UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 333-145939

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		33-0754902 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
7386 Pershing Ave., University City, Missouri (Address of principal executive offices)		63130 (Zip Code)

(Registrant’s telephone number): (314) 802-8670

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of November 9, 2010, 68,309,679 shares of the Company’s common stock were outstanding.

 

 

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

		PAGE
PART I Financial Information			3
Item 1 Consolidated Financial Statements			3
Consolidated Balance Sheets — September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009			3
Consolidated Statements of Operations — Three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and Inception to September 30, 2010			4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) — September 30, 2010			5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and Inception to September 30, 2010			6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			8
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			18
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			26
Item 4T Controls and Procedures			26
PART II Other Information			27
Item 1 Legal Proceedings			27
Item 1A Risk Factors			27
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			27
Item 3 Defaults upon Senior Securities			28
Item 4 Reserved			28
Item 5 Other Information			28
Item 6 Exhibits			28
Signatures			29
Index to Exhibits			30
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.		Financial Statements

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.
(formerly Alternative Ethanol Technologies, Inc.)
(A Development Stage Company)

		September 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
		(unaudited)				(audited)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	1,566			$	912
Prepaids and other current assets			65,551				36,481
Total Current Assets			67,117				37,393
Property and equipment, net			11,026				20,308
Technology license, net			1,521,250				1,521,250
Patent			600,000				600,000
Total Assets		$	2,199,393			$	2,178,951
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	421,421			$	302,898
Accrued interest			90,842				83,142
Other accrued liabilities			442,344				175,693
Notes payable, net			1,785,382				1,401,925
Series A convertible debentures			—				140,000
Deferred revenue			50,000				50,000
Capital lease			2,459				4,869
Total Current Liabilities			2,792,448				2,158,527
Capital Lease			—				1,235
Total Liabilities			2,792,448				2,159,762
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 authorized shares; no shares issued or outstanding			—				—
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 240,000,000 authorized shares; 68,309,679 and 66,256,824 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively			68,310				66,257
Additional paid-in capital			6,291,513				5,911,136
Notes receivable — restricted common stock			(291,191	)			(316,838	)
Deficit accumulated during the development stage			(6,661,687	)			(5,641,366	)
Total Stockholders’ Equity			(593,055	)			19,189
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity		$	2,199,393			$	2,178,951

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.
(formerly Alternative Ethanol Technologies, Inc.)
(A Development Stage Company)

																		July 14, 2004
		Three months ended								Nine months ended								(inception) to
		September 30,								September 30,								September 30,
		2010				2009				2010				2009				2010
General and administrative expenses		$	155,019			$	288,740			$	591,770			$	877,567			$	2,747,409
Professional fees			32,988				64,657				107,458				257,231				1,156,922
Research and development			—				—				—				101				1,217,847
Operating Loss			188,007				353,397				699,228				1,134,899				5,122,178
Other expense (income):
Interest expense			101,302				253,657				325,446				725,949				1,478,439
Amortization of technology license			—				—				—				—				35,000
Deposit forfeiture			—				—				—				—				(25,000	)
Other expense (income)			4,377				(3,431	)			(4,353	)			(39,938	)			(83,278	)
			105,679				250,226				321,093				686,011				1,405,161
Net loss		$	293,686			$	603,623			$	1,020,321			$	1,820,910			$	6,527,339
Basic net loss per common share			**			$	0.01			$	0.02			$	0.03			$	0.13
Weighted average common shares outstanding			68,509,679				63,571,205				67,795,732				62,174,488				50,019,713

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.
(formerly Alternative Ethanol Technologies, Inc.)
(A Development Stage Company)

										Additional				Notes Rec -				July 14, 2004
		Common Stock								Paid-in				restricted				(inception) to
		Shares				Amount				Capital				common stock				Sept. 30, 2010
Balances at December 31, 2009			66,256,824			$	66,257			$	5,911,136			$	(316,838	)		$	(5,641,366	)
Discounts on Notes Payable											128,054
Issuance of restricted shares to a Director in Feb-10 at $.10 per share			150,000				150				14,850				(15,000	)
Conversion of Debentures in Apr-10 at $.08 per share			2,069,375				2,069				163,480
Conversion of Convertible Note in June-10 at $.08 per share			133,480				134				10,545
Interest on Notes Receivable															(12,949	)
Expiration of certain Notes Receivable in Aug-10 at $.15 per share			(300,000	)			(300	)			(44,700	)			53,596
Stock-based compensation											108,148
Net loss																			(1,020,321	)
Balances at September 30, 2010			68,309,679			$	68,310			$	6,291,513			$	(291,191	)		$	(6,661,687	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.
(formerly Alternative Ethanol Technologies, Inc.)
(A Development Stage Company)

										July 14, 2004
		Nine months ended								(inception) to
		September 30,								September 30,
		2010				2009				2010
Operating Activities
Net loss		$	(1,020,321	)		$	(1,820,910	)		$	(6,527,339	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
Items that did not use (provide) cash :
Common stock issued for organizational costs			—				—				100
Depreciation			9,282				13,017				57,330
Amortization			—				—				35,000
Interest income			(4,353	)			(7,938	)			(23,891	)
Amortization of discounts (interest expense) and other financing charges			236,681				661,211				1,191,157
Share-based compensation expense			108,148				318,740				727,990
Write-off of technology license			—				—				790,545
Fair value of RAM warrant settlement			—				—				125,027
Changes in operating assets and liabilities that provided (used) cash, net:
Prepaids and other current assets			(18,455	)			50,957				(33,177	)
Technology license			—				—				(132,500	)
Accounts payable			118,523				21,230				421,421
Other assets and other liabilities			88,156				91,726				277,756
Accrued liabilities			266,651				81,989				442,344
Net cash used by operating activities			(215,688	)			(589,978	)			(2,648,237	)
Cash Flows Provided (Used) by Investing Activities
Acquisition of patent, net			—				—				(150,000	)
Merger of Biomass North America Licensing, Inc., net			—				—				(20,000	)
Acquisition of HFTA technology, net			—				—				—
Expenditures for equipment			—				(20,702	)			(54,237	)
Net cash used by investing activities			—				(20,702	)			(224,237	)
Cash Flows Provided (Used) by Financing Activities
Advances — related parties			(10,615	)			—				(32,373	)
Payments on capital lease, including interest			(3,711	)			(3,788	)			(12,655	)
Series A Convertible Debentures, including interest			—				—				1,424,900
Issuance of Note Payable			100,000				—				100,000
Issuance of Convertible Notes Payable			350,000				627,499				1,915,500
Payments on Notes Payable			(219,332	)			(89,614	)			(546,332	)
Sale of common stock			—				—				25,000
Net cash provided by financing activities			216,342				534,097				2,874,040
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents			654				(76,583	)			1,566
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period			912				96,617				—
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	1,566			$	20,034			$	1,566

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.
(formerly Alternative Ethanol Technologies, Inc.)
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS cont’d (unaudited)

										July 14, 2004
		Nine months ended								(inception) to
		September 30,								September 30,
		2010				2009				2010
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest		$	675			$	2,925			$	10,921
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:
Promissory notes receivable related to Series A Convertible Debentures		$	—			$	—			$	450,000
Capital lease related to the purchase of equipment		$	—			$	—			$	14,119
Common stock issued for organizational costs		$	—			$	—			$	100
Common stock issued for promissory notes		$	—			$	—			$	133,596
Common stock issued for Convertible notes converted		$	10,678			$	36,655			$	182,770
Common stock issued for Debentures converted		$	165,550			$	—			$	1,498,887
Common stock and note payable issued for acquistion of Biomass		$	—			$	—			$	1,501,250
Common stock issued for HFTA		$	—			$	192,513			$	693,045

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

Note 1 — Organization and Business

Alternative Ethanol Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), was incorporated in Delaware on December 20, 1996. Effective August 2, 2007, the Company changed its name to CleanTech Biofuels, Inc.

On March 27, 2007, the Company acquired SRS Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“SRS Energy”), pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization. In accordance with the merger agreement, SRS Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, merged with and into SRS Energy. The merger was consummated on May 31, 2007 and resulted in SRS Energy becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. As a result of the merger, the stockholders of SRS Energy surrendered all of their issued and outstanding common stock and received shares of the Company’s common stock, $.001 par value per share (“Common Stock”). The former parent of SRS Energy, Supercritical Recovery Systems, Inc., immediately prior to the merger, distributed 78.8% of its 96% ownership in SRS Energy to its shareholders on a pro rata basis.

For accounting purposes, because the Company had been a public shell company prior to the merger, the merger was treated as an acquisition of the Company and a recapitalization of SRS Energy. As a result, the historical information of the Company prior to the merger is that of SRS Energy. In addition, historical share amounts have been restated to reflect the effect of the merger.

The Company is a development stage company that has been engaged in technology development and pre-operational activities since its formation. The Company is currently in the process of raising capital to design and build a commercial biomass recovery plant to provide biomass feedstock for customer evaluation and trial purchases. Initially, the biomass feedstock output will be sold or provided to electric utilities, power and steam producers, and biofuel and chemical research firms for evaluation. In addition to research and development, the Company is also working towards licensing and/or developing potential commercial projects. These projects plan to focus on cleaning and separating municipal solid waste (also referred to as MSW) into its component parts in order to obtain: (i) a homogenous feedstock of cellulosic biomass for producing energy and other chemical products and (ii) recyclable products (metals, plastics).

The Company has no operating history as a producer of biomass or energy sources and has not constructed any plants to date. We have no revenues and will be required to raise additional capital in order to execute our business plan and commercialize our products. Our current cash is not sufficient to fund our current operations. Our liabilities are substantially greater than our current available funds. Although we continue to seek additional financing through the sale of additional equity, various government funding opportunities and/or possibly through strategic alliances with larger energy or waste management companies, we have not had recent success securing meaningful amounts of financing. The Company will require substantial additional capital to implement its business plan and it may be unable to obtain the capital required to do so. If we are not able to immediately and successfully raise additional capital and/or achieve profitability or positive cash flow, we may not be able to continue operations.

The accompanying unaudited, consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Articles 8 and 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items considered necessary for a fair presentation, have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2010. For further information, refer to the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2010. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through November 9, 2010.

Note 2 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an amendment to the fair value measurement and disclosure standard improving disclosures about fair value measurements. The guidance requires additional disclosure for transfer activity pertaining to Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement activity for Level 3 fair value measurements. The guidance for the Level 1 and 2 disclosures was adopted on January 1, 2010 and did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements. The guidance for the activity in Level 3 disclosures is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company had no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 inputs during the quarter ended September 30, 2010.

Note 3 — Mergers/Acquisitions

On September 15, 2008, the Company consummated the acquisition of Biomass North America Licensing, Inc. (“Biomass”) pursuant to a merger between Biomass and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (with Biomass as the surviving subsidiary of the Company) in accordance with an Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between the Company and Biomass. By virtue of the merger, the Company acquired a license agreement pursuant to which the Company holds a license in the United States and Canada to use patented technology owned by Biomass North America, LLC, the former parent of Biomass (the “Licensor”), to clean and separate MSW (the “Biomass Recovery Process”). In July 2010, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued US patent number 7,745,208 for this process (the “BRP Patent”).

Upon consummation of the merger, the Company paid $20,000 in cash and issued a promissory note in the original principal amount of $80,000 bearing interest at an annual rate of 6% (the “Note”) to a shareholder of the Licensor. This note has been paid in full. Additionally, the Company issued to the four shareholders of the Licensor a total of 1,895,000 shares of Common Stock and deposited an additional 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock into an escrow account (collectively, the “Shares”). The Shares were issued as part of the merger consideration received by the shareholders of the Licensor. The escrowed shares will be released to the Licensor’s shareholders if and when the Company commences a commercial development that utilizes the Biomass Recovery Process. The Company recorded a long-term asset of $1.5 million which it will begin to amortize upon utilizing the license in our operations. If the escrowed shares are released based on the specified future events, an increase to the value of the asset will be recorded at that time. Based on the market value of Common Stock as of September 30, 2010, it would result in an increase of approximately $160,000 to the asset. Any future increase in the value of the asset would depend on the market value of our Common Stock at the time of utilization.

Note 4 — Patent

The Company owns US Patent No. 6,306,248 (the “PSC Patent”), which is the underlying technology upon which the BRP Patent is based. The Company acquired the PSC Patent on October 22, 2008 pursuant to a Patent Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) with World Waste Technologies, Inc. (“WWT”). As part of the acquisition of the PSC Patent, we also became the licensor of such technology to Bio-Products International, Inc. Upon signing the Agreement, the Company paid WWT $150,000, issued a note in the amount of $450,000 (interest at 6.0% per annum and secured by a security interest in the PSC Patent) and issued warrants to purchase 900,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.45 per share and to purchase an additional 900,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.45 per share contingent on payment of the note by July 22, 2009 (the original maturity date). WWT assigned all of its rights, title and interest in the note, warrants, security agreement and purchase agreement to Vertex Energy, Inc. (“Vertex”) as a result of a merger in March 2009. We entered into amendments dated July 23, 2009 whereby: (i) the Company paid 10% of the original note and all accrued interest to date, (ii) all previous warrants (totaling 1,800,000 shares) were reissued at a price of $0.11 per share with no contingencies and (iii) the remaining payments on the note were scheduled to be paid on October 22, 2009 (50% of principal plus accrued interest to date not yet paid) and January 22, 2010 (remaining principal and accrued interest to date). We entered into amendments dated October 22, 2009 whereby: (i) the October 22, 2009 payment was deferred until November 22, 2009 and (ii) we issued additional warrants to Vertex for 500,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.10 per share. The warrants are exercisable at any time for five years from the date of issuance or reissuance. The cost of the PSC Patent acquisition of $600,000 is recorded as a long-term asset on the Balance Sheet. The value of the warrants had been recorded as a contra-balance amount with the note and has been fully amortized through interest expense. The note had been recorded as short-term debt (notes payable) in the financial statements, net of the discount for the warrant feature. This note was paid in full in September 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, amortization of this discount of approximately $7,000 and $150,000, respectively, has been recorded in interest expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, amortization of this discount of $-0- and approximately $35,000, respectively, has been recorded in interest expense.

On September 1, 2010, the Company issued a promissory note to CMS Acquisition, LLC (“CMS”) in the amount of $100,000 and entered into a related Security Agreement. The Note matures on February 28, 2011, bears interest at 6.0% per annum and is secured by a security interest in the PSC Patent. In connection with the financing, the Company issued a warrant to CMS to purchase 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a price of $0.05 per share. The warrant is exercisable at any time for five years from the date of issuance.

Note 5 — Technology Licenses

Biomass North America Licensing, Inc.

We own a license in the United States and Canada to use the Biomass Recovery Process. See Note 3 — Mergers/Acquisitions. We recorded a long-term asset of $1.5 million for the value of this license when we acquired the license on September 15, 2008. Amortization of this asset will begin upon commencement of the use of the Biomass Recovery Process. The Company also deposited an additional 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock into an escrow account for the benefit of the Licensor. For accounting purposes, the shares remaining in escrow are not considered issued and outstanding as a project has not started using the Biomass Recovery Process. The shares are not deemed issued or vested until that time as described above.

The license requires that the Company pay a royalty in the amount of $1.00 per ton of bone-dry biomass produced using the Biomass Recovery Process. The license agreement is for a term of 21 years or the life of any patent issued for the Biomass Recovery Process. The Company has an exclusive license in the United States and Canada to use the Biomass Recovery Process, except that a principal owner of the Licensor has the right of first offer to manage and operate with respect to any development commenced using the licensed technology within 100 miles of the City of Chicago, Illinois. The license agreement further provides that the Company and the Licensor will work in good faith to complete a commercial development in the City of Chicago using the Biomass Recovery Process.

HFTA, Inc.

On March 20, 2008, the Company entered into a license agreement with HFTA, Inc. (“HFTA”) granting the Company the exclusive worldwide right to use the HFTA technology for the production of ethanol from MSW. The terms in the original agreement required us to pay an initial license fee of $25,000 to HFTA on execution of the agreement and a second license fee of $150,000 on September 1, 2009 if we were using the technology at that time. On August 24, 2009, we entered into an amendment with HFTA that moved the September 1, 2009 payment, plus interest at 6% per annum from the date of the amendment, to March 1, 2010.

Additionally, we deposited 2,887,687 shares of our Common Stock into an escrow account on May 12, 2008. The shares held in escrow were released to HFTA as follows: the first third of the shares (962,562 shares) were released from escrow on September 20, 2008 (six months from the date of the original agreement) and the remaining 1,925,125 shares were released upon the amendment in August 2009. As a result, the Company recorded an asset for the value of the first third share payment of approximately $500,000 in September 2008 and recorded an addition to the asset of approximately $190,000 related to the release of the remaining shares in August 2009. During the fourth quarter 2009, the Company decided not to use this technology going forward in our operations and thus wrote off the asset as of December 31, 2009. The impairment loss of approximately $690,000 is included in research and development expense on the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Bio-Products International, Inc.

On August 17, 2005, the Company entered into a license agreement with Bio-Products International, Inc. (“Bio-Products”) giving the Company limited exclusive rights to use the PSC Patent to process MSW and convert the cellulosic component of that waste to a homogenous feedstock to produce ethanol in the United States, subject to the right of Bio-Products to request five sites to construct MSW-to-ethanol plants in the United States. The Company’s license with Bio-Products was for a period of twenty years. Under the license, Bio-Products was to be paid a process royalty of $1.50 for every ton of waste received and processed at each facility to be constructed and operated under the agreement. The Company also was required to pay a by-product royalty of 2.5 percent of the gross sales price in excess of $10 per ton obtained from the sale of recyclable by-products, excluding the cellulosic biomass. Bio-Products would also have been paid a monthly fee for technical services to be provided by Bio-Products for each facility to be constructed and operated which initially would have been $10,000 per month and increase to $20,000 per month when vessels for processing waste are ordered for the facility. The $20,000 per month fee would have continued until construction of a facility was completed. The Company’s litigation involving Bio-Products was settled in March 2009 and as a result, this sublicense has been mutually terminated by all parties.

As disclosed in Note 4 — Patent, the Company acquired the PSC Patent. The Company is now the licensor to Bio-Products for the PSC Patent. Bio-Products (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Clean Earth Solutions, Inc., “CES”) is the exclusive licensee of the PSC Patent and has the right to sublicense the technology that is part of the PSC Patent to any party. Under the Master License Agreement, we are entitled to be paid 5% of any revenue derived by Bio-Products from the use of the technology and 40% of any sublicensing fees paid to Bio-Products for the use of the technology. The Master License Agreement is for a term of 20 years that commenced on August 18, 2003. On September 22, 2010, the Company sent a Notice of Breach to the licensee of our PSC Patent. We received a response from the licensee on November 5, 2010 and are currently working to resolve the issues raised by the Company and licensee.

All intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or other changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment charge is recognized if the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its implied fair value.

Note 6 — Debt

		September 30,				December 31,
		2010				2009
Convertible Notes Payable, net of discounts of $0 and $7,137 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, which are made up of various individual notes with an aggregate face value of $0 and $502,000 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, due in one year from date of note, interest at 6.0%		$	—			$	494,863
Convertible Notes Payable, net of discounts of $66,099 and $187,880 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, which are made up of various individual notes with an aggregate face value of $1,703,329 and $898,500 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, due in one year from date of note, interest at 6.0%			1,637,230				710,620
CMS Acquisition, LLC Note Payable, net of discount of $8,938 and $-0- at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, with a face value of $100,000 and $-0- at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, due on February 28, 2011, interest at 6.0%			91,062				—
Convertible Note Payable, net of discounts of $17,911 and $-0- at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, which is made up of an individual note with a face value of $75,000 and $-0- at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, due in one year from date of note, interest at 12.0%			57,089				—
Vertex (formerly WWT) Note Payable, net of discount of $-0- and $6,558 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, with a face value of $-0- and $203,000 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, interest at 6.0%.			—				196,442
Series A Convertible Debentures, converted April 16, 2010, interest at 6.0%			—				140,000
Total debt			1,785,381				1,541,925
Current maturities			(1,785,381	)			(1,541,925	)
Long-term portion, less current maturities		$	—			$	—

Convertible Notes Payable

During September 2008, the Company commenced an offering of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and a warrant. The Company raised a total of $642,000 of investment proceeds through March 31, 2009 and this offering is closed. As of March 31, 2010, all of these notes have either been converted to shares of our common stock or re-priced to our second convertible note offering (resulting in new notes with a total face value of $539,829, which included the original principal and interest through the date of re-pricing). Each convertible promissory note carried a one-year term and a 6% interest rate. In addition, each note could have been converted, at the note holder’s option, at any time during the one-year term into shares of Common Stock at $0.25 per share, or prior to the closing of any Qualifying Equity Financing (minimum capital received of $5 million). Each note was issued with a warrant to purchase additional shares of Common Stock equal to the principal amount of the promissory note at a price of $0.45 per share. These promissory notes had been recorded as short-term debt (notes payable) in the financial statements, net of discounts for the conversion and warrant features. The discounts were being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of each note and are fully expensed as of March 31, 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, amortization of approximately $7,000 and $457,000, respectively, for these discounts has been recorded in interest expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, amortization of $-0- and approximately $155,000, respectively, for these discounts has been recorded in interest expense. All outstanding warrants related to this offering have also been re-priced into our second note offering.

During April 2009, the Company commenced another offering of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and a warrant. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had raised a total of $1,198,500 of investment proceeds. One note was converted during the second quarter of 2009 and one note was converted during the second quarter 2010 leaving $1,163,500 face value of notes outstanding. Each convertible promissory note carries a one-year term and a 6% interest rate. In addition, each note can be converted, at the note holder’s option, at any time during the one-year term into shares of Common Stock at $0.08 per share, or prior to the closing of any Qualifying Equity Financing (minimum capital received of $5 million). Each note was issued with a warrant to purchase additional shares of Common Stock to provide for 100% coverage of the promissory note at a price of $0.30 per share. These promissory notes have been recorded as short-term debt (notes payable) in the financial statements, net of discounts for the conversion and warrant features. The discounts are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of each note. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, amortization of approximately $214,000 and $54,000, respectively, for these discounts has been recorded in interest expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, amortization of approximately $59,000 and $40,000, respectively, for these discounts has been recorded in interest expense.

During June 2010, the Company commenced another offering of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and a warrant. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had raised a total of $75,000 of investment proceeds. Each convertible promissory note carries a one-year term, a 12% interest rate and a payback provision of the note if $250,000 or more in the aggregate is raised by the Company in future offerings. In addition, each note can be converted, at the note holder’s option, at any time during the one-year term into shares of Common Stock at $0.08 per share, or prior to the closing of any Qualifying Equity Financing (minimum capital received of $5 million). Each note was issued with a warrant to purchase additional shares of Common Stock to provide for 100% coverage of the promissory note at a price of $0.30 per share. The promissory note has been recorded as short-term debt (notes payable) in the financial statements, net of discounts for the conversion and warrant features. The discounts are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of each note. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, amortization of approximately $6,000 and $7,000, respectively, for these discounts has been recorded in interest expense.

CMS Acquisition, LLC Note Payable

In September 2010, the Company issued a note in the amount of $100,000 (interest at 6.0% per annum and secured by a security interest in the PSC Patent) and issued warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.05 per share. The note is due the earlier of: (i) February 28, 2011 or (ii) the date on which $500,000 or more in the aggregate is raised by the Company in future offerings. The warrants are exercisable at any time for five years from the date of issuance or reissuance. The value of these warrants has been recorded as a contra-balance amount discount with the note and is being amortized through interest expense. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, amortization of approximately $2,000 for this discount has been recorded in interest expense.

Vertex (formerly WWT) Note Payable

As disclosed previously, as part of the purchase of the PSC Patent, the Company issued a note in the amount of $450,000 (interest at 6.0% per annum and secured by a security interest in the PSC Patent) and issued warrants to purchase 900,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.45 per share and to purchase an additional 900,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.45 per share contingent on payment of the note by July 22, 2009 (the original maturity date). WWT assigned all of its rights, title and interest in the note, warrants, security agreement and purchase agreement to Vertex Energy, Inc. as a result of a merger in March 2009. We entered into amendments dated July 23, 2009 whereby: (i) the Company paid 10% of the original note and all accrued interest to date, (ii) all previous warrants (totaling 1,800,000 shares) were reissued at a price of $0.11 per share with no contingencies and (iii) the remaining payments on the note were scheduled to be paid on October 22, 2009 (50% of principal plus accrued interest to date not yet paid) and January 22, 2010 (remaining principal and accrued interest to date). We entered into amendments dated October 22, 2009 whereby: (i) the October 22, 2009 payment was deferred until November 22, 2009 and (ii) we issued additional warrants to Vertex for 500,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.10 per share. The warrants are exercisable at any time for five years from the date of issuance or reissuance. The value of these warrants had been recorded as a contra-balance amount discount with the note and has been fully amortized through interest expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, amortization of this discount of approximately $7,000 and $150,000, respectively, has been recorded in interest expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, amortization of this discount of $-0- and approximately $35,000, respectively, has been recorded in interest expense. This note was paid in full in September 2010.

Series A Convertible Debentures

In April 2007, the Company sold $1,400,000 of Series A Convertible Debentures (“Debentures”), due April 16, 2010, that convert into shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.15 per share. The Company filed a registration statement with regard to the sale of these shares of Common Stock, which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 2, 2008. The debentures accrue interest at 6% per annum. The interest is payable in cash or shares of Common Stock at the Company’s option.

The Company received cash of $950,000 and Promissory Notes (“Notes”) with an aggregate principal amount of $450,000 that accrue interest at 6.0%. Effective with the listing of our Common Stock on the OTCBB on March 13, 2008 (previously traded on Pink Sheets) we received full payment on all principal and accrued interest on the Notes totaling approximately $475,000 on March 14, 2008.

During March 2008, various debenture holders converted an aggregate amount of $630,000 of our Debentures, plus interest earned, into 4,433,067 shares of our common stock. During April 2008, various debenture holders converted an aggregate amount of $630,000 of our Debentures, plus interest earned, into 4,455,844 shares of our common stock. The remaining $140,000 of Debentures matured on April 16, 2010 and, with interest earned, were converted into 2,069,375 shares of our common stock.

Note 7 — Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

In August 2010, certain notes receivable from former and current members of our Board of Directors matured. The notes were originally issued in August 2007 to purchase shares of our common stock. Two of the former directors declined to pay these notes or extend the due date. As a result, 300,000 shares of restricted stock, issued at $0.15 per share, were forfeited and cancelled. The two other Directors agreed to extend the due date of their notes to August 2012. As the notes were carried in additional paid-in capital, there was no effect on our financial results for the period from the write-off of these notes.

In June 2010, the Company issued 133,480 shares of Common Stock ($0.08 per share) to an investor upon the conversion of a Convertible Note.

In April 2010, the Company issued 2,069,375 shares of Common Stock ($0.08 per share) upon the conversion of $140,000 of the Company’s Debentures and accrued interest of approximately $25,000.

In February 2010, the Company issued 150,000 restricted shares of our common stock at $0.10 per share to our newly elected director. The director issued a promissory note to the Company in exchange for the stock purchases similar to the restricted share grants to all other directors. See the share-based footnote for further details.

In June, September and December 2009, the Company issued 625,000, 300,000 and 625,000, respectively, of restricted shares of our common stock at $0.12, $0.10 and $0.06 per share, respectively, to a consultant pursuant to their consulting agreement and directors. For all of these restricted common stock grants, each individual issued promissory notes to the Company in exchange for their stock purchases. See the share-based footnote for further details.

In August 2009, the Company issued 357,778 shares of Common Stock ($0.13 per share) to the holders of two separate warrants under the Net Issuance clause of the warrant agreements.

During 2009, the Company issued 466,268 shares of Common Stock ($0.25 per share) and 687,500 shares of Common Stock ($0.08 per share) to investors upon conversion of the Convertible Notes.

Net Loss per share — The Company calculates basic loss per share (“EPS”) and diluted EPS. EPS is computed as net loss divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS would reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options, warrants and other convertible securities. As of September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had options, warrants and other convertible securities to purchase an aggregate of approximately 43 million and 26 million shares of our common stock, respectively, that were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share as their effects would have been anti-dilutive. Therefore, the Company only presents basic loss per share on the face of the statement of operations.

Note 8 — Related Party Transactions

The Company had a $72,103 advance from one of its board of director members at December 31, 2006 evidenced by a promissory note that accrued interest at 9.5% per annum. The promissory note also contained an option to acquire 5% of the outstanding capital stock of SRS Energy at a price of $250,000. In April 2007, the indebtedness under the promissory note was repaid and the promissory note was cancelled. Under its terms, the right to exercise the option to purchase shares survived after the repayment of the indebtedness under the note. As part of the merger consideration issued by the Company pursuant to the acquisition of SRS Energy, the Company issued a warrant exercisable until August 31, 2009 to purchase 1,923,495 shares of its common stock at $0.13 per share to replace the option included in the promissory note on substantially similar terms as the option. In August 2009, this warrant was exercised under the Net Issuance clause of the warrant agreement resulting in 178,889 shares being issued.

In September 2009 and February 2010, the Company entered into stock purchase agreements with certain members of the Board of Directors. The directors issued notes to the Company in exchange for their stock purchases. See Share-Based Payments footnote for further discussion. These notes and accumulated interest are recorded as notes receivable in Stockholders’ Deficit.

In August 2010, certain notes receivable from former and current members of our Board of Directors matured. The notes were originally issued in August 2007 to purchase shares of our common stock. Two of the former directors declined to pay these notes or extend the due date. As a result, 300,000 shares of restricted stock, issued at $0.15 per share, were forfeited and cancelled. The two other Directors agreed to extend the due date of their notes to August 2012.

The Company had engaged the law firm of Sauerwein, Simon and Blanchard (“SSB”) related to various issues including our reverse merger, our SB-2 registration statement, litigation matters and general business activity. A member of our board of directors is a partner of SSB. Since December 31, 2008, we incurred less than $100 in legal fees with SSB. As of September 30, 2010, all amounts have been paid to SSB except for approximately $90,000.

The Company uses the Crane Agency (“Crane”) as its broker for business and property insurance. Our CEO’s brother is employed by Crane and was involved in the negotiation of coverage and premiums related to policies. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company paid less than $3,000 and $3,000, respectively, in commissions on policies placed by Crane.

Beginning in 2009, the Company has provided advances to two employees — Ed Hennessey and Mike Kime. Mr. Kime resigned from his positions with the Company effective June 21, 2010. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the aggregate balances of advances totaled approximately $32,000 and $22,000, respectively. The balances are included in Prepaids and Other Current Assets on the Balance Sheet.

Three members of our Board of Directors, Dr. Jackson Nickerson, Mr. Jose Bared, Sr. and David Bransby are parties in investments made in our convertible note offerings. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the aggregate amount due on these investments, including interest, is approximately $605,000 and $518,000, respectively.

Note 9 — Share-based Payments

In January 2010, the Company granted options under the 2007 Stock Option Plan to purchase an aggregate of 120,000 shares of Common Stock to a consultant that vested immediately, with an exercise price of $0.07 per share. In February 2010, the Company issued 150,000 shares of restricted Common Stock to our new director, Jose Bared, Sr. Under the agreement Mr. Bared agreed to purchase 150,000 shares of restricted Common Stock of the Company at a cost of $0.10 per share. Mr. Bared issued a promissory note to the Company in exchange for the stock purchase. The shares purchased under the agreement are restricted shares subject to a right, but not obligation, of repurchase by the Company. The Company may exercise its repurchase right only during the 60 day period following a director’s termination of service on the Board of Directors. Commencing on February 28, 2010, the Company’s repurchase rights lapse at the rate of 8,333 shares per month of continuous service by each director through January 31, 2011, when the Company’s repurchase rights lapse on 4,167 shares per month of continuous board service until the repurchase rights have lapsed on all restricted shares. At September 30, 2010, 175,010 shares remain subject to a right of repurchase on all outstanding restricted stock grants to our directors. Additionally, the Company granted options under the Stock Plan to purchase 40,000 shares of Common Stock to Mr. Bared, with an exercise price of $0.10, that vest ratably over two years. None of these options were cancelled or expired as of September 30, 2010. As of September 30, 2010, 120,000 of these options were vested.

In August 2010, certain notes receivable from former and current members of our Board of Directors matured. The notes were originally issued in August 2007 to purchase shares of our common stock. Two of the former directors declined to pay these notes or extend the due date. As a result, 300,000 shares of restricted stock, issued at $0.15 per share, were forfeited and cancelled. The two other Directors agreed to extend the due date of their notes to August 2012.

The Company has recorded stock-based compensation expense of approximately $27,000 and $108,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively and approximately $89,000 and $319,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, for the issued stock option grants. Related to these grants, the Company will record future compensation expense of approximately $10,000 for the remaining three months of 2010. The potential tax benefit realizable for the anticipated tax deductions of the exercise of share-based payment arrangements totaled approximately $280,000 and $240,000 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. However, due to the uncertainty that the tax benefits will be realized, these potential benefits were not recognized currently.

As of September 30, 2010, there was approximately $36,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to all current share-based payment arrangements, which will be recognized over a remaining period of approximately 1.5 years. There are 713,333 options granted that are not yet vested as of September 30, 2010. These options have a weighted average exercise price of $0.18.

						Weighted
		Shares Under				Average				Aggregate
		Option				Exercise Price				intrinsic value
Options outstanding at December 31, 2009			6,815,000			$	0.18				(1)
Granted			322,000				0.07
Exercised			—
Forfeited			(1,600,000	)			0.26
Options outstanding at September 30, 2010			5,537,000			$	0.15				(1)
Options exercisable at September 30, 2010			4,823,667			$	0.14				(1)

Note 10 — Commitments and Contingencies

Leases — The Company entered into a lease on October 16, 2007 (and took occupancy in January 2008) to rent approximately 1,800 square feet of office space for use as our corporate office, located at 7386 Pershing Ave. in St. Louis, Missouri for a term of three years. Our monthly rent under the lease is $1,800 plus the cost of utilities. We entered into a lease for office furniture in January 2008. The lease payments are approximately $450 per month for 36 months. This lease is accounted for as a capital lease for accounting purposes.

Note 11 — Subsequent Events

Beginning in April 2009, the Company commenced a second offering of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and a warrant. As of November 9, 2010, the Company has received $1,198,500 in investment proceeds. Each convertible promissory note carries a one-year term and a 6% interest rate. In addition, each note can be converted into shares of Common Stock at $0.08 per share, at the Note holder’s option. Each note was issued with a warrant to purchase additional shares of Common Stock to provide 100% coverage of the Note at a price of $0.30 per share. Under the first offering of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and warrants, which is now closed, the Company received $642,000 in investment proceeds.

Certain promissory notes in our second offering of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and a warrant (notes convertible at $0.08 per share) came due in April through September 2010. These promissory notes totaling approximately $497,000 (including approximately $39,000 of accrued interest through November 9, 2010), have not yet been repaid, refinanced or converted to shares of our common stock. We plan to work with each noteholder to extend the terms of, or convert, these promissory notes. There can be no assurance that we will reach agreements with any or all of these noteholders and we may be required to repay such amounts.

Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

From time to time, we make written or oral statements that are “forward-looking,” including statements contained in this report and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in our reports to stockholders. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, provide a safe harbor for such forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included herein regarding our strategy, future operations, financial position, future revenues, projected costs, prospects, plans, objectives and other future events and circumstances are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “projects,” “would,” “should” and similar expressions or negative expressions of these terms. Such statements are only predictions and, accordingly, are subject to substantial risks, uncertainties and assumptions.

Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. We caution you that any forward-looking statement reflects only our belief at the time the statement is made. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee our future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Refer to our Risk Factors section of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on March 30, 2010, for a full description of factors we believe could cause actual results or events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements that we make. These factors include:

•

our ability to raise additional capital on favorable terms to continue operating and to develop our technologies;

•

the commercial viability of our technologies,

•

our ability to maintain and enforce our exclusive rights to our technologies,

•

the demand for and production costs of various energy products made from our biomass,

•

competition from other alternative energy technologies, and

•

other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in our filings with the SEC.

Although we believe the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it is not possible to foresee or identify all factors that could have a material and negative impact on our future performance. The forward-looking statements in this report are made on the basis of management’s assumptions and analyses as of the time the statements are made, in light of their experience and perception of historical conditions, expected future developments and other factors believed to be appropriate under the circumstances.

Company Overview

The following discussion of our company overview and plan of operation should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes to the financial statements included elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that relate to future events or our future financial performance. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity or performance to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity or performance. These risks and other factors include, among others, those listed under “Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information.”

We are a development stage company focused on being a provider of: (i) cellulosic biomass derived from municipal solid waste, also known as MSW, as a feedstock for producing energy and other chemical products and (ii) recyclables (metals, plastics, glass) from the MSW.

We were originally incorporated in 1996 as Long Road Entertainment, Inc., and were formed to operate as a holding company for businesses in the theater, motion picture and entertainment industries. We ceased conducting that business in 2005 and were dormant until the fall of 2006, at which time our founder and then controlling stockholder decided to pursue the sale of the company. In anticipation of that sale, we changed our name to Alternative Ethanol Technologies, Inc.

On March 27, 2007, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization in which we agreed to acquire SRS Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation that is the holder of the technology licenses. Pursuant to the merger agreement, SRS Acquisition Sub, our wholly-owned subsidiary, merged into SRS Energy with SRS Energy as the surviving corporation. We consummated the merger on May 31, 2007 resulting in SRS Energy becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary. Effective August 2, 2007, we changed our name to CleanTech Biofuels, Inc.

SRS Energy was originally formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Supercritical Recovery Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, in July 2004. At that time, Supercritical Recovery Systems, Inc. was a licensee of various technologies for the processing of waste materials into usable products. Prior to our acquisition of SRS Energy, Supercritical Recovery Systems, Inc. distributed approximately 80% of its ownership of SRS Energy to the stockholders of Supercritical Recovery Systems, Inc. Since our acquisition of SRS Energy, Supercritical Recovery Systems, Inc. has ceased its business activities with respect to licensing other technologies.

In September 2008, we acquired the exclusive rights to use the Biomass Recovery System developed by Anthony Noll that we refer to as our Biomass Recovery Process in the United States and Canada. Our rights to use the Biomass Recovery Process technology permit us to use the biomass we derive from MSW to produce all energy products. In addition, in October 2008, we acquired the patent (the “PSC Patent”) for the pressurized steam classification (“PSC”) technology from World Waste Technologies (“WWT”), who previously had purchased the patent from the University of Alabama Huntsville. As a result we became the licensor of the PSC technology to Bio-Products International, Inc. (“Bio-Products”) under its Master License Agreement. Bio-Products was the sublicensor of the PSC technology to us.

Since early 2008, we had been in litigation against Bio-Products regarding our use of the PSC technology. In March 2009, we entered into a Settlement Agreement with Bio-Products settling all claims. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, in addition to a customary mutual release, Bio-Products entered into a covenant not to sue whereby Bio-Products and its related parties agreed to permit us to use the Biomass Recovery Process technology worldwide, for any product that we desire and with no royalty due to Bio-Products. We also terminated our License Agreement with Bio-Products and have no further obligations thereunder. We continue to be the licensor of the PSC Patent to Bio-Products under the Master License Agreement and we continue to own the PSC Patent. As a result of the Settlement Agreement, we are now capable of using the Biomass Recovery Process technology to produce any energy product that we desire and are no longer limited to production of fuel grade ethanol in the United States.

We have no operating history as a producer of biomass feedstocks or any energy products and have not constructed any operating plants to date. We have not earned any revenues to date and expect that our current capital and other existing resources will no longer be sufficient to fund the development of our technologies or our required working capital. We will require substantial additional capital to implement our business plan and we may be unable to immediately obtain the capital required to continue operating.

Recent Developments

Beginning in April 2009, the Company commenced a second offering of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and a warrant. As of November 9, 2010, the Company has received $1,198,500 in investment proceeds. Each convertible promissory note carries a one-year term and a 6% interest rate. In addition, each note can be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), at $0.08 per share, at the Note holder’s option. Each note was issued with a warrant to purchase additional shares of Common Stock to provide 100% coverage of the Note at a price of $0.30 per share. Under the first offering of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and warrants, which is now closed, the Company received $642,000 in investment proceeds.

On May 4, 2010, we entered into a joint research agreement with Ze-Gen, Inc., a developer of technology for converting biomass into a variety of fuel products and other chemical products, whereby we agreed to provide biomass to Ze-Gen, Inc. for testing in their proprietary processes.

In June 2010, we entered into an engagement agreement with Houlihan Smith & Company (now Houlihan Capital, “Houlihan”) whereby Houlihan will assist the Company in exploring and evaluating a range of strategic financing alternatives and/or other transactions.

In July 2010, we entered into an agreement with Fiberight LLC (Fiberight) to install our test vessel (formerly in Kentucky) at Fiberight’s cellulosic ethanol pilot plant in Lawrenceville, Virginia. We anticipate that our vessel will be installed and operational during the second quarter 2011. Once upgraded and installed, the vessel is expected to produce cellulosic biomass feedstock for Fiberight’s Targeted Fuel Extraction process. We expect such production should further validate our licensed Biomass Recovery Process, which we believe could then be used for on-site cellulosic biomass feedstock production for alternative energy producers. Additionally, we will have access to biomass produced at the Lawrenceville plant for delivery to other companies interested in testing it as feedstock in their conversion technologies.

In July 2010, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued US patent number 7,745,208 to the process and apparatus for converting MSW into cellulosic biomass feedstock, which we refer to collectively as the Biomass Recovery Process. The Company has exclusive rights to the Biomass Recovery Process in the United States and Canada through our licensing agreement with Biomass North America LLC.

On September 22, 2010, the Company sent a Notice of Breach to the licensee of our PSC Patent. We received a response from the licensee on November 5, 2010 and are currently working to resolve the issues raised by the Company and the licensee.

Plan of Operation

The following discussion of our plan of operation should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes to the financial statements included elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that relate to future events or our future financial performance. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity or performance to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity or performance. These risks and other factors include, among others, those listed under “Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information.”

Our focus has shifted primarily to securing additional capital immediately. We currently do not have sufficient capital to continue operations. All of the projects described below require a significant amount of capital that we currently do not have. While we continue to aggressively pursue capital, we have not had recent success securing meaningful amounts of financing. As a result, we can provide no assurance that we will secure any capital in the immediate time frame required and the failure to do so will likely result in an inability to continue operations.

Our company was initially conceived as a fully-integrated producer of cellulosic ethanol using the PSC technology for cleaning and separating MSW into its component parts, and a dilute acid hydrolysis technology developed by Brelsford Engineering, Inc. To further enhance our ability to produce ethanol, in 2008 we licensed a technology that uses nitric acid to hydrolyze biomass into ethanol. The technology developed at the University of California Berkeley is controlled by HFTA, Inc. pursuant to a Master License Agreement with the University of California Berkeley and was sublicensed to us for the production of ethanol from MSW.

Based on our investigation and acquisition of new technologies and research and development of our existing technologies in 2008, we re-focused our business to the commercialization of our Biomass Recovery Process technology for cleaning and separating MSW into its component parts through the acquisition of further technology to clean and separate MSW, and set about to consolidate the ownership and/or rights to use intellectual property around this technology. The technology is currently in use by another operator in a commercial setting in Australia. As a result, we believe this technology is ready for commercial implementation in the United States and elsewhere. In furtherance of our new focus, we are currently in the process of raising capital to design and build a commercial biomass recovery plant to provide biomass feedstock for customer evaluation and trial purchases. Initially, the biomass feedstock output will be sold or provided to electric utilities, power and steam producers, and biofuel research firms for evaluation. In addition to research and development, the Company is also working towards licensing and/or developing potential commercial projects. These projects plan to focus on cleaning and separating MSW into its component parts in order to obtain: (i) a homogenous feedstock of cellulosic biomass for producing energy and other chemical products and (ii) recyclable products (metals, plastics).

As a result of our focus on converting MSW into a biomass feedstock for energy or chemical products, we determined that we no longer would use the Brelsford and HFTA technologies. In the fourth quarter of 2008, Brelsford Engineering, Inc. terminated our license to the Brelsford technology for non-payment of certain fees. We decided not to use the technology going forward in our operations and wrote off the remaining asset as of December 31, 2008. The impairment loss of $97,500 is included in research and development expense on the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008. Additionally, we terminated our agreement with HFTA, Inc. during the fourth quarter of 2009 as we determined to not use the HFTA technology going forward in our operations. We wrote off the related asset of approximately $693,000 as an impairment loss and the loss is included in research and development expense on the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Biomass Feedstock Production

The Company plans to design and build a commercial biomass recovery plant to provide biomass feedstock for customer evaluation and trial purchases. Initially, the biomass feedstock output will be sold or provided to electric utilities, power and steam producers, and biofuel and chemical research firms for evaluation. In addition to research and development, the Company is also working towards licensing and/or developing potential commercial projects.

We have completed construction of a small test vessel in Kentucky. Beginning in April 2009, this vessel has processed approximately 12 tons of MSW into approximately 4-5 tons of biomass. We have provided the biomass produced during this testing phase to a number of fuel producers who are evaluating the biomass we produce from MSW as a feedstock for their technologies. In July 2010, we entered into an agreement with Fiberight to install this test vessel at Fiberight’s cellulosic ethanol pilot plant in Lawrenceville, Virginia. We anticipate our vessel to be installed and operational during the second quarter 2011. Once upgraded and installed, the vessel is expected to produce cellulosic biomass feedstock for Fiberight’s Targeted Fuel Extraction process. We expect such production should further validate our licensed Biomass Recovery Process, which we believe could then be used for on-site cellulosic biomass feedstock production for alternative energy producers. Additionally, we will have access to biomass produced at the Lawrenceville plant for delivery to other companies interested in testing it as feedstock in their conversion technologies.

We are considering the possibility of implementing our technology in Maryville, Missouri. The biomass produced would potentially be supplied to Northwest Missouri State University for research purposes in advanced biofuel technologies and to supply steam for the University. The University has used biomass to produce steam for more than twenty years and has significant experience in handling biomass feedstocks.

We are also seeking to develop a plant in a major metropolitan area. We are working to develop one or more locations where waste collected would be processed using our technology and the biomass produced used to create heat and/or power.

In addition to the developments we are currently contemplating, other development opportunities have been presented to us and we are currently evaluating those potential developments. Upon operating a plant and after refining our know-how with respect to implementation of the technology, we intend to seek to partner with waste haulers, landfill owners and municipalities to implement the technology across the United States and internationally.

The further implementation of the licensing of our technology and/or the development of commercial plants described above will require significant additional capital, which we currently do not have. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to raise this additional capital. While we anticipate that financing for the commercial biomass recovery plant and these other potential projects could also be provided in part via tax exempt bond financing or through the use of loan guarantees from local, state and federal authorities, we have not secured any such financing and there can be no assurance that we will be able to secure any such financing.

Diesel Fuel Production

We previously anticipated completing an agreement with Green Power, Inc. (“Green Power”) to provide biomass for testing at Green Power’s facility and if that proves successful, to build a 200 ton per day MSW processing station to provide biomass for an existing 100 ton per day diesel fuel production plant. To date we have not been able to reach an agreement as to the nature and amount of biomass to be produced or other key terms of this relationship that are required for us to proceed. These issues and a number of other items will be required to be resolved before we are able to complete any agreement with Green Power. We have not completed an agreement to date and there can be no assurance that we will complete any agreement and proceed with this development.

Bio-Fuel and Bio-Chemical Joint Testing/Research

As soon as we are able to process MSW into biomass through our future biomass recovery plant, our test vessel at Fiberight’s facility in Virginia, and/or in future commercial vessels, we plan to enter into joint research agreements with companies looking to process biomass in their system(s) for various types of energy and chemical production. This testing and research will provide possible revenue streams, projects and additional opportunities for use of our biomass.

In August 2009, we entered into a joint research agreement with GeoSyn Fuels, L.L.C. (“GeoSyn”) whereby we agreed to provide GeoSyn with biomass feedstock derived from MSW from the City of Chicago for GeoSyn’s testing of their proprietary process for converting biomass into ethanol and other products.

In May 2010, we entered into a joint research agreement with Ze-Gen, Inc., a developer of technology for converting biomass into a variety of fuel products and other chemical products, whereby we agreed to provide biomass to Ze-Gen, Inc. for testing in their proprietary processes.

New Technologies; Commercializing Existing Technologies

Because of our unique ability to produce a clean, homogenous biomass feedstock, we are frequently presented with the opportunity to partner with or acquire new technologies. In addition to developing our current technologies, we will continue to add technologies to our suite of solutions that complement our core operations. We believe that our current technologies and aspects of those in development will enable us to eventually expand our business to use organic material from other waste streams such as municipal bio-solids from waste water facilities and animal waste for fuel production.

To commercialize our technology, we intend to:

•

construct and operate and/or license a commercial plant that: (i) processes MSW into cellulosic biomass for conversion into energy or chemical products and (ii) separates recyclables (metals, plastics, glass) for single-stream recycling;

•

identify and partner with landfill owners, waste haulers and municipalities to identify locations suitable for our technology; and

•

pursue additional opportunities to implement our technology in commercial settings at transfer stations and landfills in the United States and elsewhere in the world.

Our ability to implement this strategy will depend on our ability to raise significant amounts of additional capital and to hire appropriate managers and staff. Our success will also depend on a variety of market forces and other developments beyond our control.

Results of Operations

The following tables set forth the amounts of expenses and changes represented by certain items reflected in our consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

		Three months ended
		Sept. 30, 2010				Sept. 30, 2009				Change
General and administrative		$	155,019			$	288,740			$	(133,721	)
Professional fees			32,988				64,657				(31,669	)
Operating loss			188,007				353,397				(165,390	)
Other expense (income):
Interest expense			101,302				253,657				(152,355	)
Other expense (income)			4,377				(3,431	)			7,808
Net loss applicable to common stockholders		$	293,686			$	603,623			$	(309,937	)

General and administrative — The decrease in expense in 2010 is due primarily to a reduction in expense of approximately $40,000 in payroll, $60,000 in share-based compensation and $20,000 in marketing expenses.

Professional Fees — The decrease in 2010 is due primarily to a reduction in legal fees of approximately $30,000.

Interest expense — The decrease in 2010 is due primarily to a reduction in the amortization of discounts related to various notes of approximately $160,000. These notes mature in one year and were issued from October 2008 through September 2010 and thus some discounts have been fully expensed.

		Nine months ended
		Sept. 30, 2010				Sept. 30, 2009				Change
General and administrative		$	591,770			$	877,567			$	(285,797	)
Professional fees			107,458				257,231				(149,773	)
Research and development			—				101				(101	)
Operating loss			699,228				1,134,899				(435,671	)
Other expense (income):
Interest expense			325,446				725,949				(400,503	)
Other income			(4,353	)			(39,938	)			35,585
Net loss applicable to common stockholders		$	1,020,321			$	1,820,910			$	(800,589	)

General and administrative — The decrease in expense in 2010 is due primarily to a reduction in expense of approximately $210,000 in share-based compensation, $45,000 in payroll and $45,000 in marketing expenses.

Professional Fees — The decrease in 2010 is due primarily to a reduction in legal fees of approximately $120,000 and accounting and consulting fees of approximately $30,000.

Interest expense — The decrease in 2010 is due primarily to a reduction in the amortization of discounts related to various notes of approximately $425,000 offset by an increase of approximately $25,000 in interest expense on the convertible notes. These notes mature in one year and were issued from October 2008 through September 2010 and thus some discounts have been fully expensed.

Other income — The other income in 2009 was for a two-month lease and subsequent sale of the HFTA equipment previously purchased.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As a development-stage company, we have no revenues and will be required to raise additional capital to continue operations, execute our business plan and commercialize our products. Beginning in September 2008 and as of November 9, 2010, we raised an aggregate of $2,015,500, in separate note issuances from investors in exchange for units comprised of a convertible note and warrants. We are continuing to explore opportunities to raise cash through the issuance of these units and other financing opportunities. As of November 9, 2010, our current cash is not sufficient to fund our operations. Our liabilities are substantially greater than our current available funds. We are seeking additional financing through the sale of additional equity, various government funding opportunities and/or possibly through strategic alliances with larger energy or waste management companies. Houlihan will assist the Company in exploring and evaluating a range of strategic financing alternatives and/or other transactions. However, we may not be successful in securing additional capital. If we are not able to obtain additional financing in the immediate future, we will be required to delay our development until such financing becomes available and may be required to cease operations. Further, even assuming that we secure additional funds, we may never achieve profitability or positive cash flow. If we are not able to timely and successfully raise additional capital and/or achieve profitability or positive cash flow, we will not have sufficient capital resources to implement our business plan or to continue our operations.

Debt

Convertible Notes Payable

During September 2008, the Company commenced an offering of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and a warrant. The Company raised a total of $642,000 of investment proceeds through March 31, 2009 and this offering is closed. As of March 31, 2010, all of these notes have either been converted to shares of our common stock or re-priced to our second convertible note offering (resulting in new notes with a total face value of $539,829, which included the original principal and interest through the date of re-pricing). Each convertible promissory note carried a one-year term and a 6% interest rate. In addition, each note could have been converted, at the note holder’s option, at any time during the one-year term into shares of Common Stock at $0.25 per share, or prior to the closing of any Qualifying Equity Financing (minimum capital received of $5 million). Each note was issued with a warrant to purchase additional shares of Common Stock equal to the principal amount of the promissory note at a price of $0.45 per share. These promissory notes had been recorded as short-term debt (notes payable) in the financial statements, net of discounts for the conversion and warrant features. The discounts were being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of each note and are fully expensed as of March 31, 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, amortization of approximately $7,000 and $457,000, respectively, for these discounts has been recorded in interest expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, amortization of $-0- and approximately $155,000, respectively, for these discounts has been recorded in interest expense. All outstanding warrants related to this offering have also been re-priced into our second note offering.

During April 2009, the Company commenced a second offering of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and a warrant. As of September 30, 2010, the Company raised a total of $1,198,500 of investment proceeds. One note was converted during the second quarter of 2009 and one note was converted during the second quarter 2010 leaving $1,163,500 face value of notes outstanding. Each convertible promissory note carries a one-year term and a 6% interest rate. In addition, each note can be converted, at the note holder’s option, at any time during the one-year term into shares of Common Stock at $0.08 per share, or prior to the closing of any Qualifying Equity Financing (minimum capital received of $5 million). Each note was issued with a warrant to purchase additional shares of Common Stock to provide for 100% coverage of the promissory note at a price of $0.30 per share. These promissory notes have been recorded as short-term debt (notes payable) in the financial statements, net of discounts for the conversion and warrant features. The discounts are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of each note. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, amortization of approximately $214,000 and $54,000, respectively, for these discounts has been recorded in interest expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, amortization of approximately $59,000 and $40,000, respectively, for these discounts has been recorded in interest expense.

During June 2010, the Company commenced another offering of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and a warrant. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had raised a total of $75,000 of investment proceeds. Each convertible promissory note carries a one-year term, a 12% interest rate and a payback provision of the note if $250,000 or more in the aggregate is raised by the Company in future offerings. In addition, each note can be converted, at the note holder’s option, at any time during the one-year term into shares of Common Stock at $0.08 per share, or prior to the closing of any Qualifying Equity Financing (minimum capital received of $5 million). Each note was issued with a warrant to purchase additional shares of Common Stock to provide for 100% coverage of the promissory note at a price of $0.30 per share. The promissory note has been recorded as short-term debt (notes payable) in the financial statements, net of discounts for the conversion and warrant features. The discounts are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of each note. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, amortization of approximately $6,000 and $7,000, respectively, for these discounts has been recorded in interest expense.

CMS Acquisition, LLC Note Payable

In September 2010, the Company issued a note in the amount of $100,000 (interest at 6.0% per annum and secured by a security interest in the PSC Patent) and issued warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.05 per share. The note is due the earlier of: (i) February 28, 2011 or (ii) the date on which $500,000 or more in the aggregate is raised by the Company in future offerings. The warrants are exercisable at any time for five years from the date of issuance or reissuance. The value of these warrants has been recorded as a contra-balance amount discount with the note and is being amortized through interest expense. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, amortization of approximately $2,000 for this discount has been recorded in interest expense.

Summary of Cash Flow Activity

		Nine months ended September 30,
		2010				2009
Net cash used by operating activities		$	(215,688	)		$	(589,978	)
Net cash used by investing activities			—				(20,702	)
Net cash provided by financing activities			216,342				534,097

Net cash used by operating activities

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, cash used by operating activities was impacted primarily by increases in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities.

Net cash used by investing activities

During 2009, cash used by investing activities was for the purchase of a small-scale test vessel.

Net cash provided by financing activities

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the decrease in cash provided by financing activities was primarily due to the issuance of $175,000 less in investment notes payable and an increase of approximately $130,000 in note payments compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

In the table below, we set forth our obligations as of September 30, 2010. Some of the figures we include in this table are based on our estimates and assumptions about these obligations, including their durations, anticipated actions by third parties and other factors. The obligations we may pay in future periods may vary from those reflected in this table because of estimates or actions of third parties as disclosed in the notes to the table.

		Payments due by Period
						Less than 1												More than 5
		Total				year				1 to 3 years				4 to 5 years				years
Convertible Notes (1)		$	1,890,000			$	1,890,000			$	—			$	—			$	—
CMS Acquition Note (2)			106,000				106,000				—				—				—
Capital Lease (3)			2,700				2,700				—				—				—
Operating Lease (4)			5,400				5,400				—				—				—
Total contractual obligations		$	2,004,100			$	2,004,100			$	—			$	—			$	—

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Certain accounting issues require management estimates and judgments for the preparation of financial statements. Our management periodically evaluates the estimates and judgments made. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates as a result of different assumptions or conditions.

We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments relating to long-lived assets, convertible notes and warrants, fair-value measurement, share-based compensation and income tax matters have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements. Therefore, we consider these to be our critical accounting estimates. Our critical accounting policies and estimates are more fully described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2010. Our critical accounting policies and estimate assumptions have not changed during the three months ended September 30, 2010.

Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4T.		Controls and Procedures

Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures — We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Security and Exchange Commission’s rules and regulations. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that this information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will necessarily prevent all fraud and material error. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the objectives outlined above. Based on their most recent evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at that reasonable assurance level at September 30, 2010. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, including, but not limited to having two total employees (chief executive officer and chief financial officer), and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting — During the three months ended September 30, 2010, there were no material changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.		Legal Proceedings

Item 1A.		Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report and below in this Item, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. These cautionary statements are to be used as a reference in connection with any forward-looking statements. The factors, risks and uncertainties identified in these cautionary statements are in addition to those contained in any other cautionary statements, written or oral, which may be made or otherwise addressed in connection with a forward-looking statement or contained in any of our subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We need to obtain financing for current operations.

We do not currently have enough cash to fund our operations. If we are not able to obtain additional financing in the immediate future, we will be required to delay our development until such financing becomes available and may be required to cease operations.

We may not be able to attract and retain management and other personnel we need to succeed.

With the resignation of our General Counsel/Chief Operating Officer in June 2010, we currently have only two full-time executives, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. As a result, part of our success depends on our ability to recruit senior management and other key technology development, construction and operations employees. We cannot be certain that we will be able to attract, retain and motivate such employees. The inability to hire and retain one or more of these employees could cause delays or prevent us from implementing our business strategy. The majority of our new hires could be engineers, project managers and operations personnel. There is intense competition from other companies and research and academic institutions for qualified personnel in the areas of our activities. If we cannot attract and retain, on acceptable terms, the qualified personnel necessary for the development of our business, we may not be able to commence operations or grow at an acceptable pace.

Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds —

During April 2009, the Company commenced a second offering of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and a warrant. As of September 30, 2010, the Company raised a total of $1,198,500 of investment proceeds. Each convertible promissory note carries a one-year term and a 6% interest rate. In addition, each note can be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), at $0.08 per share at the holder’s option. Each note was issued with a warrant to purchase additional shares of Common Stock to provide 100% coverage of the principal amount of the associated note at a price of $0.30 per share. One note was converted during the second quarter of 2009 and one note was converted during the second quarter 2010 leaving $1,163,500 face value of notes outstanding. The issuance of units and the issuance of Common Stock upon conversion of notes were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act (“Rule 506”) and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

In September 2010, the Company issued a note in the amount of $100,000 (interest at 6.0% per annum and secured by a security interest in the PSC Patent) with a warrant to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.05 per share. The issuance of Common Stock upon conversion of the warrant was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 506 and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities — Certain promissory notes in our second offering of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and a warrant (notes convertible at $0.08 per share) came due in April through September 2010. These promissory notes totaling approximately $497,000 (including approximately $39,000 of accrued interest through November 9, 2010), have not yet been repaid, refinanced or converted to shares of our common stock. We plan to work with each noteholder to extend the terms of, or convert, these promissory notes. There can be no assurance that we will reach agreements with any or all of these noteholders and we may be required to repay such amounts.

Item 4.		Reserved.

Item 5.		Other Information

Item 6.		Exhibits

(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this Report.

EXHIBIT NO.				DESCRIPTION
	31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
	31.2			Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
	32.1			Certification (Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of Chief Executive Officer.
	32.2			Certification (Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of Principal Financial Officer.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT NO.				DESCRIPTION
	31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
	31.2			Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
	32.1			Certification (Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of Chief Executive Officer.
	32.2			Certification (Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of Principal Financial Officer.