UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission
|
|
Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter and
|
|
State of
|
|
I.R.S.
|
File Number
|
|
principal office address and telephone number
|
|
Incorporation
|
|
Employer Identification No.
|
|
|
1-16163
|
|
WGL Holdings, Inc.
101 Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20080
(703) 750-2000
|
|
Virginia
|
|
52-2210912
|
|
0-49807
|
|
Washington Gas Light Company
101 Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20080
(703) 750-4440
|
|
District of
Columbia
and Virginia
|
|
53-0162882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act (as of September 30, 2009):
|
|
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
|
|
|
WGL Holdings, Inc. common
stock, no par value
|
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act (as of September 30, 2009):
|
|
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
|
|
|
Washington Gas Light Company
preferred stock,
cumulative, without par value:
|
|
|
|
$4.25 Series
|
|
|
Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board
|
$4.80 Series
|
|
|
Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board
|
$5.00 Series
|
|
|
Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark if each
registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
|
|
|
WGL Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Yes [X] No [ ]
|
Washington Gas Light Company
|
|
Yes [ ] No [X]
|
Indicate by check mark if each
registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether each
registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrants were required to file such reports)
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past
90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required
to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes [ ] No [ ].
Indicate by check mark if
disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the
definitions of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
WGL Holdings, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
Large
Accelerated Filer [X]
|
Accelerated Filer [ ]
|
Non-Accelerated Filer [ ]
|
Smaller Reporting Company [ ]
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
Washington Gas Light Company:
|
|
|
|
Large
Accelerated Filer [ ]
|
Accelerated Filer [ ]
|
Non-Accelerated Filer [X]
|
Smaller Reporting Company [ ]
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether each
registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act): Yes [ ] No [X]
The aggregate market value of the
voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant,
WGL Holdings, Inc., amounted to $1,633,538,203 as of
March 31, 2009.
WGL Holdings, Inc. common stock, no
par value outstanding as of October 31, 2009:
50,264,447 shares.
All of the outstanding shares of
common stock ($1 par value) of Washington Gas Light Company
were held by WGL Holdings, Inc. as of October 31, 2009.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of WGL Holdings,
Inc.s definitive Proxy Statement and Washington Gas
Light Companys definitive Information Statement in
connection with the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
Regulation 14A and 14C not later than 120 days after
September 30, 2009, are incorporated in Part III of
this report.
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009
Table of Contents
i
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
INTRODUCTION
FILING
FORMAT
This annual report on
Form 10-K
is a combined report being filed by two separate registrants:
WGL Holdings, Inc. (WGL Holdings) and Washington Gas Light
Company (Washington Gas). Except where the content clearly
indicates otherwise, any reference in the report to WGL
Holdings, we, us or
our is to the holding company or the consolidated
entity of WGL Holdings and all of its subsidiaries, including
Washington Gas which is a distinct registrant that is a wholly
owned subsidiary of WGL Holdings.
The Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (Managements
Discussion) included under Item 7 is divided into two major
sections for WGL Holdings and Washington Gas. Included under
Item 8 are the Consolidated Financial Statements of WGL
Holdings and the Financial Statements of Washington Gas. Also
included are the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements that
are presented on a combined basis for both WGL Holdings and
Washington Gas.
SAFE HARBOR FOR
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain matters discussed in this report, excluding historical
information, include forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 with respect to the outlook for earnings, revenues and
other future financial business performance or strategies and
expectations. Forward-looking statements are typically
identified by words such as, but not limited to,
estimates, expects,
anticipates, intends,
believes, plans, and similar
expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as
will, should, would and
could. Although the registrants, WGL Holdings and
Washington Gas, believe such forward-looking statements are
based on reasonable assumptions, they cannot give assurance that
every objective will be achieved. Forward-looking statements
speak only as of today, and the registrants assume no duty to
update them. The following factors, among others, could cause
actual results to differ materially from forward-looking
statements or historical performance:
|
|
|
|
|
the level and rate at which costs and expenses are incurred and
the extent to which they are allowed to be recovered from
customers through the regulatory process in connection with
constructing, operating and maintaining Washington Gass
natural gas distribution system;
|
|
|
|
the ability to implement successful approaches to modify the
current or future composition of gas delivered to customers or
to remediate the effects of the current or future composition of
gas delivered to customers, as a result of the introduction of
gas from the Dominion Cove Point or Elba Island facility to
Washington Gass natural gas distribution system;
|
|
|
|
the availability of natural gas supply and interstate pipeline
transportation and storage capacity;
|
|
|
|
the ability of natural gas producers, pipeline gatherers and
natural gas processors to deliver natural gas into interstate
pipelines for delivery by those interstate pipelines to the
entrance points of Washington Gass natural gas
distribution system as a result of factors beyond our control;
|
|
|
|
changes and developments in economic, competitive, political and
regulatory conditions;
|
|
|
|
changes in capital and energy commodity market conditions;
|
|
|
|
changes in credit ratings of debt securities of WGL Holdings or
Washington Gas that may affect access to capital or the cost of
debt;
|
|
|
|
changes in credit market conditions and creditworthiness of
customers and suppliers;
|
|
|
|
changes in relevant laws and regulations, including tax,
environmental and employment laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
legislative, regulatory and judicial mandates or decisions
affecting business operations or the timing of recovery of costs
and expenses;
|
|
|
|
the timing and success of business and product development
efforts and technological improvements;
|
|
|
|
the pace of deregulation efforts and the availability of other
competitive alternatives to our products and services;
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting principles;
|
|
|
|
new commodity purchase and sales contracts or financial
contracts and modifications in the terms of existing contracts
that may materially affect fair value calculations under
derivative accounting requirements;
|
1
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
|
|
|
|
|
the ability to manage the outsourcing of several business
processes;
|
|
|
|
acts of nature;
|
|
|
|
terrorist activities and
|
|
|
|
other uncertainties.
|
The outcome of negotiations and discussions that the registrants
may hold with other parties from time to time regarding utility
and energy-related investments and strategic transactions that
are both recurring and non-recurring may also affect future
performance. All such factors are difficult to predict
accurately and are generally beyond the direct control of the
registrants. Accordingly, while they believe that the
assumptions are reasonable, the registrants cannot ensure that
all expectations and objectives will be realized. Readers are
urged to use care and consider the risks, uncertainties and
other factors that could affect the registrants business
as described in this annual report on
Form 10-K.
All forward-looking statements made in this report rely upon the
safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
2
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
GLOSSARY OF KEY
TERMS
Active Customer Meters: Natural gas meters
that are physically connected to a building structure within the
Washington Gas distribution system and that receive active
service.
Asset Optimization Program: A program to
optimize the value of Washington Gass long-term natural
gas transportation and storage capacity resources during periods
when these resources are not being used to physically serve
utility customers.
Book Value Per Share: Common
shareholders equity divided by the number of common shares
outstanding.
Bundled Service: Service in which customers
purchase both the natural gas commodity and the distribution or
delivery of the commodity from the local regulated utility. When
customers purchase bundled service from Washington Gas, no
mark-up is
applied to the cost of the natural gas commodity that is passed
through to customers.
Business Process Outsourcing (BPO)
Agreement: An agreement whereby a service provider
performs certain functions that have historically been performed
by Washington Gas.
City Gate: A point or measuring station at
which a gas distribution company such as Washington Gas receives
natural gas from an unaffiliated pipeline or transmission system.
Cooling Degree Day (CDD): A measure of the
variation in weather based on the extent to which the daily
average temperature is above 65 degrees Fahrenheit.
Delivery Service: The regulated distribution
or delivery of natural gas to retail customers. Washington Gas
provides delivery service to retail customers in
Washington, D.C. and parts of Maryland and Virginia.
Design Day: Washington Gass design day
represents the maximum anticipated demand on Washington
Gass natural gas distribution system during a
24-hour
period assuming a five-degree Fahrenheit average temperature and
17 miles per hour average wind, considered to be the
coldest conditions expected to be experienced in the
Washington, D.C. region.
Design-Build Energy Systems: Formerly known
as the heating, ventilating and air conditioning
(HVAC) segment, the design-build energy systems segment
includes the operations of Washington Gas Energy Systems, Inc.
which provides design-build energy efficient and sustainable
solutions to governmental and commercial clients.
Dividend Yield on Book Value: Dividends
declared per share divided by book value per share.
Earnings Sharing Mechanism (ESM): A rate
mechanism that enables Washington Gas to share with shareholders
and customers the earnings that exceed a target rate of return
on equity.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC): An independent agency of the
Federal government that regulates the interstate transmission of
electricity, natural gas, and oil. The FERC also reviews
proposals to build liquefied natural gas terminals and
interstate natural gas pipelines.
Financial Contract: A contract in which no
commodity is transferred between parties and only cash payments
are exchanged in amounts equal to the financial benefit of
holding the contract.
Firm Customers: Customers whose gas supply
will not be disrupted to meet the needs of other customers.
Typically, this class of customer comprises residential
customers and most commercial customers.
Gas Administrative Charge (GAC): A regulatory
mechanism designed to remove the cost of uncollectible accounts
expense related to gas costs from base rates and instead,
permits Washington Gas to collect an amount for this expense
through its Purchased Gas Charge provision.
Gross Margin: Operating revenues, less the
associated cost of natural gas or electricity and revenue taxes.
Used to measure the success of the retail energy-marketing
segments core strategy for the sale of natural gas and
electricity.
Heating Degree Day (HDD): A measure of the
variation in weather based on the extent to which the daily
average temperature falls below 65 degrees Fahrenheit.
Heavy Hydrocarbons (HHCs): Compounds, such as
hexane, which Washington Gas is injecting into its distribution
system to treat vaporized liquefied natural gas.
Interruptible Customers: Large commercial
customers whose service can be temporarily interrupted in order
for the regulated utility to meet the needs of firm customers.
These customers pay a lower delivery rate than firm customers
and they must be able to readily substitute an alternate fuel
for natural gas.
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG): The liquid form
of natural gas.
Lower of Cost or Market: The process of
adjusting the value of inventory to reflect the lesser of its
original cost or its current market value.
Mark-to-Market: The
process of adjusting the carrying value of a position held in a
physical or financial derivative to reflect its current fair
value.
Market-to-Book
Ratio: Market price of a share of common stock
divided by its book value per share.
New Customer Meters Added: Natural gas meters
that are newly connected to a building structure within the
Washington Gas distribution system. Service may or may not have
been activated.
Normal Weather: A forecast of expected HDDs
or CDDs based on historical HDD or CDD data.
3
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Payout Ratio: Dividends declared per share
divided by basic earnings per share.
Performance-Based Rate (PBR) plan: A rate
design that includes performance measures for customer service
as well as an ESM.
Physical Contract: A contract in which the
actual physical commodity is transferred between parties to the
contract.
PSC of DC: The District of Columbia Public
Service Commission is a three-member board that regulates
Washington Gass distribution operations in the District of
Columbia.
PSC of MD: The Maryland Public Service
Commission is a five-member board that regulates Washington
Gass distribution operations in Maryland.
Purchased Gas Charge (PGC): The purchased gas
charge represents the cost of gas, gas transportation, gas
storage services purchased and other gas related costs. The
purchased gas charge is collected from customers through tariffs
established by the regulatory commissions that have jurisdiction
over Washington Gas.
Regulated Utility Segment: Includes the
operations of Washington Gas which are regulated by regulatory
commissions located in the District of Columbia, Maryland and
Virginia, and the operations of Hampshire Gas Company which are
regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Retail Energy-Marketing Segment: Unregulated
sales of natural gas and electricity to end users by our
subsidiary, Washington Gas Energy Services, Inc.
Return on Average Common Equity: Net income
divided by average common shareholders equity.
Revenue Normalization Adjustment (RNA): A
regulatory billing mechanism designed to stabilize the level of
net revenues collected from customers by eliminating the effect
of deviations in customer usage caused by variations in weather
from normal levels, and other factors such as conservation.
SCC of VA: The Commonwealth of Virginia State
Corporation Commission is a three-member board that regulates
Washington Gass distribution operations in Virginia.
Service Area: The region in which Washington
Gas operates. The service area includes the District of
Columbia, and the surrounding metropolitan areas in Maryland and
Virginia.
Tariffs: Documents issued by the regulatory
commission in each jurisdiction that set the prices Washington
Gas may charge and the practices it must follow when providing
utility service to its customers.
Third Party Marketer: Unregulated companies
that sell natural gas and electricity directly to retail
customers. Washington Gas Energy Services, Inc., a subsidiary
company of Washington Gas Resources Corporation, is a third
party marketer.
Therm: A natural gas unit of measurement that
includes a standard measure for heating value. We report our
natural gas sales and deliveries in therms. A therm of gas
contains 100,000 British thermal units of heat, or the energy
equivalent of burning approximately 100 cubic feet of natural
gas under normal conditions. Ten million therms equal
approximately one billion cubic feet of natural gas.
Unbundling: The separation of the delivery of
natural gas or electricity from the sale of these commodities
and related services that, in the past, were provided only by a
regulated utility.
Utility Net Revenues: Operating revenues less
the associated cost of energy and applicable revenue taxes. Used
to analyze the profitability of the regulated utility segment,
as the cost of gas associated with sales to customers and
revenue taxes are generally pass through amounts.
Value-At-Risk: A
risk measurement that estimates the largest expected loss over a
specified period of time under normal market conditions within a
specified probabilistic confidence interval.
Washington Gas: Washington Gas Light Company
is a subsidiary of WGL Holdings, Inc. that sells and delivers
natural gas primarily to retail customers in accordance with
tariffs set by the PSC of DC, the PSC of MD and the SCC
of VA.
Washington Gas Resources: Washington Gas
Resources Corporation is a subsidiary of WGL Holdings, Inc. that
owns the majority of the non-utility subsidiaries.
WGEServices: Washington Gas Energy Services,
Inc. is a subsidiary of Washington Gas Resources Corporation
that sells natural gas and electricity to retail customers on an
unregulated basis.
WGESystems: Washington Gas Energy Systems,
Inc., is a subsidiary of Washington Gas Resources Corporation,
that provides design-build energy efficient and sustainable
solutions to government and commercial clients.
WGL Holdings: WGL Holdings, Inc. is a holding
company that became the parent company of Washington Gas Light
Company and its subsidiaries effective November 1, 2000.
Weather Derivative: A financial instrument
that provides protection from variations from normal weather.
Weather Insurance Policy: An insurance policy
that provides protection from the negative financial effects of
weather.
Weather Normalization Adjustment (WNA): A
billing adjustment mechanism that is designed to minimize the
effect of variations from normal weather on utility net revenues.
4
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business
CORPORATE
OVERVIEW
WGL HOLDINGS,
INC.
WGL Holdings is a holding company that was established on
November 1, 2000 as a Virginia corporation to own
subsidiaries that sell and deliver natural gas and provide a
variety of energy-related products and services to customers
primarily in the District of Columbia and the surrounding
metropolitan areas in Maryland and Virginia. WGL Holdings owns
all of the shares of common stock of Washington Gas, a regulated
natural gas utility, and all of the shares of common stock of
Washington Gas Resources Corporation (Washington Gas Resources),
Hampshire Gas Company (Hampshire) and Crab Run Gas Company (Crab
Run). Washington Gas Resources owns three unregulated
subsidiaries that include Washington Gas Energy Services, Inc.
(WGEServices), Washington Gas Energy Systems, Inc. (WGESystems)
and Washington Gas Credit Corporation (Credit Corp.).
WASHINGTON GAS
LIGHT COMPANY
Washington Gas is a regulated public utility that sells and
delivers natural gas to customers in the District of Columbia
and adjoining areas in Maryland, Virginia and several cities and
towns in the northern Shenandoah Valley of Virginia. Washington
Gas has been engaged in the natural gas distribution business
for 161 years, since its incorporation by an Act of
Congress in 1848. Washington Gas has been a Virginia corporation
since 1953 and a corporation of the District of Columbia since
1957.
INDUSTRY
SEGMENTS
We have three operating segments:
The regulated utility segment. The
regulated utility segment consists of Washington Gas and
Hampshire. Washington Gas, a wholly owned subsidiary of WGL
Holdings, is regulated by the Public Service Commission of the
District of Columbia (PSC of DC), the Public Service Commission
of Maryland (PSC of MD) and the State Corporation
Commission of Virginia (SCC of VA). Hampshire, a wholly owned
subsidiary of WGL Holdings, is regulated by the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC). Hampshire operates and owns full
and partial interests in underground natural gas storage
facilities including pipeline delivery facilities located in and
around Hampshire County, West Virginia. Washington Gas purchases
all of the storage services of Hampshire and includes the cost
of these services in the bills sent to its customers. Hampshire
operates under a pass-through cost of service-based
tariff approved by the FERC, and adjusts its billing rates to
Washington Gas on a periodic basis to account for changes in its
investment in utility plant and expenses.
The retail energy-marketing
segment. The retail energy-marketing segment
consists of the operations of WGEServices which competes with
regulated utilities and other unregulated third party marketers
by selling the natural gas and electric commodity directly to
residential, commercial and industrial customers with the
objective of earning a profit through competitively priced
contracts.
The design-build energy systems
segment. The design-build energy systems
segment, which consists of the operations of WGESystems,
provides design-build energy efficient and sustainable solutions
to governmental and commercial clients.
Transactions not specifically identifiable in one of these three
segments are accumulated and reported in the category
Other Activities. These transactions primarily
consist of administrative costs associated with WGL Holdings and
Washington Gas Resources. Additionally, these activities include
the operations of Crab Run, a small exploration and production
company, and Credit Corp., which previously offered financing to
customers to purchase gas appliances and other energy-related
equipment, but no longer offers this financing.
Operating revenues, net income, and total assets for each of our
segments are presented in Note 15 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
REGULATED
UTILITY SEGMENT
Description
The regulated utility segment consists of approximately 91% of
our consolidated total assets. Washington Gas, the core of the
regulated utility segment, delivers natural gas to retail
customers in accordance with tariffs approved by the regulatory
commissions that have jurisdiction over Washington Gass
rates and terms of service. These regulatory commissions set the
rates in their respective jurisdictions that Washington Gas can
charge customers for its rate-regulated services. Washington Gas
also sells natural gas to customers who have not elected to
purchase natural gas from unregulated third party marketers
(refer to the section entitled Natural Gas
Unbundling). Washington Gas recovers the cost of the
natural gas to serve firm customers through gas cost recovery
mechanisms as approved in jurisdictional tariffs. Any difference
between the firm customer gas costs incurred and the gas costs
recovered from those firm customers is deferred on the balance
sheet as an amount to be collected from or refunded to customers
in future periods. Therefore, increases or decreases in the cost
of gas associated with sales made to firm customers have no
direct effect on Washington Gass net revenues and net
income.
Washington Gas conducts an asset optimization program which
utilizes Washington Gass storage and transportation
capacity resources when not being used to physically serve
utility customers by entering into commodity-related physical
and financial contracts with third parties with the objective of
deriving a profit to be shared with its utility customers (refer
to the section entitled Asset Optimization
for a further discussion of our asset optimization program).
Unless otherwise noted, therm deliveries shown related to
Washington Gas or the regulated utility segment do not include
therms delivered related to our asset optimization program.
At September 30, 2009, Washington Gas had
1.064 million active customer meters in an area having a
population estimated at 5.3 million and over two million
households and commercial structures. Active customer meters
reflect all natural gas meters connected to the Washington Gas
distribution system, excluding those meters that are not
currently receiving service. Washington Gas is not dependent on
a single customer or group of customers such that the loss of
any one or more of such customers would have a significant
adverse effect on its business. The following table lists the
number of active customer meters and therms delivered by
jurisdiction as of and for the year ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Customer Meters and Therms Delivered by
Jurisdiction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Millions of Therms
|
|
|
|
|
|
Millions of Therms
|
|
|
|
Active Customer
|
|
|
Delivered
|
|
|
Active Customer
|
|
|
Delivered
|
|
|
|
Meters as of
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
Meters as of
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Jurisdiction
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
September 30,
2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia
|
|
|
151,922
|
|
|
|
321.4
|
|
|
|
151,514
|
|
|
|
306.4
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
431,840
|
|
|
|
791.8
|
|
|
|
427,554
|
|
|
|
732.1
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
480,309
|
|
|
|
621.8
|
|
|
|
473,964
|
|
|
|
577.7
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,064,071
|
|
|
|
1,735.0
|
|
|
|
1,053,032
|
|
|
|
1,616.2
|
|
|
For additional information on our gas deliveries and meter
statistics, refer to the section entitled Results of
Operations in Managements Discussion for
Washington Gas.
Factors critical to the success of the regulated utility segment
include: (i) operating a safe and reliable natural
gas distribution system; (ii) having sufficient
natural gas supplies to serve the demand of its customers;
(iii) being competitive with other sources of energy
such as electricity, fuel oil and propane;
(iv) access to sources of liquidity;
(v) recovering the costs and expenses of this
business in the rates it charges to customers and
(vi) earning a just and reasonable rate of return on
invested capital. During fiscal years ended September 30,
2009, 2008, and 2007, the regulated utility segment reported
total operating revenues related to gas sales and deliveries to
external customers of approximately $1.5 billion,
$1.6 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively.
Rates and
Regulatory Matters
Washington Gas is regulated by the following state and local
government agencies which approve the terms of service and the
billing rates that it charges to its customers. The rates
charged to utility customers are designed to recover Washington
Gass operating expenses and natural gas commodity costs
and to provide a return on its investment in the net assets used
in its firm gas sales and
6
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
delivery service. Refer to the section entitled Rates
and Regulatory Matters in Managements Discussion
for Washington Gas for a discussion of current rates and
regulatory matters.
District of
Columbia Jurisdiction
The PSC of DC consists of three full-time members who are
appointed by the Mayor with the advice and consent of the
District of Columbia City Council. The term of each commissioner
is four years. There are no limitations on the number of terms
that can be served. The PSC of DC has no time limitation in
which it must make decisions regarding modifications to base
rates charged by Washington Gas to its customers.
Maryland
Jurisdiction
The PSC of MD currently consists of five full-time members who
are appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the
Senate of Maryland. Each commissioner is appointed to a
five-year term, with no limit on the number of terms that can be
served.
Washington Gas is required to give 30 days notice
before filing for a rate increase. The PSC of MD may initially
suspend the proposed increase for 150 days following the
30-day
notice period, and then has the option to extend the suspension
for an additional 30 days. If action has not been taken
after 210 days, the requested rates become effective
subject to refund.
Virginia
Jurisdiction
The SCC of VA consists of three full-time members who are
elected by the General Assembly of Virginia. Each commissioner
has a six-year term with no limitation on the number of terms
that can be served.
Either of two methods may be used to request a modification of
existing rates. First, Washington Gas may file an application
for a general rate increase in which it may propose new
adjustments to the cost of service that are different from those
previously approved for Washington Gas by the SCC of VA, as well
as a revised return on equity. The proposed rates under this
process may take effect 150 days after the filing, subject
to refund pending the outcome of the SCC of VAs action on
the application.
Second, an expedited rate case procedure is available which
provides that proposed rate increases may be effective
30 days after the filing date, also subject to refund.
Under the expedited rate case procedure, Washington Gas may not
propose any new adjustments for issues not previously approved
in its last general rate case, or a change in its return on
common equity from the level authorized in its last general rate
case. Once filed, other parties may propose new adjustments or a
change in the cost of capital from the level authorized in its
last general rate case. The expedited rate case procedure may
not be available if the SCC of VA decides that there has been a
substantial change in circumstances since the last general rate
case filed by Washington Gas.
Seasonality of
Business Operations
Washington Gass business is weather-sensitive and seasonal
because the majority of its business is derived from residential
and small commercial customers who use natural gas for space
heating purposes. Excluding deliveries for electric generation,
in fiscal year 2009 and 2008, approximately 77% and 75%,
respectively, of the total therms delivered in Washington
Gass service area occurred during its first and second
fiscal quarters. Washington Gass earnings are typically
generated during these two quarters, and Washington Gas
historically incurs net losses in the third and fourth fiscal
quarters. The seasonal nature of Washington Gass business
creates large variations in short-term cash requirements,
primarily due to the fluctuations in the level of customer
accounts receivable, unbilled revenues and storage gas
inventories. Washington Gas finances these seasonal requirements
primarily through the sale of commercial paper and unsecured
short-term bank loans. For information on our management of
weather risk, refer to the section entitled Weather
Risk in Managements Discussion. For information
on our management of our cash requirements, refer to the section
entitled Liquidity and Capital Resources in
Managements Discussion.
Natural Gas
Supply and Capacity
Capacity and
Supply Requirements
Washington Gas is responsible for acquiring sufficient natural
gas supplies, interstate pipeline capacity and storage capacity
to meet customer demand. As such, Washington Gas has adopted a
diversified portfolio approach designed to satisfy the demand of
its customers and to address the constraints on supply, using
multiple supply receipt points, dependable interstate pipeline
transportation and storage arrangements, and its own substantial
storage and peaking capabilities to meet its customers
demands. Washington Gass supply and pipeline capacity plan
is based on forecasted system requirements, and takes into
7
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
account estimated load growth by type of customer, attrition,
conservation, geographic location, interstate pipeline and
storage capacity and contractual limitations and the forecasted
movement of customers between bundled service and delivery
service. Under reduced supply conditions, Washington Gas may
implement contingency plans in order to maximize the number of
customers served. Contingency plans include requests to conserve
to the general population and targeted curtailments to specific
sections of the system, consistent with curtailment tariffs
approved by regulators in each of Washington Gass three
jurisdictions.
Washington Gas obtains natural gas supplies that originate from
the Gulf Coast Region, the Appalachian and Canadian regions, as
well as natural gas in the form of vaporized liquefied natural
gas (LNG) through the Cove Point LNG terminal owned by Dominion
Cove Point LNG, LP and Dominion Transmission, Inc. (collectively
Dominion) as discussed below. At September 30, 2009 and
2008, Washington Gas had service agreements with four pipeline
companies that provided firm transportation
and/or
storage services directly to Washington Gass city gate.
For fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively, these contracts
have expiration dates ranging from fiscal years 2010 to 2029 and
2009 to 2028.
Cove Point
Natural Gas Supply
In late fiscal year 2003, Dominion reactivated its Cove Point
LNG terminal. The composition of the vaporized LNG received from
the Cove Point LNG terminal resulted in increased leaks in
mechanical couplings on the portion of our distribution system
in Prince Georges County, Maryland that directly receives
the Cove Point gas. Through a pipeline replacement project and
the construction of a heavy hydrocarbon (HHC) injection facility
at the gate station that exclusively receives gas from the Cove
Point terminal, Washington Gas has reduced the occurrence of new
coupling leaks in this area of the distribution system. A recent
expansion of the physical capacity of the Cove Point terminal
could result in a substantial increase in the receipt of Cove
Point gas into additional portions of Washington Gass
distribution system as greater volumes of Cove Point gas are
introduced into other downstream pipelines that provide service
to Washington Gas. Based upon engineering and flow studies and
our experience, this increase in the receipt of Cove Point gas
is likely to result in a significantly greater number of leaks
in other parts of Washington Gass distribution system,
unless our efforts to mitigate these additional leaks are
successful. Washington Gas is attempting to mitigate this
anticipated increase in leaks through: (i) pipeline
replacement programs; (ii) the operation of three
HHC injection facilities; (iii) isolating its
interstate pipeline receipt points and limiting the amount of
gas received, where possible, from pipelines that transport Cove
Point gas; (iv) blending, where possible, the Cove
Point gas with other supplies of natural gas from within the
continental United States and (v) continued efforts
before the FERC to condition incremental increases in deliveries
from the Cove Point terminal on the appropriate resolution of
safety concerns consistent with the public interest. Refer to
the section entitled Operating Issues Related To Cove
Point Natural Gas Supply in Managements
Discussion for further information on this issue.
Projects for
Expanding Capacity
As the result of growing demand, Washington Gas anticipates
enhancing its peaking capacity by constructing an LNG peaking
facility that is currently expected to be completed and placed
in service by the
2013-2014
winter heating season, subject to favorable outcomes on certain
zoning and legal challenges. This peaking facility will provide
two million therms of deliverability and 10 million therms
of annual storage capacity. For information related to capital
expenditures for this peaking facility, refer to the section
entitled Liquidity and Capital ResourcesCapital
Expenditures in Managements Discussion.
Additionally, Washington Gas has contracted with various
interstate pipeline and storage companies to expand its
transportation and storage capacity. Recent projects completed
or in progress, to expand Washington Gass transportation
and/or
storage capacity, are outlined below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projects For Expanding Transportation and Storage
Capacity (In therms)
|
|
|
Daily Storage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
Annual Storage
|
|
|
In-Service Date
|
Pipeline Service Provider
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
(Fiscal Year)
|
|
|
Hardy Storage Company
LLC(a)
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
56 million
|
|
|
Three-year phase-in that began in 2007
|
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Ohio Storage
Expansion)(a,b)
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
40 million
|
|
|
2010
|
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Eastern Market Expansion
Storage)(a)
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
30 million
|
|
|
2010
|
Dominion Transmission Inc. Storage Factory
|
|
|
1 million
|
|
|
|
60 million
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Supplier delivers the stored
natural gas directly to Washington Gass distribution
system using the capabilities of the Columbia Gas
Transmission system. |
(b) |
|
Washington Gas converted 600,000
therms of firm transportation capacity into firm storage
capacity in FY 2009. |
8
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
Washington Gas will continue to monitor other opportunities to
acquire or participate in obtaining additional pipeline and
storage capacity that will support customer growth and improve
or maintain the high level of service expected by its customer
base.
Asset
Optimization
Washington Gas optimizes the value of its long-term natural gas
transportation and storage capacity resources during periods
when these resources are not being used to physically serve
utility customers. Washington Gas utilizes its transportation
capacity assets to benefit from favorable natural gas price
differentials between different geographic locations and its
storage capacity assets to benefit from favorable natural gas
price differentials between different time periods. Washington
Gas enters into physical and financial derivative transactions
in the form of forwards, swaps and option contracts to lock-in
operating margins that Washington Gas will ultimately realize.
Regulatory sharing mechanisms in all three jurisdictions allow
the profit from these transactions to be shared between
Washington Gass shareholders and customers; therefore, any
changes in fair value are recorded through earnings, or as
regulatory assets or liabilities, to the extent that gains and
losses associated with these derivative instruments will be
included in the rates charged to customers.
The derivatives used under this program are subject to
mark-to-market
accounting treatment. This treatment may cause significant
period-to-period
volatility in earnings from unrealized gains and losses
associated with these valuation changes for the portion of net
profits to be retained for shareholders; however, this
volatility does not change the locked-in operating margins that
Washington Gas will ultimately realize from these transactions.
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC
Topic 815, Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for
Trading Purposes and Involved in Energy Trading and Risk
Management Activities, (ASC Topic 815), all physically and
financially settled contracts under our asset optimization
program are reported on a net basis in the statements of income
in Utility cost of gas. Total net margins recorded
to Utility cost of gas after sharing and management
fees associated with all asset optimization transactions for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 were
$12.2 million.
During fiscal year 2009 and 2008, respectively,
774.9 million and 520.6 million therms of natural gas
were purchased under our asset optimization program and
772.7 million and 520.1 million therms of natural gas
were delivered for contracts that were physically settled
related to our internally managed asset optimization program.
Refer to the sections entitled Results of
Operations Regulated Utility and Market
Risk in Managements Discussion for a further
discussion of this program and its effect on earnings.
Annual
Sendout
As reflected in the table below, there were six sources of
delivery through which Washington Gas received natural gas to
satisfy its customer demand requirements in fiscal year 2009.
These same six sources also are expected to be utilized to
satisfy customer demand requirements in fiscal year 2010. Firm
transportation denotes gas transported directly to the entry
point of Washington Gass distribution system in
contractually viable volumes. Transportation storage denotes
volumes stored by a pipeline during the spring, summer and fall
for withdrawal and delivery to the Washington Gas distribution
system during the winter heating season to meet load
requirements. Peak load requirements are met by:
(i) underground natural gas storage at the Hampshire
storage field in Hampshire County, West Virginia;
(ii) the local production of propane air plants
located at Washington Gas-owned facilities in Rockville,
Maryland (Rockville Station) and in Springfield, Virginia
(Ravensworth Station) and (iii) other peak-shaving
resources. Unregulated third party marketers acquire interstate
pipeline and storage capacity and the natural gas commodity on
behalf of Washington Gass delivery service customers under
customer choice programs, some of which may be provided through
transportation, storage and peaking resources that may be
provided by Washington Gas to the unregulated third party
marketers under tariffs approved by the three public service
commissions (refer to the section entitled Natural Gas
Unbundling). These retail marketers have natural gas
delivered to the entry point of Washington Gass
distribution system on behalf of those utility customers that
have decided to acquire their natural gas commodity on an
unbundled basis, as discussed below.
During fiscal year 2009, total sendout on the system was
1,716 million therms, compared to total sendout of
1,610 million therms during fiscal year 2008. This excludes
the sendout of sales and deliveries of natural gas used for
electric generation. The increase in 2009 was the result of
weather in fiscal year 2009 that was colder than fiscal year
2008. The sendout for fiscal year 2010 is estimated at
1,626 million therms (based on normal weather), excluding
the sendout for the sales and deliveries of natural gas used for
9
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
electric generation. The sources of delivery and related volumes
that were used to satisfy the requirements of fiscal year 2009
and those projected for pipeline year 2010 are shown in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources of Delivery for Annual Sendout
|
|
|
|
(In millions of therms)
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
Sources of Delivery
|
|
Actual 2008
|
|
|
Actual 2009
|
|
|
Projected 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Firm Transportation
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
Transportation Storage
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
Hampshire Storage, Company-Owned Propane-Air Plants, and other
Peak-Shaving Resources
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Unregulated Third Party Marketers
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
|
|
1,716
|
|
|
|
1,626
|
|
|
Design Day
Sendout
The effectiveness of Washington Gass capacity resource
plan is largely dependent on the sources used to satisfy
forecasted and actual customer demand requirements for its
design day. For planning purposes, Washington Gas assumes that
all interruptible customers will be curtailed on the design day.
Washington Gass forecasted design day demand for the
2009-2010
winter season is 18.4 million therms and Washington
Gass projected sources of delivery for design day sendout
is 19.4 million therms. This provides a reserve margin of
approximately 5.3%. Washington Gas plans for the optimal
utilization of its storage and peaking capacity to reduce its
dependency on firm transportation and to lower pipeline capacity
costs. The following table reflects the sources of delivery that
are projected to be used to satisfy the forecasted design day
sendout estimate for fiscal year 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected Sources of Delivery for Design Day Sendout
|
|
|
|
(In millions of therms)
|
|
Fiscal Year 2010
|
|
|
|
Sources of Delivery
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
Firm Transportation
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
Transportation Storage
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
Hampshire Storage, Company-Owned Propane-Air Plants, and other
Peak- Shaving Resources
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Unregulated Third Party Marketers
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Natural Gas
Unbundling
At September 30, 2009, customer choice programs for natural
gas customers were available to all of Washington Gass
regulated utility customers in the District of Columbia,
Maryland and Virginia. These programs allow customers to choose
to purchase their natural gas from unregulated third party
marketers, rather than purchasing this commodity as part of a
bundled service from the local utility. Of Washington Gass
1.064 million active customers at September 30, 2009,
approximately 149,000 customers purchased
10
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
their natural gas commodity from unregulated third party
marketers. The following table provides the status of customer
choice programs in Washington Gass jurisdictions at
September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Status of Customer Choice Programs
|
|
At September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Jurisdiction
|
|
Customer Class
|
|
Eligible Customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
% Participating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia
|
|
|
Firm:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
138,863
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
12,838
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
|
Interruptible
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
Maryland
|
|
|
Firm:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
402,227
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
29,349
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
|
Interruptible
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Virginia
|
|
|
Firm:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
452,467
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
27,633
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
|
Interruptible
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064,071
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
When customers choose to purchase the natural gas commodity from
unregulated third party marketers, Washington Gass net
income is not affected because Washington Gas charges its
customers the cost of gas without any
mark-up.
When customers select an unregulated third party marketer as
their gas supplier, Washington Gas continues to charge these
customers to deliver natural gas through its distribution system
at rates identical to the delivery portion of the bundled sales
service customers.
Competition
The Natural Gas
Delivery Function
The natural gas delivery function, the core business of
Washington Gas, continues to be regulated by local regulatory
commissions. In developing this core business, Washington Gas
has invested $3.2 billion as of September 30, 2009 to
construct and operate a safe and reliable natural gas
distribution system. Because of the high fixed costs and
significant safety and environmental considerations associated
with building and operating a distribution system, Washington
Gas expects to continue being the only owner and operator of a
natural gas distribution system in its current franchise area
for the foreseeable future. The nature of Washington Gass
customer base and the distance of most customers from interstate
pipelines mitigate the threat of bypass of its facilities by
other potential delivery service providers.
Competition with
Other Energy Products
Washington Gas faces competition based on customers
preference for natural gas compared to other energy products and
the comparative prices of those products. In the residential
market, which generates a significant portion of Washington
Gass net income, the most significant product competition
occurs between natural gas and electricity. Because the cost of
electricity is affected by the cost of fuel used to generate
electricity, such as natural gas, Washington Gas generally
maintains a price advantage over competitive electricity supply
in its service area for traditional residential uses of energy
such as heating, water heating and cooking. Washington Gas
continues to attract the majority of the new residential
construction market in its service territory, and
consumers continuing preference for natural gas allows
Washington Gas to maintain a strong market presence.
In the interruptible market, fuel oil is the prevalent energy
alternative to natural gas. Washington Gass success in
this market depends largely on the relationship between natural
gas and oil prices. The supply of natural gas primarily is
derived from domestic
11
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
sources, and the relationship between supply and demand
generally has the greatest impact on natural gas prices. As a
large portion of oil comes from foreign sources, political
events can have significant influences on oil supplies and,
accordingly, oil prices.
RETAIL
ENERGY-MARKETING SEGMENT
Description
The retail energy-marketing segment consists of the operations
of WGEServices, which competes with regulated utilities and
other unregulated third party marketers to sell natural gas
and/or
electricity directly to residential, commercial and industrial
customers in Maryland, Virginia, Delaware and the District of
Columbia. WGEServices contracts for its supply needs and buys
and resells natural gas and electricity with the objective of
earning a profit through competitively priced contracts with
end-users. These commodities are delivered to retail customers
through the distribution systems owned by regulated utilities
such as Washington Gas or other unaffiliated natural gas or
electric utilities. Washington Gas delivers the majority of
natural gas sold by WGEServices, and unaffiliated electric
utilities deliver all of the electricity sold. Additionally,
WGEServices bills its customers through the billing services of
the regulated utilities that deliver its commodities as well as
directly through its own billing capabilities. WGEServices is
also expanding its renewable energy and energy conservation
product and service offerings. During the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009, WGEServices contracted for and
completed the construction of one Solar Photovoltaic (Solar PV)
facility, which includes ownership of the operational asset, and
has contracted for two additional facilities that are expected
to be completed by December 31, 2009. Other than these
facilities, WGEServices does not own or operate any natural gas
or electric generation, production, transmission or distribution
assets. Continued expansion may include the ownership of other
renewable energy producing assets.
At September 30, 2009, WGEServices served approximately
151,000 residential, commercial and industrial natural gas
customers and approximately 113,000 residential, commercial and
industrial electricity customers located in Maryland, Virginia,
Delaware and the District of Columbia. WGEServices is not
dependent on a single customer or concentration of customers
such that the loss of any one or more of such customers would
have a significant adverse effect on its business.
Factors critical to the success of the retail energy-marketing
segment include: (i) managing the market risk of the
difference between the sales price committed to customers under
sales contracts and the cost of natural gas and electricity
needed to satisfy these sales commitments;
(ii) managing credit risks associated with customers
and suppliers; (iii) having sufficient
deliverability of natural gas and electric supplies and
transportation to serve the demand of its customers which can be
affected by the ability of natural gas producers, pipeline
gatherers, natural gas processors, interstate pipelines,
electricity generators and regional electric transmission
operators to deliver the respective commodities;
(iv) access to sources of liquidity;
(v) controlling the level of selling, general and
administrative expenses, including customer acquisition expenses
and (vi) the ability to access markets through
customer choice programs or other forms of deregulation. The
retail energy-marketing segments total operating revenues
from external customers for fiscal year 2009 was
$1.2 billion, and $1.1 billion for each fiscal year
ended 2008 and 2007.
Seasonality of
Business Operations
The operations of WGEServices are seasonal, with larger amounts
of electricity being sold in the summer months and larger
amounts of natural gas being sold in the winter months. Working
capital requirements vary significantly during the year, and
these variations are financed primarily through WGL
Holdings issuance of commercial paper and unsecured
short-term bank loans. WGEServices accesses these funds through
the WGL Holdings money pool. This money pool also accumulates
cash from the periodic issuance of WGL Holdings common stock and
the operations of certain unregulated subsidiaries, and provides
short-term loans to other unregulated subsidiaries to meet
various working capital needs.
Natural Gas
Supply
WGEServices purchases its natural gas from a number of wholesale
suppliers in order to minimize its supply costs and to avoid
relying on any single provider for its natural gas supply.
Natural gas supplies are delivered to WGEServices market
territories through several interstate natural gas pipelines. To
supplement WGEServices natural gas supplies during periods
of high customer demand, WGEServices maintains gas storage
inventory in storage facilities that are assigned by natural gas
utilities such as Washington Gas. This storage inventory enables
WGEServices to meet daily and monthly fluctuations in demand and
to minimize the effect of market price volatility.
12
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
Electricity
Supply
The PJM Interconnection (PJM) is a regional transmission
organization that regulates and coordinates generation supply
and the wholesale delivery of electricity in the states and
jurisdictions where WGEServices operates. WGEServices buys
wholesale and sells retail electricity in the PJM market
territory and is subject to its rules and regulations. PJM
requires that its market participants have sufficient load
capacity to serve their customers load requirements. As
such, WGEServices has entered into contracts with multiple
electricity suppliers to purchase its electricity and electric
capacity needs. These contracts cover various periods ranging
from one month to several years into the future.
Competition
Natural
Gas
WGEServices competes with the commodity prices offered by
regulated gas utilities and other third party marketers to sell
natural gas to customers both inside and outside of the
Washington Gas service area. Marketers of natural gas compete
largely on price; therefore, gross margins are relatively small.
To determine competitive pricing and in adherence to its risk
management policies and procedures, WGEServices manages its
natural gas contract portfolio by closely matching the timing of
gas purchases from wholesale suppliers with retail sales
commitments to customers. For a discussion of WGEServices
exposure to and management of price risk, refer to the section
entitled Market RiskPrice Risk Related to the
Retail Energy-Marketing Segment in Managements
Discussion.
Electricity
WGEServices competes with regulated electric utilities and other
third party marketers to sell electricity to customers.
Marketers of electric supply compete largely on price;
therefore, gross margins are relatively small. To determine
competitive pricing and in adherence to its risk management
policies and procedures, WGEServices manages its electricity
contract portfolio by closely matching the timing of electricity
purchases from suppliers with sales commitments to customers.
For a discussion of WGEServices exposure to and management
of price risk, refer to the section entitled Market
RiskPrice Risk Related to the Retail Energy-Marketing
Segment in Managements Discussion.
WGEServices electric sales opportunities are significantly
affected by the price for Standard Offer Service (SOS) offered
by electric utilities. These rates are periodically reset based
on the regulatory requirements in each jurisdiction and customer
class. From
time-to-time,
significant sales opportunities may exist or sales opportunities
may be very limited due to the relationship of these SOS rates
to current market prices.
DESIGN-BUILD
ENERGY SYSTEMS SEGMENT
Description
The design-build energy systems segment, which consists of the
operations of WGESystems, provides design-build energy efficient
and sustainable solutions to governmental and commercial
clients. WGESystems focuses on upgrading the mechanical,
electrical, water and energy-related systems of large
governmental and commercial facilities by implementing both
traditional as well as alternative energy technologies,
primarily in the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia.
The design-build energy systems segment derived approximately
80% of its revenues from various agencies of the Federal
Government in fiscal year 2009.
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, WGESystems had a backlog
of $42.0 million and $39.3 million, respectively. This
backlog only includes work associated with signed contracts. Of
the backlog as of September 30, 2009, the approximate value
of work to be completed beyond fiscal year 2010 was
$13.2 million.
Factors critical to the success of the design-build energy
systems segment include: (i) generating adequate
revenue from the government and private sectors in the facility
construction and retrofit markets; (ii) building a
stable base of customer relationships;
(iii) estimating and managing fixed-price contracts;
(iv) building and maintaining a stable base of
sub-contractor
relationships and (v) controlling selling, general
and administrative expenses.
13
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
Competition
There are many competitors in this business segment. Within the
government sector, competitors primarily include companies
performing Energy Savings Performance Contracting (ESPC) as well
as utilities performing under Utility Energy Saving Contracts
(UESC). In the commercial markets, in addition to ESPCs and
UESCs, competitors include manufacturers of equipment and
control systems and consulting firms. WGESystems competes on the
basis of strong customer relationships developed over many years
of implementing successful projects, developing and maintaining
strong supplier relationships, and focusing in areas where it
can bring relative expertise.
ENVIRONMENTAL
MATTERS
We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations
related to environmental matters. These evolving laws and
regulations may require expenditures over a long timeframe to
control environmental effects. Almost all of the environmental
liabilities we have recorded are for costs expected to be
incurred to remediate sites where we or a predecessor affiliate
operated manufactured gas plants (MGPs). Estimates of
liabilities for environmental response costs are difficult to
determine with precision because of the various factors that can
affect their ultimate level. These factors include, but are not
limited, to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the complexity of the site;
|
|
|
|
changes in environmental laws and regulations at the federal,
state and local levels;
|
|
|
|
the number of regulatory agencies or other parties involved;
|
|
|
|
new technology that renders previous technology obsolete or
experience with existing technology that proves ineffective;
|
|
|
|
the level of remediation required and
|
|
|
|
variations between the estimated and actual period of time that
must be dedicated to respond to an environmentally contaminated
site.
|
Washington Gas has identified up to ten sites where it or its
predecessors may have operated MGPs. Washington Gas last used
any such plant in 1984. In connection with these operations, we
are aware that coal tar and certain other by-products of the gas
manufacturing process are present at or near some former sites,
and may be present at others. Based on the information available
to us, we have concluded that none of the sites are likely to
present an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment.
At one of the former MGP sites, studies show the presence of
coal tar under the site and an adjoining property. Washington
Gas has taken steps to control the movement of contaminants into
an adjacent river by installing a water treatment system that
removes and treats contaminated groundwater at the site.
Washington Gas received approval from governmental authorities
for a comprehensive remediation plan for the majority of the
site that permits commercial development of Washington
Gass property. Washington Gas has entered into an
agreement with a national developer for the development of this
site in phases. The first two phases have been completed, with
Washington Gas retaining a ground lease on each phase. A Record
of Decision for that portion of the site not owned by Washington
Gas was issued in August, 2006. Negotiations on a consent
agreement regarding remediation of that property were postponed
when the site was transferred in late 2007 to a new governmental
owner and the governmental entities involved agreed to review
how the transfer impacts the Record of Decision. On
September 21, 2006, governmental authorities notified
Washington Gas of their desire to have the utility investigate
and remediate river sediments in the area directly in front of
the former MGP site. There has been no agreement among
Washington Gas and governmental authorities as to the type and
level of sediment investigation and remediation that should be
undertaken for this area of the river; accordingly, we cannot
estimate at this time the potential future costs of such
investigation and remediation.
At a second former MGP site and on an adjacent parcel of land,
Washington Gas developed a monitoring-only
remediation plan for the site. This remediation plan received
approval under a state voluntary closure program.
We do not expect that the ultimate impact of these matters will
have a material adverse effect on our capital expenditures,
earnings or competitive position. At the remaining eight sites,
either the appropriate remediation is being undertaken, or no
remediation should be necessary. See Note 12 of the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of
environmental response costs.
14
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (concluded)
OTHER
INFORMATION
At September 30, 2009, we had 1,410 employees
comprising 1,316 utility and 94 non-utility employees. At
September 30, 2008, we had 1,448 employees comprising
1,359 utility and 89 non-utility employees.
Our code of conduct, corporate governance guidelines, and
charters for the governance, audit and human resources
committees of the Board of Directors are available on the
corporate Web site www.wglholdings.com under the
Corporate Governance link, and any changes or
amendments to these documents will also be posted to this
section of our Web site. Copies also may be obtained by request
to the Corporate Secretary at WGL Holdings, Inc., 101
Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20080. We make
available free of charge on our corporate Web site, our annual
reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K,
and any amendments, as soon as reasonably practicable after such
reports have been electronically filed with or furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Additional information about
WGL Holdings is also available on its Web site and at the
address listed above.
Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer certified to the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on March 18, 2009 that, as of
that date, he was unaware of any violation by WGL Holdings of
the NYSEs corporate governance listing standards.
Our research and development costs during fiscal years 2009,
2008 and 2007 were not material.
15
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The risk factors described below should be read in conjunction
with other information included or incorporated by reference in
this annual report on
Form 10-K,
including an in-depth discussion of these risks in the section
entitled Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The
risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks
and uncertainties facing us.
HOLDING
COMPANY
Our business may be adversely affected if we are unable to
pay dividends on our common stock and principal and interest on
our outstanding debt.
WGL Holdings is a holding company whose assets consist primarily
of investments in our subsidiaries. Accordingly, we conduct all
of our operations through our subsidiaries. Our ability to pay
dividends on our common stock and to pay principal and accrued
interest on our outstanding debt depends on the payment of
dividends to us by certain of our subsidiaries or the repayment
of funds to us by our principal subsidiaries. The extent to
which our subsidiaries do not pay dividends or repay funds to us
may adversely affect our ability to pay dividends to holders of
our common stock and principal and interest to holders of our
debt.
If we are unable to access sources of liquidity or capital,
or the cost of funds increases significantly, our
subsidiaries business may be adversely affected.
Our ability to obtain adequate and cost effective financing
depends on our credit ratings as well as the liquidity of
financial markets. Our credit ratings depend largely on the
financial performance of our subsidiaries, and a downgrade in
our current credit ratings could adversely affect our access to
sources of liquidity and capital, as well as our borrowing costs.
WASHINGTON GAS
LIGHT COMPANY
Changes in the regulatory environment or unfavorable rate
regulation, which can be affected by new laws or political
considerations, may restrict or delay Washington Gass
ability to earn a reasonable rate of return on its invested
capital to provide utility service and to recover fully its
operating costs.
Washington Gas is regulated by the PSC of DC, the PSC of MD and
the SCC of VA. These regulatory commissions generally have
authority over many of the activities of Washington Gass
business including, but not limited to, the rates it charges to
its customers, the amount and type of securities it can issue,
the nature of investments it can make, the nature and quality of
services it provides, safety standards, collection practices and
other matters. These regulators also may modify Washington
Gass rates to change the level, type and methods that it
utilizes to recover its costs, including the costs to acquire,
store, transport and deliver natural gas. The extent to which
the actions of regulatory commissions restrict or delay
Washington Gass ability to earn a reasonable rate of
return on invested capital
and/or fully
recover operating costs may adversely affect its results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Washington Gass ability to meet customers natural
gas requirements may be impaired if its contracted gas supplies
and interstate pipeline and storage services are not available
or delivered in a timely manner.
Washington Gas is responsible for acquiring sufficient natural
gas supplies, interstate pipeline capacity and storage capacity
to meet current and future customers annual and seasonal
natural gas requirements. If Washington Gas is not able to
maintain a reliable and adequate natural gas supply and
sufficient pipeline capacity to deliver that supply, it may be
unable to meet its customers requirements. If Washington
Gas is unable to meet customers demand requirements, its
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows may be
adversely affected.
Washington Gas needs to acquire additional capacity to
deliver natural gas on the coldest days of the year and it may
not receive the necessary authorizations to do so in a timely
manner.
Washington Gas plans to construct a one billion cubic foot
liquefied natural gas (LNG) storage facility in Chillum,
Maryland, to meet its customers forecasted demand for
natural gas. The new storage facility is expected to be
completed and in service by the
2013-2014
winter heating season. If we are not permitted or are not able
to construct this planned facility on a timely basis for any
reason, the availability of the next best alternative (which is
to acquire additional interstate pipeline transportation or
storage capacity) may be limited by market supply and demand,
and the timing of Washington Gass participation in new
interstate pipeline
16
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1A. Risk Factors (continued)
construction projects. This could cause an interruption in
Washington Gass ability to satisfy the needs of some of
its customers, which could adversely affect its results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Operating issues could affect public safety and the
reliability of Washington Gass natural gas distribution
system, which could adversely affect Washington Gass
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Washington Gass business is exposed to operating issues
that could affect the public safety and reliability of its
natural gas distribution system. Operating issues such as leaks,
mechanical problems and accidents could result in significant
costs to Washington Gass business and loss of customer
confidence. The occurrence of any such operating issues could
adversely affect Washington Gass results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows. If Washington Gas is unable
to recover from customers through the regulatory process all or
some of these costs and its authorized rate of return on these
costs, this also could adversely affect Washington Gass
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The receipt of vaporized LNG into Washington Gass
natural gas distribution system may result in higher operating
expenses and capital expenditures which may have a material
adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows, and may impact system safety.
An increase in the volume of vaporized LNG, which contains a low
concentration of heavy hydrocarbons (HHCs), is likely to result
in increased leaks in Washington Gass distribution system.
Additional operating expenses and capital expenditures may be
necessary to contend with the receipt of increased volumes of
vaporized LNG into Washington Gas distribution system if
the current preventative and remedial measures to mitigate any
possible increase in leaks in effected portions of Washington
Gass distribution system are unsuccessful. These
additional expenditures may not be recoverable or may not be
recoverable on a timely basis from customers. Additionally, such
operating expenses and capital expenditures may not be timely
enough to mitigate the challenges posed by increased volumes of
vaporized LNG and could result in leakage in couplings at a rate
that could compromise the safety of our distribution system.
Therefore, these conditions could have a material adverse effect
on Washington Gass results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows, and may impact system safety.
Changes in the relative prices of alternative forms of energy
may strengthen or weaken the competitive position of Washington
Gass natural gas delivery service. If the competitive
position of natural gas service weakens, it may reduce the
number of natural gas customers in the future and negatively
affect Washington Gass future cash flows and net
income.
The price of natural gas delivery service that Washington Gas
provides competes with the price of other forms of energy such
as electricity, oil and propane. Changing prices of natural gas
versus other sources of energy that Washington Gas competes
against can cause the competitive position of our natural gas
delivery service to improve or decline. A decline in the
competitive position of natural gas service in relation to
alternative energy sources can lead to fewer natural gas
customers, lower volumes of natural gas delivered, lower cash
flows and lower net income.
A decline in the economy may reduce net revenue growth and
reduce future net income and cash flows.
A decline in the economy of the region in which Washington Gas
operates might adversely affect Washington Gass ability to
grow its customer base and collect revenues from customers,
which may negatively affect net revenue growth and increase
costs. An increase in the interest rates Washington Gas pays
without the recognition of the higher cost of debt incurred by
it in the rates charged to its customers would adversely affect
future net income and cash flows.
If Washington Gas is unable to access sources of liquidity or
capital, or the cost of funds increases significantly,
Washington Gass business may be adversely affected.
Washington Gass ability to obtain adequate and cost
effective financing depends on its credit ratings as well as the
liquidity of financial markets. Washington Gass credit
ratings depend largely on its financial performance, and a
downgrade in Washington Gass current credit ratings could
adversely affect its access to sources of liquidity and capital,
as well its borrowing costs and ability to earn its authorized
rate of return.
As a wholly owned subsidiary of WGL Holdings, Washington Gas
depends solely on WGL Holdings to raise new common equity
capital and contribute that common equity to Washington Gas. If
WGL Holdings is unable to raise common equity capital, this also
could adversely affect Washington Gass credit ratings and
its ability to earn its authorized rate of return.
17
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1A. Risk Factors (continued)
Washington Gass risk management strategies and related
hedging activities may not be effective in managing its risks,
and may result in additional liability for which rate recovery
may be disallowed and cause increased volatility in its
earnings.
Washington Gass business requirements expose it to
commodity price, weather, credit and interest-rate risks.
Washington Gas attempts to manage its exposure to these risks by
hedging, setting risk limits and employing other risk management
tools and procedures. Risk management activities may not be as
effective as planned, and cannot eliminate all of its risks.
Washington Gas also may be exposed to additional liability
should the anticipated revenue recovery of costs or losses
incurred with certain of these risk management activities be
subsequently excluded from the determination of revenues by a
regulator.
Washington Gass facilities and operations may be
impaired by acts of terrorism.
Washington Gass natural gas distribution, transmission and
storage facilities may be targets of terrorist activities that
could result in a disruption of its ability to meet customer
requirements. Terrorist attacks may also disrupt capital markets
and Washington Gass ability to raise capital. A terrorist
attack on Washington Gass facilities or those of its
natural gas suppliers or customers could result in a significant
decrease in revenues or a significant increase in repair costs,
which could adversely affect its results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows.
Washington Gas may face certain regulatory and financial
risks related to climate change legislation.
A number of proposals to limit greenhouse gas emissions,
measured in carbon dioxide equivalent units, are pending at the
regional, federal, and international level. These proposals
would require us to measure and potentially limit greenhouse gas
emissions from our utility operations and our customers or
purchase allowances for such emissions. While we cannot predict
with certainty the extent of these limitations or when they will
become effective, the adoption of such proposals could:
|
|
|
|
|
increase utility costs related to operations, energy efficiency
activities and compliance;
|
|
|
|
affect the demand for natural gas and
|
|
|
|
increase the prices we charge our utility customers.
|
The occurrence of any such legislation could adversely affect
Washington Gass results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows. If Washington Gas is unable to recover from
customers through the regulatory process all or some of these
costs and its authorized rate of return on these costs, this
also could adversely affect Washington Gass results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
WASHINGTON GAS
ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
WGEServices business, earnings and cash requirements
are highly weather sensitive and seasonal.
The operations of WGEServices, our retail energy-marketing
subsidiary, are weather sensitive and seasonal, with a
significant portion of revenues derived from the sale of natural
gas to retail customers for space heating during the winter
months, and from the sale of electricity to customers for
cooling during the summer months. Weather conditions directly
influence the volume of natural gas and electricity delivered to
customers. Weather conditions can also affect the short-term
pricing of energy supplies that WGEServices may need to procure
to meet the needs of its customers. Deviations in weather from
normal levels and the seasonal nature of WGEServices
business can create large variations in earnings and short-term
cash requirements.
The ability of WGEServices to meet customers natural
gas and electricity requirements may be impaired if contracted
supply is not available or delivered in a timely manner.
Sufficient capability to deliver natural gas and electric
supplies to serve the demand of WGEServices customers is
dependent upon the ability of natural gas producers, pipeline
gatherers, natural gas processors, interstate pipelines,
suppliers of electricity and regional electric transmission
operators to meet these requirements. If WGEServices is unable
to secure adequate supplies in a timely manner, either due to
the failure of its suppliers to deliver the contracted commodity
or the inability to secure additional quantities during
significant abnormal weather conditions, it may be unable to
meet its customer requirements. Such inability to meet its
delivery obligations to customers could result in WGEServices
experiencing defaults on contractual terms with its customers,
penalties and financial damage payments, the loss of certain
licenses and operating authorities,
and/or a
need to return customers to the regulated utility companies,
such as Washington Gas.
18
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1A. Risk Factors (concluded)
The risk management strategies and related hedging activities
of WGEServices may not be effective in managing risks and may
cause increased volatility in its earnings.
WGEServices is exposed to commodity price risk to the extent its
natural gas and electricity purchases are not closely matched to
its sales commitments in terms of volume and pricing.
WGEServices attempts to manage its exposure to commodity price
risk, as well as its exposure to weather and credit risks by
hedging, setting risk limits, and employing other risk
management tools and procedures. These risk management
activities may not be as effective as planned, and cannot
eliminate all of WGEServices risks.
Significant increases in interest rates may increase
costs.
WGEServices depends on short-term debt to finance its accounts
receivable and storage gas inventories. Working capital
requirements vary significantly during the year and are financed
primarily through the issuance of commercial paper and unsecured
short-term bank loans by WGL Holdings. The results of operations
of WGEServices could be adversely affected if short-term
interest rates rose or if we were unable to access capital in a
cost-effective manner.
WGEServices is dependent on guarantees and access to cash
collateral from WGL Holdings.
The ability of WGEServices to purchase natural gas and
electricity from suppliers is dependent upon guarantees issued
on its behalf by WGL Holdings, and upon access to cash
collateral through the issuance of commercial paper and
unsecured short-term bank loans by WGL Holdings. Should WGL
Holdings not renew such guarantees, provide access to cash
collateral, or if WGL Holdings credit ratings are
downgraded, the ability of WGEServices to make commodity
purchases at reasonable prices may be impaired, adversely
affecting its results of operations, financial condition and
cash flows.
Regulatory developments may negatively affect WGEServices.
The regulations that govern the conduct of competitive energy
marketers are subject to change as the result of legislation or
regulatory proceedings. Changes in these regulatory rules could
reduce customer growth opportunities for WGEServices, or could
reduce the profit opportunities associated with certain groups
of existing or potential new customers and, thereby, adversely
affect its results of operations, financial condition and cash
flows.
Competition may negatively affect WGEServices.
WGEServices competes with other non-regulated retail suppliers
of natural gas and electricity, as well as with the commodity
rate offerings of electric and gas utilities. Increases in
competition including utility commodity rate offers that are
below prevailing market rates may result in a loss of sales
volumes or a reduction in growth opportunities that could
adversely affect results of operations, financial condition and
cash flows.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
19
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 2. Properties
At September 30, 2009, we provided services in various
areas of the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia, and
held certificates of convenience and necessity, licenses and
permits necessary to maintain and operate their respective
properties and businesses. The regulated utility segment is the
only segment where property, plant and equipment are significant
assets.
Property, plant and equipment is stated at original cost,
including labor, materials, taxes and overhead costs incurred
during the construction period. Washington Gas calculates
depreciation applicable to its utility gas plant in service
primarily using a straight-line method over the estimated
remaining life of the plant. The composite depreciation and
amortization rate of the regulated utility was 3.12%, 3.23% and
3.19% during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively,
which included an allowance for estimated accrued non-legal
asset removal costs (see Note 1 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements).
At September 30, 2009, Washington Gas had approximately
659 miles of transmission mains, 12,353 miles of
distribution mains, and 13,497 miles of distribution
services. Washington Gas has the storage capacity for
approximately 15 million gallons of propane for
peak-shaving.
Washington Gas owns approximately 40 acres of land and a
building (built in 1970) at 6801 Industrial Road in
Springfield, Virginia. The Springfield site houses both
operating and certain administrative functions of the utility.
Washington Gas also holds title to land and buildings used as
substations for its utility operations.
Washington Gas also has peaking facilities to enhance
deliverability in periods of peak demand in the winter that
consist of propane air plants in Springfield, Virginia
(Ravensworth Station), and Rockville, Maryland (Rockville
Station). Hampshire owns full and partial interests in, and
operates underground natural gas storage facilities in Hampshire
County, West Virginia. Hampshire accesses the storage field
through 12 storage wells that are connected to an
18-mile
pipeline gathering system. Concurrent with acquiring and
protecting its storage rights, Hampshire has historically
acquired certain exploration and development rights in West
Virginia principally in the Marcellus Shale and other shale
formations. These rights are predominately owned by lease and
they are applicable to approximately 26,000 gross acres for
the storage facilities of which 13,000 acres of land
surrounding its storage facilities may be subject to exploration
in addition to its storage function. Hampshire also operates a
compressor station utilized to increase line pressure for
injection of gas into storage. For fiscal year 2010, we estimate
that the Hampshire storage facility has the capacity to supply
approximately 2.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas to
Washington Gass system for meeting winter season demands.
Washington Gas owns a
12-acre
parcel of land located in Southeast Washington, D.C.
Washington Gas entered into an agreement with a national
developer to develop this land in phases. Washington Gas
selected the developer to design, execute and manage the various
phases of the development. The development, Maritime Plaza, is
intended to be a mixed-use commercial project that will be
implemented in five phases. The first two phases have been
developed, with Washington Gas retaining a
99-year
ground lease on each phase. See the section entitled
Environmental Matters under Item 1 of
this report for additional information regarding this
development.
Facilities utilized by our corporate headquarters, as well as by
the retail energy-marketing and energy design-build systems
segments, are located in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan
area and are leased.
The Mortgage of Washington Gas dated January 1, 1933
(Mortgage), as supplemented and amended, securing any First
Mortgage Bonds (FMBs) it issues, constitutes a direct lien on
substantially all property and franchises owned by Washington
Gas other than a small amount of property that is expressly
excluded. At September 30, 2009 and 2008, there was no debt
outstanding under the Mortgage.
Washington Gas executed a supplemental indenture to its
unsecured Medium-Term Note (MTN) Indenture on September 1,
1993, providing that Washington Gas will not issue any FMBs
under its Mortgage without securing all MTNs with all other debt
secured by the Mortgage.
20
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
None.
21
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANTS
The names, ages and positions of the executive officers of the
registrants at October 31, 2009, are listed below along
with their business experience during the past five years. The
age of each officer listed is as of the date of filing of this
report. There is no family relationship among the officers.
Unless otherwise indicated, all officers have served
continuously since the dates indicated, and all positions are
executive officers listed with Washington Gas Light Company.
|
|
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
Date Elected or
|
Name, Age and Position with the
registrants
|
|
Appointed
|
|
|
Vincent L. Ammann, Jr., Age 50 (1)
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WGL Holdings,
Inc.
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
Vice PresidentFinance
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
Vice PresidentFinance of WGL Holdings, Inc.
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
Assistant to the Chief Financial Officer
|
|
March 29, 2004
|
|
|
|
Beverly J. Burke, Age 58 (1)
|
|
|
Vice President and General Counsel
|
|
July 1, 2001
|
Vice President and General Counsel of WGL Holdings, Inc.
|
|
July 1, 2001
|
|
|
|
Gautam Chandra, Age 43 (1)
|
|
|
Vice PresidentBusiness Development, Strategy and Business
Process Outsourcing
|
|
October 1, 2009
|
Vice PresidentBusiness Development, Strategy, Business
Process Outsourcing and Non-Utility Operations of WGL Holdings,
Inc.
|
|
October 1, 2009
|
Vice PresidentBusiness Process Outsourcing
|
|
July 2, 2007
|
Vice PresidentBusiness Process Outsourcing and Non-Utility
Operations of WGL Holdings, Inc.
|
|
July 2, 2007
|
Vice PresidentPerformance Improvement
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
Vice PresidentPerformance Improvement and Non-Utility
Operations of WGL Holdings, Inc.
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
Division HeadFinance Support and Non-Utility
Businesses
|
|
January 5, 2004
|
Division HeadAchieving Operational Excellence
|
|
December 12, 2002
|
|
|
|
Adrian P. Chapman, Age 52 (1)
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
October 1, 2009
|
President and Chief Operating Officer of WGL Holdings, Inc.
|
|
October 1, 2009
|
Vice PresidentOperations, Regulatory Affairs and Energy
Acquisition
|
|
October 1, 2005
|
Vice PresidentRegulatory Affairs and Energy Acquisition
|
|
March 31, 1999
|
|
|
|
Marcellous P. Frye, Jr., Age 42 (2)
|
|
|
Vice PresidentSupport Services
|
|
March 21, 2008
|
Division HeadInformation Technology
|
|
July 2, 2007
|
DirectorDevelopment and ITS Engineering
|
|
August 15, 2005
|
|
|
|
Eric C. Grant, Age 52 (3)
|
|
|
Vice PresidentCorporate Relations
|
|
October 1, 2009
|
DirectorCorporate Communications
|
|
September 4, 2007
|
|
|
|
Terry D. McCallister, Age 53 (1)
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
October 1, 2009
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of WGL
Holdings, Inc.
|
|
October 1, 2009
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
October 1, 2001
|
President and Chief Operating Officer of WGL Holdings, Inc.
|
|
October 1, 2001
|
22
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
|
|
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
Date Elected or
|
Name, Age and Position with the
registrants
|
|
Appointed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony M. Nee, Age 53 (1,4)
|
|
|
Treasurer
|
|
February 14, 2009
|
Treasurer of WGL Holdings, Inc.
|
|
February 14, 2009
|
Division HeadRisk Management
|
|
December 8, 2003
|
Department HeadRisk Management
|
|
February 10, 2003
|
|
|
|
Mark P. OFlynn, Age 59 (1)
|
|
|
Controller
|
|
February 18, 2002
|
Controller of WGL Holdings, Inc.
|
|
February 18, 2002
|
|
|
|
Douglas V. Pope, Age 64 (1)
|
|
|
Secretary of WGL Holdings, Inc.
|
|
January 13, 2000
|
Secretary
|
|
July 25, 1979
|
Roberta W. Sims, Age 55
|
|
|
Vice PresidentRegulatory Affairs and Energy Acquisition
|
|
October 1, 2009
|
Vice PresidentCorporate Relations and Communication
|
|
January 31, 1996
|
|
|
|
Douglas A. Staebler, Age 49 (5)
|
|
|
Vice PresidentEngineering and Construction
|
|
October 31, 2006
|
Division HeadEngineering
|
|
July 25, 2005
|
|
|
|
William Zeigler, Jr., Age 64
|
|
|
Vice PresidentHuman Resources and Organizational
Development
|
|
February 1, 2004
|
Division HeadOrganizational Development
|
|
February 10, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Executive Officer of both WGL
Holdings, Inc. and Washington Gas Light Company.
|
|
(2)
|
Mr. Frye was previously
employed by Global eXchange Services (formerly known as GE
Global eXchange Services) based in Gaithersburg, Maryland, where
he served as Vice President for Global Application Development.
Mr. Frye also held various leadership positions for General
Electric Information Services in Rockville, Maryland.
|
|
(3)
|
Mr. Grant was previously
employed by The Washington Post newspaper where he served as the
Director of Communications, Public Relations and Corporate
Philanthropy and the newspapers primary
spokesperson.
|
|
(4)
|
Mr. Nee joined Washington
Gas in 2003, overseeing compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley
requirements and the energy risk management function. He has
over 20 years of experience in various finance positions in
the natural gas and electric power industries. Mr. Nee
started his career as a CPA, spending 10 years in public
accounting with the Pittsburgh office of Arthur Young.
|
|
(5)
|
Mr. Staebler was previously
employed by NUI CorporationElizabethtown Gas where he held
various positions in engineering, operations and construction
and maintenance.
|
23
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
ITEM 6. SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Years Ended September 30,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY OF EARNINGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility
|
|
$
|
1,481,089
|
|
|
$
|
1,536,443
|
|
|
$
|
1,497,274
|
|
|
$
|
1,622,510
|
|
|
$
|
1,379,390
|
|
Non-utility
|
|
|
1,225,767
|
|
|
|
1,091,751
|
|
|
|
1,148,734
|
|
|
|
1,015,373
|
|
|
|
783,953
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
2,706,856
|
|
|
$
|
2,628,194
|
|
|
$
|
2,646,008
|
|
|
$
|
2,637,883
|
|
|
$
|
2,163,343
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
120,373
|
|
|
$
|
116,523
|
|
|
$
|
107,900
|
|
|
$
|
94,694
|
|
|
$
|
106,072
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock
|
|
$
|
120,373
|
|
|
$
|
116,523
|
|
|
$
|
107,900
|
|
|
$
|
87,578
|
|
|
$
|
103,493
|
|
Earnings per average common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
2.35
|
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
$
|
1.94
|
|
|
$
|
2.18
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
2.35
|
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
2.39
|
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
$
|
1.94
|
|
|
$
|
2.16
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock
|
|
$
|
2.39
|
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
$
|
1.79
|
|
|
$
|
2.11
|
|
CAPITALIZATION-YEAR END
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,097,698
|
|
|
$
|
1,047,564
|
|
|
$
|
980,767
|
|
|
$
|
921,807
|
|
|
$
|
893,992
|
|
Washington Gas Light Company preferred stock
|
|
|
28,173
|
|
|
|
28,173
|
|
|
|
28,173
|
|
|
|
28,173
|
|
|
|
28,173
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding maturities
|
|
|
561,830
|
|
|
|
603,738
|
|
|
|
616,419
|
|
|
|
576,139
|
|
|
|
584,150
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
1,687,701
|
|
|
$
|
1,679,475
|
|
|
$
|
1,625,359
|
|
|
$
|
1,526,119
|
|
|
$
|
1,506,315
|
|
|
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assetsyear-end
|
|
$
|
3,349,890
|
|
|
$
|
3,243,543
|
|
|
$
|
3,046,361
|
|
|
$
|
2,791,406
|
|
|
$
|
2,601,081
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment-netyear-end
|
|
$
|
2,269,141
|
|
|
$
|
2,208,302
|
|
|
$
|
2,150,441
|
|
|
$
|
2,067,895
|
|
|
$
|
1,969,016
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual basis
(a)
|
|
$
|
137,505
|
|
|
$
|
131,433
|
|
|
$
|
158,101
|
|
|
$
|
161,496
|
|
|
$
|
124,014
|
|
Cash basis adjustments
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
3,528
|
|
|
|
6,430
|
|
|
|
(1,739
|
)
|
|
|
(11,246
|
)
|
|
Cash basis
|
|
$
|
138,908
|
|
|
$
|
134,961
|
|
|
$
|
164,531
|
|
|
$
|
159,757
|
|
|
$
|
112,768
|
|
|
Long-term obligationsyear-end
|
|
$
|
561,830
|
|
|
$
|
603,738
|
|
|
$
|
616,419
|
|
|
$
|
576,139
|
|
|
$
|
584,150
|
|
COMMON STOCK DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized dividends per share
|
|
$
|
1.47
|
|
|
$
|
1.42
|
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
1.4575
|
|
|
$
|
1.4075
|
|
|
$
|
1.3650
|
|
|
$
|
1.3450
|
|
|
$
|
1.3225
|
|
Closing price
|
|
$
|
33.14
|
|
|
$
|
32.45
|
|
|
$
|
33.89
|
|
|
$
|
31.34
|
|
|
$
|
32.13
|
|
Book value per shareyear-end
|
|
$
|
21.89
|
|
|
$
|
20.99
|
|
|
$
|
19.89
|
|
|
$
|
18.86
|
|
|
$
|
18.36
|
|
Return on average common equity
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
Dividend yield on book value
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
Dividend payout ratio
|
|
|
60.7
|
%
|
|
|
59.9
|
%
|
|
|
62.3
|
%
|
|
|
74.7
|
%
|
|
|
62.1
|
%
|
Shares outstandingyear-end (thousands)
|
|
|
50,143
|
|
|
|
49,917
|
|
|
|
49,316
|
|
|
|
48,878
|
|
|
|
48,704
|
|
UTILITY GAS SALES AND DELIVERIES (thousands of
therms)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas sold and delivered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential firm
|
|
|
689,986
|
|
|
|
627,527
|
|
|
|
648,701
|
|
|
|
593,594
|
|
|
|
625,251
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm
|
|
|
203,039
|
|
|
|
199,363
|
|
|
|
203,962
|
|
|
|
213,997
|
|
|
|
222,587
|
|
Interruptible
|
|
|
3,377
|
|
|
|
6,543
|
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
6,185
|
|
|
|
7,809
|
|
|
Total gas sold and delivered
|
|
|
896,402
|
|
|
|
833,433
|
|
|
|
857,938
|
|
|
|
813,776
|
|
|
|
855,647
|
|
|
Gas delivered for others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm
|
|
|
462,051
|
|
|
|
433,991
|
|
|
|
433,420
|
|
|
|
403,812
|
|
|
|
434,099
|
|
Interruptible
|
|
|
273,820
|
|
|
|
256,626
|
|
|
|
267,305
|
|
|
|
251,003
|
|
|
|
279,924
|
|
Electric generation
|
|
|
102,759
|
|
|
|
92,176
|
|
|
|
111,950
|
|
|
|
108,315
|
|
|
|
73,874
|
|
|
Total gas delivered for others
|
|
|
838,630
|
|
|
|
782,793
|
|
|
|
812,675
|
|
|
|
763,130
|
|
|
|
787,897
|
|
|
Total utility gas sales and deliveries
|
|
|
1,735,032
|
|
|
|
1,616,226
|
|
|
|
1,670,613
|
|
|
|
1,576,906
|
|
|
|
1,643,544
|
|
|
OTHER STATISTICS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active customer metersyear-end
|
|
|
1,064,071
|
|
|
|
1,053,032
|
|
|
|
1,046,201
|
|
|
|
1,031,916
|
|
|
|
1,012,105
|
|
New customer meters added
|
|
|
11,011
|
|
|
|
12,962
|
|
|
|
19,373
|
|
|
|
24,693
|
|
|
|
26,682
|
|
Heating degree daysactual
|
|
|
4,211
|
|
|
|
3,458
|
|
|
|
3,955
|
|
|
|
3,710
|
|
|
|
4,023
|
|
Weather percent colder (warmer) than normal
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Excludes Allowance for Funds
Used During Construction and prepayments associated with capital
projects. Includes accruals for capital expenditures and other
non-cash additions.
|
25
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
INTRODUCTION
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (Managements
Discussion) analyzes the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of WGL Holdings, Inc. (WGL Holdings)
and its subsidiaries. It also includes managements
analysis of past financial results and potential factors that
may affect future results, potential future risks and approaches
that may be used to manage them. Except where the content
clearly indicates otherwise, WGL Holdings,
we, us or our refers to the
holding company or the consolidated entity of WGL Holdings and
all of its subsidiaries.
Managements Discussion is divided into the following two
major sections:
|
|
|
|
|
WGL HoldingsThis section describes the financial
condition and results of operations of WGL Holdings and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. It includes discussions of
our regulated and unregulated operations. WGL Holdings
operations are derived from the results of Washington Gas Light
Company (Washington Gas) and Hampshire Gas Company and the
results of our non-utility operations.
|
|
|
|
Washington GasThis section describes the financial
condition and results of operations of Washington Gas, a wholly
owned subsidiary that comprises the majority of our regulated
utility segment.
|
Both of the major sections of Managements
DiscussionWGL Holdings and Washington Gasare
designed to provide an understanding of our operations and
financial performance and should be read in conjunction with the
respective companys financial statements and the combined
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this annual report.
Unless otherwise noted, earnings per share amounts are presented
on a diluted basis, and are based on weighted average common and
common equivalent shares outstanding.
26
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Managements
Discussion Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
EXECUTIVE
OVERVIEW
Introduction
WGL Holdings, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, sells and
delivers natural gas and provides a variety of energy-related
products and services to customers primarily in the District of
Columbia and the surrounding metropolitan areas in Maryland and
Virginia. Our core subsidiary, Washington Gas, engages in the
delivery and sale of natural gas that is regulated by regulatory
commissions in the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia.
Through the wholly owned unregulated subsidiaries of Washington
Gas Resources Corporation (Washington Gas Resources), we also
offer energy-related products and services. We offer
competitively priced natural gas and electricity to customers
through Washington Gas Energy Services (WGEServices), our
unregulated retail energy-marketing subsidiary. We also offer
design-build energy efficient and sustainable solutions focused
on upgrading energy related systems of large government and
commercial facilities through Washington Gas Energy Systems
(WGESystems).
WGL Holdings has three operating segments that are described
below:
|
|
|
|
|
regulated utility;
|
|
|
|
retail energy-marketing and
|
|
|
|
design-build energy systems.
|
Transactions that are not significant enough on a stand-alone
basis to warrant treatment as an operating segment, and that do
not fit into one of our three operating segments, are aggregated
as Other Activities and included as part of
non-utility operations.
Regulated Utility. With approximately
91% of our consolidated total assets, the regulated utility
segment consists of Washington Gas and Hampshire Gas Company
(Hampshire). Washington Gas, a wholly owned subsidiary of WGL
Holdings, delivers natural gas to retail customers in accordance
with tariffs approved by the regulatory commissions that have
jurisdiction over Washington Gass rates. Washington Gas
also sells natural gas to customers who have not elected to
purchase natural gas from unregulated third party marketers.
The rates charged to utility customers are designed to recover
Washington Gass operating expenses and natural gas
commodity costs and to provide a return on its investment in the
net assets used in its firm gas sales and delivery service.
Washington Gas recovers the cost of the natural gas to serve
firm customers through the gas cost recovery mechanisms as
approved in jurisdictional tariffs. Any difference between the
firm customer gas costs incurred and the gas costs recovered
from those firm customers is deferred on the balance sheet as an
amount to be collected from, or refunded to, customers in future
periods. Therefore, increases or decreases in the cost of gas
associated with sales made to firm customers have no direct
effect on Washington Gass net revenues and net income.
27
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Washington Gass asset optimization program utilizes
Washington Gass storage and transportation capacity
resources when not fully being used to physically serve utility
customers by entering into commodity-related physical and
financial contracts with third parties with the objective of
deriving a profit to be shared with its utility customers (refer
to the section entitled Market Risk for a
further discussion of our asset optimization program). Unless
otherwise noted, therm deliveries shown related to Washington
Gas or the regulated utility segment do not include therms
delivered related to our asset optimization program.
Hampshire, a wholly owned subsidiary of WGL Holdings, is
regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
Hampshire operates and owns full and partial interests in
underground natural gas storage facilities including pipeline
delivery facilities located in and around Hampshire County, West
Virginia. Washington Gas purchases all of the storage services
of Hampshire and includes the cost of these services in the
bills sent to its customers. Hampshire operates under a
pass-through cost of service-based tariff approved
by the FERC, and adjusts its billing rates to Washington Gas on
a periodic basis to account for changes in its investment in
utility plant and associated expenses.
Retail Energy-Marketing. The retail
energy-marketing segment consists of the operations of
WGEServices, a wholly owned subsidiary of Washington Gas
Resources. WGEServices competes with regulated utilities and
other unregulated third party marketers to sell natural gas
and/or
electricity directly to residential, commercial and industrial
customers in Maryland, Virginia, Delaware and the District of
Columbia. WGEServices contracts for its supply needs and buys
and resells natural gas and electricity with the objective of
earning a profit through competitively priced contracts with
end-users. These commodities are delivered to retail customers
through the distribution systems owned by regulated utilities
such as Washington Gas or other unaffiliated natural gas or
electric utilities. WGEServices is also expanding its renewable
energy and energy conservation product and service offerings.
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009,
WGEServices contracted for and completed the construction of one
Solar PV facility, which includes ownership of the operational
asset, and has contracted for two additional facilities that are
expected to be completed by December 31, 2009. Other than
these facilities, WGEServices does not own or operate any
natural gas or electric generation, production, transmission or
distribution assets. Continued expansion may include the
ownership of other renewable energy producing assets.
Design-Build Energy Systems. Our
design-build energy systems segment, which consists of the
operations of Washington Gas Energy Systems, Inc. (WGESystems),
provides design-build energy efficient and sustainable solutions
to government and commercial clients. WGESystems focuses on
upgrading the mechanical, electrical, water and energy-related
systems of large government and commercial facilities by
implementing both traditional as well as alternative energy
technologies, primarily in the District of Columbia, Maryland
and Virginia.
Refer to the Business section under Item 1 of this
report for further discussion of our regulated utility and
non-utility business segments. For further discussion of our
financial performance by operating segment, refer to
Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
PRIMARY FACTORS
AFFECTING WGL HOLDINGS AND WASHINGTON GAS
The following is a summary discussion of the primary factors
that affect the operations
and/or
financial performance of our regulated and unregulated
businesses. Refer to the sections entitled
Business and Risk Factors
under Item 1 and Item 1A, respectively, of this
report for additional discussion of these and other factors that
affect the operations
and/or
financial performance of WGL Holdings and Washington Gas.
Weather
Conditions and Weather Patterns
Washington Gas. Washington Gass
operations are seasonal, with a significant portion of its
revenues derived from the delivery of natural gas to residential
and commercial heating customers during the winter heating
season. Weather conditions directly influence the volume of
natural gas delivered by Washington Gas. Weather patterns tend
to be more volatile during shoulder months within
our fiscal year in which Washington Gas is going into or coming
out of the primary portion of its winter heating season. During
the shoulder months within quarters ending December 31
(particularly in October and November) and June 30 (particularly
in April and May), customer heating usage may not correlate
highly with historical levels or with the level of heating
degree days (HDDs) that occur, particularly when weather
patterns experienced are not consistently cold or warm.
28
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Washington Gass rates are determined on the basis of
expected normal weather conditions. Washington Gas has a weather
protection strategy that is designed to neutralize the estimated
financial effects of variations from normal weather. Refer to
the section entitled Market RiskWeather
Risk for a further discussion of Washington Gass
weather protection strategies.
WGEServices. The financial results of
our retail energy-marketing subsidiary, WGEServices, are also
affected by deviations in weather from normal levels and
abnormal customer usage during the shoulder months described
above. Since WGEServices sells both natural gas and electricity,
WGEServices financial results may fluctuate due to
unpredictable deviations in weather during the winter heating
and summer cooling seasons. WGEServices purchases weather
derivatives to help manage this risk. Refer to the section
entitled Market RiskWeather Risk for
further discussion of WGEServices weather derivatives.
Regulatory
Environment and Regulatory Decisions
Washington Gas is regulated by the Public Service Commission of
the District of Columbia (PSC of DC), the Public Service
Commission of Maryland (PSC of MD) and the State
Corporation Commission of Virginia (SCC of VA). These regulatory
commissions approve the terms and conditions of service and the
rates that Washington Gas can charge customers for its
rate-regulated services in their respective jurisdictions.
Changes in these rates as ordered by regulatory commissions
affect Washington Gass financial performance.
Washington Gas expects that regulatory commissions will continue
to set the prices and terms for delivery service that give it an
opportunity to recover reasonable operating expenses and earn a
just and reasonable rate of return on the capital invested in
its distribution system.
Natural
Gas Supply and Pipeline Transportation and Storage
Capacity
Natural
Gas Supply and Capacity Requirements
Washington Gas. Washington Gas is
responsible for acquiring sufficient natural gas supplies,
interstate pipeline capacity and storage capacity to meet its
customer requirements. As such, Washington Gas must contract for
both reliable and adequate supplies and delivery capacity to its
distribution system, while considering: (i) the
dynamics of the commodity supply and interstate pipeline and
storage capacity markets; (ii) its own on-system
natural gas peaking facilities and (iii) the
characteristics of its customer base. Energy-marketing companies
that sell natural gas to customers located within Washington
Gas service territory are responsible for acquiring
natural gas for their customers; however, Washington Gas
allocates certain storage and pipeline capacity related to these
customers in accordance with regulatory requirements.
The increase in demand for pipeline and storage capacity
compared to the available capacity is a business issue for local
distribution companies, such as Washington Gas. Aside from the
past year or two when the economy and housing market was in a
recession, historically, Washington Gass customer base has
grown at an annual rate of approximately two percent. It is
expected to return to this historical growth rate over the next
few years as the new housing market recovers. To help maintain
the adequacy of pipeline and storage capacity for its growing
customer base, Washington Gas has contracted with various
interstate pipeline and storage companies to expand its
transportation and storage capacity services to Washington Gas.
These capacity expansion projects are expected to be placed into
service during fiscal years
2010-2015.
Additionally, Washington Gas anticipates enhancing its peaking
capacity by constructing a liquefied natural gas (LNG) peaking
facility that is expected to be completed and placed in service
by the
2013-2014
winter heating season (refer to the section entitled
Liquidity and Capital ResourcesCapital
Expenditures). Washington Gas will continue to monitor
other opportunities to acquire or participate in obtaining
additional pipeline and storage capacity that will support
customer growth and improve or maintain the high level of
service expected by its customer base.
WGEServices. WGEServices contracts for
storage and pipeline capacity to meet its customers needs
primarily through transportation releases and storage services
allocated from the utility companies in the various service
territories in which they are providing retail energy marketing.
Diversity
of Natural Gas Supply
Washington Gas. An objective of
Washington Gass supply sourcing strategy is to diversify
receipts from multiple production areas to meet all firm
customers natural gas supply requirements. This strategy
is designed to protect Washington Gass receipt of supply
from being curtailed by possible financial difficulties of a
single supplier, natural disasters and other unforeseen events.
29
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
WGEServices. WGEServices diversifies
its wholesale supplier base in order to minimize its supply
costs and avoid the negative impacts of relying on any single
provider for its natural gas supply. To supplement
WGEServices natural gas supplies during periods of high
customer demand, WGEServices maintains gas inventories in
storage facilities that are allocated by natural gas utilities
such as Washington Gas.
Volatility
of Natural Gas Prices
Volatility of natural gas prices does impact customer usage and
has different short-term and long-term effects on our business.
The impact is also different between the regulated utility
segment and the unregulated retail energy-marketing segment as
described below.
Washington Gas. Under its regulated gas
cost recovery mechanisms, Washington Gas records cost of gas
expense equal to the cost of gas that is recovered in revenues
from customers for each period reported. An increase in the cost
of gas due to an increase in the purchase price of the natural
gas commodity generally has no direct effect on Washington
Gass net income. However, to the extent Washington Gas
does not have regulatory mechanisms in place to mitigate the
indirect effects of higher gas prices, its net income may
decrease for factors such as: (i) lower natural gas
consumption caused by customer conservation;
(ii) increased short-term interest expense to
finance a higher accounts receivable balance and
(iii) higher expenses for uncollectible accounts. A
Revenue Normalization Adjustment (RNA) billing mechanism in
Maryland and other regulatory mechanisms in both Maryland and
Virginia help to mitigate these effects on Washington Gass
revenue and net income. Increases in the price of natural gas
can also affect our operating cash flows. Long term impacts of
volatile natural gas prices relate to the relative cost of
natural gas service versus the availability of substitute
products such as electricity, propane and fuel oil.
WGEServices. WGEServices may be
negatively affected by the indirect effects of significant
increases or decreases in the wholesale price of natural gas.
WGEServices risk management policies and procedures are
designed to minimize the risk that WGEServices purchase
commitments and the related sales commitments do not closely
match (refer to the section entitled Market
Risk for further discussion of WGEServices
mitigation of commodity price risk). Additionally, in the
short-term, higher natural gas prices may increase the costs
associated with uncollectible accounts, borrowing costs, certain
fees paid to public service commissions and other costs. To the
extent that these costs cannot be recovered from retail
customers due to competitive factors, WGEServices
operating results would be negatively affected. In the
long-term, natural gas sales for WGEServices are subject to the
same impacts of volatile natural gas prices as described above
for Washington Gas.
Non-Weather
Related Changes in Natural Gas Consumption Patterns
Natural gas supply requirements are affected by changes in the
natural gas consumption patterns of our customers that are
driven by factors other than weather. Natural gas usage per
customer may decline as customers change their consumption
patterns in response to: (i) more volatile and
higher natural gas prices, as discussed above;
(ii) customers replacement of older, less
efficient gas appliances with more efficient appliances and
(iii) a decline in the economy in the region in
which we operate. In each jurisdiction in which Washington Gas
operates, changes in customer usage profiles have been reflected
in recent rate case proceedings where rates have been adjusted
to reflect current customer usage. In the District of Columbia,
decreases in customer usage by existing customers that occur
subsequent to its most recent rate case proceeding will have the
effect of reducing revenues, which may be offset by the
favorable effect of adding new customers. Under the RNA
mechanism in Maryland, changes in customer usage by existing
customers that occur subsequent to recent rate case proceedings
in the Maryland jurisdiction generally will not reduce revenues
because the RNA mechanism stabilizes the level of delivery
charge revenues received from customers. In Virginia, a
declining block rate structure partially mitigates the income
statement effects of declines in consumption.
Maintaining
the Safety and Reliability of the Natural Gas Distribution
System
Maintaining and improving the public safety and reliability of
Washington Gass natural gas distribution system is our
highest priority which provides benefits to both customers and
investors through lower costs and improved customer service.
Washington Gas continually refines its safety practices, with a
particular focus on design, construction, maintenance,
operation, replacement, inspection and monitoring practices.
Operational issues affecting the public safety and reliability
of Washington Gass natural gas distribution system that
are not addressed within a timely and adequate manner could
significantly and adversely affect our future earnings and cash
flows, as well as result in a loss of customer confidence.
30
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Washington Gas is experiencing operational issues associated
with the receipt of vaporized LNG from the Cove Point LNG
terminal owned by Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP and Dominion
Transmission Inc. (collectively Dominion), and a planned
expansion of this terminal. Refer to the section entitled
Operating Issues Related To Cove Point Natural Gas
Supply for a discussion of the specific operational
issues involved.
Competitive
Environment
Washington Gas. Washington Gas faces
competition based on customers preference for natural gas
compared to other energy products, and the comparative prices of
those products. The most significant product competition occurs
between natural gas and electricity in the residential market.
Changes in the competitive position of natural gas relative to
electricity and other energy products have the potential of
causing a decline in the number of future natural gas customers.
At present, Washington Gas has seen no significant evidence that
changes in the competitive position of natural gas has
contributed to such a decline.
The residential market generates a significant portion of
Washington Gass net income. In its service territory,
Washington Gas continues to attract the majority of the new
residential construction market. Consumers continuing
preference for natural gas allows Washington Gas to maintain a
strong market presence.
In each of the jurisdictions served by Washington Gas,
regulators and utilities have implemented customer choice
programs to purchase natural gas. These programs allow customers
the choice of purchasing their natural gas from unregulated
third party marketers, rather than from the local utility. There
is no effect on Washington Gass net income when customers
purchase their natural gas commodity from unregulated third
party marketers because Washington Gas charges its customers the
cost of gas without any
mark-up.
WGEServices. Our unregulated retail
energy-marketing subsidiary, WGEServices, competes with
regulated utilities and other unregulated third party marketers
to sell the natural gas and electric commodity to customers.
Marketers of these commodities compete largely on price;
therefore, gross margins (representing revenues less costs of
energy) are relatively small. WGEServices is exposed to credit
and market risks associated with both its natural gas and
electric supply (refer to the sections entitled Credit
Risk and Market Risk for further
discussion of these risk exposures and how WGEServices manages
them).
WGEServices electric sales opportunities are significantly
affected by the price for Standard Offer Service (SOS) offered
by electric utilities. These rates, often identified by customer
class, are periodically reset based on the regulatory
requirements in each jurisdiction. Future opportunities to add
new electric customers will be dependent on the competitiveness
of the relationship between WGEServices service rates, SOS
rates offered by local electric utilities and prices offered by
other energy marketers.
Environmental
Matters
We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations
related to environmental matters. These evolving laws and
regulations may require expenditures over a long timeframe. It
is our position that, at this time, the appropriate remediation
is being undertaken at all the relevant sites. Refer to
Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for further discussion of these matters.
Industry
Consolidation
In recent years, the energy industry has seen a number of
consolidations, combinations, disaggregations and strategic
alliances. Consolidation will present combining entities with
the challenges of remaining focused on the customer and
integrating different organizations. Others in the energy
industry are discontinuing operations in certain portions of the
energy industry or divesting portions of their business and
facilities.
From time to time, we perform studies and, in some cases, hold
discussions regarding utility and energy-related investments and
strategic transactions with other companies. The ultimate effect
on us of any such investments and transactions that may occur
cannot be determined at this time.
Economic
Conditions and Interest Rates
We operate in one of the nations largest regional
economies, including several of the nations wealthiest
counties. Over time, the economic strength of our service
territory has allowed Washington Gas to expand its regulated
delivery service customer base at a
31
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
relatively stable rate. In addition, the region provides an
active market for our subsidiaries to market natural gas,
electricity and other energy-related products and services.
More recently, the economic downturn that began in 2007 and
carried through the first half of 2009 now shows tenuous signs
of ending. While Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth turned
positive in the third calendar quarter of 2009, unemployment
remains a serious concern, both nationally and locally. Falling
energy prices helped mitigate increases in uncollectible
accounts expense in fiscal 2009, but our customer growth rate
continued to be lower than pre-recession levels.
If economic recovery has indeed begun, it could be sluggish in
the near term. The effects on both WGL Holdings and Washington
Gas may include the following: (i) continued levels
of customer conservation;
(ii) year-over-year
increases in uncollectible accounts expense; and
(iii) continued low growth rates in customers and
related capital expenditures. Refer to Non-Weather
Related Changes in Natural Gas Consumption Patterns,
above, for a discussion of regulatory mechanisms in place to
mitigate the effects of customer conservation at Washington Gas.
Consumer demand for goods, services, and energy may not pick up
until unemployment and tight consumer credit conditions ease,
leading to a flat or deflationary environment.
While capital market conditions have improved somewhat in 2009,
especially for high-credit-quality issuers, a lack of credit
availability for builders and homebuyers may keep new
construction growth at low rates, even as housing prices begin
to stabilize. Refer to Inflation/Deflation
below for a discussion of the regulatory impacts of
deflation and the section entitled General Factors
Affecting Liquidity for a discussion of our access to
capital markets. We expect that the effects of a sluggish
economy would be partially mitigated for us by continued
government spending in our region.
Improvements in the growth of the economy could affect the value
of our pension plan assets. Continued market improvements could
result in lower expenses and funding requirements for our
pension and other post-retirement benefit plans in future years.
We require short-term debt financing to effectively manage our
working capital needs and long-term debt financing to support
the capital expenditures of Washington Gas. A rise in interest
expense paid without the timely recognition of the higher cost
of debt in the utility rates charged by Washington Gas to its
customers could adversely affect future earnings. A rise in
short-term interest rates without the higher cost of debt being
reflected in the prices charged to customers could negatively
affect the results of operations of our retail energy-marketing
segment.
Inflation/Deflation
From time to time, Washington Gas seeks approval for rate
increases from regulatory commissions to help it manage the
effects of inflation on its operating costs, capital investment,
and returns. A significant impact of inflation is on Washington
Gass replacement cost of plant and equipment. While the
regulatory commissions having jurisdiction over Washington
Gass retail rates allow depreciation only on the basis of
historical cost to be recovered in rates, we anticipate that
Washington Gas should be allowed to recover the increased costs
of its investment and earn a return thereon after replacement of
the facilities occurs. Recovery of increased capital and
operating costs could be delayed in jurisdictions where
performance-based rate plans limit Washington Gass ability
to file for base rate increases.
To the extent Washington Gas experiences a sustained
deflationary economic environment, earned returns on invested
capital could rise and exceed the levels established in our
latest regulatory proceedings. If such circumstances occur
during a period or within a jurisdiction not covered by an
approved performance-based rate plan, Washington Gas could be
subject to a regulatory review to reduce future customer rates
in those jurisdictions.
Use
of Business Process Outsourcing
During fiscal year 2007, Washington Gas entered into a
10-year
business process outsourcing (BPO) agreement to outsource
certain of its business processes related to human resources,
information technology, consumer services and finance
operations. While Washington Gas expects the agreement to
benefit customers and shareholders during the term of the
contract, the continued management of service levels provided is
critical to the success of this outsource arrangement.
The majority of these selected business processes have already
been transitioned to Accenture PLC (Accenture). The remaining
transition items are expected to be completed by spring of 2010.
Washington Gas has implemented a BPO Governance organization and
a comprehensive set of processes to monitor and control the cost
effectiveness and quality of services provided through the BPO.
32
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Labor
Contracts, Including Labor and Benefit Costs
Washington Gas has five labor contracts with bargaining units
represented by three labor unions. In May 2007, Washington Gas
entered into a five-year labor contract with the Teamsters Local
Union No. 96 (Local 96), an affiliate of the International
Brotherhood of Teamsters. The contract covers approximately
600 employees and is effective through May 31, 2012.
In August 2008, Washington Gas entered into a 30 month
labor contract with The Office and Professional Employees
International Union Local No. 2 (A.F.L.-C.I.O.). The
contract covers approximately 120 employees and is
effective beginning October 1, 2008 through March 31,
2011. Local 96, representing union-eligible employees in the
Shenandoah Gas division of Washington Gas, has a five-year labor
contract with Washington Gas that became effective on
June 14, 2007 and expires on July 31, 2012. This
contract covers 23 employees. Additionally, on
August 1, 2009, Washington Gas entered into two new
two-year labor contracts with the International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers Local 1900 that together, cover approximately
30 employees. These two contracts expire on July 31,
2011. Washington Gas is subject to the terms of its labor
contracts with respect to operating practices and compensation
matters dealing with employees represented by the various
bargaining units described above.
Changes
in Accounting Principles
We cannot predict the nature or the effect of potential future
changes in accounting regulations or practices that have yet to
be issued on our operating results and financial condition. New
accounting standards could be issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) or the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) that could change the way we record and
recognize revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in
compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the
United States of America (GAAP) requires the selection and the
application of appropriate technical accounting guidance to the
relevant facts and circumstances of our operations, as well as
our use of estimates to compile the consolidated financial
statements. The application of these accounting policies
involves judgment regarding estimates and projected outcomes of
future events, including the likelihood of success of particular
regulatory initiatives, the likelihood of realizing estimates
for legal and environmental contingencies, and the probability
of recovering costs and investments in both the regulated
utility and non-regulated business segments.
We have identified the following critical accounting policies
discussed below that require our judgment and estimation, where
the resulting estimates have a material effect on the
consolidated financial statements.
Accounting
for Unbilled Revenue
For regulated deliveries of natural gas, Washington Gas reads
meters and bills customers on a monthly cycle basis. The billing
cycles for customers do not coincide with the accounting periods
used for financial reporting purposes. Washington Gas accrues
unbilled revenues for gas that has been delivered but not yet
billed at the end of an accounting period. In connection with
this accrual, Washington Gas must estimate the amount of gas
that has not been accounted for on its delivery system and must
estimate the amount of the unbilled revenue by jurisdiction and
customer class. A similar computation is made for WGEServices to
accrue unbilled revenues.
Accounting
for Regulatory OperationsRegulatory Assets and
Liabilities
A significant portion of our business is subject to regulation
by independent government regulators. As the regulated utility
industry continues to address competitive market issues, the
cost-of-service
regulation used to compensate Washington Gas for the cost of its
regulated operations will continue to evolve. Non-traditional
ratemaking initiatives and market-based pricing of products and
services could have additional long-term financial implications
for us. The carrying cost of Washington Gass investment in
fixed assets assumes continued regulatory oversight of our
operations.
Washington Gass jurisdictional tariffs contain mechanisms
that provide for the recovery of the cost of gas applicable to
firm customers. Under these mechanisms, Washington Gas
periodically adjusts its firm customers rates to reflect
increases and decreases in the cost of gas. Annually, Washington
Gas reconciles the difference between the gas costs collected
from firm customers and the cost of gas incurred. Washington Gas
defers any excess or deficiency and either recovers it from, or
refunds it to, customers over a subsequent twelve-month period.
33
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Washington Gas accounts for its regulated operations in
accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
Topic 980, Regulated Operations (ASC Topic 980), which
results in differences in the application of GAAP between
regulated and unregulated businesses. ASC Topic 980 requires
recording regulatory assets and liabilities for certain
transactions that would have been treated as expense or revenue
in unregulated businesses. Future regulatory changes or changes
in the competitive environment could result in WGL Holdings and
Washington Gas discontinuing the application of ASC Topic 980
for some of its business and require the write-off of the
portion of any regulatory asset or liability that would be no
longer probable of recovery or refund. If Washington Gas were
required to discontinue the application of ASC Topic 980 for any
of its operations, it would record a non-cash charge or credit
to income for the net book value of its regulatory assets and
liabilities. Other adjustments might also be required.
The current regulatory environment and Washington Gass
specific facts and circumstances support both the continued
application of FASB ASC Topic 980 for our regulatory activities
and the conclusion that all of our regulatory assets and
liabilities as of September 30, 2009 are recoverable or
refundable through rates charged to customers.
Accounting
for Income Taxes
We recognize deferred income tax assets and liabilities for all
temporary differences between the financial statement basis and
the tax basis of assets and liabilities, including those where
regulators prohibit deferred income tax treatment for ratemaking
purposes of Washington Gas. Regulatory assets or liabilities,
corresponding to such additional deferred tax assets or
liabilities, may be recorded to the extent recoverable from or
payable to customers through the ratemaking process. Amounts
applicable to income taxes due from and due to customers
primarily represent differences between the book and tax basis
of net utility plant in service.
Effective October 1, 2007, we adopted FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (ASC
Topic 740, Income Taxes). ASC Topic 740 clarifies the
accounting for uncertain events related to income taxes
recognized in financial statements. This interpretation
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.
Accounting
for Contingencies
We account for contingent liabilities utilizing ASC Topic 450,
Contingencies. By their nature, the amount of the
contingency and the timing of a contingent event are subject to
our judgment of such events and our estimates of the amounts.
Actual results related to contingencies may be difficult to
predict and could differ significantly from the estimates
included in reported earnings. For a discussion of
contingencies, see Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Accounting
for Derivative Instruments
We enter into both physical and financial contracts for the
purchase and sale of natural gas and electricity. We designate a
portion of our physical contracts related to the purchase of
natural gas and electricity to serve our customers as
normal purchases and normal sales and therefore,
they are not subject to the
mark-to-market
accounting requirements of ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and
Hedging. The financial contracts and the portion of the
physical contracts that qualify as derivative instruments and
are subject to the
mark-to-market
accounting requirements are recorded on the balance sheet at
fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments
recoverable or refundable to customers and therefore subject to
ASC Topic 980 are recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities
while changes in the fair value of derivative instruments not
affected by rate regulation are reflected in income. Washington
Gas also utilizes derivative instruments that are designed to
minimize the risk of interest-rate volatility associated with
planned issuances of debt securities.
Our judgment is required in determining the appropriate
accounting treatment for our derivative instruments. This
judgment involves various factors, including our ability to:
(i) evaluate contracts and other activities as
derivative instruments subject to the accounting guidelines of
ASC Topic 815; (ii) determine whether or not our
derivative instruments are recoverable from or refundable to
customers in future periods and (iii) derive the
estimated fair value of our derivative instruments.
If available, fair value is based on actively quoted market
prices. In the absence of actively quoted market prices, we seek
indicative price information from external sources, including
broker quotes and industry publications. If pricing information
from external sources is not available, we must estimate prices
based on available historical and near-term future price
information
and/or the
use of statistical methods and models that we developed. These
models reflect derivative pricing theory, formulated market
inputs and forward price projections for various periods.
34
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Accounting
for Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit
Plans
Washington Gas maintains a qualified, trusteed,
employee-non-contributory defined benefit pension plan
(qualified pension plan) covering most active and vested former
employees of Washington Gas and a separate non-funded
supplemental retirement plan (SERP) covering executive officers.
Washington Gas accrues the estimated benefit obligation of the
SERP as earned by the covered employees and Washington Gas pays,
from internal funds, the individual benefits as they are due.
Washington Gas also provides certain healthcare and life
insurance benefits for retired employees which are accrued and
funded in a trust on an actuarial basis over the work life of
the retirees. The qualified pension plan, SERP and health and
post-retirement plans are collectively referred to as the
Plans.
On July 20, 2009, Washington Gas announced changes to the
non-contributory defined benefit pension plan to introduce a new
employer-provided retirement benefit under the Washington Gas
Light Company Savings Plan (Savings Plan) for
current management and newly hired employees. With the
introduction of the new retirement benefit, effective
January 1, 2010, current management employees have the
option to either remain in the pension plan or cease
participating in the pension plan and receive an enhanced
contribution under the Savings Plan. Management employees hired
after July 1, 2009, are not eligible to participate in the
qualified pension plan.
The measurement of the Plans obligations and costs is
dependent on a variety of factors, such as employee
demographics, the level of contributions made to the Plans,
earnings on the Plans assets and mortality rates. The
following assumptions are also critical to this measurement.
These assumptions are derived on an annual basis with the
assistance of a third party actuarial firm:
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate,
|
|
|
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets,
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase and
|
|
|
|
Healthcare cost trend rate.
|
We determine the discount rate by using publicly available
indexes from reliable financial sources that parallel the
duration of plan liabilities including:
(i) consideration and review of average bond yields
for 30 year maturities; (ii) bonds with the
highest yields at each maturity that are of sufficient quality
(AA- or better); (iii) bond yields that are
interpolated to prior years (iv) and pension
liability indexes. We determine the expected long-term rate of
return by averaging the expected earnings for the target asset
portfolio. In developing the expected rate of return assumption,
we evaluate an analysis of historical actual performance and
long-term return projections, which gives consideration to the
asset mix and anticipated length of obligation of the Plans.
Historically, the expected long-term return on plan assets has
been lower for the health and life benefit plan than for the
qualified pension plan due to differences in the allocation of
the assets in the plan trusts and the taxable status of one of
the trusts. We calculate the rate of compensation increase based
on salary expectations for the near-term, expected inflation
levels and promotional expectations. The healthcare cost trend
rate is determined by working with insurance carriers, reviewing
historical claims data for the health and life benefit plan, and
analyzing market expectations.
The following table illustrates the effect of changing these
actuarial assumptions, while holding all other assumptions
constant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Changing Critical Actuarial Assumptions
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Health and Life Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage-Point
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
Increase
|
|
(Decrease) in
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
in Ending
|
|
(Decrease) in
|
|
Ending
|
|
(Decrease) in
|
Actuarial Assumptions
|
|
Assumption
|
|
Obligation
|
|
Annual Cost
|
|
Obligation
|
|
Annual Cost
|
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets
|
|
+/− 1.00 pt.
|
|
n/a
|
|
$(6.2) / $6.2
|
|
n/a
|
|
$(2.7) / $2.7
|
Discount rate
|
|
+/− 0.25 pt.
|
|
$(17.7) / $18.5
|
|
$(0.1) / $0.1
|
|
$(12.4) / $13.1
|
|
$(0.9) / $1.0
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
+/− 0.25 pt.
|
|
$2.7 / $(2.6)
|
|
$0.3 / $(0.3)
|
|
n/a
|
|
n/a
|
Healthcare cost trend rate
|
|
+/− 1.00 pt.
|
|
n/a
|
|
n/a
|
|
$54.1 / $(44.3)
|
|
$7.7 / $(6.3)
|
|
|
Differences between actuarial assumptions and actual plan
results are deferred and amortized into cost when the
accumulated differences exceed ten percent of the greater of the
Projected Benefit Obligation or the market-related value of the
plan assets. If necessary, the excess is amortized over the
average remaining service period of active employees. At
September 30, 2009, the discount rate decreased to 6.5%
from 7.5% from the comparable period, reflecting the change in
long-term interest rates primarily due to
35
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
current market conditions. Refer to Note 10 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for a listing of the actuarial
assumptions used and for a further discussion of the accounting
for the Plans.
OTHER ACCOUNTING
MATTERS
We account for our stock-based compensation in accordance with
ASC Topic 718, CompensationStock Compensation.
Under ASC Topic 718, we measure and record compensation expense
for both our stock option and performance share awards based on
their fair value at the date of grant. Our performance units,
however, are liability awards as they settle in cash; therefore,
we measure and record compensation expense for these awards
based on their fair value at the end of each period until their
vesting date. This may cause fluctuations in earnings that do
not exist under the accounting requirements for both our stock
options and performance shares.
We issued both performance shares and performance units in
fiscal year 2009; however, we did not issue stock options. As of
September 30, 2009, there are prior years option
grants outstanding with an exercise price at the market value of
our common stock on the date of the grant. Our stock options
generally have a vesting period of three years, and expire ten
years from the date of the grant.
Both our performance units and performance shares are valued
using a Monte Carlo simulation model, as they both contain
market conditions. Performance units and performance shares are
granted at target levels. Any performance units that may be
earned pursuant to terms of the grant will be paid in cash and
are valued at $1.00 per performance unit. Any performance shares
that are earned will be paid in shares of common stock of WGL
Holdings. The actual number of performance units and performance
shares that may be earned varies based on the total shareholder
return of WGL Holdings relative to a peer group over the three
year performance period. Median performance relative to the peer
group earns performance units and performance shares at the
targeted levels. The maximum that can be earned is 200% of the
targeted levels and the minimum is zero.
Refer to Notes 1 and 11 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for a further discussion of our share-based
awards.
36
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
WGL HOLDINGS,
INC.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
We analyze our results of operations using utility net revenues
and retail energy-marketing gross margins. Both utility net
revenues and retail energy-marketing gross margins are
calculated as revenues less the associated cost of energy and
applicable revenue taxes. We believe utility net revenues is a
better measure to analyze profitability than gross operating
revenues for our regulated utility segment because the cost of
the natural gas commodity and revenue taxes are generally
included in the rates that Washington Gas charges to customers
as reflected in operating revenues. Accordingly, changes in the
cost of gas and revenue taxes associated with sales made to
customers generally have no direct effect on utility net
revenues, operating income or net income. We consider gross
margins to be a better reflection of profitability than gross
revenues or gross energy costs for our retail energy-marketing
segment because gross margins are a direct measure of the
success of our core strategy of earning a profit through
competitively priced contracts for the purchase of commodity
supply and for the sale of natural gas and electricity to
end-users.
Neither utility net revenues nor retail energy-marketing gross
margins should be considered as an alternative to, or a more
meaningful indicator of, our operating performance than net
income. Our measures of utility net revenues and retail
energy-marketing gross margins may not be comparable to
similarly titled measures of other companies. Refer to the
sections entitled Results of OperationsRegulated
Utility Operating Results and Results of
OperationsNon-Utility Operating Results for the
calculation of utility net revenues and retail energy-marketing
gross margins, respectively, as well as a reconciliation to
operating income and net income for both segments.
Summary
Results
WGL Holdings reported net income of $120.4 million, or
$2.39 per share, for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2009, over net income of $116.5 million, or $2.33 per
share, and $107.9 million, or $2.19 per share, for the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. We earned a return on average common equity of
11.2%, 11.5% and 11.3%, respectively, during each of these three
fiscal years.
The following table summarizes our net income (loss) by
operating segment for fiscal years ended September 30,
2009, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) by Operating Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
vs. 2008
|
|
|
vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated Utility
|
|
$
|
106.0
|
|
|
$
|
113.7
|
|
|
$
|
89.9
|
|
|
$
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
23.8
|
|
Non-utility operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail energy-marketing
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
(17.6
|
)
|
Design-Build Energy Systems
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Other, principally non-utility activities
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
Total non-utility
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
(15.2
|
)
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
120.4
|
|
|
$
|
116.5
|
|
|
$
|
107.9
|
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
8.6
|
|
|
Earnings per average common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
2.35
|
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.39
|
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
The following is a summary discussion of
year-over-year
trends related to our results from continuing operations. For a
detailed description of material transactions and results, refer
to our discussion of operating results by segment below.
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year
2008. Net income for fiscal year 2009, when
compared to fiscal year 2008, reflects increased earnings from
our non-regulated retail energy-marketing segment, partially
offset by lower earnings from our regulated utility segment.
Favorably affecting fiscal year 2009 earnings for the retail
energy-marketing segment were higher gross margins from the sale
of natural gas and electricity, partially offset by higher
operating expenses related to increased marketing initiatives.
Earnings
37
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
comparisons for our regulated utility segment reflect the
unfavorable effects of changes in natural gas consumption
patterns that benefited 2008 net revenues and a scheduled
increase in the level of recurring service costs related to our
business process outsourcing, partially offset by additional net
revenues attributable to customer growth and lower employee
benefit expense.
Fiscal Year 2008 vs. Fiscal Year
2007. Net income for fiscal year 2008, when
compared to fiscal year 2007, reflects increased earnings from
our regulated utility segment, partially offset by lower
earnings from our retail energy-marketing segment. Favorably
affecting fiscal year 2008 earnings for the regulated utility
segment were new rates in all jurisdictions, favorable natural
gas consumption patterns and a new asset optimization strategy.
Earnings comparisons for our retail energy-marketing business
reflect lower gross margins from the sale of electricity,
partially offset by improved gross margins from natural gas.
Regulated
Utility Operating Results
The following table summarizes the regulated utility
segments operating results for fiscal years ended
September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated Utility Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
vs. 2008
|
|
|
vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Utility net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
1,505.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,552.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,513.8
|
|
|
$
|
(46.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
38.5
|
|
Less: Cost of gas
|
|
|
829.9
|
|
|
|
885.2
|
|
|
|
892.4
|
|
|
|
(55.3
|
)
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
Revenue taxes
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
|
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
55.9
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
Total utility net revenues
|
|
|
614.9
|
|
|
|
611.8
|
|
|
|
565.5
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
46.3
|
|
Operation and maintenance
|
|
|
255.5
|
|
|
|
250.1
|
|
|
|
246.3
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
94.5
|
|
|
|
94.2
|
|
|
|
89.9
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
General taxes and other assessmentsother
|
|
|
48.7
|
|
|
|
43.7
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
216.2
|
|
|
|
223.8
|
|
|
|
188.7
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
44.1
|
|
|
|
45.4
|
|
|
|
45.2
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Other (income)
expenses-net,
including preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
66.4
|
|
|
|
65.3
|
|
|
|
54.9
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
106.0
|
|
|
$
|
113.7
|
|
|
$
|
89.9
|
|
|
$
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
23.8
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year
2008. The regulated utility segment reported
net income of $106.0 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009, compared to net income of
$113.7 million reported for fiscal year 2008. The decrease
in net income primarily reflects: (i) the
$16.1 million unfavorable effects of changes in natural gas
consumption patterns that benefited fiscal year 2008;
(ii) $4.3 million higher net revenues in fiscal
year 2008 due to the timing of prior year rate relief in
Maryland; (iii) a $5.0 million scheduled
increase in recurring to service costs associated with the
implementation of the BPO agreement; (iv) a
$5.9 million lower of cost or market adjustment associated
with our asset optimization program; (v) a
$1.9 million increase in property and other general taxes
and (vi) a $1.8 million increase in
uncollectible accounts expense due to an adjustment to the
accumulated reserve in the current period to reflect changes in
economic conditions and an allowance for the effect of a
Maryland customer payment relief program.
Partially offsetting this decrease were: (i) a
$5.1 million increase in net revenues from customer growth
representing an increase of over 10,000 average active customer
meters over fiscal year 2008; (ii) a
$4.6 million reversal of a reserve for disallowed natural
gas costs in Maryland due to a February 5, 2009 Order from
the Public Service Commission of Maryland (PSC of MD);
(iii) a $4.6 million increase in unrealized
margins associated with our asset optimization program;
(iv) a $3.8 million decease in employee
benefits and (v) a $3.1 million decrease in
premium costs associated with our weather protection products
related to our District of Columbia territory. In addition,
under the Virginia Sharing Mechanism (ESM), a liability to
customers is accrued when regulated results exceed an earnings
threshold. The ESM threshold was exceeded in fiscal year 2008,
resulting in a reduction in earnings of
38
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
$5.6 million. During fiscal year 2009, earnings were
unaffected as regulated results did not exceed the ESM threshold
(refer to the section entitled Rates and Regulatory
MattersPerformance-Based Rate Plans included in
Managements Discussion for Washington Gas).
Fiscal Year 2008 vs. Fiscal Year
2007. The regulated utility segment reported
net income of $113.7 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008, an increase of $23.8 million over
net income of $89.9 million reported for fiscal year 2007.
This
year-over-year
increase in net income primarily reflects: (i) new
rates that went into effect in Virginia on February 13,
2007, Maryland on November 27, 2007 and the District of
Columbia on December 31, 2007; (ii) a
$13.2 million increase in realized margins associated with
our asset optimization program; (iii) the favorable
effects of changes in natural gas consumption patterns due to
shifts in weather patterns and other factors and
(iv) an increase of nearly 9,700 average active
customer meters over fiscal year 2007.
Partially offsetting this increase were: (i) an
$8.8 million increase in uncollectible accounts expense due
to a favorable adjustment to the accumulated reserve made in the
prior year to reflect better collections, coupled with the
negative effects of the decline in the economy in fiscal year
2008; (ii) a $2.6 million increase in expenses
related to paving and leak repair primarily as a result of
receiving gas from the Cove Point terminal in a portion of our
distribution system in Virginia and (iii) a
$5.6 million accrual for an estimated refund to our
Virginia customers arising from an ESM that was implemented in
2008 as a part of our Performance-Based Rate (PBR) plan (refer
to the section entitled Rates and Regulatory
MattersPerformance-Based Rate Plans included in
Managements Discussion for Washington Gas).
Utility Net Revenues. The following
table provides the key factors contributing to the changes in
the utility net revenues of the regulated utility segment
between years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of Changes in Utility Net Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
vs. 2008
|
|
|
vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Customer growth
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
Estimated Weather effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in
colder-than-normal
weather effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
Offset by weather insurance and derivative products
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
Estimated change in natural gas consumption patterns
|
|
|
(16.1
|
)
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Impact of rate cases
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
Gas administrative charge (GAC)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Asset optimization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized margins
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
Unrealized mark-to-market valuations
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Lower of cost or market adjustment
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
Storage carrying costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
ESM
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
Regulatory adjustment
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Reserve for disallowance of natural gas costs
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
46.3
|
|
|
Customer growthAverage active customer meters
increased 10,200 from fiscal year 2008 to 2009. Average active
customer meters increased 9,700 from fiscal year 2007 to 2008.
Estimated weather effectsWashington Gas has a
weather protection strategy that is designed to neutralize the
estimated financial effects of variations from normal weather
(refer to the section entitled Weather Risk
for further discussion of our weather protection strategy).
As part of this strategy, on October 1, 2008, Washington
Gas purchased weather derivatives to protect against variations
from normal weather in the District of Columbia. Washington Gas
had weather insurance in fiscal years 2008 and 2007 related to
the District of Columbia, which protected us from
warmer-than-normal
weather but allowed us to retain the benefits of
39
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
colder-than-normal
weather. Both the effects of weather insurance and weather
derivatives are recorded to Operation and maintenance
expenses.
Weather, when measured by HDDs, was 11.6% colder than normal in
fiscal year 2009, 8.7% warmer than normal in fiscal year 2008
and 3.7% colder than normal in fiscal year 2007. Including the
effects of our weather protection strategy, there were no
material effects on net income attributed to colder or warmer
weather on either fiscal year 2009 or 2008. Including the
effects of our weather protection strategy, net income was
enhanced by an estimated $5.4 million (pre-tax) in fiscal
year 2007 in relation to normal weather. Refer to
Results of Operations in Managements
Discussion for Washington Gas for further discussion of the
effects of weather and statistical information for Washington
Gas.
Estimated change in natural gas consumption
patternsCustomer consumption patterns may be affected
by shifts in weather patterns in which customer heating usage
may not correlate highly with average historical levels of usage
per HDD that occur. Natural gas consumption patterns may also be
affected by non-weather related factors. The variance in fiscal
year 2009 net revenues reflects the changes in natural gas
consumption patterns that benefited the comparative period last
year.
Impact of rate casesNew rates went into effect in
Maryland on November 27, 2007. Concurrently, we implemented
new Revenue Normalization Adjustment (RNA) factors that allow
us, in combination with our approved base rates, to recover
anticipated revenues from customers regardless of changes in
weather and customer usage. Individual monthly revenues that we
can collect from our customers under the RNA reflect the pattern
of customer usage during the test year used to set the new base
rates. As results for the year ended September 30, 2008
reflect a combination of customer usage patterns from two
different test years, the RNA contributed incremental revenue
during the fiscal year 2008 as compared to the same period in
fiscal year 2009. The
year-to-year
comparisons for the fiscal year 2008 and 2007 includes the
effects of increased rates to firm customers in all
jurisdictions, as well as interruptible customers in Maryland.
GACRepresents a regulatory mechanism in all
jurisdictions that provides for recovery of uncollectible
accounts expense related to changes in gas costs. Higher
recoveries reflect the timing of GAC rate increases in DC,
partially offset by slightly lower natural gas prices. The
related uncollectible accounts expense is included in operation
and maintenance expenses.
Asset optimizationContributions to net revenues
from our Asset Optimization program remained relatively stable
between 2009 and 2008. The significant increase in 2008 net
revenues attributable to asset optimization compared to 2007
reflects the retention of all storage and transportation
capacity assets for self optimization. We recorded pre-tax
unrealized gains of $4.1 million and unrealized losses of
$(487,000) and $(265,000) for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007 respectively, associated
with our energy-related derivatives. When these derivatives
settle, either financially or by physical delivery, any
unrealized amounts will ultimately be reversed, and Washington
Gas will realize margins when combined with the related
transactions these derivatives economically hedge. Pre-tax
realized gains related to our asset optimization program were
$16.5 million, $15.7 million, and $2.5 million
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, 2008, and
2007, respectively. Partially offsetting these realized margins
were $8.4 million and $2.5 million of unrealized
lower-of-cost
or market adjustments associated with storage capacity assets
utilized for asset optimization for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No
lower-of-cost
or market adjustments occurred in fiscal year 2007. Refer to the
section entitled Market RiskPrice Risk Related to
the Regulated Utility Segment for further discussion
of our asset optimization program.
Storage carrying costsRepresents recoverable
carrying costs based on the cost of capital approved in each
jurisdiction, multiplied by the
12-month
average balance of storage gas inventory. The comparison of
fiscal year 2008 to 2007 reflects higher average storage gas
inventory balances in fiscal year 2008 due to a significant
increase in gas prices during the storage fill season which
generally occurred in the spring and summer of 2008.
Earnings Sharing MechanismThe Virginia ESM, which
was effective on October 1, 2007 enables the sharing of
earnings in Virginia that exceed a target rate of return on
equity with shareholders and customers. The ESM threshold was
exceeded in fiscal year 2008. We recorded $4.8 million of
expense related to the obligation recorded for fiscal year 2008,
resulting in a reduction in 2008 earnings. Fiscal year 2009
earnings were unaffected as regulated results did not exceed the
ESM threshold. In addition, earnings in fiscal year 2009 include
the effects of reducing the amount accrued for in 2008 to
reflect the actual obligation approved by the SCC of VA. Refer
to the section entitled Rates and Regulatory
MattersPerformance- Based Rate Plans included in
Managements Discussion for Washington Gas for a further
discussion of the ESM.
Regulatory adjustmentRepresents an adjustment of
$1.1 million made in fiscal year 2008 applicable to prior
fiscal years as a result of an interpretive change in the
calculation of interruptible revenue sharing in the District of
Columbia.
40
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Reserve for disallowance of natural gas costsIn the
first quarter of 2009, Washington Gas reversed a
$4.6 million reserve for disallowed natural gas costs in
Maryland to income due to a February 5, 2009 Order from the
PSC of MD. This Order resolved a contingency related to a
proposed order issued by a Hearing Examiner of the PSC of MD in
fiscal year 2006. Refer to the section entitled Rates
and Regulatory Matters in Managements Discussion
for Washington Gas for further discussion of this matter.
Operation and Maintenance Expenses. The
following table provides the key factors contributing to the
changes in operation and maintenance expenses of the regulated
utility segment between years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of Changes in Operation and Maintenance
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Weather insurance and derivative benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit)/Loss
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
(4.6
|
)
|
Decrease in premium costs
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Business Process Outsourcing (BPO)
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Labor and incentive plans
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
Uncollectible accounts
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
Weather insurance and derivative benefitsThe
effects of hedging variations from normal weather in the
District of Columbia for fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, and
in Virginia for fiscal year 2007 are recorded to operation and
maintenance expense. During fiscal year 2009, Washington Gas
recorded an expense of $2.9 million (pre-tax) related to
its weather derivatives as a result of
colder-than-normal
weather and incurred a cost of $294,000 for premiums on our
weather related derivatives. During fiscal year 2008, Washington
Gas received a benefit of $4.6 million (pre-tax) from its
weather insurance that resulted from
warmer-than-normal
weather and incurred a cost of $3.4 million for premiums on
our weather related derivatives. During fiscal year 2007, we
received no benefit as weather was colder than normal during
that period. The benefits or losses of the weather-related
instruments are offset by the effect of weather on utility net
revenues.
Business Process OutsourcingThe
year-over-year
comparison of fiscal year 2009 to 2008 reflects a scheduled
increase in the recurring service costs paid to the service
provider and amortization expense related to the regulatory
asset established for initial BPO implementation costs,
partially offset by reduced labor and employee benefits.
Labor and incentive plansThe
year-over-year
comparison of fiscal year 2009 and 2008 reflects the
capitalization of certain incentive benefits that were
previously charged to expense as a result of a regulatory
decision in Virginia. The increase in labor and incentive plans
for
year-over-year
comparison for 2008 and 2007 primarily reflects increases due to
incentive costs related to improved performance.
Employee benefitsThe decrease in employee benefits
expense for both
year-over-year
comparisons reflects a reduction in the costs of post-retirement
benefit plans as well as a higher discount rate assumption used
to measure the benefit obligation.
Uncollectible accountsThe increase for both
year-over-year
comparisons reflects the adjustments to the accumulated reserve
balances made in 2009 and 2008 to address changes in economic
conditions. The reserve in 2009 also reflects an adjustment for
the effect of a customer payment relief program adopted in
Maryland. The increases in fiscal years 2009 and 2008 were
partially offset by the GAC included in utility net revenues.
41
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Depreciation and Amortization. The
following table provides the key factors contributing to the
changes in depreciation and amortization of the regulated
utility segment between years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of Changes in Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
vs. 2008
|
|
|
vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Retroactive depreciation expense adjustment
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
New depreciation ratesDistrict of Columbia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in property, plant & equipment
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
4.3
|
|
|
Retroactive depreciation expense adjustmentIn the
first quarter of fiscal year 2007, we recorded a benefit of
$3.9 million applicable to the prior period from
January 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006 related to a
reduction in Washington Gass depreciation rates on fixed
assets in Virginia.
New depreciation ratesWashington Gas implemented
new depreciation rates in the District of Columbia on
January 1, 2008. Refer to the section entitled
Rates and Regulatory MattersDepreciation
Study for further discussion of depreciation matters.
Other Changes in Expenses. Fiscal year
2009 general taxes increased $5.0 million over 2008 due to
a $1.9 million increase in property taxes and
$3.1 million increase in DC energy taxes associated with
trust funds geared towards implementing energy efficiency and
renewable energy programs. These DC energy taxes are offset by
amounts collected in rates charged to customers. The
year-over-year
increase in general taxes for fiscal year 2008 compared to 2007,
was primarily attributable to property taxes. Income taxes
increased as a result of an increase in operating income,
partially offset by a lower effective tax rate for fiscal year
2008 resulting from an adjustment to our deferred tax balances
during that period.
|
|
|
Non-Utility
Operating Results
|
Our continuing non-utility operations are comprised of two
business segments: (i) retail energy-marketing and
(ii) design-build energy systems. Transactions that
are not significant enough on a stand-alone basis to warrant
treatment as an operating segment, and that do not fit into one
of our three operating segments, are aggregated as Other
Activities and included as part of non-utility operations
for purposes of segment reporting (refer to Note 15 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
Total net income from our non-utility operations for fiscal year
2009 was $14.4 million, an increase of $11.6 million
from fiscal year 2008. This comparison primarily reflects
increased earnings of our retail energy-marketing segment and
design build energy system segment. Total net income from our
continuing non-utility operations for fiscal year 2008 was
$2.8 million, compared to $18.0 million for fiscal
year 2007. This comparison primarily reflects lower earnings
from our retail energy-marketing segment.
42
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Retail
Energy-Marketing
Our retail energy-marketing subsidiary, WGEServices, was
established in 1997, and sells natural gas and electricity on an
unregulated, competitive basis directly to residential,
commercial and industrial customers. The following table depicts
the retail energy-marketing segments operating results
along with selected statistical data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail-Energy Marketing Financial and Statistical Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
vs. 2008
|
|
|
vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Results (In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margins:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
1,192.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,062.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,138.4
|
|
|
$
|
129.3
|
|
|
$
|
(75.7
|
)
|
Less: Cost of energy
|
|
|
1,127.4
|
|
|
|
1,023.3
|
|
|
|
1,071.6
|
|
|
|
104.1
|
|
|
|
(48.3
|
)
|
Revenue taxes
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
Total gross margins
|
|
|
63.5
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
|
|
66.1
|
|
|
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
(27.3
|
)
|
Operation expenses
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
General taxes and other assessmentsother
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
39.6
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
(30.9
|
)
|
Other income (expenses)-net
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
(11.4
|
)
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15.0
|
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
22.4
|
|
|
$
|
10.2
|
|
|
$
|
(17.6
|
)
|
|
Analysis of gross margins (In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized margins
|
|
$
|
45.7
|
|
|
$
|
26.6
|
|
|
$
|
23.1
|
|
|
$
|
19.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
Unrealized
mark-to-market
gains (losses)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
Total gross marginsnatural gas
|
|
|
46.0
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
Electricity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized margins
|
|
$
|
37.3
|
|
|
$
|
24.7
|
|
|
$
|
35.9
|
|
|
$
|
12.6
|
|
|
$
|
(11.2
|
)
|
Unrealized
mark-to-market
gains (losses)
|
|
|
(19.8
|
)
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
(19.3
|
)
|
|
Total gross marginselectricity
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
44.4
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
(30.5
|
)
|
|
Total gross margins
|
|
$
|
63.5
|
|
|
$
|
38.8
|
|
|
$
|
66.1
|
|
|
$
|
24.7
|
|
|
$
|
(27.3
|
)
|
|
Other Retail-Energy Marketing Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Therm sales (millions of therms)
|
|
|
627.4
|
|
|
|
635.0
|
|
|
|
725.5
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(90.5
|
)
|
Number of customers (end of period)
|
|
|
151,500
|
|
|
|
133,300
|
|
|
|
140,700
|
|
|
|
18,200
|
|
|
|
(7,400
|
)
|
Electricity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity sales (millions of kWhs)
|
|
|
5,269.0
|
|
|
|
3,607.6
|
|
|
|
3,943.8
|
|
|
|
1,661.4
|
|
|
|
(336.2
|
)
|
Number of accounts (end of period)
|
|
|
113,000
|
|
|
|
61,800
|
|
|
|
65,900
|
|
|
|
51,200
|
|
|
|
(4,100
|
)
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year
2008. The retail energy-marketing segment
reported net income of $15.0 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $10.2 million
over net income of $4.8 million reported for the prior
fiscal year. This comparison primarily reflects higher gross
margins from the sale of natural gas and electricity. Partially
offsetting these favorable margins are higher operating expenses
related to marketing initiatives designed to take advantage of
unique marketing opportunities that arose during the latter half
of fiscal year 2009.
Gross margins from natural gas sales increased
$21.1 million in fiscal year 2009 over the prior year,
reflecting a $19.1 million increase in realized margins due
to an increase in the margin per therm sold, and a favorable
$2.0 million variance related to unrealized
mark-to-market
gains (losses) associated with energy-related derivatives.
43
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Gross margins from electric sales increased $3.6 million in
fiscal year 2009 over fiscal year 2008, reflecting increased
sales volumes primarily due to a substantial number of customers
added during fiscal year 2009. The increase reflects
$10.5 million in realized margins and a $2.1 million
revision in 2009 to estimated electric costs, partially offset
by $9.0 million for unrealized
mark-to-market
gains (losses) associated with energy-related derivatives.
Unrealized
mark-to-market
gains and losses are primarily attributable to changes in the
fair value of certain contracts related to the purchase of
energy supplies to match future retail sales commitments. These
supply contracts are subject to
mark-to-market
treatment, while many of the corresponding retail sales
commitments are not.
Fiscal Year 2008 vs. Fiscal Year
2007. The retail energy-marketing segment
reported net income of $4.8 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2008, compared to net income of
$22.4 million reported for the prior fiscal year. This
comparison primarily reflects lower gross margins from the sale
of electricity, partially offset by higher gross margins from
the sale of natural gas. Also reflected in the earnings
comparison is an increase in operations expense due to higher
expenses associated with uncollectible accounts and higher labor
and benefit costs.
Gross margins from electric sales decreased in fiscal year 2008,
reflecting a $19.3 million decline in unrealized
mark-to-market valuations and decreased sales volumes.
Unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses are primarily
attributable to changes in the fair value of certain contracts
related to the purchase of energy supplies to match future
retail sales commitments. These supply contracts are subject to
mark-to-market treatment, while the corresponding retail sales
commitments are not. The decreased sales volumes are primarily
due to increased competition and the loss of commercial
customers and lower margins per
kilowatt-hour
sold primarily as a result of unfavorable weather patterns
experienced early in the summer of 2008 and the unusually high
margins experienced in fiscal year 2007.
Gross margins from natural gas sales increased in fiscal year
2008, reflecting a rise in the margin per therm sold, partially
offset by a decrease in natural gas sales volumes. Also
affecting gross margins from natural gas sales was a $275,000
increase in unrealized mark-to-market losses associated with
energy-related derivatives.
Design-Build
Energy Systems
The design-build energy systems segment reported net income of
$3.1 million, $1.8 million, and $0.4 million in
fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. The increases
in annual net income primarily reflect increased profitability,
and growth in the number and size of design-build projects.
Other Non-Utility
Activities
As previously discussed, transactions that are not significant
enough on a stand-alone basis to warrant treatment as an
operating segment, and that do not fit into one of our three
operating segments, are aggregated as Other
Activities and included as part of non-utility operations.
Results for our other non-utility activities reflect net losses
of $3.7 million, $3.8 million, and $4.8 million
for fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. These
comparisons primarily reflect lower general and administrative
expenses.
|
|
|
Other Income
(Expenses)Net
|
Other income (expenses)net reflects income of
$2.2 million, $2.5 million and $3.4 million for
fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These amounts
primarily comprise interest income from short-term investments
that qualify as cash and cash equivalents as well as interest
income associated with certain regulatory items.
Interest expense was $44.9 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2009, compared to $46.8 million
and $48.9 million for fiscal year 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Long-term debt primarily comprises unsecured MTNs
issued solely by Washington Gas.
44
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
The weighted average cost of MTNs was 5.82%, 5.95% and 6.15% at
September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 respectively. The
following table shows the components of the changes in interest
expense between years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of Interest Expense Changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Other (includes
AFUDC(a))
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents Allowance for Funds
Used During Construction. |
For fiscal year 2009 compared to fiscal year 2008, the lower
interest expense related to short-term debt reflects a decrease
in the weighted average cost for these borrowings, partially
offset by an increase in the average balance outstanding. The
higher interest expense associated with long-term debt reflects
an increase of the average balance of long-term debt outstanding
mostly offset by the decrease in the embedded cost of these
borrowings as a result of issuing lower-cost debt. The decrease
in interest expense also reflects a decrease in interest expense
associated with customer deposits, among other items.
For fiscal year 2008 compared to fiscal year 2007, the lower
interest expense related to short-term debt reflects a decrease
in the weighted average cost for these borrowings, partially
offset by an increase in the average balance outstanding. The
lower interest expense associated with long-term debt reflects a
decrease in the embedded cost of these borrowings as a result of
issuing lower-cost debt, mostly offset by a higher average
balance of long-term debt outstanding. The decrease in interest
expense also reflects a decrease in interest expense associated
with customer deposits among other items.
|
|
|
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
|
|
|
|
General
Factors Affecting Liquidity
|
It is important for us to have access to short-term debt markets
to maintain satisfactory liquidity to operate our businesses on
a near-term basis. Acquisition of natural gas, electricity,
pipeline capacity, and the need to finance accounts receivable
and storage gas inventory are our most significant short-term
financing requirements. The need for long-term capital is driven
primarily by capital expenditures and maturities of long-term
debt.
Our ability to obtain adequate and cost effective financing
depends on our credit ratings as well as the liquidity of
financial markets. Our credit ratings depend largely on the
financial performance of our subsidiaries, and a downgrade in
our current credit ratings could require us to post additional
collateral with our wholesale counterparties and adversely
affect our borrowing costs, as well as our access to sources of
liquidity and capital. Also potentially affecting access to
short-term debt capital is the nature of any restrictions that
might be placed upon us, such as ratings triggers or a
requirement to provide creditors with additional credit support
in the event of a determination of insufficient
creditworthiness. Although the credit markets tightened in the
latter half of 2008 and continued into fiscal year 2009, we have
maintained our ability to meet our liquidity needs at reasonable
costs through: (i) the issuance of commercial paper
by WGL Holdings and Washington Gas; (ii) loans made
under the WGL Holdings committed bank credit facility and
(iii) the issuance of debt securities by Washington
Gas to support its operations. In the latter half of fiscal year
2009, the credit markets showed signs of improvements.
The level of our capital expenditure requirements, our financial
performance and the effect of these factors on our credit
ratings, as well as investor demand for our securities, affect
the availability of long-term capital at reasonable costs.
We have a goal to maintain our common equity ratio in the
mid-50% range of total consolidated capital. The level of this
ratio varies during the fiscal year due to the seasonal nature
of our business. This seasonality is also evident in the
variability of our short-term debt balances, which are typically
higher in the fall and winter months and substantially lower in
the spring when a significant portion of our current assets is
converted into cash at the end of the winter heating season.
Accomplishing this capital structure objective and maintaining
sufficient cash flow are necessary to maintain attractive credit
ratings for WGL Holdings and Washington Gas, and to allow access
to capital at reasonable costs. As of September 30, 2009,
total consolidated capitalization, including current maturities
of long-term debt and excluding notes payable, comprised 62.0%
common equity, 1.6% preferred stock and 36.4% long-
45
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
term debt. Our cash flow requirements and our ability to provide
satisfactory resources to meet those requirements are primarily
influenced by the activities of Washington Gas and WGEServices
and, to a lesser extent, other non-utility operations.
Our plans provide for sufficient liquidity to satisfy our
financial obligations. At September 30, 2009, we did not
have any restrictions on our cash balances or retained earnings
that would affect the payment of common or preferred stock
dividends by WGL Holdings or Washington Gas.
|
|
|
Short-Term
Cash Requirements and Related Financing
|
Washington Gass business is weather sensitive and
seasonal, causing short-term cash requirements to vary
significantly during the year. Approximately 77% of the total
therms delivered in Washington Gass service area
(excluding deliveries to two electric generation facilities)
occur during the first and second fiscal quarters. Accordingly,
Washington Gas typically generates more net income in the first
six months of the fiscal year than it does for the entire fiscal
year. During the first six months of our fiscal year, Washington
Gas generates large sales volumes and its cash requirements peak
when accounts receivable and unbilled revenues are at their
highest levels. During the last six months of our fiscal year,
after the winter heating season, Washington Gas will typically
experience a seasonal net loss due to reduced demand for natural
gas. During this period, many of Washington Gass assets
are converted into cash which Washington Gas generally uses to
reduce and sometimes eliminate short-term debt and to acquire
storage gas for the next heating season.
Washington Gas and WGEServices have seasonal short-term cash
requirements resulting from their need to purchase storage gas
inventory in advance of the winter heating periods in which the
storage gas is sold. At September 30, 2009 and 2008
Washington Gas had investment balances in gas storage of
$237.7 million and $406.6 million, respectively with
one additional month, October, remaining in the fill seasons.
Washington Gas collects the cost of gas under cost recovery
mechanisms approved by its regulators. WGEServices collects
revenues that are designed to reimburse its commodity costs used
to supply its retail customer contracts. Variations in the
timing of cash receipts from customers under these collection
methods can significantly affect short-term cash requirements.
In addition, both Washington Gas and WGEServices pay their
respective commodity suppliers before collecting the accounts
receivable balances resulting from these sales. WGEServices
derives its funding to finance these activities from short-term
debt issued by WGL Holdings. Additionally, WGEServices may be
required to post collateral, either parent guarantees from WGL
Holdings or cash, for certain purchases.
Variations in the timing of collections of gas costs under
Washington Gass gas cost recovery mechanisms can
significantly affect short-term cash requirements. Washington
Gas had a $64.7 million and an $11.8 million net
under-collection of gas costs at September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively reflected in current assets/liabilities as
gas costs due from/to customers. The under-collection in both
fiscal years stemmed primarily from an excess of gas costs paid
to suppliers over gas costs recovered from customers during the
most recent twelve month gas cost recovery cycle ended August 31
of each year. Most of this current balance will be returned to,
or collected from, customers in fiscal year 2010. Amounts
under-collected or over-collected that are generated during the
current gas cost recovery cycle are reflected as a regulatory
asset or liability in deferred charges or deferred credits on
the balance sheet until September 1st of each year, at
which time the accumulated amount is transferred to gas costs
due from/to customers as appropriate. At September 30, 2009
and 2008 Washington Gas reflected balances of $14.0 million
and $50.8 million as deferred gas costs in deferred charges.
WGL Holdings and Washington Gas utilize short-term debt in the
form of commercial paper or unsecured short-term bank loans to
fund seasonal cash requirements. Our policy is to maintain
back-up bank
credit facilities in an amount equal to or greater
46
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
than our expected maximum commercial paper position. The
following is a summary of our committed credit agreements at
September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committed Credit Available (In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
WGL Holdings
|
|
|
Washington Gas
|
|
|
|
|
Committed credit agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured revolving credit facility, expires August 3,
2012(a)
|
|
$
|
400.0
|
|
|
$
|
300.0
|
|
|
Total committed credit agreements
|
|
|
400.0
|
|
|
|
300.0
|
|
Less: Commercial Paper
|
|
|
(59.0
|
)
|
|
|
(124.8
|
)
|
|
Net committed credit available
|
|
$
|
341.0
|
|
|
$
|
175.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Both WGL Holdings and Washington
Gas have the right to request extensions with the banks
approval. WGL Holdings revolving credit facility permits
it to borrow an additional $50 million, with the
banks approval, for a total of $450 million.
Washington Gass revolving credit facility permits it to
borrow an additional $100 million, with the banks
approval, for a total of $400 million. |
WGL Holdings typically issues commercial paper to meet its
financing requirements including cash collateral requirements
posted to counterparties associated with WGEServices
contracts (refer to Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information).
At September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, WGL
Holdings and its subsidiaries had outstanding notes payable in
the form of commercial paper
and/or bank
loans from revolving credit facilities of $183.8 million
and $271.0 million, respectively. Of the outstanding notes
payable balance at September 30, 2009, all borrowings were
in the form of commercial paper in the amount of
$59.0 million issued by WGL Holdings and
$124.8 million issued by Washington Gas. At September 30,
2009 there were no outstanding bank loans from WGL
Holdings or Washington Gass revolving credit
facilities. Of the outstanding notes payable balance at
September 30, 2008, $23.0 million and
$231.0 million was commercial paper issued by WGL Holdings
and Washington Gas, respectively. In addition, WGL Holdings had
$17.0 million in outstanding bank loans under its revolving
credit facility and there were no outstanding bank loans from
Washington Gass revolving credit facility.
To manage credit risk, both Washington Gas and WGEServices may
require deposits from certain customers and suppliers, which are
reported as current liabilities in Customer deposits and
advance payments. At September 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008, Customer deposits and advance
payments totaled $52.9 million and
$46.1 million, respectively. For both periods, most of
these deposits related to customer deposits for Washington Gas.
For Washington Gas, deposits from customers may be refunded to
the depositor-customer at various times throughout the year
based on the customers payment habits. At the same time,
other customers make new deposits that cause the balance of
customer deposits to remain relatively steady. There are no
restrictions on Washington Gass use of these customer
deposits. Washington Gas pays interest to its customers on these
deposits in accordance with the requirements of its regulatory
commissions.
For WGEServices, deposits typically represent collateral for
transactions with wholesale counterparties for the purchase and
sale of natural gas and electricity. These deposits may be
required to be repaid or increased at any time based on the
current value of WGEServices net position with the
counterparty. Currently there are no restrictions on
WGEServices use of deposit funds and WGEServices pays
interest to the counterparty on these deposits in accordance
with its contractual obligations. Refer to the section entitled
Credit Risk for a further discussion of our
management of credit risk.
|
|
|
Long-Term Cash
Requirements and Related Financing
|
Our long-term cash requirements primarily depend upon the level
of capital expenditures, long-term debt maturities and decisions
to refinance long-term debt. Our capital expenditures primarily
relate to adding new utility customers and system supply as well
as maintaining the safety and reliability of Washington
Gass distribution system (refer to the section entitled
Capital Expenditures below).
47
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
At September 30, 2009, Washington Gas had the capacity
under a shelf registration to issue up to $450.0 million of
Medium Term Notes (MTNs). Washington Gas has authority from its
regulators to issue other forms of debt, including private
placements. The following describes MTN activity during fiscal
year 2009 and 2008.
Fiscal Year 2009 MTN Activity. In
October 2008, Washington Gas retired $25.0 million of 5.49%
MTNs. On December 5, 2008, Washington Gas issued
$50.0 million of 7.46% fixed rate MTNs due December 5,
2018. Proceeds from this MTN were used by Washington Gas to
replace the matured MTNs and for general corporate purposes,
including funding capital expenditures and working capital
needs, and repaying commercial paper. On July 9, 2009,
Washington Gas retired $50.0 million of 6.92% MTNs. The
maturing MTNs were repaid by the sale of commercial paper.
Washington Gas maintains adequate access to capital markets to
meet its liquidity requirements.
Fiscal Year 2008 MTN Activity. In
August 2008 Washington Gas retired $20.1 million of
maturing MTNs with rates ranging from 6.51% to 6.61%. On
August 26, 2008, Washington Gas issued $50.0 million
of 3.61% floating rate MTNs due August 26, 2010, with a
call option at 100% of par value to redeem the MTNs at any time
on or after February 26, 2009. These MTNs have an interest
rate which is reset quarterly based on the
3-month
London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) plus 80.0 basis points.
Proceeds from these MTNs were used by Washington Gas to retire
the maturing MTNs and for general corporate purposes such as the
funding of capital expenditures, working capital needs and the
retirement of commercial paper.
On November 2, 2009, Washington Gas issued
$50.0 million of unsecured 4.76% fixed rate notes due
November 1, 2019. These notes were issued through a private
placement. Proceeds from these notes were used by Washington Gas
to retire existing indebtedness.
We are exposed to interest-rate risk associated with our debt
financing costs. Washington Gas utilizes derivative instruments
from time to time in order to minimize its exposure to the risk
of interest-rate volatility. Refer to the section entitled
Interest-Rate Risk for a further discussion
of the management of our interest-rate risk.
The table below reflects the current credit ratings for the
outstanding debt instruments of WGL Holdings and Washington Gas.
Changes in credit ratings may affect WGL Holdings and
Washington Gass cost of short-term and long-term debt and
their access to the capital markets. A security rating is not a
recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, it may be
subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning
rating organization and each rating should be evaluated
independently of any other rating. There was no change in the
ratings during the year ended September 30, 2009.
Credit
Ratings for Outstanding Debt Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WGL Holdings
|
|
Washington Gas
|
|
|
Unsecured
|
|
|
|
Unsecured
|
|
|
|
|
Medium-Term Notes
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Medium-Term
|
|
Commercial
|
Rating Service
|
|
(Indicative)(a)
|
|
Paper
|
|
Notes
|
|
Paper
|
|
Fitch Ratings
|
|
A+
|
|
F1
|
|
AA−
|
|
F1+
|
Moodys Investors Service
|
|
Not Rated
|
|
Not Prime
|
|
A2
|
|
P-1
|
Standard & Poors Ratings
Services(b)
|
|
AA−
|
|
A-1
|
|
AA−
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Indicates the ratings that may
be applicable if WGL Holdings were to issue unsecured
MTNs. |
(b) |
|
The long-term debt rating issued
by Standard & Poors Rating Services for WGL
Holdings and Washington Gas is stable. |
|
|
|
Ratings
Triggers and Certain Debt Covenants
|
WGL Holdings and Washington Gas pay fees on their credit
facilities which in some cases are based on the long-term debt
ratings of Washington Gas. In the event the long-term debt of
Washington Gas is downgraded below certain levels, WGL Holdings
and Washington Gas would be required to pay higher fees. There
are five different levels of fees. The credit facility for WGL
Holdings defines its applicable fee level as one level below the
level applicable to Washington Gas. Under the terms of the
credit facilities, the fees based on the long-term debt credit
ratings range from four basis points to nineteen basis points.
48
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Under the terms of WGL Holdings and Washington Gass
credit agreements, the ratio of consolidated financial
indebtedness to consolidated total capitalization cannot exceed
0.65 to 1.0 (65.0%). In addition, WGL Holdings and Washington
Gas are required to inform lenders of changes in corporate
existence, financial conditions, litigation and environmental
warranties that might have a material adverse effect. The
failure to inform the lenders agent of changes in these
areas deemed material in nature might constitute default under
the agreements. Additionally, WGL Holdings or Washington
Gass failure to pay principal or interest when due on any
of its other indebtedness may be deemed a default under our
credit agreements. A default, if not remedied, may lead to a
suspension of further loans
and/or
acceleration in which obligations become immediately due and
payable. At September 30, 2009, we were in compliance with
all of the covenants under our revolving credit facilities.
For certain of Washington Gass natural gas purchase and
pipeline capacity agreements, if the long-term debt of
Washington Gas is downgraded to or below the lower of a BBB-
rating by Standard & Poors Ratings Services or a
Baa3 rating by Moodys Investors Service, or if Washington
Gas is deemed by a counterparty not to be creditworthy, then the
counterparty may withhold service or deliveries, or may require
additional credit support. For certain other agreements, if the
counterpartys credit exposure to Washington Gas exceeds a
contractually defined threshold amount, or if Washington
Gass credit rating declines, then the counterparty may
require additional credit support. At September 30, 2009,
Washington Gas would not be required to supply additional credit
support by these arrangements if its long-term debt rating were
to be downgraded one rating level.
WGL Holdings has guaranteed payments for certain purchases of
natural gas and electricity on behalf of its wholly-owned
subsidiary, WGEServices (refer to Contractual
Obligations, Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Other Commercial
Commitments for a further discussion of these
guarantees). If the credit rating of WGL Holdings declines,
WGEServices may be required to provide additional credit support
for these purchase contracts. At September 30, 2009,
WGEServices would be required to provide $7.8 million in
additional credit support for these arrangements if the
long-term debt rating of WGL Holdings were to be downgraded one
rating level.
|
|
|
Cash Flows
Provided by Operating Activities
|
The primary drivers for our operating cash flows are cash
payments received from natural gas and electricity customers,
offset by our payments for natural gas and electricity costs,
operation and maintenance expenses, taxes and interest costs.
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled
$307.1 million, $62.0 million and $213.3 million
for fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net cash
provided by operating activities reflects net income applicable
to common stock, as adjusted for non-cash earnings and charges,
as well as changes in working capital. Certain changes in
working capital from September 30, 2008 to
September 30, 2009 are described below.
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and unbilled revenues increased
$30.6 million from September 30, 2008 primarily due to
increased sales volumes associated with Washington Gass
asset optimization program.
|
|
|
|
Storage gas inventory cost levels decreased $168.9 million
from September 30, 2008 primarily due to lower gas prices
of volumes in storage.
|
|
|
|
Gas costs and other regulatory assets increased
$48.0 million from September 30, 2008 due to an
increase in under-collection of gas costs during the year and an
increase in unbilled gas costs.
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities decreased
$34.5 million, largely attributable to a decrease in the
cost of the natural gas purchased.
|
|
|
|
Other prepayments increased $52.5 million from
September 30, 2008 due to an increase in collateral
receivables for transactions with wholesale counterparties for
the purchase of energy for our retail-energy marketing segment.
This increase in collateral reflects lower market prices for
energy, compared to the contracted purchase price of energy
supplies.
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities decreased $24.7 million primarily
due to unrealized fair value gains associated with
energy-related derivatives for both Washington Gas and
WGEServices.
|
|
|
|
Deferred purchased gas costsnet decreased
$36.8 million primarily due to a decrease in the
under-collection of gas costs from September 30, 2008.
|
49
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
|
|
|
Cash Flows
Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities totaled
$(166.5) million, $74.3 million and
$(47.2) million for fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. During fiscal year 2009, we decreased our notes
payable by a net amount of $87.1 million due to decreased
working capital requirements driven principally by lower storage
gas inventory costs, a dividend payment on common stock totaling
$72.4 million, partially offset by $5.1 million in
cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock pursuant to our
stock-based compensation plan. Additionally during fiscal year
2009, we retired $75.0 million of MTNs and issued
$50.0 million of lower-cost MTNs (refer to the section
entitled Long-Term Cash Requirements and Related
Financing).
During fiscal year 2008, we increased our notes payable by a net
amount of $86.7 million due to increased working capital
requirements, principally to fund higher storage gas inventory
costs at Washington Gas. This increase in notes payable was
partially offset by dividend payments on common stock totaling
$69.1 million, as well as $14.1 million in cash
proceeds from the issuance of common stock pursuant to our
stock-based compensation plan. Additionally during fiscal year
2008, we retired $20.1 million of MTNs and issued
$50.0 million of lower-cost MTNs.
Cash flows used in financing activities for fiscal year 2007 was
driven by our dividend payments on common stock totaling
$66.8 million, partially offset by $11.7 million in
cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock pursuant to our
stock-based compensation plan.
The following table reflects the issuances and retirements of
long-term debt that occurred during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and
2007 (also refer to Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
Medium-term notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued(a)
|
|
|
7.46
|
%
|
|
$
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
3.61
|
%
|
|
$
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Retired
|
|
|
5.49 6.92
|
%
|
|
|
(75.0
|
)
|
|
|
6.51 6.61
|
%
|
|
|
(20.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued(b)
|
|
|
5.95 6.98
|
%
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
5.63
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Retired(c)
|
|
|
4.76 7.53
|
%
|
|
|
(25.5
|
)
|
|
|
4.76 9.00
|
%
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
4.76 9.00
|
%
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
Other activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(35.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Interest rate resets quarterly
on November, February, May, and August 26 of each year until
maturity. |
(b) |
|
Includes the non-cash issuances
of project debt financing of $1.4 million,
$13.3 million, and $14.9 million for fiscal years
2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. |
(c) |
|
Includes the non-cash
extinguishments of project debt financing of $24.5 million
for fiscal year 2009. |
|
|
|
Cash Flows
Used in Investing Activities
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities totaled
$138.9 million, $135.0 million and $165.6 million
during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In fiscal
years 2009, 2008 and 2007, $134.2 million,
$133.6 million and $162.0 million, respectively, of
cash was utilized for capital expenditures made on behalf of
Washington Gas.
50
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
The following table depicts our actual capital expenditures for
fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, and projected capital
expenditures for fiscal years 2010 through 2014. Our capital
expenditure program includes investments to extend service to
new areas, and to ensure safe, reliable and improved service.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
New business
|
|
$
|
44.9
|
|
|
$
|
45.8
|
|
|
$
|
28.8
|
|
|
$
|
48.2
|
|
|
$
|
51.4
|
|
|
$
|
55.4
|
|
|
$
|
62.5
|
|
|
$
|
67.7
|
|
|
$
|
285.2
|
|
Replacements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rehabilitation project
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
33.8
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
|
57.4
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
41.6
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
43.2
|
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
|
|
213.8
|
|
LNG storage facility
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
56.9
|
|
|
|
48.7
|
|
|
|
35.8
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
150.7
|
|
SOC redevelopment project
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78.3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
48.3
|
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
|
|
51.2
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
36.9
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
168.3
|
|
|
Total-accrual
basis(a)
|
|
$
|
158.1
|
|
|
$
|
131.4
|
|
|
$
|
137.5
|
|
|
$
|
162.5
|
|
|
$
|
220.9
|
|
|
$
|
202.2
|
|
|
$
|
174.8
|
|
|
$
|
135.9
|
|
|
$
|
896.3
|
|
Cash basis adjustments
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total-cash basis
|
|
$
|
164.5
|
|
|
$
|
135.0
|
|
|
$
|
138.9
|
|
|
$
|
162.5
|
|
|
$
|
220.9
|
|
|
$
|
202.2
|
|
|
$
|
174.8
|
|
|
$
|
135.9
|
|
|
$
|
896.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes Allowance for Funds
Used During Construction and prepayments associated with capital
projects. Includes accruals for capital expenditures and other
non-cash additions. |
The 2010 to 2014 projected periods include $285.2 million
for continued growth to serve new customers, and
$213.8 million primarily related to the replacement and
betterment of existing capacity. Additionally, the projected
period contains capital expenditures to construct a necessary,
new source of peak day capacity within the boundaries of the
natural gas distribution system to support customer growth and
pressure requirements on the entire natural gas distribution
system. Specifically, these estimated expenditures are expected
to be used for the construction of a one billion cubic foot LNG
storage facility on the land historically used for storage
facilities by Washington Gas in Chillum, Maryland (refer to the
section entitled Chillum LNG Facility). Projected
expenditures also reflect $78.3 million for the development
of new facilities at the Springfield Operations Center (SOC) and
$168.3 million of other expenditures, which include general
plant.
|
|
|
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS, OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND OTHER COMMERCIAL
COMMITMENTS
|
WGL Holdings and Washington Gas have certain contractual
obligations that extend beyond fiscal year 2009. These
commitments include long-term debt, lease obligations and
unconditional purchase obligations for pipeline capacity,
transportation and storage services, and certain natural gas and
electricity commodity commitments. The estimated obligations as
of September 30, 2009 for future fiscal years are shown
below.
51
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Contractual Obligations and Commercial
Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline and storage
contracts(a)
|
|
$
|
2,402.7
|
|
|
$
|
162.1
|
|
|
$
|
159.8
|
|
|
$
|
159.7
|
|
|
$
|
161.8
|
|
|
$
|
183.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,575.7
|
|
Medium-term
notes(b)
|
|
|
639.0
|
|
|
|
82.5
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
|
77.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.0
|
|
|
|
382.5
|
|
Other long-term
debt(b)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense(c)
|
|
|
415.7
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
32.7
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
264.2
|
|
Gas purchase commitmentsWashington
Gas(d)
|
|
|
497.9
|
|
|
|
113.6
|
|
|
|
40.7
|
|
|
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
55.2
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
|
|
177.4
|
|
Gas purchase
commitmentsWGEServices(e)
|
|
|
536.8
|
|
|
|
306.4
|
|
|
|
152.5
|
|
|
|
69.8
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric purchase
commitments(f)
|
|
|
885.8
|
|
|
|
474.7
|
|
|
|
273.0
|
|
|
|
116.3
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
36.7
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
Business Process
Outsourcing(g)
|
|
|
259.5
|
|
|
|
40.8
|
|
|
|
34.8
|
|
|
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
30.5
|
|
|
|
88.7
|
|
Other long-term
commitments(h)
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,684.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,225.8
|
|
|
$
|
731.9
|
|
|
$
|
546.1
|
|
|
$
|
309.2
|
|
|
$
|
367.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,504.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents minimum payments
under natural gas transportation, storage and peaking contracts
which have expiration dates through fiscal year 2029.
Additionally, includes minimum payments for WGEServices pipeline
contracts. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Represents scheduled repayment
of principal including the assumed exercise of a put option by
the debt holders of $8.5 million in 2010. Excludes
$5.1 million in debt that is anticipated to be a non-cash
extinguishment of project debt financing (refer to the section
entitled Construction Project Financing). |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Represents the scheduled
interest payments associated with MTNs and other long-term
debt. |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Includes short-term commitments
to purchase fixed volumes of natural gas, as well as long-term
gas purchase commitments that contain fixed volume purchase
requirements. Cost estimates are based on both forward market
prices and option premiums for fixed volume purchases under
these purchase commitments. |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
Represents commitments based on
a combination of market prices at September 30, 2009 and
fixed price as well as index priced contract commitments for
natural gas delivered to various city gate stations, including
the cost of transportation to that point, which is bundled in
the purchase price. |
|
(f) |
|
Represents electric purchase
commitments which are based on existing fixed price and fixed
volume contracts. Also includes $6.5 million related to
renewable energy credits. |
|
(g) |
|
Represents fixed costs to the
service provider related to the
10-year
contract for business process outsourcing. These payments do not
reflect potential inflationary adjustments included in the
contract. Including these inflationary adjustments, required
payments to the service provider could total
$306.5 million. |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
Includes certain information
technology service contracts and committed payments related to
certain environmental response costs. |
The table above reflects fixed and variable obligations. Certain
of these estimates reflect likely purchases under various
contracts, and may differ from minimum future contractual
commitments disclosed in Note 13 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
For commitments related to Washington Gass pension and
post-retirement benefit plans, during fiscal year 2010,
Washington Gas does not expect to make any contributions to its
qualified, trusteed, employee-non-contributory defined benefit
pension plan covering all active and vested former employees of
Washington Gas. Washington Gas expects to make payments totaling
$10.2 million in fiscal year 2010 on behalf of participants
in our non-funded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.
Washington Gas also expects to contribute $19.0 million to
our health and life insurance benefit plans on behalf of
retirees during fiscal year 2010. For a further discussion of
our pension and post-retirement benefit plans, refer to
Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
Construction
Project Financing
|
To fund certain of its construction projects, Washington Gas
enters into financing arrangements with third party lenders. As
part of these financing arrangements, Washington Gass
customers agree to make principal and interest payments over a
period of time, typically beginning after the projects are
completed. Washington Gas assigns these customer payment streams
to the lender. As the lender funds the construction project,
Washington Gas establishes a note receivable representing its
customers obligations to remit principal and interest and
a long-term note payable to the lender. When these projects are
formally accepted by the customer as completed,
Washington Gas transfers the ownership of the note receivable to
the lender and removes both the note receivable and the
long-term financing from its financial statements. As of
September 30, 2009, work on these construction projects
that was not completed or accepted by customers was valued at
$5.1 million, which is recorded on the balance sheet as a
note receivable in
52
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Deferred Charges and Other AssetsOther with
the corresponding long-term obligation to the lender in
Long-term debt. At any time before these contracts
are accepted by the customer, should there be a contract
default, such as, among other things, a delay in completing the
project, the lender may call on Washington Gas to fund the
unpaid principal in exchange for which Washington Gas would
receive the right to the stream of payments from the customer.
Once the project is accepted by the customer, the lender will
have no recourse against Washington Gas related to this
long-term debt.
WGL Holdings has guaranteed payments primarily for certain
purchases of natural gas and electricity on behalf of the retail
energy-marketing segment. At September 30, 2009, these
guarantees totaled $539.5 million. The amount of such
guarantees is periodically adjusted to reflect changes in the
level of financial exposure related to these purchase
commitments. We also receive financial guarantees or other
collateral from suppliers when required by our credit policy
(refer to the section entitled Credit Risk
for a further discussion of our credit policy). WGL Holdings
also issued guarantees totaling $3.0 million at
September 30, 2009 that were made on behalf of certain of
our non-utility subsidiaries associated with their banking
transactions. For all of its financial guarantees, WGL Holdings
may cancel any or all future obligations imposed by the
guarantees upon written notice to the counterparty, but WGL
Holdings would continue to be responsible for the obligations
that had been created under the guarantees prior to the
effective date of the cancellation.
Washington Gas plans to construct a one billion cubic foot LNG
storage facility on the land historically used for natural gas
storage facilities by Washington Gas in Chillum, Maryland, to
meet its customers forecasted peak demand for natural gas.
The new storage facility is currently expected to be completed
and in service by the
2013-2014
winter heating season at an estimated cost of $159 million,
subject to certain zoning and other legal challenges.
On October 30, 2006, the District Council of Prince
Georges County, Maryland denied Washington Gass
application for a special exception related to its proposed
construction of the LNG peaking plant because it believes that
current zoning restrictions prohibit such construction.
Washington Gas appealed this decision to the Prince
Georges County Circuit Court (the Circuit Court) on
November 22, 2006; however, the case was subsequently sent
back to the administrative process by the Circuit Court. On
April 16, 2008, Washington Gas filed a Complaint for
Declaratory and Injunctive Relief with the United States
District Court for the District of Maryland (the
U.S. District Court) seeking to clarify the role of the
local jurisdiction by affirming all local laws relating to
safety and location of the facility are preempted by Federal and
State law. A ruling by the U.S. District Court is pending.
On March 19, 2009, the PSC of MD ordered that evidentiary
proceedings be opened for the purpose of reviewing Washington
Gass most recent gas procurement plan including the role
the Chillum facility plays in meeting current and future
customers annual and seasonal natural gas requirements.
The Company revised its projected service date for the facility
in a public notice made on August 7, 2009. The Company has
requested that the proceeding be held in abeyance until the
Companys next gas procurement plan is filed in November,
2009. Refer to the section entitled Rates and
Regulatory MattersMaryland JurisdictionReview of the
Companys
2009-2013
Gas Portfolio Plan for a further discussion of this
issue. Washington Gas must begin construction of the storage
facility in the summer of 2010 in order for the Chillum Facility
to be completed and in service by the
2013-2014
winter heating season. Until the legal challenges are resolved
and the LNG plant is constructed, Washington Gas has planned for
alternative sources of supply to meet its customers peak
day requirements. These plans include capital expenditures
related to infrastructure improvements which contribute to
providing for adequate system performance based on projected
needs.
|
|
|
Operating
Issues Related To Cove Point Natural Gas Supply
|
In late fiscal year 2003, Dominion reactivated its Cove Point
LNG terminal. A large portion of the gas delivered from the Cove
Point LNG terminal comes to the Washington Gas service territory
as a result of the Companys multiple delivery points on
the Cove Point pipeline and from three interstate natural gas
transmission pipelines also interconnected with the Cove Point
pipeline, each of which serve Washington Gas from delivery
points downstream of its Cove Point pipeline interconnect. The
composition of the vaporized LNG received from the Cove Point
LNG terminal resulted in increased leaks in mechanical couplings
on the portion of our distribution system in Prince
Georges County, Maryland that directly receives the Cove
Point gas. The vaporized Cove Point gas contains a lower
concentration of heavy hydrocarbons (HHCs) than non-liquefied
natural gas, and caused the seals on those mechanical couplings
to shrink and to leak. Independent laboratory tests performed on
behalf of Washington Gas have shown that, in
53
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
a laboratory environment, the injection of HHCs into the type of
gas coming from the Cove Point LNG terminal can be effective in
re-swelling the seals in couplings which increases their sealing
force and in turn, reduces the propensity for the affected
couplings to leak.
Through a pipeline replacement project and the construction of a
HHC injection facility at the largest gate station that
exclusively receives gas from the Cove Point terminal,
Washington Gas has reduced the occurrence of new coupling leaks
in this area of the distribution system. A recent expansion of
the physical capacity of the Cove Point terminal could result in
a substantial increase in the receipt of Cove Point gas into
additional portions of Washington Gass distribution system
as greater volumes of Cove Point gas are introduced into other
downstream pipelines that provide service to Washington Gas.
Based upon engineering and flow studies and our experience, this
increase in the receipt of Cove Point gas is likely to result in
a significantly greater number of leaks in other parts of
Washington Gass distribution system, unless our efforts to
mitigate these additional leaks are successful. Washington Gas
is attempting to mitigate this anticipated increase in leaks
through: (i) pipeline replacement programs; (ii)
the operation of three HHC injection facilities; (iii)
isolating its interstate pipeline receipt points and limiting
the amount of gas received, where possible, from pipelines that
transport Cove Point gas; (iv) blending, where possible,
the Cove Point gas with other supplies of natural gas from
within the continental United States and (v) continued
efforts before the FERC to condition incremental increases in
deliveries from the Cove Point terminal on the appropriate
resolution of safety concerns consistent with the public
interest.
Washington Gas installed and operates HHC injection facilities
at three gate stations. Assuming current gas flow patterns with
the current pipeline supply configurations, the strategic
placement of the three operational HHC injection facilities will
inject HHCs into the natural gas supplied to over 95% of the
pipelines that contain mechanical couplings within our
distribution system. Washington Gas has been granted recovery
for a portion of these costs allocable to Virginia and Maryland.
Additionally, Washington Gas will seek recovery of the costs of
these facilities allocable to the District of Columbia in a
future base rate proceeding. Washington Gas expects the cost of
these facilities to be recoverable in all jurisdictions.
The estimated cost of these facilities does not include the cost
of the HHCs injected into the gas stream at the gate stations.
We have been granted cost recovery for the majority of these
costs in Virginia and Maryland. On October 2, 2009,
Washington Gas and the District of Columbia Office of the
Peoples Counsel (DC OPC) filed a Joint Motion for Approval
of Unanimous Agreement of Stipulation and Full Settlement with
the PSC of DC which, if approved, will provide for full recovery
of the HHC commodity costs in the District of Columbia (refer to
the section entitled Rates and Regulatory Matters).
Washington Gas is replacing or remediating selected mechanically
coupled pipelines within the areas of the distribution system
that may receive high concentrations of Cove Point gas, but that
will not receive HHC injections. Washington Gas has also planned
for additional replacement of mechanically coupled pipeline in
other areas of its distribution system. In total, the current
estimated cost of planned mechanical coupling remediation and
replacement work over the next three years is $39.7 million
which includes $9.0 million as part of a planned
mechanically coupled pipe replacement program approved by the
Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC of VA) as part of a
settlement of a Virginia rate case. The October 2, 2009
settlement filed in the District of Columbia includes a targeted
mechanically coupled pipe replacement and encapsulation program
which will cost no more than $28.0 million and is expected
to take approximately seven years to complete. Rate recovery of
the expenditures is provided for in the settlement.
Washington Gas continues to gather and evaluate field and
laboratory evidence to determine the efficacy of HHC injections
of the Cove Point gas in preventing additional leaks or impeding
the rate at which additional leaks may occur in the gas
distribution system if expanded volumes from the Cove Point
terminal are introduced. In a report filed with the PSC of MD on
June 30, 2008, Washington Gas reported a notable increase
in leaks in mechanical couplings in a portion of its
distribution system in Virginia where Cove Point gas injected
with HHCs was recently introduced for a short period of time.
Although this increase in leaks was significantly less than the
increase experienced in the affected area of Prince
Georges County, Maryland, the injection of HHCs into the
Cove Point gas did not reduce the occurrence of coupling leaks
to an acceptable level that would allow Washington Gas to safely
accommodate the increased deliveries of revaporized LNG
anticipated with the expansion of the Cove Point terminal. If we
are unable to implement a satisfactory solution on a timely
basis, additional operating expenses and capital expenditures
may be necessary to contend with leaks that may accompany the
receipt of increased volumes of vaporized LNG from the Cove
Point terminal into Washington Gass distribution system.
Such additional operating expenses and capital expenditures may
not be timely enough to mitigate the challenges posed by
increased volumes of Cove Point gas, potentially resulting in
leakage from mechanical couplings at a rate that could
compromise the safety of our distribution system. Additional
legal or regulatory remedies may be necessary to protect
54
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
the Washington Gas distribution system and its customers from
the adverse effects of unblended vaporized LNG (refer to the
section entitled Request for FERC Action below for a
further discussion).
Notwithstanding Washington Gass recovery through local
regulatory commission action of costs related to the
construction of the injection facilities and HHC commodity
costs, Washington Gas is pursuing remedies to keep its customers
from having to pay more than their appropriate share of the
costs of the remediation to maintain the safety of the
Washington Gas distribution system.
Request for FERC
Action Regarding Cove Point
In November 2005, Washington Gas requested the FERC to invoke
its authority to require Dominion to demonstrate that the
increased volumes of the Cove Point gas resulting from the
expansion would flow safely through the Washington Gas
distribution system and would be consistent with the public
interest. Washington Gas specifically requested that the
proposed expansion of the Cove Point LNG terminal be denied
until Dominion has shown that the Cove Point gas:
(i) is of such quality that it is fully
interchangeable with the domestically produced natural gas
historically received by Washington Gas and
(ii) will not cause harm to its customers or to the
infrastructure of Washington Gass distribution system.
On June 16, 2006, the FERC issued an order authorizing
Dominions request to expand the capacity and output of its
Cove Point LNG terminal and, thereby, denying Washington
Gass request to require Dominion to demonstrate the safety
of the Cove Point gas flowing through the Washington Gas
distribution system. Washington Gas, the PSC of MD, Keyspan
Corporation, the Maryland Office of Peoples Counsel (MD
OPC) and other organizations all filed Requests for Rehearing
with the FERC to seek modification of the FERCs
June 16, 2006 order. These requests were all rejected by
the FERC. On January 26, 2007, Washington Gas filed a
notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit (the Court of Appeals). Washington
Gas requested the Court of Appeals to reverse the June 16,
2006 FERC order that authorized the Cove Point expansion, as
well as a January 4, 2007 FERC order that denied Washington
Gass rehearing request.
On July 18, 2008, the Court of Appeals issued an opinion
vacating the FERC orders to the extent they approve the
expansion. The opinion remanded the case to the FERC to address
whether the expansion can go forward without causing unsafe
leakage on Washington Gas Light Companys distribution
system.
Although Washington Gas agrees with the portion of the Court of
Appeals decision that states the FERC failed to address
adequately the future safety concerns associated with increased
deliveries of LNG into its system, Washington Gas does not agree
with all of the findings of the Court of Appeals, including
conclusions related to the cause of the leaks, and on
September 2, 2008 filed a request for rehearing with the
Court of Appeals. This request has been denied. The FERC held a
technical conference on August 14, 2008 to discuss
the nature and progress of remedial measures taken to date, as
well as the need and benefit of any other remedial measures that
might be taken by WGL and Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP so that
WGLs system can safely accommodate the increased amounts
of regasified LNG from Cove Points LNG terminal.
Washington Gas filed initial Post Technical Conference Comments
on August 19, 2008 and reply Post Technical Conference
Comments on August 22, 2008. On October 7, 2008, the
FERC issued its reauthorization of the expansion of the Cove
Point terminal, allowing construction to continue; however, the
FERC limited the amount of vaporized LNG that may flow from the
Cove Point terminal into the Columbia Gas Transmission pipeline
and ultimately into the distribution system of Washington Gas.
On November 6, 2008, Washington Gas filed a Request for
Rehearing with the FERC, citing numerous factual and legal
errors in the October 7, 2008 reauthorization. The
reauthorization fails to adequately address future safety
concerns as directed by the Court of Appeals. Although this
reauthorization limited the amount of vaporized LNG that may
flow from the Cove Point terminal into Washington Gass
distribution system through the Columbia Gas Transmission
pipeline, this limited amount far exceeds any amount of Cove
Point gas that has been received by Columbia Gas Transmission to
date. On January 15, 2009, the FERC issued an order denying
Washington Gass request for rehearing and affirmed its
reauthorization of the expansion of the Cove Point terminal. On
February 13, 2009, Washington Gas filed a request with the
FERC for an emergency stay of the effectiveness of the orders
the FERC issued on October 7, 2008 and January 15,
2009. On March 19, 2009, the FERC denied Washington
Gass request for a stay. On March 13, 2009,
Washington Gas filed a Petition for Review in the Court of
Appeals of the FERCs Order on Remand issued on
October 7, 2008, and its Order on Rehearing of the
October 7, 2008 Order, issued January 15, 2009, that
established a cap on the volume of LNG that could be delivered
to the Columbia Gas interconnection with the Cove Point
pipeline. The October 2008 decision did not fully address the
concerns raised earlier by the Court of Appealsthat the
Cove Point expansion should not proceed until FERC addressed the
safety concerns raised by Washington Gas. On July 20, 2009
the Court of Appeals issued an Order setting a briefing schedule
with final briefs due on January 27, 2010. The date for
oral argument has not been set.
55
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Washington Gas is committed to maintaining the safety of its
distribution system for its customers and will continue to
oppose the authorization of the Cove Point expansion until a
long-term solution is determined that can address the safety
issues associated with the expanded flows of vaporized LNG from
the Cove Point terminal that flow into the interstate pipeline
system that also serves Washington Gas.
|
|
|
Additional LNG
Supply from the Elba Island Expansion
|
On September 20, 2007, the FERC approved the expansion of
the existing Elba Island LNG receiving terminal near Savannah,
Georgia owned by Southern LNG, Inc. (Southern LNG). Concurrent
with this approval, the FERC granted Southern LNG certificate
authority to construct and operate a new interstate natural gas
pipeline to transport regasified LNG from the Elba Island
facility to Georgia and South Carolina. On March 31, 2009,
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (Transco) filed with
FERC for authority to construct and operate interconnections in
Georgia and South Carolina between the Elba Island pipeline and
the Transco pipeline. This expansion and the requested
interconnections, expected to be completed in 2010, may result
in the receipt of gas from the Elba Island facility into
portions of Washington Gass distribution system. The gas
from the Elba Island facility is expected to contain a lower
concentration of HHCs than domestically produced natural gas,
and may result in increased leaks in Washington Gass
distribution system. Washington Gas is currently evaluating the
potential effect of the introduction of Elba Island gas into our
distribution system, and is evaluating potential preventative
and remedial measures to mitigate any possible increase in leaks
in the effected portions of Washington Gass distribution
system that may receive Elba Island gas. Washington Gas has
filed with FERC to challenge Transcos interconnection
request and has conditioned our support of such interconnection
on Transco maintaining minimum HHC levels in the blended gas
that would be delivered into the Washington Gas system. On
September 17, 2009, the FERC issued an Order granting
Transcos request for authorization to construct the
interconnections between the Elba Island facility and the
Transco pipeline. The FERC stated that Washington Gas had not
raised any new evidence to support claims of damage to the
distribution system and that the Cove Point orders had addressed
the same issues. FERC also found it was unreasonable to impose
restrictions on a long distance pipeline to accommodate the
Washington Gas system. On October 19, 2009, Washington Gas
filed a rehearing request of the FERC Order with the FERC.
Washington Gas welcomes the opportunity to work with Dominion as
well as the shippers who bring LNG into the Cove Point terminal
and the interstate pipelines that deliver gas to Washington Gas
in order to achieve and implement an appropriate solution to the
issue of gas quality affecting its distribution system.
Certain wholesale suppliers that sell natural gas to both
Washington Gas and WGEServices either have relatively low credit
ratings or are not rated by major credit rating agencies.
Washington Gas enters into transactions with wholesale
counterparties for the purpose of meeting firm ratepayer
commitments, to optimize the value of its long-term capacity
assets, and for hedging natural gas costs. In the event of a
suppliers failure to deliver contracted volumes of gas or
fulfill its payment obligations, Washington Gas may incur losses
that would typically be passed through to its sales customers
under the purchased gas cost adjustment mechanisms. Washington
Gas may be at risk for financial loss to the extent these losses
are not passed through to its customers. To manage these various
credit risks, Washington Gas has a credit policy in place that
is designed to mitigate these credit risks through a requirement
for credit enhancements including, but not limited to, letters
of credit, parent guarantees and cash collateral when deemed
necessary. In accordance with this policy, Washington Gas has
obtained credit enhancements from certain of its counterparties.
Additionally, for certain counterparties or their guarantors
that meet this policys credit worthiness criteria,
Washington Gas grants unsecured credit which is continuously
monitored.
For WGEServices, depending on the ability of wholesale
counterparties to deliver natural gas or electricity under
existing contracts, WGEServices could be financially exposed for
the difference between the price at which WGEServices has
contracted to buy these commodities and their replacement cost
from another supplier. To the extent that WGEServices sells
natural gas to these wholesale counterparties, WGEServices may
be exposed to payment risk if WGEServices is in a net receivable
position. Additionally, WGEServices enters into contracts with
third parties to hedge the costs of natural gas and electricity.
Depending on the ability of the third parties to fulfill their
commitments, WGEServices could be at risk for financial loss.
WGEServices has an existing credit policy that is designed to
mitigate credit risks through a requirement for credit
enhancements including, but not limited to, letters of credit,
56
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
parent guarantees and cash collateral when deemed necessary. In
accordance with this policy, WGEServices has obtained credit
enhancements from certain of its counterparties. If certain
counterparties or their guarantors meet the policys credit
worthiness criteria, WGEServices grants unsecured credit to
those counterparties or their guarantors. The credit worthiness
of all counterparties is continuously monitored.
WGEServices is also subject to the credit policy requirements of
their counterparties which under certain circumstances require
similar credit enhancements from WGEServices under these
contracts. WGEServices credit risks may extend beyond the price
or payment risk outlined above to the extent that cash
collateral has been provided to the counterparty. At
September 30, 2009, WGEServices had provided
$39.7 million in cash collateral to supplier counterparties.
The following table provides information on our credit exposure,
net of collateral, to wholesale counterparties as of
September 30, 2009 for both Washington Gas and WGEServices,
separately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Exposure to Wholesale Counterparties (In
millions )
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure
|
|
|
Offsetting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Net Exposure of
|
|
|
|
Before Credit
|
|
|
Credit Collateral
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Counterparties
|
|
|
Counterparties
|
|
Rating(a)
|
|
Collateral(b)
|
|
|
Held(c)
|
|
|
Exposure
|
|
|
Greater Than
10%(d)
|
|
|
Greater Than 10%
|
|
|
|
|
Washington Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Grade
|
|
$
|
17.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
12.1
|
|
Non-Investment Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No External Ratings
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WGEServices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Grade
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
Non-Investment Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No External Ratings
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included in Investment
Grade are counterparties with a minimum
Standard & Poors or Moodys Investor
Service rating of BBB- or Baa3, respectively. If a counterparty
has provided a guarantee by a higher-rated entity (e.g., its
parent), the guarantors rating is used in this
table. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes the net of all open
positions on energy-related derivatives subject to
mark-to-market
accounting requirements, the net receivable/payable for realized
transactions and net open positions for contracts designated as
normal purchases and normal sales and not recorded on our
balance sheet. Amounts due from counterparties are offset by
liabilities payable to those counterparties to the extent that
legally enforceable netting arrangements are in place. |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Represents cash deposits and
letters of credit received from counterparties, not adjusted for
probability of default. |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Using a percentage of the net
exposure. |
Washington Gas is exposed to the risk of non-payment of utility
bills by certain of its customers. To manage this customer
credit risk, Washington Gas may require cash deposits from its
high risk customers to cover payment of their bills until the
requirements for the deposit refunds are met.
WGEServices is also exposed to the risk of non-payment of
invoiced sales by its retail customers. WGEServices manages this
risk by evaluating the credit quality of new customers as well
as by monitoring collections from existing customers. To the
extent necessary, WGEServices can obtain collateral from, or
terminate service to, its existing customers based on credit
quality criteria.
We are exposed to various forms of market risk including
commodity price risk, weather risk and interest-rate risk. The
following discussion describes these risks and our management of
them.
|
|
|
Price Risk
Related to the Regulated Utility Segment
|
Washington Gas faces price risk associated with the purchase of
natural gas. Washington Gas generally recovers the cost of the
natural gas to serve customers through gas cost recovery
mechanisms as approved in jurisdictional tariffs; therefore a
change in the
57
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
price of natural gas generally has no direct effect on
Washington Gass net income. However, Washington Gas is
responsible for following competitive and reasonable practices
in purchasing natural gas for its customers.
To manage price risk associated with its natural gas supply to
its firm customers, Washington Gas: (i) actively
manages its gas supply portfolio to balance sales and delivery
obligations; (ii) injects natural gas into storage
during the summer months when prices are historically lower, and
withdraws that gas during the winter heating season when prices
are historically higher and (iii) enters into
hedging contracts and other contracts that qualify as derivative
instruments related to the sale and purchase of natural gas.
Washington Gas has specific regulatory approval in the District
of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia to use forward contracts and,
except in Maryland, option contracts to hedge against potential
price volatility for a limited portion of its natural gas
purchases for firm customers. Specifically, Washington Gas has
approval to: (i) buy gas in advance using forward
contracts; (ii) purchase call options that lock in
a maximum price when Washington Gas is ready to buy gas and
(iii) use a combination of put and call options to
limit price exposure within an acceptable range. Regulatory
approval for Virginia is permanent. The regulatory approval in
the District of Columbia is pursuant to a pilot program, and
Washington Gas will be seeking to continue this program. The
current Maryland authority stems from March 2009 Orders
directing Washington Gas to hedge 40% of its summer storage fill
volumes at or below a certain price, but precluded the use of
options. Additionally, pursuant to a three-year pilot program
that expired in the latter half of 2008, Washington Gas had
specific regulatory approval in Maryland and Virginia to hedge
the cost of natural gas purchased for storage using financial
transactions in the form of forwards, swaps and option
contracts. Washington Gas has filed for the renewal of the
program in Maryland and Virginia. Additionally, pursuant to a
three-year pilot program in the District of Columbia, Washington
Gas has the ability to hedge the cost of natural gas for storage.
Washington Gas also executes commodity-related physical and
financial contracts in the form of forwards, swaps and option
contracts as part of an asset optimization program that is
managed by its internal staff. These transactions are accounted
for as derivatives. Under this program, Washington Gas realizes
value from its long-term natural gas transportation and storage
capacity resources when not fully being used to serve utility
customers. Regulatory sharing mechanisms in all three
jurisdictions allow the profit from these transactions to be
shared between Washington Gass customers and shareholders.
The following two tables summarize the changes in the fair value
of our net assets (liabilities) associated with the regulated
utility segments energy-related derivatives during the
twelve months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated Utility Segment
|
|
Changes in Fair Value of Energy-Related Derivatives
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
(35.6
|
)
|
Net fair value of contracts entered into during the period
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Other changes in net fair value
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
Realized net settlement of derivatives
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated Utility Segment
|
|
Roll Forward of Energy-Related Derivatives
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
(35.6
|
)
|
Recorded to income
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Recorded to regulatory assets/liabilities
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Net option premium payments
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Realized net settlement of derivatives
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
58
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
The maturity dates of our net assets (liabilities) associated
with the regulated utility segments energy-related
derivatives recorded at fair value at September 30, 2009,
is summarized in the following table based on the level of the
fair value calculation under ASC Topic 820:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated Utility Segment
|
|
Maturity of Net Assets (Liabilities) Associated with our
Energy-Related Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
Level 1Quoted prices in active markets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Level 2Significant other observable inputs
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Level 3Significant unobservable inputs
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
Total net assets (liabilities) associated with our
energy-related derivatives
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
Refer to Notes 5 and 14 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for a further discussion of our derivative
activities and fair value measurements.
Price Risk
Related to the Retail Energy-Marketing Segment
Our retail energy-marketing subsidiary, WGEServices, sells
natural gas and electricity to retail customers at both fixed
and indexed prices. WGEServices must manage daily and seasonal
demand fluctuations for these products with its suppliers. Price
risk exists to the extent WGEServices does not closely match the
timing and volume of natural gas and electricity it purchases
with the related fixed price or indexed sales commitments.
WGEServices risk management policies and procedures are
designed to minimize this risk.
Natural Gas. A portion of
WGEServices annual natural gas sales volumes is subject to
variations in customer demand associated with fluctuations in
weather and other factors. Purchases of natural gas to fulfill
retail sales commitments are generally made under fixed-volume
contracts based on certain weather assumptions. If there is
significant deviation from normal weather or other factors which
affect customer usage, this may cause our purchase commitments
to differ significantly from actual customer usage. To the
extent that WGEServices cannot match its customer requirements
and supply commitments, it may be exposed to commodity price and
volume variances, which could negatively impact expected gross
margins. WGEServices may manage these risks through the use of
derivative instruments including financial products and
wholesale supply contracts that provide for volumetric
variability.
Electricity. WGEServices procures
electricity supply under contract structures in which
WGEServices assumes the responsibility of matching its customer
requirements with its supply purchases. WGEServices assembles
the various components of supply, including electric energy from
various suppliers, and capacity, ancillary services and
transmission service from the PJM Interconnection, a regional
transmission organization, to match its customer requirements in
accordance with its risk management policy.
To the extent WGEServices has not sufficiently matched its
customer requirements with its supply commitments, it could be
exposed to electricity commodity price risk. WGEServices may
manage this risk through the use of derivative instruments,
including financial products.
WGEServices electric business is also exposed to
fluctuations in weather and varying customer usage. Purchases
generally are made under fixed-price, fixed-volume contracts
that are based on certain weather assumptions. If there are
significant deviations in weather or usage from these
assumptions, WGEServices may incur price and volume variances
that could negatively impact expected gross margins (refer to
the section entitled Weather Risk for a
further discussion of our management of weather risk).
59
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
The following two tables summarize the changes in the fair value
of our net assets (liabilities) associated with the retail
energy-marketing segments energy-related derivatives for
both natural gas and electricity during the twelve months ended
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Energy-Marketing
Segment
|
|
Changes in Fair Value of Energy-Related Derivatives
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
(3.4
|
)
|
Net fair value of contracts entered into during the period
|
|
|
(18.3
|
)
|
Other changes in net fair value
|
|
|
(22.2
|
)
|
Realized net settlement of derivatives
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
(25.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Energy-Marketing
Segment
|
|
Roll Forward of Energy-Related Derivatives
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
(3.4
|
)
|
Recorded to income
|
|
|
(38.3
|
)
|
Recorded to accounts payable
(a)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
Recorded to retained earnings
(b)
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
Net option premium payments
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Realized net settlement of derivatives
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
(25.5
|
)
|
|
(a) Represents
the amount to be paid for future Financial Transmission Rights
related to electricity for WGEServices.
(b) Represents
the cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of
retained earnings or other appropriate components of net assets
upon adoption of
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.
The maturity dates of our net assets (liabilities) associated
with the retail energy-marketing segments energy-related
derivatives recorded at fair value at September 30, 2009,
is summarized in the following table based on the level of the
fair value calculation under ASC Topic 820:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Energy Marketing Segment
|
|
Maturity of Net Assets (Liabilities) Associated with our
Energy-Related Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
Level 1Quoted prices in active markets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Level 2Significant other observable inputs
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3Significant unobservable inputs
|
|
|
(21.3
|
)
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net assets (liabilities) associated with our
energy-related derivatives
|
|
$
|
(25.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Refer to Notes 5 and 14 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for further discussion of our derivative
activities and fair value measurements.
Value-at-Risk. WGEServices
measures the market risk of its energy commodity portfolio by
determining its
value-at-risk.
Value-at-risk
is an estimate of the maximum loss that can be expected at some
level of probability if a portfolio is held for a given time
period. The
value-at-risk
calculation for natural gas and electric portfolios include
assumptions for normal weather, new customers and renewing
customers for which supply commitments have been secured. Based
on a 95% confidence interval for a
one-day
60
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
holding period, WGEServices
value-at-risk
at September 30, 2009 was approximately $27,000 and
$51,000, related to its natural gas and electric portfolios,
respectively.
Weather
Risk
We are exposed to various forms of weather risk in both our
regulated utility and unregulated business segments. For
Washington Gas, a large portion of its revenues is volume driven
and its current rates are based upon an assumption of normal
weather, however, billing adjustment mechanisms described below
address variations from this assumption. Without weather
protection strategies, variations from normal weather will cause
our earnings to increase or decrease depending on the weather
pattern. Washington Gas currently has a weather protection
strategy that is designed to neutralize the estimated financial
effects of weather on its net income, as discussed below.
The financial results of our non-regulated energy-marketing
business, WGEServices, are also affected by variations from
normal weather primarily in the winter relating to its natural
gas sales, and throughout the fiscal year relating to its
electricity sales. WGEServices manages these weather risks with,
among other things, weather derivatives.
Billing Adjustment Mechanisms. In
Maryland, Washington Gas has a RNA billing mechanism that is
designed to stabilize the level of net revenues collected from
Maryland customers by eliminating the effect of deviations in
customer usage caused by variations in weather from normal
levels and other factors such as conservation. In Virginia,
Washington Gas has a WNA mechanism which is a billing adjustment
mechanism that is designed to eliminate the effect of variations
in weather from normal levels on utility net revenues.
For both the RNA and the WNA mechanisms, periods of
colder-than-normal
weather generally would cause Washington Gas to record a
reduction to its revenues and establish a refund liability to
customers, while the opposite would generally result during
periods of
warmer-than-normal
weather. However, factors such as volatile weather patterns and
customer conservation may cause the RNA to function conversely
because it adjusts billed revenues to provide a designed level
of net revenue per meter.
Weather Derivatives. On October 1,
2008, Washington Gas executed three HDD derivative contracts to
manage its exposure to variations from normal weather in the
District of Columbia. Washington Gas purchased an HDD put option
to protect against net revenue shortfalls due to
warmer-than-normal
weather during fiscal year 2009. To offset the cost of this warm
weather protection, Washington Gas sold cold weather benefits in
the form of two HDD call options. The net pre-tax premium cost
of these transactions was $250,000 plus fees of $44,000.
As a result of the
colder-than-normal
weather during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009,
Washington Gas received no warm-weather benefit from this
strategy and paid out $3.0 million on the cold weather
benefits sold. Through September 30, 2009, the Company has
recognized a pre-tax loss from its weather derivatives of
$3.3 million. This loss was offset by higher net revenues
caused by the
colder-than-normal
weather.
On September 21, 2009, Washington Gas executed an HDD
derivative contract to manage its exposure to variations from
normal weather in the District of Columbia during fiscal year
2010. Under this contract, Washington Gas purchased protection
against net revenue shortfalls due to
warmer-than-normal
weather and sold cold weather benefits. This derivative contract
resulted in a payment to Washington Gas of $2.1 million.
WGEServices utilizes HDD derivatives from time to time to manage
weather risks related to its natural gas sales. WGEServices also
utilizes cooling degree day (CDD) derivatives to manage
weather risks related to its electricity sales during the summer
cooling season. These derivatives cover a portion of
WGEServices estimated revenue or energy-related cost
exposure to variations in HDDs or CDDs. Refer to Note 5 of
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a further
discussion of the accounting for these weather-related
instruments.
Interest-Rate
Risk
We are exposed to interest-rate risk associated with our
short-term and long-term financing. Management of this risk is
discussed below.
Short-Term Debt. At September 30,
2009 and 2008, WGL Holdings and its subsidiaries had outstanding
notes payable of $183.8 million and $271.0 million,
respectively. The carrying amount of our short-term debt
approximates fair value. In fiscal year
61
WGL
Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
2009, a change of 100 basis points in the underlying
average interest rate for our short-term debt would have caused
a change in interest expense of approximately $1.8 million.
Long-Term Debt. At September 30,
2009, we had fixed-rate MTNs and other long-term debt
aggregating $561.8 million in principal amount, excluding
current maturities and unamortized discounts, and having a fair
value of $627.8 million. Fair value is defined as the
present value of the debt securities future cash flows
discounted at interest rates that reflect market conditions as
of September 30, 2009. While these are fixed-rate
instruments and, therefore, do not expose us to the risk of
earnings loss due to changes in market interest rates, they are
subject to changes in fair value as market interest rates
change. None of Washington Gass outstanding MTNs,
excluding current maturities, have unexpired put options. None
of Washington Gass outstanding MTNs, excluding current
maturities, have unexpired call options. In addition, a total of
$421.5 million, or approximately 74.5%, of Washington
Gass outstanding MTNs, excluding current maturities, have
make-whole call options, and no associated put options.
Using sensitivity analyses to measure this market risk exposure,
we estimate that the fair value of our long-term debt would
increase by approximately $24.0 million or decrease by
approximately $22.4 million if interest rates were to
decline or increase by 10%, or 41 basis points,
respectively, from current market levels. In general, such an
increase or decrease in fair value would impact earnings and
cash flows only if Washington Gas were to reacquire all or a
portion of these instruments in the open market prior to their
maturity.
Derivative Instruments. Washington Gas
utilizes derivative instruments from time to time in order to
minimize its exposure to the risk of interest-rate volatility.
On July 6, 2009, Washington Gas entered into the following
three interest-rate derivative transactions to mitigate a
substantial portion of the risk of rising interest rates
associated with future debt issuances: (i) a
Treasury lock that expired August 11, 2009 at a gain of
$311,000 (pre-tax), locking in a 3.59% Treasury yield on
$50 million of ten-year debt that was issued on
November 2, 2009 (refer to Liquidity and Capital
Resources in Managements Discussion);
(ii) a forward starting swap that expires
April 6, 2010 and locks in a 4.10% cost for the combined
Treasury and LIBOR exposure on $4 million of ten-year debt
and (iii) a forward starting swap that expires
June 21, 2010 and locks in a 4.19% cost for the combined
Treasury and LIBOR exposure on $20 million of ten-year
debt. The expiration of each unexpired interest-rate derivative
is timed to coincide with expected issuance of new debt
securities whose proceeds will refund maturing medium-term
notes. There was no activity associated with these types of
derivatives in fiscal year 2008.
62
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
WASHINGTON GAS
LIGHT COMPANY
This section of Managements Discussion focuses on
Washington Gas for the reported periods. In many cases,
explanations and disclosures for both WGL Holdings and
Washington Gas are substantially the same.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The results of operations for the regulated utility segment and
Washington Gas are substantially the same; therefore, this
section primarily focuses on statistical information and other
information that is not discussed in the results of operations
for the regulated utility segment. Refer to the section entitled
Results of OperationsRegulated Utility
in Managements Discussion for WGL Holdings for a
detailed discussion of the results of operations for the
regulated utility segment.
Washington Gass net income applicable to its common stock
was $105.3 million, $112.9 million and
$89.2 million for the fiscal years ended September 30,
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net income for fiscal year
2009, decreased $7.6 million over fiscal year 2008,
reflecting the unfavorable effects of changes in natural gas
consumption patterns that benefited 2008 net revenues and a
scheduled increase in the level of recurring service costs
related to our business process outsourcing, partially offset by
additional net revenues attributable to customer growth and
lower employee benefit expense. Net income for fiscal year 2008,
increased $23.7 million over fiscal year 2007 primarily
reflecting new rates in all jurisdictions as well as earnings
from our new asset optimization strategy, partially offset by
higher operation and maintenance expenses. Key gas delivery,
weather and meter statistics are shown in the table below for
the fiscal years ending September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Deliveries, Weather and Meter Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Increase (decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
vs. 2008
|
|
|
vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Sales and Deliveries (millions of therms)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas sold and delivered
|
|
|
893.0
|
|
|
|
826.9
|
|
|
|
852.7
|
|
|
|
66.1
|
|
|
|
(25.8
|
)
|
Gas delivered for others
|
|
|
462.1
|
|
|
|
434.0
|
|
|
|
433.4
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
Total firm
|
|
|
1,355.1
|
|
|
|
1,260.9
|
|
|
|
1,286.1
|
|
|
|
94.2
|
|
|
|
(25.2
|
)
|
|
Interruptible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas sold and delivered
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Gas delivered for others
|
|
|
273.8
|
|
|
|
256.7
|
|
|
|
267.3
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
(10.6
|
)
|
|
Total interruptible
|
|
|
277.2
|
|
|
|
263.2
|
|
|
|
272.6
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|
Electric generationdelivered for others
|
|
|
102.8
|
|
|
|
92.1
|
|
|
|
111.9
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
(19.8
|
)
|
|
Total deliveries
|
|
|
1,735.1
|
|
|
|
1,616.2
|
|
|
|
1,670.6
|
|
|
|
118.9
|
|
|
|
(54.4
|
)
|
|
Degree Days
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
4,211
|
|
|
|
3,458
|
|
|
|
3,955
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
Normal
|
|
|
3,773
|
|
|
|
3,788
|
|
|
|
3,815
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Percent colder (warmer) than normal
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Average active customer meters
|
|
|
1,065,573
|
|
|
|
1,055,396
|
|
|
|
1,045,709
|
|
|
|
10,177
|
|
|
|
9,687
|
|
New customer meters added
|
|
|
11,011
|
|
|
|
12,962
|
|
|
|
19,373
|
|
|
|
(1,951
|
)
|
|
|
(6,411
|
)
|
|
Gas Service to
Firm Customers
The volume of gas delivered to firm customers is highly
sensitive to weather variability as a large portion of the
natural gas delivered by Washington Gas is used for space
heating. Washington Gass rates are based on an assumption
of normal weather. The tariffs in the Maryland and Virginia
jurisdictions include provisions that consider the effects of
the RNA and WNA mechanisms, respectively, which are designed to,
among other things, eliminate the effect in net revenues of
variations in weather from normal
63
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
levels (refer to the section entitled Weather
Risk for a further discussion of these mechanisms and
other weather-related instruments included in our weather
protection strategy). In addition to these mechanisms, the
combination of declining block rates in the Maryland and
Virginia jurisdictions and the existence of a fixed demand
charges in all jurisdictions to collect a portion of revenues
reduce the effect that variations from normal weather have on
net revenues.
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year
2008. During the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009, total gas deliveries to firm customers
were 1.355 billion therms, an increase of 94.2 million
therms, or 7.5%, in deliveries from fiscal year 2008. This
comparison in natural gas deliveries to firm customers primarily
reflects colder weather in the current fiscal year than the
prior year as well as an increase in average active customer
meters of 10,177.
In relation to normal weather patterns, weather for fiscal year
2009 was 11.6% colder than normal, as compared to 8.7% warmer
than normal for fiscal year 2008. Washington Gass overall
weather protection strategy in 2009 is designed to neutralize
the variations from normal weather on earnings; therefore, the
effects of weather were insignificant for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009.
Many customers choose to buy the natural gas commodity from
unregulated third party marketers, rather than purchase the
natural gas commodity and delivery service from Washington Gas
on a bundled basis. Natural gas delivered to firm
customers but purchased from unregulated third party marketers
represented 34.1% of total firm therms delivered during fiscal
year 2009, compared to 34.4% and 33.7% of therms delivered
during fiscal years 2008 and 2007, respectively. On a per unit
basis, Washington Gas earns the same net revenues from
delivering gas for others as it earns from bundled gas sales in
which customers purchase both the natural gas commodity and the
associated delivery service from Washington Gas. Therefore,
Washington Gas does not experience any loss in utility net
revenues when customers choose to purchase the natural gas
commodity from an unregulated third party marketer.
Fiscal Year 2008 vs. Fiscal Year
2007. During the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008, total gas deliveries to firm customers
were 1.261 billion therms, a decrease of 25.2 million
therms, or 2.0%, in deliveries from fiscal year 2007. This
comparison in natural gas deliveries to firm customers primarily
reflects warmer weather in the current fiscal year than the
prior year partially offset by an increase in average active
customer meters of 9,687, well as the favorable effects of
changes in natural gas consumption patterns due to shifts in
weather patterns and non-weather related factors.
In relation to normal weather patterns, weather for fiscal year
2008 was 8.7% warmer than normal, as compared to 3.7% colder
than normal for fiscal year 2007. Washington Gass overall
weather protection strategy in 2008 and 2007 was designed to
neutralize the estimated negative financial effects of
warmer-than-normal
weather on earnings; therefore, there were no estimated effects
on net income from the
warmer-than-normal
weather in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.
Including the effects of our weather protection strategies, the
colder-than-normal
weather in fiscal year 2007 enhanced net income by an estimated
$5.4 million (pre-tax).
Natural gas delivered to firm customers but purchased from
unregulated third party marketers represented 34.4% of total
firm therms delivered during fiscal year 2008, compared to 33.7%
and 33.3% of therms delivered during fiscal years 2007 and 2006,
respectively. On a per unit basis, Washington Gas earns the same
net revenues from delivering gas for others as it earns from
bundled gas sales in which customers purchase both the natural
gas commodity and the associated delivery service from
Washington Gas. Therefore, Washington Gas does not experience
any loss in utility net revenues when customers choose to
purchase the natural gas commodity from an unregulated third
party marketer.
Gas Service to
Interruptible Customers
Washington Gas must curtail or interrupt service to this class
of customer when the demand by firm customers exceeds specified
levels. Therm deliveries to interruptible customers increased by
14.0 million therms, or 5.3%, in fiscal year 2009 compared
to fiscal year 2008, reflecting increased demand due to colder
weather. Therm deliveries to interruptible customers decreased
by 9.4 million therms, or 3.4%, in fiscal year 2008
compared to fiscal year 2007, reflecting decreased demand due to
warmer weather.
In the District of Columbia, the effect on net income of any
changes in delivered volumes and prices to interruptible
customers is limited by margin-sharing arrangements that are
included in Washington Gass rate designs in the District
of Columbia. In the District of Columbia, Washington Gas shares
a majority of the margins earned on interruptible gas sales and
deliveries with firm customers. A portion of the fixed costs for
servicing interruptible customers is collected through the firm
customers rate design. Rates for interruptible customers
in Maryland and Virginia are based on a traditional cost of
service approach. In Virginia, Washington Gas retains all
revenues above a pre-approved margin threshold level. In
Maryland, Washington Gas retains a defined amount of revenues
based on a set threshold.
64
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
Gas Service
for Electric Generation
Washington Gas delivers natural gas for use at two electric
generation facilities in Maryland that are each owned by
companies independent of WGL Holdings. During fiscal year 2009,
deliveries to these customers increased 11.6% from fiscal year
2008. During fiscal year 2008, deliveries to these customers
decreased 17.7% from fiscal year 2007. Washington Gas shares
with firm customers a significant majority of the margins earned
from natural gas deliveries to these customers. Therefore,
changes in the volume of interruptible gas deliveries to these
customers do not materially affect either net revenues or net
income.
Cost of
Gas
Washington Gass cost of natural gas sold to customers
includes both fixed and variable components. Washington Gas pays
fixed costs or demand charges to pipeline companies
for system capacity needed to transport and store natural gas.
Washington Gas pays variable costs, or the cost of the natural
gas commodity itself, to natural gas producers and suppliers.
Variations in the utilitys cost of gas expense result from
changes in gas sales volumes, the price of the gas purchased and
the level of gas costs collected through the operation of firm
gas cost recovery mechanisms. Under these regulated recovery
mechanisms, Washington Gas records cost of gas expense equal to
the cost of gas recovered from customers and included in
revenues. The difference between the firm gas costs incurred and
the gas costs recovered from customers is deferred on the
balance sheet as an amount to be collected from or refunded to
customers in future periods. Therefore, increases or decreases
in the cost of gas associated with sales made to firm customers
have no direct effect on Washington Gass net revenues and
net income. Changes in the cost of gas can cause significant
variations in Washington Gass cash provided by or used in
operating activities. Washington Gas receives from or pays to
its customers in the District of Columbia and Virginia, carrying
costs associated with under-collected or over-collected gas
costs recovered from its customers using short-term interest
rates. Additionally, included in Utility cost of gas
for Washington Gas are the net margins associated with our
internal asset optimization program. To the extent these amounts
are shared with customers in Virginia and the District of
Columbia, they are a reduction to the cost of gas invoiced to
customers. Amounts shared with Maryland customers are recorded
in operating revenues. Refer to the section entitled
Market RiskRegulated Utility Segment
for a further discussion of Washington Gass
optimization program.
The commodity cost of gas invoiced to Washington Gas (excluding
the cost and related volumes applicable to asset optimization)
were $0.79, $0.89 and $0.85 per therm for fiscal years 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The lower gas costs in fiscal year
2009 reflect an overall decrease in natural gas price in the
wholesale market. The higher gas costs in fiscal year 2008
reflect a slight increase in the price volatility in the
wholesale market. The lower gas cost in fiscal year 2007
reflects decreased price volatility. Increased gas costs
generally will result in higher short-term debt levels and
greater short-term interest costs to finance higher accounts
receivables and storage gas inventory balances, as well as
result in higher uncollectible accounts expenses.
Revenue
Taxes
Revenue taxes are comprised of gross receipts taxes, PSC fees,
franchise fees and energy taxes. Changes in revenue taxes are
impacted by changes in the volume of gas sold and delivered. The
increase in revenue taxes of $5.8 million in fiscal year
2009 compared to the prior year was mostly attributable to an
increase in therm deliveries in Montgomery County and the
District of Columbia in fiscal year 2009 over the prior year
coupled with higher residential and commercial fuel tax rates
that went into effect during the latter half of 2008. Revenue
taxes were relatively unchanged when comparing fiscal year 2008
and 2007. Revenue taxes are recorded to General taxes and
other assessments in the Statements of Income.
LIQUIDITY AND
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity and capital resources for Washington Gas are
substantially the same as the liquidity and capital resources
discussion included in the Managements Discussion of WGL
Holdings (except for certain items and transactions that pertain
to WGL Holdings and its unregulated subsidiaries). Those
explanations are incorporated by reference into this discussion.
RATES AND
REGULATORY MATTERS
Washington Gas determines its request to modify existing rates
based on the level of net investment in plant and equipment,
operating expenses and the need to earn a just and reasonable
return on invested capital.
65
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
The following table summarizes major rate applications and
results.