Attached files

file filename
EX-12.1 - EX-12.1 - WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COw76273exv12w1.htm
EX-12.4 - EX-12.4 - WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COw76273exv12w4.htm
EX-24 - EX-24 - WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COw76273exv24.htm
EX-21 - EX-21 - WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COw76273exv21.htm
EX-32 - EX-32 - WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COw76273exv32.htm
EX-23 - EX-23 - WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COw76273exv23.htm
EX-31.4 - EX-31.4 - WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COw76273exv31w4.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COw76273exv31w2.htm
EX-10.2 - EX-10.2 - WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COw76273exv10w2.htm
EX-31.3 - EX-31.3 - WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COw76273exv31w3.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31 - WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COw76273exv31w1.htm
EX-10.1 - EX-10.1 - WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COw76273exv10w1.htm
EX-12.3 - EX-12.3 - WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COw76273exv12w3.htm
EX-12.2 - EX-12.2 - WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COw76273exv12w2.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
 
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009
 
             
Commission
  Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter and
  State of
  I.R.S.
File Number   principal office address and telephone number   Incorporation   Employer Identification No.
 
1-16163
  WGL Holdings, Inc.
101 Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20080
(703) 750-2000
  Virginia   52-2210912
0-49807
  Washington Gas Light Company
101 Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20080
(703) 750-4440
  District of
Columbia
and Virginia
  53-0162882
 
       
       
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act (as of September 30, 2009):
       
Title of each class
     Name of each exchange on which registered
       
 WGL Holdings, Inc. common stock, no par value
     New York Stock Exchange
       
 
 
       
       
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act (as of September 30, 2009):
       
Title of each class
     Name of each exchange on which registered
       
Washington Gas Light Company preferred stock,
cumulative, without par value:
     
$4.25 Series
     Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board
$4.80 Series
     Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board
$5.00 Series
     Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board
       
 
Indicate by check mark if each registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
     
WGL Holdings, Inc. 
  Yes [X]  No [  ]
Washington Gas Light Company
  Yes [  ]  No [X]
Indicate by check mark if each registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes [  ]  No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether each registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [X]  No [  ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes [  ]  No [  ].
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants’ knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  [  ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
WGL Holdings, Inc.:
Large Accelerated Filer [X] Accelerated Filer [  ] Non-Accelerated Filer [  ] Smaller Reporting Company [  ]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Washington Gas Light Company:
Large Accelerated Filer [  ] Accelerated Filer [  ] Non-Accelerated Filer [X] Smaller Reporting Company [  ]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Indicate by check mark whether each registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act):  Yes [  ]  No [X]
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, WGL Holdings, Inc., amounted to $1,633,538,203 as of March 31, 2009.
 
WGL Holdings, Inc. common stock, no par value outstanding as of October 31, 2009: 50,264,447 shares.
 
All of the outstanding shares of common stock ($1 par value) of Washington Gas Light Company were held by WGL Holdings, Inc. as of October 31, 2009.
 
 
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of WGL Holdings, Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement and Washington Gas Light Company’s definitive Information Statement in connection with the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A and 14C not later than 120 days after September 30, 2009, are incorporated in Part III of this report.


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009

Table of Contents
 
 
             
PART I
 
       
    Filing Format     1  
    Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements     1  
    3  
  Business        
         Corporate Overview     5  
         Industry Segments     5  
         Environmental Matters     14  
         Other Information     15  
  Risk Factors     16  
  Unresolved Staff Comments     19  
  Properties     20  
  Legal Proceedings     21  
  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     21  
    22  
 
PART II
 
  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities     24  
  Selected Financial Data     25  
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     26  
  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk     71  
  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data     71  
         WGL Holdings, Inc.      72  
         Washington Gas Light Company     77  
         Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements     82  
         Supplementary Financial Information—Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)     128  
  Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure     129  
  Controls and Procedures—WGL Holdings, Inc.      129  
  Controls and Procedures—Washington Gas Light Company     131  
  Other Information     132  
 
PART III
 
  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance of the Registrants     133  
  Executive Compensation     133  
  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters     133  
  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence     133  
  Principal Accountant Fees and Services     133  
 
PART IV
 
  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules     134  
    141  


i


 

WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
 
 
INTRODUCTION
 
FILING FORMAT
 
This annual report on Form 10-K is a combined report being filed by two separate registrants: WGL Holdings, Inc. (WGL Holdings) and Washington Gas Light Company (Washington Gas). Except where the content clearly indicates otherwise, any reference in the report to “WGL Holdings,” “we,” “us” or “our” is to the holding company or the consolidated entity of WGL Holdings and all of its subsidiaries, including Washington Gas which is a distinct registrant that is a wholly owned subsidiary of WGL Holdings.
 
The Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Management’s Discussion) included under Item 7 is divided into two major sections for WGL Holdings and Washington Gas. Included under Item 8 are the Consolidated Financial Statements of WGL Holdings and the Financial Statements of Washington Gas. Also included are the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements that are presented on a combined basis for both WGL Holdings and Washington Gas.
 
SAFE HARBOR FOR FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
Certain matters discussed in this report, excluding historical information, include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the outlook for earnings, revenues and other future financial business performance or strategies and expectations. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as, but not limited to, “estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes,” “plans,” and similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Although the registrants, WGL Holdings and Washington Gas, believe such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, they cannot give assurance that every objective will be achieved. Forward-looking statements speak only as of today, and the registrants assume no duty to update them. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements or historical performance:
 
  •   the level and rate at which costs and expenses are incurred and the extent to which they are allowed to be recovered from customers through the regulatory process in connection with constructing, operating and maintaining Washington Gas’s natural gas distribution system;
 
  •   the ability to implement successful approaches to modify the current or future composition of gas delivered to customers or to remediate the effects of the current or future composition of gas delivered to customers, as a result of the introduction of gas from the Dominion Cove Point or Elba Island facility to Washington Gas’s natural gas distribution system;
 
  •   the availability of natural gas supply and interstate pipeline transportation and storage capacity;
 
  •   the ability of natural gas producers, pipeline gatherers and natural gas processors to deliver natural gas into interstate pipelines for delivery by those interstate pipelines to the entrance points of Washington Gas’s natural gas distribution system as a result of factors beyond our control;
 
  •   changes and developments in economic, competitive, political and regulatory conditions;
 
  •   changes in capital and energy commodity market conditions;
 
  •   changes in credit ratings of debt securities of WGL Holdings or Washington Gas that may affect access to capital or the cost of debt;
 
  •   changes in credit market conditions and creditworthiness of customers and suppliers;
 
  •   changes in relevant laws and regulations, including tax, environmental and employment laws and regulations;
 
  •   legislative, regulatory and judicial mandates or decisions affecting business operations or the timing of recovery of costs and expenses;
 
  •   the timing and success of business and product development efforts and technological improvements;
 
  •   the pace of deregulation efforts and the availability of other competitive alternatives to our products and services;
 
  •   changes in accounting principles;
 
  •   new commodity purchase and sales contracts or financial contracts and modifications in the terms of existing contracts that may materially affect fair value calculations under derivative accounting requirements;


1


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
 
 
  •   the ability to manage the outsourcing of several business processes;
 
  •   acts of nature;
 
  •   terrorist activities and
 
  •   other uncertainties.
 
The outcome of negotiations and discussions that the registrants may hold with other parties from time to time regarding utility and energy-related investments and strategic transactions that are both recurring and non-recurring may also affect future performance. All such factors are difficult to predict accurately and are generally beyond the direct control of the registrants. Accordingly, while they believe that the assumptions are reasonable, the registrants cannot ensure that all expectations and objectives will be realized. Readers are urged to use care and consider the risks, uncertainties and other factors that could affect the registrants’ business as described in this annual report on Form 10-K. All forward-looking statements made in this report rely upon the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.


2


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
 
 
GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS
 
Active Customer Meters: Natural gas meters that are physically connected to a building structure within the Washington Gas distribution system and that receive active service.
 
Asset Optimization Program: A program to optimize the value of Washington Gas’s long-term natural gas transportation and storage capacity resources during periods when these resources are not being used to physically serve utility customers.
 
Book Value Per Share: Common shareholders’ equity divided by the number of common shares outstanding.
 
Bundled Service: Service in which customers purchase both the natural gas commodity and the distribution or delivery of the commodity from the local regulated utility. When customers purchase bundled service from Washington Gas, no mark-up is applied to the cost of the natural gas commodity that is passed through to customers.
 
Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) Agreement: An agreement whereby a service provider performs certain functions that have historically been performed by Washington Gas.
 
City Gate: A point or measuring station at which a gas distribution company such as Washington Gas receives natural gas from an unaffiliated pipeline or transmission system.
 
Cooling Degree Day (CDD): A measure of the variation in weather based on the extent to which the daily average temperature is above 65 degrees Fahrenheit.
 
Delivery Service: The regulated distribution or delivery of natural gas to retail customers. Washington Gas provides delivery service to retail customers in Washington, D.C. and parts of Maryland and Virginia.
 
Design Day: Washington Gas’s design day represents the maximum anticipated demand on Washington Gas’s natural gas distribution system during a 24-hour period assuming a five-degree Fahrenheit average temperature and 17 miles per hour average wind, considered to be the coldest conditions expected to be experienced in the Washington, D.C. region.
 
Design-Build Energy Systems: Formerly known as the “heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC)” segment, the design-build energy systems segment includes the operations of Washington Gas Energy Systems, Inc. which provides design-build energy efficient and sustainable solutions to governmental and commercial clients.
 
Dividend Yield on Book Value: Dividends declared per share divided by book value per share.
 
Earnings Sharing Mechanism (ESM): A rate mechanism that enables Washington Gas to share with shareholders and customers the earnings that exceed a target rate of return on equity.
 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC):  An independent agency of the Federal government that regulates the interstate transmission of electricity, natural gas, and oil. The FERC also reviews proposals to build liquefied natural gas terminals and interstate natural gas pipelines.
 
Financial Contract: A contract in which no commodity is transferred between parties and only cash payments are exchanged in amounts equal to the financial benefit of holding the contract.
 
Firm Customers: Customers whose gas supply will not be disrupted to meet the needs of other customers. Typically, this class of customer comprises residential customers and most commercial customers.
 
Gas Administrative Charge (GAC): A regulatory mechanism designed to remove the cost of uncollectible accounts expense related to gas costs from base rates and instead, permits Washington Gas to collect an amount for this expense through its Purchased Gas Charge provision.
 
Gross Margin: Operating revenues, less the associated cost of natural gas or electricity and revenue taxes. Used to measure the success of the retail energy-marketing segment’s core strategy for the sale of natural gas and electricity.
 
Heating Degree Day (HDD): A measure of the variation in weather based on the extent to which the daily average temperature falls below 65 degrees Fahrenheit.
 
Heavy Hydrocarbons (HHCs): Compounds, such as hexane, which Washington Gas is injecting into its distribution system to treat vaporized liquefied natural gas.
 
Interruptible Customers: Large commercial customers whose service can be temporarily interrupted in order for the regulated utility to meet the needs of firm customers. These customers pay a lower delivery rate than firm customers and they must be able to readily substitute an alternate fuel for natural gas.
 
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG): The liquid form of natural gas.
 
Lower of Cost or Market: The process of adjusting the value of inventory to reflect the lesser of its original cost or its current market value.
 
Mark-to-Market: The process of adjusting the carrying value of a position held in a physical or financial derivative to reflect its current fair value.
 
Market-to-Book Ratio: Market price of a share of common stock divided by its book value per share.
 
New Customer Meters Added: Natural gas meters that are newly connected to a building structure within the Washington Gas distribution system. Service may or may not have been activated.
 
Normal Weather: A forecast of expected HDDs or CDDs based on historical HDD or CDD data.


3


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
 
Payout Ratio: Dividends declared per share divided by basic earnings per share.
 
Performance-Based Rate (PBR) plan: A rate design that includes performance measures for customer service as well as an ESM.
 
Physical Contract: A contract in which the actual physical commodity is transferred between parties to the contract.
 
PSC of DC: The District of Columbia Public Service Commission is a three-member board that regulates Washington Gas’s distribution operations in the District of Columbia.
 
PSC of MD: The Maryland Public Service Commission is a five-member board that regulates Washington Gas’s distribution operations in Maryland.
 
Purchased Gas Charge (PGC): The purchased gas charge represents the cost of gas, gas transportation, gas storage services purchased and other gas related costs. The purchased gas charge is collected from customers through tariffs established by the regulatory commissions that have jurisdiction over Washington Gas.
 
Regulated Utility Segment: Includes the operations of Washington Gas which are regulated by regulatory commissions located in the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia, and the operations of Hampshire Gas Company which are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
 
Retail Energy-Marketing Segment: Unregulated sales of natural gas and electricity to end users by our subsidiary, Washington Gas Energy Services, Inc.
 
Return on Average Common Equity: Net income divided by average common shareholders’ equity.
 
Revenue Normalization Adjustment (RNA): A regulatory billing mechanism designed to stabilize the level of net revenues collected from customers by eliminating the effect of deviations in customer usage caused by variations in weather from normal levels, and other factors such as conservation.
 
SCC of VA: The Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission is a three-member board that regulates Washington Gas’s distribution operations in Virginia.
 
Service Area: The region in which Washington Gas operates. The service area includes the District of Columbia, and the surrounding metropolitan areas in Maryland and Virginia.
 
Tariffs: Documents issued by the regulatory commission in each jurisdiction that set the prices Washington Gas may charge and the practices it must follow when providing utility service to its customers.
 
Third Party Marketer: Unregulated companies that sell natural gas and electricity directly to retail customers. Washington Gas Energy Services, Inc., a subsidiary company of Washington Gas Resources Corporation, is a third party marketer.
 
Therm: A natural gas unit of measurement that includes a standard measure for heating value. We report our natural gas sales and deliveries in therms. A therm of gas contains 100,000 British thermal units of heat, or the energy equivalent of burning approximately 100 cubic feet of natural gas under normal conditions. Ten million therms equal approximately one billion cubic feet of natural gas.
 
Unbundling: The separation of the delivery of natural gas or electricity from the sale of these commodities and related services that, in the past, were provided only by a regulated utility.
 
Utility Net Revenues: Operating revenues less the associated cost of energy and applicable revenue taxes. Used to analyze the profitability of the regulated utility segment, as the cost of gas associated with sales to customers and revenue taxes are generally pass through amounts.
 
Value-At-Risk: A risk measurement that estimates the largest expected loss over a specified period of time under normal market conditions within a specified probabilistic confidence interval.
 
Washington Gas: Washington Gas Light Company is a subsidiary of WGL Holdings, Inc. that sells and delivers natural gas primarily to retail customers in accordance with tariffs set by the PSC of DC, the PSC of MD and the SCC of VA.
 
Washington Gas Resources: Washington Gas Resources Corporation is a subsidiary of WGL Holdings, Inc. that owns the majority of the non-utility subsidiaries.
 
WGEServices: Washington Gas Energy Services, Inc. is a subsidiary of Washington Gas Resources Corporation that sells natural gas and electricity to retail customers on an unregulated basis.
 
WGESystems: Washington Gas Energy Systems, Inc., is a subsidiary of Washington Gas Resources Corporation, that provides design-build energy efficient and sustainable solutions to government and commercial clients.
 
WGL Holdings: WGL Holdings, Inc. is a holding company that became the parent company of Washington Gas Light Company and its subsidiaries effective November 1, 2000.
 
Weather Derivative: A financial instrument that provides protection from variations from normal weather.
 
Weather Insurance Policy: An insurance policy that provides protection from the negative financial effects of weather.
 
Weather Normalization Adjustment (WNA): A billing adjustment mechanism that is designed to minimize the effect of variations from normal weather on utility net revenues.


4


 

WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business
 
ITEM 1.  BUSINESS
 
CORPORATE OVERVIEW
 
WGL HOLDINGS, INC.
 
WGL Holdings is a holding company that was established on November 1, 2000 as a Virginia corporation to own subsidiaries that sell and deliver natural gas and provide a variety of energy-related products and services to customers primarily in the District of Columbia and the surrounding metropolitan areas in Maryland and Virginia. WGL Holdings owns all of the shares of common stock of Washington Gas, a regulated natural gas utility, and all of the shares of common stock of Washington Gas Resources Corporation (Washington Gas Resources), Hampshire Gas Company (Hampshire) and Crab Run Gas Company (Crab Run). Washington Gas Resources owns three unregulated subsidiaries that include Washington Gas Energy Services, Inc. (WGEServices), Washington Gas Energy Systems, Inc. (WGESystems) and Washington Gas Credit Corporation (Credit Corp.).
 
WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COMPANY
 
Washington Gas is a regulated public utility that sells and delivers natural gas to customers in the District of Columbia and adjoining areas in Maryland, Virginia and several cities and towns in the northern Shenandoah Valley of Virginia. Washington Gas has been engaged in the natural gas distribution business for 161 years, since its incorporation by an Act of Congress in 1848. Washington Gas has been a Virginia corporation since 1953 and a corporation of the District of Columbia since 1957.
 
INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
 
We have three operating segments:
 
The regulated utility segment.  The regulated utility segment consists of Washington Gas and Hampshire. Washington Gas, a wholly owned subsidiary of WGL Holdings, is regulated by the Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia (PSC of DC), the Public Service Commission of Maryland (PSC of MD) and the State Corporation Commission of Virginia (SCC of VA). Hampshire, a wholly owned subsidiary of WGL Holdings, is regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Hampshire operates and owns full and partial interests in underground natural gas storage facilities including pipeline delivery facilities located in and around Hampshire County, West Virginia. Washington Gas purchases all of the storage services of Hampshire and includes the cost of these services in the bills sent to its customers. Hampshire operates under a “pass-through” cost of service-based tariff approved by the FERC, and adjusts its billing rates to Washington Gas on a periodic basis to account for changes in its investment in utility plant and expenses.
 
The retail energy-marketing segment.  The retail energy-marketing segment consists of the operations of WGEServices which competes with regulated utilities and other unregulated third party marketers by selling the natural gas and electric commodity directly to residential, commercial and industrial customers with the objective of earning a profit through competitively priced contracts.
 
The design-build energy systems segment.  The design-build energy systems segment, which consists of the operations of WGESystems, provides design-build energy efficient and sustainable solutions to governmental and commercial clients.
 
Transactions not specifically identifiable in one of these three segments are accumulated and reported in the category “Other Activities.” These transactions primarily consist of administrative costs associated with WGL Holdings and Washington Gas Resources. Additionally, these activities include the operations of Crab Run, a small exploration and production company, and Credit Corp., which previously offered financing to customers to purchase gas appliances and other energy-related equipment, but no longer offers this financing.
 
Operating revenues, net income, and total assets for each of our segments are presented in Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


5


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
 
REGULATED UTILITY SEGMENT
 
Description
 
The regulated utility segment consists of approximately 91% of our consolidated total assets. Washington Gas, the core of the regulated utility segment, delivers natural gas to retail customers in accordance with tariffs approved by the regulatory commissions that have jurisdiction over Washington Gas’s rates and terms of service. These regulatory commissions set the rates in their respective jurisdictions that Washington Gas can charge customers for its rate-regulated services. Washington Gas also sells natural gas to customers who have not elected to purchase natural gas from unregulated third party marketers (refer to the section entitled “Natural Gas Unbundling”). Washington Gas recovers the cost of the natural gas to serve firm customers through gas cost recovery mechanisms as approved in jurisdictional tariffs. Any difference between the firm customer gas costs incurred and the gas costs recovered from those firm customers is deferred on the balance sheet as an amount to be collected from or refunded to customers in future periods. Therefore, increases or decreases in the cost of gas associated with sales made to firm customers have no direct effect on Washington Gas’s net revenues and net income.
 
Washington Gas conducts an asset optimization program which utilizes Washington Gas’s storage and transportation capacity resources when not being used to physically serve utility customers by entering into commodity-related physical and financial contracts with third parties with the objective of deriving a profit to be shared with its utility customers (refer to the section entitled “Asset Optimization” for a further discussion of our asset optimization program). Unless otherwise noted, therm deliveries shown related to Washington Gas or the regulated utility segment do not include therms delivered related to our asset optimization program.
 
At September 30, 2009, Washington Gas had 1.064 million active customer meters in an area having a population estimated at 5.3 million and over two million households and commercial structures. Active customer meters reflect all natural gas meters connected to the Washington Gas distribution system, excluding those meters that are not currently receiving service. Washington Gas is not dependent on a single customer or group of customers such that the loss of any one or more of such customers would have a significant adverse effect on its business. The following table lists the number of active customer meters and therms delivered by jurisdiction as of and for the year ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
                                 
Active Customer Meters and Therms Delivered by Jurisdiction  
   
          Millions of Therms
          Millions of Therms
 
    Active Customer
    Delivered
    Active Customer
    Delivered
 
    Meters as of
    Fiscal Year Ended
    Meters as of
    Fiscal Year Ended
 
Jurisdiction   September 30, 2009     September 30, 2009     September 30, 2008     September 30, 2008  
   
 
District of Columbia
    151,922       321.4       151,514       306.4  
Maryland
    431,840       791.8       427,554       732.1  
Virginia
    480,309       621.8       473,964       577.7  
Total
    1,064,071       1,735.0       1,053,032       1,616.2  
 
For additional information on our gas deliveries and meter statistics, refer to the section entitled “Results of Operations” in Management’s Discussion for Washington Gas.
 
Factors critical to the success of the regulated utility segment include: (i) operating a safe and reliable natural gas distribution system; (ii) having sufficient natural gas supplies to serve the demand of its customers; (iii) being competitive with other sources of energy such as electricity, fuel oil and propane; (iv) access to sources of liquidity; (v) recovering the costs and expenses of this business in the rates it charges to customers and (vi) earning a just and reasonable rate of return on invested capital. During fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the regulated utility segment reported total operating revenues related to gas sales and deliveries to external customers of approximately $1.5 billion, $1.6 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively.
 
Rates and Regulatory Matters
 
Washington Gas is regulated by the following state and local government agencies which approve the terms of service and the billing rates that it charges to its customers. The rates charged to utility customers are designed to recover Washington Gas’s operating expenses and natural gas commodity costs and to provide a return on its investment in the net assets used in its firm gas sales and


6


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
 
delivery service. Refer to the section entitled “Rates and Regulatory Matters” in Management’s Discussion for Washington Gas for a discussion of current rates and regulatory matters.
 
District of Columbia Jurisdiction
 
The PSC of DC consists of three full-time members who are appointed by the Mayor with the advice and consent of the District of Columbia City Council. The term of each commissioner is four years. There are no limitations on the number of terms that can be served. The PSC of DC has no time limitation in which it must make decisions regarding modifications to base rates charged by Washington Gas to its customers.
 
Maryland Jurisdiction
 
The PSC of MD currently consists of five full-time members who are appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the Senate of Maryland. Each commissioner is appointed to a five-year term, with no limit on the number of terms that can be served.
 
Washington Gas is required to give 30 days’ notice before filing for a rate increase. The PSC of MD may initially suspend the proposed increase for 150 days following the 30-day notice period, and then has the option to extend the suspension for an additional 30 days. If action has not been taken after 210 days, the requested rates become effective subject to refund.
 
Virginia Jurisdiction
 
The SCC of VA consists of three full-time members who are elected by the General Assembly of Virginia. Each commissioner has a six-year term with no limitation on the number of terms that can be served.
 
Either of two methods may be used to request a modification of existing rates. First, Washington Gas may file an application for a general rate increase in which it may propose new adjustments to the cost of service that are different from those previously approved for Washington Gas by the SCC of VA, as well as a revised return on equity. The proposed rates under this process may take effect 150 days after the filing, subject to refund pending the outcome of the SCC of VA’s action on the application.
 
Second, an expedited rate case procedure is available which provides that proposed rate increases may be effective 30 days after the filing date, also subject to refund. Under the expedited rate case procedure, Washington Gas may not propose any new adjustments for issues not previously approved in its last general rate case, or a change in its return on common equity from the level authorized in its last general rate case. Once filed, other parties may propose new adjustments or a change in the cost of capital from the level authorized in its last general rate case. The expedited rate case procedure may not be available if the SCC of VA decides that there has been a substantial change in circumstances since the last general rate case filed by Washington Gas.
 
Seasonality of Business Operations
 
Washington Gas’s business is weather-sensitive and seasonal because the majority of its business is derived from residential and small commercial customers who use natural gas for space heating purposes. Excluding deliveries for electric generation, in fiscal year 2009 and 2008, approximately 77% and 75%, respectively, of the total therms delivered in Washington Gas’s service area occurred during its first and second fiscal quarters. Washington Gas’s earnings are typically generated during these two quarters, and Washington Gas historically incurs net losses in the third and fourth fiscal quarters. The seasonal nature of Washington Gas’s business creates large variations in short-term cash requirements, primarily due to the fluctuations in the level of customer accounts receivable, unbilled revenues and storage gas inventories. Washington Gas finances these seasonal requirements primarily through the sale of commercial paper and unsecured short-term bank loans. For information on our management of weather risk, refer to the section entitled “Weather Risk” in Management’s Discussion. For information on our management of our cash requirements, refer to the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Management’s Discussion.
 
Natural Gas Supply and Capacity
 
Capacity and Supply Requirements
 
Washington Gas is responsible for acquiring sufficient natural gas supplies, interstate pipeline capacity and storage capacity to meet customer demand. As such, Washington Gas has adopted a diversified portfolio approach designed to satisfy the demand of its customers and to address the constraints on supply, using multiple supply receipt points, dependable interstate pipeline transportation and storage arrangements, and its own substantial storage and peaking capabilities to meet its customers’ demands. Washington Gas’s supply and pipeline capacity plan is based on forecasted system requirements, and takes into


7


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
 
account estimated load growth by type of customer, attrition, conservation, geographic location, interstate pipeline and storage capacity and contractual limitations and the forecasted movement of customers between bundled service and delivery service. Under reduced supply conditions, Washington Gas may implement contingency plans in order to maximize the number of customers served. Contingency plans include requests to conserve to the general population and targeted curtailments to specific sections of the system, consistent with curtailment tariffs approved by regulators in each of Washington Gas’s three jurisdictions.
 
Washington Gas obtains natural gas supplies that originate from the Gulf Coast Region, the Appalachian and Canadian regions, as well as natural gas in the form of vaporized liquefied natural gas (LNG) through the Cove Point LNG terminal owned by Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP and Dominion Transmission, Inc. (collectively Dominion) as discussed below. At September 30, 2009 and 2008, Washington Gas had service agreements with four pipeline companies that provided firm transportation and/or storage services directly to Washington Gas’s city gate. For fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively, these contracts have expiration dates ranging from fiscal years 2010 to 2029 and 2009 to 2028.
 
Cove Point Natural Gas Supply
 
In late fiscal year 2003, Dominion reactivated its Cove Point LNG terminal. The composition of the vaporized LNG received from the Cove Point LNG terminal resulted in increased leaks in mechanical couplings on the portion of our distribution system in Prince George’s County, Maryland that directly receives the Cove Point gas. Through a pipeline replacement project and the construction of a heavy hydrocarbon (HHC) injection facility at the gate station that exclusively receives gas from the Cove Point terminal, Washington Gas has reduced the occurrence of new coupling leaks in this area of the distribution system. A recent expansion of the physical capacity of the Cove Point terminal could result in a substantial increase in the receipt of Cove Point gas into additional portions of Washington Gas’s distribution system as greater volumes of Cove Point gas are introduced into other downstream pipelines that provide service to Washington Gas. Based upon engineering and flow studies and our experience, this increase in the receipt of Cove Point gas is likely to result in a significantly greater number of leaks in other parts of Washington Gas’s distribution system, unless our efforts to mitigate these additional leaks are successful. Washington Gas is attempting to mitigate this anticipated increase in leaks through: (i) pipeline replacement programs; (ii) the operation of three HHC injection facilities; (iii)  isolating its interstate pipeline receipt points and limiting the amount of gas received, where possible, from pipelines that transport Cove Point gas; (iv) blending, where possible, the Cove Point gas with other supplies of natural gas from within the continental United States and (v)  continued efforts before the FERC to condition incremental increases in deliveries from the Cove Point terminal on the appropriate resolution of safety concerns consistent with the public interest. Refer to the section entitled “Operating Issues Related To Cove Point Natural Gas Supply” in Management’s Discussion for further information on this issue.
 
Projects for Expanding Capacity
 
As the result of growing demand, Washington Gas anticipates enhancing its peaking capacity by constructing an LNG peaking facility that is currently expected to be completed and placed in service by the 2013-2014 winter heating season, subject to favorable outcomes on certain zoning and legal challenges. This peaking facility will provide two million therms of deliverability and 10 million therms of annual storage capacity. For information related to capital expenditures for this peaking facility, refer to the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Expenditures” in Management’s Discussion. Additionally, Washington Gas has contracted with various interstate pipeline and storage companies to expand its transportation and storage capacity. Recent projects completed or in progress, to expand Washington Gas’s transportation and/or storage capacity, are outlined below:
 
                     
Projects For Expanding Transportation and Storage Capacity (In therms)
    Daily Storage
           
    Transportation
    Annual Storage
    In-Service Date
Pipeline Service Provider   Capacity     Capacity     (Fiscal Year)
 
 
Hardy Storage Company LLC(a)
    800,000       56 million     Three-year phase-in that began in 2007
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Ohio Storage Expansion)(a,b)
    600,000       40 million     2010
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Eastern Market Expansion Storage)(a)
    500,000       30 million     2010
Dominion Transmission Inc. Storage Factory
    1 million       60 million     2015
 
 
(a) Supplier delivers the stored natural gas directly to Washington Gas’s distribution system using the capabilities of the Columbia Gas  Transmission system.
(b) Washington Gas converted 600,000 therms of firm transportation capacity into firm storage capacity in FY 2009.
 


8


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
 
 
Washington Gas will continue to monitor other opportunities to acquire or participate in obtaining additional pipeline and storage capacity that will support customer growth and improve or maintain the high level of service expected by its customer base.
 
Asset Optimization
 
Washington Gas optimizes the value of its long-term natural gas transportation and storage capacity resources during periods when these resources are not being used to physically serve utility customers. Washington Gas utilizes its transportation capacity assets to benefit from favorable natural gas price differentials between different geographic locations and its storage capacity assets to benefit from favorable natural gas price differentials between different time periods. Washington Gas enters into physical and financial derivative transactions in the form of forwards, swaps and option contracts to lock-in operating margins that Washington Gas will ultimately realize. Regulatory sharing mechanisms in all three jurisdictions allow the profit from these transactions to be shared between Washington Gas’s shareholders and customers; therefore, any changes in fair value are recorded through earnings, or as regulatory assets or liabilities, to the extent that gains and losses associated with these derivative instruments will be included in the rates charged to customers.
 
The derivatives used under this program are subject to mark-to-market accounting treatment. This treatment may cause significant period-to-period volatility in earnings from unrealized gains and losses associated with these valuation changes for the portion of net profits to be retained for shareholders; however, this volatility does not change the locked-in operating margins that Washington Gas will ultimately realize from these transactions. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 815, Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading Purposes and Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities, (ASC Topic 815), all physically and financially settled contracts under our asset optimization program are reported on a net basis in the statements of income in “Utility cost of gas”. Total net margins recorded to “Utility cost of gas” after sharing and management fees associated with all asset optimization transactions for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 were $12.2 million.
 
During fiscal year 2009 and 2008, respectively, 774.9 million and 520.6 million therms of natural gas were purchased under our asset optimization program and 772.7 million and 520.1 million therms of natural gas were delivered for contracts that were physically settled related to our internally managed asset optimization program. Refer to the sections entitled “Results of Operations — Regulated Utility” and “Market Risk” in Management’s Discussion for a further discussion of this program and its effect on earnings.
 
Annual Sendout
 
As reflected in the table below, there were six sources of delivery through which Washington Gas received natural gas to satisfy its customer demand requirements in fiscal year 2009. These same six sources also are expected to be utilized to satisfy customer demand requirements in fiscal year 2010. Firm transportation denotes gas transported directly to the entry point of Washington Gas’s distribution system in contractually viable volumes. Transportation storage denotes volumes stored by a pipeline during the spring, summer and fall for withdrawal and delivery to the Washington Gas distribution system during the winter heating season to meet load requirements. Peak load requirements are met by: (i) underground natural gas storage at the Hampshire storage field in Hampshire County, West Virginia; (ii) the local production of propane air plants located at Washington Gas-owned facilities in Rockville, Maryland (Rockville Station) and in Springfield, Virginia (Ravensworth Station) and (iii) other peak-shaving resources. Unregulated third party marketers acquire interstate pipeline and storage capacity and the natural gas commodity on behalf of Washington Gas’s delivery service customers under customer choice programs, some of which may be provided through transportation, storage and peaking resources that may be provided by Washington Gas to the unregulated third party marketers under tariffs approved by the three public service commissions (refer to the section entitled “Natural Gas Unbundling”). These retail marketers have natural gas delivered to the entry point of Washington Gas’s distribution system on behalf of those utility customers that have decided to acquire their natural gas commodity on an unbundled basis, as discussed below.
 
During fiscal year 2009, total sendout on the system was 1,716 million therms, compared to total sendout of 1,610 million therms during fiscal year 2008. This excludes the sendout of sales and deliveries of natural gas used for electric generation. The increase in 2009 was the result of weather in fiscal year 2009 that was colder than fiscal year 2008. The sendout for fiscal year 2010 is estimated at 1,626 million therms (based on normal weather), excluding the sendout for the sales and deliveries of natural gas used for


9


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
 
electric generation. The sources of delivery and related volumes that were used to satisfy the requirements of fiscal year 2009 and those projected for pipeline year 2010 are shown in the following table.

 
                         
Sources of Delivery for Annual Sendout  
   
(In millions of therms)   Fiscal Year  
   
Sources of Delivery   Actual 2008     Actual 2009     Projected 2010  
   
 
Firm Transportation
    588       695       508  
Transportation Storage
    262       228       443  
Hampshire Storage, Company-Owned Propane-Air Plants, and other Peak-Shaving Resources
    20       24       74  
Unregulated Third Party Marketers
    740       769       601  
Total
    1,610       1,716       1,626  
 
Design Day Sendout
 
The effectiveness of Washington Gas’s capacity resource plan is largely dependent on the sources used to satisfy forecasted and actual customer demand requirements for its design day. For planning purposes, Washington Gas assumes that all interruptible customers will be curtailed on the design day. Washington Gas’s forecasted design day demand for the 2009-2010 winter season is 18.4 million therms and Washington Gas’s projected sources of delivery for design day sendout is 19.4 million therms. This provides a reserve margin of approximately 5.3%. Washington Gas plans for the optimal utilization of its storage and peaking capacity to reduce its dependency on firm transportation and to lower pipeline capacity costs. The following table reflects the sources of delivery that are projected to be used to satisfy the forecasted design day sendout estimate for fiscal year 2010.
 
                 
Projected Sources of Delivery for Design Day Sendout  
   
(In millions of therms)   Fiscal Year 2010  
   
Sources of Delivery   Volumes     Percent  
   
 
Firm Transportation
    5.2       27 %
Transportation Storage
    7.3       37 %
Hampshire Storage, Company-Owned Propane-Air Plants, and other Peak- Shaving Resources
    6.8       35 %
Unregulated Third Party Marketers
    0.1       1 %
Total
    19.4       100 %
 
Natural Gas Unbundling
 
At September 30, 2009, customer choice programs for natural gas customers were available to all of Washington Gas’s regulated utility customers in the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia. These programs allow customers to choose to purchase their natural gas from unregulated third party marketers, rather than purchasing this commodity as part of a bundled service from the local utility. Of Washington Gas’s 1.064 million active customers at September 30, 2009, approximately 149,000 customers purchased


10


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
 
their natural gas commodity from unregulated third party marketers. The following table provides the status of customer choice programs in Washington Gas’s jurisdictions at September 30, 2009.
 
                         
Status of Customer Choice Programs
 
At September 30, 2009  
   
Jurisdiction   Customer Class   Eligible Customers  
   
        Total     % Participating  
           
 
District of Columbia
    Firm:                  
        Residential       138,863       9 %
        Commercial       12,838       36 %
      Interruptible       221       91 %
Maryland
    Firm:                  
        Residential       402,227       16 %
        Commercial       29,349       41 %
      Interruptible       264       100 %
Virginia
    Firm:                  
        Residential       452,467       11 %
        Commercial       27,633       31 %
      Interruptible       209       97 %
Total
            1,064,071       14 %
 
When customers choose to purchase the natural gas commodity from unregulated third party marketers, Washington Gas’s net income is not affected because Washington Gas charges its customers the cost of gas without any mark-up. When customers select an unregulated third party marketer as their gas supplier, Washington Gas continues to charge these customers to deliver natural gas through its distribution system at rates identical to the delivery portion of the bundled sales service customers.
 
Competition
 
The Natural Gas Delivery Function
 
The natural gas delivery function, the core business of Washington Gas, continues to be regulated by local regulatory commissions. In developing this core business, Washington Gas has invested $3.2 billion as of September 30, 2009 to construct and operate a safe and reliable natural gas distribution system. Because of the high fixed costs and significant safety and environmental considerations associated with building and operating a distribution system, Washington Gas expects to continue being the only owner and operator of a natural gas distribution system in its current franchise area for the foreseeable future. The nature of Washington Gas’s customer base and the distance of most customers from interstate pipelines mitigate the threat of bypass of its facilities by other potential delivery service providers.
 
Competition with Other Energy Products
 
Washington Gas faces competition based on customers’ preference for natural gas compared to other energy products and the comparative prices of those products. In the residential market, which generates a significant portion of Washington Gas’s net income, the most significant product competition occurs between natural gas and electricity. Because the cost of electricity is affected by the cost of fuel used to generate electricity, such as natural gas, Washington Gas generally maintains a price advantage over competitive electricity supply in its service area for traditional residential uses of energy such as heating, water heating and cooking. Washington Gas continues to attract the majority of the new residential construction market in its service territory, and consumers’ continuing preference for natural gas allows Washington Gas to maintain a strong market presence.
 
In the interruptible market, fuel oil is the prevalent energy alternative to natural gas. Washington Gas’s success in this market depends largely on the relationship between natural gas and oil prices. The supply of natural gas primarily is derived from domestic


11


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
 
sources, and the relationship between supply and demand generally has the greatest impact on natural gas prices. As a large portion of oil comes from foreign sources, political events can have significant influences on oil supplies and, accordingly, oil prices.
 
RETAIL ENERGY-MARKETING SEGMENT
 
Description
 
The retail energy-marketing segment consists of the operations of WGEServices, which competes with regulated utilities and other unregulated third party marketers to sell natural gas and/or electricity directly to residential, commercial and industrial customers in Maryland, Virginia, Delaware and the District of Columbia. WGEServices contracts for its supply needs and buys and resells natural gas and electricity with the objective of earning a profit through competitively priced contracts with end-users. These commodities are delivered to retail customers through the distribution systems owned by regulated utilities such as Washington Gas or other unaffiliated natural gas or electric utilities. Washington Gas delivers the majority of natural gas sold by WGEServices, and unaffiliated electric utilities deliver all of the electricity sold. Additionally, WGEServices bills its customers through the billing services of the regulated utilities that deliver its commodities as well as directly through its own billing capabilities. WGEServices is also expanding its renewable energy and energy conservation product and service offerings. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, WGEServices contracted for and completed the construction of one Solar Photovoltaic (Solar PV) facility, which includes ownership of the operational asset, and has contracted for two additional facilities that are expected to be completed by December 31, 2009. Other than these facilities, WGEServices does not own or operate any natural gas or electric generation, production, transmission or distribution assets. Continued expansion may include the ownership of other renewable energy producing assets.
 
At September 30, 2009, WGEServices served approximately 151,000 residential, commercial and industrial natural gas customers and approximately 113,000 residential, commercial and industrial electricity customers located in Maryland, Virginia, Delaware and the District of Columbia. WGEServices is not dependent on a single customer or concentration of customers such that the loss of any one or more of such customers would have a significant adverse effect on its business.
 
Factors critical to the success of the retail energy-marketing segment include: (i) managing the market risk of the difference between the sales price committed to customers under sales contracts and the cost of natural gas and electricity needed to satisfy these sales commitments; (ii) managing credit risks associated with customers and suppliers; (iii) having sufficient deliverability of natural gas and electric supplies and transportation to serve the demand of its customers which can be affected by the ability of natural gas producers, pipeline gatherers, natural gas processors, interstate pipelines, electricity generators and regional electric transmission operators to deliver the respective commodities; (iv) access to sources of liquidity; (v) controlling the level of selling, general and administrative expenses, including customer acquisition expenses and (vi) the ability to access markets through customer choice programs or other forms of deregulation. The retail energy-marketing segment’s total operating revenues from external customers for fiscal year 2009 was $1.2 billion, and $1.1 billion for each fiscal year ended 2008 and 2007.
 
Seasonality of Business Operations
 
The operations of WGEServices are seasonal, with larger amounts of electricity being sold in the summer months and larger amounts of natural gas being sold in the winter months. Working capital requirements vary significantly during the year, and these variations are financed primarily through WGL Holdings’ issuance of commercial paper and unsecured short-term bank loans. WGEServices accesses these funds through the WGL Holdings money pool. This money pool also accumulates cash from the periodic issuance of WGL Holdings common stock and the operations of certain unregulated subsidiaries, and provides short-term loans to other unregulated subsidiaries to meet various working capital needs.
 
Natural Gas Supply
 
WGEServices purchases its natural gas from a number of wholesale suppliers in order to minimize its supply costs and to avoid relying on any single provider for its natural gas supply. Natural gas supplies are delivered to WGEServices’ market territories through several interstate natural gas pipelines. To supplement WGEServices’ natural gas supplies during periods of high customer demand, WGEServices maintains gas storage inventory in storage facilities that are assigned by natural gas utilities such as Washington Gas. This storage inventory enables WGEServices to meet daily and monthly fluctuations in demand and to minimize the effect of market price volatility.


12


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
 
Electricity Supply
 
The PJM Interconnection (PJM) is a regional transmission organization that regulates and coordinates generation supply and the wholesale delivery of electricity in the states and jurisdictions where WGEServices operates. WGEServices buys wholesale and sells retail electricity in the PJM market territory and is subject to its rules and regulations. PJM requires that its market participants have sufficient load capacity to serve their customers’ load requirements. As such, WGEServices has entered into contracts with multiple electricity suppliers to purchase its electricity and electric capacity needs. These contracts cover various periods ranging from one month to several years into the future.
 
Competition
 
Natural Gas
 
WGEServices competes with the commodity prices offered by regulated gas utilities and other third party marketers to sell natural gas to customers both inside and outside of the Washington Gas service area. Marketers of natural gas compete largely on price; therefore, gross margins are relatively small. To determine competitive pricing and in adherence to its risk management policies and procedures, WGEServices manages its natural gas contract portfolio by closely matching the timing of gas purchases from wholesale suppliers with retail sales commitments to customers. For a discussion of WGEServices’ exposure to and management of price risk, refer to the section entitled “Market Risk—Price Risk Related to the Retail Energy-Marketing Segment” in Management’s Discussion.
 
Electricity
 
WGEServices competes with regulated electric utilities and other third party marketers to sell electricity to customers. Marketers of electric supply compete largely on price; therefore, gross margins are relatively small. To determine competitive pricing and in adherence to its risk management policies and procedures, WGEServices manages its electricity contract portfolio by closely matching the timing of electricity purchases from suppliers with sales commitments to customers. For a discussion of WGEServices’ exposure to and management of price risk, refer to the section entitled “Market Risk—Price Risk Related to the Retail Energy-Marketing Segment” in Management’s Discussion.
 
WGEServices’ electric sales opportunities are significantly affected by the price for Standard Offer Service (SOS) offered by electric utilities. These rates are periodically reset based on the regulatory requirements in each jurisdiction and customer class. From time-to-time, significant sales opportunities may exist or sales opportunities may be very limited due to the relationship of these SOS rates to current market prices.
 
DESIGN-BUILD ENERGY SYSTEMS SEGMENT
 
Description
 
The design-build energy systems segment, which consists of the operations of WGESystems, provides design-build energy efficient and sustainable solutions to governmental and commercial clients. WGESystems focuses on upgrading the mechanical, electrical, water and energy-related systems of large governmental and commercial facilities by implementing both traditional as well as alternative energy technologies, primarily in the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia. The design-build energy systems segment derived approximately 80% of its revenues from various agencies of the Federal Government in fiscal year 2009.
 
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, WGESystems had a backlog of $42.0 million and $39.3 million, respectively. This backlog only includes work associated with signed contracts. Of the backlog as of September 30, 2009, the approximate value of work to be completed beyond fiscal year 2010 was $13.2 million.
 
Factors critical to the success of the design-build energy systems segment include: (i)  generating adequate revenue from the government and private sectors in the facility construction and retrofit markets; (ii) building a stable base of customer relationships; (iii) estimating and managing fixed-price contracts; (iv) building and maintaining a stable base of sub-contractor relationships and (v) controlling selling, general and administrative expenses.


13


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (continued)
 
Competition
 
There are many competitors in this business segment. Within the government sector, competitors primarily include companies performing Energy Savings Performance Contracting (ESPC) as well as utilities performing under Utility Energy Saving Contracts (UESC). In the commercial markets, in addition to ESPCs and UESCs, competitors include manufacturers of equipment and control systems and consulting firms. WGESystems competes on the basis of strong customer relationships developed over many years of implementing successful projects, developing and maintaining strong supplier relationships, and focusing in areas where it can bring relative expertise.
 
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
 
We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations related to environmental matters. These evolving laws and regulations may require expenditures over a long timeframe to control environmental effects. Almost all of the environmental liabilities we have recorded are for costs expected to be incurred to remediate sites where we or a predecessor affiliate operated manufactured gas plants (MGPs). Estimates of liabilities for environmental response costs are difficult to determine with precision because of the various factors that can affect their ultimate level. These factors include, but are not limited, to the following:
 
  •  the complexity of the site;
 
  •  changes in environmental laws and regulations at the federal, state and local levels;
 
  •  the number of regulatory agencies or other parties involved;
 
  •  new technology that renders previous technology obsolete or experience with existing technology that proves ineffective;
 
  •  the level of remediation required and
 
  •  variations between the estimated and actual period of time that must be dedicated to respond to an environmentally contaminated site.
 
Washington Gas has identified up to ten sites where it or its predecessors may have operated MGPs. Washington Gas last used any such plant in 1984. In connection with these operations, we are aware that coal tar and certain other by-products of the gas manufacturing process are present at or near some former sites, and may be present at others. Based on the information available to us, we have concluded that none of the sites are likely to present an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment.
 
At one of the former MGP sites, studies show the presence of coal tar under the site and an adjoining property. Washington Gas has taken steps to control the movement of contaminants into an adjacent river by installing a water treatment system that removes and treats contaminated groundwater at the site. Washington Gas received approval from governmental authorities for a comprehensive remediation plan for the majority of the site that permits commercial development of Washington Gas’s property. Washington Gas has entered into an agreement with a national developer for the development of this site in phases. The first two phases have been completed, with Washington Gas retaining a ground lease on each phase. A Record of Decision for that portion of the site not owned by Washington Gas was issued in August, 2006. Negotiations on a consent agreement regarding remediation of that property were postponed when the site was transferred in late 2007 to a new governmental owner and the governmental entities involved agreed to review how the transfer impacts the Record of Decision. On September 21, 2006, governmental authorities notified Washington Gas of their desire to have the utility investigate and remediate river sediments in the area directly in front of the former MGP site. There has been no agreement among Washington Gas and governmental authorities as to the type and level of sediment investigation and remediation that should be undertaken for this area of the river; accordingly, we cannot estimate at this time the potential future costs of such investigation and remediation.
 
At a second former MGP site and on an adjacent parcel of land, Washington Gas developed a “monitoring-only” remediation plan for the site. This remediation plan received approval under a state voluntary closure program.
 
We do not expect that the ultimate impact of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. At the remaining eight sites, either the appropriate remediation is being undertaken, or no remediation should be necessary. See Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of environmental response costs.


14


 

WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1. Business (concluded)
 
OTHER INFORMATION
 
At September 30, 2009, we had 1,410 employees comprising 1,316 utility and 94 non-utility employees. At September 30, 2008, we had 1,448 employees comprising 1,359 utility and 89 non-utility employees.
 
Our code of conduct, corporate governance guidelines, and charters for the governance, audit and human resources committees of the Board of Directors are available on the corporate Web site www.wglholdings.com under the “Corporate Governance” link, and any changes or amendments to these documents will also be posted to this section of our Web site. Copies also may be obtained by request to the Corporate Secretary at WGL Holdings, Inc., 101 Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20080. We make available free of charge on our corporate Web site, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports have been electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additional information about WGL Holdings is also available on its Web site and at the address listed above.
 
Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer certified to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on March 18, 2009 that, as of that date, he was unaware of any violation by WGL Holdings of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards.
 
Our research and development costs during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007 were not material.


15


 

WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1A. Risk Factors
 
ITEM 1A.   RISK FACTORS
 
The risk factors described below should be read in conjunction with other information included or incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form 10-K, including an in-depth discussion of these risks in the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks and uncertainties facing us.
 
HOLDING COMPANY
 
Our business may be adversely affected if we are unable to pay dividends on our common stock and principal and interest on our outstanding debt.
 
WGL Holdings is a holding company whose assets consist primarily of investments in our subsidiaries. Accordingly, we conduct all of our operations through our subsidiaries. Our ability to pay dividends on our common stock and to pay principal and accrued interest on our outstanding debt depends on the payment of dividends to us by certain of our subsidiaries or the repayment of funds to us by our principal subsidiaries. The extent to which our subsidiaries do not pay dividends or repay funds to us may adversely affect our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common stock and principal and interest to holders of our debt.
 
If we are unable to access sources of liquidity or capital, or the cost of funds increases significantly, our subsidiaries’ business may be adversely affected.
 
Our ability to obtain adequate and cost effective financing depends on our credit ratings as well as the liquidity of financial markets. Our credit ratings depend largely on the financial performance of our subsidiaries, and a downgrade in our current credit ratings could adversely affect our access to sources of liquidity and capital, as well as our borrowing costs.
 
WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COMPANY
 
Changes in the regulatory environment or unfavorable rate regulation, which can be affected by new laws or political considerations, may restrict or delay Washington Gas’s ability to earn a reasonable rate of return on its invested capital to provide utility service and to recover fully its operating costs.
 
Washington Gas is regulated by the PSC of DC, the PSC of MD and the SCC of VA. These regulatory commissions generally have authority over many of the activities of Washington Gas’s business including, but not limited to, the rates it charges to its customers, the amount and type of securities it can issue, the nature of investments it can make, the nature and quality of services it provides, safety standards, collection practices and other matters. These regulators also may modify Washington Gas’s rates to change the level, type and methods that it utilizes to recover its costs, including the costs to acquire, store, transport and deliver natural gas. The extent to which the actions of regulatory commissions restrict or delay Washington Gas’s ability to earn a reasonable rate of return on invested capital and/or fully recover operating costs may adversely affect its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
 
Washington Gas’s ability to meet customers’ natural gas requirements may be impaired if its contracted gas supplies and interstate pipeline and storage services are not available or delivered in a timely manner.
 
Washington Gas is responsible for acquiring sufficient natural gas supplies, interstate pipeline capacity and storage capacity to meet current and future customers’ annual and seasonal natural gas requirements. If Washington Gas is not able to maintain a reliable and adequate natural gas supply and sufficient pipeline capacity to deliver that supply, it may be unable to meet its customers’ requirements. If Washington Gas is unable to meet customers’ demand requirements, its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows may be adversely affected.
 
Washington Gas needs to acquire additional capacity to deliver natural gas on the coldest days of the year and it may not receive the necessary authorizations to do so in a timely manner.
 
Washington Gas plans to construct a one billion cubic foot liquefied natural gas (LNG) storage facility in Chillum, Maryland, to meet its customers’ forecasted demand for natural gas. The new storage facility is expected to be completed and in service by the 2013-2014 winter heating season. If we are not permitted or are not able to construct this planned facility on a timely basis for any reason, the availability of the next best alternative (which is to acquire additional interstate pipeline transportation or storage capacity) may be limited by market supply and demand, and the timing of Washington Gas’s participation in new interstate pipeline


16


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1A. Risk Factors (continued)
 
construction projects. This could cause an interruption in Washington Gas’s ability to satisfy the needs of some of its customers, which could adversely affect its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
 
Operating issues could affect public safety and the reliability of Washington Gas’s natural gas distribution system, which could adversely affect Washington Gas’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
 
Washington Gas’s business is exposed to operating issues that could affect the public safety and reliability of its natural gas distribution system. Operating issues such as leaks, mechanical problems and accidents could result in significant costs to Washington Gas’s business and loss of customer confidence. The occurrence of any such operating issues could adversely affect Washington Gas’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. If Washington Gas is unable to recover from customers through the regulatory process all or some of these costs and its authorized rate of return on these costs, this also could adversely affect Washington Gas’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
 
The receipt of vaporized LNG into Washington Gas’s natural gas distribution system may result in higher operating expenses and capital expenditures which may have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and may impact system safety.
 
An increase in the volume of vaporized LNG, which contains a low concentration of heavy hydrocarbons (HHCs), is likely to result in increased leaks in Washington Gas’s distribution system. Additional operating expenses and capital expenditures may be necessary to contend with the receipt of increased volumes of vaporized LNG into Washington Gas’ distribution system if the current preventative and remedial measures to mitigate any possible increase in leaks in effected portions of Washington Gas’s distribution system are unsuccessful. These additional expenditures may not be recoverable or may not be recoverable on a timely basis from customers. Additionally, such operating expenses and capital expenditures may not be timely enough to mitigate the challenges posed by increased volumes of vaporized LNG and could result in leakage in couplings at a rate that could compromise the safety of our distribution system. Therefore, these conditions could have a material adverse effect on Washington Gas’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, and may impact system safety.
 
Changes in the relative prices of alternative forms of energy may strengthen or weaken the competitive position of Washington Gas’s natural gas delivery service. If the competitive position of natural gas service weakens, it may reduce the number of natural gas customers in the future and negatively affect Washington Gas’s future cash flows and net income.
 
The price of natural gas delivery service that Washington Gas provides competes with the price of other forms of energy such as electricity, oil and propane. Changing prices of natural gas versus other sources of energy that Washington Gas competes against can cause the competitive position of our natural gas delivery service to improve or decline. A decline in the competitive position of natural gas service in relation to alternative energy sources can lead to fewer natural gas customers, lower volumes of natural gas delivered, lower cash flows and lower net income.
 
A decline in the economy may reduce net revenue growth and reduce future net income and cash flows.
 
A decline in the economy of the region in which Washington Gas operates might adversely affect Washington Gas’s ability to grow its customer base and collect revenues from customers, which may negatively affect net revenue growth and increase costs. An increase in the interest rates Washington Gas pays without the recognition of the higher cost of debt incurred by it in the rates charged to its customers would adversely affect future net income and cash flows.
 
If Washington Gas is unable to access sources of liquidity or capital, or the cost of funds increases significantly, Washington Gas’s business may be adversely affected.
 
Washington Gas’s ability to obtain adequate and cost effective financing depends on its credit ratings as well as the liquidity of financial markets. Washington Gas’s credit ratings depend largely on its financial performance, and a downgrade in Washington Gas’s current credit ratings could adversely affect its access to sources of liquidity and capital, as well its borrowing costs and ability to earn its authorized rate of return.
 
As a wholly owned subsidiary of WGL Holdings, Washington Gas depends solely on WGL Holdings to raise new common equity capital and contribute that common equity to Washington Gas. If WGL Holdings is unable to raise common equity capital, this also could adversely affect Washington Gas’s credit ratings and its ability to earn its authorized rate of return.


17


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1A. Risk Factors (continued)
 
Washington Gas’s risk management strategies and related hedging activities may not be effective in managing its risks, and may result in additional liability for which rate recovery may be disallowed and cause increased volatility in its earnings.
 
Washington Gas’s business requirements expose it to commodity price, weather, credit and interest-rate risks. Washington Gas attempts to manage its exposure to these risks by hedging, setting risk limits and employing other risk management tools and procedures. Risk management activities may not be as effective as planned, and cannot eliminate all of its risks. Washington Gas also may be exposed to additional liability should the anticipated revenue recovery of costs or losses incurred with certain of these risk management activities be subsequently excluded from the determination of revenues by a regulator.
 
Washington Gas’s facilities and operations may be impaired by acts of terrorism.
 
Washington Gas’s natural gas distribution, transmission and storage facilities may be targets of terrorist activities that could result in a disruption of its ability to meet customer requirements. Terrorist attacks may also disrupt capital markets and Washington Gas’s ability to raise capital. A terrorist attack on Washington Gas’s facilities or those of its natural gas suppliers or customers could result in a significant decrease in revenues or a significant increase in repair costs, which could adversely affect its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
 
Washington Gas may face certain regulatory and financial risks related to climate change legislation.
 
A number of proposals to limit greenhouse gas emissions, measured in carbon dioxide equivalent units, are pending at the regional, federal, and international level. These proposals would require us to measure and potentially limit greenhouse gas emissions from our utility operations and our customers or purchase allowances for such emissions. While we cannot predict with certainty the extent of these limitations or when they will become effective, the adoption of such proposals could:
 
  •   increase utility costs related to operations, energy efficiency activities and compliance;
 
  •   affect the demand for natural gas and
 
  •   increase the prices we charge our utility customers.
 
The occurrence of any such legislation could adversely affect Washington Gas’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. If Washington Gas is unable to recover from customers through the regulatory process all or some of these costs and its authorized rate of return on these costs, this also could adversely affect Washington Gas’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
 
WASHINGTON GAS ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
 
WGEServices’ business, earnings and cash requirements are highly weather sensitive and seasonal.
 
The operations of WGEServices, our retail energy-marketing subsidiary, are weather sensitive and seasonal, with a significant portion of revenues derived from the sale of natural gas to retail customers for space heating during the winter months, and from the sale of electricity to customers for cooling during the summer months. Weather conditions directly influence the volume of natural gas and electricity delivered to customers. Weather conditions can also affect the short-term pricing of energy supplies that WGEServices may need to procure to meet the needs of its customers. Deviations in weather from normal levels and the seasonal nature of WGEServices’ business can create large variations in earnings and short-term cash requirements.
 
The ability of WGEServices to meet customers’ natural gas and electricity requirements may be impaired if contracted supply is not available or delivered in a timely manner.
 
Sufficient capability to deliver natural gas and electric supplies to serve the demand of WGEServices’ customers is dependent upon the ability of natural gas producers, pipeline gatherers, natural gas processors, interstate pipelines, suppliers of electricity and regional electric transmission operators to meet these requirements. If WGEServices is unable to secure adequate supplies in a timely manner, either due to the failure of its suppliers to deliver the contracted commodity or the inability to secure additional quantities during significant abnormal weather conditions, it may be unable to meet its customer requirements. Such inability to meet its delivery obligations to customers could result in WGEServices experiencing defaults on contractual terms with its customers, penalties and financial damage payments, the loss of certain licenses and operating authorities, and/or a need to return customers to the regulated utility companies, such as Washington Gas.


18


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 1A. Risk Factors (concluded)
 
The risk management strategies and related hedging activities of WGEServices may not be effective in managing risks and may cause increased volatility in its earnings.
 
WGEServices is exposed to commodity price risk to the extent its natural gas and electricity purchases are not closely matched to its sales commitments in terms of volume and pricing. WGEServices attempts to manage its exposure to commodity price risk, as well as its exposure to weather and credit risks by hedging, setting risk limits, and employing other risk management tools and procedures. These risk management activities may not be as effective as planned, and cannot eliminate all of WGEServices’ risks.
 
Significant increases in interest rates may increase costs.
 
WGEServices depends on short-term debt to finance its accounts receivable and storage gas inventories. Working capital requirements vary significantly during the year and are financed primarily through the issuance of commercial paper and unsecured short-term bank loans by WGL Holdings. The results of operations of WGEServices could be adversely affected if short-term interest rates rose or if we were unable to access capital in a cost-effective manner.
 
WGEServices is dependent on guarantees and access to cash collateral from WGL Holdings.
 
The ability of WGEServices to purchase natural gas and electricity from suppliers is dependent upon guarantees issued on its behalf by WGL Holdings, and upon access to cash collateral through the issuance of commercial paper and unsecured short-term bank loans by WGL Holdings. Should WGL Holdings not renew such guarantees, provide access to cash collateral, or if WGL Holdings’ credit ratings are downgraded, the ability of WGEServices to make commodity purchases at reasonable prices may be impaired, adversely affecting its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
 
Regulatory developments may negatively affect WGEServices.
 
The regulations that govern the conduct of competitive energy marketers are subject to change as the result of legislation or regulatory proceedings. Changes in these regulatory rules could reduce customer growth opportunities for WGEServices, or could reduce the profit opportunities associated with certain groups of existing or potential new customers and, thereby, adversely affect its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
 
Competition may negatively affect WGEServices.
 
WGEServices competes with other non-regulated retail suppliers of natural gas and electricity, as well as with the commodity rate offerings of electric and gas utilities. Increases in competition including utility commodity rate offers that are below prevailing market rates may result in a loss of sales volumes or a reduction in growth opportunities that could adversely affect results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
 
ITEM 1B.   UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
 
None.


19


 

WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
Item 2. Properties
 
ITEM 2.   PROPERTIES
 
At September 30, 2009, we provided services in various areas of the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia, and held certificates of convenience and necessity, licenses and permits necessary to maintain and operate their respective properties and businesses. The regulated utility segment is the only segment where property, plant and equipment are significant assets.
 
Property, plant and equipment is stated at original cost, including labor, materials, taxes and overhead costs incurred during the construction period. Washington Gas calculates depreciation applicable to its utility gas plant in service primarily using a straight-line method over the estimated remaining life of the plant. The composite depreciation and amortization rate of the regulated utility was 3.12%, 3.23% and 3.19% during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which included an allowance for estimated accrued non-legal asset removal costs (see Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
 
At September 30, 2009, Washington Gas had approximately 659 miles of transmission mains, 12,353 miles of distribution mains, and 13,497 miles of distribution services. Washington Gas has the storage capacity for approximately 15 million gallons of propane for peak-shaving.
 
Washington Gas owns approximately 40 acres of land and a building (built in 1970) at 6801 Industrial Road in Springfield, Virginia. The Springfield site houses both operating and certain administrative functions of the utility. Washington Gas also holds title to land and buildings used as substations for its utility operations.
 
Washington Gas also has peaking facilities to enhance deliverability in periods of peak demand in the winter that consist of propane air plants in Springfield, Virginia (Ravensworth Station), and Rockville, Maryland (Rockville Station). Hampshire owns full and partial interests in, and operates underground natural gas storage facilities in Hampshire County, West Virginia. Hampshire accesses the storage field through 12 storage wells that are connected to an 18-mile pipeline gathering system. Concurrent with acquiring and protecting its storage rights, Hampshire has historically acquired certain exploration and development rights in West Virginia principally in the Marcellus Shale and other shale formations. These rights are predominately owned by lease and they are applicable to approximately 26,000 gross acres for the storage facilities of which 13,000 acres of land surrounding its storage facilities may be subject to exploration in addition to its storage function. Hampshire also operates a compressor station utilized to increase line pressure for injection of gas into storage. For fiscal year 2010, we estimate that the Hampshire storage facility has the capacity to supply approximately 2.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas to Washington Gas’s system for meeting winter season demands.
 
Washington Gas owns a 12-acre parcel of land located in Southeast Washington, D.C. Washington Gas entered into an agreement with a national developer to develop this land in phases. Washington Gas selected the developer to design, execute and manage the various phases of the development. The development, Maritime Plaza, is intended to be a mixed-use commercial project that will be implemented in five phases. The first two phases have been developed, with Washington Gas retaining a 99-year ground lease on each phase. See the section entitled “Environmental Matters” under Item 1 of this report for additional information regarding this development.
 
Facilities utilized by our corporate headquarters, as well as by the retail energy-marketing and energy design-build systems segments, are located in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and are leased.
 
The Mortgage of Washington Gas dated January 1, 1933 (Mortgage), as supplemented and amended, securing any First Mortgage Bonds (FMBs) it issues, constitutes a direct lien on substantially all property and franchises owned by Washington Gas other than a small amount of property that is expressly excluded. At September 30, 2009 and 2008, there was no debt outstanding under the Mortgage.
 
Washington Gas executed a supplemental indenture to its unsecured Medium-Term Note (MTN) Indenture on September 1, 1993, providing that Washington Gas will not issue any FMBs under its Mortgage without securing all MTNs with all other debt secured by the Mortgage.


20


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
 
ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
None.
 
ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
 
None.


21


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
 
 
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANTS
 
The names, ages and positions of the executive officers of the registrants at October 31, 2009, are listed below along with their business experience during the past five years. The age of each officer listed is as of the date of filing of this report. There is no family relationship among the officers.
 
Unless otherwise indicated, all officers have served continuously since the dates indicated, and all positions are executive officers listed with Washington Gas Light Company.
 
 
     
Executive Officers
    Date Elected or
Name, Age and Position with the registrants   Appointed
 
 
Vincent L. Ammann, Jr., Age 50 (1)
   
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
  September 30, 2006
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WGL Holdings, Inc. 
  September 30, 2006
Vice President—Finance
  October 1, 2005
Vice President—Finance of WGL Holdings, Inc. 
  October 1, 2005
Assistant to the Chief Financial Officer
  March 29, 2004
     
Beverly J. Burke, Age 58 (1)
   
Vice President and General Counsel
  July 1, 2001
Vice President and General Counsel of WGL Holdings, Inc. 
  July 1, 2001
     
Gautam Chandra, Age 43 (1)
   
Vice President—Business Development, Strategy and Business Process Outsourcing
  October 1, 2009
Vice President—Business Development, Strategy, Business Process Outsourcing and Non-Utility Operations of WGL Holdings, Inc. 
  October 1, 2009
Vice President—Business Process Outsourcing
  July 2, 2007
Vice President—Business Process Outsourcing and Non-Utility Operations of WGL Holdings, Inc. 
  July 2, 2007
Vice President—Performance Improvement
  October 1, 2005
Vice President—Performance Improvement and Non-Utility Operations of WGL Holdings, Inc. 
  October 1, 2005
Division Head—Finance Support and Non-Utility Businesses
  January 5, 2004
Division Head—Achieving Operational Excellence
  December 12, 2002
     
Adrian P. Chapman, Age 52 (1)
   
President and Chief Operating Officer
  October 1, 2009
President and Chief Operating Officer of WGL Holdings, Inc. 
  October 1, 2009
Vice President—Operations, Regulatory Affairs and Energy Acquisition
  October 1, 2005
Vice President—Regulatory Affairs and Energy Acquisition
  March 31, 1999
     
Marcellous P. Frye, Jr., Age 42 (2)
   
Vice President—Support Services
  March 21, 2008
Division Head—Information Technology
  July 2, 2007
Director—Development and ITS Engineering
  August 15, 2005
     
Eric C. Grant, Age 52 (3)
   
Vice President—Corporate Relations
  October 1, 2009
Director—Corporate Communications
  September 4, 2007
     
Terry D. McCallister, Age 53 (1)
   
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
  October 1, 2009
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of WGL Holdings, Inc. 
  October 1, 2009
President and Chief Operating Officer
  October 1, 2001
President and Chief Operating Officer of WGL Holdings, Inc. 
  October 1, 2001


22


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part I
 
     
Executive Officers
    Date Elected or
Name, Age and Position with the registrants   Appointed
 
 
     
Anthony M. Nee, Age 53 (1,4)
   
Treasurer
  February 14, 2009
Treasurer of WGL Holdings, Inc. 
  February 14, 2009
Division Head—Risk Management
  December 8, 2003
Department Head—Risk Management
  February 10, 2003
     
Mark P. O’Flynn, Age 59 (1)
   
Controller
  February 18, 2002
Controller of WGL Holdings, Inc. 
  February 18, 2002
     
Douglas V. Pope, Age 64 (1)
   
Secretary of WGL Holdings, Inc. 
  January 13, 2000
Secretary
  July 25, 1979
Roberta W. Sims, Age 55
   
Vice President—Regulatory Affairs and Energy Acquisition
  October 1, 2009
Vice President—Corporate Relations and Communication
  January 31, 1996
     
Douglas A. Staebler, Age 49 (5)
   
Vice President—Engineering and Construction
  October 31, 2006
Division Head—Engineering
  July 25, 2005
     
William Zeigler, Jr., Age 64
   
Vice President—Human Resources and Organizational Development
  February 1, 2004
Division Head—Organizational Development
  February 10, 2003
 
 
 (1)  Executive Officer of both WGL Holdings, Inc. and Washington Gas Light Company.
 
 (2)  Mr. Frye was previously employed by Global eXchange Services (formerly known as GE Global eXchange Services) based in Gaithersburg, Maryland, where he served as Vice President for Global Application Development. Mr. Frye also held various leadership positions for General Electric Information Services in Rockville, Maryland.
 
 (3)  Mr. Grant was previously employed by The Washington Post newspaper where he served as the Director of Communications, Public Relations and Corporate Philanthropy and the newspaper’s primary spokesperson.
 
 (4)  Mr. Nee joined Washington Gas in 2003, overseeing compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley requirements and the energy risk management function. He has over 20 years of experience in various finance positions in the natural gas and electric power industries. Mr. Nee started his career as a CPA, spending 10 years in public accounting with the Pittsburgh office of Arthur Young.
 
 (5)  Mr. Staebler was previously employed by NUI Corporation—Elizabethtown Gas where he held various positions in engineering, operations and construction and maintenance.

23


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
 
At October 31, 2009, WGL Holdings had 12,801 common shareholders of record. During fiscal years 2009 and 2008, WGL Holdings’ common stock was listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange and was shown as “WGL Hold” or “WGL Hldgs” in newspapers. We did not purchase any of our outstanding common stock during fiscal years 2009 and 2008. The table below shows quarterly price ranges and quarterly dividends paid for fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
 
                                         
Common Stock Price Range and Dividends Paid
      High     Low     Dividends Paid Per Share     Dividend Payment Date
Fiscal Year 2009
                                       
Fourth quarter
    $ 34.39       $ 30.37       $ 0.3675         8/1/2009  
Third quarter
      33.29         28.59         0.3675         5/1/2009  
Second quarter
      35.52         28.89         0.3550         2/1/2009  
First quarter
      37.08         22.40         0.3550         11/1/2008  
Fiscal Year 2008
                                       
Fourth quarter
    $ 36.04       $ 31.10       $ 0.3550         8/1/2008  
Third quarter
      36.22         31.84         0.3550         5/1/2008  
Second quarter
      34.62         30.26         0.3425         2/1/2008  
First quarter
      35.08         31.82         0.3425         11/1/2007  
                                         


24


 

WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
 
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
                                         
   
(In thousands, except per share data)  
Years Ended September 30,   2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  
   
 
SUMMARY OF EARNINGS
                                       
Operating Revenues
                                       
Utility
  $ 1,481,089     $ 1,536,443     $ 1,497,274     $ 1,622,510     $ 1,379,390  
Non-utility
    1,225,767       1,091,751       1,148,734       1,015,373       783,953  
Total operating revenues
  $ 2,706,856     $ 2,628,194     $ 2,646,008     $ 2,637,883     $ 2,163,343  
Income from continuing operations
  $ 120,373     $ 116,523     $ 107,900     $ 94,694     $ 106,072  
Net income applicable to common stock
  $ 120,373     $ 116,523     $ 107,900     $ 87,578     $ 103,493  
Earnings per average common share
                                       
Basic:
                                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 2.40     $ 2.35     $ 2.19     $ 1.94     $ 2.18  
Net income applicable to common stock
  $ 2.40     $ 2.35     $ 2.19     $ 1.80     $ 2.13  
Diluted:
                                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 2.39     $ 2.33     $ 2.19     $ 1.94     $ 2.16  
Net income applicable to common stock
  $ 2.39     $ 2.33     $ 2.19     $ 1.79     $ 2.11  
CAPITALIZATION-YEAR END
                                       
Common shareholders’ equity
  $ 1,097,698     $ 1,047,564     $ 980,767     $ 921,807     $ 893,992  
Washington Gas Light Company preferred stock
    28,173       28,173       28,173       28,173       28,173  
Long-term debt, excluding maturities
    561,830       603,738       616,419       576,139       584,150  
Total capitalization
  $ 1,687,701     $ 1,679,475     $ 1,625,359     $ 1,526,119     $ 1,506,315  
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA
                                       
Total assets—year-end
  $ 3,349,890     $ 3,243,543     $ 3,046,361     $ 2,791,406     $ 2,601,081  
Property, plant and equipment-net—year-end
  $ 2,269,141     $ 2,208,302     $ 2,150,441     $ 2,067,895     $ 1,969,016  
Capital expenditures
                                       
Accrual basis (a)
  $ 137,505     $ 131,433     $ 158,101     $ 161,496     $ 124,014  
Cash basis adjustments
    1,403       3,528       6,430       (1,739 )     (11,246 )
Cash basis
  $ 138,908     $ 134,961     $ 164,531     $ 159,757     $ 112,768  
Long-term obligations—year-end
  $ 561,830     $ 603,738     $ 616,419     $ 576,139     $ 584,150  
COMMON STOCK DATA
                                       
Annualized dividends per share
  $ 1.47     $ 1.42     $ 1.37     $ 1.35     $ 1.33  
Dividends declared per share
  $ 1.4575     $ 1.4075     $ 1.3650     $ 1.3450     $ 1.3225  
Closing price
  $ 33.14     $ 32.45     $ 33.89     $ 31.34     $ 32.13  
Book value per share—year-end
  $ 21.89     $ 20.99     $ 19.89     $ 18.86     $ 18.36  
Return on average common equity
    11.2 %     11.5 %     11.3 %     9.6 %     11.8 %
Dividend yield on book value
    6.7 %     6.8 %     6.9 %     7.2 %     7.2 %
Dividend payout ratio
    60.7 %     59.9 %     62.3 %     74.7 %     62.1 %
Shares outstanding—year-end (thousands)
    50,143       49,917       49,316       48,878       48,704  
UTILITY GAS SALES AND DELIVERIES (thousands of therms)
                                       
Gas sold and delivered
                                       
Residential firm
    689,986       627,527       648,701       593,594       625,251  
Commercial and industrial
                                       
Firm
    203,039       199,363       203,962       213,997       222,587  
Interruptible
    3,377       6,543       5,275       6,185       7,809  
Total gas sold and delivered
    896,402       833,433       857,938       813,776       855,647  
Gas delivered for others
                                       
Firm
    462,051       433,991       433,420       403,812       434,099  
Interruptible
    273,820       256,626       267,305       251,003       279,924  
Electric generation
    102,759       92,176       111,950       108,315       73,874  
Total gas delivered for others
    838,630       782,793       812,675       763,130       787,897  
Total utility gas sales and deliveries
    1,735,032       1,616,226       1,670,613       1,576,906       1,643,544  
OTHER STATISTICS
                                       
Active customer meters—year-end
    1,064,071       1,053,032       1,046,201       1,031,916       1,012,105  
New customer meters added
    11,011       12,962       19,373       24,693       26,682  
Heating degree days—actual
    4,211       3,458       3,955       3,710       4,023  
Weather percent colder (warmer) than normal
    11.6 %     (8.7 )%     3.7 %     (2.5 )%     5.9 %
(a)  Excludes Allowance for Funds Used During Construction and prepayments associated with capital projects. Includes accruals for capital expenditures and other non-cash additions.


25


 

WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
INTRODUCTION
 
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Management’s Discussion) analyzes the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of WGL Holdings, Inc. (WGL Holdings) and its subsidiaries. It also includes management’s analysis of past financial results and potential factors that may affect future results, potential future risks and approaches that may be used to manage them. Except where the content clearly indicates otherwise, “WGL Holdings,” “we,” “us” or “our” refers to the holding company or the consolidated entity of WGL Holdings and all of its subsidiaries.
 
Management’s Discussion is divided into the following two major sections:
 
  •  WGL Holdings—This section describes the financial condition and results of operations of WGL Holdings and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. It includes discussions of our regulated and unregulated operations. WGL Holdings’ operations are derived from the results of Washington Gas Light Company (Washington Gas) and Hampshire Gas Company and the results of our non-utility operations.
 
  •  Washington Gas—This section describes the financial condition and results of operations of Washington Gas, a wholly owned subsidiary that comprises the majority of our regulated utility segment.
 
Both of the major sections of Management’s Discussion—WGL Holdings and Washington Gas—are designed to provide an understanding of our operations and financial performance and should be read in conjunction with the respective company’s financial statements and the combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this annual report.
 
Unless otherwise noted, earnings per share amounts are presented on a diluted basis, and are based on weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding.


26


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
Management’s Discussion Table of Contents
 
         
    Page
 
    27  
    28  
    33  
    36  
       
    37  
    45  
    51  
    56  
    57  
       
    63  
    65  
    65  
 
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
 
     Introduction
 
WGL Holdings, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, sells and delivers natural gas and provides a variety of energy-related products and services to customers primarily in the District of Columbia and the surrounding metropolitan areas in Maryland and Virginia. Our core subsidiary, Washington Gas, engages in the delivery and sale of natural gas that is regulated by regulatory commissions in the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia. Through the wholly owned unregulated subsidiaries of Washington Gas Resources Corporation (Washington Gas Resources), we also offer energy-related products and services. We offer competitively priced natural gas and electricity to customers through Washington Gas Energy Services (WGEServices), our unregulated retail energy-marketing subsidiary. We also offer design-build energy efficient and sustainable solutions focused on upgrading energy related systems of large government and commercial facilities through Washington Gas Energy Systems (WGESystems).
 
WGL Holdings has three operating segments that are described below:
 
  •   regulated utility;
 
  •   retail energy-marketing and
 
  •   design-build energy systems.
 
Transactions that are not significant enough on a stand-alone basis to warrant treatment as an operating segment, and that do not fit into one of our three operating segments, are aggregated as “Other Activities” and included as part of non-utility operations.
 
Regulated Utility.  With approximately 91% of our consolidated total assets, the regulated utility segment consists of Washington Gas and Hampshire Gas Company (Hampshire). Washington Gas, a wholly owned subsidiary of WGL Holdings, delivers natural gas to retail customers in accordance with tariffs approved by the regulatory commissions that have jurisdiction over Washington Gas’s rates. Washington Gas also sells natural gas to customers who have not elected to purchase natural gas from unregulated third party marketers.
 
The rates charged to utility customers are designed to recover Washington Gas’s operating expenses and natural gas commodity costs and to provide a return on its investment in the net assets used in its firm gas sales and delivery service. Washington Gas recovers the cost of the natural gas to serve firm customers through the gas cost recovery mechanisms as approved in jurisdictional tariffs. Any difference between the firm customer gas costs incurred and the gas costs recovered from those firm customers is deferred on the balance sheet as an amount to be collected from, or refunded to, customers in future periods. Therefore, increases or decreases in the cost of gas associated with sales made to firm customers have no direct effect on Washington Gas’s net revenues and net income.


27


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
Washington Gas’s asset optimization program utilizes Washington Gas’s storage and transportation capacity resources when not fully being used to physically serve utility customers by entering into commodity-related physical and financial contracts with third parties with the objective of deriving a profit to be shared with its utility customers (refer to the section entitled “Market Risk” for a further discussion of our asset optimization program). Unless otherwise noted, therm deliveries shown related to Washington Gas or the regulated utility segment do not include therms delivered related to our asset optimization program.
 
Hampshire, a wholly owned subsidiary of WGL Holdings, is regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Hampshire operates and owns full and partial interests in underground natural gas storage facilities including pipeline delivery facilities located in and around Hampshire County, West Virginia. Washington Gas purchases all of the storage services of Hampshire and includes the cost of these services in the bills sent to its customers. Hampshire operates under a “pass-through” cost of service-based tariff approved by the FERC, and adjusts its billing rates to Washington Gas on a periodic basis to account for changes in its investment in utility plant and associated expenses.
 
Retail Energy-Marketing.  The retail energy-marketing segment consists of the operations of WGEServices, a wholly owned subsidiary of Washington Gas Resources. WGEServices competes with regulated utilities and other unregulated third party marketers to sell natural gas and/or electricity directly to residential, commercial and industrial customers in Maryland, Virginia, Delaware and the District of Columbia. WGEServices contracts for its supply needs and buys and resells natural gas and electricity with the objective of earning a profit through competitively priced contracts with end-users. These commodities are delivered to retail customers through the distribution systems owned by regulated utilities such as Washington Gas or other unaffiliated natural gas or electric utilities. WGEServices is also expanding its renewable energy and energy conservation product and service offerings. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, WGEServices contracted for and completed the construction of one Solar PV facility, which includes ownership of the operational asset, and has contracted for two additional facilities that are expected to be completed by December 31, 2009. Other than these facilities, WGEServices does not own or operate any natural gas or electric generation, production, transmission or distribution assets. Continued expansion may include the ownership of other renewable energy producing assets.
 
Design-Build Energy Systems.  Our design-build energy systems segment, which consists of the operations of Washington Gas Energy Systems, Inc. (WGESystems), provides design-build energy efficient and sustainable solutions to government and commercial clients. WGESystems focuses on upgrading the mechanical, electrical, water and energy-related systems of large government and commercial facilities by implementing both traditional as well as alternative energy technologies, primarily in the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia.
 
Refer to the Business section under Item 1 of this report for further discussion of our regulated utility and non-utility business segments. For further discussion of our financial performance by operating segment, refer to Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
PRIMARY FACTORS AFFECTING WGL HOLDINGS AND WASHINGTON GAS
 
The following is a summary discussion of the primary factors that affect the operations and/or financial performance of our regulated and unregulated businesses. Refer to the sections entitled “Business” and “Risk Factors” under Item 1 and Item 1A, respectively, of this report for additional discussion of these and other factors that affect the operations and/or financial performance of WGL Holdings and Washington Gas.
 
     Weather Conditions and Weather Patterns
 
Washington Gas.  Washington Gas’s operations are seasonal, with a significant portion of its revenues derived from the delivery of natural gas to residential and commercial heating customers during the winter heating season. Weather conditions directly influence the volume of natural gas delivered by Washington Gas. Weather patterns tend to be more volatile during “shoulder” months within our fiscal year in which Washington Gas is going into or coming out of the primary portion of its winter heating season. During the shoulder months within quarters ending December 31 (particularly in October and November) and June 30 (particularly in April and May), customer heating usage may not correlate highly with historical levels or with the level of heating degree days (HDDs) that occur, particularly when weather patterns experienced are not consistently cold or warm.


28


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
Washington Gas’s rates are determined on the basis of expected normal weather conditions. Washington Gas has a weather protection strategy that is designed to neutralize the estimated financial effects of variations from normal weather. Refer to the section entitled “Market Risk—Weather Risk” for a further discussion of Washington Gas’s weather protection strategies.
 
WGEServices.  The financial results of our retail energy-marketing subsidiary, WGEServices, are also affected by deviations in weather from normal levels and abnormal customer usage during the shoulder months described above. Since WGEServices sells both natural gas and electricity, WGEServices’ financial results may fluctuate due to unpredictable deviations in weather during the winter heating and summer cooling seasons. WGEServices purchases weather derivatives to help manage this risk. Refer to the section entitled “Market Risk—Weather Risk” for further discussion of WGEServices’ weather derivatives.
 
     Regulatory Environment and Regulatory Decisions
 
Washington Gas is regulated by the Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia (PSC of DC), the Public Service Commission of Maryland (PSC of MD) and the State Corporation Commission of Virginia (SCC of VA). These regulatory commissions approve the terms and conditions of service and the rates that Washington Gas can charge customers for its rate-regulated services in their respective jurisdictions. Changes in these rates as ordered by regulatory commissions affect Washington Gas’s financial performance.
 
Washington Gas expects that regulatory commissions will continue to set the prices and terms for delivery service that give it an opportunity to recover reasonable operating expenses and earn a just and reasonable rate of return on the capital invested in its distribution system.
 
     Natural Gas Supply and Pipeline Transportation and Storage Capacity
 
      Natural Gas Supply and Capacity Requirements
 
Washington Gas.  Washington Gas is responsible for acquiring sufficient natural gas supplies, interstate pipeline capacity and storage capacity to meet its customer requirements. As such, Washington Gas must contract for both reliable and adequate supplies and delivery capacity to its distribution system, while considering: (i) the dynamics of the commodity supply and interstate pipeline and storage capacity markets; (ii) its own on-system natural gas peaking facilities and (iii) the characteristics of its customer base. Energy-marketing companies that sell natural gas to customers located within Washington Gas’ service territory are responsible for acquiring natural gas for their customers; however, Washington Gas allocates certain storage and pipeline capacity related to these customers in accordance with regulatory requirements.
 
The increase in demand for pipeline and storage capacity compared to the available capacity is a business issue for local distribution companies, such as Washington Gas. Aside from the past year or two when the economy and housing market was in a recession, historically, Washington Gas’s customer base has grown at an annual rate of approximately two percent. It is expected to return to this historical growth rate over the next few years as the new housing market recovers. To help maintain the adequacy of pipeline and storage capacity for its growing customer base, Washington Gas has contracted with various interstate pipeline and storage companies to expand its transportation and storage capacity services to Washington Gas. These capacity expansion projects are expected to be placed into service during fiscal years 2010-2015. Additionally, Washington Gas anticipates enhancing its peaking capacity by constructing a liquefied natural gas (LNG) peaking facility that is expected to be completed and placed in service by the 2013-2014 winter heating season (refer to the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Expenditures”). Washington Gas will continue to monitor other opportunities to acquire or participate in obtaining additional pipeline and storage capacity that will support customer growth and improve or maintain the high level of service expected by its customer base.
 
WGEServices.  WGEServices contracts for storage and pipeline capacity to meet its customers’ needs primarily through transportation releases and storage services allocated from the utility companies in the various service territories in which they are providing retail energy marketing.
 
      Diversity of Natural Gas Supply
 
Washington Gas.  An objective of Washington Gas’s supply sourcing strategy is to diversify receipts from multiple production areas to meet all firm customers’ natural gas supply requirements. This strategy is designed to protect Washington Gas’s receipt of supply from being curtailed by possible financial difficulties of a single supplier, natural disasters and other unforeseen events.


29


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
WGEServices.  WGEServices diversifies its wholesale supplier base in order to minimize its supply costs and avoid the negative impacts of relying on any single provider for its natural gas supply. To supplement WGEServices’ natural gas supplies during periods of high customer demand, WGEServices maintains gas inventories in storage facilities that are allocated by natural gas utilities such as Washington Gas.
 
      Volatility of Natural Gas Prices
 
Volatility of natural gas prices does impact customer usage and has different short-term and long-term effects on our business. The impact is also different between the regulated utility segment and the unregulated retail energy-marketing segment as described below.
 
Washington Gas.  Under its regulated gas cost recovery mechanisms, Washington Gas records cost of gas expense equal to the cost of gas that is recovered in revenues from customers for each period reported. An increase in the cost of gas due to an increase in the purchase price of the natural gas commodity generally has no direct effect on Washington Gas’s net income. However, to the extent Washington Gas does not have regulatory mechanisms in place to mitigate the indirect effects of higher gas prices, its net income may decrease for factors such as: (i) lower natural gas consumption caused by customer conservation; (ii) increased short-term interest expense to finance a higher accounts receivable balance and (iii) higher expenses for uncollectible accounts. A Revenue Normalization Adjustment (RNA) billing mechanism in Maryland and other regulatory mechanisms in both Maryland and Virginia help to mitigate these effects on Washington Gas’s revenue and net income. Increases in the price of natural gas can also affect our operating cash flows. Long term impacts of volatile natural gas prices relate to the relative cost of natural gas service versus the availability of substitute products such as electricity, propane and fuel oil.
 
WGEServices.  WGEServices may be negatively affected by the indirect effects of significant increases or decreases in the wholesale price of natural gas. WGEServices’ risk management policies and procedures are designed to minimize the risk that WGEServices’ purchase commitments and the related sales commitments do not closely match (refer to the section entitled “Market Risk” for further discussion of WGEServices’ mitigation of commodity price risk). Additionally, in the short-term, higher natural gas prices may increase the costs associated with uncollectible accounts, borrowing costs, certain fees paid to public service commissions and other costs. To the extent that these costs cannot be recovered from retail customers due to competitive factors, WGEServices’ operating results would be negatively affected. In the long-term, natural gas sales for WGEServices are subject to the same impacts of volatile natural gas prices as described above for Washington Gas.
 
      Non-Weather Related Changes in Natural Gas Consumption Patterns
 
Natural gas supply requirements are affected by changes in the natural gas consumption patterns of our customers that are driven by factors other than weather. Natural gas usage per customer may decline as customers change their consumption patterns in response to: (i) more volatile and higher natural gas prices, as discussed above; (ii) customers’ replacement of older, less efficient gas appliances with more efficient appliances and (iii) a decline in the economy in the region in which we operate. In each jurisdiction in which Washington Gas operates, changes in customer usage profiles have been reflected in recent rate case proceedings where rates have been adjusted to reflect current customer usage. In the District of Columbia, decreases in customer usage by existing customers that occur subsequent to its most recent rate case proceeding will have the effect of reducing revenues, which may be offset by the favorable effect of adding new customers. Under the RNA mechanism in Maryland, changes in customer usage by existing customers that occur subsequent to recent rate case proceedings in the Maryland jurisdiction generally will not reduce revenues because the RNA mechanism stabilizes the level of delivery charge revenues received from customers. In Virginia, a declining block rate structure partially mitigates the income statement effects of declines in consumption.
 
     Maintaining the Safety and Reliability of the Natural Gas Distribution System
 
Maintaining and improving the public safety and reliability of Washington Gas’s natural gas distribution system is our highest priority which provides benefits to both customers and investors through lower costs and improved customer service. Washington Gas continually refines its safety practices, with a particular focus on design, construction, maintenance, operation, replacement, inspection and monitoring practices. Operational issues affecting the public safety and reliability of Washington Gas’s natural gas distribution system that are not addressed within a timely and adequate manner could significantly and adversely affect our future earnings and cash flows, as well as result in a loss of customer confidence.


30


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
Washington Gas is experiencing operational issues associated with the receipt of vaporized LNG from the Cove Point LNG terminal owned by Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP and Dominion Transmission Inc. (collectively Dominion), and a planned expansion of this terminal. Refer to the section entitled “Operating Issues Related To Cove Point Natural Gas Supply” for a discussion of the specific operational issues involved.
 
     Competitive Environment
 
Washington Gas.  Washington Gas faces competition based on customers’ preference for natural gas compared to other energy products, and the comparative prices of those products. The most significant product competition occurs between natural gas and electricity in the residential market. Changes in the competitive position of natural gas relative to electricity and other energy products have the potential of causing a decline in the number of future natural gas customers. At present, Washington Gas has seen no significant evidence that changes in the competitive position of natural gas has contributed to such a decline.
 
The residential market generates a significant portion of Washington Gas’s net income. In its service territory, Washington Gas continues to attract the majority of the new residential construction market. Consumers’ continuing preference for natural gas allows Washington Gas to maintain a strong market presence.
 
In each of the jurisdictions served by Washington Gas, regulators and utilities have implemented customer choice programs to purchase natural gas. These programs allow customers the choice of purchasing their natural gas from unregulated third party marketers, rather than from the local utility. There is no effect on Washington Gas’s net income when customers purchase their natural gas commodity from unregulated third party marketers because Washington Gas charges its customers the cost of gas without any mark-up.
 
WGEServices.  Our unregulated retail energy-marketing subsidiary, WGEServices, competes with regulated utilities and other unregulated third party marketers to sell the natural gas and electric commodity to customers. Marketers of these commodities compete largely on price; therefore, gross margins (representing revenues less costs of energy) are relatively small. WGEServices is exposed to credit and market risks associated with both its natural gas and electric supply (refer to the sections entitled “Credit Risk” and “Market Risk” for further discussion of these risk exposures and how WGEServices manages them).
 
WGEServices’ electric sales opportunities are significantly affected by the price for Standard Offer Service (SOS) offered by electric utilities. These rates, often identified by customer class, are periodically reset based on the regulatory requirements in each jurisdiction. Future opportunities to add new electric customers will be dependent on the competitiveness of the relationship between WGEServices’ service rates, SOS rates offered by local electric utilities and prices offered by other energy marketers.
 
     Environmental Matters
 
We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations related to environmental matters. These evolving laws and regulations may require expenditures over a long timeframe. It is our position that, at this time, the appropriate remediation is being undertaken at all the relevant sites. Refer to Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of these matters.
 
     Industry Consolidation
 
In recent years, the energy industry has seen a number of consolidations, combinations, disaggregations and strategic alliances. Consolidation will present combining entities with the challenges of remaining focused on the customer and integrating different organizations. Others in the energy industry are discontinuing operations in certain portions of the energy industry or divesting portions of their business and facilities.
 
From time to time, we perform studies and, in some cases, hold discussions regarding utility and energy-related investments and strategic transactions with other companies. The ultimate effect on us of any such investments and transactions that may occur cannot be determined at this time.
 
     Economic Conditions and Interest Rates
 
We operate in one of the nation’s largest regional economies, including several of the nation’s wealthiest counties. Over time, the economic strength of our service territory has allowed Washington Gas to expand its regulated delivery service customer base at a


31


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
relatively stable rate. In addition, the region provides an active market for our subsidiaries to market natural gas, electricity and other energy-related products and services.
 
More recently, the economic downturn that began in 2007 and carried through the first half of 2009 now shows tenuous signs of ending. While Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth turned positive in the third calendar quarter of 2009, unemployment remains a serious concern, both nationally and locally. Falling energy prices helped mitigate increases in uncollectible accounts expense in fiscal 2009, but our customer growth rate continued to be lower than pre-recession levels.
 
If economic recovery has indeed begun, it could be sluggish in the near term. The effects on both WGL Holdings and Washington Gas may include the following: (i) continued levels of customer conservation; (ii) year-over-year increases in uncollectible accounts expense; and (iii) continued low growth rates in customers and related capital expenditures. Refer to “Non-Weather Related Changes in Natural Gas Consumption Patterns”, above, for a discussion of regulatory mechanisms in place to mitigate the effects of customer conservation at Washington Gas. Consumer demand for goods, services, and energy may not pick up until unemployment and tight consumer credit conditions ease, leading to a flat or deflationary environment.
 
While capital market conditions have improved somewhat in 2009, especially for high-credit-quality issuers, a lack of credit availability for builders and homebuyers may keep new construction growth at low rates, even as housing prices begin to stabilize. Refer to “Inflation/Deflation” below for a discussion of the regulatory impacts of deflation and the section entitled “General Factors Affecting Liquidity” for a discussion of our access to capital markets. We expect that the effects of a sluggish economy would be partially mitigated for us by continued government spending in our region.
 
Improvements in the growth of the economy could affect the value of our pension plan assets. Continued market improvements could result in lower expenses and funding requirements for our pension and other post-retirement benefit plans in future years.
 
We require short-term debt financing to effectively manage our working capital needs and long-term debt financing to support the capital expenditures of Washington Gas. A rise in interest expense paid without the timely recognition of the higher cost of debt in the utility rates charged by Washington Gas to its customers could adversely affect future earnings. A rise in short-term interest rates without the higher cost of debt being reflected in the prices charged to customers could negatively affect the results of operations of our retail energy-marketing segment.
 
     Inflation/Deflation
 
From time to time, Washington Gas seeks approval for rate increases from regulatory commissions to help it manage the effects of inflation on its operating costs, capital investment, and returns. A significant impact of inflation is on Washington Gas’s replacement cost of plant and equipment. While the regulatory commissions having jurisdiction over Washington Gas’s retail rates allow depreciation only on the basis of historical cost to be recovered in rates, we anticipate that Washington Gas should be allowed to recover the increased costs of its investment and earn a return thereon after replacement of the facilities occurs. Recovery of increased capital and operating costs could be delayed in jurisdictions where performance-based rate plans limit Washington Gas’s ability to file for base rate increases.
 
To the extent Washington Gas experiences a sustained deflationary economic environment, earned returns on invested capital could rise and exceed the levels established in our latest regulatory proceedings. If such circumstances occur during a period or within a jurisdiction not covered by an approved performance-based rate plan, Washington Gas could be subject to a regulatory review to reduce future customer rates in those jurisdictions.
 
     Use of Business Process Outsourcing
 
During fiscal year 2007, Washington Gas entered into a 10-year business process outsourcing (BPO) agreement to outsource certain of its business processes related to human resources, information technology, consumer services and finance operations. While Washington Gas expects the agreement to benefit customers and shareholders during the term of the contract, the continued management of service levels provided is critical to the success of this outsource arrangement.
 
The majority of these selected business processes have already been transitioned to Accenture PLC (Accenture). The remaining transition items are expected to be completed by spring of 2010. Washington Gas has implemented a BPO Governance organization and a comprehensive set of processes to monitor and control the cost effectiveness and quality of services provided through the BPO.


32


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
     Labor Contracts, Including Labor and Benefit Costs
 
Washington Gas has five labor contracts with bargaining units represented by three labor unions. In May 2007, Washington Gas entered into a five-year labor contract with the Teamsters Local Union No. 96 (Local 96), an affiliate of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. The contract covers approximately 600 employees and is effective through May 31, 2012. In August 2008, Washington Gas entered into a 30 month labor contract with The Office and Professional Employees International Union Local No. 2 (A.F.L.-C.I.O.). The contract covers approximately 120 employees and is effective beginning October 1, 2008 through March 31, 2011. Local 96, representing union-eligible employees in the Shenandoah Gas division of Washington Gas, has a five-year labor contract with Washington Gas that became effective on June 14, 2007 and expires on July 31, 2012. This contract covers 23 employees. Additionally, on August 1, 2009, Washington Gas entered into two new two-year labor contracts with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1900 that together, cover approximately 30 employees. These two contracts expire on July 31, 2011. Washington Gas is subject to the terms of its labor contracts with respect to operating practices and compensation matters dealing with employees represented by the various bargaining units described above.
 
     Changes in Accounting Principles
 
We cannot predict the nature or the effect of potential future changes in accounting regulations or practices that have yet to be issued on our operating results and financial condition. New accounting standards could be issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) or the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that could change the way we record and recognize revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities.
 
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America (GAAP) requires the selection and the application of appropriate technical accounting guidance to the relevant facts and circumstances of our operations, as well as our use of estimates to compile the consolidated financial statements. The application of these accounting policies involves judgment regarding estimates and projected outcomes of future events, including the likelihood of success of particular regulatory initiatives, the likelihood of realizing estimates for legal and environmental contingencies, and the probability of recovering costs and investments in both the regulated utility and non-regulated business segments.
 
We have identified the following critical accounting policies discussed below that require our judgment and estimation, where the resulting estimates have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
 
     Accounting for Unbilled Revenue
 
For regulated deliveries of natural gas, Washington Gas reads meters and bills customers on a monthly cycle basis. The billing cycles for customers do not coincide with the accounting periods used for financial reporting purposes. Washington Gas accrues unbilled revenues for gas that has been delivered but not yet billed at the end of an accounting period. In connection with this accrual, Washington Gas must estimate the amount of gas that has not been accounted for on its delivery system and must estimate the amount of the unbilled revenue by jurisdiction and customer class. A similar computation is made for WGEServices to accrue unbilled revenues.
 
     Accounting for Regulatory Operations—Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
 
A significant portion of our business is subject to regulation by independent government regulators. As the regulated utility industry continues to address competitive market issues, the cost-of-service regulation used to compensate Washington Gas for the cost of its regulated operations will continue to evolve. Non-traditional ratemaking initiatives and market-based pricing of products and services could have additional long-term financial implications for us. The carrying cost of Washington Gas’s investment in fixed assets assumes continued regulatory oversight of our operations.
 
Washington Gas’s jurisdictional tariffs contain mechanisms that provide for the recovery of the cost of gas applicable to firm customers. Under these mechanisms, Washington Gas periodically adjusts its firm customers’ rates to reflect increases and decreases in the cost of gas. Annually, Washington Gas reconciles the difference between the gas costs collected from firm customers and the cost of gas incurred. Washington Gas defers any excess or deficiency and either recovers it from, or refunds it to, customers over a subsequent twelve-month period.


33


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
Washington Gas accounts for its regulated operations in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 980, Regulated Operations (ASC Topic 980), which results in differences in the application of GAAP between regulated and unregulated businesses. ASC Topic 980 requires recording regulatory assets and liabilities for certain transactions that would have been treated as expense or revenue in unregulated businesses. Future regulatory changes or changes in the competitive environment could result in WGL Holdings and Washington Gas discontinuing the application of ASC Topic 980 for some of its business and require the write-off of the portion of any regulatory asset or liability that would be no longer probable of recovery or refund. If Washington Gas were required to discontinue the application of ASC Topic 980 for any of its operations, it would record a non-cash charge or credit to income for the net book value of its regulatory assets and liabilities. Other adjustments might also be required.
 
The current regulatory environment and Washington Gas’s specific facts and circumstances support both the continued application of FASB ASC Topic 980 for our regulatory activities and the conclusion that all of our regulatory assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2009 are recoverable or refundable through rates charged to customers.
 
     Accounting for Income Taxes
 
We recognize deferred income tax assets and liabilities for all temporary differences between the financial statement basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, including those where regulators prohibit deferred income tax treatment for ratemaking purposes of Washington Gas. Regulatory assets or liabilities, corresponding to such additional deferred tax assets or liabilities, may be recorded to the extent recoverable from or payable to customers through the ratemaking process. Amounts applicable to income taxes due from and due to customers primarily represent differences between the book and tax basis of net utility plant in service.
 
Effective October 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes). ASC Topic 740 clarifies the accounting for uncertain events related to income taxes recognized in financial statements. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.
 
     Accounting for Contingencies
 
We account for contingent liabilities utilizing ASC Topic 450, Contingencies. By their nature, the amount of the contingency and the timing of a contingent event are subject to our judgment of such events and our estimates of the amounts. Actual results related to contingencies may be difficult to predict and could differ significantly from the estimates included in reported earnings. For a discussion of contingencies, see Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
     Accounting for Derivative Instruments
 
We enter into both physical and financial contracts for the purchase and sale of natural gas and electricity. We designate a portion of our physical contracts related to the purchase of natural gas and electricity to serve our customers as “normal purchases and normal sales” and therefore, they are not subject to the mark-to-market accounting requirements of ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The financial contracts and the portion of the physical contracts that qualify as derivative instruments and are subject to the mark-to-market accounting requirements are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments recoverable or refundable to customers and therefore subject to ASC Topic 980 are recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities while changes in the fair value of derivative instruments not affected by rate regulation are reflected in income. Washington Gas also utilizes derivative instruments that are designed to minimize the risk of interest-rate volatility associated with planned issuances of debt securities.
 
Our judgment is required in determining the appropriate accounting treatment for our derivative instruments. This judgment involves various factors, including our ability to: (i)  evaluate contracts and other activities as derivative instruments subject to the accounting guidelines of ASC Topic 815; (ii) determine whether or not our derivative instruments are recoverable from or refundable to customers in future periods and (iii) derive the estimated fair value of our derivative instruments.
 
If available, fair value is based on actively quoted market prices. In the absence of actively quoted market prices, we seek indicative price information from external sources, including broker quotes and industry publications. If pricing information from external sources is not available, we must estimate prices based on available historical and near-term future price information and/or the use of statistical methods and models that we developed. These models reflect derivative pricing theory, formulated market inputs and forward price projections for various periods.


34


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
     Accounting for Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
 
Washington Gas maintains a qualified, trusteed, employee-non-contributory defined benefit pension plan (qualified pension plan) covering most active and vested former employees of Washington Gas and a separate non-funded supplemental retirement plan (SERP) covering executive officers. Washington Gas accrues the estimated benefit obligation of the SERP as earned by the covered employees and Washington Gas pays, from internal funds, the individual benefits as they are due. Washington Gas also provides certain healthcare and life insurance benefits for retired employees which are accrued and funded in a trust on an actuarial basis over the work life of the retirees. The qualified pension plan, SERP and health and post-retirement plans are collectively referred to as the “Plans”.
 
On July 20, 2009, Washington Gas announced changes to the non-contributory defined benefit pension plan to introduce a new employer-provided retirement benefit under the Washington Gas Light Company Savings Plan (“Savings Plan”) for current management and newly hired employees. With the introduction of the new retirement benefit, effective January 1, 2010, current management employees have the option to either remain in the pension plan or cease participating in the pension plan and receive an enhanced contribution under the Savings Plan. Management employees hired after July 1, 2009, are not eligible to participate in the qualified pension plan.
 
The measurement of the Plans’ obligations and costs is dependent on a variety of factors, such as employee demographics, the level of contributions made to the Plans, earnings on the Plans’ assets and mortality rates. The following assumptions are also critical to this measurement. These assumptions are derived on an annual basis with the assistance of a third party actuarial firm:
 
  •   Discount rate,
 
  •   Expected long-term return on plan assets,
 
  •   Rate of compensation increase and
 
  •   Healthcare cost trend rate.
 
We determine the discount rate by using publicly available indexes from reliable financial sources that parallel the duration of plan liabilities including: (i) consideration and review of average bond yields for 30 year maturities; (ii) bonds with the highest yields at each maturity that are of sufficient quality (AA- or better); (iii) bond yields that are interpolated to prior years (iv) and pension liability indexes. We determine the expected long-term rate of return by averaging the expected earnings for the target asset portfolio. In developing the expected rate of return assumption, we evaluate an analysis of historical actual performance and long-term return projections, which gives consideration to the asset mix and anticipated length of obligation of the Plans. Historically, the expected long-term return on plan assets has been lower for the health and life benefit plan than for the qualified pension plan due to differences in the allocation of the assets in the plan trusts and the taxable status of one of the trusts. We calculate the rate of compensation increase based on salary expectations for the near-term, expected inflation levels and promotional expectations. The healthcare cost trend rate is determined by working with insurance carriers, reviewing historical claims data for the health and life benefit plan, and analyzing market expectations.
 
The following table illustrates the effect of changing these actuarial assumptions, while holding all other assumptions constant:
 
                     
Effect of Changing Critical Actuarial Assumptions
(In millions)       Pension Benefits   Health and Life Benefits
 
        Increase
      Increase
   
    Percentage-Point
  (Decrease)
  Increase
  (Decrease) in
  Increase
    Change in
  in Ending
  (Decrease) in
  Ending
  (Decrease) in
Actuarial Assumptions   Assumption   Obligation   Annual Cost   Obligation   Annual Cost
 
Expected long-term return on plan assets
    +/− 1.00 pt.   n/a   $(6.2) / $6.2   n/a   $(2.7) / $2.7
Discount rate
    +/− 0.25 pt.   $(17.7) / $18.5   $(0.1) / $0.1   $(12.4) / $13.1   $(0.9) / $1.0
Rate of compensation increase
    +/− 0.25 pt.   $2.7 / $(2.6)   $0.3 / $(0.3)   n/a   n/a
Healthcare cost trend rate
    +/− 1.00 pt.   n/a   n/a   $54.1 / $(44.3)   $7.7 / $(6.3)
 
 
 
Differences between actuarial assumptions and actual plan results are deferred and amortized into cost when the accumulated differences exceed ten percent of the greater of the Projected Benefit Obligation or the market-related value of the plan assets. If necessary, the excess is amortized over the average remaining service period of active employees. At September 30, 2009, the discount rate decreased to 6.5% from 7.5% from the comparable period, reflecting the change in long-term interest rates primarily due to


35


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
current market conditions. Refer to Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a listing of the actuarial assumptions used and for a further discussion of the accounting for the Plans.
 
OTHER ACCOUNTING MATTERS
 
We account for our stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation. Under ASC Topic 718, we measure and record compensation expense for both our stock option and performance share awards based on their fair value at the date of grant. Our performance units, however, are liability awards as they settle in cash; therefore, we measure and record compensation expense for these awards based on their fair value at the end of each period until their vesting date. This may cause fluctuations in earnings that do not exist under the accounting requirements for both our stock options and performance shares.
 
We issued both performance shares and performance units in fiscal year 2009; however, we did not issue stock options. As of September 30, 2009, there are prior years’ option grants outstanding with an exercise price at the market value of our common stock on the date of the grant. Our stock options generally have a vesting period of three years, and expire ten years from the date of the grant.
 
Both our performance units and performance shares are valued using a Monte Carlo simulation model, as they both contain market conditions. Performance units and performance shares are granted at target levels. Any performance units that may be earned pursuant to terms of the grant will be paid in cash and are valued at $1.00 per performance unit. Any performance shares that are earned will be paid in shares of common stock of WGL Holdings. The actual number of performance units and performance shares that may be earned varies based on the total shareholder return of WGL Holdings relative to a peer group over the three year performance period. Median performance relative to the peer group earns performance units and performance shares at the targeted levels. The maximum that can be earned is 200% of the targeted levels and the minimum is zero.
 
Refer to Notes 1 and 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion of our share-based awards.


36


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
 
WGL HOLDINGS, INC.
 
     RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
We analyze our results of operations using utility net revenues and retail energy-marketing gross margins. Both utility net revenues and retail energy-marketing gross margins are calculated as revenues less the associated cost of energy and applicable revenue taxes. We believe utility net revenues is a better measure to analyze profitability than gross operating revenues for our regulated utility segment because the cost of the natural gas commodity and revenue taxes are generally included in the rates that Washington Gas charges to customers as reflected in operating revenues. Accordingly, changes in the cost of gas and revenue taxes associated with sales made to customers generally have no direct effect on utility net revenues, operating income or net income. We consider gross margins to be a better reflection of profitability than gross revenues or gross energy costs for our retail energy-marketing segment because gross margins are a direct measure of the success of our core strategy of earning a profit through competitively priced contracts for the purchase of commodity supply and for the sale of natural gas and electricity to end-users.
 
Neither utility net revenues nor retail energy-marketing gross margins should be considered as an alternative to, or a more meaningful indicator of, our operating performance than net income. Our measures of utility net revenues and retail energy-marketing gross margins may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Refer to the sections entitled “Results of Operations—Regulated Utility Operating Results” and “Results of Operations—Non-Utility Operating Results” for the calculation of utility net revenues and retail energy-marketing gross margins, respectively, as well as a reconciliation to operating income and net income for both segments.
 
     Summary Results
 
WGL Holdings reported net income of $120.4 million, or $2.39 per share, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, over net income of $116.5 million, or $2.33 per share, and $107.9 million, or $2.19 per share, for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We earned a return on average common equity of 11.2%, 11.5% and 11.3%, respectively, during each of these three fiscal years.
 
The following table summarizes our net income (loss) by operating segment for fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
 
                                         
Net Income (Loss) by Operating Segment  
   
    Years Ended September 30,     Increase (Decrease)  
   
                      2009
    2008
 
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007     vs. 2008     vs. 2007  
   
 
Regulated Utility
  $ 106.0     $ 113.7     $ 89.9     $ (7.7 )   $ 23.8  
Non-utility operations:
                                       
Retail energy-marketing
    15.0       4.8       22.4       10.2       (17.6 )
Design-Build Energy Systems
    3.1       1.8       0.4       1.3       1.4  
Other, principally non-utility activities
    (3.7 )     (3.8 )     (4.8 )     0.1       1.0  
Total non-utility
    14.4       2.8       18.0       11.6       (15.2 )
Net income
  $ 120.4     $ 116.5     $ 107.9     $ 3.9     $ 8.6  
Earnings per average common share
                                       
Basic
  $ 2.40     $ 2.35     $ 2.19     $ 0.05     $ 0.16  
Diluted
  $ 2.39     $ 2.33     $ 2.19     $ 0.06     $ 0.14  
 
The following is a summary discussion of year-over-year trends related to our results from continuing operations. For a detailed description of material transactions and results, refer to our discussion of operating results by segment below.
 
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year 2008.  Net income for fiscal year 2009, when compared to fiscal year 2008, reflects increased earnings from our non-regulated retail energy-marketing segment, partially offset by lower earnings from our regulated utility segment. Favorably affecting fiscal year 2009 earnings for the retail energy-marketing segment were higher gross margins from the sale of natural gas and electricity, partially offset by higher operating expenses related to increased marketing initiatives. Earnings


37


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
comparisons for our regulated utility segment reflect the unfavorable effects of changes in natural gas consumption patterns that benefited 2008 net revenues and a scheduled increase in the level of recurring service costs related to our business process outsourcing, partially offset by additional net revenues attributable to customer growth and lower employee benefit expense.
 
Fiscal Year 2008 vs. Fiscal Year 2007.  Net income for fiscal year 2008, when compared to fiscal year 2007, reflects increased earnings from our regulated utility segment, partially offset by lower earnings from our retail energy-marketing segment. Favorably affecting fiscal year 2008 earnings for the regulated utility segment were new rates in all jurisdictions, favorable natural gas consumption patterns and a new asset optimization strategy. Earnings comparisons for our retail energy-marketing business reflect lower gross margins from the sale of electricity, partially offset by improved gross margins from natural gas.
 
     Regulated Utility Operating Results
 
The following table summarizes the regulated utility segment’s operating results for fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
 
                                         
Regulated Utility Operating Results  
   
    Years Ended September 30,     Increase (Decrease)  
   
                      2009
    2008
 
(In millions)   2009     2008     2007     vs. 2008     vs. 2007  
   
 
Utility net revenues:
                                       
Operating revenues
  $ 1,505.9     $ 1,552.3     $ 1,513.8     $ (46.4 )   $ 38.5  
Less: Cost of gas
    829.9       885.2       892.4       (55.3 )     (7.2 )
Revenue taxes
    61.1       55.3       55.9       5.8       (0.6 )
Total utility net revenues
    614.9       611.8       565.5       3.1       46.3  
Operation and maintenance
    255.5       250.1       246.3       5.4       3.8  
Depreciation and amortization
    94.5       94.2       89.9       0.3       4.3  
General taxes and other assessments—other
    48.7       43.7       40.6       5.0       3.1  
Operating income
    216.2       223.8       188.7       (7.6 )     35.1  
Interest expense
    44.1       45.4       45.2       (1.3 )     0.2  
Other (income) expenses-net, including preferred stock dividends
    (0.3 )     (0.6 )     (1.3 )     0.3       0.7  
Income tax expense
    66.4       65.3       54.9       1.1       10.4  
Net income
  $ 106.0     $ 113.7     $ 89.9     $ (7.7 )   $ 23.8  
 
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year 2008.  The regulated utility segment reported net income of $106.0 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, compared to net income of $113.7 million reported for fiscal year 2008. The decrease in net income primarily reflects: (i) the $16.1 million unfavorable effects of changes in natural gas consumption patterns that benefited fiscal year 2008; (ii) $4.3 million higher net revenues in fiscal year 2008 due to the timing of prior year rate relief in Maryland; (iii) a $5.0 million scheduled increase in recurring to service costs associated with the implementation of the BPO agreement; (iv) a $5.9 million lower of cost or market adjustment associated with our asset optimization program; (v) a $1.9 million increase in property and other general taxes and (vi) a $1.8 million increase in uncollectible accounts expense due to an adjustment to the accumulated reserve in the current period to reflect changes in economic conditions and an allowance for the effect of a Maryland customer payment relief program.
 
Partially offsetting this decrease were: (i) a $5.1 million increase in net revenues from customer growth representing an increase of over 10,000 average active customer meters over fiscal year 2008; (ii) a $4.6 million reversal of a reserve for disallowed natural gas costs in Maryland due to a February 5, 2009 Order from the Public Service Commission of Maryland (PSC of MD); (iii) a $4.6 million increase in unrealized margins associated with our asset optimization program; (iv) a $3.8 million decease in employee benefits and (v) a $3.1 million decrease in premium costs associated with our weather protection products related to our District of Columbia territory. In addition, under the Virginia Sharing Mechanism (ESM), a liability to customers is accrued when regulated results exceed an earnings threshold. The ESM threshold was exceeded in fiscal year 2008, resulting in a reduction in earnings of


38


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
$5.6 million. During fiscal year 2009, earnings were unaffected as regulated results did not exceed the ESM threshold (refer to the section entitled “Rates and Regulatory Matters—Performance-Based Rate Plans” included in Management’s Discussion for Washington Gas).
 
Fiscal Year 2008 vs. Fiscal Year 2007.  The regulated utility segment reported net income of $113.7 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $23.8 million over net income of $89.9 million reported for fiscal year 2007. This year-over-year increase in net income primarily reflects: (i) new rates that went into effect in Virginia on February 13, 2007, Maryland on November 27, 2007 and the District of Columbia on December 31, 2007; (ii) a $13.2 million increase in realized margins associated with our asset optimization program; (iii) the favorable effects of changes in natural gas consumption patterns due to shifts in weather patterns and other factors and (iv) an increase of nearly 9,700 average active customer meters over fiscal year 2007.
 
Partially offsetting this increase were: (i) an $8.8 million increase in uncollectible accounts expense due to a favorable adjustment to the accumulated reserve made in the prior year to reflect better collections, coupled with the negative effects of the decline in the economy in fiscal year 2008; (ii) a $2.6 million increase in expenses related to paving and leak repair primarily as a result of receiving gas from the Cove Point terminal in a portion of our distribution system in Virginia and (iii) a $5.6 million accrual for an estimated refund to our Virginia customers arising from an ESM that was implemented in 2008 as a part of our Performance-Based Rate (PBR) plan (refer to the section entitled “Rates and Regulatory Matters—Performance-Based Rate Plans” included in Management’s Discussion for Washington Gas).
 
Utility Net Revenues.  The following table provides the key factors contributing to the changes in the utility net revenues of the regulated utility segment between years.
 
                 
Composition of Changes in Utility Net Revenues  
   
    Increase (Decrease)  
   
    2009
    2008
 
(In millions)   vs. 2008     vs. 2007  
   
 
Customer growth
  $ 5.1     $ 5.0  
Estimated Weather effects:
               
Increase (decrease) in colder-than-normal weather effects
          (5.4 )
Offset by weather insurance and derivative products
    7.5       (4.6 )
Estimated change in natural gas consumption patterns
    (16.1 )     10.3  
Impact of rate cases
    (4.3 )     22.8  
Gas administrative charge (GAC)
    1.1       3.1  
Asset optimization:
               
Realized margins
    0.9       13.2  
Unrealized mark-to-market valuations
    4.6       (0.2 )
Lower of cost or market adjustment
    (5.9 )     (2.5 )
Storage carrying costs
          4.8  
ESM
    5.6       (4.8 )
Regulatory adjustment
    (1.1 )     1.1  
Reserve for disallowance of natural gas costs
    4.6        
Other
    1.1       3.5  
Total
  $ 3.1     $ 46.3  
 
Customer growth—Average active customer meters increased 10,200 from fiscal year 2008 to 2009. Average active customer meters increased 9,700 from fiscal year 2007 to 2008.
 
Estimated weather effects—Washington Gas has a weather protection strategy that is designed to neutralize the estimated financial effects of variations from normal weather (refer to the section entitled “Weather Risk” for further discussion of our weather protection strategy). As part of this strategy, on October 1, 2008, Washington Gas purchased weather derivatives to protect against variations from normal weather in the District of Columbia. Washington Gas had weather insurance in fiscal years 2008 and 2007 related to the District of Columbia, which protected us from warmer-than-normal weather but allowed us to retain the benefits of


39


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
colder-than-normal weather. Both the effects of weather insurance and weather derivatives are recorded to “Operation and maintenance expenses”.
 
Weather, when measured by HDDs, was 11.6% colder than normal in fiscal year 2009, 8.7% warmer than normal in fiscal year 2008 and 3.7% colder than normal in fiscal year 2007. Including the effects of our weather protection strategy, there were no material effects on net income attributed to colder or warmer weather on either fiscal year 2009 or 2008. Including the effects of our weather protection strategy, net income was enhanced by an estimated $5.4 million (pre-tax) in fiscal year 2007 in relation to normal weather. Refer to “Results of Operations” in Management’s Discussion for Washington Gas for further discussion of the effects of weather and statistical information for Washington Gas.
 
Estimated change in natural gas consumption patterns—Customer consumption patterns may be affected by shifts in weather patterns in which customer heating usage may not correlate highly with average historical levels of usage per HDD that occur. Natural gas consumption patterns may also be affected by non-weather related factors. The variance in fiscal year 2009 net revenues reflects the changes in natural gas consumption patterns that benefited the comparative period last year.
 
Impact of rate cases—New rates went into effect in Maryland on November 27, 2007. Concurrently, we implemented new Revenue Normalization Adjustment (RNA) factors that allow us, in combination with our approved base rates, to recover anticipated revenues from customers regardless of changes in weather and customer usage. Individual monthly revenues that we can collect from our customers under the RNA reflect the pattern of customer usage during the test year used to set the new base rates. As results for the year ended September 30, 2008 reflect a combination of customer usage patterns from two different test years, the RNA contributed incremental revenue during the fiscal year 2008 as compared to the same period in fiscal year 2009. The year-to-year comparisons for the fiscal year 2008 and 2007 includes the effects of increased rates to firm customers in all jurisdictions, as well as interruptible customers in Maryland.
 
GAC—Represents a regulatory mechanism in all jurisdictions that provides for recovery of uncollectible accounts expense related to changes in gas costs. Higher recoveries reflect the timing of GAC rate increases in DC, partially offset by slightly lower natural gas prices. The related uncollectible accounts expense is included in operation and maintenance expenses.
 
Asset optimization—Contributions to net revenues from our Asset Optimization program remained relatively stable between 2009 and 2008. The significant increase in 2008 net revenues attributable to asset optimization compared to 2007 reflects the retention of all storage and transportation capacity assets for self optimization. We recorded pre-tax unrealized gains of $4.1 million and unrealized losses of $(487,000) and $(265,000) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007 respectively, associated with our energy-related derivatives. When these derivatives settle, either financially or by physical delivery, any unrealized amounts will ultimately be reversed, and Washington Gas will realize margins when combined with the related transactions these derivatives economically hedge. Pre-tax realized gains related to our asset optimization program were $16.5 million, $15.7 million, and $2.5 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Partially offsetting these realized margins were $8.4 million and $2.5 million of unrealized lower-of-cost or market adjustments associated with storage capacity assets utilized for asset optimization for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No lower-of-cost or market adjustments occurred in fiscal year 2007. Refer to the section entitled “Market Risk—Price Risk Related to the Regulated Utility Segment” for further discussion of our asset optimization program.
 
Storage carrying costs—Represents recoverable carrying costs based on the cost of capital approved in each jurisdiction, multiplied by the 12-month average balance of storage gas inventory. The comparison of fiscal year 2008 to 2007 reflects higher average storage gas inventory balances in fiscal year 2008 due to a significant increase in gas prices during the storage fill season which generally occurred in the spring and summer of 2008.
 
Earnings Sharing Mechanism—The Virginia ESM, which was effective on October 1, 2007 enables the sharing of earnings in Virginia that exceed a target rate of return on equity with shareholders and customers. The ESM threshold was exceeded in fiscal year 2008. We recorded $4.8 million of expense related to the obligation recorded for fiscal year 2008, resulting in a reduction in 2008 earnings. Fiscal year 2009 earnings were unaffected as regulated results did not exceed the ESM threshold. In addition, earnings in fiscal year 2009 include the effects of reducing the amount accrued for in 2008 to reflect the actual obligation approved by the SCC of VA. Refer to the section entitled “Rates and Regulatory Matters—Performance- Based Rate Plans” included in Management’s Discussion for Washington Gas for a further discussion of the ESM.
 
Regulatory adjustment—Represents an adjustment of $1.1 million made in fiscal year 2008 applicable to prior fiscal years as a result of an interpretive change in the calculation of interruptible revenue sharing in the District of Columbia.


40


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
Reserve for disallowance of natural gas costs—In the first quarter of 2009, Washington Gas reversed a $4.6 million reserve for disallowed natural gas costs in Maryland to income due to a February 5, 2009 Order from the PSC of MD. This Order resolved a contingency related to a proposed order issued by a Hearing Examiner of the PSC of MD in fiscal year 2006. Refer to the section entitled “Rates and Regulatory Matters” in Management’s Discussion for Washington Gas for further discussion of this matter.
 
Operation and Maintenance Expenses.  The following table provides the key factors contributing to the changes in operation and maintenance expenses of the regulated utility segment between years.
 
                 
Composition of Changes in Operation and Maintenance Expenses  
   
    Increase (Decrease)  
   
(In millions)   2009 vs. 2008     2008 vs. 2007  
   
 
Weather insurance and derivative benefits:
               
(Benefit)/Loss
  $ 7.5     $ (4.6 )
Decrease in premium costs
    (3.1 )      
Business Process Outsourcing (BPO)
    5.0       (0.6 )
Labor and incentive plans
    (1.5 )     3.2  
Employee benefits
    (3.8 )     (2.6 )
Uncollectible accounts
    1.8       8.8  
Other operating expenses
    (0.5 )     (0.4 )
Total
  $ 5.4     $ 3.8  
 
Weather insurance and derivative benefits—The effects of hedging variations from normal weather in the District of Columbia for fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, and in Virginia for fiscal year 2007 are recorded to operation and maintenance expense. During fiscal year 2009, Washington Gas recorded an expense of $2.9 million (pre-tax) related to its weather derivatives as a result of colder-than-normal weather and incurred a cost of $294,000 for premiums on our weather related derivatives. During fiscal year 2008, Washington Gas received a benefit of $4.6 million (pre-tax) from its weather insurance that resulted from warmer-than-normal weather and incurred a cost of $3.4 million for premiums on our weather related derivatives. During fiscal year 2007, we received no benefit as weather was colder than normal during that period. The benefits or losses of the weather-related instruments are offset by the effect of weather on utility net revenues.
 
Business Process Outsourcing—The year-over-year comparison of fiscal year 2009 to 2008 reflects a scheduled increase in the recurring service costs paid to the service provider and amortization expense related to the regulatory asset established for initial BPO implementation costs, partially offset by reduced labor and employee benefits.
 
Labor and incentive plans—The year-over-year comparison of fiscal year 2009 and 2008 reflects the capitalization of certain incentive benefits that were previously charged to expense as a result of a regulatory decision in Virginia. The increase in labor and incentive plans for year-over-year comparison for 2008 and 2007 primarily reflects increases due to incentive costs related to improved performance.
 
Employee benefits—The decrease in employee benefits expense for both year-over-year comparisons reflects a reduction in the costs of post-retirement benefit plans as well as a higher discount rate assumption used to measure the benefit obligation.
 
Uncollectible accounts—The increase for both year-over-year comparisons reflects the adjustments to the accumulated reserve balances made in 2009 and 2008 to address changes in economic conditions. The reserve in 2009 also reflects an adjustment for the effect of a customer payment relief program adopted in Maryland. The increases in fiscal years 2009 and 2008 were partially offset by the GAC included in utility net revenues.


41


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
Depreciation and Amortization.  The following table provides the key factors contributing to the changes in depreciation and amortization of the regulated utility segment between years.
 
                 
Composition of Changes in Depreciation and Amortization  
   
    Increase (Decrease)  
   
    2009
    2008
 
(In millions)   vs. 2008     vs. 2007  
   
 
Retroactive depreciation expense adjustment
  $     $ 3.9  
New depreciation rates—District of Columbia
          (2.5 )
Increase (decrease) in property, plant & equipment
    1.0       3.4  
Other
    (0.7 )     (0.5 )
Total
  $ 0.3     $ 4.3  
 
Retroactive depreciation expense adjustment—In the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, we recorded a benefit of $3.9 million applicable to the prior period from January 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006 related to a reduction in Washington Gas’s depreciation rates on fixed assets in Virginia.
 
New depreciation rates—Washington Gas implemented new depreciation rates in the District of Columbia on January 1, 2008. Refer to the section entitled “Rates and Regulatory Matters—Depreciation Study” for further discussion of depreciation matters.
 
Other Changes in Expenses.  Fiscal year 2009 general taxes increased $5.0 million over 2008 due to a $1.9 million increase in property taxes and $3.1 million increase in DC energy taxes associated with trust funds geared towards implementing energy efficiency and renewable energy programs. These DC energy taxes are offset by amounts collected in rates charged to customers. The year-over-year increase in general taxes for fiscal year 2008 compared to 2007, was primarily attributable to property taxes. Income taxes increased as a result of an increase in operating income, partially offset by a lower effective tax rate for fiscal year 2008 resulting from an adjustment to our deferred tax balances during that period.
 
   Non-Utility Operating Results
 
Our continuing non-utility operations are comprised of two business segments: (i) retail energy-marketing and (ii) design-build energy systems. Transactions that are not significant enough on a stand-alone basis to warrant treatment as an operating segment, and that do not fit into one of our three operating segments, are aggregated as “Other Activities” and included as part of non-utility operations for purposes of segment reporting (refer to Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
 
Total net income from our non-utility operations for fiscal year 2009 was $14.4 million, an increase of $11.6 million from fiscal year 2008. This comparison primarily reflects increased earnings of our retail energy-marketing segment and design build energy system segment. Total net income from our continuing non-utility operations for fiscal year 2008 was $2.8 million, compared to $18.0 million for fiscal year 2007. This comparison primarily reflects lower earnings from our retail energy-marketing segment.


42


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
Retail Energy-Marketing
 
Our retail energy-marketing subsidiary, WGEServices, was established in 1997, and sells natural gas and electricity on an unregulated, competitive basis directly to residential, commercial and industrial customers. The following table depicts the retail energy-marketing segment’s operating results along with selected statistical data.
 
                                         
Retail-Energy Marketing Financial and Statistical Data  
   
    Years Ended September 30,     Increase (Decrease)  
   
                      2009
    2008
 
    2009     2008     2007     vs. 2008     vs. 2007  
   
 
Operating Results (In millions)
                                       
Gross margins:
                                       
Operating revenues
  $ 1,192.0     $ 1,062.7     $ 1,138.4     $ 129.3     $ (75.7 )
Less: Cost of energy
    1,127.4       1,023.3       1,071.6       104.1       (48.3 )
Revenue taxes
    1.1       0.6       0.7       0.5       (0.1 )
Total gross margins
    63.5       38.8       66.1       24.7       (27.3 )
Operation expenses
    35.0       26.5       23.3       8.5       3.2  
Depreciation and amortization
    0.8       0.8       0.7             0.1  
General taxes and other assessments—other
    3.0       2.8       2.5       0.2       0.3  
Operating Income
    24.7       8.7       39.6       16.0       (30.9 )
Other income (expenses)-net
    0.1       0.1                   0.1  
Interest expense
    0.6       1.1       2.9       (0.5 )     (1.8 )
Income tax expense
    9.2       2.9       14.3       6.3       (11.4 )
Net income
  $ 15.0     $ 4.8     $ 22.4     $ 10.2     $ (17.6 )
Analysis of gross margins (In millions)
                                       
Natural gas
                                       
Realized margins
  $ 45.7     $ 26.6     $ 23.1     $ 19.1     $ 3.5  
Unrealized mark-to-market gains (losses)
    0.3       (1.7 )     (1.4 )     2.0       (0.3 )
Total gross margins—natural gas
    46.0       24.9       21.7       21.1       3.2  
Electricity
                                       
Realized margins
  $ 37.3     $ 24.7     $ 35.9     $ 12.6     $ (11.2 )
Unrealized mark-to-market gains (losses)
    (19.8 )     (10.8 )     8.5       (9.0 )     (19.3 )
Total gross margins—electricity
    17.5       13.9       44.4       3.6       (30.5 )
Total gross margins
  $ 63.5     $ 38.8     $ 66.1     $ 24.7     $ (27.3 )
Other Retail-Energy Marketing Statistics
                                       
Natural gas
                                       
Therm sales (millions of therms)
    627.4       635.0       725.5       (7.6 )     (90.5 )
Number of customers (end of period)
    151,500       133,300       140,700       18,200       (7,400 )
Electricity
                                       
Electricity sales (millions of kWhs)
    5,269.0       3,607.6       3,943.8       1,661.4       (336.2 )
Number of accounts (end of period)
    113,000       61,800       65,900       51,200       (4,100 )
 
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year 2008.  The retail energy-marketing segment reported net income of $15.0 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $10.2 million over net income of $4.8 million reported for the prior fiscal year. This comparison primarily reflects higher gross margins from the sale of natural gas and electricity. Partially offsetting these favorable margins are higher operating expenses related to marketing initiatives designed to take advantage of unique marketing opportunities that arose during the latter half of fiscal year 2009.
 
Gross margins from natural gas sales increased $21.1 million in fiscal year 2009 over the prior year, reflecting a $19.1 million increase in realized margins due to an increase in the margin per therm sold, and a favorable $2.0 million variance related to unrealized mark-to-market gains (losses) associated with energy-related derivatives.


43


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
Gross margins from electric sales increased $3.6 million in fiscal year 2009 over fiscal year 2008, reflecting increased sales volumes primarily due to a substantial number of customers added during fiscal year 2009. The increase reflects $10.5 million in realized margins and a $2.1 million revision in 2009 to estimated electric costs, partially offset by $9.0 million for unrealized mark-to-market gains (losses) associated with energy-related derivatives. Unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses are primarily attributable to changes in the fair value of certain contracts related to the purchase of energy supplies to match future retail sales commitments. These supply contracts are subject to mark-to-market treatment, while many of the corresponding retail sales commitments are not.
 
Fiscal Year 2008 vs. Fiscal Year 2007.  The retail energy-marketing segment reported net income of $4.8 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, compared to net income of $22.4 million reported for the prior fiscal year. This comparison primarily reflects lower gross margins from the sale of electricity, partially offset by higher gross margins from the sale of natural gas. Also reflected in the earnings comparison is an increase in operations expense due to higher expenses associated with uncollectible accounts and higher labor and benefit costs.
 
Gross margins from electric sales decreased in fiscal year 2008, reflecting a $19.3 million decline in unrealized mark-to-market valuations and decreased sales volumes. Unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses are primarily attributable to changes in the fair value of certain contracts related to the purchase of energy supplies to match future retail sales commitments. These supply contracts are subject to mark-to-market treatment, while the corresponding retail sales commitments are not. The decreased sales volumes are primarily due to increased competition and the loss of commercial customers and lower margins per kilowatt-hour sold primarily as a result of unfavorable weather patterns experienced early in the summer of 2008 and the unusually high margins experienced in fiscal year 2007.
 
Gross margins from natural gas sales increased in fiscal year 2008, reflecting a rise in the margin per therm sold, partially offset by a decrease in natural gas sales volumes. Also affecting gross margins from natural gas sales was a $275,000 increase in unrealized mark-to-market losses associated with energy-related derivatives.
 
Design-Build Energy Systems
 
The design-build energy systems segment reported net income of $3.1 million, $1.8 million, and $0.4 million in fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. The increases in annual net income primarily reflect increased profitability, and growth in the number and size of design-build projects.
 
Other Non-Utility Activities
 
As previously discussed, transactions that are not significant enough on a stand-alone basis to warrant treatment as an operating segment, and that do not fit into one of our three operating segments, are aggregated as “Other Activities” and included as part of non-utility operations.
 
Results for our other non-utility activities reflect net losses of $3.7 million, $3.8 million, and $4.8 million for fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. These comparisons primarily reflect lower general and administrative expenses.
 
   Other Income (Expenses)—Net
 
Other income (expenses)—net reflects income of $2.2 million, $2.5 million and $3.4 million for fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These amounts primarily comprise interest income from short-term investments that qualify as cash and cash equivalents as well as interest income associated with certain regulatory items.
 
   Interest Expense
 
Interest expense was $44.9 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, compared to $46.8 million and $48.9 million for fiscal year 2008 and 2007, respectively. Long-term debt primarily comprises unsecured MTNs issued solely by Washington Gas.


44


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
The weighted average cost of MTNs was 5.82%, 5.95% and 6.15% at September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 respectively. The following table shows the components of the changes in interest expense between years.
 
                 
Composition of Interest Expense Changes  
   
    Increase (Decrease)  
   
(In millions)   2009 vs. 2008     2008 vs. 2007  
   
 
Long-term debt
  $ 0.5     $ (0.1 )
Short-term debt
    (3.1 )     (1.1 )
Other (includes AFUDC(a))
    0.7       (0.9 )
Total
  $ (1.9 )   $ (2.1 )
(a) Represents Allowance for Funds Used During Construction.
 
For fiscal year 2009 compared to fiscal year 2008, the lower interest expense related to short-term debt reflects a decrease in the weighted average cost for these borrowings, partially offset by an increase in the average balance outstanding. The higher interest expense associated with long-term debt reflects an increase of the average balance of long-term debt outstanding mostly offset by the decrease in the embedded cost of these borrowings as a result of issuing lower-cost debt. The decrease in interest expense also reflects a decrease in interest expense associated with customer deposits, among other items.
 
For fiscal year 2008 compared to fiscal year 2007, the lower interest expense related to short-term debt reflects a decrease in the weighted average cost for these borrowings, partially offset by an increase in the average balance outstanding. The lower interest expense associated with long-term debt reflects a decrease in the embedded cost of these borrowings as a result of issuing lower-cost debt, mostly offset by a higher average balance of long-term debt outstanding. The decrease in interest expense also reflects a decrease in interest expense associated with customer deposits among other items.
 
   LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
 
   General Factors Affecting Liquidity
 
It is important for us to have access to short-term debt markets to maintain satisfactory liquidity to operate our businesses on a near-term basis. Acquisition of natural gas, electricity, pipeline capacity, and the need to finance accounts receivable and storage gas inventory are our most significant short-term financing requirements. The need for long-term capital is driven primarily by capital expenditures and maturities of long-term debt.
 
Our ability to obtain adequate and cost effective financing depends on our credit ratings as well as the liquidity of financial markets. Our credit ratings depend largely on the financial performance of our subsidiaries, and a downgrade in our current credit ratings could require us to post additional collateral with our wholesale counterparties and adversely affect our borrowing costs, as well as our access to sources of liquidity and capital. Also potentially affecting access to short-term debt capital is the nature of any restrictions that might be placed upon us, such as ratings triggers or a requirement to provide creditors with additional credit support in the event of a determination of insufficient creditworthiness. Although the credit markets tightened in the latter half of 2008 and continued into fiscal year 2009, we have maintained our ability to meet our liquidity needs at reasonable costs through: (i) the issuance of commercial paper by WGL Holdings and Washington Gas; (ii) loans made under the WGL Holdings committed bank credit facility and (iii) the issuance of debt securities by Washington Gas to support its operations. In the latter half of fiscal year 2009, the credit markets showed signs of improvements.
 
The level of our capital expenditure requirements, our financial performance and the effect of these factors on our credit ratings, as well as investor demand for our securities, affect the availability of long-term capital at reasonable costs.
 
We have a goal to maintain our common equity ratio in the mid-50% range of total consolidated capital. The level of this ratio varies during the fiscal year due to the seasonal nature of our business. This seasonality is also evident in the variability of our short-term debt balances, which are typically higher in the fall and winter months and substantially lower in the spring when a significant portion of our current assets is converted into cash at the end of the winter heating season. Accomplishing this capital structure objective and maintaining sufficient cash flow are necessary to maintain attractive credit ratings for WGL Holdings and Washington Gas, and to allow access to capital at reasonable costs. As of September 30, 2009, total consolidated capitalization, including current maturities of long-term debt and excluding notes payable, comprised 62.0% common equity, 1.6% preferred stock and 36.4% long-


45


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
term debt. Our cash flow requirements and our ability to provide satisfactory resources to meet those requirements are primarily influenced by the activities of Washington Gas and WGEServices and, to a lesser extent, other non-utility operations.
 
Our plans provide for sufficient liquidity to satisfy our financial obligations. At September 30, 2009, we did not have any restrictions on our cash balances or retained earnings that would affect the payment of common or preferred stock dividends by WGL Holdings or Washington Gas.
 
   Short-Term Cash Requirements and Related Financing
 
Washington Gas’s business is weather sensitive and seasonal, causing short-term cash requirements to vary significantly during the year. Approximately 77% of the total therms delivered in Washington Gas’s service area (excluding deliveries to two electric generation facilities) occur during the first and second fiscal quarters. Accordingly, Washington Gas typically generates more net income in the first six months of the fiscal year than it does for the entire fiscal year. During the first six months of our fiscal year, Washington Gas generates large sales volumes and its cash requirements peak when accounts receivable and unbilled revenues are at their highest levels. During the last six months of our fiscal year, after the winter heating season, Washington Gas will typically experience a seasonal net loss due to reduced demand for natural gas. During this period, many of Washington Gas’s assets are converted into cash which Washington Gas generally uses to reduce and sometimes eliminate short-term debt and to acquire storage gas for the next heating season.
 
Washington Gas and WGEServices have seasonal short-term cash requirements resulting from their need to purchase storage gas inventory in advance of the winter heating periods in which the storage gas is sold. At September 30, 2009 and 2008 Washington Gas had investment balances in gas storage of $237.7 million and $406.6 million, respectively with one additional month, October, remaining in the fill seasons. Washington Gas collects the cost of gas under cost recovery mechanisms approved by its regulators. WGEServices collects revenues that are designed to reimburse its commodity costs used to supply its retail customer contracts. Variations in the timing of cash receipts from customers under these collection methods can significantly affect short-term cash requirements. In addition, both Washington Gas and WGEServices pay their respective commodity suppliers before collecting the accounts receivable balances resulting from these sales. WGEServices derives its funding to finance these activities from short-term debt issued by WGL Holdings. Additionally, WGEServices may be required to post collateral, either parent guarantees from WGL Holdings or cash, for certain purchases.
 
Variations in the timing of collections of gas costs under Washington Gas’s gas cost recovery mechanisms can significantly affect short-term cash requirements. Washington Gas had a $64.7 million and an $11.8 million net under-collection of gas costs at September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively reflected in current assets/liabilities as gas costs due from/to customers. The under-collection in both fiscal years stemmed primarily from an excess of gas costs paid to suppliers over gas costs recovered from customers during the most recent twelve month gas cost recovery cycle ended August 31 of each year. Most of this current balance will be returned to, or collected from, customers in fiscal year 2010. Amounts under-collected or over-collected that are generated during the current gas cost recovery cycle are reflected as a regulatory asset or liability in deferred charges or deferred credits on the balance sheet until September 1st of each year, at which time the accumulated amount is transferred to gas costs due from/to customers as appropriate. At September 30, 2009 and 2008 Washington Gas reflected balances of $14.0 million and $50.8 million as deferred gas costs in deferred charges.
 
WGL Holdings and Washington Gas utilize short-term debt in the form of commercial paper or unsecured short-term bank loans to fund seasonal cash requirements. Our policy is to maintain back-up bank credit facilities in an amount equal to or greater


46


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
than our expected maximum commercial paper position. The following is a summary of our committed credit agreements at September 30, 2009.
 
                 
Committed Credit Available (In millions)  
   
    WGL Holdings     Washington Gas  
   
 
Committed credit agreements
               
Unsecured revolving credit facility, expires August 3, 2012(a)
  $ 400.0     $ 300.0  
Total committed credit agreements
    400.0       300.0  
Less: Commercial Paper
    (59.0 )     (124.8 )
Net committed credit available
  $ 341.0     $ 175.2  
(a) Both WGL Holdings and Washington Gas have the right to request extensions with the banks’ approval. WGL Holdings’ revolving credit facility permits it to borrow an additional $50 million, with the banks’ approval, for a total of $450 million. Washington Gas’s revolving credit facility permits it to borrow an additional $100 million, with the banks’ approval, for a total of $400 million.
 
WGL Holdings typically issues commercial paper to meet its financing requirements including cash collateral requirements posted to counterparties associated with WGEServices’ contracts (refer to Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information).
 
At September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, WGL Holdings and its subsidiaries had outstanding notes payable in the form of commercial paper and/or bank loans from revolving credit facilities of $183.8 million and $271.0 million, respectively. Of the outstanding notes payable balance at September 30, 2009, all borrowings were in the form of commercial paper in the amount of $59.0 million issued by WGL Holdings and $124.8 million issued by Washington Gas. At September 30, 2009 there were no outstanding bank loans from WGL Holdings’ or Washington Gas’s revolving credit facilities. Of the outstanding notes payable balance at September 30, 2008, $23.0 million and $231.0 million was commercial paper issued by WGL Holdings and Washington Gas, respectively. In addition, WGL Holdings had $17.0 million in outstanding bank loans under its revolving credit facility and there were no outstanding bank loans from Washington Gas’s revolving credit facility.
 
To manage credit risk, both Washington Gas and WGEServices may require deposits from certain customers and suppliers, which are reported as current liabilities in “Customer deposits and advance payments.” At September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, “Customer deposits and advance payments” totaled $52.9 million and $46.1 million, respectively. For both periods, most of these deposits related to customer deposits for Washington Gas.
 
For Washington Gas, deposits from customers may be refunded to the depositor-customer at various times throughout the year based on the customer’s payment habits. At the same time, other customers make new deposits that cause the balance of customer deposits to remain relatively steady. There are no restrictions on Washington Gas’s use of these customer deposits. Washington Gas pays interest to its customers on these deposits in accordance with the requirements of its regulatory commissions.
 
For WGEServices, deposits typically represent collateral for transactions with wholesale counterparties for the purchase and sale of natural gas and electricity. These deposits may be required to be repaid or increased at any time based on the current value of WGEServices’ net position with the counterparty. Currently there are no restrictions on WGEServices’ use of deposit funds and WGEServices pays interest to the counterparty on these deposits in accordance with its contractual obligations. Refer to the section entitled “Credit Risk” for a further discussion of our management of credit risk.
 
   Long-Term Cash Requirements and Related Financing
 
Our long-term cash requirements primarily depend upon the level of capital expenditures, long-term debt maturities and decisions to refinance long-term debt. Our capital expenditures primarily relate to adding new utility customers and system supply as well as maintaining the safety and reliability of Washington Gas’s distribution system (refer to the section entitled “Capital Expenditures” below).


47


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
At September 30, 2009, Washington Gas had the capacity under a shelf registration to issue up to $450.0 million of Medium Term Notes (MTNs). Washington Gas has authority from its regulators to issue other forms of debt, including private placements. The following describes MTN activity during fiscal year 2009 and 2008.
 
Fiscal Year 2009 MTN Activity.  In October 2008, Washington Gas retired $25.0 million of 5.49% MTNs. On December 5, 2008, Washington Gas issued $50.0 million of 7.46% fixed rate MTNs due December 5, 2018. Proceeds from this MTN were used by Washington Gas to replace the matured MTNs and for general corporate purposes, including funding capital expenditures and working capital needs, and repaying commercial paper. On July 9, 2009, Washington Gas retired $50.0 million of 6.92% MTNs. The maturing MTNs were repaid by the sale of commercial paper. Washington Gas maintains adequate access to capital markets to meet its liquidity requirements.
 
Fiscal Year 2008 MTN Activity.  In August 2008 Washington Gas retired $20.1 million of maturing MTNs with rates ranging from 6.51% to 6.61%. On August 26, 2008, Washington Gas issued $50.0 million of 3.61% floating rate MTNs due August 26, 2010, with a call option at 100% of par value to redeem the MTNs at any time on or after February 26, 2009. These MTNs have an interest rate which is reset quarterly based on the 3-month London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) plus 80.0 basis points. Proceeds from these MTNs were used by Washington Gas to retire the maturing MTNs and for general corporate purposes such as the funding of capital expenditures, working capital needs and the retirement of commercial paper.
 
On November 2, 2009, Washington Gas issued $50.0 million of unsecured 4.76% fixed rate notes due November 1, 2019. These notes were issued through a private placement. Proceeds from these notes were used by Washington Gas to retire existing indebtedness.
 
We are exposed to interest-rate risk associated with our debt financing costs. Washington Gas utilizes derivative instruments from time to time in order to minimize its exposure to the risk of interest-rate volatility. Refer to the section entitled “Interest-Rate Risk” for a further discussion of the management of our interest-rate risk.
 
   Security Ratings
 
The table below reflects the current credit ratings for the outstanding debt instruments of WGL Holdings and Washington Gas. Changes in credit ratings may affect WGL Holdings’ and Washington Gas’s cost of short-term and long-term debt and their access to the capital markets. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, it may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. There was no change in the ratings during the year ended September 30, 2009.
 
Credit Ratings for Outstanding Debt Instruments
                 
    WGL Holdings   Washington Gas
    Unsecured
      Unsecured
   
    Medium-Term Notes
  Commercial
  Medium-Term
  Commercial
Rating Service   (Indicative)(a)   Paper   Notes   Paper
Fitch Ratings
  A+   F1   AA−   F1+
Moody’s Investors Service
  Not Rated   Not Prime   A2   P-1
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services(b)
  AA−   A-1   AA−   A-1
(a) Indicates the ratings that may be applicable if WGL Holdings were to issue unsecured MTNs.
(b) The long-term debt rating issued by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services for WGL Holdings and Washington Gas is stable.
 
   Ratings Triggers and Certain Debt Covenants
 
WGL Holdings and Washington Gas pay fees on their credit facilities which in some cases are based on the long-term debt ratings of Washington Gas. In the event the long-term debt of Washington Gas is downgraded below certain levels, WGL Holdings and Washington Gas would be required to pay higher fees. There are five different levels of fees. The credit facility for WGL Holdings defines its applicable fee level as one level below the level applicable to Washington Gas. Under the terms of the credit facilities, the fees based on the long-term debt credit ratings range from four basis points to nineteen basis points.


48


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
Under the terms of WGL Holdings’ and Washington Gas’s credit agreements, the ratio of consolidated financial indebtedness to consolidated total capitalization cannot exceed 0.65 to 1.0 (65.0%). In addition, WGL Holdings and Washington Gas are required to inform lenders of changes in corporate existence, financial conditions, litigation and environmental warranties that might have a material adverse effect. The failure to inform the lenders’ agent of changes in these areas deemed material in nature might constitute default under the agreements. Additionally, WGL Holdings’ or Washington Gas’s failure to pay principal or interest when due on any of its other indebtedness may be deemed a default under our credit agreements. A default, if not remedied, may lead to a suspension of further loans and/or acceleration in which obligations become immediately due and payable. At September 30, 2009, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our revolving credit facilities.
 
For certain of Washington Gas’s natural gas purchase and pipeline capacity agreements, if the long-term debt of Washington Gas is downgraded to or below the lower of a BBB- rating by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services or a Baa3 rating by Moody’s Investors Service, or if Washington Gas is deemed by a counterparty not to be creditworthy, then the counterparty may withhold service or deliveries, or may require additional credit support. For certain other agreements, if the counterparty’s credit exposure to Washington Gas exceeds a contractually defined threshold amount, or if Washington Gas’s credit rating declines, then the counterparty may require additional credit support. At September 30, 2009, Washington Gas would not be required to supply additional credit support by these arrangements if its long-term debt rating were to be downgraded one rating level.
 
WGL Holdings has guaranteed payments for certain purchases of natural gas and electricity on behalf of its wholly-owned subsidiary, WGEServices (refer to “Contractual Obligations, Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Other Commercial Commitments” for a further discussion of these guarantees). If the credit rating of WGL Holdings declines, WGEServices may be required to provide additional credit support for these purchase contracts. At September 30, 2009, WGEServices would be required to provide $7.8 million in additional credit support for these arrangements if the long-term debt rating of WGL Holdings were to be downgraded one rating level.
 
   Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
 
The primary drivers for our operating cash flows are cash payments received from natural gas and electricity customers, offset by our payments for natural gas and electricity costs, operation and maintenance expenses, taxes and interest costs.
 
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $307.1 million, $62.0 million and $213.3 million for fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities reflects net income applicable to common stock, as adjusted for non-cash earnings and charges, as well as changes in working capital. Certain changes in working capital from September 30, 2008 to September 30, 2009 are described below.
 
  •   Accounts receivable and unbilled revenues increased $30.6 million from September 30, 2008 primarily due to increased sales volumes associated with Washington Gas’s asset optimization program.
 
  •   Storage gas inventory cost levels decreased $168.9 million from September 30, 2008 primarily due to lower gas prices of volumes in storage.
 
  •   Gas costs and other regulatory assets increased $48.0 million from September 30, 2008 due to an increase in under-collection of gas costs during the year and an increase in unbilled gas costs.
 
  •   Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities decreased $34.5 million, largely attributable to a decrease in the cost of the natural gas purchased.
 
  •   Other prepayments increased $52.5 million from September 30, 2008 due to an increase in collateral receivables for transactions with wholesale counterparties for the purchase of energy for our retail-energy marketing segment. This increase in collateral reflects lower market prices for energy, compared to the contracted purchase price of energy supplies.
 
  •   Other current liabilities decreased $24.7 million primarily due to unrealized fair value gains associated with energy-related derivatives for both Washington Gas and WGEServices.
 
  •   Deferred purchased gas costs—net decreased $36.8 million primarily due to a decrease in the under-collection of gas costs from September 30, 2008.


49


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
 
   Cash Flows Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
 
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities totaled $(166.5) million, $74.3 million and $(47.2) million for fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. During fiscal year 2009, we decreased our notes payable by a net amount of $87.1 million due to decreased working capital requirements driven principally by lower storage gas inventory costs, a dividend payment on common stock totaling $72.4 million, partially offset by $5.1 million in cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock pursuant to our stock-based compensation plan. Additionally during fiscal year 2009, we retired $75.0 million of MTNs and issued $50.0 million of lower-cost MTNs (refer to the section entitled “Long-Term Cash Requirements and Related Financing”).
 
During fiscal year 2008, we increased our notes payable by a net amount of $86.7 million due to increased working capital requirements, principally to fund higher storage gas inventory costs at Washington Gas. This increase in notes payable was partially offset by dividend payments on common stock totaling $69.1 million, as well as $14.1 million in cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock pursuant to our stock-based compensation plan. Additionally during fiscal year 2008, we retired $20.1 million of MTNs and issued $50.0 million of lower-cost MTNs.
 
Cash flows used in financing activities for fiscal year 2007 was driven by our dividend payments on common stock totaling $66.8 million, partially offset by $11.7 million in cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock pursuant to our stock-based compensation plan.
 
The following table reflects the issuances and retirements of long-term debt that occurred during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007 (also refer to Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
 
                                                 
Long-Term Debt Activity  
   
    2009     2008     2007  
   
(In millions)   Interest Rate     Amount     Interest Rate     Amount     Interest Rate     Amount  
 
 
 
Medium-term notes
                                               
Issued(a)
    7.46 %   $ 50.0       3.61 %   $ 50.0           $  
Retired
    5.49 – 6.92 %     (75.0 )     6.51 – 6.61 %     (20.1 )            
Other financing
                                               
Issued(b)
    5.95 – 6.98 %     15.3       5.63 %     13.3       5.57 %     1.4  
Retired(c)
    4.76 – 7.53 %     (25.5 )     4.76 – 9.00 %     (1.0 )     4.76 – 9.00 %     (1.0 )
Other activity
          (0.1 )                        
Total
          $ (35.3 )           $ 42.2             $ 0.4  
(a) Interest rate resets quarterly on November, February, May, and August 26 of each year until maturity.
(b) Includes the non-cash issuances of project debt financing of $1.4 million, $13.3 million, and $14.9 million for fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
(c) Includes the non-cash extinguishments of project debt financing of $24.5 million for fiscal year 2009.
 
   Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
 
Net cash flows used in investing activities totaled $138.9 million, $135.0 million and $165.6 million during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, $134.2 million, $133.6 million and $162.0 million, respectively, of cash was utilized for capital expenditures made on behalf of Washington Gas.


50


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
   Capital Expenditures
 
The following table depicts our actual capital expenditures for fiscal years 2007, 2008 and 2009, and projected capital expenditures for fiscal years 2010 through 2014. Our capital expenditure program includes investments to extend service to new areas, and to ensure safe, reliable and improved service.
 
                                                                         
Capital Expenditures  
   
    Actual     Projected  
(In millions)   2007     2008     2009     2010     2011     2012     2013     2014     Total  
   
 
New business
  $ 44.9     $ 45.8     $ 28.8     $ 48.2     $ 51.4     $ 55.4     $ 62.5     $ 67.7     $ 285.2  
Replacements
                                                                       
Rehabilitation project
    30.8       8.1                                            
Other
    33.8       38.0       57.4       45.0       41.6       41.3       43.2       42.7       213.8  
LNG storage facility
    0.3       0.1       0.1       8.6       56.9       48.7       35.8       0.7       150.7  
SOC redevelopment project
                      13.5       34.1       30.7                   78.3  
Other
    48.3       39.4       51.2       47.2       36.9       26.1       33.3       24.8       168.3  
Total-accrual basis(a)
  $ 158.1     $ 131.4     $ 137.5     $ 162.5     $ 220.9     $ 202.2     $ 174.8     $ 135.9     $ 896.3  
Cash basis adjustments
    6.4       3.6       1.4                                      
Total-cash basis
  $ 164.5     $ 135.0     $ 138.9     $ 162.5     $ 220.9     $ 202.2     $ 174.8     $ 135.9     $ 896.3  
(a) Excludes Allowance for Funds Used During Construction and prepayments associated with capital projects. Includes accruals for capital expenditures and other non-cash additions.
 
The 2010 to 2014 projected periods include $285.2 million for continued growth to serve new customers, and $213.8 million primarily related to the replacement and betterment of existing capacity. Additionally, the projected period contains capital expenditures to construct a necessary, new source of peak day capacity within the boundaries of the natural gas distribution system to support customer growth and pressure requirements on the entire natural gas distribution system. Specifically, these estimated expenditures are expected to be used for the construction of a one billion cubic foot LNG storage facility on the land historically used for storage facilities by Washington Gas in Chillum, Maryland (refer to the section entitled “Chillum LNG Facility”). Projected expenditures also reflect $78.3 million for the development of new facilities at the Springfield Operations Center (SOC) and $168.3 million of other expenditures, which include general plant.
 
   CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND OTHER COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
 
   Contractual Obligations
 
WGL Holdings and Washington Gas have certain contractual obligations that extend beyond fiscal year 2009. These commitments include long-term debt, lease obligations and unconditional purchase obligations for pipeline capacity, transportation and storage services, and certain natural gas and electricity commodity commitments. The estimated obligations as of September 30, 2009 for future fiscal years are shown below.
 


51


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
                                                         
Estimated Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments  
   
    Years Ended September 30,  
   
(In millions)   Total     2010     2011     2012     2013     2014     Thereafter  
   
 
Pipeline and storage contracts(a)
  $ 2,402.7     $ 162.1     $ 159.8     $ 159.7     $ 161.8     $ 183.6     $ 1,575.7  
Medium-term notes(b)
    639.0       82.5       30.0       77.0             67.0       382.5  
Other long-term debt(b)
    0.3       0.1       0.1       0.1                    
Interest expense(c)
    415.7       36.2       32.7       29.3       27.5       25.8       264.2  
Gas purchase commitments—Washington Gas(d)
    497.9       113.6       40.7       55.3       55.2       55.7       177.4  
Gas purchase commitments—WGEServices(e)
    536.8       306.4       152.5       69.8       8.1              
Electric purchase commitments(f)
    885.8       474.7       273.0       116.3       21.1       0.7        
Operating leases
    36.7       4.2       4.3       4.4       4.4       4.2       15.2  
Business Process Outsourcing(g)
    259.5       40.8       34.8       33.9       30.8       30.5       88.7  
Other long-term commitments(h)
    10.4       5.2       4.0       0.3       0.3       0.1       0.5  
Total
  $ 5,684.8     $ 1,225.8     $ 731.9     $ 546.1     $ 309.2     $ 367.6     $ 2,504.2  
(a) Represents minimum payments under natural gas transportation, storage and peaking contracts which have expiration dates through fiscal year 2029. Additionally, includes minimum payments for WGEServices pipeline contracts.
 
(b) Represents scheduled repayment of principal including the assumed exercise of a put option by the debt holders of $8.5 million in 2010. Excludes $5.1 million in debt that is anticipated to be a non-cash extinguishment of project debt financing (refer to the section entitled “Construction Project Financing”).
 
(c) Represents the scheduled interest payments associated with MTNs and other long-term debt.
 
(d) Includes short-term commitments to purchase fixed volumes of natural gas, as well as long-term gas purchase commitments that contain fixed volume purchase requirements. Cost estimates are based on both forward market prices and option premiums for fixed volume purchases under these purchase commitments.
 
(e) Represents commitments based on a combination of market prices at September 30, 2009 and fixed price as well as index priced contract commitments for natural gas delivered to various city gate stations, including the cost of transportation to that point, which is bundled in the purchase price.
 
(f) Represents electric purchase commitments which are based on existing fixed price and fixed volume contracts. Also includes $6.5 million related to renewable energy credits.
 
(g) Represents fixed costs to the service provider related to the 10-year contract for business process outsourcing. These payments do not reflect potential inflationary adjustments included in the contract. Including these inflationary adjustments, required payments to the service provider could total $306.5 million.
 
(h) Includes certain information technology service contracts and committed payments related to certain environmental response costs.
 
The table above reflects fixed and variable obligations. Certain of these estimates reflect likely purchases under various contracts, and may differ from minimum future contractual commitments disclosed in Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
For commitments related to Washington Gas’s pension and post-retirement benefit plans, during fiscal year 2010, Washington Gas does not expect to make any contributions to its qualified, trusteed, employee-non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering all active and vested former employees of Washington Gas. Washington Gas expects to make payments totaling $10.2 million in fiscal year 2010 on behalf of participants in our non-funded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. Washington Gas also expects to contribute $19.0 million to our health and life insurance benefit plans on behalf of retirees during fiscal year 2010. For a further discussion of our pension and post-retirement benefit plans, refer to Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
   Construction Project Financing
 
To fund certain of its construction projects, Washington Gas enters into financing arrangements with third party lenders. As part of these financing arrangements, Washington Gas’s customers agree to make principal and interest payments over a period of time, typically beginning after the projects are completed. Washington Gas assigns these customer payment streams to the lender. As the lender funds the construction project, Washington Gas establishes a note receivable representing its customers’ obligations to remit principal and interest and a long-term note payable to the lender. When these projects are formally “accepted” by the customer as completed, Washington Gas transfers the ownership of the note receivable to the lender and removes both the note receivable and the long-term financing from its financial statements. As of September 30, 2009, work on these construction projects that was not completed or accepted by customers was valued at $5.1 million, which is recorded on the balance sheet as a note receivable in

52


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
“Deferred Charges and Other Assets—Other” with the corresponding long-term obligation to the lender in “Long-term debt.” At any time before these contracts are accepted by the customer, should there be a contract default, such as, among other things, a delay in completing the project, the lender may call on Washington Gas to fund the unpaid principal in exchange for which Washington Gas would receive the right to the stream of payments from the customer. Once the project is accepted by the customer, the lender will have no recourse against Washington Gas related to this long-term debt.
 
   Financial Guarantees
 
WGL Holdings has guaranteed payments primarily for certain purchases of natural gas and electricity on behalf of the retail energy-marketing segment. At September 30, 2009, these guarantees totaled $539.5 million. The amount of such guarantees is periodically adjusted to reflect changes in the level of financial exposure related to these purchase commitments. We also receive financial guarantees or other collateral from suppliers when required by our credit policy (refer to the section entitled “Credit Risk” for a further discussion of our credit policy). WGL Holdings also issued guarantees totaling $3.0 million at September 30, 2009 that were made on behalf of certain of our non-utility subsidiaries associated with their banking transactions. For all of its financial guarantees, WGL Holdings may cancel any or all future obligations imposed by the guarantees upon written notice to the counterparty, but WGL Holdings would continue to be responsible for the obligations that had been created under the guarantees prior to the effective date of the cancellation.
 
   Chillum LNG Facility
 
Washington Gas plans to construct a one billion cubic foot LNG storage facility on the land historically used for natural gas storage facilities by Washington Gas in Chillum, Maryland, to meet its customers’ forecasted peak demand for natural gas. The new storage facility is currently expected to be completed and in service by the 2013-2014 winter heating season at an estimated cost of $159 million, subject to certain zoning and other legal challenges.
 
On October 30, 2006, the District Council of Prince George’s County, Maryland denied Washington Gas’s application for a special exception related to its proposed construction of the LNG peaking plant because it believes that current zoning restrictions prohibit such construction. Washington Gas appealed this decision to the Prince George’s County Circuit Court (the Circuit Court) on November 22, 2006; however, the case was subsequently sent back to the administrative process by the Circuit Court. On April 16, 2008, Washington Gas filed a Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief with the United States District Court for the District of Maryland (the U.S. District Court) seeking to clarify the role of the local jurisdiction by affirming all local laws relating to safety and location of the facility are preempted by Federal and State law. A ruling by the U.S. District Court is pending.
 
On March 19, 2009, the PSC of MD ordered that evidentiary proceedings be opened for the purpose of reviewing Washington Gas’s most recent gas procurement plan including the role the Chillum facility plays in meeting current and future customers’ annual and seasonal natural gas requirements. The Company revised its projected service date for the facility in a public notice made on August 7, 2009. The Company has requested that the proceeding be held in abeyance until the Company’s next gas procurement plan is filed in November, 2009. Refer to the section entitled “Rates and Regulatory Matters—Maryland Jurisdiction—Review of the Company’s 2009-2013 Gas Portfolio Plan” for a further discussion of this issue. Washington Gas must begin construction of the storage facility in the summer of 2010 in order for the Chillum Facility to be completed and in service by the 2013-2014 winter heating season. Until the legal challenges are resolved and the LNG plant is constructed, Washington Gas has planned for alternative sources of supply to meet its customers’ peak day requirements. These plans include capital expenditures related to infrastructure improvements which contribute to providing for adequate system performance based on projected needs.
 
   Operating Issues Related To Cove Point Natural Gas Supply
 
In late fiscal year 2003, Dominion reactivated its Cove Point LNG terminal. A large portion of the gas delivered from the Cove Point LNG terminal comes to the Washington Gas service territory as a result of the Company’s multiple delivery points on the Cove Point pipeline and from three interstate natural gas transmission pipelines also interconnected with the Cove Point pipeline, each of which serve Washington Gas from delivery points downstream of its Cove Point pipeline interconnect. The composition of the vaporized LNG received from the Cove Point LNG terminal resulted in increased leaks in mechanical couplings on the portion of our distribution system in Prince George’s County, Maryland that directly receives the Cove Point gas. The vaporized Cove Point gas contains a lower concentration of heavy hydrocarbons (HHCs) than non-liquefied natural gas, and caused the seals on those mechanical couplings to shrink and to leak. Independent laboratory tests performed on behalf of Washington Gas have shown that, in


53


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
a laboratory environment, the injection of HHCs into the type of gas coming from the Cove Point LNG terminal can be effective in re-swelling the seals in couplings which increases their sealing force and in turn, reduces the propensity for the affected couplings to leak.
 
Through a pipeline replacement project and the construction of a HHC injection facility at the largest gate station that exclusively receives gas from the Cove Point terminal, Washington Gas has reduced the occurrence of new coupling leaks in this area of the distribution system. A recent expansion of the physical capacity of the Cove Point terminal could result in a substantial increase in the receipt of Cove Point gas into additional portions of Washington Gas’s distribution system as greater volumes of Cove Point gas are introduced into other downstream pipelines that provide service to Washington Gas. Based upon engineering and flow studies and our experience, this increase in the receipt of Cove Point gas is likely to result in a significantly greater number of leaks in other parts of Washington Gas’s distribution system, unless our efforts to mitigate these additional leaks are successful. Washington Gas is attempting to mitigate this anticipated increase in leaks through: (i) pipeline replacement programs; (ii) the operation of three HHC injection facilities; (iii) isolating its interstate pipeline receipt points and limiting the amount of gas received, where possible, from pipelines that transport Cove Point gas; (iv) blending, where possible, the Cove Point gas with other supplies of natural gas from within the continental United States and (v) continued efforts before the FERC to condition incremental increases in deliveries from the Cove Point terminal on the appropriate resolution of safety concerns consistent with the public interest.
 
Washington Gas installed and operates HHC injection facilities at three gate stations. Assuming current gas flow patterns with the current pipeline supply configurations, the strategic placement of the three operational HHC injection facilities will inject HHCs into the natural gas supplied to over 95% of the pipelines that contain mechanical couplings within our distribution system. Washington Gas has been granted recovery for a portion of these costs allocable to Virginia and Maryland. Additionally, Washington Gas will seek recovery of the costs of these facilities allocable to the District of Columbia in a future base rate proceeding. Washington Gas expects the cost of these facilities to be recoverable in all jurisdictions.
 
The estimated cost of these facilities does not include the cost of the HHCs injected into the gas stream at the gate stations. We have been granted cost recovery for the majority of these costs in Virginia and Maryland. On October 2, 2009, Washington Gas and the District of Columbia Office of the People’s Counsel (DC OPC) filed a Joint Motion for Approval of Unanimous Agreement of Stipulation and Full Settlement with the PSC of DC which, if approved, will provide for full recovery of the HHC commodity costs in the District of Columbia (refer to the section entitled “Rates and Regulatory Matters”).
 
Washington Gas is replacing or remediating selected mechanically coupled pipelines within the areas of the distribution system that may receive high concentrations of Cove Point gas, but that will not receive HHC injections. Washington Gas has also planned for additional replacement of mechanically coupled pipeline in other areas of its distribution system. In total, the current estimated cost of planned mechanical coupling remediation and replacement work over the next three years is $39.7 million which includes $9.0 million as part of a planned mechanically coupled pipe replacement program approved by the Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC of VA) as part of a settlement of a Virginia rate case. The October 2, 2009 settlement filed in the District of Columbia includes a targeted mechanically coupled pipe replacement and encapsulation program which will cost no more than $28.0 million and is expected to take approximately seven years to complete. Rate recovery of the expenditures is provided for in the settlement.
 
Washington Gas continues to gather and evaluate field and laboratory evidence to determine the efficacy of HHC injections of the Cove Point gas in preventing additional leaks or impeding the rate at which additional leaks may occur in the gas distribution system if expanded volumes from the Cove Point terminal are introduced. In a report filed with the PSC of MD on June 30, 2008, Washington Gas reported a notable increase in leaks in mechanical couplings in a portion of its distribution system in Virginia where Cove Point gas injected with HHCs was recently introduced for a short period of time. Although this increase in leaks was significantly less than the increase experienced in the affected area of Prince George’s County, Maryland, the injection of HHCs into the Cove Point gas did not reduce the occurrence of coupling leaks to an acceptable level that would allow Washington Gas to safely accommodate the increased deliveries of revaporized LNG anticipated with the expansion of the Cove Point terminal. If we are unable to implement a satisfactory solution on a timely basis, additional operating expenses and capital expenditures may be necessary to contend with leaks that may accompany the receipt of increased volumes of vaporized LNG from the Cove Point terminal into Washington Gas’s distribution system. Such additional operating expenses and capital expenditures may not be timely enough to mitigate the challenges posed by increased volumes of Cove Point gas, potentially resulting in leakage from mechanical couplings at a rate that could compromise the safety of our distribution system. Additional legal or regulatory remedies may be necessary to protect


54


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
the Washington Gas distribution system and its customers from the adverse effects of unblended vaporized LNG (refer to the section entitled “Request for FERC Action” below for a further discussion).
 
Notwithstanding Washington Gas’s recovery through local regulatory commission action of costs related to the construction of the injection facilities and HHC commodity costs, Washington Gas is pursuing remedies to keep its customers from having to pay more than their appropriate share of the costs of the remediation to maintain the safety of the Washington Gas distribution system.
 
Request for FERC Action Regarding Cove Point
 
In November 2005, Washington Gas requested the FERC to invoke its authority to require Dominion to demonstrate that the increased volumes of the Cove Point gas resulting from the expansion would flow safely through the Washington Gas distribution system and would be consistent with the public interest. Washington Gas specifically requested that the proposed expansion of the Cove Point LNG terminal be denied until Dominion has shown that the Cove Point gas: (i) is of such quality that it is fully interchangeable with the domestically produced natural gas historically received by Washington Gas and (ii) will not cause harm to its customers or to the infrastructure of Washington Gas’s distribution system.
 
On June 16, 2006, the FERC issued an order authorizing Dominion’s request to expand the capacity and output of its Cove Point LNG terminal and, thereby, denying Washington Gas’s request to require Dominion to demonstrate the safety of the Cove Point gas flowing through the Washington Gas distribution system. Washington Gas, the PSC of MD, Keyspan Corporation, the Maryland Office of People’s Counsel (MD OPC) and other organizations all filed Requests for Rehearing with the FERC to seek modification of the FERC’s June 16, 2006 order. These requests were all rejected by the FERC. On January 26, 2007, Washington Gas filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (the Court of Appeals). Washington Gas requested the Court of Appeals to reverse the June 16, 2006 FERC order that authorized the Cove Point expansion, as well as a January 4, 2007 FERC order that denied Washington Gas’s rehearing request.
 
On July 18, 2008, the Court of Appeals issued an opinion vacating the FERC orders to the extent they approve the expansion. The opinion remanded the case to the FERC to address whether the expansion can go forward without causing unsafe leakage on Washington Gas Light Company’s distribution system.
 
Although Washington Gas agrees with the portion of the Court of Appeals decision that states the FERC failed to address adequately the future safety concerns associated with increased deliveries of LNG into its system, Washington Gas does not agree with all of the findings of the Court of Appeals, including conclusions related to the cause of the leaks, and on September 2, 2008 filed a request for rehearing with the Court of Appeals. This request has been denied. The FERC held a technical conference on August 14, 2008 “to discuss the nature and progress of remedial measures taken to date, as well as the need and benefit of any other remedial measures that might be taken by WGL and Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP so that WGL’s system can safely accommodate the increased amounts of regasified LNG from Cove Point’s LNG terminal.” Washington Gas filed initial Post Technical Conference Comments on August 19, 2008 and reply Post Technical Conference Comments on August 22, 2008. On October 7, 2008, the FERC issued its reauthorization of the expansion of the Cove Point terminal, allowing construction to continue; however, the FERC limited the amount of vaporized LNG that may flow from the Cove Point terminal into the Columbia Gas Transmission pipeline and ultimately into the distribution system of Washington Gas. On November 6, 2008, Washington Gas filed a Request for Rehearing with the FERC, citing numerous factual and legal errors in the October 7, 2008 reauthorization. The reauthorization fails to adequately address future safety concerns as directed by the Court of Appeals. Although this reauthorization limited the amount of vaporized LNG that may flow from the Cove Point terminal into Washington Gas’s distribution system through the Columbia Gas Transmission pipeline, this limited amount far exceeds any amount of Cove Point gas that has been received by Columbia Gas Transmission to date. On January 15, 2009, the FERC issued an order denying Washington Gas’s request for rehearing and affirmed its reauthorization of the expansion of the Cove Point terminal. On February 13, 2009, Washington Gas filed a request with the FERC for an emergency stay of the effectiveness of the orders the FERC issued on October 7, 2008 and January 15, 2009. On March 19, 2009, the FERC denied Washington Gas’s request for a stay. On March 13, 2009, Washington Gas filed a Petition for Review in the Court of Appeals of the FERC’s Order on Remand issued on October 7, 2008, and its Order on Rehearing of the October 7, 2008 Order, issued January 15, 2009, that established a cap on the volume of LNG that could be delivered to the Columbia Gas interconnection with the Cove Point pipeline. The October 2008 decision did not fully address the concerns raised earlier by the Court of Appeals—that the Cove Point expansion should not proceed until FERC addressed the safety concerns raised by Washington Gas. On July 20, 2009 the Court of Appeals issued an Order setting a briefing schedule with final briefs due on January 27, 2010. The date for oral argument has not been set.


55


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
Washington Gas is committed to maintaining the safety of its distribution system for its customers and will continue to oppose the authorization of the Cove Point expansion until a long-term solution is determined that can address the safety issues associated with the expanded flows of vaporized LNG from the Cove Point terminal that flow into the interstate pipeline system that also serves Washington Gas.
 
   Additional LNG Supply from the Elba Island Expansion
 
On September 20, 2007, the FERC approved the expansion of the existing Elba Island LNG receiving terminal near Savannah, Georgia owned by Southern LNG, Inc. (Southern LNG). Concurrent with this approval, the FERC granted Southern LNG certificate authority to construct and operate a new interstate natural gas pipeline to transport regasified LNG from the Elba Island facility to Georgia and South Carolina. On March 31, 2009, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation (Transco) filed with FERC for authority to construct and operate interconnections in Georgia and South Carolina between the Elba Island pipeline and the Transco pipeline. This expansion and the requested interconnections, expected to be completed in 2010, may result in the receipt of gas from the Elba Island facility into portions of Washington Gas’s distribution system. The gas from the Elba Island facility is expected to contain a lower concentration of HHCs than domestically produced natural gas, and may result in increased leaks in Washington Gas’s distribution system. Washington Gas is currently evaluating the potential effect of the introduction of Elba Island gas into our distribution system, and is evaluating potential preventative and remedial measures to mitigate any possible increase in leaks in the effected portions of Washington Gas’s distribution system that may receive Elba Island gas. Washington Gas has filed with FERC to challenge Transco’s interconnection request and has conditioned our support of such interconnection on Transco maintaining minimum HHC levels in the blended gas that would be delivered into the Washington Gas system. On September 17, 2009, the FERC issued an Order granting Transco’s request for authorization to construct the interconnections between the Elba Island facility and the Transco pipeline. The FERC stated that Washington Gas had not raised any new evidence to support claims of damage to the distribution system and that the Cove Point orders had addressed the same issues. FERC also found it was unreasonable to impose restrictions on a long distance pipeline to accommodate the Washington Gas system. On October 19, 2009, Washington Gas filed a rehearing request of the FERC Order with the FERC.
 
Washington Gas welcomes the opportunity to work with Dominion as well as the shippers who bring LNG into the Cove Point terminal and the interstate pipelines that deliver gas to Washington Gas in order to achieve and implement an appropriate solution to the issue of gas quality affecting its distribution system.
 
   CREDIT RISK
 
   Wholesale Credit Risk
 
Certain wholesale suppliers that sell natural gas to both Washington Gas and WGEServices either have relatively low credit ratings or are not rated by major credit rating agencies.
 
Washington Gas enters into transactions with wholesale counterparties for the purpose of meeting firm ratepayer commitments, to optimize the value of its long-term capacity assets, and for hedging natural gas costs. In the event of a supplier’s failure to deliver contracted volumes of gas or fulfill its payment obligations, Washington Gas may incur losses that would typically be passed through to its sales customers under the purchased gas cost adjustment mechanisms. Washington Gas may be at risk for financial loss to the extent these losses are not passed through to its customers. To manage these various credit risks, Washington Gas has a credit policy in place that is designed to mitigate these credit risks through a requirement for credit enhancements including, but not limited to, letters of credit, parent guarantees and cash collateral when deemed necessary. In accordance with this policy, Washington Gas has obtained credit enhancements from certain of its counterparties. Additionally, for certain counterparties or their guarantors that meet this policy’s credit worthiness criteria, Washington Gas grants unsecured credit which is continuously monitored.
 
For WGEServices, depending on the ability of wholesale counterparties to deliver natural gas or electricity under existing contracts, WGEServices could be financially exposed for the difference between the price at which WGEServices has contracted to buy these commodities and their replacement cost from another supplier. To the extent that WGEServices sells natural gas to these wholesale counterparties, WGEServices may be exposed to payment risk if WGEServices is in a net receivable position. Additionally, WGEServices enters into contracts with third parties to hedge the costs of natural gas and electricity. Depending on the ability of the third parties to fulfill their commitments, WGEServices could be at risk for financial loss. WGEServices has an existing credit policy that is designed to mitigate credit risks through a requirement for credit enhancements including, but not limited to, letters of credit,


56


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
parent guarantees and cash collateral when deemed necessary. In accordance with this policy, WGEServices has obtained credit enhancements from certain of its counterparties. If certain counterparties or their guarantors meet the policy’s credit worthiness criteria, WGEServices grants unsecured credit to those counterparties or their guarantors. The credit worthiness of all counterparties is continuously monitored.
 
WGEServices is also subject to the credit policy requirements of their counterparties which under certain circumstances require similar credit enhancements from WGEServices under these contracts. WGEServices credit risks may extend beyond the price or payment risk outlined above to the extent that cash collateral has been provided to the counterparty. At September 30, 2009, WGEServices had provided $39.7 million in cash collateral to supplier counterparties.
 
The following table provides information on our credit exposure, net of collateral, to wholesale counterparties as of September 30, 2009 for both Washington Gas and WGEServices, separately.          
 
                                         
Credit Exposure to Wholesale Counterparties (In millions )  
   
    Exposure
    Offsetting
          Number of
    Net Exposure of
 
    Before Credit
    Credit Collateral
    Net
    Counterparties
    Counterparties
 
Rating(a)   Collateral(b)     Held(c)     Exposure     Greater Than 10%(d)     Greater Than 10%  
   
 
Washington Gas
                                       
Investment Grade
  $ 17.7     $     $ 17.7       4     $ 12.1  
Non-Investment Grade
                             
No External Ratings
    3.0       0.4       2.6              
WGEServices
                                       
Investment Grade
  $ 0.4     $     $ 0.4       1     $ 0.4  
Non-Investment Grade
                             
No External Ratings
    0.4             0.4       1        
(a) Included in “Investment Grade” are counterparties with a minimum Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s Investor Service rating of BBB- or Baa3, respectively. If a counterparty has provided a guarantee by a higher-rated entity (e.g., its parent), the guarantor’s rating is used in this table.
 
(b) Includes the net of all open positions on energy-related derivatives subject to mark-to-market accounting requirements, the net receivable/payable for realized transactions and net open positions for contracts designated as normal purchases and normal sales and not recorded on our balance sheet. Amounts due from counterparties are offset by liabilities payable to those counterparties to the extent that legally enforceable netting arrangements are in place.
 
(c) Represents cash deposits and letters of credit received from counterparties, not adjusted for probability of default.
 
(d) Using a percentage of the net exposure.
 
   Retail Credit Risk
 
Washington Gas is exposed to the risk of non-payment of utility bills by certain of its customers. To manage this customer credit risk, Washington Gas may require cash deposits from its high risk customers to cover payment of their bills until the requirements for the deposit refunds are met.
 
WGEServices is also exposed to the risk of non-payment of invoiced sales by its retail customers. WGEServices manages this risk by evaluating the credit quality of new customers as well as by monitoring collections from existing customers. To the extent necessary, WGEServices can obtain collateral from, or terminate service to, its existing customers based on credit quality criteria.
 
   MARKET RISK
 
We are exposed to various forms of market risk including commodity price risk, weather risk and interest-rate risk. The following discussion describes these risks and our management of them.
 
   Price Risk Related to the Regulated Utility Segment
 
Washington Gas faces price risk associated with the purchase of natural gas. Washington Gas generally recovers the cost of the natural gas to serve customers through gas cost recovery mechanisms as approved in jurisdictional tariffs; therefore a change in the


57


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
price of natural gas generally has no direct effect on Washington Gas’s net income. However, Washington Gas is responsible for following competitive and reasonable practices in purchasing natural gas for its customers.
 
To manage price risk associated with its natural gas supply to its firm customers, Washington Gas: (i) actively manages its gas supply portfolio to balance sales and delivery obligations; (ii)  injects natural gas into storage during the summer months when prices are historically lower, and withdraws that gas during the winter heating season when prices are historically higher and (iii)  enters into hedging contracts and other contracts that qualify as derivative instruments related to the sale and purchase of natural gas.
 
Washington Gas has specific regulatory approval in the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia to use forward contracts and, except in Maryland, option contracts to hedge against potential price volatility for a limited portion of its natural gas purchases for firm customers. Specifically, Washington Gas has approval to: (i) buy gas in advance using forward contracts; (ii)  purchase call options that lock in a maximum price when Washington Gas is ready to buy gas and (iii) use a combination of put and call options to limit price exposure within an acceptable range. Regulatory approval for Virginia is permanent. The regulatory approval in the District of Columbia is pursuant to a pilot program, and Washington Gas will be seeking to continue this program. The current Maryland authority stems from March 2009 Orders directing Washington Gas to hedge 40% of its summer storage fill volumes at or below a certain price, but precluded the use of options. Additionally, pursuant to a three-year pilot program that expired in the latter half of 2008, Washington Gas had specific regulatory approval in Maryland and Virginia to hedge the cost of natural gas purchased for storage using financial transactions in the form of forwards, swaps and option contracts. Washington Gas has filed for the renewal of the program in Maryland and Virginia. Additionally, pursuant to a three-year pilot program in the District of Columbia, Washington Gas has the ability to hedge the cost of natural gas for storage.
 
Washington Gas also executes commodity-related physical and financial contracts in the form of forwards, swaps and option contracts as part of an asset optimization program that is managed by its internal staff. These transactions are accounted for as derivatives. Under this program, Washington Gas realizes value from its long-term natural gas transportation and storage capacity resources when not fully being used to serve utility customers. Regulatory sharing mechanisms in all three jurisdictions allow the profit from these transactions to be shared between Washington Gas’s customers and shareholders.
 
The following two tables summarize the changes in the fair value of our net assets (liabilities) associated with the regulated utility segment’s energy-related derivatives during the twelve months ended September 30, 2009:
 
         
Regulated Utility Segment
 
Changes in Fair Value of Energy-Related Derivatives  
   
(In millions)      
 
 
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2008
  $ (35.6 )
Net fair value of contracts entered into during the period
    4.5  
Other changes in net fair value
    12.4  
Realized net settlement of derivatives
    24.3  
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2009
  $ 5.6  
 
         
Regulated Utility Segment
 
Roll Forward of Energy-Related Derivatives  
   
(In millions)      
 
 
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2008
  $ (35.6 )
Recorded to income
    12.1  
Recorded to regulatory assets/liabilities
    3.2  
Net option premium payments
    1.6  
Realized net settlement of derivatives
    24.3  
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2009
  $ 5.6  


58


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
The maturity dates of our net assets (liabilities) associated with the regulated utility segment’s energy-related derivatives recorded at fair value at September 30, 2009, is summarized in the following table based on the level of the fair value calculation under ASC Topic 820:
 
                                                         
Regulated Utility Segment
 
Maturity of Net Assets (Liabilities) Associated with our Energy-Related Derivatives  
   
    Years Ended September 30,  
   
(In millions)   Total     2010     2011     2012     2013     2014     Thereafter  
   
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets
  $     $     $     $     $     $     $  
Level 2—Significant other observable inputs
    11.9       10.0       0.5             0.2       0.1       1.1  
Level 3—Significant unobservable inputs
    (6.3 )     (3.4 )     (1.7 )     (0.1 )     (0.1 )     (0.1 )     (0.9 )
Total net assets (liabilities) associated with our energy-related derivatives
  $ 5.6     $ 6.6     $ (1.2 )   $ (0.1 )   $ 0.1     $     $ 0.2  
 
Refer to Notes 5 and 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion of our derivative activities and fair value measurements.
 
Price Risk Related to the Retail Energy-Marketing Segment
 
Our retail energy-marketing subsidiary, WGEServices, sells natural gas and electricity to retail customers at both fixed and indexed prices. WGEServices must manage daily and seasonal demand fluctuations for these products with its suppliers. Price risk exists to the extent WGEServices does not closely match the timing and volume of natural gas and electricity it purchases with the related fixed price or indexed sales commitments. WGEServices’ risk management policies and procedures are designed to minimize this risk.
 
Natural Gas.  A portion of WGEServices’ annual natural gas sales volumes is subject to variations in customer demand associated with fluctuations in weather and other factors. Purchases of natural gas to fulfill retail sales commitments are generally made under fixed-volume contracts based on certain weather assumptions. If there is significant deviation from normal weather or other factors which affect customer usage, this may cause our purchase commitments to differ significantly from actual customer usage. To the extent that WGEServices cannot match its customer requirements and supply commitments, it may be exposed to commodity price and volume variances, which could negatively impact expected gross margins. WGEServices may manage these risks through the use of derivative instruments including financial products and wholesale supply contracts that provide for volumetric variability.
 
Electricity.  WGEServices procures electricity supply under contract structures in which WGEServices assumes the responsibility of matching its customer requirements with its supply purchases. WGEServices assembles the various components of supply, including electric energy from various suppliers, and capacity, ancillary services and transmission service from the PJM Interconnection, a regional transmission organization, to match its customer requirements in accordance with its risk management policy.
 
To the extent WGEServices has not sufficiently matched its customer requirements with its supply commitments, it could be exposed to electricity commodity price risk. WGEServices may manage this risk through the use of derivative instruments, including financial products.
 
WGEServices’ electric business is also exposed to fluctuations in weather and varying customer usage. Purchases generally are made under fixed-price, fixed-volume contracts that are based on certain weather assumptions. If there are significant deviations in weather or usage from these assumptions, WGEServices may incur price and volume variances that could negatively impact expected gross margins (refer to the section entitled “Weather Risk” for a further discussion of our management of weather risk).


59


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
The following two tables summarize the changes in the fair value of our net assets (liabilities) associated with the retail energy-marketing segment’s energy-related derivatives for both natural gas and electricity during the twelve months ended September 30, 2009:
 
         
Retail Energy-Marketing Segment
 
Changes in Fair Value of Energy-Related Derivatives  
   
(In millions)      
 
 
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2008
  $ (3.4 )
Net fair value of contracts entered into during the period
    (18.3 )
Other changes in net fair value
    (22.2 )
Realized net settlement of derivatives
    18.4  
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2009
  $ (25.5 )
 
         
Retail Energy-Marketing Segment
 
Roll Forward of Energy-Related Derivatives  
   
(In millions)      
 
 
 
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2008
  $ (3.4 )
Recorded to income
    (38.3 )
Recorded to accounts payable (a)
    (4.4 )
Recorded to retained earnings (b)
    1.7  
Net option premium payments
    0.5  
Realized net settlement of derivatives
    18.4  
Net assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2009
  $ (25.5 )
(a)  Represents the amount to be paid for future Financial Transmission Rights related to electricity for WGEServices.
 
(b)  Represents the cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings or other appropriate components of net assets
     upon adoption of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.
 
The maturity dates of our net assets (liabilities) associated with the retail energy-marketing segment’s energy-related derivatives recorded at fair value at September 30, 2009, is summarized in the following table based on the level of the fair value calculation under ASC Topic 820:
 
                                                         
Retail Energy Marketing Segment
 
Maturity of Net Assets (Liabilities) Associated with our Energy-Related Derivatives  
   
    Years Ended September 30,  
   
(In millions)   Total     2010     2011     2012     2013     2014     Thereafter  
   
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets
  $     $     $     $     $     $     $  
Level 2—Significant other observable inputs
    (4.2 )     (2.5 )     (0.3 )     (0.5 )     (0.8 )     (0.1 )      
Level 3—Significant unobservable inputs
    (21.3 )     (8.2 )     (9.0 )     (3.6 )     (0.5 )            
Total net assets (liabilities) associated with our energy-related derivatives
  $ (25.5 )   $ (10.7 )   $ (9.3 )   $ (4.1 )   $ (1.3 )   $ (0.1 )   $  
 
Refer to Notes 5 and 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our derivative activities and fair value measurements.
 
Value-at-Risk.  WGEServices measures the market risk of its energy commodity portfolio by determining its value-at-risk. Value-at-risk is an estimate of the maximum loss that can be expected at some level of probability if a portfolio is held for a given time period. The value-at-risk calculation for natural gas and electric portfolios include assumptions for normal weather, new customers and renewing customers for which supply commitments have been secured. Based on a 95% confidence interval for a one-day


60


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
holding period, WGEServices’ value-at-risk at September 30, 2009 was approximately $27,000 and $51,000, related to its natural gas and electric portfolios, respectively.
 
     Weather Risk
 
We are exposed to various forms of weather risk in both our regulated utility and unregulated business segments. For Washington Gas, a large portion of its revenues is volume driven and its current rates are based upon an assumption of normal weather, however, billing adjustment mechanisms described below address variations from this assumption. Without weather protection strategies, variations from normal weather will cause our earnings to increase or decrease depending on the weather pattern. Washington Gas currently has a weather protection strategy that is designed to neutralize the estimated financial effects of weather on its net income, as discussed below.
 
The financial results of our non-regulated energy-marketing business, WGEServices, are also affected by variations from normal weather primarily in the winter relating to its natural gas sales, and throughout the fiscal year relating to its electricity sales. WGEServices manages these weather risks with, among other things, weather derivatives.
 
Billing Adjustment Mechanisms.  In Maryland, Washington Gas has a RNA billing mechanism that is designed to stabilize the level of net revenues collected from Maryland customers by eliminating the effect of deviations in customer usage caused by variations in weather from normal levels and other factors such as conservation. In Virginia, Washington Gas has a WNA mechanism which is a billing adjustment mechanism that is designed to eliminate the effect of variations in weather from normal levels on utility net revenues.
 
For both the RNA and the WNA mechanisms, periods of colder-than-normal weather generally would cause Washington Gas to record a reduction to its revenues and establish a refund liability to customers, while the opposite would generally result during periods of warmer-than-normal weather. However, factors such as volatile weather patterns and customer conservation may cause the RNA to function conversely because it adjusts billed revenues to provide a designed level of net revenue per meter.
 
Weather Derivatives.  On October 1, 2008, Washington Gas executed three HDD derivative contracts to manage its exposure to variations from normal weather in the District of Columbia. Washington Gas purchased an HDD put option to protect against net revenue shortfalls due to warmer-than-normal weather during fiscal year 2009. To offset the cost of this warm weather protection, Washington Gas sold cold weather benefits in the form of two HDD call options. The net pre-tax premium cost of these transactions was $250,000 plus fees of $44,000.
 
As a result of the colder-than-normal weather during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, Washington Gas received no warm-weather benefit from this strategy and paid out $3.0 million on the cold weather benefits sold. Through September 30, 2009, the Company has recognized a pre-tax loss from its weather derivatives of $3.3 million. This loss was offset by higher net revenues caused by the colder-than-normal weather.
 
On September 21, 2009, Washington Gas executed an HDD derivative contract to manage its exposure to variations from normal weather in the District of Columbia during fiscal year 2010. Under this contract, Washington Gas purchased protection against net revenue shortfalls due to warmer-than-normal weather and sold cold weather benefits. This derivative contract resulted in a payment to Washington Gas of $2.1 million.
 
WGEServices utilizes HDD derivatives from time to time to manage weather risks related to its natural gas sales. WGEServices also utilizes cooling degree day (CDD) derivatives to manage weather risks related to its electricity sales during the summer cooling season. These derivatives cover a portion of WGEServices’ estimated revenue or energy-related cost exposure to variations in HDDs or CDDs. Refer to Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion of the accounting for these weather-related instruments.
 
     Interest-Rate Risk
 
We are exposed to interest-rate risk associated with our short-term and long-term financing. Management of this risk is discussed below.
 
Short-Term Debt.  At September 30, 2009 and 2008, WGL Holdings and its subsidiaries had outstanding notes payable of $183.8 million and $271.0 million, respectively. The carrying amount of our short-term debt approximates fair value. In fiscal year


61


 

 
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
2009, a change of 100 basis points in the underlying average interest rate for our short-term debt would have caused a change in interest expense of approximately $1.8 million.
 
Long-Term Debt.  At September 30, 2009, we had fixed-rate MTNs and other long-term debt aggregating $561.8 million in principal amount, excluding current maturities and unamortized discounts, and having a fair value of $627.8 million. Fair value is defined as the present value of the debt securities’ future cash flows discounted at interest rates that reflect market conditions as of September 30, 2009. While these are fixed-rate instruments and, therefore, do not expose us to the risk of earnings loss due to changes in market interest rates, they are subject to changes in fair value as market interest rates change. None of Washington Gas’s outstanding MTNs, excluding current maturities, have unexpired put options. None of Washington Gas’s outstanding MTNs, excluding current maturities, have unexpired call options. In addition, a total of $421.5 million, or approximately 74.5%, of Washington Gas’s outstanding MTNs, excluding current maturities, have make-whole call options, and no associated put options.
 
Using sensitivity analyses to measure this market risk exposure, we estimate that the fair value of our long-term debt would increase by approximately $24.0 million or decrease by approximately $22.4 million if interest rates were to decline or increase by 10%, or 41 basis points, respectively, from current market levels. In general, such an increase or decrease in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if Washington Gas were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments in the open market prior to their maturity.
 
Derivative Instruments.  Washington Gas utilizes derivative instruments from time to time in order to minimize its exposure to the risk of interest-rate volatility. On July 6, 2009, Washington Gas entered into the following three interest-rate derivative transactions to mitigate a substantial portion of the risk of rising interest rates associated with future debt issuances: (i)  a Treasury lock that expired August 11, 2009 at a gain of $311,000 (pre-tax), locking in a 3.59% Treasury yield on $50 million of ten-year debt that was issued on November 2, 2009 (refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Management’s Discussion); (ii) a forward starting swap that expires April 6, 2010 and locks in a 4.10% cost for the combined Treasury and LIBOR exposure on $4 million of ten-year debt and (iii) a forward starting swap that expires June 21, 2010 and locks in a 4.19% cost for the combined Treasury and LIBOR exposure on $20 million of ten-year debt. The expiration of each unexpired interest-rate derivative is timed to coincide with expected issuance of new debt securities whose proceeds will refund maturing medium-term notes. There was no activity associated with these types of derivatives in fiscal year 2008.


62


 

Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
 
WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT COMPANY
 
This section of Management’s Discussion focuses on Washington Gas for the reported periods. In many cases, explanations and disclosures for both WGL Holdings and Washington Gas are substantially the same.
 
     RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The results of operations for the regulated utility segment and Washington Gas are substantially the same; therefore, this section primarily focuses on statistical information and other information that is not discussed in the results of operations for the regulated utility segment. Refer to the section entitled “Results of Operations—Regulated Utility” in Management’s Discussion for WGL Holdings for a detailed discussion of the results of operations for the regulated utility segment.
 
Washington Gas’s net income applicable to its common stock was $105.3 million, $112.9 million and $89.2 million for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net income for fiscal year 2009, decreased $7.6 million over fiscal year 2008, reflecting the unfavorable effects of changes in natural gas consumption patterns that benefited 2008 net revenues and a scheduled increase in the level of recurring service costs related to our business process outsourcing, partially offset by additional net revenues attributable to customer growth and lower employee benefit expense. Net income for fiscal year 2008, increased $23.7 million over fiscal year 2007 primarily reflecting new rates in all jurisdictions as well as earnings from our new asset optimization strategy, partially offset by higher operation and maintenance expenses. Key gas delivery, weather and meter statistics are shown in the table below for the fiscal years ending September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
 
                                         
Gas Deliveries, Weather and Meter Statistics  
   
    Years Ended September 30,     Increase (decrease)  
   
                      2009
    2008
 
    2009     2008     2007     vs. 2008     vs. 2007  
   
 
Gas Sales and Deliveries (millions of therms)
                                       
Firm
                                       
Gas sold and delivered
    893.0       826.9       852.7       66.1       (25.8 )
Gas delivered for others
    462.1       434.0       433.4       28.1       0.6  
Total firm
    1,355.1       1,260.9       1,286.1       94.2       (25.2 )
Interruptible
                                       
Gas sold and delivered
    3.4       6.5       5.3       (3.1 )     1.2  
Gas delivered for others
    273.8       256.7       267.3       17.1       (10.6 )
Total interruptible
    277.2       263.2       272.6       14.0       (9.4 )
Electric generation—delivered for others
    102.8       92.1       111.9       10.7       (19.8 )
Total deliveries
    1,735.1       1,616.2       1,670.6       118.9       (54.4 )
Degree Days
                                       
Actual
    4,211       3,458       3,955       753       (497 )
Normal
    3,773       3,788       3,815       (15 )     (27 )
Percent colder (warmer) than normal
    11.6 %     (8.7 )%     3.7 %     n/a       n/a  
Average active customer meters
    1,065,573       1,055,396       1,045,709       10,177       9,687  
New customer meters added
    11,011       12,962       19,373       (1,951 )     (6,411 )
 
Gas Service to Firm Customers
 
The volume of gas delivered to firm customers is highly sensitive to weather variability as a large portion of the natural gas delivered by Washington Gas is used for space heating. Washington Gas’s rates are based on an assumption of normal weather. The tariffs in the Maryland and Virginia jurisdictions include provisions that consider the effects of the RNA and WNA mechanisms, respectively, which are designed to, among other things, eliminate the effect in net revenues of variations in weather from normal


63


 

Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
levels (refer to the section entitled “Weather Risk” for a further discussion of these mechanisms and other weather-related instruments included in our weather protection strategy). In addition to these mechanisms, the combination of declining block rates in the Maryland and Virginia jurisdictions and the existence of a fixed demand charges in all jurisdictions to collect a portion of revenues reduce the effect that variations from normal weather have on net revenues.
 
Fiscal Year 2009 vs. Fiscal Year 2008.  During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, total gas deliveries to firm customers were 1.355 billion therms, an increase of 94.2 million therms, or 7.5%, in deliveries from fiscal year 2008. This comparison in natural gas deliveries to firm customers primarily reflects colder weather in the current fiscal year than the prior year as well as an increase in average active customer meters of 10,177.
 
In relation to normal weather patterns, weather for fiscal year 2009 was 11.6% colder than normal, as compared to 8.7% warmer than normal for fiscal year 2008. Washington Gas’s overall weather protection strategy in 2009 is designed to neutralize the variations from normal weather on earnings; therefore, the effects of weather were insignificant for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
 
Many customers choose to buy the natural gas commodity from unregulated third party marketers, rather than purchase the natural gas commodity and delivery service from Washington Gas on a “bundled” basis. Natural gas delivered to firm customers but purchased from unregulated third party marketers represented 34.1% of total firm therms delivered during fiscal year 2009, compared to 34.4% and 33.7% of therms delivered during fiscal years 2008 and 2007, respectively. On a per unit basis, Washington Gas earns the same net revenues from delivering gas for others as it earns from bundled gas sales in which customers purchase both the natural gas commodity and the associated delivery service from Washington Gas. Therefore, Washington Gas does not experience any loss in utility net revenues when customers choose to purchase the natural gas commodity from an unregulated third party marketer.
 
Fiscal Year 2008 vs. Fiscal Year 2007.  During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, total gas deliveries to firm customers were 1.261 billion therms, a decrease of 25.2 million therms, or 2.0%, in deliveries from fiscal year 2007. This comparison in natural gas deliveries to firm customers primarily reflects warmer weather in the current fiscal year than the prior year partially offset by an increase in average active customer meters of 9,687, well as the favorable effects of changes in natural gas consumption patterns due to shifts in weather patterns and non-weather related factors.
 
In relation to normal weather patterns, weather for fiscal year 2008 was 8.7% warmer than normal, as compared to 3.7% colder than normal for fiscal year 2007. Washington Gas’s overall weather protection strategy in 2008 and 2007 was designed to neutralize the estimated negative financial effects of warmer-than-normal weather on earnings; therefore, there were no estimated effects on net income from the warmer-than-normal weather in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. Including the effects of our weather protection strategies, the colder-than-normal weather in fiscal year 2007 enhanced net income by an estimated $5.4 million (pre-tax).
 
Natural gas delivered to firm customers but purchased from unregulated third party marketers represented 34.4% of total firm therms delivered during fiscal year 2008, compared to 33.7% and 33.3% of therms delivered during fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively. On a per unit basis, Washington Gas earns the same net revenues from delivering gas for others as it earns from bundled gas sales in which customers purchase both the natural gas commodity and the associated delivery service from Washington Gas. Therefore, Washington Gas does not experience any loss in utility net revenues when customers choose to purchase the natural gas commodity from an unregulated third party marketer.
 
Gas Service to Interruptible Customers
 
Washington Gas must curtail or interrupt service to this class of customer when the demand by firm customers exceeds specified levels. Therm deliveries to interruptible customers increased by 14.0 million therms, or 5.3%, in fiscal year 2009 compared to fiscal year 2008, reflecting increased demand due to colder weather. Therm deliveries to interruptible customers decreased by 9.4 million therms, or 3.4%, in fiscal year 2008 compared to fiscal year 2007, reflecting decreased demand due to warmer weather.
 
In the District of Columbia, the effect on net income of any changes in delivered volumes and prices to interruptible customers is limited by margin-sharing arrangements that are included in Washington Gas’s rate designs in the District of Columbia. In the District of Columbia, Washington Gas shares a majority of the margins earned on interruptible gas sales and deliveries with firm customers. A portion of the fixed costs for servicing interruptible customers is collected through the firm customers’ rate design. Rates for interruptible customers in Maryland and Virginia are based on a traditional cost of service approach. In Virginia, Washington Gas retains all revenues above a pre-approved margin threshold level. In Maryland, Washington Gas retains a defined amount of revenues based on a set threshold.


64


 

Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
Gas Service for Electric Generation
 
Washington Gas delivers natural gas for use at two electric generation facilities in Maryland that are each owned by companies independent of WGL Holdings. During fiscal year 2009, deliveries to these customers increased 11.6% from fiscal year 2008. During fiscal year 2008, deliveries to these customers decreased 17.7% from fiscal year 2007. Washington Gas shares with firm customers a significant majority of the margins earned from natural gas deliveries to these customers. Therefore, changes in the volume of interruptible gas deliveries to these customers do not materially affect either net revenues or net income.
 
Cost of Gas
 
Washington Gas’s cost of natural gas sold to customers includes both fixed and variable components. Washington Gas pays fixed costs or “demand charges” to pipeline companies for system capacity needed to transport and store natural gas. Washington Gas pays variable costs, or the cost of the natural gas commodity itself, to natural gas producers and suppliers. Variations in the utility’s cost of gas expense result from changes in gas sales volumes, the price of the gas purchased and the level of gas costs collected through the operation of firm gas cost recovery mechanisms. Under these regulated recovery mechanisms, Washington Gas records cost of gas expense equal to the cost of gas recovered from customers and included in revenues. The difference between the firm gas costs incurred and the gas costs recovered from customers is deferred on the balance sheet as an amount to be collected from or refunded to customers in future periods. Therefore, increases or decreases in the cost of gas associated with sales made to firm customers have no direct effect on Washington Gas’s net revenues and net income. Changes in the cost of gas can cause significant variations in Washington Gas’s cash provided by or used in operating activities. Washington Gas receives from or pays to its customers in the District of Columbia and Virginia, carrying costs associated with under-collected or over-collected gas costs recovered from its customers using short-term interest rates. Additionally, included in “Utility cost of gas” for Washington Gas are the net margins associated with our internal asset optimization program. To the extent these amounts are shared with customers in Virginia and the District of Columbia, they are a reduction to the cost of gas invoiced to customers. Amounts shared with Maryland customers are recorded in operating revenues. Refer to the section entitled “Market Risk—Regulated Utility Segment” for a further discussion of Washington Gas’s optimization program.
 
The commodity cost of gas invoiced to Washington Gas (excluding the cost and related volumes applicable to asset optimization) were $0.79, $0.89 and $0.85 per therm for fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The lower gas costs in fiscal year 2009 reflect an overall decrease in natural gas price in the wholesale market. The higher gas costs in fiscal year 2008 reflect a slight increase in the price volatility in the wholesale market. The lower gas cost in fiscal year 2007 reflects decreased price volatility. Increased gas costs generally will result in higher short-term debt levels and greater short-term interest costs to finance higher accounts receivables and storage gas inventory balances, as well as result in higher uncollectible accounts expenses.
 
Revenue Taxes
 
Revenue taxes are comprised of gross receipts taxes, PSC fees, franchise fees and energy taxes. Changes in revenue taxes are impacted by changes in the volume of gas sold and delivered. The increase in revenue taxes of $5.8 million in fiscal year 2009 compared to the prior year was mostly attributable to an increase in therm deliveries in Montgomery County and the District of Columbia in fiscal year 2009 over the prior year coupled with higher residential and commercial fuel tax rates that went into effect during the latter half of 2008. Revenue taxes were relatively unchanged when comparing fiscal year 2008 and 2007. Revenue taxes are recorded to “General taxes and other assessments” in the Statements of Income.
 
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
 
Liquidity and capital resources for Washington Gas are substantially the same as the liquidity and capital resources discussion included in the Management’s Discussion of WGL Holdings (except for certain items and transactions that pertain to WGL Holdings and its unregulated subsidiaries). Those explanations are incorporated by reference into this discussion.
 
RATES AND REGULATORY MATTERS
 
Washington Gas determines its request to modify existing rates based on the level of net investment in plant and equipment, operating expenses and the need to earn a just and reasonable return on invested capital.


65


 

Washington Gas Light Company
Part II
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)
 
The following table summarizes major rate applications and results.
 
<