Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - FORM 8-K - HCC INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC/DE/ | h68221e8vk.htm |
EX-99.4 - EX-99.4 - HCC INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC/DE/ | h68221exv99w4.htm |
EX-99.6 - EX-99.6 - HCC INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC/DE/ | h68221exv99w6.htm |
EX-99.3 - EX-99.3 - HCC INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC/DE/ | h68221exv99w3.htm |
EX-99.5 - EX-99.5 - HCC INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC/DE/ | h68221exv99w5.htm |
EX-99.2 - EX-99.2 - HCC INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC/DE/ | h68221exv99w2.htm |
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - HCC INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC/DE/ | h68221exv23w1.htm |
Exhibit 99.1
PART I
Item 1. | Business |
Business
Overview
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. is a Delaware corporation, which
was formed in 1991. Its predecessor corporation was formed in
1974. Our principal executive offices are located at 13403
Northwest Freeway, Houston, Texas 77040, and our telephone
number is
(713) 690-7300.
We maintain an Internet website at www.hcc.com. The
reference to our Internet website address in this Report does
not constitute the incorporation by reference of the information
contained at the website in this Report. We will make available,
free of charge through publication on our Internet website, a
copy of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and any current reports on
Form 8-K
or amendments to those reports, filed with or furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as soon as reasonably
practicable after we have filed or furnished such materials with
the SEC.
As used in this report, unless otherwise required by the
context, the terms we, us and
our refer to HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries and the term HCC refers
only to HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. All trade names or
trademarks appearing in this report are the property of their
respective holders.
We provide specialized property and casualty, surety, and group
life, accident and health insurance coverages and related agency
and reinsurance brokerage services to commercial customers and
individuals. We concentrate our activities in selected, narrowly
defined, specialty lines of business. We operate primarily in
the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, Bermuda and
Ireland. Some of our operations have a broader international
scope. We underwrite on both a direct basis, where we insure a
risk in exchange for a premium, and on a reinsurance (assumed)
basis, where we insure all or a portion of another, or ceding,
insurance companys risk in exchange for all or a portion
of the ceding insurance companys premium for the risk. We
market our products both directly to customers and through a
network of independent and affiliated brokers, producers, agents
and third party administrators.
Since our founding, we have been consistently profitable,
generally reporting annual increases in total revenue and
shareholders equity. During the period 2004 through 2008,
we had an average statutory combined ratio of 87.4% versus the
less favorable 98.4% (source: A.M. Best Company, Inc.)
recorded by the U.S. property and casualty insurance
industry overall. During the period 2004 through 2008, our gross
written premium increased from $2.0 billion to
$2.5 billion, an increase of 27%, while net written premium
increased 86% from $1.1 billion to $2.1 billion.
During this period, our revenue increased from $1.3 billion
to $2.3 billion, an increase of 77%. During the period
December 31, 2004 through December 31, 2008, our
shareholders equity increased 97% from $1.3 billion
to $2.6 billion and our assets increased 41% from
$5.9 billion to $8.3 billion.
Our insurance companies are risk-bearing and focus their
underwriting activities on providing insurance
and/or
reinsurance in the following lines of business:
| Diversified financial products | |
| Group life, accident and health | |
| Aviation | |
| London market account | |
| Other specialty lines |
Our domestic operating insurance companies are rated AA
(Very Strong) (3rd of 23 ratings) by
Standard & Poors Corporation and AA (Very
Strong) by Fitch Ratings (3rd of 21 ratings). Our
international operating insurance companies are rated AA
(Very Strong) by Standard & Poors
Corporation. Avemco Insurance Company, HCC Life Insurance
Company, Houston Casualty Company and U.S. Specialty
Insurance Company are rated A+ (Superior)
(2nd of 16 ratings) by A.M. Best Company, Inc.
American Contractors
Indemnity Company, Perico Life Insurance Company, United States
Surety Company and HCC Insurance Company are rated A
(Excellent) (3rd of 16 ratings) by A.M. Best
Company, Inc. Standard & Poors, Fitch Ratings
and A.M. Best are internationally recognized independent
rating agencies. These financial strength ratings are intended
to provide an independent opinion of an insurers ability
to meet its obligations to policyholders and are not evaluations
directed at investors.
Our underwriting agencies underwrite on behalf of our insurance
companies and in certain situations for other unaffiliated
insurance companies. They receive fees for these services and do
not bear any of the insurance risk of the companies for which
they underwrite. Our underwriting agencies generate revenues
based on fee income and profit commissions. The agencies
specialize in the following types of business: contingency
(including contest indemnification, event cancellation and
weather coverages); directors and officers
liability; individual disability (for athletes and other high
profile individuals); kidnap and ransom; employment practices
liability; marine; professional indemnity; public entity;
various financial products; short-term medical; fidelity,
difference in conditions (earthquake) and other specialty
business. Our principal underwriting agencies are Covenant
Underwriters, G.B. Kenrick & Associates, HCC Global
Financial Products, HCC Indemnity Guaranty Agency, HCC Specialty
Underwriters, MultiNational Underwriters, LLC, Professional
Indemnity Agency and RA&MCO Insurance Services.
Our brokers provide reinsurance and insurance brokerage services
for our insurance companies, agencies and our clients and
receive fees for their services. A reinsurance broker structures
and arranges reinsurance between insurers seeking to cede
insurance risks and reinsurers willing to assume such risks.
Reinsurance brokers do not bear any of the insurance risks of
their client companies. They earn commission income, and to a
lesser extent, fees for certain services, generally paid by the
insurance and reinsurance companies with whom the business is
placed. Insurance broker operations consist of consulting with
retail and wholesale clients by providing information about
insurance coverage and marketing, placing and negotiating
particular insurance risks. Our brokers specialize in placing
insurance and reinsurance for group life, accident and health,
aviation, surety, marine, and property and casualty lines of
business. Our brokers are Continental Underwriters and Rattner
Mackenzie.
Our
Strategy
Our business philosophy is to maximize underwriting profits and
produce non-risk-bearing fee and commission income while
limiting risk in order to preserve shareholders equity and
maximize earnings. We concentrate our insurance writings in
selected, narrowly defined, specialty lines of business in which
we believe we can achieve an underwriting profit. We also rely
on our experienced underwriting personnel and our access to and
expertise in the reinsurance marketplace to achieve our
strategic objectives. We market our insurance products both
directly to customers and through affiliated and independent
brokers, agents, producers and third party administrators.
The property and casualty insurance industry and individual
lines of business within the industry are cyclical. There are
times, particularly when there is excess capital in the industry
or underwriting results have been good, when a large number of
companies offer insurance on certain lines of business, causing
premium rates and premiums written by companies to trend
downward. During other times, insurance companies limit their
writings in certain lines of business due to lack of capital or
following periods of excessive losses. This results in an
increase in premium rates and premiums for those companies that
continue to write insurance in those lines of business.
In our insurance company operations, we believe our operational
flexibility, which permits us to shift the focus of our
insurance underwriting activity among our various lines of
business, allows us to implement a strategy of emphasizing more
profitable lines of business during periods of increased premium
rates and de-emphasizing less profitable lines of business
during periods of increased competition. In addition, we believe
that our underwriting agencies and brokers complement our
insurance underwriting activities. Our ability to utilize
affiliated insurers, underwriting agencies and reinsurance
brokers permits us to retain a greater portion of the gross
revenue derived from our written premium.
Following a period in which premium rates rose substantially,
premium rates in several of our lines of business became more
competitive during the past five years. The rate decreases were
more gradual than the prior rate increases; thus, our
underwriting activities remain profitable. During the past
several years, we expanded our underwriting activities and
increased our retentions in response to these market conditions,
to the increased spread provided by our overall book of
business, and to our increased capital strength. During 2005 and
2006, we increased our retentions on certain of our lines of
business that were not generally exposed to catastrophe risk and
where profit margins were usually more predictable. These higher
retention levels increased our net written and earned premium
and have resulted in additional underwriting profits, investment
income and net earnings.
Through reinsurance, our insurance companies transfer or cede
all or part of the risk we have underwritten to a reinsurance
company in exchange for all or part of the premium we receive in
connection with the risk. We purchase reinsurance to limit the
net loss to our insurance companies from both individual and
catastrophic risks. The amount of reinsurance we purchase varies
depending on, among other things, the particular risks inherent
in the policies underwritten, the pricing of reinsurance and the
competitive conditions within the relevant line of business.
When we decide to retain more underwriting risk in a particular
line of business, we do so with the intention of retaining a
greater portion of any underwriting profits without increasing
our exposure to severe or catastrophe losses. In this regard, we
may purchase less proportional or quota share reinsurance
applicable to that line, thus accepting more of the risk but
possibly replacing it with specific excess of loss reinsurance,
in which we transfer to reinsurers both premium and losses on a
non-proportional basis for individual and catastrophic risks
above a retention point. Additionally, we may obtain facultative
reinsurance protection on individual risks. In some cases, we
may choose not to purchase reinsurance in a line of business in
which we believe there has been a favorable loss history, our
policy limits are relatively low or we determine there is a low
likelihood of catastrophe exposure.
We also acquire or make strategic investments in companies that
present an opportunity for future profits or for the enhancement
of our business. We expect to continue to acquire complementary
businesses. We believe that we can enhance acquired businesses
through the synergies created by our underwriting capabilities
and our other operations.
Our business plan is shaped by our underlying business
philosophy, which is to maximize underwriting profit and net
earnings while preserving and achieving long-term growth of
shareholders equity. As a result, our primary objective is
to increase net earnings rather than market share or gross
written premium.
In our ongoing operations, we will continue to:
| emphasize the underwriting of lines of business in which there is an anticipation of underwriting profits based on various factors including premium rates, the availability and cost of reinsurance, policy terms and conditions, and market conditions, | |
| limit our insurance companies aggregate net loss exposure from a catastrophic loss through the use of reinsurance for those lines of business exposed to such losses and diversification into lines of business not exposed to such losses, and | |
| consider the potential acquisition of specialty insurance operations and other strategic investments. |
Industry
Segment and Geographic Information
Financial information concerning our operations by industry
segment and geographic data is included in the Consolidated
Financial Statements and Notes thereto.
Acquisitions
We have made a series of acquisitions that have furthered our
overall business strategy. Our major transactions during the
last three years are described below:
On July 1, 2006, we acquired G.B. Kenrick &
Associates, Inc., an underwriting agency located in Auburn
Hills, Michigan, recognized as a premier underwriter of public
entity insurance. Kenrick operates as a subsidiary of
Professional Indemnity Agency.
On October 2, 2006, we acquired the assets of the Health
Products Division of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North
America (the Health Products Division) for cash consideration of
$140.0 million and assumed the outstanding loss reserves.
The Health Products Divisions operations include medical
stop-loss insurance for self-insured corporations and groups;
medical excess insurance for HMOs; provider excess insurance for
integrated delivery systems; excess medical reinsurance to small
and regional insurance carriers; and LifeTrac, a network for
providing organ and bone marrow transplants. We integrated the
Health Products Divisions operations into HCC Life
Insurance Company.
On January 2, 2008, we acquired MultiNational Underwriters,
LLC, an underwriting agency located in Indianapolis, Indiana for
cash consideration of $42.7 million and possible additional
cash consideration depending upon future underwriting profit
levels. This agency writes domestic and international short-term
medical insurance. We formed Syndicate 4141 at Lloyds of
London to write the international business.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, we acquired four underwriting
agencies for total consideration of $29.9 million. On
October 1, 2008 we acquired the Criminal Justice division
of U.S. Risk Insurance Brokers. Rebranded Pinnacle
Underwriting Partners, this newly established underwriting
agency, located in Scottsdale, Arizona, serves the private
detention and security industry. On November 1, 2008, we
acquired Cox Insurance Group, a medical stop-loss managing
general underwriter covering the Midwestern United States. On
December 1, 2008, we acquired Arrowhead Public Risk, a
division of Arrowhead General Insurance Agency, Inc., a managing
general agency based in Richmond, Virginia, specializing in risk
management for the public entity sector. On December 31,
2008, we acquired VMGU Insurance Agency, a leading underwriter
of the lumber, building materials, forest products and
woodworking industries, based in Waltham, Massachusetts.
On December 3, 2008, we announced that the Company had
executed an agreement to acquire Surety Company of the Pacific,
a leading writer of license and permit bonds headquartered in
Encino, California. This transaction closed on February 28, 2009.
We continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities, and we may
complete additional acquisitions during 2009. Any future
acquisitions will be designed to expand and strengthen our
existing lines of business or to provide access to additional
specialty sectors, which we expect to contribute to our overall
growth.
Insurance
Company Operations
Lines
of Business
This table shows our insurance companies total premium
written, otherwise known as gross written premium, by line of
business and the percentage of each line to total gross written
premium (dollars in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Diversified financial products
|
$ | 1,051,722 | 42 | % | $ | 963,355 | 39 | % | $ | 956,057 | 43 | % | ||||||||||||
Group life, accident and health
|
829,903 | 33 | 798,684 | 33 | 621,639 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Aviation
|
185,786 | 8 | 195,809 | 8 | 216,208 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
London market account
|
175,561 | 7 | 213,716 | 9 | 234,868 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other specialty lines
|
251,021 | 10 | 280,040 | 11 | 205,651 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued lines of business
|
4,770 | | (425 | ) | | 1,225 | | |||||||||||||||||
Total gross written premium
|
$ | 2,498,763 | 100 | % | $ | 2,451,179 | 100 | % | $ | 2,235,648 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
This table shows our insurance companies actual premium
retained, otherwise known as net written premium, by line of
business and the percentage of each line to total net written
premium (dollars in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Diversified financial products
|
$ | 872,007 | 42 | % | $ | 771,648 | 39 | % | $ | 794,232 | 44 | % | ||||||||||||
Group life, accident and health
|
789,479 | 38 | 759,207 | 38 | 590,811 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||
Aviation
|
136,019 | 7 | 145,761 | 7 | 166,258 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
London market account
|
107,234 | 5 | 118,241 | 6 | 127,748 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other specialty lines
|
151,120 | 8 | 191,151 | 10 | 133,481 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued lines of business
|
4,759 | | (399 | ) | | 22 | | |||||||||||||||||
Total net written premium
|
$ | 2,060,618 | 100 | % | $ | 1,985,609 | 100 | % | $ | 1,812,552 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
This table shows our insurance companies net written
premium as a percentage of gross written premium, otherwise
referred to as percentage retained, for our continuing lines of
business:
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Diversified financial products
|
83 | % | 80 | % | 83 | % | ||||||
Group life, accident and health
|
95 | 95 | 95 | |||||||||
Aviation
|
73 | 74 | 77 | |||||||||
London market account
|
61 | 55 | 54 | |||||||||
Other specialty lines
|
60 | 68 | 65 | |||||||||
Consolidated percentage retained
|
82 | % | 81 | % | 81 | % | ||||||
Underwriting
We underwrite business produced through affiliated underwriting
agencies, through independent and affiliated brokers, producers
and third party administrators, and by direct marketing efforts.
We also write facultative or individual account reinsurance, as
well as some treaty reinsurance business.
Diversified
Financial Products
We underwrite a variety of financial insurance risks in our
diversified financial products line of business. These risks
include:
directors and officers
liability
|
surety and credit | |
employment practices liability
|
fidelity | |
professional indemnity
|
various financial products |
We began to underwrite this line of business through a
predecessor company in 1977. Our insurance companies started
participating in this business in 2001. We have substantially
increased our level of business through the acquisition of a
number of agencies and insurance companies that operate in this
line of business, both domestically and internationally. Each of
the acquired entities has significant experience in its
respective specialty within this line of business. We have also
formed entities developed around teams of experienced
underwriters that offer these products.
In 2002 and 2003, following several years of insurance industry
losses, significant rate increases were experienced throughout
our diversified financial products line of business,
particularly directors and officers liability, which
we began underwriting in 2002. We benefited greatly from these
improved conditions despite the fact that we had not been
involved in the past losses. Rates softened between 2004 and
2008 for some of the products in this line and increased for
other products in 2008, but our underwriting margins are still
very profitable. There is also considerable investment income
derived from diversified financial products due to the extended
periods involved in claims resolution. Although individual
losses in the directors and officers public
company liability business may have potential severity, the
remainder of the diversified financial products business is less
volatile with relatively low limits.
Group
Life, Accident and Health
We write medical stop-loss business through HCC Life Insurance
Company and, since its December 2005 acquisition, Perico Life
Insurance Company. Our medical stop-loss insurance provides
coverages to companies, associations and public entities that
elect to self-insure their employees medical coverage for
losses within specified levels, allowing them to manage the risk
of excessive health insurance exposure by limiting aggregate and
specific losses to a predetermined amount. We first began
writing this business through a predecessor company in 1980. Our
insurance companies started participating in this business in
1997. This line of business has grown both organically and
through acquisitions. We are considered a market leader in
medical stop-loss insurance. We also underwrite a small program
of group life insurance, offered to our insureds as a complement
to our medical stop-loss products.
Premium rates for medical stop-loss business rose substantially
beginning in 2000 and, although competition has increased in
recent years and the amount of premium rate increases has
decreased, underwriting results have remained profitable.
Premium rate increases together with deductible increases are
still adequate to cover medical cost trends. Medical stop-loss
business has relatively low limits, a low level of catastrophe
exposure, a generally predictable result and a short time span
between the writing of premium, the reporting of claims and the
payment of claims. We currently buy no reinsurance for this line
of business.
Our risk management business is composed of provider excess, HMO
and medical excess risks. This business has relatively lower
limits and a low level of catastrophe exposure. The business is
competitive, but remains profitable.
We began writing alternative workers compensation and
occupational accident insurance in 1996. This business is
currently written through U.S. Specialty Insurance Company.
These products have relatively low limits, a relatively low
level of catastrophe exposure and a generally predictable result.
With the acquisition of MultiNational Underwriters, LLC, we
began writing short-term domestic and international medical
insurance that covers individuals when there is a lapse in
coverage or when traveling internationally. This business has
relatively low limits and the term is generally of short
duration. This business is primarily produced on an internet
platform.
Aviation
We are a market leader in the general aviation insurance
industry insuring aviation risks, both domestically and
internationally. Types of aviation business we insure include:
antique and vintage military aircraft
|
fixed base operations | |
cargo operators
|
military law enforcement aircraft | |
commuter airlines
|
private aircraft owners | |
corporate aircraft
|
rotor wing aircraft |
We offer coverages that include hulls, engines, avionics and
other systems, liabilities, cargo and other ancillary coverages.
We generally do not insure major airlines, major manufacturers,
products or satellites. Insurance claims related to general
aviation business tend to be seasonal, with the majority of the
claims being incurred during warm weather months.
We have been underwriting aviation risks through Houston
Casualty Company since 1981 and Avemco Insurance Company and
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, which were acquired in
1997, have written this business since 1959. We are one of the
largest writers of personal aircraft insurance in the United
States. Our aviation gross premium has remained relatively
stable since 1998, but it has decreased slightly in 2007 and
2008 due to competition and decreasing rates, principally in the
domestic business. We have generally increase our retentions
since 1998 as this business is predominantly written with small
limits and has generally
predictable results. The market related to international risks
is very competitive and has seen rate decreases over the last
few years, but is now showing signs of stabilizing.
London
Market Account
Our London market account business consists of marine, energy,
property, and accident and health business and has been
primarily underwritten by Houston Casualty Companys London
branch office. During 2006, we began to utilize HCC
International Insurance Company to underwrite the
non-U.S. based
risks for this line of business. This line includes most of our
catastrophe exposures. We have underwritten these risks for more
than 15 years, increasing or decreasing our premium volume
depending on market conditions, which can be very volatile in
this line. The following table presents the details of net
premium written within the London market account line of
business (in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Marine
|
$ | 14,413 | $ | 30,685 | $ | 26,664 | ||||||
Energy
|
44,554 | 45,962 | 57,619 | |||||||||
Property
|
28,827 | 19,856 | 18,049 | |||||||||
Accident and health
|
19,440 | 21,738 | 25,416 | |||||||||
Total London market account net written premium
|
$ | 107,234 | $ | 118,241 | $ | 127,748 | ||||||
We underwrite marine risks for ocean-going vessels including
hull, protection and indemnity, liabilities and cargo. We have
underwritten marine risks since 1984 in varying amounts
depending on market conditions.
In our energy business, we underwrite physical damage, business
interruption and other ancillary coverages. We have been
underwriting both onshore and offshore energy risks since 1988.
This business includes but is not limited to:
drilling rigs
|
petrochemical plants | |
gas production and gathering platforms
|
pipelines | |
natural gas facilities
|
refineries |
Rates were relatively low for an extended period of time,
reaching levels where underwriting profitability was difficult
to achieve. As a result, we have underwritten energy risks on a
very selective basis, striving for quality rather than quantity.
Underwriting profitability was adversely impacted by hurricane
activity that occurred in 2004 and 2005, but this resulted in
2006 rates increasing substantially and policy conditions
becoming more stringent. Competitive pressures increased in
2007, adversely affecting prices, causing us to write less of
this business. The business was very profitable in 2006 and 2007
because there were no catastrophe losses. The business was
adversely affected by two hurricanes in 2008 but the business
was still profitable principally as a result of our reinsurance
coverage in force. We continue to reinsure much of our
catastrophe exposure, buying substantial amounts of reinsurance
on an excess of loss basis.
We underwrite property business specializing in risks of large,
often multinational, corporations, covering a variety of
commercial properties, which include but are not limited to:
factories
|
office buildings | |
hotels
|
retail locations | |
industrial plants
|
utilities |
We have written property business since 1986, including business
interruption, physical damage and catastrophe risks, such as
flood and earthquake. Rates increased significantly following
September 11, 2001, but trended downward by 2005 despite
the hurricane activity in 2004. Massive losses from hurricanes
in 2005 resulted in substantial rate increases, but due to over
capacity, policy conditions have remained unchanged, unlike
energy risks. Accordingly, we substantially reduced our
involvement in policies with exposures in the Florida and
U.S. Gulf Coast regions. We continue to buy substantial
catastrophe reinsurance, unlike many industry participants,
which was shown to be adequate during 2004 and 2005 when large
amounts of industry
capital were lost. While the hurricane activity seriously
affected our earnings in the third quarters of 2004 and 2005, we
still were able to produce record annual earnings in those
years. This business was profitable in 2006 and 2007 as there
were no significant catastrophe losses, and in 2008 despite the
losses from two hurricanes.
We began writing London market accident and health risks in
1996, including trip accident, medical and disability. Due to
past experience and other market factors, we significantly
decreased premiums starting in 2004, although our business is
now much more stable and profitable.
Our London market account is reinsured principally on an excess
of loss basis. We closely monitor catastrophe exposure and
purchase reinsurance to limit our net exposure to a level such
that any loss is not expected to impact our capital or exceed
our net earnings in the affected quarter. Previous net
catastrophe losses from Hurricane Andrew in 1992, the Northridge
Earthquake in 1994, the terrorist attacks on September 11,
2001, and the hurricanes of 2004, 2005 and 2008 did not exceed
our net earnings in the quarter when each occurred.
Other
Specialty Lines
In addition to the above, we underwrite various other specialty
lines of business, including different types of property and
liability business, such as event cancellation, contingency,
film completion, public entity and U.K. liability. We had an
assumed quota share contract for surplus lines business that
expired in March 2008. Individual premiums by type of business
are not material to the Other Specialty Lines line of business.
Insurance
Companies
Houston
Casualty Company
Houston Casualty Company is our largest insurance company
subsidiary. It is domiciled in Texas and insures risks
worldwide. Houston Casualty Company underwrites business
produced by independent agents and brokers, affiliated
underwriting agencies, reinsurance brokers, and other insurance
and reinsurance companies. Houston Casualty Company writes
diversified financial products, aviation, London market account
and other specialty lines of business. Houston Casualty
Companys 2008 gross written premium, including
Houston Casualty Company-London, was $586.4 million.
Houston
Casualty Company-London
Houston Casualty Company operates a branch office in London,
England, in order to more closely align its underwriting
operations with the London market, a historical focal point for
some of the business that it underwrites. In 2006, we focused
the underwriting activities of Houston Casualty
Company-Londons office on risks based in the United States
but written in the London market. We began to use HCC
International Insurance Company as a platform for much of the
European and other international risks previously underwritten
by Houston Casualty Company-London.
HCC
International Insurance Company
HCC International Insurance Company PLC writes diversified
financial products business, primarily surety, credit and
professional indemnity products, and
non-United
States based London market account risks. HCC International
Insurance Company has been in operation since 1982 and is
domiciled in the United Kingdom. HCC International Insurance
Companys 2008 gross written premium was
$233.9 million. We intend to continue to expand the
underwriting activities of HCC International Insurance Company
and to use it as an integral part of a European platform for our
international insurance operations.
U.S.
Specialty Insurance Company
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company is a Texas-domiciled
property and casualty insurance company. It primarily writes
diversified financial products, aviation and accident and health
business. U.S. Specialty Insurance Company acts as an
issuing carrier for certain business underwritten by our
underwriting agencies. U.S. Specialty Insurance
Companys gross written premium in 2008 was
$555.6 million.
HCC
Life Insurance Company
HCC Life Insurance Company is an Indiana-domiciled life
insurance company. It operates as primarily a larger group life,
accident and health insurer. Its primary products are medical
stop-loss and medical excess business. This business is produced
by unaffiliated agents, brokers and third party administrators.
In 2006, the Health Products Division was acquired and
integrated into HCC Life Insurance Company. HCC Life Insurance
Companys gross written premium in 2008 was
$692.1 million.
Avemco
Insurance Company
Avemco Insurance Company is a Maryland-domiciled property and
casualty insurer and operates as a direct market underwriter of
general aviation business. It has also been an issuing carrier
for accident and health business and some other lines of
business underwritten by our underwriting agencies and an
affiliated underwriting agency. Avemco Insurance Companys
gross written premium in 2008 was $48.5 million.
American
Contractors Indemnity Company
American Contractors Indemnity Company is a California-domiciled
surety company. It writes court, specialty contract, license and
permit, and bail bonds. American Contractors Indemnity Company
has been in operation since 1990 and operates as a part of our
HCC Surety Group. American Contractors Indemnity Companys
2008 gross written premium was $87.5 million.
HCC
Europe
Houston Casualty Company Europe, Seguros y Reaseguros, S.A. is a
Spanish insurer. It underwrites diversified financial products
business. HCC Europe is also an issuing carrier for diversified
financial products business underwritten by an affiliated
underwriting agencies and has been in operation since 1978. HCC
Europes gross written premium in 2008 was
$129.4 million.
HCC
Reinsurance Company
HCC Reinsurance Company Limited is a Bermuda-domiciled
reinsurance company that writes assumed reinsurance from our
insurance companies and a limited amount of direct insurance.
HCC Reinsurance Company is an issuing carrier for diversified
financial products business underwritten by our underwriting
agency, HCC Indemnity Guaranty. HCC Reinsurance Company also
reinsures our proportional interests in Lloyds of London
Syndicates 4040 and 4141. HCC Reinsurance Companys gross
written premium in 2008 was $135.0 million.
HCC
Specialty Insurance Company
HCC Specialty Insurance Company is an Oklahoma-domiciled
property and casualty insurance company in operation since 2002.
It writes diversified financial products and other specialty
lines of business produced by affiliated underwriting. HCC
Specialty Insurance Companys gross written premium in 2008
was $21.5 million and was 100% ceded to Houston Casualty
Company.
United
States Surety Company
United States Surety Company is a Maryland-domiciled surety
company that has been in operation since 1996. It writes
contract bonds and operates as a part of our HCC Surety Group.
United States Surety Companys 2008 gross written
premium was $24.7 million.
Perico
Life Insurance Company
Perico Life Insurance Company was a previously dormant company
acquired in December 2005 and is a Delaware-domiciled life
insurance company. Perico Life Insurance Company now operates as
primarily a small group life, accident and health insurer. Its
principal product is medical stop-loss business. In 2006, we
consolidated the operations of Perico Ltd. into Perico Life
Insurance Company. Perico Life Insurance Companys
2008 gross written premium was $52.3 million.
HCC
Insurance Company
HCC Insurance Company is an Indiana-domiciled property and
casualty insurance company. It writes business included in our
other specialty lines of business that is produced by one of our
underwriting agencies. HCC Insurance Companys gross
written premium in 2008 was $13.5 million and was 100%
ceded to Houston Casualty Company.
Lloyds
of London Syndicates
We currently have an 87% participation in Lloyds of London
Syndicate 4040, which writes business included in our other
specialty lines of business, and a 100% participation in
recently formed Lloyds of London Syndicate 4141, which
writes business in our group life, accident and health line of
business. These syndicates are managed by HCC Underwriting
Agency, Ltd. (UK). Our participation in these syndicates is
reinsured by HCC Reinsurance Company. We expect to use our
Lloyds of London platform and the licenses it affords us
to write business that is unique to Lloyds of London and
to write business in countries where our other insurance
companies are not currently licensed.
Pioneer
General Insurance Company
Pioneer General Insurance Company, which was acquired in 2007,
primarily writes a small amount of bail bond business in
Colorado.
Underwriting
Agency Operations
Historically, we have acquired underwriting agencies with
seasoned books of business and experienced underwriters. These
agencies control the distribution of their business. After we
acquire an agency, we generally begin to write some or all of
its business through our insurance companies, and, in some
cases, the insurance companies reinsure some of the business
with unaffiliated insurance companies. Over time, we retain
greater percentages of this business, reducing the revenues of
our underwriting agencies, but increasing our underwriting
profits. We have also consolidated certain of our underwriting
agencies with our insurance companies when our retention of
their business approached 100%. We plan to continue this process
into the future.
Our underwriting agencies act on behalf of affiliated and
unaffiliated insurance companies and provide insurance
underwriting management and claims administration services. Our
underwriting agencies do not assume any insurance or reinsurance
risk themselves and generate revenues based entirely on fee
income and profit commissions. These subsidiaries are in a
position to direct and control business they produce. Our
insurance companies serve as policy issuing companies for the
majority of the business written by our underwriting agencies.
If an unaffiliated insurance company serves as the policy
issuing company, our insurance companies may reinsure the
business written by our underwriting agencies. Our underwriting
agencies generated total revenue in 2008 of $162.1 million.
Professional
Indemnity Agency
Professional Indemnity Agency, Inc., based in Mount Kisco, New
York and with operations in San Francisco, California,
Concord, California, and Auburn Hills, Michigan, acts as an
underwriting manager for diversified financial products
specializing in directors and officers liability and
professional indemnity, kidnap and ransom, employment practice
liability, public entity, fidelity, difference in conditions
(earthquake) and other specialty lines of business on behalf of
affiliated and unaffiliated insurance companies. It has been in
operation since 1977.
HCC
Specialty Underwriters
HCC Specialty Underwriters Inc., with its home office in
Wakefield, Massachusetts and with branch offices in London,
England, Los Angeles, California and New York, New York, acts as
an underwriting manager for sports disability, contingency, film
completion and other group life, accident and health and
specialty lines of business on behalf of affiliated and
unaffiliated insurance companies. It has been in operation since
1982.
HCC
Global Financial Products
HCC Global Financial Products, LLC acts as an underwriting
manager for diversified financial products, specializing in
directors and officers liability business on behalf
of affiliated insurance companies. It has been in operation
since 1999, underwriting domestic business from Farmington,
Connecticut, Jersey City, New Jersey and Houston, Texas and
international business from Barcelona, Spain, London, England,
and Miami, Florida.
Covenant
Underwriters
Covenant Underwriters, Ltd. is an underwriting agency based in
Covington, Louisiana with an office in New York, New York,
specializing in commercial marine insurance underwritten on
behalf of affiliated and unaffiliated insurance companies. It
has been in operation through predecessor entities since 1993.
HCC
Indemnity Guaranty Agency
HCC Indemnity Guaranty Agency, Inc. is an underwriting agency
based in New York, New York, specializing in writing insurance
and reinsurance related to various financial products. It writes
on behalf of affiliated insurance companies. It has been in
operation since 2004.
HCC
Underwriting Agency, Ltd. (UK)
HCC Underwriting Agency, Ltd. (UK) is a managing agent for two
Lloyds of London syndicates, Syndicates 4040 and
4141, which specialize in United Kingdom third party
liability, employers liability, and short-term medical
risks. One of our insurance companies is a participant in these
syndicates, with current participation of 87% in Syndicate 4040
and 100% in Syndicate 4141. We plan to use HCC Underwriting
Agency, Ltd. (UK) and its managed syndicates as a platform for
expanding our operations within the Lloyds of London
market. HCC Underwriting Agency, Ltd. (UK) has been in operation
since 2004.
MultiNational
Underwriters, LLC
MultiNational Underwriters, LLC, based in Indianapolis, Indiana,
is an underwriting agency specializing in domestic and
international short-term medical insurance, which is written
principally through an internet platform. The domestic business
is written on behalf of one of our domestic insurance companies
and the international business is written by Lloyds of
London Syndicate 4141, which is managed by one of our
subsidiaries and in which we have a 100% participation.
Reinsurance
and Insurance Broker Operations
Our reinsurance and insurance brokers provide a variety of
services, including marketing, placing, consulting on and
servicing insurance risks for their clients, which include
medium to large corporations, unaffiliated and affiliated
insurance and reinsurance companies, and other risk-taking
entities. The brokers earn commission income and, to a lesser
extent, fees for certain services, which are generally paid by
the underwriters with whom the business is placed. Some of these
risks may be initially underwritten by our insurance companies,
and they may retain a portion of the risk. Total revenue
generated by our brokers in 2008 amounted to $26.3 million.
Rattner
Mackenzie
Rattner Mackenzie Limited is a reinsurance broker based in
London, England. Rattner Mackenzie specializes in group life,
accident and health reinsurance and some specialty property and
casualty lines of business. It operates as a Lloyds of
London broker for insurance and reinsurance business placed on
behalf of unaffiliated and affiliated insurance companies,
reinsurance companies and underwriting agencies and has been in
operation since 1989.
Continental
Underwriters
Continental Underwriters Ltd. is an insurance broker based in
Covington, Louisiana, specializing in commercial marine
insurance and has been in operation since 1970.
Other
Operations
Other operating income consists of the following:
| equity in the earnings of mainly insurance-related companies in which we invest, | |
| dividends and interest from certain other insurance-related strategic investments and gains or losses from the disposition of these investments, | |
| income related to two mortgage impairment insurance contracts which, while written as insurance policies, receive accounting treatment as derivative financial instruments, | |
| income related to a mortgage guaranty reinsurance contract which is accounted for utilizing deposit accounting, | |
| the profit or loss from a portfolio of trading securities, and | |
| other miscellaneous income. |
Other operating income was $9.6 million in 2008 and
$43.5 million in 2007, and can vary considerably from
period to period depending on the amount of investment or
disposition activity. In the fourth quarter of 2006, we began
liquidating our trading portfolio, a process that was completed
in 2007 with the exception of two investment positions which
were sold in 2008. We invested the proceeds primarily in fixed
income securities.
Operating
Ratios
Premium
to Surplus Ratio
This table shows the ratio of statutory gross written premium
and net written premium to statutory policyholders surplus
for our property and casualty insurance companies (dollars in
thousands):
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross written premium
|
$ | 2,510,612 | $ | 2,460,498 | $ | 2,243,843 | $ | 2,049,116 | $ | 1,992,361 | ||||||||||
Net written premium
|
2,064,091 | 1,985,641 | 1,812,896 | 1,495,931 | 1,121,343 | |||||||||||||||
Policyholders surplus
|
1,852,684 | 1,744,889 | 1,342,054 | 1,110,268 | 844,851 | |||||||||||||||
Gross written premium ratio
|
135.5 | % | 141.0 | % | 167.2 | % | 184.6 | % | 235.8 | % | ||||||||||
Gross written premium industry average(1)
|
* | 160.7 | % | 171.0 | % | 192.7 | % | 201.6 | % | |||||||||||
Net written premium ratio
|
111.4 | % | 113.8 | % | 135.1 | % | 134.7 | % | 132.7 | % | ||||||||||
Net written premium industry average(1)
|
90.0 | %** | 84.2 | % | 90.4 | % | 99.8 | % | 108.5 | % |
(1) | Source: A.M. Best Company, Inc. | |
* | Not available | |
** | Estimated by A.M. Best Company, Inc. |
While there is no statutory requirement regarding a permissible
premium to policyholders surplus ratio, guidelines
established by the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners provide that a property and casualty
insurers annual statutory gross written premium should not
exceed 900% and net written premium should not exceed 300% of
its policyholders surplus. However, industry and rating
agency guidelines place these ratios at 300% and 200%,
respectively. Our property and casualty insurance companies have
maintained ratios lower than such guidelines.
Combined
Ratio GAAP
The underwriting experience of a property and casualty insurance
company is indicated by its combined ratio. The GAAP combined
ratio is a combination of the loss ratio (the ratio of incurred
losses and loss adjustment expenses to net earned premium) and
the expense ratio (the ratio of policy acquisition costs and
other underwriting expenses, net of ceding commissions, to net
earned premium). We calculate the GAAP combined ratio using
financial data derived from our consolidated financial
statements reported under accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (generally accepted
accounting principles). Our insurance companies GAAP loss
ratios, expense ratios and combined ratios are shown in the
following table:
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
Loss ratio
|
60.4 | % | 59.6 | % | 59.2 | % | 67.1 | % | 63.8 | % | ||||||||||
Expense ratio
|
25.0 | 23.8 | 25.0 | 26.1 | 26.7 | |||||||||||||||
Combined ratio GAAP
|
85.4 | % | 83.4 | % | 84.2 | % | 93.2 | % | 90.5 | % | ||||||||||
Combined
Ratio Statutory
The statutory combined ratio is a combination of the loss ratio
(the ratio of incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses to
net earned premium) and the expense ratio (the ratio of policy
acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses, net of ceding
commissions, to net written premium). We calculate the statutory
combined ratio using financial data derived from the combined
financial statements of our insurance company subsidiaries
reported in accordance with statutory accounting principles. Our
insurance companies statutory loss ratios, expense ratios
and combined ratios are shown in the following table:
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
Loss ratio
|
60.8 | % | 60.6 | % | 60.0 | % | 67.1 | % | 64.3 | % | ||||||||||
Expense ratio
|
24.3 | 23.9 | 24.0 | 25.5 | 26.7 | |||||||||||||||
Combined ratio Statutory
|
85.1 | % | 84.5 | % | 84.0 | % | 92.6 | % | 91.0 | % | ||||||||||
Industry average
|
104.7 | %* | 95.7 | % | 92.5 | % | 100.7 | % | 98.3 | % | ||||||||||
* | Estimated by A. M. Best Company, Inc. |
The statutory ratio data is not intended to be a substitute for
results of operations in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. We believe including this information is
useful to allow a comparison of our operating results with those
of other companies in the insurance industry. The source of the
industry average is A.M. Best Company, Inc. A.M. Best
Company, Inc. reports insurer performance based on statutory
financial data to provide more standardized comparisons among
individual companies and to provide overall industry
performance. This data is not an evaluation directed at
investors.
Reserves
Our net loss and loss adjustment expense reserves are composed
of reserves for reported losses and reserves for incurred but
not reported losses (which include provisions for potential
movement in reported losses, as well as for claims that have
occurred but have not yet been reported to us), less a reduction
for
reinsurance recoverables related to those reserves. Reserves are
recorded by product line and are undiscounted, except for
reserves related to acquisitions.
The process of estimating our loss and loss adjustment expense
reserves involves a considerable degree of judgment by
management and is inherently uncertain. The recorded reserves
represent managements best estimate of unpaid loss and
loss adjustment expense by line of business. Because we provide
insurance coverage in specialized lines of business that often
lack statistical stability, management considers many factors
and not just actuarial point estimates in determining ultimate
expected losses and the level of net reserves required and
recorded.
To record reserves on our lines of business, we utilize expected
loss ratios, which management selects based on the following:
| information used to price the applicable policies, | |
| historical loss information where available, | |
| any public industry data for that line or similar lines of business, | |
| an assessment of current market conditions, and | |
| a claim-by-claim review by management, where actuarial homogenous data is unavailable. |
Management also considers the point estimates and ranges
calculated by our actuaries, together with input from our
experienced underwriting and claims personnel. Because of the
nature and complexities of the specialized types of business we
insure, management may give greater weight to the expectations
of our underwriting and claims personnel, who often perform a
claim by claim review, rather than to the actuarial estimates.
However, we utilize the actuarial point and range estimates to
monitor the adequacy and reasonableness of our recorded reserves.
Each quarter, management compares recorded reserves to the most
recent actuarial point estimate and range for each line of
business. If the recorded reserves vary significantly from the
actuarial point estimate, management determines the reasons for
the variances and may adjust the reserves up or down to an
amount that, in managements judgment, is adequate based on
all of the facts and circumstances considered, including the
actuarial point estimates. We consistently maintain total
consolidated net reserves above the total actuarial point
estimate but within the actuarial range.
Our actuaries utilize standard actuarial techniques in making
their actuarial point estimates. These techniques require a high
degree of judgment, and changing conditions can cause
fluctuations in the reserve estimates. We believe that our
review process is effective, such that any required changes are
recognized in the period of change as soon as the need for the
change is evident. Reinsurance recoverables offset our gross
reserves based upon the contractual terms of our reinsurance
agreements.
With the exception of 2004, our net reserves historically have
shown favorable development except for the effects of losses
from commutations, which we have completed in the past and may
negotiate in the future. Commutations can produce adverse prior
year development since, under generally accepted accounting
principles, any excess of undiscounted reserves assumed over
assets received must be recorded as a loss at the time the
commutation is completed. Economically, the loss generally
represents the discount for the time value of money that will be
earned over the payout of the reserves; thus, the loss may be
recouped as investment income is earned on the assets received.
Based on our reserving techniques and our past results, we
believe that our net reserves are adequate.
The reserving process is intended to reflect the impact of
inflation and other factors affecting loss payments by taking
into account changes in historical payment patterns and
perceived trends. There is no precise method for the subsequent
evaluation of the adequacy of the consideration given to
inflation, or to any other specific factor, or to the way one
factor may impact another.
We underwrite risks that are denominated in a number of foreign
currencies and, therefore, maintain loss reserves with respect
to these policies in the respective currencies. These reserves
are subject to exchange rate
fluctuations, which may have an effect on our net earnings.
Generally, we match the reserves denominated in foreign
currencies with assets denominated in the same currency
resulting in a natural hedge that mitigates the effects of
exchange rate fluctuation.
The loss development triangles show changes in our reserves in
subsequent years from the prior loss estimates, based on
experience at the end of each succeeding year, on the basis of
generally accepted accounting principles. The estimate is
increased or decreased as more information becomes known about
the frequency and severity of losses for individual years. A
redundancy means the original estimate was higher than the
current estimate; a deficiency means that the current estimate
is higher than the original estimate.
The first line of each loss development triangle presents, for
the years indicated, our gross or net reserve liability,
including the reserve for incurred but not reported losses. The
first section of each table shows, by year, the cumulative
amounts of loss and loss adjustment expense paid at the end of
each succeeding year. The second section sets forth the
re-estimates in later years of incurred losses, including
payments, for the years indicated. The cumulative
redundancy (deficiency) represents, at the date indicated,
the difference between the latest re-estimated liability and the
reserves as originally estimated.
This loss development triangle shows development in loss
reserves on a gross basis (in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance sheet reserves
|
$ | 3,415,230 | $ | 3,227,080 | $ | 3,097,051 | $ | 2,813,720 | $ | 2,089,199 | $ | 1,525,313 | $ | 1,158,915 | $ | 1,132,258 | $ | 944,117 | $ | 871,104 | $ | 460,511 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve adjustments from acquisition and disposition of
subsidiaries
|
| 32,131 | 28,348 | 15,427 | 3,368 | | 5,587 | | (66,571 | ) | (32,437 | ) | (136 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted reserves
|
3,415,230 | 3,259,211 | 3,125,399 | 2,829,147 | 2,092,567 | 1,525,313 | 1,164,502 | 1,132,258 | 877,546 | 838,667 | 460,375 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative paid at:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One year later
|
902,352 | 797,217 | 689,126 | 511,766 | 396,077 | 418,809 | 390,232 | 400,279 | 424,379 | 229,746 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Two years later
|
1,260,672 | 1,077,954 | 780,130 | 587,349 | 548,941 | 612,129 | 537,354 | 561,246 | 367,512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three years later
|
1,385,011 | 993,655 | 772,095 | 659,568 | 726,805 | 667,326 | 611,239 | 419,209 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Four years later
|
1,144,350 | 866,025 | 823,760 | 803,152 | 720,656 | 686,730 | 435,625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Five years later
|
1,002,058 | 886,458 | 921,920 | 758,126 | 721,011 | 453,691 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six years later
|
1,003,780 | 1,009,049 | 835,994 | 725,639 | 462,565 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seven years later
|
1,101,393 | 924,803 | 752,733 | 462,126 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eight years later
|
964,763 | 817,615 | 464,748 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine years later
|
844,300 | 474,358 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ten years later
|
475,970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re-estimated liability at:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of year
|
3,415,230 | 3,259,211 | 3,125,399 | 2,829,147 | 2,092,567 | 1,525,313 | 1,164,502 | 1,132,258 | 877,546 | 838,667 | 460,375 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One year later
|
3,187,167 | 3,034,778 | 2,825,846 | 2,121,839 | 1,641,426 | 1,287,003 | 1,109,098 | 922,080 | 836,775 | 550,409 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Two years later
|
2,918,269 | 2,714,374 | 2,115,671 | 1,666,931 | 1,393,143 | 1,241,261 | 925,922 | 868,438 | 545,955 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three years later
|
2,631,477 | 2,028,501 | 1,690,729 | 1,464,448 | 1,384,608 | 1,099,657 | 854,987 | 547,179 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Four years later
|
2,002,477 | 1,619,744 | 1,506,360 | 1,455,046 | 1,102,636 | 900,604 | 537,968 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Five years later
|
1,639,621 | 1,453,674 | 1,480,193 | 1,135,143 | 887,272 | 522,183 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six years later
|
1,467,540 | 1,433,630 | 1,137,652 | 894,307 | 521,399 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seven years later
|
1,462,481 | 1,079,353 | 899,212 | 513,918 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eight years later
|
1,113,971 | 879,805 | 511,323 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine years later
|
881,947 | 497,774 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ten years later
|
493,167 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative redundancy (deficiency)
|
$ | 72,044 | $ | 207,130 | $ | 197,670 | $ | 90,090 | $ | (114,308 | ) | $ | (303,038 | ) | $ | (330,223 | ) | $ | (236,425 | ) | $ | (43,280 | ) | $ | (32,792 | ) |
The gross redundancies reflected in the above table for 2004
through 2007 resulted primarily from the following activity:
| Excluding certain runoff business described below, during 2008, we recorded favorable development of $106.2 million. Most of this was from our diversified financial products line of business on the 2005 and prior underwriting years, our London market account for the 2005 and prior accident years, and an |
assumed quota share program reported in our other specialty lines for the 2005 and prior accident years. These changes primarily affected the 2003 through 2006 accident years. |
| Excluding certain runoff business described below, during 2007, we recorded favorable development of $44.1 million. Most of this was from the 2003 and 2004 underwriting years in our diversified financial products line of business, which affected 2003 through 2005 accident years. | |
| During 2008, we recorded adverse development of $34.1 million on certain run-off assumed accident and health reinsurance business reported in our discontinued lines of business due to our continuing evaluation of reserves, primarily on the 2000 accident year. During 2007, we recorded favorable development of $46.5 million on the same run-off accident and health business. The combined effect of these entries was favorable development of $12.4 million. |
The gross deficiencies reflected in the above table for 1999
through 2003 resulted from the following:
| During 2005, 2004 and 2003, we recorded $49.8 million, $127.7 million and $132.9 million, respectively, in gross losses on certain run-off assumed accident and health reinsurance business reported in our discontinued lines of business, due to our processing of additional information received and our continuing evaluation of reserves on this business. Collectively, these transactions primarily affected the 1999, 2000 and 2001 accident years. | |
| The 2000 and 1999 years in the table were also adversely affected by late reporting loss information received during 2001 for certain other discontinued business. |
The gross reserves in the discontinued lines of business,
particularly with respect to run-off assumed accident and health
reinsurance business, produced substantial adverse development
from 2003 through 2005. This assumed accident and health
reinsurance is primarily excess coverage for large losses
related to workers compensation policies. Losses tend to
develop and affect excess covers considerably after the original
loss was incurred. Additionally, certain primary insurance
companies that we reinsured have experienced financial
difficulty and some of them are in liquidation, with guaranty
funds now responsible for administering the business. Losses
related to this business are historically late reporting. While
we attempt to anticipate these conditions in setting our gross
reserves, we have only been partially successful to date, and
there could be additional adverse development in these reserves
in the future. The gross losses that have developed adversely
have been substantially reinsured and, therefore, the net
effects have been much less.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the gross
liability for loss and loss adjustment expense payable on the
basis of generally accepted accounting principles (in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Gross reserves for loss and loss adjustment expense payable at
beginning of year
|
$ | 3,227,080 | $ | 3,097,051 | $ | 2,813,720 | ||||||
Gross reserve additions from acquired businesses
|
32,131 | 826 | 146,811 | |||||||||
Foreign currency adjustment
|
(102,777 | ) | 34,202 | 46,422 | ||||||||
Incurred loss and loss adjustment expense:
|
||||||||||||
Provision for loss and loss adjustment expense for claims
occurring in current year
|
1,707,538 | 1,443,031 | 1,222,139 | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in estimated loss and loss adjustment
expense for claims occurring in prior years*
|
(72,044 | ) | (90,621 | ) | (3,301 | ) | ||||||
Incurred loss and loss adjustment expense
|
1,635,494 | 1,352,410 | 1,218,838 | |||||||||
Loss and loss adjustment expense payments for claims occurring
during:
|
||||||||||||
Current year
|
474,346 | 460,192 | 439,614 | |||||||||
Prior years
|
902,352 | 797,217 | 689,126 | |||||||||
Loss and loss adjustment expense payments
|
1,376,698 | 1,257,409 | 1,128,740 | |||||||||
Gross reserves for loss and loss adjustment expense payable
at end of year
|
$ | 3,415,230 | $ | 3,227,080 | $ | 3,097,051 | ||||||
* | Changes in loss and loss adjustment expense reserves for losses occurring in prior years reflect the gross effect of the resolution of losses for other than the reserve value and the subsequent adjustments of loss reserves. |
The favorable development for 2008 related primarily to reserve
reductions in our diversified financial products line of
business on the 2005 and prior underwriting years, our London
market account for the 2005 and prior accident years, and an
assumed quota share program reported in our other specialty
lines for the 2005 and prior accident years. This was partially
offset by reserve increases on certain run-off assumed accident
and health business reported in our discontinued lines. The
favorable development for 2007 was caused by decreasing reserves
on the same run-off accident and health business, plus other
reductions primarily from our diversified financial products
line of business on the 2003 and 2004 underwriting years.
This loss development triangle shows development in loss
reserves on a net basis (in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reserves, net of reinsurance
|
$ | 2,416,271 | $ | 2,342,800 | $ | 2,108,961 | $ | 1,533,433 | $ | 1,059,283 | $ | 705,200 | $458,702 | $313,097 | $ | 249,872 | $ | 273,606 | $ | 118,912 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve adjustments from acquisition (disposition) of
subsidiaries
|
| 29,053 | 25,730 | 14,218 | 3,168 | | 5,587 | | (6,048 | ) | (3,343 | ) | (410 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect on loss reserves of 1999 write off of reinsurance
recoverables
|
| | | | | | | | | | 63,851 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted reserves, net of reinsurance
|
2,416,271 | 2,371,853 | 2,134,691 | 1,547,651 | 1,062,451 | 705,200 | 464,289 | 313,097 | 243,824 | 270,263 | 182,353 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative paid, net of reinsurance, at:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One year later
|
687,675 | 556,096 | 222,336 | 172,224 | 141,677 | 115,669 | 126,019 | 102,244 | 145,993 | 56,052 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Two years later
|
858,586 | 420,816 | 195,663 | 135,623 | 152,674 | 131,244 | 139,659 | 174,534 | 103,580 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three years later
|
588,659 | 337,330 | 124,522 | 115,214 | 163,808 | 118,894 | 185,744 | 113,762 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Four years later
|
424,308 | 217,827 | 88,998 | 93,405 | 138,773 | 180,714 | 121,293 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Five years later
|
313,315 | 155,708 | 59,936 | 158,935 | 197,416 | 120,452 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six years later
|
242,904 | 125,311 | 137,561 | 200,833 | 127,254 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seven years later
|
186,224 | 194,517 | 188,901 | 131,631 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eight years later
|
240,590 | 244,069 | 132,614 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine years later
|
251,180 | 142,815 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ten years later
|
142,975 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re-estimated liability, net of reinsurance, at:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of year
|
2,416,271 | 2,371,853 | 2,134,691 | 1,547,651 | 1,062,451 | 705,200 | 464,289 | 313,097 | 243,824 | 270,263 | 182,353 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One year later
|
2,289,482 | 2,108,294 | 1,541,125 | 1,087,845 | 735,678 | 487,403 | 306,318 | 233,111 | 260,678 | 186,967 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Two years later
|
1,997,867 | 1,514,632 | 1,087,123 | 770,497 | 500,897 | 338,194 | 222,330 | 254,373 | 175,339 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three years later
|
1,426,548 | 1,081,140 | 792,099 | 571,403 | 366,819 | 259,160 | 244,650 | 171,165 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Four years later
|
1,040,333 | 808,261 | 585,741 | 418,781 | 267,651 | 258,122 | 163,349 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Five years later
|
794,740 | 613,406 | 453,537 | 296,396 | 254,579 | 155,931 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six years later
|
597,666 | 462,157 | 305,841 | 271,563 | 157,316 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seven years later
|
455,279 | 311,344 | 277,841 | 156,376 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eight years later
|
307,262 | 279,412 | 155,016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine years later
|
274,668 | 159,514 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ten years later
|
151,261 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative redundancy (deficiency)
|
$ | 82,371 | $ | 136,824 | $ | 121,103 | $ | 22,118 | $ | (89,540 | ) | $ | (133,377 | ) | $ | (142,182 | ) | $ | (63,438 | ) | $ | (4,405 | ) | $ | 31,092 |
The net redundancies reflected in the above table for 2005
through 2007 resulted primarily from the following:
| Reserve reductions in 2008 from our diversified financial products line of business on the 2005 and prior underwriting years, our London market account for the 2005 and prior accident years, and an assumed quota share program reported in our other specialty lines for the 2005 and prior accident years. These changes primarily affected the 2003 through 2006 accident years. | |
| Reserve reductions in 2007 from the 2003 and 2004 underwriting years in our diversified financial products line of business, which primarily affected the 2003 through 2005 accident years. | |
| Reserve reductions in 2006 on prior year hurricanes and aviation, affecting primarily the 2004 and 2005 accident years. |
The net deficiencies reflected in the above table for 1999
through 2004 resulted primarily from activity on certain run-off
assumed accident and health business reported in our
discontinued lines of business, as follows:
| Commutation charges of $20.2 million, $26.0 million and $28.8 million recorded in 2006, 2005 and 2003, respectively. |
| Reserve strengthening of $27.3 million in 2004 to bring net reserves above our actuarial point estimate. | |
| Collectively, these transactions primarily affected the 1999, 2000 and 2001 accident years. |
The table below provides a reconciliation of the liability for
loss and loss adjustment expense payable, net of reinsurance
ceded, on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles
(in thousands):
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Net reserves for loss and loss adjustment expense payable at
beginning of year
|
$ | 2,342,800 | $ | 2,108,961 | $ | 1,533,433 | ||||||
Net reserve additions from acquired businesses
|
29,053 | 742 | 146,811 | |||||||||
Foreign currency adjustment
|
(82,677 | ) | 27,304 | 36,957 | ||||||||
Incurred loss and loss adjustment expense:
|
||||||||||||
Provision for loss and loss adjustment expense for claims
occurring in current year
|
1,294,244 | 1,210,344 | 1,018,382 | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in estimated loss and loss adjustment
expense for claims occurring in prior years*
|
(82,371 | ) | (26,397 | ) | (6,526 | ) | ||||||
Incurred loss and loss adjustment expense
|
1,211,873 | 1,183,947 | 1,011,856 | |||||||||
Loss and loss adjustment expense payments for claims occurring
during:
|
||||||||||||
Current year
|
397,103 | 422,058 | 397,760 | |||||||||
Prior years
|
687,675 | 556,096 | 222,336 | |||||||||
Loss and loss adjustment expense payments
|
1,084,778 | 978,154 | 620,096 | |||||||||
Net reserves for loss and loss adjustment expense payable at
end of year
|
$ | 2,416,271 | $ | 2,342,800 | $ | 2,108,961 | ||||||
* | Changes in loss and loss adjustment expense reserves for losses occurring in prior years reflect the net effect of the resolution of losses for other than the reserve value and the subsequent adjustments of loss reserves. |
The favorable development for 2008 related primarily to reserve
reductions in our diversified financial products line of
business on the 2005 and prior underwriting years, our London
market account for the 2005 and prior accident years, and an
assumed quota share program reported in our other specialty
lines for the 2005 and prior accident years. The favorable
development for 2007 related primarily to reserve reductions in
our diversified financial products line of business from the
2003 and 2004 underwriting years. The favorable development for
2006 related to a reduction in prior year hurricane reserves and
a reduction in aviation reserves, mostly offset by another
commutation charge on the run-off accident and health business.
Deficiencies and redundancies in the reserves occur as we
continually review our loss reserves with our actuaries,
increasing or reducing loss reserves as a result of such reviews
and as losses are finally settled and claims exposures are
reduced. We believe we have provided for all material net
incurred losses.
We write directors and officers, professional
indemnity and fiduciary liability coverage for public and
private companies and not-for-profit organizations and continue
to closely monitor our exposure to subprime and credit market
related issues. We also write trade credit business and provide
coverage for certain financial institutions, which have
potential exposure to shareholder lawsuits as a result of the
current economic environment. Based on our present knowledge, we
believe our ultimate losses from these coverages will be
contained within our current overall reserves for this business.
We have no material exposure to asbestos claims or environmental
pollution losses. Our largest insurance company subsidiary only
began writing business in 1981, and its policies normally
contain pollution exclusion clauses that limit pollution
coverage to sudden and accidental losses only, thus
excluding intentional dumping and seepage claims. Policies
issued by our other insurance company subsidiaries do not have
significant environmental exposures because of the types of
risks covered.
Enterprise
Risk Management
Our Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process provides us with a
structured process for identifying business opportunities as
well as downside risks or threats. This process enables us to
assess risks in a more transparent and consistent manner,
resulting in improved recognition, management and monitoring of
risk. With ERM, we are creating a risk awareness culture
throughout the organization that will allow us to continue to
achieve strong risk management practices. In support of our ERM
initiative, a Corporate Vice President who reports to the
President and her staff are responsible for the process. Our
Internal Risk Committee, composed of senior operating
management, oversees the process. Our Board of Directors has
established an Enterprise Risk Oversight Committee that monitors
the ERM process on behalf of the Board of Directors.
Regulation
The business of insurance is extensively regulated by the
government. At this time, the insurance business in the United
States is regulated primarily by the individual states.
Additional federal regulation of the insurance industry may
occur in the future.
Our business depends on our compliance with applicable laws and
regulations and our ability to maintain valid licenses and
approvals for our operations. We devote a significant effort to
obtain and maintain our licenses and to comply with the diverse
and complex regulatory structure. In all jurisdictions, the
applicable laws and regulations are subject to amendment or
interpretation by regulatory authorities. Generally, regulatory
authorities are vested with broad discretion to grant, renew and
revoke licenses and approvals and to implement regulations
governing the business and operations of insurers, insurance
agents, brokers and third party administrators.
Insurance
Companies
Our insurance companies are subject to regulation and
supervision by the states and by other jurisdictions in which
they do business. Regulation by the states varies, but generally
involves regulatory and supervisory powers exercised by a state
insurance official. In the United States, the regulation and
supervision of our insurance operations primarily entails:
| approval of policy forms and premium rates, | |
| licensing of insurers and their agents, | |
| periodic examinations of our operations and finances, | |
| prescription of the form and content of records of financial condition to be filed with the regulatory authority, | |
| required levels of deposits for the benefit of policyholders, | |
| requiring certain methods of accounting, | |
| requiring reserves for unearned premium, losses and other purposes, | |
| restrictions on the ability of our insurance companies to pay dividends, | |
| restrictions on the nature, quality and concentration of investments, | |
| restrictions on transactions between insurance companies and their affiliates, | |
| restrictions on the size of risks insurable under a single policy, and | |
| standards of solvency, including risk-based capital measurement (which is a measure developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners and used by state insurance regulators to identify insurance companies that potentially are inadequately capitalized). |
In the United States, state insurance regulations are intended
primarily for the protection of policyholders rather than
shareholders. The state insurance departments monitor compliance
with regulations through
periodic reporting procedures and examinations. The quarterly
and annual financial reports to the state insurance regulators
utilize statutory accounting principles, which are different
from the generally accepted accounting principles we use in our
reports to shareholders. Statutory accounting principles, in
keeping with the intent to assure the protection of
policyholders, are generally based on a liquidation concept,
while generally accepted accounting principles are based on a
going-concern concept.
In the United States, state insurance regulators classify direct
insurance companies and some individual lines of business as
admitted (also known as licensed)
insurance or non-admitted (also known as
surplus lines) insurance. Surplus lines insurance is
offered by non-admitted companies on risks that are not insured
in the particular state by admitted companies. All surplus lines
insurance is required to be written through licensed surplus
lines insurance brokers, who are required to be knowledgeable of
and to follow specific state laws prior to placing a risk with a
surplus lines insurer. Our insurance companies offer products on
both an admitted and surplus lines basis.
U.S. state insurance regulations also affect the payment of
dividends and other distributions by insurance companies to
their shareholders. Generally, insurance companies are limited
by these regulations in the payment of dividends above a
specified level. Dividends in excess of those thresholds are
extraordinary dividends and are subject to prior
regulatory approval. Many states require prior regulatory
approval for all dividends.
In the United Kingdom, the Financial Services Authority
supervises all securities, banking and insurance businesses,
including Lloyds of London. The Financial Services
Authority oversees compliance with established periodic auditing
and reporting requirements, risk assessment reviews, minimum
solvency margins, dividend restrictions, restrictions governing
the appointment of key officers, restrictions governing
controlling ownership interests and various other requirements.
All of our United Kingdom operations, including Houston Casualty
Company-London, are authorized and regulated by the Financial
Services Authority.
HCC Europe is domiciled in Spain and operates on the equivalent
of an admitted basis throughout the European Union.
HCC Europes primary regulator is the Spanish General
Directorate of Insurance and Pension Funds of the Ministry of
the Economy and Treasury (Dirección General de Seguros y
Fondos de Pensiones del Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda).
Underwriting
Agencies and Reinsurance and Insurance Brokers
In addition to the regulation of insurance companies, the states
impose licensing and other requirements on the underwriting
agency and service operations of our other subsidiaries. These
regulations relate primarily to:
| advertising and business practice rules, | |
| contractual requirements, | |
| financial security, | |
| licensing as agents, brokers, reinsurance brokers, managing general agents or third party administrators, | |
| limitations on authority, and | |
| recordkeeping requirements. |
Statutory
Accounting Principles
The principal differences between statutory accounting
principles for our domestic insurance company subsidiaries and
generally accepted accounting principles, the method by which we
report our consolidated financial results to our shareholders,
are as follows:
| a liability is recorded for certain reinsurance recoverables under statutory accounting principles whereas, under generally accepted accounting principles, there is no such provision unless the recoverables are deemed to be doubtful of collection, |
| certain assets that are considered non-admitted assets are eliminated from a balance sheet prepared in accordance with statutory accounting principles, but are included in a balance sheet prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, | |
| only some of the deferred tax asset is recognized under statutory accounting principles, | |
| fixed income investments classified as available for sale are recorded at market value for generally accepted accounting principles and at amortized cost under statutory accounting principles, | |
| outstanding losses and unearned premium are reported on a gross basis under generally accepted accounting principles and on a net basis under statutory accounting principles, and | |
| under statutory accounting principles, policy acquisition costs are expensed as incurred and, under generally accepted accounting principles, such costs are deferred and amortized to expense as the related premium is earned. |
Our international insurance company subsidiaries
accounting principles are prescribed by regulatory authorities
in each country. The prescribed principles do not vary
significantly from generally accepted accounting principles.
Insurance
Holding Company Acts
Because we are an insurance holding company, we are subject to
the insurance holding company system regulatory requirements of
a number of states. Under these regulations, we are required to
report information regarding our capital structure, financial
condition and management. We are also required to provide prior
notice to, or seek the prior approval of, insurance regulatory
authorities of certain agreements and transactions between our
affiliated companies. These agreements and transactions must
satisfy certain regulatory requirements.
Assessments
Many states require insurers licensed to do business in the
state to bear a portion of the loss suffered by some insureds as
a result of the insolvency of other insurers or to bear a
portion of the cost of insurance for high-risk or
otherwise uninsured individuals. Depending upon state law,
insurers can be assessed an amount that is generally limited to
between 1% and 2% of premiums written for the relevant lines of
insurance in that state. Part of these payments may be
recoverable through premium rates, premium tax credits or policy
surcharges. Significant increases in assessments could limit the
ability of our insurance subsidiaries to recover such
assessments through tax credits or other means. In addition,
there have been some legislative efforts to limit policy
surcharges or repeal the tax offset provisions. We cannot
predict the extent to which such assessments may increase or
whether there may be limits imposed on our ability to recover or
offset such assessments.
Insurance
Regulations Concerning Change of Control
Many state insurance regulatory laws contain provisions that
require advance approval by state agencies of any change of
control of an insurance company that is domiciled or, in some
cases, has substantial business in that state.
Control is generally presumed to exist through the
ownership of 10% or more of the voting securities of a domestic
insurance company or of any company that controls a domestic
insurance company. HCC owns, directly or indirectly, all of the
shares of stock of insurance companies domiciled in a number of
states. Any purchaser of shares of common stock representing 10%
or more of the voting power of our common stock will be presumed
to have acquired control of our domestic insurance subsidiaries
unless, following application by that purchaser, the relevant
state insurance regulators determine otherwise. Any transactions
that would constitute a change in control of any of our
individual insurance subsidiaries would generally require prior
approval by the insurance departments of the states in which the
insurance subsidiary is domiciled. Also, one of our insurance
subsidiaries is domiciled in the United Kingdom and another in
Spain. Insurers in those countries are also subject to change of
control restrictions under their individual regulatory
frameworks. These requirements may deter or delay possible
significant transactions in our common stock or
the disposition of our insurance companies to third parties,
including transactions which could be beneficial to our
shareholders.
Risk-Based
Capital
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners has
developed a formula for analyzing insurance companies called
risk-based capital. The risk-based capital formula is intended
to establish minimum capital thresholds that vary with the size
and mix of an insurance companys business and assets. It
is designed to identify companies with capital levels that may
require regulatory attention. At December 31, 2008, each of
our domestic insurance companies total adjusted capital
was significantly in excess of the authorized control level
risk-based capital.
Insurance
Regulatory Information System
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners has
developed a rating system, the Insurance Regulatory Information
System, primarily intended to assist state insurance departments
in overseeing the financial condition of all insurance companies
operating within their respective states. The Insurance
Regulatory Information System consists of eleven key financial
ratios that address various aspects of each insurers
financial condition and stability. Our insurance companies
Insurance Regulatory Information System ratios generally fall
within the usual prescribed ranges.
Terrorism
Risk Insurance Act
The Federal Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) was initially
enacted in 2002 for the purpose of ensuring the availability of
insurance coverage for certain acts of terrorism, as defined in
the TRIA. The Terrorism Risk Insurance Extension Act of 2005
extended TRIA through December 31, 2007. On
December 26, 2007, the President signed into law the
Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007
(Reauthorization Act). The Reauthorization Act extends the
program through December 31, 2014. A major provision of the
Reauthorization Act is the revision of the definition of
Act of Terrorism to remove the requirement that the
act of terrorism be committed by an individual acting on behalf
of any foreign person or foreign interest in order to be
certified under the Reauthorization Act. The Reauthorization Act
sets the Federal share of compensation (subject to a
$100.0 million program trigger) for program years
2008 2014 at 85%, excess of our retention level, up
to the maximum annual liability cap of $100.0 billion.
Under the Reauthorization Act, we are required to offer
terrorism coverage to our commercial policyholders in certain
lines of business, for which we may, when warranted, charge an
additional premium. The policyholders may or may not accept such
coverage. The Reauthorization Act also established a deductible
that each insurer would have to meet before Federal
reimbursement would occur. For 2009, our deductible is
approximately $100.7 million.
Legislative
Initiatives
In recent years, state legislatures have considered or enacted
laws that modify and, in many cases, increase state authority to
regulate insurance companies and insurance holding company
systems. State insurance regulators are members of the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners, which seeks to promote
uniformity of and to enhance the state regulation of insurance.
In addition, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners
and state insurance regulators, as part of the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners state insurance
department accreditation program and in response to new federal
laws, have re-examined existing state laws and regulations,
specifically focusing on insurance company investments, issues
relating to the solvency of insurance companies, licensing and
market conduct issues, streamlining agent licensing and policy
form approvals, adoption of privacy rules for handling
policyholder information, interpretations of existing laws, the
development of new laws and the definition of extraordinary
dividends.
In recent years, a variety of measures have been proposed at the
federal level to reform the current process of Federal and state
regulation of the financial services industries in the United
States, which include the banking, insurance and securities
industries. These measures, which are often referred to as
financial
services modernization, have as a principal objective the
elimination or modification of regulatory barriers to
cross-industry combinations involving banks, securities firms
and insurance companies. Also, the Federal government has from
time to time considered whether to impose overall federal
regulation of insurers. If so, we believe state regulation of
the insurance business would likely continue. This could result
in an additional layer of federal regulation. In addition, some
insurance industry trade groups are actively lobbying for
legislation that would allow an option for a separate Federal
charter for insurance companies. The full extent to which the
Federal government could decide to directly regulate the
business of insurance has not been determined by lawmakers.
State regulators in many states have initiated or are
participating in industry-wide investigations of sales and
marketing practices in the insurance industry. Such
investigations have resulted in restitution and settlement
payments by some companies and criminal charges against some
individuals. The investigations have led to changes in the
structure of compensation arrangements, the offering of certain
products and increased transparency in the marketing of many
insurance products. We have cooperated fully with any such
investigations and, based on presently available information, do
not expect any adverse results from such investigations.
We do not know at this time the full extent to which these
Federal or state legislative or regulatory initiatives will or
may affect our operations and no assurance can be given that
they would not, if adopted, have a material adverse effect on
our business or our results of operations.
Employees
At December 31, 2008, we had 1,864 employees. Of this
number, 946 are employed by our insurance companies, 625 are
employed by our underwriting agencies, 78 are employed by our
reinsurance and insurance brokers and 215 are employed at the
corporate headquarters and elsewhere. We are not a party to any
collective bargaining agreement and have not experienced work
stoppages or strikes as a result of labor disputes. We consider
our employee relations to be good.