Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - PETSMART INC | p18237exv32w2.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - PETSMART INC | p18237exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - PETSMART INC | p18237exv31w2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - PETSMART INC | p18237exv31w1.htm |
EX-15.1 - EX-15.1 - PETSMART INC | p18237exv15w1.htm |
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - PETSMART INC | Financial_Report.xls |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Thirteen Weeks Ended October 31, 2010
OR
o | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from ___to ___
Commission file number: 0-21888
PetSmart, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 94-3024325 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
19601 N. 27th Avenue | ||
Phoenix, Arizona | 85027 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(623) 580-6100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of Common Stock, as
of the latest practicable date:
Common Stock, $.0001 Par Value, 117,604,890 Shares at November 12, 2010
PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries
INDEX
INDEX
Page | ||||||||
Number | ||||||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) |
||||||||
Item 1. Financial Statements |
||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
13 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
EX-15.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
2
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
PetSmart, Inc.
Phoenix, Arizona
PetSmart, Inc.
Phoenix, Arizona
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets of PetSmart, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of October 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009, and the related condensed
consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the thirteen week and thirty-nine
week periods ended October 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009, and of cash flows for the thirty-nine
week periods ended October 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009. These interim financial statements are
the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such
condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of PetSmart, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of January 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our
report dated March 25, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheet as of January 31, 2010, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to
the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
November 24, 2010
November 24, 2010
3
Table of Contents
PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except par value)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except par value)
(Unaudited)
October 31, | January 31, | November 1, | ||||||||||
2010 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 235,407 | $ | 308,360 | $ | 185,215 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
46,515 | 48,172 | 55,250 | |||||||||
Receivables, net |
43,108 | 52,232 | 52,144 | |||||||||
Merchandise inventories |
687,825 | 563,389 | 608,274 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
36,805 | 36,805 | 29,333 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
91,822 | 57,652 | 88,126 | |||||||||
Total current assets |
1,141,482 | 1,066,610 | 1,018,342 | |||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
1,150,286 | 1,201,857 | 1,225,116 | |||||||||
Equity investment in investee |
38,691 | 32,486 | 30,865 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
86,199 | 94,901 | 83,631 | |||||||||
Goodwill |
43,555 | 42,200 | 41,882 | |||||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
29,140 | 23,932 | 24,192 | |||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,489,353 | $ | 2,461,986 | $ | 2,424,028 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||
Accounts payable and bank overdraft |
$ | 201,564 | $ | 212,121 | $ | 179,709 | ||||||
Accrued payroll, bonus and employee benefits |
125,563 | 105,162 | 103,526 | |||||||||
Accrued occupancy expenses and deferred rents |
67,606 | 63,142 | 65,495 | |||||||||
Current maturities of capital lease obligations |
43,503 | 37,839 | 36,151 | |||||||||
Other current liabilities |
155,655 | 146,965 | 126,745 | |||||||||
Total current liabilities |
593,891 | 565,229 | 511,626 | |||||||||
Capital lease obligations |
528,270 | 533,635 | 545,226 | |||||||||
Deferred rents |
87,479 | 91,030 | 91,695 | |||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
107,078 | 99,377 | 97,225 | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,316,718 | 1,289,271 | 1,245,772 | |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||||||
Preferred stock; $.0001 par value; 10,000 shares authorized,
none issued and outstanding |
| | | |||||||||
Common stock; $.0001 par value; 625,000 shares authorized,
162,042, 160,311 and 160,048 shares issued |
16 | 16 | 16 | |||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
1,201,158 | 1,148,228 | 1,137,132 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
1,201,957 | 1,093,708 | 1,030,753 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
4,478 | 2,369 | 2,053 | |||||||||
Less: Treasury stock, at cost, 44,543, 39,517 and 36,471 shares |
(1,234,974 | ) | (1,071,606 | ) | (991,698 | ) | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,172,635 | 1,172,715 | 1,178,256 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 2,489,353 | $ | 2,461,986 | $ | 2,424,028 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
For the Thirteen Weeks Ended | For the Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | October 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | |||||||||||||
Merchandise sales |
$ | 1,230,911 | $ | 1,157,647 | $ | 3,681,188 | $ | 3,496,995 | ||||||||
Services sales |
148,282 | 136,703 | 466,874 | 433,714 | ||||||||||||
Other revenue |
8,877 | | 25,701 | | ||||||||||||
Net sales |
1,388,070 | 1,294,350 | 4,173,763 | 3,930,709 | ||||||||||||
Cost of merchandise sales |
880,556 | 837,875 | 2,619,624 | 2,516,378 | ||||||||||||
Cost of services sales |
109,652 | 100,299 | 338,866 | 311,491 | ||||||||||||
Cost of other revenue |
8,877 | | 25,701 | | ||||||||||||
Total cost of sales |
999,085 | 938,174 | 2,984,191 | 2,827,869 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
388,985 | 356,176 | 1,189,572 | 1,102,840 | ||||||||||||
Operating, general and administrative expenses |
305,345 | 284,896 | 910,664 | 867,902 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
83,640 | 71,280 | 278,908 | 234,938 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(14,289 | ) | (15,031 | ) | (44,222 | ) | (44,975 | ) | ||||||||
Income before income tax expense and
equity in income from investee |
69,351 | 56,249 | 234,686 | 189,963 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(26,386 | ) | (20,453 | ) | (91,300 | ) | (71,594 | ) | ||||||||
Equity in income from investee |
2,648 | 2,274 | 6,205 | 4,927 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
45,613 | 38,070 | 149,591 | 123,296 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of
income tax: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
387 | (125 | ) | 2,109 | 4,767 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 46,000 | $ | 37,945 | $ | 151,700 | $ | 128,063 | ||||||||
Earnings per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 1.00 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.38 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 0.98 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
116,943 | 121,661 | 117,333 | 123,163 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
119,360 | 123,781 | 119,771 | 125,396 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
For the Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended | ||||||||
October 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 149,591 | $ | 123,296 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
176,221 | 177,001 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
6,104 | 3,937 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
21,316 | 18,485 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
7,456 | 8,388 | ||||||
Equity in income from investee |
(6,205 | ) | (4,927 | ) | ||||
Tax benefits from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized |
(7,063 | ) | (1,939 | ) | ||||
Non-cash interest expense |
234 | 853 | ||||||
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Merchandise inventories |
(123,503 | ) | (21,889 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
(29,936 | ) | (9,494 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable |
(16,929 | ) | 3,330 | |||||
Accrued payroll, bonus and employee benefits |
20,233 | 14,794 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
15,542 | 31,538 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
213,061 | 343,373 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash and short-term investments |
1,657 | (55,250 | ) | |||||
Cash paid for property and equipment |
(88,811 | ) | (86,957 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
164 | 3,867 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(86,990 | ) | (138,340 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net proceeds from common stock traded under stock incentive plans |
33,810 | 7,252 | ||||||
Minimum statutory withholding requirements |
(5,410 | ) | (3,373 | ) | ||||
Cash paid for treasury stock |
(163,368 | ) | (84,875 | ) | ||||
Payments of capital lease obligations |
(39,663 | ) | (28,660 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in bank overdraft |
6,081 | (19,682 | ) | |||||
Tax benefits from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized |
7,063 | 1,939 | ||||||
Cash dividends paid to stockholders |
(38,716 | ) | (20,101 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(200,203 | ) | (147,500 | ) | ||||
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
1,179 | 1,368 | ||||||
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(72,953 | ) | 58,901 | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
308,360 | 126,314 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | 235,407 | $ | 185,215 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 GENERAL
PetSmart, Inc., including its wholly owned subsidiaries (the Company, PetSmart or we),
is the leading specialty provider of products, services and solutions for the lifetime needs of
pets in North America. We offer a broad line of products for all the life stages of pets, as well
as various pet services including professional grooming, training, boarding and day camp. We also
offer pet products through an e-commerce site. As of October 31, 2010, we operated 1,172 retail
stores and had full-service veterinary hospitals in 765 of our stores. MMI Holdings, Inc., through
a wholly owned subsidiary, Medical Management International, Inc., collectively referred to as
Banfield, operated 754 of the veterinary hospitals under the registered trade name of Banfield,
The Pet Hospital. The remaining 11 hospitals are operated by other third parties in Canada.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, for
interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes
required by GAAP for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal,
recurring nature, necessary for the fair statement of results for the interim periods presented.
These condensed consolidated financial statements, which are unaudited, should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010. Differing from our presentation in our
previously filed Form 10-K, we have combined the receivables, net, other noncurrent assets, and
prepaid expenses and other current assets line items in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows into a single line item called other assets. Further, we have combined the accrued
occupancy expenses and current deferred rents, other current liabilities, deferred rents and other
noncurrent liabilities line items in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows into a
single line item called other liabilities. Prior year amounts have been combined to conform to this
condensed presentation. Finally, for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010,
Banfield license fees and operating expense reimbursements, and the related costs, have been
separately presented on a gross basis as detailed in Note 4.
Due to the seasonal nature of our business, the results of operations for the thirteen and
thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results expected
for the full year. Our fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks and ends on the Sunday nearest
January 31. Fiscal 2010 ends on January 30, 2011, while fiscal 2009 ended on January 31, 2010, both
of which are 52 week years. Unless otherwise specified, all references to years in these condensed
consolidated financial statements are to fiscal years.
NOTE 2 DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
We use foreign currency exchange forward contracts, or Foreign Exchange Contracts, to manage
the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations related to certain balance sheet
accounts. We enter into the Foreign Exchange Contracts in Canada primarily to mitigate risk
related to non-functional currency exposures. These Foreign Exchange Contracts are not designated
as hedges and are recorded at fair value using quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in
active markets. The changes in the fair value are recognized in operating, general and
administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive
Income.
At October 31, 2010, we had Foreign Exchange Contracts outstanding with a notional amount of
$5.0 million, which represents the amount of foreign currencies to be purchased or sold at maturity
and does not represent our exposure on these contracts. The fair value of the liability related to
these Foreign Exchange Contracts included in other current liabilities was immaterial at October
31, 2010. During the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, we recorded $0.1
million and $0.3 million in losses on the Foreign Exchange Contracts, respectively. We did not
enter into Foreign Exchange Contracts during 2009.
NOTE 3 INCOME TAXES
We establish deferred income tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the
financial reporting bases and the income tax bases of our assets and liabilities at enacted tax
rates expected to be in effect when such assets or liabilities are realized or settled. We record a
valuation allowance on the deferred income tax assets to reduce the total to an amount we believe
is more likely than not to be realized.
We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a
component of income tax expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and
Comprehensive Income. We believe it is reasonably possible that approximately
7
Table of Contents
$0.4 million of our current remaining unrecognized tax positions may be recognized by October
31, 2011, as a result of settlements or a lapse of the statute of limitations.
As of October 31, 2010, our gross tax liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions,
excluding interest and penalties, were $7.8 million. Based on the uncertainties associated with the
settlement of these types of items, we are unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of
potential cash settlements, if any, with taxing authorities.
We generally do not materially adjust deferred tax assets as part of our interim income tax
provision. During the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, changes in deferred tax assets were
due to tax benefits related to stock-based compensation and changes in accumulated other
comprehensive income. During the interim periods, we recognize the provision for income taxes in
other current liabilities or prepaid expenses and other current assets in the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets, as appropriate. The provision is calculated based on our estimated
annual effective income tax rate applied to pretax income. As a result, a reclassification between
other current liabilities and deferred income tax assets and liabilities is likely to occur during
the fourth quarter of 2010.
At October 31, 2010, accrued taxes of $32.0 million related to sales taxes and income taxes
were included in other current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
NOTE 4 INVESTMENTS
We have an investment in Banfield which is accounted for using the equity method of
accounting. Our ownership interest in the stock of Banfield was as follows (in thousands):
October 31, 2010 | January 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Voting common stock and preferred stock |
4,693 | $ | 21,675 | 4,693 | $ | 21,675 | 4,693 | $ | 21,675 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in income from investee |
| 17,016 | | 10,811 | | 9,190 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total equity investment in affiliate |
4,693 | $ | 38,691 | 4,693 | $ | 32,486 | 4,693 | $ | 30,865 | |||||||||||||||
Our investment consisted of voting common stock, comprising 21.4% of all voting stock as of
October 31, 2010, January 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009. Our ownership percentage as of October
31, 2010, January 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009, considering all classes of stock, voting and
non-voting, was 21.0%.
Banfields financial data is summarized as follows (in thousands):
October 31, 2010 | January 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | ||||||||||
Current assets |
$ | 349,507 | $ | 269,381 | $ | 265,973 | ||||||
Noncurrent assets |
121,975 | 122,934 | 126,798 | |||||||||
Current liabilities |
301,705 | 247,138 | 256,274 | |||||||||
Noncurrent liabilities |
14,172 | 16,216 | 15,603 |
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | October 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 162,011 | $ | 149,924 | $ | 472,665 | $ | 422,073 | ||||||||
Income from operations |
21,696 | 18,036 | 50,342 | 39,675 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
12,609 | 10,821 | 29,549 | 23,445 |
In accordance with our master operating agreement with Banfield, we charge Banfield license
fees for the space used by the veterinary hospitals and for their portion of utilities costs. We
also charge Banfield for its portion of specific operating expenses. Prior to February 1, 2010,
license fees were treated as a reduction of occupancy costs, which are included as a component of
cost of merchandise sales, and reimbursements for specific operating expenses were treated as a
reduction of operating, general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statement
of Income and Comprehensive Income. Beginning February 1, 2010, license fees and the
reimbursements for specific operating expenses are included in other revenue, and the related costs
are included in cost of other revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Other
Comprehensive Income.
We recognized license fees and reimbursements for specific operating expenses from Banfield of
$8.9 million and $8.5 million during the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, and November 1,
2009, respectively, and $25.7 million and $25.2 million during the thirty-nine weeks ended October
31, 2010, and November 1, 2009, respectively. Receivables from Banfield totaled $2.9 million, $2.4
8
Table of Contents
million, and $3.4 million at October 31, 2010, January 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009,
respectively, and were included in receivables, net in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The master operating agreement also includes a provision for the sharing of profits on the
sale of therapeutic pet foods sold in all stores with an operating Banfield hospital. The net sales
and gross profit on the sale of therapeutic pet food are not material to our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
NOTE 5 RESERVE FOR CLOSED STORES
The components of the reserve for closed stores were as follows (in thousands):
October 31, 2010 | January 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | ||||||||||
Total remaining gross occupancy costs |
$ | 35,740 | $ | 33,577 | $ | 35,049 | ||||||
Less: |
||||||||||||
Expected sublease income |
(23,916 | ) | (24,018 | ) | (25,530 | ) | ||||||
Interest costs |
(1,708 | ) | (1,343 | ) | (1,457 | ) | ||||||
Reserve for closed stores |
$ | 10,116 | $ | 8,216 | $ | 8,062 | ||||||
Current portion, included in other current liabilities |
$ | 3,200 | $ | 2,395 | $ | 1,922 | ||||||
Noncurrent portion, included in other noncurrent liabilities |
6,916 | 5,821 | 6,140 | |||||||||
Reserve for closed stores |
$ | 10,116 | $ | 8,216 | $ | 8,062 | ||||||
The activity related to the reserve for closed stores was as follows (in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | October 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | |||||||||||||
Opening balance |
$ | 10,969 | $ | 7,633 | $ | 8,216 | $ | 6,382 | ||||||||
Reserve for new store closures |
155 | 1,025 | 3,706 | 1,025 | ||||||||||||
Changes in sublease assumptions |
| 1,145 | 992 | 3,743 | ||||||||||||
Lease terminations |
| (565 | ) | | (565 | ) | ||||||||||
Other |
190 | 203 | 521 | 611 | ||||||||||||
Charges, net |
345 | 1,808 | 5,219 | 4,814 | ||||||||||||
Payments |
(1,198 | ) | (1,379 | ) | (3,319 | ) | (3,134 | ) | ||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 10,116 | $ | 8,062 | $ | 10,116 | $ | 8,062 | ||||||||
NOTE 6 EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The following table presents a reconciliation of the weighted average shares outstanding used
in the earnings per common share calculations (in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | October 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | |||||||||||||
Basic |
116,943 | 121,661 | 117,333 | 123,163 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Stock options, restricted
stock and performance
share units |
2,417 | 2,120 | 2,438 | 2,233 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
119,360 | 123,781 | 119,771 | 125,396 | ||||||||||||
Certain stock-based compensation awards representing 2.5 million and 3.7 million shares of
common stock in the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009, respectively, and
2.2 million and 6.0 million shares of common stock in the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010,
and November 1, 2009, respectively, were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per
common share because the inclusion of such awards would have been antidilutive for the periods
presented.
NOTE 7 STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Share Purchase Program
9
Table of Contents
In June 2009, the Board of Directors approved a share purchase program authorizing the
purchase of up to $350.0 million of our common stock through January 29, 2012. During the thirteen
weeks ended May 2, 2010, we purchased 3.4 million shares of common stock for $107.1 million under
the June 2009 share purchase program.
In June 2010, the Board of Directors approved a new share purchase program authorizing the
purchase of up to $400.0 million of our common stock through January 29, 2012, replacing the $350.0
million program. During the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, we purchased 1.6 million shares
of common stock for $56.3 million under the June 2010 share purchase program. As of October 31,
2010, $343.7 million remained available under the $400.0 million program.
Dividends
During the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, the Board of Directors declared the
following dividends:
Date | Dividend Amount | Stockholders of | Date | |||||||||
Declared | Per Share | Record Date | Paid | |||||||||
March 23, 2010 |
$ | 0.100 | April 30, 2010 | May 14, 2010 | ||||||||
June 16, 2010 |
$ | 0.125 | July 30, 2010 | August 13, 2010 | ||||||||
September 29, 2010 |
$ | 0.125 | October 29, 2010 | November 12, 2010 |
NOTE 8 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures, and the total income tax benefit
recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income were as
follows (in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | October 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | |||||||||||||
Stock options expense |
$ | 2,533 | $ | 2,051 | $ | 6,965 | $ | 6,225 | ||||||||
Management equity unit expense |
1,912 | 418 | 3,884 | 1,009 | ||||||||||||
Performance share unit expense |
2,061 | 955 | 5,576 | 2,321 | ||||||||||||
Restricted stock expense |
1,837 | 2,937 | 4,891 | 8,930 | ||||||||||||
Total stock-based
compensation expense, net
of forfeitures |
$ | 8,343 | $ | 6,361 | $ | 21,316 | $ | 18,485 | ||||||||
Tax benefit |
$ | 2,954 | $ | 2,165 | $ | 7,430 | $ | 6,596 | ||||||||
At October 31, 2010, the total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated
forfeitures, was $46.0 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.3 years. During the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, there were no grants issued under our
equity incentive plans.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
We have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, that allows employees who meet certain
service requirements to purchase our common stock on semi-annual offering dates at a discount. The
ESPP allows participants to purchase our common stock on semi-annual offering dates at 95% of the
fair market value of the shares on the purchase date. During the thirteen weeks ended October 31,
2010, and November 1, 2009, no shares were purchased through the ESPP. During the thirty-nine weeks
ended October 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009, 0.1 million shares were purchased through the ESPP.
NOTE 9 FOREIGN CURRENCY
Foreign currency translation adjustments were the only component of accumulated other
comprehensive income and are reported separately in stockholders equity in the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The income tax expense (benefit) related to the foreign currency
translation adjustments was $248 thousand and $(80) thousand for the thirteen weeks ended October
31, 2010, and November 1, 2009, respectively, and $1.2 million and $3.0 million for the thirty-nine
weeks ended October 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009, respectively. The transaction (loss) gain
included in net income was $(9) thousand and $262 thousand for the thirteen weeks ended October 31,
2010, and November 1, 2009, respectively, and $(0.7) million and $(1.2) million for the thirty-nine
weeks ended October 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009, respectively.
10
Table of Contents
The impact of foreign currency translation adjustments to the carrying value of goodwill was
$0.2 million and $(0.1) million for the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, and November 1,
2009, respectively, and $1.4 million and $3.2 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31,
2010, and November 1, 2009, respectively.
NOTE 10 SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF CASH FLOWS
Supplemental cash flow information was as follows (in thousands):
Thirty-nine Weeks Ended | ||||||||
October 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | |||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 44,177 | $ | 44,539 | ||||
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
121,814 | 60,128 | ||||||
Assets acquired using capital lease obligations |
37,331 | 18,274 | ||||||
Accruals and accounts payable for capital expenditures |
28,359 | 14,081 | ||||||
Dividends declared but unpaid |
14,695 | 12,358 |
NOTE 11 LETTERS OF CREDIT
We have a $350.0 million revolving credit facility, or Revolving Credit Facility, that
expires on August 15, 2012. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are subject to a
borrowing base and bear interest, at our option, at the banks prime rate plus 0% to 0.25% or LIBOR
plus 0.875% to 1.25%. We are subject to fees payable to lenders each quarter at an annual rate of
0.20% of the unused amount of the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility also
gives us the ability to issue letters of credit, which reduce the amount available under the
Revolving Credit Facility. Letter of credit issuances under the Revolving Credit Facility are
subject to interest payable to the lenders and bear interest of 0.875% to 1.25% for stand-by
letters of credit or 0.438% to 0.625% for commercial letters of credit.
We had no borrowings and $31.6 million in stand-by letter of credit issuances outstanding
under our $350.0 million Revolving Credit Facility as of October 31, 2010. As of January 31, 2010,
we had no borrowings and $35.7 million in stand-by letter of credit issuances outstanding, and as
of November 1, 2009, we had no borrowings and $32.4 million in stand-by letter of credit issuances
outstanding.
We also have a $100.0 million stand-alone letter of credit facility, or Stand-alone Letter of
Credit Facility, that expires August 15, 2012. We are subject to fees payable to the
lender each quarter at an annual rate of 0.45% of the average daily face amount of the letters of
credit outstanding during the preceding calendar quarter. In addition, we are required to maintain
a cash deposit with the lender equal to the amount of outstanding letters of credit or we may use
other approved investments as collateral. If we use other approved investments as collateral, we
must have an amount on deposit which, when multiplied by the advance rate of 85%, is equal to the
amount of the outstanding letters of credit under the Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility. As of
October 31, 2010, we had $46.5 million in outstanding letters of credit under the Stand-alone
Letter of Credit Facility and $46.5 million in restricted cash on deposit with the lender. As of
January 31, 2010, we had $48.2 million in outstanding letters of credit under the Stand-alone
Letter of Credit Facility and $48.2 million in restricted cash on deposit with the lender. As of
November 1, 2009, we had $55.3 million in outstanding letters of credit under the Stand-alone
Letter of Credit Facility and $55.3 million in restricted cash on deposit with the lender.
The Revolving Credit Facility and Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility permit the payment of
dividends if we are not in default and the payment of dividends would not result in default of the
Revolving Credit Facility and Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility. As of October 31, 2010, we
were in compliance with the terms and covenants of our Revolving Credit Facility and Stand-alone
Letter of Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility and Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility
are secured by substantially all our personal property assets, our subsidiaries and certain real
property.
NOTE 12 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Advertising Purchase Commitments
As of October 31, 2010, we had obligations to purchase $8.7 million of advertising through the
remainder of 2010, and $14.2 million in 2011.
Product Purchase Commitments
As of October 31, 2010, we had various commitments to purchase product from certain vendors
that are not material to our total inventory purchases.
11
Table of Contents
Litigation and Settlements
Beginning in March 2007, we were named as a party in the following lawsuits arising from pet
food recalls announced by several manufacturers. The plaintiffs sued the major pet food
manufacturers and retailers claiming that their pets suffered injury and/or death as a result of
consuming allegedly contaminated pet food and pet snack products.
Bruski v. Nutro Products, et al., USDC, N.D. IL (filed 3/23/07)
Rozman v. Menu Foods, et al., USDC, MN (filed 4/9/07)
Ford v. Menu Foods, et al., USDC, S.D. CA (filed 4/23/07)
Wahl, et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., et al., USDC, C.D. CA (filed 4/10/07)
Demith v. Nestle, et al., USDC, N.D. IL (filed 4/23/07)
Thompkins v. Menu Foods, et al., USDC, CO (filed 4/11/07)
McBain v. Menu Foods, et al., Judicial Centre of Regina, Canada (filed 7/11/07)
Dayman v. Hills Pet Nutrition Inc., et al., Ontario Superior Court of Justice (filed 8/8/07)
Esau v. Menu Foods, et al., Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (filed 9/5/07)
Ewasew v. Menu Foods, et al., Supreme Court of British Columbia (filed 3/23/07)
Silva v. Menu Foods, et al., Canada Province of Manitoba (filed 3/30/07)
Powell v. Menu Foods, et al., Ontario Superior Court of Justice (filed 3/28/07)
Rozman v. Menu Foods, et al., USDC, MN (filed 4/9/07)
Ford v. Menu Foods, et al., USDC, S.D. CA (filed 4/23/07)
Wahl, et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., et al., USDC, C.D. CA (filed 4/10/07)
Demith v. Nestle, et al., USDC, N.D. IL (filed 4/23/07)
Thompkins v. Menu Foods, et al., USDC, CO (filed 4/11/07)
McBain v. Menu Foods, et al., Judicial Centre of Regina, Canada (filed 7/11/07)
Dayman v. Hills Pet Nutrition Inc., et al., Ontario Superior Court of Justice (filed 8/8/07)
Esau v. Menu Foods, et al., Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (filed 9/5/07)
Ewasew v. Menu Foods, et al., Supreme Court of British Columbia (filed 3/23/07)
Silva v. Menu Foods, et al., Canada Province of Manitoba (filed 3/30/07)
Powell v. Menu Foods, et al., Ontario Superior Court of Justice (filed 3/28/07)
By order dated June 28, 2007, the Bruski, Rozman, Ford, Wahl, Demith and Thompkins cases were
transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey and consolidated with other
pet food class actions under the federal rules for multi-district litigation (In re: Pet Food
Product Liability Litigation, Civil No. 07-2867). The Canadian cases were not consolidated.
On May 21, 2008, the parties to the U.S. lawsuits comprising the In re: Pet Food Product
Liability Litigation and the Canadian cases jointly submitted a comprehensive settlement
arrangement for court approval. Preliminary court approval was received from the U.S. District
Court on May 3, 2008, and from all of the Canadian courts as of July 8, 2008. On October 14, 2008,
the U.S. District Court approved the settlement, and the Canadian courts gave final approval on
November 3, 2008.
Two different groups of objectors filed notices of appeal with respect to the U.S. District
Courts approval of the U.S. settlement. Upon expiration of the prescribed appeal process these
cases should be resolved, and we continue to believe they will not have a material adverse impact
on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
There have been no appeals filed in Canada.
We are involved in the defense of various other legal proceedings that we do not believe are
material to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
12
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Except for historical information, the following discussion contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. In the normal course of business, our financial
position is routinely subjected to a variety of risks, including market risks associated with store
expansion, investments in information systems, international expansion, vendor reliability,
competitive forces and government regulatory actions. Our actual results could differ materially
from projected results due to some or all of the factors discussed below. You should carefully
consider the risks and uncertainties described below:
| A decline in consumer spending or a change in consumer preferences could reduce our sales or profitability and harm our business. | ||
| The pet products and services retail industry is very competitive and continued competitive forces may adversely impact our business and financial results. | ||
| Comparable store sales growth may decrease as stores grow older. If we are unable to increase sales at our existing stores, our results of operations could be harmed. | ||
| We may be unable to continue to open new stores and enter new markets successfully. If we are unable to successfully reformat existing stores and open new stores, our results of operations could be harmed. Also, store development may place increasing demands on management and operating systems and may erode sales at existing stores. | ||
| Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate due to seasonal changes associated with the pet products and services retail industry and the timing of expenses, new store openings and store closures. | ||
| Failure to successfully manage and execute our marketing initiatives could have a negative impact on our business. | ||
| A disruption, malfunction or increased costs in the operation, expansion or replenishment of our distribution centers or our supply chain would impact our ability to deliver to our stores or increase our expenses, which could harm our sales and results of operations. | ||
| Failure to successfully manage our inventory could harm our business. | ||
| If our information systems fail to perform as designed or are interrupted for a significant period of time, our business could be harmed. | ||
| If we fail to protect the integrity and security of customer and associate information, we could be exposed to litigation and our business could be adversely impacted. | ||
| The disruption of the relationship with or the loss of any of our key vendors, a decision by our vendors to make their products available in supermarkets or through warehouse clubs and other mass and retail merchandisers, the inability of our vendors to provide quality products in a timely or cost-effective manner, or risks associated with the suppliers from whom products are sourced, could harm our business. | ||
| Our expanded offering of proprietary branded products may not improve our financial performance and may expose us to product liability claims. | ||
| Food safety, quality and health concerns could affect our business. | ||
| We depend on key executives, store managers and other personnel and may not be able to retain or replace these employees or recruit additional qualified personnel, which could harm our business. | ||
| Our international operations may result in additional market risks, which may harm our business. | ||
| Our business may be harmed if the operation of veterinary hospitals at our stores is limited or fails to continue. | ||
| We face various risks as an e-commerce retailer. |
13
Table of Contents
| Our business could be harmed if we were unable to effectively manage our cash flow and raise any needed additional capital on acceptable terms. | ||
| Failure to successfully integrate any business we acquire could have an adverse impact on our financial results. | ||
| Failure to protect our intellectual property could have a negative impact on our operating results. | ||
| A determination that we are in violation of any contractual obligations or government regulations could result in a disruption to our operations and could impact our financial results. | ||
| Failure of our internal controls over financial reporting could harm our business and financial results. | ||
| Changes in laws, accounting standards and subjective assumptions, estimates, and judgments by management related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial results. | ||
| An unfavorable determination by tax regulators may cause our provision for income and other taxes to be inadequate and may result in a material impact to our financial results. | ||
| Failure to obtain commercial insurance at acceptable prices or failure to adequately reserve for self-insured exposures might have a negative impact on our business. | ||
| Pending legislation, weather, catastrophic events, disease, or other factors, could disrupt our operations, supply chain and the supply of small pets and products we sell, which could harm our reputation and decrease sales. | ||
| Fluctuations in the stock market, as well as general economic and market conditions, may impact our operations, sales, financial results and market price of our common stock. | ||
| Continued volatility and disruption to the global capital and credit markets may adversely affect our ability to access credit and the financial soundness of our suppliers. | ||
| Our operating and financial performance in any given period may differ from the guidance we have provided to the public. | ||
| We have implemented some anti-takeover provisions that may prevent or delay an acquisition of us that may not be beneficial to our stockholders. |
For more information about these risks, see the discussion under the heading Risk Factors in
our Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 25, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference.
14
Table of Contents
Overview
Based on our 2009 net sales of $5.3 billion, we are North Americas leading specialty provider
of products, services and solutions for the lifetime needs of pets. As of October 31, 2010, we
operated 1,172 stores, and we anticipate opening 13 to 16 net new stores during the remainder of
2010. Our stores carry a broad assortment of high-quality pet supplies at everyday low prices. We
offer approximately 10,000 distinct items, including nationally recognized brand names, as well as
an extensive selection of proprietary brands across a range of product categories.
We complement our extensive product assortment with a wide selection of pet services,
including grooming, training, boarding and day camp. All our stores offer complete pet
training services, and virtually all our stores feature pet styling salons that provide
high-quality grooming services. Our PetsHotels provide boarding for dogs and cats, which includes
24-hour supervision, an on-call veterinarian, temperature controlled rooms and suites, daily
specialty treats and play time, as well as day camp for dogs. As of October 31, 2010, we operated
172 PetsHotels, and we anticipate opening 8 additional PetsHotels during the remainder of 2010.
We make full-service veterinary care available through our strategic relationship with certain
third-party operators. As of October 31, 2010, 765 of our stores included full service veterinary
hospitals. MMI Holdings, Inc., through a wholly owned subsidiary, Medical Management International,
Inc., collectively referred to as Banfield, operated 754 of the veterinary hospitals under the
registered trade name of Banfield, The Pet Hospital. The remaining 11 hospitals are operated by
other third parties in Canada.
The principal challenges we face as a business are the highly competitive market in which we
operate and the continued uncertainty in the macro-economy. However, we believe we have a
competitive advantage in our solutions for the Total Lifetime CareSM of pets,
including pet services and proprietary brands, which we believe cannot easily be duplicated.
Additionally, we believe that our operating cash flow and cash on hand will be adequate to meet our
operating, investing and financing needs in the foreseeable future and we continue to have access
to our Revolving Credit Facility. We expect to continuously assess the economic environment and
market conditions to guide our decisions regarding our uses of cash, including capital
expenditures, investments, dividends and share repurchases.
Executive Summary
| Diluted earnings per common share increased 22.6% to $0.38, on net income of $45.6 million, for the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, compared to diluted earnings per common share of $0.31 on net income of $38.1 million for the thirteen weeks ended November 1, 2009. Diluted earnings per common share were $1.25 and $0.98 for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009, respectively. | ||
| Net sales increased 7.2% to $1.4 billion for the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, compared to $1.3 billion for the thirteen weeks ended November 1, 2009. This increase included $8.9 million of other revenue from license fees, utilities and specific operating expenses charged to Banfield during the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010. Net sales increased 6.2% to $4.2 billion for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, compared to $3.9 billion for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 1, 2009. This increase included $25.7 million of other revenue from license fees, utilities and specific operating expenses charged to Banfield during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010. | ||
| Comparable store sales, or sales in stores open at least one year, increased 5.6% and 4.3% for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, respectively. | ||
| Services sales increased 8.5% to $148.3 million for the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, compared to $136.7 million for the thirteen weeks ended November 1, 2009. Services sales increased 7.6% to $466.9 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, compared to $433.7 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 1, 2009. | ||
| As of October 31, 2010, we had $281.9 million in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. We had no short-term debt, and did not borrow against the Revolving Credit Facility during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010. | ||
| We purchased 1.6 million and 5.0 million shares of our common stock for $56.3 million and $163.4 million during the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, respectively. | ||
| During the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, we added 8 and 23 net new stores, respectively. |
15
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We discuss our critical accounting policies and estimates in Item 7, Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended January 31, 2010. We have made no significant changes to our critical accounting
policies since January 31, 2010.
Results of Operations
The following table presents the percent of net sales of certain items included in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income:
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | October 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Total cost of sales |
72.0 | 72.5 | 71.5 | 71.9 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
28.0 | 27.5 | 28.5 | 28.1 | ||||||||||||
Operating, general and administrative expenses |
22.0 | 22.0 | 21.8 | 22.1 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
6.0 | 5.5 | 6.7 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(1.0 | ) | (1.2 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (1.1 | ) | ||||||||
Income before income tax expense and equity
in income from investee |
5.0 | 4.3 | 5.6 | 4.8 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(1.9 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (2.2 | ) | (1.8 | ) | ||||||||
Equity in income from investee |
0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
3.3 | % | 2.9 | % | 3.6 | % | 3.1 | % | ||||||||
Thirteen Weeks Ended October 31, 2010, Compared to the Thirteen Weeks Ended November 1, 2009
Net Sales
Net sales increased $0.1 billion, or 7.2%, to $1.4 billion for the thirteen weeks ended
October 31, 2010, compared to $1.3 billion for the thirteen weeks ended November 1, 2009. The
increase in net sales was partially impacted by $3.1 million in favorable foreign currency
fluctuations. Approximately 15% of the sales increase is due to the addition of 23 net new stores
and 11 new PetsHotels since November 1, 2009, 75% of the sales increase is due to a 5.6% increase
in comparable store sales for the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, and the remaining 10% of
the sales increase is due to other revenue from reimbursements charged to Banfield. The increase in
comparable store sales was due to the impact of merchandising and pricing strategies, as well as
new product offerings. Comparable store transactions, which we use as a proxy for traffic,
represented 3.6% of the comparable store sales growth in the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010,
compared to (0.9)% in the thirteen weeks ended November 1, 2009. An increase in the average sales
per transaction represented 2.0% of the comparable store sales growth in the thirteen weeks ended
October 31, 2010, compared to 1.2% in the thirteen weeks ended November 1, 2009.
Services sales increased 8.5%, or $11.6 million, to $148.3 million for the thirteen weeks
ended October 31, 2010, compared to $136.7 million for the thirteen weeks ended November 1, 2009.
The increase in services sales is primarily due to continued strong demand for our grooming
services, and the addition of 23 net new stores and 11 new PetsHotels since November 1, 2009.
Other revenue included in net sales during the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010,
represents license fees and reimbursements for specific operating expenses charged to Banfield
under the master operating agreement, which comprised 0.6% of net sales, or $8.9 million. See the
Related Party Transactions discussion for further information.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased 50 basis points to 28.0% of net sales for the thirteen weeks ended
October 31, 2010, from 27.5% for the thirteen weeks ended November 1, 2009.
Overall merchandise margin increased 25 basis points. We experienced rate improvement within
the merchandise categories that was partially offset by the continuation of high volume flea and
tick sales. The flea and tick margin, net of shrink, was slightly higher than our average
consumables margin, but significantly less than our average merchandise margin. Consumables
merchandise sales, which includes pet food, treats and litter, typically generate a lower gross
product margin as compared to hardgoods merchandise. Hardgoods
16
Table of Contents
merchandise includes pet supplies such as collars, leashes, health care supplies, grooming and
beauty aids, toys and apparel, as well as pet beds and carriers.
The services contribution to gross margin was flat. Store occupancy and warehouse and
distribution costs included in gross margin provided benefits of 30 basis points and 15 basis
points, respectively, due to leveraging associated with the increase in net sales for the thirteen
weeks ended October 31, 2010.
Recognizing reimbursements from Banfield as other revenue negatively impacted gross margin by
approximately 20 basis points.
Operating, General and Administrative Expenses
Operating, general and administrative expenses remained flat as a percentage of net sales for
the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, compared to the thirteen weeks ended November 1, 2009.
For the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, operating, general and administrative expenses
were $305.3 million compared to $284.9 million for the thirteen weeks ended November 1, 2009. The
primary reasons for the year over year increase include increases in costs for incentive
compensation associated with better than expected financial results, higher bank fees associated
with increases in debit card rates and higher claims expense for health insurance.
Interest Expense, net
Interest expense, which is primarily related to capital lease obligations, was $14.5 million
during the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, compared to $15.1 million for the thirteen weeks
ended November 1, 2009. Included in interest expense, net was interest income of $0.2 million for
the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, compared to $0.1 million for the thirteen weeks ended
November 1, 2009.
Income Tax Expense
For the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, income tax expense was $26.4 million, an
effective tax rate of 38.0%, compared with $20.5 million for the thirteen weeks ended November 1,
2009, an effective tax rate of 36.4%. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily due to
fluctuations in liabilities accrued for uncertain tax positions. The effective tax rate is
calculated by dividing our income tax expense, which includes the income tax expense related to our
equity in income from investee, by income before income tax expense and equity in income from
investee.
Equity in Income from Investee
Our equity in income from our investment in Banfield was $2.6 million and $2.3 million for the
thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009, respectively, based on our ownership
percentage in Banfield.
Thirty-nine Weeks Ended October 31, 2010, Compared to the Thirty-nine Weeks Ended November 1, 2009
Net Sales
Net sales increased $0.24 billion, or 6.2%, to $4.17 billion for the thirty-nine weeks ended
October 31, 2010, compared to $3.93 billion for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 1, 2009. The
increase in net sales was partially impacted by $20.6 million in favorable foreign currency
fluctuations. Approximately 20% of the sales increase is due to the addition of 23 net new stores
and 11 new PetsHotels since November 1, 2009, 70% of the sales increase is due to a 4.3% increase
in comparable store sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010 and the remaining 10% of
the sales increase is due to other revenue from reimbursements charged to Banfield. The increase in
comparable store sales was due to the impact of merchandising strategies, pricing strategies and
new product offerings. Comparable store transactions, which we use as a proxy for traffic,
represented 1.3% of the comparable store sales growth in the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31,
2010, compared to (0.5)% in the thirty-nine weeks ended November 1, 2009. An increase in the
average sales per transaction represented 3.0% of the comparable store sales growth in the
thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, compared to 2.1% in the thirty-nine weeks ended November
1, 2009.
Services sales increased 7.6%, or $33.2 million, to $466.9 million for the thirty-nine weeks
ended October 31, 2010, compared to $433.7 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 1,
2009. The increase in services sales is primarily due to continued strong demand for our grooming
services and the addition of 23 net new stores and 11 new PetsHotels since November 1, 2009.
17
Table of Contents
Other revenue included in net sales during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010,
represents license fees and reimbursements for specific operating expenses charged to Banfield
under the master operating agreement, which comprised 0.6% of net sales, or $25.7 million. See the
Related Party Transactions discussion for further information.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased 40 basis points to 28.5% of net sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended
October 31, 2010, from 28.1% for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 1, 2009.
Merchandise margin increased 10 basis points as we anniversary various price reductions,
hardgoods promotions and broad category promotions to drive additional customer traffic during the
thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010. Our hardgoods sales outpaced the sales growth of our
consumables category during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, primarily due to the
addition of the flea and tick product line The flea and tick margin, net of shrink, was slightly
higher than our average consumables margin, but significantly less than our average merchandise
margin. The planned resets of the rawhide and live goods areas of the stores further pressured the
merchandise margin.
Services negatively contributed to gross margin by 10 basis points. Store occupancy costs
included in gross margin provided 40 basis points of improvement due to leveraging associated with
the increase in net sales, favorable lease negotiations and lower utility costs. Warehouse and
distribution costs included in gross margin provided a benefit of 20 basis points due to leveraging
associated with the increase in net sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010.
Recognizing reimbursements from Banfield as other revenue negatively impacted gross margin by
approximately 20 basis points.
Operating, General and Administrative Expenses
Operating, general and administrative expenses decreased to 21.8% of net sales for the
thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, from 22.1% for the thirty-nine weeks ended November 1,
2009.
During the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, lower store related expenses as a
percentage of net sales provided 25 basis points of benefit. Operating, general and administrative
expenses increased on a dollar basis by $42.8 million. The primary reasons for the year over year
increase include increases in costs for incentive compensation associated with better than expected
financial results, higher bank fees associated with increases in debit card rates and higher claims
expense for health insurance.
Interest Expense, net
Interest expense, which is primarily related to capital lease obligations, was $44.7 million
during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, compared to $45.5 million for the thirty-nine
weeks ended November 1, 2009. Included in interest expense, net was interest income of $0.5 million
for both the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009.
Income Tax Expense
For the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, income tax expense was $91.3 million, an
effective tax rate of 38.9%, compared with $71.6 million the thirty-nine weeks ended November 1,
2009, an effective tax rate of 37.7%. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily due to
fluctuations in liabilities accrued for uncertain tax positions and increases to certain state tax
liabilities. The effective tax rate is calculated by dividing our income tax expense, which
includes the income tax expense related to our equity in income from investee, by income before
income tax expense and equity in income from investee.
Equity in Income from Investee
Our equity in income from our investment in Banfield was $6.2 million and $4.9 million for the
thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009, respectively, based on our
ownership percentage in Banfield.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
18
Table of Contents
We believe that our operating cash flow and cash on hand will be adequate to meet our
operating, investing and financing needs in the foreseeable future. In addition, we also have
access to our $350.0 million revolving credit facility, although there can be no assurance of our
ability to access these markets on commercially acceptable terms in the future. We expect to
continuously assess the economic environment and market conditions to guide our decisions regarding
our uses of cash, including capital expenditures, investments, dividends and the purchase of
treasury stock.
We finance our operations, new store and PetsHotel growth, store remodels and other
expenditures to support our growth initiatives primarily through cash generated by operating
activities. Receipts from our sales come from cash, checks and third-party debit and credit cards,
and therefore provide a significant source of liquidity. Cash is used in operating activities
primarily to fund procurement of merchandise inventories and other assets, net of accounts payable
and other accrued liabilities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $213.1 million for
the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, compared to $343.4 million for the thirty-nine weeks
ended November 1, 2009. The primary differences between the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31,
2010, and November 1, 2009, were increased purchases of merchandise inventories and income tax
payments.
Cash used in investing activities consisted primarily of expenditures associated with opening
new stores, reformatting existing stores, expenditures associated with equipment and computer
software in support of our system initiatives, PetsHotel construction costs, and other expenditures
to support our growth plans and initiatives. Net cash used in investing activities was $87.0
million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, compared to $138.3 million for the
thirty-nine weeks ended November 1, 2009. The primary differences between the thirty-nine weeks
ended October 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009, resulted from an increase in restricted cash during
the thirty-nine weeks ended November 1, 2009.
Net cash used in financing activities was $200.2 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended
October 31, 2010, and consisted primarily of the cash paid for treasury stock, payments on capital
lease obligations, and payments of cash dividends, offset by net proceeds from common stock issued
under equity incentive plans, and an increase in our bank overdraft and proceeds from tax
deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized. Net cash used in financing activities for
the thirty-nine weeks ended November 1, 2009, was $147.5 million. The primary differences between
the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009, were an increase in cash paid
for treasury stock offset by an increase in our bank overdraft.
Operating Capital and Capital Expenditure Requirements
Substantially all our stores are leased facilities. We opened 29 new stores and closed 6
stores in the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010. Generally, each new store requires capital
expenditures of approximately $0.9 million for fixtures, equipment and leasehold improvements,
approximately $0.3 million for inventory and approximately $0.1 million for preopening costs. We
expect total capital spending to be $125 million to $135 million for 2010, based on our plan to
open 36 to 39 new stores and 18 new PetsHotels, to invest in the development of our information
systems, to add to our services capacity with the expansion of certain grooming salons, to remodel
or replace certain store assets and to continue our store refresh program.
Our ability to fund our operations and make planned capital expenditures depends on our future
operating performance and cash flow, which are subject to prevailing economic conditions and to
financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.
The following table presents our capital expenditures (in thousands):
Thirty-nine Weeks Ended | ||||||||
October 31, 2010 | November 1, 2009 | |||||||
Capital Expenditures: |
||||||||
New stores |
$ | 27,112 | $ | 22,345 | ||||
Store-related projects(1) |
38,369 | 38,201 | ||||||
PetsHotel(2) |
6,876 | 4,982 | ||||||
Information technology |
12,808 | 12,471 | ||||||
Supply chain |
3,423 | 8,403 | ||||||
Other |
223 | 555 | ||||||
Total capital expenditures |
$ | 88,811 | $ | 86,957 | ||||
(1) | Includes store remodels, grooming salon expansion, equipment replacement, relocations, and various merchandising projects. |
(2) | For new and existing stores. |
19
Table of Contents
Commitments and Contingencies
As of October 31, 2010, we had obligations to purchase $8.7 million of advertising through the
remainder of 2010, and $14.2 million in 2011.
As of October 31, 2010, we had various commitments to purchase product from certain vendors
that are not material to our total inventory purchases.
Other than in connection with executing operating leases, we do not have any off-balance sheet
financing that has, or is reasonably likely to have, a material, current or future effect on our
financial condition, cash flows, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital
resources.
We have not had any other material changes in our contractual obligations since January 31,
2010. Information regarding our contractual obligations is provided in Item 7, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010.
Credit Facilities
We have a $350.0 million revolving credit facility, or Revolving Credit Facility, that
expires on August 15, 2012. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are subject to a
borrowing base and bear interest, at our option, at the banks prime rate plus 0% to 0.25% or LIBOR
plus 0.875% to 1.25%. We are subject to fees payable to lenders each quarter at an annual rate of
0.20% of the unused amount of the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility also
gives us the ability to issue letters of credit, which reduce the amount available under the
Revolving Credit Facility. Letter of credit issuances under the Revolving Credit Facility are
subject to interest payable to the lenders and bear interest of 0.875% to 1.25% for stand-by
letters of credit or 0.438% to 0.625% for commercial letters of credit.
We had no borrowings and $31.6 million in stand-by letter of credit issuances outstanding
under our $350.0 million Revolving Credit Facility as of October 31, 2010. As of January 31, 2010,
we had no borrowings and $35.7 million in stand-by letter of credit issuances outstanding, and as
of November 1, 2009, we had no borrowings and $32.4 million in stand-by letter of credit issuances
outstanding.
We also have a $100.0 million stand-alone letter of credit facility, or Stand-alone Letter of
Credit Facility, that expires August 15, 2012. We are subject to fees payable to the
lender each quarter at an annual rate of 0.45% of the average daily face amount of the letters of
credit outstanding during the preceding calendar quarter. In addition, we are required to maintain
a cash deposit with the lender equal to the amount of outstanding letters of credit or we may use
other approved investments as collateral. If we use other approved investments as collateral, we
must have an amount on deposit which, when multiplied by the advance rate of 85%, is equal to the
amount of the outstanding letters of credit under the Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility. As of
October 31, 2010, we had $46.5 million in outstanding letters of credit under the Stand-alone
Letter of Credit Facility and $46.5 million in restricted cash on deposit with the lender. As of
January 31, 2010, we had $48.2 million in outstanding letters of credit under the Stand-alone
Letter of Credit Facility and $48.2 million in restricted cash on deposit with the lender. As of
November 1, 2009, we had $55.3 million in outstanding letters of credit under the Stand-alone
Letter of Credit Facility and $55.3 million in restricted cash on deposit with the lender.
The Revolving Credit Facility and Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility permit the payment of
dividends if we are not in default and the payment of dividends would not result in default of the
Revolving Credit Facility and Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility. As of October 31, 2010, we
were in compliance with the terms and covenants of our Revolving Credit Facility and Stand-alone
Letter of Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility and Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility
are secured by substantially all our personal property assets, our subsidiaries and certain real
property.
Dividends
We believe our ability to generate cash allows us to invest in the growth of our business and,
at the same time, distribute a quarterly dividend.
20
Table of Contents
During the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, the Board of Directors declared the
following dividends:
Date | Dividend Amount | Stockholders of | Date | |||||||||
Declared | per Share | Record Date | Paid | |||||||||
March 23, 2010 |
$ | 0.100 | April 30, 2010 | May 14, 2010 | ||||||||
June 16, 2010 |
$ | 0.125 | July 30, 2010 | August 13, 2010 | ||||||||
September 29, 2010 |
$ | 0.125 | October 29, 2010 | November 12, 2010 |
Share Purchase Program
In June 2009, the Board of Directors approved a share purchase program authorizing the
purchase of up to $350.0 million of our common stock through January 29, 2012. During the thirteen
weeks ended May 2, 2010, we purchased 3.4 million shares of common stock for $107.1 million under
the June 2009 share purchase program.
In June 2010, the Board of Directors approved a new share purchase program authorizing the
purchase of up to $400.0 million of our common stock through January 29, 2012, which replaced the
$350.0 million program. During the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, we purchased 1.6 shares
of common stock for $56.3 million under the June 2010 share purchase program. As of October 31,
2010, $343.7 million remained available under the $400.0 million program.
Related Party Transactions
We have an investment in Banfield, who through a wholly owned subsidiary, Medical Management
International, Inc., operates full-service veterinary hospitals in 754 of our stores. We use the
equity method of accounting for our investment in Banfield. Our investment consists of common and
preferred stock. As of October 31, 2010, we owned 21.4% of the voting stock and 21.0% of the
combined voting and non-voting stock of Banfield.
Our equity in income from our investment in Banfield, which is recorded one month in arrears
under the equity method of accounting, was $2.6 million and $2.3 million for the thirteen weeks
ended October 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009, respectively, and $6.2 million and $4.9 million for
the thirty-nine weeks ended October 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009, respectively.
In accordance with our master operating agreement with Banfield, we charge Banfield license
fees for the space used by the veterinary hospitals and for their portion of utilities costs. We
also charge Banfield for its portion of specific operating expenses. Prior to February 1, 2010,
license fees were treated as a reduction of occupancy costs, which are included as a component of
cost of merchandise sales, and reimbursements for specific operating expenses were treated as a
reduction of operating, general and administrative expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statement
of Operations and Comprehensive Income. Beginning February 1, 2010, license fees and the
reimbursements for specific operating expenses are included in other revenue, and the related costs
are included in cost of other revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Other
Comprehensive Income.
We recognized license fees and reimbursements for specific operating expenses from Banfield of
$8.9 million and $8.5 million during the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, and November 1,
2009, respectively, and $25.7 million and $25.2 million during the thirty-nine weeks ended October
31, 2010, and November 1, 2009, respectively. Receivables from Banfield totaled $2.9 million, $2.4
million, and $3.4 million at October 31, 2010, January 31, 2010, and November 1, 2009,
respectively, and were included in receivables, net in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The master operating agreement also includes a provision for the sharing of profits on the
sale of therapeutic pet foods sold in all stores with an operating Banfield hospital. The net sales
and gross profit on the sale of therapeutic pet food sales are not material to our condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Seasonality and Inflation
Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. We typically realize a higher portion of our
net sales and operating profits during the fourth quarter due to increased holiday traffic. As a
result of this seasonality, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results
are not necessarily meaningful and that these comparisons cannot be relied upon as indicators of
future performance. Controllable expenses could fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter in a year. Since
our stores typically draw customers from a large trade area, sales also may be impacted by adverse
weather or travel conditions, which are more prevalent during certain seasons of the year. As a
result of our expansion plans, the timing of new store and PetsHotel openings and related
preopening costs, the amount of revenue contributed by new and existing stores and PetsHotels and
the timing and estimated obligations of store closures, our quarterly results of operations may
fluctuate. Finally, because new stores tend to experience higher payroll, advertising and other
store level expenses as a percentage of sales than mature stores, new store openings will also
contribute to lower store operating margins until these stores become established. We expense
preopening costs associated with each new location as the costs are incurred.
21
Table of Contents
While we have experienced inflationary pressure in recent years, we have been able to largely
mitigate the effect by increasing retail prices accordingly. Although neither inflation nor
deflation has had a material impact on net operating results, we can make no assurance that our
business will not be affected by inflation or deflation in the future.
Impact of Federal Health Care Reform Legislation
In March 2010, the President of the United States signed into law the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or
the Acts. The provisions of the Acts are not expected to have a significant impact to our
condensed consolidated financial statements in the short term. The longer term potential impacts
of the Acts to our business and the condensed consolidated financial statements are currently
uncertain. We will continue to assess how the Acts apply to us and how to best have our healthcare
plans meet the stated requirements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks
As of October 31, 2010, there have been no material changes in any of the market risk
information disclosed by us in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2010.
More detailed information concerning market risk can be found in Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
January 31, 2010.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of October 31, 2010. The
term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures
of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in
the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and
forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it
files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the companys
management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
No changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010, that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
October 31, 2010, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of
such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level
and designed to meet the objective at the reasonable assurance level.
22
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Beginning in March 2007, we were named as a party in the following lawsuits arising from pet
food recalls announced by several manufacturers. The plaintiffs sued the major pet food
manufacturers and retailers claiming that their pets suffered injury and/or death as a result of
consuming allegedly contaminated pet food and pet snack products.
Bruski v. Nutro Products, et al., USDC, N.D. IL (filed 3/23/07)
Rozman v. Menu Foods, et al., USDC, MN (filed 4/9/07)
Ford v. Menu Foods, et al., USDC, S.D. CA (filed 4/23/07)
Wahl, et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., et al., USDC, C.D. CA (filed 4/10/07)
Demith v. Nestle, et al., USDC, N.D. IL (filed 4/23/07)
Thompkins v. Menu Foods, et al., USDC, CO (filed 4/11/07)
McBain v. Menu Foods, et al., Judicial Centre of Regina, Canada (filed 7/11/07)
Dayman v. Hills Pet Nutrition Inc., et al., Ontario Superior Court of Justice (filed 8/8/07)
Esau v. Menu Foods, et al., Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (filed 9/5/07)
Ewasew v. Menu Foods, et al., Supreme Court of British Columbia (filed 3/23/07)
Silva v. Menu Foods, et al., Canada Province of Manitoba (filed 3/30/07)
Powell v. Menu Foods, et al., Ontario Superior Court of Justice (filed 3/28/07)
Rozman v. Menu Foods, et al., USDC, MN (filed 4/9/07)
Ford v. Menu Foods, et al., USDC, S.D. CA (filed 4/23/07)
Wahl, et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., et al., USDC, C.D. CA (filed 4/10/07)
Demith v. Nestle, et al., USDC, N.D. IL (filed 4/23/07)
Thompkins v. Menu Foods, et al., USDC, CO (filed 4/11/07)
McBain v. Menu Foods, et al., Judicial Centre of Regina, Canada (filed 7/11/07)
Dayman v. Hills Pet Nutrition Inc., et al., Ontario Superior Court of Justice (filed 8/8/07)
Esau v. Menu Foods, et al., Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (filed 9/5/07)
Ewasew v. Menu Foods, et al., Supreme Court of British Columbia (filed 3/23/07)
Silva v. Menu Foods, et al., Canada Province of Manitoba (filed 3/30/07)
Powell v. Menu Foods, et al., Ontario Superior Court of Justice (filed 3/28/07)
By order dated June 28, 2007, the Bruski, Rozman, Ford, Wahl, Demith and Thompkins cases were
transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey and consolidated with other
pet food class actions under the federal rules for multi-district litigation (In re: Pet Food
Product Liability Litigation, Civil No. 07-2867). The Canadian cases were not consolidated.
On May 21, 2008, the parties to the U.S. lawsuits comprising the In re: Pet Food Product
Liability Litigation and the Canadian cases jointly submitted a comprehensive settlement
arrangement for court approval. Preliminary court approval was received from the U.S. District
Court on May 3, 2008, and from all of the Canadian courts as of July 8, 2008. On October 14, 2008,
the U.S. District Court approved the settlement, and the Canadian courts gave final approval on
November 3, 2008.
Two different groups of objectors filed notices of appeal with respect to the U.S. District
Courts approval of the U.S. settlement. Upon expiration of the prescribed appeal process, these
cases should be resolved, and we continue to believe they will not have a material adverse impact
on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
There have been no appeals filed in Canada.
We are involved in the defense of various other legal proceedings that we do not believe are
material to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information in this report, you should carefully consider the factors
discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
January 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future
results.
23
Table of Contents
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table shows purchases of our common stock and the available funds to purchase
additional common stock for each period in the thirteen weeks ended October 31, 2010:
Total Number of | ||||||||||||||||
Total | Shares | Value That May | ||||||||||||||
Number | Purchased as Part of | Yet be Purchased | ||||||||||||||
of Shares | Average Price | Publicly Announced | Under the Plans or | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | Paid per Share | Plans or Programs | Programs(1) | ||||||||||||
August 2, 2010, to August 29, 2010 |
437,932 | $ | 32.74 | 437,932 | $ | 385,663,000 | ||||||||||
August 30, 2010, to October 3, 2010 |
| | | $ | 385,663,000 | |||||||||||
October 3, 2010, to October 31, 2010 |
1,175,889 | $ | 35.69 | 1,175,889 | $ | 343,701,000 | ||||||||||
Thirteen Weeks Ended October 31, 2010 |
1,613,821 | $ | 34.89 | 1,613,821 | $ | 343,701,000 |
(1) | In June 2010, the Board of Directors approved a share purchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $400.0 million of our common stock through January 29, 2012, which replaced the previously authorized $350.0 million program. |
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit 15.1
|
Awareness Letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding unaudited interim financial statements. | |
Exhibit 31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer as required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
Exhibit 31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer as required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
Exhibit 32.1*
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer as required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
Exhibit 32.2*
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer as required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
Exhibit 101.INS **
|
XBRL Instance | |
Exhibit 101.SCH **
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | |
Exhibit 101.CAL **
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation | |
Exhibit 101.LAB **
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels | |
Exhibit 101.PRE **
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation | |
Exhibit 101.DEF **
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition |
* | The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 and Exhibit 32.2 accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of PetSmart, Inc., under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. | |
** | In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in these exhibits is furnished and deemed not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections. |
24
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: November 24, 2010
/s/ Lawrence P. Molloy | ||||
Lawrence P. Molloy | ||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
||||
25