Attached files

file filename
EX-21 - SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES - WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPdex21.htm
EX-31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION FOR THE CEO - WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPdex311.htm
EX-32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION FOR THE CEO AND CFO - WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPdex321.htm
EX-31.2 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION FOR THE CFO - WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPdex312.htm
EX-23.1 - CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP - WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPdex231.htm
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

 

 

 

x Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

OR

 

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 1-13782

 

 

WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   25-1615902

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

 

1001 Air Brake Avenue

Wilmerding, Pennsylvania 15148

  (412) 825-1000
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)   (Registrant’s telephone number)

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Class

 

Name of Exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $.01 per share   New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files)    Yes  ¨    No  ¨.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  x    Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  ¨    Smaller reporting company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x.

The registrant estimates that as of June 30, 2009, the aggregate market value of the voting shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1.4 billion based on the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange for such stock.

As of February 22, 2010, 47,619,699 shares of Common Stock of the registrant were issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the registrant’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 12, 2010 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

         

Page

   PART I   
Item 1.    Business    3
Item 1A.    Risk Factors    11
Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments    16
Item 2.    Properties    17
Item 3.    Legal Proceedings    18
Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders    18
   Executive Officers of the Registrant   

19

   PART II   
Item 5.   

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   20
Item 6.    Selected Financial Data    22
Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    23
Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk    37
Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data    38
Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure    38
Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures    38
Item 9B.    Other Information   

39

   PART III   
Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance    40
Item 11.    Executive Compensation    40
Item 12.   

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

   40
Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence    40
Item 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services    40
   PART IV   
Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules    41

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I

 

Item 1. BUSINESS

General

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation, doing business as Wabtec Corporation, is a Delaware corporation with headquarters at 1001 Air Brake Avenue in Wilmerding, Pennsylvania. Our telephone number is 412-825-1000, and our website is located at www.wabtec.com. All references to “we”, “our”, “us”, the “Company” and “Wabtec” refer to Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and its subsidiaries. Westinghouse Air Brake Company (“WABCO”) was formed in 1990 when it acquired certain assets and operations from American Standard, Inc., now known as Trane (“Trane”). In 1999, WABCO merged with MotivePower Industries, Inc. (“MotivePower”) and adopted the name Wabtec.

Today, Wabtec is one of the world’s largest providers of value-added, technology-based equipment and services for the global rail industry. We believe we hold approximately a 50% market share in North America for our primary braking-related equipment and a leading position in North America for most of our other product lines. Our highly engineered products, which are intended to enhance safety, improve productivity and reduce maintenance costs for customers, can be found on virtually all U.S. locomotives, freight cars, subway cars and buses. In 2009, the Company had sales of about $1.4 billion and net income of about $115.1 million. In 2009 sales of aftermarket parts and services represented about 54% of total sales, while sales to customers outside of the U.S. accounted for about 40% of total sales.

Industry Overview

The Company primarily serves the worldwide freight rail and passenger transit industries. As such, our operating results are largely dependent on the level of activity, financial condition and capital spending plans of the global railroad and transit industries. Many factors influence these industries, including general economic conditions; rail traffic, as measured by freight tonnage and passenger ridership; government spending on public transportation; and investment in new technologies by freight rail and passenger transit systems.

According to a 2008 study by UNIFE, the Association of the European Rail Industry, the global market for railway products and services is more than $100.0 billion. The three largest markets, which represent about 85% of the total market, are Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific. Over the next decade, Asia-Pacific is expected to be the fastest-growing region and to surpass the North American market.

In North America, railroads carry about 43% of intercity freight, as measured by ton-miles, which is more than any other mode of transportation. They are an integral part of the continent’s economy and transportation system, serving nearly every industrial, wholesale and retail sector. Through direct ownership and operating partnerships, U.S. railroads are part of an integrated network that includes railroads in Canada and Mexico, forming what is regarded as the world’s most-efficient and lowest-cost freight rail service. There are more than 500 railroads operating in North America, with the largest railroads, referred to as “Class I,” accounting for more than 90% of the industry’s revenues. Although the railroads carry a wide variety of commodities and goods, coal is the single-largest item, representing about 40% of carloadings in 2009. Intermodal traffic—the movement of trailers or containers by rail in combination with another mode of transportation—has been the railroads’ fastest-growing market segment in the past 10 years. Railroads operate in a competitive environment, especially with the trucking industry, and are always seeking ways to improve safety, cost and reliability. New technologies offered by Wabtec and others in the industry can provide some of these benefits.

Demand for our freight related products and services in North America are driven by a number of factors, including:

 

   

Rail traffic. The Association of American Railroads (AAR) compiles statistics that gauge the level of activity in the freight rail industry. Two important statistics are revenue ton-miles and

 

3


Table of Contents
 

carloadings, which are generally referred to as “rail traffic”. In 2009, revenue ton-miles decreased 15.1% and carloadings decreased 16.1% as rail traffic was negatively impacted by the economic recession in the U.S. Although rail traffic was down for the year, revenue ton-miles increased 6% and carloadings increased 3% in the second half of the year, compared to the first half of the year, reflecting some improvement in the overall economy.

 

   

Demand for new locomotives. Currently, the active locomotive fleet for Class I railroads in North America is about 24,000 units. The average number of new locomotives delivered over the past 10 years was about 1,100 annually. In 2009, about 700 new, heavy-haul locomotives were delivered, compared to about 1,500 in 2008.

 

   

Demand for new freight cars. Currently, the active freight car fleet in North America is about 1.4 million. The average number of new freight cars delivered over the past 10 years was about 47,000 annually. In 2009, about 21,000 new freight cars were delivered, compared to about 60,000 cars in 2008.

In the U.S., the passenger transit industry is dependent largely on funding from federal, state and local governments, and from fare box revenues. With about 40% of the nation’s passenger transit vehicles, the New York City region is the largest passenger transit market in the U.S., but most major cities also offer either rail or bus transit services.

Demand for North American passenger transit products is driven by a number of factors, including:

 

   

Government funding. The U.S. federal government provides money to local transit authorities, primarily to fund the purchase of new equipment and infrastructure for their transit systems. Under a multi-year spending bill known as SAFETEA-LU, federal government funding has increased on average by 6-8% annually since 2005. Due in part to this increased government funding, the number of cars delivered in 2009 remained well above the ten year average, at about 1,300, compared to 1,569 in 2008; and the number of new buses delivered in 2009 increased to about 5,800, compared to about 5,100 in 2008. In the past 10 years, the average number of new transit cars delivered is about 600, and the average number of new buses delivered is about 4,800. SAFETEA-LU expired in September 2009 but funding has been maintained at current levels until a new bill is completed. In February 2009, the U.S. federal government passed additional spending legislation designed to stimulate the U.S. economy. Of the $789 billion spending package, up to $20 billion is to be spent on freight and passenger transportation, as follows: $8.4 billion for public transportation, $8.0 billion for high-speed rail, $1.5 billion for discretionary intermodal projects, and $1.3 billion for AMTRAK. Wabtec expects to benefit from this additional spending, as transit authorities invest in expansion, new equipment and other related projects.

 

   

Ridership. Ridership provides fare box revenues to transit authorities, which use these funds, along with state and local money, primarily for equipment and system maintenance. Based on preliminary figures from the American Public Transportation Association, ridership on U.S. transit vehicles decreased about 4% in 2009, mainly due to the economic recession. Prior to 2009, ridership had increased for six consecutive years.

Outside of North America, many of the rail systems have historically been focused on passenger transit, rather than freight. In recent years, however, railroads in countries such as Australia, India and China have been investing capital to expand and improve both their freight and passenger rail systems. Throughout the world, some government-owned railroads are being sold to private owners, who often look to improve the efficiency of the rail system by investing in new equipment and new technologies. These investment programs represent opportunities for Wabtec to provide products and services.

In Europe, the majority of the rail system serves the passenger transit market, which is expected to continue growing as high fuel costs and environmental factors encourage investment in public mass transit. France,

 

4


Table of Contents

Germany, the United Kingdom and Italy are the largest transit markets, representing about two-thirds of passenger traffic in the European Union. About 75% of freight traffic in Europe is hauled by truck, while rail accounts for about 20%. The largest freight markets in Europe are Germany, Poland and the United Kingdom. According to UNIFE, the European market consists of about 33,000 locomotives, about 700,000 freight cars and about 150,000 passenger transit cars. In recent years, the European market purchased on average about 1,300 new locomotives, about 1,000 new freight cars and about 7,500 new passenger transit cars annually.

The Asia/Pacific market is expected to be the second-largest geographic segment by 2016, according to the UNIFE study. Growth is expected to be driven by the continued urbanization of countries such as China and India, and by investment in freight rail infrastructure to serve the mining and natural resources markets in those countries, as well as in Australia. According to UNIFE, this market consists of about 34,000 locomotives and about 1.0 million freight cars. In recent years, China has embarked on a major rail capital investment program, and is expected to spend a record amount of about $120 billion in 2010.

Business Segments and Products

We provide our products and services through two principal business segments, the Freight Group and the Transit Group, both of which have different market characteristics and business drivers.

The Freight Group primarily manufactures and services components for new and existing freight cars and locomotives, builds new switcher locomotives, rebuilds freight locomotives and provides related heat exchange and cooling systems. Customers include large, publicly traded railroads, leasing companies, manufacturers of original equipment such as locomotives and freight cars and utilities. As discussed previously, demand in the freight market is primarily driven by rail traffic, and deliveries of new locomotives and freight cars. In 2009, the Freight Group accounted for 42% of our total sales, with about two-thirds of its sales in North America and the remainder to International customers. About two-thirds of the Freight Group’s sales are in the aftermarket and the remainder in the original equipment market.

The Transit Group primarily manufactures and services components for new and existing passenger transit vehicles, typically subway cars and buses, builds new commuter locomotives and refurbishes subway cars. Customers include public transit authorities and municipalities, leasing companies and manufacturers of subway cars and buses around the world. As discussed previously, demand in the transit market is primarily driven by government funding at all levels and passenger ridership. In 2009, the Transit Group accounted for 58% of our total sales, with about half of its sales in North America and the remainder to International customers and about half in the aftermarket and half in the original equipment market.

Following is a summary of our leading product lines across both of our business segments:

 

   

Railway braking equipment and related components

 

   

Freight car truck components and undercarriage components

 

   

Draft gears, couplers and slack adjusters

 

   

Air compressors and dryers

 

   

Positive train control equipment and electronically controlled pneumatic braking products

 

   

Railway electronics, including event recorders, monitoring equipment and end of train devices

 

   

Friction products, including brake shoes and pads

 

   

Rail and bus door assemblies

 

   

Accessibility lifts and ramps for buses and subway cars

 

5


Table of Contents
   

Heat exchangers and cooling products for locomotives and power generation equipment

 

   

Commuter and switcher locomotives

 

   

Transit car and locomotive overhauls

We have become a leader in the rail industry by capitalizing on the strength of our existing products, technological capabilities and new product innovation, and by our ability to harden products to protect them from severe conditions, including extreme temperatures and high-vibration environments. Over the past several years, we introduced a number of significant new products including electronic braking equipment and train control equipment that encompasses onboard digital data and global positioning communication protocols. In 2007, for example, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) approved the use of our Electronic Train Management System®, which offers safety benefits to the rail industry. In 2008, the U.S. federal government enacted a rail safety bill that mandates the use of positive train control technology on a majority of the locomotives and track in the U.S. by December 31, 2015. As the only supplier with a train control product that has received FRA approval, Wabtec is working with the railroads and transit authorities to implement this technology. Supported by our technical staff of over 475 engineers and specialists, we have extensive experience in a broad range of product lines, which enables us to provide comprehensive, systems-based solutions for our customers. We currently own over 1,250 active patents worldwide and over 500 U.S. patents. During the last three years, we have filed for more than 350 patents worldwide in support of our new and evolving product lines.

For additional information on our business segments, see Note 20 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.

Competitive Strengths

Our key strengths include:

 

   

Leading market positions in core products. Dating back to 1869 and George Westinghouse’s invention of the air brake; we are an established leader in the development and manufacture of pneumatic braking equipment for freight and passenger transit vehicles. We have leveraged our leading position by focusing on research and engineering to expand beyond pneumatic braking components to supplying integrated parts and assemblies for the locomotive through the end of the train. We are a recognized leader in the development and production of electronic recording, measuring and communications systems, highly engineered compressors and heat exchangers for locomotives and a leading manufacturer of freight car components, including electronic braking equipment, draft gears, trucks, brake shoes and electronic end-of-train devices. We are also the leading manufacturer of commuter locomotives and a leading provider of braking equipment, door assemblies, lifts and ramps, and couplers for passenger transit vehicles.

 

   

Breadth of product offering with a stable mix of original equipment market (OEM) and aftermarket business. Our product portfolio is one of the broadest in the rail industry, as we offer a wide selection of quality parts, components and assemblies across the entire train. We believe this comprehensive product offering enables us to leverage our installed base to maintain our leadership position with OEMs and the Class I railroads. We provide our products in both the original equipment market and the aftermarket. Our substantial installed base of products with end-users such as the railroads and the passenger transit authorities is a significant competitive advantage for providing products and services to the aftermarket because these customers often look to purchase safety and performance-related replacement parts from the original equipment components supplier. In addition, as OEMs and Class I railroad operators attempt to modernize fleets with new products designed to improve and maintain safety and efficiency, these products must be designed to be interoperable with existing equipment. Over the last several years, more than 50% of our total net sales have come from our aftermarket products and services business.

 

6


Table of Contents
   

Leading design and engineering capabilities. We believe a hallmark of our relationship with our customers has been our leading design and engineering practice, which has, in our opinion, assisted in the improvement and modernization of global railway equipment. We believe both our customers and the government authorities value our technological capabilities and commitment to innovation, as we seek not only to enhance the efficiency and profitability of our customers, but also to improve the overall safety of the railways through continuous improvement of product performance. The Company has an established record of product improvements and new product development. We have assembled a wide range of patented products, which we believe provides us with a competitive advantage. Wabtec currently owns over 1,250 active patents worldwide and over 500 U.S. patents. During the last three years, we have filed for more than 350 patents worldwide in support of our new and evolving product lines.

 

   

Experience with industry regulatory requirements. The U.S. rail industry is governed by the AAR and by the FRA. These groups mandate rigorous manufacturer certification and new product testing and approval processes that we believe are difficult for new entrants to meet cost-effectively and efficiently without the scale and extensive experience we possess.

 

   

Experienced management team and the Wabtec Performance System. Our executive management team has over 50 years of combined experience with the Company and has implemented numerous initiatives that enable us to manage successfully through cycles in the rail supply market. For example, the Wabtec Performance System (WPS), an ongoing program that focuses on lean manufacturing principles and continuous improvement across all aspects of our business, has been a part of the company’s culture for more than 20 years. As a result, our management team has improved our cost structure, operating leverage and financial flexibility and placed the Company in an excellent position to benefit from growth opportunities.

Business strategy

Using WPS, we strive to generate sufficient cash to invest in our growth strategies and to build on what we consider to be a leading position as a low-cost producer in the industry while maintaining world-class product quality, technology and customer responsiveness. Through WPS and employee-directed initiatives such as Kaizen, a Japanese-developed team concept, we strive to improve quality, delivery and productivity continuously, and to reduce costs. These efforts enable us to streamline processes, improve product reliability and customer satisfaction, reduce product cycle times and respond more rapidly to market developments. Over time, these lean initiatives have enabled us to increase operating margins, improve cash flow and strengthen our ability to invest in the following growth strategies:

 

   

Expand globally and into new product markets. We believe that international markets represent a significant opportunity for future growth. In 2009, sales to non-U.S. customers were $563.4 million, including export sales from the Company’s U.S. operations of $241.3 million. We intend to increase our existing international sales through strategic acquisitions, direct sales of products through our existing subsidiaries and licensees, and joint ventures with railway suppliers which have a strong presence in their local markets. We are specifically targeting markets that operate significant fleets of U.S.-style locomotives and freight cars, including Australia, China, India, Russia, South Africa, and select areas within Europe and South America. In addition, we have opportunities to sell certain products that we currently manufacture for the rail industry into other industrial markets, such as mining, off-highway and energy. These products include heat exchangers and friction materials.

 

   

Expand aftermarket sales. Historically, aftermarket sales are less cyclical than OEM sales because a certain level of aftermarket maintenance and service work must be performed, even during an industry slowdown. In 2009, Wabtec’s aftermarket sales and services represented approximately 54% of the Company’s total sales. Wabtec provides aftermarket parts and services for its components, and the Company is seeking to expand this business with new customers such as short-line and regional railroads, or with customers who currently perform the work in-house. In this way, we expect to take

 

7


Table of Contents
 

advantage of the rail industry trend toward outsourcing, as railroads and transit authorities focus on their core function of transporting goods and people, rather than maintaining and servicing their equipment.

 

   

Accelerate new product development. We continue to emphasize research and development funding to create new and improved products. We are focusing on technological advances, especially in the areas of electronics, braking products and other on-board equipment, as a means of new product growth. We seek to provide customers with incremental technological advances that offer immediate benefits with cost-effective investments. In 2008, the U.S. federal government enacted a rail safety bill that mandates the use of positive train control technology on a majority of the locomotives and track in the U.S. by December 31, 2015. As the only supplier with a train control product that has received FRA approval, Wabtec is working with the railroads and transit authorities to implement this technology.

 

   

Seek acquisitions, joint ventures and alliances. We are exploring acquisition, joint venture and alliance opportunities using a disciplined, selective approach and rigorous financial criteria. We seek companies that will help Wabtec to grow profitably and expand geographically, while helping to dampen any impact from potential cycles in the North American rail industry. In 2009, Wabtec acquired Unifin, a leading manufacturer of cooling systems and related equipment for the power generation and transmission industry.

Recent Acquisitions and Joint Ventures

Wabtec has completed certain acquisitions in support of its growth strategies. On October 1, 2009, the Company used cash to acquire Unifin International LP, and its affiliate, Cardinal Pumps and Exchangers, Inc. (“Unifin”), a manufacturer of cooling systems and related equipment for the power generation and transmission industry for a net purchase price of $92.9 million.

In December 2008, the Company acquired 100% of the stock of Standard Car Truck Company (“SCT”), for $302.6 million, net of cash. SCT is a manufacturer and designer of stabilization systems for freight cars, including engineered truck (undercarriage) components such as springs, friction wedges and wear plates. Its Barber® brand truck design is used throughout the world and holds a leading share of the North American market. The company also manufactures and services locomotives components, including compressors and pumps. In October 2008, the Company acquired certain assets related to the development, sale, service, and maintenance of software programs used in train management systems for $4.5 million. In June 2008, the Company acquired 100% of the stock of POLI S.p.A. (“POLI”) for €55.2 million ($87.0 million), net of cash received. POLI is a European-based manufacturer of rail braking equipment including brake discs for high-speed applications, as well as tread brake units and pneumatic brake valves that meet International Union of Railways (“UIC”) standards.

In June 2007, the Company acquired 100% of the stock of Ricon Corporation (“Ricon”), a manufacturer of a variety of electro-mechanical wheelchair lifts and ramps and anti-graffiti windows for $73.6 million.

During 2008, Wabtec expanded its presence in key geographic areas. Wabtec acquired the majority of Beijing Wabtec Huaxia Technology Company, Ltd, which manufactures friction products for the freight car market and invested in a joint venture in China to manufacture other braking-related components. In addition, the Company formed a joint venture in South Africa to manufacture friction products.

Backlog

The Company’s backlog was about $951 million at December 31, 2009.

In 2009, about 54% of our sales came from aftermarket orders, which typically carry lead times of less than 30 days, so they are not recorded in backlog for a significant period of time. As such, the Company’s backlog is mostly an indicator of future original equipment sales, primarily for the Transit Group, and not aftermarket sales.

 

8


Table of Contents

The Company’s contracts are subject to standard industry cancellation provisions, including cancellations on short notice or upon completion of designated stages. Substantial scope-of-work adjustments are common. For these and other reasons, completion of the Company’s backlog may be delayed or cancelled. The railroad industry, in general, has historically been subject to fluctuations due to overall economic conditions and the level of use of alternative modes of transportation.

The backlog of firm customer orders as of December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008, and the expected year of completion are as follows:

 

In thousands

   Total
Backlog
12/31/09
   Expected Delivery    Total
Backlog
12/31/08
   Expected Delivery
      2010    Other
Years
      2009    Other
Years

Freight Group

   $ 211,339    $ 126,177    $ 85,162    $ 195,717    $ 148,617    $ 47,100

Transit Group

     739,330      425,517      313,813      865,005      417,014      447,991
                                         

Total

   $ 950,669    $ 551,694    $ 398,975    $ 1,060,722    $ 565,631    $ 495,091
                                         

Engineering and Development

To execute our strategy to develop new products, we invest in a variety of engineering and development activities. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, we invested about $42.4 million, $39.0 million and $37.4 million, respectively, on product development and improvement activities. Sometimes we conduct specific research projects in conjunction with universities, customers and other railroad product suppliers.

Our engineering and development program is largely focused upon train control and new braking technologies, with an emphasis on applying electronics to traditional pneumatic equipment. Electronic braking has been used in the transit industry for years, and freight railroads are beginning to conduct pilot programs to test its reliability and benefits. Freight railroads have generally been slower to accept the technology due to issues over interoperability, connectivity and durability. We are proceeding with efforts to enhance the major components for existing hard-wired braking equipment and development of new electronic technologies for the freight railroads.

We use our Product Development System (PDS) to develop and monitor new product programs. The system requires the product development team to follow consistent steps throughout the development process, from concept to launch, to ensure the product will meet customer expectations and internal profitability targets.

Intellectual Property

We have more than 1,250 active patents worldwide. We also rely on a combination of trade secrets and other intellectual property laws, nondisclosure agreements and other protective measures to establish and protect our proprietary rights in our intellectual property.

Certain trademarks, among them the name WABCO®, were acquired or licensed from American Standard Inc., now known as Trane, in 1990 at the time of our acquisition of the North American operations of the Railway Products Group of Trane. Other trademarks have been developed through the normal course of business, or acquired as a part of our ongoing merger and acquisition program.

We have entered into a variety of license agreements as licensor and licensee. We do not believe that any single license agreement is of material importance to our business or either of our business segments as a whole.

We have issued licenses to the two sole suppliers of railway air brakes and related products in Japan, Nabtesco and Mitsubishi Electric Company. The licensees pay annual license fees to us and also assist us by

 

9


Table of Contents

acting as liaisons with key Japanese passenger transit vehicle builders for projects in North America. We believe that our relationships with these licensees have been beneficial to our core transit business and customer relationships in North America.

Customers

Our customers include railroads and passenger transit authorities throughout North America, as well as in the United Kingdom, Australia, Europe, Asia and South Africa; manufacturers of transportation equipment, such as locomotives, freight cars, subway vehicles and buses and lessors of such equipment.

In 2009, about 40% of our sales were to customers outside the U.S. and to approximately 100 countries throughout the world. About 54% of our sales were in the aftermarket, with a majority of our remaining sales to OEMs of locomotives, freight cars, subway vehicles and buses.

Our top customers can change from year to year. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, our top five customers, Alstom, Metrolinx (formerly GO Transit (“Greater Toronto Transit Authority”), Kawasaki Railcar Inc., GE Transportation Systems and HSBC Rail, accounted for 22% of our net sales. No one customer represents 10% or more of consolidated sales. We believe that we have strong relationships with all of our key customers.

Competition

We believe that we hold approximately a 50% market share in North America for our primary braking-related equipment and a leading market position in North America for most of our other product lines. On a global basis, our market shares are generally much smaller. We operate in a highly competitive marketplace. Price competition is strong because we have a relatively small number of customers and they are very cost-conscious.

In addition to price, competition is based on product performance and technological leadership, quality, reliability of delivery, and customer service and support.

Our principal competitors vary across product lines, but most competitors tend to be privately held companies. Within North America, New York Air Brake Company, a subsidiary of the German air brake producer Knorr-Bremse AG, is our principal overall OEM competitor. Our competition for locomotive, freight and passenger transit service and repair is primarily from the railroads’ and passenger transit authorities’ in-house operations, Electro-Motive Diesel, GE Transportation Systems, and New York Air Brake/Knorr. We believe our key strengths, which include leading market positions in core products, breadth of product offering with a stable mix of OEM and aftermarket business, leading design and engineering capabilities, significant barriers to entry and an experienced management team, enable us to compete effectively in this marketplace.

Employees

At December 31, 2009, we had 5,812 full-time employees, approximately 37% of whom were unionized. A majority of the employees subject to collective bargaining agreements are within North America and these agreements generally extend through 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013. Agreements expiring in 2010 cover approximately 21% of the Company’s workforce. We consider our relations with our employees and union representatives to be good, but cannot assure that future contract negotiations will be favorable to us.

Regulation

In the course of our operations, we are subject to various regulations of agencies and other entities. In the United States, these include principally the FRA and the AAR. The FRA administers and enforces federal laws and regulations relating to railroad safety. These regulations govern equipment and safety standards for freight

 

10


Table of Contents

cars and other rail equipment used in interstate commerce. The AAR oversees a wide variety of rules and regulations governing safety and design of equipment, relationships among railroads with respect to railcars in interchange and other matters. The AAR also certifies railcar builders and component manufacturers that provide equipment for use on railroads in the United States. New products generally must undergo AAR testing and approval processes. As a result of these regulations and those stipulated in other countries in which we derive our revenues, we must maintain certain certifications as a component manufacturer and for products we sell.

Effects of Seasonality

Our business is not typically seasonal, although the third quarter results may be impacted by vacation and plant shutdowns at several of our major customers during this period.

Environmental Matters

Information on environmental matters is included in Note 19 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.

Available Information

We maintain an Internet site at www.wabtec.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as the annual report to stockholders and other information, are available free of charge on this site. The Internet site and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters of our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees, our Code of Conduct, which is applicable to all employees, and our Code of Ethics for Senior Officers, which is applicable to all of our executive officers, are also available free of charge on this site and are available in print to any shareholder who requests them.

 

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Prolonged unfavorable economic and market conditions could adversely affect our business.

Unfavorable general economic and market conditions in the United States and internationally could have a negative impact on our sales and operations. To the extent that these factors result in continued instability of capital markets, shortages of raw materials or component parts, longer sales cycles, deferral or delay of customer orders or an inability to market our products effectively, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We are dependent upon key customers.

We rely on several key customers who represent a significant portion of our business. Our top customers can change from year to year. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, our top five customers, Alstom, Metrolinx (formerly GO Transit (“Greater Toronto Transit Authority”), Kawasaki Railcar Inc., GE Transportation Systems and HSBC Rail, accounted for 22% of our net sales. While we believe our relationships with our customers are generally good, our top customers could choose to reduce or terminate their relationships with us. In addition, many of our customers place orders for products on an as-needed basis and operate in cyclical industries. As a result, their order levels have varied from period to period in the past and may vary significantly in the future. Such customer orders are dependent upon their markets and customers, and may be subject to delays and cancellations. As a result of our dependence on our key customers, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition if we lost any one or more of our key customers or if there is a reduction in their demand for our products.

 

11


Table of Contents

Our business operates in a highly competitive industry.

We operate in a competitive marketplace and face substantial competition from a limited number of established competitors in the United States and abroad, some of which may have greater financial resources than we do. Price competition is strong and, coupled with the existence of a number of cost conscious purchasers, has historically limited our ability to increase prices. In addition to price, competition is based on product performance and technological leadership, quality, reliability of delivery and customer service and support. There can be no assurance that competition in one or more of our markets will not adversely affect us and our results of operations.

We intend to pursue acquisitions, joint ventures and alliances that involve a number of inherent risks, any of which may cause us not to realize anticipated benefits.

One aspect of our business strategy is to selectively pursue acquisitions, joint ventures and alliances that we believe will improve our market position, and provide opportunities to realize operating synergies. These transactions involve inherent risks and uncertainties, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations, including:

 

   

difficulties in achieving identified financial and operating synergies, including the integration of operations, services and products;

 

   

diversion of Management’s attention from other business concerns;

 

   

the assumption of unknown liabilities; and

 

   

unanticipated changes in the market conditions, business and economic factors affecting such an acquisition.

We cannot assure that we will be able to consummate any future acquisitions, joint ventures or other business combinations. If we are unable to identify suitable acquisition candidates or to consummate strategic acquisitions, we may be unable to fully implement our business strategy, and our business and results of operations may be adversely affected as a result. In addition, our ability to engage in strategic acquisitions will be dependent on our ability to raise substantial capital, and we may not be able to raise the funds necessary to implement our acquisition strategy on terms satisfactory to us, if at all.

As we introduce new products and services, a failure to predict and react to consumer demand could adversely affect our business.

We have dedicated significant resources to the development, manufacturing and marketing of new products. Decisions to develop and market new transportation products are typically made without firm indications of customer acceptance. Moreover, by their nature, new products may require alteration of existing business methods or threaten to displace existing equipment in which our customers may have a substantial capital investment. There can be no assurance that any new products that we develop will gain widespread acceptance in the marketplace or that such products will be able to compete successfully with other new products or services that may be introduced by competitors. In addition, we may incur additional warranty or other costs as new products are tested and used by customers.

Our revenues are subject to cyclical variations in the railway and passenger transit markets and changes in government spending.

The railway industry historically has been subject to significant fluctuations due to overall economic conditions, the use of alternate methods of transportation and the levels of federal, state and local government spending on railroad transit projects. In economic downturns, railroads have deferred, and may defer, certain expenditures in order to conserve cash in the short term. Reductions in freight traffic may reduce demand for our replacement products.

 

12


Table of Contents

The passenger transit railroad industry is also cyclical. New passenger transit car orders vary from year to year and are influenced greatly by major replacement programs and by the construction or expansion of transit systems by transit authorities. A substantial portion of our net sales have been, and we expect that a material portion of our future net sales may be, derived from contracts with metropolitan transit and commuter rail authorities and Amtrak. To the extent that future funding for proposed public projects is curtailed or withdrawn altogether as a result of changes in political, economic, fiscal or other conditions beyond our control, such projects may be delayed or cancelled, resulting in a potential loss of business for us, including transit aftermarket and new transit car orders. There can be no assurance that economic conditions will be favorable or that there will not be significant fluctuations adversely affecting the industry as a whole and, as a result, us.

A growing portion of our sales may be derived from our international operations, which exposes us to certain risks inherent in doing business on an international level.

In fiscal year 2009, approximately 40% of our consolidated net sales were to customers outside of the U.S. and we intend to continue to expand our international operations in the future. We currently conduct our international operations through a variety of wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, India, Italy, Macedonia, Malaysia, Mexico, Poland, Spain, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. As a result, we are subject to various risks, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on those operations and on our business as a whole, including:

 

   

lack of complete operating control;

 

   

lack of local business experience;

 

   

currency exchange fluctuations and devaluations;

 

   

foreign trade restrictions and exchange controls;

 

   

difficulty enforcing agreements and intellectual property rights;

 

   

the potential for nationalization of enterprises; and

 

   

economic, political and social instability and possible terrorist attacks against American interests.

In addition, certain jurisdictions have laws that limit the ability of non-U.S. subsidiaries and their affiliates to pay dividends and repatriate cash flows.

We may incur increased costs due to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.

In the ordinary course of business, we are exposed to increases in interest rates that may adversely affect funding costs associated with variable-rate debt and changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We may seek to minimize these risks through the use of interest rate swap contracts and currency hedging agreements. There can be no assurance that any of these measures will be effective. Any material changes in interest or exchange rates could result in material losses to us.

We may have liability arising from asbestos litigation.

Claims have been filed against the Company and certain of its affiliates in various jurisdictions across the United States by persons alleging bodily injury as a result of exposure to asbestos-containing products. Most of these claims have been made against our wholly owned subsidiary, Railroad Friction Products Corporation (RFPC), and are based on a product sold by RFPC prior to the time that the Company acquired any interest in RFPC.

Most of these claims, including all of the RFPC claims, are submitted to insurance carriers for defense and indemnity or to non-affiliated companies that retain the liabilities for the asbestos-containing products at issue. We cannot, however, assure that all these claims will be fully covered by insurance or that the indemnitors or insurers will remain financially viable. Our ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to these claims, as is the case with other pending litigation, cannot be estimated.

 

13


Table of Contents

It is Management’s belief that the potential range of loss for asbestos-related bodily injury cases is not reasonably determinable at present due to a variety of factors, including: (1) the asbestos case settlement history of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, RFPC; (2) the unpredictable nature of personal injury litigation in general; and (3) the uncertainty of asbestos litigation in particular. Despite this uncertainty, and although the results of the Company’s operations and cash flows for any given period could be adversely affected by asbestos-related lawsuits, Management believes that the final resolution of the Company’s asbestos-related cases will not be material to the Company’s overall financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In general, this belief is based upon: (1) Wabtec’s and RFPC’s history of settlements and dismissals of asbestos-related cases to date; (2) the inability of many plaintiffs to establish any exposure or causal relationship to RFPC’s product; and (3) the inability of many plaintiffs to demonstrate any identifiable injury or compensable loss.

More specifically, as to RFPC, Management’s belief that any losses due to asbestos-related cases would not be material is also based on the fact that RFPC owns insurance which provides coverage for asbestos-related bodily injury claims. To date, RFPC’s insurers have provided RFPC with defense and indemnity in these actions. The overall number of new claims being filed against RFPC has dropped significantly in recent years; however, these new claims, and all previously filed claims, may take a significant period of time to resolve. As to Wabtec and its divisions, Management’s belief that asbestos-related cases will not have a material impact is also based on its position that it has no legal liability for asbestos-related bodily injury claims, and that the former owners of Wabtec’s assets retained asbestos liabilities for the products at issue. To date, Wabtec has been able to successfully defend itself on this basis, including two arbitration decisions and a judicial opinion, all of which confirmed Wabtec’s position that it did not assume any asbestos liabilities from the former owners of certain Wabtec assets. Although Wabtec has incurred defense and administrative costs in connection with asbestos bodily injury actions, these costs have not been material, and the Company has no information that would suggest these costs would become material in the foreseeable future.

We are subject to a variety of environmental laws and regulations.

We are subject to a variety of environmental laws and regulations governing discharges to air and water, the handling, storage and disposal of hazardous or solid waste materials and the remediation of contamination associated with releases of hazardous substances. We believe our operations currently comply in all material respects with all of the various environmental laws and regulations applicable to our business; however, there can be no assurance that environmental requirements will not change in the future or that we will not incur significant costs to comply with such requirements.

Future climate change regulation could result in increased operating costs, affect the demand for our products or affect the ability of our critical suppliers to meet our needs.

The Company has followed the current debate over climate change and the related policy discussion and prospective legislation. The potential challenges for the Company that climate change policy and legislation may pose have been reviewed by the Company. Any such challenges are heavily dependent on the nature and degree of climate change legislation and the extent to which it applies to our industry. At this time, the Company cannot predict the ultimate impact of climate change and climate change legislation on the Company’s operations. Further, when or if these impacts may occur cannot be assessed until scientific analysis and legislative policy are more developed and specific legislative proposals begin to take shape. Any laws or regulations that may be adopted to restrict or reduce emissions of greenhouse gas could require us to incur increased operating costs, and could have an adverse effect on demand for our products. In addition, the price and availability of certain of the raw materials that we use could vary in the future as a result of environmental laws and regulations affecting our suppliers. An increase in the price of our raw materials or a decline in their availability could adversely affect our operating margins or result in reduced demand for our products.

 

14


Table of Contents

Our manufacturer’s warranties or product liability may expose us to potentially significant claims.

We warrant the workmanship and materials of many of our products. Accordingly, we are subject to a risk of product liability or warranty claims in the event that the failure of any of our products results in personal injury or death, or does not conform to our customers’ specifications. In addition, in recent years, we have introduced a number of new products for which we do not have the same level of historical warranty experience. Although we have not had any material product liability or warranty claims made against us and we currently maintain liability insurance coverage, we cannot assure that product liability claims, if made, would not exceed our insurance coverage limits or that insurance will continue to be available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. The possibility exists for these types of warranty claims to result in costly product recalls, significant repair costs and damage to our reputation.

Labor disputes may have a material adverse effect on our operations and profitability.

We collectively bargain with labor unions that represent approximately 37% of our employees. Our current collective bargaining agreements generally extend through 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013. Agreements expiring in 2010 cover approximately 21% of the Company’s workforce. Failure to reach an agreement could result in strikes or other labor protests which could disrupt our operations. If we were to experience a strike or work stoppage, it would be difficult for us to find a sufficient number of employees with the necessary skills to replace these employees. We cannot assure that we will reach any such agreement or that we will not encounter strikes or other types of conflicts with the labor unions of our personnel. Such labor disputes could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, could cause us to lose revenues and customers and might have permanent effects on our business.

From time to time we are engaged in contractual disputes with our customers.

From time to time, we are engaged in contractual disputes with our customers regarding routine delivery and performance issues as well as adjustments for design changes and related extra work. These disputes are generally resolved in the ordinary course of business without having a material adverse impact on us.

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health.

At December 31, 2009, we had total debt of $391.8 million. If it becomes necessary to access our available borrowing capacity under the 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement, along with carrying the $241.0 million currently borrowed under this facility and the $150.0 million 6.875% senior notes, being indebted could have important consequences to us. For example, it could:

 

   

increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

 

   

require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;

 

   

limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industries in which we operate;

 

   

place us at a disadvantage compared to competitors that have less debt; and

 

   

limit our ability to borrow additional funds.

The indenture for our $150 million 6.875% senior notes due in 2013 and our 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement contain various covenants that limit our Management’s discretion in the operation of our businesses.

The indenture governing the notes and our credit agreement contain various covenants that limit our Management’s discretion.

 

15


Table of Contents

The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement limits the Company’s ability to declare or pay cash dividends and prohibits the Company from declaring or making other distributions, subject to certain exceptions. The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement contains various other covenants and restrictions including the following limitations: incurrence of additional indebtedness; mergers, consolidations and sales of assets and acquisitions; additional liens; sale and leasebacks; permissible investments, loans and advances; certain debt payments; capital expenditures; and imposes a minimum interest expense coverage ratio and a maximum debt to cash flow ratio.

The indenture under which the senior notes were issued contains covenants and restrictions which limit among other things, the following: the incurrence of indebtedness, payment of dividends and certain distributions, sale of assets, change in control, mergers and consolidations and the incurrence of liens.

The integration of our recently completed acquisitions may not result in anticipated improvements in market position or the realization of anticipated operating synergies or may take longer to realize than expected.

In 2008 and 2009, we completed the acquisition of Poli, SCT and Unifin for a combined $482.6 million, net of cash received. Although we believe that the acquisitions will improve our market position and realize positive operating results, including operating synergies, operating expense reductions and overhead cost savings, we cannot be assured that these improvements will be obtained. The management and acquisition of businesses involves substantial risks, any of which may result in a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations, including:

 

   

the uncertainty that an acquired business will achieve anticipated operating results;

 

   

significant expenses to integrate;

 

   

diversion of Management’s attention;

 

   

departure of key personnel from the acquired business;

 

   

effectively managing entrepreneurial spirit and decision-making;

 

   

integration of different information systems;

 

   

unanticipated costs and exposure to unforeseen liabilities; and

 

   

impairment of assets.

 

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

 

16


Table of Contents
Item 2. PROPERTIES

Facilities

The following table provides certain summary information about the principal facilities owned or leased by the Company. The Company believes that its facilities and equipment are generally in good condition and that, together with scheduled capital improvements, they are adequate for its present and immediately projected needs. Leases on the facilities are long-term and generally include options to renew. The Company’s corporate headquarters are located at the Wilmerding, PA site.

 

Location

 

Primary Use

 

Segment

 

Own/Lease

  Approximate
Square Feet
 

Domestic

       

Wilmerding, PA

  Manufacturing/Service   Freight   Own   365,000 (1) 

Lexington, TN

  Manufacturing   Freight   Own   170,000   

Jackson, TN

  Manufacturing   Freight   Own   150,000   

Chicago, IL

  Manufacturing/Service   Freight   Own   123,140   

Warren, OH

  Manufacturing   Freight   Own   102,650   

Greensburg, PA

  Manufacturing   Freight   Own   97,800   

Coshocton, OH

  Manufacturing/Warehouse/Office   Freight   Own   83,000   

Germantown, MD

  Manufacturing   Freight   Own   80,000   

Salem, OH

  Manufacturing   Freight   Own   20,000   

Gibsonia, PA

  Manufacturing/Office   Freight   Own   16,160 (2) 

Chillicothe, OH

  Manufacturing/Office   Freight   Lease   104,000   

Kansas City, MO

  Service Center   Freight   Lease   95,900   

Strongsville, OH

  Manufacturing/Warehouse/Office   Freight   Lease   92,000   

Pittsburgh, PA

  Manufacturing   Freight   Lease   90,000   

Bensenville, IL

  Manufacturing/Warehouse/Office   Freight   Lease   58,000   

Columbia, SC

  Service Center   Freight   Lease   40,250   

Cedar Rapids, IA

  Manufacturing   Freight   Lease   37,000   

St. Joseph, MI

  Manufacturing/Warehouse   Freight   Lease   33,625 (2) 

Chesapeake, VA

  Manufacturing/Office   Freight   Lease   22,630   

Carson City, NV

  Service Center   Freight   Lease   22,000   

Montgomery, IL

  Warehouse/Office   Freight   Lease   20,000 (2) 

Park Ridge, IL

  Office   Freight   Lease   15,150   

Jackson, TN

  Warehouse   Freight   Lease   6,000   

Oak Creek, WI

  Engineering/Admin   Freight   Lease   5,000   

Twinsburg, OH

  Manufacturing/Office   Freight   Lease   1,700   

Azle, TX

  Office   Freight   Lease   1,400   

Boise, ID

  Manufacturing   Freight /Transit   Own   326,000   

Maxton, NC

  Manufacturing   Freight /Transit   Own   105,000   

Willits, CA

  Manufacturing   Freight /Transit   Own   70,000   

Panorama City, CA

  Manufacturing   Transit   Lease   200,000   

Spartanburg, SC

  Manufacturing/Service   Transit   Lease   183,600   

Buffalo Grove, IL

  Manufacturing   Transit   Lease   115,570   

Plattsburgh, NY

  Manufacturing   Transit   Lease   64,000   

Elmsford, NY

  Service Center   Transit   Lease   28,000   

Spartanburg, SC

  Warehouse   Transit   Lease   20,000   

Green, SC

  Warehouse   Transit   Lease   17,000   

Elkhart, IN

  Warehouse   Transit   Lease   8,000   

Green, SC

  Warehouse   Transit   Lease   6,000   

Avondale, GA

  Sales Office   Transit   Lease   1,720   

San Pablo, CA

  Office   Transit   Lease   550   

 

17


Table of Contents

Location

 

Primary Use

 

Segment

 

Own/Lease

  Approximate
Square Feet

New Castle, DE

  Sales Office   Transit   Lease   400

Baltimore, MD

  Sales Office   Transit   Lease   350

Mountaintop, PA

  Vacant Land Available for Sale     Own   N/A

International

       

Wallaceburg (Ontario), Canada

  Foundry   Freight   Own   126,600

San Luis Potosi, Mexico

  Manufacturing/Service   Freight   Own   73,100

Skopje, Macedonia

  Manufacturing/Office   Freight   Own   20,000

Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, China

  Manufacturing   Freight   Lease   290,550

London (Ontario), Canada

  Manufacturing   Freight   Lease   103,540

Beijing, China

  Manufacturing   Freight   Lease   75,347

Stoney Creek (Ontario), Canada

  Manufacturing/Service   Freight   Lease   47,940

Kolkata, India

  Manufacturing   Freight   Lease   36,965

Lachine (Quebec), Canada

  Service Center   Freight   Lease   17,000

Rydalmere, Australia

  Office   Freight   Lease   14,786

Beijing, China

  Office   Freight   Lease   3,552

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  Office   Freight   Lease   2,655

Calgary (Alberta), Canada

  Service Center   Freight   Lease   984

Kutna Hora, Czech Republic

  Warehouse   Freight   Lease   532

Kirkcaldy, UK

  Office   Freight   Lease   200

Nepean (Ontario), Canada

  Office   Freight   Lease   120

Doncaster, UK

  Manufacturing/Service   Freight /Transit   Own   330,000

Wetherill Park, Australia

  Manufacturing   Freight /Transit   Lease   70,600

Kempton Park, South Africa

  Manufacturing   Freight /Transit   Lease   11,840

Avellino, Italy

  Manufacturing/Office   Transit   Own   132,495

St. Laurent (Quebec), Canada

  Manufacturing   Transit   Own   106,000

Recklinghausen, Germany

  Manufacturing   Transit   Own   86,390

Camisano, Italy

  Manufacturing/Office   Transit   Lease   136,465

Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China

  Manufacturing   Transit   Lease   31,032

Belo Horizonte, Brazil

  Manufacturing/Service   Transit   Lease   33,992

Sassuolo, Italy

  Manufacturing   Transit   Lease   30,000

Droylsden, UK

  Manufacturing/Office   Transit   Lease   22,500

Aachen, Germany

  Office   Transit   Lease   1,615

Munich, Germany

  Office   Transit   Lease   1,615

Vierzon, France

  Office   Transit   Lease   1,076

Milan, Italy

  Office   Transit   Lease   1,000

Derby, UK

  Office   Transit   Lease   850

Warsaw, Poland

  Office   Transit   Lease   775

Barcelona, Spain

  Office   Transit   Lease   110

 

(1) Approximately 250,000 square feet are currently used in connection with the Company’s corporate and manufacturing operations. The remainder is leased to third parties.
(2) These facilities were part of the SCT purchase and the operations have been consolidated at other existing plants and are no longer in service.

 

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Information with respect to legal proceedings is included in Note 19 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.

 

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

 

18


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The following table provides information on our executive officers. They are elected periodically by our Board of Directors and serve at its discretion.

 

Officers

  

Age

  

Position

Albert J. Neupaver    59    President and Chief Executive Officer
Alvaro Garcia-Tunon    57    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Raymond T. Betler    54    Vice President, Group Executive
R. Mark Cox    42    Vice President, Corporate Development
Patrick D. Dugan    43    Vice President, Finance and Corporate Controller
Keith P. Hildum    47    Vice President and Treasurer
Charles F. Kovac    53    Vice President, Group Executive
Richard A. Mathes    55    Vice President, Group Executive
David M. Seitz    45    Vice President, Senior Counsel and Assistant Secretary
Scott E. Wahlstrom    46    Vice President, Human Resources
Timothy R. Wesley    48    Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications

Albert J. Neupaver was named President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in February, 2006. Prior to joining Wabtec, Mr. Neupaver served in various positions at AMETEK, Inc., a leading global manufacturer of electronic instruments and electric motors. Most recently he served as President of its Electromechanical Group for nine years.

Alvaro Garcia-Tunon has been Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company since March 2003. Mr. Garcia-Tunon was Senior Vice President, Finance of the Company from November 1999 until March 2003 and Treasurer of the Company from August 1995 until November 1999.

Raymond T. Betler has been Vice President, Group Executive since August 2008. Prior to joining Wabtec, Mr. Betler served in various positions of increasing responsibility at Bombardier Transportation since 1979. Most recently, Mr. Betler served as President, Total Transit Systems from 2004 until 2008 and before that as President, London Underground Projects from 2002 to 2004.

R. Mark Cox was named Vice President, Corporate Development in September 2006. Prior to joining Wabtec, Mr. Cox served as Director of Business Development for the Electrical Group of Eaton Corporation since 2002. Prior to joining Eaton, Mr. Cox was an investment banker with UBS Warburg, Prudential and Stephens.

Patrick D. Dugan was named Vice President, Finance and Corporate Controller in January 2007. He has served as Corporate Controller since November 2003. Prior to joining Wabtec, Mr. Dugan served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CWI International, Inc. from December 1996 to November 2003. Prior to 1996, Mr. Dugan was a Manager with PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Keith P. Hildum was named Vice President and Treasurer in October 2006. He had been serving as Treasurer of the Company since 2001, and prior to that was Vice President, Finance and Administration—Railroad Operations. He has been with Wabtec since 1999, having held various positions with MotivePower Industries. Prior to MotivePower, Mr. Hildum was a Senior Manager with Deloitte & Touche.

Charles F. Kovac was named Vice President, Group Executive in September 2007. Prior to joining Wabtec, Mr. Kovac served as General Manager of the Global Floor Care/Specialty Motors Division of AMETEK, Inc. since 2003. Prior to joining AMETEK, Inc., Mr. Kovac was Chief Operating Officer of The Teleios Group, LLC from 1999 to 2003.

 

19


Table of Contents

Richard A. Mathes was named Vice President, Group Executive of Wabtec in December, 2008. Prior to joining Wabtec Mr. Mathes was CEO of SCT from 1995 to 2008, having rejoined SCT in 1989 as President. Mr. Mathes had previously been in sales and marketing with SCT from 1979 through 1984 before leaving to pursue other opportunities in the rail industry. He began his 36 year career in the transportation industry in 1972 with the Missouri Pacific Railroad in St. Louis, MO.

David M. Seitz was promoted to Vice President, Senior Counsel and Assistant Secretary in January 2008. He had served as Senior Counsel and Assistant Secretary of Wabtec since 2000 and was appointed as an executive officer in 2006. Prior to joining Wabtec, Mr. Seitz was General Attorney and Assistant Secretary at Transtar, Inc., and had also been an electrical engineer with Westinghouse Electric Company.

Scott E. Wahlstrom has been Vice President, Human Resources, since November 1999. Previously, Mr. Wahlstrom was Vice President, Human Resources & Administration of MotivePower Industries, Inc. from August 1996 until November 1999.

Timothy R. Wesley has been Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications since November 1999. Previously, Mr. Wesley was Vice President, Investor and Public Relations of MotivePower Industries, Inc. from August 1996 until November 1999.

PART II

 

Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Common Stock of the Company is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. As of February 22, 2010, there were 47,619,699 shares of Common Stock outstanding held by 794 holders of record. The high and low sales price of the shares and dividends declared per share were as follows:

 

2009

   High    Low    Dividends

First Quarter

   $ 40.74    $ 23.14    $ 0.01

Second Quarter

   $ 39.94    $ 25.19    $ 0.01

Third Quarter

   $ 40.18    $ 29.84    $ 0.01

Fourth Quarter

   $ 42.91    $ 36.00    $ 0.01

2008

   High    Low    Dividends

First Quarter

   $ 37.37    $ 28.72    $ 0.01

Second Quarter

   $ 51.50    $ 36.49    $ 0.01

Third Quarter

   $ 60.75    $ 43.29    $ 0.01

Fourth Quarter

   $ 55.81    $ 28.86    $ 0.01

The Company’s credit agreement restricts the ability to make dividend payments, with certain exceptions. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and see Note 9 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.

At the close of business on February 22, 2010, the Company’s Common Stock traded at $39.36 per share.

The following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference to any future filings under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that Wabtec specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing. The graph below compares the total stockholder return through December 31, 2009, of Wabtec’s common stock, (i) the S&P 500,

 

20


Table of Contents

(ii) and our peer group of manufacturing companies consisting of the following publicly traded companies: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc., L.B. Foster Company, Trinity Industries, Portec Rail Products, Inc. and Freight Car America, Inc.

LOGO

On July 31, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50 million of the Company’s outstanding shares. On February 20, 2008 the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $100 million of the Company’s outstanding shares. The Company intends to purchase these shares on the open market or in negotiated or block trades. No time limit was set for the completion of the program. The program qualifies under the 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement, as applicable, as well as the 6.875% Senior Notes currently outstanding.

During the first quarter of 2008, the Company repurchased 712,900 shares at an average price of $34.29 per share, exhausting the $50.0 million authorization made in 2006. During the second quarter of 2008, the Company repurchased 5,200 shares at an average price of $35.97 per share. No additional shares were repurchased during the third quarter of 2008. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company repurchased 599,800 shares at an average price of $35.22 per share. All purchases were on the open market.

During the first quarter of 2009, the Company repurchased 290,000 shares at an average price of $25.08 per share. During the second quarter of 2009, the Company repurchased 379,700 shares at an average price of $32.61 per share. No additional shares were repurchased during the third and fourth quarters of 2009. All purchases were on the open market.

 

21


Table of Contents
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table shows selected consolidated financial information of the Company and has been derived from audited financial statements. This financial information should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by reference to, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

 

     Year Ended December 31,  

In thousands, except per share amounts

   2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  

Income Statement Data

          

Net sales

   $ 1,401,616      $ 1,574,749      $ 1,360,088      $ 1,087,620      $ 1,034,024   

Gross profit

     393,326        427,186        369,619        296,777        259,646   

Operating expenses

     (213,294     (214,670     (189,878     (166,626     (157,717
                                        

Income from operations (1)

   $ 180,032      $ 212,516      $ 179,741      $ 130,151      $ 101,929   
                                        

Interest expense, net

   $ (16,674   $ (8,508   $ (3,637   $ (2,177   $ (9,358

Other income (expense), net

     1        292        (3,650     (1,417     (3,055

Income from continuing operations

     115,055        130,554        109,387        86,494        57,685   

Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of tax) (2)

     —          (3     183        (1,690     (1,909
                                        

Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders (3)

   $ 115,055      $ 130,551      $ 109,570      $ 84,804      $ 55,776   
                                        

Diluted Earnings per Common Share

          

Income from continuing operations

   $ 2.39      $ 2.66      $ 2.24      $ 1.76      $ 1.21   

Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders (3)

   $ 2.39      $ 2.66      $ 2.24      $ 1.73      $ 1.17   
                                        

Cash dividends declared per share

   $ 0.04      $ 0.04      $ 0.04      $ 0.04      $ 0.04   
                                        

Fully diluted shares outstanding

     47,977        48,847        48,873        49,108        47,595   
                                        

Balance Sheet Data

          

Total assets

   $ 1,585,835      $ 1,507,520      $ 1,158,702      $ 972,842      $ 836,357   

Cash

     188,659        141,805        234,689        187,979        141,365   

Total debt

     391,780        387,080        150,250        150,000        150,000   

Shareholders’ equity

     778,913        645,807        617,268        469,889        379,207   

 

(1) In 2009, includes $3.9 million royalty charge related to the Final Award in the arbitration proceeding between Faiveley Transport Malmo AB and Wabtec.
(2) In 2006, includes $1.7 million relating to the sale of a non-core product division of Rütgers Rail, S.p.A. In 2005, includes $1.6 million relating to the liquidation of the bus door joint venture in China.
(3) In 2009, 2008 and 2006, tax benefits of $9.7 million, $1.0 million and $700,000 were recognized, respectively, primarily related to resolving certain tax issues from prior years that have been closed from further regulatory examination. In 2007 and 2006, a tax benefit of $3.1 million and $5.3 million, respectively, was recognized related to deferred taxes, primarily due to the reversal of previously established valuation allowances on deferred tax assets.

 

22


Table of Contents
Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

Wabtec is one of the world’s largest providers of value-added, technology-based products and services for the global rail industry. Our products are found on virtually all U.S. locomotives, freight cars and passenger transit vehicles, as well as in approximately 100 countries throughout the world. Our products enhance safety, improve productivity and reduce maintenance costs for customers, and many of our core products and services are essential in the safe and efficient operation of freight rail and passenger transit vehicles. Wabtec is a global company with operations in 17 countries. In 2009, about 40% of the Company’s revenues came from customers outside the U.S.

Management Review and Outlook

Wabtec’s long-term financial goals are to generate cash flow in excess of net income, maintain a strong credit profile while minimizing our overall cost of capital, increase margins through strict attention to cost controls, and increase revenues through a focused growth strategy, including global and market expansion, new products and technologies, aftermarket products and services, and acquisitions. In addition, Management evaluates the Company’s short-term operational performance through measures such as quality and on-time delivery.

The Company monitors a variety of factors and statistics to gauge market activity. The freight rail industry is largely driven by general economic conditions, which can cause fluctuations in rail traffic. Based on those fluctuations, railroads can increase or decrease purchases of new locomotives and freight cars. In 2009, the U.S. economy, in general, and the Company specifically were impacted by the global economic recession during the year. This was particularly true for the Company’s Freight Segment. In the U.S., for example, freight revenue ton-miles and carloadings were down 15.1% and 16.1%, respectively, although they did improve slightly in the second half of the year. With rail traffic down significantly, railroads put a portion of their locomotive and freight car fleets in storage, and reduced purchases of new equipment. As a result, 2009 deliveries of new freight locomotives decreased about 50% and deliveries of new freight cars decreased about 65%. Although less than 15% of the Company’s revenues are directly related to deliveries of new freight locomotives and freight cars, the decline in those markets had a material impact on the Company’s financial results. To mitigate this impact, Wabtec initiated a series of restructuring actions that included plant consolidations, a work force reduction and other cost reduction efforts.

The North American transit rail industry is driven by government spending and ridership. Spending increased about 6% in 2009, while ridership decreased about 4% due to the economy. In February 2009, the U.S. federal government passed new spending legislation designed to stimulate the U.S. economy. Of the $789 billion spending package, up to $20 billion is to be spent on freight and passenger transportation, as follows: $8.4 billion for public transportation, $8 billion for high-speed rail, $1.5 billion for discretionary intermodal projects, and $1.3 billion for AMTRAK. Wabtec expects to benefit from this additional spending, as transit authorities invest in expansion, new equipment and other related projects.

In 2010, the Company expects conditions to remain challenging in the freight rail market and generally stable in the passenger transit market. Demand for new freight cars and locomotives are expected to be lower, due to the railroads’ amount of surplus equipment. In the passenger transit market, the Company believes that increases in federal funding and stable ridership will continue to have a beneficial effect on the demand for new equipment and aftermarket parts. In response to current market conditions, Wabtec may continue to take certain actions to reduce costs, including plant consolidations, work force reductions and general spending cuts. Management believes these actions will not affect the company’s ability to continue to invest in its strategic growth initiatives.

 

23


Table of Contents

In 2010 and beyond, unfavorable general economic and market conditions in the United States and internationally could have a negative impact on our sales and operations. To the extent that the economy is slow to recover and results in continued instability of capital markets, shortages of raw materials or component parts, longer sales cycles, deferral or delay of customer orders or an inability to market our products effectively, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, we face risks associated with our four-point growth strategy include the level of investment that customers are willing to make in new technologies developed by the industry and the Company, and risks inherent in global expansion. When necessary, we will modify our financial and operating strategies to reflect changes in market conditions and risks.

Wabtec downsized its Canadian operations by moving certain products to lower-cost facilities and outsourcing. In the Freight segment, Wabtec recorded charges of 4.6 million and $3.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. No charges for these operations and this restructuring plan were recorded in the year ended December 31, 2009. For these operations cumulative expenses for restructuring and other expenses recorded since 2006 have been $16.5 million, comprised of the $5.7 million for employee severance costs for approximately 400 employees; $5.5 million of pension and postretirement benefit curtailment for those employees; and $5.3 million related to fixed asset and goodwill impairment. Goodwill impairment was recorded as amortization expense and most of the other charges were recorded in cost of sales. Severance costs are contractual liabilities and payment is dependent on the waiver by or expiration of certain seniority rights of those employees. As of December 31, 2009, $4.2 million of this amount had been paid.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table shows our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years indicated.

 

     Year Ended December 31,  

In millions

   2009     2008     2007  

Net sales

   $ 1,401.6      $ 1,574.8      $ 1,360.1   

Cost of sales

     (1,008.3     (1,147.6     (990.5
                        

Gross profit

     393.3        427.2        369.6   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

     (161.0     (170.6     (148.5

Engineering expenses

     (42.4     (39.0     (37.4

Amortization expense

     (9.9     (5.1     (4.0
                        

Total operating expenses

     (213.3     (214.7     (189.9
                        

Income from operations

     180.0        212.5        179.7   

Interest expense, net

     (16.6     (8.5     (3.6

Other income (expense), net

     —          0.3        (3.6
                        

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

     163.4        204.3        172.5   

Income tax expense

     (48.3     (73.7     (63.1
                        

Income from continuing operations

     115.1        130.6        109.4   

Discontinued operations (net of tax)

     —          —          0.2   
                        

Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders

   $ 115.1      $ 130.6      $ 109.6   
                        

 

24


Table of Contents

2009 COMPARED TO 2008

The following table summarizes the results of operations for the period:

 

     For the year ended December 31,  

In thousands

   2009    2008    Percent
Change
 

Net sales

   $ 1,401,616    $ 1,574,749    (11.0 )% 

Income from operations

     180,032      212,516    (15.3 )% 

Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders

     115,055      130,551    (11.9 )% 

Net sales decreased by $173.2 million to $1,401.6 million in 2009 from $1,574.8 million in 2008. The decrease is due to the recession experienced during the previous twelve months, which contributed to lower rail traffic and lower Freight Group sales. Sales related to acquisitions of $114.9 million, partially offset the decrease. The Company realized a net sales reduction of $35.1 million due to unfavorable effects of foreign exchange, but net earnings were generally not impacted by foreign exchange.

Net income for 2009 was $115.1 million or $2.39 per diluted share. Net income for 2008 was $130.6 million or $2.66 per diluted share. Net income decreased due to lower Freight Group sales, severance and other costs related to downsizing and consolidation actions, partially offset by cost-saving initiatives and lower income taxes. Net income was also decreased by the $3.9 million royalty charge, included in selling, general and administrative expenses, related to the Final Award in the arbitration proceeding between Faiveley Transport Malmo AB and Wabtec.

Net sales by Segment The following table shows the Company’s net sales by business segment:

 

     For the year ended
December 31,

In thousands

   2009    2008

Freight Group

   $ 588,399    $ 773,523

Transit Group

     813,217      801,226
             

Net sales

   $ 1,401,616    $ 1,574,749

Freight Group sales decreased by $185.2 million or 23.9% due to lower sales of $145.7 million for specialty products, $107.3 million for brake products and $21.5 million for remanufacturing, overhaul and manufacturing of locomotives. Offsetting those reductions was an increase in sales of $103.1 million from acquisitions. Transit Group sales increased by $12.0 million or 1.5% due to

increased sales of $17.1 million for brake products, $25.0 million for other transit related products and $11.8 million from acquisitions. Offsetting those increases was a decrease in sales of $10.0 million for remanufacturing, overhaul and build of locomotives. For the Transit Group, net sales were reduced by $30.9 million due to unfavorable effects of foreign exchange on sales mentioned above.

Gross profit Gross profit decreased to $393.3 million in 2009 compared to $427.2 million in 2008. Gross profit is dependent on a number of factors including pricing, sales volume and product mix. In 2009, gross profit, as a percentage of sales, was 28.1% compared to 27.1% in 2008. The gross profit percentage increased due to realized cost savings from downsizing and consolidation actions and increased gross profit in the transit segment due to efficiencies realized on certain long-term contracts. The provision for warranty expense is generally established for specific losses, along with historical estimates of customer claims as a percentage of sales. The provision for warranty expense was $3.4 more in 2009 compared to 2008 due primarily to specific reserves on certain transit products. The warranty reserve decreased at December 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008 by $1.5 million due to claims paid on certain freight products.

 

25


Table of Contents

Operating expenses The following table shows our operating expenses:

 

     For the year ended December 31,  

In thousands

   2009    2008    Percent
Change
 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   $ 160,998    $ 170,597    (5.6 )% 

Engineering expenses

     42,447      38,981    8.9

Amortization expense

     9,849      5,092    93.4
                    

Total operating expenses

   $ 213,294    $ 214,670    (0.6 )% 
                    

Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased $9.6 million in 2009 compared to 2008 due to cost-saving initiatives, partially offset by increased expenses from acquisitions. Engineering expenses increased by $3.4 million in 2009 compared to 2008 due to acquisitions, offset partially by cost-saving initiatives. Amortization expense increased $4.8 million due to acquisitions. During 2009, the Company sold a facility for net cash proceeds of $3.6 million to an unrelated third party. While certain portions of the building are being leased back, this transaction resulted in a gain of $2.1 million and deferred gain of $0.6 million. The deferred gain will be recognized over five years. Total operating expenses were 15.2% and 13.6% of sales for 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Income from operations Income from operations totaled $180.0 million (or 12.8% of sales) in 2009 compared to $212.5 million (or 13.5% of sales) in 2008. Income from operations decreased due to lower Freight Group sales, severance and other costs related to downsizing and consolidation actions and the royalty payment to Faiveley Transport Malmo AB, partially offset by cost-saving initiatives.

Interest expense, net Interest expense, net increased $8.1 million in 2009 compared to 2008 due to acquisition financing.

Other expense, net Other expense, net decreased $0.3 million in 2009 compared to 2008. The Company recorded foreign exchange expense of $1.3 million due to the effect of currency exchange rate changes on intercompany transactions that are non U.S. dollar denominated amounts and charged or credited to earnings. This was offset by $1.0 million of other miscellaneous income.

Income taxes The effective income tax rate was 29.6% and 36.1% in 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the settlement of examinations in various taxing jurisdictions during 2009.

Net income Net income for 2009 decreased $15.5 million, compared to 2008. The decrease in net income is due primarily to lower sales.

2008 COMPARED TO 2007

The following table summarizes the results of operations for the period:

 

     For the year ended December 31,  

In thousands

   2008    2007    Percent
Change
 

Net sales

   $ 1,574,749    $ 1,360,088    15.8

Income from operations

     212,516      179,741    18.2

Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders

     130,551      109,570    19.2

Net sales increased by $214.7 million to $1,574.8 million in 2008 from $1,360.1 million in 2007. The increase is due to internal growth from increased sales of $55.3 million for brake products, $36.8 million for

 

26


Table of Contents

contracts related to transit authorities, $21.8 million in remanufacturing, overhaul and build of locomotives, and $16.6 million for heat exchangers. Sales related to acquisitions also contributed $59.3 million to the increase. Sales related to international expansion also contributed $18 million to the increase. Offsetting these increases, the Company did realize a net sales decrease of $12.2 million due to foreign exchange but net earnings are mostly not impacted by foreign exchange.

Net income for 2008 was $130.6 million or $2.66 per diluted share. Net income for 2007 was $109.6 million or $2.24 per diluted share. Net income improved primarily due to sales increases.

Net sales by Segment The following table shows the Company’s net sales by business segment:

 

     For the year ended
December 31,

In thousands

   2008    2007

Freight Group

   $ 773,523    $ 734,173

Transit Group

     801,226      625,915
             

Net sales

   $ 1,574,749    $ 1,360,088

Freight Group sales increased by $39.4 million or 5.4% due to increased sales from international expansion of $18 million, increased sales from heat exchangers of $16.6 million, sales of $11.2 million for aftermarket brake products, and sales of $11.1 million from an acquisition completed in the fourth quarter of 2008. Offsetting these increases were decreases of $20.9 million in locomotive component, repair and refurbishment services. Transit Group sales increased by $175.3 million or 28% due to increased sales of brake products of $52.1 million, contracts related to transit authorities of $37.6 million, increased sales of $21.8 million related to refurbishment of transit cars, and sales of $48 million for the full year results from acquisitions completed in 2007 and the acquisitions completed in the second quarter of 2008.

Gross profit Gross profit increased to $427.2 million in 2008 compared to $369.6 million in 2007. Gross profit is dependent on a number of factors including pricing, sales volume and product mix. In 2008, gross profit, as a percentage of sales, was 27.1% compared to 27.2% in 2007. The gross profit percentage was flat due to the changing mix of revenues from Freight to Transit as Transit margins tend to be lower than Freight. This was offset by ongoing efficiency and cost saving initiatives. The provision for warranty expense is generally established for specific losses, along with historical estimates of customer claims as a percentage of sales. The provision for warranty expense was $10.7 more in 2008 compared to 2007 because of increased sales, particularly for large transit authority contracts which ramped up in 2008. The warranty reserve increased at December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007 by $8.4 million due to $4 million from acquisitions completed in 2008, and primarily from customer claims or transit authority contracts.

Operating expenses The following table shows our operating expenses:

 

     For the year ended December 31,  

In thousands

   2008    2007    Percent
Change
 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   $ 170,597    $ 148,437    14.9

Engineering expenses

     38,981      37,434    4.1

Amortization expense

     5,092      4,007    27.1
                    

Total operating expenses

   $ 214,670    $ 189,878    13.1
                    

Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased $22.2 million in 2008 compared to 2007 mostly due to the acquisitions that were completed during the fourth quarter of 2008. Engineering expenses increased by $1.5 million in 2008 compared to 2007 mostly due to those same acquisitions. Amortization expense increased $1.0 million due to acquisitions. Total operating expenses were 13.6% and 14.0% of sales for 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

27


Table of Contents

Income from operations Income from operations totaled $212.5 million (or 13.5% of sales) in 2008 compared to $179.7 million (or 13.2% of sales) in 2007. Income from operations improved primarily due to sales increases.

Interest expense, net Interest expense, net increased $4.9 million in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily due to the Company’s overall lower cash balances, resulting in lower interest income, and acquisition financing incurred in the fourth quarter in connection with the acquisition of Standard Car Truck.

Other expense, net Other expense, net decreased $3.9 million in 2008 compared to 2007. The Company recorded foreign exchange expense of $399,000 and $3.2 million, respectively, in 2008 and 2007, due to the effect of currency exchange rate changes on intercompany transactions that are non U.S. dollar denominated amounts and charged or credited to earnings.

Income taxes The effective income tax rate was 36.1% and 36.6% in 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily the result of a $1.0 million net tax benefit recognized in 2008 due to the expiration of statutory review periods and current examinations in various tax jurisdictions.

Net income Net income for 2008 increased $21.0 million, compared to 2007. Net income improved primarily due to sales increases.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is provided by operating cash flow and borrowings under the Company’s unsecured credit facility with a consortium of commercial banks. The following is a summary of selected cash flow information and other relevant data:

 

     For the year ended
December 31,
 

In thousands

   2009     2008     2007  

Cash provided by (used for):

      

Operating activities

   $ 160,521      $ 159,384      $ 142,509   

Investing activities

     (115,221     (417,441     (93,536

Financing activities:

      

Proceeds from debt

     197,500        236,000        —     

Payments of debt

     (193,324     (385     (657

Stock repurchase

     (19,654     (45,796     (17,888

Cash dividends

     (1,917     (1,940     (1,944

Other

     4,438        1,832        7,504   

Operating activities. Cash provided by operations in 2009 was $160.5 million as compared to $159.4 million in 2008. This $1.1 million increase in cash provided by operations resulted from a net decrease in working capital, offset by lower net income. The decrease in accounts receivables resulted in an improvement of $101.4 million. The decrease in inventories resulted in an improvement of $76.1 million. Accounts payable used cash of $62.5 million due to a reduction in purchasing. These changes were the result of overall reduced volume of sales. Accrued liabilities and customer deposits used cash of $87.7 million due to a reduction in customer deposits on contracts. Other assets and liabilities, including accrued income taxes, used cash of $6.4 million. Net income for the Company decreased $15.5 million primarily as a result of decreased sales, due to the economic recession.

Cash provided by operations in 2008 was $159.4 million as compared to $142.5 million in 2007. This $16.9 million increase was the result of increased earnings offset by certain changes in operating assets and liabilities. Net income for the Company increased $21.0 million primarily as a result of increased sales. Although account

 

28


Table of Contents

receivable continued to increase due to higher overall sales, the increase was less than the increase in 2007 which resulted in a $10.8 million improvement. Inventories increased in 2008 about $28.4 million more than 2007 due to higher inventory on hand for large contracts requirements and overall higher sales activity. Accounts payable increased less in 2008 compared to 2007 by $18.4 million resulting in less cash generated. Customer deposits and other accruals increased compared to 2007 resulting in a cash increase of $35.8 million. Cash was generated due to the collection of large customer deposits on certain long term contracts. Other assets and liabilities, including accrued income taxes, used cash of $9.1 million compared to 2007.

Investing activities. In 2009 and 2008, cash used in investing activities was $115.2 million and $417.4 million, respectively. In 2009, Wabtec acquired Unifin International LP, and its affiliate, Cardinal Pumps and Exchangers, Inc. for $92.9 million, net of cash received. During 2009 the Company also paid $4.7 million as part of the working capital settlement for the Poli acquisition and $3.4 million to acquire certain other assets. In 2009, the Company sold a facility for net cash proceeds of $3.6 million to an unrelated third party. In 2008, Wabtec acquired 100% of the stock of Poli SpA and Standard Car Truck for $82.3 million and $302.9 million, respectively, net of cash received. Other investments include $8.4 million for certain operations in China, and $4.5 million for certain assets to support our train management business. In 2007, Wabtec acquired 100% of the stock of Ricon Corporation for $73.6 million, net of cash received. Capital expenditures were $18.3 million, $19.7 million, and $19.7 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Financing activities. In 2009, cash used for financing activities was $13.0 million, which included $197.5 million in proceeds from debt and $162.5 million of repayments of debt on the revolving credit facility, $30.8 million of debt repayments on the term loan and other debt, $1.9 million of dividend payments and $19.7 million of Wabtec stock repurchases. In 2008, cash provided by financing activities was $189.7 million, which included $236.0 million of borrowings under the new credit facility, offset by $45.8 million of Wabtec stock repurchases.

The following table shows outstanding indebtedness at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

 

     December 31,

In thousands

   2009    2008

6.875% senior notes, due 2013

   $ 150,000    $ 150,000

Term Loan Facility

     170,000      200,000

Revolving Credit Facility

     71,000      36,000

Capital Leases

     780      1,080
             

Total

     391,780      387,080

Less—current portion

     32,741      30,381
             

Long-term portion

   $ 359,039    $ 356,699
             

Cash balance at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $188.7 million and $141.8 million, respectively.

2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement

On November 4, 2008, the Company refinanced its existing unsecured revolving credit agreement with a consortium of commercial banks. This “2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement” provides the company with a $300 million five-year revolving credit facility and a $200 million five-year term loan facility. The Company incurred $2.9 million of deferred financing cost related to the 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement. Both facilities expire in January 2013. The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement borrowings bear variable interest rates indexed to the indices described below. At December 31, 2009 the weighted average interest rate on the Company’s variable rate debt was 1.49%. At December 31, 2009, the Company had available bank borrowing capacity, net of $28.6 million of letters of credit, of approximately $200.4 million, subject to certain financial covenant restrictions.

Under the 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement, the Company may elect a Base Rate of interest or an interest rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) of interest (“the Alternate Rate”). The Base Rate

 

29


Table of Contents

adjusts on a daily basis and is the greater of the PNC, N.A. prime rate, 30-day LIBOR plus 150 basis points or the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% per annum, plus a margin that ranges from 25 to 50 basis points. The Alternate rate is based on quoted LIBOR rates plus a margin that ranges from 125 to 200 basis points. Both the Base Rate and Alternate Rate margins are dependent on the Company’s consolidated total indebtedness to cash flow ratios. The Base Rate margin is zero basis points and the initial Alternate Rate margin is 125 basis points. To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on a portion of this variable-rate debt, the Company entered into an interest rate swap which effectively converted a portion of the debt from variable to fixed-rate borrowing during the term of the swap contract. On December 31, 2009, the notional value of the interest rate swap outstanding was $92.5 million and effectively changed the Company’s interest rate on bank debt at December 31, 2009 from a variable rate to a fixed rate of 1.84%. The interest rate swap agreement matures in January 2010. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty. However, since only the cash interest payments are exchanged, exposure is significantly less than the notional amount. The counterparty is a large financial institution and the Company does not anticipate nonperformance.

The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement limits the Company’s ability to declare or pay cash dividends and prohibits the Company from declaring or making other distributions, subject to certain exceptions. The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement contains various other covenants and restrictions including the following limitations: incurrence of additional indebtedness; mergers, consolidations, sales of assets and acquisitions; additional liens; sale and leasebacks; permissible investments, loans and advances; certain debt payments; and imposes a minimum interest expense coverage ratio of 3.0 and a maximum debt to cash flow ratio of 3.25. The Company is in compliance with these measurements and covenants and expects that these measurements will not be any type of limiting factor in executing our operating activities. See Note 9 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.

6.875% Senior Notes Due August 2013. In August 2003, the Company issued $150 million of Senior Notes due in 2013 (“the Notes”). The Notes were issued at par. Interest on the Notes accrues at a rate of 6.875% per annum and is payable semi-annually on January 31 and July 31 of each year. The proceeds were used to repay debt outstanding under the Company’s existing credit agreement, and for general corporate purposes. The principal balance is due in full at maturity.

The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and rank pari passu with all existing and future senior debt and senior to all our existing and future subordinated indebtedness of the Company. The indenture under which the Notes were issued contains covenants and restrictions which limit among other things, the following: the incurrence of indebtedness, payment of dividends and certain distributions, sale of assets, change in control, mergers and consolidations and the incurrence of liens. The Company is in compliance with these measurements and covenants and expects that these measurements will not be any type of limiting factor in executing our operating activities.

Management believes that based on current levels of operations and forecasted earnings, cash flow and liquidity will be sufficient to fund working capital and capital equipment needs as well as meeting debt service requirements. If sources of funds were to fail to satisfy the Company’s cash requirements, the Company may need to refinance our existing debt or obtain additional financing. There is no assurance that such new financing alternatives would be available, and, in any case, such new financing, if available, would be expected to be more costly and burdensome than the debt agreements currently in place.

 

30


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company is obligated to make future payments under various contracts such as debt agreements, lease agreements and have certain contingent commitments such as debt guarantees. The Company has grouped these contractual obligations and off-balance sheet arrangements into operating activities, financing activities, and investing activities in the same manner as they are classified in the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows to provide a better understanding of the nature of the obligations and arrangements and to provide a basis for comparison to historical information. The table below provides a summary of contractual obligations and off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2009:

 

In thousands

   Total    Less than
1 year
   1 – 3
years
   3 – 5
years
   More than
5 years

Operating activities:

              

Purchase obligations (1)

   $ 36,622    $ 31,442    $ 5,180    $ —      $ —  

Operating leases (2)

     38,192      6,496      11,105      8,966      11,625

Pension benefit payments (3)

     —        11,254      21,697      20,981      —  

Postretirement benefit payments (4)

     —        2,107      4,150      4,218      —  

Financing activities:

              

Interest payments (5)

     45,672      13,693      25,640      6,114      225

Long-term debt (6)

     391,780      32,741      80,341      278,560      138

Dividends to shareholders (7)

     —        —        —        —        —  

Investing activities:

              

Capital projects (8)

     25,000      25,000      —        —        —  

Other:

              

Standby letters of credit (9)

     28,786      25,519      460      2,807      —  
                                  

Total

      $ 148,252    $ 148,573    $ 321,646   
                                  

 

(1) Purchase obligations for the purposes of this disclosure have been defined as a contractual obligation that is in excess of $100,000 annually, and $200,000 in total.
(2) Future minimum payments for operating leases are disclosed by year in Note 15 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.
(3) Annual payments to participants are expected to continue into the foreseeable future at the amounts or ranges noted. Pension benefit payments are based on actuarial estimates using current assumptions for discount rates, expected return on long-term assets and rate of compensation increases. The Company expects to contribute about $9.4 million to pension plan investments in 2010. See further disclosure in Note 10 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.
(4) Annual payments to participants are expected to continue into the foreseeable future at the amounts or ranges noted. Postretirement payments are based on actuarial estimates using current assumptions for discount rates and health care costs. See further disclosure in Note 10 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.
(5) Interest payments are payable January and July of each year at 6.875% of $150 million Senior Notes due in 2013. Interest payments for the Term Loan Facility, Revolving Credit Facility and Capital Leases are based on contractual terms and the Company’s current interest rates.
(6) Scheduled principal repayments of outstanding loan balances are disclosed in Note 9 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.
(7) Shareholder dividends are subject to approval by the Company’s Board of Directors, currently at an annual rate of approximately $1.9 million.
(8) The annual capital expenditure budget is subject to approval by the Board of Directors. The 2010 budget amount was approved at the December 2009 Board of Directors meeting.
(9) The Company has $28.6 million in outstanding letters of credit for performance and bid bond purposes, which expire in various dates through 2013. Amounts include interest payments based on contractual terms and the Company’s current interest rate.

 

31


Table of Contents

The above table does not reflect uncertain tax positions of $10.0 million, the timing of which are uncertain except for $589,000 that may become payable during 2010. Refer to Note 11 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information on uncertain tax positions.

Obligations for operating activities. The Company has entered into $36.6 million of material long-term non-cancelable materials and supply purchase obligations. Operating leases represent multi-year obligations for rental of facilities and equipment. Estimated pension funding and post retirement benefit payments are based on actuarial estimates using current assumptions for discount rates, expected return on long-term assets, rate of compensation increases and health care cost trend rates. Benefits paid for pension obligations were $16.0 million and $14.8 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively. Benefits paid for post retirement plans were $1.9 million and $2.0 million in 2009 and in 2008, respectively.

Obligations for financing activities. Cash requirements for financing activities consist primarily of long-term debt repayments, interest payments and dividend payments to shareholders. The Company has historically paid quarterly dividends to shareholders, subject to quarterly approval by our Board of Directors, currently at a rate of approximately $1.9 million annually.

The Company arranges for performance bonds to be issued by third party insurance companies to support certain long term customer contracts. At December 31, 2009 initial value of performance bonds issued on the Company’s behalf is about $153.9 million.

Obligations for investing activities. The Company typically spends approximately $20 million to $30 million a year for capital expenditures, primarily related to facility expansion efficiency and modernization, health and safety, and environmental control. The Company expects annual capital expenditures in the future will be within this range.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For information regarding the impact of certain recent accounting pronouncements on our consolidated financial statements, see Note 2 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.

Forward Looking Statements

We believe that all statements other than statements of historical facts included in this report, including certain statements under “Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” may constitute forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. Although we believe that our assumptions made in connection with the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure that our assumptions and expectations are correct.

These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us, including, among other things:

Economic and industry conditions

 

   

prolonged unfavorable economic and industry conditions in the markets served by us, including North America, South America, Europe, Australia, Asia, and South Africa;

 

   

further decline in demand for freight cars, locomotives, passenger transit cars, buses and related products and services;

 

   

reliance on major original equipment manufacturer customers;

 

32


Table of Contents
   

original equipment manufacturers’ program delays;

 

   

demand for services in the freight and passenger rail industry;

 

   

demand for our products and services;

 

   

orders either being delayed, cancelled, not returning to historical levels, or reduced or any combination of the foregoing;

 

   

consolidations in the rail industry;

 

   

continued outsourcing by our customers; industry demand for faster and more efficient braking equipment;

 

   

fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates; or

 

   

availability of credit;

Operating factors

 

   

supply disruptions;

 

   

technical difficulties;

 

   

changes in operating conditions and costs;

 

   

increases in raw material costs;

 

   

successful introduction of new products;

 

   

performance under material long-term contracts;

 

   

labor relations;

 

   

completion and integration of acquisitions; or

 

   

the development and use of new technology;

Competitive factors

 

   

the actions of competitors;

Political/governmental factors

 

   

political stability in relevant areas of the world;

 

   

future regulation/deregulation of our customers and/or the rail industry;

 

   

levels of governmental funding on transit projects, including for some of our customers;

 

   

political developments and laws and regulations;

 

   

federal and state income tax legislation; or

 

   

the outcome of our existing or any future legal proceedings, including litigation involving our principal customers and any litigation with respect to environmental, asbestos-related matters and pension liabilities; and

Transaction or commercial factors

 

   

the outcome of negotiations with partners, governments, suppliers, customers or others.

 

33


Table of Contents

Statements in this 10-K apply only as of the date on which such statements are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires Management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions regarding uncertainties that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Areas of uncertainty that require judgments, estimates and assumptions include the accounting for derivatives, environmental matters, warranty reserves, the testing of goodwill and other intangibles for impairment, proceeds on assets to be sold, pensions and other postretirement benefits, and tax matters. Management uses historical experience and all available information to make these judgments and estimates, and actual results will inevitably differ from those estimates and assumptions that are used to prepare the Company’s financial statements at any given time. Despite these inherent limitations, Management believes that Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) and the financial statements and related footnotes provide a meaningful and fair perspective of the Company. A discussion of the judgments and uncertainties associated with accounting for derivatives and environmental matters can be found in Notes 2 and 19, respectively, in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.

A summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies is included in Note 2 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report. Management believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables the Company to provide the users of the financial statements with useful and reliable information about the Company’s operating results and financial condition.

 

Description

  

Judgments and Uncertainties

  

Effect if Actual Results Differ From
Assumptions

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:

     

The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts to cover anticipated losses on uncollectible accounts receivable.

   The allowance for doubtful accounts receivable reflects our best estimate of probable losses inherent in our receivable portfolio determined on the basis of historical experience, specific allowances for known troubled accounts and other currently available evidence.    If our estimates regarding the collectability of troubled accounts, and/or our actual losses within our receivable portfolio exceed our historical experience, we may be exposed to the expense of increasing our allowance for doubtful accounts.

Inventories:

     

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.

   Cost is determined under the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Inventory costs include material, labor and overhead.    If the market value of our products were to decrease due to changing market conditions, the Company could be at risk of incurring the cost of additional reserves to adjust inventory value to a market value lower than stated cost.

 

34


Table of Contents

Description

  

Judgments and Uncertainties

  

Effect if Actual Results Differ From
Assumptions

Inventory is reviewed to ensure that an adequate provision is recognized for excess, slow moving and obsolete inventories.

   The Company compares inventory components to prior year sales history and current backlog and anticipated future requirements. To the extent that inventory parts exceed estimated usage and demand, a reserve is recognized to reduce the carrying value of inventory. Also, specific reserves are established for known inventory obsolescence.    If our estimates regarding sales and backlog requirements are inaccurate, we may be exposed to the expense of increasing our reserves for slow moving and obsolete inventory.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangibles:

     

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles are required to be tested for impairment at least annually. The Company performs its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter and more frequently when indicators of impairment are present. The Company reviews goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. The Company’s reporting units are the same as its reportable segments. The evaluation of impairment involves comparing the current fair value of the business to the recorded value (including goodwill).

   We use a combination of a guideline public company market approach and a discounted cash flow model (“DCF model”) to determine the current fair value of the business. A number of significant assumptions and estimates are involved in the application of the DCF model to forecast operating cash flows, including markets and market share, sales volume and pricing, costs to produce and working capital changes. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company used a discount rate for each of it reporting units ranging from 14% to 20% and a terminal growth of 3%. The difference in discount rates is based on the underlying markets and risks associated with each reporting unit.   

Management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values of its business are estimated. However, actual amounts realized may differ from those used to evaluate the impairment of goodwill.

 

If actual results are not consistent with our assumptions and judgments used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair values, we may be exposed to additional impairment losses that could be material to our results of operations.

Warranty Reserves:

     

The Company provides warranty reserves to cover expected costs from repairing or replacing products with durability, quality or workmanship issues occurring during established warranty periods.

   In general, reserves are provided for as a percentage of sales, based on historical experience. In addition, specific reserves are established for known warranty issues and their estimable losses.    If actual results are not consistent with the assumptions and judgments used to calculate our warranty liability, the Company may be at risk of realizing material gains or losses.

 

35


Table of Contents

Description

  

Judgments and Uncertainties

  

Effect if Actual Results Differ From
Assumptions

Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits:

     

These amounts are determined using actuarial methodologies and incorporate significant assumptions, including the rate used to discount the future estimated liability, the long-term rate of return on plan assets and several assumptions relating to the employee workforce (salary increases, medical costs, retirement age and mortality).

  

Significant judgments and estimates are used in determining the liabilities and expenses for pensions and other postretirement benefits.

 

The rate used to discount future estimated liabilities is determined considering the rates available at year-end on debt instruments that could be used to settle the obligations of the plan. The long-term rate of return is estimated by considering historical returns and expected returns on current and projected asset allocations and is generally applied to a five-year average market value of assets.

   If assumptions used in determining the pension and other postretirement benefits change significantly, these costs can fluctuate materially from period to period.

Income Taxes:

     

Wabtec records an estimated liability or benefit for income and other taxes based on what it determines will likely be paid in various tax jurisdictions in which it operates in accordance with ASC 740-10 Accounting for Income Taxes and Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.

  

The estimate of our tax obligations are uncertain because Management must use judgment to estimate the exposures associated with our various filing positions, as well as realization of our deferred tax assets.

 

ASC 740-10 establishes a recognition and measurement threshold to determine the amount of tax benefit that should be recognized related to uncertain tax positions.

  

Management uses its best judgment in the determination of these amounts. However, the liabilities ultimately realized and paid are dependent on various matters including the resolution of the tax audits in the various affected tax jurisdictions and may differ from the amounts recorded.

 

An adjustment to the estimated liability would be recorded through income in the period in which it becomes probable that the amount of the actual liability differs from the recorded amount.

 

A deferred tax valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Revenue Recognition:

     

Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC-605 “Revenue Recognition.”

   Revenue is recognized when products have been shipped to the respective customers, title has passed and the price for the product has been determined.    Should market conditions and customer demands dictate changes to our standard shipping terms, the Company may be impacted by longer than typical revenue recognition cycles.

 

36


Table of Contents

Description

  

Judgments and Uncertainties

  

Effect if Actual Results Differ From
Assumptions

The Company recognizes revenues on long-term contracts based on the percentage of completion method of accounting. The units-of-delivery method or other input-based or output-based measures, as appropriate, are used to measure the progress toward completion of individual contracts. Contract revenues and cost estimates are reviewed and revised at a minimum quarterly and adjustments are reflected in the accounting period as such amounts are determined.

   For long-term contracts, revenues and cost estimates are reviewed and revised at a minimum quarterly and adjustments are reflected in the accounting period as such amounts are determined.    Provisions are made currently for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts.

Certain pre-production costs relating to long term production and supply contracts have been deferred and will be recognized over the life of the contracts.

   Pre-production costs are recognized over the expected life of the contract usually based on the Company’s progress toward the estimated number of units expected to be delivered under the production or supply contract.    A charge to expense for unrecognized portions of pre-production costs could be realized if the Company’s estimate of the number of units to be delivered changes or the underlying contract is cancelled.

 

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk

In the ordinary course of business, Wabtec is exposed to risks that increases in interest rates may adversely affect funding costs associated with its variable-rate debt. The Company’s variable rate debt represents 38% and 61% of total long-term debt at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. On an annual basis a 1% change in the interest rate for variable rate debt at December 31, 2009 would increase or decrease interest expense by $1.5 million.

To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on a portion of this variable-rate debt, the Company entered into an interest rate swap which effectively converted a portion of the debt from variable to fixed-rate borrowing during the term of the swap contract. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty. However, since only the cash interest payments are exchanged, exposure is significantly less than the notional amount. The counterparty is a large financial institution and the Company does not anticipate nonperformance. The Company concluded that the interest rate swap agreement qualifies for special cash flow hedge accounting which permits the recording of the fair value of the interest rate swap agreement and corresponding adjustment to other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement with a notional value of $92.5 million and which effectively changed the Company’s interest rate on bank debt at December 31, 2009 from a variable rate to a fixed rate of 1.84%. The interest rate swap agreement matures in January 2010. As of December 31, 2009, the Company recorded a current liability of $63,000 and a corresponding offset in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $38,000, net of tax.

 

37


Table of Contents

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

The Company has entered into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the impact of changes in currency exchange rates. Forward contracts are agreements with a counterparty to exchange two distinct currencies at a set exchange rate for delivery on a set date at some point in the future. There is no exchange of funds until the delivery date. At the delivery date the Company can either take delivery of the currency or settle on a net basis.

We occasionally enter into several types of financial instruments for the purpose of managing our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in countries in which we have significant operations. As of December 31, 2009, we had several such instruments outstanding to hedge currency rate fluctuation in 2010.

At December 31, 2009, the Company had forward contracts for the sale of South African Rand (ZAR) and the purchase of U.S. Dollars (USD). The Company concluded that these foreign currency forward contracts qualify for cash flow hedge accounting which permits the recording of the fair value of the forward contract and corresponding adjustment to other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had forward contracts with a notional value of $10.1 million ZAR (or $1.2 million U.S.) with an average exchange rate of $8.21 ZAR per $1 USD, resulting in the recording of a current liability of $110,000 and a corresponding offset in accumulated other comprehensive income of $70,000, net of tax.

At December 31, 2008, the Company had forward contracts for the sale of South African Rand (ZAR) and the purchase of U.S. Dollars (USD). The Company concluded that these foreign currency forward contracts qualify for cash flow hedge accounting which permits the recording of the fair value of the forward contract and corresponding adjustment to other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had forward contracts with a notional value of $5.0 million ZAR (or $557,000 U.S.) with an average exchange rate of $8.97 ZAR per $1 USD, resulting in the recording of a current asset of $41,000 and a corresponding offset in accumulated other comprehensive income of $26,000, net of tax.

We are also subject to certain risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates to the extent our operations are conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. For the year ended December 31, 2009, approximately 60% of Wabtec’s net sales were to the United States, 10% to Canada, 2% to Mexico, 4% to Australia, 2% to Germany, 10% to the United Kingdom, and 12% in other international locations. (See Note 20 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report).

Our market risk exposure is not substantially different from our exposure at December 31, 2008.

 

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Financial statements and supplementary data are set forth in Item 15, of Part IV hereof.

 

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There have been no disagreements with our independent public accountants.

 

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Wabtec’s principal executive officer and its principal financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of Wabtec’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of December 31, 2009. Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that

 

38


Table of Contents

Wabtec’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by Wabtec in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by Wabtec in such reports is accumulated and communicated to Wabtec’s Management, including its principal executive officer and principal finance officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in Wabtec’s “internal control over financial reporting” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2009, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Wabtec’s internal control over financial reporting. Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting and the attestation report of the registered public accounting firm are included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appears on page 44 and is incorporated herein by reference.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Ernst & Young’s attestation report on internal control over financial reporting appears on page 46 and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

 

39


Table of Contents

PART III

Items 10 through 14.

In accordance with the provisions of General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required by Item 10 (Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance), Item 11 (Executive Compensation), Item 12 (Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters), Item 13 (Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence) and Item 14 (Principal Accounting Fees and Services) is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 12, 2010, except for the Equity Compensation Plan Information required by Item 12, which is set forth in the table below. The definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2009. Information relating to the executive officers of the Company is set forth in Part I.

Wabtec has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Officers which is applicable to all of our executive officers. As described in Item 1 of this report the Code of Ethics for Senior Officers is posted on our website at www.wabtec.com. In the event that we make any amendments to or waivers from this code, we will disclose the amendment or waiver and the reasons for such on our website.

This table provides aggregate information as of December 31, 2009 concerning equity awards under Wabtec’s compensation plans and arrangements.

 

     (a)    (b)    (c)

Plan Category

   Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
   Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options warrants
and rights
   Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

   1,119,253    $ 23.89    1,194,189

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

   —        —      —  
                

Total

   1,119,253    $ 23.89    1,194,189
                

 

40


Table of Contents

PART IV

 

Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The financial statements, financial statement schedules and exhibits listed below are filed as part of this annual report:

 

              

Page

(a)

        
   (1)    Financial Statements and Reports on Internal Control   
     

Management’s Reports to Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation Shareholders

   44
     

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   45
     

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

   46
     

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008

   47
     

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

   48
     

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

  

49

     

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

   50
     

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

   51
   (2)    Financial Statement Schedules   
     

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

  

89

              

Filing
Method

(b)         
      Exhibits   
     2.1    Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended (originally included as Annex A to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus)    3
     3.1    Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated January 30, 1995, as amended March 30, 1995    2
     3.2    Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company, effective December 13, 2007    7
     4.1(a)    Indenture with the Bank of New York as Trustee dated as of August 6, 2003    5
     4.1(b)    Resolutions Adopted July 23, 2003 by the Board of Directors establishing the terms of the offering of up to $150,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.875% Notes due 2013    5
     4.2    Purchase Agreement, dated July 23, 2003, by and between the Company and the initial purchasers    5
     4.3    Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 6, 2003    5
   10.1    Indemnification Agreement dated January 31, 1995 between the Company and the Voting Trust Trustees    2

 

41


Table of Contents
             

Filing
Method

  10.2    Agreement of Sale and Purchase of the North American Operations of the Railway Products Group, an operating division of American Standard Inc. (now known as Trane), dated as of 1990 between Rail Acquisition Corp. and American Standard Inc. (only provisions on indemnification are reproduced)    2
  10.3    Letter Agreement (undated) between the Company and American Standard Inc. (now known as Trane) on environmental costs and sharing    2
  10.4    Purchase Agreement dated as of June 17, 1992 among the Company, Schuller International, Inc., Manville Corporation and European Overseas Corporation (only provisions on indemnification are reproduced)    2
  10.5    Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of January 23, 1995 among the Company, Pulse Acquisition Corporation, Pulse Electronics, Inc., Pulse Embedded Computer Systems, Inc. and the Pulse Shareholders (Schedules and Exhibits omitted)    2
  10.6    Letter Agreement dated as of January 19, 1995 between the Company and Vestar Capital Partners, Inc.      2
  10.7    Westinghouse Air Brake Company 1995 Non-Employee Directors’ Fee and Stock Option Plan, as amended    9
  10.8    Letter Agreement dated as of January 1, 1995 between the Company and Vestar Capital Partners, Inc.      2
  10.9    Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and Authorized Representatives    2
  10.10    Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended    9
  10.11    Asset Purchase Agreement, by and between General Electric Company, through its GE Transportation Systems business and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation, dated as of July 24, 2001    4
  10.12    Sale and Purchase Agreement, by and between Rütgers Rail S.p.A. and the Company, dated August 12, 2004    6
  10.13    Amendment Agreement dated January 28, 2005 by and among Rütgers Rail S.p.A., the Company, CoFren S.r.l. and RFPC Holding Company to the Sale and Purchase Agreement dated August 12, 2004    6
  10.14    Employment Agreement with Albert J. Neupaver, dated February 1, 2006 *    8
  10.15    Restricted Stock Agreement with Albert J. Neupaver, dated February 1, 2006 *    8
  10.16    Stock Purchase Agreement, by and among Wabtec Holding Company, certain shareholders of Schaefer Manufacturing, Inc. and CCP Limited Partnership, dated October 6, 2006    10
  10.17    Share Purchase Agreement, by and between BBA Holding Deutschland GmbH and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation, dated November 27, 2006 (Exhibits and Schedules omitted, but will be provided to the Commission upon request)    11
  10.18    Share Purchase Agreement dated as of June 8, 2007 among the Company, RICON Acquisition Corp., RICON Corp., CGW Southeast Partners IV, L.P. and William L. Baldwin    12
  10.19    Stock Purchase Agreement, by and between the Company and Polinvest S.r.l., dated May 16, 2008    13

 

42


Table of Contents
             

Filing
Method

  10.20    Stock Purchase Agreement, by and among the Company, Standard Car Truck Company and Robclif, Inc., dated September 12, 2008    14
  10.21    Refinancing Credit Agreement by and among the Company, the Guarantors, various lenders, PNC Bank, National Association, PNC Capital Markets LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., RBS Greenwich Capital, JP Morgan Chase Bank, Bank of America, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, the Bank of Nova Scotia and First Commonwealth Bank, dated as of November 4, 2008    1
  10.22    Form of Employment Continuation Agreement entered into by the Company with Albert J. Neupaver, Alvaro Garcia-Tunon, Charles F. Kovac, Raymond T. Betler, Richard A. Mathes, R. Mark Cox, Scott E. Wahlstrom and Timothy R. Wesley *    15
  21    List of subsidiaries of the Company    1
  23.1    Consent of Ernst & Young LLP    1
  31.1    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications    1
  31.2    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications    1
  32.1    Section 1350 Certifications    1

 

1 Filed herewith.
2 Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-90866).
3 Filed as part of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-88903).
4 Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 13, 2001.
5 Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-110600).
6 Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004.
7 Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 13, 2007.
8 Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006
9 Filed as an Annex to the Company’s Schedule 14A Proxy Statement filed on April 13, 2006.
10 Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006.
11 Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006.
12 Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007.
13 Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008.
14 Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008.
15 Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009.

 

* Management contract or compensatory plan.

 

43


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S REPORTS TO WABTEC SHAREHOLDERS

Management’s Report on Financial Statements and Practices

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) were prepared by Management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. The statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and include amounts that are based on Management’s best judgments and estimates. The other financial information included in the 10-K is consistent with that in the financial statements.

Management also recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs according to the highest standards of personal and corporate conduct. This responsibility is characterized and reflected in key policy statements issued from time to time regarding, among other things, conduct of its business activities within the laws of host countries in which the Company operates and potentially conflicting outside business interests of its employees. The Company maintains a systematic program to assess compliance with these policies.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Management has conducted an assessment, including testing, using the criteria in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management has excluded Unifin International LP, and its affiliate, Cardinal Pumps and Exchangers, Inc. (Unifin) from its assessment of internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 because Unifin was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination effective October 1, 2009. Unifin is a wholly owned subsidiaries whose total assets represents 12.4% and net income represents 0.8%, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Based on its assessment, Management has concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

 

44


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

As explained in Note 11 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”, for the year ended December 31, 2007 the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”, subsequently codified in Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” of the Accounting Standards Codification. As explained in Note 2 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”, for the year ended December 31, 2009 the Company adopted the December 2007 amendment to Accounting Standard Codification Topic 810, “Consolidation.”

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 24, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

February 24, 2010

 

45


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation:

We have audited Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Unifin International LP, and its affiliate, Cardinal Pumps and Exchangers, Inc. (Unifin), which is included in the 2009 consolidated financial statements of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and constituted 12.4% of total assets as of December 31, 2009, and 0.8% of net income for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Unifin.

In our opinion, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and our report dated February 24, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

February 24, 2010

 

46


Table of Contents

WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

     December 31,  

In thousands, except share and par value

   2009     2008  
Assets     

Current Assets

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 188,659      $ 141,805   

Accounts receivable

     208,260        273,560   

Inventories

     239,333        264,158   

Deferred income taxes

     40,533        31,133   

Other

     12,724        14,693   
                

Total current assets

     689,509        725,349   

Property, plant and equipment

     451,996        431,604   

Accumulated depreciation

     (250,289     (224,056
                

Property, plant and equipment, net

     201,707        207,548   

Other Assets

    

Goodwill

     482,978        319,449   

Other intangibles, net

     187,630        236,740   

Deferred income taxes

     4,964        1,052   

Other noncurrent assets

     19,047        17,382   
                

Total other assets

     694,619        574,623   
                

Total Assets

   $ 1,585,835      $ 1,507,520   
                
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity     

Current Liabilities

    

Accounts payable

   $ 119,895      $ 162,633   

Customer deposits

     44,251        80,353   

Accrued compensation

     30,423        36,483   

Accrued warranty

     20,025        20,933   

Current portion of long-term debt

     32,741        30,381   

Commitments and contingencies

     373        451   

Other accrued liabilities

     57,640        56,817   
                

Total current liabilities

     305,348        388,051   

Long-term debt

     359,039        356,699   

Reserve for postretirement and pension benefits

     64,078        69,343   

Deferred income taxes

     52,156        12,870   

Commitments and contingencies

     1,110        1,019   

Accrued warranty

     9,182        9,743   

Other long-term liabilities

     16,009        23,988   
                

Total liabilities

     806,922        861,713   

Shareholders’ Equity

    

Preferred stock, 1,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued

     —          —     

Common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized: 66,174,767 shares issued and 47,688,695 and 47,907,357 outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively

     662        662   

Additional paid-in capital

     329,707        328,587   

Treasury stock, at cost, 18,486,072 and 18,267,410 shares, at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively

     (289,137     (276,421

Retained earnings

     766,221        653,083   

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (30,546     (60,540
                

Total Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation shareholders’ equity

     776,907        645,371   

Non-controlling interest

     2,006        436   
                

Total shareholders’ equity

     778,913        645,807   
                

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

   $ 1,585,835      $ 1,507,520   
                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

47


Table of Contents

WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

     Year ended December 31,  

In thousands, except per share data

   2009     2008     2007  

Net sales

   $ 1,401,616      $ 1,574,749      $ 1,360,088   

Cost of sales

     (1,008,290     (1,147,563     (990,469
                        

Gross profit

     393,326        427,186        369,619   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

     (160,998     (170,597     (148,437

Engineering expenses

     (42,447     (38,981     (37,434

Amortization expense

     (9,849     (5,092     (4,007
                        

Total operating expenses

     (213,294     (214,670     (189,878

Income from operations

     180,032        212,516        179,741   

Other income and expenses

      

Interest expense, net

     (16,674     (8,508     (3,637

Other income (expense), net

     1        292        (3,650
                        

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

     163,359        204,300        172,454   

Income tax expense

     (48,304     (73,746     (63,067
                        

Income from continuing operations

     115,055        130,554        109,387   

Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of tax)

     —          (3     183   
                        

Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders

   $ 115,055      $ 130,551      $ 109,570   
                        

Earnings Per Common Share

      

Basic

      

Income from continuing operations

   $ 2.41      $ 2.69      $ 2.25   

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

     —          —          0.01   
                        

Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders

   $ 2.41      $ 2.69      $ 2.26   
                        

Diluted

      

Income from continuing operations

   $ 2.39      $ 2.66      $ 2.24   

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

     —          —          —     
                        

Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders

   $ 2.39      $ 2.66      $ 2.24   
                        

Weighted average shares outstanding

      

Basic

     47,499        48,232        48,263   

Diluted

     47,977        48,847        48,873   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

48


Table of Contents

WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

     Year Ended December 31,  

In thousands

   2009     2008     2007  

Operating Activities

      

Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders

   $ 115,055      $ 130,551      $ 109,570   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operations:

      

Depreciation and amortization

     35,519        29,826        29,140   

Stock-based compensation expense

     3,620        10,475        11,252   

Deferred income taxes

     7,391        4,870        (2,278

(Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment

     (2,913     2,647        4,324   

Excess income tax benefits from exercise of stock options

     (1,906     (1,922     (2,098

Discontinued operations

     —          (38     (232

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions

      

Accounts receivable

     80,541        (20,841     (31,568

Inventories

     33,360        (42,726     (14,317

Accounts payable

     (48,238     14,303        32,759   

Accrued income taxes

     841        (511     13,513   

Accrued liabilities and customer deposits

     (56,203     31,512        (4,308

Other assets and liabilities

     (6,546     1,238        (3,248
                        

Net cash provided by operating activities

     160,521        159,384        142,509   

Investing Activities

      

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

     (18,288     (19,715     (19,665

Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment

     4,091        447        127   

Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired

     (96,283     (398,132     (73,642

Acquisition purchase price adjustments

     (4,741     (41     (754

Discontinued operations

     —          —          398   
                        

Net cash used for investing activities

     (115,221     (417,441     (93,536

Financing Activities

      

Proceeds from debt

     197,500        236,000        —     

Payments of debt

     (193,324     (385     (657

Debt financing costs

     —          (2,858     —     

Stock repurchase

     (19,654     (45,796     (17,888

Proceeds from exercise of stock options and other benefit plans

     2,532        2,768        5,406   

Excess income tax benefits from exercise of stock options

     1,906        1,922        2,098   

Cash dividends ($0.04 per share for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007)

     (1,917     (1,940     (1,944
                        

Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities

     (12,957     189,711        (12,985

Effect of changes in currency exchange rates

     14,511        (24,538     10,722   
                        

Increase/(decrease) in cash

     46,854        (92,884     46,710   

Cash, beginning of year

     141,805        234,689        187,979   
                        

Cash, end of year

   $ 188,659      $ 141,805      $ 234,689   
                        

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

49


Table of Contents

WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

In thousands, except share and per share data

  Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
    Common
Stock
Shares
  Common
Stock
Amount
  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
    Treasury
Stock
Shares
    Treasury
Stock
Amount
    Retained
Earnings
    Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
    Total  

Balance, December 31, 2006

    66,174,767   $ 662   $ 314,752      (17,923,991   $ (232,823   $ 419,603      $ (32,305   $ 469,889   

Adjustment to Beginning Retained Earnings due to adoption of FIN 48

                (2,691       (2,691

Cash dividends ($0.04 dividend per share)

                (1,944       (1,944

Proceeds from treasury stock issued from the exercise of stock options and other benefit plans, net of tax

          (5,076   957,368        12,580            7,504   

Stock-based Compensation

          11,252                11,252   

Net income

  $ 109,570                  109,570          109,570   

Translation adjustment

    29,554                    29,554        29,554   

Unrealized gains on foreign exchange contracts, net of $475 tax

    825                    825        825   

Change in pension and post retirement benefit plans, net of $7,008 tax

    11,197                    11,197        11,197   
                       

Stock Repurchase

          (509,800     (17,888         (17,888

Total comprehensive income

  $ 151,146                   
                                                               

Balance, December 31, 2007

    66,174,767   $ 662   $ 320,928      (17,476,423   $ (238,131   $ 524,538      $ 9,271      $ 617,268   

Adjustment to Beginning Retained Earnings due to adoption of FAS 158

                (66       (66

Cash dividends ($0.04 dividend per share)

                (1,940       (1,940

Proceeds from treasury stock issued from the exercise of stock options and other benefit plans, net of tax

          (2,816   526,913        7,506            4,690   

Stock-based Compensation

          10,475                10,475   

Net income

  $ 130,551                  130,551          130,551   

Translation adjustment

    (59,722                 (59,722     (59,722

Unrealized gains on foreign exchange contracts, net of $15 tax

    26                    26        26   

Change in pension and post retirement benefit plans, net of $4,493 tax

    (10,115                 (10,115     (10,115
                       

Stock Repurchase

          (1,317,900     (45,796         (45,796

Total comprehensive income

  $ 60,740                   
                                                               

Balance, December 31, 2008

    66,174,767   $ 662   $ 328,587      (18,267,410   $ (276,421   $ 653,083      $ (60,540   $ 645,371   

Cash dividends ($0.04 dividend per share)

                (1,917       (1,917

Proceeds from treasury stock issued from the exercise of stock options and other benefit plans, net of tax

          (2,500   451,038        6,938            4,438   

Stock-based Compensation

          3,620                3,620   

Net income

  $ 115,055                  115,055          115,055   

Translation adjustment

    32,040                    32,040        32,040   

Unrealized (loss) on foreign exchange contracts, net of $55 tax

    (96                 (96     (96

Unrealized (loss) on interest rate swap contracts, net of $25 tax

    (38                 (38     (38

Change in pension and post retirement benefit plans, net of $2,583 tax

    (1,912                 (1,912     (1,912
                       

Stock Repurchase

          (669,700     (19,654         (19,654

Total comprehensive income

  $ 145,049                   
                                                               

Balance, December 31, 2009

    66,174,767   $ 662   $ 329,707      (18,486,072   $ (289,137   $ 766,221      $ (30,546   $ 776,907   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements

 

50


Table of Contents

WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1. BUSINESS

Wabtec is one of the world’s largest providers of value-added, technology-based products and services for the global rail industry. Our products are found on virtually all U.S. locomotives, freight cars and passenger transit vehicles, as well as in approximately 100 countries throughout the world. Our products enhance safety, improve productivity and reduce maintenance costs for customers, and many of our core products and services are essential in the safe and efficient operation of freight rail and passenger transit vehicles. Wabtec is a global company with operations in 17 countries. In 2009, about 40% of the Company’s revenues came from customers outside the U.S.

 

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority owned subsidiaries. Such statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Sales between subsidiaries are billed at prices consistent with sales to third parties and are eliminated in consolidation.

Subsequent Events In preparing the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements, the Company has reviewed, as determined necessary by the Company’s management, events that have occurred after December 31, 2009 until February 24, 2010, the issuance date of the financial statements.

Accounting Standards Codification The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) became effective on July 1, 2009. At that date, the ASC became FASB’s officially recognized source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applicable to all public and non-public non-governmental entities, superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) and related literature. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other accounting literature is considered non-authoritative. The switch to the ASC affects the way companies refer to U.S. GAAP in financial statements and accounting policies. Citing particular content in the ASC involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content through the Topic, Subtopic, Section and Paragraph structure.

Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents are highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts The allowance for doubtful accounts receivable reflects our best estimate of probable losses inherent in our receivable portfolio determined on the basis of historical experience, specific allowances for known troubled accounts and other currently available evidence. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $7.3 million and $5.0 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined under the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Inventory costs include material, labor and overhead.

Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment additions are stated at cost. Expenditures for renewals and improvements are capitalized. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. The Company provides for book depreciation principally on the straight-line method. Accelerated depreciation methods are utilized for income tax purposes.

Leasing Arrangements The Company conducts a portion of its operations from leased facilities and finances certain equipment purchases through lease agreements. In those cases in which the lease term approximates the useful life of the leased asset or the lease meets certain other prerequisites, the leasing arrangement is classified as a capital lease. The remaining arrangements are treated as operating leases.

 

51


Table of Contents

Intangible Assets Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. Other intangibles (with definite lives) are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives. Amortizable intangible assets are reviewed for impairment when indicators of impairment are present. The Company tests goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually. The Company performs its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter after the annual forecasting process is completed, and is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Periodically, Management of the Company assesses whether or not an indicator of impairment is present that would necessitate a goodwill impairment analysis be performed.

The goodwill impairment analysis is performed by comparing the carrying amount of the reporting unit to its estimated fair value and to the extent that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, the reporting unit’s carrying value of goodwill is compared to the implied fair value of goodwill. To the extent that the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, impairment exists and must be recognized.

The Company reviews goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. The Company’s reporting units are the same as its reportable segments. The Company prepares its goodwill impairment analysis by comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit, using an income approach (a discounted cash flow model) as well as a market approach, with its carrying value. The income approach and the market approach are equally weighted in arriving at fair value, which the Company has applied consistently.

The discounted cash flow model requires several assumptions including future sales growth, EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) margins and capital expenditures for the reporting units. The discounted cash flow model also requires the use of a discount rate and a terminal revenue growth rate (the revenue growth rate for the period beyond the three years forecasted by the reporting units), as well as projections of future operating margins. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company used a discount rate for each of its reporting units ranging from 14% to 20% and a terminal revenue growth rate of 3%. The difference in the discount rates is based on the underlying markets and risks associated with each of the Company’s reporting units.

The market approach requires several assumptions including EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) multiples for comparable companies that operate in the same markets as the Company’s reporting units. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company used EBITDA multiples for its reporting units ranging from 6.5 to 7.5. The difference in the EBITDA multiples is due to the underlying markets associated with each of the Company’s reporting units.

The fair value of the Freight and Transit segments exceeded the carrying value of each reporting unit by more than 10%.

Warranty Costs Warranty costs are accrued based on Management’s estimates of repair or upgrade costs per unit and historical experience. Warranty expense was $20.4 million, $17.1 million and $10.4 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Warranty reserves were $29.2 million and $30.7 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws. The provision for income taxes includes federal, state and foreign income taxes.

Stock-Based Compensation The Company recognizes compensation expense for stock-based compensation based on the grant date fair value. This expense must be recognized ratably over the requisite service period following the date of grant.

 

52


Table of Contents

Financial Derivatives and Hedging Activities The Company has entered into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the impact of changes in currency exchange rates. Forward contracts are agreements with a counterparty to exchange two distinct currencies at a set exchange rate for delivery on a set date at some point in the future. There is no exchange of funds until the delivery date. At the delivery date the Company can either take delivery of the currency or settle on a net basis.

At December 31, 2009, the Company had forward contracts for the sale of South African Rand (ZAR) and the purchase of U.S. Dollars (USD). The Company concluded that these foreign currency forward contracts qualify for cash flow hedge accounting which permits the recording of the fair value of the forward contract and corresponding adjustment to other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had forward contracts with a notional value of $10.1 million ZAR (or $1.2 million U.S.) with an average exchange rate of $8.21 ZAR per $1 USD, resulting in the recording of a current liability of $110,000 and a corresponding offset in accumulated other comprehensive income of $70,000, net of tax.

At December 31, 2008, the Company had forward contracts for the sale of South African Rand (ZAR) and the purchase of U.S. Dollars (USD). The Company concluded that these foreign currency forward contracts qualify for cash flow hedge accounting which permits the recording of the fair value of the forward contract and corresponding adjustment to other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had forward contracts with a notional value of $5.0 million ZAR (or $557,000 U.S.) with an average exchange rate of $8.97 ZAR per $1 USD, resulting in the recording of a current asset of $41,000 and a corresponding offset in accumulated other comprehensive income of $26,000, net of tax.

To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on a portion of this variable-rate debt, the Company entered into an interest rate swap which effectively converted a portion of the debt from variable to fixed-rate borrowing during the term of the swap contract. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty. However, since only the cash interest payments are exchanged, exposure is significantly less than the notional amount. The counterparty is a large financial institution and the Company does not anticipate nonperformance. The Company concluded that the interest rate swap agreement qualifies for special cash flow hedge accounting which permits the recording of the fair value of the interest rate swap agreement and corresponding adjustment to other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement with a notional value of $92.5 million and which effectively changed the Company’s interest rate on bank debt at December 31, 2009 from a variable rate to a fixed rate of 1.84%. The interest rate swap agreement matures in January 2010. As of December 31, 2009, the Company recorded a current liability of $63,000 and a corresponding offset in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $38,000, net of tax.

Foreign Currency Translation Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries, except for the Company’s Mexican operations whose functional currency is the U.S. Dollar, are translated at the rate of exchange in effect on the balance sheet date while income and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Foreign currency gains and losses resulting from transactions, and the translation of financial statements are recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements based upon the provisions of ASC 830, “Foreign Currency Matters.” The effects of currency exchange rate changes on intercompany transactions and balances of a long-term investment nature are accumulated and carried as a component of shareholders’ equity. The effects of currency exchange rate changes on intercompany transactions that are denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency are charged or credited to earnings. Foreign exchange transaction losses recognized in other (expense) income, net were $1.3 million, $0.4 million and $3.2 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Noncontrolling Interests On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the amendment under ASC 810 “Consolidation” related to noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. This amendment establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the

 

53


Table of Contents

deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The amendment clarifies that a noncontrolling interest should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements and requires net income attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be disclosed separately on the face of the consolidated statement of income. The presentation and disclosure requirements of the amendment require retrospective application to all prior periods presented. In accordance with ASC 810, the Company classified noncontrolling interests as equity on our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was not material.

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as net income and all other non-owner changes in shareholders’ equity. The Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income consists of foreign currency translation adjustments, foreign currency hedges, foreign exchange contracts, interest rate swaps, and pension and post retirement related adjustments.

Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 605 “Revenue Recognition.” Revenue is recognized when products have been shipped to the respective customers, title has passed and the price for the product has been determined.

The Company recognizes revenues on long-term contracts based on the percentage of completion method of accounting. The units-of-delivery method or other input-based or output-based measures, as appropriate, are used to measure the progress toward completion of individual contracts. Contract revenues and cost estimates are reviewed and revised at a minimum quarterly and adjustments are reflected in the accounting period as such amounts are determined. Provisions are made currently for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts.

Certain pre-production costs relating to long-term production and supply contracts have been deferred and will be recognized over the life of the contracts. Deferred pre-production costs were $12.1 million and $11.0 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Significant Customers and Concentrations of Credit Risk The Company’s trade receivables are from rail and transit industry original equipment manufacturers, Class I railroads, railroad carriers and commercial companies that utilize rail cars in their operations, such as utility and chemical companies. No one customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s consolidated net sales in 2009, 2008 and 2007.

Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs All fees billed to the customer for shipping and handling are classified as a component of net revenues. All costs associated with shipping and handling is classified as a component of cost of sales.

Research and Development Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company incurred costs of approximately $42.4 million, $39.0 million and $37.4 million, respectively.

Employees As of December 31, 2009, approximately 37% of the Company’s workforce was covered by collective bargaining agreements. These agreements are generally effective through 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. Agreements expiring in 2010 cover approximately 21% of the Company’s workforce.

Earnings Per Share Basic and diluted earnings per common share is computed in accordance with ASC 260 “Earnings Per Share.” Unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method included in ASC 260-10-55. (See Note 12 “Earnings Per Share” included herein)

Reclassifications Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified, where necessary, to conform to the current year presentation.

 

54


Table of Contents

Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from the estimates. On an ongoing basis, Management reviews its estimates based on currently available information. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements In December 2007, updates were made to ASC 805, “Business Combinations” and ASC 810-10-65, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.” The update to ASC 805 retains the fundamental requirements, but also broadens its scope by applying the acquisition method to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses, and requires, among other things, that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be measured at fair value as of the acquisition date, that liabilities related to contingent consideration be recognized at the acquisition date and remeasured at fair value in each subsequent reporting period, that acquisition-related costs be expensed as incurred, and that income be recognized if the fair value of the net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred. The update to ASC 810-10-65 establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests (i.e., minority interests) in a subsidiary, including changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary and requires, among other things, that noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries be classified as a separate component of equity. Except for the presentation and disclosure requirements of the update to ASC 810-10-65, which are to be applied retrospectively for all periods presented, the updates to ASC 805 and ASC 810-10-65 are to be applied prospectively in financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. This updated standard was effective for the Company for business combination transactions for which the acquisition date was on or after January 1, 2009. The adoption of this updated standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

In June 2008, an update was made to ASC 260-10-55 “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” The update to ASC 260-10-55 states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. ASC 260-10-55 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. Upon adoption, a company is required to retrospectively adjust its earnings per share data (including any amounts related to interim periods, summaries of earnings and selected financial data) to conform with the updates of ASC 260-10-55. The Company adopted the updated ASC 260-10-55 as of January 1, 2009, and has computed earnings per share based on the two-class method. (See Note 12 “Earnings Per Share” included herein).

In December 2008, an update was made to ASC 720-20-65, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.” The update to ASC 720-20-65 amends ASC 230-10-55, “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits”, to provide guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The additional disclosure requirements under the updated ASC 720-20-65 include expanded disclosures about an entity’s investment policies and strategies, the categories of plan assets, concentrations of credit risk and fair value measurements of plan assets. The adoption of this updated standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

In May 2009, and update was made to ASC 855, “Subsequent Events”. The update to ASC 855 requires an entity to recognize in the financial statements the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet. For non-recognized subsequent events that must be disclosed to keep the financial statements from being misleading, an entity will be required to disclose the nature of the event as well as an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. In addition, the update to ASC 855 requires an entity to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The company adopted the updated ASC 855 in second quarter 2009. (See “Subsequent Events” above).

 

55


Table of Contents

In June 2009, the FASB issued Update No. 2009-01, “Topic 105-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles amendments based on Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168-The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (ASU 2009-01). ASU 2009-01 establishes only two levels of GAAP, authoritative and nonauthoritative. The switch to the ASC affects the way companies refer to U.S. GAAP in financial statements and accounting policies. Citing particular content in the ASC involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content through the Topic, Subtopic, Section and Paragraph structure. The Company began using the new guidelines and number system prescribed by the ASC when referring to GAAP in the third quarter 2009. As the ASC was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, and adoption of this standard did not have any impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

In June 2009, an update was made to ASC 860 “Transfers and Servicing.” Among other items, the update removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and clarifies that the objective of ASC 860 is to determine whether a transferor and all of the entities included in the transferor’s financial statements being presented have surrendered control over transferred financial assets. The update is effective January 1, 2010. Upon adoption, the Company does not expect this update to have a material impact on its financial condition and results of operations.

In June 2009, an update was made to ASC 810 “Consolidation.” This update amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities and is effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. Upon adoption, the Company does not expect this update to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

In August 2009, the FASB issued Update No. 2009-05, “Fair Value measurement and Disclosures (Topic 820)—Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value” (ASU 2009-05). ASU 2009-05 amends ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” to provide further guidance on how to measure the fair value of a liability. It primarily does three things: 1) sets forth the types of valuation techniques to be used to value a liability when a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, 2) clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability and 3) clarifies that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. ASU 2009-05 is effective beginning fourth quarter of 2009 for the Company. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

In October 2009, the FASB issued Update No. 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605)—Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (ASU 2009-13). ASU 2009-13 provides amendments to the criteria in ASC 605-25 for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. As a result of those amendments, multiple-deliverable arrangements will be separated in more circumstances than under existing U.S. GAAP. ASU 2009-13: 1) establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, 2) eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method, 3) requires that a vendor determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner that is consistent with that used to determine the price to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis, 4) significantly expands the disclosures related to a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2009-13.

In October 2009, the FASB issued Update No. 2009-14, “Software (Topic 985)—Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (ASU 2009-14). ASU 2009-14 changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible

 

56


Table of Contents

products and software elements and provides additional guidance on how to determine which software, if any, relating to tangible product would be excluded from the scope of the software revenue guidance. In addition, ASU 2009-14 provides guidance on how a vendor should allocate arrangement consideration to deliverables in an arrangement that includes both tangible products and software. ASU 2009-14 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2009-14.

 

3. ACQUISITIONS AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On October 1, 2009, the Company used cash on hand to acquire Unifin International LP, and its affiliate, Cardinal Pumps and Exchangers, Inc. (“Unifin”), a manufacturer of cooling systems and related equipment for the power generation and transmission industry. The purchase price was $92.9 million, net of cash received, resulting in preliminary additional goodwill of $54.8 million, of which all will be deductible for tax purposes. Unifin will operate as a business of Wabtec’s Freight Group. On July 22, 2009, the Company acquired certain assets for $3.4 million.

On December 5, 2008, the Company acquired Standard Car Truck Company (“SCT”), a manufacturer and designer of stabilization systems for freight cars, including engineered truck (undercarriage) components such as springs, friction wedges and wear plates. Its Barber® brand truck design is used throughout the world and holds a leading share of the North American market. The company also manufactures and services locomotives components, including compressors and pumps. The purchase price was $302.6 million, net of cash received, resulting in goodwill of $154.7 million, of which all will be deductible for tax purposes. Included in the purchase price of $302.6 million is $25.0 million related to an escrow deposit, which may be released to the Company for indemnity claims in accordance with the purchase and escrow agreements. On December 5, 2008, the Company acquired a majority of Beijing Wabtec Huaxia Technology Company, Ltd. (“Huaxia”) for $5.6 million. On December 31, 2008, the Company invested $2.8 million in Shenyang CNR Wabtec Railway Brake Technology Company, Ltd. (“Shenyang”) for a minority interest in a joint venture Company. Huaxia and Shenyang manufactures braking equipment, including brake shoes, pads and friction linings for the freight car market in China. On October 27, 2008, the Company acquired certain assets related to the development, sale, service, and maintenance of software programs used in train management systems for $4.5 million. On June 30, 2008, the Company acquired 100% of the stock of Poli S.p.A. (Poli), a European based manufacturer of rail braking equipment including brake discs for high speed applications, as well as tread brake units and pneumatic brake valves that meet International Union of Railways (UIC) standards. Poli will primarily operate as a business of Wabtec’s Transit Group. The purchase price was €55.2 million (about $87.0 million USD), net of cash received, resulting in goodwill of $38.9 million, of which none will be deductible for tax purposes. Included in the purchase price is $11.8 million related to an escrow deposit, which may be released to the Company for indemnity claims, environmental claims or allocation of tax liabilities in accordance with the purchase and escrow agreements.

On June 8, 2007, the Company acquired 100% of the stock of Ricon Corporation (Ricon), a manufacturer of a variety of electro-mechanical wheelchair lifts and ramps and anti-graffiti windows. The purchase price was $73.6 million resulting in additional goodwill of $49.7 million, of which none will be deductible for tax purposes. Included in the purchase price of $73.6 million is $6.5 million related to an escrow deposit, which may be released to the Company for working capital adjustments or indemnity claims in accordance with the purchase and escrow agreements.

Operating results have been included in the consolidated statement of operations from the acquisition date forward.

 

57


Table of Contents

For the Unifin, SCT and Poli acquisition, the following table summarizes the preliminary estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition:

 

     Unifin     SCT     Poli  

In thousands

   October 1,
2009
    December 5,
2008
    June 30,
2008
 

Current assets

   $ 8,769      $ 81,639      $ 25,595   

Property, plant & equipment

     5,552        22,448        11,999   

Goodwill and other intangible assets

     88,337        225,682        76,342   

Other assets

     4,027        659        4,236   
                        

Total assets acquired

     106,685        330,428        118,172   

Total liabilities assumed

     (13,760     (27,813     (31,138
                        

Net assets acquired

   $ 92,925      $ 302,615      $ 87,034   
                        

Of the preliminary allocation of $33.5 million of acquired intangible assets for Unifin, exclusive of goodwill, $14.8 million was assigned to trade name, $16.3 million was assigned to customer relationships, $278,000 was assigned to patents and $2.1 million was assigned to customer backlog. The trade name is considered to have an indefinite useful life while the customer relationships’ average useful life is 10 years and patents’ average useful life is three years. The allocation of $71.0 million of acquired intangible assets for SCT exclusive of goodwill, $29.3 million was assigned to trade name, $38.5 million was assigned to customer relationships, $743,000 was assigned to patents, $1.0 million was assigned to customer backlog and $1.4 million was assigned to long term contracts. The trade name is considered to have an indefinite useful life while the customer relationships’ average useful life is 24 years and patents’ average useful life is nine years. The allocation of $37.4 million of acquired intangible assets for Poli, exclusive of goodwill, $18.8 million was assigned to trade name, $17.8 million was assigned to customer relationships, $449,000 was assigned to patents and $312,000 was assigned to customer backlog. The trade name is considered to have an indefinite useful life while the customer relationships average useful life is 15 years and patents average useful life is eight years.

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents income statement results as if Poli, SCT, Huaxia and Unifin had occurred January 1, 2008:

 

     For the year ended
December 31,

In thousands, except per share

   2009    2008

Net sales

   $ 1,436,011    $ 1,875,175

Gross profit

     410,084      511,640

Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders (1)

     125,464      117,106

Diluted earnings per share

     

As reported

   $ 2.39    $ 2.66

Pro forma

   $ 2.61    $ 2.39

 

(1) For the year ended December 31, 2008, net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders included $48.5 million of expense for management incentive bonus recorded by SCT in conjunction with signing the purchase agreement.

 

58


Table of Contents
4. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES

 

     For the year ended
December 31,

In thousands

   2009    2008    2007

Interest paid during the year

   $ 17,693    $ 11,449    $ 10,601

Income taxes paid during the year, net of amount refunded

     35,766      62,798      49,841

Business acquisitions:

        

Fair value of assets acquired

   $ 111,583    $ 447,406    $ 95,600

Liabilities assumed

     13,760      41,169      22,000
                    

Cash paid

     97,823      406,237      73,600

Less cash acquired

     1,540      8,105      —  
                    

Net cash paid

   $ 96,283    $ 398,132    $ 73,600
                    

On July 31, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock. On February 20, 2008 the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $100 million of the Company’s outstanding shares. The Company intends to purchase these shares on the open market or in negotiated or block trades. No time limit was set for the completion of the program. The program qualifies under the 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement as well as the 6.875% Senior Notes currently outstanding.

During the first quarter of 2008, the Company repurchased 712,900 shares at an average price of $34.29 per share, exhausting the $50.0 million authorization made in 2006. During the second quarter of 2008, the Company repurchased 5,200 shares at an average price of $35.97 per share. No additional shares were repurchased during the third quarter of 2008. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company repurchased 599,800 shares at an average price of $35.22 per share. All purchases were on the open market.

During the first quarter of 2009, the Company repurchased 290,000 shares at an average price of $25.08 per share. During the second quarter of 2009, the Company repurchased 379,700 shares at an average price of $32.61 per share. No additional shares were repurchased during the third and fourth quarters of 2009. All purchases were on the open market.

 

5. RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT CHARGES

Wabtec downsized its Canadian operations by moving certain products to lower-cost facilities and outsourcing. In the Freight segment, Wabtec recorded charges of 4.6 million and $3.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. No charges for these operations and this restructuring plan were recorded in the year ended December 31, 2009. For these operations cumulative expenses for restructuring and other expenses recorded since 2006 have been $16.5 million, comprised of the $5.7 million for employee severance costs for approximately 400 employees; $5.5 million of pension and postretirement benefit curtailment for those employees; $5.3 million related to fixed asset and goodwill impairment. Goodwill impairment was recorded as amortization expense and most of the other charges were recorded in cost of sales. Severance costs are contractual liabilities and payment is dependent on the waiver by or expiration of certain seniority rights of those employees. As of December 31, 2009, $4.2 million of this amount had been paid.

 

59


Table of Contents
6. INVENTORIES

The components of inventory, net of reserves, were:

 

     December 31,

In thousands

   2009    2008

Raw materials

   $ 98,196    $ 95,270

Work-in-process

     87,155      89,474

Finished goods

     53,982      79,414
             

Total inventories

   $ 239,333    $ 264,158
             

 

7. PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT

The major classes of depreciable assets are as follows:

 

     December 31,  

In thousands

   2009     2008  

Machinery and equipment

   $ 328,172      $ 308,189   

Buildings and improvements

     110,949        110,804   

Land and improvements

     9,448        9,194   

Locomotive leased fleet

     3,427        3,417   
                

PP&E

     451,996        431,604   

Less: accumulated depreciation

     (250,289     (224,056
                

Total

   $ 201,707      $ 207,548   
                

The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment are as follows:

 

     Years

Land improvements

   10 to 20

Buildings and improvements

   20 to 40

Machinery and equipment

   3 to 15

Locomotive leased fleet

   4 to 15

Depreciation expense was $25.7 million, $24.7 million, and $25.1 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

8. INTANGIBLES

Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. Other intangibles (with definite lives) are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives. Goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are reviewed annually during the fourth quarter for impairment by applying a fair-value-based test and more frequently when indicators of impairment are present. The fair value was determined using a combination of discounted cash flow analysis and market multiples based upon historical and projected financial information. Goodwill and indefinite live intangible assets were not impaired at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

 

60


Table of Contents

Goodwill was $483.0 million and $319.4 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The adjustment of $103.5 million to Goodwill for is due to Standard Car Truck and Poli. The change in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the year ended December 31, 2009 is as follows:

 

In thousands

   Freight
Group
   Transit
Group
   Total

Balance at December 31, 2008

   $ 182,247    $ 137,202    $ 319,449

Adjustment to preliminary purchase allocation

     88,211      15,303      103,514

Acquisition

     55,712      —        55,712

Foreign currency impact

     2,400      1,903      4,303
                    

Balance at December 31, 2009

   $ 328,570    $ 154,408    $ 482,978
                    

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company’s trademarks had a net carrying amount of $96.0 million and $75.6 million, respectively, and the Company believes these intangibles have an indefinite life. Intangible assets of the Company, other than goodwill and trademarks, consist of the following:

 

    December 31,

In thousands

  2009    2008

Patents and other, net of accumulated amortization of $26,135 and $28,294

  $ 10,832    $ 19,409

Customer relationships, net of accumulated amortization of $7,122 and $3,399

    80,806      141,739
            

Total

  $ 91,638    $ 161,148
            

The weighted average useful lives of patents, customer relationships and intellectual property were seven years, 17 years and 19 years respectively. Amortization expense for intangible assets was $9.8 million, $5.0 million, and $3.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

Amortization expense for the five succeeding years is as follows (in thousands):

 

2010

   $ 7,194

2011

   $ 7,123

2012

   $ 7,049

2013

   $ 6,676

2014

   $ 6,668

 

9. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

 

     December 31,

In thousands

   2009    2008

6.875% senior notes, due 2013

   $ 150,000    $ 150,000

Term Loan Facility

     170,000      200,000

Revolving Credit Facility

     71,000      36,000

Capital Leases

     780      1,080
             

Total

     391,780      387,080

Less—current portion

     32,741      30,381
             

Long-term portion

   $ 359,039    $ 356,699
             

 

61


Table of Contents

2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement

On November 4, 2008, the Company refinanced its existing unsecured revolving credit agreement with a consortium of commercial banks. This “2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement” provides the company with a $300 million five-year revolving credit facility and a $200 million five-year term loan facility. The Company incurred $2.9 million of deferred financing cost related to the 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement. Both facilities expire in January 2013. The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement borrowings bear variable interest rates indexed to the indices described below. At December 31, 2009, the Company had available bank borrowing capacity, net of $28.6 million of letters of credit, of approximately $200.4 million, subject to certain financial covenant restrictions.

Under the 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement, the Company may elect a Base Rate of interest or an interest rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) of interest (“the Alternate Rate”). The Base Rate adjusts on a daily basis and is the greater of the PNC, N.A. prime rate, 30-day LIBOR plus 150 basis points or the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% per annum, plus a margin that ranges from 25 to 50 basis points. The Alternate rate is based on quoted LIBOR rates plus a margin that ranges from 125 to 200 basis points. Both the Base Rate and Alternate Rate margins are dependent on the Company’s consolidated total indebtedness to cash flow ratios. The initial Base Rate margin is 25 basis points and the Alternate Rate margin is 125 basis points. At December 31, 2009 the weighted average interest rate on the Company’s variable rate debt was 1.49%. To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on a portion of this variable-rate debt, the Company entered into an interest rate swap which effectively converted a portion of the debt from variable to fixed-rate borrowing during the term of the swap contract. On December 31, 2009, the notional value of the interest rate swap outstanding was $92.5 million and effectively changed the Company’s interest rate on bank debt at December 31, 2009 from a variable rate to a fixed rate of 1.84%. The interest rate swap agreement matures in January 2010. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty. However, since only the cash interest payments are exchanged, exposure is significantly less than the notional amount. The counterparty is a large financial institution and the Company does not anticipate nonperformance.

The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement limits the Company’s ability to declare or pay cash dividends and prohibits the Company from declaring or making other distributions, subject to certain exceptions. The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement contains various other covenants and restrictions including the following limitations: incurrence of additional indebtedness; mergers, consolidations, sales of assets and acquisitions; additional liens; sale and leasebacks; permissible investments, loans and advances; certain debt payments; and imposes a minimum interest expense coverage ratio of 3.0 and a maximum debt to cash flow ratio of 3.25. The Company is in compliance with these measurements and covenants and expects that these measurements will not be any type of limiting factor in executing our operating activities.

6.875% Senior Notes Due August 2013

In August 2003, the Company issued $150 million of Senior Notes due in 2013 (“the Notes”). The Notes were issued at par. Interest on the Notes accrues at a rate of 6.875% per annum and is payable semi-annually on January 31 and July 31 of each year. The proceeds were used to repay debt outstanding under the Company’s existing credit agreement, and for general corporate purposes. The principal balance is due in full at maturity.

The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and rank pari passu with all existing and future senior debt and senior to all our existing and future subordinated indebtedness of the Company. The indenture under which the Notes were issued contains covenants and restrictions which limit among other things, the following: the incurrence of indebtedness, payment of dividends and certain distributions, sale of assets, change in control, mergers and consolidations and the incurrence of liens.

 

62


Table of Contents

Debt and Capital Leases

Capital leases were acquired in the Poli and SCT acquisitions.

Scheduled principal repayments of debt and capital lease balances as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:

 

2010

   $ 32,741

2011

     40,233

2012

     40,108

2013

     278,530

2014

     30

Future years

     138
      

Total

   $ 391,780
      

 

10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Defined Benefit Pension Plans

The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans that cover certain U.S., Canadian, German, and United Kingdom employees and which provide benefits of stated amounts for each year of service of the employee.

The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for the U.S., Canadian, German and U.K. plans. The following tables provide information regarding the Company’s defined benefit pension plans summarized by U.S. and international components.

 

63


Table of Contents

Obligations and Funded Status

 

     U.S.     International  

In thousands

   2009     2008     2009     2008  

Change in projected benefit obligation

        

Obligation at beginning of year

   $ (46,408   $ (45,555   $ (100,183   $ (142,188

Service cost

     (282     (278     (2,775     (3,299

Interest cost

     (2,745     (2,763     (6,864     (7,438

Employee contributions

     —          —          (438     (609

Plan curtailments

     —          —          (1,015     (2,473

Plan amendments

     (28     —          —          —     

Benefits paid

     4,028        3,763        11,981        11,085   

Expenses paid

     —          —          660        713   

Premiums paid

     —          —          186        243   

Acquisitions

     —          (1,100     (6,870     —     

Adjustments due to the adoption of measurement date provisions

     —          —          —          (559

Actuarial (loss) gain

     (1,592     (475     (10,138     16,655   

Effect of currency rate changes

     —          —          (13,541     27,687   
                                

Obligation at end of year

   $ (47,027   $ (46,408   $ (128,997   $ (100,183
                                

Change in plan assets

        

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

   $ 32,164      $ 43,444      $ 78,843      $ 126,276   

Actual return on plan assets

     5,152        (9,213     14,984        (21,435

Employer contributions

     1,584        1,000        11,897        9,649   

Employee contributions

     —          —          438        609   

Benefits paid

     (4,028     (3,763     (11,981     (11,085

Expenses paid

     —          —          (660     (713

Premiums paid

     —          —          (186     (243

Acquisitions

     —          696        6,813        —     

Adjustments due to the adoption of measurement date provisions

     —          —          —          (113

Effect of currency rate changes

     —          —          12,454        (24,102
                                

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

   $ 34,872      $ 32,164      $ 112,602      $ 78,843   
                                

Funded status

        

Fair value of plan assets

   $ 34,872      $ 32,164      $ 112,602      $ 78,843   

Benefit obligations

     (47,027     (46,408     (128,997     (100,183
                                

Funded Status

   $ (12,155   $ (14,244   $ (16,395   $ (21,340
                                

Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position consist of:

        

Noncurrent assets

   $ —        $ —        $ 4,124      $ 2,405   

Current liabilities

     —          —          (376     (314

Noncurrent liabilities

     (12,155     (14,244     (20,143     (23,431
                                

Net amount recognized

   $ (12,155   $ (14,244   $ (16,395   $ (21,340
                                

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consist of:

        

Initial net obligation

   $ —        $ —        $ (1,291   $ (1,731

Prior service costs

     (284     (317     (1,359     (1,511

Net actuarial loss

     (29,242     (30,925     (25,145     (23,932
                                

Net amount recognized

   $ (29,526   $ (31,242   $ (27,795   $ (27,174
                                

 

64


Table of Contents

The aggregate accumulated benefit obligation for the U.S. pension plans was $46.5 million and $45.9 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The aggregate accumulated benefit obligation for the international pension plans was $119.0 million and $90.9 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

     U.S.     International  

In thousands

   2009     2008     2009     2008  

Information for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:

        

Projected benefit obligation

   $ (47,027   $ (46,408   $ (84,624   $ (82,306

Accumulated benefit obligation

     (46,472     (45,899     (77,767     (74,764

Fair value of plan assets

     34,872        32,164        64,105        58,606   

Information for pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:

        

Projected benefit obligation

   $ (47,027   $ (46,408   $ (84,624   $ (88,740

Fair value of plan assets

     34,872        32,164        64,105        64,995   

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs

 

<
     U.S.     International  

In thousands

   2009     2008     2007     2009     2008     2007  

Service cost

   $ 282      $ 278      $ 320      $ 2,775      $ 3,299      $ 3,638   

Interest cost

     2,745        2,763        2,710        6,864        7,438        6,992   

Expected return on plan assets

     (3,269     (3,325     (3,237     (6,311     (8,344     (7,685

Amortization of initial net obligation

     —          —          —          180        250        268   

Amortization of prior service cost

     62        59        59        287        351        463   

Amortization of net loss

     1,392        1,229        1,507        1,418        868        892   

Curtailment loss recognized

     —          —          —          1,528        2,869        2,546   

Settlement loss recognized

     —          —          —          2,311        1,943        306   

Special termination benefit recognized

     —          —          —          —          —          79