LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

Supplement Dated April 28, 2021

To the following Prospectuses, as supplemented

CONSULTANT SOLUTIONS (CLASSIC, PLUS, ELITE, SELECT) PROSPECTUS DATED APRIL 29, 2019

CONSULTANT I PROSPECTUS DATED APRIL 29, 2019

LBL ADVANTAGE PROSPECTUS DATED MAY 1, 2004

CONSULTANT II PROSPECTUS DATED MAY 1, 2004

PREMIER PLANNER PROSPECTUS DATED MAY 1, 2004

The following information supplements the prospectus for your variable annuity contract issued by Lincoln Benefit Life Company.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ABOUT

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

INDEX

1

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE RISK FACTORS

This document contains “forward-looking statements” that anticipate results based on our estimates, assumptions and plans that are subject to uncertainty. These statements are made subject to the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events or developments.

These forward-looking statements do not relate strictly to historical or current facts and may be identified by their use of words like “plans,” “seeks,” “expects,” “will,” “should,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “believes,” “likely,” “targets” and other words with similar meanings. These statements may address, among other things, our strategy for growth, investment results, regulatory approvals, market position, expenses, financial results, litigation and reserves. We believe that these statements are based on reasonable estimates, assumptions and plans. However, if the estimates, assumptions or plans underlying the forward-looking statements prove inaccurate or if other risks or uncertainties arise, actual results could differ materially from those communicated in these forward-looking statements.

In addition to the normal risks of business, we are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including those listed below, which apply to us as an insurer. These risks constitute our cautionary statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and readers should carefully review such cautionary statements as they identify certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements and historical trends. These cautionary statements are not exclusive and are in addition to other factors discussed elsewhere in this document, in our filings with the SEC or in materials incorporated therein by reference.

Changes in actual experience could materially and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition.

Our liability pricing includes long-term assumptions regarding investment returns, mortality, morbidity, persistency and operating costs and expenses of our business. We establish target returns based upon these factors and the average amount of capital that we must hold to support in-force contracts taking into account rating agencies and regulatory requirements. Profitability emerges over a period of years depending on the nature and life of the product and is subject to variability as actual results may differ from pricing assumptions. Additionally, many of our products have fixed or guaranteed terms that limit our ability to increase revenues or reduce benefits, including credited interest, once the product has been issued.

Our financial condition depends in part on the adequacy of investment spreads, the management of market and credit risks associated with investments, the sufficiency of premiums and contract charges to cover mortality and morbidity benefits, the persistency of policies, and the management of operating costs and expenses within anticipated pricing allowances. We may face losses if there are significant deviations from our assumptions regarding the future persistency of our insurance policies and annuity contracts. The prices and expected future profitability of our life insurance, deferred annuity and long-term care products are based in part upon assumptions related to persistency. Economic and market dislocations may occur and future consumer persistency behaviors could vary materially from the past. The effect of persistency on profitability varies for different products. For example, continued activity in the viatical, stranger-owned, and/or life settlement industry could cause the Company’s level of lapses to differ from its assumptions, which could negatively impact the Company’s financial condition and cash flow. Assumptions and estimates involve judgment, and by their nature are imprecise and subject to changes and revisions over time. Accordingly, the Company’s results may be affected, positively or negatively, from time to time, by actual results differing from assumptions by changes in estimates, and by changes resulting from implementing new systems and procedures that facilitate the calculation of more precise estimates. Legislation and regulation of the insurance marketplace and products could also affect the profitability of our business, which in turn could adversely affect our financial condition.

2

Changes in reserve estimates may adversely affect our operating results.

We establish and hold reserves to pay future policy benefits and claims. The reserve for policy benefits is computed on a prescribed basis. Our reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability, but rather are actuarial or statistical estimates based on data and models that include many assumptions and projections, which are inherently uncertain and involve the exercise of significant judgment. We periodically review the adequacy of these reserves and the underlying assumptions. We cannot, however, determine with precision the amounts that we will pay for, or the timing of payment of, actual benefits, claims and expenses or whether the assets supporting our policy liabilities, together with future premiums, will grow to the level assumed prior to the payment of benefits or claims. If actual experience differs significantly from assumptions or estimates, reserves may not be adequate. If we conclude that our reserves, together with future premiums, are insufficient to cover future policy benefits and claims, we would be required to increase our reserves and incur income statement charges for the period in which we make the determination, which could materially and adversely affect our cash flow, results of operations and financial condition.

Changes in market interest rates and/or credit spreads may lead to a significant decrease in the profitability of our spread-based products and may adversely impact investment income.

We are subject to the risk that we will incur losses due to adverse changes in interest rates or credit spreads. Adverse changes to these rates and spreads may occur due to changes in fiscal policy and the economic climate, the liquidity of a market or market segment, insolvency or financial distress of key market makers or participants, or changes in market perceptions of creditworthiness and/or risk tolerance. We are subject to risks associated with potential declines in credit quality related to specific issuers or specific industries and a general weakening in the economy, which are typically reflected through credit spreads. Credit spread is the additional yield on fixed income securities above the risk-free rate (typically referenced as the yield on U.S. Treasury securities) that market participants require to compensate them for assuming credit, liquidity and/or prepayment risks. Credit spreads vary (i.e., increase or decrease) in response to the market’s perception of risk and liquidity in a specific issuer or specific sector and are influenced by the credit ratings, and the reliability of those ratings, published by external rating agencies. A decline in the quality of our investment portfolio as a result of changes in market interest rates, adverse economic conditions or otherwise could cause additional realized and unrealized losses on securities in our investment portfolio. Similarly, a ratings downgrade affecting a security we hold could indicate the credit quality of that security has deteriorated and could increase the capital we must hold to support that security to maintain our risk-based capital levels. Levels of writedowns and impairments are impacted by intent to sell, or our assessment of the likelihood that we will be required to sell, fixed maturity securities. Realized losses or impairments on these securities may have a material adverse effect on our net income in a particular period, which in turn could materially and adversely affect our cash flow, results of operations and financial condition.

Our ability to manage our fixed annuities and interest-sensitive life products is dependent upon maintaining profitable spreads between investment yields and interest crediting rates. When market interest rates decrease or remain at relatively low levels, cash flows from renewal premium or investments that have matured or have been prepaid or sold may be reinvested at lower yields, reducing investment spread. Lowering interest crediting rates on some products in such an environment can partially offset decreases in investment yield. However, these changes could be limited by market conditions, regulatory minimum rates or contractual minimum rate guarantees on many contracts and may not match the timing or magnitude of changes in investment yields. Decreases in the interest crediting rates offered on products could make those products less attractive, leading to changes in the level of policy loans, surrenders and withdrawals. This process may lead to a flow of cash out of our business. These outflows may require investment assets to be sold at a time when the prices of those assets are lower because of the increase in market interest rates, which may result in realized investment losses. For certain products, principally fixed annuity and interest-sensitive life products, the earned rate on assets could lag behind rising market yields. We may react to market conditions by increasing crediting rates, which could narrow spreads and reduce profitability on our business. Additionally, an increase in market interest rates or credit

3

spreads could have an adverse effect on the value of our investment portfolio by decreasing the fair values of the fixed income securities that comprise a substantial majority of our investment portfolio.

Guarantees within certain of our products may decrease our earnings, increase the volatility of our results, result in higher risk management costs and expose us to increased counterparty risk.

Certain of our products include guaranteed benefits. These guarantees are designed to protect contractholders against significant downturns in equity markets and interest rates. Any such periods of significant and sustained downturns in equity markets, increased equity volatility or reduced interest rates could result in an increase in the valuation of our liabilities associated with those products. An increase in these liabilities would result in a decrease in our net income. We use hedging and risk management strategies to mitigate the liability exposure and the volatility of net income associated with these liabilities. These strategies involve the use of reinsurance and derivatives, which may not be completely effective. In addition, hedging instruments may not effectively offset the costs of guarantees or may otherwise be insufficient in relation to our obligations. Furthermore, we are subject to the risk that changes in contractholder behavior or mortality, combined with adverse market events, produce economic losses not addressed by the risk management techniques employed. These, individually or collectively, may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, including net income, cash flow, financial condition or liquidity.

We may not be able to mitigate the capital impact associated with statutory reinsurance reserving requirements, potentially adversely impacting the profitability of our business.

To support statutory reserves for certain term and universal life insurance products with secondary guarantees, we currently utilize reinsurance and capital markets solutions for financing a portion of our statutory reserve requirements deemed to be non-economic. If we are not able to maintain sufficient financing as a result of market conditions or otherwise, this could potentially adversely impact the profitability of our business, which could materially and adversely effect our financial condition, cash flow and results of operations.

Changes in tax laws and the interpretations thereof may decrease the profitability of our products and could adversely affect the Company.

The U.S. Congress has, from time to time, considered legislation that could increase or adversely impact the manner of taxing the products the Company sells and of calculating the amount of taxes paid by life insurance companies or other corporations, including the Company.

The attractiveness to the Company’s customers of many of the Company’s products may be due, in part, to favorable tax treatment. Current U.S. federal income tax laws generally permit the tax-deferred accumulation of earnings on the premiums paid by the holders of life insurance and annuity products. Taxes, if any, are payable generally on income attributable to a distribution under the contract for the year in which the distribution is made. Congress has, from time to time, considered legislation that could have the effect of reducing or eliminating the benefit of such income tax deferral of taxation or otherwise affect the taxation of life insurance or annuity products. As a result, demand for certain of the Company’s life insurance and annuity products that offer income tax deferral could be negatively impacted. To the extent that legislation is enacted in the future to reduce the tax deferred status of life insurance or annuity products, limit the exclusion of death benefits from income, or reduce the taxation of competing products, all life insurance companies, including ours, could be adversely affected. Likewise, reductions in individual tax rates could reduce the attractiveness of tax deferral to the Company’s potential customers.

The Company’s taxes could increase as a result of changes in laws or regulations or in the interpretation of applicable tax laws and regulations. Furthermore, the value of deferred tax assets could be affected by the Company’s future earnings levels. There is a risk that the current administration could change rates or laws and negatively impact the Company’s earnings.

4

Regulations defining fiduciary could cause some changes to the manner in which we deliver products and services, as well as changes in the nature and amount of compensation and fees.

The Department of Labor, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) have announced proposals to develop fiduciary standards that would apply to recommendations made by certain financial advisors. Furthermore, several states have either issued their own fiduciary rules or are considering doing so and those rules may extend to certain types of products (e.g. insurance and annuities, financial planning, etc.) or may broadly cover all recommendations made by financial advisors.

Additionally, self-regulatory bodies such as the Certified Financial Planner Board are developing a fiduciary standard that would apply to their members, such as financial advisors who hold a Certified Financial Planner designation.

Depending on the span and substance of any fiduciary rules and regulations and timing of their applicability, the scope of any implementation should not materially impact the way we compensate our advisors, particularly with respect to our closed block annuity business. However, compliance with prohibited transactions exemptions, when fully phased in, would likely require additional supervision with the possibility of overlapping or competing requirements from other regulators and increase litigation risk, all of which could adversely impact our business, results of operations and/or financial condition.

The Company is dependent on the performance of others.

The Company relies on third parties to provide various services that are important to our business operations. Certain of these third parties may act on behalf of the Company or represent the Company in various capacities, including but not limited to the administration of our contractholders’ activities or the management of our invested assets on a day-to-day basis. If a third party fails to perform its obligations or acts inappropriately with respect to the Company or its products, it could materially adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, the Company’s operations are dependent on various technologies, some of which are provided and/or maintained by third parties. Any of the third parties that the Company depends upon may default on their services or obligations to the Company, including due to bankruptcy, insolvency, lack of liquidity, adverse economic conditions, operational failure, fraud or other reasons. Further, the Company may be held responsible for obligations that arise from the acts or omissions of these third parties. Such defaults could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

If our internal controls are ineffective, our operating results could be adversely affected.

Our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls or fraud. Even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or if we experience difficulties in their implementation, our business and operating results could be harmed and we could fail to meet our financial reporting obligations.

If our estimates or judgments relating to our critical accounting policies prove to be incorrect, our operating results could be adversely affected.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with statutory accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, as provided in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The results of these estimates form the basis for making

5

judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities and equity, and the amount of revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our operating results may be adversely affected if our assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our operating results to fall below our expectations.

We may be unable to retain our highly qualified employees.

Our business depends on our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly skilled and often highly specialized technical, actuarial, managerial and executive personnel, and there is no assurance that we will be able to do so. We compete with other financial services companies for employees primarily on the basis of compensation and financial position. Our reputation, operations and internal controls could be materially adversely affected if we are unsuccessful in recruiting and retaining highly qualified employees.

Risks Relating to Investments

The determination of the fair value of our fixed income securities is subjective and could materially impact our operating results and financial condition.

In determining fair values, we principally use the market approach which utilizes market transaction data for the same or similar instruments. The degree of management judgment involved in determining fair values is inversely related to the availability of market observable information. The fair value of assets may differ from the actual amount received upon sale of an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Moreover, the use of different valuation assumptions may have a material effect on the assets’ fair values. Changing market conditions could materially affect the determination of the fair value of securities and unrealized net capital gains and losses could vary significantly, which could materially and adversely affect our cash flows.

Concentration of our investment portfolio in any particular segment of the economy may have adverse effects on our operating results and financial condition.

Our investment portfolio is and may in the future be concentrated in a certain industry, collateral type, group of related industries, geographic sector or risk type. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations — Debt securities by Industry” and “— Commercial Mortgage Loans.” Any such current or future concentrations could have an adverse effect on our investment portfolio and consequently on our results of operations and financial condition. Events or developments that have a negative impact on any particular industry, group of related industries or geographic region may have a greater adverse effect on the investment portfolio to the extent that the portfolio is concentrated, rather than diversified.

The determination of the amount of other-than-temporary-impairments of our investments is subjective and could materially impact our operating results and financial condition.

The determination of the amount of realized capital losses recorded for impairments varies by investment type and is based on our ongoing evaluation and assessment of known and inherent risks associated with the respective asset class. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available. We update our evaluations regularly and reflect changes in other-than-temporary impairments in our results of operations. The assessment of whether other-than-temporary impairments have occurred is based on our case-by-case evaluation of the underlying reasons for the decline in fair value. We define fair value generally as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability. Our conclusions on such assessments are judgmental and include assumptions and projections of future cash flows which may ultimately prove to be incorrect as assumptions, facts and circumstances change. Furthermore, historical trends may not be indicative of future impairments and additional impairments may need to be recorded in the future.

6

Defaults or deteriorating credit of securities collateralized by residential and commercial mortgage loans, and collateralized corporate loans may lead to write-downs and impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Changes in residential or commercial mortgage delinquencies, loss severities or recovery rates, declining residential or commercial real estate prices, corporate loan delinquencies or recovery rates, changes in credit or bond insurer strength ratings and the quality of service provided by service providers on securities in our portfolio could lead us to determine that write-downs are necessary in the future, and could materially adversely affect our cash flow, results of operations and financial condition. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations — Commercial Mortgage Loans.”

Our investment strategies may not adequately protect against adverse developments in the financial markets.

While our investment management strategies are designed to protect asset value even in challenging market conditions, the Company cannot guarantee that such strategies would be successful, especially if there are unexpected developments in the financial markets. Slowing of global growth, tightening monetary policy in the U.S. and increasing political uncertainty remain key challenges for markets. There may be a limited market for certain investments we hold in our investment portfolio, making them relatively illiquid. These include corporate bonds, privately-placed fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans and policy loans. If we were forced to sell certain of our investments during periods of market volatility or disruption, market prices may be lower than our carrying value in such investments. Even in the absence of a market downturn, we are exposed to substantial risk of loss due to market volatility.

Uncertainty relating to the potential phasing out of LIBOR after 2021 may adversely affect the value of the Company’s investment portfolio, the value of embedded derivatives and the Company’s ability to issue funding agreements.

Regulators and law enforcement agencies in the UK and elsewhere are conducting civil and criminal investigations into whether the banks that contribute to the British Bankers’ Association (“BBA”) in connection with the calculation of the daily London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) may have been under-reporting or otherwise manipulating or attempting to manipulate LIBOR. A number of BBA member banks have entered into settlements with their regulators and law enforcement agencies with respect to this alleged manipulation of LIBOR.

Actions by the BBA, regulators or law enforcement agencies may result in changes to the manner in which LIBOR is determined or the establishment of alternative reference rates. For example, on July 27, 2017, the UK Financial Conduct Authority announced that it intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit LIBOR quotes after 2021. Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential changes, alternative reference rates or other reforms may adversely affect the trading market for LIBOR-based securities, including those held in the Company’s investment portfolio or used in the valuation of certain embedded derivatives. However, for U.S. dollar LIBOR, it now appears that the relevant date may be deferred to June 30, 2023 for the most common tenors (overnight and one, three, six and 12 months). An extension to 2023 would mean that many legacy U.S. dollar LIBOR contracts would terminate before related LIBOR rates cease to be published. However, regulators have emphasized that despite any continued publication of U.S. dollar LIBOR through June 30, 2023, no new contracts using U.S. dollar LIBOR should be entered into after December 31, 2021. Although the foregoing may provide some sense of timing, there is no assurance that LIBOR, of any particular currency and tenor, will continue to be published until any particular date.

Following the discontinuation of LIBOR, many of the Company’s investments may reset to an alternative rate. Such reset could adversely affect the Company’s current asset liability strategies. The establishment of alternative reference rates or implementation of any other potential changes relating to LIBOR phase-out may

7

adversely affect the Company’s reserves, net investment income and cost of capital. The Company is continuing to evaluate the potential impact of the potential LIBOR transition and the establishment of an alternative rate, and the Company cannot predict what impact any such changes may have on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Relating to the Insurance Industry

Difficult conditions in the global economy and capital markets generally could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Our business and results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the global capital markets and the economy generally. Stressed conditions, volatility and disruptions in global capital markets, particular markets, or financial asset classes can have an adverse effect on us, in part because we have a large investment portfolio and certain of our insurance liabilities are sensitive to changing market factors. Market factors, including interest rates, credit spreads, equity prices, real estate markets, consumer spending, business investment, government spending, the volatility and strength of the capital markets, deflation and inflation, all affect the business and economic environment and, ultimately, the amount and profitability of our business. Disruptions in one market or asset class can also spread to other markets or asset classes. Upheavals in the financial markets can also affect our business through their effects on general levels of economic activity, employment and customer behavior. Financial markets have also been affected periodically by concerns over U.S. fiscal policy. These issues could, on their own, or combined with the possible slowing of the global economy generally, have severe repercussions to the U.S. and global credit and financial markets, further exacerbate concerns over sovereign debt of other countries and disrupt economic activity in the U.S. and elsewhere.

General economic conditions could also adversely affect us in the form of consumer behavior and pressure investment results. Holders of some of our interest-sensitive life insurance and annuity products may engage in an elevated level of discretionary withdrawals of contractholder funds. Our contractholders may choose to defer paying insurance premium or stop paying insurance premiums altogether. Our investment results could be adversely affected as deteriorating financial and business conditions affect the issuers of the securities in our investment portfolio.

Losses from legal and regulatory actions may be material to our operating results or cash flows and may result in harm to our reputation.

We are involved in various legal actions in the ordinary course of business, the results of which we cannot predict with certainty. We are also subject to various regulatory actions and inquiries, such as information requests, market conduct examinations and books and record examinations from state and federal regulators and other authorities. A substantial legal liability or significant regulatory action against us, as well as regulatory inquiries or investigations, could harm our reputation, result in material fines or penalties, result in significant legal costs and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Even if we ultimately prevail in the litigation, regulatory actions or investigation, our ability to retain our current contractholders and recruit and retain employees could be materially and adversely impacted. In addition, in some class action and other lawsuits, financial services companies have made material settlement payments. The Company may incur substantial defense costs, settlements or judgments in any such future claims or actions, which could adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations.

We are subject to extensive regulation and potential further restrictive regulation may increase our operating costs.

As an insurance company, we are subject to extensive laws and regulations.

The extent of regulation varies, but generally the Company is governed by state statutes. These statutes delegate regulatory, supervisory and administrative authority to state insurance departments. This system of

8

supervision and regulation covers, among other things, standards of minimum capital requirements and solvency, including risk-based capital measurements, restrictions on certain transactions, licensing status, reserving, payment of policy benefits, etc. State insurance regulators and the NAIC regularly re-examine existing laws and regulations applicable to insurance companies and their products. Changes in these laws and regulations, or in interpretations thereof, sometimes lead to additional expense for the insurer and, thus, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Regulatory authorities have relatively broad discretion to grant, renew or revoke licenses and approvals. If we do not have the requisite licenses and approvals or do not comply with applicable regulatory requirements, the insurance regulatory authorities could preclude or temporarily suspend us from carrying on some or all of our activities or impose substantial fines. Further, insurance regulatory authorities have relatively broad discretion to issue orders of supervision, which permit such authorities to supervise the business and operations of an insurance company.

Failure of the Company to maintain its licenses in each jurisdiction could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

As an insurance company with separate accounts that are regulated as investment companies, we are also subject to laws and regulations administered and enforced by a number of different governmental authorities, each of which exercises a degree of interpretive latitude, including state insurance regulators, state securities administrators, state attorneys general, and federal agencies including the SEC, the FINRA and the U.S. Department of Justice. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in material fines or other penalties, as well as unexpected costs in remedying any such failure. In addition, we are subject to the risk that compliance with any particular regulator’s or enforcement authority’s interpretation of a legal issue may not result in compliance with another’s interpretation of the same issue. Further, there is risk that any particular regulator’s or enforcement authority’s interpretation of a legal issue may change over time to our detriment, or that changes in the overall legal environment may, even absent any particular regulator’s or enforcement authority’s interpretation of a legal issue, result in material fines or penalties or increased costs, which could in turn negatively impact our financial condition, cash flow and results of operations.

Regulatory reforms, and the more stringent application of existing regulations, may make it more expensive for us to conduct our business and increase our capital requirements.

Over the last decade, the federal government enacted comprehensive regulatory reforms for financial services entities. As part of a larger effort to strengthen the regulation of the financial services market, certain reforms are applicable to the insurance industry, including the Federal Insurance Office (“FIO”) established within the Treasury Department.

As the state insurance regulatory framework has come under public scrutiny, members of Congress have discussed proposals to provide for federal chartering of insurance companies, and the FIO and Financial Stability Oversight Council were established. We can make no assurances regarding the potential impact of state or federal measures that may change the nature or scope of insurance and financial regulation. Regulatory reforms and legislative change or regulatory requirements imposed upon us in connection with the federal government’s regulatory reform of the financial services industry, and any more stringent enforcement of existing regulations by federal authorities, may make it more expensive for us to conduct our business.

The Company is subject to insurance guaranty fund laws, rules and regulations that could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Under insurance guaranty fund laws in most states, insurance companies doing business therein can be assessed up to prescribed limits for contractholder or policyholder losses incurred by insolvent companies. From time to time, companies may be asked to contribute amounts beyond prescribed limits. It is possible that the

9

Company could be assessed with respect to product lines not offered by the Company. In addition, legislation may be introduced in various states with respect to guaranty fund assessment laws related to insurance products, including long term care insurance and other specialty products, that alters future premium tax offsets received in connection with guaranty fund assessments. The Company cannot predict the amount, nature or timing of any future assessments or legislation, any of which could have a material and adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Reinsurance may be unavailable at current levels and prices.

Market conditions beyond our control impact the availability and cost of the reinsurance we secure to lessen our risk with respect to the contracts and policies we have issued. No assurances can be made that reinsurance will remain continuously available to us to the same extent and on the same terms and rates as is currently available. We review retention limits for continued appropriateness and they may be changed in the future. Prolonged or severe adverse mortality or morbidity experience could result in increased reinsurance costs or, ultimately, reinsurers unwilling to offer coverage. If we were unable to renew or purchase reinsurance protection in amounts that we consider sufficient and at prices that we consider acceptable, we may have to accept an increase in risk exposure, seek other alternatives, or accept reduced profitability.

Reinsurance subjects us to the credit risk of our reinsurers and may not be adequate to protect us against losses arising from ceded insurance, which could have a material effect on our operating results.

The collectability of reinsurance recoverables is subject to uncertainty arising from a number of factors, including changes in market conditions, whether insured losses meet the qualifying conditions of the reinsurance contract and whether reinsurers, or their affiliates, have the financial capacity and willingness to make payments under the terms of a reinsurance treaty or contract. While we aim to avoid overexposure by entering into reinsurance agreements with varied counterparties, the liabilities for certain products, including the Contracts, are reinsured exclusively to one or a small group of reinsurers. Our inability to collect a material recovery from one or more reinsurers could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and cash flows.

Adverse capital and credit market conditions may significantly affect our ability to meet liquidity needs or our ability to obtain credit on acceptable terms.

In periods of extreme volatility and disruption in the capital and credit markets, liquidity and credit capacity may be severely restricted. In such circumstances, our ability to obtain capital to fund operating expenses, financing costs, satisfy statutory capital requirements and meet liquidity needs may be limited. Our access to additional financing will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit, the overall availability of credit to our industry, our credit ratings and credit capacity, as well as lenders’ perception of our long- or short-term financial prospects. Similarly, our access to funds may be impaired if regulatory authorities or rating agencies take negative actions against us. If a combination of these factors were to occur, our internal sources of liquidity may prove to be insufficient, and in such case, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms. Our results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and statutory capital position could be materially adversely affected by disruptions in the capital markets.

A downgrade or a potential downgrade in our financial strength or credit rating could result in a loss of business and materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Financial strength ratings are published by various Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (“NRSRO”) and similar entities not formally recognized as NRSROs. They indicate the NRSROs’ opinion regarding an insurance company’s ability to meet contractholder obligations and can be important to maintaining public confidence in our products and our competitive position.

10

In view of the difficulties experienced by many financial institutions as a result of the financial crisis and ensuing global recession, including certain members in the insurance industry, NRSROs continue to implement changes to their internal models that have the effect of increasing or decreasing the amount of statutory capital we must hold in order to maintain our current ratings. Our ratings could be downgraded at any time and without notice by any NRSRO. In addition, these reforms may also increase our minimum capital requirements.

Downgrades in our financial strength ratings could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations in many ways, including materially increasing the number or amount of policy surrenders and withdrawals by contractholders and adversely affecting our ability to obtain reinsurance at reasonable prices or at all.

The occurrence of a catastrophe, including the continued threat of terrorism or military actions may have an adverse effect on the level of claim losses we incur, the value of our investment portfolio, our competitive position, liquidity, operating results and attractiveness of product offering.

Any catastrophic event, such as the continued threat of terrorism within the United States and abroad, or military and other actions, and heightened security measures in response to these types of threats, may cause significant volatility and losses in our investment portfolio from changes, and result in loss of life, disruptions to commerce and reduced economic activity. Some of the assets in our investment portfolio may be adversely affected by reduced economic activity caused by the continued threat of terrorism. Additionally, a terrorist act could have a material effect on renewal premium, profitability, competitiveness, liquidity, operating results and attractiveness of product offering.

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic could adversely affect the Company’s business, including revenues, profitability, results of operations and/or cash flows, in a manner and to a degree that cannot be predicted but could be material.

The global COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in and is expected to continue to result in significant disruptions in economic activity and financial markets. COVID-19 has directly and indirectly adversely affected the Company and may continue to do so for an uncertain period of time. The cumulative effects of COVID-19 on the Company cannot be predicted at this time, but could include, without limitation:

11

Climate change may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Global climate change could have an impact on our investment portfolio resulting in realized or unrealized losses which could have a material financial impact on the Company. Additionally, there could be social and/or regulatory impacts in response to climate change which could have a material financial impact on the Company.

Changes in accounting standards issued by standard-setting bodies may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our financial statements are subject to the application of statutory accounting principles, which are periodically revised, interpreted and/or expanded. Accordingly, we may be required to adopt new guidance or interpretations, or could be subject to existing guidance as we enter into new transactions, which may have a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition that is either unexpected or has a greater impact than expected.

Any changes in the method of calculating reserves for our life insurance and annuity products under statutory accounting principles may result in increased or decreased reserve requirements. The NAIC has announced focused industry inquiries on certain matters that could have an impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Such inquiries concern, for example, insurer use of captive reinsurance companies, variable annuity reserves and capital treatment, reinsurance, cybersecurity practices and risk-based capital calculations. In addition, the NAIC continues to consider various initiatives to change and modernize its financial and solvency requirements and regulations. It has adopted principles-based reserving methodologies for life insurance and annuity reserves, but additional formulas and/or guidance relevant to the new standard are being developed. The NAIC is also considering changes to accounting regulations, governance practices of insurers and other items. The Company cannot currently estimate what impact these more focused inquiries or proposed changes, if they occur, will have on reserve and capital requirements, financial condition or results of operations.

For a description of changes in accounting standards that are currently pending and, if known, our estimates of their expected impact, see Note 2 to the financial statements.

The Company depends on the performance of its third-party service providers, and their failure to perform in a satisfactory manner could adversely affect the Company’s business.

A number of elements of the Company’s operations are managed on an outsourced basis, in particular with two counterparties. These arrangements create performance risks for the Company’s business and, to a lesser

12

extent, create the risk that the Company’s operating expenses will increase. Failure in or poor performance by any of the aforementioned third-party service providers, including, for example, if the third party fails to meet contractual requirements, fails to comply with applicable laws and regulations, suffers a cyber-attack or other security breach, fails to provide the Company or its policyholders with timely and accurate information or fails to maintain adequate internal controls, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. If the Company elects to replace any of these third-party service providers due to such failures or poor performance, the Company may incur costs in connection with finding, retaining and operationalizing suitable replacement providers.

With respect to third-party service providers who perform policy administration services, failures in, or poor performance by, these third-party administrators could result in an increase in customer complaints and regulatory intervention. Poor performance by third-party administrators may also have a negative impact on the Company’s wholesaler, agent and distribution partner relationships. If any of these third-party administrators or their employees are found to have made material misrepresentations to the Insurance Subsidiaries’ policyholders and customers, violated applicable insurance, privacy or other laws and regulations or otherwise engaged in misconduct, the Insurance Subsidiaries could be held liable for their actions, which could adversely affect the Company’s reputation and business prospects, may lead to regulatory sanctions or litigation and could result in financial harm. The precautions taken to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. Although the Insurance Subsidiaries employ controls and procedures designed to monitor vendors and to prevent the Company’s or them from taking excessive or inappropriate risks, employees of the Company’s vendors may take such risks regardless of such controls and procedures. Any such failures or poor performance by the Company’s third-party service providers could adversely affect the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

Controls and disaster recovery plans surrounding the Company’s information technology (“IT”) could fail or security could be compromised, which could damage the Company’s business and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company’s business is highly dependent upon the effective operation of the Company’s IT and that of third-party providers. The Company relies on IT throughout its business for a variety of functions, including processing claims, transactions and applications, providing information to policyholders and distributors, performing actuarial analyses and maintaining financial records. Despite the implementation of security policies, procedures, automation and backup plans designed to prevent or limit the effect of any infiltration, failure or disruption, the Company’s IT may be vulnerable to physical or electronic intrusions, computer viruses or other attacks, programming errors, disruptions or breaches as a result of natural disasters, man-made disasters, human error, criminal activity, or other events beyond the Company’s control. The failure of controls and/or disaster recovery plans surrounding the Company’s IT for any reason could cause significant interruptions to the Company’s operations, which could result in an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. The Company plans to continue to make significant investments in IT to support the growth of its business.

The Company also retains confidential and proprietary information on its computer systems and those of its third-party providers. The Company and its third-party providers rely on sophisticated technologies to maintain the security of such information. Such computer systems may be subject to computer viruses or other malicious codes, unauthorized access, cyber-attacks or other computer-related penetrations. While, to date, the Company is not aware of having experienced a material data breach, administrative, physical and technical controls and other preventive actions taken to reduce the risk of cyber-incidents and protect the Company’s data and technology may be insufficient to prevent physical and electronic break-ins, cyber-attacks or other security breaches. In some cases, such physical and electronic break-ins, cyber-attacks or other security breaches may not be immediately detected. This may impede or interrupt the Company’s business operations, could result in regulatory fines and enforcement, class action lawsuits or reputational harm, and could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the availability and cost of

13

insurance for operational and other risks relating to the Company’s business and systems may change and any such change may affect the Company’s results of operations.

In the event of a disaster such as a natural catastrophe, epidemic, industrial accident, blackout, computer virus, terrorist attack, cyberattack or war, unanticipated problems with the Company’s disaster recovery systems could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s ability to conduct business and on the Company’s results of operations and financial position, particularly if those problems affect the Company’s computer-based data processing, transmission, storage and retrieval systems and destroy valuable data. In addition, in the event that a significant number of the Company’s managers, or employees were unavailable following a disaster, the Company’s ability to effectively conduct business could be severely compromised. These interruptions also may interfere with the Company’s suppliers’ ability to provide goods and services and the Company’s employees’ ability to perform their job responsibilities.

Any failure to protect the confidentiality of client information could adversely affect the Company’s reputation and have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Pursuant to U.S. federal and state laws, and laws of other jurisdictions in which the Company operates, various government agencies have established rules protecting the privacy and security of personal information, including personally identifiable policyholder information. In addition, most U.S. states and a number of jurisdictions outside the United States, have enacted laws, which vary significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, to safeguard the privacy and security of personal information, including personally identifiable policyholder information. Further, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, or the (“GLB Act”), imposes privacy requirements on financial institutions, including obligations to protect and safeguard consumers’ nonpublic personal information and records, and limits the ability to share and reuse such information. Additionally, The NAIC has adopted the Insurance Data Security Model Law which established the standards for data security and investigation and notification of a breach of data security for insurance companies, and an increasing number of states require that affected persons be notified if a security breach results in the disclosure of their personally identifiable information. Any compromise of the security of our computer systems that results in the inappropriate disclosure of personally identifiable customer information could damage our reputation in the marketplace, subject us to significant civil and criminal liability and require us to incur significant technical, legal and other expenses. Many regulators have indicated an intention to take more aggressive enforcement actions regarding cybersecurity and data privacy matters, and private litigation resulting from such matters is increasing and resulting in progressively larger judgments and settlements.

Many of the Company’s employees have access to, and routinely process, personal information of clients through a variety of media, including IT systems. The Company relies on various internal processes and controls to protect the confidentiality of client information that is accessible to, or in the possession of, the Company and its employees. It is possible that an employee could, intentionally or unintentionally, disclose or misappropriate confidential client information, including personally identifiable policyholder information, or the Company’s data could be the subject of a cybersecurity attack. If the Company fails to maintain adequate internal controls or if the Company’s employees fail to comply with the Company’s policies and procedures, misappropriation or intentional or unintentional inappropriate disclosure or misuse of client information, including personally identifiable policyholder information, could occur. Such internal control inadequacies or non-compliance could materially damage the Company’s reputation or lead to civil or criminal penalties, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, the Company’s third-party service providers, including third parties to whom the Company outsources certain of its functions, are also subject to the risks outlined above, any one of which could result in damage to the company’s reputation, or the Company incurring substantial costs or other negative consequences to the Company. If the Company or any of the Company’s third-party service providers fail to protect the confidentiality of client information, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

14

The technology the Company licenses may subject it to claims of infringement or invalidity from third parties.

The Company’s reliance on technology subjects it to the risk that other parties may assert, rightly or wrongly, that its intellectual property rights are invalid or violate the rights of those parties, as well as the risk that the Company’s intellectual property rights will be infringed upon by third parties. In general, defending intellectual property rights in litigation is expensive. The Company’s involvement in litigation of this type would likely have a material and adverse effect on its business and results of operation. In addition, any outcome that invalidates its intellectual property rights or otherwise diminishes the competitive advantages obtained, at least in part, through the use of those rights could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s overall success. The magnitude of this risk to the Company’s business generally rises if and as it become more successful in employing and relying on the technology. Any such claims would be complex and costly, and adverse outcomes could undermine the competitive advantages that the Company seeks to gain.

Our risk management policies and procedures may leave us exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risk, which could negatively affect our business.

We have devoted significant resources to develop and periodically update our risk management policies and procedures to reflect ongoing review of our risks and expect to continue to do so in the future. Nonetheless, our policies and procedures may not be comprehensive and may not identify every risk to which we are exposed. Many of our methods for managing risk and exposures are based upon the use of observed historical market behavior or statistics based on historical models. As a result, these methods may not fully predict future exposures, which can be significantly greater than our historical measures indicate. Other risk management methods depend upon the evaluation of information regarding markets, clients, catastrophe occurrence or other matters that is publicly available or otherwise accessible to us. This information may not always be accurate, complete, up-to-date or properly evaluated. In addition, more extensive and perhaps different risk management policies and procedures might have to be implemented under pending regulations. Any such unforeseen risk, as well as the implementation of any additional risk management policies and procedures may result in material costs to the Company, which could materially adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, cash flow and results of operations.

The effectiveness of our actuarial and other financial models may adversely affect our financial results, capitalization and financial condition.

Actuarial and other financial models are used primarily to determine reserve levels for our in-force block and to provide information to key internal stakeholders for planning, asset / liability management, and risk / stress testing analysis purposes. The models are subject to extensive internal controls which promote repeatability and sustainability, and are also subject to continual review regarding effectiveness, logic, assumptions and underlying product mechanics and refinements may be implemented based on these reviews. Refinements are subject to a rigorous change management process and are agreed upon with key internal stakeholders prior to implementation. While models are continually improving as a result of these refinements, there are still inherent limitations. First, no assurances can be given that all necessary refinements will be identified and/or implemented in our actuarial models. Also, due to the nature of the underlying risks and the uncertainty associated with prospective modeling techniques and the application of such techniques, these models may not accurately capture the evolution of the in-force block, as we cannot determine precisely the actual experience, policyholder behavior and investment income. Variations in any of the foregoing from estimates in our models may result in the need to post additional reserves, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition including by adversely affecting the Company’s capital adequacy ratios utilized by NRSROs to assign credit ratings.

15

Lincoln Benefit Life Company (referred to in this document as “we,” “Lincoln Benefit,” “our,” “us” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nebraska in 1938. Lincoln Benefit is a wholly- owned subsidiary of LBL HoldCo II, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of LBL HoldCo, Inc. (“HoldCo Parent”). HoldCo Parent is a wholly-owned subsidiary of GILICO. Prior to December 31, 2019, HoldCo Parent was a wholly-owned subsidiary of RL LP and RL (Parallel) Partnership.

Prior to July 18, 2013, we sold interest-sensitive, traditional and variable life insurance, and fixed annuities including deferred and immediate, through independent master brokerage agencies and the Allstate exclusive agency channel. In July 2013, we ceased soliciting and selling new policies through our independent agent channel. In 2017, we ceased soliciting and selling new policies through the Allstate exclusive agency channel.

In 2015, the administration of our retained deferred annuity and life business was outsourced to unaffiliated third-party service providers, SE2, LLC and Alliance–One Services, Inc. Allstate Life Insurance Company (“ALIC”) continues to reinsure and administer business sold through the Allstate exclusive agency channel and certain life, immediate and payout annuity contracts. LifeCare Assurance Company administers the Company’s long-term care business.

Lincoln Benefit’s variable annuity business is reinsured by ALIC under an existing reinsurance agreement between Lincoln Benefit and ALIC. In 2006, ALIC disposed of substantially all of its variable annuity business through reinsurance agreements with The Prudential Insurance Company of America, a subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc. The Company was not a direct party to this agreement and its reinsurance agreement with ALIC remains unchanged.

In our reports, we occasionally refer to statutory financial information. All domestic U.S. insurance companies are required to prepare statutory-basis financial statements. As a result, industry data is available that enables comparisons between insurance companies, including competitors that are not subject to the requirement to prepare financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We frequently use industry publications containing statutory financial information to assess our competitive position.

Lincoln Benefit is subject to extensive regulation, primarily at the state level. The method, extent and substance of such regulation varies by state but generally has its source in statutes that establish standards and requirements for conducting the business of insurance and that delegate regulatory authority to a state agency. These rules have a substantial effect on our business and relate to a wide variety of matters, including insurer solvency, reserve adequacy, insurance company licensing and examination, agent licensing, policy forms, rate setting, the nature and amount of investments, claims practices, participation in guaranty funds, transactions with affiliates, the payment of dividends, underwriting standards, statutory accounting methods, trade practices and corporate governance.

Lincoln Benefit occupies leased office space in Lincoln, Nebraska and Rosemont, Illinois.

Lincoln Benefit is engaged in routine lawsuits, which, in management’s judgment, are not of material importance to its total assets or business prospects.

16

Lincoln Benefit Life Company

(A Wholly-Owned subsidiary of LBL HoldCo II, Inc.)

Index

December 31, 2020

17

Report of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors

Lincoln Benefit Life Company

We have audited the accompanying statutory-basis financial statements of Lincoln Benefit Life Company (the Company), which comprise the statutory statements of admitted assets, liabilities, and capital stock and surplus as of December 31, 2020, and the related statutory statements of operations, statutory statements of changes in capital stock and surplus and statutory statements of cash flow for the year then ended, and the related notes to the financial statements.

Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in conformity with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Nebraska Department of Insurance. Management also is responsible for the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free of material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Basis for Adverse Opinion on U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

As described in Note 1 to the statutory-basis financial statements, the Company prepared these financial statements using accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Nebraska Department of Insurance, which is a basis of accounting other than U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The effects on the financial statements of the variances between these statutory accounting practices and U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, although not reasonably determinable, are presumed to be material.

Adverse Opinion on U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

In our opinion, because of the significance of the matter described in the Basis for Adverse Opinion on U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles paragraph, the statutory-basis financial statements referred to above do not present fairly, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2020, or the results of its operations or its cash flows for the year then ended.

18

Opinion on Statutory-Basis of Accounting

In our opinion, the statutory-basis financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, on the basis of accounting described in Note 1.

April 15, 2021

19

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of

Lincoln Benefit Life Company

Rosemont, Illinois

We have audited the accompanying statutory financial statements of Lincoln Benefit Life Company (the “Company”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of LBL HoldCo II, Inc., which comprise the statutory statement of admitted assets, liabilities and capital stock and surplus as of December 31, 2019, and the related statutory statements of operations, changes in capital stock and surplus, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related notes to the statutory financial statements (collectively referred to as the “statutory financial statements”).

Management’s Responsibility for the Statutory Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Insurance Department of the State of Nebraska. Management is also responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these statutory financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the statutory financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the statutory financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the statutory financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company’s preparation and fair presentation of the statutory financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the statutory financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.

Basis for Adverse Opinion on Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States of America

As described in Note 1 to the statutory financial statements, the statutory financial statements are prepared by Lincoln Benefit Life Company using the accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Insurance Department of the State of Nebraska, which is a basis of accounting other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, to meet the requirements of the Insurance Department of the State of Nebraska.

The effects on the statutory financial statements of the variances between the statutory basis of accounting described in Note 1 to the statutory financial statements and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, although not reasonably determinable, are presumed to be material.

20

Adverse Opinion on Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States of America

In our opinion, because of the significance of the matter described in the Basis for Adverse Opinion on Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States of America paragraph, the statutory financial statements referred to above do not present fairly, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the financial position of Lincoln Benefit Life Company as of December 31, 2019, or the results of its operations or its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Opinion on Statutory Basis of Accounting

In our opinion, the statutory financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the admitted assets, liabilities and capital and surplus of Lincoln Benefit Life Company as of December 31, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Insurance Department of the State of Nebraska as described in Note 1 to the statutory financial statements.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Chicago, Illinois

March 30, 2020

21

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

STATUTORY STATEMENTS OF ADMITTED ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL STOCK AND SURPLUS

DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND DECEMBER 31, 2019

($’S IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

See Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements

22

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

STATUTORY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020, 2019 AND 2018

($ IN THOUSANDS)

See Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements

23

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

STATUTORY STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL STOCK AND SURPLUS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020, 2019 AND 2018

($’S IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

See Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements

24

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

STATUTORY STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020, 2019 AND 2018

($’S IN THOUSANDS)

See Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements

25

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

GENERAL

Lincoln Benefit Life Company (the “Company” or “Lincoln Benefit”) is a stock insurance company domiciled in the State of Nebraska. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of LBL HoldCo II, Inc. (“HoldCo”), which in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of LBL HoldCo, Inc. (“Holdings”).

On December 31, 2019, Guaranty Income Life Insurance Company (“GILICO”), an Iowa-domiciled insurance company, completed the acquisition (the “Transaction”) of Holdings and its subsidiaries (including the Company). Prior to December 31, 2019, Holdings was a wholly-owned subsidiary of RL LP (formerly Resolution Life LP) and RL Parallel LP (formerly Resolution Life (Parallel) LP).

Lancaster Re Captive Insurance Company (“Lancaster Re”), a Nebraska domiciled captive insurance company, became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lincoln Benefit on April 1, 2014.

The Company is authorized to sell life insurance and retirement products in all states except New York, as well as, in the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam. Prior to July 18, 2013, the Company sold interest-sensitive, traditional and variable life insurance products through both exclusive agencies (“Allstate Sales channel”) and independent master brokerage agencies. Effective July 17, 2013, sales through the independent master brokerage agencies ceased. Sales through the Allstate Sales channel ceased in 2017.

Allstate Life Insurance Company (“ALIC”) continues to administer and reinsure all life insurance business written by Lincoln Benefit through the Allstate Sales channel, all immediate annuities written by Lincoln Benefit prior to April 1, 2014, certain term life policies written by Lincoln Benefit, and Lincoln Benefit’s variable annuity business.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying statutory financial statements of the Company are presented on the basis of accounting principles prescribed or permitted by the Nebraska Department of Insurance (“NE DOI” or the “Department”). The NE DOI requires insurance companies domiciled in the State of Nebraska to prepare their statutory financial statements in accordance with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual (“NAIC SAP”). Prescribed statutory accounting practices include a variety of publications of the NAIC, as well as state laws, regulations and general administrative rules. Permitted statutory accounting practices encompass all accounting practices not so prescribed. There are no deviations from NAIC SAP in the Company’s statutory financial statements as presented for December 31, 2020, 2019 or 2018.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NAIC SAP AND U.S. GAAP

Accounting principles and procedures of the NAIC as prescribed or permitted by the Department comprise a comprehensive basis of accounting other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). NAIC SAP differs from U.S. GAAP in several respects, which causes differences in reported assets, liabilities, stockholder’s equity (statutory capital and surplus), net income, and cash flows. The principal differences between NAIC SAP and U.S. GAAP include:

26

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

27

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

The effects on the Company’s financial statements attributable to the differences between NAIC SAP and U.S. GAAP are unknown and are presumed to be material.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with statutory accounting principles prescribed or permitted by the State of Nebraska requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. It also requires disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The most significant estimates are those used in determining the fair value of financial instruments, allowance for loan losses, aggregate reserves for life policies and

28

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

contracts, deferred income taxes, provision for income taxes and other-than-temporary impairments (“OTTI”) of investments.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into transactions involving various types of financial instruments, including cash equivalents, short-term investments, debt and equity securities and mortgage loans. These instruments involve credit risk and also may be subject to risk of loss due to interest rate fluctuation. The Company evaluates and monitors each financial instrument individually and, when appropriate, obtains collateral or other security to minimize losses.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Company in preparing the accompanying statutory-based financial statements:

INVESTMENTS

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are highly liquid securities. The Company’s cash equivalents primarily may include cash, commercial paper and certain money market investments which have an original term to maturity of less than three months. Short-term investments include debt instruments with a term to maturity exceeding three months, but less than one year on the date of acquisition. Cash equivalents and short-term investments are carried at estimated fair value or amortized cost, which approximates fair value.

Bonds

Investments in debt securities including bonds, mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and asset-backed securities (“ABS”) are stated at amortized cost using the interest method. Where the NAIC rating has fallen to 6 and the fair value has fallen below amortized cost, they are stated at fair value. The ratings for certain residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) were determined by comparing the insurer’s carrying value divided by remaining par value to price ranges modeled by a third-party vendor chosen by the NAIC that correspond to each NAIC designation. Comparisons were initially made to the model based on amortized cost. Where the resulting rating was a NAIC 6 per the model, further comparison based on fair value was required which, in some cases, resulted in a higher final NAIC rating.

Amortization of the premium or discount from the purchase of these securities considers the estimated timing and amount of prepayments of the underlying loans. Actual prepayment experience is periodically reviewed and effective yields are recalculated when differences arise between the prepayments originally anticipated and the actual prepayments received and currently anticipated. Prepayment assumptions for single-class and multi-class MBS and ABS are estimated by management using inputs obtained from third-party specialists and based on management’s knowledge of the current market. For prepayment-sensitive securities such as interest-only and principal-only strips, inverse floaters and credit-sensitive MBS and ABS securities, which represent beneficial interests in securitized financial assets that are not of high credit quality or that have been credit impaired, the effective yield is recalculated on a prospective basis. For all other MBS and ABS, the effective yield is recalculated on a retrospective basis. If the collection of all contractual cash flows is not probable, an OTTI may be indicated. The process of analyzing securities for an OTTI adjustment is further described in Note 3.

29

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

Common Stocks

The Company holds unaffiliated common stock. Common stock is held at fair value, while shares of Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago are reported at cost which approximates fair value.

Preferred Stocks

The Company holds a mix of unaffiliated redeemable and non-redeemable preferred stock. Preferred stocks are reported at amortized cost based on credit rating as prescribed in Statement of Statutory Accounting Principle (“SSAP”) No. 32, “Preferred Stock”.

Investments in Subsidiaries

Investments in insurance subsidiaries are carried based on the underlying statutory equity of the subsidiary. The Company’s investment in Lancaster Re is fully nonadmitted as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. The Company’s book/carrying values and nonadmitted value of its investment in Lancaster Re were $168.0 million and $156.8 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Mortgage Loans

Mortgage loans are stated at unpaid principal balances, net of provisions for estimated losses. Mortgage loans acquired at a premium or discount are stated at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method, net of provisions for estimated losses. Purchases and sales of mortgage loans are recognized or derecognized in the Company’s Statutory Statements of Admitted Assets, Liabilities and Capital Stock on the loan’s settlement date, which is the date that the Company cash settles the purchase or sale of the loan. Transaction costs on mortgage loans are capitalized on initial recognition and are recognized in the Company’s Statutory Statements of Operations using the effective interest rate method. Mortgage loans, which primarily include commercial first lien mortgages, are diversified by property type and geographic area throughout the United States. Mortgage loans are collateralized by the related properties and generally are no more than 75% of the property’s value at the time that the original loan is made. The Company regularly assesses the value of the collateral.

A mortgage loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the principal or interest is not collectible in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. When a mortgage loan is classified as impaired, allowances for credit losses are established to adjust the carrying value of the loan to its net recoverable amount.

The allowance for credit losses are estimated using the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. A specific allowance for loan loss is established for an impaired loan if the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or the fair value of the collateral less cost to sell, is less than the recorded amount of the loan. The full extent of impairment in the mortgage portfolio cannot be assessed solely by reviewing these loans individually. A general allowance for loan loss is established based on an assessment of past loss experience on groups of loans with similar characteristics and current economic conditions. While management believes that it uses the best information available to establish the loan loss allowances, future adjustments may become necessary if economic conditions differ from the assumptions used in calculating them.

It is the Company’s policy to cease to carry accrued interest on commercial mortgage loans in default if deemed uncollectible or over 180 days past due. The Company held no investments in non-accrual status as of December 31, 2020 or 2019. Interest income is recognized on impaired mortgage loans upon receipt.

30

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

Changes in allowances for losses are recorded as changes in unrealized gains and losses to surplus. Once the conditions causing impairment improve and future payments are reasonably assured, the mortgages are no longer classified as impaired and the Company resumes accrual of income. However, if the original terms of the contract have been changed resulting in the Company providing an economic concession to the borrower at below market rates, then the mortgage is reclassified as restructured.

If the conditions causing impairment do not improve and future payments remain unassured, the Company typically derecognizes the asset through disposition or foreclosure. Uncollectible collateral-dependent loans are written off through realized losses for any difference between the carrying value and amount received for the underlying property at the time of disposition or foreclosure.

Contract Loans

Contract loans are carried at the amount of outstanding principal balance. Contract loans are collateralized by the related insurance policy and do not exceed the net cash surrender value of such policy.

Other Investments

Other investments include investments in surplus notes, interests in limited partnerships derivatives (see below) and collateral loans. Investments in surplus notes that are rated NAIC 1 or NAIC 2 are carried at amortized cost. Investments in limited partnerships that lack a controlling ownership interest are reported under the equity method. Collateral loans are reported at outstanding balance with a corresponding non-admitted asset for any amounts which are in excess of the fair value of the pledged collateral.

Derivatives

Derivative instruments used in hedging transactions that meet the criteria of a highly effective hedge are valued and reported consistently with the hedged items. Derivative instruments used in hedging transactions that do not meet or no longer meet the criteria of an effective hedge are valued at fair value with the changes in fair value recorded as unrealized gains and losses in statutory surplus. Realized investment gains and losses from derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting are reduced by amounts transferred to IMR.

Derivative financial instruments acquired by the Company were used to economically hedge the risks with certain assets and liabilities arising from potential adverse impacts from changes in risk-free interest rates and equity markets related to the Company’s equity indexed annuity and life contracts. The Company does not use derivatives for speculative purposes. Derivatives may include index option contracts and futures and interest rate swaps and are included in Other Investments on the Statutory Statements of Admitted Assets, Liabilities and Capital and Surplus. The notional amounts specified in the contracts are used to calculate contractual payments under the agreements and are generally not representative of the potential for gain or loss on these contracts.

The Company did not report any derivatives as accounting hedges as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.

ASSET VALUATION RESERVE AND INTEREST MAINTENANCE RESERVE

The AVR is established as a liability based upon a formula prescribed by the NAIC to offset potential credit-related investment losses on all invested assets, with changes in the AVR charged or credited directly to surplus. The IMR is established as a liability to capture realized gains and losses, net of income tax, on the sale of fixed income investments, principally bonds and mortgage loans, resulting from changes in the

31

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

general level of interest rates, and is amortized into income over the remaining years to expected maturity of the assets sold. Should the deferral of realized losses, net of income tax, result in a debit balance IMR, that amount is presented as an asset and nonadmitted.

INVESTMENT INCOME DUE AND ACCRUED

Accrued investment income consists primarily of interest and dividends. Interest is recognized on an accrual basis and dividends are recorded as earned on the ex-dividend date. Due and accrued income is not recorded on: (a) bonds in default, (b) bonds delinquent more than 90 days or where collection of interest is improbable and (c) mortgage loans in default if deemed uncollectible or over 180 days past due. As of December 31, 2020, and 2019, the Company’s nonadmitted investment income due and accrued was zero.

POLICY AND CONTRACT RESERVES

Policy reserves on annuity and supplementary contracts are calculated using the Commissioners’ Annuity Reserve Valuation Method, except variable annuities which use the Commissioners’ Annuity Reserve Valuation Method for Variable Annuities. The valuation interest assumptions follow the Standard Valuation Law and vary by the contracts’ characteristics and issue year.

Policy reserves on life contracts are based on statutory mortality and valuation interest rates using the Commissioner’s Reserve Valuation Method without consideration of withdrawals. The valuation interest and mortality assumptions follow the Standard Valuation Law and vary by the contracts’ characteristics and issue year.

Valuation methods provide, in the aggregate, reserves that are greater than or equal to the minimum of guaranteed policy cash values or the amount required by law.

Accident and health benefit reserves are developed by actuarial methods and are determined based on published tables using specified statutory interest rates and mortality. Morbidity and lapse assumptions are based on Company experience.

Liability for deposit-type contracts represents contracts without significant mortality or morbidity risk. Payments received from sales of deposit-type contracts are recognized by providing a liability equal to the current value of the policyholders’ contracts. Interest rates credited to these contracts are based on the applicable terms of the respective contract.

LIABILITY FOR POLICY AND CONTRACT CLAIMS

Liabilities for unpaid claims consist of the estimated amount payable for claims reported but not yet settled and an estimate of claims incurred but not reported. The amounts reported are based upon actual pending claim amounts and historical experience, adjusted for trends and current circumstances. Revisions of these estimates are included in the Company’s Statutory Statements of Operations in the year such adjustments are determined to be required.

INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for current and deferred income taxes and recognizes reserves for income tax contingencies in accordance with SSAP No. 101. Under the applicable asset and liability method for recording deferred income taxes, deferred taxes are recognized when assets and liabilities have different values for financial statement and tax reporting purposes, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in

32

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on DTAs and DTLs is recognized in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances on DTAs are estimated based on the Company’s assessment of the realizability of such amounts. Refer to Note 13 of the Company’s financial statements for further discussion of the Company’s income taxes.

REINSURANCE

Policy and contract liabilities ceded have been reported as reductions of the related reserves. Premiums, commissions, expense reimbursement, claims, and claim adjustment expenses related to reinsured business are accounted for on a basis consistent with that used in accounting for the original policies issued and with the terms of the reinsurance contracts and are reported net of amounts ceded to other companies.

A liability has been provided for unsecured policy reserves on reinsurance ceded to companies not authorized to assume business in the state of domicile and is included in funds held under reinsurance treaties with unauthorized companies. Changes in this liability are reported directly in unassigned surplus.

EXPERIENCE REFUNDS

Experience refunds are calculated in accordance with the applicable reinsurance agreements. Experience refunds are primarily determined by claims experience on the ceded blocks, in addition to numerous factors that include profitability of the Company during the period covered by the refund and capitalization levels of the Company. Experience refunds are recorded directly in the Company’s Statutory Statements of Operations.

GUARANTY ASSOCIATION ASSESSMENTS

The Company is required by law to participate in the guaranty associations of the various states in which it is licensed to do business. The state guaranty associations ensure payment of guaranteed benefits, with certain restrictions, to policyholders of impaired or insolvent insurance companies by assessing all other companies involved in similar lines of business. Certain guaranty fund assessments paid by the Company are recoverable through premium tax credits over time.

RECOGNITION OF REVENUE AND RELATED EXPENSES

Scheduled life, accident and health insurance premiums and annuity considerations are recognized as revenue when due. Premiums for universal life and single premium contracts are recognized as revenue when collected. Benefits, surrenders and withdrawals are expensed as incurred. All acquisition costs and maintenance expenses are charged to the Company’s Statutory Statements of Operations as incurred.

OTHER INCOME

Other income primarily consists of various insurance policy charges. In 2020 and 2019, other income also includes IMR ceded as part of the Company’s reinsurance program described in Note 8.

SEPARATE ACCOUNTS

The Company has established unitized Separate Accounts applicable to various classes of contracts providing for variable benefits. Contracts for which funds are invested in the variable Separate Accounts include individual and group life and annuity contracts.

33

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

Net investment income, capital gains and losses, and changes in mutual fund asset values on the variable Separate Accounts are allocated to policyholders and therefore do not affect the operating results of the Company. Assets held in the variable Separate Accounts are carried at fair value. The investment risk of such securities is retained by the contractholder. The Company earns separate account fees for providing administrative services and bearing the mortality risks related to contracts for which funds are invested in variable Separate Accounts.

The activity of the variable Separate Accounts is not reflected in the Company’s financial statements except for the following:

The results of variable annuity contracts and certain variable life policies are reinsured to ALIC pursuant to a modified coinsurance agreement.

NONADMITTED ASSETS

Certain assets are designated as “nonadmitted” under NAIC SAP. Such assets, principally related to amounts advanced to or due from financial representatives, prepaid expenses, aged reinsurance recoverables, deferred tax assets in excess of statutory limits and the Company’s investment in Lancaster Re are excluded from assets and surplus in the Statutory Statements of Admitted Assets, Liabilities and Capital and Surplus as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.

ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Effective January 2020 with early adoption permitted, the NAIC revised SSAP No. 22, “Leases” to SSAP No. 22R, “Leases - Revised” in order to update guidance on leases, including leveraged leases and sale-leaseback transactions. The substantive revisions to SSAP No. 22 were the result of U. S. GAAP based changes by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) through issuance of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. The adoption of these revisions is not expected to have an impact on the financial statements of the Company as the “operating lease” approach without recognition of a right-to-use asset or lease liability is still used under NAIC SAP for lessees.

Effective January 2020 with early adoption permitted, the NAIC revised SSAP No. 100R, “Fair Value”, as a result of the issuance of ASU 2018-13, “Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement”. This ASU was issued in August 2018 as part of a FASB project to improve the effectiveness of U.S. GAAP disclosures. The adoption of these revisions is not expected to have a significant impact on the financial statements of the Company and disclosures will be updated in Note 12.

34

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

Effective April 2019, the NAIC revised SSAP No. 100R, “Fair Value” as a result of the issuance of ASU 2018-36, “Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement”. This ASU was issued to update the timing for the application of ASU 2018-13 for certain of the disclosures, i.e., deletion of the disclosures detailing transfers between Levels 1 and 2, policy for timing of transfers and valuation process for Level 3. The adoption of these revisions did not have a significant impact on the financial statements of the Company and disclosures were updated in Note 12.

Effective December 2019, the NAIC revised SSAP No. 43R “Loan-Backed and Structured Securities” to incorporate guidance for certain government sponsored enterprises credit risk transfer instruments known as mortgage-referenced securities (“MRS”) that meet the statutory classification of a structured note as the holder could lose principal with the performance of the referenced security, however, also encompass both the credit risk of the issuer (e.g., Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac), as well as the credit risk of mortgage loan borrowers. The adoption of these revisions did not have an impact on the financial statements of the Company as they continue to be admitted assets whereas the guidance for other types of structured notes was moved effective December 2019 to SSAP No. 86, “Derivatives” and the assets were nonadmitted.

Effective December 2019 with early adoption permitted, the NAIC revised SSAP No. 69, “Cash Flows”, as a result of the issuance of ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash”. This ASU required restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and ending balances shown on the Statutory Statements of Cash Flows. This revision is to be shown retrospectively, allowing for comparative cash flow statements. The adoption of this revision is included as a reclass between line items of the Statutory Statements of Admitted Assets, Liabilities and Capital and Surplus and related adjustments to the Statutory Statements of Cash Flows with immaterial overall impact to the financial statements.

Effective March 2019 with early adoption permitted, the NAIC amended SSAP No. 43R, “Loan-backed and Structured Securities” to delete the modified filing exempt (“MFE”) guidance. Under the MFE process, the amortized cost basis is used in conjunction with the credit rating provider (“CRP”) rating to determine the final NAIC designation. When eliminated, securities that have a CRP rating that are not captured as financially modeled securities will use the equivalent NAIC designation without adjustment. The adoption of these revisions did not have an impact on the financial statements of the Company as no numeric ratings were changed as a result of early adoption.

The Company has significant transactions with affiliates. Intercompany revenues and expenses recognized under these agreements may not necessarily be indicative of costs that would be incurred if the Company operated on a stand-alone basis and if these transactions were with unrelated parties. Below is a summary of significant transactions with affiliates.

Capital Contributions and Dividends

During 2020, the Company received capital contributions in the amount of $55 million from GILICO. On December 31, 2019, the Company received a capital contribution from GILICO for $20 million.

After receiving prior approval from the NE DOI, the Company paid extraordinary dividends of $40 million and $15 million in 2019, 2018, respectively. The Company did not pay any extraordinary dividends in 2020.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company contributed $82 million to Lancaster Re. For the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company contributed $50 million to Lancaster Re, respectively.

35

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

Reinsurance Related Agreements

As more fully described in Note 8, the Company is party to various reinsurance transactions with affiliates.

Effective April 1, 2020, the Company entered into a stop loss agreement with Kuvare Life Re Ltd., a Bermuda affiliate, to cover excess losses associated with life policies reinsured with Lancaster Re. The Company had a net payable of $0.3 million at December 31, 2020.

Effective October 1, 2020, the Company entered into a coinsurance agreement with Kuvare Bermuda Re Ltd., resulting in the transfer of certain fixed annuity contracts. The Company ceded assets of $1.2 billion and statutory reserves of $1.2 billion for which amounts are collateralized with a funds withheld account and IMR. The Company had a receivable of $1.3 million at December 31, 2020.

On December 31, 2019, the Company entered into a coinsurance agreement with GILICO, resulting in the transfer of certain life and annuity contracts. The Company ceded statutory reserves of $1.3 billion in return for a ceding commission of $27.0 million, which was recorded in the Statutory Statements of Operations. The Company had a net receivable of $11.0 million from GILICO and a net payable of $35.0 million due to GILICO under terms of the coinsurance agreement at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

Effective April 1, 2014, amended and restated on April 1, 2020, the Company entered into an indemnity reinsurance agreement on a combination coinsurance and coinsurance funds withheld basis with Lancaster Re, resulting in the transfer of XXX and AXXX reserves associated with certain term and universal life policies. In April 2014, the Company ceded statutory reserves of $2.7 billion in return for a ceding commission, which was deferred net of tax into unassigned surplus in accordance with NAIC SAP. Amortization of $16.3 million, $16.1 million and $16.0 million was recorded during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, resulting in an unamortized balance in surplus at December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 of $214.2 million, $230.5 million and $246.6 million, respectively. The deferred ceding commission is amortized into income over the period under which earnings emerge from the business reinsured. The Company had a net reinsurance receivable from Lancaster Re of $22.0 million and $35.6 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

There is no reported risk-based capital or Primary Security shortfall associated with these agreements.

Administrative Service Agreements and Other

The Company and HoldCo have entered into a Services Agreement to provide certain administrative and other services to each other. Total expenses incurred under this agreement to HoldCo were $8.7 million and $13.5 million and $22.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The Company and Lancaster Re have entered into a Services Agreement to provide certain administrative and other services to Lancaster Re. The Company and Lancaster Re also entered into an Investment Services Agreement pursuant to which the Company will provide investment management services with respect to assets of Lancaster Re. The Investment Services Agreement does not apply to the Funds Withheld Account held at Lincoln Benefit. Assets may be added to or withdrawn from the accounts at any time by Lancaster Re. Management and administrative fees are payable quarterly and totaled approximately $1.3 million and $(8.7) million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Effective December 31, 2019, the Company entered into a Cost Sharing and Services Agreement with Kuvare US Holdings, Inc. (“Kuvare”) and Kuvare Insurance Services LP (“KIS”) whereby Kuvare and KIS have agreed to provide certain management and administrative services to Lincoln Benefit, including management, reinsurance, legal, audit, administration, financial planning and other services. Lincoln Benefit

36

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

reimburses Kuvare and KIS at cost for services provided by Kuvare and KIS pursuant to this agreement. Total expenses incurred under this agreement to HoldCo were $5.1 million and $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

On December 31, 2019, Lincoln Benefit entered into an Investment Management Agreement with KIS, whereby KIS has agreed to provide certain investment advisory and management services to Lincoln Benefit. No expenses were incurred under this agreement during the year ended December 31, 2019 while expenses of $23.7 million were incurred during the year ended December 31, 2020.

The Company and Lancaster Re have entered into a Tax Allocation Agreement. Refer to Note 13 for more information related to this agreement.

Effective April 1, 2014, the Company entered into a Fee Letter (the “Fee Letter”) with Lanis LLC (“Lanis”) pursuant to which the Company will pay Lanis the risk spread due on the Credit-Linked Note issued by Lanis to Lancaster Re. A reserve had been established on the balance sheet for these payments through April 1, 2019. The reserve was based on a former letter agreement between the Company and Holdco which was terminated effective April 1, 2020. The fee letter also provided reimbursement in cash for any risk spread fees paid by the Company. During 2020, Holdco contributed capital of $2.0 million to the Company in line with the Fee Letter.

Effective November 4, 2016, the Company entered into an intercompany note receivable and note payable agreement with Lancaster Re in equal amounts (initially $100 million, and up to $500 million). The consideration for each note is offset, and interest is paid quarterly based on rates defined in the agreement. The gross amounts as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 were $463.7 million and $211.0 million, respectively.

The maturities of the outstanding intercompany note receivable and payable as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 were as follows:

Interest expense incurred on the note payable and interest income earned on the note receivable for the year ended December 31, 2020 were $5.9 million and $3.9 million, respectively. Interest expense incurred on the note payable and interest income earned on the note receivable for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $10.6 million and $4.7 million, respectively. Interest expense incurred on the note payable and interest income earned on the note receivable for the year ended December 31, 2018 were $13.7 million and $5.6 million, respectively.

37

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

Amounts Due To or From Affiliates

The Company reported the following receivables/(payables) to affiliates as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 excluding amounts related to taxes (see Note 13) and reinsurance agreements:

Intercompany receivable and payable balances are evaluated on an individual company basis. Intercompany balances are generally settled quarterly.

The statement value and fair value of the Company’s debt securities as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 were as follows:

December 31, 2020

December 31, 2019

38

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

The statement value and estimated fair value as of December 31, 2020 by maturity periods for debt securities, other than ABS and MBS were as shown below:

December 31, 2020

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities on ABS and MBS because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties; accordingly, the contractual maturities for those securities are not shown.

Proceeds from sales of investments in debt securities for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were $2.9 billion, $0.9 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively; gross gains for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were $232.0 million, $47.4 million and $4.8 million, respectively, and gross losses for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were $16.1 million, $19.3 million and $47.0 million, respectively. Investment grade debt securities were 97.4% and 98.7% of the Company’s total debt securities as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

For securities sold, redeemed or otherwise disposed as a result of a callable feature (including make whole call provisions), the number of CUSIPs and amount of investment income for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:

Pricing

Non-U.S. government fixed income holdings are valued on the basis of the quotes provided by pricing services, which are subject to pricing validation reviews and a pricing vendor challenge process. Valuations provided by vendors are generally based on the actual trade information as substantially all of the Company’s non-U.S. government holdings are traded in a transparent and liquid market.

Corporate debt securities mainly include investment grade positions, which are priced on the basis of quotes provided by third-party pricing vendors and first utilize valuation inputs from actively traded securities, such as bid prices, bid spreads to Treasury securities, Treasury curves, and same or comparable issuer curves and spreads. Issuer spreads are determined from actual quotes and traded prices and incorporate considerations of credit/default, sector composition, liquidity and call features. Where market data is not available valuations are developed based on the modeling techniques that utilize observable inputs and option adjusted spreads; and incorporate considerations of the security’s seniority, maturity and the issuer’s corporate structure.

39

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

Values of RMBS, CMBS and ABS are obtained from third-party pricing vendors and through quoted prices, some of which may be based on the prices of comparable securities with similar structural and collateral features. Pricing inputs for ABS which are primarily comprised of debt securitized by credit card; student loan and auto receivables; focus on capturing collateral quality and performance, payment patterns, and delinquencies. Values of certain ABS for which there are no significant observable inputs are developed using benchmarks to similar transactions or indices.

For both CMBS and RMBS, cash flows are derived based on the transaction-specific information which incorporates priority in the capital structure and are generally adjusted to reflect benchmark yields, market prepayment data, collateral performance (default rates and loss severity) for specific vintage and geography, credit enhancements, and ratings. For certain RMBS and CMBS with low levels of market liquidity, judgments may be required to determine comparable securities based on the loan type and deal-specific performance. CMBS terms may also incorporate lock-out periods that restrict borrowers from prepaying the loans or provide disincentives to prepay and therefore reduce prepayment risk of these securities, as compared to RMBS. The factors specifically considered in valuation of CMBS include borrower-specific statistics in a specific region, such as debt service coverage and loan-to-value ratios, as well as the type of commercial property.

Other-than-temporary impairments

The Company recognizes and measures OTTI for ABS and MBS in accordance with SSAP No. 43R, “Loan-Backed and Structured Securities”. In accordance with SSAP No. 43R, if the fair value of a structured security is less than its amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date, the Company assesses whether the impairment is an OTTI. When an OTTI has occurred, the amount of OTTI recognized in earnings is the difference between the amortized cost basis of the security and the present value of its expected future cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate implicit in the security.

If the Company intends to sell the structured security, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, an OTTI is considered to have occurred. The amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings is the difference between the amortized cost basis and the fair value of the security.

If the Company does not intend to sell the structured security, or it is not likely that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, the Company performs cash flow testing to determine if the present value of its expected future cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate implicit in the security is less than its amortized cost basis.

Estimating future cash flows is a quantitative and qualitative process that incorporates information received from third parties, along with assumptions and judgments about the future performance of the underlying collateral. Losses incurred on the respective portfolios are based on loss models using assumptions about key systemic risks such as unemployment rates and housing prices and loan specific information such as delinquency rates and loan-to-value ratios.

If the fair value of a debt security, other than those subject to SSAP No. 43R, is less than its amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date, the Company assesses whether the impairment is an OTTI. When an OTTI has occurred, the amount of OTTI recognized in earnings is the difference between the amortized cost basis of the security and its fair value.

If the Company intends to sell the debt security, or it is more likely that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, an OTTI is considered to have occurred. If the Company

40

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

does not intend to sell the debt security, or it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, the Company employs a portfolio monitoring process to identify securities that are OTTI.

The Company has an Investment Committee comprised of investment and finance professionals which meets at least quarterly to review individual issues or issuers that may be of concern. In determining whether a security is OTTI, the Investment Committee considers the factors described below. The process involves a quarterly screening of all securities where fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Discrete credit events, such as a ratings downgrade, are also used to identify securities that may be OTTI. The securities identified are then evaluated based on issuer-specific facts and circumstances, such as the issuer’s ability to meet current and future interest and principal payments, an evaluation of the issuer’s financial position and its near-term recovery prospects, difficulties being experienced by an issuer’s parent or affiliate, and management’s assessment of the outlook for the issuer’s sector.

As a supplement to the qualitative assessment, independent screenings are performed to help identify securities that should be carefully scrutinized for inclusion on the watchlist and in the proper category. These include things like market value to book value ratio, highest unrealized losses, length of time at an unrealized loss and stress test results for structured securities. In making these evaluations, the Credit Committee exercises considerable judgment. Based on this evaluation, issues or issuers are considered for inclusion on one of the Company’s following watchlists: Monitor, Concern, High Concern, or Default.

“Monitor List”- Management has concluded that the Company’s amortized cost will be recovered through timely collection of all contractually specified cash flows, but that changes in issuer-specific facts and circumstances require monitoring on a quarterly basis. The likelihood of future non-repayment is considered not probable. For loan-backed and structured securities, a principal loss would be projected under a significant stress model scenario. No OTTI charge is recorded in the Statutory Company’s Statements of Operations for unrealized loss on securities related to these issuers.

“Concern List”- Management has concluded that the Company’s amortized cost will be recovered through timely collection of all contractually specified cash flows, but that changes in issuer-specific facts and circumstances require monitoring on a quarterly basis. The likelihood of future non-repayment is considered above average but not probable. For loan-backed and structured securities, a principal loss would be projected under a stress model scenario. No OTTI charge is recorded in the Statutory Company’s Statements of Operations for unrealized loss on securities related to these issuers.

“High Concern”- Management has concluded that the Company’s amortized cost will be recovered through timely collection of all contractually specified cash flows, but that changes in issuer-specific facts and circumstances require continued monitoring. A security is moved from the Concern List to the High Concern List when changes in issuer-specific facts and circumstances increase the possibility that a security may become impaired. The likelihood of future non-repayment is considered probable. For loan-backed and structured securities, a principal loss would be projected under a base case model scenario. No OTTI charge is recorded in the Company’s Statutory Statements of Operations for unrealized loss on securities related to these issuers.

“Default List”- A security that is not current with respect to principal and interest or was issued by a company that has entered bankruptcy subsequent to acquisition or experienced a significant credit downgrade. Management has concluded the amortized cost basis of the security may not be recovered due to expected delays or shortfalls in the contractually specified cash flows. For these investments, the amount of OTTI recognized in the Company’s Statutory Statements of Operations is the difference between the amortized cost basis of the security and its fair value or present value of discounted cash flows dependent on the degree of impairment.

41

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

Should it be determined that a security is other than temporarily impaired, the Company records a loss through an appropriate adjustment in carrying value. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company did not incur any OTTI. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company incurred the following write-downs of debt securities, which were subject to SSAP No. 43R:

There are inherent risks and uncertainties in management’s evaluation of securities for OTTI. These risks and uncertainties include factors both external and internal to the Company, such as general economic conditions, an issuer’s financial condition or near-term recovery prospects, market interest rates, unforeseen events which affect one or more issuers or industry sectors, and portfolio management parameters, including asset mix, interest rate risk, portfolio diversification, duration matching, and greater than expected liquidity needs. All of these factors could impact management’s evaluation of securities for OTTI.

Temporary impairments

The gross unrealized losses and fair value of investments, which have been deemed temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment category, number of securities and length of time that securities have been in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2020 and 2019 were as follows:

42

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

Exposure to Subprime and Alt-A mortgages

Subprime mortgages are residential loans to borrowers with weak credit profiles. Alt-A mortgages are residential loans to borrowers who generally have credit profiles above subprime but do not conform to traditional (“prime”) mortgage underwriting guidelines. The Company has invested in certain mortgage-backed and structured securities that include exposure to subprime and other below-prime mortgage loans. These investments are included in bonds in the Statutory Statements of Admitted Assets and are generally reported at amortized cost.

The Company has a comprehensive portfolio monitoring process. No impairments were recorded in the subprime or Alt-A portfolio in 2020, 2019 or 2018. The Company’s practice for acquiring and monitoring subprime and Alt-A securities takes into consideration the quality of the originator, quality of the servicer, security credit rating, underlying characteristics of the mortgages, borrower characteristics, level of credit enhancement in the transaction, and bond insurer strength, where applicable. The originators and servicers of the underlying mortgage loans are primarily subsidiaries of large banks and brokers.

The Company had no indirect exposure to subprime and Alt-A loans as of December 31, 2020 or December 31, 2019.

The Company invests in commercial first lien mortgage loans throughout the United States. Investments are diversified by property type and geographic area. The Company monitors the condition of the mortgage loans in its portfolio. In those cases where mortgages have been restructured, appropriate allowances for losses have been made. In those cases where, in management’s judgment, the mortgage loans’ values are impaired, appropriate losses are recorded.

The geographical distribution of the statement value of the mortgage loans portfolio as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 was as follows:

43

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

Outstanding commitments on certain mortgage loans held in the investment portfolio to finance property improvements on underlying real estate totaled $65.9 million and $5.1 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

During 2020, the maximum and minimum lending rates were 4.96 % and 3.01%, respectively. The maximum and minimum lending rates for commercial mortgage loans during 2019 were 5.17% and 3.57%, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company did not reduce interest rates on any outstanding mortgage loans. Mortgage loans are collateralized by the related properties and did not exceed 74% of the properties’ value at the time the original loan was made in 2020 and 2019, respectively.

A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the principal or interest is not collectible in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. The allowance for credit losses is estimated using the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral of the loan is collateral dependent. A specific allowance for loan loss is established for an impaired loan if the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or the fair value of the loan collateral, less cost to sell, is less than the recorded amount of the loan. During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, no loans were impaired or past due.

A general allowance for loan loss is established based on an assessment of past loss experience on groups of loans with similar characteristics and current economic conditions. While management believes that it uses the best information available to establish the allowances, future adjustments may become necessary if economic conditions differ from the assumptions used in calculating them. There was no general allowance for loan loss at December 31, 2020 or 2019.

As of December 31, 2020, and 2019, the Company held no restructured loans. Should the Company hold any troubled debt, the Company may modify the terms of a loan by adjusting the interest rate, extending the maturity date, or both.

The Company accrues interest income on impaired loans to the extent it is deemed collectible, assuming it is delinquent less than 180 days and the loan continues to perform under its original or restructured contractual terms. Interest income is recognized on impaired mortgage loans upon receipt.

The credit quality indicator for the Company’s mortgage loans is a risk-rated measure based on the borrowers’ ability to pay and the value of the underlying collateral. The Commercial Mortgage Loan risk rating is related to an increasing likelihood of loss, with lower quality ratings representing the category in which losses may be expected. It is used in measuring relative risk for the AVR calculation. The statement value of the Company’s mortgage loans, net of allowances for credit losses, by credit quality indicator as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 was as follows:

44

LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY

NOTES TO STATUTORY STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2020

Realized capital gains and losses on debt securities, mortgages and derivatives which relate to changes in levels of interest rates are charged or credited to the IMR, net of tax, and amortized into income over the remaining contractual life of the security sold. Realized gains and losses from the remaining investments are reported, net of tax, on the Statutory Statements of Operations, but are not included in the computation of net gain from operations. Realized capital gains and losses are recognized on a specific identification basis.

Net realized gains and losses recognized through the Statutory Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were comprised of the following:

Realized capital gains and losses did not include any OTTI for 2020. Realized capital gains and losses included $3.1 million of other-than-temporary impairment losses related to debt securities for the year ended December 31, 2019. Realized capital gains and losses included $4.8 million of other-than-temporary impairment losses related to debt securities for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Changes in unrealized gains and losses from investments are reported as a component of Capital and Surplus, net of deferred income taxes, and were as follows for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018: