Attached files

file filename
EX-31 - EXHIBIT 31 - PEREGRINE INDUSTRIES INCexh31_1.htm
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - PEREGRINE INDUSTRIES INCexh32_1.htm


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________

FORM 10-K
_________________________________

ý   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010

 

¨    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No.: 0-27511

PEREGRINE INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact Name Of Registrant As Specified In Its Charter)

Florida 65-0611007
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
40 Wall Street, 28th Floor 10005
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (ZIP Code)
     

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (212) 400-7198

   

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of The Act: Common Stock, $0.0001

Indicate if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes 
x No ¨

Indicate if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in the definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
¨

On June 30, 20
10, the aggregate market value of the 36,258 common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $36,258 based on the bid price of the Registrants common stock on June 30, 2010.  On June 30, 2010, the Registrant had 524,200 shares of common stock outstanding.

Indicate whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) or a smaller reporting company .

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨  Non-Accelerated filer ¨  Smaller reporting company x

Indicate whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No ¨






TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item
____
   Description
   _________
Page
____
 
 

PART I

 
 
ITEM 1.    DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 2.    DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
 
 

PART II

 
 
ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND
     PLAN OF OPERATION
ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVEAND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
     FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION
 
 

PART III

 
 
ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
     RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES




PART I

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS Back to Table of Contents

Some of the statements contained in this Form 10-K of Peregrine Industries, Inc. (hereinafter the "Company", "We" or the "Registrant") discuss future expectations, contain projections of our plan of operation or financial condition or state other forward-looking information. In this registration statement, forward-looking statements are generally identified by the words such as "anticipate", "plan", "believe", "expect", "estimate", and the like. Forward-looking statements involve future risks and uncertainties, there are factors that could cause actual results or plans to differ materially from those expressed or implied. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the statements. The forward-looking information is based on various factors and is derived using numerous assumptions. A reader, whether investing in the Company's securities or not, should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Annual Report. Important factors that may cause actual results to differ from projections include, for example:

- the success or failure of management's efforts to implement the Registrant's plan of operation;
- the ability of the Registrant to fund its operating expenses;
- the ability of the Registrant to compete with other companies that have a similar plan of operation;
- the effect of changing economic conditions impacting our plan of operation;
- the ability of the Registrant to meet the other risks as may be described in future filings with the SEC.

Organizational History and General Background of the Registrant

The Company was incorporated in Florida in 1995 for the purpose of designing and manufacturing heat pump pool heaters, residential air conditioners and parallel flow coils for the heating, ventilation and air conditioning industry. In June 2002, the Registrant and its subsidiaries filed a petition for bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The Company emerged from bankruptcy in March 2004 free and clear of all liens, claims and obligations.

In connection with the order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court dated March 15, 2004, the Court authorized that Park Avenue Group appoint a new board of directors and authorized the issuance of restricted shares to the new management of the Registrant. The issuance of restricted shares to the Registrant's new management effectively resulted in a change in control of the Registrant. The shareholders of the Registrant prior to the bankruptcy proceedings remained shareholders of the Registrant subsequent to the emergence of the Registrant from bankruptcy. The Court order further provided that Registrant emerged from bankruptcy free and clear of liens, claims and interests. The court order authorized (i) that the existing officers and directors were deemed removed from office; (ii) the appointment of new members to the Registrant's board of directors; (iii) the amendment of Registrant's Article of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares to 100,000,000 shares; (iv) the issuance up to 30,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001, to the new management of the Registrant, which management was appointed by the newly-constituted board of directors; (v) the authority of the board of directors to implement a reverse split of the issued and outstanding shares in a ratio to be determined by the board of directors; (vi) the cancellation and extinguishment of all common share conversion rights of any kind, including without limitation, warrants, options, convertible bonds, other convertible debt instruments and convertible preferred stock; and (vii) the cancellation and extinguishment of all preferred shares of every series and accompanying conversion rights of any kind.

Business Objectives of the Registrant

As a result of the bankruptcy proceeding, the Registrant has no present operations. Management determined to direct its efforts and limited resources to pursue and effect a business combination.

    Current trends

Management believes that as a result of the relative uncertainty in the United States equity markets over the past few years, many privately-held companies have been closed off from the public market and traditional IPO's. During the past few years, many privately-held or public companies attempted to divest non-core assets and divisions and valuations of these assets and divisions have decreased significantly. Therefore, Management believes that there are substantial business opportunities to effect attractive acquisitions. As a public entity with its shares of common stock registered under the Exchange Act and publicly trading, Management believes to be well positioned to identify target acquisitions and to effect a business combination in order to take advantage of these current trends.

    Effecting a business combination

Prospective investors in the Company's common stock will invest in the Company without an opportunity to evaluate the specific merits or risks of any one or more business combinations. A business combination may involve the acquisition of, or merger with, a company which needs to raise substantial additional capital by means of being a publicly trading company, while avoiding what it may deem to be adverse consequences of undertaking a public offering itself. These include time delays, significant expense, loss of voting control and compliance with various Federal and state securities laws. A business combination may involve a company which may be financially unstable or in its early stages of development or growth.

    The Registrant has not identified a target business or target industry

The Company's effort in identifying a prospective target business will not be limited to a particular industry and the Company may ultimately acquire a business in any industry Management deems appropriate. To date, the Company has not selected any target business on which to concentrate our search for a business combination. While the Company intends to focus on target businesses in the United States, we are not limited to those entities and may consummate a business combination with a target business outside of the United States. Accordingly, there is no basis for investors in the Company's common stock to evaluate the possible merits or risks of the target business or the particular industry in which we may ultimately operate. To the extent we effect a business combination with a financially unstable company or an entity in its early stage of development or growth, including entities without established records of sales or earnings, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of financially unstable and early stage or potential emerging growth companies. In addition, to the extent that we effect a business combination with an entity in an industry characterized by a high level of risk, we may be affected by the currently unascertainable risks of that industry. An extremely high level of risk frequently characterizes many industries which experience rapid growth. In addition, although the Company's Management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular industry or target business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant risk factors.

    Sources of target businesses

The Registrant anticipates that target business candidates will be brought to our attention from various unaffiliated sources, including securities broker-dealers, investment bankers, venture capitalists, bankers and other members of the financial community, who may present solicited or unsolicited proposals. Our Management may also bring to our attention target business candidates. While we do not presently anticipate engaging the services of professional firms that specialize in business acquisitions on any formal basis, we may engage these firms in the future, in which event we may pay a finder's fee or other compensation. In no event, however, will we pay Management any finder's fee or other compensation for services rendered to us prior to or in connection with the consummation of a business combination.

    Selection of a target business and structuring of a business combination

Officers and directors owns 40.62% of the issued and outstanding shares and will have broad flexibility in identifying and selecting a prospective target business. In evaluating a prospective target business, our Management will consider, among other factors, the following:

- financial condition and results of operation of the target company;
- growth potential;
- experience and skill of management and availability of additional personnel;
- capital requirements;
- competitive position;
- stage of development of the products, processes or services;
- degree of current or potential market acceptance of the products, processes or services;
- proprietary features and degree of intellectual property or other protection of the products, processes or services;
- regulatory environment of the industry; and
- costs associated with effecting the business combination.

These criteria are not intended to be exhaustive. Any evaluation relating to the merits of a particular business combination will be based, to the extent relevant, on the above factors as well as other considerations deemed relevant by our Management in effecting a business combination consistent with our business objective. In evaluating a prospective target business, we will conduct a due diligence review which will encompass, among other things, meetings with incumbent management and inspection of facilities, as well as review of financial and other information which will be made available to us.

We will endeavor to structure a business combination so as to achieve the most favorable tax treatment to us, the target business and both companies' stockholders. We cannot assure you, however, that the Internal Revenue Service or appropriate state tax authority will agree with our tax treatment of the business combination.

The time and costs required to select and evaluate a target business and to structure and complete the business combination cannot presently be ascertained with any degree of certainty. Any costs incurred with respect to the identification and evaluation of a prospective target business with which a business combination is not ultimately completed will result in a loss to us.

    Probable lack of business diversification

We may seek to effect business combinations with more than one target business, it is probable that we will have the ability to effect only a single business combination. Accordingly, the prospects for our success may be entirely dependent upon the future performance of a single business. Unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several business combinations of entities operating in multiple industries or multiple areas of a single industry, it is probable that we will not have the resources to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses. By consummating a business combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may:

- subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact upon the particular industry in which we may operate subsequent to a business combination, and
- result in our dependency upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services.

   Limited ability to evaluate the target business' management

Although we intend to closely scrutinize the management of a prospective target business when evaluating the desirability of effecting a business combination, we cannot assure you that our assessment of the target business' management will prove to be correct. In addition, we cannot assure you that the future management will have the necessary skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company intending to embark on a program of business development. Furthermore, the future role of our directors, if any, in the target business cannot presently be stated with any certainty. While it is possible that one or more of our directors will remain associated in some capacity with us following a business combination, it is unlikely that any of them will devote their full efforts to our affairs subsequent to a business combination. Moreover, we cannot assure you that our directors will have significant experience or knowledge relating to the operations of the particular target business.

Following a business combination, we may seek to recruit additional managers to supplement the incumbent management of the target business. We cannot assure you that we will have the ability to recruit additional managers, or that additional managers will have the requisite skills, knowledge or experience necessary to enhance the incumbent management.

Competition

In identifying, evaluating and selecting a target business, we expect to encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours. Many of these entities are well established and have extensive experience identifying and effecting business combinations directly or through affiliates. Many of these competitors possess greater technical, human and other resources than us and our financial resources will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While we believe there are numerous potential target businesses, our ability to compete in acquiring certain sizable target businesses will be limited by our limited financial resources. This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of a target business. Further, any of these obligations may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating a business combination. Our management believes, however, that our status as a public entity and potential access to the United States public equity markets may give us a competitive advantage over privately-held entities having a similar business objective as us in acquiring a target business with significant growth potential on favorable terms.

If we succeed in effecting a business combination, there will be, in all likelihood, intense competition from competitors of the target business. In particular, certain industries which experience rapid growth frequently attract an increasingly larger number of competitors, including competitors with increasingly greater financial, marketing, technical and other resources than the initial competitors in the industry. The degree of competition characterizing the industry of any prospective target business cannot presently be ascertained. We cannot assure you that, subsequent to a business combination, we will have the resources to compete effectively, especially to the extent that the target business is in a high-growth industry.

Employees

Mr. Rubin, our CEO and CFO, is our sole executive officer. Mr. Rubin is not obligated to contribute any specific number of hours per week and intend to devote only as much time as they deem necessary to the Company's affairs. The amount of time they will devote in any time period will vary based on the availability of suitable target businesses to investigate. We do not intend to have any full time employees prior to the consummation of a business combination.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS Back to Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about us, our future performance, the market in which we operate, our beliefs and our management's assumptions. In addition, other written or oral statements that constitute forward-looking statements may be made by us or on our behalf. Words such as "expects", "anticipates", "targets", "goals", "projects", "intends", "plans", "believes", "seeks", "estimates", variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict or assess. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecast in such forward-looking statements.

DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL
The Registrant is dependent upon the continued services of its officers and directors. To the extent that their services become unavailable, the Registrant will be required to obtain other qualified personnel and there can be no assurance that it will be able to recruit and hire qualified persons upon acceptable terms.

LIMITED RESOURCES; NO PRESENT SOURCE OF REVENUES.
At present, we have limited business operations and our business activities are limited to seeking potential business opportunities. Due to our limited financial and personnel resources, there is only a limited basis upon which to evaluate our prospects for achieving our intended business objectives. We have only limited resources and have no operating income, revenues or cash flow from operations. Our Management or a related party is providing us with limited funding, on an as needed basis, necessary for us to continue our corporate existence and our business objective to seek new business opportunities, as well as funding the costs, including professional accounting fees, in order to continue to be a reporting company under the Exchange Act. We have no written agreement with our Management or related parties to provide any interim financing for any period. In addition, we will not generate any revenues unless and until we enter into a new business, of which there can be no assurance.

BROAD DISCRETION OF MANAGEMENT
Any person who invests in our securities will do so without an opportunity to evaluate the specific merits or risks of any potential new prospective business in which we may engage. As a result, investors will be entirely dependent on the broad discretion and judgment of Management in connection with the selection of a prospective business. There can be no assurance that determinations made by our Management will permit us to achieve our business objectives.

ABSENCE OF SUBSTANTIVE DISCLOSURE RELATING TO PROSPECTIVE BUSINESS
We have not yet identified any prospective business or industry in which we may seek to become involved and at present we have no information concerning any prospective business. There can be no assurance that any prospective business opportunity will benefit shareholders or prove to be more favorable to shareholders than any other investment that may be made by shareholders and investors.

THERE IS NO LIQUID MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK AND NONE MAY DEVELOP OR BE SUSTAINED
The Registrant's common stock is subject to quotation on the NASDAQ Bulletin Board under the symbol PGID. There is currently no liquid trading market in our common stock. There can be no assurance that there will be a liquid trading market for our common stock following commencement of a new business. In the event that a liquid trading market commences, there can be no assurance as to the market price of our shares of common stock, whether any trading market will provide sufficient liquidity to investors, or whether any trading market will be sustained.

UNSPECIFIED INDUSTRY FOR NEW PROSPECTIVE BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES; UNASCERTAINABLE RISKS
There is no basis for shareholders to evaluate the possible merits or risks of potential new business opportunities or the particular industry in which we may ultimately operate. To the extent that we effect a business combination with a financially unstable entity or an entity that is in its early stage of development or growth, including entities without established records of revenues or income, we will become subject to numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of that financially unstable company. In addition, to the extent that we effect a business combination with an entity in an industry characterized by a high degree of risk, we will become subject to the currently unascertainable risks of that industry. A high level of risk frequently characterizes certain industries that experience rapid growth. Although Management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular new prospective business or industry, there can be no assurance that we will properly ascertain or assess all such risks or that subsequent events may not alter the risks that we perceive at the time of the consummation of any new business opportunity.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Our Management is not required to commit their full time to our affairs. There may be a conflict of interest in allocating their time in the event that Management engages in similar business efforts for other entities. Our Management will devote such time, in their sole discretion, to conduct our business, including the evaluation of potential new business opportunities. As a result, the amount of time devoted to our business and affairs may vary significantly depending upon whether we have identified a new prospective business opportunity or are engaged in active negotiations related to a new business. In the event that a conflict of interest shall arise, Management will consider factors such as availability of audited financial statements, current capitalization and the laws of jurisdictions. If several business opportunities or operating entities approach Management with respect to a business combination, Management will consider the foregoing factors as well as the preferences of the Management. However, Management will act in what they believe will be in the best interests of the shareholders of the Registrant. The Registrant shall not enter into a transaction with a target business that is affiliated with Management.

COMPETITION
We expect to encounter intense competition from other entities seeking to pursue new business opportunities. Many of these entities are well-established and have extensive experience in identifying new prospective business opportunities. Many of these competitors possess greater financial, technical, human and other resources than we do and there can be no assurance that we will have the ability to compete successfully. Based upon our limited financial and personnel resources, we may lack the resources as compared to those of many of our potential competitors.

ADDITIONAL FINANCING REQUIREMENTS
We have no revenues and are dependent upon the willingness of Management or related parties to fund the costs associated with the reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, and other administrative costs associated with our corporate existence. As of the date of this filing, the Registrant has paid for general and administrative expenses, including accounting fees, reinstatement fees, and other professional fees related to the preparation and filing of reports under the Exchange Act. We may not generate any revenues unless and until the commencement of new business operations. We believe that we will have sufficient funds available to pay accounting and professional fees and other expenses to fulfill our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act until we commence business operations. In the event that our available funds from our Management or affiliates prove to be insufficient, we will be required to seek additional financing. Our failure to secure additional financing could have a material adverse affect on our ability to pay the accounting and other fees in order to continue to fulfill our reporting obligations and pursue our business plan. We do not have any arrangements with any bank or financial institution to secure additional financing and there can be no assurance that any such arrangement would be available on terms acceptable and in our best interests. We do not have any written agreement with our affiliates to provide funds for our operating expenses.

STATE BLUE SKY REGISTRATION; POTENTIAL LIMITATIONS ON RESALE OF THE SECURITIES
The holders of our shares of common stock and those persons who desire to purchase them in any trading market that might develop, should be aware that there may be state blue-sky law restrictions upon the ability of investors to resell our securities. Accordingly, investors should consider the secondary market for the Registrant's securities to be a limited one.

It is the present intention of the Registrant's management after the commencement of new business operations to seek coverage and publication of information regarding the Registrant in an accepted publication manual which permits a manual exemption. The manual exemption permits a security to be distributed in a particular state without being registered if the Registrant issuing the security has a listing for that security in a securities manual recognized by the state. However, it is not enough for the security to be listed in a recognized manual. The listing entry must contain (1) the names of issuer's officers, and directors, (2) an issuer's balance sheet, and (3) a profit and loss statement for either the fiscal year preceding the balance sheet or for the most recent fiscal year of operations. Furthermore, the manual exemption is a nonissuer exemption restricted to secondary trading transactions, making it unavailable for issuers selling newly issued securities.

Most of the accepted manuals are those published in Standard and Poor's, Moody's Investor Service, Fitch's Investment Service, and Best's Insurance Reports, and many states expressly recognize these manuals. A smaller number of states declare that they "recognize securities manuals" but do not specify the recognized manuals. The following states do not have any provisions and therefore do not expressly recognize the manual exemption: Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Montana, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont and Wisconsin.

DIVIDENDS UNLIKELY
We do not expect to pay dividends for the foreseeable future because we have no revenues. The payment of dividends will be contingent upon our future revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and overall financial condition. The payment of any future dividends will be within the discretion of our board of directors. It is our expectation that after the commencement of new business operations that future management will determine to retain any earnings for use in business operations and accordingly, we do not anticipate declaring any dividends in the foreseeable future.

POSSIBLE ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL SECURITIES
Our Articles of Incorporation, as amended, authorize the issuance of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001. As of June 30, 2009, we had 524,200 shares issued and outstanding. We may be expected to issue additional shares in connection with our pursuit of new business opportunities and new business operations. To the extent that additional shares of common stock are issued, our shareholders would experience dilution of their respective ownership interests. If we issue shares of common stock in connection with our intent to pursue new business opportunities, a change in control of the Registrant may be expected to occur. The issuance of additional shares of common stock may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, in the event that an active trading market commences. 

COMPLIANCE WITH PENNY STOCK RULES
Our securities will be considered a "penny stock" as defined in the Exchange Act and the rules thereunder, unless the price of our shares of common stock is at least $5.00. We expect that our share price will be less than $5.00. Unless our common stock is otherwise excluded from the definition of "penny stock", the penny stock rules apply. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its sales person in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. In addition, the penny stock rules require that the broker-dealer, not otherwise exempt from such rules, must make a special written determination that the penny stock is suitable for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure rules have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for a stock that becomes subject to the penny stock rules. So long as the common stock is subject to the penny stock rules, it may become more difficult to sell such securities. Such requirements could limit the level of trading activity for our common stock and could make it more difficult for investors to sell our common stock.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS Back to Table of Contents

As of the filing of this annual report on Form 10-K, there were no material unresolved comments from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES Back to Table of Contents

The Registrant's corporate office is located at 40 Wall Street, 28th Floor, New York, NY 10005. The office facilities consist of approximately 300 square feet of executive office space and are leased from a related party. The Registrant believes that the office facilities are sufficient for the foreseeable future and this arrangement will remain until we find a new business opportunity or consummate a business combination.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDING Back to Table of Contents

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS Back to Table of Contents

None.



PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTER Back to Table of Contents

(a) Market Price Information
Our common stock is currently quoted on the NASD Bulletin Board under the symbol PGID, an NASD-sponsored and operated inter-dealer automated quotation system for equity securities not included on The Nasdaq Stock Market. Quotation of the Company's securities on the NASD Bulletin Board limits the liquidity and price of the Company's common stock more than if the Company's shares of common stock were listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market or a national exchange. For the periods indicated, the following table sets forth the high and low bid prices per share of common stock. The below prices represent inter-dealer quotations without retail markup, markdown, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Fiscal 2010

Fiscal 2009

Fiscal 2008

High

Low

High

Low

High

Low

First Quarter ended September 30

$

1.01

$

1.01

$

0.10

$

0.05

$

0.30

 

$

0.0001

Second Quarter ended December 31

$

1.01

$

1.01

$

0.05

$

0.03

$

0.10

 

$

0.08

Third Quarter ended March 31

$

0.30

$

0.25

$

0.04

$

0.02

$

0.10

$

0.05

Fourth Quarter ended June 30

$

0.30

$

0.25

$

0.04

$

0.03

$

0.10

$

0.05

(b) As of June 30, 2010, our shares of common stock were held by approximately 180 stockholders of record. The transfer agent of our common stock is Pacific Stock Transfer.

(c) Dividends
We currently do not pay cash dividends on our common stock and have no plans to reinstate a dividend on our common stock.

(d) Sale of Unregistered Securities
The Registrant has not issued any restricted shares of common stock during the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2010.

(e) Equity Compensation Plans
We have no equity compensation plans.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA Back to Table of Contents

Operating Results Data: 2010 2009
   Revenues $ 0 $ 0
   Net loss (71,725) (54,300)
   Net loss per basic common shareholder (0.14) (0.10)
   Basic weighted average common shares 524,200 524,200
 
Financial Position Data:
   Total assets 0 0
   Total liabilities 236,851 165,126
   Stockholders' equity (deficiency) (236,851) (165,126)

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND PLAN OF OPERATION Back to Table of Contents

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use of words such as "anticipate", "estimate", "expect", "project", "intend", "plan", "believe", and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. From time to time, we also may provide forward-looking statements in other materials we release to the public.

Overview
Our current activities are related to seeking a new business opportunities. We will use our limited personnel and financial resources in connection with such activities. It may be expected that pursuing a new business opportunity will involve the issuance of restricted shares of common stock. On June 30, 20
10, we had no cash assets and the Company had current liabilities of $41,851. We incurred $68,800 in general and administrative expenses during the year 2010 compared to $54,300 during 2009.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

While we are dependent upon interim funding provided by such related party or by management to pay professional fees and expenses, we have no written finance agreement with management to provide any continued funding. Through the date of this filing, a related party and/or management provided funding for our plan of operation which funds were used for general administrative expenses and accounting fees.

As part of our intent to seek new business opportunities, we may determine to seek to raise funds from the sale of equity or debt securities.We have no agreements to issue any debt or equity securities and cannot predict whether equity or debt financing will become available at terms acceptable to us, if at all.

We anticipate that in connection with the commencement of a new business opportunity or consummation of a business combination, we will issue a substantial number of additional restricted shares or other securities. If such additional securities are issued, our shareholders will experience a dilution in their ownership interest in the Company. If a substantial number of shares are issued in connection with a business combination, a change in control may be expected to occur.

There are no limitations in our articles of incorporation on our ability to borrow funds or raise funds through the issuance of restricted common stock to pursue new business opportunities. Our limited resources and lack of operating history may make it difficult to do borrow funds or raise capital. Our inability to borrow funds or raise funds through the issuance of restricted common stock required to facilitate new business opportunities may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and future prospects. To the extent that debt financing ultimately proves to be available, any borrowing will subject us to various risks traditionally associated with indebtedness, including the risks of interest rate fluctuations and insufficiency of cash flow to pay principal and interest.

The Company has only limited capital. Additional financing is necessary for the Company to continue as a going concern. Our independent auditors have qualified our audit opinion for the year ended June 30, 2010 based on going concern.

In view of these matters, realization of a major portion of the assets in the accompanying balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company. Management believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional equity financing will provide the opportunity to continue as a going concern.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Back to Table of Contents

We have not entered into, and do not expect to enter into, financial instruments for trading or hedging purposes.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Back to Table of Contents

The Registrant's audited financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are attached to this annual report.

Financial Statements

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE Back to Table of Contents

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Back to Table of Contents

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of June 30, 2010, the Company's chief executive officer/chief financial officer conducted an evaluation regarding the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the  Exchange Act. Based upon the evaluation of these controls and procedures, our chief executive officer/chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment of the effectiveness of those internal controls. As defined by the SEC, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by our principal executive officer/principal financial officer, who is also the sole member of our Board of Directors, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment and those criteria, we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2010.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only Management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION Back to Table of Contents

None.



PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Back to Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the names and ages of the members of our Board of Directors and our executive officers and the positions held by each.

Name  

Age

  Title
Richard Rubin  

67

  CEO, CFO and Chairman
Ivo Heiden  

43

  Director

Richard Rubin, 65, CEO, CFO and chairman of the Registrant, has been an officer and a director of the Registrant since March 30, 2004. During the last five years, Mr. Rubin has been engaged in the business of providing corporate securities consulting services and reorganizing distressed public companies. In February 2002, Mr. Rubin also became an secretary and a director of Nettel Holdings, a reporting company and resigned as secretary and director in May 2003. Mr. Rubin served as a director of Jeantex Group, a reporting company from August 2002 to September 2003.

Ivo Heiden, 43, Director of the Registrant, has been a director of the Registrant since December 2009. During the last five years, Mr. Heiden has been engaged in the business of providing corporate securities compliance service and reorganizing distressed public companies. Mr. Heiden was CEO and Chairman of St. Lawrence Energy Corp., a public reporting company, from January 2005 until December 2007. Mr. Heiden served as a director of Jeantex Group, a public reporting company from August 2002 to September 2003. Mr. Heiden is CEO, CFO and Chairman of Zaxis International, Inc., a public reporting company trading on the NASDAQ BB.

Our directors holds office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Officers are appointed by the Board of Directors and each executive officer serves at the discretion of the Board of Directors. We do not have any standing committees at this time. Our director, officer, affiliates or promoters has not, within the past five years, filed any bankruptcy petition, been convicted in or been the subject of any pending criminal proceedings, or is any such person the subject or any order, judgment or decree involving the violation of any state or federal securities laws.

Code of Ethics
The Corporation has adopted a Code of Ethics that are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conduct, full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in the Registrant's SEC reports and other public communications. The Code of Ethics promotes compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations.

Section 16(a) Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Registrant's directors and executive officers, and persons who own beneficially more than ten percent (10%) of the Registrant's Common Stock, to file reports of ownership and changes of ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of all filed reports are required to be furnished to the Registrant pursuant to Section 16(a). Based solely on the reports received by the Registrant and on written representations from reporting persons, the Registrant was informed that its officer and director has filed all reports required under Section 16(a).

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Back to Table of Contents

The following table sets forth information concerning the total compensation that we have paid or that has accrued on behalf of our chief executive officer and other executive officers with annual compensation exceeding $100,000 during the fiscal years ending June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

Long-Term Compensation

Annual Compensation

Awards

Payouts

Name and Principal Position

Year

Salary ($)

Bonus ($)

Other Annual Compensation ($)

Restricted Stock Award(s) ($)

Securities Under-lying Options/ SARs (#)

LTIP Payouts ($)

All other Compensation ($)

Richard Rubin (1)

2010

24,000 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-

2009

24,000 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-

2008

24,000 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
(1) The Registrant's CEO receives annual compensation of $24,000, which compensation has been accrued.

Executive Employment Agreements

To date, we have not entered into any employment agreements with our executive officer.


TEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT Back to Table of Contents

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of June 30, 2009. The information in this table provides the ownership information for: each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock; each of our directors; each of our executive officers; and our executive officers and directors as a group. Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the shares. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to the number of shares indicated as beneficially owned by them.

Name of Beneficial Owner   Common Stock Beneficially Owned (1)   Percentage of Common Stock  Owned (1)
Richard Rubin, CEO and Chairman 110,000 20.98%
40 Wall Street, 28th Floor
New York, NY 10005
 
Thomas J. Craft, Jr. 110,000 20.98%
5420 North Ocean Drive, Suite 1605
Singer Island, FL 33404
 
Ivo Heiden, Director 104,000 19.84%
6399 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1019
Los Angeles, CA 90048
 
Park Avenue Group, Inc. 57,000 10.87%
40 Wall Street, 28th Floor
New York, NY 10005
 
Merrill Yarbrough 87,316 16.65%
2905 Via Napoli
Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (2 persons) 214,000 40.82%

(1) Applicable percentage ownership is based on 524,200 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2010.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE Back to Table of Contents

During the last two fiscal years, to the knowledge of the Registrant, there was no person who had or has a direct or indirect material interest in any transaction or proposed transaction to which the Registrant was or is a party. Transactions in this context relate to any transaction which exceeds $120,000.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES Back to Table of Contents

Independent Public Accountants
The Registrant's Board of Directors has appointed
ABBM Group Ltd LLP as independent public accountant for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 and the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2009 were audited by Michael F. Cronin, CPA.

 

Principal Accounting Fees
The following table presents the fees for professional audit services rendered by
ABBM Group Ltd LLP and Michael F. Cronin, CPA for the audit of the Registrant's annual financial statements for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and fees billed for other services rendered by ABBM Group Ltd LLP and Michael F. Cronin, CPA during those periods.

 

Year Ended 

June 30,  2010 June 30, 2009

Audit fees (1)

$ 4,000    $ 4,000

Audit-related fees (2)

  -      -

All other fees

  -      -
(1) Audit fees consist of audit and review services, consents and review of documents filed with the SEC.
(2) Audit-related fees consist of assistance and discussion concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and other accounting issues.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE Back to Table of Contents

(a) The following documents are filed as exhibits to this report on Form 10-K or incorporated by reference herein. Any document incorporated by reference is identified by a parenthetical reference to the SEC filing that included such document.

Exhibit No.

Description
31.1 Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



SIGNATURES Back to Table of Contents

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

/s/ RICHARD RUBIN
Chief Executive Officer, CFO and Chairman
   Dated:
October 7, 2010

 



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Back to Table of Contents

TO THE DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDER OF PEREGRINE INDUSTRIES, INC:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Peregrine Industries, Inc. (“the Company”) as of June 30, 2010, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Peregrine Industries, Inc at June 30, 2010, and the related results of their operations and cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the financial statements, the Company incurred a loss of $71,725 during the year ended June 30, 2010 and, as of June 30, 2010 the Company’s current liabilities exceeded its current assets by $41,351. These facts raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management plans to fund future operations through additional loans, but has no binding obligation to do so. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

ABBM Group Ltd LLP

Houston, Texas 77060

September 27, 2010


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Back to Table of Contents

Michael F. Cronin
Certified Public Accountant
687 Lee Road

Rochester, NY 14606

Board of Directors and Shareholders
Peregrine Industries, Inc.
New York, NY

I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Peregrine Industries, Inc. (the "Company") as of June 30, 2009 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' deficiency and cash flows for the year then ended. The financial statements are the responsibility of management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.

I conducted my audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor was I engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. My audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, I express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Peregrine Industries, Inc. as of June 30, 2009 and the results of its operations, its cash flows and changes in stockholders' deficiency for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

October 13, 2009

/s/ Michael F. Cronin
Michael F. Cronin

Certified Public Accountant, NY FL

Rochester, NY


Peregrine Industries, Inc.

Balance Sheet

Back to Table of Contents

  
Fiscal Year Ended Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2010 June 30, 2009

ASSETS

Current assets:
   Cash $ 0 $ 0
   Advances to related parties 0 0
     Total current assets 0 0
 
 
        Total Assets $ 0 $ 0
 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

 
Current liabilities:
   Accounts payable-trade $ 22,926 $ 17,126
   Accrued expenses 2,925 -
   Advances due to related party 16,000 148,000
      Total current liabilities 41,851 165,126
 
   Convertible notes, related parties 195,000 -
Stockholders' deficiency:
   Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 5,000,000 authorized, none issued - -
   Common stock, $.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;
     504,200 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010 and 2009 52 52
   Additional paid in capital 157,832 157,832
   Accumulated deficit (394,735) (323,010)
     Stockholders' deficiency (236,851) (165,126)
       Total Liabilities and Stockholders' deficiency $ 0

$

0
 
See Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Financial Statements.


Peregrine Industries, Inc.
Statement of Operations

Back to Table of Contents

 
Fiscal Year Ended Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2010 June 30, 2009
Revenue $ 0 $ 0
Costs and Expenses:
   General and administrative 68,800 54,300
  Interest expenses 2,925 -
Total costs and expenses 71,725 54,300
 
Loss before income taxes (71,725) (54,300)
Income taxes 0 0
Loss from operations (71,725) (54,300)
  
Net loss $ (71,725) $ (54,300)
 
Per share amounts:
   Basic and diluted net loss $ (0.14) $ (0.10)
  
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic and diluted) 524,200 524,200
 
See Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Financial Statements.


Peregrine Industries, Inc.

Statement of Stockholders' Equity

Back to Table of Contents

 
Common
Common Additional
Stock Paid-In

Accumulated

Shares

Amount

Capital

Deficit

Balance at June 30, 2007 504,200

$

50

137,834

(198,410)
   Conversion of amounts due to related party 20,000 2 19,998  
   Net loss       (70,300)
Balance at June 30, 2008 504,200

$

50

157,832

(268,710)
   Net loss       (54,300)
Balance at June 30, 2009 504,200

$

50

157,832

(268,710)
   Net loss       (71,725)
Balance at June 30, 2010 524,200 $ 52 $ 157,832 $ (394,735)
 
See Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Financial Statements.


Peregrine Industries, Inc.

Statement of Cash Flows

Back to Table of Contents

 
  Fiscal Year Ended Fiscal Year Ended
  June 30, 2010 June 30, 2009
 
Cash flows from operating activities: $ (71,725) $ (54,300)
Net loss
Adjustments required to reconcile net loss
  to cash used in operating activities:
   Fair value of services provided by related parties 63,000 48,000
   Expenses paid by related parties - 2,500
   Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses 8,725 3,800
     Cash flows used by operating activities 0 0
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
   Purchase of equipment 0 0
     Cash used in investing activities 0 0
  
Cash flows from financing activities:
   Proceeds from issuance of common stock 0 0
   Cash advances from related parties 0 0
     Cash generated by financing activities 0 0
 
Change in cash
Cash - Beginning of period 0 0
Cash - End of period $ 0 $ 0
 
See Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Financial Statements.


PEREGRINE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Background and
Significant Accounting Policies

June 30, 2010
Back to Table of Contents

The Company

Peregrine Industries, Inc. (the "Company") was formed on October 1, 1995 for the purpose of manufacturing residential pool heaters. The Company was formerly located in Deerfield Beach, Florida. Products were primarily sold throughout the United States, Canada, and Brazil. In September 1998, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Alcool, Inc., in Montgomery, Alabama, in order to expand its manufacturing capacity and product line. Canadian operations were conducted through a wholly owned subsidiary Thermopompe Peregrine Heat Pump, a Quebec corporation.

Bankruptcy Proceedings

On June 4, 2002, the Company filed a petition for Relief and Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida (case no. 02-24188). On September 4, 2002, the bankruptcy proceedings were converted to Chapter 7 for liquidation of the Company’s business. As a result of the conversion of the Company's reorganization to a case under Chapter 7, all of our properties were transferred to a United States Trustee and we terminated all of our business operations. The Bankruptcy Trustee has disposed of all of the assets.

Shell Entity

On March 29, 2004, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court confirmed the sale of the Peregrine corporate shell entity. The accounts of the former subsidiaries were not included in the sale and have not been carried forward. We are a public shell company, defined as an inactive, publicly-quoted company with only nominal assets and liabilities.

Basis of Presentation:

We adopted "fresh-start" accounting as of September 5, 2002 in accordance with procedures specified by AICPA Statement of Position ("SOP") No. 90-7, "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code.

Significant Accounting Policies:

Use of Estimates : The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statement and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents : For financial statement presentation purposes, the Company considers those short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash or cash equivalents.

Property and Equipment New property and equipment are recorded at cost. Property and equipment included in the bankruptcy proceedings and transferred to the Trustee had been valued at liquidation value. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally 5 years. Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized. Expenditures for minor items, repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred. Gain or loss upon sale or retirement due to obsolescence is reflected in the operating results in the period the event takes place.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets : We review the recoverability of our long-lived assets including equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets, when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based on our ability to recover the carrying value of the asset from the expected future pre-tax cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) of the related operations. If these cash flows are less than the carrying value of such asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair value and carrying value. Our primary measure of fair value is based on discounted cash flows. The measurement of impairment requires management to make estimates of these cash flows related to long-lived assets, as well as other fair value determinations.

Stock Based Compensation: Stock-based awards to non-employees are accounted for using the fair value method in accordance with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation , and EITF Issue No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services . All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the third-party performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

On January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”), which requires that companies measure and recognize compensation expense at an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments granted under compensation arrangements. Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for our stock-based compensation plans under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations, and would typically recognize no compensation expense for stock option grants if options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

We adopted SFAS 123(R) using the “modified prospective” method, which results in no restatement of prior period amounts. Under this method, the provisions of SFAS 123(R) apply to all awards granted or modified after the date of adoption. In addition, compensation expense must be recognized for any unvested stock option awards outstanding as of the date of adoption on a straight-line basis over the remaining vesting period. We calculate the fair value of options using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. We do not currently have any outstanding options therefore no charge is required for the year ended June 30, 2008. SFAS 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense to be reported in the Statement of Cash Flows as a financing cash inflow rather than an operating cash inflow. In addition, SFAS 123(R) required a modification to the Company’s calculation of the dilutive effect of stock option awards on earnings per share. For companies that adopt SFAS 123(R) using the “modified prospective” method, disclosure of pro forma information for periods prior to adoption must continue to be made.

Fair Value Accounting: On July 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,  Fair Value Measurements  (“SFAS 157”) (as amended by FSP No. 157-2), which defines fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements.  SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, and has been partially deferred for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), until our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The partial adoption of SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In addition, on July 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159,  The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities  (“SFAS 159”).  Under SFAS 159, companies may elect to measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  The standard requires that unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected be reported in earnings.  We did not elect to use the fair value option.  Therefore, the adoption of SFAS 159 did not impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments : Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments," requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments. Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2009. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values.

These financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for these financial instruments since they are short-term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values or they are receivable or payable on demand.

Earnings per Common Share : Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common and dilutive equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive common equivalent shares consist of options to purchase common stock (only if those options are exercisable and at prices below the average share price for the period) and shares issueable upon the conversion of our Preferred Stock. Due to the net losses reported, dilutive common equivalent shares were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, as inclusion would be anti-dilutive for the periods presented. We consummated a 1:100 reverse split on December 27, 2007 effective January 12, 2008. All per share disclosures retroactively reflect shares outstanding or issuable as though the reverse split had occurred July 1, 2006.

There were no common equivalent shares required to be added to the basic weighted average shares outstanding to arrive at diluted weighted average shares outstanding in 2010 or 2009.

Income Taxes: The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," ("SFAS 109") which requires recognition of estimated income taxes payable or refundable on income tax returns for the current year and for the estimated future tax effect attributable to temporary differences and carry-forwards. Measurement of deferred income tax is based on enacted tax laws including tax rates, with the measurement of deferred income tax assets being reduced by available tax benefits not expected to be realized.

In 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires that the Company recognize in its financial statements the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on July 1, 2007.

Management of the Company is not aware of any additional needed liability for unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009.

Accounting For Obligations And Instruments Potentially To Be Settled In The Company’s Own Stock : We account for obligations and instruments potentially to be settled in the Company’s stock in accordance with EITF Issue No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed To, and Potentially Settled In a Company’s Own Stock . This issue addresses the initial balance sheet classification and measurement of contracts that are indexed to, and potentially settled in, the Company’s own stock.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” (“SFAS 167”). SFAS 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” to require an enterprise to qualitatively assess the determination of the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (VIE) based on whether the entity (1) has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (2) has the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Also, SFAS 167 requires an ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary, and amends the events that trigger a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE. Enhanced disclosures are also required to provide information about an enterprise’s involvement in a VIE. This statement shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 167 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. When effective, the Codification will supersede all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. Following SFAS 168, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve only to: (a) update the Codification; (b) provide background information about the guidance; and (c) provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. SFAS 168 and the Codification are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company has evaluated this new statement and has determined that it will not have a significant impact on the determination or reporting of its financial results.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events ("SFAS 165"). SFAS 165 establishes guidance related to accounting for and disclosure of events that happen after the date of the balance sheet but before the release of the financial statements. SFAS 165 is effective for reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted SFAS 165 on June 30, 2009. SFAS 165 affects disclosures only .

Management does not anticipate that the adoption of these standards will have a material impact on the financial statements.

Peregrine Industries, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2010

1. “Fresh Start” Accounting:

On September 4, 2002 all assets were transferred to the chapter 7 trustee in settlement of all outstanding corporate obligations. We adopted "fresh-start" accounting as of September 5, 2002 in accordance with procedures specified by AICPA Statement of Position ("SOP") No. 90-7, "Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code."

On March 29, 2004, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida confirmed the order previously granted on March 15, 2004 for the sale of Peregrine as a shell entity. All results for periods including and subsequent to September 5, 2002 are referred to as those of the "Successor Company".

In accordance with SOP No. 90-7, the reorganized value of the Company was allocated to the Company's assets based on procedures specified by SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations". Each liability existing at the plan sale date, other than deferred taxes, was stated at the present value of the amounts to be paid at appropriate market rates. It was determined that the Company's reorganization value computed immediately before September 5, 2002 was $0. We adopted "fresh-start" accounting because holders of existing voting shares immediately before filing and confirmation of the sale received less than 50% of the voting shares of the emerging entity and its reorganization value is less than its post-petition liabilities and allowed claims.

2. Income Taxes:

The Company has a net operating loss carryovers available to reduce future income taxes. We have adopted SFAS 109 which provides for the recognition of a deferred tax asset based upon the value the loss carry-forwards will have to reduce future income taxes and management's estimate of the probability of the realization of these tax benefits. We have determined it more likely than not that our net operating loss carry-forwards will not be utilized. Utilization of federal and state NOL and tax credit carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and similar state provisions. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of NOL and tax credit carryforwards before full utilization. The Company is not under examination by any jurisdiction for any tax year. At June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, the Company had no material unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were required under FIN 48.

3. Commitments:

The Company, prior to its bankruptcy, was a party to numerous lawsuits and claims. As a result of the bankruptcy and the subsequent transfer by the Bankruptcy Trustee of the Company’s corporate shell entity free of all liens, claims and encumbrances pursuant to Section 363(f) of the US Bankruptcy Code, the Company is no longer party to any litigation.

The Company is not a party to any leases and does not have any commitments

4. Stockholders' Equity:

Reverse Stock Split

On December 27, 2007, the Company’s board of directors declared and authorized red a reverse split of our common stock. The formula provided that every one hundred (100) issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company be automatically split into 1 share of common stock. Any resulting share ownership interest of fractional shares was rounded up to the first whole integer in such a manner that all rounding was done to the next single share and each and every shareholder would own at least 1 share. The reverse stock split was effective January 12, 2008 for holders of record at January 12, 2008. Except as otherwise noted, all share, option and warrant numbers have been restated to give retroactive effect to this reverse split. All per share disclosures retroactively reflect shares outstanding or issuable as though the reverse split had occurred July 1, 2006.

Common Stock

In January, 2008, we issued 20,000 shares of common stock to Park Avenue Group as partial payment of services provided to our company to meet ongoing reporting and compliance obligations. The shares were valued at $1.00 per share for a total of $20,000 and are restricted as to transferability. All issued shares of common stock are entitled to vote on a 1 share/1 vote basis.

Preferred Stock

The articles of incorporation were amended in September, 1998 to authorize the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $.0001 per share.

Stock Based Compensation

There were no grants of employee or non-employee stock or options in either fiscal period ended June 30, 2010 or 2009.

5. Convertible Note to Related Party:

In April 2010, we issued one convertible promissory note in the amount of $97,500 to our President and one convertible promissory note in the amount of $97,500 to a director. The note bear interests at 12% per annum until paid or converted. Interest is payable upon the maturity date (June 30, 2011). The initial conversion rate is $0.10 per share (subject to standard anti-dilution provisions). The note formalized a like amount due through the accretion of cash advances and the fair value of services provided without cost covering several years.

The convertible debt securities were issued with a non-detachable conversion feature. We evaluate and account for such securities in accordance with EITF Issue Nos. 98-5, 00-19, 00-27, 05-02, 05-04 and 05-08, and SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities as amended.

In accordance SFAS No. 133, we evaluate that the holder’s conversion right provision, interest rate adjustment provision, liquidated damages clause, cash premium option (if applicable), and the redemption option (collectively, the debt features) contained in the terms governing the Note to determine whether they are or are not clearly and closely related to the characteristics of the Note. Accordingly, if the features qualify as embedded derivative instruments at issuance and, furthermore if they do or do not qualify for any scope exception within SFAS No. 133 (paragraphs 12-32), then they are required by SFAS No. 133 to be accounted for separately from the debt instrument and recorded as derivative financial instruments.

The values ascribed to the note, the conversion feature of the note, other potential embedded derivative features, and common stock follow the guidance of EITF Issue No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock ; SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity ; and EITF Issue No. 00-27, Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments . The Company considered the embedded conversion feature and its effect based on EITF Issue No. 00-19. In accordance with EITF Issue No. 00-19, a transaction which includes a potential for net-cash settlement, including liquidated damages, requires that derivative financial instruments, including warrants and the embedded conversion feature, be bifurcated, and initially recorded at fair value as an asset or liability and subsequent changes in fair value be reflected in the statement of operations.

In accordance with the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 98-5 “Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios” and EITF Issue No. 00-27 “Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments,” because the effective conversion price exceeds the stock price on the valuation date, we determined that the convertible notes did not contains an embedded beneficial conversion feature.

6. Related Party Transactions not Disclosed Elsewhere:

Fair value of services:

The President provided, without cost to the Company, his services and use of office space & equipment collectively, valued at $3,000 per month. The total of these expenses was $36,000 for the year 2010 and was reflected in the statement of operations as general and administrative expenses.

The Company’s non-executive director who was appointed to the board of directors on December 7, 2009, is entitled to receive compensation of $1,000 per month for a total of $3,000 during year ended June 30, 2010.

An entity affiliated by common management to the Company provided securities compliance services related to SEC filing services valued at $24,000 during 2010 and $12,000 during 2009. This amount was also reflected in the statement of operations as general and administrative expenses.

Due Related Parties:

Amounts due related parties consist of:

- Expenses incurred in meeting ongoing disclosure and reporting requirements paid directly by principal shareholders and officers
- the fair value of services of management provided without cost
- and the fair value of services provided by an entity affiliated by common management

Such items due totaled $211,000 at June 30, 2010 and $148,000 at June 30, 2009, or an increase of $63,000 compared to June 30, 2009.

7. Going Concern

The Company's financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. Since adopting "fresh-start" accounting as of September 5, 2002, the Company has accumulated losses aggregating to $394,735 and has insufficient working capital to meet operating needs for the next twelve months as of June 30, 2010, all of which raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.