Attached files

file filename
EX-31.1 - SECTION 302 CEO CERTIFICATION Q3 2009 - POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES INCq309ex31-1.htm
EX-32.1 - 32.1 CEO CERTIFICATION Q3 2009 - POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES INCq309ex32-1.htm
EX-32.1 - 32.2 CFO CERTIFICATION Q3 2009 - POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES INCq309ex32-2.htm
EX-31.1 - SECTION 302 CFO CERTIFICATION Q3 2009 - POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES INCq309ex31-2.htm

 
 



 
 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 
 
 
Form 10-Q

 
 
 
þ
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended September 27, 2009
 
OR
 
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from                      to                     
 
Commission File Number 000-21507

 

 
POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


 
 
 

 
Delaware
11-2723423
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
1801 E. St. Andrew Place, Santa Ana, CA 92705
(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)
 
(714) 466-1000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ    No  ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller-reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer  ¨        Accelerated filer  þ         Non-accelerated filer  ¨         Smaller reporting company  ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    
 
Yes  ¨    No  þ
 
As of October 28, 2009, the registrant had 132,359,006 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
 
 
 


 

 
1

 

POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2009
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
     
   
PAGE
   
   
     
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
     
     
   
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
   
SIGNATURES
   
 


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT RELATED TO FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, contains “forward-looking statements,” regarding future events and our future results that are subject to the safe harbors created under the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Act, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act.  All statements other than statements of historical facts are statements that could be deemed forward- looking statements as defined within Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act.  One generally can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “may,” “will,” “expects,” “intends,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “seeks,” or “continues,” or the negative thereof, or variations thereon, or similar terminology.  Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report include, but are not limited to, statements relating to revenue, revenue composition, market and economic conditions, demand and pricing trends, future expense levels, competition and growth prospects in our industry, trends in average selling prices and gross margins, product and infrastructure development, market demand and acceptance, the timing of and demand for next generation products, customer relationships, tax rates, employee relations, the timing of cash payments and cost savings from restructuring activities, restructuring charges, and the level of expected future capital and research and development expenditures. Such statements are generally included in the items captioned: “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” “Legal Proceedings,” and “Risk Factors.”  These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industry in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of our management.  The forward-looking statements made in this report, regarding future events and the future performance of Powerwave Technologies, Inc, which we refer to as Powerwave or the Company, involve risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially and adversely from those results currently anticipated.  Such risks and uncertainties may relate to, but are not limited to, our reliance upon a few customers to generate the majority of our revenues, continued economic weakness and uncertainty resulting from the worldwide economic crisis and tightening of the credit markets, continued reductions in demand for our products; difficulty in obtaining additional capital should we need to do so in the future; significant fluctuations in our sales and operating results, continuing declines in the sales prices for our products; the future growth of the wireless infrastructure communications market; our reliance on single sources or limited sources for key components and products, the risks surrounding our internal and contract manufacturing operations in Asia and Europe; operating in a highly-regulated industry; and the competitive nature of the wireless communications industry which is characterized by rapid technological change.  Because the risks and uncertainties discussed in this report and other important unanticipated factors may affect Powerwave’s operating results, past performance should not be considered as indicative of future performance, and investors should not use historical results to anticipate results or trends in future periods.  Reference is also made to the risks and uncertainties described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Readers should also carefully review the risk factors described in documents that Powerwave files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including subsequent Current Reports on Form 8-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Reports on Form 10-K, as we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.
 
HOW TO OBTAIN POWERWAVE SEC FILINGS
 
All reports filed by Powerwave with the SEC are available free of charge via EDGAR through the SEC website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the public may read and copy materials filed by the Company with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Powerwave also provides copies of its Current Reports on Form 8-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Proxy Statements at no charge to investors upon request and makes electronic copies of its most recently filed reports available through its website at www.powerwave.com as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material with the SEC. 


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)

   
September 27,
2009
 
December 28,
2008
ASSETS
           
Current assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
44,901
   
$
46,906
 
Restricted cash
   
2,616
     
3,433
 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for sales returns and doubtful accounts of $8,995 and $9,478, respectively
   
142,327
     
213,871
 
Inventories
   
69,843
     
81,098
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
   
31,666
     
25,303
 
Deferred income taxes
   
3,204
     
3,204
 
Total current assets
   
294,557
     
373,815
 
Property, plant and equipment, net
   
88,942
     
98,616
 
Intangible assets, net
   
830
     
3,803
 
Asset held for sale
   
3,889
     
4,845
 
Other assets
   
6,514
     
6,817
 
TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
394,732
   
$
487,896
 
                 
                 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
 
$
80,076
   
$
139,267
 
Accrued payroll and employee benefits
   
11,569
     
12,286
 
Accrued restructuring costs
   
1,973
     
5,813
 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
   
27,624
     
37,390
 
Total current liabilities
   
121,242
     
194,756
 
Long-term debt
   
280,887
     
306,321
 
Other liabilities
   
2,242
     
1,898
 
Total liabilities
   
404,371
     
502,975
 
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 9 and 10)
               
Shareholders’ deficit:
               
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued or outstanding
   
     
 
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 132,359,006 and 131,637,460 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
   
768,866
     
765,204
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income
   
11,483
     
14,245
 
Accumulated deficit
   
(789,988
)
   
(794,528
)
Net shareholders’ deficit
   
(9,639
)
   
(15,079
)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
 
$
394,732
   
$
487,896
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)

   
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
   
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
 
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
Net sales
 
$
139,048
   
$
237,960
   
$
424,904
   
$
709,903
 
Cost of sales:
                               
Cost of goods
   
101,938
     
179,633
     
316,487
     
537,486
 
Intangible asset amortization
   
624
     
4,094
     
1,870
     
16,459
 
Restructuring and impairment charges
   
328
     
3,368
     
1,738
     
13,903
 
Total cost of sales
   
102,890
     
187,095
     
320,095
     
567,848
 
Gross profit
   
36,158
     
50,865
     
104,809
     
142,055
 
Operating expenses: 
                               
Sales and marketing
   
8,069
     
10,301
     
26,665
     
36,064
 
Research and development
   
14,534
     
18,447
     
44,273
     
58,907
 
General and administrative
   
11,150
     
17,992
     
36,001
     
49,062
 
Intangible asset amortization
   
206
     
2,589
     
740
     
7,846
 
Restructuring and impairment charges
   
335
     
2,755
     
1,985
     
3,834
 
Total operating expenses
   
34,294
     
52,084
     
109,664
     
155,713
 
Operating income (loss)
   
1,864
     
(1,219
)
   
(4,855
)
   
(13,658
)
Other income (expense), net
   
(769
)
   
(42
)
   
10,950
     
(10,099
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
   
1,095
     
(1,261
)
   
6,095
     
(23,757
)
Income tax provision 
   
803
     
540
     
1,555
     
2,515
 
Net income (loss) 
 
$
292
   
$
(1,801
)
 
$
4,540
   
$
(26,272
)
Basic earnings (loss) per share: 
 
$
0.00
   
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.03
   
$
(0.20
)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: 
 
$
0.00
   
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.03
   
$
(0.20
)
Shares used in the computation of earnings (loss) per share:
                               
Basic
   
131,950
     
131,142
     
131,698
     
131,023
 
Diluted
   
135,058
     
131,142
     
133,665
     
131,023
 


















The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 


POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
   
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
 
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
Net income (loss) 
 
$
292
   
$
(1,801
)
 
$
4,540
   
$
(26,272
)
Other comprehensive loss: 
                               
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income taxes
   
(1,046
   
(34,542
)
   
(2,762
)
   
(6,627
)
Comprehensive income (loss) 
 
$
(754
 )
 
$
(36,343
)
 
$
1,778
   
$
(32,899
)

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.



POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
   
Nine Months Ended
   
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
           
Net income (loss)
 
$
4,540
   
$
(26,272
)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
   
18,384
     
41,414
 
Non-cash restructuring and impairment charges
   
3,722
     
17,737
 
Provision for sales returns and doubtful accounts
   
1,830
     
1,457
 
Provision for excess and obsolete inventories
   
6,068
     
3,237
 
Compensation costs related to stock-based awards
   
3,394
     
3,722
 
Gain on repurchase of convertible debt
   
(12,693
)
   
 
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment
   
(29
)
   
(588
)
Gain on settlement of litigation
   
(645
)
   
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
               
Accounts receivable
   
71,474
     
(20,122
)
Inventories
   
5,967
     
(5,133
)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
   
(5,152
)
   
7,814
 
Accounts payable
   
(67,060
)
   
32,253
 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
   
(19,335
)
   
(39,220
)
Other non-current assets
   
88
     
764
 
Other non-current liabilities
   
283
     
148
 
Net cash provided by operating activities                                                                                                
   
10,836
     
17,211
 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
   
(4,243
)
   
(7,501
)
Restricted cash
   
817
     
3,732
 
Proceeds from the sale of business
   
500
     
500
 
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment
   
323
     
4,305
 
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
   
1,960
     
(4,105
)
Net cash used in investing activities                                                                                                
   
(643
)
   
(3,069
)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
Debt issuance costs
   
(1,305
)
   
 
Proceeds from stock-based compensation arrangements
   
281
     
1,086
 
Repurchase of common stock
   
(13
)
   
(521
)
Retirement of short-term debt
   
     
(13,630
)
Retirement of long-term debt
   
(12,445
)
   
 
Net cash used in financing activities                                                                                                
   
(13,482
)
   
(13,065
)
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
   
1,284
     
(1,557
)
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
   
(2,005
)
   
(480
)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
   
46,906
     
58,151
 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
 
$
44,901
   
$
57,671
 
                 
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
               
Cash paid for:
               
Interest expense
 
$
4,853
   
$
5,417
 
Income taxes
 
$
5,876
   
$
18,633
 
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH ACTIVITIES:
               
Unpaid purchases of property and equipment                                                                                                
 
$
859
   
$
1,926
 



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

7

POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Note 1. Nature of Operations
 
Powerwave Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) is a global supplier of end-to-end wireless solutions for wireless communications networks. The Company designs, manufactures and markets antennas, boosters, combiners, filters, radio frequency power amplifiers, repeaters, tower-mounted amplifiers, remote radio head transceivers and advanced coverage solutions for use in cellular, PCS, 3G and 4G networks throughout the world.
 
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include certain footnotes and financial presentations normally required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. The interim financial information is unaudited; however, it reflects all normal adjustments and accruals which are in the opinion of management considered necessary to provide a fair presentation for the interim periods presented. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
 
The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the future quarters or the full year ending January 3, 2010 (“fiscal 2009”). The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008.
 
Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
 
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance now codified as FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. FASB ASC Topic 105 does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the FASB Codification will be considered non-authoritative. These provisions of FASB ASC Topic 105 are effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009 and, accordingly, are effective for the Company for the current fiscal reporting period. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have an impact on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition, but will impact the Company’s financial reporting process by eliminating all references to pre-codification standards. On the effective date of this Statement, the Codification superseded all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards, and all other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification became non-authoritative.
 
In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events,” which establishes general standards of accounting for, and disclosures of, events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This pronouncement is effective for interim or fiscal periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial position; however, the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 855 resulted in additional disclosures with respect to subsequent events.
 
In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” which amends previous guidance to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim as well as annual financial statements in the current economic environment. This pronouncement is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition; however, these provisions of FASB ASC Topic 820 resulted in additional disclosures with respect to the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments.

8

POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


 
In November 2008, the FASB issued guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other,” which applies to defensive intangible assets, which are acquired intangible assets that the acquirer does not intend to actively use but intends to hold to prevent its competitors from obtaining access to them. As these assets are separately identifiable, this pronouncement requires an acquiring entity to account for defensive intangible assets as a separate unit of accounting, and such assets should be amortized to expense over the period such assets diminish in value. Defensive intangible assets must be recognized at fair value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820. This pronouncement is effective for financial statements in the first quarter of 2009. The adoption of the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 350 did not have a material impact on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition.
 
In April 2008, the FASB issued guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other,” which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset.  The pronouncement was effective in the first quarter of 2009. The adoption of the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 350 did not have a material impact on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition.
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation,” which changes how business acquisitions are accounted for and changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. The provisions of FASB ASC Topic 810 were effective in the first quarter of 2009. The adoption of the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 810 did not have a material impact on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition.
 
New Accounting Pronouncements

 
In October 2009, the FASB issued an update to FASB ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition.”  This Accounting Standards Update (ASU), No. 2009-13, “Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements – A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force,” provides accounting principles and application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the arrangement should be separated, and the consideration allocated. This guidance eliminates the requirement to establish the fair value of undelivered products and services and instead provides for separate revenue recognition based upon management’s estimate of the selling price for an undelivered item when there is no other means to determine the fair value of that undelivered item. Previous accounting guidance required that the fair value of the undelivered item be the price of the item either sold in a separate transaction between unrelated third parties or the price charged for each item when the item is sold separately by the vendor. This was difficult to determine when the product was not individually sold because of its unique features. Under previous accounting guidance, if the fair value of all of the elements in the arrangement was not determinable, then revenue was deferred until all of the items were delivered or fair value was determined. This new approach is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this standard on its business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
Subsequent Events
 
The Company has evaluated activities through October 30, 2009, and all known subsequent events have been included in this report.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.”  Under the fair value recognition provision of FASB ASC Topic 718, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the award. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options granted according to the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model and a multiple option award approach. The fair value of restricted stock awards is based on the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant.

9

POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


 
Stock-based compensation expense was recognized as follows in the consolidated statement of operations (in thousands):
   
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
   
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
 
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
Cost of sales
 
$
284
   
$
260
   
$
887
   
$
753
 
Sales and marketing expenses
   
96
     
99
     
308
     
317
 
Research and development expenses
   
231
     
286
     
775
     
854
 
General and administrative expenses
   
597
     
462
     
1,424
     
1,797
 
Increase to operating loss before income taxes
   
1,208
     
1,107
     
3,394
     
3,721
 
Income tax benefit recognized
   
     
     
     
 
Impact on net income (loss)
 
$
1,208
   
$
1,107
   
$
3,394
   
$
3,721
 
Impact on earnings (loss) per share:
                               
Basic and diluted
 
$
0.01
   
$
0.01
   
$
0.03
   
$
0.03
 
 
As of September 27, 2009, unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of the Company’s stock-based awards and employee stock purchase plan was approximately $3.7 million, net of estimated forfeitures of $0.5 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years.
 
The Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation methods require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the weighted average risk-free interest rate, the expected life, and the expected stock price volatility. The weighted average risk-free interest rate was determined based upon actual U.S. treasury rates over a one to ten year horizon and the actual life of options granted. The Company grants options with either a five year or ten year life. The expected life is based on the Company’s actual historical option exercise experience. For the employee stock purchase plan, the actual life of 6 months is utilized in this calculation. The expected life was determined based upon actual option grant lives over a 10 year period. The Company has utilized various market sources to calculate the implied volatility factor utilized in the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model. These included the implied volatility utilized in the pricing of options on the Company’s Common Stock as well as the implied volatility utilized in determining market prices of the Company’s outstanding convertible notes. Using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model, the estimated weighted average fair value of options granted during the third quarter of fiscal years 2009 and 2008 was $0.76 per share and $2.25 per share, respectively.
 
 The fair value of options granted under the Company’s stock incentive plans during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 and 2008 was estimated on the date of grant according to the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model utilizing the multiple option approach and the following weighted-average assumptions:
 

   
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
   
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
 
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
Weighted average risk-free interest rate
   
1.6
%
   
2.8
%
   
1.7
%
   
2.8
%
Expected life (in years)
   
3.9
     
4.6
     
5.2
     
4.6
 
Expected stock volatility
   
89
%
   
53
%
   
139
%
   
55
%
Dividend yield
 
None
   
None
   
None
   
None
 


10

POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


 
Note 3. Supplemental Balance Sheet Information
 
Inventories
 
Inventories are as follows:
   
September 27,
2009
 
December 28,
2008
Parts and components
 
$
26,662
   
$
28,547
 
Work-in-process
   
857
     
2,618
 
Finished goods
   
42,324
     
49,933
 
Total inventories
 
$
69,843
   
$
81,098
 
 
Inventories are net of an allowance for excess and obsolete inventory of approximately $30.7 million and $43.4 million as of September 27, 2009 and December 28, 2008, respectively.
 
Asset Held For Sale
 
In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company completed the closure of its manufacturing facility in Salisbury, Maryland as part of its 2008 Restructuring Plan. The carrying value of the building has been separately presented in the accompanying balance sheet under the caption “Asset Held for Sale” and this asset is no longer being depreciated. During the first nine months of 2009, the Company recorded additional charges of $1.0 million to write the building down to its fair value less cost to sell in accordance with the accounting guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment.” FASB ASC Topic 360 requires entities to report discontinued operations separately from continuing operations, and extends that reporting to a component of equity that either has been disposed of (by sale, by abandonment, or in a distribution to owners) or is classified as held for sale. The Company signed a Purchase and Sale Agreement for the building in April 2009 and the sale of the building was completed on October 8, 2009.
 
Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities are as follows:
   
September 27,
2009
 
December 28,
2008
Accrued vendor cancellation costs
 
$
7,388
   
$
10,563
 
Accrued warranty costs
   
7,999
     
10,763
 
Other accrued expenses and other current liabilities
   
12,238
     
16,064
 
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 
$
27,625
   
$
37,390
 
 
Warranty
 
Accrued warranty costs are as follows:
   
Nine Months Ended
Description
 
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
Warranty reserve beginning balance
 
$
10,763
   
$
26,975
 
Reductions for warranty costs incurred
   
(8,841
)
   
(12,231
Warranty accrual related to current period sales
   
6,044
     
5,445
 
Settlement of previous warranty claims
   
     
(2,858
)
Change in estimate related to previous warranty accruals
   
     
(2,360
)
Effect of exchange rates
   
33
     
(130
)
Warranty reserve ending balance
 
$
7,999
   
$
14,841
 


11

POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


 
Note 4. Intangible Assets
 
Intangible assets are as follows:
 
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization:
 
September 27,
2009
 
December 28,
2008
Developed technology (net of accumulated amortization of $5,077 and $3,206, respectively)
 
$
623
   
$
2,494
 
Customer relationships (net of accumulated amortization of $1,682 and $3,479, respectively)
   
207
     
1,309
 
Intangible assets, net
 
$
830
   
$
3,803
 
 
Amortization expense related to intangible assets totaled $2.6 million and $24.3 million for the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The remaining $0.8 million of intangible assets will be fully amortized in the fourth quarter of 2009.
 
Note 5. Financing Arrangements and Long-Term Debt
 
In the first nine months of 2009, the Company repurchased $25.4 million in aggregate par value of its outstanding 1.875% convertible subordinated notes due November 2024, resulting in a gain of approximately $12.7 million on the purchase.  As of September 27, 2009, there is $130.9 million outstanding under the 1.875% convertible subordinated notes and $150.0 million outstanding under the 3.875% convertible subordinated notes.
 
On April 3, 2009, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), with Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, as arranger and administrative agent. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, Wells Fargo Foothill made available to the Company a senior secured revolving credit facility up to a maximum of $50.0 million. Availability under the Credit Agreement is based on the calculation of the Company’s borrowing base as defined in the Credit Agreement.  The Credit Agreement is secured by a first priority security interest on a majority of the Company’s assets, including without limitation, all accounts, equipment, inventory, chattel paper, records, intangibles, deposit accounts and cash and cash equivalents. The Credit Agreement expires on August 15, 2011. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants for credit facilities of this type, including limitations on the Company with respect to indebtedness, liens, investments, distributions, mergers and acquisitions and dispositions of assets.  The Credit Agreement also includes financial covenants including minimum EBITDA and maximum capital expenditures that are applicable only if the availability of the Company’s line of credit falls below $20.0 million. As of September 27, 2009, the Company is in compliance with all of these covenants.
 
On April 3, 2009, in connection with entering into the Credit Agreement referenced above, the Company terminated its Revolving Trade Receivables Purchase Agreement with Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent, as amended on May 15, 2008 (the “Amended Receivables Purchase Agreement”). As of the date of termination, the Company did not have any borrowings outstanding under the Amended Receivables Purchase Agreement. In addition, the Company did not incur any early termination penalties in connection with the termination of the Amended Receivables Purchase Agreement.
 
Note 6. Restructuring and Impairment Charges
 
2009 Restructuring Plan
 
In January 2009, the Company formulated and began to implement a plan to further reduce manufacturing overhead costs and operating expenses. As part of this plan, the Company initiated personnel reductions in both its domestic and foreign locations, with primary reductions in the United States, Estonia and Sweden. These reductions were undertaken in response to current economic conditions and the global macro-economic slowdown that began in the fourth quarter of 2008. The Company expects to finalize the plan in the fourth quarter of 2009.

12

POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


 
A summary of the activity affecting the accrued restructuring liability related to the 2009 Restructuring Plan for the first nine months of 2009 is as follows:
 

   
Workforce Reductions
 
Facility Closures
 & Equipment Write-downs
 
Total
Balance at December 28, 2008
 
$
   
$
   
$
 
Amounts accrued
   
1,973
     
77
     
2,050
 
Amounts paid/incurred
   
(1,530
)
   
(77
)
   
(1,607
)
Effects of exchange rates
   
     
     
 
Balance at September 27, 2009
 
$
443
     
     
443
 

 
The costs associated with these exit activities were recorded in accordance with the accounting guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 420, “Exit or Disposal Obligations.”  Pursuant to this guidance, a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity shall be recognized in the period in which the liability is incurred, except for a liability for one-time employee termination benefits that is incurred over time.  In the unusual circumstance in which fair value cannot be reasonably estimated, the liability shall be recognized initially in the period in which fair value can be reasonably estimated. The restructuring and integration plan is subject to continued future refinement as additional information becomes available. The Company expects that the workforce reduction amounts will be paid through the first quarter of 2010.
 
2008 Restructuring Plan
 
In June 2008, the Company formulated and began to implement a plan to further consolidate operations and reduce manufacturing and operating expenses. As part of this plan, the Company closed its Salisbury, Maryland manufacturing facility and transferred most of the production to its other manufacturing operations. In addition, the Company closed its design and development center in Bristol, UK and discontinued manufacturing operations in Kempele, Finland. These actions were finalized in the first quarter of 2009.
 
A summary of the activity affecting the accrued restructuring liability related to the 2008 Restructuring Plan for the first nine months of 2009 is as follows:
 
   
Workforce Reductions
 
Facility Closures
 & Equipment Write-downs
 
Total
Balance at December 28, 2008
 
$
3,106
   
$
585
   
$
3,691
 
Amounts accrued
   
594
     
126
     
720
 
Amounts paid/incurred
   
(3,634
)
   
(372
)
   
(4,006
)
Effects of exchange rates
   
151
     
64
     
215
 
Balance at September 27, 2009
 
$
217
     
403
     
620
 

 
The costs associated with these exit activities were recorded in accordance with the accounting guidance in FASB ASC Topic 420. The restructuring and integration plan is subject to continued future refinement as additional information becomes available. The Company expects that the workforce reductions will be paid out through the fourth quarter of 2009, and the facility closure amounts will be paid out over the remaining lease term, which extends through September 2010.
 
2007 Restructuring Plan
 
In the second quarter of 2007, the Company formulated and began to implement a plan to further consolidate operations and reduce operating costs. As part of this plan, the Company closed its design and development centers in El Dorado Hills, California and Toronto, Canada, and discontinued its design and development center in Shipley, UK. Also as part of this plan, the Company sold its manufacturing operations located in Hungary to Sanmina SCI, a third party contract manufacturing supplier, and entered into a manufacturing services agreement with Sanmina SCI. The transaction included inventories and fixed assets and included a sublease of the existing facility, along with the assumption of certain liabilities, including all transferred employees. The Company finalized this plan in the fourth quarter of 2007.

13

POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


 
A summary of the activity affecting the accrued restructuring liability related to the 2007 Restructuring Plan for the first nine months of 2009 is as follows:
 

   
Facility Closures
 & Equipment Write-downs
Balance at December 28, 2008
 
$
551
 
Amounts accrued
   
(179
)
Amounts paid/incurred
   
(388
)
Effects of exchange rates
   
16
 
Balance at September 27, 2009
 
$
 

 
The costs associated with these exit activities were recorded in accordance with the accounting guidance in FASB ASC Topic 420. The remaining payments on this plan were made in the third quarter of 2009, and all actions associated with this plan have been completed.
 
2006 Plan for Consolidation of Operations
 
In the fourth quarter of 2006, and in connection with the Filtronic plc wireless acquisition, the Company formulated and began to implement a plan to restructure its global manufacturing operations, including the consolidation of its manufacturing facilities in Wuxi and Shanghai, China, into the manufacturing facility located in Suzhou, China. The plan includes a reduction of workforce, impairment and disposal of inventory and equipment utilized in discontinued product lines, and facility closure costs. In addition, the Company also ceased the production of certain product lines manufactured at these facilities to eliminate duplicative product lines.
 
A summary of the activity affecting the accrued restructuring liability related to the 2006 Plan for Consolidation of Operations for the first nine months of 2009 is as follows:
 

   
Facility Closures
 & Equipment Write-downs
Balance at December 28, 2008
 
$
146
 
Amounts accrued
   
175
 
Amounts paid/incurred
   
(321
)
Effects of exchange rates
   
 
Balance at September 27, 2009
 
$
 

 
The costs associated with these exit activities were recorded in accordance with the accounting guidance in FASB ASC Topic 420.  The remaining payments on this plan were made in the second quarter of 2009, and all actions associated with this plan have been completed.
 
Integration of LGP Allgon and REMEC, Inc.’s Wireless Systems Business
 
The Company recorded liabilities in connection with the acquisitions for estimated restructuring and integration costs related to the consolidation of REMEC, Inc.’s wireless systems business and LGP Allgon’s operations, including severance and future lease obligations on excess facilities. These estimated costs were included in the allocation of the purchase consideration and resulted in additional goodwill pursuant to the accounting guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations.”  The costs associated with these exit activities were recorded in accordance with the accounting guidance in FASB ASC Topic 420. The implementation of the restructuring and integration plan is complete.

14

POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


 
A summary of the activity affecting the accrued restructuring liability related to the integration of the REMEC, Inc.’s wireless systems business and LGP Allgon for the first nine months of 2009 is as follows:
 

   
Facility Closures
 & Equipment Write-downs
Balance at December 28, 2008
 
$
1,425
 
Amounts accrued
   
 
Amounts paid/incurred
   
(515
)
Effects of exchange rates
   
 
Balance at September 27, 2009
 
$
910
 

 
The Company expects that the facility closure amounts will be paid out over the remaining lease term which extends through January 2011.
 
Restructuring and Impairment Charges
 
In the first nine months of 2009, the Company recorded charges of approximately $1.0 million to write down the Salisbury, Maryland building to its fair value less the cost to sell. The Company also incurred severance charges of $2.6 million related to personnel reductions primarily in the United States, Finland and Sweden and $0.1 million of facility closure expenses.  The aggregate of all such charges was $3.7 million of which approximately $1.7 million was included in cost of sales and approximately $2.0 million was included in operating expenses.
 
In the first nine months of 2008, the Company recorded charges of approximately $8.6 million for the impairment of inventory at closed or consolidated facilities that either has been or will be disposed of and is not expected to generate future revenue. Included in these charges is $4.7 million and $3.3 million, respectively, of inventory charges related to the closure of the Company’s facilities in China and Salisbury, Maryland. The Company also incurred charges of $0.9 million for professional fees related to the Company’s restructuring plans. In addition, the Company recorded lease cancellation charges of $2.0 million associated with the closure of the Company’s facilities in Bristol, UK and Hungary, charges of $2.2 million related to impairment charges and fees associated with the closure of the Company’s entities in Salisbury, Maryland, Bristol, UK, Costa Rica and Hungary, and incurred certain vendor cancellation charges of $0.6 million related to closed facilities in China. Also in the first nine months of 2008, the Company incurred severance costs of $3.4 million which related to its restructuring plans. The aggregate of all such charges was $17.7 million of which $13.9 million was included in cost of sales and $3.8 million was included in operating expenses.
 
Note 7. Other Income (Expense), Net
 
The components of other income (expense), net, are as follows:
 

   
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
   
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
 
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
Interest income
 
$
62
   
$
191
   
$
531
   
$
430
 
Interest expense
   
(2,661
)
   
(2,983
)
   
(8,399
)
   
(8,372
)
Foreign currency gain (loss), net
   
1,687
     
2,582
     
4,751
     
(3,227
)
Gain on repurchase of convertible debt
   
     
     
12,693
     
 
Other income, net
   
143
     
168
     
1,374
     
1,070
 
Totalother income (expense), net
 
$
(769
)
 
$
(42
)
 
$
10,950
   
$
(10,099
)


15

POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


 
Other income (expense), net, for the nine months ended September 27, 2009 includes a gain of approximately $12.7 million related to the repurchase of approximately $25.4 million in aggregate par value of the Company’s outstanding 1.875% convertible subordinated notes due 2024.  We recognized net foreign currency gains and losses in the above periods primarily due to fluctuations between the U.S. Dollar and the Euro, Swedish Krona, Chinese RMB and Indian Rupee.
 
Note 8. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
 
In accordance with the accounting guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share,” basic earnings (loss) per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is based upon the weighted average number of common and potential common shares for each period presented and income available to common stockholders is adjusted to reflect any changes in income or loss that would result from the issuance of the dilutive common shares. The Company’s potential common shares include stock options under the treasury stock method and convertible subordinated debt under the if-converted method. Potential common shares of 29,023,841 and 29,746,025 related to the Company’s stock option programs and convertible debt have been excluded from diluted weighted average common shares for the three and nine months ended September 27, 2009, as the effect would be anti-dilutive.  Potential common shares of 35,695,340 and 36,504,974 related to the Company’s stock option programs and convertible debt have been excluded from diluted weighted average common shares for the three and nine months ended September 28, 2008.
 
The following details the calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
   
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
 
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
Basic:
                       
Net income (loss)
 
$
292
   
$
(1,801
)
 
$
4,540
   
$
(26,272
)
Weighted average common shares
   
131,950
     
131,142
     
131,698
     
131,023
 
Basic earnings (loss) per share
 
$
0.00
   
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.03
   
$
(0.20
)
Diluted:
                               
Net income (loss)
 
$
292
   
$
(1,801
)
 
$
4,540
   
$
(26,272
)
Interest expense of convertible debt, net of tax
   
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss), as adjusted
 
$
292
   
$
(1,801
)
 
$
4,540
   
$
(26,272
)
Weighted average common shares
   
131,950
     
131,142
     
131,698
     
131,023
 
Potential common shares
                               
Employee stock options                                                             
   
2,832
     
     
1,767
     
 
Restricted stock                                                             
   
276
     
     
200
     
 
Weighted average common shares, as adjusted
   
135,058
     
131,142
     
133,665
     
131,023
 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
 
$
0.00
   
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.03
   
$
(0.20
)
 


16

POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies
 
In the first quarter of 2007, four purported shareholder class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against the Company, its President and Chief Executive Officer, its former Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors and its Chief Financial Officer. The complaints were Jerry Crafton v. Powerwave Technologies, Inc., et. al., Kenneth Kwan v. Powerwave Technologies, Inc., et. al., Achille Tedesco v. Powerwave Technologies, Inc., et. al. and Farokh Etemadieh v. Powerwave Technologies, Inc. et. al. and were brought under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. In June 2007, the four cases were consolidated into one action before the Honorable Judge Philip Gutierrez, and a lead plaintiff was appointed. In October 2007, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint asserting the same causes of action and purporting to state claims on behalf of all persons who purchased Powerwave securities between May 2, 2005 and November 2, 2006. The essence of the allegations in the amended complaint was that the defendants made misleading statements or omissions concerning the Company’s projected and actual sales revenues, the integration of certain acquisitions and the sufficiency of the Company’s internal controls. In December 2007, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint.  On April 17, 2008, the Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims in connection with the Company’s projected sales revenues, but denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ other claims.  On August 29, 2008, the defendants answered the amended complaint. On May 14, 2009, the parties executed a stipulation of settlement to resolve the consolidated action. According to the terms of the proposed settlement, the settlement payment will be funded by the Company’s directors and officers liability insurance.  The Court granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement and provisionally certified a settlement class on June 22, 2009, and on October 19, 2009 entered a judgment that granted final approval of the settlement.
 
In March 2007, one additional lawsuit that relates to the pending shareholder class action was filed. The lawsuit, Cucci v. Edwards, et al., filed in the Superior Court of California, is a shareholder derivative action, purported to be brought by an individual shareholder on behalf of Powerwave, against current and former directors of Powerwave. Powerwave is also named as a nominal defendant. The allegations of the derivative complaint closely resemble those in the class action and pertain to the time period of May 2, 2005 through October 9, 2006. Based on those allegations, the derivative complaint asserts various claims for breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, mismanagement, and insider trading under state law. The derivative complaint was removed to federal court, and is also pending before Judge Gutierrez. On May 15, 2009, the parties executed a stipulation of settlement to resolve the derivative action.  According to the terms of the proposed settlement, the Company will adopt certain enhancements to its corporate governance policies and procedures and counsel for the derivative plaintiff will be reimbursed its legal fees and expenses, which will be funded by the Company’s directors and officers liability insurance. The Court granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement on June 22, 2009, and on October 19, 2009 entered a judgment that granted final approval of the settlement.
 
The Company is subject to other legal proceedings and claims in the normal course of business.  The Company is currently defending these proceedings and claims, and, although the outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain presently, the Company anticipates that it will be able to resolve these matters in a manner that will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
Note 10. Contractual Guarantees and Indemnities
 
During the normal course of its business, the Company makes certain contractual guarantees and indemnities pursuant to which the Company may be required to make future payments under specific circumstances. The Company has not recorded any liability for these contractual guarantees and indemnities in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. A description of significant contractual guarantees and indemnities existing as of September 27, 2009 is included below:
 
Intellectual Property Indemnities
 
The Company indemnifies certain customers and its contract manufacturers against liability arising from third-party claims of intellectual property rights infringement related to the Company’s products. These indemnities appear in development and supply agreements with the Company’s customers as well as manufacturing service agreements with the Company’s contract manufacturers, are not limited in amount or duration and generally survive the expiration of the contract. Given that the amount of any potential liabilities related to such indemnities cannot be determined until an infringement claim has been made, the Company is unable to determine the maximum amount of losses that it could incur related to such indemnifications. Historically, any amounts payable pursuant to such intellectual property indemnifications have not had a material effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

17

POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


 
Director and Officer Indemnities and Contractual Guarantees
 
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and executive officers which require the Company to indemnify such individuals to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. The Company’s indemnification obligations under such agreements are not limited in amount or duration. Certain costs incurred in connection with such indemnifications may be recovered under certain circumstances under various insurance policies. Given that the amount of any potential liabilities related to such indemnities cannot be determined until a lawsuit has been filed against a director or executive officer, the Company is unable to determine the maximum amount of losses that it could incur relating to such indemnifications. Historically, any amounts payable pursuant to such director and officer indemnifications have not had a material negative effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
The Company has also entered into severance agreements and change in control agreements with certain of its executives. These agreements provide for the payment of specific compensation benefits to such executives upon the termination of their employment with the Company.
 
General Contractual Indemnities/Products Liability
 
During the normal course of business, the Company enters into contracts with customers where it has agreed to indemnify the other party for personal injury or property damage caused by the Company’s products. The Company’s indemnification obligations under such agreements are not limited in duration and are generally not limited in amount. Historically, any amounts payable pursuant to such contractual indemnities have not had a material negative effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. The Company maintains product liability insurance as well as errors and omissions insurance which may provide a source of recovery to the Company in the event of an indemnification claim.
 
Other Guarantees and Indemnities
 
The Company occasionally issues guarantees for certain contingent liabilities under various contractual arrangements, including customer contracts, self-insured retentions under certain insurance policies, and governmental value-added tax compliance programs. These guarantees normally take the form of standby letters of credit issued by the Company’s banks, which may be secured by cash deposits or pledges, or performance bonds issued by an insurance company. Historically, any amounts payable pursuant to such guarantees have not had a material negative effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, the Company, as part of the agreements to register the convertible notes it issued in September 2007, November 2004, and July 2003, agreed to indemnify the selling security holders against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. The Company’s indemnification obligations under such agreements are not limited in duration and generally not limited in amount.
 
Note 11. Income Taxes
 
The Company provides for income taxes in interim periods based on the estimated effective income tax rate for the complete fiscal year. The income tax provision is computed on the pretax income of the consolidated entities located within each taxing jurisdiction based on current tax law. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the future tax consequences associated with temporary differences between income and expenses reported for financial accounting and tax reporting purposes. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is recorded to the extent that the Company cannot determine that the ultimate realization of the net deferred tax assets is more likely than not.
 
Realization of deferred tax assets is principally dependent upon the achievement of future taxable income, the estimation of which requires significant management judgment. The Company’s judgment regarding future profitability may change due to many factors, including future market conditions and the Company’s ability to successfully execute its business plans and/or tax planning strategies. These changes, if any, may require material adjustments to these deferred tax asset balances. Due to uncertainties surrounding the realization of the Company’s cumulative federal and state net operating losses and other factors, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance against a portion of its gross deferred tax assets. For the foreseeable future, the Federal tax provision related to future earnings will be offset substantially by a reduction in the valuation allowance. Accordingly, current and future tax expense will consist primarily of certain required state income taxes and taxes in certain foreign jurisdictions.

18

POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


 
In addition to unrecognized tax benefits, the Company has recorded valuation allowances against its net tax benefits in certain jurisdictions arising from net operating losses. On a quarterly basis, the Company reassesses the need for these valuation allowances based on operating results and its assessment of the likelihood of future taxable income and developments in the relevant tax jurisdictions. The Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets in the U.S. and various foreign jurisdictions in 2009 where the Company believes it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized.
 
As of September 27, 2009, the liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax positions was $10.0 million, including accrued penalties, interest, and foreign currency fluctuations of $0.5 million.  Of this amount, $7.9 million, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate.  In the first quarter of 2009, approximately $1.1 million of the liability was reduced as a result of the expiration of the statutory audit period of the tax jurisdiction.  Interest charges associated with all relevant uncertain tax positions were recorded for the period and all other changes to the liability were immaterial.
 
As a result of ongoing tax audits, the total liability for unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next twelve months due to either settlement of audits or expiration of statutes of limitations.  As of September 27, 2009, the Company has concluded all United States federal income tax matters for years through 2005. The Company is currently involved in tax audits with the United States for fiscal year 2006 and Finland for fiscal years 2007 and 2008.  All other material state, local and foreign income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2005.
 
Note 12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments has been determined using available market information and valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required in estimating fair values. Accordingly, the estimates may not be indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange.
 
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it was practicable to estimate that value.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
 
The carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short maturity (less than 90 days) and high credit quality of these instruments.
 
Long-Term Debt
 
The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the debt.  The Company’s long-term debt consists of convertible subordinated notes, which are not actively traded as an investment instrument and therefore, the quoted market prices may not reflect actual sales prices at which these notes would be traded.  The Company values these instruments at their stated par value, which represents the principal amount due at maturity, as well as the amount upon which interest expense is based. The stated par value of these notes equals their carrying value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
 
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows:
 

   
September 27, 2009
   
December 28, 2008
 
   
Carrying Amount
   
Fair
Value
   
Carrying Amount
   
Fair
Value
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
44,901
     
44,901
   
$
46,906
   
$
46,906
 
Restricted cash
   
2,616
     
2,616
     
3,433
     
3,433
 
Long-term debt, including current portion
                               
3.875% Convertible Subordinated Noted due 2027
   
150,000
     
92,250
     
150,000
     
35,805
 
1.875% Convertible Subordinated Noted due 2024
   
130,887
     
105,691
     
156,321
     
37,189
 
 


19

POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Note 13. Gain on Settlement of Litigation
 
As part of the Company’s acquisition of REMEC, Inc’s wireless systems business, $15 million of the purchase price was held in escrow to cover any potential indemnification claims. In March 2009, the Company settled a dispute arising out of certain claims made against the escrow. As a result of this settlement, the Company received approximately $2 million in cash. This payment was accounted for as an adjustment to the total consideration paid for this acquisition. As a result, the remaining net book value of the intangible assets and fixed assets acquired in this acquisition was eliminated and the Company recorded a net gain of approximately $0.6 million. This amount is included in other income (expense), net in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
 
Note 14. Customer Concentrations
 
The Company’s product sales have historically been concentrated in a small number of customers. For the three and nine months ended September 27, 2009, sales to customers that accounted for 10% or more of revenues totaled $57.7 million and $194.8 million, respectively. For the three months ended September 27, 2009, sales to Nokia Siemens accounted for 31% of total revenues, and sales to Samsung accounted for 11% of total revenues.  For the first nine months of 2009, sales to Nokia Siemens accounted for approximately 35% of total revenues, and sales to Alcatel-Lucent accounted for approximately 11% of total revenues.  For the three and nine months ended September 28, 2008, sales to customers that accounted for 10% or more of revenues totaled $110.3 million and $330.1 million, respectively. For the three months ended September 28, 2008, sales to Nokia Siemens accounted for 32% of total revenues, and sales to Alcatel-Lucent accounted for 14% of total revenues.  For the first nine months of 2008, sales to Nokia Siemens accounted for approximately 30% of revenues, and sales to Alcatel-Lucent accounted for approximately 17% of revenues.
 
As of September 27, 2009, approximately 38% of total accounts receivable related to customers that accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s total revenue during the three months ended September 27, 2009. Nokia Siemens and Samsung accounted for approximately 32% and 6%, respectively, of the Company’s total accounts receivable.  The inability to collect outstanding receivables from these customers or any other significant customers, the delay in collecting outstanding receivables within the contractual payment terms, or the loss of, or reduction in sales to any of these customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
Note 15. Supplier Concentrations
 
Certain of the Company’s products, as well as components utilized in such products, are available in the short-term only from a single or a limited number of sources. In addition, in order to take advantage of volume pricing discounts, the Company purchases certain customized components from single-source suppliers as well as finished products from single-source contract manufacturers. The inability to obtain single-source components or finished products in the amounts needed on a timely basis or at commercially reasonable prices could result in delays in product introductions, interruption in product shipments or increases in product costs, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations until alternative sources could be obtained at a reasonable cost.
 
Note 16. Segments and Geographic Data
 
The Company operates in one reportable business segment: “Wireless Communications.” The Company’s revenues are derived from the sale of wireless communications network products and coverage solutions, including antennas, boosters, combiners, filters, radio frequency power amplifiers, repeaters, tower-mounted amplifiers, remote radio head transceivers and advanced coverage solutions for use in cellular, PCS, 3G and 4G wireless communications networks throughout the world.
 
The Company manufactures multiple product categories at its manufacturing locations and produces certain products at more than one location. With regard to sales, the Company sells its products through two major sales channels. The largest channel is the original equipment manufacturer channel, which consists of large global companies such as Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Huawei, Motorola, Nokia Siemens and Samsung. The other major channel is direct to wireless network operators such as AT&T, Bouygues, Orange, Sprint, Verizon Wireless and Vodafone. A majority of the Company’s products are sold to both sales channels. The Company maintains global relationships with most of its customers. The Company’s original equipment manufacturer customers normally purchase on a global basis and the sales to these customers, while recognized in various reporting regions, are managed on a global basis. For network operator customers, where they have a global presence, the Company typically maintains a global purchasing agreement. Individual sales are also made on a regional basis.
 
The Company measures its performance by monitoring its net sales by product and consolidated gross margins, with a short-term goal of maintaining a positive operating cash flow while striving to achieve long-term operating profits.


ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included under Item 1, Financial Statements (Unaudited). This discussion contains forward-looking statements, the realization of which may be impacted by certain important factors including, but not limited to, those discussed in Risk Factors, in Part II, Item 1A included herein.
 
Introduction and Overview
 
Powerwave Technologies, Inc., which is referred to herein as “we,” “us” or “our,” is a global supplier of end-to-end wireless solutions for wireless communications networks. Our business consists of the design, manufacture, marketing and sale of products to improve coverage, capacity and data speed in wireless communication networks, including antennas, boosters, combiners, filters, radio frequency power amplifiers, remote radio head transceivers, repeaters, tower-mounted amplifiers and advanced coverage solutions. These products are utilized in major wireless networks throughout the world that support voice and data communications by use of cell phones and other wireless communication devices. We sell our products to both original equipment manufacturers, who incorporate our products into their proprietary base stations (which they then sell to wireless network operators), and directly to individual wireless network operators for deployment into their existing networks.
 
During the last decade, demand for wireless communications infrastructure equipment has fluctuated dramatically. While demand for wireless infrastructure was strong during 2005, it weakened for Powerwave during 2006 and 2007 due to significant reductions in demand from three of our major customers, as well as a general slowdown in overall demand within the wireless infrastructure industry. For the first three quarters of 2008, demand once again increased; however, starting in the fourth quarter of 2008 and carrying over into 2009, demand for our products has been negatively impacted by the global economic recession and credit crisis.  These events have led to reduced capital spending and lower demand for our products, which has negatively impacted our financial results. During 2008 and the first nine months of 2009, we implemented several cost cutting initiatives aimed at lowering our operating expenses and manufacturing cost structure. These initiatives will continue and we may be required to further reduce operating expenses if there continues to be reduced demand from our customers and reduced spending in the wireless communications industry generally.
 
In the past there have been significant slowdowns in capital spending by wireless network operators due to delays in the expected deployment of infrastructure equipment and financial difficulties on the part of the wireless network operators who were forced to consolidate and reduce spending to strengthen their balance sheets and improve their profitability. Economic conditions, such as the turmoil in the global equity and credit markets, as well as the global recession and the rise of inflationary pressures related to rising commodity prices, have also had a negative impact on capital spending by wireless network operators, and will likely have a negative impact going forward in the near term. All of these factors can have a significant negative impact on overall demand for wireless infrastructure products, and at various times, have directly reduced demand for our products and increased price competition within our industry, which has led to reductions in our revenues and contributed to our reported operating losses. During fiscal 2006 and 2007, we experienced a significant slowdown in demand from one of our direct network operator customers, AT&T, as well as reduced demand from several of our original equipment manufacturing customers, including Nokia Siemens and Nortel Networks, all of which combined, directly reduced demand for our products and contributed to our operating losses for both fiscal 2006 and 2007.  During the first nine months of 2009, we have again experienced a significant reduction in demand from our customers that we believe is directly related to the global economic crisis and recession.
 
We believe that we have maintained our competitive position within the wireless communications infrastructure equipment market during this period of changing demand for wireless communication infrastructure equipment. We continue to invest in the research and development of wireless communications network technology and the diversification of our product offerings, and we believe that we have one of our industry’s leading product portfolios in terms of performance and features. We believe that our proprietary design technology is a further differentiator for our products.


 
Looking back over the last several years, beginning in fiscal 2004 we focused on cost savings while we expanded our market opportunities, as evidenced by our acquisition of LGP Allgon. This acquisition involved the integration of two companies based in different countries that previously operated independently, which was a complex, costly and time-consuming process. During fiscal 2005, we continued to focus on cost savings while we expanded our market opportunities, as evidenced by our acquisition of selected assets and liabilities of REMEC, Inc.’s wireless systems business. We believe that this acquisition further strengthened our position in the global wireless infrastructure market. In October 2006, we completed the Filtronic plc wireless acquisition. We believe that this strategic acquisition provided us with the leading position in transmit and receive filter products, as well as broadened our RF conditioning and base station solutions product portfolio and added significant additional technology to our intellectual property portfolio. For fiscal years 2007 and 2008, we focused on finalizing and implementing our plans to integrate this acquisition, consolidate operations and reduce our overall cost structure. During this same time, we encountered a significant unanticipated reduction in revenues, which caused us to revise our integration and consolidation plans with a goal of further reducing our operating costs and significantly lowering our breakeven operating structure. As has been demonstrated during the last five years, these acquisitions do not provide any guarantee that our revenues will increase.  During the fall of 2008 and continuing through 2009, the world’s economies have been impacted by the global credit crisis which combined to cause a worldwide recession, which has severely impacted our markets and significantly reduced demand for our products.  We currently have a number of ongoing restructuring activities which are aimed at further reducing our overall operating cost structure and positioning us to return to improved profitability when market conditions improve.
 
We measure our success by monitoring our net sales by product and consolidated gross margins, with a short-term goal of maintaining a positive operating cash flow while striving to achieve long-term operating profits. We believe that there continues to be long-term growth opportunities within the wireless communications infrastructure marketplace, and we are focused on positioning Powerwave to benefit from these long-term opportunities.
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based on our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which has been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The preparation of these financial statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate these estimates and assumptions, including those related to revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves, warranty obligations, vendor cancellation reserves, restructuring reserves, asset impairment, income taxes and stock-based compensation expense. We base these estimates on our historical experience and on various other factors which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the amounts of certain expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. These estimates and assumptions by their nature involve risks and uncertainties, and may prove to be inaccurate. In the event that any of our estimates or assumptions are inaccurate in any material respect, it could have a material adverse effect on our reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
 
For a summary of our significant accounting policies and estimates, see Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2008.
 
Accruals for Restructuring and Impairment Charges
 
In the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, we recorded restructuring and impairment charges of approximately $3.7 million and $17.7 million, respectively. Such charges relate to our 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Restructuring Plans. See further discussion of these plans in Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item I, Financial Information.


 
All of these restructuring and impairment accruals related primarily to workforce reductions, consolidation of facilities, and discontinuation of certain product lines, including the associated write-downs of inventory, manufacturing and test equipment, and certain intangible assets. These accruals were based on estimates and assumptions made by management about matters which were uncertain at the time, including the timing and amount of sublease income that would be recovered on vacated property and the net realizable value of used equipment that is no longer needed in our continuing operations. While we used our best current estimates based on facts and circumstances available at the time to quantify these charges, different estimates could reasonably be used in the relevant periods to arrive at different accruals and/or the actual amounts incurred or recovered may be substantially different from the assumptions utilized, either of which could have a material impact on the presentation of our financial condition or results of operations for a given period. As a result, we periodically review the estimates and assumptions used and reflect the effects of those revisions in the period that they become known.
 
New Accounting Pronouncements and Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
 
For a summary of our New Accounting Pronouncements and Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements, see Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item I, Financial Information.
 
Subsequent Events
 
We have evaluated activities through October 30, 2009, and all known subsequent events have been included in this report.
 



 
Results of Operations
 
The following table summarizes Powerwave’s results of operations as a percentage of net sales for the three and nine months ended September 27, 2009 and September 28, 2008:
 

   
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
   
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
 
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
Net sales
   
100.0
%
   
100.0
%
   
100.0
%
   
100.0
%
Cost of sales:
                               
Cost of goods
   
73.3
     
75.5
     
74.5
     
75.7
 
Intangible asset amortization
   
0.5
     
1.7
     
0.4
     
2.3
 
Restructuring and impairment charges
   
0.2
     
1.4
     
0.4
     
2.0
 
Total cost of sales
   
74.0
     
78.6
     
75.3
     
80.0
 
Gross profit
   
26.0
     
21.4
     
24.7
     
20.0
 
Operating expenses:
                               
Sales and marketing
   
5.8
     
4.3
     
6.3
     
5.1
 
Research and development
   
10.5
     
7.7
     
10.4
     
8.3
 
General and administrative
   
8.0
     
7.6
     
8.5
     
6.9
 
Intangible asset amortization
   
0.2
     
1.1
     
0.2
     
1.1
 
Restructuring and impairment charges
   
0.2
     
1.2
     
0.4
     
0.5
 
Total operating expenses
   
24.7
     
21.9
     
25.8
     
21.9
 
Operating income (loss)
   
1.3
     
(0.5
)
   
(1.1
)
   
(1.9
)
Other income (expense), net
   
(0.5
)
   
0.0
     
2.5
     
(1.4
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
   
0.8
     
(0.5
)
   
1.4
     
(3.3
)
Income tax provision
   
0.6
     
0.3
     
0.3
     
0.4
 
Net income (loss) 
   
0.2
%
   
(0.8
)%
   
1.1
%
   
(3.7
)%
 

 
Three Months ended September 27, 2009 and September 28, 2008
 
Net Sales
 
Our sales are derived from the sale of wireless communications network products and coverage solutions, including antennas, boosters, combiners, filters, radio frequency power amplifiers, remote radio head transceivers, repeaters, tower-mounted amplifiers and advanced coverage solutions for use in cellular, PCS, 3G and 4G wireless communications networks throughout the world.
 
The following table presents a further analysis of our sales based upon our various customer groups:
 

   
Three Months Ended
(in thousands)
Customer Group
 
September 27, 2009
 
September 28, 2008
Wireless network operators and other
 
$
57,892
     
42 
%
 
$
97,382
     
41 
%
Original equipment manufacturers
   
81,156
     
58 
%
   
140,578
     
59 
%
Total
 
$
139,048
     
100 
%
 
$
237,960
     
100 

 
Sales decreased by 42% to $139.0 million for the third quarter of 2009, from $238.0 million, for the third quarter of 2008.  This decrease was due to several factors, including decreased demand from both our network operator customers and our original equipment manufacturer customers, which decreased by approximately 41% and 42%, respectively, for the third quarter of 2009 from the third quarter of 2008. The decreases were primarily due to significantly reduced demand related to the global macro-economic crisis and associated global credit crisis and economic recession that began in the fall of 2008. This economic instability and the tight credit markets have impacted our customers’ demand for products throughout the first nine months of 2009.


 
 The following table presents a further analysis of our sales based upon our various product groups:
 

   
Three Months Ended
(in thousands)
Wireless Communications Product Group
 
September 27, 2009
 
September 28, 2008
Antenna systems
 
$
37,423
     
27 
%
 
$
75,352
     
32 
%
Base station systems
   
79,673
     
57 
%
   
142,880
     
60 
%
Coverage systems
   
21,952
     
16 
%
   
19,728
     
%
Total
 
$
139,048
     
100 
%
 
$
237,960
     
100 

 
Antenna systems consist of base station antennas and tower-mounted amplifiers. Base station systems consist of products that are installed into or around the base station of wireless networks and include products such as boosters, combiners, filters, radio frequency power amplifiers and VersaFlex cabinets. Coverage systems consist primarily of repeaters and advanced coverage solutions. The decrease in antenna systems and base station systems sales as listed in the table above is due to the significantly reduced demand related to the global economic crisis and recession impacting both our original equipment manufacturer and network operator customers during the third quarter of 2009 as compared with the third quarter of 2008.  The increase in coverage systems is primarily due to a large coverage solutions project that commenced near the end of the second quarter of 2009.
 
We track the geographic location of our sales based upon the location of our customers to which we ship our products. However, since many of our original equipment manufacturer customers purchase products from us at central locations and then re-ship the product with other base station equipment to locations throughout the world, we are unable to identify the final installation location of many of our products.
 
The following table presents an analysis of our net sales based upon the geographic area to which a product was shipped:
 

   
Three Months Ended
(in thousands)
Geographic Area
 
September 27, 2009
 
September 28, 2008
Americas
 
$
48,414
     
35 
%
 
$
70,504
     
30 
%
Asia Pacific
   
53,477
     
38 
%
   
99,977
     
42 
%
Europe
   
31,128
     
23 
%
   
64,614
     
27 
%
Other international
   
6,029
     
%
   
2,865
     
%
Total
 
$
139,048
     
100 
%
 
$
237,960
     
100 

 
Revenues decreased in all regions in the third quarter of 2009 as compared with the third quarter of 2008 with the exception of the “other international” category. The increase in revenues in the “other international” category largely represents increased revenues in the Middle East region. The decrease in the other regions was largely due to contraction in both the network operator channel and the original equipment manufacturer sales channel, resulting from the global macro-economic crisis and recession. Since wireless network infrastructure spending is dependent on individual network coverage and capacity demands, we do not believe that our revenue fluctuations for any geographic region are necessarily indicative of a trend for our future revenues by geographic area. In addition, as noted above, growth in one geographic location may not reflect actual demand growth in that location due to the centralized buying processes of our original equipment manufacturer customers.
 
A large portion of our revenues are generated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. During the last year, the value of the U.S. Dollar has fluctuated significantly against many other currencies. We have calculated that when comparing exchange rates in effect for the third quarter of 2008 to those in effect for the third quarter of 2009, the change in the value of foreign currencies as compared with the U.S. Dollar had a negative impact on our revenues for the third quarter of 2009 of less than one percent.  This impact did not have a material impact on our net sales.  We are unable to predict the future impact of such currency fluctuations on our future results.


 
For the third quarter of 2009, total sales to Nokia Siemens accounted for approximately 31% of sales and sales to Samsung accounted for approximately 11% of sales.  For the third quarter of 2008, total sales to Nokia Siemens accounted for approximately 32% of sales, and sales to Alcatel-Lucent accounted for approximately 14% of sales for the quarter. Notwithstanding our acquisitions, our business remains largely dependent upon a limited number of customers within the wireless communications market, and we cannot guarantee that we will continue to be successful in attracting new customers or retaining or increasing business with our existing customers.
 
A number of factors have caused delays and may cause future delays in new wireless infrastructure and upgrade deployment schedules throughout the world, including those in the United States, Europe, Asia, South America and other areas. In addition, a number of factors may cause original equipment manufacturers to alter their outsourcing strategies concerning certain wireless communications network products, which could cause such original equipment manufacturers to reduce or eliminate their demand for external supplies of such products or shift their demand to alternative suppliers or internal suppliers. Such factors include lower perceived internal manufacturing costs and competitive reasons to remain vertically integrated. Due to the possible uncertainties associated with wireless infrastructure deployments and original equipment manufacturer demand, we have experienced and expect to continue to experience significant fluctuations in demand from our original equipment manufacturer and network operator customers. Such fluctuations have caused and may continue to cause significant reductions in our revenues and/or operating results, which has adversely impacted and may continue to adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
Cost of Sales and Gross Profit
 
Our cost of sales includes both fixed and variable cost components and consists primarily of materials, assembly and test labor, overhead, which includes equipment and facility depreciation, transportation costs, warranty costs and amortization of product-related intangibles. Components of our fixed cost structure include test equipment and facility depreciation, purchasing and procurement expenses and quality assurance costs. Given the fixed nature of such costs, the absorption of our overhead costs into inventory decreases and the amount of overhead variances expensed to cost of sales increases as volumes decline since we have fewer units to absorb our overhead costs against. Conversely, the absorption of our overhead costs into inventory increases and the amount of overhead variances expensed to cost of sales decreases as volumes increase since we have more units to absorb our overhead costs against. As a result, our gross profit margins generally decrease as revenue and volumes decline due to lower sales volume and higher amounts of overhead variances expensed to cost of sales. Our gross profit margins generally increase as our revenue and volumes increase due to higher sales volume and lower amounts of overhead variances expensed to cost of sales.
 
The following table presents an analysis of our gross profit:
 

   
Three Months Ended
(in thousands)
   
September 27, 2009
 
September 28, 2008
Net sales
 
$
139,048
     
100.0
%
 
$
237,960
     
100.0 
%
Cost of sales:
                               
Cost of sales
   
101,938
     
73.3
%
   
179,633
     
75.5 
%
Intangible amortization
   
624
     
0.5
%
   
4,094
     
1.7 
%
Restructuring and impairment charges
   
328
     
0.2
%
   
3,368
     
1.4 
%
Total cost of sales
   
102,890
     
74.0
%
   
187,095
     
78.6 
%
Gross profit
 
$
36,158
     
26.0
%
 
$
50,865
     
21.4 
%
 
Our actual total gross profit decreased during the third quarter of 2009, compared with the third quarter of 2008, primarily as a result of our decreased revenues. As a percentage of revenue, our gross profit margin increased during the third quarter of 2009 compared with the third quarter of 2008 due primarily to reduced overhead costs within cost of goods sold due to our restructuring activities over the last year, and lower amortization and restructuring costs. The decrease in the intangible amortization costs is due to the intangible asset impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 (see Note 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part II, Item 8, and Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008). We incurred minimal restructuring and impairment charges in cost of sales during the third quarter of fiscal 2009.  For the third quarter of 2008, we incurred restructuring and impairment charges in cost of sales totaling $3.4 million.


 
The wireless communications infrastructure equipment industry is extremely competitive and is characterized by rapid technological change, new product development and product obsolescence, evolving industry standards and significant price erosion over the life of a product. Certain of our competitors have aggressively lowered prices in an attempt to gain market share. Due to these competitive pressures and the pressures of our customers to continually lower product costs, we expect that the average sales prices of our products will continue to decrease and negatively impact our gross margins. In addition, we have introduced new products at lower sales prices and these lower sales prices have impacted the average sales prices of our products. We have also reduced prices on our existing products in response to our competitors and customer demands. We currently expect that pricing pressures will remain strong in our industry. Future pricing actions by our competitors and us may adversely impact our gross profit margins and profitability, which could result in decreased liquidity and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
We continue to strive for manufacturing and engineering cost reductions to offset pricing pressures on our products, as evidenced by our prior decisions to close or transfer our Salisbury, Maryland, Finland, Hungary, Shanghai and Wuxi, China manufacturing operations as part of our restructuring plans to reduce our manufacturing costs. However, we cannot guarantee that these cost reductions and our outsourcing or product redesign efforts will keep pace with price declines and cost increases. If we are unable to further reduce our costs through our manufacturing, outsourcing and/or engineering efforts, our gross margins and profitability will be adversely affected. See “Our average sales prices have declined…” and “Our reliance on contract manufacturers exposes us to risks…” under Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors.
 
Operating Expenses
 
The following table presents a breakdown of our operating expenses by functional category and as a percentage of
 
net sales:
 

   
Three Months Ended
(in thousands)
   
September 27, 2009
 
September 28, 2008
Operating Expenses
                               
Sales and marketing
 
$
8,069
     
5.8 
%
 
$
10,301
     
4.3 
%
Research and development
   
14,534
     
10.5 
%
   
18,447
     
7.7 
%
General and administrative
   
11,150
     
8.0 
%
   
17,992
     
7.6 
%
Intangible amortization
   
206
     
0.2 
%
   
2,589
     
1.1 
%
Restructuring and impairment charges
   
335
     
0.2 
%
   
2,755
     
1.2 
%
Total operating expenses
 
$
34,294
     
24.7 
%
 
$
52,084
     
21.9 
%

 
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of sales salaries and commissions, travel expenses, advertising and marketing expenses, selling expenses, customer demonstration unit expenses and trade show expenses. Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $2.2 million, or 22%, during the third quarter of 2009 as compared with the third quarter of 2008. The decrease was due primarily to lower personnel costs resulting from restructuring actions taken in the last year, lower bad debt expense and lower trade show expenses.  In addition, expenses for the third quarter of 2008 include an employee bonus accrual of $0.1 million.  No bonuses have been accrued during fiscal 2009.
 
Research and development expenses consist primarily of ongoing design and development expenses for new wireless communications network products, as well as for advanced coverage solutions. We also incur design expenses associated with reducing the cost and improving the manufacturability of our existing products. Research and development expenses can fluctuate dramatically from period to period depending on numerous factors including new product introduction schedules, prototype developments and hiring patterns. Research and development expenses decreased by $3.9 million, or 21%, during the third quarter of 2009 as compared with the third quarter of 2008, due primarily to restructuring actions taken in the last year and lower professional fees for outsourced research and development costs.  Also contributing to the decrease in research and development expenses were lower material expenses used in research and development activities.  In addition, expenses for the third quarter of 2008 include an employee bonus accrual of $0.6 million.  No bonuses have been accrued during fiscal 2009.


 
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and other expenses for management, finance, information systems, legal fees, facilities and human resources. General and administrative expenses decreased by $6.8 million, or 38%, during the third quarter of 2009 as compared with the third quarter of 2008. This decrease was due primarily to reduced payroll resulting from personnel reductions taken in the last year from our restructuring activities and lower tax, audit and professional fees.  In addition, expenses for the third quarter of 2008 include an employee bonus accrual of $0.7 million.  No bonuses have been accrued during fiscal 2009.
 
Amortization of customer-related intangibles from our acquisitions, amounted to $0.2 million for the third quarter of 2009, compared with $2.6 million for the third quarter of 2008 (see Note 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part II, Item 8, and Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008).  The decreased amortization expense for the third quarter of 2009 was a result of the intangible asset impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008, which led to lower amortization in 2009.
 
Restructuring charges of $0.3 million were recorded in the third quarter of 2009, primarily related to severance costs in the United States, compared with charges of $2.8 million in the third quarter of 2008.
 
Other Income (Expense), net
 
The following table presents an analysis of other income (expense), net:
 

   
Three Months Ended
(in thousands)
   
September 27, 2009
 
September 28, 2008
Interest income
 
$
62
     
0.1
%
 
$
191
     
0.1 
%
Interest expense
   
(2,661
   
(1.9
)%
   
(2,983
)
   
(1.3 
)% 
Foreign currency gain
   
1,687
     
1.2
%
   
2,582
     
1.1 
%
Other income, net
   
143
     
0.1
%
   
168
     
0.1 
%
Other expense, net
 
$
(769
   
(0.5
)%
 
$
(42
)
   
(0.0 
)% 

 
Interest income decreased during the third quarter of 2009 as compared with the third quarter of 2008 primarily due to lower average cash balances and lower interest rates. Interest expense decreased during the third quarter of 2009 as compared to the third quarter of 2008, primarily due to the repurchases of approximately $69 million of convertible subordinated notes during the last twelve months. For the third quarter of 2009, we recognized a net foreign currency gain of $1.7 million primarily due to foreign currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the Euro, Swedish Krona, Chinese RMB and Indian Rupee, compared to the third quarter of 2008 when we recognized a foreign currency gain of $2.6 million.
 
Income Tax Provision
 
Our effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2009 was an expense of approximately 73.3% of our pre-tax income of $1.1 million. We have recorded a valuation allowance against a portion of our deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of the timing and ultimate realization of those assets. As such, for the foreseeable future, the tax provision or tax benefit related to future U.S. earnings or losses will be offset substantially by a reduction in the valuation allowance. For the third quarter of 2009, we recorded an income tax benefit for losses from jurisdictions where the tax benefits will be realized or offset by permanent differences.  The benefit recorded was offset by tax expense from operations in foreign jurisdictions, primarily China, and additional tax expense associated with uncertain tax positions.  We expect our tax rate to continue to fluctuate based on the percentage of income earned in each jurisdiction.


 
Net Income (Loss)
 
The following table presents a reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net income (loss):
 
   
Three Months Ended
(in thousands)
   
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
Operating income (loss) 
 
$
1,864
   
$
(1,219
)
Other expense, net
   
(769
)
   
(42
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
   
1,095
     
(1,261
)
Income tax provision
   
803
     
540
 
Net income (loss) 
 
$
292
   
$
(1,801
)
 
Our net income for the third quarter of 2009 was $0.3 million, compared with a net loss of $1.8 million for the third quarter of 2008. The increase in our net income during the third quarter of 2009 compared with the net loss in the third quarter of 2008 is the result primarily of lower intangible asset amortization costs resulting from prior year asset impairments and lower restructuring and impairment charges when compared to the prior year period.
 
Nine Months ended September 27, 2009 and September 28, 2008
 
Net Sales
 
The following table presents a further analysis of our sales based upon our various customer groups:
 
 
 
   
Nine Months Ended
(in thousands)
Customer Group
 
September 27, 2009
 
September 28, 2008
Wireless network operators and other
 
$
154,274
     
36 
%
 
$
278,162
     
39 
%
Original equipment manufacturers
   
270,630
     
64 
%
   
431,741
     
61 
%
Total
 
$
424,904
     
100 
%
 
$
709,903
     
100 

 
Sales decreased by approximately 40% to $424.9 million for the first nine months of 2009, from $709.9 million, for the first nine months of 2008.  This decrease was due to lower demand from both our network operator customers and our original equipment manufacturer customers, which decreased by approximately 45% and 37%, respectively, for the first nine months of 2009 from the first nine months of 2008. The decreases were primarily due to significantly reduced demand related to the global macro-economic crisis and associated global credit crisis and economic recession that began in the fall of 2008. We believe that this economic instability and the tight credit markets have impacted our customers’ demand for products throughout the first nine months of 2009.
 
The following table presents a further analysis of our sales based upon our various product groups:
 

   
Nine Months Ended
(in thousands)
Wireless Communications Product Group
 
September 27, 2009
 
September 28, 2008
Antenna systems
 
$
104,932
     
25 
%
 
$
195,788
     
28 
%
Base station systems
   
278,466
     
65 
%
   
444,180
     
62 
%
Coverage systems
   
41,506
     
10 
%
   
69,935
     
10 
%
Total
 
$
424,904
     
100 
%
 
$
709,903
     
100 

 
The decrease in all three of our product groups is due to the significantly reduced demand related to the global economic crisis impacting both our original equipment manufacturer and network operator customers during the first nine months of 2009 as compared with the first nine months of 2008.


 
The following table presents an analysis of our net sales based upon the geographic area to which a product was shipped:
   
Nine Months Ended
(in thousands)
Geographic Area
 
September 27, 2009
 
September 28, 2008
Americas
 
$
125,896
     
29 
%
 
$
239,669
     
34 
%
Asia Pacific
   
160,749
     
38 
%
   
235,572
     
33 
%
Europe
   
108,990
     
26 
%
   
215,738
     
30 
%
Other international
   
29,269
     
%
   
18,924
     
%
Total
 
$
424,904
     
100 
%
 
$
709,903
     
100 
 
Revenues decreased in all regions in the first nine months of 2009 as compared with the first nine months of 2008 with the exception of the “other international” category. The increase in revenues in the “other international” category largely represents increased revenues in the Middle East region. The decrease in the other regions was largely due to contraction in both the network operator channel and the original equipment manufacturer sales channel, resulting from the global macro-economic crisis and recession. Since wireless network infrastructure spending is dependent on individual network coverage and capacity demands, we do not believe that our revenue fluctuations for any geographic region are necessarily indicative of a trend for our future revenues by geographic area. In addition, growth in one geographic location may not reflect actual demand growth in that location due to the centralized buying processes of our original equipment manufacturer customers.
 
A large portion of our revenues are generated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar.  During the last year, the value of the U.S. Dollar has fluctuated significantly against most other currencies.  We have calculated that when comparing exchange rates in effect for the first nine months of 2008 to those in effect for the first nine months of 2009, the change in the value of foreign currencies as compared with the U.S. Dollar had a negative impact on our revenues for the first nine months of 2009 of approximately one percent. This impact did not have a material impact on our net sales.
 
For the first nine months of 2009, total sales to Nokia Siemens accounted for approximately 35% of sales, and sales to Alcatel-Lucent accounted for approximately 11% of sales.  For the first nine months of 2008, total sales to Nokia Siemens accounted for approximately 30% of sales, and sales to Alcatel-Lucent accounted for approximately 17% of sales for the period.
 
Cost of Sales and Gross Profit
 
The following table presents an analysis of our gross profit:
 

   
Nine Months Ended
(in thousands)
   
September 27, 2009
 
September 28, 2008
Net sales
 
$
424,904
     
100.0 
%
 
$
709,903
     
100.0 
%
Cost of sales:
                               
Cost of sales
   
316,487
     
74.5 
%
   
537,486
     
75.7 
%
Intangible amortization
   
1,870
     
0.4 
%
   
16,459
     
2.3 
%
Restructuring and impairment charges
   
1,738
     
0.4 
%
   
13,903
     
2.0 
%
Total cost of sales
   
320,095
     
75.3 
%
   
567,848
     
80.0 
%
Gross profit
 
$
104,809
     
24.7 
%
 
$
142,055
     
20.0 
%



 
Our total gross profit decreased during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 compared with the first nine months of fiscal 2008, primarily as a result of our decreased revenues.  As a percentage of revenue, our gross profit margin increased during the first nine months of 2009 compared with the first nine months of 2008 due to lower manufacturing costs, lower intangible amortization and lower restructuring costs.  The decrease in the intangible amortization costs is due to the intangible asset impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 (see Note 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part II, Item 8, and Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008).  We incurred approximately $1.7 million of restructuring and impairment charges during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 related to severance charges in the United States, Finland, Sweden and the UK.  For the first nine months of 2008, we incurred $13.9 million of restructuring and impairment charges related to restructuring plans implemented primarily in conjunction with our China and Salisbury manufacturing consolidations. Our cost of goods sold for the first nine months of 2009 was slightly lower as a percentage of revenue compared with the prior year period. This decrease in the percentage of cost of goods sold is due primarily to our cost reduction activities over the last year.
 
Operating Expenses
 
The following table presents a breakdown of our operating expenses by functional category and as a percentage of net sales:
   
Nine Months Ended
(in thousands)
   
September 27, 2009
 
September 28, 2008
Operating Expenses
                               
Sales and marketing
 
$
26,665
     
6.3 
%
 
$
36,064
     
5.1 
%
Research and development
   
44,273
     
10.4 
%
   
58,907
     
8.3 
%
General and administrative
   
36,001
     
8.5 
%
   
49,062
     
6.9 
%
Intangible amortization
   
740
     
0.2 
%
   
7,846
     
1.1 
%
Restructuring and impairment charges
   
1,985
     
0.4 
%
   
3,834
     
0.5 
%
Total operating expenses
 
$
109,664
     
25.8 
%
 
$
155,713
     
21.9 
%

 
Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $9.4 million, or 26%, during the first nine months of 2009 as compared with the first nine months of 2008. The decrease resulted primarily from lower personnel costs resulting from restructuring activities taken in the last year, as well as decreased travel and trade show expenses.
 
Research and development expenses decreased by $14.6 million, or 25%, during the first nine months of 2009 as compared with the first nine months of 2008, primarily from reduced personnel costs due to restructuring actions taken in the last year, lower professional fees for outsourced research and development costs and lower travel expenses.  Also contributing to the decrease were lower materials costs used in research and development activities.
 
General and administrative expenses decreased by $13.1 million, or 27%, during the first nine months of 2009 as compared with the first nine months of 2008. This decrease was due to reduced payroll resulting from personnel reductions over the last year from our restructuring activities and lower audit, tax, legal and professional fees.
 
Amortization of customer-related intangibles from our acquisitions, amounted to $0.7 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared with $7.8 million for the first nine months of 2008. The decrease was due to the intangible asset impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008, which led to lower amortization expense in 2009.
 
Restructuring charges of $2.0 million were recorded in the first nine months of 2009, primarily for severance costs in the United States, Finland and Sweden, compared with charges of $3.8 million for the first nine months of 2008.


 
Other Income (Expense), net
 
The following table presents an analysis of other income (expense), net:
   
Nine Months Ended
(in thousands)
   
September 27, 2009
 
September 28, 2008
Interest income
 
$
531
     
0.1 
%
 
$
430
     
0.1 
%
Interest expense
   
(8,399
)
   
(2.0 
)%
   
(8,372
)
   
(1.2 
)% 
Foreign currency gain (loss), net
   
4,751
     
1.1 
%
   
(3,227
)
   
(0.4 
)% 
Gain on repurchase of convertible debt
   
12,693
     
3.0
%
   
     
 
Other income, net
   
1,374
     
0.3 
%
   
1,070
     
0.1 
%
Other income (expense), net
 
$
10,950
     
2.5 
%
 
$
(10,099
)
   
(1.4 
)% 

 
Interest income and interest expense both increased slightly during the first nine months of 2009 compared with the first nine months of 2008. Interest expense increased slightly due to higher capitalized loan fees and interest expenses related to our new Credit Agreement executed in April 2009. The increase in interest expense was partially offset by lower interest expense associated with the retirement of approximately $69 million of our long-term debt in the last three quarters when compared with the first nine months of 2008.  The increase in other income (expense), net, is primarily due to the $12.7 million gain we recognized on the purchase of $25.4 million in aggregate par value of our outstanding 1.875% subordinated convertible notes due 2024.  We recognized a net foreign currency gain of $4.8 million in the first nine months of 2009 primarily due to fluctuations between the U.S. Dollar and the Euro, Swedish Krona and Chinese RMB, compared to a foreign currency loss of $3.2 million in the first nine months of 2008.
 
Income Tax Provision
 
Our effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2009 was an expense of approximately 25.5% of our pre-tax income of $6.1 million.  Our effective tax rate was reduced by approximately $1.1 million from a reduction in our liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax positions as a result of the expiration of the statutory audit period of the tax jurisdiction.  We have recorded a valuation allowance against a portion of our deferred tax assets pursuant to the accounting guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” due to the uncertainty of the timing and ultimate realization of those assets. As such, for the foreseeable future, the tax provision or tax benefit related to future U.S. earnings or losses will be offset substantially by a reduction in the valuation allowance.  For the first nine months of 2009, we recorded an income tax benefit for losses from tax jurisdictions where the tax benefits will be realized or offset by permanent differences.  The tax benefit recorded was offset by tax expense from operations in foreign jurisdictions, primarily China, and tax expense associated with uncertain tax positions.  We expect our effective tax rate to continue to fluctuate based on the percentage of income earned in each tax jurisdiction.
 
Net Income (Loss)
 
The following table presents a reconciliation of operating loss to net income (loss):

   
Nine Months Ended
(in thousands)
   
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
Operating loss 
 
$
(4,855
)
 
$
(13,658
)
Other income (expense), net
   
10,950
     
(10,099
)
Income (loss) before income taxes
   
6,095
     
(23,757
)
Income tax provision
   
1,555
     
2,515
 
Net income (loss) 
 
$
4,540
   
$
(26,272
)

 
Our net income for the first nine months of 2009 was $4.5 million compared with a loss of $26.3 million for the first nine months of 2008.  The increase in our net income during the first nine months of 2009 as compared with the first nine months of 2008 is the result of lower manufacturing costs and operating expenses resulting from our worldwide cost-cutting and restructuring activities, lower restructuring and impairment costs, lower intangible asset amortization costs resulting from prior year asset impairments and gains on our debt repurchases during the period.


 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
We have historically financed our operations through a combination of cash on hand, cash provided from operations, equipment lease financings, available borrowings under our bank line of credit, private debt placements and both private and public equity offerings. Our principal sources of liquidity consist of existing cash balances, funds expected to be generated from future operations and available borrowings under our Credit Agreement. As of September 27, 2009, we had working capital of $173.3 million, including $44.9 million in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents compared with working capital of $205.2 million at September 28, 2008, which included $57.7 million in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. We currently invest our excess cash in short-term, investment-grade, money-market instruments with maturities of three months or less. We typically hold such investments until maturity and then reinvest the proceeds in similar money market instruments. We believe that all of our cash investments would be readily available to us should the need arise.
 
Cash Flows
 
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the nine months ended September 27, 2009 and September 28, 2008:
 
   
Nine Months Ended
(in thousands)
   
September 27,
2009
 
September 28,
2008
Net cash provided by (used in):
           
Operating activities
 
$
10,836
   
$
17,211
 
Investing activities
   
(643
)
   
(3,069
Financing activities
   
(13,482
)
   
(13,065
)
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash and cash equivalents
   
1,284
     
(1,557
)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
 
$
(2,005
)
 
$
(480
)
 
Net cash provided by operations during the first nine months of 2009 was $10.8 million as compared with $17.2 million during the first nine months of 2008. The reduction in cash flow from operations from the prior year period is due primarily to lower revenues during the first nine months of 2009, which resulted in lower actual gross profit, partially offset by lower operating expenses.
 
Net cash used in investing activities during the first nine months of 2009 was $0.6 million as compared with net cash used in investing activities of $3.1 million during the first nine months of 2008. The net cash used in investing activities during the first nine months of 2009 represents a reduction in our restricted cash of $0.8 million, proceeds from a settlement of litigation of $2.0 million, proceeds from the final installment payment from the sale of the Arkivator business in 2006 of $0.5 million and proceeds from the sale of fixed assets of $0.3 million, offset by capital expenditures of $4.2 million. Total capital expenditures during the first nine months of 2009 and the first nine months of 2008 were approximately $4.2 million and $7.5 million, respectively. The majority of the capital spending during both periods related to computer hardware and test equipment utilized in our manufacturing and research and development areas. We expect our capital spending requirements for the remainder of this year to range between $2 million and $4 million, consisting of test and production equipment, computer hardware and software and expenditures related to our new Thailand facility.
 
Net cash used in financing activities of $13.5 million during the first nine months of 2009 relates primarily to the repurchase of $25.4 million in aggregate par value of our 1.875% convertible subordinated notes due 2024, as well as $1.3 million in debt issuance costs related to our new Credit Agreement.  Net cash used in financing activities of $13.1 million for the first nine months of 2008 relates primarily to the redemption of the 1.25% convertible notes due July 2008.
 
We currently believe that our existing cash balances, funds expected to be generated from operations and borrowings under our Credit Agreement will provide us with sufficient funds to finance our current operations for at least the next twelve months. Our principal sources of liquidity consist of our existing cash balances, funds expected to be generated from operations and our Credit Agreement described below. We regularly review our cash funding requirements and attempt to meet those requirements through a combination of cash on hand and cash provided by operations. Our ability to increase revenues and generate profits is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, and any significant decrease in our revenues or profitability would reduce our operating cash flows and erode our existing cash balances. No assurances can be given that we will be able to generate positive operating cash flows in the future or maintain and/or grow our existing cash balances.


 
We had a total of $280.9 million of long-term convertible subordinated notes outstanding at September 27, 2009, consisting of $130.9 million of 1.875% convertible subordinated notes due 2024 (“2024 Notes”) and $150.0 million of 3.875% convertible subordinated notes due 2027 (“2027 Notes”). Holders of the 2024 Notes may require us to repurchase all or a portion of their notes for cash on November 15, 2011, 2014 and 2019 at 100% of the principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Holders of the 2027 Notes may require us to repurchase all or a portion of their notes for cash on October 1, 2014, 2017 and 2022 at 100% of the principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. No assurance can be given that we will be able to generate positive operating cash flows in the future or maintain and/or grow our existing cash balances. If we do not generate sufficient cash from operations, or improve our ability to generate cash, we may not have sufficient funds available to pay our maturing debt. If we have not retired the debt prior to maturity, and if we do not have adequate cash available at that time, we would be required to refinance the notes and no assurance can be given that we will be able to refinance the notes on terms acceptable to us or at all given current conditions in the credit markets. If our financial performance is poor or if credit markets remain tight, we will likely encounter a more difficult environment in terms of raising additional financing. If we are not able to repay or refinance the notes or if we experience a prolonged period of reduced customer demand for our products, our ability to maintain operations may be impacted.
 
Financing Activities
 
We entered into a Credit Agreement on April 3, 2009, see Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item I, Financial Information.  Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the lenders thereunder have made available to us a senior secured credit facility in the form of a revolving line of credit up to a maximum of $50.0 million. Availability under the Credit Agreement is based on the calculation of our borrowing base as defined in the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement is secured by a first priority security interest on a majority of our assets, including without limitation, all accounts, equipment, inventory, chattel paper, records, intangibles, deposit accounts, cash and cash equivalents and proceeds of the foregoing. The Credit Agreement expires on August 15, 2011. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants for credit facilities of this type, including limitations on us with respect to indebtedness, liens, investments, distributions, mergers and acquisitions and dispositions of assets. The Credit Agreement also includes financial covenants including minimum EBITDA and maximum capital expenditures that are applicable only if the availability of our line of credit falls below $20.0 million.  We are currently in compliance with these covenants as of September 27, 2009.  If the current economic recession continues and our revenues decrease, there is no assurance that we will be able to comply with the covenants in the Credit Agreement.  See “We will need additional capital in the future and such financing may not be available on favorable terms…” under Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors.
 
Also on April 3, 2009, in connection with entering into the Credit Agreement referenced above, we terminated our Amended Receivables Purchase Agreement. As of the date of termination, we did not have any borrowings outstanding under the Amended Receivables Purchase Agreement. In addition, we did not incur any early termination penalties in connection with the termination of the Amended Receivables Purchase Agreement.
 
On occasion, we have previously utilized both operating and capital lease financing for certain equipment purchases used in our manufacturing and research and development operations and may selectively continue to do so in the future. We may require additional funds in the future to support our working capital requirements or for other purposes such as acquisitions, and we may seek to raise such additional funds through the sale of public or private equity and/or debt financings, as well as from other sources. Our ability to secure additional financing or sources of funding is dependent upon our financial performance, credit rating and the market price for our Common Stock, which are all directly impacted by our ability to grow revenues and generate profits. In addition, our ability to obtain financing is directly dependent upon the availability of financial markets to provide sources of financing on reasonable terms and conditions.  During the last half of fiscal 2008 and the first nine months of fiscal 2009, the capital and credit markets have experienced extreme volatility and disruption.  In several cases, the markets have exerted downward pressure on stock prices and credit capacity for certain issuers. Given current market conditions, we can make no guarantee that we will be able to obtain additional financing or secure new financing arrangements in the future. If our operating performance was to deteriorate and our cash balances were to be significantly reduced, we would likely encounter a more difficult environment in terms of raising additional funding to support our business and we may be required to further reduce operating expenses or scale back operations.


 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
Our off-balance sheet arrangements consist primarily of conventional operating leases, purchase commitments and other commitments arising in the normal course of business, as further discussed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2008, in Part II, Item 7 under the heading Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments. As of September 27, 2009, we did not have any other relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partners, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually-narrow or limited purposes.
 
Disclosure About Stock Option Plans
 
Our stock option program is a broad-based, long-term retention program that is intended to attract and retain talented employees and align stockholder and employee interests. The program consists of six separate plans: one under which non-employee directors may be granted options to purchase shares of stock and five broad-based plans under which options may be granted to all employees, including officers. One such plan provides for both option grants and stock based awards including restricted stock awards. Options granted under these plans expire either five or ten years from the grant date and generally vest over one to four years.
 
During the first nine months of 2009, we granted options to purchase a total of 4,698,750 shares of Common Stock. We did not grant any shares of restricted stock to employees during this time period. After deducting 787,566 shares for options forfeited, the result was net options granted of 3,911,184. Net options granted during the first nine months of 2009 represented 3.0% of our total outstanding shares of Common Stock of 132,359,006 as of September 27, 2009. The following table summarizes the net stock option grants and restricted stock awards to our employees, directors and executive officers:
 
   
Nine Months Ended
September 27,
2009
 
Year Ended
December 28,
2008
Net grants (forfeitures) during the period as a % of total outstanding common shares
   
3.0%
     
0.2%
 
Grants to executive officers during the period as a % of total options and awards granted during the period
   
32.9%
     
21.6%
 
Grants to executive officers during the period as a % of total outstanding common shares
   
1.2%
     
0.3%
 
Cumulative options held by executive officers as a % of total options outstanding
   
36.5%
     
34.7%
 
 
As of September 27, 2009, a total of 1,800,328 options were available for grant under all of our option plans with a total of 16,200 shares of Common Stock held in escrow to cover all remaining exercises under our 1995 Stock Option Plan. See Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008 for further information regarding our 1995 Stock Option Plan. The following table summarizes activity for outstanding options under all of our stock option plans during the first nine months of 2009:
 
   
Number of
Shares
 
Price Per Share
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   
Number of
Options
Exercisable
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Balance at December 28, 2008
   
6,840,921
   
$
0.49-$67.08
   
$
8.34
     
3,724,870
   
$
10.62
 
Granted
   
4,698,750
   
$
0.42-$1.46
   
$
0.54
                 
Exercised
   
     
     
                 
Cancelled
   
(787,566
)
 
$
0.48-$61.67
   
$
9.74
                 
Balance at September 27, 2009
   
10,752,105
   
$
0.42-$67.08
   
$
4.83
     
4,138,920
   
$
9.23
 
 



 
The following table summarizes outstanding stock options that are “in-the-money” and “out-of the-money” as of September 27, 2009. For purposes of this table, in-the-money stock options are those options with an exercise price less than $1.58 per share, the closing price of our Common Stock on September 25, 2009, the last trading day of the fiscal quarter. Out-of-the-money stock options are stock options with an exercise price greater than or equal to the $1.58 per share closing price.
 
   
Exercisable
   
Unexercisable
   
Total
Shares
 
   
Shares
   
Wtd. Avg.
Exercise
Price
   
Shares
   
Wtd. Avg.
Exercise
Price
 
In-the-Money
   
22,500
   
$
1.20
     
4,663,750
   
$
0.54
     
4,686,250
 
Out-of-the-Money
   
4,116,420
     
9.27
     
1,949,435
     
5.76
     
6,065,855
 
Total Options Outstanding
   
4,138,920
   
$
9.23
     
6,613,185
   
$
2.08
     
10,752,105
 
 
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the exercise of options by each of our executive officers during the first nine months of 2009, including the aggregate value of gains on the date of exercise held by such executive officers, as well as the number of shares covered by both exercisable and unexercisable stock options as of September 27, 2009. Also reported are the values for the in-the-money options which represent the positive spread between the exercise prices of any such existing stock options and the closing price of our Common Stock on September 25, 2009, the last trading day of the fiscal quarter.
 
Name
 
Shares
Acquired
on
Exercise
 
Value
Realized
 
Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options at
September 27, 2009
 
Value of Unexercised
In-the-Money Options at
September 27, 2009(1)
 
Exercisable
 
Unexercisable
 
Exercisable
 
Unexercisable
 
Ronald J. Buschur
   
   
$
 
1,050,000
 
550,000
 
$
 
$
565,000
 
Kevin T. Michaels
   
   
$
 
552,500
 
337,500
 
$
 
$
282,500
 
J. Marvin Magee
   
   
$
 
147,916
 
512,084
 
$
 
$
452,000
 
Khurram P. Sheikh
   
   
$
 
96,354
 
459,896
 
$
 
$
414,150
 
Basem Anshasi
   
   
$
 
68,331
 
146,669
 
$
 
$
75,500
 
 
 

(1)
In accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules, values are calculated by subtracting the exercise price from the fair market value of the underlying Common Stock. For purposes of this table, fair market value per share is deemed to be $1.58, which was the closing price of our Common Stock as reported by NASDAQ on September 25, 2009, the last trading day of the fiscal quarter.
 
Our shareholders have previously approved all stock option plans under which our Common Stock is reserved for issuance. The following table provides summary information as of September 27, 2009, for all of our stock option plans:
 

   
Number of Shares of
Common Stock to
be Issued upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
   
Number of Shares of
Common Stock
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
under our Stock
Option Plans
(Excluding Shares
Reflected in Column 1)
(1)
 
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders
   
10,752,105
   
$
4.83
     
1,800,328
 
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders
   
     
     
 
Total
   
10,752,105
   
$
4.83
     
1,800,328
 

 
 

(1)
The number of shares of Common Stock remaining available for future issuance has also been reduced to reflect 245,000 shares of restricted stock issued under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.
 


ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term investments, capital leases and long-term debt. As of September 27, 2009, the carrying values of our financial instruments approximated their fair values based upon current market prices and rates.
 
We are exposed to a number of market risks in the ordinary course of business. These risks, which include foreign currency risk, interest rate risk and commodity price risk, arise in the normal course of business rather than from trading. We have examined our exposures to these risks and have concluded, as we similarly concluded in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008, that none of our exposures in these areas are material to fair values, cash flows or earnings.
 
Foreign Currency Risk
 
Our international operations represent a substantial portion of our operating results and asset base. We maintain various operations in multiple foreign locations including Brazil, China, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, India, Singapore, Sweden and the United Kingdom. These international operations generally incur local operating costs and generate third-party revenues in the currencies used in such foreign jurisdictions. Such foreign currency revenues and expenses expose us to foreign currency risk and give rise to foreign exchange gains and losses.
 
We regularly pursue new customers in various international locations where new deployments or upgrades to existing wireless communication networks are planned. As a result, a significant portion of our revenues are derived from international sources (excluding North America), with our international customers accounting for approximately 72% of our net sales during the first nine months of 2009, 70% of our net sales during fiscal 2008 and 73% of our fiscal 2007 sales. Such international sources include Europe, Asia and South America, where there has been historical volatility in several of the regions’ currencies. Changes in the value of the U.S. Dollar versus the local currency in which our products are sold exposes us to foreign currency risk, since the weakening of an international customer’s local currency and banking market may negatively impact such customer’s ability to meet their payment obligations to us. Alternatively, if a sale price is denominated in U.S. Dollars and the value of the Dollar falls, we may suffer a loss due to the lower value of the Dollar. In addition, certain of our international customers require that we transact business with them in their own local currency regardless of the location of our operations, which also exposes us to foreign currency risk. As we sell products or services in foreign currencies, we may be required to convert the payments received into U.S. Dollars or utilize such foreign currencies as payments for expenses of our business, which may give rise to foreign exchange gains and losses. Given the uncertainty as to when and what specific foreign currencies may be required or agreed upon to accept as payment from our international customers, we cannot predict the ultimate impact that such a decision would have on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For the first nine months of 2009, we recorded a foreign exchange translation gain of $4.8 million due to fluctuations in the value of the U.S. Dollar. There can be no assurance that we will not incur foreign exchange translation losses in the future if the Dollar further weakens.
 
Interest Rate Risk
 
As of September 27, 2009, we had cash equivalents of approximately $47.5 million in both interest and non-interest bearing accounts, including restricted cash. We also had $130.9 million of our convertible subordinated notes due November 2024 at a fixed annual interest rate of 1.875% and $150.0 million of convertible subordinated notes due October 2027 at a fixed rate of 3.875%. We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily through our convertible subordinated debt and our cash investment portfolio. Short-term investment rates decreased significantly during 2008 and 2009 as the U.S. Federal Reserve attempted to soften the impacts of the economic slowdown and subprime mortgage crisis. In spite of this, we believe that we are not subject to material fluctuations in principal given the short-term maturities and high-grade investment quality of our investment portfolio, and the fact that the effective interest rate of our portfolio tracks closely to various short-term money market interest rate benchmarks. Therefore, we currently do not use derivative instruments to manage our interest rate risk. Based on our overall interest rate exposure at September 27, 2009, we do not believe that a 100 basis point change in interest rates would have a material effect on our consolidated business, results of operations or financial condition.


 
Commodity Price Risk
 
Our internal manufacturing operations and contract manufacturers require significant quantities of transistors, semiconductors and various metals for use in the manufacture of our products. Therefore, we are exposed to certain commodity price risk associated with variations in the market prices for these electronic components as these prices directly impact the cost to manufacture products and the price we pay our contract manufacturers to manufacture our products. We attempt to manage this risk by entering into supply agreements with our contract manufacturers and various suppliers of these components in order to mitigate the impact on us of any fluctuations in commodity prices. These supply agreements are not long-term supply agreements. If we or our contract manufacturers become subject to a significant increase in the price of one of these components, we would likely be forced to pay such higher prices and we may be unable to pass such costs onto our customers. In addition, certain transistors and semiconductors are regularly revised or changed by their manufacturers, which may result in a requirement for us to redesign a product that utilizes such components or cease to produce such products. In such events, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected. Additionally, we require specialized electronic test equipment, which is utilized in both the design and manufacture of our products. Such electronic test equipment is available from limited sources and may not be available in the time periods required for us to meet our customers’ demand. If required, we may be forced to pay higher prices for such equipment and/or we may not be able to obtain the equipment in the time periods required, which would then delay our development or production of new products. Such delays and any potential additional costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Further, the world economy experienced significant increases in the price of oil and energy during the first three quarters of 2008. Such increases have translated into higher freight and transportation costs and, in certain cases, higher raw material supply costs. These higher costs negatively impacted our production costs. We may not be able to pass on these higher costs to our customers and if we insist on raising prices, our customers may curtail their purchases from us. Further increases in energy prices may negatively impact our results of operations.
 
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Controls and Procedures
 
We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries is made known to the officers who certify our financial reports, as well as other members of senior management and the Board of Directors, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information related to us that is required to be included in our annual and periodic SEC filings. 
 
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Powerwave have been detected.
 
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the first nine months of fiscal 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 


PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.
 
In the first quarter of 2007, four purported shareholder class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against us, our President and Chief Executive Officer, our former Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors and our Chief Financial Officer. The complaints were Jerry Crafton v. Powerwave Technologies, Inc., et. al., Kenneth Kwan v. Powerwave Technologies, Inc., et. al., Achille Tedesco v. Powerwave Technologies, Inc., et. al. and Farokh Etemadieh v. Powerwave Technologies, Inc. et. al. and were brought under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. In June 2007, the four cases were consolidated into one action before the Honorable Judge Philip Gutierrez, and a lead plaintiff was appointed. In October 2007, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint asserting the same causes of action and purporting to state claims on behalf of all persons who purchased Powerwave securities between May 2, 2005 and November 2, 2006. The essence of the allegations in the amended complaint was that the defendants made misleading statements or omissions concerning our projected and actual sales revenues, the integration of certain acquisitions and the sufficiency of our internal controls. In December 2007, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On April 17, 2008, the Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims in connection with our projected sales revenues, but denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ other claims. On August 29, 2008, the defendants answered the amended complaint.  On May 14, 2009, the parties executed a stipulation of settlement to resolve the consolidated action. According to the terms of the proposed settlement, the settlement payment will be funded by our directors and officers liability insurance.  The Court granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement and provisionally certified a settlement class on June 22, 2009, and on October 19, 2009 entered a judgment that granted final approval of the settlement.
 
In March 2007, one additional lawsuit that relates to the pending shareholder class action was filed. The lawsuit, Cucci v. Edwards, et al., filed in the Superior Court of California, is a shareholder derivative action, purported to be brought by an individual shareholder on behalf of Powerwave, against current and former directors of Powerwave. Powerwave is also named as a nominal defendant. The allegations of the derivative complaint closely resemble those in the class action and pertain to the time period of May 2, 2005 through October 9, 2006. Based on those allegations, the derivative complaint asserts various claims for breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, mismanagement, and insider trading under state law. The derivative complaint was removed to federal court, and is also pending before Judge Gutierrez.  On May 15, 2009, the parties executed a stipulation of settlement to resolve the derivative action.  According to the terms of the proposed settlement, we will adopt certain enhancements to its corporate governance policies and procedures and counsel for the derivative plaintiff will be reimbursed its legal fees and expenses, which will be funded by our directors and officers liability insurance. The Court granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement on June 22, 2009, and on October 19, 2009 entered a judgment that granted final approval of the settlement.
 
We are subject to other legal proceedings and claims in the normal course of business.  We are currently defending these proceedings and claims, and, although the outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain presently, we anticipate that we will be able to resolve these matters in a manner that will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
 
Our business faces significant risks. The risks described below may not be the only risks we face. Additional risks that we do not yet know of or that we currently think are immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following risks actually occur, our business, results of operations or financial condition could suffer, and the trading price of our Common Stock could decline, and you may lose all or a part of your investment.
 
Risks Related to the Business
 
We rely upon a few customers for the majority of our revenues and the loss of any one or more of these customers, or a significant loss, reduction or rescheduling of orders from any of these customers, would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
We sell most of our products to a small number of customers, and while we are continually seeking to expand our customer base, we expect this will continue. For the first nine months of 2009, sales to Nokia Siemens accounted for approximately 35% of our net sales and sales to Alcatel-Lucent accounted for approximately 11% of our net sales.  Nokia Siemens accounted for approximately 31% of our revenues in 2008, and Alcatel-Lucent accounted for approximately 17% of our revenues in fiscal 2008.  Nokia Siemens and Alcatel-Lucent are our two largest customers and any decline in business with either of these customers will have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For the first nine months of 2009, our total sales have declined by 40% compared with the same period in 2008.  During this same period, our sales to Nokia Siemens have declined approximately 29% and our sales to Alcatel-Lucent have declined approximately 62%, which has had a negative impact on our business and results of operations. Our future success is dependent upon the continued purchases of our products by a small number of customers such as Nokia Siemens, Alcatel-Lucent, other original equipment manufacturers and network operator customers. Any fluctuations in demand from such customers or other customers would negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. If we are unable to broaden our customer base and expand relationships with major wireless original equipment manufacturers and major operators of wireless networks, our business will continue to be impacted by unanticipated demand fluctuations due to our dependence on a small number of customers. Unanticipated demand fluctuations can have a negative impact on our revenues and business, and an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, our dependence on a small number of major customers exposes us to numerous other risks, including:
 
 
a slowdown or delay in deployment of wireless networks by any one or more customers could significantly reduce demand for our products;
 
 
reductions in a single customer’s forecasts and demand could result in excess inventories;
 
 
the current economic crisis could negatively affect one or more of our major customers and cause them to significantly reduce operations, or file for bankruptcy;
 
 
consolidation of customers can reduce demand as well as increase pricing pressure on our products due to increased purchasing leverage;
 
 
each of our customers has significant purchasing leverage over us to require changes in sales terms including pricing, payment terms and product delivery schedules;
 
 
direct competition should a customer decide to increase its level of internal designing and/or manufacturing of wireless communication network products; and
 
 
concentration of accounts receivable credit risk, which could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition if one of our major customers declared bankruptcy or delayed payment of their receivables.


 
Our operating results have been adversely impacted by the worldwide economic crisis and credit tightening.
 
Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008, worldwide economic conditions significantly deteriorated due to the credit crisis and other factors, including slower economic activity, recessionary concerns, increased energy costs, decreased consumer confidence, reduced corporate profits, reduced or canceled capital spending, adverse business conditions and liquidity concerns. Our revenues declined approximately 42% in the third quarter of 2009 when compared to the third quarter of 2008. All of these factors combined are having a negative impact on the availability of financial capital which is contributing to a reduction in demand for infrastructure in the wireless communication market. These conditions make it difficult or impossible for our customers and vendors to accurately forecast and plan future business activities, causing domestic and foreign businesses to slow or suspend spending on our products and services. As customers face this challenging economic time, they are finding it difficult to gain sufficient credit in a timely manner, which has resulted in an impairment of their ability to place orders with us or to make timely payments to us for previous purchases. If this continues to occur, our revenues will be further reduced, thereby having a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we may be forced to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts and our days of sales outstanding may increase significantly, which would have a negative impact on our cash position, liquidity and financial condition. We cannot predict the magnitude, timing or duration of this economic recession or its impact on the wireless industry.
 
We have previously experienced significant reductions in demand for our products by certain customers and if this continues, our operating results will be adversely impacted.
 
We have a history of significant unanticipated reductions in demand that demonstrate the risks related to our customer and industry concentration levels. While our revenues have increased at times during fiscal years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, a significant portion of this increase was due to our various acquisitions. During fiscal years 2006 and 2007, we experienced significantly reduced demand for our products due to lower than anticipated purchasing plans by a major North American wireless network operator. In addition, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2006, when we acquired the wireless infrastructure division of Filtronic plc, Nokia and Siemens significantly reduced their demand which had a significant negative impact on both Powerwave and the Filtronic plc wireless businesses. As a result of this reduction and the general slowdown in the wireless infrastructure marketplace during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, our revenues decreased to $169.8 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 from $249.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2005. This slowdown continued in the first six months of 2007, when our revenues declined from the fourth quarter of 2006. Our revenues also declined when compared with the first six months of 2006, even though the first six months of 2007 included the Filtronic plc wireless acquisition. These types of reductions in overall market demand have had a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008, the global economic crisis and related recession began to have an impact on our customers and their demand for our products.  As a result of this crisis and recession, our revenues have decreased to $139.0 million in the third quarter of 2009 from $149.7 million in the first quarter of 2009, $180.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 and $238.0 million in the third quarter of 2008. We currently anticipate that our customers may continue to reduce their demand for wireless infrastructure products in the near term, thereby negatively impacting all companies within our industry. This possible reduction in demand would have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
During fiscal 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, we also experienced a significant reduction in demand from Nortel. In the first quarter of 2009, Nortel filed for bankruptcy protection and in the third quarter of 2009, they received government approval of the sale of their assets.  Given the current economic climate, it is possible that one or more of our other customers will suffer significant financial difficulties, including potentially filing for bankruptcy protection. In such an event, the demand for our products from these customers may decline significantly or cease completely. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to continue to generate new demand to offset any such reductions from existing customers. If we are unable to continue to generate new demand, our revenues will go down and our results of operations and financial condition will be negatively impacted.
 
Also, in the past we have experienced significant unanticipated reductions in wireless network operator demand as well as significant delays in demand for 3G and 4G, or next generation service based products, due to the high projected capital cost of building such networks and market concerns regarding the inoperability of such network protocols. In combination with these market issues, a majority of wireless network operators have in the past regularly reduced their capital spending plans in order to improve their overall cash flow. There is a substantial likelihood that the global economic recession will continue throughout 2009 and 2010, thereby having a negative impact on network operator deployment spending plans. The impact of any future reduction in capital spending by wireless network operators, coupled with any delays in deployment of wireless networks, will result in reduced demand for our products, which will have a material adverse effect on our business.


 
We will need additional capital in the future and such additional financing may not be available on favorable terms or at all.
 
As of September 27, 2009, we had approximately $47.5 million of cash, with $2.6 million of it restricted. We cannot provide any guarantee that we will generate sufficient cash in the future to maintain or grow our operations over the long-term. We rely upon our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations to fund our business. If we are not able to generate positive cash flow from operations, we may need to utilize sources of financing such as our Credit Agreement or other sources of cash. While our Credit Agreement provides us with additional sources of liquidity, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financings in order to fund existing operations or to take advantage of opportunities, including more rapid international expansion or acquisitions of complementary businesses or technologies.  In addition, if our business further deteriorates, we might be unable to maintain compliance with the covenants in our Credit Agreement which could result in reduced availability under the Credit Agreement, an event of default under the Credit Agreement, or could make the Credit Agreement unavailable to us.  If we are not successful in growing our businesses, reducing our inventories and accounts receivable and managing the worldwide aspects of our Company, our operations may not generate positive cash flow, and we may consume our cash resources faster than we anticipate. Such losses would make it difficult to obtain new sources of financing. In addition, if we do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, we may need to raise additional funds to repay our $280.9 million of remaining outstanding convertible subordinated debt that we issued in 2004 and 2007. The holders of this convertible subordinated debt may require us to repurchase the debt issued in 2004 as early as November 15, 2011 and the debt issued in 2007 as early as October 1, 2014. Our ability to secure additional financing or sources of funding is dependent upon numerous factors, including the current outlook of our business, our credit rating and the market price of our Common Stock, all of which are directly impacted by our ability to increase revenues and generate profits. In addition, the availability of new financing is dependent upon functioning debt and equity markets with financing available on reasonable terms. Given the recent credit crisis, there can be no guarantee that such a market would be available to us. If such a market is not available, we may be unable to raise new financing, which would negatively impact our business and possibly impact our ability to maintain operations as presently conducted.
 
Our ability to increase revenues and generate profits is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties including the likelihood of decreased revenues in the current macro-economic environment. Any significant decrease in our revenues or profitability could reduce our operating cash flows and erode our existing cash balances. Our ability to reduce our inventories and accounts receivable and improve our cash flow is dependent on numerous risks and uncertainties, and if we are not able to reduce our inventories, we will not generate the cash required to operate our business. Our ability to secure additional financing is also dependent upon not only our business profitability, but also the credit markets, which have recently become highly constrained due to credit concerns arising from the subprime mortgage lending market and subsequent worldwide economic recession. If we are unable to secure additional financing or such financing is not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to fund our operations, otherwise respond to unanticipated competitive pressures, or repay our convertible debt.
 
We may be adversely affected by the bankruptcy of our customers.
 
We may not successfully evaluate the creditworthiness of our customers. While we maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments, greater than anticipated nonpayment and delinquency rates could harm our financial results and liquidity. Given the current global economic recession, there are potentials risks of greater than anticipated customer defaults. In the first quarter of 2009, our customer Nortel filed for U.S. bankruptcy protection. If the financial condition of any of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances would be required and would negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
We may incur unanticipated costs as we complete the restructuring of our business.
 
We have previously encountered difficulties and delays in integrating and consolidating operations which have had a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The failure to successfully integrate these operations could undermine the anticipated benefits and synergies of the restructuring, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The anticipated benefits and synergies of our restructurings relate to cost savings associated with operational efficiencies and greater economies of scale. However, these anticipated benefits and synergies are based on projections and assumptions, not actual experience, and assume a smooth and successful integration of our business.


 
We may need to undertake restructuring actions in the future.
 
We have previously recognized restructuring charges in response to slowdowns in demand for our products and in conjunction with cost cutting measures and measures to improve the efficiency of our operations. As a result of economic conditions, we may need to initiate restructuring actions that could result in restructuring charges which could have a material impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Such potential restructuring actions could include cash costs that could reduce our available cash balances, which would have a negative impact on our business.
 
The potential for increased commodity and energy costs may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
The world economy has experienced significant fluctuations in the price of oil and energy during 2008 and the first nine months of 2009. Such fluctuations resulted in significant price increases which translated into higher freight and transportation costs and, in certain cases, higher raw material supply costs. These higher costs negatively impacted our production costs. We were not able to pass on these higher costs to our customers, and if we insist on raising prices, our customers may curtail their purchases from us. The costs of energy and items directly related to the cost of energy will fluctuate due to factors that may not be predictable, such as the economy, political conditions and the weather. Further increases in energy prices may negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
We have experienced, and will continue to experience, significant fluctuations in sales and operating results from quarter to quarter.
 
Our quarterly results fluctuate due to a number of factors, including:
 
 
the lack of any obligation by our customers to purchase their forecasted demand for our products;
 
 
costs associated with restructuring activities, including severance, inventory obsolescence and facility closure costs;
 
 
variations in the timing, cancellation, or rescheduling of customer orders and shipments;
 
 
costs associated with consolidating acquisitions;
 
 
high fixed expenses that increase operating expenses, especially during a quarter with a sales shortfall;
 
 
product failures and associated warranty and in-field service support costs; and
 
 
discounts given to certain customers for large volume purchases.
 
We have regularly generated a large percentage of our revenues in the last month of a quarter. Since we attempt to ship products quickly after we receive orders, we may not always have a significant backlog of unfilled orders at the start of each quarter and we may be required to book a substantial portion of our orders during the quarter in which such orders ship. Our major customers generally have no obligation to purchase forecasted amounts and may cancel orders, change delivery schedules or change the mix of products ordered with minimal notice and without penalty. As a result, we may not be able to accurately predict our quarterly sales. Because our expense levels are partially based on our expectations of future sales, our expenses may be disproportionately large relative to our revenues, and we may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall. Any shortfall in sales relative to our quarterly expectations or any delay of customer orders would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
Order deferrals and cancellations by our customers, declining average sales prices, changes in the mix of products sold, delays in the introduction of new products and longer than anticipated sales cycles for our products have, in the past, adversely affected our business, results of operations and financial condition. Despite these factors, we, along with our contract manufacturers, maintain significant finished goods, work-in-progress and raw materials inventory to meet estimated order forecasts. If our customers purchase less than their forecasted orders or cancel or delay existing purchase orders, there will be higher levels of inventory that face a greater risk of obsolescence. If our customers desire to purchase products in excess of the forecasted amounts or in a different product mix, there may not be enough inventory or manufacturing capacity to fill their orders.
 
Due to these and other factors, our past results are not reliable indicators of our future performance. Future revenues and operating results may not meet the expectations of public market analysts or investors. In either case, the price of our Common Stock could be materially adversely affected.


 
Our average sales prices have declined, and we anticipate that the average sales prices for our products will continue to decline and negatively impact our gross profit margins.
 
Wireless service providers are continuing to place pricing pressure on wireless infrastructure manufacturers, which in turn, has resulted in lower selling prices for our products, with certain competitors aggressively reducing prices in an effort to increase their market share. The consolidation of original equipment manufacturers such as Alcatel-Lucent and Nokia Siemens is concentrating their purchasing power at the surviving entities, which is placing further pricing pressures on the products we sell to such customers. Moreover, the current economic downturn may cause wireless service providers to be even more aggressive in demanding price reductions as they attempt to reduce costs. As a result, we may be forced to further reduce our prices to such customers, which would have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. If we do not agree to lower our prices as some customers request, those customers may stop purchasing our products, which would significantly impact our business. We believe that the average sales prices of our products will continue to decline for the foreseeable future. The weighted average sales price for our products declined approximately 6% to 9% from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 and we expect that this will continue going forward. Since wireless infrastructure manufacturers frequently negotiate supply arrangements far in advance of delivery dates, we must often commit to price reductions for our products before we know how, or if, we can obtain such cost reductions. With ongoing consolidation in our industry, the increased size of many of our customers allows them to exert greater pressure on us to reduce prices. In addition, average sales prices are affected by price discounts negotiated without firm orders for large volume purchases by certain customers. To offset declining average sales prices, we must reduce manufacturing costs and ultimately develop new products with lower costs or higher average sales prices. If we cannot achieve such cost reductions or increases in average selling prices, our gross margins will decline.
 
Our suppliers, contract manufacturers or customers could become competitors.
 
Many of our customers, especially our original equipment manufacturer customers, internally design and/or manufacture their own wireless communications network products. These customers also continuously evaluate whether to manufacture their own wireless communications network products or utilize contract manufacturers to produce their own internal designs. Certain of our customers regularly produce or design wireless communications network products in an attempt to replace products manufactured by us. In addition, some customers threaten to undertake such activities if we do not agree to their requested price reductions. We believe that all of these practices will continue. In the event that our customers manufacture or design their own wireless communications network products, such customers could reduce or eliminate their purchases of our products, which would result in reduced revenues and would adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. Wireless infrastructure equipment manufacturers with internal manufacturing capabilities, including many of our customers, could also sell wireless communications network products externally to other manufacturers, thereby competing directly with us. In addition, our suppliers or contract manufacturers may decide to produce competing products directly for our customers and, effectively, compete against us. If, for any reason, our customers produce their wireless communications network products internally, increase the percentage of their internal production, require us to participate in joint venture manufacturing with them, require us to reduce our prices, engage our suppliers or contract manufacturers to manufacture competing products, or otherwise compete directly against us, our revenues would decrease, which would adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
Our success is tied to the growth of the wireless services communications market and our future revenue growth is dependent upon the expected increase in the size of this market.
 
Our revenues come from the sale of wireless communications network products and coverage solutions. Our future success depends solely upon the growth and increased availability of wireless communications services. Wireless communications services may not grow at a rate fast enough to create demand for our products, as we experienced during fiscal 2003, fiscal 2006, fiscal 2007, the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 and the first nine months of fiscal 2009. Some of our network operator customers rely on credit to finance the build-out or expansion of their wireless networks. The current credit environment and the worldwide economic recession will likely result in a reduction of demand from some of our customers in the near term. During fiscal 2006 and into fiscal 2007, a major North American wireless network operator significantly reduced demand for new products. In addition, during the same period, several major equipment manufacturers began a process of consolidating their operations, which significantly reduced their demand for our products. During fiscal 2003, wireless network operators reduced or delayed capital spending on wireless networks in order to preserve their operating cash and improve their balance sheets. Such reduced spending on wireless networks had a negative impact on our operating results. If wireless network operators delay or reduce levels of capital spending, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be negatively impacted.


 
Our reliance on contract manufacturers exposes us to risks of excess inventory or inventory carrying costs.
 
If our contract manufacturers are unable to respond in a timely fashion to changes in customer demand, we may be unable to produce enough products to respond to sudden increases in demand, resulting in lost revenues. Alternatively, in the case of order cancellations or decreases in demand, we may be liable for excess or obsolete inventory or cancellation charges resulting from contractual purchase commitments that we have with our contract manufacturers. We regularly provide rolling forecasts of our requirements to our contract manufacturers for planning purposes, pursuant to our agreements, a portion of which is binding upon us. Additionally, we are committed to accept delivery on the forecasted terms for a portion of the rolling forecast. Cancellations of orders or changes to the forecasts provided to any of our contract manufacturers may result in cancellation costs payable by us. In the past, we have been required to take delivery of materials from our suppliers and subcontractors that were in excess of our requirements, and we have previously recognized charges and expenses related to such excess material. We expect that we will incur such costs in the future.
 
By using contract manufacturers, our ability to directly control the use of all inventories is reduced since we do not have full operating control over their operations. If we are unable to accurately forecast demand for our contract manufacturers and manage the costs associated with our contract manufacturers, we may be required to pay inventory carrying costs or purchase excess inventory. If we or our contract manufacturers are unable to utilize such excess inventory in a timely manner, and are unable to sell excess components or products due to their customized nature, our operating results and liquidity would be negatively impacted.
 
Future additions to, or consolidations of manufacturing operations may present risks, and we may be unable to achieve the financial and strategic goals associated with such actions.
 
We have previously added new manufacturing locations, as well as consolidated existing manufacturing locations in an attempt to achieve operating cost savings and improved operating results.  We continually evaluate these types of opportunities.  We may acquire or invest in new locations, or we may consolidate existing locations into either existing or new locations in order to reduce our manufacturing costs.  We are currently in the process of establishing a new manufacturing location in the country of Thailand.  Such activities subject us to numerous risks and uncertainties, including the following:

 
 
difficulty integrating the new locations into our existing operations;
 
 
difficulty consolidating existing locations into one location;
 
 
inability to achieve the anticipated financial and strategic benefits of the specific new location or consolidation;
 
 
significant unanticipated additional costs incurred to start up a new manufacturing location;
 
 
inability to attract key technical and managerial personnel to a new location;
 
 
inability to retain key technical and managerial personnel due to the consolidation of locations to a new location;
 
 
diversion of our management’s attention from other business issues;
 
 
failure of our review and approval process to identify significant issues, including issues related to manpower, raw material supplies, legal and financial contingencies.
 
If we are unable to manage these risks effectively as part of any investment in a new manufacturing location or consolidation of locations, our business would be adversely affected.


 
Future acquisitions, or strategic alliances, may present risks, and we may be unable to achieve the financial and strategic goals intended at the time of any acquisition or strategic alliance.
 
In the past, we have acquired and made investments in other companies, products and technologies and entered into strategic alliances with other companies. We continually evaluate these types of opportunities. We may acquire or invest in other companies, products or technologies, or we may enter into joint ventures, mergers or strategic alliances with other companies. Such transactions subject us to numerous risks, including the following:
 
 
difficulty integrating the operations, technology and personnel of the acquired company;
 
 
inability to achieve the anticipated financial and strategic benefits of the specific acquisition or strategic alliance;
 
 
significant additional warranty costs due to product failures and or design differences that were not identified during due diligence, which could result in charges to earnings if they are not recoverable from the seller;
 
 
inability to retain key technical and managerial personnel from the acquired company;
 
 
difficulty in maintaining controls, procedures and policies during the transition and integration process;
 
 
diversion of our management’s attention from other business concerns;
 
 
failure of our due diligence process to identify significant issues, including issues with respect to product quality, product architecture, legal and financial contingencies, and product development; and
 
 
significant exit charges if products acquired in business combinations are unsuccessful.
 
If we are unable to manage these risks effectively as part of any acquisition or joint venture, our business would be adversely affected.
 
We depend on single sources or limited sources for key components and products, which exposes us to risks related to product shortages or delays, as well as potential product quality issues, all of which could increase the cost of our products thereby reducing our operating profits.
 
A number of our products and the parts used in our products are available from only one or a limited number of outside suppliers due to unique component designs, as well as certain quality and performance requirements. To take advantage of volume pricing discounts, we also purchase certain products, and along with our contract manufacturers, purchase certain customized components from single or limited sources. We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, shortages of single-source and limited-source components. Shortages have compelled us to adjust our product designs and production schedules and have caused us to miss customer requested delivery dates. To date, missed customer delivery dates have not had a material adverse impact on our financial results. If single-source or limited-source components become unavailable in sufficient quantities in the desired time periods, are discontinued or are available only on unsatisfactory terms, we would be required to purchase comparable components from other sources and may be required to redesign our products to use such components which could delay production and delivery of our products. If production and delivery of our products are delayed such that we do not meet the agreed upon delivery dates of our customers, such delays could result in lost revenues due to customer cancellations, as well as potential financial penalties payable to our customers. Any such loss of revenue or financial penalties could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
Our reliance on certain single-source and limited-source components and products also exposes us and our contract manufacturers to quality control risks if these suppliers experience a failure in their production process or otherwise fail to meet our quality requirements. A failure in a single-source or limited-source component or product could force us to repair or replace a product utilizing replacement components. If we cannot obtain comparable replacements or redesign our products, we could lose customer orders or incur additional costs, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
We may fail to develop products that are sufficiently manufacturable, which could negatively impact our ability to sell our products.
 
Manufacturing our products is a complex process that requires significant time and expertise to meet customers’ specifications. Successful manufacturing is substantially dependent upon the ability to assemble and tune these products to meet specifications in an efficient manner. In this regard, we largely depend on our staff of assembly workers and trained technicians at our internal manufacturing operations in the United States, Europe and Asia, as well as our contract manufacturers’ staff of assembly workers and trained technicians located in Asia and Europe. If we cannot design our products to minimize the manual assembly and tuning process, or if we or our contract manufacturers lose a number of trained assembly workers and technicians or are unable to attract additional trained assembly workers or technicians, we may be unable to have our products manufactured in a cost effective manner.


 
We may fail to develop products that are of adequate quality and reliability, which could negatively impact our ability to sell our products.
 
We have had quality problems with our products including those we have acquired in recent business acquisitions. We may have similar product quality problems in the future. We have replaced components in some products and replaced entire products in accordance with our product warranties. We believe that our customers will demand that our products meet increasingly stringent performance and reliability standards. If we cannot keep pace with technological developments, evolving industry standards and new communications protocols, if we fail to adequately improve product quality and meet the quality standards of our customers, or if our contract manufacturers fail to achieve the quality standards of our customers, we risk losing business which would negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. Design problems could also damage relationships with existing and prospective customers and could limit our ability to market our products to large wireless infrastructure manufacturers, many of which build their own products and have stringent quality control standards. In addition, we have incurred significant costs addressing quality issues from products that we have acquired in certain of our acquisitions. We are also required to honor certain warranty claims for products that we have acquired in our recent acquisitions. While we intend to seek recovery of amounts that we have paid, or may pay in the future to resolve warranty claims through indemnification from the prior manufacturer, this can be a costly and time consuming process.
 
 If we are unable to hire and retain highly qualified technical and managerial personnel, we may not be able to sustain or grow our business.
 
Competition for personnel, particularly qualified engineers, is intense. The loss of a significant number of such persons, as well as the failure to recruit and train additional technical personnel in a timely manner, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The departure of any of our management and technical personnel, the breach of their confidentiality and non-disclosure obligations to us or the failure to achieve our intellectual property objectives may also have a material adverse effect on our business.
 
We believe that our success depends upon the knowledge and experience of our management and technical personnel and our ability to market our existing products and to develop new products. Our employees are generally employed on an at- will basis and do not have non-compete agreements. Therefore, we have had, and may continue to have, employees leave us and go to work for competitors.
 
There are significant risks related to our internal and contract manufacturing operations in Asia and Europe.
 
As part of our manufacturing strategy, we utilize contract manufacturers in China, Europe, Singapore and Thailand. We also maintain our own manufacturing operations in China and Estonia, as well as the United States and are in the process of establishing a new manufacturing facility in Thailand.
 
The Chinese legal system lacks transparency, which gives the Chinese central and local government authorities a higher degree of control over our business in China than is customary in the United States and makes the process of obtaining necessary regulatory approval in China inherently unpredictable. In addition, the protection accorded our proprietary technology and know-how under the Chinese and Thai legal systems is not as strong as in the United States and, as a result, we may lose valuable trade secrets and competitive advantage. Also, manufacturing our products and utilizing contract manufacturers, as well as other suppliers throughout the Asia region, exposes our business to the risk that our proprietary technology and ownership rights may not be protected or enforced to the extent that they may be in the United States.
 
Although the Chinese government has been pursuing economic reform and a policy of welcoming foreign investments during the past two decades, it is possible that the Chinese government will change its current policies in the future, making continued business operations in China difficult or unprofitable.
 
In September 2006, Thailand experienced a military coup which overturned the existing government. In late 2008, anti-government protests and civilian occupations culminated with a court-ordered ouster of Thailand’s prime minister. In 2009, continued unrest has impacted the government of Thailand, and potential civil unrest may continue. To date, this has not had a long-term impact on our operations in Thailand. If there are future coups or some other type of political unrest, such activity may impact the ability to manufacture products in this region and may prevent shipments from entering or leaving the country. Any such disruptions could have a material negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.


 
We require air or ocean transport to ship products built in our various manufacturing locations to our customers. High energy costs have increased our transportation costs which has had a negative impact on our production costs. Transportation costs would also escalate if there were a shortage of air or ocean cargo space and any significant increase in transportation costs would cause an increase in our expenses and negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if we are unable to obtain cargo space or secure delivery of components or products due to labor strikes, lockouts, work slowdowns or work stoppages by longshoremen, dock workers, airline pilots or other transportation industry workers, our delivery of products could be adversely delayed.
 
The initial sales cycle associated with our products is typically lengthy, often lasting from nine to eighteen months, which could cause delays in forecasted sales and cause us to incur substantial expenses before we record any associated revenues.
 
Our customers normally conduct significant technical evaluations, trials and qualifications of our products before making purchase commitments. This qualification process involves a significant investment of time and resources from both our customers and us in order to ensure that our product designs are fully qualified to perform as required. The qualification and evaluation process, as well as customer field trials, may take longer than initially forecasted, thereby delaying the shipment of sales forecasted for a specific customer for a particular quarter and causing our operating results for the quarter to be less than originally forecasted. Such a sales shortfall would reduce our profitability and negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
We conduct a significant portion of our business internationally, which exposes us to increased business risks.
 
For the first nine months of 2009, and for fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006, international revenues (excluding North American sales) accounted for approximately 72%, 70%, 73% and 72% of our net sales, respectively. There are many risks that currently impact, and will continue to impact, our international business and multinational operations, including the following:
 
 
compliance with multiple and potentially conflicting regulations in Europe, Asia and North and South America, including export requirements, tariffs, import duties and other trade barriers, as well as health and safety requirements;
 
 
potential labor strikes, lockouts, work slowdowns and work stoppages at U.S. and international ports;
 
 
differences in intellectual property protections throughout the world;
 
 
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations in Europe, Asia and South America, including dealings with unionized labor pools in Europe and in Asia;
 
 
longer accounts receivable collection cycles in Europe, Asia and South America;
 
 
currency fluctuations and resulting losses on currency translations;
 
 
terrorist attacks on American companies;
 
 
economic instability, including inflation and interest rate fluctuations, such as those previously seen in South Korea and Brazil;
 
 
competition for foreign based suppliers throughout the world;
 
 
overlapping or differing tax structures;
 
 
the complexity of global tax and transfer pricing rules and regulations and our potential inability to benefit/offset losses in one tax jurisdiction with income from another;
 
 
cultural and language differences between the United States and the rest of the world; and
 
 
political or civil turmoil.
 
Any failure on our part to manage these risks effectively would seriously reduce our competitiveness in the wireless infrastructure marketplace.
 
Protection of our intellectual property is limited.
 
We rely upon trade secrets and patents to protect our intellectual property. We execute confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with certain employees and our suppliers, as well as limit access to and distribution of our proprietary information. We have an ongoing program to identify and file applications for U.S. and other international patents.


 
The departure of any of our management and technical personnel, the breach of their confidentiality and non-disclosure obligations to us, or the failure to achieve our intellectual property objectives could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We do not have non-compete agreements with our employees who are generally employed on an at-will basis. Therefore, we have had, and may continue to have, employees leave us and go to work for competitors. If we are not successful in prohibiting the unauthorized use of our proprietary technology or the use of our processes by a competitor, our competitive advantage may be significantly reduced which would result in reduced revenues.
 
We are at risk of third-party claims of infringement that could harm our competitive position.
 
We have received third-party claims of infringement in the past and have been able to resolve such claims without having a material impact on our business. As the number of patents, copyrights and other intellectual property rights in our industry increases, and as the coverage of these rights and the functionality of the products in the market further overlap, we believe that we may face additional infringement claims. Such claims, whether or not valid, could result in substantial costs and diversion of our resources. A third party claiming infringement may also obtain an injunction or other equitable relief, which could effectively block the distribution or sale of allegedly infringing products, which would adversely affect our customer relationships and negatively impact our revenues.
 
The communications industry is heavily regulated. We must obtain regulatory approvals to manufacture and sell our products, and our customers must obtain approvals to operate our products. Any failure or delay by us or any of our customers to obtain such approvals could negatively impact our ability to sell our products.
 
Various governmental agencies have adopted regulations that impose stringent radio frequency emissions standards on the communications industry. Future regulations may require that we alter the manner in which radio signals are transmitted or otherwise alter the equipment transmitting such signals. The enactment by governments of new laws or regulations or a change in the interpretation of existing regulations could negatively impact the market for our products.
 
The increasing demand for wireless communications has exerted pressure on regulatory bodies worldwide to adopt new standards for such products, generally following extensive investigation and deliberation over competing technologies. The delays inherent in this type of governmental approval process have caused, and may continue to cause, the cancellation, postponement or rescheduling of the installation of communications systems by our customers. These types of unanticipated delays would result in delayed or cancelled customer orders.
 
The wireless communications infrastructure equipment industry is extremely competitive and is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product development, rapid product obsolescence, evolving industry standards and significant price erosion over the life of a product. If we are unable to compete effectively, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.
 
Our products compete on the basis of the following characteristics:
 
 
performance;
 
 
functionality;
 
 
reliability;
 
 
pricing;
 
 
quality;
 
 
designs that can be efficiently manufactured in large volumes;
 
 
time-to-market delivery capabilities; and
 
 
compliance with industry standards.
 
If we fail to address the above factors, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.


 
Our current competitors include CommScope, Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc., Japan Radio Co., Ltd., Kathrein-Werke KG, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, and Radio Frequency Systems, in addition to a number of privately held companies throughout the world, subsidiaries of certain multinational corporations and the internal manufacturing operations and design groups of the leading wireless infrastructure manufacturers such as Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Huawei, Motorola, Nokia Siemens and Samsung. Some competitors have adopted aggressive pricing strategies in an attempt to gain market share, which in turn, has caused us to lower our prices in order to remain competitive. Such pricing actions have had an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, some competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing, sales, marketing and other resources than we do and have achieved greater name recognition for their products and technologies than we have. If we are unable to successfully increase our market penetration or our overall share of the wireless communications infrastructure equipment market, our revenues will decline, which would negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
Our failure to enhance our existing products or to develop and introduce new products that meet changing customer requirements and evolving technological standards could have a negative impact on our ability to sell our products.
 
To succeed, we must improve current products and develop and introduce new products that are competitive in terms of price, performance and quality. These products must adequately address the requirements of wireless infrastructure manufacturing customers and end-users. To develop new products, we invest in the research and development of wireless communications network products and coverage solutions. We target our research and development efforts on major wireless network deployments worldwide, which cover a broad range of frequency and transmission protocols. In addition, we are currently working on products for next generation networks, as well as development projects for products requested by our customers and improvements to our existing products. The deployment of a wireless network may be delayed which could result in the failure of a particular research or development effort to generate a revenue producing product. Additionally, the new products we develop may not achieve market acceptance or may not be able to be manufactured cost effectively in sufficient volumes. Our research and development efforts are generally funded internally and our customers do not normally pay for our research and development efforts. These costs are expensed as incurred. Therefore, if our efforts are not successful at creating or improving products that are purchased by our customers, there will be a negative impact on our operating results and financial condition due to high research and development expenses.
 
Our business is subject to the risks of earthquakes and other natural catastrophic events, and to interruptions by man made problems such as computer viruses or terrorism.
 
Our corporate headquarters and a large portion of our U.S. based research and development operations are located in the State of California in regions known for seismic activity. In addition, we have production facilities and have outsourced some of our production to contract manufacturers in Asia, another region known for seismic activity. A significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake in either of these regions, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, despite our implementation of network security measures, our servers are vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins, and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 
At times over the past year, our stock price has not met the minimum bid price for continued listing on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. Our ability to publicly or privately sell equity securities and the liquidity of our Common Stock could be adversely affected if we are delisted from the NASDAQ Global Select Market or if we are unable to transfer our listing to another stock market.
 
The bid price for our Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market was below $1.00 for a significant period of time over the past four fiscal quarters.  The NASDAQ Marketplace Rules provide that one of the continuing listing requirements for an issuer’s common stock is having a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share.  Due to the current economic crisis, NASDAQ announced a moratorium on the enforcement of this minimum bid requirement.  However, this moratorium was rescinded on July 31, 2009, and NASDAQ has not indicated an intention to reinstate the moratorium.  We cannot control whether NASDAQ will reinstate the moratorium again in the future or whether NASDAQ will make any other concessions to allow issuers to avoid potential delisting.  Accordingly, if the bid price of our Common Stock does not stay above $1.00 per share, we risk being delisted from the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
 
If our Common Stock is delisted by NASDAQ, our Common Stock may be eligible to trade on the OTC Bulletin Board maintained by NASDAQ, another over-the-counter quotation system, or on the pink sheets. Each of these alternatives will likely result in it being more difficult for investors to dispose of, or obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our Common Stock. In addition, there can be no assurance that our Common Stock will be eligible for trading on any of such alternative exchanges or markets.


 
In addition, delisting from NASDAQ could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital through the public or private sale of equity securities. Delisting from NASDAQ also would make trading our Common Stock more difficult for investors, potentially leading to further declines in our share price and inhibiting a stockholder’s ability to liquidate all or part of their investment in Powerwave.
 
The price of our Common Stock has been, and may continue to be, volatile and our shareholders may not be able to resell shares of our Common Stock at or above the price paid for such shares.
 
The price for shares of our Common Stock has exhibited high levels of volatility with significant volume and price fluctuations, which makes our Common Stock unsuitable for many investors. For example, for the two years ended December 28, 2008, the closing price of our Common Stock ranged from a high of $7.45 to a low of $0.40 per share. During the first nine months of 2009, the closing price of our Common Stock ranged from a high of $1.72 per share to a low of $0.23 per share. At times, the fluctuations in the price of our Common Stock may have been unrelated to our operating performance. These broad fluctuations may negatively impact the market price of shares of our Common Stock. The price of our Common Stock may also have been influenced by:
 
 
fluctuations in our results of operations or the operations of our competitors or customers;
 
 
the aggregate amount of our outstanding debt and perceptions about our ability to make debt service payments;
 
 
failure of our results of operations and sales revenues to meet the expectations of stock market analysts and investors;
 
 
reductions in wireless infrastructure demand or expectations regarding future wireless infrastructure demand by our customers;
 
 
delays or postponement of wireless infrastructure deployments, including new 3G deployments;
 
 
changes in stock market analyst recommendations regarding us, our competitors or our customers;
 
 
the timing and announcements of technological innovations, new products or financial results by us or our competitors;
 
 
lawsuits attempting to allege misconduct by the Company and its officers;
 
 
increases in the number of shares of our Common Stock outstanding; and
 
 
changes in the wireless industry.  
 
In addition, the potential conversion of our outstanding convertible debt instruments would add approximately 29.0 million shares of Common Stock to our outstanding shares. Such an increase may lead to sales of such shares or the perception that such sales may occur, either of which may adversely affect the market for, and the market price of, our Common Stock. Any potential future sale or issuance of shares of our Common Stock or instruments convertible or exchangeable into shares of our Common Stock, or the perception that such sales or transactions could occur, could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock.
 
Based on the above, we expect that our stock price will continue to be extremely volatile. Therefore, we cannot guarantee that our investors will be able to resell our Common Stock at or above its acquisition price.
 
Failure to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting could adversely affect our business and the market price of our Common Stock.
 
Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to assess the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and provide a management report on our internal controls over financial reporting in all annual reports. This report contains, among other matters, a statement as to whether or not our internal controls over financial reporting are effective and the disclosure of any material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting identified by management. Section 404 also requires our independent registered public accounting firm to audit management’s report.
 
The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) provides a framework for companies to assess and improve their internal control systems. Auditing Standard No. 5 provides the professional standards and related performance guidance for auditors to report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting under Section 404. Management’s assessment of internal controls over financial reporting requires management to make subjective judgments and, particularly because Section 404 and Auditing Standard No. 5 are newly effective, some of the judgments will be in areas that may be open to interpretation. Therefore, our management’s report on our internal controls over financial reporting may be difficult to prepare, and our auditors may not agree with our management’s assessment.


 
While we currently believe our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, we are required to comply with Section 404 on an annual basis. If, in the future, we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting during this continuous evaluation process, our management may not be able to assert that such internal controls are effective. Although we currently anticipate being able to continue to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 in a timely fashion, we cannot be certain as to the timing of completion for our future evaluation, testing and any required remediation due in large part to the fact that there are limited precedents available by which to measure compliance with these new requirements. Therefore, if we are unable to assert that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective in the future, or if our auditors are unable to attest that our management’s report is fairly stated or they are unable to express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would have an adverse effect on our business and the market price of our Common Stock.
 
Our shareholder rights plan and charter documents could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would be beneficial to our shareholders.
 
Our shareholder rights plan and certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and Delaware law are intended to encourage potential acquirers to negotiate with us and allow our Board of Directors the opportunity to consider alternative proposals in the interest of maximizing shareholder value. However, such provisions may also discourage acquisition proposals or delay or prevent a change in control, which in turn, could harm our stock price and our shareholders.
 


ITEM 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
 
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
The following table details the repurchases that were made during the third quarter of 2009:
 

Period
 
Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
   
Average
Price
per
Share
   
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plan
   
Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares
That May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plan
 
               
(In thousands)
   
(In thousands)
 
June 29 – August 2
   
     
     
     
 
August 3 – August 30
   
8,490
(1)
 
$
1.23
     
     
 
August 31 – September 27
   
     
     
     
 
 
 
 


(1)  
During August 2009, 8,490 shares of Common Stock were surrendered to cover tax withholding obligations with respect to the vesting of 23,750 shares under restricted stock grants.
 


 
ITEM 3.
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
 
Not applicable.
 
 
ITEM 4.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
 
The 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company was held on August 12, 2009. The following matters were submitted to a vote of the Company’s shareholders:
 
1. Election of Directors. The following directors were elected to hold office until the 2010 Annual Meeting and until their successors have been elected and have qualified to hold such office. The results of the election for each director are as follows:
 
     
Directors
 
 
 
Number of Votes
 
 
Moiz M. Beguwala
For
114,304,891
 
Withheld
3,384,807
Ken J. Bradley
For
115,342,233
 
Withheld
2,347,465
Ronald J. Buschur
For
113,648,987
 
Withheld
4,040,711
John L. Clendenin
For
114,672,520
 
Withheld
3,017,178
David L. George
For
114,132,476
 
Withheld
3,557,222
Eugene L. Goda
For
114,409,274
 
Withheld
3,280,424
Carl W. Neun
For
114,786,459
 
Withheld
2,903,239
 
 
2.
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2009. The ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2009 was approved. The voting results are as follows:
 
   
 
Number of Votes
 
 
For
116,085,740
Against
1,070,496
Abstentions
533,462
Broker Non-Votes
N/A
 
 
 
ITEM 5.
 
Not applicable.
 


 
ITEM 6.
 
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Description
31.1
 
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act.
     
31.2
 
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act.
     
32.1
 
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.*
     
32.2
 
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.*
 
 

*
In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K, this exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
 


 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
         
Date: October 30, 2009
 
POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
         
     
By:
/s/    KEVIN T. MICHAELS
       
Kevin T. Michaels
       
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
 




Exhibit
Number
 
 
 
Description
31.1
 
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act.
 
 
 
31.2
 
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act.
 
 
 
32.1
 
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.*
 
 
 
32.2
 
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.*
 
 
 

*
In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K, this exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.