-line method. The Company evaluates the unamortized capitalized costs compared to the
estimated net realizable value of the product to determine if the capitalized costs are
recoverable. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, amortization expense was $735,000 and
$449,000, respectively.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the cost in excess of fair value of the tangible and identified intangible
assets of businesses acquired. In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other,
(formerly SFAS 142) goodwill is not amortized but rather is reviewed for impairment annually in the
fourth quarter of MakeMusics fiscal year, or more often if indicators of impairment exist (see
Note 4).
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, excluding goodwill, are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If impairment
indicators are present and the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value
of the assets, the carrying value of the assets may require a reduction to their estimated fair
value as measured by discounted cash flows or appraised values.
33
Table of Contents
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized
for deductible temporary differences and operating loss or tax credit carry-forwards and deferred
tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the
differences between the amounts of assets and liabilities recorded for income tax and financial
reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when management
determines that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will
not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax
laws and tax rates on the date of enactment.
In the fourth quarter of 2009, we determined that it had become more likely than not that we
would realize a portion of our net deferred tax assets. As a result, based on the estimated tax on
three years of forecasted net income, we reversed approximately $2,564,000 of our valuation
allowance in fiscal year 2009 which was recorded as a one-time income tax benefit. As of December
31, 2010, we have a remaining valuation allowance of approximately $5,690,000 against net deferred
tax assets. The additional future potential decrease of the valuation allowance is dependent on our
future ability to realize the deferred tax assets that are affected by the future profitability of
MakeMusic.
The following table illustrates the change in our reserve for uncertain tax positions during
the year ended December 31, 2010. These amounts represent unrecorded tax net operating loss carry
forwards and therefore they are not reflected as a liability on our balance sheet ($ in thousands):
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
$ | 3,133 | ||
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year |
99 | |||
Net reductions for tax provisions of prior years |
(57 | ) | ||
Settlements |
| |||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | 3,175 | ||
In the event that we utilize the unrecorded tax net operating losses prior to its expiration
in 2023 we will need to recognize a reserve for uncertain tax positions of $3,175,000.
Interest and penalties related to any uncertain tax positions would be accounted for as a
long-term liability with the corresponding expense being charged to current period non-operating
expenses. As of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we have recognized no liability related to
interest and penalties. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would
affect our effective tax rate is zero based on the fact that we currently have a full reserve
against our unrecognized tax benefits.
As of December 31, 2010, there are no open positions for which the unrecognized tax benefits
will significantly increase or decrease during the next twelve months. Additionally, tax years
still open for examination by federal and state agencies as of December 31, 2010, are 2005 to 2010.
34
Table of Contents
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Stock-Based Compensation
A stock-based compensation plan is currently offered to MakeMusic employees, board members,
and consultants. This plan is administered by the compensation committee of the Board of Directors,
which recommends to the Board those persons eligible to receive awards and the number of shares
and/or options subject to each award, the terms, conditions, performance measures, and other
provisions of the award. Readers should refer to Note 5 for additional information related to our
stock-based compensation plans.
Compensation cost recognized in 2010 and 2009 includes compensation cost for all share-based
payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair
value estimated in accordance with the standards then in effect, and compensation cost for all
share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value
estimated.
Stock based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $438,000, plus an
additional $63,000 accrued until restricted shares are issued in 2011. Stock compensation for the
year ended December 31, 2009 was $300,000.
During 2010 and 2009 we used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value
of stock-based awards with the weighted average assumptions noted in the following table:
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.45 | % | 1.27 | % | ||||
Expected life, in years |
3.8 | 4.2 | ||||||
Expected volatility |
79.71 | % | 76.61 | % | ||||
Dividend yield |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % |
Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our share price for the period
prior to option grant equivalent to the expected life of the options. The expected term is based on
managements estimate of when the option will be exercised which is generally the midpoint between
the vesting period and the contractual life. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the
contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant.
Advertising and Promotion
Product costs for promotional samples are classified in the statement of income as sales and
marketing expense. Costs associated with the purchase of tradeshow booths and equipment are
included in capitalized property and equipment and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.
All other advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Sales and marketing expenses include
advertising expense of $872,000 and $905,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Use of Estimates
Preparation of the financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and related revenues and expenses. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassification
Certain amounts have been reclassified in the 2009 balance sheet to be consistent with the
2010 balance sheet presentation. This reclassification resulted in an increase in the current asset
for deferred income taxes of $483,000 and corresponding decrease in the long term asset for
deferred income taxes.
35
Table of Contents
3. New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to revenue recognition of
multiple element arrangements. The new guidance states that if vendor-specific objective evidence
or third party evidence for deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined, companies will be
required to develop a best estimate of the selling price to separate deliverables and allocate
arrangement consideration using the relative selling price method. The accounting guidance will be
applied prospectively and will become effective during the first quarter of 2011. We are currently
evaluating the impact of this accounting guidance, but do not expect adoption will have any impact
on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to certain revenue
arrangements that include software elements. Previously, companies that sold tangible products with
more than incidental software were required to apply software revenue recognition guidance. This
guidance often delayed revenue recognition for the delivery of the tangible product. Under the new
guidance, tangible products that have software components that are essential to the functionality
of the tangible product will be excluded from the software revenue recognition guidance. The new
guidance includes factors to help determine what is essential to the functionality.
Software-enabled products will not be subject to other revenue recognition guidance and will likely
follow the guidance for multiple deliverable arrangements issued by the FASB in September 2009,
noted above. We must apply the new guidance on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered
into or materially modified beginning January 1, 2011. We are currently evaluating the impact of
this accounting guidance, but do not expect adoption will have any impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
4. Supplemental Balance Sheet Information
Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Components
|
$ | 152 | $ | 317 | ||||
Finished goods
|
80 | 138 | ||||||
Reserve for obsolescence
|
(31 | ) | (69 | ) | ||||
$ | 201 | $ | 386 | |||||
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Computer equipment and software
|
$ | 2,453 | $ | 2,551 | ||||
Office furniture and other
|
483 | 482 | ||||||
2,936 | 3,033 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation
|
(2,594 | ) | (2,500 | ) | ||||
$ | 342 | $ | 533 | |||||
Depreciation expense for years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $334,000 and $383,000,
respectively.
36
Table of Contents
4. Supplemental Balance Sheet Information (Continued)
Certain equipment has been financed through capital lease contracts. Leased property and
equipment includes $222,000 of gross assets held as capital leases during 2010 and 2009 which had
accumulated depreciation of $204,000 and $138,000 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Capitalized Software Products
Capitalized software products are as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Repertoire development
|
$ | 4,491 | $ | 4,032 | ||||
Software translation
|
125 | 125 | ||||||
SmartMusic website
|
461 | 461 | ||||||
SmartMusic Gradebook development
|
511 | 511 | ||||||
5,588 | 5,129 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(3,164 | ) | (2,484 | ) | ||||
$ | 2,424 | $ | 2,645 | |||||
Amortization expense related to the capitalized software was $735,000 and $556,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2010, and 2009, respectively. Of the $2,424,000 in capitalized software as
of December 31, 2010, $423,000 is for repertoire development in progress that has not yet been
released into a current product. Of the $2,645,000 in capitalized software as of December 31, 2009,
$566,000 is for repertoire development in progress that had not been released. When the content
that is currently in development is released into current product, these additional amounts will
also be amortized over five years on a straight-line basis. The estimated future amortization
expense for existing capitalized software is as follows:
(In thousands) | ||||
2011
|
$ | 818 | ||
2012
|
699 | |||
2013
|
501 | |||
2014
|
268 | |||
2015
|
138 | |||
$ | 2,424 | |||
Goodwill
Goodwill of $3,630,000 resulted from a reverse merger in 2000. MakeMusic has two reporting
units and assigned all goodwill to the Notation reporting unit. On an annual basis, or
more often if indicators of impairment exist, we evaluate goodwill to determine whether any
impairment may have occurred. Our impairment analyses for years ended December 31, 2010, and 2009
indicated no impairment had occurred.
37
Table of Contents
4. Supplemental Balance Sheet Information (Continued)
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue is primarily composed of the unearned portion of SmartMusic subscriptions
lasting more than one month, deferrals of Finale notation revenue for free upgrades granted to
customers purchasing Finale immediately prior to release of a new version, and other deferred
revenue and deposits, as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Deferred SmartMusic subscription revenue, current
|
$ | 3,537 | $ | 2,834 | ||||
Deferred notation revenue
|
28 | 42 | ||||||
Deposits
|
38 | 37 | ||||||
Current Deferred Revenue
|
3,603 | 2,913 | ||||||
Deferred SmartMusic subscription revenue, long-term
|
96 | 0 | ||||||
$ | 3,699 | $ | 2,913 | |||||
Other Accrued Liabilities
Other accrued liabilities are composed of accrued royalties and other miscellaneous accrued
expenses as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Accrued royalties
|
$ | 119 | $ | 82 | ||||
Other
|
188 | 223 | ||||||
$ | 307 | $ | 305 | |||||
5. Shareholders Equity
Stock Options and Warrants
MakeMusic has a Stock Option Plan (the 2003 Plan) pursuant to which options for up to
1,500,000 shares of its common stock may be issued to its key employees and directors. Under the
2003 Plan, the options generally may not exceed 10 years and are granted at prices that must be
equal to or more than the stocks fair market value at the grant date. There were 504,536 options
outstanding under the 2003 plan as of December 31, 2010.
38
Table of Contents
5. Shareholders Equity (Continued)
The following table represents stock option and restricted stock activity for the year ended
December 31, 2010:
Weighted Average | Weighted Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Shares Reserved | 2003 Plan | Option Exercise | Remaining Contract | |||||||||||||||||
for Future Grant | Restricted Shares | Plan Option Shares | Price | Life | ||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2009 |
586,047 | 24,116 | 445,755 | $ | 5.09 | |||||||||||||||
Authorized |
| | | |||||||||||||||||
Granted |
(309,433 | ) | 55,933 | 253,500 | $ | 4.79 | ||||||||||||||
Expired |
1,250 | | (1,250 | ) | $ | 2.35 | ||||||||||||||
Cancelled |
83,239 | | (83,239 | ) | $ | 4.72 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
| | (110,230 | ) | $ | 2.77 | ||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2010 |
361,103 | 80,049 | 504,536 | $ | 5.51 | 3.7 Years | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding
Exercisable Options
at December 31,
2010 |
259,201 | $ | 6.2 | 1.8 Years | ||||||||||||||||
The weighted-average fair value of options granted during 2010 and 2009 (computed using
the Black-Scholes method) was $2.67 and $2.05, respectively.
The following summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2010:
Options Outstanding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise Prices | Weighted Remaining | Options Exercisable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Life | Weighted Exercise | Weighted Exercise | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From | to | Number Outstanding | (in Years) | Price | Number Outstanding | Price | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$0.00 |
to | $ | 3.50 | 60,392 | 4.24 | $ | 3.21 | 27,750 | $ | 2.92 | ||||||||||||||||||
$3.51 |
to | $ | 6.00 | 329,313 | 3.88 | $ | 5.12 | 129,995 | $ | 5.64 | ||||||||||||||||||
$6.01 |
to | $ | 10.00 | 84,833 | 2.68 | $ | 6.96 | 76,458 | $ | 7.02 | ||||||||||||||||||
$10.01 |
to | $ | 11.00 | 29,998 | 3.37 | $ | 10.21 | 24,998 | $ | 10.22 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | 504,536 | 3.69 | $ | 5.51 | 259,201 | $ | 6.20 | |||||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2010, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding was $248,000
and the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable was $88,000. Total intrinsic value of
options exercised during 2010 was $289,000. At December 31, 2010, there was $316,000 of
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based payments which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years. At December 31, 2010, there was $39,000 of
unrecognized compensation cost related to the issuance of restricted stock which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
There were no new warrants issued during 2010 or 2009. Total warrants of 15,000 at an exercise
price of $6.60 were outstanding at December 31, 2010, all of which are exercisable. There were
15,083 warrants that expired during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and no warrants that
expired during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. The 15,000 remaining warrants will expire
in 2011.
39
Table of Contents
6. Commitments
Capital Lease Obligations
Future minimum lease payments under capital lease obligations due for the years ending
December 31 are as follows (in thousands):
2011 |
$ | 26 | ||
2012 |
5 | |||
Total minimum lease payments |
31 | |||
Less amount representing interest |
(2 | ) | ||
Present value of net minimum lease payments |
29 | |||
Less current portion |
(25 | ) | ||
Long-term portion |
$ | 4 | ||
Operating Leases
The Company leases office and warehouse space and certain equipment under operating leases.
Total future minimum lease payments, excluding common area charges, under these leases as of
December 31, 2010, are as follows (in thousands):
2011 |
$ | 48 | ||
Total |
$ | 48 | ||
Rent expense, including common area maintenance expense for the years ended December 31, 2010,
and 2009 was $247,000 and $251,000, respectively.
7. 401(k) Savings Plan
The Company has a 401(k) savings plan for the benefit of qualified employees. Under the plan,
qualified employees may elect to defer up to 80% of their compensation, subject to a limit
determined by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company, at the discretion of the Board of
Directors, may elect to make additional discretionary contributions. The Company made no
contributions to the plan in 2010 or 2009.
40
Table of Contents
8. Income Taxes
The tax effects of temporary differences for 2010 and 2009 at assumed effective annual rates
of 37.4% and 37.8%, respectively (combined federal rate and state tax rate) for both years are
shown in the following table:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Loss carry-forwards |
$ | 5,747 | $ | 6,474 | ||||
Research and development credits |
1,164 | 1,069 | ||||||
Alternative minimum tax credit |
36 | 0 | ||||||
Minnesota research and development credits |
490 | 0 | ||||||
Inventory |
16 | 26 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
131 | 114 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
1,370 | 1,087 | ||||||
Software development and prepaid royalties |
69 | 55 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
586 | 420 | ||||||
Accounts receivable |
7 | 13 | ||||||
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets |
(5,690 | ) | (5,690 | ) | ||||
Deferred tax assets |
$ | 3,926 | $ | 3,568 | ||||
Deferred tax liability: |
||||||||
Software development costs |
926 | 1,004 | ||||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | 3,000 | $ | 2,564 | ||||
The components giving rise to the net deferred income tax assets described above have been
included in the accompanying balance sheets as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Current assets |
$ | 2,786 | $ | 2,070 | ||||
Long-term assets |
214 | 494 | ||||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | 3,000 | $ | 2,564 | ||||
The components of income tax benefit are as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Current tax expense (benefit) |
$ | (25 | ) | $ | 70 | |||
Deferred tax benefit |
(436 | ) | (2,564 | ) | ||||
Total tax benefit |
($461 | ) | ($2,494 | ) | ||||
41
Table of Contents
8. Income Taxes (continued)
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of sufficient future
taxable income. Management has determined that sufficient uncertainty exists regarding
realizability of the net deferred tax assets and has provided a valuation allowance of $5,690,000
in 2010 and 2009.
A reconciliation of the income tax expense computed using the U.S. statutory rate (34%) to the
effective income tax expense (benefit) included in the statements of income is as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Income tax expense computed at the statutory rate |
$ | 187 | $ | 326 | ||||
State tax expense, net of calculated federal income tax effects |
19 | 37 | ||||||
R&D Credits |
(140 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||
Change in Valuation Allowance |
(621 | ) | (2,922 | ) | ||||
Permanent differences |
77 | 80 | ||||||
Other |
17 | (5 | ) | |||||
Income tax benefit |
$ | (461 | ) | $ | (2,494 | ) | ||
Net Operating Losses
At December 31, 2010, we had federal net operating loss carry-forwards (NOLs) and research and
development credit carry-forwards which may be used to offset otherwise future taxable income with
the following expiration dates:
Federal | Research and | |||||||
Net Operating Loss | Development Credits | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
2011 |
$ | 910 | $ | 43 | ||||
2012 |
1,736 | 38 | ||||||
2018 |
770 | 46 | ||||||
2019 |
491 | 36 | ||||||
2020 |
| | ||||||
2021 |
1,474 | 72 | ||||||
2022 |
1,275 | 116 | ||||||
2023 |
9,115 | 72 | ||||||
2024 |
| 91 | ||||||
2025 |
| 68 | ||||||
2026 |
| 72 | ||||||
2027 |
| 168 | ||||||
2028 |
| 101 | ||||||
2029 |
| 100 | ||||||
2030 |
| 141 | ||||||
$ | 15,771 | $ | 1,164 | |||||
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code restricts the annual utilization of NOLs incurred
prior to a change in ownership. Such a change in ownership occurred in connection with the Coda
reverse merger, thereby potentially restricting the NOLs available. In 2009 we completed a further
Section 382 analysis for the time period since the reverse merger and determined that there are
limitations relating to ownership changes. The acquisition of additional shares by a greater than
5% shareholder in January 2007 resulted in an ownership change under Section 382 over a three
year period resulting in potential future limitations on the utilization of our NOLs.
42
Table of Contents
9. Litigation
On September 14, 2010, a complaint was filed against us by Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc
Singapore Private Limited (collectively Uniloc) in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas. The complaint alleges infringement of Unilocs patent for securely
registering software and other digital media to prevent illicit copying and software piracy and
seeks a permanent injunction. In addition, Uniloc is seeking compensatory damages in an unspecified
amount, and interest, costs and expenses associated with the litigation. We are one of
approximately 60 companies that have been similarly sued by Uniloc. Further, the United States
Patent and Trademark Office recently issued an initial rejection for all of the claims of the
Uniloc patent at issue in the litigation. Management believes that the claims involved in the suit
are without merit and does not expect the litigation to have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, or results of operations. We will, however, incur costs and
diversion of management resources in defending the infringement claim. Moreover, because litigation
is inherently uncertain, we cannot guarantee that the outcome of this litigation will be favorable
to us or that material damages will not be awarded against us.
In the ordinary course of business, we may be party to additional legal actions, proceedings,
or claims. Corresponding costs are accrued when it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the
amount can be precisely or reasonably estimated. Other than the litigation described above, we are
currently not aware of any threatened or actual litigation that would have a material effect on its
financial condition or results of operations.
10. Segment and Geographic Data
MakeMusic reports results of operations by two unique reportable segments, Notation and
SmartMusic.
The Notation segment includes the design, development, and sales and marketing for the Finale
family of music notation software products.
The SmartMusic segment includes the design, development, amortization of capitalized song
title development, and sales and marketing of the subscription-based SmartMusic product line, and
related accessories.
The costs included in each of the reportable segments operating results include the direct
costs of the products sold to customers and operating expenses managed by each of the reportable
segments.
The remaining activities are included in Other. These are unallocated expenses which include
costs related to selling and corporate functions, including general and administrative and business
systems functions that are not directly attributable to a particular segment. Unallocated expenses
are reported in the reconciliation of the segment totals to consolidated totals as Other items.
As a result, reportable segment results of operations are not representative of the operating
profit of the products in these reportable segments.
43
Table of Contents
10. Segment and Geographic Data (Continued)
MakeMusic does not allocate its balance sheet assets by segment because such information is
not available nor is it used by the chief operating decision maker. Therefore, information relating
to segment assets is not presented. The following table presents results of operations by
reportable segment (in thousands):
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notation | SmartMusic | Other | Total | Notation | SmartMusic | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET REVENUE |
$ | 10,712 | $ | 6,436 | $ | 0 | $ | 17,148 | $ | 11,060 | $ | 5,382 | $ | 0 | $ | 16,442 | |||||||||||||||||||
COST OF REVENUES |
838 | 1,995 | 0 | 2,833 | 940 | 1,658 | 0 | 2,598 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GROSS PROFIT |
9,874 | 4,441 | 0 | 14,315 | 10,120 | 3,724 | 0 | 13,844 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of Net Revenue |
92 | % | 69 | % | 0 | % | 83 | % | 92 | % | 69 | % | 0 | % | 84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development expenses |
2,531 | 1,957 | 1,036 | 5,524 | 1,898 | 1,937 | 1,246 | 5,081 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing
expenses |
1,778 | 1,728 | 1,068 | 4,574 | 1,816 | 1,607 | 716 | 4,139 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and
administrative expenses |
81 | 71 | 3,589 | 3,741 | 77 | 70 | 3,589 | 3,736 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses |
4,390 | 3,756 | 5,693 | 13,839 | 3,791 | 3,614 | 5,551 | 12,956 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income/(Loss) from
Operations |
5,484 | 685 | (5,693 | ) | 476 | 6,329 | 110 | (5,551 | ) | 888 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Expense |
0 | 0 | 536 | 536 | 0 | 0 | 2,565 | 2,565 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET INCOME/(LOSS) |
$ | 5,484 | $ | 685 | ($5,157 | ) | $ | 1,012 | $ | 6,329 | $ | 110 | ($2,986) | $3,453 | |||||||||||||||||||||
All of our long-lived assets are located in North America. The geographic distribution of
our revenues is summarized in the following table:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Net sales: |
||||||||
North America |
$ | 14,525 | $ | 13,921 | ||||
Europe |
1,220 | 1,314 | ||||||
Japan |
890 | 716 | ||||||
Other foreign countries |
513 | 491 | ||||||
$ | 17,148 | $ | 16,442 | |||||
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
44
Table of Contents
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and
reported within the timelines specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and
forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures,
management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated,
can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and in reaching
a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of
the end of the period covering this report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to
provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that are
filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within
the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and that our
disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our
management including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)).
Internal control over financial reporting refers to the process designed by, or under the
supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and effected by our Board
of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies
and procedures that:
(1) Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
(2) Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with
authorization of our management and directors; and
(3) Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting cannot provide
absolute assurance of preventing and detecting misstatements on a timely basis. Internal control
over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject
to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial
reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. In addition,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that
controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with
policies or procedures may deteriorate. However, these inherent limitations are known features of
the financial reporting process. It is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce,
though not eliminate, the risk that misstatements are not prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting for the Company.
Management has used the framework set forth in the report entitled Internal Control-Integrated
Framework published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, known
as COSO, to
45
Table of Contents
evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on
this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, our internal control over
financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation and presentation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not
subject to attestation by the Companys independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to
Section 989G of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which exempts
smaller reporting companies from the auditor attestation requirement.
Changes in Internal Controls
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
All information required to be reported in a report on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of
the year covered by this report has been reported.
46
Table of Contents
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table lists our executive officers and directors and their respective ages and
positions as of the date of this report:
Name | Age | Position | ||||
Robert B. Morrison
|
49 | Chairman of the Board | ||||
Trevor A. DSouza
|
45 | Director | ||||
Keith A. Fenhaus (1)
|
53 | Director | ||||
Jeffrey A. Koch
|
46 | Interim Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Graham Richmond
|
38 | Director | ||||
Michael Skinner
|
60 | Director | ||||
Karen L. VanDerBosch
|
47 | Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer |
(1) | The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Fenhaus qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under the applicable federal securities laws. |
Current committee membership is as follows;
Audit Committee | Compensation Committee | Governance Committee | ||
Keith A. Fenhaus, Chair
|
Michael Skinner, Chair | Graham Richmond, Chair | ||
Trevor A. DSouza
|
Keith A. Fenhaus | Robert B. Morrison | ||
Graham Richmond
|
Robert B. Morrison | Trevor A. DSouza |
Jeffrey A. Koch joined MakeMusic as a director on July 20, 2006, was elected the Chairman of
the Board on October 19, 2006, and was appointed to serve as interim Chief Executive Officer on
November 10, 2010. Mr. Koch was employed as a corporate bond trader with Agency Trading Group, Inc.
from August 2009 to November 2010. From 2005 to 2009, Mr. Koch was the Chief Executive Officer of
LaunchEquity Partners, LLC, a firm that specializes in investing in early stage companies with high
growth potential in both the public and private markets. Prior to founding LaunchEquity Partners,
Mr. Koch was the co-head of the High Yield Bond business at Metropolitan West Asset Management from
2003 to 2004. From 1989 to 2002, Mr. Koch held the position of Portfolio Manager of various fixed
income portfolios for Strong Capital Management, the most recent being the head of the High Yield
Bond business from 1996 to 2002. Mr. Koch received a B.S. from the University of Minnesota, Morris
in 1987 and an MBA from the John M. Olin School of Business at Washington University in St. Louis
in 1989. Mr. Koch is a Chartered Financial Analyst.
Trevor DSouza joined the Board March 2, 2010, in connection with an agreement dated March 2,
2010 among MakeMusic, LaunchEquity Partners, LLC and LaunchEquity Acquisition Partners, LLC
Designated Series Education Partners, relating to MakeMusics Board composition and certain other
matters (the LaunchEquity Agreement). Mr. DSouza serves as a member of the Audit Committee and
Governance Committee. Mr. DSouza is a managing director of Great Lakes Ventures, LLC. In addition,
since 2000, Mr. DSouza has served as Managing Director of Mason Wells, where he is responsible for
managing the venture investment activities of the firm. Through his role with Mason Wells, Mr.
DSouza has served as a director of a number of companies, including: Teramedica, Inc. (chairman,
2001-present), Zystor Therapeutics, Inc. (2004-2010), Deltanoid Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(2001-present), OpGen, Inc. (2002-2009), NameProtect, Inc. (chairman, 2001-2007), Mezzia, Inc.
(2001-2006), and Dedicated Computing (2007-2009). Prior to joining Mason Wells, Mr. DSouza served
as the President and CEO of Pharmasoft North America, Inc. from 1997 to 1999, and as a Program
Manager for Booz-Allen & Hamilton from 1994 to 1997. Mr. DSouza earned a Masters Degree in
Business Administration from George Washington
University, and a Bachelor of Science in Engineering from the Catholic University of America.
Among other
47
Table of Contents
attributes, skills, experiences and qualifications, the Board believes that it is
beneficial for Mr. DSouza to serve as a director of MakeMusic because he has significant board
experience, particularly with respect to companies that are similar in size to MakeMusic, as well
as valuable business and management expertise. The Board believes these experiences will allow Mr.
DSouza to understand issues that face MakeMusic, and to contribute to oversight of compliance with
SEC and accounting rules.
Keith A. Fenhaus was elected as a director on March 15, 2007. Mr. Fenhaus has served as the
Audit Committee Chairman since the date of his appointment and has served as a member of the
Compensation Committee since November 2010. In 2010, Mr. Fenhaus was promoted to President of
Hallmark Business Connections which includes all the business-to-business entities of Hallmark
Cards, Inc. Prior to 2010, Mr. Fenhaus was President of Hallmark Insights, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Hallmark Cards, specializing in business incentive solutions. Mr. Fenhaus has
previously served Hallmark Insights, where he has been employed since 1992, as Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Hallmark Insights, Mr. Fenhaus was the
Chief Financial Officer of Sheffert & Wein. His previous positions included Senior Vice President,
Finance, Community Financial Services at First Bank (now US Bank), and Vice President and
Controller at Norwest Mortgage (now Wells Fargo Home Mortgage). Mr. Fenhaus has a bachelor of
business administration degree from the University of Wisconsin. Among other attributes, skills,
experiences and qualifications, the Board believes that it is beneficial for Mr. Fenhaus to serve
as a director of MakeMusic because his business leadership experience allows him to understand the
challenges and requirements applicable to a public company, particularly companies that are to
MakeMusic in size and structure, and his education and financial industry experience give him an
ability to understand generally accepted accounting principles and internal control procedures and
analyze and evaluate financial statements.
Robert B. Morrison was appointed to the Board of Directors on July 9, 2007 and became Chairman
of the Board on November 10, 2010. Mr. Morrison serves on the Compensation Committee and Governance
Committee. Mr. Morrison is co-founder of Quadrant Arts Education Research, one of the nations
leading research and market intelligence organizations focusing on music and arts education.
Quadrant serves both the commercial and governmental sectors and has pioneered ground breaking
research on the status and condition of arts education in the United States. Prior to founding
Quadrant, Mr. Morrison was the founder and chairman emeritus of Music for All (MFA), a
not-for-profit educational organization whose mission is expand access to music and arts education.
Mr. Morrison also served as the Chief Executive Officer of the VH1 Save the Music Foundation, the
national non-profit organization committed to restoring music education in Americas public
schools. Mr. Morrison has also served as director of market development for NAMM, the international
music products association, was an executive director of the American Music Conference (AMC), where
he directed AMCs media efforts, and was a senior executive with the Pearl Corporation. Mr.
Morrison has received an honorary doctorate degree from the State University of New York, the Mr.
Hollands Opus Award from the National Academy of Recording Arts and Science and the Life
Achievement Award from the Music Distributors Association. Mr. Morrison has earned both an Emmy and
Peabody Award for his work on behalf of music education. Mr. Morrison served as a member of the
board of trustees for the Berklee College of Music in Boston and currently serves on several
national music and arts education policy boards. Among other attributes, skills, experiences and
qualifications, the Board believes that it is beneficial for Mr. Morrison to serve as a director of
MakeMusic because his industry experience allows him to understand MakeMusics challenges,
strategies and potential opportunities. He shares MakeMusics commitment to music education, and
his extensive connections in the education market segments and music products industry all
contribute to Mr. Morrisons ability to help challenge and guide MakeMusics long-term strategies.
Graham Richmond was elected to the Board of Directors on July 25, 2006. Mr. Richmond is
Chairman of the Governance Committee and is currently a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Richmond
is the Chief Executive Officer and co-founder of Clear Admit, LLC, an educational counseling
company focused on management education. Prior to launching Clear Admit at the end of 2001, Mr.
Richmond worked as an admissions counselor and technology consultant for the Wharton School at the
University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Richmonds career also includes a position as Vice President of
Marketing and Operations at MCS Multi-App, an educational technology company that served the
leading law and business schools with software applications in the 1990s. Beyond his professional
career, Mr. Richmond has pursued his passion for music as a classical and jazz flautist and
singer/songwriter/guitarist. He holds an undergraduate degree in art history from Swarthmore
College and an MBA in entrepreneurial management from the Wharton School at the University of
Pennsylvania. Among other attributes, skills, experiences and qualifications,
the Board believes that it is beneficial for Mr. Richmond to serve as a director of MakeMusic
because his business
48
Table of Contents
leadership experience and education allow him to understand MakeMusics
challenges and strategies, and his knowledge of e-commerce marketing strategies complement
MakeMusics strategy and products.
Michael Skinner was appointed to the Board of Directors on November 20, 2006, and is Chairman
of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Skinner is a summa cum laude graduate of Berklee College of
Music with a bachelors degree in music education. He received his masters degree in music
composition from the University of Miami. Mr. Skinner has worked as a composer, arranger,
clinician, and performer, as well as a music educator, having taught elementary through high school
music. In 1986, Mr. Skinner became the national clinician for Vandoren and a Yamaha performing
artist. He later became marketing manager for J. DAddario & Co., marketing Vandoren products as
well as J. DAddario education products. From 1991-2001, Mr. Skinner served as the marketing
manager for education products for the Band & Orchestral Division, Yamaha Corporation of America.
During his tenure at Yamaha Mr. Skinner managed the technology driven education system called Music
In Education , a software and hardware based keyboard system integrating curriculum and assessment
into a keyboard lab. In July of 2001, he returned to J. DAddario & Co. as Director of Marketing
for Band & Orchestra products. In July 2004, Mr. Skinner formed DANSR and became the sole U.S.
importer of Vandoren Products. Today, he remains the President of DANSR. In January 2011, Mr.
Skinner was appointed to the board of NAMM, a trade association for the global music products
industry. Among other attributes, skills, experiences and qualifications, the Board believes that
it is beneficial for Mr. Skinner to serve as a director of MakeMusic because his extensive
experience in marketing to music educators and music product retailers allow him to understand
MakeMusics opportunities and challenges and make strategic contributions.
Karen L. VanDerBosch joined MakeMusic as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in December
2006. On November 10, 2010, Ms. VanDerBosch was also appointed Chief Operating Officer. Ms.
VanDerBosch was most recently the CFO of Sagebrush Corporation, a privately held developer of
library automation software, and services, analytical software and book re-binder for the K-12
education market. Ms. VanDerBosch previously served as CFO for KB Gear Interactive, a privately
held developer and marketer of interactive digital devices and applications serving retail markets.
Her extensive background in manufacturing and technology industries also included CFO positions at
EMPAK Inc. and the publicly traded Fieldworks Inc. Ms. VanDerBosch holds a bachelor of science
degree in accounting from the University of Minnesota.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) requires our
executive officers, directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our Common Stock, to file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in
ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of MakeMusic. Officers, directors, and
greater than 10% shareholders (Insiders) are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with
copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To our knowledge, based on a review of the copies of
such reports furnished to MakeMusic, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 all Section
16(a) filing requirements applicable to Insiders were complied with the exception of the following:
Jeff Koch filed a late Form 4 on January 11, 2011 for options granted November 10, 2011 and Karen
VanDerBosch filed a late Form 4 on January 13, 2011 for options granted November 30, 2010.
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
The Board has a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (Code of Ethics) that applies to all of
our employees, directors, and officers, including our principal executive officer, principal
financial officer, and controller. The Code of Ethics addresses such topics as protection and
proper use of our assets, compliance with applicable laws and regulations, accuracy and
preservation of records, accounting and financial reporting, conflicts of interest, and insider
trading. The Code of Ethics is available in print, free of charge to any stockholder who sends a
request for a paper copy to MakeMusic, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 7615 Golden Triangle Drive,
Suite M, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344-3848. MakeMusic intends to include on its website any
amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of its Code of Ethics that applies to our principal
executive officers, principal financial officer, and controller that relates to any element of the
code of ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K.
49
Table of Contents
Audit Committee
The current members of our Audit Committee are Mr. Fenhaus (Chair), Mr. DSouza and Mr.
Richmond. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Fenhaus qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert, as defined by applicable rules of the SEC. The Board has further determined that
all members of the Audit Committee are independent within the meaning of the applicable listing
standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Overview
The Compensation Committee views executive compensation as a total package that includes base
salary, annual performance-based non-equity incentive plan awards, and long-term equity
compensation in the form of stock options and restricted stock awards. MakeMusic does not currently
provide a defined benefit pension plan, 401K match, or retiree health care.
Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Agreements
On November 10, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Jeffrey Koch upon
hiring him to serve as interim Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company
granted Mr. Koch a five-year stock option to purchase 50,000 shares of the Companys common stock.
In addition, Mr. Kochs employment agreement provided for an annualized base salary of $222,480 for
2010, which increased to $229,154 as of January 1, 2011. Mr. Kochs employment agreement also
provides that he is eligible for non-equity incentive compensation as determined by the Board of
Directors or a committee. For 2010, Mr. Koch was eligible to receive, on a pro-rated basis for the
portion of the year during which he served as interim Chief Executive Officer, a cash incentive
award equal to 80% of his base salary and to receive a restricted stock incentive award equal to
80% of his salary, with actual compensation dependent upon achievement during 2010 of company
financial objectives set by the Compensation Committee for the fiscal year. Mr. Koch is also
eligible to receive certain other benefits that we make available to executive officers, including
medical and dental insurance, retirement plans, life insurance and disability plans. Mr. Kochs
employment agreement has an indefinite term and is effective until Mr. Kochs employment is
terminated pursuant to the agreement. The agreement may be terminated by mutual agreement of the
parties, by the Company with or without cause, or by Mr. Koch. If the Company terminates Mr. Koch
without cause prior to November 9, 2011, he would be entitled to receive monthly cash payments
equal to his then-current base salary through that date.
On May 8, 2009 the Company entered into an employment agreement with former Chief Executive
Officer Ron Raup. For 2010, Mr. Raups annualized base salary was $222,480 and he was eligible to
receive cash incentive compensation equal to 80% of his base salary and to receive a restricted
stock incentive award equal to 80% of his base salary, with actual compensation dependent upon
achievement during 2010 of company financial objectives determined by the Compensation Committee.
On November 10, 2010, the Board of Directors accepted the resignation of Mr. Raup from his position
as Chief Executive Officer, which terminated Mr. Raups employment agreement. In connection with
his resignation, the Company entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Raup,
pursuant to which he has or will receive separation payments in the aggregate amount of
approximately $222,480 (his base salary in effect at the time of his resignation) and pro-rated
cash and equity incentive awards. Mr. Raups stock options will remain exercisable to the extent
permitted by the stock option agreements governing the awards. Mr. Raup was also entitled to
receive payment for accrued paid time off.
On May 8, 2009, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Karen VanDerBosch,
pursuant to which Ms. VanDerBosch was paid an annual base salary of $190,550 in 2010. In addition,
Ms. VanDerBoschs employment agreement provides that she may be eligible for non-equity incentive
compensation as determined by the Board of Directors or a committee. For 2010, Ms. VanDerBosch was
eligible to receive a cash incentive award equal to 60% of her base salary and to receive a
restricted stock incentive award equal to 60% of her salary, with actual compensation dependent
upon achievement during 2010 of company financial objectives that are set by the Compensation
Committee for the fiscal year. Ms. VanDerBosch is also eligible to receive certain other benefits
that we make available to executive officers, including medical and dental insurance, retirement
plans, life insurance and
50
Table of Contents
disability plans. Ms. VanDerBoschs employment agreement has an
indefinite term and is effective until Ms. VanDerBoschs employment is terminated pursuant to the
agreement. The agreement may be terminated by mutual agreement of the parties, by the Company with
or without cause, or by Ms. VanDerBosch. If we terminate Ms. VanDerBosch without cause, she would
be entitled to receive monthly cash payments equal to her then-current base salary for one year and
a pro-rated portion of any incentive compensation earned through the date of termination.
Base Salaries
In determining appropriate base salaries for executives in fiscal 2010, in addition to
reviewing market data, the Compensation Committee considered:
| the Chief Executive Officers recommendation as to compensation for all other executive officers; | ||
| the scope of responsibility, experience, time in position, and individual performance of each officer, including the Chief Executive Officers; | ||
| the effectiveness of each executives leadership performance and potential to enhance stockholders value; and | ||
| internal equity. |
The Compensation Committees analysis is a subjective process that utilizes no specific
weighting or formula of the factors above in determining executives base salaries.
Adjustments to base salaries are determined based on merit and market. This requires an
evaluation of individual performance, competitive market levels and rates of increase, executive
experience and internal equity, as well as our overall salary budget. Since annual
performance-based incentives (as discussed below) are based on a percentage of base salary, base
salary increases also have the effect of increasing the size of annual incentive opportunity.
Executive Incentive Compensation
In order to provide motivation to our Named Executive Officers (as defined below) and other
key employees, we award performance-based compensation upon their achievement of goals that the
Compensation Committee identifies on an annual basis. On March 2, 2009, the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors adopted an Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (the Executive Plan).
The Compensation Committee subsequently approved revisions to the Executive Plan on May 5, 2009.
The Executive Plan was used to provide incentive compensation to our Named Executive Officers and
other key employees in 2010 and is intended to be available for use in 2011 and future years. The
Executive Plan is applicable to our Named Executive Officers and certain other key employees, as
designated by the Compensation Committee. Participants have the potential to earn cash and
restricted stock. In addition, the Compensation Committee may grant options to participants or
other employees if certain performance levels are achieved. All equity awards made pursuant to the
Executive Plan are be governed by our 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, or any amended version thereof.
The amount of cash and the number of options and shares of restricted stock awarded to our
Named Executive Officers in each of 2010 and 2009 was based on our achievement of Management Bonus
Objectives
(MBOs). When selecting the MBOs, the Compensation Committee considers our business plan, the
individual skills and potential of the participants, targeted total compensation amounts based on
publicly available market data, and recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer.
For 2010 and 2009, the MBOs under the Executive Plan were based on achievement of quantifiable
financial performance in accordance with the annual business plan and included free cash flow,
operating margins, asset turns, Notation revenue, SmartMusic revenue and SmartMusic subscriptions.
In fiscal 2010, the Chief Executive Officer and interim Chief Executive Officer were each eligible
to earn a maximum of $177,984 cash and $177,894 worth of restricted stock (pro-rated according to
the duration of their service) and the Chief Financial Officer was eligible to earn a maximum of
$114,330 cash and $114,330 worth of restricted stock. These MBOs and target incentive compensation
amounts reflect the Compensation Committees belief that annual incentives should be closely
aligned with financial performance.
51
Table of Contents
The Compensation Committee evaluates the Companys performance after each completed fiscal
year to determine the amount of cash and the number of shares of restricted stock each participant
has earned.
Material Terms of Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
The Named Executive Officers were not entitled to receive discretionary payments which would
be characterized as Bonus payments for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009. Amounts listed for each of 2010 and 2009 in the Summary Compensation Table under the column
entitled Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation, were approved by the Compensation Committee on
February 16, 2011 and February 23, 2010, respectively. These payments are intended to compensate
the executive officers for services rendered in fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Compensation Committee considers annual performance-based cash awards to be a motivational
method for encouraging and rewarding individual performance that contributes to our overall company
performance. Target performance-based compensation amounts are positioned to be competitive with
market data and for awards based on performance in fiscal year 2010 ranged as a percentage of
salary from 60% to 80% for the Named Executive Officers with an increasing scale if financial
performance was exceeded. These amounts reflect the programs objective to reward individual
performance that contributes to our overall performance.
As shown in the column entitled Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation, of the Summary
Compensation Table, actual cash incentive awards paid to our executive officers pursuant to MBOs
ranged from 40% to 54% of base salary in fiscal 2010. The Compensation Committee did not waive or
modify for any Named Executive Officer any of the specified performance targets, goals or
conditions to payout for performance-based compensation that were in place during fiscal 2010.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Our long-term incentive compensation in the form of stock option and restricted stock awards
is designed to attract and retain key executives, build an integrated management team, reward
innovation and performance, and share long-term successes. The intent is to align executive and
shareholder interests, thereby increasing shareholder value.
Based on the amounts of total compensation listed in the Summary Compensation Table, long-term
variable compensation represented from 32% to 60% of total compensation for the Named Executive
Officers in fiscal year 2010, which is consistent with the committees overall compensation
objectives. During fiscal 2010, long-term variable compensation included an option to purchase
25,000 shares issued to Karen VanDerBosch upon her assumption of the additional duties of Chief
Operating Officer and an option to purchase 50,000 shares issued to Jeffrey Koch upon his
appointment as Chief Executive Officer.
Material Terms of Option Grants
Prior to adoption of the Executive Plan, our practice was to occasionally grant executives
options to purchase shares of MakeMusic common stock as a form of compensation at the time of hire
or following
performance evaluations. The grants were based on a subject evaluation, in consideration of the
executives prior performance, contributions to the Company, level of responsibility, other
compensation, ability to influence our long-term growth and profitability, and prior stock option
grants. Under the Executive Plan, the Compensation Committee has authority to grant options to our
Named Executive Officers and other employees when 80% of target performance is met or surpassed for
all MBOs.
On February 1, 2010, we granted seven-year incentive stock options to Ronald Raup and Karen
VanDerBosch in recognition of performance during the 2009 fiscal year. Because the options were
granted in 2010, they are classified as 2010 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table. Mr.
Raup and Ms. VanDerBosch each received an option to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock. The
shares vest ratably over 48 months beginning February 28, 2010 and ceasing January 31, 2014. The
options have an exercise price of $4.56. Mr. Raup forfeited the unvested portion of his award upon
his separation from service.
52
Table of Contents
On November 10, 2010, we granted a five-year incentive stock option to Jeffrey Koch upon
hiring him to serve as interim chief executive officer. The option allows Mr. Koch to purchase
50,000 shares at an exercise price of $5.35 per share. On November 30, 2010, we granted a
seven-year stock option to Karen VanDerBosch in recognition of her appointment as Chief Operating
Officer. The option allows Ms. VanDerBosch to purchase 25,000 shares at an exercise price of $5.00
per share.
Option grants to executives are made under the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and are subject to
the terms of our form of incentive stock option agreement. The form of agreement provides that the
exercise price of a grant is equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. The form of
agreement also provides that if the executive leaves MakeMusic for any reason other than death,
vesting immediately ceases and options expire in 90 days after the end of employment. In the event
of the termination of an employees relationship with MakeMusic in connection with a change of
control event, all unvested shares of stock subject to the option grant shall immediately vest.
Incentive stock options typically vest over a four-year period.
Material Terms of Restricted Stock Awards
We granted restricted stock awards in 2010, for performance in 2009. In March 2010, the
Compensation Committee granted restricted stock awards in the amount of 24,926 shares to Ron Raup
and 16,012 shares to Karen VanDerBosch. The restricted stock awards were granted to the Named
Executive Officers under the Executive Plan, based on achievement in fiscal 2009 of MBOs for that
year. Ron Raup was eligible for 45,836 shares of restricted stock (with a value of $172,800 based
on the average share price for the three months preceding the fiscal year in which the award was
earned), and Karen VanDerBosch was eligible for 29,443 shares of restricted stock (with a value of
$111,000 based on the average share price for the three months preceding the fiscal year in which
the award was earned).
Under the Executive Plan and the 2010 MBOs, Ron Raup was eligible for 41,800 shares of
restricted stock (with a value of $177,984, based on the average share price for the three months
preceding the fiscal year in which the award was earned), pro-rated according to the duration of
his service, and Karen VanDerBosch was eligible for 28,851 shares of restricted stock (with a value
of $114,330, based on the average share price for the three months preceding the fiscal year in
which the award was earned). For the period from November 10, 2010 to December 31, 2010 Jeffrey
Koch was eligible for 5,868 shares of restricted stock (with a value of $24,986, based on the
average share price for the three months preceding the fiscal year in which the award was earned).
On February 16, 2011 the Compensation Committee evaluated achievement of the MBOs in fiscal 2010
based on our audited financial statements. The Compensation Committee awarded 6,292 shares of
restricted stock to Ron Raup, 951 shares of restricted stock to Jeffrey Koch and 4,320 shares of
restricted stock to Karen VanDerBosch effective March 15, 2011. Because the awards were made in
2011, they are not reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.
Restricted stock awards are made under our 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and are subject to the
terms thereof and our form of restricted stock award agreement. The risks of forfeiture on the
earned shares of restricted stock lapse immediately on the delivery date as to twenty-five percent
of the award and in twenty-five percent increments during the following three years. If a
participant voluntarily terminates employment without good reason or has been terminated by the
Company for cause, he or she will forfeit any portion of the award that remains restricted.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth all of the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to (i)
each individual who served as our principal executive officer during the fiscal year ended December
31, 2010; and (ii) each other individual that served as an executive officer at the conclusion of
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and who received total compensation in excess of $100,000
during such fiscal year. We refer to these individuals as our Named Executive Officers.
53
Table of Contents
Change in Pension | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Equity | Nonqualified | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Option | Incentive Plan | Deferred | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bonus | Awards | Awards | Compensation | Compensation | All Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salary | (1) | (2) | (2) | (1) | Earnings | Compensation | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position | Year | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey A. Koch |
2010 | $ | 31,233 | | | $ | 122,083 | (3) | $ | 17,007 | | $ | 31,875 | (4) | $ | 202,198 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interim Chief Executive Officer |
2009 | | | | | | | $ | 60,956 | (5) | $ | 60,965 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Karen L. VanDerBosch |
2010 | $ | 191,954 | | $ | 96,873 | $ | 186,142 | (6) | $ | 77,257 | | | $ | 552,226 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer |
2009 | $ | 185,000 | | $ | 10,008 | $ | 32,170 | $ | 77,700 | | | $ | 304,878 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ronald B. Raup |
2010 | $ | 210,786 | | $ | 150,802 | 113,978 | (7) | $ | 112,510 | | $ | 250,047 | (8) | $ | 838,120 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Former Chief Executive Officer |
2009 | $ | 216,000 | | $ | 16,175 | $ | 45,039 | $ | 120,960 | | $ | 1,000 | $ | 399,174 |
(1) | The Bonus column is used by us to include only discretionary bonus payments apart from our non-equity incentive compensation plans. Payments under such incentive plans, including payments for achieving certain financial performance goals, are set forth in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column. Payments under the 2008 Executive Compensation Plan were made in 2010 for services and performance during 2009, and payments under the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan have been made in 2011 for services and performance during 2010. | |
(2) | Represents the grant date fair value of options awarded during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensation, for outstanding performance-based share or unit grants (Stock Awards column) and option awards (Option Awards column) under the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended with shareholder approval in 2006 and 2008 (the 2003 Plan). The assumptions used to determine the valuation of the 2010 awards are discussed in Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements. See the table entitled Outstanding Equity Awards at 2010 Fiscal Year End and the narrative discussion entitled Material Terms of Option Grants and Material Terms of Restricted Stock Awards for further information regarding option awards and stock awards. The assumptions used to determine the valuation of the 2009 awards are discussed in Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. | |
(3) | Mr. Koch was issued an option to purchase 50,000 shares upon his appointment as the Companys Interim Chief Executive Officer. | |
(4) | Includes $25,875 in Director Fees paid while Mr. Koch was the Chairman of the Board of Directors from January 1, 2010 to November 1, 2010 and $6,000 in temporary housing and travel expenses paid from November 10, 2010 to December 31, 2010. | |
(5) | Fee for consulting services provided to the Company by Mr. Koch. | |
(6) | Includes an option to purchase 25,000 shares, issued in recognition of Ms. VanDerBosch assuming the additional duties of Chief Operating Officer and an option to purchase 40,000 shares issued in 2010 for performance in the 2009 fiscal year. | |
(7) | Includes 40,000 options awarded during the 2010 fiscal year, 31,670 of which were forfeited upon Mr. Raups separation from the Company. | |
(8) | Includes the following compensation paid in accordance with the Separation Agreement and Release between Mr. Raup and the Company dated November 10, 2010: $222,480 in severance compensation ($9,270 of which was paid in 2010 and $213,210 of which will be paid in 2011) and $27,567 of accrued but unused vacation time. |
54
Table of Contents
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2010 Fiscal Year End
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | Incentive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Incentive | Plan | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plan | Awards: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | Awards: | Market or | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Incentive Plan | Number of | Payout | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Awards: | Market | Unearned | Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Value of | Shares, | of Unearned | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Number of | Securities | Number of | Shares of | Units or | Shares, Units | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities | Securities | Underlying | Shares or | Units of | Other | or other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Underlying | Underlying | Unexercised | Option | Units of | Stock that | Rights that | Rights that | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unexercised | Unexercised | Unearned | Exercise | Option | Stock that | Have not | have not | have not | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Options | Options | Options | Price | Expiration | have not Vested | Vested | Vested | Vested | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | (#) Exercisable | (#) Unexercisable | (#) | ($) | Date | (#) | ($) | (#) | ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey A. Koch |
8,332 | 41,668 | (1) | | $ | 5.35 | 11/10/2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Karen L. VanDerBosch |
30,000 | 0 | (2) | | $ | 6.14 | 12/7/2013 | 2,224 | (3) | $ | 11,698.24 | (9) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
14,976 | 5,024 | 4) | | $ | 10.15 | 1/2/2015 | 12,009 | (10) | $ | 63,167.34 | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7,488 | 7,512 | (5) | | $ | 3.50 | 1/7/2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9,163 | 30,837 | (6) | | $ | 4.56 | 1/31/2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,040 | 23,960 | (7) | | $ | 5.00 | 11/29/2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ronald B. Raup |
2,664 | 0 | (8) | | $ | 4.90 | 2/1/2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
85,000 | 0 | (8) | $ | 6.00 | 2/15/2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8,330 | 0 | (8) | | $ | 4.56 | 1/31/2007 |
(1) | Monthly vesting 4,166 options for 3 months and 4,167 for 9 months beginning February 10, 2011. | |
(2) | Options are fully vested. | |
(3) | On March 2, 2009, Ms. VanDerBosch was awarded 4,448 shares of restricted stock under the 2008 Executive Compensation Plan for exceeding the target level of operating margins for the 2008 fiscal year. The risks of forfeiture lapse as to 25% of the award each year beginning on March 2, 2009, and ending on March 2, 2012, provided that Ms. VanDerBosch does not voluntarily terminate her employment without good reason and is not terminated for cause. | |
(4) | Monthly vesting 416 options for 47 months and 448 for 1 month beginning January 31, 2008. | |
(5) | Monthly vesting 312 for 47 months and 336 for 1 month beginning January 31, 2009 | |
(6) | Monthly vesting 833 for 47 months and 849 for 1 month beginning February 28, 2010. | |
(7) | Monthly vesting 520 options for 47 months and 560 for 1 month beginning November 30, 2010. | |
(8) | Options are fully vested. | |
(9) | The amounts reflect the value based on the closing price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2010 of $5.26. | |
(10) | On March 15, 2010, Ms. VanDerBosch was awarded 16,012 shares of restricted stock under the Executive Plan for exceeding the target level of operating margins for the 2009 fiscal year. The risks of forfeiture lapse as to 25% of the award each year beginning on March 15, 2011, and ending on March 15, 2014, provided that Ms. VanDerBosch does not voluntarily terminate her employment without good reason and is not terminated for cause. |
55
Table of Contents
Director Compensation
In 2010, each director was compensated in accordance with the MakeMusic, Inc. Board
Compensation Plan adopted on February 15, 2007, amended on January 31, 2008 and further amended on
January 28, 2009 (the 2009 Board Compensation Plan). Each non-employee director who was serving
at the beginning of fiscal 2010 received $5,000 per calendar quarter for Board membership and
$2,500 per calendar quarter for serving as the board or committee chairperson. Each eligible
director also received an annual non-qualified stock option grant to purchase 4,000 shares of
MakeMusics common stock, with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of common stock on
the date of the grant. An eligible director is defined as a non-employee member of the Board who is
not (i) otherwise compensated by MakeMusic or (ii) a representative of a shareholder who
beneficially owns 5% or more of our common stock. The options were issued under the 2003 Equity
Incentive Plan, have a four-year term and vested ratably over twelve months. In the event a
directors service terminated for any reason or if the director was no longer an eligible director,
vesting of the option would have ceased with the director having the right to exercise any vested
shares through the remaining term of the option.
Effective January 1, 2011, the Board amended the Board Compensation Plan (the 2011 Board
Compensation Plan) to provide for a $40,000 cash retainer for all directors, an additional $10,000
cash retainer for the chairs of the Board and each of the committees, and, for each non-management
director, an annual option grant to purchase 6,000 shares. In accordance with the 2011 Board
Compensation Plan, on January 4, 2011, the Board granted each of Trevor DSouza, Keith Fenhaus,
Robert Morrison, Graham Richmond, and Michael Skinner options to purchase 6,000 shares of stock,
which vest in monthly increments over the course of one year.
When Trevor DSouza joined the Board in March 2010, he was not eligible to receive a stock
option grant under the 2009 Board Compensation Plan due to his status as a representative of
LaunchEquity Partners, LLC, a 5% shareholder of the Company. On January 11, 2011, following the
adoption of the 2011 Board Compensation Plan, which does not contain a limitation on stock option
grants to representatives of 5% shareholders, the Board awarded Mr. DSouza an option to Purchase
3,333 shares of the Companys stock in recognition of his service during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2010.
56
Table of Contents
2010 Director Compensation Table
The following table sets forth certain information regarding compensation paid to and earned
by the non-employee directors who served on MakeMusics Board of Directors during the 2010 fiscal
year.
Change in Pension | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fees | Nonqualified | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earned or | Non-Equity | Deferred | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paid in | Stock | Option | Incentive Plan | Compensation | All Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash(1) | Awards | Awards(2) | Compensation | Earnings | Compensation | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Michael Cahr(3) |
$ | 17,250 | | $ | 8,534 | | | | $ | 25,344 | ||||||||||||||||||
Trevor A. DSouza(4) |
$ | 16,667 | | $ | 0 | | | | $ | 16,667 | ||||||||||||||||||
Keith Fenhaus |
$ | 30,000 | | $ | 8,534 | | | | $ | 38,108 | ||||||||||||||||||
Robert Morrison |
$ | 30,000 | | $ | 8,534 | | | | $ | 38,108 | ||||||||||||||||||
Graham Richmond |
$ | 30,000 | | $ | 8,534 | | | | $ | 38,108 | ||||||||||||||||||
Michael Skinner |
$ | 30,000 | | $ | 8,534 | | | | $ | 38,108 | ||||||||||||||||||
Andrew C. Stephens(5) |
$ | 13,917 | | $ | 0 | | | | $ | 13,917 |
(1) | All directors received the amount of cash compensation to which they were entitled under the Board Compensation Plan, as described in the paragraphs directly preceding this Director Compensation Table in the section entitled Director Compensation. | |
(2) | Represents the grant date fair value of options awarded during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensation. The assumptions used to determine the valuation of the awards are discussed in Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements, contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report. At fiscal year end the aggregate number of option awards outstanding for each non-employee director named in the table above was as follows: Michael Cahr, 6,999; Trevor DSouza, 0; Keith Fenhaus, 15,333; Robert Morrison, 14,000; Graham Richmond, 18,000; and Michael Skinner, 16,000; Andrew Stephens, 0. | |
(3) | Michael Cahr resigned from his position as a director on November 10, 2010. | |
(4) | Trevor DSouza joined the Board of Directors on March 2, 2010 pursuant to an agreement between MakeMusic, LaunchEquity Partners, LLC and LaunchEquity Acquisition Partners, LLC Designated Series Education Partners. Mr. DSouza was not eligible for an annual stock option grant at the time he joined the Board due to his status as a representative of the LaunchEquity entities. As a result, following the January 1, 2011 amendment to the Board Compensation Policy, Mr. DSouza was granted an additional option to purchase $3,333 shares on January 11, 2011 in recognition of his service during the 2010 fiscal year. | |
(5) | Andrew Stephens joined the Board of Directors on March 2, 2010 pursuant to an agreement between MakeMusic, Launch Equity Partners, LLC and LaunchEquity Acquisition Partners, LLC Designated Series Education Partners. Mr. Stephens resigned from his position as director on November 10, 2010. |
57
Table of Contents
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table provides information concerning persons known to us to be the beneficial
owners of more than 5% of our outstanding Common Stock as of March 4, 2011. Unless otherwise
indicated, the shareholders listed in the table have sole voting and investment powers with respect
to the shares indicated.
Name and Address | Number of Shares | Percent | ||||||
of Beneficial Owner | Beneficially Owned | of Class | ||||||
LaunchEquity Partners, LLC Designated Series Education Partners |
1,362,829 | (1) | 27.9 | % | ||||
4230 N Oakland Ave #317 Shorewood, WI 53211-2042 |
(1) | Represents shares held by LaunchEquity Acquisition Partners, LLC Designated Series Education Partners, a designated series of a Delaware series limited liability company (LEAP), as set forth in the most recent Schedule 13D/A filed by LaunchEquity Partners, LLC with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2010. LEAP is solely managed by LaunchEquity Partners, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, which is solely managed by Andrew C. Stephens. LaunchEquity Partners, LLC and Andrew C. Stephens, as manager, have voting and dispositive power over all the shares held by LEAP. |
MANAGEMENT SHAREHOLDINGS
The following table sets forth the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned as of
March 4, 2011, by each of our Named Executive Officers, by each director and by all directors and
executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the shareholders listed in the table
have sole voting and investment powers with respect to the shares indicated.
Name of Beneficial | Number of Shares | Percent | ||||||
Owner or Identity of Group | Beneficially Owned | of Class(1) | ||||||
Jeffrey A. Koch |
89,915 | (2) | 1.84 | % | ||||
Karen L. VanDerBosch |
91,451 | (3) | 1.87 | % | ||||
Trevor A. DSouza |
5,333 | (4) | * | |||||
Keith A. Fenhaus |
17,333 | (4) | * | |||||
Robert B. Morrison |
16,000 | (4) | * | |||||
Graham Richmond |
20,000 | (4) | * | |||||
Michael Skinner |
18,000 | (4) | * | |||||
All current executive officers and directors
as a group (7 persons) |
258,032 | (5) | 5.28 | % |
* | Less than 1% | |
(1) | Based on 4,890,191 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding as of March 4, 2011. Shares not outstanding but deemed beneficially owned by virtue of the right of a person to acquire them as of March 4, 2011, or within sixty days of such date, are treated as outstanding only when determining the percent owned by such individual and when determining the percent owned by a group. | |
(2) | Represents shares held by The Koch Family Trust (the Trust). Mr. Koch is trustee of the Trust and thus has voting and dispositive power over all the shares held by the Trust. Mr. Koch disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares in the Trust except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Includes 24,996 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options that are exercisable as of March 4, 2011 or within 60 days of such date. | |
(3) | Includes 70,991 shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options that are exercisable as of March 4, 2011 or within 60 days of such date. |
58
Table of Contents
(4) | Represents shares that may be purchased upon exercise of options that are exercisable as of March 4, 2011 or within 60 days of such date. | |
(5) | Includes 172,653 shares that may be purchased by all officers and directors as a group upon exercise of options exercisable as of March 4, 2011 or within 60 days of such date. |
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table provides information concerning our equity compensation plans as of
December 31, 2010:
Number of | ||||||||||||
securities | ||||||||||||
remaining | ||||||||||||
available for | ||||||||||||
future issuance | ||||||||||||
Number of | under equity | |||||||||||
securities to be | compensation plans | |||||||||||
issued upon | Weighted-average | (excluding | ||||||||||
exercise of | exercise price of | securities | ||||||||||
outstanding | outstanding | reflected in | ||||||||||
options | options | column (a) | ||||||||||
Plan category | (a) | (b) | (c) | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
504,536 | $ | 5.51 | 361,103 | ||||||||
Total |
504,536 | $ | 5.51 | 361,103 |
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
There were no related party transactions in 2010 or 2009.
Director Independence
The Board has determined that currently and at all times during the year ended December 31,
2010, a majority of its members are independent as defined by the listing standards of the Nasdaq
Stock Market. The Board considers in its evaluation of independence any existing related-party
transactions, and the Boards determination is based on its belief that none of the independent
directors have any relationships that, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, would interfere
with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The
current independent directors are Trevor DSouza, Keith Fenhaus, Robert Morrison, Graham Richmond,
and Michael Skinner. In determining the independence of Mr. Morrison and Mr. Koch, the board has
considered the paid consulting services that Mr. Morrison may provide from time to time. Mr. Koch
is precluded from being considered independent since he currently serves as an executive officer of
MakeMusic.
59
Table of Contents
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Audit Fees
The following table sets forth the approximate fees billed by our principal accountant in 2009
and 2010:
December 31 | ||||||||
2009 | 2010 | |||||||
Audit Fees (1) |
$ | 202,000 | $ | 160,000 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees |
| | ||||||
Tax Fees (2) |
78,000 | 49,000 | ||||||
All Other Fees |
| | ||||||
$ | 280,000 | $ | 209,000 |
(1) Fees paid to McGladrey & Pullen, LLP for professional services rendered for the audit of
our annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in our Forms 10-K and
10-Q and attendance at Audit Committee meetings and review of documents filed with the SEC.
(2) Fees paid to RSM McGladrey, Inc. for services provided in connection with preparation of
federal and state tax returns, and tax consulting projects.
Our Audit Committee has considered whether provision of the above non-audit services is
compatible with maintaining the independence of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP and has determined that
such services are compatible with maintaining their independence.
Pre-Approval of Audit Fees
The Audit Committee is responsible for pre-approving all audit and permitted non-audit
services to be performed for MakeMusic by its independent auditors or any other auditing or
accounting firm. Unless a particular service has received general pre-approval by the Audit
Committee, each service provided must be specifically pre-approved. Any proposed services exceeding
pre-approved cost levels will also require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.
Pursuant to its pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee has pre-approved certain non-audit
services, including certain tax services. All of the non-audit services rendered by McGladrey &
Pullen, LLP during 2010 and 2009 were pre-approved in accordance with this policy.
60
Table of Contents
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) | Documents filed as part of this report. |
(1) | Financial Statements. The following financial statements are included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: | ||
Report of McGladrey & Pullen LLP on Financial Statements as of and for the periods ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 | |||
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 | |||
Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 | |||
Statements of Shareholders Equity for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 | |||
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 | |||
Notes to Financial Statements | |||
(2) | Financial Statement Schedules. The following consolidated financial statement schedules are included in Item 8: Not applicable. | ||
(3) | Exhibits. See Exhibit Index to Form 10-K immediately following the signature page of this Form 10-K for a description of the documents that are filed as Exhibits to this report or incorporated by reference herein. |
61
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized
MakeMusic, Inc. |
||||
Dated: March 4, 2011 | By: | /s/ Jeffrey A. Koch | ||
Jeffrey A. Koch, Interim Chief Executive Officer | ||||
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this Report has been signed by the following persons on
behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
(Power of Attorney)
Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Jeffrey A. Koch and Karen L.
VanDerBosch as true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person,
hereby ratifying and confirming all said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Signature and Title | Date | |
/s/ Jeffrey A. Koch
|
March 4, 2011 | |
/s/ Karen L. VanDerBosch
|
March 4, 2011 | |
/s/ Robert Morrison
|
March 4, 2011 | |
/s/ Trevor A. DSouza
|
March 4, 2011 | |
/s/ Keith A. Fenhaus
|
March 4, 2011 | |
/s/ Graham Richmond
|
March 4, 2011 | |
/s/ Michael R. Skinner
|
March 4, 2011 |
62
Table of Contents
MAKEMUSIC, INC.
EXHIBIT INDEX FOR
FORM 10-K FOR 2010 FISCAL YEAR
EXHIBIT INDEX FOR
FORM 10-K FOR 2010 FISCAL YEAR
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
3.1
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation as amended incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 | |
3.2
|
Bylaws as amended incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Form 8-K filed December 10, 2007 | |
4.1
|
Form of specimen certificate representing common stock of MakeMusic, Inc. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 | |
10.1*
|
MakeMusic 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended through November 24, 2008 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 | |
10.2*
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the MakeMusic 2003 Equity Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrants Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 | |
10.3*
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the MakeMusic 2003 Equity Incentive Plan as amended March 15, 2007 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 | |
10.4*
|
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the MakeMusic 2003 Equity Incentive Plan as amended March 15, 2007 filed herewith | |
10.5*
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the MakeMusic 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended March 15, 2010 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 | |
10.6*
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the MakeMusic 2003 Equity Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 | |
10.7*
|
Board Compensation Plan effective February 15, 2007, as amended January 31, 2008 and as further amended January 28, 2009 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. | |
10.8*
|
Board Compensation Plan effective February 15, 2007, as amended January 31, 2008, January 28, 2009, and January 1, 2011 filed herewith | |
10.9*
|
Employment Agreement dated May 8, 2009 between the Registrant and Ronald B. Raup incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 | |
10.12*
|
Employment Agreement dated May 8, 2009 between the Registrant and Karen L. VanDerBosch incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 | |
10.15*
|
2009 Executive Compensation Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 | |
10.16
|
Agreement dated March 2, 2010 among the Registrant, LaunchEquity Partners, LLC and LaunchEquity Acquisition Partners, LLC Designated Series Education Partners incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants 8-K filed March 3, 2010 | |
10.17*
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Jeffrey Koch dated November 10, 2010 filed herewith. |
63
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
10.18*
|
Separation Agreement and Release between the Registrant and Ron Raup dated November 10, 2010 filed herewith. | |
23.1
|
Consent of McGladrey & Pullen LLP, independent registered public accounting firm filed herewith. | |
24.1
|
Power of Attorney (included on the Signatures page of this Form 10-K) filed herewith. | |
31.1
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 filed herewith. | |
31.2
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 filed herewith. | |
32.1
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 filed herewith. | |
32.2
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 filed herewith. |
* | Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-K. |
64