Attached files

file filename
EX-2.1 - EXHIBIT 2.1 - US AIRWAYS GROUP INCc91298exv2w1.htm
EX-3.1 - EXHIBIT 3.1 - US AIRWAYS GROUP INCc91298exv3w1.htm
EX-10.1 - EXHIBIT 10.1 - US AIRWAYS GROUP INCc91298exv10w1.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - US AIRWAYS GROUP INCc91298exv32w2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - US AIRWAYS GROUP INCc91298exv31w1.htm
EX-10.5 - EXHIBIT 10.5 - US AIRWAYS GROUP INCc91298exv10w5.htm
EX-31.4 - EXHIBIT 31.4 - US AIRWAYS GROUP INCc91298exv31w4.htm
EX-10.4 - EXHIBIT 10.4 - US AIRWAYS GROUP INCc91298exv10w4.htm
EX-31.3 - EXHIBIT 31.3 - US AIRWAYS GROUP INCc91298exv31w3.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - US AIRWAYS GROUP INCc91298exv32w1.htm
EX-10.3 - EXHIBIT 10.3 - US AIRWAYS GROUP INCc91298exv10w3.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - US AIRWAYS GROUP INCc91298exv31w2.htm
EX-10.2 - EXHIBIT 10.2 - US AIRWAYS GROUP INCc91298exv10w2.htm
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
     
þ   Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
or
     
o   Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
US Airways Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Commission File No. 1-8444)
54-1194634 (IRS Employer Identification No.)
111 West Rio Salado Parkway, Tempe, Arizona 85281
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
US Airways, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Commission File No. 1-8442)
53-0218143 (IRS Employer Identification No.)
111 West Rio Salado Parkway, Tempe, Arizona 85281
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(480) 693-0800
(Registrants’ telephone number, including area code)
Delaware
(State of Incorporation of all Registrants)
Indicate by check mark whether each registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether each registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
                 
US Airways Group, Inc.
  Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer þ   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
US Airways, Inc.
  Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer þ   Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
                 
US Airways Group, Inc.
  Yes   o   No   þ
US Airways, Inc.
  Yes   o   No   þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
                 
US Airways Group, Inc.
  Yes   þ   No   o
US Airways, Inc.
  Yes   þ   No   o
As of October 16, 2009, there were approximately 161,102,717 shares of US Airways Group, Inc. common stock outstanding.
As of October 16, 2009, US Airways, Inc. had 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding, all of which were held by US Airways Group, Inc.
 
 

 

 


 

US Airways Group, Inc.
US Airways, Inc.
Form 10-Q
Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2009
Table of Contents
         
    Page  
       
 
       
       
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    7  
 
       
    8  
 
       
       
 
       
    17  
 
       
    18  
 
       
    19  
 
       
    20  
 
       
    28  
 
       
    60  
 
       
    61  
 
       
       
 
       
    62  
 
       
    62  
 
       
    71  
 
       
    72  
 
       
 Exhibit 2.1
 Exhibit 3.1
 Exhibit 10.1
 Exhibit 10.2
 Exhibit 10.3
 Exhibit 10.4
 Exhibit 10.5
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 31.3
 Exhibit 31.4
 Exhibit 32.1
 Exhibit 32.2

 

2


Table of Contents

This combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is filed by US Airways Group, Inc. (“US Airways Group”) and its wholly owned subsidiary US Airways, Inc. (“US Airways”). References in this Form 10-Q to “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” refer to US Airways Group and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
Certain of the statements contained in this report should be considered “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “could,” “should,” and “continue” and similar terms used in connection with statements regarding, among others, our outlook, expected fuel costs, the revenue environment, and our expected financial performance. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the benefits of the business combination transaction involving America West Holdings Corporation (“America West Holdings”) and US Airways Group, including future financial and operating results, our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results and financial position to differ materially from these statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described below under Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors,” and the following:
   
the impact of future significant operating losses;
   
economic conditions and their impact on passenger demand and related revenues;
   
a reduction in the availability of financing and changes in prevailing interest rates that result in increased costs of financing;
   
our high level of fixed obligations and our ability to obtain and maintain financing for operations and other purposes and operate pursuant to the terms of our financing facilities (particularly the financial covenants);
   
the impact of fuel price volatility, significant disruptions in the supply of aircraft fuel and further significant increases to fuel prices;
   
our ability to maintain adequate liquidity;
   
labor costs and relations with unionized employees generally and the impact and outcome of labor negotiations, including our ability to complete the integration of the labor groups of US Airways Group and America West Holdings;
   
our reliance on vendors and service providers and our ability to obtain and maintain commercially reasonable terms with those vendors and service providers;
   
our reliance on automated systems and the impact of any failure or disruption of these systems;
   
the impact of the integration of our business units;
   
the impact of changes in our business model;
   
competitive practices in the industry, including significant fare restructuring activities, capacity reductions and in court or out of court restructuring by major airlines;
   
the impact of industry consolidation;
   
our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;
   
the impact of global instability, including the current instability in the Middle East, the continuing impact of the military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan and the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and the potential impact of future hostilities, terrorist attacks, infectious disease outbreaks or other global events that affect travel behavior;
   
changes in government legislation and regulation;
   
our ability to obtain and maintain adequate facilities and infrastructure to operate and grow our route network;
   
the impact of environmental laws and regulations;

 

3


Table of Contents

   
costs of ongoing data security compliance requirements and the impact of any data security breach;
   
interruptions or disruptions in service at one or more of our hub airports;
   
the impact of any accident involving our aircraft;
   
delays in scheduled aircraft deliveries or other loss of anticipated fleet capacity;
   
the impact of weather conditions and seasonality of airline travel;
   
the cyclical nature of the airline industry;
   
the impact of possible future increases in insurance costs and disruptions to insurance markets;
   
the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;
   
our ability to use NOLs and certain other tax attributes;
   
our ability to maintain contracts that are critical to our operations;
   
our ability to attract and retain customers; and
   
other risks and uncertainties listed from time to time in our reports to and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
All of the forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the factors discussed in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. There may be other factors of which we are not currently aware that may affect matters discussed in the forward-looking statements and may also cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed. We assume no obligation to publicly update or supplement any forward-looking statement to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting these estimates other than as required by law. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q or as of the dates indicated in the statements.
Part I. Financial Information
This combined Form 10-Q is filed by US Airways Group and US Airways and includes the financial statements of each company in Item 1A and Item 1B, respectively.

 

4


Table of Contents

Item 1A.  
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of US Airways Group, Inc.
US Airways Group, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In millions, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months     Nine Months  
    Ended September 30,     Ended September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Operating revenues:
                               
Mainline passenger
  $ 1,757     $ 2,197     $ 5,092     $ 6,364  
Express passenger
    662       771       1,856       2,230  
Cargo
    23       37       67       111  
Other
    277       256       817       652  
 
                       
Total operating revenues
    2,719       3,261       7,832       9,357  
Operating expenses:
                               
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
    534       1,110       1,353       3,018  
Loss (gain) on fuel hedging instruments, net
    2       420       7       (80 )
Salaries and related costs
    553       567       1,653       1,701  
Express expenses
    654       844       1,882       2,400  
Aircraft rent
    171       183       523       544  
Aircraft maintenance
    174       188       532       601  
Other rent and landing fees
    148       137       422       424  
Selling expenses
    99       120       291       340  
Special items, net
    15       8       22       67  
Depreciation and amortization
    63       52       185       159  
Goodwill impairment
                      622  
Other
    300       321       859       982  
 
                       
Total operating expenses
    2,713       3,950       7,729       10,778  
 
                       
Operating income (loss)
    6       (689 )     103       (1,421 )
Nonoperating income (expense):
                               
Interest income
    5       19       17       69  
Interest expense, net
    (81 )     (58 )     (229 )     (176 )
Other, net
    (10 )     (135 )     (16 )     (140 )
 
                       
Total nonoperating expense, net
    (86 )     (174 )     (228 )     (247 )
 
                       
Loss before income taxes
    (80 )     (863 )     (125 )     (1,668 )
Income tax provision
          3             3  
 
                       
Net loss
  $ (80 )   $ (866 )   $ (125 )   $ (1,671 )
 
                       
Loss per common share:
                               
Basic loss per common share
  $ (0.60 )   $ (8.46 )   $ (1.01 )   $ (17.50 )
Diluted loss per common share
  $ (0.60 )   $ (8.46 )   $ (1.01 )   $ (17.50 )
Shares used for computation (in thousands):
                               
Basic
    132,985       102,406       123,632       95,522  
Diluted
    132,985       102,406       123,632       95,522  
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

US Airways Group, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In millions, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
ASSETS
               
Current assets
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 1,242     $ 1,034  
Investments in marketable securities
          20  
Restricted cash
          186  
Accounts receivable, net
    341       293  
Materials and supplies, net
    237       201  
Prepaid expenses and other
    485       684  
 
           
Total current assets
    2,305       2,418  
Property and equipment
               
Flight equipment
    3,820       3,157  
Ground property and equipment
    887       816  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (1,109 )     (954 )
 
           
 
    3,598       3,019  
Equipment purchase deposits
    322       267  
 
           
Total property and equipment
    3,920       3,286  
Other assets
               
Other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $107 million and $87 million, respectively
    525       545  
Restricted cash
    530       540  
Investments in marketable securities
    228       187  
Other assets
    236       238  
 
           
Total other assets
    1,519       1,510  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 7,744     $ 7,214  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
               
Current liabilities
               
Current maturities of debt and capital leases
  $ 491     $ 362  
Accounts payable
    347       797  
Air traffic liability
    852       698  
Accrued compensation and vacation
    193       158  
Accrued taxes
    138       142  
Other accrued expenses
    836       887  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    2,857       3,044  
Noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits
               
Long-term debt and capital leases, net of current maturities
    4,135       3,623  
Deferred gains and credits, net
    360       383  
Postretirement benefits other than pensions
    103       108  
Employee benefit liabilities and other
    549       550  
 
           
Total noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits
    5,147       4,664  
Commitments and contingencies
               
Stockholders’ deficit
               
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized, 161,518,096 and 161,102,048 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009; 114,527,377 and 114,113,384 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008
    2       1  
Additional paid-in capital
    2,103       1,789  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    109       65  
Accumulated deficit
    (2,461 )     (2,336 )
Treasury stock, common stock, 416,048 and 413,993 shares at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
    (13 )     (13 )
 
           
Total stockholders’ deficit
    (260 )     (494 )
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
  $ 7,744     $ 7,214  
 
           
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

US Airways Group, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
                 
    Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2009     2008  
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
  $ 130     $ (583 )
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Purchases of property and equipment
    (676 )     (755 )
Purchases of marketable securities
          (299 )
Sales of marketable securities
    20       416  
Proceeds from sale of other investments
          3  
Decrease (increase) in long-term restricted cash
    10       (117 )
Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment
    55       17  
Increase in equipment purchase deposits
    (55 )     (97 )
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (646 )     (832 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Repayments of debt and capital lease obligations
    (271 )     (205 )
Proceeds from issuance of debt
    803       669  
Deferred financing costs
    (11 )     (8 )
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net
    203       179  
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    724       635  
 
           
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    208       (780 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    1,034       1,948  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 1,242     $ 1,168  
 
           
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
               
Note payables issued for aircraft purchases
  $ 136     $  
Interest payable converted to debt
    29        
Maintenance payable converted to debt
    13        
Net unrealized gain on available for sale securities
    (51 )      
Supplemental information:
               
Interest paid
  $ 165     $ 173  
Income taxes paid
           
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

7


Table of Contents

US Airways Group, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of US Airways Group, Inc. (“US Airways Group” or the “Company”) should be read in conjunction with the financial statements contained in US Airways Group’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of US Airways Group and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Wholly owned subsidiaries include US Airways, Inc. (“US Airways”), Piedmont Airlines, Inc. (“Piedmont”), PSA Airlines, Inc. (“PSA”), Material Services Company, Inc. (“MSC”) and Airways Assurance Limited, LLC (“AAL”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Management believes that all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of results, consisting of normally recurring items, have been included in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the interim periods presented. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the 2009 presentation. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The principal areas of judgment relate to passenger revenue recognition, impairment of long-lived and intangible assets, valuation of investments in marketable securities, the frequent traveler program and the deferred tax valuation allowance.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162.” SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. Effective July 1, 2009, the Codification superseded all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement),” as adopted by the Codification on July 1, 2009. FSP APB 14-1 applies to convertible debt instruments that, by their stated terms, may be settled in cash (or other assets) upon conversion, including partial cash settlement of the conversion option. FSP APB 14-1 requires bifurcation of the instrument into a debt component that is initially recorded at fair value and an equity component. The difference between the fair value of the debt component and the initial proceeds from issuance of the instrument is recorded as a component of equity. The liability component of the debt instrument is accreted to par using the effective yield method; accretion is reported as a component of interest expense. The equity component is not subsequently re-valued as long as it continues to qualify for equity treatment. FSP APB 14-1 must be applied retrospectively to previously issued cash-settleable convertible instruments as well as prospectively to newly issued instruments. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
In September 2005, the Company issued a total of $144 million principal amount of 7% Senior Convertible Notes due 2020 (the “7% notes”). As of September 30, 2009, $74 million of principal amount remained outstanding under the 7% notes. The holders of these notes may convert, at any time prior to the earlier of the business day prior to the redemption date and the second business day preceding the maturity date, any outstanding notes (or portions thereof) into shares of the Company’s common stock, at an initial conversion rate of 41.4508 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $24.12 per share). In lieu of delivery of shares of common stock upon conversion of all or any portion of the 7% notes, the Company may elect to pay cash or a combination of shares and cash to holders surrendering notes for conversion. The 7% notes are subject to the provisions of FSP APB 14-1 since the 7% notes can be settled in cash upon conversion.

 

8


Table of Contents

The Company adopted FSP APB 14-1 on January 1, 2009. The Company concluded that the fair value of the equity component of the 7% notes at the time of issuance in 2005 was $47 million. Upon retrospective application, the adoption resulted in a $29 million increase in accumulated deficit at December 31, 2008, comprised of non-cash interest expense of $17 million for the years 2005-2008 and non-cash losses on debt extinguishment of $12 million related to the partial conversion of certain of the 7% notes to common stock in 2006. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the carrying value of the equity component was $40 million. The principal amount of the outstanding notes, the unamortized discount and the net carrying value at September 30, 2009 was $74 million, $7 million and $67 million, respectively, and at December 31, 2008 was $74 million, $11 million and $63 million, respectively. The remaining period over which the unamortized discount will be recognized is one year. The Company recognized $1 million and $4 million in non-cash interest expense in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and $1 million and $3 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, related to the adoption of FSP APB 14-1. In addition, the Company recognized $2 million and $4 million in cash interest expense in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and $2 million and $4 million in cash interest expense in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. The following table presents the December 31, 2008 balance sheet line items affected as adjusted and as originally reported (in millions).
                 
    December 31, 2008  
    As Adjusted     As Reported  
Long-term debt and capital leases, net of current maturities
  $ 3,623     $ 3,634  
Additional paid-in capital
    1,789       1,749  
Accumulated deficit
    (2,336 )     (2,307 )
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments,” as adopted by the Codification on July 1, 2009. This FSP changes existing guidance for determining whether an impairment of debt securities is other-than-temporary. The FSP requires other-than-temporary impairments to be separated into the amount representing the decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from a security (referred to as credit losses) which is recognized in earnings and the amount related to other factors (referred to as noncredit losses) which is recognized in other comprehensive income. This noncredit loss component of the impairment may only be classified in other comprehensive income if both of the following conditions are met (a) the holder of the security concludes that it does not intend to sell the security and (b) the holder concludes that it is more likely than not that the holder will not be required to sell the security before the security recovers its value. If these conditions are not met, the noncredit loss must also be recognized in earnings. When adopting the FSP, an entity is required to record a cumulative effect adjustment as of the beginning of the period of adoption to reclassify the noncredit component of a previously recognized other-than-temporary impairment from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 as of April 1, 2009. The Company does not meet the conditions necessary to recognize the noncredit loss component of its auction rate securities in other comprehensive income. Accordingly, the Company did not reclassify any previously recognized other-than-temporary impairment losses from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income and the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 had no material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 8 for further discussion of the Company’s investments in marketable securities.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly,” as adopted by the Codification on July 1, 2009. This FSP provides additional guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. The FSP also provides additional guidance on circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted FSP FAS 157-4 during the second quarter of 2009, and its application had no impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” as adopted by the Codification on July 1, 2009, which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 provides guidance on the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The Company adopted SFAS No. 165 during the second quarter of 2009, and its application had no impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date the accompanying financial statements were issued, which was October 21, 2009.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46(R),” which changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another entity is based on, among other things, the other entity’s purpose and design and the reporting entity’s ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact the other entity’s economic performance. SFAS No. 167 will require a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A reporting entity will be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects the reporting entity’s financial statements. SFAS No. 167 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 167 and has not yet determined the impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

9


Table of Contents

In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) — Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements.” ASU No. 2009-13 addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which is based on: (a) vendor-specific objective evidence; (b) third-party evidence; or (c) estimates. This guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. In addition, this guidance significantly expands required disclosures related to a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. ASU No. 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and early adoption is permitted. A company may elect, but will not be required, to adopt the amendments in ASU No. 2009-13 retrospectively for all prior periods. Management is currently evaluating the requirements of ASU No. 2009-13 and has not yet determined the impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
2. Special Items, Net
Special items, net as shown on the condensed consolidated statements of operations included the following charges for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in millions):
                                 
    Three Months     Nine Months  
    Ended September 30,     Ended September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Aircraft costs (a)
  $ 10     $     $ 16     $ 6  
Severance and other charges (b)
    5       8       6       8  
Merger related transition expenses (c)
                      35  
Asset impairment charges (d)
                      18  
 
                       
Special items, net
  $ 15     $ 8     $ 22     $ 67  
 
                       
 
     
(a)  
In connection with previously announced capacity reductions, the Company recorded $10 million and $16 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, in charges for aircraft costs. The Company also recognized $6 million in aircraft costs in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
 
(b)  
The Company recorded $5 million and $6 million in severance and other charges in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The Company also recognized $8 million in severance charges related to capacity reductions in the third quarter of 2008.
 
(c)  
In connection with the effort to consolidate functions and integrate organizations, procedures and operations, the Company incurred $35 million of merger related transition expenses in the first nine months of 2008. These expenses included $12 million in uniform costs to transition employees to the new US Airways uniforms; $5 million in applicable employment tax expenses related to contractual benefits granted to certain current and former employees as a result of the merger; $6 million in compensation expenses for equity awards granted in connection with the merger to retain key employees through the integration period; $5 million of aircraft livery costs; $4 million in professional and technical fees related to the integration of airline operations systems; and $3 million in other expenses.
 
(d)  
In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded $18 million in non-cash impairment charges related to the decline in the fair value of certain spare parts associated with the Company’s Boeing 737 aircraft fleet.

 

10


Table of Contents

3. Loss Per Common Share
Basic earnings (loss) per common share (“EPS”) is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus the effect of potentially dilutive shares of common stock outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Potentially dilutive shares include outstanding employee stock options, employee stock appreciation rights, employee restricted stock units and convertible debt. The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted EPS (in millions, except share and per share amounts):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,     September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Basic and diluted loss per share:
                               
Net loss
  $ (80 )   $ (866 )   $ (125 )   $ (1,671 )
 
                       
Weighted average common shares outstanding
(in thousands)
    132,985       102,406       123,632       95,522  
 
                       
Basic and diluted loss per share
  $ (0.60 )   $ (8.46 )   $ (1.01 )   $ (17.50 )
 
                       
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, 12,128,427 and 11,288,952 shares, respectively, underlying stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because inclusion of such shares would be antidilutive or because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of common stock for the period. In addition, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, 3,048,914 incremental shares from the assumed conversion of the 7% notes were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS due to their antidilutive effect. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, 37,746,174 and 19,357,012 incremental shares, respectively, from the assumed conversion of the 7.25% convertible senior notes were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS due to their antidilutive effect.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, 9,256,697 and 7,602,552 shares, respectively, underlying stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because inclusion of such shares would be antidilutive or because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of common stock for the period. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, 3,048,914 incremental shares from assumed conversion of the 7% notes were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS due to their antidilutive effect.

 

11


Table of Contents

4. Debt
The following table details the Company’s debt (in millions). Variable interest rates listed are the rates as of September 30, 2009.
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Secured
               
Citicorp North America loan, variable interest rate of 2.75%, installments due through 2014
  $ 1,168     $ 1,184  
Equipment loans, aircraft pre-delivery payment financings and other notes payable, fixed and variable interest rates ranging from 1.64% to 10.51%, averaging 4.32%, maturing from 2010 to 2021
    2,226       1,674  
Aircraft enhanced equipment trust certificates (“EETCs”), fixed interest rates ranging from 7.08% to 9.01%, averaging 7.79%, maturing from 2015 to 2022
    505       540  
Slot financing, fixed interest rate of 8.08%, interest only payments until due in 2015
    47       47  
Capital lease obligations, interest rate of 8%, installments due through 2021
    37       39  
Senior secured discount notes, variable interest rate of 5.39%, due in 2009
    32       32  
 
           
 
    4,015       3,516  
Unsecured
               
Barclays prepaid miles, variable interest rate of 5%, interest only payments
    200       200  
Airbus advance, repayments beginning in 2010 through 2018
    237       207  
7% senior convertible notes, interest only payments until due in 2020
    74       74  
7.25% convertible senior notes, interest only payments until due in 2014
    172        
Engine maintenance notes
    54       72  
Industrial development bonds, fixed interest rate of 6.3%, interest only payments until due in 2023
    29       29  
Note payable to Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, fixed interest rate of 6%, interest only payments until due in 2012
    10       10  
Other notes payable, due in 2009 to 2011
    70       45  
 
           
 
    846       637  
 
           
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations
    4,861       4,153  
Less: Total unamortized discount on debt
    (235 )     (168 )
Current maturities, less $1 million and $10 million of unamortized discount on debt at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively
    (491 )     (362 )
 
           
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current maturities
  $ 4,135     $ 3,623  
 
           
The Company was in compliance with the covenants in its debt agreements at September 30, 2009.
7.25% Convertible Senior Notes
In May 2009, US Airways Group issued $172 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014 (the “7.25% notes”) for proceeds, net of expenses, of approximately $168 million. The 7.25% notes bear interest at a rate of 7.25% per annum, which shall be payable semi-annually in arrears on each May 15 and November 15, beginning November 15, 2009. The 7.25% notes mature on May 15, 2014.
Holders may convert their 7.25% notes at their option at any time prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date for the 7.25% notes. Upon conversion, the Company will pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, shares of US Airways Group’s common stock or a combination thereof at the Company’s election. The initial conversion rate for the 7.25% notes is 218.8184 shares of US Airways Group’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $4.57 per share). Such conversion rate is subject to adjustment in certain events.
If the Company undergoes a fundamental change, holders may require the Company to purchase all or a portion of their 7.25% notes for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 7.25% notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the purchase date. A fundamental change includes a person or group (other than the Company or its subsidiaries) becoming the beneficial owner of more than 50% of the voting power of the Company’s capital stock, certain merger or combination transactions, a substantial turnover of the Company’s directors, stockholder approval of the liquidation or dissolution of the Company and the Company’s common stock ceasing to be listed on at least one national securities exchange.
The 7.25% notes rank equal in right of payment to all of the Company’s other existing and future unsecured senior debt and senior in right of payment to the Company’s debt that is expressly subordinated to the 7.25% notes, if any. The 7.25% notes impose no limit on the amount of debt the Company or its subsidiaries may incur. The 7.25% notes are structurally subordinated to all debt and other liabilities and commitments (including trade payables) of the Company’s subsidiaries. The 7.25% notes are also effectively junior to the Company’s secured debt, if any, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt.

 

12


Table of Contents

As the 7.25% notes can be settled in cash upon conversion, for accounting purposes, the 7.25% notes were bifurcated into a debt component that is initially recorded at fair value and an equity component. The Company concluded that the fair value of the equity component of its 7.25% notes is $98 million. The unamortized debt discount at September 30, 2009 is $95 million and the carrying value of the notes is $77 million. The remaining period over which the unamortized debt discount will be recognized as non-cash interest expense is 4.7 years as follows: $3 million in 2009, $12 million in 2010, $16 million in 2011, $22 million in 2012, $29 million in 2013 and $13 million in 2014. The Company recognized $2 million and $3 million in non-cash interest expense in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, related to the amortization of the debt discount.
Other 2009 Financing Transactions
On January 16, 2009, US Airways exercised its right to obtain new loan commitments and incur additional loans under a spare parts loan agreement. In connection with the exercise of that right, Airbus Financial Services funded $50 million in satisfaction of a previous commitment. This loan will mature on October 20, 2014, bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin and is secured by the collateral securing loans under the spare parts loan agreement.
On March 31, 2009, US Airways again exercised its right to obtain new loan commitments and incur additional loans under the spare parts loan agreement and borrowed $50 million. This loan will mature on October 20, 2014, bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin and is secured by the collateral securing loans under the spare parts loan agreement. US Airways used a portion of the proceeds to purchase an A321 aircraft previously leased to US Airways by an affiliate of the debt holder. As a result, this aircraft became unencumbered.
In June 2009, US Airways entered into loan agreements totaling $132 million to finance the acquisition of certain A330-200 aircraft. The loans bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus an applicable margin, contain default provisions and other covenants that are typical in the industry for similar financings and are amortized over seven years with balloon payments at maturity.
In the third quarter of 2009, US Airways utilized backstop financing through the manufacturer totaling $104 million to finance the acquisition of certain A320 family aircraft. The financing bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus an applicable margin, contains default provisions and other covenants that are typical in the industry for similar financings and is amortized over twelve years.
US Airways Group had previously entered into a co-branded credit card agreement with Barclays Bank Delaware. The agreement provides for, among other things, the pre-purchase of frequent flyer miles in the aggregate amount of $200 million. Barclays has agreed that it will pre-purchase additional miles on a monthly basis in an amount equal to the difference between $200 million and the amount of unused miles then outstanding, which purchases average approximately $17 million per month. Among the conditions to this monthly purchase of miles is a requirement that US Airways Group maintain an unrestricted cash balance of at least $1.5 billion. In September 2009, Barclays agreed to temporarily reduce this requirement to $1.35 billion for the months of August through October 2009.
Fair Value of Debt
The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was approximately $3.54 billion and $3.31 billion at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The fair values were estimated using quoted market prices where available. For long-term debt not actively traded, fair values were estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
5. Income Taxes
As of December 31, 2008, the Company had approximately $1.4 billion of gross net operating loss carryforwards (“NOL”) to reduce future federal taxable income, substantially all of which is available to reduce federal taxable income in the calendar year 2009. The NOL expires during the years 2022 through 2028. The Company’s deferred tax asset, which included $1.3 billion of the NOL discussed above, has been subject to a full valuation allowance. The Company also had approximately $77 million of tax-effected state NOL at December 31, 2008.
In assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax asset. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income (including reversals of deferred tax liabilities) during the periods in which those temporary differences will become deductible.
The Company reported a loss in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and did not record a tax provision in any 2009 period.
The Company recorded income tax expense of $3 million in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 related to a reconciliation of the 2007 tax provision to the tax return as filed in the third quarter of 2008.

 

13


Table of Contents

6. Express Expenses
Expenses associated with the Company’s wholly owned regional airlines and affiliate regional airlines operating as US Airways Express are classified as Express expenses on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Express expenses consist of the following (in millions):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
  $ 171     $ 349     $ 438     $ 938  
Salaries and related costs
    63       62       187       189  
Capacity purchases
    271       269       802       798  
Aircraft rent
    13       13       39       38  
Aircraft maintenance
    19       20       62       59  
Other rent and landing fees
    30       35       91       89  
Selling expenses
    41       45       115       127  
Depreciation and amortization
    6       6       18       18  
Other expenses
    40       45       130       144  
 
                       
Express expenses
  $ 654     $ 844     $ 1,882     $ 2,400  
 
                       
7. Derivative Instruments
To manage the risk of changes in aviation fuel prices, the Company periodically enters into derivative contracts comprised of heating oil-based derivative instruments to hedge a portion of its projected jet fuel requirements. Since the third quarter of 2008, the Company has not entered into any new transactions as part of its fuel hedging program and as of September 30, 2009, there were no remaining outstanding fuel hedging contracts.
The Company’s fuel hedging instruments did not qualify for hedge accounting. Accordingly, the derivative hedging instruments were recorded as an asset or liability on the balance sheet at fair value and any changes in fair value were recorded in the period of change as gains or losses on fuel hedging instruments, net in operating expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. The following table details the Company’s loss (gain) on fuel hedging instruments, net (in millions):
                                 
    Three Months     Nine Months  
    Ended September 30,     Ended September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Realized loss (gain)
  $ 50     $ (68 )   $ 382     $ (342 )
Unrealized loss (gain)
    (48 )     488       (375 )     262  
 
                       
Loss (gain) on fuel hedging instruments, net
  $ 2     $ 420     $ 7     $ (80 )
 
                       
The unrealized gains in the 2009 periods were related to the reversal of prior period unrealized losses due to contracts settling in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
8. Investments in Marketable Securities (Noncurrent)
As of September 30, 2009, the Company held auction rate securities totaling $411 million at par value, which are classified as available for sale securities and noncurrent assets on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. Contractual maturities for these auction rate securities range from seven to 43 years, with 62% of the Company’s portfolio maturing within the next 10 years (2016 — 2017), 10% maturing within the next 20 years (2025), 16% maturing within the next 30 years (2033 — 2036) and 12% maturing thereafter (2039 — 2052). With the liquidity issues experienced in the global credit and capital markets, all of the Company’s auction rate securities have experienced failed auctions since August 2007. The estimated fair value of these auction rate securities no longer approximates par value. At September 30, 2009, the fair value of the Company’s auction rate securities was $228 million, a net increase of $14 million from June 30, 2009 and $41 million from December 31, 2008. Refer to Note 9 for discussion on how the Company determines the fair value of its investments in auction rate securities.
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded unrealized gains of $17 million and $51 million, respectively, in other comprehensive income related to the increase in fair value of certain of the Company’s investments in auction rate securities. These unrealized gains were offset by other-than-temporary impairment charges of $3 million and $10 million, respectively, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. These other-than-temporary impairment charges are recorded in other nonoperating expense, net and relate to the decline in fair value of certain of the Company’s investments in auction rate securities.

 

14


Table of Contents

In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded $127 million and $140 million, respectively, of other-than-temporary impairment charges in other nonoperating expense, net. These charges in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, included $103 million and $48 million, respectively, of previously recorded unrealized losses in other comprehensive income.
The Company continues to monitor the market for auction rate securities and consider its impact (if any) on the fair value of its investments. If the current market conditions deteriorate, the Company may be required to record additional impairment charges in other nonoperating expense, net in future periods.
9. Fair Value Measurements
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows (in millions):
                                         
            Quoted Prices in     Significant Other     Significant        
            Active Markets for     Observable     Unobservable        
            Identical Assets     Inputs     Inputs     Valuation  
    Fair Value     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Technique  
At September 30, 2009
                                       
Investments in marketable securities (noncurrent)
  $ 228     $     $     $ 228       (1 )
At December 31, 2008
                                       
Investments in marketable securities (noncurrent)
  $ 187     $     $     $ 187       (1 )
Fuel hedging derivatives
    (375 )           (375 )           (2 )
     
(1)  
The Company estimated the fair value of its auction rate securities based on the following: (i) the underlying structure of each security; (ii) the present value of future principal and interest payments discounted at rates considered to reflect current market conditions; (iii) consideration of the probabilities of default, passing a future auction, or repurchase at par for each period; and (iv) estimates of the recovery rates in the event of default for each security. These estimated fair values could change significantly based on future market conditions. Refer to Note 8 for further discussion of the Company’s investments in marketable securities.
 
(2)  
As the Company’s fuel hedging derivative instruments were not traded on a market exchange, the fair values were determined using valuation models which included assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in the underlying markets. The fair value of fuel hedging derivatives is recorded in accounts payable on the consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 7 for further discussion of the Company’s fuel hedging derivatives.
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) are as follows (in millions):
         
    Investments in  
    Marketable  
    Securities  
    (Noncurrent)  
Balance at December 31, 2008
  $ 187  
Unrealized gains recorded to other comprehensive income
    51  
Impairment losses included in other nonoperating expense, net
    (10 )
 
     
Balance at September 30, 2009
  $ 228  
 
     
10. Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The Company’s other comprehensive loss consists of the following (in millions):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Net loss
  $ (80 )   $ (866 )   $ (125 )   $ (1,671 )
Unrealized gains on available for sale securities
    17             51        
Recognition of previous unrealized losses now deemed other-than-temporary
          103             48  
Pension and other postretirement benefits
    (2 )           (7 )     (3 )
 
                       
Total comprehensive loss
  $ (65 )   $ (763 )   $ (81 )   $ (1,626 )
 
                       

 

15


Table of Contents

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows (in millions):
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Pension and other postretirement benefits
  $ 58     $ 65  
Accumulated net unrealized gains on available for sale securities
    51        
 
           
Accumulated other comprehensive income
  $ 109     $ 65  
 
           
11. Flight 1549
On January 15, 2009, US Airways flight 1549 was involved in an accident in New York that resulted in the aircraft ditching in the Hudson River. The Airbus A320 aircraft was en route to Charlotte from LaGuardia with 150 passengers and a crew of five onboard. All aboard survived and there were no serious injuries. US Airways has insurance coverage for both the aircraft (which is a total loss) as well as costs resulting from the accident, and there are no applicable deductibles.
The aircraft involved in the flight 1549 accident was leased by US Airways. In the first quarter of 2009, US Airways exercised its aircraft substitution right under the lease agreement and transferred title of an owned Airbus A320 to the lessor in substitution for the Airbus A320 aircraft that was involved in the accident. This transferred aircraft will continue to be leased to US Airways under the same terms and conditions of the lease agreement. In connection with this transaction, US Airways extinguished $22 million of debt associated with the previously owned aircraft that was transferred to the lessor.
12. Stockholders’ Equity
In May 2009, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 15.2 million shares of common stock, as well as the full exercise of 2.28 million shares of common stock included in an overallotment option, at an offering price of $3.97 per share. Net proceeds from the offering, after underwriting discounts and commissions, were $66 million.
In September 2009, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 26.3 million shares of common stock, as well as the exercise of 2.7 million shares of common stock included in an overallotment option, at a price of $4.75 per share. Net proceeds from the offering, after offering costs, were $137 million.
13. Slot Exchange
In August 2009, the Company and US Airways entered into a mutual asset purchase and sale agreement with Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”). Pursuant to the agreement, US Airways will transfer to Delta certain assets related to flight operations at LaGuardia Airport in New York, including 125 pairs of slots currently used to provide US Airways Express service at LaGuardia. Delta will transfer to US Airways certain assets related to flight operations at Reagan National Airport in Washington, D.C., including 42 pairs of slots, and the authority to serve Sao Paulo, Brazil and Tokyo, Japan. One slot equals one take-off or landing, and each pair of slots equals one roundtrip flight. The agreement is structured as two simultaneous asset sales and is expected to be cash neutral to US Airways. The closing of the transactions under the agreement is subject to certain closing conditions, including approvals from a number of government agencies including the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Federal Aviation Administration and The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.
14. Subsequent Event
US Airways entered into a term sheet to sell 10 of its Embraer 190 aircraft to Republic Airline Inc. (“Republic”). Through October 21, 2009, five of the 10 aircraft sales have been completed and the remaining five are expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2009. US Airways will lease back eight of the 10 aircraft from Republic for periods ranging from one to seven months. Debt outstanding on the 10 Embraer aircraft was $217 million at September 30, 2009. In connection with this transaction, Republic has agreed to assume the full amount of this debt and release US Airways from its obligations associated with the principal due under the debt. Additionally, at September 30, 2009, US Airways had $35 million outstanding under a loan from Republic (the “Republic loan”). The Republic loan was scheduled to be repaid starting in January 2010 and fully repaid in October 2011. In accordance with the term sheet, the full amount outstanding under the Republic loan will be applied to the purchase price of the 10 aircraft. US Airways expects to incur an aggregate loss of approximately $47 million from the sale of the 10 aircraft and write-off of debt discount associated with the Republic loan in the fourth quarter of 2009.

 

16


Table of Contents

Item 1B.  
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of US Airways, Inc.
US Airways, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months     Nine Months  
    Ended September 30,     Ended September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Operating revenues:
                               
Mainline passenger
  $ 1,757     $ 2,197     $ 5,092     $ 6,364  
Express passenger
    662       771       1,856       2,230  
Cargo
    23       37       67       111  
Other
    316       288       930       742  
 
                       
Total operating revenues
    2,758       3,293       7,945       9,447  
Operating expenses:
                               
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
    534       1,110       1,353       3,018  
Loss (gain) on fuel hedging instruments, net
    2       420       7       (80 )
Salaries and related costs
    553       567       1,653       1,701  
Express expenses
    689       872       1,975       2,485  
Aircraft rent
    171       183       523       544  
Aircraft maintenance
    174       188       532       601  
Other rent and landing fees
    148       137       422       424  
Selling expenses
    99       120       291       340  
Special items, net
    15       8       22       67  
Depreciation and amortization
    65       55       192       166  
Goodwill impairment
                      622  
Other
    307       321       879       977  
 
                       
Total operating expenses
    2,757       3,981       7,849       10,865  
 
                       
Operating income (loss)
    1       (688 )     96       (1,418 )
Nonoperating income (expense):
                               
Interest income
    5       19       17       68  
Interest expense, net
    (64 )     (48 )     (189 )     (146 )
Other, net
    (10 )     (135 )     (18 )     (140 )
 
                       
Total nonoperating expense, net
    (69 )     (164 )     (190 )     (218 )
 
                       
Loss before income taxes
    (68 )     (852 )     (94 )     (1,636 )
Income tax provision
          3             3  
 
                       
Net loss
  $ (68 )   $ (855 )   $ (94 )   $ (1,639 )
 
                       
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

17


Table of Contents

US Airways, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In millions, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
ASSETS
               
Current assets
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 965     $ 1,026  
Investments in marketable securities
          20  
Restricted cash
          186  
Accounts receivable, net
    338       291  
Materials and supplies, net
    199       163  
Prepaid expenses and other
    473       673  
 
           
Total current assets
    1,975       2,359  
Property and equipment
               
Flight equipment
    3,679       3,017  
Ground property and equipment
    860       791  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (1,059 )     (914 )
 
           
 
    3,480       2,894  
Equipment purchase deposits
    322       267  
 
           
Total property and equipment
    3,802       3,161  
Other assets
               
Other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $100 million and $81 million, respectively
    489       508  
Restricted cash
    530       540  
Investments in marketable securities
    228       187  
Other assets
    199       199  
 
           
Total other assets
    1,446       1,434  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 7,223     $ 6,954  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY (DEFICIT)
               
Current liabilities
               
Current maturities of debt and capital leases
  $ 475     $ 346  
Accounts payable
    329       781  
Payables to related parties, net
    478       985  
Air traffic liability
    852       698  
Accrued compensation and vacation
    184       147  
Accrued taxes
    139       142  
Other accrued expenses
    807       867  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    3,264       3,966  
Noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits
               
Long-term debt and capital leases, net of current maturities
    2,673       2,236  
Deferred gains and credits, net
    334       342  
Postretirement benefits other than pensions
    102       107  
Employee benefit liabilities and other
    521       524  
 
           
Total noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits
    3,630       3,209  
Commitments and contingencies
               
Stockholder’s equity (deficit)
               
Common stock, $1 par value, 1,000 shares issued and outstanding
           
Additional paid-in capital
    2,445       1,845  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    122       78  
Accumulated deficit
    (2,238 )     (2,144 )
 
           
Total stockholder’s equity (deficit)
    329       (221 )
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity (deficit)
  $ 7,223     $ 6,954  
 
           
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

18


Table of Contents

US Airways, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
                 
    Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2009     2008  
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
  $ 211     $ (438 )
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Purchases of property and equipment
    (672 )     (734 )
Purchases of marketable securities
          (299 )
Sales of marketable securities
    20       416  
Proceeds from sale of other investments
          3  
Decrease (increase) in long-term restricted cash
    10       (117 )
Proceeds from dispositions of property and equipment
    55       17  
Increase in equipment purchase deposits
    (55 )     (97 )
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (642 )     (811 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Repayments of debt and capital lease obligations
    (255 )     (189 )
Proceeds from issuance of debt
    631       669  
Deferred financing costs
    (6 )     (8 )
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    370       472  
 
           
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (61 )     (777 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    1,026       1,940  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 965     $ 1,163  
 
           
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
               
Forgiveness of intercompany payable to US Airways Group
  $ 600     $  
Note payables issued for aircraft purchases
    136        
Interest payable converted to debt
    29        
Maintenance payable converted to debt
    13        
Net unrealized gain on available for sale securities
    (51 )      
Supplemental information:
               
Interest paid
  $ 126     $ 101  
Income taxes paid
           
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

19


Table of Contents

US Airways, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of US Airways, Inc. (“US Airways”) should be read in conjunction with the financial statements contained in US Airways’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. US Airways is a wholly owned subsidiary of US Airways Group, Inc. (“US Airways Group”). The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of US Airways and its wholly owned subsidiary, America West Holdings, LLC (“America West Holdings”). America West Airlines, LLC (“AWA”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, FTCHP, LLC, are wholly owned subsidiaries of America West Holdings. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions between US Airways and its wholly owned subsidiaries have been eliminated.
Management believes that all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of results, consisting of normally recurring items, have been included in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the interim periods presented. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the 2009 presentation. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The principal areas of judgment relate to passenger revenue recognition, impairment of long-lived and intangible assets, valuation of investments in marketable securities, the frequent traveler program and the deferred tax valuation allowance.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162.” SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. Effective July 1, 2009, the Codification superseded all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments,” as adopted by the Codification on July 1, 2009. This FSP changes existing guidance for determining whether an impairment of debt securities is other-than-temporary. The FSP requires other-than-temporary impairments to be separated into the amount representing the decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from a security (referred to as credit losses) which is recognized in earnings and the amount related to other factors (referred to as noncredit losses) which is recognized in other comprehensive income. This noncredit loss component of the impairment may only be classified in other comprehensive income if both of the following conditions are met (a) the holder of the security concludes that it does not intend to sell the security and (b) the holder concludes that it is more likely than not that the holder will not be required to sell the security before the security recovers its value. If these conditions are not met, the noncredit loss must also be recognized in earnings. When adopting the FSP, an entity is required to record a cumulative effect adjustment as of the beginning of the period of adoption to reclassify the noncredit component of a previously recognized other-than-temporary impairment from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. US Airways adopted FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 as of April 1, 2009. US Airways does not meet the conditions necessary to recognize the noncredit loss component of its auction rate securities in other comprehensive income. Accordingly, US Airways did not reclassify any previously recognized other-than-temporary impairment losses from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income and the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 had no material impact on US Airways’ condensed consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 8 for further discussion of US Airways’ investments in marketable securities.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly,” as adopted by the Codification on July 1, 2009. This FSP provides additional guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. The FSP also provides additional guidance on circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. US Airways adopted FSP FAS 157-4 during the second quarter of 2009, and its application had no impact on US Airways’ condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

20


Table of Contents

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” as adopted by the Codification on July 1, 2009, which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 provides guidance on the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. US Airways adopted SFAS No. 165 during the second quarter of 2009, and its application had no impact on US Airways’ condensed consolidated financial statements. US Airways evaluated subsequent events through the date the accompanying financial statements were issued, which was October 21, 2009.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46(R),” which changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another entity is based on, among other things, the other entity’s purpose and design and the reporting entity’s ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact the other entity’s economic performance. SFAS No. 167 will require a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A reporting entity will be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects the reporting entity’s financial statements. SFAS No. 167 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 167 and has not yet determined the impact on US Airways’ condensed consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) — Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements.” ASU No. 2009-13 addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which is based on: (a) vendor-specific objective evidence; (b) third-party evidence; or (c) estimates. This guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. In addition, this guidance significantly expands required disclosures related to a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. ASU No. 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and early adoption is permitted. A company may elect, but will not be required, to adopt the amendments in ASU No. 2009-13 retrospectively for all prior periods. Management is currently evaluating the requirements of ASU No. 2009-13 and has not yet determined the impact on US Airways’ condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

21


Table of Contents

2. Special Items, Net
Special items, net as shown on the condensed consolidated statements of operations included the following charges for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in millions):
                                 
    Three Months     Nine Months  
    Ended September 30,     Ended September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Aircraft costs (a)
  $ 10     $     $ 16     $ 6  
Severance and other charges (b)
    5       8       6       8  
Merger related transition expenses (c)
                      35  
Asset impairment charges (d)
                      18  
 
                       
Special items, net
  $ 15     $ 8     $ 22     $ 67  
 
                       
 
     
(a)  
In connection with previously announced capacity reductions, US Airways recorded $10 million and $16 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, in charges for aircraft costs. US Airways also recognized $6 million in aircraft costs in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
 
(b)  
US Airways recorded $5 million and $6 million in severance and other charges in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. US Airways also recognized $8 million in severance charges related to capacity reductions in the third quarter of 2008.
 
(c)  
In connection with the effort to consolidate functions and integrate organizations, procedures and operations, US Airways incurred $35 million of merger related transition expenses in the first nine months of 2008. These expenses included $12 million in uniform costs to transition employees to the new US Airways uniforms; $5 million in applicable employment tax expenses related to contractual benefits granted to certain current and former employees as a result of the merger; $6 million in compensation expenses for equity awards granted in connection with the merger to retain key employees through the integration period; $5 million of aircraft livery costs; $4 million in professional and technical fees related to the integration of airline operations systems; and $3 million in other expenses.
 
(d)  
In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, US Airways recorded $18 million in non-cash impairment charges related to the decline in the fair value of certain spare parts associated with its Boeing 737 aircraft fleet.

 

22


Table of Contents

3. Debt
The following table details US Airways’ debt (in millions). Variable interest rates listed are the rates as of September 30, 2009.
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Secured
               
Equipment loans, aircraft pre-delivery payment financings and other notes payable, fixed and variable interest rates ranging from 1.64% to 10.51%, averaging 4.32%, maturing from 2010 to 2021
  $ 2,226     $ 1,674  
Aircraft enhanced equipment trust certificates (“EETCs”), fixed interest rates ranging from 7.08% to 9.01%, averaging 7.79%, maturing from 2015 to 2022
    505       540  
Slot financing, fixed interest rate of 8.08%, interest only payments until due in 2015
    47       47  
Capital lease obligations, interest rate of 8%, installments due through 2021
    37       39  
Senior secured discount notes, variable interest rate of 5.39%, due in 2009
    32       32  
 
           
 
    2,847       2,332  
Unsecured
               
Airbus advance, repayments beginning in 2010 through 2018
    237       207  
Engine maintenance notes
    54       72  
Industrial development bonds, fixed interest rate of 6.3%, interest only payments until due in 2023
    29       29  
Note payable to Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, fixed interest rate of 6%, interest only payments until due in 2012
    10       10  
Other notes payable, due in 2009 to 2011
    70       45  
 
           
 
    400       363  
 
           
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations
    3,247       2,695  
Less: Total unamortized discount on debt
    (99 )     (113 )
Current maturities, less $1 million and $10 million of unamortized discount on debt at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively
    (475 )     (346 )
 
           
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current maturities
  $ 2,673     $ 2,236  
 
           
US Airways was in compliance with the covenants in its debt agreements at September 30, 2009.
2009 Financing Transactions
On January 16, 2009, US Airways exercised its right to obtain new loan commitments and incur additional loans under a spare parts loan agreement. In connection with the exercise of that right, Airbus Financial Services funded $50 million in satisfaction of a previous commitment. This loan will mature on October 20, 2014, bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin and is secured by the collateral securing loans under the spare parts loan agreement.
On March 31, 2009, US Airways again exercised its right to obtain new loan commitments and incur additional loans under the spare parts loan agreement and borrowed $50 million. This loan will mature on October 20, 2014, bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin and is secured by the collateral securing loans under the spare parts loan agreement. US Airways used a portion of the proceeds to purchase an A321 aircraft previously leased to US Airways by an affiliate of the debt holder. As a result, this aircraft became unencumbered.
In June 2009, US Airways entered into loan agreements totaling $132 million to finance the acquisition of certain A330-200 aircraft. The loans bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus an applicable margin, contain default provisions and other covenants that are typical in the industry for similar financings and are amortized over seven years with balloon payments at maturity.
In the third quarter of 2009, US Airways utilized backstop financing through the manufacturer totaling $104 million to finance the acquisition of certain A320 family aircraft. The financing bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus an applicable margin, contains default provisions and other covenants that are typical in the industry for similar financings and is amortized over twelve years.
Fair Value of Debt
The fair value of US Airways’ long-term debt was approximately $2.61 billion and $2.28 billion at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The fair values were estimated using quoted market prices where available. For long-term debt not actively traded, fair values were estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on US Airways’ current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

 

23


Table of Contents

4. Related Party Transactions
The following represents the net payable balances to related parties (in millions):
                 
    September 30, 2009     December 31, 2008  
US Airways Group
  $ 439     $ 949  
US Airways Group’s wholly owned subsidiaries
    39       36  
 
           
 
  $ 478     $ 985  
 
           
US Airways Group has the ability to move funds freely between operating subsidiaries to support operations. These transfers are recognized as intercompany transactions. In September 2009, US Airways Group contributed $600 million in net intercompany receivables due from US Airways to the capital of US Airways.
The net payable to US Airways Group’s wholly owned subsidiaries consists of amounts due under regional capacity agreements with the other airline subsidiaries and fuel purchase arrangements with a non-airline subsidiary.
5. Income Taxes
US Airways and its wholly owned subsidiaries are part of the US Airways Group consolidated income tax return.
As of December 31, 2008, US Airways had approximately $1.3 billion of gross net operating loss carryforwards (“NOL”) to reduce future federal taxable income, substantially all of which is available to reduce federal taxable income in the calendar year 2009. The NOL expires during the years 2022 through 2028. US Airways’ deferred tax asset, which included $1.2 billion of the NOL discussed above, has been subject to a full valuation allowance. US Airways also had approximately $72 million of tax-effected state NOL at December 31, 2008.
In assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. US Airways has recorded a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax asset. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income (including reversals of deferred tax liabilities) during the periods in which those temporary differences will become deductible.
US Airways reported a loss in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and did not record a tax provision in any 2009 period.
US Airways recorded income tax expense of $3 million in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 related to a reconciliation of the 2007 tax provision to the tax return as filed in the third quarter of 2008.
6. Express Expenses
Expenses associated with affiliate regional airlines operating as US Airways Express are classified as Express expenses on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Express expenses consist of the following (in millions):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
  $ 171     $ 349     $ 438     $ 938  
Salaries and related costs
    6       5       18       16  
Capacity purchases
    425       419       1,261       1,255  
Other rent and landing fees
    24       30       75       74  
Selling expenses
    41       45       115       127  
Other expenses
    22       24       68       75  
 
                       
Express expenses
  $ 689     $ 872     $ 1,975     $ 2,485  
 
                       

 

24


Table of Contents

7. Derivative Instruments
To manage the risk of changes in aviation fuel prices, US Airways periodically enters into derivative contracts comprised of heating oil-based derivative instruments to hedge a portion of its projected jet fuel requirements. Since the third quarter of 2008, US Airways has not entered into any new transactions as part of its fuel hedging program and as of September 30, 2009, there were no remaining outstanding fuel hedging contracts.
US Airways’ fuel hedging instruments did not qualify for hedge accounting. Accordingly, the derivative hedging instruments were recorded as an asset or liability on the balance sheet at fair value and any changes in fair value were recorded in the period of change as gains or losses on fuel hedging instruments, net in operating expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. The following table details US Airways’ loss (gain) on fuel hedging instruments, net (in millions):
                                 
    Three Months     Nine Months  
    Ended September 30,     Ended September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Realized loss (gain)
  $ 50     $ (68 )   $ 382     $ (342 )
Unrealized loss (gain)
    (48 )     488       (375 )     262  
 
                       
Loss (gain) on fuel hedging instruments, net
  $ 2     $ 420     $ 7     $ (80 )
 
                       
The unrealized gains in the 2009 periods were related to the reversal of prior period unrealized losses due to contracts settling in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
8. Investments in Marketable Securities (Noncurrent)
As of September 30, 2009, US Airways held auction rate securities totaling $411 million at par value, which are classified as available for sale securities and noncurrent assets on US Airways’ condensed consolidated balance sheets. Contractual maturities for these auction rate securities range from seven to 43 years, with 62% of US Airways’ portfolio maturing within the next 10 years (2016 — 2017), 10% maturing within the next 20 years (2025), 16% maturing within the next 30 years (2033 — 2036) and 12% maturing thereafter (2039 — 2052). With the liquidity issues experienced in the global credit and capital markets, all of US Airways’ auction rate securities have experienced failed auctions since August 2007. The estimated fair value of these auction rate securities no longer approximates par value. At September 30, 2009, the fair value of US Airways’ auction rate securities was $228 million, a net increase of $14 million from June 30, 2009 and $41 million from December 31, 2008. Refer to Note 9 for discussion on how US Airways determines the fair value of its investments in auction rate securities.
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, US Airways recorded unrealized gains of $17 million and $51 million, respectively, in other comprehensive income related to the increase in fair value of certain of US Airways’ investments in auction rate securities. These unrealized gains were offset by other-than-temporary impairment charges of $3 million and $10 million, respectively, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. These other-than-temporary impairment charges are recorded in other nonoperating expense, net and relate to the decline in fair value of certain of US Airways’ investments in auction rate securities.
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, US Airways recorded $127 million and $140 million, respectively, of other-than-temporary impairment charges in other nonoperating expense, net. These charges in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, included $103 million and $48 million, respectively, of previously recorded unrealized losses in other comprehensive income.
US Airways continues to monitor the market for auction rate securities and consider its impact (if any) on the fair value of its investments. If the current market conditions deteriorate, US Airways may be required to record additional impairment charges in other nonoperating expense, net in future periods.

 

25


Table of Contents

9. Fair Value Measurements
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows (in millions):
                                         
            Quoted Prices in     Significant Other     Significant        
            Active Markets for     Observable     Unobservable        
            Identical Assets     Inputs     Inputs     Valuation  
    Fair Value     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Technique  
At September 30, 2009
                                       
Investments in marketable securities (noncurrent)
  $ 228     $     $     $ 228       (1 )
At December 31, 2008
                                       
Investments in marketable securities (noncurrent)
  $ 187     $     $     $ 187       (1 )
Fuel hedging derivatives
    (375 )           (375 )           (2 )
     
(1)  
US Airways estimated the fair value of its auction rate securities based on the following: (i) the underlying structure of each security; (ii) the present value of future principal and interest payments discounted at rates considered to reflect current market conditions; (iii) consideration of the probabilities of default, passing a future auction, or repurchase at par for each period; and (iv) estimates of the recovery rates in the event of default for each security. These estimated fair values could change significantly based on future market conditions. Refer to Note 8 for further discussion of US Airways’ investments in marketable securities.
 
(2)  
As US Airways’ fuel hedging derivative instruments were not traded on a market exchange, the fair values were determined using valuation models which included assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in the underlying markets. The fair value of fuel hedging derivatives is recorded in accounts payable on the consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 7 for further discussion of US Airways’ fuel hedging derivatives.
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) are as follows (in millions):
         
    Investments in  
    Marketable  
    Securities  
    (Noncurrent)  
Balance at December 31, 2008
  $ 187  
Unrealized gains recorded to other comprehensive income
    51  
Impairment losses included in other nonoperating expense, net
    (10 )
 
     
Balance at September 30, 2009
  $ 228  
 
     
10. Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
US Airways’ other comprehensive loss consists of the following (in millions):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Net loss
  $ (68 )   $ (855 )   $ (94 )   $ (1,639 )
Unrealized gains on available for sale securities
    17             51        
Recognition of previous unrealized losses now deemed other-than-temporary
          103             48  
Other postretirement benefits
    (2 )           (7 )     (2 )
 
                       
Total comprehensive loss
  $ (53 )   $ (752 )   $ (50 )   $ (1,593 )
 
                       
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows (in millions):
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Other postretirement benefits
  $ 71     $ 78  
Accumulated net unrealized gains on available for sale securities
    51        
 
           
Accumulated other comprehensive income
  $ 122     $ 78  
 
           

 

26


Table of Contents

11. Flight 1549
On January 15, 2009, US Airways flight 1549 was involved in an accident in New York that resulted in the aircraft ditching in the Hudson River. The Airbus A320 aircraft was en route to Charlotte from LaGuardia with 150 passengers and a crew of five onboard. All aboard survived and there were no serious injuries. US Airways has insurance coverage for both the aircraft (which is a total loss) as well as costs resulting from the accident, and there are no applicable deductibles.
The aircraft involved in the flight 1549 accident was leased by US Airways. In the first quarter of 2009, US Airways exercised its aircraft substitution right under the lease agreement and transferred title of an owned Airbus A320 to the lessor in substitution for the Airbus A320 aircraft that was involved in the accident. This transferred aircraft will continue to be leased to US Airways under the same terms and conditions of the lease agreement. In connection with this transaction, US Airways extinguished $22 million of debt associated with the previously owned aircraft that was transferred to the lessor.
12. Slot Exchange
In August 2009, US Airways Group and US Airways entered into a mutual asset purchase and sale agreement with Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”). Pursuant to the agreement, US Airways will transfer to Delta certain assets related to flight operations at LaGuardia Airport in New York, including 125 pairs of slots currently used to provide US Airways Express service at LaGuardia. Delta will transfer to US Airways certain assets related to flight operations at Reagan National Airport in Washington, D.C., including 42 pairs of slots, and the authority to serve Sao Paulo, Brazil and Tokyo, Japan. One slot equals one take-off or landing, and each pair of slots equals one roundtrip flight. The agreement is structured as two simultaneous asset sales and is expected to be cash neutral to US Airways. The closing of the transactions under the agreement is subject to certain closing conditions, including approvals from a number of government agencies including the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Federal Aviation Administration and The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.
13. Subsequent Event
US Airways entered into a term sheet to sell 10 of its Embraer 190 aircraft to Republic Airline Inc. (“Republic”). Through October 21, 2009, five of the 10 aircraft sales have been completed and the remaining five are expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2009. US Airways will lease back eight of the 10 aircraft from Republic for periods ranging from one to seven months. Debt outstanding on the 10 Embraer aircraft was $217 million at September 30, 2009. In connection with this transaction, Republic has agreed to assume the full amount of this debt and release US Airways from its obligations associated with the principal due under the debt. Additionally, at September 30, 2009, US Airways had $35 million outstanding under a loan from Republic (the “Republic loan”). The Republic loan was scheduled to be repaid starting in January 2010 and fully repaid in October 2011. In accordance with the term sheet, the full amount outstanding under the Republic loan will be applied to the purchase price of the 10 aircraft. US Airways expects to incur an aggregate loss of approximately $47 million from the sale of the 10 aircraft and write-off of debt discount associated with the Republic loan in the fourth quarter of 2009.

 

27


Table of Contents

Item 2.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Part I, Item 2 of this report should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 7 of US Airways Group, Inc.’s and US Airways, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “2008 Form 10-K”). The information contained herein is not a comprehensive discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, but rather updates disclosures made in the 2008 Form 10-K.
Background
US Airways Group, a Delaware corporation, is a holding company whose primary business activity is the operation of a major network air carrier through its wholly owned subsidiaries US Airways, Piedmont Airlines, Inc. (“Piedmont”), PSA Airlines, Inc. (“PSA”), Material Services Company, Inc. (“MSC”) and Airways Assurance Limited.
We operate the fifth largest airline in the United States as measured by domestic revenue passenger miles (“RPMs”) and available seat miles (“ASMs”). We have primary hubs in Charlotte, Philadelphia and Phoenix, and focus cities in New York, Washington, D.C., Boston and Las Vegas. We offer scheduled passenger service on more than 3,000 flights daily to more than 200 communities in the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East, the Caribbean and Latin America. We also have an established East Coast route network, including the US Airways Shuttle service, with substantial presence at capacity constrained airports including New York’s LaGuardia Airport and the Washington, D.C. area’s Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we had approximately 39 million passengers boarding our mainline flights. As of September 30, 2009, we operated 348 mainline jets and are supported by our regional airline subsidiaries and affiliates operating as US Airways Express either under capacity purchase or prorate agreements, which operate approximately 236 regional jets and 65 turboprops.
U.S. Airline Industry Environment
The airline industry in the United States has been severely impacted in 2009 by the global economic recession. Passenger demand, as reported by the Air Transport Association of America (“ATA”), continued to be down throughout the third quarter of 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. ATA reported U.S. airline passenger revenues were down 21% for the first nine months of 2009 and September 2009 marked the eleventh consecutive month in which industry revenues have fallen.
Business bookings continue to be down sharply as, in response to the economic recession, companies have cut costs by reducing their travel budgets. For those companies whose employees continue to travel for business, airlines are experiencing lower yields as travelers are purchasing the tickets carrying fewer restrictions at lower fares. The contraction of business spending has also significantly impacted cargo demand. ATA reported that cargo, as measured by revenue ton miles, declined 18% year-over-year in the first eight months of 2009. August 2009 marked the thirteenth consecutive month of declining cargo traffic. Leisure travel has held up relatively well, although yields have significantly declined.
Many U.S. airlines continue to report strong load factors through the third quarter of 2009 as capacity cuts have helped offset the decline in demand for air travel. However industry revenues have been adversely affected by severe fare discounting by carriers to stimulate demand. Passenger revenue per available seat mile (“PRASM”) is down significantly in the third quarter of 2009 with substantially greater declines experienced in international markets. International markets continue to be more severely impacted by the economic slowdown than domestic markets. This is a result of capacity expansion overseas during the past several years, which the U.S. industry only intends to reduce by 6% in 2009 as compared to domestic capacity reductions of 8%. Additionally, international traffic has greater reliance on premium business and first class seating and cargo to drive profitability.
U.S. airlines, like other airlines worldwide, remain highly vulnerable to increases in fuel costs. The price of crude oil is down substantially from its record high of $147 per barrel in July 2008, which offsets some of the effects of declining passenger demand resulting from the economic recession. Typically, falling fuel prices would be a natural hedge during times of weak travel demand. However, during the first nine months of 2009, the price of crude oil on a per barrel basis was volatile, ranging from a high of $73.68 to a low of $34.03, and closing at $70.46 on September 30, 2009. This volatility in oil prices has made use of hedging positions by airlines to contain fuel costs either expensive (call options) or risky due to counterparty cash collateral requirements (collars and swaps).
There are some signs that improvement may be on the horizon. For example, monthly year-over-year declines in yield for U.S. airlines, as reported by ATA, reached a high of 21% in June 2009. ATA has since reported improvements in the third quarter, with September 2009 monthly year-over-year declines in yield reported at 18%. However, heading into fall and winter, the seasonally weakest periods of the year for the airline industry, it is difficult to predict the ongoing effects of the global economic recession. Accordingly, the industry is focused on conserving and building cash and matching capacity to demand. During the third quarter of 2009, credit markets were increasingly open to airlines and several U.S. airlines raised cash to enhance liquidity through a number of initiatives such as traditional public stock and debt issuances, asset sales, asset sale and leasebacks, and transactions with affinity credit card issuers.

 

28


Table of Contents

US Airways
Relative to other U.S. legacy or big six hub and spoke carriers, our larger domestic presence means our revenues are less adversely affected by the global economic downturn. The industry has taken much more aggressive corrective capacity reductions domestically and we are less exposed to the sharp declines in passenger and cargo demand in international markets. Our international transatlantic traffic represents approximately 22% of our total ASMs. As a result, our total revenue passenger miles (“RPMs”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased 4.8% on 5.3% lower capacity as compared to the same period in 2008, whereas overall U.S. industry declines in demand in this same period averaged 6% on 6% lower capacity. Cargo represents approximately 1% of our operating revenues.
We have also benefited from our new revenue initiatives implemented in 2008, which have generated $305 million in ancillary revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and are expected to generate in excess of $400 million for fiscal year 2009. Given our shorter length of haul and domestic focus, we believe these initiatives will benefit us more than our competitors. Ancillary revenues include a first and second checked bag service fee, processing fees for travel awards issued through our Dividend Miles frequent traveler program, our new Choice Seats program, increases to the cost of call center/airport ticketing fees and increases to certain preexisting service fees. As a result of these new ancillary revenues, while our mainline and Express PRASM was 10.75 cents in the third quarter of 2009, a 15.4% decline as compared to 12.71 cents in the third quarter of 2008, our total revenue per available seat mile (“RASM”) declined by a lower amount. RASM was 12.08 cents in the third quarter of 2009, as compared to 13.97 cents in the third quarter of 2008, representing only a 13.5% decline. Our ancillary revenues were strengthened in the third quarter of 2009, as we implemented increases to our first and second checked bag fees and added a second checked bag fee on our trans-Atlantic European flights.
During the first nine months of 2009, we continued our capacity reduction, cost control and cash conservation initiatives to further improve our liquidity position.
Capacity and Fleet Reductions
We are continuing to execute our plan of reducing our 2009 total mainline capacity by 4% to 6% and our Express capacity by 4% to 6% from 2008 levels. During the first nine months of 2009, we reduced our mainline and Express capacity by 5.5% and 4.5%, respectively, over the 2008 period. We are achieving our 2009 capacity reductions through the return of aircraft to lessors and reductions in aircraft utilization.
We are also executing strategic transactions to better match capacity to demand. In August 2009, US Airways Group and US Airways entered into a mutual asset purchase and sale agreement with Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”). Pursuant to the agreement, US Airways will transfer to Delta certain assets related to flight operations at LaGuardia Airport in New York, including 125 pairs of slots currently used to provide US Airways Express service at LaGuardia. Delta will transfer to US Airways certain assets related to flight operations at Reagan National Airport in Washington, D.C., including 42 pairs of slots, and the authority to serve Sao Paulo, Brazil and Tokyo, Japan. One slot equals one take-off or landing, and each pair of slots equals one roundtrip flight. The agreement is structured as two simultaneous asset sales and is expected to be cash neutral to US Airways. The closing of the transactions under the agreement is subject to certain closing conditions, including approvals from a number of government agencies including the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Federal Aviation Administration and The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. If approved, this transaction will significantly increase our capacity in the Washington, D.C. market.
Cost Control
We remain committed to maintaining a low cost structure, which we believe is necessary in an industry whose economic prospects are heavily dependent upon two variables we cannot control: the health of the economy and the price of fuel. As a result of reduced flying discussed above, we have reduced non-essential headcount through voluntary and involuntary furlough programs as well as attrition. In connection with our capacity reductions described above, we have eliminated approximately 3,200 positions across the system including 300 pilots, 800 flight attendants, 1,400 airport employees and 700 non-union administrative management and staff since the third quarter of 2008. Most importantly, we control costs by continuing to run a good operation. See the “Customer Service” section below for further discussion. Additionally, in the current industry environment, our cost focus has been extended to cash conservation, and we intend to minimize or defer discretionary expenditures.

 

29


Table of Contents

Liquidity
As of September 30, 2009, our cash, cash equivalents, investments in marketable securities and restricted cash were $2 billion, of which $530 million was restricted. Our investments in marketable securities included $228 million of auction rate securities that are classified as noncurrent assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further discussion of our investments in auction rate securities.
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (In millions)  
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments in marketable securities
  $ 1,242     $ 1,054  
Short and long-term restricted cash
    530       726  
Long-term investments in marketable securities
    228       187  
 
           
Total cash, cash equivalents, investments in marketable securities and restricted cash
  $ 2,000     $ 1,967  
 
           
We have taken several actions in 2009 to strengthen our liquidity position. In the third quarter of 2009, we completed an underwritten public offering of common stock which generated net proceeds of $137 million. During the first half of 2009, we completed a series of financing transactions generating approximately $350 million in net proceeds, including common stock and convertible note offerings, which generated net proceeds of $234 million, an additional loan under a spare parts loan agreement, a loan secured by certain airport landing slots and an unsecured financing with one of our third party Express carriers.
All of our remaining A320 family aircraft scheduled for delivery in 2009 have backstop financing available through the manufacturer and we have secured financing for the remaining two A330-200 deliveries scheduled for delivery in 2009. Due to the uncertainty of the ongoing effects of the economic recession, we are pursuing additional sources of liquidity as well as strategies to preserve liquidity to strengthen our position.
Current Financial Results and Outlook
US Airways Group’s net loss for the third quarter of 2009 was $80 million, or a loss of $0.60 per share, as compared to a net loss of $866 million, or $8.46 per share, in the third quarter of 2008.
The average mainline and Express price per gallon of fuel decreased 49.3% to $1.90 in the third quarter of 2009 from $3.75 in the third quarter of 2008. As a result, our mainline and Express fuel expense for the third quarter of 2009 was $754 million or 51.7% lower than the 2008 period on 3.6% lower capacity. Since the third quarter of 2008, we have not entered into any new transactions as part of our fuel hedging program and as of September 30, 2009, there were no remaining outstanding fuel hedging contracts. Net losses associated with fuel hedging transactions were $2 million in the third quarter of 2009, a decline of $418 million from the 2008 period. The third quarter of 2009 included $50 million of net realized losses, offset by $48 million of net unrealized gains. In mark-to-market accounting, the unrealized losses recognized in prior periods are reversed as hedge transactions are settled in the current period.
While fuel costs decreased significantly, the weak demand environment caused by the global economic recession resulted in a $549 million or 18.5% decrease in mainline and Express passenger revenues in the third quarter of 2009 on lower capacity as compared to the 2008 period. Our mainline and Express PRASM was 10.75 cents in the third quarter of 2009, a 15.4% decline as compared to 12.71 cents in the third quarter of 2008. Mainline and Express yield was 13.01 cents in the third quarter of 2009 as compared to 15.45 cents in the third quarter of 2008, a 15.8% decline. As discussed above, our new ancillary revenues introduced during 2008 mitigated some of the impact of declining demand. While PRASM declined 15.4% as compared to the third quarter of 2008, our total RASM decline was only 13.5%, decreasing from 13.97 cents in the third quarter of 2008 to 12.08 cents in the third quarter of 2009.
While the magnitude of the ongoing impact of the weakened economic environment remains uncertain, we believe that our greater presence in U.S. domestic markets as well as our actions to increase revenue, reduce costs and strengthen and preserve liquidity have better positioned us relative to other U.S. legacy or big six hub and spoke carriers for the difficult global economy.

 

30


Table of Contents

Customer Service
We are committed to running a successful airline. One of the important ways we do this is by taking care of our customers. We believe that our focus on excellent customer service in every aspect of our operations, including personnel, flight equipment, in-flight and ancillary amenities, on-time performance, flight completion ratios and baggage handling, will strengthen customer loyalty and attract new customers.
Through August 2009, we ranked first in on-time performance among the big six hub and spoke carriers as measured by the Department of Transportation’s (“DOT”) Air Travel Consumer Report. This follows our first place ranking for the full year 2008 among these same carriers. Our mishandled baggage ratio as reported by the DOT has significantly improved each month during the first nine months of 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. For the months of July and August of 2009, our ratio of mishandled bags ranked second and third, respectively, as measured against the 10 largest airlines according to the DOT monthly Air Travel Consumer Report. Additionally, our mishandled baggage rate of 2.14 per 1,000 passengers reported in September 2009 is our lowest ratio since January 2002. The combination of continued strong on-time performance and fewer mishandled bags contributed to 49.8% fewer reported customer complaints to the DOT in the third quarter of 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008.
We reported the following combined operating statistics to the DOT for mainline operations for the third quarter of 2009 and 2008:
                                                                         
    2009     2008     Percent Change 2009-2008  
    July     August     September (e)     July     August     September     July     August     September  
On-time performance (a)
    80.6       81.4       87.9       78.3       80.8       84.1       2.9       0.7       4.5  
Completion factor (b)
    98.9       99.0       99.5       98.3       98.2       98.8       0.6       0.8       0.7  
Mishandled baggage (c)
    2.75       2.90       2.14       4.22       4.09       3.09       (34.8 )     (29.1 )     (30.7 )
Customer complaints (d)
    1.18       1.10       0.99       2.16       2.45       1.90       (45.4 )     (55.1 )     (47.9 )
 
     
(a)  
Percentage of reported flight operations arriving on time as defined by the DOT.
 
(b)  
Percentage of scheduled flight operations completed.
 
(c)  
Rate of mishandled baggage reports per 1,000 passengers.
 
(d)  
Rate of customer complaints filed with the DOT per 100,000 passengers.
 
(e)  
September 2009 operating statistics are preliminary as the DOT has not issued its September 2009 Air Travel Consumer Report as of the date of this filing.

 

31


Table of Contents

US Airways Group’s Results of Operations
In the three months ended September 30, 2009, we realized operating income of $6 million and a loss before income taxes of $80 million. The weak demand environment caused by the global economic recession drove a $542 million or 16.6% decrease in total revenues on 3.6% lower capacity as compared to the 2008 period. The declines in revenues were offset by lower fuel expense as our mainline and Express fuel expense for the third quarter of 2009 was $754 million or 51.7% lower than the 2008 period on 3.6% lower capacity. The average mainline and Express price per gallon of fuel decreased 49.3% to $1.90 in the third quarter of 2009 from $3.75 in the third quarter of 2008. Our third quarter 2009 results were also impacted by recognition of the following items:
   
$50 million of net realized losses on settled fuel hedging instruments, offset by $48 million of net unrealized gains resulting from the application of mark-to-market accounting for changes in the fair value of fuel hedging instruments. In mark-to-market accounting, the unrealized losses recognized in prior periods are reversed as hedge transactions are settled in the current period. We were required to use mark-to-market accounting as our fuel hedging instruments did not meet the requirements for hedge accounting. If these instruments had qualified for hedge accounting treatment, any unrealized gains or losses would have been recorded in other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity;
   
$15 million of net special charges consisting of $10 million in aircraft costs as a result of our previously announced capacity reductions and $5 million in severance and other charges; and
   
$3 million in other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charges included in nonoperating expense, net for our investments in auction rate securities.
In the three months ended September 30, 2008, we realized an operating loss of $689 million and a loss before income taxes of $863 million. The third quarter of 2008 loss was driven by an average price per gallon of fuel of $3.75 for mainline and Express operations. Our third quarter 2008 results were also impacted by recognition of the following items:
   
$488 million of net unrealized losses resulting from the application of mark-to-market accounting for changes in the fair value of fuel hedging instruments, offset by $68 million of net realized gains on settled fuel hedging instruments;
   
$8 million of net special charges for severance costs as a result of our capacity reductions; and
   
$127 million in other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charges included in nonoperating expense, net for our investments in auction rate securities.
In the first nine months of 2009, we realized operating income of $103 million and a loss before income taxes of $125 million. The weak demand environment caused by the global economic recession drove a $1.53 billion or 16.3% decrease in total revenues on 5.3% lower capacity as compared to the 2008 period. The declines in revenues were offset by lower fuel expense as our mainline and Express fuel expense for the first nine months of 2009 was $2.17 billion or 54.7% lower than the 2008 period on 5.3% lower capacity. The average mainline and Express price per gallon of fuel decreased 51.5% to $1.67 in the first nine months of 2009 from $3.44 in the 2008 period. Our results for the first nine months of 2009 were also impacted by recognition of the following items:
   
$382 million of net realized losses on settled fuel hedging instruments, offset by $375 million of net unrealized gains resulting from the application of mark-to-market accounting for changes in the fair value of fuel hedging instruments;
   
$22 million of net special charges consisting of $16 million in aircraft costs as a result of our previously announced capacity reductions and $6 million in severance and other charges; and
   
$10 million in other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charges for our investments in auction rate securities as well as a $2 million non-cash asset impairment charge, all included in nonoperating expense, net.
In the first nine months of 2008, we realized an operating loss of $1.42 billion and a loss before income taxes of $1.67 billion. The loss in the first nine months of 2008 was driven by an average price per gallon of fuel of $3.44 for mainline and Express operations as well as a $622 million non-cash charge to write off all the goodwill created by the merger of US Airways Group and America West Holdings in September 2005. Our results for the first nine months of 2008 were also impacted by recognition of the following items:
   
$342 million of net realized gains on settled fuel hedging instruments, offset by $262 million of net unrealized losses resulting from the application of mark-to-market accounting for changes in the fair value of fuel hedging instruments;

 

32


Table of Contents

   
$67 million of net special charges consisting of $35 million of merger related transition expenses, $18 million in non-cash charges related to the decline in the fair value of certain spare parts associated with our Boeing 737 aircraft fleet, and as a result of our capacity reductions, $8 million in severance charges and $6 million in aircraft costs; and
   
$140 million in other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charges for our investments in auction rate securities, a $2 million write off of debt discount and debt issuance costs in connection with the refinancing of certain aircraft equipment notes, offset by $8 million in gains on forgiveness of debt, all included in nonoperating expense, net.
At December 31, 2008, we had approximately $1.4 billion of gross net operating loss carryforwards (“NOL”) to reduce future federal taxable income, substantially all of which is available to reduce federal taxable income in the calendar year 2009. The NOL expires during the years 2022 through 2028. Our deferred tax asset, which included $1.3 billion of the NOL discussed above, has been subject to a full valuation allowance. We also had approximately $77 million of tax-effected state NOL at December 31, 2008.
We reported a loss in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and did not record a tax provision in any 2009 period.
We recorded income tax expense of $3 million in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 related to a reconciliation of the 2007 tax provision to the tax return as filed in the third quarter of 2008.

 

33


Table of Contents

The table below sets forth our selected mainline and Express operating data:
                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Percent     Nine Months Ended     Percent  
    September 30,     Change     September 30,     Change  
    2009     2008     2009-2008     2009     2008     2009-2008  
Mainline
                                               
Revenue passenger miles (millions) (a)
    15,719       16,270       (3.4 )     44,553       46,952       (5.1 )
Available seat miles (millions) (b)
    18,718       19,402       (3.5 )     54,007       57,124       (5.5 )
Passenger load factor (percent) (c)
    84.0       83.9       0.1  pts     82.5       82.2       0.3  pts
Yield (cents) (d)
    11.18       13.50       (17.2 )     11.43       13.56       (15.7 )
Passenger revenue per available seat mile (cents) (e)
    9.39       11.32       (17.1 )     9.43       11.14       (15.4 )
Operating cost per available seat mile (cents) (f)
    11.00       16.01       (31.3 )     10.82       14.67       (26.2 )
Passenger enplanements (thousands) (g)
    13,049       14,068       (7.2 )     38,899       42,014       (7.4 )
Departures (thousands)
    115       125       (7.5 )     350       378       (7.2 )
Aircraft at end of period
    348       358       (2.8 )     348       358       (2.8 )
Block hours (thousands) (h)
    313       332       (5.6 )     934       996       (6.2 )
Average stage length (miles) (i)
    1,013       986       2.7       977       965       1.3  
Average passenger journey (miles) (j)
    1,766       1,645       7.4       1,650       1,583       4.3  
Fuel consumption (gallons in millions)
    282       297       (5.0 )     818       882       (7.2 )
Average aircraft fuel price including related taxes (dollars per gallon)
    1.89       3.73       (49.4 )     1.65       3.42       (51.7 )
Full time equivalent employees at end of period
    31,592       32,779       (3.6 )     31,592       32,779       (3.6 )
Express (k)
                                               
Revenue passenger miles (millions) (a)
    2,873       2,942       (2.4 )     8,055       8,333       (3.3 )
Available seat miles (millions) (b)
    3,785       3,943       (4.0 )     10,917       11,434       (4.5 )
Passenger load factor (percent) (c)
    75.9       74.6       1.3  pts     73.8       72.9       0.9  pts
Yield (cents) (d)
    23.06       26.20       (12.0 )     23.04       26.76       (13.9 )
Passenger revenue per available seat mile (cents) (e)
    17.50       19.55       (10.5 )     17.00       19.50       (12.8 )
Operating cost per available seat mile (cents) (f)
    17.27       21.40       (19.3 )     17.24       20.98       (17.8 )
Passenger enplanements (thousands) (g)
    7,235       7,117       1.7       20,264       20,382       (0.6 )
Aircraft at end of period
    288       296       (2.7 )     288       296       (2.7 )
Fuel consumption (gallons in millions)
    89       92       (3.6 )     256       269       (4.7 )
Average aircraft fuel price including related taxes (dollars per gallon)
    1.93       3.80       (49.3 )     1.71       3.49       (51.0 )
Total Mainline and Express
                                               
Revenue passenger miles (millions) (a)
    18,592       19,212       (3.2 )     52,608       55,285       (4.8 )
Available seat miles (millions) (b)
    22,503       23,345       (3.6 )     64,924       68,558       (5.3 )
Passenger load factor (percent) (c)
    82.6       82.3       0.3  pts     81.0       80.6       0.4  pts
Yield (cents) (d)
    13.01       15.45       (15.8 )     13.21       15.55       (15.0 )
Passenger revenue per available seat mile (cents) (e)
    10.75       12.71       (15.4 )     10.70       12.54       (14.6 )
Total revenue per available seat mile (cents) (l)
    12.08       13.97       (13.5 )     12.06       13.65       (11.6 )
Passenger enplanements (thousands) (g)
    20,284       21,185       (4.2 )     59,163       62,396       (5.2 )
Aircraft at end of period
    636       654       (2.8 )     636       654       (2.8 )
Fuel consumption (gallons in millions)
    371       389       (4.7 )     1,074       1,151       (6.6 )
Average aircraft fuel price including related taxes (dollars per gallon)
    1.90       3.75       (49.3 )     1.67       3.44       (51.5 )
 
     
(a)  
Revenue passenger mile (“RPM”) — A basic measure of sales volume. A RPM represents one passenger flown one mile.
 
(b)  
Available seat mile (“ASM”) — A basic measure of production. An ASM represents one seat flown one mile.
 
(c)  
Passenger load factor — The percentage of available seats that are filled with revenue passengers.
 
(d)  
Yield — A measure of airline revenue derived by dividing passenger revenue by revenue passenger miles and expressed in cents per mile.
 
(e)  
Passenger revenue per available seat mile (“PRASM”) — Passenger revenues divided by available seat miles.
 
(f)  
Operating cost per available seat mile (“CASM”) — Operating expenses divided by available seat miles.
 
(g)  
Passenger enplanements — The number of passengers on board an aircraft including local, connecting and through passengers.

 

34


Table of Contents

     
(h)  
Block hours — The hours measured from the moment an aircraft first moves under its own power, including taxi time, for the purposes of flight until the aircraft is docked at the next point of landing and its power is shut down.
 
(i)  
Average stage length — The average of the distances flown on each segment of every route.
 
(j)  
Average passenger journey — The average one-way trip measured in miles for one passenger origination.
 
(k)  
Express statistics include Piedmont and PSA, as well as operating and financial results from capacity purchase agreements with Air Wisconsin Airlines Corporation, Republic Airways, Mesa Airlines, Inc. and Chautauqua Airlines, Inc.
 
(l)  
Total revenue per available seat mile (“RASM”) — Total revenues divided by total mainline and Express available seat miles.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
Compared with the
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
Operating Revenues:
                         
                    Percent  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In millions)        
Operating revenues:
                       
Mainline passenger
  $ 1,757     $ 2,197       (20.0 )
Express passenger
    662       771       (14.1 )
Cargo
    23       37       (36.5 )
Other
    277       256       8.0  
 
                   
Total operating revenues
  $ 2,719     $ 3,261       (16.6 )
 
                   
Total operating revenues in the third quarter of 2009 were $2.72 billion as compared to $3.26 billion in the 2008 period, a decline of $542 million or 16.6%. The weak demand environment in 2009 drove a $549 million or 18.5% decrease in mainline and Express passenger revenues on 3.6% lower capacity as compared to the 2008 period. The increase in ancillary revenues resulting from our new revenue initiatives implemented in the latter part of 2008 offset a portion of this decline. As a result, on a period over period basis, total RASM decreased by only 13.5% as compared to mainline and Express PRASM, which decreased by 15.4%. Significant changes in the components of operating revenues are as follows:
   
Mainline passenger revenues were $1.76 billion in the third quarter of 2009 as compared to $2.2 billion for the 2008 period. Mainline RPMs decreased 3.4% as mainline capacity, as measured by ASMs, decreased 3.5%, resulting in a 0.1 point increase in load factor to 84%. Mainline passenger yield decreased 17.2% to 11.18 cents in the third quarter of 2009 from 13.5 cents in the 2008 period. Mainline PRASM decreased 17.1% to 9.39 cents in the third quarter of 2009 from 11.32 cents in the 2008 period. Mainline yield and PRASM decreased in the third quarter of 2009 due principally to the decline in passenger demand and weak pricing environment driven by the global economic recession.
   
Express passenger revenues were $662 million in the third quarter of 2009, a decrease of $109 million from the 2008 period. Express RPMs decreased by 2.4% as Express capacity, as measured by ASMs, decreased 4%, resulting in a 1.3 point increase in load factor to 75.9%. Express passenger yield decreased by 12% to 23.06 cents in the third quarter of 2009 from 26.2 cents in the 2008 period. Express PRASM decreased 10.5% to 17.5 cents in the third quarter of 2009 from 19.55 cents in the 2008 period. The decreases in Express yield and PRASM were the result of the same passenger demand declines and weak pricing environment discussed in mainline passenger revenues above.
   
Cargo revenues were $23 million in the third quarter of 2009, a decrease of $14 million or 36.5% from the 2008 period. The decrease in cargo revenues was driven by declines in freight volumes as a result of the contraction of business spending in the current economic environment as well as a decrease in fuel surcharges in 2009 as compared to the 2008 period.
   
Other revenues were $277 million in the third quarter of 2009, an increase of $21 million or 8% from the 2008 period primarily due to an increase of $46 million generated by our first checked bag fees, which were implemented in the third quarter of 2008. This increase was offset in part by declines in fuel sales to our pro-rate carriers through our MSC subsidiary driven by lower fuel prices in the 2009 period. A decline in the volume of passenger ticketing change fees also contributed to this decrease.

 

35


Table of Contents

Operating Expenses:
                         
                    Percent  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In millions)        
Operating expenses:
                       
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
  $ 534     $ 1,110       (51.9 )
Loss (gain) on fuel hedging instruments, net:
                       
Realized
    50       (68 )   nm  
Unrealized
    (48 )     488     nm  
Salaries and related costs
    553       567       (2.5 )
Aircraft rent
    171       183       (6.4 )
Aircraft maintenance
    174       188       (7.5 )
Other rent and landing fees
    148       137       8.2  
Selling expenses
    99       120       (17.3 )
Special items, net
    15       8       81.6  
Depreciation and amortization
    63       52       20.2  
Other
    300       321       (6.4 )
 
                   
Total mainline operating expenses
    2,059       3,106       (33.7 )
Express expenses:
                       
Fuel
    171       349       (51.1 )
Other
    483       495       (2.3 )
 
                   
Total Express expenses
    654       844       (22.5 )
 
                   
Total operating expenses
  $ 2,713     $ 3,950       (31.3 )
 
                   
Total operating expenses were $2.71 billion in the third quarter of 2009, a decrease of $1.24 billion or 31.3% compared to the 2008 period. Mainline operating expenses were $2.06 billion in the third quarter of 2009, a decrease of $1.05 billion or 33.7% from the 2008 period, while ASMs decreased 3.5%.
Mainline CASM decreased 31.3% to 11 cents in the third quarter of 2009 from 16.01 cents in the 2008 period. The period over period decrease in mainline CASM was driven principally by decreases in fuel costs ($576 million or 2.87 cents per ASM) as well as a decrease in the net losses on fuel hedging instruments ($418 million or 2.16 cents per ASM) in the 2009 period compared to the 2008 period.
The 2009 period included $15 million of net special charges consisting of $10 million in aircraft costs as a result of our previously announced capacity reductions and $5 million in severance and other charges. This compares to net special charges of $8 million in the 2008 period for severance costs as a result of our capacity reductions.
The table below sets forth the major components of our mainline CASM for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
                         
                    Percent  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In cents)        
Mainline CASM:
                       
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
    2.85       5.72       (50.2 )
Loss on fuel hedging instruments, net
    0.01       2.17       (99.5 )
Salaries and related costs
    2.96       2.92       1.1  
Aircraft rent
    0.91       0.94       (2.9 )
Aircraft maintenance
    0.93       0.97       (4.1 )
Other rent and landing fees
    0.79       0.71       12.1  
Selling expenses
    0.53       0.62       (14.2 )
Special items, net
    0.08       0.04       88.2  
Depreciation and amortization
    0.34       0.27       24.6  
Other
    1.60       1.65       (3.0 )
 
                   
Total mainline CASM
    11.00       16.01       (31.3 )
 
                   

 

36


Table of Contents

Significant changes in the components of mainline operating expense per ASM are as follows:
   
Aircraft fuel and related taxes per ASM decreased 50.2% primarily due to a 49.4% decrease in the average price per gallon of fuel to $1.89 in the third quarter of 2009 from $3.73 in the 2008 period. A 5% decrease in gallons of fuel consumed in the 2009 period on 3.5% lower capacity also contributed to the decrease.
   
Loss on fuel hedging instruments, net per ASM was a loss of 0.01 cent in the third quarter of 2009 as compared to a loss of 2.17 cents in the third quarter of 2008. Since the third quarter of 2008, we have not entered into any new transactions as part of our fuel hedging program and as of September 30, 2009, there were no remaining outstanding fuel hedging contracts. The net loss in the 2009 period included realized losses of $50 million on settled fuel hedging instruments, offset by net unrealized gains of $48 million. The unrealized gains are the result of the application of mark-to-market accounting in which unrealized losses recognized in prior periods are reversed as hedge transactions are settled in the current period. We recognized net losses from our fuel hedging program in the third quarter of 2008 due to the significant decline in the price of oil in September 2008, which generated unrealized losses on certain open fuel hedging instruments as the price of heating oil fell below the lower limit of those collar transactions.
   
Other rent and landing fees per ASM increased 12.1% despite a decrease in ASMs of 3.5% over the 2008 period due to rate increases in landing fees and space rent at certain airport locations as well as the fixed nature of space rent.
   
Selling expenses per ASM decreased 14.2% due to lower credit card fees, booking fees and commissions paid as a result of a decline in the number and value of tickets sold resulting from the weakened demand and pricing caused by the economic recession.
   
Depreciation and amortization expense per ASM increased 24.6% due to an increase in the average number of owned aircraft to 75 in the 2009 period from 57 in the 2008 period, which increased depreciation expense. The increase in the average number of owned aircraft included 13 Airbus 320 family, three Embraer 190 and two Airbus 330 aircraft.
Total Express expenses decreased $190 million or 22.5% in the third quarter of 2009 to $654 million from $844 million in the 2008 period. The period over period decrease was primarily driven by decreases in fuel costs. Express fuel costs decreased $178 million as the average fuel price per gallon decreased 49.3% from $3.80 in the 2008 period to $1.93 in the 2009 period. In addition, gallons of fuel consumed in 2009 decreased 3.6% on 4% lower capacity. Other Express expenses decreased $12 million or 2.3% despite a 4% decrease in Express ASMs due to certain fixed costs associated with our capacity purchase agreements as well as certain contractual rate increases with these carriers.
Nonoperating Income (Expense):
                         
                    Percent  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In millions)        
Nonoperating income (expense):
                       
Interest income
  $ 5     $ 19       (75.1 )
Interest expense, net
    (81 )     (58 )     40.3  
Other, net
    (10 )     (135 )     (93.0 )
 
                   
Total nonoperating expense, net
  $ (86 )   $ (174 )     (50.5 )
 
                   
Net nonoperating expense was $86 million in the third quarter of 2009 as compared to $174 million in the 2008 period. Interest income decreased $14 million in the 2009 period due to lower average investment balances and lower rates of return. Interest expense, net increased $23 million due to an increase in the average debt balance outstanding primarily as a result of financing transactions completed in the fourth quarter of 2008 and first nine months of 2009, partially offset by reductions in average interest rates associated with variable rate debt as compared to the 2008 period.
Other nonoperating expense, net in the 2009 period included a $6 million loss on the sale of certain aircraft equipment and $3 million in other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charges for our investments in auction rate securities. Other nonoperating expense, net in the 2008 period included $127 million in other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charges for our investments in auction rate securities as well as $8 million in foreign currency losses. The impairment charges on auction rate securities are discussed in more detail under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

 

37


Table of Contents

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Compared with the
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Operating Revenues:
                         
                    Percent  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In millions)        
Operating revenues:
                       
Mainline passenger
  $ 5,092     $ 6,364       (20.0 )
Express passenger
    1,856       2,230       (16.8 )
Cargo
    67       111       (39.3 )
Other
    817       652       25.3  
 
                   
Total operating revenues
  $ 7,832     $ 9,357       (16.3 )
 
                   
Total operating revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $7.83 billion as compared to $9.36 billion in the 2008 period, a decline of $1.53 billion or 16.3%. The weak demand environment in 2009 drove a $1.65 billion or 19.2% decrease in mainline and Express passenger revenues on 5.3% lower capacity as compared to the 2008 period. The increase in ancillary revenues resulting from our new revenue initiatives implemented in the latter part of 2008 offset a portion of this decline. As a result, on a period over period basis, total RASM decreased only 11.6% as compared to mainline and Express PRASM, which decreased by 14.6%. Significant changes in the components of operating revenues are as follows:
   
Mainline passenger revenues were $5.09 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $6.36 billion for the 2008 period. Mainline RPMs decreased 5.1% as mainline capacity, as measured by ASMs, decreased 5.5%, resulting in a 0.3 point increase in load factor to 82.5%. Mainline passenger yield decreased 15.7% to 11.43 cents in the first nine months of 2009 from 13.56 cents in the 2008 period. Mainline PRASM decreased 15.4% to 9.43 cents in the first nine months of 2009 from 11.14 cents in the 2008 period. Mainline yield and PRASM decreased in the first nine months of 2009 due principally to the decline in passenger demand and weak pricing environment driven by the global economic recession.
   
Express passenger revenues were $1.86 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $374 million from the 2008 period. Express RPMs decreased by 3.3% as Express capacity, as measured by ASMs, decreased 4.5%, resulting in a 0.9 point increase in load factor to 73.8%. Express passenger yield decreased by 13.9% to 23.04 cents in the first nine months of 2009 from 26.76 cents in the 2008 period. Express PRASM decreased 12.8% to 17 cents in the first nine months of 2009 from 19.5 cents in the 2008 period. The decreases in Express yield and PRASM were the result of the same passenger demand declines and weak pricing environment discussed in mainline passenger revenues above.
   
Cargo revenues were $67 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $44 million or 39.3% from the 2008 period. The decrease in cargo revenues was driven by declines in freight volumes as a result of the contraction of business spending in the current economic environment as well as a decrease in fuel surcharges in 2009 as compared to the 2008 period.
   
Other revenues were $817 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $165 million or 25.3% from the 2008 period. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $221 million generated by our first and second checked bag fees, which were implemented in the second and third quarters of 2008. This increase was offset in part by declines in fuel sales to our pro-rate carriers through our MSC subsidiary driven by lower fuel prices in the 2009 period. A decline in the volume of passenger ticketing change fees also contributed to this decrease.

 

38


Table of Contents

Operating Expenses:
                         
                    Percent  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In millions)        
Operating expenses:
                       
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
  $ 1,353     $ 3,018       (55.2 )
Loss (gain) on fuel hedging instruments, net:
                       
Realized
    382       (342 )   nm  
Unrealized
    (375 )     262     nm  
Salaries and related costs
    1,653       1,701       (2.8 )
Aircraft rent
    523       544       (3.9 )
Aircraft maintenance
    532       601       (11.4 )
Other rent and landing fees
    422       424       (0.6 )
Selling expenses
    291       340       (14.5 )
Special items, net
    22       67       (67.7 )
Depreciation and amortization
    185       159       16.0  
Goodwill impairment
          622     nm  
Other
    859       982       (12.5 )
 
                   
Total mainline operating expenses
    5,847       8,378       (30.2 )
Express expenses:
                       
Fuel
    438       938       (53.3 )
Other
    1,444       1,462       (1.2 )
 
                   
Total Express expenses
    1,882       2,400       (21.6 )
 
                   
Total operating expenses
  $ 7,729     $ 10,778       (28.3 )
 
                   
Total operating expenses were $7.73 billion in the first nine months of 2009, a decrease of $3.05 billion or 28.3% compared to the 2008 period. Mainline operating expenses were $5.85 billion in the first nine months of 2009, a decrease of $2.53 billion or 30.2% from the 2008 period, while ASMs decreased 5.5%.
Mainline CASM decreased 26.2% to 10.82 cents in the first nine months of 2009 from 14.67 cents in the 2008 period. The period over period decrease in mainline CASM was driven principally by decreases in fuel costs ($1.67 billion or 2.78 cents per ASM) in the 2009 period. The 2008 period included a $622 million non-cash charge to write off all of the goodwill created by the merger of US Airways Group and America West Holdings in September 2005, which contributed 1.09 cents to our mainline CASM.
The 2009 period included $22 million of net special charges consisting of $16 million in aircraft costs as a result of our previously announced capacity reductions and $6 million in severance and other charges. This compares to net special charges of $67 million in the 2008 period, consisting of $35 million of merger related transition expenses, $18 million in non-cash charges related to the decline in the fair value of certain spare parts associated with our Boeing 737 aircraft fleet, and as a result of our capacity reductions, $8 million in severance charges and $6 million in aircraft costs.
The table below sets forth the major components of our mainline CASM for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
                         
                    Percent  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In cents)        
Mainline CASM:
                       
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
    2.50       5.28       (52.6 )
Loss (gain) on fuel hedging instruments, net
    0.01       (0.14 )   nm  
Salaries and related costs
    3.06       2.98       2.8  
Aircraft rent
    0.97       0.95       1.6  
Aircraft maintenance
    0.99       1.05       (6.3 )
Other rent and landing fees
    0.78       0.74       5.1  
Selling expenses
    0.54       0.60       (9.6 )
Special items, net
    0.04       0.12       (65.9 )
Depreciation and amortization
    0.34       0.28       22.7  
Goodwill impairment
          1.09     nm  
Other
    1.59       1.72       (7.5 )
 
                   
Total mainline CASM
    10.82       14.67       (26.2 )
 
                   

 

39


Table of Contents

Significant changes in the components of mainline operating expense per ASM are as follows:
   
Aircraft fuel and related taxes per ASM decreased 52.6% primarily due to a 51.7% decrease in the average price per gallon of fuel to $1.65 in the first nine months of 2009 from $3.42 in the 2008 period. A 7.2% decrease in gallons of fuel consumed in the 2009 period on 5.5% lower capacity also contributed to the decrease.
   
Loss (gain) on fuel hedging instruments, net per ASM fluctuated to a loss of 0.01 cent in the first nine months of 2009 from a gain of 0.14 cents in the first nine months of 2008. Since the third quarter of 2008, we have not entered into any new transactions as part of our fuel hedging program and as of September 30, 2009, there were no remaining outstanding fuel hedging contracts. The net loss in the 2009 period included realized losses of $382 million on settled fuel hedging instruments, offset by $375 million of net unrealized gains. The unrealized gains are the result of the application of mark-to-market accounting in which unrealized losses recognized in prior periods are reversed as hedge transactions are settled in the current period. We recognized net gains from our fuel hedging program in the first nine months of 2008 as the price of heating oil exceeded the upper limit on certain of our collar transactions.
   
Aircraft maintenance expense per ASM decreased 6.3% due principally to decreases in the number of engine and landing gear overhauls performed in the 2009 period as compared to the 2008 period as a result of the timing of maintenance cycles.
   
Other rent and landing fees per ASM increased 5.1% despite a decrease in ASMs of 5.5% over the 2008 period due to the fixed nature of space rent as well as rate increases in landing fees and space rent at certain airport locations.
   
Selling expenses per ASM decreased 9.6% due to lower credit card fees, booking fees and commissions paid as a result of a decline in the number and value of tickets sold resulting from the weakened demand and pricing caused by the economic recession.
   
Depreciation and amortization expense per ASM increased 22.7% due to an increase in the average number of owned aircraft to 69 in the 2009 period from 51 in the 2008 period, which increased depreciation expense. The increase in the average number of owned aircraft included nine Airbus 320 family, eight Embraer 190 and one Airbus 330 aircraft.
   
Other expense per ASM decreased 7.5% due to a decrease in the incremental cost of travel awards associated with our frequent traveler program, principally as a result of lower fuel costs and the decline in the cost of fuel associated with sales to pro-rate carriers through MSC driven by lower fuel prices in the 2009 period. Our continued focus on overall cost control also contributed to the decrease.
Total Express expenses decreased $518 million or 21.6% in the first nine months of 2009 to $1.88 billion from $2.4 billion in the 2008 period. The period over period decrease was primarily driven by decreases in fuel costs. Express fuel costs decreased $500 million as the average fuel price per gallon decreased 51% from $3.49 in the first nine months of 2008 to $1.71 in the 2009 period. In addition, gallons of fuel consumed in 2009 decreased 4.7% on 4.5% lower capacity. Other Express expenses decreased $18 million or 1.2% despite a 4.5% decrease in Express ASMs due to certain fixed costs associated with our capacity purchase agreements as well as certain contractual rate increases with these carriers.
Nonoperating Income (Expense):
                         
                    Percent  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In millions)        
Nonoperating income (expense):
                       
Interest income
  $ 17     $ 69       (74.6 )
Interest expense, net
    (229 )     (176 )     29.8  
Other, net
    (16 )     (140 )     (88.2 )
 
                   
Total nonoperating expense, net
  $ (228 )   $ (247 )     (7.8 )
 
                   

 

40


Table of Contents

Net nonoperating expense was $228 million in the first nine months of 2009 as compared to $247 million in the 2008 period. Interest income decreased $52 million in the 2009 period due to lower average investment balances and lower rates of return. Interest expense, net increased $53 million due to an increase in the average debt balance outstanding primarily as a result of financing transactions completed in the fourth quarter of 2008 and first nine months of 2009, partially offset by reductions in average interest rates associated with variable rate debt as compared to the 2008 period.
Other nonoperating expense, net in the 2009 period included $10 million in other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charges for our investments in auction rate securities, a $6 million loss on the sale of certain aircraft equipment and a $2 million non-cash asset impairment charge, offset by $2 million in foreign currency gains. Other nonoperating expense, net in the 2008 period included $140 million in other- than-temporary non-cash impairment charges for our investments in auction rate securities, $6 million in foreign currency losses, and a $2 million write off of debt discount and debt issuance costs in connection with the refinancing of certain aircraft equipment notes, offset by $8 million in gains on forgiveness of debt. The impairment charges on auction rate securities are discussed in more detail under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

 

41


Table of Contents

US Airways’ Results of Operations
In the three months ended September 30, 2009, US Airways realized operating income of $1 million and a loss before income taxes of $68 million. The weak demand environment caused by the global economic recession drove a $535 million or 16.2% decrease in total revenues on 3.6% lower capacity as compared to the 2008 period. The declines in revenues were offset by lower fuel expense as US Airways’ mainline and Express fuel expense for the third quarter of 2009 was $754 million or 51.7% lower than the 2008 period on 3.6% lower capacity. The average mainline and Express price per gallon of fuel decreased 49.3% to $1.90 in the third quarter of 2009 from $3.75 in the third quarter of 2008. US Airways’ third quarter 2009 results were also impacted by recognition of the following items:
   
$50 million of net realized losses on settled fuel hedging instruments, offset by $48 million of net unrealized gains resulting from the application of mark-to-market accounting for changes in the fair value of fuel hedging instruments. In mark-to-market accounting, the unrealized losses recognized in prior periods are reversed as hedge transactions are settled in the current period. US Airways was required to use mark-to-market accounting as its fuel hedging instruments did not meet the requirements for hedge accounting. If these instruments had qualified for hedge accounting treatment, any unrealized gains or losses would have been recorded in other comprehensive income, a component of stockholder’s equity;
   
$15 million of net special charges consisting of $10 million in aircraft costs as a result of US Airways’ previously announced capacity reductions and $5 million in severance and other charges; and
   
$3 million in other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charges included in nonoperating expense, net for US Airways’ investments in auction rate securities.
In the three months ended September 30, 2008, US Airways realized an operating loss of $688 million and a loss before income taxes of $852 million. The third quarter of 2008 loss was driven by an average price per gallon of fuel of $3.75 for mainline and Express operations. US Airways’ third quarter 2008 results were also impacted by recognition of the following items:
   
$488 million of net unrealized losses resulting from the application of mark-to-market accounting for changes in the fair value of fuel hedging instruments, offset by $68 million of net realized gains on settled fuel hedging instruments;
   
$8 million of net special charges for severance costs as a result of US Airways’ capacity reductions; and
   
$127 million in other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charges included in nonoperating expense, net for US Airways’ investments in auction rate securities.
In the first nine months of 2009, US Airways realized operating income of $96 million and a loss before income taxes of $94 million. The weak demand environment caused by the global economic recession drove a $1.5 billion or 15.9% decrease in total revenues on 5.3% lower capacity as compared to the 2008 period. The declines in revenues were offset by lower fuel expense as US Airways’ mainline and Express fuel expense for the first nine months of 2009 was $2.17 billion or 54.7% lower than the 2008 period on 5.3% lower capacity. The average mainline and Express price per gallon of fuel decreased 51.5% to $1.67 in the first nine months of 2009 from $3.44 in the 2008 period. US Airways’ results for the first nine months of 2009 were also impacted by recognition of the following items:
   
$382 million of net realized losses on settled fuel hedging instruments, offset by $375 million of net unrealized gains resulting from the application of mark-to-market accounting for changes in the fair value of fuel hedging instruments;
   
$22 million of net special charges consisting of $16 million in aircraft costs as a result of US Airways’ previously announced capacity reductions and $6 million in severance and other charges; and
   
$10 million in other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charges for US Airways’ investments in auction rate securities as well as a $2 million non-cash asset impairment charge, all included in nonoperating expense, net.

 

42


Table of Contents

In the first nine months of 2008, US Airways realized an operating loss of $1.42 billion and a loss before income taxes of $1.64 billion. The loss in the first nine months of 2008 was driven by an average price per gallon of fuel of $3.44 for mainline and Express operations as well as a $622 million non-cash charge to write off all the goodwill created by the merger of US Airways Group and America West Holdings in September 2005. US Airways’ results for the first nine months of 2008 were also impacted by recognition of the following items:
   
$342 million of net realized gains on settled fuel hedging instruments, offset by $262 million of net unrealized losses resulting from the application of mark-to-market accounting for changes in the fair value of fuel hedging instruments;
   
$67 million of net special charges consisting of $35 million of merger related transition expenses, $18 million in non-cash charges related to the decline in the fair value of certain spare parts associated with US Airways’ Boeing 737 aircraft fleet, and as a result of US Airways’ capacity reductions, $8 million in severance charges and $6 million in aircraft costs; and
   
$140 million in other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charges for US Airways’ investments in auction rate securities, a $2 million write off of debt discount and debt issuance costs in connection with the refinancing of certain aircraft equipment notes, offset by $8 million in gains on forgiveness of debt, all included in nonoperating expense, net.
At December 31, 2008, US Airways had approximately $1.3 billion of gross NOL to reduce future federal taxable income, substantially all of which is available to reduce federal taxable income in the calendar year 2009. The NOL expires during the years 2022 through 2028. US Airways’ deferred tax asset, which included $1.2 billion of the NOL discussed above, has been subject to a full valuation allowance. US Airways also had approximately $72 million of tax-effected state NOL at December 31, 2008.
US Airways reported a loss in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and did not record a tax provision in any 2009 period.
US Airways recorded income tax expense of $3 million in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 related to a reconciliation of the 2007 tax provision to the tax return as filed in the third quarter of 2008.

 

43


Table of Contents

The table below sets forth US Airways’ selected mainline and Express operating data:
                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Percent     Nine Months Ended     Percent  
    September 30,     Change     September 30,     Change  
    2009     2008     2009-2008     2009     2008     2009-2008  
Mainline
                                               
Revenue passenger miles (millions) (a)
    15,719       16,270       (3.4 )     44,553       46,952       (5.1 )
Available seat miles (millions) (b)
    18,718       19,402       (3.5 )     54,007       57,124       (5.5 )
Passenger load factor (percent) (c)
    84.0       83.9       0.1  pts     82.5       82.2       0.3  pts
Yield (cents) (d)
    11.18       13.50       (17.2 )     11.43       13.56       (15.7 )
Passenger revenue per available seat mile (cents) (e)
    9.39       11.32       (17.1 )     9.43       11.14       (15.4 )
Aircraft at end of period
    348       358       (2.8 )     348       358       (2.8 )
Fuel consumption (gallons in millions)
    282       297       (5.0 )     818       882       (7.2 )
Average aircraft fuel price including related taxes (dollars per gallon)
    1.89       3.73       (49.4 )     1.65       3.42       (51.7 )
Express (f)
                                               
Revenue passenger miles (millions) (a)
    2,873       2,942       (2.4 )     8,055       8,333       (3.3 )
Available seat miles (millions) (b)
    3,785       3,943       (4.0 )     10,917       11,434       (4.5 )
Passenger load factor (percent) (c)
    75.9       74.6       1.3  pts     73.8       72.9       0.9  pts
Yield (cents) (d)
    23.06       26.20       (12.0 )     23.04       26.76       (13.9 )
Passenger revenue per available seat mile (cents) (e)
    17.50       19.55       (10.5 )     17.00       19.50       (12.8 )
Aircraft at end of period
    288       296       (2.7 )     288       296       (2.7 )
Fuel consumption (gallons in millions)
    89       92       (3.6 )     256       269       (4.7 )
Average aircraft fuel price including related taxes (dollars per gallon)
    1.93       3.80       (49.3 )     1.71       3.49       (51.0 )
Total Mainline and Express
                                               
Revenue passenger miles (millions) (a)
    18,592       19,212       (3.2 )     52,608       55,285       (4.8 )
Available seat miles (millions) (b)
    22,503       23,345       (3.6 )     64,924       68,558       (5.3 )
Passenger load factor (percent) (c)
    82.6       82.3       0.3  pts     81.0       80.6       0.4  pts
Yield (cents) (d)
    13.01       15.45       (15.8 )     13.21       15.55       (15.0 )
Passenger revenue per available seat mile (cents) (e)
    10.75       12.71       (15.4 )     10.70       12.54       (14.6 )
Total revenue per available seat mile (cents) (g)
    12.26       14.11       (13.1 )     12.24       13.78       (11.2 )
Aircraft at end of period
    636       654       (2.8 )     636       654       (2.8 )
Fuel consumption (gallons in millions)
    371       389       (4.7 )     1,074       1,151       (6.6 )
Average aircraft fuel price including related taxes (dollars per gallon)
    1.90       3.75       (49.3 )     1.67       3.44       (51.5 )
 
     
(a)  
Revenue passenger mile (“RPM”) — A basic measure of sales volume. A RPM represents one passenger flown one mile.
 
(b)  
Available seat mile (“ASM”) — A basic measure of production. An ASM represents one seat flown one mile.
 
(c)  
Passenger load factor — The percentage of available seats that are filled with revenue passengers.
 
(d)  
Yield — A measure of airline revenue derived by dividing passenger revenue by revenue passenger miles and expressed in cents per mile.
 
(e)  
Passenger revenue per available seat mile (“PRASM”) — Passenger revenues divided by available seat miles.
 
(f)  
Express statistics include Piedmont and PSA, as well as operating and financial results from capacity purchase agreements with Air Wisconsin Airlines Corporation, Republic Airways, Mesa Airlines, Inc. and Chautauqua Airlines, Inc.
 
(g)  
Total revenue per available seat mile (“RASM”) — Total revenues divided by total mainline and Express available seat miles.

 

44


Table of Contents

Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
Compared with the
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
Operating Revenues:
                         
                    Percent  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In millions)        
Operating revenues:
                       
Mainline passenger
  $ 1,757     $ 2,197       (20.0 )
Express passenger
    662       771       (14.1 )
Cargo
    23       37       (36.5 )
Other
    316       288       9.5  
 
                   
Total operating revenues
  $ 2,758     $ 3,293       (16.2 )
 
                   
Total operating revenues in the third quarter of 2009 were $2.76 billion as compared to $3.29 billion in the 2008 period, a decline of $535 million or 16.2%. The weak demand environment in 2009 drove a $549 million or 18.5% decrease in mainline and Express passenger revenues on 3.6% lower capacity as compared to the 2008 period. The increase in ancillary revenues resulting from US Airways’ new revenue initiatives implemented in the latter part of 2008 offset a portion of this decline. As a result, on a period over period basis, total RASM decreased by only 13.1% as compared to mainline and Express PRASM, which decreased by 15.4%. Significant changes in the components of operating revenues are as follows:
   
Mainline passenger revenues were $1.76 billion in the third quarter of 2009 as compared to $2.2 billion for the 2008 period. Mainline RPMs decreased 3.4% as mainline capacity, as measured by ASMs, decreased 3.5%, resulting in a 0.1 point increase in load factor to 84%. Mainline passenger yield decreased 17.2% to 11.18 cents in the third quarter of 2009 from 13.5 cents in the 2008 period. Mainline PRASM decreased 17.1% to 9.39 cents in the third quarter of 2009 from 11.32 cents in the 2008 period. Mainline yield and PRASM decreased in the third quarter of 2009 due principally to the decline in passenger demand and weak pricing environment driven by the global economic recession.
   
Express passenger revenues were $662 million in the third quarter of 2009, a decrease of $109 million from the 2008 period. Express RPMs decreased by 2.4% as Express capacity, as measured by ASMs, decreased 4%, resulting in a 1.3 point increase in load factor to 75.9%. Express passenger yield decreased by 12% to 23.06 cents in the third quarter of 2009 from 26.2 cents in the 2008 period. Express PRASM decreased 10.5% to 17.5 cents in the third quarter of 2009 from 19.55 cents in the 2008 period. The decreases in Express yield and PRASM were the result of the same passenger demand declines and weak pricing environment discussed in mainline passenger revenues above.
   
Cargo revenues were $23 million in the third quarter of 2009, a decrease of $14 million or 36.5% from the 2008 period. The decrease in cargo revenues was driven by declines in freight volumes as a result of the contraction of business spending in the current economic environment as well as a decrease in fuel surcharges in 2009 as compared to the 2008 period.
   
Other revenues were $316 million in the third quarter of 2009, an increase of $28 million or 9.5% from the 2008 period primarily due to an increase of $46 million generated by US Airways’ first checked bag fees, which were implemented in the third quarter of 2008. This increase was offset in part by a decline in the volume of passenger ticketing change fees.

 

45


Table of Contents

Operating Expenses:
                         
                    Percent  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In millions)        
Operating expenses:
                       
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
  $ 534     $ 1,110       (51.9 )
Loss (gain) on fuel hedging instruments, net:
                       
Realized
    50       (68 )   nm  
Unrealized
    (48 )     488     nm  
Salaries and related costs
    553       567       (2.5 )
Aircraft rent
    171       183       (6.4 )
Aircraft maintenance
    174       188       (7.5 )
Other rent and landing fees
    148       137       8.2  
Selling expenses
    99       120       (17.3 )
Special items, net
    15       8       81.6  
Depreciation and amortization
    65       55       19.3  
Other
    307       321       (4.4 )
 
                   
Total mainline operating expenses
    2,068       3,109       (33.5 )
Express expenses:
                       
Fuel
    171       349       (51.1 )
Other
    518       523       (1.1 )
 
                   
Total Express expenses
    689       872       (21.1 )
 
                   
Total operating expenses
  $ 2,757     $ 3,981       (30.8 )
 
                   
Total operating expenses were $2.76 billion in the third quarter of 2009, a decrease of $1.22 billion or 30.8% compared to the 2008 period. Mainline operating expenses were $2.07 billion in the third quarter of 2009, a decrease of $1.04 billion or 33.5% from the 2008 period. The period over period decrease in mainline operating expenses was driven principally by decreases in fuel costs ($576 million) as well as a decrease in the net losses on fuel hedging instruments ($418 million) in the 2009 period compared to the 2008 period.
The 2009 period included $15 million of net special charges consisting of $10 million in aircraft costs as a result of US Airways’ previously announced capacity reductions and $5 million in severance and other charges. This compares to net special charges of $8 million in the 2008 period for severance costs as a result of US Airways’ capacity reductions.
Significant changes in the components of mainline operating expenses are as follows:
   
Aircraft fuel and related taxes decreased 51.9% primarily due to a 49.4% decrease in the average price per gallon of fuel to $1.89 in the third quarter of 2009 from $3.73 in the 2008 period. A 5% decrease in gallons of fuel consumed in the 2009 period on 3.5% lower capacity also contributed to the decrease.
   
Loss on fuel hedging instruments, net was a loss of $2 million in the third quarter of 2009 as compared to a loss of $420 million in the third quarter of 2008. Since the third quarter of 2008, US Airways has not entered into any new transactions as part of its fuel hedging program and as of September 30, 2009, there were no remaining outstanding fuel hedging contracts. The net loss in the 2009 period included realized losses of $50 million on settled fuel hedging instruments, offset by net unrealized gains of $48 million. The unrealized gains are the result of the application of mark-to-market accounting in which unrealized losses recognized in prior periods are reversed as hedge transactions are settled in the current period. US Airways recognized net losses from its fuel hedging program in the third quarter of 2008 due to the significant decline in the price of oil in September 2008, which generated unrealized losses on certain open fuel hedging instruments as the price of heating oil fell below the lower limit of those collar transactions.
   
Other rent and landing fees increased 8.2% despite a 3.5% decrease in capacity over the 2008 period due to rate increases in landing fees and space rent at certain airport locations as well as the fixed nature of space rent.
   
Selling expenses decreased 17.3% due to lower credit card fees, booking fees and commissions paid as a result of a decline in the number and value of tickets sold resulting from the weakened demand and pricing caused by the economic recession.
   
Depreciation and amortization expense increased 19.3% due to an increase in the average number of owned aircraft to 75 in the 2009 period from 57 in the 2008 period, which increased depreciation expense. The increase in the average number of owned aircraft included 13 Airbus 320 family, three Embraer 190 and two Airbus 330 aircraft.

 

46


Table of Contents

Total Express expenses decreased $183 million or 21.1% in the third quarter of 2009 to $689 million from $872 million in the 2008 period. The period over period decrease was primarily driven by decreases in fuel costs. Express fuel costs decreased $178 million as the average fuel price per gallon decreased 49.3% from $3.80 in the 2008 period to $1.93 in the 2009 period. In addition, gallons of fuel consumed in 2009 decreased 3.6% on 4% lower capacity. Other Express expenses decreased $5 million or 1.1% despite a 4% decrease in Express ASMs due to certain fixed costs associated with US Airways’ capacity purchase agreements as well as certain contractual rate increases with these carriers.
Nonoperating Income (Expense):
                         
                    Percent  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In millions)        
Nonoperating income (expense):
                       
Interest income
  $ 5     $ 19       (75.1 )
Interest expense, net
    (64 )     (48 )     34.1  
Other, net
    (10 )     (135 )     (93.0 )
 
                   
Total nonoperating expense, net
  $ (69 )   $ (164 )     (57.8 )
 
                   
Net nonoperating expense was $69 million in the third quarter of 2009 as compared to $164 million in the 2008 period. Interest income decreased $14 million in the 2009 period due to lower average investment balances and lower rates of return. Interest expense, net increased $16 million due to an increase in the average debt balance outstanding primarily as a result of financing transactions completed in the fourth quarter of 2008 and first nine months of 2009, partially offset by reductions in average interest rates associated with variable rate debt as compared to the 2008 period.
Other nonoperating expense, net in the 2009 period included a $6 million loss on the sale of certain aircraft equipment and $3 million in other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charges for US Airways’ investments in auction rate securities. Other nonoperating expense, net in the 2008 period included $127 million in other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charges for US Airways’ investments in auction rate securities as well as $8 million in foreign currency losses. The impairment charges on auction rate securities are discussed in more detail under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

 

47


Table of Contents

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Compared with the
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Operating Revenues:
                         
                    Percent  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In millions)        
Operating revenues:
                       
Mainline passenger
  $ 5,092     $ 6,364       (20.0 )
Express passenger
    1,856       2,230       (16.8 )
Cargo
    67       111       (39.3 )
Other
    930       742       25.4  
 
                   
Total operating revenues
  $ 7,945     $ 9,447       (15.9 )
 
                   
Total operating revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $7.95 billion as compared to $9.45 billion in the 2008 period, a decline of $1.5 billion or 15.9%. The weak demand environment in 2009 drove a $1.65 billion or 19.2% decrease in mainline and Express passenger revenues on 5.3% lower capacity as compared to the 2008 period. The increase in ancillary revenues resulting from US Airways’ new revenue initiatives implemented in the latter part of 2008 offset a portion of this decline. As a result, on a period over period basis, total RASM decreased only 11.2% as compared to mainline and Express PRASM, which decreased by 14.6%. Significant changes in the components of operating revenues are as follows:
   
Mainline passenger revenues were $5.09 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $6.36 billion for the 2008 period. Mainline RPMs decreased 5.1% as mainline capacity, as measured by ASMs, decreased 5.5%, resulting in a 0.3 point increase in load factor to 82.5%. Mainline passenger yield decreased 15.7% to 11.43 cents in the first nine months of 2009 from 13.56 cents in the 2008 period. Mainline PRASM decreased 15.4% to 9.43 cents in the first nine months of 2009 from 11.14 cents in the 2008 period. Mainline yield and PRASM decreased in the first nine months of 2009 due principally to the decline in passenger demand and weak pricing environment driven by the global economic recession.
   
Express passenger revenues were $1.86 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $374 million from the 2008 period. Express RPMs decreased by 3.3% as Express capacity, as measured by ASMs, decreased 4.5%, resulting in a 0.9 point increase in load factor to 73.8%. Express passenger yield decreased by 13.9% to 23.04 cents in the first nine months of 2009 from 26.76 cents in the 2008 period. Express PRASM decreased 12.8% to 17 cents in the first nine months of 2009 from 19.5 cents in the 2008 period. The decreases in Express yield and PRASM were the result of the same passenger demand declines and weak pricing environment discussed in mainline passenger revenues above.
   
Cargo revenues were $67 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $44 million or 39.3% from the 2008 period. The decrease in cargo revenues was driven by declines in freight volumes as a result of the contraction of business spending in the current economic environment as well as a decrease in fuel surcharges in 2009 as compared to the 2008 period.
   
Other revenues were $930 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $188 million or 25.4% from the 2008 period. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $221 million generated by US Airways’ first and second checked bag fees, which were implemented in the second and third quarters of 2008. This increase was offset in part by a decline in the volume of passenger ticketing change fees.

 

48


Table of Contents

Operating Expenses:
                         
                    Percent  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In millions)        
Operating expenses:
                       
Aircraft fuel and related taxes
  $ 1,353     $ 3,018       (55.2 )
Loss (gain) on fuel hedging instruments, net:
                       
Realized
    382       (342 )   nm  
Unrealized
    (375 )     262     nm  
Salaries and related costs
    1,653       1,701       (2.8 )
Aircraft rent
    523       544       (3.9 )
Aircraft maintenance
    532       601       (11.4 )
Other rent and landing fees
    422       424       (0.6 )
Selling expenses
    291       340       (14.5 )
Special items, net
    22       67       (67.7 )
Depreciation and amortization
    192       166       15.4  
Goodwill impairment
          622     nm  
Other
    879       977       (9.8 )
 
                   
Total mainline operating expenses
    5,874       8,380       (29.9 )
Express expenses:
                       
Fuel
    438       938       (53.3 )
Other
    1,537       1,547       (0.6 )
 
                   
Total Express expenses
    1,975       2,485       (20.5 )
 
                   
Total operating expenses
  $ 7,849     $ 10,865       (27.8 )
 
                   
Total operating expenses were $7.85 billion in the first nine months of 2009, a decrease of $3.02 billion or 27.8% compared to the 2008 period. Mainline operating expenses were $5.87 billion in the first nine months of 2009, a decrease of $2.51 billion or 29.9% from the 2008 period. The period over period decrease in mainline operating expenses was driven principally by decreases in fuel costs ($1.67 billion) in the 2009 period. The 2008 period included a $622 million non-cash charge to write off all of the goodwill created by the merger of US Airways Group and America West Holdings in September 2005.
The 2009 period included $22 million of net special charges consisting of $16 million in aircraft costs as a result of US Airways’ previously announced capacity reductions and $6 million in severance and other charges. This compares to net special charges of $67 million in the 2008 period, consisting of $35 million of merger related transition expenses, $18 million in non-cash charges related to the decline in the fair value of certain spare parts associated with US Airways’ Boeing 737 aircraft fleet, and as a result of US Airways’ capacity reductions, $8 million in severance charges and $6 million in aircraft costs.
Significant changes in the components of mainline operating expenses are as follows:
   
Aircraft fuel and related taxes decreased 55.2% primarily due to a 51.7% decrease in the average price per gallon of fuel to $1.65 in the first nine months of 2009 from $3.42 in the 2008 period. A 7.2% decrease in gallons of fuel consumed in the 2009 period on 5.5% lower capacity also contributed to the decrease.
   
Loss (gain) on fuel hedging instruments, net fluctuated to a loss of $7 million in the first nine months of 2009 from a gain of $80 million in the first nine months of 2008. Since the third quarter of 2008, US Airways has not entered into any new transactions as part of its fuel hedging program and as of September 30, 2009, there were no remaining outstanding fuel hedging contracts. The net loss in the 2009 period included realized losses of $382 million on settled fuel hedging instruments, offset by $375 million of net unrealized gains. The unrealized gains are the result of the application of mark-to-market accounting in which unrealized losses recognized in prior periods are reversed as hedge transactions are settled in the current period. US Airways recognized net gains from its fuel hedging program in the first nine months of 2008 as the price of heating oil exceeded the upper limit on certain of its collar transactions.
   
Aircraft maintenance expense decreased 11.4% due principally to decreases in the number of engine and landing gear overhauls performed in the 2009 period as compared to the 2008 period as a result of the timing of maintenance cycles.
   
Selling expenses decreased 14.5% due to lower credit card fees, booking fees and commissions paid as a result of a decline in the number and value of tickets sold resulting from the weakened demand and pricing caused by the economic recession.

 

49


Table of Contents

   
Depreciation and amortization expense increased 15.4% due to an increase in the average number of owned aircraft to 69 in the 2009 period from 51 in the 2008 period, which increased depreciation expense. The increase in the average number of owned aircraft included nine Airbus 320 family, eight Embraer 190 and one Airbus 330 aircraft
   
Other expense decreased 9.8% due to a decrease in the incremental cost of travel awards associated with US Airways’ frequent traveler program, principally as a result of lower fuel costs. US Airways’ continued focus on overall cost control also contributed to the decrease.
Total Express expenses decreased $510 million or 20.5% in the first nine months of 2009 to $1.98 billion from $2.49 billion in the 2008 period. The period over period decrease was primarily driven by decreases in fuel costs. Express fuel costs decreased $500 million as the average fuel price per gallon decreased 51% from $3.49 in the first nine months of 2008 to $1.71 in the 2009 period. In addition, gallons of fuel consumed in 2009 decreased 4.7% on 4.5% lower capacity. Other Express expenses decreased $10 million or 0.6% despite a 4.5% decrease in Express ASMs due to certain fixed costs associated with US Airways’ capacity purchase agreements as well as certain contractual rate increases with these carriers.
Nonoperating Income (Expense):
                         
                Percent  
    2009     2008     Change  
    (In millions)        
Nonoperating income (expense):
                       
Interest income
  $ 17     $ 68       (74.6 )
Interest expense, net
    (189 )     (146 )     29.0  
Other, net
    (18 )     (140 )     (87.1 )
 
                   
Total nonoperating expense, net
  $ (190 )   $ (218 )     (13.0 )
 
                   
Net nonoperating expense was $190 million in the first nine months of 2009 as compared to $218 million in the 2008 period. Interest income decreased $51 million in the 2009 period due to lower average investment balances and lower rates of return. Interest expense, net increased $43 million due to an increase in the average debt balance outstanding primarily as a result of financing transactions completed in the fourth quarter of 2008 and first nine months of 2009, partially offset by reductions in average interest rates associated with variable rate debt as compared to the 2008 period.
Other nonoperating expense, net in the 2009 period included $10 million in other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charges for US Airways’ investments in auction rate securities, a $6 million loss on the sale of certain aircraft equipment and a $2 million non-cash asset impairment charge, offset by $2 million in foreign currency gains. Other nonoperating expense, net in the 2008 period included $140 million in other-than-temporary non-cash impairment charges for US Airways’ investments in auction rate securities, $6 million in foreign currency losses, and a $2 million write off of debt discount and debt issuance costs in connection with the refinancing of certain aircraft equipment notes, offset by $8 million in gains on forgiveness of debt. The impairment charges on auction rate securities are discussed in more detail under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

 

50


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2009, our cash, cash equivalents, investments in marketable securities and restricted cash were $2 billion, of which $530 million was restricted. Our investments in marketable securities included $228 million of auction rate securities at fair value ($411 million par value) that are classified as noncurrent assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Investments in Marketable Securities
As of September 30, 2009, we held auction rate securities totaling $411 million at par value, which are classified as available for sale securities and noncurrent assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Contractual maturities for these auction rate securities range from seven to 43 years, with 62% of our portfolio maturing within the next 10 years (2016 — 2017), 10% maturing within the next 20 years (2025), 16% maturing within the next 30 years (2033 — 2036) and 12% maturing thereafter (2039 — 2052). With the liquidity issues experienced in the global credit and capital markets, all of our auction rate securities have experienced failed auctions since August 2007. The estimated fair value of these auction rate securities no longer approximates par value. As of September 30, 2009, the fair value of our auction rate securities was $228 million, a net increase of $14 million from June 30, 2009 and $41 million from December 31, 2008.
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded unrealized gains of $17 million and $51 million, respectively, in other comprehensive income related to the increase in fair value of certain of our investments in auction rate securities. These unrealized gains were offset by other-than-temporary impairment charges of $3 million and $10 million, respectively, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. These other-than-temporary impairment charges are recorded in other nonoperating expense, net and relate to the decline in fair value of certain of our investments in auction rate securities.
We continue to monitor the market for auction rate securities and consider its impact (if any) on the fair value of our investments. If the current market conditions deteriorate, we may be required to record additional impairment charges in other nonoperating expense, net in future periods.
We believe that, based on our current unrestricted cash and cash equivalents balance at September 30, 2009, the current lack of liquidity in our investments in auction rate securities will not have a material impact on our liquidity, our cash flow or our ability to fund our operations.
Sources and Uses of Cash
US Airways Group
Net cash provided by operating activities was $130 million for the first nine months of 2009 as compared to net cash used in operating activities of $583 million for the first nine months of 2008. The period over period increase of $713 million was primarily driven by a decrease in the net loss recognized in the first nine months of 2009 as compared to the first nine months of 2008. Fuel costs were substantially lower in the 2009 period, which was offset in part by a decline in revenues. Our mainline and Express fuel expense was $2.17 billion lower in the 2009 period as compared to the 2008 period on 5.3% lower capacity. Total revenues declined $1.53 billion due to the economic slowdown and resulting weak revenue environment in 2009.
Net cash used in investing activities was $646 million and $832 million for the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Principal investing activities in the 2009 period included expenditures for property and equipment totaling $676 million, including the purchase of 10 Airbus aircraft, and a $55 million increase in equipment purchase deposits for certain aircraft on order, offset by $55 million in proceeds from the disposition of property and equipment and net sales of investments in marketable securities of $20 million. The $55 million in proceeds resulted from a swap of an owned aircraft for the aircraft involved in the Flight 1549 accident as allowed under our lease agreement and three engine sale-leaseback transactions. Principal investing activities in the 2008 period included expenditures for property and equipment totaling $755 million, including the purchase of 13 Embraer aircraft and three Airbus aircraft, a $117 million increase in restricted cash and a $97 million increase in equipment purchase deposits for certain aircraft on order, all of which were offset in part by net sales of investments in marketable securities of $117 million. The change in the restricted cash balance was due to a change in the amount of holdback by certain credit card processors for advance ticket sales for which we had not yet provided air transportation.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $724 million and $635 million for the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Principal financing activities in the 2009 period included proceeds from the issuance of debt of $803 million, which included the issuance of $172 million of convertible notes, additional loans under a spare parts loan agreement, a loan secured by certain airport landing slots, an unsecured financing with one of our third party Express carriers and the financing associated with the purchase of 10 Airbus aircraft acquisitions. Debt repayments totaled $271 million in the 2009 period. Financing activities in the 2009 period also included net proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $66 million as a result of a public stock offering of 17.5 million shares in May 2009 and $137 million as a result of a public stock offering of 29 million shares in September 2009. Principal financing activities in the 2008 period included proceeds from the issuance of debt of $669 million, in part to finance the acquisition of 13 Embraer aircraft and three Airbus aircraft, and $145 million in proceeds from the refinancing of certain aircraft equipment notes. Debt repayments were $205 million, including $97 million related to the $145 million aircraft equipment note refinancing discussed above. Financing activities in the 2008 period also included $179 million in net proceeds from the issuance of common stock as a result of a public stock offering of 21.85 million common shares during the third quarter of 2008.

 

51


Table of Contents

US Airways
Net cash provided by operating activities was $211 million for the first nine months of 2009 as compared to net cash used in operating activities of $438 million for the first nine months of 2008. The period over period increase of $649 million was primarily driven by a decrease in the net loss recognized in the first nine months of 2009 as compared to the first nine months of 2008. Fuel costs were substantially lower in the 2009 period, which was offset in part by a decline in revenues. US Airways’ mainline and Express fuel expense was $2.17 billion lower in the 2009 period as compared to the 2008 period on 5.3% lower capacity. Total revenues declined $1.5 billion due to the economic slowdown and resulting weak revenue environment in 2009.
Net cash used in investing activities was $642 million and $811 million for the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Principal investing activities in the 2009 period included expenditures for property and equipment totaling $672 million, including the purchase of 10 Airbus aircraft, and a $55 million increase in equipment purchase deposits for certain aircraft on order, offset by $55 million in proceeds from the disposition of property and equipment and net sales of investments in marketable securities of $20 million. The $55 million in proceeds resulted from a swap of an owned aircraft for the aircraft involved in the Flight 1549 accident as allowed under US Airways’ lease agreement and three engine sale-leaseback transactions. Principal investing activities in the 2008 period included expenditures for property and equipment totaling $734 million, including the purchase of 13 Embraer aircraft and three Airbus aircraft, a $117 million increase in restricted cash and a $97 million increase in equipment purchase deposits for certain aircraft on order, all of which were offset in part by net sales of investments in marketable securities of $117 million. The change in the restricted cash balance was due to a change in the amount of holdback by certain credit card processors for advance ticket sales for which US Airways had not yet provided air transportation.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $370 million and $472 million for the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Principal financing activities in the 2009 period included proceeds from the issuance of debt of $631 million, which included additional loans under a spare parts loan agreement, a loan secured by certain airport landing slots, an unsecured financing with one of US Airways’ third party Express carriers and the financing associated with the purchase of 10 Airbus aircraft acquisitions. Debt repayments totaled $255 million in the 2009 period. Principal financing activities in the 2008 period included proceeds from the issuance of debt of $669 million, in part to finance the acquisition of 13 Embraer aircraft and three Airbus aircraft, and $145 million in proceeds from the refinancing of certain aircraft equipment notes. Debt repayments were $189 million, including $97 million related to the $145 million aircraft equipment note refinancing discussed above.
Commitments
As of September 30, 2009, we had $4.86 billion of long-term debt and capital leases (including current maturities and before discount on debt). The information contained herein is not a comprehensive discussion and analysis of our commitments, but rather updates disclosures made in the 2008 Form 10-K.
Citicorp Credit Facility
On March 23, 2007, US Airways Group entered into a term loan credit facility with Citicorp North America, Inc., as administrative agent, and a syndicate of lenders pursuant to which US Airways Group borrowed an aggregate principal amount of $1.6 billion. US Airways, AWA and certain other subsidiaries of US Airways Group are guarantors of the Citicorp credit facility.
The Citicorp credit facility bears interest at an index rate plus an applicable index margin or, at our option, LIBOR plus an applicable LIBOR margin for interest periods of one, two, three or six months. The applicable index margin, subject to adjustment, is 1.00%, 1.25% or 1.50% if the adjusted loan balance is less than $600 million, between $600 million and $1 billion, or greater than $1 billion, respectively. The applicable LIBOR margin, subject to adjustment, is 2.00%, 2.25% or 2.50% if the adjusted loan balance is less than $600 million, between $600 million and $1 billion, or greater than $1 billion, respectively. In addition, interest on the Citicorp credit facility may be adjusted based on the credit rating for the Citicorp credit facility as follows: (i) if the credit ratings of the Citicorp credit facility by Moody’s and S&P in effect as of the last day of the most recently ended fiscal quarter are both at least one subgrade better than the credit ratings in effect on March 23, 2007, then (A) the applicable LIBOR margin will be the lower of 2.25% and the rate otherwise applicable based upon the adjusted Citicorp credit facility balance and (B) the applicable index margin will be the lower of 1.25% and the rate otherwise applicable based upon the Citicorp credit facility principal balance, and (ii) if the credit ratings of the Citicorp credit facility by Moody’s and S&P in effect as of the last day of the most recently ended fiscal quarter are both at least two subgrades better than the credit ratings in effect on March 23, 2007, then (A) the applicable LIBOR margin will be 2.00% and (B) the applicable index margin will be 1.00%. As of September 30, 2009, the interest rate on the Citicorp credit facility was 2.75% based on a 2.50% LIBOR margin.

 

52


Table of Contents

The Citicorp credit facility matures on March 23, 2014, and is repayable in seven annual installments with each of the first six installments to be paid on each anniversary of the closing date in an amount equal to 1% of the initial aggregate principal amount of the loan and the final installment to be paid on the maturity date in the amount of the full remaining balance of the loan.
In addition, the Citicorp credit facility requires certain mandatory prepayments upon the occurrence of certain events, establishes certain financial covenants, including minimum cash requirements and maintenance of certain minimum ratios, contains customary affirmative covenants and negative covenants and contains customary events of default. Prior to the amendment discussed below, the Citicorp credit facility required us to maintain consolidated unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of not less than $1.25 billion, with not less than $750 million (subject to partial reductions upon certain reductions in the outstanding principal amount of the loan) of that amount held in accounts subject to control agreements, which would become restricted for use by us if certain adverse events occur per the terms of the agreement.
On October 20, 2008, US Airways Group entered into an amendment to the Citicorp credit facility. Pursuant to the amendment, we repaid $400 million of indebtedness under the credit facility, reducing the principal amount outstanding under the credit facility to approximately $1.17 billion as of September 30, 2009. The Citicorp credit facility amendment also provides for a reduction in the amount of unrestricted cash required to be held by us from $1.25 billion to $850 million. In addition, the Citicorp credit facility amendment provides that we may issue debt in the future with a silent second lien on the assets pledged as collateral under the Citicorp credit facility. As of September 30, 2009, we were in compliance with all debt covenants under the amended credit facility.
7.25% Convertible Senior Notes
In May 2009, US Airways Group issued $172 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014 (the “7.25% notes”) for proceeds, net of expenses, of approximately $168 million. The 7.25% notes bear interest at a rate of 7.25% per annum, which shall be payable semi-annually in arrears on each May 15 and November 15, beginning November 15, 2009. The 7.25% notes mature on May 15, 2014.
Holders may convert their 7.25% notes at their option at any time prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date for the 7.25% notes. Upon conversion, we will pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, shares of our common stock or a combination thereof at our election. The initial conversion rate for the 7.25% notes is 218.8184 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $4.57 per share). Such conversion rate is subject to adjustment in certain events.
If we undergo a fundamental change, holders may require us to purchase all or a portion of their 7.25% notes for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 7.25% notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the purchase date. A fundamental change includes a person or group (other than us or our subsidiaries) becoming the beneficial owner of more than 50% of the voting power of our capital stock, certain merger or combination transactions, a substantial turnover of our directors, stockholder approval of our liquidation or dissolution and US Airways Group’s common stock ceasing to be listed on at least one national securities exchange.
The 7.25% notes rank equal in right of payment to all of our other existing and future unsecured senior debt and senior in right of payment to our debt that is expressly subordinated to the 7.25% notes, if any. The 7.25% notes impose no limit on the amount of debt we or our subsidiaries may incur. The 7.25% notes are structurally subordinated to all debt and other liabilities and commitments (including trade payables) of our subsidiaries. The 7.25% notes are also effectively junior to our secured debt, if any, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt.
As the 7.25% notes can be settled in cash upon conversion, for accounting purposes, the 7.25% notes were bifurcated into a debt component that is initially recorded at fair value and an equity component. In addition to the 7.25% coupon interest, we expect to record non-cash interest expense of $3 million in 2009, $12 million in 2010, $16 million in 2011, $22 million in 2012, $29 million in 2013 and $13 million in 2014 representing the amortization of the discounted carrying value of the 7.25% notes to its face value over the five year term.
Other 2009 Financing Transactions
On January 16, 2009, US Airways exercised its right to obtain new loan commitments and incur additional loans under a spare parts loan agreement. In connection with the exercise of that right, Airbus Financial Services funded $50 million in satisfaction of a previous commitment. This loan will mature on October 20, 2014, bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin and is secured by the collateral securing loans under the spare parts loan agreement.

 

53


Table of Contents

On March 31, 2009, US Airways again exercised its right to obtain new loan commitments and incur additional loans under the spare parts loan agreement and borrowed $50 million. This loan will mature on October 20, 2014, bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin and is secured by the collateral securing loans under the spare parts loan agreement. US Airways used a portion of the proceeds to purchase an A321 aircraft previously leased to US Airways by an affiliate of the debt holder. As a result, this aircraft became unencumbered.
In June 2009, US Airways entered into loan agreements totaling $132 million to finance the acquisition of certain A330-200 aircraft. The loans bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus an applicable margin, contain default provisions and other covenants that are typical in the industry for similar financings and are amortized over seven years with balloon payments at maturity.
In the third quarter of 2009, US Airways utilized backstop financing through the manufacturer totaling $104 million to finance the acquisition of certain A320 family aircraft. The financing bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus an applicable margin, contains default provisions and other covenants that are typical in the industry for similar financings and is amortized over twelve years.
US Airways Group had previously entered into a co-branded credit card agreement with Barclays Bank Delaware. The agreement provides for, among other things, the pre-purchase of frequent flyer miles in the aggregate amount of $200 million. Barclays has agreed that it will pre-purchase additional miles on a monthly basis in an amount equal to the difference between $200 million and the amount of unused miles then outstanding, which purchases average approximately $17 million per month. Among the conditions to this monthly purchase of miles is a requirement that US Airways Group maintain an unrestricted cash balance of at least $1.5 billion. In September 2009, Barclays agreed to temporarily reduce this requirement to $1.35 billion for the months of August through October 2009.
Credit Card Processing Agreements
We have agreements with companies that process customer credit card transactions for the sale of air travel and other services. Credit card processors have financial risk associated with tickets purchased for travel because, although the processor generally forwards the cash related to the purchase to us soon after the purchase is completed, the air travel generally occurs after that time, and the processor may have liability if we do not ultimately provide the air travel. Our agreements allow these processing companies, under certain conditions, to hold an amount of our cash (referred to as a “holdback”) equal to a portion of advance ticket sales that have been processed by that company, but for which we have not yet provided the air transportation. These holdback requirements can be modified at the discretion of the processing companies, up to the estimated liability for future air travel purchased with the respective credit cards, upon the occurrence of specified events, including material adverse changes in our financial condition. The amount that the processing companies may withhold also varies as a result of changes in financial risk due to seasonal fluctuations in ticket volume. Additional holdback requirements will reduce our liquidity in the form of unrestricted cash and short-term investments by the amount of the holdbacks.
Aircraft and Engine Purchase Commitments
US Airways has definitive purchase agreements with Airbus for the acquisition of 134 aircraft, including 97 single-aisle A320 family aircraft and 37 widebody aircraft (comprised of 22 A350 XWB aircraft and 15 A330-200 aircraft). Deliveries of the A320 family aircraft commenced during 2008 with the delivery of five A321 aircraft. During the first nine months of 2009, US Airways took delivery of 12 A321 aircraft and three A330-200 aircraft. Of the 12 A321 aircraft, eight were financed through existing financing facilities, three were financed using manufacturer backstop financing and one was financed through a leasing transaction. Of the three A330-200 aircraft, two were financed through the June 2009 agreements discussed above and one was financed through a leasing transaction. US Airways plans to take delivery of six A321 aircraft, two A320 aircraft and two A330-200 aircraft prior to the end of 2009. Deliveries of the remaining A320 family aircraft and the A330-200 aircraft will continue through 2012 and deliveries of the A350 XWB aircraft will begin in 2015 and extend through 2018.
US Airways has agreements for the purchase of eight new IAE V2500-A5 spare engines scheduled for delivery through 2014 for use on the Airbus A320 family fleet, three new Trent 700 spare engines scheduled for delivery through 2011 for use on the Airbus A330-200 fleet and three new Trent XWB spare engines scheduled for delivery in 2015 through 2017 for use on the Airbus A350 XWB aircraft. US Airways has taken delivery of one Trent 700 spare engine, which was financed through a leasing transaction.
Under all of our aircraft and engine purchase agreements, our total future commitments as of September 30, 2009 are expected to be approximately $6 billion through 2018, which includes predelivery deposits and payments. The remaining A320 family aircraft scheduled for delivery in 2009 have backstop financing available through the manufacturer and we have secured financing for the remaining two A330-200 deliveries scheduled for delivery in 2009. See “Risk Factors — Our high level of fixed obligations limits our ability to fund general corporate requirements and obtain additional financing, limits our flexibility in responding to competitive developments and increases our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions” in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”

 

54


Table of Contents

Covenants and Credit Rating
In addition to the minimum cash balance requirements, our long-term debt agreements contain various negative covenants that restrict or limit our actions, including our ability to pay dividends or make other restricted payments. Certain long-term debt agreements also contain cross-default provisions, which may be triggered by defaults by us under other agreements relating to indebtedness. See “Risk Factors — Our high level of fixed obligations limits our ability to fund general corporate requirements and obtain additional financing, limits our flexibility in responding to competitive developments and increases our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions” in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” As of September 30, 2009, we and our subsidiaries were in compliance with the covenants in our long-term debt agreements.
Our credit ratings, like those of most airlines, are relatively low. The following table details our credit ratings as of September 30, 2009:
             
    S&P   Fitch   Moody’s
    Local Issuer   Issuer Default   Corporate
    credit rating   credit rating   Family rating
US Airways Group
  B-   CCC   Caa1
US Airways
  B-   *   *
     
(*)  
The credit agencies do not rate these categories for US Airways.
A decrease in our credit ratings could cause our borrowing costs to increase, which would increase our interest expense and could affect our net income, and our credit ratings could adversely affect our ability to obtain additional financing. If our financial performance or industry conditions do not improve, we may face future downgrades, which could further negatively impact our borrowing costs and the prices of our equity or debt securities. In addition, any downgrade of our credit ratings may indicate a decline in our business and in our ability to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness.

 

55


Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
An off-balance sheet arrangement is any transaction, agreement or other contractual arrangement involving an unconsolidated entity under which a company has (1) made guarantees, (2) a retained or a contingent interest in transferred assets, (3) an obligation under derivative instruments classified as equity or (4) any obligation arising out of a material variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to us, or that engages in leasing, hedging or research and development arrangements with us.
There have been no material changes in our off-balance sheet arrangements as set forth in our 2008 Form 10-K.
Contractual Obligations
The following table provides details of our future cash contractual obligations as of September 30, 2009 (in millions):
                                                         
    Payments Due by Period  
    2009     2010     2011     2012     2013     Thereafter     Total  
US Airways Group (1)
                                                       
Debt (2)
  $     $ 33     $ 116     $ 99     $ 16     $ 1,350     $ 1,614  
Interest obligations (3)
    15       59       56       51       48       55       284  
US Airways (4)
                                                       
Debt and capital lease obligations (5) (6)
    148       403       335       298       248       1,815       3,247  
Interest obligations (3) (6)
    37       138       153       135       92       431       986  
Aircraft purchase and operating lease commitments (7)
    698       2,394       2,213       1,610       737       5,869       13,521  
Regional capacity purchase agreements (8)
    247       1,030       1,050       915       784       2,812       6,838  
Other US Airways Group subsidiaries (9)
    2       2       1       1       1             7  
 
                                         
Total
  $ 1,147     $ 4,059     $ 3,924     $ 3,109     $ 1,926     $ 12,332     $ 26,497  
 
                                         
 
     
(1)  
These commitments represent those specifically entered into by US Airways Group or joint commitments entered into by US Airways Group and US Airways under which each entity is jointly and severally liable.
 
(2)  
Excludes $136 million of unamortized debt discount as of September 30, 2009.
 
(3)  
For variable-rate debt, future interest obligations are shown above using interest rates in effect as of September 30, 2009.
 
(4)  
Commitments listed separately under US Airways and its wholly owned subsidiaries represent commitments under agreements entered into separately by those companies.
 
(5)  
Excludes $99 million of unamortized debt discount as of September 30, 2009.
 
(6)  
Includes $505 million of future principal payments and $229 million of future interest payments as of September 30, 2009, respectively, related to pass through trust certificates or EETCs associated with mortgage financings for the purchase of certain aircraft.
 
(7)  
Includes $3.27 billion of future minimum lease payments related to EETC leveraged leased financings of certain aircraft as of September 30, 2009.
 
(8)  
Represents minimum payments under capacity purchase agreements with third-party Express carriers.
 
(9)  
Represents operating lease commitments entered into by US Airways Group’s other airline subsidiaries Piedmont and PSA.
We expect to fund these cash obligations from funds provided by operations and future financings, if necessary. The cash available to us from these sources, however, may not be sufficient to cover these cash obligations because economic factors outside our control may reduce the amount of cash generated by operations or increase our costs. For instance, a prolonged or continuing economic downturn or general global instability caused by military actions, terrorism, disease outbreaks and natural disasters could reduce the demand for air travel, which would reduce the amount of cash generated by operations. An increase in our costs, either due to an increase in borrowing costs caused by a reduction in our credit rating or a general increase in interest rates or due to an increase in the cost of fuel, maintenance, aircraft and aircraft engines and parts, could decrease the amount of cash available to cover the cash obligations. Moreover, the Citicorp credit facility, our amended credit card agreement with Barclays and certain of our other financing arrangements contain minimum cash balance requirements. As a result, we cannot use all of our available cash to fund operations, capital expenditures and cash obligations without violating these requirements.

 

56


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
In the third quarter of 2009, there were no changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from those disclosed in the financial statements and accompanying notes contained in our 2008 Form 10-K except as updated below.
Impairment of Intangible and Other Assets
We assess the impairment of long-lived assets and intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. In addition, our international route authorities and trademark intangible assets are classified as indefinite lived assets and are reviewed for impairment annually. Factors which could trigger an impairment review include the following: significant changes in the manner of use of the assets; significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results; or significant negative industry or economic trends. An impairment has occurred when the future undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those items. Cash flow estimates are based on historical results adjusted to reflect management’s best estimate of future market and operating conditions. The net carrying value of assets not recoverable is reduced to fair value.
Estimates of fair value represent management’s best estimate based on appraisals, industry trends and reference to market rates and transactions. The magnitude of the ongoing impact of the weakened economic environment remains uncertain. Changes in industry capacity and demand for air transportation can significantly impact the fair value of intangible assets, aircraft and related assets which in turn could result in future non-cash impairment charges.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162.” SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. Effective July 1, 2009, the Codification superseded all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP’) Accounting Principle Board (“APB”) 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement),” as adopted by the Codification on July 1, 2009. FSP APB 14-1 applies to convertible debt instruments that, by their stated terms, may be settled in cash (or other assets) upon conversion, including partial cash settlement of the conversion option. FSP APB 14-1 requires bifurcation of the instrument into a debt component that is initially recorded at fair value and an equity component. The difference between the fair value of the debt component and the initial proceeds from issuance of the instrument is recorded as a component of equity. The liability component of the debt instrument is accreted to par using the effective yield method; accretion is reported as a component of interest expense. The equity component is not subsequently re-valued as long as it continues to qualify for equity treatment. FSP APB 14-1 must be applied retrospectively to previously issued cash-settleable convertible instruments as well as prospectively to newly issued instruments. FSP APB 14-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
In September 2005, we issued a total of $144 million principal amount of 7% Senior Convertible Notes due 2020 (the “7% notes”). As of September 30, 2009, $74 million of principal amount remained outstanding under the 7% notes. The holders of these notes may convert, at any time prior to the earlier of the business day prior to the redemption date and the second business day preceding the maturity date, any outstanding notes (or portions thereof) into shares of our common stock, at an initial conversion rate of 41.4508 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $24.12 per share). In lieu of delivery of shares of common stock upon conversion of all or any portion of the 7% notes, we may elect to pay cash or a combination of shares and cash to holders surrendering notes for conversion. The 7% notes are subject to the provisions of FSP APB 14-1 since the 7% notes can be settled in cash upon conversion.

 

57


Table of Contents

We adopted FSP APB 14-1 on January 1, 2009. We concluded that the fair value of the equity component of the 7% notes at the time of issuance in 2005 was $47 million. Upon retrospective application, the adoption resulted in a $29 million increase in accumulated deficit at December 31, 2008, comprised of non-cash interest expense of $17 million for the years 2005-2008 and non-cash losses on debt extinguishment of $12 million related to the partial conversion of certain of the 7% notes to common stock in 2006. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the carrying value of the equity component was $40 million. The principal amount of the outstanding notes, the unamortized discount and the net carrying value at September 30, 2009 was $74 million, $7 million and $67 million, respectively, and at December 31, 2008 was $74 million, $11 million and $63 million, respectively. The remaining period over which the unamortized discount will be recognized is one year. We recognized $1 million and $4 million in non-cash interest expense in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and $1 million and $3 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, related to the adoption of FSP APB 14-1. In addition, we recognized $2 million and $4 million in cash interest expense in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and $2 million and $4 million in cash interest expense in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. The following table presents the December 31, 2008 balance sheet line items affected as adjusted and as originally reported (in millions).
                 
    December 31, 2008  
    As Adjusted     As Reported  
Long-term debt and capital leases, net of current maturities
  $ 3,623     $ 3,634  
Additional paid-in capital
    1,789       1,749  
Accumulated deficit
    (2,336 )     (2,307 )
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments,” as adopted by the Codification on July 1, 2009. This FSP changes existing guidance for determining whether an impairment of debt securities is other-than-temporary. The FSP requires other-than-temporary impairments to be separated into the amount representing the decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from a security (referred to as credit losses) which is recognized in earnings and the amount related to other factors (referred to as noncredit losses) which is recognized in other comprehensive income. This noncredit loss component of the impairment may only be classified in other comprehensive income if both of the following conditions are met (a) the holder of the security concludes that it does not intend to sell the security and (b) the holder concludes that it is more likely than not that the holder will not be required to sell the security before the security recovers its value. If these conditions are not met, the noncredit loss must also be recognized in earnings. When adopting the FSP, an entity is required to record a cumulative effect adjustment as of the beginning of the period of adoption to reclassify the noncredit component of a previously recognized other-than-temporary impairment from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 as of April 1, 2009. We do not meet the conditions necessary to recognize the noncredit loss component of our auction rate securities in other comprehensive income. Accordingly, we did not reclassify any previously recognized other-than-temporary impairment losses from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income and the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 had no material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly,” as adopted by the Codification on July 1, 2009. This FSP provides additional guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. The FSP also provides additional guidance on circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted FSP FAS 157-4 during the second quarter of 2009, and its application had no impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” as adopted by the Codification on July 1, 2009, which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 provides guidance on the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. We adopted SFAS No. 165 during the second quarter of 2009, and its application had no impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements. We evaluated subsequent events through the date the accompanying financial statements were issued, which was October 21, 2009.

 

58


Table of Contents

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46(R),” which changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another entity is based on, among other things, the other entity’s purpose and design and the reporting entity’s ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact the other entity’s economic performance. SFAS No. 167 will require a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A reporting entity will be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects the reporting entity’s financial statements. SFAS No. 167 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 167 and has not yet determined the impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) — Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements.” ASU No. 2009-13 addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which is based on: (a) vendor-specific objective evidence; (b) third-party evidence; or (c) estimates. This guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. In addition, this guidance significantly expands required disclosures related to a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. ASU No. 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and early adoption is permitted. A company may elect, but will not be required, to adopt the amendments in ASU No. 2009-13 retrospectively for all prior periods. Management is currently evaluating the requirements of ASU No. 2009-13 and has not yet determined the impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

59


Table of Contents

Item 3.  
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market Risk Sensitive Instruments
Our primary market risk exposures include commodity price risk (i.e., the price paid to obtain aviation fuel) and interest rate risk. Our exposure to market risk from changes in commodity prices and interest rates has not changed materially from our exposure discussed in our 2008 Form 10-K except as updated below.
Commodity price risk
Our 2009 forecasted mainline and Express fuel consumption is approximately 1.42 billion gallons, and a one cent per gallon increase in aviation fuel price results in a $14 million annual increase in expense. Since the third quarter of 2008, we have not entered into any new transactions as part of our fuel hedging program and as of September 30, 2009, there were no remaining outstanding fuel hedging contracts.
Interest rate risk
Our exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to our cash equivalents, investment portfolios and variable rate debt obligations. At September 30, 2009, our variable-rate long-term debt obligations of approximately $3.38 billion represented approximately 70% of our total long-term debt. If interest rates increased 10% in 2009, the impact on our results of operations would be approximately $12 million of additional interest expense.
At September 30, 2009, included within our investment portfolio are $411 million par value of investments in auction rate securities. With the liquidity issues experienced in the global credit and capital markets, all of our auction rate securities have experienced failed auctions since August 2007. The estimated fair value of these auction rate securities no longer approximates par value. As of September 30, 2009, the fair value of our auction rate securities was $228 million. We continue to monitor the market for auction rate securities and consider its impact (if any) on the fair value of our investments. If the current market conditions deteriorate, we may be required to record additional impairment charges in other nonoperating expense, net in future periods.
We believe that, based on our current unrestricted cash and cash equivalents balance at September 30, 2009, the current lack of liquidity in our investments in auction rate securities will not have a material impact on our liquidity, our cash flow or our ability to fund our operations. Refer to Note 8, “Investments in Marketable Securities (Noncurrent)” in Part I, Items 1A and 1B, respectively, of this report for additional information.

 

60


Table of Contents

Item 4.  
Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of US Airways Group’s and US Airways’ management, including the Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the rules promulgated under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2009. Based on that evaluation, our management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2009.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
There has been no change to US Airways Group’s or US Airways’ internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, US Airways Group’s or US Airways’ internal control over financial reporting.
Limitation on the effectiveness of controls.
We believe that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and the CEO and CFO believe that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the “reasonable assurance” level as of September 30, 2009.

 

61


Table of Contents

Part II. Other Information
Item 1.  
Legal Proceedings
On September 12, 2004, US Airways Group and its domestic subsidiaries (collectively, the “Reorganized Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division (Case Nos. 04-13819-SSM through 03-13823-SSM) (the “2004 Bankruptcy”). On September 16, 2005, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order confirming the plan of reorganization submitted by the Reorganized Debtors and on September 27, 2005, the Reorganized Debtors emerged from the 2004 Bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Court’s order confirming the plan included a provision called the plan injunction, which forever bars other parties from pursuing most claims against the Reorganized Debtors that arose prior to September 27, 2005 in any forum other than the Bankruptcy Court. The great majority of these claims are pre-petition claims that, if paid out at all, will be paid out in common stock of the post-bankruptcy US Airways Group at a fraction of the actual claim amount.
The Company and/or its subsidiaries are defendants in various pending lawsuits and proceedings, and from time to time are subject to other claims arising in the normal course of our business, many of which are covered in whole or in part by insurance. The outcome of those matters cannot be predicted with certainty at this time, but the Company, having consulted with outside counsel, believes that the ultimate disposition of these contingencies will not materially affect its consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Item 1A.  
Risk Factors
Below are a series of risk factors that may affect our results of operations or financial performance. We caution the reader that these risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate in a continually changing business environment, and new risk factors emerge from time to time. Management cannot predict such new risk factors, nor can it assess the impact, if any, of these risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may impact our business.
Risk Factors Relating to the Company and Industry Related Risks
US Airways Group could experience significant operating losses in the future.
There are several reasons, including those addressed in these risk factors, why US Airways Group might fail to achieve profitability and might experience significant losses. In particular, the weakened condition of the economy and the high volatility of fuel prices have had and continue to have an impact on our operating results, and overall worsening economic conditions increase the risk that we will experience losses.
Downturns in economic conditions adversely affect our business.
Due to the discretionary nature of business and leisure travel spending, airline industry revenues are heavily influenced by the condition of the U.S. economy and the economies in other regions of the world. Unfavorable conditions in these broader economies have resulted in decreased passenger demand for air travel and changes in booking practices, both of which in turn have had a strong negative effect on our revenues. In addition, during challenging economic times, actions by our competitors to increase their revenues can have an adverse impact on our revenues. See “The airline industry is intensely competitive and dynamic” below. Certain contractual obligations limit our ability to reduce the number of aircraft in operation below certain levels. As a result, we may not be able to optimize the number of aircraft in operation in response to a decrease in passenger demand for air travel.
Increased costs of financing, a reduction in the availability of financing and fluctuations in interest rates could adversely affect our liquidity, operating expenses and results.
Recent global market and economic conditions have been unprecedented and challenging with tighter credit conditions. Continued concerns about the systemic impact of inflation, the availability and cost of credit, energy costs and geopolitical issues, combined with declining business activity levels and consumer confidence, increased unemployment and volatile oil prices, have contributed to unprecedented levels of volatility in the capital markets. As a result of these market conditions, the cost and availability of credit have been and may continue to be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit spreads. These changes in the domestic and global financial markets may increase our costs of financing and adversely affect our ability to obtain financing needed for the acquisition of aircraft that we have contractual commitments to purchase and for other types of financings we may seek in order to raise capital or fund other types of obligations. Any downgrades to our credit rating may likewise increase the cost and reduce the availability of financings.
In addition, we have substantial non-cancelable commitments for capital expenditures, including the acquisition of new aircraft and related spare engines. Although we have in place backstop financing for the narrow body aircraft we have on order, we have not yet secured financing commitments or backstop financing for some of the widebody aircraft we have on order, commencing with deliveries scheduled for March 2010, and cannot assure you of the availability or cost of that financing. If we are not able to arrange financing for such aircraft at customary advance rates and on terms and conditions acceptable to us, we expect we would seek to negotiate deferrals of aircraft deliveries with the manufacturer or financing at lower than customary advance rates, or, if required, use cash from operations or other sources to purchase the aircraft.

 

62


Table of Contents

Further, a substantial portion of our indebtedness bears interest at fluctuating interest rates. These are primarily based on the London interbank offered rate for deposits of U.S. dollars, or “LIBOR.” LIBOR tends to fluctuate based on general economic conditions, general interest rates, federal reserve rates and the supply of and demand for credit in the London interbank market. We have not hedged our interest rate exposure and, accordingly, our interest expense for any particular period may fluctuate based on LIBOR and other variable interest rates. To the extent these interest rates increase, our interest expense will increase, in which event we may have difficulties making interest payments and funding our other fixed costs, and our available cash flow for general corporate requirements may be adversely affected. See also the discussion of interest rate risk in Part I, Item 3, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
Our high level of fixed obligations limits our ability to fund general corporate requirements and obtain additional financing, limits our flexibility in responding to competitive developments and increases our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions.
We have a significant amount of fixed obligations, including debt, aircraft leases and financings, aircraft purchase commitments, leases and developments of airport and other facilities and other cash obligations. We also have certain guaranteed costs associated with our regional alliances. Our existing indebtedness is secured by substantially all of our assets.
As a result of the substantial fixed costs associated with these obligations:
   
a decrease in revenues results in a disproportionately greater percentage decrease in earnings;
   
we may not have sufficient liquidity to fund all of these fixed costs if our revenues decline or costs increase; and
   
we may have to use our working capital to fund these fixed costs instead of funding general corporate requirements, including capital expenditures.
These obligations also impact our ability to obtain additional financing, if needed, and our flexibility in the conduct of our business.
Any failure to comply with the liquidity covenants contained in our financing arrangements would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The terms of our Citicorp credit facility and certain of our other financing arrangements require us to maintain consolidated unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of not less than $850 million, with not less than $750 million (subject to partial reductions upon certain reductions in the outstanding principal amount of the loan) of that amount held in accounts subject to control agreements.
Our ability to comply with these covenants while paying the fixed costs associated with our contractual obligations and our other expenses will depend on our operating performance and cash flow, which are seasonal, as well as factors including fuel costs and general economic and political conditions.
In order to strengthen our ability to continue complying with our liquidity covenants in the event that the factors affecting our liquidity will in fact be more adverse than we currently anticipate, management is pursuing a number of initiatives. These initiatives are intended to provide a cushion to mitigate against such an event. There can be no assurance that these initiatives will be consummated, however, and even if these initiatives are consummated, the factors affecting our liquidity (and our ability to comply with related covenants) will remain subject to significant fluctuations and uncertainties, many of which are outside our control. Any breach of our liquidity covenants or failure to timely pay our obligations could result in a variety of adverse consequences, including the acceleration of our indebtedness, the withholding of credit card proceeds by the credit card servicers and the exercise of remedies by our creditors and lessors. In such a situation, it is unlikely that we would be able to fulfill our contractual obligations, repay the accelerated indebtedness, make required lease payments or otherwise cover our fixed costs.
Our business is dependent on the price and availability of aircraft fuel. Continued periods of high volatility in fuel costs, increased fuel prices and significant disruptions in the supply of aircraft fuel could have a significant negative impact on our operating results and liquidity.
Our operating results are significantly impacted by changes in the availability, price volatility and the cost of aircraft fuel, which represents the largest single cost item in our business. Fuel prices have fluctuated substantially over the past several years and sharply in the last year.

 

63


Table of Contents

Because of the amount of fuel needed to operate our airline, even a relatively small increase in the price of fuel can have a significant adverse aggregate effect on our costs and liquidity. Due to the competitive nature of the airline industry and unpredictability of the market, we can offer no assurance that we may be able to increase our fares, impose fuel surcharges or otherwise increase revenues sufficiently to offset fuel prices.
Although we are currently able to obtain adequate supplies of aircraft fuel, we cannot predict the future availability, price volatility or cost of aircraft fuel. Natural disasters, political disruptions or wars involving oil-producing countries, changes in fuel-related governmental policy, the strength of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies, speculation in the energy futures markets, changes in aircraft fuel production capacity, environmental concerns and other unpredictable events may result in fuel supply shortages, additional fuel price volatility and cost increases in the future.
Historically from time to time we have entered into hedging arrangements to protect against rising fuel costs. Since the third quarter of 2008, we have not entered into any new hedging transactions as part of our fuel hedging program and as of September 30, 2009, there were no remaining outstanding fuel hedging contracts. Our ability to hedge in the future, however, may be limited, particularly if the financial condition of our airline worsens. In the event we do hedge in the future, our fuel hedging arrangements do not completely protect us against price increases and are limited in both volume of fuel and duration. Also, a rapid decline in the price of fuel can adversely impact our short-term liquidity as our hedge counterparties require that we post collateral in the form of cash or letters of credit when the projected future market price of fuel drops below the strike price. See also the discussion in Part I, Item 3, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
If our financial condition worsens, provisions in our credit card processing and other commercial agreements may adversely affect our liquidity.
We have agreements with companies that process customer credit card transactions for the sale of air travel and other services. These agreements allow these processing companies, under certain conditions, to hold an amount of our cash (referred to as a “holdback”) equal to a portion of advance ticket sales that have been processed by that company, but for which we have not yet provided the air transportation. These holdback requirements can be modified at the discretion of the processing companies upon the occurrence of specific events, including material adverse changes in our financial condition. An increase in the current holdback balances to higher percentages up to and including 100% of relevant advanced ticket sales could materially reduce our liquidity. Likewise, other of our commercial agreements contain provisions that allow other entities to impose less favorable terms, including the acceleration of amounts due, in the event of material adverse changes in our financial condition.
Union disputes, employee strikes and other labor-related disruptions may adversely affect our operations.
Relations between air carriers and labor unions in the United States are governed by the Railway Labor Act (the “RLA”). Under the RLA, collective bargaining agreements generally contain “amendable dates” rather than expiration dates, and the RLA requires that a carrier maintain the existing terms and conditions of employment following the amendable date through a multi-stage and usually lengthy series of bargaining processes overseen by the National Mediation Board. These processes do not apply to our current and ongoing negotiations for post-merger integrated labor agreements, and this means unions may not lawfully engage in concerted refusals to work, such as strikes, slow-downs, sick-outs or other similar activity, against us. Nonetheless, after more than four years of negotiations without a resolution to the bargaining issues that arose from the merger, there is a risk that disgruntled employees, either with or without union involvement, could engage in one or more concerted refusals to work that could individually or collectively harm the operation of our airline and impair our financial performance. Likewise, employees represented by unions that have reached post-merger integrated agreements could engage in improper actions that disrupt our operations.
If we incur problems with any of our third party service providers, our operations could be adversely affected by a resulting decline in revenue or negative public perception about our services.
Our reliance upon others to provide essential services on behalf of our operations may result in our relative inability to control the efficiency and timeliness of contract services. We have entered into agreements with contractors to provide various facilities and services required for our operations, including Express flight operations, aircraft maintenance, ground services and facilities, reservations and baggage handling. Similar agreements may be entered into in any new markets we decide to serve. These agreements are generally subject to termination after notice by the third party service provider. We are also at risk should one of these service providers cease operations, and there is no guarantee that we could replace these providers on a timely basis with comparably priced providers. Recent volatility in fuel prices, disruptions to capital markets and the current economic downturn in general have subjected certain of these third party service providers to strong financial pressures. Any material problems with the efficiency and timeliness of contract services, resulting from financial hardships or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

64


Table of Contents

We rely heavily on automated systems to operate our business and any failure or disruption of these systems could harm our business.
To operate our business, we depend on automated systems, including our computerized airline reservation systems, flight operations systems, telecommunication systems, airport customer self-service kiosks and websites. Our website and reservation systems must be able to accommodate a high volume of traffic and deliver important flight information on a timely and reliable basis. Substantial or repeated disruptions or failures of any of these automated systems could impair our operations, reduce the attractiveness of our services and could result in lost revenues and increased costs. In addition, these automated systems require periodic maintenance, upgrades and replacements, and our business may be harmed if we fail to properly maintain, upgrade or replace such systems.
The integration of our business units following the merger continues to present significant challenges.
We continue to face significant challenges relating to our merger in consolidating functions and integrating diverse organizations, information technology systems, processes, procedures, operations and training and maintenance programs, in a timely and efficient manner. This integration has been and will continue to be costly, complex and time consuming. Failure to successfully complete the integration may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Changes to our business model that are designed to increase revenues may not be successful and may cause operational difficulties or decreased demand.
We have implemented several new measures designed to increase revenue and offset costs. These measures include charging separately for services that had previously been included within the price of a ticket and increasing other pre-existing fees. We may introduce additional initiatives in the future. We cannot assure you that these new measures or any future initiatives will be successful in increasing our revenues. Additionally, the implementation of these initiatives creates logistical challenges that could harm the operational performance of our airline. Also, the new and increased fees might reduce the demand for air travel on our airline or across the industry in general, particularly as weakening economic conditions make our customers more sensitive to increased travel costs.
The airline industry is intensely competitive and dynamic.
Our competitors include other major domestic airlines as well as foreign, regional and new entrant airlines, some of which have more financial resources or lower cost structures than ours, and other forms of transportation, including rail and private automobiles. In many of our markets we compete with at least one low cost air carrier. Our revenues are sensitive to numerous factors, and the actions of other carriers in the areas of pricing, scheduling and promotions can have a substantial adverse impact not only on our revenues but on overall industry revenues. These factors may become even more significant in periods when the industry experiences large losses, as airlines under financial stress, or in bankruptcy, may institute pricing structures intended to achieve near-term survival rather than long-term viability. In addition, because a significant portion of our traffic is short-haul travel, we are more susceptible than other major airlines to competition from surface transportation such as automobiles and trains.
Low cost carriers have a profound impact on industry revenues. Using the advantage of low unit costs, these carriers offer lower fares, particularly those targeted at business passengers, in order to shift demand from larger, more-established airlines. Some low cost carriers, which have cost structures lower than ours, have better financial performance and significant numbers of aircraft on order for delivery in the next few years. These low-cost carriers are expected to continue to increase their market share through growth and could continue to have an impact on the overall performance of US Airways Group.
Industry consolidation could weaken our competitive position.
If mergers or other forms of industry consolidation including antitrust immunity grants take place, we might or might not be included as a participant. Depending on which carriers combine and which assets, if any, are sold or otherwise transferred to other carriers in connection with such combinations, our competitive position relative to the post-combination carriers or other carriers that acquire such assets could be harmed. In addition, as carriers combine through traditional mergers or antitrust immunity grants, their route networks might grow and result in greater overlap with our network, which in turn could result in lower overall market share and revenues for us. Such consolidation is not limited to the U.S., but could include further consolidation among international carriers in Europe and elsewhere.
The loss of key personnel upon whom we depend to operate our business or the inability to attract additional qualified personnel could adversely affect the results of our operations or our financial performance.
We believe that our future success will depend in large part on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified management, technical and other personnel, particularly in light of reductions in headcount associated with cost-saving measures that we have implemented. We may not be successful in retaining key personnel or in attracting and retaining other highly qualified personnel. Any inability to retain or attract significant numbers of qualified management and other personnel could adversely affect our business.

 

65


Table of Contents

The travel industry continues to face ongoing security concerns.
The attacks of September 11, 2001 and continuing terrorist threats materially impacted and continue to impact air travel. The Aviation and Transportation Security Act mandates improved flight deck security; deployment of federal air marshals on board flights; improved airport perimeter access security; airline crew security training; enhanced security screening of passengers, baggage, cargo, mail, employees and vendors; enhanced training and qualifications of security screening personnel; additional provision of passenger data to U.S. Customs and enhanced background checks. These increased security procedures introduced at airports since the attacks and other such measures as may be introduced in the future generate higher operating costs for airlines. A concurrent increase in airport security charges and procedures, such as restrictions on carry-on baggage, has also had and may continue to have a disproportionate impact on short-haul travel, which constitutes a significant portion of our flying and revenue. We would also be materially impacted in the event of further terrorist attacks or perceived terrorist threats.
Changes in government regulation could increase our operating costs and limit our ability to conduct our business.
Airlines are subject to extensive regulatory requirements. In the last several years, Congress has passed laws, and the DOT, the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”), the Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) and the Department of Homeland Security have issued a number of directives and other regulations. These requirements impose substantial costs on airlines. On October 10, 2008, the FAA finalized new rules governing flight operations at the three major New York airports. These rules did not take effect because of a legal challenge, but the FAA has pushed forward with a reduction in the number of flights per hour at LaGuardia. The FAA is attempting to work with carriers on a voluntary basis to implement its new lower operations cap at LaGuardia. If this is not successful, the FAA may resort to other methods to reduce congestion in New York. Additionally, the DOT recently finalized a policy change that will permit airports to charge differentiated landing fees during congested periods, which could impact our ability to serve certain markets in the future. The new rule is being challenged in court by the industry. The Obama Administration has not yet indicated how it intends to move forward on the issue of congestion management in the New York region.
The FAA from time to time issues directives and other regulations relating to the maintenance and operation of aircraft that require significant expenditures or operational restrictions. Some FAA requirements cover, among other things, retirement of older aircraft, security measures, collision avoidance systems, airborne windshear avoidance systems, noise abatement and other environmental concerns, aircraft operation and safety and increased inspections and maintenance procedures to be conducted on older aircraft. Our failure to timely comply with these requirements can result in fines and other enforcement actions by the FAA or other regulators. For example, on October 14, 2009, the FAA proposed a fine of $5.4 million with respect to certain alleged violations and we are in discussions with the agency regarding resolution of this matter.
Additional laws, regulations, taxes and policies have been proposed or discussed from time to time, including recently introduced federal legislation on a “passenger bill of rights,” that, if adopted, could significantly increase the cost of airline operations or reduce revenues. The state of New York’s attempt to adopt such a measure has been successfully challenged by the airline industry. Other states, however, are contemplating similar legislation. The DOT also has a rulemaking pending and completed a stakeholder task force working on various initiatives that could lead to additional expansion of airline obligations in the customer service area and increase our costs.
Finally, the ability of U.S. carriers to operate international routes is subject to change because the applicable arrangements between the U.S. and foreign governments may be amended from time to time, or because appropriate slots or facilities may not be available. We cannot assure you that laws or regulations enacted in the future will not adversely affect our operating costs. In addition, increased environmental regulation may increase costs or restrict our operations. The EU has been particularly aggressive in this area.
The inability to maintain labor costs at competitive levels could harm our financial performance.
Currently, our labor costs are very competitive. However, we cannot assure you that labor costs going forward will remain competitive because some of our agreements are amendable now and others may become amendable, competitors may significantly reduce their labor costs or we may agree to higher-cost provisions in our current labor negotiations. Approximately 87% of the employees within US Airways Group are represented for collective bargaining purposes by labor unions, including unionized groups of our employees abroad. Some of our unions have brought and may continue to bring grievances to binding arbitration. Unions may also bring court actions and may seek to compel us to engage in the bargaining processes where we believe we have no such obligation. If successful, there is a risk these judicial or arbitral avenues could create additional costs that we did not anticipate.

 

66


Table of Contents

Our ability to operate and grow our route network in the future is dependent on the availability of adequate facilities and infrastructure throughout our system.
In order to operate our existing flight schedule and, where appropriate, add service along new or existing routes, we must be able to obtain adequate gates, ticketing facilities, operations areas, slots (where applicable) and office space. For example, at our largest hub airport, we are seeking to increase international service despite challenging airport space constraints. The nation’s aging air traffic control infrastructure presents challenges as well. The ability of the air traffic control system to handle traffic in high-density areas where we have a large concentration of flights is critical to our ability to operate our existing schedule. Also, as airports around the world become more congested, we cannot always be sure that our plans for new service can be implemented in a commercially viable manner given operating constraints at airports throughout our network.
We are subject to many forms of environmental regulation and may incur substantial costs as a result.
We are subject to increasingly stringent federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations and ordinances relating to the protection of the environment, including those relating to emissions to the air, discharges to surface and subsurface waters, safe drinking water, and the management of hazardous substances, oils and waste materials. Compliance with all environmental laws and regulations can require significant expenditures.
Several U.S. airport authorities are actively engaged in efforts to limit discharges of de-icing fluid (glycol) to local groundwater, often by requiring airlines to participate in the building or reconfiguring of airport de-icing facilities. Such efforts are likely to impose additional costs and restrictions on airlines using those airports. We do not believe, however, that such environmental developments will have a material impact on our capital expenditures or otherwise adversely affect our operations, operating costs or competitive position.
We are also subject to other environmental laws and regulations, including those that require us to remediate soil or groundwater to meet certain objectives. Under federal law, generators of waste materials, and owners or operators of facilities, can be subject to liability for investigation and remediation costs at locations that have been identified as requiring response actions. We have liability for such costs at various sites, although the future costs associated with the remediation efforts are currently not expected to have a material adverse affect on our business.
We have various leases and agreements with respect to real property, tanks and pipelines with airports and other operators. Under these leases and agreements, we have agreed to standard language indemnifying the lessor or operator against environmental liabilities associated with the real property or operations described under the agreement, even if we are not the party responsible for the initial event that caused the environmental damage. We also participate in leases with other airlines in fuel consortiums and fuel committees at airports, where such indemnities are generally joint and several among the participating airlines.
Recently, climate change issues and greenhouse gas emissions (including carbon) have attracted international and domestic regulatory interest that may result in the imposition of additional regulation on airlines. For example, the EU has adopted legislation to include aviation within the EU’s existing greenhouse gas emission trading scheme effective in 2012. Any such regulatory activity in the future may adversely affect our business and financial results.
California is in the process of implementing environmental provisions aimed at limiting emissions from motorized vehicles, which may include some airline belt loaders and tugs and require a change of ground service vehicles. The future costs associated with replacing some or all of our ground fleets in California cities are currently not expected to have a material adverse affect on our business.
Governmental authorities in several U.S. and foreign cities are also considering or have already implemented aircraft noise reduction programs, including the imposition of nighttime curfews and limitations on daytime take-offs and landings. We have been able to accommodate local noise restrictions imposed to date, but our operations could be adversely affected if locally-imposed regulations become more restrictive or widespread.
Ongoing data security compliance requirements could increase our costs, and any significant data breach could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our business requires the appropriate and secure utilization of customer and other sensitive information. We cannot be certain that advances in criminal capabilities, discovery of new vulnerabilities, attempts to exploit existing vulnerabilities in our systems, data thefts, physical system or network break-ins or inappropriate access, or other developments will not compromise or breach the technology protecting the networks that access and store database information. Furthermore, there has been heightened legislative and regulatory focus on data security in the U.S. and abroad (particularly in the EU), including requirements for varying levels of customer notification in the event of a data breach.
Many of our commercial partners, including credit card companies, have imposed certain data security standards that we must meet. In particular, we were required by the Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council, founded by the credit card companies, to comply with their highest level of data security standards. While we currently meet these standards, new and revised standards may be imposed that may be difficult for us to meet.

 

67


Table of Contents

In addition to the Payment Card Industry Standards discussed above, failure to comply with the other privacy and data use and security requirements of our partners or related laws and regulations to which we are subject may expose us to fines, sanctions or other penalties, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and overall business. In addition, failure to address appropriately these issues could also give rise to additional legal risks, which, in turn, could increase the size and number of litigation claims and damages asserted or subject us to enforcement actions, fines and penalties and cause us to incur further related costs and expenses.
Interruptions or disruptions in service at one of our hub airports could have a material adverse impact on our operations.
We operate principally through primary hubs in Charlotte, Philadelphia and Phoenix and focus cities in New York, Washington, D.C., Boston and Las Vegas. A majority of our flights either originate in or fly into one of these locations. A significant interruption or disruption in service at one of our hubs could result in the cancellation or delay of a significant portion of our flights and, as a result, could have a severe impact on our business, operations and financial performance.
We are at risk of losses and adverse publicity stemming from any accident involving any of our aircraft.
If one of our aircraft were to be involved in an accident, we could be exposed to significant tort liability. The insurance we carry to cover damages arising from any future accidents may be inadequate. In the event that our insurance is not adequate, we may be forced to bear substantial losses from an accident. In addition, any accident involving an aircraft that we operate could create a public perception that our aircraft are not safe or reliable, which could harm our reputation, result in air travelers being reluctant to fly on our aircraft and adversely impact our financial condition and operations.
Delays in scheduled aircraft deliveries or other loss of anticipated fleet capacity may adversely impact our operations and financial results.
The success of our business depends on, among other things, the ability to operate a certain number and type of aircraft. In many cases, the aircraft we intend to operate are not yet in our fleet, but we have contractual commitments to purchase or lease them. If for any reason we were unable to secure deliveries of new aircraft on contractually scheduled delivery dates, this could have a negative impact on our business, operations and financial performance. Our failure to integrate newly purchased aircraft into our fleet as planned might require us to seek extensions of the terms for some leased aircraft. Such unanticipated extensions may require us to operate existing aircraft beyond the point at which it is economically optimal to retire them, resulting in increased maintenance costs. If new aircraft orders are not filled on a timely basis, we could face higher monthly rental rates.
Our business is subject to weather factors and seasonal variations in airline travel, which cause our results to fluctuate.
Our operations are vulnerable to severe weather conditions in parts of our network that could disrupt service, create air traffic control problems, decrease revenue and increase costs, such as during hurricane season in the Caribbean and Southeast United States, snow and severe winters in the Northeast United States and thunderstorms in the Eastern United States. In addition, the air travel business historically fluctuates on a seasonal basis. Due to the greater demand for air and leisure travel during the summer months, revenues in the airline industry in the second and third quarters of the year tend to be greater than revenues in the first and fourth quarters of the year. Our results of operations will likely reflect weather factors and seasonality, and therefore quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of those for an entire year, and our prior results are not necessarily indicative of our future results.
Increases in insurance costs or reductions in insurance coverage may adversely impact our operations and financial results.
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 led to a significant increase in insurance premiums and a decrease in the insurance coverage available to commercial air carriers. Accordingly, our insurance costs increased significantly and our ability to continue to obtain insurance even at current prices remains uncertain. In addition, we have obtained third party war risk (terrorism) insurance through a special program administered by the FAA, resulting in lower premiums than if we had obtained this insurance in the commercial insurance market. The program has been extended, with the same conditions and premiums, until August 31, 2010. If the federal insurance program terminates, we would likely face a material increase in the cost of war risk insurance. The failure of one or more of our insurers could result in a lack of coverage for a period of time. Additionally, severe disruptions in the domestic and global financial markets could adversely impact the ratings and survival of some insurers. Future downgrades in the ratings of enough insurers could adversely impact both the availability of appropriate insurance coverage and its cost. Because of competitive pressures in our industry, our ability to pass additional insurance costs to passengers is limited. As a result, further increases in insurance costs or reductions in available insurance coverage could have an adverse impact on our financial results.

 

68


Table of Contents

We may be adversely affected by global events that affect travel behavior.
Our revenue and results of operations may be adversely affected by global events beyond our control. Acts of terrorism, wars or other military conflicts, including the war in Iraq, may depress air travel, particularly on international routes. An outbreak of a contagious disease such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (“SARS”), avian flu, or any other influenza-type illness, if it were to persist for an extended period, could again materially affect the airline industry and us by reducing revenues and impacting travel behavior. For example, the recent outbreak of the “swine flu,” or H1N1 influenza virus, has caused a decline in the demand of our flights to and from Mexico.
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
As we expand our international operations, we will have significant operating revenues and expenses, as well as assets and liabilities, denominated in foreign currencies. Fluctuations in foreign currencies can significantly affect our operating performance and the value of our assets and liabilities located outside of the United States.
The use of US Airways Group’s NOLs and certain other tax attributes could be limited in the future.
From the time of the merger until the first half of 2007, a significant portion of US Airways Group’s common stock was beneficially owned by a small number of equity investors. Since the merger, some of the equity investors have sold portions of their holdings and other investors have purchased US Airways Group stock, and, as a result, we believe an “ownership change” as defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 382 occurred for US Airways Group in February 2007. When a company undergoes such an ownership change, Section 382 limits the future ability to utilize any net operating losses, or NOL, generated before the ownership change and certain subsequently recognized “built-in” losses and deductions, if any, existing as of the date of the ownership change. A company’s ability to utilize new NOL arising after the ownership change is not affected. Since February 2007 there have been additional changes in the ownership of US Airways Group that, if combined with sufficiently large future changes in ownership, could result in another “ownership change” as defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 382. Until US Airways Group has used all of its existing NOL, future shifts in ownership of US Airways Group’s common stock could result in a new Section 382 limit on our NOL as of the date of an additional ownership change. For purposes of determining if an ownership change has occurred, the right to convert convertible notes into stock may be treated as if US Airways Group had issued the underlying stock.
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
Our common stock has limited trading history and its market price may be volatile.
Our common stock began trading on the NYSE on September 27, 2005. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:
   
our operating results failing to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors;
   
changes in financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;
   
material announcements by us or our competitors;
   
movements in fuel prices;
   
new regulatory pronouncements and changes in regulatory guidelines;
   
general and industry-specific economic conditions;
   
public sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock; and
   
general market conditions.
Conversion of our convertible notes will dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
The conversion of some or all of US Airways Group’s 7% senior convertible notes due 2020 or 7.25% convertible senior notes due 2014 will dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders. Any sales in the public market of the common stock issuable upon such conversion could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock. In addition, the existence of the convertible notes may encourage short selling by market participants because the conversion of the notes could depress the price of our common stock.

 

69


Table of Contents

Certain provisions of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws of US Airways Group make it difficult for stockholders to change the composition of our board of directors and may discourage takeover attempts that some of our stockholders might consider beneficial.
Certain provisions of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws of US Airways Group may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control if our board of directors determines that such changes in control are not in the best interests of US Airways Group and its stockholders. These provisions include, among other things, the following:
   
a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms;
   
advance notice procedures for stockholder proposals to be considered at stockholders’ meetings;
   
the ability of US Airways Group’s board of directors to fill vacancies on the board;
   
a prohibition against stockholders taking action by written consent;
   
a prohibition against stockholders calling special meetings of stockholders;
   
a requirement that holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the shares entitled to vote in the election of directors approve amendment of the amended and restated bylaws; and
   
super-majority voting requirements to modify or amend specified provisions of US Airways Group’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation.
These provisions are not intended to prevent a takeover, but are intended to protect and maximize the value of US Airways Group’s stockholders’ interests. While these provisions have the effect of encouraging persons seeking to acquire control of our company to negotiate with our board of directors, they could enable our board of directors to prevent a transaction that some, or a majority, of our stockholders might believe to be in their best interests and, in that case, may prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent directors. In addition, US Airways Group is subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits business combinations with interested stockholders. Interested stockholders do not include stockholders, such as our equity investors at the time of the merger, whose acquisition of US Airways Group’s securities is approved by the board of directors prior to the investment under Section 203.
Our charter documents include provisions limiting voting and ownership of our equity interests, which includes our common stock and our convertible notes, by foreign owners.
Our charter documents provide that, consistent with the requirements of Subtitle VII of Title 49 of the United States Code, as amended, or as the same may be from time to time amended (the “Aviation Act”), any person or entity who is not a “citizen of the United States” (as defined under the Aviation Act and administrative interpretations issued by the Department of Transportation, its predecessors and successors, from time to time), including any agent, trustee or representative of such person or entity (a “non-citizen”), shall not own (beneficially or of record) and/or control more than (a) 24.9% of the aggregate votes of all of our outstanding equity securities (as defined, which definition includes our capital stock, securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our capital stock, including our outstanding convertible notes, and any options, warrants or other rights to acquire capital stock) (the “voting cap amount”) or (b) 49.9% of our outstanding equity securities (the “absolute cap amount”). If non-citizens nonetheless at any time own and/or control more than the voting cap amount, the voting rights of the equity securities in excess of the voting cap amount shall be automatically suspended in accordance with the provisions of our bylaws. Voting rights of equity securities, if any, owned (beneficially or of record) by non-citizens shall be suspended in reverse chronological order based upon the date of registration in the foreign stock record. Further, if at any time a transfer of equity securities to a non-citizen would result in non-citizens owning more than the absolute cap amount, such transfer shall be void and of no effect, in accordance with provisions of our bylaws. Certificates for our equity securities must bear a legend set forth in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation stating that such equity securities are subject to the foregoing restrictions. Under our bylaws, it is the duty of each stockholder who is a non-citizen to register his, her or its equity securities on our foreign stock record. In addition, our bylaws provide that in the event that non-citizens shall own (beneficially or of record) or have voting control over any equity securities, the voting rights of such persons shall be subject to automatic suspension to the extent required to ensure that we are in compliance with applicable provisions of law and regulations relating to ownership or control of a United States air carrier. In the event that we determine that the equity securities registered on the foreign stock record or the stock records of the Company exceed the absolute cap amount, sufficient shares shall be removed from the foreign stock record and the stock records of the Company so that the number of shares entered therein does not exceed the absolute cap amount. Shares of equity securities shall be removed from the foreign stock record and the stock records of the Company in reverse chronological order based on the date of registration in the foreign stock record and the stock records of the Company.

 

70


Table of Contents

Item 6.  
Exhibits
         
Exhibit No.   Description
       
 
  2.1    
Mutual Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of August 11, 2009 among Delta Air Lines, Inc., US Airways, Inc. and US Airways Group, Inc.*
       
 
  3.1    
Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of US Airways Group, Inc., effective as of July 24, 2009.
       
 
  10.1    
Amendment No. 4 to the Amended and Restated Airbus A320 Family Aircraft Purchase Agreement dated as of October 2, 2007 between Airbus S.A.S. and US Airways, Inc.*
       
 
  10.2    
Amendment No. 4 to the A330 Purchase Agreement dated as of October 2, 2007 between Airbus S.A.S. and US Airways, Inc.*
       
 
  10.3    
Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and Restated Airbus A350 XWB Purchase Agreement dated as of October 2, 2007 between Airbus S.A.S. and US Airways, Inc.*
       
 
  10.4    
Amendment No. 8 to America West Co-Branded Card Agreement dated September 17, 2009 by and between US Airways Group, Inc. and Barclays Bank Delaware.*
       
 
  10.5    
Amendment No. 9 to America West Co-Branded Card Agreement dated September 21, 2009 by and between US Airways Group, Inc. and Barclays Bank Delaware.*
       
 
  31.1    
Certification of US Airways Group’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
       
 
  31.2    
Certification of US Airways Group’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
       
 
  31.3    
Certification of US Airways’ Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
       
 
  31.4    
Certification of US Airways’ Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
       
 
  32.1    
Certification of US Airways Group’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  32.2    
Certification of US Airways’ Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
     
*  
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted under a request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

71


Table of Contents

Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  US Airways Group, Inc. (Registrant)
 
 
Date: October 21, 2009  By:   /s/ Derek J. Kerr    
    Derek J. Kerr   
    Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) 
 
 
  US Airways, Inc. (Registrant)
 
 
Date: October 21, 2009  By:   /s/ Derek J. Kerr    
    Derek J. Kerr   
    Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
 

 

72


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index
         
Exhibit No.   Description
       
 
  2.1    
Mutual Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of August 11, 2009 among Delta Air Lines, Inc., US Airways, Inc. and US Airways Group, Inc.*
       
 
  3.1    
Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of US Airways Group, Inc., effective as of July 24, 2009.
       
 
  10.1    
Amendment No. 4 to the Amended and Restated Airbus A320 Family Aircraft Purchase Agreement dated as of October 2, 2007 between Airbus S.A.S. and US Airways, Inc.*
       
 
  10.2    
Amendment No. 4 to the A330 Purchase Agreement dated as of October 2, 2007 between Airbus S.A.S. and US Airways, Inc.*
       
 
  10.3    
Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and Restated Airbus A350 XWB Purchase Agreement dated as of October 2, 2007 between Airbus S.A.S. and US Airways, Inc.*
       
 
  10.4    
Amendment No. 8 to America West Co-Branded Card Agreement dated September 17, 2009 by and between US Airways Group, Inc. and Barclays Bank Delaware.*
       
 
  10.5    
Amendment No. 9 to America West Co-Branded Card Agreement dated September 21, 2009 by and between US Airways Group, Inc. and Barclays Bank Delaware.*
       
 
  31.1    
Certification of US Airways Group’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
       
 
  31.2    
Certification of US Airways Group’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
       
 
  31.3    
Certification of US Airways’ Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
       
 
  31.4    
Certification of US Airways’ Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
       
 
  32.1    
Certification of US Airways Group’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  32.2    
Certification of US Airways’ Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
     
*  
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted under a request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

73